IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 :miiim iiiiim 
 
 ■; lU |||||2£ 
 ' si 12.0 
 
 1.8 
 
 
 1.25 1.4 
 
 1.6 
 
 
 -* 6" — 
 
 
 ► 
 
 V} 
 
 J>w 
 
 m 
 
 e: 
 
 
 
 ^/, 
 
 or 
 
 /A 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY 14S80 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 

 &?/ 
 
 t/j 
 
 
 <v' 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions 
 
 Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 1980 
 
 A 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographicaily unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 n 
 □ 
 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommagee 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur^e et/ou pellicul^e 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 I I Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 □ Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 
 □ Colo 
 Plan 
 
 D 
 
 ches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serree peul causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge int^rieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, those 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches djoutdes 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 film^es. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl^mentaires 
 
 L'institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la m6thode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquds ci-dessous. 
 
 I I Coloured pages/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagies 
 
 Pages restored and/o 
 
 Pages restaurdes et/ou pelliculdes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxei 
 Pages d6color6es, tachet^es ou piqu^es 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d^tach^es 
 
 lA/through/ 
 isparence 
 
 lity of prir 
 Quality in^gale de I'impression 
 
 ides supplementary materic 
 prend du materiel supplementaire 
 
 idition available/ 
 Edition disponible 
 
 I I Pages damaged/ 
 
 I I Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 I I Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 I I Pages detached/ 
 
 □ Showthrough/ 
 Tran 
 
 □ Quality of print varies/ 
 Qua 
 
 □ Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comi 
 
 □ Only edition available/ 
 Seule 6d\t\ 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 film^es i nouveau de facon i 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmd au taux de reduction indiqud ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 30X 
 
 ■■MHIk'M 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 y 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 National Library of Canada 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grdce d la 
 g6n6rosit6 de: 
 
 Bibliothdque nationale du Canada 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettet^ de l'exemplaire filmd, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimde sont filmds en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, seion le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont film^s en commenpant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol — »- (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "I, or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 dernidre image de chaque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbole -^ signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbole V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent &Ue 
 film6s d des taux de reduction diff^rents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre 
 reproduit en un seul cliche, il est film^ d partir 
 de Tangle supdrieur gauche, de gauche k droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la m6thode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
ITHIN 
 
 THE 
 
 MPI RE. 
 
T 
 
^iTHIJsr 
 
 THE 
 
 ^MPlB^ 
 
" We are anxious above all things to conserve, to unify, to strength- 
 " en the Kmpire of the Queen, because it is to the trade that is carried 
 "on WITHIN THE EMPIRE that wc look for the vital force of the Com- 
 " merce of this country. — Lord Salisbury. 
 
/^ V 
 
 WITHIN THE EMPIRE; 
 
 / 
 
 AN ES.SAY ON 
 
 IMPERIAL FEDERATION 
 
 —BY- 
 
 THOMAS MACFARLANE, F.R.S.C. 
 
 ■-♦- — 
 
 OTTAWA : 
 
 James Hope & Co., 
 
 1891. 
 
>^U8 
 
 M. 
 
 \^ 
 
 l7i2dH 
 
TO 
 LIEUT.-COL. ('. K. HOWARD VINCENT, C.B., M.P.. Ktc. 
 
 A MBMBRR OK THK KXKClTTrVR COMMITTKK 
 OK THK 
 
 IMPERIAL FEDERATION LEAGUE 
 
 AND POUNDER OP THE 
 
 UNITED EMPIRE TRADE LEAGUE, 
 
 THIS E88AY IS, BY PERMISSION, 
 
 MOST RE8PECFULLY DEDK^ATED, 
 
 IN THE HOPE THAT ITS (;ONTENT8 MAY ASSIST 
 IN THE ADOPTION, 
 
 BY BOTH LEAGUES, 
 
 OP ONE AND THE SAME PLAN KOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A 
 
 UNITED BRITISH EMPIRE. 
 
aON"TE!ITTS 
 
 Paoe. 
 
 Introduction 
 
 Chapt^T. I. The Ne(t,.s8it.v for Action 
 
 II. NationaliticM and Nations 
 
 n I. A Retrospect and Uh Lesson 
 
 IV. The (Colonial Conference 
 
 V. An Imperial Treasury 
 
 VI. A British (^inimercial Union 
 
 VII. Fair Protection vs. Foul Tratie 
 
 VIII. A Parliament of Parliaments 
 
 IX. A Federal Executive ; Kngland's Hegemony 71 
 
 X. An Anglo-Saxon Connnonwealth ; Conclusion , . . . . m 
 
 o 
 7 
 18 
 10 
 26 
 36 
 45 
 54 
 62 
 
M' 
 
IXTKODUiTlOX, 
 
 Fctlcmtioii oi Scparat ion ? Wliich of long can tlic Unilcil Kingdom hf cx- 
 
 llicse fates is in stoic foi-tliat wonder- p('ct<'<l to pi'oti'ct, at her own expense. 
 
 Fill af^'LCi'e'-C'ite of statesor nations called the sliij>ping and coasts of all the Hi-i- 
 
 Itlif Hrilish Knipiie? This isa (piest ion t ish Colonies and dependencies I-' How 
 
 ^V liich has pi'ohahly pi-escnled its«'lfto long will these Hi-itivli jiossessions he 
 nany minds during the last f(>w years, content t<» hav«» their foi'cign alTairs 
 
 I'egai'ds Separation it is enough to controlled hy a I'arlianient in wliieh 
 
 iiay thai it is opposed to the pat riot ic they havi' no represental ion y The 
 
 ientinieiit of the vast majority of Hii- answer to thes«' (pieries can scarcely he 
 
 Iffish suhjects tln-oughoul tin- Kn\pire. 
 ^Jporeover it is inipossihle of aci'oni- 
 |l;|^lishment, for the consent of all thean- 
 lorities intei-ested is neccssaiy tosuch 
 
 different in suhstanc<' from tlie follow- 
 ing:--()nly until an arrangement can 
 he made nioi'e advantageous for all 
 concerned. This conclusion hi-ings >js 
 
 iiange. On the other hand many | to face fh<' eiupiii-y as to whetlier such 
 ybelicve that the (juestion of Imperial an advantageous re-ai-rangement can Ix; 
 
 'edei'jition will fttrce itself npim us for 
 pic'ttlement at no very distant date. 
 MBut hefore an ordinary citizen of (Ji-eat 
 
 found in Imperial Fetleiat ion. 
 
 Five years have e!ap.M>d since I lead 
 a ])aper hefore th<' .Montreal Mianch of 
 
 |i' (Jreater Hritain will i)estir himself to I the Imperial Federation League in 
 kco this prohlem he will naturally ask: Canad.i tMititled, " .V I'nited Kmpii-e." 
 P^annot we i-emain as we .ire? Is not In writing this and a good many othei- 
 |»e present lorni of Hritain's coiuiec- articles, which have since a|)pfared in 
 P|on with hi'r various possessions satis- the colunms of Inijurinl /■'>■(/< r<i/ Ion, 
 rfactory, and itdieiently permanent y | and other jo)u-nals, it seeme<l to me as 
 |;:«rsot a few of the people interested if the advantages to he dei-ived fTdin a 
 pl&id >:'..me individuals in high posit ion, consoHdat ion of the Fmi»ii'e incii.isi'd, 
 l^ilil'e iiicliived to answei- these (pie>t ions and the diftlcult i«'s in the way of such 
 ■ ♦t'firmatively. \'oic('s to this effect a consununation decrejised with I'very 
 
 ■Wi'ie iieard not long ago in the Domin- renewed consideiation of the subject. 
 
 fen House of Conuuons, and ev<>n at I ha ve since h'-come a lirm helicver in 
 
 iie of (he ni'M'tings called toorg;ini/,e tfie i)ract icahilit y of .i closer Hritish 
 <■ lm|»ei'inl Fedeiation League somi' I'nion, and have endcMN tmrrd in this 
 i're present who objected to decl.iiing essay to I'ei-ast t he aii iil s ;iho\e re- 
 tnat "the political i'elati«)ns hciween ferred to, in( orpor.ite tlr-m with new 
 (ireat Ih'itain and her c<)lonies must ni.ilter and place t hem before my fel- 
 nie\ilaf»ly le.id to federation or disin- low count rynien in the hope of induc- 
 
 
 tegration." 
 
 ing in them a like failii. It is not my 
 
 ;, Nevertheless, it i.s possiltle to main- , object to |»rovid<'an oi-iginal scheme for 
 t*it> that the i-elations in ([uest ion aic the reeonst ruction of Ib.e Hritish Fm- 
 ^>t satisfactory. This will become pire, for many of the suggest ions here 
 
 I'ident to any one who seriously asks 
 ■mself the following (piestions :- -How 
 
 end)odied ha\e long been before the 
 public. Hut I have tried to imitate th<' 
 
6 
 
 example of Watt with the steam 
 engine, and to so combine these jis tci 
 proihiee n plan whieh nwiy ultimately 
 result in the ronstruetion of a political 
 machine, capable of working well and 
 harmoniously for the common weal. 
 
 It is not, however, tobeaasumed that 
 the "conunon weal" of all British sub- 
 jects is to be found in unlimited exten- 
 sion of the .siilTrnge, in placing our 
 trade interest^s at the mercy of for- 
 eigners, or in completely abolishing the 
 House of Lords ; neither can it consist 
 in a levelling up of all orders, chisses 
 and raees in the Empire to one com- 
 UKm standing. Efforts of this sort 
 have ended in faihu-e before now. 
 About two hundred and fifty years ago 
 the Connnons of England passed an 
 Act declaring that the t-ountry and its 
 dominions and territori«'s should here- 
 after be governed as a ('onunonwealth 
 and Free State "for the good of the 
 people, and that without any King or 
 H«mse of Lords." It was the fashion 
 of that time to make short work with 
 
 ! machinery of Government. The Lonj; 
 
 j Parliament had shortened th<' King by 
 
 I a head; Cromwell h.ad shortened thi 
 Ijong Parliament to a rump, and finally 
 the Rum)> materially shortened thf 
 
 ! con.stitution and essayed to govern 
 England " without any King or Ilousf 
 
 ! of Loi-ds." It may at once be stated 
 
 ! that this (piotation does not furnish. 
 
 ' even in a distant degree, a text for the 
 j>resent essay. On the contrai-y, it is 
 my convicti<»n that by conserving tlit 
 rights of the Crown, and properly ex- 
 ercising thi'in, by making use of tlu' 
 
 ■ stability and statesmanship tobefouinl 
 in an upper House, and by defendiiiK 
 the commercial interests as well as the 
 
 I territorial integrity of the Empire, <-i 
 compact aggregate of British Nations 
 would r«'sult, well entitled to be (•■•illed 
 an Imperial Commonwealth, and fully 
 able to promote the material prosperity 
 
 ; and highest welfare, in short, thf 
 "Conunonweal" of all British subjects 
 
 : and all the varied races now liviti;.' 
 " within the Empire." 
 
 i 
 
int. Tlu' Long 
 od the KinK l>y 
 shorteiu'il tht 
 imp, and finally 
 shortt'iu'd tlif 
 yed to govt'in 
 King or Hou^'' 
 once be st«tt'<l 
 i\s n<»t furnish, 
 c, a t«'xt for tlif 
 contrary, it is 
 conserving tlit 
 id properly ex- 
 king tise of tln' 
 ship tohefouml 
 d by defending 
 :» as well as tlu' 
 the Empire, ji 
 British Nations 
 tied to be calU'd 
 calth, and fully 
 terial prosperity 
 in short, the 
 British subjects 
 Ices now livinj: 
 
 CHArXER I. 
 
 The Necessity for Action. 
 
 When the news arrived frcmi England 
 six yeai-s.-tgo, «)f th«' formation of the 
 Imperial Fe<leration League by some 
 of the foremost statesmen and admin- 
 istrators in the Fhnpire, it was received 
 as glad tidings by many loyal hearts. 
 In these, the hope of a I'nited Emjjire 
 had been hidden away for years with- 
 'out a chance of germinating. In 1885 
 the favourable time s<'emed to have ar- 
 rived to agitate for the Unity of the 
 Empire, and "The imperial Federatior 
 League in Canada" was formed. The 
 foimders of the I^eague at honu' gave 
 no uncertain soinul with regard to their 
 '. objects, and while acknowledging that 
 ■ their path was beset with ditticulties, 
 tlu^y were ready, whenever opportunity 
 offered, to point these out, and discuss 
 the best means of overcoming them. 
 It is true that the resolutions adoi)ted 
 were general and elastic, but several of 
 the leaders grve their views quite free- 
 ly regarding the political aspect of Fed- 
 eration, and even discuss«>d the besc 
 plan of est4iblishing a Parliament for 
 , the Empire. It was lu)ped and expected 
 ■I that, by such discussions and candid in- 
 terchanges of opinion, a plan for the 
 proposed Federation would gradually 
 l)e developed, satisfactory to the gi-eat 
 majority of the nuMnbei-s of the League, 
 capable of being placed before the Eng- 
 lish and Colonial public as its platform 
 and of being pressed upon the states- 
 ^ men of the Empire for consideration 
 '^~ and action. 
 
 It has to be admitted, unfortunately, 
 
 ' that tliese expectations have not been 
 realised, and that many loyalists in 
 i Canada are again beginning to experi- 
 ence a little of the hojie deferred which 
 " maketh the heart sick." Not only 
 have tlu' utterances of om* leaders he- 
 conu' more and nu»r»' indi^:tinct, but tln^ 
 efforts of memlMMN to get the poli<-y of 
 the licagiu" defined have been iliscour- 
 aged, and it has become the fashion to 
 sneer at such tn)id)lesom«' individuals 
 a.s "constituti«)n-mongers." Speaking 
 generally, it may be said that Lord 
 Salisbury's remark about the FairTrad- 
 ei-s applies with etpial force t«) Imperial 
 Federal ionists : "VVIn're they are pre- 
 '* else Ihey ai'e not agreed and where 
 I " they are agreed they are not precise." 
 I When \v(- reflect that the Anti-Corn 
 I Law League accomplished its «>bject in 
 ! seven years, that frtnn the start that 
 I object was well defined and that five 
 'years have elapsed since our move- 
 ment was inaugurated, we caiuiot but 
 j be convinced thatan accelerated rate of 
 pr«>gress would result if the Federaticm 
 faith were properly fornudated, and a 
 stan(hird raised round which true Ih'it- 
 ish men might rally and fight, and 
 which they might ultimately carry for- 
 ward to victoi y. From the following 
 facts it will, however, be seen that 
 there is no hop*' of this at present, and 
 that therefore individual Federat ionists 
 nve justified in speaking out and insist- 
 ing that tlu' time ha.s arrive<l for action 
 on the part of the League a« a whoU'. 
 
 On the 23i-d of Jidy, 18«), Lord Salis- 
 
8 
 
 bui-y wr()t<' to the Prcsidi'nt of the 
 liiip(>i-ial F('(l»'riitiou licaf^uc, on hcluilf 
 of iiiiiisclf and coIltNi^iU's in the lni])«>- 
 riiil (fovennncnt, that tlicy would •' Iw 
 " happy to rct'civo and to coiisich-i", 
 " with all the resju'ct due toaconiniiui- 
 " ication from so inHuential a body, 
 "any suj^^estions which th«> Lcajfuc 
 '* «l('sir»'s to make for the purpose of 
 ** niodifyiug tlie relations between this 
 *' coinitry and its eolonies." No such 
 suKf^esticm has since been made by 
 the Council of tlie I^eague, nnii-h to 
 t be rejifret of many who are anxious for 
 the progress of the movement. 
 
 For a lonj; time the Imperial Feder- 
 ation League avoided the adopti(m of 
 any ]>articular ])lan for closer union. 
 At last, it ventui'ed a st<»p forward and 
 applied to Her Majesty's (Jovennnent 
 to summon a second ('(donial Confer- 
 ence. Every federationist woidd, with- 
 out d(ad)t, have hailed with joy the as- 
 seiid)ling of another Council t)f the 
 fOnii)ire, but Loi'd Salisbury was averse 
 to the proposal, and expressed the 
 opinion that "it would be an unusual 
 " and in«'xpedient course for the gov- 
 " enuuent to summon a meeting to 
 " consider the ipiestion of ^^(h'l'ation 
 " unless they were themselves jn-epared 
 " to make a rectunmendation on the 
 " subject." Under these circmnstaiu-es 
 the wisdom of i»ersisting in the api)li- 
 cation for sununoning a conference at 
 «»nc(^ may well be questioned. 
 
 Here in Canada when the Govern- 
 ment is approached by the rei)resenta- 
 tives of any body <if citizens, the latter 
 would consider itself as very fairly and 
 favourably treated, if recpiested to 
 formulate its views for the considera- 
 tion of Ministei-s. They would oidy be 
 too glad to do so, especially if the Pre- 
 nuer j)roniised to treat them "with all 
 the respect due to so influential a body." 
 There does not seem to be any reason 
 
 wliy, in Fngland, such a course woidd 
 not be fitting, and tlu-re is too nuuh 
 reason to fear that the Council of the 
 Ijeague "missed the occasion" uhen 
 they neglected to take advantage of 
 Lord Salisbury's offer to receive and 
 consider their views. 
 
 Li August, IHSS, Sii- Hector Langevin, 
 delivei-ed at .loliette, in the l^rovince 
 of Quebec, a foi-cilde speech on Im- 
 perial Federation, in the presence of 
 liis colleagues in the Canadian (Govern- 
 ment, Sir Adolphe Caron and the Hon. 
 Mr. Chapleau. In this speech Sir 
 Hector threw down the gauntlet to 
 Imperial Federationists, and demanded 
 a declai-ation of their principles. He 
 said : " L -t them shew us in black and 
 "white how this Impei-ial F«'(leration 
 "can take elTect without destroying 
 "our existing libel ti»'s; let them shew 
 "us what voice we shall have in this 
 "grand Imperial Parliament, that is to 
 "decide (pu'stions concerning all (piar- 
 " ters of theKmi)ire : let them shew us 
 "hf)W the L'nited Kingdom will modify 
 "its fiscal policy so as n<}t to force us 
 "to have rec()urse to direct taxation. 
 " Further, let them tell us, will oui" re- 
 "pnvsentation be based on popula- 
 "tion':*" Up to the present moment 
 this appeal remains without oflicial re- 
 joinder from the Imi>erial Federation 
 League, although it is plain that a 
 luiion, such as federationists desire, 
 cannot be brought about without the 
 good will of the French t>anadians and 
 their leaders. Sir Hector's opposition 
 is bred of distrust. Imjierial Federa- 
 tion is to him suspicious from its vague- 
 ness, and it is plain that if the fears of 
 his compatriots are to be removed the 
 authf)rities of the Leagiie must an- 
 nounce a more defiintepijlicy. 
 
 Several efforts have been ma<le since 
 the delivery of Sir Hector's speech to 
 impress upon the officials of the League, 
 
 
9 
 
 Dursf would 
 is t<»«) iiiiu-ii 
 niiu'il of llu' 
 ision" wlu'ii 
 (Ivantn^c of 
 r»'('i'iv(' and 
 
 >r liau^fvin, 
 
 he Proviufc 
 
 cch on Irii- 
 
 |)r«'H('iU"«' of 
 
 lian (lOVi'Vii- 
 
 Liul th«' Hon. 
 
 s))t'»'rli Sir 
 
 Kuuntlt't to 
 
 ul dcuinndfd 
 
 ncijdes. H<' 
 
 in hl.-u-k and 
 
 I F«'(Ierati(fn 
 
 destroying 
 
 t tlicni sIh'W 
 
 iiave in tiiis 
 
 t, that is to 
 
 n(jf all (luar- 
 
 «'in slu'W us 
 
 will modify 
 
 t to forco us 
 
 ct taxation. 
 
 will our rt'- 
 
 on i)f)pula- 
 
 nt nioniiMit 
 
 it official rt'- 
 
 Fi'dcratio'i 
 
 lain that a 
 
 ists di'sirt', 
 
 without the 
 
 ladians and 
 
 ^ ()})position 
 
 ial Fociei-a- 
 
 n its vagiie- 
 
 tlie fears of 
 
 pinovcd the 
 
 nujst an- 
 
 inade since 
 speech to 
 the League, 
 
 Itoth here and in England, tlie necessity 
 of i-eplying authoritatively to such de- 
 mands for more information. Some 
 plain statement of |)olicy is indis])ens- 
 al»le to enal.'le those who believe in Im- 
 perial Kedei-ation to convince others 
 tiiat a closer union of the vai-ious por- 
 tions of the Kmpir*' would he of 
 advantage all round, and that it would 
 not. in any material tlegree, irjterfere 
 with the rights we now enjoy. But up 
 to the pi-esent tinu' the Council of tlu- 
 licague has not thought fit to move in 
 the desired direction, and to-day Sir 
 Hector's remark of two years ago may 
 lie repeated with e(pial emphasis, "the 
 ••fact is that this tpiest ion has not been 
 ■•carefully considered." 
 
 On the J)th May, ISS.'), scait-i-ly six 
 luonths after the inaugural ion of the 
 parent society in England, the In\peri- 
 al Federation League in ('ana<la was 
 tormtHl. On t!.e evening of the same 
 day. in .Montreal, a most successful 
 public meeting was held, the lu'wly 
 elected president, Mr. Dalton McCarthy, 
 presiding and giving utterance to these 
 words: "We are all prepared to 
 "shoulder a musket in defence of the 
 ••mother-land, and she is eipially ready 
 "to «lo the same by u.-. If that senti- 
 "ment fills every hiyal lu^art, there can 
 "be no harm in putting in definite 
 •■ terms the etmditions under which we 
 "can i)e called up<ui to stand shouhh-r 
 •• to shoidder." Many elocpienf words j 
 were sj)(>ken besides those of tlie Ptesi- \ 
 dent, but none awakened sui-h enthusi- 
 asm a.s the speedi of Principal Cirant 
 of Queen's L^niversity. Two years and | 
 a half afterwards tli^' latter distinguisii- j 
 ed orator penn<'d the following sen- i 
 t^'uces in an essay entitled, "Canada 
 First." "The weakness inherent to 
 "political organizations that have no 
 •definite work to do Is see-n in tlu' 
 ••difBcidty that has been found in 
 
 "forming, and maintaining in exist- 
 "euce, branchesof the Im|M'rial Feden;- 
 "tion L 'ague. I an» a meud»er of tliat 
 " league, but it is evident that it will 
 "soon vanish into thin air, unites some 
 "scheme of commercial or politic-al 
 "nation is agreed upon for the carrying 
 "out of which its mend)ers may 
 " work." 
 
 Mr. (i. I)own«'s (^arter. President «)f 
 the League in Victoria, when visiting 
 England, nearly two years ago, ex- 
 pressed himself as follows at a meeting 
 of the League: " In speaking to-day, I 
 "simply put before you that which I 
 "believe to be th«' true position of 
 "affairs, and when you give the woid 
 "that we are to announce a more ac- 
 "tive progranune, you will Hud no 
 "warmer advocate than myself. Until 
 "you give that sanction we shall be 
 "perfectly hiyal to the patent League ; 
 "for tliere nuist not be two voices, one 
 "speaking one way and one another. 
 "But I do put this question before you 
 "for consideration, whether the tinu' 
 "has n»)t now ari-ived when we shoidd 
 "have an active instead of a mere 
 "passive policy— whether you should 
 " not have a positive instea<l of a nega- 
 "tive force, because if you do not, one 
 "does not know wlmt at any monu'nt 
 "may happen." 
 
 In March, 1880, Sir Frederick Young 
 wrote reganling the P<dicy of the 
 League as follows: "The time nuist 
 "undoid)tedly come when thisjudici- 
 "ous reticence will have to be abaiui- 
 "on»'d, and when someil«'finite scheme 
 "nuist be pi t foiward by the League, 
 "as the one for which it claims sup- 
 "port, forgiving practical effect to the 
 "principle it advocates — the Federation 
 "of Great Britain and her Colonies." 
 In the same article, Sir Frederick 
 })laces on recor«l a sunnnary of the 
 various plans which had been proposed 
 
10 
 
 fcir effect in>^ thp ol)j<'ct of the LeaKuc 
 Riiicr tlien we Iiave lind four years of 
 (Useiissioii, and tlie coliiiinis of //»- 
 pet'iiil F«'(fcnifi<m contain Ihe tlioii^litH 
 of niany writers on the inouientous 
 subject, but still tlie time referred to 
 by Sir Frederick Voiini? seems to be as 
 far distant as ever. 
 
 F'l-oin these (|Uotations atid th(^ cir- 
 cumstances above narrated, it will be 
 seen that from all (juartei-s, fi-iendiy 
 and hostile alike, the fjeairur- has b«'en 
 ur^ed to propound a more (h'finite 
 policy. Tbit all that it can be held re- 
 sponsible fr)r ai-e the folIowiiiLf |)rinci- 
 plcs taken fr(tm its publisJied proceed- 
 ings, net^lecliiif? only the resolutions 
 which rr-fer to mattei-s of or>j^ani/.a- 
 tion. 
 
 1. That in ordcM- to secmc the per- 
 manent unity of the Kmpire some form 
 of federation is essential. 
 
 2. That the object of IheLeafijue is to 
 secure by Federation the pei-manent 
 unity of the Fmpii-e, 
 
 ;-{. That no scheme of Fetleration 
 should interfere with theexistiiijU'ri^litH 
 of Local I\irliameiits as r«>f,rards local 
 j'.iTairs. 
 
 -I. That any scluMiie of Imperial 
 Federation shcndd condiine on an 
 equitable basis the resources of the 
 Empire for the maintenance of coni- 
 m(m interests, and adecpiately provide 
 for an organized defence of conunon 
 rights. 
 
 '). That tlie establishment of ))eriodi- 
 cal conferences of i-epnvsentatives of, 
 the self-poverninfj; communities of the 
 Empire should be the first aim of il\e 
 Fmperial Federation T,,eague. ; 
 
 While attempting to critici/.e tlic 
 policy of the Leaj^^ue, we must not 
 neglect to acknowledge the great obli-* 
 gation which that body has conferred 
 ir>on tlie friends of the movement, in 
 providing such a joiuMial as Imperial 
 
 Fn/rrafltni for tho discussion of all 
 phases of the (piestion. It is hard to 
 say wliich is most to be admired ; th • 
 ability with which it has Im-ku conduct- 
 ed or the liberality with which its col- 
 umns have been thrown open t-o the 
 ex|>ression of every shade of o|)iuion 
 among Federat ionists. 
 
 It is also to be gratefully recogni/.eil 
 that the I>eague in raising thv standard 
 of the "permanent unity of the Em- 
 pire" has done. excellent work in Eng- 
 land. Hut it can scarcely be admitted 
 that a new organization, based ui»on 
 this principle alone, was necessary in 
 {'ana<la. because fi<lelity to British 
 connection is one of the essential 
 characteristics of the |jibe»-il-('onserva- 
 tive party. This grand principle the 
 League proposes to secui-e l)y Feilera- 
 tion, that is to say, if .Mr. Freeman's 
 definition is to be accept e<l, by (rausing 
 the vaiious parts of the Em})ir'e t<i foim 
 fme state in its relatixi with othei- 
 Powei's. Can it be said that in its plat- 
 form thei'e is one j)i'actical measure 
 propose(l to cause the Empire to pre- 
 sent a imited front to foreign nations- 
 To take a very simplcunstance, is tlieie 
 in it nny proi)ositi<m so to reorganiz<' 
 tlie IJritish dijiloinatic service as t<i 
 make it a; cai-eful of th«' inteiests of 
 India and New Zealand as of England;-' 
 or does it afford any j)i'ospect of the 
 invention of a coimmm coinage 
 for the Empire ? Thei-e is not a 
 single ])ractical step toward Feciera- 
 tion proposed or even suggested, ami 
 tiie ]irogramnie of the League might 
 fairly be paraphrased by these words. 
 "We want to federate the Empire, but 
 "d(m't know liow, and wish the Im- 
 "perial Government to tnketiie matter 
 "in hand." 
 
 To ask the Government of the day to 
 call togetiier ('olonial Conferences t<i 
 coiisitler "the. possibility of establisji- 
 
 
 ill 
 
 :fle 
 'p( )S 
 bo; 
 frai 
 our 
 
 it i> 
 
 ih!^ 
 
 ihoi 
 
 g'H 
 Us 
 
11 
 
 ly rec()j?ni/.i'"l 
 ; t\v.' slaiular-l 
 y «)f Ihc Kin- 
 work in Kiif^- 
 y hi' luliiiitti'il 
 1, hascd upon 
 s nt'ccssjiry in 
 y to British 
 the essential 
 i.Til-Conscrvii- 
 priiicipl*' thf 
 lU'o by Fcdera- 
 Mr. Fncinairs 
 f(l, by (;ausin^ 
 Jmpii'*' t<i form 
 111 with other 
 hat in its plat - 
 tiral nieasiirt- 
 Empire to pr»'- 
 n'ij^n nations? 
 ■itant-c, is Iht'iv 
 to rcorgani/.f 
 siM'vifo as to 
 h«' int(*i*'sts of 
 ;i.s of England? 
 )rospect of the 
 lion coinage 
 re is not a 
 )ward FtMiera- 
 suggestod, and 
 League might 
 ly these words, 
 lie Empire, Imt 
 I wish the Im- 
 take the matter 
 
 at of the day t<> 
 Conferences to 
 ty of establish- 
 
 ing cloHor an«l more suhstanlial nnion," I But to obtain this by corresponilenee 
 is to ask it to devise a plan and to take ' and without bringing representatives 
 the responsibility of proposing it. If of tlie licague togethei- to exciiang** 
 th«' [mperial Federation lieagneeannot ideas vei'bally woidd be, ol)\ iotisly, a 
 shoulder this responsil)ility. is il reason- very impei-feel eoursi-. It is true that 
 able to ask the IniperiaHiovernment th<> eonstitut ion of the League contains 
 to do so? The League isonly a private no provision for consult ing the Coloidal 
 organi/ation, and even if it were to organisations before t.iking any iin- 
 ^1 make mistakes in its proposals the portnnl action, but it is (piite possible 
 matter would not be so vei-y sei'ious. for the I^'ague in ICngland to invent 
 Bui it is very ditferent with a (lovern- suchnieans. I ndee<l it is very necessary 
 nicMl. wl'.ose mistakes may not only be that it should do so uidess the Colon-, 
 ruinous to itself, but may be also very ; ial Leagues are to become independent 
 disastrous for the c(aintry. Moreover and form their own plans. To prevent 
 it ii< doul)tful whether a government anything of this sort, and to piduiole 
 Can be reasonably called upon t«) act in tlu' unity and progress of the move- 
 a matter which has not been placed be- nu-nt, besides preparing the wa\ for a 
 fore the peopje. and upon whi -h public second Conference, it would seeui inde- 
 (ipinion has not been formed. Even spensible to call together a com cut iou 
 supposing that a second Colonial ('on- I of Imp«'rial Fedei-atioidsts. Indeed, 
 ference were called, what would the when we come to think, it seeiiis won- 
 League Ite pre|)ured to recommend ?> dei-ful that nothing of the sort haN yet 
 To judge fi'om their utterances its lea<l- been held, and that we have made any 
 fvs would be "caught napping." If real pi-ogress without it. 
 'tliey were wise, j>efoi«' urging the gov- The Imperial I'^edera'ion League was 
 t'lniuent to take action they would call , not formed out- moment too soon, for 
 n Congress of Federationists and I inHuences, are at work in several Colon- 
 decide upon the best measures to pro- ies which will make the Consolidation 
 pose. We might tlien be able to cease of the Em|)ire the more difficult of ac- 
 boastingthat we hadnopnigramme.and complisliment the longer it is postpon- 
 frame the best that can be devised with ed. There never was a case in which 
 our jireseiit light, stating plainly that it <'ould be said with greater truth that 
 it issubjec: to revision with the growth delays are dangerous, and never one in 
 pi our knowk'dge and experience. All which the time for positive action was 
 
 l^his is the work of the League and 
 4hould precede any action by Her 
 :yla.jesty's Ciovernnieiit. 
 cl Such a ])rogramme should emanate 
 ik'om the whole Imperial P'edeiat ion 
 
 more o{)|)ortune than at present. In a 
 speech in the House of Lords, not so 
 very long ago, the noble President of 
 the League made use of this very word 
 "opiiortunity," and just as be then 
 
 e.igue throughout the Empire, and ' urged reform on his colleiigues. so may 
 Hot from the Council or Executive Com- «ictiou now be urged upon the Execu- 
 initleeof the parent body alone. Nor, live Committee of the Le;igiie in the 
 Indeed, does I lie latter claim any mono- ! very (piotation Lord K«>.sebeiy made 
 poly in the matter. Lord Uosebery ii«<' of :— 
 
 kimself decl'irpn flint it elwnilil liu " ^Hss not tl\c' occusioii ; b> I ho forclotk t;ik(; 
 gnus, ir (uciaies tnnt it SliouKl lie Tlu.t subtle i)<nv*r of novor halt iuK time. 
 fguided by the opinion t>f the Colon- bost the mere nionienls puttiiiK olf whoulil 
 ?s " with regard toanother Conference. Misehanee alnio-st as grave as crime." 
 
12 
 
 ill: 
 
 Of cdurs*' it is iiuuinlxMit npini Miuse 
 who urK«' action tn iinlicah' tJu' dirrc- 
 tioii it should takt*. This I iiav«> «'ii- 
 dcavoiii-cd to do in th«' present chaptt'r. 
 I recommend a convention of In>periid 
 Federationists to a^ree upon a ])lan to 
 In* sn^^ested to Lord Salisliury for tlie 
 consideration of an Imperial Confer- 
 ence. Fn the following chapters of this 
 essay I shall endeavour to describe 
 what I consider to he the plan of easiest 
 execution. It may \w said briefly to 
 consist of the following stejjs : 
 
 A. Obtain tut IiniH'rUil ItvrcuucU'inn 
 a duty of 5 per cent, ad ra/drnn on all 
 f«»reij?n imports into every part of the 
 Km 'ire over and above all local tnritl's. 
 
 B. Place this revenue in char>?e of 
 an [niiHi-idl Minisfri/, separate; from 
 that of Kn^land, to defray the c<ist of 
 the Iti'itish navy, and to meet other 
 hnp(>rial outlays. 
 
 C. Let this Ministry be responsible 
 tof//j hnpcr'Ktl Semite, f«>rmed by so 
 re-constructing the House of Lords as 
 to giv«' r«'presentation to each division 
 of the Flmpire in proportion to its con- 
 tribution to the revenue. 
 
 There is abundant evidji'nce to show 
 that the commercial phase of FVdei-a- 
 tion is up|)ermost in the('olonial mind. 
 On the other hand, it may be noticed 
 that, in the L^nited Kingdom, the cur- 
 rent of th(»ught among Federationists 
 turns mostly «)n the defence of the ICm- 
 |»ire, the extent to which the Colonies 
 I lUght to contribute to its cost and to the 
 improvement of inter-British telegraph 
 and jiostal affairs. A third view is that 
 of the Fair-traders, who adopt the 
 principle <)f " Free-trade (as far {is pos- 
 "sible) within the Emjjire, and Protec- 
 "tion against the world." Now, if 
 these different ciii'rents of thought re- 
 garding Federation, now flowing 
 separately, although in the same direc- 
 tion, could be guided into t)ne channel 
 
 their power would begreiitly augment- 
 ed, and, in fact, rendered iri-esistible. 
 This union may be accomplished and 
 the triple object of uniting and defend- 
 ing the Kmpire, and enc« uraging its 
 trade attained by the adoption (»f the 
 ab4ive mentioned measures. 
 
 It is sometimes argued that the Col- 
 onial legislatures shouhl be the tii-st to 
 fornudate their wishes for closer union. 
 Meanwhih' the Coloniesare waiting for 
 action by the Mother ('ounti-y. L'nder 
 such circinustances there ean Iw no 
 progress; and how is it to be expected 
 that a legislature can act before public 
 o|)inion has been educated by the opera- 
 tions of the League and its branches? 
 They nnist first propose ju policy. Here 
 again the branches wait on the parent 
 League, and the latter, apparently, on 
 the branches. Well ; the League in 
 Canada has taken action on the (Jom 
 mercial (juestion without provoking 
 action by the League in L«)ndon. How 
 long are we to play at,this shifting and 
 shirking of responsibilities? 
 
 Lessing (;auses the fiery fSaladin to 
 exclahn, "He who considers seeketh 
 reasons for not daring." Schiller 
 makes William Tell say, " He who de- 
 liberates too much will accomplish 
 little." It is a common German saying 
 that, " Boldly ventured is half won." 
 In these days Germany suits its action 
 to its woi'ds. Is it possible that the 
 "Fatherland" is gaining what the 
 " Motherland" is losing in manly state- 
 craft? Certain it is that Germany 
 would very willingly pick up anything 
 in the shape of Colonial territory or 
 influence that England might abandon. 
 
 There was a time, previous to tin- 
 peace of Tilsit, when England was im- 
 plored by the Continental powers to 
 come to their aid against Napole(»n. 
 She refused or delayed and afterwards 
 had to wade through blood, and spend 
 
 1 
 
 ■•■I 
 
 I 
 
18 
 
 itly rtUKiiu'iit- 
 i iriTsist ibh'. 
 iii|>Hsh«'(l iiiul 
 ^ ami <l«'f«'iiil- 
 (•< uraKi>»K its 
 option of tlic 
 
 'S. 
 
 tliat liu'CoI- 
 l)e th«' Hist to 
 •cloKci' union, 
 rt' waiting f»)r 
 mtry. Under 
 •«« can Im' no 
 (» b«' fxpcfted 
 iM'fori' pulilic 
 1 l)y the opera- 
 its Itrani-hes ? 
 u policy. Here 
 on the parent 
 ipparently, on 
 ;ie Iji'a^^ue in 
 » on the Com 
 lit provoking 
 iOiulon. How 
 is sliifting ami 
 es ? 
 
 I'y Salatlin to 
 iders seeketh 
 ig." Schiller 
 " He who de- 
 lU accomplish 
 erman saying 
 is half won." 
 iiiits its action 
 ssihle that the 
 iig what the 
 n manly state- 
 hat Germany 
 k up anything 
 il territory or 
 night abandon, 
 revious to the 
 igland was iiii- 
 ital powers to 
 list Napoleon, 
 md afterwards 
 uod, and spend 
 
 niilliotis to «<*coni|)lish. almost singh' perience teaclies?" or is if only lo 
 
 linnde.l, the lihei-atioii of Kni-ope. Fs licr residt in conMiniing the adage, "lie 
 
 future Colonial policy to he one of that will not while he may shall not 
 
 which we should he able to say '* Kx- when he will y 
 
 CHAPTKR H. 
 
 Nationalities and Nations. 
 
 The most superficial observer of the 
 political events of the last fifty years 
 can hardly fail to have noticed that thi' 
 tendency of the age is towards the 
 foi-mntion of larger an<l more powerful 
 n.itional aggregates. What the cause 
 of this may be is uncertain. It 
 may result from a desire on the part of 
 small communities to be of greater 
 conse(iiience in the world, or perhaps 
 the object is to reduce the general ex- 
 penses of g(»vernment. But, in any 
 case, the fact remains that national 
 consolidation is characteristic of our 
 times. Where the nature of the case 
 makes it impossible to speak of the 
 autonomy of the new combination, 
 some one nationality, more powerful, 
 intelligent or energetic than the others 
 in it, usually st<*ps to the front and ex- 
 ercises a i)rej>onderating influence and 
 action; a hegemony, and by its nutans a 
 
 happened with Prussia inCJennany an«l 
 Austria among th«' sclavonii- nationali- 
 ties. In the case of the British Km])ire 
 this hegemony is already possesse<l by 
 the United Kingdom, jmd only a very 
 little exertion on her part would seem 
 to be necessary to transform the pre- 
 sent loose connection betw«'eij herself 
 and her colonies into a closer and more 
 i beneficent union, which, ,'or want of a 
 j better name, those who desire it call 
 ■ Imperial Federation. 
 I To denote this clos«'r union one of its 
 I most distinguished advocates, Mr. C 
 ! U, Parkin, who recently visited Austra- 
 lasia as a representative of the Lt'ague, 
 I made much use of tiie expiession "na- 
 ! tional unity." This is, of course, to be 
 regai'ded as e<|uiv.Mlent to Impj-rial 
 Federation, or perhaps as indicating 
 ' the end to which the lattiM- is only a 
 means. The expression is also a most 
 
 nitional union on a broader and more appropriate one for distinguishing that 
 liberal foundation is effected. This has broader national union, such tis fed"r- 
 
14 
 
 Mtioni.stN aim at, from Ho-calli'd Nation- 
 aliHiii, which in reality is only sfcti«)n- 
 aiism or provincialism. It in very 
 ncccsHary in Htudying this whole huI>- 
 ject to draw a vei-y dist inct line between 
 that school of politicans which sees 
 political salvation in the establishment 
 of nnnd)erless independent or send- 
 independent nationalities, in »-entrifu- 
 gal s(*cession or separation, and that 
 other more mo«lern and more reason- 
 able way «>f thinking which discerns 
 Ixitter prospects of political permanen- 
 ce, material iiiipri»v(>ment and nationaJ 
 advancenuMit in what may be called 
 political centripetalism, oi- the cond)in- 
 in^ of nationalities, into ^rt>nt nations. 
 The latter woulil seem t<» be the true 
 direction of political proj^ress. just as 
 in cosmical evolution, nebula' condense 
 to stars, and th<'se again arran^re them- 
 selves in constellations or solarsystems. 
 It is, however, in history, n«)t in astro- 
 nomy, that we find such a record of the 
 past expei||enee of nationalities and 
 nations as will fjuide us in shaping the 
 future of our own country. The fur- 
 ther we go back in history the greatei- 
 do we find the efforts of ntitionalism to 
 havt; been in the cause of liberty, and 
 the more futile the struggles of the 
 naticmality. In more recent times the 
 nationalities, or natioiu*ttes ixs they 
 have been called in a Canadian news- 
 paper, have to a very great extent 
 given place to nations, natch to the 
 advantage of civilization and p«)litical 
 progress. 
 
 It is unnecessary to go back to the 
 first French revolution. The successes 
 and the catastrophes of that epoch ciU- 
 minated at last in the fall of N.ipole<jn, 
 and the collapse of the kingdoms he 
 had created. Tlie patriotic achieve- 
 ments of the nations who rose up 
 against him, the stu])endous sacrifices 
 of England, and the heroism of Water- 
 
 loo did not save the contliH'ut of 
 Europe from afterwards becondng 
 afT1icte<l with all the disi>asesand mean- 
 nesses which attend upon government 
 by petty potentates. Natiunalil y in- 
 surrections were fruit less. aii«l even the 
 revolutions of IHIH ])roduced no lasting 
 beneficial residts. Hut t he disastei-s ul 
 that time seem to have taught thf 
 lesson of a more excellent way, and 
 since then, the binlding up of nations 
 rather than the d«>t bronenieiit of king> 
 has been striven for by the fiiends ol 
 freedomand i'ldightened progress. That 
 this tendency to i'<'sist national disin- 
 tegration, and to favor the citnsolidii- 
 tion of the nationalities has been at 
 work dining the last fifty years will be 
 evidiMit from a reference to certain 
 ev«'nts in Switzerland, Italy, t lie I'nitt'd 
 States, Canada and (Germany. 
 
