rMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I 1.25 '-111^ |||||2.5 «^ lis 1 2.2 1^ 2.0 U ill 1.6 7 V] /. "c* A .«■ *:'# (y/1 Photographic Sciences Coiporation 33 WIST MAIN STRUT WIBSTM.N Y MSIO «716) a7a-4S03 4is % \# %^ • t/i -^ vV CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian do microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques The c to thi The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographicaily unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked below. D D D D D D a n Coloured covers/ Couverture da couleur I I Covers damaged/ Couverture endommag^e Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaur^e et/ou pellicul^e □ Cover title missing/ Let! citre de couverture manque I I Coloured maps/ Cartes g6ographiques en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ Rclii avec d'autres documents Tight binding may causa shadows or distortion along interior margin/ Lareliure serree paut causer de I'ombra ou de la distoraion !• long da la marge intirieure Blank leaves added during restoration may aopear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ It ^o peut que certaines pages blanches aioutAea )wii d '.me rastau.ution apparaissant dans le texte, ma:-? tnrsque cela Atait possible, ces pages n'ont pas *ti filmAes. Additional comments;/ Commentaires supplimentairas; L'tnstitut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a iti possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-^tre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier una image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage sont indiquis ci-dessous. □ Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur □ Pages damaged/ Pages enoommag^es D Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurees et/ou pellicul^es Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages decolorees, tachetees ou piquees r~n Pages detached/ Pages ditachees Showthrough/ Transparence f prir egale de I'impression lupplementary materii Comprend du materiel suppl^mentaire Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible r~T| Showthrough/ □ Quality of print varies/ Quality in( r~~1 Includes supplementary material/ nn Only edition available/ Hages wholly or pa>'tially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure. etc., ont iti filmAes i nouveau de facon A obtenir la meilleure image possible. Theii possil of thi filmin Origii begin the la sion, other first I tion. or illi Theli shall TINU whici l\Aapi differ entir« begin right requii meth This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ca document est filme au taux de rSduction indiqu* ci-dessous. 10X ux 1D( ax 28X XX / 12X lex 20X 24X 28X 32X The copy filmed here has b««n reproducad thanks to the ganorosity off: - University of Britith Columbia Library L'axemplaira filmA ffut raproduit grica k la gAnArositA da: :•- ;; .;,:ji;/?:,;-::;yj,:f .v,;,.;: :.fs^-;:''-;-*. University of British Columbia Library Tha imagas appearing hara ara tha bast quality possibia considaring tha condition and iagibility of tha original copy and in itaaping with tha filming contract spacif Ications. Las imagas suivantas ont Att raproduitas avac la plus grand soin, compta tanu da la condition at da la nattatt da I'axamplaira filmA, at an conformity avac las conditions du contrat da filmaga. c Original copias in printad papar covars ara filmad beginning with tha front covar and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated Impres- sion, or the back covar when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or Illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impression. Les exemplairas originaux dont la couverture en papier est ImprimAe sont filmte en commen^ant par la premier plat at en terminant soit par la dernlAre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires originaux sont fiimis an commandant par la premiere page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration at en terminant par la darniire page qui comporte une telle empreinte. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol — ^- (meaning "CON- TINUED "), or the symbol y (meaning 'END '), whichever applies. Un d«8 symboles suivants apparaitra sur la darniire image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbole — ► signifie "A SUIVRE ", le symbols V signifie "FIN". ■Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction retios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure ere filmed beginning in the upper left hend corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre filmis d des taux da rMucticn diffArants. Lorsque le document est trop grend pour Atre reproduit en un seul clichA, il est filmA A partir de I'angle supArieur gauche, de geuche A droite, et de haut en bas, an pranent le nombra d'imagas nAcessaire. Las diagrammes suivants illustrent la mAthode. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 6 6 THE LIBRARY THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 'i-\/\^ F !f «^1l4' T v4 '14^' w:: »*••■ s > fc. ORDERS IN COUNCIL, OR AN EXAMINATION * OP THE JUSTICE, LEGALITY, AND POLICY A- 'I ' OP THE NEfF SYSTEM OP COMMERCIAL REGULATIONS, "WHTH AW TLvptntijc OF State Papers, Statutes/ and Authoritm, t LONDON: , CllINTGD rOE L»NGMAN, HURST, HERS, AND ORMF., ]>ATERN05TEIl ROW, AMD J. RIDGWAT, PICCADILLY. 1808. . • Price Four Shillings. / Examination OF THl ORDERS IN COUNCIL. T may be premised, that the enemy, and those powers under his control, or who take his part, have no right to interfere in this dis- cussion. This title is confined exclusively to two parties — the neutrals, and the people of these realms. The former have a right to de- mand whether our late proceedings are justified by the law of nations ; the latter are entitled to ask if those proceedings are consistent with the municipal law of England. They have a further right to demand if they shall be in- jured or benefited by this new system. These tiirec questions it is proposed to exumiiie in their order. 'Tfr^- ''StU^.'- I. Are the late Orders consistent with tlic law of nations ? As no man can pretend lliat England has a right to seize neutral sliips, unless they are found carr}ing contraband of war, or at- tempting to violate an actual blockade, tiie defenders of the Orders have the burden of the proof; and they must shew that there was a just cause, for attacking in this man- tier the undoubted rights of neutral nations. The only cause which can be assigned, is that France had previously done the same, and that neutrals acquiesced initj therefore we are justi- fie<:l in retaliatingupon France. This is however quite inconsistent with fact. France, by a decree, Nov. Si, 1806, declared generally, •' that the British i^sles are in a state of blockade ;" with several particular clauses, explaining what sort of blockade this was to be *. The seventh clause alone prohibits jntercourse betvvccn England and neutrals; and that, only by ordering that no vessel from an English j)ort, shall enter a French port. It does not even declare such vessel, iff actually within a French port, io be scize- able. General Armstrong, the American mi- nister at Pans, demanded, if the decree sub- jected to capture, neutral vessels found at * See At>i)ciidix. s is^^j on their voyage to, or from England ? Ill short, he asked whether the term biock- i€uk, in the first article of the decree, was iiised in its ordinary sense? The answer of M. D6cr^s, the minister of marine, (dated -Dec. 24.) was, that the decree did ^lot subject such ships to seizure "; and that nothing in -the decree was intended to infringe on the rights of neutrals, as either established by ;treatics, oi* by the common law of nations *. In other words, the decree, as so explained, .only prohibited neutral vesseis from entering a French port after having cleared out. at au English one. This prohibition is strictly consistent with the law of nations. It is in- finitely more so than our rule of the war 1756 ; it is exactly in the nature of our Navigation .Act. The explanation was acted upon at; least down to last September, when an Aineri- can vess.^l being captured, was released i>y ;..' i^rench courts i-n virtue c*" it. Some peisons 'deny that it ever was departed from; but all are agreed, tliat time was not given for America to acquiesce or resist. In Octo- hetf say some people, France condemned •Americans taken in the voyage to and from England. If so, the same persons adn/it that America would proJ)ably have resented ihis • See Appendix, fifrench of the law of nations. At any rate, long before it could be known that the intelligence of this illegal proceeding had been received in America, our orders are issued* Now upon America, we had no right to retaliate, until she should fully acquiesce in the new and confessedly illegal conduct of France. Indeed it cannot be pretended that the or- ders were issued in consequerrce of the French Government, acting upon a new construction of their decree ; for it is perfectly well known that the report of this change of conduct had not reached England on the eieventk of No- *vember, nor until some days after the orders were published ; and we are greatly misin- formed if any of the King's Ministers, in con- ferences with the mercantile bodies who addressed them on the subject, ever hinted at the report alluded to, or cited, in justification of their measures, any thing further than the words of the original decree, as explained by themselves. They knew of no variation, or alleged variation, in the conduct of the enemy with respect to that decree, until after the or- ders were passed and promulgated. Far, therefore, from giving i\\Q iieutrals time to ac- quiesce or resist, our government proceeded to retaliate before they themselves knew that t^e enemy had in the smallest degree deviated from the strict law of nations. But admitting that America should, (con- trary to all probability ) have acquiesced in the decree of November 2l, 1806 :— The French blockade consisted of two par<s, according to the explanation of it, for which the defenders of our orders contend, — a seizure of neutrals entering French ports, after clearing out from F.ngjlish ports, — and a seizure of neutrals on the voyage to or from England. The former part France could execute ; but she had a per-- feet right to do so by the law of nations. The latter part she could not enforce, in any but the most trifling degree; and, though illegal, i^. was sure to become nugatory. Therefore^ even if America had acquiesced in it, she would only have received an insult, which could injure herself but little, and England not at all. We have no right whatever to retaliate upon a neutral for sufifering h»mself to be affronted, or for putting up with even an iiijiiry, Aioless that injury either benefits our enemy or hurts ourselves. This is involved in the very mean- ing of the neutral and belligerent relations. Further, our own rule of the war 17.56, justifies the greater part of the French deereo, udmitting the explanation contended fyr. Tbd i li I- i trade which Americans ( for example, ) carry on between almost all the belligerent countries and England is, during'peace, illegal. By the naviga- tion act, they may export English goods to those countries ; but they cannot import their goods from thence. At the commencement ol' the war an act is passed authorizing the King to suspend this part of the navigation law, (43. Geo. III. c. 153.) Therefore, according to the rule 1756, this trade of the Americans may be stopped by France without any ille- gality, and should the Americans yield, still we have no right to complain. If we had any title to retaliate in the man- ner contended for, it could only be founded upon the right of annoying our enemy, or pre- venting the neutrals from assisting him. There- fore, it is utterly repugnant to the law of nations, to prevent the neutrals from trading directly with Trance, and then to allow them to trade from this country to France. We may blockade France if she has blockaded us, and neutrals liave acquiesced; but we cannot force the Ame- ricans to trade with France through this coun- try, merely because they have ceased to trade with this country at the requisition of France. The utmost we can demand is that they should suffer as much from us, as they bear fvoni Qur enemies, and in the same way. We may re- taliate blockade for blockade, but not mono- poly for blockade, or tribute and perquisite for blockade. This would be exacting not a " tooth for a tooth," but "an eye for a topth,^* Still more unjustifiable by the law of nations, are ou^ detailed arrangements, especially those respecting licences, and the g,aii;is arising fromj and the undue preferences involved in them. The third order in Council, (Npy. 11^) de-* clares the sale of an enemy's ships to a neutral^, to be illegal. The reasons assigned are, tha| France considers such a compact as illegal^ and that she has covered her vessels by tr;insfer- ences of this kind. It is evident that the latter of these is the only reason for our order, and it must be remarked that this is a practice adopte4 by England as far back as the beginning of last war. — The stat. 34 Geo. Ill c. 68. s. 22. enacts that British registered ships sold to fo- reigners, shall retain the privileges of British ships, (i. e. the monopoly established by fhe navigation law) provided they are registered anew within a certain time, and lays down a variety of rules whereby this transaction may conveniently be carried on. The illegality of the last article of the first order, declaring all neutrals good prize ^yhicli •1 '{ carry Certificates of origin, is manifest. — The neutrals continue trading in our goods with some of their ships; and avoid seizure by France as w^ll as they can, admitting that she enforces an illegal regulation ; but such ships as they fit out without any British goods on board, are surely entitled to carry a certificate of this fact, if they and their government please. Because France takes, or rather idly threatens to take, the ships laden with our goods, shall we be acting in retaliation by taking the ships that are laden with other goods, and endeavour in their papers to sub- stantiate this truth? It would be retaliation, to take ships laden with French goods, and to require that al Ineutrals should carry Certificates of their cargoes not being so composed. It is no retaliation to take ships laden with neu- tral goods, or with British goods, because they yield to the French regulation, and carry Cer- tificates, unles.:, indeed, the J'alsehood o{ ^\\c\\ certificates in the latter case may furnish any argument, which it can only do to the enemy,' not to us. In a word, if we have any right to retaliate on America for acquiescing in the French measures, we must (;onfine our refa- Jiation to precisely similar measures. We can t only ask the neutral to bear from us what h^ has borne from our enemy. The Order in Council, January 7, 1807, is Justified by the rule of the war 1756, of which it is scarcely an extension. The countries under the enemy's dominion, or in alliance with him, are there considered as enemy's territory ; and the trade from on^ port to another of those different countries, as a coasting trade. The principle of the rule J 756 is, that you have a right to prevent a neutral from interfering '■ ith your just hosti- lity, and stepping in between your naval force and your enemy's trade, for the purpose of screening it. The neutral screens most efTcc- tually the trade carried on between Holland and France, for example, if he engages his shipping in it, at a time when not a bellige- rent vessel can show itself upon the sea be- tween those two countries. There may not have been any express law in either state dur- ing peace, to prevent third pnrties from carrying on this commerce; but in point of fact, it must always have happened, that by far the greater part of the trafiic between nations so circum- fctanj'od, was carried on by their own vessels an- tecedent to the war ; and the spirit of the rule |7jG, b to prevent the enemy from bcndiiing by 4'j a great andsudrlcn change of system, which shall throw his commerce, while the war lasts, under the cover of the neutral flag. It may, however, be remarked, that the rule applies to almost all maritime states, still more closely. There ar^ very few if any commercial countries in Europe, which have not adopted the principles of th« English navigation law, and excluded as much as possible, from their carrying trade, the ves- •els of all foreign nations. We do not by any means contend for the rule 1756 ; but if that rule is to be laid down at all, it clearly jus- tifies the Order January 7th, 1807. On theprincipleof retaliation, indeed, recited in the preamble, it cannot be justified with re- spect to America; for it was issued before her ac- quiescence in the French decree could be known. But as the English government had a right ante- cedently to tiiat decree, to issue this order, the intention of retaliating is only stated as the mo- tive which induced the government ♦o exercise a just right, formerly abstained from. Eet it be observed too, that the nations under the 'nfhience of France, to whom the or- der applies, had in some sort identified them- selves with her, by closely following lier com- mands in all things — nay, suH'ering i cr cou- ©(Hufly to interfere with their uuiniu|)al U\\% n respecting trade. A French proclamation was good law to plead in Hamburgh and Holland, Italy and Spain. Those countries immediately adopted the decree of November 91 as their own; they were, in truth, excepting Spain, all filled with French troops, and in the habitual practice of receiving orders from Paris, through from a French commander or ambassador, as the provinces of Great Britain do from the scat of government *. It is not foreign to the purpose to add, that the principle of considering all ports under the enemy's power, as ports of the same country, has a precedent in the stat. 22, Geo. III. c. 78, which considers all the countries under the same sovereign, as the same country quoad tlie regulations of the Navigation Act. IT. Are the late orders in council consist- ent with the inunicij)al law, anil cunstitutioi) of tlic rcuhn? It is an undoubted maxim of our consti" tution, that the trallic of the sul)jcct cannot bercstiaiucd by art of j)arliamcnt. Accord- ing to Lord Coke, freedom of trade is tlic biitii-rigbt of Kughshtucn. And it is evlck'nt, from our best authorities, tliat the right of inttrfciiu^' with couiuicrcc, souiciimc!