^^ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-S) h {/ V. 1.0 I.I 11.25 I ^ Ilia IS lis IIIIIM 1.4 6" i.8 1.6 V] <^ /J ^/ %\^' "^ /^ c/^^»;> Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAiN STREET WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 872-4503 •1>^ ^ rV £>" iV A \ V ^ ^ m -.^ t/j ,v^ CIHM Microfiche Series (l\/lonographs) ICIVIH Collection de microfiches (monographies) Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques O^ ftftO Technical and Bibliographic Notes / Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked below. D D Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur Covers damaged/ Couverture endommagee □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restauree et/ou pelliculee □ n Cover title missing/ Le titre de couvertuic manque Coloured maps/ Caites geographiques en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ Relie avec d'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La reliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsion le long de la marge interieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, m?is, lorsque cela etait possible, ces pages n'ont pas ete filmees. Additional comments:/ Commentaires supplementaires; This Item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est filme au taux de reduction indique cidessous. 10X 14X 18X 12X L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a eti possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-£tre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui p' L- C. J. » It is recommended that all the errata be entered In their appropriate places in the work. THE QUEBEC LAW DIGEST, ^OL. II, BEING A COMPLETE COMPILATlbr^^:; / " OF ALL THB CANADA RKPORTED DECISIONS IN THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, From the First of January, 18T7, down to the First of Jantary, 1881, TOGETHEK WITH A LARGE KUMBEH OF IMPORTANT DECISIONS, PRINCIPALLY OF THE YEARS 1876-77, NOT TO BE FOUND IN ANY OF THE liEPORTS, THE WHOLE ANALYTICALLY DIGESTED AND ARRANGED, WITH CONSTANT REFERENCE TO THE CODES AND STATUTES IN RELATION THERETO, BY CHARLES HENRY STEPHENS, B.C.L., ADVOCATE. MONTREAL : PUBLISHED BY JOHN LOVELL & SON, 1882. I /■ E.T.H.O, acco..ingtoActo,Pa,.lia„,e„to,C„n.,a. i.. the ,ear one thousand eight hundred and eight^-two, BY JOHN LOVP]LL, In the Office of the Minister of Agriculture an,I Statistics at Ottawa. <^ 73 7/ PREFACE. nd eiglit hundred i This volume is, of course, a continuation of the first. In its preparation, however, I have enjoyed several advantages as compared with tlie first wliich only require to be mentioned to be obvious to every one. These are the experience ac(iuired in the preparation of the first ; a gi-eater personal familiarity with the cases to be digested ; and a body of matter more easily handled. By means of thtise I have (as I believe) been able to carry out more perfectly the aim of the first v..hu)ie, namely, to make the work not oidy a mere index to the reported cases, but to' make it a work of reference such as may be to a great extent cited with confi- dence without further reference to the reports. In digesting a case I have studied to give all of its essentials, all which appears to have influenced the decision as far as could be gathered from the report ; to make, in otlier words, the digested statement a complete epitome of the case in as few words as possible. Besides being a digest of the reported cases for the period mentioned on the title page, this volume will be found also a digest of the principal public statutes of the Province and of the Dominion for the same period. This it is hoped will add very largely to its usefulness. Statutes so short as to run a chance of beinII,".'."'""'f> •"'« ACTION vi-oTiitxAUV, HYPOTHEC ahatf-:mknt. I. Ok I'lDLio NiiHA.NcK, .w NUISANCE. AIiDUCTION_.sv« CKLAIINAL LAW. ABSCONDING l)KET01{-_^ee CAPIAS. AIISKNCE. CAPUS,^"''""''""'' '"""-•''''''^'" "^ Cai-ias, see If- Ok Dkmvkrv of Q HI. Ok (Jl IV. Of S UODI, ahaxtke. I'fCKSSIOX. rRA.VSKKIl TO MiN OR. !• Ok IJki.eo ATIO.V. ABSENTEE. I. Action AfiAixsT. n. PllK.SCHIPTION AGAINST. 1. Action aoainht. 1. Dorendant licinjj; siic.i in Montreal ,lpclinp,| tlie,iiins,lictioM on tlic t;ronii,l tliat llic n'.'lit ol IlH(j lUlt action (lid not orlfrioute tlu-re; that hv been served personally there, and that he n-as not doM.icded there, Imt in New York Tl e Sin^nor Court .Maintained the exception ; hut 3. Appelliinl* were the niorlitaceen of « .., forty purchased l,y .Tspondent n^, the " o : W'or, w„h ,.ndertul ol the undertaking, and above all th ■•'.'pondent had made imynienis on act „ "• niort^aae to appellants-y/f/,/ 1^/10! "'"t 'l,e registration was not evi e, ce ola [ ' ;s';:;;',X:i=t::>a;;r I- N. 3M, Q, j{. JH80. i*»,''.t, A t •1. Hut where the cie,lito,- had accepted the He«al,on without .lischargi, « the first !l to -• JMl, on a con estation oCa collocation n, fa v.r >e m;d,terthat novation hmi not taken p,.' Nd the release ,y the creditor of half the la P P itjl onlv to h,s hypothec thereon, add . a( eel t,e pergonal liability of the or 'i a W4, it 2t J.. C. J. ;t3, S. C. R. 1H79. 5. But in the Superior Court, under similar s e,l the ,M,<,,u^ the latter demurred on the ue aa\on—J{eld, that the action was a suiK- c en acceptance of the delej-ation. (rHal/orn ct n,>uc/ur, 2 L. N. 285,S. C. R. IHVJ & II H. tanii ph.l a iiu reiai rxlei lealli of in SoliH. I biiidi iliir-( I H,;tll Ij, g IV !t. a tnti I'dlllK witho liulla 10. sliarei^ iniiKir under llrhl, Dial ti mice. S. C. 1 I. Li EXCH I. Ri TORS, &%\i, mi ' ^''^' ^' ^- ^^- '^^'^> H. PREscnipTioN against. 2. In an action In declaration of hynothec the.lelendant pleaded in/rr alia prescription of ten years wit.i tille-Zy.W, .hat'as the' plain- tirl had been absent all the time, and the pres- cription invoked was prior to the C. ije tiint the ol hs fr , ' ;.,'.'7 '."'''T, ""' t- apfear within two iiii nois iioiii tlie lust pul)liciU oiiof siieli oiil.-r Tli,. order iiuist be pulilislie.! in the Fre i"h 11° ,1 Knirlisl e vsimpcrs are in.licate.l in the ,.r,ler by the cou?t or JU'lge, o r the iirothoiiotary. fis f. C. 1'. court or A( ()• And ma later case— //fW, that the accent ance was matter of consent merely betwee,^ t cmlitor and the purchaser, and .nav 1 e p o 0' shewing i,at both purchaser and c e,lito ucknowledsed and accepted the relaton o' atN^-sirR^^a^^--^''^^-""; II. Of Dei.ivekv of Goods. 7. A person who takes delivery of Roods ordered by another person in his\,ame tuu tei; '^i": "'I'''-;- "■' ^''e undet'suntli,;' ■ at the sellers should draw on such party lor 1 e amount of mvoice, ca.tnot retain t te K thereof. / ouhn & yVillUvm, 22 I.. C. J. 18, Q. B. i« * opay'^j:' hi^^lSSf,'"" ''y the. deljtor of a person who « ue iueretta>,noexi,re« acceptance ollheaelegatiou. , I. Ca ( see NEC H. Li : VANT, AC , I. Rio EXCHA II. In I -the reprei OKPTANCE. .'EPTANCE. ION. V OP OooDB. •■TKE. lO.V. H TO Minor. I)N. iTf tlio inorltraffocd of « pro- 1 ' if.-i)(.n.i»Mil ri„„i tiie n,'j,rl- Ik MIL' [,Y IVH|y„„|,.Ml to pav poiiilcnt to an aotion on tlin il "ftiit of accciiianec. An- ,' .liaiic:, |.rt.(,M„l,.,l tlia( tacit i ii'ient, and thai tlic rc^'istra-' iikiiiK, liiid abuv,. all tliati If piiytricritN on awoiiiit ofl ,pi.|lantM— //e/,/, j,, appealt! was Hot fvuionce of accept- ' ecciptw of iMiyinoiiiHiiiil ijotj of tlio iK'w debtor, I, lit oiilvi SociiU I'ermuiieii/e tie Con- ' n," 2 L. N. 148, S. C., & 4 ciedito- had accppted tliei NcliargiigtlieHrstdelitor- on ot a collocation in favor vatioii had not taken place p creditor of half the land' ivpothec tlicreon, and did III liuhility of the orij,'inal i, Jack\ioii & Lediic, 2 L N , S.C.K. 1H7-J. Tior Court, under sinjilar Kirtga;;e creditors having; latter demurred on the t alleged that the delef;a- I pnortc the inslitutioirof t tlie action was a stitfi- (lelPfration. O'JJal/uran 2«5, S. C. K. 1879. A l,If<. & 2;{ L. C. .(. 240, ■i/uiiubaull, (bllowed. c—IIehl, tha; the accept, ifent merely hetween th» aser, and may he proved purcliaser and creditor cepted the relation of H ct Loan Co. & Guertin, )80. ' Goods. dees delivery of goods I'soii in Jiis name and on the understanding liraiv on fuch i)arty lor janiiot retain tlie goods Iral't, orpav the amount .vw,22J..C. J.18,Q.B. 8 ACCOUNT. Ilf. Of OiAUANTi.:!.;. Unner to he ellec! that, in con-ideratVoM of the r, f r rivnml'"' '''"'■' '^ -v-ldreHsed endorsing u hole lor KIIIO n, lavor of (|,e tanner, he will reiain in hm handn ,he .urphn lund^ to th- extent o f2.IH)() ari,,ng iVon', ihe naleH of .1 leather then <:o„iing |„ |„r >ale un,| i,. pr.nieHH Ol manular are, iH hmding on s..,), a-enl •■ ».M,»ly. «,lho,.l .peeiul arceptance, and is .'Iho l;l"'lMjg, not».ths|a„din:: that the note so en- it y iJ iM7i» '' " ''• ^- ''^''"^' -* '- ^- •'• IV. Of Si'ccEHsioN. 9 Where a HuoceHsio,, had heen accepted hv a tutor to minor., with ,he a,lvice of a lUmilV CO ne,l-//W,/, thai i, eould not he set asid'e I without .Making, he rs parties to the action. Kvllnndl/c Miv.luiud, 1) H. L. l!», Q. U. ih7G. V. Ok Tiunskkk to Minok. 10. VVhere a lather made a transfer of Bank 8m.es Irom himself lo himself in trust lor I is I" Ir, I "'','"''' ''T '''''' "^ '"'"' 'wo dividends nnder the Handler, hut refused to pav further- that tilt' ininsler was void lor want of acceoi- rc'i87^ ^ '^"'"" ^^""^■. 5 y- i^. H- ^«^, ACCOUNTS. -ho debtor of a person w'lo ( simple iiidicalioii by tha ri^colvp in his pUce, or the ilioiit the acceptance of the n, 1174, C. C. 22 [..C.J. 101) in which lu. crndltor in favorolanother ictlon by such creditor so xeptauce of the deleKatioii . ACCEI'TANCES. EXCHANGE "* ^"''••'■■f"". *<^<-' I»1^LS OF ACCESS. I lUKt,, HIVLRUEACHHS, SERVITUDES. ACCESSION-,SVe OwNKu.sHip. ACCIIJENTS. ^*Jnegugk1:^ce""""""""^^^°"-^'"^' viWrSlG^^-l^Ill^^^^^SEK- ACCOMMODATION PAPER. ; eIcSaNGK '^"*^'^'"^'"^'= <'^' ^ee BILLS OF I f ACCOUNT. ., I. Action on, see ACTION Assumpsit. I n. Action to, sec ACTION. rJJl' ^l Ad.MIXISTR.V1 ion OF Sko -TuKlV LKKH OF School Com.mis.sioners. IV. Of CoNTlNVKD COMMINITY ': V. Op Tutorship. I. Action to. " "'P Plaintill-/M/. that the nullitv men- Honed m Art .111 of the Civil C.«|e' lii, , ie«anl to settlements U.tweeu a nuuor U'comc "I age and Ins tu,„r, relali.ig lo i|,e a.lministra. II' '", "I'lv a relative nullity, and must he 'e nvoked hy the .iiipil. win. cannot hring aa U Ml to accM.nt ,/. i,l,n,n against the tutor, "ilhout asking to -elieved Iron, the dis.diarge given up,,,, ihe I rst a.;..,,,,,,, ri.r,. & HulUr,, .1 I.. N. js, & 24 L. C..J., Itl7 y. H. |M7!». ,Jri' A,;';'""/"acc,)uut hetween,/,,,,,,,/,,/;. part "tTH. I>l,.a. li.at It was h,r plaintilf to ren,|er !'" '"^'•">"|t, us he ha,l m hiH p,>ssession .he l«"'ks an,| papeis ..f ||,e i.artnership. I'lea over,„le,|,a,„|„e,e„,l,.,„c„.„len,.,e,ltor'..„leran Hc,.,jnnt. lUnll^ Joncx, 2 L. N . .•12.-,, S. C. Srm.oPr'^'"'"''"''''"^'""* "'■ Skc-TrkaS. OF .^('HOdl. CoM.MlSSlo.NKHS. !•'*• An a,;coui,t of the a,lmii,istration of the .^I'c- 1 .y.as. ol .Scl,.,ol Com,„issione.-H must he ren,le,'e,| heloi^e act.,,., .'a., he h.ought li,r hal- «t Ifuriewk; 'J R. L. Itil, g. IMK77. IV. Of CoNTlNl-KD Co.M.MIMrV. It. A won.a., in comn.uniiy with her h.is- ''and ,l.e,|, leav..,g a will hv which she he- 'l"<'ail,e,| to her hn.|,a,„| ilnH,,. the time he Mi,>ul,l remai., u.i„,arrie,l the .is.iirnct ami on,|ovn,e,it„f all her properly, on h.s niakin,' a go,. .i,.,l la.thlul .nve.,.,,.-y tliere.,1, a,.,| ,,,, hiH d«'ath tl,eren,a,.„ierwasloherhe.rs. The hui- 'a.n,l neglecte,! ,„ make an inventory, an. Ion l-M,.rsne,l for an a,:c.,„nt hv o.,e of "tl e 'irT |jea,le,| that she had s„|,| to him all her h'ht <' succession in the estate of the ,lecea,se,l, an. Iter her ,,,a,,„r,ty ,ai,lie,l and a, l<„owle|?/e lie sale- //,.W,lh.U hy such sale th. plai ,1? ' ha,l sfippe, herself of the right to .ienla, ,| a" account and partage of the etfects of the com ^^'''j'll'-jy^f-' '''''•'• v..SV..l«^,,>,.l L.N. UG. V. Of Tutorship. .iiiuige ha,l acceple,| an ac,u,..nt from h/r tutor a.„l approved of it-ffeH, that she co, Id not get a., o.-der against her tutor to ren, er a other acco.i.it unt.l nhe h,i,| aske,| to he lelease,! t,.,,,,, the tirst one. Des.,,-ose:ilers & liiendeau, 24 L. C. .1. 170, Q. B. 1877. Nor is a tutor ohiiged to render an account because he shouM have in his hands a s^ sum of money which he has dishurse.l to the knovvledge ot the mi.,o^ sin.e hecome n ai a.„ done other acts of a,|.,iinist,.ationsu ,^,i.' 476, i. c'IihT' ^'''l^'^^'>-^i'Methr, 10 R. L. ACCOUNTS. I. Betm-ekn P.^HTXEu,s,«ee PARTNERSHIP II. Of E.xEci'roRS. III. Rendekix.j of. IV. Setti.e.ment of. V. Vouchers with. in'rt^i?? sottlemont hnlwoon .n minor hpr.onif^ of iira acoouutand the delivery of vouch'ers Tn sSpp^ortlierlot ■i-v-TSRf; it ACQUITTAL. Mi! n. Of Executors. 16. Action by appellant as universal lpSfee PAYMENT liECElPT, ETC. ' A GTE. I. Ai'THENiic, see DKEDS. • Op Pabtage, nee PARTITION. ACTION. I. Against. A linen fee. ■^snignee. Interdict. Jffinor,i . Miuiicipal Corporations. J">(yf't>p, xee PAllTNERSniP >>c/iooi Commissioners, ^ncce.f.von. Women. n. A.,,. Parties Interested mcst he Joiked 8 J-aroIs^e^- Si C/emZ 'Iri^aumers de liomiard, 21 l! c' j! m.t cmht?""'"" IV. Settlement of. 19. In an action on account »i.o a c ^ amount sued lor wps shewn tn I '' ' "" V. Ayotte, 8 L. N. 27.8, Q rifeSO "' V. Vodcher.s. rie7' 7'/' T" .""' ''•'t^'-Hble. Mo, I ,"e ACKNOWLEDGMENT— ;See EVI- I>ENCp; Admissions. I. Of Debt Si-fficik.st to Prevfnt Pn„. CR.PTioN, see PRE,SCUIPTI0N. ^" ACQUIESCENCEl^ee WAIVER. I. In Ji'DojiENTs, see JUDGMENTS ACQUISITIONS. ACQUTITAL. I. Dl.SCHARGE OF ,hrRV DT'pivn T„. Egn^ALENr to, see CRIMlSkl LAw'tru"! * Aflirined in Supreme Court. I nr. Assjmpsit. IV. liY. Father of Minor. Partnership after Chnnqe of Partners lurcl,aser of Honse to 'kcrt Jes'T ^^ii^eof Pe^-soUeea^f: Surety. V. CoNTINlED FOR CosTs, See COSTS VI. Conviction a i.AR to. MFNT m. ^■''•■"■^■"'•■L'ANOE OF SuBJECT TO PaV IV i^ ^o^T'^j «ee COSTS. '" ' ay lA. En bORNAOE. A. E.v Cojipi.ainte. \\'t ^w ^u"'^ ''^'""' "E Paternity. \n\ Vv p'-"'''"''''''"'' ""^ CURATELLE. AUi, i.N Garantie. Y V •,J=^'"',/^'"'>1T10N DE CoMPTE. V.V, '^•'■' l^K'XTEGRANUE. AVI. I i.-t he Corporation of Montreal for dama-e o prua.e property, does not exclude the • dlt to proceed l,v ordinary action, and iCtle c7r pomion wishes to estkbli.«h ti'.e amour,, of tl.; a Kige by means of commissioners, it is (br t en o demand the appo.nt.nent of such coni- DLSMoners ^forrison & Mayor, d-c, of \[„n. ^m'ML.N.25, &lQ.B.R':i07, q'. U. iS. JL 'Yi''""'''"^- - ^«''"" "•«« i"-tituted against a (irn, as composed of D. G. & W. G. 1 .1, that no partnership existed. Evidence, ^^t there was a firm. I„,t not composed as 11 ged Action dismissed, but without costs, lio , nfP ?' ''^''" I" 'J"«'di-^'^l"^*''l thecomposi: ion of the hrin. Mureu v. Gaherlti 2 I NT 108, S. C. 1879. ^aneity, i. u. j\. 28. Hehool Comnii.i.sioners.— Action by school commissioners as a corporation against thne of their number personally. It was" alleged tha the , etendans without cau.se or reason, but .llcgally, fraudulently, and in bad faith, had ,, due, $.i(,outof the lundsof the plaintiffs. Fur- fco "'January, 1878, another sum of *.0 20 was paid by defendants, with the money Of p amti Is, tbr costs on a judgment renS atS> m".;.h'' ""' ^' 'h' >I«I"''"-ate's Con at Ste. Marthe against plaintitts, at the suit of J. A., who claimed her salary as a teacher which sums defendants illegally, unjnstlv and m liad faith reluMMl to pay her Defendants pleadci want of notice of action, and t a o c nh?b '7 r'"'h ''':''^'^'"' ^^'"•^''" tl"' ««t " nn- ofi.a:r&z^ .School Coinmsswuers of Ste. Marthi &''si Pierre, 2 L. N. 348, S. C. 1879. court at a v\ht^ r r .r"*''*'"'"^ ^'"^ '"" to the Vr , '^^ '*".\,''tage of the case and mt relief Bousquet & Motuiseau, 2 L. N. 59, S C. R. 1879. |'-i';"r «"" •' >f --'' oi- i.'iiiejt^a'?,'; ;;*T.;;.^ ?i,!rnf tlie pipcfs or piircel-. (if Innd or real estate t^Ln\\T,hl »»:«;■"'"■■ tt"' amount o.^componjit on o b " naid"^ ™i. 11 "*•"".' to 'lie amount of comDPn«Rfi,in r!tl wli cli flaniaRe ttin partv siiitainlnp the same nrf'thl eald corporation simll not a«reo and t ic. ammMi'/^V; ^2 componsutlon simll be liak at once bv thoTiT„;?f,f"'''' h°oV?oa"^ t";"*^ ''■•'«''' "<^'''- hnurtinl .^ ' ""'' ""y l'^'™" wlio »ball erect an» shall torfcii his orlU clalnS ^'«mici"o? T """'™' tion, by roas>, ,i. Ihompson v. /W/tr, 2 1.. N. 34;^, «. e. coi;itJirLrSn;s.iri^iSh'V'^'''^ "pa-nuuieinihu.!?\,r;i;e':;r:r'S'i:r:;:; dor, aiiiuiijj wlioiM was tiic coiito-finV , nriil Hfvei-ally msponsible a« (br a o,u,J i /!, . ,;^l. And where all the parties who «lionl,I l,« JOWK., hitvo ,K.t heen, it i«'the d,Uy of ,he . , r theiL^'y^r'^'^'^"'^''" ''-todi:;r in. Assi-Mi-siT, see By Partners/up u.Sv^SS^,;^i^ttj;?rp^Sv /p;;tf'Pedtc-sSirS'S I: t=^;i o;':^-^-,s-t,S,^ --HL .M.pelhu,t hro„ghr.S'; a Ju^ ;; /M/, ihat th,. action in assumpsit i„ Zrl^ LZ .^i>. A person who )iad been secretarv fmno thee aim ot the „^sulventaJ:ainst these!.,! . Iiiissioners. 'J'he nhii„(i/f '"■ ' " e/*t-'"ool coMi- one xidU, thai the aciiun must b.^ diemssed ACTION, 12 ler quality dren. They the'l.S'l.'eeL::" "«f "">' o'' f'e administration of aid 'hai,rt:;r-'x;:;:'f^S''^ ;'■;.'''•'''■'' tutor (,.!,- ''" '""' '"■'^" appointed i] iV, O earned on business ..t Sli,.,.l„ " ""^'•»•— Ik- firm oCn I) l- ,,'"'■".•'' Mieiln.oke under of tutrix to her miimr ehil- with -roods-' Tb'l ;'r '" '"''''''" ■•"^P'-'lont iiliii drafts referred to in; "°"''- "'''^'*"'''' "»« ;;;:ce^ " a;;^-^/&,=i:^:roS.s pic-^sr'i:r:Sir^''^Ft p;"?' /'<':'■<' liaser of Umsc to Eiect the Le,,.'^ j;;;^t,.tt^pe,ii;iV';:c;iri:;\:^^ u onglit; that havin- reoogn ze,l the jeu«e f.is IT V, *" ■^"'"'*'' ^0 I^' J- 458, Q, li. 1880 'i^.-JtepresentativeH of a perso, de,,n,^l ''-^ , «< 11, the mother, two brothers and a nimoFsister f . Jt.,- <» -T. ^CTIOl^-. 12 13 ACTi./f-T. >iint of the administration of (UHiirrr, ghowin^r ,||e ,I,,tail8 »,",'\ ''• •''''''""' ('"'"Mu- . '•>ii.L. 1G1,Q. Ij, 1877. "'''•.-A(;tioii l,v imlier for 1 liy tlic ilfleMiliiiit. There lilt he liiid hceti (i()|)(iiiited that It wa.H the (iiiher wlio "f .service of I he ileleiidant icdoii were I hut hv special ' iiiil had ack,i„wle,l-ed to 'li'iiitKi: Acli„M dismissed ''(« V. JJunnaiitl, (! y. J,. 2{. ■("• t%flr/,//e of rarlnrrs— iiiiossiuShcrhi„„ke under >•, mid I es| 11)11; lent was car- •rations at the niine,s in ■(liisJK.j, tiieieiii order to iit. the mines. Tiie hiiai- ig time, and ihev supiiiied L'dHtuj'es/iotnh'iil. U di«t '■) 1871, and ijie hiisiness ider the .siiine name hv B "tseil, (J, whuacted as well mviDjr i,p(.,, romniiaie en leased Imshaiid, as in 'f to her minor chil- d to sii|,|)ly respundent i;n was i„iw lin,uv'ht hy t the Items chaij:et| in the supplied h.vlhe.iMrtrni. 1 their de(darati(,n so as hhrnis, but there was an he widow represented her i? heeii commune en hiens minors. -I'lie action re- e action of assumjjsit for ?d, and for iiionevH ad- low dismissed the "action '!■• iliat the old tirin was 1 of 0, and it was not plaintillk le,^rallv repre- Second. Because the account were not pro- f, that these two jrrounds ere \yaH a third stronger *d of bein^' hroiiirht in 1 have shewn that these id heen settled in some aindtis a nght to sue. he action confirmed. 1omj>so! k htrunii,-, i, Q. J,. K, 20r,, S. C. 1879. 41 Seimestre — 'J'u an action bv a seiiueslre to set asiile a |)ivleiided donation of the propei-tv se(|iiestrated,lhedelendaiit [.leaded Hrst I'v ah ex«'l)tion to the form, which was dismissed anil afterwards to the merits, denyin.r the riglit ol a sequestre to bring such aiTlion— //«/'/, that he had such right as the action was one ol adn stnition nierelv, and that tliere was a wule distinction between an action to annul an instrument valid prima fucieiwd one to have it ileclared thai it is mill aireadv and o no eilect. Lajran,\H:ke v. L>' Amour, 42. .Surety.— \n endorser of a note mav bring action as .surety against the maker in onlJr to se,-ure him-Tll, though the note be not in his VI. CrtLMlNAI, COKVICTIO.V A Bar TO. «. Where a carter had been arrested lor loi- teriiig, and was tried before the Recorder of Montreal and convicte,l-//tW, that thou-h the conviction may have been wrong and iniiust, that, nevertheless. It was a complete bar loan action ol damages tor want of reasonable and trerU-en, S. 0. 1879. 44 And in an action of damages for assault, to which the defendant pleaded that he had been already haed in the Uecorder's Court- nel,l hat a conviction in such case mav be pleaded in liar of any other proceedin>'R, either civil or criminal, for the .same cause.* Ta^ta- hanAirnicent, ;{ L. N. lo4, S. C. K 1880 4.x But ill aiiotliercase-7/,/d, that it must be VII. Cr.MULATIOX OP. 46. Plaintift alleged that defendant's cattle came on hi.s property and caused damages, and cone uded tor damages and a line. Defendant pleaded cumulation of aotions-//eM, that an action Of damages, which is purely a civil remedy i.s incompatilile with an ae:tion fotjvhne, and that the two could not be joined 14 e.xoept when expre,«sly authorized by statii'te; '"" 'l">t. iM the instance in .lue.stion. the; were perfectly ju-tiHed bv C. .S. L. ('. ea„ '>(; wind, ntd not lK.en repealed by the JIunlcipai ( «le, under which the action was bron^dit a k, lor damagc.s, and a fine under Art. ;!S1 o( the Municipa Code * lor a nuisance on a public nl ; .Ti'l'"'''' ''>■,"■"■"' "''i'^'"!"" defendant had placed there; the cumulation was held not to lie authorised and the demand to la,;.' ;;T''7'; J^l'"'^^' * (^'■^'"""' 7 U. L. :l25 Jlag. Lt. Ihit. ' 4,s. An action en der/„ralion ,le Polernil,' .iiui o,.,,,a,i,te,i,u,,.etur,liechil,iinayl,ejo,ii"u . action ot damages for the niother resulnn.r 4 Q^'VurcHl-. iS;'''^''''-"''^' "^ ^^'"''''^ 49 The appellant .Mie,l the respondent on a ease, and joined with the action' a count (or r';/ / • ';i ' ''^''''''-''''''I't pleaded bv e.rc,;>/ioa A< "/.« t lat the action was loimded upon .shoii d be held I,, make option between the dif- erei.t deman.ls-//,/,/, that Arficl.dSt of the Code o Procedure had added nothing to the ol,i . w ; It did not pretend to alter it in any wav. It laid down the rule that several cau.ses of ac- 1011 may be joined in the same suit, provided ley are not incompatible or contradictorv, t hey .seek condemnations of a like nature that tlieir,]oinder is not prohibited bv some e.-:' press provision ami (hat tliev are susceptible of .!::/!''.'" ""."'« ^" "-iah Tl,e.ioi,ider'ii. tins case The .same mode oi was not i,pen to any form of' olyecti,',n'.- .lemainls were clearlv susceptible of the Mo iiicompa- sanl'/nV'hn'nf "°'' "''"". "'" ''""'"^ of a"y OMO of as mmmBS£m /arther pr„eW„y^,i^'^ ^ini^ '^'^ i' " came. /6., sec. 45. crumnal, for 'e -ame tll.illtv T I "''"■''"'"' '•'"'"■o wa- no , nconuia- Ueel^ Dairy (J,,., Q. B. 187(i. "^ IX. En Boknagk. JLt" ""7'".'="^o''>',J"dg"ient in an action where l''V"'''"i"'" " ^""'""^'-' '"'"'"I'' ""^^-'^^^ leie the boumiarie.s are to t.e placed, and if it does no d,,, so, and there is no antecedent re- port establishing the position of the boundaries, the arpentenrc^iu only proceed to place the boundaries with the consent of the pa -ties, and on ob.serving a I the fbrmalities required bv lav Brown. k Perkins, 10 K. L. 427, Q. B l.s8l) ol. An aclioii ,.,(/„;ni«ye, alleging that the proper V of the delcMidant adjoin.? that of I e aittr on a certain side, is maintainable, though It be proved thai his propertv adjoins on Q.'1i.'T87'G "^'"'■'^ * ^'"^""'' « «• ^■^^> the eeveralportiLsoV^fl^'dmUntSur "' '""'» "^'Wicr ''.. -' - ■i^-m-r\ pro,.,.c.,i,„..s of a siiwcvor i , X': l"!'^'- I" Mid. an ,Mi,.,-l,M-i,t„n. nni;.i- 011,1,01 l„. u;;!';l:;a;^';i:''''-''-'i--'-"u,i:,;:;;::;,i ■')(!. Aid when tlio ,.„,«,. i„i,„|„,p„ ,.,,,,„,,,,. . ,,^ tliOMiin,. M..|,s as ,|,„,e cn„,.vr„i„. , . , ^-.rvvor „n,sd( |,„,,,, „,,ness,! " 77 u e v .)!. And «„.,•(. n ,„.,.„„„ |,n„i;s an action ^„ ^•;,"'T'' T""""* '"■"^■i"'"' -'""'""1 .^< in" ' Mi,i. (. ii( wlj he <',,n,l<.ninr, l<> i.av die omu X. En Comi'i.aintk. ';y,;;::'">''''^;vl-.al<..posH.si„non e ,, t' A'F. En Dkclaration dk Patkhxitk. IK ;^ ' • '"'",' '"' "■■'"' '""•" i" January \y, lUYonlin^. tnlHTslovv, l.ul.a.-cor.iin." wi' I>.'>'io,- Lnv,(.nc;e. ,„ Jainiarv, |S74. I or 1 c,.rrob.„a(o t u. ,s,m..n„.„t- of t|,.. „, |, I, , ACTION. 16 :'a;;"iv;;i,"^.''';7 '"'•'?*- «- •'I . An action in .lcdarati.,ii of .Mvtcrnitv and lor inaintcnaricc (or tj,,. cliiM ,,,. I, • ■ i "itl. an action of .iaina -pm ( r ■, '',"""''•' XII. Kx DkstITI.TION UK Cl'KATEU.E. lie l,vc,| III Ontar (). u,d tlial i,l.i,„7 ir , II..' pica was ,l,,s„„sHc,| on ,l,,„,„rrcr. L^Te- Xlir. En Garantie. ofLud.,,ndorHn.;di.ri;.'rnU^;;S;:;^ '' j';'l-'..Mnl)' him against an action' Cid.t 'j> the Attorney (Jeneral for ami on helnll^ ■ C1H77. """"'' '^ "'•• ^1 ^- ^'- J- aii s! •J's. Hi,,! wi n„k ,'b L?, i'*' ,V I"-"'"'"*'".""' "f til.. ,mr. C. (■ I'. ''""''-™ "' "'0 "nme iimiinorn,s experts. 943 «l'l'K>i'',n-ir';4V(-'1-'p'' "'""' """■ '""■ '•'"•.'y"r may b- •iaruC. orZ;;n.ir;";^,";^ verm-ing of anef..,,, boun- f.".niiy wi,h",'i ,'",^,1 ,1^;;','.. '''■;?, r •"•"".^-'^ '" <•"»■ d.no In- tl,e rcrso,,'^ „„ ' I ' I, "' '" r"''^. «'"i is ^",";-^ ^j^^;>; ;;;':;;;;i:'"-;'' >-%; i^lioil^mid- i^e: C.C.J'. ""'''"'*'*" «"oli etutemeiit into courL 945 COUNT.'^'* R^fi'iTioN i.E Cojti-TE, see AC- a.iM„,ii,str.uio,. of y:;«. H,;' :„ r^'^)!;; f" « Hpo.deii, p,,,.i„ce,. „„ aecount, uul no ilie^l" p-i--rwiti,in.^,!v'S;e.i''N;:c:s' "» wa.s ,„a,ie, and apj.ellant.s were (orecloid lioin cont..«tii|,r— //,,// ,1,,,, ,, I ,i"rfi-io»e(t nHjst.p.^in,aM,ed'''A,;;&/S,rSir •1.0 ^"mo"f..'nn/'^:';f'7„7™"h",'J'':i! "■ ♦-r/o^l^f"" Of clmich. each IT..I ■. m c. rr n^ "" ^"".'"l'^ l^'Huh n>II.M„u« com,,,, !, .„ tl.';rt' bv Z'^^''^" '"• """"■• r<'Kister«.PBcl,ofwl,icliis« lm„ti/ ^ '".■'I'^P "Ucli a,ill,c., ity. 42 ( • c »">"™tic, and iias In law equal 'i»i>,bor.dorl,,i,,^ttl" Inili^.*^^' '"■"""""'"h'v or cleric <;•,!,. „f ( ivil lSure."4;T^TV"'r"&l !!? ."^° . J6, page vl. C. C & 800 Note to Art • s^.y-i. .;.■,-. ■, "^ .CTION. 16 17 < kept l,v tho ininiMter, norsB "•(pr. I'iif |iH|,(r HUH not Nicr, l,ii( l,v o,„. (^Impnian. iruil (le h,i),l,'me iicconlinir iI(im|,..» Aciiu, (liHiniHHed •■oliiriitidii of jiiitcriiitv oik! "k' cliiM iimv he joiiu'd iiMii;,'i.,s ibr the mioHht re- liioliun. h'i,i,/.-iMlrncMt,1in(l I i-incf njiinicii arni wan > her liulu'v (i,r Nii|),K,rt. I'll oil licniiirr-cr. U,/,/e v. - N. IGO. & 24L.'0. J. •OH/'fi will not lie against xeciiiivc liy ii purchaser r in council to >;iiai-antee nii'^t an action hroiu'ht nil lor and on liehalf ot' «' the (1(.(.,| ol' sale on the the sale itselt was vl/ra II "US executed without fii<-!/Oenm,U. Middle- ni, 21 L. 0. J. 31!). S. ' DE CoMi'TE, see AC- gilt hy appellants «i ol the respomient's H. s estate. The re- account, and notified ly ('onteHtation which make to the account J'taied. No coiitesta- I'llanls were foreclosed tliat the loreclosiire "■/ & l{ ; 627 & 630 icr bPil in two roglsters of I Homnn Calliolic piirUh !i or coiif-reKation or other 1 by iuw to keep suoli ™tic, iindDaainlawequiil 't niiiBt, at tlie (nstnncoof ('(I to oiip oftliii Jiidepsof prothoiiotary of tli,j dis- Jiilt (.'(Mil t Instc'.d of the led 111 the Statute 25 Vie. lirolh"iiotnrv or clerk uniicr priwrrihi-d hj> iho • C. & 8oe Note to Ait ACTION. cos s paid the taxed costH ol the op|Kisite partv '" "'^ "" '■'■ '"ill obtaineif distraction, to the atlornev who but under reserve of their rights in case the judgnuiit should U^ reversed, The ju.lgnient w'as reversed and the tiiaiiititf then sued the att.jrney to whom he had paid to gel his inouev back on the ground of having paid in error-^ Jletd, there was no error, and that the attornevs having obtained dislraclion he had no ri.'lit to Tc'\m ' ^' ^"'''■*""*' •' Q- L- «• 19, 69. The husband of the plaintifi-in order to raise money mortgaged her property without her know edge or consent. ^Having therein- ''V;.'1^:'-^J -^Hf liable to imprisoimient li vile in order o secure his liberty became bail tor iim, and the bail being in time forleit, sold a por lonol the profM-rtv and with the pi'oce.ds paid of the an.ount This transaction Veing s on 1 r. r '"'1' "" "'"^ ■^"""•tii.K'ufterwntere«t. In the court ol' flret instance, ehe ACTION. (> J. Proceedings between partners en rtddi- ,'.','" . Z"i'J'',^ "'""' )"ii-ii'<''-^liip. Ihinrnnin k riante, !) It. h. 401, Q. H. 1H76. f>^^. 'I'lie apiiellaiit brought suit against the respondent, alleging a piircha-e by them jointly ot certain promissory notes aiidHecurities'whleh the respondent collectc.i for their common pro- tit, the aiipellant's share acknowled.red by the respoiiilent being $-l;t.7.V The appelant ."idded tlie coniMion asHiimpsit counts, and prayed tor an account in the usual Ibrni with vouchers, and that in delimit the resiiundent should be com emned to pay the said Mini olJi7l;(.7'}- //,/,/ on demurrer, that the demand Ibr an account was not warranted by thi- allegations of the plauitill s declaration, and was not the pmiier remedy lor the cause of com|.laint theridn ^ h'mi ' '"' '^ ^^ ^' "• ''"^' XV. E.v Reinteoiunde. (i6. In an action en rvi„t,',,rnnde the plaintid alleged a public and peaceable possession of more than a year and a day » titre dnnoprie- Unre, ami generally a pnssesfion of upwards of twenty years prior to tfie 1st May, Lsic ,but in Ins answer to the delendant's plea that his nos- - session up to IKoO was Ibr his son, and fh,ni IHub was as usulructiiary only, and no interver- sion was proved-7/<;/(/, that the action was l.r(merly dismissed. Uhicard v. Uikoim, 24 L. C.J.47,H. C. U. 187!). ' XVI. En Remere. (i7. Action en remiri under a deed of sale 1 lie court at .Sorel dismissed the action on the ground that the phiintitfliad not tendered the price, and besides that the action had Uen institute,! too late, being returned alter the ex- piration ot the delay fixed Ibr the exercise of the privilege of remiri. Judgment conHrmed. XVII. En Repetition, nee PRESCRIPTION. fi8. Plaintiff having brought an action in the Superior Court, which was ilisniissed, wished to appeal, but in order to avoid giving security for 18 obtained judgnientncconling to herdemand but in revision, the defendant U'lng held to liave ;<'en in g.H.d laiih, intiTest was only allowed Irom date of service of process, and this jiidg- inent was conlirmed unanimously i,, appeal.* Sfr^si^-'lSa'cl'---^''^-^-^-'^'^''^^- 70 Resp>iident purchased from aptiellant hifl rigli sand pretensions in a certain lot of land in Westchester, whudi he had occupied Ibr several years and which W ged to one C in Tpper Caiia.la. He paid $50 cash, and gave two notes for the balance. Alter he had b.-ei, in possession a year, C, the proprietor, turned up to sell the property he owned there. AoiHdlinf, who occupied the lots adjoining, enterecf into a lea^e with the proprietor, and res|,ondent's lot with his consent was included in the lease, and le continued in possession without trouble or earot trouble. He alterwards brought ai^tion to recover his money from appellant, »u the ground that the latter ha.l guaranteed his possession In appeal, reversing j,„li:mrnt of (ourtot Review, action dismissed, buhoisw. C'rotmu, H R. L. 245, Q. R. 1870. 71. Taxes paid under an existing bv-law of a l^orporation cannot be recovered until the by- law las beiMi set aside. Chiel v. Vitu of Mon- liml, 1 L. N. G4, S. C, 1H77. 72. Where action is brought to recover taxes paid under an illegal assessment roll, if the assessment roll is a,lmitte,l by the plea it is not necessary lor the plaintiff lo produce it in court. 2S.'c.^.i.^;oi,';j^fiS"«''2'^'^--^^».* 73. Where a person borrowed $50, and the eiider got l.m, to sign a note for $58, supposing t to be for $oO, not having read it, and nothing having been said about the $8— //,./,/ that having paid the amount of the note to a third holder, he was entitled to an action en reiiHi- Lemire & Gelinas, 10 R. L. 20, C. C. 1879. XVIII. En Re^olction DB Vente. 74. Under the Contume de Paris the trans- ferree pure and simple of a prU d,' rente niav exercise the action en rexohti n de vmt« for default ol payment either total or partial The lU'tion may also tie brought ior dcfani de pre.t- (a/wn oi a constituted rent, price of an im- moveable, even by the seller who has sueil Ibr XIX. En Separation de Biens. 75. There is no community of property between persons married in a li.reign 'co.lntry and who afterwards .!ome to Quebec to live, unless there is proof that they married with the intention ot coming there to "live, and therefore an action of separation of j.roperty in such ease S^ 0. 1879 , & JJaltou & Kiny^ R. L. 548, S. c! 19 ACTION. vlfl XX. En Skparation ue Corps. ACTION. where sViH, if,, . '- » "'''"'K^iliftiion, and cmu'n.";r Jfii';'t::;i'''';^^r';'''-f''- -'-&X/./W,2L:];rSs.(?Tl«7!/'" ''^•'''^- ^"^ f'"'*' *'0B Mkasur.nu Timmkk. «n,,ervisoi < c 1 ph I 'o,', r""- ""'''"•""' XXII. For JiiQioR. on tl7e pre i'o t "^■^"■ke'eperH to l,e.lrn„k when U ,,,;,. 'r "'■', "'"" "•«^''I'«''-S even 18;j, C. C. 1S74 ^'"'^""" ^- J''f><>'>/, 7 K. L. XXIII. Form of. to"\^^Sr'?^J^;»,rlS»«-!-ntnn,ler- n.a.le several re.m rl /n "'^"l'l',''l'i'i". »n,l he pieawl;:,h^r •^;;:i;:,:;';t';.'"Tr'"'' '•■'- plaintiff iL.M^i:^;'':;;;;=/'-.''' "'"'"- ^ XXTV. For become d„r;;,Xr°^7 """^1^ ^""^ ''"«'»"'l to al.an,lonir. e emi?er'aT,r?e.>" ''T'^^ ''- f^eeiire tlie rent ic .^ i ■ '^'^ ""thin.' to S. C. H, 1879! ^lanchard, 2 L. N. 331, Rent, see LESSOR AND XXVr. For Ta.xes, see TAXES. 81, A lessor has no rl,rl,t t^ taxes dne nn.ler ti.e lea'e ' ,. I . "1 '*'';"" ''*^'" Pai' to the Cirnn,..,,' ,i"' '"" '"»^ liimself SERVANT.^"" ^^'"'"' *«" MASTER AND wn?e;/lh:"a::::.„n^ ^, '•"^^'''""•S''d '^-v-ant for Q. B. 1877 ^^""'^'""""& '^"«o«, 1 L.N. 40, 20 XXVni. IIvi'oTiiECARv, see HYPOTHEC. p.-?'thaul;^'Ss"i!i°""'r''''^"'''»'""'^ '■•.less he nrefe rs , . ' '-[''"'•■".ned (o pay o"".leto 1 ,n an. i, .""' ''o-"">o-' had heen cliarjred tl e o , ," '"''T,'''''''''r """ '"' ''is- tl.erel,y\leprived I ;„ . ■ ' ^'".l '.'""," "f ''ad not reoo.„4a,!.!;::rlhl::K,,;l'"v■^^"^"-u^y pi^;.S':nd*^;:.^rE„:k'ii?r'" '° "'<• property insnre.l l,v v . '"'''P '=<''"'"''' f^ai.l hypothec fL r a , I, ' ' ''"'''''''' '""''''• '/-.K.l.^;ahr^I:s :i't;;i;.r7'"'■ and re«istratior,-//. ' '•V"'',"'^ '•O'^t ol deed ".i it a'£ra;;,.;r'r '-or charges are brit).' livpothe ..?> V " "'• '■''''' '■■'^"'"' "'ay of the mCeal e am,?," T'l"''' '^ "^'''^"'^""^ lation to at e bt '?,'"''/''7'-' 'T n" --tipu- beS;,J'e.fi:::f j WHl,ecary action cannot ^ion of i.ntnovTb eZS'Tf-l''° 'V" !'""''*«- debto^'r: ecu rv'mwSi'',rr^'^'"-"'' '■-'"'■"•« h.vpotheca y mion Z t T '"■"'^''" Defendant pleade nhaUlLT""./'" '*'""'""• could only be bro u. 1 ''ypot hecary action and not a.-ainst t^I o^*"*'"? "^ ''^" '''''««'««•, Simultaneo " I'y vitt th 'fjl'irj ^,7"^ ^^',"°''' ■ tift'filed a desdemZf. ,1^,^ °' ,""^ P'^a plain- sions, and X?ed ,u., ry';-:;P?:,^'r«'--'' «onclu- personal conde.nna, n-i/iy' bat","".'' '°'"/ erins of Art. 20.58 of the Tiv I r ) .i"'"',*''" "'« bad a perfect ri -L .., h ^V'^*' tbeplaintitf sions; bu that hav f ' l-ypothecary conclu- option of payh . tbl'"^ f'? ^be defendant the anSintoSf::'?;:;;^^,:;*' -l-tever the | action a.-ain-t his /, i, , ' i , "" by pothecary i able hypo'l o' ; ' ,T^• '"','''^'" '^'^ "'^' i""nove- .^" mpo.,.,ccated, although he has already a "|^ DTION. 20 KCARv, see HYPOTHEC. ^••yiictionthoplaintifr.nay I'M t 1,0 coM.len.Me,! (o pay "ii'iloM.iiltl.oiiKliAi't. 20«"1 ■yx Mint the hvputluHriiry ' |l<;l''iHlant condnnnt",! (o ..(■Icr. tr, pay. i,,,/,,,^ j^ ■ »J • 1 n I ;j . plaintiff l,a that he, lis- ;«'nallv without,,,.. vat ion '"ft the phiintiKhaii not ■^I'll of Ills ll.v^K)thecury ii'mhint. Id. ^ 'cil a liypothec to the ifrt()oi< to kwp ccrtuin '.V ol collalcnil m;urj|y 't. a tl.inl hol,i,.,-, ,„„|^; ^"'•(■ilius u,i,j i,icon,nu. i'l<''l lour itfriLs of six "n.s ,,ai,| (or sui,| j,,^,,^. 1 lilty ceiitH oostoldecd p tliat tljei-e was no '»nt>, and thi-relbre no who Has a nice holder pay lh<.n,. MMum & . t>. C. 1H77. hose liivor charges are 1011 of real estate may I' against the delenteur iigli tliei-e he no stinu- ,''e.ieed. Dufresne & '• io77. ation of a Iiypothec for brought in the Cii^cit Q- L. It. 322, C. C. liecary action cannot igneewhoisin jiosses- ■ty of an estate in liis & Fiil/oii, 1 L. N. '' iimnediate debtor.— a niortgage from his Jt afterwards Itroii.rht ?cover the ainomit. ' liypothecarv action ^^^^ & tiers ddenteur, 'al personal dehtor. 'igofthe plea plain- liypothecary conclu- to the demand (or a 'Id. that under the •il Code the plaintiff ypothecary conclii- n the defendant the ^or ahandoning the l''aw that option aa piivethe defendant rd, 21 L. C. J. 157, or, whatever the ^e an hvpothecary lerofthe inimove- iie has already a i f 21 ACTION. ACTION. 99 judgment against the sa{>l dehtor iiersonailv for the same claim. Dnrml A Boucher, t; U. L U lyr, S. C. 187!). XXX. In Kjectml'nt. 91. Detendaiu was employed as a scliool- teacher hy plainlifls, with the privilce ol occii|.ying the Fchool-liouse as her resiifence ller engiigeiiKMitliaviii'^ iieen ileclarod at an enil • liy a resoliiiioi, ,,f il,,. plainlifls, she persisted against their will, in oc.;iipyi,ig the sclio,j|.|ioiise — //<'/(/, that an action to eject her iiiuler Art HH7 ol the Code of Procedure* would have to he djs- niisse,! for want o( JiiriMlictioii, there heiii- no lease imd no occupation wi'h the consent orthc pn'pnetors of the nrennses. Sr/,ool Commit- simiers of SI Damd v. Decarenne.s, 4 y. L. ]{. • ' ' * S y.' . \i, 1 H 7 H ■ '.»2. J5iit an action in ejectment may h,) hrought hy a suh-tenant ■igninst his immediate Jess(,r under a lease, to ohtaiii possession o( the |)i(;mises. Jaeger v. Sauce, 1 L. N. Lit), S. C i't""!, ".,«":'.'■',;''■ •^I''"'''''"' nrn,n,e&: h„.,on. ueuidt, ,{S. C. Kep. 102, .Su. Ct. 1H71». !l(i. Action to recover the value of a car'o of peas lost on the scow Marie .I.weph, in conse- 'liience ,,( a collisi.m with a steamdoat !K>lo,i.r. "|>;.to delendimts in I,acliiiie Canal. Pint that plaintiff had heen jiaid the value of the peas l,y the insurers, for whom plaintills were a mere inSIr iiom and had no interest- //Wr/, cnfirmin.f t lejiidgmeiit of the Cmirt helow, that, iiotwill" standing the payment f,y the insurers, the utter had no right to sue until notice of the tniiisler a,„l siihrugalion, and the actio,, was properly l.rought. IMi./i,,,. .t Ooforio Mn-/- w'l)"" iMfreniire, 2 L. N. 204, (J. li. XXXII. Nati'kk of. XXXI. Interest ts, see KtuiiT of. 93. Tlie appellant was collocateil on the pro- ceeds of the estate of one Lemieu.x, insolvent, lor the amount of a mortgage. Theresp„iideiit contested the collocation, on the ground that the mortgage was given in Iraiul of the ri-hts 01 the cre.litors of tic mortgagor, who Was insolvent at the time t„e mortgage was given- Iled, overruling the decision of the Court lieuw, that as the contestants wei- not shown to have heen creditors of the mortgagor at the tune the mortgage was given that tliev were without right and interest to contest Jn that ground, and the collocation was maintained.t Q H.Ts'vy ^^'••/'«««'*' ^^'""^•. ;i L. N. 20, 94 The appellant hrought opposition in his quality ol tutor to his minor ,son, to the se.zure of an immoveahle in his jiossession on the I grou.id, wier alia, that the immoveahle in ques- tion formed part of the community hetween ; I'KMselt and his .n(e deceased-W, that he , wan without interest to oppose tliJ .seizure \L.tJeb\:re v. Inrgeon, 3 L. N. 20, Q, B. 1880. _ 95. And where one S. transferred his interest : under a certain lease and in certain furniture to ^ appel ants, "acting as trustees for ami on hehalf ;^ of divers persona and firms, creditors of the I f'aiil 6., under a certain [laper-writing or , nemorandum ol agreement male and eniered \\ nto hy and hetween the said S. and his cre.li- , tors and hei'eunto aniie.xe.l "— //e/,/ i„ an > ac ion by appellants.in their quality of" trusleea i duly named of the creditors of .S.," tlia they ■haJ- no right or standing to appear as s cli 8tn.ulHti.mr,,f , ,,. 1 L "^ C'.iilriivention of any of tlic ate«stX?"ln.*"l3jil"5. V"" "' '"'' """«»' '"' ""« »•> 97. The plamtifl, a .imlgment creditor of on* the deleiidants. hrought action in the district 01 Montreal to set aside a deed of sale of real eHtate situated in the district of fherville, from the ludgment dehtor to the other defemhmt- JieM,w ileclinafory e.tception. that such action was a purely personal one, and « l"*'l a^ toall-7/tW that as the action was allowed to certau, relations hy .special statute, „nlyo,,e C. c. V. ''^"t 'a dispute '9 situated. 37 28 ACTION. !!•!! Im m n m i i M till- Hluire c 1 n*- ?'''''^''' ^" '"«"ilM.te A"'/. 1 L. N. 129. y U. is7"y';^ ^'^'"'"'"^ (^0- & XXXV. On Bets. ba(tP„„, having h .erte.l a riw " ""'"■•''" '''''' plovcl to\v"rk A 1 •'"' '^"""'?^ woretM,,. abet l.(>iiv,.,.n ,1 "" '^''"'■'Iv l.('( orp (br Im'i'aid^^vs^E^:;;'];:^, -';'•''''; -s Coiiiimny deftMi,!' it Im . * '"""'" "' """ bntaV.er tie :, ,; ^^ i','"; K "■^";'' "'" <••»«". ei'large,!, and il,; '.„,'•■ "' .'^'- ^''.iHeuii was been ttse I o ,vi ,;'.?'' '" ,":''''^'' " '""^ cuhr~J/el]l that h«, ""'^"''' !" ""'^ P'^^ti" within the exoeut oi r7l ""r^'".''" "^'^ «""'« action wouinfe^or l^p ''"' '""■'"'"' ""it no on M.ch a r ace • tLl '7T7 "' " ''^^ ""'''« between the pla.^ .•''"-■ /''T'' "'"^ "" bet the action wC .r i "'"' '''■'5-'"l""t, and that plaintiff' or of G ho ;n"A';.'' ^''^ '"*""' "'' 1877. ■' "ume, 6 y. L. K. 37.J, S. C, ^-lon.htr:i":L^i;;?t/^°-'T'^" bad CoS ;;nra i" on"ti, '"' "■'"^'' ''"' '-- Winner knew tlie r^nhnf H *-"■';'"" "'=*' "'« ACTION, AND notes!' '"'•'■' "" '^•""■■'' mi-LS Hut if the moneyTrtl/whnvP P"""B.coj.tracfor bet^ cJ!;5/!^':^^LlX'l^''l,f^^!;,,?''?'''-'' 'n the pre. rii0O8 and other fewfu Ea/.Z" ""A:',' '""•'"? «>"> f"Ot nV'i»"y anil addr.w ; i ,.v?.r h 1 ! i"'' "'''""''' '""'ily appear, to be exoeseive 1928 c'i' ""« •"'" denmnded IIH. S. C. 1876 ^Varchand, 21 L. C. J. ...iHorv^'o?i,'u,''',;r"'' ^ "" ««"•<"' ^n a pro- rejecle;^ Z u^^'^'T'^ I'.Vttllidayit wifi be a^ihist't tr ,;i<;r,nr ""^'^ r'- XXXVII. 0.V FoHKI,i.V JUDOMKNT i^j-v.cw;^"^rs'2;'r;;^:'i^^s:s;t taSh.'.'re l7'' °" «Jl");.'...ent Obtained in On- enlille,! to r ai-e . v ,7- •'' "'t'. '^ ^^"^ '"^t S. C R. 1878 '"• ^- ''• I'^S, & 1 L. N. 78, 'iefi-miant ift;::'r ^''"*i'>^'g"4'.nent a.ain.t costs, and on the I Tti, r . f^^^^-^'*, lor .lebt and I'e b'ro.Sht action n . 1 « r ?' """ ?'*"'*' >'''»' Quebec, S„ the T.ment-^;W ;?.f V'"*"-"' ^ucii cases a delbnTl mft ,-7 '. """ *''''^''« '» "I'ere I.eappearJe e fn r""''^'' PefHonally, or be allowed^ elat V ; " P ''""' ' ""'"°' an action is brm,?rh to i r '■°^"""' •'" ^^'''«b «hat he n.i 'ht 1 aV.^ enforce such ju,l.,nent bi'-'ance K l''r /''^"'^''i '," 'be first S. C.lt. 187U * ^«"^"»> 2 L. N. 117, TOrS^"^' "" O^I-'OATION SlONKD By At- 111, Appellant sued resnondent fr.^ *i ^X ,:" :";"l"",'"^ °^>''S' -ecu ed t and n.e.aio,,^d" 1 'nat re J^t r' .!f' "''^'^'. attorney, its date andirregis ration ^Thl t*"* -an::^te^'^^"^--"S""twasItS jnd;^^;. ,rby\ieL';rit'wh:n" •'''" '"''^•"'^<'^' '■°^ M.isse,! by the To,., " bis action was dia- I ^^^^^- On- Pen-altv i.v Contracts. BomhZ^l^- P"'''"'' '" "'*' ""*"«« baving been aouit time ,u commercial partnership and wisu" M OTION. 24 'diction on it and brinirine > ft diHtriot (lim.rcnt Iroin ^oiil.l otlieinviso l.iive U-vn & Marc hand, 21 L. C. J. '«/(! to an action on a nro- !)p()r(c,l hyiidiilavit will be Laprixe & Met/,,,/, 4 on a proinJNsorv note the "I tlic pliiintKr, Ntrike out "■"'; Jj"t nrAu.l in tlie •• Mckuiyht, 22 L. C. J. f two proniisHory notes )I«T may Hue on tlioni fivnt u,;iu,nH. LaliberU •1^)S. C. 1879. I(!N JUDOMKXT. iintiff s„al on a foreiVn dt;darntion a,|,|o,) 00111^3 filinj; any statement a ^I'lf,' tliat procecilinfTH be ^iil of account was filed. '•- 21 L. C. J. 28, S. C. d^rment obtained in On- tedihiif tliemwDnionH in » served personallvnpon lleM, tiiat lie was not JPiHion wliich lie iiiiKht ""I suit. Akocketal. ■ 145, & 1 L. N. 78, lined judgment against ion Pleas, Ont.,on the or «255.25 (or debt and etoberoCthe same year lie district of Ottawa, —Held, that where in H served personal! v, or lotsoserved, he cannot he irovince in which 'niorce audi judgment pleaded in tiie first mon, 2 L. N. 117, TION SlONED BY AT- respondent for the bligation executed bv attorney of liis wife ' obligation was filed, ■e of the power of ■egistration. The de- id default was entered irt' then inso-ibed for 1 his action was dis- moiu, on the ground WU8 not proiliiced in nt was sustained in :!e, 7H. L. GU, Q.fi. N Contracts. cause iiaviiig been irtnership and wish- £S ACTION. ACTION. 26 ing to wind up, agreed to appoint arbitrators aniltouliidc by their decision siricllv as by a judgineiit of Hie Superior Court nnder"a penally 0l$ ,000. The arbitrators were apiMiinted and CoihliiMn.'d (be deltMidant to restore to the pluin- ti/I c.Ttuin niercbaiidiseaiid pay hini besides a bulunce of $lW.r,(). The lirst part of tli ■ award was ininu-W, that nluintiti could only claim the penalty in ca-e it lift.! iKcn Miipulateil for simple delay" in the ful- liliM.Mit ul the award, which was not the case in the in>l.tiice, nor was there the slightest proof or iiidicalioii that such was the case, an'l all Mesuiiiptioii of such a thing was taken away Ly the great dispiop.rtion between the anioun't 01 the penalty and the aiiioiuit of the award- and as there weiT other tilings remaining to be done on both sides un.ler the award the plain- till bad no right to the penally, and the action was properly disniisse.!.* Upine & Fktt, 10 K. L. loA, Q, B. 1871). XL. On SfiiiiTY Bond. 113 To an action on a surety bond in appeal oneof thedelendants pleadeii he was in- solvent and the plamtili ough ,,ave bad anotlier named in his stead, and also that the ajiprllant was insolvent and the assignee to bis estate ou.'ht to have been called \n~Ueld, dis'- r^^tiitA^. ^''""' '■ ^^'•^"^"'•' ' SLI. On Unsigned Notarui, TaANSFiiR. 1 bl . The action was brought on a transfer, and the notarial copy produced was not signed by the notary-/ye/,?, that this omission was fatal. Ibere wen- also other irregularifiPs. Judgment ot the Court of Review, which dis- n.is^ed the action, confirmed. liicker & Simon, XIJI. Pktitort. 115. On appeal from a judgment of the Court of Queens Bench (br Lower Canada (appeal side), compelling the appellant to pay $100 damages lor acts of trespass complained of by respondent in building on a mitoyen wall with- out notice and without estimate-ZA-M, that the action was in the nature of a petitory action or the recovery of pioperty, and tlie demolition of works completed may ' properly s:fiffS;x!i,t??' -^^^-^^^i erectal. The pluintitf was the%wne. of an contrary. II35 C. C. undiyided eighth of the real estate in question, andthedeendanl, who bad been in possession ol tlie whole of it up to the time of tb,. iustitu- ion ol the action, denied the right ol the plain- ifl to any part of it. The plaintilf thereupon iTougbt petitory action. In review the delen- danl adinilte,] the right of the plaintiir loan eighth, but argue■■ «"'vn, wherein it is situatwl «n>oi ^^'' f"™ or concession to it should be meitlonod ?f";;' f"'^""!"«""'"»"' known ""der a part cular„,me it is i?,tS ,''"' ^ "^ '"'"' nameand ts sltrnti„i. ip.i ■ ' '" ""tnci.'nt to ir ve Its township, parishfi^"- t'.w I'lnniT"!;' '"".""■^ P"' "f «! are numbered, i Is suVi^; , t to"';'';'' '"""'- '" ^^'''ich tlledemimd relates tn-.n^ •» ."tate its number. If tion .01 sei,M.ior"a?r?«l ts't^rnv/;;? ''",'■'!"' ^'"'«'"1'- seigiiiorv, thPvinust1ie./..J '*''"-'' "'"lat nar to aiiv Virions d/tbe IcT'i^a'iV^r^l':'-,^»f^'^:''''''^JV'.0P j;*.^«,,r.';t.A:;;:;,;;;'a.'a:'5:s: i»'i:;"''i;'.,'"i;Sr;;:,,/'K;r"«f« pS,.,"r : ,.i ; f ";,T.i"i'.v "1" «"""■",'"• ■'■"<■ An 7tw '.r ,, . "^ ' ''.^ tie?i)uri-(T a.><(.il on /te/ 'Vrr' "! '';'""'=i'''«y i„ the o! to h' XLViri. QIM.VTU.M Mkiiuit. vei?!'i,T'r' " '}'■''■'"'" '"*'' "■°*'"' fo'- several to'tTi'rcTu^iiiii'ijfir'the iir,™ "'/.'""i! ""^ '-'•^"^y a, rielitswhich beIo"Vt it Z w Iho*",-!^"-' ." """veys^all ml-'bt have ev.rcTsed anr? „i , ' '" J'K'ement . ' ^- "■ '** 1 Muurov. LalonUe, 13 L. C. J. 130. " tie.i iiic Mio Mil dum'.s pi'aviiij Tlie del liave b( nitinlulj the eou a CurpL iiuiiiitai with CO. C. C. It i;u. I pal Co>l 64, is til action j any pei> . the heai Miinicip » It. I.. ;!2 l;i2. A for the alleged I ' ing vote , election '? the Pari; $ animals I'oi ^ t Telle p ai Sonne iiiaji SJ cousoil au "-^-t* -■'■ CTION. 28 49 ACTION. w ili.it.iissp,|. T/wman & l.Q. H. IH77. pliiiiKiir, by writiiiv', pur- •M'liint 22C,:> conlH „C «;.,„|, '"'' I'fiviH," (in- (lie siiiii (if line writiiii; iiitll not recover. " JM/oni/e d- If. 1H77. i;'|iiiit ()(• a ilefioieiicv in 11(1 imivliiiHeil l,.v i.liiinti/r ^-c'l in till' conn of lir^, ilii;lll(|e,| loriliiiilil.'e-i ill '11 oCpiice. -//,./,/, ivver,-. f llie pliiiiitiiniii,! ji ,.i,'lit <'•< or else there vm.mM I.e iiiiiniitionot the price 1111,1 •ii>- leprivcilof „ parlor piirclmse. D„u/n,i/ & iiiit to Hell and convey title, interest, claim or l"i-s Jiail III certain lots aniai^es cuiinot he main- ort for Cailiire to deliver Jlitioned, where (hevliiiil ot to which thev had no line//, 1 L.N. 531, Q. B. the adjiiilicataire of a « sivie l.roiii-iit uppiwi- to the proceeds ol' the II the contents. The I'V demurrer hiised on i-ocediire*, which was I that the ad.jiidicataire e iiioiieys in hiicIi cane t distridiited. On the that .since the Code of tioiiol' an immeu/i/e i,s ' of it,s contents, and t by opposition ufiu de (■ proceeds of the sale, iiency in the contents. oivjmi'j, 3 Q. L. 1{. 05, ACTIOX. 30 KUIT. i? 'afiffof fines to be paid by tlio animal/i loimd estray. f '' "j "•« wncrs of ^^ «,t ?"'•"■"""" P**"' ^'''« iiituncde par tout« uer- Sonne majeure en son nom particulier ou par le chet^du couseil uu noiu de la forporatiou Muiiiei paL and .11 n of the Municipal Code.* The proof established the offence, but in his ,; inclusions the plainlill asked that the defendant be e,m- diniiied to pay #21), amount ol the liii, , hall to l.ini and half to the " Corporation Municipale de St. Ha/ile. As that was not the proper title "I. the (,orporation, the term '■Municipal" I'eiiig u.ed III the .M'lnicipal C,«le only as a t-rm of general description and not as part of the title ol any partii'ular Cor|)oratioii, and as the I'iaiiitifl had not 111 any jiart of his declaration ilescriheil correctly the ('m'puralion to which hal the Miie should be pai.j, and as jmlgmeit could not be delivered Ibr half, the action was ilismissed. (liii/iiwi V. MiirixKfite, 5 L H .34i;, C. C. 1M7!), -»..,. IV. 133. r/rddiii;/ /». -Where the declaration (in an action lor a | ally lor the iioii-re-islralioti ol a partnership) alleged in a first cuiinl that ilelendant I ir more than si.xiy ifavs beH)re the institution of the action I: .3" carried on biisi- ness in partnership with a 15 .t C, under the tirm ol ' C. A. S„ns,'\/«,. //,« ,„„.,,„.^,. „y tr„d. Ill;/ and inuiiiijiir/iiriii,/, and in a second' count tlial ilelendant (lor more than si.xtv days, etc) had carried on business in partnership with ' other persons" under the firm of '• C A & .Sons ' for trading purpo.ses, and then proceeded to allei'i. that no ileclaiation of " .saiil partner ship " had been registered as required by law— //('<'/, that the two counts reli'rred wii'li siifli- cient distinctness to the same parlMersh.n, ami nioreoyer the objection should have been speci- ally rai.se.l by a [ireliminary plea and not on the merits. MrWiZ/iam ic Findlaj, 2;, h. C. J 24,), q. li. 1874. '' - ^. "• L. Rii,:>niuiToRv. 134. Action to recover the price of a hor-e which the appellant bought from the respon- (ient. J he averment in the declaration was ha l.ie day after the sale the appellant sent back the horse as unsound, being subject to wind gall, but that reH|,omlent refn,sed to receive 1 back. It appeared froin the evidence that til" liorse was suffering from spring halt. The plaintiff moved for leave to amend, but the inotion wasrejected-yyeW, in the Court of Appeal conhriiimg the judgment of tho.Sni.erior e.oui-t, that the amendment was properly re- fused, particularly as there was no .special war- ranty, but that there was no fixed time within which the action miiKt be bt. Might, and that eiglit (lays was not an unreasonable delay with- Champagne, 23 L. C. J. 254, Q. B. 1874. i.i.j. 1 lie right to an action redhibitory is lost by a delay from the 2,ird June to 20tli .srs:'c!&Q:rT8;'7:-''"^"'-'''^^''^'^- ,lpii"^A Appellant bought a hor.se from le-spon- dent on the bth May, on the 9th he took the horse hotne. On the 2(;tli, 17 days after taking the horse hotne he brought action lb- a nee redluln/o,ve~Held, in appeal, cotifirmin.- the judgment of the court below, that while the * Qiiiponque vote i nun <5Ip,-.t)r.ii d,. rnn^nlli..,- . clpanx.sH.m avoir au nioinent o iuionm.^ it tv .''."!''" qualit^s requises d'nn eleeteur" u, ieiprei^^^^^ amende de viugt piastres. 316 M. (j"-'*""' '="^'"^' ' »"e 81 Acrricflf, CO. rt ,v,.,„l,l no U. ho,,n.| l.y .l,o n,n«- ,|«v. rnle ail ,lo«n in li.e cu-tn,„ nn,| Colkm-^,!,,, (I,p Ju.lL'.ne„i„f .1,,. court M.,w, that the .lelav wu toolu„«, „,„ ,|„. action wa« pro,«.rlv .liS^M Donthee & Murphy, 7 \.. N.S,,', y; „. j^yy' l'J7. Where tliore in ACTION. '• «irHMty the 'hill iiiiic mlhihifnry action nm.t h<. hrou;<|„ ■ „mi „i,„ .f*y8. ( V«w V. Chafer, 3 L. N 84. ri. C. IHMO, iLJ. Hkvocatohy. i;tH. Where at, op,KHant claims from an a«Hi«,ie.. Nin.l wind, the latter hohl.s „ „i"r de..,lH ot .ale. ami the vemlorH aro not i , he came, recoil rse mii.t l,e |,h,| to the lev.H'u.nrv actio,, iMwiMHi ail coM,.er„HHl,HMi:X^^^^ w/ lil I- C. J. 114. 8. U. |h77 ^^"•''""" "' "'•. n««'nt .vMident there-//,''/ M,,/ -,1 '''"'' '''' 141.. .\„d a,, absentee who has nroner'v i„ M.m I'eal ,nay 1* sued there. aLhoiii .X. ,T, ol«c.o,,didnoto,,.,,,a,ethere.and,,op,, l87y. """'"• -: i-i- iN.,i01, S. C. K.,& y. ]i 117. Defenihint, domicileilat Montreal wrote lo.he pl,i,nl,ir, a resident of Arthabaska "I 'l'""- i..f him to take chanre of !,",„. ' r niissed on e.yception ilfrlinaMre rilJ.iV. t L"pierre,4 Q. J.'. U. :m, hTrisIh * 148. The defendant pave to one K „, ";s:i,j,*!;;;;,K.'''V';;;!;,;';?;^r leli.salolpayinentsnedon it b- fore Court at Q,iebec-y/,./7, .„, lilt the action sl,oiil,| at ltiiiin,i>,ki C. C 1878. an. I on /,,, , - •■,- ;: "• Circuit ,;, . ,, . T ■"''''> "11 declliiiitorv excen- " "'"^""''"^'■"n.'-l.ouldhave been-b,'^:^, J^epai/e & Billy, 4 Q. L. ]{. sg.j, 149. Action at Quebec for the nriee nr m/^,l ""•;'' "t .Moisic, in thedisric^^ c?t's'.°IZJ^ i'ld.eiieu and not in Mo, Mreal-Viw;/ .'''".' "' IT ■ '''''''T'' "''''' " ^'''"li-'atorv^xce, iA . 14 • ;.,.nliPber of a newsnaner a, M Co. v. Cartier. 9« r r r ■1^/^'.'" (".i"'-««« trea* ' ■• h , •''f''';'"''' °'' ». newspaper at Mon- irea,, ,h.., .< l Siere copies of his newsoaner comaitrn,- .,ei'ous matter t. , ...Xer^r^' dm.iu..i :.H.iu topublic reading „omsi,, Quebec, wasoniibk. difigei,™ Bcc(,rd?ii.r f^ i'l, ^^ '"■""«''« »iil, delect and the ,Sb«o o? the p ace 4°.*.^ th'""'!''''- °^ 'i'" JWO U. C. ~ P"ii,8 wiisre the sale is matte. J.fi!le'^i,',"l^n'" "'/'''"" ^" ««'^'« "ol'f 'V Hampie ,,, Kicli,nond, in 'l,,. d,striet .if ' / I'rancis, for a iioi- e ],, Mont, i I '' itr ami i.r,i.-i.,., .,,.,. .1 „ - /■^'-M"''0" Q ca,ise v. «.w/..,-22-i: c: J. i^:c:'l '{^T"'' lo2. Action on a premium note given for .nsurance in a Mutual Insurance Cmimanv trct'o^^'nediorl'"''.''" "' ^^'""'o*'- i" tli'd": irict ot Uedlord, where the head otlice o<' (be co,npany was 8ituated. and served on le J^idaS n Vercheres. ,n the district of M,.nl real whp?e /^"i"",''"^' and wliere the note was execut^ -Held, that the action should have been t lCTION. 82 33 ACTION. lijii fliat muster in Q-iphec IL.N. 13H, &4y. L. H,8a '■ f P'''>'i"i"'>'l^neA. Uhaynon tt al., e cornpany, liaving its i»r„l iH,-uiNKit«,,oli,.i,..snt ' «i liiifhw; liv nicntiHofits -//(•.'/, ilmt iliPooMipunv ■Ix'o.iiN 111., rial.tol' B.tion I- H. 22fi, ,S. C. 1H7H. ti't' who lias Droppp'v in thcrp. nJllK.iii, I tlip n.'i,: inip Hicrc, Hfi.liiopii ..,ni.| liiin tlicr,.. ManlonnldA N..")1,H. C.K.,&Q. jj. !iii'i|pi'-kii wn.s pr<.|,,.rlv , C. C. 1878. liuni note given for Insurance Company. Waterloo, in thedis- he head office of the I served on defifndant ;t of Montreal, wherr note was executed, liould have been in AfTION-. 34 roper! V r., s. e. the or iiniiioveahleM is a real action, and dlioiilil lie hronjiht in the place where the pi-o- pertv IS situated. K/hier v. Ihrndumn't, 2 I L. N. l;-,8, S. C. 1879. 15.5. Defendant was sued on a proinissorv , note made in the city of Ottawa, where she resided, and where she was personallv served with .siiminons to appear liell.re the Superior 'oiirt III the district of Ottawa and Province o( Wiieliec— //eW, that the action was bront,'ht. Cuddy v. CnnHi « *^- 1G4 Motion lor leave to appeal from a j„d(r- iiient dismissing a declinatiu'v exception. Th- action was agaunt an Insurance Co., hy 'he cm swiiaireui a policy of insurance uponVroperty in .he district ot Arthabaska. The appl„.Iition was taken in Victoriaville in said district bv an apnt of the Co. and the action was insti- tuted there. By the exception the delendants conteniled that the action should have lH.en >i-ouglit at Quebec, where the policy was issued to the respondent. Ajipeal refused. Touriuny \.(m.iUHi Agricultural Insurance Co., .! L N 196, Q. B, 1880, LIV. SrspENsioN OF BV Death of Party. Ifi5. An ac/(o« ex delicto, which is j,.iiit and several against several persons, is not s'uMiended as to the survivors by the snggc.tion of the death of one of tl„^ defemlants, as such action may be brought . :st any one or more .>t the persons jointly ana verally liable. Allan et al. & M rLayan, 1 L, x\. 4, Q. B. 1877. •Conflrmed uaanlmoualy In appeal. 25 L C J 340 wL"r"h£ea!'""°° '"*'" '° *PP*"' ^'""^ '"<"^ judgment ii!r';| 38 ACTS OF PARLIAM ENT. ACTS OF PARLIAMENT. tl>e*^faliTi'fv" proceedi„g., were Imd attackin-. tilt \ali(litv of an acceptance of a HuccenJ m ina, e hy a ,,uo,. to minors wul, the \uivuT T fanny co„ncil_yM/, that the ac ejtance co" Id lut he pronounced nnll „, a case HhLh ' L\'H. To Set Aside Deeds of Sale. IfiT The notary need not he joined as a defen- dant „. an ucl.on to set aside a notarial deed of sale as made in fraud of creditors Vv V. Catafard, 8 It. J.. 024, S. C. 1878 ^^"""" LIX. Under Lessor and Lessee Act. Mclude a special -le.nan.fto co npVnl rLti; ' LX. Union of. ACTS OF PAELIAMENT. I. CoNSTITfTIOXALITY OF. II. iVlKHPRKTATION OF. rlr ''""MII.«AT10N OF. 1 V . Kki'eai, of. 36 "ot iruiketle^u, con r^''',"' * "•"''""' ''««« provhled that He MM? •V""-"'"-'^ "'*''«' "'"'"'e, .■ejected wihn, 1 i ".'"^""^tit'Uional part may he '" e,nplo,;i:i"ira''nSer ot' '"'17' '', P"''''« 'iH-relbre the reHnl nL /''i''''^"'''^*'''' "nd ™j. *3':s:"£",'i,p.v,t,.'l,ts'""' ''■■*'• "itereston arrears of tavp« if .?" '".P'''.';«"t. 177. BytheActofCanadaI4&|r, vv .„ I it :t't "I' ■^'' ""^ ^'"-^ "•■ ^i-^-'roai was ! :;;,T,Pe or, ..e LEGISLA- I ;«|:^ ,5^;/';^- ..ueres^ .,tiZ'':^ or taxes a da" e,sJ„e,sP""snr"- ""'";■■'"'''« am "bsli ;ie T'ano he^'"'"^ this provision, Corporation'\oi,nS'„r;:^f;-;-7^''--i'|, chanWd I e wo i i>,ti !t u%T''""'-^.°' «"^'''^C -.al Canadian A . cre^^^Jtr "' "" ''••'^''- -jMd, that both''p;.:':^:iotl'utin:rf/^ ;j:^n:;::eoft:;;;:^fui£,^-^^^^ C. C. S -^ "" ^^"i'/M'^e^, 7 R, L. eiU, ciifJliJvtrs?" \'>'«^'-f»''" I'utchersof the Muni- iiiliiis ;i- r.~; .;p7r,^;^sr;~;;,,;;.4; 12 8'ec: r "° ^'•■'•«"""'«- «"t iortli, etc y. 38 vto cap I PARLIAMENT. 3fi 1 feld, that tlie unoonstitu- an article ol'a statute does D.«titiitionalityo('tliewli()le constitutional part niiiv be' rv to the sense. Riendeau Huge oj St. Jean Baptiste, on of salaries of pul.Iic ter o( piij^lic order, anct tiire of tlie Province of power to declare seizable >-«'es of the Federal Gov- Uidon & Browne, 22 L. C. 1 Controverted Elections e .Superior Court (if tlie le duty of trying elir.tion I- 60, Q. K. 1878. e Doiniiiion Parliament n t-ontroverted Elections -'and iiiiposiiig upon the Irovinces the right and IS against the election of Of Umiinons o( Canada '11 & Laiifflois, 2 L. N. 511. Ct. 1879. of the Montreal City )-51, sec. 12;^, authoriz- to make a l,y-law im- uiitchers keeping stalls r the sale of meat, fish, the public markets, is Provincial Legi,alaiure ■'i''■ P'''"'«'""^ JMlway, 3 L. 182. i.v40 Vir cap. 41, sec 28, of the Parlia- ment o Canada It is provided that judgment, pi the Court of Qmrn's Bench m matTe s of insolvency should be linal-//,W, tha uc Act was constitunonal. Cus/,in,/ & nnpuy, " Vie e. ir / '" ""' ' '"-'''^'"eMt of Canada, 41 ., Vic, cap. 1(^ known as "The Canada Temper- ance Act 1878," is within the le.-islative arm iu ' nn ''''''• '■'"•^' ^"- Ct. 1870. ... 1H4. lhereg„hu.,jnof the tralKc in intoxi- cating liquors IS within the jurisdiction of the Ru-liament of Cana.la. Corey Exp & The 185. And the License Act of Quebec in so far as ,t pretends to restrain the .sal of ij,.? ' and especially in imposing as a penaltv m ^ E;,Tv' V'"'' '"T' '"'""•"■^ -.coilstuutfo a S. C 1879 "^""■"'""' "^ ^"'^"'' 9 ii' L. 531. DrSd?.nS"'''f",i^^''''"''' Act, in so far as it Sr t';:Jrn;''irin.niSir:^r:: w .11 „.^'' ""'''''' ."^ insurance comp.a, e ACTS OP PARLIAMENT. ,38 ties Fund oftlie Church of Scotland, was ineor- porated by an Act of the Legislature of Canada prior toConledeiation,22 Vic. cap. GG. In 1874 the various Presbyterian churches in Canada were united, and application was ma.le almost sunulianeously to the Legislatures of Ontario and Quebec (br authority to give etlect to this determination, and to enable the new body to deal with and control the property of the ciiurches so united, or in other words with the limds administered by the Tenipnralities Hoard, ivspoiMlents Acts of the Pn.vincial L<..'i.la- tures oi Quebec and Ontario were pas-ed accordingly. All the properly an,| money of the lemporalities Fund was situated or invested in the Province ol Qiiebec-//eW, in ajipeal by hree ludges out of live, that the Act of the Quebec Legislat^ure vesting the property of the Board 11, the United Ciiurcb was «//,« rire.^ and iineonstitiitional.' Dohie & Board for the L K4!'q.'1'}^8?'^"'""^'''^" ^'"'"'' 'tc, 3 II. Intkri'hktation of. 190. The CGth .section of cap. fiO of the Que bee .Statutes 3G Vic, entitled ''Act to con solidale and amend the Act to incorporate the own o( Levis, and the .litferent Acts amending hem, IS directory only, and is intended only to provide a reme.lv lor any injustice that would otherwise be sutfercl by any entry or oniissiou in tie vahiation roll, and is not inteii.led to entail the nullity of the roll in ca^e of -ueh entry or omission. Grand Trunk liadwai, Co. 1879 ^'"'^'"'"^""' "/^«"'«> 10 H. L. G12, "Q. B. 191. General words in a statute do not repeal wlu.l"' P';°.V""". '" "" P"""" "'"■' a">l therefore be taken away only by expres.s words. M,u,or 1880."-^ "'■''"' * •^""**' 3 ^-^^ 277; Qb! IIL Promulgation of. ness throu.rho c'u . ,b f 7 '"«"rance busi- coSij^ ' , ideiai ;;; r:""" ^'''"^'^'^ «^n?tra:;it[r;tL^zi,5^^2-i;: * KeverHlng S vox «t ,.„ . - tBefi,retl'rriV;c';ni;i.!'''^"'''^'^- t ConHrmed iu Privy Council see 6, L. N. 26. 192. A writ of attachment under the Insol- vent Act, 1875, was taken out a>-aiiist the defendant, and delivered to the aTssi..„ee to wlioni It was a.hlresaed on 1st April, before 3 l.':"''/r." T'",''^"" f'"'' "'"'^ the Act was assented to which repealed the Insolvent Vet 1 he writ wasjiot served upon the delendant until between o and (> the same evenin"— y/-7rf that tlij statute having come into lon^e on the' l.st, it,s operation began in the mornin.r it„d f880 i 25 L. C. J-. 91, S. (J. IV. Repeat, of. 193. Where a provision of the Canadian Par- liament prior to Conli?deration was repealed bv an Act of the Quebec Legislature subsequently tliereto, and another substitute.! llieref n to thn same ellect though in ditferent ssoxxU- Held that another Act of the Qiube.: Legislature, by "'""-•'' ""^ former was rei.eaied and tlie wortls Se^GUN^M"™"" "' J"''«'»e"t Of the Privy Conucil. 39 ADillNlSTRATORS. llir; 't I'il Jorn.nce & Clly of Montreal, 2 L. N ISofs! C m. Aotioii uHs l)roii<;l,t „i„ier 8ec i;)3 of t .e JMsnvc.„t A,.,t of 1875 alter repeal oh u Act.un.i u,l,.,n„.rer l,use,i on (l.e m-eal w,' ! 1!'5. TI,o Insolvent Act, 1875, bv sec 140 "!'• '-^Ttum ac.sco„unnt..| l,v a„ insXn or ilie A,i repeaiuijr ,|,e insolvent Act 1H7^ I"';'v„le,l ,l,at ..all ,,n,ce..,lH,j:s under the In' solvent Art I,S75, an.l ll,e aTn.nH « Ams n W ■""'<-' 'il therchv, an( tu liis estate an,, ■i|| lonit.-il or act I N'T m resi,M,.f il, ,,.,.,,.■ ■.i -une n,anner and ^Hl,, i"J:,:,^ t ";•,;: Acl liad nut Inrn tiasse.l "—11,1,1 . ''■."'.His n.e,,t.,ndM.se.u,i,eo,n,iu.,,id;;;c,:::,!:^;:;;; '•';v''i"-i-^^'tHir:j^;:;.::rj^r,n;;ti- ADVANCES. 40 ADJUDICATAIIIE. i. I^'A"i'.nYOF,,veeSALE,Jt:i„c,AL. ADMINISTRATION. 1. Oi.. MiNou's EsTATK, wc ACCOUNT. CUUXTS. """""'■ "" «^''^<^'^««'"^, ^^c AC- A D.M ] XISTPwV T()I^S~^rr CURA TORS, EXECUTOJJS, TUTORS. I. Account of, see ACCOUNT. II. IXVESTMKNT.S BY. 19G. Adn.inis.rators, as denned by section one oMhe Act ;i;j Vic. cap. u,,+ „„, ;„,„,„;: t'c c.M,(orni,ih'e wlicii i,cc>-l r ■ t . ti ^'^'"■"•'^"'K- shall thi.t ivlion. ,.nv lienHlvbrf ?,,"'''' "■'"'''''.''"'K Act,, nid auy "ill, an.l uiiy (ulnr I r oiirn L h' <;X(>outor under fuel, administrator have "eon mJdr.fh.„'^;''"8 '''"^ TV T) ^'^^^ ^ ■ tn.ruie cumlnj,, n„oIurcL>oitJiIaAct. POTHKC " ^ POTUtC FOB, jjge Hy. t I (ee.stobeexen,pt from liability by reason othe.nvest,ne„t«,„adebytbe,n,savinJalwi; tl.e case of fraud in „,aking the sa.no, .nuJt ;;;v-tn,oney«,n.ldbythe.;a..uchinDor- ''H.n or Provincial permanent stock or del«„. nres or ,n public securities of the United Kmgdon,, or of the United States of Americr Zi"'*^"'^''''''''''^''-"^-'''-^-'"-' - .. unicipal valuation roll at double the atnount of the mvestment, except in the case of execu- o wlien they are authorise.) otherwise by the substitution when they are likewise otherwise auhori.ed y the document creating the s.b. tution, and ,n the case oftiuHtees when they athl^^l ?■'""'"'°"==^^^'^^'-'^~" ^rea .ng the trust. When, therelbre, invest- |enu are made otherwise than as above pro- vHied or than as ordered by tiiewiil appointing executors, or by the document creatitfg a sui obS", "'■" ''"*'' "'^ '^'i-'i-'i^trator. ar, j'hged to indemnity the parties to whon. they cmtion of the securities invested in under nain of coercive imprisonment, subject to "ov" ons contained in the Code o,^ Civil Procedure ZZT ""'""°"''' '" ''^•^''°" oneadminis. ;;s;^;s;':hf^;t^i^:f --^^ • . "^' ""- "Ke pain or coercive "nprisonment. 42-43 Vic. cap. 30. ADMIRALTY. mekcSt shippTng.""^" ^^^^^^' "^ Miuimil lIw. "''"' °' ^°''"«'°^. ^« ADMISSIONS-&e EVIDENCE. ADULTERY-^ee MARRIAGE. ADVANCES. ccip!;xY^„r;iL,'::rL(xK^:'^ '^'^^■"^ - ANCES. 40 ■ 'TO"! liability by reason Je by them, saving always making the same, must y them as such in Dom- ermancnt stock or delien- securities of the United ^nited Slates of America, 3 Province Valued in the ill at double the amount ept in the caseofexecu- liorized otherwise by the titutes and curators to a ' are likewise otherwise Jment creating tiie sub- se of trustees wJien they iorized by tlie document I'lien, tlierelbre, iuvest- 'ise than as above pro- li by the will appointing cunient creating a su', •lie administrators are 3 parties to whom they !8 caused by thp depre- invested in under pain t. subject to the provi- ode of Civil Procedure, making investments in in section one adminis- brthe damage caused ■ like pain of coercive 3. cap. 30. British Vessel, see i OF Collision, see e EVIDENCE. MAIUilAGE. ES. .THE SecCRITY of VS. ■viiNcv, see INSOL- i-n'T, see WARE- iiEc FOR, iee B.Y- 41 ADVOCATES. AFFIDAVIT. 42 V. RionT of Agent to Recover Money AuvANCKU Foii Si'Eoi'i.ATioN- OX AUroin. see GAMiJLLVaTRANSACilON. ' ADVP]ETISEMENTS. I. I.v OKFtciAL Gazette, nee GAZKTTE II. SuMMoxs 11V, see PROCEDURE. ADVICE. tV ^n ^f""''^' Cofxcn,, see TTTORSHIP JI. Uk I.KIiAI, Coir.NSKl, X(> IJak TO PllF- 8it.mi.ti()xokMai,i,-k, stfc DAMAGES for AIa- Licious Prosecctio.v. ADVOCATES. AD U'S "^ ^"'"■^'^'"^■^' ««e ATTORNEYS II. Fee.s of. III. I^JWERS of. IV. Remiinehation. II- Pees of. 197. An advocate is entitled to add to liis ac ion the lee usually ..iKU-eable fur a kvve 's 1879 ^^'^''''"'" ^ Jackson, i L. X. 37, CC? 198. Plaintiff having demanded pavnient of h s account from defendant wit Lmt h Ic e poyed the services of an ad vocal, who wrote lum th onln.ary letter a.id added Jgl.'iS tlierelor Ihedelendant then sent to plaintilf*! 2;/ he bare amount of the debt, inl sent notlm^ 't ?!..« calling It a balance ,iue on Ibe account alter deduction of the costs of the lelter-Z/Z that the plaintiff had a right to recover te costs of the letter, bat that ^LOO was a sXie il 199. In un action by an attorney against bis wt" a lory'""""' 'T'r '' ^««'"«'« «'« was allowed over and above the ia-ted bill die t'n^,"ri"*'' V" '"'"^"''"" ^' "■' i«'ion the coZ K "•■'■•"""•'"'>■« «'-'''9.V5 on account ol w >pt ,1 • < "■"' "■^" "'"' ^•"'•'•i'-'l >" anneal vleie ,|„ jndgnwn, was coiilirmed. The a or K',! ' "';"l'P'''l;>"t I'l-ought action to recover lis tt 1 uunt ol labor in cuniH.ciioii with the case and there was evidence that they we e to l^ paid some $50 extra, which, in ll^u, they hS ■"^ "'•^' iiiftdiicc was liiaintaiucd, e,xceptas to the hfty dollars. In review this .lU'lgment was reversed, and the action was dis- misse.1 altogctiier, and in appeal the judgment "' "'\' '';-.«t. M'Stauce wa< restored, cost of appeals divided. Larue & Lornmier, 2 L. N loo, S. C. [{., & 3 L. N. 284, Q. B. 1880. III. Powers of. 202. Though an advocate can bind his client until disavowed by anv proceeding in the cause, be cannot b.nd him without special autluiritv by anv agreement in the nature of a compronnse. A/«,/ & I'insonneault, 22 L. C.J. Oo, if, O. f875. IV'. Remuneratiox of. 20;l Defendant, an attornoy. was sued for the amount of a promissory note and pl..aded com- pensation by prolessional services. Deleiidant m,l been enijaged in a cas. ut the re.iuest of tiie plaintil through the attorney of record. Hie plainiil! having won, the tax^.l costs were l«ii' to the attorney of r, cord bv tlie lo-iiKr party, and delendant got notlim"— /M»/ th'i't he was entitled to be paid by the plaintiff; and tlie plea ol coinpensalion was maintained. 1879 '"'^ rfei»^o«i!(>,i^, 2 L. N. 178, S. C. 204. The defendant was engaged bv the plaintiff to conduct a suit lor liTuragainst his ■-on for an alimentai-y allowance. The action was successful, and the plaintiff obtained judg- ment for an allowance the arrears of which amountnig to UMli, the deli-ndant took a trans- ohin'lft .',■ Ii ''''■''''^''' "''^'""'^ informing the plaint ft 01 the amount. Some time subse- quently he paid the plaintiff $100 out ul ". as a favor, telling him at the same 1,1 A " "'V ""*,' >'"""' '° P^y ''i'" ativ- ilimg. Action l,y phunliff to recover the bal- ance of the arrears, delendant having been paid his taxe.l costs by the losing umv—Held that to stipulate for a share of The proceeds of he suit, as delendant appeared to have done as maintenance, and could not be allowed, and hat not having stipulated Ibr any fixed sum he '1^ endaiit had no right to recover anyibing * Bat aoe contra. Ibid. AFFIDAVIT. iinuitr^EPir"''''"^"""^"^^-- l[. Effect of Pkemmixahy Affidavits. 11. hoii Attacu.mknt, .s-ee ATTACHMENT, r ]■ ' ^•^''''^^' •»<-'« t^APIAS. civile" '^'^'^'"^■"' Civile, see REQCETE VL In Insolvexcv, see INSOLVENCY. Vir. Of Death OF A Person. Vni. With Opfosition, see OPPOSITION. ,J!t ^7"!;? " <|«''^"'iant to an action on a note pleads that the stamps on the note were I; 43 AFFREIGIITMKNT. 11: 1. > «• I., li. 25J, 1 c ira""" "'■ "• ■■■■'■ '!". *£,_;;„:; s" "ir ,» f-iiJi".:.,,, 1,,. l.M. S. C. K. fsTf '• ''''""'/"". 3 Q. I.. K. Wlurc jinij-iiioi.l ■ir,. ,,,.,.' ,i """(^'I'liont tli.'iN>ne,n 1 u ,, '-'"lY"'''^' '■^'^"".-tc.l l,y p.Mp..e a e . no ■ W, '"' '"'^"'^'.""■■^ed ,1,^,1 VMI. OkDkatii oka Pehsox. 208. An affiilavit of ilie (IphiI. ,^c„ ol Lower Cum'iWu .,"''* '"'^O" out AFFEEIGHTMExXT-^,, DEMUR- RAGE. I. Chaktku Pahty, li. Liability for Fbkioht. I. Charteii Pariy. E;\:::S::;:;r ;■■!;, Fi''f-(^ flufj IKit bfllM' lead,' to .eeeivL ' ' "'*^ it« uMi.rations eit ^r HtenI 'nfT "',!""" cu««,.i,ed.os.,appe„a:u^t^nlivi;::i: AFFREIGHTMFNT. 44 q"">'ter. R.. G r/', .'"^'^l"'"«« -ferli'is per «l'i|> 'rtlu.;'pj,, ''',>/''' !'^' arrival of the "'.^'vpreseiitaois "','■■'';;';;''"''• <^!' certain wroM,.-,|„,"? ''•';'.; «"'l own,, to Ho,„e '"n iiiai It wit.s ooiMiieii-iaicil I,., ii 1 " Appella,,,. s„o,l lo t , ■ e t a "I ;"""""'"• ''"./respniHientset „„ is j " ' , ^'^''INivter, '"■en MKleioJ hill ,. l"'ove(i lo |,H7e 'I'e ."liil. and tl,.,. 1 ' '""' """tro of HPi.e)h;f:ri;'', ;;.,;;-J:'"-''-t "^--v .hat Q'ie«ti,,iiwi,etl.ert ,, " ' '"" ""'"'■'•»• not .see thai, tiiere Is >l,„- ^ on t : "Jean- pn^leiieewliSr'Ahh. '^..irr'V'"'''"''^- 1" me liiat 8er..eani Kl,,.,. . , . , ^' " 'fears ^■'ler into the in eade of , '"""'^' ''.'■'*• ^'^ tliHM tooh.erve til M H ""'~e .;u.ses, Cirther interpretation of il,„ , I . '"'" "" t >e i« f'-«eiv 'i ''p,s:er"i;.i"7^'^ ,^''''^ •■"'« I'H''tie, PaVtl Sect 5 M w '"{'' .'''^"" «-'''. ol'l.e ihipor it is he'l ^ ^- '' "^ 'l'Hea.e gation to^earry "o h Tnt P ,r"-'^-"''' "''l''- other parties W, n'l) ,.,'"'' '"^ '"''y'^i'ls lion of our Code, which it i ■ ^ '";^'"'""- 'lie rule of the old I, J ! ""' '"" '?''^"l"«'lv and it appears to me''. "V'".".'"' '""'^ "f la.v, M.I,.ieai^^?o?a.h."^, ;:':'; ,-'7''^'^« ."'",' '■" "'e ifl.e wereow er.'''2408 C C "'v:";''/ ". '*^'''*' "« n. LiAiiii.iTY FOR Freight. vevance to Ghis^mv. T " , .Vf"" ' '»! lor eon- "•••ether tir i:;,ir V :it; '\,r'''Vv''" ai'o.se in 111 d-ocean .in,l ,1 / A .sturm on deck imvinXen In, t'r ''*' '''"^•'' ^^''''e "■ere alniiml l?,b ''""^ked ahout until tliev destinat;-- ''"'' ^''•''i carried to their """""'"" ^'"^ «''-''"«i that the contraci .. »-M|^..^ IGIITMRNT. 44 =nmerin Montreal to R. Q olUim.|,eiice«terlirij; oer" "-. I'T (lie coMHi,!..r«ti,„; of anslerred by eM.lorscMicnt ""■'<''■ l"";'y to reH|j„n(|pnt, '.V "PJx'llH.it.s i„ niauf ot' l«""'f'it pr„ri,i.-e,r to nny It "t the rate ol!)-. '{,1 > »• ■111 the arrival of the ;|«-.-'tinatio.,. 0„ certain " tlie (vipiai,,, ,v|„, the yes-el when firat "■■'' ''n'' owiii,!,' to some 'art, resp„M,l,.„t MitH-n^l , .Kesp„ii,|ent It seems ifrmal frei-ht-that is ;(,/ pniniise,! t„ p,iv „, jj > |«iy the other ;i,l.,sHV- saie,i i,y these (lamn.rel "^■••■V"' •'*■'• P''-c,Muner, Ins «lania;,'es m compen- were proved to have s eunlen.ied that appel- itl iemvnerswh„pla,:ed '"11 who had control of I't'sponderit knew that 'I'Ts and not owners, larterers were owners of iiy 'lie Conn: "Jcan- L' variance in tiie jnris- |ii-^l'"«on. It appears I's note to the 8ili edi- eai's np this snppo-ed ' ""iiteessary ||,.,e to ol these cases, further liere is any part ion lar must turn ,,ii the Iter party. This rule ■r has lui,J ,||j„.„ ((;|| u- 10;i). It is the lease ise of Work— the ol.li- 'nt lothier savs that jnsecjiience in 'French '>teror the nierchunt, to estahli.sli that this ic'al etiect as rejiards lot therelure conseier lilliculty raised in the not, we must always i,r law on the matter, Ian aliscluted,sp,,si. it he not ab^i.linely low onr rule of law, decisive that in the h-lessor IS liable as '■,St(jddurt^ Gusset, HIT. 'r of tlie steamship le ."hipped by delen- I Montreal (or con- I'iN of ladmj; con- t'ljrht would be due I or not. A storm cattle whieh were d about until they pnslied overboard "■as lialile for the ;en carried to their that tJie contract 1^45 AGENCY. AGE^fCy. «as to let certain space and not to deliver the n';-/''r/"'f fir""' "'' ''e^tina-ion.* M„rm,/ v. 1880 ' '"^ V. Head,:i L. N. 47, S'. C. AGE. I. Of DkITTY rnOTIION0TARV PAN-JJOT UK OAM.KD IV QfKSriON IN OkDKK TO I.NVAl.ll.ATK WkitS 81GNKD BV HIM, see WHITS 46 AGENCY. I. Action- bv Agent. It. Action- ix namk op Agent. III. Action- by Puincipai,. IV At Ki.kctions, see ELECTION LAW Commission of. Efidence in actions hi/. yi COMMISSION OP Agent. V 1 r. h actohs. mw are. VHL Liability ok Agknt. IX. LiAUII.ITV ok Coltl'OHATION I OF AuKXT, .lee C01{l>()KATI0N Uei^CoKxY.'" ^™-- XI. LlAllU.lTY OK PkINCIPAL. All. Lien ok Agent. Xlir. Ok Assignee in Insolvency Y ' n'*" Consorts, see CO.VSOIits AV Powers ok Agent, *■«<; INSUR.VNCE AVI. Power ok Attor.vev. XV[I. PIIOOK OK. vrK-'^i.'^'''^''""'^'"""" "■• Authority. Q^i^: ^n^:;^^' ^'"^^^' *^« ACTION XX. What Constitutes. tier, paper and the account rendered were both 11. the name of the princi,«il-y/,7,/, reversing ecsion o the court below, that l-esp,,,.],.,? was not a (actor and had „o riKhttosne in h i.s IIL Action by Principal. 214. Action for the price of coal pnrclia=ed .ydc-l.M,.ian,s,,.om o. In, ,'!''''^''''T' '■""" '''''i'ltill.^ luid knew othin- ot then,; that if T., M. A- Co. were their av-ents as alleged, tiiea^encv had no, bm' d Rclo,.ed, and ,hev were not liabie-//,7,/, ,Jt tor^fii^; hlr;^:"-:-:-;''^ V. Brokers. FOR Acts Company, I. Action by Agent. ' 212. Action n recover the price of books mipphed by a Paris tirm ,hron,ir their „?, f'Z \ , T'r ""T '"'J ""^ controro lie goo.ls, but delivere,!. bills nnd invoices in e name o( the principal. Action in name o(' II. Action in name of Agent. 21:{. Action was brought against annellant for t le ba ance of the prn:.. of d.ooks p^i^-^d, s" by hin. (rom the respnident, actii.. as the W o( one AlielPdon'. book deawVpa" SWe. It was in ..valence that the 8ub,scrip. P^Zhl'""" '" \r; "f tl,e owner of , horn by contn,uU.S'^';::,::iil^^^^ ^^ 2451 C. C. 215. Commi.^sion r/.-Action for Sll.iHB commission .Ine to plaintid (br the half v.'.ar h? see','!;,,'^" .^^■""""-•. l«-'-». tor obtai ,1 ; he security ot his wi(e (br delendant to the -vernment I -r the e.xecntion of a co n , c, , r Ult, wa-//«/y, that the formalities re.inired bv the Quebec Act ;i2 Vic. cap. lo, ,sec 1 1 a ho ti.iot, had no been complied with, ami there- tore the security had not leen valid v jive ad L:x:'2^i:i"iv.--'i. />-/..&■ ^«..,,:j 2I(!. Action on a written contract bv which ppellants a.greed to ^ive to respon,i.„t ' , Ol"::'! r'-'' ""'. »•''-''; "'"1 .sole s'ale of as n. Ol our (arm situated at Lontr,,,. Poi,„e, a, 1 known us the Dillon larni, as^ will cons i e ;^|'"<•» t made on their respective lots, ' '&c ihe respondent. sold no lots, „u on the 2il „i- lois-y/'i ; . 'l"'''"'''l7'iiu.ission on these n re ,\ ,,' 'f '■'^^^P""l>'>'t was sonieihing te''an'rr'"'-''^'''."^ ''<"'''''''' '^"-'-^ n^ir;;!' ;::;■- ;;r:-x:^:r;::;: 217. hcileiicein Action l)i/.— The rest,onde„t purchased , or appellant 500 tie ces W, will.;!, the latter refused to accent- //^/"/ ;, ' l^r ''"!"",?■' r^l^'-'''^" --'Si, Inu thou;:,, appellant admitted givin>' the or Ir tliat parole evidence could no^t bellmltted to walvor of the plea iu bar. Pl»i"tilli auu a 47 AGENCY. |i!«. y.JJ. 187D. ' ^^- •^''"*^ ^^^- ^-o. ;i05, VI. Commission of Agkxt. ^'II. r'ACTORs. VIII. LUBILll Y OF AOENT Unice-I Sole. '?. "1."" P"™*'' '» H" tirts ; a , e,l n.^:; ^7'^"'g,^.""'<^ 'inn. plain- 8onallv re pm si! "l'" .'^''''-^f'-V "m-I kt- - "^'^P""S'""' to.-uch injured purly, even AGRXCY. 48 '""■""■■n"- '■■ "■Z'S.Q iMSik *"""* ""'■"ig to liave their claim se(il,.,l ti • ipsliii P«ny l,eca,ne insolvent, and a" ' ,rVo(' L'X ootid wan mud" TIip ,Iu(v.. i I I ^' """« .-tand of what , 1^, ' ' '' '"^^^■^^e-'. to nnde.- ..;„„] ;■; ,s o™ ;'™ S"' ";r"-v '■"• ■"" 43.&24i:c:K5,'Q^/^:f,S/^^«'.^^^^-v. ■."der,ak,ng inM" S ow ni'ir ""'.t'^" Stewart, Tru«tee-Z/e^ Slowing 1;:;;.^ v." I5XCY. 48 49 '>1 ffiith the orders of his ^,'0:^'^^ ^''"'"^ 'iwwliether a letter, which >e (leleniluiit as Prenident iimis Conipanv, involved A ndinienrret was ubuut 1 PfU'cts of the Conipanv, )osed, and prevente,! tfie the saisie-arret by pre r claim settled. This 11 of a letter to the attor- vaH intended to he si.ri.ed ecretary, but was sifrned Subsequently the Com- . and a return oi' nulla lelendant beinj; s-ued on pleaded that he only Ml his capacity ot pre- Hiatthe pl"ii)titfs should ' - '"{IH^'enient was, unless as a personal engau'e- iniiibns Company w-^re ' lliedebt. The terms . seemed to excluile all stated that the defen- '«ideiit," and he sicrnej icunient also appeared ? It was intendeif to be and secretary, but was ly. 1 he judgment of •\"'A''r ''*' •''^''>^'' '" '1'*^ «>'>t lenient-. tie.'f. tliat the company were bound l,v it !"•' '■ Rl AfiKmn'. "Oil rnrs,u:: m.mI n.,i on n,v,.nril of ( ■ ■•' /^;^'i;-;;:;;7/;rN:'^i;;';;'';. S;;^- ?:;r:,;;::::;i;::.l;;:;;::^,;::t::: ;:;!::::' ; -A^JUKKMKNT. n2 •\\l. I'j;;':;:;''''^'- ;T,i<,;:r;r'''''''''V'Pi.Hia,,;:inu i.''iHyr '•'•■^1 l-nl Miv,. .,,■',' "'", '"'ir '" ""• '"".-,.,.,,( ,„ ,,.r„ „ , ,' ' '"'., "•Ill, „,„i.,„ VjKi. Wll,.,,. u wrill,.,, |,„«,T of Htlnn,,.,- in ' '' '" '"'I',' -" I'I'i l"na,l,. hvuMoll,,.,-. u, cr j;;M;:!;;;;,:i;;:r;;;;;,i';;,r;.;;;.-.c. .""'"' '"' •";V"^"i"''l. "-M ,1,.. ,10.., „,. a.iS On » .•.M,l,.siaii.,„ ofdainm ,„ „ „„,,.„•„,, 2 :;;;n;:i;;:';,,l;;~;;,™i;,,;;-.S»^ .:'""■? ---ft;-:";:;;: >''hI,.|,.,„|„„| T|,, ,, '" "" ""■■'■ll"Ns,. ,,rili(. '^"l"'nurC ,.,,""; '""■^•''"""^^,.,1 in (|„, n«hlaH„,,,,„, ,,V| ''''' ,''''!' '''■"■'"'"lit l,u,l u '''••"HiirMi, ,,..;'''■,''' "<• li"l'H M o/IW o.n,(ra,.(,/|i ■''''''''''•.''''''•''•■''''■'• n,l,.H '"'•' i" A,,,„.a ! f.i "■ l;'"."''l"'l. lint •;;'M'-v.,is,,aJoSi: i!-;7;-;-'»:u« I'l ml ,1 icciiviir /. ,,*■''' "' 'ni' linn- ^^- WirAT CONSTITUTKS. -\ \ II- I'lioDK or. l;;£'..;;;'™,i';,=!;;;«:,;ir™:;,- "..,k vv:,sM.,t ,,,,.,1,0 ,1..|,.„,|„,„ „„,,,„ ^Futo. •!;- an.horuluu-n r a";,„ ',!;;; iiiiilii -»• As to what constitntes sullicient proof Mlllf|(). i„ (|„, 'liirly Im.Nn „| ||,,,„ ,„ ""I'll, i,„.,vliii„| in M,,„. '71"".. N..N,|„ |„^,„ ""II'- 111 I'lMdl,,.,-. |,s7|, '"n'v.liNt, HUH ininrnii.ii " ^"M 111.- lio|H I,, III,. I"'i' pniind, Willi ii|,(i,,n ''■■iij-'iiiii uiiliii, mv..,.k, ' ''li'l""'''- 'I'll-' U|.|M.|. Ili'illlnli iiiiil K..|/.|.,5 (lip II IIh' Hll'I'll.llINC (il'tlic II »iiH iliNiiiisH,.,! in (he '.'I"'' ">' Ifi'vicH on the ' l'i'"l"'i(.v III plainliu; lliiil (Ii'Ii'imIhiiI limi n I' NT1UCTS. Ai.E, Not akobs- 63 ALIMKNTH. ALI.OWANCM. 54 II. Til I'HIMH'IIK TUB VVlTlllHlAWAt, OK A ('lit MINAI, I'iKISrOl'TION Aim Il.l.KliAl,, «te (JON- TUAC'TS. ALDKIfMKM. I. Ql'AI.IFICATIDN OF,.wMlJNI(;irAI,(;0U. POIIATIO.VH. ALIAS WUIT— ^W; IMIOCKDUUK. ALIKNATION. I)(')vVn!','v'''u'.\' M ';■'?"""^• <"itf:i)iTOKS, ,,cc J)(>iN A I lOM, SAM';, TRANSFKIt. TlnM'''^"*".".''''!" ''" ^•■"•■^•A^. *«« I'ONA- Af.IKNS-.sVv FOKKIONKRS. IIKM'KIN TI.KI'KOVIM,, MAV I.K |.„;m»,I1 Hiiriialcd or Hciznl \,y hif. crnlitorN. 'I'lic plnin- 111! (ImI not iiiiHwcr llic (mhiIi'mIuIioh //,/,/, Hint ic rcnl III i|iH'Hlion nmlil not liruiturj,,,! im.lrr (111' liTiiiH o| till. |m(|IH.hI, ivhirli u;;i(.,i| willi C. [■,;■'■'**■' . <;"iil<"liilioii ii,uintiiiiH.,j. inviu A Itdijer \ .y: that he he roulmiiil,: /mr rorixi lo pay the amount ol Ins cosIh, which was Home .'J2(iO I'elenilant annwen-ii the motion for the rule that he wan only liable for a foiirlli of the co.ilH, and depoHited that amount, inclndini' costs o( Keizuren, in court-//.W, that the ifeponit was Hi.lhcient i,ia-n,nch an the delem/anta oould not he held jointly and aeverallv li,r the r;','.-/" "'"'/' '"■'■'^"- Oreoier v. Ormer', 9 11. L. V. KlQHT OK WiFK TO Al.I.MKNTARY Al,I,OW- 248. Demand hy a wife for alimentary allow- anoe, and (or periniNnion to live apart (rom her ^20, & 24 L. C. J. 41, S. C. 1880. ALLOWANCE. I. To DEFi.:snANT under Contuainte p- Cuiu's, see ALIMENTS. * Alimentary allowance granted by a Court. ** Ar- :al, uUk'VS. ^'-''^""'"'"f Childrkn, see All- ALTEKATION. T. Op nii,i,s A.VD NoTKs, see BILLS OP EXCHANGE. ALTERNATIVE OULIQATIOxV- See CONTRACT. AMA liLE COMPOSITEURS-^ ARBITJiATION. AxAIEXDMKNT. I. Costs of, si-f COSTS SkI^X'IH. Pkxai.tv IV VVV^I.''""'''"'"'"'-''^ OF HEARING. VVV "i ' ""^''■^"I'KK IX. vvv f 'ir'""' "*' '^''"'^'■• V VI Vi, ''*■■''"'"■= "'^^TAXCE. VYv .."•'^'''■•■'''•' ^"'V"-t;. VVvi I'i''""' "' \VlUT IN8TANTER. AAAI. ItioilT OP V Vvff; *'.'■'■'•' ™ I'«KVEXT. ;>;>:>''/• '"^K-.-RiTv IX, AAAVL lo Sfi'REME Court. I- After Desistement. ■m ANSWERS-See EVIDENCE. Admis- sions. ANSWER IN LAW-Sce PLEADING PROCEDURE. APPEAL. I. After Desistement n. By N„TARv ,x SriM'ORT OF Deed. i L Death of Party ix. ■Iv. Delays in. V DisroxTixuANOE of. VI. Effect op. solvency""" "'■ ^^'«°"'='>-cy ON, see IN- VlII. Fac'tu.m.'* in. n. By Notary ix Sui-port of Deed HI. Death of Party, ill appeal ,loes not inie.Tuptthe' nro,w7;''™''^'' IV. Delays ix. 252. Motion to reject appeal granted, the 1(1 it VI. EAL. S(i ''«i ee MUNICIPAL CUll. 57 APPEAL 's COUBT. IMK.VTM AT OXCK. o Annul Lktteks fKS. 'KItlS. Mattkrs. AIattkks. V. COIIIT .)!.', C0ST8 OF IXTERLOCU- OK HtAHIXa. 5KS IN. PPKAI,. STANCE. E. T IN.STANTER. ^ENT. 'NCir,. [JoL'UT. voran interlocutory cil rimy deaist Croi,, lor lca\e to appeal iioiit the ootineiit of ucli uii>e the a|i|x'al H «!,'aiiist appellant if^teinent. JV«(/eaw {. KS7G. 3KT OF Deed. ileulared /hux hy a unit the notary lie Mil who was one of • allowed to appeal he debt. Dejoi/ & isf, on the ^'roiinj en hied in tune — J ha.s not appeared le proi;eediii>'s in f' 22y, Q. B. 1879. leal granted, the renwiris not havitijj heen filed until the ilav he- li'i'f, 1 /., N. 27!), Q. n. 1H7H. 2r.;t. KeNiK.ndent moved to have it declared that appellant had Icwt IiIh rijiht of appeal, He.Mirily not hiivii.K heen iriven within the time spec'ifled hy tieor.ler. The court granted the iniition, as there wan a cine.-tion of co'-tM on the opplii:alion for leave to appeal. McCa/freu A JSnnicaii. .'i L. N. 2U8, Q. \i IHHO. -■'I. Motion to diHiiiinH an appeal hecau«e the reason.H ot appeal were not tiled within the eh'ht davspre-cnhed |,y the Co,le. Motion reie.Ued rN(') rim c c"p '*' ^^"'"' ■* '" ^- ^"'''''^- '^• L'.V). .Motion on (he part of defendant in the t irciiit (.oiirt to he allowe.l to (ile liin petition in appeal six moritliH after the pmper time. It appeared that the appellant'- ailornev sent the reconi to another attorney in Qiiehec," inlendin.' ''■-:'""'!:' '"■ ',' ""• ""• "■"n of Seplemheis ^'7. I i('Q'ielh.ccorre.-.p,,i)dent,h(l not know whii to( o with It and kept it in hii possession . oyer ti.e Dewmher tern -//,■/,/, that the laili.iv to produce the apptal was not that of the pu lie otheer, hut of the appellant's attorney an,l tha leave could not, uiid.T the ciruim'- i'Io'q' li vTs *''"""''^ * ^''■"'"'''' ' ' ''^• 2oi; Motion to have appeal declarcv), ahan- doneil, the fjetition not havi„^rh,.en fil,.,| within the twenty-hve .lay- .Secunlv wasdiilv -iveii, and the petitioner itavi his petition to a hailitC, often emph.yed n. the otiice of the Circuit Court to hie, hut who was not an oIKcer of the Circuit (oiirt. lustea.l of lili,,sr the p.tition in tne Circuit Court, the laihlf lurwarded it to the clerk ol Appeal-//rf,/, that the appeal wouM I not be disnii8,sed, but the appellant was con- i (iemiu-.! to pay the costs of the motion. Gin- ■' moiU & Mel/iol, 3 L. N. 19G, Q. B. 1880 AF'PiLVL. VII. Ekfect of Insolvency on. 53 ^(.n. A creditor has a ri«ht to sue and reeover jmlirinent aKaiiist his debtor, notwilh-taiidin.' that the estate ol' the debtor may have iH'cn lilaciMj ill compulsory 'iipiidath.n iiii.ler the Insolvent Act,so hjii;;as the .lebtor has no. b.en disclmiKe,! under the Act; and, coiix utlv. proceeding's m appeal, to which the debtor is'u party, cannot be siisp, „ded on the frr..und that the, lebtor has made an as-i;;,,,,,,.,,, ,|,„|^,, ,|„> "T- T'L.'^'A' J>:'-'"""l""'ll A We.Uotl. 23 Li. t. J. 21»2, Q. B. 1H78. VIII. Factum in. 2fll. A factnn, is not require.! in appeals from lie Circuit Court unless it be speciallv ordered, and the .urt will not make such order with- <>nt some cise shown, an,| particularly on tiie part ol dei,o,|«i,t, the effect of such ,irder beiu.r 67rQ.'B"l'H78:" ''''"""' "" '''"""'"• ' "^^ ^^- X. Fho.m Judoment. V. DiacONTINUANCB OF. , 257. An appellant who has neglected to nro- dnce Ins reasons of appeal within the prescrrbed . delay cannot obtain a discontinuance so as to deprive the resjxmdent of his rifrht to have the n:i?rrB.''i87? ""''• ''^'''-'^^'-. ^ VI. Effect of. 258. Where appeal was taken from a jud-ment maintaining a capias, but security siye""n for costs only-/M/, that tl.i.s did not-snsVnd tl e execution ot the capias and the recours'. again, si 59, Q. B., & 9 R. L. 48, 187() oi^f^be^nth ^''''"'"!''"*^'i"g obtained judgment 0,1 the 30th April, issued a mhie-mret m the hands of the garnishee, returnalile on the ;iOth May. 0„ the 20th May the defendant took an appeal trom the judirment, and on the 23rd security was given. Under these circumstances defendant claimed that he was entitled toZZ lev^e o the .seuure-//e?,Z. that the appeal ha the effect of rtxing all the proceeilin^.^s in the position they then were, and that consequently mam levgecouUl not be grantcl. DelmJiZ V. Ommet 4 Perraull, 2 L. N. 194, S. C. 1879 2112. On , InierlocHUn-i,.— A,; a()peal may be graiitiHl trom an interlociiK.ry judgment dis- missing an ex.;eption to the toVm. Hoard of lemporaiihex, .tv;., y. Ml„i,t,r & f. of tit. Awrews Church, 3 L. N, ;i7.), Q. H. i,s80. i.M Action was broughtagainsf the president and directors ol the Levis ami Keimebec U U or damages tor illegal neizure of debeiiture.s' BeaiidHte.one of the detendants, sue,l Keid, the London tmancial agent ol the road, for bavins i-sued certain of these ilebentures in violation ol the company's charter. H pleaded to the action eiii/arantie among other things that the ' irectors authorized the issue, and that Beaii- ilette as one of a linn actually accepte.l a portion ol the debentuies as collateral .-eeurity ilieplaintilt e« (/«ra«^/e demurred to the last partol the plea, and the demurrer was main- tamed. On motion leave was granted to deten- dante«//rtmH//eto afipeal. Sonmiiil v Jilan- Qlil^/s.*^ ^««"'^«"« & Wl L. N. 114, . 2f!5. Where a garnishee made his declaration n the district where he resided, which was not the district where the writ issued, and the Pro- honotary having neglected to fbrward it in •nie, the garnishee wa.s con.lemned to pay the debt personally, unless he made a new declara- tion, and paid all the costs of the tierce sahie on inotion eave to appeal was grante.i. Gleason ik Vaneourtland,l L. N. 115, Q. B 1878 . 206. Orderiwj Partai/e.-Ait appeal from a judgment ordering a partage must be brought within u year, and the Court of Appeal will Tiot take cognizance of the judgment, but only of proceedings subsequent thereto, and made in pursuance of it. Jfagyerty & Morris, 8 H. L. '»4i'5 y. 15. i87(). 2(^,7 ^eitliny facts for jury /Wa^.-Motion for leave to appeal from an interlocutory jud-ment ot the Superior Court, settling the facts for a 60 APPEAL. Ji ""•""'"Mir tl„. im.ii,,,, '","^' ''^""' I'- //'A/. y'""-t to Imvp ,|,e ,X ;;,."• «,;i;.'rior mo. ' ^"- * ^'V"''. 3 L. N. 108, qjI APPEAL. Xf- KhoM IlECORnKR-H COCIT. ^^''\^rizz'::l '■'■""' »i"''«'"''"t of ,iu. N. 484, 8. C. IhtX "^ ' •'' "'' '"^"'"'W/. 1 L X". F„o«T«roJn.aMKNT8ATONTK. anotlicr (id,., f ' t ""' ("'"'"'••'y I'V took oni „„(. »ritoCiiV,n„ • , ','"' "I'l'fUHtK Motion ,/is,„i I ;,'" "'J-'^t tlu. „,,,,„a| Xlir. Grocnds of, see R.oi.t op. li^' i>sp,| UH a„ arym,,'. ,"' '""■"; *-''•"""'' oC or wi.id. I.a,i not I'o rSe I ,;^^^^^^^^^^ "," >"-'"""''^ Hei/nemnn & Smith 2 1 p i ^.,"''" '"^'ftnce 2V2. Motion tv'hLl: l\ ^- ^•'"',^-^^- '«". co.nnienced l.v a .v „v V ' L' ')Pf"'"'v. ^""o" n-et the "ffi.lavitl.i^eont;? ";'";• ^"''■'"'"'•t Ih" Co,ie, (or attack mTM «/""*' ""'"'"'I'-l I'y leave to appeal Sef o tt' ^ ''^ f 'f '"» "^^ party tnovin- |,u,| „ nol J ^T"'""' """ "'« P'-ocee.ling tlTayexceti P.''** "!"""* '''"J" of tl.at therefore unn^r"; " "'" '"''■"' "'"' L. N. 202, q!^B. iH?.';'"^"'' ^'^*''' & I'ucaucI, 2 «'.re two nJSe ' ef.i ?^"'.'" ""*' ^''"''^ pmy,an,la,Mked8.H„H 1^ "'l' "" ""' P>-o- till this trouble wa7,v,?" T "'%P>'oc,-e,i;„..M the court dis,nise,T't^^e' ex'fntf"'^ ^"''"'' ""<' costs, wliicli nlttintflf ""• ''^•-■ept UH to delendant Km ant^n '^'"r'^"""''' 'o pnv < , F"l- Appea re" -^ r' '*"■ '""'*■ '"'ap- '•ave not l,ee enS , l"in h' "'^"""=r "'"''='> case was l.elore tin tC.t \' ''''%''''*•" "'^' ti.oWt,iaLcoSif:-l-,-!^r.. 60 '•"i'-e tlial ,„M.H , ; '''•*""■'' ""•:■ ''omM not li. 1). lHf9.' ^"""'""'' V. r„„/„,,,, 2 L.N. MO. >>'' V. In- Actioss to Ankh, Lktt.r« P.tknt. p. "tn;;;ir;t "-r:;'"" t ^'•'"'•' ""■ at- --• in tl,e nan'e'' ;■'';''''•;';; ''''";.'-'-" toannniiciters „„i,„ V Allornev.(!,.n..ral AltornevOencral ■.>><■■ !V ''''■■ Mu)csIv'h An. lO.iyan . ,' '^;''"'' or-deneral, Ac. )iy ''"•'vntotappea ';" ', y''''''r^ the reiMleri.,!. of, I ,,),;,, 1 n' ■' ''''•" '■■■'"" ("■"I i-m.,i alter Irtv I V ^ '"' "■•" "''ap- 'hal ..l,ie,.ti, t vv "• ■'.'■ ,'"" '" »"'^»'" to '","' 'hat tl,e lin,it of (brt ,|„7 onlmary snit, when the Drocecli,,., I ■' , ■ ""'>' applied .wvVe /;..V .-/) 7, :;;f ;;' ''-^ ...(onnatio!/ a.,,1 such cases was t briv ""'/''■ay (or appeal in '"'■'■' 'heap eal as '. " t'T '^''"J' "'"'' ""■■•'^■ -"^V. Iv Ef.EciiON Casks. »' Murra.v I^.vli trie os! '"'''''"'■-"'"' "«''-'« ■•es|K.n,ieni. KeK.",' ' ,' ' '^"f '"'"^v, against "h.iections that I 'el''''""'*"' ''•>' P^'li-'i-iarv posit lm,l never he e ser L ^''^'1 ""'' ''''■ w»s«ive,..nMiintannT(le,iir '■''''■ '':':'*■'''''■''' an"l?ai'^:,,^7,?;:X«",''' Judgment re«derod '„„„„ -c"l';'l7ii';;,;:^|P':™,;Co^^^ Act of 1879 Siiproinp (N.uVt trum til. ., I ' '*'''*»' "''a" He to thB of any court or X,' '«'"''"' '''''''■ "f'T "r d ci, „^ t«-onm,„,«,rrt'e\?;; ;;,;«' ■;,"an^« ;-<■ winch A\mZI° lay the trial ot,|,pn..'iHn.?' ■;' Pfoc-'cdines, or to (1« the appeal Eas been allo«^/^||;}'d"J,y^^«^Pt ea^es when '■mf 'PEAL. fiO i?ti.".ltl,.- nnfP-^/^,/,/, ,i,„t plfiiWccI tl.rv ,.„|,|,| „„, »ri|»''il. Cn,;,..,;,/,;.,, „/■ "' V. ''"K/M/f, 2L.N.;i56, J Anm'i, Lkttkrk Patrnt. """Ifrit to reject the an- ."'''■" ""' ii-H I with!,, .)i'.l-„„.„l.« The ,irti„„ the All(i,'ii,.v-(J,.„|.|n| "V Art. lo;ir, ,,|' III,, " provi,|,.,| 111,,, ,|,.,„n,„|, "lent imiv he „i,i,|,. |,y "'"',' "I" ''>■ "rii-f fiiciiis, "ll-'!i' I'V II,.r M.'ij.stv'.s ||icit<.r-(i,.,ier„l, &,.. |{y '■^ .fn.i,, th,. (i„a| jii,!,,-: ■h iiif..ii,i,iii,„|, proVi.h^l ' withr,, |i,riy ilavH (h.ni >,'ine,i| Theurit of up. ".»■". hilt III answer to !Ptl thiit the proccyJinj^, hut h_v onhimry unit" rty WavH oiilv nppheil iwi li.v inlbrniatioii ami the delay for appeal in S whftlier h_v iiiloniia- iii»''.v (onii, and, there- «> hue. Auiier, A/tu.- lOS.Q.B. 1880. ^ K.S. '','> '^"^' •"' e'pction I n'thuni)tarv'.H ortjce 'f ■'>a;,'iien:.y," against leade.l hy preli„iina,-v " (X'titiun, miticc of of the receipt and de- ii/KinhiMi. Jncl^rnient >reh|„u,aryohjections i«ithfo.>-t^ IVtition- tfiehiipreiMP Court, Hi'o 4H-//e/,l, n,at P(jealahi,., a,„j ^^^^^ II will lie onlv (Vorn hiiHtne,! thenu'iita 'a S Langevin, 2 S. the preliminary ob- as ordinary suits, 1038 ilirnent renrterort upo„ 'ng of tlio judgment, eiidment Act of ]87q 'P71 "liall ]|p ,0 the "!'''.. '"-'ler.ird.ci.ion eliniinary ..tj„c,|on 10 »f wliich ►linl) iiayg cl> ."liall liave „u, an .ifallmml,lia,[.i;,.en Jn(.ndt,)tliP,,e,|,io„ n tliij laat-n.piitioiiert rocccdiiiRH. or to de- ilie court or a judge ••>>ap|K.Hl trum an order Kiveii in ehaiiilHTN l,y a.jiid-e ol i|„. .Si,p,.|j„r C,,„rt perinittin^iaeandidal.al .. federal electio.i t„ cxiumn,. the liallotH. M„rke,aie ii While, 7 l{. . 2,M|). 'ri„.r,. H no appeal to the Qiieen'H Hencli HI o.ntnmrfed ek.clion niHeM. '' •w,m,i v. Maxme, t L. N. ;i8, A 2.1 I.. C.J. tiO, y. U. 1878. XVI. In Fou.\iA I'Ai'i'tiRi.s, ^Hl. The Court of Queen-H Bench .nav ,'rant leave to iipp,.,,! to tliut court /;. /nnwi pmnterU. Liii/WMii ii Churbonneau, 3 L. N, ;(08 tj il 62 XVir. In In.soi,vk.nt Mattki(8. Oene a cot.ld not be preoh.ded fro,,, an appeal. It I the aiiswer to tl,,.. wa.s that it ua- not the Attorneytien.Tal at all-,t wa. anothe „. ty "M;M«h,.n,,ii,e. Kvenifitvveieeons, ;.ra Atloiney-t ,.„eral. an he was named , " chapter taking away the appeal, it woi, d e .l|.-...Miahle uhelherheiH.V^p,:,,^,,:.''., « 2S7. There in no appeal to the Cir(M,it Court o,,,a,lee.s,o„ofthe County Coiineil Hittit.K V reviMion o( an a^He..ment roll. ,»/,„„/,,. 7 v!''n^7" "•> ^'" ''"' "fi''>'>»>'^ Q. I' H. 3.15; ;. vmt Court under ..Vi,.|,7(. o ,1,,. .M„n„„,.;j 2H2. No appeal can be instituted fro,,, a juih'- inent ,vnde,-ed in a case under the Inno'lvent •rt'i, l^iu, alter the e.vpiiaiion ol eijjht d,,v.-< li-om llie lendenntr ot; the .judgment ,;omp|a„.;.d I'H.i. Tlie i,.,„, of ei^ht (liiyH within which, >"H er ,-ec. 128 of the Insurance Act, 1875, m'- cer,imjr, in appeal or revi.Mioii i„i,Kt he in-ose- eiiied, applie,- to jiidj^mcnis m Kcview a' well as to tliosr of the court ot liist inslaMce. y H. US7'7 *^"'' ■ ■'^' ^ ^^ ^- ^- •'• "•' -■■^1. An apjwal lies from all orders or jiiih'- mdils coneernin.. in.so.venl hankn, hut where Hindi order or jud-ment ,.« inierlociiiorv leave must lir.st^ hi. ol.iained. Mwhonhs Honk A St 1871); CM Vic. cap. 31. ' ^ ^«o Appeal doe.s not lie (rom any judfrment of lhe_ .Superior Court, under the Insolvent A.:t ol 1«'.', which IS not a /inal judgment. Mavkw, t i j.'Vo, t''r'i87.;?"'""'" ^"''"^ "'"•• '"' XVIII. I.N Municipal Mattkrs. 286. Motion to reject an appeal which had been taken Iron, the decision ol u u.dge at .Mon- treal, on a pit,ceediiig to have a't.y-law of the Corporation relatinj; to hiitcliers' ,.,alls dc- 1 t ;'.7 -.i^ '.' P''"ff;'"'" -"^"'k"-' under All 9.), ot the Co,!e ol Cvil I'lucedure, winch autlionze.s the Attorney-Cieneral, when any curpoiation exceeds it. powers, , , p,osecute thi c I porat.on on the part of li.e Crovvn. Article 10.i.isays l.at an appeal Iron, any linal jud.- nienl. rendered under the pioMsions o the chapter, lie.s to the QueeirH liench, " except 1 olliLes —lldd, that the article was clear ami could adn.it of 1,0 doubt, e.xcept this- u )"! been contended that as the Statute prior to i e Co,le contained the words "cay an, all nuii t c.pal corporations,-' and th,. wonl city had ■ , o.nit.ed II, the Code, the appeal wa.s^ ot ul e a«ay >or .natters relating to a city corpora 10 The court was unanimous m ^av-,„„ I'^iat th m arKinnent could not prev.d. inodier a 'u- ment wa.s that it was the Attoruev-Generul who was a,skiug leave to appeal, and the Attorney- ''itlq/)id^'i. A|.peal lies to the Queen's Hench from '^|Mdgn.ent..ftheCi.cuil(\Mirt,,,napr.'e.eZ uiner Art 11)0 of the Municipal C.hV- M it-elf', ^^'^■" " '\'"'"i^'l'"l <-'"""'<=il takes „pon It-ell to revise the electoral lists, without anv complaint havitig been pro,liice,i th er. ,s .^ '>I'P<'"I Inm. surh ,lecisi,!„ ,0 a ji ,l«e ,n .I.,.,,? 2J1. But when the Cmncil has deci,le,l'Mrxin a complaint, even when such complaint la C ■ee.. pro, luceil within the ,lelay ',ixe,l I, i:w that ts Hulhcient to give juris.lictioi, ,0 a-ju.ll on appeal Iron, such deciHion. [b ^ ^ i->- In an action to set asi,|e a miini,.i.»il iisHeHsment roll. ui..,„„i ...;ii i... ... ;oMni(,i|ai C i-. C.J.lo;t,2l;).y.B. i87t). XIX. I.NTEHVENTIO.V I.N. -;.)- In an action to set asi,|e a miini,.i.»il ^!'.'!. An intervention will lie in ,natlers in Hl.peal where siuHcient cans., is .|„ wn ,A y ir'isS."' "■ ''' •''-'"" ^ ">''^' ^ ^'^^ 315 XX. JUHISDICTION OF CofBT OP. 201. The Court ofAppeal has no juri-.liction ;' '■""■nam an applicaii'on lor change „ v n" Ml. u.r,m,nal matter. a>r>olne.p.,2L.N'^ XXI. O.v Demurrer. 295. Motion for leave to appeal from a in,],., ".ent disn,iss,i,g a plea on ,l,.,,,n,". . J' 'fj action was for ,la.:,ages tor lihel . , nst t e proprie or of the On.adi,n. Tl„. pl^ .;,,,' 1 >e lorlh that appellant lia,l not 'wr , . , hi article, but tliiU it was written hv a tiot ler on Whom plaintiir ha.t since aven> I nsell" Aiipeal recused on the grouml that thn ,^l, nient could be correctetl oti 'tiie mi.'.'il^J^.'f- .'oun.y ot l)rum,„V,,,-'dTc"rporali,mT!'h'''','; "'',*''« we allowed theaiVil but weTnf.h.; ".'''■ [" ',"»' ""'^ court below on ac'cLut oTirreguia.iti'u "'"" ''*"'' »" "« 63 APPEAL. ^fn:;^;:,'':El:^''''^'"'-5.'-\i-n.,epnvo.i it Ssi;:;,.:: Zf°;;,'';v;'"^ ----'y i" appeal, gncM, iniu i'^'^^: 'i;;;; v-^-'o-'cHkuii,,.,,, """ "'^' """i"M «■ mil I : li "7" J"V''-^^^''''' kin., 2 L. N.^4io, Q:'a /^fs;:^' ^''^'^"'"^ 't ^'«'- APPEAL. 64 XXIII. Pknaltv in. J""t arte, a W, «'^-^;*J Y-i"" "'« "PP"'- XXIV. Postponement op He.uu.vg. g'-i'iic.i (Ml ll,e un,ie,^.,.u I / "!^ attornevs, XXVIII. Reprise d'Instance, '''"' ''HMan lat ' f '"'"'.^'■"^'y oC llu. lo^p,,,, ?W,««„;^3'l!:(^!'l'^J'^^J,,,^Ar^«"-& XXIX. Reqi-Ate Civile. * ^I'o'npson, 2 L. N. 20(i, Q jV. i^yy, ^^''"'P'on XXX. Return of Wr.t Lvstanter. ^-"■aMt..,l. jC V Z xt/""'' ?' "W""*'- M"fH.n XXXI. RlOIITOF. XXV. PRmLEOED CA.SES IN. actio,, i,u,i i;erd5i;.?/''''«r''''' ""*' "'^ XXV'I. I'nocEDimE in, to tl,e .oiTt 1 e o M 1- ''' '"' /•■•'"'-""•»-•. '^i7'(^Y^««:^;:ij!'t;i;rg:'H'i8^"-^"'^ XXVII. Reasons of Appeal. H118S1111; an excentin. ».. .7 " .I'xigiiient dip. wuitn tiie judgiiient oC ' . •■*(";. All interlocutors iii,I(r,np„* ,.,.; .• I'lscripliuii (br eiKiiierN •' 'f""^"'. '<',H'ctni^r an a .i'.'Ig.iieiit (imh ''':;"■' "'"' "r^^'''«> IS 'v<2'.,i:',.rz,^'':i;(:-,^--?i'-'iii.e,it ""' Court or Wah " ? "'"'^" °'' ^•^•^t>. dentin U,eeo.^'^(;^i;i-f- the re.po„ ^'-28 Vic. Our. (•> , ^^P'^'priatiuii under certain SdwLlVid'bi ''-^ -luation o! P<''i'ion.s to tlie Ce nor r f P-'OP-'-^'cJ. 0,i "•ibutorie.M and 1 1 C rnn "''' ''^ '^*'''"*"' ««•'• ■espnndents were re. C """,■' "PP^"""'-' tiie tl'e f:r..„ncl that tliev 17^- ^T'- °"^'=''' o" a'iopted a pr iicinle \v M '" ""■"■ ^"'"atioi, enuneoim tluu h^aln , , ' "'''' '? P'''l'a'«ly OlMiligeiice, vvl ,cl, hi^fied.'r "''''"' '" ■* «-"' |"fe' IlK^ir removal Th 1 .jL"' """■■' '" °'J«'^ I'y tl'e Queen's Benpl.^^o"",^'"' '•eversed Council tha an aili ^PP*'?'-^'*^, in Privy Court to the c:,PrQj:/„ ''•"''' the Superioi^ al'ove order of reinm.«l 1 • ^"1"='' '*■"'" tl'e f^iiit, wa.s to all into,.,! , *" "rJi'iary i"''g'nent of | <■ s^^i'^'' P"7««^^«' ""a^ '"eaningof the lll5tK 9^7'^^*^'""" the ccliiie. J/,,J;,: ,'.•,/'• ''' ''''■ Code 0/ Pro. .)"^Sie^f :;:; £' r,.j^,"T'v, - -^-'« which JMd,r„,eni |„id t I '" ""^ '^'»'"' 'or traiLsienvd^ rior iw ' ''''I"'"''"" '"^' l«^<'" "•'-icegiven!; etmn re^^v'^^^^^ f.'"' "^ 21 i. C. J. 75, Q. r! 1870 '^'""''■5' "■ ^^<"^l<»t. PaSl/iLined VTcS'o ? r*^^"'^"' 'e appellant onlv c.nn lainsr ,? "'"'^ "^ finned. BeuucheL i,"'l'"',"'? o( the part con- ^ t- * Anj may kci VOOtltl.l peand Certidcf ditor nil appcaic seek roil 761 C. c t If III to be (li^ of tllK II to huvoi roqulri'il Judgini'i lutuiiliui served m tllO jlKl;; wifli ilif C. 0. V. Ni) iici three Jiid eliall uii shall |i|> ( from thi review, i flrst losti 'PEAL. finm-d was (Imt the rensons e^cep.,„„,o,i,e,-^,„;\,;;- !7& Giromnl.O K. L. I77, d'Instaxce. "nder (|,e Insolvent Act I'e as.s,jr„ee -of the |,u',,r IVILE. ' ••pqiiete civile may be ^niT LVSTAN.TER. "•isoned on capias, move,! ;l»rit o( appeal, m,,^,-^ «'"""'^ ^««/.- k Paine, 2 Jiiilgi.ient rejVciiii.r an ; "N.l nierits as u^,.„,„ I'lfiori.s und answei'H, 1" »■ yi. Q. B. 1874. la.s bei-ii a (le.Mi.ste.iietit I '""t a tender of cost>, II condeinti the respon- .""e M. huvina hee.i ap- I'l expropriation under we their valuation of t«'en expropriated. On Cuurl, by certani con- 51'atioi,, appellants, the vcd Iroin ofhoe, on ai m tiieir valuation loli Wius 80 palpal.ly "an.ountetl to a wi..,t I'd the court in order- deci.sion was reveised ppeal— //eW.inPrivv ay Croin the Superior ?en s Bench from the which, liaving l,een «'ial in an ordinary "d purposes a tinal r tourt within the •of the Code of Pro- "(real&Jirownefal., e from on exparte tl'at the claim for rendered had been ' "■ought, and no atanlei/ v. Ilonlim, 'from a judgment Court of Review if IIS of the part con- fix. 10 E. L. Illy t^t APPEAL. T-J}} T'"" "'""""' ,'lemandcl determines i1,p rght 01 appeal and not the amount of the m. Ihere i.s no rij;iit of appeal from a jtid-.- ment on procee.lm^s conceininj; mnniuinal QT'mP"" ^ '^"'''^'"'' ^ "^^ ^- ^ ^^' 3l;i. Appeal lies to the Court of Queen's patiii),' a ren.,:t ol distribution. S/wr(is * to the ..r'^Tf ? "?"."''':'',1'.^' '^'PO-^ition aceorded to the creditor by Art. "iJl of the Code of Proce- dure» does not lake awiiy the right of appeil. il Droceed , '" * i''*'^'"''^ "' '^'^""^••i"'^" of the ^v f 1 1 i '*; '■'■"' ''■"'"'« o'' an iMsolvent, sold nu tees and li^biirsements, and the lenort wi- homo ogated-/A.W, that 'the appellaniH who were hypolhecary creditors, had a vUt o amie d v/'- /• V- ^ <-«.iilested in the court below .ilO An appeal will he allowed, in thediscre- .0 io'i^ todi""!' "■"'"• ■•' J"''«""'"' '-^ - ga "17 V""'"""''i^ 1 L. N. 448. Q. B."l878 ^ «',t in the nature of a tierce oppos io , o^' " I'l'^ning of this jndgmeiit, and', no te 'j u 1' ;::"n^M;!J''''^'''7''^«'''l''-'-i""u.ireCj re tMiig ,he i.roueedings m insolveiicv The e ay , r ap|.eal,ng from the judg,^^ t was a owed to elap..e,and subseqiienth^ appellant hied a flat in theolKce toobtain a writ ot-am eal Ihe respon.ieni at once took a ru e ' non aj.pellant to show cause whv a writ slou d .ssue alter the delav had elapsed Til the n le vasgrante.! nhi-Udd, that such a p oceei ,! ought not to be adopted, unle.ss a verrdear hat ^^''T '''''"■" ''''^^''"'W-'lJav, and t Mat ttie party was try u" to wt tl,-. ;.! . 1 -niply ,0 ,ru.slrate lhee'n,lso'ju,?t e it^Th iSMie of the writ, an.l even punish the tiarfv ( r ~j!77.£ri^7.^'^^""'-^"^-K^ XXXIII. Secuiutv in. 3l!2 cap. 12, apply. ing to ju.lgnients ren,i?re,l under A ri 82^' Vl?' " t^eof_P,.ee,n.re,aswdrr^'ot ;•£ lueiits rendered m review M^i ,^ ^■' »"■ tionnl Bank v. I'cnue 5 6 ^ i--! ..^T 1879. '"<«t, o ij. L. 1{. 3(2, Q.B. ^9^ In an action of damages for specific vocation, if tliere .iVrRr ".nds "'r . v^h """'".' '" "'■ peand in tlie suit ,„• his , ,L h ' "Ik'Hht lie Iuih nii- certillcateolliy,m,,,'J''l,,h;^''",''''''>« niei.ti.,nu,l in tie aw ac- 5i;2 A bond in appeal by an attorney at h valid notwithstanding theOth itule^of Pi'ac- tice, and assuming that rule to be applicable ,„ 323. Motion to have an appeal dismissed be cau.se there was only one Miretv n 1 J no. .iust,fied~/A.A/, .LuvVe " U^',," 'o 'ry 'one HUiety he must justify on real estate T"w I'ail lond was„ttered and received, a,„7ella,t 324. Petition on the part of respondent thaf the security furnished fy appellanVbe re LS and the appeal dismissed, the surety bo d Bliall o.isuoli iiiscin.tm,, haL„ " »"per"ir Court, anil eliall K.ontl„...l"to '0^.^;:^' H^Z'^.^Tt'" J'"K"'e»t. from the JuiixiiK^a of 1 .» s';,;,;?5'' "fW''^"'" lleiicli review, if suclf juilcmeiit c onHrT?."''.