^fw^m^im^^mmm %.. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I If: IKS mm i63 ^ us, 25 2.2 M 1.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 -• 6" - ► V2 /. ^^#L'^^ 7 Photographic Sciences Corporation ^^ 4^ :\ \ ^9> V ^v« »^' # ^. ■«> **?) 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian institute for Histc.ical Microreproductions / institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibiiographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the (isual method of filming, are checked below. □ Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur I I Covers damaged/ D D Q n n Q Couverture endommagde Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaur^e et/ou pelliculde □ Cover title missing/ Le vit litre de couverture manque I I Coloured maps/ Cartes giographiques en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. auti^e que bleue ou noire) I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ ^ Relid avec d' utres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ Lareliure serrie peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsion le long de la marge infdrieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela itait possible, ces pages n'ont pas 6t6 filmdes. L'tnstitut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la mithode normal<» de filmage sont indiquis ci-dessous. □ Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur □ Pages damaged/ Pages endommag^es □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurdes et/ou pelliculies |~] Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ D D Pages ddcolor^es, tachotdes ou piqudes Pages detached/ Pages d^tachdes Showthrough/ Transparence Quality of prir Quality indgale de I'impression Includes supplementary materia Comprend du materiel suppiementaire I I Pages detached/ FT] Showthrough/ I I Quality of print varies/ r~n Includes supplementary material/ Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc.. have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellemant obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, etc., ont 6ti filmies i nouveau de fapon d obtenir la meilleure image possible. Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl6mentaires: Pagination as follows : [594] - 601 p. This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est film^ au taux de reduction indiqud ci-dessous. 10X 14X 18X 22X 26X SOX ^ 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X The copy filmad h«r« has b««n reproduced thanks to tha ganarotity of: Medical Library McGIII University Montreai Tha Imagaa appearing here are tha beat quality poasibla considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in Iceeping with the filming contract specificationa. L'axamplaire fiimA fut reproduit crAce A la g6nArositA da: Medical Library McGill University Montreal Las imagaa sulvantes ont At* reproduites avec le plua grand soln, compta tenu de la condition at da la nattett de i'exemplaire filmi, et en conformity avec lea conditions du contrat d« filmage. Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed beginning with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or iiiuatrated impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illustrated imprea- sion. and ending on the laat page with a printed or illustrated impression. Les exemplairea originaux dont la couverture en papier eat imprimie sont filmte en commenpant par le premier plat et en terminant solt par la darnlAre page qui comporte une emprelnte d'impression ou d'lilustratlon, solt par le second plat, salon le caa. Toua les autras exemplairea originaux sont filmte an commandant par la premiere page qui comporte une emprelnte d'impression ou d'lilustratlon et en terminant par la dernidre page qui comporte une telle emprelnte. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol — ^ (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever appliaa. Un dee symboles suivants apparaftra sur la dernlAre image de chaque microfiche, selon le caa: le symbols — »- signifie "A SUIVRE ", le symbols V signifie "FIN". Mapa, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratioa. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, aa many frames as required. The following diagrama illustrate the method: Lea cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre fiimta A dee taux de reduction diffirents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre reproduit en un seul cllchA, 11 est filmA A partir de I'angle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite, et de haut en bas. en prenant le nombre d'images nteessaire. Les diagrammes suivants illustrent la m^thoda. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 DISCUSSION ON CARCINOMA. NOTES ON THE PARASITIC THEORY OF CANCER Bv C. F. Martin, B.A., M.D. Demonstrator of Patholog> Gill University : Assistant Physician, Royal Victoria Hospital. So much has been written within recent years on the parasitic nature of cancerous tumours, and the I'esults of investigations have in some respects been so plausible that I thought I could best contribute to the evening's discussion by briefly considering the possibilities of this theory and observe on what grounds we may be induced to place malignant tumours in the category of parasitic affections. While not presuming to champion the advocates of this theory, inasmuch as my experience is so limited, I will nevertheless endeavour to lay stress on its most favourable features, many of which render the parasitic nature of cancer something even more than a probability. We can- not at all events repudiate the theory without a careful consideration, for among its adherents are numbered two scientists whose names stand foremost in bacteriology and pathology. Metchnikoff after ex- amining the .specimens prepared by English and European investi- gators emphatically pronounced in favour of the presence of parasites in cancerous tumours, while Virchow is so strongly imbued with the same idea that he is withholding his final volume on tumours, trusting that the near future may bring increa'sed light on the etiology of malignant growths. It must, however, be confessed that while per- haps many observers are willing to acknowledge the presence of parasites in cancer masses, they are less readily satisfied that their presence is directly associated with the cause of the malady. Though it be true that the parasitic theory of cancer formations is at present incapable of scientific proof, yet it should not be forgotten that in many, indeed in the majority of our infectiour, diseases, we are unable to carry out the postulates laid down by Koch to prove their parasitic nature. The epidemic nature of some of course renders this character probable, but in others even this feature is wanting. The amoeba of dysentery is generally accepted as being the causative factor of the tropical malady, yet the absolute proof is entirely want- ing. Few scientists to-day will deny the relation between typhoid fever and Eberth's bacillus, or of the plasmodium malariae to the disease with which it is associated, yet in neither instance are we positively enabled to fulfil the requirements necessary to establish mm MARTIN — DISCUSSION ON CARCINOMA. 695 satisfactorily the etiological relationship. As in these diseases, so too in carcinoma, where our knowledge is likewise very limited so far a»s the true cause is concerned, we are scarcely justified in discarding the theory of a parasitic origin till definite proofs to the contrary are established. The customary classification of tumours, in so far as it does not consider their etiology, has been formed entirely on a basis of con- venience in their nomenclature. The histological structures alone are taken as a means of differentiation beoween all the different types of neoplasms quite regardless of the cause inducing their growth. The distinction likewise between benign and malignant tumours is as much a clinical as a pathological differentiation and conveys no idea of their respective etiology, and one of the reasons is apparent. At the time when Virchow's classical work on cellular pathology appeared, parasites played absolutely no role in the study of pathological pro- cesses, and as the nature of tumours was then even more in doubt than now his desire was to formulate merely some convenient plan of nomenclature. It is here that the first difficulty arises, for the merest superficial study of benign and malignant tumours suggests at once a difference so great as to render it more than likely that their respective causes are equally distinct. There are few pathologists to-day who ascribe the formation of malignant tumours to an overgrowth of embryonic cell remains, as suggested by Cohnheim for the origin of benign tumours, and the reason is obvious. When a tissue in its overgrowth ceases to remain local, ceases to retain its simple structure and regu- larity of outline, but tends to be distributed throughout distiint portions of the body, there is at once suggested some special kind of stimulus, some unusual cause for such an irregular mode of procedure and extension of cells. The cause can hardly be identical with that for other more benign tumours, else one would surely get at some time or other an extension by metastases of lipomata, fibromata, etc. This, however, never does occur with the same invasive propensities, and there is at no time a paramount tendency to extension even locally. Some would explain this by the greater regenerative and proliferative power of epithelial cells over any other kind of tissue. While, howev6r, such is the case, it is but a poor explanation of the atypical character of the growths in malignant tumours. Rapidity of growth alone can certainly not explain it, for whenever the epithelial growths extend rapidly it is because they find paths of small resist- ance, i. e., the looser tissues and the surfaces, forming thus cauliflower excrescences, and so forth. It is rather where their growth is slow ■ v ... ■ . ' 1 ' ' ' ■.!