* excr* * bye Aj'jH'iHli.N, tit clsed, and in bad times pretty generally claim- ed by the crown, is now utterly obsolete, and contrary to the modern form of the consti- tution. The writ 7ie e.veaf regmim, was expressly described by Lord Chancellor Talbot in 1734, as obsolete, at least in its original acceptation of a state writ (3. P. Williams 312). The 6 Ric. II. C. 2. prohibiting all but the gran- dees of the reahn, soldiers and jnercliants, from going abroad without licence, was repealed by 4Jac. I. c. 1. If the former statute was not quite useless, the latter must have taken away a prerogative then first granted the crown, and whicli at any rate never extended to merchants. Moreover tlie writ iic exeat rcgf Jium, was applied specifically to an indivi.. dual, and was not in the nature of a pro- clau)ation or edict, a(ldresse<l to the whole or a class of tiic community. Lord C J. Hale ( I)c portihus maris, P. II. c 8.) la3S it down that all orders of this sort, if issued by the crown, nnjst he in times of extraordinary danger, and pro hac vice. By mag'mi charla, cap. 30, no merchants, whether natives or foreigners, can be restrained from entering OX leaving the realm, '' nisi publicc .un/cu prq-, I ii to hibiti,'' and Coke interprets puhlk^: to mean bi/ statute, (ii Inst. 57.) Iksides the SOtli chapter of magna charta, various statutes have been passed at different times in favour of merchant-strar?gers, and securing tlieir privileges, as well as those of Encvjish merchants. Bv 27 Ed. III. Stat. 2. c. 2. and 27^^/. ///. c. 2. (statute of the staple) all merchants, except enemies, may come safely into England with their goods and merchandise, and dwell there and return thence. By 5 Ric. IF. stat. 2. c. 1. merchant^ strangers are allowed to enter and dej)art; from the realm at pleasure, and during their istay are to be friendly entertained ; and by i Hen. IV. c. 7. alien-merchants are put on the same footing here, with denizens in fo- reign kingdoms. , Various penalties have been attached to the offences of disturbing merchant-sti angers residing in tlic realm, by 'J Ed. III. I. 2 Uic. IF. c.l. II Ric. II. c. 7. 2.5 Ed. HI. c. 1. and many others. By the first mentioned statute, if the magistrates of a borougli refuse to give the foreign trader redress when demanded, the franchise of the place is forfeited to the King. Even alien enemies resident as mer- t bants, are favourably treated by our older I I 14 law. i3v Mii'maCharia, c. SO, tljev arc to he sJ*i cured ill a kiiullv manner until it be seen ho\v their sovereign treats the King's subjects re- siding in his dominions ; and by 27 ¥a\. III. sr. 2. c. 17. they iire allowed forty days or longer after the breaking out of a war, to settle their affairs and depart. "I'he crown has frequently attempted to prevent, or otherwise regulate importation, by its own authority ; but Hale observes that such proclamations were never effectual, and tit an V rate could lead tone forfeitures (De ForL Mar. pt. II. c. 8 and 9) The authority of Lord Coke is equally direct on this point, •and not surely the less strong for the case which he cites in illustrating his opinion. Let- ters patent had been granted bythe crown ia the reign of Philip and Mary, prohibiting tlie impoi tation of certain wines h\) fortign fnL'rcJiu}ils, into any Englisli port excipt that of S<)uthanij)ton. This prohibition bc- ino; broken throuoh bv sonic forciu'iiers, the O Oft.' O ' Attorney General proceeded against them in the Exi'hetpier by infcu'mation ; and the case being argued in the Eschequer-chaniber, all the judges gave an unanimous judgment for the defendants, their opinion being clear *' that the graunt made in restraint of landing •the baid wines U a icsliaint of the liberties ism of tiie subject, and against the laws anci stcl- tiitt* of this realme." (I Inst. 61.) M'ill it be prelencled in tlie reign of Geo. III. that tlie crown can prescribe what merchant strangers are to do in this reahn, when the Judges of Philip and Mary, all in one voice^ declared that it could not lawfully prevent them from coming here, or oblige them to trade in one port rather than in another ? Will it be maintained, that because the crown may declare war against a foreign prince, and make his subjects alien-enemies, therefore it may, without declaring war, im- pose restraints upon their conduct within the realm, M'hcn we see that it has no power whatever of preventing those subjects from trading in all parts of the realm, so long a* peace subsists with their sovereign ? Prohibitions of exportation have also been often attempted by proclamation, chiefly in the case of arms rluring war, and corn during war or famine ; but Hale says, that even iit times of danger they were not much relied on, (^l)e Port, Mar. pt. II. c. 8) Edward III. in the 4 1st year of his reign, attempted by proclama- tion to restrict exportation to English bottoms; but this was found incftectual, savs Male.until statutes were passed, viz. 5 Hie II. c. 3. and lit fi 6 Hie. 11. c. 8. 14 Ric. II. c. G. aiirl 4 Ifcri. VII. c. 10. (which was repealed by I EliziiLetli c. 15. and otlier provisions added,) as also by 5 Eliz. c. .5. and 13 Eliz. c. 15. but the navi- gation act finally, according to Hale, proved effectual. This eminent lawyer concludes that the maxim, ''que la mere soit ouvcrte," (see 18 Edward III. c. 3.) is the ancient princi])Ie of our constitution, and that the ports can only be shut either against the trade of natives or of foreigners at amity with the crown, by statute. The opinions of other lawyers, and the practice of the constitution in later times, lias been precisely consonant with this prin- cij)le. In admitting' of the power of the crown to lay an embargo, Lord C. J. Holt adds that it must be upon great emergencies. The authorities cited for this power in the arguments of Mr. Hampden's counsel go only to prove its existence "in time of war and im- minent danger" ( I S/ate Trials, 540) meaning evidently not merely a state of warfare in ge- neral, but some specific and temporary ob- ject of the war, as an expedition, rebellion in the country, Sec. So in the Case of Imposi- tions, cited for tlie same purpose, Mr. Hake- will, who states the power most widely, 17 ge- speaks of " a short time," and iustauccs, as an emergency wliich would give tlie po\vcr, the "want of shipping upon some sudden attempts;" while Mr. Yelverton denies that since the time of Edward III. any authority, except that of Paihamcnt, can, except for the moment, and in a very extraordinary emergency, affect the trade of the realm {I.St. Tr, p. 504). Even in the apprehension of a famine in 1766, an order in council to restrain the exportation of grain was, in op- position to the Ministry of the dai/ (Lords Chatham, Camden, &c.) declared by Parlia- ment to be illegal, and to require a bill of indemnity. If it should be said that this was in time of peace, we must recollect that, under a similar alarm of famine in J 709, the Queen only issued a proclamation for en- forcing the laws against forestalling, and told the Parliament in lier speech that*//e had done (dl she legally ioidd do \ and in 1756, during a war not very remarkable for the forbearance of England towards the riithts of neutrals, the rights of the people at least, and the mu- nicij)al laws of the realm were better re- spected ; ibr the example of l70y was fol- lowed, and no aj)prchensions of famine could c ■".;■: ir."' ■y i 18 induce Lord Ilardwicke to issue 3l proclama* tion ajflfecling the corn trade. Thus, from tlie earliest times, |thc tenderness of the English Constitution, for the trad'- ing interests of this country, is remark- ably exemplified. They are regarded with more peculiar favour than almost any other subject of legislation. Even in ages when their magnitude was but inconsiderable, every measure appears to have been taken which might promise to cherish or promote them. To say that these endeavours were often fruitless, and very often hurtful in their effects, is only to make in this instance an observation suggested by the history of alt public transactions; and to regret that, a* governments often display lesg virtue than prudence, so their intentions are sometimes better than their abilities. The efforts of our ancestors may frequently have been inju^ dicious, but their desire was always tlie same— to promote the commerce of these realms. lu pursuing this object, they seem not to have cared how much thcv encroached upon the power of the crown, or how little they humoured the prejudices of the peo- ple. It is not unworthy of our observa- tion, that, in many respects, their anxiety for i3t / 19 cncouragino: at once both trade and civH It- bcrty, led them to more hberal views of po- licy than have always marked the commercial legislation of later times. Even in the pre- sent day/ a man might incur the fashionable imputations of " not being trulij British" or of " indulging in modti^n philosophv" whVi should inculcate the very maxims handed down from the Earons of Kinij John and his successor. And persons whose knowledge of the English history goes no farther back than the French Revolution, or who have only studied the Constitution in tlie war of words, which it has excited, would probably make an outcry about **the xtisdom of our anccs^ tors,'* if one were disposed to repeat some li- beral doctrines, ancient even at the date of Magna Charta. If by some of the laws al- ready cited, traders ar^ placed on the footing with nobles, and the great baron's inde- pendence of the king's prerogative, sliared with the merchant; if by a multitude of others, foreigners at amity with the realm are protected and highly favoured ; if within the |K*rio(l of our written law certain rights and privileges are secured to alien enemies them- selves, and they are in some fiegrec secured from tlie absolute control of the crown--^ c ^2 / so U ■'»• r —what will the thought If •« persons alluded to think, should it appear that in the remotest times to whicn the history of our law reaches, «0d before the men wc "^ born wUo obtained the great charter of our lihurties, alT the war- like spirit of iheday^ — allthe inveterate hatreds of a military people towards the enemy, and their contempt for peaceful industry, did not prevent them from extending to the persons of hostile merchants the s;inie protection, in the midst of warlike operations, which the sanctity of their functions secured to the priests? It was in those remote times held to be a duty incumbent on all warriors to spare the persons of enemies within the realm, if they happrued to be either priests, husbandmen, or merchants; or as their rude verses expressed it (in a style which some of our wise and classical statesmen may now-a- days deride.) CUricuSf Jgricola, Mercnfur, tempore belli, Ut oxtfquc, colatf commuttt pace f'ruautur. Nor let it be lhou;:?;ht mere niattc» ^n' on- riousrc cction to ind Ige, uj)on tl »v .iv , x occasion, in such retrospects as these. The . -niarkable facts which have been stated dc- ?e; " ur most serious attention, as descrip- Vsf: f 'he liberal and politic spirit of t!ie Consiituiion from its mo^it ancient limes. m 21 They prove that at If^ast a prescriptive title cannot be shewn tor the narrow-minded views which the litiij men ot this day enter- tain. They shew that our ancestors held the rights of the people so sacred, and as inti- 7iiately connected with those rights, the great i iterests of trade, that they would in no wise eompromise them, either to gratify a spirit of national rivalry, or to exalt the powers of the crown, or to humour the caprice -of the aristocracy. For it is a mere epigram to say, as Montesquieu hath done, in allusion ^o Magna Charta, " that the English alone have made the rights of foreign merchants a con- dition of national freedom." Our ancestor! favoured and protected foreign merchants', out of respect to the interests and liberties of England. They knew that no more deadly blow could be aimed at the merchants and people of these realms, than by allowing them an exclusive posrsession of freedom, while their foreign customers should be placed at the ilisposal of the Prince. They saw the impo^^^ibi^lty of long preserving nny such. limited s^'stem of popular riglits, and they saw too, that comu'.erce being in its nature a mutual benefit, the j^owcr of the crown would triumph over tiie prosperity of the people., as well as over their liberties, the ti mon-.cnttbat the protection of the Constitu- tion was withdrawn from the merchant- stranger. For this reason it was, that the wise laws which we have cited were conti- nually passed and acted upon in along, unin- terrupted series, from the time when they arose out of those early traditional maxims of our Norman ancestors, down to the reign of Philip and Mary, when the judges, ac- cording to their true spirit, declared that the rigfiis of English mhjcctt were attacked by injuries offered to foreign merchants. It is quite manifest, therefore, that the free traffic of merchants, as well foreigners as natives, in our ports, is secured to them by law, and cannot be affected by any royal edicts. The King may go to war witli a foreign nation, and then he has a right to do that which a state of war authorizes. Dut while peace subsists, then>eichant-stranger in our ports is as much under the protection of the law, and as well secured against tiie acts of tlie executive, as any subject of tiie realm. Unless the law prohiljits the exportation of certain goods hy neutrals, or tiie sailing of neutrals to certain ports, they have a right to export and to sail as much as if they were Jiege subjects. Unless the law 4;i>tubli!»hei 2d iegulations for their dealings, they may deal freely like natives, and no royal proclamation can interfere with them in any manner of Way. The crown might with the very same reason levy a tax on foreigners residing with- in tiie reahn, and plead in excuse that it has the power of making war on their nation, treating them as alien-enemies, and thui forcing them either to pay the tax or leavt the country. In defiance of these clear principles, and in direct violation of law, the late orders, among other things, have proclaimed the fol- lowing restrictions upon trade. Threejirsi orders, Nov. 11 f 1S07. • ( 1. ) By the first order, neutrals must have '■•'fared out from British ports (as well as allied ones) for the hlockaded countries un- der certain regulations, otherwise they are liable to be captured ou the voyage. This is as complete a restriction as if they were ibrccd, while in the ports of the realm, to clear out in a certain manner. "^Ihe Sovereiiia is entrusted with the naval forces for lawful purposes; not surely to cruize against such «f his subii^cts as are proceeding on lawful .*' ,!;! I voyages, nor (for the same reasons) to cruize against foreigners who have left his ports iu a lawful way. (2.) By thesccwid order, certain articles, as brandy, sugar, wine, &c. imported in neu- tral vessels can only be re-exported in the same vessels, under licence from the crown. The general objection applies here. More- over, how can any person be legally stopped in his attempts to export contrary to this order? And how can the prohibited goods be seized or forfeited ? (3. ) Certificates of origin may be found on board of vessels in the ports of the realm : therefore, the first order authorizes the evi- dently illegal act of seizing in a British port, a friendly vessel carrying neutral or British property. SLv additional ordcrSf Nov. 25, 1 807. (1.) By the second additional order, a li- cence from the crown must be obtained before a neutral ship can clear out from a British |)ort, to an enemy's colony witli fo- reign produce. (2.) By the same Order, paragraph 2, a li- cence is rt(iuircd before a iicutiul can clear out n V a ^'j di tr: 3 ■ Hi, uith certain articles, viz. foreign sugar, coffee, wrtie, cotton, &c. to any part of the world, hostile or friendly ; nay strictly interpreted, to Malta or Gibraltar. ( 3. ) By the same paragraph, no vessel (mean- ing probably no neutral vessel) can clear out from this kingdom, to any part of the w orld, with the cargoes of foreign hostile produce, which she had previously imported, without first entering and landing the same. Thus an American having imported French wine from Gottenburgh, may be prevented, by this royal edict, from sailing with it to New York, un- less she stops to enter and land it ! Upon this and every other part of these enactments, it may be remarked, that if the crown has the power to make them, the Navigation Act was nugatory. Its place might have been most adecjuately supplied by an Order in Council; yet observe what Lord C. J. Hale sa3's on this subject above. . . (4.) By the 3d paragrnph of the same Or- der, no vessel (meaning probably no neutral vessel) can clear out from Guernsey, Jersey, or IMan, with any articles imported from the blockaded country, except to some British port; nor can any such cargoes enter there, except From a British port. So that these islands in respect of all such articles arc plac- ::Ji ttl In a state of blockade, nearly as rigorotls as if tliey were enemy's territory. Every one of these provisions in the late orders, militates most directly against the whole? spirit of the Constitution as described in the laws of the realm, and the opinions of eminent writers formerly detailed. The Constitution says, merchants, as well strangers as natural subjects, shall be protected, encouraged, by all means induced to trade and settle in these realms; they shall enjoy full freedom of trade and security in all their transactions; while they are on British ground, their rights shall only be touched by the law of the land. The Orders in Councilsay, Foreign merchants are as nothing in the eye of the law — they are at the mercy of the crown — they can only, trade in our ports as the King pleases — they must conform in every particular to his will- in the ports ofthe realm, they alone, of all the inhabitants, may be prevented from sending out what vessels, and what cargoes they please, or of sailing to what foreign ports. The Con- stitution says, it is the privilege of English sub- jects to trade in English ports, with merchant strangers, the subjects of powers at amity, freely, without let or hindrance ; it is the pri- vilege of Englishmen, that free trade be car* ,, I .'"