^""" "'""'g i" -.stileiMn support of the petit -^/^S't^t the bond was apparently executed w, thai the lor,i,al,.ie.s of an autliVntic dcJument J iMallette & could not be , set aside on atfidavit ai.peal to t'he"t""r"firV'"^' "'"■'''"*''' '^"^^ ^ ti".eaCi,yofJIoi,,realdemu7wasd LZ1 as security for the costs of appeaT-y/e / '1 he .attaclinu.nt of such bond in exec,, t, of the judgment would not prevent the cor from 61 APPEAL. stamped, cannot be set aside on the cronnd tha t was execute, ,y error and surprise V„;* 'r: ^"'H'Pellant will not be onlored to Wve new security because ou,. of his sureties ad,? il ad declares that he was really insolvent a e d In-ill""""' '" ^"'•'^' '*'"'""«1' 1'^ tien 328 The Court of Queen's Bench cannot . " ,"" '\,P^''"o" "^ '"'ve the security de dared uisuthcieut, on the ground that he respondent has discovered sin^ the comltS: oltheV.ond that the securities were reallTin suHiceut at the time the bond was lined f^'Me & Faulkner, 22 L. C. J. 53, Q B. 329. A judge of the Court of Queen's Bench has power ,n cliambers to extend the delay ,b givmg security on ap,«.al to the Priw Coundl kv"".l the delay oniered by thecourt w en ever he ,s seized of the matter prior to tl e exp„^,,onofsuchdehM-,a,idonseiunvbeh! Piuinwilhin such exlendinl delay thel-e^nor;! dents are es,oj,ped from executing the udf-,ne t appeale,! irom ne Mayor, dVC, ofMontZl & n,,bcrt etal.,2i L. C. J. 85, Q.'b.VsT? .£o,;:;^i:.;^:^;----'^.;';M;p..un i^;^:^Q:'rK.£:t^'fe^^^^"^^"^ cofo;i?'-;,r=:TS;u£-'SS;: 332. !■ or security m appeal, asinWe hvmthp. cary surely is sulticiei.t. Uk ^ lOpothe- 333. Ajipeal from the Circuit Court. Notice was given that .security wuuld be m t it, on >! certain day, an.) the .4poi,den a,? ea e d and miuired the sureties to gustily. \L smehe JUS ni US required and nj objection wa. otieied xNow a motion was nia.Je, .supiiorted bv nmnlier ol alHdavits, alleging that lU^I e , „ V these sureties justilie,! the partv respond" it thouj,d,t t hey were both liohki^^s of rJal' es a,e an, that he ha.l smce ,Jiscovere,l that theT are' v.M, I -^l ,'•'■"' f'"'e; that they are insol- vent, ii,„| he desire-i to tbrce the appella t n give n,.w .secnrity-//./,/, that the reSem new 1,1,. t. He ,lid not say that thev hail liecome niislakei . U s„ch an apphcalion were allowed t would lea,l to e,i,lless||,i.Ht„,n. Tl co ,rt u'sj' '';":;;""'•'''■'• '^" «'"^-"'« -^ to -h^C i ;, '', "■'^^"' "'"e- iMotion reiected Ifaulkner & Lapohite, Q. B 1877 "^^'^'^'ea 334. UiMler Jii,solvent Act, 1875,' a respondent nap,,,,, was held not liable to 'give iec".r ty lor K.is on becoming insolvent. McKinnon v ^/^'p'^OH, 23 J. C. J. i)5, Q. B. 1878 CinMn, f"'"'.'"'''-^ ^r"'' "' appal from the C.cut Court may be amen,lJ,r bv supply ' the ,lescripiion of the real estate on whiod. » ecnmyjustilied a,„l which ha,l been o itt ,1 >ntli'' t,oi.,l. MoHlreal Cotton Co. & Corp,,.; . APPEAL. 68 Proc^iurc-heaia^Jr^bJIi^lLiS.^^,:;! icLalanne, 24 L. C. .J. IGO, Q. B. 187U. the otK, I' r'fi'"'"-' "1 ■■'^'l^'''*' ■^'""'1'' I'e 'ile,l in Nie othce of the prothonotary of the Suoerior s t t /.ri-'i '"" f 't Pl'*"'^ where the com- 187-J ''^'^'^^'''''i"-^^""^''. lOK. L. 536,Q.B. 338. A„,i a security bond for $500, when the ;'«"','*'" "P,''^'"'"' "•.'^"' '■-''"'■e'l-^ mi in capita 1 eies u,h| ,,ost8, ,„ insulHcient, an,l will be -,.c.«i on^iotiou even alter the'produSni ritfiiiMe,'l',?".^^ respon.lent to have the seen- speoiuc ilelay. Appellant n,)t beiiic able to Si^'n'S ?■?'•'•■ VT'--PP-"-iovr a ct I la 11 pniperiy, which was mort<'a.'ed to tb,. respo,„ient In- $10,000, a,„i which ^v" s" le very P'opert^. ,„ dispute, by a ,lee,l in wnich it w2 tipu ated that they wouM neither .sell nor n.ort gage the property, an,i that they w,jul,l retur t purchaser nor the vendor ha, tl,; n. it e to them ^ew .security orde.-e,I.A>o/>«-/&7%eK •^*U. Appeal dis„,isse,l, new security not hav- >« been p„t ,„ within the dela/ o,-dered M>r>n&jro,nier, :^ L. N. .■»2, Q. I5.-1880."^- ■5-ti. Actio,, against the auoellaiit iippel accom- P'He,i by cap;as. In the oouit'belowipl^irant a.l given security on tiie capias by tra s^?rhu to the plaii,t,H/w/te„ dcM clain s to f I '.r-r '^/■,,!V'','S'''"" -"ount sued for% «;./',■■„ ""* ' elen,lant, now appealing, prayed arte ot the ,leclai-ation that he ,a,l pTevSv given security to an amount three ' n es tS amount sue,l Ibr, and he renewe.! the Xr of this security to avail as security Ibr judgment '"I costs ou the appeal. Secunly ac e t^e on cond, lon ofpi-ovingthe value of the by pml ecT o« "\"»T'' ^"IHcient for the p, ,CTt ■*-; *'' '"■I'c a motion was mmle to,lis„,iss an appeal on ll,eg,-oun.l of insu.Iieient secui' y the appellant was allowcl Mfteen days m w [jj ,o .ncreaset,,e..,.,,. .aey & n?ap:i,:!;'u^\^. aner the expiry ofthetilceen.i.ys^^/^C^ buch case the party must show not only that 336. Where the security, on an appeal ft'oiu co«.« i„ t.,^ event o^^i^^^'f:^'":^^^,^:^' "•" judgment w,h ,-en(^,'-t i ^,^ ™,.„„ "'"■' '" 'V'"'' 'I'" amy «w..ur ,lio sure Kh ind >,^kf, , '"' "'' V<'Mw„otaTy tion»wit..ro.,e..tto\l',?,^'«,?,1^S;.\';;:;""^/-^[)'»',''yi"e». PEAL. 68 GO APPEAL. s not hoen put in within Art 1143 of the Code of ^ylll^.e(Jlstniss(.,i, Carter ■ 1(50, Q. IJ. 187'J. appeal should he filed in lunotary oC the Superior iiieiit appealed Croiii was le place wliere the court oucct, 10 K. L. 535, Q. li. bond for $500, when the I exceeds igliOO, in capital, ii'^iilHcienl, and will be I alter the production of •iident to have thesecu- cunty ordered within a lilt not heiiij; able to !• her appeal, n)ade over h was niort-u-ed to tlie iiid which was the very I deed in wiiich it was Id neither sell nur niort- latthey would return it ;nieut. Oiieofthesure- ■rties were worth from pretended to buy them )0. in the Corporation at $12,000. Neither the )r had the full title to 'i\. Robert & The Trust ■rf, Q. B. l,s.SO. new security not hav- 1 the delav ordered. .'i92, Q. li. 18M0. :he appellant accom- c.ouit below apijellant capias [,y ti-anslerring ifonils claims to tiie amount sued for Wci ow appeal iiij;, prayed 't he liad previously uiit three times the renewed the otter of i-ciinty lor judgment Security accepted on due oftlie liy|)othec8, t lor tlie purpose.! f- M:i, S. C. 1«80. .s made to dismiss an utlicient security, the en days in which to I & DnipeitH,. iL .N. *iit, from the Circuit 'ed to give security days— //(,./,/, tiiat in show not only that ithiii liftepn daya after It without being bound r-iillicii'iit suieilej, wlio till' .siitisr.eti 11 of the hut 111' will prosecute 'muati.iii, uiid pay the t Ix'iu^' coiiliniiuU. "■ or prothouotttry Mil uuy iiertiiiiiiitquea- I'T. im V. c. p; iirety lio uuy j,, jjgy ilge, 19U3 U. C. the fai lire to give security in time wa<. due to 10 fault attnliiitahlo to liin,-; but that lie persist" in Ins iiitentioi, to appeal at tlie^-arlie APPEAL. 70 XXXIV. .SURKTIKS IN-. 341 Where the insolvency of a surety in apjieal wa.alleged. and a new one dmniid,. ( tl e 8niv,vwasoniere,ltol..callniintobeexa,iii 'i:rw■'u''w^'e'';7'''''l'P-''^'l'H■wol,e'vas Q. ii. istJ ■' * ^''''' - '^- ''^'- •''■"' 345. Ac/ion on Boi,,}. Action on surety bond in appeal. J>lea by one of the siirene- liat he was 'iisolvent, and the plaiiiiitro,i,.ht to that the appellant was insolvent, and ||„. as : ''';^;;;;;"l.;^.-tate ought to have Uicalh.n; i'/,v/„/,„;., 2L. N. 142,S. IST') ■■' rou!-lv7'""' 'i'"''"' '»f'pc'*l''> llK' Supreme . Coi.it rom a j,t,lgiiient of tlie Court of Reyiew was allowed, and sureties iion.ls weiv entered into, nut the api^eal wa< dropped-//,./,/ ,|„a , sureties ^vere notjiahle. H„v„ll,n, J/, , W Produce Co. y. /( /.ez/wu, 3 L. X. s,3, ,S. C ISmO o47. A new surety may be substituted tor one hose real estate is proved to be of a value le s 3rx!'3s;;;Q:'H."i';:i.:"""'' ^"-''^/^--> 3 1.>^. Where a surety in appeal was p.-oved to he insolvent he was ordere.l to he re, laced I v ai.otdier.^ Onhnel & De.v„rdh,s, 3 I.. X. 108, Q. . ,341). Where sureties in a case in appeal from ajudgmeiit which was coiiHrmed t.'ildere l" costs, with a condition that the money slionM be returned m the eventof the PrivvCimcil .r,.a„t- ing a special application to appeal, and the" iid-'- iieiit being reversed on such appeal-//,:/-/, tla hey had no right to annex s„cl, a conditio and thev were condemned Iojkiv the costs nl,s^- lutely. Ga-Ur v. /•„,■,/, .'j L. ^^•;.,i2, s. c. l.SSO XXXV. To PhIVV Coi-.NTIL. 350. A motion was ma.le by the defendants in this case lor leave to appeal to the Priv Council, ami was resisted on the n;,.,„„„i i;,„, he amount was not enough to entitle the pa^ ty to his appeal. Ihe action was for S2.m ad the judgment w.as ti.r ijil.oOO, so that neither t e amount claimed by the action, nor the amo, nt ottheindgnient, would give the right to go to thePnvv Council- the -lefendiinf, ho veve Claimed tliat the future interest would .nakA up the amount. ]?„t tins future nterest was not given by the ,j„dg „;, so tliat t ere was no pretence for saying that it con d 'iv' the righ of appeal. In the case of U chei A Voyer file appeal had been refused by ,,h Court because the principal and intereit I ' manded up to the time of the action did not amount to .92 ()00. An application was „ade to the Privy Council, an,[ thereupon, no re- versing the decision here, b„t exirciiii I the m:ur:;f=^ri:;'^;;;eSJ: ^i^""""* ""=""""-- ciscret on which they have, leave to appeal w-is g'l-anted. liit that case even diilered fVon V'? present. .Motion ihr leave to nnne'i ,,. / T lWaud& Queen Insurance G>yn s' 3. .Ihe right of appeal in con'tro -.rled election cases having been taken awav bv il. Controverted Elections Act of Qiiehe .-,)'! I 'g'ative ri^dit to admit an appeal fr.r, s ' 1, -l-'cisioiis to Her .Majesty i„ Pr ., C iii.cd , i •■io2. Petitioner having been declared diiK- ^.;cedamemberoftheL„.i.bui,,.As"ml|y , Qneliec hi.s e ection was afterwards, on p 't t , taken awav except by e.^^press word- and t , i sfction nfllie above.Acl.providin,. I a ,;■,"' -nent shall n.U be snslptible :^ap,::. *f '';,-■ not mention either the Crown or its , rero'r. ret the, air construction of the at^^ A^i" :^; previcus egis ation is flmt ;, „..,-, .i • '""' or.iiH.egisba,,re,unde Si Ac" V ;;;;,?:''"''' -ii.edtolwtheCrown.tociva^'a Si^^U^ tiie purpose of trying election peti on" I, ' inanner which should make its de ^^- '? '"^all purposes, and shouulfi:^;^';';;;^ c:::;^"im':i^:'''~:al;v;^T'r'"^^'^^ f-'. nebe,^eW^;;:,tT^^!;;>y^ 353. An appeal does not lie to the P,.- C oimcil f,.,„n a judgment o the clr V Queen-s I?ench .u-deriiii: a new rial i ','/ «.^.n«/j.//.,^c.....^,„„,^-2rL!c.jii; -;Ktiilii;Sr;;;irsntt.T''''^"^ lieloiiL' to that class of i„f,:i , ''lal. does not l''"iii -neb judgments ftle ee n ' R , f'T' ..r..^;:^:; -^iffl,,- .|;-jVc S wi lie '^',n"r''''^"''-r «'''«e«'»oder the insolvent ion Statue, 40 Vic run a I if " j. .r '^^""'1- judgn,ents of the''ltrt^ ^Cn'^Betl! in .natters of insolve.icy elm 1 be fina K SLns:v'isf ^'^'' " '^ .nont of that c ,m ;„ aTe in f°"- '' •"'''*?■ vency to the Privy Councii'^ n} }iw^- l«ue to ai4«al further, l'„t that t lis ,^ ' , ~, 171, P. C. iwo •^"'' ^- ^' J' l'*'' ;)eal lies from the Supreme Court 01^ Nova Scotia to the Supreme Court ofCan- .,:M',""''' '^' '''''■''•'"■«. 2 L. N. ;i7;t, Su. Ct. IH79. 37o. The rightof apix-al to the Supreme Court IS governed bv t he amount sued for not by the amount of the judgmeiit.t Sheridan k Tlie (Jttawa A ijricullural Insurance Co. 2 L. N. 2G6, D. C. 1879. 74 ,„i. >'''■'' "PPPal ffom tlio judgment of a court or judEe wlR-reby an Hection petition lias been decidoii, sliill Op brought witliin eight days from tlie rendering thereof ; ?.l7'''''' !'.""''■. "'')""*' "''"" be brought within thirty i',iL . "'" ■■,'''!"J'« '"' "»'" "■• Iironouncing of tlie judgment ajipi'aled from. (J. 38 V. c 11 s '>i n„n w';''^'' "'""y' V"'' t'lP tJ'iiTt prop'os'ed ■ to be ap- umw '"'"!• .""■""^ ■'"''•''' """■'■'"'• "lay allow an appeal under special ciroum-tances. except in the case .fan elec i„„ ,„.tition. n<,twilhstandlng that I le same mav not he brought within the time irereii,b»r. re prpscrUieS I'hn "i'n,""'''""' •."?' '" '*"'^'' <=«»« '"« court 'or judge shall seem proper under the circumstances, lb. sec. 26. mlHl,"'i''^''' *" *''," !'"|;',«'i"i's f-nd provisions hereinafter made, ai, appeal sinill lie to the *-:jpremo Court from ,,ii hna judgmentsof ihe highest c.urtiftlna reson whWIi r such court be a court of appml or of original juriVdc ion, now or hereafter eslilJilshed in any I'r, viu«. o C.;nada, in ca.ses in which the court of orLinu J ,"i ,1,> on , a Superior ('ourt • Provided that no p ,ell ,| al bo allowed from any judgm..nt rendered i i t e 'rovl,™ ot yuebec in any case wherein the su , " r \a uo of ti matter in Qispute does not amount t wo tl o ?,ml f,TV'.rt }"' "«".* 'o "I'I'<-"1 'n civile,,*., givib' this Ai't, shall be uiider-tood to be given ii, inch cases only „s „re ,nent,»„cd .., this seciion, exee t exel ,Mme? c,,j.|s «,„! cases of mandamus, h.-ibeu; cor, , s o, n, d' pal by-laws as hereinafter provided. (;. 38 Vic Is ^7 An appeal shall also lie directly to the Supreme Cour-' byToi'il^ui'-ote'e^f 'i'i' ^^'"^ original' ju^l^^cXn sh'nll r.Tl '"''""^<"•. other judicial proceedh,g, wl ?,;; 6hal have been made in the exeiciso ot tlie Ju.iidal dis cwtion of the court or ji.dgo making the i"me • b,?t this exception shall not include deoFees and de.i" \rt rnn'=!„ i m, An appea lies directly to the Supreme toiirt from a judgment of the SiifH^rior Court, sitting 111 Keview, in cases not uii.ler «2000 in amount w-here the juilgment having been con- hrnied m Keview against the party inscribin.'. no appeal lies to the Court of Queen's Bench Ahhotf V. Mucdonuld, 21 L. C.J. 3U, S. C. K. xo77. 377. The following certificate was filed with he printed case as complying with the Supreme Court rules : "We, the undersigned joint Pro- hono ory tor the Superior Court 'of Lower Canada, now the Province of Quebec, do herebv certify that (he said defendant has ,leposite;i in out- oflice, ,.n the twentieth day of November .la,^t,thesumof hve hundred dollars, as security in appeal in this case before the Supreme Court according to sec ;!1 of the Supreme Court Act, passed in the ;Wth year of Her Ma- .lesty, chapter .second. Montreal, 17th Jan- uary, .878, Sgd.-//./,/, on .notion to ,,,,,,. appeal, that the ,leposit of the sum of five'hun! die, dollars in the liaiuls of the Prothonotary of the Court below, made by appellant without. i certificate that it was made to the satisfaction of the Court appea!e,l from or any of its luil.'es was nugatory an,l iiieflectiial as .security ior The sC278:'rct. S"'""' "" '"""''' •• «• ^' tnfjr:, r° f^'P?"' '''" '° !'"■ ''^"Pren.e Court on.afmaljiulgment of the Court of Queen's ^•r,"''^'!."'. •* proceeding under the Insolvent A.'t 131 , & 2,^ L. C. J. 5'J, Q. B. 187!) ehalt o the respondent, on the groiii d that he appellant ha,l not, within three days aier tlie registrar of the court ha,l set down he it, writing to the respotulent or ids attorney or agent o euch setting ,lown, nor applied to'aml oldained from the jiulge who triefl the petitt ur her t.me forgiving such notice a,s reo " by the 48th sec^of the Supreme an,i E.xc e uer Cour Act*-//eW, that this provision i,?^ he statute wtis imperative ; that tl.e givi,"l of such notice was a condition precedent to tie e"er cise of any jurisdiction by the Supreme C:m,t Clear the appeal, that the appe laniia ■ , fade, to comply with the statute, the oo t"t could not grant relief under riile.s 5t! or o he ,.S?^.l';r^'-^iSrliro^-;i of^^clTJ-t 'K!;:?e^;;i!d!"ctrj,r't'''„r,'' *•; •"« thirty.f.n.rih an.l'thirty in ecti'Z of ^.''i'V' '''"''• in the thirty.seventi, yi-ar, f IM 's rM.L '' ^V '"""'-'^ "An AH to Lk. ^^'/er^ ,";;/;.,•', i^'■,.^t''.•i•;'^;';•'';'l•■'' verleil Elect im., n/memhers orfliel/omlorromL,:, resfmttng matters conmvted Mer. w/ii ' Z i ' '''' pealed, except as hereinaft,.r provhie.l Witl r. „ /"" theprocwlings then isuidiUL' aiid th ;enii/ ' " '° to an eleclio,rnetltlon u,, "r h".^ At"t i,,'^? ^""l^ dissatislie, Willi the decision of tV,. j j^''/, ''?,,"''7.''^ such petition, on any question of law "l r of f ? T'\ desires to appeal againstthe same, tnay withi"n ..ii' ,,' i '"' from he day on wliicli the ju.lge ha" c V, ,1 ^ • ''^" deposit with the clerk r,M„j, ,|U. Mulio,., wlllTO- "P"" Hi.' .lu.ig, grunt<.,l tlu. a,,,,lic,..( „„ u ,1 "'"l"">'un,.r.'c..xtt.mliMKllH.(,mr fur "iJ ! "' •"•[■■^'■■•; "•'! not.c.. till (Ik. 1(1,1, ,1,7,. ',7. t>..prYn.. f.,,„.t„( ,1,, l.VI,r„arv .e.sio,, ,;,ll, .'. in^', iKMMg (I,, nearest «,„v..i,i,.,„ li.n,., ,1 noil,... ,, s,u,|, s,t(inj; ,l,nvM was ,l„iv '.-i " willm, |Ik.(,m,o nuMliomMJin ll„M.nl,.i-. \IZ cnllK.j;runn,l,l,a(a,,,,,.|lan(ur,,l„lv,iHa\' I-os..,.u,olMsap,,..al. or li.iiwl ... I.r.nj; ,| : .^h , . on t.,r hrariMj; a, ( ,c next ...s.s.on, ami ,|„„ , xtcMl tl,(. (mu. Cor jiivinj: s„ch mo( ..,. , r, ." H. (I.r... ,lav.. iVon, the (irst Hedi,,^: .1 nv , f oi,U-//t./,/ t hat tho power of the JMihrc „.|,o no. tlK. p,.„„o„ to.nak.. ,.„ onloreMT.,, K.t,,,K.|or.MVH,gMU.l>Mo,i«.,i,sa,',M,,Ta 1 .■xdiisiv.. power (o !„■ cxerdsnl aewnli,,./ somnl .liscret.on an,l (he .i,„|,.. hav,„>,„ 4 M,.., an onier ,n (he ease (lie appeal ean,epro! ' peHv lK-(oretheeoMrt for hearing. //, ' .l.>• I (o the action, e.\cep( as n mis («," I , i , • £; ™p.:;: ,iJ:':;i!;„!S ,1-;; lint. Ihe anpellant (hereupon ai.peah'l To -;^|'IMcn,e(':onr,,an,ln,ov.'.,l (o „ ' | , | ; V "''•!" "''''>'':""'""l''''l 'lie Snpe ior('o,r li'"l '"' Jnris,|i,t(ion-//,,/,/, ,|,a( ,/. ,,',•' i;:S.f.S'.;;'C,;t,?i;;-i £ H : £«rrs;.'l;''=';rj5;;',ff;,;; Lieciiiif; w (Inn the nieaniiii; of t^v <) ,,(■ ,|„. ^"l■^wne Cour( ' n.en,linent Act o( I.St'*) * sm 1 S.staS::ic::,n^,i;;w^:„^-;;:'-.,r' 'S^m rr^''';'''^'''=W'P-'ll.a.jin'isdic o,^ h" ment ot (he .Snnei'iov <',,....< i i •' '-; hints f I flnii . ' , "" """r''*''! lo appe - a the an.ot.nt of ,ia,na.e.s was rein -el ,o y/''Mi' Court- "' rt!ir/r-'■-'- «i't.ijm-.v,ai„l,Hnotshewn to have acte,' widi- II lion '•''"i.tfets, this court, as an appellate court, will linKeedi,,^!, ,",/J, ' ''J''''B''. '""I i" any case „f ca«. in whicl ,, Tu I ,", "m" ■?""» """is. and in any La- been refu4 iltt^/;,;^,;;' 'a ;;i''(M:^V'y?:''!if " ni "'o'^"""- U.«i.a,urooriLfi^;ov7„?l'£'iVroSV'i'^urc'.l\?r^''" t Vido note. „. „. ^.„^„.„_ !'■ 73- § Joyce A- Hart reviewed. ■If' EAL. 7(i ot flic Siipiviiic uihJ « IN n'siii,:(,,,j |,y ,1,^. t(i (ll'Clsidlls of" " till. 'Ki>rt" in (lie I'n.viiu'i., ml lie f'l-nii! uiiv (•(iiirl in ifc lint (lie ■Odiirt. of "" it .)f(iri/iiis, :i S. (" k Mitnloiiiihl ,\c A/,l,o/i, 'I 1WTI»; ^t linlmisl, & 'lit, Sii. (l|,,lM7:). Iiliitcil in tlic Sciporlor KllillSf tlu' l'('«|i|j|li|(H|(s, wvci-iilly Wcriiiin'cd to Unis tWu lo|s,,r|,i„il ill ^'("i (/(•fclKllUll llllil Mil ipcriiir Ciiiii't MiC llic appeal, ihe ts a pi-ojier siiliject ka in an aclioii of Islander. The jndir- rt awarded lo a'ppcl- I vindi(;tivcdainii;:es. lie Queen's Mencli, !.'es ivas rediic-ed to :aiiis( appellant, who I' Supreme Convl — to his upjieal, as, in of the Miattcr in parlies, the jiroper anioniit for wliudi and not the ainoniit AVf'/, Sii. C(. iKSl. thai where, in an tries (he case with- tohave acted upon in^' Ihe (iiianiuiii of dipi'llate conn, will ronio Toiirt in niiv cnsp t 1)1 liiilicas coiiiuH, not I'. fiiHl in any case (if niiiiidiinins, and in any licijml ((.riioraliiin liiid llic Hile lor <)iiasliiiPL' it (J. 38 Vice. ll,s.2:j. irfiTs : Can llio Motnl- I a case in wliicli the tpressly denied it ? 77 AnBITRATION. ARCHITECTS. 78 not inteifere with the discrelion snch jnd.'e lias exeivised in deterininiii,!,' the uinonnt' lo he awarded. //(. ArrEAi; AX u e— &« piiocej juije. APrilENTICES-^fie MA.STEK ANJ> SEJtVANT. APPRO I'lHATION. vj^.m-c'imL'''"''" '^"'"■"'"•-S .'■■(.'e BUILDING AKBrriJATIOX. I. AWAUII. II. J.V M.XTTKliS OkKxI'ROIMUATIOX FOR R.m. v/Av.s, ,svr ItAILWAY.^. in. lUHKOII.AKlTIKS IN, IV. roUKIi i)V AlllllTKATOUS. V. I'owha OF Cociir to aim-oint Arbi- TRATORS. VI. ilKVOUATKP- OK PolVtR OK ArIUTRATOR. I. Award. thatwhi.di would he lieforc them, and in Ihe Hl|sell(^. o( the parties if tlicv neglected or re- liised to lie present and lo oiler proof when called upon to do so. The defcndani informed one ollhearhilralors that he had proof (o make inl was not informcil of a lime or place where liecoiild oiler such proof One ofthe arhiiralors cii led III a third, aii.l, without havin- heard eitlierihc other arhilrator or the parties, .iro- '■(■edcd will, the one who called him in, anil In le ah.senc.'of the other, to render the award tie conhrmaiioii of which was now Hoii.rht \,y the m^lion. Award in coiiseipicncc dntlared 4 Q. L. Jv. .i.;2, S. C. 1878. V. POWIOR Of COL-RT TO AffOI.VT AriHTRA 388. The power ol' the Court to api.oint arhitrator.s under article ;UI of the Co,|c of I rocednre- is not conlined to matters arisi,,,, Tl i \ „ ■;"'''' '';''\'' if ''^■'"■w.n the parties hol,ert&liohat,2{ L. C. J. In, Q li i'h7(; VI. Revocatio.v ok Power ok Abhii ■rnxToR, •N.) . An award of arhitrators may be good in . part and had in part, hut onlv in ca.ses where the suliieot appears clearly 'capahle of bein.r separated, where for instance the arbitrator ex" ceeds his authority on one subject or proceeds to anotlier as to which he has no power to 22(i s"c ThV!) ^'''"•'' "■ ^''''"'^'' " ^- ^- ^^■ III. Irregi-laritik.s i\. HSli. The defendant moved to reject an award •.nade by a person appointed sole arbitrator and amiu/j/e composifeur on the ground that it did not state that the parties h;i,l been heard before mm, or had had an opportnniiv allowed them to m-ge their resj.ective uretension.s—//,,/,/, n^^^ tlie delect was ijual, an.) the mothm to reject the -'20, A;22L. C.J. 7i!,S. C. IW78. IV. Powers of Arhitrarors. .SS7. Action on an award of arbitration. Bv agreement of 31st August, 1877, two cmiahte C'^pnsicur, were named and instructeil to amea third .„ case ofdilfereiice of .Opinion. It a e the award of the two or of one of the two theycould proceed without other proof than re«pocllv,t"'or"!;",Tli!h "'''■:S''^ '"'^"^^' """l tli.ir proof, miii^n they ave hi''"''"' "* '"'" ' ""'''s" 1^/ the sub- Court of th« iSty o7befo/i'"„ "^''^ ■°^- "'« '''''''"" SuperiorCourt, 134», b. C.I. <'"'"'"'*'"°"er of '^e ."ift.b I lamtiir did work about the Imildin.r of a convent at .St. Laurent. There was a dispute as to the price and the value of the work. In I'ebruary, 1871, the parties came together and resolved to reter the matter to miiinhlc r.nmposi- teurx who were to make a report as soon as possible. After the arbitrators had taken up the mailer the defendants' arbitrator refu.sed to >ro on and made a dapoHcment. The other two, alter notitications to him, went on without Imn and made a report, although the delendantu previously notified them that ihey revoked the submission. Plaintilfthen .sued for the .amount ul tlie awani. Defendants' plea was that the award was ii//nt vires, null and void-JIr/,L tiat the award was a nullity, and the action •lilts be dismi.s.sed, as the defendants had r(nol. AECHITECT.S _ See BUILDERS COiXTRACTORS. I. Rkmuneratiox of. :iOll. Thevalueofan arcliitect'.sRervicofl may 5 l';n"34&c:i'879:''"""^- ''"" '• '""^' .,„ . ' '" " ipf«omtp, anil uNo any other ease if tun partiea consent to It. 341 C. C. P. r.^o, 7^ ' "' "'" arliitiators cannot bo revoked , SUEVEYOES. I. In action in iioRNAciE, nee ACTION. AEEEAES. ATi(?N. ^"*""^' '^' I>«'>-ATioK, .,., DON- SCKIiVtion'""''' "'' '^"J'««KST, PHK- III. Ok Taxks, see TAXES IV. Kk(!i.strationof,,v, "{EGLSTRATION AEREST->Sfee IMEEISONMENT. ^T.^ Pamaoks for, wia-N Ii.i.kgai., see DAM- n. Of Judcmknt, .,.« JURY ,n Civ,,. Casks 111. UxDKK CAPiA.s.atfc CAPIAS. AUSON—See CRIMINAL LAW. AETICULATION OF FACTS-^ee PROCEDURE. ASSIflX.MKNT. 80 .•f!)2. n„( nniH, l„. ,,l,,i,K,,| j,, onler to uvail ''^im„r,l V. Mavmii, 2 L. N. ;t;i;!, S. C. 18.S0. Id, What is. :m. CaiTviti^rrtway tlip wiiulows ofn .Iwelliiu' "US. aM,l l,.av,„K tl;e oco„,„u,tH ..xjhks.mI to u> ASSEMI',Lr:E DE PARENTS— See FAMILY COUNCIL. ASSESSMENT liOJA^See MUNI- CIPAL CORPORATIONS. ASSESSMENTS-See MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. I. For Chcrche.s, see CHURCHES. ASCENDANT DONATEUR I. Liability of, see SUCCESSION. ASSAULT. I. Conviction for, a har to Civil Action. iJ. IJamagks for, see DAMAGES. lil. UlIAT IS. I. Conviction for, a bar to Civil Action. «.K^V l^ «" action ofdaniages for assault for ".av be pleaded i„ bar o^;;^^ S r\ ^ ed S lias bPPn prpferrPdbv,Tr on hph.if'ff !?'=''""'' mPiitionpd lias obtalVip" .uch ePr.iHcato ol'^SC"' -.r.^'^' •''^«'-'"^ '' beenccnvictPdlmMinlrtfhPu^, S acquittal) or liaviiiK paid, or l,a8 M^rtho ?mprto,'Cnt'ot"''^'"'/' ''•' 'o "« with hard labor awarripri in Iv^"*. '"^ iinprisonmpnt rploasPd from an mrthPr' and n.7 """' ''"':."' '"" '''»" be criminal, for the samP c„,."e C gS^ai? v'"- qo"' "'li' "■• of a.Iy person up'ona,^-comla?nt'y„T"y ."■■ "*"':'• "■"" inentfor.oo,nmi„rZft";i;^''l",!,„'Sly,™.»i«n or Indict. ASSESSORS. I. Or,N,oN OF IN Mar,t,.mkCase may be set A.siDK, see MARITIME LAW. ASSETS. TRACTS^"*'*"'*'''"'^'' ''" ^'^"l^IAGE CON- VENCy". ^'''"^''*='*'' ^'«'^A":. *«« INSOL- ASSIGNEE. I. I.v Ixs J- I.v Insolvency not an Aoent of thp Cre„,toks Personallv, see AGENCY ASSIGNEES. I. B,LL of, see REVIEW, Ground S OP. ASSIGNMENT. I. In Insolvency, see INSOLVENCY tees!'' ''"'''''' *'°" <^'K^'i^"'oRs, see TRUS- P0W( cv yZTo !'r711;rsam?i,'',ff'""-1'^' ""'' "'« C""^' having entlvrnadroitl«Snefo,"pn^l''''' "'o only case appar- "Imll bea cnXptent wItn.sT?r*r''"'* "'" defendant In-sown l«.half Shis iiTlI'r "'o nrosecution or on ant be a won n s ba i h!.«^.n'''•''■.''''*'^"'•'' if 'he defend- of tbedeflMidan rrsnpp. ".'?'!!;'™l^'"""'» °» behalf assault: pZ" dpd tbaf ffi. - .- ■ "'^^ '''' """""on casps trip? without loury' iT """'"-'y «PP'y «o than conrmon Suftis Pl?il„%"'.''Tu ""^ <"bpr crime indictment lb! ouarged In the Information or VMKXT. HO t'liiii'd ill onler to iivail N. -^Xi, 8. C. iHf^O. lewindowHofadwcllinfr ^•ciipniitH cxiNwcl to the J)nh,„'& VityofMont. 187'J. PxVr.ENTS-See 'OUNCIL. )U.~See MUNI- OKATIONS. V'fi MUNICIPAL mONS. ::huhches. iOES. timkCase may be set TS. MAKUIAGE CON- TATE, see INSOL- EE. AN Agent of the ;eAGENCy. EES. ', Gkounds of. ENT. SOLVENCY. rroRS, see TRUS- sband of flio defendant Bhalfof the defendant. , and tlie Court having on at tho cloee of the tlio only case appar- imiult the defendant he prosecution or on liusband if the defend- Sent witness on belialf 10 charije of common ti shall only apply to 3Cx'(ion, this Act stiall lere any other crime n the information or 81 ATTACHMENT. ASSOCIATIONS. I. lE.i.E(!Ai„aee OIIANOE A.SSOCIA'ilONS. ASSmiANCE-»SVe INSUKANC]-:. "ATALAYA" THE. mkv^'Vi'^r''"' °*"' ««« FOREIGN ENLIST- MENT ACT. ATTACHMENT. 82 ATERMOIEMENT. I. Ei-FKCT OF DEEt> OF, See OBLIGATIONS Novation. ATTACHMENT. I. Uefoke Judgment, A()i(l llii; ;iroiiii(l., ol' llic |>l.oiiiiirV bi'licr, llim ihc di'U'iidiiiit in iiiiiiK'iliiitcly ubmii to scc.rrlc lii^ properly, iimy be Hinted iiecoidiiiv' to lorin .1,",, oftlieHaiiie Code.allJioiigli that loriii is .riven ii' connection with unolher article. Id. "^ FoR.M OF Affidavit for Attacume.vt before JUDOlaENT. A. I^, said Plaintifl (or agent of said Plaintifl) lieingdiily sworn on tlieHoiv Kviiiigelisi,-, ,|„th defjose and say :— That heretofore, to wit, at Montreal, in the District of Montreal, on ihe , day of eighteen hull, lieij am seventy the said Defendant was, and still IS, well and truly and persoimjlv indebted to «aid Plaintiff in a sum exceeding five dollars currency, to wit in the sum of dollars and cent,s currency, being as and for (state brieth/ dale, place and cause of debt.) That deponent is credibly informed, hath every r ason to believe, and doth verily and in Ins cr science believe, that said Defendant is now immediately about to leave the Province of Quebec, and is secreting and making away with, or IS about to secrete and make away with estate, monies, credits, debts and effects, with intent to defraud creditors in general and the Plaintiff in particular; that the defen- (laiit IS a trader, that he is notoriously insolvent that he has refused to arrange with liis creditors or iimke an assignment to them or for their benefit, and that he still carries on his business- and deponent verily believes that without the beneht of a writ of attachment, saisie arret before judgment, said Plaintiff will be deprived of . remedy, will lose debt and sustain great loss and damage, and deponent iiath signed. ^ Hworn, taken and acknowledged 1 before at Montreal, I this day of eight- (' een hundred and I 399. Contestation of. —Where the contestation Of an attachment before judgment consists inerelv in vague and general allegations of irregularity in the affidavit, without specifyin.' any particular irregularity, it will be dismissed" Jlotte V. Currie, 22 L. G. J. 34, S. C. 1877 1 !"?■ .^I""'"^ 0/ -Respondent, who kept a hotel at Quebec, was indebted to the appellants in the sum of $361.19, for provisions and grocer ies used in the hotel. In settlement of ntr„M,';'hf "*"J"" 5 ^l^^^ ''*'*'''™ obtaining Judgment to attach the Boods and elfects of his debtor: i. In tl,e case ot the ,1,-nuer equipmr. 2. In ail cases where a." Xiitiff he produces an affidavit establishing tliat the deien ant is personally indebted to him in a 8umoxce.dlnL mmiil't"i''.*''?' «he defendant absconds or isabouf immediately to leave the province, or is secretins (or is about to secrete his property, with the Intent to defraud Ins creditors, and the plaintilT in particular or th it ?w'i'i*h' '' V™^"' "'»' ''6 '» notorloSs ly hisolveni that he has refused to arrange with his cvd^tc rV or to TY,. an «88lRnment to then, or for the r benefit aid at he s till carries on his business, and in eithe? ca^e that the deponent verily believes that without tlebmief^t of dl^miX «'«P''"''"ffw«l lose hisdebt or auftahi If H3 ATTACIfMEXT. cinMiMistanccs wore r/ot i l,.|,.,,i , "• '"." '"' ass(.>H,.,i , S2 73 ""»«'"'"'"t "•I'icli were S. C IH79 * "■ '^''"^ ^- ^''''/' 2 L. N. 405, von..v;\i:l::,:i,^ ,';-<-- on,, i,, ,..,,., "^i J .1 ^"iiin, ,111(1 tiie I iniiiti'jii" El' « i--F--'~^ he imd ,,„rchased at sherirt's sale br Vl S Ihe evKlence showed that the farm so i nr slmse, had so.newhat decreased n value Tut even the plau.tiff's witnesses ackno ledS that It was worth more tlian five times the was deoidca .1,.,'£- ,S;"/.,^te™,'£,;l ATTACIIMKNT. '"wnshi,,„(liuls„; ; ''V '" f'"'"' "■ the l''"*i"jr in onh.r,o,„u ,',,"""■ ''* "'"''• ''••'•'■'''l-'Mtudverliseh -in I ''''^' '■'''''■'''''•"• s::;;\;;i';;id-Si 'v'■""'■- Ins e„i:a^-,.>MeMt^ , , , '' '""',"'»HVs met s/soiVefM„^""""'"''''''''-^""""v''»'''"H n.av ••iWl, S. C. 1880. t./,«,6o«„a/«, 3 L. N. n. Bv Garxishment. ipiiis and va.'ueiiess of t^ I i ' ""r"''''''<;tions ti.e CO.U olil,, (,■„,, ";S! '»"■'"' 1>«"I "ll ■on. :v]„r;:;;;;shrj;r ^j. -- ■»-■ * See note. p. fi? Sttpm. Hi 'II.MK.VT. 8.J 85 ATTACIIMKXT. ATTAC'TIMKNT. 8(i * '""' ''•»• I" <''in) Mioiipv ■•'iii'i-;' on lii-. ruriii, una '■'■'""I" to «oilcu>,un a ''' ;"»• of tl,..ni in the " nil II view („ their ».v iravclliiij,' oxjicnxi'v ■< M,ov,,il,l,. ,.,-o,H.rtv, or I"., lor Null. I,y ,1,1,., i„„, ""I/', NIIC.I «,lt II ,.„/,,,•,, iimkintr tl .. usual mii. J Ik* (li'I'ciMlant |,r(iv(.,| "•"<• a ;;o,„| cliuiacter, 'Ivfiit, |i,i,| always im., I'j'i tlie action in ,i,i,.s. I'l I'vtT been instili,t,.,| tlifH' was ii„ fviilcncc !'■ )'!"•' o(( he, l<.r,.,i,hi,il waH|„.,.,i,oi|y Hccircl' "■as (-ntiiviv Mi,f,)„„,|. Q. I^li.21(), S.CK, '•— IinniovcahleH ninv oC ■■'a/sie avvil |,(.|i„v Jiarboiinmu, 3 I, N "'"■fee's ncchtni/ioi,. 'ami (ifomlitors may I'M the contestation i',|' '. Q. li. hSKO. icciaration ,iis,nisRe,| to the inipiTtcctions '^ration. CaM/ier A- • ;My. S. C. 1879. >' ft party in a case ilcstcii. naclKiiid V • •^^'•», S. C. 1879. ' tnade hiH declaration " that in which the ouoUuy neglecteij to I time, tlie garnishee tayed until ii dcilsioii on the nieritH of the aliiirjiiiient — lli/il, iiiiiinlainiii,; tilt' exception. (J'll'd/onin \ /{arldir, .'1 Ii. N. i71, .S. C. 18H(i. 4!!. A creditor wlio.se claim has been ' attached in j;,irnlshmeiit by one to whom be owes 1111)11, -y may, nolwitlistiiniling, sue ami . obl,iii, i,iil;,'ment ilfiaiiist his , id, lor, but in such casi' the court will onliT ihat the jiidLMiieiit b,' MTved upon the plaiiitiirainl on U\« tiers niiiKi l^'i iliiys before its execution. Cre.ltassa v. Vic. ile C/iitminde Far de Slid A\t, 8 U. J,. 722, C. C. 1>S7H. 414. The existence of a previous siiisie arrt'l in the hanils of the delendiinl.s as ;;ari,isl,,.es ilot's not prevent the )ilaiiitill' ((lefeiidant in a pri'vioiis suit) fnjin sei/.inc.' m,)ncys ,l,ie tu de- fendants in the ban, Is of other carnishees, Miirlaiii y, Itdiilli iV Tlie li'iiik iif .}f(,iihe,il, 1 L. N. 1(11, .t 22 L. C. J. 22, S. U., an,l I L. N. 2(ii;, S. U. R. IH78. 4i'). .Vn attachment by fiarnishinent is not dissolve,! by an appeal" from the judirment un.ler which the -itachment is n,a,|e.' Dr.ynr- diiin Ac Oiiiinel ic i rrmtU,2 L. X. 191, s'. C. 1879. '' l(i. Contestation of an op|)ositi„i, by an assiiriiee. The ,,i:"sti,)n was whether a s'nisie- arri't, altachiiii; monies di.e by the ins,ilvent, was superior to the ussjfrnee's claim— //<■/,/, that iUv saisie-itire/ ainoiinied to iioihiuir until the sei/.ini; party jrot jml^imenl ; tbi-n he w,);il,l have a vested ri;,'ht with which other pe,iple coiilil not interfere. Here the contesiinj; parly got liis juiljimeiit only after the insolveiicv had taken |)luce, and the assignment prevenle,! him from acipiiring any rights whatever. Opposi- tion of assignee maintaine,!, ami conteslation dismisse,!. Lapierrc v. Tessier & Farmer, o. \j. 1871). 417. The plaintitr was a jmlgnient creditor of ,lelendant in his quality of curator to the vacant succession of the late X. D.. and lodged an attachment in garnishme' ' in the hands of the Guarantee Co. The Company ,leclare,l that they had in their hands a sum ol$")70.24 belonging to the succession, but that they held it as a special security to secure them against any claims which might be brought against them umler certain bomls given bv them to the Queen, whereby they guarantee,] the good con,luct of the said A. 1). The lieclaration on contestation was niaintaineil. McNicliols v. Jiadeim it Canada Guarantee Co., 3 L. N. 133, S. C. 18.^0. 418. n.v y. I'iiiindiiin Miifinil Fire Iiisiinmce Co.. 1 L. .V. ;i4(), S V. 1m78. 42(1. ()/' l>i'l>/f /,'// //c< r/Hc— AltaehinenI in llie hiinils of the Soci,'>|(^ de Ciiislruction, gariii-hees, on the lllli of Mari'h. of a ,|,'lit not due by them to defeielani until the next iliiy — {/lid, that as at the momenl of the alia, ■hii, till the garnisjiee owi',1 ii,ilhing to ih'fendant. tliiil the attachment was invalul ami Ihe ileilaration of the garnish, -e was main- taine,!. Miilsiiiis' liiink V. I.imini.i k, ]/t Siirii'te de CnHstriiction Mnlnelle den .Ir/i.iiin.i, 3 L. \. ik;, ii, 21 L. c. J. i7t;. s. c. it. isso. 421. 0/ .•<„l„ri/ of I'lildir 0/liier.f.—\n attiudimeiit against tli'c ileleinlant. an emphwee ol till' (Quebec (>i vernment was issne,| under the pr,,visi,,iis ol (,2.38 Vie., cap. 12. Th,' li,ad of the ilepartment in wlii,-h the ih-lemliint was einployeri i|,.c|,ire,| that tlier,. was ..otliing ,lue to the delemlant at the time of the atlaidimeiit, but that he was in re,;eipl of a salary ,prS129.:i4 per month. The |ilaintill' thereujion move,! that tht' attachment be conliniicl, ami that the fieri fiiii.si, the lirovincial secretary, shoulil lie licM to make a further ileclara'tion on the lilleenlh of October then next, ami on the lilleenth of each of the months of November, December am! January, then next, ami on every (iillowiiig month ,so long as tiie ilelemlant remaine,! in the employment of the (Jovern- meiit, am! until the plai'ntills claim .shoiiM lie pirn— Held, that as there was no one upon whom an order bimlmg as a jmlgment coiil,! be mmle, the curt w,iiil,l simply ,!eclare that the seizable part of ilefendant's salary, so long as he shoiil,! continue to be employed as a public ollieer, might be pai,l to the plaintiff until his claim wasilischarged. Biirke v. Colfer ic I'lKinel, (i y. L. R. 349, S.C. 1880. in. CoN-atiiivAToRv, see PRIVILEdl'; of VKXIIOH. -122. A person who conveys timber down a river according to agreement has a right to a conservatory attachment on saiil timber, until Ins charges for conveyance are pai,l. Trudel v. Inilifin,! R. L. 177, S. C. 1874. 423. Wliere gooils were seized by an attach- ment in revemlication, and it was" prayed that 111 case the revemlication did not lie "that the attachment might avail as a conservatory jiro- cess, jmlgment went accordingly. Henderson & rreinliliii/, 21 L. C. J. 21, Q. B, 187(i. 424. The hol,!er of railway kinds, constitu- ting a privileged claim on the moveable |iro- perly of the Company, may, for the protection of Ins rights, proceeil against such nroperty by an attachment in revendication in the nature of a saisie eoiise.n-iitoire. IVi/att v. Senical ct al., 1 L. xV.98, A:4Q.L. R. 7li, S. C. 1878. IV. In- Revendication, see TRANSFER. I'R.UUlll.EXT. . '*-5- Apf'^acit in.— In an action in revendica- tion by default the affidavit on which the writ 87 ATTArrrMKXT. lifl i fei..nl?^m,,f 'S;:' ;iz r°"' "«r"^* "■<• J"'""'l"n, ui.l,,., ',„ ;"^, '"7 •^"-"'•■".M .1,,. «!=""" lu. l,aH,.,| „„ , JZr, '' "'"'"NV'I. Il„. ATTACH3IEXT. 88 l"'"l I'Hck, not nhvavM , t """" .f't' "nonrv is ;;;'"rnu-t n„.,|„ .„„ ! , "lJ>"'«1"'\ '" 'ill [!"''.'"i'v, o,u ,; :; 'l'r\';;,'"^ p.u-...r,iHs ' Ua.n!,,- ]2.(|.J,S .Vjr, f' "nnkco " a,„| ';yl'i". |.MM„ ;.."','^;'7;'l' •^'•^M.H. ..„, frol,, ,|„. rest V,' "'"'"^l",j:,„..|,al.r' ♦ '^<;orn .ii,| nut I'lon.'r:':^'''';, I'l''"'l'''l H.at 'Jf liver it. BeM,|,s (hi VJ'',"'*\''^'i''''l ". 'e action wa.s 1 ;1„ l'/; i;'''"'. "i"! finally tl.e seller ,0 revemi ch^^m'''' ""■"■ "^ <'""'lt' credit. 2. Tlie thin ' "«' '"*^''' '"'^n "mde on ^a-ne eon.litiin.' ^7,'r,V'' "'""•'■ "'"^ '" "'" parsed into the liai.ds of I'^H '•'"."' "'^ '"»^'p !'«« pai.l for it No,>e of m'"'' '"'^'>' »'"' fxistedhere. It was 8a,\J H ,''T' '=""<'''ioM.s '""i.no interest To ur^^ tt^' th« r.-npondwu parties. He n.iVl ; 1 ^ "'^ '■'fe'''ts '>f third Jnidithave intefiene'r R^''^^"' «• '-« Wa rijrhtio vili- . r.^*Ponilent, huuever fould ha^^ ZZ U.ertit'h '" '^i'- «<=''°'' appear that respondent^ r'/ ""/ '^ "^'O''!'' >a« not m..tained The Zr ■' .°'^ P«^«esgion ^el'i the corn for B u-ho 1 'i'T^ ''"*t J'e ^''a^-ed it and paid for ft I "» '^»"''">' P'f"r:!.di;:;;it ^^ ^'-'''^ •- '/'/:' 'Im- s2,id sect lun r r V r'"'"'^"""'- '-,•, "''^endicntion will 'lo 1 • ,. F''"'''''-^a;r!^r^'^^ -Si;t!;':eSx..::;'7:S'i^^-t-'^"''.. Moriliral, » her., they \nllt,T'} "'"' ^'^ '<' "■'■r''Mill Ivin. in flK ■„«?.'' 'iy"'''''''''' ""'I '■'■'"""' "'"' 'I''' I V -had n r ^'""^'■•-" '!'« '■-""<■ iMs„lv,.|it--/>,// '." "i.c.'neanii,,,,. he- ■''■'''' '''■'•'"''''iUlHi^hr/r'"''''^ "'•■I'""'- ''-?'i-u'd";hatTS^"'rr"'««^- ^"■'-■ l^aid that her hiisl., , , ..^SryT'""' "'"' leased the carrln.r,. • '"""';'''.' Iiad boii;;lit or """ <''liiH sMeces'i;,,, /'"^'■'"•'•'o^-'^' "Hs ,,„r attS;n;!J:t intS.nd'::'r-^^;'!^'« "'at an valrn. IS ,1 ,i ' r*'' rr''" *'''''^'' ^''•snp no '879. ^^•''•^''''«'^'^^-C.J.250,S.C. 1{. -.ioni^:S:;i-J",«;|-'.-ontinrevendi^ "."■""^■^■«I'1<'S am >,';„' '^'•«* .noyeahles or pace where flK.nroneHl-^'':?''?'''' ''" tl't" Of UsuPRi^er ok Moveables. V.LuB,UTvro„ru,KOA,.I«srEopWn„,or. a.Sr'^SiC'irsifr-'!'^^'''""'^-'- .)"t liable in ,]«,„. m.sie-arri^t before '"(■ u'ted in C. J. bat ert, 2;i A.1LE8. Jre and thinjfs consumed de- l^ 'leld in usn- by the creditors & I'epin, 6 ;ood8 ^ffr droit m clainiinf; to the hands of a % cause is un- N.21I,Q.B. ver is saH'flofi Sfes.-iiiii ot the HO ATTORNEYS AD LITK.M. ATTESTATION. I, <'^, Claims iv Inhoi.venov, «ee IN80L- jV. Ok Wills, ««« VVILIA AITOKNKV— &c AGENCY. ATTOHNKVS AD LITEM— &e AD- VOCATES. I Akk not liabi.k k(»r Baimcf's Services. II. AlTIIORIZATKIN OF. III. Cannot recover Costs while Action I'fcNDINO. IV. Death or. V. Disavowal OF, »ee DLSAVOWAL. \ f. Ki.KCTioN ok Domicile. VII. Evidence of. VIII. Fkks ok. IX. LlAUII.ITV OF. X. ScnsTITI'TIONOr. XI. Withdrawal op, I. Are not liaule for Bailiff's Services. 4,^f,. Unles.s there is an agreement to that ellecl, or the attorney has received the nionev liuni bm client, he is not liable personally to the bailirtkir iiis lees for services. Gtlinas v Du mmt, 10 R L. 229, C. C. 1H80. Thm-oux v. Pacaud, G Q. L. K. 14, S. C. R. 1879. II. Authorization of. . 4,37. Where a proceeding by a foreign plaintiff IS begun by the plaintiffs affidavit no power of attianiey is necessary. McLare^i v. //„//, 2 L. N. 178, S.C. 1879. 4il,H. Action by two attorneys to recover their costs and expenses in conneoticjn with the filin" ol an opposition to the sei ureof the defendant's effects. An attempt was made bv the plaintitF to prove the mandat bv parole, which was not allowed by the court. The defendant was then e.xaminedasa witness, and admitted that he had authorized his brother-in-law to resist the seizure under a ju,lginent rendered against tiie •lelendiint. Mandat as given by the brother-in- aw lield to be proved, and judgment according- 1875 '^^'"^ '■ ''^""'^"«"'^«' ^ K- ^- 246, S. C. 4,19. Where the plaintiff's, an insurance com- pany, described themselves as " a body corpor- ate and politic " auly incorporate*! according to law, and having its head office and principal p ace of business in New York, in the State of New York, one oflhe United States of America, and having an office and doing business in the i^ity and District of Montreal— /7eW, that they YT,°,^J'^^'l'°J''«» P'^^^er of attorney under Art. 120 C. C. P. The Globe Mutual Life In- surance Co v. The Sun Mutual Life Insiirance ^"•'l li N. 139, & 22 L. C. J. 38, S. C. 1878. 44U. Iho mandate of an attorney ad litem ends with the judt'inont. and unless auK^o. uuentiy renewed a service on them will not bind the principal. Booth v. Lacroix et al. & Hol- land & Dupuy, 21 L. C.J. 307, S. C. 1877. ATTOHNKYS AD MTK.M. 00 ITT. Cannot recover Costs while Action l-ENIIINri. 441. .\n attorney ad ///cw cannot recover fnun a client his cisfs In suits which are still peiiiliiig mill iin,l,'ci,leil. Muliiiiii v. J-'ilzi/vrald. 3(M„ ll.;wi,C. C. 1S77. IV. Death ok, 442. Thclcalh ,^f one of plaiiiliirs altorneyg lilies iiiit iiualiilulc proceedings had in the case as if bolb were still such alturnevs. Moriii v, Iknderiton, 21 L. C. J. 83, S. C. 1870. VI. Election OP Domicile. 443. Where an attorney has made no election of domicile, service upon him is propi'rly maile at the nrolhoniilarv's nlliee. JfidiiT/Knu Si Marlow & Fairver, 2 L. N. 181, S. C. 1879. VII. Evidence of. 444. The attorney of record, even in a non- commercial case, may be heard as a witness on behalf of his client if parole eviiieiice be uilinis- sible. Ker. Danifs rrsulinen v. Ki/d)!, 6 Q. L. R. 38, C. C. 1879. 445. But in another case hel,l that an advo- cate em|iloyed as attorney ad lilem in a cause cannot tesiifv as a witness in it. Boisvert & Bernier, 9 R. L. 509, S. C. 1878. 44(i. And in appeal, said to be a great abuse for lawyers to give evidence in their own > asea whenever it can be avoided. Molaon & ( arier, 3 L. N. 268, Q. B. 1880. Vm. Fee-sof. 447. The formality of a judgment is not necessary to give the attorney ad litem a right to recover his just fees ii'nd disbursements against his client, if the proof and the circuin, stances establish that there has been a settle- ment out of court and that the litigation is at an end. O'Farrellw h'eriprvritii Mininti Co 4 Q. h. R. 198, 8. C. K, 1869. ' 448. The fee for rehearing will be allowed when the delibinl is disehurged without the fault of the attorneys ami a rehearing ordered. Grosleau k (^lehec N. S. T. Road Trustees, 4 Q. L. R. 203, .S. C. 1878. 449. The attorney of an incidental defendant, upon an incidental dt uiand brought bv the plaintiff under Art. 149 of the Cale of I>roce. dure for the addition of new grounds of action and dismissed upon a demurrer of the inciden- tal defendant, has no right to fees. Bouad y. Bonnet, 5 Q. L. R. 72, 1879. 450. Where an attorney in Quebec receives instructions from an attorney in Ontario to take action, and does so, he cannot come upon the client of his correspondent for his fees ami costs, Keller & WaUon, 2 L. N. 400, C. C. IX. Liability op. il ^ .|vi 451. Professional attorneys who carry on business under a firm name are jointly and severally liable for moneys collected by the 91 AUCTION. g™u'. S'!"' ^^ ^"•^"•^■"' 22 L. C. J. 205, X. Sl'nsTlTUTiO.V OP. 4o.l A motion for leave to anneal niav l„. 8.j:.u.d l,y one of the attor„ov,s wZ ann •«■■ • record ,n the court belou- wi'thou Vi U, , ' 1880. '''"''■««'•* C-Ziurc/i, 3 L. N. 391>, Q. b! XI. VVlTHDf ■ \L OP. 454. It is in the discretion of the court to uLcJ:' T'""' '"' •''■'«'" '^^ "ithdra^ ro n t eta>e,ou>r.vu,g uotice to the adverse par v AWARD. 93 AUCTIONEER. I. LiAiiaiTv OF, see SALE. AUTHENTIC ACTES-^.. DEEDS. AUTHOPJTY. I. Of «™,v^~'r.ss,fe^':jSK ATTORNEY GENERAL AUCTION, I. KiGHT TO J)i; PRKSEXT AT n. Sales hv, i-nukr Do.mixiov I\s,„vivn AUTIIOEIZATION. I. Op Attounky, .see AGENCY ni. Op Markikd Womkx, see MAUUIAGE. AVEU JUDICIAIRE-^fee EVI DENCE Admissions. AVIS DE PAEENS-&e FAMILY COUNCIL. AVOWAL~^«e AVEU. AWARD. I. Lv Abbitratio.v, see ARBITRATION". ' 'm 'S—See DEEDS. B. >O0At, Li:f;isr,ATiri!Ks LATIVE AUTHU- SUMMARY OF TITLES, see MAUHIAGE. -See FAMILY BAGGAGE BAIL BAILEE RECEIPT BAILIFFS BAILLEUR DE FONDS CLAIM BAILMENTS BALLOTS BANKRUPTCY BANKS BANK SHARES BAPTISM BAR BARGAIN AND SALE BARTER BASTARDS BEACHES BENEFICIARY BENEFIT SOCIETIES BEQUESTS BETTING BIDDING BILAN BILL OF LADING BILL OF PARTICULARS BILLS OF EXCHANGE, &o... BIRTH BOARDING HOUSEKEEPER.. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Page. 95 95 95 95 90 90 97 97 97 104 104 104 105 105 105 105 105 105 lOG 106 100 107 107 107 107 118 118 119 BOARD OF TRADE BOATS BODILY PEAR BOND BONDS BONDHOLDERS BONDSMEN RONS BOOKS BOOK DEBTS BORNAGE BORROWING BOTTOMRY AND RESPON- DENTIA BOUNDARIES BREACH BREAD BRIBERY BRIDGES BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT BROKERS BUILDERS .'. BUILDING AND JURY FUND. BUILDING SOCIETIES BURIAL BUSINESS BUTCHERS BYE-LAWS Page. 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 120 120 120 120 120 120 121 121 121 122 122 123 124 124 120 126 126 126 95 BAILIFFS. ! '.I BAGGAGE. I. LiABii.iTv FOK, see CARRIKKS. IhUL—See CItlMIXAL LAW. I. I.\ Ca.sk op Caita.s «(-c C \PJAS. II. VV IFE CAX.NOT W. Kdit HlSUA-VI), nee MAR- UIAOE. BAILEE RE('EII'T_&e BAIL- MENTS. BAILIFFS. I. Fkes of. ir. .JlKISDICTlOX OF. iU. IjlAHlI.lTV OF. ly. May iif Witnesses. V. PoWKK.S OK. vI\J!"""' "^ ^"^''^ against ATTOK.NEYS rOK b KES. VII. Status of. I. Fees of. 1. A liailifl not residing in t.,e chef-lieu of IIS district IS not entitled to ol.arge for trave ron. his residence ,o the ^.Vjurt houlo and hack to the place ot service, the latter being hetween his residence and the Court house. La liZ eleconde de la Parume de Berthier in re t Rahton, 8 K. L. 748, S. C. 1878 11. Jurisdiction of, 2. A bailiff does not cease to have the ri^ht to act m the district in whicli he was first ap- pointed by removing to another and actii^ Gau/ner^^ L. N. 243, & 24 L. C. J. 174 S. black C. 1880. '■'^' S. black C III. LlAIilLlTV or. 3. Where a bailiff, resident in another district, and charged with the execution there of a writ issued in iht district of Montreal, fails iinhle to in.prisonnient in the district of >;ontreul. Gnaediiiyerii. Derouin, 21 L. C. J. 2J0, S. C. 4. Where a bailiff, by irregularities in his re- tuni, gives rise to an exception to the (brin, he is Jiabeforthe lo.ss occasioned thereby. Maior V. Vkarirand, 21 L. C. J. WA, C. C. 1877. IV. May nE Witnesses. 5. A bailiff who has acted in a case may be examined asawitness, provided that it is not to prove conver.^ations had or admit^nons made at Uie^iine ^-^^^^Oarne^n. y. Courekene, G BAILMENTS. 96 V. PoWEHS OF. . fi. .f^ailirtsareofficersoftheSuperiorCourtfor .ludicial, natters, an,! outside of that their cert i' I879! • * -•' ^- C. J. 314,8. C. r UK r hhh. or^tl.^'l',?" "'"T '' ^" '*g'-ep'"ent to that effect, or the attorney has received the money from his client, he is not liable personally to the bailitl for his fees for services GeUiZ v T), nionl, 10 It. L. 229, C. C. 1880. 8. Action against an atto-ney for balance of an account for bailiif's fees for s^rv^es Defend ant pleaded a special agreement that plan iff shotjld have no right^o look to ieCdant until and unless defendant himself had received I laintiff Has entitled to receive for the said ser- 7^*''-.„.\""9«''i""J-' the alleged a.'reement the t^d"!;;' ,rri' '•"' ^ ^r^^ •« (u^ziit ted tiiat in practice he observed it in order to obtain the defendant's practice. The joTnt nro- thonotary proved that according to tl e ecord^ ■n hiscusto,ly the plaintiff perlbrmed t he eer! vices mentioned in certain schedules, amo uitin" iu'^^:"^'?r^'' 'r^' '° ^•^"""•'"^^ ...ore tlia'-n the amount lor which credit w.-xs given-/W Tit:i^l?^^'^r '^'^'^'"'^'"^ "as-in-suffictnt: I hat adm, ting that an attorney is per.sonally .able or the fees of the latter, it does not tlTere^ (ore follow that a bailiff who iias performed ser- vices in a case can hold the attorney of record, merely as such, liable for the bailift^s fees w^ h- out proo Of any kind that the bailiff had been VII. Status of. of A,.f -r I 'fi "°^^P"''"= officer in the sense entftliw "^ "'^^''■^ "' P'-ocedure so as to y % W ^^"^ '"?"t'« "otice of action. Major v-Umr/rand, 21 L. C. J. 803, C. C. 1877\t Major V. Boucher. 21 L. C. J. 304, C. C 1877 BAILLEUR DE FONDS CLAIM. I. JIay he oitouND OF Capias, see CAPIAS II. Kegi.sthation of, see REGISTRATION. BAILMENTS— See DEPOSIT. I. Bailee Receipt. II. IIoTEi. Keepers. LiahilUy of. in. LlAIlir.lTV OF P. UI.EE. IV. Proof of Deposit. I. Bailee Receipt. 10. The plaintiffs attached in revendication certain goods which they had received as collaterafs,,cunty for .^ dr.aft which they had discounted and had intrusted to one Parker the acceptor of the draft, since insolvent, for sale 97 BANKS. BANKS. 98 INST Ati'oknkys taking from him the following bailee receipt: " Reccivnd from the Merchants Bank of Canada B. L. for 1,284 hams, 100 slioiiliierH and 10 pie-'^'* of bacon, and I hereby undertake to sell the property therein specified for account of the bank, and collect the proceeds of the sale or sales thereof, and deposit the same in the said bank at iMontreal to the credit of acceptonce 2,414, due July 11th, hereby acknowledging myself to be bailee of said property tor said bank "—Held, that the bank did not lose con- trol of the goods, and on the bailee becoming insolvent had a right to revendicate thoni as pledged for the amount of the acceptance. Merchants Bank v. McGrail, 1 L. N. 231. & 22 L. C. J. 148, S. C. R. 1878. II. HoTEI-KEEPEUS. 11. Liability of .—A traveller brought action for the loss of a pocket book containing money and valuables, which hud l)eun stolen from his bedroom in a hotel while he slojjt. The hotelkeeper pleaded non-liability, in that he had taken all precaution incumbent upon him, that he had provided the doors witii good locks and bolts, andpl.i 'd a notice in the room warning the occur)elow, that notwithstandiirf these precautions he was bounij to prova thai the thett had not been committed by some per- son belonging to the hotel, and that failing to do this the plaintitf was entitled to recover. Geriken & Gninius, 21 L C. J. 265, Q. 13. 1876. 12. And held, also, that the oath of the traveller in such cases was suflicient not only to establish the value but the fact ofthe loss. 10. in. Liability of B.uleis, see PLEDGE. 13. A person who takes a horse to pasture is liable for injury to the horse by accident, such as having its leg broken, unless he can prove that he was no way in fault. Bilaiuier v Oui- ner, 9 R. L. 530, S. C. 1879. IV. Proof of Deposit. 14. Action to recover the value of a horse which had been placed in defendant's charge to be pastured, and which he said ho had giveli to one Decelles, an employee of the plaintiff, by authority of the latter. Decelles had come tor the horse, received delivery of him, and then ran oil to the States— //eW, that neither the depot nor the restitution were provable bv witnesses, and the avcu of the defendant shoulcl not be divided against him. Jokiisua v. Loiu/- tin, 3 L. N. S6, & 24 L. C.J. 292, C. C. 1880. BALLOTS. Counting of, see ELECTION LAW. BANKRITPTCY-&.C INSOLVENCY. BANKS— ^See COMPANIES, COIiPO- EATIONS. I. Appeal ur in Ix.soLVENcr. II. Contracts by Resolution of Board. lil. I'Al.SE ReTIRNS. Jiidirlmeiilfor, see CRIMINAL LAW iV. Insolvency of. V. Lkttkrs of Credit. VI- LiAiiri.iTY of. Oil stock held as collateral securili/ for interss! on deposit. •' •' baVl.ments!" """'" ^""'' ^^'^'''''"' ''' VIII. Loans and Deposits. IX. Over drafts. X. Powers of. May advance money on secitrifi/ of goods. fluy advance money on securi'ty'of shares vrV 'l'/""'** '"■" ^^'■^" '*K«ARD vo Deposits. All. iRANSFER OF Shares. I. Appeal IN Matters of Insolvency. 15. Where a bank is in.solvent, or it is .soucht to put It into insolvency, an appeal lies from every order or judgment of the court or a judge, but where such order or judgment is an interlocutory one, leave must first lie obtained in the usiia manner. Mechanir.s Bunk v. .sy Vic'ca S"*^ L. N. 315, Q. B. 1879 ; C. 39 II. Contracts Created by Resolution op the Board. n ^^' ^f-r'^ '° *=''"^P«' ">e Jefendants, the Bank ot loronto, to complete a deed in con- ..rmitv with ,-, re,solution oi the board of direc- tors. 1 he died was to grant delay to plaintiff to pay a deot /ina \m '*^^'' ^ ^"^ ^- ^' "^^ ^^'^' ^'- ^^■ «,.,„. .*'*'-''"; !!"""''• "I'"" " ">oiion supported bv 8UC 1 po imiis <,f the record a.s may be iici ssar? to appcnl "«,',d'f;ni «/;!;'«""'"' '? '.""-''""■"^ «"^OF?ib'le of lift. 111!) ac. I'. """^ "'"^ ""*** 8peciHetf in Art. t The making of any willfully fah ■- or docentive stnto ment n. any account, statement re . -n' ?e™?t or ohlr" document respectinpr the all'airs iCtlie lAnkslml unless it a>uounts to a hlKTuT ollenfe, be a mi de ueLi or and any and every president, vice.presi,le„t/ d r4 "o" prin- cipal partner eH ,;,miwni,ni,; iuditor tna Zer r.iJ, ^^ or otiier offlcer oltlie bank, [irepiiH p s S^ammn ?^ oronncurnnK in such statl.lnem, ret. r.^ renoVt' 'r doe * any party, shal be held to have uillfully mu.ie such falKB ^Uitenient, and shall further be respu is bl, tW ,M damages sustnued by such !„r,y ja conL «, nor. ,'....' Kj. Oi \ ., (.. o, J>. Oa. fh?L*"' *^ X' *;• '^' * ""^^ statement i.< fulistituted for regard tSu! """''' '"'"'"='*' "'"' '"'''' '"'«■■» «nactedwUh 99 BANKS. BANKS. 100 IV. Insoi.vkxcy of. IH. On the 2(itli of AiiRiist a detnand for n writ (it iittuclniiciit, umler the IiisulvtMit Act 1S75, against tlie Mechanics Bank, wa.s jire.-'enteil toa.jn(l>i;c 111 Ciiainhers. Tlie hank asked lor a [irovisional onh'r givini,' them notice of tiie (leniand. Tiu" onlor was given tlie same day notifying liie banlf .' the lieurmg on the merits of u demand lor u writ of altuchment for the 21)tli August. Tlie notice was served tJie 2()tli, ami the L'Dth tlie parties appeared, when the hank opposed the deniand fur a writ of altacli- liienl for the fulltiwlng reasuiis ; JJecau>e the demand fur a writ could nut be nuule hefure the 27tli Aiign-^t, seeing that the hank had siispendoil payment the 28tU .\[av, ami the itO days granted to the hank iiniler the |jrovisiuiis of the Act only e.\pired the ^(Ith Aiigu-t; He- cause tiie order of the judge wliicli was written on the demand had I mi given without the notice reqnireil liy law; IJecanse the allidavit of the intervenants was daled the 'iiith, heliire the e.vpiratiun of the itO dav.':— //f/,/, that the hank liaving su-pended iiaynient uii the 2Stli .day, us admitted in the preliniinarv answer of the liank, the 2Sth must count as' the lirst uf the 'M days diirng whicli the bank cuuld re- main in siisijeiision according to tiie terms of 'M Vic. cup. ;ii, sec 2* and tlierefore the 2.3th August was the iUlih day, and the demaml w.is rigluly made oil the 2()th. Mtr/i,niii-s Bi/iik & iSY. Jcuii i:t al; 'J 11. L. .')55, S. C. LST;). r.». Ami there was no notice of tlie order of the judge necessary, lb. 20. And that tiie creditors of the hank, being m a better position than the judge to decide what should be dune, tiie court belure deciding as to tiie issue of a writ appointed an assignee with instructions to call a meeting of the credi- tors of the bank, in order tliu'; thev niiL'ht adopt .such resolution.« as they deemeil best and submit them to the judge "accurdlng to the terms of sub-sec. 5 of sec. 147 of the Insolvent Act 1875. t [b. V. Letteiis of Cukdit. 21. Verdict of jury set aside as to measure of damages sntlered by canceliatiuii of letters of credit and new triarordered.+ n,ink of Toronto & Aii^cU, 7 K. L. 262, Q. B. 1875. VI. LlAltTMTY OP. 22. Action on a deposit account kept by the jilumtiir in the defemlaiit'.s bank for the sum of yi,7:i2. 18, which hud been charged against the plaiiitill'in his puss-book and in the bunk lediier, hut which In- declared he had never withdrawn, llie plaintitf, before bringing his action, had »\i) apiiliciition for n writ of altaclimiint agni;i«t niul no HPi^ijiiiiii lit ofthe .'.state siiall \»' inmle until ufter the buiili has. w iietliiT Ijef'ore or since the passing of this A'.t, become insolvent by iir.»iHMisicin of iiaynii'iit for ninety (Javs under tlie iirovisions of tlic 87th f.-ction of nil "Act rolatiiif; to Hanks and I!anl.init," passed iu the 84th year ot Jlei- .Majesty's reign, cluiii. Uve! t The resolutions so adopted sliall be submitted to tlip jinlKeat tlie time and placi.' appointed at the nieetinir Biiil at lea-t 48 liouis notice slmll be given by the Olhcial Assignee to tlie (Jompauy of Ihe time and pl«ce so flxed. X 1 Dig. p. 143, Art. 39. ' called on die plaintilFs to produce the ciie.ine, liiit this they had failed to do, allhou-h bv ti'eir plea they alleged that all the plaintiffs clie.|ues had been returned to them. Defendant-, iu act, admitted that the cheque had been mis- laid, hut sought to prove bv evidence tliut the cherpie was drawn by plaintiff ami paid bv theinselve.s. It was certain that it had been paiil, and the evidence as to the mode ot iMvim' It was as follows, viz:-" The clerk to wiiuiu ^^ the disjmted cheque was presented, aiid bv whom It was accented, says: A few duvs ^ before the Kith of .lanuarv, a low-sized man, whom Idid not know, presented the checine. 1 ascertained that there were no fuiKls to " pay It. I submitted it to Mr. H., and he ;' told me to tell the mm to present it again, as lie presumed it would then he all ri'dit I 'told tins to the man. He replied that It wa.s ^^ straiige, as the plaintdl' had written to him ^^ortulil him that there were sufficient funds. A day or two afterwards, a deposit was made to the credit uf ilie plaintitf, and twodays after the same per.s„n returned with the cheque, l''>-'e it is all right.' I .-aid, } PS. 1 he witness al.so .said he knew the plain tilfs signature, and was po.sitiye that it was Ins writing at the foot of the cheque, and bein>' now examined Ibr the defendants, said he was not sure if he hiid ever before seen the per.sun who presented the che.ine, hut thought he was humliar with him. The clerk who paid the clieqiie .saw nothing to distinguish the siirnuture from the ordinary signature of the plaintilf. and liesides, Willie, 111 his e.xi.niination fur tiie plain- tiff, he said that he 'li.'ence in losing the cheque, li.ad male it impossible to contradict their evidence, and it was, there- I'lre, incumbent on them to make it morally certain thuteveii if the cheijuc were in the record their evidence cuuM not he contradicted. Tills they had failed to do, though there were cir- cumstances which confirmed the parole evi- dence. Thus the pass book was .sent to plaintiff on the 2,ili .Inly, 1871, and showed a balance of only !j4.14-, wliereas, according to his pre- tension, the balance should have been SI 7:i(; . <;2; ami on the .'ird .August, l,s71, the delen- I ants wrote to him that his account was uver- drawn an.l that if there were an\ error he should let them know, when, accord in" to his pretension, there should have been a baTance of ?S1.'I.'.02 111 his favor. They also u-'ain drew attention to the .state of his account ,osit.—k l,ank is not liable to pay interest on money for whicli it has accepted and certiKed cheques. Wilson & La Banque Ville Marie, 3 L. N. 71, S. C. 1880 28. lo A'lmnce Moneij on the Sen'rifu of S/iarea in Joint .Stock Companies.~TU defen- dants held a large iiumbtr of shares jf tlie •^i|>ilal stocK of tlie iMontreal Citv Pas.H'nger Kaihvay Co. as security lor adviinces which t ley liad made to plaintitf, and had notiliod him that they were about to sell them, plaintiff being 111 default to repay the advance.s. The action was by way of injunction to pre vent the sale on the ground, inttr alia, that the bank had no pow-i- lo advance money on the security of shares in an incorporated trading companv, ly.der C. ..1 \ 10. cap. 5, .sec. 51 •-//,/,/ thkt the bank iiad the power, aii.l action dismissed P,'- o n {"'J^'""i"e J'tc'jucs earlier, 2-i L. C. J. VIII. Loans and Deposits. 25. On an indictment for making false returns —Held, that the giving of oeposit receipts, pay. able on time for money loaned, did not alter the nature ot tlie transaction, auiii„„ ,o,a dn.i ,1 " ' re de >0M d.Tni,.r deiHitcur ou |,ropn..|airo ou d . '1 .,,.r »on„,. d.. ,„n c. »rti..IeB,denr,-,iet .naroha ,di«Von <^f r. (.M. oil auqui.spar la biinquo, «! U, ricu d'en rom^ ou IH coiniaiwmcnr o.«t tait dircctemeiit en tav..ur d. lii ban,,m.au I MudMl'etrp en faveur di. dernio. dV ™i .„r ou I)ropr„.ta.re d,. ces articles, deiuv.e, et riiarcl an .:le ' I't si le dcr.MiT d(tenti,ur do tel revu oVntroi„-,t oil commissem,M,t e.-t I'agent du proprL-iairo des an cle" den e,... et marchandisos y montioiii,e.H dans le s,' s dii WC.ai-.tlps Statut- K.fon.lu.. de In ci-devant ITovitie u (;ana,la rcproduit dans I'anncxo A du prmmt ai^o lequel relanv. nicnt 4 cMte sinhilicatlon s'aupli ,„."«. X ouies les l'r,nnic,!» du Canada) alur> la ban, i" s"ra nvosti.de .ous l.s droits et titles de lear p • Jriotaire soJHt il son droit do se les fair., roiroct'der ai*^la 'do te en garantie do laqu..llo la ban,,ue les posstdo est payee pourvu toujours que la banque ne ^urra acqu/rV ou posseder aucun rp^u dVntrepot ou oonnaissomint pour s;arantir le pa enient d'aucun billet, efiet de conmiroe on dotte, k i.:„ins que ce biMet ou cet e«bt do o .nimerc^ u at ete iieEDCie, ou que cetto dette n'ait etd contrac-ee 4 lepoqne de son acquisition par la banquo ou avec 1 eu elite que ce re?., d' .•epoi ou ce comiaisstm ent sera.t traiLsporte i la banque, m»is ce billet, cot . mlt de commeice ou cette dette pourront etro renmivelei ou I ^poquu de leurs paiemeuts pourront etre proro«eoB sans afl-ecter ceite Kurantie. Et lors de I'expCdit.oii de quelques elTets dPuites ot marchandlses poui lowuels In banque possede un n.fu d'eutropoteiiepomro remeftre ce r^u et rccevoir en I'ohange un connalfsemen ; oS lors do la nSception de queHiut.. articles, denni™ et marchandises pour le.squels ell« possMe un connalsst nu-nt elle poiirra ivmettrHoe connaisaemeiit, ommaKasii.1^ ce.H articles, den rees et mar jliandises et y prond re un r cii d'ontrepot ou les cxpedier en tout ou eu ra. tie et en prendre un autre connB:s8ement. o, 43 Vio, cap, ai Si quelque personne donnant un reou d'entrenflt on un connaissement est enxageo dans la prole.ssion oomtne son Industrie oste.-.sible de gardien do c.iur, de ch«u ier nr.y,"„^l'„°H" '''', ^^'"'' ?." "" ?*u"^.« '■•"'(fHsin, nieunier, r^ prletairo desclerie.nialteur, labricant de bols, prooriet lire de qua, patron de navire, ou voi.urler par t^rri ou mr eau, salear, ou erabarilleur de viande, tanneur, oommVr- 9ant de lame, ou aolie'«ur de produits agricolcs, et est cB ni(ime tenipa proprnStaire dea articles, deiireos et n •, cbaudlses mentioiinris dans tel reou d'entreuflt ,,'ii connaissement, tout te! reju d'entrepOt ou co.iuiiise, me.it etles droits et titres de la banque & tel recu ou coiinaissemont ot aux articles, denrees et marcliandis.. y inMntionne.i ^oront .»u»d yaildea et efrectini i.ue n loi pr.iprietaire et la personne donna. a tel ruci: il'entrerint ou oonnaiaseinent «taie.it deux personncs distlncte>,lb. • The liank shall not make loans or gr mt discounts on the security of its own stock, but slinirh ive a privilme'i lien lor any overdui' debt on the »i.ure8 and uiiiu dividends ot tlie debtor,! hereof, and may decline to a lo™ any traii.h;r ol tin. shares of such (febtor until such debt IS paid, and il such debt Is not paid when dii» the bank may ..iojl such siuiro., allei iioliee has been aiveii lo the holder tlieie.il of the iiitenti.ni of th» bank lo sell the same, by iiiaili i5«uoli notice in the I'ost odice to I he last known address of ouch holder, at least thirty davs I I'ill 103 BANKS. BAR. 104 V ! 2J But m a subsequent case arisimr out of sunilar transactions— //eW, that (l,e b.uik lia,l not the power to lend money on tlie j-eciintv of Rliares of the capital stobiv of incorporated companies, and especially since the anlending Act C. U Vic. cap. 45, .sec. 2, which struck out the word.s " the shares of the capital stock Of any other bank,'"* which made it clear that the power to lend on the stock of other banks aid not and was not intemled to include the stock ot joint stock trading companies, Bank of Montreal & Geddcs, 3 L. N. 14t), S. C. 1880. XI. R1G11T.S OF WITH Regard to Deposits. 30. Action for $700, amount of a cheque pre- sented by plaintift, and which the bank refused to pay, allejring no funds. It appeared there were funds sullicient nominally to the credit of the drawer, but the liank held the drawer's note tprastill larf,'eramourt payable on demaiid.and. the drawer s credit not bein;; very jjood, thought It prudent to hold on to the depo-it— y/eW, that a plea ot want of privily of contract would not iiold, but as a matter of tact the drawer under the circumstances had no funds in the bank and the bank were perfectly justified in relusinc payment of the clieque. Marler v. Mol,ons im ' * ^^ ^" ^- ''■ 2»^' »• C- XII. Transfer of Shares. 31. J. L. made in tiivor of his son, a boy of about seven years of a<;e, a document purport- ing to lie a transfer of ten shares of bunk stock • tH-docntuent, which was leKiilarlv entere,! on' tlie bank ,s books, was in substance as follows • ibis indenture made the 7th of June, 1875' between J. L. of the first part, and J. L in' trust tor his son P. L. of the second part, and thebnion iJank of the third part, wilne.s.seth that tor value received the party of the fir.st part doth by these presents sell and assi">--y of come 1 1 fn Vr ** ^'*''"*" "''''' "« i' ''"f« »o Civ 1 Co 'et V'"'^'''°" ?•"'■'• ^"•'^^ '^'' ""^ 37 i. S C ' 877 "^""' " -^^«*"«' ^ ^■^■^' BIDDING-,Sfee SALE. I. Ar.RKE.MKNT NOT TO BID AT Jl'DIOIAL SaLK -NOT Ntcl;.S.AKn.Y ILLEGAL, See SALE. * t>TOrrHling Q. B., 21 L.C.J. 332, & 1 L. N. 40 for pr,.m.,t.ng =k.l, m ^ho v,,,-, of an,,, „nd of "hone a,T5 VM i; 107 BILLS OF EXCHANGE, &c. BILAN. I. Effect of Filing, see CAPIAS. BILL OF LADING-;S'ee CARRIERS. BILL or PARTICULARS. I. To BE PILED IN Election Cases. See ELEC TION LAW. BILLS OF EXCHANGE AND PRO MISSORY NOTES. I. Accommodation Notes. II. Action on. Bi/ uoti-holder, Bi) third holder. Where brought. III. Alteration of. IV. HoNs. V. \\y IJriLDiNG Societies. VI. By Corporation. VII. Bv Insolvent in Pav.ment op Com- position. '-U.M- VIII. Bv Married Women. IX. Bv Municipal Corporations, A. LlIKyUES. XI. Consideration. Illegal. Want oj. XII. Discharge of Endorser. Alll. JliNDORSATION. XIV. Evidence of Endorser. Yvr n^^ "^ ""' ""^^^^ OF Insolvency vVriv /^''•'^' ''° OBTAIN COMPOSITION. AVil. Liability on. For forged drafts. Of_ Agent, see AGENCY. Of Drawee. NERSIlip'"'""'* "'^''"' ■^'**<'^«^«''». ««e PART XVIII. Nature op. XIX. Negotiable Instruments. XX I LEADING Denial of Signature. AAl. Prescription OF. ^^}n Pkesentation for Payment. v^vlrf'* / "y^^'fi on demand. AAIIl. Promissory Notes. What are. XXIV. Proof of Signature. SOLVENCY."""' *"' '" Insolvency, see IN- y Yvfi ^p^^'"'^^" 7 ^Jaker by mistake. AXVII. Right of Action on. XXVIII. Signed in Ignorance f, morf T.: vN IS DUE, see ACTION EN repetition. A.i )A. Stamps. -vXX. Warranty of. I. Accommodation Notes. BILLS OF EXCHANGE, &c. 108 intereHtcl with plaintiff' in certain real estate trunKacfonH. unj that plaintiff- knew ?|,at t^ e note was an accon,.»o.luti„n note-)/,/ , /at i-nn n 'W^'' ^''"'""" "^""^ "'«t '1 ^ wa an II. Action on. 37. The holder of two overdue notes against J^-.Jiy non-holder.~Kn action lonnded on a pronnsHory note not filed will |,e dis, issed Hudon^G,rouard 21 L. C. J. 15, Q. B 1875. I,v„;,i '" ""''''"■'■ '^"^•^ action wa8brouK/,t hy an endor.-er of a pron)iHsory note wiio had <)iHcounted ,t to compel the make" to f Vrnish a ijmttam:e ., the plainliff", who alleged (fear of trouhle. or pay the amount. Plea, .hat the no?e no rigJit ot action as guarantee or snrciv for the W'n.entof the nole.Nvhich heing a negoHab e "igm St. Hyaeinthe, were sued in Montreal ni. notes dated at St. Hyacinthe, where he je? was contracted, but payable in Mont ea l-iS ^etl:i^l!^i.ii:t&^^ 43. The iS^o'Lk^-iu^^-^t the country ,n blank, tor goods sold tSv a conin.ercial traveller, but tilled up and made payable in Montreal, is in Montreal r^,!:. iTl c. mr'' ' ^- ^- ^""* "i L. cT 44. Action in Quebec on note made in On- ^o^d ' "'^r;,^'«° defendant was ^erZi-HeM ^md. Cuddy V. Cassid;,, 2 L. N. 346, S.%. III. Alteration of. 36. Action on a note made by defendant to he order of another, and endorsed by that oth ? toplamt.ff. Plea that defendant hid received no consideration, but had given the note for (Iip acewnmodatiou of iLe endorsee, who was «ere that at the time of the en lie, ent fi ^^otern question was dated 5th Marohri8??!a;d the latter to be ii.^emnded : I '^Vhwfhrf'""*'^.. ?«■»'"»' payment ; 2. When tlie rtpht„.. i '" '".s"'''! for the insolvent 3. When the dPhfnr.,^"°'T,^' bankrupt or effect his'dlJoharKe wUhln a cJ "f^"*^" '""'^^'f «» debt become, pay«*blebT.t.|xrT,"io-,'\"n; ^•''™ '"e term wUl.uut regard to thedelav ^iv„n k '.V"-' ""pulaled tbe debtor Without tbe°Xent%.«^}Ii™ S?ety! V^f.',?, IE, &c. 108 109 BILLS OF EXCHANGE, &o. it wus Nubseqnently Rltercd lo !)tl, April, 1877, wi hout the ftr,owk.,i.P of tlie respon.C.nt. Til; judgment w.,H„„HniM.ouHly nonfir,,,,.,!. La n,mqne Vdk Marie v. Primeau, Q. U. 18,S0 IV. BoNs. 4(i. An netion on an unstamped /(om will l,e dismissed witli costs, even nlthoiij.|, tlie delen- . ant ha8 not sppciaily piea.l.d tlial the l,on was not 8tampe^antlin v. .S7. Pierre, 10 U L. oz, o. (j. ia7y. IX. By Municipal Corporation. 57. Where a contestation arose on the de oarationofa tiers saisi as to the validity ot a pn.inis.sory note which the tiers saisi, a municipal corporation, urged that it liad given in settlement— //eW. that as the note was not given to raise money but to pav a debt, and a.s it had passed into the hands o"f a third party, and ulaintiff was not in a position to offer It back, that the claim of defendant was discharged and plaintiff could not recover 2I. T li!l''t\sn"'''"P''^'^y "^ ^''« ^'*''- 58. But in another case in which a municipal corporation liad allowed judgment to be taken exparte on a promis.sory note signed bv its Mayor and Secretary-Treasurer and then' ap- pealed on the ground that the note was null lor want of authorization in the siTnerg, th" appeal was dismissed on the grouniT that the notebeiiig apparently regular, and the appel- lan having failed to object to the watVt of authority m the Court below, could not object ml Ul BILLS OF EXCIIANGK, &o. 10 iff "'i H?'Tn"\^ "/' ^'-""('""n & Couture, V. ■ !,'•, '^"' '^ ^ ''■ N. MO, Q. H. Ih7!l. :fi«/i;Viri::5!t&'.ou!^:^r^'iv'w:'^''/- iJ;i2,8. C. 1878. X. Cheques, see HANKS, Lmbimty ok. .hO. Ill an uction on a clit>(iuoMii(l to liavp Uon ^Hl( that t he cheque was not DreseiitpiJ a,„l pro(, »»led^,ne,.t o a pur! cluseofgoods made by defendant from plal - in in J ? "' '^i '"« ^''^ '"«»' v^" t ^tock of one R . vance,! K. , that it was to lie returned to him out admUt n±°!^'^.rf[^^^.t>^"""^- l^^ e. ?; ■ '^f""'"'!-' ''P'"y to the maker and first fn.lor.ero a note without the consent of the ''econd endorHerihe holder's recourse a^ains? Niich second endorser is lost hr\L^^l G,.n,>^2l Ij^C.J 9G.S.C.l87"Ht"ritv. Tt was renewed by an. ..her ,„,te without the del ndant's mors,, ,,..nt,UKl,nade by R, payable JS;; note ke, i':\,"'^^''"'' "' ^ivinj; up the first sev.'n,l/ "'^''f |w«^esHion, and IJ. made cmed'r'ir''''"" account of it which wee L'lve In *'*' f'*'"'"' "•'''' »^'"cl' l"»'l been older or he is not ; I cannot iiuite make out .e firsrnry^rr *^'""""- '"■ l '-^ '-« '-•. e "„ tlie first note before or after maturitv • but it i« "•"nrntenal to the result, in ei her ca-e e l,as goal fa til, before maturity, he j;ave delav in i.e maker, wliich was nrejudicial^o the r^hs wil liL ;''"'''T' ^^V '^'''^- '«"'■'• ""^v have ;' ;,';,", <^"''^pe for Ins son-in-law in Jan. ornotendorsin-torhim in April The facta tteuT:! iT' IV ""%''''^ ;aiiis| th.' HiirdicK oluiun-'olvcMtHrm which ha.1 .ntm-d ii.io a con.poHition or thirty-five centH in the dollar llieoot.momtionwaH carried out hy the notes c^idorHedliy t_|,e , efendants hein^ deliver.Hl to the «HH,.rnee for the henefit of the partien «..„. cerne< , hut the bank not havinj? filed a claim in time their claim wa« included in the iiuteH given olvin', tI' "' ""■ '■"'"r"' *^''° ^^"'^ "1^'' in- solvent, rhey now sought to get the henelit of the endorsement ;>ro <,j«^ on the noteH of the endormT. The defendant.s pleade.l (hat there was m, hen de droit between them and plaintiff, md that their endorseinent was onlv in liivor of Mie en.iorHer wl,o had no claim-//./,/, that ihr hank was entit (.1 to recover.* Jiank o/ Mont- real V. McLachlan, ;{ L. N. 2,11, S. C. \m XIV. Evidence of Eni)or,sek. (57. The evidence of an endorser of a note in admiH,siMetoprovtihat.iieHif-i,ature of another 1879 Townships Bank, 1 L. N. 23!,', Q. JJ. XV. Given on the verge of Inbolvenot. 68. Claim on a note made by the insolvent in favor of her brother seven days before she was put into insolvency. The claimant prove,! con- eideratioi. given for the note, namely rfrouds sold — /i«w, that as the note was given under sus- picious circumstances the contestation would be t::r^ri^:^^:^: Oaron^Glo,e,. XVI. Given to obtain Composition. 69. A note given to a creditor to induce him m'*^".*I ■"' '=0'" position, or a note given in renewal 01 such note, is null, und the nullTty mav be pleaded by the maker to an action by the rcl?877 """''' V. Senez, 21 L. C 729o! 70. And a note given either by the insolvent or by a creditor to in.h.ce the payee to consent to the inso vent's discharge is null. DecelUs v. Berlrand, 21 L. C. J. 291, S. C. R. 1877. BILLS OF EXCHANGE, &o. 114 retired from the colieme before the matter was iitcide, — //^/,/, ibiit he was MevertheJesH liable. tohmli-.m V. Smilh, 2 L. N. 102, 8. C. 1874 72. For For;,,'d JhaJIx.-TUe appellants, at J^iieliec, nmde a dnul upon their branch ut Montreal lor $25. without advice to the brancli ol the fact. The holder altered the amount of tiie draft to $o,000, an.l dejM.sifed it to his own oreiiit in Ins banking account with respondents. llesfMiiK ents presented it without tleluv, and it was piii.i i.yji.e branch at Montreal" without olyection. I he resoondents then paid part of tlie proceeds to the deposit -. Six .lays alter, wards aopelhtnts discovei. the fraud and ,le. manded back the amount ol the forgery— //e/t/ that they cuM i, ,t recover. Unhn'B.ink of J-"iBer Canada A Ontario Bank, 2 I.. N. 132 7.i. 01 Ih-aicce—X lirm in Montreal drew on aiirm in loronto on the faith of a tele.'ram trom the drawees that they might do so in order to retire a previous draft coming due. The plainliflH discounted it, the lirsi draft was retired and the drawees tlien refused to accept -//«/■'>'l<■';s.Nl n,..,, tlu. n..te s,n.,i ,,p,M^ with «. n j ne HiKn«tnr,.s of re.,„„de,„, aM,l'.h..y h..|i.we | ' p.rson who ww,te thepnuine s,«,,a,nr. r e t es,,nm,.re,.n,.,rs..,f„,.onthen.,te,n.p,eH! Mom. N„r .. ol then. spok.. Iro.n kiiowle,|,Ie of • ,7;.''''''';''.', r ',''':';'"'^'''''«-//'''''. ''.at l,v arn cles -'.MO and 2;M1 V C, K„^UhU mien ot evi,l .„ce ■•<■ ""; « ... .tpply to pron,.s.orv not..s, „cc, d! .K to .1.0 state of the Knt'lish law in IHI'J „ IMS particnhvr. as to pi-oofol -.,,tin«H hy com- p»nson, the law ir. Kn^Han,! .s .....Terino an ....,.or a,.tcl.an,e Hince IMO. „y Lor.Vli , J" an.H (,,,ninon I,aw an.l Procrdnre Act 17 lowH --"(,o,npariHonoradiHput.-.| writin.rwitli "nv nn^ p,,ved to the m/t.s.uctio,. ..V/e ,l'"<«o I. I)..f.','nnin.., n.av heprove.l hv witnesHes "M,i Mich wntin«s a,.,l the e'vi,le,K.e o^witZes '■'■sp..ct,„. ,he Ha,..e ,„ay he s.thn.itte, the <'<;Nrt a.„r jury as evidence of the Ken, i, e ,. « ul thewritini; i. d smite " Tl,,,. Y ;vas.ie,ini,ef>setti..,r'::.-the' e' i;:rr Luckennore. in IS.it;. 5 A. an.i K. R. 70."" i';:;; •'";'«".'^'"» ■•"''-'« ct evidence I, com ! p-vrison ol signatures mwkI con(irn.e;i the court heing e.,u.vlly .iivide.l -The ,,r cip . w s roc,.>.M„.,.d also, n_the Privy Council i . t e c a e XXIII. Promis.sory Notks. seSt,?^lZ;;:l-!^,i^zt^i£S^^ iti inos^'t'LT^n" """""'y ne«otialde"no, : pee .r . . kI "'*'" '^ ""' compelled to tfive n.o.,t wl.icl, the iiosso", r 0^ ?l o rtJ., '/ "eknowTe.lK. dicatpd tlie payment wli.f.?t.?.o' V}'" •''"'''' ^p "o '"- "Mist be mndeatt Ip'.^^ iVpr^ .^f''""." ''I'''';'fl'^tl.in(?, P»ymput must be marin n. .rf i , ?," *" """"'" <=»>'<>■■< akniw,, roHldp'^„cToT,ViVornl„r'=?K""<'' "<" "«''"K dfatl., such presemmp t camm'; hf '** business, or of liis of biisine«« wh..-,. o.a . ■""^?'=* or office or usual iiIbrb accep,a^co,wU«e^l;^^ml7arrd'.%.'^'U'8c:c? '^ "^ ,,(• iT, • ,„ , '" ' "".' »^ I'uncil in t le case W> 'n 7- ^'l""" ,('0 Moore, P. C. lUp' ■.'I'-'). J hat under the^e circu..,8lanceH the ["lK">'«:..t of the Court of Review dl^„s.' he act.on (or want of proof of sig, at .re n usf be conhrn.ed, notwithstanding th, oof bv comparison was received without olecttnS the trial. r,„,,e & Ponton, Q. ]i. 18V7. XXVI. Returned to Maicer by Mistakp. 84. Pendincr a suit on a note, the note w«a uie (oturttry. Jml^.nent tor p ainiiff conflrmed Q.rRr'377,%:'B"-f87f '''■'•■ ' "• ^- ^^"'^ ^ XXVII. Right of Action on. 85. Action was to recover $225, amount of a P atr*"-' Tl e aT^ ^' d^'e.„)ant1n fator o* .^fl •• .i''^ delendant pleaded, lat. That li'e pla.nt.fl' was not holder for value but is IPf^nomof ,f.,^^„^ Insurance Co„,pany 2nd That he consideration of the note was th^ hrst annua pren,ium on a lite policy for «5 000 and that the annual Dremi„„,= 11,1 ,,1? , ' CA^ceed liiut amount, that the Vlicy offered waa at an annual premium of $315- iew" that 117 BILLS OP EXCHANflK Sec. '"'""""• P"M7., 11,.,-,. I U,„|,V|„.,.,||,v|„|i,„. 'liiil wiiH on II.,. UHual „.,•„,«,„ ,|„. „„i,„ , .■xam,„..,| „r,|..„.M,|,u,.. II.. crlumly , o.' , MHik,. .Hit, tl... ...H,. „(■ (|„. ,I..U.,„i;,„t Tu !"'"•>■• ""'"""I"!,- Th.(^.,rtc.o„l,l,,..u,li '"■'"•"l'"7' ,"l'l"li'-Ml»nttl.ul|,luin„llMl„ 'y.....|i.lm,(.(„r ll„. (H.li.y. Vlwu. r„r,iw. lli'lihl.v he |.n),lii,|i,,n of tin. ii|.i,li<..itior, (.... aUliiint., (rn,„ ..hIc,,,- for It. .l,„J. „„.Mt Co„l,rMU.,l. Aieu:a,id>;uSi Taylor, 8. C U IHM. XXIX. Stami'h. 8li. The M(a,M,,.s on u !,il| or not. inuv ,. t li.. tunc a,„l lo ,|„. amount ...|„, ,•(.,! I.y jaw aiKJ arc rcKn ar v clllii'i.,! • it,/ / ■ ' Ti I.. (J. .1 . »(i, iS (/. 1M77 ■ "■ "■ ""^"• ". ..I M , ; 1 ',""'":'' """'. '">t '">tca„. ^U i.,nl o •' '''?'"""' '" '"■ """^^'■'' >" Jl.untifl topav eoMiH „,, to pl.-a li|,.,|. 7iW,(r- . «f<. llH' P^iiilitniavinK oMaiiifil i.iil.'nirnt .... vacation iH'orc tl,,. prothnnot rv a ,r '' '' "I'l"^«.t.".. to .ho jn,l«n„„,, i\uJ,,.r,Z"' Sir .3 1''''^"'''^ ''■'''-'-' ''"^^ i»ui ic^rftiiy stamped; that ,h Htamn to tlic ur,;"lt al'ter i't" """^ 7''^ •""' '^-■' 'I- tia I hoen p accl on it by either of the partiU HU) ., . '"''f'" ('"'"■'"'''■I that tiu.alli.javi ff-aMztSe.:';^-p;::/:- 'Q:'tif'^H:^:^'f^r'-''"^^^-^-^''^'^ noAHDrNo nouHK krkpkh. ng Pfl. Where the nLMirPMwnlt..„ on the Htnmp« 1X..I to a promi-Horv nnle indieale the month tarn •'''!, ':' ""■,''">•.""" -"■'• ^-... v(n alhv -I, llm i- not, a ;rivinir ol the ,i„le of ..■Hlan,p,nj.Mv,.h,nlhemeanin,M.I iheHlaInt ..HlanartH-nnnsn.. te will he .|i«noZ ' ll^'^l'^x""^ />„j.l,..si,,r, i.i. L. It. .-iHlt's C U. 91. Motion toatlix -lampH in apiieai. After ""■ .!'.' >.'..H„f ,n the court helow,' it «■«« . ]« covcre.hhutthenotcon whirl, tl,. «c"i?,n waH iToM^-htwaH inH„|lic|e,„lv KM,! the t ITr oomrtly can,;el|e.l M,,,,,,,, .rant, I K. Ji. \\ here the Mamp. ,„, a „„„, „,^,p V tLr')/")7 "'."'*■;.""'>■•"••'"" "■••'■"en alio' ') r";r'". '"'.",'" ^''"•''''"^"""""i"'. »'« "IIo..:,(t,.afh,U! plHc the no,,. |,y ,i„|.xi„„ ,l„„i,|e ^^ im"' ^''•"■"■"'"■'i' « Q. I'- li. l'J4, C.^C. XXX. Wakhantv ok. mi b/ ml AcTjSlt''pal':d''V;:i',''"''.? °" c..n.mor,.ml paper tfvply woitl CHS 'eve n. «« Ji''" ^J"""' ''™l"lon'^ i-r,,',),,^. note, draft <),■ I i j- ,"!.?,„ I'a>»V'" "" ""y l>ronii«ory repealed and I afSii'T.'''"' "'.'" "^'^ ActMiall remain rlK^^^"acnuTrell*de?%e';a.f.\nr'"''y •"?"«• '''"' «" by It.sha I remai iva^u a„H 1 1,'^"'' Vf.""/ '^'=' repealed thorn or any .,»• them n,»^. P'^^'t'^" '"curred under and all pro»edlnK"'?„n Sfe,^'■e^,'^^;,'■H''^?"•' f<"=°^"''d. them may be coniM,„„rf „I!li " ,"1"'?'' """"i <"■ any of lawfully Tued umie? K- li^^^^/iL" l'''iL'?"'".V"-'d "tamn. !i!ihv rt^ijettieii siiai! aft.-r Ili« B„i,l payment of anvdiifv hp!-!!nv • 1 -. - day, and until tho tlilrtioVh L'"''?*,'™ »i'?'! att.^r Ili« B„i,l -t tiieir face aluo in nalmHSrn'/.""''' ''**^' ^ '■•■'*'^<"* Her Majesty for the puEflHsM of CaS^dHrT ""^"J?'" '" ior postage stamps ofllke valSe ^"""o*. or in exchange ••>. I he .leclaration M't up that at Dunham ...themonih otAiij:„.t, \Hir,, the .lelenlant "■'lMe.,,.,1 plaiMliir to .ell him a cerlai -ol" winch he ,i„ the price ,.«ree,l npon hei,'^ »I00. Ihe .lelomlant heln« the hoMer of a ;ear;;:;^i;;;ri;:''';''r''^--'''''''^"''-- • oarer lir!»l 00, olhreil the Hiime in pavment- m nlaintill relnse,! to take the note n per-' «.Hte,| ,n h,M reliisal until he ^vaH a.Hiiro.n.v nosiO • P'"'"'''f' ".'- o«"n.iK .t back, de- pos to It n court ai,i ,«„e,l for the price. Plea, hat he tranHaciion wan an e.xchanjre of the .ote for the colt (which wa.s disproved) and that there was no Kuarantee, ami that in any ^ft^eplaiiiliff could only ohtain a rescis ion of ti.e contract and recover the colt-//eW that pumtitt that It was of no value, that he would ami S;s'''lAV'"" "'^; «T""' ^^'''' '"'"««' BIRTH. ^donation:'' ""'' '■°' ''''°" Donation, EOAEuINO HOUSE KEEPER. I. Privilege of, see PRIVILEGE. II. KiGHTs OF, see HOTEL KEEPERS. . i 119 BOOKS. BOAr.D OF Df RECTORS. ■ Resolution op, I. CONTRACT.S BANKS. BREACH. BOOK DEBTS. 120 121 BOARD OF TRADE. I. Powers of. 90 Question concerning the tariff of charees tor placing timber in booms at Quebec, preplr- ing It for exportation and delivering it on board tlie vessels. The Hoard of Trade for upwards of forty years had been in the habit of hxing this tariff-i/eW, that although there was nothing legally binding abont the tariff so lixe.1, tliere was a presumption that it was fair and reasonabl_e. Stevensou &, Burstall, 8 R. L. ■lyu, l^. iJ. 18( 7. BOATS_&t' MARITIME LAW MERCHANT SHIPPING, &c. ' Rkl'om^^'^^L "^ ^"^'TOMRY AND BODILY FEAR. I. Death cau.sed by, wii.i. Support Indict- MWJT^ FOR Man.slaughtkk, See CRIMINAL BOND. I. In Appeal, see APPEAL. BONDS. I. Of Municipality are Neootiabiv e Settled by Action en Bornage A ) not by Petitory Action, see ACTION Petitory. II. Necessity of Bornaoe. 98. In an action for encroachment on a lot of and by building be^'ond the line of division f'eHyeen it and the adjoining \ot— Held, reversing thejudgmentof the Court below, that where the encroachment is clearly proved judgment may be rendered accordingly, without the necessity of a legal bornage. Levesque & McCready, 21 li. C J. 70, 1876. BREACH. I. Of Contract, see CONTRACT. NERSHIP '"'"^'^'"*""' ^""'^'^''*"^'*'^' *«« I'ART- 120 3. Act, see IN- noN. DARIES. - see MUNI- 5P0N- ollows : h, 19tli July, [reeineiit, tl'ie Lake Chaiii- tewart. haniplain. le agreement itnent certi- . The venwel ) Gaspe and ■e also pus,. lad come on >een a total le had con> the amount lat tlie £400 ances, a fair ratitiuation, )f the agree- S. C. 1880. ;0N EN S BORNAOE ACTION on a lot of of division ', reversing ; where the [ment may s necessity Uready, 21 121 BRIDGES. ee PAUT- BREAD. I. Liability of Wipe FOR.we MARRIAGE. BEIBERY. I. At Elections, see ELECTION LAW. BRIDGES. I. Taxation of. 09. Per Ouriam.-Thi^ proceeding is taken by a rate-payer of a nmnicipali.y to set aside an order or resolution of the 'Municipal Counci and an assessment n.a.le under it. The remedv .8 given by section 100 of the Municipal cX An order or resolution was passed on the «th of September, 1875, that eiehtv centj? n L 1> ,n dred dollars should be lev^d'o'tttaxa e "eal estate of the municipality, and notice was I" dressed to the petitioner on the LMh of Septem- ber to pay his tax on his share of a toll-bridl across the Richelieu, built under the provisions ofthe statute 8 Vic c. 90, and assessed under tl.e assessment roll n.ade bv the Secretary- CoZTt^ ''^''^T'' ^° "'« order of tl tonne 1. Ihe conclusion of the demand is that he order and the assessment roll, i„ so far m and T,nf r'°"'"""'' ^''''' Hside as llejah and the only question presented is whether the bridge ,fi taxable real estat*. Now, the order or resolntion of ,tse f says nothing aCt the tSou,;^ l'„"r* "r''^'^ "ot be contended that tl e tounc had not power to tax real estate- which ,8 a I that it has done by the re oh 1107; iherelore itisonly the application or exec u ion of this power by the officer who asselsed iessmeft .rt''''n'" '1"*'«"°"' ^"d ''!« assessment of t may be annulled under the 00th sec, on, m the same n.anner that a by! is tate'f t'Tl ^^'■'""--'tl-eproperty t« be r L estate, it is the assessment ro 1 that says it is taxable as such i therefore there are two ques tions • hrst, whether it is real estate ; and second natnr'rof'Mr 'T'i'^' ^« '» "^ H-t point,"^ nature of Mr Yule's estate or interest in this bridge ,s entirely distinct from the nature of the thing Itself. If Mr. Yule were merely the annual lessee the bridge itself and the "to ! house would not cease to be what tJiey are v aw whe her it he real or personal estate ,an-d sarily belong to them, irrespective of the tenure an but I?./ ' ^"'"■^^" ^""^ '"" •■''''' '■"'ate at Hil, but that proposition, I think, cannot be serious y entertained, and in rea it^ it as not axable real estate, wliich is a very different it'itn/'"''"^^ "-ake." exceptions^' g g pnwier to tax real estate. By Art. 708 of the Munbcioal Code all lands cJr rea estate are «xadle by munioipulities exc ,r tho'e men- cx"eZs'"li"' '''-' -''••- latter sectio, exenuts-l St, property belonging to He Majesyor held m trust for h.use. and pro BUOKERS. 122 perty owned by Municipal corporation- ; and o the Federal or Provincial GouMnnK.Nt. ; and hitf^r^ '•emaming question is whether this np„lf' ^'"-^ appears tome that this brid..e lonri^I ""*■"■'' .'" "" '^"J^"'^-' '''""« -H't now b;! ong to her, and never can belong to her, under he express termsof the Statute 8 Vic, c. 90 un- essshe pays for it, .nd the person she^s to pay ^ tioner" «'i',f*''""-i"'; ^ t'-"''! it-and tha? i^ Ne tier f; ,/ f T'^' "'"'■'"■•<". ^'^ U'e owner. Weither is it hel.l m trust for Her Majesty. Ihere are no trusts creates! by the Act at all. I may be said, no doubt that the bed of Tl e river belongs to Her Ma. tv. and so t o ' and heretoreit was necessary to grant leave by' br"d'eaJ.nl'>'.^''"""*'"^ "«*'^ "''""' '"'''' » ten f"tl,„ 1 '°"-''""^« ?""ot reasonably con- the J l;eca.:se Her Majesty has partH with exclusively for a tn.u. to these structures elves??'" r'"'"-- tl-e «trncliirest| ,.' tain that they are not real estate. The other IIT-^ i}ZVr'\T "^'^ "' aPPlic'^l^le to this held',,. T ''"^ '"•'1?"'""g »>•'• '"SO 01 the C^v S e £«K/,am V. Fanner, 1 L. N. 116, Q. U. 1878 11. Liability op. 107 A builder is liable for damages occa- execute the work at a season wlien it was liable to injury from that efti.«P L'/ t ■ 1 na' I ' '^- ^- ^^- 1^77. the St" PatH^kl'^H".."*^'*'."^'- '''« contractor of ine at. I'atiick s Hall and is surety for dam agesj>cca«,o,ied by the falling of tL roof of •21L.C.J. 184, &7R. L.623. Btrui^iof,'of"K bZhllt^i or builder undertakes the con- a Plan ^ ^.S^X^'^f ^^^^ fet^^S BUILDING SOCIETIES. 124 """. C''^.-'.''..- ''*'''.''' ^^."^••"'''o'- '^as Sa|:!nM..l-;,^----^X-^^^ cunn''^; '"," T- «°";'' ''■"^ that u, e" ife" (-uiituict enfeied into he was bound to follow ti.e ins ructions jriven him hy th~ iter and was no restH>nsible for thr design jranneal irmi'.d'-^""vr ,Vf."?i"i"« tl.e'plea :;as'Tot BUILDING AND JURY FUXD_&e INSOLVENCY, TO 8IIijl\ THE Claim anfadIlTl,S8umunon^h**'' '''■'::''v'''' ««''"^ from th/plan and "Deo^fll-J^t^n,^. '"'' "f"""'* ""^ " <"'»»(?» labor and^ n,.rTrllLr^:,iTToU%.ti:: r ^^-.t'T Spo'u'';;lS'tSarpCrJ.s"^'^?I'r'^'''^-^'■■^^^^^ BUILDING SOCIETIES-;^ee LOT- TERY. I. Cannot bk Compelled MINUTKS OK THE DiRKCTOR.S. Jl. Note (jiven hv. Re "„if to"" '" ^°*"'''"'' P^«^'^««^-^' WITH IV. Rights of Shareholders. V. ftri.ES OK. VI. Security for Appropriation. I. Cannot be Compelled to Show thf Minutes of the Directors. I 109 Information by a member of "La Societe „e Con8trncuon Mutuelle," a bodv politic and corporate, prayinjj that a writ 6^ mandamus should is.^.e^oul of this coi-H of the ., aid body politic and corporate, and c stodmn in possession of the books, recorls ad documents of the said corporatio.'i, enjoii ! IK him as such secretary-treasurer to sutler the complainant, a niembeT thereof, to inspect and examine the books of the said soci^v wherein are containe.l and recorde,! the rues and regulations for the ..lanagement of he said society, and the transaetions of^te direct po.ated bu Idmg society iy not entitled to eman.i an inspection of' the minutes kept by the directors of the associatich, unless there be parliamentary .iirection to t) a eil^ or he f^ow that he has an interest or under tie ntluenceot a lawful ,„otive in demand ng le 110. And even if he had, the fact of takin^' three days to consider and take advice be le complying with the demand is not a ref, sd r.Sur •/? ^'^ ™ ^"^ "'--^^^ 1^^' IL Note given by. society as collateral security for a loan is noT negotiable, and does not entitle the to security Coohy & Dominion l^ociety, 24 L. C. J, 111, Q. 3 1878 deleiidant BuUdinij <■ Vldo Art. 667. p. 287, nigest. Vol. I. 3TIES. 124 f contractor was ut tlie iron sup- tiiat miller the 1)01111(1 to follow lienrcliitotM, and sign. In appeal e plea was con- As.iocia/ion V. ^- C. J. 1, Q. B. FUXD— ^ee 5— >Sfce LOT- TO ailuv, THE .RLIAMENT WITH ts. ITION. ro Show the iber of "La elle," a lioiiv hat a writ of of this court Btar^'-treasiirer corporate, ami looks, records ration, enjoin - mrer to n'uticr eof, to inspect said society, rileil the rules ;enient of the ' of the direct r of- an iiicor- t entitled to lutes kept by tilesa there be eli'ect, or he !• is under the !c, 3 Q ne the L.R. 125 BUILDING SOCIKTIES. 111. Powers of Dominion Paki.um,;nt wi REO.\Rn TO. 112. On an inJMnciion-//,'W. that an Act assuming to provide for the liquidation of building socu'ties generally in the Province of Quebec IS ul/ra vires of the Parliament of Canada, and tlu-.-olore the Act of the Parlia- ment of Canada. 52 Vic. cap. 4s. is unconstitu- (lonal and vo,d.« McC/,n,w//wn A .S7. AunS L. C.J. 1(;2, Q. li. 18S0. IV. Rights of Shareholders. IIX A shareh.older in a biiildincr socieiv i who ha..; approved of an arraMycment with "a cieditor ot the society ulKTel.y the creditor is granted d..'lay, on condition thai the .'■ocietv shoi;l I not sell its real estate, waives tliereb'v his right to bring the r»al estate of the soeietV to sale m satislaciion of his claim a- a share- QB mi) '''''''' '■ ^"^"''"'''''' ■^^'' ^'^'- '^o^' V. Riles of. 1 ^U- "^''^ plaintiff claimed under a rale of a building Bociet^v, which had been changed and substituted prior to his becoming a member, but which It was shown was substituted by one adopted at a meeting irregularly called— i^t-W that as It was not shown that lie was aware of the new rule at the time he invested, that he would not be bound by it. IWvosf & Soviet,- Canadienne Frangnhe de Cmb-uction RRUPT PRACTICES ,'.■.■.■.■.■ COoTS . , , COTISATION '.'. COUNCIL OF THE BAR. ..'.'.'." .'.'.'" COUNSEL COUNSEL AT ENQUETE '.'.".'.'. ' '. CO UNTS COUNTY ' 'CO'UNCIL '.'.'.'.'.'.'Ml COURT HOUSE TAX. . . COURT OF REVIEW.,...;;;;;.' COURTS COURTS MARTIAL ". ; COVENANTS CREDITORS CRIMINAL CONVICTION ..'. CRIMINAL LAW CRLMINAL PROSECUTION . . . .'.'. CROPS CROWN ;.;.'.■ CROWN LANDS '.'.". CURATORSHIP CURE CURRENCY CUSTOMARY DOWER ; ..■"'; '" C USTOMS .. UTHORITIES '.; Paqe . 166 .. 174 ,. 174 . 176 . 176 . J 76 . 176 . 177 . 177 . 177 . 177 . 177 . 177 . 177 . 177 ,. 177 . 177 . 177 177 177 178 178 178 178 178 178 178 178 179 179 179 179 181 181 181 189 190 190 190 190 190 192 192 192 198 198 210 210 210 210 211 211 211 211 211 212 212 212 212 212 227 227 227 227 228 228 229 229 229 129 Page 1«6 [TING... 174 174 176 176 J76 176 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 CTIVE. 177 178 178 178 178 EXT.... 178 178 178 178 179 179 V 1 7'J 179 181 181 181 189 190 CE 190 190 190 190 192 192 ..,-..... 192 198 198 210 210 210 210 211 211 211 211 211 212 212 212 212 212 227 227 227 227 228 228 229 229 229 CADASTRE. CADASTRE. CAPIAS. 130 I. Errors of QrANirrv i.v. 1. Action arising out of an error in the cadastral plan of the plaintiffs seigniory, bv which the property of defendant witiiin" the seigniory was said to contain 335 arpent.s, 8 perches, inrtead of 1081 arpeiits, 36 perches The action was for $1,59.20, for five years arrears of rent in the excess or difference, and for which JefendMnt had Ijeen paying nothinc Plea, that nlainliils could not cfaim rent for more land than was set down in the cadastre, which coi,stituted a final title hrtwecn the' purties— y/eW, that under 29 k 30 Vic. cap. .30, sec. 2", the plaintiff was entitled to rent for the •Any reiiiiif.iir'' whose namoshall have bppn inscribed ™ the sdiertulo us holdiiiK an extent of liind less than tliat wliicn he ncfunlly pos.sesse.s >hall neveitlielcss be bound to pay the rcilc (or tlie whole extent of land winch lie iios>es?e.« ; and the seiRninr, after he has cansed a survey to be made establisliiiiij the extent of the land in qne.stion. mav claim from the nnxitain- jjaymentof then/,/, lue on such land, at the rate tlxd for that part thereof which has been set down in the In like manner any niisifiiin- whose name shall have been entered on the Schedule for an extent of laud greatrrthan that which he actually holds may, after ho shall have estabii^iedbv survey the real extent of the land in question, claim from the seignior a reduction of I'b < f'y'"'"*"""* '" "'« extent of land so established. The errors of omission or comrai-sion mentioned in the preceding section may he corrected or rectihed with the consent of the -eiKuior and tlie,',-)i,i/.,;,v without Its being necessary to have recour.se to a survey. lb., DKPOSrr OF liAILW.VV I'LAXS. If after the closing of the cada.stral plan of any local- ity any land la t:ikeii for the line of a railway through and across the lots shown upon such plan, and designated in the book of reference thereof, the railway company 1.S bound to deposit iu the ofHoo of the Comniissioner of trown Lands a plan showing the land taken for the line ; and if the Comniissioner of Crown Lands finds such plan correct he may amend the cadastral plan by causing the land taken for the railway to be in<,rh,l iii rddiH"or'v'°4Vvic"c'a^.."r'"*'' '"' "^ '=^'"''^"'^ ">'=" c„?i There 18 given to the land in each locality forming such line of railway a number to be its designation under the provisions of art. 216S of the Civil Code, and the lot 80 formed le entered in the book of reference in co'ifornuty with art. 216rof the Civil Code. 3. 1 lie land taken from each lot for such line of rail- way, on such amendment being made, is detached from and ceases to form part of such lot. SL'BDiyiSIOX.S. 4. As soon as any subdivision, plan or rediviMon Bcoompanied with a book of reference, shall be deposited with liini, the registrar shall note in the index to im- mcveables, under the number of the original lot or of 10 subdivision or rediyision the fact that such lot has been subdivided or redlvided in whole or in part, as the case may be. 5. Whenever a subdivision or a redivision has been made the particular number and designation given to each lot, upon the plan and in the book of reference of such subdjvis on or redivision, are the true description of sue 1 Bubdivision lots respectively, which is .sufficient as l>, o','!!?"? ?,""=";?''."* whatever ; and tlie provisions of art. J168 of the Civil Code shall apply to the lots of such subdivision or redivision. When a part only of any original lot is subdivided, or when a part only of any lot in a subdivision is redivided, the portion which remainsundivided is sufficiently designated by calling it the undivided residue of such original lot or of such lot in a subdivision. „ 'i-,T''e <-o.mml8sioner of Crown Lands may cause to be published in the (JiiePec Ufflcial Gazette the book of mnron.-p ^^f my svibdivision or redivision, with the .same eflectas Is g!veD to the publication ot the book of refer- ence of a locality by sec, 8 of the Statute 32 Vic. cap. whole amount of land, but that he should have had a sijrvey made establishing the extent of the land before bringing the action, and as that was not done the action would tail. Debelle- ■(t'r^^tP"''^' 2 I^. N. 115 & 23 L. C. J. 314, o. C 1879. 2. And held, also, that notice of such survey should have been given to the censitaire, the orily evidence of which was a bailiirs return. \vljicii wasmsullicient. lb. CAHIEIi DES CHAKGES. I. CONNKCTEI) WITH Jl-DICI.VL Sale, See SALE JlDICIAL. CALLS. I. Action- for, see COMPANIK.S. P \ \ I k' '""''"' ""^ Si-'n-icmuKii FOK, see COM- CAXADA GAZETTE— .S-fv OFFI- CIAL GAZETTE. CANDIDATES. I. At E1.ECT10X.S. .se« ELECTIOX LAW. CAXVASSEKS. I. Pav.mext OF Travelmn-o Expenses AT Ei.ECTio.vs, see ELECTION LAW. OP CAPIAS. I. Absenx'e OF Defe.ndaxt. II. Affidavit. III. After Judgment. IV. Against I.vsoi.vext. V. Against Minor. VI. Alias Writs of, see PROCEDUKE Alias Writs. VII. Amend.mext of Process. VIII. Appeal from Jldg.ment on. IX. Bail. X Burden of Proof in Casss of. XI. By Foreig.s'ers. XII. Declaration 0; ■■> iiandonment. XIII. Effect of Filing Bilax. XIV. Execution of, while Appeal Pend- ing. XV. Grounds of. XVI. Intent to Defraud. XVII. Jurisdiction in Cases com.mencid BY. XVIII. Petition to Quash. XIX. Secretion. XX. Sureties. Liability of. XXI. Waiver of Da.mages for False Arrest, see DAMAGES. 131 CAPIAS. CAPIAP. 132 I. Absexce ot Defendant. 3. The pretensions of a (leten(Jnnt wlio, after lieing arrested under a capias, leaves the conn try, and refuses to ajipear tor exaniinalion, will not he (avoraMy regarded hy the court. Mnhrns Bank v. Cumpbell, 21 L. C. J. 280, S. C 18T I II. Affidavit ron. 4. Where an atKdavit for capias ad res. ^et up that " tlie deiK.nenf is informed and believes tliat the defendant is aliout to secrete ses biens- mn,l,l,-s d effelK >nobilier.s"~nehl, bad, and aiso l(,r rci stating the grounds of belief.* ^l",'/o,ve and say —That f D the.-nuldefendaiil, is [.er-onally iiideljted to .aid plaii.'- till ill a sum e.xcecdiiig lorly (hillars currency, to wit lu th;. qim of — dollars beine as Tehl)"^ ('"-'•'■ »'«'« succmrti,, tlu- ilnf,., place and cmi^e of riiatthis U- hue. Hotte v. Cunis, 1 £ N 5:>. & 22 L. ."..I :u, S.C. 1877. U. But where the affidavit has di'^appeared froi , the record and cannot b.^ found, ^uid the plain- tiff lits taken no mean-; of r-placiii" it, the c«;)?«s cannot be inaintancd. .dihough the con- testation appears unfoi;,ide.l. and i.ssst be rejected. lb. 10. And where the coniestad.jn con.-ists of vague and general allegations of irregularity witliout specifying any particular irregularity! ii will lie dismi,s,sed. lb. ^ 11. The defendant petition-d to quash the capias. One of the grouiiii.<: was that tlie affidavit wa.s sworn before a peiMon whose rii'ht to receive it did not apt)ear. It was si.'tTed simply " commiissioner," witli,jut stating'' at length that he was a commissioner to receive affidavits for the court— //cW, limt this was not an adequate reason. The court knows its own officers, and the affidavit in .jue.-ti.iii was sworn before one of them. Joseph . . Donovan, o. C. 1877. 12. But an affidavit for capias is defective winch uses the words " peut etre privf. de son recoiirs," instead of the word.s '•/))■/;•«■«," etc., and which omits to depo.«e as to the intent to de- fraud. Foj-dv. L^ger, 21 L. C. J. 191, S. C. 1877. 13. And an affi.lavit for capias is defective which deposes that the departure of the defend- ant " may'' deprive the plaintiff of his recourse instetidof .-aying "will" deprive, etc., as laid down in the Code of Procedure. Stevenson v iM,e,tson> 21 L. C, J. 102, S. C. 1877; 798 C L . 1 . 14. And an affidavit fLir capias which depo.ses in the alternative timl the defendant has secreted, or made away with, or is about im- mediately to .secrete oi- make awav with his property, etc., is delective. MeMa.^ter v Iioliettson, 21 L. C. J. 101 , S. C. Ls?". 15. But it is sufficient t.i state the anioiint in " cfollars without any qiialilkation os to a jiarticular currency, //rt// y. Zeniirhon, 4 Q. L. H. 208, .S. C. 1.M78. 10. And where the initial only < chri'tian name was given, tiiis"\ no ground for a petition to quash. 17. But where the affidavit di. personal liability, or the ■ 'ire <-., was set aside, '[h. 18. The allegation in ar. •Mda, that deponent hath been n • .led by a pers<,i, designated that the defender had come to Montreal to attend the meet,'. <,i tin' Graphic Co., and that the said def('ii.':inl iv-'V. .-.'out to goto New Vork," was held i is'i ient in law to ju-^iify the belief that the 1 ■ .. i'lnt was d. 'endant's Id to Ije it .'liow a the cajiias for ca|)ias 133 CAPIAS. CAPIAS. ■'11 -^ -ii\ II 'tlv. riii'.i not llJ :.0 J',;( lose « .'lileges tliat ■j!!t to fi.tvete Ik plaintift', it of the person at I'll, nor the believing tlie urrie, 1 £. N. ippeareiifroi.i 111 the piain- icii'L' it, (lie oiigh the- iion- id n;l\tlt be I COILiistS of irregularity, irregularity, ) quash the aN that the whose right was signed stating at ■r to receive at this was •t knows its uestidii was i . Donovan, is defective !/■/('»Mti/ne, h Li, \j, o . Ziil ) loTy. _ 19. And so, al.so, un affidavit for capias alleg- ing t Hit the deponent is informe,! that the defendant IS secreting, or is about to secrete, his property, is insufficient, if he does not i^ive his reasons for swearing so, or mention the names of the persons trom whom he received tlie inlorni- ation, in order to place the defendant in a posi- tion to contrudict tliem if he can do so. Mul- larky & PhaneuJ, !> K. L. 529, S. C. 1879 20. An affidavit for capias, after establishing the existence of a debt, continued as follows :- Que ledepomnt est inform^ d'une mani&re croyable, a toute rainon de troire, el emit vmiemtnt dans son dme et conscience que le dit dejendew- dejait a cache et soustrait, cache et soustrait et est stir le point de cacher et sovstrairc ses btens, deltes et effets dans la vue etui-ec I intention dejrauderses creanciers en general et le demandeur en particulier."— .tfeW, that It was necessary to state the grounds 9, s" c R ilVg ^'■"^'"" ^ ^««'«"<^' « Q- i^- «• 21. Defendant petitioned to be liberated on the ground that in thealHdavit the words, " and that such departure will deprive the plaintiff of his recourse against the defendant" were oiiiitled-i/e^:n, S. C. 1871). '' iiS. Tlie (K'lciKJiint, wlio was ciipin.Mpil, in now niovins un.ior art. S2o C. U. 1'., furnisln,,,. mire les bclure tin- prctliotiotai'v. Un.ler that arti<;le lie ha- oIHt,.,! hail, Init the hitter seems to have lialte.l. It i.s o(.p,)se,l hv phiintitf on t^he >;rouii,l that, uihler nee. 12V of tlie Insolvent Act Hinse repeale.l, art. H2.J C. C. I' i- reiK-aled. We liol, the contrary. Mr.Ua^ter et ul. v. Hub- ertson, 1 L.xV. 77, S. C. li. 1«7>S. ;it;. A lieCenilanl arre.sle(i on uapian, who has given l)ail iiiuier art. 825 C. C, i.iav he ordered to surrender himself into the hands of tiie shenll of the district witiiin one month from the service uiKin jiiiii or on his sureties of tiie Judj,'moiit and order, and in default proceedings may be taken to enforce the judgment. Bro:<- seau V. Creoier, 2 L. N. 40J, S. U. 11. 1879. X. BuHDEN OF Proof in Cases of. 37. Capias issued upon the affidavit ofplain- tiHs bookkeeper, who alleged that the delend- ants were indebted to plaintirts in a sum of »14,504, money feloniously stolen by defendants Iron, piaintitf; that defendants had shortly after the larceny been arrested and committed for trial i that they had presented an application lor Habeas Corpus to the Queen's Uencli, which CAPIAS. Xlir. Effect OF FiuNo BiLAK. 136 had been dismis.sed ; that subsequently the Crown had given a consent for the admission 01 tlie detendant to bail, and an order was beinir prepared for their '-'.eration— //c/rf, in review? reversing the judgment of (irst instance, tiiat in such case the burden was on tiie defendants to disprove liie allegations of the affidavit. Mv- ^"^iee& Jones, 3 L. N. 371,& loll. L. 683, 40. Ihe niere f line of the statement, in con- formitvwith article 7(14 o( the CMe of Prnce- tlure, does not entitle a partv arreste.1 un.ier a cap>a, ad respondendum to be released t 'oi custoily, such statement being subject to ullack art "vtV'fl .f/"" "/'""" ^;^^^y- '"entioned in S C l'87ti ''■ ^"''^'''^^ ^- ^■J-2C, XIV. Execution of while Appeal Pendino. 41. The respondents were bail to the sherifl for a person arrested on capias, and who neglecta to give special bail, according to e terms ot the bond. The capias having Xeen le^ dared good and valid, .lefendaiU appealed, but |;ave security (or costs, only consenling that the judgment should, in the meanti,„e, be executed in terms ot art. 1121 of the Cod. Jf Prooed le DelembHiit having failed to pay the debt ac io^ a« taken on the bond to' the slierif!-7yew" liat, under the circumstances, tiie appeal did not suspend the proceedings against \U bail. Lajoie & Mullin et al, 21 1. C. J. 59, Q B. XV. Grounds of. XI. By Foreigners. 