^, 
 
 ^f^f. 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 A 
 
 W 
 
 
 ^ A 
 
 ^\ 
 
 
 
 4^ 
 
 "% 
 
 1.0 
 
 !.l 
 
 150 ^^^ III^HI 
 
 ■^« Uii 12.2 
 
 14.0 
 
 11-25 nil 1.4 
 
 
 -1 
 
 Hiotographic 
 
 Sdfaices 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WIST MAIN STRIET 
 
 WlltSTIR.N.Y. MStO 
 
 (716)I72-4S03 
 
4^ 
 
 -1 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian da microraproductions historiquas 
 
T«chnict*l and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniquas at bibliographiquas 
 
 The Instituta haa attamptad to obtain tha bast 
 original copy availabia for filming. Faaturas of this 
 copy which may ba bibliographically uniqua. 
 which may altar any of tha images in tha 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 Q 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 Couverture endommagie 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur^a et/ou pellicul6e 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiquas en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Ti^ht binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La re liure serr6e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intirieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans la texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 filmias. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires; 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm* le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a iti possible de se procurer. Les details 
 da cat exemplaire qui sont peut-Ctre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique. qui pauvent modifier 
 une image reprortuite. ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mAthode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquAs ci-dessous. 
 
 I I Coloured pages/ 
 
 Paqns de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagtes 
 
 Pages restored and^oi 
 
 Pages restaurias et/ou pelliculAes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxe< 
 Pages d^color^es, tacheties ou piqu6es 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d^tachdes 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Qualiti indgala de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary matarii 
 Comprend du material supplimentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Mition disponible 
 
 I I Pages damaged/ 
 
 I I Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 r^ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 I I Pages detached/ 
 
 r~7| Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 I I Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 I I Only edition available/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiallement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 filmdes A nouveau de fapon d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film* au taux de reduction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 
 
 22X 
 
 J 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 n 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmad hare has b««n r«produc«d thanks 
 to the ganarosity off: 
 
 Library of tha Public 
 Archivas of Canada 
 
 L'axamplaira filmA fut raproduit grAca A la 
 gAntrositii da: 
 
 La bibliothdque das Archives 
 publiques du Canada 
 
 The imagea appearing here are the best quellty 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 off the origlnel copy and In keeping with the 
 ffiiming contrect specifflcations. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are ffllmed 
 beginning with the ffront cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or Illustrated Impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are ffllmed beginning on the 
 fflrst page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded fframe on each microfficha 
 shall contain the symbol -^(meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc.. may be ffllmed at 
 difffferent reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are ffllmed 
 beginning in the upper lefft hand corner, lefft to 
 right and top to bottom, aa many frames as 
 required. The ffollowing diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6tA reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin. compta tenu de la condition at 
 da la nattet* de rexemplaire film6, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 fllmage. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimie sont ffiim6s en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 darnlAre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'Impresslon ou d'illustratlon, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont ffllmfo en commen^ant par la 
 premiere page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'Impresslon ou d'iiiustration et en terminant par 
 la darnlAre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un dee symboles suivants apparaftra sur la 
 darnlAre image de cheque microfficha. salon le 
 cas: le symbole -^> signiffle "A SUIVRE '. le 
 symbols V signiffle "FIN". 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc.. peuvent Atre 
 ffilmAs A des taux de reduction dIfffArents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul cllchA. 11 est film* A partir 
 de i'angle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite. 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'Images nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 lllustrent la mAthoda. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 :. 1 ,. 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 [ ^ 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
ANSWER AND REMONSTRANCE If 
 
 Oi' TIIF. 
 
 mtxitm lekpaph €i0mptt| 
 
 TO THE 
 
 M E M K I A L 
 
 OF THE 
 
 4-^ 
 
 ag««ti( ieUgaph €«mpttg. 
 
 AND THE 
 
 NEW ENGUND UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, k^ 
 
 If 
 
 APRIL 20, 1858 
 
ANSWER AND REMONSTRANCE. 
 
 To THE Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
 States of America, in Conouess assembled. 
 