■■■ ■ L' ; '!:■•' ' ik •^na Maw 596 MARTIN — DISCUSSION ON CARCINOMA. that they invade denser tissues and infiltrate. Fibromata and other benign tumours may remain untreated for years and their tendency to invasion of other tissues is never manifest. They remain nearly always localized, encapsulated, and cause injury only by mechanical pressure. „ Th(5 ({uestion is rejvsonably luskcd as to why in the one case we get metastases and not in the other, if a mere overgrowth of cells from irritation or other non-parasitic causes will account for the origin of both forms of tumours. The explanation cannot l)e ottered that the nature of the individual cells of benign growtlis unfits them for trans- mission by vessels, for when the varied nature and sizes of cancer and sarcoma cells be considered it is not to be supposed that cells of other tumours find greater difficulty in passing through the vessels. Again, the mere fact that emboli of fat glt)bules can be; distributed over the body after fractures, etc., and be found in the smallest capillaries of the lungs would show that in one kind of tumour at least there is no mechanical obstruction to the passage of its elements by vessels. There is further in malignant tumours not only a great activity, but this activity is directed in a special w ly. It is a true invasion of tissues — and invasion of vessel walls of all forms of tissues and by all po.ssible channels. Wherever a distant part is infected with cells froiii the original growth the process begins anew. So far as I ani aware there is no other pathological process apart from parasitic attections possessing this same tendency of invasion and extension. A further point of interest as illustrating the insufficiency of Cohn- heim's theory as applied to malignant growths is obtained from a com- parative study of tumours. Metchnikoff' has pointed out that in the invertebrates cancer does not exist, while on the other hand it is very probable t;..it cell renmants of epiblastic origin frecpiently oc* .n this order of life, so that reasoning by analogy we are scarcely justi- fied in attributing to such remnants the cause of cell proliferation in malignant growths so far as vertebrates are concerned. To examme into the nature of malignant neoplasms it is in the fir.st degree necessary that we should see if in other parasitic diseases we have any evidence of new growths — it, in other words, parasites can induce cell proliferations in any way analogous to cancers. Of this I think we have abundant proof, and it will be of interest to institute a few com- parisons between cancerous disease and those maladies where multiple new growths occur from the invasion of the parasite. Prof. Coats and others have asserted that an essential difference exists between the lesions found in parasitic diseases and thosj occurring in cancer, MARTIN — DISCUSSION ON CARCINOMA. 5!)7 that in the formor the results arc always irritative, inHaimnatory and destructive, in the \f*^\ r purely prolitVirntive. To these views, how- ever, can be opposed the autliority of e(|nally eapalih^ patholo<^ists, who insist on the neoplastic nature of such niala can induce a hyperplasia of cells, a true tumour not running the ordinary course of inflammation. In chronic malaria the almost constant result of the parasitic infection is to produce in the spleen an enonnous over- growth in itfl essential cells and the fibrous stroma surrounding them. It would seem, then, from what has been said, that parasites are quite capable of inducing overgrowths of tissue purely hyperplastic in character. And further, it is known, that in some at least of the infectious disebses the parasites select chiefly certain cells for their habitat dur- ing a part at least of their life history. In malaria the blood cells 39 urn : \ 'I \ I if Hi *■■',; /A I i ',■■^1 1 ,: %. I', [i ^ 598 MARTIN — DISCUSSION ON CARCINOMA. are selected, in leprosy the large multinuclear leprosy cells, in tuber- culosis the bacilli are nearly always found in giant cells, in the last instances an active growth being apparent from the multiple nuclei. It may, then, be asked with reason, if cancer be parasitic why the epithelium calmot equally well be selected as a cellular habitat by parasites just as the blood cells, etc., in other diseases. Advocates of the parasitic theory of cancer find their organism constantly within the epithelial cells and it is here that the proliferation occui's. Hitherto the instances given of hyperplasia have concerned cells other than those of epithelial structure, but we do not by any means lack