38. A capias by one alien .against anotiier will not lie, both parlies beingonlv temporarily in tins Province, and the alleged dJbt arisi,,- out of a contract entered into in a foreign coifntrv where the allegation in the affidavit upon whicii the capias issued alleges the immediate depart- ure ot defendant with mt.Mil to.lclraud. Ventini V. \^ardji lioome v. iVard, 2 L. N. 133, & 23 L. C. J. 2(J7, S. C. 1879. XII. Declaration of Abandonment. .39. A defendant arrested on capias, who has given special bail, is not bound to file a state- ment and make the declaration mentioned in art. 7t)(J of the Co< l.elievi.,2 was timf" 1^ j .• ", '''''''''"" ""' residence /« LTv^vi sv!^/,, ''T ""' ^"^'^^ ^"'^ po.;anly in Montr 'itf^li^i;"'''^ "■'."■ ately to Vern.ont, wi e,eeiesTU "."."''■ an, ,„s,uic.ency „,M,e afH.lavi" ^ on" f f must bo a r'-lt to fr , l^ wT ' '"" ^''*"''' =.,„„ If •' . n'"' 01 arrest wliatcvcr? i. pjaintiin, contract; p:i;;.?!;.:t'i^rs..S'" ot hast Geortria. Frank 11,, ,... potbecHte,i has depreciat^ tilt. '"'"''"''■'■" render bis debt ,„„f^r'^''"'^*^ .'" ^alue, so as to tin,eofsaie 1"// /'■^°'Jv'°,"'' ""*" "^ 'he probable caus? for £'0;,.;. ibaf 'n'"/""^ was secretin^ bi« ,.r^„ . ? ",^' ueli'nilant deCraudine Ha Pre,?,> P''"^ ^°\ "'^ P'"-p"'e of toti.eSiand ianl!' ^'''' "^«^i'^'^^c<' was a nativrof P '"^"f • '"' ■ '■'e insurance agent the fleason of navigation, beinir witbm.t »!,<. [iiaiiititt, an,| caniaa oiiuhI,,,.! //. , • ^'"' ^'W/a«. 5 Q. J. ^Rr^cts "c'lSTif '"'"""'• ^^ 4 tt.-fc%a &„i, 2 d N 2?!^'?; „ 'I'j'; J"W banlv would not boi.l lb ^^ "'^ cv-he^SdM::r,;r'ixr^j^^tfr' i2trr^c,£;nni:^;;:r^!«''S^ irtlr^arT'Sr'^-^ '"^ .'^ purpose 'orvP*-,?; ° "^" * ^"^'^ exhibition, all ids interests being t. ! I^HI 189 CAPIAS. CAPIAS. IK) |i * m ill Montreal— //(!/<7, that the on|iias imiH Uo qimshcd,^ Ambrui- & Maltcml, 2 L N. 1.5!), 5:i. Whore there wiin evidence Hi •'.■.Ur diiiit hiiiiHcIl Imd siiiil tliat the |iiiuii(,iil uii 'ii' go U< the devil (riitc le do. ir in,ai;>l\ ■I'lhr sejairi' muTf) \\\M he woiiM no e. ,„,,^ him ii ceTil, Imt w.mld ff^ off I.. MMiiliina, itri>l hJH fiiiMJly would (iillow,— //.'■(, rever-in^ the judKiiient of the judjre c 7//0, that this wan quite Hiillioient to Huppori the atli davit, ami the petition to iiuanh should have heeii diHiiiissed. Vujtiih V. Jiclle/iuinenr, 2 L. N. lit!, S. C. 11. 18i 1^ 51. ThecapiaH ismied a^'aiiisl deleiidaiil on a judfrnieiit alrea'y .il.lained. The allidavil lueiely relerred to this judfjiiienl, and tlie declaration inereU' allegi'd that the an, aiiit of the judf;inent uas ^lill unpaid and ileinandiiijr a capias— //cA/, that as a capias issiiinj; alter jud'Tini'iit was ,,,.l a demand in the sense of Art. 60 C, C. P , tint only a means of prevent- ing tlie det'endiuii t'roni leaviii}.; the cuuntrv until the drill shuuld he paid, that a releieuce ^S0. -^ 0;> Aetiuiioldamagea hy plaintiir(appellaii() for malicious arrest im « capias. Appellant was a wholesale grocer in Toronto, and was leaving with Ihn hoii for the Puri.s exhiliilion. On reaching Montreal he wa.s arrested on an affidavit of one of the defendants. Appellant owed defendants some $2,000 ovi r due, which, on heing applied for in Toronto by defendants' agent then', the latter wa- 'nforme'd that it was settled, the only settlement, as it suhseqnently proved, heing a note at four inonlhs, which plahitit}' had sent to defendants at Montreal by mail. On his arrival at Montreal, une of the defendants called upon him at llie hotel where he was stopping with relerence to the amount, and plainlitf admitted that he was going m Europe, and moreover intimated that u'ntiriiis return defendants would not be paid, and lliey could get their money in the ' way ih- y could. On the other- hand, tin \vas piuof that plaintitr was still carrying on Ins business, and that he was in the habit ol crossing to Europe almost every year— Held, reversini/'the judgment of the court below*, .,\ ilie.se circiimstano's did not disclose an intent to defraud sufficient to justily a capias, and damages to the amount of $500 was awarded tShaw s the circum- stances be sucii a-i to make him ca.ugeable with in.vntto defraud. Paulet v. AiUaua, 10 R. L. J2y, & 3 L. N. 154, S. C. K. 1880. X\'n. JuKisDicTio.v I.N Cases Commenced 57. Where an action for $67 was originated in the Superior Court by capias ad res duly executed, but of which a demlemeiU was sub- seipieiitly filed by plaintilf .>n the return day— //'■/'/, that such action coiihl tH,| be then con- ' iiied before the said court Hir want of juris- iliction, and must be dismissed, saving tlie recourse of the plaintill before another court. >ir<-o(tev. l{e,,in,:r, 1 L. N. :151, A 22 L. C. J. 1.12, S. C. 187«. XVIII. I'ktitio.v TO Qlash. « a L. N. 5, & 3 L. > 'm, & 23 L. C. J. C2. 5K. Allepd diflerences between the affidavit and the decle'iHon cannot be rai.sed by the 1... .M. 132, & 2;t L. U. .1. 212, S. C. IHVX XIX. StOitETioN, see Gitot'.vn.i of. • ■''''■ J^PlPi'l'i'it 'vas arrested by a oipias issued lor lgl!»7.87, amount of ihive notes .'iven by him to plaintiir lur materials supplied lor his business as a blacksmith and carriagemaker at Vaudreuil. 1 he ground was that he had secreted his estate with intent (o defraud. The transactions between the parties began early in ilDll" .. Vil'?' ,""" ""■'■'■ "■■'" " Ji"l«M,ent (or *100 aiid $21 ol costs against the defendant, and in May, 1S77, his moveables were taken in e.xecntion under it, and a sale took place on the .tOth May, 1877, on which day the judgment wa.s a, piired by his brother, P. (}., iroi"i the hen plaintill before the sale, and tl" 'iitire -lock s„ld lor $51.31, in 60 dideivnl !>,>-,, and they were all aopiired by P. (J. IK. sold them o hi,s lather, \. G., on the 25ih October, 1877 lor 5!.ij,.il, and other consideratu.ns then staleil lw7li"T ,.'''" -T" ^'^'''"'^■- <^^" 'l'^' ''^H' Julv. V^'.' '}■■ *-'■ 'I"" <'ikii agreement with thedeleii- dant, his soil, by which the latter agieed to carry on the business as his employee, and did so, lliis agreement referre.l to a verbal a^'u..- ii.ent made between the parties on the^Stli uciober, 1877, lor Uie .same purpose, and by it AG. igreedto jmy the son, the delendant, *7b pv month lor .s.ilary of hmi.self and work- men ')n the 21st February, 187!), the defen- dant sold his real estate in the village of V audreiiil to B., notary public, reserving pCsses- sion, it he thought proper, till September next. 1 his property included the shop where the defendai.i had carried ,n his husine.ss, and winch ho .:ontinued to occupy from the sale of his moveables n. May, 1877. On the 5th March 187!) A. G. sold to B. all the ,tock- m-trade ^ ■ , moveables Ibr the siun of S,)U.39, an the urlendant was party to the wiie, re- icing his rights under a lease he had from 'the Ihe plaintills had iiu knowledge of tr iclioiis. On the contrary, there f ot ,> ,id two letters from deteiidant to l;..intills,ot dateGth February a . I 27th March, in winch he pronii.~es paymen. .f two of the notes in a tew days by collections whiel. he was about to make. Not a word was sai,. ,,f the interest of otiiers m .-tock in trade and move- HD\e>i~Held, there was the strongest presump- tion ot traud between the relatives, .fudgmeiit to nmintai.i the capias. Heney & Girard,S. Q. 00. The defendant hat! been arrested under u capias ad respoudendum, and made a cessiu Ooiwmm—v/h>ch was contested by the plaiatitf 141 CAPIAS. More (1... I,u,l,trw.„t tonntke tlu-Ho /. re (J^" avri^ti but .e only remove,! I.h ell.rtH to St «el -//«W, tluil tl.iH waH not a conc.alincnt a,>,| conu^tufoM ,lm,„i„Hed. AV,-,/e & a-X;/,' (il. Action of capittN an.l attacliM.ent before J ., lament on tin- ^ronn,! of He.^retu.,,. Ou wX nt.ton in l\w tnr.na Conrt ui the .liHtrict ot Kichelien, an,l lliat all his effects wroH^i/e !'";l<->' 'i wnt of execution in virtue of Inc |U,^'Mjer,(; ,inu on the .lav (ixe,! r the ale defen.lan,. w„l, the consent i,f several ere lit, ^ i fluniof$l,.!, and were adjii,la(,| m ij,.. tiihi.ted th.. price, $;;(0, to the landl.ird of ll„. prennsesand the balance for costs a, I e < I, i .^ of tU>> Uersmisie-H.lU, reversin:; the i ^:; u..?^"CkIl^^tS;r''^^^•- ^e^.;'':.r:;T;^,';7^;:;l:;:rdS;ar:r- norl.at;e ^iven l,v him o„ property *)■ k "Hied out, did nutl,elcM,Jtollun'.b lni;i L, app.irently was s„|,ject"to a .snbstitut . n,' wt^ |K).site,l l,y appellant m the Mechanics wo is .'""""■" """"'• '^»t ^"iMequently the were add ^"^^'"f,"' 'r^' ''" ^- A- M-I^o, " were add and shortly afterwards the money wasal! v, ..-awn lr,„n the bank by appellant re«Z"len "" '""■ ' "P°" "" '''"''Hvit made by re-pondent s aj?e': .,iing out these tiicts h.,Z fl:,r:?'::.*?.,"PP^'"' 'M^ secretion andmak^S CAPIAS. 142 away with Ins ,. '-" "'•'^'•'•'lon ana makinL' meL'VnVI"''' "^''^i''"^"""linS the false state- lenta, an,i transact.jM took place in 1«75 and thecapiasdid nut issue until June, 1877 V XX. SURETIISS I\. pioot that his absence in the States was bi f temporary, but ..evertheless- {leM.lCteien ^^rfE.Sl::^!r'' ''■•'«''' r'''^'^" y^_u. 312, s!ci878 "''*"" '• ^-^'-■'■"'■•^.'t the !'r.,vl„cL of Canada Zd'nZ l'^' ''" , *",' """»•"* " Wr -8 will UttV tim u,,; . "?"" <=il-(. lie(l,„.,s0 8HCll amount (lxr.d by tKeuK'i, ",'?:'■'''' "'"', «»»'-• "' "'e tlii« bail caniiot be rSe.1 /ri'; ".r' "' !"■' ,*''• »"' fiKlitli dav from tl..-"". H^f', r "'« "^P'ration „t tlio writ ori;ui„.,s unlcK.* To, .J , [''" ''"''"■" ■■'■ Uio gmnted up'on ^umt^a c^u^.XVn' "r,.<=;',"V,«'iP^«»»'y ' -;o- «.ve special bail as condition To any 1. r M.curity whatever, or pay the deb . T i « ""'I JMd-m.nt was renderei by wl icb „ -i' it ;th:;'ti::r,3"ha:-:;t:rt,«;;^l the detendanls were liable etc "n... '"","'"' <")'~/ldU, that as the secnrity ' ven Tn a ^I ;-.ly .covered costs, that the ^udl e t .'/aln' tu;'nn«the capias was ex..cl.lal,|e,^ ' tl de^ g-<- l^aii tor him to the shenll -bnt 1 e . er thep,ii;.;t;i:.y;,t;;rieS^nT'^;:d^.:^ It was brou^rlu. Jl.cv ulso p eadei the ml, K oii'ncy of the ath lav t-an,| tlu l'c i, ■. I gHtion Theplainti.NtnadVsttciaY: ;.;';^^^^ lieji.d^nnent apimst H. was rendere,J afte a (-.otial service of process on the d'lW , m,t I'ir Vr'"r''*f'P'"' ^^^^ "^^en by H on the Uliot April, returnable on the 2.,d of 4ay hill was not retnrne.i up to the llib,, Vi^' . -Uter the instit.uion of t^.e JresentV.clioo .S 1 1 ,"' ".' •^^"•'' •■'"•' plttiiitiH''* gave U. notice at on the tir-t day o. the Term (lUh fu y) they would n,„ve to ,lismiss the appeal UuiJ n.en against 11. ha.i been given rti'e .;iKf Maid, lie con,litiou of the oblijiation as HUmed by the bail was that '[. a,/^n' " ''v; I.U. to the action they wou.u pay tl,' ,- ,|!! ^dd that that condition was sai^isfied b-, *dZ Imilttoanpear or to give any .ecu „v .viv.tlvtT ll.t'y ha,l nothing,' lo do with the validi y oMh; gsnient, but only with the existeSo he iebt. 1 he appeal suspendi,! the execution of the judgment; but the plaintiffs in 1^, resent mentZ'r' «''«•< i"o' to en torce that' jS ent J"'"*^'^'",^- I'x^y askcl that, °jud,'- l^t^or no judgment, the defendants n/ay 'Su.^ i!;::,^tr;!:;»;::;,!;:^'i""« - j»<'««. or pro. mmmmM nroiC|'l;'.?c"',.,''r:;':M.'"' rr' " """■"" '""^ ""tain hi, bail pursuant to art. m or art. 8a S'i' c'ic. 1'' *"'" 143 CARRIERS. CAIUUKRS. 144 be inmle to RBtisfy their olili^fulinn to the ulicritr, who hail ctiilorMed this IkhhI to I hern, anil iiiiJcHH the jiicluniPiit wax revtTNfil In appeal, or H. Iiy Home other iiieatii shown not lie ihe jdaintiHnMehtor, they niiist pay i hut in-teail of reversal, the jiitl<;ni«'nt a>;ainNl H. wan cori- firrneil in aripeul, Jiicljnnent fur plaintiffn. SmiJ/iA. Duvul, S, C. IH77. (17. The HiiretiPH of a iletetidant Hi chIoiI on a capian who have entered mlo a homl under Art. H2H ol the ('ode of Procedure are lihcruted Iroin their ohliiriiiion if on the day ot ilie return ollhe writ u\ capias they deliver the defendant into the liandM of the nheritl in ternn of their liond. Auijerak Trwlel, 10 U. L. 5tj(j, Q. B. 1879. CAPITAL. I. A ND Interest not the hamEj tee 1 NTKREST . m CARE-/Sft'(? NEGLIGENCE. CARGO— ^CB AFFREIGHTMENT. CARRIAGE. I. Of Passengers, see CARRIERS, RAIL- WAYS. CARRIERS. I. Ltabii.itv of. II. ]. in the vault which belo^il "o m was strictly ,.er>onal and could m,t he interred, but that even he could not deposit ottered to accept $5 from defendlitit, he would lH-o.nden.ne.lonlvin that amount. Le, Curl ^^11. RiuHT TO Damages for Profanation CATTLE. rJ:.,^^^'"'' *""« '^"EspAss OF, see ACTION tiMULATioN or. Qui tam. CAUTIONNEMENT— 5fee SURETY- SHIP. I. En appel, see APPEAL. n. In Cases of Capias, see CAPIAS. CEMETERIES. I. Right op FABRiiiUE over, ii. Right to Damages for Profanatiok of. I- Rights op Fabrique over. da!.uI'rHP''''"."T''''°'"P'*';'«'' ""*' thedefen- dant had deposited in a vault belonging to one y-,jn the parish .lenielery of St. Hvacinthe hevrir' "^"''i''. 'Without the permission of Mie .ubnqueor ot itsolhcers, and without notice to the proper authorities. Plaintiff alleged, urther, hat by a by-law of the parish, paf,'al' U n. • ' V^IP''''^'""' "'at "O Stranger should !u.'."„^^!"^"l,"'«/""l^ i" question" until "he ami'fnlT/'- ""■" V' ^*" I"*'J ^ 'I'e Pabrique, and for this sum they prayed judgment de- fendant pleaded that t'he^ault i wShe had 78. Action against a cure for danmees for alleg.. that he resided m the parish of St. Jean Chrysostome, where he ha.1 practised as a physician since 1H.;0, and was a R^oinan Cafl c^ lie ; that he had three chiUren buried in the cenieterv of that parish, and their burial-place "arke.l by a marCle headstone on which tlfeir wit'hThe?- T' '•"'*''-'^*''' "■'"«'" ^«« one with the approbation and consent of the cur6 and wardensoftheparish. according toe. stem rs^suci"tha,";r'"'^ '"''' '*^" d"'y «°"«^°^«'"j an.) ^'« ! "" '^''""'''''•y a<'Joined the chuix;h, and had been properly enclo.se.l and protected nmi the intrusron of animals, etc. , tlfat sh ice he arriva of the defendant 'in the pa isl he pfa ntr";L°," T T'r''\ P^r«^«»tio!: again t Piaii titl , tl at he had, without proper reason u aintTtl'",^ 'T' ""•' 'ri''!" P'"-P««^ ^'l" '^-m plaintiff in his sensibilities, had a part of till thar r.T *"";"" "" "'? "''^ cemetery'^plough ! that beloie doing so he had taken awa? the tonibstone p ace3 at the head of plaL ffs o"intiff"'?rV,"';''r r'^ P'ace unk?;z, ?« pi't lUiff hat he liad ploughed over tlie "raves ■u his children and .festroyed the grasps and herbage, and had done alf this witl.out ?he aj. honzalion of the Fabrique, and again t te w II and consent of the plaintiff", and prayed for $175 damages for iti ury to his feeling and $25 a "wlu'l'"? '?";l'-'"r- ^«fe'"'"nt pleaded laiili, and or the purpose of improvine the ra"io?:;v'a"r' '"- ''"^r"« ^'" ^--^ '"- -^pi -- bation of a large number of ;he parishioners oi''li';:.r'r"'t'.i'/."?'V''? "-"?'^i.e sisifop i!i..iLi..„i r,j,„ ji^ i,jj(j p ougiiej over lots but^whicr«'^ '"i*^^" avvay^othe^r headsle 1,1 1 ' "? ^^l' as the plaintiffs, had since beeu replaced. The proof Jid not shew umlice '■h\ 147 CERTIORARI. CERTIORARI. 148 on the part of defendant— 7/e7^Z, done in jrocxl fnilh and for Hie i the cemetery, even to introdnci ploughinj; across gravef, ,|ii| profanation, as it was in tlieinte Pucli profanation existed, and t tiie action of plaintiff must be d martelliere & Seers, 8 R. L. 601, til at what was niprnvenient of ng horses and not constitnte nfion only that liat, therefore, ismissed. La- C. C. 1878. CENS ET RENTES. see SEIGNIO- I. Ranking op Claims for RIAL RIGHTS. tion arising from failure to proceed within the delay prescrihed. haviolette exp. & Trudel &. CnzdaiK, .'t J.. N. 159, S. 0. 188(». HH. Motion to quash a certiorari as having issued more than six months alter the \nd^. mentwasrendered-//eM, that the application, having been made witliin the delav, was suffi- cient. Fiset exp., 3 Q. L. R. 102, "S. C. 1877. CENSITAIRES. ^•, Error in Quantity op Land heid uv see SEIGNIORIAL RIGHTS. ""'" "^' CERTIFICATE. I. Of Bailiff, see BAILIFf\ CERTIFICATE OF BURIAL. I. Regularity op. 79. A certificate of burial wliicii does not purport to be an extract Iron, a register of burials kept by a minister or otlier^ person authorized by law to keep such register is qT 877 ^" '^''"""'' ^^ ^- ^-^^ 270. CERTIORARI. I. Co.ST'-' IN Cases of. II. Delay to Demand. III. Deposit fob, IV. Groiinds of. V. Lapse of. yi May he Quashed after Execction. VJl. Motion for. VIII. Motion to Quash. IX. Procedure in Cases of. A. Right to. XI. Right to Ori-er. XII. When Lies. I. Costs in Cases of. 80. The costs-- on a certiorari are in fhe dis- cretion of^ th^^oxxTi. Lavioletle exp. & Tnidel icCazeJais, .S L. N. 159, S. C. 1880 81. VVhere a conviction had been quashed on certiorari-ZTeW, that the prosecutor cou id not be condemned to nuv costs unless he were I ri 8G7! s.ri88i.""^'- ^''^'^"'^'"" "^^•' II. Delay to Demand. 82. On the merits of a certiorari to which tne Lrown had given its consent after the Japse of SIX months from date of conviction— Held, that the Cruwn could waive the objec- i III. Deposit for. 84. An applicant for a writ of certiorari to remove a conviction for violation of the Quebec LiceiKse Act, is reqni.ed to make the deposit provided for by Sec. 195 of that Act, before he can make the -.pplication. McOambridqe exp. & Be.i>wyers, ;U L. C. J. 181, S. G. 18V7; IV. Grounds of. 85. The affidavit for a certiorari complained tliat the magistrate issued his warrant for the arrest of petitioner urder 32 &. 38 Vic cap 31 sec. 6, without causing a copy of tlie warrant to be served at tne time of the nrreM- Held, that as the question was not raised before thn magistrate, it could not be raised bv certiorari Monii & Marion, 2 L. N. 180, S. C. 1879 ; 119 \j» Kj. r. 8(). The petitioner had been convicted of assault in carryingaway (he windowsof a house and leaving the family residing therein liable to injury from exposure, and condemned to $25 and costs, with imprisonment in the alternative, and afterwards a similar conviction in the same words the same day, with the addition that the inipnsonment was to count " from the expira- tion of another term of imprisonment which the said, etc. " was condemned fo undergo for an- otherottenceoCwhich he had thisday been found guilty, etc.— //eW, not to be two convictions tor same otlence, and certiorari quashed. Dubuc exp. & Cdy of Montreal, 2 L. N. 334, S. C. 1879. V. Lapse of. 87. An applicant for certiorari who, after the granting of his petition, allows a considerable time to elapse without faking out the writ, mav be declared to iiave forfeited his right to have 'Ji" ,."''".' .I''^"^f ■^""•"^ ^ Corporation of Quebec, 5 Q. L. R. 314, S. C. 1879. VL May be Quashed after Execution. 88. The conviction of an inferior tribunal will be quashed on certiorari, even after such conviction has been enforced and executed. Thompson erp., 5 Q. L. R. 200, S. C. 1876. VII. Motion for. n a .^""''''O"*"" ^''«s convicted under Chap. 22, t. S. L. C. sec. 3, by three magistrates at Hem- niingford, on the 29th December, 1877, on the complaint of the respondent of having, on Sun- « ay.the If.th December, in th^ Havelock church, during divine service, "resisted the said Wil- lam Stewart, churchwarden of ssiid church, by forcibly wcupying, in opposition to the direction 01 tiim, Williani Stewart, the seat «ei apa-t and reserved for the choir, when ordered and re- 149 CERTIORARI. ^eed within the p. & Trudel & I. irari as having after the judg- lie application, elav, was aufti- 2, S. C. 1877. of certiorari to of the Quehpo ke tlie deposit Act, before lie hmbridqe exp. C. 18/7: iri complained arrant for the Vic. cap. 31, f the warrant arrest — Held, 'ed before thn bv certiorari. . C.1879; 119 convicted of iw.sof a house, erein liable to enined to $25 le alternative, n in the same lition that tlie rn the expira- ent which the idergo for an- ay been found o convictions ished. Dubuc A, S. C. 1879. fho, after the considerable he writ, may •ight to have -poration of ECDTION. ior tribunal ti after such d executed. C. 1876. er Chap. 22, lien at Hem- 1877, on the ng, on Sun- ock church, e said Wil- churcli, by Jie direction ?t apart and red and re- quired so to do by the said Stewart, tlierebv (listurbinz the congregatio-i a.^senibled in .said church or the worship of Almi^htv God, con- trary to the for.,, of the statute," et'.., and con- den.ne, to pay a fine of »] and S9,('-. costx ()„ the 2,,.l: .^,,„e, 1878, he ,ipplio,i t„ the judge f,„' a writ of certiorari, the noti.'e having been served on the magistrates o„ th. 21st June, and the di.s ance to the Cmrt House being upwards 0/ thirty nil les-//.W, t|.at the delav was suffi. cient, and that the motion to auashdid not re- quire to conlain reasons, the "inscription bein.' 62 S.'c. 1878 '' ^P-^'^itewart, h L. C f. VIII. Motion to Quash. | nf^^:,r'' motion to quash is necessary in cases ?876 "*""'■ ^^""^P""' "^P' 5 Q- J^- R. 200, CHALLEXGE. "Pi .' Ji 150 IX. Proceditke in Cases of. hvl\J^"r^^"^'"'"'''' '','■'"" '^ C'^'"^'iction under a Dye-law of a municipal corporation concernins school taxes-Z/.M, that Z proceed nJs^ to e taT.i'i'Jrt?";T'' " ^"--'"'i^". '' i" "-"'fietent uv-la«s of the municipal authorities that the provisions of ,he law have not been observed and that there has been illegalitvin "he bylaws a^id procee,iings of the municipal authorities Bandem e,p. * ne .School cLnisLTerJof iit. Jades, 7 K. L. iXi, S. C. 1876. ^ X. RtOHT TO. ihl\^t^,^^^'^i'f''T ''"'■ "^ ^^'■'' "I" certiorari on the part of a defendant, resi.iing in a neiirhbor iiig loca'itv to that wliere tlie'ju.igmenT was rerulered will be refusal if it is ti the pe Ual knowledge of the judge that ere'^ i.'" no o,M,n,,«,oners Court in the locality in which h^ 1. a h , ,1 7 '"'='^l't'«« is al.^o known to imn, although it does not appear by the conv fjl'^f'T. P''°''"««J ^^i'l' the app' cat on vhere the ']","'' ""'1''"'="^'^ '" 'hl-^iocalitv dee, dan rT^] ^^'"■\'>'-o»gl"' "or that the aetendant res'ide,! m that Ocalitv nor that Thi'r'^^'"'' 'r«'^'°"« re,Mured by Art 1188 o the Code of I^roce-lure* i.ave been observed fhihots exp. & Fauteaux,7 R. L. 430 8 C 93. But ill another ca^e hell, that a writ of eer loran supported by the onlinarv afli 1 v?t would be granted, if it appears bv the cn„v of the writ o summon- and' the copV of II e ud^- ."em rendered by the Cu,n,nis"io ,er C 7 re.i ie in the same locality, and it does not annear that tne debt was contracted in the looahrc V liej. he court was established, or that the , le- TuoT,^ '"''"' '" * "«'iKl'l«n"g hicaliiv in M. And a judgment rendere.l bv the Com- missioners Courtagain.st a defendant; res'lin.- in a neighboring locality where there is a Com- missioners Court, will be annulled, if the ^iVi". i dCi't"" "'"■■' ^'"'^'' P'-onounce, he SSngJ'V^.^l^r""''''^'^^^''^''- 9o. Biitsuchjudgment will beset aside with- out costs where t is through clerical error on y that the jurisdiction oftheoou.t.loes not appear, and where the defendant, although he d , o appear, was personally served wTth thea'tim aiKf knew of its existence. Ih. 9o. Mo certiorari lies for a defect ..ftbrm rom a conviction for an oflence within the ~-')^.o' the Summary Convictions Act W-:)A Vic. cap. ,'il), where the merits of ,he case have been tried, and the .iefeiuiaiit has not sT . 1 878." '''• '^°- "'"'■' "''P ' ' ^- ^"^^ ^'^^' XI. Right to Order. 97. Application by a prisoner committed for tiia for a writ of certiorari, on the around that as the alleged offence »-as committed in the United States, the court here had no jurisdiction! I nsoner was charged with inciting certa Ndiv.dua s residing in New York to the con ission Of a certain lelony, viz., to fnrge a qnan. oL.^' n *" P,°'"*S*' Htamp.s-i/eW, l,v the Qi een s Bench, that that court ha,l no r.nht to order^a cert.niri in ..chcaaes. Nar,on,Lxp: XIT. TVhen Lies, diet" fi?.Xiitl'':;u™iv'' ««/"",''<"' ''" "'•"»'''« J"!- tra.tr, and wlKvH thn.,?"V''" ™"'!: "'l'"''' coll- ect exceed twJl,\v-i;U'l;i;!.S.r„d^-S'e"f:„aSe?r 1. Tn thn 1n^^\:i.. .«.. a. . withi . In the locality of ttjoooiTt; contractoa in the loj.t^ '"/^^^ielf ^e fJr.tes'j'ab: exoesdingtrnlSaKuT 1188 C 0.1?'" * '*'"""'""' °°' 98. Where certiorai'i was brought from a court martial, and was objecte.f to on the ground of jurisdiction, it was, held that ihese courts are interior jurisdictions, and subiect to the controlling and reforming power of tie S. g!T876""'- ^'"""P">" "'^P-' ^ Q- L- li. 20o! 99. Certiorari does not lie from judgmenfs of i:^c:i.3"3ifrcn877^''''^''^''''''^'"^'''^^ CESSIO BONORUM-&.e CAPIAS. CHALLENGE. I. Right or, see CRIMINAL i^AW. ?a 151 CHURCHPIS. CHAMBERS. I. I'owKRs OF JuDOK IN, see JUDGES. CHANGE. I. Of Domicile, see DOMICILE. CHAEACTEE. I. Evidence of Chauactkr of Pi.ai.mtiff MAYl.E ADMITTED IX ACTION OF IJaMAOES FOR MALicioLfi PRosfcuTioN, see DAMAGES. CHAETEE. PANJES'^""''' ^'^°''^ Companies, «e -COM- CHAETFJi PAETY. I- EviDExoE OF, see EVIDENCE MUIHUGe'.''' ^''""'' ''" ^^GJ^NCY. DE. CHEATING— ^,.(; FEAUD. CHEQUES. BANKS."" °^ ^'^'""' *■"" ^^•'^"" '"' '"' CHILDEEN-6Ve ILLEGITIMATE CHILDEEN. I. n OF ^ UoxATioN TO, see MAUaiAGE Liability ■ W I Ft". .T!!,KrJE'i^;;:;;^:*"^^™N-i>-^- II. Di'Tv OF TO Maintain Parents. . 100. Theohligation ofcliildren to mv-Mvt nn inHigen i«r,.nt, i,s not joint, and noveikl, but each cliilii IS condemned to. contribute in nro- portwn tohis means. LeMaiM- v. L.htuuc 1 L. N. C18, & 23 L. C. J. 10, S. C. 1H78 CHOSE JUGfiE-.S'e« JUDGMENTS. I. Pleading, see PLEADING. CHUECH BVES-See CHUECHZf<:S CUEfi, TITHES. CHUECHES-S.f CHUECH TA- BEIQUES. I. Ah.'"irch and sacristy. winch had l,een dniv authorised l.y tlie Bishop of tlie diocc,«e and the parishioners. Defendant mt only the property of persons professing the Koman Catholic religion was liabfe to such as. W'ssment ; that the property ofcorporatioas and iZ . n."?." •^'^'"P»"'e«. fjuch as the defcdanls, «as not thus liable and the (act that all the ^hareholders were Roman Catholics would not mike It so.as ,t was the juridical personality of the corporation which was to be coiisiilerd and not the personality of the shareliolders-7/e/,/ niaintain.nir the action f.,r the amount claimed: Les Curvet. Varguillier. ,te LUEuvre et Fabrque CHUECH FABEIQUES. I. Action Against. II. Action by. III. Assessments by. IV. Decree for Erection or Churches V. JintiMENT OF Commissioners. xAt S"«'^kssion of Property hy. VJl. Powers of. Vin. Rights and Powers of Cire. I. Action aoain.st. 102. On the 1st November, 1874, at a meeting of theMarguilliersdii «ancde l'(Euvreet Fabrf- que de Notre Du.ne de la Victoire it was re solved to purchase for the p,,rpoHes of a ceme- tery -rtaui land belonging to the Fabrique de M. -Joseph de Levis, for the sum of i-'GOO. Con- lormably to this resolution a deed of nurchx«e tlip 103. And A«W, „,.„, ,,,„„ „, allejration tl.nt the plai„tiff.s are j.aro/.w/,.^,; e< J-nfhoK...., an ,t ,^ necessary to alle.-e t a tl ev tl.einselves are Roman Catliolice. lb. II. Action by. 104 On action by the plaintiflH for a 8,nn d„e under a parochial a.-"an Catho- lic dio''e.seo( St. liyacinthe to make an acteof coUzaUon and re}i.nUUon, and t rais^ ,l"/ amount asse.s.sed upon the proprietors of i.t o^eables situated in the parish oftlie imn ac . ate Conception of St. Ours, profes.si,,.- the cliurd, saJrif.v m:>'~ '"""'/■»ve taken possession of a {^{oi^iri hi5''^''?j '-^» <''^fi"''p:^ portion or r , , " Xip' ■ 1 "'''■h"'""''"''"" <■■■"■" " ma In tl., „„ 1 wiioip o( tli0 8aidiis..es.smpnt, accord. reimd , Um ,^^ «"i<"' "•''y l>av.. b." „ 8utsc?i, i r;," ^'-^^f .'i'' .■•'payment of sucli volunt»r? i. iJur n7,,Mr si tl^^s ..,''''''" "'h"?''''" P^'vided for. tlie same n ,,, « a ,H m>.,. <=.)mmissloner,s sliall adopt autlmrity r l^ee, l?J .H ''"1 "".""' '"'r" ""'^ '''<" "■""« Puriio"(sM,mnu7?^ in similar cas.'.s and for similar tlie linM le Vl an hlvo .^ ''"'"^'■"'" "'■•' *■''""">' "'''''I'"' niission,T.navwhPn«J„,. .>""■'""« .*."•"• «• '^'''« «°"'- rtoso, auihS 3'"^^'" "'"y "=""''id«r it expedient to f^sxS SHE?---— - coniniissioiiirs til, ,selv?« 'j T' ""-' """" P'"*"" "■■' "'« wliich mnv 1 „J „A . • ''• *'>'ery act nC Bssessmenl a"'liorii,7fn rsf .« ."^tt r^' eIn.rcliHardons In ntlice valid and iSvctTa\ i^^\( ?> "'V {;""""""'i"i'crs, sliall be as each of sug|"per"on^' bceu prepared by nji u„d ^,„i ""..v, iriij^iuii, as aiiiieaiei jv t im ordinance ol the sai.i con.missio lers p o iue^^ 1 bat by acte passed before notary in J , e hH the plaintiffs, for the purposes of a rt ■ cl, ,rch S;U.e7m"'u"';' ''"^ "'^■^•^'•' pan:i,, a'Tt laise iiie amount necessarv tor that i,i,i-.„>^o conformably to law, had, ifnd 1 1 e a ,'e d auth.,rity asse.ssed the inuiioveables sit ate H,^ ^aid parish to the amount of |40,;i78.52 an I ad dis ribu.ed that sum amon. tb'e real aZ ,e- \^iL^J\?rT' f '""•'"v<'"''leH situated ?n re Lr ,^ T '"•"'.^■■■'^'■'f-' ^l''' I^'"ian Catholic rtlision, m proportion to the value ol their respective properties, and notified ead, to paV tlua.nount assessed against them in the coifrse of ten years, m twelve eipial instalments nav able every tenth month an,| the liisl o wh'^cf, nder heterm.. of the acte, became due tie rstoi December thon last past. That the .ieten! 'ant, who prolessed the ftoman Catl die reli gion, was assessed on iinnioveable.s v ich I e owned in the parish ,0 the amount of 26 atr he .i'.'e''' I "' ''^«^^«"""" «"'! '"■'^t.-ibn if nl alter the due observance of all the formalities required by law, w .r duly homologaf,^ b he comm.ssioners. with an ainen.lmeiu to heWlect ac'/should'l': " "m"'^ '° '"' •■'^'^^"' '^'"'"^ " act should be payable in ei-ht vears instead of an was indebted to the ilnintiflin the m, of for y^''^ '"" f^^ '"■" i">talnieiits over lue oy the diocesan b s hon of St Hv,.,.i„ , 1 r.»iJ,cl,.i acu„„„ic,l i,i,„ fo L° S™ till ",'■;' """V'' i" »" <•" P>'»l. ™n 0". V. Jl-DGMEKT OF CoM.MlSSIONEBS. noli!; '/'''r-'"'!'-''"'Tl"''"'e commissioners can- not be declared null bv the Circuit Court n..» pica inastunch as the-judpnent wou! be^ ul! on its (ace, nor can it be attaekeet tlie recjiiireiiients of 2'J Vio - ■) 'j'i nf,;.'' "■'"'<^"',''"^. "ecesHity of n.akin>r proof Sa C 1879'" ^'""^ '■• ^'^^'"'-S Q- L. R. VII. Powers op. 110. It is not iipoessary thnt a Fahriqne be Bpe.= ,ally authorized by a .„eeti„K ,:alle,l for that purpose ,n onier to sue in recovery of an as,-esM„ei,t .iiie, when it refers merely to acts of a. ininistratioM and receij.t, as they "are sutK- Cient y aiithorized by the hi^v' \i..lr.^ Fahrlp>e I \ TV' ^ ^- ^- K- ;^^7, C. C. 1879. ill. And the commissioners tor the erection civile of parishes may order the raisin- of a VIII. II1GHT.S AVD Powers of Cure. 112. The plaintiff, cure of tlie pari,«h of St. hr,n!'ST •^'''""' '" '''*• County of Shetford, bro.yhtact.on against tlie defendant, alleging It he was indebted to him in the sum ol°$4^ being lor two years spiritual and temporal care and services rendered by the plaii till in hi. capacity of cure to thedef^ndant L\ hs family, i'sir'n ^""m" Ca'liolics, residing i„ tie pai ish ; that lurther the defendant was a farmer and owed tithes to tiie cure, to the extent of two dollars a year, under an onlinance of his eminence, the Bishop of St. Hvacinthe naiu'lV n'r"* T'""? "'" ""^ i"l"»hitants of the' parish. Defendant, by his plea, denied that l.e was a Roman Catholic; that the plai, titl- had ever rendered any spiritual services to h , Beltortamilv.and ifhehad, that he had no rig It by law o be paid for sucii services, because tfiey could not be valued in money At he enquete the plaintiff proved that he iiad served as the cure of that parish for more than two years; that the defendant had been married twenty-six years previously at the Roman Catholic church, and that he had continued to practice the Roman Catholic religion until hs aepar ure for the States, thirteen yea ,s p e- Lmte,i States, two years before, lie and his family had observed their religious duty at he paintitt's church Defendant made no prcKjf of bi the plaintifl that the defendant Ud raised any crops from which tithes would be due, so tZt CIVIL STATUS. 156 hen estion xvas purely and simply as to the la ility ot; the defendant to a direct payment o the euro for spiritual services.-ZyeW, that tlie services of a cure of a parish are of a nature par ly spiritual and partly temporal ; that they could be appreciated in money, and that further. asm taking the care an,l Charge of a parish the cure 18 bound to certain obligations towards he parisiiioners, and they are reciprocally bound to and liable for his maintenance and Mipport, and therefore the plaintitt was entitled to recover the amount claimed on a quantum- uf-'"5/ ^""•<«'"J«c/ie & Mailloux, 10 R. L. lOo, Mag. Ct. 1879. CHURCH OF SCOTLAND. I. C0N,STITI'TI0NAI,ITY OF AcT OF Un1o\ See ACTS OF PARLIAMENT. ^^"^^.««e CHURCH PEVi^S. I. Right to. . li;{. The right to a seat in a parish church >« not a right of a public nature, but arises Irom a private agreement between the i.iirish- loner and the Falirique. RohiUard & l'.v Cur6 & MurpmlUers of Bcauhanmis, 8 R. L. (i3, y. D. 1870. CIRCUIT COURT. I. Appkal FB0.M, ae.e APPEAL II. Jt-RiHuicTioN- OF, sfe JURISDICTION. VIEVV '' ^^ Jl'ogmknts of, see RE- CITY ATTORNEY. cJr?OrItION^ ''' ''" MUNICIPAL CITY OF MONTREAL->Sfee MON- TREAL. onaoteu ^^,»f »!,"'"""'"' "' '''"'''♦•'" " '"• declared snrt corMmth.n ni' "u^^!"^',^ "^ '•'"''"«' ^y "ny person or twmvt ree«?,hi**l':«'',''r'"'"''''* ""^"^ "action r,.r. . ' "' '"^ ^"t flri't above c tod to aiiv iwrann Si^ iir^"--. ^"J^'^a^ CIVIL STATUS. I. Proof of, see ACTION en PATERsiTf:. 114. In an action for an account of a con- tinueil community commenced between the grandniother of plaintifl and her secoml hus- twiid, the defendant, it was necessary lor the pliimtifl to prove both her own status, sht being de.^cended from the marrin>'e of her grandmother with her husbami ami tiie com- munity which existed between the grandmother, both marriages having taken nlace under ..ir- cuuistauueB in which there wiis no clergyraea 157 CLERGYMEN. JNICIPAL ATERNITK. & Jordan. 10 R. L 401, (]«;&'• ^""'"^ CLAIMS, li ^U,iZ'"'''T''' *« INSOLVENCY CLERGY. TioiTXvvr AoL^c v-.^' '^'•""'*''«' -* ELEC I- Liability ok. CLERGYMEN. family registers and pape/i J""'^,,?? I"ov«,i oither by witnesses. 61 C. '''*'"-" "^ "'"er wriiings or by ACf «KsPKcr,.va t„k n.o.sTKns or civ,, status. Q 41. Vic. cap. 8. ex]]^&s;L'"/,^l>';fi«">^^^^^^^ more easy and and buria.. Her M*, ftv bv^a,?.''',.".^ 'l^"''' •"^^""Sb Jjayi'ru1vtt^'n.:ftr .Xr^ "^ V'^" «'»'- birth, one lor actfl of marrwp niT' "ir? *'"■ »«8 <" buriH, ; or into t«o v™Smes^o,,J n,'''* ''''^'l'"'' "•» of fflarriage, and tbe olber "r ict^ of m.^, ? "l ^K^'' ""dof 01 the duplicate registers mavl«.,H"' J^"H' volume* be prepared with nrlntlJ^ • " ' 't'lor blank, cir mav for acts of birtli anrt A» 1 , " """ ''o'u me la used contain in "uchcoTseci iv^-^rdT'tl.e'f '^''* r" ""u! birth, and the last part in the ««n,^ forms (or acts of the lorms for acts ol mar.iage! "-onsecutive order ^;l'"^^^^^lZ^::^tS:^^^'f^r 7« or the tlie same, a bo.lv slmii i.o„ i "''"' '^^'^ amendlnir burial to 'a school of" 'neufcifie or" /"""'/«'' "elore an act of death shall be inscribe fh'.i'" * University, e^ect as an ai.t - b*^te?d'r.;'U^i^iy-CTer delkv^o\^h;Tda;,1o''"«'l^'™''^''?"•'« "o-nd within a or other priest o?^mi.?st*^PK ''t""'V'« '««'"•. cnrat* which tlfe deceased behn^L* "''!!"'' ""''e religion to death to be ins™?bed it fh^li"'"' '<','=a"re8uch\c" of death, the names H,M.„o. *"">' contain the dai of the Of the' detS a'nd me^i^on o1 ir'"^ "' occnpatioi'l body was found or o( 1,7. iZtit„.Vi '''!!'"' ^'"'■■e the bnl^in^^^^^^^ blank pages shall tC p?^"^ «r.',"/' f^'^'" .""mberof for theactsofdcatl. mentioned In the u-n ";•= ^"'"""' 5. Every oinl8.si >n hv \T > 'be two laflt sections. cause an LtTftkl^ to'V.'^rsc'rlbKal,'';; "•'"""'">■ '« of'i^h du';'irc'?rt*e"':!'?,^«U'i?" ^'»«'"'«ttheend each churol!: m,,"»r;~'i' —"•«!*"^™ -°f c'"' statu, i", I nmnay by theperro„=e"niiaed't, otner^.e,i^„„,^^^^-. COLLATERAL SECURITY. 158 ce«'H^tsft'lt'"«--neniiiH,,o. wl.ich he I vel tit, ' '•■'"■" '" '''ri""-i-l, in gation one Si.t i^ ",;",[;:." '" "'^" o-'.-o- 'i« relation, i™o e wf. V?''''' l'''''^'' ^^'"' f"*ve no it ter<.onr«e p //';?' "'"^ '"'"'"'J not point .iV™rHi ,*-"'■''''■■'*' <'<^trines,nn,i ''ad c'harac , He 'an ftlii't in"' T, ""r'^'"' "^ anienable like otl" s ^ e'dWI Th " ",'" CLERK OF THE CROWN. I. Commission of. coljluv c^T on,."cr"^ !^^«, P— ^^viie^e^'^SaSa^s :'c::^;,,rr''-''{- ofhoe, ,;on(er,s on eacli of 11.*^ *^ '" *"»''' other mav .,"S ri^'T'^^ ill.MiM he .si, ne,| ,'.."' **"•' '''"^''n'-'ts Httixe.,hesiSure t ""'"""••'"-" who CLERKS. VANT."'*"''"' "*'' *'" MASTER AND SER- COERCIVE IMPRISONMENT- See IMPRISONMENT.^ COHAKITATION. I. Effect of, see POSSESSION. COLLATERAL RELATIONS^ «ee DAMAGlI^ "" ^'•*" Offknoes, COLLATERAL SECURITY. Li banks" °" ^^^'"^^ »'" S^'^^'^ ««'-" AS, i. What is. 159 COMMERCIAL MATTERS. claim since paid hy tlic firm to wliiuh he be- longed at that time and whicii he represented. Plea that tlie ilraf't was given in part settlement of an old balaiicediie I'roni a previous insolvency —Held, that as plaintiff liaii failed to prove tha"t the draft in question had been given strictly as collateral security, as alleged, that the action must he dismissed, Amos v. lUoss, 2 L. N. J2, S. C. 1879. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS. I. Sale by, see SALE. ■ COLLISION— ,See MARITIME LAW. COLLOCATION. ■,rl\.9Xr Claims in Insolvency, see INSOL- VENCY. .r,Ji.u L''*''"'^'* Report of Distriuution, see DISTKIBUTION. COLONS. I. Privileges of, see EXECUTION ex- emptions. COLLUSION. I. Evidence of, see INSOLVENCY. COMMISSIONERS. 160 COMMERCIAL MATTERS. I. LeGISI.>'^IVE AVTHORITY LATIVE A THORITY. II. VVha"' are. in, see LEGIS- 119. A music teaclier who buys pieces of music and re-sells them to his pupils at a profit does not thereby become a trader. Monmn & Leboutillier, 5 Q. L. R. 212, S. C. 1879, 120. Action to recover a horse which liad been pace.i with defendant to pasture, but whicli had been taken out of defendant's charge and stolen, hy false representations todefendanf, on the partot the person taking it away, that lie was in the employ of plaintitT, and had authority to do so— /M/, not to be a commer- cial matter so as to admit evidence either of the « de toute cotlsation impos^o lur Im- tl^,v.«o^iH, "^ iin.'Psli!,P sacristio, r^re.i.yt^re ou cime- «tl^'.',';!.'.'<."'={^.,^« ■=."'""".';" ,»'• '« J'!«em.nt^ do cn„. tWnieut"'' i'Krtu- docs aii Baroaa dMnregS"- i FOR Capias, 161 COMMON SCHOOLS. COMMJSSIOJ^ERS. sJhouLS.""'"" ^'""°'-'' '"' COMMON HOAI^CoSiSl^te -« TURXPIKE COMMISSIONflR,^ COULTS. COMMISSION ROGATOIIiE~^,e PKOCEDURE. COMMITMEXT_S«e C KRTIOR 4RI CUxWiCTIOxY. * I. Bad. II. liKr.VhARlTY OF. I. Bad. not state tl>at ,t \v , ^^i&'T ""'}' ?'" T II. Regularity of. face a Wft !- •• ^'""'"^^ "'"■-' «''0w on its i";hiK,;;:!:::;-^-'^;-'"eproc..i.re quashed. Ca,Z/.„. i'.,%"li:'ll- ^^^^'^^'^^^^ COMMON SCHOOLS. I.iL?:r^--SS^--0.FHSF0H V. Powers of Commis.s,„nkrs Vrri "t -'■"''""W' COMMI.SSIONERS. VIII. .Secretary Treasurer's Account. I. APP0INTME.VT of COMMISSIONERS. «over„o? „a,i the",'?.,.!':,*; ii.,t"-""r'i COMMON SCHOOLS. 1(52 128. Election of a cotnnion school coinmia that the election ha.l heen clo.se,! heCole t p exp.ratio,. ot an hour from the open,, " ,' e •nt.etM,(. as provided hy Art. 310 ult eSln,, 'i |)al CudO to the support ot a school umJer ight therehy to place on the board ot' con. msmsm 11. Assessments for. the other hand, the provisions oflawvhiPh siiail be made withm three montiis rivh ,"i. "■as not done here) d,d not call Zn he com nn.ssioners to treat tins as an exi.S valuation edirom. i],i„ „- an important point Buf the Court was not called upon now .0 decide ,t as upon another point the preten, h. ot tl e the ra,e,s shall be ti.xed between the T«t' otlav p:ii:J^u£c'f'?'''f"''''''p-^-''--!^ Pioviaea publ c notice be given, at lea»e»tdeclar<5 slouers see C. S. L. C^^v■U,t^■ZlT """"""■ fl 163 COMMON SCHOOLS. rpn.aine.1 ..npai.l, tlie Hecretarv-lreasiirer was to leave (KTsunally or at JoM.ici;., with the dehlor, a Htale.i.ent an.l ,letMai„l of imvtnent- an, para,.ra,,;.. 14 Hai.i t|,at mo ,lenw.,!ao pav'nre van „eoe..a,-y where the debtor l.ve, %m the hjn, H of the inunicipahty ; but nuch per- notice with.MU ,le,na,>,l. The .,„|y evi,le,.ce o„ tlie .su bject of „„t ,.;e. was that < f Mr.(Joto that e ^uo notice. Whe.iier he „ue notice m- sec 84, or nn,ler C. II ot the ^t Vic, intioduc- ng he provisionsof C 24 Cons. Stat, there w s nothwif, to show. In two of tlie c.ises the fZinl^ T ^""""^'•y ''.V warrant un.ler the 1 amlottheMayor; in the other case there was a toninion .sumnion.H to answer ; but in all three the principle was the same. The sum was ot ex gible unless tiiese formalities were compile,! with. In the cases of Iloi-an an,l DeUsle. case ot IJar.salou the action ,liNn.isHe.l, with cu.^t8 ,„ all Sr/md CommLmomrs of Uoclidaga v. Barsalou el al., S. C. 1879 1.^1. Since the Seigniorial Act of 18,54 the seigneurs are no longer bound to pay into the scho , fund the tortieth r«,uired by the Con. Stat. Low. Can, cap. lo, .sec. 77 ; and a sei-nenr wlio has unduly pai.l such tax may recover the amount from the M.cco.ssors of the commission- ers to whom he pa„l it. Le, Rei-erendes Dames JMi,;„Hses irsulinesde Trois liivlercx y, . Ley STn2;r^?ss7^ '-^ '^^ ^-'^- ^ And— Held, also, that the school tax is not an annual rent, aii,l is not subject to the same pre- scription as annual rent. 10. . I;i2. On a certiorari from a judgment of infer- nn',^yH",""r"""i"=' s«''0"' t"^L^s-//eW, that, notwithstanding the apparent regularity of all he proceciings subsequent to tlie conviction, ntn I!m '"*■ V""!'''," ''"*■« the right to enquir^ into and control the proof m order to determine It the by law impo.sing the as.se,ssment has been pas.sed af;cor,iing to law. Daudelin Erp. v A-,Td ^""'''i^^^ioners of St. Jude's, 7 K. L. 4*>'>, o. Kj. lo7t>. VM And if the by-law is tainted with ille>'a- Jity the assessment is not due, and the ratepaxers "^.■'"t'ldelaullifthevdonotpay. lb! 1.^4. And the action lor such assessment must be directed against the defendant, either us pro- prietor or pos,cHl on tuis and on other alleged inlormahties-/y«M, that as thev had u.^ed a wrong name, the plaintiff must have judgment, bo „uo..l, and Bliali gcmraUy Vhv« ili«-8ttme powers COMMON SCHOOLS. I6i Iiut as he Jiad failed to establish the principal legations o his action, the judgment 3 be for one shilling damages and one shilliu" costs. Jian-ene& School Uommh.lonersofSt Columban, 7 It. L. l85, C. C. 1875. IV. JfRISDIOTION OF COMMISSIONERS. m. Action lor 14.29, two years' school taxes nixjsed on immoveable property, possessed by the defendant within the limits of the parish of St. Louis de Ijonsecours, as fixed by prochmia- l.on ordering the civil erection of that pari, h, »h ch ^yas situated partly i„ the district of St! lie, MM i"',"^ f;»"'y '" tl'eilistrictof Kiche- ( u. 1 he delendants' property was situate,! in the ol.l limits of the parisirof St. Ji.le's n, tl " county of St. Ilyiicinthe, from which that p rt I the new parish which was situate,! u, tlie county and ilisinct of St. Hyacinthe was taken, efen.lants pleaded by .lechnaiory excep io 1 -trictTf "» "l "l"' ""';'" "■ '^" «''■"" "' ' di.«trict of Kicbelien; thatmey ha,! not been personally serve.! there, an,! .because of ac on ,li,! not arise tliere-/M;, that the liniit.s o a a >^'cm\ provision of law, and as by sees, 28 A 2J of cap. 0, of the Con. Stats, of Lower Una, la.- the limits of a school mnnicipaky ae ul.jea to the organization of municipali^ tl N orodinary purpo.ses, unless, un,ler section •iO, the 1 niit,s of the municipality ha,l been cliange, by the Government for ^clioo pur poses, that thejuris,!icti„n of he plaintills did not exten,! to the defeii,lants' prop.Mtv. an,! tl e exception must be mainlaine,!! Sc/wo Comnl- K:n7Ca(^'So!^^""^^"''"'-^'^^«^^-'^ V. POWER.S OF Commissioners. 137. Action for an a,ssssment for school axes, ,1. support of the only school existing in the municipa iiy „, which the immoveable Ibr wb.ch the defemlant was assesstni was situated Ihe defendant refuse,! to pay on the .'round that he was a Roman CatluVl,^, and tl'e'sc-lioj |.n.l n.i,i.icti,Bnrle6 of yuebao -..J Mo'7r^i^ „r .. « -J^n ipiliiiii ligfiilil 1<55 COMMON SCHOOLS. in question wiiH con.Iuete.l conlrarv tn »l,„ pnn,„poH of that cluir.li-//«w ^'... I, school .listrict in whicl. the Mmionu' , "'. " Wo.-« are l{o,na„ CaU.o cm hec , , ' '" '■ avrnri;^,S' 'V" '--'-i-s schools. M;m, vvt;,^u • A'™;;''n^ "• r'"'' VI. PowEKs OF Superintendent. Ie«n«, having L,„;;;.M'i?'^S,;f^- cornniiR-iioncrsdeciilcl r,, J, "' .".""'""' "'« place, un,l passe | a r h , " ' ' '" "'.'' "'''"« 8uperinfeM,le,.t, a?,,! o L ii J HT^r ,1 ^" "" ing the p,.eHuie,',t ^iiu:t:^H:::.:T'r a.iotlier house, which was d.mV a^ '", ^">' taken rmnuluU pmceX-s fo^'l.p^'''''"'*' *"^ tl'swp :i tuS '[lllu;::"^ the judgment of puhi.cins.ruc^io :a ue f.'i;i!v^'«'''';''''''S°'' theconslru.tioM ofa new uflln;^ ''*''/'' "'''^'r tlie old one, or o„ any Xoe v ,^ i thes.teof fchools. 6 Q. L. It. 322. & 1 it B^^:ti^ re^n.li'n;!;S;j,.S^:5^''-— erofthe of tl.e 8ite ... q. esiion ,; ,' '5 '""? '" P"««eH,sion the.n to co,,l?nn \ e-'Vai;'-!;;?""'''''^*'"'- '■"■oh as theylm,! no tide '^.h'' ''"'"' '""''■ that they w,..-e exno''"";e the.scho^L.,,,isiir«-«;M?,'r^^ "H'st he di,s,nissed mdMt,' ^'"''"'eaot.on :;;_^..Hnis,ratio;:'il:t,°'--~^of COMPANIES, JOINT STOCK COIiPuiiATIONS. I. Action i.y Foreign Company J i ^^""''".^^L'u.scr.ption.'^ IV UmI':" ' ^"««'''«'o~. *« BK0KER8. V Declaration of V i Y^""-'"' "*• t>*'FICER.S. Lvsoi'vEi-Cv!'''"" "'' «"^"^«0I.I,EB3 AFTKR SHECriON OK liuoK "of "'^'' '" ^^'-'-"^^ ^''- A. i'oWEK.S OF. To carry on Jiusineaa. jo pay Interest, /omant iVarehouse Receipts Al. Power of pHovia.i.ri iNCoKPORATIi. ""^'-"LUL LeuISLATURE TO ^_^^. 6HAKE.S. ^^Xm. SCKUOATION OF IN RI0HT8 OF Promq- XIV. Subscription. XV. Service of. XVI. Winding up. tw»y>^e«, eucl. .u.aeve^ t/me t „ff'''r''''' "» ru-Mm I iTMdaleM or erroneous i d .""'j '"'^^KUliir, lilugal, agrec.>n.m., eaiereU into W? w'e.T.^ho?,?""""^ ,'"»''''' |«r.aM. witlircitTeiiceio'u.,^.^'''*''"™'" '"• ""y o e" I'Hi I ; but thu superiiii "iOnnt » iin"*'* "' """"ie or in SUCH Miii btlore Imvi i ,a2' *, ' " ""' *"'"'• l"to any >«r, f,l u,jou [,„.,u by a ffifo-t t '** «"l^'"'"'«nd,;„t auU •b«iiiiini |,ois„n or at tli,. i, ,i ."'.".Prisons mentioned noUj.e,auU »ucu delay eVlredf.?,,,'"'"'-"'''.^''' »' «"cli trustueo liatunot in.siuuu.'il fh,. " » """""iesioiara or dm,lsbaa do BO. T le 'unerl o.,"f''""' ""•■ xup-^rinteu' tn.sti.e8 t . vvarci • judicial m.'^,''""""'^*"o»ir« or them ,f i„ ,, ;s caiio, . "' »""'=««1"'g», aaJ advance -I'le Suiif , virtue 01 tbib ''"IUIU!^siil»i^i■ li eaaurer may , ■lu \ ic. cap. )fi>, »ec. ao. ^ "'' "upeiiuteudeut. y i; Ml 167 COMPANIES, JOINT STOCK. COMPANIES, JOINT STOCK. 168 1. Action iiv Fokkion Company. 142, Muni file Poa;-r of .(//oniw/.— Whori' an inHuriirice cdiiipuny dem rilicii itHciraH"ii body coriHJiate and politic, dulv inciirpiiratcd acconlinj,' to law, and liavinjr "its lieiid oinrc arid principal placi-of liiiHineHs in New Vurk in the Slate of New York, one of the rni'ied btnteH ol Ainenca, and havinj,' an oflice and j biiHineHN m the Citv and District oC Montreal '•— /A-/,/, tliat tiie'v were ol.lijred to tile a p(j\ver of Atturnev under Art. 120 of the Lode of I'rocedure. The Globe Muliinl Life Iim,ra,we Co. v. The Sun Muhtnl JAf. Inxur- auce Co., 1 L. N. 1;!!), & 22 J. C. J." ;f8, S. C. ^/■Action on Subscription, see LVSUR- 14,3. Where a creditor of a railway company brought action aaninst a shareholder (w th'e amount due on hJH sjiares, defcndaiil (lied decliiiatciy exception, saying that he ivMidal in Manbridge, in the countv of Mi.sHisT|uoi, and that the cause of action arose in Ifedfbrd, in said county, which was the place where he subscribed for his shares- y/e?,/, that the cause of action arose at Miintreal, where the com- pany had its principal otHce and where jiid.r- meut was rendered lor the debt ANIES, JOINT XTOCK, 170 I'lH. But, AeW, that interpHt m. o, ol thecoupoiiH rin omIvZ, ...... ""^ "'"""nt ^--yfnve.-.rS:;l'LMr ';":;'• r;i''- •"'IMC Iron Co.. to one I \r *" " ''>' ""•' •••■ceipiH we,e H,.r,„.,| hv ,^.7 . ' "" "' "'e by (he Hirreturv ,1,^ . l-'-eHHienl and Ihree i;'"-''"' 'V-X' ilrat'^'rri^H.e ';'■';■'"'"'"« '""7'nen and could nol LVve «L J ' ''''"" '^'■'P'sund that Ihei r preside N tan ,"'"'^'"""'^, ''e- I'ounlliurity t ' Z' ' """i'| N>'crelai'v had Ibere was „„ ,.» , " ' ' '«' 'linniiH-ed, hs li-onCo. carrie,! ,,„. '"''''''' """ "'c Mois.c X[. POWKR OK PROVIVnir T ,.„ IM, The Provincial Legishiture l,„. XII. Shares. '•>!). Where sharoa urn im-ni • CHlls a,e |.t.n,i,ng .tu"", "7'"^' "•' "hich -'Ntil such' calls "u. . , lid, ; ,,,''r "^"'•^'•-'■'■e,l cbasiiigHie nnt liah'le f.ri ;!'7''r''-* '""•- ^<^r.lU mtckie, I I. N. 7ll!i'."c /;V/""'^"-'''- appeibul!';,3'i:Sr^^oaaS';f-'«; Stb^'&iri^^i,:!-!;,:^ t'" H.".er^ PHicland $45 ren,::i;;,„ft'' "e p;i.7' ll;!'' 'r» liowever, refused to accent H.f' "'^^o, trH.,sleree,an,l iheresponXnt w ?".'""" "^^ "^ t-rttct, inlb^n,n^. InnM v ,, I'f '""' '" "'^t carry out the a.Te e ,e t T 'i H** ."".«'''« to took aclion for i^Zl tJJ f;''"""«' "'P" ent in cash_//V , ^ '"''' ^i" tJicir e,,uival. tbe shares as hey'- Soj uT" ?;''-V^"t'' '^ to to transfer the a-feeneMt',; T "'" ^"' '■^■'■»^'"' ™t«of interoBt ioloiv 5r 'A"'"^"" """'-'"g a'^lower "earing tUe .^..^^[Z S?J„- ^y .-ui.;^_tl.f.a at%^^ « bcritt; and the Co., •JZlJ^Z^J^,'^^^ ^^ "le lie proceeds of the m ie K ir ' "''j'li'f ' ''-oni l*'"g two sums of or.ev tfl"! ^^i"'**-^*, purchasers of the prouerrvm' ^^ them as tors who had pri "CT c aiT""" -f «'-*^"- claim wasconteste.il,??,",^?"'''* O" 't- The priority of hypothec;- The clumTnr Jr''"''"*^ santsas to the larger .un. was I? , ''" f^'P^- i-Bttatingly.Asto^hean.aliint;:;:':;';^,;:- IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-S) •^^ -^ 4 1.0 I.I b£i28 ISO '"^™ ^ la 12.0 2.5 2.2 IL25 ill 1.4 1.6 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 V qv %^ v> ^ 171 COMPANIES, JOINT STOCK. tlint the Rentlenien enpnjred in orgnnizing tlip Ciiimila Steel Co. iipj)Oiiiteil live ot ilieiiiselveH a ;kjiiicI to piirciiase real eciitie hihI tniiUe otiier aiTaiif:tnieiits s|,ei;iljeil in tiie artic^lcN i,l asso. ciation entered into li_v the .-aiii i;entleinen. Tiie kiaiti inter alia ])'.\\vhnsv,i the jirojni'lv in C,nesti(jn hy u. deed whieli dcseriiied thetn a< '•ii(/istiaiU auxpresc lit C.1 twit en liiir rwiii perxoii, nel .jiiVn verlu des jjouvons (lui leiir sonl doini"' et coinine les repn-eiilans de eeilaitis aclionnaires en nn cerlani aete d'aM-oeiation Iia>Fe devant," etc., etc. I'ait of tiie ]miclia>-e nmiiev |iayalil(! under this ileed, viz., tlie .-aiil Slim oflf l^<:{,;i(l, vvasappjicd to tlie di.-«diar<;e of a privileged claim winch llie Crown liail upon the property. The a^.-i.-ianl coiiimi.«Moiier of c.own laiidH hecuine a partv to the deed and accepted the Hum ol SlS.i.liti'i,, dischar^'e ol the privilej:ed debt so due to tlie Crown, and in the registrar^ certificate of tin -aiiie it wii.x declared that liie purclia.«e price iiienlioned in the deeil ol Kale IS wholly difcliarfnd, a.s well a.s tlie claini.^ of tlie Crown memuMied in the deed of sale. Alter the Co. hail lieen oi;.'r.nized the board ceded and tran.xtened to the Co., I,y deed, the >aid properly in imiviiance of the triint.s in them repn^cd by tlie article.s of as.-ociation, hut iiotlimg wa.'isaid in particular as to the *1H,{.- 3(), or to any rit;lit.s tliey had in relation to it- Iklil, that the Hum in question was not paid by llie Co., nor by the agents of the Co., nor yet liy persons whose rights were transferred to ihe Co. and that, coiLseipieiitly, the Co, could not bo considered subrogated as to said miin under An. ll.-jii of the Civil Code.* tliiiiii' V. C'aiinila Steel Co. & Lloiid, \\ Q. L. K. 1, S. C. U. l»7(i. M XIV. SUUSCHII'TIOX. lilO. Where a shareholder, who had already paid some call.-, was sued for the amount of others, and pleaded that the Co. had tlirleited its charter by non-compliance with preliiiiiiiary coii.iaiciis-i/e/'/, that the fcjrieiture should have been first proiii.>unced,aiid the jilea was disinis-jd. ^ Wiiidiior JJotcl Co. v. Murp/ii/, 1 L. N. 7;i, S. C. l.'^TT, and contirmed in appeal. Itil. And where tlie .'aine plea was rai-ed to an action on a note, on which the same company appeared as endorsers, the plea was dismissed on the same grounds. Jiniik of Montreal v. Tliotiqisiiii, 1 J;. N. 7G, S. C. 1«77. 1(12. Jjiu in another action by the some Co., again-t a sharehoider for unpaid calls on stock, • Subropatloii lakes jlace by tlie sole operatimi of l.'iw uiid without a iieiiiiunl ; 1. Jii lavoi of .1 crudiior \vliopa\8 another cri'ditor whmeiluimis pieieruhh' to hisbj' reauoii ol iirivile.'e or hjiiolhec ; ' j n H. Iiilavorol the piirchiiser ol imimneablc nniiiorty who iiuys a creditor to wliuia tho ijrui.erty is !,» iiolhe- CBlud ; .... J 1 .i. Ill f(Vor of a party who jiayH a dclil for wliieli he is neldwiih otliers or tor otiieis, and has uii iiucicsl in pajii.g it ; 4. liilavorof a beneficiary hi ir who pavu a debt of the 8Uccc..-si n witli iiis onii nioiiujs j 6. When a leiit or debt due l)y one loii.sort aioue has been icdeoiiird ipr paid wiilillie m-iicvHol tli" coni- Iliiinily ia tid.i ca-e tho ulbt'r cons rl isaiihroKiited in the i-inhtBof iliocicdiior Hcci)rdiii(i to UieBliuruot s tousort In the coUiinuuity. iiau U. C. COMPANIES, JOINT STOCK. 172 tlie Court found that it was not proved that $40n,(JI)0 of capital had been /tock thu- snbscnbe(| for. rnioii Smiii,iti„n Co. &, (oiiilh,i;l,l K. L. 215, S. C^l'L. C. .1.71, Q. H. b^77. lf!4. Aiid.tfVH/j/cthata purcha-cr, subseijuent- ly to incorjioration of shares subscribed prior to incorporation, and win sini:e Ins piireha,«e has paid acall, isesioppcl from conie>tiin.' the valid- ity of his original suliscription. MueiloiK/ull et'il V. Tlip I'nion Naciyation Co. 21 \j. C. .J (i.i, Q. H. 1H77. liiu. The plaintiff having employed the defen- dants, a firm of brokers, to purchase some stock for hiiii, and paid the iiionev, sued lo recover it, on the ground that tliev iiad failed, and refused U> tran-fer the stock thus paid i;.r. The pl(a was that the slock was ,^oM him oii the 12lli Ftbruaiy.and on the same day acall was made, w-lneh was notified on the IHtli and payable or, the lulli, to which the transfer was sulject, ol all of which plaintiti had I.een duly noiilied, but refused to [.ay the call— y/cA/, that ilefeiidant- hail done all tliev had oeen eiiiploved to ilo, iuid plaintills could not recuver. Fairell k liilchie, I L. X. 7(i, S. C. 11^77. Kill. Action lor three calls of 10 per cent, each on a. $1,000 of stock subscribed by delen- ilaiit. The plea was that the delendant's signa- ture had been got by improper lepre.seiitalTons ot the agent ol the compaiiv, iind that he was not held by his vuliscriplioii— ///-/,/, that verlial testimony of what the agent .said at the time of subscription could not be received to varv the written consent of the partv. Xntifin. I Jn.'iur. (iiiveCo.k C/ierriir, 1 i.. X'. 501, tS. C. I,S78. _lli7. Tlie company sued the deleiidant for *oOO, calls due on stO(d< suli-cribed bv him. Defendant pleaded that he never siibscriiied for stock ill the present cmnpany, but in an ante cedent one which was being "organized— //«/.< reversing the judgment of tlie court below, that a subscriiition ol stock in a company to be tijrmed was not binding. Ji'a.seoin/ ^ TlieUnimi Aari;/„tioii Co., 1 L. K.494,& 2i L. C. J. 13,{, y. B. 187S. ' lliS. Ihe delipiidant suli.scribed tor .stock in a company, about to be formed, and received a letter from the secretary staling that his stock was taken on the same condition as that sub- scribed' by three per.soiis whose names preceded Ins on the book, and who had appended the Condition to theirsiihscniition tnat the company was to be a Hydraulic Company. The defen- (hmt did not append such condition. The Hydraulic Company was not formed but a Cot- ton iMill Co. only--7/«A/, that the deleiidant having signed the book unconditionally was not entitled to be relieved from babilitv lor calls. JoHe.SiV Tiie Mmitreiil Cotton Co., 1 L. N. 4o0, & 24 L. C. J. 108, y. U. Ia7». STOCK. 172 nut provcii that //(//((( Jiile siil)- I «■(■«' ClfUlt'd, UH oqiuraiio \ ; nor t ^(111 1401), 0(10— Tlif ileiiMiilivnrs taiMcd, iiiid I he ltd 0>. V. Lewi.% itriy to lie incor- liiit wlio never III nor jiaiii cnlls iililc on iIk'.-IocIv '(ri(/iiliiia Co- Ac n L. (J. J. 71, 'cr, siilise()iient- lisci'ilied pi'ior to IS liiiri'hase luH f.-tih;r llic valiil- II- Maalt/iii/all Co.,n L. C. J. lovcit tliedefen- imrchaHe some Moiiev, sued lo IK'V Mud till lei], ; thus paid I'ui. il^* ^olll liMII on •anit'dav n call III tlie li^tli and It' transfer was liad lieen ;iia- rcpieseiilalioii.s d llial. he wa.s Id, lliat verbal at the time of I'd to varv the 'iilidii..! Iiisur- N. (J. 1878. delflidaiit I'or ihi'd hy him. ^iiih.-crdied for Kit 111 an ante ■'i\u7A'd~JJi:lil in hclow, that oiMfiany to lie 1/ ik TlieUiiioii I L.C.J. VM, Ibr stock in a lid received a that liin .«tock I as that sub- mu's preceded appended the t llii' company • The deferi- idilioii. The led hut a Cot- Ihc (lelendant litiunally was I liiiliility for i/( t'u., 1 L. N. 173 COMPANIES, JOINT STOCK. ^-Sh?'icti^^K;,^|i^'^rockcompanv, «cnl.ed hy Mie de'' ndZ"'''pffthL^ if f'' never siibscrihed forsto, k ;„ ,, „' . S''''''''"'""^ Co., hilt in anothe • '^ ""' 1^ ""'-'"• Hotel Hotel Co. K^i/ ;:;'['"''>•. '^«'li''i the lioval "W,„d..or" ha been „',"■'""''. "'^" ""'-K' «"'! ih u-hich (hecu' a .rb •''■'' '^ " '*">"l-"' proof bv the plai, It Is tim .' "^' '" '''*''"'" '"' made b'etbre t 1 ' , ^''^ a'l«''''ition.s were action co„| n l! n'"'-'?' '"v""''' "''• l>.x.k,7le mib>crihe t he m . k ' ""' ""'"^''■' ''i"> to 'I'at they u'dd:,!. merchf.l""^^ «""••"'"«• --//'-A/, that the - u4 e\ 1 , ''■ '" '"'•^""■'" /«'•'«.//., could ;r I ^n . ;.; ' "^^ «•«-< a ' *ollo»-ii,jr, he '" ^i-' --"/rv'a ra^oth'j;^:';,!""' ^"'V'^'■"'■"^ pany forrehef,-b,u w 1 o «,, "'.,""' ^•-""■ e'ap-'f'd without I ,i " •"'"^'^e^.-i. Two vears AtUieendo ,:«; 'V''.f,'*''^,.'«f'f'proceed-ings. cent. vva.-declared vl I ** i^'^'-'^'"* "(ten per •^curred which m„ia | ' '"" '';V^'"^ive 'ires -^/'W, that n fe thi '"'•^' """" '"' '"' ">''''e too late for thriei^, ,' ' '^"•"■"'■-taneeH it was contract. w',:Jc '2 > " ^^ ''"'"^^■'''' "'' I'is -vmiSrS.r':;;:!^,^''''^''''^'"-'-"^^ stockoftheco.manv 1 . ? ^'''''^''nhers to the «"-vered thart e c^;, t; !['' r'''''- '''^«'''-"i-'-'^' eocety-. agent was cm, n; "T ""."'^ "''"' """ df .rent frotn U^ i^Tl Si";'! ' ""•"""">' pdruw — //,,/,/ ,u„, ,1 . ' .•5',': "3" 'be contestiniF' parol eviden e'. '' S„'t"''/ "«?? "^^ P-'ved li^ '^-'toon V. La tiovUte de Con- COMPENSATION. 174 A'V. SicRvicE Of. -iMl^o-i^^'Z^i-ilii-l^'eavingthepaperH "'"'•• "'"«'• and „.';?*'■'' '"<■ ^^onipanv at /.■'//^/roy tV., .1 L. X. l.U, S C 1880 '''^ y-Sri!;:!;^:;:; -!"'■'- witiding up o^^ C0.MI>AR[S0N OF HAND. WJilTING. I- Evidence of Expert.s. or^iio;;;:xni::?'t!,;;''-'kforabaia,.ce to a cheque .set up iv tl ^T 'i"' "' ^'"' P'"i"tilf eviden.x. of e.xpe ?s w ''" *f "^ »'»^ 'lei.Ied, the «"') to be entir^ ' ; , ,7 '; ''^ '"' 'itMe vah,; «;•'='' transaction a,- • t' "''"""'^ ""^^ »" flH'Oue lmdo,,.currei i n t) e , '"■''""^'' ^'-V "'e lii'siness. Cim-L i p 'r ''"'"■■'■'« <^' pla ntitts COMPENSATIOiY. J. Of AtTOR.VEV-.s CO.ST.S. !• Op Attohnev's Costs. ao;iSi;'IZ,?K;n,:;!;.-^/«|'-notbee„ ^^-^totrbyahaSi'Cb^^"-^ JI- OfCMlMsiNlNsoLVENcr. coljih^t in;:-^;Ac, 1875-^,,, ,,,, ; "« 'rom one insolvent estate 17" " '■''^'^'''"J tile balance due hy that o?l .f""""^'' "'«J nr. OFDA.M.iOES. fS.u;;„!!t.,?Lf^i:Se:^%"-'--- S;?t;;;aSin"^i^-"'Si2St5^. si 176 COMPENSATION. COMPROMISE. 178 IV. Of Debt Due Insolvent Estate. 181. Tl>e sixtli July, 1872, flefcnf» ol' briiiuly for $1!);!.75, pavablc tlie iM Deeeiiiher, 1872. Iti tlie coiimu'iiccinent of Nnvi'inlicr lie piirclm^ed from H. it. & Co. a note of L. L. '& Co.,f)f $212.38. iiayaliliMlie Hilii DecPiiiber 1872. for$l'.IO, which lie uaiti witli 'lis note at tliroe or four iiumthfi. '1 he note he pnrchaHcii was delivered him only liiree or four iiay« suhne- qiu'ntly to tiie agreement, viz., on tlie I2tli Novemlier, endorsed Iv li & Co.. Imt without recourse. The 14tii JJovember, li. L & Co. assigned to plaintiff, wlio was appointed a>Hi>:iu'e. and in his quality as sueh sued (or the anionnt due for the brandy. Defendant fet up the note he had purciuised in conipensation — Jldd, tliat under neu. lU of Ins-oKent Act iHti'J, ami arts. 1188, liyy, of tlie Civil Code* compensation did not an«e. Riddel Si Reay, 18 L. C, J. lliO, S. C. 1874. t 182. On the 31st July, 1875, the insolvent wrote to the resfHjndeiit as follows : " Messrs. " Ross & Co., Quebec, — On condition of your ac- "cepting my drafts to the extent of $4,750, at " three iiionths date, I hereby pledge with you " warehouse receipts and orders lor liOO.OOO 'i feet of my lumber now piled in Mr. W. Hill " Carter's yard, at Sorel, to be held by you as " security for the due repaytnenl to you of the " amount of your acceptance, $4,750, with a "commission oVl\ percent, on the same; and if "you are not repaid on or before maturity of "your acceptance, I hereby authorize you to " sell the said lumber whenever you think best, "at the best price possible, and, after cliaigiiig " 2^ percent, on sales of lumber and interest, il "any, at the rate of eight per cent., place the "proceeds to my credit. (S'.'jned). Walton "Sinilli." Thispropcisition was accepted, and on the3Utli and 31st July the insolvent transierie , by endorsement, to the respondent a wareli luse receipt for 475,000 feet of lumber, and gave him an order for the deliverv of 125,000 feet more, making 600,000 feet of Iiimlier. On the 2iid of August following insolvent drew on respondent for $4,750, and his draft, payable at three months from date, was accepted, and paid at maturity by the latter. lusolvent having lailed in busi- ness made an assignment of his estate on the 26th May to appellant, who was appointed assignee. Five montlis later respondent sold the 600,000 feet of lumber mentioned in the warehouse receipt, and delivery order for $6,600, Sayable on the 15ih June, 1877. Having de- acted the amount of the draft and charges, res- pondent placed the balance of the proceeds to tlie credit of the in.solvent on account of pre- vious indebtedness. Action by the assignee to recover such balance for the beuedt of the estate was diainissed in the Superior Court; but in appeal, held, that as llie lumber was not •Compensation t nkes place by ttie BoIe operation oi" law betueun Ueblu wliicli art' equally liqtiidiitcd and de- mandable, and have each for olyi'ct a sum ol money or a certidn (luantlty ol iiidetermiiiate tilings of the same kind and quality So soon as the debts exist simul- taneously tliey are mutually extinsulslieil, in so lar an their respective amounts correspond. 1188 U. V. Compensation does not take place to the prejudice of rlglits aci|Ulred by third parties. IIUG C. G. t Omitted iu first vol.— Eu. sold until after the insolvency there was no compensation of previous indebtedness, and the balance should liave been paid over to the assignee for the benefit of all the creditors. Judg- ment of Court below reverseil, and respondent condemned accordingly. Perkins & Ross, 6 Q. L. R. 65,Q. U. 1880. 183. But in another case, he.M.\.\\&i, under sec. 107 of the Insolvent Act of 1875 compensation accrues in respect of debts lalling due after the insolvency, when the transactions leading thereto began prior to such insolvency. Miner v. ^haw A The Mo/sons Rank, 23 L.C. J. 150, S. C. 1879. V. When Arises. 184. An assignee in insolvency who has made advances on the strength of dividends coming dnecannotset up sucli advances in compen- sation of tlieclaiiii of the assignee of the person who received the advances and who 8ub.se- qnently failed. Garemi . MAIJIIIAGE CON- TiUCTS. CONSEIL I)K FAMILLE. I- Advice of, nee TUTOHSHIP. CONSEIL JUDICIAIRE-^«e JUDI- CIAL ADVISEK. C0N8EXT_^W' PROCEDURE. I. In Co.ntkacts, see CONTRACTS. CONSERVATORY ATTACHMENT —See ATTAGJLMENT. CONDITIONS. ANcSr ^'"''"' "' ^'^^^'KA^CE. see INSUR- CONFESSION". I. Of Judgment, see JUDGMENT. CONFESSIONS. I. Evidence of, see EVIDENCE. CONFESSIOIfAL. I- Secrets OF, weELEOTTOW i a w t> ..a.^A.D EVIDENCE IZflltlJ'j;^^^,: CONFIRMATION OF TITLE-^e. i -I ILE. CONFLICT OF LAWS-^.e LAWS. CONGfi DEFAUT-^ee PROCE- BURE. CONJUNCTIVE AND DISJUxNC TIVE. LaVpLading. ^''''*'^'^°' ««« ELECTION CONSIDERATION. I- For Bills and Note.s, see BILLS, etc. CONSIGNEE— 5fee AFFREIGHT MENT. CONSORTS-^ee MARRIAGE. I. AOENCY OF. II. Evidence of. IV V.t^l'fl w' •"' MARRIAGE, ir o ""•■■'* n tlie IhihIiiiikI. "ifiai- semni v. Arcl„n„h,udt, 21 L. C. J. 302, S. C. 1877; 5'J&G7 C. C. 1'. C0NSTAP,L7i'(>,-*itiox. VJII. RlI.K AOAIXST WlTXES.SKH FOR. IX. What is. I. By As.siukee in J.vsoi.vexcy. 192. Under Iii-olvent. Act, 1875— //c/r/, that an ii.s.m;,'iiee who receives from the court an Older to well the inoveal'le,-^ of uii iiiK,)lveMt, in (idertopay a pi-ivilcjred chiiin, and who refuses tooliey such order, will lie condeinned to iin- prisonineni lor contempt (jf court. lUnuin & Bimchanl in re & JJoutre & C'raiii, 7 K J^ 445, S. C. lS-(i. "^ II. Commitmext for. 193. The prisoner wa.s committed to prison for ten days, for that he, " bein;,' peraonallv pre- sent hefore the said Conn of Sessions of the Peace, haih this day heen guilty of divers gross insults and conteinptuous liehavior to the said Cc.urt of General Sessions of the Peace for the district of Montreal, and liath heen guilty of contempt to the said court, hy using Bbiisiveand opprohious language, hy refusin" to obey the lawful orders and coiniiiands of the Baid court, and by using violent and threaten- ing gestures before said court." The commit- ment then goes on to state: "Whereas the said— in consecpience of such in.soleiit and con- temptuous behavior, contempt ami language, 18 here adjudged, ordei'ed and condemne(rto be imprisoned," elc— Held, that the oftence was sutii<:ieiitlv set out and described. Mr- Namee exp., 3 L. N. 197, & 10 K. L. 311, Q. 13. 1880. CONTEMPT OF COURT. 180 by order of the judge, was the (bllowiiig moyen : " 3. I'(irn;/iie rrjiii/riiieii/ iiji/inl il la hire des proceilci un,ir eli\ ,:;iiive a la xiK/c/eslion im- mumlede L'llon. M. A. I'lmnowloii." The word immuriile had Ik-cu effaced with a stroke ot the pen, and in the margin the word ///^,/((Z suhsiiluted, without, how-ver, anv ment'ion at the l(n)t of the petition of the erasure or marginal note. 'I'he jii.lge, to whom the 'peti- tion was presented, being the same thus relerivd to, held the e.\piessioii thus used to be a C|inlcmpl of court, ordered the petition to be locked up by the prothoiioiary, ami the attorney siirniiig It to appear lo answVr the euiiiempt a"t Ihe (.peinn^' ,,| the ne.M term ol the court. On appeal, the Ciiit of t^ieen's liench refused to interfere with the judgment. Cliiimuaiine & IMuiKjn; 9 U. L. 328, Q. U. 1877. IV, Defendant to he Allowed to Ex- plain. 195. In ca,Meof contempt of court in fa-im ciiiKi; the delt'iidant should be allowi'd to e.\piain his conduct. McXumee En., 3 L N 197, Q. Ij. 1880. P.ou.vi. V. Delay to Commit. 19(;. Where, in a case of contempt of court m faniv ciiriif, the judge presiding ad- journed the court from the morning until the alternooii, in order to consult with another juilge— /A'W, that the atljournment did not vitiate the commitment. McNamee exv.. 3 L. N. 1!)7, Q. B. 1880. ^' W. DisiiKOARi) OK Injunction. 197. A ivrit of injunction issued enjoining the company, defendant, not to proceed with the execution of certain works. The company liisregarded the injunction and continued the works. On this the plaintitl' sued out a rule tor contempt of court against the secretary of the Company— /7('Ai, that no such rule would lie. Tiernnn v. Li Cie. de Chcniin de fer de Montreal, Ottawa & Occidental, 8 1{. L 374 Q. B. I87ti. VII. For Unfounded Opposition. III. Contained in Pleadings. 194. In a petition for a writ of prohibition todefendants to prevent them proceeding with an execution tor costs, which had been'taxed 198. Wlien a defendant alter judgment and execution liled an opposition founded on the allegation of his pleas— 7/,./-/, that he could not be condemned to imprisonment for con. tempt of court until the merits ot the opix)8i- tioii had been adjudicated upon. Dawson & Oyden, 8 II. L. 71ti, Q. B. 1877. VIII. R-'LE against Witnesses for. 199. A witness who has made default to appear and give evidence, and against whom a rule has issued lor contempt, must appear in person to answer the rule. Fair y. Cassels, 3 L. N. 337, S. C. 1880. IX. What is. 200. A witnpss neglecting to appear before an accountant, appointed by the court, in obedi- :!OURT. 180 181 ('OXTHAOTs. LOWED TO Ex- Tin- '^/;J / 1 ■;;:;";'■' ; ''"• ""■ "'i'^-- i.uii' CONTRACTS. is^ '/e.v l.,i,i,;.„i: I !• Vr 'lit ' lifiiiiii I i: yer '/-VA A^" tV a"^"^';'V""''' '" /'"•'■^-« CONTESTATIOX. f ,i. ,?"'•"'« CAPIAS. '• ill. u> Ui.,'o.siTi(j.v,.ve« OPPO.SITIO.V. COXTINUANCE. I- Of Acriox foh Uosrs, ^e« COSTS. COXTEACTS. I. AoT.ox ON- l>Ks..„,pv ,.v. .,., ACT 10 V JV. lillKACK OP. V. CoN-SK.VI'. vr. Co.VSIDIirtATIOV I.V. ToL ^"'"''^" "^ Ki;soL.T,„v OF D.aKc- AUU-."- ^"'^''^«'^™« BKTWBE.V Vo.OA.VD Vom- IX. Effkot of. X.' Im.kgai,. TIOV.S.''''''""' ^"•'■'''"'•'"'^•noN, we OBLIGA Y I ['"'^'^"'■"KTATIOV OF. j.p^^V. L1AI.IMTYOFM1XOR.S ON, «ee MINOR vTr ^r ^'i'^^'«*!'CK, see INStJIUNTCE TRACrs!*' *^*'"''*"'^'' *«« MAKKfAGK CON Xyjlf. p,nviTv OF." AfX. Proof of. III. iimiNo, .»ee ACTION. n. Alternative Oblioations. WOO, unloum or«, ilp ion '"mT'""-^' •"' It wa.alle.ro (hit , nil' ^' '"?''\ of appellant. tl.e corpcM^u . S *Li r.^'"'"^'-^' """''' ''-^ parish wa.. author /«)' T ' i " •J"">'"'' "'' "'^ the ricrht of navln., ,1.0 ^.'- *^"' re.servei made on re4onden?I't.^'"*','^^""'"'' '""1 ''^'-n but the r4r-r'!i ^errf' °'T d"bentureH, were taker, for a"rnn i ' .""'^ ''""clusionH a.ou„ti„.;.oX,;iaSSJa,tS;: in the hand / ''«■•'' d.-popted HdK.,,ue ;-"'7' ''-''t^.h^iwo'tie' J'' ;:,'ri'''" ;;3i.«;.,,H,;,::';i;r:;s;;:;;s':',;;;;:;;;' ilH dale ' •), r^^"*-'^'"' ""' «I'«'aW«//,^, 2 L. N. 2.50, 183 CONTRACTS. CONTRACTS. 184 ?00. The pinintiir luiij niiothcr pntprc! into n pnrtner.-lii|) ii^jrceniciil wiili llic (woilctetiiliint.s In t<;mi('rt()rccrluiii7. In a CHsi-of hrcach of contract to deliver poxseHNion of premises lease,l, noininal (lainiiiies Hlioiili he awanied hv the cmri, alihuiiL'h no ppecial (hiinnKe w prove,! to have resiihe,! from he liieaoh. Af„/ruir v. Jiihinrilh; 2.! I.. C. .1. lt>.'>, 8. ('. K. 1H78. 208. Tliephiinlitr, May 7th,soM defendani fiOO tons 01 Imv. deliverahle •' at such times and m such onantities" as defendant should order. J he lielendant havin^r „,,|,.,,.,| „„|,. ,^ ,„„,,,^„, of the hav, thenlamtiir, J„lv 2Hth, notilied his readiness to deliver tiie halance, und (hen dis- posed o( It hy private sale— /W-/. (hat the (erms 01 (lie con(ract lioun,! tlie purehaser to order the hay wKJiin a reasonalile (mie helore the new hay was put on (he iiiarke(, ami (hat (he vendor was at liherty to sell at priviKe sale an'. 482, 3. c. Since appealed to Supreme V't, -M. On the contestation of a claim in insol- vency It appeared (hat (he insidvent and the claimant had been joint owners of a property near Montreal, known as the (}re.'.>rv pViiifrlv aiMlon the Kith Aiij;iist, 1S78. the claimant sold hisn,teres( m (he property to the ins„l vent for »7,;)l)0, (he amount now claimed. Tlie (i.llowini' day, however, (he insolvent drew up a paper" which theciammnt si;;ne,|, acl OK CliEIIITORS. ,w« DONA- nu.\, INSOLVENCY, SALE, TRANSi<'ER. 2L). Respondent was the assi.rnee of the in- solvenles(„(e of l)inninj;& Webster, merchants ol l^iiebec, which held a niort;,'ajie from H 1) on the "Norwe;.'ian," a steamlioat then in course of construction. H. I), became insolvent, l\'"' "'' 'i'i"« ll'i'i'' claim the creditors allowed U. & W. to take the vessel at their valuation on jiwmji promissory no(es f,,r (he balance. The iio(es were not paid at nuituri(y, and on the '.8th Jnl.y, 1H77, D. & W. transferred their hypothec on the " Norwegian " to the appellant lbr«;(i,500, the transfer being registereil the same day. On the strength of (his transfer D. & W. obtained delay from the bank for the payment of notes line them. On the ;^rd of December, 1878, a "Titol at(achnient in insolvency issued a^ain.st them. Action by the a.-signee against tiie'bank to set aside the trausler of the hypothec, as bein-r the proper mortgage of all the creilitors, and not ol the bank only, and as having been made at a time when D. & W. were in.solvent to the knowledge of the bank-/y,.W, in appeal, revers- ing the judgment of the court below, that there was no proof of the essential allegations of the pamtitl, that on the lHthof.ruly, 1877,thedate ot the execution of the transfer, the bank had reason to believe that the transfer was niaile in conteniDlation of insolvency, Stadacona Bank & Waike, , 10 R. L. 381, Q. B. 1880. 185 CONTRACTS. X[[I. IxTKiiiMu;T\Ti(t.v or CONTRACTS. 18(5 .216. QiieHli.-n ,ih to tli<- intiTDrclation tn 1,,. (. H u„ , wh,, l,,,,,Khi ,ur hi ilun.l o. .Ir ,; rsf ri .r:r;;«,l-«;r;i;,.M£}r = ':E;r;:r;i;:^;;t,;7°'"'»v' e.xclm.ige (or c«h|, or f-o^cu ,'"''■' '," iol, aeconli„j; to the ,h,?; "'"'"' "" ''""'' poHy." Thesew^o'' ^;n,n ?'«"-l-- pai'l ..D tKn; the.lelen,la„Uha,l ..either refold, beoa.He*^thou!h re "" ''"" "'"^"''^ '"^ up to that i,ne i^,,?, "'.^ '"""gage re.naii.ed st'l'uhitiri, he deed ',."!"■' rr '" ^' "'« otl..T hand, tl f plain ff iL. "*7'- *?" '''*^ timt these sen e,„„n i '' ," P'"'" 'ntercHt «peculation^r era.;:" tl""n ^''' '""'''' «" a».v portion o^'her Difi .'Ji '''^ "'^' P**"*' ^'''' without chari, n,^ ^ .V'' «^^' security as vendor, its pio, or.i\n^ ."^ .' ' P"""^'"" specially with '■on, and I can.iot conceive how the mak- 'x;:,;i:::ra::e.:;:ft'!'7;;.:!'';.,i '-'v ^• j"'i«.ne,,tw,iihe;t :.',/;::',;:;; /'■•' "'g'l,edeli.nda„I,Hlo .Xe m^ ,';;'' 'l'''" ;-];::;^::;..::::;S^::;;;ri:- ;i! 1'- "IV>''a^iN.l^M,,ent is i.aii ';,'';;■';• '•'*•• '"" iV Archnmliiiiill. S. (.'. |,S77 cov r the a.,.o„nto( H eon.M.iJ,,,,, M,„„la, d V '"he was e,„-a.„| „. ,„„„,„,. ,„■ '.'" :;,,'■' '""''"I- Ajviimi ...ij ,i„: i. lH«'j'*'a,'^i'."'' ''eCcrMant <„. the lOtl. of SepteM.her u.M'ee...e.^. . ■ ' I "'e "tnv, e..lei-ed into an H„Ke...intotex(;han<,'eol'l(it,swiihlheDliiintiir da.u was ohl.:f rr' '^'^''="^^'"". ^n'' tl.^' delin- hfs vault," i^'..'*'«°"" ^^'"' til" lMuld,n^.of which was notdoue. lb. 3 L. x\. 218, Q. K\m. 18< CON'TKACTS. I, .'''"''/'''"■"•"''''■'''''•'''''' <»'i<^l "MMi, timi us ,),,. (,.„,,,„ I, ^,„ ,,|,,,.,,„ ,..„,,„ Ih < nuU „.|,HV Ml ,|,H r..H,„,.| „,,S ,,I.,.,M..,I — I. Aii.v ai.,l>ii:iiiiv „r iiM.cil.nnlv iii'il,.. ::;;;i:''"ir7'''^'''''i'''^ -. m^;,:- i ;: ,t ■nil,,., |,„| ,|..,nvn „,, |,y ,„„, ,,, ,, .• , I'e puvaMc uCl,.,- (1„. lirst ,.,.11, i|„.re h.. ' , >M,1 II,,. s,,.|„.„K. W„H al„„„loM,.,|. Til,. , vs. ru ,,le,, ,. ,j,,ii,.,| ....n,.,iis«l..„,o,|,..ani. 1,1 .„■ ... . ; ''V'"'."'"' '-"'t'n"! '"n.isl,,.,! l,v .u ,.u.,i l„.|w,.,.„ i|„. ,„,,,,i,„ „i Q„„i„,^. „ Ulh 1,.,| t I,.,,- ol,li,i:a(i„„sa.'.MM',|i„., t.. III,. ,. y '/,/ "l,',:""''! '"" ^""i'-''"' 'iH..,.'ge .i.Hl lis- lortli,^ co,istiiu..i,on ,.f part ..f a .ailr.iu,! tliat an I ifa "'"'T '■"^■'"" '"" ""■ '^^'""•"^•'. ok to ho ,lo,.o H,.,i all the .n.ite.ials pn,v„i, .< oontraclors have (lio n^lit (o l,e fa d e ,' „ Of k CO ,'.;'''' .''.''''■' '"' '' '"■ ""''''■■'^"'•■'i"" 8 ^Irt ''I' "" f^'-O'i'^^ion to co.,.pl,.ieit t.e prop,', .for o„ the co,i.,-a,.v. has cont„iu.,l a..a co.„p|,.te.i the work Iim.is^IC, an,| „se , .mtenals p,.,.pa,.,.,l i,, tl„. ,x„i U^acto s ^ 7? */^""'''«-. !* H- I^. o87, Q, B. 1879. ^,1 r .'* "■'■"I'lK •'■■'>«« Sfiiui privi Dlaintiff pni'chased Irotn dete„da,it 2,2(15 .M,r Is u wood remit' of .''^ ""■ :"";'' ,^"'""J-' 'acknowledged theZifh j'^T'',' ''"'''."•'''' ''i>''«>lf 'atis^e.1 gurimlie uUerwure. The pui-cliaser havin.r ""d a portion of it rotten. S,„t fbr vah e of ~miTtt\T''!r'^ the part that wa.s rotten fl„7 ' ""*' ''-'' "'« ^^"»'* *^'' tlie ugi'ee.),e.it, Jj"o.f^:nhSaSi^i^r^x^?^: obJigatiou coiuaiaeci au uudertaking to pay a CONTHACTH 188 "..... o( nio,i,..v„„ a llx,.,ld,i.v,"y;„„r t,„u ,/,/nU ""I'll- .u, ...M.rlak.hg t„ pay mtetvsn,,, ,|„. 7;'",'! ""■ 'I'^y ll.f p.i.v..i.nt h,.,:u „,|„„. ,,,i;-:';,„;V"'r *•''"'-'■."'■»?:""■'"•• "'ni. ..ot •l"l",g „tlie pni„.,p,..| ol,„.,.| „,|||.. ,..Miv,.„. V'". '"'ik..s priH.f oi .tscMiienis, wlK'n ,1 ..on- taiiiH a separate and diNtinct ohligalion. //,. XVII. I'AKTiKs TO, Cannot Ai.i.kuk tiikir OWN KlUl'U TO Avon.. ^ 227. AelioM to set asiile a de,Hl of 8ale of ,u. ".'..ov..al,le. on the ground th.it plaiiitilf when ''■''';';'V''<;;l'-l>y.'"".-olv,.|,,,andt,,uisler,,.d " " h s l,n,||„.,..|„.|a,v, a pe,s,,n of no n„.ai,H, in o'lerU,s,neil li'oin hi- ,-.vditors, and with the "I'l''.-""!..'!!.,!; thai, as soon .is planitdl shoi.1,1 he rel„.v,.d „„Mi Ins einl.uraJnie.it, the p,';! •rt} should he r,traiisle,n.d to him-//,/,/ l..itnoo,ie.|o„|dail,.;;e Ins own fni.id to avoid iis:';]"i;'*S7H.''~*'^~-*^-^-j- XVIir. I'UIVJTV OK. 22H A condition i,, u ,.,ihi,r ,le.i ch 3% 11 lMMtp,,..|U„., ,0 ,|>.. res,.,„„l..nl (i, n h-S i".:?^:ii;^T;,,,^^:';;::-t::;r'';;^pp;; :::^:;,!:r::;:.:i::,-;:,::;'■s:;'■-'''^^ timl ,l,>riMB ihe wint.T l|,..v .sm,,.|,,,i " Sum';; ; '1' "*", '"^'.i.""-'' ^^'^^^^^^^t tl ■ va ,„. o M„i,er,uls ,s„|,,,li,.,|. |„-h oI' p-ot "mm,. 01 wl,u;i, ,vu. ,.1 Wc.t Furn ,u l\Z\ ±.^t:^Sr'::.-;;.^l;rS';r|r,';s r;;:;r £•''-- ''^'^ !'- '^--^^^^ Si. 'u::p";r''i:^:r'='K-';:' CONVICTION. IflO J\- L.AM„,nv OK CoxroKAnoNs KOK A.rs 2;i:,. (;urponili„„s 1h.|,| liable (,„■ „,,h „f '" S. -;S: ^'\!:^;, "^ ''^■"' ^^^ '-- ^'^ ^ CONTU.VITK I'AIf ('()|;|-S_,SV. I.Ml'KlSoXMKxx. COXTUIHl'TOKV NK(aj(;KX('K_ /SVc nk(jl|(;k\('|':. CONVERSION. COXTKACTOIIS. !■ lilADlMTV OK. Fur Arriilfii/.i. y<>r Work ,l,„ie. n. Luim.irY OK ■ CoR..oi:.vTioKs kor Acts OK !• Luiiii.rrv ok. T e \;;h''," '■'^"';^'''«'' '"'"i"n. WHS Jiz :^ i lie work liiii »'i(i or f f..il 11 . lonui^. iii-Msoir (alii,, ,_/k^' ,1, ;,;'"' "" '" p''*'^*'"^ P'-ecaiuion o P the m,. "• "7%"'"-' ^^'""t -^l' CONVEYANCES-&.i)KEDS. CONVICTION. I- A n.Ul TO OTllKR PUOCKKMINOS. J • 1.1-.RTI0RARI KUOM, xee CKU'JIOUAltr. 'IJ. l"-KKoR l.v, 'V'. Full !)K?(KI!TI..N. VII. Kkoilaritv ok. !■ A IJ.IR TO OTIIKK Pro()HK1M.\(;s. I rJi^^' nf'/.'' •'"■ ""\'i«i"U«pro8e(mti,.M nn,I ar- iiilhv In. ""')'" "■"",' "• ""'«'• J'l^wmice u leteiMant tnu«t have know., ve.-y well • yet Je t.o,>j|l., proper, um |,e had Kl.-,ellv a r '-ht^'o K... IT " ''P' ^''-'''Iv c....,e at. la li.ere sich a th.i.jj as the possil.i ity of d.uoC of XonX?"'^7 rf:i,a„ie c.:.;^'^;::; ^ M.ai.u .1 the taceot a coi.victio... I thoti-ht aS,. *fi '^'*"^ °' ^"'■'^ '■■'• 'J'I'e City of e . . a!' ':;'"''.'■";•'■' I" .^'■vit'w two or three ^k,.? Si ■ '"'r'J''-"all.v .0 into the c,ue,s. mtil V P'-^P'-'^'ty of the co..vi«ti„„ It ceita.i.ly was a peculiar case, a,„| I havo altl' ti;' ill ''""'-:■ "' .P"'i-"--. l.-l I'-n aim t« i ,Tr"":if' ^>' "^ P-'-^n who was eTf to urn ."•'•"'"' •'"•'r"P"" '-"k "I"-' In.n- «ctof,heirofticei::'LS'[Sd'^rpa[;?c^! victed o( resisting tl.e police upon tl officer's teetintony, wJ^ereupou tL plaintTlf in thai ca.e 191 COWICTION. |« I .1. til,. |'.,1„.,. Mu^,|,,ni(,. fornri .i-',,„|t. ,4,„| l.ryM.MH,Mu.u..M,.,,|u„,4.H.,. -,„...c ; 'w- III! lliHl ll.f (;,.r|,.,Mition pU.lnl (.. iI.p "'•"""• ', 'w„nlul„.n.«o uUioniH „ e mITuII'"" r? '""■ '" "'•' ^"'''"""'" i" 'i 't rfvu.w a. ,t Ht.MKl. an,l..v..nini„. tvv„ croi" tl.nv wa. the ..nnvM.tion ..f ,|„. ,,nl,c,.,„Hn lor that ,,n«.l of „.,.,t „r ,„.,.hal,l.. cau- . a ' ••••,s,y,.h r..l.u.t..| l,y a .;„„v,.l,.„.. I„„ at . .•.(...rway. I., ,|,, „,„k I ...Vj i„> ' , ,' n.i„„.l„.rni«,., wl„.r,. all tlu- n.k.« j-ov.tmim.' }wlli il,,. ij.|)ii. -..,1 cases .„, (vhiuh their uuthur- haM ahvay- hecn c.M.MerH) as ..C ,|.,. m.'st nm;M-ary (U'cinive aiilhurily. Where a c.i.i- Vlct,o,. IH ,,„rever.e,|, it ,h conclusive evi,|e„ee O lie tacts. See Kawcett vs, F.,„.|es, 1 I{ an.lC 304. Atra.n: "Malice an^i wan. of ,,rol,al,|e cause, however, are eoii,li,M,velv ,lis,,n.v..l hv he ••-"ivielio.i or the ..laintitr.'" AJWIor ri: Jaihleley, 2 Cn. an,| a1. .175. If i, .,,i,|,| j.^i otherwise how coul,| I (lossihlv ju,l«e o the fairness o( a conviction Jn which I ij^ Z o.ie WO.VI heli.re ,i,e of .he eviilence pvei Cr o ajruin.tit? No;In,as, hol,lto.he^ile\l.|i"l 1 have never seen .ieparteil lroin-an,i I .Jo so the plaintiff lm,| a iK-nnission of the Chief ol' mii-t hol.l thai the conviction was ri^-ht. an,| the cu.nplainant ihere was rrjjht, so tar a- .he law i:oes;un,| thouKh the Chief ol Police coiilil not oven-hie the law any more than the coinniit.ee men who toM hmf to ,lo so, he e f^lH null got under the circnmsUmces, at the ^.stance ol ,he delemiant, who mnst have known al ahoi.t ,t. I iherelore disniiss the S c! 1879 ' ""' ''''^- ^^'''""^"" '■ ^""ikeu, 237. In an action of damages for assault for which hedefeniiant had alre.lJly l^en Hned the Recorders Q..mn~.Hehi. thai a conviction for assault may he ph-aded in har toany other po ceedings, c,v, or criminal, for the sl.ne can'-e/ 2^K R r- ''"T"-'/ '- ^"^^ '5^'«- C.R.1H80, lK'ollence,'so as lahle .he court to see whether there was "'' l.v a violation ol the law or noi. l',,,!, r lie amhoritv in Pal-.y^ c.,„vi,.tion .im^hel w h usis. JSima exp., .s. c. 1877. CO-PAllTITIONERS. TIOJ?'^*"'"'"'"' °*' ^■^'''*''*' "^"' •"'" PARI I. III. Error in. Pnnv?'..'^''^r f^''''""''.'" was imprisoned under a conuction for assaulting a constable in the per- Thona"'s"'^'rt'\"'^i,^ ^^ ''"'' ^'•°»«'" ''^fo--^ 1 o . as .S. Judah, K„^,„re, de.scribed in the P '^i,' ..*"'v'=°!''"'''°" "« Magistrate of Police tor the District of Montreal, which was error^as he was merely a Justice of the Peace! * Sue 32 and 33 V. C. 20, seo. 46. co-mopiaETORs. Jv H"'' J^^T'TI.KDTolNMirNCTION TO RK.STRilV O.Nl- A.N0THKR FRo.M DkaM.N.J WITH THE CoMMO^l PROI-KRTV, see INJ UNCTION. ^'"^»">'< COKPOEATIONS-^ee COMPAN- IES. I. ACIREKMENT TO PAY IN StoCK OF, i . liooKs or AS Evidence. *ee banks"*'''''' '''"'^'"'" "'' ^^^"lut.on of, RAILWAYS "^ "*" Franchise by, see STREET y. Injunction aoainst. yl. Liability of, for Acts of Other.s ^\PI- Mandamus aoainst. i\. Minutes of Dihectors need not vs |!|^^NTo Members, see BUILDING SOCIE- IONS. 192 193 COHPOIiATIONH. ((in-.). //,./,/, il.Bt III llif liu;c (it (lie cr win iiinclmrL't'd. C. ISMO. viiMi liir ilt'*(.|'(iiij^ 'I'liiiii iith'r II liiiliii^ l.v licUirc II witiiCHN. . .ttl, S. C. IHHO. IIaIIKAH CuHI'l'M. to s"l asiilc 11 (•(iiii- i:lii>ii hiiiv 111' |irii iiivuIkI. ' VnllniiK ()■!(■ groiiriil wiiH lif cimvictiuri huh 'UT.>< AND AlCOlNTH OK l.hiliiiiiii for. XIII. Slk'vi(.'e of. I. AOREE.MENr TO PAV In htopk op. in'!J,.Ji;i;:r,:";:^;'':;i;ir';; ''"•'■'' '^ fi:M.:U7io,asc,,M,,issi, ''V//':/"'''"' works ..( iIk' MoMinul i> ,. '7'.*";^'''i' II"' Kallwav^m,ll;/;v;?; ';,'; ;:;''\"''; »-'^'''n 111 iiioiifv M-ifuij oi ill 111.. 7,";""""'' " '".^ CORPon.\Tl()NS. 194 I ^' fNJrM'TION AOAI.VHT. II. nooK.s OF, A,s Evidence. ;:.S!i:;:;;;; -';,;:;;; S,-;;£«^ HI mod to ,e at ti.e olKce rea-iy for Ins, re o^ I.er., and hh, m any ca.o, tl,e cl.Tk I ad m power over ti.e.n e.xcep. as the se van o , |e Cunnal, a rule caMi.or lx> Krante.l %,, , i Lant'Sh,.'?" "''"'°- *^i"'' "'^ director., of a stock cJ^Tp^Si' *"" "'"' - ^' ^^ <»• * Stephen,' Jol.t gi^i".!' tw,'iro"Ie Of the tJIfi'^L^i''" ";'^. •«'"■' •"" been A BulSpana harden. r."^".""'"'^^ .Johnson, J., »aid: B«nque .Jac.j is Car Her) a. d iCJ^ corporation (the ""dl an, asieil for a rul'eTai.Hrtl^Z* "V' »I'I«"eU, •ere on corporations th.n.u,";'"- ^''« '"»' <=""■ and, theret'oro, M ovide ' ?,„ ™i" '"*, '"'^"' b« »"eU, treated lu all otlw.r T,„t.- I"' *°'* '"r their UdiiJ hiddini, «",1,I| ,, .' "; "," '".l"'";'ioM lor. ;-'•■ ...^''.-'^r'i;;;;;::;:::;,': 't:vr', "'\ nZi'zsX'r^ ■.'Mn;'i:;^ ^:: .11 null n (III' ai roiinlM ul t .1, (\. 1 mil . la iMNVnt liM of ' '■''■'"•'''^ "•"^' »'w t'<«-;H/.v.v„„„.„, 2 I.. N. 1U7, .IS. I,s7ij' ''" "" VI. '''AIUMTVOF. FoKArrsoFOUlEI.... V'U. Luiiii.iTv Mkmiiekm. OF, FOK Neolioence op -S'MiInn;;;:;::;r^:r';i:e:tr;:r('r''^. '"Hi'lol- piaiiwill, who was kill ■'''*' '' '■■''■ •'•:»''i^^'p'iMedaV;,.ii,;' ; ;';;:";«''«'• ';' "M '.'Id cannon, wh,, )/ la 'li',,. 1 '.'''"'''''? Hi'ii un'l.. the li .",]'''";"'• 1""' f'- ai'proval •iei Tlw. ''."'"'"on ol the «(:hoo authori- •'»■'• ilie delendaiitH headed tl.m .1 ""^' //e/.uhat'';;;,;:;;:,:^,i'';':-,;;l,,;^™i;y.t-- VIII. Mandami's A0AIN8T. 251. Mandamus will not hV f,, „„ 1 21 L. c. J. aits c., Ssre '""' ^^"''""'^ ^'''•• IX. Powers op Majoritv. dive evidence; and the II ni*„.^" *'*"''■ compelled to principle impiis.ibirA cofnoE,?,^ "*. '" ^ "^ Jli-puto any pt.,-s„n to Bit^e the r «nl^»~ '' '' *''""y in cr«8».esan.ina,ion that tlfpv W I^P"" ""attera communicatii.n of. A court 7i i ~ i"*" "° Previous that lt.annot execut^ in\rmt^lTZJ'? •''"'^"•ent .0 me altogether ImpractiSi'hT;; aa/," Vi^re.r Tfa-^ 195 CORPORATIONS. til t leir Immly, dppo.sited in the Bank ol Montred „1„<;1, ought to be given up to the ).la,nl,tts. Only twoofthe three. lelendants pleH,le,i. J'hey .il|Pg.,| ,|,at the n.oney had been ,,hu:e,i ,n their hands as trnstees (br the order; that the nu.jurily „f the onier had con- the 21.st hepten.her, l,S77, no order had heen in ex Mtyico nnder the ,,laintitr« name ; timt the delendantH hohl noolhce Cror,. the phiintitr. Jiv the evidence it appeared that the court, by » considerable majority of whom were the deien- iion :;. ,T' '';,"''r'/" '^r^' ''•'^"" ""'.i'-'i-i'"- iiehl, to the American or independent order, and to change the name oC the court uccordimrK- whicli was done, and tlienceforth the trii-Tees re used to account . to the minority, who iiUion-7y,A/ in review, reversing the judo- "cntof the Superior Uonrt, that the nu, oriry had a right to do as they had done, and the trustees vyere riMit in relusing to account to the minority, and in appeal the,//,s;>o»v7//-oftlii8 jndgmcnt was conlinned, but on the .r,.oi„,,| that the phtintills had not shown a n!d of action against tlie deCen.lants. Court Mount »• ^. K. KSMO, & Q. JJ. IbSl. CORPORATIONS. 196 X'. Powers of.* ..if''' .^I'l ^'"7'J- "'/ ^'•'"'«— 1" an action to pre\ent the delendants (rom manufactnrin.' and selling a remedy called " Svrnp of Red tlle'Z- ?"\' '^"■''■-Hileged, inter alia, ihM the detendants were originally incorporated bv 4 and 5 Vic, cap. <,7, nnder the name of "Th'e Montreal Asylum tor Aged and Intirm Women " and It was provided by the said Act that „;> tiling therein contained should atlect the rb-hts o( H..r xMajesty or of any person, or of anv £„iv corporate, such only excepted as are mentioned in the sai.i Act; that supposing the defen.lants should not infringe the rights of the plaintitis as above mentioned, the defendants, by nianu- acturing lor sale and by selling tlieir article the compound syrup of spruce gum, as an' article ol trade act in breach of their charter, and beyond the powers granted to them by * ACT TO PKRMIT OnRTAIN' CORronATIONS TO FUPInv MOllE 1-Hol.lTABI.V Till: R„:,u. ESTATE IN tie"b 1"os.si:ksio,n. Q. 42-43 Vic. cap. 34. Whereas theio are in the Province of Quebec n ror taii.nuinber..fCorporatio»8ackiiowlt.(iKe.Ii;yh,w ^^^ by their charters .•aii„„t acquire or ho),l\ "aV , ... ' beyoml a nimle.l amount, and \vh.;reaH tho.sai, ('on oia tlons could employ their pro,M;rty to Krwiter advai S It tn-.y «erep,.rn. ttedwheneve? ihe- dsposo of hem to employ the nri™ received upon other K^?Uat" Iht-relore Her Jlaestv, hy and with il.,. n,u".,r. „; 1 T" a'iI rnn" 'lH-'''t."./of .iuei::;!, 'Ln!!i'tsl\o" ,J™' 1. AH Corpnralious oi t! is Province which cRn.,,« aciuire real estate, hut to a limited amount iiderh^ provisions of their cliarterH or of t'>o law X 11 1,., . ater have ihe riKl.., when.vnr thJy dispone o or a i ,>' ate any real eslaie tel.,n^.ti,g to the n, to annlv t/m I,rice thensjl to the «c<,«i.iu„,>^r -ill ler r eat e" a' /a^ also to receive the reveimeB whatever thereof aiv J'aw to iJie conlrary notttltlmlandiug, ami to eninlov th^ fa.ne to the object, for which thfj- were conUit'ui.'d aw, and affect the right.s of the plaintiffn i„ the premises, the detendants eau.Jing to tl e plaintiffs damages $;!0,000 by their unj",st c, , ! petition on the market and vending the m) article; that the plaintilfs, to carrv^on th ir trade, have to pay heavy municipal ta.xes on heir bu«ine.ss and on the pro,K.-tv bv tht" occupied tor their trade, wbi'le the dele mJ , V nder pretence that they are a religi , ,d' charitable society, are granted cxempnon ,r" Innpf '' "Pretnre, lor the cause last me - lonet , as well as Ibr the ,,.auses above alle. e '""jiflH are well tbiinded in resti'im '^ the defendants Iron, practising a trade ineoi, - patible with the objects of n,eir in co po a- lon. Conclnsions-tliat the certificate .- otten l;.v detendants be declared null: thia the defendants be restrained from prepa . or -selling the c..m,K.nnd syrup of spruce ^nm ';;anng plaintiHs' trade-.na'rk or u p.M' o n' t It, or im,tati.,n of ,t ; that the defendants be con,le|nnedtoacc,M,nt for all profits, etc a id ;e enjoined to desist from nnVking or sVdli . miy article whale-er, for want of uuth V firir"'"t'° '"i''"' ■•""' tl'"t;ng the action ami tlHS jndpnent was conlirnu.1 iifappet 1 aC 254. To i».,ue Ke.jotiahle Inntrumenis ~ to t,e aken against it ,,n a note crparte n can no afterwar, Ls appeal on the grouifd of w u t f Q B. i«7?.''" "'" '• '^""""■^' ^ L. xV.^;^50, 255 The respondents brought an action a««.nst the appellants, a building socu' v. o tiie society by the president and secrelarv t passed by endorsement throu'h several I'ands to the defendants. The defem a, u pleaded by demurrer inter alia that lie p we of the society were determined bv C S L C cap. 69, and did not include the powe of mak: .ng prtjmissory notes, or therebv^.ind n° t em .-elves by the signatures of theiV p le ien a d seciv tary. They also plea.le.i a dlfhJ^jS '~f('''/' "!■''?. negotiable promissory note "»;le by a building society, or other ctii-nora e body not s,,e.nally ^ynUoruk bv its charfe, to make protnissory notes, is a promi.'e h 'd o t o le? of';? '''"' " ^^•'" I"Y """ 'amount to he 01 er ol the person name,! therein, and will be '•"^an 'the'" "?'^"-^^'fsn.ent'of indebted! ess , and t e endor.-ee thereof may recover the amount from tlie Corporation on^tiie ,ne?e production of the note in The absence of a olea pecially denying the e.xistence of the le' t^ o? tf.e authority of the ofticers to make tie note La SoaMde Construction du Callable XI, Powers of Officers. estS"of^Tfm!tf'''"rf """'^^^ er.*-fo«.-In the estate of limothe Payard, inso vent, the assi Kuee in possess on called 'bp na,-eM, hoth out or or^le ,L '^ ' ">' ''"''l' i-H^orporute,! t,w"";^:;^;!':^-f-r';'-.y Hie claim of tim l.< , v nn ■« „ ''"'? "" solution was passe i tl.J ,^ ''?'"'' ''''- anthoriziM« h' , to do^ w T' "' ''"■•'^""" sifTM a power of attor.K'v to the se ,. l > ' , ' as was done in thiscasi'. wi I ,!„, ;. ;' "^ '''?''-'• tv from the Uo^m) ..n I i '""''''■»"''"-"- COSTS. ,98 CORRUPT PRACTICES. I. At Elections, see KLECTIONS. COSTS. [• Action contini^kii for. ROU-H "'"'" ^"""'"'ATION KOR Nko,,cT OK ly. I)ki>o.sit For. vm.'iN^A^N!'^'^"^^- Ihj ,Sii//ro(/cc. For Acro'iau of T„f„rsl,in. iA InAppkai., ,.«eAi'l'EAL. A. In Casks in- Jns„i,vkxcv. A . JN(,u,n.NAI. Mattkus. All. In Jm.kction Casks. In llYcoriiKCARv AcTioN.s. ^UARiTLME Casks, see MAIlIirME 'XII. Rkports and Accounts of. tlK.r duty. I,, L '■'"'■■■' I".""-' «"--«e of siiarehoideVs o i^ as t '' I,/:', '''^'t '" "'^ and circulated hv Z ,',, ! ;'Th?,''l '^" '''-^''^'^ aseneral nieetin.' n,,f ' "' 'l'>'wtor8 or -Sy ti^rs:^ c.^s^'ir tr" r "^"- "P- '.y .^uch thirrpopl'/r, "i;!""'' ''^ '*'^'^'* ages or^.tim/£,?!"I'''''" .'='"""" •^''*'"^ ^an,. ''J nnsre^^ese^tat o;''i "ri' ^'^ P'"-cl'ase shares lK.ldthem wi on, ,'• .''^ ','"■'* continued to tliei.ntnlof'thp '"'""""' knowltni^e, of t'O'iglit then. )i;,"'^'f"-«^^-''"»"on on wh.ca he ^IH. Sekvick op. a«S.S?i;;^^^,Cf7\«r'«n'or »i'ay be made eitl Pr . V,"'''" "' ^ rocedure, ''», .frc, kMinh'tVr II Av" J' "/ T!x^'-y,"J»ient„fdeclaraliou. l^ertivran. Vonge defnul. '^ontrainte par corps. Motion witiiilruwn ^''■tijjoninnullitededecrel. It i.V:;t:',u'L'^S' ''■"■'•"-■■■ '»• TEiimcA.Tv!""' ^'"'^•^'^^''^"o. P.as on a XVviff ^^'"^"'^Desistkme.nt Filed. AAA. WuERE NO Articulation of Facts. I. Action continued for. ci.S!,ns';iri:?££C"r '"'^i "^ "— t.on of costs ndlamtir^^^ demanded distrac ass r ?■- 'i'-'-S'" ss 199 COSTS. COSTS. 200 for costs apftinst ||,p defcndnnl. Laplmte v. La/)/iiiile, .! I.. N. ;i:iO, S.C. 1H(;4. 2(i2. On ilu' 2ri.li,l Jinic, IK77, the plaintiff ins|itiitciliuiH<;li()iiiitriiiiisi one S. TiicdeliMhlant iileii.l.Ml t„ li.e tncnts, un.l tlicn die.l, Icaviin' ii Jttst will wlit'ivl.y tlie now .IcIiMnliiMts were iiotninated lii.s executors. Tiie present snit was in,~tiiMle,| to compel llie defendanls to take no the instance in the liiriner suit. It was returned into court on the I2th of Deeeinlier, 1H77. The (lefendaiits pleaded to the action en reprixe that thev iial settled with ihe plaintilf hefore tlie iiistitutam o( the action. Tlie plaintiff answered that the pretended -eltlenient was ille.'al and null, es|K'eially us to his attornevs, and had been ohlamed hy (raud, and with' the view ol delraudinj: plaintitrs attorneys out of tiieir costs. Issue having' been joined on this plea, judfjnient was rendered ..n tiie 28lli Febriiarv niai.itaininj: the plea of the derendants— y/,-/,/' 111 review, that Ihe jiidf^nient was in conlbrniilv with the jurisprudence of tiie courts as to the effect ot settleiiienis out of court, ami their binding operation upon the attorneys ati ^/(). Tlie parties belbre tiie case was returned into court came to u settlement, wiiich did not urovide (or tiie payment of tiie plaintitfs costs by tlie deleiidant, althougli tiie declaration prayed for distraction of costs— //eW, tiuit tlie plaintirt's attorney cou.d not continue tlie case for Ins costs. Carrier v. Cote, 6 Q. L. K. 297, S. C. R. 1880. II. Aftkb Desistement. 267. Wliere a party renounces his judgment after inscrintion in review lie is ixiund to pay costs. Ruhinson & Bowen, 2 L. N. 180, S. CAi. 1879. • This was the effect or tliis particular cage, but the BctuBl rule laid down apiwars to liave biwu that where Suwifl^.'"!.';,"'"'"""*'' t'yt'"'Pa»'e» In good taith the plalntm 8 attorneys could not continue the case for tlioir cont« ; Ijut if there w»« ba 1 faith and tlie settl, mont waK evidently made for the purpose (,f depriving the a tornev of his .u).t» the court might oriter that the d sconthiuftucn «hould be made aubjSjt to the psymer.t ot tlie cuatj. td. j^jiucm 2f.8 And wlicre tlie respondent had, afler the appeal taken, desisted from a part of tlie iudi;- meiitin his lavor, ami had .,(lere.l to pav the costs o( appeal up to the date of theVe.w.s'/e- //((■«?, and Ihe judgment w»s contirmed in accordance with the .lesisleinent, the appellant was condemned to pay the costs subsequent Q Ti 1879 ""' ^''''''''^' '" «• ^-^yS). III. Aga'^'st Cobpobation for Neglect op UOADS. 2()9. Where a corporation after conviction repairs the road coiii|ilained of, costs will not lie awarded in favor of the private prosecutor. h'eijina v. Corporation of' the Parish of St. Sani-eur, W Q. L. R. 283, Q. li. 1877. IV. Deposit for. 270. Since the jurisdiction of tiie Circuit Court in Qiielieu and Montreal has licen restricted to flOO, no deposit is required with preliminary pleas in that court. Kennedu & Mckinnon, 3 Q. L. R. 358, C. C. 1877. 271. The ani'iiiiit of deposit in review is regulated by the amount of plaintiff's demand, although the proceeding lie in compulsory liquidation . Eastwood v. Cotriveau, 3 L. N.8 B. C. R. 1879. ' V. Discretion of Court Concerning. 272. Where the Court of Review has merely refoi-med a judgment of the Superior Court by disallowing the condemnation for costs, tiie Court of Queen's Bench will not interfere with tlie ttiscretion as to costs thus exercised by tiie Court of Review. Bayard & Martin, 23 L.'C. J 211, Q. 11. 1878. VI. Distraction of. 273 Distraction of costs is equivalent to a trans(er duly sigiiilied,aiiv'~t class,, ,s,„s^ a '?"'''"'''" "^""'' '^V'. I\ Ukview. 2,S;i. Tlie Court of Rovievv will ,„,t ,■ " panics ,.oi„n,.r 10 ivctilvL I , "'"' f-''^'*" <-'fst3 l-sai,va,lvlie..Mr..otlM!ri;. :'^;''''-^^^^<^'. XVr. ./oin-tandSeverai, L,.i,j,,, 'IV KOIi. X. I.v Casks in Lvsoi.vencv. a,!;;!.)'!:";; ':r ;';;f;:;'"r r.p---'-' casc