 The answer and remonstrance of the American Telegraph Com- 
 pany, to the " Memorial " of the Magnetic Telegraph Company, 
 and the New England Union Telegraph Company, and the supple- 
 ment thereto, which memorial bears date, March 10th, 1858, and 
 is signed by Amos Kendall and others. Committee, <fec., respect- 
 fully represents : 
 
 That said memorial prays for the passage " of a general law 
 " which shall prevent combinations between citizens or companies 
 " in the United States, and monopolists or companies out of the 
 " United States, for the purpose of oppressing Telegraph Compa- 
 " nies and monopolizing the business of telegraphing in the United 
 " States, and shall enable all telegraph lines in the United States 
 " to form connections with all telegraph lines approaching their 
 " borders, on terms of perfect equality." 
 
 Your remonstrants find it difScalt to believe that Congress 
 could, in any event, be induced seriously to contemplate the pass- 
 age of such a law, striking as it would, without cause, at the or- 
 dinary business arrangements of companies acting under, and 
 amenable to the laws of the States or Governments by which they 
 »re created ; and as your remonstrants believe, interfering unne- 
 cessarily, to embarrass communication with other countries, to dis- 
 courage enterprise, and to give to one the fruits of the labor and 
 expenditure of another. 
 
Your remonstrants hf'g leave to submit tlio following reasons 
 against tlie ])assjigo of such a law. 
 
 It is asked for by tivo only of the ten or twelve leading Telegraph 
 Companies of the Unite<l States. 
 
 The grievance complained of is, that the pecuniary interests of 
 tlicse two crviupanies are not to bo benefited to the extent tliey 
 liad anticipated, in the event of the successful completion of the 
 Atlantic Telegraph ; while it is a fact that the meniorialiste, 
 though repeatedly invited, have refused to contribute any part of 
 the capital required for such Atlantic Telegraph, but on the con- 
 trary have oj)posed the enterprise before Congress, and through the 
 public presses under their control, as well covertly as openly. 
 
 Tlie injustice of such a law will be apparent when it is considered 
 that parties, who by the expenditure of millions in an undertaking 
 of the greatest hazard, should establish communication from the 
 political or commercial capital of the United States to Europe, 
 would find themselves compelled, in the event of success, to turn 
 over at the frontier an equal share of the business to those who 
 had incurred no risk, who might be wholly irresponsible, and who 
 could perform the service only in a most inferior manner, without 
 forfeiting their claim to equal consideration with the best. 
 
 It is worthy of consideration also whether a Telegraph Company 
 receiving important dispatches in a foreign country for transmission 
 to Washijigton, or to New- York, and transferring them at the 
 frontier to another, in whose hands they should be delayed, altered^ 
 or lost, would not be held responsible for the damage resulting 
 from such delay, error or loss, and be themselves without remedy. 
 
 And if it be proper that telegraph lines crossing the boundary 
 of the United States should be compelled to transfer at that point 
 to other parties a portion or all of the dispatches which are des- 
 tined for places in the United States, it would appear to be within 
 the province of each State through which telegraph lines may 
 run, to make a like provision relative to all lines approaching their 
 borders. 
 
 If such a law be proper in relation to telegraph lines, it would 
 
3 
 
 he equally so if .applied to niilroa<l, steamboat, express and trans- 
 portation companies. 
 
 The law souijht by the memorialists is desiojned solely for their 
 benefit, all of the other leadintr teleujraph companies of this (ron- 
 tinent being entirely satisfied with their arrangements for connec- 
 tion with the Atlantic line. 
 
 It would, therefore, thouj^h professing to be general in its char- 
 acter, liave the most obnoxious features of special legislation. 
 
 Although the memorialists profess to be prompted only by a 
 desire to share in the business coming over the Atlantic line, they 
 ask for a law which would equally embarrass communication with 
 Canada or the other British Provinces, or with Cuba or Mexico. 
 
 The law sought for would interfere with contracts that have been 
 in force for many years between Telegraph Companies, the pro- 
 priety of which has never been called in question, and for some of 
 which valuable considerations have been given. 
 
 Your remonstrants do not comprehend why such a law should 
 be made applicable to telegraph lines approaching the hnrders of 
 the United States, any more than to those which are wholly within 
 the United States ; and yet the memorialists admit in said memo , 
 rial that they have " combined together for mutual defence for 
 thirty years, and made contracts of the same duration with other 
 parties." 
 
 The business of telegraphing has hitherto been left to private 
 enterprise, and to the regulation of the several States ; can it now 
 be transferred constitutionally to the jurisdiction of the General 
 Government ? A provision of the Constitution confers upon Con- 
 gress the authority " to regulate commerce with foreign nations 
 and among the several States." Does the word *' commerce," for 
 which the memorialists have strangely substituted the terms " trade 
 and intercourse," apply to telegraphing ? 
 