■( 27- ried on at all tiine« bv all friendly sfrantrers, • carrying botli lo and from our ports whatever may lawfully be dealt in, and on whatr.ver destination. The late Royal Edicts say, all neutral trade in English ports is under the con- trol of the Sovereign not of the law — he may impose upon it such restrictions and regulationi as he pleases. But some of the regula- tions imposed by the Orders are still more di- rectly unconstitutional. Foreign vessels are not allowed to proceed as they may think proper on their voyages, but are liable to such deten- tion as the servants of the crown may think fit to prescribe. Licences are required for cer- tain voyages; those licences may be granted upon payment of certain fees; that is, for cer- tain sums of money — or, they may be refused altogether, and the vessels detained until Par- liament shall impose certain duties upon ex- portation. In the former case, a direct tribute is levied by the Crown upon a large proportion of the trading interest, without authority of Parliament. In the latter case, the Crown of ilself takes the first ste[) towards raising an unauthorised tax. The illegality of extorting money for licenced is clear and indubitable. It is not excused by the late frequency of the practice. When the King has declared war m m m 28 upon a foreign nation, it is the duty of all liis subjects to refrjiin from intercourse with the enemy; such intercourse is unlawful, and it is the duty of the Sovereign to prevent if. If he grants to some of his subjects a licence to do that which he prevents the rest from do- ing, and exacts money for this preference, does he not levy a tribute, properly speaking, upon those who continue dutifully to abstain from this irregular traffic ? They are prevented from trading with the enemy, and others for a certain sum, profit by the monopoly of a trade, which either should be wholly prohibited, or wholly free: those others can afford to pay this sum, because of the exclusive preference given them, that is, because the bulk of the community are excluded from the traffic. The Constitution invests the King with the power of making war, to be used, like every preroga- tive, for the good of the people. It docs not invest him with the power of raising money ; or of deriving a profit from part of Wvi subjects out of the war wliich he may be ol)liged to wage for the benefit of tlic whole. " This pro- hibition" (says the Lord C. J Hale, discoursing of the King's power to lay embargoes on cer- tain branches of trade, upon pressing occa- sions) "neither ought nor might be an engine y of all ie with ul. and vent if. ence to om do- ce, does I, upon in from evented ;rs for a a trade, ited, or to pay ference L of the c. The ? power >reroga- locs not noncv : "iubjects liy^ed to bis pro- oursinj; on cer- : occa- cnuinc to gain money for licences; for if the procla- mation had any strength, it was because of the exportation of these things. If it were not a public inconvenience, it could not be inhibited barely by a proclamation ; and if it were a public inconvenience, it might not be licensed for private profit ; if it might, the strength of the prohibition would consequently cease" CDe Port. Mar. Pt. IL C, 8. ) The prac- tice, therefore, which has of late years crept in, is utterly repugnant to the constitutional law of England. But infinitely more so is the new step which the (Jrovvn has lately been advised to make, by prohibiting certain branches of trade, in our ports, not nverelv law- ful during war, but highly beneficial to the country-branches of trade, to the benefits of "Nvhich, the subject has an undoubted right — and then exacting money from individuals in whose favour the general prohibition is relaxed. If those impediments are only thiown in the way of this lawful and beneficial commerce to give Parliament an opportunity of taxing it; then does the crown, without any authority, commence a process of levying tribute as much contrary to law, as if it cotnprlled the subject to deliver in accounts of his income, or com- ply with the whole regulations of a tax bill, 1 80 i I I' except the actual demand of money. Nay, the proceeding is still more illegal, in as much as the trader has a right to perform his voyage until the Parliament imposes duties; and by impeding him, the crown secures his eventually paying money, which otherwise he never could have been made to pay. It might perhaps be thought, that sufficient violence had been offered to the most sacred principles of the Constitution, by the measures already exposed. But an act, if possible, still more daringly and directly illegal — an act in breach of the very letter of our written laws, has been added to the general infringements upon the rights of the subject. The men whose whole clamour was formerly raised against a Parliamentary interference with the Navigation Act, rendered absolutely necessary by the circumstances of the war, and only at- tempted with the formal, deliberate consent of the legislature, have presumed to issue, in the name of the wSovereign alone, during a proroga- tion of Parliament unnecessarily, unconstituti- onally prolonged, a proclamation, ordaining the direct violation of that very Act of Navigation, in its most essential branch. The Navigation Art, and the system of com- mercial legislation, of which it forms the chief u digestj (although it was by no means the origin of that system) has for its main object the encouragement of English shipping, and the exclusion of foreigners from the carrying trade, as far as any municipal laws crin cfFcct this purpose. The fundamental rule of the system then is, that a variety of foreign goods shall only be imported into England in English ships, or ships of the country where they are produced or manufactured. Towards the latter end of the last war, several acts were passed, giving the crown a power, for a li- mited time, (generally for about half a year) to suspend this rule of the navigation law, and permit neutrals to import from foreign coun- tries, whether at peace or at war with us: thus, 39. Geo, III, c, J 12, and 41. Geo. lU. c, J9. This last expired six weeks after the beginning of the session ISOl, and has never been re- newed. But in August, 1803, an act was passed giving the crown the power to issue orders in council, permitting, during the pre- sent war, the importation of goods from enemy's ports in neutral vessels, (4S Geo. III. c. 153. — 16} No power, however, was given to permit such importation from friendly or neutral ports, and the reason was obvious. 32 The legislature intended only to relax the navigation law, where the circumstances of the war obliged them; and to'allow the only inter- course which could be devised with the enemy; leaving all other trade under the monopoly of the British ship owner. The Second Order of November 1 1, is founded upon this statute, and although the preamble mis-states the law, the Order itself only give power to import from hostile countries. So far the mistake h not very material, and the proceeding is ru*"- ficiently legal in substance, bowever slovenly in its form. But by the First Order of November 11, especially when coupled with the Setond additional Order, November gj, although no permission whatever is given, o^' could be given, in any of the orders, to import from neutral or friendly ports in foreign vessels of a different country, yet the most express direc- tions are issued for bringing into British ports, vessels so trading, and in certain cases, for enter- ing and landing their whole cargoes. The Se- cond Order of November 1 1, gives, indeed, the option to all neutrals warned into our ports, of importing their cargoes if they please, but adds, " under the conditions prescribed by law," and as the law positively prohibits the importation now in cjuestion, the mobt fa- 33 torable interpretation of the clause is, to sup- pose that it is not meant to reach this case. If it is, the permission is utterly illegal, and whether it is intended to be given or not, the other orders compelling such importations to be made, are directly and grossly unlawful. The navigation law says, Americans shall not import goods from Prussia into England. The crown has no power by 43 Geo. 111. c. 153, to suspend this law by any Order in Council. Vet Orders and Instructions are issued forcing all Americans laden with Prussian goods Whithersoever they may be sailing, to come into some English port, to enter and land their cargoes. Upon this act of violent iisur* pation over the laws, \vhich the crown has been advised to attempt, all further commentary is superfluous. The illegality of the new system of Or- ders being quite manifest, a Bill of Indemnity will be necessary ; and Parliament may then, determine whether this illegal act is justified by any such urgency, in point of time, as prevented a delay until Parliament should assemble. In this view of the case, it may be worth while to remember that a further prorogation took place about a month after llie first Orders were issued. D si There are, indeed, various reasons for refus- ing such an Act of Indemnity as soon as the King's Ministers may apply for it. If a tem- porary pressure of circumstances had ren- dered some deviation from a particular law, or even some infringement upon the general spirit of the Constitution absolutely necessary, and Government had, fur the mean while^ and as if sensible of thfc illegality of their proceed-- ings, issued orders upon the face of them teir porary like the emergency; the Parlia- ment in its justice might have granted them that indemnity which they respectfully ^ asked. But here is a new system of Royal enactment— of executive legislation — a Privy council Code promulgated by some half dozen individuals (for as such only the law know* them) upon principles utterly repugnant to the whole theory and practice of the Consti- tution — a full grown Cabinet Satute book, not authorising any single and temporary pro- ceeding, but prescribing general rules for a length of time; dispensing with the laws of the land in some j)oints; adding to them in others ; in not a few instances annullin"- tliem. It is an entire new Law-merchant for ILngland during war, proclaimed by the court, not of Parliament, but of St. James% 35 With as much regard to the competent autho- rities, or to the rightful laws of the reahn, as the Rescripts of the latter Roman Empe- ror. It is not such a daring attempt as this that should he sanctioned by the Parliament, against whose authority it is levelled. But the Ministers, should they obtain an Indemnity, may now come forward, and propose to carry tlieir new system into ef- fect by a regular act of the legislature. It will then he for Parliament to consider whe- . ther they can by one deed of theirs over- throw the most ancient and best established principles of the British Constitution. The statute may indeed have all the formalities of law — it may supply the solemnity which the illegal orders now want. But repugnant as it must be to the genuine spirit of our Govern- ment, men may perliaps look for the sub- stance of the English law rather in those fundamental maxin>s of our jurisprudence which it will have supplanted. All the proofs formerly adduced to illustrate the un- constitutional nature of the late Orders, form in truth insurmountable objections to any measure wiiich may be proposed for erecting them into laws, unless indeed some para- mount and permanent reasons of expediency 36 can be urged, for enterprizing so mighty an innovation upon the constitution of the state. These reasons we shall now have oc- casion to discuss, in examining the policy of the new system. III. Jre the late Orders in Council con- sistent with sound po/ici/ ? The late Orders are so exceedingly con- fused, they deliver the regulations intended to be established with so little arrangement, and in some instances prescribe rules so ma- nifestly contradictory to each other, that it is not very easy to collect from them the precise nature of the new system. As an example of direct contradictions may be cited the Second order Nov. 1 1, and the Second order Nov. 25. In the former, sugar, coftee, wine, brandy, snuff and tobacco, are mentioned as among the articles which neutrals may im- port into the United Kingdom fruui enemy's ports; but must re-export under certain regu- lations. The latter order lays down these re- gulations, but substitutes cotton for tobacco; so that it remained a doubt how tobacco could be re-exported, although it was s>ill re-ex- portable : and then in the Order Dec. 18. a general prohibition of all imports, direct from J 37 ^ ■» * ■ • the enemy's colonies, is given under the form of an explanation of the former^Orders. But since the navigation law prevents the impor- tation of almost all foreign colony produce * in any except ships of the country pro- duciiig ; and since the 43 Geo. HI. c. 153, on which these orders are founded, gives no power to the crown to suspend the naviga- tion law, unless with respect to enemy's ports; it is clear that the Order Dec. 18, renounc- ing the use of this power in the present case, leaves the whole importation of the enemy's colonial produce rigorously prohibited, ex- cept cotton, indigo and cochineal, (as men- tioned in the note below) which may still be carried from the hostile colonies to Ameri- ca, and from thence, brought in IJritish ships, to this country. So that this last order, in- stead of explaining the clauses of the former Oders, relative to foreign sugar, coflee, snuffj tobacco, and cotton, reverses the permission given in those clauses to import and re-export under restrictions the four first articles, and , • Willi n few exceptions, viz. cochinoul, (13 Gio. T. c. 15), Indigo, (7 GfOt II, c, 18), nncl colton-wooh, (5 Geo. III. c. 32), which may be imported hum any plucu iu Drt* rikh shipK. 38 leaves it very doubtful whether tlie framers of the orders were aware that cotton is ex- cepted from the provisions of the navigation law. In the Second order Nov. 25, a contradiction in terms occurs, equally demonstrative of the crude, indigested form of these rules. A ves- sel arriving from whatever place with a cargo, the produce of are strlcted country, must Und it before it can rc-cxj)ort to any place; and a vessel arriving with any cargo whatever, formerly shipped in a restricted port, must land it befoie it can re-export to any place; except the caigo is the produce of an un- restricted country, and comes here directly from thence. This exception is downright non- sense, as applied to tlic rvdc. Taking its parts together, the order is — You must land French goods brought from America, and American goods brought from Fra'.ice, unless the goods are American, and brought^ directly from America. Such contusions as these make it dillicult to obtain any corrfct view of the state in whicii the orders have left the neu- lial tra-de. Ijur, as far as ihii cun be mu<le out, the following seems to be their pur^ port. All the poits, and coasts of the enemy, and of the countries under his contruul 5.0 which have exchuled British vessels, are placed in a place of Rcstrictloji, as to tlieir trade with neutrals. — The nature of this re- striction is as follows ; All direct trade he- tween tlie restricted ports and neutrals is prohibited: Neutrals can neither sail ^lirfct to, nor return direct from those ports ; they must in both cases touch at a British port. If their cargo does not consist of tlour, meal, or grain, and is cither the produce of the re- stricted countries, or has heen last shipped in a restricted place, or has heen brought from a restricted place and is destined to a restricted place, it must he entered and landed before it can be re-exported. And cotton wheresoever it has been produced or shipped, or whithersoever it is g<»ing, must be always entered and landed before it can be re-exported*. — The vessels of foreign countries \n alliance \\\\.\\ Kngland are allow- ed to sail7tf the restricted places direct ; but must return from thence to British j)orts. Neither neutral nor allied vessels are permitted to sail to Kngland from the enemy's colonies; but they may trade directly with those • 'I'hif 8001118 to bo tlio onlv lonso tlial can ho ('»ti'aot»tl from tlio cIhiisu iif the SocuikI Onki-) Nuvoiubti 25, ubov« tnuiinculc'ii upon. 40 colonies, both to and from ; and they may trade between those colonies and the Free ports of the English colonies. Brandy, wines, snuiF, and tobacco from restricted countries (not being colonial produce ) may be imported by neutrals in any manner ; but cannot be re-exported witiiout licence; and they are subject, like all other goods, to the above- mentioned regulations respecting entrance and landing.- — The old rules regarding a state ' of actual bicekade remain in full force. — The trade of Gibraltar and Malta with restricted places, by means of neutrals, i? placed upon nearly the same footing with the trade of British ports ; only, that those places cannot re-export, except to a British port, any fo- reign goods, unless they were previously im» imported in British ships, or from a British port direct ; and cannot export cotton at all, except to a British port. Lastly, neutrali can only sail from Guernsey, Jersey, and Man, to the restricted countries with cargoes imported from Britiish ports ; and can only re-export the cargoes which they bring from restricted countries, to Britisli ports. Cer- tificates of Origin forfeit the ship, on board of which they can be proved, by real evidence to have l)een ; and if a ship has ever been enemy's property it is likewise tonliscalcd. 41 • To illustrate the operation of this nevf system, let us take the example of an Ame- rican vessel, and observe what she is allow- ed and forbidden to do. She may sail with an American cargo to England, and from thence to France, without landing her car- go, if it consist not of cotton or manufac- turea goods. From France she may return with a French or -other restricted cur^o which •he must land, before she can carry it back to America. The chief exports of America are raw produce ; therefore almost her whole trade with the restricted countries is limited by the necessity of touching at an English port twice, and landing the cargo once : if the American cargo consist of cotton, it must be landed in the outward voyage also, and can only proceed by licence. — TI.e American may trade directly to and fronj the enemy's AY est India Islands; but cannot, (on ac- count of the former law), bring their produce to this country : nor by the Orders can she carry it to the restricted European ports.—' She cannot pursue her voyage to and from the north ol" Europe, by touching at Man, Guern- sey, or Jersey, either going or coming ; but besides touching there, she must tonch at a Jhitishor Irish port. It is evident, then, that, unless for convenience of smuggling, and ■ *2 evading the French decrees, no Americans will trade to Europe through Man, Guernsey, and Jersey. — The American cannot pursue her voyage to or from the south of Europe, by touching at Malta and Gibraltar; but must go first to a British or Irish port, and after- wards return thither. . This illustration comprehends the only material features of the new system, viz. its forcing all the neutral commerce to run through the ports of the United Kingdom ; its giving the English Government a com- mand of the supply of cotton, and some smaller articles, as brandies, wines, European snuif and tobacco ; and its stopping the ex* . portation of all enemy's West India produce, except cotton, cochineal, and Jndigo, either to this Country or lo any restricted part of Europe. It is upon these points that the po- licy of the measure must be tried. ' Supposing, therefore, that the Americans remain neutral, and obey our. orders in coun- cil, what do we gain ? We do not destroy the enemy's trade, unless he cluiscs to enforce , Ids decree against us ; and in that case we destroy our whole trade at once, except only the trade with America and our allies — in other \\:ords, the same circunistances which enable us to dcsiroy the trade of the restricted iZ countries, must destroy our whole foreign Iluropean commerce. Which party will suf- fer most by such an event? Surely the par- ty which depends most on commerce — not France and Spain, of whose resources trade forms so trifling a part, and which have the whole internal commerce of the Continent secure from all >ur Orders of Council; but England, whose trade is the great support of her wealth, and which exists as a powerful nation by selling to and buying from the states of the Continent. Admitting that we can enforce our decrees most rigorously, Holland, France, Denmark, and Prussia, will no longer trade with each other by sea ; nor with America and England at all. They will lose their trade with us, and retain their trade by land with each other ; we shall at once lose our whole trade with each of them, and consequently suffer seven times more than any one of them. Wo. sliall retain our American trade; but that must be diminish- ed i,n a great degree by the loss of her Euro- pean trade which America will have sustain- ed.