    t ;"-e liable for the' Lsts abs, |,.,h7 ^TV'' l';^ve no nght to anne.x a cond ' ,''', "'"' "'«'r !>f .-Mch costs that the niom V I n " '""'^' '" the event of the Privy C,,,, ^' ''"""■"<"J special application to ap/eal a I ,1 ^''^''1''''- ** U^nj; reversed on suchapZ a w '''''H':'''''' ■J L- N. 412, S. C, 1880. '"' ''■ ^'^id, XIX. Of. XII. In Election Cases. P«rSw!?r^^;^J;Ij5[::'^^°- succeeds, each th-ieleiidant Huccii^Tiri: !.e^r*?:.?,<;r.r '-'' 8 bnngs an actio,, ea bonLe wl I? , " P-''^°° ''';>"a"" "'« order fjr,/;<,7., «< ,»•//,./„ 1^7;,,"^"" *^'''^'n aa c.^-;- he res,denc"of his clii. o '.riT'''' ""^'■- t" H.ive |,,n. e.xan.ned bv , ' ""'' '"*' opiioa P:-e, the co,i..~;;S,ri^ ":;--;. ^«uch ■u uie diligence 203 COSTS. COSTS. 204 1 ( i and rxppiipe of tlie party renuirina (lip intor- rov'iitdi-ifM. Kill).,- V. Laflcitr, I L. N, .(70, S. C. 187.S ; 22;i C. C. l>. i>^'.). Commitmmt viiiler Liccime fjnu\—Ou ii petition ti)i- /idhfd.t riir}mK--H,ht, tlml there was nu HMtiiuritv under the license law Ibr addinj; costs of coMiiniliiient ami coiivejunce to ;;a(i| to tiie other costs incurred on a" convi('tion for seiiin;: licpmr without license. Arcliambault ex/,., ;! L. N.rjO, Q, H. ISHO. 2110. Dilntiinj Except ion.— Ilehl—io uhide jhial issue where the security, etc., demanded hv it liuil lieen Hied lu'fore hearing of tlie exception. Martin v, Fdlcij, 2 L. N. 182. 2Stl. Tlie costs in dilatory exceptions call ini: for p iwer of attorney and security Hir costs from plaintiff must ahide tlie final judumeul in the cau.se. Si/mes el vir. v. Vtilimiii, 1 L. N . 61-,'. S. C. 1H7«. 2',)2. ("osts will he nwardele, par. ti.» Il>. " .■too. The plaintiff" sued the defendant, and his action was dismis.sed with costs. The defen- dant, on alfiilavit that the |)laintilf was .secreting his ellects, caused an exei;ution to issue before the expiration of fifteen davs from the date of judgment. The plaintill' opposed, c(nil'estin<' the truth of the facts allege,! in the affidavit? and prayini: that the seizure be annulled and set aside. The opposition was made and sworn at M()ntreal, where the pliiintitr resided, the Kli DecemlKT, 1878, iransmiticil to Three Kivers where an order suspending 11,0 execution was obtained and rcirislered in the prolhono- tary s liook there. It was then reluriieil to .Montreal to be served on the bailiff seizing, which was done al half-past eleven in the fore- noon of the 17th December, \X1H. Hnt half an hour previous to the .service of the opposi- tion thedefendant .served on the plaint iff oppo.«- ing notice of a desistemenl of Ins ,seizure. On the 24th December, the 15 days having expired, the defendant sued out a new execution. Jud<'- ment, maintaining an opposition to the secoinl .seizure, on the ground that the costs of the first opposition had not been jiaid before issuing tiie ,second, corifiriiied with costs, /kll & Riclcaby, 5 Q. L. H, 222. " '^'}^:^(f ("id Action where first f}ismiised.—A I)lamtiti who takes a new action after his fir.st is dismissed on a preliminarv plea, and who is stopped in his proceedings bv a motion on the part of the defendant, demanding that the costs 01 the first action be paid before he is allowed to proc-'ed, is not bound to notify the defendant that lie has paid the costs deimimied, but the costs of the motion I6r costs must al.so be paid bef.jre he can proceed. Laferriire & Fro- i-osf, 10 R. I.. 20, 1879. XX. On. 302. Amendment of Declaration.— "Where alter a verdict by a jury in his favor which had been set aside in apueal, and a new trial ordered, the plaintiff moved to amend the declaration —Held, that plaintiff' should pay costs of con- testation, including the jury trial. Holland v. ^tti^ens In.'iurance Co., 2 L. N. 180, .S. C. 179, .^0.{. C«r/(om/-),— The costs on a certiorari are i.i the discretion of the court. Lariolette exp. & Frudelk Cazelais, 3 L. N. 159, S. C. 1880. 3()4. The prosecutor cannot, on a petition for certiorari, be condemned to pay costs, unless he has been made a party to tli-j proceedings, McLaughlin exp., 3 L. N. 307, S. C. 1880. _ 4. Costs of canoelliiiK Imiothecs or; of establishing that they are extinguished required by"'la"w.''""' ""'"' '""' °' """""« ""^ '"^^"'o'y 6. Costs incurred citlier in the coun, below, or in appeal upon proceediups incidental to the seizure aid necessary toelfect the sales of the immoveables 7. Costs of suit as provided in Article 606. • The privileged claims upon immo\eablcs are herein, after enumerated and rank in the following order hi If J ?n ^ "'"^ !?'" '"'.""''""e incurred for the common luleiBSt of the cruOilors. awac. U, "wmuivi. 205 COSTS. cn"truin(,, .unci,., „ . w il^.'Vl.'" T'"'?' ';"• wl,„l,. „,t|, costs," in . I ' ,1 ''"' "'<■ c-MnMr,ncMain,.i:;:;i;'^J ;;;;;f:7''''.H"'i.H 1 I'. N. 102, Q B r,s77 '• ''"""l>-'<"ncxt,., MTvc.i. J!,.(;,i',. ii,„ i *•'"' 'i""i''* «^ "- appeale,] JTltjUnZ:^^':^'^ '"'''''"''l^^ recovered in an acri n I . ".','^'«'''> ''annot be paid under' "resell' XC v''^"/' "'""»"'' «• L. H. 19, S. C. 1876. ^'"/'W5, 3 XXII. PowKR OF Court with «k«abd to. dis'crltiJ'VtrCourf r'%''^ ^""'•^'^ '" the are specially provided '.t^r!''' '? '"*='' '=««<'« ^^^ Court of Queen'sBennl. =M- "*""^' "'"^ "'^ noM. ag:nc;'ai:uSu.rt'rw'i;!: th^'^'^'' ^r''' C08l.g y the inferior Vn .w T ".t"*^ "*^*''J of appellant may be condom^p/ '^"'P"'"f'J> tl'e appeal, thoudh the wt.^ to pay costs on the based on erroueof«''^i^ "''I" "PP«"*'e'l '''O'" was & 24 L. C. j" 1V2, q" B 1^80 '''^' ' ^■^- ''' XXIII, Privilege for. Y^Sl^fr^--' -tan execution which was inaiutained wirl, . " 'i^'P^'^'t'on costs certain -eal est„ip l J "'"• ^"'" t''<"«e 'vas brough to sale-lL / m'^""«> '° P''''"'i«' could not be colCL,ri^' ' ' '"*' "'^ opposant by privilege! a. d in llf "'"^ '^'*''' these costs a duly regis ered , " P t'^^'^«"'«e to the claim of S- C. R. I87T "''""'' •* ^- ^- K- 31G, 7'i'lt-''^'^.Se.;:,r:7t??;^^^^^ «.-i,i'^-'o i., r.tt2;:?'r,''''''''^' ■■■'''''"•• «;la.n. a-rainst tin . ' ""' ""I'I'I'^'nI's u parlv (o ,Mv.. s . n ' ' ' '"T'' "lonlcring i" this <.is, ' , '' , ^'''''•'•'gla, ,l,..Cn,un '"'t «.-l„„g S.C i'v (A" '''"^"j:r;">'"^'' ''OM, --iuM:;;'c.Snt:'FSt tpp'r''-- •-• '« ''I. Within tlu.,.. UK ;:,'';:■• (^.••l"'- '.n.st --nt;^::.;^ Ki:^^l,.;rd?^r" '> «'- -^::;:iSiat,:r-:;';:i^;--iri,:^u:^ compel llMMlel" 1/ r,^ 1^^^ """^'- ^''^'•«"'; '•7fEd;^n,::LKrinu.'-'---^^ will bo reiMiired to „|V;, "" P'o''"i'''e- he n.^!JwJir£;'^£;:iS;^^|or costs n,ust be tiun intervene, wlth'i t /da^'e";' ' ""•^■'*'^''- I^clarci l-e wa,s so Ue.U k-S '//''f 'V ''f ""'" 22 L, C. J. 78, 1877 ^'■'^'ielU McAHhur, a p!LonS;!snrur?'"P'»">'-'-''l.as in not bound to 'fve'c,.i,v .•'''"" °'' ^''^t""-'. Mutual /«.v«m«rcro'KT'r ^'''^''^ powe°r l"ltit:tT1^!' °" '-''•'■>■' «- eon.pany, plaiutitVun Ir such c^' '''"^ ''''« «l.ould give security, /ft" ri:!'ij'7;j'j;"«^''"«e« doiS-^;i"iJ^sT5?:s'^^'i;p-V "'-'«'' security for cosfs '\o. '^*^*'- l^ bound to give i« such under theln>" iTentS s7> '5ir' ■"" orf :.S^S;;j;::.'SS i-.K-er to 8hallj,,stify before the proThonoUrv ,7,1 "'!;"'' tnct, when the case auoeale i ft^^,^ -^ «'"" 'J''^- 324. A seaman of a foreign yeas;.! .^' '**'^' wageP., .^nd describing hiSL "if w'''" ""• now at Quebec," wi^ be comLleJ ^°'""»^. :iii 2(11 COSTS. COSTS. 2(18 ;!2.'). Tlie Court of Quccirn noncli tmnnot (■ntciiuiii a pi'tilioii In Imvc tlic Nccnntv (Idluicd insniticicnl, on llic uroiiml limt llit' rt •|10llcl('lll ImS lllSl'0\CICll, Hillcc tll('l'OIII|)lt'll;ed ;ii-olveiil. J/i/il, lliat peeiirilv eoiild iiul lie deiniuidtil Iroiii u ]iei-.soii who siiii|il_v Si ni:lil lo lieleiid iiiinsell, neither under Art. 21) ol the Code nor sec. .'('.) of the Insolvent Acl. Miiiiiis v. liiuilriir ^ Jirmlnii; 1 L. N'..V)I,S. C. l.><7f<. '.\'li*. iiiit u delendanl, wliii has liecouie an insolveiil under the liisolveiil Acl, eaiiiiot call on llie |>lainlill lo ileeiaie whether he admits or Contests an o|)jiosiiniii tilled liv hini lo the execu- tion ol a jud<;iiienl a>:ainsi iiiin, wiiliuiit giviiij; secuniv lor costs. lUtiitsnliil \ Jioiir i/uiii it ill., 1 L. N. o;VI, .V 22 1,. C. J. 227, S. C. 1^78. i(2'.l. A motion tor tlic proiiiiciion ol a power Ol atlornev, and lorsecuni_\ lor costs, caiinol he jiieseiilcii iiller the eximation of lour diivs Iroiii llie return ol the writ. ,)/(//e.v v. t^wiilr.s, 1 L. N. iJiiii, & 22 L. C. .1. 271, S. C. 187^. ;i;il). rnilir llie ciicninstunces disclosiii li\ (icleiiniiiit's motion, pluintiir held to j;ivc lui llier securil\ lor costs williont stavinj; Jiroceediii};--. JIaIr \' I'rici, 1 Q. I.. K. 2U7, X. C. 1878. li.ll. Ill cases under si.\tv dollars no dejHPSit is required willi preliiiiiiiiirv exceptions. Jjd ('iiiiijiiii/iiic irA.'2. I lie appellant, delemiant in the ciuiit lielow, appealing I'loiii a jiid<;iiieiit a^iaiiist hiiii 111 la\or ol the resjioiuleiil, «ho hail heconie in.-olvenl, moved that all )iroc<'ediiigs on Uie jiait of lespondeiit tie sUspemlcd until lie should na\e j;iven securitv lor costs or until his assi- L'liee sliniild have taken tip the instance, and in oeiaiill ol this that he (ajipellant) hepeiinuted to iiroceed (xpiirli — Jhld, (hat tlic appellant \va> not eiitilleil under si'C. 'M of the Insurance Act, l87o, to demand secuniv from an insol- vi-iit respondent, or to call ujioii the assignee to take up the instance ; and in aii_v Ciise such motion could not he enteilaiiied willioul notice thereof to the a,«sij;iiee. JlcKiiiiiifii A 'I'liomp- ,v„.., 1 1., N. 4>J-i, A 2;i L. C. J. ;ij, Q. \{. I,s7,s. 3.'{3. It is not eutlicient to entitle a delendHiit to securitv lor costs to allege that the plainiill has lett liis " iloiuicile,"' in the i'luvmce of yiiehec. I'l-riitiw v. T/ii' Grap/iic Ca., 1 L. X 484. &5r)5,iV: 22 L. C. J. 2t;8,S. U. 1.878; 2!) C. C. S.H. A motion lor security for cost.s cannot be made after the lour days liom the relurii of the wiil of frummous, even although iiulice ul such motion Iiuh iieen given within tlie four days. Siniiiil v. Cnrn'miii, 1 I,, N. l;to &. 22 !,.('. .1. r,:,, S. v.. 1878; .t ('r„irk-s/„i,ik- & Laroir :t ii. N .'I? ,V 21 L. C. J. C'.K V. C. 1879; &. Ailiiiii.i Si Mcliiljirf. .1 I,. N. ll.t, S. (!. 18811. .'I.'l"). A private lelter, whcndiy the signerrt hind and ohlige themselves joiiitiv and sever- ally In he respoiisihlc und to'pav t'lie tto-ls uml diiniages hIiicIi may he siillered 'by the respoii- ileiils, etc., is noi u compliance "with the In- .iniictiun Act ol 1878, winch provides thai a writ of injiinetion slniU not is-ue imliss the person applying lirst gives good and siillicieiit security in the inaniier prescribed by loid In the salisiiictiiiii of the court, or a judge llierenf. liiiiir,! iif Triiiporii/i/ii's nf the' l'n:dii//iri„///,■. 2 L. N. ,02, A- 2;i !-. C '.I 2'"» Q. I!. 18T8; tj. II Vic. cap. 1(, sec. 1. ;i.'il>. On a nioiinii lor secnriiv for costs umiei- the :i!llli sec, of the Insolveiil Act, ]X",— //,/,/, that as long as piaintiir was (piiescent he could not be Ibiced lo give secuniv. /Vrru v. /'(■//. 2 I.. N. 12;-), A 2.! I,. CI. 55,' S. ('. 1,87!). .'i:!7. ruder the In.solvent Act, 1 87!)- //<■/«/, that an in.solvenl. conlestinj; the coll,, chHoii of a creditor on his estate, was boiiml to give .security fur coMs. Girnii.s A h,i/,vow7, 2 1.. N. ,!22, A 2,! I,. C. .1. 2.s;i, .S. C. 1871). .').18. Security for costs, under the ordinary priicedure, may he denmniicd from a non-resi- dent who biing.s proceedings by injunction, not- willislaiiding ihat sticiiritv in piirsuinice of the iijiinclion Act, Q. -U Vk". cai.. U, sec. 4, has been already given. Ihiliir v. Hiiiin/ n/M,iii- il ..I 111,. I.i-^unuicc Ai'l.'lsT-, a,, ;i""rr'"' "u-, ,.1.1,1/ h.nii; liiidcr the tcniHdl'ili,. ri'ni.iilin.r \„, ,i ' XXV. 'I'axation' ok. •tf7. Aclillll 11)1- iJI II '(r I , $77 (|'( 11 ,. , •.111...). .Illi|;;i ,,. -.;moM of ,1,.. i,,ii or costs in,', ;; ; : con,..s u„oM ot tlu. o,,,,os„i„„, ,i,,u . u. cos s o 1,1 ,,. ,ax..,| .s i„ HM a|,p,.al.l,l,. ,. ..' *IIM', uiiil ii,il USUI iicas,.,,!*:? ,)■] r,. " .11;. 1 1,,. |.l,i,„t,tt i„.i,,,„„„| ,,„ ,^ ■, Sl,...O.H,„ „l,hm„.,|j,„m,„,.„i,i,s-..;i,7 |.: ,.;. tioii issii,.,i ,11 H.itisiii,:,,,,,, ,,r 111,, f,, I ;, ",'-", ^^ U C.J. 100, S.U. 1«78 ' ''^ •Mill, LIIC Dill Ijn^ IhH',1 fjlvnil r .... ■ i< (• na,,it,.n^^:;L:^^^ -a:-n::tS'i,i;'!i:;::.:-;;;f^/-'--./^'S o.\ * I.X^Iays eoiitiiiiiH tn riin imnn ^i,,, ■ . j , I'll "■ a .'Bluy oxDires nn ,. ? ■ V "t'''" "'"^ •'OHdays, "PP^o-sto all oiZ''L':^7n\%otl^,rI}''' """' ^"'" COTISATION. COUxYCIL OF THE BAR-Sec BAR. COUNSEL. I. Fees of, see ADVOCATES. COUNSEL AT ENqVETE-See PRO- CEDURE. Illll 211 COURTS. COUNTS. !• In Indiotmknt, .v,r CRIMINAL LAW. COUNTY C()UN( spc. ];!fi „( tlie Tns.Iv- e.,t Act ot 1875, in the I'ruviM..,. of Qml,,. means the SiiiHTior Court, un,l n(.t the iud-J sittiuf; in insolvency. Gatr & Sinclair k h'uy. niss,2\ L. C. J. 279, S. C. I.s77. ' n. POWKRS OK. .^.■J8._\\hereajuii);e in chnnilM.rs lm,I onlere,! a f'eijiu'.Hln, which order on a n;,„?e „fin ,r„„. pos,l,„„hW'A on the"''-' 2 r^. N.';i7s, Q. B. 1S7!). . .il>0. Ihe Court of Appeal has no power to issue an injunction restrainiii!; tlie Cilv of Montreal from proceedingto execute a judiiu'ient 01 the Recoriler's Court. M„//r/f,: v. Citi, of MotitmU, 2 L. N. :i79, Q. \i. 1870. '' "^ .■!t)l. The Court of Queen's Bench, sittin.' in ftlipeal 111 civil matters, has no power to entei- taiii an application for a chaiifre of venue in a cnininal matter. Comin e-rp., 2 L. N .SIM Q. B. 1879. ' 'M2. Under tlie Imp. Stat. 22-23 Vic cap (;;{,, n anv ca.se depending in any court within Her Majesty's Dominions, if ilie law applicahie to the tacts of the ease is the law adiinnistered in any other part of Her Majesty's Dominions, and is dillerent from the law 'of the place in which the court is situate, it is compe- tent to the court in which .such action is peiid- ing to direct a case to be prepared, showing the I facts and to be remitted for relerence to the CRIMINAL LAW. 019 Superior Court administ.Ting the law appjj. '•»l'l«' to the (acts of the case, ami desu „.' inci, court to pronounce its „pi„i„„ „,„,„ ,|i,M,„es. •tl2,S c'S" ^^^■'""/,2l L. C.J. .Iti'l. The Court of Review may send a .'ase l'"-'ktolh(. court l,el(w, in order that iIm. .,,■ mvul ^■,,i,i.lrf,,i,r,,uiy he deterred tn the phiintill 2;"7) B.'VsV/!''''''''''' ''"• * •'^'■''""'"y- '■ ''• N. .'tlil. The C,Mirl in .Montreal lias no |«,(ver to -ider that securities in another ,liMri,.| i,,,.,!,,. hclorelhe f'rot ,nn„ta,y of ,h,u district,' when •'illj">- Onapetiimn in,/,/,, «.,„•/•,.„/„ a-ainst ail aiderniaii, /„•/,/ tint the court coiiM ,.v.,,-i..e HsdiMU-etionas,,, .,.„„i,m the petition, even Ii'iIhwII, 22 L.C. .). 2S0,S. C. 1878. ' COUK'TS IhWVVWL-See MILITIA L.VW. COVENANTS. r. HiiKAOii OK, ,sw CONTRACrrs. CI! EDITORS. rxst?i!vKx;-Y' '""" '''"'■^''^^^ ^^''^' ^-^^ V. S.u.K IN Fu.ui) OK, see SALK. \ I. i«AxsKKKi.\FKAii)OK,.vte TRANSFER. CRIMINAL CONVICTION. L No Bar to Ua.maijks, .see DAMAGES. CRIMINAL LAW. I. AnnrcTiox. If. Arson, mc RAIL. III. Kaii,. IV. HlI.I. MAY IIK SEN-T HACK TO GrANI) Jury. V- CHAI.I.ENTiK. .-(c/cbsTC'^ "^' Prei.iminakv Examination, VII. Embezzlement. Vin. Error. IX. Evidence in Criminal Cases. A. False Pretences. XF. Iniikcent Assault. XII. Indictment. ^.^ AW. 212 213 K tin- liiw nppli- mill lies., n;;Hiicli I'l upon ihc iiiu'H- '""/, '^l I-. C.J. liiiiV scriil u I'liKo nlcr lliui rlic sn-- t'll li'llir phiiiilill. fcCoiihi/, ! I,. N. lias III) power to IT iliMricI jiisliiy il iliMrict,' wliiMi /■/(/(•;• V. Dilis/c, riirri'ii/d ii^iiinst ii'l I'liiiiii cxcntiHc Ih' priiiion, even kIiiiwii. /,',„/ V. 187H. ?ee MILITIA CRIMINAL LAW. CTS. :k, xee INSUR- .VK.NT Act, see V, see INSOL- l>isiiuiii"noN', ITION 1\ FltAlD Ai. eTllANSFEU. CTIOiN". IMAGES. Gkaxii .Jury. Examination', ES. AineitihiK'iil nf. DiU'ennl coiin/s /„, /'«;■ /iirniii/. For iiiii/,-iii',/ /a/s-r nhiniH. ^'l'>•nr;|l,■r| l„,,rnrhl,. r„r ,\,m;h,. t-n- oUy,,,,,,, xi,,,„il,ur h, r.it.s,: /,rr/ri,r r or per) II 11/. ' For sell in,', fire (o timber. Slijillllil of. xiir. .fiuY. XrV. /iAIKMCNY. XV. U\w.\.. XVI. Makinij Fai.sk Bank Statkmknth. Indictment for. XVf[. MANsi.u'iiiriKii. XV/Il. MlSTIMAI,. XfX. Nkw TitiAi,. XX. NirNANCK. X.\'l. I'ku.iiiiv. XXir. I'l.KA OK TiTI.K, Yvllr' '''■-'''•-'*''^" Ht<)i,k.v Good.s. A.\l V. ItKClllll) l.\. X.\'V. Rk.skuvki) Cask. XXVI. .Si'.MMAiiv Thiai AAVIII. JliiAI,. Bi.ir/i,iri/e of jury durinc/. xxr.x. N^AMK. X.V.V. Vkuim(!t. PEBT^v!^'" ^^""''"^'^"'' C0XVK«s,0N- OF I. ABDlrCTION. i'l. VI NO. I'llO MO. On un in,li<;ttnent lor al.,l,ictin<' a cirl 154. Q B 1877 ' ^"'"' ^- ^""*'«'' 21 1- C. J. in. Bail. pw!„ ^ .P"'''""'^'' '=o'"n'i»<''l. MAVI.KSKNTllA.KT0G„AN|,.ln,V. uSJtuT"^ I'V '"! "" '"'"'•""-It f;,r .!!.".';.",'.'"'""',"". '."Il-.""'l llie rrown e,„n,s,.| =;«; ;::*;;:./,„:7:v£ ■ i ; s V. CliAI.I.KXfu;. tl.fil;,.,'?",' r''"""-\ '^'"'"''1 challensre lioforc [lie jiin.r takes tlie hook in his hui,! I„. ,,. /;:;r:;^:!;:;itN:'!;:;r;i''B:t8r''-^'^- VII. Emhkzzi.k.mknt. 372. A clerk in a hank i.iav ho eonvielo,! of I'erson is p,!ovo.| to h. v 'e ,' t ' '"" i''"-''''' V. (.'lass, 1 L. N. 41, Q. J{. 1877. '■ '"'^"'" VIIF. EUROR. IX, EVIDEN-CE I.V CRLVIVAf. CasK.S. .•a;1™'ask''oi?r""''^ "" "" '"'■i'^t.nont for ii^^hor:t^,::ri:S'i"'"""r "'•'^"'"■'•' n.ilk-hoirse or G w I ', '?""« '"■"" "' "'« oi:i;^''t'tr^^-'''''"''-'^"-iy;: 1 e wi'tnoss ? •''■'"" '"."•''' '" '■'« 'li'^^'-etioM, oil I e quostion huf H*" ''"' ''^ "^'^ ''""■"' '" "'--e ;h?'iS^-'=.^"S;^u;f:i: I). M. and B Af m ' ' '^""^,P'w<'^:>"n.v) with if vo 1 Imvi I ^""^ P""™""^ ''^'''"-e alhiileilto) whir't o7; rdoin."'rw, "•'"' '"^'^''•^'"■'' '^"^' allow theVT^tioJ fj "'" '=°"''' ••^'"««1 'O tl.fprSn^r.tSrais^s,::;?/'?'''"'^''"'' Swpoul.iir,,!, "^'y, a-sistaiit po.stiim.sler at havi,.' '4, ?.„ -^^ "'? PO^t-'iaster; one for 1™L 3'^-is srr.Ti.^r's- 215 CHIMLNAL LAW. On 111- (n.il „n tl,(. first ..niu.s.. in.li.'l nts it us MH,.|,,|,v II,.. (',■,,»„,„ ,„-„v..,l,a.l„.l,u,| "Mf, ->,.. liiM jriiili 11, n ,..,nv..mitioi, hrUvcfii III"" nil. III.. |HW||liU-I.TUll.l ..III. Iliirv It «»H"'aiv.l llM.l 11,,. ..„„v,.,s„(i„„ |,a,| I llHMll II,.. ..|,ll...Z/l,.„|,.„t,u„,| llllil ,.,,„|i, I ,,, III.' iiii,ii..,M ,,r ii„. ti„.ri ,i,„i i;„.^,,,,v ,\, ,1,,, u',','r,'i "!• ' ''."."^■'•'•^'"i"". "11,1 i„ ,■.„,„„.,., i,,„ Ultll lll'lll'slMll,,,.,., ,|„.wil„,..MH,„|,„itt..,i||Hvi„„ " "'"'■'•I iiiliiiii.l,.,| t„t|,.. ,,ri..,„„.|. i|,a, |„, 1,11,1 ,"■"'■'• '•""Ij'.^H //W./, l|„ii ',.v„|,.,„.,. „it|„. ,.„„. ^L.-^. And Ji, 111.. M,„i,. case ninv pvulmco t,«'iii^',l,.,.„v,.r(.,|.u|i,.ri|„.n.(i,.,.„„,,n,,,-,|„. •,,,,, »vlii..|i. It In,,., „,.„l,| ..Htal,li-|, ,|„. ,,ri.,„„.,.\' mii...r.„.,..,n|„. ,|,..,-, a„,| fn,-;r..,.v ^. //,/,/,, |„„ 111.' JIII'V ,•,.1,1,1 „.,t |„. ,.,,Hi|,,| ,- „,p ,,^,, anil il.iil ili..„„lv i-<.n,..,lvw,,i,l,l l„. i„ ,|,s,.|„u'.n' li'Miiry, Mt ll„. insiai„.,.ollhf Crown, will, tf,,. Jiri.-uiii.,- ,M ciai.M.iit. Jli, (nilMTNAL I. AW. 216 X. F.VI.SK I'|1KTKN('K.S. 37!). OhMiiin,/ M„n,„ h;i.~Vr\Howr wan iiiti..!,.,! i,,r ,,|,tai„i,ijr |,„„„.v „,|,|,.,, ,1^1^,. Ifn.'.;.-. ||„. ,.vi,|,.„,.,. hI„,w..,I i|„ii 1„. |,a,| ohlimie. a.-l,..,|„,. „„,|„, |,a„|< „,|,| |,a,| ,.asl,..,l n— 11,1,1. ii,s„||i,.„.„t t,,H„ t,> t|,.. j„,.v on an ii,,!,..,,,,,.,,, against ti,<. ,l..ti.„,iaMi IbV oblninmjr „„„„.v l,y falso ,„■,.„.,„.,.«. /.•,.,//„„ Q. 1{ I'S""' '^ ''• ^- ■'• •'^^' * ' ^- ^<- "•''^"• XI. rNiiKi'KXT Ass.vrr.T. -'f^l. Tho |,i'is..„or was in.lictpil f,ir an in- -'"""''■■•"'' '■'"nl,.n.,lthe„„iic,. .";;'"";'"■" .'"''''i I'vsiriki,,^ om u.e wo,-,:.- lli'iih.-iii,i:iMi«tr..ss,,fan,i.. |„,,,,.„,^,„ 1,,,^ "'""''■',' """"■ ' ;V' nnknown." and hv a,l,hnL' "";!'"';"""";"-^'"n''"llnM,a, •Vin,.ent'' 111 the ihr,.. plac.M where the nam,. "Marie" '"•'•iir-. /!<■/■/, on a reserve.l cise, il,ai the I lei-ation or an„.n,|„„.„t was a,li„issil,le 2II», Q. If. 1,S7!). ' i^'-'-. ^-l-( . J. ;K-.. Altl„.iiKh in ^.-eneral it i.n „ot pern,itle,l !.'iiieliide„n,l,.r,|,II,.,.e„ih,.a,|.„r eoiinis of ,„ ii'ili'-lMient lwo,|,||e,,.„t (elo„ies. v,.t H .,,me "i I'liM. may he char^'...! in .hirei-ent wavs i„ '.lilh'n'ti. <;o,i„ts ol the same ii„lici„,ent. TU^n ''' li.'hrsteon.jt, th, ,.,,.„,,,, ,„ay i„. ,,.|,a,....,i will, hav,,,;; .<|„|,.„ „,„,„| l„.|„„yi„jr to A, a,,,!!,, an.,ll„.r w,th haying stolen uoo.ih,.!,,,,.,,,,, ,., . •■!«!!. lint an indietnient retnri„.,lhv the .-rand ,ini-yolone,listricl for a peijnrv coinmulTd in an..tl„.r ,li,siri,.t, wl,i,.|, ,|o..s not cm., am an Hlle-al,on thai (l,e,l,.f,.n,hu,t wasac,;,is,.,| hefoi'e '"■ ''';""■'',"!■ 'I"'ii>'l'i-tn.<'nt,orai';<.sledor.le- "'"«;. "Ill he ,,„asl,e,l, nor can ,s„eh in.liet- .iK'nt he ,',.m,.,i,e,l |,y amen,ln,e„t. /,-,.,»■„„ v. A.'/'"-/', 7 I{. h. ,-,.-,;!, Q. jj. iH7i;. •' om Tl' ;:"'''■'""■"" ''"-'''I on the UtI, .section ol.f A.i.{ Vie. ..ap. 22,' whieh does not e.,n- ta,„ the w.,r,l.s " so that the .san,e I,.. i„jn„.,l or . estrov...!, „,. „.o,.,|s ,.,p„val,.„i ,o {|,e„,, [^ |n..,i:,.la,-, ai-'a vei-,i,el rende,v,| on sn.^1, an ind.clment will he ipnished. I{,u,i„a v. Hhau, .■W. On an in.lictment for perjnrv. the CIV, I ,-„„.,„ whieh the p(>rj„rvwa.i el.ar^l to liHve hi.eii cmmitie,! was.lescrih..,! as Emilie Lanwurenx & l),„i,i L,;,nunK wlie.'e a- it sho„l,l have lK.en Di,H,r L;,i,„r,l. This error was twice repeate.i- //,././, s„l,iect to amen.lment. Ri'^jimi v. Leonard. :\ L. X. His, 3-!). The nroseciilion then hdvi^.I to he all.iweii to a.1,1 a nejjative amendment to corres- poii.I with the thinl answer assifr„e,l as fal.se- Jelt to cm.e with,,, any of the .stalute.s allowing amen.lments. Ih. •Whosoeyor unlawfully ,vnd mnli,.in„slv »,>U lire to iiiv Inrest Ir...., i„a,iumet„r...l I„i„l„.r, .-.iiiare t ,, b.^ ^,^„ ,*"1 '"■'""■'' '"" '■■'"■•I'lly lie',lr„r ,!,« i„„-,,o«. .,f• Clltf „K tnnber ,ir ..„ prival?,.r.MH!,ty,or on u„v creek all, to ',»',,''■'''''','■'''■''•,'■• JT'ii'tviif f.>l„nv,and shall be v.Lf ""f"!."'.''"""."^''" years, and n,it U'.ss thui, tw.) IZ'\Z '" ''".""I''-i«''"<"l i» any otl„.r gaol ,.r place ol hard lX','r o "r'"?. t<'rmles.sll,u„twu ye,„-8 without 217 CRIMINAL hWY. ■U(l. Till. |,niM(.,iiii„„ ,|„.„ ,„„^,,,,| . , r.;).r ..I |,„t „„, „„ „||,,j,,„i,.r,. ,}, ""*■''•■ '" •I'". In an uMk:i„i,.„t c.^ |i|„.| ',1,,.^,, .._ only II ycticrii a (M-aiii,„ ti,,,, u ' I •, ^ '"''•' <:■'. iV I y. li. |{. 12(,, .ill:!. /•'../• L,n.-n,i/.-l„ ail ii„li.:|„H.„t for a H HUlu.,.„> ,,. H.iy „y-» //,. ..,,, w„|„ ,;,':„ .'„ .ill! ll,..,,ns,„„,.. who |,H,| |„,,.„ ,;,i«|,i,,r „,■ "';»2 |i «■.., „i i.„.,i„.i. „ri,T II,,. ..,,1, ... ,1 ■' •v.-p.'cti„« .l,..allim.s„C tl„. 1„„<' is ;-' '"---''■y to. all.... ,i,H, ,i„. ,•..„„.:,■, o«...s,.„o,,..,,Mre,l bylaw to b.. ,„a,l.' \ v tl il fill' siat.'iiu.iit ,1. .sjiuw,, t„ |„. ,„\J' on.;.,l tl,.. ,,a,t„.,la,-.s all'),V.,l. /J ""^ •;;''^- Ad.I It iH „„t „e(H.s>ai.v to ulle.re i„ the ^vllll int.'Mt to ilecoive i.r iiii.slead. /i. n.aki'Jsio ;''■";'"■'■'''■ '" "" i"Ji«tnient tor M.iKiiic ,al>e liank retiirnM, t is mit np,.ps«Rru 'i'l.i ..pplies to t ,(. imrtioular l,u„k i„ qm.stion C. 32.3a \-ic. cap.^, sec. 25. "°^ '"' ""' J"'"*'"''- «ll, 1 '■ ''■",'.'"• '''"'"'•""• ''"1^"' «l»l'M,..nt« '■'••''' '''I''Nr..-,,,-,|,(|,.r-,.Mt,.,.,ir,ls,,(', I,,, .a,,,,. "ll-'Mv... I.,it cnii-liliit.. .,„ly.,n.•.,lH.„.l...„„l„ne '•"||'|l ..( III.. oll.MI,.... II,. ,„,'"'■ ^'"'' '- " ' '■«-'»'-.v t>, H,.t ,„it that the n MS a,„l Hla„.„„.„lH .v..r..t.. ll... l.,„„„.i..„ n. V -^ ''""' '■•■''■'•'■'■•I t..i„ 11... A. I, //, Ml.. .Nor iH ,1 i,..,.,.MHHrv I., al|..,r,. that t|,p ;;';;"•;••":;"",",""'. i" 11,.' i„.i„.i, rt w,xm ,,..„„. ""'■'''" """''■"n..|. //....tioit. L.r,:i. ■ '•' .N'T that il„.r,.K,. ,.,.,„,■„ Hot up WMover |,iili||.h-..| .,r mail,. |iiil,|i,., //, ' l||'. >j';r that tl,..,l,.(i.,„la„t. w,.,.,. ,|i,..,o,„rH ■m. Fnr'K.fihrf l„ I'rorhU for 1(7/,. ,/,.,_ ,"".',"':l."'"-'.<'."' <•!■ a.'„iMlia„,| i'.„. ,„.„|„..„„„ to '"vi.l.. hi,^ w,(.. with i,..,;pHHary 1 1 ,t,„| ..|,7th- -. , mn.it ,.,..r,.MMu.v to all...-. lhanl..|i.,Mlant thcr,,a„sa,„l,- ahlP t„ ,,r„vi,l,. s,„.h HkkI '' l';tn,,t'.-i..rll,altl,,. ,,,..|..,:t „„ 1 1,., part ""';'"',"")-' l'"i;.'"!! Xi!,nnl„ro l„, r„h, Vre- .^I'Yi ■■' lin„-l, ln|-l,avi„. i„i|„..,.,l,livfH|.,.„,i,l a |„,.„„Hs,iry „„l,. lor$l7l).l,'i, km.I ,„.iv,.,l to s;;:;:'ih:n^'«"T''' '''"''''•• '''''-'''-'^^'i''^ "Ml.'-ty. et..., ,,,.r, hat ,1,0 saiil •,.,:: . hoHaiv;,:,;'^ ,^, ,. . ;"■ ''"'":>-»■'■' ""(-' int.. „„.„..v. Mo? Q H. J8H(); ^^ ^'''"'""^ """<■'"'•' "• 'i- '^- 1'^;^, the Cr.,;v,';',' ,'■ """7" ""I""''''"" ""' '-"•'"""'"'at '■Mora hi' r'''',''"' -•'■''■•'-•■•"'■">-' H'O alt.,r„oy f-'iiiral hail roln.Mo.l lo tun, nI, to i,riso,„.r tho l"J>;no„laiH of the lal.o pret.n..'o "l „n e J l^'^v'l. .leman.l,.,!. wa« alio rof,,«.,l. //"" * »«r,1. Ii,.mtlc ,r' I ' n,*^^:"'*,-!'''"'"' "" "•'"•. '^''H'l. n„.l wirhm t la.vf" *oxc«8o n.f, '','!,'' '"■ '"^''"P• """'""y. th<. san,.., or ,ml wf^oJ f,,' m , ^ "V"?'"'"" ''' I'"'"'l8 cap 20 s„V."25.""" ""• »"'""" ""1 labor. C\ 32-3.3 Vlo! Po'r,^n'"Sraryti;""nX!" ^^'■''"■'"r '"J,-" ""v other lnfl„co,s .u,y^,| „ ,f,fr.o' »„ f''""f"'P»tly caases or p,>dors..orrfestr.l tliillinv •"'"'""". '"nl^e. aceopt, «.c„n-,y or ,0 "?r hnn;!'."" "" V".' .'"'""y valuable co.„„rt„er-I,ip .' ho "a" C f aZ "rP"^' """ »' verted l„toor,,e"l or, "eaitwIMfn^^ '*','"??•' '"■ '^<"'- i« Ka.lltv „f a n,isde,nPa,mr, a,r«har^"l«H'™';'''l^^ "prisoned in the po„i,entiarv (,,r «n?' L^''^.^'^. ° ^ ;n.^i:s.n[i;„r^.he^'^r';.,^ r^ r^^^ f'lr any term less than two year" w?h or «m ''?'''."''"} ill eRIM. VAL LAW. /"/• /n-jur,/^ \„ ii„|i(itin->iit for por- «""•«■■ n In H..,lwl.i..|,,', H,-tirnt,. the, ...rjiirv, ;r '^'mr^.Ti;;^:"""- ''"'"'" ' '^"""'' " /-''' '• nn ""lictmnnt for perjury, allarcHo «* . J „,.„ „ „r e,| ,„ ,i ..ortuM, ,.»„He'- ,vluTe- " Ci.I r.'",' '"■".■•''"'• "'■ ""• tnlVMsl.i,, of ,. ,,, '^,V> ' '" "','• *'N'r.ct of ArtlmhuHku, trH;i,.r, J r :'■''''''"''" ""' ""•i^'Hiori of ncr.ls w,n &t, l' "T ''''''<=.'-il."i"" of tU plaiM.ir 41. llHMm.ixHion in an imlirtmcnl for per- t M , '"'' l"'''.li"-v IS asHisrn(Kl in-" l)i,| you not rnak,. a liar^'ain witli plainlilf to Imv tl.urp,-o,K.rty?" an.l wIkm. tl„. ,,,..1 -e a 'or n,ent,sn.a,.Mvhe..asin,n.,lHlu..Vi!rTl.::;,^^ J^iMU ,a,| ..nt.M-..,| into an a-ronncnt with naid 411. Far. t. /tin,/ fin- to /im/n:~T\w pri-oner Wr,^.|„, |,.|onioiH|y. nnlawfnilyan.l nnilicio,,-lv Inn Jr " •'.^^l''"'" ;i"aiitity of nninnfactur..;! iiniher tovvit, Ihrc.. llioir-an.] -l.injrlcs and ninc- ron piles on,oar,IV- MoMon ,7, .plaHl 'e ml.;n,i.nt,ontl,o^-roumlthutit,li.lnolallp.',. dm tlic HKIinjr hro was done '• so as to inin^r ord,.,str„v"the lun.l«r in qne.t,o,/in u' ! |! ance w,t|, ||„. tornis of h,..:. 11 of;i'-,!:i Vi,' can. 22. t Pn- n,ii/m it wan urjred that if tl,',. "idu'lnKMit were in.suttieient -mder He(^ 11 it was van! under .ec. 21, wi.iel ikes | e feltinir (ire to " any stack of corn » • • anv steer or pile of woodorUrk" a felon v- /A/7 (hat ^ "•"■'• -•''•V'Ppli*'.lonly,ounn,ann,atne a e ,nd,c,,nen., bein^- insufHcieut, must 1,; 1880 •'""" ^' '"' •' '^- ^' 2''tJ. Q 13. 8ol!!.?t' ''^■'""'"■''i '^"T'r '"'"'■"^•^' S*'""'*' or en i *.■'■' ';''•'*'•"">• '''•-«'''<' <" 'Counsel prose, cutin^' lor die Crown the authority veaied in form of the statute, i„,tead nf t m word "'^•' a»L ni tollie (iiHliiK of the , .^.Pt, ■. ' ^ .5 ^"H'P'"!'""' CRIMINAL LAW. 220 ccr iin l;''ic<'s. /{,.„„„ v. .•(/>,•„/,„«,./ 2i l-.(...f,,)2.,,.fel Q. H. IM2(;, Q It. isso.' M/','i;,ei'? "'" ""'•'■.-'".'O' that an indiWnu.nt , ;:r of ,1 r '■"■'""' ••'"■! '"• *"'?■' ' ''*• '!'« H oi the (Town, as Ijie sigtuitnre of the .ii:ney general, signed hy his suhslilule, s q! iT.'7h75 '"'" '• '^'""'•"''' ^ "• ''• ^". XIII. JUBV. ni On ft trial for a felony the jury cannot Ije allow»| ,„ s..,.,rate during the progress f e trial, and where sH 'h separalion 'takes ph.c' t IS a mistrial, and the court niav direct that ihe party convicted he tried airain, as ii no trial I I ^ C. cap. 77, s, «:(,& 32 & ;(.( Vic. cap. 21), sec! XrV. Lakckny. ■11-. Prisoner was indictp.l for Ptealinir "a i!% ',7 •"' payment of and of the value oT «!!.)H..1.1, the property of A. .Mc \- V. \l , and jned and convicfe,! at the March term f I ' ucens tench, Montreal, 1877. The cvidei • showed that the promissonarv note in one tin was , raw,, l.y A. Mc. &(\ K., an I „ a, ■ payalde to prisoner's order. The note .vas.he, Kiv ei; J, n„s,aket,. pris.mer, it hein;; s,ippo.ed t'." W,e sun, of $2,y'^.:i:i W.IS due 1^1,, v the •Iniwers instead of the less sun, of SI 7,-,. ' T e ,„s take henij; immediately di.scovered prisoner save hack the note to the drawers unilami,,.| a,,d iiuendorsedjn excl,an,-eforai,o,her noTof »l.J. An opportuiuty occurring; Ihe prisoner alterwards.onthesaiuedav, stole the „o e e t CO Meet It. Alter conviction the ibHowi,,,' (Yie.^t,ons were reserved for the conside.-ation oj' •^^e lull court: Whether an unstamped p.'ni t I'idc Supra uol». qile.'-t,c tl,e ful seeu'^rltv .'\.?. ^T'^r'^'Y "Otp" oV valu.thle security; and whether, m the hands of the drawers, it wa., such properly as to he he snhject of iarceny-//eM, in ap,H.al ,, | e t>uprenie Court, reversing th- '' ,d.',„ent of he Queen's Hench (21 L. C J. ii ,) ,ha , ri -ner i^n,-,,,nl,.voflarcenyof« a ^ore '■'',," wii laole secunty w,thin the in, ,,.•■,., o, .l,e Statute, and that the oHence .,i wl.i. h' hJ was ?.>,lly was not correctly descrihe, "'he Su Cri879. "" * ^''^'"''' 2 S- C. Kej,. m, 41(i. On an indictment for havinjj unlawfullv 221 CniMINAL LAW. tr;!,::;;;;;r;;;i:;;n'::;;:*::'i;»s S::t;;S;;;;^;;UI;rv;;!::;~;,;,:e A'V. JjiiKi,. 417 On BM indictmoMt (or liU'l tlie cniirf rof„-Ml t., H,t„„t ,1„. ,.vi,K.,...r. ..m i, „. h , ," ' •fl ■ II. II .■ Nil,,,., ciisi. ivhcrc ll,,.,-.. wrts „„|v 4I'J. Nor wan nn anieii,li„(.,it (o that pfTi.-t allow..,l ,.„,Jer,S2 & 3;i Vic. cu,,. 29. «ec. 70.--/6 ATI. Maklvo Fai.8k Hank Statkmknt.^. ^.-fv/^/a V. l>,„iuet, 2 L. X. in. (I It, lS7y '• XVII. Manslatohtkii. 421. Prisoner waH in.lieUM (i.r nia„sln„,H,t(..- aciii„i, HO ax to di.nriVl. ».,;, f.'"^"'""'!' '" '"SHi'Mim,, i>r ii, boncliciaf interest , 8ucKnn.!t.. F <"*"y"'"iit of «iiy which .uch other poVonnilZ-M''' '"" V '" '''l»i'y. larcciy ; and ll' t f „«f..^ i T' maiiiior an ^Imnlp I Puidshpd by Im. ri»o,t,np^^^^ ni«d,.m,.H,>(.r shall b,. I ten., „„t excwd i'b ,irL„ S„yf f*",""»"«'-y lor ai,y which simple larc "ny "ii^^wI^Kr^."'" 'V.?"y ",""'""'• '•' any per«oirf„r larceny l,re,..h^ll . '." "'V'"' "■'»' "t IxKby false pretence/ he'j ,;''""„''*; "-"„7 f^'' "<"«ln- person is not guilty of t » ..in.np f i 'P'" on that such "lent, but are 0.' ,^,|"Y rt , ,H ^''r-;;'' '", »'" i"'""'- "Rainst ttiis sectio , tl eVi Ll HnH h^"'"^ "^ !"' """""oe "tall be Uable tVC , , „Tsle7»^Kl''l'" '" «!']"}'• «'"» ''o b«.l beeu convicted o an ,!dlonn,M?t I!„Ph'"' o"''" "■' '^ ''« and !nf,:,y ca.se in wlilel. «n„ i ' under th,s section; offi'uce ..-ainst t » Act hS '^ ^Z'"'l. '" convicted of an oblalnl,,.i by false nrHe.ieML''^ "tealiuK, embezaliug or if the vafneVl'^Ihe^", *i'A't- b^.t'e^'Sw?'."'''^*''.:;"'-' ''""' CRIMINAT- LAW. 222 ''nl.v""'o.'''"''" "'" •!'">■ '"""'' " V<'f'li'' "f r s fli,, , V " T"'""' "'""-/'"''/. lUt .leatl, XVIII. MlHTKIAl,. . ■'^-' "'" a trial for forL'prv Ihc mr,cl of t«>t;k '1 ',,;'"'" "'■'"" '""' "'-''•■'•I <',.,i,M., Tho nan.Pol |{.,U.rl (Jnu.t w,,s ,.,|le,i „ , t e l-HMPl an otte of the j„ry. «,„| u,,,,,, , ^' ^, , \'^ HHori, a. |{„|„,rt (,|'.,>,I witl,o„i ,.|,alle, The m.l l.\ i„isiulv,. Hi.sHer.s t.. the „„„; • „f he per „„ who Herve,! o„ the jury-//,//, a XIX. Nkw Tuiai.. 42.t. On a motion for „ new trial from u co, Y<:tio„(orperjNr,— //,/,/. that the (rial will, , :':,;:7,' "l".''/"V'^*'"(e„cei.lu.„,|er..,|,a>,lv "«s„„„ wl.ieh has an-e„ on (he (rial" .loes not i,ea.«sanl.v mean a .jMesdon ,hat was 1-1. 'V'l.l where, on a reserve,!. ;ase,ti,p Court Qm...n.s lte„,.|. ,. 1,1, „,e convict'itM, (oTo "'I, ami the ,,i„.slioM hits heen reserve,! whether .•v(r,ais|,o„|,l he jr,.an(nl, a new tria n,ay '0 'niere,! in eiisps of ,nis,len„.a„or uii.lerO. I i-L.cap. 77, .see. 58, ,ss. 2.t The authority fel*3'l','r"r,?i'lj; '""''"'" ''"" '"^n convicted of any tr,.,v«n„ tiin«orti,ne.sn ho court rhillrt'l^l,'" "P^"" "' ■""•''' JudKinent of tho Jid Court of Q,,e, ,. s Ben ,' ',T '" '^ at some other criminal t^.i-r St th74?d , • *''\'"' 'i'oreou otuyui a„d Terminer orOimriors^ •'iirf or rtessioa meat has before thyttm'';b^J»^%,f-»f <'''"■![ "." J"?": Queen s Bench is iirt«fi...,t>,. .*■.'"" ''*"' < ourtof ^ justice roqulre7''iKc°y"^:t'-" "'"^^ """'^ "^""^ .1 ^; «?. 223 CRIMINAL LAW. toniakefnr. onl.T as justice mi.iiros •' i,,- c M.hn^MlR. ri^'lit to onlor a new trial when, i„ n'/'M'iTir" /// " *"'""''' ''"" '""''■*'-''* ^''■.i"^'i':e -12-). Awl a tioneral vonlicton (wo connfs for pennrvwas //rW to I.e l,a.l. anci a new trial ordeie.l, where the assijitmient otperinrv in the sec.m. eonntwa^ .lefeetivein setting' m> part onlv nf what the,h.|i.n,lar,t .-ai.l. and onntfin.r a q-iahlvnur statement, an, I the evi.ience on The lirst eouMt was so contraiJietory as to leave roonilor .lonl.t whether the jnrv won],] have fonn.l a veivlict ofc.iltv on that connt if it had Pto<„l alone; and this notwithstan.iinj: the faet that It the first count had stood alone the ver- (liet e,,nld not have heen tonolied. //> ' ■12(1 Where no new trial is a-ked fiir in a re- Pervei) case the court will n,it order a new trial Q?Tm "'''"'''' ^ ^- ^- '*^'' * ^^ ^- ^- -^-^ i"- XX. Nl'ISAXCE. 427. On an indiettnent for moorina a raft in tliecilmnnelofthe River Ottawa, therebv pre. veMting the cotM|,lainant and tl,e pnhlic'.'elier- ally troni navijratinsr the river— //,-/./, that the obstruction constituted a public nuisance, and as such was imnishable as a niisdenu-anor. Jii't/nia V. Kerr, :! L. X. 121, Q. B. 1880. XXI. Pekji'ry. 428. On a reserved case from the <)islrict of Hedlord It appeare.l that the defendant was in- dicted lor perjury, committed in the course of ade|x)sition commenced before a jud"ewho took notes, aixi afterwards continued under u ddlerentsypteni before the prothouofarv onlv- fJeM, that tlie deposition was illejral, as not'be- ing m conformitv with 2(!4 C. C. P. or 284 f! 1870^'"''^''"'' ^'■''■^■^'"'7 li.L. 574, Q.B.' 429. Perjury cannot be assigned upon a de- position taken under Art. 284 C. C. P. wliere tliecon.sent in writing required by that' article has '►et-n omitted. Ifegina v. Martin, 21 L. C.J. ■iJo* t^, n. IH77. 480. Defendant was indicted for perlurv in a deposition taken in a civil suit in the' Superior Court. The deposition purported to have been Mar'-KT^'T ■■• •""''!'• "^"•""''o'.on the 2nd Ma\ , lH7b. 1 lie deposition m fact was be^un ou that day, adjourned to the tliird of May, and CRIMINAL LAW. 224 clo,sed on the 8th May. The allejrcd perjury "■as contained in the e.xumination-in-chief .vken on the 2nd May, and it was proved that llie.iath was taken at enquete .sittings bv the pro hoiiofary, there l,eing no consent in writin-' hat the enquete should be taken otherwise than by a judge taking notes, ft was contended o he deence that the prothoimlary had no autliority to administer the oath without a cou- s<'nt in writing under Art. 281 of the Code of Procedure.' For the pro-ecntion it was con- tended that the Act of 1870 Ci.'i Vic. cap. IS, sec. 2)t covered the case, aii.l that there was a Hiibse,,uei,tcoMseut_/M/, that in a contested case an empieteat lengil, under the old system re,ii.ired a consent in writing, and that without siieh consent the oath was only a voluntary one, on which perjury could not be assil«e I" "nable to attend court on the day fixed for takniR proofs the protbonotarv mav Sow'ri'oTrhe 'hld'^"'"' '" ""•"' «»-^" h« excrclsesTll'^h^ K;^eiji^er^"?,fr%:ri^li^,3^^^ XX IL Pi.K.v OK Title. u ff- ^y '•^'^- ^^ •'*■' ^'c- cap. 22, sec. 2G, " \n Act respecting malicious injuries to property " It IS provided that " who.soever unlawfully and maliciou.s|y cuts any tree, the injurV ^^ lone being to the amount of twenty-five .ients ^^ at tiie least, shall on conviction thereof, before any justice of the peace, at the .liscretion of the justice, either be committed to Uie cnn- num gaol or house of correction, there to he inpn.soned only, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard ahor, for any tern, not e.xceeding one mouth, orel.se shall forfeit and pav, over _^ and above the amount of the injury done, ^ such Slim of money, not e.xceeding five d.d- lars, as to the justice seems meet. In answer to a charge under this section the defendant s-et up and showtnl a bona fide claim of title- JleOl, tliat the jurisdiotiou of justices of the * See supra. t ACT TO FACILITATE THK TAKI.VQ OP EVIDE.VOE IN CIVIL CASES. 240' 2S'2W?'yS''9Ji'*'Si!^?,L'''''P''°''«'''»9 "f Arts. 2:19, nvnPrn.?^;i,fi'?*f' ^^'\^^ «'"' "''»"'■ 'be Code of m si's in c^ r^^^^ ^."""''" "" -l«l'o8iti""» of wit- rcukt'oim n, f""'"'" "^"P"."'"' •'»'"■' '"■ '«'<"'•«' the c. ns nt of .1 ^ ^','>'' '■''*'";;'" ^''''""" «"»"8, and also hy teild' « .- ""■ '? '"' "' "'«'■• "ttorneys as re^a.ds a la 1 V n L e n ^ ^^ '■•"•", •'" ^'7 "'"«« "f the proceedings. av *af ; r h,H '"'y J""'''™' -I'ly, In or out'of term, am KerfH,.,li ,*'.'''','.'"' '"-' ""'"•" '" before a coramis. o .p, "'" ^"'I'erior tour-. with refroacHvl.""n.''Vl"' •','''';«»'"'' "««"'"' s'"*"' aPPly i.,..'".' '.*.^"*^'''-!'™t «" all deposltlonH «lre.„lv tnllcn anv iiui'ffment"A'; "*'' ''."'' """".""t '" Hny manner ellect ceeiuiigs bad or to bo hud in virtue of such judgmei t. LAW. 224 225 CRIMINAL LAW. "lie allpjrcij ppi-jiirv 'xamination-in-oliier it WHS proved tliiil leto .sittings l)y I lie acdiisont in wrilliij; le tiikon (ithcnvisc >. Ft was (loiitinidcd (itliiiiioiiu'v hiiii IK) mill widioiit 11 coii- 28t of [he C,.,l(. of ciition it wiiH cdii- I (■'!■'! Vic. cap. 1-1, id tliat there was a that ill a contested dcr the old system ;, and that without only a voluntary not lie assigned"; he waived so as to lit pi'oceedini;.N of porjnry wliich was IS taken. Reiiina 1870. isiiig out of a con- li{' evidence of the depositicn— y/r-W, not lie convicted ,!irapher, decause hv the accused, crly convicted on ler i;iven li-oin his sed said, and this irregularities in Li'oiianl, 3 L. N. 22, sec. 26, " An iriesto properly" pver unlawfully tree, tlie injury Iwentv-live cents m thereof, helore the discretion of itted to the coin- tion, there to he jrisoned and kept n not e-xceediiig 'it and pay, over ilie injury iloiie, ceeding five dol- neet. In answer in the defendant claim of title— ■ justices of the OP EVIDENCE IN isionsof Arts. 219, •lb iif the OikIo of ile|i08iti(iii.s of wit- ourt or before tho 1 cases, mill also by orneys as re«aiiJs )f tlio proceeiiiiiKs, ir out of torin, iiiul ) before a coraniia- 'ection shall apply )I18 AJriMily tiikim any manner ellect lered, or any pro- such Judgment, p ace to liear and determine (he c)iarr'e in a ...iirnary way was ons.ed, the procee.imls "e '■i>.' "iider a criminal statute, ,nd tiie TlinJ y i-Tt i.;i,Q.'s.';87u*"^""' " '''^''•'"'' ' XXJII. Kkceivixg Sioi.K.v Goods. I.l.i. Prisoner was indicted and tried at (inirler Sessions for having received sMe M'-In Knowing them to he stolen. The ev ;"-• "as ,o the effect tliat the goods in ,-" '"" li»ving l.een niisseci from the premises of a larmer o, St. Hnhe,,, near Montrea 'a searc], f:^;7li:!;;:.;Tif-r^;,:dst;ri= ;;■;•;•> .^ome of tiiem in the .sfahle ui , .some o ' t concealed III the cellar o. the prJier's | ;;;.;;;^-,heconsta,.iesa;:r;,i;;;SY::ri!-;i tdse.ir h thepiemi.ses, was ol.serve,! to wmk ■ oil'' ..( his men III a siispieious ma ner -& u' "XT'";, ,:r ■''''''"■■''-"- "'----: me' or ,, 'T r"'''"""' "" i'"'"^"Ment (or r re in'/ ■' '''"' T"'''^'"'' '"' ""''^"Ment for CRIML\AL LAW. 226 f^,fV'"a V. Lemietix, 6 Q. L. K. 2(;i, S. C. XXVII. Takino and A..,.,.yino. and aiinTv'in.Prr*'"' "'*''' '"'"'^•«' <'^'' '"'<"'S pcrty.that tl Its pro- XXVIII. Thi.u,. 10. luashed. j; ag^avaled assault CO, ittUdthl^ll.J'^ J^^.J' lone of r"" ^' " ""■'"I'erto the Donm oil' mmmm or ivcolvInK »t 'u • 2,', 'h'o'''^' ^^ '"I-" pretence.., 01 tlio j.roperly 1 Iuk ■ ' ,, V. v .''"' '".T "' ""^^ '^""1' ll't' m-.v without a vei lie L ,''"'"""" '^' XXIX. Vkntk. n.'i?'cii;^i^'::;^:«?';:"i«--.>'i'-ppeai "lanslau-hler reieei. i>|dicimeiit (or ago .Iocs not, i„ lliV':,,iM,, ' ", "\',"'''" >-'l''l'', "'llo.so tourieeii years, ..ucl, a^s. it L-l ' •'5''' ''''''■• '■•^'^'«1 cai,ii.)t, in 11,0 opinio,, oi' t J nmr si,, , .""""" »""'" puni..lie,l by a sunnnnry coin ,'' iff, ' ■ '"^ .'^"'li'^a'ntly any other Act, an, SasM ,,n r ""'"'"'' '"'" """or i a-Kaniliiig in hi.'op,",^i ,f 'u ,' a«Zl'f",Mi"'''"^'' ""' commit rajie ; or, (,',) Vni, UnliVl .f„ ,. *'"' '"'''»' ti> ■"ole«l,.,l oV l:inci;..v 1 ,,y n^iSr b! ;;a^ "''»t,ncted, or olhcer of cu8lon,8 or exci"H,. o '„^ '"'.I''' ''""Stable avvlnl performunco of li s dutv ,', rvi^ T'V'"'"-''''' '" "'<> the jierlonoance thereof ; or ^.rnVbi'V, ''''"' '"I'l-ent an inniftte or liabitnal , rem! ,,..^' i''-' '''"«,.'''■ '"'i"*,' I'ouse, house ol lll-farne' or b,^ y^ou 'e ""^ "'^-''I'rly «.t^'i.;a3f;ir;,Z;.(;^£'te^'-'-'''^^ way. (J, ;u.33 yje. cap. a2 ioc ^ '^''^'^B" '" a summary i« Jte;,i;-,-^';^«f«.^be;on; Whom „„y „„«„„ summar ly u„d,.r the provl .ns f.l n, ' f "' l'"' ''■'«« trate, aljer asci'rtaini ,g ,| t' , ,^t , ,„:i" ' "'"•■'' ""'«'^- Charge, but before the (rmi I .v ,,,,,', •''''''■''^ """o iie«..,..s for the prosecution ,rtY'i .'.'•'" "'" ""- party charged for any si te,'„ f , .' [ ' .^"""'X "" the make, shall slate to »u •!, . m . ,, ' ''" ""iy"i-hto >^'.ar«e against hi... and' ,'',," ,r!,',"i.'"""'™ "'' "'« obtained or n.ceivtd do s not i„ Vl "','"',"• ''"'"oz/led, niiijiistrnte, exce..l t,'ii ,l„ |,?Il ' "'" J"''Kn.<'"t of the ntt-inptcd toconmit laVnv Jn,;,'iLi-' """ ""*'"*! «"y othe/,,er,^ m " ler wltror^'rr;^ 'l"""'"'« "l'"» instrument, any grievous 1» ,1 Ik L*'"""". " "fapon or »ad n.uliclou./e«JrC,:taVn'iu^X"r;ffi >\ iiaiilv wioioiit t;. ""l""o that accuseul shall then ^ay u, In i th .1 '" ?'""*"■•'" '" the the like ellVcl : •• vi y„" '",,'"'," ". "' '"■ Words to , .iKa.i.st you shall be l.ii.d v n , i '"" "'^' ''''arge I u shall be sen, for ,r „ III TCvtW'' *'"""•" "'at person charged coiisenls iiJt >\1 . "' ,* • "nd ii tho I ily tried aiiJdetur,ni„',I,j ""'("•" '!"'«" ■'i^''"'? «"'»>nar- I '"oni;isi»t,aietotryitUoes,,A;iM,','.T'' ""' Po'veiof k:.o'wru^s-i,i'iiK £?^?''^- 'K^ Lfe'-mBs a.i,'-}a 227 CUOWN LANDS. XXX. Verdict. 411. The (l.'ffiidant was indiofed for that she, being inir.treHH oraueitaiii Kirlcallcil Marie, lier servant, her maiden name lieing unknown, of the ii-e of eiglii years,, li,| unhiwfiilly and mali- ciously I (> gi-ievoiis U«iilv harm to tiie waid Mane, wiiereby the health of the said Marie was permanently injmeil. At the trial the indict- ment waH amended hv omitting the wonls ' then being mistre.sH of" and " her servant, her maiden name heiiig nnkiiown," and by addin" after the name ".Marie" the name of " Vin" cent" in the three places wiiere the .anie _ Wane occurs. The trial proceeded on the indictment so amended, and the prisoner was tound guilty of conmioii a.ssaiilt— 7/,-/,/, o,, a reserved case, liiat the linding was legal. Jieniiia Q. B im''' ^ ^'' ^"^^ ^^^' '^ ^'^ ^- ^ '^•"^^"' XXXI. WuoxGi.'iL Conversion ok Pro- PEUTV. 442. Indictment under 32-33 Vic. c. 21, s. 78 which is as lollows;—" whosoever being en- '' trusted, either solely or jointly, with any other ^" i)ersoii with any pnwer af attorney for the mile " or transfer of any propn-t;/, fraudulently sells ^^ or traihslens, or otiierwise converts the" same or any part thereof, to his own use or benefit, ^^' or to the use or benelit of any person other than the person by whom lie wiis .so intrusted, " IS guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be ^ liable to any of the punishments which ' the court may award as heieiubefbre last ' mentioned "—Held, that the power of attorney in said section mentioned must be a written puwer of attorney, and oral testimony of a verbal power of attorney will not bring the'defendaiit's act within the scope of that statute. Jieqina v. Uwuinard, 4 Q. L. R. 220, Q. B. 1874. CURE CURATOKSHIP. 228 CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. I. Agreements to Procure the Witii- URAWAL OF, Illeoal, See CONTllACTS. I. Ct'KATOR. Connot /'iirehase Property of which he is Curd lor. Mnsl he resilient in the Provinee. II. I'oWKU OK (JlKATRl.X. III. Power oK JiuuE IX Ai'i'oi.NTiNCi. - I. ClKATOR. 444. Cannot l\irchase Property to which he is t («■(//(»■— The parties were the co-heirs of the late 1<. U., who, dying, bequeathed his projjerty to his chilth-en, with substitution to his grand- children. The principal delendant was ap- pointed a curator, and, being authorized to sell a property belonging to the succession by licita- tion, the other defendant became the ad judica- iHire. On proof that he was only aprSle-nom for the curator, the latter condemned to abandon anil render an account. Benoil & Bcnoit, 8 K. L. 425, Q. H. 187(i. 44."). Must be resident in the Province.— Kci\on en deslitiition de curatelle by tlie daughter of ill! interdicted person, setting out that the cura- tor resided in the Province of Ontario; that plaintiff was dependent on her father, and was unable to coni|xd the defendant to contribute thereto Pleattiathe was known to be living in Ontario at the time of his appointment, and, moreover, that plaiiititt' had since married, and was not now dependent on her father for sup- port. Demurrer to plea maintained. Leijne v. Leijye, & Simpson, 3 L. N. 100, & 24 L. C. J. 83, S. C. 1880. II, Power of Cdratrix. CROPS. r. Damages for Destruction of, bv Fire see DAMAGES. CROWN. I. Exevpt from Court House Tax. II. Injunction does not Lie Against lei- INJUNCTION. ^vGAiNST, see 443. Proceedings on behalf of the Crown are exempt from myi ng stamps, Ostell & Blake, 22 Li. L. J. 17, Q. B. 1877. CROWN LANDS. I, Privileges of Settlebs on, aec EXECU- TION exemptions. 446. Wiiere a wife was sued in her quality of curatrix to her husband, who was interdicted on an obligation given Ijy her in order to secure the rent of the house in which she lived— i/eW, the obligation was null and void, as a curatrix could not mortgage without authorization of justice. Hhort v. Kelly, 2 L. N. 284, S. C. 1879. III. Power of Judge in Appointing a Cur- ator. 447. On a demand by appellant to be ap- pointed curator to his son interdicted for imbeci- lity— //eW, that in making such appointment thejud^e was not obliged to follow the wishes of the majority of the relations and friends con- vened, their advice being but for the information and assistance of the judge in the performance of his duties, and in such case the father of the interdict has a right to be appointed curator in preference to a stranger. Dufaux & Robillard, 7 U. L. 471, Q. B. 1876. CURfi. T./;,'','^*^"^'^'*'''^"''' ^^ AT Elections, see ELECTION LAW. ' II. KiuuTs AND Powers of, see CEMETE- KIES. 229 CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES. CURRENCY. I. Loss Valued in i" lS"\d not at the S'nt u ,^''r''''''l' """^""t at tl,(. rale as on tl ■. nfo V • V^clianj;,., |,„t CUSTOMARY DOWER-,SVe BOWER. CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES. Sale op Goons by. CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES. 230 r.!''"'':t to the 'r ;^ " "arehonse, The warehcse, na^ ,'„^ 1 ,"" , ,.""I'^";"-T. aii'itliemiivhiJ', ,. ""■^'' '." ii<'liver llieiii u-ithe^:;;^,!:^,, :;S:i!2;;^;f';?r''''r i" 'lie e Mst,„nl v^ 1 "II- Bou.Im l,a.l not been t" ti. .-; e , h i';.;T '"■• "'""""' p-'^'vious tosell (roods hel.l „1 '^''t'- '»> ^'cs. M aii.l (iO, arrival o( tin. imporlinff vrss.fmnV'!"."'' '"''^ ""<''' "'' VL'sscI .,f„„e liuiicirerl tnn« In 111, '«"""'' in il (IrekeJ t«M;nty.(b„r lion » «n ^ar v .^''f ?r "•""" *"'«". «i"'i» make d,i„ <.„try iriivnnls ot « '"^ '"iP'.rtinK vessel, eaiiie; u,i I „very im wr ,.r nr „ ' ''".'"'." "'"' 1""" tlic than on,, hundred tons burtipn ,J h l' "V", "'•*"'■' ■<>«« Willi, niter the imp? "fati" , ' f „, nh ,? '"i"* "'""' f""''- same to tlie propi.r ,,f icer ami n^l, f""'"' P''"''"''' "'" 2. Thonersons enteriiK aTv ^n ^I''"" ''Ty "'"«»•■• liver to the collector or V.TIib^.,,?''' '""■"■•''* shull de- entry fh,u-..,,f ii'such f'r n as X'lTh"' °'"""!' " ^'"^ "^ •' « pe «it authority, fai Iv wriffp ! app" nted by com- written an,l part y "r , fed a, d 1 T ','!''".''"'• "■• '"'Iv the name of tlio Imj orter an 1 i • U,''P'!'^''!'P' "-'ontai'iing uame or the vessel {.ndo7tl^afcrf''4;TacJ'J an.l the marks and i/brs a ,'?:":''''.'''' "' ""' »-'""''8 a^es and the place Ir.iwhM, ,?'',''' '" ""^ l''"^k. and of what J„unfry ..r pke 's ,, L,f '?''" '"'", i"'l'orted, I 1'ro.luce or nianulacrure- and- *'""'" '"''' ""' ""■"Wth. .." by Y]:ri::r;^::;!'i:::;''j".,i'« warehouses m ,he „,a„. lime pay dowi,';;i| duiie.i u 'S'ln "'""'i' "* ""• ^-""^ wants, and the collect, r or otlie^im, '*""i''' '■""■'"'' >"- mciiaiely tiiereiipi.i, Vram h s w'/^r / V'"',*;" ^''■'" >■"- of 8U,.h Koods, anil sraiit a nermhiwi ,',*"'' ""' ""''"iinK |;be_sai„e further uho CuX^;^^'';;^!;;;;:;^'^-- J on.ie'^^^t';:ay;',?^,,t'.'.'rduT;' '?,"*",r^ "™"-"on I "-aiV "-nvey the «,;!,,d, „ the i^u,t ,,? .""'^'T "' """'"ms I to be kept at the risk and charV^rn;"M "'"''■''""'"'■ ""■''f' «u,.h goods he „„t ,luly eiitemiV '" "'""■'< ■''"'' »" warehousing uithln one mom lW,m ,i,'"''i"V"'''' <"■ <■'"• beliiR so conveyed to tl, e , , . '"' '^"•'^ "' t'ler charges of removal and uVrri."""" warehouse, and timeofsu,.|i elllry,7iVJ^■i^"TJf'|^''"|yp»idat,lle auc ion to the hi^t^st bidiler a, I h^ ''"'* ''>' l"'''"« 'il'Pliccl first t„ tlie iiavn 1,.. t ^r h >•'"' •'■''"■''"In th,Teof tn.ovcr plus, ila„\? , fer d°«char,^!n"„ o''' '''''''■«<^^''' ""'l "liall be pahl to th,. owner o/A .^*' P """ ^'-^cl's lien, aKent, p.'.vi,le,l » ways thurin ias^e"?;'" '"■ ^" *>'« 'a^f" 8" d for a Bum sufliei,., t " ,av n,e H .'."/""'"."""""t be oH.'rcd for sale for h,,i„ 1 ' ^ 'he duties and cliiirges if olllTcl for sa e loi . Z^laHo,""'''","" "■" "'« ''barges f troyed,aii,l any g,,Z^ *&,»"'''' f"o?» ►hall bf de- entry thereof and warnuitfoM„d[„J''','''n'*. '"•'■"■•« "loe and any person cone," e.i in ?» n I''""' '"' forleited, c-ealing goods so laud^:! 'Ll^C^^J^:^^^ POINTING A Cur- D. S U M M A K Y F T I T L E S. Pmsk DAMAOKS 2:i:! DEATH '"' 2.|!( DKMATS DM OOMI'TK ' .] 2,-,o DKUKX I URlvS ', 2,-,() DKBT 25(1 DKCISOIIY OATH .!... 2M) DKCI.AKATION i-,u DKCLAUATIUN OV HYI'OTIIEC. . . . . •!;,() DKDKWTION DKKDS DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER...! DEKAUI/r DEFA IT'I' CACHft '. DEFENSE E\ FAIT DEI'ENSE EN DROIT DEFICIENCY .",.. DEFKICllEl'RS 250 LT.I 2r>i •A") I 2,V2 2") 2 2:)2 '.7 2-)7 DEC V I'.Rl'ISSEMENT 2C,2 DEEAKSSEMENT .' 2-.2 DELAY 2;V2 DELE(iATIOX '. 2;-)2 DEEIRIl'M TREMENS 252 DELIVERY 252 DELIVERY ORDER 25,! DEMAND OF PAYMENT 25:i DEM LI" RE 25,! DEM V RR AGE 251! DEM U RRER 254 DENTISTRY 254 DEI'OSrr 254 DEPOSITIONS 25(; DEPPTY PROTHONOTARY 25(i DERNIER EQUIPEUR 250 DESAVEP 250 DESCRIPTION 25G DESERTION 25(i DESISTEMENT 25G Paoe DESTFTtlTfON .5,; DETERIORATION " 2:,,; DIFFERENCE IN VALI'E ...' ' •'!-,(; DILATORY EXCEPTION ' ." r,7 DIMINl'TIOX.... .,-,7 DIRECTORS ..','.'!."!!.. 257 DISA VOW A L '. ' ' .)'-,7 DISCIIARfH-; .' ."r,7 DISCIPLIXE DISCONTI N LTANCE DISCUSSION ]]"".. ..51, DISHONESTY '.'.".*..' ")Vs DISSENTIENTS [.. ...'.'.".""..'." 2'5.S DISTINCTION OF THINGS..'.'!,'." ^'^ DISTRIIJUTION ' 2'-,8 DISTRICT MAGISTRATIiS. ..'.!'. ".!!!' 2()0 DIVIDENDS 2t!l DIVINE WORSHIP .'.'.'.'.' .>,;i DOCUMENTS '" w,;i '»^>'' '..'.'.'.'.::.::. i^u DOMAINE PUHLIQUE ■)(;! DOMICILE 2(;i DOMINION PARLIAMENT.'...'. -'ci DONATION ■ .,,j9 DOUHLE WINDOWS '.'.'.'...". 271 DOWER 271 1 )RAF TS ..'.'.".'.'.' " " •>7-! DRAINS [ r,^') DRINlv 'm DROIT D'ACCES '..."." 27S DROIT DE PASSAGE .....*.'.." 27;t DROIT DE RETENTION 274 DROIT DE SUITE [[ 274 DUES ..'..'!.'.".".'!! 274 DUNKIN ACT [ ' " 274 DUTY .".■ 274 233 DAMAGPIS. DAMAGES. I Action bv Insolvent for. U- AlUINST. O/iTj/i/mrir Enijiloyer. Lc.i.siir. J/ini/a/inl Curj>„ra(i„n. I iii/nindii. h'liilicai/x. ! STAThMKNT OP. i V . I'dn. Arridi'itin. A.'omull. Breach of Conlriirt. Jhmch „f Crniiinl to Sell. , J>ii!llt of Hclatifc. I'l/iiiihitliiii of C/idnirter D'.'^tnirtion of Crop h,j Fire. Nu£::::r""" "J' "^""^ "« '^« orounaio/ Fids,- Arrest. Fiihe liiipri.fonmeHt. Jl/e'r„ to Horses: Lihel ii„ J'leddiiiys. Molirious I'ro.seaition. I isoiKil Injury. Vl. Mk'ASI'UK ok, Tiol'^' ^"'' "'""'" "'' C">MiNAr, Coxv.c. vVn.' ^'"'^^''"•"'"n of% -vet- PHESCKJP- DENCK.""''"" "'' I-'^"^'=«"««ATOBiE.s, see EVI- A. KiciT OK Heirs to Action kor. VI \'';^'"*'*^f'^« «t' Claim kor. TION: •" ^*"^'"'>i"^''S «ee PKESCItlP. NiiuLxc"'"' ''"'''' "^ -ONTR.B.TORV AIV. Will not lie for Wrong Judgment. DAMAGES. 1. Action by In.solvent for. inth!ZfV''\'"'^'''*- "^^^ '"■« discharge from L. N 250, & y u. L. 557^ s.|-. iKfy^'"'"'^' ^ jl. tlergymen — An iiclioii ,,f ,J,iiiia''cs ivrlll Je against a pHe.st lb. dWamutorv Cl^ .Uered .1 hmployer.-'l\'o tlio..«a,„j do!!.!,-. ia,„ uneieu lu ihe employ of deleudaut while 2.34 hlaf'ting, the accident havin.' I,f.,.n pn„„„ , , , ..«.■ 01 a H„.,.l drill (..vpr..sHir I .r' • fyr""" l.e dc..n,si.n of tin. courts l„. ,,''.' ,' '■•:'"« vuH n.,t M.ch an inl..rl..r.n • ^i, ' vitiidc iiii.lt.r the Frcnrl, I,. ," "'■'■- pt..uUM.xpn,,,rnuionH.;st;iei ihe Miiiiiir .(;• „/' If / , , . "^ '""I"' Act. J- .c. ,).! i'.; c? r.^.f ""■''"' -^ ^>«»"«-''/, 22 '■• 'J'lic Corporation oC .Montreal i» i;„i 1 • daina-es cansci by the l,a.| .t u, ,■ " ''' '" i;;i>i-iootpuths,^,,;'::;l;""^;;^-'-nhe "iurket, winch hrol c an . j,' :'",'""-"" "'« '"•^'S ".flictin. i.unrics or I, d, ir '" ""-' ""« •'■■oi.-ht. It''u,,pour." tat," I '";'"•'" charge walked over the tna k... '''^ '" generally several ,in,es , "r| t L''"'"', ''"•^•• and no apparent.leCec. e.vistH ft 1 1"'/, ''""^" question, hman after-e.xa.ninal on 1 ' T ,'" plank tohaveheend. „",".'"■""" .Miowed thy W-/,,hat,ho,Xtco; lalMo';''''''^'•'''■'''''- ;;;'eo.,,lneto,he';:SS::;iir^:;:-t .i.at, , he occu;;^;nc;"w;"'pL;;;r'r '"'•;'•''' 'or winch the defendants ere no'tin ''''■''' negligence having been nroved ".''"'''^ "o 'U^. U,e action w^,ln.,:Cd,i.«:^r'i-|y. thegi;;:::srzt;si:;':,p';]"''^'''o„ «l'ip ha,i onened a pi.l lie • r I ,\ "^ ^"■"- property and" had not ' le .J it | "'""p;'' '"''' cattletos.rayont. hisla,,d '£:J!,^^ "'"•■•'•d.on the ground that hy hv,.' ''''-'" »ot hound tolence any front m. 7 "'■''« opened and that, c,H.feiM,tirtl "'"'•''' ""'^ ground of action-//,./,/,' ..i:;;", «'"■' J'" "lent of th. court below, that the ^, ., ' '''"'«" not he M.nnssed 0,1 d.,^ ,t IrZ'r't Corpvrulioii of Towii'^hl,, , /'t., ;""""" »t ^■fi. 471, Q. ii. IS7H. ^ "-^ ^tanbridje, 1 J Aclion ol daiiiaL'eiicllmii hiumI to rccdvcr d «'iiii,-c(l l.v liir ii|.i-, clih-.ii' hiH slcif-li ill Tlic luiinp's ti'vvnslii|) III A t(i I'll,! flil. Wlllill illi'jldl was iliK Jili'iiiliil Mint |iliiiiiii|| sliilc (if llic mini. Dilri lllllllls tunc, mill .1 "UN itildxiciiicd at conlnlmli'il i,, tlic iiccKlcnt. Tli "US cMilrncf iliiit the ruinl VMis in II vciv liuil <•'"" ilKin.un.l iil.s,, tliiit lli(> pliiiniitr liad' (Iniikiii;;, liut iionr lliiit ihc mfidcMl was (tiic III uiiv wav 1. 1 lli(. pjiiiiilill's (^(iiiililiiiii //,/,/,— Jf'hK Hint tl IP corporation wiih not JiaMc lor ilaina^'cN occasional liy ||„. coii>lnicl necessary works, wlicri or rcsiilliiifr ||.,,,|| III,, ,1,11 in a street where no dm iiei'l ion ol /;'/'7"/A- The City „f M„hI,;„1, W |' Q. li. IKSO l.'lij;encc appears, o make a drain e.viHted. prev lolisly N. :m. iicainsi the City of Alonlreal reversiiiji conlii nil Jinljlliienl of Courl of Key n;j llial ol Superior Court |ilainliir.'t;L'0() daiiiiii:es. M„it ■,r r, 'li/i iif .I.SC../, 2 !,. N. lew , aiio winch j;ave ( '(iiinirii/iiiii !>. II. Where ll drivinj; aloiu' C ;v, g, i{. plaiiilill's raiir street, in the Cilv of Ajonl- ik tion lor a new tunnel owini; to a recent e.Ncava- an injiiiy received hy a liiil oi hllll COKllil house oldiie I was the jiarli lor , ,- rh>- IIh. ion ol the sidewalk opposite the "li(|, theeorpoialioii contended, parly liiilile under ihi city— //,/,/, that tl ■y-laws ol the mhic to piuilillll', hill (hey had I'poralion wii.-. pri 11.^ I hey h;id (|( ii<:ainsf ndu; iiiaril^ no rijiht lo cal tilled, ami llieh lilivilii; or.-e ran iumiv heen caielcHnly and i njiiied Itself so Ihal il had to he kiilcil //,/,/, that ij,,. i;it was lialde,and that wilho^il (h slate ol tl Allllillllhllllll -peeml notice ol V. ('ill/ III' Mi'iilniil, ■> Iv. \. Ill, S. C, A- S. C. U. I rj. i'hunliir siieil for *!S.(MII) ailcL'cd to h lieeii sniiered llllll, OWIIlir t precipilalcd into an excavati o Ills Inn III!; heen to imlemnily Ijn (iilliiuiiiv .V Cihi of Miiiilrial, k < riiil \ Liinm,-, ;( !„ .\ . 4(|(; s. C, meni would corporalion, '■/// ll/' Miiiit- I'/iy. mill A pi l^s(l. lysician is nil'; Ihe malady of li liulient in an aclmn ii;;ainst liini lor'le iimhec will he presnined hy the pnhlicaho, '■L'\ /•,•,- '■ ^■~^~' '^- ■• ^i- '- "• •■^•'1 ,.V II U I iTit, (I I!. Is::) at iHLihl in Sherhi Monti lid liavinu- heel street, in 111 \vliile driving' he city of I. in eoiiseiineiKte, severely injiired. It was proved that the nijrlit was very ilark and tlie excavation was iinl'ciuH'd. ll WHS al-o proved that plainlitrwas driving; very la>t,,so as lo hiive heen iinahle to cheek ' -T-e in time— //,/,/, that h li'iiilir ll/.S -\Vh ere the jnred hy hemj; knocked down hy a I idainliir was in- iliil c walkiiijioii ll ocoiiioiivo then ic railway track near a cr 'OH.S- i lodipalh near hy which In mi^'lil have riached llie cro.ssiii" J /lilt, mill ■ "^ iliiiij motion lor 111 nalelv conlnlinicd and could iiot'i '■y his nejilifi- 11 new trial, he had • iiled to tlie aecidcni. and J.iicl^/iiir.tt S. C lad colli ri- coiilij not recover. v. City i.f Muiitniit, 2 1.. \. 27.S, lot l:i. l{e-pondent was tlie owner ot a lions laiiil on l.c.ieiine street, in llie cilv of Tl Kivers, and clii that city ^\:1W ihii (he level of tie iiiieil irom the corporation of niij:es lor the ilestriieli on cil 1.. N. hiiitiraii ( '( lit. Tl Grand 'J'riink' I diimaj;es caused I ((•//,. ence lo tl accHleiil, (//(. V. a III ml '/luiitc r), S. C. K. i.sT'J. corporation ol Tinj;wick sued t C le reason of Miiil on their Imeover a lit y a hridf;e which they had li Tl tier ivercallei le diiiiiaj;e complained of il'i lirid;; y the swelhn,!; of ihe'river in c wan lo a oiiKinj; to the plaintills, ami was cuii.sci onscipience of Ihe conslniclion of the giuhe.', M po.-ite Ins properly l.y tiiua iV: Dccidenlal It (l< leiiilant-, the cilv, inlieal, Ol- pleas if III' generiu ileneiiation included a deninrrcr ami ll lem lo halile 'J' le hnpenor Court held ami ili.-inis>eil their jihas ; ll tl t lit, in appeal - y/(7(/, inainlainii, ■;ioiiiids ol d'tiiurrer, lliiil the piaintill- had noiccour.eiijrainsi the iininieipalilv lordama' es d lo hi- properly liy allera'iions in The street niaile hv I a railway cumi'iiny iiiilliori/.ed //(■M. Ihal the plaintills were deft mlanis h cnlilled to daiiiaL'c.s, incliidim' 'll rehiiilili daniaj;c> m IC costs ul ale ol Ihe action. (, Iheir hridjie, hut, only incliidin cd within a year jirevioii.s to tli'i iller Gniiut Trunk Raitiniij C 111, g. H. 1S77. iii/iiinitiiiH iij' Tiiii/ivicL- k i'JC'aiiiiilu,:i g. L. K :iO. Wheret criviiij; coiisKh.rablc mcoi lepiainlill, who wiisan archilecl. praclice, was very acciihnt wliici y law to construct siudi worl |ilaiiiliir had siitlercd loss or dan ol'siuh nlleiat railway and if tl hy reasi urns ins recourse «as Uf;aiii,st || ipaiiy, and not atrainst llieeorpi... tioii which had no control over the companv in the constnieiion < I works iiiiihorizeil hy fu ilelendai.is rail lie from his hiisini seriously injiireil hy an 'iiiL' on the I occurred while Iravell uccidenl miyht have been iiv (liirin;; a Ireshet, ami wh laiiv < iirpunitiiiii III' T/iiii J\ K. L. ;Hjy, g. u. i.smi. \ ( \ii-irs \ /Miiiliiit, 111 r/ionitiiiii Jiicirx Ai l.rKsiiril, 10 1{. L. .J4I, g. j^, i^, U. I'l of ilonir ;/■ T/in ■0. or. iifilil action lor dam; the level ol the street iiiiaiiist 111,, eih- caiisei hv li IC raising 111 the Iroiil of I n.- ^leriy in .-a.d city— //c/i/. that iiotwillisianili'Ii 'r the iiiunicipalit was authorized hv the Icislir verdict ol sc! vaiils liail si avoided if tli lown j;realer dili!;ence i-i,(i(l() damii'^eM was rendered the delenil.iiii.s, and tins ver Liinitila'ii iV Suitt/i J-Jaxti'i-n J> llil', 1'. C. ISf^O. ii;.'ainst dii 1 was siisiaiiied. aitir "J Ci L.N. \VI a rail ic value of cattle kil way wa.s sued in dan ihat they were liabl ed on the loi m;:eK tor ■J /lid, Ihe delect I ve state ol the I e lor accidents occasioned I jiiovcil that the Ciiitntl r, eiices, allhoii.rh it was (lail hcloiiired to iiiioiher Cc ;i't», g. JJ. l.sTU iinmt a: Vi'. Co. V. I'aquettc, 2 L. N tuie lo do sii that II was 'leverlheless liable tor damages caused thereby. (, City iij Moiilitiit, ;! L. N. 51, Q. li. Ksm).' Kail 1" an aoliun again.-t the Grand 'J'l miur "ay lor liaviii'' lieeii sirii liy a I oconiotivo 11 c Classing llie track in the city of xMoiitrcal 10. Action ol ilamaaes tion ullejied to liavt ,cs against a cilv eor |ior- ol water lodgiiij; aroumi leen occasioned by a (!, ud lluekiml, £ —llilit. ihat the proof of I'liri ol dcfemlant.s should h negligence on llii .1 ll appellant 's huusc— I S. C. 18H0. Oittt V. (J. T.Ii'y. Q le most pusi- ., ;< L. N. ys, 237 J)AMAGK.S. c..iiMiiiH.sin,„.rH oC Si,.. M.itl,, ; 1 ' :S::.^:;;i;:;,:v!-i,=;iSi;= ari iK'iiim iv I heir un,.,... " I"'"' ''''''. "ii tiw- .Ulan, .f,'; :",'"::":;'''';''-'•''' •••■'-v.-r DAMAOKS. 238 il . aiiKu,.,, |„nv<.ver, wus never ,l,.|ivnv,| '. ,i finite,,, , li.il^'ol the iiiiHuci — //,/,/ L. ». Viu, ",■' t™ " ' '•*•»'■«/''■ '■".. :i "■as,M Hi.cl, l,a,l onlerli L I, ""•"" l'l'"-<' 0-. one ,s„le MM o t V, ! , . '''''/■'"r"' ,'^""'^" lil. I)KTAII,li|) StaTK.MKNT OF. IV. J-'oii, i p:;:s:»;sc;re::;:d liNll, iii.r." r,,| 'i.. , ,1 ' " .,"y " ''••('■(•live i'^-iH,,,!.;,!,;,!,,,'' . i;,,' ,"" ••'•".ovin^^ t|,e -^i;\f 'f^:./;;..s:o;tvy,r"'"^"« «'-"• ' a;'%lr ;- ;;r'::;, '''-''-'^^ llijiirieM wliiel, I,, rl„. . . ' ' . reueivcii ''-.-«,,,::!:;,j:;,,::;: ; ;--;_^- I..UI '''•","""• "•'- wuH ,l,e„ a IHWH Jen, '1' "'" iiif;l"o , aiMl when near /I,, • ""-«.,- i'-vn.,,coMa,„ a;;,iV:.,;r !;':;;'■«'• ll'"l li' on Ills lieii.l IV,, '^""',">,a HoliieniiL' ;'-iaH,.aHr;,.';V 'l;:/■v:.::^''•'''■'J- '''-l-'^MlIenn. M H ,e i:""" 'l'"' ? ^■■••"t «"->^' llu-u,„), .. .," r'. ' .'"V""" '"• ''^» Hanres he liniM.'lif .,,,„„, ' <;in;iiin- "I- ''-I th;:;i','i;',r :;;!''«t5!;-''i'.:n,o,er 'jans Hn,l rhai, he was n , IC ) T "'■,""'" "•" " Hp,,eare,l iha,, the w rk, • I 1' ""•■•''-'•. ;j-|.dMso to i.l'^-r'rer'ni;!;V'-' liii- .Man ua.'. in the en,,,l„v , 1 the ei '""• N" priraiili(,n8 had heen ,■[{■„ ''''l^'ii'laNl,. oidc.nt, either hy 'peV ,,,,.. ^"■■'•■'" '"'- l«vssfr,.-l,y that Work „nh,M la . ',,- el "'"'" l.T wa.s go,,,, on uhove -//,./,/ ,7 . "'"""*•- "•antofm-ecai.tinnon the , • , ' , '■''■'' ""** a-i.he,!,,,i«,,,e,,t„.hi'h\ ,;!^:;;,;'';<-'f-.t, ■*l. II"' plaint, fltt,„|,|elen,h,„t»ee'l„„l <• ihumIktoC |,e,,s,,n,s ,eti,,'nn,,r l. , ""' "' "■ '""^pa.'.o.'\he,,u,.;:h'':sXv'T',r''" vvorkn,;: lo;,'ether. F^nr of the ,I:^,-u ' '"'■'! f,'Mi,>-, one of the four he, mr ., ' - V^'"'''"''' ar.cMM.,.o>.c,,,.i,,eSvi,ie.hh ltr.uth,''''''l'''''«. tlu' road, and preoarii,.' to . ', , ■""'^' "' uforn,,! bringing hin,,uoe'£:t:S, V r'" * an,, vvhosegun was accide,,lal'ds", a ,',''''''!, the. Hhot iodgod ,n ,,h.i„„,rs lig 'f:','.*i"^ «liot, whicii were I, r.'e dnek ., . ^' "'« le(tl..g,a„d/br,y-,i';''ente ,^S;;"V^*'^ fUteen dayn, accofding to the ev,de Ice^?""!?^ doctors, he nulfered lerribi>- an I ! ''* ""^ losing hi. leg by the natiuul : ren.Vth'-;:;"^' con.stiti.tion. Proved tl,at he won ,7 ,, "" tor the re«t of his Itfe-iieW, th^ ,',l'.u'4 t^e' 239 PAMAGKS. DAMAdKS. 240 tlimiiiircN would iMMnvnnlcl I'or siilll'iiiiu' iih well n- lor iirtiml I..NS, mill jiiil>,'innit tor $urt uimI n.sls. I'r/lr/inJv lUrnin-, ,'1 Q, 1,. U. "J.l .v ;) It. L. .'l.'IH, Q. H. 1H77. ;i2. Aftiiiii liv (lie (III her, iiu.llM.r, twn iiiitwir linillii'is 1111,1 a nniiiir si.-ilir, all n'prcsi.iitcl |,v the. Iiidi,.,- us iiiinr, ,,r 11 |„.|M,ii killcl oil ilu- '■i-MM.I Iniiik li.iihMiv. Tin- iiclioii ,vaM r,,r f'^.tiOII claiiianfs- -//,/,/, iliui 111,, "conmirl. iiihi uj-cciiilaiil and ,li'.-ci-iiilaiil rclalioiiM " ,',,til,j uloiic Imvc thf n,L'lil lo iHaiiii ihmiancs (ordeal li occ»si,.ii,.d l>y a,|Uiisi oIIcium'. and lliat tlicreCorc, III HO lai' as IJK' lii(,||i,.|H ,111,1 siHicr were cm- I'l'iiu'd, l|ii> ai'lion was iiiiloiindcil, and must Ik- diMMisMd. liurst V. (irami Tnmk JMlway Cii., 4 C^ 1,. II. l.Ml, s. ('. 1,S7S. "^ .'i.'i. DaiiiaficH Hcif claiiMcl lor injiiricH wliicli wcurivd loiilaiiiliir in ooii.sc,|iu.iu'f oC having I'fi'ii run iiilo liy a niiiawav liorNc. wjiioh 11,1?! b.fii IrwIitiMM'd liy a Call ol' snow IVoin acliiiridi voul. Ill,- dclViiilaMlH wen- Iriisici.s ul lliis t'liiinli. and provcl llial (liciv had lircn a licavv Miow .storm just prt'viuiis ami iiji 1,, ten o'cloi'k ol tlu' morniiij; or llu' .lay on wliicli the a.'ci- s.('. imt;). :il. On the ISlh Deeemher, IS"", the appel- lant, ami deteiiilant.was rein rn in j; from Levis to Si. Miehel where he live.1. Jlewas ..riviio' himself, and was aeeoiiijiaiMe,! hv his son. lie was iip|iroaehin>r the lop ,,f the hill „i, the lii-h road near the parish of Heamnont, ami thiTe wusj,Miied l,y UHlei;;h fr.iiiii,' in the same diree- lion. Ill whieh was th,' plainliir ami his .s,,,,. i here had fallen Imt t\M) or three inelies of Know, and the sleij,'hs ran 0(inallv on aiiv pari ol'the roail over its whole wullh". 'I'he .lefend- unt'sslei^rh had lullowed the plauiliir's sleikrh tor some nnnules when u collision oeenrred. J he deleii,lanr,s lior.n- struck the plainliirH Heijrhaiid lell. The sleij;h was hn.ken. and the plaintill him.self receive,! serious injiines. All action of damiifres was on these L'r'onmi.s lireinj; appealed from hv defendant was euii- firnie,!. Merrier k aiioi/, 10 11. L. .'iUrf, Q. B. ;!5. To nil uction for dama^ie.s caused bv the destruction cjf a horse that lell into a pit niade under delendant's authority in the streets of Montreal, the defemlants plea,led that they had given out the work to he done hv aiuulieV and tlicrelore were not responsihle— //<■/(/, that tlii.s would not alter their liahiliiy, hut, as the horse was without a driver ai tne time of the accident tlie action woiiKl lie dismissed. Salran v The Xeir Citij Gas Co., i h. N. 97, S. C. 1879. ' .'W. Deniaml in damai;es tor haviiii; cau.sed the lossol piaiiitilfs Imr^e and damage to his sleigh and harness caii.sed hv the elevation of deleiidants track ahove the roud-hed ol tiie Hiree . On evidence that the niniuviiy (Voiii wlue I the damai;e arose wiim cause.! hy the Hieigh heinj; .■aiighi m this p,,rli,,n of the track and upset, judgment for plainliir tor the full yaileol the .lamage. Cari.itinr v. M„„lrml (III/ I anneiii/er liitilway Co., A L. N. 2^i», S. C. ;t7. .(.v.sr„.;sO;,uidina|)pe:il,j,„l^;,„e„t inn, meaning the plaintill, had stolen some of his coal — We/./, in review, conlirming a jii,!.'- meiit lor $oO damages and costs. JJowden & nart, S. C. It. 18SU. tiw'S '"»"' who acts In liis own name la Ijabl.! to lie ihlrd iiarty witli wlioia lie coiitracl.s, without pn-iu- llii C [;"■' "'^ " " '''"^'' "«'""»'■ "'^ luauiitttur alio 241 HAMAflKH. rofMH,.,|(„,,Ht„rt, ,1 Jn,l«„M.„( .,!■ J120 ,lu,„ J, (or Mu.M„r |,.,„„ ,,.| ;.,| |,v ,(,.r,.,„l,'t a ■ "^ . 6wi'/;i V. A;h/(/,v, S. (;. 11, lH7|), • DAMAGKS. 242 "fir!:;n:,i:r:;':^'^':T''' Mr. --was And where iicddn noiary n,m,MHr ,|eleM,lan. (nr .leD.nT.ui,,,,-' , cImra.Uer, wiH,.|M:,,MH,„,nl i,, Huvin. HMhe ,l,,,,r <;MlHM.unH|, .•|,,,n.|,, HH (Ik.,,,.,;,,|,,;,,,,,, ,,„, : '^ * 'h departure li,r Kuioile Appillant was earryintr " iirid .,lher places.' on ''M^inessasawholeHale^'roeerat-lonmio u, I vv'iH leaving, with his ,.on l,,- ll e W k;,' ' "ii-'Wered I , , . „ l' '"'"•;'/"' 'I'"' pl.'untiir 'I -//W./. thu. ihe,.llidav,( was,|,.(V,:,iv. '::.:':E'i:;'?::i:::i:rv;;;;;''ii:;':;;','r;! '<• ;'::;;;" •;','•; I'- ''-ii";rri.,t''wi;L"; n- n roha,e,a,,M. to jus,„y ,he i,,„„ „f "i< wilt, and the parties, on (he matter hei,,, <^^plained,Hettledal,outthe,.„.u,e t ,■,,, I ,7 with,,„tunyre.erve.andlhe;ieei, u , . once ,.h.,.,.,, wi,h„u, havin, h.'l.n ' u| am Kaol-/A/,/, reversm- the jiid-inent of ,1' ;=..;'::.■;;;::. ::;:,,.£; ;j:i;i,; ■ .00 I)efendan( took out a rm>>„^ „„ainst pli'intK , an,i (he la((er properly^.'sist 'l ,, l!n;>H.edinj,,andoh(aine,l^,s!lM^i::a n, ; ' Utl M.ed lor wrong and mali,:ious nn,;,,' "', I '""''■ ""tlusca.se. I.wasperlcM.llv/lea li" was entitled to damag,.., and the o lv 'IMostion WU.S as ,0 the anTount. T e e ' rl avanle'n'" ''""*'.•"' "' "lis sum had h e m awanled >y a jury, the oiirt wouM never (hml dislurhing It, and it did not .seem ri'd/t t , change the assess,,,,.,,, of .lamages under sue rcu„,s,ances. The amount ^as no( ex, .?s- S . C . J"j-;';'5"l'="'"i'''„e,l. CmpMlk Rcves, 51. In an actio,, ,,f , lamages f,,r fal..e arrest on a charge of receiving Stolen g. , ,|s tl "re ng no proof of n.aliceT though the l,il was thrown out l,y theg,'an,l jurv, 7he action „,, dismiss.1. l'el,.,niu..yVork;^an,2l!:l^, 52. 'i'hedefenilants, metnlK-rsof the Monti-eal po ice force we,-e sue,| in .hwnages f ,;"H arrt^-t A murder had heen committe,! t,v a V ;o I'^Hon the 12,1. of July, and the .lief of Police hiul received an a„o,iv„,ous N; tor, .stating that plaintiff was i,„plicate,V ilie intormadon (urne,| out to be witi„>u fo,„„lation--/M/, that notwithstandi - le .lefendants were in good fuuh in „„'k m' e a-Test. the plaintit}' was entitle,! to co, , Snsa- m 243 DAMAGES. DA^fAOKS. 244 »f •>■}■ riic pliuntifr Im.l hfcii ftrrcHicI on n •■ai.iii,- iHsi,.,| l,y ,|clWi.lmilH ajriiiir>l |,i,„ ,„, „ ''"''"''''' „';»i'ii (•oN,'..rMi.,^' N ,. i„irl,n.r.s|,i|, Miut.T llu' plaiMiilf rc.HMcl ill New ,(,.r-,.v lui.l »a« :ii Mnniival ullrii.lin;- tii.. pn.L'rf.-H ;,| I ii'Miif uliirl, ||,„I aiiscii (Mil ..rtliis,|i-,„i(,.,| I'liii.M wli.-n ;.iT..sl,.,!. 'I'll., capias was aioif S! I'lfhhis, S. ('. It. IH77. (15, .AcliuM ,.f (laiMiiu'i-. iiL'aiiis'l ,|,.|i.,i,|,i,it, h j)l.VMM;mii, (.,r l„iv:M- .•.uis,.,l tl.iv(.,.x..,MitioM- loiH-n.-atwnM |,l,i,i,iill fnr ,i tux .In.. ,|,.r,.,„lu„t |l,-,lWltll(-,S|ntWuCUl|s,..,,„„|tllrtuXnlUM,,tlK.r ll.c .■VMlcr,,.,. loft no ,|,.i,|,t tliut tlic-c di/iwi r-ht IHM hiU 1„.,.,| |,ui,il„.(i,r,. ,.x,.(Mili,,i, i.M.mi.Hl a,i.ltlrutl„.,|,.|i,.,|,u,i ha.l I,,..,,!,, ..m-r ,vi.,., .'"'T'""'. !'';■'"■, <'PI"-iiio„.s ON tl„.;:,„n,Ml ..ail l..'cii lil..,laii.| liiauilaiii.vj at ii c.-t I., tin. ";:'•'■ "-MS „„ .,,„„,• „f ,„ali.H. „n il„. par, „i '.!'■ '■•"I""(, y.-t ^,.. I.a^l „,a.|,. a iiuHial',., ai„l fin I. liniiillti Marmitai.i, 10 It. (;. m, s. C I IHjJ, ' ' ' I (iC. llkiial SdzHri/or Sch.ol 7V.v.,.-|'laiM til H i.r„pefty l.a.l 1,.., m sciz.'.! aii.l w,l,| |„, H.;lio„ftax' at th<. iiiMlaiKM. „r tl,,. ,|..r,.M,la,„- i in virliHMit a .vrit in whi.th ■lii.v callv.l il,,.,,,' lariMlM.IM.Col I.an." I'laintitlallo.;,.,| tlial ' the .Jdi.M.lants ,„ s„ ,|„i,ij. |,a,| not u,s,.,| tl,, naiiu.«-|,„;, ,|„. |,i„. |,a,lKiv,.ntl,on,;il.attl„.v I, ail ilH'^'al V N('i7i.,' I).,. I ^...1.1 1 1 > 246 pr..|,.n.Iin,- 1,. ..x,.,-,'!.,. ,l,„ ,v,t „,• „ „„„,,,/,„, , . ,1 V .•'""' "',""'"""'i"^'lif..n...,ls..t..,|o: •i ■ ll.atl„jvin^-,|„„..-olK,w.H „.., .i|,i„,.„ « I -unry tlial 11,.. |„„.sH.a.| H .ii;.,..,'| i.v ,,J,„ "' 'ii!< n..;.'l..;..n..,. ,„• wa.il ..f .loll, an,! j„,|,r. "lent a-ain-i I, In. for tl,.. vain,. .,f tl„. ,or:.. HM.n^.Mt.. A.r/ V. ^^,,/.,.o(.i^L.(;^(J:c. •If^. Tlic |ini(,ri<.|.)r of a "licii |„. rvi,t« the s,.rvi.:(..H "ii;.. all till. car.. .>!■, Ii."l ill.sn„.„t roll was n..||, l,,.],,. |,a..„| ,„, ,.,„ n,a. ,. I,y aHseH.o,.,s „,.t p„. .,,.„,„. o,, ,„,(,^,,,,^,^. 'l""l;'i'.'Htu,ns, l.<.ca,.-e,|„.n,;ic,.sl,a,l„otl«.,., n.^nilarlypv,.,, u,„il„.ca„se (l„. pn,p..,-tv l,a Uen H.,l,| « n ;„./x. The proof' Hh.'.wc.a tl.a the s,-uuR. l,a,l ,K,t l„.,.„ „,!:,|e in the proper m>n,e..l the .l,.|on.lant,s, that the wnt hU ,,o' been ..ta.npe.l, an.l that the a.-sessorH ha.l no uTriu ;,r''.'" ;''f"»"""-nt reciuir,..! hv law U to her han.l It was prove.l ly the ,iele„se yu> law, hat a 1 the „oti,;e,s ha.l heen .'iven, a. ha.,,ilact.theplaintilfhi>,i«elfl,a,r«ive n,tt.?, l''r r^'«— /W'/, ll.Ht plaintiff ha, nutestahii.Mhe,! the essential all,.f:ations of his declaration ; that .iefen.lants had a ri.r ,t to right, they l,a.| „se,l a name which, aceordin.' to law, they sh.a,l.| „ot have us..,l, an.l in c , - ^«l..ence they wouM he con.le.nned to pay e ^iM ling dania.e« an.l one shilling ,,,,sts!^ liar. ac[im/l'''',.'Ti^ '", ^^'''/••^^■^•-Plaintifl- hronght su I'e n" . '"'r "' "^ "^'•■^■^' ^^'"'''' ''"'1 l'^'"' w >.• " '^ 'l'*^'-'''«e I" the hind legs, an.l 1 K I .leten.htnt, preten.ling to he ahle to cnre ha^ t, stgivet, o plaintilf certain renie.lies for ardaierwardshaii taken away to his hon.e a u .less tho'V/"'.- ^''"' «'™"g^-"^'>t >vas that u less the delen, ant cure.l the lioi-se that he a to charge nothing for his services ; hnt, in- lie end 01 several woelvs ,„„ch worse tiian he 'iain'tft^^r' '" ,"';'i '"■ "'^^ '^1'""'^^ "'■^^less. hc^ M i",'"", "^ ^fi'V an.l tender,.,! hack the "ere ''^; """''""■ l>^'l^»d'i'it plea.|,.,l that e L t S'"*';"'"''^ of a cure, and that if plairuifl 8 servant, who, hef.,redefen.|ant ha.1 wken „e horse hon.e to treat, ha,l us,.,l the oi' hM*""! ''°"f'''!0' to instru,;tioi,s-//«^/, on the evidence, that defendant was wrong i. stallion i- hound 'I' Ihe stallioi, 1,1 i,.„l „,,.',. •V, " "'"■)■ '" l'i''vent iiijiirv, , ",.|u|„.re the n.are serv.',! ,|i,.,| f,-..,,, n,,,,,,-;. ;;• •'';'Y''''.'''-'''Vlu-stalli.M, wan M'to a settle,,,,.,,!, thon.^h the p,.o.ec>,tor lu, ,|hta,ne,| :i legal op,nioi, tl,at it w,i. a case nillclf. 2,i I.. C. J. ISl, Q. H. isTj. ■* 7.{. Where a w.mian, not with intenti,,n to ^'icai, hilt (ipparently to ann.,v a neir|,|,or, appr..priate.la<|nanlity of ice .leliver.-.l t,. the alter who prosecute,! l,er for huxvuy—/M,L Ihatshewasnot entitl,.,! to dainau'es'lbr inalil !i«'."'n'"'ir'Tv,'I,""' ^'^'"' '^ LacMette, 1 L. N. 74. Action was hronght hv appellant, av.nin.' jiotarv, l.,r .nahcioiis pros,.cntion. Kesp,;,„|e,u lia.l caiisi.,1 apnellant to hearresi,.,! on a chai-'e of perp,i-y, an,l it was alle.'ed that this pi^oc...^?!- ing ha.l heen taken tnali.nouslv an,| without nr,> hah e cause. 1 he Circuit Court for the .;ountv 01 lJ,.,llord sustained the action, an.l allowell tiie plamtitt, now appellant, filtv .lollars ,lau,- a^'es. ihe case was ti.ken helbre tl,e Conn of Keyiew, an.l that court reverse,! the i,i,|,r|„e„t. an.l ,l,sn,isse,l the a.;ti.,n. It was' f,-,;;,, the latter .ludgment that the plaintitl appeal,.,!. It appear,.,! lliat there was a suit sroin- on hetw,.en the Iru.stees of the Parish of St. Jean Haptiste (le Koxton and one McGi-ail, and the trilstces ^ffnj^^^l F^^ li iii m ^ ri l{e>ersii,g S. C. .See 2U. C. 79, & 1 Dig. 3S5, 110. 247 DAMAOEfl. PAMAflKa. 248 ImviiijI l.een fliiiniiionpd to ansHPr on faitu et mMr.1 t..i.cl;ii,K Hn' InHl. .,r.:prliiin nvVrnirtits "I llif pl.-H, npfM'll.mt, h|,o w(iH llicir Hcrrcdu-v- lr"aHi,r.T, iip|M'iir<..i in ,.,„iit on llioir lipimli; niMl iiiii.lcai,HH..r(.. (lie ,|ii(.HtioiiM. /t wiis iji tl...... aii.-«..rM tlu.t l|„. .illru'.d pprjiirv uiis ooMMjMrt.Ml. \\|„.„ «|,n,.||u,„ wftH an-,.-i,.,| on tli«'ch,ir;;<'i,|'|„.,Jiirv, rlic inM;.'islrul.. [mmpl liini ovTrlortnnlHl ll,.. .'riininiil i.-nn of (),.tol,..r, l>'t>N,nn(( tlic j.'niM,l.|urv ictiiriifil ii irnc lull linl 111.' cii-.c will nut irici, owint' to homk' t.'cliMinil ..rr,,rs in tl,.. ii„lictnicnl-/A7,/, tliiil " '';"', " *'l''»''l.v cstiihliHlir,! that tiuT.' waH prnhabic cause lur l.rinKin- tl,.. «cn.««ti,m. ilic iMa^'i-trat.. llioMnlit ,-o. and tho (rnu„l iiirv /niiMd a inic lull, Hiid Hvo jnd}.'<'s,,r ij,,. Silnrr- lor Cml, Mittinj; in tlic Cnrl ol |{,.vi..«-, cndwiU'd nMM,,„,no„ Ol' llii-^-randjurv nndolll,,. „,u.'i-. tnitc H,,u-, then, wan it pn-MiM,. „, ,-av iLit tliP plaiiiMl acted witlioot piHil.ahle cause'' It jvan nut iiecessan- tliat the ftcciisati.Mi hIiouM rie pn'v.'d III order to hold renpondent five t'roni rcHponsihilitv. It was .Mutli.uent to hIiow that Jielia,! lint acted uithout prohahie cause, am! the evidence was ample li.r this puriHw. Judi:. ment ot (he Court of ileview, di.-niiMsii„r ,1,^ n'"n"'.u-l."'''''""'"^' i^eauchemia & Tru7kai,, tr). Ill an action of daiiiRi;en for inalicioiiM proseeiiii,,,, for hi^raniv- //,/,/, that proof'that llie jiluintill had leen foinierlv convicted of attiiiiptinjr to imve carnal ltiiovvled>re of a irirl uiider eleven years of age will he udniittcl in nnlipition of daninges. Landa v. J'uuleur, 1 ■L. N. ()14, S. C. 1H7H. . Tfi. Andaju.ljiiiieiit ohtained hy defen.lant in right ol hiH «ite against plaiiitiK inay he pleaded III coMipciisatioii of daniugcH clainied fur such malicious prosecution for higainv. II). 77. Action hy a coiiiinercial traveller iK'ainit his eniplover Ibr huviiig inalicioiislv, an.|\itli- oiit pi-oliHhle cause, procured his" arrest and detention on acharge of fehmiously enil.ez/lin-' «"'", , .^^1' 'I I'l'evious occasion the plaintill' hud cold Ins samples, and hail heen dehited will, the an, omit hy his principal, who, however, told him Dot to do so again. This tune he got instruc- tions hy telegraph to sell them for «!50 or *(iO, niidall overlftiO was to he his own. Resold then, Ior$o0, and on his return left $20 in de- lendaiits otlice during his ahsence. The balance he had used to pav liis travellii,.' e.\penses— //eW, that the evidence did noT Jiistilv a charge of einhezzlement and arre-t, and the plaintitt' would have jmlgment for S'-'DO and costs. Minell v. Le.i.w, 2 L. N. 108, S. C. 7s. Action of damages for having hegiui a criminal prosecution against plaintill'. I'lain- titt was arrested, and after examination of ihe l^cts hy a police magistrate was dischar.'ed ilie trouhle arose out of transactions wl'iidi the plaintill' had undertaken Ibr the defendant as a hroker in stock, and which had resulted iii Joss— y/p;,/, that there was want of prohahle cause, and $200 damages and costs allowed BarUiek Dai/;/, 3 L. N 230, S. C. 1880. 79. I'crsoniil //i/in-y.— Action of damaces against the deleiidant for having caused°to plaintill the loss of a finirer. and the eonsmuput 249 suttering and peril of life hv t rying to upset a load of wood on which plaintiff was seated or wn« re.ting |h,. evidence showed that Ihe plaintitl had his left h.viid on the woo' at the lime, whiid, was so lac.Tated and torn, in eon- seoiienc,. of the act of defendant, that he was ol'liged toalh.w it to he amputated s hivs alterwnrds, that he »utr,'red verv much Ibr HPveral months, during which iime he was U' alile to work, ami was at one time In danger ot losing his hi;, hy tetanus. Th, urt Inln^v gave Inn, $:i,000, hut in appeal red I to *l!()0 V,:v/rls ii Ghiyni.'., 10 H. L. 27.), Q. J{. Is.^o. VI. Mkahi'be of. HO. Plaintitr, in liieSuperiorCourt, institiilpil nn action airainsi the defendant lor the n very «'[ one hundre.j tl,.,usand dollars, damaires ftlfged to have h,.eii snU'ered hv him hv rea-on o the caiicellalioii ,,f two fetters (if credit oMained In.m the ,,iaiiaL'er of the Hank of .ironloat Montreal on the Ciiv Dank of |,oi|. lion, on the 17tli .laiinarv. |H7,'), one for X'tOO ^tg. and the other Ibr L'i.OOO stg. I'lainliff 'i.llcged that the said letters of cre.lit were so given tothe nlamtitroM the eve of his depar- ture lor Kiigland, on or ahout the same date when he was g,,ing to make his purchases tor the next .season of trade; that he ilepositcl the letters of credit with the Citv Hanfc, London, n;lio receiveil the same, and agreed to act as ilirecteij ; that upon the streiisrth of this the plaiiiti/l gave onlers for lar-e onaiitities of gowls. intending todraw for the pav nt of then, against his credit ,so estahlisli,.d with the Citv Hank; that on the 7ih ol Fehriiarv plaintiff drewacheipie on the Citv Hack for t'2:,0, which was not^ accept(.d, on the gr I of a despatch received hy cable from delemlant cancelliii'' the said letters nf credit, and afterwards conlirmed liy lettirsj that in sai.l letters the defendants and their agents gave t.i the City Hank their rea.sons for so acting, which were of a verv damaging nature to the plaintiff, his character. Ins credit and slandiiigas a merchant, and which were utterly lalse, untrue and unfounded. The plaintill ihereupon protested tlieCitv Hank, out without ellect. I'laintiir further alleged that the cancellation of said letters was done mali- ciously, and without anv reasonable .'rounds or cause, and lyili, a view to injure and ruin the lilaintit , and had in fact a disastrous eflect on the creilitand husine.ssof plaintiff,aiid amon-st those with wliom he w.is doing business. Plain- till claimeil $100,000 damages. Verdict for plaintiff Ibr $6,500, which was confirmed hy the court sitting in review. ()„ appeal, verdict .set aside on the ground of exces.sive damages and new trial ordere, I* Jiank of Toronto ScAnsell, I n. Ij. ibi, y. a. 1875. VII. Not Barred by Cbimixal CoxvicTioy. 81. Where a person had been tried criminally lor a libel and punished, and action for damages was alterward.s taken- JIdd, that the criminal trial and punishment were no bar to tlie action tor damages, though nominal damages only XIV. I. Dig., p. 148, Art. 39. 248 (tliinvpil tlmt (lie I the \\,H, ' 111 the mill lorn, in <:iin- aiil, lliiil lie wikH IllilCil MIMIC lIllVH very iiin<;li lor 'li lime lie, win I' time in ilnii;.'i'r The conn lulmv rcilii I III $i;|)0. Court, instltiitpd for I lie recovery olllirH, (lllllllljrc.q r liiiii liy reu-^oii citcrs (if ereilit il' llie Hank of V Miiiik of |,on- r), one for X;t()0 (■t^^ riainiitr I" credit were so 'p ol' liiH (lejKir- tlic ^luiie (latp 1 |iiirc|iiiseN for le ilenosilcil tlie nank, Loiiiion, :reeil to art as 111 of this the ' qimntilies of lU'iiieiitof tlieiii with the Citv iriiarv |ilniiiii(r or ri.'iO, which of a (le^palcii cancelliiii; the min conlirineil he clefi'iiiliintH ty iSaiik their ere of a very hin character, ant, ami which Ibiiiiiled. The 'ity Hank, out ailet;eil that as (lone mali- t)le jirouiiils or and ruin the roiiH etfect on ', and ainonaHt iness. Plain- Verdict tor firmed hy the al, verdict set damages and >nt()& Aitsell, CONVIOTIO!^. ed criminally 1 for damages the criminal to the action miages only acpherson, 'i 249 DEATH. PKKDS. Virr. PREaCRIPTION OK. H:'. All action of d.iiimt'PN for a 7»„,v/ ,f,li/ H (irescnhed l,y two year., a-i.l the eoPrt in l.0M,„|lo ake notice that Huel, |.rescri,,t ion ha« mlcrvencl, even without ,ilea to th!„ ,.,le.". H.'r'.'lHK ""■' '''""''■'■"'> 21 L.C.J. 21.'>, X. KirjiiT OK Hkirs to Action kou, M. In RH action of damnges hv an ex- voliintoer for imprisonment and " hardHhi,. '"idhreil liyhim lit the hands of the ollicers! the ncuiient afier the e.x|,ir.ilion of his term of engagement-//,./,/, that Ihongh the right I, mich actions was purely personal, and conld not U. insiiinted liy his heirs, that neveitheh^ss itco,il.l|,. continued liy them where it had I.een in.-tiuted l,y the person himself previous , iHH .lealh, and that they could succeed to tl e SC."l879 ""'''""' '■• *''''«"^«' « «• L. R. 205, XI. TiuNsFKit OF Claim fob. 84. A transfer and assignment of leased ore- Pi i»;eH does not carry with it « Iransler ofa •■li'i". for ilamages arising out of the deleriora lion ol the nreni ises hy the less, ,r . IUmviZa r,wnel oh ige,| topay on account of such judgme - tifa ;ieT"r" '"'']? .'''■" P^"ver',o7ind ut that the bark was still in the bush when the hrst action was taken, and to have .lelive'., t defendant, that he had no right of actioi'an judgment granting him damages was rever"" Laines6e v. LabonU, 8 R. L. 354, Q. B. I87V iM nr. Of Partv to AiM-KAi, does not Srn- •'►:mi Ai'I'h.m,, kh' AI'l'KAL. IV, Or I'.uiTV TO Si (T I.OKS NOT .Sr.srtNi. 1 HoeKKIIIMis, y. (»►• THHTATOH, .vff IlKtHSTUATIO.V. V I. I'liooi.. III... 'V. Ok V\ht\ to Hv H7. Kf),,! of —The death of one deremlanl, Hi.ioi.g several jointly and severallv s I, does "I't suspend the proceedings ,/»,;,„/ tl„, ,„r. 1877 VI. Proof of. 8H 8H. An affidavit of the death of a pernm out ol Lower ( aiiaila. purporling t,> be sworn l.elorp a (oreigii nnlary, i|,„.s not make pmoi .,f in eon- ten Is. (jaiiiu A Ihirn,,,, 2;i L. C. J. IsL', Q It DKHATS I)K COMVTE-Srr AC COUNTS, ACTIDX kn I{Ki.mTR.N. DKI'.KNTURES. f. Of MrxicifALiTV. m-e COUI'UKATIO^S. MUNICIPAL DEl'.T, I. Kvidenceof, secEVIDEXCE. DECISORY OATll-See EVIDENCE. DECLARATION-See PROCEDURE. I. Ameniwent ok, s,r I'LKADINO. Jl. Service of, see PROCEDURE. DEATH. I. Action of Damage.s for. Cannot hi BRoronT L>Y Poll iTf-i! Vir, ^,\ r- li. AGES '-"I.'.ATKnAL llEL.vTlU.N3, SCC DAM NeVs^*^ Attorney ad Litem, see ATTOR- DECLARATION OF HYPOTTIFC— See ACTION, HYPOTHEC, SALE Judicial. DEDICATION. Ptm^T'ini'i'If '''"'• ''" MUNICIPAL COR- l UKAllONS Stueets. DEEDS— «ee CONTRACTS. be I. COPIE.S OF. n. Fruors in, nee IMPROBATION. III. How Proceeded aoaivst. IV. Interpretation of. i?oY' ^"^\l^^ TO, CANNOT Allege their own Fraud IN \ oidance of, see FRAUD. VL Sous SeingPrive, li >i 251 DEFAUT CACUt I. Coi'ii'.s OK. HI). A coi.y of an.,(ari,il,l,.(.,I i.nt c.-rtili,.,! I,v t M..,,uy,sn,,nil,,v,aM.|,.L,. ,u-tu,u l.t...,! oi, II. EliROKS IN. Pxn?;..T''r'"'l,""' ■''"',"'','"''"''"" '"^ incorroctiv ./. HE LIVER i'. 2;-)^ DEFENSE EN FAIT-^ec I'LE U)- ING. DEFENSE EN DROIT-See PLEAD- ING. Iir. How PRoruKUED Again.st. Jl. /lu. correct. HMs of a, inly cortifio.l ,-opv ol .1 notarial ade mav l.c atta<^ke,i otlicrwi-e iian hy an inscription ,•/) /mix, an.! when tlio pioccliirc by way of s„.;l, inscription isunncccs- Harvon.h, to ,c r.joctcl. I)U,.es;u- ,■/ % Lalvnde ct al., 21 L. U. J. 105, S. C. 187G. JV. IntERI'RKTATIOX OP. !I2. Where the faculty is accorded to the pur- chaser in a deed of sale of iniinoveal.ies to relieve any o( the lots described in the deed of e who e balance oftiie purchase nionev, "liicli by the deed carries interest at the rate TCr^^, ^T'T'-' '•>■ Wins to the vendor at tlie rate o sixteen cents per foot of the lot to be d chaipi the interest at the rate aforesaid S alt I87y""' ^"^"■'•'' '^^ ^- ^- J- ^27, VI. Sods Slii.vo Pkivk. no^'L^l" ■"/''l'"""^'"' ,»i"ler private seal need 94. A deed of discharge sous seinn privi mav be set up againsta notarial dee.l of obfiKation in the hands o( a transferee of the credftor, and that without .special proof of the execution ot the discharge or that it was signe,! at the tin.e It purports to have been signed. Prevosl & Jleldit^oii, 2,i L. C. J. 167, Q. B. 1878 DEFICIENCY. oiimiFi., \ri' .S.Aijh .JlDlciAl.. II. In Qi'AXTirvoK I.ani) sold mky hi- Ri- DEFlilOIIEURS. PRIVILEGES OF—See Executions E.xemp- TION. DEG UERPISSEMENT-Sce AB IN- I>ONMENT, HYPOTHEC. DELAISSEMENT— See HYPOTHEC. DELAY— ^ee PROCEDURE. I. To ApfEAi, i.v In-soi.vkncv, ,vce APPEAL ACTliy."""" ^^"'""'""«v Action, ..^; DELEGATION. TAKCK OF, see VE^ 'ERS. Of Hypothec, see HYPOTHEC. purchTS: "'' '"' ™''''^^ ^"^^ DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER— See LIBEL AND SLANDER. I. Aggravation of, in Pi.ea, see LIBEL. DEFAULT— 5ee PAYMENT. I. Judgments by, .?ee JU'DG.MEN'TS. II. WuEN Necessary, «ee OBLIGATIONS. DEFAUT CACHfi-See SALE, war- KANTY. DELIRIUM TREMENS, Wills null in Consequence of, see WILLS. DELIVERY. I. Of Moveables Sufficient to Constitute UoN'ATIoN > II. What is. J. Of Moveables Sufficient to Constitute Donation. 95. Where a son of the defendant filed an op- position hv vvhi''h he i^Kinot n i ;- ■ i ' Lo (• .1 . /""-" "^ (.i.-vin.e.l a piano .seized in 118 father a house, the evidence was that the son, the opposant, had commenced to teach the piauo Y. Zi)-Z 253 -See I'LEAD- -See PLEAD- ;y. ii.es Sold uy tiik H.i) MAV III-; l{i;- "TION QUANTO TIONS EXEMI'- See ABAN- THEC. lYPOTIIEC. DURE. .vec APPEAL. Action, .tee 'oa Payment, fDORS AND C. ;n"s. , see WILLS. O CONSTITDTE 5 CONSTITUTK t filed an op- finu tirizcd in that the son, wh the piauo DEMTTRRAOK. DEPOSIT. f.,r a livinj; so,„e ne venrs ,,r<.vi„iislv, .i,„i |,is t.Httl,.m,pon It l.a,l h,..!, n.|n,.v,.,l ,-o ,K.wh..rJ els,. ivn,l ivinamc, away for sevrai ,lavs , that tuMlolc.|„la„ta,Mlthen.storhi,sla,nilv,| I pay, ami ,li,l not use the piano at ali: tliat Blior., It was Pxdnsively i.se.l hv th ^^i an ami Ins piipils-//,/,/, t,;,u „,, ,,VoJ.'^„ '^~ was siifhcien an,l tlio opposilion waH la?, . im ^'^'•-'^'"'"•& 'Vo,t-««, ;{ L. N. 91, su. 9(1. lint whore an opposant claimed ii,„lera donadon winch had never heen registered nor had any .lelivery heen made of the efh-e V | e n. What is. 97 The petitioner, a merchant of Leeds. England, sought l,y revendication to recover po^se.s,on o goods sold and sont to Mon.rmI where they had heen deposited and were s lying in the Custom House. Tiie revendi 'atio was sought f.iron the ground that the buver had since purchasing l,eq,„ne insolvent The nmirTtee «■>'•' rl'i*' T"T^ "'«' '•''vendica.i n 1 meisecW of the Insolvent Act of 1875- y/3over, he had been absent from 'the cfty om wo to .SIX months during that time, and here ore, could not be said to ifave been "'con- stantly in practice as a dentist during said three years, tfiat he had not complied witli e req"'.:e.nents of the statute, and tTie man! lai. us vv^as discharged. Younff v. Dental Association oj Province of Quebec, 2 L. x\. 292, S. c' 1879? DEPOSIT— &e BAILMENTS. I. Foil Certiorari, see CEUTIORARL il. In Coi-RT. lU. in Rkview, see REVIEW. «e« banks!''" °*" ^*''''' ''"" ^'^'■'''^"'^'^T ON, V. Of Official Pi.an.s and Books of Re- FEi Kxcn, see KEUISTRAR. VI. WiTiiURAWAi.oK, .set' PROCEDURE. II. In Court, 101 Where a party to a suit deposits money in tlie hands ot the prothonotary to abide the order ot tiie court, the other side cannot with- 255 DEPOSIT. draw tlic' inoney on siniiili. motion or petition, espccmllv iChis petition niipes questions of (act winch Hl,(,„|,i ho reirnlnrly tried on an inciden- •an act to kurtiikr amend tiik act rkspeotino jidiimal and othkil dkposits, A.i.iriitffl to 2Wi,lul,,, 1880. traf.'s Courf, who, in liis ollicial capacif';-! all into roceive.1 lil„K,c|f, or by hi.s depuly, aK a Jn iViai r oil or deposit, anys„m of one huiulre^ ,inll„-'r ,, vor " hal surer of the fr,;vi„ce !.. s„eh l.ink or o | or m ,. c "r'v i""'" ■•'"","". '''"Ill '"■ I'liliealeci bv the "aid tJoaMm^r and.shall/i,.|„,|,„rocarlol the caVe or of e nrac™^^^ InKs ni wlnrli he lias n-ceivod the said . ,m „rdenosit receipt of such banl< or othrr mon." ary ins „ i, hin,Bel7or"hv" li."','"' 7 '"" '■''»«;'" oa m^-ilT.si! ' I'ave {^„yiv .1 1 '^ '"* ileputy received, either as the pr ee of a judicnii sale or olherwisf, a sum of oi,o hui.dro dolhrs or. ver, shall imm-diatWy rtepo.-it such sZ toX "r,,"li? ot tlu- tieHsurer of the I'rovinee in suci ha nk r ot .* mo lelary institution which shall be i di "ated L 1 . said treas,,rer, and shall witliout delay iHe in th7oUco of the pi-othonotary or clerk the deposit receiit of thfl eaid bank or other monet.arv instilulloii '^''*''" "* ""' hJv !"<■""!/"' '«'■'<*''»" "lie hundred dol"l»rs which shall be received as af.iresidd by the said olKc4s ■1,?.! ! ,? be deposited in the manner aforesaid? so smmaa tl , v SrfaZ'o've;" "" *'««"*'"^' --'■ ^C.^^^ J^:C^^f^^::;ri^j^^ r/;Jori:'^r!i;!: purposes of tlu- said Act, «5 Vic. can 5, tt,"d s a mo ,d? ™ '"f,^- Any payment made to thorn undi'r the said Act tr«sV,;?r"":,'^'s;:"i^,r.';r,','ce'" t;:r^, •" >'•• '"^i-' <•- B«^ri^:'t''i^;r?P-"™''^"™'«'^ '-Z tj^J.u^^&-=-^ji:eii;^}^s=- «nd under t ,e p^ialhe" V.er ei "X en'aetd""'"'''"'"'^^"' ar^-r5,'-;e.V,';S! '^' ^"'"^ '' "f the sai^d -^^^ll^ic. cap. 5 th?'provfs7oro'}'?,ri?rc';:r^o?';i'." 'f,'° """"i-/ *"" wh"ch 8 Hi h^lniJ f'"=.r'"','K '^" ''""dred dollars covered in L''"!^^^^^ Province anu shall be rel kit t^>,..cM^ '*"'"'"'<'<' '»*''««eortliesaidAct« • aiid ?"t or, rom'U^'lr ?''*'' ^ 'i<-T ,'"/'.'? "™»"7 """I' bo tr.","^^ vhce and tmVaT,he?r^- '"""'""'' *""■"* °' «"> ^-'O" up%/det,Sli,^,''nl»H'".' ^Vr "•"" "■"«■'""•'"• of 'he frovince under onLhinSim.'H'''.''''' ''"'"'"''>' d'T'-'tnient in sums prothonmarvnr^i ''']'''"-! T" * ceitlticate trom tlie prornonotary or clerks of the court itaiinir tlint o,o odorM"'^"?';'' '"'P'""'» '" whoT'or l' p,?rtf«"r hi' ttou i.fronS '" '='"«' "''«'■<''» J"d«ment ,.i distrlh" sanction th^?eof!'*" """^ ""° ''"'''* °° *"" "^^ "' "^^ DIFFERENCE IN VALUE.. 256 DEPOSITIONS. I. IllRKCiri.AH. 102. A deposition commpnced liel'orp ii jnd"e anil ajU'rwards conliniieil l,etoir the pniiiiono- ary, is illegal, and cannot Ibnnd an iiccnsiition for perjury. J{e^i,>a v. Gib.soii, 7 U. L. 573, H- I'- lB7b. DEPUTY PEOTHONOTAllY. I. A(JE OF, C.VNXOT UK CaI.I.KD in Qt'KSTIOV *"" '\?-,I;'ir*''"''^'"' * VVUIT SlGNEU UY lIlM, .sea VVlilTS. DERNIEE EQUIPEUE. PiuviLEGE OF, .see PRIVILEGE. DESAVEU— ,Sfee DISAVOWAL. DESCEIPTIOK I. Op Pautiks, .we PROCEDtTUE. II. Of Land sold at Juuiciai, Sale, .see DESERTION. ^A\t9J Service, see MASTER AND SEll- VANl. DESISTEMENT— &e PEOCE- DUEE. I- Costs in Cases of, see COSTS. DESTITUTION. ECUTORS^^'^**'™^'^"^ Executors, .see EX- DETERIOEATION. I JocHfrf^'^®^'' Pbemises, see LESSOR AND LESSEE. DIFFEEENCE IN VALUE. L Right to, see SUBSTITUTION Rights OF Pauties. VALUE.. 25G )NS. iced lioforc ii jiulgp, 'liirc tlic |ircitlioiiu- luiiilaii aciMisiition 'jsiju, 7 U. L. 573, )NOTAHY. I.I.KI) IN Qt'fJSTIOX T .Si ON EI) 11 V Hisi, IPEUR. LEGE. 3AV0WAL. )K ilDrTRE. JDiciAi, Sale, .see 257 DISCONTLNUANCE PER AND SER- 3 PEOCE- :osTs. N. UT0R8, see EX- ON. LESSOR AND 'ALUE. rXION Rights DILATORY EXCEPTION - See PIIOCEDUKE. DIMINUTION. L Ok Prick of Land for Deficiency in yiANTITV MAY BE Cl.AIMEI) A.S DvMAUFS 'ifl- ■ACTION QuANTo MiNOKis. ^•"'^''^•''' *«' DIRECTORS. ^■<^?^J,u>?rlS^''-''™' ''^' HK«oi,urioN OP, «<'e COXl'liACTS, JJANKS, &c. POllvnoN'7 "'"' '"' ^^''^^^'^^NIES, COR- CORPOrSo™' *°" ^^'^ COMPANIES, DISAVOWAL. I. Notice of. II. Right of. I. Notice of. groun I that ten ,iayH notice was not siveii to hem heluve piv.seiitution of the petitioi.-i/e^d, am JlaiOor Cmmissumers of Moiitre,,! Ar Duhamd, 2 L.N. 300, S.C. 187'/ '"'^*"' "^ II. Right of. inl*'e1;J!,','T '^,P''*'"*'«"'>«'1 t^ken an action Hhanu 1 /"•'"* «' ''^'^"'V'*' against her linsl and, and alter inscnptiou tor prooi' the to ''i "''"'".' '°'" "'^■''- «"«l** "' "PPo^i- D a n in,!: l'''"'''''f" ^^if,''^'«-^/«/rf. that the pa iin,ada right to disavow them, a. the C ,/?V''''"«''f ''f'^ b-^ '''^ recondliation' DISCHARGE— ^fee PAYMENT. I- In IxaoLVENcv, see INSOLVENCY. DISCIPLINE. I. Of the Bar, see BAR. DlSCONTINUANCE_S.e PROCE- DURE. solvency;''"'''"' '" ^''^"''^E^cv, see IN- DISTRIBUTION. 258 DISCUSSION. i.!-'^R£rmiS!'™""'"'^^^'^*«- RA DISHONESTY. I. Insurance aoain.st, see INSURANCE. DISSENTIENTS. 1. Rights of. 10.5. Action to set a^i.le a Hale of certain lots ofland which had l.een .old hy the .school ,:o.n- iniHH,onei-« lor .school tuxen and tbr .la.nag.H_ /feW setting aside the Hale, hut lefusing da.n- ages th;..t the (act that rale pa^rs are disHen- titnts am the organization of a corp,.ration of d.^sHentient school trnstee.s may he prove,! hv hv^inn '^'f ",'^"y' e-P^'';"''ly where it i« evident by leceipls (or school ta.ves. grante.i bv euch dissentient corporation in favor of diH.^entien rate payersduringaseriesof years, an,l by othet circumstances, that such a corporation has '"r Jacio existed, and claimed payment ui echoole ^TJn "'"' ""^'""^"-^ •J"''"''? ^■'^»y y^'^^- f f C'om«».,.s-/o«e,-. o/-//,e 'fownship of' Rox- Q.B. ISvJ ' ^- ^'^' ^'^^^-^-J- 122, lOG. And held, also, that in such action it was not necessary to allege that the land in question was Hol,i at the deman,! of the defend ants, the school commissioner,-, where it wax shown that they bad receive,! the proceeds and knew from wbat tliey were derived 10 DISTINCTION OF THINGS_See PROPERTY, DEscuiraoN of. DISTRIBUTION. I. Collocation of. Ifv ^"''I'^'^TATioN of Report of. ill. HoMoLOIiATIoN UF ReI'ORT. IV. PAY.MENT OF MjXEVS. V . Rights of Creuitors. I. Collocation of, 107. Where, in a report of distribution of the proceeds ot the sale of the real estate ol an in- solven SO d by the sheritl and returned by li.m, on the 28th August, l87o, the assignee of the estate ol the insolvent was collocated in tiie amount ol his c aim (or ke, an,i disbursements, lied on the 20tii January, im-Hdd, tha having been hied atlertiie delay had expired, and withou leave of the court, that it was nn- properly bled, and the appellants, wlio were liypotbeoary creditors, could appeal from the 259 DISTRIBUTION. judgment Iioniologating the report of .listrihu- tioii, altliougli tliey liiul not contested in tlie Q "u mT' '^'""''^' '^ ^'ormund, 1 L. N. 81), IOf<. Ami, /ie/r^ian» made out to entitle the respondent to be collocated, lb. II. Co.NTKSTATlON OF RkI'ORT OF. lOlt. A ))erson '•..terested niav he allowed, on Showing ciiii.-e, lo contest a report oC distribu- tion alrer the delay olsi.x days, provided that no proceedings have been had (br the homologa- tion ot the report. Ih-Uvhuanlaye v. Pusi & ha hoc. iei-.dc Con.siniction Jacques Cartier, & Lacroix, 21 L. C. J. 100, S. C. 1.S77. 110. Where a 'endor of a property already mortgaged to a liiird parly is collocated lor the balance ot Im ^jrix dc vaite ne.U after sneh tliird person on the proceeds of the properly sold 'U judicial sale, a subsequent creditor has a rigiit to conte.-t the collocation of the vendor and the hivl mortgagee, as the claim of the lat- ter 18 a personal debt of the vendor. Arpiii v L-m:,u-e,ix k Boinn, 7 R. L. ido, S. V,. 1«75. ' HI. And where the contestation does „ot allege certain payments, alterwards admitted by the person collocated and not credited the contfc.-uint will nevertheless have the benefi- of them, and the report will be retbrmed act ,\>rdiiigly. lb. 112. And where a donor was collocated for the capital of a lik> rent stipulated in a deed of ' donation not registered, and the subject of which had been transferred to another, siibject to the charges in the Krst— T/cA/, that even a second translvi-ee had a right to oppo,sed. four of the heirsappealed, but three of them snl>equenlly desisted from the appeal i he revj,ondenl moved that as there were .-even heir,s and only one was persisting in the appeal hat the other six be ,,aid theii" share-)/' /,/, that as the report had not been homologated ami as the part of the record belonging To the conte,stati..i, was missing, that tlie coun couM "Ot give an order to the sherifi' to pav tl„. TsvP'' ^'^"' ^ ^'^'^'''"•«> 2 L. N. 104, y. IJ. V. Rkjht.s of Creuitors. 118. A claim of the contestants having been omitted from the registrar's certificate, in con- sequeiice ot the registration division havii,.- been divi,led-/M?, that thev were not bound to come 111 by opp(j>ition a/ii, lie con.tcrver, and were perfectly justifie.l in contesting the reiiort ol distribution as they had done. La BaLa- .\atwmde Ac La Society de Construction dii tamda HLa Banque Ville Marie, 2 L. N. 511, o. \j. It. 18(0. DISTIilCT MAGISTEATES. I. JuDli.MENTS OF. no. The Circuit Court has no jurisdiction on certiorari from judgments of t'he District •]ln"'n''n^'''/\,"^""^ & Blanchard, 21 L. C. J, o.U, C (... 1877. An Act to Provide forthe Aholition of Dutkipt JIagihtuatk's Courts. 1 T» 1 1, V '•/••'■■«■'""' '" 'Mill Jul!/. 1878. 1. It shall be lawlul lot the Lieut.-Uovcrnor in Council by proclamation to abolish the MBgi,,trate-s "o ,rt for ro'"Kheijl„'ruK;!:,',';v^'»«'' '••«•» ^'-^ ^i-" - Pv'MV^f\p>'a.u;"'1''. ":^'"-:'''< 'locuments, and archives of tl„ .^r? ,? Z^",'" " V"."!'''' '»*'<'li''''ff "I'deVthe authority of o wfnf Jmm"'' "■''^""''' "'"y "'•' '» ""^ Posses^siou of the clork ot such court or of any other nerson (.hull be ransmitted without ,|p|„y ,o die oHicr'.V H?^ '|! rk r.f .hlinV''''"" '"""I'' '*P™ilied in the proclamation, aud shall form part of the archives of the litter court. JISTIIATES. 2(J0 JontejJk'd a report of K oC universal ie^iane X oilier late liusban.l, aiUcur ,/,■ fomh of a le year.-' previous to own that j-lie was in anil, and would liave r the amount due in pleaded— ;m,/, thnt inlained to tlie extent lOhiyS: Jhiil,2L. X. {EI'ORT. ent of distriliution, fed without conte,-- lie seventh |iiaue or resnCnce. o n!;;;;:'"i^^!/j:!:T';i:.'-j-'-r'--i^!;^^«i^ 2L. N. ;i;i3, rcuglit aler the eigli, d,iys allowe {,v he t i,U the I onimiou Parliament ha,l no power to proced,.re-//.A/:tluu'ih;:i):;n,inK:;,LeS 'I'le had a right to legislate on matters of procedure incidental to the suhjects a" S to It. Gironard & Gem ' " ■ "- 1880. rniaiii, H L.N. lOlT, Q. B. or DOXlii;. DONATI()N. I. PV M.\Ul;i.UiK CoNTli.ACT. IT liv I'AIIK.NTS TO Cim.llHKN. ill. By l'.viiTi(ri.Aii TiTi.K. IV. pKI.KtiATlON OK ClI.UiGK.S IN. V . LviDKXCK OK. V'l. FoK.M OK. VIi. HvpoTiiKC Ci:katkd nv. VIII IxFRAfi) 01- Ciu:i)iToRs. lA. LaPSK OK COXDITIO.VS IX. A LlAlill.ITV OK TltAXSKKUKK Al. LlAllU.nv OF Do.NKi;. All. Ma»k iuiux(; Ii,i,.\t,s,s. XIII. MoKTlS CaISA. XIV. Nor akkkctki) nv SinvKXAscic d'Ev- r AM S , vvl ^/''■''v"'"^«<>f Bkxeficiakv. AVI. Of Movkahi.ks. XVII. Ok UsLKitix'T. v7}'^\; ^'"""""T'oN TO Alienate. -;.'/■ fi:«i''ATiox OP Proclked by Fraud. AA. llEVOCATIOX OF. XXI, Rights of Do.nor, I. By Marriage Contract. 122. VVIiere donation was made bv marriage contract from a hu.shand to a wile oV a s u 1 1 t f money to be applied to the purchase of ho se hold lurruture lur their joint use-Z/eW t at .I.e. death of the husband before tiaonatio, was so applied did not exempt 'he lus an Pa estate from labdity for the amount tier If :^ynwns y. Kclhj d al., 21 L. C. J. 251, SC. 11. By Parents to Children, 12H. A wife who, being in commr.nity with her usband, makes with him a donatioi^ to on of their children, remaiUB liable for one-half the 2G3 DONATION. DONATION. 264 donation, althoii;;!) she subsequently obtain judkiial separutiiin of oropertv ami roHDunce the coniimiruty.* _ VinceiU v. Benoit, 21 L. C. J. 218, S. C. liS7G. III. Bv Particular Title. 121. In order that a donation be considered universal, the ilunor must jjive all Ium I'ood.s as a universality, and the donation o" thini'i specially de.sijruated con-titutes only a special donation, thoui'h in eflect the donor has givei. all he pos.sessed. Rrunet v. Saumnre, 2 L, N. 189, S. 0. 1879 I 780 C. C. <=,^^.^^. IV. Deleo.\tion of Ciiaroes i.v. 125. Where a donation of an immoveable was niade subject to a life rent, prior to the comin;i into force of the Code, but not refjistereil, and the donee subsequently transferred the ininiovealile to another, subject to a charge of payinj,' the rent stipulated in the previous donation— //t'/(;, on contestation of a report of distribution, that tiie first donor liad no iiv- jiotiiec for his Jile rent, as it was not. distinctly specilieil in the second deed, and that the dono'r could not consequently rank for the amount of the hle-rent until lie iiad obtained a judj^meiit setting' aside the second donation. Arpin v Lamimretix &, Bedard, 7 R. L. 203, S. C. 1875. V. EviDK.NCE OF. 12G. A deed is not necessary to give valiii iimile liy ilie auccptftiice, it' it he :it appeai-iri^j; to have iiir a-) aiiythiiii.' at lor can atteHt. The ■aiiK' phice, two days ;o liave been signed ic'chires it was her tlie firHt part rehues. 1 Lower Canada ; hv >ns in Lower Canada (ie nuUiU, and the e Haiiie form. The ! defendant, toiindi.d ity» with respect to li, in reality, aie not Uonly a()echiration tlie lirnt phice Ims ig before tlie court, ;s nature, whatever > a donation, and le.Kt place it is not Ig, but o( positive lie Code. The only 1 tlie argiuiient lor irial form Ibr doiia- .s that whicli wa,9 :iiigconveviiiice,sof iiiion soccage— and Ihe article of the ties mentioned in ted Statutes L. C, erty held in Gaeem 1st be sworn before be brought with I, or must be made , and whether in I writing or not is no certificate or ever made at all. C. 1S77. BV. 3se favor certain I deed of iloimiion 'pothecary action il estate, although I the deed stipnla- >able alienated— tbe judgment of action ii'iight be ed, although the ause hypothecate 7. DONATION. DONATION. \.M. A donor wlio causes his deed of dona- tion to be registered, preserves bis ri^'hl o( hypothec and bailleiir ,le londs for all the charges apiuvciable in moiiev which are stipu- ateil in Ins favor, without the uecessitv ,,f esiH,- lishmg the value of Mich chan-cs in' the ,|ee,|. Piifresiti'.S:. Ihthord, \ Q. L. Jt. ;■,;», Q. j; jhts i;i2. And the re.'i-tration of such a donation' wil preserve to a third lioMer in whose favor such chaiges are stipulated, the Kiiiie right ol liypothec. lb. " L'fiO il'le,iln:g he coi,ser|nences of the .suit ,n hnr,,. ///"-//.A/ that notwiihslanding ,he ,|o„ati, was,,,udel,<.f,,retliei,,s,i,u.,uuof,heph.in rs a.nion, that the d..nation was evidentlv ii . Im '-! "■"'"' "'^-riditsandtheop ! „::: VlfL IX Fli.VCD OF CltEDITOH.S. i;i3. Where Ihe defen,lant, in a caseof capias hail made a .lonatioi, of all his propertv to his daughter, and did not by the deed chaise her with the payment of Ihe piaintiir,-. clam, —//e/,/ by the Court of Keview, reversi,," the imb'' nieiil ol the .•,Mirt below, that there was tu, secretion. Mann it Htsmiindic, .S. C 187(J _ V.n. Jiiitadeedofdoiiatiouoftliedonor, made in Iraudot the cre.litors, may be set aside on conteslatioM of the op|)ositioii' tii.'d |,v the donee invoking such ilier.',, /larde.s et bn,,r de anps qui I possiUe aetuelle. luent, et oui /jourront .ve tnmcer lui appurtenant an jour de son drci.s, exeepte que le donnteur se reserre la maVri.se et jouUmnee de toux lest bienx meublex et immeubles auxdoun^s .sa rie lurant, et dejonir dex animaux et elfetx mold- lierx de m^nuiie sa vie durant d xoa l,exoin et xon lit f/arni aree xa yarniture. quant a lonx lex ar.fentx qiupeureni eire dux an dit donateur, xoit par Oi/telx, ohliyationx, conxlitulionx de rentex on antrenient, alorx le dit donataire se lex rexerre enpleinc propria pour en diximxer eomme lion il arixera, mats xi a xon decix il u a quelquex aryentx on de dux comme xuxditx, alorx lonx lex ditx aryentx appartiendront en pronri- tie uux deux ditx donatalrex avec rctte eondi- lion que XI t'un d\nix dichle xanx liyn6e, alorx xapart dex ,oj,W(, viyore, never havi,,.' been registered in Canada; and consequent^ he Irench law introduced into Canlda by he edict ot lbb3 remained unattecied by the Ordinance ; and it was not |,roved, and could not be presumed, that such law became altered of 'S IV v,' ^^"f l"^"-'^ "I the jurisprudence ol the 1 rovi ice having adopted the rule coii- iv"\', !f n'^T'r:-' 'y'"''^ ^ Guoiltier, Id gillo tile subefiiuent birtli of children to tliHili.nnr 269 DONATION. BVEKANCE D'Ex- iirs Hosijitaliires XV. Oblioations of BENEFiciAnr. 143 The father and mother oC plaintiff made ft .lonation to the sifter .fplaintill', .„|,j,,,t t„ t . charge of paying; to plaintili « he,, l.e ..|,^|,|,i cnn,e of aj-e cei'tain land and s|„ek, and to the nr.her charge "r/e u.r.l.r /e,u: ..r^,,^ ,^ hujusqu,} l\uj, T, ha, ief; ,|„ service and pn.tec- ..n nl he donee be(., re his majority co„ Id not he pleaded ,n bar of the plaintitlV ri.'hiH I)ow,„ *,mT"' ^ '^- '^- ^- ^«7C & Art n« XVI. Of MovEABi,Es, \U. What con.stit,i/e.i Mireru.— To a seizure a piano at tlie honse of the .lelend.mt the son 01 he de(en,lant opposed, alleging that the piano I'a'i heen g,ven to hin, hy his father, the ,lefen'h ant, over f,ve years pi'evionsly, hy verl,al dona- tion. J he plaintiff contested this stateineni and the (jnestion which arose was as to the de' hveiy necessary to the validity of a verhul dn„. ation. Ihe proof was that the son, s,„„e live years previously, l,ad commenced to teach the piano (or a living, an,i his father l,a,i given l,i„, he j.iano for that pnrpose j that thu'eupon hu(| been removed son.ewhere else, and re mainedaway for several days ; that the ,le(e,a. an and the rest of his fan.,V did not plav a i did not use the piano at all, that in short k wa exclusive y uHecT hy the op,x.santand his pupil. -IMJ, that the proof of delivery was suffiVient, ana Uie opposition was maintained. Mc M,i,h'r .liif 7" " ,'"''^"? "'' '"oveables au op,K,sant claimed ,,„der a donatio,, which had never been registered, neither liad there heen any de- H?' Hn fTn^'^'^ ""■ °^P-^'^^-n accord- mglv--//e/c^ had. Cro.sen v. O'lJaraSc McGcc, ^1 L.L.J. 103, 8. C. 1877, 808 C. C. DONATION. 270 m,, ,j-nr}, ronsnifnnnil el /mr Cth/ ,/r, ,/i/., ST^r u''"^r' 'V'T •■'^''' -^'1-1""^" ol t e\e„ by will, and that his le.'alee wh.i ;j;;|aken.,ssessi,,,,.asl„,un.i,,, ;:::;:;,,?; ,,11 --7"" ^^ ''""■c/>,hu', 2 L. N.;!'J7 .fe 10 H. I.. 77, 0. It. IHTJ ■ !)72, Wo C V ' re. i^l/^ '"'/"/''' "•''"■ "'"' 'l'^' "Miissicn to register ..uch ilonation could not deprive the donor o ,l,e r,.d,t of relour ..esulting llo,, A O.iOr ot tl,.- Civi, (;o,|..,,is under Art. 2,0;»s: ,i,,; donee couhl „„t tmnsterany rights in .1,,. pi- ,t pen \ to tlu.p,-..,,,,!,,.,. „f,|„, ,1^^,,^ J , I ^ ing i.imself registered his title, lb. ^XIX. IlESILIATIONOF, ProCUKEO HV FrAI'D, XVII. Or USLFRUCT, I4f,. A universal donation in usufruct l,v contract o.^ marriage is a donation cauJ,Z.rt XVIII. Prohibition to Alienate. 147. A donation made before the Code, with prohibition to the donee and to his he rlto henate during the life of the donor on pa . of' nullity does not prevent the donee from be- queathing the property ilonated to one oi„o.^ a iS,r,H/:''^- '''?'■' "^ ^"i''''' '« "°t«" alien. ation; and that in this respect it difters from a legacy of property made to a stranger. i4l"o« '•u^"T'i' " Q' J- ^^ 239, S. €."1880 i4f< And even if it were the violation of the nditioi. could only be invoked by the ,h' „or £,feiront"V°"'' '"'^"'^ right to avail 149. Wliere a contract of marrm.^e contained .1. tiler 711 ''","• '"'S-'^'*;"' '■■•"'" '-"'atl'ei and ''/mt i ^'''"'^'f'^ ''erein) of " nn hi de "->>€ a la charge da ne pouooir vendre, cede,; 151. In IBfifi the respondents received hv iUes, animals and agiunillural insir,,,,,^,,,. A er he death of the donor the appelhu w ,o U ,„e t,, represent his .successio',,', .iiscovere.l tliat the donation was not counleisi.r,,,.,! .,„ no i,,e, the respon,le,,ts that he „.o,,ld 1, ;,g action U^ ,-ecove back Ihe subject of the d,7na deed "St,?," "^'•<-'>-ares,lia,ionof e V .'■ ' '^^7'. agreed to the resiliation of the r; '^ .''ri;""^"' '""' ^y " ''"^'" of compro, ,i ' of the (,tl, September of that year, thev ,w,i to .submi ,0 arbitration the 'claim for e7, oV' "ent 01 the property (,-om the time of the 'iona lon Action was subsecpiently taken y ap .ellants against respondent's to recove t| "e V. ue ol such enjoyment. Defendants pleaded a the deed ol donation, being by o„..,.o,i ' title, was really a sale ; that appellant had de- ceived them into believing tint t ley I " vai, title, and that he repLentedZle's^ he ,io„or which was not true, and that it was by error that they had agreed to the res I at o,' -Held, that in any case the respon,Ie„ts co ih not he callcHion to account for ti.e enjoy,,,, , o the ,„.operty up to the time of the re ,iia ion o he deed; that the deed of resihatioi k el f "as obtained without cause and by fraud, and t>t up •' ' ' ased t, as a traiLsactiou under 1918 C. C.,:! and was ^raasr;^79''^"''"^^^^^^«'^ nullity or' s,„„e (rtl, "r .o,,a^t" thoi ,.?,',',""' ■':, ""'" '"' di-i>o>i„R s„mce8 t,. gi've it il rect J ,,,?„''."'" ''""y . Who,, the prohibition is „ot made Ibr m„ Ow.,. „ ,• u ,s i„t,.rp,-,.,c.d as eat,ihlisl,i,,y,uvn,r „",'•' !" " '"V'S tAscondunts inlnnit to tlie exclusion „,■ .,,, .i pioperry Rivon by tlioin to tl eir cl jdr ., ^ ,- ""r" coudants wl,o die williout iss,ow| ",',., ,„ i,,."""" •''™- aro siill in l^iud, in tlie suecossiou . m ico "^Jr'" K'ven ali.M,ated tl,o price.i "fill ,I,"e!nc "rC"t s, h^ '""". ^'-"'■" Tl,uy al8o inherit the riKlu ,vhich ?l,,°?inn "■'"^''"'i""ts. had of resuming the propf rty"thi,l?,: ^; ."''S^',,''^''^, "*ve llTransaction is a cont,-act by which ti,„ „ .• tcr„,i„ate a laiv suit alivudy beciin ( r i,r»; . 1""™ .ligation by moans of coucfssiou^'s "V ZJ^ry^ll ^""'? by one or botli ot tl,en,. lyis C. C. ''*"*"'''^"a made a.s it did not set up the legal con^.-ljcVa;'^';, *';';; "hich It was baseJthat it coul.l not be re' ^iX" '■ 'H i-;,,iy- , 271 DOWER. BOWRR. 272 XX. Revocation or. liil. A iloimtioii oi an iiiiniovp.'ililp wns iimdp tollic lindlicrdf pliiinlill' liv IiIh liitlipr, oh tlic coiiilili,))! of his imyiii;,' \,fm liviVH to e.icli of liiH lii-i thcrs itiiil Misters on tlieii- cominj; (irai'c. I Ins was acucptcil liy the (((jiicc, hiit siilw- qiU'iitlv, on a si'iziirc oltlie itiinidvoalilc liv the ciTditoi-H, 111' llic iloiior, llic (Idiiation liaviii;,' in the incantitnc liceii rcvokoil (jv liiiii,Hii aiTaiT;,'e incut was come to hel ween i lie lionee ami llie creditors by wliieli the lornier in ed'ect re- liuiini!eil his aeeeptiince iielhiiil Miidertutdv to jiay the inlere.st on the piiiehase money to res|ioiident, in place of his life-rent, to which the respondent consented h, asejiarale writini;. Later the appellant, witli the consent of the respondent, paid !|!1,200 to tlie son on account of the piircliase inoiiey. He al.so jiaid $150 to the vespondent on account of interest owinj,' up to the 10th Jamiary, IM75 ; and lirr the lialance of the interest, ainoiintin;^ to 9108, the respondent liroujrht action agaiii-s" the aijpellant as hold-r of the land which he liad given to his son, subject to a lite-rent— Ilihl, tjiat \un accpi)liinee of the interest from the purchaser, instead of the life-rent, did not operate as a novation of lii.s claim, and that he had a right consequently to bring an hypothe- cary action in virtue of his donation, as"well as a personal action in virtue of the deed of .sale Beriiicr S: Carrier, 4 Q, L. li. 45, Q. B. 1878. DOUBLE WINDOWS. 1. RioiiT OF Li-:ssEE TO Cai{rv away at E.\- piR.\rioN OE Lease, see LESSOR AND LESSEE. DOWER. I. Cr.AraoI' WiFEFOR, ON J.VSllI.VENT E.STATE OF IllSilANl). II. Nature of. in. Renunciation of. L Claim of Wife on Insolvent Estate of Husband. 154. The wife of an in.solvent filed a claim on lii.s estate under a clause in her marriage con- tract which provided tliat on the death of her husband, should siie survive him, she should receive jE250, or, at her option, the legal interest of one-thini of tlie property nixl nappts l)e]onL'- ing to his " succession and estates—//,-/-/, that her right coiilil not be exercised ilurim' the lile of her husband. U'„rkmai, & lfnuii/7 2 L. X 187'» ^' ''' ■^^■*' * '" ''• '" ■''■■^' *-^' "■ II. Nature ok. 155. The claim to cusfomarv dower is n real right, and is .'overned by 'the law of the plaite where the real proj.erty of the husband is situate, an.l not by the law of his .lomicile at the lime of his marriage or of the place where the marria.'e was celebrate,!. kirh.sni A- 1880 '' '^^^' ^ ^" ^- ^- '^- ^^' ^- "• III. Renunciation op. 15(i. Tlieappella,,fK niece made a donation to appelluii* and her husband, previous to the death of the latter, subject to the express condi- ion tliat the said donation " inairH irpPlli"iO • * nura r,-iu,m;i tant pour eUe meiiie que pour sen eiifaiitx nf.-< et (I iiai/rr <(e son manaijv acec k .i.i-.. „ MUNICU'Ai. COIU'OiVatiuNS ' *'' DRINK. I. (ilVKV AT Kl.KCTIONS, scc KLECTIOX LAW.Couiu'i'T I'liAcricKs. DKOIT I)'ACCf:s_s.e STltKI'I<'NKIIS IN EXPKOJ'KUTION, set KXl'KUl'IifATIUN. E. SUMiMARY OF TITLES, EDUCATION KDUCATIUNAI. IJODIKS E.IECTMMVT ELKCTION LAW ELKrnON OF DOMrciI.E. .■!(, KMOCTORS E.MHHZZI.HMHNT ,\,\ EMIMIVTHlJSIS * E.M PI frrr-LMEiVT KMIT.OYKH.S AND EMPLOYKE.S. . EMl'LOYMEXT ENCKOACHMRNT ENDORSED ENDORSEMENT ENFANTS 277 277 277 277 I 3o;t , .•)();! .■?0,T ;^();! ;!n.'i ;i()4 ,?04 .^04 ;?()4 ENJOYMENT .^^^ Pahk .?()-. ;)(»•) ENQI'E .304 ESQCflJE ESIATE EVICTION .........^ EVIDENCE ]' EXCEPTION DFLATOIRE. .".*.'.... '.""..".' ':Z KXCEI'TION I)E('/,l\ATOIRE ;!17 EXCEPTION TO THE FORM ;!I7 EXCflEQUER COURT .ji; EXECUTION EXECUTIVE COUNCIL . . EXECUTORS EXEMPTIONS EXIimiTS '". EXPARTE PROCEDURE EXPANSES EXPERTS ENTAIL... •"'EXPERTISE .S()4 ENTRIES.... ""EXPROPRIATION 304 304 304 EQUITIES ERASURES " ERECTION OF PARISHES............ .wi ERROR ERRORS ERROR AND APPEAL 305 i04 3{)5 ■■m ;;L':i :!2,'i .11'.-) .'!2(; '.'ii EXPULSION.. EXTRADITION .,„^ EXTRA IT DE BAPTEME .......'."."! . .•{•^y EXTRAIT MORTUAIRE " .S99 EXTRAS "'"" !,^y EXTRA REMUNERATION ajy 277 KLKCTION LAW. EDUCATIOX-S^'MJOMMOX .SCHOOLS. Tlip l()Ilo\vinj{ iiri' III <• priticipKl Ar;tii rc- lalmK to I'ahlio InHtmoti,,,, i„ ,|,iH I'n.vim,... H.I.I the OHial,liH|,„,o„t „f roM.nio., Hr.U,«,U h.Tfiii : {\,u. Hint. |,„vv. ('„„. ,..1.,. I r, • 0,„. |l i H V.c. cups. It; A, n- J & II A 15 Vic. c»|,. EDUCATIOxXAL ItODIES. I. LiABii.nv {)v. 1. Rliicdtional holies are li.il,!,., lik,. „(|„,r Cor|K,r.iti.,nM,(orll,en,.«li^rence,.lllu.inn..r.,|.,.r.M in III.' pertonnuMcc „f Hieir tru-t, /,„/„.//,■ v L''.i Ucrrs lie St. Viatmr, II,. N. (i.l ,S c' FJKCTMENT. ELECTION LAW. I. A0TIO>f FOB PknaI.TIKS INDKK II. A(iKN<'V AT El.KrriONS. III. AmKNIiMKNT OF PAKTIflLAUa. I IV . Al'I'KAl, INIlKll. y. Ull.l, OK I'AKTIt'lI.AKS. I V'l. Hrihkkv. yil. COKRII'T PllACTIrES. VlH. Co.N.STlTlMlONAMTV OF ACT. JA. CosTM r\ Kr.KCTiuN Ca.sk.s. A. ("lH-NTKU I'KrlTION. A'l. CoixTi.N(; OF Uai.i ')Ts. XII. Def.AVS INDKIl. Yi'v • P -''""'' "^- I'':tition an.. Skci.r,ty. Al V. hl.KCTION K.\Cli.NSK.S. AV . Ei.KCTiox Lists. vu r ''^,y'"^-"'t•Ko^' Corrupt Acts. A VIII. K.XHIHITS. >.IX. JntlSDICTION OK ColliT vvl; •^'•""'"^ TO Keopen E.vuuete. AAil. OfFKXCKS I'XDKR. XXIII. OkFICIAI, KeCOI XT. V VTnf; I'/'^'l-UNKMENT oF Triai,. rxi^l^Acr'" "' i^'«'v.Nc,A. Courts X.XIX. Puki.umxary Objkitions. AAA. PllOCKlU'RK UNDER. YYv[f ^^r**"' !