 But if, in the wisdom of Congress, it should be determined that 
 they have the power, under this or any other provision of the Con. 
 stitution to legislate upon this subject, your remonstrants respect- 
 fully submit that no sufficient cause for the exercise of this power 
 
ts 
 
 has boen ahown ; iin<l that Iho effect of such an application of it as 
 the memorialists HCck, would not only be of no benefit to the com- 
 munity at large, but an absolute injury to their interests. 
 
 Havini^r presented some of the considi^rations opposed to the 
 passai^e of such a law as is sought in the prayer of the memo- 
 rialists, your remonstrants beg leave to reply to the more promi- 
 nent charges and representations of said memorial, omitting, how- 
 ever, to notice mucdi that is irrelevant, but to all of which they 
 declare their ability to present a complete answer. 
 
 The principal charge of the memorialists is that your remon- 
 strants have entered into a combination with the New- York, New 
 foundland and Ltmdou Telegraph Company, and the Atbmtic Tele- 
 graph Company, and have made arrangements, the object of which 
 is to use the power anticipated from the control over the Trans- 
 Atlantic correspondeiiee, for the injury, and if practicable, the de- 
 struction of the lines of the memorialists. 
 
 Your remonstrants aver, and are prepared to prove, that the 
 only ground whatever for the charge of combination, above-men- 
 tioned, is the fact, that having the only lines extending east from 
 Boston and to Nova Scotia, your remonstrants have entered into 
 contract w'th the Newfoundland Telegraph Company for an inter- 
 change of messages ; and upon condition of receiving from said 
 Newfoundland Company all of the dispatches it may have for 
 transmission westwardly, your remonstrants have agreed to for- 
 ward dispatches between Nova Scotia and New-York at rates sixty- 
 five per cent, lower, the difference in distance being taken into 
 account, than those charged upon the lines owned by the memo- 
 rialists between Washinirton and Boston. 
 
 No other contraQt or understanding whatever exists, or has ever 
 existed, between your remonstrants and either the Newfoundland 
 or Atlantic Companies. 
 
 The contract above-mentioned is precisely similar to those which 
 have been for many years almost universal between the telegraph 
 lines in the United States, and is much less a " combination" than 
 that admitted in said memorial to exist between the memorialists 
 
themselves, wherein they have "c-onihined tonrother for niutuftl 
 protection for thirty years, and have nmdo contracts of the same 
 duration, for conn(!ction with otiior lines." 
 
 Such exclusive connection has existed for more than ton years 
 past, between tlio two companies unitinir in said memorial. 
 
 Previous to any arrangement being made between the New- 
 foundland and the American Companies, an agreement was entered 
 into conditionally by the former with one of the memorialists, 
 the New England Union Telegraph Company, in which it was 
 agreed that an exclusive connection sliould exist between tliose 
 companies for twenty years, with the further obnoxious provision — 
 
 {Extract from the contract, dated May 9, 1865,) 
 
 " That the Newfoundland Company shall exert themselves, to 
 connect with the New England Union Line, at Boston, so that all 
 business from and to Europe shall (tome first to, or start last from 
 New-York, over the lines of the New England Union Company." 
 
 By this arrangement, all messages coming froia Europe for 
 Boston, or any other place east of N^w-York, were first to be 
 transmitted to New- York, and thence returned to the place of 
 their destination — thus securing to the New England Union Com- 
 pany double tolls; and in like manner, every message from Boston 
 or other places in New England, destined for Europe, was to be 
 first sent to New- York, and thence forwarded to Europe. This 
 agreement was cancelled by notice which the Newfoundland Com- 
 pany had reserved the right to give. Tf this contract had con- 
 tinued in force, it is not probable the New England Union Com- 
 pany would havti made any complaints of the impropriety of ex- 
 clusive connection with the Newfoundland Company ; and the 
 Magnetic Company, the other memorialist, between whom and the 
 New England Union Company an exclusive combination exists, and 
 who would, therefore, have enjoyed a portion of the advantages, 
 appeared to see no objection to such connection. 
 
 Said Magnetic Company has always maintained its right to con- 
 nect with such liiK^s as it pleased, and at this time refuses to re- 
 
6 
 
 turn to the Waslnnj/tori and New- York " Hoiimj" line any incssnges 
 from the W.-ishington and New Orleans lino whic^i is under its 
 control. 
 