— Surclv the wit of man could not havi invented a contest more favourable to the jenemy than this. It is laying down our weapons and fighting him with his own; it is putting the dispute between us upon the very 44 ground which he must chuse; it is hke a dwarf agreeing to strive with a giant, stand- on the same level : it is as if we should con- sent to bum our whole navj, provided France burned all her's ; whereby we should give up a thousand ships to deprive her of fifty. But can we enforce even this bad bargain ? France may with much greater certainty prevent ships from entering her ports than we can stop them on their voyage. She may cut off the trade from England to the Con- tinent by means of neutrals; but we shall find it impossible to suspend all direct in- tercourse between those neutrals and the Con- tinent. While, therefore, the part of the new system most hurtful to us is sure of being established if the enemy pleases, the prohibi- tions which we impose on his foreign trade cannot with equal certainty be enforced. We shall destroy his trade with ourselves, in order to cut off his direct trade with neu- trals ; but he will retain a part of this trade in spite of all we can do; and unless ha feels it for his advantage will not trade with neutrals through us. A strict and general blockade of the ene- my's ports, is at least an intelligible and consistent measure. It cuts o/T his foreigrs >• ^ H trade entirely, although it deprives 'us of our trade with him ; and if rnmmercial distress can ruin him, such a proceeding gives us some chance of effecting his downfall. But the hew system is only a blockade of the enemy, if the enemy himself chuses that it shall be so. It can never, by possibility ruin him, or even materi- ally injure his commerce : For the moment he is pinched, he can relieve himself, He can allow neutrals to enter his own ports, from those of Great Britain ; and thus obtain as large a share of foreign commerce as he desires*. These neutral carriers, it is true, must land and re-ship in England certain cargoes; and many, (but no^ by any means all ) of these voyages will be somewhat more circuitious than formerly. An American bound to Bordeaux, must touch at Cork, Falmouth, &c. which is somewhat out of her course ; if bound to Dunkirk, Amsterdam, &c. she would probably touch at Cowes front choice, to receive advices respecting the market from London correspendents. Admitting that some considerable inconvenience arises from hence, in all cases on an average ; the whole ef- f.It is confwlenHy reported that some rclaxafion of tht French [Decree, has already beea allowed in Holland, though this does not appear very likely. i ( 11 !^ 5 !*^5 r ' I iect Is to raise the prices of the neutral goods a little to the enemy, and to lower somewhat the profits of the neutral, without any gain whaC- fver to ourselves. Our friends and our ene- mies lose each a little, and we gain nothing at all. The obligation to land certain cargoes can do us no more real good. It increases Some- what the loss of the neutral and the enemy, and may enable us to keep a few more custom- house officers. If indeed, tlie orders in coun- cil are followed up by an act of Parliament, imposing duties on the goods so landed, then we clearly shall propose to ourselves, not cer- tainly to distress the enemy's trade, but to pro* fit both by his commerce and that of our friends. Would it not be a much simpler expedient, and answer the very same purpose, to propose that America should pay us a year- ly tribute, and to raise it as she best can, either upon her own citizens, or her French customers ? If the duty which we mean to lay on is not the merest trifle, we may be well assur- ed that America will not submit to it. It may be said that France left us no choice in this matter ; that she began by interdicting all trade between England and the continent, through neutrals; and that had no Orders in Council been issued by us, we should still have 47 lost the trade Europe. Thi« remark is, however, extremely incorrect. Had no measures on our part followed, there was little fear of tte French decree being rigorously put in force. The neutrals would nave found means of evad- ing French regulations, as they have, according to our own statements, always contrived to elude the restrictions formerly imposed by Eng- land. The utmost rigour in the French ports, could only have forced the neutrals to make a circuitous voyage ; and *' certificates of ori- gin " so much censured by our own govern- ment, are perhaps of all the restrictions that ever were invented the most easily evaded. The mly part of the new system that looks consistent with itself, is the blockade of the enemy's West Indian colonics. By the first two sets of orders this was not effected. A provision was, on the contrary, made for bringing over their produce to this country ; and various regulations were prescribed for preventing, or at least impeding its re-ex- portation. Afterwards, however, the raon- 8lr6us absurdity was perceived, of violently and suddenly increasing, a glut already ruinous of such produce in the home market ; and the Or- der of Dec, 18th, confined the exports of the enemy's islands to America. This measure i$ much more plain and consistent with bellijje- 4S ih I rent views than the rest of the plan ; but when jcxamined, it appears equally short-sighted and Unwise. The blockade of the enemy's colonies can only have two objects— -to deprive the ene- my of certain articles of consumption ; and to increase the demand for those articles in our own market. These objects, are, in a consider- able degree, incompatible ; for our West In- dia produce commonly finds a vent on the con- tinent, by supplying the wants of the enemy. But supposing, for argument sake, that both the two ends may be gained at once, let us ex- amine the consequences. ^ The French have borne every Species of public and private calamity for nearly eighteen years ; they have passed through all the vicissitudes of revolution, from anarchy to despotism ; they have tasted only of war, with its whole train of evils, of which priva- tions have been the smallest : they have suf- fered the most unsparing conscription, aug- mented in rigour as the service of the army be- came more irksome and dangerous : to all thii they have submitted in quiet, with rallying points for emigration in the neighbouring nations, and for rebellion in the heart of their own country. No dangers, no calamities, no private distresses,not even the conscrigtioa 49 11 a es ■le- T- itself, has ever extorted a murmur of discon- tent — and we now expect insurrections to break out as soon as coffee and sugar shall be- come scarce at Paris, or the army shall find tobacco growing dear ! The conscription is at an end, or is become only holiday work ; the armies go out not to fight but to revel in triumph, and to amuse themselves with fo- reign travel ; but grocery and snuff are ad- vancing in price, and let Bonaparte look to it ! If he does not speedily make peace on our terms, restore the Bourbons, jynd give up Belgium, his earthly course is run ! — This is the argument. But if it be not a waste of time to give tuch positions as these a serious refutation, let us only consider how little chance any commer- cial bjpckade h of being effectually enforced. Every successful attempt of this kind which we make, augments incalculably the teujptations to elude our vigilance. If certain drugs, for example, were almost excluded from Irancc by the activity of our cruizers, their price would rise so enormously, that a neutral merchant would find his account in attempting to land a cargo of bark, (necessarily lowered in price elsewhere) though he should lose three fourtlK in the attempt; so that we shall in ,vain ■i 'U II 50 continue to wage war against the wretched hospitals of our enemy. To a certain degrcfe the same remark applies in all the other Cases. — In one way or another the goods will find their way from the places of glut, to those of de- mand. Their prices may be somewhat eri- hanccd, and the use of such as are not essen- tially necessary, will be diminished. -' . All the changes of this sort, however, which we attempt to make, and to a certain degree su(?- cessfully, will take place gradually. The stock in hand will beoecnomized in proportion as thefuV- ther supplies are obstructed, and instead of pro- ducing lasting discontents, or even disgust with the war, among our enemies, we cannot hlep fur- nishing the very remedy along with evil, by teach- ing tl\em gradually to alter certain habits in them- selves indifferent. It would not be so irrationa"! for their rulers to expect that some hatred of Kngland should ari^t; out of this policy ; but for us wjio hiTvc not once excited the least dis- position to throw otr the Frenclr yoke by all our hos^tilities — who see the French peopl6 thcmsflves, not merely unsubdued, but evcfi flourishing .'liter all our victories over their 4rade— for us to think of conquering by the carcity af two or three wares, the people whom our greatest captains and innumerable ihips have never humbled during years of the nu;!»t Lutcc.sful naval warfare — burely exceeds 51 the bounds even of popular or party delusionj It is supposed that the peculiar restraints imposed upon cotton, afford extraordinary satisfaction to the mercantile friends of the new system. These may operate either in lowering the price of the article at home; or in distressing the enemy for want of that which it is known he cannot find elsewhere. The former of these effects is surely no great ad- vantage, in the present situation of West Indian affairs. The ruined state of the sugar planter makes it necessary that he should turn a large portion of his capital into other branches of cultivation; and of these cotton planting is on every account one of the best. The price for some time past has been on the decline; and such a glut as the orders in council must produce, is sure at once to injure those al- ready occupied in cotton planting, and to prevent tl o sugar planters from adopting this mode of relieving their distresses. It would »ot be the wisest policy *o complcat the ruin oi the West-Indies, for the sake o( alleviating the burthens which the war has brought on anotlitjr class of the community. Besides that >this class would probably s«..»! experience a glut of manufactured goods, occasioned by the uu:re;tsrd manufacture set agoing under the r i ■ • •'• • ■) iiill j2 vi-ol<?nt operation of the new systcnj, and the difficulty of exporting them — while on the return of peace, another change equally vio- lent and sudden would drive part of the same wanufacture into foreign countries. — To im- agine that the orders will prevent raw cotton from reaching France, is very absurd : They do not even profess any such thing. If they did, the merchants of this country would be the first t« pray that so enormous a load of ■ cotton might be taken oflf their hands, and a chance aflbixled them of sending it to the continent. So much for the blockade as it is to affect 'theenemy. — Now as to the relief of our West India body — it must be observed that cotton, ""' trochineal, and indigo may still be imported tlixough America, and every care is taken * in the orders that the cotton once imported shall remain as a dead weight in the British market. But passing over this part of the regulations, what can our planters gain by the stoppage of French colonial trade, if at ■ ' the same time France stops all imports of British West India produce into the conti- ■ent ? We grow more sugar in our own set- tlements by one half than we can consume at home. Can it be expected that all this (pian- tity, or nearly the whole, will iiud its way S3 over in spite of tlie enemy's restraints upon, on r trade? Then, will no prizes be taken? Will no vessels attempting to elude our decrees be brought into British ports ? The cargoes of these nuist be imported, aad sub- jected both to the restrictions of our own Or- ders, and to the prohibitions of the enemy 'i Decrees. They will augment still farther the glut of the home market. Of those which try to escape our vigilance, some will suc- ceed, and thus snpplying in part the demand of the continent, diminish our chance of forcing the enemy to receive our produce. *>. • t^ie trade of Brazil too will now be laid o,.v,ii, and all the sugar which used to supply ' Portugal, part of the ^lediterranean, and rven to find its way into the north of Eu- rope, will now be brought direct to Englam'- The smuggling between the enemy's colo* jiies antl Ihazil will increase this quantity, in proportion as the interruption of the Ameri- can trade with the enemy is effectually en- forced ; and it will be ro easy matter to pre- vent such a rontr;iband on coasts so exten- sive. Indeed, by thr present orders, the Nvholc produce of the enemy's islands may be carried first to North America and tiiencc to Brazil, from whence, as there is no possibi- 54 r; I lity of" distinguishing it from Brazil produce, it must come to this country ; and no con- ceivable restrictions can prevent this, unless we chuse to decree that mv allies in Brazil shall have j trade with America, and none with ourselves, or the rest of Europe*. Supposing, however, that these insupera- ble obstacles did not stand in the way of an immediate relief to the British planters, this relief can only be temporary ; for the produce which we prevent the enemy's colonies from exp>)rting, must be heaped up there, and come over to Europe, at a peace, to the final destruction of our planters. Wq allow them to receive supplies of provisions; we know that rather than throw su<{ar lands out of cultivation, planters will bear years of clear loL- on their estates : can we expect then any oiher erle*.-t from the most compleat success of our j)lan, tlnn a temporary rise of sugars, and a sul)sc(iueut glut of the market increased * By tlieslricl httor of the Orders, hostile colonial pro- duoi* may be carried (Iiroiigli America, to tlic ports of al. lii'd powor* in Kiiropc, iinil from thincc to tlu' restricted coun'rie^- ; so that the bloolvadc of tiie enemy's colonics is, itrictly sjieakiiijj, not at all enfjrcod, Hni as this is ihecica iittontof the Ord«'r, December, 18, (he (jiicslion is ur^ttcd as if aouxo supplementary rci«trtclions had beeu inaJo. .15 In i.he same proportion, as soon as peace conies, or tlie blockade is raised ? No mea-- sure could be devised more effectual for per- petuating the evils that now oppress the planters, and j)reventing them from appl}ing the only possible remedy, viz. diminishing the cultivation of the great West Jndiaa staples. The interruption of the trade which the Americans carry on with the Spanish colonies is somewhat greater than may at first appear. They are not only prevented from importing more of the consumable produce of those settlements, than is sufficient for the home market: they are also, though indirectly, prevented from employing the greater parr of the bullion which they obtain from thence. This bullion is carried by them to the East Indies and China, and purchases the manu- factures of those countries, with which the Americans supply the greater part of Europe. The mono|)oly of our East India comp'iny prevents them from importing those goods into this countrv, and tlie Orders in Council, ot' course, neither do nor can jjcrmit such au importation. The Americans, tlitreforc, can no longer supply the continent with India goods. I3ut it is the sale of thost goods '4 56 !'r which enables them to pay foj our comtiio- tliHes ; so that by checking their carrying trade to the Spanish main and the East Indies, we in fact destroy a great part of our own market. The same operation, cannot fail to injure exceedingly our Asiatic possessions. While the company's monopoly prevents the capital of this country from finding its way thither> the Americans have, as a matter of necessity, not of choice, been allowed to supply its place, to the incalculable benefit of those fine settlements. Are the same meu who cut off this necessary resource, prepar- ed to throw open the East India trade? If not, (and surely no one would recommend; such a step as a temporary expedient — a war measure adopted on the spur of the occasion) then the Orders in Council, here as every where ch(\ though pointed against neutrals, and professing to aim at the enemy, in fact hit only ourseiivis. In arguing this part of the question, care haspurposily been (i!vn to put the case as much as possible, on the j>l..in st and narrow- est views of national advimfnge, that no one might impute to the advcnarics of thenewsys- tem any disposition to refinement, or suppose that the proofs of its impolicy rested upon spc- 57 ' w dilative grounds. But more general reasons than those already advanced, are by no means wanting ; and however contemptuously they may be received by the supporters of the //cw Code, they cannot fiail to strike every enligl^t- ened statesman with additional conviction c^f its absurdity. If America is in truth our best customer! if she possesses what we require, and wants what we have to export; if the market which she thus furnishes is not only beyond all othei's extensive, but must grow with the rapid growth cf her resources, and continually accelerate the progress of our own ; if from language, l«ws, government, the trade with her inhabi- tants is next to a home, or colonial commerce the most convenient and beneficial that we can carry jn ; if in short, America is, as it were, made for us, and we for her — can any but the veriest driveller in political science,- doubt for a moment that her gains are our gains ; that we are sufTercrs by her losses ; that the less she trades with othernations,the less she will trade with ourselves ; and that to confine her foreign commerce to her trade with Englandr would be to diminish, if not to destroy this trade also. Next to our own territory at^ that of our foreign settlements, were we ai 58 'It I II 1 Wise, as we are brave, we should wish well to the American states. The ruin of the great home, and colonial market alone could injure us more than the rurji of the American com- merce; and the impolicy of fettering that com- merce, if it were practicable, would be exceed-- ed only by the folly which all the maritirae nations ia Europe have sooner or later lament- ed— the folly of stunting, by monopolies, the traffic of their foreign settlements. ' Hitherto it has been supposed that the Americans, (which in truth is as much as to say all neutrals, in the present state of things) would submit to our new Orders. But th^ more probable supposition is that they will at once refuse, and even if at first they should not quarrel with us, it can only be in the expec- tation of the restrictions never being enforced. vShould they find us persisting in the execution of these oppressive decrees, levying tribute ujMm all their foreign trade, cutting oil* some of- its most lucrative branches altogether, es- pecially their rovind-about East India com- merce, h is easy (o perceive from their present temper of mind, how speedily they will go to war with us. And this last of all calamities to our commerce — our manufactures — our who'e system at home and abroad, will be the result 1. :;j' 5& of attempting to establish a code, alread]^ proved to he not only of no advantage to England, but positively detrimental to her best interests, in the most favorable light in, ^vhich it can be viewed. That additional grounds of complaint may not be wanting, and cxar^jles of follies not necessarily connected with the new system, two regulations are U\r- trcduced, one should think, for the express purpose of making a quarrel, and yet incapable of beingen forced. If a neutral vessel, carrying a cargo not British, has a certificate of this fact' on board, she is seized. The utter disregard of all justice is here as remarkable as the inef- ficacy of the Order. On the one hand it is no retaliation to the French decree ; and on th<? other, unless a neutral is taken very much by surprise indeed, she will have a care that no such " Certificate" nor any document referring to it is ever seen by our cruizcr^. The sale of enemy's ships to neutrals is Ijke- Avise prohibited. Can we wonder if the AmC' ricans object to our forbidding that which we have our.selves so regularly done, Jiat \ve have a standing act of Parliament to facilitate it .