 I nsui'i'ectionary movements were not 
 always, in past history, the work 
 of socialists and repuidiians, nor were 
 these always directed against monarch- 
 ical govermnent. Switz«'rlaiid affords 
 an instance of this. In iHlTthe F(»resi 
 Cantons rose in rebellion against that 
 repid)lic, and endeavoured tose|)aratc 
 themselves from it. Luzerne, Schwy/. 
 Uri, Unterwalden, Zug, Freiburg and 
 Wallis fornu'd themselvt^s into ii 
 separate union called the "Sonder- 
 bund" to resist the action of the lil)eral 
 cantons which controlh'cl the federal 
 government. The latter had decreed 
 the subjection of the Church tt) the 
 State, the abolition of the convent.- 
 and was detennined to expel the.Iesuit- 
 from the country. When the "Sondei- 
 bund" was formed the goveriuneiit 
 called upon it tf) dissolve. The demand 
 was refused and armed resistance con- 
 tinued, but after their troops were de- 
 feated, and Freiburg and Luzerne 
 taken, the rebel cantons were forced td 
 submit, and the Ultramontanists to 
 
i 
 
 in 
 
 CUIltilD'Ht ot 
 
 irds ItccDiiiiii^ 
 'iiHi'saiid iiiniii- 
 
 Dtl ^OVt'l'MllllMlt 
 
 Natioiinlily iii- 
 ■i.s. and cvfii till' 
 Iu(-<>«1 no iastiiiK 
 
 the disasters ul 
 iv«' taught the 
 'Unit way, and 
 ig up (if iiMt ions 
 ricnicnt of kinK> 
 y tlu' friends ol 
 d proKi't'ss. That 
 
 national disin- 
 »r the cunsolida- 
 »'s has bfcn at 
 fty yt-ars will l»c 
 iMU'c to ('{'I'taiii 
 Italy, thcl'niti'd 
 rniany. 
 
 :'ni«'nts wt'i'c noi 
 lory, the work 
 licans, nor were 
 f^ainst nionarch- 
 itzt'rland affords 
 
 i iHlTtlu' Fori'st 
 on a^^ainst that 
 in-cd to separate 
 u/.»'rn<', Schwyz, 
 g, Freiburg and 
 iiselvi'.s into a 
 till' "Sonder- 
 
 onof the liberal 
 
 >.ive up tht'ir pn'tt'Usions. Tliey were than that of his own kingdom. He 
 
 <il>li><ed to i»ay the (•<»st of the\^ar. to protected t'le exiled Italian paliiots, 
 
 .sid>init to chau^e!? in the eantoiial i-on- broke roinpletely with lit rainontiin- 
 
 J.I ilutions, antl t(»expel the Jesuits from icni. atnl s<piarely opposed Austria's 
 
 itlieir bonlers. The federal i-oiisl it ul ion policy and inter«'s(s. Sardinia hadonly 
 
 IV as likewise lutxlified atid st renf^tlieiied t1\ e millions inhabitants, but the whole 
 
 land the republic consolidated. In ISIS moral power (tf Italy was at its ba<'k. 
 
 ^Switzi'Hand eensed to be a collection of NN'ith the assist^ince of France it ae- 
 
 '>ov»'rei^;n cantons, and became a peace- (|uii'ed Loinl)ardy in iSiM), and so strong 
 
 able and prosperous nation. Thi> seems was the devotion of the Italians to 
 
 to be the first in.-.tajice in histoiv of the national unity that they i^rnored I he 
 
 ,triumph of thespirit of jiationa! unity, provisions of tlu* l*eac«' of Zurich, 
 
 *riie riglit of a republican community to according to which the Italian state's 
 
 Mcede from a federal I'nion wa> etVec- were to form a i-onfedeiacy under tin- 
 
 Vively denied and the rebelling nation- presidt-ncy of the F(tpe, They weie as 
 
 fttes forced to ri'innin united with hostih* to a new federation as to their 
 
 their sister cantons as a nation. little kingdoms anddukedoms, and the 
 
 Nowiiere was the nationalistic spirit result proved tln'ir sagacity. In l."KIl» 
 
 III former times so strong; as in Italy. ' Tuscany, .MoiU'iia and I'arma joined 
 
 .AK'*''" "H'l JiK'"''" '""I *!'<' aspirations of themselves to Sardinia ; (iaribaldi next 
 
 Is'aples and Sicily for sepai'al«' nalional made a pres'-nt of Naples .ind Sicily to 
 
 iir IcKislative existcMice been powerful Victor Fmmanuel, the small potentates 
 
 enough to ruin tHe cause (jf Italian vanished and province after province 
 
 liberty. Hut the year lH.'»flsaw the be- was annexed. In 1H($1 Victor Fmman- 
 
 ginningof a new policy and the lirsi ual became Kin^ of Italy, and at last, 
 
 Kforts towards a hi}<h(U- aim than in 1H71, took p(»sse.ssion of the capital, 
 
 liationetteism. At the Coiij^ress (»f Rome. Thus, by siippressinjj; the spirit 
 
 3'aris, Cavour laid beftire the K''<'iit <>f I»'oviiu-ialisni, the Italians establish- 
 
 Itowei-s th«' demands of the Italians for ; ox\ their nat ional unity, an object which 
 
 iiatictnal existence, and declared that, , the previous sti-uKt^les of the nationali- 
 
 tliitil these were satisfied, a pennanent ties for centuries had failed to accomp- 
 
 li^iropean peace could ncjt be establish- lish. 
 
 ed. Austria then had possession t)f ; The theory of St^-ite KiKhts, which 
 
 tiombardy and Venetia, French troops ' was upheld by the «leiiiocratic paity in 
 
 led the fecU-ral occiii)ietl Home while Naples and Sicily ^ the United States up to the time of the 
 
 ter had decreed \vere in the hands of the successor of civil war, may be reufarded as another 
 
 Church to tli" Kin^ Honiba and the ("amarilla. Italy ; instance of tli(> oci iiii-eiice of a iiation- 
 
 >f the convents .included numerous nationalities, but ; alistic spirit in a republic, detrimental 
 
 expel the.Iesuit- JKeapolians and Florentines, Hoiuans [ to its best interests and even dainjei-ous 
 
 en the "Sonder- 
 
 he government 
 
 . The demand 
 
 resistance coii- 
 
 • troops were de- 
 
 r and Luzeriii' 
 
 is were forced td 
 
 amoiitanists to 
 
 ind Venetians were alike tired of their ! to i 
 petty princes and reactionary ji^overii- theo 
 
 its existence. Accordinj^ to this 
 >ory the IJ^nited Stiites was made up 
 bu'iits, and looked ui)on the title of of a number of sovereign common- 
 
 Italian as higher and prouder than any 
 ihey had previously borne. Sardinia 
 feeeined to them like an oasis in the 
 
 wealths, each capable of t-xercising all 
 legislative and exemitive powers except 
 tliose expressly dt'legated to the federal 
 
 desert. Its King, Victor Eninianuel, I government, and each possessing the 
 cared more for the groatiiessi of Italy right to separate from it at pleasure. 
 
Ifl 
 
 n I 
 
 Thrsf prftf'M.siKDs, ctiinhliicd with otlicr 
 fciK tiotiJi V ililliU'ricr.s wci')' t l>«Taii.s«- of 
 till* iittt'iiipl tliiit was iitiitit' to wirck 
 tilt' |{r|Mil)lir in IS»H, whi'ii tlu- .-Invi' 
 Ntiitco I'or'iiifd t hfiiiHflvfs into n scpnr- 
 iilr ( 'ont'nl ■i-atioii nv "NoiKicrtaind," 
 af'ti'i' tli(^ iiiaiiix'i' of the Swiwh Fori'ht . 
 Caiitoiis ill IKI7. Ahiiost ail tilt' iii- 
 haliitaiils of the Noiitlit rii St4it*-s, coin- 
 prising one-fourth part of tiit* total 
 population of the country, hccanit^ 
 i'(!Ih'1,s, and carric*! on a four years' war, 
 duriiif^ wliich a half a inilUon lives were , 
 Hacriiiced. Ihil the people of the 
 Ignited States knew the valuectf nation- 
 n1 unity, and exerted themselves toihe 
 utmost to preserve it. in th<- end the 
 rni«)n was maintain(>d, the soverei^fn 
 statesdeprivedof theirsoveieij^nty, the 
 doctrine of stat«' rights dest royed. the 
 nation preserved and the laws of the 
 federal K<*v«'rninent made supreme. 
 
 The lesson thus taught, and the whole ; 
 experieiic*' of the I'nited States re^aitl- ^ 
 \nn state rights, were not without their ! 
 inthience on Canadian statesmen, at 
 the time of Confederation which took; 
 place in KSti", shortly after the close of | 
 the American civil war. In tlio British 
 North American \ct the matters sub- | 
 ject to provincial leKisIation are dis- j 
 tinc-tly stilted, as is also the principle j 
 that tli(> Dominion Parliament issupre- ! 
 me. and charj^ed with the control of all j 
 subjects not delegated to the provinces. 
 It is perhaps Ui be regretted that ('on- 
 federation »lid not effect a closer union 
 of the Lower Provinces, aiul avoid the 
 establishment of s.-parate governments 
 and legislatures for Nova Scotia, Xew | 
 Hruiiswick and Prince Edward Island. ' 
 This end the pavment to them and the 1 
 other provinces of hirg«^ subsidies by , 
 the Dominion render any reduction of 
 its customs duties next to impossible. | 
 
 Notwithstanding this. Confederation 
 on the whole has been a decided success, 
 
 ■ iiid in a very marked d«'grei' eondiici\t' 
 to national unity. This was es|»ecially 
 seen in the suppression of the Wii ! 
 ({ebellion. Knlirely of tiieirowii iin 
 tion, and without the aid of Hriti>li 
 troops, the (a iiadin lis restored <irder in 
 the northweHt, and preserv«'d tin' unit \ 
 of their own Dominion and that of tin 
 Kmpire. After such action the po. 
 sibility of successful secession on tin 
 part of any of the provinces is vei \ 
 remote indeed. 
 
 Perhaps the most brilliant instano 
 of the tendency to national consohd.i 
 tion in our age is furnished by tli> 
 (iernian Kmpire. Details are unnect^ 
 sary. The jealousies and hostilities n' 
 the (iernian nationalties have givei 
 place to the unity of the (iernian im 
 tion. Mavarians, Prussians, Saxoii> 
 Hanoverians and Hessians no longi 
 vaunt their resjiective countries. A 
 cry out with Ariidt, "The whole n 
 (iermany it shall be." and declare i; 
 the strains of one of the noblest of w;i 
 songs, "Thou, Iihin«>! shall remain , I 
 (iernian as ourhearis." 
 
 Is there in all this no encourngemen 
 for those who desire the permaneii 
 unity of the Kmpire? Is the desire fc 
 consolidation less powerful in Iiriti> 
 hearts than under a (iernian Kmpire < 
 nn American Republic? Wetrowiin 
 Besides we must' remember that, i 
 point of fact, we now possess union i 
 a certain extent and that our ett'tn-tsai 
 only retpiired t«)wards making tin 
 union more practical and fruitful fi 
 defence and for mutual encourageimi 
 and support in peace or war. In etft'i 
 iiig this there is no necessity for rei|ii: 
 ingthat any of thenati«)ns constitutii 
 th«' British Empire should sacrifice ;ii 
 of Its peculiar characteristics or ii!> 
 
 nil 
 ?f 'I 
 <-l 
 It 
 \\ 
 ol 
 h. 
 
 m 
 
 ti< 
 an 
 th 
 El 
 
 Ca 
 th* 
 
 not 
 
 lat 
 
 Oft 
 
 Ha I 
 
 B!a^ 
 
 hii\ 
 
 Wl 
 
 to 
 
 tutions. Neither do Imperial Fedn 
 tionists desire anything of this soi 
 In fact noninterference with Iih 
 
 tb< 
 
 ist> 
 
 met I 
 b(> 
 
 ■oni 
 «ny 
 
 I: 
 
 t&e 
 
 niriid 
 
 fill-e 
 Stell 
 peril 
 Mac( 
 With 
 Of f ( 
 
 '! ' 
 ;i i 
 
 J 
 
H was fs|M'ciiill\ 
 1)11 of th«' Hi' I 
 
 if ilu'ir own i 
 
 . aitl of Hiiti>li 
 rt'stnii'tl ol'(l«'l' iu 
 •siTVt'iHIu'unitv 
 11 ami that of tli' 
 mtinii Ww V<>- 
 
 S«>(M'Ksi(>ll »>U til' 
 
 i-»)vinc«'H is v»M\ 
 
 hiilUaiit instant, 
 itional lonsolidi 
 uinislu'd l»y <•" 
 tails art" unnrn > 
 
 anil h«>8tiliti<'s<i 
 Itifs Imve givci 
 ,f tin* (Jt'inmn nn 
 I'lissians, Saxon- 
 essians no lon^v 
 I- ttmntiit's. A! 
 "The whoh' <■ 
 
 " and (U'daif i 
 tlu- nobh'st of wii 
 i»! shall nnnain ii 
 
 JO cncouragcnHi 
 the pt'vniant'ii 
 Is thf (Ifsire IV 
 )Wfrful in Hiiti'- 
 Joinmn l-'nipiif > 
 it? We trow ni' 
 inenibi'i' that, 
 rt- possi'ss union i 
 that our t'tt'tnts ill 
 uds nuikinK th; 
 il and fruitful t' 
 iial enc-oui-a^t'niti 
 or war. In ettV. 
 t'cossity for roqii; 
 ations «H)nstitutu 
 ihould sacritici" ;ii 
 iicteristics or in> 
 
 17 
 
 rights is one of th«' |»rhicl|tl«'s, ah-fa<Iy past history of th»' world. Still, f»trsnch 
 
 «|iioti'd, of thi' Inipt'i'ial Krdt-ration a I'nion tin- t«'rni "f<'d«'ration" doi's not 
 
 L«'ji^nf. and its journal has all alon^ appear suitahle, and prohnhly no nanii' 
 
 iniiitilairn'd that the arran^t'nit'nt ot will «>ver In* found Ix'tter than the pr«>- 
 
 tlie local h'K'slative and executive sent one of ** Kinpire." If we cured to 
 
 ^nnchincry of each part of the Knipire search far enoiiKh Iwu-k in history we 
 
 ^•oiirerns that part alone. ft has de- n,i^ht douhtless disinter "The Holy 
 
 dined to express any opinion on the Honian Knipire of (icrnian Nati«>ns," 
 
 rliish (piestion, that heinj; a snhjcct as the lU'arest approach to our (-onteni- 
 
 which exclusively concerns t he people plated uiutui of British cotnitries. 
 
 of the I'liited Kinploni. Similarly it Ihit a name of this s«)rt nuKht 
 
 -linlds that Australa.sian I'nion is a ! not conuneiid itself to KukHsIi 
 
 rfiiatter with which Imperial Federa- ears, and our Canadian tra<li- 
 
 'itiniiists, as s[u\\, have nothing to do, tions speak strongly in favor of a 
 
 and there is not the slijjhtest dan>,'«'i' "I'nited Umpire." .M<»st likely the 
 
 that in effecting the Federation of the majority of thecommuinties now living 
 
 Empire any change would he siif^^ested under the I'nion .lack, would he con- 
 
 IIH n-Kards the institutions of any tente<l to he known as forming P'li't of 
 
 Canadian |>rovince, or of any append 
 
 af;e of the IOm|)ii-e in any othei- part of 
 
 the world. Imperial Federation <loes 
 
 "TheTnited British Kinpire," orof the 
 "Ffiited Fmpire of British Nations." 
 As an instance within the Knipire of 
 
 «.f ,.....>.. i ii.|.< . .... .....,......,....■,., I .................... I 
 
 Hot seek and could not accomplish the j the outbreak of that nationalistic tend- 
 tational ohiiteration of any (»f the races j ency which has b(>en stiKinatised in 
 of the lOmpire. The ('ana«lians. Austra- this paf)er as antagonistic tothedeve- 
 Bnns, Afric.'inders, West Indians and lopmeiit of a lar^e and liberal national 
 Bast Indians would, each of them, still life. Queensland may be mentioned. 
 Ilave their sep.irate national existence, I This younj^est Bi-itish colony has 
 which Fedeiation would tend far more ' I'ecently accpured .some notoriety. In 
 ■*" " " ' "" its review of the occui-reiices in I.SHJS, 
 
 to pres<'rve than to de.sti'oj 
 would be t 
 •h Imperial 
 How would it be chai 
 
 What th(>n would be the nature of which concerned the Coloi.ies, the 
 the I'nion which Imperial Federation- Tiitics ^nvf the folUiwiiiK'is part of th'.^ 
 
 ,».. ...... .»v. ....„ , , .1 ..-record: "Queensland has declnuu ;, 
 
 cterised ? If a clo.ser Imperial I'nion "ratify the Naval Defence Hill, which 
 i» brought about, it will and must be 1 " has been adopted by the othei- 
 
 itts aim at? 
 
 act 
 
 1x 
 
 aomethinK altofjrethei- dilTerent fron 
 iBiy soi-t of "federation' which has 
 
 Austi-alian >?overmnents, as well as 
 " by the Imperial I'jii'liameiit, and has 
 
 --^.- , , - 
 
 f listed in the past. With Canada "since compelled the withdrawal of 
 ready confederat^'d, jindothei- j^i-oups "Sii- Hem-y Hlake. whos<' appointnu>nt 
 t British Colonies inclined to forsake ' "as jrovernoi" had been announced, 
 e nebulous condition, their closer "and in wlios** place .Sirllenry Nor- 
 Wiion with the other parts of the Km- ' "man luus been nominated." 
 
 ^ ire would form a most brilliant con- , While indebted 
 stell.ntion in the i)olitical he.-ivens, or ' Country for th( 
 
 to the Mother 
 securitv of its 
 
 I ' " , ... V ........ ^. .... . .., . , ^, ... ..... 
 
 , perlia])s a newsolar system, asSir.Iohn coasts and shipping?, Queensland aims 
 o Imperial e( « Jfacdonald snp:af<'sts ; a central power [ at depiiviuK her of almost the only 
 hing or tins ^( . ^jtj, .,„xilliary nations; a confederation j right remaining to the Crown in a 
 
 .'n< 
 
 ;e witl 
 
 .• '"" ................ ...f,... .V...........f^ ... ...V ......... ... .. 
 
 federations without a parallel in the British CtWony, the appointment of the 
 
wsm. 
 
 18 
 
 (lovernor. Not only so Imt it is said 
 to be governed by men phfdged to 
 affect its separation from tbe Empire, 
 a project wbicb would diminish the 
 lui'er by about oiu^-thirteenth part 
 of its area, and about one-thous- 
 andth part of its population. One 
 Queensland newspaper urges the 
 discussion of thecpiestion in order that 
 '* the more friendly and easy niay be 
 "the sc^parallon when it comes," and 
 anothei', according to Sir Charles 
 Dilke, has described llu' view of the 
 present premier as being that the 
 British Cabinet and the Colonial Office 
 are a pack of old women, and the 
 Mother Country "a composite grand- 
 " mothei'ly old wi'eck . . . tottering 
 "with a handbaganda cotton and)rella 
 " towards an open grave." 
 
 Truly theassuranc<' and waywardness 
 of this scantily-populated fiagment of 
 the Kmj)ire is immense. It seems 
 resolved to reputliate the solemn vows 
 made by loyal sponsoi-s for it at its 
 bajitism, i-efuses t(j be confiiined and 
 wishes to follow after strauLa' gods. It 
 appccars ambitious tobeconn' the South 
 Cnroiina of the Empire, U^ use tall 
 words, eat fire, and inaugiu'ate a rebel- 
 lion, at least on paper. .Just as there 
 were in the United States men who 
 pnidainuHl the i-iglit of each State to 
 secede, so thei-e have been* Englishmen 
 partic\ilarly anxious to tell tiu' colonies 
 that they might go when they pleased. 
 The residt ha'^ been to ])roinote the 
 growth of lU'rnicious iilens in certain 
 colonial connnunites. In the United 
 States such doctrines were resisted and 
 stamped out by a sanguiniiry war. 
 They were legarded as destructive of 
 the existence of a nation which the 
 United States claimed to be. Can they 
 be permitted to spread with<iut danger 
 to the existence of our Empire i' The 
 secession resisted successfully by denio- 
 
 •cratic America. can suri'ly be su]ipresse(l 
 
 I with gr»'ater consistency and equiil 
 effect by nionarchic.il England, or by 
 
 , nations of (Jreater Britain. 
 
 There is really no other ground for 
 reasonable Britons to take in this 
 matter than ^that expressed by Sii 
 Julius Vogel: "I do not believe il 
 " would be oi)en to any gr'eat colony tn 
 "leave the Mother Coimtry, any more 
 
 I " than it is open to Ireland to do so." 
 (Jrant the right of secession, and inter- 
 minable troul)les arise, leading to coni- 
 plications and wars far more disastrous 
 than coidd |)ossibly follow from main- 
 taining the Unity of the Empire now 
 and at all hazards. But are we to per- 
 
 ! mit the .seed of disintergation to be 
 sown, and eventstodrift until civil war 
 ensues: until the balkv horses become 
 lunnanageable, and we have to under- 
 take the task of whipi)ing ji colony 
 back into the traces? This is what the 
 
 United States had to do, but can we 
 
 i 
 
 not learn from such reiu-nt history ': 
 Is there not statesiiianshij) left in Eng- 
 land to steer clear of such a catas- 
 trophe? 
 
 "As a man soweth that shall he also 
 rejij)." The text a])plies ecpially well to 
 nations. Foi-ty years ago England in 
 arranging her fiscal affaii-s, did so in ii 
 manner uttei'ly regai-dless of the com- 
 mercial interests of her colonies, and 
 has ever since, in matters of trade, 
 treated them like alien conumniities, 
 Is it surpi'ising that some of them 
 should now feel and act as such? Nn. 
 indeed ; the wonder is that the loyal 
 sentiment in the colonies should ha\i 
 such wonderful vitality, when the in- 
 difference of many of the ruling state's 
 men in the Mother Country is consider- 
 ed. Far worse I'esults were predicted 
 by the liistorian Alison who says: 
 "Such distant dei)endencies, fornung a 
 " vast Empire with tUe ocean for its in- 
 
 \f. 
 
19 
 
 ■ l)t'sii]i])r(?ss('(l 
 
 cy Jind o(|U!il 
 
 jif^^laiul, «)!• by 
 
 in. 
 
 li'v jj^ruund for 
 
 take in this 
 t'sst'd by Sii 
 not believe il 
 fr-eat colony to 
 itry, any nioic 
 land to do so." 
 iion, and intei- 
 I'ading to coni- 
 lore disastrous 
 w fron» niain- 
 e i'hnpire now 
 
 are we to per- 
 .'rjj:ation to be 
 
 until civil wai 
 horses bei'onic 
 have to inider- 
 j)ing a colony 
 bis is what the 
 lo, but can we 
 jcent history / 
 
 lip left in Kuf,'- 
 
 sucb a catas- 
 
 "terior line of coinnnniicat ion. (in({ 
 
 • lirh! tixjrilirr hi/ the .strung hoiiil of 
 •■ miihut/ iiiffnut, may, if ruled by 
 
 • w isdoni and <lirecttd by foresij^ht, 
 •• lonj^ l)id di'fianct' to the open or covert 
 
 • hostility of foicij^n })o\vei's. Divided 
 
 • by the neglect or irritated by the sel- 
 •llsh legislation of the parent State, 
 
 • (le|)iivi'd of the strong iiond of nui- i 
 "tual interest arising from pr«»tected 
 '•industry, cast adiift upon the world, 
 •and exposed to (he competition of 
 •• loreign count lies, the lOmpire of which 
 
 ■ t iiev from a part will speedily fall to 
 •pieces, Ix-cause the ruling power at 
 •■ home, to gratify separate interests in 
 
 "the dominant island, has neglected 
 '•the mission appointed for it by I'ro- 
 '•vidence, and ceased to i>enelit the 
 •■ human race.' 
 
 The momentous (piestions of to-day 
 .ifc these: How can, "the ruling power 
 at home," repair tlu' damage which 
 Ihitish Uimy has sustained, aiul induce 
 
 such colonies as Queeusl., iid willingly 
 to remain part of the lOmpiie, and liear 
 its share of the burden of dt'fending 
 a? ("an this burden be placed on the 
 shoulders of the colonies in such a 
 nuxnner as to encourag*' them to bear 
 it? 
 
 It is useless in the case of a disalTect- 
 ed colony toap|)eal to sentiment alone. 
 A plan nnist be brought foiward which 
 will, at the saint time, recommend it- 
 s»'lf to the interest of the w licde l';m|)ire. 
 Such a measure has been suggested and 
 will have full consideration in this 
 essay. Meanwhile it is encouragiug to 
 j observe some evidenci- of a retiun to 
 I reason on the part of tlie statesmen of 
 Queensland. Its I'epresentatives at the 
 Federation Conference, in Australia 
 iield in February last, were (pn'te lare- 
 ful and moderate in their language, and 
 strongly approve*! of the j)rop<ised 
 AustriUasian I'Vderafion under the 
 IJj'itish Crown. 
 
 it shall he also 
 e(pially well tc 
 igo England in 
 lirs, did so in ji 
 'ss of the com- 
 i" colonies, am 
 ters of trad<'. 
 
 comnnuiities. 
 Sonu> of them 
 as such ? Nil, 
 
 that the loyal 
 i»'s should ha\i 
 •, when the in- 
 e ruling states- 
 it ry iseonsider- 
 were pi-edictcd 
 I who says : 
 icies, forming a 
 jcean for it« in- 
 
 C'lIAPTEK 111. 
 
 A Retrospect and its Lesson. 
 
 iJeforeconsidei'inghow (heconsolida- histoi'y is not a very attraclivt- s\tbject: 
 lion of the p]mpirecan be effected most but if we digest its hitter lessons, they 
 easily, it would seem advantageous to inay show us the dangns througli 
 lake a look backward at the i)rogress j which we have i)assed and strengthen 
 of the idea, and to do st) from a Cana- us when the time for action ai-rives. 
 dian point «)f view. Thus regai-ded, we About two cent»u-ies ago, (Ji»'at Hri- 
 soon become aware of the fact that] tain and her Colonies on the Atlantic 
 our movement is not of yesterday, and j Coast began to find that the business of 
 that there has ijeen ret rogres.sion in it settling the country was a very pre- 
 as well as advancement. Indeed its 1 carious one. Raids and requisitions by 
 
20 
 
 ■I' 
 
 th«> Indians of the west, and the French 
 «)f the north, entirely dissipated any 
 prospect of profit, or (!ven of peaceahle 
 possession. An unsatisfactory state of 
 affairs continued tintil, by the capture 
 of Quebec and the conqjiest of Canada, 
 the Motlier Country was aVde to secure 
 the thirteen Colonies against attack, 
 and make them a country worth living 
 in. Scarcely was this done, however, 
 when these same Colonies revolted and 
 svt up in business for themselves, after 
 undufifully appropriating the premises 
 and st,ock which had cost Great Britain 
 so much blood and treasure. This ac- 
 tion was not followed by any offer to 
 pay for the business they had taken 
 possession of. On the contrary, they 
 went to greater lengths, and turned 
 out of the establishnurnt those em- 
 ployees who had been faithful to the old 
 firm, and who did not npprove of the 
 summary methods which the junior 
 partners had adopted, in getting the 
 Atlantic business into their own hands. 
 The people thus expelled were the 
 United Kmpire Loyalists, who, as stated 
 by Hobei't (J rant Ilaliburton, "had for 
 " more than eight years fought through 
 "a wi'iiry civil war, and had risked 
 "their lives, their all, for the English 
 "Crown. In 17S;^, when the treaty 
 " was signed no amnesty was se- 
 "ciu-ed f()r them, and nioi-e than fifty 
 "thousjind scapegoats of British diplo- 
 "niacy, men, wonu*n and children, 
 "were driven into the wilderness" of 
 the noi'th and the noi'thwest. Theii- 
 story tills us with grief, pity, and a 
 righteous indignation. But their 
 struggles for a United Empire and 
 their faith in its ultimate establishment 
 shine through the mist of the j)ast 
 century, to guide us onwards in the 
 l)ath which they were the first to ti-ead. 
 It is true that this faith of the United 
 Empire Loyalists did not bear inunedi- 
 
 ate fruit. Indeed, so barren was it of 
 results that it has since been spoken nl 
 as their dream. In course of time ;; 
 generation of statesmen rt>se up who. 
 we must charitably suppose, nevei 
 heard of their story or their dream. 
 At least it was left entirely out of con 
 sideration in England's dealings with 
 her Colonies, and when the time came 
 for granting them responsible govern- 
 ment. 
 
 F^qually oblivious wereEnglishstates- 
 men of the interests of a United Empirr 
 in some of the treaties made regarding 
 our boundaries. To this day the Asli- 
 Uui'ton Treaty is by every Canadian 
 regarded as a proof of English indiffer 
 ence. Her statesmen of that time seem 
 to have thoiight, although they did not 
 say, what Louis XV, said, but did not 
 think, when he signed away Canada: 
 " It's only a few acres of snow." Look- 
 ing at a map of North America, therf 
 is to be perceived what looKs like a big 
 bite out of Canadian territory at tb»' 
 place where lies the State of Maim-. 
 \Vh«'n that was ceded to our neigli- 
 boiu's, we not oidy lost "a few acres ot 
 snow," but that old bite cost us a few 
 nnllions of pounds extra in building 
 the Intercolonial Railway away round 
 to the north of it. The State of Michi- 
 gan was another bite taken out of us. 
 and it was especially hard t«) lose it.- 
 northern peinnsula, between l^iikes 
 Michigan and Superior, one of the rich- 
 est mijieral regions in the world. Thai 
 concession cost us a few more millions 
 in carrying the Canadian Pacific Rail 
 way I'omid the north shore of Laki 
 Superii>r. Later on, the Oregon terri 
 toiy was yielded i ,, N) our enterprising 
 cousins, and the saUiC railway was in 
 conse(iuence obliged to cross the Selkirk 
 range, instead of following the natural 
 route down the Columbia Hiver. All 
 these concessions were made by Eng- 
 
21 
 
 bnrron was it of 
 ■ been spoken nl 
 oiii'se «tf tiiiH' ;: 
 n r(>se up whn. 
 suj)posi', ncvci 
 )!• their dreajn. 
 rely out of f()ti 
 s dealings witli 
 1 the time came 
 onsible goveni- 
 
 eP^nglish states- 
 United Empire 
 made regarding 
 is day tiie Asli- 
 very Canadian 
 English indiffer 
 ' that time seem 
 igh they did not 
 lid, but did not 
 : away Canadii: 
 f snow." Look- 
 America, theie 
 looKs like a big 
 ,erritory at the 
 State of Maine, 
 to our neigli- 
 **a few acres ol 
 e cost us a few 
 ra in huilding 
 ay away round 
 State of .Michi- 
 aken out of us. 
 lard to lose its 
 et ween Ijjjkes 
 )ne of the rich- 
 world. That 
 more millions 
 n Pacific Rail 
 iiiore of Lak( 
 Oregon terri- 
 i!' enterprising 
 ailway was in 
 OSS the Selkirk 
 ng the natural 
 a Hiver. All 
 made by Eng 
 
 l;»M(l in ifilei- to |>le;i-^e the I'nited 
 .'^i.iies. iititl f'>r t be ])urp(>se (if securing 
 pe.u-e with them, ('an it bi- said that 
 l!ie Amei'lcnn- have made as many 
 s.H'i'itifes for the same object ? 
 
 Nor ili<l Canadian cummercial intef- 
 es(s fai-e any betti'i- (Iian boimdary 
 
 I ((uestinns. There was a time in the 
 liistory of (ireal Hi-ifain when practice 
 and expcrit'iice were T-egarded as the 
 true rouridalion for 'Ix'ory in every 
 department of indnsti-y and statecraft. 
 
 ;. }»ut al>out the ye:ir 1HK>. a tendency 
 was developed on the part of some of 
 our siatesmen to work in tlii' opposite 
 dii-ect ion. Tiii'iiing the inductive 
 method upside down, they detei-mined 
 toui;ikr' facissin'.;;;-!' with theirtlu'oTMCs. 
 'J'hey assumed that certain principlesof 
 trade which they regarded as unassail- 
 able, would produce certain iienelicial 
 reailts everywhere, and under all cir- 
 cumstances. And so the policy of free 
 impiti'ts was adojtted, uhicli was tlie 
 cause of nuich conunercial emb;irr-iss- 
 nicnt in Canada, cari-icd distress even 
 into her b.-ukwoods, and, to a large ex- i 
 toit. provoked the amiexation moxc- 
 ment of 1S1!». 
 
 It would be out of pl;u-e here to dis- 
 cuss the merits of rrotcction and Free 
 
 Trade. Federationists may proj)erly 
 take the position that each sect ion of 
 tlic lanjiire is free to adoi)t the prin- 
 ciples oft he one system or the other, as 
 tl'.ey may tliink fit. Ihit it is surely 
 ni.itter for i-egi'et that the Fi'ce Tratle , 
 a'.ritaiors of forty years ago win'e so! 
 li. ad strong as to give to the (■t)l()nies 
 scint consider.'ition. and so unpatriotic 
 as to anticipate with sat isfaclion a dis-; 
 nienibernient of the ilnipii-e. Col)den j 
 himself s.'ii'.l: " The Colonial system. ^ 
 "with all its da/./.ling appeals to the 
 *' )>assions of the peoi)Ie, can never be 
 " got rid of exc(>pt by the iiuiirect ]>ro- \ 
 "cess of Free Trade, which will grad- j 
 
 "ually and imp(>rcept ibly loost-n the 
 "bonds which unite oiu' Colonies to us 
 " l)y ;i mistaken notion of self-interest." 
 Tilt apostle of Free Ti'ade visited 
 Fg> p , (ii'cece, France, Italy, .Vusti-ia. 
 Prussia, and twice he rrossed the ocean 
 to the United States in ordei- to impreg- 
 nate these countries with Free Ti'ade 
 doctrines, hut he m-ver visited a Mritish 
 colony, Ol- made any j)roj)osal for im- 
 pi'ovinj; the commercial relations be- 
 tween thetn ind the .Mot lier Count ry. 
 Even as late as iStM, Cobdeii wrote: 
 " I cannot see what substantial interest 
 "the British i)eople ha ve in the coiuiec- 
 " t ion to compensate them foi-guaran- 
 " teeing three or foui' miilioiis of North 
 " Americans living in Canada against 
 "anothei- conunuu'ty of Americans 
 "living in their ni'ighbourhood. To 
 "defend these Colonies is a task !)<•- 
 " yond our jxiwei'. We h.ive rer'ognis- 
 "ed theii' I'ight to control their own 
 ••fate, even to the point of assei'ting 
 "theii- independ'Mice whenever they 
 "think fit, and which we know to be 
 " oidy n (piestion of time." Cobdeii 
 died two months laKu-. How melan- 
 choly to reflect that this should h.ave 
 been till' theme of the last nttei'ances 
 of a man of such genius and power! 
 After- Cobden's death some of his fol- 
 lowers continued to argue in favor of 
 tlu' dismemberment of the IOin|»i!'e. 
 They did not seem to perceive that this 
 was eipuva'cnt to nation.il suiciile. 
 Canada was especially the oliject of the 
 sneers and disfavour of the Manchestei" 
 si'hool. while tin- l'iiit<'d Stales, al- 
 though cai'rying to far greatei- ex- 
 tremes the pi'actical apj)iic;;t ion of the 
 ]>rotective principles which these poli- 
 tical economists condenuied, was look- 
 ed u|)on as the pattern nation, ^'et, 
 while the latter, on moi-e than one 
 occasif)n, displayed fe, lings di-iinrt!y 
 hostik' to England, faithful Canada 
 
'J%<, 
 
 »» 
 
 W'jis able to say, at each saerifict' of her i 
 tei'rit«»ry or interests by tbe Motbei- 
 Country, "yea, tliougb sbe slay me, 
 yet will I trust in ber." Indifference 
 on the part of our English Ciovernnient 
 to the welfai-e of the Colonies untler 
 oi'dinary circunistanees appears suHi- 
 ciently inexplicable, but, in the case of 
 Canada, and considering the proximity 
 of the United States, it aniounis to 
 something like "veiled treason. ' Here 
 was ('anada, for a series of years, ex- 
 posed to the temptation of surrender- 
 ing her position in the Uritish Empire, 
 and of changing her allegiance for ap- 
 parent material advantage, while those 
 who plotted to absorb hei-, and even 
 winked at an invasion of her tei-ritoi-y, 
 were received with favour and contl- 
 denc-) by tlui only powei- to which 
 C-anada could look f(jr sympathy niuX 
 aid. 
 
 The American leanings of English , 
 statesmen were well display(Hl in the 
 negotiations connected with the Treaty 
 of Washingtori when tiie claims of 
 Canad'i for compensation for the 
 Fenian raid losses were set aside. This 
 indifference to a United Enii)iie policy 
 reached siuh a state about eighteen 
 years ago, that the Hon. .losejjh Howe ; 
 expressed himself in this way:— "Of 
 "late newdoctries have been expound- 
 "ed in the Mother Country. The dis- ; 
 "organisation of the Em])ire has been 
 " openly pronndgated in leading and 
 "influential organs of public sentiment 
 "and opinion. Our brethren within 
 " the narrow seas have been coiniselled 
 "to adopt a narrow })olicy ; to call, 
 "h...ue their legions, and leave the out- 
 " lying provinces without a show of | 
 "sympathy or protection. One('abinet 
 " Minister tells us that British Ameri- 
 "ca wuinot be defended, and another 
 " that he hopes to set> the day when the 
 " whole coutiuent of America will 
 
 "peacefully repose and pros|)er under 
 " I^epublican institutions, I do no', 
 "(h'sire to anticipate the full and anipli' 
 "discussion which Parliament will givi' 
 "to England's recent diplomatic effori> 
 "to buy her own peace at the sacrifice 
 "of our interests, oi- of that comedy 
 "of errors into which she has blundei'- 
 "ed; Init this 1 may say, that tlu' tinu- 
 "is rapidly approai Iiing when Cana- 
 " dians and Englishmen nmst have ;i 
 "clear and distinct understanding a> 
 "to the hopes and obligations of the 
 " future." No apology is neces>iai'y tor 
 this lengthy tpiotation, which correctl> 
 represented the feelings and UtiiVH at 
 that time of many besides the vetei.iii 
 statesman of Nova Scotia, who ha^ 
 long situe p.-jssed to his resc. W'heti lie 
 gave utterance to those v ords the pros- 
 pect nuist iiuleed have seemed dark te 
 a U}iited Empire Loyalist. One oi 
 them, Haiibiuton alieady (pioted, 
 bitterly says regai'ding tin* views oi 
 English statesmen of that period: "A 
 " panacea has been suggested whicii 
 "has the double merit of being aii 
 "etfectual remedy and a good specula- 
 " tion. The nation is advised to cut it- 
 " throat to save itself the cost «if living.' 
 and ho compari's a nation t .lat ((iuiil 
 follow such a«lvice to the man "who 
 "was so mean that he cut off one oi 
 "his feet to save himself in shoe 
 "leather." 
 
 The CJermans say, "when the neeil 
 is greatest then the help is nearest, 
 and very soon after this time we havt 
 evidence of a reaction. But, in truth. 
 th(> great heart of England nevei 
 seiMously thought of dismembering tii( 
 Empire, and her weak-kneed statesmen 
 found they had reckoned without tla-ii 
 host, that they had matle a huge mis- 
 take in even hinting at such a thing. 
 Howe spoke in 1872 ; shoi-tly af terwaril.- 
 the tide began to turn, and our own 
 
i% 
 
 1(1 prosper umliT 
 )n.s. I do iioi 
 jc full ami aiiiplf 
 ijuiit'iit will fjrivf 
 iplomutic eH"oii> 
 ' at the saci'itiii- 
 of that foiiH'dy 
 she has hliuuli'i- 
 LV, that tlu' tiiiif 
 ing when Caiia- 
 t'li imist havr ii 
 iiuk'rstanding a^ 
 l)li^atior\s of the 
 ,• is nccc.s.sai-y t'oi 
 , which coiTcctl) 
 igs aiul "cars at 
 ^idt's the vetci.iii 
 icotia. wlio has 
 s resc. W'ht'ii he 
 «' V ords tht'iu'os- 
 ' st'ciiu'il dark td 
 )yalist. One o! 
 ilready quoted. 
 ))jj the views oi 
 that period : "A 
 >uj?K*'^'*'*^l which 
 rit of heing an 
 a ^ood speenla- 
 Ivi.sed to cut it- 
 leeostJif living.' 
 ation t.iat eoulil 
 the man '* whe 
 Ic eiit ol¥ one el 
 iniself in shoe- 
 
 r when the neeii 
 jelp is ni'arest,' 
 lis time we have 
 I$\it, in truth, 
 I England nevii 
 nnemhering thi' 
 :need statesmen 
 hI without their 
 ule a luige mis- 
 It such a thing, 
 [rtly afterwanl- 
 1, and our own 
 
 rrciiiier, wluMi reviewing the situatiiui 
 
 ill l.ST'j, was ahle to make this stat«'- 
 
 mrnt : " W*- have got the pledge of the 
 
 • Motlier Country and, us I said he- 
 
 •I'ure, that ple«lge has never Imh-ii 
 
 ••t)roken that the whole power of the 
 
 ■' I'wnpire will lu'cxerted in our tlef«'nee 
 
 I -if occasion sliouM reipiire." This 
 
 I .^.une speech contained the germ of the 
 
 ; present movement, although at that 
 
 time the term Fi'deratinu had not been 
 
 iincnted for it. Let us hear what tlie 
 
 same veteran st.'ite-nian. (tur "old 
 
 :|p.irliameiitary hand" .said about the 
 
 ^CKUsolidation of the Kmi)ire litteen 
 
 \\ears ago: "As ti> tlie futm-e of 
 
 ••Canada, I have long held very deeid- 
 
 "e<l opinions, and these lead m«! to be- 
 
 ••lie\e that England will he tlie central 
 
 '•power, with auxiliarv nation.s tlu^ 
 
 "Colonies in alliance with her; 
 
 *• when we would have less of depend- 
 
 ■"eiu-e and more of an alliance; we 
 
 •• woidd all b(> united uiuler the .same 
 
 ■•.Sovereign, and all owe allegi.ince to 
 
 "the .same Crown ; all inspired by the 
 
 " Ilritish spirit, and bound togethei- by 
 
 "an alliance offensive and defensive.' 
 
 Tills may not mean Imperial Fedei-a- 
 
 tion, but it is possible to claim it as 
 
 foretelling the consolidation of the 
 
 Kmpire befoi-e the end of th(> pre.sent 
 
 flit'entury. Not longaftei wards Sir John j 
 
 IMacdonald proposed his "National i 
 
 I'olicy," and regained power on thei 
 
 Htrength of it. He tlirew aside thej 
 
 llulvice of the Manchester School who | 
 
 '•" persi.stently entreat mankind to re- 
 
 ■*" gulate their conimercijil atfairs on 
 
 ■**tlie a.s.sumptiim that the entire race 1 
 
 ••of man is but a band of brothers,"! 
 
 »nd adoiited M. Thiers principle:! 
 
 "among the most sacred rights is that 
 
 "of the labour of a country to its own 
 
 " markets." Even at this time the idea 
 
 of a closer union had its advocates and 
 
 f found expression, as the following ex- 
 
 tract from the Montreal O'i/.r<7/cof \>i 
 March, 1S7J>, will shew: - 
 
 To (hr Ui{iht Uon. Sir John A. Mufil'inalil. 
 K.C.li.. <t'c., «£•('., lit the ojxitiiij/ of i'mliii- 
 nil lit, Fchitiitvy, W.> :— 
 
 As ne'er Ijcfore with poweriunl honniirei'invued. 
 
 'I'li.m entert'st our lejjfis'ative luill^; 
 
 'I'liixurh (liiiiii'i'rs ttiiclien. (lisciiiUeiUM a1)()Uiul. 
 