>■■ Action for Penalty. YY vrff Sr'^''*"'^'"'"'' "••■ CaXI.11)ATE.S. Y V V r Hl'ai.ific.uion of Ki.kctors. ^^-V*!' Skrvicks under. ^AXXVi. Suspension of I'uockedi.vcs duu- * By this act a pension fUnd is eBlablislicd for teachers. ELKCTION LAW. 27fi '"v V v.wT'..'''" "*' ■^•"•' ''K'lIRr.ATUKi:. A.\.\\ II. I llFATIMi. A.V.WIII. r,NDrE IXFI.UKNCK. 1. AcTio.vrott Penalty i-xdkr. 2. A pi'iml fiction tHm;;lit iin.lpr «pc. 10!) of llif DoiniDinriH KIcclioii- Act, |H7I* will !«■ ilin- nii.>-r.l or. motion, if the uril of sMinin.m.M Iihn i"Hn.'.| «itli..i.t Ihc [ircvioiiH (ilii,;; ,,(• III,, alii- •lavit r.'.|iiir..,| |,v «,.(•. I ,,f 27, 2m Vic. ci,,, t.i /.'((•',;,. V. /,•„,.//»-, .l {}. \,. |{. HI!), S. (' |„';,j •t. Action fnr f|H,(i(IO. penalties wlucli it win »n<'j.'c.| tho ,|cli.r.,|iint IiikI i„ciin-.'.| iiiMcr tlio nonunion Klcctin,,. Act. iHil. Tlic pluinlilf <:iillc(| the ilcfcn.liint ftH a witncHs, unil iiskril liiMi: '' Am villi!, ilmiii' nil iiriimiK ill- il, inner mix }iij.in,iii,'.i iinmm.'.i en hi il,r/i,r, a lilir/wii mnitiiiiini'i' I'n In ilih i/i-rluiiiHim." • All ppnaUln. iin.l r.rWtiire. fnlluT tlinn (lno< in cs.i-»of mlHionwiinor) l,n,,„>,.,l l,y HiIh Art »l ill t" ■ r«" H.M- (nr .h,..,mno. l,v nnlo,, „c,|,.l„ „, Inlr „n l" , ", y ■fll-rMni.-iVK CH.r.s In ilic ITnviiin. in w I | « n.iiM.n1,u.tl„,,„,„„,,, |nu•l,,,,,N,n,,M.te,,lJ^ri»Ml,• I,, ani " ;i..l.M.l. ..f .mym,..,. .,f tl,.. „„„!„,„, „ hlrl, . „. ol^ "d.'r ;;;.p;r;;;i;^v'::r,u;l!!:'/;,,:;l:,r;[^;l;i-'^!-i 11... tl Hl.iill In. BiKliri.'.it lorihi. plfilnilirii. nnvacii,,,! " .l..r..,,,|„„i ,H l,„l,.i 1 „ |,i,„ i„ , ,„„ „| , „' ™ I". Willi' .the nctli, 11,. rHiiit i-liKi.iiilit mill Hull tin- I.. II'M. ,.,- -1,1. writ. Of ,.|,M.|l„„„r till, rol.ir.i til f 111, i iiiiv H.icli Hvil ai'tl..i.,milt or i.ri.™..iliii„; „, |„„( "':"■".'' "'V '""'"','" '" ""■ ^"""'i '""'""■ lii'«t>' ill- a lid w v,.» oi «M.li |.arlU.Hr.-|,eetlviiy,Hlmll 1„. ,„ini . m «i,ilr. .■ ' "' >'»ni"' > xct'pli.'iiii H»ln i.tliiTclvi th.Te»11..r I... iisuil li, any iii'li,tim.m or crin i al iiviii;'",'.''' """" "''" Act^,K«i„,.ttiie,,„ityo\","y,';::i lU'. It^hnllbn lawful for any Crin.ii.al 1 ..art. hcforc wlildi iiiiy |,io«,.nitlon is |,i>titiii,,| („i- m,y',M 'li auains tl.i.provl.lM.softl.l. .Act „.or|.'r pavn . l,v I.« ilelcnilaiit to ilie proMUMit, r of «a, h ooTaml oZ curmriiri'lTrh'" 'X""'" "■l'«V't.-n roam,,, iV^n: c irrcil ill ami about the conduft of miclj t,nw,.,Mit'imi- l.iitiliecon- .Iiiill not ni..k.. .such ..rder u..l..s.Vh • n,' Hi'culof, (...foroor upon tl„. (i,n,ii,„ ..I tlio i Iumi iin' >• •1,0 KrHi,ll„K of tl,«'i„(o,„,atlo„, ciile ■" int « r, "oc , 1 wy will, two .ulBclt.nt „.rHU.„'l„ „„. .,'.,? nyThu. < ,■ (I do lars, and lo ll„. sati^f,ll■Mon ,1 the com n conduct I,,, proawutio,, with efli..M, and pay 1, ■' de? feiiilani IiIh co»i» i„ case ho heac.,uiti..d '^ ' "" „.l„.. "'""' ';'' "" in'li.'lt'K'i.t or information bv a p ivat.. proovu ion for anv ,.fl;.ncc iL.nii «t th,. in-o f .l's!^!:in;;^;;;:'l^;; r.;:n;,^^r^ ^i^r^™:;:;. '/;« iliotnn.nt. r i.,f..rn,ntion, .uch cost- to h ° tax cd v , ,„" proper otilcer of ihe court in which the'^udllnitnt 11 nnllL '".i"'"' '"'"'•'''"'"" '"■P'""'"'™tl'"> for briherv or mi lie inllunice or any other corri.,,t practice, it 'Ull b Hithcient to allege that the rtolendan wa. al the elec .•.H,. V'l'" *;',"""";""" "'"' "1"'^^'' '1..' I'll 'ice Is H ?„^ ' '" ''^ ""--?•' '" '""■« "e-" <-i"nmitted , Kuilly of ne-oril, lu. It bv the nan e given to it by 1 ,i« Act np ; civi T,i''.V ;i',,™"','r''r T'"'r'- '"" "' -""■'■-"."« ^..,.r,.i .^ ,'■ '"l.iR in rein i.,11 to anv unci, olleiice the .1 (I len '\? ['"■'•'■t"rm..>f ofticerin tills be hiilf » hall e Millicient eildence ot ihe diieholiliiiB of the electio uiirt lii^rothcerfonndedupon anv such writ .it election h,,t Heneral evnlence of such /acts shall be suUiclem'ew' 279 ELECTION LAW, S'h'iri'" r' ""'.'^I'lij?'''' to answer ques- ELECTION LAW. 280 n. AGE^■cY AT Elections. Mv tuo ki M,s ot HKenls, as under the Civil w. jrenorai a^-ents and special agents and e u,,a,> lior.zed by t\w candidate or will Is : :r: 7'f , ""'' ■^''"'7'' ^P^-^^-^. acts, an ca, t rr ' ',"" '" "''''^■' ''^ f-''"'" ^otes, whether t,l.e in all the county or only in a certain dis n. or portion of it, is a .en.^-al agent, a i he" los.u that the intention even of the a>'ei't is n.putable to the ca late hirJerf If h' 1ms not thought, pro, to lin li'a.ency Cuno>uk Perraulf, 10 It. L. 651. S. C. 18P0 ^' ^^.^^itliJXe-ho tS-^XS doe.s It ,n fiuoh a manner as to make it ill XT .ho^^canduhue wi„ not be responsible Ke C. Where t'he ciir^f of a countv take an active part „. an election in favor of ^ne of the le laid l,'i."'"','r ',■! "" ^'*'^'='' '« 'I'e electo ! I cared hi inself the candidate of the clercry liu the '.?""'" °"' l'-^"'^ Clergy, and that V ,1, I '^"■'»''an<=e of their support, lie n^S« In .'"''' "T'*'^','"' the candidature, t e ^"'6, will he considered the agents of the can- S ea-acls"'^ Tl" ^T' •"'"' >^« —Ponsible'for a 'ent^h^atel 'r ""■'' •' ^ ^'"'^ '"> constituted oflVa 1 "■' '"•M';"''sl"oner8, in tiie presence of a candMate, will, a refusal of the sacm mentsin case they vote .l,r the oppos t audi- date, the candidate present will be deenie,! to have consented to tl,e act of undue influence a.K o have approved it, and will bedisquSi wkr Is I T"' P''';"«""c«'' «on.e hours after- c?erS '"'..t^' '^^-^'^ ''"";"1' the candidate of the ohenvise fl°'','''''''l^*^"°^^ ""^ '''■■«at.s nor Jlmi/nn / H ^"T^^ '''■°"' '•e«ponsil,ilitv, J/wmlton & Beandteme, 3 Q. L. R 75, S. C arenas 1. '',"■■''"'". '"''''=''"'« '^oniinitted by agents, the (juestion of proof of the a-encv was raise,! concerning a nu.nber of the alleged m^'^iiXZl^SnZ'' ""' O^^i-'on Election, Act. tu??/;/u7^;r,'riira,^v^Tci^:!,frtr::;ir';'f.""^T'"«- liireon ; butnoaiBw.r Lrh,,, I, ' " ^'''""I'lioti' ""cli ""d .na,iH f„ll and tn e , s v,. J o'-'.i'rSr.tf'"'!';"""''' I tae judge, comml»8ioiieroI tribunal "aUsf-otion ol aiients. With regard to one there was evi.lenee that he was one of the leaders „f ihe party in one of the places in which the election neetincs were held, that the resp<,ndent put up at his place and drove w^th him to one of the meet! .-.gs , that he arran.!r«l for the use of the house which he meeting was held ; and the evi- >l< ice of the person him.self that he worked actively for the respondent, under his instruc tons and a part of the time in his company , t at he received money from him for winch did n,3t account, and .sent tor voters on h.V«?" fvi' **";' """">' ""^ respondent's own St tenentthat he was onr ,f his lea,iers, and tliat hepaid him money, for which he did not ask „m to iiccount, and the e.xpeiiditnre of "•hich he did not contrjl or see to. Witli re- gard to the agency of another there was also evidence that he acted as a leader takim:an active par ; and the testimony of the respondent '.■msell, that he gave him money with nst ," t.ons how to use ?t, but without askin-' i;,r or receiv,nj| any account of it. With rt^gard to anotl»-r he was proved by the responde,7t hi,n° sell to lave been his polf agent. With regard to another his own evidence showed tlia? he canvas,sed lor the respondent, who knew le 'vas working for him, and from the evidence of others, that he was a le.ader taking an active that he was the liberal member for the county in the local legislature, accompanied the re- s|)ondent to one of his meetings, and in other ■•espects according to his own Evidence, took pa t in the election, at least as much as an ordinary elector J his being entrustcHl with the expenditure of the Government grant of $1,500 (or colonization roads in the county, the e.x- penditure of this sum at a tin,e when the can- i^. wC ', i'"'""' ^^'■'■e^oing on, and the manner in which the money was being e.xpeiided, facts the in.' •^^'P'"- '?'"*''' ♦'' I'aveVn Within the knowledge of the respondent, not only by reason of their public nature an,l al.so because tlie money was given to and for the purpose of being expended by recognized active electoral agents, whose acts the respondent would le-rally fe presumed to have been cognizant oi; With regard to another that he tooK a very active part, canvassed, held puldic meetings; spoke everv evening, and cliallenged the opposite candidate to meet him-//.W, that the 'ageiu'v of all these persons had been sntlicientKMnade 1880 ■"*'''""'"-'^* ^ ^amc, G Q. L. R. loi, S. C, IIL Amendment op Particclabs. fi. A motion at the hearing of an election petition to amend the particulars by siibsti- iiiting one bajitisuml name for another was ivlnsed, as sulHcient time had been allowe.l o prepare the particulars. RoUUardk Lecuml- ii'>, I K. h. (i(J2, S. C. 1877. !'. Under the Dominion Controverted Elec- tions Act-//y«'-ii Cuiip.J, 8 K. f. oU, o. L. 187.'). If. IJut the non-production or the irregular productiun of a bill of p.arti.nilars will no't in- vove the dismissal of the petition, nor be equi- valent to an abandonment on the part of the petitioner, but has im. dlect solely of prevent- iiif,' I he pelUioufr from maU-mg proof of the ill>-gality ol 111,, votes wnicli he contests, lit 15. Anil a bill of particulars which declare.s that the petitioner objects to all the votes taken in such a parish at such an election, bv reason ol the illegality of tne a-sessment role and the electoral li>t of the parish, is sufficient. lb. 10. The petitioner must give such particulars as to time, place and circunistances us will afford liie respondent fair information in refer- ence thereto; and no evidence will be received at the trial except .as to matters within the par- ticulars, and tending to support tlie same, with- out the leave of a court or judge, and upon such conditions as to postt)oneinenl of the trial, pay- ment of costs, or otherwise, asmav be ordered. Laiujluhii. ralin,(iq. L. U. 18, "S. C. IHSO. 17. The allegations of the petitionmav be ad- initted by respondent .so as to cause him to lose Ins seat. lb. 18. Bill of particulars ordored to be filed in court, and served on the defendant on all the heads of allegations of the petition, so as to put liie defendant in a position to ddcnd himself in respect of each and every charge in the petition, and so to be as explicit and complete as they would be in an ordinarv civil action before the same court, and to be served on thedefeiKiantat least eight days before that fixed for trial. Bruncau & Ma.stiiie, 9 K. L. 561. S. C. 187i> VI. BuinKRY. 19. The following words bv a candidate to an elector at an election, ".si iu n'ext pu.- .Montreal), o imij lieiilili. ni the umo otHce an iu-erl .tioii lor (ue partie- and the record, with a cooy of ilie ileci-ion and auv orders mad,, in the cus,., 8hal, lieuV, sin led X eau'l'^o ''."n'-l'''ri'' "1 ''"'"'"•■'= "^ '^'«"l'-'""' .■»•''"•'« ifv fj r">i"v, .and the court shall .ielerniine and cef. h™i"nnn ';'''*'■',"'''' ''™'^""' I" •'"■"Peake upon 111! se\eial points and luattiTS, as v,i.,l nf (act 'is of liuv XVlni'ed VVk'V''-'*'''' ''r''V''''^^^"'^" I'''* «''"'■ "^ m, I I I .,, !,:'''V'''"'''. '" "" »"■'•■' >"ii""er "8 the jndKe CO, uuii .HI ot lliia Act, and th» di'tei'itiiiialiunof rlin r, ,ui t iu. ceriiucd snail ho Ihml to all inte is a, d , ?,fo es 2 n ,t "'!',""^ Japo^itod as aforesaid shall be ieal w ill,' a^adepo.itmaca:ieofroiiovv. U. a? Vic. cap. lO.aec *. The followlnjr persons shall be deemed guilty of bribery, mid shall be imidshed accoidiiiElv • 1. hvery peisoii who, directlv orinduecilv, by himself Ol bv any oilier person ,m his belialf, Rives, lends- or aKrees to five, or lend, or oilers, or pr.mises any inoni.y or valu- able consideration, „r promises to procure., or to endeavor to procure, any .-oney or valuable considerafon to or for MrL '^1"!' "■■'" '"■ ^"^ ""y '*'•'""' "» Oelialf .d' am voter, or to or (or iiiiy person in order to induce any votw to Y)te (jr retrain Irom v„tini.-, or cnrrupily dois any such Att ns aforesaid ■), account of such voter luiviuAoted or relraiii 'il (rom votinpf at any ,. lection- (?"<•" 2. .Miy person who directly oi- indir..ctly bv himself, or by any other jiei-sou on hi- behnK, civi's or pro- f','.',mL„"'' "^'''"«. '" "i^" <"■ I""-'"™, or oilers or iiomlses any oHice, place or employment, ,,r pro- mises to procure or to endeavor to procure luiv otiice, place or emp oymeiit to or for any vot'-r, or to or'for any otuer per-on lii order to induce such voler to vote or re- .'.^V Jrj'" *'"""'^' <»• ""■•"■"Ptly does any such act US aloresiiid on account of any voter hav-ing voted or refruined from voting at anv elpction ; 3. Kvery porson who, directly or indirectly, by lii.n'elf or by any other person on his belnilf, makes aiiy l'I It, loan ollei-, promise, |)roeuremeiU or agreement as aforesaid to or tor !uiv person, iu order to in■ H'' "'■ '" "'" ''»« "' any "tlK'r person, »l, It ll'"-'"'. "'" "l"'.', '"""'"•' "■• ¥'y I""' ""'roof ui y el cll ' '"■""^'^y ^'' ""'•'•ui't practices at 283 ELECTION LAW. thil\Alt !!"' P'*>''"^n' «<• an old account at a ti 1 e when there was no question of an election act w.thin the nieannig ofthe election law. I/>. 7o./" ■^. 'PP«' . ''O'" a ,)u.ij;n)ent holdine anoel- s 3*-'" '■%?',:' I'-n "'"''■" *';" '"-nrrSfoV lH7i "V 1 '''*■ ^^-^''inio" Elections Act, I«74, lor having agreed and pr.in.ised to oav epeakei. It was a,lnmtcd that H. addressed hr';re'V"erf''"^^''--n''^^''''"'''*'''''''''-'S exneni. . "'"'" '"'"''^ "» ''^".and foT expenses, except on one occasion when beina unexpecte, ly without nionev. he asked ( ,r a H received .he sun, of one .iollar and a ha C t ' h irr:^ ^!.,W!" .''- 'ivery bill ol' IZ , -.rjiose liorse- //,./(/, that tfie weiglVt oi^'evi-dence sho^^■,.d ♦ liof >i 11 "^ ""-'Ji"i oi evidences lowci that he appellant only promised to pav H 's cite ^:i7 'TA'^!'-'' '"•'■'"-•'' <"• "•<■ ^'-''fi'-' 1 e would Inv si.lewalks at his own exiie.i-e i, the nn.nicipali.y is a corrupt ,.rouns.!f , , ' Istsl'a iT' i879/'^'^'''' ^- ^^'■''•'''''^' ^ ^^- -^ ELECTION LAW. 284 2T On .tppoal from a judgment dismissincr mi election pelaion-y/,./-/, that if .rifts and sn scnptioiis for charitable purposes L"ei;''; C! ndidate who ,s in the hallit of sub cr lln it>erallv to charitable purposes are no tp v"? o have been offrred or n.alle as an ind iCe, to or on any condition that anv bodv of , ei o any in, ivi, uhI should vote o.- ...ct-in a v .?v at an election, or on any express or i p h i] ,6- miseor und..rf.ki„g that such bodv of ', or tdividuals would, in consequence of sue m" ors„|,scnpion, vote or act in respect to -n fnture election, then su.d, gifts or subscrjio n a yota corrupt practice within the mcCn o tat express,,,,, asdetine.1 by the Election ami uien, 6 6. t. Kep. G-tl, Su. Ct. 18', 3. 24 And the settlement by payment of a just •Wit by a candulale to an elector, without anv '■ erence to ,he election, is no, a c'orr ujt cr6^- nbery and especially s., when the cauihdate is„ucly swears he never asked the eieLtor's a;;:;'n::e;gl:i''i?'^:''-'^''^'^'-"--p---'i actual V'-rsuuLl TxnoLpi n Provilwh.hvays tlint tlie tisine sill 11 hV.li..MVi:'^ *'"''''' of P''''it'"ff»"ila(lver. °'?iSirF'^^-'----^Si^^r''«""^ reJiiJ';,;?;.is;:;;^,^';;i>'^":-/'uH"KaM/^oc.io„di. voting at a„y I'reetkm ■ '^ ' agreeing to refVain ftom ««;er P...O,. ur^f ;irr:s-f i- j'-;;^^--^^^ two hundred (iolliir refreshment or ornillicts or threatens the , 'flic ion by Ml sel W^^ vote or refrain from votiViR r on aecoim ,T ','"'"'"" * ' having voted or refrained Wm. "'■"P""' <" '""'li perMiii i,a.i^'i,r3'.;EK,-';,:;s s°, r""7, "• sloigli, earriag^e or -Xr ^ ^nve7a^2^(^r^^v cmVdTd ''t''"''' for any agent of a camlidnt,. f..\.*i, '"'^any candidate or to take any false oat li in'sMv maV.P., '."""■""^ *""«'■ »■• renuiredunderth « Ant «h,^ f^ ' " ' *'''""'»ni un oath Is unh shall iVHri,litr„^.' '"'' "^y S'li'tyfamisdemeano., And 1 1 the nom lie giving or causing to be irlven to anv voter on voter ha ';Lvot;J'ro;'f ''"^ "V^^'ing, on accmfnrof s'uch or n /v?sl fe n" f °,nv li'i'fi:"';''''' ^V,"'- "">■ ■"«"•. d"-'"" the same, with full oosto of suit. ' '"""■' ""'"« '"'' or"^nj:;,'?:S';:,roXt'l?„^J&'!"f'-,7''-'''«.ience, nieaniiig of the p^vi?i',ln;oT,hi?t'r''''''''"'^ ""'"" '"" inl^in a^'ny ;var.vferrir?o ar;*-'- "'' "''""' « "^ »"''«^"''^- 285 ELECTION LAW. VII. Corrupt Practices. 25. On a petition under (he Dominion Con- troverte.1 Elections Act clmrgino; t„i(,erv and corruptioi, in tlie usual lorm-Jkld, tliat drinkinj,' on the nomination or pollin.' duv is not ii corrupt practice siiflicient to void an election, unless the driniv is jriven by an acent on account of the voter having voted or heino- b. C. Rep. 21(., Sii. Ct. 187,s. 2(). And that a candiiiate charced bv liis opponent witli iiaving no inlluence is not eniltv Ota corrupt practice if, in a public speech in reply to the attask, he states i/,at he had iiiHu- eiice to procure more appointments for the electors of the county than anv member. /// 27. Ihat the re-pondent liavinir a perfec'tlv legitimate niotive in promising: H. to trv and e/t an uthce for his brothei-in-law, viz his desire to please a political friend and snpnorter was not guilty of a corrupt act in makililr such' promise, ami that the act of R. in relation to the votes ot the Par.- family, even if a corrupt one, was not committed with the knowledge anil consent of the respondent. Jb 28. And whether R. was , pondent'.s a<'ent or not the conversR;^ which to,,k pTnce betwron him and tt,- ' r nily, did„„t suth- cientiy .show a cori.i. ;n.uu on his part to lit Ineiice their vote, ;.u■^ mat he was not guilty ot bribery or undue influence within the mean"- ing ot the statute. Ih. 2!t. The term " six ne.xt precedine sections " .n the 9Hth section of the ^)on,ini^n Contro- verted Elections Act, 1874,' means the six sections preceding the !)Hth, and the hirincr of a ean. to convey voters to the polls prohibited bv the Jf,ih section is a corrupt practice, and will void an election if an agent is proved to have intentiona y h,re nsucce.sstul who is not a party to the cause, nl .r''."!''' 'J*'h« ' tlie "'-at Is not claimed, and i'^ M" .•''*' ^e d.'«l"nlified, that such petition isun election petition and must be accompanied • '■'('(■, fH/ira Note. Pvllpl'.!"'//'?' "*■ ?. P*"*'""" «1>P respondent may elvo ELECTION LAW. 286 by secnrity and all other formalities pre.«cribed 'V lie Dominion Controverted Ele.'tions Act, w// ' / i''-r';- '"'«''cs.8,9&40. Somn- •^In < '/;• fjfl''^""»e & Oironard, 21 L, C. J. -41/, o. yj, lo M . XI. Counting of Ballots. 3;{. An election having been lield for Mon- ■ Mn'. ""'•■''" r-f ''''''''''''"' •'■■'^''"ff '-ep" made 'intersection .5;)* for a count of the ballots bv a judge, It appeared that the returnin.' ofKcer had removed the ballots from the envelopes in whicti they had been transmitted to him bv the deputy returning otKcers, and had n.ade then, mto pa..kage,s-y/,A/, that the jn.l.e, under such circumstances, could not recount the ballots. i C im ' ' '" '■"' ^ ^- ^'''- ^"'"^' * Xo person shall be allowed to inspect aiiv hnllnt due? ^n , 7.;;'!"'."' n" ;'" "■"" '""' ""■ "'SmS,, ' , , o*? outnon ot .such ballot naiicrs is rennhv.il f..r ■: „ of institutiuK or nia/^nkinh r a' rotcnti 'r r' an otience in relation to ballot ,,a|!;.,s, o m,' ? ' r,, wo ?"f .siitn oriier for tho nisiiei'tion or iiriidiielion ( r.sons, tinii". jilace and mode of iiisnoclion or iirndn.. ^n?:d;^^jr^:;^^4:7!s/;i!:?"---'--'«'- 6i. No person .slialf except by ordfr of a tribunal ' mfs u^lZT ;" ,!"""'"'■- f,""'"'""'^»<' "'"''''-'^ c,i.n .HiL,', ""^ <'l''i'""'is. be allowed to in..p,.ct any o.unted ba lot jiappr.-in tbe cu.stody of ibc (■|,.ik o< il .. Crown m Chancery; .and such order in y bt^. a 1 ■ s ibi , mit: "'* '^'"""''' ^"^ ^'^-^ ^■'''- "^^I'- 15' " i» provided tl It on lXu.hl^ """!" '"."PP™'- "itlii" fonr dava albT r .It on which the retuinuig oHicir has made the liiial ?1 /m'I "/ "'" "l'.*'-'" <■"■• •'"• P'TPose of eclarinB the ere bin «;',■■ """.''"'"'.'■1 '>'™'"V "" t'>e alhdavit of , y ar wbscl ir:;in ''; ? J?'*'" °^- ""■ S'-l-'ri'T court „rdi>^ s« ,.?. 1 .^ '■'™'"P' 'l>»"ict or any part thereof is situated, that such witness believes that «nv dennr v [n cr,^ti^,;",'r:' V "",' '"^"^•"'" '" ""eh'elec " ™l diXc^ any t aho ^,„ ,r'If ''"l" *',»I"T'I*'"> ' "unte.l or rejected Sr a! WTl T"'' '''™li"". or timt the returninR In. n„ ?b.» .' h"'"'""''. •'*"'1."1",'1 "P the votes; and in casS clerk of tlw^?,':!'".'!'" "■"'''■;. •'''■ '«l!° T'"'"^ ♦' '' ""»' idd tioii as tlie case mnv he as the case may be, and sha I summon and conimanJi Hn7r. «e" w,*? h H " """ ,"" ''""'"" •^'""'"o ittlnrthe;^ the elppfin^ Ji.i I P"''"'''' <-'"■"?"'"'« H'e ballots used at his^t'ti'r'ci^irsi'.airr;"'''''' '^'""'""^ ^«'"-^ ■""» cle^rV' '!f„H" l^'J'^'"'' "'!■"■'"" '"« omen and ds election »«I„:i I "''' <="'i''idRte or his agent aul.orizcd to attend .sucli r. count of votes, or in case anv caudidnta canno attend then not more thin one a/e," of s,"ch CHi.didatP. and if the candidate and tlieiF oeents are rt:u"i,"^?';,^ irs'""^ «'™'"'" ^"«" »"' p"« •'■ ^"-"^ ,rlpf '"'■'"r ?;'P"*y rot""''"* oltic,.r»,aid shall n 11,^ tm. .-eaiK., paeKvt:. containin./; lo. Iliu u>eil hnlmt \,V,I. ' ''"' "P"i''''l ballot papers, and no oti or ii21n'«'rlc"a?^'r'S;ro'^'?hp";;llir'='-"-'''"« '" ''^""^^"^"-' "' jv A} IT ,J]| 287 ELECTION LAW. li xrr. Dki.ays ixiiKii, A'f H7 ''■";"'!"" Co„ln,ver(od Election- .),,.,.,. ,7 '''• "";' ""■'• <'0"nte.- p<.titi<.n hv 2 I «"■«"";";;' •■" "'.' -j-'i-'i"^""' "nh-.caui oCHr,. . ""' """ '"^''*"^ ll.e extra .lehiv „.'''"' ''""' ""''"i"iic'"ent» lli« sni,l j„,lre t'.Vl he Mm. ,"/„"■''""■? •',""' '","<■>• rtoeumenl, rein Me, , unions lor the secu tiy of sncli papers and .locu SiH B^-'-f'-^-^'- thiV ..."n'ir'ro " '■•';',">""'"• "flfliton iloe< not so alfpr ELECTIOx\ LA\\^. offlce houpH, iiiid a certificate in the folio 288 ,, ,.. , . -,,..- — — ^ ■'■ <"'<^ urn,, wine cnMH iH Puflicent: •' Je .somsi<,,u; praloiw- uuvo ,le la ( ui,rSy,„:,.ie,irv pour h ?«,,. Cnwla, "ni.s- Hpour />■ ,lMn>t ,lr Uivheli,;,, crtifir one {" /"Jf''iite pefi/lon d;U,rlwu a m m;„hud v.- .loiirdlau at mmi h,m:aH el q,u- hx pdUUmmrrn oiif ,r teiiir lieu du can- toiincmeid ex,;,fi par hx 20 et 21 .lers. de V Arle u '^'fl',"!''' '-"I'Mees de Qut'-h'T, iHTf).' lirix- ■"die A Sylre.stre, 8 R. L. 3;{4, S. C. KS75. ;i(i. Ami the deposit of a sum of $1,000 is a Millicient security, an,l is sufficiently established I'V a writing in the tbllouini; form si};ne,l hv p^i, oners: " Kous soa.sifpt.x les diU pel tomnes domioHsle eaafinnnement requix par lActe de.- hlerl,u„s Cmtesleex de Quiber, 1875, d par la h„ leqnd eaulioiuicment cou.siste en nil d'pot de la .somme de mille piaxlres en billets de 1 lotlwiwtaire de eette tour." lo PM,,:^'"' ^ '.V'"', '."■"''■"'^'I'T in such certificate to enumerate the hills (il,.,l. nur to mention the \ a ue, amijunt, niiinher <.r date of the bills.-//, e,,'.',;. f^;'' "^,, ■' •"'^■''■-'-'"•y 10 ine.,tion the parti- fi la facts ol the petition, but it is sntKcient to •illejie generally the violation of the Act charged "t'»;''«t de>nons auss, m-is que nous arons donni le ( nutwnnemeut reqws par la loi aussi qu'appert au recepisse du „re/fier de la dite Con ■ qui aceompa,,ne le present aris ; nous rous donn'ns iialement ar,s que ^,„/,,, „,,,,„, „ ,,„,„. !>tini comme procureur et eonseil des petition- ZZo'^Jib •^'''' "''""" '^' doJieileau aotofliVt T „^v- 1 ''"y"'^'"» "* n.onev or oth.T .ionJr;k^y:nX;;;U^f^'jii^-;',r;l-i;i,y-..'«'- the m.tf^Lu!:^ V"!!" "?■ ""■ l"-e*''"">""n of the j^etition 1. To any person assigned as n witness on his b,lialf. <;n,;ii,','n ""■'"''"'' "''"*« ''I*"'*"' °^ fe'"'" Is called in it ?iieir ^oJul^iil'^^illlfnS./V''''"'^ '^'""""^ "«'•=- plainTd of'.'' ''""''''''•^' ""' '■'"'^'t'd whose conduct Is com- ju,licn''ni.lpoii;':'"'" '" '"« """"'" P'«*eribed for 289 ELECTIOxV LAW. XrV. El.KlTION EXPKN-SES. 40 Section 100 of the Dominion Elections Act 1874 ninst l.o iMl..r,.ii.te,| uh unnMllir..- all coiitnicts, even those ihnnvd t\n- tiie ua^- inentofl(-itnMale expenses, when thev have for their ohjeot to illegally inlluenee the ejecti,.,,, and const, nte a eorrnpt act snch as is proln- 41. lint an action may he hronfrht to recover legitimate expenses, when these expenses are not Miuurne.l in pursuance ofa corrupt har.'ain — Jl>. ' '^ 42. Tiie costs of an election feast after the el.M'tioii has been close,! are not recoverable. /("iT'Tu-;."' * ^""xlnll vt al., 21 L. C. J. 2!);J y. I;. iH/0. ' 4:1 The penalty enacted by sec. 2m of the Quelle Act, ••W Vic. cap. 7 for failure to ,Miv ' a statement oi the expen.se,* of the election, is notincurre.1 where there lia.s h-en no e.^peiMi- ture of money at the election. Gantli,-v v. 5,T^<'n«, 1 L. N. (io, & 22 L. C. J. 51, S. C. K. 44 As to effect of failure to appoint an a-ent for all election expen.ses an.l to mblish ,, ^[.J. GQ:'i:',ra,^'c:^n;so.''"''''''''''''^^--^'''-' 4.>. Plaintitls sue,! Ibr ?« each, agree,! to be pai.l them by .lefendant for their "services as cabmen at Quebec on the 17th December, 1S7H Deteihiant pleaded that on that day aparlia' mentary election ua.s in progress, and thai the contract was an Illegal one under the Election Act, 1«,4 sec. 100.: I'lamtiifs proved the .ser- vices and their value, and that thev were not electors, and it did not appear that they had driven voters, norwa.sit siiown Miat tiie defen- dant was an agent. Action disnii,s„e,l without cost^. Bradford v. Dri.coU, 5 Q. L. 11. 70, cl^C. 4r,. Action for tlie recovery of ffiOO penalty for neglecting to file the detailed .statement of election expenses in connection with an election foi the county o( ISerthier, in which the defen- dan was a candidate, tk'li-ndant pleaded that neither he nor his agent had expended any n..ney in cor, lection with the election, of which lie was bound to render an account. He added ELECTION LAW. 290 that he had ,,ai,| out !?2.4.^ for p..rsonal expenses, of which he had d-hvered no account, not coni Jidenng H necessary, but he ollered to eonHM.t to '"d.Mien lor «!|0 and co..ts, if i|k, court should I'old that aHlal,.mentof such expenses was re- 'l>'i>-<'d by law. There was no proofofanv other '■xpen.ses than the $2.4:,, an,l the Jefen,lant up. peaie.l t,, have been in the ntm<,sr j:,,od fail), roii,d.,mt_//W,/,i,,the..,,„r,.,f,ii>7in-..a,J li.U heact,„„slioi,|,| haveb,.,.n ,lismis-e,| al- to-ether but ,br the oiler of, ielen,ianl, but, m vision held, tliatas ,be personal cxp^.s-.s „f „ .n,l, ate were elect,,;,, expen.^' ionKleet Act ,;,. aw,,',, h v or the,r recovery-//,./,/, ,),ats,.c. lOUof the \{-x ol I.H,4 iloes i,ot preclu,le the ,-ecov,.rv of hiwhil accounts connecte,! w,lh an elect,o„, unle.vs ibe expenses weiv ,n,M.,T<.,l w,ih a. corrupt or illegal XV. El.IiCTION Ll.ST.S. * I'iile .Siipra Note. in.tMrLi'S '!'■'•''''''' f'ntemcrt of all election e-(nen«p« .'I'lit ill will . .i,„ t ^ troilit,ir an account Im.s not been re^^^ni^^^.K^l;^S;;;!;;|'l'=•''''«■v^^''^-'»''- X Vide Supra Note. 48 In revision of the electoral lists of tl e ww.'!v ''*' 1 "•rl""''"-^''"' "'^' '''•'ll""'iiig hoi,li,i"s . ahty n, e^uo usive as 1,, tl,,. value o,H,e ,„.,.- 40. That no one can be on the electoral list whoLsnoton the valuation roll //, I be mmlitl?yi' "7m "■'"•^'I'lH-arbytheroll to I 't qualitied shouMbe on the ebxtoral li.«t, un- less ,soii:e di.si|iialification of a personal nature prevents tiieni Iron, being so Jl, ner in Im ^}''''''''T' ^'^'^e points out the man- e , '^, v'viuation roll should be atta.O.- at ion of Hie electoral lists tiie correctness of the roll cannot be calle,! i,, .juestion. I/! ,.,-,1 ;.'"'"''■ '"," ''"■ '^t'crelarv-treasurer any ^ro "^/'Of^'Ct the v.iluation roil. 11, ^ oi. And, in another case, in wiiici; anneal nl r f' '-""^ *''" valuation roll is an proof of the real an,! an;iual value of ta.xable property of amunicipality lorelecti,,,, p„r,X.l^ M,s>.,,ue, 7 ii. L. ;iOti,'.Mag. Ct. 1875. ^ list no ,',"1 ,0.^ T """' ",' "'" '■^■^■'«'^" '-'f fl'e iiHt no other value can be ailniitted but that lueiitioncd inthei'cll. It,. out mat i)5 But the roll does not make iiroof of the the t' if.e'of '1' *'"""' r""W-i"S the'p,op<^;y t the tin e ol the completion of the list: Ami" the , .unci! m.ay, at the tir-c of the revision ol' ie 1st, rep ace the nam.s of those wlio wete ml before tiiei. proprietors, occupants or lessees bv the names of those who have such ijuality ll II ^'i I -ijj 291 KLECTION LAW. Aot (im.|,.c tlR-um,ual value ola proportv in sulhcuMit la i^ivf Hio IVaMclii.se to the ..mpru.tnr or occi.|,a>,t, (MnM, wh.Mi the actual valuo .iocs not give- tli:U(,uivliticatio.i, l,ut the rent i-e,|uire,| uy law .loes iiul unless the pi-operty hu=i the uctiial value re<|uii-e,l. U,. ' ^ 57. An,l the petitiun iu appeal from the re- V isiuM „i an ek'cloral liHt is, aceonling to the l-lection Act „l QueI.ec, ;W Vic. cap. 7? a uon- coulentious proceeding', uiul does not require that the corporacioM who revised the li^-t in question shouM l,e ,uade narlies to the cause, or «hou d l,ave notice of t ,e petition. Center v. 'tL:'^;;orM:;:;.tt75;'''''"'^''^'^"'^«'«- 58. But the peiitiou should he .served on tlie eecretary-treasurer who should cause notice of i.iterJ:su^j.''V." ''" ""-'"'• ""^ '" "'« V^'^'^' 5"J. And the corporation and others interested can only hecoiue parties to the case hy inter- vention. II,. ■' (iO. .So that the illegal designation of the cor- pora ion in .such petition does not involve its nullity, and the|)elitioner, notwithstanding' this inlorinalily, may have the beue/it of the" 4(Jth sec. ol the statute.! lb. 01. On an appeal from the decision of a niuuicipal council ou the subject of the election istH, It will not he permitted to add to the roll l>y vertnti teslimony, nor bv proving the exist- ence of tacts not established by tl.e roll,' but whicb the law directs that it should contain. Coin cx/>., I q. L. R. 98, S. C. 1878. Ii2. And wlien a municipal council takes upon itselt lo revise the li.sts, without any com- plaint having been produced, there is no aupeal Irom Its decision to a, judge iu Chambers. lb t).i. But when the council has decided upon a complaint, even when the complaint has not been lil-'d withm the delay lixed bv law, an an- pea wil lie to a judge from such decision. Ih. 04. The Election Act, .see. 38, provides thut a duplicate list of electors must be transmitted to the registrar within eight davs followin>r the day upon winch such list shall' have comeinto force under a penalty of $200. The defendant transmitted the list four davs before it came into force— y/cW, that this was not a compli- ance ..iih the law, and he had subjected hmi- selt to the penalty. Marcoite v. ranuia .5 Q. L. II.IG8, S. C. 1879. ^ «y«*«, C5. The electoral list is a paper of the high- est importance, for upon its validity niay dep?nd the legality of the election. No efement ot un- ELECTION LAW. 292 certainty should be allowed to 'find its wav into he proceedings, and it is ,hed!,ty of the Joi r s o msisi upon a strict adherence^., tl e di ec. li'n.^ol the Legislature on the subject. 1 ^ •'•'. I,y the Quebec Election Act sec 27 • the e ectoraflistofa corporation mu t remai;, S thirty, ays only, and any alterations m de iu i ulter the thirty days have expired a e P leLa and must be set as de. Jo,l„iii .'ir 7V,< /" ^ added to ihe elecioral iiM, exceptoit pl„inte.smr i879. -^ J^oi'ljueiul, 2 L. N. 2li7, S. C. XVI. EviDKNCE IN Cases u.\i)eb, 68. On a petition in the usual form char-in^ bribery and corruption by respondent an.rhil agents an.l treatin,.' by respom'lenl's a^-e ts on tl.e nomination anjpollingdays, the re.^.oi dn was e.xamined ou h s own beh,alf_/A,/ / peal to the Supreme Court.% S'^/Seucc^ a candidate on hi.s own behalf in the Provinci of Quebec is adm ssible. Soni,'i;ul}/ )^ t Jlanune'lBi:. Rep. 210. Su.'cT.'wi" ^ ""^ <)J. And that wheu a multiplicity of charges of corrupt practices are brought against a S .Mate or his agents, each "charje 1 oiUd be treated as a separate charge, and °f proved bv one witness only and rebiUted by a, other the unite,! weight of their testimony, w th ac- companying or collateral circu.nsta, ce.^^ to aki he court ,n its appreciation of the con trad ic to y statements, cannot overcome the effoct of tl ^ evRlence in rebuttal, and that in such case e cauiiidate is entitled to the presu np on of innocence to turn the scale in hi.s lavor.^T a icuTai-s llT\ '° ^° ^>''^"'' "'« I'i'l of S C. 1878!" ^^"'''^^^''"' ^- ^«'''e'. 9 H. L. 511, XVII. EyiDEXCE OP Corrupt Acts. Si! rr * Henu-Mbeactimlly and m good faith owner or oc- cupant o I real e.st,itu, estimated acoordiiig to tho vX. ation roll ui force as revised, il it luw beeu revised even lor loca purposes, only at a sum of at least llu-ee liuiidred d,)llars ill real value ni any city municipality tntilled to relunioneorinoremember.t,ittlio Legislative Assembly and two liundred dollars in real value in any otlii.; municipality; or be a tenant ill jro„d (ailh uaviiie an annual rent lor real estate of at least thirty Uollars in any city municipality entitl.'d to retura one or inoie members of tlie U'sislative Assembly, and of at leist twonly dollars in any ol tier municipality, provided that such real estate be estimated according to such valuation roll m ri'al value at at least three hundred dollars in any eiiy nuinicipahty entitled to relurii one or more members of the Legislative Assembly, and two liundred dollars m any other municipality -'/y;/i"th ',? ^'"'■■'Ti^ contested election ca,.e f,.;f 1 ' f '"■ ''^"'ei"=e of per-sons who were l~:tstn£,£^,rt?leP--lS &^c:'a."""^"'^^'-«'^'^^^S 72. An,l when an act is testified to by one tness only his evi.lence, iu onler to constitute proof, must be irreproachable, and mus not h! L"\™S ;" ""V^ '"""'•'r'^ partlcuiarro f 7;i. And in order to jirove attempts at corruu- tion siniply ,t nuist be still 8tron-er.-/i ' 71. .\nd a single witness when he is contra- ofBeotioii 21, u';o„ coin^lailitir;"^,,''','.''':.',"..^.';,'.-^ muk-r either ol tho ivv,- - ■ ."."f"- •'. n-tv I Xo proceclinga on sucli iippeal shall be annulled for i ni»„ ''/, o'i'"ii ""^ '"'*" •* "iionslollowinir and'Vioi'riVhm- lefect of form. (J. 38 Vic. cap. 7, sec. 46. '^"^ j oap^is, ^o? r"' ''''"• "' '™- ■"' "" ■""^•"'^'ed by y. 39 Via 293 ELECTION LAW. 7o Am It, iH not (-vi.lence of a corrupt inten- tion t|,at iIkm el. n,lu>y,|„xH,sim:etluM.l.rtiM, onlcr to uvokI ,lilli,;„l,y and eiunily,,-ettl,.,l w r.ctioM in the court re,Vcted wit [ 1878' """ ^- ^^"■'*««. 'J "• L.'SdO.S C. 78. Motion tor leave to appeal troin a iiid- nient diHn,i..s,ng an exception ,hc/;notoirc 'n?i' action was instituted at Qiiehec lor corn, pi practices at an election under ;i7 Vic cap y a lieoflence was a ,/e///,and that it could onlv poseciued where ,t ...ok place, viz.. in thi .1 . ti, t ol .Sa-uenay and in a Criminal Court. Motion rejected on the ground chat there were two .node, o procedure, one tor the „, I . .m'anor,puni.sha[deasalhni,.den,ear,orH,an,l le her pena ty to he recovere.l, as in an act , br (hht, which was the present case. Tarte v C'lmoil, i L. N. lUJ, Q. Jj. lyyo. XXI. Motion to I{EoPt■^f E.nquete. 7!). On the hearing of an election petition notion was made to reo,^n the en,p,eh', i"> or l" • to produce new purlieu lars-y/eZ,'/, that co si denng that H,xt,v-Hve accusation,; had Ten eroi.glit and eighty witnesses heard that the XXII. Offences under. 80. Ill a prosecution afrainst si.v nersons for jvhat 18 called hallot stuTli,ig-7/,./,rtirsIc' lee Ts „r,/" "-Y^^n^^Uou tor an otience under wt. (.8 of the Llections Act, Canada t Otieen '.Forget et al., 1 L. N. 542/ Q. B. 1878. ^ * rWc 5u^ra Note. to'any'lf .^o»^',',^'""' '""'"""y '"P^'^ ""y """ot paper a .vril«l^n„|;;r!r "'"^ """^ °"' <"■ ">« Poll'ng place ELECTION LAW. 294 81. And the failure of the returning officer to uke the oath prescribed in such cases " 11 ,o° ;l a prosecution under the Act, the lU I e o, the .. ircr ,, he sworn n.,t havin- the etlfect ot annulling the election.— //y ° ^^*' aslw^mm," hh"'" "'*"""' 'l^ "^ '''^«»i"" "'"'•k l,.,t > .'- "^"''' '" *■"""'' "■'"''•t' it appears Iml he returning ollicer had declared hinsilf '":" " '"r" '""' '""' ''«•" ""I'rosentei I r "r. . out the election hv the clerk.-//.. *='* «.f. And the omission of a siihstantial aver- ;'•'■', the ind ctment ti,r an offence i;\he li-iec ions Act that an election was held thomrl! "'l-'ect, issuch as must he oljecti to fl demurrer or motion to quash.-//, ^^ 81. lint a count alleaimr that Papl. ,,p wM ? ;'^""'"!',""/-^ Pnt illegall-all : i,,^'^ ',,,°'^ '■I' the said deputy returning otiicer , ne of liem) had not a r hdit to i.ii? ir, :'. i lacking precision.-//'! ' ' " ^""^ "" XXIII. Offk'iai, Recol'.nt. 85 In a contested election case in whidi the count IS disputed the court will order o 'ami ;»'>'on of all the ballottickets.and w 1 comZe XXIV. Penalty under. •.; except,.; ^^jLm],!:u^;;S;t.S:s S^:tei«:iSaS;ssxj:'^i fcte--S-;-:-;;;n^"\i^ Ob^.xt'^ion^.'''' '' ^""'^ "^ Pkkl.minakv 87. The hearing on preliminary ohjections tn an election petition undersec. lOf oflhe Dom n|on_Controverted Elections Act! 1874, should In any Indictment or prosecution fnr h-ii,„,. inlluence orauy otiier corru ,t nrTticp b.",h in" " """^"^ or proceeding lor any m.,"ltv Vorhrih^i? „^ '" ""y ao"on ei.ce or any of lior t""rrim nr,i/tt . 7, i ^, m"' "'"^''p '"«"- allcKo that tlie dp .ndi ul^wa, at ',,;'"»," l-'; ""'Jcieut to connection with ,4lcl? tl.fi nfllnL • "^ election, at or in been committed Knitvo'Lh^rv „''' "''**"*'il to liuvo any other corru,rpn[c?ice,'d^;c^rihn;;''u''!n' ''/!"'•'"'='' "' Kivon to it Ly this Act or oth..;^ J ^/ ..^ ""^ """"e r«|nir,.); a.,d1n crlm,^ aro "c v "pr^e eedi ,^1^'; "!»y to any such oironoe the certilicatp ,.( M^^?.„ ^ '" '"'' I'"'"" in Ihw lichau -Imli IM. ,i,,Sf^^ • Vide Supra Note. tiuTc',?:',li';,;:,;«i,l?rtK;.t:;; writing aiiV p'eiirninu;^ o M^uX ,r [rn'm^ "T-""^ '" thereon, and Hhah i,, «uJli case .Ji^o ""'"'■■ PrweiiinK copy thor,.,,!- for the p. ti loner Tlu 0,,^^;"" ''""""-' » ther of .liali 1„.,„ th,%art "» mioi «»pI n,'''' "■'■'>' J'"'k« grounds, and .Hall declSe tl^e sa"!;" in a «i',,r,J;i;;7™J.si! 2'»r) ELECTION LAAV. ELECTION LAW. 296 I ¥i take iiliicc lit tlic chrf-lica of the district, niid ail or.lcr lixiuj,' tlic lieiiriiiir ill llui ,:IivI-Uih of the cdiuiiv allcctcd is irrcjiiilar. luid w'lll lie set n.shl... JlitU ^ Chri.stk, 2.'! J., U. J. 2(i(i, S. C. 1S71). XXVI. Pl.KADINO UnDKII. 88. Motii.ri to rcjoot cortaiii items of the .,,,, ,„,i, , pai-ticiihir> of ail clirtionpflitidii, a.scoiilairiiii" I niidn- lh<. sunMf . i,,,. . . i i r ,. cha,■.^,.s a,.i,ns, Hei-yino,', uhicli .oi.ld oiilv IZ \ Z Pro n, • ,i I ? V } T '"''•"'" piwnl l,v ivvaliii- the .-mvt« of the n.nV- r ,m,., • ii ' ^"' '"■'"'••'' l>""iiiii„„ t'f- ,^''-i> mi.M.d,;, 'h;^:i;:,i:ir;l:,u [in;.:;;;!,,!^;sT''vr ""•""" ""-i-'i-iaHy l!;a:;::tr':;';;;;i;''i-;;i::!;i'';ij;;';i:;'-:t^^ •=^""'' ""'>• '''■ '■ "■""' ' '■ ' • ■^^vaj;„i::;ij;:;,:e:.,^\:!';;:i;:'':;:h;',;ri^;ir KIpotioiis Act, 1«7I— //,././,• that the Superior toiirt of Lower Ounada, in Ihe pxeivdsc of its or.liiiary poaers, as (he hi'.dicst eoiirt haviii.' . iiiitthat the h-i.il uf an election petition offered. 'MassA & U(,hitl,tnL 10 l!. ],. (iTf,, S. C. HI). All answer toiin election petition that the petitioner was not a (|ualitied voter at .siicii tdection, i.s not a preiiininarv ohjeclmn in the sense of III., tiiu-hec l-:icctK.n' Act, ISTO, hut a (ItJeiiKe (III JiiikI.i, and iiiav lie pleaded hv a miiipie (h^iiial that the pct"ilioiier was u (jiuili. lied voter as allcijeii in the |,etitiini. AS. Ami in tiict and in principle a jiid^'e try- ing an (dection )ietition, or perlin niing'any otlur under the Act of l,s7-l, is in the sani ,^ ' -...^^ .....A ..v^ii itiiwn luuier [lie c aiises :n tjuestioii, altlioiigli under reserve of o jection, tlie motion could not he granted Chyc.s & Baker, 2;i J.. C. J. 194, ,S. C. 187!). 92, xMotion lor leave to appeal from a jiid"- iiient dismissing an exception to the form of a"i actioti under the lilection.s Act 87 Vic. cap 9 sec. 92.' The point of the exception was timt t le declaration set up numerou.s infractions of the law which are set forth in tlie statute in the di,sjuncti>e. Motion rejected on the ground that they Nvere varieties of the same ollcnce. lurteii Cmuii, 3 L. N. 195, Q. \i. 18,'^U. XXVII. PosTl'O.NK.MIiXT OF Tui.VI,. 93. Under the Dominion Controverted Elec- tions Act, lH74-yM/, that on the trial of an election petition it is comijetent to the pivsid- ingjiidge to postpone the trial after it ' ^ heeii h'gmi until after the termination of tli. -cssioii of 'parliament then ahout to open. tYayM v. Bvka.fAL. C.J. 194, S. C. 1879. INwiii,,,, as' to his pow.Ts as were the jud..e- who discharged like duties under the Act'of I8(.i. lit. 99. Andns to procedure the exclusive power. of the Provincial Legislature seem to I,.. limited to matt.M-K in other ropects within llieir eontrol ; and, niiu-eover, the ohjection as i,, ^ , jifocediire, whatever mav he its Imporlance us .iKcn under the to proceedings helnre a Pr.ivincial Court, cannot XXVIII. Power op PaovixcuL Courts UNDEU Do.MI.VIO.V AcT, 94. On the trial of a controver.ed elected petition, under the Doiuiuion Controverted ♦ Vitie Supra Note. , appy \,, (I iriiil heliire a Dommnii Court, nor I to the proceedings helbre a judge out of conn. I an.l that under the ex|ire.ss wnnf^ of the slalnle every duty that can he performed hy a I'ru- I yincial Court, may also lie perlorined hy a judge out of court, except that of fixin-'tlie ! time and place of trial. Ih. ! 100. 15ut in another case-//tW.J that the Superior Court i.s a court of original jiirisilic- iion of aiul for this Province, with 'all the powers, jurisdiction and authority of the courts o\ Ivci-ole, Jii.s/ire U,„jale, liifn'iihiiil and Coii- scil .Siqicnciin', prior to the year 1759, and siiidi others as have heen conlerred ujion it hv the aws or ordiiiances of Lower Canada since Iio,), and that at the Union there had not heen conlerred upon it anv jurisdiction to try and .letermine a controverted election petition. JiebiiKjcr V. Curon, 5 (i. L. II. 19, S. C. 1879. in*(l,l','mr'T'; '^''''""''' f'*''^i'--''f''<^ t" pive all tile licl.linKs In tlie (litlcront courts coiiLVining th]> que..^li.jii, iiiul i,l-n llu- .laines olil.o judges by whom it was so lieia-iu I!y .Mereditli, C. J. „,t,?? i"'" '■'"', "*'",". ''I'":'''"' potilion, ami in otlior piocecliiiH,. UMOi this Act, 111,, jud^.,. ... liall, subiwt o I provisions of t lis Act, h.'ive 'lie .^u.ie \KA,vvTi\nl- Plpp i m w?ri"'n'"' •':-'^"''.""' P'-">i"'=e in whicl/ such !or sucli trial sliall be a Court of liccord. t By Stuart, J. 297 ELECTION LAW. ti.;ii;iSiKuliSS^r'i^r''''r'''^ pns. the .Unnnistrati..,. of iu,.tict and » con.sutudon ami or.'anizali,,,, ,r n '^ by It so an to Ciller any ai.tl.unty uiwi it t,! or itny otl.er juri.liction o/.luty or. thin court. ,i02. That the ParlNunent of Canada under u.o power conferre.) exclusively u.Z it I, nl! vide tor the constitution, mail temncl^ and orfjanization of a aeneral Uoiirt ■ i for the wtablishn.en o any a l,h 1 T'' "'"' tortlieadniinistratiinor;:^, 'rthlC' :;::i''i^cj;:rSs^:;^; ;jr-'-?- tliroii.rliniii ,_,"'"''." :inn. "'jth jiiriMdiution II roller lout the Doniiniuii,and tiiat the Domi' '■on Controyerted Elections Act of 1874 i a Courts n ^"'"""""' *"d "ot by Proyincial or mend '"tir,-;;^- ''[•''''' A<=^'^o««not add to courts ,t ' J""1'".""" °* "'e Proyincia one of' ?e I -^ designates those courts or one o, the judges thereof as being the court he ELECTION LAW. 298 I'Hr. l.t ofsec -^2 o'ihe rhi^Iv ''';;''';''''■■' '" Act, but regulates merely f,? '^"''"' ••^""■'•"^1 co-uroyertjd eh^^tirs^i ' I :';o'brh:;,r';r'; iH o say the procedure to he follow I. /' ' "'"' orEp,Js^';iSs'';n;::t'r'^^"^^'^'-' 107. And 1,1 another case— //,./,/• fi,,, „ Poniini, , I, Controverted h'l,.;. \ ^' ""* UoNiinioncontes^ele"t !•'''''«'■;: ""•' "•'"' "^ xissess, and has also in . . r " '"■''"'■" K'-'la.in«the proeed ^/e , t t'loir;' ""'^ 'I' c-iHes encroa!;l,ed upon |,t^. 3' "' l^'* vincial Legislature, vihich , os 'e e, witl r '1 to theoieut on, or.'ani/aii,, , .. I '''.*^'"' ■^"Kard cj'vil and crinnnaT o r, ';; f ,:''r'':r'"'''='' "»" 'iure in civil matters h'm'l, ', ""' '"'"'^e- * •"'.' '■'^>st!'7;:zzrt"i::i 108. Jn another case_//p/,/t .....f i DoniiniunConii-overted l-'l Jt; / ''' ''-^ "'^ Parliament of C. , i / f '''"''^'^^ '^' ''^'■^'''e Dominion Cou t a 1 1 . " ""' '=''™"''' a section 101 o I'e 5 , rv''';;'^^'?'^''* ^•"'" ''y and has merely sou 1 ,7'' '^'""-''" ^^l Province of olf."''" ."• ." ■''', ""• ^^ regar,is th,- «=t ,•, !•'.''" luereor astieini'the oonrt established for applying that law or't ryin^ the n.en,s of conteste.i e'lecTion cases ai d i fo ii ' BO the Parhamentof Canada has noteucroaci ed on the rights conferred on the Provincial Le^is tttures by the British North Amer ca Act bu orrt.ierai Court for the purposes of the Act. lb. • liy Caron, J. to make lawTf"J ?l,e neaoe orlr"» '('"''« «f<^ommon8, ofCaimiij 111 relation tol^'l mlt, """^ ?"°'' government the cla.s»e.s of «ubjeo 8 bv hSITl." ■ ' "S"""* *'""" to tlip Luglslaturei of tli/l'rnvi^f assigned exclusiv-ely Kceiure in ciWl mat", r'' i^'yil'.fi",'.'!.,'""! ^"'^"'ding Province of Qite ec" oc-vi' in h'' ''' '•"""'^''^ ''' thesup,.Horcou.rof h It " i tv''^r 'r''"'"^^ Superior Court o?tSs^'.'.^oyiC"''^L'^''' "'^ '"« po!ir to tiit'ilttSd'rt'- ^'""'•' '-^ - ortheHous^eofCorSfeX'"-;''-B XXVir. Pbeliminahv Objections. petitionuigandclain i-Ptie ,.t ..r"'^''^';''' 'u-«ed on the part of tlKM-esno, li , 'f l '"'' ^'' |>re iniinary ibjection. ZT ""' ^'^ "''■^ ^'^ «• 1^. 70, b. C. 1871. Other I tioiis. V. Lujoi'e, 7 •j.oints coucerriing preliminary objV XXVlir. Procedure cndek. 1 1 ■) 1 V' ^'^p- ^ty, oil. ct iM7>i 'Superior Court ,, — - In tliovi,!„ " ib t?^„ V* '•' "'"* '^"'' "•"™ "!"" *•" "- -•- •• -"' '•"^_':?l',»^'."'^"'.", maintenance and tatute makes-'rmotl^r.S ^"^'^ .'^'^ere' the ' T JiyMcCord, J, ^'K Iff 200 ELKCTTOX LAW. 111. And till' (iiijv |iurli<'.- in simh ,\ cnHr are f If |irli(iuiicr.i .,11 liic (,iicsi(|( . iiiKJ (in llie utlicr Ilio-r wliDUi'iMlc.-iiiiiaU'il ill tlic |rfliticiii, airiiitiHt wli'jnr <.'nriuhiHi(>ns iiiv tnkvu, iiii>! on wlioni tjic jwtiliun liiiH lii't II Hffvfil.iimi tlic ciMitotuliiin Im JiiiiH',' ii ' non-elected candidate into the case, vi/., "hv^an election petition conforinulilv tosecs. G am'] 21 and hy a notice under sec. M. Jb. ' KM.](!TIO.\ LAW. XXX. Ql'At.tKtCATION Ol.' C.\NI)IT)ATK.S. aoo XX [X. I'NDKU. PitooF IN- An'tox Foil Penalty ll."*. Tlie appellant Pued the respondent, one ol the iiieniher.s of the Qnehec Legislative Asseiiilily, under sec. 134 of tlie Quebec Elec- tion Act, 2H Vic. cap. 7,t lor the recovery ol the p.'iialiv therein provided lor making a false de- chiraiioii of qualilication under the preceding .sections— y/tW, that in such caseH, as fraud could not be presumed, tlie strictest proof would he recpiii'ed. iXniult v . «. (';/,; S Q. L. Ii. 147, 111*, lint in an action for a penalty under sees. 245 and 24G of the Quebec Elections Act j— i/t/'/siillicieiit to allege and prove the giving of drink or other refreshment hv a candidate to an elector during the election, wiiliout alleging or proving the e.\i.stence of any wron<: motive whatever. J'hilibert v. Lacerlc, ;i Q. L. H. 152, S. C U. 1S77. • On tlio trial of a petition the respondnnt may cive evtUfnco lo ►liow tliat niiy oiliei- ciiniliclule liai? Ijcuii Kiulty Ol ei.rrupt pr,.(tic.i in tin; same niamicr and witli ttie same i.||,-ct an if l,e Had liimself prisented a petition complaniiiij?ol sucli eieciion or ot tlie conduct ol audi caiiuidaie. But bi'loro (Miterln/j inlii nicli proof tlio respondent sliall pive uotice lliereof lo f clollu'il Willi ' lln> Vlllill IriUlHltT lit Jtmiic/ivnue, 3 woul, ner.1 In he at lenst ,?.J0. lJ„t if A an-I H no.. «eHH.., .„.,.,l.,.r „r,.(„.r.y „ttlK. vuhu-ol #t oo'^ \ but nnt A, an,| ||„. „a,Me as („ ,•,.„.. //, I2j Itaprn,,,.rty |„is |„,.„ ,vi,;,.,|, re,!,.,), or 12(1. So alHo II a person in H„t,,Vot (,, anv .lis- .lM|.l,l..=al,„M wh,..|, ,|,K.H ,.,„ ap,,,„r Uy , rr, II c.rJ,y,l,el,.t,H„clM..analin.!'aMw.aa.c;i"^ 127. So also if il„. Hecretarv-trensurer has put,,,, .lu.|(.tso.n«onewho has n„t L\Z o voto aocon ,„« t„ articlcH 11. 207 an,! -'In t ilVK'^arn'-"'^//^!^''"'' "-"-•-'"■^ii.v ■i.» V i(-. <;ap. i.S, Heo. 2.t M. •'i^^.'"'" '!''^°, ''■'"" '"'-^^ \*''ii«l" iiiri'ot il„. riKl.(,lmtwlnol>,|oeH,u,tap|K.u.oMU.rn|| wl.m. a lonant ,l,„.s „ot luM/nc et lil III liJ. Ami tlie cure, as occiipvir,.' llu. ,„.,.s|,v tery. ,s„otan„feMpant in tl.e Hi-nse re,,,. >t.,| [,y the Klecl.o,, Act, as the pn.shv.ery is , , 111 Bhie property, tur it is o,,' lax.ihle pn.i.er yj j, that the voting qualilication is bu«[-,l. /6. " XXXII. Rui.K OF PUACTICK. m. liy a r,.le of prai^tice, ma.ie and prornnl- gaUMi ,n Qneheo, the .;o.t ot p,-intin,' the evi,le",ce in election cases n„dor ihe Qnehe.T Act , v h e JJhe following pcr«on8onn i„ ,.o case bo electors or 2. ulllcors of tlie Customs, clerks of the Crown cloik, „f . ft any ,il ilio persons set ford. In this s(K.n,.n „ ,. null and ol' no I fi'i- ,'. r i;y,!'.'«"'' "'"' '"« vote shall bo (.llcL., (,,, (J8 Vie. cap 7, sec. 11. lilt Is jiroveu bel.-ru any court or iudiro for tl„. f,H..i ELKCTIOX LAW. ■{02 XX.KFfi. Skrvioks iiNDEn. I;tl. When the ,lelen,lant, in a controvertcl ic: ';;■':''•''"' ""^ n.a,leelection olM,,,,;' |e ^ iMUMl pajiersniay l», n,a,|e at the „iM,.e o f ':';■;;."';" --.v. u,,,] -.otatUieelecte, |,„ ! '0K.'l.";i',.';i,"^:'ii?;, ^'•«"-''* ^'^--. „ 'f^,^' •"'i".'-' Piincted hv 2:!9 V ,■ Its 2 • ""'"II Pi''"' Imi-s n.speVtin^r the tr i i oVl'.. I'-'eclays which (o||,„v snch^es i,„s , ;:;;'• ;'l'l'll''"'''''-'''n,e sitting ineiiherl'M^^^^ ;n^uro.;'Spe.;;i,^:;T;;rrhe3';;S^fll;^ na.tp.|,;,,,,,,u,es,,spe,,,|e,|,|,;;.'y': ',,;', ;^ ' 'lie ,c;,',slal,ire, ,( a„ application to that elf c l-e n,a, le l,v the sittin« Im,.,,,),,.,.. r,.rcmU& Langeher, ,5 (). J,. R. 212, S. C. K. I87y XXXV. TaKATixt^ the'lLr^'T'' '!'^ ^'"*'"«^ '" ""^ Pfti'i"" nn,l in ini.'' //>!^' '*" '"''"' '' ^^''''''''^^e of corrupt treut- sec. .o7 o( ih.. ynebec Election Aclt lor a can- li'la e 10 «.ve a ;.|ass of li.p,,,,- to a n iLut ol people, co,.,pnsii,.a,ihere„[s of iKithc;;;;:;;!;,: 'inil tothe ilepniy returninj; olhoer in the „l on tl.e day ol iMdlinj;, saving : "Ge, k neif ' vouwish t. take a^.las,; o? bran', tCi -me in the r,x)n,, go and help Vunrselv 's h.^ heiore yon j-o go ..n,| vote thr' who,,, v ot, like XXXVI. Undde Influence. 4 onptrior tonit ol the Province of Uiiebec dis- ;^'8.-:ing the petition of the appellant °ast the return ol the Hnt> (I i i i" >■''""■'"■ "g'iiii.st ber of the H , s. I'V. ^^'^"fe'^ ^m. as n,en,- lu Ol theUoiKse of C,n,i,nonH~y/,7,/, that tl,P w V ^ Of clerical undue inHuence bv his a-ents ai,r ;,.?T "'"' ^'-'•'"ON.^ a,„l tl,-reat8hv cer- tain parish priests amounted in the ca'se in l...T'isr,ture,,ftl,isl'r,v;[.rdu^^^^^^^^^^^ rrceede a,,,! tlio Ihr,-,. ays wi,,'^ ,15"^ ",»>" «''"«" o,. ,1.0 mere applicati:,,; oi'm'^'j'itl'l,,', '!:ZZf "'""'"'' I e.ector having votj, JXh,/ h.nf; T "™" "' "'''""•■'' ! such unlawful a ts"aribTeacholinn»^''^'l- «,"."'>' "^ pe,,altvoften,loll»rrorimD?r8onm«M ,'''' '""''«•" » default of payment '^^"' ofoneiuomii in Hi 8t8 EMPLOYMEx\T. EIUKJII. qiiPHtion to undue influence, hihI were in con- tPrtveritioti of tilt- itSili Heo. of the Ddniinion t.leoti;.n Act, IHU.' IhoMurd & Langevin, 1 8. C. Kep. M5, Hu. Ct. lH77. l.'tT. A threat by u Ctttholic priest to reluHe the HiioniMienlH to thone who nIiuuIiI vote lor u CHii,|i(hite oouHtituloH an act of undue inthience, within i! .■ terms of Mec. 25H of tlie Quebec Electioi. \et.+ Hamilton & Beauchame, 3 Q. L. U. To, S. C. 1H7G. 304 ELECTION OF DOMICILE. NEYS^ -^TTOHNEYs AD LiTEM, see ATTOR- ELECTOKS. I. Qualification of, nee ELECTION LAW. EMBEZZLEMENT— See CRIMINAL LAW. EMrHYTEUSIS— See EENT. EMPlfiTEMENT— See BOUN- DARIES. EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES- See MASTER AND SERVAxVT. EMPLOYMENT. I. Of Wife's Money bv Hitsband, see MAR- RIAGE CONTRACTS. • KovorslDg 8. C. See I. Dig. p. 467, Art. 8S uer Ritchie, J. A olertorman has no right In the pulpit or out, by ilireatenlng any damage, temiwral or splrltuHl to restrain the UOerly of a voter, bo an to compelhlin t. vote or abstain from voting otherwise than as he freely t Every person who, directly or Indirectly, by hlmselfor by any other ner.ton on his behalf, makes use of or threatens to make use of any force, violence or rcKtraint or InHicts or threatens the infliction by himsi-lf nr bv or through anv other i)er»on of any Injury, damage, hnrm or loss of employment, or in anv manner practices iiitim da- tion upon or against any person in ludir to induce or com- pel such person to vote or refrain from voting, or on uc count of such person having voted or refrained fl-om vo- ting at any election; and every person who by abduction duress or any fraudulent device or contrivance imnedos' prevents or otherwise interferes with the fVee exercise o^ the fVuhchise of any elector, or thereby compels, induces or prevails upon any elector either to give or refrain from giving his vote «t any election, shall be deemed to be guilty of theolTeMCB of " undue influence," and shall be punishable accordingly by a penalty nf two hur.dr.~.i dollars, or imprisoumeui lor six mun'tbg in deriiuit jif payment. ENCROACHMENT-See BOUN- DARIES. ENDORSER. vIk% 9"""'"" "*'•'' .?^"":». «e INSOL. VtjALY, CoMi'o8iTiu.v Notes. ENDORSEMENT. scRn'TioN."''" "^ ^"^""=' ""■' •'*'• P"'^' II. Of Note, etc , at-f BILLS, etc. ENFANTS. I. Interpretation of Teu^, ««« WILI>S. ENJOYMENT-See POSSESSION. ENQUETE— See PROCEDURE. ENTAIL— See SUBSTITUTION. ENTRIES. I. In Merchant's Ledger, see EVIDENCE, EQUITIES. change,'etc!° """'''' ''" ^^^^s "^ E^- ERASURES— See PROCEDURE. ERECTION OF PARISHES-See PARISHES. ERROR—See CRIMINAL LAW. JrECeTpt" *"'' =' ^'*°^"° »^- VVlTKESSEH, n. PRLNciPAr. Bound hv Error in Trans- MISSION OF lELEORAMTO AOENT, aee INSUH- III. Wru of. orimM^n""^ •"i''^'"*"' Of prisoner that the of' !rrn >"'' °/ >"'''^'"'^"' ^ «ent up with writ Of error — Held, iinnBPeoH.irv TiT~ v T' Sp.la/s^-.n.-'''^' Q.B:il79i 32 433 Vic! '■I \\ 306 -See liOVS. ee EVIDENCE, BILLS OF EX- EVIDKNCE. ERKOiiS. KVIDKNCK. 306 RHHim ^*''*'""'' '« SKFONIOUFAI, ir. In Dkkiis, gff DHKIJM HI. iN.lim.MKNTs, .♦<;«.nfI)()MKNT.S TioN,.,wEXTUAI)rnON. '^XTRAi.i- EKROK AND AVVKAL-Ser. AT- I'EAL, CKLMJXAL LAW. ESQ U IKK. ESTATE. I. Of Insolvent, see INSOLVENCY. EVICTION-.,%e SALE. I. Pleading fear of, nee PLEADING. EVIDENCE. I. Adduced without Oiuection at Triai OAN^OT AFTERWAKUH HE REJECTED, il. Al).Mia.Sll)lI,|TV OF. IIL Admission.s. IV. BiTBDEN OP Proof, V. By Entries in Merchants Rooki iHten-oi/a/ories Pro Cunfexsls. Vir I wr'''"'T"'' ""■ ^'•"'"*" '-^ Writing. VII, UEC'isoiiY Oath. VIII. DOCIJMENTARV. A. I.v Ckimi.sai, Ca.se.s. A , In Maritime Case.s. vhr *'";'"^''*'' Notice. servant'" '"' ^^^'''"^■"' "' MASTER AND XIV. Of' LAw'^*""'*' "' Elections, see ELECTION Attorney of Record. Bailiff: Civil Status, see CIVIL STATUS Consorts. Debt. Donation. Endorser. SERVANTf ^''"'**^' *«« MASTER AND ^ptejt at Hold. Yvf ^*'"''-''" ■S^VI. PRjyiLEQED CommunioATIONS. v^.ff; •!«"«*• OF Death. XV MI. Proof (.F TiTiK. AIA. Secoxdauv. vvi ^^'"^^ '•■■'' •'^'•I'Pi.ETomii:. I vvi ''7*f' fK Of- Kkai'ds. AMI. Value OF Premminarv Affidavits. I. Adduced without Oiijection at Triai CANNOT afterwards HE RejE.^TED. '* 139. Action Cor dpiniirrasp, (onndcl on n JarUT pimy exeo,,....! at N.^oan,; ( ,., v on IMP iir i nL, ' . • "'" .'■'''"'^' '*'" <'"v« oil .leimirraire : •^' • '', "'** •"" "• 'tt'l'iK Htipulftt ,1 that I ;*'.•' V ' "f"ti".iP.I, an,/ " all other condi- «' •• .1 ^.r charty party." At the arK.in.ent Dr or"T '^"'"""''eJ "'"t tl'^e wa. no S p ool o( the charter pan •, >vhich wiih evi,l,.noxMl y hy a paper purport, n. ,o he a copy.whde e noM-pr,.l,,ct,onof the original wan ^vl, ||y mcco,.,.te.l for-/M/, that a. iioolMection \Z H-en raiHe, to the evidence when adduced tiat "one coiiM he rained at the argument n'wauJ's ^■^^Utkurst,^q. L. R. iwrs. ('. ii. I8?r dinmL '■ '"'"'•" "''''"^ pI'iiDtiir, which wafl en dorsat.on ol a note, the signature of which WttN denie.1 hy respondents. Proof l,y co.npari- da, t Tl.i« e""-7'"' °f'""' ■•''s-ture^of dZ- or L,T «^"'«'VV^'' •''•'*«" •rom coinp;irison oLr "'^'' J,-''" '"'''"'=^"' ^»'"'°"' objection or protest on the part of respondent, "^i'lie ordT isHi hie evidence taken without ohjection oan- VI eCo-lr'/'ft"' ""^''"^ '^- TI"H «as hed V ColihZ rr'y"? at Quebec, in Thwaite citin, I'.P"'' •^"""'='' Meredith there QSion ' I?iT','r''''"''- "'"'"'■'^-"g tl'e doctrine! U rln '•. ■f'"' '''*■'''•''■ ' ; "Ot ohjecting to »at—Held, that the rule applies to secondarv evid-Hce, and should not he'carried so fa « "^^ render good, evidence which is ub.o ute v 'llegal. Paige & Ponton, Q. B. 1877 ^ n. Ad.missibility of. canno. Vl""" "■^'^^T'"'*' *'^"'«' "'e defendant forwhi. iP""""'^ '" P'-^'"'"'' "'e patent, n use Jr "r^*"i''''^'"*"«'"' ^^''« known and A )w! ''*''^^';r,"'\pla':'tirt-s was obtained. Baril I «V, //iortne, i L. N. 8G, S. C. 1880. in. Admissions. 142. The allegations of an election oetition him 'o "l^.'se'?'^ ^'^ respondent, so as trcause Q L. R. iTc'c. fs'/g ''"'^'"^ '■ ^"^'"' « li M ,'1 )1 307 EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE. 308 _ 144. Admipsions, wlipther judicial or extra judicial, cannot he divided ajruinsl tiip party !,',',u ."^.V"^''J'- ''^'""•^& Veronneau, 2i L. C. Jf. dHH, A: .^ L N. 75, Q. B. 1880. 145. In February, 1876, a writ of attacliment iitider the Insolvent Act, 1875, was issued against F. C. end S. J. M., carrying on business as printers and publishers at'Montreal, an.) apfx-llant was appointed assignee to the estate o the hru), as well as to the individual estates o( each partner. In March, 187fi, the respon- dents presented a petition to the Superior Cwirt, praying that the appellant, as assignee of C. & M., be ordered to.leliver to them certain plant and machinery, which resp„ndents claimed to be their property in virtue of a deeoir & rarenteau, 3 L. N., Q. B. 147. Admissions in answer to interrogatories ■yirfaiUet urtMox cannot as a rule be divided. t'ciloi.i, A L. N. 69, Q. B. 1879. 148. Judicial admissions cannot be divided against the party making them. O'nrim v. ltoh;o><,n L C. J. 287,.S. C. 1877 ; 124,S C. C. , fO linen & Thomas, 24 L. C. J. 43, Q. B 149. The am/ of a party i, a cause cannot te divided against him. MrXidwh & Badmn rL«n""i' 'r ,^"'"-«"'«« Co., 3 L. N. 133, S. C. L. C. J, 292, C. C. 1880. started hy the defendant, or by some one for wlmm he_^ IS responsible. Turcotte .fc liiom, 9 R. L. .WS, Q. B. 1876. 151 Where to an action on a promissory note the ilefendant pleads that the stamps on the note were not placed there at the time the note bears date, and files an affidavit to that eflect, thf burden of proof is still on the -delen- dant to show that that was the case. National In.mrance Co. v. St. Cyr, 5 Q. L. R. 268, S, C. lo77. 152. On a petition to quash a capia,s— //eW, that It was for the defendants to show that the allegations of the affidavit were false. Mc- Namee v. Jonex, 3 L. N. 371, S. C. R. 1880. lo.^. Action liy a depositor against the bank lor a balance of deposit. Plea, that the balance sued for had been withdrawn by cheque of plaintiff. Plainlifr denied the cheque which was hied— //eW, reversing court below,* that the burden of proof was on the bank to show that he had signed it. Clarke & Exchawie Bank, 3 L. x\. 45, Q. B. 1880. "^ V. By. 154. Entries in Merchants' Rooks.— In an action against executors to account— Z/^eW, that entries in merchants' books regularly kept and unchanged during a term of years, with an annual rendering of accounts conforming to such entries to creditors, make proof against such merchants, particularly alter the death of 169 & 2 S. C. Rep. 26, Su. Ot. 1877. 155. Interrogatories Pro confe.ssis.— The plaintif} claimed |5000 damage.s (or verbal slander. The delendant was a foreigner, and during the pendency of the case leff the Pro- vince. The only proof the plaintiff had then of tins case was by strving interroeatories, and having them taken j!;;o confessis. "Case proved but not entitled to so much favor as if proved otherwise. Damages $11 and costs. Fortiu & iiay, S L. N. 331, S. C. 1880. VI. Commencement op Proof in Wbiti.ng. IV. Burden of Proof. 150. Where a farmer brings action against a neighbor lor damag.' caused by a fire whi , existed ill the neighbor's clearing— yVeW, that It IS for the plaintiff to ptove that the fire was 166. The only point in this case was whether there was sufficient evidence in the defendant's admissions and letters to let in parol teslimony. / )• Curiam— I have already intimated my opi- nion that the relation of vendor and vendee being once established, the evidence of C. and the other witnesses is to be looked nt to see the lernis of this contract, and whether it has been fulhlled or not, and whether the plaintiff has proved damages. Barron & Coultry, S. C. 157. The answer of a party examined on J a Hs ct articles cannot be divided so as to oli- tain a commencement de preuce sufficient to let 111 parole evidence. Christin & Valois, 3 I. N 59, & Sanrg & Veronneau, 3 L. N. 75. .t 24 L. C.J. 308, Q.B. 1880. 158, 'The action set up a verbal sale of land, which the defendant himself had recently pur- chased for $1400 cash, and askether person re erred to and on his liehalf Phiintitf adiiiii- tedtiiat the deposition ol' thedelendant taken alone could not he a comniencenient o( proof in wntiii,-, hut contended that the contradiction-- helween It and Ins pK.a. ai(U'd hv the two letters made a Co encement of proof snilicieiit toad init^verhal evidence- 77,7,/, that there was n, sulhcieiit CO lencenient of pro„f Action di- c"n'''i> ,-^"n''^ v.JJcc/ieue, « Q. L. U. ;U8 o. Kj, li. loSO. EVIDENCE. IX. In Actions ICxparte. 310 .1 lliO. [n an action (Imnded upon a detailed acconnl the court cannot <^\ve judirmem in favor ol the plainlitt without anv other evidence than that (pf the plaiimtf h.iinselC. I'/,,,,/,' v. tan-HT, 5 Q. ].. R. ;^51, S. C. IHI'J. X. In Cki.minai, Ca.se.s.* VII. Dkl'isorv Oath. 159. An acknowledirment sulTicient lo inter- rupt prescnplion. i,, an action in which the amount demanded cxceeils $-)0, .'annot he proved hy Iheoaih of the pariv to be clian'H,! eithe- alhriiiativ<.|v j,'iven or mrativelv taken procnnfe^s'is.m default. Fuc/is v. Lc/ani, :< y. L. R. 11, c. c. mc. • Vin. DOCUMKXTAIIY.* Commoim of (,„,a<1an„„ct."as follow "*"*"•* """'" "' .oV-iCH'""'''"'''^ *'■''•'"""' o<" a»v t)ro.Mam!tlion nrdiT rejrulation or «pp,.u.tment. made or If^iued bofore .^^ after the passing of thlH Act by tlie (imen.or ( eneral or bytlie (ioveriior in Council, also ofanvnroclflninH.m ord..r or resiiiaticn or appointment, ma ie or iVsned ' fore or after tb« passlnit if thi.s Act by or „,?dTr , . authority of any mlni.ster or bead of any Dm. ar mp. t ' f the (JovernniPnt of Canada, may he eive.i h all Tonr?! h air eTarn-o'l^on" "^ "'f ''«'''''-"^>>' " fCa" ad a n 1. By l)roductionofthorfi»nrfa ^'n2e^^»■mlrnorlinlx t.^ o?t,5ol'^re'nr'™"" -™'='-"'«». '-'^rZ^i^S^. o|e»;:^:!r:5r.:;!;;;K.-!;>j:s;^?^'-^ K nt nL"'" V""?."'" I"'"""- '""• CanadS - ° "'' a. By the iiroduclion jn the case of any nrocUmatinn of any Huch minis.eror head .ff a ""Sment hv tl » puty, or by the secretary or acting secreiiirv nf f ^ 2 partment over which he presideB *^ st. relary of the de- g^!;^.!{^S^?^^vi-— ;]:£SS b air'r 1"'"''"'""".' ">■ ^•'«''"f"ame. to Canada , In all oi-al procee.linKS wliatsoever, civil or critn'i a a ul.,JJl'tv'i. •fi.''*'"''"'''','' ,"f ^'"■"^'l'' h«^ I.^l8la ve f ';,'*y,V"'P''"du«'lonflfa copy of the offlclnl (!nr,.ii^ or7l',.i ^! "nrtnction of a coiw of such prorlamation, Dri itV.d 1 ?o""."' ""■ »PI"'iiit"ient i.nri'ovtint; to be printed I y the (.overnment printer for the IT,.^ in.,-. beT . n'o ''T' •;"*■""""'!" -'■■npi.eintm.Miteertitie!! to a1wi,,„l '"''''• '"' ^>' "'" '',"" ■ ■ ""y "ei'mt.nent of deo tvaHM»;r'''"""*l"'°'' ''>' '''« ''''l'"ly '"■ "'-'"'K ut.,miy aw tlie case may be olficiMl'nE-'*' ''''"J" ''"'■''''''''■'''' "' the h^ndwritina or P .Han ni . ""'.'*' "' ""/ •:"''y '"■ '"■ "''"■'"•t "■""' •"•V ■. V or ev •''■''''''•. '■''-.'''''''"'' ''••'''Mi''i"t"'ei't..''"'l'".y n mW ?,'"■' ".'"V '"' "> I'""t or in wrilin^;, or partly 111 piijit and e.artU in writiuL'. r-voy 4. Ifanv person, noimme,oM"'\V'""'l''""""'" r'l'-r. regnlation or an- ort'l , < ?,. ^° '"*'■" '*;■" '"■'"'*•" ''V flio Qiieen-a ...inter as t le ,.n '"''""?^ '"■'"'" ""■ "">' I'revince of Canada, ^nv , , T""y-^''' "■' """'"•" i» evide.H.eMnv copy of w ih.l lai u""""' T^i' "'P"'"'!"" or ap,.ointinent r. w , ^ M L ;"'l""-*« '" ''■■«>'" ' " printed aVafoiesaid, miOHing that the same was n..t s.. i.rinte.l;-,,,. ' bate l!;.'?,',''; ■"'" "^"'''"''' '" <''''1™<'''. knnwi.iK t'le same to r B ive,'' ' 'h.'-Is'a "t"^' '•«■•""''"« «>"lio>-i'.e'l <" 1'.^ ma.le n? \Vf L '*■'''•"'; ','>■ ■■"'>■ ■^"'' "f I'arlianie.il. or by ,.r"f^,.i '"■'/.'"■'"' '-'^Pixlalure, for the pwri.ose oY tdu.n.n''^..';''"'''^^'''-, "'',>''■'''"■ '"-extract of any r.ro- netor^Vn ',''■'• V'^V"""" • appeintnient, ,.,iper, .l.'.-n- be .ff, re.TTJ '^ "' ":'"•''' " ••'■'•I'lie.I c.nv'ninV lawM.lly n iv ;•" "' ''"">''<'ti"» he liable to be i>n|,riso„e(l 1 a tlo V ■!;!"'" /'"L"^ vears.orforanv te,-m' n..i lesH nlte Xn, • •"■ 'l'/** t"'l>ri-oned in anv other gaol or '^n T ,.,"'■"■""'"* '^'"'^"V ""-.nhsH than t»., ,ear«. ad.iili ,'^'iTa"';.""\"'-"''?'^«' "''•■'" '"■, teemed t.,bein nrn.i !^ 1 "'"* '"" '■' ''''i-OKati,,,, of any powers of existi',',^r ;',"""'"•'"'« ."''•«» "y «">■ e.vlsting 'statute o^ t.xi8tin>/ at (.'ornrnoii law. dence^ctl^Camula'lSHi:"''" '"''"' Documentary EvL hI^rVI-^ y.";^/-'^ n'A.WKNnKR LA LOI DB LA mKUVB NIPUK n'lf 1^,^.IT f^l""""S'-I-H8, QUANT A LA MA- TrnvsMK,, .'■'""' '•■■^ "*'«« **«"^'« I-'^« I.KPORI- PUOCKS "=-"^"''' ■'*''» ntrpin, i I'instance de la d' , I ;: He i'" r";""" "U d^ll„,leiir * la-atislactlou P-Cnt^ en C^?,'X^°"'' ''" i"^''"'^'i'^» '^••nMineil com- pii nte en tanada, qii'une per-o..ne da.L'en usun.eiit nies re H, 7' *'■''' P'<,haMPme„l ,|ecett« in Imlie rt en nicM re de donner ei cnnsen .'ido,,,,,.,- ,p„.|n„ ^s.'iL.ne Mr voiTrt w''",?"J"* '''".'I'" '"'"' "«•'"«• poursuivabe nersimn? n.!"'" 'l'"MU«allon, on an suiet de ,|Uel,,.,o rrals'^btp?,;'''.-' '••'''"•''I'''' ''•!■''""'' "'■ '^'■"«' ""'"■•e! .i„,^f lo *" ''" -"'S'' P»rordonnai.co si^,,.ee de sa niB n .le npmmer un '•oinmissahe ponr jircMidre par Ccrit ma 2ie"' 1°" '""' ""'•"""• "" '""-■'"Hll'" 'le la , . r'o,u,e sTn.ro' } "" «"'""'"''^ttiie prendra ce te de„o.-i i.m et la a trait A ni.p „ ' ^^^" ^ "^"^ |.il-.-,et ri ccfte drpo.-iiiou ^«Z, ".I'lelqne otfeu-e poursuivable par vole d'ace ce?teoffi."e!::',"H •''"""•■ ;'"'"''"'■ I-*""""" Pn'ven UP do nourK,. r.™, ' ,'l''J'»e"'Pi-l'".iue'e, ou 4 f...,iM.ir caution pour Bu comparutiou uu procfes, 11 la trausmettru avee leg if \ v^- 1 ' •«i'''u I i i'm i iiMM \ ■hm 811 EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE. ini Where the prisoner, a clerk nn.l assis- tant t., a country po-tnia-Ier, wan indicted for Htealmga registere,ilettern,ul i;,ri,Mnjr the name ot the person to u-honi it was addressed, and aUo lor cniliez;'.l|ng from his einplover, ami it was sought hy the evidence of the postmaster to prove a confession of tlie prisoner made after the witness had intimated to liim tiiat he had better confess- yy,7i'Acepm 1,..» archives ot sur I'onlre do la . our oil ri'u , iiim. 1* , fo lo'oMo dovr,.'«p''''r'7 "'"""""''■* -i""" C"'"- ' «"» iifiuoii, olio doira Hprvlr do proiive: si onsnito lors dii lr..oosdu pnHoimou de i ofl-oi,se 4 laourllo a tr, it cett "is", „ ii" „?' I'f "»••■ '!» il n'v aaucune pn.babilit.^ »i ti r ,iu procos pour y rondro tomolirc a^o 4 ,-liaruo oil .'i autlionticito ,|ip I aiip>iiontPsipiiatiiro du (ommis^air. par o« . >,vant loquPl ello parultia avoir (it,-. . rNo o s?,; produotioi, dP l'nrri..r,nai,codu j .^p iiomi co Com la to ,r ,,„ avis raisonnahlo do I'intoi.ti.,,, do pr mirp CO o d..i,„su,, :, a ot.' sigiiiii,. 4 a p..rso„iip (ni.'.Vilp lo't nrsu vnniP ,„, accus...-) contr.. lft,„ollo o„ sV 'lopos, ra d. hi hre coinioo „rouvp ot .lo c.'lte porsoui p o , s,™ c. ,«Pil oil |,rocurour, a 01. m aur. pu'avoir "],- olU int. I r..).',.ti.lre a la per-o ,pii j'a |„|,,.. fl.Jn,H''on".vV l"'''""i'i"'';" '•'at d ain-tation aura f K III • 111. avis ou r. vu M|riil|iciiti.iM d'ui, avi-. do I'iot.n- < 11. 11 i ,,' Lin'^ ,' ' ""■'■'' """""" l"<''>"'>ui-saiio tPl <|U.' nioiition.oaaiis la -ei;ti.iii pr.'.odonl.. iiouria uar ..» r l.r ,1.. I,. ..ouduiro . l',.,„li„u .Iosiroo ,L.,s Ip „ i """ '|U li .- 11 |H.' I 4 lu d..po>ituiii; ..t ..p e.,-,:i,r V ir.ii.p i( soioMt pa.s 4 in.''nip l..s fo, ds aflict.'s aiix Zdui;'"''"'"'" **" '" '"■'"'" "'"" '•■ Pn™„„ior aura Ot' 1uBP-'?,"'c|!!!-r.',V""''„'fV"'" S"!'^'l<'>"-" do droit Pt |P» Jiigp- „os ( ," IS d.. uoniti's oxPM.-ai. InriMlj.-tior, Prtml- '■ rello uuioo, lo .iroit ,|,. oocoriior t..iit i.r.lr,., .iu.' ce sclt 1 eu v..riu den seoiioiis (.recdeiUfs du presout «c"e 107. Atb.rnn, of Becor,l.—The attornev of reconf, even in a noM-.;onin,ercial casp, mav be hear,! as a witne.-s on behalf of !iis client if parole evi.len.ie be admissible. ]fei: />a„ies' //•.w/„;es. v. Fgan, fi Q, L. R. ;iH, C. C. 1879 IhH. I l,p evi.lence of Ihe attornevs wl litem to be re,,P,-te, whenever p.,ssible. Mohon & Curler, ij. N. 2.).^. Q. B. [sso. ' Kill. liaili/r.-A bailiff who has acted in a case may he examined as a witness, provided that it IS not I.) prove cnversati.ms or admis- sions ma.ie at the time of the service. Giinienu ^■C^'> Vic, providing that where consorts are ^eparate as to property, and one of then, as aireiit has a,limn,stere.l proper.y belonging to the o her. the consort who has so administered may he examined in relation to nny (acts con- nectf. with such administration, inu.st be inter- prete.i in the interests of theadverve party only. iT,''"/'.' ^ ^^'^^'wy. 9 K. L. 383, S. d. 1877. 17.. /W(/._Action by respomlent to recover pay S!18 000, as being a claim against the North Shore Radway Co., of which appellant was contractor. The resp.,n.lent was to olitain a re.soliiti.in from Ihe directors of the company a.dcnowledging the .lebt. By his actioi, he or.iere.l that the appellant hail rendered it im- possihje for him to obtain this resolution, ina.s- much as he ha.l aban.loned his contract with tlie <;ompanv, whi.di ha.i cea.sed to exi,«t, the 1 lovincial (.overnment haying assume.! the line, an.i ma.le a new •■ontract with appellant, b>jvj.ich the latter was to pay all the debts of •In any action for wages ty doinpstlen or farm o„r ^S-o'r';" ""- .""^r'"?, "'■ "■^'"-'" proof IIP ,n,s7pr may otr. r his oarh as to the conditions of the oneaiprnp. » fo.Vp.V'i';.",:/,',! tn'^^ '!^v,tx:ii';„7:L'' =' "•"^ i- r Hubjocts to wliicb It is ll,ii|,e,i-. '* "'*""^- ■"■ '"S"^' '*'" t See I. Digest, p. 494, Note, 313 EVIDENCE. EAIDENCE. the extiiii^nislieil coijipniiy— //«if, that without firoi'l'of the deht ivspdiulcnt could not recover McOncn/ & Vanassr, 4 Q. L. il. 55, & 1 L. N. o2f Q. J>. 1877. 17H. JJiiiifdinn. — A ttTitins; \i\ not neceHsary toestalii,-h a donation for |Mihlic h.^cf, wliere tlie iHil)lic have been in iicfinl i:os^sossinn for a ininilerof vea,,». a„,j A: CHy of Montreal, ;i h. N. Wl, Q. H, issd. 174. Kiidorxcr.—In an action on a notf , the evidence of an e;i(hirser not .'^ued wati otlered to prove that tiie sijriiatiire (,f appellant, another endurser, wa.a jreniiine. Kvidenc! refused, and action .ILmni-ssed, but /irld in appeal, that the evidence was iicrtectly ;;(iod. MrLroil & T/ie Town.f/iips Jh.iik, 2 L. N. 2:ii), Q. ]J. 1.^79. 175. 'J7irji at Hotel.— The evidence of a traveller is suffi.iiont to e;-tahlish not only the value, Imi tlie liict that things have been sloUn In III liif room at a hotel. Graiiith & Geriken, 21 L. C. J. 205, Q. JJ. I87G. XV. Parole. 314 1(G. In an action a<.'ain.st a principal on a power ot attorney, parole evidence is not ad- niipsible to show that tlie agent was authorized to do more tlian was expressed in the written iiistrunient. Serr^. ,IH St. Mm et riy & Metro- pdikin Bank, 21 L. C, J. 207, S. C. 187(;. 177. In an action on a policy of marine in- Piirance, tht, plaintitf wi.sjied to prove a con- versation between himself and the ajjent of the (lelendants, when the policy in question was applied lor, tlieobject of proving that conversa- tion being to sliow the meaning which tlie piuties tiiemselvea attaclied to the words " tlie ves.-el to go out in tow ••—Held, tiiat aithoii.rh ambiguous terms in a written in.strnment may tie explained by parole evidence oia usage, tliev cannot be explained by parole evidence of a conversation which took place when the con- trail vyas niade Counollu v. Provincial Imur- pnn a pinn hikI neelticii ,0118 at a fixed nrlce I o p«nni t claim n„y «,|,li.lo.„Hl «„m. upon the ^roinulnV .* S?' self was called as a witness, and was asked if lie liad not exeeuiel the lease in question in order to give the lessee (the plaintiff) the righ' to vote at an election then imminent— //f/,/ tliat the question would be allowed, seein" that itwasthe j.iirty himself interrogated. "Bonii; V. lioiiiii, '.) 11. L. ;!72, S, C. 1877. 1.^2. Parole evidence will be admitted tj .Mio>v that^ a prom .sory note was not paid, aiilioiigl, t.iedeotor has the note in Ins h-Vnds Orenicry. J'ot/iier, .S Q. h.R. ;!77, Q. 13. 1877.' 18.i. A guarantee bv the awms of a joint stock company, to take pavment of a subscrip- tion ol shares in iMendi'andize, ciimiot he proved by parole. Compwjnie ,1c Xari,/atio,i 1878""' '"'"'"" ^ ya!ois,2L. N. 27,' S. C. 184. Parole evidence may be admitted to prove the value of an architect'.s services. /I'ov V. fliiol, 2 L. iV. 347, S. C. 1879. I'^u. Plaintiff sued by|j<,lliecarilv for §3'' balance due upon a noiarial ohligat'ioi; for $72 —Held, that payment cnuld he pi-o\ed Wi ul^% C "l87T' '''^"^"^ ''■ ^"^'' ^ ^ ^" ^^• 18G. In a suit between rate.paypr«i and school conimi.ssioneis to set aside a .-ale of land tor school taxes, the ;act that the ratepave.s are dissentients, and tlie orL'anization 01 a Coi- poratioii ol di.-senlient school tru.nees may be proved by verbal tertimonv, where it is evident l>y receipts U>r school taxes gi-aiited by micIi ilisseniient Corj.oration in favor of .said rate- iiayers during a series of years and bv oti.pr circumstances tliat such a Corporation has dejacto existed, and claimed payment of school ta.c-W, that his evi/ence alter he had ceased to 1« agent and executor could not be received. PinsonnemUt & Desjar- dins, 3 L. N. 29, & 24 L. C. J. 100, Q. B. 1879. '% ,• .il i ■'¥ 1 •M tlt&^Ii 315 EVIDENCE. 1H9. J'lie pi';.'aj:oiiipiit Ijv a railway coinpanv ofiicivil ',-..L'iiif(M- l(ir till"' fitiiistriK^tioii ol' the railway ih a coiiiincrcial nmttfr, uml niav Ik- provff l;y v.Tl.iil losri.iioiiv. Lcc,eii (h- Cimsfnirlion ,le Scmlannes & JJirt'iK !/(mun/iec.s\:i L. N. 7i), 8. C. IHHO." lUl. In an action airain-t tiic trari-feror of a c am, witli j^xv.ir.iuU'i'- IM,l, tliat tlic property 01 the (iolitorsh.mld have hecn lirst .ji-cns.seii U8 the Misolvahilitv of the .iehtr • eo "not he prove,! I,v wiinesvcs. LuMle & ^Vfwc, . lO R. L. 545, H. C. K. 1880. 1!>2. Payments of a sum excee.lin^ (ifiy dol- lars, as the total arrears of interest on two ohhpitions, and the creditor's aeknowled-nienl to that etiect, cannot he proved hv verhaftesti- irumy. Moutc/utmps & Pernui, 3 L. M. 8.)!*, b. L. IS80. 1!W. The plaintit}' placed a horse with defen- dant 10 past tire, and while there a person who had lieeii 111 the employ of plaiiititfcame and repre- sentin.,' that he had anlhoritv from plaintiff took It away and ran oil" to the States. Defen- dant heinsr e.xaiiiined ncknowledL'ed the c.epot hut set up these facts as exeniptinf: him from liability— //eW, that as it was not a commercial case, neither the dfp.a nor the restitution oouM be proved by witnesses, ami the answer of the delendant could not be divided a^'ainst him '. Q.,"n"/.'^, '-"OiHin, 3 L. N. 8G, & 24 L. C. J. ZvZy C. C 1880. EXCEPTION DILATOIRE. 31G XVIir. PiiooF OF Title. 197. [ii an action iic^/aloire the plainlilF i^ not bound to prove the reiri-trati.in of the will under which he claims. Tela ct Gibb, 10 K. L 48.!, Q. B, 1880. XIX. Skcondaby, 198. Prisoner was accused of having set fire to his workshop, which was insured (or §400 in the Citizens Fire Iiisuram'e Co. of Montreal Ihe only proof a^-ain.st him was his contessioii to three witnesses. The ai;ent of the companv was put ui the lio.x to prove Ihe insurance and produceil a iiiemoramluni of the policy, the oritrinal policy having after the claim wa's'imid ban, sent to the head ollice of the company in •Montreal-/'^;/,;, that no secondary proof of M,e contents of an insurance policy will be allowed when theori.'inal [lolicy itself, "thoi-'h deposited in another district, could have been obtained Juyiiiu V. Bmnis.ia, S Q. 1,. R. 359, Q. B. 1877! XX. Sermext Si'ppi.KTomE. XVI. Pbivileoed C0.M.MUMCAT10NS. 194. Durinfi the trial of a controverted elec- tion petition, a witness, a farmer of the villa.re ot Berliner, was a'"''''''">• "*"'<"• '•' ">• "Pon any iHiKi ttluch slinll have been so conceded to him. 2. From the time of the occupation ofanv lot of lanrl ?"."the''Zls of'r'o^r'" follo« ing^'tln.- l"s"ie of ^atent^ 10 ine lands of settlers concede i and granted nq biVup an K ':fl^lr/!'''*i\"r^'V''»'' "''''^"""^^^^^^^^^^^^^ iJi,.?; A "''' "I (^Ivil Procedure, be eNonipt from cn'uT?.. 'J?^',.."'!^ writ of execution iUued out ol a.^ (-ourt ivSistKonvi.r in tlils Province, viz; thldT&''.d"ifi^',7mii';'."'*'*'^*'' '" "^"'""'^ "«« "y debtor and'hlsfe^l?;.'^ ordinary wearing apparel of the ■m is *l i A! 319 EXECUTION. it n.mi „ i" ''•"'f'' ■' "•■"'« Government at so «e a ,1?. ',?, " ""^^•' Jl-r-loyee who.e nalnrv is <1er 5 O "1 '"h'.,?,^ y^' '^ '2.' Lepine & dan- inter, a y. l. k, 217, C. C. ISTQ. proVH!.!l''fnT"'''\ '"'''• """"• ""h, flour and vogota-IPg she.-n"7v '■"""?' "■■ J"." "'•a'l^l't oxen, tour cows siv ?■ The .'li I,". ;i:"l'"''"'- ImplementH of agricultm.. above th.T4 Lryear" shalfh"^, InSf' "J^J'T "^" """^ lay often years rt,'w.,,,i ''"'''''™''''''* '^^""' "'« 'le- tione,i in sSn two ;:/;;;,i^':vVr''' "* '"" ""•'"" "«"- cifilrt'ren 'S hX' o/,'i''";'r.V''''''" "P^'V »" •'"> "'''ow. veuentatives. ^" "tltleras coiiBtltutii.g his ro- OF*-n.KVA°,."„'','i°'"* "A'"-K TO SBIZDRB A PORTION 2kS ^'^'-^n'''-^ O" PUBLIC OWCKBS AND EMPLOY^ pub ic ^e^van't^' ^^.'Zt^ ,""" *"•"' !° "('come due fo all sl.all be MHb?e toJizTrfjJ.^o '" "" ?'•<»■""=«'"• Quebec j^^. Ihe ,H,rt' -""^^l'-? one per annum exceediiiR two thousand dollars Bamldol|;'r^^lra';;^um°"''''^''''"^«-^«««'''"«t'^°'''<"'- Bhiil be'iS anS'adiS'diZ^V'"''"") "^"'^ '"'"" '»'"'09 in r,Iat n to ailachrn,m^t "P"" "."'" "'"""er usual up^n an?ii;ft"wi';h ^he•hl^''"^"i'™""' .""all be served day of s rvice and Ifflv ,' ■'™'l'' " "^e^'Tatlo" of the deJiarHtlon ' ^ •"* signature at the foot oJ such in^which 'Ihi'lrr ''"P^'y ''«"'' "<■"'« dopartmerf ■ .^ce "eirtmakiLlH''^T *'*?'''''''' ''*'K»™''>''nf'"t' ^ ■ ' In norttI,Ti?„ '^ *?'"''^''''*'""""• employee, be- ment by varnis iment JT-'J-i "/ isstimg a writ of altach- "/ gurnisnment, to produce a sworn statement of EXECUTION. 320 wm/L ^i' "? ?f P^^i'-io" based on a clause in a V ' by winch ifie property seize,) ,.v,.'- ,ie,.'an.i o be exe.npt fro,,, mznre-HeM, tf,ut ,ts tl jn lK,.,e.,t w.i,s lor n.oney a.lvant...,i t.. D,..y tl e •lebta of the testatrix herself, an,i a. sho" /j ' power to prevetjt the property of f,er h.c J m,^ om be,,,.; liable for f,er debts, thtU the,m,,o..i- tioi, tntist be diHtnissed. Oidarin Hnnl- v 'Lv- "%'^}- (yP'xea,:, 1 L. a' 279,8 U. l),7H To .",''■''"' ^"''i"" -'^«t of 1*^76,39 Vic [ cap. 18,' the nKM.eable etr.cts of I, ,.'a„s a e" '■^''"'Pt frotn s.,r.ure, and th. fact that en Indian .>ii trayriting authorizes the payment thereof o.^fnf'.r'' '" „«[• i*'°'h'"« in ibe preceding secH-.n t elTect of preventing the attachment by , tlie part of the salary liable to seizure ii ot this Act, and in the event ",ch , authorizatiini (jiven under the . ^^ become null and of no effect, ' to their . fe the ^: lentof ■'"ction one hmeiit the ction shall • No presents given to Fndlani' ,,■ on-treatv Indiniis nor any property purchased or a^ d w^tli or bv means of any aniniifies Krant^-d to i . ' ■ . -vLnv nart th.reof or otherwise how8oevw,a,..A . V ^o"^, nf o;?ir,^^;!,?',s iii^irr^^^r i-'^^' ^'^^^ !^v. 321 EXECUTION. ami an opposition founded on tlie isnue and Her- viceol Huch writ without necurity will l,e reject i ii. N. IJO, & 22 L. C. J. 41, S. C. 1878. V^'II. Or Bank Shares. 218. Bank shares cannot be taken in execu- '. .-^ "y '|i«""s o( »«(.v;ca;Te< alter judgment, Uu r-.tof^'""?^ contbr.nably to Art. 5GG o e IX. OP Judgment. 219. Against universal legatee.— The resmn f:::,i"^'r'^^j"<'g'"-'t4i"Htthe;;pHC a « mow, n iier quality of univer«4l usu- fructuary legatee of her husband. A wr t .! execution in the Englinh language iasued u,„ler such judgiuent, w which tl.e appelTan was described as widow of » * • ";. EXECUTION. 322 to him to appear and to show cause whv he should not be condemned personallv 7tl e costs of tlie petition and removal of tie "tec s 5?'t'c \m • ^ ^- ^•'^' ^ ^aV. c j: XI. Second Seizitre. of' her late husband. To the "seizT.re made un- der such execution she oj.posed, on the iiround a iv 'irn"^ «ei.ed befonged to her p^eTsl! aN>, having been purchased by her with her own proper money since the death of her hus- ban, , and that it was not liable under a j jir- ther that being condemned as universal usu- ructuary she could not be seized under a wr"t describing her as universal legatee. Held disn.issing the opposition on k.tli these grounds! but without costs, as the execution had issued L:c:T;i'r: Q/^B.trs. ''-'^^"^ * "^^'^-^'^ 220 Ordering an account.~The plaintitTol)- tainedjudgn.eut ORlering an account to be ren- ,tC U /'•'" /''.-"''^ "^^r- «»"J condemning the sum. 1 ledetendant rendered an account which XVlT fif',"" "'"/'°" •** ''■'•^«"''"'' Some time afer i,e hied another, which was also rejected. ex cution '"/"^- ^i: ^°^«"',l'" l-laintilf issued execution, and subsequently the defendant obtained leave to tile anothei- account. Held oil opposition, that execdtion did not lie d'e plauo in sud. case, and the seizure was set •isKle. Les Cure, etc., v. Iinhilla,-i1 •> I m 23«, Q. B. 1879. Jcooiuaia, I L,. N. . ^21. Which have been settled.— Where a jiKigment creditor has accepted notes in settle- ment ol his claim there is no novation, but the creditor must tile the notes with his L before RL"l2?VBr]8'77.- ^'""-"'^ ^«>--> 10 X. Removal of Effects. 222. Order granted the bailiff to remove the el ects seized from the possession of a person w"at.o:;r^''' ''"J.^«"«1'' (thedetendanTwh" ;as appointed guardian having left the countrv), ae toiite I, jorce necessaire," a copy of the ojxIeMo be served on the dete'nteur, with notice 22,S. Judgment declaring absolute a rule lyamst the assignee for colurainf %trcJ,Js The assignee inscrilK!,! for review^ The as! 01' Jul ' »;' s^ii'ir-'r ' ^y j"''«'"e-"of the 2?st o July to sell the etiects of the insolvent with- n fifteen days; and at the expiration of that tmie he was called u,wn to shew cause why he should not be held to be in contemp of cm, He answered that the rjelaioner h^i sei/ed he Soodsand chattels of the insolven by L' e yayene,n two cases, and that they were i the possession of a guardian. The suits L rent had been .net by incidental demands for da. agesarismg out of the inexecution by the I 4sor o IS obligations; and these procJediUs had ad he eltect of dispossessing the as iMieeof the thing» se.zed, anil he could not oU^y the order ol the court. The petitioner's reply t^ h.s was that ,t was quite true the seizun^ had taken place, but that the assignee hi.,"e f was miulea party in the case, aifd they h^ bee, Hmed 1.1 his possession. The onl/pomt was whether the .,ai.-,-ie yagerie dispossessed he assignee who was in possession ^ thel^me o^' he seizure. Held, that it did not. Jud ^ ent conhnned with costs against the party i,rscrib- 22 i. Where a seizure of land was opposeil on S aifrr "1 ° "'V ''""'""i "'''^"-'' which It a^" peaied had also been opposed, a.id the writ re- turned into court pending the contestation of the opposit.on-/A.W,that the second seizure should be ma.ntained. McLaren & Drew. 2 L N. 388, 225. But in another c&se— Held by the sar.ie court that the sher.tf should have^ oted t e second writ as an opposition, and that le Sr^r'" '^ "■""''^ -' '-'''• ^'«"- v! 226. Where a bailiff, holding a warrant of a d.s ric ...ag.strate for a fine and costs! seized L h^p ••''i'' "" ?'' "°' '"'*"''*»« "'« ^'"ount ;t • T^ o V'.*' ^^^ ««*^"'"^ seizure was good. S. C.'k fm "*' ^ ^- ^- ^^'^' * 23 ^- C- J 250, XII. Writ Lapsed by Delay. 227. A writ of execution issued on the 16th Ap 1 .returnable on lhe31stMay. On the 18th April the seizure was made and oppositions were h ed, which on the 13th May were disn ised on. notion tor .nforn.ality. On the 17th July theplaintirt iss.ied a venditioni exponas The return day of the Hrst writ had expired, ad ...ore than two .nonths had elapsed between the return day and the date ot' the vmdftioni exponas-Held, that if the seizingparty Ses no proceed before the return day, the writ TanZ un ess prolonged by a judge'^ order. wluhTut havi. g been done the venditioni exponas must he ir." fi 323 EXECUTORS. 228, But in a subsequent casp hetweon tlie same parties, in wliicli the wariie point aioHe, but III wliKtIi the plaintitf appearai lo bave made all due dilii.'ence, and to liave been pre- vented only t'roiii lakinii bi^ vemUUoni I'xpunu.i by oppositions wliieli tbe defendant bad inter- posed to tbe execution of tbe wrh—JIdil, tbat venditi„ni was properly issued allbouf,'!! tbe return ,iay of tbe first writ bad passal. lb., 3 L. N. 117,S. C. K. 1880. EXECUTORS, ril. Destitution of. 324 EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. I. LuiiiMTV OF Mkmbers, see ACTION en Gabantie. EXECUTOES. I. Account of. II. Action hy for Legacy due themselves MAY HE SET OFF HY DeuT DUE BY THE.M PER- SONALLY. III. Destitution of. IV. I.NVESIOKY MAnE BY. V. Investments maue by. VI. Liability of. VII. i'owEiis OF UNDER WiLLS, see WILLS. VIII. Kiohts or. I. Account of. 229. Action by appellant, as universal legatee of liis wile, Ibr an account to be rendered by tbe respondents of tlieir administration of tbe property ol tbe deceased, and for tbe partake of a certain iniinoveable belonging to the succes- sion of bis deceased wife's motber— //e?rf, tiiat as to tiie ininioveable, wbiob was alleged to belong to various commercial partnersbips, tbe appellant could bave no rigbts tberein, so Ion" as tbe affairs of tbe said commercial firm ba3 not been linuidated. Chevalier & Cuoillier, 2 L. N. 239, Q. B. 1879. 280. And held, also, tliat as to certain real estate alleged to belong to bis deceased wife's fiilber, and to bave been sold by tbe sberifi' at the suit of tbe respondents, and to bave been bought, in liy themselves, the appellant could have no right tberein so long as the said decret had not been set aside. lb. II. Action by for Leoacy due themselves MAY BE SET OFF BY jJebT DUE BY Til. M PER- SONALLY. 231. Action by a testamentary executor for the dividend on shares, the usufruct of which was bequeathed to himself and his sister. The delendants tendered tbe part due the sister, but as to the part due tbe plaintiff set up in com- pensation a debt due by him to defendants— Meld, that although the action was brought in Ins quality as executor, the defense was well founded, notwithstanding there was no partition of bis sli.-irc from his sister's. Gnw ii, Utie'jec i Bank, 5 Q. L. R, 92, S. C. R. 1879. | 2,32. Action to deprive of their office four e.xecutors appointed by a testator i;)r the ad- ministration of bis succession. Reasons alleged were incapacity of some of tbe defendants, reliisal to act on the part of two of them negligence and bad ndiuinistratio!-— /A;/-/, dis- missing action, that the evidence would require to be very plain to JMstify the destiliitioii of tbe executors from tbe iidffice a few months after they liad entered upon their admiiiislraticn Giiiffms V. lirillon et ai, 3 L. N. 183, 8. C. loHO, IV. Inventory made by. 233. An inventory made bv a testamentarv executor or universal lefjafee in perfect good faith IS not invalidated by tbe omission of un- iinportaiil liirinalities. ArchambmU k Citizem Inmiraiice Co., 3 L. N. 41G, «fe 24 L. C. J. 293 S. C. 1880. ' V. Investments by.* VI. Liability of. 234. Respondents, representing one of the universal residuary legatees of W. D., sen., sued appellants, as joint testamentary executors of the said VV. 1)., sen,, to render a"n account and pay over the balance of tbe estate in their hands. On a debuts de nnnpte the total value of tbe estate was proved to be worth $44,525,05, Of this amount appellants, in their said capacity as appeared by an account rendered by tlieiii i?,n^,P.°?''^''''''" *''' «1'^.510.,33. The balance! *30,01u.,i3, appeared by the books of W. D. & Co. to be due to the estate of W. D., sen," by W. D.. jun., oneof the executors, and t> have never come into the po.-se.ssion of tbe other executors— //e/(Z, that under Art. 913 ol the Civil Code,t appellants wer' jointly and sever- ally re.spon.sible only for th.- amount tbev took po.s.se8Sion of in their joint capacity, ami there- lore that W. D., jun., alone was re.spon.sible for the amount of such balance. Darliiii] it lirown -1 S. C. Rep. 26, & 21 L. C. J. 125; Su. Ct. 1877. *See Administrators Supra, p. 39. t If tliere be several joint testamentary executors witli tlie Biune duties to perform, U.oy liare all eou,, po«er8, and must act tOKether, unle.-s the testator 'has otlieiwise ordained. (iVevertheless if any of tliem be absent, those wlio are in the place may perform iilone acts ot a conservatory nature, and o-hers requiring di.i- patch ) the executors may al.so act Keiiprnliy as attor- neys lor eacli other, unless the intention of the tesitator appears to the contrary, and subject to the responsibilitv ol the one whORrants ilie power. The executors cannot delegate Kcneraily the execution of tlie will to others than their eo-execulors, but they may be repre ented by attorney for determinate acts. Executor.^ exercisiuK the.se joint powers are Jointly and severally bound to ronderoiie and the same account, unless the testator lias divided their functions, and each of them has lieni wl hin tlie scope assigned to him. They are responsible only, each lor his share, for the property for which tiiev to.ik pos-e^siui. .11 tlicir joint cai.a.;U>, and for I' e ouv- ment ot the balance due, saving the distinct liability bf Bucli as are authorized to act separately. :s. 324 325 EXPERTS. tliPir office four 'tafor (or I lie ml- KciiHoiis iillejieii the (li'tcnilanla, 'f two of tliciii, atio!>— //t7(/, ili.M- ice would n'f|iiire iestitiitiiiii of the few iMoiilliH after ' admiiiiMiraiiiiii. L. N. iH.'i, S. C. a (estanieiitary in perfect fjooil omission (if II II- ihiuiUk Citizi-Hn 24L. 0. J. 21)3, t ing one of the V. D., sen., sued ry executors of an account and 3 in their liands. al value of the $44,525.05. Of • said capacity, dered hy tlieiii, The balance, jokfl of W. D. of \V. D.,sen., jrs, and t ^Lave n of the other irt. 913 ot the itly and sever- ouiit tliev took Jity, and tliere- re.sponsilile tor Darlinij it C. J. 125, Su. ntary executors, ■ have all t'((uiil ttie testator lias any of them be y Iieiform alone ;r8 requirinj; lii.s- 3iierally aa atior- n of tlio tesitator he responsibility executors cannot le will to othiTs e rcpre entcit by itors e.xercising erally bound to 1 tlie testator li,i.s them lias kopt I art resnonsiblB y for which they liiid loi' t' e pay- tlnct liability of i.lj. But testamentary executors cannot be lexiilly charged with more than six per cent, interest on the inoney-< collected hv them alter tlieiraccount has been demanded, m' the ali.-onee ol proof that they realized a greater rate of interest by tjie use of such moiievs. ]h. 2:!f.. Hut an action tor the moilevs thev have received, or ought to have received, in such capacity, cannot be prescribed otherwise than bv the long prescription of thirty years. Ih. VIII. RlOHTS OF. 2.37. A testamentary executor, for the pur- po.se of the e.xeoution of tin will, is seized of the moveable property of the succession, and may claim pos.se.-sion of it against the lecatee. Archamhwtlt & Citizens Inmimnce Co , tTl N 41«, ,t 24 L. C. J. 2y,J, 8. C. 1H80. 23S. And a lite assurance policy i.s a moveable, and as such is payable to the testamentary executor and not to the legatee, lb. EXPHOPIIIATIOX. IV. Rkpoht of. 326 EXEMPTIONS. I. Fhom ExECLTTioN, .9ce EXKCUTIOX. STlTUTIONs'''"'"'''' ■"" '^'^^^^'^'^^'^ ^^■ EXHIBITS -See PEOCEDURE. I. In Election- Casks, seeELECTION LAW. EXPAETE PEOCEDUEE— 5fee PEG- GED UEE. EXPENSES. I. LiKN- OF Lkoatkk for, sec LEGACY. II. LiK.V OF I'l.KnoKK FOR, .sw IMiRDGE. in. Of Ei.iiCTioxs, see ELECTION LAW. EXPEETS. I. Effect of Rkferekce to. II. Kviiience of, xot received in Maritime Casi.;s, h,'o, MAl'JTIME LAW. III. Powers of. IV. Report of. I. Effect op Rkferexce to. 2'i:). A report vf experts, unlike rn award of arhitrators, does iiut, by iMchidi'," iie whole 'jiit'^tioii ill dispute, exclude oM- i evidence .*"« k I\njeHe, 2 L. N. 335, Q. L'. ;»?!). III. Pow :;rs of. 240. Experts when thev have made their re- port are/uoe// f#c/V), and cannot of their own motion make a new repoii on ■_• ground that the hrst ts iniperfect. Beckhai, v. Farmer, 21 L.C.J. 38, 8. C. 1877. C' 211. IMny to fitr.—TUo delay for fllin.' a re- lortol experts is not governed bv Art. 337 C. ^. P., as a report of experts aiel a report of arbitrators are not the same Ihing. C/niiitrloui, iv Dominion Oil Cloth (Jo., 2 L N. 311, .S. C. 212. A report of experts duction of evidence i:eneral V. Payette, 24 L. C is no bar to the ad- V III the case. Scult L lll,y. B. 1871). EXPEETISE. I. May HE Dispensed with ix Actiox op Partitio.v, see PARTITION. ^'' •^'•^V,l';; , and ,1() Vic. cup. 5(), hpc. 12/ in flio Miime tiiiic iliut tlicy (li'tcriiiiiu' the am ■ intoi ip.i ■ |.. iiity Cur expropriated Inn. I, asMe", and appropri- ate tliut indeinnitv npim tlie dufcit-nt person-i beneliled liy the inipnivenient- . Such a.HsesH- inent mid apportionment cam,. >t he made atlcr the report of tlie coniiiii>^ioiierH lia» been homolo;,'aled, and they ha\ r hvcotw fuiir/i officio. Miiiii't; etc., of Montreal &. Stephens, 3 L. R. 605, P. C. 1878. V. Pktition.s for. 247. IVtitioiiB for expropriation under the Railway Act of HC'i uiiiNt contain tlie de^criii- tiun required hy Arf 21(;7 C. Ct f.'owwL , atoiier.t i,f Q. M. O. .i O. liailieiiy & O'uVeiL 4 , Q. L. a. 216, 8. C. 1S7U. VI. PRiNoipi.K.f OF Valuation of Land in Ca.sks of. 248. Bespondentf and one M. having been appointed coiiimiH.-ioners in expropriation under Q. 27-^8 Vic. caiD. 60, made their valu- ation of certain land which hail been expropri- ated. Oil petition to the Superior Court by certain coiiirilmtorieM and the appellants the re.spondeiit.'< were removed fniin oHice. on the ground that they had in their valnalioji adopted a principle \vhich was ko palpalilv erroneous that Its udopti(,'i amounted to a want of dili- gence, which jii-fiHed the coun in ordering' their removal— y/(;/(Z, on appeal to I'livv Conn" cil, that it was not a pal|iablv erroneous prin- ciple in valuing land under tfie above niention- eil Act to take into consideration ita prospective • 'I'liB 22iid and 2oth sections of the Act 27 and 28 A ic. oil .. 6(), are heieby roppaled ; and it is (Miiu'liul tliat the said comniissioiipn) at the same time that they du- terniliic and (ix upon tilt) amount of tlio price iinlcmnitv or compen-^'atioii lor taeh and every iho pic •■- ni/. celaof ground requirol by the conioratfon , i.'said city (Montreal) for purposes of improv('inpiil ud commissioners shall have the exclusive power or privi- leKeto determine wliat pieces ofland or real estate shall have been or may be boiielited, and to what relative or comparative a uioniit, and the said coramis.sioners shall for tlie purposes of the said improvement, base their valuation upon the actual value of the said pieces or paicelsof land or ival estate irrespective of buildings th T'oii erected, takiiij? into account the size of the said pieces or parcels of ground or real estate and the bene- flt to be derived iioni the sa'd improvement; ami two of the said commlss i,ners shall have (nil power to act for the purposes of tliu suifi special assessment in case of a diveiMty <>♦•■ iidon, and their d. oision shall have the sanii' force I'l,.! ;;iltict as if tlie three commissioners liad concurred tl.erein. capabilities, nor din's the adoption of such a I principle justify a Hnding of want of diligence ■ '"'"'■ T'- !■'..' T; '•* "'■ "'''•' '^'■'•* ^f'"/oi\etc., j >> iifreal ii linm-n cl ah, 2 L. U. Itix, P. C EX PULS rOX— .Sc« E.TEOTMEXT LESSOR AND LESSEE. .x«!'.L UCTIONr" ''''"'" '"""'"'■"•'•• EXTRADITION. I. PowKii oF.ffndK IN Casks of. If. liEyl'IKKMKNTS OF AUT. HI. VVaHKA.VT (IF Co.MMITMENT. I. Power of Judge in Ca8E8 of. t Such jiliui must be accompanied by a copy of book of reference in wliich are set forth : 1. A general description of each lot of laud shewn upon the plan; 2. I'he name of the owner of each lot bo far as it can be ascertained; 3. All remarks necessary to the right understanding of the plan. Kach lot of land shewn upon the pl.aii is designati'd thereon by a number which i^nne fif » fiingle series, avd is entered in tlie bojk of rolerence to desig- nate the ianie let. 2107 tJ. C. " 249. On a petition for Inihcna corpus, bv one who had been coiiiiiiitted tor extradition— 7A'A/, that the jii.lge is required to decide wlietlier he deoms tlie evidence adduced before him siuli- cient to jir Jfy the apprehension and conim •- men. liirtrialof the person accused, if thee.;, u- had been committed in Canada. If he linds m the alHrinalive he should so state it in hi.s com- mitmeiit, and certify the tact to the proper executive authority. His functions do not e.x- tend to deterininiiij' whether the accused shouiii be extradited, as that rests with the Governor General alter the evidence has been reported to iiiin, bntil the judge tails to state in the com- iiiitiiK nt that he deems the evidence siitHcient t' e coiiiniitinent will be defective and iiiMitli- cient. Zink .xp., 6 Q. L. R. 260, Q. B. 1880. II. Rfitil itEMENTS OF ?.0T. 250. On a petition for habeas corpus, by a person committed for extradition to tlie IJnited States -/A-/./, that th. Kxtradition Act merely requires that the fugitive be •; arged wtili hav- ing coinmitte 1, ^vithin the tb.eign jurisdiction, one of the crimes enumeiated in the treatv, uiirt that the evidence of criminalitv be such a- according to t'l' ..ws of this country woui 1 justify bis appiionsion and trial if the crime had b; Qoiiiniitted here, and when the author- ities ;e eoiiiitry where the offence was comn: hi declared by the issue of a warra' ;or t ippieliension of an offender that tl .lets coK.jilained of constitute an ex- tradition oiieiice, according to their la> it only • If one or more of said commissioners at any tiim alter their appointment shall fail in tlie duo perform- aiiceoE the duties assigned in and by the present Act.or shall not fulhl tlie saiii duties in a faithful, dilleeiil and impartial manner, it shall be lawful for the corporation ot the s.aid city (Montreal), by ita attorney, to apply bv sumniiiry petition to tlie said Superior (Jourt, or to ii judge thereof tis tlie case may bo, to stay the proi-eedings ot the said commissioners, and to remove and replace the conimiKSioncr or conimissionei-s wlio may have forfeited or vn.i;ttcd his or their obllgalioii.i; and upon such peii- lion the said court or judge may issue such orders as may be deemed conformablu to justice. 329 EXTRADITION. wliHlKM ll,e,sa.ne uotH il oui„initti.,| liorc woul,! r .„'J' 'l'"',' ''":;J"'-"'y "'<■ '"•ri'^t HiHi ti-iul ot tin. 1 ^^^L ^7.'' "/"•'•'■'"""•y il>iiitl.eil..p.,HitionH I tuk.-n l„.|„re the inaj^iNirme who issued tlie original wiuriiiit. Ih. 252 All.] .Ill error in tl.o warrant of arrest in an oxtnulitinii case ,1,,,.. i,.h alD'ct tiie wairan w .r'T'"';''"' "' "T '!""■'• '"■ '" ""'Ionian.',' with the chuige anil the uvi.iniof u.Jiliiceil. W.'i. Aii.i the cxpre-^HiunK "ibrL'ery" hii,I or,7e'ur"'l'"r'' '''''•"" '" '''"■"-'■■'Ml. 01 iieatv ii,ohi,le every crime llilli,,,, „, , tliat .,i-'ei.t does not on its face Hhow (hat the cas,. of the a(.rn-ed li »v.l..nlhe,ern.sof,he,.xtraduion t a,! aii tlie slalules authoriziiiL' the tJroceed.La extradition, or fails to co'^.tain th'. . ".I^.t uiy co,„;ln,„„„, ,.,, .uiHoient eaule 'o d e e ' I"" wil have been shown, and he will L lilx-rated on /,a^YM ,.,<)v,«.y lb 2o8 On up,.,, Hon lor /,nh,us cur,m.^^mi H'at III a demand ol exirailition lor for -erv ih! 11","™:;;."'"/!;."""' "■"' ■■""" p'- 1'"...'. . 2m. TliHi H wHiTiuit Of tlic Govfriior (J,.,.,.™! » «ol n(K»...r,, i„ .„,l,„„,„ „.e .,iZ 11 couris), t.. issue liis warrant t.ir the nniirelioiiH ,,,,,, f ui utiivur t( le oovuruor a copy of all tUe EXTIiAIT DE BAPTEMK EXTEAIT MOETUAIIiE-^.. CFR TIFIUATEOFBLRIAL. EXTRAS. I. Evidence ok, see UUILDRKS EXTRA REMUiNERATlON. VANT.'"" ™' *'' MASTER AND StiR. testimony taken befciro him flint „ ijpon tl... requisitlou of theTi i ed Sfr"?"',:""'' '"■•"'e der of such per.s„„ pursuant t!,,! f,!,?, '^ '"^ ""■■ """■«,,- with Which there i' a /reaf^ ,r T,^ ''^'.•""i« 'fates offeu..3, oto., to Which thoAoUnppllca)"'ia." """ '"« i ■I ■|.ii .' if u p. SUMMARY OF TITLES. Paiii: KAniaquKS xu FACTUK 3:ti FACTUM IN Al'PKAL ., ;i;u FAITS FT AHTICl.KS x\l FAI-SK AHItKSr ;j;)i FAI,SH ]in)l)l\(} 3Mi FALSH IMPRISONMENT ;i;il FA LSF PRFTENCKS :m FALSE KETIUNS x\2 FA LSF STATKMP:NT8 ;;;i2 FAMILY COUNCIL -.m FATllEll ;t;i2 PEAK :m FEES I!.).! FELONY ;);!5 FENCES 'Wo FEUDAL RIGHTS .Ti:, FIDUCIARY LEGATEE ;).!:, FIERI FACIAS 3;)5 FILIATION 33(; FIN DE NON RECEVOIR [m FINES 3;iG FIRE 3,(0 FIRE INSURANCE 3;!t; FIRM 3:iti FISH 3;t(; Paoe FIXTURES (3(1 "'"» '.'.'.' ^ '.'.'.'. m FOLLE ENCII f-.R E 3% FOOTPATHS " ' 3.jg EORCE MA.IEIRE Jj'ig FORECLOSURE .'.'['.."," 337 FOREKJ N ASSIG NM ENT. .... ,* ." ",",'. .',, , 337 FOREIGN ENLISTMENT ACT ' (17 FOREIGNERS .'.".' 337 FOREKJN JUDGMENT ...".'.*."." 33h I'OREKiN MARRIAGE .'"" 338 FORFEITURE 3),^ FORGED DOCUMENTS '.".', 'm FORGED DRAFTS ','i'J FORGERY l^ijy t'ORM ;;.".;;; ;;,;, FO RM A LITI ES 3.')^ FORTUITOUS EVENT '..."'.' 339 FORWARDER ' " " 3'jy FRANC ET QUITTE "." 33., FRANCHISE ■■■ V)9 l''«AUD \.. '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' 340 FRAUDULENT CONVERSION,... 310 FRAUDULENT TRANSFER 340 I'REIGHT ■" 3,0 ••""^ST ■.■.■;.';.■.■.■ .340 rABllIQUES-''xt'^^'' ^°" y^J^OKS Dua Minor Son, see ACTION. Paoe .136 336 5 33fi :m 336 337 337 CT 337 337 33M 338 338 338 33!) 331) 331) 339 339 339 339 339 340 )N.. 340 340 340 340 CES, ee CRIMINAL N"S. lee CRIMINAL ■NTS. ee CRIMINAL :iL. [IP. js Minor Son, 888 FEE3. fj:ak. CAI'SKn HY, WIM, Sl-PI'I.RT AN FOB MANHI.AlMiMTEK, net CRI- FEES. 334 I. Dkath Ixilll'TMKNT . Ml.NAI. LAW FKKS. I. Fob MnAKiRiNd Timber. fl. Of Aiitocatks. Jfl. {)¥ AlTDIlNKYa. I\'. Ok H.uMKKt*. V. Ok OiAiiDMN. VI. Ok Hkih Conhtaiilks. VII. Ok Slrvkvohs. I. FoK Mkasi'ki.vo TiMUKii. I. A suit Cur let'H for tlip measiirini; oCiiiMhcr li.y llOfiHcl culltTH, in:t\uii iiri,|( r llic'snpi.rviHor ol ciill.TH at Qiiclin., piirHimnI lo C. S V can 4t., iH |,i„,„.|lv lin.u^'lit ill tl„. „„„„. of tliP ^Jr'^"' ,, rj;''""""* "■ i'renderyaxt, 4 C^. L. R. ioj, a. Vj. io7o. II. Of Advocates. 2. Plainti/r liaviiifr (Icniaiidpil pavrnont of lii- aecdtiiit froiiKli.H.M.Iaiil willioiii ulcVt finiilovfil the MTViccH ot uii ailvocate, win, wn,i.. hjiu'ili,. onliiiarv letter and a.Ideil $1.3.') tlierelWr. The delfiidant llien Kent to plaiiitiH' $0.23, the Imre amount (.f ilie duht, Init went nothing (of the attunu7',s letter. Plaiiitill'tlieii sued for *!|.35 calliiif,' It a halaiice due on the uccoiiiit alter de.jiictioii of tl,(. co.sts of the letter— 7M/, that the ulaintill' had a ri^lil to recover the ooHts of the letter, but that #1.00 wa.s a HulHcient .•han'e therelor. Heroux v. Clement, 10 R. L r>Hi) C. C. 1880 ; & Lii/ht/mll & Jackmn, 3 L. N. 37* \j. C 1879. 3. Ill an action by an nttorney aijainst his client lorprofet'Hional services a qwiiituiii iiuruit was allowed over and above the ta.xed bill DcHJmdiuH v.Biirime, 2 L. N. 270, .S. V. 1871). 4. Ill the Supreme Court advocates ari'iiiin' their own case are nut allowed fees. JmiZ/IoIs & !(////), 3 L. N. 336, ,Su. Ct. 1880. 5. During the pro^tiess of an action tiie client paid hiH altonieys $239.75 on account of costs Ihe ca.se was won and carrieii to appeal, where the judfiinent was conlirnied. The attornovs having been paid their costs by the losing parlV "'':' appellant brought action to recover Ins $239. Ihe attorneys iiad had an unusual amount of lalior in connection with the case and there was evidence that thev were to be paid some j^SO extra, which, in tact, they iiad received and given a receipt tor as in full. The action in the lirst instance was niainlained except as to the lifty dollars. In review this judgment was reversed, and the action was dis. missed altogether, and in appeal the judgment ol the lirst instance was restored, cost ofappoahs divided. Larue & Lorauaer, 2 L. N. 165 S. C. R., & 3 L. N. 284, Q. B. 1880. rec.ver hidjuNt fees and disbiirwrnents ngainst lil_- '■ '<7il. '!■ t .<• pi'oof an.l the cireuin.tanees •■'laldish that there has been u Hettlenienl out oln,un and that the litigati.,n is at an end. I'tH <"<. 1; ("■'.•'/"•'"■''y ••/(■/"■» q. L, H. 72, 1879. ' . '.». Where an attorney in Quebec receives ni.structions from an attorney in Ontario to take action, ami does so, he cannot come upon the client^ot Ins correspondent lor his fees and cos s, Keller & Jrahon, 2 L. N. 400, C. C. IV. Ok iiAii.iKKS. III. Of Atorxeys ad '.ites. 6. The formality of a judgment is not neces- sary to give the attorney ad litem a riglit to .10 A baihd not residing in the chef-lieu of hisdi.strict IS not entitled to charge for Iruv,! rom his residence to the Court house and back o the pla.te of service, the latter being between his residence and the Court house."/.,, U,/,, eMnrale ,1, /„ r,m,i,,e de Herthkr in re it. l{,iM„n, H n. L. 748, S, C. 1878. 11. Lnless there is agreement to that elFect, or the attorney has received the monev froiii ns client, he is not liable personallv "to the I'ailitl (or his lees for services, (/diniin v JM„,,onl, 10 |{. L. 229, C C. 18,80. 12. Aittion against an altornev for balance of an account lor bailiirs (ees for scVvices. Deien,!