^ . Or can we expect that we shall be able to de** tect by looking at a ship under American co-*^ loui-s, the port in which she was built, and the date of her sale to the present possessore ? 66 f if * If any thing extraneous to this wretchea ex- periment in commercial policy, could render it more worthy of our pity, it would be the pe- culiar time which has been chosen for the attempt. We may affect to talk'of neutrals, and in arguing the question of right, the particu*- lar nation was a matter of indifference. But it i» in vain that we shut our eyes when discussing the policy of the measure, to the alarming consideration that America is now the only nation to whom this appellation belongs. When the Orders were issued, Government knew v^ell that in a iew days our comnuuTe vith Russia and Austria would be at an end. The unfavoralde dispositions of those powers nuist have been known to the Americans a» soon aS' the Orders reached them. These Or- ders, therefore, are held up to America as an elaborate compilation of every injurious restriction which we can fancy, to lay upon her trade, as a studied system of determined hostility. — They must appear to be, as in reali- ty they arc, pointed against her alone. Is thi« likely to conciliate the powerful party in that country, who we know are averse to us; or is it likely to arm them with new arguments a'»-;iinst our cause? Is this the way to re- claim such of our own friends as were driven losite side bv ar^ ** act o, to take )pp >y ^f m ■■■' 61 violence" ^' totauthorized," perhaps, 1)ut very tardily disavowed*? Is it by a policy like this that we can hope to retain even our own party; or to give their efforts weight with their countrymen ? At the very moment that the orders were issued, their defenders tell us, the French had proceeded to new acts of vio- lence against the American flag. Was it then like statesmen, or was it like the present Mi- nisters, to run this race of aggression, and eagerly dispatch our violent decrees, least, if we delayed, the French might get the start of us, and the Americans quarrel with our enemies in preference to ourselves ? ; ' Unfortunately such infatuated notions are to be found out of the cabinet as well as in it. Hatred of America seems a prevailing sentiment in this country. Whether it be that they have no crown and nobility, and arc on this account not quite a genteel power — or that their manners are less polished than our own — or that wc grudge their independence, and hanker after our old monopoly of their trade — or that they closely resemble us in language, character, and laws — or, finally, that it is more our interest to live well witli them than with any other nation in the world — the fact is undeniable, that thd * Sco Kings speech. bulk of the people Mould fain be at war with them, and those who arc a little wiser would never rest till they make them go to war with France. The former wish is plainly tlie worst of the two; but to desire that America should give up her neutrality is not a great deal wiser. How can she assist u^ or to use the modihh phrase, m.ake common cause with us, against France, half so effectually AS by continuing to trade with both, uhile both are lighting together, and thus preserve our commerce, to whom commerce is so much more essential than to the enemy ? There is, in truth, only one line of conduct, which Americl can adopt more hurtful to us, than that of taking part with us ; and this is tak- ing part with our enemy. If any measures of ours can ensure such a misfortune, the good people of these realms may rest satisfied that the late Orders in Council will answer the purpose. And now that which has been said meta- phorically is come to be very nearly matter of plain and sad rcrJity — and we are indeed at war with the wiiole world To make an excep- tion of Sweden is surely drivelling ; to com* foTt ourselves with the alliance of Brazil, is somewhat more excusable; but the consola- tion has not niuch more solidity. If the tradr ' 63 ,\vith Brazil is even considerably exteiuled* ;that of Portugal is gone, and we lose more than we gain upon the whole transaction. The very goods which the new empire furnishes^, are, with a single exeption, those which we want ihc least ; and the traffic in the chief of them will be positively detrimental to us. The new court, too, may be on the whole well dis7 posed to us; but our enemy, while he occu^ pies Portugal, has unfortunately a stronger hold in their interests than we have in their aifec-* tions ; and may easily prevent us from mak- ing the most of the little good which the emigration, so /tf/je/y* described both as to it.^ causes and consequences, is capable of yielding us. r^et us not deceive ourselves therefore. Our situation is perilous; and to despise the danger is not to brave it, but to destroy ours- elves in the dark. All this, indeed, is only an increase of former evils; and the natural progress of the favourite war system in this country. But il.rre is woO" a circumstance in our situation, of a com-» plexion so new and strange, that it may well appal us beyond all the ordinary evils that *Tho contompt of good faith, which is now the fa>, voiirite policy' towards foreign states, has been also exnil bited to the people of this country, in (he late official ac-' counts of the emigration, after. a manrtcr. qtiit« di«igrn(?<ff/l' ttf tha eharacter of the nation. - !■ kl 1 ; :!1 ei surrotind us. Since the last session of Par- liament v/c have indeed lost our allies ; and added four or five enemies to our list ; vre have almost quarreled with our kinsmen in America, and are not without prospect of a civil war still nearer home. But all this astonished no one. — There remained one deed of shame to do, which should for ever blast our reputation in the face of the world ; and leave Us not merely surrounded with dangers, and op- pressed with misfortune^ but deprived of cou- rage to face the one, and fo?:titude to bear the other. Once we might have defied both to intimidate or subdue us. But we no longer have the boldness of a just and innocent na- tion. — *' Our conscience makes cowards of us." — And " a wounded spirit, who can bear ?'* Compared with this calamity, indeed, all that we have been contemplating in the fore- going pages sinks into nothing. But there is in many points a striking resemblance between the two cases ; and it requires but the eye of ^ cursory observer to trace in the contempt of all public justice, constitutional law, and Kound policy, which marks thcOiders in Coun- cil, the work of the same hands that sacrificed the British charactei-aj Copenhagen, APPENDIX Ot »J STATE PAPERS, statutes. Axo AUTHORITIES. i « 67 APPENDIX. No. I. I'rench Decree of Kovemler 21, 1S06. Article 1. The Critish Isles are declared in a state of blockade. 2. AH trade and all correspondence with the British Isles are prohihited. Consequently, all letters or packets that are addressed to Knglaiul, or to En^jflishmen, or which are written in the English language, shall not henceforth be for- warded by post, jut shall be seized. t 3. Every individual English subject, of whatever rank or condition, who shall be found in any country occupied by our troops, or the troops of our allies, shall be considered as a prisoner of war. 4. Every magazine, every kind of merchandise, every species of property, be it what it may, which belongs to an English subject, shall be considered as lawful prize. b. Trade in English merchandise is prohibited; and all merchandise that belongs to England, or that is the produce of her manufactures or colonics, is de- clared lawful prize. 6. A moiety of the produce of the confiscated pro- perty, which, by the foregoing articles, is declared lawful prize, shall be ai)pr()priated to the merchants, to indemnify thcni for the loss they have sustained f2 l! I 68 Ifl Hi M ■ l! I i from the capture of their merchant vessels by English cruizers, 7. No ship which comes direct from England, or the English colonies, or which shall have been theirs, after the publication of the present decree, shall be permit fed to enter any of our harbours*. 8. Every ship trading by means of a false declara- tion, in contravention of the above-mentioned regula- tions, shall be detained, and the ship and lading shall be confiscated, as if they were Eiglish property. 9. Our Tribunal des Prises at Paris is invested with the power of definitively deciding all questions which may arise within our empire, or in the countries oc- cupied by the French armies, in respect to the exe- cution of -^ur present decree. Our Tribunal dcs Prises at Milan is invested with the power of definitively de- ciding such questions as may arise within the limits of our kingdom of Italy. 10. The communication of the present decree shall be made by our Minister of Foreign Relations to the Kings of Spain, Naples, Hollund, and Etruria, and to our other allies, whose subjects, arc, as well as our own, the victims of the injuiitice and barbarism of the IC»glish maritime code. 1 1 . Our ministers ot fo'cign relations, . war, ma- rine, finau.^, and police, and our director general of the posts, are, in their respective departments charged with the CA-GUtion ot our present decree. * This article gives no power whatefcr to seize, even ships (Mitoring French harbours from England direct ; much less is seizure on tiie voyage authorized. h: eo. V-1 "TO M •;; • 1 , r. 1 j '> I No. II. Translation of an Official Note from M. Decres, thz French Minister of Marine y to General Arm- strongy envoy of the United States of America. Parisy 2UhOct. 1806. I hasten to reply to the note which you did me the honour to communicate on the 20th of this month. I am of opinion that the Imperial decree of Nov. 21, does 7iot in i*s present shape alter the regulations now in fores in France on the subject of neutral na- vigation, nor consequently affect the convention of Sept. 30, 1801, with the United §tates. " But although by this answer I have fully resolved the four questions submitted to me by your Excel- lency, I think I may add — 1st. That as the declara- tion contained in the first article of the decree, Nov. 21, does not alter the present French code of mari- tine capture, it is unnecessary to examine what con- struction, restriction, or extension may be given to this article.— 2. That capture, contrary to the existing laws, will not accrue to tlie benefit of the captors.— 3. That an American vessel cannot he takr at sea^ merely because :he is sailing to or returning Jrom an English portf and for this reason — that by the 7th article of the decree we can do no further in France than merely exclude from our ports, vessels coniiug from England or Eng^lish colonics.— . . That as the regulations of articles 2 and 5 a.c in the nature of a 7< .fii^-t'i genera' '> ,1% iliey vapply to foreigners tlomiciliatcd in France, or in countries occupicJ by the troops of his Majesty the Emperor and King ; but that it would be proper for your excellency o refer to the minister of exteric. relations, as o that part which conccns thr comtnunication of citizens of the Ut'ted Stat.s witii England. I beg- your excellency to accept tht ray high consideration. (Signed) T J the >Iinisti^i' Pienip'^'tentiary of the i'"i'f,cd 9tut.cs. No III. viisurance of DECRi;S. I ' ! i.l '■fi 1 ! H ■M Order f)/' Council 0/ 7 t'l Jan, 1807- Whcu'as the French governtnent has issued certain orders, wijich, in violation of the usages of war. purport to prohibit tlic commerce of all netttral j.ations with his Majesty's dominions, and also to pre- vjtit such nations from trading with any other coun- try, in any articles the growth^ produce, or manufac- ture of his Majesty's dominions : And whereas, the said government has also taken up- on itself to declare ?11 his Majesty's dominions to h*i in » 5.tate of blockade, at a tioie when the flecti of France and her allies arc themselves contincd within their own ^Drts by the superior valour and discipUnc of the British navv : And whereas such attempt* on the part of the en ^, v would give to hii Majesty an unquestionable rig- -> retaliation, and w« ■ warrant hii Majcst) . ^ <c- i 71 I) lis A- ir tii ing the same prohibition of all commerce with France, which that powf.r vainly hopes to effect against the commerce o( his Majesty's subjects; a prohibition wliich the superiority of his Majesty'i naval forces might enable him to support, by actually investing the ports and coasts of the enemy with nu- merous squailrons and cruizcrs, so as to make the entrance or approach thereto manifestly dangerous. And whereas his Majesty, though unwilling to fol- low the example of his enemies, by proceeding to an extremity so distressing to all nations not engaged in the war, and carrying on their accustomed trade, yet feels himself bound by a due regard to the just defence of the rights and interests of his people, not to suffer such measures to be taken by the enemy, without tak- ing some steps on his part to restrain this violence, and to retort upon them the evils of their .own in- justice: His Majesty is therefore pleased, by and with the advice of his privy council, to order, and it is hereby oi-dered, that no vessel shall be permitted to trade from one port to another, both which ports shall be- long to or be in the possession of France or her allies, or shall be so far under their control as that British vessels may not freely trade thereat: And the com- manders of his Majesty's ships of war and privateers shall be, and are hereby instructed to warn every neutral vessel coming from any such port, and des- lined to aiiOiHcr such port, to discontinue her voyage, uid not f* i>rocced to any such port j and any vessel i t I •if 7$ after being so warned, or any vessel coming frcra any such port; after a reasonable time i^hall have been afforded for receiving information of this his Majesty's oruer, which shall be found proceeding to another such port^ shall be captured and brought in^ and^ together with her cargo, shall be condemned as lawful prize. And his Majesty's principal secretaries of state, the lords commissioners of the admiralty, and the judges of the high court of admiralty and courts of vice-admiralty, are to take the necessary measures herein, as to them shall respectively appertain. (Signed) W, FAWKENER. . No. IV. ] French Decree, Dece.nler 96, 1807, Napoleon, emperor of the French, king of Italy, and protector of the Rhenish confe4pration : — Observing the measures adopted ly the British government, on the I \th of November last, by which vessels belonging to neutral, friendly, or even powers the allies of Eng- land, are made liable, not only to be searched by English cruizers, but to be compulsoiily detained in England, and to have a tax laid on them of so much per cent, on the cargo, to be regulated by the British legislature — observing that by these acts the British government denationalizes ships of every nation in Europe, that it is not competent for any government to detract from its own independence and rights, all the sovereigns of Europe having of trust the sovereign- ties and independence of the flag ; that if by an uu- 73 pardonable weakness, and which, in the eyes of pos-' terity, would be an indelible stain, such a tyranny" was allowed to be established into principles, and con- ' secrated by usage, the English would avail^ themselves of it to assert it as a right, as they have availed them- * selves of the tolerance of governments to establish" the infamous principle, that the flag of a nation does"^ not cover goods, and to give to tiieir right of blockade an arbitrary extension, and which infringes on the so- " vereignty of every state ; we have decreed and do decree as follows: , t. — •-. i=; . a .■■ Arr. 1. Every ship, to whatever nation it may be- long, that shall have submitted to be searched by an English ship, or to a voyage to England, or that sliajl have paid any tax whatsoever to the English govern- ment, is thereby, and for that alone, declared to be denationalized, to have forfeited tlie protcotion of its king, and to have become English property, .> i. . 2. Whether the ships thus denationalized by the arbitrary measures of the English government, enter into our ports, or those of. our allies, or whetiier they fall iflto the hands of our ships of war, or of our pri-r-;. vateers, they are declared to be goi)d and lawl'ijl prizos,^;,! 3. The British islands are declared to be in a state . of blockade, both by land and sea. Every ship of whatever nation, or whatsoever tiie nature of its cargo may be, that sails from the ports of England, or tliosv of the English colonies, and of the countries occupied by English troops, and proceeding to England* or to the English colonies, or to countries occupied by English troops, is good and lawful prize, au contrary to '' " cccnt decree, and may be capture. I by our ..^ ^--^ j^^: 74 \i I Ml ships of war, or our privateers, and adjudged to the captor. 4. I'hese measniL,;:, L -ii are resorted to only in just retaliation cr tlic ^aibarous system adopted by Enghind, whicii assimilates its legislation to that of Algiers, shall cease to have any effect with respect to all nation'^, who shall have the firmness to compel the English government to respc.t liicu nag. T! .