 Yet <'onllii<MU t() llieo tlie n.ition ealls 
 
 \\ olconie, I'rcMiior! The Crown luul people's 
 
 choiee. 
 To caeli of tlieiii be loya and sincere, 
 As to (Jill's jiroN iiience ; their hleiideil voieo, 
 Tlie voice of British law do Mioii revei-e. 
 
 Hind lis ■•li'l e'oser to that dear old laiiil 
 The nurse of nation.s; niiKtresK of the world 
 .Make our dcfeiieo her own ; make us to stand 
 In her defence where'^-r llio flap's uiii'ui I'd. 
 (Quench not the Kii:okin.<,' flaN of iialrioi zeal 
 That snioulderH 'niongsi uur gallant voinnicois, 
 Hut nurse, encourage it; ritlo and sleei 
 May prove of serviee in u few short years. 
 
 Protect our mines and forestis; our bi.jad lunds 
 Let hardy settlers freely sow and reap ; 
 fnito our Provinces with iron l)andn. 
 Our lakes ami streams with ehanne's hroad and 
 
 deep. 
 For all such blessinKs we will Uiil and pay 
 .\ willinj^ tribute on o\ir dearest nf^eds, 
 For rich and poor alike do bless the ilny. 
 When trade revives and enteriirise sueeeedii. 
 
 Defend our laboura first ! tho aliens foil ! 
 .Vea.sure for nieasurc nietcthem; fearless wield 
 Tlie lij-rhteous power; let even Uritaiiis soil 
 He foreiKii while our homes and hearths yon 
 
 shield, 
 .•^till ; to the mother fain her sons would briny 
 The fairest fruits their labours can attain ; 
 Oh! may she yet regard the olFering 
 As worthier, better than all foreign gain. 
 
 To patriotic view all o'er the earlli 
 
 A prospect marvellous and wide expands 
 
 Dear to rc'igion and to hunuin wuriii 
 
 The clo.ser union of all Mritish lands. 
 
 Further such aims thou leader great and bold, 
 
 .So shall thy fame o'er tliese same lands be 
 
 spread. 
 Thy work to generations still be told 
 \Vhcn thou art numbered with the glorious 
 
 dead. 
 
 Six years afterwards the Canadian 
 militia shewed in the North-west the 
 
TfT 
 
 21 
 
 v.'ilucfif " I'iflc jMul steel " roi'tlieiinil y 
 of the I)()Miiiii<in, iiiul a better work 
 still vvns (loDe a year later when the 
 Canadian F^ieifie Hailway was cdin- 
 pleted, and with it the " iron hands " 
 Avhieh hind the ])r()vin(es to^'ether. 
 This was, nioreovr'r, as gi-eat a deed us 
 had evei- before been v/roii^ht for the 
 Unity of the Enij)ire, and deserved to 
 lu'comnieniornted, as was attein])t(^d in 
 the followir.jj^ lines which aj^jieared in 
 the Ottawa CiH.-cn of IMth October, \ 
 IHSH: - i 
 
 To Sir John Mnrdonald on /i/.v r< turn from 
 liriti.tli Cohnnhia, Si'jifiiiitirr, issn, I 
 
 Froin (iu( Dm' youthful West, riiili:in( witliliopc, 
 WbcresmooLli I'acitJclavcH \'iiii»,'ouver'H wliores. 
 VV'licre Kiiiiit. tiinljcr clothiiH tlio iitiKlity h1uj)0, 
 \V"lier(^ luiiiKtl, bridt^e iiiid rail tiniiRk the (ioui's 
 Of jealous inoiiiiluiii pasnUN, lliou didst come; 
 Oil iron wiiM];s from out tin; setting siiii 
 lirinffiiij^ tliy slicnvus; wldlc ouch (.'anadian 
 
 homo 
 Echoed the cry, "Welcome I I'remior! well 
 
 done 1" 
 
 Henciilh the snowy Selkirkn wiiuls the road, 
 And ]msM llie source of niiiny a Hudson 8lreani, 
 Aeross the fertile belt, tlie new abode 
 t)f future inilliou.s of our coiinlrynicn. 
 Its ruKine. strikes Supi rior'si Uif-^ with awe, 
 Awakes the echoes of the Lnnrcnlides, 
 !-^alutes the tow(T crowned height of (ittawa. 
 And on ttie murt,'in of S'l. I,awrence glides. 
 
 Now East and \'/cst arc one; thy faitli suhlinio 
 Kcniov'd the inountaiiiti; hound with strongest | 
 
 Htcol 
 Our provinces, west, centra', inaritinie ; 
 And lix'd for centuiies our eouatry's weal. 
 The ancient Host is iiowtlie niodern West ; 
 Far colonies come nearer (liigland's whoro. 
 And {'aimda shall henceforth be confessed 
 The Keystone of the Arch of British power. 
 
 Huge Wius the t^isk ; strong were our country '« 
 
 foes, 
 ■*/ho sought tliy lofty purposes to tliwart; 
 jviny, foul slander, ov'n rebellion rose 
 To disconipoHe Ihy pafrioiie heart. 
 'Mil! grctaicst cotKiuerors eaiuiot subdue, 
 V/ilh all tl'.eir powers, the spite of meaner souls; 
 Well hasl tliou done thy jtart ; so f-hall v^•o too 
 When next doth rage the battle of the polls. 
 
 The shn/lnws lenpthen of Ihy busy life ; 
 Ihit think not that thy warfare yet is o'er; 
 U-aNcuM not yet unguided ii\;lie strife; 
 One ta.-k remains woithy of a i thv power. 
 I niti the IJi.pire! make it stisnd compact 
 Shoulder to shoulder, let lis membersfcol 
 The toMcli of British brotherhood and act 
 As one vast nation, strong and true us steel. 
 
 If, in attcniptirig the Federation nl 
 tlu! Empire, Knglish statesman wonlil 
 handle that bnsiness ;is vi^j^oroiisly a- 
 our.s did the CDnstriiction of the Caiui 
 diaii I\k ific Railway, it mij^ht be pos- 
 sible to complete the work Hve years 
 earlier, and give Sir .7ohn Maedonald 
 and Lord Salisbiuy, and even Mr, 
 Gladstone, an opportunity, while yei 
 in the flesh, of beholdinjjf anothev 
 stupendous task completed in the in 
 terest of the wiu^le I'^mpire and ot 
 Christ ian civilization 
 
 Nine years after the delivery of Sir 
 .John .Maedonald's consolidation speecii. 
 the Impei'ial Federation League wn- 
 organized inuler its first chairman, the 
 Hight Hon. W. E. Forster, who dieii 
 17 months later, on tlie 5th April, LSsO. 
 One of his latest utterances, wh.if 
 might be called his "Swan Song" anu 
 very dilTerent indeed from ('obdi'iTs. 
 was his article on '* Impei ial Feder;;- 
 tion '■ which a])peared in the NinetccHti. 
 Cvnliin/, In view of the progress 
 which hits since been n)ade, many ol 
 his words are prophetic. For instani t 
 he iisked, "' Is it impossible for Lor.l 
 "Derby to write to the (Queen's repie 
 "sentative ut Ottawa, and Sydney, and 
 " Victoria, and Adelaide and Brisbane, 
 "and Auckland, and Hobart Town, 
 "somewhat to this effect : — 'The necc- 
 " isity for re-casting the defences of tin 
 " Eni})iri> is lu-gent. Her Ma jesty - 
 "Ministers wish to take counsel with 
 "your Gov<'rn)nent on the sLej)s to In 
 "taken. Ask your Ministers to eni- 
 " power their agents in London, or, ii 
 
 f*n 
 
buH.v liff! ; 
 .ro yot Is (i'it; 
 it 111) strire ; 
 a 1 thv power, 
 ti'.iul compacl 
 members ftM'l 
 ■hf)nil and aet 
 III true us sU'.ol. 
 
 f FcdciJilioii <it 
 
 ■TtC'SJlliin WOlll;! 
 
 s vifj;()rously .m- 
 )n of tlic Cuiui 
 it iiiiKlit •)•' l><i^- 
 ivork tlvo yeai- 
 r)hn Maccloiiiiii! 
 aiid even Mi. 
 nily, wliile yci 
 oldiiifjj aiHitlic! 
 icLcfl in tlu' ill 
 lOiupii'o and ot 
 
 ' dclivet'y of Sir 
 
 ilidalion spoecli. 
 
 on Li'iigiu' \va- 
 
 t c'hairiiiaa, tin 
 
 Ji'rfttT, who difil 
 
 5tli Ai.ril, 1.S;-<1, 
 
 I'ranci's, whai 
 
 ■ivau Song" aiiu 
 
 "roni Cohdi-nV. 
 
 njK'i ial Ft'dcr.;- 
 
 1 thi' Xini'tcniti: 
 
 f the l)^o^Tl'^^ 
 
 niad(>, many d 
 
 For instaiin 
 
 ssible for Lor.l 
 
 (Queen's it'pi'i • 
 
 lul Sydney, ami 
 
 e and Brishaiu. 
 
 llo))art; Town. 
 
 t:— 'The neto 
 
 defences of t!i' 
 
 Her Majesty- 
 
 ivi' counsel wiJi 
 
 the steps to In 
 
 iinisters to em- 
 
 1 Jiuudon, or, ii 
 
 "they prefer it, to send somo special 
 '" represejitative, to confer with mi'and 
 ••with the rei)reseiitatives of the other 
 *• si'lf-ffoveriiinjj; ( 'olonies. Your Minis- 
 •• icrswillnot he committed to any course 
 f ' recommended by such conference 
 V until they have been informed there- 
 *• of and ai)prove ' " ? Two ytiars after- 
 vards Forster's .su^i:i;estion was foUow- 
 fd by the (loverruneut which succeed- 
 ed to pow«'i'. The Secri'tary of State 
 for the Colonies i.ssued the invitation 
 on the 2r>th of November, 188(5, and on 
 ihe 1th of Api'il, 1.S87, two years 
 pfter I'\>rster's death, the Colonial 
 t'onference actually met. Tliat such a 
 result was attained within three years 
 ftftei- the formation of the hn])erial 
 Federation licaf^ue si)eiiks volumes as 
 ^) the pfreat influence of that society. 
 "" The proceed in,t;s of the Colonial Con- 
 feicnce^of 1887 have been i)ublished, 
 but have not yet received anythinf?like 
 the attention tliey deserve. That the 
 greatest importance wasattached to its 
 deliberations by the statesmen of the 
 Empire is evidi^nt from their expres- 
 sions of approval. Tlie prophecy of 
 Ijoi'd Salisbury has oftt>n been (pioted. 
 He said : " Wi' all feel the gravity and 
 "importance (»f this occasion. The 
 *' decisions of this Conference niav not 
 '!* be, for the moment, of vital impijrt- 
 ♦'anct> ; the business may seem jjrosaic 
 •'and may not issue in any great results 
 "at tlunnoment. IJut we are all sensi- 
 /*' ble that thisnu-eting is the beginning 
 " of a state of things which is to have 
 jP'gi'CMt r(>sults in the future. It will 
 *' be t)ie parent of a long progenituri', 
 ^'and distant councils of the Empire 
 *'may, in some far off time, look back 
 •' to the meeting in this room as the 
 "root from which all their greatness 
 " and all their beneficence sprang." 
 Lord Knutsford spoke as follows :— 
 " Many plans have been devised, 
 
 "many suggestions made for fitting 
 "memorials of lli'r Majestj''s .lubilee 
 "Year; (fiiot lioininrs, tot snih-tifia', 
 "In this <'ountry w have hear'd of au 
 " Imjierial Institute, a Chui'ch Home, 
 " hospitals, fr(>e libiaric-s, and so forth. 
 " IJut I as.-;ert, without fear of contra- 
 "diction, tliat the a.-sen!l)ling together 
 "in this country of leading Colonial 
 "statesmen and npresentatives of 
 "Greater Hiitain to discuss matters of 
 'Imperial inteiest afi'oting alike the 
 " Motlier Country and the Colonies, is 
 " greatest of all memorials.'' The same 
 stfitesman declared at the close of the 
 proceedings that he looked "hopefully 
 "forward to future conferences" and 
 Sir Samuel (I'l'ittiths, the oldest actual 
 Minister pres»>nt, said, "I think we 
 "may look forward to seeing this sort 
 "of infoi-mil Cinincil of the Kmpire 
 "developed until it becomes a legisla- 
 " tive body- at any rate, a consultative 
 "body, and some day, perhaps a legisla- 
 "tive body, under conditions wliich we 
 "cannot now foi-esee, and that indetKl, 
 "meetings such as this will before long 
 "be recognised as part of the general 
 
 i " governing machinery of the Empire." 
 It is imj)ossibl<' to read such words and 
 study the proceedings of this confer- 
 ence without feeling ajul exultingly 
 
 i declaring that with it and its develop- 
 ment the "dream" of the old United 
 Empire Loyalists is in full course of 
 realisation. 
 
 ! Whatevei- may have been the case In 
 
 j the past, it is certainly impossible now 
 to say that Colonial affairs, at least, so 
 far as regards tei-ritorial (juestions and 
 Imperial defence — are not receiving 
 sufficient attention from the Home 
 
 j Government. At the same tim(> it can 
 be maintained that the commercial in- 
 terests of the whole Empire are not 
 now obtaining that amount of con- 
 sideration which almost every other 
 
■■ 
 
 26 
 
 civilised nation in these days feels 
 bound to hcslow on such mutters. And 
 wlijit is tile lesson whieh our pn.st ex- 
 perience, as above related, teaches us 
 rejjardinf? them ? Surely this -that th(! 
 commercial policy which has brought 
 the Kmpirt! to the verge of dismember- j 
 nient and which, there is too much i 
 reason to believe, was devised for this 
 
 very purpose, can no longer bo excused, 
 and, thatoiu- present plan of treatinf; 
 the inhabiUmts of the diffeivnt pail,'- 
 of the Empire, in mattei-s of -trade, as 
 if they wei-c; aliens, and placing them 
 exactly on the same footing as foreign- 
 ers should b(! abandoned at tihe earlie.-t 
 possible moment. 
 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 The Colonial Conference. 
 
 The study of the jiroceedings of the 
 first Council of the Empire is exceed- 
 ingly profitable to those who desire to 
 understand the nature and defects of 
 the present relations betwixt the 
 Mother Country and her Colonies, and 
 who are anxious to see a closer and 
 more serviceable union substituted. In 
 the speeches of the various delegates 
 the disadvantages under which the 
 several parts of the Empire labour at 
 present, and the objects which it is 
 considered desiivible to accomplish for 
 the common weal are plainly set forth, 
 while the obstacl(>s which present them- 
 selves have been as plainly recognised. 
 
 The subjects which were at first offi- 
 cially proposed for the consideration of 
 the conference by the Home (iovern- 
 ment were the organization of syste- 
 
 matic defence and the improvement of 
 postal and telegraphic communication. 
 Political Federation was expressly ex- 
 cluded, but the door was left open for 
 the introduction of any other import- 
 ant (piestion which, in the general opin- 
 ion of the Cohmial Governments, might 
 properly and usefully be brought under 
 consideration. In acctn'dance with 
 this latter supposition, the Colonial 
 Secretary wrote to the Colonial repre- 
 sentatives under date the IDth Mai-ch. 
 1887, as follows:— "I shall be obliged 
 ** by your communicating to me in 
 " writing the subjects which you havt' 
 " b(!en instructed by your Government. 
 '* and which it may bo in your opinion 
 " desirable to bring forward." The 
 representatives of Queensland, Victoria. 
 Cape Colony, South Australia and 
 
27 
 
 <'!• ho excused, 
 n of treatiiif^^ 
 litlVrent pnvU^ 
 ••s of t lade, ii!- 
 jtlaeiiif^ them 
 uff as foi-eifrn- 
 iit the earlie.-1 
 
 provtmient of 
 iiimiiication. 
 
 xpi'essly ex- 
 eft open for 
 ther impoi't- 
 ^•eiieralopin- 
 neiits, might 
 •ought uudej' 
 •dance witli 
 the Colonial 
 olonial repre- 
 
 IDth Mai^ch. 
 11 he ohliged 
 ig to me in 
 ich you have 
 iovernment. 
 yoxir opinion 
 ■wai^d." The 
 lud, Victoria, 
 usti'alia and 
 
 Nittal found themselves ahle to comply j 
 with this reipiest, and a munher of ; 
 ;idilitional suh.jectw W(»re suggested and 
 nftei^wai'ds discussed. In this way the 
 delihei'.it ions of tlu- Conference spread 
 over a very wide i-ange, and it was 
 even found possil)h' to introduce gent- ' 
 lemen i^e])i'eseiiting the W est Indies, 
 and to discuss aiul condeuin the foieigii 
 sugar hounties. licaving out of con- i 
 sideratiou those whicli interest only ' 
 one part icuhn- colony, and ihosi- of a ; 
 legal character, the matti "•s which I 
 came hefore the Conference for (;on- i 
 sidei^ation may be classesl under the , 
 following divisions:— Naval and mili- 
 tary dttfence; postal and telegi^aphic 
 (^oinnumication: inter-hiit is!i trade !•('-' 
 lations; Imperial annexation; the cen- 
 sus throughout the Kini)ire; preserva- 
 tion of life at sea. To refer at length 
 to all these subjects in the course of 
 the present chapter is an impossibility, 
 but there are points of special import- 
 .•iiice to which attention ouglit to be 
 directed. 
 
 The chief sid)ject discussed by the 
 Conference, upo!i which jiositive action 
 was reached, was that of increasing tlie 
 naval force foi^ the protection of the 
 floating trade in Australasian waters. 
 An agreement betwixt the United 
 Kingd(jm and the Australasian Col- 
 onies was arrivedat. subject to ratifica- 
 tion bv their i-espective parliam(Mits, 
 according to which five fast cruisers 
 and two torpedo gun boats were to be 
 liuilt by the Imperial Government and 
 ])laced within the limits of the Austr.a- 
 Lisian stntion. For this defi'uce the 
 Colonies of New South Wales, Tas- 
 mania, South Australia, New Zealand, 
 Victoria, Queensland, and West Aus- 
 tralia were to pay to the Imperial Gov- 
 ernment, interest at five per cent, on 
 the first and prime cost of these vessels, 
 such payment not to exceed £'So,(M}. 
 
 " The Colonies ai'c in addition to be;ir 
 "the actual charges for maintaining 
 " fi'om year to year three fast cruisers 
 " and one torpedo gun boat, which are 
 " to be kept in conunission in time of 
 "peace, and also of tlie three other 
 " vessels which are to remain in re- 
 " serve, provided always that the claim 
 " made by the Imperial (-overrinn'nt 
 " imdei- this head does not exceed the 
 "animal payment of filLlNtO." Al- 
 Ihougli the Pailiameiit of (Queensland 
 refused to ratify this agreement, there 
 is no doubt that its terms will idti- 
 mately be cai-i-ied into effect. The dis- 
 cussions at the conference regarding it 
 are most interest ing. and al)ound with 
 evidence that a most genei-ousand con- 
 siderate spirit actuate<l all the lep- 
 resentatives. Tliefiict that this assess- 
 ment of 4*12(),('"** annually w.is levii'd 
 upon the Australasian Colonies, and 
 agi-eed to by t lieir,(U'legiit es, without 
 any reference to the i-elative wealth, 
 jxipulation, shipping or trade of the 
 contrai'ting parties, is a ju-oof of the 
 readiness of the Australians to 
 do their duty in the matter of 
 naval defence. Mr. Service, of Vic- 
 toria, called attention to the fact 
 that no basis had been laid down upon 
 which the contribution should be made, 
 and his contention, that the ariange- 
 ment proposed by the Imperial (iovei'u- 
 nient was destitute of any funilamental 
 pi'inei{)le, was not seriously contro- 
 verted. The most that can i>i' said for 
 it is that it seems t<j Ite roughly based 
 upon population. The population of 
 the Australasian Colonies amounts to 
 about l';il)eT' cent, of the whole poj)U- 
 lation of the Empii^e, andthesiun they 
 have agreed to conti^ibute is about one 
 per cent, of the total Hi-itish navy 
 estimates, of which the whole Empire 
 has the benefit. It seems unfortimate 
 i hat this contribution sIkhUiI have as- 
 
su'iicd tlic foriii i)\' .1 siilisidy, imd fluit 
 it i^Iioiilil Imvc l)ct'H fixed wifliout 
 rcrcrfncf to tlic rt'ljitivc i)ia;;iii(iid<' of 
 tlu' t fiidi', wciillli (ir pnp-.ilat inn uf the 
 ()1 iici- ( '(ill )i lies (ir t lie Mot lnT ('uimti'v. 
 I»Mf ;if1<'i' .'dl, t lie lU'ijuif^'ciMciit i-ioidy 
 tciiipiirnry. Jiiid in cari yiii)^ it out, cx- 
 pt'i-ifticc will !)(• f^aiiird i-c^ar'dinjLC its 
 iiK'i'its as a plan for ohtaininf? contribu- 
 tions fi'oin ilu' Colonics. 
 
 it is nnicli to the ci-cdit of the Aus- 
 tralians that tlu'y agreed to this cori- 
 tiil)UtIon so rf-adily, l)i'(a;i>c tJicy 
 inij^lil have taken tiie position tliat, 
 according to the jireseiit undi I'standiufj; 
 hetweeti (Jrcat liiitain and lierColon- 
 i(>s. naval defence is exclusively the 
 business of the Imperial ' ioverninent. 
 The st.aten>en( of Sii- Ali'xander Camp- 
 bell is esjiecially explicit upon this 
 point. He>aid: "The !mi)erial («ov- 
 " ei'iunent liail pi'cviously j^iveii u.s 
 " notice of their intention to withdraw 
 " from the Colony Tier Majesty's 
 " troo])s, and they declared their reso- 
 *' hit ion to carry that out. The Gov- 
 " enuuent here (i.e. in London) agi-eed 
 " to undertake the naval defi^iu-e of 
 "Canada, the Canadian authorities 
 " undertaking the liuul defence of the 
 " Colony. ^Cpon that l)asis the con- 
 " federation of all the Provinces was 
 " formed, viz.: — That Her Majesty's 
 ** troojis were to be withdrawn (the 
 " withdi'awal was then in course of 
 " beinjjj carried out), and tliat the local 
 " authorities were only to iuul(>rtake 
 " the land defence." Other delei^at.'s 
 spoke to thi' same effect, and all of 
 them seemed to accept inu'eservedly 
 the principle that land defence 
 should lie undertaken and paid for by 
 the Colonies. A great amount of in- 
 formation as to what each of them had 
 done in this respect was laid before the 
 conference and led to expressions of 
 much gratification from its members. 
 
 I Sir .Mexandei- Caui|)bell spoke foi- Can- 
 ada, and described its inilitarj' etl'oiis 
 and resources. He also claimed that 
 I the construction of the Canadian I'aei- 
 ! fic Hallway was a very solid contribu- 
 tion to Im|»erial defence, " My means o I' 
 "that railway," said he, "and by 
 " means of the Intei-colonial liaihvay. 
 " we have extended the possible coni- 
 "municatiou from Loiulon to tlie ex- 
 "treme Moi't h-West on the Pacilic 
 " Ocean, and reduced the t i me occupit d 
 " in t ra versing t bat distance to a }iei'i(id 
 "of 11 foi'tnigbt. So that now Ilei' 
 "^Majesty's (iovernment could send 
 " I'einforeements of nuui and material 
 "to Kstpiimalt in 12 <»!• 11 days from 
 "this place I London). To consti'uct a 
 " railway that can put such a power 
 " in the hands of Iler Maj(\sty's (iov- 
 " ('rnmeut is uiidoid)ledly a great cen- 
 " tribution to the defeiu-e of the coun- 
 " try. Few things can be luoi-e vahi- 
 " able to the defence of a counti-y than 
 " tlu' powei- of i-eady comnninii'ation." 
 The readiness with which this claim 
 was admitted by the Hnglish represen- 
 tatives wasone of the most remarkable 
 and gratifying features of the confer- 
 ence. INIr. Stanhope, the Secretary of 
 State for War, said, " I confi'ss that I 
 " entirely agi-ee with Sir Alexander 
 " Campbell in saying that it is not 
 " possible to exaggerate the advantage 
 " from a military point of view which 
 " the Em})ire has gained by the con- 
 " struction of the Canadian Pacific 
 " Railway." A similar and wider ac- 
 knowledgement was made by Lord 
 Knutsford in his letter of 2;{rd .Tuly, 
 1887, to the Governors of Colonies 
 transmitting the Colonial Conference 
 report. He writes thus: — "Summary 
 " statements, forming a valuable and 
 " interesting record of the pi-ogress of 
 " all the self-governing Colonies in 
 " matters relating to defence, were laid 
 
2D 
 
 jxikc for ('nil - 
 ilitjiiy ('Hnrls 
 cliiiiiH'd that 
 nimflinii l*iui- 
 (ilid coiilfihu- 
 " \\y iii('!iiis(«r 
 lie, "Jiinl liy 
 iiial Haihvny, 
 possihli' cou\- 
 on In tlio ox- 
 1 tlu' I*acilic 
 time oi-ctipi* il 
 tu«' to a iicriod 
 liat now Tier 
 t (MUlld si'Tul 
 1 and nialcrial 
 U (lays ft'(^ii» 
 Po coiifstruot a 
 such a i)owcr 
 Majesty's (Jov- 
 ly a gri-at (-(Mi- 
 •(' of the (-orin- 
 1x1 iijoro vahi- 
 i country tlian 
 nniunication." 
 ell this claim 
 ^flish i-cprcscii- 
 ist ivniarkable 
 of the confcr- 
 o Seci'ctary of 
 confess that I 
 ■iii- Alexander 
 lliat it is not 
 theadvantafi;e 
 ()f view whieii 
 |d by the con- 
 ufiian Pacilic 
 land wider ae- 
 ade by Lord 
 of 2;-$rd July, 
 of Colonies 
 al Conference 
 — " Summary 
 valuable and 
 |he prof^ress of 
 C«)lonies in 
 ince, were laid 
 
 before the conf<'rence, and will be arm coalinj; stations ntul fort^ nt 
 I'lwdidenlia'ly connnunicated to the .Sjciwa Leone, St. Helena, Simons H;iy 
 Colonial tJoverunicnts; but if is not ' (at t he Cape of (iixtd llo|ie). Trincoina- 
 d«'sirable to include them amoiiK the lee, .lamaica and I'orf C/»strie.s (in the 
 published papers. Tlu-se statements island of Santa I, iieia). At other very 
 are extremely gratifying; to Her important iioints the Home (iovern- 
 Majesty's (iovernment, as showing , ment has supjilied or pn»poses to sup- 
 tlu' »'nergy, altility and .self-sacrifice j jjjy the most modernand veryexpensive 
 
 guns and othei-ai inaments, leaving the 
 cost of the works to be defrayed by the 
 Colony oi- dependency interest4'(l. This 
 is the case with Table Hay, .Mauritiu.s 
 Aden, Colombo, .Singapore, Hong Kong 
 and i)ossibly also with lOsijuinialt. It 
 must not, however, be forgotten (hat a 
 very great deal has l»een acconi|)!ished 
 by several <jf the Colonies, altogether 
 apart from their nulit^iry organizations. 
 The defences, for instance, of Sydney, 
 Newcastle and Melbourne, which ai-e 
 coaling stations as well as harbours, 
 have been built, their armaments sup- 
 plied and theii' forts manned wholly 
 at Colonial expense. 
 
 If all this be well considered it will 
 not awaken surprise that tlu' various 
 Austialian i-epresentatives were dis- 
 inclined to respond to the proposal of 
 the Imperial authorities that their 
 CJovernments should bear the cost of 
 fortifying and defending the coaling 
 stations at King (ieoi'ge's .Sound and 
 Thursday Island, excluding only the 
 cost of an armament which the Austra- 
 lian representatives did not regard as 
 sufficiently modern and effective. They 
 co\dd not see that ineiely l)ecause these 
 stations were situated uj)on Atisf ralian 
 Territory, they should be dilfei-ently 
 cla.ssed from those which were l)eing 
 fort ifled almost at tlu' sole expense of 
 the Impeiial (fovernment. Sir Graham 
 Berry said that "if these are the ma- 
 " tured views of the Imperial Govern- 
 " ment, I feel 'quite satisfied that the 
 " Parliament, certainly of Victoria, 
 ** and I believe of the other Colonies, 
 
 with which the Colonies have con- 
 " ti'ibuted their shai'e towards the 
 " general defeuce of the Kmi)ire. Thus, 
 " «h'aling wWh ix-rson nrl only, it ap- 
 '• pears that in the Donnnion of ( 'anada 
 "the avjiilable force of active militia, 
 "together witli the permanent coi-ps, 
 "amounts to nearly .*{."),(MX) men; 
 "in the Australasian Colonies the 
 " t(/tal armed strengtli is no less than 
 ":U,(XK); and in the Cape and Natal 
 "there are trained foi-ces of r),r)0() and 
 "l.'yK) men respei'tively. There is, 
 " moreover, in each ca.se a larg<> reserve 
 " which can be drawn upon in case of 
 " need." 
 
 But between the naval armaments 
 and the defence of shipping on the 
 high seas by the Imperial Government 
 on the one hanil, and the military 
 establislunents of the Mother Country 
 and the Colonies for land defence on 
 the other, there are to be found de- 
 fensive works of an amphibious char- 
 acter, the nature and cost of which 
 gave rise to very interesting disccus- 
 , sions. These are the first-class coal- 
 '{ ing stations which are being estab- 
 .* lished and fortified "for the puri)ose of 
 ^; •' maintaining comnniniciition with the 
 ^ " distant dependencies of the Empire, 
 ^1 " and protecting the floating trade in 
 I " the event of war." Mr. Staidiope 
 1 gave a description of the extent of 
 *the work of this nature which the 
 I Imperial Government proposed to 
 undertake. Besides the Imperial 
 • fortress of Malta, Gibraltar, Halifax 
 and Bernuida it has to maintain and 
 
■f* 
 
 30 
 
 •' would urarcr-ly iindcrf^ik*' the fx- 
 *' pt'tisc of works outHi(l«> their own 
 " l)oiiii<liirifN, if the Iiii|U'riul (Jovcni- 
 *' iiifnl n'piKliatcd all liahility wliat- 
 ** ever towai'ds the cxpcnHi'.s of ♦In- 
 " foitiflcaf ioiiH of Aiisti-alia. (Ilrar, 
 " iH'ai). I tlioii^lit it tu'ct'-ssary to Hiiy 
 "lluH plainly, because it has cfnui' 
 " upon me liy surprise to learn tliat 
 *' tlu> lni|)erial (Joverninent treats 
 "KiuK (ieorK«'M Sound ditfei'ently 
 "from oilier coaling stjitions of Ini- 
 " pfiial injportanee." Other delegates 
 spoke in a similar way, and, in addi- 
 tion to such considei'at ions, tlie absence 
 of a propel- basis upon which to pro- 
 portion the contributions was aj^ain 
 connnented on. Mr. Service said, " I 
 *' feel in d(>alinf( with this (luestion a« I 
 " did and as 1 expressed myself, in 
 " dealing with the creation of the new 
 "fleet, that there is no principle laid 
 *• down upon which linancial contribu- 
 "tions sh(»uld be made ' He said 
 nnich more to the sarnie e<Vi ct, and Avas 
 followed by Sir John Downer, whose 
 speech contains the following passage: 
 " As to what has just fallen from Mr. 
 " Service, I must say that I sid)stan- 
 " tially agree with him; we synipa- 
 " thise with each other, I have no 
 "doubt; furthei", I have no d()vU)t, the 
 " Imperial Government sympathises 
 " w ith lis in our small way, and we, 
 " understanding their difTiculties thor- 
 " ouglily sympathise with them and 
 " thoroughly imderstand the difYi- 
 " ciilti«!s they have to deal with in 
 " carrying out that which they may 
 " think will be th<; best thing for the 
 " security of the Empire generally. 
 " But after all, as Mr. Service said, the 
 " time will come Avhen this will have 
 " to be settled upon something like a 
 " fair basis. Whatever the difficulty 
 " of the Imperial Parliament, and 
 " whatever the difficulty of the 
 
 " (\>loiual Parliainpnt, there cannot be 
 " that perfectly good, and projier reln- 
 "tionofthe I'nited Kingtlom to the 
 "Colonies, which we all desiie, unless 
 " it is founded upon a substantial basis 
 " which nnist conunend it.self to the 
 " sense of justiie of all." 
 
 In these remarks it i« nf»t possible to 
 discover any trace of a disinclination 
 on the pai't of the Australians to bear 
 their share of the cost of Imperial 
 njival defencj', but they wish to arrive 
 at an und<*rstaii<]ing as to what that 
 share should be, and how the contribu- 
 tions»l«»wards this object from all the 
 counti'ies in the Km|)ire should be ap- 
 portioned. Some were of opinion that 
 these matters ar«' too nuuh looked at 
 from local points of view, to the ex- 
 clusion of the Imperial aspect of the 
 common defence of the lOmpiie. Hints 
 were even thrown out to theelfect that 
 t hi se questions could otdy IxMh'alt with 
 satisfactoi'ily, by a higher |)arlianient 
 than that of any of the divisions of 
 the Km|)ire. On thisi)oint Mr. Service 
 said :- *• We cannot find any fault with 
 " you for fending otF, as it were, ap- 
 " plications for no end of money to 
 " what is called the Imperial Parlin- 
 " ment, because we see and feel from 
 " our own (experience that the thing is 
 "absolutely necessary. But it brings 
 " into relief the fm-t that the Parlia- 
 " ment sitting in Ix)ndon is really 
 " a local Parliament for the Uni- 
 " ted Kingdom, and that it is 
 " ceawing to some extent to have 
 " ha»ve Imperial functions, which is 
 " made manifest by anotlier fact ; thf 
 " fact that growing colonies like these 
 " in Australia are called upon t^) takr 
 " their own share — in fact the heaviest 
 " share in their own local defences, 
 " seems to me to shew that the Iiu- 
 " perial character of the Government 
 " and of the parliament in London is 
 
 J* 
 for 
 
81 
 
 iTP cannot hv 
 I pnnHT n-lii- 
 K<l<ini \o the 
 
 )st)»,ntial hnsis 
 itH«lf to tlU' 
 
 if)t ])ossit)l<' til 
 (lisincUnntiitii 
 •iilians t«> iM'ar 
 
 <»f Impirial 
 wish U> arriv»- 
 
 to what that 
 / thf contiibu- 
 •t from all tht' 
 . sliouhl brap- 
 »f opinion that 
 inch looked at 
 i-w, ti» tlu' »'X- 
 
 nspf'C't of thi' 
 Cnipin'. Hints 
 , the ctYt'ct that 
 ly biMh'aU with 
 licr pailiunu'nt 
 lie divisions of 
 int Mr. Servic*' 
 I any fault with 
 
 as it weie, np- 
 1 of nioui'V to 
 
 npcrial Parlia- 
 and fe(>l froni 
 
 lat the thing is 
 But it brings 
 lliat the Parlia- 
 lidon iH really 
 
 for the Uni- 
 
 that it is 
 
 tent to havi" 
 
 lons, which is 
 
 ither fact ; th*' 
 
 lonies like thesi' 
 1 iipon to take 
 
 ^i-t the heaviest 
 local defences. 
 
 Iv that the Ina- 
 
 lie (Jovernnient 
 in liondon is 
 
 •'to Home extent disappeaiing ; and I ! "whole of this loss could be saved to 
 f " fatii y that lliat is a fad which will " the coiuitry, and an inuneiise burden 
 
 " have to Im' dealt with in tlie near 
 " futui-e. That would, of cours*-, point 
 " to some botly of an Imperial char.i- 
 " act<T which couhl ihal with (juestiouH 
 "of this sort, riot oidy from a defence 
 " point f>f view, t)ul from a Ibiance point 
 *• of view."' These nuotalions will shew 
 that the discussion travelled over 
 ground situateil at (piite a distance' 
 from King (ieorge's Sound and Tiuu-s- 
 I ilay Island. No decision was arrived at 
 
 (regarding the defcmc of these points, 
 and Mr. Staidiope and Lctrd Knut«- 
 ftird were unable to do more than 
 promise full consid(>rat ion of tlu^ views 
 put forwartl by tint t'olonial repre.sentu- 
 
 , tives. 
 
 The subj«'ct, next in importan(;e to 
 the defence of the Kmpirci, which wa-s 
 discussed by t he coi»fer(>ru'e was Postal 
 and Tel«-g|'jiphic Communication, but 
 it cannot be said, witli regard to these 
 that any very positive result.s were 
 reached. The sclu-nu' for an Imperial 
 Penny Postiige did not receive nuicli 
 consideration from the Colonial (h'lega- 
 les who almost all proiiounci-d it im- 
 practicable. One statement after 
 another was made as to the amount of 
 loss sustained in working the present 
 postal airangements of each Colony, 
 and from this it was ai-gued that addi 
 
 .tional outlay would meet with disap- 
 proval. Mr. Ilenuiker Ili'aton's state- 
 ments were phured before the Cont'er- 
 jpnce and he was invited to supplement 
 ihinn by verbal explanations, but aft«'r 
 pe withdrew^ they were not seriously 
 liscussed by the delegates. Mr. Heat- 
 11 (piestioned the contention of the 
 lecretary of the Ti-easiu-y that the 
 )stal rates to the Coloiues coidd not 
 »e reduced because therii was already a 
 IS3 uj)on that service of over iil,(XX) 
 
 jber day. He maintained that " the 
 
 " taken from tht> neck of our connner- 
 " ce, by the simple expedient of stop- 
 " ping till' payment of the hug(> sub- 
 " sidles now rei'«ived by certain st«'ain- 
 " ship companies, or by shifting the 
 "obligation to pay the ttKdt.CMK) now 
 "annually paid for oui Foreign and 
 "Colonial I'ackvt Service from the 
 " Post Onice Department to the 
 "Admiralty, the lattei- department, 
 " moi-eovpi', paying only such sums as 
 " njay fairly be claimed foi-the sei-vice." 
 A vei-y great deal can be said for Mr. 
 Healon'K vi«w. The term "Postal 
 subsidy" even in the (%>loides ih a nns- 
 nomer, aiul such grants are made (juite 
 as nuu'h for encouraging passi-nger 
 trattic and facilitating ti'ade as for 
 carrying Her Majesty's nuiils. Mr. 
 Heaton, however, did not suggest any 
 other account to which the Colonial 
 subsidies could be charged, and it wjuj 
 peihaps on this accoimt that the Col- 
 onial delegates shewed so litth' interest 
 in the inatti'r. They looked at it froui 
 their own local stand point and made 
 no suggestion of an Imperial method 
 of meeting the diflicully. 
 
 The Austi-alian and South African 
 (h'legates very distinctly expressed 
 their unwillingness to join tlu^ " Cni- 
 versal Postal I'nion," and, in doing so, 
 lent considerable sup})ort to Mr. Hea- 
 ton's views regarding that combina- 
 tion. This is what he says about it to 
 the lAist master (leneral under date the 
 22nd, March, lHS7:-"You say that 
 " owing to (Jreat Hrit^un and several 
 " of !u'r Colonies being niend)ers of the 
 * Postal Union they are prevented from 
 " estab'ishing a permy postage system 
 " nmoiig themselves. Yet this is the 
 " union which you have constantly 
 " iH'ged the Australian Colonies to join 1 
 " This Union which ties your hands, 
 
te 
 
 '• which stiindH in the way of reform, 
 " ami wliich imposes upon you all man- 
 *' iier of fetteriiifjf restrictions ! Surely 
 " it would he wiser to advise Australia 
 '* tokeep free from it, and to recoverour 
 " own freedom hy giving fair notii e to 
 " the other powers. In my opinion, the 
 " Postal Union, so far as the Colonies 
 " and India is concerned, has proved a 
 '* delusion and a snai-e. I find that 
 " India, Mauritius, Buenos Ayres, and 
 " twenty other places in the Postal 
 " Union are chai-ged 100 per cent, more 
 " for postage from England than from 
 " France and Germany." 
 
 With reference to the projjosed new 
 steamship services in other parts of the 
 Enjpire, and the new suhsidies propos- 
 ed, Lord Knutsford's summing up is as 
 follows : "The important proposals of 
 " the Canadian Pacific Railway Com- 
 " pany for a service of powei-ful 
 " steamers hetweeu Vancouver and 
 " Hong Kong, by way of Japan, was 
 " not discussed at length in the Confer- 
 " ence, being already under the 
 " consideration of Her Majesty's Gov- 
 '• ernment. Attention was, iiowever, 
 " called by the Canadian representa- 
 " fives to this scheme iis well as to that 
 •* for establishing a line of steamers 
 " from Vancouver to Australia, and it 
 " was stated that the mails could be 
 " carried to Australian and Asiatic 
 " ports in considerably less time and 
 •' at less cost by those Pacific routes 
 " than at present." 
 
 Much information was furnished and 
 many prajects were mooted concerning 
 Inter-british cable comnumication, and 
 some of the members, perhaps feeling 
 themselves free from hami>ering details 
 and responsibilities, indulged in en- 
 thusiastic expressions, almost sugges- 
 tive of Imperial Federation and cer- 
 tainly pointing towards closer union. 
 The following is an extract from the 
 
 speech made hy Sir Alextandc^r Camp- 
 bell in bringing the dis(;ussion to a 
 close. "AVe consider that by taking 
 advantage of the telegraph line from 
 the Atlantic Ocean, at Halifax, to 
 the Pacific Ocean, at Vancouvers 
 Island, which we Canadians have 
 established without any help fi-oni 
 Her Majesty's Government, or any 
 refereiu^e to them, the Govermunts 
 of the varitnis Colonies of th'^ Empire 
 will be lending tlu^ most valuabl6 
 assistance to that which we all have 
 in view, and which ihe members of 
 Her Majesty's Government have 
 repeatedly exi)ressed their desire to 
 see brought about, as it is undoubt- 
 edly the desire alike of Her Majesty's 
 subjects residing here in Great Brit- 
 ain and of Her Mejesty's subjects 
 it'siding all over the world — that is to 
 &..;y, a closer connection of the various 
 component parts of the Empire — we 
 think we have afforded the best 
 means of doing this by opening the 
 line of railway telegraph across the 
 Continent of America. We have 
 placed it in the power of Her 
 Majesty's Government in Great 
 Britain to draw closer those bonds 
 by th(^ most impt)trant of all ties, 
 the ties of speedy communication, 
 the ties of interest, and the ties 
 which spring from opportimities of 
 making communications from one 
 end of Her Majesty's dominions to 
 the other by telegraph lines almost 
 entirely within the control of Her 
 Majesty's subjects. These we think 
 are the most import-fmt means wliich 
 could be resorted to for drawing 
 closer those bonds between the dif- 
 ferent parts of the Empire which we 
 all value so much." 
 Sir Alexander was foUowanl by Mr. 
 Sandford Fleming, who explained anil 
 recommended a comprehensive scheme 
 
 *''Y' 
 
 
 ■M 
 
 [)>• 
 
 
 an 
 
 
 til 
 
 
 COl 
 
 
 wi 
 
 
 nu 
 
 
 thi 
 
 
 un 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 '•f 
 
 "'w8 
 
 ■•1, 
 
 
 -H 
 
 
 "(1 
 
 
 
 
 '•ii 
 
 
 *• i( 
 
 
 •• v 
 
 
 
 
 " n 
 
 
 '> 
 
 
 
 
 •' w 
 
 
 '•t( 
 
 
 " .U 
 
 i ^ 
 
 
 •ti 
 
 
 
 
 " S(j 
 
 ,:> 
 
 
caiider Caiup- 
 cussion to a 
 at by taking 
 apli lino from 
 t Halifax, to 
 
 Vancouvers 
 ladians have 
 ly help from 
 nent, or any 
 i GovernjiHits 
 of th'^ Empire 
 nost valuabl6 
 •h we all have 
 a members of 
 rnment have 
 heir desire to 
 it is imdoubt- 
 Iler Majesty's 
 in Great Brit- 
 'sty'.s subjects 
 )rld— that is to 
 I of the various 
 le Empire— we 
 •ded the best v 
 )y opening the ; 
 iph across the 
 a. We have 
 ;)wer of Her 
 ut in Great 
 T those bonds 
 nt of all ties, 
 )nimunieation, 
 and the ties 
 )portunities of 
 nis from one 
 
 dominions to 
 1 lines almost 
 ontrol of Her 
 
 lese w<3 think 
 t means which 
 for drawing 
 tween the dif- 
 ipire which we 
 
 Uowa'd by Mr. 
 explained and 
 lensive scheme 
 
 33 
 
 l)y which the most of the submarine 
 and main telegraph lines, as well as 
 the new I'acific cable to Australia 
 could be consolidated and brought 
 within the manageiueut of t)ne depart- 
 ment undei- Government eoutrol. Then 
 the following resolutions were pa,sse«l 
 unanimously by tlie conference: — 
 
 1. " That the connection recently 
 '* formed through C'anada from the At- 
 " lantic to the Pacific by railway tele- 
 '• graph opens a new and alternate line 
 "of Imperial conununication over the 
 " high sejiHand through British possess- 
 *• ions which promises to be of great 
 •• value alikti in naval, military, com 
 " mercial and political juspects. 
 