 'J'hey have jilso for many years refused to accede to the demand 
 of the Baltimore anil Whecliiif? line, that dispatches from Wash- 
 injrton, or points south thereof, destined for Cincinnati, Louisville, 
 St. Louis, and other points, should be forwarded from Baltimore 
 by that line ; and have connected exclusively for tlie West with 
 lines leading' from l'hiladelj)lua, via .l'ittsburi,'h — altliouu^h the for- 
 mer was the most direct route, and, as its proprietors claimed, was 
 entitled to such business by the terms of the conveyance of patent 
 received from Prof. Morse through the gentleman who stands at 
 the head of the memorialists. 
 
 The gentleman most prominent among the memorialists in be- 
 half of the New England Union Telegraph Company — who owns 
 more than one-half of its stock, ta\d who formerly owned most of 
 the line between Boston, Mass., and Portland, Maine, then the only 
 15ne betvreen those points — took the responsibility, for purposes of 
 his own, of refusing to allow the transmission over said line of any 
 messages whatever coming from, or destined to pass over, the lines 
 in the Province of Nova Scotia ; and continued in this high-handed 
 manner to embarrass communication with that Province, until other 
 parties, to whom your remonstrants have succeeded, bought said 
 line of liim on his own terms. 
 
 As further evidence that the complaints of the memorialists are 
 not founded in the sincere belief that the arrangements of your 
 remonstrants for connection with the Newfoundland Company, or 
 with companies in the United States, are of an improper charac- 
 ter, your remonstrants charge that the memorialists have them- 
 selves perseveringly sought to effect perpetual arrangements more 
 stringent in their character than those which are made the ground 
 of their complaint. 
 
 In July last, at the invitation of the gentleman first among the 
 memorialists, a meeting of ten of the principal Telegraph Compa- 
 nies of the United States was held, and a proposition was then sub- 
 
mitted b>/ him, which contained, among other provisions, the fol- 
 lowing^ : — 
 
 " Tho several companies, parties hereto, bind themselves (o each 
 other to connect exclusively, as far as practicable, with the lines 
 of such existing comj)anies as may bocorao parties to this agree- 
 ment, and in no event to connect with any new lino whi(rh may bo 
 gotten up in opposition to, or to the obvious injury of any existing 
 line." 
 
 "This agreement shall take effect as soon as ratified by any 
 three of the companies, and shall be perpetual." 
 
 Your remonstrants were present at said meeting, and were in- 
 vited to join in this agreement. Their lines extended then, as they 
 now do, to tho Province of Nova Scotia. Had they acceded to the 
 propoh,ition, the memorialists would have been content ; but any 
 parties who might hereafter have extended lines to the frontier, 
 would have bad the very same ground of complaint against the 
 memorialists, that they now claim to have against your remon- 
 strants. 
 
 The patriotisin and solicitude of the memorialists are only ex- 
 cited when they regard their pecuniaiy interests as likely to be 
 afiected. 
 
 At the time of the meeting above-mentioned, and directly there- 
 after, it became evident to your remonstrants, that unless they 
 would accede to terms dictated by the memorialists, their design 
 was to effect a combination in opposition to your remonstrants, 
 and to certain Western and Southwestern companies. As the propo- 
 sition above quoted shows, the agreement was to be binding upon 
 the companies signing it, as soon as any three should ratify it. 
 
 For twelve years the memorialists have made every effort to pre- 
 vent competition in the business of telegraphing, and have enjoyed 
 the protection of a patent which has been in force eighteen years ; 
 and, having been notoriously wanting in the spirit of progress, they 
 now ask for legislation which would compel the enterprising to 
 share with them the well-earned reward of their risk and expendi- 
 tures. And this they presume to ask, when they have not oidy 
 
.tl 
 
 ■V 
 
 8 
 
 
 declined to participate in the hazard and outlay of the enterprise, 
 but liave eiiileavoretl, by ceaseless opposition, to embarrass its pro- 
 
 jfress. 
 
 It is not denied by your remonstrants tliat all of the companies 
 represented at the ineetini^ in July, excepting only the memorialists, 
 have united in an agreement for their mutual benefit, md for the 
 more prompt interchange of business, but without increasing rates, 
 or otherwise (combining to the disadvantage of the public. 
 