an example where true epithelial overgrowths are induced by parasitic invasions ; this is found in a disease of rabbits known as coccidiosis. Since the researches of Malassez, Delepine and others it has been recognized that certain parasites (whose form and general character bear a striking resemblance to the supposed organism of cancer) often infest the alimentary tract of ral)bits '\nd make their way thence to the liver, where they invade the epithelial cells in the bile ducts. As a direct result, an extensive proliferation of the epithe- lial cells takes place and also of the tibrous stroma about them, so much so that a luxuriant overgrowth occurs resembling very much a malignant adenoma of the I'ectum. (v. fig. F and Nos. 1 to 7.) From what has been said, then, it seems clear that, firstly, parasites are quite capable of producing cell proliferation independent of inflammatory conditions, i. e., a proliferation analogous in general features to cancer ; that, secondly, they produce metastases, as does cancer ; that, in the third place, it is not uncommon to find parasites selecting special cell structures for their habitat ; and that, finally, we can find in the lower animals an epithelial overgrowth and the forma- tion of a fibrous stroma, all being induced by the invasion of a parasite. Before considering further the general reasons upon which the parasitic theory of cancer may be based, I will briefly describe the main characters of the organism supposed to be concerned in the formation of cancer tumours, though the diagram kindly prepared by Dr. Adami will perhaps better give an idea of their nature. In attempting such a description one is beset with difficulties, owing to the x'firious opinions among investigators as to what is and what is not to be regarded as the true parasite. This confusion arises from the supposed resemblance which certain other structures have to these parasites ; among these may be mentioned forms of cell degeneration, morbid karyokinesis of cancer cell nuclei, invaginated cancer cells, enclosed leucocytes, and endogenous cell formations. ^©^ I'iu'iuvs A to K. Snpi)ose(l purasites within liuiccr cells (after Hiiirer). Fik'ure F. Proliferated epithelium of bile duct, eoiitiiiiiiiiKcoeeidia (after I)elei)iiie and others). I'ignres 1 t(j 7. Coccidia in various stages. i-r 'ir ■<,■> i ■ i. L The sph occi c&li The suci com ciat hyi vac con( the It if t'roi so I inv( mu( fror A fact ing the too, tine inv« is s part T thes pro> arisi site othe moFi fron whe and met{ anin in t prov plan MARTIN — DISCUH8ION ON CARflNOMA. 599 Pift The main opinioo*. however seem to ho thut the parasit«i is usually spherical or oval, with a more or less rounded nucleus, this latter occupjang a relatively small area of the parasites' protoplasm. The ceJl hody is homogeneous or mottled, sometimes radially striated. These striae were sujiposed by some to be evidences of reproduction, such as is observed in malarial parasites. A capsule of double contour surrounds the organism and seems to be intimately asso- ciated with the nrotoplasm of the cancer cell, as though secreted by the latter. Sometimes the organism seems to lie in a kind of cyst or vacuole, in this way re8end>ling the bacilli of lepro.sy, where th(! same condition often occurs. The parasite may be single or multiple within the cell, and invades sometimes the nucleus, sometimes the protoplasm. It is largely from the staining reactions that these are ditterentiated from the various other structures above mentioned. Where, however, so much strife is at present going on among the various English investigators I will not attempt further details in this matter, inas- much as there seems but little po.ssibility of rendering it more lucid from our present knowledge. A point of interest, however, in regard to these bodies lies in the fact that they are invariably found in greater numbers at the grow- ing edge of the tumour, and inasmuch as the cells in these areas are the youngest they are also least likely to be degenerated. Where, too, the greatest degeneration is seen in the tumours one finds a dis- tinct paucity of parasites. An examination of the individual cells invaded by the parasite shows, further, that while little or no mitosis is seen in them, there is active proliferatiim in adjacent cells, the parasite thus acting as a stimulator of cell growth. These facts in themselves though suggestive of the possibility that these organisms produce the cell proliferation, are of course far from proving it. In attempting to establish the proof serious difficulties arise, inasmuch as hitherto no t>ne has succeeded in isolating the para- site and obtaining it in cultures. But the same is practically true of other diseases — hydrophobia, scarlatina and many others. Further- more, however, we cannot be satisfied that trnn-smission by inoculation from man to man is possible. A few isolated cases have been recorded where some of the lower animals have successsully been inoculated and the transmitted portions have given rise to new growths with metastases. This, it may be argued, is a mere grafting from one animal to another, but inasmuch as the same organisms will be found in the metastases of the inoculated animals, it remains yet to be proven that there is not something else besides the simple trans- plantation of cells. It is c uite as possible that the experimenters, :: ;■■;■•»■ i •!