- aril plead.Ml a special agreement that plaintill shoul.l have no right to look to defendant until and nil ess delendant himself had received the lees; that delendant ha,l fullv riaid all that plaintitl was entitled to receive lor the sai.l ser- vices. Concerning the alleged a.'reement the plaintitl denied that he agreed to il, but admit- ted that in practice he observed it in order to obtain the .felendanfs practice. The joint pro- thonotary ,,roved that according to the rer ,rds in hiscusto,ly the plaintilf perlormed these, vices mentioned in certain schedules, amount, ing, according to the tarilf, to somewhat more than the amount lor which credit was .'iven — JJ'l.f, that the proof thus adduced wasinsuth- oent. hat a^lmitting that an attorney is per- .T; ''"'''V']^"'^'^■''«'^''"'<' latterfit.oes ;-t therelore (ollow that a bailitf who has r,er- (>irmed services in a ca.sc can hold the attornev "I record, merely as such, liable (br the haiUti'a ees without proof of any kin.l that the bailifl h a. been employed by the attornev. T/teruux V. I'ncaud, 6 Q. L. R. 14, S. C. R. 1879 V. Of Guardian. 13 Action by a guardian for fees. The ac- tion .as directed aijainst both the baHoV ^.h.-^ appointed him and the plaintdf in the ca-e in which the appointment had been ma.le. The latter made deJault, but the bailiff contested on Pll i 4 335 FIERI FAf IAS ■H the grounil that lie was not Vmhh-HelJ, tliat tliere jvas no doubt of the liabiliiy of the bailitf towardH the guardian, and tliat his propel- recourse in such cane was by an action en gar- aniie aMinst those wlio liad employed him. £entard&Quemel,S. C. 1817. VI. Op High Constable. 14. By order in council of the Quebec Gov- ernment costs of sumnioninf,' wilnesse.s.and their taxation and other expenses attending the pre- liminary investigation of criminal otlences, in- cluding constable's teen, are chargeable to the party prosecuting and not to the Crown incases wliere the prisoner is not committed or held to bad to stanc his trial. The defendant hav- ing ob ained the services of plaintiff as hi.rh constable in connection with an informalion ?or a misdemeanor specially undertook to pay plain- tltl s tees therefor "according tothe Governinent regulations now existing," it aiipearing thjit the prisoner had been sent for (rial-^//eW, that the deleiidant, could not be made liable for the fees due the plaintiff' on account of the ser- vices 80 rendered by h i „, . Ga nioux & Bell, 4 Q. L. R. 2(14, S. C. R. 1877. VII. Of Surveyor. 15. A surveyor filed his report with a pro- hibition endorsed thereon to its being opened until his fee was paid-7/eW, that although he was entitled to protection under Ait. AU C. C. f., that the report nuist nevertheless be opened and the bill taxed, but no use to be made of o,"'i'H.Pfl'i^ ^'^'^'^'y ^ Poirier, 21 J.. C.J. ii, b. 0, 1676. FORCE 3IAJEURE. FILIATION. 336 ..v^'n^'' ^'''•'^«"'>»-iTE Children-, «e« ACTION E.\ Declaration de Patermte. -"^^^"^^ FIN DE NON RECEVOIR— See PLEADING. FINES— 6'ec PENALTIES. FIRE. . JcIilJSr" '^'^^^"'^'^""^ »" Crops nv, FIRE INSURANCE-See INSUR- ANCE. FELONY— See CRIMINAL LAW. FENCES— Sec CONTRACTS, Inter- PUETATION OF. x>}ee INSUE- iRSHIP. JTION LAW. 'TY, Desorip- ) FOR Vessels IE. ICIAL. GE.s, MUNI- IE. Iv ACCIDEMS. :eH f;!'fiasionet{ iiig beei) run iu turn liaJ 337 FOREIGNERS. been frigliteno.l t,v afall of .now from a church root Ihe iJeferiiiaiiis wcir tnisices of (his chitrcl), and prove.l that tht-i-p h.id b(\n a heavy snow -jloim just proviouM to a.).l up to ten o clock of the nioriiinsr of the day on which the accident occurred They proved further tiiat the Corporatior :-u es forbid tlie removal of snow after J a.m.— //«/,/, m review and appeal (re- versinji the judgment of the Superior Court, 2 h. W..^41) not.o be /WW mujciire, mM $150 damage, and costs allowed. Trestl,'r& Dawson, 3 L. N. 76, S. C. R., & 5 L. N. 114, (J. B. 1881 FORECLOSURE— &.e PROOEDUEE. FOREIGN ASSIGNMENT. I. Has so Epfkct to Tkansfki! Lmmovkablk Property iNCAKAnA, see INSOLVENCY. 17. A bankrupt assignment made under the provisions of :in Act of Cnu'ress of the United States of America will not transfer imniove- al>ie property in Canada. MavdmiaM & 0,:.,: FOREIGN ENLISTMENT ACT. I. Arrest "ndkr. 18. Upon fhc rep-esentations of the Consul beneral (ifSpam for Canada an American ves. sel was d-faiiip.l, unloaded and .'*ean;he.| by vjr tueof a V un-aut under (he hand ..I'the Governor t -neral of Canada, upon a charge of iiavinc on bobrd ani^sand niiinitionsof war destined for the use o'"1;:j' ;u) insurgents, confrai-y to the provi- "'O'y ^1 »■"•? " Foreign Enlistment Act, 1-74 " ~lmd, that tiie chanjes iiguinst the ve.s.sel were not .supported bv facts to iustif\- her deter tion, and that hearsay evidence" could M..t le received under such circumstaiKX'. The "Atalaya," G Q. L. ii. 174, V. A. C. Isso. 19. //«'M, also, that an indemnKy to the owner was payable liy the commiHsione'rs of the Im Tt' //''''"'""''^ U"Jer (he provisions of the FOREIGNERS. I. Capias aoain.st. n. Capia3 hv. III. Sdmmon.s of. I. Capias against. is ^mViI^'p'''*' "'"' ""^"*' ''f-";i"°ti person who 'H 111 this Province temporaril.-. and is „!„..,( m reuini home, if no otlier groiimi.^ ,\' fraud are FORGED DOCUMENTS. ' 388 II. Capias by. vil no( le, both pardes bcmtr only temporarily 'n this Province, aii.l the ailegej del/arising out of a contract entered into in a foiri.rn connfr.y, where the allegation in the atlidarit upon which fne capias i.ssned alleges the im- mediate dcpartur,. of detendant with intent to - 1- .N . l.S.S, A 2.i L. C. J. 2(i7, S. C. 187'J. III. Sl'MMONS OF. 22. The plaintirt' in Montreal purchase.l a cargo of oysters from a dealer fromWew Hruiis- wick, paying liim therefor partly by cash and |.a lly by a hon The oy.sfers 'haCini: turned out worthless plaintiff notified the ,«eller and re.;eivmg no satisfaction, brought action for ((.images. Defendant having no domicile here, plan, itt made affidavit a.sto the /;o,,, ami called him inhy advertisement under Art. (18 L. I.. 1 . Ju.lgment was taken bv defkult and 'le endant appealed. //,/-/, that while a hon or u<.te was i,roperty within the meaning of ,Sfee CRIMINAL LAW. I. Meaning of Term in Extradition II. Pleading in Action on Note. Treaty^'^'*'''*' of Term in Extradition 2G. Tiie expressions /o^5fe,7/ and ufbranre of jm-ged paper a.n used in the extra(Jition tivu.v ii'i- cliKle every crime lallinguiider that descriphun, whether it amounts to a telonv oris o,ilv a niisdemeanor. Worms exp., 22' L. C J. fou FORM. I. Of Donation, see DONATION. formalitip:s. I. In Sale of Land, see SALE, Jcdicial. FORTUITOUS EVENT— ;See FORC' MAJEURE. I. What is, see PAWNBROKERS, Liaui- LITV OF. ' "'*"' FORWARDER— ^ee CARRIERS. FRANC ET QUITTE-See SALE WARRANTY. FRANCHISE. 1. Use OF, see STREET RAILWAY. I. Cannot de Pleaded uy the Party Gdii ty ii.UooDsPim(;HASEUiN,see insolvency' iU. Receipt set aside a.s made hy. JobNATION"' "' ''"'"""'' ^""'^''""^ '^^•' I. Cannot be Pleaded by the Party Guilty. . 27. Action to set aside two deeds of sale of an imnioveal) e property. The declaration of tlie plaintitt alleged thai lie, plaintitt,in November, 181)1, bemg insolvent, and having nothin- left but the imnujveable iii (juestion, transferral (,v deed of sale to his brother-in-law, a person of no mean.s, in order to nave it from his creditors, and with He understanding that as soon as plaintilf should be relieved from his embarrassments ti.e property should be re-transferred to liim J- 16 respondent, who was aware of all this, an,! who ha,l ajudgnient against the plaintiff and a mortgage on the properly in question, took an execution against it, which was opposed bv the holder, and afterwards took » deed of .-ale o"t the property from the holder for a uoniinal sum. ilie action in question was then taken to annul both transfers on ilie ground of fraud and simulaiion-i/eW, that no one can alle.re hi« own traud to avoid his own deed. Gareau & (xureaii, 24 L. C. J. 248, Q. B. 1877. III. Receipt set aside as made by. 28. Action by an assignee in insolvency for a sum of money due insolvent under a deed of ■■ale. Flea of payment and receipt tiled. An- «u'er, that the receipt was simulated and frau- dulent. Proof, that payment was only by a promissory note which had been transferred to defendant's mi\--Held, setting aside the receipt. Melaugon v. Bessener, 2 L. N. 280, S. C. 1879. FRAUDULENT CONVERSION. I. Evidence OF, see CRIMINAL LAW. FRAUDULENT TRANSFER. I. By Insolvent, see INSOLVENCY PER ^''^''"'"'^' "*" TRAN.SFEREE, ste TKANS- in. What is, see SECRETION. FREIGHT. I. Liability for, see AFFREIGHTMENT. II. Lien for, .see CARRIERS. FJiOST. I. LUBILITY OP BuiLDIiiBS FOR. 29. A builder is liable fordamagescccasioncd to his work hy fro.t, if he agreed to execute tlie work at a sea.son whei. it was liable i,, j,,- ij. JN. bD, S. C. R, 1877. 340 HE Party Guilty. •eJNSULVENCY. «AI)E HY. ION Pkoccred by. IE Party GuiCTY. Jeeds of sale of an eclaratiori of tlie titt.in November, iviiig notliing left Jn, transferred ty iw, a person ol ud hiscmlitorn, and f f-otin UH plaintill eniliiirruHsnients vnslei'red to him. •e of all tUiH, and le plaintitfand a lue.- the good-will was as follows : " The said Thomas McWilliam shall retire I'roni the .said tirin, and the said Jonp'han Fiiidlav shall pav him for his good will therein, and lor the'unc.xpireil term of the lease of the premises in wliieh the said business is carried on, the sum of SI, 000." The appellant charged the respondent with h.aving violaie.1 his agnei lent, I'v starting in the same line of biisines,- '".i the saiiie street,")!^ shop being No. 514 and the other No. .■)40 St. Paul St., Montreal, and entering into competi- tion with him by sending lirciiTars to the cus- tomers of the late tiri,,, and in other ways creating the impression that ho had succeeded to the business of the firm— /Wrf, that a ,«ale by a retiring partner to his co-partner of the good-will of the business implies an obligation on the part of the retiring partner to abstain from undue competition with the purchaser of the good-will, and that under the circunntancea he must be held to have violated the obligations imposed upon him bv the sale of such Good- will. Fmdlay& McWiUUim, 23 L. C. J. 148, Q. B. 1875. GOVEENMENT. I. Power OF WITH Respect to Pliimc Works. see IN.J UNCTION. IL Wages of Persons Empioved bv, at ?n°rJ*!i.'F"./ ''^^- ^'°'' «K'ZAiii,E, see EXECU- TION, Exemptions. i 343 GUARDIAN. GRAND JUEY. I-AW^"*"""'^" ^"■'' "•"''^ ^°' *^« CRIMINAL GUARDIAN. HI. Liability fob Fees of. 344 GliEAT SEAL-^ee SEALS. GROSSES REPARATIONS. ANDLES«;JL"' ^''''°" '"'''^'■'^ '^J^^SOIi GUARANTEE. L Acceptance of, see SURETYSHIP, GUARDIAN, I. JL DlSrHAIlGK OF. I.Mi'HISOX.MKNT OF. UJ. LiAnn.iTY FOR Fee.s of. J V . LlAHlI.ITV OF. y. LlAHlI.ITV OF Defendant as. \ . A1IXOH.MAV UE A GlAHDIAN. V I; H^'"'^' ^""' Ph^o'ks-Verkau y 111. RioiiTS OP. T. DiSCHASGE OP. vnt ^J'^'f}^''"'' i^.;»ardian "8ei.ed ,r' nioveabies, pod« and effects _ seizcl 11, thi« ca,i,.e, and placed in his care and keepiiijr, and described in the .said .-chednle ««o'do!:'?r"T''*'''r"^ "■*• ■" ^)<''«"it<'f i'i« ••cane Ir. .'i '""^'"'"'^ P<^>- '^"rps an.l in- " ^o,L «■'"'* pro-'"'''''^ the CMirt: There in no doubt of the riah of action un,ler the old law , and our Code Sr°v 'I ";ing the Ktatute only srive.s a privilege to the Hl.ent, or the bailiff to' demand Jay, e^t n ad vanc^.fro,n,in,,.to,,,ne,witho,Ltanin;er.S n^' with the {Tuardian'.s rijrht to -et nayment ^tvf ."•.'"''''■"'''?''■ '"■'-•"■•'li'i'.' to the author it.vofPothier, the bailiff, if he is called o. to P.i'-t, flat employed him. The .lelendant O ".ake.s.lefa.ilt. The bailiff is e^a., ine 'and ;;ayH It was Q. and not he, who ap,x nted it guar. Iian,but he admits he signe. 'X" « U^, 'wW which is sufficient to charge hiVi I ...ust give judgment (or the amount taxed by nil a.sks lor «8 50 be.sides for expenses in en- deayonng to get paid , but there iVno proof'of . Hs. Judgment (or $124.50 and cos?m "'^[ue es on, service of process might have been given sc.i8"7."°'P''"^''^ '■"'■• ^'^""'•'^ y-QMl IV. Liability of. 7 A ju.jicial guardian refusing or ne^Iectin.^ to deliver the effects seized to the bailiff; clmr 5 With a writ of ve^tditioni exponas, is not Im1, to contramte par corps untfl after a judJnte t ordering him to deliver up the thingsC^bee, &7?L.i?%tc.c^Tr-^-^-«^"- n, ^" "^K." ^^'i' '^!''^' "^"' "'« plaintiff seized the moveables of the delfendant, and na.ne.l A. L yoluuary guardian. Alter various proceed in"» ha.1 been 1,8,1, the effects seizwl were advert sed or .sale (he 7th J.ine, 1879. The guaXn m^ '^'n,g able ,o (ind them, they er^e not 'rt coming at thesal,.,ai.d thephl.ntitf present, a petition lor a coiitrainte par corps-IfrM that the guardian was discharged b^MhelaZo a gLSV=?n";^C^Sclr/^;te S St Onee,"then in the han.ls of one M. 13 A lu.bcial guardian was at first appointed but «/t*rwards the plaintiffs (now respondents! 1 con.sented that M. B. should continue'ung ,3 ilf A"."'."" -^^PP,^'^'"-" filed by h.n, "o^ le sale of the barge should be deci.fed. To th s I ^'xi the parties entered info a notarial a-rree ! tnet.f, an. the appellants l^can.e parties to tJit i agreemi-nf, «« suretie.s. taking the'plaoeof't le ud Cttl guaM.an .*ho was tLreupon libera e. J^on his charge the opf^.sition was dismissed and M B was therea,K)ii calle,! upon to deliver the barge to be sold by (he bail'ifl, but in the nieanlnne other oppositions had been filed accompanied with an or.ler of the judge ,7 to proceH, e.n,i M. R. refused to .ieli^r f.p t'l/o - -. .. J-!.,...- Hie prc.-trit acti..ii aott.n.si tiip sureties or voluntary gnnrdhn,^ HcldX H'e 345 GUARDIAN. CO rt of f5r.st instance, that tl>e stirotics had not. „. to .10 with the .nl.emie.it opposition., b.mI that the opposition or M, 6., their principal ing been dismissed, they were bom„t to GUARDIAN. 346 II living ,i„ii,. " . V ""'") ""V were uouiid to u «7. P ! ^""■*^'' according to tlie terms of the a^-reenient or hay the amount due ; but this jiid-nient reversed m appeal, on the ground that Ihe opposition still pen.'llnu, stopped all proceed Q.^R im!"^"'^ BourbauU, 10 K, L. 3;U, nf l^? ''!fP''T."'"" '"''^ l*^*"" nan'e is an authentic document, ami as It did not appear by the proci,-oerbal that the appellant had signed or had declared his inabi- lity to do so, that the rule should liave been 245 q' B 188?'"" ^ ^Varc/»7do,<, 10 R. L V. Liability of Defendant as. 11. A defendant who becomes voluntary guardian of etiects seized under a writ It execution is liable as such to co,,trav,fe par I'm: '^ * ^'''""'' ^ ^- N- 413, s^c' VI. Minor mav iie Guardian. 12. A defendant filed an opposition to a eei.ure and Hale of his things, on the ground that the guardian appointed was a minor- Meia, dismissing the opposition. bikI that wiiere the guardian is u voluntary guanlian, and tlie tilings seized liavo remaine.l in the imsses- Hion of the defendant, that the seizure is not atfected by the minority of the guardian, not- withstanding he be not subject to a.utrainte mV"''^"' ^ ^^ ^' '''""'^' ^ Q- ^- ^^- 5' c. C. Vir. Must sign Proce.s-Veuhal. 13. On the contestation of a rule iiini against a voluntary guardian t.. things seized— 7ieW, "a lie consent of the jiersdn sought to be Held to tieconie guardian must appear by his signature or its equivalent on ih^ ,1-orP.s-verhal, and my so appe.aring the rule was dis.diarged 1880 " ^"'-'■■''M'"'- 10 11. L. 2An, Q. B. Vni. RiGHT.S OF. ,li «• .^"^'''''■'*,'. T'"^ '"*** '"^' possession of he efiects placed in liis care mav reclaim them by a«,7«e,we/,2 352 352 3.')2 '«iAM8 352 Page 347 HOMOLOGATION 353 HORSES 352 HOTELKEEPERS 353 HOURS 353 UOUSEtiOLU EXPENSES 354 I'Ol'SES 354 HUSBAND AND WIFE... 354 HYPOTHEC _'_ 354 m 347 HABEAS CORPUS. HABEAS CORPUS. I. OnorxDs of. II. I\ Civil, Mattkrs. III. J'OWKII OF COUIIT TO E.XA.MINK EVIDENCE IN Casks op. ly. Hkvii.;w Fiio.M Judgment on. y. When Lies. VI. When Petitioxekis at Large. I. Grounds of. 1. Petitioner was a (lefendant in a ca.se in tlip Superior Court in w)n«h ju.l-UR.nt l,a,i been rcn,i.re.l agH,„,, 1,,,., an,! wa,. iniprisone.l under Art. (HI of tiie Cotle of P.-oce,ii,re for resistin.' execiiti.m against lier -ou,l,s. Her release was aske.! , ,y on the ground that the ju.Lnnent mis bM-Hrll, that the jiuignient ooi.l.l only he reviewed or revised in app.'ai or revision, and that .It. .s8 tliere was clear evidence of excess 0\ .)nri>,i:ction hahi-ax mrpus would not lie. i>iiu se(.u or had made option of imprisonment- //''/'/, granting the petition, that tlie warrant shouM state that the prosecutor had made option o imprisonment, or that a ..arrant of distiess had i.s^.ied, and the accused did not po.ssess sufhcieni property to pay the fine and ccsts. Irep.inur exp., 10 R L. 191, S. C 1880 10. Prisoner was discharged on habeas corims, where It was snowii that in the conviction the presiding magistrate was described as nolioe magistrate, whereas be was onlv a justice of the sr:r^'^'Ss!^-c^i£^'^^'^^-*"^-^ II. In Civil, Matters. 11. Where a person imprisoned on a civil process applied Cora wri. of habeas corpus on the ground ol ininority, the application was re- tuse.|,as there was no notice to the partv inter- ested, and as tbealtilavit whichonlv contained a general relerence to tiie allegations of the petition was insutticient, inasmuch as it did not disclose any reasonable or probable ground for S q"b 1878"' '"'''■ ^"""'''«" '-^P-' ^ ^- N. 12. A person imprisoned under a process in a civil matter is not entitled to be discharo-ed on habeas corpus if no excess of jurisdiction is shown. Cutler exp., 22 L. C. J. 85, Q. B. 1877. i.i. And that the writ of execution under winch lie was arrested appears to be irregular. Heali/ exp., 22 L. C. J. 1H8, Q. B. 1878. . 14. But the petitioner may show that there 18 no judgment ordering his imprisonmeut, and in such case he i, entitled to his discharge. lb. 00. 15. And a judgment ordering imprisonment of a detendant until payment of debt, interest and I osts, ami also the costs of a rule, will not justily a commitment which includes ahso sheriffs costs, and the defendant under such circumstances is entitled to be discharged on /Mbeu-i corpus. Martin exp., 22 L. C. .L SS, Hi- But. in another case, in which there was a general cinidemiiation to cost.s iiy the words •the whole with cosis"-/((;/,/, that tliis would include the necessary future costs of executin.' O "ji"lS7T"'' ^'■''"'"■^•'""* ^f-> ^^ ^- t!. J. a^, 349 ^lABEAS CORPUS. irregu- ifti for Jaffrey 17. And wliere tlie court from nliicli the process issued is a Superior Court, liavinj; juris- diction over the suliject matter, tiiere is^a pre- sumption tliat its jurisdiction has U'en ri>'iit- fuliy exercised, niiri it is not necesNarv that'the cause of imprisonment he specilied in' tlie war- rant of commitment so as to shoiv that tiie court had jurisdiction. Ih. 18. Petition for, on several j,'ronnd8 c ' lantv, in case of a guardian impris I'uihire to produce -loods refused I' (^j)., 3 L. N. lOG, Q.' B. 1880. III. Power of Court to Examine Evidence IN Gas f, 19. On a petition for habeas corpus the judges have not tiie power t(j consider the proof made, for tlie purpose of iiheratmg tlie prisoner, ex- cept in cases of extradition. Narbuniiuexv., 10 R, L. 63, & 3 L. N. 11, Q. B. 1879. IV. Review fro.v Judcmknt on. 20. It is competent to a partv to inscribe in review Irom a judfiment reiid"ered on a writ ol/iaheas corpus. Jieyiiia v. Bull, n q. L.R. iou) b. C K. 187G. V, When Lies. 21. As a general rule where a minor is brought up before the court by /laheas corpus, if he he ot an age to exercise a choice, the court eaves him to elect as to the custody in which f Tull^'^- ^^^3i>M V. Hull, 3 Q. L. R. 136, S. C. 22. But.semfiZe, that this rule would not applv in the case of a girl under sixteen vears of a^'e leaving the liouse of her livther, mother or other person having lawful charge of her. lb. 23. Nor 111 the case of a refiaclorv child un- der fourteen years of age, liable to b^ sent to an industrial school under 32 Vic. cap. 17. Ih. 24. A habeas corpus will not be craiifwl where the petitioner is detained in a suit fbr a civii matter before a coun having jurisdiction Q "e'Tsn""""" ^''""'f'"" '^P' i J- N. 102. 25. And, in another case, hebl, that a writ of haheas corpus will not be granted to liberate a prisoner charged with process in a civil suit, even though the writ of execution in virtue of which he was arrested appear to be irregular, if It IS within the scope of the jurisdiction of the 103 Q Tl878 ' '' '''""^" ^^"''^y'^P' 1 ^- N- HEIRS. HANDWRITING. 350 itIvtV'!*"''*'"'^'*'* "f"' *■«« COMPARISON OF HANDWRITING. * HARBOR COMMISSIONERS. I. Injunction against, siinui.n bk in Name OF Attorney General, iccINJ L'NCTIONS. II. Powers of. III. QUORCM OF. II. Poweus of. 27 On a petition for certiorari— //eZi7, that tlie tlarbor tommissionors have authority un- der their bylaw.«, madr under 36 Vic. cap. ,'>4, sec. 18, 88. 6 and 7, to suspend the license of a pilot guilty of a dereliction of duiv. Lise cxv., 3 L. N. 338, S. C. 1880. ' ^ ' III. Quorum of. 23. The iietitioner complained that he had been illegally .sentenced to three months sus- pension from his functions as pilot bv a tri- bunal composed of three members of the Boanl of Harbor Commissioners for Montreal— //,/(? on certiorari, that a quuriim of five is required under 36 Vic. cap. 61, fur the trial of char.'es S^^n^^llPi'"'"' -««"<•'''''« & ^llun, 3 L. N. 142, o. L/. 1880. VI. When Petitioner is at Large. 26. The appellant imprisonetl under execu- tions for penalties for selling liquor without license applied undo,- Rev. StSts. 4 Series caj! . ,f ,^''^«'>a''Se- The order was made roturnabie before the Supreme Court of Nova &cotia,aiid the discharge was refused. Before instiiuting an appeal from the judgment the uppellant, whose time of imprisonment hud te appeal for want of jurisdiction-//eW, that an appeal will not lie in any case of proceedings ujy)n a wr.f .~i !>aljc,r! corpus, when at the time »l„I ^^i"?,.""" "PP*"",' "'" appellant is at large. t'-aser & lupper, 3 L. N. 394, Su. Ct. 1880. HEIRS— 5f(« SUCCESSIONS, WILLS I. Conte.station of Report ok Distribution' BY. II. LlAn".lTY OF. in. May iiRiNo Petitory Action for an Un- '"['•'Ku Share in an Im.movkahi.e. IV. May take up Instance in Action of Uamages for a Delit. V. Rights of, see SUCCESSION. I. Contestation of Report of Distribc tion bv. 29. Wliere a widow contested a report of distribution in her qualitv of universal lega'ee and testamentary executrix of her late husluiid, claiming a balance of a baillvur Je fonds, a property sold by him some years previous to his decease, and it was shown that she was in community with her husband, and would have been entitled to one-half of the amount due in hat capacity if ^he had so pleaded- Held, that her claim could only t,e maintained to the Tt xt" n."''"J"»i,*"- ^'"'"^ "■ Tremblay & lieid. 2 L. N. 196, S. C. 1879. 11. Liability of. 30. An action by a physician against the tutor to a minor, heir by will of his decea.sed mother, lor professional services rendered to the latter. Ihe tutor had accepted for the minor i,,^'*"'' *'."".. *'"' "'"*' "'' P^'Se & Ponton, p. 116 Art 3 arcs, ;! fs.-i-;;:"""' '• "» '« '-« -K .t I ■ I ; V 351 HEIRS. the pernonal property of tlie .lencased, biU lin,l renomiecl the oomtiiunitv wliidi exiv-toc) lieuvccn tho .lecciiscl imd her hii-haiHl. The Cl.m.i was rc-if^ted ,mi the trmmvl that the ,leht ielo.i!;e,| to the e.niniiMniitv which the minor had re.iounce,l_//,7,/, that althot.irh a deht of thec<.,„niiinitv, it was also a.iatiiraldeht of tlie child who liiid been eonstitiited heir. hrrnuH C. (f.'lH78'' ^ ^'- ^- •^"^' * '^- ^'- ^- •'■ ^l"' .SI. Property given to children which reverts to nn asceniiant under Art. (i.ifl of the Civil Code ,8 a .succession, and iiahie for tlie dehls of the decen.sed donee ; and snch property tnav be HM/.e,| l,y a (^•edit,)r in e.xeeution of a jud'- )Ment l..r a ,.eht of the .snecession withont lirst calling' upon tiie ascendant, who has acceiited the succession nnder benefit of inventorv, to III. Mav imixr, Pktitorv Action- for an UxDiviDKi) Shark of an I.mmoveaiii.e. 32. Petitory action rospectinc; a lot of land upon which valuable buildings had been erected 1 he plaintiff was the owner of an undivided eighth of the real estate in rpiestion arid the defendant, who had been in possession ol the whole of it up to the time of the institu- tion of the action, denie.l the right of the plain- titi to any part of it. The phiintitF thereupon brought petitory action. In review the defen- dant admitted the right of the plaintiff to an eighth, but argued that the right.sof the parties tieing undivided petitory action would not lie— Jfeld, tl.iit as the defendant ha.l denied the rig It of the plaintiff to anv part of it, and a.s her rights must be coextensive with her interest which mignt not be served bv a partition, that she was not conline.l to an a(^tion en partaqc. but that .she could bring action to establish I'ler midivided right, as she had dune. ArmUage v. Evaius, 4 Q. L. U. 300, S. C. U. 1878 f HORSES. HIGH CONSTABLE. 352 r. Fi;k.s Ol', see COSTS in Cki.mi.vai, Mat- HIGH SEAS. iSl\L ].AW, I.NDlCr.MK.ST. HIGHWAYS— St'c ROADS. HIRE—See LESSOR AND LESSEE MASTER AND SERVANT. I. Of Work and Labor. 34. Action for tlie value of work done in paving tlie cellar of defen.laiit'H house with stone. Defendant admitted t:,at the work had been dotie, but pleaded that ■• had been done without his kiDwledge, onlcr -r consent diirin- hi.s absence, and that plaintiff had said wlieii lioing It that he did not intend to chan'e for it but that It was to be a -iff to the defen.Jant.' iie ottered to allow plaintiff lo take awav tin- stone on condition of replacing the premises i,, the condition in which thev were before. Plea IV. May take up DA.MAUES FOR A DELIT. IX.STANCE IN ACTION OF _ 33. Action of damages l)v an ex-volunteer for iMipi-isonment and hardship sufjered bv him at the hand.s of the ott^cers of the regiment after the expiration of his term of engagement— //cW, that though the right tosuch action was purely personal and could not be instituted bv his heirs, that nevertheless itc.uld be continued by tliem, where it had been instituted by the person liim.self previous to his death, and that thev cou|,| succeed to the claim. Thompson v. Sirange, 5 Q. L. II. 205, S. C. lH7i). *As,eii(1anb nhtnt to the exclii.icm of all otli.rH proix-r y giv-n by t'.em to tlieir cliilrtien or o lie? dm-eiuiant. who die witliout issue, wh. re the ol Jct^ Eivn an- mill in kinrt In the si.ocessi', n, and Ith. vTavo have ImU ot resumiiig the property thus given, eao <; c. t Cannon v(»'NVii, l re. k. ig,,. h^h v. McNHI, 4 HIRING TEAMS. I. At Elections, see election law. Cor- Ri'PT Practice.s. ' HOMOLOGATION. BUTIUV^'^''"'''^ of DisTBiBcnoN, sec DISTRI- HORSES. I. Action for Redhibitorv Vice in. II. Liability for when out at PASTnR;B. I. Action for Keuhibitouy Vice m. 35. Appellant bouglit a hor-e froim res|.,n- (ient o,i the 6th May, on th-- 9th h*' took the horse „ome. On the 2(ilh, 17 dav.s aJfter tukun' the horse home, he brouL'hr action ibr a nii^e redlnlnbiire—HM, in appeal, confirming the ,)iidgnient of the court below, that while the court woul.l not be bound bv the nitie liavs rule laid down m the custom, ,und tblU.wed'in the judgment of the court klow, that the delav was too loiiir, and the action was properly dimiriHf*.i Doiii/i^r^ Murplnj, 2 L. K. 94, Q. B. iev9. 11. Liability for whe.v oit at Pasture. 3(i A person who takes a bor.se to pasiiire is lia lie tor injurv to the horse bv accident, snch H< having ,!,.. leg hr<>krr5, un!:;.:. he can pr„^. that he was no way in limit, Belanger v. Uiit- tier, 9H. L. 530, 8. C. 1879. S. 352 TAV.LE. m CuiMi.vAi, Mat- POX, see CIlIMr 3 ROADS. VND LESSEE EEVANT. of work done in laiit's liouse with that tlie work IihiI ■ r had been (Idrie iir coii'jcnt dui'ini' itr had Paid when i to I'.hari^e for ii, lo the defenihint. to take away the ij the premises in ere before. Plea je, 7 11. L. 603, MS. ['ION LAW, Cor- [ON". ION, see DISTRI- Vice m. AT PASTrRK. Vice &. 'c f'roim res|»Mi- )th h*" took tiif laysaJiler takuig ction tor a nice coMfflrniini; tiie tliat while tlie e II i fie ilays rule loll.. wed in tlie at the delay was perlvdieni'iK.-e.i, Q. it. 18V9. \T Pasture. '.«e to paHiure i- accident, sncli " he can pr..v. ilanger v. Qvit- 353 HOURS. HOTELKEEI'EIiS— 6'ec BAIL- MENTS. I. I.lAmi.lTV OK. II. LiAiiiMiv OF Boarders. JI[. PlUVlI.EIlK.S OK. J V. KllillT.S OK. I. Liability of. 'M. A holelkeeper is liable for the value of tilings rnwsiii^' fmin the runm of a Knest, where he lails to ))rove that the loss was caused bv a Ktniiiger and the conlrilmtorv nef,'ligence of"the 'oT'im'''''^''" ^ ^'■"'""'■'■' ^' ^'- ^- J- ^ti5. IL LlAIlII.ITY OF LOAUDERS. 'M. A boarder in a boarding house cannot takeaway his things until he pavs his board. Downie & Jiarrie, 'J ii. L. al'i, S. U. 1879. III. Privilege of. 39. Action of revendication to recover posses- Piuii of two zinc covered boxes containing boot and shoe samples, valued at $150, the property of the plaiiititis, and alleged to be unlawfully detained by the delendants. Plea, that I ho defen- dants, as innkeepers, had u lien up.m the .said goods lor a sum ul .f.'iO, due them tor board and Kxlgmg by the plaintitPs traveller, who had bruiight the goods t,, the hotel with him, and who, eaving without settling his board bill, iiad left the goods in delendant's hands. Plaintilf proved ownersiiip of the effects revendicated and the value of the goods, and that they had teen demanded of defendants before suit. From the evidence it appeared also that they were placed in the sample room, while the traveller occupied a private sleeping room with his personal baggage, and that on his departure he owed the defendant $M-Held, that an inn- keeper can exercise lus privilege tor food and accommodation fun!;.ished to a guest upon etiects brought mto the iotel bv such guest, though sot hm property, iad aot forming part of lus baggage. Fogartg v. I}ion, 6 Q. L. Ii. 163, S. C . IV. RiQHTs or 40. Where the plaintifT leased a room at $2 a month from delendant, a lotlgmg house keeper, lurnishei it herself and cooked lier own meals in it— Held, that she was a lodger within tne ineaning ot y. 39 Vic cap. 23, * and that (lelendant was entitled to retain her etiects until payment ot rent. Lalo.uM v. McGlinu, 3 L. N . '■'4, C. C. 1880. HYPOTHEC. 354 HOUSEHOLD EX?ENSES-;See iMAKlilAGE. HOUSES. I. AllE r.M.M.lVEABI.ES TllOlOH TIIKV BELONfi TO A DIKKKIiKNT I'KRSON KKO.M TlIK ,;uOINU ON WHICH TllEV STA.M), ,UC PiiUPEliTY, DESCRIP- TION' OF. HUSBAND AND WIFE-&e MAR- lilAGE. HOUES. • Vide I. Dig. p. 67S, Soto. HYPOTHEC. I. Action on. IL Creatki) hv Do.s.nio.v. III. I'ELAISSK.MK.NT. IV UELE(iATioN OF, See OBLIGATIONS Accepfduce of, y. Descrii'tio'.vop Lands IN. V 1. Kfkect of. VII. Fro.m Husband to Wife. VIII. Give.v by Ali.voR. IX. GivKN- BY Wife Separate as to Pro- perty, FOR iloLSKIIOLl) NKCKSSAIUES IS .NULL X. Liability ok liEiiisTRAU for omission of IX Certificate. XI. Liability or Tiers Dete.vteuu after Delaisse.mext. XII. Personal Liability on. Xill. Petitio.v to AN.M'L. XIV. Prescription of. XV. Priority of. XVI. Kegistration of. vYrlh ^^.^■"^^^AL OF, see REGISTRATION. c W\IV, ^^S«I''1AT10N OF Sale BY REASON OF, XIX. RlUHTS OF IlYPOTnECAKY CREDITOR. AA. iiiGHTs OF Tiers Uetenteur. XXI- RUiHT TO I.MPROVE.MENTS. XXII. Transfer ok durino period fixed FOR Renewal ok Reoisthation. XXIIL Value ok as against Vendor's Pri- riLEGE, see REGISTRATION. " » ^ «i XXIV. Validity of. I. Action on. 41. A third party in whose favor char.res are made m a deed of donation of real estate may bring liypothecary action ajiinst the detcuteur ot the immoveaoie, altho.igl, tliere he no stipu- lation to that eflect in the deed. JJu/resueXr Uuhord, 1 L. N 43, y. B. 1877. ■^'""' ^ 42, An action in declaration of a hypothec for a sum ot $3t; cannot l,e brought i„ \L Cir- cua Court. Massg & CoU, 3 Q. L. R. 322, C. C. nif^V-^"*' 'i T' gf'/"'^'! a hypothec to the p.am,t.ff,andals. md. 00k to keep certain pro- BT"-". ■■/.■■■'■'"■>' I-". ,'■ "'^ coiiateral security. Pia^ntiil sued dele da,.t, a third holder, under said hypothec for a ,.„a„ce due, and in confu- ting tb* balance included four items of ebc ^ ' 1 355 HYPOTIIEC. HYPOTHEC. 356 dollarH oftcli for prciniimis paiil for Hjiiil in«ur- ancf, and nix liollurH and lllti' (iciitscost ofdced and rejiiHtrniiMii— //»•/(/, llmt there wa.« no hypollicc I'lir Hn(di ainniinti-, and ihorcforc no action ajiainct ilflendanl, who was a mere holder and never nndertook to pay them. Mic.kon k Mi>rciir,/,ii Q, L. |{. 2:iH, S.'O. 1877. 4;i. In a hv pot hecaiT action the plaintitf'niay pray that the. delendant he concieinned to na'v uiilenH he prefers to al)iindon, allhoiiirli Ari. 20(!1 ol' the Civil Ccwle wavn that llie hvpolhe- cary action \h to iiave the ilel'en(hinl condemned to ahandon nidess iip prefer.-" to pay. Lechur & FUii,ii, 7 11. L. -128, C. C. IH-f). 44. Anil where the plaiiilitl' hud heen a party to an e.\cluin;;e of propeilies hetween iheilonee of the plaintilt and the defendant, and had declared that he accepted thedefendanl as his personal delitor, a« if the donatiorj had lieen made to him, and in consequemie that he dis- chargeil the donee personally withonl novation or derogation— /W,/, that the plaintiff had not thcrehy deprived liimself of hi.s hypothecary recourse against the delendant. lb.' 4'). The ordinary hypcjtiieeary action cannot be excrci.~ed against an assignee who is in pos- pcssion of immoveable property of an estate in his (jualily as .such. Duwcn & Fulton, 1 L. N. 24H, S. (;. IH78. 46. Jli' the delegation. Action against Iwllidelendaiits jointly and sever- ally— 7/,/,/, thut iiohsithslanding the ddajui had paiii several in,-laimeiits of tiie inoiiev undertaken to be paid liy him in the deed of siiie, that the plaintilfs had no rights under ;; without expre>s ac-ceptance of the delegation, and the accei)tance which they had signified was too late as being subsecpient to the retro- cession. t Iai Si>'-iiU4 I'trmiiuenle de Cimntntc- tiun V. Leonard, 2 L. N. 148, S. C. 187'J; 1029 C C V. Description oi' Land in. 51. Ry 40 Vic. cap. 10, Art. 2042 of tlie Civil Codeit is amended .'o as to make valid descrip- tion.') of land by lot or range. VI. Effect of. 52. A hypotliec given for a credit opened in favor of the mortgagor takes etiect from the time it is granted and not from the time the arlvance is actually made. Quintal & Lefebore, 3 L. N. 347, S. C. 1880. VII. Fro.m Husband to Wife. 63. A mortgage given by a husband to his wife, nejmriie de biens, is not necessarily void. Bank of Toronto k Perkins, 2 L. N. 252, S. C. 1879. * .Since reversed in Supreme Court but not reported. See 3 h. N. 383 & 4 L. N. 106. t Confirmed on appeal. See 4 L. N. 38. t Conventional liypothecs are not valid unlefs tlio deed specially de.scrilies tlie immoveable hypothecated, with t designation of the coteimiuius land, (or) of the uumber >'!• name nnik-r which it is Ijuown (or of the lot and range or part uf lot and range), or of its number upon the plan and book of reference of the registry oHice if such i)lan and book of reference exist. 2042 C, C. EC. 356 357 HYPOTHEC. Iieappt'llftiit, TIrtc lliinl li • tlio vendor iMKcici ■ .e.s, .eiiilccs, lypolliccary iiclinn rc-'poiidi'iit iiml liis iido u ilrl'f^'^'^''='»>-y action, atid the tia., delenieur having abandoned, the former was now preclmied from bringing a personal action. Judgment of the court bebnv reversed and action dismissed. JUoufre,, Permanent Budding Society v. Desauteh, S. e It. 1877. XII. Personal Liability on. 58. The defendant was tiers detenteur of a plr IT 7'"'i''7"r ''-VP^'tl'^c ,n favor of atii ed' T "■'!'':''. ;,.^'POtljec defendant had a-Muied. Ihepaintm sued in declaration of '-.liypothec and olitained judgn, „t, and he letendant then niade a esauteU & U SM de cl struct,,.,, r.,nndienne dr Montreal, 2 L. N. 147 r>. U. 11 I ^ , ), 'I Xfll. I'ktITIONS to ANNl'L. 5I» In petitions e„ radhtion d'hinwthiwie the hyp,, bees to be striHd< „i,t musr^H. s, ! i.llv .Icscnbed and each of the ,li,schatges .roller papers relied on must be ileseriU.,! in the same way and a regular list of ,• l,|,„ f! ll /; .,,, ycr ic JkGa,p6, 4 Q. L, ' S. (J. is77 ' ""^ XIV. Prescription (,, 00 On the contestation of an opm.sition '"'■Nded on a constituted rent with ,t cren ed in ISIS, and the last ackn, ■' of wliieh was liec 0"wleilgiiieiit liirly-threeyeai-previou.s- ^/VA bat a hypothec lM.i,.g but the a :;^. yiebt and has no e.vistence apart from nllud he extinetion of the personal debt by pres.ri ' jon carries with it therefoie the e.x" i i /^f :r, '.-r 'T' ''^•'•" "■''^■'•^' <'»' latter ha e, preserved by acts of leen -,. , . ,■, , iiiterriiption. ]li,ii„l v JJo.ayetSi lial>y, 4 Q. L '{. I'js, S. C isT 1878. XV. Priority of. 01. Contestation of an assii-nee's dividend 877, aciuired a title to the property s nee sold by hi.s assign,.,., and the procee.ls of w li,h he va.s about tod.stnbute. The insolvent, h ever had been in possession of the proJ.,,, )^Zl 18,0, when the terms of sale had Wn a.-ree.l upon, and the v,.,i,lor had allowe,! h, t f taTe posse.ssio.i. The veiKlor, exaniined as a w, ness .aid that the dee.l was not passe,! in Is , be- cause the parties could not inake it convenient to meet. Hefore obtaining his title the b si .^, ontheI2thJnne, I877,gaveal^g^^^^^^^^^^^^^ property to the (x,nt,.stant, which wa> hi • re- gstereil. Alter obtaining his title he 4 e two other mortgages on the property to the par ties c.docate,|, which were registert^d on th.f^i: of Uct., 18n. 1 he contestation then was l.-twei^ Wo mortgages, one acquire,! and enre -,, . re,] iiefore the mortgagor himself had ob • , e,1 and registered his title, aii,l one give i afte iw rds lleld, that notwithstanding the laii e|, s, ,f Art 2098 of the Civil Co,le,* the exi^ten e L 1 rank of tl.e first nientione,!' mdrtJ.'S" e^e ^,^ tabhshed by the subsequent regi.sUuuion of the mortgagor's title, ami as the other was not ,1, taine.t tun! registered until after^lnC 1 ad no priority y^.,,,. /„ re, Q. L. U., S. C S n„P l/ i" "V ""^'''"'"ge ^y which in effect one I . declared among other things that he hypo hecate,! certain real estate for any debt which he might thereafter owe to the pfamtitf and the question was as to the vali.! ty^of sudl a mortgage The dateof the deed wa,s the 17U February, 1874, and by it It. declared that he wag re:if,^e;:3f..^el';,^eta''Lt\'rl„a'^ I'l Sj^.. ^>^ \.\^ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-S) // 1.0 I.I I^ lis 111112:0 IL25 i 1.4 1.6 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 iV \ :\ '^;^ '' [\P L<*r ^ 359 HYPOTHEC. HYPOTHEC. then iii(lpl)te(l to the plaintiff' in the amount of certain piunii.s.«ory note,<, and that u» collutcial Sfcurity for the payment of the siiiil note" ' ainiii que lie touten aitlre.s- summes qu'il pourn'i " liii decuir aulremriif il ,i par rt.i pir.seiiti'.i " hypvlhvquHentiwmrdn dit l\ 'J. I).,jn.s,iua coiirun-aice ouglit to enforce payment of that amount an'a\' duly registered given by the husband siUh". queiit to the death of hig \vife. Dallaire (k Gravel, 22 L. C. J. 286, & 2 L. N. 15, Q. Jj. 1878. 04. 'I'he fact of the existence of a first mort- 360 gage being mentioned in a second mortgage will not relieve the lir.st mortgagee I lom tiie nece.ssityol registration to preserve lii.s priority Jeannotte & La Cic. de I'rit k Credit Fonder, 24 L. 0. J. 28, S. U. 1878. 65. A liypolliec registered within thirty days of tlio insolvency of the person granting it'i.t without eliecl to give to the mortgagee a privi- lege on the proceeds ol the estate of the msol- vent. Du-yer & Fubre &, MeCarron, 24 L. C. J 174, S. 0. 1879. 60. A hypothec of the Corporation of Three Rivers for moneys advanced under tlie authori- ty of 20 Vic. cap. KiO, does not require recris- tration in order to preserve its privilege, p'elo- quin tfe La Hocietii de Conntruction ,St° Jacnues 3 L. N. H48, S. C. 1880. ^ ' XIX. Rights of HvfOTnECARY Creditor. 67. A purchased a lot of land at sheritPssale witliout paying the purchase money. He sub- sequently exchanged it with B, who agreed to give to the sheriff' the required security and to pay the mortgages. Alter .security was given to the .sherilf the property was irregularly sold at the Jhlle cnchire ot A, and again re.sold by the sheriff on the second purchaser, li then claimed the proceeds of this sale as the price revioii.s hypothecs, to scouritV On ac- jiiiil in di.-Jiharge of e to that on which t not on account le pliiintitt; as tliiit jnnient, and liiiling V the plairitilt' tlie lult & Desjardina, JNTS. a property {which a for $7,000, which inhseqtiently the i'hypotfiec and oU ntthen niadearfe- judjjtnent ami the ilierofdouble win- trthereiipon is.sueil thegronnd of de- lashed on petition, viilence taken on ealinent. On tlie t'dffendant, being ec and personally ' debt, could not '•vfts' and amelioi- J. C. the property uridition in which nient, which was •St have damages. Hidknne de Moid- . C.187U; 2005 & tj Period fixed N. othecary claim ir the renewal le transfer con- prefcribed by II nut give to the Jthec, unle.s.s the notice preHcribed 'eaii, fl Q. L. U. hypotliec may which has been loh sale !i.ih not Bianchaud, I I. li. 1878. IXXKEEPRU.S. LV.SCKICTION. Paok ILLEGAL ARI;e.ST .(,;, ILLECilTrMATEClIlLDUEX..'.'.".'..""" -m ILL-TREATMENT... , .„.., ,„ IMMOVEABLES '''::^::z ';::;|i^"'-''"'^'"»^i^M"Arx IMPENSES AMELIORATIONS..! IMPRISONMENT LMPROBATION m PRO VEM ENTS ".'.*."..'""' IMPUTATION .'.'.".'..... INCIDENTAL DEMAND...". .'.'."*"" INDECENT ASSAULT. ■MV.\ INSOLVENT LVSOLVENcy INSPECTION LAW.. INSTRUMKNTS IXSL'RAXCE INTE.iDICTION INTEREST ' INDKMNITY^^T""^ f;^ | 'NTERFKRENCE.' ." ! MS ■M\H ■ifiH INDIANS INDICATION DE PAIEMENT." INDICTMENT \\ INFANTS IX FORMA PAUPERIS........ INFRINGEMENT INIIKRITANCE \\\\\ IXJL'NCTION .....'. INJ URES VERBA LES . ! .'." .'',, INJURY 308 'MH .'iOD .■iOl) :wj .3(li) .•!7,5 .■i75 IXTERIM RECEIPT IXTERLOCUTORY .fUDOMEXT" LNTERPRr.TATION IXTERROC.ATORIES ..! IXTERRUPTION IXTERVENTION IXTOXICATING LIQUOR. . . .."'.' fXVEXTORY IXVESTMEXTS .".".'.!..'.' IRREGULARITIES.... ILLEGAL ARREST. I. Damages for, see DAMAGES. ILLEGITIMATE CHILDEE.Y. I. Maixtenaxceof. II. Filiation of. I. Maintenakx'e of. oi-ij'^!'^, '!'''"''"''''"*' ''""'er of an ille(rit|,„ntp child, had been condemned to pav an"al„ncn. Btta ned U years ot age. At the age of 1 7 the •^'x'i, u g,r , being of weak iiiiellect and unable to support herself, the mother sued as tutrix Ibr Paoe .. 375 .. 375 . 375 . 375 . 375 . 398 . 398 . 398 . 416 . 410 . 420 . 420 . 420 420 420 420 420 422 422 422 422 13 J- An action i„ declaration of paterni.v and '■ Miainlenance for the chiM n ,i, l ; • i ^.; anajMionofdanuigeslonh; ,1,: ;^";;;' 363 IMPRISONMENT. IMPRISONMENT. 364 II. Filiation of. 4. Action liy liliiintilt, a minor, .assisted hv Ills tutor in iloclaratiori ol'liis piilcriiilv. I'lniii- titl was tlie ill<"};itiMialc cliilil of onV .Martha DiiwxPM, hy wiioni lie was horn in .Jannarv, iKti'), acciinliiijr lo licr storv ; Iml, aceunlini: to a Doctor Ijawri'Mue, ii] .laini'ary, lS74. In order to ccrrolionite the statement 'of the mother, a pretended certilicate of liaplisMi was proihiced, whieli stated tiiat the cliild was haplized in' May, l«7o, hy a Rev. M. Woodrich, Imt ilid nut state ol what eliurcli, parisli ur (;oiii;rej;alion, nor as to the re^iister in which it was entered, nor whethiM' any was kept hy the minister, nor as to his ollicial cliaraeter. 'The paoer was not sijrned hy the minister, hut hy one Chapman. Such was not an cxirnil iti' hiiplhiif aceordini' to Art. 45 of tiie Civil Code.* Action dis^ missed mnifu .■KUTV O.V WlhCH TIIKV STA.M), .W I'ltOPKHTV. ly. liYeoTltKCATION OF, .•«',■ IIYI'OTUHC. V. MlNOK CANNOT TitANSKKR WITIIOIT .\l- THoiuzATioN, .s'ce MIXtJKI TY. VI. PiticscHii'TioN OF, see I'RESCRIPTIOX. VI f. Riioi.sTKATio.N OF, See REtilSTRA- TIO.V. VIII. Sai.k of, .vet' sale. IX. SinziuK OF iiKFoiu: Iidcmknt. X. TitAXsFKR OF AFTKR .\cTI0N iiROLlillT. SeC TRANSFER. XI. \Vii.\T ARK, wc PROPERTY, Desorii- TIO.N OF. IX. SkIZIRE of !!EF0RK Jl'DO.MKXT. 5. Under a writ, of saisie arret hefore judj:- ment the imniovcahle property of the dehtor may he seizeil. CorOci/ v. C/iarbuitiieau, 3 L.N. 381, S. C. 1881. IMPENSES ET AMELIORATIONS —S>x: HYPOTHEC. I. ACTIOX FOR FaI.SK. fi. An action will not lieajiainst a justice of the peace hy „ii iniliviilual who has heen ille- : fially cimdemneil to tine and imprisonment if the justice of the peace does not appear under the ; circnm-iances to have acted willuliv and without 1 snilicient and prohahle cau.se. Mur'oisSi, liohluc ^ 7 R. L. lis, Q. R. 1H75 : 7. And the judfjmerit or convictioe rendereil hy the jii>;tiee of the oeace protects its autiior ; (rom all liahility in ilamageM as long as it ro- \ nuiins in tiirce. Ih. 8. There is no action of damaxos for false im- prisonment simply hecau-e the person arrested IS innocent ; it is also necessarv to estahlisl; j that the perxin who caused the arrest was with- i out reas^mahle >rri"- J90 c"^l5 1""^ ""** ""' "^^'-''^'""6 one dollar pur week 305 IMPRISONMENT. not Pinploye.) tlicri'l,,- inci.rriM.' a lan-P n„ I no. I,e rui-.,| ,v u 1, a '' X" '''"■■"'";"-^ ''""I'' •'"■'•'■'•ore Ik. I „ , " '^ '"""' «'"l '! '"'IX !■>■ Arhl, .svw/,/,., tliiii a 1,1,1 r„i, , ' • n. A ,k.|tMiila.]( i« iiahlo t„ p,K.,vivP Im pns,.im„.„i urMiT C. C J' 7,k2 » , ,"'"*^ ""■ ■^ '-■ ^"'"!i„;;!i;;,;:,.™'i,;;;»;£;£ IM PROBATION. /, '''"y, 3 L. N. ,, '"■ -MiMliUU'll. J ,)ii,|gMK-Mt wf ,t ajiaiMst tl,e (lelVn.lant lor a ccrl, ,,, aiMuMMt „f ilainag... f,.r assaiil. T < p inn 1 M„ne, ,0r his commK-ne,,,, ).,; , avnent The plai„t,tlM„l not sav a„v. ftl"^..t M^'mhcation of co,,v of the- "i,!,!.;,, , t~ He snoukl have net up ,{,at lo„r .„ '. , h , j lapsni .since the eo,,y of the jn,|.r,ncnt ha I he *• ve.| on the Jelen.lant. Fur v^ , ,!, a ^jrat,on the application to;'., i,,*^ ^^ ii-ini';:;;t;;«;r;::r:;rS;'-!;:;iTi;:: t^'/^'ry V. Chulun, 3 L. X. 2'J2. Q. TlL "al.. of the propmv ofl ,,!,■' ''''■''"''''',^' ^"'"-'"^ «'"' ^••izur^saju.lJ ^ "^' ;'";•« '''''''''':"to|.r..<,.nt tlio '" "■ei.uVi nmlorder t u 7 <-'>"''•«"'" n 1 1 Hie |i.Avors 3G6 ;;';;;^Hh,a.e4'.^i:!:/;:SK:.^ liK .:; :::^:;;;:^7';'''';''r-'''''"''-'''^'i ' 'i'-i>'ii^ n,ivi: T ir'';''''''"'""'" 8:;(-'\^S.*"^"""- ^'"•'^-•■/'".y,3i:x::S;i; .Infe' .'h,:'";"'''!""' '!"l";'''-"»"l ("rfaih.re to ,,ro. lOi;, y. J{. isso ' '^' <-"//'■>'.'/ ..'7'., 3 L. N. V. Or Mivoit. :;t-:;;;:;r?;;;-;;;;;i;;rai:ia "" "'(• J.n-onn,l .i;-it"."lV,.;7.'',"""""" ""■"•'•'"■-'''I. .vasona^.eorprohahle.iUnTu.r'lh:::,:'';^ ^ VI. Ok Pkksons ovkk Skvkxtv Tkah. of , 24. See remarks of Ills f]oi„,r [,„i„„ i> V'll. Wakha.vt of. a4m tV. ",'■"■''■"" ,"'■ ,'"'l"-i^on,neMt i>.„ed 7,: '" ' ■' '''■'■'*"" "-lio l>as not been ai,k t ish.snre,,e.s u. keep , he peace nns.llc.'e 'li'" the cornpkiirjant , eelares he f,..,, P a'^^"7'l "ill ,k, hnn ImIiIv ar m L "^ '^'•'Huva,ene.l,o,lolunH;,,|,l7;ura 1 ,'it -riri:,:;;;;:::,:;;:i,s;~:;'%T^ EH:;:;'fJf-";:::ni:n=S uiat .sncli costs need t,.,i ^,^. detai'eil n. i',o -on,n„tn,eM.. /6.. i(, u. L. Mt) ^' '' ,;«o:''^' «elzi-n«cre,iu,r it^ "ml,"'' HJ^'" «"■""'■' >lue t„'tl,„ ' "■ value of the efl"!, w Wp "^1^' "P"" Vxlxbli'miiK IMPIKJBATIOX. I. AiM'K.u, Bv Xor.un- ix Slm-pout of KvinK.VTK IX St ITOHT OF. K.XI'KltllSK. (iiioi'xns uF. Of .Siikiukf's II. Ill IV V. CIAI,, V f. Ol- S|Il,lilFF\s T'lTI.F Eill'TlSx '"■■'■'"'' «^"'*'''^^'"» i^v.^ee PE t- VIII. WutX KECtSSAKY. Rki'.iit, .see sale, Jfdi- V «11 'ill '4 867 TMPROBATION. I. Api'Eai, by Notary in- Sn-ponT of Dkkd. 27, Wliprc, liy n jii(lj;mpnt of tlic Superior Coiiit, n iIpimI \viiHil('(!liiri'i)y(/i(.T, tlic iiotiirv lic- f'nrc wliiitn it was cxcciilcil, iiiid wlio was one of the Hitiif-.-,«es in the ^'uil. was allowcil to !i|ipcul oil lil'Cnll'ilii; (r.«.v/((/l//()//7'nrtlie llflit. Difiill iV Forti', ;! li. N. .'k;, g. w. is?;*. JI. Kvii>t:Nci: in Siitokt ok. 2S. Ill nii_ ncliiiii inn depil tlip ilefeiidiint in- fcrilicil en ftiiix H'iMwsl it. Tlio ilccii wii.i very liiidly mid ilU'irilily written, and tlie ."uliscriliinj,' wiliio-i swfire positively tluU lie was nut pre- Keiit iind did not siirii it." 'I'lie notary's diuijlliter on tlie contrary swore tliat the witness was pre- sent and did siirii it -llihl, tli;it tlie evidence of tlie wilne-^s sliniild prevail, and tlie inscription was niaintained. Difini & Fork, ;i L. N. ;iG, Q. 15. {^Vd. ■ ■ III. ExfKRTlSE. 2!). Ill an action in improliation of a deed — Ili'ld, that where, in conse(]nence of a deeil hav- iiii; been drawn up and the dillereiit parts of it jiiil tujretiier in an nniisiiaily shiveiily way. there IS niniii lor don lit as to the ;.'eiinineness of'pai'l of it, an expertise may he ordered as to the (reniiine- r^e.ss of that part of the deed to which such doiilit rehites. Jhwiel k Panel, 3 Q. L. R. 17,"!, p. C. ls7(i. IV. GROL'N'nS OF. .so. The plaintiff' ,soM the defendant by deed belbre iiolary a lot of land in the district cif lit d ford, on the north side of Pike River. A lion t a year afterwards he discovereil, lor the lirst time, as lie alle^'ed in his declaration, that the deed omitted to contain a reservation of a mill pile which lie stated he had not intendeil to sell. Action in iniprobation, prayinj; to be allowed to inscribe at Jiiiix afiainst the deed in question, and that it be declared " false, erroneous and 'null, save and exoept as niodilied, restricteil "and ()ualilied by the insertion after the de- scription of the lands therein mentioned of a clause cuiilainini: a reservation of the mill site ill ipie-lion, and thai the said clause be a(ljiid;£e I T M 4B2, & 23 L. C. J. 10, Q. B. 1878. *' ^ ^' ^^ III, DiSREOARU OF. X A rule for contempt of court will not lie against the secretary of a railway con"pan because the company disregards an injuuS orderin ( r-rderinu' it to cease certain work-. Timw,, v. '74' U J!"l"'-"' *' '' ''^^ ^^' '••■ ^^■' •'^ ''• ''• IV. Form ok. .-i?. Arlioi, l,v plainlitts ajrain-t tlKMlefcridants, be Quel,..,. Railway C.,mu,i it was in the nature of a proi-eeiiing by nian,laiiius or iiijniK.tion, ami wa.s not ucc,mi|,ii„ie,| Willi an »tli,layit as re,Miir,.,'i by law. //,.,/. (hat as an onlinary a.:tion, it, mist bebei, lube perli'dly regular wlmteyer 8k.'l";;;;'^'c:'i;;;;;:'''-^''''''^''-'^-'^''^''''. V. Oiioixns OK. ;W The petitioners aske,l for an injunction against he resp,„„lents to restrain thin, fr.,m cj.mniiiting the, lues colleetcl on lloiitiiig steam Mai,,is. I he llarl„,r Commissioners obj,.cle,| ' ;" "M'lcr Art. I)'J7 C. C. P.' the pro.;ee,li„g should haye been taken in Her Majesty's nam," iccaiise It comphiineil that a public lioanl was Molating the proyisi,,,,- of the Act by which . was g.,ye,.,ie,l. //,,/,/, that as the'eyLleiKJ^ laile,! loili.soiose any .laniage siillercl by peti- ■oners, an, as the proceclings shoiiM hale been .ken 111 ler Miijesty's name, the iiijunctio., .0 ist be 'I -.-o|ye,l '/'/,. .S7. L,nrrn,;.r Sleam S: x:7^^'s.c.s. '''"■''''■ ''''''''^'^^''''''^'•^' M. On a motion to -lissoKe the injunction SMU.,1 by petitioner to restrain the resp,,|„k.nts ''■""1 lieu nig witi, the fninis of the I!,,ar,l. 01, the groM,i,| that pet,tioner'.s right- an,l interest in tbe fund were iiilly ^e,.ure,i-//,/,/, that as the capital of the tun,| lia.| been materially ,|imin ishe, since the passage ,,f the Act, Q.";{,S Vie cap. 1.1, transferring it t,, the new RoanI, the ijeti tioner was entitle,! I,, the injunction, notwith- 8tan,lingil wasaseriou.s iiiconyeuienoe to those * 111 tlie following ease.i • a,.t; ai'a'i.",'rnn'!-„r'^ as.i..n('ranilolh('rst(i jn,|;.'(M>|ihiMi.lvi. naliililvof tlic iiropoHeil Ica-p, ami it-kin" that tliev lKTcstniin.Mlli.ini IniMintrsaiil incoliir" iind HaiK'liunin^' ^aid lease until il.ev slmnhriiave ful.|iiitle,|l(.tlieHharehul,|,.,N,,|.;ai(l C.inpanv at a meeting; tinlv cajjed. Iiijl and detailed ne- coiinlsaiid .-tateineiitH ofihcairairs ,.lMiid ("niii- imi.y, ele. Kvidence that the report a.-snluMil- te.l an, the proposed lease were approved of l,v tiK' holders ofa lar^'e nmjoritv of the shares, niHl also that the shares of |,,.liii,,ner had no .«.. ciinmry value. //.M. that ivhil,. i|„. ,.„mt jvoiild .nterlVre to proleet an individual inein- lier, If the proeeediiiKsot the niajoriiv eonsiitnte 811 iiijiistiee, vet as the inajoritv appeared to he acting with refriihirity and /,„ii,) fi,/rs, ami with- out improper or eoniipt iiilliieine, that the coiut woiiM not interfere, and thi. petition was theielore dismissed. Jik/iis v Moii/mil, I'orl- ...',"■ V, ''.'"■'"" ^''"'■/"■".V <'"; 2 1-. N. 20;i, A- 2.! L. C. ,]. 1(11, S. (", IsT!). -n. Appeal from a ,jiid;;iiient of the Superior Court at Moiilieal, dismissiim a motion toniiash nn mjiinciion. The injiiiiution was taken l,v the respondent, who was the eontractor tor thV con.-^tnieiion of the Montreal, Ottawa an,l Oeci- dental JJailway, to prevent the Coverninent from talld the -aiiie on hehalfof the Coniiiii8sioiierof I'lihlio Works. The iniune- tion issued, hilt the Goveriinipnt pnK'eeded' witii the work of taking over the railway. On a iiiotion tor contempt of court a<,'ainst the sheritf o( Montreal and the Oovermiient eii..'inepr, and a motion to (piash the injiin tioii heard at the fame liine,jiiil^ment was rendered inaintainim' the iiiMiiicii.m aii Snp,.ri,.r Court-//,./,/, that that eourt had the power to i.ssu,. Hich or,l,.r, hut would not exer- cise It unles.s the party [K'titionim: were without I'tl.or remedy and exposal ,„ i.-reparahle in. JMi-y, espeeially If the issue of the injunction VII. I'Rioii TO QiKiu:,' lN.ifx,-Tiov Act. I:"). For a full dis.Mtssion of th" !,.,v of in .lunelions prior to (^,el.e,< A.^t, 41 Vi,-, eai. 14. .s,v I,,,,;, Si ]i.,„r,l l„r Ihf .U,n„„!rwn,t ..I' Tait- pnnihh,:, F„i„l, s K. L. ;(, Q. jj, iH7ii • Vlir. UmiiT TO, see Orgi-nds or. .,' T,''^ \ "••|«"-ntion of the city of Mont.eal, on the. ird April. IS72. I.y virtne.d' the Act (^ M V ic. cap. ,!,, see. .'i. which aiitiiorized the C,,r. |)orationo( Montreal, through the Council, to suhscnhe to such numiier o( shares as the Cr- |)oration should deem e.xpedient in any railw.nv ccunpany, pas,siHl a hy-law which pr,)vi,le,l thai -iili.iect to the consent of the .pialilied elect,.rs' ol the city, the Mayor should he authorize,! to suliscnhe (or one hundred thousand shares of ^tock m the Montreal Xorthern Colonization itailwny Company, and that a special rale ,,r assessment was to he impose,! up,,,, all rateable real property in the city Ibr the purpo.ses eon- template,! l,y the by-law. This' by.law was pubhshe,! for the first time on tlie fiftli of ^1||>||I, l.'^,2, an,! was to |,e submittal to the vote ot the ratepayers on the 27lh. Previous to lat- er,!ate the plaintitl took a.^tion against the I orporation, .setting up tliese liicts, an,laskin.' that the Corporation an,! its ollicers be onlertM to abstain fiwn taking further procee.lin-s jintil final judgment in the cause, an,! that the by-law be annulled as illegal and ullm rir,so( the Cor|,oration. /Iel,l, on .lenuirrer, that while II Corporator siitl'ering an actual injury mi.dit have an action m his own name to restraiii a Corporation, that un,!er the circumstances, the by-law not having been approve,! by the electors, no injury ha,! been,!nn<-. an,! the action was premufure.' Mohn,, & T/w M,v/,.r,d'c.,of Montmil. 2,{ L. C. J. 1(1<», Q. ]}. iH7(i. '' 17. In an action vii iiartm/c et licitadnn after the return ot the writ, a petition, supporte,! I..y alfi, avit.s, was presented, alleging that thedefen- Uant was m possession of the entire of tlie pro- wit h the biisine.-.,. Onier refuse,!. Dcmers ic Lomarc/ie, 3 L. N. 117, S. C. li. im. hv*th!!i"'A''?',"'T.'," I,"''"""" V"« 8"b.«equr>ntlv conflrmod y the A w lulu the [i,j„iu;tio,i Act olQ„elii.e.41V c. Cnii 14 iiink,* 3Sd,t'nH '"';"" '"' """ ''/"" "f 1-Junctlons'on the dl' uiuim of private jicrsons.— Ed. .173 INJINCTIOX. INJUNCTION. 374 per OS ,vl,oro„| ||„. p|u,„ti(l a,„| i,,,^ ,„i„or chiMrcn and i|„. ,|,.|i.,„|,,„, „.,,,.,. ,.„-,,n.i,ri..|„rs jmr n,,l,n.s: ||,„, tl„, ,,lu„iliir vv.is Jr.-,liMv i„- l..ri..(.,l aiMl v..nl.v l.rli.-vcl ihut i|„. ,l,-(Vii;iunt wiH (ot,iMmiMi.M,) Inulc with tl,<. u» id..l and n.;:nlated l,v tlie laws of Kn.-land li.r the protection of pvo|K'rty and th,. mainten- ance o( civil rijrhiH, an,l the Imp. Stat. II (ieo. HI. cap h.i sec. .\ havinj; eniiitted in elleel that, 111 the Province of g„ehec, in all m^i/h-rxof prupn-U, awl riril n;,hh, r,s„rl sh,„d,l !„■ Iu„l /„ thelow., of < „/,,„/„ „., ti„. ,„i, ,-,, ,/,,, ,/,,,.,,,,■„„ „,• the same, ami that all .«uits respecliii" such property and civil ri^-hts .jiould I- drhrmi,,,.! a,,n',al,h, to th, ,„i,l Anc.v „„>l c.ttoms of Van- n-/./, until channel hy suh.-cpieiit h-i^lation. nnd the procee.linjr |,y injunction ,,oi havinj; been es ahhsh^l hy any siihse.pient lej:islation ..ppiK'uhle to the sa,d I'rovinie, it cam.ot he allowed as u freneral remedv in a case such as ll.l's!'c!"l'877'''"'"' '^ ^^'''"'"•'' -^ ^^- '^- '*• 48. And llie powers of a civil nature of tlie ' tonrtolKinjrsiSench, and of the jiicU.s, hereof. '!:■ IV?'*'' .•.";'""■''".""' '••■^"•I"t.d'hv the I'roviii- cmkStat..,H,eo.IIl.ca|,.(:,sec.8,a,idnoWve.-t. H in the hiiperior Court and in the jiid-es thereul, do not mclmle the power of .'rantm.' writs of injmici ion. //,. o'""ii"„ 4!h And', althoiijrh tlie prcrofjative writ of Jnandamiis, which is fienerallv used for p>,/,/w vyrpo.t'.s; un,l to rowpvl tliepn-formum; of piil,- tic,l„t„:s, has at all times, since tiii.- I'rovmce became a Hrilisl, Colony, been a legal remedy therein as an incident to tlie puhlic law of tli'e empire, yet the writ ofmaiidamiis and the writ of injunction, although they may in .some cases produce " nearly identical etiects," are not i„ principle nor generally speaking the same, and therefore Art. OL'2 of the CodeT.f Civil I'l'oce. (lure, expressly allowing the writ of mandamus 111 certain cases, cannot he consi,lered as tacitly casps."'!// '"'" "'' '"J"'"^''"" "' "'<-' ^'i"u- 60. And even if the writ of mandanms and the writ of iniunctioii ougiit to he considered as Milistantiallythesame.nevertheies.s.theulaintitf would not he entitled to a writ of injunction in leca.e de.scnhed, it not lieing one in which a «ritof mandnmus would lie, and (piite distin- S'.'S.'^C lly!"cV/i'"'' °''^""'"«""'" '•■ '•!'''« • St'c SUNDAMUS lii/ra. i>I. Anda.«it does not ftp|K'ar that a writ of m.)iinction has ever heen eiilorced m this I'n>. vince hy tinal judgment in a case siicii as the present, tjiat, however desimhh. it mav he ihat the procedure hy injiincti<,n should 'he e-lah- llslied l,y the l-egislaliire. an attem|>t to mtro- ■ liice It hy merely judi.'ial aiithurity would he lioUi dan;.'erous and illegal, fit. :)2. Petition ilir an injunction under the fol- lowing circumstances The petitionerH wciv creililorsof the Insolvent, paiticularlv liirgo,«l.s am materials which thev had ica-^on" to htdieve Iniil heen use,! in the Construction ol the shij) or vessel which was tlie sulject of the injiinc- lon. I he vessel was mortgaged to a certain Iiriii lor advances for its construction, and the pctitioiiersalleged that they had reas.m to heheve '"' ""' ^"I'l rigagees, m connivance with lie assign.e in possession, who had not heen legally elecled.and the insolvent wereahoiit to enregister the ves.-d and .lispose other in fraud olai.d to the injury of llie other credilors. Tliev flierefore asked for an or.ler to prohihit all traiisaclions concerning the said vessel. Jhl,l that under the circumstances the injunction* should l,e granted. I>ii„a,i!/ in ,;■ .[• WiirtvU, •1 (I L. U. ;i7, S. C. 1H77. i>.i. And also thai the povverH conferred upon the court liy sec. :m etseq. ofthe .MerchautH' •>lii|>piiig Act may i,e e.xerci.sed hv a jiid^e in chaiiihiM-s, and he could gnint an iiijiinc- tion prohihiting any transaction allectin.'' the vessel lor any period within his jurisdiction. It,. Ol. An injunction issued at the instance ot n contractor against the Commissioner of Puhlic \\orks of the I'rovince of Qiiehec and the bovernment engineer, to restrain them from resuming j)os,sessi.,n ol a puhlic work which the contractor was constructing, was hi'hl to liave heen imj.roperly alloweil, it apix-aring that the (.overninenl acted under express authority of file I.CMislature, and also that the terms of' the Voiiliv ferniitteil the (hnernmen. to cancel it lithe ...•: were not duly prosecuted. Jolij Ix, MnnloiHii!, 2 L. N. 2, Q. B. 1878 ; Q. .•J2 Vic ca|). 1.5. 55 'J'he resijondent was tlu- contractor with tlie (Toyerninent for the construction of the M U. iV U. Hallway. The work was to he com- pleted Ortoher, 1877. Xearlv a year later, the ine not heing yet finished, the Government de- termined to resume possession of the work. A warrant for this purpo.se was accordingly issued under tlu. Puhlic Works Act (;i2 Vic. cap. 1.5), ilirccting the Government engineer to take iwssession. The respondent claiming that a large amount was still ,hie liim,ohtaincd an in- junction to restrain the Commissioner of Puh- lic \Vorks Iron, proceeding uii.ler the warrant, ihe Commi.ssioner disregarded the injunction, and a motion was granfe.l in the 'Superior Court against the Government engineer for contempt. Ihld, in appeal, that under the cir- cumstances the injunction had improi.erlv issue.l, and all the proceedings thereon were se"t a.si, e. Vo/,/ etid. k Maalomld, I L. X. 4UI, & 2.iL. C.J. IC, y. U. 1878. IX. Skci-uitv in casks of. 56. A demand for security for co.«ts undtr the ordinary procedure is not "a waiver of defei.- ii I 376 INSOLVENCY. T. An injunction will lii- nrulrr tin- Mcr- Pliantw Slnpi.in;; Act of IH.VJ (Irni, ), sec. liri jvil 1 rt'^'unl lo a hI)1|. to l,e Iniill or ulM.i.t l„ I,' Inn I rcj;i-lfml under llie provisii.n.s „f tlie \,t ol the J'iirliarncnt of Cani.du, .'it; Vic cap V>H Q. h!"]877'""'"^ '^ "''"''"'"' '' "'•• ' ^" ''^- ^•'' INSOLVENCY. 37G IN.TUIJES YEIII5ALES— 5(v. LIBEL AND «LANDE1{. I. Damaoes fob, sec DAMAGES. INJUliY. 1. DAMAGE.S FOR, nce DAMAGES. IXXKEEI'EI{S_.<^,e HOTEL- KEEPERS. INSCrvIPTIOX-,%e PROCEDURE. INSCRIPTION EN EAUX— &e IM- PROPATlOxV. IXSOLVEXT., dLuuII^. '"' ^"'"*" iN^^-KCToa, see IXSOLVENCY. !• Action- aoaixst Assi(;nek. n. Action- kok Penai.tv uxuek. Jll. Akfihavit IX, tX'."^ '''"''■*'' *'"'''''• •fUDOMENT IN'. V. AsSKiXEE. C'ds/.K of'. Liali/e III C''V'-:nt"s Di.sciiaroe. vvi' '" ■'•'^ "^' I'Ri>''eeipin(;s iv. A\V . CllEDITOR.S not INDIVIIIIAI.LY Luui.E Km Co.sTN OF Action hy Assignee. A.\VI. Demand of Assion.ment. X\\II- Di.sciiaroe. ^^XXVIH. Dl.SCOXTINl'ANCE OF PROCEEDINGS v'^':^' DiTiEs OF Assignee. A.\X. Effect of. vvvl; '-'•''•''■•'''T "►' Filing Ci.ai.m. SY' AI'I'EAir'""'' "^' ""' '^'■'''"' ^''''■"'•'■"' vvv!!!' '■^'■''''^-''T ^f Kki'eal of Act. AAAIV . toRElON A.SSIONMEXT. A.XXV. FuAl-D UNDER ACT. vvvi^-^' ^''"^'I'^'f^^'T Preference. vvvMIr J{^■'""'''"^:<'• "ivKX iiv Insolvent. y"v\ Imi'risox.mext under Act. AXXIX. Ixsolvext Coxtixiixg Business. AL. Issue of Writ. XIJ. Jurisdiction in Matter.s of. vl'ifr ^''''^■'*''' ^'"''' TERMINATED HY. AldlJ. LiAuiLiTv OF Insolvent after Dis- CHAHIiE. XLIV. LiAHiLiTY OF Sureties OF Assignee Ai'i'ointed hv Cheditors. XLV. Meetings of Creditors. X '\r- L>F Banks, sec BANKS. ALV II. Of Fartnersiiif. XLVIII. Of Party to Ai-feal. XLIX. Pay.mext wrriiix Thirty Days. 1'. 1 ETITION AGAIX.-T In.SOLVE.VT. J.I. Petition to Quash. LII. J'oHER of Insolvent. LI II. Power op Interi.m Assignee. J-IV. Preferential Payments. LV. Privilege of Employees. LVI. Privilege of Vendor. LVII. Proof of Claims in. l'l\-^ o ^^'^'^"^THATION OF HYPOTHEC DURING. \V .■...!'J'."^''''.V^T,'"^' "■•■ '^IaRriaoe Contbact.s, .w MARRIAGE CONTRACTS. L.X. Remuxeration of Assignee. lAI. Repeal of Act. LXII. Reprise d'Instance. L.XIII. Retkansfer of E.state. L.XIV. Return of Writ. LXV. Review from Order in. LXVI. Right of Action ox Behalf of In- solvent Estate in Assignee. LXVII. Rights of Creditors. LXVin. Eights OF Hulueu op Negotiable Paper. 377 INSOLVENCY. INSOLVKNUY. ;{78 lES OP Assignee EiEHALP OF In- DP Negotiable LXIX. Rights OK Fnsoi.vkxt, LXX. KkjHT OK KkVIKW KIIOM JllKi.MKNT ox Amskixkk's Kii.i,, nee KKVIKW. I'v'^!; ''^*'''- *'-*"^' '■'■■ <-'"N":mi'iation ok. I.aXII. S.u.k ok Hook Dehis. l.XXIK. Sai.k ok Ixsui.vkxt Kstatk. De.iniiitiiiii ,if hiiniiireiihle.1. ,,,!'w,;V^- '^^:<''1''<>TV Koii Costs is. see COS is. ' I-.VXV, TllAXSKkK IIV IXSOI.VKXT. LXXVI. VuTiX(; AT Mkktix(;s, I. Aniox agaixst Assionke. 5H. Where the nssignceto nn insolvent estate, un(I.M-llie lii-olveiit Act uClHT"), sold a porliuii ol the insolvent's real estate, an, where tlie writ was conlestrd on the gn.iin.l ot the in- siilticiency of the allidavit — /A-/,/, an aiknow- ledgmeiit hy thedelendaiil of his iimhility to pay his liahillties in nin/i was iii-illlii'ient to .|ii-tily the writ, which »iis Iherell.n. liini-'hed. .Uil/"!/ A '///,// AV,.»/.v.^ r„,|..r tl,,. I„s.,lv,.,.t . V I :, .'' ""/;'" ^" ' "';• i'^"i«'-tv oc ,i„. ..H,,.,.. M. s.'r li. isi;;.""'''* ^'"'""/ -^^ '''"■^' •■* ''■ ^■' ih:!' /i'T/'y-'T' ''"''•'■ ""• '"""'vHit Act, X . i •'■'' r' "'" "'N-''-'^' '" '•■-.'.•«. tiu. "HI „l uM.lM,n/„lu,„ ..„Ml,| only Co ,,i,h,.,| I,v \I- Assignment iiv Ni)N-TiiAnKn. TXHOLVRNCV. 380 XII. Ct.AIMH in. a^si ;,„, , , " " '7""" "■'"' ""' *"""' """'•■ '"' ^,Z , MMM,„lv..,K.y, an,| j,„|.n„.„t I,uv,m« f,ri.T" I '"':;;",'"' '"^ ••'I-'''-' Imv.ni! I,..,.M t ;-,'.,.!■■. '■',"' '"■ """'*■""■'■ l"''i"""-l >l.a. . n.M.vs |,.v,..,| l,v iIh. N,l,.-//r/,/, ll,ut us ,1 wu. Ijuin i,„, ,1... ,l,.,l.,,,lan, was not' u n-u,!..,-. ," !| ftp L'r,n„.Mt «as,.|..a,ly a Iran,! an,! ll„. ,„.min„ <>l til., as-,;;,,,,,. „„^ ,|,H,„iss,.,|, M„n,,,„!, r:/ ,-ir ^ •.(;'";"■'/'"' A' (iihitn/t, 1 I.. N. 7.H, .S.'C. H.M- fl.t'.'l ',.'"" •"'"'il'l'- '■"-'■ in "l.ich a writ .,1 a ta.;li.,„.„ was si.,.,! „ut l,v a Callu.r upiinst in-s,,„, ,v|„,uas „„| ,1 ||.n,f,.r „,„| ^r..,|.:,,r lilt's w,.,o,.vi.i,.,„ly in lraM,l.,rtlK.„ll„'.r,nnli. t. .rs a,i,|_ „..,.,. ,,t «Hi,i... r,uyroH i, Vuupul, 1 L. \. ( ,, .S. C. U. 1,K78. \ il. Attacii.mknt IN. n./J.'i/'""'?'"'/"" "'-^ <■'''"'''•"• 'l"-^!'-'--!;: t,. at aciv an altachniciit iiihlcr sc,;. M „f tlic I,,- H.h ..„t Art, IsT.-,. ,|,„.s „ut ,v,|iiiiv t„ all..L'e that n,'.!. n, ""wl',',!:'''7''''' '='■'■''"'"■ ""• '"' """""It ex. 1^. t. .1. J,,,, Q. IJ. I,s7(i. Vllf. Attkstation OF Claims. 7.*^. A comiiilssujiiiT to receive affidavits to .e i.svil m tl.o .Supreme Curl ..f .I,„licalnre in J.Mf:laM|l IS an officer , July authuri/..,! i,, re.'cive tlie <,atl, ol a cmlitor to a claim to lie lil,.,| ,„ insolv..Ncy MM.Iersecs. 101 ,t lO;". of tl„. I„.s„|. vent Act, .S.5. J/,,ry,//.y tc Connolly in re IX. BlII.II|X(; AND JlliV FrXD. 79. By sec. 115 of the Insolvent Act of 1H7-) It wa.s iirovhieii that one per cent, should be payal.le l.y the ussi;r„e,.. i„ insolvency on all moneys nalize.l (,y th.,,, „n r.'al estate'in their Jiaii.ls— y/,./,/, t|„i, it „..,^ ,,,p ,j,|,^, ^|. ^1^^ assifjnee to retain that amount out of the Hr^^t payment on account of the price of sale, thoii.'h a term had leen f;iven for the halance. Clum- s"c. \m""'' ^ ^'' ^' ^^' '^ ^^ ^•^•''' ^^^' X. CaPIA.S AGAINST IXSOLVENT. 80. A caj.iiis will lie a^-ainst a person who Jias made an assignment under the In.solvent 1877 ^' "'''"""■ '''■ ^^"''^' ^'i ^- C. J. 3a, S. C. in:!.v:;v^/;x;-:Sl'^l::'■-:;:.^•':;;•■;,: ; ''H''';''-^Miip.itn....dnotl,e.p..,.!,livV tliiil he lu. nu paitiuTs, unless th. i>fu,.ul h, I'll! S r ' |,S77 """•' '" '" '^' *^'""""'- ' ^». I-" i{ exno-,m."l„'\r'"'"' ''"'"':' 1""""'" " "'""'•'"'" :^:;i:«:;'t'-:;7th;.;^;:i;;::f£;:i.:;r s;.rtrt:"';r ^"" -^""-'':'' H.I. And must he a(;comi,nnie,l |,v the ■oinhers „n which they are l,as,.,| .,,--. „,, ,' ol crc,|iio,-s, cannot p..|iti,„i „,,,i,„„ -onmnsth..n.adnpt..,l, ,.,,d/.,. p,,iti,^, , lie ili>miss..d will, ccHts. //, ■^■■^ CiLlerlheliiMdvent Act, \i<-;r,~/fcl,l ihit aclain.(aitc;i..d under. ,a,handa..c.M,,pani.;il'v '■Mehers),„c„nles„.d.muMt.esuhsta,!naiedl'v Iffxal evidence on the points rais..d. an.l if cluin,". antr,.r|uiresfu,.,|,„,.p,„.„,.„|„,,.;|. ^. -an tlio,ses,a,e,l,hen„,s,,|„„a,„,,|,,,„ ,„,.,„,;; Mdence ;;oi,e in,,,, |„,t ,i „„,,.e ,,|,,,j „,. , issue will n-t throw the .»».v Aw/ :,nVl' Q.'"l'i'."l!s78 '"■"'" ^ '^'""'*""' •* ^- '- !'■ •"'^> HI). Un.ler the Insolvent Act, 1H75-//,./,/, that n the case ol r promissory note the claim of the bearer was s.itliciemly in.licat.'d in the staemenlurnished.o the assignee by the in' el' ,^.'i'''" '" ""' "'""^' '^t' « third party, re.!!!;..A"'' '," ""'' "r, ^'"' '"■'"■''•• "■'"' ''«« ""t f.r all ,' n ■" '""' " '" "^ '^'""" '^ ■-..pre.ente,] toi all the purp,>eHof the ins.,|vency by the en- . orser wlmse name is thus given, in'tl,,; ,,|,,;e ot li.iH own, as a creditor of the insolvent, and the sif^r.ature of tie endorser to the .lee.l of en' posi ,.,„ an.l .lischarge bind.s the bearer for all legal purpo.ies. Jb. XIII. Collocation OF Claims. 91. The respondent ha.i been the cashier of a bank, and having advanced money on account 381 INSOLVKNCY. INSOLVKNCV :«2 of the bank toono I, on proinixnorv notru wliicti hf liiiiifclll.Kik II rnotlniiirc (iiprii T. U, prutcct. J. Ircciihiii« MiHolvftit, llic liiuik rill,kf.| nti the ii'ilt'H 1111,1 n'Hpon.l.'iil mnki'il on the irMirlL'ii..(.. Oil lii'iii;; ii-knl I,, ti|,. a stiilcinciit of lii« chimi, 111' lllnl tlif liulcH .,11 uliirl, h,. |in,| „|r,.a,lv rii'ikr,! Hii,| vixvnv,\ h ilivi,l.'ii,l-y/,./,/, iliut die CdlliKiitiiiii w,,m1,I he iniiiiitaiiicl Ics^ llic aiiioiiiil nreiuM l,v lli.. l„uik. Thihmtmn & liciwloi,,, .1 I,. S. Mm, y. U. IHHO. XIV. C()i,i,r.s:ox. 92. On cxiilcnccof oollnHion, writ of altiu'li- in.iit uniliT lns,,|v..,it Act, 1hT-.,,|.uisIi..,| and -H 2"';','' .u,*.y"""'" '^ ■"''"■'■•' "-^ f^'"'!/' ^ i^- ^- ;i«i, XV, CoMI'KXHATION IN MaTTKKS OP. !):i. rn.lorFon. in? of llic rnsolvcnt Act, 187.>, coiii)(('iiNatioM lUHTUi'H in re~|,fcl of ,lt.|,is falljn.r ilii.' iill.'i' tlic in-olvciic.v, wlii'ii till' trunsiictioiiH li'iiiliii;.' then ,1) iM'vaii prior to the ln«olvcncv MiiiirAc S/i„n; 2:i I.. C. .1. I.IO, S, (". 1,'^7<). " HI. Tiic a|ipcllunt wa.M a (Tcililor of tlie in- fulniit csialc rcprcHcnlcl l,v tlu' ic.-pon,lcnt as n^HjiMce The sto.-k in triuk. of ll,,. ii,H<,lv(.rit teiiiL-.'-oM, ai,|,elliint omlorscil tlic ii„i,..s of th,. Iiiiirlm-or, who lUiliiij.', appellant l,iTnnie a (Ifl.u.r ol III,. OHtatt' to ail anioiiiit fiicatcr Ihan till' (hviilfii,! ,|iii' him l,v tlif I'.^tutc. Siib-^t'- (nuiiily a|,i»'lluiit faik'il aNo, an.l r('sp,,ii,lt.|it Imviii;.', in Iii,4 i|iiality of assij;,,,.,., leccivcii a (liviilciiil on IiIh olaim a;.'ain«t appellant'.- e.'^tate soii;;|il tof^et lip theilivi.li-ihl >iiie appellant l,v the Ipiiliinee iliie from hit* e,:ellier. Giliiia.iii Vnu', ;t y. h, K. .'((a, H, C. K. 1877. XVIIf. CoMi'dsiTioN Ukkd. IIH. l{i;ihln of f'ri-,litiir.t.~\\\\vTCM\ insolvent had entered into a coniposilion of C, eeniM in the dollar, which he was to pav to the iissi^rneu 111 notes, and lliereiipon to he d'i.seli:irf.'ed aiM to receive back hisesiale, but the assi^rnee refused to deliver to petitioner the notes lor the amount ol hisdividenil, on llie};idiiiid that his elaiiii had not been llhil imiil alter the dividerd sheet had leen prepared, and bad heen hoinolo.rated bv lapseol time-y/,/,/,that tlieassi^'n;>e was wroiiJ, and was bound to liirnish him with a note cover- ing' the amount ol' his dividend. MiniiW & Slnnir/ic .\uah,irl,,'i\ L, C. J. 12,i,.S. C. 1«77. XIX. CoMl'OSITlOX XoTKS. "J!). Liahilih/ of F'i'Jnrser oh.— The endorser ot a composition not , -iven by a ilebior to bis creditor III carrying' out a settlement C,ot under the iisolvent Act) Hir (iltv cents in the dollar, was held not liable Ibr the anion, it ofsiu'h note where It appeared that the debtor lor wb.,m iie endorsed the iM,le, and Iron' whom he bii,| taken a tiansler ol his estate as collateral .seeiinl v, had secretly ^.'uen the plaint ill (a crediloi) hi's own note.s lor the balance ol Iiim claim, in order to olitain his assent to the composition, which notes hiM been paid. Ari,ln\ I 'oiilin, 22 L.C J. .!.!!, cV 1 L. N. 2'JO, Q. li. 1878. XX. Co.MI'OsniOX AND DlSCIIAIlfiK. 100 Wherelhe nameof an endorserot a note was tiled as a creditor in iii.solveiiev under the nsolvent ActoflH75, instead of the'name of the liearer, it was /(,/,/ that the enilorser would re- lirespiit the bolder, and his si^'iialiiie to a deed ol compoeitu.i, and discliar^re would hind the lioliler. Mnr/imil.s Bunk tt Sniiinon, 4 0. L. R •Uo, S. C. I,si7i^. 101. And a creditor coulil not attack the deed ol comp(jsition and discharjre after its conlirm- atioii 1' 'le knew of the iiisolvencv in time to oppose the conliimalion. Jli. 102. Under Insolvent Act, IHIH-JM,/, that tlie assi^rnee had not the rifrht to retake posses- sion ol the property of the insolvent, becau.se he has not paid the instalmentsdue uiidei his com- position deed, unless suuli a coiidilion is con- tained iii the deeti. Pitoit in ?'e,(i Q. L. R. ;i3, 103. Anil in the absence of an e.xpress stipu- lation tothat ellect, the discharge containeii in a deed ot comixisitioii is ab.-ohue, notwithstanding tlie failure (dtle insolvent to pay theam-unt of his composition. Jh. 104. And ill the case in question the deed of com|xjsitioii contained no such condition. Jb. XXI. C'OXTKSTATION OF Cl.AIMS. 105. A note given by the in.solvent to her hrother seven duy.s prior to hrr jns.^lvencv was contesteil, but as consideration was proved tiie contestation was dismissed without costs. Garon & Globensky. 3 L. N. 182, S. C. 1880. 383 INSOLVENCY. XXII. CuXTKSTATIciX OF WlilT. 107. WluTP the proof sliowcl that tlie plain, "pon wln..|, ,1,,; a„acl,i,„ cmli.or l.a/l ' ,n X' ^ « .leinan,! tor a wru was tn,.n,x..i „„ c, tlie purpose, the writ was set a«i ie /, ,/ & Amn,.^, 2 L. N. ;i8G, S. C. 187!) '' XXrn. Costs ok Ixsoi.vent's Dischaugk. CI ai.i:e roMi the court after the jap-e of a voar aske,| ,ha, the assignee be or.hM-e, ,o iL'^ll tolMmti,ecost,sofi,is,|,s..har.eM,,,ler.seo « o the iMso vent Ae, of 1,S75-//,.W, that .ec. 1 IS «asa.neM.e,| l,y 10 Vic. ca,,..tl, see. 25, the elec oiwhicl, wasto.stril,solve„t',s .lischanV, an I s lH«aMu,,,l>nenthecaM,ela«-0Mthe2,Sth r inss to, ,lischarj;e hPf;an t.eli.re this date the in s.>lvent was Motenti.le.l to costs. LoH!e\ ^";;'.^, 2 L. N. 12(i, .t 2,! L. C. J. 5G, S C INSOLVENCY. 3P4 XXIV. Costs of PitocKuDixGs IX. da!r,;. Y)^'"^ tlie i.nprisoninent of the defen- dant was (leinan.ie,! under ,sec. VM] ofthe In- lor the , elei.dant s„„pl,v, costs as in an ,'.rp„rtf l! N. 'S rn \^r'- ''"'"" '■ ^^"'^"' ' .o;!ST^«-n:T;^----xoTL,.,.,. 110. Under the Insolvent Act, 1875-//,,!,/ that an a.s,sijr„ee had no power to l,ind cr.'ditor.s personally for the costs jf an action which he hadcau.-^edtol.edi.seontiniied. He wa.s .snhject to certanihn. nations, and tor certain piirpo.ses the agent o( the estate of the in.solvent, Imt he is not tor any purpose the agent of the creditors indi- vi.lually, anil theretore cannot hind them im''" ^' ' ^ ^- ^- ^^- ^•'^' ^- ^- ^^'■ XXVI. Demaxi) of Assignment. HI. To a demand of assignment by the respondent the appellant answered that the demand was not made within three months following tlie protest of the notes upon which lie claim was founded ; that the Hank of Mon- treal had previously made a similar demand, which was still, aii.i had the etlect of estopoii,.' othe.s,and that the bills on which the rel Ln" dents were proceeding were made before the coming into force of the Insolvent Act of 1875 and therefore the proceedings in insolvency filiouid have been under the Act, 18(iy. Jwl^. niei-t (lisini.isins; answer on all these .'r.iund- >i|>pioved in appeal. Kniq/it & La ~Bann,ie NaUonale, 9 B..L 724, Q. li. 1870. ^ 112. Demand of a.ssignment by respondent upon appellant the I.'ith .Jannarv, 1875. Petit), , against the demand alleging tiiat the stoppu^o of payment was only temporary, his assets be,n„ more than snflicient to meet his liabilities, objections to the form that the demand „l' assignment was dated the 11th .January (havii,,, l;een signed m Montreal), but the allidavit w,h 'leposited in the prothonotary's olllce o1i the • ith only, date of .service of the demand ; that the demand was signed by the attorney ,„/ /"V/"^/'/ol the creditor (notarial power ofatlo,- ney produced); that the bill of e.xchange o„ winch the demand was ma.le was not duly ■ amped (h,l| on its (ace properly stamped/, th.it thedeman.l was vexatious, and u.sed onlV as a means of enforcing payment. Peiiti,,, dismis>e,l on all grounds a (irmed in ii|ipeal. Fnitfahw. W K. L. 41,-). t^ B. 1S-(I. n;i. I'lider the Insolvent Act, \m!S—][,hl tliat a demand of assignment would be set a-ide m, less It we,e distinctly proved that thedeiW,- dan had (ailed to meet bis liabilities .'enerallv XXVIl. DlSCHAIKJR. mi jiiilgment cui,- CXp. &, Jiooil'l/, 14 U here an insolvent, who was indebted o Uuhamel, Rainville & Kainville, merely put the name "Diihamel" in his list of debts without speeilying any amount— //,'Af, that lie was not ,li-.eharge,l from the claim by his 115. In an action concerning a draft which (lelendant claimed had been given as collateril security ami to induce him to sign nlainiiir.s e.oiii position and discharge, the cmrt .said it •li'l appear likely that this was the ca.se, but under the circumstances the court ought not to interfere. It plaintiff did .say, " I will see vuii paul .some day," it was a goo,) promi.se, tor'fl.e mora obligation to pay in full remaiiuM, not- withstanding the discharge in baukriiptcv. .^idgment conlirmed. Amos & Moss, S. C. I{, UG. Discharge under Insolvent Act, 187,5 contested on the ground i,i/rr nli„ that the insolvent had kept noeash book. Insolvent coi- tende.1 that the bank book answered all the piirpo.ses of one-//,./-/, that the want of a pro- perly kept cash book was snfiicient to jnsijiv the suspension of the discharge. Donm-an k Mi'Cormick, 2 L. N. ■i22, S. C. 187!). 117. A shareholder's liability to callson. stock held by him m a.loiiit Stock V.o , if not included 111 the li.st of habiliiies furnished to the a.ssi.rnee, was held not covered by a .lischarge uiide7 the Act Ui Lompannied'Asxurana- deStadanma y. Ittce, 2 L. N. 244, S. C. R. 1879. . 118. On an application Ibr ilLscharge by an insolvent who had made a yolunlary as.sh-ii- inent under the Act of 18li!)-//,/,/; ,|„it"a8 nothing ha. been done after his assignment, no meeting had been held, and his estate wouM not pay a cent on the dollar, he was not entitled to Ina, 8 t^'ki'i'o ^''''"''"' *'" '■' ^ ^''"''■'"■' ^ ^*' ^' :ncy. 3P4 385 INSOLVENCY. INSOLVENCY. 386 tiuMit In- respoiidciit Hiurv, 1H7'). Pctlli.iri 1^' iliiit, the Htdppiii-o I'iirv, liis usHfiM linrj'- MUH't his lilillilillc' iHl iIk' liomiiiiij ut' Itli .laiiuiirv (liiuiii^, I'll llic illK luvit U;lj 'an-'s ollice oli die 'I' lliedeinaiid J tlmt >y llic alliji-ncy ail ii'iiil power oCi'iliDi'. liN of oxcliariijc on iiailc was not ,||||y, properly ftainpcl)'; iims, ami used only pilVllU'Mt. I'clilioii W'i ,iii(|;;inoiit ooii- <-' exp. & Jiodiin/, t Act, 1S75-//,/,/, t woiiM l)e si'l, a-iije vc'l tliat the ileien. lialiililje lTpiu'i-hIIv I V. Tluintpsun, 21 who was liKlclited iiiville, mert'lv put Ills list ol' (Iclits, \M—Hdd, that he Ihi' claim hy his •u/idmel & I\iy,:ttf, ing a draft which !?iven as colhitcTiil to sign plaiiiiiH",s the court saiil it vas the case, hut court ou}:lit not to i', "I will see von III promise, for"llie ill remained, not- ill haiikniptcv. & Mim, S. C. K. ilvenf Act, 1ST,5, '''• iiUa that the If. Insolvent cop- answered all the lie want of a pro- iliicient to jiisiilV I'f-'c. DuiKivan k 187!). y to calls on stock 'o , if not iiicluileil 'li to the as.viiriiec, charire under the 'Hiw tie iStatlucona 1879. discharge hy an i'olunlary assii;n- ^—lldd', that a8 s assii;niiient, no estate would not lis not emit led to : Puirier, 7 H, L. 119. Under Insolvent Act, 1815— JMl. tlmt a creditor of an insolvent liad a right to oppcse the firanting of a dh-charge to the insolvent, on the ground that he liad recklesslv granted or endcirsea arconinuHlation paper, 'john.wn ^ ImJ, 2:i h. C. J. KJO, S. C. 1879. 120. A discharge from insolvency, under the Insolvent Act of 18()4, was liehl not to he inva- lidated hy the omi.ssion to state in the list of creditors that the deht sought to he recovereii was due to the creditor in her qnaliiy (,f tutrix. Q 'i'i Jvf ' ^ ^' ^' ^'^' ^ ^■' '^" ^- ■'• ^"'' 121. A claim that was not filed, and did not ap)iear among tlie insolvent's list of .lehts, was held not to be covered liy the dischari'e.and the insolvent was still liable for it. L',,,/,,/ his/ihi- Um Jor t.c AiJrniicment of Lmviinui k Simpson, 3 L. N. -H;!, S. C. I8s0. IN. XXVIlr. DiSCOVriNUANCK OF PllOCKKniXOS 122. Under the Insolvent Act, 1875-//^'/ that a writ of attaching •., insolvency, which' wa>^ not I'eturned, niu .rcated „ I ,, ,. as a niillilv, and no other creditor of oefemlant could found anv proceedingrs on it. Qtu'h,;: Bank v. Kinin iik„pp,2h.n.m,^. U. 1879. ^^ 12.i. An attachment in insolvency is for the henefitol the credilors generally, and a i)laintitf cannot discontinue at will as in an ordinary action. l'unl\.tiliort, 21 L. C. J. 198, S. C. 1877. XXIX. DUTIKS OF ASSIOXKE. 121. Under Insolvent Act, 1875-/?(.W, that he assignee to an m.solvent estate couhl not iccoinpel ed to take up the in-tance under sec. a:) of the Act. Bduir \, Lujoif, S. C. 1877. XXX. Effect of. . 125. Wherea writof compulsorv liciuidation Issues against a firm, the individual estates of the co-partners vest in the assignee as well as the co-pa,-tnership estate. Hamilton Sc L'o,/, 1 L. N. 592, S. C. 1878. ■'' 12li. W'here a writ of attachment in insol- vency issued under the Insolvent Act of 1875, the ,«ame d.ay tliat a conservatorv attachment is.iiied against the insolvent— 7/,:A/, on an onposition by tiie assignee, that the privilege of plainlitt on the goods .sought to he reveiulicated Had a|3sed, notwithslandnii.' plaintitl had ob- tained judgment on iiis attachment, and tiiat ^"''l;;'"''S'''«nt must be set aside, liohrrhonk ^"[['J' ^,/'"''' '^^ ^'- ^' •'• -tl7, S. C. 1879. 1-7. i he appointment of an assignee, under tlie ln,so vent Act, to a defendant aiiainst whom a hypothecary action was pendiifg, was held not to revoke the power of a seipiestrator ap- poinlc. .luring such hypothecary action. :! i:'n!'u)9;'s:'c''i8;o. ''""'" ''''"'"*""''"'^' 128. Where a .seizure of an immoveable was opposed on the trround that at the time the writ Issued the defendant had been divested of it bv awrit of attachment in in.solvencv, and it was Droved on contestation that the attachment in insolvenny was at one time contested and was afterwards set ashle- //,/,/, the seizure in e.xecntion was valid, and the opposition was dis- 188o' ^-'^•/'•''""■« ^ Tuv,jKon, 3 L. N. 2(1, Q. B. XXXII. E|.-FKCT OK FlI.INti C1.AI.M. 129 The fact that an in,solvent has in- cluded a claim in his list of liabilities does not prejudice his defence to such claim. Llood v. Harxaluu, 1 L. X. (|21, S. C. Is78. XXXIII. Ekkkct of Ki-;i'k.u. of thk Act. l;iO. The repeal of the Ins.dvent Act, 1875 akl.. ^V.«, 21 L. C.J. 290, S U.tsVti^^' l.it. And a, note given either bv an insolvent or by a creditor to uuiuce the payee to co, se to the insolvent's discharge ,s null. DecJ IrTl n/er k Abre & .l/ft. In an action against a trader, under tile Insolvent Act, Is"-,, f,„- obtaining g„ods on credit, knowing hi:iiself to be insolvent, two years was ordere.l unless the debt was sooner pani. Wilkes & Beaudrij, 2 L. X. 157 o . (-' . 1 8 7 1) , ' MO. An action was brought against insol- vent, under sec. V.K of Insolvent Act of 1875, alleging 2(. ditlerent purchases of ,r,,ods with intent toilelraiid, but concluding with a sii^de prayer lor the imprisonment ofdelendaiit—//,'7./ reversing the judgment of the Superior Curt' tiat It was not necessary to charge ,.,icli t)ur' chase as adjstiiict otlence. Qthlwdl k Marl',,,: L. N. (),), b. C. H. 1877. 141. And held, also, that where the court finds the eviilence insufficient to justify an order lor imprisonment, the plainlilf in "such proceeding is nevertheless entitled to judgment lor the debt if proved. Ih J '^'^nHnt 142. A merchant who purchased goods know- ing himselt lucapableofpaviiulbr them— //,/,/ guilty, and condemned to two years imprison- ment under sec. l.SC of Insolvent Act ly-y GauK k Faulrux, If) U. L. (12, S. C. 187'.) , J;!'*- l'™li"''yi*'n that on the 2nd August, 18<8,und on the (ith August of the same 3%ar defendant purchased g.iods from plaintitf, and went into an insolvency on the 2(lth of same month. Conclusion, that defendant be de- cared to have known at the time these pur- chases were made that he was in.solvent. and that lie be Impri^.oned iimler sec. l.jti of ti,e Act (1«(5>. Evidence, that defendant did not know plaintilVat all, but iiad been solicited hvan agent 10 purchase, that he had refused, and ihut the a-ent, after long solicitation, had taken down an order without his consent. 'Jhat the .'.mhIs were sent, but never put into stock or Taken possession of hy .lefendant. Demand f,.r ini- prisonnient rejected. Hhd v. Fauieiu; 2 L. Ji. 144. But, in another case, against the >^anie (lelendant, in which he had bought goo.ls on credi in .March and April, 1878. and it was est;,l,|islied that his business had shown a deficit 01 |2.;iO() in 187(i-//eA-/, ii,a,|e ,„ j,,;. prisonment under the l.'itith section of the Act Lcclaire v. Fuii/eiix, 10 H. L. 100, .S. C. 1870 ' A V^^,'V-' I"". "'"''''■«'«• l'"' "*' '111' Insolvent AC , l,H7,). Action was brought in August, 18S0 iuid the things charged against the delen.huit in he declaration are charged as having occi,ri-P,I between l)th lehruary and the 12tli April i»iii. Lnder the law, iherelbre, as it ston I ut the time of the bringing of the action, and at the time ol the acts complained of as coiisimu. iMgthe (rand, it was necessary, before tliede- leiidant could be Ibund guilty of fraud, and be imprisoned for it, that he should be alle>a,| and |)roved to have done one of live thiii'^s • ].<( IHirchusing goods on credit; 2nd, procurim- an advance III money; .Srd, procuring an indorse- ment or acceptance of negotiable paper without >''Mi-ideration;4th, inducing any person to be- ;(„.d> iiito Ktouk or taken it. Demand for itn- I V. Fiiutcux, 2 L. S. S against the f^ame id l«mi;l)t goods on 1, 187S. and it uas lesM had shown a //«/'■/, liahle tu ini- .sectioii of the Act >. lO'J, S. C. 1,S7I). id! of tlie Inxihent ill in August, 1S80, list ijif lielendantin as having occurred id tlie iL'tli April, 'fore, as a stoo.l m the action, and at led of as consiiint- 'ary, hofoi-e tliede- V of fraud, and he mid lie allejied and f live things : 1st, 2nd, procuring.' an miring an indorse- ahle paper without any per,-on to be- 5lli, oliiain.iifr hv it lur the |iaynien't iiDiiev, or f.'ir the further necessary id proved to have e things with in- 111! to have known e cause lo helieve Prigageinents, and Tliat is to sav, or acts of rraiid theni must he ac- i liy these three lid, knovvled;;e of Is lor siKdi know- ■ fact. The only irt out of the live those of piirchas- iining u term of the purchase of evcral purchase.^ they were made, mt Knew or he- meet Ills en;,M;^re. 't, and had The •//('/(/, that under isl be coiiliniied. Januarv, lH7(i, hoiit$2,j()(l, hut ered among his '7, and m Janii- ahoiit !* 10,0(10, igu.st, 187«, he 1 Septemher lie ,000, and assets in 1H7M were mi- le he was unable onnient reduced Gaiiit A Fau- re & I'auleux, ■?"' INSOLVENCY. .1 ■', '■ '^''r''"'"P'*"vintheir(leolarationaIlei'e,l tha on the 12th October last the defendant made an assignment of his estate as an ins,d- vent; thiit on the(;tli,si.x days before, he bonWit r'l"," ''""''.' "'ir-T'",'* "'"''"' 'l"i'"'itv of coals, .2 tons, or.?2o2, that the understanding was tha the defrii.iant was to pay for the coals im- mediately on delivery ; hut thomrj, begot de- livery on that day, he never paid anv of this money; that he represented to the par'tv acting for the compnny that he was ,piite able" to pavl andwouM pay immediatelv, and reierre.l to"a certain properlv that he had in .Montreal. The delendant pleaded simply the general issue, saying thai all this was untrue. The question On he Oth ol (October this indivi.lual, represent- ing himself lo be .jnite able to pav lor this coal, got delivery ol the ^roods. Six "davs after he made a voluntary assijrnment of his estate as an insohent. He made no explanation of the cir- cnnisiaiices bow such a change took place be- !"■'■'■" .'','■ ,•"', »Md the 12th as rendered it imiiossible lor him to pay what he promised lo pav ; and the court therefore Ibun.l, in the terms 01 the Insolvent Act of l^To, that the defendant knew and believed himself to be unable to meet his enjraKcmcnts when he made this i,ur- c base ami that he did conceal this fact ( ■om hepamtills, who then became his creditors tiia the amount bad not been subseouentlv paid, an. under the circumstances it was th'e agam.-t the delen.ianl, and also to order his im- prisonment. Jmlgmeut. that the defemiant be miprisoned for three months, unless he sooner pay the debt and costs. JMmcare .f- Lach,- wanm If c.s/em Radwa;/ Co. v. Heahj, S. C. in. The fact that an insolvent purchases on credit, and does not divulge to the seller the position ol Ins atlairs, is not in itself sulKoicnt Iroin wliieb to p-esunie an intention to defraud, an.l llie hope of recovering himself, which a buver ,nay have, and the lact that he purchases ha loi cash which ,e pays, and the other half at three months, will relieve him from liabilitv linder the Insolvent Act of 1875. Concai v. RenauJ, o Q. L. R. 221, S. C, II. 1879. XXXrX. I.V.SOI,VEXT CoNTIXnxo BUSINKSS. 148. On a petition by an insolvent, praving to be allowed to continue his business pendiu.- the c.nilestati,,,! of the writ-/W,/, re' ersin " the |iidgment ol lirst instance,* that the court" or a JiHge miglit permit him to .h> so on srivim' •^ecnritv lor the value of his stock in trade and INSOLVENCY. 390 XLI. Jl'RlSDICTIOX IX. „„„„,„ • , , V -•■nn III uuiie anil assets.^ .(W,-,^.o„v.(?c;n'«/.v, 1 L. N. .570, & 22 XL. I.s.sfK OF Writ. 1(0. Where a trader carries on business in oreplaces th.an one. a writof attachment under t 111 I, .-olvent Act can only issue at his chief or L.C.J. 1U7, S. C.lo77. " ^--i~', -1 •1 L.N. 566. 150. The insolvent court alone has jurisdic. loi ose asidea wnt of at.acbnient 'in i, ' ]. jency. tlr„,eut v. Ileaih, 22 L. C. .1. 54, C. C. 151 In an insolvent ca.se, under the Act, 1875 -J''J'I' lli'it the writ of garnishment is not a ■'i'«leol execution which belongs to the insolvent o..ur and,fitdi,litsjuri.,l,,,UwoiildniV ;' •.,","■ .'"'r' r'-"""*'"^" "' «">'"-tations of t"i.s ,s.„/.sv. declarations, n„r to pronounce on w's'c^r.ih:^ ' ^"""""'' ^''■' 'i Q- J^- "• XLII. I.K.VSK XOT TKKMIXATt;!) HV. 152. In oases of insolvency where no demand o( ■■esci.s.ion IS mnde the lease <:onliniies. X^ l//in, 22 L. (J. J. liU, Q. li. I877. chmIok.^' ^^'"'"■'■"' °^' I^•^o'.v^:xT aktkr Di.s- 153. llule against a guardian, insolvent, for refiisiuir to relurn his hooks to the assn-nee to Ins estate, w-ilb a d.Miiaiid lor his i,nprisonnen° rider sec, 2o Insolvent Act, 1x75-//./,/, j.a Ire mso vent, having received a conlirmat o of Ins discharge fr„m insolvency, was no b'm'er subject o the summary jiinsdieti,,,, of s.ai,u"ec. tion. .v-a//, & /.'air, ;i L. n. I»i7, S. C. 1880. Xljy. LlAltlMTY Of SlHKTIKS OK AsslGXEE wiiKx Afi-oiXTEi) bvCkeditohs. ^ 154. Where, at a meeting of creditors tmder Insolvent Act ol 1875, an official assignee, oil," than the one to whom the writ was addressed was appmnted creditors' assignee, and aft rwards ahsconded with the funds of the estate— //e/rf that his sureties were liable. Vdi.ste tt L,'/oi-l »m.r, 3 L. N. 207, S. C. 1880. XLV. MufiTixos OF Ckkditous. 155. A meeting adjonrneil at the call assignee IS adjourned .v//,c .//«, and new are necessary before meeti;:.' ai'ain ( 348, S. C. 187'J. -^ XL VII. Ok PAiiTXKusiiii', of the notices 'nn.loli- L. N. l.)0. I nder Insolvent Act, 1875— //./ Mie insolvency of a partnership invoK insolvency of the individual partners & y.'o.v.v, 10 It. L. 208, Q, [{. l!s7(j. XLVIII, Ok I'autv to Appkai,. 'I, that veil the Knight lo7. I nder Insolvent Act, 1875— //c/,? thaf an appellant .;ould not demand on the in«ol ven,.y n| the rc-pondent that hi.s assignee should take upthew.stance. or demand s-ecuritv fbr q B isf^ '"""" '^ Thompson, 23 L. C J. 95, 1 ^\ 301 INSOLVENCY. XlilX. Paymknt WITHIN- Tinuiv Days. 158, TIiP defendants received (Vdmi [). a iiay- nuMil uf morioy within liiirlv days next pret^cil "IK llie issne of ii writ of ..ilacliMicnt in inunj- vent^.v a^rainst him. Tiiev knew lliat I), had, dnrinj; the previims two nVmliis, ohiairicd iar^e advaiiceH of money from tliem on lorj;ed wan- lioiise receipts, and tliey had compelled him to take np oerlain paper lorii; hefiire MMlnrilv. In view of these liiels, and olall tlie cireunisianceN of the case as iliselosed hy tlie evith'nci — llibl, tlint tlie defendants had reason to presnnie that the linances of their dehlor were in a had con- dit'OM, and they had, therefore, jjroliahle canse for lielievin^ tluil he was unahle to meet his cnj;ai;enients in lull within the meaning' of see. l.'ft of the Insolvent Art of 1K7.'), aiidlhe pav"- inent in (piestion was eoiiseijuentlv voiil Miirji/ii/ V. iiladacuiia Bunk, 5 Ij. L. "ll, ;j21, S. (J. 1879, INSOLVENCY. LV. Phivii,e(;k ok Kmpi.ovkkh. 3,12 L, Petition against Insolvent. ISO. Petitionnnder Insolvent Act, ISfiO, see. 150, chariiini!; tjial the liankrniit Imd always failed to disclose the assets hefoii^'in;; to h'i.s estate; ihat within thirty days liefore the at- tachment he had received" moneys llir ■xWwU he liad failed to account, etc. Petition rejected, bnl wilhont costs, seeinfr llie f,'rosslv nej;li"ent way in wlucli the insolvent kept his" hook sliiid Jiiismanajied ids Imsincss, to the detriment of his cre(litors,and seeiii); also the character ol the iiiso; vent's answer to the petition, and the charj^es comained in it aixainst tiie petitioner. JJowicSi, Whytu, 7 U. L. 22«, S. C. 1S77. LI. Petition to Ql'ash. Kit). An insolvent, six inontlis afler liis insol- vency, jietitioned to have the proceedings in insolvency set aside, on liie i,'roiind that he had never heen a trailer— y/e/i;, tiiat he was too late to raise sucii a pretension. Fiillon c.v qiid/. v. Lifcbn-e & Lefelwrc, 21 L. C. J. 23, S. C. 1877. . 1(>I. Where all the a^wla of a master painter nisolvent had heen ali.^orhed hv privile.-id cie ilors, ,so that there was nolhiiru leit hut The iHiokdehts due the insolvent, and the painters I" Ins employ at the time of the insolven.;v son,i;ht to he collocated hv privilef-e on the proceeds of .siich ,\v\,ts- /Ul, ihat jonrnevniea liaii no privile;;e under the Insolvent Act,"l..S7-, tin the proceeds of the sale of hook dehts (or ijiu payment of their wa,^'es. Jiraiili,',,. & Ihnmi, .'1_L. C..I.;i()f,.fe.JU. L, .■)S(,,S. C. (i. ish'^' ■ I).). Under the Insolvent Act, 1,^75— /A/,; that a per.son employed hv the ilav had n,j privilcfre lor waj^es on the insolvent estate I ^iimMi/jii: & Gray & Stewart, 2 L. N. 302' o. L. liS7'J. ' LVI. PiuviLEGE OF Vendor. IfiO. Under sec. 82 of the Insolvent Act of '■'^'.>, the privilege of the vendor was held to cea-e from the delivery of the goods. Faiitenx A;^/;V.v/„r, 2 L, N. 132, & 2;i L. U. J, 21 1, ,S. a li;7. A misie mnscrcdtoirc had heen issued hv tlie plainlills as unpaid vendors, under whieh certain goods were seized in the hands ,,f the clelendants the very day the latter were put into insolvency. Theca.se went on to jud-ment anil the .seizure was maintained, the as-i,r. nee then lileil a tierce opposition, on the groiimi that he was duly vested with the estate of de- lendant, including ih,. j,ood» seized under the writ ol sa/yie a„iserntt„ire~I/cl't, maiiitainin.' the opposition. Jfohcrtson & Smith & FairA L, Is. 111,S. C. 1H7'J. Lll. Power of Insolvent. IGl. An assignment in insolvency does not deprive the delendant in a suit of the right to continue his defence in his own name. Miirin V. Henderson, 21 L. C. J. 8.'), S. C. 187G. LIII. Power of Interim Asskinee. 102. An interim assignee, under theInsolve;it Act of 1875, did not possess (he power of hring- iiig suit on lielialf of the insolvent estate witli- oiit jjermission of the court or judiie. hrann en qual. V. G^nercux, 2 L. N. I'ji, S.'J. 187!). LIV'^. Preferential Payments. ' 103. In an action torecover.?149.8G, as having been jiaid hy the insolvent within the thirty days next previous to his assigment — Jleld, thatit was sulhcieiit to void the payment, if, wiihi'i thirty days tliereafter, the debtor is unahle to meet his engagements to the knowdedge of the creddor, or it' the latter lias probable cause to believe sucii inabihlv. McArtliur k Midhol- land, 2 L. N. 211, tj. B. IbT'J. LVII. Proof of Clai.m in. lOS. Where a claim in insolvency was con- tested, tlie only proof of which claim was a dehtor and creditor account produced hv the plaintitf showing a balance against the insolvent— //cW in.sulhcient and claim dismi.ssed. Jhiridxun & Jiiddel &. Stanley, 3 L. N. 55, S. C, 1880. LVIII. Recistration of Hyfotiiec DrRI.NO, 100. The registration of a hvpothec within the thirty days previous to • i assignment, '.iider the Insolvent Act, 1875, is without elfect, aii.l especially when the hvpothec was grantod tw the debtor while in.solvent, to the knowled-'e ol the creiiitor re>.eiviiig such hypothec. Mc- (ratirran siun, was llcgal, and so also of the collocation Ibr |138 NCY. I.OVKKS. 392 I of a master painter rllcd !iy |)|-ivilc;,r(,|j iiolliiriir Icit Inn T|a> It, and du' paiiitiTH ■ ut' the iiisulveruiv i.v privile;;e on i|io ''/, lluit jmirnevincn Insolvent Act, '1-87"), il' Itoiik (lel)t.s (III- iiiy ficiiiiUcn ife Ihiiiiii, «(), S. (J. 1{. 1X77' t Ae(. lM-5— //,./,/^ y the day liiid nu ' insolvent estiuc. wart, 2 L. N. ;W2J DOR. e Insolvent Act of ;Midoi' was lielil to e floods. Fimtmx -.. C. J. 211,S. C. hud lieeri issned hv dors, nniler which tlie liiiiiils ,iC the e latter were put lit on tojiidLMnent, iiied. Tlie assi^r- ion, on tlie groiiiiii the estate of de- seized under tlie Ui'I'l, iiiaintainin;^ Smith ii Fair, 2 )lvency was con- ;laiin was adehtor d by the plainiilf insolvent— /A'W, ed. Jhirid.ion & S. C. 1880. Vl'OTIiEC DfniXG. hypothec within ■ I assiiriinient, is witlioiil ellect, ICC was ifrantod to the knowledge livpothec. .Vc- 3, Q. Ij. 1880. [(iXKE. d the dividend gnee, for a coni- e dislmrseiiients further siiiii for and iiis'-'vents. ^nee was only net proceeds of liirther that the tpcnses ami dis- )llllili^.-sion, was icatioii Ibr $\'iS 393 INSOLVENCY. INSOLVENCY. e" blur, for costs of ass cliarges. 'I'lie inee and insolvent's di coiiteslant, therefore, prayed that these Items he stnick out, ami that "the comiKMisation of assignee he reduced to 7A i,c WM. on the net proceeds ol' the estate, etc le assignee answered that the charges mad 1-XIIF. ItK. ■TltAXSKKU OK KsTATK. ISO ITii. I'ndcr Ins the as> Vev tin U'liee could not estate to the insol Ivent Act, lS7.-,_//p/,/_ 394 that were reasonahle ones tliat he was nameil apsignee in this matter under the Act of I and that his renin hy the | leration shoiihl li pnivisiuiis of that Act. IW C 8i;!), Je governed am of opinion that il 'uriiim. — I le remiineiation to tl assignee is to he regulated under the A m\>. It w underto(jk li liowever, nolhiVig tci s| - Act ol mler thai Act tiial the assignee stion of the estate. There is irmalion of the deed of liieeling of i;r( ., :m,s. (;. is7i). 171. Ai compelleil II vent until the con- composition liv a tors. Hnitlir tc Jii.l.hll, 2 I,;' X insolvent a i II assignee who h signed lonrths ■d of received from composition and d an oy a majnrilv m inu 111 value of th might restore to tl ;:rediiors, it iscliarge I'er and three- low a compliance will le provisions ol the Act of l8t;o. Secti says "no sum of money shall be inserte' rcinnneration to the assii'nee, mil 'I I as a tion of such remuneruti vioiisly I 111 shall have I e.ss the(iue.s. light helbre a meeting of cred leen pre- conipfteiit to deciile it." Se the therel (|iiestion of costs of d 'ction l.'iu m, ilors verns liiat a new dividend iHchar :-ge. thin sheet should li. I ofcomi insolvent his estati , it was lid'l iitilied hv a n sition ami disci large ha nei-essary to wait until || iieelingof ci-e,|iiors,aiid il I I ralilie J.rsli,' hv tl lie court. F■ I'lider Insidvent Actolis7:.— oon as a deed of composit en e.vectiled in ac //KlSE ll'lX.STA.VCI-:. lfi\1^' ^"i .''•''''"T*' ""'J'-''" "''' rii.solvent Act, mo, could not be compelled to take up the !)i.v/h«C6' ill a suit pending at the time of tl e in- solvency against the insolvents, of whose estate e was assignee yw. y. I^Ooie, 2.1 L. V f. iid, it 1 L. N. ,)27, S, C. 1878. SancHonni Ur. Avrit 1880 j«rfKilr.3'K".52EE5-S naLVlm'f,'^",''"'!''^'' '^'^ ISTSetlcsactos qui I'ampndent P U^saetos'n J.',',', I'.P"'"''?,' '"'""eh «' '"" act" ai^^^ ,«« uomposiiion oil the ground that tl ol his Col with his deed of le instalments a mutter ofliict th ipnsiiion had nntheen paid, and that as pelled to pay ihcm imi e insolvent coiiM estate. I'ilii not he Colli- ns i|e had g,,t hack I . 'i Q. I.. K. l.J, ,S. C. 1870 J-.\IV'. Iii.:rt'K.\ OK WiiiT. '"' •,?'''!■ '■'■""'" '^"y o*'" "Tit of attachment "iilorlheln.solveiit Act must not be later t a live days after service of the writ, lirurkrilll- 't^iTc. Inn''"' t5..v. i;«to-,2i l.c,j! LXV. Kkv'ikw KiiOM Order j.v. 178 Where a creditor obtained authorilv "on, the court to prn.seciite an appeal in the laiiie o. the assignee, wno refused, anii.cnto; 11 review Iron, such order was di.schar.-e,! JMp/cr it Archambault, ,J h. \. 21.!, S. C? It' J'XVr. RicHT OK Action- ov soi.VK.VT Estate i.\ Asskjxke. DEllAI.K OK Ix- 4tn„«.l.;',,i"i'!.."".'.".;i'.':;'''-;"''^-."' ■' »«' blons et efl{.t8, et T ollioiels nonimes ou agistaii •'garii de la iiiO preaeut acta u'ettt pas e.u pasa^ iiiaiiit^io et au mOine effetquo si le vv-„ . I i^'" ^'f I"«^'l^'f"t Act of 1875, action as brought to have the .sale of a sloo,, caile,! tlie iMiima, byS, L. toF. L. declare-l a iraud tlie sale lioH, .^. and F. since the time of the sale had become bankrupt-one in ls75, one in lu7hj aiid (, one ol the plaintilfs, was iheir as- signee. Ihe plamtut ly led a claim against S L 's estate. Ihe action had been dismissed unoe the only contestation there was, viz., of U., ,.|i he ground that under the llankrap;cy Acts of HOO ami 875 eacli and both of then, such an uction had to be brougiit only by the assi-.m^o ' or. 1 he i-pfiivt..) t,. I..;.. . r. •'i "'(-.[I'l , lie refused to br U authorized specially by the IJankrnpt<-v ( liie plaintiftliad never been aiithorued ing It, liy a creditor oiirt. and ■ I i 395 INSOLVENCY. INSOLVENCY. 39G wnsMuiii;.' willioiit iiiiv rcfiiinl In tlie nssi^'uPcV ri.L'lit-, 111- ihc li:iiil0. I'lidcr liiMilvciil ,\c(, 1ST.")— //fA/, ilml a crcilitor iiii.lci- $MH) is willidiii (jiiiilitv lo pcli- tioii ii;:aiiisi rcsdiiilioiis passctl al iiic't'liiif^s m' crcdilurs, (II- aiiuiiist llic a|i|ji>iiiliiu'iit (i| an as- Hiyii.c. M„};jiii, in re, .! Q. L. U. .'ITf;, S. C. 1S77. 151. Whcii' a or('(lil.>r(il.i('«lci| to ocitaiii pro- I'ci'ijiiij.'s had liv till- assi}:iK(w-//cA/, ihat as Ins claim was on notes wliicli wcivllltd he jniil no stains to ol,j,.<'t. 0„i.i„li,l„f,-.l Hiiiiky. Jhiri.l- xiiiiii. Stniilcii, 2 1>. X. .'MS, S. C. ISTi). 152. UiidtM- lns-- //,/,/, that the bidder ol negotiable paper, the maker and endorser (.f which have hoili become insolvent, iiiid who has received a diviilend Ironi one of them, cannot prove his claim agiiiii.ii the e-tate of the other Ibr the full nmount mentioned in the paper, but must deduct the anionnt of the dividend received from the esiale ol the other party. Hut if, after proof made, dividends are received Iron, the estate of aiioHier party the creditor is nevertheless enlitleil to divideml.s upon the whole amount proved, provided the diviilend does not e.\ceed 1(10 cents in the dol- lar on the balance really due. h'lwIiHU &, Luiti.f ic Mi represented the amount paid 397 INSOLVENCY l:ll OK NK(iOTIAlll,K on*15,000o( .lock, tlial il.e i.alancc «-ns ,,,,- Ii've n'l '', . l''' '"'" "i-<'-i<.-ni,i„.„?,. : n r. """•J""-^'''«~'->--//eW, lliUl ll„. a,ssi,r. . ,'""' 'l"-l^t'l< lull,,. .iiMuuni „|- $0(112 7(1, una n II,.. al,s,.„a. „ru„v a;i,.;:„ii„„ ,|,„ ^■>mCih. eHl,„,al,., ll„.asH,p,«. vn.. ,.„„1..'„„„.,| „.V,!, I'.M l)r>,rn,,li„n „/ 'ln,„i„real,l,:~\n ,i«.i,r. nt'c III lis iniiiuK.H „r M.jziut. an,! udverri'^ i.it tlie oMHs.inii was latul, an.l tl,..' ailjuciica- tmii was .l,.dai<,| v„i,l. llulUnid tc Vii,,l Fnu„!,, ;i L. N. 25U, S. C. ISWO ' " ' LXXIV. SkcLKITV KOIl CdHTS. I!»5. Where an ii,s„|vei,l cMile.-tci llie ,.„) S (^ l.sn). ihiwuud, 2 L. X. ;i2:i, l!lij. The ohligatioii uC an in,.-olv,.nt njainliir ptLiioM .i,» (II tilt' insd vi'iit Act Iw-r proc:,...,hn>:H ,„„i| 1,., r„,| ,;,,„ s„c ',„,.. ■M^"in.elo,.,.k.aliie,l wa.s 7,ol co, h . ' o X '')'>■ "• r' ''">''^ ""'"tiunc..! in Art. I07 'f le LXXV. Tkan.sfkrs by Insolvent. INSURANCE. INSPECTION LAW. 398 I. ''dXTU'VKNTKIN ok, 'I. Oil. .MK.\..<|:|iK. "I. I'lCKl.Kl) Kl.SII. '• Co.NTIt.VVKN TKl.V (iK. LXXVI. VoTuo AT Meeti.vgs. "- .1,11 under conleslaiVor Zti'^ f^''" the securities lie hehl remii . I '' ''''"' "'' I'e was held enti I t^ vo "'L: ^.rr^'r" ''^' tuu portion of his claim wl^cirwas T "' ""■ tl.e value of such securitS ii'"' '" '-'"''^^■^^ <^* ciain.danyp,^v;f:j:-;::^iiiajte^-- cntsCrS iS^^:j';!Lr^^^'^- - I. Appeal iron, ft.iu. fr,i,e,itrei„]ere,l t.v Iho .iu.lj;e 01 .Srs.-iuiis at Q„el,ec, on the -ITil, •'•""'•■"•.V. l^iX, in virtue of ^vhi.^li a „el • "■"•^ '•-Mdenined to pay a (ine ol $10 | ■ « '•;'• I'iivin,., „„ ,1,, ;.,,, .s,pu,,„|,,,,^ 1H77 II . - Iv >;u|npe,| and ol.eied .V.i' sale a Jide of u t lh,so;enre,sse,ontinC.:!7Vic.cap..|o,s,.c ^,whu.|,p,,,h,l,,,s all persons, e.xeept, I,, i,,. U. Oil. .Mkasikk. ^<]2. In an action for certain fees chiinied l'V-lu.,n>pectorofllsh ami (i,h oils, nn ie .'i' V . cap. «, sec. (is-jfe/,/, that a tier, e o -^Isu third o a pipe, „„d contains 42 lo r. f Uiiic,;est,T pllnns or wine measures. .|/r/n« I^W, 22n. L\J. 211, .t7 1i. L. 4;^C.c! li<':i And thai, the inspector had a rh'ht to a see "4 !l'"? ""'F°V'^i"n "'•:<•; Vic. cap. .17, -^ L. 4 ihai in the Inture the imperial .'allon Slot:;.^;* ''''"'^' '"-"--''^ - . ni. PicKUU) Fish. 20-). Defendant was convicted of havjn.' -old a certain ,,uant,ty of salted tish cured (br^mar- k.t to w,i, green codlish, contained in a certain ad Z ^^ '"''■'' "'''''?"' P---vious|y having .ad the same inspected.-/y,A/, that pickled 1 ere"n;..ki:'l'''' ""''V'"/"-^lHvtion a. tli'e place INSTEUME.\ TS—See DEEDS. INSUEANCE. I. Action to Kkcovkr Premiims. il. Aoai.nst Xegi.igknce OR Dishonesty. • 22 L. C.J. 284. 