^y sliall continue to be rigorously in force as long as that go- verh-nent does not return to the principle of the law of nations, which regulates the relation of civilized states in a state of war. The provisions of the present decree shall be abrogated and null, in fact, as soon as the English abide again by the principles of the law of nations, which are also the principles of justice and honour. All our ministers are charged with the execution of the present decree, which shall be inserted in the bulletin of the laws. t ! In iiil No. V. Order of Council. Hth Nr ember 1807. Whereas certain orders, establishing an unprece- dented system of ^v;. fare against this kin^-doni, and aimed especially at the destructicu of its commerce and resources, were some time «*!' ce, issued by the government of France, b; which '* the Britisli islands were declared to \ a - ate of blockade," thereby subjecting to capluie and condemnation all f >esselh with iheir cargoes, which should costiime to trade with his Mujesty's dominions. And whereas by the same orders, " all trading in English merchandise is prohibited, and every article of merchandise belonging to England, or coming from her colonies, or of her manufactures^ is declared law- ful prize:" And whereas the nations In alliance with France, and under her control, were required to give, and have gi?en, and do give effect to such orders : And whereas his Majesty's order of the 7th of Ja- nuary last, has not an ered the desired purpose, either of compelling the enemy to recal those orders, or of inducing neutral nations to interpose -with effect, to obtain their revocation, but, on the contrary, the same have been recently enforced with increasing rigour : And whereas his Majesty, under these circum- stances, finds himself compelled to take further mea- sures for asserting and vindicating his just rights, and for supporting that maritime power, which the exer- ti'ms and valour of his people have, under the blessing Oi Providence, enabled him to establish and maintain; and the maintenance of which is not more essential to the safety and prosperity of his Majesty's dominions, than it is to the protection of such states as still retain their independence, and to the general intercounu; uid happiness of mankind. His Majesty is therefore pleased, by and with the advice of his Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, ihatallthe ports and places of France and her allies, or of any other country at war with his Majesty, and all other ports or places in Europe, from 76 i»? ii ft ) :1s whiqb, although not at war with his Majesty, the British flag is excluded, and all ports or places in the colonics belonging to his Majesty's enemies, shall, from henceforth, be subject to the same restrictions, in point of trade and navigation, with the exceptions herein-after mentioned, as if the same were actually blockaded by his Majesty's naval forces, in the most strict and rigorous manner. And it is hereby further ordered and declared, that all trade in articles which arc of the produce or ma- ni^f*cture of the said countries or colonies, shall be (Jeemed and considered to be unlawful ; and that every vessel trading from or to the said countries or co- lonies, together with all goods and merchandise on board, and all articles of the produce or manufacture of the said couiitries or colonies, shall be captured, and condemned as prize to the captors. Bui although his Majesty would be fully justified^ by the circumstances and considerations above re- cited, in establishing such system of restrictions with respect to all the countries and colonies of his ene- mies, without- exception or qualification j yet his Majesty, being nevertheless desirous not to subject neutrals to any greater inconvenience, than is abso- lutely inseparable from the carrying into effect his Majesty's ju5t determination to counteract the designs of his enemies, and to retort upon his enemies them- selves the consequences of their own violence and injustice j and being yet willing to hope that it may be possible, consistently with that object, still to allow to neutrals the opportunity of furnishing themselves wiiJi colonial produce, for their own consumption Shd supply ; and even to leave open, for the pi-esehf; such trade with his Majesty's enemies, as shall be caM ricd on directly with the ports of his Majesty's do- minions, or of his allies, in the manner herein-aftef mentioned : his Majesty is therefore pleased further to order, and it is hereby ordered, that nothing hierein contained shall extend to subject to capture or con- demnation any vessel, or the cargo of any vessel, be- longing to any country not declared by this order, to be subjected to the restrictions incident to a state of blockade, which shall have cleared out with such car- go from some port or place of the country to which she belongs, either in Europe or America ; or fiiam some free port of his Majesty's colonies, under cir- cumstances in which such trade from such free port is permitted, direct to some port or place h\ the ct)- lonies of his Majesty's enemies, or from those colo- nies direct to the country which such vessel belongs, or to some free port in his Majesty's colonies, in such cases, and with such articles as may be lawful toimi port into such free port : • -'.;'. ' Nor to any vessel, or the cargo of aWy vfcssd, Vi* longing to any country not at war with his Majesty, which shall have cleared out from some port or plac6 in this kingdom, or from Gibraltar or Malta, undei? such regulations as his Majesty may think fit to pre- scribe, or from any port belonging to his Majesty's allies, and shall be proceeding direct to the spot spe-i cified in her clearance : • ' Nor to any vessel, or the cargo of any VesSel, be- longing to any country not at war with his Majestyj which shall be coming from any port or place in Eu- •il 78 rope which is declared by this order to be subject to the restrictions incident to a state of blockade, des- tined to some port or place in Europe belonging to his Majesty, and which iiiall be on her voyage direct thereto : But these exceptions are not to be understood as exempting from capture or confiscation any vessel or goods, which shall be liable thereto, in respect of having entered or departed from any port, or place actually blockaded, by his Majesty's squadrons or ships of war, or from being enemiei^ property, or for any other cause than the contravention of this present order. And the commanders of his Majesty's ships of war and privateers, and other vessels acting under his Majesty's commission, shall be, and are hereby, in- structed to warn every vessel which shnll have com- menced her voyage prior to any notice of tliis order, and shall be destined to any port of France, or of her allies, o: of any other country at war with his Majes- ty, or to any port or place from which the Biitisii flag as aforesaid is excluded, or to any colony be- longing to his Majesty's enemies, and which shall not have cleared out as is hercin-bcfoie allowed, to dis- continue her voyage, and proceed to some port or place in this kingdom, or to Gibraltar or Malta. And any vessel which, after having been so warned, or after a reasonable time shall have been alfordcd for the arrival of information of this his Majesty's order at any port or place from which she nailed, or which after having notice of thi$ order. 79 )t i- )r >o ;n lis le jr, ihall be found in the prosecution of any voyage con- trary to the restrictions contained in this order, shall be captured, and together with her cargo, condemned as lawful pi iae tr> the captors. And whereas countries, not engaged in the war, have acquiesced in the orders of France, prohibiting all trade in any articles the produce or manufacture of his Majesty's dominions ; and the nierchanii af those coumries have given countenance and effect to those prohibitions^ by accepting from persons, styling themselves commercial agents of the enemy, resident at neutral ports, certain documents, termed " Certi- ficates of Origin," being certificates obtained at the ports of shipment, declaring that the articles of the cargo arc not of the produce or manufacture of his Majesty's domituons, or to that ctFcct: And whereas this expedient has been directed by France, and sub- mitted to by such merchants, as part of the new system of warfare directed against the trade of this kingdom, and as the most effectual instrument of ac- complishing the same, and it is therefore essentially necessary to resist it : His Majesty is therefore pleased, by and with the advice of his Priry Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, that if auy vessel, after reasonable time shall have boon afforded for receiv- ing notice of this his Majesty's order, at the port or place from wi)ich such vevsel shdll have cleared out, shall be found carrying any such certificate, or document as aforesaid, or any document referring, to or authenticating the same, such vessel shall I ;l I : I ■I \^ X 80 be Adjudgctl lawful prize to the captor, together with the goods laden therein, belonging to the person or persons, by whom or on whose behalf, any such document was put on board. And the Right Honourable the Lords Commis- sioners of his Majesty's Treasury, his Majesty's Prin- ripal Secretaries of State, the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, and the Judges of the High Court* of Admiralty aud Courts of Vice-Admiralty, are to take the necessary measures herein, as to them shall respectively appertain, WM. FAWKENER. No. VI. Second Order in Council, N'ov. II, 1807. Whereas articles of the growth and manufacture of foreign countries cannot by law be imported into this coui¥try, except in British ships, or in ships be- longing to the countries of which such articles are the growth and manufacture, without an order in council specially authorising the same.* * The preamble mis-states the lavf completely. The Navigation Act docs not prohibit all articL'S of foreiga grovi'th, &c. It only prohibits certain euumoreted ar- » i i i 81 ilis majesty, taking into consideration thr order of this day's date, respecting the trade to be carried ori to and from the ports of the enemy, and deeming it expedient that any vessel belonging to any country in alliance, or at amity with his majesty, may be per- mitted to import into this country, articles of the produce or manufacture of countries at war with his majesty: His majesty, by and with the advice of his privy council, is therefore pleased to order, and it is hereby ordered, that all goods, wares, and merchandises, specified and included in the schedule of an act, paseed in the forty-third year of tiis present majesty's reign, intituled, " An act to repeal the duties of customs payable in Great Britain, and to grant other duties in lieii thereof," may be imported from any port or place belonging to any state not at amity with his majesty, in ships belonging to any state at amity with his majesty, subject to the payment of such ^i>»^ ■ I I I I ■ ■ ■! I I I . ■ I . ■■ ■ ■ I — I M I i i !■! ■ ■ ■ ■ .1 ■.» ■■■ ■■■! ■■^^■■l» ■■ i m i^mmm^m^^K^a^mmtai^^l*,* ■ ticlos, as the produce of Muscovy and others. The power to siiHponil tiic imvigalion act, j^lvdii dining this war by the Ptttt. 43 Geo. ill. c. 15T, enables his M»jesty to siispMid It only with respect to (he trade earr'^d on by foiviguers between om ports and the enemy's ports, lirdi^'d theenuct. inj^ part of Ihi . necond <,rdi.«T, (if we misi nov a|)|)ly to the procl.inialions of the crov.n, (ernis formerly reser cd for nets of ihe Ir^i'^latiuc)) *"dy suspend i\ui Navigation Act With respect ir> enemy's porls, and liMv.s the importation /by neutrals of divers arliih's from restricted ports, not hos- tile, utill utterly illegal, though imposed iipot) tiittm h) the fimt Order. C il 8^i 1 >l m &' ' n i* ci itifs, ;i;k1 li-('>)ic to such drawbacks a?! are now as- tablishcu bv Luv upon the iniportalK^u of the said ^.otn's, wArcs, or merchandize, in ships navigated ac- cording lo law ; and with rcsptct to such of the said good.-, u arc^;, or merchandize, as are authorized to be~ n arelioused under tlic j>i()visions of an act, passed in the I'orlv-third year oF his present Mrjesty's reign, i'uitiiled, *' An act for permitting certain goods im- ported into Great Britain, to be secured in warehouses \vith(;ut payment of duty," subject to all the re^-ula- tions of the said last mentioned act; and with nspect to all articles which are prohibited by law fron. being imported into t.hi? country it is ordered liiat the same shall be reported for exportation to any country in cunity or alliance with his Majesty. And his Majestv is further pleased, by and with the advice of his privy council, to order, and it is hereby (.relf red, That all vessels which shall arrive .'itaav port of t.he uuited kingdom, or at Gibraltar or Malta, in consecpicuce of haviu*;^ been warned i)ur- !«uant to the aforesaid order, or in cousequenci of rccciviiiij; information in any other ujanner, (u" the .-aidordrr suhsc(iueiU to their having taken on bjard any part of dii'ir car^roes, whether previous or subse- quent 10 their ^ailing, shall be permitted to report thtir cargoes for rxporlaiiou, and shall be allowed to pro- ceed unon their vovacres to their orii;inal port^ ot destination, (if not unlawful biforc the issuing of the vaid order,) or lu any port at amity v. ilh his Majesty, unr.n rceciviii'j; a errtificale front the eollrctor or t)om;\r(il;ir ol' liir ciistr-ms at the port at which the) vlnch (•(.Milleaie ihc ^-aid eollocloi^ Hh. -. ') inUr, -7 83 and comptrollers of the customs are hereby authorized and required to give^) setting forth that such vessels came into such port in consequei.ee of being so warn-' ed, or of receiving such information as aforesaid ; and that they were permitted to sail from such povl under the regulations which his Majesty has been pleased to establish in respect to such vessels. But in case any vessel 80 arriving shall prefer to import her cargo, thcti such vessel shall be allowed to enter and import the same, upon such terms and conditions aS the said cargo might have been imported upon, ac- cording to law, in case the said vessel had sailed after having received notice of the said order, and in con- formity thereto. And it is further ordered, that all vessels which shall arrive at any port of the united kingdom, or at Gibraltar, or Malta, in conformity and obedience to the said order, shall be allowed, in respect to all ar- ticles which may be onboard the same, xcept sugar, coflee, wine, brandy, snuff, and tobacco, to clear out to amy port whatever, to be specified in such rlenrpr.r-p; and, with respect to the Jast-mentbned articles, to export the same to such ports, and under such con- ditions and regulations only, as his Majesty by any licence to be granted J or that purjiose, may direct. And the right honourable the lords commissioners of his Majesty's treasury, hii Majesty's principal secretaries of state, the lords commissioners of the admiralty, and the judges of the high court ol" admi- ralty and courts of vice- admiralty, arc to take the necessary measures herein as to them may respectivelv appertain. OS W. FAWKENER. hi No. VII. Thifd Order in Coimcil, Nov. 11. 1807. '<! 1 Sl^i \ Whereas the sale of ship3 by « bellig'crent to a neutral is considered by France to be illegal : And whereas a great part of the shipping of Franc* and her allies has been protected from capture" during ihe present hostilites, by transfers, or preterded trans- iers, to neutrals: And whereas it is fully justifiable to adopt the same ^'ide, in this respect, towards the enemy, which is -))plied l)v the enemy to this country. His Majesty is pleased, by and with ne advice of his privy council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, Thai in future the sale to a neutral of any vcp-icl be- longing to his Majesty's enemies, shall not be deemed t.o he legal, nor in any manrer to transfer the pro- perty, nor to alter the character of such vessel : and al] Vfissels. i)ow bi longing, or which shall hereafter .ly enemy of his Majesty's, notwithstanding .c, or pretended sale to a neutral, after a rea- ,Adh\t time shall have elapsed for receiving infonn- ation of this his Majesty's order at the place where "juch sale, or pretended sale, was efleeted, shall be captured and brouglit in, and shall be adjudged as lawful f>vi/e to the captors. A'ad the right honourable the lorda commissioners of his Mijesly's treasury, his majesty's principal irciMlHiles of slate, the lords commissioners of the 85 atliuiiwUy, and the jii Ves <if tlie high court of admi- ralty and courts of vicc-adniiraily, are to take the necessary measures herein as to iheni shall respec- tively appertain. W. FAWKENER. No. VIII. Extract of Instructioirs to Comviatuhrs of Ships of WaVy November 18, 1807. Our will and pleasure is, and we do hereby direct, by and with the advice of our Privy Council, that the commanders of our ships of war and piivateers, do act m due conformity to, and execution of, our aforesaid order in council : And we do further order and declare, that nothing in the said order shall extend, or be construed to extend, to prevent any vessel, not belonging to a country declared to be un- der the restrictions of blockade as aforesaid, from carrying from any port or place of the country to which such vessel belongs, any articles of manufac- ture or produce whatever, not being enemy's pro- perty, to any port or place in this kingdom. No. IX. Additional Instruction to Cruixrrs, IQih Nov, 1807. Our will and pleasure is, that vessels belonging to any state not at war with us, laden \vit!i cargoes in any ports of the united kingdom, and clcariiitr out according to law, shall not be interrupted or'.nolcsted V.li|i I i r '!^! 86 in proceeding to any part in Europe, (except ports specially notified to bcin a state of strict and rigorous blockade before our order of the 1 Itli of November instant, or which shall hereafter be so notified,) to whomsoever the goods laden on board such vessels may appear to belong : And we do furtlier direct, that vessels belonging as aforesaid, coming from any port in Europe, 'except as before excepted,) direct to any port of the united kingdom with goods for im- portation, shall not be interrupted in the said voyag<.