 2. " That the connection of Canada 
 ** with Australasia by direct submarine 
 " telegraph across the Pacific is a pro- 
 " ject of high importance to the Em- 
 '* pire, and every doubt as to its prac- 
 •• ticability should without delay be 
 *' S(^t at rest by a thorough and ex- 
 •* haustive survey." 
 
 Several of the delegates expressed 
 the hope that these resolutions woidd 
 b(* followed up by action, but Lord 
 'Knutsford's conclusion does not go far 
 .towards sustiiining such hopes. He 
 Jtvrites thus to the Goveriu)rs of Col- 
 onies:—-" In connection with the sub- 
 •*' ject of telegraphic conununication, 
 •' the propositi of an alternative ine to 
 "" Australia wiis promintnitly brought 
 >*• forward. The C'olonial representa- 
 s" tives were of opinion that their Gov- 
 /• ernments would not, unless the 
 f Imperial Government also contril)- 
 ,*' uted be willing to subsidize another 
 4' Company in addition to the Eastern 
 !»' Extension Telegraph (Company; and, 
 " in l)ehalf of the Imperial Post OfWce, 
 ?' it was stated that the question of 
 *• such a subsidy could not be entertain- 
 " I'd by that department. While, there- 
 '• fore, I expressed my willingness to 
 
 I " bring before 1: 'r Majesty's Govern- 
 " ment the wislivs of the nu'inbeis of 
 
 j " the conference that a line might be 
 
 ! " construcltHl for militaiy purposes, to 
 " be exclusively conti'olled by the 
 
 I " Government, I could not hold out 
 " any hope that such a scheme would 
 " be favorably received." 
 
 From what has been brought forward 
 of the views of t he delegates it is very 
 plain that no important work, i-ecog- 
 nised jus essential to the proper defence 
 of the Empire, or to the advancenuait 
 of British commercieal interests, can 
 be undertaken, because of the diflicidty 
 of getting the various parts of the 
 Empire to agree as to the extent to 
 which they are respectively interested, 
 and as to the amounts which they 
 should severally contribute. The 
 financial obstacles were the most form- 
 idabh?, and with regaid to sevei-al 
 unich desired undertakings the dele- 
 gates seeuxed to feel the difficulty of 
 obtaining appropriations from their 
 respective Parliaments. Another diHi- 
 culty was the absence of a satisfactoiy 
 basis upon which to levy assessments 
 fi-om the various divisions of the 
 Empire. 
 
 But he proceedings of the con- 
 ference have made these difficulties 
 plain, they also suggest a remedy. 
 They contain a proposal which sooiu'r 
 or later is likely to b»! adopted as a 
 means of establishing an independent 
 source of revenue foi- Imperial piu'- 
 poses, and of obUiining this t)n a fair 
 basis fr<mi the various conununities 
 throughout the Empire. Mr. .Ian 
 Hendrik Hofmeyi', one of tlu' delegates 
 of the Cape of (mjcxI Hope, has the 
 merit of bringing forward this 
 schenu' which in the Colonial Con- 
 ference report is cla.ssed imder the 
 heading of trade <iue.stions. The fol- 
 lowing exti-acts fr«)in Mr. Hofmeyr's 
 
84 
 
 ppeech on the 3rd of May, 1887, will 
 afford a clear idea of the nature of his 
 proposal: — "The fourth of the eight 
 •* subjects proposed to be brought be- 
 " fore the Conference by the Cape 
 " delegates in their letter of 1st April, 
 " reads thus: — ' To discuss the fea'^i- 
 •• bility of promoting closer union 
 " between the various parts of the 
 " British Empire by means of j^n 
 *' Imperial customs tariff, the revenue 
 *' from such tariff to be devoted to the 
 •' general defence of the Empire.' I 
 •' find that this is not quite understood 
 " by some of the delegates, and there- 
 " fore I would like to amplify it in 
 "this way: — 'The feasibility of pro- 
 •' moting a closer union between the 
 " various parts of the British Empire 
 " by means of an Imperial tariff of 
 " customs, to be levied independent of 
 " the duties payable under existing 
 " tariffs on goods entering the Empire 
 ** from abroad, the revenue derived 
 •* from such tariff to be devoted to the 
 " general defence of the Empire.' 
 
 " I have taken this matter in hand 
 " with two objects — To promote the 
 " union of the Empire, and at the 
 •' same time to obtain revenue for pur- 
 " poses of general defence. 
 
 '* Now, this conference has devoted 
 •' a very considerable part of its time to 
 " defence.and we have done something; 
 '• but I take it upon myself to say that, 
 " from an Imperial point of view, the 
 " proceedings of the conference in con- 
 " nection with the subject of defence 
 '• cannot have been perfectly satisfac- 
 •' tory. What have we arrived at? 
 •' Simply this : that the Australian 
 " group of colonies will pay a certain 
 • amount annually towards the support 
 "of a few ships in their own waters. 
 " But what has the rest of the colonial 
 " empire done towards the maintenan- 
 " ce of the imi^erial navy ? Nothing at 
 
 " all. The Cape ha« not agreed to do 
 " anvthing, Canada has not agreed to 
 " do anything, and none of the other 
 " colonies have agreed to do anything, 
 " for reasons which I think are weighty, 
 
 • and which this conference will not 
 " overrule. At the same time it is ad- 
 " raitted by some high naval authori- 
 " ties (although not perhaps by the 
 " authorities whom we have had before 
 " us) that the British fleet is not quite 
 
 * so strong and powerful as it ought to 
 " be, in view of the tremendous inter- 
 " ests that it has to protect when com- 
 " pared with the French and German 
 " fleets, and having regard to the 
 " limited interests that they have to 
 " protect. Supposing that the Imperi- 
 " al Government were to find by-and- 
 " bye that it required very consider- 
 " ably greater assistance from the col- 
 " onies towards the maintenance of the 
 " fleet and of the army than it hay 
 " hithorto obtained, I doubt very 
 " much whether you would find 
 " that a system of subsidies would 
 " answer in the long nm. You 
 " would in that case find very soon 
 " that the principle of representation 
 " would be asserted by the Colonies. 
 " The system of subsidies, if developed 
 " to any extent, would practically 
 " amo\int to a tax, and where ynii 
 " have a tax, the people who bear the 
 " tax sooner or later ask to be repre- 
 " sented. In other words you might 
 " find a system of political federation 
 " brought to the fore, a system which. 
 " however much we may incline in that 
 " direction, would, we must all agree. 
 " present tremendous dilflculties. The 
 " system of subsidies by the colonies tc 
 " the Mother Country has been tried 
 " between France and its colonies. Ir, 
 " the French colonial law there is « 
 
 " clause to the effect that the colonie.'- ; 
 " shall be bound to contribute certaii ■ 
 
 'W<> 
 
 
35 
 
 ot agreed to do 
 1 -not agreed to 
 e of the other 
 « do anything, 
 ik are weighty, 
 rence will not 
 le time it is ad- 
 naval authori- 
 erhaps by the 
 lave had before 
 eet is not quite 
 i\ as it ought to 
 mendous inter- 
 tect when com- 
 zh and German 
 regard to the 
 t they have to 
 hat the Imperi- 
 to find by -and - 
 . very consider- 
 je from the col- 
 ntenance of the 
 ny than it has 
 I doubt very 
 I would find 
 ubsidies would 
 ag run. You 
 find very soon 
 representation 
 the Colonies, 
 es, if developed 
 Lild practically 
 nd where yon 
 who bear the 
 isk to be repre- 
 )rd8 you might 
 ical federati(»n 
 system which, 
 y incline in thnt 
 must all agree, 
 ifflculties. The 
 ' the colonies tc 
 has been tried 
 its colonies. Ir, 
 law there is » 
 lat the colonies' 
 iitribute certain 
 
 
 amounts to the maintenance of the 
 French navy, but according to the 
 latest report that I have seen there is 
 not a single French colony that pays 
 a subsidy to-day ; in fact, the reverse 
 is really the case, and the mother 
 country has to pay for the defence, 
 and in some cases even for the civil 
 government of the colonies. There- 
 fore, taking into consideration the 
 necessity that the Briti.sh Empire 
 should have some other consolidating 
 force in addition to mere sentiment ; 
 that it should have the force of self- 
 interest ; that at the same time some- 
 thing more might have to be done for 
 the defence of the empire than has 
 been done hitherto, and that then 
 the colonies would not be prepared to 
 pay it in the form of subsidies, but 
 might not object to some indirect 
 taxation, which practically admitted 
 their right to greater fiscal privileges 
 within the empire than are accorded 
 to foreign powers. 1 have, following 
 the hints that I have seen in the pub- 
 lic newspapers from time to time, 
 f ornndated this subject for discussion. 
 The scheme which I wish to lay before 
 the conference is one which would 
 promote a closer fiscal union between 
 the various parts of the empire, 
 which would produce a revenue for 
 imperial piu'poses, and which would 
 at the same time leave the various 
 fiscal taiiflfs of the different parts of 
 the Empire, of the colonies as well as 
 of England, untouched. I will give 
 some figures to show how this plan 
 might work in practice. I find that 
 the total imports into the United 
 Kingdom from foreign countries in 
 1885 amounted to £286,0(W,000. That 
 is the last year 1 could get. The total 
 imports into the colonies (I need not 
 give tlio proceess by which I arrived 
 at the figures) for 1885 would amount 
 
 " £66,000,000. The two together would 
 " give £352,000,000, representing the 
 " imports of foreign produce into the 
 " whole of the empire. Now, suppos- 
 *' ing that we were to levy an average 
 " rate of 2 per cent, all round (the tariff 
 *' might be arranged so that one class 
 " of goods should pay more than 
 •* another), that 352 millions sterling 
 " would give a revenue of not less than 
 " £7,000,000. That is a revenue which 
 " would pay for a very considerable 
 " part of the British fleet. It would 
 " relieve the colonies from the pay- 
 " ment of subsidies, and at the same 
 " time that it would be paid by the 
 " colonies it woidd be paid by Great 
 " Britain too, of course. I do not know 
 " whether Great Britian would feel it 
 *' or not, but the colonies would not 
 " feel it, and it would establish a feel- 
 " ing on their part that whilst they 
 " were paying for the defence of the 
 " empire they were at the same time 
 " enjoying in British markets and in- 
 " tercolonial markets certain advant- 
 " ages which foreigners did not enjoy. 
 " That woidd establish a connecting 
 " link between the colonies mutually 
 " as well as between the colonies and 
 " the Empire also, such as isnot at pre- 
 " sent in existence, and which might 
 " further develop by-and-bye into a 
 " most powerful bond of union." 
 
 Although it may be said that the 
 Colonial conference of 1887, this first 
 Council of the Empire, has not been 
 productive of very vigorous action in 
 favour of Imperial unity, it must at the 
 same time be remembered that those 
 who took part in it can be confident' y 
 regarded as the sowers of the seed from 
 which, no doubt, and in good time, an 
 abundant and satisfactory harvest will 
 be reaped. The record of the proceed- 
 ings of the conference constitute a 
 brief, which every believer in, and 
 
.'I'liii-rfrnf 
 
 w 
 
 36 
 
 advocnto of Iinporinl Federation nmst | tage not only preserved and unimimii'cd 
 study and lay to heai't if he would be hut advantageously developed and 
 instrumental in handing down to those strengthened, 
 who come after us oiu* national heri- 
 
 CHArXER V. 
 
 An Imperial Treasury. 
 
 The proceedings of the (colonial Con- 
 ference of 1887 teach us sonu> very im- 
 portant things, and even the discussions 
 which ended apparently without result 
 shew us what it is necessary to provide 
 in order to render the Empire secure 
 and prosperous. They further reveal 
 tx) us the understanding which exists 
 to-day throughout the British Empire 
 ."IS regards its def(>nce. Each colony, 
 or gi'oup of colonies oi- dependency has 
 to meet the expense of protecting itself, 
 so far as the use of military force or 
 militia is concerned, while the United 
 Kingdom not only has its own land de- 
 fence to attend to, hut also the protec- 
 tion of the cojists of the whole P]mpire 
 and of its shipping at sea. Of course 
 this arrangement is imperfect and can 
 only be defended as being of a transi- 
 tory character. That the whole cost 
 of the British navy and of foi-tifying 
 and defending the coaling stations 
 should fall on Great Britain seems utter- 
 ly unreasonable at first sight, and until 
 due consideration is given to the fact 
 that no other part ni the Empire has 
 
 anything to say as regards foreign 
 aifairs, or the conduct of negotiation- 
 which may lead to the outbreak or the 
 avoidance of war. In fact the absenit 
 of any right on the part of British 
 colonies to sha{)e Imi)erial policy, 
 seems to carry with it the absence ';t 
 liability for the expense of the Briti.sli 
 fleet and the Imperial fortresses. When 
 theref(jre the home (Jovernment called 
 upon Australasia to contribute to the 
 defence of shipping and coaling sta- 
 tions, it undertook to disturb existinu 
 arrangements, andought, in all fairness, 
 to have suggested some concession U 
 the colonies of the South Pacific as I't ■ 
 gards the management of Imperial 
 concerns. Moreover, the so-called Im- 
 perial Government, with the view ot 
 establishing a more orderly state of 
 things, shotdd have laid down some in- 
 telligible principle according to whicli 
 the amount to be c(jntrit)utecl by tlu 
 Mother Country and colonies respi'L 
 tively could be regulated, anil it should 
 have offered, in some way or other, t< 
 keep the finances of the Empire distirn.; 
 
37 
 
 nndunimpainil 
 developed iiiul 
 
 regards foreign 
 t of negotiation- 
 } outbreak or tht 
 I fact tlie abseiuf 
 part of British 
 Imperial policy, 
 it the absence 't 
 se of the British 
 ortresses. When 
 )verument called 
 ontribute to tin 
 smd coaling sta- 
 disturb existinji 
 [ht, in all fairness, 
 ne concession U 
 |uth Pacific as n • 
 ■nt of Imperial 
 the so-called Im-, 
 ith the view *)t 
 )rderly state ot 
 d down some in 
 )rding to whicli 
 Intributed by tin 
 colonies respei 
 ;ed, and it should 
 Iway or other, t< 
 e Empire distinct 
 
 JroMi those of the United Kingdom. 
 Tlit'se consid(!rations are worthy of the 
 • ittention of the Imperial Federation 
 I>fi)gue in England, which has adopted 
 as its first aim the establishment of 
 j)rfiodical conferences, and show how 
 necessary it is, in order to their success- 
 lul working, that well matured pro- 
 [KKals should be laid before them not 
 i»nly for establishing a proper basis for 
 he contributions towards naval de- 
 fence, but also looking towards the in- 
 ■ention of a separate Exchequer and 
 m Imperial Senate. 
 To anyone resident in Canada, and 
 wcustomed to the distinction which 
 •xists between Dominion and Provin- 
 ial finances, it becomes a matter for 
 'onder that an Imperial Treasury 
 'parate from that of the United King- 
 lom has not yet been created. The 
 'ant of it must have had the effect 
 Sometimes of preventing the adoption 
 if a vigorous and effective policy in 
 foreign and colonial affairs. But, ih- 
 tt<'ad of bringing into existence a com- 
 jftion fund for Imperial purposes, an 
 l|t tempt has been made to obtain con- 
 ^ibutions towards Imperial Defence 
 #id to disburse these through the 
 tlledium of the English Exchequer, 
 srhaps a more correct view of the 
 msaction is to regard the subsidy 
 ich the Australian colonies have 
 llfreed to pay for the increase of the 
 [uadron simply as a payment to the 
 lited Kingdom for certain services, 
 lis is not a plan which has had much 
 ccess in the past, nor is it one which 
 [likely to have a tendency towards 
 isolidating the Empire. To pay for 
 
 tts is the first step toward.- owning 
 m, and when thevlifferent divisions 
 dig the Empire come to acquire inde- 
 iindent fleets, the unity of the Empire 
 ill not be of long duratitm. And even 
 !a system of contributing by subsidy 
 #~ 
 if 
 
 to a purely Imperial revenue could be 
 inaugurated, it is doubtful, for the 
 reasons given by Mr. Uofmeyr and 
 quoted in the preceding chapter, 
 whether it would be permanently 
 maintained on the part of the Colonies. 
 Happily tfiere is a more excellent way 
 indicated in the proceedings of the Con- 
 ference, and the prt)posal of Mr. 
 Hofnieyr. Although the latter com- 
 mands approval, as far as it goes, it is 
 very evident that the revenue of £700,- 
 000 which it would provide is insuffi- 
 cient to meet all the expenses of au 
 Imperial character. What these ex- 
 penditures are likely to consist of may 
 here be considered. 
 
 In the first place it has to be remark- 
 ed that the several divisions of the 
 Empire already possess and support 
 their own military systems, and their 
 cost does not require to be considered 
 from an Imperial point of view. If, 
 unfortunately, war with any foreign 
 nation should break out, our military 
 resources would have to be combined 
 and utilized in a similar manner to 
 those of the German Empire. But, in 
 times of peace, they would be subject 
 to the local authorities and provided 
 for by them. It is, however, different 
 with the British fleet. There can be 
 only oiu', just as there is only one 
 German fleet, and its cost is a burden 
 which should Imj shared by all the 
 peoples of the Empire. In June, 1S80, 
 a special number of the Imperial Feder- 
 ation Journal was issued entitled, 
 '* Fifty years progres.s," and containing 
 a reduced copy of the Howard Vincent 
 Map of the British Empire. This map 
 possesses features never befoi'e heard 
 of in geography. On it we find not 
 only the possessions of the British 
 people laid down, but also the limits of 
 their marine domains. The vast 
 a'iueous surface of the ^lobe is divided 
 
r 
 
 c 
 
 
 ii 
 
 39 
 
 into naval stations in each of which 
 "Britannia rules the Waves." In 
 noting them it gradually dawns on the 
 mind that the British fleet patrols the 
 high seas like a police force, giving 
 security not only to our own shipping 
 but to that of all other nations as well. 
 We cannot suppose that the latter 
 ha'«^' r.c I., itations conterminous with 
 oms, nor K.ive we heard that their war- 
 ships have been extensively useful in 
 suppressing piracy or the slave trade. 
 The shipping of all nations is a debtor 
 to the omnipssent British Fleet. 
 Equall; i'l.i.c'-od to it are Canadian 
 liners aadi\ nti - 'i'^n coasters, but with 
 unparallelc ' Lot" ai ty the UnitedKing- 
 dora has heretofore .^ive * he whole ex- 
 panse of tl' ' -• <nignil?.» , ."'•otectorate 
 of the ocearia. u '.i^.- > '^^^vnl esti- 
 mates there are other eixpe '.<.vuc=i for 
 common purposes within the Empire 
 which would have to be paid for out of 
 an Imperial Revenue. Among these 
 may be memtioned the defences and 
 garrisons of the Imperial fortresses, 
 harbours and coaling stations ; sub- 
 sidizing steamships for use in time of 
 war; subsidizing the main lines of 
 steam and telegraph communication 
 connecting the various divisions of the 
 Empire; the consular and diplomatic 
 service, the Foreign and Colonial 
 offices, and the cost of an Imperial 
 Senate. And if there is any outlay 
 more triily Imperial than another, 
 surely it is the expense of supporting 
 the Throne and Court of Her Most 
 Gracious Majesty. If all these pay- 
 ments are to be well and properly met, 
 the rate of duty suggested by Mr. 
 Hofmeyr, would have to be increased 
 from two to five per cent. 
 
 The latter is the rate suggested by 
 the present writer in an essay on the 
 Biibject, which was read before the 
 Montreal Branch of the Imperial 
 
 Federation League in Canada, on the 
 2l8t December, 1885, and which Wfis 
 published in " Imperial Federation 
 (Vol. I p. 51.) In that paper lad vocatt'i I 
 the imposition of a duty of five p«'i 
 cent, on all imports from foreign coun- 
 tries into any part of the Empire, the 
 proceeds to be devoted to Naval Defen- 
 ce ; this duty to be over and above and 
 independent of all existing tariifs. 
 home or colonial, and at the sametinif 
 incapable of preventing any of the 
 provinces of the Empire frora modify- 
 ing its ordinary local tariff at pleasure. 
 The following statement shows the 
 value of the imports into the Empire 
 from foreign countries in 1885 and the 
 amounts that would be realised from 
 an Imperal duty upon them of five per 
 cent, ad valorem : — 
 
 Into Great Britain and 
 
 
 The 
 Imperial 
 Revenue. 
 
 Ireland 
 
 £286,566,000 
 
 £U,328,m 
 
 " India, Ceylon the 
 
 
 
 Straits Settlements 
 
 
 
 Labuan and Mauri- 
 
 
 
 tiUH 
 
 24,337,000 
 
 1,216,^'* 
 
 " Canada and New- 
 
 
 
 foundland 
 
 12,736,000 
 
 636.S(K 
 
 " Australasia 
 
 6,751,000 
 
 337.5,5(1 
 
 " The West Indies, 
 
 
 
 Honduras and Bri- 
 
 
 
 tish Guyana 
 
 3,206,000 
 
 160,:wi 
 
 " AfricA 
 
 1,061,000 
 
 63,0.5(1 
 
 " Gibraltar, Malta, 
 
 
 
 Bermuda and the 
 
 
 
 Falkland Islands.. 
 
 154,000 
 
 7,7i«i 
 
 £334,811,000 £16,740.:>,V' 
 
 Tlie Imperial Revenue of £16,740,.V)(i 
 per annum, thus created is no doubt a 
 respectable sum, but not more than is 
 required for the esipenditures above 
 mentioned. If ay attempt is made tc 
 construct an Imperial budget the bcM 
 way is to take these outlays as far a? 
 possible from the recent public accounts 
 of the United Kingdom : 
 
» 
 
 Canada, on the 
 nd which was 
 il Federation ' 
 per I advocated 
 uty of five pti 
 n foreign coun- 
 he Empire, thi- 
 X) Naval Defeii- 
 • and above and 
 xisting tariffs, 
 it the sametinu' 
 ig any of the 
 re froiu modif y- 
 iritf at pleasure, 
 nent shows the 
 into the Empiru 
 i in 1885 and the 
 IB realised from 
 bhem of five per 
 
 The 
 Imperial 
 llevenuf. 
 
 i6,566,000 £14,328,300 I 
 
 !4,337,000 l,216,So(ij 
 
 2,736,000 636.S(«i 
 
 6,751,000 337,.V.'i 
 
 1 3.206,000 160,»«' 
 
 1 1,061,000 5SM' 
 
 154,000 7,Ti«' 
 
 4,811,000 £16,740,.Wi 
 
 le of £16,740,5.)<i 
 M is no donbt ii 
 liot more than i;^ 
 enditures above 
 lempt is made ti 
 ] budget the boM 
 Outlays as far a- 
 ; public accounts 
 
 Kary . including transport £13,000,000 
 
 Dufenco of harbours and coaling 
 
 stations 500.000 
 
 Foreign and Colonial oftlcos 110,000 
 
 Diplomatic and Consular Service . . 900,000 
 
 Imperial Senate 50,000 
 
 Royalty lOO.ooo 
 
 Steamship subsidies 600,(X)0 
 
 t Submarine and I^nd Telegraphs. . 200.000 
 
 £15 460.000 
 It would thus appear to be possible 
 Jto provide for the payment of these 
 [large sums by imposing throughout the 
 Empire the import duty above men- 
 tioned of five per cent, ad valoi-em on 
 [foreign goods. 
 
 To attempt to raise an Imperial 
 Irevenne of sixteen millions sterling 
 [annually by means of direct taxation 
 |in the various divisions of the Empire 
 iTould be an impossible proceeding. 
 Even in the United Kingdom where 
 [the people are well accustomed to the 
 [imposition of direct taxes some diffi- 
 (culty might arise in attenjpting to raise 
 Federal revenue by such means. The 
 English Parliament, or at least the 
 House of Commons might very reason- 
 ibly object to the collection of local 
 [•ates for federal purposes. However 
 this might be, it would certainly be 
 limpossible in Canada to raise $3, 184,000 
 )y any such means. As was said by 
 5ir John Macdonald, "The Dominion 
 practically limited to indirect taxa- 
 tion." Even if the proposal were made 
 pay this sum out of our ordinary 
 Revenue into the Imperial Treasury, it 
 night well happen that the people of 
 /anada would object to contributing 
 that manner. It would be said that 
 7e support our own militia, and have 
 Jade great sacrifices in building the 
 'aniuiian Pacific Railway, a truly Im- 
 ^fjerial undertaking. As for the navy, 
 l^lthough we might be willing to pay 
 J>ur share for the protection of our 
 Shipping, we would decline to imitiate 
 
 England's profuse generosity, and 
 burden oui-selves gratuitously with 
 part of the exjMjnse of preserving the 
 peace and safety of the high seas for 
 other nations. Indeed it ought not to 
 be forgotten that foreign nations profit 
 from our vigilance, contribute nothing 
 towards maintaining the pejice of the 
 high seas, and can only be made to do 
 so indirectly by the adoption of some 
 such plan as Mr. Hofmeyr's. Without 
 doubt his will be found a better system 
 than contributing by subsidy, or rais- 
 ing the money by direct taxation. 
 There are classes in all communities 
 who object to paying over hard cash 
 for the common weal. The British 
 workman contributes two-pence with 
 every glass of gin he drinks, a penny 
 with every half-ounce of tobacco he 
 purchases, but will give nothing direct. 
 In Canada there ai e also certain classes 
 who would object very noisily to direct 
 taxes or contributions for the common 
 purposes of the Empire, and would 
 probably, as in Queensland, call these 
 the Imperial "tribute." It would be 
 bad policy to stir up their opposition, 
 and our recourse must be to indirect 
 taxation, by which every chiss can be 
 made to contribute to the defence of 
 the Empire. 
 
 The objections which might be raised 
 against his scheme have been most 
 ably passed in review by Mr. Ilofmeyr 
 himself, and it is impossible to do bet- 
 ter than transcribe this part of his 
 speech. He says : — 
 
 " Now I know that there are various 
 difficulties which may be started 
 against this project, and I have noted 
 some of them down. 
 
 The first is that it would be said that 
 the proposal amounts to tlie levying of 
 a differential duty, and that differential 
 duties are bad in themselves, and there- 
 fore should not be allowed. But I 
 
40 
 
 I' 
 
 maintain that this injpenal tariff of 
 customs would be no more a ditt'oren- 
 tial duty as between England and its 
 colonies than are the duties under the 
 Australian Act authorizing the Austra- 
 lian colonies to grant special privileges 
 to one another's trade; so that it cannot 
 be condemned on this account, unless 
 we are prepared to demand the repeal 
 of the Australian Act. (Hear, hear.) 
 Then again in the Cape Colony we to 
 some extent have diiferential duties 
 also. We have a ditferential duty in 
 the Cape Colony, not only between our 
 colony and another British colony, but 
 between the Cape Colony and foreign 
 states. We have two republics on our 
 borders, the Transvaal and the Orange 
 Free State ; arid one of our Customs 
 Acts has a provision to this effect : 
 That all South African produce, includ- 
 ing produce either from the Transvaal 
 or from the Orange Free State, with 
 the exception of some articles, such as 
 tobacco, spirits, sugar and colfee, shall 
 be admitted duty free. While, for in- 
 stance, all grain imported into the Cape 
 from Australia has to pay a duty to a 
 very considerable ainount, Fi-ee State 
 and Transvaal grain pays nothing 
 whatever. Morever, I believe that in 
 India a similar practice obtains : that 
 any imports coming overland from 
 the northern border states, outside of 
 India, are admitted duty free, or, at 
 all events, not under the same tariff as 
 those which come into India by sea. 
 
 As a second difficulty it might be ad- 
 vanced that the proposed imperial tariff 
 would be an infraction of the most 
 favored nation clause in the treaties 
 with foreign powers. I do not know 
 whether it would involve any greater 
 infraction of existing treaties than the 
 cases which I have already quoted. If 
 the cases of the Cape Colony and 
 Australia cannot be considered as an 
 
 infraction of these treaties, neither can 
 the present proposal. But if it should 
 after all amount to an infraction of 
 existing treaties, then J slunddsay that 
 it may be as well that for the future 
 England should take care that, when 
 treaties are entered into, the most 
 favoured nation clause is not applied 
 against its colonies to the same extent 
 and in the same way as if these colon- 
 ies were foreign powers instead of being 
 integral parts of the empire itself. I, 
 moreover, find that the system of favor- 
 ing colonial above foreign trade is one 
 which is adopted by almost every other 
 colonial power. France, adopts it, 
 Spain adopts it, Portugal atlopts it. 
 Holland does not adopt the system her- 
 self, but she allows her colonies to levy 
 a differential duty as against foreign 
 goods, but not as against Dutch goods. 
 
 We may be told, thirdly, that it 
 means protection. Well, it may come 
 to mean protection by-and-bye. If the 
 system should be • introduced, it will 
 depend very much upon the representa- 
 tives of the colonies of the empire and 
 of the United Kingdom whether it 
 should be extended so far as to become 
 protective in character or not. For the 
 present, however, I do not aim at pro- 
 tection. I aim at something that shall 
 supply a cohesive force to the empire, 
 and shall at the same time provide 
 revenue for defensive purposes. 
 
 We may be told, fourthly, that it 
 would revolutionize the fiscal system 
 jf England. England nowadays ob- 
 tains a revenue of £20,0(X),000 from cus- 
 toms. But that revenue of 1885 wiis 
 levied upon imports, amounting to only 
 £28,900,000, whilst articles free of duty 
 were imported to the value of not less 
 than »12,000,0()0/. If the plan I have ^ 
 sketched were to work, the bulk of the 
 articles imported into England should 
 be taxed, however low the tax may be, 
 
41 
 
 •s ob- 
 n cus- 
 was 
 o only 
 duty 
 :>t less 
 have ^ 
 )f the 
 hould 
 11 y be, 
 
 oi- t'lsp some colonies might corn plain 
 that they enjoyed no reciprocal advant- 
 iixus luider the scheme. If England 
 wei'e to favour some classes of imports 
 produced hy certain colonies, hut not 
 those produced hy other colonies, the 
 plan pi-ohnbly voidd not work. If, for 
 instance, wheat, which is a Canadian 
 and Australian staple article, did not 
 obtain this advantage, then Canada 
 and Australia would hardly see the 
 use of entering into the proposed ar- 
 rangement. 
 
 As a fifth diflflcidty, it woidd prob- 
 ably be advanced that the food of the 
 poor man in England would be taxed. 
 Now, a tax of two per cent, or there- 
 abouts would not raise the price of the 
 bt-ead of the poor man very much, 
 especially as the poor man would get 
 breadstutfs duty free from all the col- 
 onies— from Canada, Australia and 
 India; and the grain-producing power 
 of those and various other colonies 
 nnght be developed to an almost un- 
 limited extent, so that ultimately 
 hardly any rise in price would be ob- 
 served. I have no doubt that if the 
 laboring population of England were 
 polled upon the subject they would 
 not consider this an insuperable ob- 
 jection, especially if it were explained 
 to them that the scheme might result 
 in the development of a better market 
 for their own manufactures in the col- 
 onies. 
 
 There is another objection (6) which 
 I believe to be of a somewhat more 
 vital character. It is this, that the tax 
 would be one upon the raw materials 
 recpxired for British manufacture. But 
 it would be a tax not on all raw mate- 
 rials, I it only on those not coming from 
 tlie colonies. The colonies might de- 
 velop their producing capacity to such 
 an extent that, after the lapse of some 
 years, the tax would hardly be felt at 
 
 all in England. In this respect also the 
 tax might bt> considet'ed less ol)je('tion- 
 able if the English people fomul that 
 the chances are that they would be in- 
 demnified for any loss they suffered by 
 reason of a tax on raw materials by 
 having a better market in the colonies 
 than they have under the present sys- 
 tem of frtH» competition between foreign 
 goods and their own all over the em- 
 pire. 
 
 Then I have heard it said (7) that an 
 imperial tariff would lay additional bur- 
 dens upon the already over-burdened 
 British tax-payer. I believe that it 
 would not do so, but that, on the con- 
 trary, it would relieve the British tax- 
 payer of some part of his burdens. The 
 British taxpayer at present has to pay 
 for the maintenance of the army and 
 navy singlehanded, alone, by himself. 
 Under my plan he would share that 
 burden with the colonies, and he would 
 know at the same time that whilst he 
 contributed something under the head- 
 ing of a new tax, he at the same time 
 obtained a better market for his indus- 
 try in the colonies. 
 
 Then it is attempted (8) to frighten 
 us with the threat that foreign powers 
 might retaliate. But how would they 
 retaliate ? They would retaliate, I sup- 
 pose, by levying duties on British trade : 
 but they do levy duties upon British 
 trade already — (hear, hear)— they do 
 levy protectionist duties on British 
 trade. ♦ » ♦ Some colonies 
 do levy high duties on British trade ; 
 possibly they even do it for protection- 
 ist purposes ; but whether they do it or 
 not, under my plan British trade would 
 in the colonies have an advantage of a 
 a certain percentage over foreign trade. 
 Supposing, however, that they did 
 proceed to levy even higher duties than 
 at present upon British trade, the 
 result might, of course, be that the 
 
43 
 
 consxiniption of Brif ish floods in foreign 
 countries would d«!crtiiuse. But does 
 not the consumption of British goods 
 In foreign countries decn^juse even at 
 present, while it has been and is in- 
 cresising in the colonies? (Hear, hear.) 
 
 Another objection (0) might be this : 
 Supposing that this plan is adopted, 
 how are you going to work it ? Is it to 
 be a voluntary or a compulsory system ? 
 May each colony cf)me in as it likes, or 
 are you going to apply coercion ? Of 
 course coercion would be out of the 
 question. But supposing that some of 
 the colonies refused to c(mie in and 
 that oth(!r colonies did come in, is Eng- 
 land going to levy a differential tariff 
 as against the recalcitrant ones, that is, 
 against some of its own colonies ? Is it 
 going to give some of the colonies in the 
 United Kingdom the benefit of a differ- 
 ential fiscal tariff, while from other 
 colonies that benefii is to be withheld? 
 This, I believe, is one of the most seri- 
 ous objections that might be raised. 
 But most of the difficulties in the way 
 of great movements are overcome as 
 you go along, and the possibility is that 
 if the plan shoidd wt)rk, and that if the 
 colonies should And that there is really 
 a very great advantage and benefit to 
 be derived under the scheme, even the 
 last one would come in, and there ^ould 
 be none left outside. 
 
 Then if all these difficulties are over- 
 come you would require some body 
 with legislative, and to some extent 
 also administrative powers, a body that 
 would fix upon the amount of the tariff, 
 and a body that might amend the tariff 
 from time to time, either raising it or 
 reducing it, and which at the same time, 
 in consultation with the British Gov- 
 ernment, might have something to say 
 about the administration of the funds. 
 In other words, you would have a sort 
 of limited fiscal parliament by the side 
 
 of the British Parliament and the vari- 
 ous cohmial Parliaments. This would 
 be a difficulty. (10.) It would Ikj diffi- 
 cult, indeetl, to delimit and describe the 
 rights and pcjwers of a fiscal parliament, 
 iw compored with tne rights and powers 
 of the Imperial Parliament and of the 
 various colonial Parliaments. But I 
 wish those delegates who are great ad- 
 vocates of imperial federation toundei'- 
 stand that this, after all, is a mucli 
 smaller difficulty than you would have 
 to grapple with if you entered into a 
 larger measure of imperial imion or 
 political federation. This small body 
 which would have to be created wouhl 
 perhaps Ikj the germ of an imperial 
 federation afterwards ; or, if it failed, 
 imperial fedei*ation itself would have 
 to be thrown overboard for good as 
 utterly hopeless. 
 
 I have briefly gone through the mc )st 
 salient difficulties. I have a great deal 
 more to say, but I do not want to de- 
 tain the conference longer. My excuse 
 for bringing this subject forwai'd must 
 be that, as it is a most important one. 
 and as it has been discussed outside 
 this conference repeatedly, it may bi- 
 as well, now that the delegates from 
 the various colonies are assembled 
 together, that they shoidd give som<e 
 attention to it. The plan, as I have 
 already said, may not perhaps be feas- 
 ible at present; but I think that a great 
 deal will be gained if the atteutitm of 
 the Impeiral Government and Parlia- 
 ment, and of the colonial Governments 
 and Parliaments, be directed to it. If 
 no attention were directed to it, if it 
 were not discussed, we should find that 
 the difficulties standing in the way of 
 an imperial fiscal union, instead of de- 
 creasing in number, would become 
 greater and greater. If there are 
 treaties standing in the way, those 
 treaties, instead of lapsing, in course 
 
A3 
 
 '■ most 
 ,t deal 
 to cle- 
 ^xciise 
 must 
 om*. 
 iitside 
 ;iy be 
 'roju 
 bled 
 som** 
 lavi* 
 feas- 
 great 
 Urn of 
 irlin- 
 nents 
 If 
 if it 
 that 
 ay of 
 f de- 
 come 
 i are 
 those 
 curse 
 
 of time would bo renewed, and other 
 tit'aties would be added to them, in- 
 crojiHing the looseneHs of the emj>ire 
 instead of promoting its solidarity. 
 But if this matter bo discusHed, and if 
 it be continually borne in mind, it 
 stands to reason that in future treaties 
 which may be entered into between the 
 Imperial Government and foreign 
 countries, the fact that the colonies are 
 not foreign countries, but are insepar- 
 able parts of the British Empire, will 
 be remembered, and the most favoured 
 nation clause will not be brought to 
 bear against England's ov/n kith and 
 kin. At this moment the scheme may 
 be Utopian, but even as Utopian I ven- 
 ture to lay it before the conference. I 
 can only regret that it has not been 
 taken up by an abler delegate than my- 
 self, and more especially by a, delegate 
 who is a greater master of the English 
 language than I am." (Cheers.) 
 
 It will be noticed that in this defence 
 of his scheme Mr. Hof mey r denies that it 
 in any way countenances the principle 
 of protection, and it may be well to 
 look at this matter som«^what more 
 closely. T() levy duties on particular 
 imports, in order to encourage particul- 
 ar manufacturers, would plainly be re 
 turning to Protection, a course which 
 the British nation is not likely to adopt; 
 but to impose a uniform rate of duty 
 on all imports without exception for 
 the purpose of raising revenue, and 
 placing the foreign and the native pro- 
 ducer on an equal footing, would be a 
 perfectly consistent and reascmable 
 proceeding. In order to show that such 
 a thing has nothing in common with 
 Protectionism, it may be well to en- 
 umerate and define the different sorts 
 of tariffs which are now in operation 
 among civilized nations, beginning at 
 the protectionist extreme. 
 
 I. Protection with export bounties. 
 
 It may be argued that Pr(»tection, puro 
 and simple, is itself a system of bounty 
 giving. When the nianufactur(>rs of 
 any nation have exclusive control t)f 
 their bonuf market they are able t(» sell, 
 and frequently do sell the excess of 
 their production to foreign nations at 
 cost, or less than cost, or at lower rates 
 than it would command at home. The 
 extra jii-oHt they make «)n the houte 
 consumption Is an Indirect bounty. 
 But when positive payments in money 
 are made upon the export of certain 
 articles, that nuist svuHfly be regarded 
 as the most extreme development 
 Protectionism has yet reached. As the 
 grossest infringement of their princip- 
 les it ought to rouse the Indignation of 
 all conslsUiut free-traders, and Inspire 
 them to just retaliation. Of this poli(!j', 
 Franc(i and (Jermany aff'ord the most 
 flagrant examples, and the United 
 States allow to their sugar reflnei's 
 such a drawback on their exports as 
 amounts to an actual bounty. 
 
 II. Protection, pure and simple. A 
 protective tariff is one imposed prin- 
 cipally for favoring native industrial 
 interests, and is not absolutely requir- 
 ed for r»!venuc. The best example is 
 that of the United States, the openly 
 expressed object of which is to benefit 
 the capital and labour of that country. 
 Ik provides a large amount of revenue, 
 which is paying off" the war debt 
 rapidly. There is no pressing neces- 
 sity for this, and were the Americans 
 anxious to promote commerce with 
 other nations they could easily lower 
 their import duties. But there does 
 not appear any hope of this and al- 
 though the nation does not seem to 
 approve the McKlnley Bill, it appears 
 to have made up its mind to retain its 
 Protective policy. It is quite just to 
 say that this is fen* the purpose and has 
 the effect of enabling the manufact- 
 
 H 
 
Wf 
 
 44 
 
 
 urcr to pay his workinon luKhc^ wapfos. 
 The coiiHUincr in willing to pay inoro 
 for the (i^oodH he usi'h if thereby he nin 
 fiMider work more phMitiful hiiioiik his 
 (H)uiitryinen. He simply prefepH to pay 
 his iMior rattis in this way ; to K'vt< 
 highi'i' rates for lahoitr rather tliaii 
 fosti'r pauperism by distributing 
 unearned money. 
 
 III. Inclihuitial Protection. This 
 system raises revenue by imposing im- 
 port (hities, whieli are so arranged as 
 to favor native industries. It \<ran in- 
 troduced in ('anada by Sir A. T. Gait, 
 and it is possible to maintain that we 
 are still practising the same plan. 
 Canadians do not raise more revenue 
 than their public works, the extension 
 of their railways and the maintenance 
 of their credit require. Raw materials 
 are mostly free, and so are the provi- 
 sions consumed by the labouring 
 classes. Tea and coffee are not duti- 
 able, because no duty, however high, 
 could start or stimulate their cultiva- 
 tion in our northern climate, and be- 
 cause they are very generally con- 
 sumed by our working men. Under 
 our system a " free breakfast table " is 
 more of a reality than in England. 
 On the other hand duties are levied on 
 textile fabrics and articles of luxury 
 because the consumers of such can V)est 
 afford to j)ay them, and because, iti 
 this way their manufacture within the 
 Dominion is stimulated. 
 
 IV. Tariff for Revenue only. This I 
 conceive to be the imposition of a uni- 
 form small rate of duty on all imports 
 without recard to their nature. From 
 this sort of tariff the idea of favoring 
 native industries is excluded, and the 
 duties are imposed simply to raise the 
 money for paying the expenses of the 
 Government. No materials are free, so 
 that no industrial or commercial inter- 
 est is favored beyond another. The 
 
 nearest apjiroach to this ideal revenue 
 tariff is that of Holland, which levies a 
 duty of 5 pi>r cent. tu\ valoi-em (»n all 
 manufactured goods. Helglinn may 
 also be c(>,isld«!red as enjoying a re- 
 venue ta'.'iff, although the rati* of <luty 
 imposed thereon most import>i is nearer 
 10 |H'r cent, ad valorem. 
 