 And your remonstrants respectfully represent that, as they be- 
 lieve, none of the arrangements made by them in any way violate 
 tiie legal or moral rights of any parties; and they aver that no 
 parties have more readily entered into such arrangements than the 
 memorialists who now ask at your hands legislation for their pro- 
 tection. 
 
 Your remonstrants deny that they have, either alone or in com- 
 bination with others, endeavored to force the memorialists to sur- 
 render their property ; and aver that they have had no desire to 
 bring about a connection with the lines of the memorialists for any 
 other purpose than that, in the legitimate and proper extension of 
 their own lines, they might avoid a co'lision of interests with tho" 
 memorialists, and, at the same time, have lines extending to Wash- 
 ington, in ^rder to facilitate communication from their other lines; 
 to adopt iuij- \>ved systems of telegraphing, more rapid and more 
 perfect ; and to reduce the rates between New- York and Washing- 
 ton, now higher than in any other part of America, in order that 
 their other lijies might be bencifited and their patrons better served. 
 
 For this end they have repeatedly sought to effect an fjnicable 
 arrangement with the memorialists. 
 
 In November last your remonstrants proposed to lease the 
 property of the Magnetic Company for ten years, paying to them 
 a" annual rent equal to thirty per cent, upon the cost of new pro- 
 perty, superior in every respect to theirs, and covering the same 
 routes ; but the otfer was rejected. 
 
 Snbsequeiitly negotiations were opened between the memorialists 
 and your remonstrants, for the purpose of doing away with the 
 
p 
 
 prospective antagonism, by a union of interests ; and on the 23d of 
 December last the following memorandum was agreed upon : — 
 
 " Memorandum of an understanding between the Rfagnetic, 
 American, and New England Union Telegraph Companies, subjv^ct 
 to ratificftion. 
 
 " Let each of the three furnish to the other two a statement of 
 the proportions of a given amount of stock — say, for example, 
 $1,200,000 — which they think it right for them to claim in a con- 
 solidated company, with the statistics of their receipts and expenses, 
 and every fact on which their claim is bjised, with proofs. 
 
 " Let each appoint a committee of one, with full power to con- 
 sider and adjust the amount to be assigned to each. 
 
 " If the committees cannot unanimously agree, each company to 
 select a disinterested person, and the unanimous decision of the 
 three shall be final. No person to be selected as an arbiter who is 
 objected to by either of the companies. 
 
 (Signed.) 
 
 " For the Americaii. Company, 
 
 "PETER COOI'ER, President. 
 
 " For the Magnetic Company, 
 
 " AMOS KENDALL. 
 
 " For the N. E. Union Company, 
 
 "JOHN McKESSON. 
 
 " New-York, Dec. 23c?, 1857." 
 
 Three days afterwards, your remonstrants, by one of their 
 directors, sent the following communication to the representative 
 of the Magnetic Company : — 
 
 " New-York, Dec. 26th, 1851. 
 " Hon. Amos Kendall : 
 
 " Dear Sir : — Permit me to hand you enclosed a copy of the 
 memorandum of the 23d inst., and a letter addressed to Wm. M. 
 Swain, Esq., President, &c., which I send to you, as we understand 
 Mr. Swain is absent at the Fouth." 
 
 [The letter referred to was open, and contained an official copy 
 of a resolution of the directors of the American Company, ap- 
 
V 
 
 10 
 
 pointini^ one of their number a committee, in accordance with the 
 above memoriinclum.] 
 
 " I am cnnfaac<l in the preparation of the schedule to he fur- 
 nished to the other two companies, and shall be pleased to receive 
 tht'irs at thi'ir convoiiience. 
 
 " As the committee, on the part of this company, to meet with 
 like committees from the others, I shall be prepared to meet them 
 at any time they may agoee upon." 
 
 The Secretary of the American Company received in reply the 
 following : — 
 
 "Washington, Dec. 30th, 1857. 
 
 " Dear Sir :— I deem it my duty, in courtesy to your company, 
 to inform you that letters received this day from Mr. McKesson, 
 render the accession of the New England Union Company to the 
 provisional articles recently agreed upon by Mr. Cooper, Mr. 
 Mi'Kesson and myself, entirely hopeless. 
 
 " Sincerely regretting that our labors have not led to a pacific 
 result, I must consider the projecit of the union of the three com- 
 panies at an end — at least for the present. 
 " Very respectfully, 
 
 " Your ob't servant, 
 
 " Amos Kendall." 
 
