IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I 1.25 1128 112.5 32 III JiliM 22 go 111= LA. ill 1.6 V] usy merchant and a full treasury, but you have above ^11 a ',.:ntented nnd happy people. Daniel Webster, the great American statesman, speaking upon thii point, after he had been converted to protective views, said : **Tlii' ititorests of every l;il»4>iiriii;; nMuniuiiit.v n^qulre divei'shy ol' occiiiDai ion, pursuits and «»'»J«'cts of'iiuhisfry. The more that
  • olicies comlnned helped to increase the population of the United States at a greater rate than the increase in the Dominion But, Sir, if we take the American census of 1880 and the Canadian census of 1S81, and if we seh.'ct a nuud'crof the olde: States, which offer a fair ground for comparism with the Dominion of Canada, we will find we have held our own very well. 01" course if you go into the newer States, with attrac- tions (»f new territory and prairie soil, you will find a much larger percerit.age of increase ; but, what I want is to make a comparison with the older strifes. Connecticut, which had 537,000 inhaltitants in 1871, had 622,683 in 1881. Cownecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Dakota — I put in Dakota as a set-off to Manitoba— -compeuring those states with Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Ontario, Qut-hec, Mniiitoluv rui'l J British (^oluiiil)ia, I fiPid tliat the American Statt s incroa.sod IfiOG and the l)*;miriion of Canada increased 17.03 pt-r cent in popnlatiMU according to the last census ; so that when we make a proper cimi- parison between the Dominion and the older and more settled p^r- tious of the T."^iiited States we find we have more than held our own. Now, the complaint has been made that the National Policy htw not done its duty, because times have not been so brisk as they were in 1882-83. But, as I said before, if we compare the pasition of trade in Canada wit)) the position of otlier countries — in the United States, and Great Britain, for instance — we will find tliaL nnr posi- tion is better than theirs, and we caii {gather Upoiii this, tlia( but for the Xationul Policy ruin and lianlirnpfcy would liave Iwen upon us. It is in tinies when there is great depression in sur- rountling countries, wi\en there are over-production and slaughter in prices of goods in tliose countries, that we find the protective policy desirable ami advantageous, and it has proved itself here highly bene- ficial in protecting us from the onslaughts which would have been made upon us by foreign manufacturers. T proposed to deal with this question more fully, but I have occupied so large a share of the pul>lic time that I cannot ;^o into it as fully as I would wish. I wont, however, to give one instance to show how the National Policy is affecting the wage-e arner in this country at present. All that is reqv'red for the pro chances existing for placing the products of his investment; and the smaller the output he has, the larger percentage he must put upon that output in order to meet the interest upon his capital and the depreciation of his plant. There is a very familiar illustration of this. You take a blast furnace which requires $80,000 t/) meet the interest upon the capital invested in it and the depreciatitm of the plant If the output of that furnace be 15,000 -ons bf pig inwi, of course there must be $2 a ton put on the iron, in order to pay the interest and the depreciation of the plant. If you increase the output to 20,000 tons, then it only requires SI 50 per ton to pay these charges; if you increase it to 80,000 toTus, you only want Si a ton upon it, to pay a divi(li>n-d and you can soil the \n^ in^n $1 a ton oinuiper. If you run the output ' up to (jO.OOO tons, all you waiit is r»0 cents a ton and you have #.!(>.()()() rais(!(it or yuu iiiiist h:ive a tow ran* of wa<><'s, and iliu) iiH'aii.s a low svnU' of liviiiu and a .siiiail ('.v.M'iidiliire koi' MU' iM'iH'Ui of tl!<^ larun'l'. Alureover, you cannot for any considerable length of time, keep men employed ac a low rnt»; of wages, whilf across the border, in the I'nited Stativiiit; a laruM'r market (o our own nianulaetnivrs, and we liave the result tint a Iar«r4'r, a ynore jtenerous wajje is h<^iiis' paid to the euii>3oyees than previous to the iutroduction or tills poliey. A vote for the National Policy means to demand that the products of forcigii pauper labor shall be kept out of Canada ; a vote a.?ainst the National Pohcy means that these products shall come into unrestricted competition with Cfanadian labor. Piiblifhed by the Iudu?»trial Lea^e, for gratuitou* diatribution..— FBJtDKBic N'i('H"i,r„s, Secretary, Toronto, Oanada.