 V. Free Trade. A Free Tiade tarlf 
 is the most difficult to define becnust 
 the phrase is a contradiction. It might 
 be appliiHl in a case where" rev(Miue is 
 raised wholly by dii-cct taxation, and 
 trade entirely free from customs duties. 
 But there is no such cjise, and, if there 
 were, such a nation cotdd not be con- 
 sidered as enjoying Free* Trade. For, 
 as it takes two individuals to make a 
 bargain, so it takes two nations to es- 
 tablish true free trade. If England 
 were, to-morrow, to sweep away the 
 last vestige of her import duties. Free 
 Trade would, nevertheless, be a myth, 
 and would ren;ain such until her good 
 had free access to some foreign market 
 In spite of this. Great Britain is now 
 credited with being a Free Trade coun- 
 try, because she levies import duties 
 only on a few articles of widespread 
 consumption. This nnist stand in the 
 absence of a better, for the best prac- 
 tical instance of a so-called Free Trade 
 tariff. 
 
 VI. Export Tariff. This system must 
 be mentioned iis standing at the oppo- 
 site extreme from that of Protection 
 with export bounties. It is practised 
 in some of the West India Islands, one 
 of whose means of raising revenui is 
 by duties on the productions which 
 they export. Tliat such should be im- 
 posed at the present day is the strong- 
 est proof of the chaotic condition of 
 tariff questions within the bounds of 
 the British Empire. 
 
 Among the various tariff systems 
 here enumerated it would seem that 
 
 
46 
 
 th«< onn ludst closclv' r«'.s»'inl)liiij; Mr. 
 IInfm»'yi''.s,sclu'»ii(' in t liiit dftliu-d wiult'i' 
 No. IV. Tliis Dutch .system woiiltl, l)y 
 many proplc, li(> callt-d an a[)|)r<ia('li to 
 Fr«'«' Trade, liut. In tnitli, it isueitluT 
 Fr«'«f Trade nor I'l-otectionist in prin- 
 fiple. At any rate wlieii im|)oised on 
 r.'kW materials and mamd'actured floods 
 alike, it cannot ho hh'uI to jtartake in 
 the slijfhtest degree of I'rotect ionism, 
 and therefore il on^^ht to he readily 
 adopted hy all shades of liheral opinion 
 in (ireat Britain. 
 
 Tr put a duty on manufactured arti- 
 (;lt>s and allow raw materials and gi'^iii 
 to enter free would really he a spe(!ies 
 of j)i'otection to some industi'ies. In- 
 deed U) exempt any species of foreign 
 
 im|)orts from this duty wouhl lay it 
 open to the chiiige of heing imposed 
 for the piiipose of henelltling particul- 
 ai- intefesiH whereas it is meant to he 
 a duty for revemie purposes oidy. Its 
 im|>osition could not he regarded as a 
 renunciation of free trade ptiwticeon 
 th«> part of the Uinted Kingdom any 
 more than woidd he the continuation 
 of the tea and cotTee <luties. The latter 
 are reipiired along with other taxes, 
 for carrying on the (iovertiment of 
 (treat Mritain. The Imperial ad va- 
 lornm duty on imports is just as essen- 
 tial for meeting the expeiulit ures of 
 the Kmjiire though the medium of an 
 Imperial Tit-asmy. 
 
 CIIArTlJ^ VI. 
 
 A British Commercial Union. 
 
 For several years past an agitation 
 has heen carried on hy certain parties in 
 Canada and the United States in favor 
 of what is called, sometimes, "Com- 
 mercial Union" and at others "Un- 
 restricted Reciprocity." Not only so, 
 hut the Opposition in the Dominion 
 Parliament has definitely adopted this 
 policy. Many persons ai-e inclined to 
 say that this fact accounts for the pre- 
 sent disintegrated condition of tlie 
 Liberal party in Canada, but it AVouId 
 be a mistake to belittle the importance 
 
 I or the possi])le conseciuences of the 
 j movement. One is sorely tempted to as- 
 cribe the present ])rominence of the 
 l)i'oject to the uiu'easoniiig zeal of its 
 j advocates, aiul their sublime indilfer- 
 ' ence to the obstacles which must pre- 
 ■ vent its realization. It is indeed 
 strange to find any man of literaiy or 
 j i)olitical eminence characterisitig Im- 
 ! perial Federation as impracticable and 
 j visionary, ;^nd at the same time foster- 
 i ing an agitation for tariff charges to 
 I which the Mother Country could never 
 
46 
 
 «-^ 
 
 con-ent, and of whicli tho ad vantages 
 to the Dominion disappear oven on tlie 
 most snpei'fifial examination. 
 
 The advocates of this new political 
 prescription, although ext remely exact- 
 ing when considering anything which 
 others have to propose for the consolid- 
 ation of the Eujpire, are very reticent 
 or indefinite concerning the details of 
 their own scheme. But it seems to 
 consist of the following proposals : — 
 To aholish all custom houses on thefvon- 
 tier, and all restrictions on travel «)r 
 trade between the Dominion and the 
 States to the south of us ; tt) increase 
 the duties now levied on imports from 
 Great Britain and elsewhere to .the 
 same rates as now levied on foreign 
 imjiorts under the United State? tarifl; 
 to pay these duties into a common ex- 
 checpier, and divide the product be- 
 twtum the Canadian and United States 
 Governments in proportion to the 
 population of the tw(j countries. It is 
 a difficult matter to treat these proposi- 
 tions seriously. It is impossible to see 
 how Great Britain could consider, far 
 less consent to them. Nor Avould it, I 
 believe, be possible to find a Canadian 
 statesman with sufficient effrontery to 
 lay such proposals before Her Majesty's 
 Representative, and at the same time 
 tiilk of maintaining British connection 
 even of the most attenuated descrip- 
 tion. 
 
 But if we pass over these considera- 
 tions and enquire as to what material 
 advantagesthe i.ew arrangement would j 
 bring to the Dominion, they seem to 
 be very slender indeed. An increased | 
 export of coal would possil)ly be caused I 
 from Nova Scotia to the States of the ; 
 Atlantic sea-board, and of iron ore from I 
 Ontario to Pennsylvania and Ohio. 
 But, on the other hand, the prices of 
 all imported articles would be increas- 
 ed twenty-five per cent., the mai'kets 
 
 of the Dominion would be flooded with 
 American goods, the capital which has 
 recently lieen invested in manufactur- 
 ing woidd be swept away, and the 
 skilled labour of our factories and 
 foundries Wf)uld have to wander south- 
 ward. With regard to our agricultural 
 products, the ch.'inge would not create 
 for them any market which is not 
 already fully su])j)lied. As for the 
 financial part of the plan, if it were 
 worth while to enquire, it would cer- 
 tainly be fo\ind that the shai"o of 
 revenue falling to Canada would be 
 altogether insutflt^ient to i)ay the inter- 
 est on her debt, and provide for the 
 provincial subsidies. But, besides all 
 this, which has been already fidly dis- 
 cussed by Mr. McGoun and others, 
 scores of questions aiise i\s to the 
 working details of the scheme which 
 the Commercial Unionists have not yet 
 deigned to notice, and which it would 
 be unprofitable now to enumerate. A 
 Canadian who not long ago was ques- 
 tioned by a banker in the States as tt) 
 his views on Um-estricted Keciprocity, 
 replied, "The scheme is ridiculous; if 
 ever (^anada should go in that dii-ec- 
 tion, there can be no halfway betwixt 
 oiii" present condition and complete ab- 
 sorption into the United States." The 
 American then I'emarked that that was 
 precisely the statement made by every 
 man of consetjuence in Canada whom 
 he had consulted. Opinions precisely 
 similar are held by many Americans. 
 Mr. Joseph Wharton, of Philadelphia, 
 who had in LS7t), suggested a Zolherein 
 between the United States and Canada, 
 wrote recently in a letter to the editor 
 of the Nation as follows: — "My views 
 are not changed on that subject, except 
 that as the practical dilliculties become 
 more apparent of agreeing upon sche- 
 dules, of harmonising api^'aisei-s owing 
 different allegiance, and of dividing 
 
47 
 
 rlfd with 
 hich has 
 iiifiictui'- 
 and the 
 •ies and 
 •r south- 
 icultiiral 
 :)t create 
 1 is not 
 for the 
 it were 
 ould cer- 
 ihare of 
 vould be 
 he inter- 
 ! tor the 
 (.sides all 
 fully dis- 
 . others, 
 1 to the 
 le which 
 e not yet 
 it would 
 raie. A 
 vas ques- 
 ites aa to 
 ■iprocity, 
 ulous ; if 
 lat direc- 
 r betwixt 
 iplete ab- 
 s." The 
 that was 
 by every 
 la whom 
 precisely 
 nericans. 
 idelphia, 
 oUverein 
 Canada, 
 lu^ editor 
 Sly views 
 t, except 
 s become 
 poll sche- 
 Ts owing 
 dividing 
 
 joint revenue, I have ctniie to jierfer 
 absolute political union with Canadtoa 
 any halfway measure." This quotation 
 goes a long way towards i>roving that 
 "Unrestricted Reciprocity" is utterly 
 impracticable and that any attempt to 
 (;arry it out simply prepares the way 
 for the political (tbliterat ion of (.'anada. 
 Such a scheme only requnvs to be men- 
 tioned to the Canadian people to be re- 
 jected. The truth is that the new 
 movement is only a revival of former 
 agitations for annexation or independ- 
 ence, and is the work of p. vociferous 
 nunority of restless persons who hope 
 for salvation for themselves and their 
 party in reckless political change. 
 
 But the course of these agitators 
 should have its lesson for us. Truly 
 "fools step in whei'e angels fear to 
 tread." Why should we, who are 
 labouring for Imperial Unity, be afraid 
 to disseminate an antidote to their 
 poison ? We too are advocates of Com>- 
 mercial Union, but it is with the Mother 
 Country, her (Jolonies and Dependen- 
 cies. We maintjiin that Great Britain 
 should have the preference in Colonial 
 markets, and Colonists the iii-eference 
 in those of the United Kingdom. Most 
 of us can descry higher objects than 
 this in Imperial Federation, but there 
 are those to whom if oin- movement 
 does not ujean advantage in trade it 
 means nothing. 
 
 It is, indeed, oidv by preferential 
 commei'cial arrangements that the 
 British Empire can be made to present j 
 a coherent exterior. Compare the I 
 front it now shews with that |)ossessed 
 by other nations. When the l)i>imdari- j 
 es of the German Enipii-e or the Ameri- ■ 
 can Republic ax-e reached, merchants 
 are made to feel it in a very tangible j 
 manner, and givin to understand, by | 
 (he tarilf arrangements that true union 
 prevails in these countries. The nations 
 
 of the British Empire are not united 
 by any such bond. Each has been left 
 to its own devices in this matter, and 
 the result is a medley of free trade, 
 revenue and protective laiitfs, at which 
 foreigners smile but of which tlu-y con- 
 trive to take advantage. "To keep 
 foreigners from fooling us" was grand 
 old Admiral Blake's motto in foi-mer 
 times, but it now seems to be forgotten. 
 The foreigner can sail round Australia 
 finding a dilfei-ent tai-ilf in ev»'ry port, 
 but none which indicates to him that 
 he is an alien, or that the country is 
 British. Nor can he fhul that the 
 Bi'itish flag has the preference over his 
 in the East or West Indies, in Canada, 
 South Africa, or even in England itself. 
 When the various countries constitut- 
 ing the British Empire agree to favour 
 each other in their conunercial inter- 
 course, then they will have taken the 
 first steptowardsareal;uidclos(>runi(m, 
 The only bt)nd bevween them whi(!h 
 other nations will be able to feel and 
 understand, in lime of peace, is a tarifT 
 in which some ccjusideration is mani- 
 fested foi- our own fai-ming, manu- 
 facturing and trading fellow subjects. 
 Let us have " Conunercial Union" by 
 all means, but let it be a British Com- 
 mercial Union, suited to the circum- 
 stances of the whole Emjiire. 
 
 British Commercial Union nuans, of 
 comse. union among the menibcis of 
 the British Empa-e by certain arrange 
 nients for nuitual aid and intercourse 
 which do not extend to foreign nations. 
 It necessarily involves unit ual pai-ticipa- 
 tion in certain advantages, from which 
 other count ri«'s are exc'Iudcd. The 
 commonest form of such a t'onunercial 
 Union is that presented by the United 
 States: by the various kingdoms and 
 principalities constituting tlu^ (Jerman 
 Empire; and by the dilferent provin- 
 ces which form the Dominion of 
 
48 
 
 r 
 
 Canada. Such union provides for 
 pei'fect freedom of trade between the 
 states or provinces so boinid together, 
 with more or less restriction of inter- 
 course as regards commerce with other 
 countries. This restriction usually as- 
 sumes the form of duties upon imports, 
 the proceeds of which are, in many 
 (tases, re([uired for purposes of revenue. 
 No othei- plan of commc^rcial federation 
 has had any successful existence in 
 the world's exjierience, and, therefore, 
 when a British Commercial Union is 
 mooted it is at once taken to mean, on 
 the one hand, free trade betwixt the 
 various parts of the Elinpire, and. on 
 the otlier, a tariff of somt; description, 
 discriminating against foreign nations. 
 But perliaps this definition of a (Com- 
 mercial Union may not l)e satisfactory 
 to those political economists who have 
 advocated the greatest possible free- 
 dom of trade, not only between the 
 integral parts of the same federation, 
 but between such aggregated com- 
 munities and other nations throughout 
 the world. Possibly the free-traders' 
 idea of a (Commercial Union is unre- 
 stricted commerce, not only between 
 its members, but with all the world 
 besides. If so, it is one of those un- 
 realisable combinations that have had 
 no existence in the past, and do not 
 seem possible in the future. Let us 
 suppose, for instance, the various ob- 
 stacles in the shape of tariffs that are 
 said to obstruct trade between the 
 British possessions at the present time 
 to be entirely removed or to be all re- 
 modelled after the English fashion, 
 without the institution of any Imperial 
 tariff leviable on foreign importations; 
 would it be possible to look upon the 
 residt of such an ai-rangement as a 
 " Union," in any sense, commercial or 
 otherwise ? Certainly not ; at any 
 rate, it coidd not be regai'ded as an im- 
 
 provement on the Union we at present 
 enjoy. It seems that, no matter how 
 the present British tariffs may be 
 modified or improved such changes 
 woidd not !)ring Bntish possessions 
 into closer union if the question of a 
 common customs tariff, to be imposed 
 by all of them as against foreign coun- 
 tries, be kept out of consideration. 
 
 Since, thei-efore, a British Commer- 
 cial Uniorl involves the imposition of 
 duties on imports, it is necessary to 
 return to the consideration of the ques- 
 tion as to how the simplest form of it, 
 indicated above, would answer for the 
 whole British Empire. A\'hat would 
 be the result, if absolute internal free 
 irade were adopted in conjunction with 
 an Imperial tariff"? What would be 
 the consequence, if the amoimt of 
 revenue at present derived from Cus- 
 toms duties throughout the Empi.e 
 were obtained, not by taxing British 
 products, but by duties on foreign im- 
 portations? It is in solving such prob- 
 lems as these that recourse nuist be 
 had to Sir R. W. Kawson's "Synopsis,"' 
 in which the foimdations for the dis- 
 cussion of such questions has been well 
 and securely laid. According to the 
 
 statistics of this work, it appears that 
 the sum of 37,189,274/. was raised in 
 the year 1885, in the various parts of 
 the Empire, by duties on imports and 
 exports. In the same year the value 
 of the imports from loreigu countries 
 into the Empire was, as has been 
 already mentiou«!d, the following :-- 
 
 Great Britain and Ireland 4;28(),53tJ,(Xlil 
 India, Oylon, Kti-nUs Sci- 
 
 tleinents, Labtian, and 
 
 Mauritius 24,R:^7,(XX) 
 
 Canada and Newfoundland 12,730,(X)0 
 
 Australasia t5,761,()U() 
 
 West Indies, Hondiu-as— 
 
 andBritish Guiana ;3,2(»«1,(KM» 
 
 Africa 1,061,000 
 
 Gibraltar, Mnlta, Bermuda 
 
 and tho Falkland Islands 154.(XKi 
 
 Total 4:;«t,811,(XX) 
 
4d 
 
 ijn im- 
 
 prob- 
 
 ist bt' 
 
 isis," 
 
 dis- 
 
 well 
 
 the 
 
 tbut 
 d in 
 ts of 
 and 
 ahie 
 iitrii'S 
 been 
 
 A simple calculation shows that it 
 would be necessary to impose a duty of 
 111 per cent, on this amount to obtain 
 the revenue above mentioned. All 
 agree that revenue must be raised in 
 the various possessions ; opinions may 
 vary as to the manner of obtaining it. 
 If it were proposed to raise that part 
 of it now derived from customs duties 
 by a duty of 11*1 per cent, ad valorem 
 on foreign imports, it would become 
 necessary to ask, how much would, in 
 this case, be collected in the various 
 
 divisions of the Empire. The following 
 statement gives the answers, and com- 
 pares the amounts with the sums actu- 
 ally raised at present, from customs 
 duties : — 
 
 .5 3 O § G 
 
 Great Britain and Ireland £31,808,826 
 
 India, Ceylon, Straits 
 Settlements, Labuan, 
 and ManritiuH 
 
 Canada and Newfound- 
 land 
 
 AuHtralasiia 
 
 West Indies, Honduras, 
 and British Guiana 
 
 Africa 
 
 GibraltaJ, Malta, Ber- 
 muda, and the Falkland 
 Islands 
 
 So 
 
 ■w O 
 
 p X o S 
 
 ° =?l 
 
 < 
 £19,827,000 
 
 2,701,407 3,427,391 
 
 1,413,696 
 749,361 
 
 .^55.866 
 117,771 
 
 4.130,773 
 7,222,054 
 
 949,115 
 1,475,230 
 
 17,094 
 
 11,(XX) 
 
 157,711 
 
 £37,161,021 £37,189,274 
 A glance at this statement shows 
 that a change from the present system 
 of levying Customs duties, to one f)f 
 internal Free Trade, with an outward 
 Imperial tiiriflf of 11*1 per cent., would 
 occasion an increase in the amount 
 
 raised in Great Britain of 37 per cent., 
 but that, in the case of the (,'olonies 
 and dependencies, the following im- 
 mense losses of revenue from Customs 
 would be sustained : — 
 
 per cent. 
 
 India, &c 21 
 
 Canada, &c , 65 
 
 Australasia 8t) 
 
 West Indies, &c 62 
 
 Africa 02 
 
 Gibraltar, &c 80 
 
 To make up these losses by a resort 
 to direct taxation would be a coiu'se 
 utterly impossible for any Colonial 
 statesman, and, in Canada, it would be 
 one of doubtful legality. The Domin- 
 ion could scarcely levy direct taxes so 
 long as the various Provinces avoided 
 doing so. It might be suggested that 
 the subsidies paid to the various Prov- 
 inces out of the Dominion treasury 
 could be reduced or abolished, but tliis 
 would require a revision of the British 
 North America Act, and endanger our 
 Confederation. On the other hand, it 
 might be claimed that Great Britain 
 should make up the deficiencies out of 
 her increased revenue from Customs, 
 but this course would no doubt be 
 deemed as impracticable as any other. 
 
 From the foregoing it seems plain 
 that inter-British free tiatle would 
 utterly derange the finances of all the 
 Possessions. Indeed, it might be 
 argtied that demanding it would be 
 an interference " with the existing 
 rights of local parliaments, as regards 
 local aflPairs," and confequently a viola- 
 tion of federation principles. Such 
 interference would certainly not pro- 
 mote the progress of the League in the 
 Colonies. It follows that the manage- 
 ment of the various British tarilfs, 
 however chaotic and void of principle 
 they may appear, must be left to the 
 authorities at present in charge of 
 thenj, and any suggestir)ns for modify- 
 ing them nuist be made with the 
 greatest care, and with due considera- 
 tion for the financial necessities of each 
 separate possession. In the proceed- 
 ings of the Colonial Conference this 
 has been fully recognized, aiul in the 
 suggestions there made, it has been 
 taken for granted that the duties leviinl 
 for the piu'poses of e^ich part of the 
 Empire should not be interfered with. 
 As regards an Imperial Tariff, Mr. 
 
 .1 
 
60 
 
 Service (from Victoria) expressed him- 
 self as follows :— 
 
 " I must say that whilst the question 
 of a common tariff throughout the 
 whole Empire has been mooted again 
 and again, it has always seemed to me 
 impossible, probably because I did not 
 think it out. I knew it was impossible 
 for the Australian (.'olonies, for ex- 
 ample, or for Canada to accept the 
 l)rinciple of commercial intercourse 
 which exists in England. But I must 
 confess that a remark which fell from 
 Sir Samuel GrifYiths awakened a new 
 set of ideas in my mind ; and that was, 
 that it was not necessary that all the 
 component parts of the Empire should 
 have the sania tariff in order to carry 
 out this idea— that is to say, ' that if 
 you placed a differential duty as be- 
 tween the Imperial products and the 
 foreign pi'oducts, it would not matter 
 what the precise local tariff happened 
 to be,' I never looked at the matter in 
 that light before, but I have thought 
 about it a good deal since, and I must 
 say it appears to me at present that 
 there is a good deal in that point," Sir 
 Samuel Griffiths, from Queensland, in 
 his letter of the 28th March last to the 
 Secretary of State for the Colonies, 
 wrote on the same f«ubject as follows : 
 *' I hope that an oppoi'tunity may arise 
 diu'ing the Conference of discussing 
 the practicability of consolidating and 
 maintaining the Unity of the Empire 
 by adding to the existing bonds a i 
 definite recognition of the principle j 
 that Her Majesty's subjects, as such, 
 have a community of material interest 
 aa distinguished from the rest of the 
 world ; and of considering how far effect 
 may be given to this principle by the 
 several countries foruiing part of Her 
 IViajesty's dominions affording to each 
 other commercial concessions and ad- 
 vantages greater than those which are 
 
 grantied to subjects of other States. 
 Without for a moment suggesting any 
 interference with the freedom of each 
 Legislature to deal with the tariff of 
 the coimtry under its jurisdiction, I 
 conceive that such freedom is not in- 
 compatible with a general recognition 
 of the principle, that when any article 
 is subjected to a duty on importation a 
 higher duty should be imposed on 
 goods coming from foreign countries 
 than on th{)se imported from Her 
 Majesty's dominions." The same 
 policy was endorsed by the general 
 committee of the Imperial Federation 
 League in Canada at a meeting held at 
 Ottawa on June 20th 1887, and largely 
 attended by members <»f Parliament. 
 It was then resolved :—" That this 
 meeting suggests for consideration Im- 
 perial Reciprocity as the trade policy 
 most in accordance with the objects of 
 the League, and reiterates the opinion 
 that trade between different parts of 
 the Empire should take place upon 
 more favorable terms than trade with 
 foreign nations." This resolution was 
 reiterated at the annual general 
 meeting of the League in Canada, held 
 in Toronto on the 24th March, 1888. 
 'That the Imperial Federation League 
 in Canada make it one of the objects 
 of their organization to advocate a 
 trade policy between Great Britain and 
 her Colonies, by means of which a dis- 
 orimination in the exchange of natural 
 and manufactured products will be 
 made in favor Oi one another, and 
 against foreign nations ; and that our 
 friends in Parliament are ereby called 
 upon to move in support of the policy 
 of this resolution at the earliest possible 
 moment," 
 
 This principle has also been formu- 
 lated by tlit^ Privy Coimcil of Canada, 
 which long ago declared "that trade 
 should be as free as practicable between 
 
51 
 
 the various portions of the Empire, 
 having regard s(jlely to their own in- 
 terests, and undeterred by any ol)liga- 
 tion to treat others with equal favor." 
 When the resolution of the League 
 in Canada was adopted in March, 1888, 
 most of its members were then prob- 
 ably unaware that neither the English 
 nor the Canadian Parliament was at 
 liberty to put such a policy into 
 practice. They did not know that 
 ti-eaties between England and certain 
 foreign countries were in existence, 
 which expressly precluded i^referential 
 fiscal treatment of British goods by 
 the Colonies and dependencies of the 
 British Ci-own. A return presented to 
 the House of Lords in June, 1888, con- 
 tains precise information on the subject 
 and has no doubt awakened in many 
 minds astonishmtuit and anger. The 
 treaties with Belgium and the German 
 ZoUverein stipulate that the produce 
 of these countries shall not be suhject 
 to any higher or other duties than the 
 produce of the United Kingdom, and, 
 while those treaties are in force this 
 express provision is extended to all 
 countries where commercial treaties 
 with Grejit Britain ccjutain a most- 
 favoured-nation clause, and apply to 
 British Colonies. It is useless to point 
 out by what inf.atuation the Imjierial 
 Government was induced to consent to 
 such stipidations. It is enough to 
 know that the treaties may be put an 
 end to after twelve months' notice, and 
 that there is some prospect of their 
 being abrogated. Mr. HowardVincent, 
 who has brought up the matter in the 
 House of Conunons several times, was 
 able, on the 16th June, 1890, to obtain 
 the assurance from the Government 
 that ** no doubt this important matter 
 will be considered when new com- 
 mercial treaties are about to be con- 
 cluded with foreign states." 
 
 So far as the present writer is con- 
 cerned he would, as an incidental 
 protectionist, rejoice if satisfactory 
 nuxliflcations of the existing tariffs 
 throughout the Empire could be ar- 
 ranged. But it would appear to be too 
 much to expect this, for the following 
 reasons : 1 — The interests concerned are 
 too varied, involved and conflicting to 
 admit of satisfactory compromise in 
 the framing of such "ri^ciprocal tariffs. 
 2 — Such attempts would be regarded 
 by very many as preliminary to the 
 establishment of a system of artificial 
 encouragement to particular manufac- 
 tures ; in short, as a return to protec- 
 tion. 3 — Even if successful, this system 
 of Imperial reciprocity, as it has been 
 ealled, would only influence local in- 
 dustries and benefit English or Coh)nial 
 finances, but would not provide any 
 revenue for Imperial purposes, without 
 which a strong, united Empire is im- 
 possible. 4— Such a proposal, whether 
 made by the Mother Country or a 
 colony, might reasonably be character- 
 ized as more or less selfish in its nature, 
 and intended chiefly for the material 
 benefit of its originator. These objec- 
 tions do not apply to the Hofmeyr 
 scheme, whioh is simple and unselfish, 
 entirely free from protectionist bias, 
 and capable of producing an Imperial 
 revenue. 
 
 In truth the plan brought forward by 
 Mr. Hofmeyr only gives more precise 
 expression to an idea which has already 
 gained favor in South Africa, Australia 
 and Canada, and although its primary 
 object is to obtain a revenue for Im- 
 perial purposes, it would have the 
 effect also of favouring Inter-British 
 trade. It woidd, in fact, establish an 
 Imperial conunercial union. The tariff 
 arrangements of the L^nited Kingdom, 
 of the self-governing colonies, of India 
 and of all the British dependencies, 
 
r 
 
 & 
 
 would remain, as at present, subject to 
 the various authorities who now con- 
 trol them, save and except that an ad- 
 ditional duty would be levied upon all 
 foreign goods, but not upon British 
 "productions. Not only is it the only 
 system which could be adopted through- 
 out the British Empire without inter- 
 fering with any of the tarifif systems 
 established by either Mother Country 
 or colonies, but it is the only practic- 
 able system which would lend uni- 
 formity to the British possessions in 
 the eyes of foreign traders. On enter- 
 ing a British port they would fli-st have 
 to pay the Imperial duty on all their 
 goods, and then such other duty as the 
 local tariff called for. No other sug- 
 gestion provides so readily a common 
 fund for the purposes of the Empire. 
 If its various colonies agree to contri- 
 bute towards its defence it is surely 
 most reasonable to insist upon their 
 being put on a better footing than 
 foreign nations in their intercourse 
 with each other and with the Mother 
 Country. This is a point which 
 might be conceded very gracefully by 
 England, if not for her own advantage, 
 then out of consideration for the wel- 
 fare of the Empire. The only plan by 
 which England can hope to obtain 
 Canada's consent to contribute sub- 
 stantially towards Imperial Defence, is 
 by giving her, as well as the rest of 
 the Empire, a preference in English 
 markets. 
 
 Such a policy could be carried out by 
 all the members of the Empire, without 
 the slightest inconvenience, because it 
 produces everything which civilization 
 requires. Gortschakoff is reported to 
 have said that "Russia and America 
 are the only nations whose grand in- 
 ternal life is sufficient for them." What 
 these countries would do without 
 English markets is not very evident. 
 
 but if thej' are capable of standing 
 apart in lofty isolation and indepen- 
 dence, the same position could safely 
 be assumed by the British Empire if 
 her statesmen were guided by no 
 higher considerations than are dictated 
 by a policy of national selfishness. In 
 one of the publications of the Impei'ial 
 Federation League there occurs this 
 passage : " The mrtual trade between 
 the possessions of the British people 
 embraces every single article required 
 for food, clothing, education, com- 
 merce, manufacture or agriculture, and 
 for all the pursuits, avocations and 
 pleasui'es of every class of the people ; 
 and is capable of such limitless expan- 
 sion, by reason of the diversities of 
 climates and geological conditions, an 
 to make the British Empire— with a 
 due commercial understanding between 
 its local governments — absolutely inde- 
 pendent of the productions of every 
 other country in the world." 
 
 One great advantage of this proposal 
 for the establishment of British Com- 
 meTci.al union is, that it could be put in 
 practice without waiting for the feder- 
 ation of the Australian or any other 
 group of colonies, and entirely inde- 
 pendent of the discussion or adoption 
 of any scheme for consolidating the 
 Empire politically. A simple applica- 
 tion of the British Government to the 
 Colonial authorities, or vice versa, and 
 a second Colonial Conference to talk 
 over the details, might readily lead to 
 the desired result of simultaneously 
 establishing British Commercial Union 
 and providing an Imperial revenue. 
 No doubt the colonies would have to be 
 consulted as regards the disbursements 
 for Imperial purposes, but this might 
 take place through their agents general 
 until, in course of time, an Imperial 
 Senate and Ministry could be developed 
 and organized to deliberate and act in 
 
53 
 
 such matters. It has lu'conio quite 
 customary of late for fcdcration- 
 ist'^arul men of liigli standing in 
 En;jCl'iiHl to declare that any step 
 in this direction must first be 
 taken by the colonies. But it is diffi- 
 cult to imagine that I''ngland would 
 thus consent to give up the hegemony [ 
 of the British Empire, and wait until 
 urged to action by her colonies. It is, j 
 besides, verj' doubtful whether in all 
 such cases the coloniil tail would be 
 able to wag the English dog. There 
 seems, however, to be no good reason 
 why the colonies should not exert 
 themselves to advance the cause of 
 closer union at the same time as the 
 Mother Country. In the case of Can- 
 ada the same means might be taken 
 for inducing closer commercial union 
 with Great Britain, which have been 
 adopted in the case of the United States 
 Franceand Spain. At thismoment there ■ 
 exist on our statute book standing ', 
 offers to these coimtries to modify our 
 import duties in r(>turn for like action 
 on their part. Similar offers to Great ' 
 Britain and other parts of the Empire 
 would be much more in order, and are 
 just at present more loudly called for. I 
 It .vould seem reasonable and d\itifid 
 if our Domiuion Parliament woukl en- ' 
 act an additional sectiim to the " Act i 
 respecting the Duties of Custon^s," i 
 somewhat in the following terms : 
 "Five per cent, ad valorem may 
 be le\ ied upon all goods imported 
 into Canada from foreign coiuitries, if j 
 such are free of duty, and five per cent. 
 ad valorem, in addition to the duties 
 imposed by this Act, may be levied 
 upon all dutiable foreign goods, upmi 
 proclamation by the Governor-in-Coun- : 
 oil, which may be issued whenever it , 
 appears to his satisfaction, that the ' 
 
 Government of the United Kingdom 
 or of any of its colonies or dependen- 
 cies has imposed or agreed to impose 
 on all its importjitions from foreign 
 countries, whether previously free or 
 dutiable, an additional duty of five per 
 cent, ad vnlorctu, over and al)ove the 
 duties imposed upon importations from 
 British possessions — the proceeds of 
 such duties to form a fund foi- the 
 naval defence of the Empire." 
 
 It is just possible that England 
 would not stand immoved if such 
 action were takei\ by Canada. It is 
 scarcely to be imagined that that old 
 Mother Land, which, since the time 
 she first gave birth to new communi- 
 ties in other quarters of the world, has 
 shewn so well how she co\dd spend and 
 be spent in nursing them up to matur- 
 ity, would remain deaf to the ajjpeal of 
 the eldest of her children. Tiieie is 
 good reason for believing that there 
 exists in Great Britain at present a 
 sensitiveness to colonial wishes. Both 
 political parties are ready to do .any- 
 thing in reason that the colonies want, 
 if those wants are expressed with suffi- 
 cient energy. If we want conunercial 
 imion with England and the rest of 
 the Empire, the (juiekest way to get it 
 may be, not to try by solitary effort to 
 educate the British iiublic up to it, but 
 to propose it. The voice of a single 
 speaker or writer is heard but very 
 faintly in the crowded arena at liome, 
 but the voice of Canada, speaking l)y 
 her Parliament, the sound of her 
 knocking at the gate might start an 
 echo from Coi-nwall to Caithness, 
 startle the British Islands from Unnv 
 present condition of inditferenct! to the 
 agricultural and industrial interests of 
 tlie Empire, and be listened to as never 
 before. ^ 
 
 f 
 
 .!l. 
 
m 
 
 64 
 
 CHAPTEll VI. 
 
 Fair Protection vs. Foul Trade. 
 
 Tn discussing tlie Ilofmoyr schcmp, 
 and the dcfcuice of British coninu'icial 
 interests wliich it would indirectly oc- 
 casion, it h(!coiues necessury to con- 
 sider liow the proposr.l, which has been 
 explained in the preceding duipters, 
 would aifect the ditl'erent parts of the 
 Empire. 
 
 If the Ilofineyer principle were 
 adopted for raising an Imperial r(;venut% 
 by far the greater part of the cost of 
 the naval defence of the Empire, and 
 of the institutions common to all its 
 peoples, would still have to be provided 
 by Great Britain and Ireland, for their 
 foreign imports amount to abo\it ninety 
 per cent of those of the whole Empire. 
 But instead of their share being raised 
 from the income and otluu- direct taxes, 
 it would be levied on goods from for- 
 eign countries. At present, as is well 
 known, customs duties are levied 
 principally on tobacco, snulf, wines 
 spirits, tea, coffee, chicory, cocoa, 
 currants, figs and raisins. On 
 what principle other articles escape 
 duty has never been very intelligibly 
 explained. Why raw materials should 
 be duty free one may comprehend, but 
 the argument in favor of this does not 
 apply to foreign manufactiu-ed goods. 
 It has been ascertained tliat foreign 
 silk, cotton, chemical and glass manu- 
 factures ; w(Jolens, carpets and rugs ; 
 clocks, watches, gloves, hats and bon- 
 nets ; copper, iron, steel, lead and zinc 
 manufactures ; machinery, leather. 
 
 paper, sugar, oils, oilcakes, etc., etc., to 
 the value of eighty millions of pounds 
 sterling are annually imported into the 
 United Kingdom. A duty of five pvv 
 cent, on this would produce four mil- 
 lions annually, an amount almost as 
 much as is raised from the duty on tea. 
 It is hard to adduce reasons in favor of 
 taxing tea which would not apply 
 ecpially well to silks, watches, paper, 
 sugar and musical instruments. It can 
 certainly be shewn that England would 
 suffer no disadvantage from having 
 customs duties levied on these, in place 
 of having a corresponding amoxiut of 
 revenue raised by duties on imports 
 from British Colonies or by direct taxa- 
 tion. The proposed duty of five per 
 cent, might be stiguiatised as an at- 
 tempt t(j raise the j)rices of grain for 
 the benefit of the English farmer. 
 That it would have this effect is very 
 doubtful. The food supplying capabili- 
 ties of Canada, India and Australia are 
 so enormous that the only effect of the 
 duty would be to give to the foodstuffs 
 of British Possessions a pi-ef erence over 
 those of Russia and the United States, 
 without raising their prices. But even 
 assuming that the prices of wheat and 
 flour woidd be increased by half tlie 
 amount of the duty, tliat only means 
 the addition of lO^d to the 
 price of a quarter of wheat at 35s., 
 whicli could not materially affect the 
 price of bread. It might, perhaps, in 
 some quarters be characterised as fool- 
 
R5 
 
 f the 
 tuffs 
 over 
 
 tates, 
 even 
 
 it and 
 f the 
 
 iieans 
 the 
 35s., 
 t the 
 
 ps, in 
 fool- 
 
 ish to tax th<> raw nintciiiils of Eng- 
 luinl's niauiirartures snch as raw 
 cotton, iron ori"-', tallow, oils and 
 ii'on pyrites. But c.itton would come 
 untaxed fi-oni India and lOgypt ; oils 
 and tallow from many of our 
 Colonies ami possessions and as 
 for iron |)yiites, which used to 
 he th'j found;'.! ion of all chemical 
 manufactures, it is no lonjjer of im- 
 portance. Half oi" our soda is now 
 made hy means of nnjmoiu.i, and the 
 other half will p(M)Ti he produced from 
 recovered sulphur. 
 
 Raw cotton ami iron ore have heeii 
 instanced more espeii.'illy as raw ma- 
 terials whose prices woidd be increased 
 hy this duty to such an extent as ma- 
 terially to affect, in foreign markets, 
 the price of goods manufactured from 
 them. It is assni'^ied that the whole of 
 the duty on American aiid Egyptian 
 cotton would i)e j)aid hy the importing 
 country. This is .scarcely warranted, 
 in the face of the statement made hy 
 .J. Stuart Mill (in his I'rinciples of 
 Political Economy, page 405) :— " It 
 " may be laid down as a jn'inciple that 
 " a tax on imported commodities al- 
 " most always falls in part on the 
 " fcu-eign consumers of the conunodi- 
 " ties exchanged for them, and that 
 " this is a mode in which a nation may 
 " appropriate to itself, at the expense 
 *' of foreigners, a larger share than 
 " would otherwise belong to it of the 
 " increase in the generiil productive- 
 " ness of the laboiu' and capital of the 
 " world whicli results from the inter- 
 " change of commodities among 
 " nations." But even granting that 
 the importing country pays the whole 
 of the five per cent, duty, the cost of 
 foreign raw cotton would he increased 
 fi'om say 6d. to G!\<\. per lb. Indian 
 and Colonial cotton would of course 
 remain unaffected. Suppose that the 
 
 last namediiualitiescr)uld hensed forthe 
 mamU'aclurc of cotton cloth to the ex- 
 tentof 5() per cent., and tliat fonryards 
 of tlie cloth (;('uld he pnulnred fio)ii 1 
 lb. cotton, it follows that the prict> jier 
 yard would be increased l)y 0'0;>;^il. or, 
 roughly, J of a farthing, an amount 
 too iiitinitesimal to have any cfTcct on 
 its sale in Foreign countries. Similarly 
 with iron ; it is only a small prf>p()rii(>n 
 of foreign ore that is used in Ihitish 
 blast furnaces, and the value of the 
 ii-on or steel produc("d lies mainly in 
 the labour and t'u<>l con^unl('d in its 
 pi'oduction, so thai the increase in cost 
 would be very ti-itling. 
 
 Even if it Is grantee], for the sake 
 of argument, that the cost of the 
 products of some Briiish factories 
 would, as in the case of cotton 
 cloths above mentioned, be in- 
 creased one per cent, it is to he 
 remembered that this loss would V)e 
 more than bahmced by gains in other 
 directions. A 5 per cent, duty on 
 foreign imports into (Jreat Britain 
 wovdd yield over fom-teen million 
 poimds, and direct taxation could be 
 fVcreased to that extent. It would 
 easily he possible for the English (Jov- 
 ernment to relieve in the first place, 
 and to an adequate degree, those in- 
 dustries that were found to have suf- 
 ferred from the [mpei-ial revenue durj-. 
 It has been calcxdated that the burden 
 of direct taxation resting upon I'nglish 
 factories amounts to twelve and a half 
 per cent, on the value of their pi'o<luct.s, 
 so that, if they were relieved to the ex- 
 tent of five per cent., they woidd still 
 be sufficiently taxed to satisfy the more 
 moderate nienibers of the Cobden (^lub. 
 There are other means which might be 
 employed to compensate the manufac- 
 turers of the United Kingdom in the 
 event of their really suffering, but it is 
 unnecessary to mention them. The 
 
 i 
 
 « 
 
 ■•jl 
 
 . i 
 
 w 
 
 . ? 
 
 '■'•I 
 
66 
 
 sixbstitufion of a tinifinni import duly 
 in place of fhu usual direct exactions 
 could only produce tlie most beneficial 
 results. Of course, as Mr. Ilofineyr 
 HUgKei^ts, the Imperial taii!!f "iniKbt be 
 " nrrarif^ed so that one dans of floods 
 " should pay more tlian another," and 
 there is iiothiiif^ to prevent excej)lions 
 beinfjf made in favour of certain raw 
 materials and allowinfj^ them to come 
 in from foreign sources duty fn'e ; but 
 these exceptit^ns ought to be made with 
 the greatest care, and not initil actual 
 experience had demonstrated their 
 necessity. 
 
 Over against tlie disadvantages of 
 this five per cent, duty to tlie United 
 Kingdom, if there i-eally shoidd be any 
 sudi, nnist be placed th(> preference 
 which her products would obtain in 
 her Colonies, India and other British 
 possessions. This is no slight consider- 
 ation in view of tlie inci-ease in tlie 
 duties levied by foreign countries on 
 English manufactures. This, and the 
 consequent loss of hei- foreign markets 
 is one of tlie causes of those frequent 
 trade depi'essions from which England 
 suffers. Such a i)reference would also 
 be of importance in view of the compe- 
 tition which English goods have to face 
 even in British markets, from the 
 bounty-fed and tariff-protected fac- 
 tories of foreign states. England does 
 not grumble, far less threaten, when 
 prohibitory duties close port after port 
 against her, and the few ports still 
 remaining open to her are mostly in 
 her own possessions. But even in these 
 the foreigner is most unjustly placed 
 on an even footing witli her. This in- 
 justice would be removed to a slight 
 extent by levying the five per cent, 
 duty on non-British goods, and foreign 
 nations would have to pay a Uttle for 
 access to British markets, although far 
 less than they charge for admission to 
 
 their own. This slight disciiniination 
 woidd turn the scale in favour of 
 English trade and an improvement 
 in it woidd at once he apparcMit, 
 The demand foi- British goods and 
 mainifactnres wouhl at once be in<'i-eas- 
 ed in Iiulian and Colonial markets, 
 because goods from France, flcrmany 
 and the United States would have to 
 pay more duty than those from the 
 Mother Country. The prospect which 
 such a policy opens up ex|>!m(ls and 
 brightens (m closer inspect ion, and 
 fully justifies its adoption. It is a safe 
 policy, one wlilch could not possibly 
 produce any bad conse(iueiices, and 
 Avould cause trade dejtressions to 
 disappear and woi-klessncss to 
 cease from among the com- 
 munities of the British Isles, while 
 uniting tliein, by tli*? strongest ties, 
 with their brother nations across the 
 oceans. 
 