 It will, therefore, be evident that the representations of the 
 memorialists to the effect that your remonstrants have sought to 
 oppress them, are unfounded ; and that, on the contrary, the memo- 
 rialists have had every opportunity to participate in any advan- 
 tages your remonstrants may have secured, but have of their own 
 choice declined so to do. 
 
 Your remonstrants respectfully represent, that they are not 
 aware that tl c memorialists have any prescriptive right to the 
 telegraphing business between Washington and New- York, and 
 therefore do not feel the force of the complaint of the memorialists 
 that they are to bo deprived of their local business; although 
 your remonstrants admit, that if such local business should be 
 
11 
 
 materially reduced, the Mac^netic Company could scarcely expect 
 to make dividends of twenty-four per cent, per annum, as tbey have 
 done in past years, upon the cash capital actually paid in. 
 
 They will experience from your remonstrants none but open and 
 fair competition ; and if their adherence to old systems of tele- 
 graphing, or their prudence or want of enterprise, shall prevent 
 them from sowing in new fields, your remonstrants see no reason 
 that they should be permitted to reap harvests therein. 
 
 Your remonstrants further respectfully deny that the Atlantic, 
 Newfoundland and American Companies are one in interest, or 
 that they have ever been one and were separated for any purpose 
 whatever ; though it is not denied that some of the stockholders in 
 the American Company are also owners in the others. 
 
 A large majority in numbers and in interest, in each of the com- 
 panies, has no interest in either of the others. 
 
 It is respectfully submitted, therefore, that the solicitude mani- 
 fested by the memorialists, lest one of the companies charged should 
 hold more than its just share of benefits, is needless.* 
 
 While your remonstrants might with propriety leave the 
 foreign companies complained of, to answer to the authorities by 
 whom they were created and are governed, yet they are unwill- 
 ing that a misrepresentation of those companies here, should be 
 made the ground of unfriendly legislation by Congress, 
 
 In 1853, a company obtained a charter from the Province of 
 Newfoundland, for the purpose of enabling them to erect telegraph 
 lines therein, and to connect them with the continent of America. 
 This company having been compelled, after the expenditure of a 
 large amount, to discontinue the work from wan{ of means, ap- 
 plied to the parties now composing the New- York, Newfoundland 
 and London Telegraph Company, and induced them to purchase 
 the rights acquired under ^aid charter, to pay about $70,000 to 
 cancel the indebtedness then existing, and to undertake the com- 
 pletion of the enterprise. 
 
 Incessantly since 1854, and in the lace of the greatest discour- 
 
i 
 
 i . 
 I 
 
 I ? 
 
 12 
 
 agements, said Newfoundland Company has energetically pushed 
 forward the undeitakincf. 
 
 Tlioir lines through the Province of Newfoundland and the 
 Island of ('ape Bnston, were constructed with great difficulty, and 
 at an expense unavoidably exceeding, as your reinonstrants arc pre- 
 pared to sliow, by more than tenfold, the cost of lines of like extent 
 in tlie United States, 
 
 In 1855 their effort to lay a cable across the Gulf of St. Law- 
 rence was unsuccessful. A second cable was procured and laid in 
 the followihg year. 
 
 They have already expended more than $800,000, and have 
 realized no return from their investment ; but, on the contrary, the 
 line is now worked at a loss. 
 
 In 1856 the Atlantic Company was formed in England, through 
 the earnest efforts of one of the Directors of the Newfoundland 
 Company, who manifested his confidence in the enterprise by 
 incurring individual responsibility for more than $400,000 of its 
 stock. 
 
 This stock he offered at cost to any parties in America, but npt 
 a share was taken by the memorialists, who now demand that the 
 Government shall secure to them advantages likely to result from 
 the risks incurred alone by some among your remonstrants, and 
 otliers, with whom they are charged to be improperly con- 
 federating. 
 
 Your remonstrants beg leave to say that the Director above 
 referred to has, in addition to the sacrifice of his own valuable pri- 
 vate business, paid for and still holds no less than $130,000 of the 
 stock of the Atlantic Company, making his individual outlay, 
 including his investment in the Newfoundland Company, to exceed 
 $300,000 ; no part of which is as yet productive. 
 