1., T.'i , "" '''"'"P '"' "lonbur any ,)f tlie raw litil.'s rir sii.ill ue liililo ti) a tine nut e.xcHedhiL' twenfv il,,Marl . liblVrilm 'L'i'/h""'- '" ""\»"""' s of XXIII. I'.WMKNT OK I'liK.Mir.M. XX',^' l'iiK'^<'iiii'TioN OK Claim kok. XX \'. l{|c;iiT ok Aciiox on I'oi.uv. I'/iirr of. XXVI. liiciiT OK Ix.snu-.ii.-i TO SiK inNvmi.; OK OwXKlt. XXyil Skciukd to Wikk and Ciiii.dukx. XX\'III. 'I'UAXSKIIK OK I'OI.U'V. XXIX. WlXniXd IP OK Co.MI'AXlKS. I- Action to Kecovku Piik.miims. 201!. TliejiKJgim'iit lielow (li.^iiii.'^.sod liu' ac- tion, whicii wii." looliliiiii iirciuni of proniiiuiis paid. It appeared ihal \,. liail insiircd tiio Iifi.' of a man wiio owed iiiiii a .«itin of iiioriev, but in,«(cad of limitiiis the iiinomit of in- siiraiice to wliat wa.-t owed iiini, he iii.sured for a liii'f.'e ainoiiiit, and paid consideralile siini.M fur preiniiinis, lie loniid that lie could not keep this up, and, lie.-ides, ihiit the insurance would have to be limited to the umoniit of tiie debt. 'J'here were pour jimiirn ; the oompaiiv olVered to reduce the in. l|,i|||( iijifiiii Assiirmire 7 It \,. r.7, I', v.. II' iij;ii tlii'ir II an crriir in tlio liy llie ooiiipiMiy ili'boo. Till' vil- I'l'o to iiiei't aiiil ulaiMis, uiiii tlie ■iieiit iiistriiotiiij; 'I'linj; or tlio .-I'l- iii transiiiisslon, li of dvrliue, ami I llio Nciik'iiionl. it 111' boiiiiii liy il the Hcope of Ills <'in'i)ivial Assiir- l B. 1S7"J. IV'. AiJUNt's ('i).MMIMSIilV. 210. Ap|,(|lai,(,ii, |<',.|,rna.'v, Isili), a'-ncil (,, si'i'Vc n'.-piiin|,.nlH iH niana;;..!' „(■ (|„. |,,n. ,^,„| Jiiaranl,',. l),.parl.i,..nrM „r ,|„. ,.,.»|h„i,|,.,„„- lMiMiM.'ssa(aNalai-yur *L',(l(ll) ami aroniiniMsion >'";,"l";-;'";il.oMll„. n.'l hala .arni'il „v,,. onlii'.lNl Drn'mlirror .'arl, vnir in (l„. I.il,. aii.l .imnin,.,.|nHn,an,'..|.|.pu,i, ,, ull,,- pav iMi'iil 1.1 all l">'.';.'.-aii,l..,xp,.nH,.Hil„.,-,.i,i, ||„. m,;,! atrri'i'iiii'nt („ , a(,. |,,„„ ^,,,1 ailiT tl„' (Jr.t of May. l,M,:i. wil|,aln...,hvi.||in,M,ntl,..pn.n,i..,.H ollli<' iv>poni|,.nt. Ap|H.|laiil I'lili'rnl inh, i|„. HiTvin'ol ri'spoii,!,.,,! iiM niiinai,'!'!- ii,i,|,.,' s,„.|, uuMvi'Mii'iil anil ,.,,,1(1,11,1,1 ,,.H,., i;„- (|„.n, Innii Ma.y.lM,,. „M ,,-„. Til., appi.llant (Ii,.n ''.■'• .'''■•""•'""■'," "''"'li hIhiiiI,] liavi' I n cac- ri,',lov,T, aii,| iip,,nwl,i,.|, |„. vva.s,'ii(iil,.,n,, Ins (■iininiiHNiini „r ,,,„ per ,;cnt. (mu, ll„. .'IIm D,.,. |Hti!>, wum$I2,.1(;!),(;h, an,lin li,.,i (|„. ^.''I'ul^ •■111 i;iT,.|„.,,n,M|y n,H,|,. II,,. „,., l,„|Hn,:,. $7,lr'.| IM liv t I'llmiliM- ll„.|Tln,i,i ,.,,.r„iin |„ss,.s, ,.|,. . l/rl^ voii are irmlv to acci'pt tliesanu' IransCcr toVou all (I,,, m'sn,'. nnoewluol, I li.,l,i (br tl„. Iicni'di of t|,<. luis,- ciim) crclilons of Ilic (.^lat,., n„t inclii,li,i.' claiMiH lor I avioV ((lu' (.-.insfcror) ilebis oiu? siilc of 111,., (rias.s liiiHincs.s. It vim.H he pn-fWl- • ill pn,rn-/,,n,lt/,at fhr inmnu„-r in oJs/i„n /.v J>-a„sn-n;tJur llw hnu'lil nf th.'„n.,;;u;,l ir,;h/„r.i, awl more cspeviuU;/ for (h, hvnHU uf (iiamen oinilti',!). J niHl, it'to be ,li8tin,.||v iinikTHtoo,! that 1 ,1,. not inti'inl, nor iviH 'l consent, that any part or porli,jn of the insnr- ance thiiH to he tnin-ferri'd Kliall he laUen a- ^vcriiiK or in any way whatever He,,-iirinc- Mo hson.s claim or certain pretemleil morl-a.',^ ami odier claim.s of Mnlhullami & lial^.r __ nor those of certain workmen I'lainiiii" wa.'es' etc. Jhv ahure exprv^H r.oiii>>f iiwIvrMoodand wjrevd to, t wiUtnin.s- Jer the lu.sunmre in ,jne.stion to yo.i us of/ici,d {Clarke 'i,id sli/.nlollon.^ ,d.ore srt/nrti, nulhoul e.nr,,,ion." Th,' poli.v of ^^i.n.iic,' w.i« not nniil,,' on account oli)av,.,H, ' , '"" '"■ "">• inlen'Ht in it. Nor wa. th,.,'.: I. conH„|..ra„„„ j,,v,.n l,y ,|„. plaintKfto ,|,o a 1^ lie,' lor the aHH,Knn„nl „f the policy to Inm ,7."''""^.' ■'•I.v a«ifl //,./,/, ,|iat ihi. was '"' " "-"«' "' in inN„lv,'n,'v i;,r th, n,'ntl i'. "" "'! '!"■ ''I'll- of a .■oniiition of ,1,,' h.v vyl„..|,-t,p„lat.,ltliat'.|ncaH,'iliepoli,'v ^^"1 ily, when h-.s or ,laniaj.'e arisen, it «|,all l,e ;;;';'">■ "' H-e assi;,,,,,. ,„ n,al■ "'« «<^"'P''"y of tlie lienelit of the coniiition. Jh. 2 7. J'his wa.s an aiuion on a policy of insur- ance hearing ,iate at Ilartfoni, Con.i. ft, was a ix-licy 0,1 the ife of M., in favor of K. M., and pi.r,M,rted to he in consiile,ation of a su.'n of we' , .'l "; .?''' ''."'^ '"*''^' "'"' "'« co,„lit,o,m , ?,l V " ''"'"'-^ "■"'^^" '«come line three i.M ths alter notice to the company of the ileath H, I'ef, 1 ."" ^':"'«,"i"'J<' '""ii'i- the policy, lefeniiantM re.sisteil paynu'nt on the ground at h. .M. never paid them any mo,iey at all ; i he o il!'e "!■',;"■'""•''''' I"-'- '"•""'«-•. ^vho sent .TP,H,t„ ^'"' '^^•"l^a'i.v "'"1 succeedci in itho ,T li""'"''*^"'^' '° """ '■"'^« 0' "'e company, t e Dla n Ir f""""" ^''/'^ P"i'l-//'/'/ that tl»e plamtill, however, had proved enough to i ' I ( "M > n ■ i, ' i 4 ".. a\ n •J •1 ih^ 11 4();t INSUaANCK. INSFKANCR. Khow api-arciitlv ii ri>.'lil oC .iction. HmI tlirrc wiiHalHiul ,U'iW.t i„ tl,,. ,.,iHf. Tlicrc wim im> no! i.;r 1111,1 pr(,„l,,f|lu. (leiitl, ,,C (hr insuml um r«'(iiiir<',i hv the >'<>ii,liiic>iiN „|' |||,> nolii'v— no- tlnn^'Ii. hIi„w tliul lli<. liiM,. lor pavnicilt lia1, tailed hy some inadvertence to jiive tlie re- qiL.'ed notice ol an insurance ellected .^■■.hs[>- qiienliy in the Commercial Union Insurance Co. —-Ililil, that he could not recover on the policy. Bennsoleil ic Canmlian Mntiial F''-e Insurance Vu., 1 L. N. 4, i^. B. 1877. ' I ...I. A condition in a pohi.yof a Mutual [I'ire Insurance Co. provi,!,.! that" in case aiiv iin^ iiiiHHory note f,,r thelirsi payment on any dc posit note should remain unpaid thr thirty "days alter It was ,|iie, the |K.licy should he yoi,'| a- 't„ clainiH occiirrin,,' heU.re payment — //,/,/, that the company m acceptin;.' a note for such (ii,t pavment, hut acknowle.lL'iiij,' receipt hy the policy as lor cash pal.j, waived the comlitjon J/,m,' y, llurl„Uui„ Mnlml In.vinnirr C, , { l-N.;!:W.A-22L. C..I I'.'l.S, C, IH7S. ' 222, A person cU'ecteil nn insurance ui;nin"t lii'c lorone month, the insurance heinj,' suhict I" II, e lire insurance policies .d the company lie aske,| lor n ptilicy, hut was t. Where ft tire pi.liev liud l.oon emlorfled loiiiKillier ((ir advaiiees, who win iiccpicl l.y rheeoinpiitiv — //,7,/, thai a (;.>n(hliui, ihul M.,ti.;. anil proot shoiiM he «iveii hv the iriHiire,! wan HBtiMtieil hy notice aiel pn'.of ^\u^l^ hv the n\,T'; .;':''""'"" V. //"in,' Fir.' tnsHntnrr «,.. Tit,. Ihe iiiHiire.l cannot recover upon a jNiliey which contains a condition inakiiii; the cnntiact void If the pivinineM lie left unoccupied for more than lilleen davH wilhoni notice to the conipiinvMuid It appears that the pieniiseH were vacant at tlie time ol the tire, and had heen so torn tniicli lonir,.,. ||„|,. iiimi lifleendavs withoiil notice. Cinllnat \. Duniiiiioii Fir,' & .\f,ini,e In-suninrr (•„., ;[ |,. y. lu;-;^ s. C. ISSO. ^27. Action to rec.iver tiie amount of a (Ire l'"'."'.V "I'd the defcndantH Ihmih' a miiliial society pleaded the statute which voids an in- miraiice contract where there has heen another liisiirance ellei'tcd without tiieir consent ; and also a special condition of tli<' policv (>.' ,. ■,) to the same elh-ct. This was tlie principal point 111 thi' case. /Vr Cirium : A varietv otcirciim- Hlances were adverlcl to temjin^; to show a knowled)j;e hy the deli'iidants of the existence ol another contract. That, however, ,h,us not ap- pear to hie, under aiiv reasonahle view of the law, to he enoiij-h. There must he a con.sent. Jlie wonis ol the statute are: "Unless the (loiilie insurance suhsistH with the con.sent ■"<■'■ •'/"'""' hmirana: C,,., A I-. .\. .1,11,, .Sii. Cl. l.S.SI). \\. V'UiK. 'i2'.KMI.v;/,rr.,ri,l,i/i,„i.~']\, an action on a nre poocy tl,e c(,nipaiiy pleaded misde.scrii.li,Hi ;'';; I'lyach of condMio.i. The apphcatioil ,h.s. uiH, the house .IS "isolated.- winch term in H loot noie iinderiiM„i|| il,,. signature was ex- Uiid.i.-.s //,./,/, ,..v..r.i„.,i„.j,„,.„„,„j „,.;,,;, ■^iiperior ( oiiri, tha: the applica^il was not '"""".l ''.V .-nch a clause, and there hcin.r „„ "'"'I lliat the application was in had failh he ^wis eniiiled to recover. /•,/,■„,(,/ .t '/'//,- (/urm -•-It. .\or was there uny misreprcsmialioi, in "ii'la.;t that the applicant had overvalued the property, no had failh hcing shown. II, 2.!l. Action for iiiMuanc.. iindrr a policy in- suring I he stock and lixin res in |,lai mi Ifs saloon lothe extent of .^ImO. Ai.er the Mre plaintiif swore to the amount ol his loss in the sin,, of *•>•..). aiidchrmed the 0:11 amount of the in-ur- Hiicc. ihe .piestion ,,f value was siihniilted "itl.out prejudice on either side to arhitralors who valunl tl,e loss at $2:U.7,V I'laintilf liroiigl..tac'ion l.,r S.iDI. oil-//,,/,/, that on the (■yidecce nlaintiir's lirsi claim wns •Coiitlrmed in Iteview. See 4 h. N. 2a5. on ,', : ' > ' 111'-' grossly ex- aggerated, hcingmore than douhle the aiiionnt snhscpiently ascertained hy the arhitrators, and iiat there hv the plainliir u„,h.,. |,i.s p,,!,,.,. |„^,, lorleiled a I claim to indemiiily. A,/,,,,.,},,, v. ///'■ iKiijal Immnince (J,,., 2\\ L. C. .1. 217, S. (J. 2;i2. And h,hl, also, that the reference to arliitration di,i not constitute a waiver on the part o( the company of the ■joiidition ..f lorlei- tiire. ill. . 2;i:!. N„tl,.,. ,,/• Aav.v.— When, in a policy of insurance against accidents hy ii,.e, a ,!,„„|i"ti,, , isiiiserte, tothe ellect that the proofs of the ire shouM he .sent in within ihiny days, the tliir ty days are a material part of the condithm, so that, unless there is a waiver, the assuved cannot recover unless he sends in the nroiM-r prools withm thirty days. Wlmt,. i '/•/„, rif'wi *'■""■"'"■" ''"■''' '^- '^- '""' ''• <- ^^"^'■ i.^i. Where an insurance company set up in answer loan action on a fire polijy that the assured had not given notice of loss wii„in the delay required hy the p„\Wv-J/e/,l, that as the ciai.pany, when it refuse.i to pay, did not ohiect to the inlormalities in the notice, it had wai'ved Its right to olitain any other or hetter one Q. f^;I{;;i.i7, .S. C. U. 1,S77. 2:i,j. Toan action for insurance the company pleaded irregularities in the notices and p:-e- liminary proofs of loss— y/e/r/, that as the c,„i,. liany had joined in an arhitration with know- ledge ol all the (hcis, it i,ad waived the n-hi to titiject, and couhi not raise the point afterwards. Cawi, mn Vnin,,/ Fire Inmrance Co. & Duno- vauy 2 L. N. 229, Q. U. 187U. ■"fi A 111 4ilt msURANCK. IN.STJRA^\CM«:. 408 l.lli. UIuTi'illi iii«iini!ifc (■(.nii«inv iii/n- ii/io |ilrftilnl wniit niMiflirimi fioticc Ur/,/, iliiir u,-. Kill..' (llcdclftV lllXl .■X|,l|l.;|, (lll'i|,.|i.||,|ll|,t., |||„|' "J-Tci'il ii) Hiiliiiiit the cliiiiii (.r llic iiisiircl |,, "'■'"''"'"■ < I'liiiv tor ii.liii.Hifiicnl, ilirv liiid Wilnr.l llirir ri^'lit Id t^>lM|>lllill .iC llic "iLOjiv. •Hh. C.I. (;:.. ^^• n. ih;ii. "* 'J.'IT. U'licr-f a i;.iiii|iiiriv received the inronim- tloii ;.'iveii liv the iiiHiired witlitml ..l.je.Miori, imd lllleraiiid.t liiniishrd liiiii willi ii |'.iiriled Inilii in wliieli (,. in;il<,> h^ claim— /A/,/, (|ml tlx'V liiid vMiived their n^'hl loplcid iviuil ,,r i,nlic..' A'//// V. Ilnrhrl,;,,, MnliKit hiir l,i.>-iir,wiii«tn|heirhaMii;:licii;^' hiuiil, the CiiiiditKiii ,i|' the |inhcv rei|iiiriiiu niich «liile- n.eiil will he .-iili<||ed l,v utlidBvil.- a^. tu the value III III,. |,r,,|,crly l,i-(, /Wn/ v. Xi,„/an, JfLilrir/ Htr liimniiicv ('<,., 21 1^. ('. ,1. '2,')7, 2.'lll. Viiihilii.i, of l'i,/in/.~Act'uiu (ill a lire liolic.v ellcccd wilh the appellaiil-, in Isdj. 1 lie iiiMiruiice was de-crilicd as heiii;; ii|m„i ceitniii ;:,.(,ds, " whetlier their own |in.|ieitv, lielil on trust or on eonsij.'nincnt," contained in the lia-emcnl and third slorev ol'a iinii.He known fti the W'c-iern ('hamhers, ocenpieil hv the iisiMivd as a hondcd and ).'eiieral warehoii-e, St. dolih sireel, Monireal, and was lor llieMim of !t-l.',(iOI). 'I'hecondili.ns of the policy |irovi,led thai floods nil .il„i;i,'. must he scparatelv ami f-pecilically insiireii.and also, as is not ninisual 111 snch case.-, thai notice shoiild he jriveii to the insurance coiii|ianv of ftnv previoiislv exist- in.;: policies, and that such should he endorsed on the pidicy in (piestioii or aLl c.intaiiic.l in the thin! storey of the hiiil.lm.' were t.ita ly dcslrove.l, whilst thejro.ds covered hy the |K. icy in the . :'itr ixirti.indf the hiiil.l. inj; were .laiiiu;:e.i, hut not .lestroycil. J{et\vee„ the .lute ol the policy un.l the .icciirrence of tl , hre, certain chanj.'es took place which cau.se.l all the suh,se.|ueiit litigation. The a.ssiire.i liaviiii; iKJcasLin t.irai.sea sum of money ple.l.'c.i ihe f.'.M)ilsin.jiiesti,)n as ollateral seciiVitv, that IS. l.io.se contained ill the upptr jmrtion'of tjie imil. iiijr. In order to that end.uiulso as not to cliHi,;:o the actual pos.session of the jr.. i.ls, a 1.!. n'lml lea.seof tlie iireiiiises was ina.le .o one >-■., wall a view of making him a warehouse- man, iij)on whose receipt the mxxlfl could he dealt with The .ilace ^yllere the goo.ls ,yere storeit bei, _, a honiIe.| wareiiouse, one key was .iehvered to H. and the other lieM hy the locker ol the cii-toms. The only a|)proach t,- the b.jii. e,i store was throu-:h the premises ocRiii.icl by tlic rc.=p,_,„.lciii.s-/A/,/, reversing the iml.r. uient ot the Superior Court* and contirmiifi; that ot the Qiieeti'H Ilene.h, thai the h^ase to ({ .li.j not voi.l the |Mj|iev,un.l that the ii.in.JiHl eloHiire ol u previoiiM jKilhty can he waive.l hy '•'"""I"'' ■• -n.! mx'iiial .•in; stan.^.'s. I,„ii ras/iiri' lii-iiirunve Vu. it V/iiijminii, 7 1{. J,. 17 I . ' . . I H ( ,», * :U{). H'lnrrr nf <^imiUliuii^.—t\ .•ou.iiti.m in a |i..li.;y ol iiiMiran.a' 1.. the ellict that all peis„„,, in-nre.l shall, as so, .11 aft.T a tire as ikh^iI,),,' ' ehver in a particular acoiint of their l..-s „l- 'hinia>;e,Hi;;iic,| wiih their own lian.l an I ve. Ile.l hy ..ath or allirinati.in, is waivcl |e ||„. iH.ttot tli.'a;;ent ol (lie company ai„|ihe tier son insure,! each . Iioc.sin;,' yaliia!' rs who n.'ik • i\ valuali.,n .,f the loss.an.l h* ll,e \\^* „,■ t| , '■"lupuny ollWin- the cmpany a I-hs amount I niii the valuiilioii 111 s..M|..iiie!,', ,i|., ,, „;; that Ihey .iiily .lisnute.j the 1, mount t.) he pai.l (..mm;,' y. '//„ /'rorinri.,' lii.„in,i,ec (}„. ,} (-iiiiiiilii, 21 I,. ('. J. 2V(i, S. c. II. 1877. X. l.N.siii.Mii.K [ntkhkst. .11. Action hy the a|ip(llant a;;ainwt the rcsp.,nde,iN („.■ ^2,r,',->, heiii- the am..uiit of a pr.;mi-.-.ory n,,tc hy T. H. t,i ,,r,ler of app.dlant end.,r>e.|l,y W. M.JtC... This n..le wa's .1.21 .. h ;\|,nl, |S(;7, aii.l payahle tour months alter H;ile. I he ap|Kdlant all..;,'e,i that ah.mt imh ,j|' I eeen.h..r, Isiiil, one II., a hroker, or ....nie "Ihcr person actii,.; thniu-h him, owiie.l and l....sse,-s,..| 1 ,0(10 barrels of reline.l coal .lil, whi.-h were in M.'s wareh.iu.seM, that is, 700 ii- ware- liouse No 1 an.) 200 in warehouse No. 2, lop wliich .\I. ijelivereii wareh.ui.se receipts to K nn.ler the aiitli,)ritv of the owners; that on 2(ltli Decemher, l.stjti, !{. assi-ne.l to apjiellant the wareh..iise receipts aii.l the ..il they repiv.sente,! ly eii,|,jrsin;; tiiem ; that on the ;)Oth ,,f Vpril lf«'7, appellant re-transferre,| to |{. iJOO harrelH lien stiu-e,l in ..;aid narehoiise, with the undei- HlHii.iiiii; that iip.in K. paviiij: on the 2i„i of hepiemher, IS(;7, his note .'.f *2,,'')00, he w,,iil,i re-convey t.) |{. the reniainint; oOO harrels of oil, whereupon he surren.lere,! the two receipts or the 1,000 harrels, an,l receive.! hack a ware- iH.u.s:. receipt ma,le hy M. in the name of tlic "I'l'i'llant. Appellant ,)n 1st May insure,! with respo,i.!eiit« these r.OO harrels lor a period uf lour munllis,f,,r ft, 0(10, j„ warehouses N,,-, 1 iMid 2; On 18th Auj,'iisl, !8(;7, the st,.re X,). 1 • H.-, ,e.st'-,ye,l by tire, :iii,l iheoi! ..iisinned wiK.,v.,M,„:, he claiiiie,. -h, insurance to the' ^-M-'nt 01 ho noteof tiie principal an,l interest " ■■ 8 note. Responilents jileailed Jl. wm never tlie owner of tlie oil-that tlie oil was never store,! hy 1{. or anyone cl.se .'ivin- 1{ or appellant control therof, and that it'was imt there when tiie store Xo. 1 was burned. -;.",'• ".litt si'ppusinj; M. &Co. were the owners ol the oil, uii.ier ch. 2 of 2Uh Vict, tliey ,;ould only f,'ive a warehouse receipt that woiiM he a < ociimentol title in the lian,is of R. by makin.' It 111 Ins own lavor, an,i in,lursing it to the second liolder. ."Jr,!. Tiiat at the time of etfect- inir the iii.siirance, appellant represented the oil to lie in No. 1 ami No. , ami never notified respoii.lent,s of the inerea.se.i ri.sk iiv its removal into ,\o. 1 The court below dismissed tlie action on the ground thai R. had no oil of the • I Dig. p. 069, Art. 886. CK. 408 Ihllt lIlC ll'dMC III U_ il tliivt llic Hull i|ii,J ' I'lin lie WHivi'd liy oiiinsiuiiccH. /,,in_ ii}iiiiiui, 7 li, J,. 17^ . — A rdiiiliiiiiii ill a i(;t llml itll iiciHuiis u tire uM |„igsi(,|,.^ lilt 111' tlu'ir losrt iir iwii liiiiiil nil, I vci|. in waiviil liv 1 1,,, iiitiiv ui.il 'lit' |ier. Illll^ I'M, \v\h) II, 111,,, \<\ (lie t'lot iif tli(. Jiiv H N-Hs liimiiiiit llflll, mI.i \, ll^f tliiit iimiit Id 1)0 iMijil. liif!\iniiici>. (!„, „/• ;. II. I.S77. -^ Hunt ii;»ainHt the : llio uiiHiiiiit of u mlcr of ii|ip('l|iiiii, iIh Hole wim (jutcij t . ;isiiiiit'(j, iHiiraiice td the ijiiil ami iiilt'i'i'.^t ili'uded J{. wa.s hat tilt' oil was ci.se "ivini; 1{, and that it was . 1 vva.s liiinii'd. wore theovvnors /iot. thev Cduld hat woiilil he a )r li. l)^ making ruing It to the e time ofetFect- rpprwented the li never notified ; iiv its removal dwniisaed the ad no oil of the 409 IN T'RANCK. INSUUANCK. 410 Vicloria liraiHJ i.i dtoro Nn. I Hvhl, .ll^ti,,. KiiiHliiiii.'|iniii ir, 'wit Sc Citizfii't I., slim III-,' (%,.• and 'oMllniiiiicih.' jiiil^iiiPi.torihcc'iiit hcluw, til III il wa« pi-dvcl appcllaiii never liiui any oil there, Imi that on the cdiiiiinv it wan prl.ved that there was no „i| ihrre ; Ih.. deM!ripli.,ii liienlidneil ill (he warelmiiHi' reeeipi, either at the tune the insurance na-i ellrrird or al llie lime Ihe (ire dceiirivd. //<»/,/& WcHttru Ansiir- aiirr Cii., ii. I(. 1M77. 2i2. A pdliev dl life iiiHiiraiiitp wan mmje out III the name df (i., win. never paid a pre- tiimm. The a;,'ent dl' ihi' cdinpanv retained (he [Milicy in hi- dwn hand-, and Hiil"wei|iieii|lv iMdiiei'd L., wild had lid iiilere-l whatever in (j. ^ life, td take an a.'JHi;;iiiii|.|i| ,,1' Ihe puliey |,v way df Hpeeiilatidii, and h. then pai'l thepre- miiiniM //,/,/, that aw L. had in. interest, and iw the traii-arliiiii was really an insiiranee liy L. ol ''-'n lili' fur hi-i dwii henelil, thai iidaeliiiii ciiMid he maiiilalned dii the puliev. f I'rzinii A: jV'/r )'"/■/.■ A//;,. Jii.Huninrc Co.' .1 L. N. :)22, y. II. 1KK(|. XI. IXTKKI.M Ktil'Kll-r, 21.'!. In an aetion fur an in.-iiranep premium to whioh payment had be.'ii plemled— //./,/, that Ihe fi,ni. known nn an inlerim receipt did iidl esialilish tiaymenl. Canwliiin Firr In. suniiin- (,'„. y. Ki'i-i,(irk, 2 L. N. 272, 8. C. 187!). XII. ■IllllHlllcl |o.\ IM C.V.SKS OK. ^11. 'I he riL'ht oCai'tiuii on a (ire insurance JHiliey is where the pniporly \a and where Ihe ftp|iliv.alidii wa.s taken, and iiol where II (lii-e ollheeiimpany Ih. Ti>iiri;iii>/ v. Othiwn Ai/iintl- iimil liisuniiur O,., ;f L. N. I'.lli, Q. li. ls,-(0. XIII. Law wiiicji (Jovkhns. 215. I'laiiiiili', a widow, «ned defen'lant, as trii.-tee df (lii. iiisdlveni Hiicei.-.'^idn df her laie hii^liaiid, and the i.ther defendant, the .Sun MnlMal Life Insiuunce (^ paiiy, lo annul the translerdfa pnliey m $2.(M)0 on" her huHl.aiid's lite, whieh nlie had Iransferred liefore his death lor the lienrlitdf his ereditdi's, and a-kiiii,' that the money lie paid dver to her. The suit was liroii-lil in M.intreal, where delendant resided. Ueleiidant tliereiipon inslitnled proueedings in tlieCdiiit of Chancery, Onlarid, id enjoin the insurance coinpany fiMih paying the amiiiint to plaiiilid. Tiic iiiHiuance company in lurn prayed that the other defendant he eiijuined to ' desi-t Irdin Ins prdceedings heloro the Court of Uiaiicery-//r/,/, that the court had no juris- diction. Tlu' Act Q.41 Vic. cap. U limiled tlieiv-iieol injunctions to the cases speciallv riieiitidiied therein. I'aieiit v. S/iairer, 2 L N' 125. A-2;i I.. C. ,1.42, S. C. I,s71). 2M>. lldil, also, that the c.r^aiice reHiiltiii" Ironi the insurance was a iiinililf iiwor/xirfl, and wliether it were Cdii.sidered Ihe prdperlv of the wile or of the .-ucco.sion of the hushaii governed l.y the law of Ontario, and woul.. more projierly discusHed in the Court of Chan- cery oftliat i'rdvitice, lb. * rule r. DiR. |i. ft->(i, Art. .'IGO. t Eeversed iu Supreme Court, but not reported. Ed. XIV. Li.uiii.irv (IK Co!iif.»NV KOH Acts or 217. IMiiiiiliil'demKiidiHl fn,,,, i|„. del'-niiiintu 'hlivir; of a policy of 'MMiiriuiee III III,. UMiul lorm. in perhirmanee of an ftjjreemeni i,,r an u.- siiranee previoii.ly nia'le, TI,,. dcfen ia»it« pleaded that they lii.d iml In-,,, fMh\ li,.. p?,.. iniom of iiiHiirance. aiel that there was i.o c.ii- liiul will, iIh plainlill. Ity the court ; The jilaiiitiirwas .iroughl to the defendanis" otHeo hy a canva,-s,.r for insurance Iiii-iimhs df the niimedf I.. The deli'ii'lanls agreed ii-iirancu. I he interim rec<'ipl was prepared and sigm- ( hy Ihe Cdiiipaiiy, anl they dcliyered il iTi I i,, '■"II"'' 'I"' » int ami hand over ihe receip, [he iiarly eniitlid, who was in ih^H ii,,iaiic> huildiiig Hdciely which had lent in I'lainliti; L, colh'cled the money ai i the rei;eipt to flic hilildi Court: \Vi i.y toU •liveri-. ing Mociel Hy the as ifu. payment to L. a payment lo the .)inp,iny? The coiiipanv say L, wiiH nol ,ur agent, lint the agent of thu plaintill, II I until he had (laid the money over Id IIH we « re Udt l.diind. Tlie plaiiiiiir,'dii (ho ilher haiMl savH thai the Cdinpany in deiiver- mg Ihe iiitci III receipt td L. and telling liim to '".lilt-' '''•'" money, have ina.le him nm /„„• i'".v; their ag' .1. The court thinkM so, toi,, and the onler wil m, as the i.lainlill pravs. Jhwat & SiiiHiern A ■i.u'miri: On.. .S. C. I,S77 2|H. Action aiice on a pron. leiidantH pleaii. property, the al clerk without th. kncwledge of me c. inpany and without any .iillmrity to do ho, and that coiii|)any n, .or received the iiremiiinj. that if he company cdiild he con- loiind hy iie receipt.'the plainlill had not conldrmed to tue conditions of iii.siiram;e as to notice, proof ol hi.s.s, etc. Jt appeaiiil that the pivjiorly wa« I nil he fore any policy had hat the company in'iist he 1 re.sponsihle (iir the act of their (•mpldyoe, •>r thejireiiiium, and judg- phiintitrH favor for $H00, ■inl lnHurunce Co., 8. C. recover the amount ■'y at the Tanneries. that they never in I iiiHur- The do- 'led the ■ged receipt heiiig gi\ i, hy a ■ the c. the Furl her, Hidered heen issued — llilil. hel who gave the rece' iiient would g., in ,|,, /'"/■*; V, Scottish Imii' XV. LiAiiii.iTV 01 CcvpAxv TO Rkpay A.MOI-NT.S l-AID FOB St \M1'.S INUKR Q. 3;o to Li,;;lan( , where tlu" liei.l tZ'^ur'"^ ''"' ^'"-.nount-Z/J/';, t ' i'>\. hiHiiralilc Infcre.s/.~\ ore, I i or olif. in . iJotli the creilitor and the a.^ent of the : nr ance con.pany were i^norant^ that .eh ex ra "fia entitle.l to reeovor the excess of nreniiuin Kit;tir'''\"'''''f"''''''''''''''-t-" INSURANCE. 412 s'lnil^.;!". " '"'^""I'le."' action arising out of tl,e S-rSr,'t:'s:t"i"',;?i'. "■■""■5- XVIII. Ml.SRKPIlE.SEXTAT10\. that the preniinni for 'the sinailer su,',',' w^'\„-o- po t,o,,a „, that pai.i for the larger sum. El 252. J?/;;/,i of ]i,i,i,.,. „^ r;,i! s, creditor ,?eL . ' '"' "' '"•" »"" e-''"""'fon a cargo °1 ■ 1 1 ,\'""''-'''"'' <"'' '''■''■"'l'">ts ple«,led pe,i!:nd;::td^)^,-— s:^,dS;;:s-i:! vess^ei" .n\"!'"" ■". f^'^o^er $1,000, insurance on a Mont e 'T'""" ''''' "" '' " '>-''-" '■'•'^■" -^Ii""""> 'o 31ontieal. I he insurance was elieded at Min-an after whch It proceeded to Cow Ba\', where it CowKl ^'"''r^'T "'■'^'^'^'- After leaving tovvlJayit was lound to he .sinking, an,l was obliged to ,,ut mto Sydney for repairsT Shor v alter leaving Sydney, however, it again spru,,.' a leak and was ahandoned-7/,./,;, that the nr- emetel f .^Y '*'''*"• "■'"''•'■ "'« in-^nrance was L. N. 124, Q. B. 1880. -i^'^"'««^-« tW.. 3 257. Where, hy the terms of a policy of in Mmnce, the stateinentsand represel^^at'on.? co ] ■inied 111 the aiiphcatiou for ti,e policy a- made part of the contract, and hv the policy all .sue sta.emenfs and .■ep^.sen.atio,7ar^ y ' 1 anted to he true, and the application contains . Ise representations and fraudulent snp e smso he know edgeoftlie insured, auE "111 lie to have the policy cancHlled and de 'vered up and that without return of t e nit nnuins paid. AV«. Vor/c Life Lisuranc ci [■ 2,,8. And /„./,/, also, that in the case in qiie~- "n the party a-siired was l„,t a ,nrh: non}x\l^, l;'",;:''t^''»'"'^o'''l-.leli4dantno,'l S lie lan a wager or speculative p.licy, and hat tlie assignment of il to defe, dant con 1 2.)1». 'Ihe action was to recover $2 141 1 1; conHiensation for lo.ss by fire to huildiiigs i ,' "Inch insolvent St. ,f. was interested as c7vd or o the projirietor, H. U. Tlie action 1 s m the name o| the assignee of the in.solvent 1 .e plea alleged false representation a 1 conceahnenl of a material fact, namely t la . le "■'".?' ""? '""''^I'the insurance heiie- made another insurance on the property! Kudence that there was anotiier insurance o, the property and that the apolicaiit, who was ai. J., tor the proprietiir, declared that there . s no other insurance on the ,,roperty-yy,V-/, KtlerTr; '"r"'"'' "^ ''"' "'■^'•'•^■■■■■'■to know hithei the app leant was interested with iheni wa.s If there was no other insurance, An-ell on Fire Insurance, p. 174 a, and the defendant "•as entitled to the conclusion o I i pt '^ I ' ' ■ng that the insurance he declared n, II or^ e 2(,l). Action for .«l,U0t3, insurance on a house urn, «re, etc. Plea, that hy his applic u!o lie ormed the has,s,,t', he insurance, plain- titl had fal.sely declared that there was no «as a hypothec e.xcee.lmg j;l 07. In the ai.nli- cauonthe 12th,,uest,ou%;as, " wnat "iS- I iiance, if any, is now on said iiropertv?" Answer: " \.t any." Plaintiff e.'ainined as a witness a.lmitte.i that the last §100 of the purchase money with interest was only paid on tl e .'(,t|, of August, 1S78, the tire hav n '' taken place on the 3rd January, 1878 He s I'e" quenty sold the laid for *±12_A,/,,£n is';::; 1. plea that as the mortgaged,,! not alU'ct the k, and as I.ere was no evidence of had faith reeoev'""' )/'''''"'""%"''" ''^' "'''« ""titled to lecover. Duhanne. y. Thv. Mutnil Firr U-ir: fw<;« C'«. of the. Vountiex of ~Lnnd Vhamhiu k- Jacques earlier, 2 L. N. 115, S. U I87!) 413 IxNSUEANCE. 261 And hdd, also, tlmt the comnanv had waived Its right to otiject on accounroldelay in .iriv,i,« notice as the hoanl l,v i,H resohition March 2bth, S78, had re.siMed the da no other grounds alone. lb v, a, in on 2<;2. Wliere the insured', at the time the insur- ance was efleete,!, omitted to disclose the fact that four months previously, on the occasion of apohtical election, he was informed tha he people there threatened that if the peon e of Pas|,e .lac came up there to beat th > people they, the people of New Carlisle, would burn' li^ Phortly alter the ,nsuran(,.e was elfected was .Mipjiosed to be the work of an incendiary, but Jllrea^ "■//.connected with ,l,e election or' the HMt,,n Mnhud Fire Insurance r„ 2 [/\ 1880 *'^' ^ ^^ ^- ^- "'■ -■''^' •^- c. it.' INSURANCE. 414 policy, and that the clianje of aHai.-nee was not m.ch a change of ownership or ,rosse.-sion as 2ir: r '^V"""^^'l totheinsura;,cecon,panv, "rider a stipulation that il the |,roperlv be sold or transferred, or any change take'place in title or possession, whether by legal process or judicial decree or voluntarv translVr or oon- yevance,or it the policy shalfbe assignci before loss without the ..onsent of the compnnv the eon. then an, ,n every such case the policy Co., 23 L. C. J. 12, Jt 1 L. N. 150, Q. 1>. 1«78 XXIII. PaYMKXT ok PliKMlLM- XIX. Mutual Companies. By Q. 42-43 Vic. caps. 31) and 40. and 44-45 V c. caps. 21-20, provision is made for the estab- hshment and regulation of Mutual Assurance Companies. ^^umuue XX. Nature of. 2ti3. A life insurance policy is a moveable, and as .such is payable to the testamen tan- executor ot the deceased. Arc/uunbau/ll XXr. Of Catti.k in Tua.vsport. 2(i4. Action for the recovery of a thousand riollars, amountof insurance on a stud horse brought acro.S8 the Atlantic. The horse had been shippe.l in good condition, and was prove.l o h.'ive died from the roughness of the passage, he weather being stormy, Delendants'pleach.l that the los.sd„i not arise from any of the perils insured against that the horse became sick an,l (led on board the vessel, and that therefore the detendants could not be held liable. Also urge,l that the owners were responsible for the atiseiice of proper precaution to prevent the horse from being injured. The plea, however, was not su.stamed by the evidence, while the plamtitt had established the facts set up The cmestion was, did the policy cover the case ?- Hehl, that it did, and judgment accordin.rly Limerv. Western As.mraiwe Co , 7 R. L. 2«, o. L, J 074. XXII. Of Goods in Hand.s of Assignee. . 265. The defendants, an insurance company. iTZ ''"■ ''*",'''''' ^^^'&^^^ i" ll'e amount of *.^,000, against loss to that amount upon a stock ot tweeds etc., in a building occupied by C H C as a residence and tailor's store, for three months only (loss, If any, payable to the estate of fi;. I •■•*;■ J^'''''"'^''''" ""' creditors appointed the plaintifl assignee to the estate. In an action oil the policy-Z/.A?, reversiuL' the jinhr- iiinuoi the Superior Court, that the assigne'e entitled to bring action for the amount of the .2fi(,, Action on a life policv to recover a cer- tain amount claime,! to l,e .hie thereunder. The question was, whether the amount of insurance claimed on the hie of deceased was lorfeited by ttio non-payment of the premium. The coiii- pany, a foreign Corporation, ceased to do busi- iiess in Lower Canada after the 1st Mav 1877 and to have an agent there to whom pavmeiu -Olid be made. The plaintiff urged that it was ■J Ins duty to go to England, where the bead office of the company was, m order to pay the premiunK-y/.W, maintaining the action.' Do- ''"'" X' J i'^ I "'''''!■<' Oonriimeii/ Life A.s.im- aiire Co., 23 L. C. J. 2(11, .S. C. 1878 2li7 The res,,ondeiit obtained an' insurance om the appellants' companv tor S43(), and he ,,,.en.ium wa. ,,aid by a pron-issory note tor .*(.30, payable three m..iiths alter date. The policy was delivered to the insure.l, and by its crms the sum of ,$4v30 was acknowled..-e",l to liiive been received. A Hre occurred and the company refused to settle the loss, because the promissory note had not been paid at maturity. ~ '"I'l, that the company having by the policy acknowledged payment of the premium, could .0 be permittee^ to plead non-payment in defence wV A .,>'''-."""■ ^ ^'- ^- 1^.^^ ^4 J'- C. J. I i, V' J>. 18 1 'J. XXIV. Prescmi.tion of Claim f OR. 2(i8. A claim for insurance under a poliev is prescribed m five years. Jom-s y. S„n VuLnl ZbJ. W here action was brought on a policv of tire iiisurance.and the,lefen,lants pleade/l tliepre- scription of one year under the policv-//,W, tlidt an unaccepted tender of money in settlement was not an interruption of such" prescrintior" inn Q / /'?.^o'"'^ ^"'^ ^"*""'-"«M Co., 1 L, N. XXV. RiuHT OF Action on Poi.icv. ■ ^1^- Ptaceof.—Kn insurance company, Imv- ing its domicile at Montreal and issuing i'ts poli- cies at Montrea takes risks at Quebec by means of us agent resident there-//./,/, that the cm ! pany could be sued atQuebec,as the right of ac- tion arose there (TMalle,, v. ScoltisirComm^r- '•";'[''f '•'.""■« «S 4 Q. L. R. 221!, S. C. 1878. -71..'\ftionnn Rpieniium note given Ibrinsiir- ance in a Mutual Insurance Company. The action was taken at Waterloo, in the district of Bedford, where the head olKce of the company i I 415 INSUEANCE. was situate.) and serve,] on defendant in Ver- cheres in the district of Montreal, wliere he resi.ie, ,ind wliere tlie note was executed.— ^^^/, that the action should liave heeii in the q^'i I ofV^^"*'"'"'"'' (^"- ^' Jii>'nvenu, 2 L. N. ^72. Action on a preuiium note iu a Mutual In- surance to. Ihe application was made or taken in the disinct of Bedford to a coinpanv havin" itH head othce in Sherhrooke. in the district oT h . 1 rancis. Ihe note was ,„a,|e pavable at Nierhrooke and the policy isMie,! there-//,/,/, brooke. M,u,„,l Fire hi.mmn.e Compmu, of 1880 "■ ^"^'>'*'' ^ ^- ^- 239, k.G.ii. 273. Motion for leave toappeal from a jiulj-inenf flisinissiiig a declinatory e.xception. The action was against an insurance coinpanv, bv the ccx- sionaircoi a policv of insurance upon" property in tlie district of Arthahaska. The application was taken in Victoriaville, in .said district, hv an agent 01 tlie company, an,l the action was insti- tuted here. Uy theexception thedelen.lants con- ten, ed that the action should have been brought at Quebec, where the policv was issued to the respon,lent. Appeal refused. TnurUpu, v. 1% "o" ,> •'/■"■"^'"'''^^ Insurance Co., 3 L. N. XXVI. Right of Ixsi-reb to Sl-k in N.^ie OP UWNEU. 274 Action to recover the value of acar-o of peas lost on the scow Maria .lose,,!,, in cTnse- 9ue„ce of a collision with a steamboat belon<'- ing to defendants in Lachine Canal. Plea, that plaintiff had been pai,l the value of the peas bv the u,surers, (l,r whon, plaintiffs were a ,„ere pretenoma.M ha,l no interes|-//^»/,/, contirm- ing the, judgment of the court below, that, not- withstan, ingthe payment by the insurers, the latter had no right to sue until notice of the transfer and subrogation, ami the action was properlv brought, liichelim .(• Ontario NavL 204, Q, B. INTERE.ST. 416 policy this relation was ma,le known to the agent, ami a p,)licy ,„a,le out an,| transferivd to appe lant f,,r the whole amount of the iuMir- ance. alih,mj;h his interest amounted onlv to ifcl ,011). —//,-/,/, reversing the jivlgment ot' ll,e court below, that he shouM have ju,ifrment li,- that amount. Sheri,hm & OUowa A,,ricutU,rul InmraiweCo., 2 L. N. 20(i, Q. U. iH7i). 277. Two of the plaintiffs were mort,'a.',.os of a pniperty belonging to the other plaintill>lio insure,! the pi-operty, and for the securitv of the mortgagees made the loss, if anv, pavkble to fhem to thee.xtentof their claim. The biiildin-s iiKiuestion were destroyed by fire a couple of nionl!,s afterwards. Tlie comjiany on demand refuse,! to pay and enaction brought pleade,! inter a ,a a vio ation of one of the con,!ilioi,s of the policy, m that the a.ssured had, without the consent of the insui-ers, iiiMired the premises ii, an,)ther company-y/t/,/, reversing the decisi,j,i of the court below, that the riglits of the mort- Kascen could not be affecte,! bv the acts of the TC'^^l- A^'rh^ ^yutional Insurance Co., 3 L. N. 29, & 24 L. C. J. (i5, Q. B. 1871). X.XIX. WlNDlXU VV Ll.- C0.MI'A.\IES. 278. Provision for the v/in,ling up of insol- vent incorporates 1- i.-e or Marine Insurance Companies is made by the Dominion Statute, 4i Vic. cap. 21. ' INTEEDICTION. I. Action- auai.vst LvTEunicT, see ACTION, fjalion Co. & Lafrenih-e, 2 L. N INTEREST. IX Action, ^ee XXVII. Secured to Wive.s and Chii.diien. 275. By Quebec statute 41-42 Vic. can 1.1 provision is made for securing to wives aii,! children the beneht of assurances on the lives of their husbands and parents. XXVIII. Transfer of Policy. . 27(i. Action for $3,280, un,ler a policv issue,! in tavor of one who, on the 23rd Aui;., 187(1, transferred to appellant. The Hre occurre,! 27th beptejnber, 18<(,. Plea, that the transferor ob- tained tlie policy on the representation that lie was proprietor of the property, which was un- true. By the evuience it ajipeared t!,at iu 187! Bome years previous to the issue of the policy, U,e transferor sold the property to appellant with the stipulation that he would be at lib.'rtv to take back as soon as !,e !ia,i repaid anpellui.t the amount he owed him, lie him.self reinainin,' lu possession. At the time of the issue of the I. AnUKEMENT TO PaY. a/Jp,!!'v';'^''''''"'' '■'""•^' Ca1>1TAI, AC! IO.\. HI. In IxsiiiAxcE, see INSURANCE. 1 V. •ILIIISIIR'TION OVER, V. Ox Bank Dei'osit. Vf. On Hypothec. VII. Ox Ixtehest. mIrItIMe'S:^'^'^^'"'^''"''^"'^'-^ IX. Ox Moxey Paid in Error. A. On- Open Account. XI. Ox Taxes. vffi '''"^■':« •>^■ CoMi'AxiES to Pay. All!. Prescrh'tiox of. XIV. Proof of Pay.mext by Verhal Evi- DE.VCE. XV. R|(;HT TO. XVI. What is. XVII. When Payahi.e, sec DEEDS, Ixter- I'RETATIOX OF. n Distinct from Capital. 27!». Annual interest is distinct from the capital froni which it ari.ses, and if accrued under the Co,le will be regulated bv the Co,!e, even when the claim to which it is- accesfiurv accrued prior to the Code. Herbert ic Menard, 10 R. L. 6, S. C. 1876. ilST, 416 4r INTEREST. niaile known to tlip out and traiislen-cd unioiint of the insiu- t aiiKiiinted onlv U) lie .jii'lgnii'Mt of ilie il liavi' jinlgtnent I'u;- Ol/iiira Ai/ricaUiiral Q. n. iHT.}. Hs were ni(ii'tfraj;Mos le other phiintitl'.who )r the Fecnritv of'tiie if any, pavahk> to ilaim. The tmililin;.'s I iiy fire a couple uf onipany on (ieinaml on brought [ileaiied of the comlitioiis uf •eii had, without the ired tlie preniise.-i in versing the ilecisiun rights of the inort- ! hy the actw ol' ilie iiiial Lifiuniiice Cu., , Q. B. 1879, COMPANIES. inding up of iiisol- Marine Insurance Uoiuiuion Statute, 'ION. uicT, see ACTION. T. Ai. IN- Action, gee iURANCE. OF Collision-, see iUOR. ! TO Pay. iiv Vekual Evi- 3 DEEDS, IxTJ::!!. listinct from the 1, and if accrued ited by tlie Cude, oil it is acccfisory 'erbert osit. 1>*\ . PlaintitK, a merchant, Iiavintr a deposit ""■',',''.'''.::;"'' ''l^' 'l«'f^'"'la.its, daimed the sum ot irl(.8',l8, as the balance due bin., inclu.lin.r uiterest at a stipulated rate of six per cent. The (|uesiiou arose as to the interest on Jilu i:il amount ol two clieques, one lor SilU,00(), pre- sented August 7th, and (l,e other for %bh\, nresented August 8ih, and certified good by the' bank, but not paid until October .sth" following. I laiiitilf contended that lie was entitled to interest until jjayment, while the bank said the interest stopped at the time the chwpies were cresenle,! and certiHed-y/e/,/, that the plainlilf ha.l no right to interest alter the certiticatnni of 3 L,t,''7ts. c:''l8S(f '^" ''""''"' '"'" ""'"■''' Vl. Ox IIVPOTIIEC. 2H2. The defendant purchased an immove- able from the opposant, who had previously given a hypothec on the s,,me property. The price ot Mie was stipulated payable in" instal- ments w,t/,ou( interest. The " immoveable in question wa.s afterwards sold at judicial sale in theban.lsot the deten.lant, an,i on a report of dis ribution of the jiroceeds, the veinlir w.a« cu located for tlie balance due on the price of sale, with interot ou the overdue instalment- IH'I, that notwithstanding the stipulation without interes., he was entitled to interest on ovenlue instalments ex naturae rei. Arpia y LuiHoureux & lioirhi, 7 R. L,, S. C. 1875. VII. On Interest, 288, In ail action for the amount of overdue coupons on boiids-y/,;W, that interest on such coupons only ran from the institution of the action. Mar,lm,,att v. Montreal Warekoumu, t(/., S L. N. ()4, S. C. 188U, IX. On Money Paid in Error. 284, Where action is brought fortlie recovery of money paid in error, and the defeiKhmt is jiroved to have been in good faitii, interest will he a lowed ti-om date of service of process only. i87!lffo?i a'c! '^"'''''^^ ^- ^' ^- ^•'•^' ^' «• 28o. In an action to recover money paid under an illegal assessment r.dl, interest will be allowed only from the date of the institution Jii'/hs A- Cty 0/ MoiUren/, 2 L. N, MO, A 2'i 9 ■.,) I :,'!'V ' „" '/*'"" '■• ^'"!/ <>fMontreal,dL. N, 2s2, A2-iL, C,J.222, y. B, 1880, X. On Open Accounts. 2kC, Action w.as brought in assumpsit on an accounte-xtending over ,seyeral years, which iiad been frequently rendered, with interest added INTEREST. from time to time at seven per cent. Defen, pleaded non as.sumji.sit to pay interest, w could only be charged on special agreeme y/cW, that the coiuhicl of defendants in ac( ing without ol,)ection the accounts as rem must lie lield to be an admi.ssion that the counts were truly stated, and judgment wen the whole am.Mint claimed. Greenslnrl.t Wyman et al., 21 L. C, J, 40, S. C, 187(1. XI. On Taxes, Ac. 418 lant hicii lit— !ept- ered ac- t fi.)r v. can 19« I r '"^,^'^^5*' "' ""^ •^'=' ' ^ & 1''^ Vic. real has no right to charge ten per cent, interest on armtrs of ta.ves. rv/y of Montreal v. /V - 180, A U, L, 5C5, S, C, l879, XII, Power or Companies to Pay. 288. A joint stock company may be authorized by the Local Legi'slatnre to "pay a rate of interest greater than si.x per cent. '.)/«. fnuja Is Mmtreal War,:housil, Co., 81 N 04, ,S, C. 1 S8() ; A li,.„al Canadian In.nranee Co. S." C 18,80 ""'■'•■'""■^■'"V <^'"-. 3 L. N. lo5, XIII. Prescription op. 289. Interest ari-es from law an,l not from the contract, and, therefore, .p.estions of pre- scription or otherwise concerning mterot are governed by the law hi force at^he t ne he 8?^ a 1870'- ^^"' '■ '^"'"''''' '^'' ^- ^' •' • 290. Interest accrued before the coming into tlieLoile IS not subli.et t,i „ ^i, ,..?. XIV, PiiooE OK Payment by Vekh PENCE, 292. And proof of payment of such interest to an amount e.xceeding fifty dollars cannot be made by verbal evidence, Jl). tothat2[^rV """'"""^ acknowledgment XV. Right to, 294 In 1804 the Grand Trunk Railway Com- pany leased, lor 21 years, the railway pWperty of the Montreal & Champlain Railmad Ijom- f;';n'«-nn'nMn'"",'''' *"■ l""''^!"'^'' '^'i''' property lor ^)(l(),000, above incumbrances 1„ Ks72 this .sale was effected under the authority of an Act passed in the 27tli and 28th Vic, cap. 85, authorizing It, -nd was conHrmed bv the 8r)th Vic. c.^ip 1,4 Thus transaction Has carried through by the Boards of Directors of the two companies, and by the terms of the agreement tlie price of §500,000 was made payable at .he 1i *i'. 411) INTEEEST. Bank of Montreal on the IstofJulv, 1S72. The it the hank acconimg to agi-ee.ne„t-to;,'ethe>- vth the rent. , ue on their h-ases upl.tht. ■ 01 July Theuppeliant, owner oCsl nhare^ n e capital stock of the .Montreal & Chan,- Pl.un Ha.lroa.l Con.pany, was entitle,! to $-,•• i 'H.oO, hem.; at the rale of $88.50 per noniiii' I £"s;^f !'"' r *''-^ !-• '"-i-i iioiia;;: pin- *t>4S tor his proporiion of rent to 1st of Juy in all $ ,Sl.i.r.O. On the Mth .,f.V„ne nh ii; "',f ;r"'7'^ "I. "'e Montreal & Chanw plain K R. Co., I,y auircular a.liire.s.sf,! to each ^harehul.ler, ,nfor:ne.l the appellant that o p.-c'.^nitat,on of hi.s certilicate.' 'of ,s,ock a t e iJank ol Montreal, on the Isl Julv then next '"".i "". signitij; a profier .li.seharge,lie vo , he pa„lhi,s,.tockat the al.ove rate if $44 25 per In.n, re.l, an,l ,n a,|,li„on his .livi,kM„l on \hl rent then .lue. This circular was i„ the tern.s of the agreement entere,! into between the two co.,manie.s ami of the Acts of Par ianu a an hori.ing then,. The appellant n'eca or us n.onev until the 2,,! August, l«7o. w e liun. Ihis he (h.l under prole.st that he was entitle,! to interest on the same since tie fTrst day ol July, 1,S72. Action Ibr $l,:)f U s " hose interests which t!,e appellant claitned to be dt.e o hitn ex >,at„ra ,dZ his share of the price ot the realty transferre,! to ti.e resn,m- dents and whicli interests he contemled c n- t.nue.l to run ,n his favor in .ie.ault a p lo- per te.ulerot the money as required hv the c' ,k. to stop the accruing ot inlerelt-//.W. thar le price ol real estate hears interest ex ua ra -^ a.id without any stipulation to tl,a X in favor o the veinlor until it is pu„i or d, ors T';. '\';' "' "r ""^'^ ""^ «-"•'' -^^ n eJ^ to.8 ol the Mont-val and Uha.nplain liailroad Ccmipany, who alo.ie were authorise 1 to ake .e sale lor the stockholders, havin.r a reed Mo trear'rr''""''' ^'f P-^"' ""othe^HaiTk'o Monti eal ; and respondents paid it at the time and place stipulated in then- agre.n ne t Lnd having, lone .so th.:^y ha,l fultille3 thei ohlLa tions, an.i could not now he calle.i upon to nav interest which they had never agreed to na? And that the appellatit, hy accept^ he prC.:!: pal, had ratiried the action of the Board of «hare 'h' "■'""*".''^' "1 ""^^ fansact.on lo the sharehol, ers, and coul.i not now accept t e pnce ol the sale and repiuliate the condh,!:,., on which It was .na,le. Judgment conHrmed mm,,,,, & Grand Tnink l{,iilw.„j, Q. B I877 ^.'o. In an action against a cimtwi, s„U,lairc n,lei an obligation niade in mi-JIeU • t lie plamtilf wa.s entitled to the interest stn hue,[up to 1st August, 1806, when th 'c 1 ^ .pLtrrcit^-^^Sete- INTERVENTION. 420 XVI. What 2.)rt. Where ten peri'ent. per annum on arrpars o axes was ,m,..sed by ihe city of Montrea ndf I the names „u-rea^,, addilwn or ,„:„„.U,. ls<- \ f;"""-".'': ^, '''!' "f 'Montreal, 2 L. N. 18b, ic !) Yi.L. oiJo.S. C. I87y. IXTEIiFEIlENCE. \A\\^ ^'''^""^ '^"^ K>KL'TioNS,«ee ELECTION INTEKLM EECEIPT-^<3e msUR- ANCE. INTEIiLOCUTORY JUDGMENT- See JUDGMENTS. INTEllPIiETATION. 1. Of Covtkacts, .v,v CONTRACTS. PERTY ' "' "^'""'■'^"Tv," ,ee PRO- INTERROGATORIES. dure! '^"■''^'^'''^ted Facts, see PROCE- INTEEEUPTION. I. Of Prescription, see PRESCRIPTION. INTERVENTION. mmtSmM ure iirtacnued Oy live years. 2;!5u c. C. I. Lv Appeal. II. In Insolvency. III. Pleading in. IV. Power ok Codrt to Order. V . Procedure in. yi. KiGHT to Intervene. V II. Service of, I. In Appeal. for^ mithVienl'"!'''""'"" :;'■", ''^ '*"o^^«' '■" appeal lor SI thciei cause. M,'ch,xni,-s Bi,i,k v. St Jean ic Wylie, 2 L. N. 315, Q. B, 1879. II. In iNsoLVE.vcy. 2'J8. An hitervention in insolvencv, filed vviih- 34G S C 1879 "'"'' ^ ^"'"'"' ^ ^- N. TION. 420 Br linn um on ftrrpars le city of Monirciil idtlHion or iie.iKiUi/^ oftlieQiicliedljcjri'N. ■nd to he ultra L'iri'n, Muntreal, 2 L. N, y. NCE. »s,*ec ELECTION -See INSTJR- IIDGMENT- NTS. noN. rRACTS. TV," .iee PRO- )RIES. s, see PROCE- ON. ESCRIPTIOX. ON". 421 INTEEVENTION. III. Pleading ix. 29y An intcrvpiiant cannot plead nialters of 1878 ' ' ^^ ^' ^- ^- -'''■>> «• ^• IV. POWKK OF Col'KT TO Ordkk. loHMsl ,p,s ISai.k to in(e.-vc-Me ami take un the in. Ma/ie, A: ^ly/we;-, 2 L. N. 378, Q. B. 187'J. V. PKocKnriiE IX. riN,!:. r!'"'"': "r '■"'^"•''"■^nt foreclose,! the pa.Mei Iron. ,,lea.lin- lo a case, and inscrihed it exy.,rf. on the n.erit.s withoni produci ' nv VI. Rkjiit to I.vtkrvene. betv(tn the ,-rvioe atid entry of tiie principal ac lun ,M not prentature, the principal aotionCe. ngpendin,^^ within the mean, ng of Art 154 of the Code „1 Procedure* from the .no, e t of ll e erviceolthewnt and declaration consdtnt , r .^ifid:;;s^-inu;';o"ittSrSi!: IRREGULARITIES. 422 VII. Service of. •lO t. The service of lliUnlilf: an intervention upon the Q i!R:'iS,s''c:i878.'^'^"" •" ""''''' -^ m5. A deniand In Intervention was sei -ej !>' the parties heC.re allowance-//cW thai INTOXICATING LIQUOR. I. Action- fou, .s,;; ACTION. Jl. KE;;ii,ATio.\ of Traffic in-. 301). The regulation of the IrufHc in «.,It u:;;^,/::ii-n!!«-' !-' »-« e.o„tof ape,„ii„« maintai,, his rigUi!^;^ 164 c!c. r!'-'"^ "'"'■•-''" '" "''^^ '" INVENTORY. ^ L^^Made hv Execltoks, ktc, ,ce EXECU- invp:stxMents. TRATORs""'""""'''""'' ™'' '^^^ ADMINIS. IRREGULARITIES. I. In- Aruitration-, see ARBITRATIOV II. Lv Opi-ositio.v, iee OPPOSITION.' ' A. If, 4 DEB. J. SUxMMARY OF TITLES. 1 lowed in appeal '.s- Bank v. Ht. !. 1879. ency, filed with- > rejected sans Boiiin, 2 L, N. Page JETTISON 423 JOINT AND SEVERAL .".'.'"' 423 JOINT STOCK COMPANIES 423 JOURNEYMEN......... ^o'! JUDGES '_y_'/'_" 423 JUDGMENTS '..........'..' m Page JUDICIAL ADVISER 433 JUDICIAL xVOTICE 439 JUDICIAL OATH " .' 439 JURISDICTION 429 j^^Y :.':;;;:;;;:433 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE 436 423 JUDGES. JETTISON. JUDGMENTS. 424 I. LlAliri.lTY Foil I'^UMCIT ON ClOOPS J K'l TisoNini, .sec AFl''l{|':i(;ilTxMK.\T. JOINT AND HK\K\IAJ.—See OBLI- UATK )NS. JOINT STOCK C()MrANIES_6W' CUM PAN I ES. JOUliNEVMEN ~Src MASTERS AND SKUVANTS. I. PuiVlLWiK OF rXDKIlIxsol.VKNT AcT, 1875, .m-IXSOI.VKNCY. JUIXJKS. I. CiiAUfii.; OF TO Jiiiv IN Civil. Casks, ,w JU\i\, IX Civil, Casks. II. .Mav hi-; .Vi.i.oHKi) TO 1'i.i:a1) ix Case of PitoiiiDiTiox, s<;' I'liOllllilTIOX. ifl. ()ui.i:n OF, .bY'c PJtUCEDUKE. IV . I'OWKKS OF. Jhiriiii/ Loiitj Vacatiiin. _ III ('lidiiilirrs. V. liKCl-SATlliX OF. IV. I'oWKltS OF. 1. .A JMilge of the Superior C.jiivt liiis power to uppoiiit a secpiestnitor jicii'lnife life in an action lo remove exeenlors under a will from ottioe lor iiiaiii(iiiiiiiisirjition. Jironke & Jiluom- fidd,-l:\L. C. J. 140, Q. |{. 1875. 2. A jiiilge liiis 11(1 jjower on a n'(/iiSlr cic/'ln to 8pt aside the jndgnient of another judge on the ground of errors in the eiitrv or ree.ord of Puch judgment. Cni-terv. Molsoil & Holmes, 21 L. C., 1.210, .S. C. 1S77. ;S. piin'ii;/ LoHij rm7(//n)(.— During tiie long vacation a .judge haa tiie same powers that lie has at any other time of 'he vear with respect to matters to he done out of" term. Xolaii v. V,i.s/,„(.s, 4 Q. L. K. ;i;!o, s. C. R. 1878. 4. Jii t%nw^;(TO.— Semhie, that one judge in cliamhers lias no power to revise an order ol another jud^je in oliainbers. Ihrif.dik Seciiri- iies .{■ ..Vorfipi,/,- Aaxocki/hin v. A'ticinc, 2 L. N. 287, S. C. 1871». 5. A judge of the Queen'.s Bench in cliam- ber.s may extern! the delav for sriviiig securitv on appeal to the Privy Council heyond the delav ordereil liy the court, whenever he is seized of the matter prior to the expirati(jn of such delav. IhcMw/ur, .f-r., ofMoninal S: Hubert et uL, 21 L. C. J. 85, Q. B. 1877. . Recusation of. 6. In a controverted election casp motion made to reject certain particulara from the petition, cliarging an agent (jf the defemlant with corrupt pnictices. ,lndge heloiv whom the motion was made considered himself inconi|)e- tent lo hear the molion, inasmuch as the agent III (iiipslioii was his llilher-in-law.* Mus^i .fc llobilluni, 10 R, I.. 22(1, S. C. 1880. JUDGMENTS. T. AcyilESCKXCIO IN. U. Bv Dkfaii.t. JII. By rilOTIIOXOTARV. JV. Caxxot he Attackeh iiv ViiiiiiAi. Kvi- IIEXCE. v. Chose Juoee. \'I. KintoKs IX. V'll. ix ClIAMHEliS. VIII. iNTEiii.orrToiiv. n'h'it (in: IX. Not lOxi-.ciTouv. .\. Of Co.mmissioxkhs fou Khiictiox ok Paiusiiks,,w CO.M.MI.SSIOXKRS. \l. Of Distiuct .Maoistuates. XII. Si:ci-uitv foii Costs aftku, .vcj; CUST.S. Alll. Set Aside fok l''iiAri). XIV. SlSl'EXSloX OF ExiOlTlOX OK. XV. Ci.TiiA I'etita. X Vr. Wii.i, NOT UK Set Asihe on Accoixt uf lECIlNKJAI. iuUEUl-I.AUlTIKS IX PitOCEll LKE. I. AcqriESCENCE IX. 7. Motion to reject an appeal on account of acquiescence. The appellant was condemned hy the court helow to pay a certain delil, he nui liaving maile his declaraiion as tins xi'isi. In tiicl he was domiciled in an. Jtlier district, iiinl iiad there made a declaiMlioii that he owed iiu- tliing, within tiie proper delav. He tlien inoveii the court in Arthahaska to revi.se this judg- ment, and to allow him toniaUe liis declaratiuii anew. The court granted the petition, hut cun- demiied him to all costs. Ajipellaiit moved lijr leave to apjieal, Init in tlie meaiiliine so far con- Ibrmed liimself to the anieuded order as to make a new declaration— //cA/, that this was nut an aniiin'scement. Marquis & l\m Conrllundt, i L. X. 278, Q. B. 1878. • A iiy juiign may lie n'ousoil : 1. If lie is re ate. I iii- iillieil to onoof tlie partio.s witliiii tlii^ degree of coii.-in (jeriiniii iiiolusiviily. '-;,'•] I'" '"'^ ".""i,' .l.:pen.liiij,' upuu tlie sarno ouoitloii us tliiil 111 issue 111 llie on.-... .). If he lias given advice upon the matter in di^niite, or liiis liievioiisly tnlten coRiiizaneo .if it us nn arh.tiiit..r- 11 ho has acled as siilleilor ls will sit as jii.IgH 6. If he has iiiaie verbal or wri'u.'ii threats a"ain-t one et Die pirlies since tlie be.'iiuiiiiK of the suit ,.r wiiljiii SIX iii..iith« previous to Ilie ri.ciisation, or if there has been inorlal eiinuiy between them witlioul rtcoii- cihati.m. 0. If lie is the maiiiiRer or patron of any order, eornor- ntion or communily which is a parlv to the sun, or tlw tutor, honorary tutor, suhtonate tutor or cunit.ir, heir or don,... .il i.ith.'r of iheparti.-.s „„',;," "'J-'.',"/, »!'y,'"'-'^rest in favoring citlior of the TS. 424 425 rilifilclViiilant willi licHirc wlioiii the liiriiscir iMci)in|ii'- tlllllcll iis tilc H;;(.rit iii-luw.* Musne it ;. isso. :ts. iiY V'i;itriAi, Kvi- JUDGMENTS. lilt Kitia'Tio.v OF ;i';its. Ti-:s. PTKU, .set' COSTS, 11. l'TION ov. UK ox AcCOl'XT OF : I'liocKKl'Ki;. oul on aoeoiint of \vii.-< cdiuk'iiiiu'il Ttiiin (Iclil, lit' lull s ficm .•ici.'ii. In thcr (ILxtrict, iiinl that Ik> uu't'il iiu- Hc tlu'll llluVl'll rcvi.'^o tlii.s jililj;- t' iii.s (Ifclivriitiuii !)i'titioii, lint Cum- ic'lhiiil iiHivc'il lur .iitinie .«() tin- con- (iniei- iis to nmke tliii< wu.** lint an uii Ciiurlktnilt, 1 f tlio partio.< wilhin uly. the samo question laltei' in flisjiute, or '. as an arli.traloi-; r of the i.arlius, or lichilly. I! buluri! a court in I'n'' I'll llirpats a^ain.-t iiiK of tlio sun i,r nsiitioii, or if there em witliout ricou- any order, eorpor- to the sun, or tlio ■ or curator, hoiror ing either of the il. fiv I)KF.\n,T. 8. Ajinl^-mcntrnWomli,, ,„,.„, I,v .iofjinli i„ o|)|i,i.-■< III uic i.-tr,ci oi i{id„.|,,„, „„ lUi J'f; i-uiniann.or,,,,.',,Hvi:i::,,r ',:;;:;v7 action vvasili.-iMissi,!. Tl,,. „|,,i„,,ii i', ' ' ."■^-;i 'i>"t .1... ,iM,i.nn.!,, ,i!;!r:^ ' ;i^t !;;i;: renilemior prononnc.',], ,„ wit : „„ a | ; ;. regiiarly a,,,„i,„l,.,|, ami ont of tc , lA- . tli>■.l''l^^■,alls,nl^„na,iayo,l„■|,u;|, H,,. .,, •. Co,ndno,..xpo.,H,an,lwc'n',||.,v|,,,;'u !'r y/<.-/,/,tliatllK.ol,je,:tion l,v tlic plainlill ha ,„ (Je I'chrre v. I'„n:nt, S. C. I{. I,s7,s. IV. C.vxxdr iiK Att.vckki) DEXt'lC. I'V Vkriiai, E VI- llK'c„l :,. >l L. |;::i:;;:^i::rs.';;:;,;5*^ £j;B ;;-''Vo.ntiio,i,.st,,fXov.S;e,,S;V'-- St.tir-'- ''""'"'•■■"I'iNtappI,,' ,,," t^ nil t K,.vi,,,„„ ,„ t „, M ft '^l"''' l>e jnil^'inent as la.t en '7- -1 thai i,>p„ii.eiit hail, Min^'iileil u, (|k. •iim„ //'V'/, tliat this wiiMliI li(..;„rrectV,l I V ' ' i~ .n..nl.,.y ji„|,nne,it. Gohl ^, ^ tj]^'^"^- \ 'I. I.X ClIAMUKIt.-i. --uin'feJi,.:;::::;.?:::-;:^,;;::;-,.-'^ lmviii.Mi law , I. r •'''"';.''■'''. ,'" '^li'unliera VIII. IxTERI.OCfTORV. of this kii Q. B. 1878. I . 18. An interluentorv jnihrment reienti,, , I ni.''.= nptioi, for r^/<7««/c. mnr m,!" tH - f '''' I't'en filcl |,(,,;,ro articulati n , ' ''"''"'S I ncJ >/ ""V«"^^^''- HI. alteration ,.c tho i " "■'"'■" "'7''' ^'"^ ''"■" '' '^'-^V.w.,,/ A. IV' imlge who ren,ler« the final ju.i.. and tlie court may wTtiiout n ,v ^- " !" '''' '"""W'.l, rectiflcalioii ofthe /egtater""!?"'!]; u?!p'."""^' °''^'"'' ""-' . i I 1 < d li^f II 15 427 JUDGMKNTS. 21. A jmlirmpnt iimintaiiiiiii: a f(l ln'ilii't'c JiMlg.'s in Ucvicv. Lottinrillr v. MrO'nrnj, 4 Q L. H. 212, S. U. U. IHIH. 22. A JMilgnifiil niiiiiitiiiuiiiir ii nixtion lo (lisiMiss a Hpcciiil niiswiM- ii wiis lii'lil cdiiM iKil lie i-i'vimmI 111 till! liciiriiiL' on the nicrils t'd-i'-y i\:S/i,iw, .< L. N. 'JO, S. C. IH.SO. 2;;. H7(((/ f/z-f. — Dt'lcndunt nio.fstd reject Ihi- I iMsenptiori \<\ |iliiiiitill, on tlic frninnd of the I jniljiMieiil lifiri;: iin iiilerlcKMitorN' tilile (if Review. "The in,lj;rnent ' orders tlie [ilainlill' to make (i|]ti<,n wi'ilnndavs between two inconipatilile causes of aeiion — J/c/i/, to lieinterldciilorv, and eoMse<|Meiitlv not t-nlijeet to revision. Fair A: Ci.sni/.i, [i L X If^.), S. C. H. iHhO 21. A .judf,'nient setting' aside tlie venliet ol a Kpecial jii IT, and ordering' a new trial, is not "neli an iiiteiloentorv indj;nient as niav not Ik- appealed to the Pr'iv'v Council Ijitiiihkiii v. SoijU, h'a.sl,rii Ny. Co., 2i L. U. J. ;t23, P. C. 1^77. X. Not E.\KciTORv. 25. No jnd'jnient will he rendered which ean- not he enlorced. Ltiiii/ ^S: liaanl I'm- llif M.tn- ii(/niiriilof the TiniijHirulitics Fund, » K. I, ;j Q. ii. lf<7(i. XIII. Skt Asidk Foit Fkaid. 2l). Where a claiMmt>t on an insolvent estate, liv reason i,f (he liiet that certain receipts were inislaiil and could nut he found, and hv lalse .statements, ohiaiiied an order of the coiirl lor the possession of cerlain jroods. the jnd;.'nien' was set asiile on rafiicle ciriti: (\il,le it SUu-arl k fiayani, 21 L. C. J. 121, S. C. 1877. XIV. SlSPKNSlOX OF E.XKCITIOX OF. 27. An application of |ilainliir for an order against delendanls, enjoinin.'r them not to execute ii jiid^rment ohi'ained' l)V them in the liecorder".s Court on the 1 I ih Septe'mlier previous, wlierehy plaintillk were condemned to pav certain sums of money a.sse>sed anainst theiV property li^ir the costs of the construction ot a certain drain. The present action had heen in.'-tituted to have thejudfrment set aside, as well as the as,sossnient roll on which the jiidirment was hased. Application granted. J/o/,«,/( A; T/ie City of Montreal, 3 L. N. '6^2, S. C. 1S«0. XV. Ultra PKTrr.\. 2.S. Respondent in,stitnted an action against appellant to recover linir cars tl.r a wwden railway, alleging himself to he the lawlul pro- prietor thereof, and further alleging that the same were sold to appellant, to he |iaid lor on de- livery at the price of 1{!1I74.2G, accompanviiiLT his (lemand with an attachment in revt'ndi- cati(jn, and concluding that he he declared proprietor ol said ears, and that ajipellant he condemned to abandon them to him, unless he prelerred to jiay the said sum of $1174.211. Appeii.inl jileaded thai respondent was not and never had been proprietor of ua.d cara, but mere- JUDTCFAL ADVISKR. 428 ly liacl lliein to nnike certain repairs thereon and additions thereto, aiMJ that respondent wa.s to have them ready and deliver Ihem to appel- lant on a certain date, and had liiiled to dd so' andapoellant had snilered los.s to the ainonnt ol live hundred dolhiishv reu-on of respondent's lai lire to have the cars done m time, which he lednccl to$2l)S, which ile-hicled Iron, ihe price of repairs and additions left .1i!Hl)2, which was the sum due respondent, and this sum he huij tendered lo resixmdent Irelore action, ami .i«keil dismissal of respondenl'sactior. Appellant re- pealed his tender and otlered conles>ion ol iii,|., o.ent lor *(H.)2 The judgment of the ciarrt lielow declared the re.spondenl ihH to be proprit- tor ol the cars, and ipiashed the atlachmenl, hut coiidennied the aiipellanl lo pav res,Hjii,|,.rit !MW)I.l , as the price of the work done on the cais—y/e/,/, in appeal, disinis>iin; ihe acliwi ■•■•'"(/ a .sc inntrrolr, that tlie demand beiii" i,, the allernalive an absolute jud-ment coul.rnut l)e given, and the jiidgmeni of tlie court beliav was therefore »//(•,/;/(■///(« and innsi beset a~ido liut inasmuch as ilie t.leadmgs „n |,„i|| h.Ips were wrong no costs were imarded in the court ■ehnv. tstnicalii Pekr.s, ' U. L. ;i(),S, q. B. XVI. Wii.i. NOT UK Skt Asinn ox Accoixt of 1 KCIIXICAI, ilUlKGlLAUITIKS IX I'llOCKDl'liK. ,. ^'•^.•, .■iV'i^" I'y i-es|Kpndent against aiipellant lor^ $;(.l, balance alleged to be due for cavpen- ler s ami joiner's w,,rk. The defendant phieled t lal the work wa,- badly , lone, and llTal the lu^^s Iheielrom exceeded tlie balance clainieii hv ihe plainlilt. l\n' court below gave jiid-nient Iw *J| 1 , lieing the amount claimed less SllKI ]),.. sides Ihe (piesli,,n us to the work, there was a point ol procedure rai.sed bv the appellani The cause wa.s inscribed lor hearing in October I,, •November the i/dilxre was discharged. In Uecemher the cause was re-in.scribed for hearimr on the 20th, and that day it was contimud tC ilie lOih January bv error, that dav bene a hundiiy. The appellant contended that the In- scription lap.sed. andtimttliejinlgment, which had heen rendered on the ;{Ut .lanuarv willunit aiiv liirllier inscription or liearin-, was'irregiilur --fl<'l(/, that the defendant was to blan'ie in allowing the case to goon, ami the judgment I'eing goo5. C 18(7, 429 JURISDICTION. JUDICIAL NOTICE— &fl EVI- DENCE. JUDICIAL OATUSee PliOCE- dui;e. JURISDICTION. 430 JURISDICTION. I. ArmiKSCKNCK IX. II. In Casks (.'o.m.mk.nckd nv Capias. III. IX I ASICS OK L||)|.;l.. IV. In Ciii.MiXAi. Ci.ak(;ks kok Jsjviusr. PR(11'KI!TV Uistk!) HV I'IKA ok Tnr i ? Clil.MIX.U.LAW. '•^- *^« \'. In Im.kction- Cas: s. VI. I.s- Insomkncy, ,sreIN.SOLVE\CY \ . IXI.KSSOK AND I.KSSKK CaSICs. V III. UK ( IHCliT. ColliT. IX. (>■ Col'liT OK .Al'I'KAl,. X. Ok Coiht ok Hi;vikw. v!; *A''' '"■'"■"""'' '^■•^"''•■^■'■''ATE. OFVAuLnSF: ^^^"'■'™' - ACTS ■3i!!' ^'■' '•'•^'■:l"0K Triiu'nal. AlV. Ok .liiKjK. \Vn ^ J"'^''*'-i^'"ArK'sC„iKT, V,- • ^'■' <^' KKN'^ Ukmii. YY ■rP''t''^''''"t'"'- ^'"'"■'' '"•• Canada. YVr J ^"'^^-^''^'IKAl.TV COCKT. YY r '.^'Ai'iN" \VA.Nr OF, ,a! PIJ.:AI)rXG. LA\V "'"'•" "■''■'■"' '^"'' •^■«'' '-JL'EXSE V. In Ei.eotio.v Cases. '-i.yiisu.,.::^:;^;';,;:; ;!-,;;-: -;-« \ I- l.V I.NSOI.VENCV. . ;i.>. Thp Circuit Court Im."* no niris.lictinn .^ K.n „M,.olv.,K.v,>| gl,„a,,,,..ar„|,a t »iit i.s.v|H.il ajiuiiist a iHiii trailer an, I il,„ Vir. Ix LicssoR Axu Lessee Ca.ses. •'ili. TheCircpil Court in Montreal |,a- inrl. ^';Hon.orese.n,ial,.a.eor a lamse , .„. I H-k.',l Ions witlnn (l.e „n.s,li,;t,on oftlieC r,t tA.-vt,./ V. yy,„7, 1!1 L. C. J. JOo, c. c. 1V77 VIII. Of Circuit Court. I. ACQl'IESCENCE IN. 31. A cau.=e whioli sliouM have been tried in ne ,l,s.r,et wa« ren,ovo,i to another on , ec( n ot the recusation of the jn,lj;e. The Welen,!' n aH'e;uvd a>Mi piea.ied. iilna- /.^.. ,/•,,; i! ^n-.|, ion en J,wx. hut llMdin- no lUiilt with the jnns-,i,ction-y/eA/, that the ,,M,.siion o i, leioncouMnot be raised a'fterwards in' e- S;aiHS'f42C:C.1"'''^'''''''' ^- ""■'''' 11. Ix Cases Co.mmenced hy Caimas. , 32 Where an action for .«(i7 was ori jiii'is.lii'iiim Id #"i((, miulc it niiiici'i'H^iuv In tMilcr liitii the fii^f. Tin' jilJL'ini'iil (|iiu«liiiij; till' writ III' |in>lnliitli>ii whh ri'vcr^cd. /l/iiiii \- Miii/islidlrn Ciiiiii fur Coiiiili/ nf linniif. <}. It. 1S77. ' ' ■ .Mil. Ok Inkkuioii 'ritiiii nai.. •tl. A wi-il of pniliiliitiiill will not lie In rc^iniiii nil iiiliM'ior Irllniiiul on ihc j;i-niiiii| iil' waul urjiirisiliiMiuii, miiIcs,s i is ii|i|v:ii'i'iit on llir lure dl' llic |ii'(K', Q. li. 1S7S. ' .\'IV. Or ,Ii'i),i|.:. ■I."). Tlipjiiiljjo ill lii.x ilistriitt lia>i Jiiiisiliciidii Id diili'i- iIh' i-siiiii^' dill wnl dr'|irdliiliiiiiiii, fvcii llidiii;li lie lie nol m tlic rlul-livH. liuii ^ /•V,/,v,r, i; g. I,. |{. 211, S. ('. |S77, ■l(i. A jiiil;;!' ill fliaiiilu'i-M i.s wiilmiit jiiri-ijii;. tidii Id irv till' iiu'rils dl' a piMilioii a-ldiii: a warrant iiiulfi' a rule I'dv roiilrdiiili- \,^' i\vc\M\-i\ illrjial UMil x'l a-idc. (,'i'iifriiix v. Ilnit'/n/ ,■/ nl. ^Jniif.i, '1\ I,. C. J. 102, S. C.iiir/iiiiiihn-s 1S77. XV'. Ok .ll'STICKS (IK TlIK I'lvVCIO. ■17. Two jiHliiH's dl' iiu> jn'iic'i' illU'TiM}; in d|iiiiidii liavf lid pnwcrtci call in a lliird, 'm oi'ilci- tddlilaiii a Cdiiviclidii. h'c/li/ v. /Irl-i ■ ,-r, 2 L. .\. ;i:{i,.s. c. 1S71). •Is. Oil ilic nu'rilH dl' a cfr/inrdri iVdiii a Cdii- vii'iidii I'di- krc|iin;,' a jioiisi' dl ill-iaiiic ni Si, IJi'iin, It wa- au'i'i'ccl lliat tin' jiisiicc-s wIki sal 111 till' ca.si' wiTo witlidiii jiin-cliciioii. .Iiiris- iliflidii wax diiiv ;.'ivfn to lliciii Nitliii',' at tlic (7(r/l//,'». dl' llic" liisli-icl iiikIit C :!2 ,V ;1.! \'ic. I'ajj. ;!2, A C. S. (.'. ia|i. 10,"), sfc'd,* Luciuh-ll,' txp., ;i L. N. IJ'.I, & 10 U. L. 2;i7, S. U. KSSO. XVI. Ok >lAiii.';TU.\TKs Cdiut. 4',). On tiie iiu'rits ol' a rrrliiivnri—llcl'I, llial ill iMvil iiiaUiT.s iIh' M;if;istrati'H Cdiiii has no jiirisiliL'lidii dvi'r pel-sons residinj; oiil ol' the disiricl in wliioli it i.s held. FiscI c.tp.,.\{^. L. R. 102, S. C. 1877. .initlSDK'TIOJf. .W'll. Ok Qukkn'h BK.smi, 4:^2 • Iiithl." .\ct tlu'Pxprpasioii "acompotpiil miii;istiiiti>" «liull, us ii'spreis the I'mviiico of (Jin'bi'o ami' tlio I'r.i- viiico ol' Uiitariu, iiicuu uiiil iiu'linle iinv ivcdrdci', jiiiK'p cit u County I'oiirt. Ihmi),' iijusUc" ot llio pi.iic.', coinmrs. sioiiiT of polici', jiiilj;!' olilii' so-i.ioiis of tini pi'iu'r, police miit!istrali',ilistiii:t iiuiKisiiaiciii oilier I'linclioiian' or tribaiial iiivi-slid at tlie lime of the piis-iiig ol' tliii .Vet Willi the powirs vested in it ivcordei' by cliup. 10,1 ol the Coll. .Mttts.ol CiiiKulii.entitlocI " An Act riajuftiini tilt firmiiiil mill .•ndiiiiinr!/ iiilmhiislrnliini nf vrimbn'il jiixtici- ill cirliiin fi'Ms,'' and aeliii;; witlii'ii the loe.il loiiils ot his or ot its juniidiutioii, and any I'unetioniiry or tribunal invested by Ihe proper ,egi-laiive anllniriiy with )ju«er to do alone such ;iul< as are usually rei(iiireil to be lone by two or more justices ot the iieace ; and us ri'specLs ttie I'rovlucc ol Mova Seoti.i or tliu Province ol' New lirun-wick, iliesaid expression bIiuII mean and include It coniniissioner of police and any fuiiciiohary, tribunal or person invested, or to be invested, by the l>r..ppr legisljitive aniliority with power to do alone sucii acts as are usually reiiuired to bo done by two or more justices of the peace, C. S^ & y3 Vic. cap. 3'.', sec. 1. Mh On nil appeal rroin n ooiivietion Cor rii(K' lldil, thai Minci- Ihe passin;; .if (!. ;)2 ,t :(;j Vie. Clip. 211, seo, SI),* l'epealiii;r so iniicii ol' (:ii|,. 77 ('. S, I,. (!. as wdiild aiillmn/.t' aiiv cdiiri ..i' llie I'r.ivinee dl'tiiKdiee tii divlrr m- i.'raiil a in ,>• ii'ial I iniiiy criminal case, and til'i;. :i2»V.'i:l \ie. (tap. .'Ill, lepeaiiii'; see. Ii:i ol' c.ip. 77 (;. .S. 1,^ (', Ihe (!diirl dl' (.Queen's Iteiieli lias no p iwer tl ofiuil a new Inal, and llial the .Supreme V, ,iui d I'aiiadii, cxercismo iju. drdinary appeilaie Mowers ol' llie court, under sees, ,'ls ,V; I;) ,ii :\^ Vic. cap. II, Nlioiijd /;ive the jnd;.'iiieiil wlneli liie court whose jiidj;iiient is appealed li,.|,i dnj;lit Id have ;,'iven, vi/., to revei se tjie ii|,|_,. I i lent wliicii lias hei'ii ;,'iven anddi'der priMd'ner"'s diseliar^^e. Litlilnrlii IJi lin/iini, [ S. C. Ken 117, .Sii. fi. 1H77. ' '■ X Vhl. Ok Sii'Ditiott Coiitr. Til. Th;- .Snperidr Court lias m. jiiriHdie.lidii j,, an aclidii lor sclidol taxes. (.''irjii,,'itii,ii ,,1 7oi(«'i'i"i iiiiler C. ,'!S Vic. cap. 11, ,sec. SO, iiii,| liy prdchimatidii issiii'd thefeiinde" liy order ol' till' (Joveriior in (,'oiincildii ine eleventh dav oi .liiniiaiT, lS7i!, and the said court has no iiii,,- cliciion wtii'ii (iie jii.l^'ineiil appealed Iroiii wis si'/ned dl' entered or pidndiinced previous i.i that date. Tiiijliir ,'e Ihei-eol' allow an ap|ieal in such under sec. 2ii id' the Siipi'ine and Hxclie Court .V:l.t Jli. 01. 'I'lie statute C. IIS Vic. ca]>. II, sec. IT, enacts thai no appeal shall lie alloweii iroiii any jiide;iiient rendered in the I'roviiice ol <.^leliec 111 any i^ase wherein Ihe sum or value 111 dispiiie dues iidi atinmiit to two thuii-aiid dollars H. Iiroii^'lit an action a;^aiiisi ,1., play- ing lliat ,1. he ordered to pull down the wall ui'id any cii-e |ller * .\nd so inucli of • * (;hnp. 77 of the Con. Sfnls. f,ir Lower Canada, or of luiy other Act a.^ would auiliuriz.. a ly couil i.i llie I'luviiiee of • • liuebec. lo i.i ler orKi-aiit a iieiv trial in uiiv criiniii il case, shall be, and sj iniicli of any ot iliesaid AeiB is hereby r,Mii>,leda~ re- gards any coiivieiion had alter tlie eoiiiiiij! into force .it this .Vet; and no writ of error shiiil lie alloived 111 am- eriniinal case unless ii be lounded on some nuestiou uf law which could iioi have been re-erved, or whieli tin; jinlKe presidlii),' ai ihe Inal lelused lo reserve I'cn' ihe ceii. snli'ratiun ,,t ihe court having jiinsdiciion in such can-- but nutliinj,' in lhi> section -hall becuiisinied to pievciit the siilwipieni ,r,al ol' the oIllMiiler lor the same nileaa' 111 any cas,. where Iheconvleiioii m declared bad I'.ir any c iiise \, nidi makes llie former trial a iiullily, so that there was no lawful trial 111 the case. C. '.U & M Vic. can a sec. Su. ' t I'rov ded always ihat the court preiiosed lo lie iip- pealen Iroiii, er any judge Ihereid', ma, allow an aiipeal under Special circuiiislauceB, except in Ihe case ol an election petition, iioIwiilislaiiUiiiK thai llie same niav nut be brouunt within llio time hereinbelore piescriln'tl in tliat respect; but ill such case the court or judre shall imp se such term.s ;u to Security or otherwise as sliait seem proper uuuer the circumstttnces. C. SO Vic. cai). 11, sec. :i|j. m m JUTIV. I iiiH iii.jiinsi|i(\lii,ij i,, 1. (.''ir/l:,, ■llinil nl Ion, 21 li. 0. J. II , Jiiify. «M rcnidvo .ill n..w workM (•(.inplium.,! „r. etc , i,, llH- "Hll „l II. H JmiiM., u,„| ,„.v xr.OO ,iii.i,ai;, h ,v,ll, in.. r,.>, ,.,,.] <■.,-,.. II...I,(ui„..,li„.|.'.M.„t f(.r*10 I il.i.,.ui;..M a.L'.iiiiMl .1,. „!„, „.„s aU7. n,i,- 'l''i"Mnl to r.'iMovr ll„. wnrkM .„.M|,lainc,| ..C „r pa.v III- vuluc .,1 III.. ,„il<„i,„„eU—lt,l,l, mat ill '''■"■'""""'J-' 111'' Mini ,,r va i„ ,|,s|,(.t.. in cilM'H ol a|,|Hal l.v a .irlnwlan!. ll,c pi-,.,„.r rciirH.. was to I.k.K- at ||„. aiM.,iiMi (;„• w|,i,.|, !|„. I ''c'lai-atKai (•.uirhiclrs ami not at the u; i„| ,,f tli.Mihl-.iMMt. J,,,/,r A Jl„rl, I S. (;. It,.,,. ;!^1, oil. 1 t. I o77. XX. Ok VicK-Aii.MiiiAi.rv Ciiiiit. 5'). Wli(.|.(. iiMiiliitc. n.,|,iin.,| tli(M..\(.,.iiiioii .,1 ft Hamiiit (p|. |,ni|.(.ss iiii,|,.r an ,,ni(.|. ,,r t\v(, jiMKM'H ,,| till. iM.ac.. tor H(.ani..|i'H wiu'cn to Im' millinri/.,.,! hv tlH.jn.|«,.or the V Aiiniinilty (oiiil- //,/-/ iliat till. ..|ia..lni..nt ; ,»,.s(.,l ni...ii til" <'rUu\ Mot inn ill ArrcHt of Jiuliiment. ^iw Trial. ()/i/i(iii i,f Trial III/. Itiijlil III, ly. Jn Clil.MlNAI, CaSK.S. V. LiAiiii.iTV TO Skrvk on. HI. In Civil, Ca.sk.s. .')7. .JinJijK., C/iai!/e.-~]u aihlresKiii.- the j„rv H' J.Mlse has a ri^zht to^ivo his opinion np,,, tlie wlioli. ,.a.s,..altlioii«li tli.. jury uiV th,. ...xiln- Mv.. .)ii,|.,..s „f thefiu.ts. Jiai/,e v. Procincial In.wranre Co., 21 L. C. ,1. 27-1, S. C. 1877 M. Jii,hjii,niifii-ini, F.irh fur Jitrij cannot he hscnhcl u, J{,r,eu,-yUu„> l.y phiiniitr. to reji.0 iii.scviptioii iiia.i<.l,v,l(.f(.ii,Iantsfor review on the Broil ml that tlie .in.L-nieiit in not o„e ^■u.^a.p^i,le of review. The "order eoniplaine.i was one (i.xing and .leliniiig the fact.s to he submitted to tlie jury to bo .suininoiied in the (;aiiHe- -//./,/, (hui „liil.. there mighi he an 'iH"al, then, eeriainly was no rii-ht ,,f r..vi,.w. /""'',""./■''/"■'■"""""'.'/ ''" •■'. Caiia.lit Uiiar- an/., ro...l I,. N. 77, s. C. |{, |hhO. M. M„li„l, ill ,),.,.,.,,/ ,;/-,/,„/,^„„,„/_^^ |. I'lnt Mi,.d iVHpondent Cor t»m, unioiint of a !■ 'Iic.v ol in-iiian.-e on his prop,.rtv. and oh- ""•"■'I a venliet of *i;i)|). |(,..p„nd"ent v.'d 111 iirr.-i ,,( ind;jrii,ent lor a vari.tv of .r,-,,,,,,,!., , lil "ann^riipoi, the ill,.i.'alitv and' ii,>n'ili,.|,.,„.; "I Hm. ,.vhl,.|,|.,. addiK.,.,| i,v ihe ai.p..|lanl. The liiolH.i, u..-n,ade helorelh,. H„|„.ri,„. Cnin ul .^lH.rhn„,|(e on I2lh N,,v<.inher, 1.^78, hein.r ||,„ sei'iMid ,|ay of the term n..,xt alt.r Ihe v..nhrl lwoothe,.noti,t,.sof inolioi, were „erv..d at Ih..' Miii.<.tiiii..oniheapp..|lai,l,iheoiM.aiiH,lion for "'"■",'';'"'"'"'"! '"■ii"""li"iiloriii.|«i„e„i '>^<<'''^l'"f nrchclu, ,„ he p,...H..nt,.,| a. the iie.vl HlKlML'H ol the Coiii-i of |{ev„.w at .Monlival. III.. parti,.s having l„.|.n heard 0,1 lh,. (ir-.t " '". llie,.oiin an-.si,.,! jndgnient with .■■,.|m 't'liin.-t .•.pp..|lai,t-//,./,/, ihal under An. 12.'! of ni.. (-0,1.. ,,( |>roe.<..|iin., as ani..|ide,| i,v (J :;.-, \i';..'iip.ls'aii,l Art. .121 ol the .same Co,|e, all molioiiM |,,i. a ii,.w trial, li.r .ji.dgm..nl non oh. .v^/»/,- , •,.,.,.,/„./,,, H,,,i,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.j, I, I I"' niade heloi-e thive judges Kitii,,. ni Review aiMl not in lh,. .Superior Coini. Flrlr/m- .fe .yialnal hrc fnsnrancr ('„ fo, Shnisl,;,,! \ S/.rr. W.YlL.N, ll.^.U<.^lt.|{.|77,(.2.ii.lKs|. M>. Aii.l iiisiilli,;ieii,.y and dleL'ahtv of evid- en,.,. are not gnmnd.s li,- arri'sl of jndgii,..|,|. /h. •-I. W /,.„/.-riK. ph^„„,|f ,„„,,,j „„. oiirtol K,.viewlora new trial, all..;.,,,., that he liad l„.e|. iion-siiit,.,i hy iin.sake. Th.. liiels we'-<' lliat the plaintill and his coiii,..el were .'lH,.|,tat the lime Hie <;a..e was .:all..d. That I ,e.niry „■,.,•,. i„.v,.rthel,..ss put 11, the U,x and HMi'iM. hat , luring this pro,:e,.dii,g the i,l„in- "11 liim.self ..liter..,!, and lin.lin- the ,uise ealled w..|itoiitlo Dol< lor Ins counsel. That the c.i-e '"■mg again ealled, neither plaintiif nor Inn coiiiisel were Ibiiml nre.sent. 'i'hat the eouil tiieieiipon „nler..,l jii,lgiiie,i( of „„„ ^„n ,,^„.. v ><'■ /lourroir u, l„. eiit..r,.d, and the.jnrv wr.. dis- misH..d-//,./,/, ,h,u ,),, c„„,, „|.|i,,^,;^.,^. ,,^^,, ^^^^ power to int..rlm. and giant a new trial. Jiain V. fUiitc, 2 L. N. :!:io. ,s. c. r 1,87., <-2. Ojilioii „f Trial /-y.-Tl... ease was in- s|'nl.,.d .„, ihe/vy/,; loren,,uele and ii„.rits, hi„1 t ied,.|eii,laiits in„ved Ihatlhe ii.s,:riplioii he li... '■i'lf'lTremilar and ,lis.diarg,.d, inasinu,;h a., iliey ha.I mad." opii,,i, „f ^al l,y jnrv The l;l^';iilill res,.s„.d the application on th,.g,-oniid tliat Ihere liiul l„.,.|, no compliance with Art. •'friO of Ihe Co,leof I'ro,H.di nnhaiice ef— //,/,/, thai the 'ol'lhis ilefendaiits "onls in defendants' pleas put tliei,i.-.elv..s upon ii,e country" were a .sulli,.|<.nt o|,ti,,n of trial hy j,„.^.. (jilniau v. /'"»,/„//, ,i L. X. 85, S. C. 1880. r«v,/„./„ ,„„s, I,.. „,a,,,. i,„,,„.,.„„^ SM,, .r or '« r "m IS ill l{<.v,L.w, ,,„ „r b,.fv„.p ii„. .„,,,,„„| ,1 1 [,, ,1,, \," ■ , .1,? ..f -'..■ch..|il „^.s, l,jl|„„.i„K tin. full, .lay , 4 " th,. e ; ..ni.Ror tl„. v,,.r,ii.t, .,,,,1 cann„t b,. roc!i ' 1 aft 'r 4'' f T, .■ "^'''''^.'i'''^'' liy '•I 3' Vic. cap. ,i, kM.13 the pi,.,.,.., „r l>y a specl,.! ap|,lic,ili„n to the c,mi t w ii, ."^.".^''t"" !";•'• l-"';.J"i>"'/, "r it tli,.,. tour ,l,',v,I )lv " < 11 .,f (.TFn I !„• application may I,., ii„i,i,. „„ ,h,-. |j,-,t ,l,,r oMlienext teim, proviileil notice be Kiven tu th, o,,, o "iteimrty wiiliii, four Hays att,.r i°»ue jolaid fZre" H 1.0 art ci.lati ,f facLs ihe in.scrintio ,i,Muin t uke place until live .lays alter issue juiiicU 360 (J Cl" "^l; ^f 436 JURY. V. LlADII.ITV TO SkRVE on.* f)"). A ppr.xon owning proi)<>rty to tlip aM'o>(«P(| vnlup ()ri:i,OO0, iitid wliosc iinrnc in inHcrilx'.l (in • Hv Qiin. 44-Ki V'ln rnn. 10, tin- l»w rp^iKvUnir lurom umlJiirl.H (Ti V'lo. call, -i'i) U ntn-nicd nn.l r.>|ilii(''(..| h, munv ImpiirlRtit |jnillnilBr<, m rci'spiiciftllv with i. ifunl In tlip«iiinmiiiili:nor Jiinrx and (ho urocc.luru relntlna tUi'reto. Ku. " ('|>iirntp diirinu' tlip procrriM of tlic triiii. und ulii'i-p siicli Hcpi\riilion tiiUcs pliicp it ih i\ toi"- triiil.nnij throoiirt nun liv iln jiii|j;..,(|ir.'(>t ijmt till' piirty cnTivii'tcil lip tripil H'.'uin iv if no Iriiil IiikI licpn Imil in siioli cn-p. Rniiiiit v. Ih-rriik 2 L.N. 211, A 2.1 I,. C J. 2:i!t, Q R. IST'I ' C ,S. L. 0. cup. 77, HP.! i;;i, A ;12 k .tl Vic. ciii).' 2!), Hpc, ,'i7. JliaTTCRH OP TKK T'EAOR. m tliP list of pptit jurors, iininpt from Hcrvin;;, cvpii tlioiii;li his nmni' \n fmnil lilno on ||,"! L'riiiiil jiiiv list Mclilihe in re, 7 U. L. ;n,-,, .irsTirKsoF Tir ErKACK. I. .liiiisiiinioN- or. f'f). On I) petition to HPt ftsi,|p II (v>nvi('tion fir iluiniii.'P(|oii,. to II wimrt, it ii|ippiirpi| tliil i|,e procppijiii;;^ ,v,.r(. ||,|,| l„.(;,r,. two jnstiiM's nl' tl,,. ppiicp who. Iipiiij»i|ivl(|i>i| in o|iinion, nillpil \n n thinl.wiio, with iincnfihcotliprs ncnrri'ij inn I'niivictioii --//,•/'/, thiit no jnriHilictioii lnid I,,.,.,, shown in tin- jn-ticps (mry ilipcasp, uihI niun- ovpr noiinthorily hml ln'p'n shown liir iIip rii;lit oftliPtwojiisHci's whoilillpreil in opiniun tonill in II thiiii. AV//// it lichiiKjer, 2 L. N. 3;iJ, .S. ('. L. SUMMARY OF T r T L K S . Paoe L.\n()RRRS 4:i7 L.VDING 437 I-'VXD ,.' 487 L.AVnLOllD AND TENANT 4.17 i^APSR 4,.,7 LATENT DEFECTS 4.'?7 LAW 437 LAWS .n{7 LAWYER.S 4:{;^ LAWYER'S LETTERS 4;i8 LEASE 4;j,H LEATHER 440 LEGACY 4n LEGATEES 441 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY 442 LEGISLATURES 4.-,4 LESION '. ,54 LE.S.SOR AND LESSEE 454 LETTERS OF ATTORNEYS 4r,7 LETTERS OF CREDIT ,, 407 Pare LETTERS PATENT j,;; LEVEL OF S TREETS .(dj i^i'^vis ■,■■.'. tiW LIABILITY 4(;h LIi5EL AND SLANDER m LICENSE LAW i--i LICITATION 475 LIEN ■ ' 4,.;, LIEN DEDROri' 475 LIFE INSURANCE m LIGHTS 47,; LIQUID MEASURE 475 LOAN 475 LOCAL LEGISL.VTURES ., 4:7 LODGI.VG-HOUSE KEEPERS 477 LODS ET VE^^TES .m LO.SS AND DAM.'VGE 478 LOTTERY 47S LUGGAGE 47S TTE PEACR, m hIio iMNiiriiniofii"! m 'Xi'riipt Criprn wPMiii;, t'liiriil uIho (III ii,,. //( n; 7 It. L. ;h,"., B- i I E T'EACE. ■rivi(itinn llir I ii(i|icitr('i| tlril llip ■ two jlIxticcM 111' till. V.\ri(»'.V '''''"''''' '^' "'■"" "*' ^"'*'*f'i'N,.w 'HON ^' ^^ '"^' "^' '''■'' '■'■'^ "'"'■"*■' •»«« KXKCU- LATENT DEFECTS. I. AcTio.N KOK, .vee ACTION Ueduiuitory. LAW. VI LAWS. I. CoNKMCT OK JJktwkkn Dikkkhkxt Pro- Stai STrfv'" ""^ ««.'^'-Under the Imp. btat. U & 2.t Vic. cat). «;{, ,„ nnv cnse dcpen I- nj,'inai,y cmrt wit .in Her Majc.tv's Domin- ons,it t.io law applicable t„ ti.e liicts „r 1 e case iH the; law a,i„iiniHtere,l in aiiv otlier pa t the lawot llie place in which the court is situate, it IS competent to the court in which fiuch action ,s pemlin. .., ,i,,,et a ca'et he prepare,! Khowmg the tiicts, ami to he remitleil for re erence to the Superior Court ailniiiiilter- lag the law applicable to the fac's of the ca^e M,l cii^siriiisr .such court to pronounce its opin- ion u,M,n tlR. ,,uestionR siihii.itte.i. iXoad v NomI, 21 L. C. .1. ;^12, S. C. 1874. 2. And such case is hroufrht helbre the court whone opiiiion upotj the law applicable to the epai les lu the action p ,ivi„jr thecourt to hear t^e parties or tli.ir counsel, and to pronounce iu opinion upon the questions submitted. 76. LEASK. 438 wii'u'^"' '"''''•'!':". 'I"" lli<- interpretati f llie le.itiitor. Ih. LA W V EHS-Scc A D V( )(; ATES. r. Siion.n viiT.jivK KviiiKNci.; in ritKiH mvs- (.AHKs, ,,e AlTOUNKV.s .vi) IdTK.M. I-AWYEirs LETTKKS. I. FlK KOIl. 4. An ailvocalP is entitled to mid (,, ,|,,, Hmountolai. uetiiintb,. ,i uallv eh ii'.,',. . I.EASE-Sce LESSOR AND LlvS.SEE. '■ Airi:ii.\Tiov oi.'. II. Kmi'iivtkitic. II). ^J'-iiikohTkhmixationok. IV. Kksimation or LhiiKn!'""' "' 1''"<'"ASKU OK PUOPKUTV yi. 'SlllI.KASK. vlii ',;V'"' liWONI'll-IION- OF. \ III. I IK.MI.NATIOX OK. IX, Willi PKO.MISK OK Sai.K. I. Al.TERATlON OK. allv into a CO nal I repe sum ex pi the run Where a lease ,s so mdified as to materi- aitertliecoiitract.ashy clian-i,,.' the rent »"underlalr the action. They alleged that the dee.^ ni'l-ollant wanted to set aside %as not a .si„ pTe lease, and CDnsennrntly th' .-. .-.i e ,ii 1 ' , come under the JrovisLs o. .!; CoX e p-l^u |.u; jcssors and lessees. The Superior (Ct adopted thBt view in conformity with Lepine : I .!|« 439 LEASE. LEATHER. and the Jncqne.i Cartiev Ihiihlinr, Socie/,/*— JIM, that tlio leasi^ „as riol an ■einphvl.'.iitic k'im; but nii oniinai-y lease for a luiii' term of years, wlucliconveye,! no riglit of pmnertv in t le in.nioveable.s lease,!, an,l iliut oonsemientlv lioliitdilh; 9 K. L. 420, Q. H. l,S7(i. 7. Ill an action on a lease (or nine years— //,■/rtts, but without specifying a term— Held, that the plaintitls could not by termin- atiii'' the contract as to services put an eml to s c ''iT'1872'''"' '■ ''''"'"'' " ^' ^" ^^' •^"'' , 15. A. iier.son who is surety for a tenant hold- ing under a lease terminable on givm.' si.x months' notice cannot e.\e re ise the n^lit .snpii- laled m favor of the tenant if the latter fails to do so. Leonard ic Lemieux, 1 L. N. 614, S. C. 1878, IX. With Pro.misk op Sale. 10. An action under a lease with promise of sale IS a personal action, and iiny be brought 111 the le,-sor and lesseocourl. Meitzien \.BdL i L. N. loy, S. C. 1880. LEATHER. I- Sta.mi'ing of, see INSPECTION LAW. 441 LEGATEES. LEGACY-See WILLS. I. Rights of Leuatek. 17. The antenr of the (icfcmiant hv liis will instituted Ins wife hm universal le-atee in usn- fnict, iimi Ills (!liil,ii-en liis iiniversui le>'atees en pi-<,pn,:U- He also made a particular %';xay bywiiicli l,e li.Miueatiied to his brotlier, the ,le- (endaiit, a piece of land situated at St. A.'atlie and admitted to he of the value of IjSiJOn The plaiiititl, a creditor of the deceased, ohtained jiidjriiienla^ranist his widow, as well in her own nmne as tutrix to her children, for a Mim of fl.-i.i, interest and costs; and not heiiiL' able to realize anythini; under it iirousrht aeti.jii a-aiiist t le particular legatee to compel him to abandon the immovealile bequeathed to him for the beneht of the creditors of the succession, and narticiilarly of plaintiff. DefeiMant pleaded that lie luvl made certain improvements to the im- moveable to the extent of $150, and asked that the plamtilf be first ordered to pav him that Buin, and that failing to do so his action be dis. missed. In the Superior Court the action was dismissed according to the terms of the plea, but mappeal-7/,W, that the right of retention Ibr i.nproyemeuts in such a case .iid not arise from Art. 419 of the Civil Code* on which .lefendani relieii, hut that there was a privilege onlv on the price acconiiug to Art^2072.t Mnfte v. laroche, .«• the plaintiff" .s mother having died left a will by which she bequeathe,! to plaintiff a legacy of SI 00, and to her sister $;{00 The sister havmig died bequeathed iier legacv to plaintiff. Ihe legacies were to be paidoii't of the estate as soon as tlie incumbrances on it were paid. Ihe brother of plaintiff having taken po.s.se.ssionofthe estate sold to anotiier sister a portion of It for $25,000, on which were certain niortgage.s \yhich the purchaser undertook to pay. t5he also undertook to pay tlie le^^acies in question, and her undertaking was accepted bv Plaintiff. On action lor the amount of the two legacies-y/e/,7, that she could not plead the existence of the niortgage.s nor yet set up in com- pen.sation that she had maintained and educateii the chddren of the deceased sister. Go,>,/l,odu V. MvGral/i, 2 L. N. 165, S. C. 1879. LEGATEES. :tion law. I. FiDIClAUV. II. LlAlllMTV OF. To Acciiuut, UI) ti), , mm™, ' '"""'^ '", r""'?"^'"" i« forced to Rlvp "iVht tn ,." n ,1 "* '•'"""^■'1 ''> »"• reimbursed, lie lin« a t"'r,ivm .,''■""'■"■" '", ''■' """■'""'al reccirse to ol,. 11 npaynicni ...ivinpr the caso of surrenJer in anv 1, t" l'«"''^>,./,':' "" "'''';'',;' ^'r"'»"y I"»vl,led .0 '^^ Tllm holder iiiiiiinat wliom tlie liypotlitcarv action U „!■. '"'."™ r''',' t" make be suliject '» his priviieae of be wiu;'';'!;'/'!,:!' V'-^'';'' '''•'^^'•y •''''''••'"■ "'I'' '!« i"^^^^ HI the rul'scohfainud in tlm title ul owner.fhiu diiil u!^ldS:'^2«o'c^ •'- ""y «■'«•"" «"<=" expeudiVJ'Zw''e"'.! LEGISLATIVE AUTIIOKITY. 442 PVrnS.r^tTJr'"^' '"■' J^'DO-^'K^-'T AGAINST, See IV. Rkjuts of. I. FiniciARv, 19. ir/(owc.— Where.by a will, certain bond.s were bwiueathed to a person " to be used for the Hipport of his laniily," it was /iel>/, that the laniily was the real legatee, and he was a le-a- tee in trust. Xuid v. Noml, 21 L. C. J. .■!12, i5. C. 1S74. 20. And /iphl, ahso, that if he was misu-in"' the trust, the family could demand a seiiuestra"- tioii. [/,. ' 21. But that the trustee liad the right to ilc- posit the bonds or their proceeds in the hands ol aiieposil.ary, who was bound to return the same on the order of the trustee, and that lie could not be held liable for breach of trust, even though he knew of the nature of the trust and the terms of the will, unless fraud and collu- sion were proved. I/j. U. LlAlUI.ITV OF. 22. Universal legatees under a will who have not renounced are bound to pay the debts of the -e.stator, notwithstanding he mav have ap- pointed executors whom he vested' with all his estate. Beaadry v. RoUaml, 22 L. C ,f 72 23. Arrears of taxes due bv a deceased person arc properly recoverable from his universal VtvH ?rrr'{"'\.':-f' ^'""'"■^•/"/' «/ Acton ^.u ",'/' -'} '^- C"^' 113, S. C. R. 1879. I „,. . /; Acrount—ln an action to account ap list the legatee.^ of a tutor deceased— 7/<'/./, tiiat legatees who accept a succession i.urely ■uid simply may be .sued for a debt of the testa- tor, notwithstanding that the testator may have named executors in whose hands the estate still IS at the time the action is instituted. I'inre& ^J^',/'r,,3L. N. 28. & 24 L. C. J. 1G7, ti B 2j But where an account has been remlered ly tlie tutor, his representatives cannot he sued tor a second until the first is declared null. lb. IV. Rights of. er.?,tA """'■'■"ct'mry legatee may enforce a CO itract between the testator and another, and a Ueleii.se of want of privity of contract will be i cTiti, i'^'^;:77: """• '■ '^"'^'"'"' '' LEGISLATIVE AUTHOIUTY. L Division of bktwken r EUEKAL LkgISLATUHES. Ill Commercial Matters. In Covjinration Matters. Ill Vrimiiial Matters. Ill In.-i,dc, III Mutters. In Judicial Matters. In Mailer.; ./' Interest. Ill Matters of Naviijalion. THE Local a.\u 11 l^> I 443 LKGI8LATIVE AUTHORITY. In Mii/Zerx ^»erdal M„Uer!l.-'Y\^e License Actol (jiielieo is cdnstitutionaL Duncan exp. & M''''^>l'<>l'fVoJ the County ofli'romc, 21 L. C. J. lt}l, fi. (j. ]8i 7. 30. And the License Act of Quebec, in so far as It pretends to restrain the sale of liquor, and especially ,n imposing .as a penalty imprison- nient wuli liani lahor, is unconstilutional. « n Tw-i; ^">T">-atlon of Quebec, 9 li. L. 531, 31. And in anotlier case, the plaintift" beincr the revenue inspector tor the district of Artha'^ a"!.* n*^'-n^'" **?''''" "'"'''■■ "'"^ ^'"''"'C License Aot (8,0) lor thepenalty imposed by that Act for ,H-llir,g bv auction without a license against one of the delendaiits, an oflicial assignee for causing the sale ' v auction of the estate of an insolvent, a.i.i against the olher defemlant, as having a.'tually conducted the said sale, n( ither Imvmg obtained a license as required bv said Acl~JteM, tiiat t/ie Li.^olveiit Act of 1809, be- ing exciiiMVidy concerned with commercial na ers cjuld not be restraineii in its operation bv the Quebec Legislature, and that, therelbre, the License Act of Qu, bee, in so far as it pre- tended to limit the powers of the assignees in carrying out their functions under (he Act, was «/(/•« r/;r.v and void. Cot,lv. Jh(/,vo«, 3 Q. L. H. 32. /'«.• Curiam. '—ThtH is a petition in the naine of the attorney general of the Province, under the yi)7th article of the Code of Proce- tl^ which reproduced the Statutes previously * JolllJiiOIl, J, LEGISLATIVJ] AUTHORITY. 444 in force respecting proceeiiings against ooriwi- alions violating or exceeding their powers, an,l against persons uMir|,ing public otti,;es ; and t he object is 10 set asi,le as illegal a bvlaw of this city, being No. 90, concerning ' private butchers stalls. I may .'^av at the outset that 1 huil some doubts whether the principal point raised here could eome up properlv in this man- ner IJie I2(h Vic. c. 41, repiXHluceil in the Code, was passed before our present poliiicul system was in existence, and it relate,! to the re, ress to lie had against corporations or indi- viiiual.s (or mi.-iCon,iuct in rt;,pect to excess of power in tlie Hirmer,and intrusion into office bv the latter. Tlie excess of power complaineil of here seems to be not tliat the corporation exceedeil the powers professeillv given theni; but that they have exercise,! powers wrongly j-'iven ; in other words, that the L,)cal Legisla- ture ha,! no ri.'lit to give the powers that liave been used, and this proceeiiing is iherefbre an attack on tlie Statute, an,l not on the bvlaw an,! most a.ssuredly tlie 12lh Vict, had lui such' object: nor does the Coile go anv further than the Statute, nor ,iid it come into force after con- lederation ; but though I have no iloulit that such a thing was never contemplated bv the .Malute or l,y the Co,!e, vet I am clear also that tlie w,,rds both of the Statute and of the Code embrace the present case, for the remedv is given inter alia, " Whenever am/ cor|iorauon exercises any power, franchise or 'privilege that doe.s not belong to it; " an,l tlie effect of these words, whetlier contemplate,! or not, is to sub- ject the by-law to examination with reference to everything that adects the power of the cor- poration to pass it. Tlierefore I come at once to consider the principal gn.unil o( this appli- cation, whicli is that "le Hritish North Am- erica Act of 1867 confe/s the exclusive power to regulate trade an,! commerce upon the i-edera! Parliament, and tliat this bv-law, beiii.' profes.sedly passed umler the authoVitv of I'rc^ viiicial Lpgislation, is a violation and an excess of power. It is verv true that section 91 ,jf the Impei-ial Act of 18(i7 lioes ,letine the powers of the tceral Parliament, an,! in these wor,ls ; It shall be lawful, etc., to make laws for the peace, order and gtjod government of Cana.la 111 relation to all matters nut comini/ within the classes of subjects by iliis Act assigned exclii- ."ively to tlie Legislatures of the Provinces; " Iherelore before tliis subject can l)e said to be witlim the jurisdicfion of the Fe,leral Parlia- uiem. It must be sli(..wn : Isf, that power to make laws (or Cana,!a (that is for the Domin- ion) IS power to make laws for the local jnir- posesot the Provinces; and seconillv, that it IS a power not assigned exclusively to tlie Legis- latures of the Provinces. Neither of lhe.se pro positions 18 true. The trade and commerce of the nonunion is a very distinct thing from the inilividual trades or callings of persons sub- ject t,) the municipal government of cities; and the exclusive power of the Provincial Legislatures is specifically extemled bv section J^ to make laws " in relation to municipal insti- tutions, an,l also in relation to shop, saloon, tavern, auctioneer, and other licen.ses, in order to the raisin- of a revenue (or provincial, locai or iiiunicipal purix).ses." Tlierefore tlie coriwr- ation by this by-law have neitlier interfered JTIIORITY. 444 Mgs against c.or\xn- ig tlioir poweiv, and |iiitilic otKceH ; aii'l ilicgiil u hy-liiw of Cdiiceriiiiij; privale V at tlie outset iliat tli;' ])i'iiiciiiiil point roperly in this nian- , repnxliiWMl in (lie ir present ixjliticill in\ it relateii to the oi'poralions or iridi- 'j.-;pe(;i to exue.-s of rusion into ofiice hy ower coniphiined of it the corpiiralioii sedly given thein; ed powers wrongly . tiie Local Legisla- ' poweis tliat have ing is therefore an not on the hy-laiv, Vict, had no such ) any furtiier ti)an n(o force after cori- ave no doulit that iteiiiplaled by the am clear also that e and of the CixJe 'or the remedy is r an;/ corpora'iion le or privilege that the effect of these 1 or not, is to siih- 1 with reference to power of the cor- )re 1 come at once mid ol this apph- Iritisli North Ani- e exclusive power nierce upon the this by-law, being authority o( I'ru- ion and an excess .t section 91 of the tine the powers of 1 in these words: iiake lawH for the nment of Canada omiiif/ witiiui the ;t assigned exclii- ' the Provinces; " ;aii be 8aid to be ! Federal I'arlia- I, that power to 8 for the Doiniti- br the local ))ur- secondly, that it vely to the Legis- therof these pro- aiid commerce of ;t tiling (rom the of persons sub- iiiient of cities; the Provincial etided by section )ninnicipal insti- to shop, saloon, licenses, in order provincial, local •elbre the corpor- eitlier interfered 445 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. with the trade of the Dominion, nor exercised right of he Prov.ncial Legislature to give them, llie by-law is based upon section 12:i of the ■il and ,^2. 1 he 2nd paragraoh of this section gives the general power to matce bv laws for the liealth, internal economy and local government °lt l"'-I- ''r'^^^Pl' 27 gives power to make by-laws "to establish and re.r„|atp C" '."I'r''^" ?"'' P'"'^''^*'' butch.rs- or liuck- tl esale n-'r' "!"' '° "'''^''^^'^> license or restrain irL-u! ""Ti'' "''^}'' v'-f^etables. fish or other articles usually sold on marke.s." Paragraph ai authorizes by-laws for the purpose of regu- lating where and how live stock and provisions mav be exposed for sale on the publi,; markets, and specially provides that "the said council mav, if they deem it advantageous, bv a bv-law to be passed tor that purpose, empower anv person to sel, offer or e.^iose for sale, in any place beyond the limits of the said markets, meet, vegetables and provisions usually bon-'ht and ao.,i on public markets, upon such person obtaining a license lor that purpose from the said council, for which he shall pay to the City treasurer such sum as may be fixed by Buch by-law, and by conforming with the rules and regulations contained in the said bv-law " Section 8 ot^^the Charter, using the power If",^/.^''^ 92',d section of the ]i. N. Ainerica Act, 1807, makes no distinction between the lonii of a tax and that of a license. It says ; llie said council mav also, if tliev see "(it impose the said tax in the form of "a license! payable annually at su.di time and under such conditions and restrictions as the said cmncil n-.ay , letermii.c.'; The power, then, appears to have been constitutionally given by the Provin- cial 1 arliament, and properly used by the corporation. As to the argument that this was virtually a prohibition of trade, it need only be observed that it is merely a prohibition ol'un- licensed trade, the power to license bein" clearly eiven. The amount appears bv the evidence to be much less than one-half ofwhat was loinierly imposed; nor could I properly consMer the amount, where there isno specilic Imut in the law' Dillon, on Municipal Corpor- ations, p. 198, No. 79, says :-" Where there is a clear intent that licenses are imposed as a source ol revenue to the city, the court will not mind the amount." The.-e municipal powers, and their exercise, are to be liberally inter- preted. See Dillon, p. 440, No. ;!5;i, 250 and 2j1, aii.l in note, the dictum of Chief Justi.^e p. 372 ; 1 Wil'ock, No. :m, and Grant on Cor- porations, p. 88. This is il,P whole of .;,e case as far as it presents any legal nuest,>n ; and my judgment IS tliat the petition bedismis.sed with costs lor the reasons I have I'iven At- torney General v, Ci/i/ of Montreal,^. C. 187(i .«. Petitioner applieni for a writ of certiorari rom a conviction of the police magistrate lijr Having =cid a dozen bottle.s of beer at one time without having previously obtained a license to do .so in terms of the Quebec License Act, on the ground viier alia that the conviction was null and void, and beyond the jurisdiction of the police magistrate, because the Quebec Acts upon wliich alone the conviction reposes, were LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. 446 ultra rires of il,e Quebec Provincial Le-isla- t'lre, and unconstitutional so far as allectin.' wholesale dealers, and, again, because the said Acts are m regulation of trade, and therefore n/tra vires ol the Quebec Legislature. The prosecutor relied upon siib-section 9 of section J2 01 the B. N. A Act, by which in each l^rovmce the Legislature "may exclusively make laws in relation to matter.-, comiinr within the classes of subjects next hereinafl.T enumerated, that is to say :-9, shop, .saloon, tavern, auctioneer and other licenses in order o the raising of a revenue for provincial, local, or municipal purposes." Per Cariam.' I liold that the \i. N. A. Act must be inter- preted as any oiher.stalule. The whole of it must be considered, and if possible Ibrce must be given to each clause of it. Though the nine y-hrst .section reads as it does the next one has been enacted Why ? surely not to conllict with the preceding one ; but, presumably, to work with It. I think it a qiialilication of it : as the ast .statute in point of time controls .so ater causes are heM to qualify earlier ones; the last clause is the last expression of the law maker. Cannot sub-section ninelv-two be work- ed without violei.je against ninetv-one ? I think that It can. Ninety-one being enacted, Jj expre.s.ses a particular intention, in the nature of an exception to it. It is said to be repue- iiant ; no more so than would have been a pro- viso to the same ertect. Ninety-one gives the IJ.'iiiinion the regulation of conimerce in the wide .sense, but ninety-two allows Quebec t'rovinceto make certain regulations attectin^ purely internal commerce. The QueU'c Le.ris" lature does not, as I understand, pretend to're- guiate the trade and commerce of the Dominion; it may concede to the Dominion, exclusively tne right to "regulate trade and commerce'" in the wide sense, and yet claim to have ri.'lit. towards raising revenue for provincial piirpu^ses to lay taxes on shops, saloons, tavern.s and auctioneers and others. The Dominion Parlia- ment has no power todo C/i«/,but clearly, I think, power to do It has been conceded to Quebec t^rovince by section ninety-two, and all that is necessary to enable the power to be exercised with effect must be heM to have been conced- ed. Quebec Province would in vain tax slums and taverns, unless sales otherwise than under icenses(such a .sale, for instance, as Ln-eiUi lias miyle ol a dozen bottles of beer) cuuld be or.lered by it to expose to penalties. Who would pay lor a shop or tavern license if he ct)uld sell beer without one, and expose himself to no pen- a y / "Power to regulate commerce is not at all like that to lay taxes. Power to lay taxes may wel be concurrent. Each (that is Con- gress and any of the Slates) mav lav a tax on he same prtiperty ; yet without interli-ring with the other. bo says Story. It was meant to be so here, in a degree, I think. If the Quebec iiicen.se Act lie so unconstitutional as petitioner claims. It IS strange that the Governor-General has not disallowed it. When the Quebec Le-iH- ature, using the powers given to it bv nine'tv. two, exceeds, I make no doubt the Dominion trovernmeiit will iiiterlere, It is not lor me, m III II • Mackay , J. 447 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. disposing of the present case, to.iefinc tlie oxiict boundanes o( tlie power of the Qiielwc Le^isla- tnre laxing under ninelv-two. Tiie ijowerto tax, t'.V means of a system of licensing', exists j tliat isoerlam. Within what iKMindaries can I sav that this power is uhrid-e,!, where and when fioes the power to tax end? It has limits ; at any rate, itM.nght to have ; hnt what are tiiev exactly I he Quehec Lefiislature has .rone. In "■.n-,|,s, to the extent of prohibiting i^ale whole- sale of spirits and heer, except hv shop or tavern licensed persons, without distinction of Jiquors imnorted in Imlk, sold in Imlk as im- ported, and other liqiu.rs, e.g., nmnufactured in Wiiebec Province, and sold here. Ninety-two does not read to prevent them insistin".' on Jicenses bein« taken to sell liquors wholesale Ml'. Justice Strong would hold a license which would amount to prohibition to be an undue in- terference with the exclusive powers of the IJominion Parliament, and I couM a-ree to hold tlie same thiiifr. I ,lo not see that lie can com- plain with reason that the Quebec Legislunu-e Jias exceeded and abused its powers as re<'aids Jiim in tlie present case. CVd^ran quashed. ■LereilUexp., S. C. 1877. .34. S., after the passing of the Act, O. 37 V ic. can. .32, entitled, " An Act to amend and consolidate the law for the sale of fermented or spirituous liquors." then bein^' a brewer licen- se;! !iy the Government of Canada, under c. .31 V IC. cap. 8, for the manufacture of fermented, spirituous or other liquo.s, did manufacture large quantities of beer, and did sell bv whole- sale tor consumption vrithin the Province of V'ltario a lar<;e quantity of said ferniente.i Jiquorsso manufactured "by him without first obtaining a license as required by the said Act of the Legisl^ative Assemblv of the Province ,,f Ontario. The Attorney General of Onfario tlierenpon hied an information tor penalties against S. On demurrer to the information tlie special matter for argument was tiiat the 1-egislature of the Province of Ontario had no power to pjiss tiie statute under wiiich the pen- alties were souirht to be recovered, or to reouire brewers to take out aiiv license •.vhatever for eelliiiir fermented or malt liqimrs by wholesale as Btatal 111 the information.— //,.A/." that the Act Of the I rovincialLefiislature of Ontario ;i7 Vic, cap. Al was not within the Leiiislative capacity of that Let'islature, and that the power to tax ainl re ulate the trade of a brewer beinj; a restraint ami regulation of trade and commerce falls within the class of subjects reserved by the !)lst section of the British North America Act Ibr tlie exclusive letrislative aiilhority of the Par- liament of Canada, and that the license imposed was a restraint ami regulation of trade and com- inerceaiiil not the e.xercise of a f.ol ice power. tiee>rn& liegiiia, 2 .S. C. Rep. 70, .Su. Ct. 1878. .iJ. And the right conferred on the Provincial Legislatures by ss. 9, sec. i)2, of the said Act to deal exclusively with shop, saloon, tavern, auc- tioneer and "otiier licenses" does not extend to licenses on brewers, or "other licenses" which are not of a local or municipal character. 10. 36. And where the Ontario Legislature passed an Act Ibr the regulation of Fire insurance Com- panies cany ing on business in that Province, en- titlef, ISo & 24 L. c. J. i,,:j^ p ^ j^^y -13 //, C,7w,«„; J/„//,.,..s.._The power-, oon- ferre,! on the Corporation of Montrea by tZ Actof theJ'rovinceof Qiieliec .32 Vic, can 70 .'J'^'- 17, to inflict ciMMiilative piini,-hnieit as therein enacte,) are unconstitu ional. /W« xm^i ''■^^' * ^^ ''• ^- •'■ ;^i W 4t. The petitioner was imprisoned bv the ai. jiayeii or release on the {rroiimi that tin' Malute creating, the office of tire conn,,-", er as"r'::Marni''"^"'''"'''';^''°''^«'-'"^-'-^' bv he ? "■'".""''' Proceilnre, which rZ.^.e '•'''! ••^'«'""<;'"q"^-^tion had no ?! . . '.'':''!"nMal procedure, and was per- Q IJ^. I'l^'i'^",'""^'^"'-''- ^^'■'••"" e-iy., 2 R. C. 231, Fir \ '. ''•*',"'« ^"'^titiuion of the court ot to (was within the competencv ,.f the I'n.vin- cial Legislature, lir,,inUc.oU, L. K.4 'p C. 4(; The Provincial Leirislature ),as iuris.Iic- ot penal acts enacted within its power.s and law as contei.ipated by the British North ^J^^'mz'"'' "^ ^'-f//^'^. 17L.C.J: (7. Aiul the power conferred on the Le<'i-la- U,re 01 Quebec by the Jiritish North Ai-rerica re ,.|. I '•''■"''''•'' "";' ""l"'""""'^^..! does not re,trict the power ol the Provi„,;ia| Le.'i«lature to the exercise of only one of these modes of punishment at a time by any particular act. lb. a. in Jj. Kj. ). Ill), ^, (J l,'s7;j . 'J«. i3ut the License Act of Qu<>' -■ ;^. i,„no«. ing as a penalty imprisonment with „ard labor Act, Iw which exclusivejiiri.-diction is given to the Parliament of Canada in matters of insol- Tency, an Act of the Lejrislature of Quebec, chai^ii. the constitution of an incoJ_,na« bt'neli tsociey, so as to compel a wi,low to re- ceive from the society the sum of $200 in-te,d of a lie rent of seven shillings and sixpence weekly, on the -round that the society i- 'n'oi" vein, I" wiiiiin the powers of the saiil" Le.'isla- L C. J.'29Vp: C. tk:"'"^"" " ''''''^' ''' r)0. Tlie Quebec License Act, in so far as it pre en, ,s to limit the powers of the a.ssi-M ee',' !l all ililliciilly ili.«ai)|K-ui-N° i li(' I nvy Council rccoj;iiizcs the treiieral iiriii- ci|ilc that the executive power is derived fmiii the le^'ishitive Dower, unless there be some restraining enactment. In this case it is said there is such an enactment (sect. 'Mi, B. N. A. Act). That section specially reserves tiu' """""'I'i' <■ lilt' judfies ol' the Superior tonrls, the County and District Courts, save tlie Cnurts of I'roliate in Nova Scotia and New Brunswic'K, to the Government of Canada. It IS (J. lite clear that without this section tiie ap- pomlmeiit of all the jud^'es would he in the J'andsot the local Governments ; and tiie sole question then is whether a "district magis- trate IS a district judj,'e? Some argument was attempted to lie drawn from section l;^0, is. N. A. Act; but that is oiilv a transitoiy clause providing tor the position" of those local oarers who have federal duties, "iiiiiil the I 7;'>. Airapplicalion to the Queen's Bench lor leave toajiiieal to Her Majesty in Privy Council was refused on tlie ground that under the Insolvent Act its jud"- iiient was linal. Special leave to appeal haviinr been granled by Her Majesty, the (oiestioii arose whether the appeal to Her Majesty's Council, s;!veii dejurc by Art. 1128 of the Code ol Civil Procedure, could tie taken away by the DoiMiiiioii Parliament, astliev had preu^nded to do by 40_Vic. cap. 41 umending the Insolvent Act, l87o. It was contended for the ajipellant that the jirovisioiis of the Insolvency Act, and of this aineiiding clause in particular, were an infringement ol' the l.'ith and 14lli sub-.sections I of section 92 of the B. N. A. Act, viz. ; " Pro- perty and civil rights, •• and " tlie administra- tion ol justice 111 the Province, iiicludiii" the LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. 452 constitution maintenance and organization of 1 n.vincial Courts both of civil and of crininial J"n>di(^tion, „,hI i,irli„li,i ;i J- N. 1.35, s. c. •11. Jn Ma/f,',-s of A-m-ii/nlhn. -Acu>,u of da,na,^es a^'ainst the St. Lawrenee Xavijration Company, lor havin^r w.ntere.i their (Jits ,n •■;"""" ;","!: Hivcr. St. .Maurice during the V Iter o( l«7.f-75. The action wa.s ha^^l "n •tiers patent granted to ti.e plainlitls hv the yuei.ec (xovern.nent, which conceded to iiien, as pioprie.ois, all rights in the water lots at the point in ipiestion e.xtending to low water mark and along the hank ul'lhe river. Tlie ulainliir- piviended ihat.lKMielendan.s should £;d!;,,,. a>res tor having wintered their hoats within il,e mitsolsncl, gram, and having (|,ei„,s,.|ves.-,nd icir employees pit.sed and repassed along the and ol lie pla„,t,|fs during the winter ,n"oin.r to and Iron, the said hoaK, the whole wu|,ouf the permission ol the plamidf. The delendanis ph'aded that the Quebec Government had lo riglitor aiiihorityto make such grant, as the shores ol the river and e.Mendmg to tlie part of lie river where their boats had "been anchor vas under the e.xdusive control ot the Uomin on Government as being a navigable and pnl ho rver, and that therefore tlie letters pa- Um, under which tl,epla,ni,tfs,lain,ed were null and void. J he .Superior Court niainlained this preension, „u in appeal-ZA'A/, that e au hority ol the Quebec Govern nien't ,hd e.Men .:^:;r'- '.'••■ i'';'''^'''^^ ''-'■!