 AVe have seen that under the five per 
 cent, scheme, nine-tenths of the Im- 
 perial reven\u? would be raised in Great 
 Britain and Ireland. Of th(( remaining 
 tenth aliout one-third wo\dd have to be 
 contributed by the Domlnicm of Canada. 
 Five per cent, upon her foreign imports 
 would amount to about i;6(H),(XH) or ,$3,- 
 000,000 annually, but the necessity of 
 supporting steamsliip and cable lines 
 would at the same time disappear. 
 When we consider that our neighbours 
 to the south have to pay mucli higlier 
 duties, we cannot suppose that five per 
 cent, additional on goods from the 
 United States and the continent of 
 Europe would be productive of much 
 inconvenience to us. Possibly, on some 
 articles, the ordinary rate of duty of 
 the Dominion tariff would have to be 
 modified. Importations from I'^ngland 
 would probably increase in (quantity. 
 Many descriptions of hardware, glass 
 and pigments would be bought in Eng- 
 
S7 
 
 e ]>ei' 
 
 Im- 
 
 Ti'eat 
 
 ining 
 
 to be 
 
 luda. 
 
 )oi'ts 
 
 $3,- 
 
 ^ of 
 
 ines 
 
 )ear. 
 
 )urs 
 
 gher 
 
 per 
 
 tlU' 
 
 of 
 uch 
 oine 
 of 
 o be 
 and 
 ity. 
 lass 
 :ng- 
 
 1,111(1 insfcnd of (Jcnnniiy, and raw 
 siii^iii's would coMif fi'oiii the Hritish 
 \\'('.>t fndioa instoad of (/'iiba. On th»^ 
 oth<'r hand CafiMdlan liiiib«'r would 
 have sonic advantaj^c in the markets 
 of Knj.^land over that fi-oni Norway 
 or Hussin, and nianufactiuvd 
 hnnber now supplied by the Ignited 
 States and Norway eoidd be furnished 
 from Canada. The trade in grain, 
 Hour, farm prodner, rattle, fish and 
 l)etroleum with Great Hritnin would be 
 stimulated, and very possilily it might 
 bo found that certain minerals now 
 supi>lied by other countries would be 
 supplied from Canada to England. 
 
 Sometimes tYnf opjK)nents of such a 
 plan as Mr. Hofmeyr's are good enough 
 to consider the nuitter as it would 
 affect Canada, and tell us that Canada 
 " in its own interest, wants a differen- 
 " tial duty on grain, meat and other so- 
 " called raw materials." Now, it can 
 safely be state^d that no such wish has 
 been expressed by the people or press 
 generally, or by any of the Govern- 
 ments. The country is perfectly well 
 satisfied with the power it at present 
 possessesofregulatingitsown tariff, and 
 the (piestio'i of differential duties has 
 been brought to the front principally 
 by the advocates of Imperial Federa- 
 tion, and with the design of interesting 
 Canadians in the movement. We re- 
 pudiate the idea that Canadian Federa- 
 tionists advocate differential duties or 
 an Imperial tariff exclusively in the in- 
 terest of Canada, and maintain that 
 these would be equally, if not far 
 more beneficial to England and the rest 
 of the Empire. 
 
 The proceeds of the Imperial revenue 
 duty in India would be aliout £400,000, 
 and being levied on her foreign im- 
 ports, which are now mostly free, 
 would hardly be felt. Here too, Eng- 
 lish manufacturers would be benefitted, 
 
 as conipared with thos»> fiom other 
 parts of KuiDpe, from Cliiiia or the 
 I'^nited States. With regard to rndiun 
 exports, moi-e cotton, rice, wlieat and 
 tea would lie gj-own, and perliaps m;iny 
 varieties of timlier 1h> sent to England 
 which are now obtained from Central 
 and South America. 
 
 As regards the W«'st Indies, there 
 cannot be any doubt that the extra 
 Imperial duty of five per cent, would 
 favoiu-ably affect the sugar plantjit ions 
 in .lamaica, liarbadoes, Trinidad and 
 Demarara, and siuvly this advantage 
 would not be grudged by anyone to an 
 inteiest which has suffered so severely 
 from luifair competition on the part of 
 foreign couiitri<>s. Many of us, indeed, 
 believ*' that <luties should be levied on 
 foreignsugars,e(iuivaleiit tot he amount 
 of botmty, of which they have the 
 benefit, and the proposetl duty \vould 
 tend slightly in this direct ion. It would 
 also favour the trade in colfee, cocom, 
 mahogany and dye-woods with IJi-itish 
 Honduras, British Guiana iind the 
 \Ve«t India Islands i-ather than with 
 Guatemala, Mexico, Ecuador, Brazil, 
 Venezuela and Hayti. Fruit, diugs 
 and India rubber from the British 
 tropics would also have the advantage. 
 
 Australasia's contribution towards 
 Imperial defence by means of the five 
 percent. Imperial j-evenue duty would 
 amount to £::{IS7,(HK) and take the plnce 
 of .£l2t5,(XK) which she has agreed to pay 
 for tlie protection of her tlo;iting trade. 
 It cannot be imagined that Australia 
 will make any objection to this increase, 
 seeing tiiat New South Wales was the 
 first British colony to send, at its own 
 cost and completely equipped, a con- 
 tingent of troops to aid the Imperial 
 forces, and that Victoi'ia was the only 
 colony that offered naval assistance 
 to the Admiralty under the Colonial 
 Naval Defence Act. If any induce- 
 
 i!- 
 
 ri 
 
 
M 
 
 rtW'tit wero ri>(|iiif(Hl it iniKlit \w 
 foitiul ill th(* conHidcratioii tliat 
 lu«r iiicntH, wiiu', wool and coitpfr, 
 to^cthtT with tile fl.'ix, ^iiiiih ami 
 pcenliar tiiiibfi's of New Zealand would 
 liav»' a pr«'f(M'(Mic(." In IJritish and 
 Indian port.s. 
 
 In what partiful.ir PianiH-r West 
 Africa, and other diHtaiit islands and 
 jxissf'ssions, would he atlVctcd it is not 
 Casv to siiy, hut w»> hiiw .Mr, Hofiii«>yr's 
 fiHsurancH that the burden would not 
 he felt in the Cnpe of (hhmI Hope. 
 Possibly there may be found )>eople 
 Nultlciently unjust and uiu-haritable to 
 Bay that Mi*. Hofnieyr made his pro- 
 posal in tlie interest of Houth Afriai, 
 and that its contribution of lijO.OCM) 
 nniiiially would be Kiven «)nly to obtain 
 ndvantaKes in other (luarters, but no 
 on«^ who reads Mr. Hofineyr's speech 
 will say that it savours of selfishness. 
 
 As to foreign countries, they have 
 thrown in the faces of British political 
 economists their advice to adopt free 
 trade principles, and cannot complain 
 of our imitatiiif;^ their jjolicy to the 
 limited extent of exacting some slight 
 ecpiivalent for permission to trade in 
 our markets. After all, even they 
 would derive some benefit from the 
 proposed tax, f«)r the British navy is 
 the marine police force of the wt)i'ld 
 and from it the commerce of all civilis- 
 ed rations derives unacknowledged, 
 perhaps unsuspected, but nevertheless 
 substantial, benefits. 
 
 The llofmeyer principle has been 
 before the public ff)r its consideration 
 ever since the meeting of the Colonial 
 Conference, and Imperial Federation- 
 ists have iiad it before them ever since 
 the publication of my paper in 1886, but 
 up to the present writing it has failed 
 to obtain the approval of the Imperial 
 Federation Jjeague. It is true that in 
 December, 1890, the cvgan of the 
 
 L(>ague expressed itself as follows : — 
 " The principle of the llofmeyr scheme 
 " is one which thoroughly commends 
 " itself to this Journal, and we believe 
 '* we may say t(t the league at large," 
 but so far approval has not been ex- 
 pressed in a formal re8->lution of the 
 |>arent body. Even in the leading 
 article from which the foregoing tpiota- 
 t-ation is taken, the editor is very care- 
 ful to distinguish between approvjil of 
 the llofmeyr priiu^iple, and a'ccptance 
 of any thing lik(> ('ommercial rnion. 
 He says '* \Ve cannot too (»ften make 
 •' clear our position that we do i ♦, re- 
 *' gard Commercial Union as ii) any 
 •' way constituting a condition prece- 
 •' dent of Imperial Federation, or even 
 " as in any very direct way leading up 
 " to it. We shoidd Im' ratlu;r inclini'd 
 " to say that it is more likely to lollow 
 ** Feileratioii than to precede it." 
 
 Sometimes an adherent of the League 
 ventures scpiarely to cxjiress disap- 
 proval, and the following (piotation 
 may be given in order to show what 
 means wouhl, in certain cpiarters, be 
 preferred to the llofmeyr plan for i-ais- 
 ing an Imperial Revenue :— " It would 
 " be much better for England to pay 
 " her quota to the Imperial Exchequer 
 •' direct, as c. y. by income tax, or out 
 " of the Consolidated Fund. Failing 
 " this, the Canadian suggestion made 
 " some time ago with regard to a tcu- 
 *' nage rate on all shipping entering 
 "any port throughout the Emp' 
 " would be a btitter plan than a ta 
 "raw materials. If, how r, '' 
 " decided to adopt the cipir 
 
 "direct taxation, how wo. i it be lo 
 " agree upon a universal tax on spii its 
 •' or tobacco, and allot that to Impi iiil 
 " purposes?" 
 
 It may be worth while to enquire 
 what this would i-eally amount to com- 
 pared with the taxation proposed by 
 
 t 
 
Mr. Ilnfiiu'vr. Tli«^ vahic of fortMXn 
 iiuports iiitii (in>:i! Hritiiiii Miiioinits to 
 ^2S(i,.'>(MMH)U Miiiiually, iiiul liin 2 per 
 c«'nt. duly iIhtj'oh would yield i'),~'.il,- 
 J«J(). To I'liisc an t'(j\ial aiuouiit by an 
 i'Xcim> tax on .-.pirits, fi-onj wliictli at 
 pnvsent tifatly tliiiti'cnniillion.sHtHilinK 
 uic dnivi'd in (ii-oat Britain, would 
 it'ipiirc that til.' present d\ities Ikmh- 
 ci-eased aliout I') per cent. With regard 
 to toJ>ac<'o, which at pi-esent prixluces 
 ^9,l{tl7,()(K), the duty upon it would have 
 to he inci'ea.si'd (H pei' cent, in ordc'i' t<» 
 provi<le the i.'),7Ml,(H)(» obtainable by 
 Mr. Hofnieyr's Imperial tariff. That 
 the n*Mi-teetotallei*s or sn»)kei'H <)f tlie 
 I'^nited KiiiKdoui, who at present con- 
 tribute nioi-e tliiin one-thii-d of the 
 entire revenue of the country, would 
 mnsent t<» .sui-ii Iieavy additional tax- 
 ation, even for the sake of a United 
 Empire, does not seem likely. Beside.s 
 this waj' of providinj? a couinion 
 revenue would nut have the slii^htest 
 wffect in uniting; and encouraging the 
 counnercial interests of the Empire. 
 So far as theii- se\ <-i'al markets are con- 
 cerned, lOnf^lislnuiMi, Anglu-lndinnsand 
 colonists would l)e on the sanje footing 
 as aliens, and still continue to he as 
 foreigners to each other so far as con- 
 cerned their ti-ade interests. 
 
 The (luolations from English sourer ^ 
 which have just lieen given will shevv 
 that tiiere is a certain class at home 
 which entertains notions antagonistic 
 to anything like drawing revenue from 
 customs, and who want free imi)orts, 
 as they frecpiently want peace, at 
 "any price." They admit the necessity 
 of obtaining an Imperial Revenue 
 from reliable sources, but the idea of 
 incitlentally beneiitting British com- 
 me ' is rigidly excluded from all their 
 pn sals. We are to raise the money 
 i- ny or every way, provided we do 
 Uc atteiupt to give each other any aid 
 
 or comfort in s«) doing. There are to 
 Im* no preferences to Mritish ctMnuiuni- 
 ties, and iJngland especially niu^t not 
 think of su(!h a thing as industrial self- 
 pi-otection. When Mr. Ilofnu-yer 
 brought forward his scheme he was 
 careful to explain that it did not n:<>an 
 protection, and in the foicgoing chap- 
 ters |>ains have been taken toelaboiate 
 this view, but it is to be feared that no 
 human effort is capable of removing 
 prejudice from the inindsof those who 
 have pronounced in favour of so-called 
 Free Trade. It is probably in vain to 
 attempt further to convince such 
 minds that oiu* ctintentions are well 
 founded, and it may be more profitable 
 to "carry the war intt> Africa," and 
 endeavour to shew that Free Trade 
 does not favour British luiity and tliat 
 England's present fiscal system is any- 
 thing but helpful to the cause of 
 Imperial defence. 
 
 It is often said that when peace pre- 
 vails thi'u is the time to i)rrpare for 
 war, and how can that be better done 
 than by strengthening our capitalists, 
 manufacturers and artisans, so that 
 wlien war does come they may be the 
 better able to stand the taxation which 
 it involves ? Why should not England 
 adopt the newest and best means f(tr 
 improving her commerce as well as her 
 army and navy ? Why should she not, 
 in times of peace, nxlopt the best plan 
 for retaining, within the borders of her 
 own territory, the brave men and 
 skilled workmen who are so indispens- 
 able in time of war ? All shades of 
 politicians in England seem to-day to 
 be of one mind as to the necessity of 
 providing for Imperial defence, and no 
 doubt it is of the greatest importance, 
 but it would seem possible to maintain 
 that the advantages of union and im- 
 proved tactics in defending agriculture, 
 manufactiu-es, trade and commerce, in 
 
 i- 
 I 
 
 > • < 
 
 if:' 
 
eo 
 
 a reasonable way, are just as tangible 
 as in the case of naval and military 
 defence. Without well considered 
 action for favouring home industries, 
 shortsighti^d nations may sometimes 
 suffer very severely. Even England 
 occasionally resembles an over-p]u(^ky 
 pugilist who pits himself against an 
 opponent clad in a mail shirt and 
 armed with a revolver. In times of 
 depression she sometimes suffers more 
 than if war were actually proclaimed. 
 She may be said to be at war in time 
 of peace, but fighting with her hands 
 tied, and with her lields and factories 
 open to the inroads of every foreign 
 enemy. For while England leaves her 
 agriculture and manufacturing entirely 
 defenceless, foreign nations establish 
 on their frontiers a series of forts 
 called customs-houses, behind which 
 their farmei's and artisans not only 
 live and labour securely, but wage un- 
 grateful and unecjual war on British 
 industry. And farther, while England 
 derives the sinews of war by direct 
 levy from her own people, other 
 countries, the United States, for in- 
 stance, contrive to (^xt^irt it to a large 
 extent from English maiui''acturers. 
 And still further, while the Chancellor 
 of the Exchequer has trouble enough 
 to provide for the interest on England's 
 huge national debt, mainly created in 
 fighting the battles of other naticms, 
 the United States manages to pay off 
 the principal of their d(>bt contracted in 
 putting down a rebellion. How astute 
 must that nation be which causes for- 
 eigners to pay the cost of her civil 
 war 1 How magnanimous that other 
 nation which takes money direct 
 from the pockets of her own people to 
 pay for foreign conflicts ! Foreigners 
 hav^e fred' access to English markets, 
 while home produces have heavy direct 
 taxes to pay. The interest on the 
 
 enormous national debt is taken out of 
 the pocketsofthe.English people, while 
 the German and the Spaniard, for the 
 defence of whose lil)erties it was con- 
 tracted, are not allowed to contribute 
 one shilling in the shape of diities on 
 the goods with which they flood the 
 markets of Great Britain. It is well 
 that our rulers should provide for the 
 protection of om* coasts and cities, but 
 it is dastardly to permit the bombard- 
 ment and desti-uction of British in- 
 dustries from behind the well protected 
 trade ramparts of foi-eign countries, 
 without so much as saying one diplo- 
 matic word in objection to the practice. 
 The following quotation from an 
 American writer expresses a similar 
 view : — " It is clear that the patriotism 
 which can sleep through this industrial 
 warfare, and suffer this trade spolia- 
 tion, and can only be roused into 
 activity by the danger and passion of 
 flagrant war ; which can vole the 
 public m(»ney to maintain rarely-used 
 armies" navies and forts, b\it cannot 
 give the slightest aid or comfort to the 
 real and constant defeders of its 
 country's independence — its industrial 
 soldiers, is a patriotism belonging to 
 periods long gone by, and is of little 
 more present use than a bow aiid 
 arrow." 
 
 Not only does England refuse to pro- 
 tect her own industries, but she actu- 
 ally encourages foreigners to make war 
 on them. It sometimes awakc^ns sur- 
 prise that she should supply ff)reign 
 nations with war ships, and lend them 
 money that may possibly be used 
 against herself. But that she shoidd 
 give aliens advantages, in her own 
 markets, over her own citizoui^ really 
 surpasses comprehension. Yei, that is 
 what some people in England are now 
 complaining of. Under her present sys- 
 tem this is what happens : — " The 
 
its 
 atrial 
 
 g to 
 little 
 
 and 
 
 pr<i- 
 ictn- 
 wai- 
 siir- 
 eigii 
 hern 
 used 
 lould 
 own 
 eally 
 at in 
 now 
 
 The 
 
 61 
 
 " Commission recently appointed to 
 " exan'ine into the causes of Dcpres- 
 " si(^n of Trade is an evidence that 
 " depression exists, ^^'heat growers 
 " are ruined. Hop growers are luined. 
 " A.?riculturists generally are at 
 '' their wit's ends, and tliej- see no hope 
 " in the futui-e. Farms in good situa- 
 " tions are without tenants. The 
 " sugar - reftning indiistry, and the 
 " silk industry have all been ruined. 
 "Land and house projierty have 
 " gr»>atly decreased in value. The 
 " nund)er of uneniplf>yed is enormous, 
 " and the cry is for increased facilities 
 " for emigation." (British Agriculture 
 and Industries, hy Robert Boyd ; Man- 
 chester, 1SS8). Another author, in 
 jn'oposing a remedy for this state f)f 
 things, says :— '■ AVe ask for no i)i-ohi- 
 " bitive or absurd duties ; we simply 
 " ask that the foreigner shall be taxed 
 " in the same i>roj)ortion as our- 
 " selves." The people who demand a 
 change do not exclaim against "free 
 trade " because nothing of the sort is 
 now in existence. Under real Free 
 Trade the condition of p]nglish capital 
 and labour woidd not be so deplorable. 
 The system now prevaling is that of 
 free imports only, the exports of the 
 United Kingdom being taxed in foreign 
 ports as never before. " Free im])orts " 
 and "fettered ex])orts" cannot consti- 
 tute "free trade." On the contrary, 
 they combine to form a very unfaii-and 
 foolish system which has been called 
 "unrestricted importation," by Lord 
 Salisbury, and is in trutli a species of 
 Protection, i.e.. Protection to the for- 
 eigner. I\lr. Boyd, one of the .Mutliors 
 above cpioted, puts the matter in the 
 following shape : — 
 
 " E(inal incidence of taxation -that 
 " is, taxing imported gof)dsatthe same 
 " rate at which similar goods are taxed 
 " if produced in the country— is not 
 
 " Protection ; but the omission to im- 
 " pose e(iual incidcMice of taxation is 
 "Protection to the consumer and the 
 " foreign producer at tlie expense of 
 "the home producer, allliougii ei-ro- 
 " neonsly called Free Trade." 
 
 " To represent this in figures, on the 
 " basis of 12A per cent, being the 
 "average of taxation in England, it 
 " will be thus :— 
 
 " .V) percent. im{)oi-t duty woidd be 
 " Prote<'ti()n to Knglish industry to the 
 
 I " extent of Slh per cent. 
 
 " 2o per cent import duty would be 
 
 I " Protet^tion to English industry to the 
 " extent of 12A i)er cent. 
 
 " 12\ per ci'ut. import duty would be 
 " eipial incidence of taxation, and 
 " could not justly be called Protection. 
 " 5 per cent, import duty would be 
 " Protection to the foreigner to the 
 " extent of 7\ per cent. 
 
 " No import duty would be Protec- 
 " tion to the foreigner to the extent of 
 " 12.^ per cent. 
 
 " The last line represents the present 
 " position of the trade of England. It 
 "also gives a view well undei-stood 
 "already, 1 am afraid, by all foreigners 
 "of th(^ perspiracity of the British 
 "nation in granting to them, free of 
 " all cliarge, the use of a market whicli 
 " costs us a hundred and fifty millions 
 " sterling a year for its maintenance." 
 Not contfnit with refusing to protect 
 her own ind\istri(\s. and gratidtously 
 
 ' sui'i'endei'ing her miii'kets to foreign 
 
 ! producers, Great Britain goes fiu'tiier 
 and seems to constMit while the latter 
 
 i bribe her own peo})le to coniiiv*- at the 
 destruction of eei-tain industiies and 
 intei-ests long (•stabli>hed within the 
 
 I Empire. The bounties paid by France 
 
 ' and Germany on the export of beet 
 root sugai' enable it to be sold to the 
 consumers in luigland under cost, and 
 
 ■ for this bribe, say of a ]H'iuiy per 
 
 It 
 
 t 
 
 4 
 
 m 
 
 : V 
 
 n. 
 
 I 
 
 i'X 
 
 ^ 
 
62 
 
 poniul on the siijj^ar they use, tho iii- 
 hiihitants of the Uuited Kingdom 
 have U)oke(l cahnly on whihi their own 
 refineries were being destroyed, and 
 the cane i)lantations of theii' Colonial 
 fellow - siihjeets wi-re going out of 
 cultivation. Siieh bounties were long 
 ago coiidenuu'd by the greatest writers 
 on political econcwny, but the bribe 
 seems to have be'Mi powerful enough to 
 stiMe free trade principle. No 
 countervailing duties have been im- 
 posed, and so far as bounty-fed sugar 
 is concerned, the tratfic in it may well 
 be stigmatised as "Foul Trade." No 
 folder trad(i has ever been carried on 
 since the time when the (irand iNIon- 
 arch bribed thi^ Merry MonaiT-h to 
 undei-mine and desteoy the liberties of 
 Kngland. Help was found then, not 
 among her foremost statesmen, who 
 were all pursuing their own selfish 
 
 aims, but in thestrongwill ainl honesty 
 of piu'pose of Wiiliai.i >>l Orange. 
 And now it would seem a- if Iielp were 
 to come, in the Avay it did I hen. from 
 across the ocean; from thosf daughter 
 nations of l^^rigland wh.i have all ex- 
 perienced the benefits of • (".lir Tiod'c- 
 tion." AVilliam put an .nd to the 
 "fold trade" of two ceni mics ago and 
 prom])lly disnnsed IJarillon, tiie 
 French aftd)assador, the ag.-nt through 
 whom it had been amMnpiished. 
 ■similarly, let us hope thai tln' intiuence 
 of the great Colonies and i ln' necessity 
 for providing an Imperial IN'vcmu' and 
 constituting a. Commercial I 'nion wit h- 
 in the Emi)ire will, in tin- neai' fiitui-e. 
 put an end to that system ol' national 
 bribery cal Km! " UnTestri<i<-d Importa- 
 tion," which has so long pifnailcd in 
 the Mother Country. 
 
 CHAPTER YIII. 
 
 A Parliament of Parliaments. 
 
 When Mr. Hofnieyer made his pro- 
 j)osal at the Colonial Confei'ence for 
 creating an Imperial revenue, one of 
 the reasons he gave for prefi'rring it to 
 a system of subsidies was that tlie 
 latter "would practically amount to a 
 tax, and where you have a tax the 
 people who bear the tax sooner or laU>r 
 ask to be I'epivsented." He was evi- 
 dently of opinion that the advantage 
 which would accrue to all parts of the 
 iMupiie. from a system of discrimina- 
 tion in fa vol- of British Trade, would be 
 
 sufficient com))ensation t'or ilieirvai-i- 
 ! ous contributions by mean- of the Im- 
 perial revenue duty. It i^virydoubt- 
 ! fill whether tliis view wnnld Se accept- 
 I ed generally. Duties on imports. e\ en 
 when the latter are foicign. ai'c taxes 
 nevertheless, and howevfc iinlirect tin' 
 I manner of conti-ibnting t"\\ards Im- 
 I perial purposes might be. ii would in- 
 I fallibly bring with it a drmand for 
 I i-epresentation. " Notaxai ion without 
 i-epresentation," is a poliiiial axiom 
 which seems at the j)ri'Sfiit day to be 
 
1 
 
 68 
 
 iiiiiv('i>;ill\ ;i.'.('ptecl. 
 
 How to iHovido such rf'prest'iitiitioii 
 tortile vjirions pt'oplcs oF the British 
 iMiipiiu' is .1 pi-ohlem the disc-ussioii of 
 wliicli iiior-t |"'o])]e would gladly pt)st- 
 poiie, until ^oMK^ other pr(i)aratt)ry 
 step had l).<ii proposed and taken to- 
 wai'ds Iin|M rial Fedi'ration. lint it 
 wo\dd setni impossihlo to delay the 
 eonsiderat ion of this suhjeet in view of 
 the fact tiiat the first step nnist al- 
 ways he taxation ft)r imperial pur- 
 poses. ( '<iMi riliut ions towards the 
 coninion (Icr.-in-e or the improvement 
 of the meaii> of coninumication with- 
 in the lOnipii-'-. nuist heget a claim for 
 represent;!! ion in aji Imperial Parlia- 
 ment. Tin House of Lords and the 
 House of (Untnions in I'^nj^land are 
 loijjether trcpiently called the " Ini- 
 pt'iial Parliament," hut this is i>r()l)ahly 
 only hy ccvHrtesy. How can a i)arlia- 
 MUMit oi' ; ministiy he truly Imperial 
 which is t lie I reation exclusively of the 
 inhaltitjini-- of the I'liited Kiui^dom? 
 It is unjust that Colonists who may 
 have to siilli-r severely in time (jf war! 
 should ha\i' nothing to say :is regard.s 
 till' condmi of foreign affairs, ujion ' 
 which till' iniit inuaiu-e of i)eace or the 
 out hi'ejik III' \\ ar de[)ends. 
 
 'i'liis consideration is one which re- 
 ceived a ,l;i <r(! share of attention at thi> ! 
 time the Imp-'cial Federation League! 
 was formed in l']ngland, Jind tlu'lale 
 Ml". Forstci- cN pressed himself I'eganling 
 it in the full.iwing words: - " If we ;isk 
 the ("olonifs to tax themselvi's foi- (K'- 
 fence againsi possihle att.-.rk from 
 foi'(Mgn i)ON\ t-rs. if we remind tliem that 
 it is iu>t jn>t that we at home should 
 hear moi'i' than our fair share of the' 
 cost of proi t'.i lug them from invasion, 
 we must, coid'ess that theii- demand for ' 
 some jiartii ipation in impeiial foreign j 
 policy will L.',itlier strcMigth, and there- | 
 fore again \\<" come to the conclusion 
 
 (that, if the Fmpire is not to he hroken 
 u|), there must he an organization for 
 
 jmuiual defi'uce, and for common con- 
 
 j trol of foreign policy." 
 
 .Mr. Forster alsoaddressed himself to 
 the discussicin of tlie proposals which 
 
 i had l)e(Mi madi' for the parliamentary 
 
 I representation of the whole J'hnpire, 
 
 ! and his views should certainly he made 
 the starting point for considei'ing the 
 l)rohlcm of an Imperial Sejiate. He 
 says (for although dead he speaketh,) 
 "There are two proj)osals for parlia- 
 luentaiy ivpresentation. (1) The ad- 
 
 ' mission into the House of Commons of 
 memhers for the Colonies.and prohahly 
 at the same tinu", an addition to the 
 House of Lords of Colonial Peers. 
 (L!) Tlie foiination of a new and jiar- 
 
 i amount represeatative assemhly, which 
 shall hear the same relation to oui' Par- 
 liament at home, atul also to the Par- 
 iir.ment of the Dominion and of tlu; 
 other Colonies, as that which ( 'ougress 
 heai's to the American State Legisla- 
 tures, or the (ierman Reichstag to the 
 Prussian or Ba;ai'ian Landtags." 
 
 " In the one case the Colonial i-epre- 
 sentatives wouM sit in a house which 
 would discuss andat lenii)t to solve, iiot 
 only all imperial (juestions. hut all 
 those affecting the imperial govei'ii- 
 ment of the United Kingdom ; and in 
 the other case they would he mendu-rs 
 of an assemhly which cnncerned itself 
 with im])eri;il (piestions oidy. 
 
 " Now th<' iii'st of t iiese jiroposals ap- 
 pears to me imi>ract icahle i ir at any 
 rate most ditticult to work. Tlii> col- 
 onial representatives nught he mem- 
 hei-s of the House of Connnoiis either 
 with or without the jxiwei- of taking 
 l)ai't in home legislation ; if tlu'y j>os- 
 sessed such power, their intei'ference 
 would he looked upon with jealousy: if 
 they did not poss(\-;s it, their exclusion 
 would h(> l)oth ditticult and ohnoxious ; 
 
64 
 
 and it would not bp easy to dr.iw tlu' 
 lilies lu'twixt inijx'riiil and donn'stic 
 questions, or to deride wlu'ii tlu' Colon- 
 ial lueniher should be debarred from 
 voting or speaking. True, it would be 
 I)ossible in theory to avoid this anoma- 
 lous position ; the Jissembly represent- 
 ing both the rJnited Kingdom and the 
 Colonies might deal with the internal 
 all'airs of the Colonies as W(!ll as with 
 those f)f the I'uited Kingdom ; but it 
 will be admitted that in jjractice this 
 arrangement could not work. The 
 Colonies would n(}t accept it for a mo- 
 ment, and they would be right in their 
 refusal, for the large majority of the 
 governing i)ody would have neither the 
 knowledge nor thi' will t(» attend to 
 their aifairs. In conii)arison witli (pies- 
 tions airecting I'^ngland or Ireland or 
 Scotland, those relating to Canada, 
 Australia oi" the (^ape woidd be neglect- j 
 ed : the ]iarlianientary block would be j 
 intolerable. Neither the i)resent House 
 of Commons, nor any possible repre- 
 sentative assembly, with any |)()ssible 
 division of labour would be able to add 
 to the supervision of foieign policy, 
 and the provision for the army and 
 navy, not merely the multiform sub- 
 jects for legislation and discussion, 
 every day increasing in number, which 
 affect the relatit)ns of the inhabitants 
 of the United Kingdom to one another 
 and to their government, but also 
 similar questions in the colonies with 
 all their varied interests and condi- 
 tions. 
 
 " These objections Avould not api)b 
 to the Congress proposed. There is 
 nothing anomalous oi- in itself imprac- 
 ticable in an Iiu))erial Parliament with 
 suboi'dinate Parliaments ; but, though 
 it may be the ultimate form of fedei*a- 
 tion, I tliink at present any attempt 
 to establish it would be prematiu'e. 
 This proposal would, I fear, be regard- 
 
 ed with somesu.siiicion in the Colonies, 
 for ])opuIous and rich and powerful as 
 many of them already are, they are 
 yet aware that at present and for some 
 time to come, they would be dwarfed 
 individually, and even if combined 
 would be weak in comparison with 
 England ; and there is no denying that 
 the project would be startling, and at 
 first sight unacceptable to Britishpublic 
 opinion. Why, it would be said, force 
 ui)on us tlui difficulties of a paper Con- 
 stitution and State Rights, and the 
 necessity of some tribunal to decide 
 when tliese rights are infringed or un- 
 duly extended?" 
 
 From this(piotation it is evident that 
 Mr, Forster looketl upon a representa- 
 tion of the Empire in the House of 
 Commons as an impossibility, and in- 
 deed the peoi)l(M)f the Uniteil Kingdom 
 did decide, when appealed to, not 
 very long since, against Home 
 Rule, and that the House of 
 Commons should continue to be 
 the Parliament of Great Britain and 
 Ireland. To propose colonial lepresent- 
 ation in it would be as unreasonable as 
 to give the United Kingdom represent- 
 ation in the Dominion Parliament. An 
 Im))erial Senate should not be subject 
 to disruption and dissolution at the will 
 of any local political party in England 
 or elsewhere. 
 
 Ml'. Forster further regarded the 
 formation of an uppermost Imperial 
 House as an undertaking of the most 
 extreme dilticulty. This is a view 
 similar to that of Sir Charles Tiipper 
 who could not see much hope for Par- 
 liamentary Federation in our day, bv 
 cause it seemed to involve the creatit)n 
 of a Supreme Parliament over the pre- 
 sent Houses of Lords and Commons. 
 In a most able essay (one of those pre- 
 sented to the London Chamber of Com- 
 merce, and selected for pid^ication) it 
 
65 
 
 h;is l)f>on shown by Mr. ('. V. Smitli, | tliis i(l(>;i points (»ut tlu> rifi^ht (Hn-ciion 
 tli.it to create ;m r)iflrc!i/ mic Federal in wliich to work for the rejilisntiou of 
 Hfii'liiiineiit would involve a ehango ! a scjieine of InijH'rial representation, 
 of the most ladieal :uid sweepiiifj; ^ This we are inelined to niaintaii', al- 
 desei'iption, and subject the Kng- | thouf;h Lord Hosehery is since reiioitcd 
 lish Constitution to too sevei'o a ; to have said that thoj-e is a f.ital ohjec- 
 sti'ain. If such anew creation were j tion lo tiie introduction of Colonial re- 
 indeeil indispensable tlie dii!icnlty pi'eseniatives into the House of liOi'ds, 
 would he veiy great, but it would be j which is "that the colonies do not 
 well to ask whether this is really the ] want them thei-e." This remai-k may 
 case. "Would not the necessity for the ^ bo true if aj)plied to the Cpper House 
 invention of .•! completely new upper- I as at present constituted, but it would 
 most House disappear if the present not apply if it were, with i)roi)ei de- 
 Hou.s«; of Lords could be utilised y liberation, transformed into a Parlia- 
 
 The idea of represent ing the Colonies ment for the Empire, 
 tliere has been put forv.aid l)y another | No doubt the House of Lords has 
 of the leaders of the Federation move- "already emjdial ically i-efused the ;i|)- 
 meiit. Lord liosebery, in the followinji: peal made by Lord Rosebery to in- 
 words :— " As regards attentative ex- i stit\ite an iiKiuiiy wheth<>r its constitu- 
 periment in the direction we are seek- | tion as a legislative and r(>pi'es(iitative 
 ing, I may he considered to be a person j body does not stand in some need of 
 of one idea on this subject ; but I do revision after the we.'ir and tear of 
 be!iev(! it might seriously be considered ! sev<'n himdred years." Hut the House 
 by the House of Lords, if delegates j of Lords has also given frequent proofs 
 from the ('olonies might not be ad- [ that it knows when to yield, and it 
 nutted to sit as do delegates in the | „iijrht perhaps be prevailed ujjon to le- 
 Senate of the United States. Of course form itself and become a usefid Im- 
 that would be a hirge change, but not j perial Institution. At the present time 
 so large as it at first appears. The there seems to be a class of people in 
 main objection always urged is that of ' England, who, littl(> though they real- 
 distance. I think that question has is^ it and little as they may desire it, 
 been conclusively dealt with by .Air. are pivpai-ing the minds of theEnglish 
 Smith," (the present leader of the people f,,r such a chang<' by their per- 
 House of Commons), "but I would sistency in lowering the tont> of the 
 point out an even more recent illustra- House of Connnons, while disparaging 
 tion. I i-efer to the State of California fh^ House of Lords. Wliy should th;it 
 which, when a territory and at a dis- Upper Ifcusc be gradually .leprive.l of 
 tance of weeks from the main seat of every sphere of usefulness-' Why 
 Government, sent delegates to the should it not rather become the Pailia- 
 Senate of the Cnited States without nuMit of tin- 15i-itish Federation ? 
 the slightest ditTiculty. I do not be- The dmiculties in the way of su.-h a 
 lieve in the di«icnlty of distance; and change weald soon disappear, if the 
 I believe a tentative experiment in the j House of Loi'ds would consent to re- 
 H(.use of Lords would not interfere construct itself, pi'ovide for the aboli- 
 with the financial conti'ol of the House tion of hereditary membeiship, the 
 <»f ('omnKms over the affairs of the ; election to it for life of English 
 Empire." There can be no doubt that j Peers, and the representation in it of 
 
 i 
 
PT 
 
 06 
 
 all i)ivi'ts of the Kiiipifo. Tliis sooms to 
 he the least (liilicult way in \vhic-!i to 
 CTJuate an Tini)(>rinl Senate. It may 
 may seem abstird to niake siwh a pro- 
 position in view ot" the fael tliat ihe 
 total aholition of the House of Lords 
 has been suKJ^ested. Still no one 
 <lreams that this can lie done without 
 their consent. The I^i»|)ei' House is not 
 likely to commit political suicide and 
 any other coni'se. would he revolution- 
 ary. To fpeak of abolition is therefore 
 worse than useless, but it woidd not he 
 impertinent to ask that tlietfouseof 
 Lords should so change its constitution 
 as to beconu* tlie hi^^diest legislative 
 body in, and bo i-eprcsentative of the 
 whole British Kmpii'e. Moreover the 
 reform of the House of TiOids is a sub- 
 ject which has of late seriously engafj:- 
 ed public attention, and leadinjj; Uritish 
 statesmen have expressed themselves 
 ref^arding it in such a manner as to 
 sIh'W that it is now within the sphere 
 of practical politics. It has heretofore 
 
 been considered maiidv from an Eiip-- ' 
 
 I 
 lish point ot view, the L'pper House 
 
 being of course regarded as part of the 
 parliament of the I'nited Kmgdom. ] 
 The House of Ijords does not however 
 seem to be indisi)ensal)ly necessary for 
 the good government of the British 
 Isles, and sui'ely a legislative body of 
 such anti(juity. dignity and stability is 
 fitted for a higher i)m'posethan mi'rely 
 t^onfirming the decisions of tlie Lnglish 
 House of Commons. The "expansion 
 of England," and thi' miilli{)licat ion of 
 colonial communitii's, owning allegi- 
 ance ti the British Ct-owu are smely ' 
 demonstrating the necessity of some I 
 Imperial re[)i'esentative body in which 
 their various sentiments and interests 
 might find expression and protection, 
 and it would jn-obably ultimately be 
 found to be matter for regret, slioidd a 
 reform of the House of Lords now be 
 
 attempted and cai-ried out without re- 
 ference tf» ("o^ouii'.l reipiii'enients. 
 H' seems, thei'el'ore, projx'r to discuss 
 the subject fr-oui a Colonial standpoint. 
 And to ascertain whether ihe Hon; t- of 
 Lords might not, with advantage to all 
 concerned, be so rt-constructed as to 
 become the PailianuMit of the British 
 Empire. 
 
 From I'ocent events i*- is j)lain that 
 the House of Commons is likely to 
 remain permanently rt'iti-esentat ive of 
 England, Scotland, Iicland and the 
 islands adjacent. Nor is tliei-c any 
 reason why, in matters concerning the 
 Bi itish Isles, it should not be relieved 
 from the necessity of having all its 
 measures expressly sanctioned by a 
 House of Lords. Although no such 
 conlirmation by any liighei- body wouhl 
 be necessary, the Crown would still 
 possess the right to vt'to any t)f its 
 measures Just as it has this right at pre- 
 sent, as well as the power to disallow 
 Colonial legislation. By removing the 
 consideration of Imperial affairs to an 
 Cppi'r House these woidd not escape 
 the control of the House of Connnons. 
 because it would no doubt have the 
 right to send a delegation to that 
 House if transformed into the Pai'- 
 liament of the fhnpirc, to express 
 its views, and influence legislaiiou and 
 action as regards Imjierial ad'aii's. By 
 this arrangement such a division of the 
 labour of legislation would be elVected 
 as would contribute very materially to 
 the usefulness of btitb Houses. 
 
 In the admirable essay of which 
 mention has already been made. Mi-. 
 C. V. Smith is of opinion that the ad- 
 missi(m of the Colonies (•.•in liest lye ac- 
 com]>lished by their incorporat i<»n iiito 
 the existing English Constitution as 
 contem|)lated by Adam Smith in the 
 following quotation, "There is not the 
 least i)robability that the British Con- 
 
67 
 
 .-il it lit ion would be Iiiirl hyllic I'liioii 
 111' (ii'f.il i'.ritaiii with Ik v Colonios. 
 Thnt ( 'oiisl itiitioii. oil tin- (•(ititriiiy 
 WDiiltl he coiiiplctcd l)y it, and sctnisto 
 l)f imi>','rl'i'ct witlioiit it." The diflicul- 
 tic.s in tlif Way ai'c (Miuinci'alcd by 
 Mr. Siidili as (1) " the (b'stancc in 
 point of spaiT'. and Icn^jtli in point of 
 t iaio, wiiicl; have to Ix' ^,u^niounll'd in 
 t 111- tfan.sil of jxTsoiis and tlic trans- 
 ini.ssion of iiitclliKcncc from diil'ci'cnt 
 parts of the l'anpii'<' to tht- nu'troiu)lis , 
 and (2) the iniprojji'iety as u«ll as ini- 
 I'ossibihtv of all tlii' mat ti-rs which at 
 jjit'st'iir cn^agi- the altrntion of iho 
 I'arliaincnt of West minstrr, as well as 
 ihc addit'onal a/Tails which the change 
 would inevitaiily bring under its con- 
 >idei'at ion, being dealt with by a J'ar- 
 liameut coniijosed of repi'csentatives 
 t'l'oni all i)arts of the I'ani)ii'e. We 
 shall lind upon consideration that the 
 first dilliculty is pui-ely diiniei-ical, and 
 that tlie second is in a fair [)i'ospect of 
 being speedily removed by thi> natural 
 devek)j)nient of I'vents."' Fuilher on 
 Mr. Smitli makes light of the objection 
 as to space and time, and tries to sliow 
 that "the natural devi'lopmeiit of 
 events" will lead to " the establish- 
 ment of .-subordinate legislative bodies 
 in the ditfi-ieiit parts of the United 
 Kingdom for the administration of 
 local alfairs," and make it possible for 
 the present House of Coinmons to i)ay 
 more attention to Imiierial affairs, and 
 to admit representatives from other 
 parts of llie p]mpii-e. Meie it is that 
 Pilr. Smith's conclusions seem quite un- 
 tenable. We are disposed to maintain 
 that the transfer mat ion of the House 
 of Loi'ds into an Imperial parliament 
 is a much easiei' task and would pro- 
 duce a far bettej- result than the r»'con- 
 slruction of the House of t'ommons 
 and the creation of several new legisla- 
 tures within the United Kingdom. 
 
 Without the latter bodies. Mi'. Smilh's 
 plan woiilil bea failure, forlie comes to 
 the same conclusion as did the late Mr. 
 Forstcr with rt'gard to Colonial repn - 
 seutation in the Houst> of ("ommons, 
 namely that "it would be impossiltle 
 to makeany substantial addil ion eithei- 
 to tht> business oi- the numbers of our 
 preseni House of Coimnons. without 
 entirely destroying its elTicieiicy.'" 'i'he 
 constitutional arguments which Mr. 
 Smith advances in favoiirof hisscheme, 
 are of course (Mpially ui)plicable to one 
 which proposes a I'econsti'uct ion of t lie 
 House of Lords. 
 