-, to whomsoever the o-ootjs laden on board the said vessels may appear to belong : And in case any vessel which shall be met with and asserted by her master to be to coming, siiall be detained on suspicion of not being really destined to this kingdom ; such vessel shall be brought to the most convenient port in the course of her asserted destination, and the captors are hereby required to inquire with all convenient speed into the alleged destination ; and in case any ves- sel and goods so brought in and detained, shall be proceeded against in our High Court of Admiralty or in any courts of Vice-Admir.dty, we hereby direct, that the same shall he forthwith restored upon satis- factory proof bving made that the cargo was coming for importation to a port of this kingdom *. By hii Majesty's command, HAWKESBURY. — ' » ' I I II • These instructions seem to be contrary to the navi- gation law. The courts arc directsd to restore neutral ships detaiued with cargoes from any restricted countries, on proof that they werecomnig for importation here. But U- if ! '11 87 No. X , First addition ' Order, 25th November, 1807. Whereas I'r has been reprcscntel that it wouUl be expedient to fix certain perioils, at winch it shall be deemed that a reasonable time shall h.ive elapseil for receiving information, at dilff-reut places, ot" his Majesty's order in council of the llt!i ol' November instant, respecting the trade with his Majesty's ene- mies, and in their produce and manufactures ; his Majesty taking the same into consideration, and being- desirous to obviate any difficulties that may arise in respect theieto, and also to allow ample time for the said order being known to all pcrsjus, who may be affected thereby, is please.!, by an 1 wirh the advice of his Privy Council, to order and declare, and it is hereby oi'dercd and declared, tliat information of the said order of the 1 Jth of November instant, shall be taken and held to have been received in ihf places herein-after mentioned, at the periods respectively assigned to them ; namely, fi Ports and places within the Baltic — December 21, 1607. the Second Order of Novembrr 1 1, only anfliorizes the imporfa-fioa of goods by nt-utca's from belligerent ports, not from any cfher restrieted ports ; and, as we rim;trkcd before, the order wouhl have been illegal b) the Nav. Act, coupled with IJ Geo. III. c. 163 had it gone any farther. Th«se iiLstraetions are therefore (|inte illeg.d. 88 Other ports and nir'cf s to the northward of Amster-f dam — December i I, IS07. From A.uj8terdam to Ushant — December 4, 180?. From Ushaiit to Cape Finisterre — December 3, 1807. From Cape Finisterre to Gibraltar, inclusive, Dec. 13, 18Q7. Maderia — December 13, I8O7. Ports and places within the Streights of Gibraltar to Sicily and Malta, and the west coast of Italy, inclusive, January 1, 1808. All other ports and places in the Mediterranean be- yond Sicily and Malta, January 20, 1808. Ports and places beyond the Dardanelles — February 1, 1808. Any part of the north and western const of Africa, or the islands adjacent, except Maderia — Jan- uary 1 1, lj.:j8. The Und, I) Sr.Ues, and British possessions in North America ;ind tl)e West Indies — January 20, isos. Cape of Good Hope, and the east coast of South America. ...Marcii 1, ISOS. India.. ..May I, 1808. China, and the coast of South America.. ..June J, 1808. '• And every vessel sailing on or after those days, from tiiose places respectively, shall be deemed and taken to have received notice of the aforesaid order. And it is further ordered, that if any vessel shall sail within twenty days after die periods above assigned [1 I 89 * » -.. cssel shall lU be brought (■(' iSf.L com- ire ihq intoi - .y hern received respectively, from any of the said places, in contra^ vemirii of tho said order of the 1 It'i of November in- stant, md shah be dety,ined as prize on account there- of, or shah arrive at any port in this kingdom, destin- ed to some port or place within the rcstr.iction of the said order, and proof shall be m- ' - to thr '-atisfaction of the court of admiralty, be proceeded against, in case ' ; % in as a prize, that the loadin menced before the said periodb^ mation of the said order had act at the port of shipment, the said vessel, together with the goods so laden, shall be restored tc the owner or owners thereof, and shall be permitted to proceed oa her voyage, in such manner, as ifsuc'i vessel had sail- ed before the day so specified as aforesaid. And it )s further ordered, that no proof shall be admitted, or be gone into, for the purpose of shewing that information of the said order of the 1 1th of No- rember instant had not been received at the said places respectively, at the several periods before assigned. And the right honourable the lords commissioners of his Majesty's treasury, his Majesty's principal se- cretaries of state, the lords commissioners of the admiralty, and tlic judges of the high court of admi- ralty and courts of vice-admiralty, are to take the ne- cessary measures herein as to them respectively ap- pertain. W, FAWKENER, IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) / 1 '« //'W s>- 1.0 ^« I.I If 1^ m li^ 12.5 12.2 M 1.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 « 6" - ► V] v^ ^. c*. c^? J^K^J^ J' /. /A '/ Photographic Sciences Corporation 33 WIST MAIN STRUT WiBSTIRN Y MSSO (716) 873-4S03 ^ 'i^. Q.- m % m \ ^ Mi 90 No. XI. Second additional Order, 2bth November ^ 1*07. ' Wlu-reas his Majesty, by iiis order in council, dated nth November instant, respecting the trade to be carried on with his Majesty's enemies, was pleased to exempt from the restrictions of the said order, ail vessels which shall have cleared out from any port or place in this kingdom, under such rcgwlaiions as hi« Majesty may think fit to pr'^scribe, and shall be pro- ceeding direct to the ports specified in the respective clearances : His Majesty, taking into consideration the expediency of making such regulations, is pleased, by and with the advice of his privy cduncii, to order, and it is hereby ordered. That all vessels belonging to countries not at war with his Maje' ly, shall be p-rmitted to lade, in any port of the united kingdom, any goods being the pro- duce or manufactue of his Majesty's dominions. East India goods, or prize goods (all such goodsthaving been lawfully it7i ported) and to clear out wim and frc^cly to convey the same to any port or place in any colony in the West Indies, or America, belonging to his Majesty's enemies, such port or place not being in a stato of actual blockade ; subject to the payment of such duties as may at the time when any such vessels may be cleared out, be due by law on the cxporta- tion of any Ruch goo<ls, or in respect of Hie same being destined to the ports of the colonies belonging to his Majesty's eneiniei : gl :l9 And likewise to lade, clear out with, and convey as aforesuid, any articles of foreign produce, or ma- nufacture, which shall have been lawfullv imported into this kingdom, provided his Majesty's licence shall jiave been previously obtained for so conveying such foreign produce or manufactures : And it is further ordered, that any vessel belong- ing as aforesaid, shall be permitted to lade in any port of the united kingdom any goods, not being naval or military stores, which shall be of the growth, pro- duce, or manufacture of this kingdom, or whicU shall have been lawfully imported, (save and except foreign suffar, coffee, wine, brandy, snuft, and cotton), and to clear out with, and fteely to convey the same to any port, tobe specilied in the clearance, not being in a state of actual blockade, although the same shall be under the restrictions of the said order : And likewise to lade, clear out, and convoy fo- reign sugar, cofFcc, wine, brandy, snufF, and cotton, which shall have been lawfully imported, provided his Majesty's licence shall have been previously obtained for the exportation and conveyance thereof: And It is hereby further ordered, that no vessel thall be permitted to clear out from any port or place in this kingdom, to any port or place of any country subjecicd to the restrictions of the sjiid order, with any goods which shall have been laden, after notice of the said order, on board the vessel which shall have imported the same into this kingdom, without having fiistduly entered and landed the same in some port or place in this kingdom : And that no vessel shall be permitted lo clear out 1, i m'- »2 from any port or place In this kingdom to any port or place whatever, with any goods the produce or ma- nufacture of any country, subjected to^lhc restrictions of the said order, which sha'l have been laden, after notice as aforesaid on boArd the vessel importing the same, without having so duly entered and landed the same : Or, with any goods whatever which shall hav« been laden, after such notice, in the vessel importing the same, in any port or place of any country' subjected to the restrictions of the said order, without having so dtdy entered, and landed the same, in some port or place in this kingdom : Except the cargo shaH consist wholly of flour, meal, grain, or any article or articles the produce of the soil of some country, which is not subjected to the restrictions of the said order, rxcept cotton, and which shall have been imported in an umnanufactured slate direct from such country into this kingdom, in a vessel belonging to the country f' which such goi;ds have been brought, and in wl Jie same were grown and produced * : And It is further ordered, that any vessel belong- ing to any country not at' war with his Majesty, may clear out from Guernsey, Jersey, or Man, to any port or place under the restrictions of tho said order, which shall be specified in the clearance, not being in a state of actual blockade, with such articles only, not being * \Vu have remarked in tho text tho contradictionii here exhibited, as mcU iw (lie repugnance of this Order to a .subsequent one. 9S naval or military stores, as sl)all have been legally im- ported into such islands respectively, from any port or place in this kingdom direct. And with respect to all such articles as may' have been imported into the said islands respectivehv from any port or place under the restrictions of the said or- der, it shall not be permitted to any ves&cl to clear out with the same from any of the said islands, ex- cept to some port or place In this kiagdom. And the Riffht Honourable the Lords Commis- sioners of his Majesty's Treasury, his Majesty's prin- cipal Secretaries of State, the Lords Conmiissioners of the Admiralty and the Judges of the High Court of Admiralty, and courts of Vice-Admiralty, are to take the necessary measures herein as to them shall respectively appertain, W. FAWKENCp. No. XII. Third Ordar, 25th Novi-mber, 1807. Whereas his M&jesty, by hii order in council dated the 1 1th of November instant, respecting the trade to be carried on with his Maj'jsty's cncinics, was pleased to exempt fron\ the restrictions of ttie said ©rder all vessels belonging to any country not at war with his Majesty, togetht-r with their cargo, wliich shall be coming froni any port or place in Europe, which is declared it) the said order to be subject to the re- strictions incklent to a state of blockad:, direct to some part or place in Kuropc belonging to his Ma- jesty: :il III 9* And also lili vessels which shall be cleared out from Gibraltar or Malta under such regulations as his Majesty may think fit to prescribe, and wiiicli shall bo proceeding direct to the ports specified in their respective clearances : And whereas it is expedient to encourage the trade from Gibraltar to Malta to countries under the re- strictions of the said order, subject to regulations to be mzde respect thereto : His Majesty is therefore pleased to prescribe the following regulations in regard to such (radct accordingly, and by and with the advice of his privy council, to order, and it is hereby or- dered, - That all sorts cf flour and meal, and all sorts of grain^ tobacco, and any other article in an unmanufac- tured state, being the growth and produce of any country not being stibjected by the said order to the restrictions incident to a state a/ bloc/cade, (except cot- ton, and naval and military stor<;s) which shall have been imported into Gibraltar and Malta direct from the country wlieie the same were grown and pro- duced, shall, ivithout any liccni'c, be permitted to be cleared ottt to any port or place, not being in a state of actual blockade, without the same being compelled to be landed : But neither the said article of cotton, however im- ported, nor any article which is nat the growth, pro- duce, or manufacture of this kingdom, or which has not been imported in a British ship, or from this king- dom tlirect (except fish), and which sliall have bcea laden at the port of original shipment, after the pe- riod directed by an order of this date to be taken at 9.5 the timf, at wlikh notice of the said order of the . 1 ith of November shall be considered as havinjr been received at such port of shipment, shall be permitted to be exported from Gibraltar or Malta, except to somep(Jit or place inihis kingdom: ' •» And all other articles of the growth, produce, and manufacture of this kingdom, or which shall hare been imported into Gibraltar or Malta, in a British ' ship, or from some port or place in this kingdom, to* • gether with the article of fish, however imported, may be expoited to any ports or places in the Me- diterranean or Portugal, under such licence only as is herein-after directed to be granted by the governor and Malta respectively — And it is hereby further or- dered, that licences be granted by the governors, lieu- tenant governors, or other persons having the chief civil command at Gibraltar or at Malta respectively, but in his Majesty's name, to such person or per- sons as the said governors, lieutenant governors, or persons having the chief command shall think fit, allowing such person or persons to export from Gi- braltar direct, to any port in the Mediterranean, or to any port of Portugal, or to any port of Spain without the Mediterranean, not further north than Cape Fi- nisterre, and from Malta direct to any port being with- in the Mediterranean, with any articles of the pro- duce or manufacture of his Majesty's dominions : And any articles whiih shall have been imported into Gibraltar or Malta from this kingdom, to whomsoever such articles shall appear to belong, (not being naval or military stores) in any vessel belonging to any counw try not ut war with his Majoi»ty, or in any vessel not I » 5 II P6 exceeding one hundred tuns burthen, and being Uti- armed, belonging to the country to which such ves- sel shall be cleared out and going : And also to import in any such vessel or vessels as aforesaid, from any port within fhe Mediterranean, to Gibraltar or Malta, or from an}/ port in Portugal or Spain as aforesaid, to Gibraltar, such port and such destination respectively to be specified in such licence, amj articles nf merchandise whaf soever, and to whom- soever the same may appear to belong, such articles to be specified in the bill of lading of such vessel, sub- ject however to such further regulations and restrict- tions with respect to all or any of the said articles so to be imported, or exported, as may be inserted in the said licences by the governors, lieutenant governors, or other persons having the chief civil command at Gibraltar or Malta, for the time being respecdvelj^ as to them shall, from time to time, seem fit and expe- dient. And it is furtlicr ordered, that in every such licence shall be inserted the names and residence of the per- son or persons, to whom it shall be granted, the ar- ticles and their quantities permitted to be exported, the name and description of the vessel, and of the master thereof, the port to which the vessel shall- be allowed to go, which shall be some port not under ac- tual blockade, and that no'jicence so to be granted shall continue in force for longer than two months from its date, nor for more than one voyage, or any such licence be granted, or acknowledged to be valid, if granted to permit the clearance of any vessel to any ^( ir 1! 97 *( . v port, which shall be actually blockaded by any naval ' force of his Majesty or of his allies : And it is further ordered, that the tiers of commanui his Majesty's ships of war and privateers, and all others whom it may concern, shall suffer every such vessel sailing conformably to the permission given by this order, or having any licence as aforesaid, to pass and repass, direct between Gibraltar, or Malta, and such port as shall be specified in the licence, in such manner, and under such- terms, regulations, and re- •trictions as shall be expressed therein. And it is furtlicr ordered, that, in case any vessel, so sailing as aforesaid, for which any such licence as aforesaid shall have been granted, and which shall be proceeding direct upon her said voyage, shall be de- tained and brought in for legal adjudication, such vcs- iel, with her cargo, shall be forthwith released by the Comt of Admiralty, in which proceedings shall be commenced, upon proof being made that ihe parties had duly conformed to the terms, regulations, and re- strictions of the said licence ; the proof of such con- formity to lie upon the person -"^ persons claiming the benefit of this order, or cbtaihiig or using sucia licence, or clai ning the benefit thereof. And it is hereby further ordered, that no vessel bo. longing to any state on the coast of Barbary, shall be prevented from sailing with any ait'.cles of the growth or produce of such state, from any port or place in such state, to any port or place in the Mediterra^ nean, or Portugal, such port or place not being actually blockaded by some naval force belonging to his niajes- 9» ty, or his allies, without being obliged to touch at Gibraltar or Malta. And the Right Honourable tlic Lords Commis- sioners of his Majesty's Treasury, his Majesty's Prin- cipal Secretaries of State, the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, and the Judges of the High Court of Admiralty and Courts of Vice-Admiralty, are to take the necessary measures herein, as to them shall res- pectively appertain. W. FAWKENER. , No. X III. Fourth Additional Order, Nov. 25, I80I. tVhereas his Majetsy, by his order in council of the eleventh of November instant, was pleased to order and declare, that all trade in articles which are of the produce or manufacture of the countries and colonics mentioned in the said order, shall be deemed and con- fidered to be unlawful (except as is therein excepted) ; his Majesty, by and with the advice of his privy council is pleased to order and declare, and it is here- by ordered and declared, tliat nothing in the said order contained shall extend to subject, to capture and con- fiscation any ar tides of the produce and manufacture of the said countries and colonies laden on hoard Bri' tish shipi>t which would not have been subject to capture and confiscation if such order had not been made. And the right honorable the lords commissioners of bis Majesty's treasury, his Majestys principal fee- cretaries of state, the lords commissioners of th« 1 I m admiralty, r.ncl the judges of the high court ofadmi- rtih) and vice admiialty are to take tlie necessary mt^asures herein, as to them may respectively apper- tain. W. FAWKENER. • No. XIV. . Fiflh Additional Order in Council^ 25th November 1807. His Majesty taking into consideration the circum- stances under wliich Prussia and Lubeck have been compelled to shut their ports against British ships anci goods, is pleased, by and with the advice of his privy council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, that all ships and goods belonging to Prussia, which may have been seized subsequent to his Majesty's order, of the nineteenth of November one thousand eight hundred and six, and are now detained in the ports of this kingdom, or elsewhere, and all ships and goods be- longin<r to inhabitants of Lubeck wliich arc so de- tained, shall be restored upon being pronounced by the high court of admiralty, or any court of vice- admiralty, in which they have been or may be pro- ceeded anjainst, to belong to subjects and inhabitants of Piussia or Lubeck *, and not otherwise liable to ' confiscatiJrf ; and that such ships and goods shall be permitted to proceed to any neutral port, or to the port to which they respectively belong : And it is further ordered, that the ships and goods belonging to * On I20th December, 1807, Lubeck property was di- rect not to be restored till further orders. ii 2 100 Prussia or Lubeck shall not, until further orders, be liable to detention, provided such ships and goods shall be trading to or from any port of this kingdom, or between neutral port and neutral port, or from any port of his Majesty's allies, and proceeding direct to the port specified in their respective clear- ances. And the right honourable the lords commissioners of his Majesty's treasury, his Majesty's principal se- cretaries of state, tlic lords commissioners of the admiralty, and the judges of the high court of ad- miralty and courts of vice admiralty, are to take the necessary measures herein, as to them shall respec- tively appertain. W. FAWKENER* No. XV. iiixth Additional Order in Cou7ia'i, 25 1 h November t U07. His Majesty having taken into consideration the circumstances under which Portugal has been com- pelled lO shut her ports against the ships and goods of his Majesty's subjects, is pleased, by and with the advice of his privy council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, that all ships and goods lelonging to Por- tugal, which have been, and are now detained in the ports of this kingdom, or elsewhere, shall be restored, upon being pronounced, by the high court of admi- ralty, or by the court of vice-admiralty, in which pro- ceedings may have been, or shall be commenced, to 101 belong to subjects and inhabitants of Portugal, and not otherwise liable to confiscation ; and that the said •hips and goods shall be permitted to proceed to any neutral port, or to Portugal : And it is further ordered, that the ships and goods belonging to Portugal shall not, until further orders, be liable to detention j pro- vided such ships and goods shall be trading to and from any port of this kingdom, or to and fromGibral- tar or Malta, and proceeding direct to tiie port spe» ciiied in iheir clearance, or between neutral port and neutral port, or between Portugal and the ports of her own colonies, or fiom any poit of his Maj -.ty's alics and proceeding direct to the ports specified in their respective clearances ; provided such ports shall not be at the time in a state of actual blockade : And it is further ordered, that the ships of Portugal shall not be considered as entitled, under any treaty be- tween his Majesty and Portugal, to protect any good» laden therein which may be otherwise subject to co»- fiscation. And the ritrht honorable the lord* commlsionert of his Majesty's treasury, his Majesty's principal se- cretaijes of state, the lords comuiissioncrs'of the ad- miralty; and the judges of the high court of admi- ralty, and courts of vice-admiralty, are to take the nf ccssary measures herein as to them shall rcipec- tively appertain. W. FAWKENER. Ill rj'li iil 102 No. XVI. ' Order of Council, Dec, 25, l807. 