■ it f I i ■ I i i 1 :■] ■, 600 MARTIN — DiHClJSSiON ON CARCrNOMA. without boing aware of it, overcame in hoiui; way the obstacles thai ordinarily prevent succe.sHt'ul inoculationf Within the last few months a inelauotic sarconui was readily transmitted to a rabbit and in a few weeks had given rise to metastases throughorit the body. At all events we are too little familiar as yet with all tlu^ conditions necessary to profluce successful noculations. How many people have already ingest-ed myriads of cholera vibrios by way of experiment and have subsecjuently felt no ill effects ? Our methods at the present day are in many respects imperfect, and failures do not necessarily I'ender the general underlying principles fallible. On much that has been written on the contagiousness of cancer and its frequent occurrence in people who live much together I cannot touch, nor of the plausibility of the so-called " cancer-houses," which are marked as being contaminated. I would merely conclude by suggesting that until some other reasonable explanation is aftbrded we are not in a position to despise the parasitic theory of cancer formations. It has been 9o often urged, and with apparently great emphasis, that in the majority of cancerous growths there is associated some chronic irritation, it may be a slight and persistent one, that I cannot close without referring for one moment to this theory. Whereas it is true that in a great number of cases some irritant is associated with the development of carcinomata, yet in the vast majority of instances the self-same in*itant may be at work in just the same mild chronic and intermittent way and yet never induce a cancer. Of the number of men who use clay pipes there is surely but a small minority in whom cancer develops on the lip, while in the cases of cholelithiasis how rarely do we find cancerous conditions of the gall-bladder. It is true that with almost every case of cancer of that organ gall-stones are associated, but the mere presence of the cancer, implying as it does some destruction of the epithelium, etc., will supply a most ready nucleus around which concretions can form. Considering, then, hov; common are gall-stones and how rare is malignant disease of the gall- bladder, the latter would seem to be the primary condition and the cholelithiasis a secondary result. The same holds true to a more marked extent perhaps in calculi of the urinary bladder, which, in themselves so frequent, yet only under the rarest conditions are associated with epithelioma of that organ. If it be true that chronic mild irritation can stimulate epithelial cells to overgrowths of a malignant type, we have yet to explain why this condition does not more often result from such a pressure. 'Che persistent irritation which produces a clavus never, or scarcely ever, MARTIN — DISCUSSION ON CAIU'INOMA. 601 results in an epithelioma ; thei'e occurs inen^ly a superficial growth of epithelium, layer upot I.'yer, never tending to l)eco:ne malignant, never forming metastases. Where chnmic inHanniiation exists there ensues frequently an extensive downward growth of the epithelial structures, hut always more or less regular in its dlstrihution. There are, however, occasions where scar tissue can develop into an atypical growth of epithelium, and this, it must be admitted, is difficult to explain. Here again, however, chronic irritation alone will fail to give an explanation, else the condition should be far more frecjuent than actually occurs. It would seem that irritation alone, then, cannot explain the forma- tion of cancerous tumours, that to the more activity of epithelial cells alone cannot be accredited the formation of cancers, and it would seem that our only resource is to examine for some deeper cause, to search for the original stimulus which brings to the cells the power to proliferate. It has been shown how characteristic are new growths as the result of parasitic invasion and how scarce are evidences «f similar growths in diseases that are proven to be non-parasitic. 80 that placing together all our facts we feel that, for the pre.sent at least, there still remains a hope that in the near future something more may be discovered to account for the similarity of mai.j. it processes to those in the infective diseases. helial why The ever, I i