 When we come to CMUsider tlii' re- 
 pres(>iitation of the whole Hiitish I']m- 
 l)ire, and to attemjit an answer to Sir 
 Hectoi' liangirvin's question, '" Will our 
 representation be based iijion i)oi)uia- 
 tion?" it must s|)eedily be acknow- 
 ledged that the lattei' basis is utterly 
 out of the (piestion. India with its 
 250 millions woidd very (>tfectually pre- 
 vent th<' re;ilisation of anything of that 
 sort. It must also be admitted that 
 anything lik<' i-epresenta I ion by coun- 
 ties or divisions is impossible, A 
 much more concentrated system of ic- 
 presentation must be employed, other- 
 wise the Imperial Senate would be too 
 unwieldy ; and yet we must have 
 something broader than a Federal 
 Coimcil, such as that of Switzt-rland or 
 sudi as was the old CJerman Diet. It 
 would siM'iii most practicable to make 
 the Impeiial Senate repi-eseiitat ive of 
 parliaments rather than peoples; of 
 provinces rather than count ries, of gov- 
 ernments I'ather than of individual 
 electors. This is the idea which has 
 been put foi-ward by Mr. .las. Stanley 
 Little, and which h.as lu'tn tlescrilied 
 by Lady F!(»rence Dixie, as the treat ion 
 of "a Parliament of Parliaments," Mr. 
 Littles ])roposal is that "thepi'esent 
 Imperial l^arliameut, together with 
 
 i: 
 
 I! : 
 
 n 
 
 
m 
 
 OH 
 
 evi'iy folimy, wlirthcr it have or huvf 
 not I'liH iT|»rc,s(Mit!iliv(' insliluiions, 
 shonkl Hcrul fi'om both its Houses cer- 
 tain ilfli-j^atcs dented by (liosr IIoust'H 
 to I'oi ID ail cntii-cly new Iinpc'iial Par- 
 liajiuMil." "Tliis scln'iiic Toi" the im- 
 pastatiou of llw Kiiipiro lias the 
 advanlaK*' of siiiiplifity. and it pro- 
 vides foi- ii kind of doiil)li' sifting pro- 
 cess, wIiorel)y the best and most ex- 
 perieiuied men from each portion of 
 the I<^inj)ir(? wonhl be detained for the 
 purposes of tlie Supreme ('oimeil of 
 tlie whole nation." 
 
 Althoui^h, for reas(ms already given, 
 it is not considered that an "entirely 
 new" parliament would be possible, it 
 seems quite practicable to apply Mr. 
 Little's idea of representing the parlia- 
 ments rather than the peoples of the 
 Empire. In an Imperial Senate, for 
 very good and sullieietit reasons which 
 need not be stated, the United King- 
 dom would requiit; to have the weighti- 
 est voice, but such as would not drown 
 those of theColonicHand Dependencies. 
 On the other hand, for the latter to ex- 
 pect such a number of votes as would 
 enable them to impose their will on the 
 peo})le of England would be highly 
 ridiculous. The most they coukl de- 
 mand would be such a representation 
 as would enable each colony to bi'ing 
 forward and urge its views on any 
 question in the hearing of the assembl- 
 ed wisdom of the Empire. Neither 
 could thej'^ reasonably ask an inliuence 
 out of all proportion to the amounts 
 they might contribute for Imperial 
 pur{)oses. In fact these amounts ought 
 to be the measure of such inlluence, 
 and the joint-stock principle might 
 very well be applied in constituting an 
 Imperial Senate. We shall make the 
 attempt to a})ply it and to reconstruct 
 the House of Lords at the same time, 
 although. this undertaking may appear 
 
 even more rash than the fi'amiiignf 
 an Imperial Budget. 
 
 Supposing that various divisions of 
 the Empire were to contribute towards 
 an Imperial revenue in the shape of 
 a certain amount of duty on their 
 foreign trade, as has been ]>ropos«'d by 
 Mr. Hofmeyer, they would probnitly 
 have to be represeiit"d in pi'ojior- 
 tion to about the following percent- 
 ages : — 
 
 United Kingdom .So.<5 
 
 India, etc 7.2 
 
 ('anada I^.S 
 
 Australasia 2.0 
 
 West Indies, etc. . . . : . l.n 
 
 British Africa (1.4 
 
 m) 
 
 It can be maintained that such a basis 
 as this would be perfectly fair, and 
 prefcj-able to any scheme of repre- 
 sentation according to population, 
 wealth or extent. If these ]ii'opor- 
 tions were adopted in transforming 
 the House of Lords into an Imperial 
 Senate, and assuming that the latter 
 were to consist of 500 members, then 
 the.se would l)e distributi'd in the follow- 
 ing manner : — 
 
 United Kingdom 42S 
 
 India, etc Hti 
 
 Canada, etc li* 
 
 Australasia 10 
 
 West Indies, etc .'> 
 
 British Africa 2 
 
 50(1 
 
 The Lords Spiritual and Temporal at 
 present number 510. Deducting the 
 Princes and Bishops thei-e remain 512. 
 of whom 16 are Scotch elective and 28 
 Irish life peers, besides St) Scotch and 
 Irish lords sitting and voting under 
 English titles. Deducting these also, 
 there remain 370 English Peers who are 
 
2.0 
 
 l.ll 
 
 0.4 
 
 [•iinnwr 
 
 M'ri.il 
 
 liitt.'i- 
 
 then 
 
 )11<)\V- 
 
 42S 
 Hi) 
 li) 
 10 
 
 .T 
 
 5()o 
 
 iral ;)t 
 g Itu- 
 in 512, 
 ■iind 2S 
 h ami 
 umlt'i- 
 i also, 
 \o arc 
 
 mcinlu'is by lu'n'ditary liKHt, tho great 
 majority <>l" tlu'iii taking vciy lit tit- 
 part in tht' business of tin' llonsc. it 
 snrrly wonld not Ih' too nniclitoask 
 the Knglisli Peers to allnw tlieiiiselves 
 to l)e I'epresented, as tlie Irisii Peers 
 are, byaeertain niiinlier ol tiieniselvi's, 
 elected by themselves toi- lite. In this 
 way it woidd be i)ossible to make loom 
 for members fi-om the Colonies and 
 Dependenei's, jis well as from ihellonse 
 of (Jomnums and the various Colonial 
 pai'lianients. It would probably not 
 be too nnieh to provide; that the latter 
 parliamentary rei)iesentatives should 
 mak(; up one tifth of the Imperial 
 Senate, and that tlu'v should be nomi- 
 nated l)y tlie varit)us e.\ee\itives in 
 power from time to time in the differ- 
 ent parts of the Kmpire, or eleeted by 
 the Colonial Legislatures. In a Senate 
 of 500 members this would leave 400 to 
 represent the aristocracy of the United 
 Kingdom, the native princes of India, 
 and men who have attained distinction 
 in the ('olonies or Dependencies. In 
 the opinion of many people it woidd 
 be a great nusfoi'tuno if tin' utter 
 divorce of church from state were to 
 be consmnmated everywhere in the 
 British Empire, and therefore it would 
 only be wise to retiiin the rejiresenta- 
 tives of the Church in the Imperial 
 Senate. The projiortion of such in the 
 present House of Loi-ds is five per cent., 
 l)ut in order to provide for the repre- 
 sentation of other religious bodies be- 
 sides the Church of Kngland, it would 
 probably be necessai-y to increase t his 
 to ten p(>i' cent. Theic would thus 
 remain 'M) life nieuil)ers whose distri- 
 bution according to the peiceiitages 
 just suggested would be as follows :- 
 
 United Kingdon liOS 
 
 India 27 
 
 C'anada VA 
 
 Australasia 7 
 
 West Indies 4 
 
 British Africa 1 
 
 3G0 
 
 Under this scheme the number of 
 Hritish Life Peets entitled to sit in the 
 new Imperial S( nate would be reduced 
 by about one-third. It might be con- 
 venient to appoiti«»n the ;{0S life repre- 
 sentatives of the United Kingdom 
 according to population, and, in this 
 case, the Knglisli Peers would be called 
 upon to elect 22S, the Scotch IM and the 
 iri.-li l() mend)ers. These would con- 
 stitute the permanent nucleus of tlie 
 hnperial Parliament, and it would 
 seem that in such a reconstruction of 
 the House of Lords, in order to increase 
 its inllueuce and usefulness to tlie 
 whole I'hnpire, the rights of its pres«'nt 
 niendiers woiUd not be unnecessarily 
 uc um-easonably interfered with. As 
 regards the .'iO members from India it 
 would pi-obably be right to leave to the 
 huliaii (ioverniiient their selection 
 from among the native Princes, or Kng- 
 lishnu^n versed in Indian affairs ; the 
 actual appointment to be by the Crown. 
 In a simihir manner it might becouje 
 the duty of each Colonial (lovernnu'nt 
 to reconunend to Her Majesty's repre- 
 sentat iv(i men of position and character 
 in th(! Colonies as Life Senators, regard 
 being at the same time had, to the re- 
 presentation of the Provinces constitut- 
 ing a Colony. For instance those from 
 Canada might pei-haps be ilistributed 
 as follows :-- Fron> (Ontario, 5 ; Qjjebec. 
 5; Lower Provinces, 2; Northwest 
 Territoritjs and British Colund)ia, 1. 
 It seems unnecessai'y further to discuss 
 the details of the composition of the 
 proposed Imperial Senate or indicate 
 the manner in which the Christian 
 Chiu'ch might bcreiiresentedin it. Siich 
 paiticulars could readily be adjusted if 
 the main features of the schenu' wei'e 
 a|>proved. It will be sufficient to re- 
 capitulate here the i)roportions of the 
 l)roposed representation : — 
 I Life Members — 
 
 t 
 
 I 
 
 I i 
 
 , V 
 
70 
 
 KngliHli Vi'VVH 22K 
 
 Hrotcl) I'tM'iH :U 
 
 Irish I'eorH id 
 
 Senators from India -7 
 
 do ('aniula ... V-i 
 
 do AiistraliKsia . . 7 
 
 do British Africa . 1 
 
 do West Indies . . 4 
 
 Church nspresentatives. . . 10 
 
 4(K) 
 M(!nibers holding seats dui-iiiK the ex- 
 istence of the Parlimnents or Minis- 
 tries appointing them :— 
 From— 
 
 House of Connnons 80 
 
 India D 
 
 CJanada . • d 
 
 Australasia 3 
 
 West Indies 1 
 
 British Africa 1 
 
 100 
 
 Total members. . . . 500 
 Provision woidd possibly require to 
 be made for changing the composition 
 of this Highest Parliainent, from time 
 to tim(s just as variations took place in 
 the amounts of the contributions to the 
 Imperial Trea-sury. These contribu- 
 tion from the various Imperial Domin- 
 ions would increase in amount with 
 their population and wealth. They 
 woxild also increase wherever the local 
 customs duties on foreign imports were 
 lowered, and the more the expenditure 
 for local government was derived from 
 direct taxation. Higher protective 
 duties would tend to lessen ti'ade with 
 
 foreign countries, and decreas(> (h(^ 
 amount of revi-iuu! coli«'('te<l for Im- 
 perial pni'pos(!s. The Colonies would 
 thus iiave an inducement to .uloi)! a 
 free trade policy, because of the increas- 
 ed representation wliich a more exten- 
 sive trade with foicign nations, and 
 conseciuent increase of the lmp(>rial 
 contribution, would entitle them to. 
 
 By giving the Federal Senate the 
 control of Imperial concerns, the l''ng- 
 lish Hoiise of Conimons, at present 
 overburdened with work, would be 
 able to give thorough attention tothi; 
 alfairs of Great Britain, and the neces- 
 sity would be avoided for instituting 
 local parliaments within the United 
 Kingdom. 
 
 There is probably a great deal more 
 which might with great titiu-ss be 
 brought forward with reference to the 
 constittition of an Imperial Senate, i)ut 
 it seems unnecessary at present to fol- 
 low the subject further. Enough has 
 been sai<l to gain for the pi'esent pro- 
 posal some consideration on the i)art of 
 thought^'ul nu'n, and to induce them to 
 believe that the establishment of a 
 truly Imperial Parliament on the lines 
 here indicated is pei'fectly practicable. 
 There is every reason for anticipat- 
 ing that this Parliament of Parlia- 
 ments, the lineal descendant of the 
 Witenagemote of twelve centuries ago, 
 would in course of time, surpass the old 
 Roman Senate, and every reprc^senta- 
 tive assembly which the world htis yet 
 seen, in dignity, influence, stability and 
 power. 
 
 I 
 
71 
 
 CIIAITEU IX. 
 
 The Federal Executive; England's Hegemony. 
 
 In tiH> pi'occdini^ chnpter an attempt 
 has been made to set forth a plan of I'e- 
 pi'es(>ntatioii for the Empire, which, if 
 carried out, wcMild rivsiilt in transfoi-m- 
 ing tlie jiresent Kn^lish House of I^ords 
 into the hifj^hest liritish Parlianient or 
 Senate. Of course, this ])arliameiit, 
 although lepfislating for the whole Kni- 
 pire, (!ould not (•xer» 'se administrative 
 functions. FoUowinx the ordinary 
 constitutional method of the presi'ut 
 day an Imperial Ministry would have 
 to be created. This creation wouhl 
 necessai'iiy have to he the act of the 
 Sovei'eij^n, who is the visible soiuce of 
 all authority within the Empire. It 
 would probably involve the appoint- 
 ment of an lujperial first minister and 
 the formatifm of a Federal ministry 
 consisting of members of the recon- 
 structed House of Lords. This minis- 
 try would have the direction of Im- 
 perial alfairs and be entirely separate 
 from the Cabinet of the United King- 
 dom. From what has already been [ 
 written it is hoped that some idea has ! 
 beeji given of what the present writer 
 considers ought to be the spheie of Im- 
 ])erial legislation. Some reference now 
 becomes necessary to the ])robable 
 number and possible functions of the 
 Imj)ei'ial ministers. These would in all 
 lik<>lihood include a First Loi-d of the 
 Inipei'ial Treasury, a Lord High (Jhan- 
 
 cellor, a First Lord of the Admiralty, 
 and t lie Secretaries of State for Foreign 
 afTairs, the Colonies and India. 
 
 The duties of the first three of the 
 oHUials just named are, for our pur- 
 poses, indicated with sufficient preci- 
 sion in their tithes. The judicnal com- 
 mit ti'(^ of the House of Lords would, 
 after the reconstruction of the latter, 
 still ccmtinue to be the highest law 
 coui't of the lOmpire. F«)reign affairs 
 being federal affairs it follows that the 
 ambassadors and ccmsuls would be Im- 
 perial offlcei's. Commercial treaties 
 would alHo be under the control of the 
 foreign office in order that the interests 
 of the colonies and India, as well as of 
 Great Britain might be properly con- 
 sidered. At present certain politicians 
 in ('anada are disposed to manufacture 
 a grievance out of the circumstance 
 that the Dominion does iu)t possess the 
 treaty making power. This, as the 
 lamented founder of the League wrote, 
 is "making a demand which implies 
 disunion," and the l)est answer to it is 
 that such treaties should be negotiated 
 l<y the higlu^st Imperial authority, and 
 for the whole Hiitish Empire. 
 
 Among other important duties the 
 S((cretary of Stat(i for the (Colonies 
 would have to devise means for trans 
 ferring syst(!matically the superabund- 
 ant labour of English cities to the wild, 
 
f 
 
 « 
 
 
 72 
 
 ^ .; 
 
 uncKTiipM'd nnd untiUccl IuikIh of the 
 coloiiics. The iiiicinployrd thdUMniids 
 of the United KiiiKdoiii lu'rutofni-c uf- 
 custoiiH'd to work in inin«>Mand factor- 
 ies, at fuinaccs and foi-^fcs woidd IiaAc 
 to be >xi'aduaily trained to aKiiiuilur-e. 
 To turn those tliousunds adrift in back- 
 woods, <)!• on i)i'airieH, or to attempt to 
 enjploy them to advantage' <>n bush 
 farms or sheep runs, unprepared for 
 and ignorant of the circumstances of 
 the life before them fnupu'iitly rc-ults 
 in hanlsbip and disappointment all 
 round. Hitherto the colonies have been 
 Buttled by people who paid theii- way, 
 and were possessed of stout hearts and 
 '* willing strong right hands." At pi-e- 
 sent the unemployed djisses of tlu^ 
 mother country have neither thc^ 
 means nor the ability to become sett- 
 lers, and have not the metth* of the 
 men who hewed farms out of our 
 forests thirty and fifty years ago. In 
 deed, if this country were now to he 
 settled over again it is d()ul)tful whether 
 it possesses or coidd obtain tiie men and 
 muscle that did it before. For the un- 
 employed of the Empire, and in the in- 
 terest of every part of it, a system of 
 state aided emigration should be in- 
 augurated. Than this no more benefi- 
 cent legislation covild occupy the atten- 
 tion of an Imperial Senate and no 
 better field could be found foi- the ex- 
 ercise of the administrative al)ility of 
 a Federal Secretary of State. 
 
 In general terms it may be supposed 
 that the Federal Ministry would man- 
 age the Imperial linauces, administer 
 naval affairs and control colonial and 
 Indian relations, as well as the diploma- 
 tic and consular service. The Clabiuet 
 of the United Kingdom would continue 
 to have charge of the revenue from 
 customs (excepting always the proceeds 
 of the Imperial import duty), excise, in- 
 Qorae aud other direct taxes, post ofHce, 
 
 etc., and manage the English military 
 and VI >lunt< I'!' systems, I Iw civil service* 
 administration of Justice, |uil)lic works, 
 education, and all alfairH alfecting ex- 
 clusively t lie riiiled Kiiigiliim. 
 
 The sanu* const it ut innal relations 
 whiili now exist in all well gov<'rn('(l 
 states bet»ween t he sovereign, I he rxecu- 
 tive and the legislat ure would no doubt 
 be established betwixt the the various 
 parts of the Oovernnu^nt of the United 
 British Empire. The Ciown would 
 have the power of choosing oi' dismiss- 
 ing the Federal Ministi-rs; and the 
 latter of resigning or appealing to the 
 constittu'ncies in tlu' invent of their de- 
 feat in Parliament. In the ciuse of a 
 dissolution, however, only about one 
 llfth of the nuimbers of the Imptuial 
 Senate would have to seek re-election 
 at the hands of their ccmstituencies or 
 constituting bodies. The great ma- 
 jority, being life members, wiudd re- 
 tiu-n and be entitled to sit in tlu' next 
 parliament. This feature in the pro- 
 positi constitution of the Imjierial 
 Senates will no doubt appear objection- 
 able to many. Hut it nnist be remem- 
 bered that the present House of Lords 
 is not subject to dissolution, and that 
 stability is a feature essentially reipus- 
 ite in the parliament and government 
 of a great empire. Indeed, one of the 
 great drawbacks of the existing system 
 is that, owing to freciuent charges of 
 the party in power, a consistent foreign 
 antl colonial policy becomes impossible. 
 This was ot)served by Cobden long ago. 
 In writing to Combe hi' said : " With a 
 change ot government every six or 
 twelve months it is impossible that we 
 can have a continuous plan or a real 
 responsibility. Since 1 have been in 
 London 1 have heard scarcely a word 
 about the best mode of governing the 
 millions of India. The only talk is 
 about the chance of turning out one 
 
 fii 
 
-18 
 
 ministry and Itrinj^in^^ in nnotlu'i-." 
 Similar iM'niiirks niijs'lit with k''«'hI jus- 
 tice i)(« madf at tlu» prfsciit tinic. I''t»r 
 inslaM<'<N the f^iivcrnnicnt nftiu'diiy in 
 RnKl<tnd is wfll dispwj'd towards tlu' 
 colonics, and iiiis dune nultly in ciiiiinK 
 to^ftlirr tix' tirst Inipcrial Council, lait 
 who can he certain that these states- 
 mrn will not be sndderdy leplaced hy 
 others who may not cai-e to trouble 
 thtinjselvas abo\it ns ? A defeat of the 
 government in the House of (!onunons 
 on l{om(t llule, on a Licen. " Bill, or on 
 the liudget i'<^soluti(»ns, would cause 
 the removal from power of those states- 
 men who now HO satistmrtorily manaf^e 
 foreifjfu affaii's and those (tf India iind 
 other British possc^ssions. At present 
 the House of ('ommons does not do 
 justice to these, and indeed a debate 
 r<'><ardin)< them frecpiently finds its 
 benches empty. It is, further, rather 
 ciu'ious and surprising? to reflect that 
 the House of Connnons while I'Xercis- 
 ing its undoubted i'i<rht to tuin out an 
 Kn^lish Ministry when it thinks fit 
 may at the same time carry confusit)n 
 into colonial affairs. Federal ionists can- 
 not rest satisfied wliile sucli a statt; of 
 things exists. It should not be left in 
 the power of the eli'ctors of the Uniteil 
 Kingdom, when they choose to transfer 
 their confidence fiom tine political 
 party to another, to pi-oduce derange- 
 ment in the affairs of the colonies and 
 tlie Empire, and this can only be pre- 
 vented f)y completely separating the 
 management of the local affairs of the 
 United Kingdom from those of the 
 whole Empire, and by bringing into ex- 
 istence an Imperial I'arliament and 
 Government iidierently stable, and not 
 liable to be influenced by local political 
 conflicts in any pai-t of .he Empire. 
 
 lu this essay reference luis already 
 been mjwle to the H(jly Roman Empire 
 of German nations, as exemplifying to 
 
 a slight extent the natiye of the closj^r 
 union tn be established by lmp(>rial 
 I''ederation betwixt British nations 
 throughout the world. The example 
 does not affonl a just parallel, if only 
 those times ar'e considered when the 
 (ierman i<]nipir(> suffered so much 
 thi-ough its KouDinand Italian connec- 
 tions and entanglements. But if we 
 look back to the time when North and 
 South (iermany werelli-st united under 
 a common head, we find nmch to in- 
 str\ict and to guldens in oui efforts to- 
 wards Kederiition. 
 
 Welx'r, the historian, tells us that 
 Com-ad the Frank, tii-ed of his vain 
 efforts to control the turlndent nobles 
 of South (Jermany, and unable to pro- 
 tect his country from th(< im-oads of 
 the Ilimgarians, sent his brother Eber- 
 hard to Hemy of Saxony (the Fowler), 
 with his royal insignia and crown, 
 olfei-ing submission and friendship, and 
 expressing his conviction that the 
 futui'e of (jermany "lay with the 
 Saxons." Eberhard cari-ied the ines- 
 sagi', and to this day in Quedlinburg 
 the place is shewn where the Saxon 
 Duke received the Frankish nobles. 
 Henry, "a man full :)f (>nergy and old 
 {i(!rn)an simplicity," was then proclaim- 
 ed as king at Frit'/lar in Hesse, in !)1J), 
 by the secular and ec(;lesiastical princes 
 and loi'ds there assend)led. At thefli'st 
 he w;is ordy acknowledged i)y Saxony 
 and Franconia, but next year by his 
 brave, y and wisdom he succeeded in 
 causing the dukes of Swabia and 
 Bav.iria to become his vassals, and in- 
 duced them to content themselves with 
 the dtical dignity. Heiu'y refused 
 episcopal anointment, but called him- 
 self nevertheless "King, V)y the Giaco 
 of G(kI." He made use of his power 
 with great wisdom and moderation. 
 He did not wish to establish Imperial 
 rule by subjecting the various races, 
 
 f 
 
i^n 
 
 74 
 
 and countries to tho powor of a single 
 master anil govern tlie whole of (Jer- 
 niany from one central point, but "as 
 tlu! golden circlet of the crown unites 
 the shining jewels and transforms them 
 into tiie most glorious symbol of earth- 
 ly rule," so he intended that the 
 royal power shoxdd bind the Ger- 
 man dominions togethei-, without 
 destroying the characteristic activity 
 and life of the several peoples. His 
 conception of govcj'uing ran thus: 
 " Let each race stand by itself in its 
 own affairs and ride itself accoi'ding to 
 its old rights and usagt s ; let it be led 
 and guided in jieacc and war by its 
 duke, whom the counts and gentlemen 
 in the countiy, in time of war, are 
 bound 1o f)l]o\v and obey, Lt't him in 
 his parliasx'jit sii;le all disi)utes and 
 feuds in the land ; let the poor and op- 
 pressed find in him helpandpiotection; 
 let him defend the chui-ches, preserve 
 the public peace, and ])rotect t\H\ fron- 
 tiers against the invading eiiejuy. But 
 just as \ be dukes rule ove!- the several 
 race's in thti J'hnjjire, so the King stands 
 above and over all of them ; he is the 
 highest judge and leader of the whole 
 people, the final lefuge of the oppress- 
 ed, the highest protector of the church," 
 It was by the application of such prin- 
 cii)les that Henry avoided the rock 
 upon which his predecessor had vainly 
 expended his l)est energy and efforts in 
 ruling the Fath(>rland. 
 
 So long as Ilem-y's successors were 
 guided by his jirinciples and the sid)- 
 oi'dinate dukes and bishops were con- 
 tented with the jtowei's allotted them, 
 all weni well; fortune f.ivored the 
 (Ic ! 'nans, and sucli ep.)chs constituted 
 golden ages in the liistory of the Em- 
 pire. But when the just balance of 
 power was disturbed, and. by tiu'us. 
 imperial, ducal or ecclesiastical authori- 
 ty gained the predominance, conten- 
 
 tifius arose, wai-s prevailed, and Anally, 
 dm-ing a period of umisual violence, 
 the Imperial ship of state was wrecked 
 in the storm of the Thirty Years War. 
 The principles of fedeial government 
 propounded by Henry the Fowler, al- 
 though modelled on the feudal system, 
 were based on a just and wise founda- 
 tion, and have their application even 
 in the present day. Loyalty to these, 
 on the i)art of British comnmnities, is 
 still capable of building up happy and 
 prosperous nations and uniting them 
 into a powerful Empire. But, at the 
 prF lent moment, the principles in ques- 
 tion do not by any means meet with 
 general recognition in the various '.ri- 
 tish Dominions. In some of them the 
 churches are not content to jdace 
 themselves under the protection of the 
 local secidar authority, but rather seek 
 to rival and oppose it; and, further, the . 
 central p(^wer has been so lavish in con- 
 f(!ri'ing parliamentary powers and con- 
 stitutions on the growing colonies, 
 without exacting corresponding re- 
 sponsibilities, that some of the inhabit- 
 ants of the various Dominions of t\w 
 Empire have persuaded themselves that 
 they ai-e on the high road to indepjtul- 
 k^nce. Here and there we find short- 
 sighted minoj'ities who do not suffi- 
 ciently appreciate the advantages they 
 enjoy, and the favor's thi»y have receiv- 
 ed from an indulgent motherland. 
 There are shallow grundilers c^very 
 where; "Canada first" men and na- 
 ticmalists in Canada, "natives" in 
 Australia and Africanders in South 
 Africa, who dream of constructing in- 
 depeJident nations out of the fi'agments 
 of the British Enipiie. They do not 
 seem to have considered whether inde- 
 j)endent Canada could defend itself 
 against the Cnited States, republican 
 A>istralia against France, and tlif> 
 Afrikandei- Bond against the natives ot 
 
76 
 
 the dark continont or oven iijj:fiiiist 
 petty Portugal. Even in those pjirts of 
 the Empire wliieh contain no secession- 
 ist elenuMit some riglits ot llie sovi'ro- 
 ign authority have heen invaded, and 
 others are in danger of heconiing oh- 
 solete. But nevertheh\ss. and fortun- 
 ately the " golden circlet of the crown" 
 is still in existence to indicate the unity 
 of the Enii)ii"e, and no douht in the 
 past it has heen most etlicaceous in 
 pievtMiting disintegration. Ihit for it 
 iuul the virtues of its August Wearer, 
 the ctMitrifugal forces favoiu-ed hy 
 former Jiritish CJovjrnments might 
 have sent many a colony fiying off into 
 foi 'Mgn space. Let us he thankful that 
 there is yet time to countt'i-act an>- 
 ti idencv towards separation hy ])lac- 
 ing at the service of the Crown an 
 
 uperial Senate and Executive, and 
 u;t us p'ay that Her Majesty may lot>g 
 he spared to w<?ar the Imperial Crown 
 and enjoy the title approved at the 
 Colonial Conference, "Victoria, hy the 
 Grace of God, Qui'cn of the United 
 Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 
 and of its Colonies and Dei)endencie>i, 
 and Empress r.f India." 
 
 The tendency to consider only their 
 own interests, and to act independent- 
 ly of England, which has heen exhihit- 
 ed hy certain of her colonies, is a na- 
 tural fruit of the commercial independ- 
 ence which was foi-ced upon them at 
 the time when the Manchester School 
 of ji)oliticians held sway in the old 
 country. Ahout the time Nvhen t hoy 
 were thus sowing the si'eds of ]K)litical 
 tlisintegration, German statesmen were 
 at work Inulding up the Zoll\»'rein, t)te 
 history of whose development contains 
 a lesson of the greatest iuiportance to 
 us. There ar(> a few count ries in <iur 
 day hotter ahle to appreciate the hlesn- 
 ings of unity than Germany. No na- 
 tion can i)oint to such a golden age m 
 
 its history as that of the early German 
 Emperors, as well as that of the HoVy 
 Koman Empir(> under the Hohensta<i- 
 fen. No nation sulfered so hittorly 
 from its fall, and from strife, disunion 
 and dismemherment. during the Thirty 
 Years' War as did the (Jermans. N» 
 people felt so keenly their feehlono.-*;, 
 not only after the jioace of Westphalia, 
 hut after that of Vienna. None sti-ovo 
 so long, so honestly, and so modeiately 
 to he reunited. How their efforts were 
 crowned with success is matter of i-e- 
 cent history, as is also the i)rominent 
 part which Prussia performed in the 
 unification of the Fatherland. Indeed, 
 without her initiativi' the re-estal)lish- 
 ment of the German Empire woukl 
 have heen impossihle. This was ac- 
 knowledged hy the patriots of 1S48, 
 wlicn the (lerman Parliament olVered 
 the Imperial (!rown to King Federi<'k 
 William IV. But the strong will to 
 \\('ai' the crown, and the firm hand to 
 grasp the sceptre, were not then ready, 
 and at last the great (luestion wa.s 
 settled — "not hy speeches and the 
 resolves of tl > majority, hut hy hlood 
 and ir(;n." Siiovdd not the inhahitants 
 of the British En)pire he wise enough 
 hy this time to profit hy the teachings 
 of history ? That closer union which 
 had to he accomplished in Germany at 
 the cost of millions of men and money 
 is now within our reach hy the use of 
 the simplest arul nK)st heneficent 
 means. 
 
 Compared with what the (iermans 
 had to accomplish, the consolidation of 
 th(» Bi'itisli Empire seems any easy 
 task. But still, if we considei' the 
 means hy which tlie Union of tlie 
 Fatherland was accomplished, we shall 
 learn some very useful lessons. If we 
 incpnre as to the heginnings of Prussia '.s 
 great influence in (Jei-man affairs we 
 must go hack to the origin of the Zoll- 
 
7fi 
 
 vcrcin. lV(!vi<>iiK to 1h(! yciir 1S2S 
 ihcn^ were in (Jcrmiuiy as m;i?iy Ciis- 
 loiiis Ixiimdiiiy Iiii(%s as tlicic wcrti 
 liJiiitH I'or llic in<i('|»('iHltiit States corn- 
 po.siiiK tlii! (u'liiiaii liuiid. The first 
 Zollvcci^iii, or ("iisloiiis [.iiion, was iri- 
 stitulcd in t liut, year IxMwixt, I'nissia 
 aij(l Ht'Hso Dannstjult, and tlie (xovcrn- 
 incnt of Till' toniici' r((uiitry strove 
 (nci- alXi^i'uar-ds to incici.isn its iiicjn- 
 Ih'vh. Hi'ssc Joiiii'd in \Ki\, Havaria, 
 WiiitcinlH'iK, .Saxony, and 'I'lnir-in^ia 
 in l.Siti, Hadcn and Nassau in 1K{4, Uic 
 city of Frankfurt in IKH), and «''''<<lii!>lly 
 the Union gn^vv until it inrludod 
 twenty-seven million inlialiitants. 'l\u^ 
 States hcUonging to it eanie t,o l»e in a 
 sense dependent upon Pi ussia, whose; 
 fJovernnient strove to defend tlieir 
 tradin>^ and uianufacturing interests. 
 Gradually, politieal and national ob- 
 jects V)ocame common to the Zollverein 
 initil, from being mei-ely amaehini! for 
 the convenient collection and appor- 
 tionment of ri^venuc!, it grew to be; re- 
 garded as the symbol of (jierman unity. 
 The inllueniM' of this i)ond of union in 
 the n'construct ion of the (iernian I'an- 
 pire was immense, as is evident from 
 the fact that the great German State 
 of Austria. whi(di had to l)e excluded 
 from it, never formed part of the Zoll- 
 verein. 
 
 We thus learn two things from ihr. 
 (^xperifuice of (uirmany • First, tliat 
 the pr»;ponderatinginllurnceandact ion 
 of one member of the Jiund was iiec((s- 
 sary to elfecl the elosei- union ; second, 
 that between the institution of the hrst 
 weak political tie and the substitution 
 for It of the North (ierman Bund, and 
 aftcrwarils of the(Jerman I'hnpire, the 
 foiniation of a (.Uistoms Union inl(?r- 
 vened, whidi had the most impoitant 
 Influence in unit ing the (ji^i-man people. 
 At the same time, we must r(?n>end)ef 
 that, in our own case, instead xjf liaving 
 
 one meml)er of our F<]m|)ir(! ever int<'nt 
 on strengt liening the connertion, and 
 caring lor t he ((iimnf'i'cial int<'rests of 
 thr' others, we lia\( b.id. imtil a. com- 
 parativi'ly reeejit date, jtrominerit 
 statesmen advocating its disnicmbei'- 
 ment, and i)i'ominent economists of the 
 Gradgrind school abolishingdifferential 
 duties, Jind treat ing(<'i'laiii jiarts of the 
 Fmi)ire a»s utterly foi-eign to it, from a 
 commercial point of view. ffa]if)ily, it 
 is not too late to pioht by ('X()erierice, 
 and to insist that an Irrjperial ("om- 
 mercial Fnion nmst b«f establishcid, iui- 
 fore the present loose tie betwixt, the 
 Hrit ish possessions ean be cronvei-ted 
 into a firm /ind lasting bond of union. 
 
 There is but fnie comitry thai c:<n 
 take tluileadin the direction indicated, 
 and exercis<! a jiolitical and commeniial 
 l)ieponderanre, a hegemony, wit bin the 
 British Kmi)ii'e, namely, the United 
 Kingdom of Great Jiritain and Jrelnnd. 
 It is sui'ely lii^h tirni^ foi' English 
 statesmen to abandon their alt itude of 
 indifference, ado|)l a i)ositive policy, 
 and no longei' allow ii to be said that 
 the first move towardsclosei' union must 
 come from the ( 'oloni(!S. Such a posi- 
 tion is unworthy of the prc^stig*;, pow(;r 
 and wealth of lOngland ; who, if she 
 (iesires a flourishing and enduring Km- 
 pire, must take theleml in creatingand 
 maintaiiung it. 
 
 This view is su|)|)oi'ted and I he ojv 
 posite notion, (that the ( 'olonies should 
 make the first mo\i') is condemmtd in 
 an admirable let ter from (iener.il Tot- 
 t(;nham of Tasmania, published in 
 Inijtcruil Ffilertiiioii for I'^ebruary, 
 1889. The (ieneral's contentions are 
 these : -1'he offer- of a substantial share 
 of influence in shaping the fiweign 
 policy of the Fmpire must come Irom 
 \An' mother coimlry ; the lerpiest for 
 representation will nevei- be formally 
 made by t he colonies ; we. cannot afford 
 
77 
 
 he ()])- 
 
 llioiild 
 
 led in 
 
 11 T(.t- 
 
 •d in 
 
 I'liai-y, 
 
 ]s are, 
 
 Ishan* 
 
 •,!pi>?ti 
 
 li-oin 
 
 1st tor 
 
 linally 
 
 iiiVoi'd 
 
 any lonK<''" to <"<>nt(Mit oiu'hoIvch with I as hint) ni.'- at ii'conipcnsc. Addod to 
 inert a<linii"il ion of tli* "idcai"of Ini- tiiii-: is t lie. si iijxiidons advantage which 
 pci'ial I*\'dcrat ion. A caicrid survey of the Colonial Knipiic enjoys, ahsohitely 
 the situation in ('anada leads to fhciwithou*^ cost, in the proteetion of its 
 same concUisions. It is true that new sliippin^and shores against spoliation 
 hranehesof t lie licatcue are heiuf^ form- ! and a<^j<ressioii from every (piai-ter. 
 
 «>d hens hut those whic h have heen in 
 existence two or moi-e years show no 
 
 Still, to common c-alculatinK natures 
 and sound, soi'did husinesslike men 
 
 signs of steady proj<ress. The federa- | there is nothinj^in all this to cause 
 tionists admiration of his •■ideal' is not I tiicm to wish for any change. Thev 
 contagious, and his ent liusiasni has no | ;iie very cond'ortahle and contented 
 eff«'(;t upon those whos(^ mental vision audit is evident that from aniaterial 
 is only f)pen to the i)rospe(;t of mat«'rial point of vi«'w there exists no reason 
 advantage. It seems plain to sutdi why the colojiies should make the iirst 
 
 peo])le that, \mder the existing ai'- 
 rangements Imtwc^en (Jreat lii-itain and 
 lier ("oloines, tlu' lattej' have the hest 
 of the hargain, and thend'ore it is not 
 to their interest to di.-tm-h it hy mak- 
 ing any "recpiest for iej)resentation." 
 
 Why in these days of "l)uying in th(! 
 cheapest mai'ket," should common col- 
 onists desire any change? They are 
 proud to he loyal sid)jeets()f the (iueeii, 
 although they do not pay one cent of 
 the household exJ)ens(^s of llei- .Maj- 
 esty, or towards the annuities of thc^ 
 Royal Family. They enjoy the ad- 
 vantages of the diplomatic and con- 
 sular service as much as tlie inhabitants 
 of the Hi'itish Isles, and entirely with- 
 out cost. During the civil w in the 
 United States Canadians made al)uiid- 
 ant use of the good otTlces of the 
 Firitish F'Lnhassy at ^V'ashington, and 
 Canadian tourists in iOuiTt|)ean capitals 
 would, nodoul)t, in cases of difficulty 
 apply to Wv.v Majesty's representatives 
 there. It is also well known tliat in 
 negotiating tra<le licaties all the ex- 
 pensive macdiineiy of the Foreign 
 ()fl[h;e is placed at our disposal gratis. 
 Even the Hrilish parliamenf is occa- 
 sionally called upon to legislate for us. 
 and the Colonial otTlce sometimes inter- 
 ests itself in om- Ix half, all out of pine 
 generosity and without even so imich 
 
 move tow.ai'ds a closet political mnon 
 of tlie Kmpire, 
 
 Similar aiguments migld he 
 hiought up if the trade (|uest ion is con- 
 sidered. KvcMi in that resju-ct the col- 
 onics are advantageously placed .seeing 
 that the conti'ol of their tarilTs is in 
 theirown hands. Besides, pi-oposals for 
 closei- commercial intercourse connng 
 from any of the Coloni(!s could not 
 conuii.ind sulTicient attention else- 
 where. \Vhen .1 Hi'itish ("(Jinmercial 
 L'nion is broached in ('anad;i, the Hrst 
 remark invai'iably is "What would 
 Fngland say to such a thing." N(;xt 
 'h(^ question isasked, " Do you imagine 
 she will ever abandon I"'ree 'I'rade r' 
 Indeed n<t jnogress towards ;i Mritish 
 Zollverein is possible iirdess underthc! 
 initiat ive and leadership of the Mother 
 ('oun'.y. Ia'I her but first holdout her 
 iiand. and it will be at once ;nid fiiMuly 
 grasped by her daughter nations 
 throughout I he wnild. 
 
 One of the st longest arguments in 
 favor of such a<'t ion on (liep.nt of the 
 I'nited Kingilom i-^ the f.ul that no 
 
 olhei' pail o 
 
 f tlie l-;m| 
 
 )ire IS 
 
 •gaily 
 
 ca 
 
 pabl< 
 
 )f iiiangiiral ing legislation 
 
 looking towards Imperial I'mon. That 
 power is in the possession of tlie jiarlia- 
 
 meii 
 
 t of (ireat Hritaii 
 
 Then 
 
 IS 
 
 nothing to prevent thi' passage, at it8 
 
78 
 
 noxt session of a measure to secui'c the 
 permanent unity of tiie Empire if Eng- 
 lish legislators really had tlie wclfarv 
 at hcjul of the various British nations 
 throughout the world. TIk^ j)arliiiuient 
 of Great Britain has thi' legal right to 
 ai)ply the remedy for the presc'iit loose 
 state of things, since it possesses 
 supreme legislative authority and can 
 make laws for all tlie colonies and de- 
 pendencies. In this matter it would, 
 howciver, without doidtt, legislate, sub- 
 ject to the approval of the other par- 
 liaments and governments intei-ested. 
 Tlu! remedy has already l)een mention- 
 ed in this essay, but it deserves fre- 
 quent repetition. Let tlu; English 
 parliament h^vy an Impei-ial ml niluniii 
 duty on all alien goods ari-iving in any 
 and ivery Bi'itish port overand above 
 tlu^ diiferent local tariffs there in force. 
 Let the proceeds of this particular duty 
 collected in England, be kept separate 
 from her other revenues and applied 
 only for naval defence and Tmi)erial 
 purposes. Let her r'e(|uire that the 
 same proceeds in British possessions 
 beyond the sea be remitted to the Gov- 
 ernment at honus and devoted <o the 
 same purpose. Let it also be enacted 
 that any pai't of the Empire declining 
 to agree to this arrangement should 
 have its products treated exactly like 
 those from foreign countries, and sub- 
 jected to the payment of the Imperial 
 duty. There cannot bi> a ny doubt as to 
 the maimer in which this action woidd 
 be received by the well disposed Col- 
 onies and the Crown dependencies. 
 They would Ik; only too willing to c on- 
 tribute in t his way to Imperial defence, 
 and obtain at this price a preference in 
 the markets of (Jreat Britain. A simi- 
 lar preference would await the manu- 
 factures ot the motlui count ly in 
 India and the colonies, while foreign 
 nations seeking these markets would 
 
 be obliged to pay for admission and 
 thus contribute to the Imperial de- 
 fence fvmd. 
 
 What would be t he i)osi';ion of any 
 colony which might refuse to comply 
 with England's requirements? It would 
 not cease to l)e part of the Empire, and 
 would, no doubt, continue to enjoy 
 gratuitously the sanie measui-e of pro- 
 tection which England so generously 
 at1"()rds it at i)re.sent. But its products 
 woidd be subject to the extra Imperial 
 duty when sent to England, while 
 similar goods from the loyal colonies 
 would be free from this tax. In course 
 of time the obntrejiercms colony would 
 find its t;ircinnstances quite intolerable, 
 and no doubt be glad to improve them 
 i)y accept lug the projxtsal of England 
 and making its conti-ibut/ion like the 
 rest of the Empire. 
 
 The practicability of this plan is un- 
 dcnibttd. It may be carried out by 
 England at any moraent, so great is the 
 l)ower she wields by reason of ner 
 enormous trade. Eve;'ything depends 
 on her willingness to vise this power 
 for ihe purpose of scciu-ing Imperial 
 unity, procuring an Imperial defence 
 fund, and incidentally (encouraging her 
 b.oaie and colonial trade. Alison ex- 
 presses hi nisf^lf as follows wiih regard 
 to the importance of the latter as com- 
 pared with foreign trade :— " These 
 facts illustrate the important, and to a 
 connnercial state vital distinction be- 
 tween the foreign and colonial trade as 
 they alfect the market for manufac- 
 tures and the means of national 
 security. It may safely be affirmed 
 that, on a «lueand gcueial appreciation 
 of this distinction, the existeiu'e of the 
 British Empire in futuie times will in 
 all probability depend. Inexperience luus 
 now abundantly provt'd that, even as a 
 trading and manufacturing state, we 
 are dependent on our colonies, if not 
 
79 
 
 fortho largest, for tho most growing 
 part of o\ir exjiorts. and that it is in 
 these that both tlic most eventually 
 important and enduring market tor our 
 domestic industry is to be found." 
 