1 His Majesty is pleased, by and with the advice of his privy council, to order, and it is hereby orderedj, that nothing in his Majesty's order in council of the 11th of November last shall extend, or be construed to extend, to permit any vessel to import any article! of the produce or manufacture of the enemy's colonic* in the West Indies, direct from such colonies to any port of this kingdom : And it is further ordered, that all vessels which may arrive in the ports of this king- dom direct from the colonies aforesaid, shall never- theless be released, upon proof being made that the charter-party or other agreement for the voyage was entered into before notice of this order. And the right honourable the lords commlsfloners of hlu Majesty's treasury, his Majesty's principal secretaries of slate, the lords commissioners of the admiralty, and the judges of the high court of admiralty, and the courts of vice admiralty, are to take the necessary measures herein, as to them shall respectively ap- pertain. W. FAWKENER. !.;!: \.i m 103 m- No. XVII. Lord Cokt's Commentary o% MAGNA CHARTA. That before this statute, merchaiit-strangors might be publiqucly prohibited, publice prohibeantur. And this prohibition is intendable of merchat strangers in •ftmitie, for this act provideth afterward for merchant ftrangcrs enemies ; and therefore the prohibition in- tended by this act,«must be by the common or pub- lique c<^/dncell of the reahne, that is, by act of parHa- ment, tor that it concerneth the whole rcalme, and is implyed by this word (publice.) ' Now touching merchant strangefl, whose love- Tuigne is in warre with the King of England. There is an exception, and provision for such, as be found in the reahne at the beginning of the warre, they shall be attached with a privilcdge, and liniita- tiqn, viz. without harme of body, oi goods, with this limitation, untill it be knownc to us, or our chiefc justice (that is our guardien, or keeper of the realnie in o»ir absence) how our merdumts there in the'land in warre with us shall be intrcated, and if our merchants be well intrealed there, theirs shall be likewise with us, and this iiii jus belli. Et in re- publica maxino conservauda sunt juri belli. But for such merchant etratigers as come into the rea!n>e after the warre beginnc, they may be dealt wiihall as open rnemies: and yet of auncient lime three men had privilcdge granted thcni in lime p %?'■. 104 warre. Clerlcus, agricola, et mercator, tempore belli. Ut oretq ; colat, commutet, pace fruuntur. The end of this chapter was for advancement of trade, and traffique ; the meanes for the well using and intreating of merchant strangers in all the parti- culars aforesaid, is a matter of great moment, as ap- peareth by many other acts of parliament, for as they be used here, so our merchants shall be dealt withall in other countries. King Philip and Queen Mary, graunted by letters patents to the mayor,baylifrcs, and burgesses of South- ampton, and their successors, that no wines called malmeseys to be imported into this realme by any denizen, or alien, should be discharged or landed at any other place within this realme, but onely at the said town and port of Southampton, with a prohibi- tion, that none should doe to the contrary upon pain to pay treble customc to the King and queen, &c. And for that Anthony Donate, Thomas Frcderice, and other merchant strangers bought divers buts of Hjalnicsey, &c. and landed them at Goorc, and in Kent, Gilbert Gerard the attournfy gcncrall, informed in the exchequer, against the said merchant strangers for the said treble customc, &c. Upon which in- formation, as to the said treble customc, the said Anthony Donat demurred in law, he. And this ca&€ was argued in the exchequer chamber by coun- scU learned on both sides, and upon conference had, two points were resolved by all the judges. I. That the grant made in restraint of landing of the said whies was a restraint of the liberty of the subject, against the lawcs and statutes of the realme. S ♦ That n il! 103 the assessment of treble custome was merely void, and against the law. As it appeareth by the report of the lord Dier under his hand (which I have in my custody) But after by act of parliament, in anno 5 Eliz. the said charter is established as to merchant strangers oncly, but not against subjects, (ii. Inst. 47.) No. xviiir. . ;'■/' Magna Charta. (9 Hen. III. cap. iO.J ' Omnes mercatores nisi publice antea prohibit! fue*- rint habcant salvum & securum conductum exire de Angl. & venire in Angl. & morari 8c ire per Angl. tarn per terram quani per aquam ad emend. & ven- dend. sine omui'ous tollis malis per antiquas & rectas consuetudincs prelerquam in tempore guerre & si sint de terra contra nos gucrrina & talis inveniantur in terra nostra in principio guerre attachientur sine damno corporum vel rerum donee sciatur a nobis vel a capitali Justic. nostro quomodo Mercatores terre nostre trac- tantur qui tunc invcnivuitur in terra ilia contra no» quirrina &c si nostri salvi sint in terra nostra. No. XIX. C Ed- IlL Stat. 1. cap. 1.^1 and f. That all merchant strangers, and denizens, and all other and every of them, of what condition or state loevcr they be, that will buy or sell corn, wines, aver I I t i i 106 ^epoiSf flesh, fish, and all other livings and victuals, wools, clothes, wares, mcrchandiees, and all other, things vendible, from whence soever they come, by foreigners or denizens, at what place soever it be, cit}', borough, town, port of the sea, fait, market, or elsewhere, within the realm, within franchise or with- out, may freely, without interruption sell them to what persons it shall please them, as well to foreigners as denizens ; except always the enemies of our Lord the King and his^ realm. And if haply any disturb- ance be done to any merchant stranger, or denizen, nr any other, for the sale of such thingSj, in any city, borough, town, port of the sea, or other place which hath franchise, and the mayors and bailiffs, or other which hath the rule of such franchise, bcinjr re- quired by the said merchants, or other thereof to pro- ride remedy, and do not and be thereof attained, the franchise shall be seized into the king's hands, £19^ * Ko. XX. 11 Ell III. Stat. 2. rap. 2. § f . Tliat all merchants, denizens, and foreigners, (cx- eept those which be of our enmity) may without let safely come into the said rcahn of Kiigland with their goods and mcrcjiandizcs, and safely tarry and safely return, payinp^ the customs subsidies and other profits reasonably thereof due; so always that franchises and iiFe<> nistomi, reasonably granted by us and our a»- ior fjcstori to the city of London, and other cities, boroughs, and good towns of our lealtn of England^ |>e to them saved. - t- No. XXI. 1 8. Ed. III. Stat. 2. c. 3. § 9. And that everj man, as well stranger ai privy ^ from henceforth may buy wools, according as they may a^ree with the seller, as they were wont to do before the said ordinances ; and that the sea be open to all manner of merchants to pass with their mer- chandise uhere it shall please them^ (qe la mieer soit fiverte a tout manere des marchantz dt passer over lour marchandises.) ' ■ ' ' ■ No. XXII. 25 E</. Iir. Stat. 4. c. § 4. That every merchant or other, of what condition ht be, as well alien as denizen, that bring wines, ilesh, fish, or other victuals, cloths, woolfcls, Avoir de poiSf or any other manner of mcrcliandizes, or chaffer to the city of London^ or other cities, boroughs, and good towns of England, or ports of the sea, may freely and without challenge or impeachment of any, sell in gross or at retail, or by parcels at hit will, to all mtn- lOS ncr of people that will buy the same, notwithstaad- ing any franchises, grants, or custom used, or any other things clone to the contrary; sithence that such usages and franchises be to the common prejudice of th« king and his people. No. XXIII. 21 Ed, III. siat. 2. cap, 2. I/!! Item pur rcplener lez ditx Roialmcs et terres de ftionei et de plat dor et dargent et dez merchandizes dez autres terres, ct pur doner tarlent as marchauntez estmunges de venir ove Icz mcrcez et marchandiset de autres terres en lez iioialme & terres avauntditz. Si avoins ordeigne & cstabli, que touts lez marchaunto estrunges,queux ne sount myc de notre enaiite, dc quel tcrre ou nation qils soicnt puissent soutz nostre pro- tection, ct save conduit vencr et demurrer en nos dit Roialme et terrez, queux parties, qils voudrount, ct de illocqs retourner ove lour mesnce mcrces ct mur- chauudises quccunqes fraunchcment ct vendre lour tiiarchciundiies a lez estaples &c aillours dcinz mesmc) le Roialme & terres, a que lez voudra achater paiauntcs les custumes ent deuz. Et pur plus assurcrc lez mar- chauntz cstraunges et autres niesnauntos liens & marchaundises es ditcs Koialme tt terres j hi voloinis Ife grautitoms ordcinoms* J 09 TRANSL AXIOM. Item, for the better replenishing of 'these fea!m% >vith money, gold and silver plate^ and merchandize of foreign countries, and for giving to merchant strangers inducements to come with the wares and merchandize of foreign countries into these realms aforesaid — We have ordained and established that all tnerchant strangers who are not at ejimity with u$ of xi'hat coiL7itry or nation whatsoever, may undercut protection and safe conduct come and tarry in our realms aforesaid, wheresoever they chuse, and frona thence may return with their imported wares and inerchandize freely, and sell the same at the staples and elsewhere, &c. . .. \ No. XXIV, t :t r \6 :8 r- i) in 2d liich. II. Stat. 1. f. 1. §4. Our Lord the King considering clearly the coming of mercliant strangers within the realm, to be very profitable for many causes, to all the realm, by the assent of the prelates, dukes, earls, barons, and of the commons of the realm, hath ordained and stab- lished, that all nurchanis aliens, of what realms, countries, or seignories that they come, which be of the amity of the King, and of hU realm, may from ioi heticcfortli safely ami surely come wltliin the realm of England, and in all cities, boroughs, ports of thfr sea, fairs, markets, or other places iV^ithin the realm^ within franchise and without, and abide with their goods and all merchandizes under the safeguard and protection of the king, as long as shall please him,- without disturbance or denying of any person.* "I ■I j i No. XXV. 4 Sic. 11. sL 2. c. 1. s. 1 and 2. That all manner of merchant strangers, of whatso-' ever nation or country they be, being of the amity of the King and of his realme, shall be welcome, and freely may come within the realm of England, and * The three last statutes completely prove that the ex- ception in some of the former ones " of the kings cncmici^^ mcanf either rebels and foes within the realm, or is to be interpreted as shewing who are }iot to come and sell here—not Jis prohibiting merchant strangers at amity from wiling to all — foes as well as friends. — Evan if it were pretended that those statutes meant to prohibit the trade of alien friends with alien enemies, it would remain for the defenders of ths latJ Orders to shew that all the restricted countries are those of alien enemies, or to ad- mit that at least in part those orders arc quite illegal. But no such interpretation can be set up, nor is it sup^ ported by a single law authority. — See Comj/ns, 332. — 2 Itibt, b7.—Bac, Ab. Merchant, Ill elsewhere within the King's power, as well within franchise as without, and there to be conversant to ' merchandize, and tarry as long as them liketh, as those whom our said lord the King by the tenor hereof, taketh under his protection and safeguard, with their good*, merchandizes, and all manner fami- liara. And for so much the King willeth and com- mandeth, That they and every of them be well, friendly, and merehantlike entreated and demeaned within all parts within his said realm and power, with their merchandizes, and all manner goods, and suffered to go and come, and into their proper country peaceably to return without disturbance or impeach- ment of any. he No. XXVI. $ Hen. IV. cap. 7. s.1. Item, It is ordained and established, that all the merchant sttangers, of what estate or condition that they be, coming, dwelling, or repairing within the realm of England, shall be entreated or demeaned within the realm in the manner, form, and condition, as the merchants denizen? be, or shall be entreated or demeaned in the parts beyond tht tea. I hi' ; ■■J ' » • ■j 1 -l .' i r f 1 '> }'■ t- A TF i 112 No. xxvir. Extract fro n Lord C. J". Hales Treatise De Vortilas Maris." For general prohibitions of nerchandlzes of any particular kind. These were sometimes made, but very rarely j neither indeed could they be lawful with- out the help of an act of parliament, because there have been in all times several statute* made for the liberty and encouragement of merchant strangers especially to come into the kingdom and trade, which could not be derogated by a proclamation. And therefore, if at any time there were such inhibi- tions by proclamation, they were commonly tempo- rary upon an exigence of state, and not perpetual, nor of any certain continuance. But when there were perpetual or long restraints of this nature, they were always done by parliament. And the reasons of these mterposings of acts of parliament was, because that proclamations proved very inefieclual to that purpose, partly because it was at best doubtfuU whether they could at all be effeotual against so manie acts of parliament ; but doubtless they could not without an act of parliament induce a forfeiture of the goods so imported, as hath been often resolved ; whereof more hereafter. Concerning cxportations, and how far forth the ports may be shut in reference to goods and mer- chandizc exported. Those inhibitions were for the most part touching such commodities whereby the kingdom might be weakened, or scarcity occasioned, by the exportation ; as arms, ammunition, corn, victuals, gold, silver, of shi} trade 25. of iaeficct 113 liorses, tinioer, thread of yarn, of woollen, and some- times of falcons. And sometimes m the proclamation there was' an- nexed a clause of imprisonment of offenders ; some- times the forfeiture of the things imported ; some- times the forfeiture of all their goods and lands. But these clauses of forfeiture were only in fenorem t for, as wc have before observed, a proclamation barely cannot induce a forfeiture of goods. Though possibly in the time of hostility or public, danger, or common scarcit)-, such prohibitions by proclamation of exportation of victuals and arms might have a temporary efFect and use ; yet we may easily guess that they were not effectual for perpe- tuity, nor indeed sufficient provisions pro icmpore; for the kino; and his council tlioun-ht not fit to rest upon such inofTeclual means, but acts of parliament liave successively passed for the inhibition of expor- tation of these very things with penalties of for- feitures added to them. Sec i E. 4. c. 5. for horses 1 E. 2. P. IM. c. .b, of corn, herring, butter, cheese, and wood ; '25 FL 9, c. 5. of victuals of all sorts ; 9 E. 3. c. 1.19 11. 7. c. 15, of bullion or money. The like might be instanced in divers other things. The restraints of exportation in any but English bottoms. This hath been attempted to be done bv proclamation, as a good expedient for the increase of shipping and mariners, and the encouragement of trade and navigation. Vide inde clau)!. il V..3. m. 25. of a proclamation to that purpose ; but it proved ineffectual, till provision was made for it by acts, of I 114 parliamciu, viz. 5 R. 2. c. 3. — 6 R. 2. c. 8. — 14 R. 2. c. — 4 H. 7. c. 10. But because it provoked foteign princes to do the like, it was tepealed by the statute } Eliz. c. 13. with certain provisions made in the case oy that statute and the statutes of 5 Eliz. c. 5. and 13 Eliz. c. 13 But now by a late act of parlia- ment, 12 Car. 2. entitled, "An act for encouraging of navigation," the use of foreign ships is in a g cat measure restrained. And upon the whole matter it will appear ^v:^ca the several acts of parliament that have been made ror the support and increase of trade, and for the keeping of the sea open to foreign and English merchants and merchandise, that there Is now no other means for the restraint of exportation or importatiou of goods and merchandises in times of peace, but only when and where an act of parliament puts any restraint. Several Juts of parliament having provided guela^nere soil' overt, it may not be regularly shut against the merchandise of Erglish, or foreigners in amity with this crown, unless an act of parliament shut it out, as it hath been done in some particular cases, and may be done in others. (De Port. Mar, Pi, II. Cap. 8.J <' SJtowtT, Printer, Paternosar Ilew voiced ay the ade in I.e. 5. parlia- raginr great m the tor the )ing of ts and ans for goods whea itraint. la^nere list the y with it out, nd may , B.J 702692: u- '■-5.^