 After the sacrifices he has made, and the risks he lias taken to 
 secure the success of this most important undertaking of the age, 
 the fate of which is still uncertain, it is most unjust that ho should 
 be assailed, as he is in said niomorial, and that unworthy insinua- 
 
13 
 
 tions of mercenary motives should be thrown out in regard to him, 
 when he so richly merits distinn^uished honor. 
 
 His individual investment in the hazardous experiment of estab- 
 lishing telegraphic communication between the coitinent of 
 America and Ireland, is greater than the actual cost of the whole 
 of the lines owned by the memorialists. 
 
 Your remonstrants respectfully submit that the representations 
 of the memorialists, that inordinate gains are to be reaped by in- 
 dividuals from the Atlantic line, are based wholly on estimates of 
 probable profits, and form no good reason for legislation likely to 
 embarrass the euterpi-ise, at a time when the result is uncertain, 
 especially as the governments have reserved the right to regulate 
 the tariff of rates. 
 
 Your remonstrants are aware of the great benefits conferred 
 upon the enterprise of the Atlantic telegraph by the governments 
 of Great Britain and the United States, in permitting the use of 
 vessels of their navies to assist in the great work ; but neither 
 government has been called en to contribute anything further 
 towards the cost of the work ; and the annual sum which they 
 have agreed to pay for the transmission of their dispatches does 
 not begin to accrue until the line is in successful operation. And 
 so soon as the enterprise yields a return of six per cent, to the 
 company, the amount which each government is bound to pay is 
 limited to fifty thousand dollars per annum. 
 
 The Atlantic Company hi j, as yet, received no appropriation 
 of money in aid of its undertaking, from any source. 
 
 Shares of the Atlantic Company which cost the subscribers 
 £1,000 each, have been freely oflfered as low as £600, and many 
 of the original shares are now upon the market at a price far be- 
 low their cost. 
 
 It is not known to your remonstrants that any underwriter of 
 responsibility in the world will insure upon the next attempt to 
 lay the cable. 
 
 Your remonstrants beg leave further to state, that while indi- 
 
!■ 
 
 :i 
 
 14 
 
 vidiials amoiii); their nninber have mad(i great exertions to secure 
 the succfssfui completion ot' the Atlantic lino, there have been 
 parties, encouragcil, as your remonstrants believe, by tlie memo- 
 rialists, who have souii^lit first from the Lerrislature of the State of 
 New- York, and subsequently from the Provincial Parliament of 
 Canada, a charter for a rival Atlantic line. 
 
 Your remonstrants do not deny, that, under thes3 circumstances, 
 and the impossibility of ol)taininiT the necessary capital without 
 some such arrangement, the Newfoundland and Atlantic Compa- 
 nies did obtain from Eastern States and Provinces, assurances, 
 which were cheerfully granted, that they should enjoy alone for a 
 specified period, the right of connecting an ocean line to the coast, 
 in ord(!r that their investment might bo saved from utter destruc- 
 tion, if haply a successful issue should crown the Atlantic enter- 
 prise. 
 
 To this extent only are the Companies named open to the charge 
 of monopoly so prominently set forth in said memorial. 
 
 Your remonstrants respectfully submit that it is not unreason- 
 able that a work of such vast cost as the Atlantic Telegraph, being 
 wholly of an experimental character, should receive at least as 
 much encouragement as an invention for whicti patents are granted. 
 The memorialists are in the enjoymint of a patent which has 
 been made to cover a period of twenty-one years. 
 
 The lines of the memorialists extend eastwardly, only to Boston, 
 and were erected many years ago, with no reference whatever to a 
 connection with Europe. 
 
 Having hazarded nothing in the experiment of the Atlantic line, 
 or in the costly constructions of the Newfoundland Company, but, 
 on the contrary, having opposed the former to the limit of their 
 power, the memorialists now demand, for their protection, that they 
 shall be permitted to share in the prospective benefits of these un- 
 dertakings. 
 
 Confidently believing that Congress will regard the general con- 
 siderations first presented, to which others equally forcible might 
 
15 
 
 be added, as in themselves amply sufficient to require the denial of 
 the prayer of the memorial, your remonstrants respectfully submit 
 that the peculiar circumstances of the case aftbrd important addi- 
 tional reasons in opposition to the desired enactment. 
 
 April 20, 1858. 
 
 PETER COOPER, 
 WILSON G. HUNT, 
 Committee of the American Telegraph Company.