 A study of this subject for the last 
 six years has convinced the present 
 writer that there is no other way in 
 which a revenue for Imperial defence 
 can be so i-eadily obtained as the one 
 above outlined. Nor is there any 
 better plan for securing the permanent 
 and willing adhesion of the colonies to 
 the Kmpire. All that is necessary is 
 prompt action on the part of l<]t\gl.nid. 
 To borrow a simile from the game of 
 whist — she has the game in hei' own 
 hands, but, to win it, she nnist lead 
 trump. 
 
 The end has now been reached of the 
 argument in favor of the j)lan of im- 
 perial P^ederation laid down in ('hai)ter 
 I of tliis essay under the letters A B 
 and ('. As far as possible this plan has 
 been elaborated and details given in 
 the subsespient chapters although such 
 a ])roceeding is not looked upon with 
 favo r by our fellow federationists. It 
 is, however, gi-aiifying to find that 
 that distinguished .idvocate of the 
 ca\ise, the Ri-v. Principal Ciraiit of 
 Queen's ('ollege Kingston }■ >s also felt 
 himself obliged to desceiul to ^"partic- 
 ulars. Although in Ms earlier efforts 
 he disapi)roved of ])utting 1 )rwardany 
 definite jilan fortheact 'ie»)lishni"nt of 
 our object; yet, in his last lecture de- 
 livered in Toronto he formulates certain 
 proposals which, when examined, will be 
 found to approach ([uite closely lothe 
 scheme which has been propounded in 
 this essay, and stated more concisely 
 under the letters A. B and (' of its first 
 chaptei". Principal (iiant's ])roposals 
 are as follows :— " Let xis, at any rate, 
 <lo what Austi-alia has done- enter into 
 a treaty, according to which we shall 
 
 pay so much a year for a certain num- 
 ber of ships, to l)e on our coasts in 
 })eace. and in war at the disposal of the 
 Kiiipire. That woul.l be tantamount to 
 saying: 'Von have sliared our risks, 
 we will share yours ; we will pay part 
 of the insurance that is neces.-»aiy to 
 guarantf'e peace; we are educating 
 otHcers for the army, and we are will- 
 ing to give a much needed addition to 
 the fleet.' That would be a first step 
 towards the attainment of full citizen- 
 ship. What would be the next 'i W'e 
 could ask that oui' voice should be 
 lu'ard in some constitut ional way be- 
 fore any war was decided on, and we 
 woidd have the I'ight standing groiuid 
 fi'om which to urge a wise system of 
 preferential trade in the common inter- 
 est. These three things ai-e in my 
 o])inion connected, and I have ventured 
 to indicate the order in which they 
 should be taken." These three steps 
 are the same in essence, as my A IJ 
 of Impei'ial Federation. But they ar(> 
 placed in a different order, and Prin- 
 (•i]>al (iiant's third point is included in 
 the pi'o])osal A, wiiicn accom])lishes 
 two thiTigs at one strcjki' ; i. e. provides 
 an Imperial revenue and estaltlishes 
 pret'erenti.il trade-. The following stcate- 
 ni"nt conipai'cs the two jjlans:-- 
 Pi'incipal (ii'ant proposes : 
 
 1. To ])ro\ide an auxiliary fleet. 
 
 2. That I lie colonies should have a 
 const it lit ional voic(> as to peace oi' war. 
 
 3. 'I'bat a wise system of pieferential 
 trade should be urged. 
 
 CorrespoiH^ing ,o these ari^ the pro- 
 ])osals |)ut forward in this essay, if 
 ))laced in the following older : 
 
 B. To contj'ibnte to itie cost of the 
 pi-esent n;!\ n'. 
 
 C. That the colonies should be repre- 
 sented in an Impei-ial .Senate. 
 
 A. That an Imperial revenu< duty 
 be levied on foi'eign impoits. 
 
 r 
 
80 
 
 I shall not mlvaneo any additional 
 ai'fifiunents to show that, in first adopt- 
 ing and workitif? for tho, step doHiicd 
 und(!r A, Imperial Ffdcnitionists are 
 "putting their best foot foremost." 
 But I shall allow the editor of " Im- 
 perial Federation" to speak, who in 
 September, ISS7, penned the following 
 noteworthy passage on this point : — 
 " We freely assent to the proposition 
 that the colonies ought to be represent- 
 ed in the councils of the P^mpire, but 
 this, though true, is not the whole 
 truth. T\w shadow of representation 
 is useless without substantial identity 
 of interests among the people rei)resent- 
 ed. Take the most obvious case of a 
 question of })eace or wi\r. Would it be 
 any consolation to \'ictor'ia or Canada, 
 
 when their territc tries were invaded, 
 to have been represented at the Coun- 
 cil which decidi'd ujjon war, if their 
 own representatives had dissented, and 
 the vote had been carried against them 
 by a majority ? Upon such tpiestions, 
 something more than a majority, 
 ' something more nearly approaching a 
 imaninious decision is recjuisite. But 
 this xinanimity can only be obtahied 
 when a whole nation, or every part of 
 a scattered Empire, has the same inter- 
 ests at stake, and ap{K)ints their repi-e- 
 sentatives in the same spirit. This 
 is the reason why ice aim first 
 at i(h'}itiJivatioii of interests, ttad 
 secomtarily <it eovstitittiirtinl readjust- 
 nienf." 
 
 ("IIAPTEU X. 
 
 An Anglo-Saxon Common Wealth ; Conclusion. 
 
 It is not an uncomnum occurreiu-e, 
 when Imperial Federation is (he sub- 
 ject of discussion in Canada, to hear 
 the view expressed that the true object 
 to strive foi- is not Imperialism, but the 
 \uuon of all English-speaking y e..>p;es, 
 and it is frequently urged that the lirst 
 step to the establishment of such a 
 Greater Britain would be the union of 
 Canada with the American Kepid)lic. 
 Thosv: whf) entertain this view atted to 
 believe that such a first step would ul- 
 
 timately lead to a union with the self- 
 governing nations of th<^ British Em- 
 pire, and the formation of an Anglo- 
 Saxon Conunonwealth. so populous, 
 wealthy and powerful as lo be without 
 a rival in the world. This line of argu- 
 ment is usually adopted by those who 
 arc inclined to indulge in (pierulous op- 
 position to I be present Canadian Ciov- 
 ernment, and who have had opportuni- 
 ties of mingling \\ ith an<l appreciating 
 the excellent qualities of many of the 
 
81 
 
 citizens of the Uniti'd States. 
 
 Ttie nearest iippi-oiuh to an expres- 
 sion, in print, of the idea entertained 
 by this class is given l)y Px-ofessor Gold- 
 win Smith in his recent Ijook "('anada 
 and the ('anadiau (jnestion." At pa^e 
 265 he says, "There is a federation 
 which is feasible, and, to tliose who do 
 not measure grandeur by physical force 
 or extension, at least as grand as that 
 of which the Imperialist dreaujs. It is 
 the moral federation of the whole Eng- 
 lish speaking race throughout the 
 world, including all thos<! millions of 
 men speaking the English languagt^ 
 in the United States, and parteol from 
 the rest only a century ago by a wretch- 
 ed quari-el, whom Imperial F'ederation 
 would leave out of its pale. Nothing is 
 needed to bring this about but the vol- 
 untary retirement of England as a 
 political power fr<nn a shadowy domin- 
 icni in a sphere which is not hers. 
 There is no apparent r(»ason why, 
 among all the States of our race, there 
 should not be community of citizenship, 
 so that a citizen of any one of the na- 
 tions might take up the rights of a 
 citizen in any one of the others at once 
 iipon his change of domicile, and with- 
 out the pi'ocess of naturalisation. This 
 would be political union of no incon- 
 siderable kind without diplomatic 
 lial)ilities, or the strain, which surely 
 no one can think free from peril, of 
 political centralisation." 
 
 It v.ill probably oocm- to some reatl- 
 ers of this passage that " Imperialists " 
 are n(»t the only dreamers, and that 
 the feAsihle federation here spoken of is 
 of a nnu h U'ore I'theieai nature than 
 that which the Professor h»us been pleas- 
 ed t«)call the "airy fabric of Imperial 
 Federation." but it would be imgrate- 
 ful to criticise too closely such ;: niagni- 
 llcent ideal, and the present writer is 
 {inxious to accept it as the ultimate 
 
 goal of those who ari', at present 
 striving only for the permanent unity 
 of the British Empire, and do not con- 
 sider that a still wider federation may 
 now be mooted with advantage. It is 
 in regard to the practical measures pro- 
 posed for bringing about his "moral 
 federation," that we aie disposed to 
 differ froni Oi"- Smith. It is manifestly 
 inconsist^uit on his part to suggest, as 
 the first step towards the formation «f 
 an Anglo-Saxon Union, the disruption 
 of the British Empire, for that is what 
 the i)olicy of Connnercial Union which 
 he advocates really means. If the pro- 
 fessor is really sincere in his wish foi' 
 the realisation of his ideal, and at all 
 anxious about his reputation as a prac- 
 tical statesman, he ought to see the 
 wisdom of leaving the British Empire 
 in its present integrity, and of advocat- 
 ing the absorption into it of the United 
 States. 
 
 Noi- woidd this action on his part be 
 otherwise;than sensible in the highest 
 degree, "There is no apparent reason" 
 why all the States of t)iu' race should 
 not be amalgamated luuler a conuuon 
 sovereign. There is nothing to jn-event 
 the United States from applying for 
 admission into a consolidated British 
 Empire such as will, no doubt, be estab- 
 lished in the near future. Suppcjsing 
 that this consolidation should be effect- 
 ed by the adoption of the measvn-es ad- 
 vocated in this essay, it wovdd be pos- 
 sible for the United Stat«s to join the 
 British Empire without giving up the 
 policy of protecti(»n which, in the opin- 
 ion of tho majority of their citizens, 
 has contributed so nuah to their pros- 
 perity and greatness. To contribute 
 five per cent, on the value of their im- 
 ports from coiuitries outside of the 
 Anglo-Saxon Commonwealtb would be 
 but a triding price to pay U>v imnumity 
 from attack by foreign fleets, This 
 
iminmiity they could securo by hfcom- 
 iiifjf part of a roconstructcd British Em- 
 pire, and the enormous expenditure 
 which they are now (•(mtemi)lntinK *'<»• 
 a fleet and coast ilefenees would he 
 saved. MoreovM'r, the United States 
 coiUd secure representati(jn in the Im- 
 perial Senate, although that would he 
 comparatively small on account of the 
 high duties they levy on foreign im- 
 ]?ortations. Hn.ving secured this Im- 
 perial representation, they could prob- 
 ably dispense with their state govern- 
 ments and legislatures and thus etfect 
 another enormous saving. All this will, 
 of course, appear highly absurd to the 
 professor and his school, but it is sober- 
 ly maintained to be fifty times more 
 reasonable than the plan the professor 
 suggests for arriving at his " moral 
 federation." As well might he propose 
 to begin the construction of a railway 
 to the moon by sinking through the 
 centrt^ of the earth as think of estab- 
 lishing an Anglo-Snxrm Common- 
 wealth by first disnuunbering the Bri- 
 tish Empire. 
 
 It will, of course, be maintained by 
 Commercial Unionists that no such 
 dismemberment is intended ; that all 
 they are striving for is the establish- 
 ment of closer trade relations between 
 United States and Canada. If so, then 
 they will have to admit that the Ameri- 
 cans are now conuuitting the same 
 mistake which Dr. Smith tells us they 
 made a hundred yeai-s ago in driving 
 the U. E. Loyalists fnim their homes. 
 They refuse even to discuss terms of 
 reciprocal trading, in order to force 
 Canadians into ])()litical imion with 
 them, and they ai-range the terms of 
 their tariff evidently with the same ob- 
 ject in view. It would scarcely be cor- 
 rect to say that the McKinley Bill was 
 invented mainly for the purpose of in- 
 juring C'auadian commercial interests. 
 
 but, in point of fact and owing to her 
 situation, Caiuida will pi-objibly feel its 
 effects nioie than any other coyintry. 
 Many pcM'sons here i-cgard it as the 
 culmination of a long coui'se of »m- 
 friendly legislation and action, the ob- 
 ject of which is to induce Canada to 
 luiite lier fortunes with thos(» of the 
 United States. The Elgin Treaty of 
 1854, according to which the products 
 of mines, forests and fisheries passed 
 freely betwixt the two coimtries, was 
 abrogated by the United States in 18f«t, 
 because they thought that Canada had 
 not been sufllciently friendly to the 
 north during the civil war. Since that 
 tiuie the overtures wnich have been 
 made bv Canada to obtain some kind 
 of reci})rocity have been almost con- 
 tinuous. In October 1887, a letter ap- 
 peared in the New York Ti nies tvoin its 
 Washington correspondent, describing 
 the i-esult of these applications in the 
 following terms : "Canada was anxious 
 to continue the reciprocity, and was 
 willing to offer very consideraT)le in- 
 ducements tothateiul, but it would not 
 pay the price of a change t)f flag. 
 Canadian commissioners came here and 
 talked with Secretary Seward and the 
 leading men at both ends of the Capitol. 
 Mr. Morrill, of Vermont, now a Sena- 
 tor, was diairman of the Ways and 
 Means Committee of the House. He 
 said to the Canadians : ' If you want 
 these commercial priveleges that you 
 talk about, take your seat by the side 
 of lis and vote for them.' Mr. Banks 
 went further. In the first session of 
 the Thirty-ninth Congress, he intro- 
 duced a bill for the admission into the 
 Union of the States of Nova Scotia, 
 New Brunswick and Upper and Lower 
 Canada. The Canadians went home 
 convinced that nothing coidd be obtain- 
 ed from this country unless they 
 abandoned England." 
 
Tn llicsi" efforts to obtiiin reciprocity 
 the leadcirK of liotli jiolitical pai'lies iu 
 the DoininioM stooil on the same pint - 
 form, and none of tht'in clivanieil of 
 di.scriniinatiiiK against the .Mother 
 Country. In 187 J, the lieforui or 
 Liberal Govcniuient sent the Hon. 
 •' eor^je Hrown to Washin^^ton to neK<»- 
 tiat.) a treaty, and ont; was framed 
 wiiich, liowovur, the U. S. Senate re- 
 fns»'d to ratify. This treaty had in- 
 chided natural products and certain 
 lines of manufactures, the latter how- 
 ever heiuK added on the distinct imder- 
 standiuK that the same products from 
 England would alh le admitted free 
 into Canada. Since i lien the (Janadian 
 liberal party has changed its political 
 platform, and now advocates measures 
 which seriously menace the unity of 
 the Empire. But all the elforts of 
 liberals and Commercial Unionists seem 
 to be lost on the American politicians, 
 the majority of whom expect direct 
 unconditional surrender from Canada, 
 and sooner or later, its political absorp- 
 tion into the United States. 
 
 All this proves that Dr. Smith begins 
 at the wrong end when he seeks to form 
 a feasible federation, a moral common- 
 wealth of English-speaking peoples by 
 advocating Commercial Union, what- 
 ever that may be. The Americans will 
 have none of it unless as a step t(j com- 
 plete political absorption, and they are 
 honest enough to say that the latter is 
 what they wish and expect. Eiulhei- 
 more, there is not the slightest ground 
 for supposing that, if the whole of North 
 America were imited under the Repub- 
 lic, there would be any desire for 
 Anglo-Saxon Confederation. The Uni- 
 ted States would be, even more 
 then than at present, the rival of the 
 British Empire and very far from be- 
 ing its friend or its ally. In the past 
 the sympathies of the Americans have 
 
 been exhibited for the enemies of Kng- 
 land on ev«'ry oca.sion of peril to the 
 Empire, and it is not likely that in- 
 crease of their tei-rit^ory and popula- 
 tion would etfect a change in their 
 traditional policy.. 
 
 During the pjust few months, and 
 while the foregoing chapters were be- 
 ing written, events have transpired 
 which have directed the public atttMi- 
 tion more closely than ever be- 
 fore to the future of the I'^mpire, 
 and proved the necessity of taking 
 measures to secure its perman- 
 ent unity. Tiefore concluditig this 
 es.say it may be well to bring the his- 
 tory of the fcideration movement up to 
 date and to make some refer«ince to the 
 occurencas in question and to the pre- 
 sent sit,uation. 
 
 In spite of the refusal contained in 
 Lord Salisbury's letter of July, 1880, 
 the Imperial Federation League ha.s, 
 for the space of nearly two j'^ears' enter- 
 tained the plan of influencing the Eng- 
 lish Government tc call a second Con- 
 ference of Colonial delegates for the 
 purpose of evolving a scheme for the 
 future management of Imperial affairs. 
 To strengthen its position it endeavor- 
 ed to influence the Leagues in the Col- 
 onies toagitatefor the calling together 
 of such Conferences periodically, and 
 making them part of the governing 
 machincuy of the Empire. On the first 
 consideration of this matter the Coun- 
 cil of the League in Canada adopted 
 unanimously the following resolution : 
 "That in view of Lord Salisbury's de- 
 claration that his goverment will be 
 happy to receive and to consider any 
 suggestions which the League desires 
 to make for the purpose of modifying 
 the relations betwixt Great Britain and 
 its Colonies, this Ct)uncil is of opinion 
 that a meeting <>f delegates from the 
 various branche.- jf the League should 
 
84 
 
 be calhul by the pairiit liCiifjfiU' <o do- 
 (•i(l<> tijion what siigK'''^<i<"i^ shouldbi- 
 made foi- thr considi'i-ation of Her 
 Miijcsty's ({ovcriunctit with a view to 
 to the callinj^ of a .second ( 'olonial Con- 
 fenrncc." This roHoliiMon was ciiibodi- 
 cd in an excellent explanatory letter 
 by i\Ir. Castell Ifopkins, Hon. Secretary 
 of the heaKwe in Canada on the I'ith 
 Nov(Mnber. IKX), and sent to London 
 bnt evident lydid not give satisfaction at 
 bea(l(iuarter>s. Fn conse(jnenc,e of repre- 
 s(Mitat ions from thence, the ('otmcil of 
 tho Leagne in ('anada passed another 
 resolution, on the l(»th I)e(!eniber, to 
 tlie following effect :-"Th(! resolution 
 proposed by Sir Frederick Weld upon 
 the resolution passed at the last meet- 
 ing of tills C'ouncil having been con- 
 sidered by this Council, it is re.S'olved 
 that, regard being had to the ditTicul 
 ties deemed insurmountable by the 
 Executive Coimcil of the Parent League 
 of holding a convention of delegates, 
 that the resolutinn passed at the sug- 
 gestion of Lord f'osebery for the estab- 
 lishment of Imperial Conferences be 
 and the same is hereby approved. But 
 this Council would regret that any con- 
 ference should be held at which the 
 question of inter-Imperial and ('olonial 
 trade would not be deemed a subject of 
 first-class importance." 
 
 Although its policy wfis thus endors- 
 ed by the League in Canada, the 
 League at home took no further steps 
 to carry it into effect, in consequence, 
 it is said, of the impossibility of getting 
 Australiffti stjitesmen to attend any 
 conference in London while proceed- 
 ings were being taken to fedei-ate the 
 colonies of the South Pacific. But time 
 and tide wait neither for man nor 
 league, and tlie course of other events 
 promises to lead to the consolidation of 
 the Empire in a manner altogether in- 
 dependent of the plans of orthodox 
 
 impei-ial federat ionisis, oi- in such a 
 way as to force them to action. 
 
 The first of thes<' events was the pas- 
 sage by the IT. H. Congress in Septem- 
 ber 1 MX), of the McKinley Tarilf Hill. 
 Althougli, in th(* following Novemi)er 
 (Sections, the people may be said to 
 havi^ disai)i)roved of stuh extremely 
 protective legislation, there is no do\il)t 
 that both political pnrties in the United 
 States are solenndy pledged to the 
 principb^ of jji'otection to Amei-ican in- 
 dustries. Mr. McKiidey liimself al- 
 though he failed of relection still sup- 
 ])orts the snnie policy, which may he 
 said to be that of tlie l{epui)lican party, 
 and quite recently expressed himself 
 regarding it as follows : 
 
 "We mustjirotect ourselves iigainst 
 the people of other coimtries. This is 
 according to tiie dictates of patriotism 
 and the doctrine of the protective 
 tariff. The foreigner cannot i)e reach- 
 ed by your tax gatlierer. Why slicadd 
 we not make him pay for the privileg«f 
 I of coming? He iias nothing in conunon 
 witli us. Wiiy should we not 
 stop iiim at our (Justom House? 
 I tell you that we will never open our 
 markets to the products of European 
 laliour until the foreigners level up the 
 condition of their labour to ours. Then 
 we Avill meet them in the neutral 
 markets of the world— tlien, and never 
 till then. Why should we give up 
 these markets to foreigners ? They are 
 the best under tlie shining sun. We 
 consumer more than any other (12,(K)0,(XX) 
 people on the face of the globe. We 
 buy more because we have more of the 
 wherewithal to buy tlian others. 
 We have nore of the wherewithal 
 to buy than others because our 
 conditions give the rewards of trade 
 to the laborer. Old men may be 
 free traders, but in God's name let no 
 young man, who has hi?- career to 
 
85 
 
 make, espouse Mie cause of H rev- 
 etuie taiill". We liave in t liis ( (»\uit ry 
 (ivt! per cent. vH tlie pt)i)ula) inn nl' llie 
 earth, and yet wo ci^ii.sunie twenty per 
 cent, of the sugar, thiity |»ei' cent, of 
 tliecollee, thirty-live per cent, of tlie 
 cotton, forty perci-nt. of tluM-oal. and 
 lifty per cent, of tiie tin. And we iu"e 
 jifoing to niaivu our own tin pails, too." 
 Not only does Mr. McKinley thus 
 plaiidy avow the ohject of his hill, hut 
 Mr. Andrew ('arncKie, in his article 
 concerning it, puhlislied in the Xinr- 
 ff'cntli Vvitturji for .June last, explains, 
 with*'hrutul frankness," that its pro- 
 visions wei(^ framed I'or the purpose of 
 l)reak.ing down the Colonial ilillerenl Lai 
 duties of sucli countries as Spain, atul 
 in ord(ir so gain the advantage ov<m' 
 England in her foreign markets. (Jne 
 of its soctit)nK provides for 1 he payment 
 of a drawh.'ick on the exportation of 
 articles mannfactin-ed or producr-d in 
 the United States, e(pial in amount to 
 the duties on the imported materials 
 which have hoen used in their mami- 
 facturt^ and anothei- section, the re- 
 ciprocity clause, empowtu's the Prc^si- 
 dent to suspend the provisions of the 
 McKinley Act regarding the free intro- 
 duction of sugar, molasses, cotriu", tea, 
 and hides into the Unitcnl States, as re- 
 gards any country whose government 
 imposes duties on the agricultiual (ti- 
 other products of thi' United St,a.t-es. 
 Mr. Carnegie claims that alr(;a(ly a 
 favorahle treaty has heen negotiated 
 with Brazil and that Spain has heen 
 ohliged to change her Colonial trade 
 policy. "Hereafter" sjiys Mr. Carnegie 
 "not a harrel (of floiir) can come frouj 
 the parent land. Spain up to this time 
 had not learned from Britain how a 
 fond mother, viore fond than ivlsc jjcr- 
 hapii, could favor her children, and pro- 
 tect her colonies not for her own, hut 
 for their welfaie, ujotherlike, demand- 
 
 ing in return. . . . Cnha will here- 
 after he of as little g<pod to Spain a.s 
 Canada is to liritain : nay, mav and 
 pi(ii)ahly will l)ccome th.i source of 
 serious troui)le and ilangcr to .Spain, 
 without the i>rohal)ilil y of hcing any 
 good to lu-r : and, again, I may add, as 
 Canatla is and prohahly will Itecome to 
 Ihitain." 
 
 XiitJiwithslanding such plain dedara- 
 tiiins of conuni-rcial war hy the United 
 States, it does not appear that the 
 people of Kngland have fully realised 
 the dangerous chaiacli-r of the ,Mc- 
 llinley Hill. Another of its prominent 
 features is the great increase in the 
 duty upon tinplates, the e\ident ohject 
 of which is to start the manufacture of 
 these in the United States. This is one 
 of the few manufactui'ing iuihist ries in 
 which (iri-at Hrilain still maintains her 
 pre-eniinence. In Septend)er, IHDt), the 
 Iron and St(;el Institute of (Jreat IJri- 
 tain was formally greeted in New ^'ork 
 with hearty words of welcome hy the 
 same Mr. Carnegie ahove n^ferred to, 
 and among the meinhi'rs were not a few 
 tinplate manufacturers, whose "curses 
 not loud hut deep" no douht formed 
 auapproi»riateruimingaccompaniment 
 to .Mr. Carnegieshigh sounding perioils. 
 It was my i)rivileg(^ to, listen to the 
 opinions of some of the men of She- 
 tlicld and (Unnherland and (Jlasgow 
 while comparing American and Ung- 
 lisli methoils, manufacturing and fin- 
 ance on the way from Niagara to Mon- 
 treal. Many of them, indeed, seemed 
 to have made up their minds that somi; 
 change in the character of England's 
 fiscal policy was necessary, hut not a 
 trace of this feeling was visible in any 
 of the ollicial speeches at the nu'ctings 
 of the Institute. In these no mention 
 is to he found of the follies of protec- 
 tion, no hint of the enormities of the 
 McKinley Act. The speakers frou\ 
 
IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 "^- IIIM ilM 
 
 ■ 0° 1 2.0 
 
 i 1.8 
 
 
 1.25 1.4 
 
 1.6 
 
 
 ^ 6" - 
 
 
 
 ► 
 
 V} 
 
 m. 
 
 ■Hi 
 
 
 /, 
 
 7 
 
 /^ 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sdences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 ^% 
 
 ,\ 
 
 #> 
 
 V 
 
 \\ 
 
 ^<b 
 
 V 
 
 4> '\ 
 
 fi- 
 
 ^.. ^^ 
 
 O^ 
 
 4^ 
 
 » 
 
 % 
 
 ^^ 
 
 ''9,^ 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY. I4S80 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
 

m 
 
 Kii^lond wt'vo of the cliariictri' thai lh«' 
 Anu'ricans call "(louj^lifaci's," and the 
 pr«>siil(>nt, iSir Jaiiirs Kitsoii, .spoke of 
 "winding? the silkmi chains of coiii- 
 incrcc round tlic woi'ld,'"as if tluil were 
 Ihcciiicf end and aim of thccomnifr- 
 ciai policy of tl\(' (Jrcat Kcpiihlic. Its 
 citi/cns c«)uld not possihiy lias c enjoy- 
 ed a belt cr sjH'cinu'n than this of the 
 sort of eloqnjMice which they ai-e ac- 
 custonu'd to cliaracterise as "bunk- 
 urn." 
 
 Thes«'cond event of conscMpience took 
 place in Fehuai-y of this year when the 
 Dominion Parliament was disolved, 
 and the political issu<> placed stpiarely 
 before the electoi's of the conn! ry by 
 Sir John Macdonald in these wor<is: 
 "The (pK^stion which you will shortly 
 be called upon t«) determine i-esolves it- 
 si'lf into this shnil we endanger our 
 possession of this j^reat heriJage be- 
 (pieathed to us by our fathers and sub- 
 mit oursi'Ives to direct taxation for tlie 
 privilege of having our tariff lixed at 
 Washington, with the pro.spect of 
 ultimat«>ly becomin}^ a portion of t1ie 
 American I'nion." The gravity of tlie 
 crisis was everywhere rec<i;j;nised, and 
 especially in the Mother Count ly. The 
 orj^an of the licague ejiiiu'stly hoped 
 for the success of the Conservatives 
 and declared that '"we must bestiioui'- 
 selves here at hoiue and there in 
 Canada, and take car«> that, so far as 
 lies in out" power, means m.-iy be de- 
 vised to briiiK idxtut such a sound and 
 final setttement of the Colonial (pies- 
 tion as shall render a crisis of the Km- 
 pire, like that we a i-e passing througli 
 to-day, imp«)ssible of recurrence in 
 the futiu-e." Nevertheless the League 
 it^self continued apathetic, iind made 
 no move towards r<mli/ing its pet policy 
 of periodical conferences. 
 
 The proceedings in the so-called Im- 
 perial parliament in reference to this 
 
 subject constituted anoth«M" of the 
 series of events to which reference haw 
 been made. On the 12th February last 
 Lord Dimraven moved the followed re- 
 solution in the House of Lords : **That, 
 ill the opiinon of this House, it is de- 
 sirable that the Colonial (Jovernnients 
 be invited to sen<l representatives to a 
 Conference to be held in LondtMi, to 
 I'onsider the advancement of trade 
 within Her Majesty's dominions, and 
 the formation of a fimd for cMrtain pur. 
 j)oses of Imperial defence." Lortl iSalis- 
 bury in a remarkable speech gave 
 reasons in support of the government's 
 opinion lint for the present "the sem- 
 monitig of a conference is not expedi- 
 ent." The sami' matter was brought 
 \ip bv Col. Howard Vincent in the 
 House of Connnons on the 17th Feb- 
 iiijiry. with a similar residt, Mr. 
 (loschen expressing himself as follows; 
 "But to invite a formal conference of 
 representatives of the colonies without 
 some basis or ground which would lead 
 us to believ«' that some progress would 
 be made, and to ask them to meet here 
 without Hi'st principles having been 
 setth'd, upon which any arrangement 
 couhl be come to, would seem to be a 
 course which nujst end in disappoint- 
 ment, and would be imlikely to lead to 
 any practical result." Thus, after a 
 delay of a yeai- and a half, another de- 
 clai'ation wiis elicited from the English 
 government, which showed that their 
 policy as n'gards colonial or Imperial 
 Conferences hiul imdergone no change, 
 and was (pute at variance with that 
 which had been adopt<>d by the man- 
 agers of the Imperial Federation 
 Lc^agiie. One nnght have been pardon- 
 ed for ihinking that these declarations 
 would have settled the matter, but this 
 was not the case. A month later the 
 Council of the Imperial federation 
 League returned to the charge and 
 
S7 
 
 ;vis8«d a rcsolnlioii insisting upon im 
 Interview with Lord Salisbury to ur^t' 
 the convocation "of a conference of 
 thu self-governiuK countries of the Kni- 
 pire to cronsider the iiuestion of secur- 
 ing to them a real .lud etl'ective share 
 in the privile)i?es and i-esponsihilities of 
 an United Knipiiv, under conditions 
 which are consistent with the present 
 political constitution of the United 
 Kingdom, and with the self-govern- 
 ment possessed l»y the Colonie.'-." The 
 interview was granted and took place 
 on the 17th .June. ISJd. Lord Salisb\ny 
 fully recognized the importance of the 
 (ptestion, but concluded with the state- 
 ment that he could not summon a cg".- 
 ference of colonial statesmen luitil a 
 definite scheme of Imperial F«'deration 
 had been pri'pared. 
 
 Under these circumstances the colon- 
 ial mend)^^ of tlu' i^eague may very 
 fairly (piestion the motives of the 
 leaders, and di>ubt whethei- these were 
 really entei-tained with a single eye to 
 the advancement of the en use of 
 FedtTation, If contidence is to l)e re- 
 stored among the rank anil Hie, in the 
 singlemindedness and abilitv of tlu- 
 Executive Committee and Coimcil, it 
 will be necessary for the former to de- 
 .vise uieanu at once for making the 
 suggestions to Lord Salisbm-y whicli 
 his letter of July, 1SS9, still calls lor' 
 and his recent declaration almost de- 
 mands. It is not easy to see how this 
 can be done without a gathering of 
 Imperial Federationists from all parts 
 of the Kmpire, such a.s was propos(>d 
 by the Canadian League in 1SK5>. 
 
 On the 5th March, the elec-lions t<M)k 
 place in the Donunion with the result 
 of sustaining the government <»f Sir- 
 John Macdonald. although by a rt>duc- 
 ed majority. X'>^'''*' '•'* no doul»t that 
 large nundx'rs rtf liberals in the urban 
 COiistituencies, displeased with the 
 
 I trade polieyof their lenders, voted with 
 I the conservatives, ImiI it is just 
 as certain that many more of tht> 
 lattei- in the a''ricMltui'al distiicts 
 (listiiets must have v.ifed against the 
 govei'innent. most likely on account of 
 the hard times among the farmers, and 
 , reasoning that as these could not be 
 J worse it might be jus well to try a 
 j change of government as a pt»ssible 
 ! cure. Other issues, such as those con- 
 nected with th(> K<|ual liights agitation, 
 may have com)>lica*ed the tpiestion 
 submitted to the electors, but on the 
 whoh' the conclusion seems justified 
 that the agricultural conununities are 
 getting more and more accustomi'd t(» 
 [ "look to Washington." That they 
 ; would find coimnercial or political sal- 
 vation there is veiy much to be doubt- 
 «'d, but they may think tlu're is a 
 chance, and nothing in thesliape of a 
 chance is otVered ihem from any othei- 
 (|uart('r. 
 
 Sir ,lohn M.icdonahl, at the age of 7(5, 
 took part in the contest with his usual 
 energy, and as regardless of thecon- 
 se<pieiices to himself as any high soid- 
 ed (iinnnander on llic Held of battle. 
 No doubt like Wiilington at Waterloo 
 he was told by his aides, "This is no 
 place for you ; you had better move ;'' 
 and no doubt he gave t he same rejily, 
 " I will, when I have seen tiiesc fellows 
 (►ft'." .\l)oul three months afterwards 
 onthe<>tli .June. 1S!)1. he may be said 
 have "dii'd of ids W(»iM'ds." reccivt'd in 
 his last great polili<al campaign, or, as 
 he himself called it his "last effort foi' 
 the lUiity of the Kmpiic and the {)re- 
 servafion of o\n' commercial and poli- 
 tical freedom." In the Dominion he 
 cannot be replaced and in Fngl.'ind the 
 Imperial Feder.-ition League will, no 
 doubt, now fully realize I liat, while they 
 have l>(>en fumbling and nnuniding in 
 refei-ence to a policy, theii' wisest ami 
 
88 
 
 nioHt powerful ally in this comitry has | 
 pjiNsed away. I 
 
 TIk' recent electoral contest was i 
 fou^lil between a majority of loyal 
 Canadians, with little oi- no nioi-al oi- 
 material sn|)|)ort from the I'niled 
 Kingdom or the Kmpire, and a discoii- | 
 tt^nted or disloyal mini>rity enjoyiii};' 
 the sympathy of the great mass of the | 
 people (»f the United States, and j 
 and not a little substantial assist- 1 
 ance from certain active spirits , 
 among them. Tlu- gi-avity (»f the 
 issutf wjus roc'ignized by many 
 of the statesmen and leading news- 
 papersof Great Britain, but expressions 
 of sympathy for or suggestions of aid 
 to those colonists who wei-e fighting 
 the battle of the Kmpire, as well as 
 their own, were few and far between. 
 Since the victory nmch of the interest 
 in the struggle of Canadian political 
 parties has subsided. The SntfsiiKtn 
 thinks that the Canadian conserva- 
 tives should see the ne^-issity of bi'- 
 connng fr«'e tradei-s : the Shtndard 
 admits that the pi-ospect for Canada 
 cannot be said to be moi'i' i-eassuring if 
 she turns from the south and looks east- 
 ward for relief, and it adds that the 
 project of creating an hnperial Zoll- 
 verein, into which Canada might ent<!r 
 with the rest of the Colonies, is indeed ' 
 a visionary one. A crumb of comfoi-t 
 is perhaps aiTorded us in a leading 
 article in the T'nnrs of ."ith May, Irom 
 which we quote the following remark : 
 "Tlu' Canadians have proposed giving 
 tariff beni'ttts to the Americans and to 
 the West Indies -who by the way have 
 not shewn themselves appreciative of i 
 thefavor— but neverto thepeoi>leof the 
 mother country." The taiilT benetits 
 here referred to are of the nature of ^ 
 preferences, or discrinunations, and 
 there is not the slightest doubt that 
 Canada would offer the same to Grout 
 
 Bi'itain. if there was the sliprht<»Kt 
 chaiure of their being reciprocated. 
 
 Hut through the cloud of English 
 blindness or indifference, not to men- 
 .ion hostility, a ray of suidight has 
 broken. l\'i'hai>s the most important 
 ev«'nl in the series which we are trying 
 to descril)e is the formation in thv Uni- 
 ted Kingdom of the United Empire 
 Trade League. In April a general in- 
 vitation was isHut>d by Mr. C. E. How- 
 ard Vincent to form "a strong associa- 
 tion having the great aim in view of 
 developing by all possible means the 
 connnercial relations between the 
 Mother (/0\mtry and the ('olonies, and 
 between the Colonies themselves." 
 Although the nudti|)lication of such 
 organisations is to be regretted, it 
 seems to be unavoidable in view of the 
 fact that the Council of the Imperial 
 Federation Lt'ague avoids the consider- 
 ation of the conuneirial (juesti<»n, an«l 
 busies itself al»out pi'oviding the colon- 
 ies with political '* privih'ges and re- 
 s))onsibilities." The new Ij<'ague will, 
 without doubt, earn a nmch wider 
 sympathy, and mow. rapidly achic've 
 its ((bject of establishiug " nmtually 
 advantageous trade relations among 
 all who shai-e allegiance to Her Majesty 
 the Queen." Alnnidy over seventy 
 membeis of the English House of Com- 
 m<»ns have signified their apni-obation 
 of its object, and in the corresponding 
 body of the Dominion nearly a hund- 
 red mi'nd)ers have declai'ed over their 
 own signatui'es their willingness to join 
 the new League. Lord Salisbury, how- 
 ever, pt)ints out that the League "nuist 
 work hard to convert their countrymen 
 to the Leagul^s way of thinking, for it 
 was impossible for England to give 
 preferential treatment to the Colonies 
 at the «'xpenseof tluiA'st of the world. ' 
 His Lordship shomu be reminded 
 that eliarity begins at home and he 
 
80 
 
 iniKht also \ie rocoininendtHl t« con- 
 HJdor an arKuiiient already nseni in 
 this twsay, according to which '* tht^ rest 
 of the world" iiiiKht very fairly be put 
 to expense for the stipport of the Bri- 
 tish navy, hccause it is, in reality, the 
 marine police force of the whole world. 
 By levyinj? a duty on foreign importa- 
 tions, not exclusively for the benefit of 
 inter-British trade, but primarily in 
 order to raise a Defence Fund, the fir-st 
 step would be taken for initiating the 
 *' Kriegsverein" of British peoples re- 
 garding which Lord Salisbury ha8 so 
 fre(iuently spoken. 
 
 Besides the encouraging fact of the 
 formation of the United Empire Tnule 
 League, and the recent favorable utter- 
 ances of Lord Salisbury and other Bri- 
 tish statesmen regarding the consolida- 
 tion of the E)mpire, other circumstan- 
 ces seem to justify the statement that 
 the ({uestion is gradually entering the 
 sphere of practical politics. It has not 
 yet become a bone of contention among 
 th(^ parties, but it has enjoyed favoi'- 
 able c>)nsideration by stutesuien of very 
 different political opinions. Ijord 
 Beac«)nsfield and Mr. Foster, Mr.Smith 
 and Mr. Gladstone, Mr. Stanhope and 
 Lond Rostbery, Sir .lohn Macdonald 
 and Oliver Mowat have all more or less 
 favored Imperial Federation. At the 
 present time old party lines arc being 
 obliterated, and there appear to be 
 grounds fnv thinking that in the near 
 future the party names now current of 
 Conservative, Liberal Unionist, (ilad- 
 stonian. Radical, Home Ruler, Liberal 
 Conservative, Iteformer, Nationalist, 
 and others will disappear, and that only 
 two parties, Unionists andSeces-sionists, 
 will stand opposed to each other 
 throughout the Empire; the one seek- 
 ing to preserve our inheritance undivid- 
 ed, as did our neighbours in the United 
 States, and the other striving to dis* 
 
 '•r«Klit anddismemlwrthe most glorious 
 Empire Miiich the worhi has ever seen. 
 
 I nuist now bring to a close this essay 
 in which, I have endeavoiu'ed to take 
 away the reproach of li'>perial Federa- 
 tionists. who are so often taunted with 
 having nothing but asi»iratio .s, with 
 having nothing tangible to pr< \iose in 
 the sha|>e of practical measuivs. I 
 have tried to sketch a plan for consoli- 
 dating the Empire, giving it an "un- 
 derpinning"^ of ccmunercial and mdus- 
 trial unity and pr(»sperity and sur- 
 mounting it by a Parlianu>nt of Parlia- 
 ments and the Imperial Crown. I have 
 • specially insisted upon the necessity 
 of encouraging and guarding the 
 material interests of tne Empire, in 
 l)i<'f('reiice to those of the rest of the 
 world. Love of country can no more 
 exist in a starving conununity than a 
 healthy human soul in a neglected 
 body. The solid foundation for patrio- 
 tism and indeed all other national vir- 
 tues is material prosperity and pro- 
 gress, well cared for and prom(»ted by 
 wise, far-seeing and practical legisla- 
 tion. This is admitted even by the re- 
 presentatives of the Manchester Scho<»l. 
 W(? are told by an emituMit liberal 
 authority that "doi 'stic conifort is 
 the object of all reforms," and the same 
 author (Morley) in his Life of Cobden 
 says that that great reformer maintain- 
 ed tint in material well being, "you 
 not only have the surest foundation 
 for a solid fabric of morality and en- 
 lightenment among your people, but, 
 in the case of one of our vast and popul- 
 ous modern societies of freemen, the 
 only sure bulwark against ceaseless 
 discoitl and violent convulsion." 
 
 I have been induced to write this 
 essay for the reas«)n, among others, 
 that other writers on the subject seem 
 t<J be unwilling to face the difficulties 
 of detail, with which the question 
 
m 
 
 I 
 
 r 
 I*' 
 
 ■4 
 
 abounds. I also desired to give a 
 reason for the faith, that is in me, an 
 Imperial Federal ion ist, a thorouKh l>e- 
 liever, not only in the practicability of 
 consolidating the Empire, but also in 
 the material advantages and still great- 
 er blessings, which closer union is sui-e 
 to confer upon the whole British (com- 
 monwealth. 
 There are higher considerations 
 
 connected with this subject, which 
 involve the welfare of the whole 
 huaian race, and the xpread of Cvhris- 
 tian civilisation. Bt t it is impos- 
 sible to do more, in concluding, than 
 mention one of these. The statement 
 that "the Empiric is peace" is one that 
 could be made regarding a consolidated 
 British Empire with absolute truth, 
 and it is one that has l)eei emphasised 
 by many of the advocates of Imperial 
 Federation. England, united with her 
 daughter nations, could have nothing to 
 fear from any power on earth, and, own- 
 
 ing, as they do, several of the earth's 
 continents they would have no reason 
 for undertiiking wai*s of conquest. 
 They could not afforil to engage in any 
 except just quarrels and for such the ' 
 United Empire would be thrice armed. 
 It would in fact Iwccnne the arbiter 
 among the nations of the world, and, 
 by its instnuuentality, it might at last 
 become possible for a imiversal and 
 united Christendom to sing :— 
 
 "Praise, O Jerusalem! Praise the 
 
 Lord! 
 ** He maketh strong the bars of thy 
 
 gateways, 
 '* He giveth peace within thy borders; 
 " He restraineth wars in all the world ; 
 " He breaketh the bow ; he knappeth 
 
 the spear and burneth the chariots 
 
 with fire." 
 
 Ottawa, 
 
 Dominion Day, 
 
 1801. 
 
tie earth's 
 no reaM}n 
 conquest. 
 Kf in any 
 ' such the ' 
 e armed, 
 e arbiter 
 )rld, and, 
 ht at last 
 rsal and 
 
 ftlse the 
 
 ■8 of thy 
 
 tJorders; 
 le world ; 
 mappeth 
 chariots