< o'H navigable rvei, but subject to the ihc restriction that hey should do nolhing which should in a, v na\,;.Mt,on, and therelore while the letters pa- ten were perlectly good and valid, the plaint ll- coi.id not claim anything or impos'e any . , liedetendants for having wintered their boLts., ■■.I- so long as ihey had constructed no ouavs, nlaives or other improvements ol which ihe ;l^-h'n.lants had availed themselves, and as e P anmIN had not proved that thev had si.ifeie I", 'htmag,. trou. the passing und rejiassing of "■ 'Icendants' employees to and from their Ix^-S^thal th y had no right of action again.st UN. I , „ . . ""'"-='' .i^iii.ij w a;,'rf.('u upon . LESSOR AND LESSEE. 451 |h'rfndants ; |„„ as defendants had raised a con- 'Haiioi, which had no. lK.en sustained in appeal .M.osts,n appeal would be ordered. A',,,-'; ! ^ V ';:!', 'i' ^'""''''' bugalioii.s beHriiig a lower rale nf LESSOR AND LESSEE. J. ACT.O.VBV P.RCHASEU OF LhaSK,, Pk^,,. il. AcTio.N' FOR Rent not vet Dce. ^Tlie Qiiubec Act In future the salaries due .l;e^repor.to„e.ierii.,anJrj;!{Ci;,'^.^!«4r3^'^^-^4;: 455 LESSOll AND LESSKK. Hr. Al'TION Co (KK.VIXd. ly. AciKiN ON Vkkiiai, Lkask. v. Al'I'OltridXMKNT OK Taxks. yi. Co.MI'KXSATION OK RuSW VII. Di.MAdKS KOIl DkTKIIIOIUTIOX. VIII. Uk.maxd c.k Kkxt. l\. .Iriii.sDKTiox IX Casks OK, ,vc<' JCIUS- DICTION. S.. l.iAiiii.nv Kou Rki'aik.s iioxk. ^1. LlAllll.lTV OK Lks.sKK. XII. lilADlMTY OK LkSSOU, XIIL iilAHII.IIV OK SlUKTV. XI V. XOTIL'K To (j( IT. Xy. Pavmkxt ok Kkxt. X\'I. J'osSKSSlilX OK PliK.MISKS. XV'll. l'KlVll,K(iK OK LkSSOK. X\'III. ItlOHTS OK IjKSSKK. XIX. RidHTs OK Lkssor. XX. KlUIITS OK SlIirKXAXT. XaI. Sl'hi.kask. XXII. Tku.mixatiox ok Lkask. X. III. UXIXHAUITAUI.K l'lU;.\IISKS. I. AlTIOX UY I'l IICIIASKR OK LkaSKI) PrKM- ISKS. 07. Tlu' pliiiiitirt' and aij|iellant purchased a hoii-o ol wliicii tlio di'li'iKliiMl had a lease, and in his doed of purchase recoj;Mized the lease and umlertouk lo he suhjecUo it. Heat'terwards took petitory actiiin to ^Min po-isossion, allej^ini.' that tlie lease had expired— y/t/,/, tlmt tlie jietitorv action was wrongly hronglit ; thai, having re- cognized the lease, hi.s proper recourse was an action in ejectment a^hetween lessor ami lessee ; and that, moreover, there heing noterm lixets. Saiisfui-on V. Biiuv/ier, (i (I L. K. ;i«4, C. C. 1880. ' III. ACTIOXS CoNCLRNIXG. G9. The right of the court to hear actinn.s between less(M- and lessee in vacation will in- clude a special demand to compel the landlord to secure to the tenant the peaceable and un- disliirhed enjoyment of his premises. Attiinu'}/ Gciirral V. Cole, 3 Q. L. U. 235, S. C, lf<77 ; 887 c. c* IV. Action ox Vebhal Li-;Asii. 70. Action on a verbal lease made for a vear at a rental of $48, payable in monthly pavmeiits of $4. I'lainlitr claimed $S, being "the "rent of • Aolion to nninil or to rescind a li-a-p, or «o recover daiiingi'!* ii'sullii]); Iriiiii the contiiiviMiti.iii o'' any ot the Ktipulalidiis ol the lease, or llii> noiifullilliiieiu of imy of the otiligatioiis wlilcli tin- law altaclies to ii, or arising from therelution of lessor ami les.^itv.Hic instituted eiiiiur infhi'.Snpiiiicir ijonrt or in the (.'iiciiit Court, ar.-.>i.!iii" to the ViiliiM or tlio amount of the lent or ilie aniouuto'f damages alleged. 887 0. C. P. LESSOR AND LESSEE. 45i; two months, ami asked besides tor the resiliation of the lease ami the ejectment of the defendant. I he plainliir proved a verlial lea^", and also that there were two months rent due, and, further, that there was a stipulation between tho pailies that in cii.«ie the deli'iidant failed to pav each moiith'H rent as it b,.caiiiedue the plainmrconl.i the lirst of the followins: month, demand the resilatKMiof the lease— //,■/./, dismissing the action KtniJ'm-oiirs, that plaintiU'liad no iTcrun until three terms were overdue. I'dlilia- v La/iirrrc, 7 U. I.. 241, S. C. 1878. V. Al'l'OllTIOX.MKNT OK TaXKS. 71. The plainlitr, the lessor, sued defendant for his share of the taxes on a buildnig, part of which was rented to ilefendant for Slljl) ami the other i)art to another lor !j!l,")0O. The other tenant sublet his [lortion for !i!2 1, ')()—;/,/,/, ilmt lu distiibiiting the luxes the lessor was n,,t bound toconsider the increased rent obtained bv the other tenant lor his portion. Hinitliillin- k Cainm, 2 L N. 240, 8. C. H. IS79. VI. C(i.MfKNSATl()X OK llliXT. 72. Action for $120, two vears' oeeupalion of a house and in ejectment." Defendant pleaded t lat he settled with the plaiiitill lor therentol' the lirst year, anil as to the rent of the secoml It was compensated by the greater sum of .si.MlO, due Irom pniintill to delendant under a nolarnil obiigaiion,on proof ol which action dismissed. i/ii/wiiis & Ikaiitrmiij, 'J U. L. 540, .S. C. 1879. \\\. l)A.\IA(il:S KOIl nKTKUIORATIOX. 7,3. Action against a lessee for delerioration Ol premises and the bad condition in which tliev were lelK and S'iOO claimed. Defendant pleaded that he had left them in a 1 'tter state than when he lia.l received them, but the house was 111 a detective state, that the roof leaked, and that he mtUTed damages in coiise(pieiice to the extent ol $l;!0. Question entirelv of proof, and a.indgmeiit iigaiusi deHMiilaiil for §150 was eon- '"■""■'i 111 appeal, linlland k l-hyiisoii, 8 li. L. 11.1, Q. li. 187ti. VIII. Demand ok Kkxt. 74. Where by the lease doiiiieile is elected bv the les.seeal the premises leas«l, the rent is pav- able there, and if no demand of payment have been made prior to suit at such domicile the action will be dismisseii, provided d.'leiidaiit show that he was readv to pav his rent there and bring the money into Court. J/,ani A' Mr- (roldrirL; 3 Q. ],. U.;!ii8, C.C. 187(1, & ir/iykk jSiiiiiiaii. Ibid. IX. LiAiiii.iTV KOIl Repaius Doxk. 75. Where the lessor atler a lire told the les- see to get the iiecessarv work done to restore the house, and send the account to him, and it was proved also that the lessor had the house insured and received the insurance monev ari,iinglrom the lire-.//,./,/, that he wasprnp<.ri"v sued for the cost of the re-toratiou. tiulie k Bell, 8 R. L. o;;5, Q. B. 1878. LESSKE. 45(, esfortlieresiliation It ol' tlip (Icrciiiliiiii. Icii-^(',iiiiil alsij iliat due, uikI, fiirlliiT, iH'nVCCIl till' |llllli('-i liiilcil lo |iiiv caoli > lilt' iiliiinliircoiiKI noritli, (Icnmiiil llie ''/, ilisiiiissinjr the iiititl' liii'l 11(1 Hctrmi nine. I'ellr/icr v. 1S78. XKS. ir, siie.l (ii'feii.liitit, a bmliliiij;, piirt (,f It lor Sli.JI> mill llie I,.'>OU. Tlie other 921M}—Jl,l,(, that e les-icu' was Dot ;•(! rent oliiaiiii'il hv Ull. IllU thill ill- i; 1«79. ■ars oi'cnpalion ot" IVIeiiiluiit [.leaiieil itill liir llie rent of rent ol' I he seeoiid •aler ,«iiiii of jJ.'iOO, t miller a iioiariai uetioii iliHiiiJvseil. I-. 540, S. C. 1879. OIIATIOX, (or (lelci-ioration tioii ill which liiev )ereii(laiit pleaiJeil 1 'tter state than lilt the house wan root' leaked, and Jiiseinu'iice to the I'ely of proof, and fur !?15I) was ouii- {''cnjatuit, 8 I{. L. icile is elected hy 1, the rent is pay- )l' paviiieiit iiiive ich doiiiieile the jvideil di'jt'liiliiiit v.v his rent tlicre •t. Jfciini it Mr. 187t), & ir/iyledi DOXK. lire tuM I lie le.«- doiio to restore lit lo him, aiut it r had the house snrance money he u'aKpnipiirlv ration, ^iilleii 457 LESSOR AND LESSEE. 7(!. Appellant „n the 7tli April, 1873, wa« in oeci.,,ation of u vui.,.. :'h,„„!,, ^Vhi, |,'| .\, .■H^e. rotn respou,, „,, when h tire ^,1 Ml the fat lorv oonsmned it as w,.|| as tlurJi ; f hi^rn:;^*''''''"'''^''''-''-'''^"''-' S:; I'A 111' latter to recover .•<8,,-,0() .Jumai't's occa- *il Ol' k II ".■■""^'''„ "'^' Mei;li.c.,i«. and nt ol .vkiji „, appellant and his m,',, ,„ llie maniilai'tiire of varnish Ci-nm i, //,./,/ ,. (• ■ • '""ii"'! iroin lieiizine. --//'/'/, condrmin;? .indtriiient of the Uiic-n's l.;Moh,that havin. fail,.,!,,, estahh I, ,?, I,' lire occnrre,] without a„v limit of hi. or of 1 ■m'M, n, a.:cordanee w„h ,|„. terms of a" . . 29 ' .N he liamages caused to ih-.' premises leased I'.V iiini ! and, moreover, that resp.,,,,!,.,,, l,,,"], , proved that ,t was ihroi.^di th • nei "i /, e^ f, HP|.ellants ,„e„ ,|„u the (fre oceinredtie was '''''l'-'>'''l"Art. l.l.'iOoftlK'CivilCoi ./for h. u.-^eola liarn .lestroved hv (ire when. ,1,1 pi™is that the i,arMwas\ie!:;;oSv^ ;•::;;[ nei-hKeiice of the lessee, linless^ hX' Ci^^s!.,-i:^;--r:7:irfc;;: sn.J/n.Sn^r'^i^ii'^-r^-^'T^^ ^IrOann-an, KIR. \!.\n%v{m ' * lu II niiantH leased an imnioveahle l,v lease t,, xpire the 1st .Inly, 1S77. !„ I,s7(i the Jwne'' o '^'■•"perty faile,!, and the plain tl V eca " lie purchasers from the assi^-nee of lie p • „pem- ■ei^;'r,r"- ^S'^ ^''^ "'li'-'iication .'^.r;-: ceived the rent (rum the tenants „p to the fir t ol May, 1,S71I, unJer the terms uftlie k^a e The ,k1 '"""^"V'"^' 'i^^te terminat . IkmIc e ! mt^lvNsner'.''""'""- '^^^'^ P^^-^^^ul- l.V ■■y\^i>'"<'- ;iu,,er,e, on the .-round h. t the (allure o( the (brnier proprietor and 1 e tv I a,i cancelled the lease, an.l that the ,ie t,,- dan s hy remaining, in thepVen.i.es a teiMl ■ ,' , -fc t'fi^'l'""' .^''•""'-''r'^ '-• Hnoll'ier . .a Cite de Monln-'.d, 24 J.. C. .J •>,j O ll it'^ prniiS^li'^lV";''"""''^^'^' '■'--'- reiiiK^es lease,! hy him in conseipience of their a'nit;;''7'r''^^''--^'''Uhi:fthe; ".isnopiool o( ,laiiia',res to the ureniises «,i no ^..liH ilyden.n,lant III leaving, an.^^uXv^n' de en.laia was ;,W«,i. /«,;/. |„.|,|e tbr ,t. .Vo/ ^t' 'jull v. Ha>-mbur,,,ir, 2 L. N. .'i.'i2, ,S. C, 1871» i»a"Xl^l:j;,":;;irr:^,!" I'-p'-^'- >ens.d more »hi,in he is lespi.nsibl,., anil u ii' f. ' '"-^■l"'"'' '"■" (-17 no inalterable iXli:}- ^^^t^^ ^ «n.i uot in li(v<,r , ,1 ii,,?nr ,,>,. ' '""" "' "'" '"■'•"■ ""Iv, Perty whosifl'ers os l^v'^Hr ^■,"''," " '»''.«"b"rins pr,'.: premises occupl^?d by »t!rie;soer'l(l3"c.''(?.""'''''' '" ""^ t Not reported. I LE.SSOR AND LKSSEE. 458 «0 A tenant who in tr„od fai,|, i„is ,,ai,| ^^,,1 'I anc,.totliepri.priet,,r,,fanini^ ne 1, 'I'l ''■'"'"""""' ^■'•'"•' niavhecon.l »' '■'! I" pay he rem a .eeon,| time to the hv- I lecarv creditor whose claim is not s r. ied I ^ I e sal,. „| the sai,i immoveahle. Dunuuv MrU„nw,l,mi, ,'! L. N. .'Mo, S. C, 1880 ^ XIl. Ll.UllMTV OF LK.S.SOR. p-i without ieas;h.,,m n,!^ r'N :3;:n:;e: 111 IK lea-eol the 2nd of Ju,„'. I'he lessee ■ftbe «'..trepartof,|iel,iiiM,„. having. et,p',! I'lnes lor the niannfactua-ot boot^and s oes o tliei,'reat inconvenience of the (',.,, ' 'II.. I ,1, :. I '■"'^"^'- Ol me (joii 1 ssioiiers ■" I ll'ei employees, who were ,|isli,rl„.,l hv tie I use aniljar, the Commissi,,,,,,, ,,,,„es ,.,i e de-nikn.(,heless,,|.),an,i called 'upon hm'o n stopt, ,l,e,„Msaiice. The ,iefendanl ,liii lollimg, ami ,,,, action hronj;lit-//,./,/ timt lessor who sullers oneof his tenants tocha ,^e i"'des ination of the leased premises, s,Vhs?,) llie same hnildmir, ,s responsihie, and will he onle,e,lt,.puta„eiidtotl,etrouhle u,is!', i-e «■ llie others the peaceahle enjovnie t f,l t e 8:^. The plaiiitiir, a -rocer, sneii his landlonl or .ianiag.'s ,lone to lii's stock ol I'-uc. ',, stoini J He qiiesiiun was as lu the luihilu , i a laiiillord (or .lamages canscl b tl e ^^,ee ot - /vj.s'.s'e.v reparations winch he h,;,! never I Z M. IJut in a suh-iequent case between the e'llC'lr' "'"'T"" r '" --'!'-'," lie pi ui,iih,;,„„,,|^„„,,, ^,,,^^^^^^ 21st ,I„|,. 1.880, the leased premises were, tliromd he Kros.s carelessnes.s and i.e-lect ,,f = ,• ;ant, (looded with water, b^^reul,'^' Sn'h « n...o lA'leinlant pleaded that the i)lainfi(K Uew.when he leased the pt'eiiiise., t la ,e ''""Im-was the result of the situat o of e premises, .'irisu.. from ,he ilrain wliu'l 1 rom h lu. water from the upper part of the street fn ntirely owiiiK to the insuliicencv of tlVe I,'. I.a all the neighboring propertik w4 e s i' . to the same overllow, and the overflow f^'h'p premises m question was not own '",„., 'f Y; ■^'ir.s; that the water came I'ronTile n, U dram under the control of the Pit,- f' "^ "•Inch was insulHciei to ,r.,m ,11 ',''"''" '"'^ and all the neighbori , -eel h u' w, .ie ' TT tlK. same timer that ,l?,^:,l:;::,t'Si;^;. (jlau'ie,! „f />:/." ."^^ m:onveiiience com- I i ill 4r)9 LESSOR AND LESSEE. crniioftinptlipcclliir Willi the piililii'dnkiii of llic Htrcfl. At tlu'sainc lime llic iicijrlilKpnii^ ctilura wci'c tliiiidcil iVoiii till' suriu' ciiiisc, mul it in in eviilciH'P tliut the (iliiiiitilt liail lm.l |iicvii>iiM cx- liiTiciicciilMirli lliMiils. Ill Jiilv, 1M7S, IichmIHtcI troiii a tliMid caii-c'd liy a iicaiy lall ol rain, and rc'ciivficddaiiia;;fslri.'Mi IIoIhicm. ( l'i,/r Sii/ini.) "^iiii'f llii'ii, wliilc lie placfilydud.MaH lifliirc in tlic icllar, lie placed ilu'iii aliovc llif level of tiie tldiMJ (il'If^TS. Slioiild i)elendinil pay llie iluiiiu;;e,s iMUlfed liy tlie last llduil ? 'I'roplciiig — l.ima^e, toni. " ' ■■ ■ ■ -. II. 1!)H: "Four (jiie le localenr «(jit tenu de jjaninlie, il laiit(|nc Ic prcneur ii'ait paw t'U cniinaix.-iaiiee de delaiiL et dew viucm." Su also I'ulliier- LoiiHi:.', n. U.'!; and |)iiverj,'ier— l.onaue, loin. ;i, n. :ill, 'J, ,{. Here llie plain- till' knew by the Hood of 1,S7,S uf tlie lialiillly to iiiiiinlation, to say iiolliinj; of llie iioloriely ul' llie iieiyhlKirlKJud and his previoiis reHideiie.e in the loealily, anil he coiitiiiiie.s the lease hevoiid the (ii-st year into the lliinl. I do nol consider thai law or eipiily .-honld hold the proprietors to pay dainajres eaiised liy an iniiiidalioii tliroiij;li water tlowin<; down Iroiii'ii lii^^her level. Jt was lii'ld in France in the i:a. e ol' JJoiirhevelle v. Croiizoz— Cretel, 41) Sirey 2:77,2,'! .laimarv, 1"^)'.', that It tenant had no action of warranty li;;aiiist his landlord lor an incuiivenience re- siiliiiig from a fact inherent (o the locality in which the premises lay, such as the hahitiial iiiundiitioii ol '•ellars, when il was notorious Ihat 8iicli il St. lie of things existed. Action dis- missed. i>c>79. XVI. POSSESIJION- Ol- Pl{K.Ml.Si;S. 88. Action of daiiinges for breach of contract to deliver jiossessioii of certain preinise.s leasee! by '.he defendant to the piaiiitil}'. Theie was no prelencoof malicious withholding, the defendant 203. "'^'^ '" "'"'''^ °" P°'"'' "''P'"*"'^"''*- * Q- ^' ^^ W). In .November, lH7r), the respondent issued li .iiiisir (/,i,/,ri(' agaiiiH the tenant or lessee of a .saw mill belonging to him, and under siidi writ a ipianlity of sawn lumber was seized. Appellai'l intervened, and (daimed the liinibi'i' as lielongiiig lohim and being on the premises for the purpose of being sawn, and was Ivi.i,' there subject to appellant's order. Fvidl-iiee proved that this was ihe case, and thai piaiiililf knew il was the projieitv ol lutervenaiit— /A/./, thai It was not subject to the landlord's privi- lege iiinler lllll) ol the Civil Code.t /V/rv .I'- Z/a//, II) K. I.. I'^O, Q. ](. lS7i;. 111). The intervening parlv purchase I an agriculliiral implement from' the defemiant, a L. iV. .■)7,S, .S. C. I.S7;). ' '■'2. Inlervenant alleged that the sewing- machine seized in the cause lor rent belonged to him, and that the defendunt would be owner ol it only when he had linishe I paving lor it. 'J'he plaintill rejilied that the delen.aiiil was in posse.ssioii of the .sewing machine when he took lK>.s.sessiuii of the premises, thai he had ever since been in possesMon of il and |iaid jiartol the price of it On proof ol tins intervenliou dismis.sed. Mtc/mud V. GuUbault, G t^. L. K. ISO, C. C. iHyo. ' I'.'i. The le,s.sorcannot,by an agreement with a third person, extend his privilege on the ellecLs in the iio.s.session of the lessee to more than eight days from the time of leaving the leased inemises, even where :nich ellecta are the pro- perty of ihe third jierson, his privilege being ab.solulely extinct after the expiration of eight '.>-',''• , "''">''> '•'■ i^czina ii. JJ' Orsuimens, tj Q. L.R. y:i, C. C. 1880. *i U. L. 664, and see I Dig. 392, 152. t I lie lessor lias, for the payincnt of Ills rent and otlior obliKiiiioiia of tlie lease, a privileged right upon the nioviable eirects wiiioh are found upon the properly leased, luiy (J. c. f r j II (It'livpriiijj t ic pir. ill liiH plra— /A/./, r,'/c A O'iranl,' iinii tlic Court 111' lii'^i iiniiL.'t'.-' hIioiiIiI |,e '('.ml iluiMii;;!' wikH //e, 2.1 L. C. .(. Ki'i. I' rCflMllnlCMt IM'JIII'.I Iciiaiil (ir IcsNcc ,,\' II, uiiil iimlcr siicli iinlit'r WHS Hcizi'il, IllllllL'll |||(> ImiiiIm'I' I!,' (Ill lIlC prciMIScs ivii, tiinl was Ivi.i^' i (inltT. KviilciKif , iniillliiit pliiiiiiiir iitcrcciiiiiit — llrl'l, ' liuiilK^rd's pi'ivi- Coile.t /'/•/(•(■ ,!■ (i. ly jmrdliiiso I an I till' (k'ti'iidiint, a lllC lm(lt'l'Hlaill|l||;r lidiil ill-lay. .Sliiirt- It wciil fur it, bill, II;.; rallcii aiiij ice ii was Coarcd ilmt lit out, and it was Ji'iiig, wl :'ii it was laiit — Ik/iI, ilial, Its li'aiiHiciilly and and nut Milijccl lu Iri'i'nj V. Giii'/ni'i H77. /eric tlie ojipusant iiigiiii,' to litT and iIk; (irivilegi' ol' laiiiu'd. IkUtttiicr S. U. IST'J. lal I III- scwiiiL;- br rent ln'loii?"r ■"'!'' 1''"'",'"^ '•^"si'd Ironi the auteura of ereJ ^1 u 1 ^■., ,.^."'^'^'"l'>ently the defendant, two ,',t . ";l.l^'"i"g property a wall twenty- S- 11 1 ''r'-'"',»'l'."^" I'hJ the eliect of ( le- pnv ng the plaiiitilt of a portion of hi.s li^ht- ^/^/./, that the erection of the wall in ,, ^^s L III, liiith 'd ui •ih'iiigeinent on the piaintitfH rgh,s,n„j.H.i.lease,°andKaven '•vMeiice the ('„„,i below declared the piano ■ l"clHrcditMibjeetloalieiilorrespo„dei,'s «'"t to an anioiint of over .^IIOO, acei .in.' and '•"'^crni', appellant w'asai.so(.nidenined op V 'IS own co-Is and a part of respondei it's' ii his ,niervenl,on-/',r C'«/-/„»,-\ Viih , n.^w a;lvert.i,. to the „1,| law. «h,cli. in he ,i, o >Ul.,s,.^,,,,v.,i,l,l no, sustain sncliud,'(!;s,o: ,!, " '• "' ',""■ ^"'''' ■"'■'''"■'^ todispose of the "latter III terms that a.lmit,.! verv little, lo„b' flecfsbeoniy transiently ,„. accidentallv . , ^^ .cpreniiseH asthebaggageofatravell^V iiiiinn, orartii;les.sei,t to a workman to b, '• rejiaired, or to an auctioneer to bC h 1 -' Now, It ,s clear from the evidence tha lU lo was on the premi.se.s transient! , I'll ore conies Willi, n the e.x,.eptioi,s- ',„ei ' -"K'd above. 'he lact of it.s being oniitte U e cases g,v(.n in tiie law lo' way ol7.l,J|'at,; ..V; "'" .'^.'''J''-. ",'" i"-tvlii.|e it from the oner- "tionolihe ('..de. There is onecise ■,, ' ~ (ithersw'eii known to iii,;^;;.;^::!,.,'';;:^ hat ,H Ka.stty tw. the Fabriip.e cff Montrea s ve view tin.s ca.se, the law' and the ji, ' ,,; , '.le ice concur m compelling us to reverse tT, J judgment, and It i. r['vers(::i accord :.\ Misis iigamst respondent. Irdand ^^ W,;;! 1112. A tenant became in.solvent. an.l the lea.'aej III Ion, refiliatioB of tl tile r Co it! •epresenlative of h lie lease and to d 2 I,. (', J. Kil.Q. It. lH77. I.iil,-lcl, mill till- »llll-lc»HCC llllcl lllllnl Mini lllllllc till llM-i).r|||MIMll, nnili'fllic ImioIvimiI Aci, toiin dlliiMikl iin-|).mh'c~ /A'/i/. timl the n^hl of llic Ichhki' Io |ii^< (iim LKHSOH AND LKSSKK. 464 l.v .w/.»/«' i/(i«/«r/.' ii^fuiiiHt lilt' |irim'i|.ul U-ifec, iinil iirivila'f on III,. jjimhIm loiinil -till rciiiiiinwl, an. I lliiil notwitiiHiaiiilinjr lie liu,| acoi'iitcil lln. rent 1,11-st.vciMl ti'iiiiM Ihini tin' Hi\l).|t.-.s,.,., wlu'rc 111! cxiinsH iinviilion uinl l|i^,■lmI•^re iit'llic priii- I'lpiii l,.-wt'i. was |,r,iv(.i|. J{„i/,r v. Mrlnr &, n;m, 21 I-. C. J. 1(10, S, C, ii 22 L. C. .1. KM, S. ('. H.^IH-V. Illl. Tlicli'li'nijaiit, asonp of a coiiiiniTcial liiiii. Imviiii; inuili' :in i ■'Hii.'iiiiii'ni in iiifulvfiicv , llif |iliiiiititt; 111.* Iiiiiili.ini, |,„,K- an ultacliiiii.'ul n^aiii>l liiiii iiiiliviiliiaily t.ir iciit ilni' ami to U-- ccnnc iliif. Tlic (Icl'i'iiiliiiil .l,'iniirri'.l, .'ruiiiii| iliat llu' r,'iii iiu,| ni.t pirvioiislv l,i.|.|i (icniiniilcl, ami that no ri).'lil wasshown I,') claim rent n,it vet iliu — //,/,/, that neither ol' tlieM. gi-diimi-i wniihl support the ileniiirrer in view ol jilaiiiliUs ileehuiili..n that ilelemlant, ana iiiein- lier ol ilie sai,l lirin, had made an a,sMij;ninenl ill in-olwiKn'. I'/diilc V. liiihilaille, 4 O. L. J{, 10"), Where a le:i«e contains a clause that all th<' liirniinre in t'.c house leased without ex- ception Hhall lie halile for the rent, the h'ssee cannot iinolie the exeni|itions set liirth in Arts. 5,')ll. '>:>- and.").")Sol'lhe("ode ol I'rocediire. liabi- taillr V. lioldnr, 4 Q. L. H. 17!), C C. 1H78. Kill. An. I sni'li a clause in a lease i.-i nut con- trary to piililii; ordi'r. lb. 1(17. An action Io rescind a lease iiiav he hroiifrht against a lessee who has hecome msoj- vent diirint,' the term of the leu-e Lnaiiiier ^ a>wii/, 1 L. N. :mi, S. C. U. 1,S7,S. 108. Ami awritin;; sinneil [,y the lessor, and not accepted hy the lessee, proitiiHiiif; that a new lease sinnild he eiitere.l inio alter a certain dal did not consiituieu lu .v contract of lease which could he plea.led in delense to an action to res- cind the ori;;inal lease. Ih. llil'. Action lor the (puirter'M rent, due 1st of August ot last year. The premises hail been ori,)-^l»u;il.i Lilhi.ijmphic 0>., D H. I,. OK), S, U I87!t. 111. Where a lessor seiziil a h,irse /(^o- ihnil III- sinti',i\ horsi' whi,di ha.l b,'en on the Jiremises but It was proved ilid not belong i.i the ,l,.|end- aiit but to the opjHisant.an outsiile parly--//,/,/ that the seizure must be ,lischiu-ge,|. IJrfnrr/ii,', v. IjfUitijf ii l)esiiiiii(tin,2 I,. N.'.i.')0, S. (;. 1H71» 112. Where, to an action lor rent ami to res- cinil a lease (which was tl,r nine vears), the de- lemlant pleaded that the lessor at the time of the e.vecution of the lease wasonlv usufructuary of the property, ami ha.l no hiiig",.,- anv interest having since renounce,! her usiifnict—//,/,/ reversing the judgment of the Court bel,,w' that III an action umler a lease the lessee conlii not call in (piestion the less,,r's ntU.. I'oUraH ii, Jkn/,r,'2 L. N. ;t'JU. (,» |{. IHVJ. n;t. An intervention I.i a subtenant, |)ravin2 to have his effects exempted from the lamlkmls privilege torrent due. There was a prohibition against subletting in the lea-e, and it had been decideil III the case of ^V.v^r.v „r V/iariti/ iV i'liUe cl III, I. Dig. 760-1H8, that where sii,.h is the cai ■ thesiib-tenant cannot claim the benelit ol his pave- ments 10 the lessee, but his effects are liable lor the wholeainountofreiitduc. Smil/i v. Ledaire. .S. C. !87'J. ' 114. A les.sor has no right to an action for the la.xes line umler the lea-e until he has him- self paid them to the corporation. MaiUi v Nw/ilcr,2 L. N. 414. S. C. I87'.l. II.). The defeinlant occupied Ihc h.iiise of plaintiff' ihjin 1st May, 1878, to Isi May, I87i), by sutterance. In the beginning of Mav, 1873, he leff the premi.ses, and the plaintiff' imnie.hate' ly sueil out a.v,(/.<(fl i/ai/eric /mi- ilmit dv suite to secure the rent tor the vear beginniii" the lirst of Mu\ . 1879. The demand was that the seizure be .Icclared valid, and that the defendant be con,liiniH.,l to pay the rent ior the year, namely, .'52 tu— 7/,./,/, con tinning the seizure, Imt refu.'ingthe seizure (or sucl. rent as would he tuii'id 1.1 be due at the end of the vear, and main- taiiiiiig Ihatpart of the plea wnich allege.l that tiiere was no rent iliie when the action was in- stitute.l. J,mi)k y. Smith, H L. N. llj, s. C, 18.80. 116. The plaintiff' seizeil a p, mo par dmit de ■suite, the right to seize which she had renoiinee.l by a writing in the Ibllowing terms : "1 herehv " agree not to hold the above naineil piaiioliirte " ibr house rent or lor any other claim against ''Mrs II. "_y/,./,/^ i„ the Court of lirst insTance, that this agreement mured to the benelil of the tenant without the iiiteryention of theowners of the piano, iiiit in review tiiis part of the judg- ment wa.s rever.sed, and the agreement was held to be Ibr the protection of the owners of the piano merely, and could not be made use of by the teniiiit fur Irt advaniagc. (,;<,■.« v. Iludm'ii A: Gordon, 2 L. N. 260, & 3 L. N. 78, S. C. 11. looO* LKSSKK. 464 willi costM. Joseph Inicril tlii'clcfc-iwlant IcimuikIi'iI t'nirii liim lie rt'i|m'Ml llic |i|jiiii- III IcilVf It ill llJM |K)„. iiiid llic iki'tliiii vvitH llii'ili'lriidaiii wiiiilil . />•'// V. //»,/,„„/. ■ y It. I.. IK), S.U. ■il a lior-'c imr ilmit ii'i'ii 1)11 till' |ii'('iiiiscs, I'l'lll^' 1(1 llic (IcIlMlil- lulHiilfiiaiiv— //./,/, ;lia|->:i'i|. li'/rrrr/ii,, ■ N.2:.l), M. C. 1«7!). lor iciii, mid to rcH- iiiiii' vcarw), the lie- <-^oi' at till' tunc of iMoiily iiwiifruciiiary li)ii>;cr any interest ■r iisiiinict— //(■/,/, the Oiiurt heloa, a.sc llic h'MHee could '"r'-> htle. I'oifni.i IH-'J. siih-tciiaiil, praying lioiii liic hmdinrd's re wiiHii proliihition -c, and it had heeri iij' Chaiitii A YihU crc Hindi iM the cm.j lie heiidilol hinpiiy- H'cctHrtie liable lor Smith V. Leclaire, it to nil action for ' until lie has Inni- iriitioii. MailU V. 87SI. pied llic house of to Isi May, 187i), iiiij; of May, 18"!), ilaintiti' iiiinicdiate- IKir driiit lie suite car hej,'iiiiiitig the iiiiiid wan that the tliat the det'endant rent ,or the year, inn thcNei/.iire, hut . rent as would he :iic year, and main, wiiicli alleged ihut the adion was in- i J^- N. Uu, S. C. p.:ino par droit de she had reiioiinceil :'rnis : "I herchy ■ named piaiioloit'e her ulaiiii against rt ol lirst insiaiice, J the benelit ol tlic on of the owners of < part of the judg- ,'reeiiienL was held die owners of the be made use of hy L. N. 78, S. C. 11. 4fir) liKSSOU AND LKSSRK. def. iidaiil, t.xik in execution a marc, .,m",il,us and harness. I'crrai.lt da Ilhalthcv v'e NH pro.icrly, and coiild n .1 an-wcr f„nl c ■,.,, lt^';luff^l■'^'r''''"^'''^■>•''''''''''''''•"^ co>rH„dowlo,i„din lavoroftheinlcrvenor. In review jiidgiiicnt reversed, and contestation sT lt:''r'so. ■'^'''''''' '■ ^^"""«"'t r,:rnn,,t, nx. Appellant got po!,He»Hionofros,H),idciii's oiisc as subtenant of the princij.al lessee. On the 2i„l iMdiniary, |8-(;. )„. ,vrote to respond- ent, ollcnug t„ lake the house at $:m a vea for three years „„ condition of certain repairs being inadc. This letter was i,,,t lonuallv T- copied but appellant staid on until May, 1878 when he gav- up the house. The ■ esp uden vvould not take II o|f bin hands, hut on the 1 Angustsue, tl,ca,mcllaiitlbra.,uarier'sreit Appidlant pleaded tliat I.e was not a tenant li three year-, but iicid the lioi.se by tJitr T"''"'u7l '■'"" ""- l'^''"=i|»»l <•■■■ forme Ua «'?• .1 •■''"'■, ''■'" '""^ -'ller the first of *lftj.. 18, >, than the H.n.ier lessee had been paving, that It w.is evident he did not hold by to; tr rrmndartion, and wa.s liable li)r the rent XX, IlKilir.S OK Sl'U-TEN'AN'T. n„V'':|'^'''^'^'''"''"''""' '™«eda store fnini one I iiboid,an,I some limc,if,en,i,^. n„i,|pk|„, tore to the planmir with the consent „fie landlord, who ,n,erv. u.^l in the lease. Sul,- seipienilv-' lefendant having reliis.d ,„ .ive possess,,. .- il'e Hub-tenaiit, the lalter took"aii u ," i" ri'',*",""'"' '" '''■' <'^^ii "ame. Delcn- dant olcaded thai the action in ejectment „ei- Wis «eM taken. Jaeyer v. Satwi, I L. >f. l.i'j LRSSOH AND LK.S.MKR. .|(!,; HIant, asaltorneyoriiis brother, to w , he ""' 1"^"^ y tn,ns|errcd all his n.-hls hi the '"•"ii^cs, iranslcrrcd all ins bmllicr-s rcdiH :;;:;:;;'';;,•; '■•' - •app.diam. subT I'Knllv all ihc pro|«.rly and rigln, ,,f |,. v It 1. said premiHcs wre s-.ld by tl Ileal i-Higi,,.,. „ I,,.. ,„,,^,,,^ ,^,,,1 rcsp„i,denls became "" pure lasers, sunjivi t,, t laiises and con- ";':':,"' "'" '^'"•' "I I e an t a,r. ul, I l"r he leas,,, nil,.,,,., I,,,,,,. II , , '•""•""■'"'"•l-r-.niscs, thathcliadsul,.!,,,,,.,! !';'';-''ntraryt,,,h,.,,,,iditi.,iisai,ds,i uinns I Ihe lease, and thai he had neglc'tcd |,, kcc„ a^K'd l„r the resilialion nf il,.. Use. ai,.| Wlv aniagesl,, the extent of *1 ,t;o()-/A./,/ „„,|,,r ;ese circumstances, thai the st,pulalioii',,f the Ihst lease against suhlelling was slill m iWivc "-i.;.i. he s„b.h.ssee could 1. „./..';.',' v;;;,;. at, "■',""■ "";''""i«-<'"l''tH. action, but latll.e rans|,.r and assign,,,,.,,, ,„„,,.,„ „„. ,';,'',;'''' """; l;'-""""- M.cludca c;aim for '.iimi-cs caiisnl In the [iremises by dcterioralion I'l-evious to the assign,,!.,,,,, i,,.,,,,-.,,,,!,',',;;;;;,:;^: ^tv„7"''''r '/; '"^■"""'""' i-' 'lie assig„„„.,;t. 7!""",;,'^' /"""'■'"", !l It. L. -,:)!, Q. if IS7., reMol:; ,■ \T'\ ''"' ""' " '■'-'" '" "l"i'i'i 'lie rescission o( the lease for violation of a slip,,- at on a,rainst suolelting. w e the Hubdease hereb'v "'"-^ "'" ^""■''l^- '"'^ ""^ '«■'•» i"J"'--» XXII. T|.;iiMi vTiox OF Lease. XXr. StJB-LEA.SE. 1.20. In July, 1874, the flrni of B. H. & Co which liad earned on bu.sines.s as timber mcr- UiantH tor some years in the district of Tliree Rivers, leased todetendants ll.e sawmills which am a field adjoining, lor the term of three veaTs 1S7VTi"«'"' i"' '^"•""."'"'^"iK ll'e rtrst of.Tuly, rate of «7n.l"; '".'r ^^l-^"' ^''"'^'"- ^^^^-'^^ ''"' rate ol $701) lor the lirst year and !«s800 for the '^ub.sequent years. One of thedause.^of the lease provided that the lessee should not trai.sler h s in! , ("Ii 7'"'""' ''"■?P'-e'^'* '^"nsent in writ- "i« o the les,sors. In the year following L. A ^^■, who had succeeded to the right.s of B H A ^o., entered into a notarial agreement with the appellant, hy which ap^xdlant'eiigugcd to put machinery necessary for a llour"iiill to tie value of «;i,000, and on his part L. A. li gave the tree use and enjoyment (,! the mill and ether ependencies inentioned in the lirst lease to ap- pellant for SIX years. teriiiinaii„.r th» li,— •■•■ mle,' •/ '".'".'^', **» ?««i«>>inent of tlieir piopeity to an otiicial assignee. In 1878 ap- rails erred lo appellants, m trust lijr his credi- tors, hi.s i„,.,.est III an unexpired lease, en dm ' Montic, I, known as the Honave.iture buildinir. and nil he furniture. On 1st April, 1,S7I., .V . ' ;:; P'-^P"-'"'"- and les,sur. alter cancelling, witii' o the"T,'n r ■ ''"""T"*"'- t'H" Keverarleaie of the said liuildmgand premi.ses. ^ave a lease avear of ?l!c l"'?!'"" "'"T,"' ""' " '"' «''•'""> a year, of the building, an.lalsoof the furniture belonging to S.'s creditors, and on the s, me 'ay by a notarial deed •'«,/,•«,.,«.„/,,,„/ „,,';," I A. P. promised and agreed to pay to uppeilants as triLstees of .S.'.s creditors, wliatevcr 1 le v .IJ rece ve Iron, the tenant bey 1 .¥,5,000 a vea vvith a large proportion of tlie furniture, and appellants receiye,! $3,22:Ubr insurance on ix' tures ami lumiture, and $71)1, being the pr.j- av«lTr'r'''"'r'lr'"« -'■'!- ''''•»i'''^e iu i.V ,^''','T" ^^'"'f-^vas then cancelled, and the iandlord.aftcrexfiending a lar.'euii.oto orepau- the building, llased The 'p,^,;:,' ".? , L. I • ;ic Co., lor .4ii,,000 a year, from Oct., l87:i Appellants thereupon, as trustees of S 's crcli- tors, sued res|X)ndciir^ rcpre.senlmg A. P., ami called Ui«ii then, to ivader ,.n a..,count o le a nount received from (}. and L. p \r c ' M'.ntreal held, aihrming the jud^'ment of the Court of Queen's Bend,: that\lie lea e to G terminated by /,;-,« majeure, and that the obhgat.o.. 01 A. P. topivy appellants the sum 4G7 LEVEL OF STREETS. of ?1 ,000 OMt of (lie said ront of $0,000 ceased witli till. .«aid leiiHc firowur & Pinnimiieault, ;i S. r.Alo^,. 1(12, Su. Ct. 1H7!». 12.'i. And the fact of aiipcllaiitsliavins; alleged tiieiii-flves in tlieir declination to he the " duly named tru-lees of S.'s creditors" did not give them the ii<,'ht to hritii; the present action^for ^. ^creditors, the action, if any, helon<,'in},' to the mdiviilMal creditors of S. under Art, li) of tlie Code of Procedure.* lit. XXIII, Uninhaiiitaiu.k I'remises. 124. Tlie resiliation of a leai^e on aceotint of [he unMiiiahitalile condition of the premises leased can oidy l)e granted on the most ahsol'ite procit that (he premises are uninlialiitahle, and that that is the only recourse the lessee possesses jVarrlntml v. Vatii et vir.,2 1,. N. 2(i;j, & 2;i L. C._.I. 2o9, k il It. 1. [,X\, S. C. 187!). 12.). Action lor rent of a house which defen- dant iiad never entered into occupation of, and liad retu.seii to receive on account of its alleged unsanitary cundition. The house wa.s to^he ready lor occupation on the first of .lulv, and on the alternoon of the .'JOth ol .fune, according to the evidence of the sanitary inspector, it was not in a good sanitary conihtion—7/W(/, that (he de(en(lant was not lionud to receive it under liis agreement. SItutcr y. Saunders, 3 L. N. l.il, S. U, 1880. LETTERS OF ATTORNEYS- ATTOENEYS. -See LETTERS OF CREDIT. irl'J?,*?''*'^'^'* '■'"'* t:A.\CEI.I,ATION' OP, «ce DA- MAGES. LETTERS PATENT. I. Appeal in Actions to Annul. 12(i. The delay to appeal in actions to annul letters patent is only forty dai'.s. Ain/ns, At- IhI"''' ^'^'"^"^ ^ Murray, 3 L. N. 108, Q. E. II. RlOllTOF QfKI)E(,'GoyKRNMK\TTO GuANT «ee LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. L Change STREETS. LEVEL OF STREETS. OK Br CoiipoiiATfON, see • No pr rson ciin n«e Uip name of nnother to nlond ex- CHpt til,. Crown, throuxli its rccojjnizpd odicTs. Tutors (■lll■ilt.lr^ ami odiois, reprcuptitiiiK persons wlio Imvo not tlip (r(',;o.\prci8.. of tlipir riglitu, plpa I in tlieir own nimip i„ t .,.iiTP9pectivpm;aliiip», r.H-pwatio.ii! ulc-ad in their corporate name. 19C. C. I'. LIBEL AND SLANDER. 468 LEVIS. I. Interpretation ok Act amending Act op IxcoRPORATioN OP TowN OF, sce ACTS OF PARLIAMENT. « vuic v^r LIABILITY. 1. Joint AND Several, see OBLIGATIONS. LIBEL AND SLANDER. I. Action for. II. Against Candidates at Municipal Eleo TIONS. III. Aggravation of in Plea. IV. Bv Newspaper, V. Bv Physicians in Publishing the Ail- ments OF their Patients. VI. Damages for. VII. In Petition TO Municipal Cou.ncil. Vin. In Pleading. IX. Jurisdiction in Cases of. X. Justification. XI. Pleading in Actions for, ,?ee PLEAD- ING. XII. Pt'lll.lCATION OF. XIII. WUATLS. I. Action for. 127. Action will lie for slanderou.^ and de- famatory word.s uttered by a priest durin" the course ol'^hi.s sermon. Viyneux & Noheux, 21 li. L. J. 8J, S. C 1877. 128. Action for verbal .slander. Evidence held to be insuflicient to support the demand Mallette v. Gumj, 2 L. N. 32.5, S. C. 1879. 129. At a meeting of the cur6 and mari'uil- lers of a parish, at which plaintitl was present, lie pointed out to defendant, the chc*;, that he was acting irregularly, and told him he should reler to the statutes and not to the authority he was quoting. Tliec(/)v! replied " uous etes un komme d,m(iereux"—Jfel(l not actionable La- fleur v. Guilmdte, 2 L. N. 201, S. C. R. 1879. II. Against Candidate at Municipal Elec- tions. 130. Plaintifr was a candidate for the office of alderman at municipal elections lield in Montrea , when, tli« evening previous to the voting, the deli-ndant published in tiie Montreal mtneKsa. letter signed Argus, in which he cau- tioned the public against plaintiU'and his can- didature, accusing him of being a8|)eculator and enriching hiinselfat tlie public e.xpense; and in onler to give weight to his arguments be adde.I that some months previous the plaintilf having undertaken, in his capacity of contractor, tore.^^ tore a house which had lieen dan)a"ed bv tire asked for tenders tL.r the ditferent parts of the work^ that tenders were submitted, and anion" other, o,..- of ?000 for the ma.sonry, and Uv.?l pluiiititt told the contractor in that case that iANDER. 468 T AMKN'DiNo Act op F, see ACTS OF 3 OULIGATIO.VS. .ANDER. T Municipal Elec- I.EA. BMSHINO THE AlL- eiPAi, Council. S OF. FOB, see PLEAD- anderons ami de- priest diiriii'; the ux & Niiiseux, 21 lander. Evidence iport tlie demand. , S. C. 1879. 'itrd and iiiarguii- intirt was pre.-ent, tlie cw(^, that he >ld hini he alioiild ) the authority he ed "■nous ids im t aclionahio. La- (>1, S. C.K. 1879. Municipal Elec- te for tlie office of ctions held in previouH to the i in the Montreal in which heoau- II tiff' and hin can- ;as]K.'culiitorand ; expense ; and in Mnents he added e plaintiff having contractor, tores- ilaniageil hy (Ire, rent parts of the itted, and among :i.'ionry, and tiiiit 1 that case that 4G9 LIBEL AND SLANDER. his tender was too low ; the tender was there- upon raised to $1,200 and was accepted, hnt when th<. pJaiMtill was paving for the work he retained ijlOO for himself. Wli.n the plaintiff saw the leter he went to the ]yil,„'ss office and (lemaiMled the nameof the writer,and pul.lishcd him>ell arepiv in whi.d, he explaincl that the terider referred to had l,een raised beccise it ,lid not inclinle all the work whic^i, had to he done, and denied that he had ever asked for or re- tained anything Ibr himself as charged De- fendant replied, reiterating hischarges."l'lai„t,ff the tru h o the charges, an,i that thev were justihed in the interests of the pnhjic, the plain- tiff l.eing a candidate fbr a pnhlic otlioe-W,/ on the proof that the defendant iiaving tiiil,.! ,o estahhsh the truth of the charges was alto-ether unjustified in making them, and must pav $100 SirrcTir''" ^■"""''•'"' ''■ ^"''^"'''^^^■^'■ LIBEL AND SLANDER. 470 III. Aggravation- of in Plka. of character plea,le,l that the action was hron-ht or the purpose of extorting woncy—lM.r \o he an aggravation of the slander, and $200 and S^s:c.iS'"'- ^'^'"^^ - »^'-. 1 j^. N. IV. By Newspaper. re.!i'«:i,r.'^ P,"''''«l'er of a new.spaper at Mont- real who mails tliere copie.s of his paper con aining hhellous matter to a number of indi- d'lals and to public reading rooms in Quebec, will be lied to publish tha? tnatter in Qiebe^ l-','> \ ^^.""''-"'V. -ty. L. R. 8-,, S. C. 1878 JM. Action of .iamages fbr libel against the pioprietors of the .SV,,*- newspaper. The pas- sage complained of in plaintiff was one of a firm of stevedores, aiKf bis statement in substance was this: that I lie steamship Jesmond, Captain Batt, arrived 111 port, this being one i,f the vessels that plain- tiff .s firm was accustomed to unload; that one oi the pi ,1,1 Iff s firm went to appiv for the un- oadiiiguf her, but the defendant called out to taptain Batt not to give him tlie unloading', be- cause one of the ffrm, meaning the plaintiff" had stolen some of his coal. The plaintiff com- plained of tins expression, and also claimed for lie loss of the work on behalf of himself and usijartners. 1 he court below found that de- teiidaiii was not justiHed in making use of such an expression, and he was condemiie,! to pav ^•)l» damages. In review the court considered be judgment to be correct, and confirmed t, nit tlie !i(i,jO, It was observe.l, was alloweil oiilv tor the verbal slamler, and not bv reason of anV rights which plaintiff represented in the firm of stevedores. Bowdeii & Hart, S. C. U. 1880. Vir. In Pktition to Municipal Council. l.S. I he defendant was a municipal elector o the township of Warwick, and tlie plaintiff at tfie time of the occurrence of the facts com- plained of was mayor of the village of I'rinc- ville, and as such a member of the Miiiii>,ii,al touncil of the County cfArthabaska, in which the townsbip of Warwi k is situate.l. The delendant and some other electors of the same iiiiini.npality presented a jietitiou to the said bounty ( ouucil, praving that a certain bye-law, known as bye-law No. 7, should be set aside and among the reasons alleged iu support of tlie petuion were that certain uiembers of the council, including the plaintiff, had voted for such liye-law contrary to theircoiivictions, from selhsb motives, and for personal popiilaritv, owing toelasticity of conscience and in c^Mitempt of their oath of office-//,-/,/, maintainin.- a condemnati.in for $25 damages, t,, b,. .leiiuna- tory an.i actionable, the said allegations not "eiiig material and no prool appearing that they were made without malice or based upon reas,,n- I' 1 iiiil 471 LIBEL AND SLANDER. VIII. In Pi.EADiNoa. Till. Action of(lntnai;e.= bv one advocate a-aiii-t another, on the firuiiihi that tlu' ilelen- (laiit ia( in a faclnni in a previons case whioji they ha(l ha,l to-et!ier. accnwed 'he plaintiff of tmiiil— //eA/, tliat without exf)ress pi-uoC ol' malice on the part of the delenda-it, the action innst |je 'ht action there a^'ainst the defendants for a lihel contained in their paper published in M.mtreal, wliere the detendants resiiied, Imt circuhUed in Quebec. Declinatory e.\ception was tiled, on thejjroiind tliat the publication of the libel if any, u-as in Montreal only— //(-///, disini.ssi'n.. tlie exception, tiiat a person who mails in Monf- real iibcllons matter to be received and read in Qiieliec pnl'lishes ti.Lit n-.atter in Quebec. Ir- vine V. Duvonuvj et at., : L. N. 1,'!,H, S. C. 1873. X. Justification-. 141. Ill an action for lihel against the O^w;'- rierr||t at snch a meeting to discuss the previous ad- ministration of appellant, ami while he was quite jiistihed in making statements to influence t le e lectioi., provided the statements were true tliat he was not justifie.l in trying to make those present believe that appellant hud acted dis. honestly ,n the performance of hisdiities, when the f.acts to which such charge is based amount simply to the neglect of a formality, which a^ was proved in the case, had been often neglected liud with the sanction of the Department of .vtucation,and must be condemned in daniasres ; but, as he had on two occasions retracted~tlie .statement and ofi;.re,l explanations, jud-nient lor!>^)andc.«ts. I'owel &, (FuMw.y, 8'K. L Out), Q. B. 1.^78. LICENSE LAW. I. Ai'pi.icATioN OP Act. jr. Ci.osiNo Bar. HI. Oox.sTiTUTioNAr.iTy OP Act. IV. CoXVlCTIOiV I'XDKlt. V. Costs of Co.mmit.mext. VI. Lkexsk to Bhkw uoks xot In-cmde License to Sem,. Vir. PoWKK OF ReCOUUER UNDER. VIII. FuoSECt'TIoNS I'NDER. IX. Power of Provincim. LE(iisi.\Ti-i!F J*j|?j!y*K''-^'">'o> *«''LKiily a i^encrul allt'irii- wliicli it appearcil I' Mdiitreal. [Jinler yoiiM not allow cvi- ■ tlie Hfjt'cial artii'le Rc(ji)M\. Wckaoi' naire.a, for liavinj; at iiis.uioiier.s said tliat iniiiissioiier the pre. vii(hdate for re-elci:- liad acted dishonest- ident liad tlie rijiht s the previous aij- and while he was tenients to inlliience Heinents were true, 'yi"a to make flKJse lant hud acted dis- of hisiliities, when ■f,'e is based amount rniality, whicii, as leen ol'teii iiegleeted. the Department of eninedindamaires; sions retracted' the anatioim, .jud^'inent Walkcra, HK. L. AW. ' Act. >Ks NOT Include UXDKIl. U, ijKlilHLATl FU; .A.TIVE AUTliU- dieo License l^aw of litpior lietui'cn the L'itv of Mun- L. N. '5!)1,S. C. \jHvi lire too lonjr to iiinncr..sary U) jiuiiil ;ii>luturu brings luitli 473 LICENSE LAW. LICENSE LAW. I IL Closing Bab. 148 On a (lem.ind for a writ of prohibition against the Recorder of Quebec- //<./,/, that con-idering that it was proved that theplaintith tiie ho elkeeper, occu,.;e " the same liouse him- self \yitli his family and also took in and kept hoarders, he was not oblige.l to keep his house cIosTd on Sundays, but merelv his bar. I'oitmx iJ'l^nVj:'.!''''' ''<-' ^« "'^ ''« Q'"^l'<-<'' 9 It. L. uol, o. u. io7y. 474 III. CONSTITI'TIONALITV OF AcT. , .j-}'^- The plaintiti; demanding a writ of pro- hilmion, Imd been condemned by the Iteconler of Queliec to $40 an.l costs for keeping his place open on Sunday-//eW, ,hat the Local Le>'is. kture had only the power of imposimr iiceifses on the sale of liquor \or the purpose of raisin^r a revenue, and that the License Act. in so far as It pretended to restrain the sale of liquor or im- pose a penally of imprisonment with hard labor was unconstitutional and void, ['oilms v Cm'- poyatwn of Quebec, 9 II. L. 531, S. U. 1879. loO. I he License Act of Quebec, in so far as It pretends to limit the powers of the assi.'nees under the Dominion Insolvent Act, is uHra rhrs and void. Cote V. Watson, 3 Q. L. R. 157, S. C. IV. Conviction rKDER. 151. On a petition for habeas corpus frrm a conviction under the License Act ti.e ones, tion was as to whether the prisoner i.'as n.'htlv convicted under the section HI. He v as license;! to sell liquor 111 quantities over three halfpinis, hut not to keepahouseofpublicenlerlainment He was convicted tor selling bv retail. It was argued that the conviction sh/niM be for sellin<' mthe hou.seor place where lie is licen.sed to ,-eli jvliolesale-//eW, that the paragraph does not hear that construction. The reference to the iou.se or plact applies to another ottence, name- ly allowing liquors to be 'ner, Q. B. 152. Prisonerwas Hne.l $75 for selling li(iuor without a license in the city of Montreal, and asked to be liberated on /labca.s- rorimf on the ground that he should have been fined $95 The clause imposinfi; a penallv of ,$75 was for sellin.' I liquor outside the citv without a license 'Jhe ' defendant was therefore c nvicted and fined under the wrong section-7/e/,/, that the pri- soner must lie condemned to the exact penalty applying to the offense for which ho was con- victed, Mhi. whether higher or lower, the commit- ment must be quashed, Lijnott exparic, 7 R. L. 4^l>, Q, U. 187(i. loJii'''" A conviction, based on the License Act, I87U, whicil ordered that in default of moveables to pay the fine, or m case of their insumciencv, •leteiidant would be imprisoned lor the costs of the seizure, and sale held bad. Rodnuue exn. & I'aquin, 8 R. L. 315, 8, C. 1878. V, Costs of Co.mmitment. ,\^.^- The petitioner wasconvicteil for that lie, at the village of St. Jean Baptiste, in the first division within the district aforesaid, sold in- toxicaliii- liquors, and he was .sentenced to nav a fine of !?7j., and the further sum ofSH7 lor lii's costs. I here was the usual addition for arrest commitment and conveying to gaol if the line' were not paid. The fine not being paid the iinh-e o( .se., un.ler which he was sent to gaol for three months, unless these several sum-; were paid, "and all costs of the arrest, coinmitmenl and convevin" him to >'aol " amounting to the sum of S2.70 be sooneT- paid -'tlel,l, on a jietition for habeas corpus, that there was no authoritv lor any cliar.'c lor the arrest, ..oinmitment and conveVing the prisoner to-aoi, and he must tlieref)re l>e dischar-e,!. Archuoibaull exp., 3 L. N. 50, Q. ]}. l8,so. " VI. LiCEN-SK TO BheW does not INCLIOE LI- CENSE TO Sei.e. 155. Petitioner was condemned bv the Police Magistrate to pay a fine of $75. U'-sides costs, lor having sold a dozen bottles of beer at one time.without having previously obtained licen.se in term.softhe Queliec License Act 3f Vic, as ameided bytwo later Acts. The petitioner pleailed bef,u-e the Magistrate not guillv, al-o that he was '-..in^r prosecuted Ibr bavin-' sold wholesale; that he had ri-ht to sell wholesale, lor he was partner with one McN. and another named McL as the firm of McL., McN. & L, I l.at WciN. held a licen>e as a brewer from the Dominion; that it was un.ler that license that dotendantsoM. if indeed sale could be proved against him. [t was prove.l that the Ihni all,..r,.,| lad existed since Aug;ist, 1K75, and McX. wa.s holder of a license fnun the Dominion (Joverii- meiit, a license to brew, but not of record. I'rr C»n«/«-Allowing -hat McN. has u Dominioa icense, could, or can, L. just,:y in a prosecu- '1011 like this under it? Cm a man who jrcts a brewers license from the Dominion give the lieneht of it to any number of per.sons whom lie joms as partners with him, and enable them to plead, as L. has done, in (Quebec i'rovinee? I S C 1877 '•''-'''^''"'"'■' ^'i«"ii'*sed. Leoeillc exp., VII. Power of R-jcorueb under. .n?,'''':..T'"'r'.^*''"^' ■'*''■ ''^'^ P""" "I'ler ■section 102 ol the Lkv use Act to revoke the certilicate Ln!'1^S:7i878/'''''''''""'^-'^^''''"^'* VIII. PkoSKCITIONS t'NDER. 157. A pro,seeufion under the Q.iebec License Act may be brought in anv district if theollence lias I en committed on board of a .'teamboat or s risTn ^^"^ "''''"""« ^■•"^'•' 1 I- N. oi;, 158. And stich prosecution may be brouga.s he .lid, notwithstanding tlie note u-J i^i^L-l^Ss'a'isT?^''""'^'^^--^'""^ IV. What is. LOAN. I. Buoker'.s CoMMi.ssroN o^f. II By Baxkson Stock of other Companies. ill. PUE.SCRIPTION OF. IV. What is. I. Broker's Commission on. 160. Where plaintiff, a broker, sued for a commi.s.ion of one percent.on the amount of a oan which he had undenaken to oet (or (lie estate and Bucces«ion repre.«ei,ted by thecleleml- an , but which he had failed to obtain-//eW, ll: n!'248!1"c.1879.- ''""'^*^" " ^''«''"' '' n. Bv Banks ON Stock of other Compa.vies Ifil. The delemlants held a larsre nuinber of Phuresof the capital stock of the Montreal City Passenger Railway Co as security for advances 1 which hey had made (o plaintiff, and had notdied him that they were about to sell them, p aintilfhemg m.lefault to repay the advances. J he action was by way of mjuncti.m to prevent nnL-"*! ■'/"' ""' *■'''''"'"'' '"'''>- "''■"' "'at the liauk had no power to advance money on the security of sliaren in an incorpoialed trading hT7\T'1' C. ;J4 Vic. cap. 5, sec. 51- JJcld, that the bank hail the nowev and .ac-'on iiu, J4 Li. t. J. I,i5, S. C. 1878. the District of Richelieu, on a bond or obli.'a. tion with hyp,.thec lor «1,858..H:!, money 1^ t and interest from 1st July, I8(JU to 2 ' f^^';f'7\''^';>V''^^eofbondat-G'p;rce;,t'^r;;;n tliat lust date, at 8 per cent. .$4;U.22 were claimed lor interest, and $13.20 for the cost of he deed, enregistrat.on, and the addition of a ir, fn ".'i '""'^''";- '"'''"'■ '^'''e defendant pleade.1 that he wasadjudicataire at a .sale, and at as a creditor, he had a right to retain It puce on giving security until the judg- meut of ,l,stribution. There was no ques- 011 either as to the evidence o r as to the ■gilt ol the appellant to retain the price ir he chose so to do, on giving security; but so, bu that he desired to pay the price of a.i- la II '"»'.' '"'i ,""' '»^'nS "'<■ -'loiiey to do so that the sheriff lent him the money, and took a personal obligation for it. But the loan so I le e to appellant was a fiction ; apfjellant su!,! H! had paid and the sheriff ackiiowle.iged to have received the price of the adjudicaiion VI bout any nioiiey pa,s,-ing at all. The court nnnlTi "''^'""*'"eii the action, and condemned appellant to pay the interest stipulated in the bonil, on the ground that the sheriff might i,ave taken the money from the appellant, and, havin-' « one 80, might immediately have given hiiu back the same money as a loan at interest: that since he could .lo that he might by a fiction hni'\""f'""' 'J';''f"«e "'itl' the payment and tn.l It um, without appellant dispos.se.ssiiK Innisellot the money, or his even having ha3 It to pay— //eW, reversing this judgment, "lat even if the sheriff had th? lega right to lend sheriff, had received, m order to make a profit out of It for himself, substituting his personal responsibility as an equivalent for the substan- JHl deposit m hi,s bauds, it is perfectly clear that he had no right to give the debtor a receipt tor money wliicii he ba,l not received. In tlie ca^e of /jcvmAv/ and Th, Mayor, etc., of M• have given hitn loan at interest; niightby a fiction, the payment and llant dispossessing even having had liis judgment, ''lat egal right tc lend ley which he, the • to make a proHt Hing his personal It for the snbstan- is perfectly clear le debtor a receipt receiveil. In the ■yiir, etc., of Moil- mrt, reversing a irt, that the certi- 477 LODGING-HOUSE KEEPERS. ficate of the prothonofarv to the effect tliat the Corporation of Montreal had depositeii the necessary funds in a case of e.Ypropriation, the fact bemg that the corporation had deposited a protnissory note instead of the money, ,ni-i. duilhiunie v. (.hr/iuni/ion of Co. of Druimimii,!, 7 K. L. %-2, Q. 13. L-iTU. 11. PoWKRS OP. 2. J he Mairistrates Court has the satne ri"lits a.sthe Circnit Cunrt witli res|iect to adjoTirn- niPiits, and the heiirin<; of cases at adjourned «'■'":"•, ,;'^'/-''''''" 't Cuvpomtlon of the Co. of Bwjot, 7 R. L. ;i(JU, Mag. Ct. 1875. MAlNMORTE-,See SEIGNIORIAL RIGHTS. ]\IAIXTENANCE— K%e ALIMENTS. 1. Op Parents, see CHILDREN. •La part impow^o a cliuque corporation locale con ftittic line deitp [.nyable par ellc au conMl du comte a apres les conditions et aux termea determines par oc Le montant du celte part ou dottc est percu dana la inuiiiul|ialite localf cunime le.s taxes locales sur tons lea iJiens imposablf'h aftectes 4 cette taxo sans nu'il y suit fcesoui de faire dautres reglements ou ordres 4 cet elTet. I'.n cas de retjis mi de negHgence de la part de la cor- poration locale de payer la par' qui lui ete impoKie, elle farticlJ'i«l.'^S"ATb.''''"^ ''"^'' """'"^'^ """•»"*« ^ l.c pniement de." taxes municipalebpeut-Otre egalement recLinie par niie action intentee uu noinde la corporation devaut un jnge de paix. la Cour do Ma,.ist™t m, la Cour do circuit du coniii- ou du district tiiiit oontre les pSntes il mT''"'''''"'^ '*"" """""^ '*" porsonnea MANDAMUS. MALICE. 480 I. Evidence of. .^. Malice and want of reasonable and pro- hftlde can.se may he inferred from the acts, c,,,,. duct and expressions of the parlv proMeciilin- as for example the existence oi" a collateral motive snch as a resolution on his part to ston the plaintiH's month. Lcfonlainev. Bohhu: \ L. i\. 2()(), S. C. IST.S. ' ' 4. Jiut, held in another case, tliat malice ainl want o( prohahle cause are coiicliisivelv (lis- proved hv the conviction of the plaintiff, llena- han V. Gerikeu, 1 L. N. 2(i7, S. C. MS MALICIOUS INJURY TO PRO- PERTY. r. Pi.EA Oh- TiTi.K R.vRs Criminal PRo.sKctr- TioN FOR, see CRIMINAL LAW. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. I. Da.maoes FOR, see DAMAGES. MANDAMUS. I. And In,ui.vction not in Principi.k or Tl'o v'^''"'^ '^'^'"''" ""^ SA.ME, sec INJ UNO- II. Does not Lie to Enforce Private Gov- TRACT. III. Grounds of. IV. Right to. V. When lies. II. Does not Lie to Enforce a Private Co\- TRACT. 5. Writ of inan.iamus in wliich the apwllant set (ortli that he wasjranc fenancier, letuwi feu et lieu, at Beaiiharnois, and that since 18(38 lie has occupied pew No. 74 i,i the Roman Catlio- lie Church ot the parish of Beauharnois on payment o( ten dollars a vear ; that according to tlie u.sajj;es of the church he is entitled to the continued possession of said pew so loni' as lie remains in the parish, and should pav the annual rent therefor; that although ready "and otferinB to pay the annual rent respondents have taken sftid pew from liini and leased it to another. Appellant asked that lie be reinstated in bis pew and the sale and re-lease thereof be declared null, and (Jamages be awarded to Iiim— //«/(?, that the riglit claimwl by appellant was not a right ol a public nature, but resulted from a private contract, and could not be enforced by rmindaniiis. RobiUard & Les Curi et Mcuyuil Ijns de I U:.arrc ct Fabrique de la I \inns.ie de St Clement de Beauharnois, 8 R. L. 03, Q. B 1876. CE. 480 rensomiMe and pro- ;(l fniin the uots, cori. he party prosecmiii^'^ :eiK;e oi' u colhiU'riil I) on his part to .stop fontainc Jasp, tliat malice and lire concltifivelv (iis- )t'the])laiMtiff. Jicaa- '7, S. C. l«7rf. JEY TO PRO- Criminal PRos^:(;lI. LAW. )SECUTION. MAGES. lUS. IN' PniN'CIPLK OR SAME, see INJUXC- ORCB PlllVATE Cox- RCE A Private Con- vhich the ap|x-llant ■inanricr, tenniitjm tliat since ISGH he tlie Roman Catlio- )(' Beanliarnois on ar ; tliat according le is entitled to the pew so long as lie Jiild pay theaiinnal ready and oHerin); indents have taken ised it to another, instated in his pew lereof be declared ed to liim— //e?t"/, ipellant was not a U resulted from a not be enforced by .« Ciiri ef Manjuil e la I'aroiusc de St II. L. G3, Q. B 481 MANDAMUS. III. GnoUNDS OF.* 6. Mandamus does not lie to compel a rail- way company to deposit an amount uwiirded for expropriation by arbitrators. H(iiir(/ouiii v. Montreal, Ottiura & Oivi'lcilal liuiliiHOi Co . 21L. C. J. 217,8.0.1876. IV. RlGIiT TO. 7. The plaiiititf being assignee to the in,sol- vent p.state of 0. L. under the In.solvent Act of 1875, presented a pelition in chambers alleging the in.solvency of (). L., and his appointment as a.sflignee. That the defendant, in his qualitv of secretary-treasurer of the coiiiKv ot lieau- Lariiois, ha i advertised for sale, atid was aliout to sell for municipal tuxes, certain lots of land as lieloriging to the said iri.solventi that he, the plaintiff, in his ipnility of assignee, iiad also an- nounced the same lots for sale; that by tiie in- solveny the lots in question liad pas.-ed into the hands of him, the assignee, and that it was the duty of the defendant to atwtain from any further proceedings with regard to them, and to send a statement cjf the sums due for taxes to hini, the said a-signce, and finally tiiat he the assignee had noother legal means"of preventing the sale of tlie lots in nuestioii but by inanda- »(i/,v. Conclusions that defendant beor'dered and commanded to refrain from selling the said lots of land, and to transmit to plaintiff a statement of Slims due f.r taxes on account of .«aid lots of land, ami that a provisional order be granted enjoining defendant to desist from all further proceedings in regard to the sale of the said lots of land, etc. On presentation of this petition the jndgt in chambers ordered the issue of the writ dem.inded, and granted a provisional order to defendant to suspend his proceedings, llie same (fay the plaintiff filed his fiat tor the issue of a writ of " mandamus," which issued accordingly, and was contested by defenibint— Ilelil, that wliile a writ in the nature of an in- junction might have succeeded a writ of maii- da.iiiis whicli was to order scjuiething to be done woulii not lie, and must accordingly be di.s- liarged. MoU'aU v St. A ntviir, 9 R. L. 439, S. C. 187(). V. \Viii:\ LIES. 8. A writ of mandamus will lie to compel a benefit society to restore u member illegally ex- makiti.mk law. 482 m * In tlie fDlldwing cn«p.«: 1. Wiic'iicver liny corporation noplecfa or rpfii es to miilfc any election wliicli by laiv it is bound to iiialii', i r to recognize siicli ot its nii'iiiljors as liave bo.oi li.caily ctiopcu orelccti'il, or to r instate siicli of its ijiciiibirs as may liiuc li.u ii leiiioved witli lit lawCiil cim.si'; 2. WliciieviT aiiv p.rsoii lioldiiip any ollice in any cor- poraiioii, public body or court .£ iiifi'r:or jnr:5diction omits, ncfiiects or refuses to peitiirni an-' duly tielooBine to such oilicu or any act wliicli by law" liv is bound to pi'rf.riii; 3. Wlienever any lieir or represpntntivB of a public otliccr ondts, refuses or iieslects to do aiv act wbicli a.s eucli bfir or reprcstntalivi- be is bv law ob'liiied to do ; 4. In a.l cases wliiTu ii writ of ihiiiidanuis would lii> in ftnirland. Aiiv person interested iniy Bjiply in tile Kujieiioi tdiiri or to u jiid;;i' in v.acation and obtain a writ coiiiniiniiiiii^ tlio delcirdaiit to pcTfonn (lie act or duty required or to sliew cause to the contrary on a day fixed, iuaa C.C.I'. I peiled for non pavment of ibies. Lupiirre v, L'ri,;<„iS/. J,.,,/.), Si .)/o,itn-ord~hips iiameassessors, an opinion on a nautical point given bv Canadian assessors may lie overruled. ■ "AVixa Keit/i," T/ie & Tne " LaiKjxhutL';- 3 Q. L. U. 143, V. A. C. 1677. II. Collision. 10. Wherethere were iwosailing ships, oneon tlie starboard and the other on the port taclf, and the firmer bv a rille of niivliiati^jn haviin'r the right to keep her \\\i\—H,ld, tlint the former was, notwithstaiiding in a case of im- luinent denger, bound to give way, and lor iiut 483 JIARITIME LAW. doin. so condomnf-l in ,ia.n«,u;p.c. nn,! mMh. 11. Tlu. pn.priptor of u vessel uliicl, l.ns ^Mlt(.,v,l .|,u„a., ,■,,„„ ,, ,,„|,,,i^,„ ^_^,^^^,^, 1^^, '(■«lfil oil tlie part of the vessel siiirerii,'.. i.;'iMM-.. will have „o reooMrse in .lama.res': 12. A steam tiij; procee.IiM!,' doivn fl.e River h.Uwrenee met two !,an|M,.s, an.l in passin- l-tween .l.en. came mio ,..,l|,.i„n will, .,„" Jvl.;..p.|,1e,ll.erheln,-/A7,/, tha, UulU ^Z 111 .11 K the tiiir lurnut keeiini-uiit ,.f the wav an. the hamne lur nut Ueepinj: hercmrse. The ''W.'..,v,;!Q.j..K. ^l.V. A.C.1/7' ... A.hI /,./,/, also, that a.lmissiuMM of u ni.istci ul a siiip beinj; pertinent are evidence apiin.H the owner., ultl,„n-h nia.le after the collision an,i extra urtieiil. .., hi.t the parlv ttHeefediniu-pve counter evMenee. //, " 14. ^V hen a port-tackiMl vessel has thrown Leivelf into ,.tav8 and heconie helpless, sh" onvht. neverth,.|ess, to e.xecnte any p'actu'ahle inana.nvreinonlerloKet. „ntof the wav of a starhoanl taelced vessel ; and a slarl.oard tluke ve>sel when apprised of the helpless con.lition 01 a vessel winch hy the ordinarv rule of n.i' gallon on-ht to ;;et out of her wav, i. 1,„ | ,0 execute any practicahle manuMure whicn would tend to avoul u cAlWum-JIe/d, thai l,„th ve,s..els were under the circuni-tances t„ |,h„,ie 1.0. Where both ships were to hiame for a collision which occurred in Canadian waters- -//'•/'/. that an A.:tot the Parlia.ne.it of Can- ada whuh precludes either tr,.m recoverin.' Its dama-e was operative, altliou-h the A,)" miralty rule which divides the loss prevails i, t|Mj^land, and has been recently applied in a case he 1 my Council, but without the Act* bei,,.' Iiroii^'ht under special notice tliere. " Fliza V^l XT r"n "^J'J"' " J^"'>!M('U<," 3 Q. L. U. nnlLf ,'! "\'i '"''V^ «"l'ision, the fault beinsr nutiiai, the Adnurally rule will appiv us between the owners of cargo and the delinquent ships ioietv.^' lb. ' "'"'' ''''•' ''"■^"^'■■'^I'l'^ lor'u 17. And on ajipeal to the Privv Council where their Lordships name assessors, an opi^ nion on a nautical point given bv Canadian assessors may be overriile.l. I/> ' lis. Where a tug w^is seen from a barque at anchor crossing her bows, an.l >o surldenlv stop her speed that she allowed her tow to drift" npo, and col i.le with the banpie, aii.l there appear- ing no lanit in the tow, an action bv the I. roue against h,,. „„v ,he cau.se of neglect in the tn'- ?tn'^.'j::'iS2ir(^;i';t'Vs7i'"""'"''"''"'' 19. A schooner descending and a steamship ascending in the channel of the .St. Lawrence, the lormer changed her course belbrc mpetin<' am III time to enable the steamship to keep on of her way-//,7,/, ,n a ease of collision tliat the steamship was in fault tor not doimr so MARITIME LAW. 484 aUhongh had the .chooner not changed her o;urse each might have gone free "r„J ^0. Where a steiunship overtook and sunk a Hchooner-//,/,/, that th'e sc ,ner was , ,' "'"I" tor not showing a stern light, b„U ",< Hieamshipwasinfiult for not Iceepii ,- out .fi.Sr::iim^'S:ns:-;x;::g'';..\;s^.t '/ I"''- '•iimiini; free, and the fog wasso ,lensc tl a their hgh - respectively cot.l.T be seen but w- >' '■o.M lineen to twenty seconds beli.re tie c lliHion-//,/-/, that tlie speed of the ve.s.'l ^Ti'-mXTif'x:^,:' ''"'''" ''''''' n. ma, uNo, that the maritime law recognize.s no lixed rate of speed for vessel' ^uilmg It. a og and that where a vessel s in a jrSrJt::i:;;vSx--r::!;,rz:'::%.s f-'ht iiidicatii,.- the approach of a sailing Te'sel "eie seen and lost si^ht of until too late to avoid a collision_//e/,/, that thesteamsh v," '" 'ault or an msullicient look out and too much iSo. ^ "'"'" '^''''' " ^' ^- "• ^'^ ^ ' ^ c L'4 And h,-ld, also, (hat the steamship was "hie or consequential .lamages, unless "„" •he releren,:e she could establish gr„ss n'.'d fjence or want of skill in the sailing vessel, and that the rules for the injuring to stav bv tie o'I.'.'.si 'T'\r^^ 1'^ ngidi/ applied iV occasion should so require, tb. a,:i'';i,l^''','r''' ""■"■'''^■"""■'•«. one on the starboard si 1 t le^ ,?' ''," ';" P?'''."''^l<. >'anie into colli- r.::'K.itn:c:'i£r^^^^'^<'^^«'^ 20. In the case of a steam vessel Ivinc^ at anchor upon ftiichorage ground while UMng'her .'HI and shewing two white lights, one upon her •"'■•'Mio^t and the other at the gait aft, a-Mi,. eaeli ,1, an oblong lantern-//../,/, that a sailin.' e.ssel which, misled l,y the whistle of ainther Meainerin motion, struck her was in fault fjr j-'oing' too last an,| that the h.dits, although not '11 glolMilar lanterns as directed bv the "Act [•'•.-peeling the navigation of Canadian waters " leing e,]ua ,,, power were a substanlial en - III. C0ST.S IN Ca.si;.s U.vdkr. • Of r.irliament of Canada. hi d-;/,/,/ that he costs of reference to the I gistiar and merchants should be borne bv the '=''' '"'.although his suit was lor s a .;^;nn ot which the amount allowed and in e res lu-ivon would be less than a thirl . " AV »Mntnn," Tlu; 4 t>. L. II. Ao, V. A. C. LS7S ^.^. 111 a case of collision, the registrar an.) en^hanj^, bavin, found that thet'e.'^as a, oJ n d /L'r';v^ . r '^"^ "'''^i' ""■ '•'""" ^^^^ tlie claim, either as preferred or amended, the E LAW. 484 MIT lint clinncrcl 1,(.|. ••>;i7, V. A. C. L. It. ovci-toiilv iiiid siin|{ a HChnoiicr Win Hut t.) f^K'ni lijrlit, |,„| ,1,^,^ ' for iioi l(('e|)iii;; out r. " Ci/bH,- The, ■> rJ. 'ccnrrvd in a Cog tie- one lyiiij; to niiil tlie l'(l^' WasM.)l|(Ml-f (||„t iiM lie seen hut win,. spuoihl.s Ijclinv tin. .''|)t'('il iif till, vessel ; "At/i/a," The, j tlio inaritiiiio Imv jf H|)t.|.|| iVir vt..-(Mi.'|,^ llCIV II Vt'-Sfl JH ill a lii,;ieiit CLiiniiiaiiil to isliip asceiiiliiin; the !(l ami I lien u ^reun ;li III' a sailing vt-sscl 111' until U)o late to II llu'sii'iuiisliip was iili oiitanil too iiiiu:li I L. II. 57, V. A. C. the steamship was iiajics, unless upon lalilisli jri-.iss rie.'li- ' -iiiiiiig ve-sel, and I'iii.^' to stay liv the iiilv apiilieij iV tlie lb. neon the starhoanl i^li, I'aiiie into oolli- taiih lui- not keep- 'M'nis liiiijal," The, G iiiii vessel lying at 11(1 while u-'inj; her J-'lil-^, one iip.iii her !ii' yalt iiir, iif^ainst '/•■/'/. that a sailiiij; whistle of an itlier I" was in tUiilt Ijr i-'lit-, althoiijri, im( cled hy the "Act L-aiiailiaii waters,"' I ^-iilistanlial com- \eral JJirc/t," The, u. ijres awanli'd in a " ;%<■ : (I L. i{. •My.\, V. A. C. 1S77. Ml And hehl. that the measure „f dama.'es or the detention of a vessel after a cl.lir the amoiint she could liave earned while u, - employed hy reason of it, lb. V. KviDisXOK IN Cases U.ndkr. ;!1. The court in inariiime case.s will not re- ceive as evidence the de,H,si(i„us of tier-ons prolessiniito he skilled in nautical atfair'^as ,' their opinion upon anv case. '' AUila " The 5 Q. L. U. 310, V. A. C. 1879. ' "' Vr. Il.L-TKEAT.MKNT AT SeA. n.«^niw^''°" '" '"''''?■"■ ''■""■'?«•« to tliP amount 01 MK) lor an a,ssault and ill-lrealmeiit Lrom^ht by the promoter a .sailor, a-ainst the ownerand ina^ter of tlie " lirid^'ewater" an American ves- j^el. 1 he promoter si^'ned articleson the oth .Sei.f list 111 London, and in thcc-mrseof a vova.re to q.iehec the ma.ter attempted to put hi,n i„ ivns, hut tailed, owing to passive resistance Iheienpon the owner said: "I'll hell) the must-rto put you in irons," and haviiMMlisan- jieared he reappeared with a sword l,avr,iiet „ lis hands, and struck promoter several hlows on the head with It to stun him, the more easily to pu him m uons. One llesl. wound was im hcleil, and then the master struck ihe pnmioter. Ihede lence was that the promoter eiUa-ed as an A.l!. seaman, he heing hut an ordimuT sea- nan, and that theattempt to put him in irons wa^ forreli.sa ol duly, and that he resisted and was nil inously supported hy others of the crew ■ liat the master \va.s violently assaulted and knocked down hy the promotir, and that e nuLster acted in .self.lefence , that the crew we e in open mutiny and armed with knives and other weapon.s with which the master was threatened, and that in consequence the defen- Haiits armed themselves Ibr !he pro tct on o f tiKMiLselves and the wile and children of tl?o owner, who were on hoard ; further that the la, - ^'.lage and behavior of the pivnioter durinV e vovage were mutinous and subversive ot'i'ood ';:•;•'• "nd di.scipl.ne and as a ringleader oti.ers t, seamen were by him incited to a refus.^l otd.>(>. Ihe evidence bore out the mutinous 'ti.spoMdon of the c'ew, and of the promote i,' particula,-, and the necessity on the pa of ,1 e niasterol doing somelhimx to bri,,/ hack t , wilh eoV"".' /i''",''J^"'^""''-, ^^-^'i"" dismissed MARRIAGE. VII. I.NTEREST ON LoS8. 486 .i.J. W here interest on the value of the wreck or the period between the collision and the e.xammation of the vessel was not spec, 'ay allowed, there being „o direct claim . ir i . a,^ 't appearing that thei'e was »„ ei,iuv.ale another lorni, an act on petition contestitHr the vT'''; <1 ' "■\('"'-'i'^"lar overruled. " Quebec^' ihe, 4 Q, L. \\. 101, V. A. C. 1878. ^ ' IX. ToWAOE. U. It'a ti.g for a .stipulated price promises to tow a ve.ssel ■•om one ,, lace toanotfier her e .^ gagement is that she wi(| employ competent sk 1 »'tb aciew and equipment iVaionabl^ai q ai^ ;; the object, an, , therefore, where a tug den uei! 'I'li'Ment m skill as to allow the low to collide wi h another yessel-//.W, ,l,at the tncr was n>hle ortheconseipienceollhecolliHion "(ra' //«/«," The, in re, 4 Q. L. U. ;{0G, V. A. C 1878 MxiliRIAGE. I- Action- to Anntt.. II. AtTiiouizATiox OK -Wife. Jll. LlAIUI.ITV OKlIlsllAXU. J V. LlAlill.ITY OK WlKE. V- Natiiu; ok. yi. POHKU OF HlSIIAXI). VII. POWKR OK WlKE. TV ^1. ^'"'•^^I'^'i'TioNs Arising from. iA. KlOlnsoK WlKE. X. Sei'ak.uiox dk Corp.s. I. Action to Axxt-i,. ;«. Action to annul a marriage. The hus- band was a minor afterwards iiuerdicted, and 1 e action was b,-ouf5lit by the curator a ather o( he interdict. Both parties were Kotiian Catholics but were marrieifby a Protes- tant m,n,ster.-//rfc/, that the conk in such case had povyer to ,-efer the question to the voman Catholic Bishop, and the decision of t e i ishop ought to be followed by the court in e- ciii.ng as o the civil effects of the cereu.ony * Lunmie A- Emus, 3L. N. 342, S, C. 1880 ^ u(.. And held, also, that in such case the uar- ttes had not w,,hd.-awn them.selves bevo ythe urisdictionofthel,ishopofthechi„.ch'towhch they belonged by resorting to a Protestant clergyman to be married, fb. '^'*^--t''iit «o'lenn,iVrmi'r? ,^,f' i' """^l^T^ 'Ji"''"'^'.',' "^ :, if, I i. 487 MARHIAfiK. MAIIIIIAGE. 11. AtTIIOKIZATIOX or WlKE. 37 Wliciv a ^yife mir.! ns a ivhiow |)lpn,),.,| that li.T iMivhaiwI waslini...'— y/,'/'/, that slicli,! not r.Mimr.' to he anthoriz.d i„ onlcrh, ho iilca,! ftii, ihat the hiiHlmii.l wo;il,| he or,lere.„„„,/,,„„" . '"'a'^ /'<■'•'•""/'. •■) li. N. lt)0, S. c. IMMO -■ 4" .Action ajrainst a marrie,! won-an ,y^,„„y. .■,. iioi-(itl,(!rwise enter into cnnliaols or (,l)liinfl„i,« u.ile.s u„. |,,,,l,„,„t heeom,., a piuly to M,e .Teed' ,^ '«';'^ ^cxC" "■'^ '''■'""'" ""■'■'•" "'<'/'"«' "K'Ae,-;L,S If, lionover, slie bo separate as to property she mav rio ami MiMl-e a one .,11 ,,cis niid conirnct; e,.nn,.cte itt™ h the U(l,„n,ist,„i,on oi l.er property. 177 C. C ** i,„il.'!.,ri """' m"'"' '" »"""''izP liH wife to appear in give tie i„.co-Hnry uiitliorizatioii. 17s C. r ^ i,..i,Y, '.T'"' .'" ''""''.'i" "''der may, without the author- f" ,,',."' '"■' '"'^''••'■"'1. "Wipale 1,,-iVelf for all that rel uj. to her comni,.ree ; Ki„l i„ sa.d, ease she also hi,i |V ,m iMisbai,,! ,f t|,c.,-e he .■orntiMiidtv hetHeei Ih.'i "\t exprlt',';" im'ni'iT'''' ''"''" "■'"'""■ »•"=" """.orilati,!;,! ..■o.o.fi'"','"'"' .'"■ in'i'r'licted or ab-ent thejiolRe i„«v contra,.';? % "','. (■'" "''»"""■ '" J""'""" P^"''« '""t'^ o" t'o All (ieiienii aiit'iorizatione, even those stipulated l,v nmrria-,. eontrael, are only valid so far as V. ar.L t r. adinnnstralion of ihe wile's prop riv Ihlc (f " "" Ins Vr. T,'^' "'""'"tf" » minor, may in all eu-esautliori,e JhB want of authorization by the husband where it is necessary e,>nslitul(.s a eaiise of i.ullity widcl ,L,tlm," can cover, and winch may be -aken a.lva tae of 1 h *|;«^«//.">,!"»veane.visti„ga„d actual iule?St iu doillg I hefaSSriStc.""" «^'''°''*"'« authorisation of I lU. Liability of Husband. '12. T«3 an action for the lialance of the price of hsi. sol,l, et.t., defendant pleaile,! that a t av ..;;;< of $.J0 which he iLl ma,le ."acco! '^ ha,l heen cre,lilw| toan old account of his wile's previous to lier marriage with liim-//./,/, tint us the parties were se|)arate as to properly, any I'Hyment made l,y the hushaml must lie mv- suiiie,! to he ma,le on his own accnint, an,| ii„t s" v'^lm ^"'"^ '■ ^''"'"^"<*' 2 i- N. V7I, 4;{. Where Iiusbainl and wife are comrnxu,' en l>i,ii.',axu\ the ^ylfe carries on husiiie.ss in her own name the iiushand is liable also lor the ohli- f T\ 7I srci'Sr* * "''"^ '• ^^^'"■'•^' ^ IV. LiAHiMTv OF Wife. -If. A wife Nvho with her husban,! mal<,.s a ''"nation of a sum of money to one of her chil,ren wliil.st en comwunanU witii her bus b.-md, remains liable for one-half of tlie .lona- tion, notwitiislainiing ,she Ije ,subse,|uentlv -eparated jii, iicially from her hu8haii,l as ti property and renounce to tlie community. 45. A wite separate as to property is not liable jointly an^ severally with lier hnsl,a,„i or any part of tlie price of go.KJs purchased '"M a grocer, allliougii necessaries ol lite, if the goods liavenot been purcliase,l by her,selfin he* inisb«n,'i'!lr"l','i ".';,',T"!" 'l'"''''^''''' P™ceedln.i;s wil hout rMld^vu'ho^■nenti!;!'^ ^".V ">' ''«"'"""^'' *"«•'• <"•>""">» ■ c it™, ,,','■¥ "'" I'roPor""" in whirl, tl„y ". • s in Uu aoi .r'"'"'*; ""•»f<"'ty <" ""<■ «'f the eon- or wh t he ha, so f Jfn'i'Sl'etr egL d"be ng Imd'to'the value whtch the object given hid at theS me of he AGE. 488 489 MAHRIAGE. mv llic <'lniiiiuiii cuiilil any iiiili(;iiil priK' |. ion ol hor IiiihIiiiii,| ur it, IIIKJ tilllt Hit' liiiM. ' <'oritt'mali(in.— //f/,/ rent, and wns ilicic' istriition, timt si,,. ,|„| iilion. Di'jioiiir/iiiii V . IIK>. 8. C. IHHO. •■ iTicd woiiMiii Mepnri!/- ', iliifKPd lolicilii,. ,,ii i'Milorsfd liv lit-r Ini- iini "Ciiutliori/iiii.in. iliiin mC the wile wiis ' lin-biinil's ('ndiir>ic. i li. N. 171, S.C IHMO to propiTty (VoiM her itioii lotiiesiilcoi'Jipr Npiziire witliuni I he e of iicr IiiimIiiiii,|, r-ent, 24 L. C. J. 2(17, LND. [ilimce of the price 1)1' leiuled tliat a [mv ,d inade on aucoiin't, ncconni of his vvile'd th iiiiii— //(■/./, liiai ' as to (iiopei'lv, anv d)atid must lie piv- ivn adcouiit, iiiid nut meiiU, 2 Ji. N. 271, rife are comiiiiiiu' m buHiriess in her own .also ibr tlic olili. vzina V. Lcfehcre, 2 huRband makes a ey to one of her ^ntf witli her hn.-i. e-httif of the dona- be siibseimently er husliand as to the commiiiiilv. '•., 21 h. C. J. 218, o property is not witli her hiisbiind f gOLKJH purchased 'cessariesol life, if iiased by lier.-elf in Iproccedlnsswiihout veil ilBlio I'en public perty. N„r can .«lie, ^pt in matters of sira- lefi ted their ooniinen Jrtion in wliidi tliey are (teemed to liave tlier.«ueh lieeeHt lias lie eff'ccts uf the ccim- ■ty of out" (if the eoii- rt has a riclit to be liuotliui-furone-hiilf d being liad to the at the time of the •i'l >"'.. name, a,,,! if they nie entered in her '"^.' '« ;|"-Me in the' mend, V ZXJ -Hi. A wife's property will nut be „mde liable piool of the in-olvenuy of the hu-ba„d, / „- •c c''iHv' ''"'" ^ ^■"""""' ^^ ''• <'■ •'■ -^'•^ J7. If the hiiHlnind is without means the m«Xdd"hll,''r""' ' "--.(epMytne,,,';"' li.m, I, hi d ddH lor uece.ssHries hu|,,, bed Kller tne hn>b:.„d's ,ns„|,,,„ MrQi/./lL rt a \ ■V"'---r.,'/fir., 21 L. C. ,1. .ill, (;, c. I,s77. 4,'< A wile sepurute as to property, who has Ht.pulmed Ml her .,.ontra,= t ul'maVrink e tluu e s liible icverlhelesH lo iniv Ibr ■■rocenes U.n|,'ht by her lur the use oV ihe lumii ■ en ,1 cmily » hen ,t,s proved that she has oJup'o- 9 irL'i/o-s!' cl'ir'iHrf '■'■'''"'' ^■''•'''•'■^-' -i:) An.l m s„eh uuse Mie does not rerpiire to have been authon/ed by her husbund. //, ul. A Wile sej.inaed us to properly ,s „ot "l>Hor the v.hie of iiecessarie'sumihedTo thehunywu.v.nvdais.,iyento,|,e,',|,-b,,,, a d i,e-uod.sureulmr;,'ed to hm, m the books OU.. Ac2.tL. C. ,)..|:,, Q, |{.lH7a. ol A w.ie sepnraieil as to |.roperty is not ;» ' on a uromissory note given for i debt ^>-l. The Iwiiale respondent was sued as ,sr;„/- ...;/«W and as the keeper of a ,,C *'•'-■/"?'""'" -"I'l and delivered. I'jea that neinsa,,dpni.ha..dlhe.oods.and,h:^ "Ik had not anllionzed the purchases. The goods were euarged to the h.sba„d-//,/ - I";vi,,j, m,„n V. .}fn,-cem,, that tiie wile v : QB."i;;:). '"'J""''^^(^-'^<^'an, 2l.n. 211, 5:1. Aetnni was brought against u wife in her leUH led on an olih-alioii f;iveii by her in her ht lived. Jeleiidant pleaded that the obliga- tion was null and vonl bec.tnse a ou.ainxeuu I .iot^,iiorl.a.e >vHlenU anlhori.ation o f us ie .l Snl elV'T''''''''''^"'"'''''-''''-'^!'- '•■''"l^'- HlK mi.st live soniewliere, she wouhl be eon- i^'inned to pay the capital of the obliatL' us 54. Aciion ai;aiii,si a ,vi(e separate as to i.ro ^O; urbr,.adsnppbedtothefan.ihs helms-" t'^ e ' , r '"'.1 "■"^ ^""' '" ''"' '"'-^'""'J 6^;-::^rL.^:'i'.s;'i.t";;;:;;i:'' '''""""- 5j. a wde «e),arate irom her husband as to n2l?. ■' Tr'"" ','"''''' '"'"'« »"■'"■ "'■ "e esJari s icI aM.I lur the lamily of her lin.sband and guuianote lor the price of such necessari,.s h!', ■ 1' o '" ■"'"■'^ "■* endorser pour acul oi>. 1 he personal obligation ol u wife sepai- MARRIACJE. 400 nlove'.bh.'TT''''-'' '''"; ''>■'"'"'-<= 0" "'' i">- ow.be bidon^'inir to ber, for a debt ol her I'lisbaiid.oreveiKd'thecommmiily i;,r i„, .«. ^'^'^A.tr V. J,r„.t 6Vt-„/,r, 3 L. N. ;iH,,8.(!;: l.Sso. V. N .nriiK OF. ■'''• f',^'1 inarriau-e does not r.xist under (he ■I '" t- to ,i reh^rions marna^-e vaii'dir cekJ: VI. I'oWKll OK Hl'SIH.Ml. 5S. A husband surviving his second wile has "o|"m'erto alienate an immoveable w d I /'/■o/;,.«,othe issiu-oi the second wile. h' ncLTr VII. I'OWICII OF WiFK. ■'!'. A wife cannot become bail fi,r her hus- •"""l.a.idwiicieshe has done so and , til the money she wdl have an act i,m to get 'it lack VIII. I'llLSl .MfTlONS Am SIMJ FROM. 'iO. A married wrnnan seized bv theassi'.meo as bel ferred by the h II- I he insolvency, to claimed pr.iperly •■1 1 ■ ','■"■■, ■ •^■■: " ■■" ■"-'OiiL'iii,;,' to llie e-tate :•; iK'Ha.sband insolvent. The evidence show J 'I"" tlie ..roi,erty in question had been „,u,s '■"id, a lew days previous to cousin, and by llio consl,, wasrelrans|erredtotliewile,thewhol.w 'onsideralion, and evidently to save it th ,, asH,.iee--//,.A/, that as it liad not b e 1 , ,'" tnUlhewileliadanynieansofherownVtl "hat she acquired must be presumed to be » c- • lUiM.I anh Ihe meansof her husband, /'ull m/s c.''i^77 ^ ^-"""'^''■'"«". 21 L.G. j! IX. liKiinS OF WlFK. fil. In an aciion for alimonv by a wife livinn. ;M'a't lion, her husband-//,./;/. ,i,a, aw 11 „'^.^ has grounds for demandi,,.' .f/„n;,/io„ ,/^. J '7;l "u alimentary allowance mav claim C a hnvaiice witliout askin- Ibr senaratioi, /' c/n,p,Jlr& n,.,„„lo;„, 1 J., y. 5S1, ,S c IS-:!""*" (.2. Anil the loi/ c„i,J,i,jnl is where l|„. h,,',. hand resides, but if the husbain! keep a co ii'm hn.e in the house the wili- isjustilied m refu. , , lo live with him. It). 1,S8 C. C ° G;i. Where goods belongin,,' to a wife .st/jwvV „■„., were seized in t lie conjugal domicL ort,a.u.sdueby , he husband, ['>y"virtiro a cause mthe city charter makini; "oods .u,d chattels found in the possession of'those "in- Awifecannutl.md Iierself either with or for ho, hiisbuiK olli,.,-»i-.. limn as l-eiiiBcoininon i ,„ ,. ,f, II'^'^ any »i.(;h obli;,aiion co.ilracteil b^ 'r in 'i' v ' '., ^ " quality is vaid and of no ellect. miV h ^ ^"^ 17 < f 1 I lil isMii 491 MARRIAGE CONTRACTS. deMi'il lo the city tor taxi-M niul aHuenRniPtits jmrilo lo xvi/Airr—Jl,/,/, Hmt I lit' jfood.-t were not 111 llif poH«eMMioii ol i||(> hiisliimil vvilliin llic liifiiiiiiii.' ot tlio htuliile. (inrn v. Ci/ij o/Moii. trail, 22 I,. (J, J. 12H, 8. C. IH77 ; & 2 L. 'N. 170, Q. It. is-y. X. Sfcl'AU,VTU).V UK CoiU'H. 04. iHiard I an action for .Hepnrntion Croin bed and hii- 'iiis(!onilni:t ol'tlif pliiintiil ('iiiiiKit lif Mi'l il|) .n II (IcIl'rHf lo till' iiclioM. Hnitnau v. Afr.fitii,,//;/, 21 I,. C. .). ;U)1, S. C. 1M77. (>.>. .V('( 11 in nfiiHiatiiiii lie tiirjis liv a wili' «KaiiiMi li, r liii-Liiiid. Tlit-re uhh no doiilii vvlinltvci' llmt till' will' was I'.vpelli-.j Ijy tlii' Iiii.m- baiiil. h (i|i|ji'ui(',| tlii't 111' (iiii lier into a lioard- ijif; li"iiMi', imd livi'ij .-I'liiuaU'lv I'l-oiii Iiit. Tlie ili'li-iiiliiiit lii'ld liluiiii'wiji'tliv 'roiiiHl that the debt belonged lo the coininunity''whicli the minor had renounced— //e/(/, that although a debt of the community, it was also a natural debt of the child who had lieen coiistiliited heir. rcrnnill v. Klienne, 1 L. N. 471, & 22 L. C J. 210, C. C. 1878. 70. Continued.— K tripartite coinmunitv of property is dissolved by the death of the second wile, who dies without leaving any minor children,and, therefore, the thiril share of the second wile in an immoveable purchased dur- ing llie existence of such tripartite comniuiiitv \Ha.propre of the issue of liie second marriage'. Fraiitueur v. Mullt 'lieu, 21 L. C. J. 288, y.'ij. JNTRACTS. 49:; l)ilt liclil lliiK tlic in ntcNt Imii lii'ci) |iiii II, tore lliiMioiiil — //^/,/^ It WHHriKlitU'j ri'fiuiiU H Id coiiti'Hl, lull iIkk tlit'r itiiil nminlaiiiiil u'ruiiinl (liiit nut Diilv M (;i)iiliM(|iH(iii(;iiislii.,'j of (lie IiiimIiiiikI, |,m It, it HUM mil lliciiili'lit liiiil liccii lent [ly till! I iK'llin- Ills niikrriii;;(i. lie wilf'i liiilici' liuii r i llmt is, hail tnin,,- 111 t" liiiii ; but lliere iticaliiiiKiftliis t'-iiiiN- soivcimy ol tlif linn •'I ail iKJliiin llji' it !\ ITS. (I, ami llicrun- ■Jmpei/ & Court jj »• Arcoitnt of,—,\, uiiiy Willi hci' liiiM- liv whioli she l«- iliiriii},' the tiiiR'lie till' ii-iirriicl uimI lii-r |ii'(i|H'rty, iiiove- -Miakiiij' a K«ii"laii(i ukI (III Ills ilfalli llic (■ liiisliaiiii iu.nr|ci:i(..,| 111 Ill-ill;; sii.'d llir an IcailMii that she limi I'.Hncct'ssioii, iiiuve- ■ t'slaie ul' dfccaHi^d, 1 innjuHre. acknuw- I liaiisii'iToj 10 ile- ensioiis and claiiii.s lolhcr, tlH'decc^ascI, ', thai liy such sule ■■ to exist US it ,|{d |„.i;„v. il,7. V i Ho(,M,,i,.ncdatl^,,.|i,,«,,,,,, ;,,,|,,,^,; /-^^'^ . on where, as expressly ad,i„ll,.d, ll ev Ihe l""ltlie,r donned,., an> ■■•...,•,., as wis V,, MA It Ur AGE roNTUACTS 404 •ia:""evS.r'l'«"'»'^f''*'^""»'e ,1 ! ."''."''''" '"•'•Knind- I) .im-isprudenceof tlH.J>arlianuM,t of I":/ ,"""'""")'':,'"''""■ •«'"-i'i""i .Vi ;, ;, ' n.!' „Y,ri:ir:,r':i;i;,;;"i;;2'"' ■;,''?;"' '"»'■ 75. There i.s no community of nronertv 1„ SZ':!r;ns;;7'^''"'^'-i^^-'-^ per V ',0 lie ,r/?'"'' '^^''""■"""" «•• P''- 54(i.' 8. C. 1H79 '^'^^'"■'' ''■ '^'"Van, 9 R*. J.. 7ti OJ I'artii's Mnvrip,] tci//...,.f n • „. ^!"'"^-"-Act.on tor a" acc^nnfu^lfi J tiujr ,,f tlie H.-:!. "'?:;;": :,'i'' -■■:-"'"" ":/*■. Ji N., was the voiin.rrs r„ mi ;""■ I""' " 'C ";;"': .srv''",''' ,■•• '"« i">v„„„.v 1. 1, ,1"';'' i;:':"' """"I no ""■n..;t:;;.'!:;i,!;';;,»;;;:;,;;-;;|;;;;;;.>. ^""' ""'I thai eoniiMim ' , ' '"'"""' "IKT liie death „( I e Ir m d l '■"'"""H'd "ccniiiii an, ashar.. r////;' ,7 / ' '" "» I0,i{. I.. .lOi, Q. H. is;;,.'"'"^'^'"^''''''"" * ^'-•i', '7. All, I that M,)twit'hHlan,liii,Mhft( ,1,,. , ruwe helween ,|..f..n,laiit and Ki, ," r' '""r 'iiother was cntracled „ ' ', "'""ti ' "^ Ki'miii- -- no cieiyy.:;;;;:'- ' ,: t";:'"; ""•■■! •-'Htu.s, an,| the only prouf ,'f ,7 , '='"' lI'Ht wh„:h culd lenaien ■'''""'■ "'"■' '---■>:•■''-' -diahilaUni,^'^"'^'- "I 'IK' fa,:t thai Ihe children ,11 he If' "'^ -fs;;iS\irr;i'''''''"''''-'"^Sr^^^ i^.SicT.* ^ "" "" ^"'"'^'■'I'f family. 78. An,l notwithstandin,' the (i- . wasconiracte,! in the Un e7l Siai r T""""-'^ orli;;t:,n):^l«':^.t-;:-'.,yproo,- ^;i|utherofpiai,,t,«;wh:;;:L:ai;::f-i • On priiof tliat in im,. n.irisli ,,r .• i- ■ birth-, i,,,Hrriag,.s ami, le.,,',,' .,''';'' I'ley art; l„st, il,e witi„.s.,es. cic c ' '^'^'' "' """"■ wriliiigs, or by * See In this Judsine.it previous cases coueWered. boiiij; iieccfsjrv utthe Beul , r si„„iv ' .""y eviilencn ;;"«i..alco„y,ir or,h;au,urr.?of;ir'' "'*•-■'' '" ""'^t' the same, viz : -ui.iuuiy ot tiio ulhct'r grant. ng i- CVrtillcafos ilniarrlmre bae'i-m ,. i • i of Iior.>.oiis oi.i ,11 i.uHei- (^,,;.,,'u ■ ' "'"'' ''"'I tiuiial clergymen oi- . ■xhkrjc^r^^o'XZ,^'" "","" "* "'« roil, any regi,(..r ofsucli niarr "ii,,"h„n. '' '""^ extracts lairml cerli/ied by the rl,.r t.„,lr,*' ' ""I ','*'" "'' I'ii th imd tlie legal custody ^tll^oot- Sao C U ''""'"' ""'<'" ""^l^lf m \n m '■!" '(9 L ^^-^^^^1 ■; i '"^^^H r ^M l^BBI "f "£ J^^H [ :| UH IM IM ■ 1 P^^^H 495 MARUIAGE CONTRACTS. iiiiinlialiiteil [liirt of the iiroviiice, wliile cnjiajioii in lniiiln'riiiL'.ulicrc tlici-c w.-is wo pricsl or iniiiis- tcr, inajjistriile or ooroiu'r, ami wliere, coii^e- qiiiMilly, no rpfiistprs of civil i^tulilM were kept or known, was Ijv witnessos. fh, 80. I'oiccr o/' Siirririii(/ ('niinui-l. — The rc^- p lent \va< iimrtiraiiX'O tere(i, and the pro- Jierty heini; aliont lo he poIcI under a, jndirnieni m favor of the inortiiaj;ee, tiie a|i|ieila'ril, one of fix <:lnlilren, heirs opposed, chiinnn;: an iiinhvi- ded si.xth in the half lieUin};in,i:to the lieirs. 'J'he II iorlj;a.iree contested the opposition on thejironnd that the rifihts of the cthildren iiad not lieen re^islered in eonforniily with 2()1)S C. Q.—Ililil, rever^in}; jndj;nient ^i'uk. 2 1.. N. l;-), Q. JJ. I,s7«; 007 and 201),s C. C )S1. RnnniriafiDii of'. — Action was hronjiht on an olilijialion made hy a wife joinllv and Keverally with her second hnsl.an'd, the wife liaviiij: siiiceilied. leavinjr her )iidperly toa (diild hy her tii'st niarriaj;e. The action was aL'ainsI the tntor of this child wdio had taken possession of the properly accordinj; to the will. Thetntor Jileaded ihat he hail never acce|)led llie coni- nuuiily liclween the minor's molher and her second hnshand, hut, on the conlrary, had e.\- Jires-ly renounced il on tlie advice of a lainily cnuncd. — J/r/il, (hat the rennncialion could iioi ali'ecl the antecedent liabilities of the wile. Uiif/iiiriii)' V. E/iciiiie, ' L. N. 2Sl,S. V,. ISTS. i^2. Jii H5(i apiiel hint purchased certain real csiale fioir. her biolher hy notarial deed, ill which she ii-sumed the qualities ol a wife (lull separated as to pro|ieilv from her liu- land. Alter the dcalli ol the 'latter she, hv died lielore notary, leiiounced lo the comnmiiit'v wiiich e.\is|cil hetwiMu lierand herlale hiishand. Snlise^ueiitly a creditor ol the hrolher, also de- ceased, seized the real estate as helonj;iim to his ^acallt estate. A ppellant .'rouiid that her tile was had in law and simulated ami frMiidu- lent, anil liiat there was no possessioii--//('/(/, that hy her renuiicialioi) to the community ol' * Till' Imvfnl licirii, wlipii thcv iiilii'ill, nn'seizeil liy Inw nliiiie iil'llii- |iro|.iiiy, rif;lils a.'.cl nciKinf (■ tlip siicri s^iuii ; hill iIim ^ll|■vi\ .iij; tMnisnrt iillij the Ciiniu r. lucre III hejiiiliciiillj piii in |iii»m s-iun in ilio iiiiiiiuer SI 1 liiriii in llir Cuilc i,i Civil I'ruo iliiic, lii'V ('.(;. I 111' lrlM-iiii>-iiiii 111 iiiiiiiiiveilhles liy suotessiiili liiil.-l lie ri'ni.' I'll hy nils nla iii'chuiilinii »i tiiiin Inrlli liic iiiuiic ..I ;ii('liilr III. .i' HI.,; .'t r.'iiilioii.-hi|, lu ilii'iii- ctiiseri, till' 11111.11' lit till' laiiiT, the (lull' iil his iliiiih, mid lastly, the iloi'.: liiiuorilie iimiievcable. 2ul»h C. C. MARRIAGK CONTRACTS. 491] propertv which suhsisled hetween her and her late hushaiid at the dale of the deed of .laniiarv, IW'itl, appellant divested herself ol any titieor inleresi in said lands, and could not now claim the lej^al possession of the lands undrr ihut deed or liy iirescriptioii, or maintain an opposi. lion liecaiise the seizure was .v/jy/c/- non (liiininn cf 11(01 piixsiilciite. McC'oikill \, Knii//it,:i ,S. V Kep. 2.!;), Sii. Ct. 187t). IFF. I'Imi'i.oy.mknt ok Monky Fji-:i,()N(jini; ro Wll'-K. .8.'!. I'laintiir ohtained juil;,'meiit aiiainst tlie delendant liir a sum of iiio.TS'.i.Ol), ami look in execution thereof a properly situated in lov.'i'r town, (.jnehec. The opposaiit, wife of the deii'i;- dant, tiled two iip|iositioiis, claimiii;; hy one i'iL;lit twenty-thirds, and hy the other liflei'ii Iwen'iv. thirds of the property .seized as lielongiiii; to h'cr in virtue ol declarations iri'in/i/ni made hv lier liushand, the delendiuit. 'J'liese declaralioiis lor the lirst-nienlioiied portion were for the emplnv ment ol $S,(K)0 received hy him from her latiii'r luiil mother since, on condition that he shoiilil employ it in the ptirchasc of imnioveahles uf wliicli the opposanl should have the usiifiuci, and the pro|ierly should heloiifj; toiler chilihvii, and in deliiiilt to her heirs on her side ami liiie. 'J'he declaration lor the other portion wsis lor tin' employment ol!?15,lU!0. wliicli the liushan I, tin' ilefemlanl, received li'oni one who liiid eiiieii'il into an ohli,Lralion lo pay and makeover lo the opposa'it hy •;raluitoiis title, and on the coii'liliun that it should not enter into the coiiininiiiiv lietween her ami her liusliand. The defeihlaiii, liy the declarationson which the opi.osiiion \va- hased, said thai inslead of employing these sinus in the purchaseof inimoveahleslie liad investeil them in a property which belonged to iiim, to wit, the properly in question, ainrwhich he luui (ieded and iransli'ired to his wile in consnlera- lion tliereoi; wiio had accepted iheileclaraliuiis. JMil, that such an employment of money lie- lonj;ing to the wile could only he made iiy a special deed of aci|iiisitiiin of" property, wliicli was expressly suhstitiiled for the wile's inoiiey, and that the transler made hy the liushand "to tlie vvil'e of properly which already lielon^'i'il 10 him was simplv a sale belweei; liiisLiaiid ami wile, and as such was il|t'i.'al and null. Ji'n.s.iw Tclii dc JJiioiiir, i; (I L. R. 231, .S. C. Fsso. IV'. IIvi'oTiii:r I'noM Ilfsii.vNi) 'ro Wii'i:. .St. A liiisliaml may execute a valid hy|iotlii'C ii; favor of his wile on his iinnioveahle properly, in lieu of a liypothei uiiicli she had hy iier cuii- tract of man liific, to secure a sum of money 'ii'outiiit hy her al her marriage aii'l reserved as lliiiiiie • ■I .'It.;,. I V > ■ . II V 1 t\\ 111.-1 111(11 ( Ul^l illl'l I I Sfl \ ri I ^^^ jiniiui- hy her in the iiiarriailioii w:i- ■iiiploy iii^ ilu'.-e sums allies lie iiad iiiveslnl 1 Lielonged to iiiiii, to )n, and whiidi he liad is wile in eonsidi'ra- pled thedcclaralii.iiis. yiiient of money lie- only lie iiiiide by u of property, wImcIi for the wile's money, t> by the hnsliand to ;li already lielonged letweei; hilsliand and al and null. Juissw 251, S. C. t.S.SO. sii.vNi) TO Wii'-i:. ule a valid hypolliec iimovealile propeily, she had hy her con- re a Slim of money ia^e and reserved us ajie c.iiitract. Jl'if/iie I': ( 'iinxlniclinii Mmi- L. V. ,J. 27G, S. C 1S«(). lors of an insolvent, the assignee oftlie irtgaj;e given liy the /(' /ii<:iin. The wile, I'V to her linshand lur sliand, the.sa,dJ.F.,.sen., bva ''.7''' "' '''.'nation shoilly belbre their marria-e. 1 lie liiarnaiie contract between the said J P sen., and Ins wife contained a r/u,,..,; ,/'„,„>, 7- h--xom,;,if ni (lie nsmil terms, and al.so a r/anse '/./vV;mr.s.,nlavor of the future wife. The deed, I"'. '"ip''"l'aii"n of whieh was sought by the .'^ .on, in addition to the surelysnip, contained ;,";"""';'"""'. """"'pHrt ofd. ,S , the mother, 111 the to lowing words: /.„ ,///, lj,„„, j, > o/., .vo// n;'h,/,.pr„i,rM,\ ,„// h,,potl,'). An oidigalion made by a wife to repay nioiiey advanced lor her husbamrs use is aii a'solnienul ity and even a representation by l"'>vile to the lender that the money was to r lersell ,l,.e.s not altect the case. L'/mmme y. tdi/le & ('»•., I L. N. :i40, S. C. 1878. VI. RkGI.STUATIOX Of. 01. Where a donation in a contract of mar- riage was Hubject to a prohibition to alienate- IKOI, that the lion registration of the contract did. not deprive the donors of their droit ,/e 6,is.-',ai/tjc JMsire & IWro.sl, 1 ],. N. MO, & 22 h. L. J. u(), S. U. H. 1878. VII. KENt'NX't.vno.V BV WlFK. 91!. Action of improbation against a notarial °''''.~""V caring date the 2Gth .laimarv, lf'
    /,-,,.. win, icf linsband i;,r debts or obligations entered 'iil'.i by her husband belbre their marria-e, or winch may be entered into by her husband", Inr R c'."l'8'7r ^^"""' ^ ^'""''' ^ ^^- ^'- '*■ 1 "■'' 94. The wile may le.-ally renounce her priority ol hypothec Ibr her n;,n,e« m„tn. ii,onial,:s in (avor of a third party lendiier luoiK^y to her husband on the se.ui'rity of his real estate. U,„jue k CoH.iii,,,,, &, f,,i SoeMii '.''. Y"'.''''''"c/'"" dc M„ii/,in-i//,; 2 !,. \ -.WH ^^ lie.iuiud k Mann, It [,. M. H;{,)^ ^^ 24 L C ) 9."). But where such third party waive, his ngiit 111 lavor of another the priority oftlie Tmwr 'lb''''' ""'''S'"'^'' other claims of the 3i 4"; 499 MARRIAGE CONTRACTS. VIII, Rights of SruvivoR. 0(>. Plaintirt'wasthewidowofA. B. ; slie was niarriwl to liiin on the 8lli of Jiiiv, 18olt, and tlic.v had a contract of miimajre.Mii'iiilaliiiK that the IV slumld In'n ciDiimiiiKiutiitlc liii:ii.'<, and that the survivor slionld have llie hie enjuvn^eiit td' tlic pronerty of tlie pre-deceased, it 'there were no children horn of t|ie niarriage. In An^mst, iW4, the hnshand died, leavinj; no childl-en ; and the phiintitr hrini:s tliis action lur tlie whole atiionnt in principal and interest of a ncite or ohli};ation m hnrc/, madv Iv tiie delendant on tlu' -Ith of Noveniher, IHdli/to her linshiOMl, to "Incli tlie delendant pleadeil that he <:ave the note as alleged ; hut that it was understood that he was never to he calleil ujion to jiay it; that i m lact he got a discharge tiie verv siiriie dav, i tor A. li., (,n that ve-vdav niaile his will helbre I the same notary, leaving to the detVndaiit all I niniieys, wiiether in cash or notes, due to him I at ins decease, and appointed him his executor. iiy a second plea he pleaded pavment and com- pensation in various wavs, hv a cheque, hv tioaril, and otherwise; and, thirdly, .as to the thirleen years and nine niunlhs" 'interest, he pleaded prescrijition of evervlhing accrued later than (iv^ y-i.rs after the CJde came into force. Hi/ the r(-*/(7— These issues raise several (oies- tiyns ol law and ollact. l>t, as to theelfect of the will: Could it revoke the siipulatioiis i-l the niarriage contract? Art. 452 of our Code* i.s Identical witli Article 5H7 ol the Code Nap which IS commented hy Proudhon, vol. 3, No. lO.iO. This was cited on the ale of land made hy he'r late hushand some years nrevious to his decease without relerriug to lier rights in the conimnnity- I J/tt,l, that she coiihl only he collocated li.r one lialf of the amount claimed. Aiiiiot v. Trem- 01(11/ it Ji'eid, 2 L. N. ]%, S. C. 1879. MAELIAGE CONTEACTS. 500 IX. Riiii.TH OF Widow. 98. A willow may sue iier.oonallv and a« tutrix of her children for dehts due to t'he communiiy helore the expiration of the delays to deliheral'e on the acceptance or renunciation of the com- n 1 ;iity if she lias niedilled with it (si elle .V <.v/ immhefic). Hui/ v. JIanih et cL, 9 H. L .Vn, S. C. IS79 ; i;U7 C. C.» X. HlOFIT.S OF WlFIS undkh. 99. Action for $400. 10, claimed hvpotliecariV for five years ami the current year of a life reiit (treated m favor of the iilain'tilf hv an aete <,{ doiialion which shehad executed to iwociiildien of Ihm- first hushaiiil. The iinmovealile which whs the Milii(ct of the donation was translerred liv l':ie children, donees, to the second hushaiiii d| plaintiff, wiio had in turn given it to the defen I- ant, suliject to a lile rent which was to cease at the death of the donor, at which period the de- fendant commenced to pay to the plaintiff the life rent stipulated in the first ihed—Ne/,!, that when in a contract of marriage it lias U'en stipulated that there lias been no community of property, that the ivife is to have the free'aii- ministration of what helongs to iier, and that tiie iiiishand alone is to lie liahle Ibr the niain- tenanceof tiie wile and tiie family, the wile inav alter tiie deatii of tlie liushaiid claim from a lliir.l party arrears f,,r five years and tlieciirreiit year of an annual life rent due to her, on an im- nioveahle acquired liy tiie liu.shand duriier marriage, aithougii she ha.* never claimed sik^C rent during tiie life time of her liusband, and ihat notwithstanding Art. 1425 of tiie Civil Code,! wiiicii (iid not apply totiieca.se in point I'lliiiii y. Giieiietle, 7 U. L. 4:iH, Q. B. lvS72. 1(10. Where it was stipulated in a contract of marriage tliat the wife at tiie di,;,solution should liave tiie furniture coniained in tlie iioine whicli was tiierein descrihi-d, and during the marriage the hou.se and furniture was .sold and a new one purcii.ised and new furniture put in it, arid tiie wile at tiie di.s.soliition of tiie marria-'o claimed the new furniture in place of that iriven to her hy the contract of marriage— //eA/^tliat she had no title to it without a new contract to thhl effect.: CaliiUk Hutckeite, 7 R. L. 5i;i, XI. SiRKTYsiiii' or Wife. 101. Action hy plaintifVfor $2570 and inter- est at twelve per cent, on an ohligation signed hy nrio,?,« .w .1 " '""'""."•'»' f"> t» "ttft.l.cd by I,ran..ho« or 10 .Is al the moment nhcn the iisiilidct is onem.d |ip. I. ig to il.c usnfn.ctuury. TIkwo i„ ,l,e sameeo ,1 , ,", .nt the I loment ulien th« usiifnict cea.^te.-, h..|«ng to th" im,pr„;tor without re,', miieii^e ,„. eltlier ,«i,l'. 1 r |)l<)UfilniiK or HowiiiB, |,„t also witlioiit iirejiKllce to the .';;'■.";,'"';' . 'IV '""?" wl.i<.h mny l,e acquiV..,! by a farmer i im ..V' i.," "T "' ""''-■"mmoiiccmeiit oi ut the tcrmliiution of the usufruct. i(M C. C. * 1 he w fe who ba'i m'itliPr miule nn inventory nor reii, uncMl within th,. dHnys ;,l,ove prescribe,! or efan d 1.S not tlieretore preclude,! from d,.iuK «o; she is, ou tli" con rary. kMow-m to ,1„ »,, s„ Iomk as sh,! 1,„« nk itu,. ! m,vldle,l or has not acted an bHiu« incommunltv: but Me can be stusd as being in community so lon.riis sho iHs „,,, ,-,.no,,nccd, ami she is liable for tlu. ..osts in" 1347 ('•! V "'' '" ""' ''"'" °* ""'''' '"'"'"Ciatioii. i,.n M ''™ ',''" ""'•'• ",'';' '" '"{'"■'•tcrt n.ito property, \m latter, U|H,u th,. deniuuil wbi :h his wife may moke or m','!l"/l '." !?j'^?;'l»t "." "f tliP 'mu-riage, i,, boun/to pivo up only the Iruits which are then cxisilus, and i.s not ac- countable for tliove winch u,, to such tim,. ! .y" b.l consumed. 14^0 C. C. '• t Conflrmlnft S. C, riilel Dljj. p. 818, Art. 321. 'ONTEACTS. 500 I 601 MARRIAGE CONTRACTS prsoiially and a« tutrix tiiii' to tlie coiiiiiinniiv lie delays to dcdiliei-iiie uneiation of tlie cdin- lli'd witli It (n ,,ii( Hands el c/., 9 R. J, C* IlKR. ilainied liypotliecnri'y cr.t year of a life i-cit ilaintitf |jy an ar/,; i,\' I'cnlcd to twocliil(ii(.„ MMiovcahle wliiclj hus 1 wa.i IransU'iTPd Ipv le st-oond liu^haiid ("i| riven it to tlie dcfcii I- ivliiijli was to oease at which jKTJod tiie (!e- y to the jilaintiH tlie ir.-t deed— //e/r/, that larriage it lias lieen I'eii ritiooMuniinitv of to have the (h'o'ad- n>r» to her, and that liahle lor the inairi- faniily, flie wile mav ■-liand cluitr) tVoniii years and tiieciuTent liie to lier, on an im. le hiisliand dnrinu i never claimed sik^C if I'er h\isband, ami 142r> of the Civil to the case in point. 4:i8, Q. n. 1872. ated in a contract of e di.-soliition slunild iined in the lioiise '■d, and diirint; the ■nilure was sold ami lew furniture put in ition oftlie marriage I place of that given arriajie— 7/cW,' that t a new contract to ^helle, 7 K. L. 5!:!, )r $'2')70 and inter- obligation signed by iirto nil invpntorv nor e pre^iciibeil nrgr'nnlt d ohiKSo; sheisi, 4.n tlic f as sill! has not iiiliT- iiR ill cuiiiiiimiliv; but nullity »() long'iiN nIib ialilu for tlie costs in- of sucli leniinciutiun. od as to propprty, Ima y to liprhuslmnil, tlm ''■ '"^•' "'"'^ heneti. MASTER AND SERVANT. 502 of the agreement/ and that as he had not P'oye,, that he had been unable to l.ta ;uohersituaiionaiidhad .ulh.red damage'' e MARRIED WOMEN". I. Action Ag.\ix,st, see ACTION. CH:\NGiif ™" ^''''' "''' •"" ^^^'^S OF EX- Ruoif coJiVKl:cS i^'^'"'^^^' ^^«- MASTER AND SERVANT. -ciioN- ny Skiiva.nt i-or DiaMisSAL. IJkskhtiox ok Skhvick. J)l.'iMISSAt, OFSKI!V.\Xr. l"-i.XTlt.\ ItlvMfXKHATIOX. isTEneiuiT.u'iot; ot- Ttitiis of Engage- I. ir. 11/ iV V. Jii':xT, Vr. LiAnii.ir.-oKMA.srKR. V . LlAIKl.JTY (IF Sl;iiVAXT. V 111. Oath of Mastkij. lA. Pkoof of Ex(;A(;k:.MEXT. I. AlTION- HY SekVAXT FOIt DlS,«ISSAI,. 102. Action for the recovery of $272.20, hein.^ h^^ur months and twenty day.s^salary at t e rat" $.(U a year, payable monthly. Phutui.f a eged that, tiotwithstanding an engage e (leltiidat:tdism,s,sed him without reason belb -e the e.vp,rat,on of the term for which he v- s e gaged; that he had ottered his services t^ |o- f^ndanteuice hisdi.s.ni.s.sal and been tX^d a d consequently had been tbrced to remaii wit'ho empuymeiit, and its ked that the detenda e coudeinned to pay him his wages until the ev P.nuion of his year of e,igugen,ent-//c/?,hat' le had no action for ,-alary not due at he time olnsd,sniissal,butthatl.ehtuia.-ighto,l ,0 an a-tion of damages resulting from The breach 'See Note supra p. 31. DfisfitTiox OF Skrvick. se,T.uit^r!li''r ''''/''''■'''■' '''"""' conviction of a '^P . lit girl for desertion, the girl being a minor . nu.u,g engaged wi,,K,,u Hie cons^i^ i • ,7 ' '"' ''"■'^"ii^'ii^tiun must .s|„,w a '■'K hy written contract uv verbally betbre w tiKsses m oner to ■.lamlf I', /,/ , \ llarteau, ;i L. N. X\\, S. c! 1880. ''"' ^ R4™u.idJ{i?Xic:.'?:r;^iJ';,!;?,l°;=^'«:^' -'"• ,t"o liiboro, H-ii'o liRscontr'ictiMi ,. '^™"''''''"^ "r miiintP J.tM iol cam o bedNc in 'S'fj;''"''''' '"^ " ''''t"" •■iKlit;obe,m 1 hs^^iL^n,"'" ",l'"'l™ «-;.'"M I'^'ve a o«.:s':;?^roc;;^;;i-^'-l^^i;->^;r'^'"''-' ACT nE8PECTl.,0 MASrims A.ND BKUVANT8. (Quo. 4445 Vic. cap. 15.) t.i'i:^S^:;»,^:;^-^;,-«;^'-' his -.^..a,,bP^.b,o^'!^^^-I------i^^ wVdb^tnfi'omirorTV J''"'-""yman or laborer en- I.eii«lty prov"ided"l\!'iL":,;x\^ 'rS ;« ^et r''' '" ""-' connoted may bappc. to bo boyortb^lllnllljllr S onKHKinK or inducing „y a i r ..ti,. , , ''^'"'"^ °J suci, o,>.,.ce be tiabto t. tt^^nlllt^Vro^iSiirlt' til^^ v;^i;;:^;!;^,i;ii-ii»;:f 3S .inifs Kaupmpnt sliiill uivo \tt \..,. , xpiraiion ol lila en- ■vll i m 503 MASTEE AND SERVANT. ill. Dismissal uv Servant. 104. An eniployepenrrnfred foriivear, ulio i« (liMin^sci (vitliont cause niav sue tU- the ino'itli- l.v iMstulnientsof ills .siiarv as il,ev Tall due, UMlesK lads aie set up ami pnned by wliicli llio court ,„ay ,jii.l,L'e of the wliole ainomit of ( amaL'es caii-ed \,y the breacii „f contract. Vi/cr A- lio.,r„ri/z, 2:i I.. ('. .1. Ml, Q. ]}. 1S74- Ai .Vniitrral Cn//oH Co. & Varham, 2:{ L. C. .1. 1!(), Q. B. IST.s. iiotlii' i( it lie hy tlie niontl,, niiil enr. nuiiiili's iinlice iCit V ithoiii ;!ivip,;r Midi notice lie sliail hi' e(iii..i(lenMl iin liav- cefilinl'l'v"' " "'«•'""<' service andlje pu.iislieil ao- ICvn-y ina^ilnr, mistress or omplovpi- A\'\\] cive a like tiie«i-ek .loiitli nr yiMir. wlio;^,. s.rvici.s li,. .Vr .i^lie iiii or M,m' '■■'"• " ,'""■ '!'• '"■""« ''•■'■"'"t. j"nin..vman (.\|iir,itMin of Ins usivciiiHiit, wit uu,' ii(iiii;i., uimn Cull l„','l"l', ,'i /'"■"■■■^'''■■•' '" "I'i'^-l' "'■ «-"i'i have l',„.„ ;.',,: M. Any niiistcr or niislrpss who di.^olinrirci liis or lu-r t i7;',l.'„.M,' ,'"" '7"i".'^ I'j" w..,-,.»asar„R.s,.irt shall incur tiie iipnuliv pinviilrd In the lirsi section. invt ;.^!l^ ""•■"' ■' '",'"."''"•■"* <"• eniploviTasiiiiist whom any i ,, ,m' ,^'.',.''^"''''''':''''* ''-'<"'^"" "i« I'-"- "f liisor hiT a|i|.ii' iiiee, linmestiu servant, .joiinii'vinan nr laL.irer snm".i„"'i ''"ff'T'' "^ aforesaid, for any inisiisa-e, dolert of M luie It, wlinle.sonie iirov.-inns nrfood, or f ir cruelty or vie in! ';;'"•"[,"">;''""'■ ■•"""'• """" «»•'' "'"' '■>'■■•»' o<> .- dollar"; *° " '"■"""-'' ''"' '-■'"-•«"li"g tWei.ty „«;v^"-T <'"?'i'V"'itf"i"iiled upon a oontravenlion oflho n. ",, r",'"'",.'^"* maybe heard and ,l,.terniined he- Ini. oiicjustic o' ihe peace reMclent in the district where «nn',n"'w ?"''■"'"'!, "™"''''"''' "'"' "'">■ ''^ "arraM „r siimim. MS require the attendance of tlie olli'iidw before r..nroi, it sumi 'niied. upon proof of tie- service of such fZidn'r;, ";"■■■ •"'""■■'" !" '"" »'>''«"i^''' "I- l"-ese,ic,. ot "he ntl,'^ ,'■"")" """' «""'I'l'''"f i" a summary maii- mi on the oath of one or more credible witness or wit- !^n;?,'i';:- 1 '"'',"'" '"'''"'''' '''"' • '""I "">y' 'fl"- "(fender bo conv c.ed, condemn such otliMider to the penalty Im- posed ,or the ortence, and in default of pnvme, of be said p-.n.ilty wi,l, costs of suit, with or without di-iav to oe imprisoned ni the common giiol of Ihe di-irict for a }>erio,j iiiit e.vceedliiR two calendar months, mde-s the said peiialtv and costs of suit, toijetlier with the cost of .^pprebension and conveyance of the deliniiiieiit to uaol i'le'iiel'ln /"":'• '^"1 "'J' ? "'"'' '">■ ""■"am for wnie,; tlie defendant may plead the liict of such deserlion mis. coiidiic o.- disobedience bereinbefbre men ioiied; aiid on /', 1.'.', 1 ' Ti''' ■ ,"'" "'' •'' ' '''images incurred in conseim- V I i'^, >' '''''I',"''"'"' ' ""ly ''« .f ili|. < uiisoiidatrd Statutes for Lower f anada, chajiter ,S4 of 29-3U Victoria, and Chap. 20 of 33 Victoria aje hereby repculeU. f v v uo mastl;r and servant. 504 in.'). But a servant, who is (lisclmr;;e(l without Huthcieiit cause before tlie c.xpii-atioii of the term lor winch he was PiifjaKed can oiilv sue for the waj;e.s which are due at the institution of the action, unless he .-^ues for damages for breach ot contract, in which case the lenH, clerks (if , streets and bridges, utors, iKiiiiid kpcpcrs, r ()l!i('Pi> as tlipy ni;u' iitioii the powers veslell CdUdoil may prpserilie I ollieei-s re.speetively, iiu'liellicpraiid ap|)(iint roiincil shall take such jf the odices of city '(I with the collfClioii I'cil may l.liiiik iirdiar, tv clerk, treasurer and .liiresuid saoli ordlter lliey may think at. 505 MASTER AND SERVANT. and the plaiutiir was, therefore, entitled to the ha ance of ns servn-e.s for the year. ]),n„Me ic Cit;/ o/ Montreal, i L. N. 204, Q. B. 1880. IV'. E.KTIIA Rkmi'xku.vtio.v. 10!). In 1874, the Board of Health of the City of Montreal estahiished a smail-po.K hospital, winch went mlo operation in Novemher of that year. Ihe plamtitl, one of the health ollicers of thecitv,juiended there until the first of .Jan- uary, 1,M(,, when he resigned. Having put in a claim lor his .services at the hospital in addi- |0" to Inssalarv as health ofiicer, the C(,rpora- f?<;-; li'in' 'i'''"' *'""(' "•'''"'• '"" '■'''■"■^^'l- Action tor!? 100, heim: at the rate ofSl.^O per nKnith, which was mainlained in the Superior Court, lit m appeal-//,./,/, that if a per.soi, emploved n a particular capacity hv another is eharWd o iierlorm .some duly not theretofore perfonued I'.vhim, he may decline to do it, and then the question will arise whether the new emplov- ment is a\ a similar kind to that which he was eniployed to perlonn. If it is he is bound to ptormit. Au( if the person emploved per- forms the new duty without remonstrance the pre-nniption isthatlhe new work tails within the ,sc(,pe of that which he was emploved to pel form, and he has no legal claim to addiMonal rpmiiiKM-atic,:, .Ji,(lg,„,.nt f(,r $400 ofiered. Q B S ■' "■^' '^""''■^«^. -^ L- N. 204, V. LVTERPRKT.VTION- OF TkHMS OF E.VGAGK- MEXT. 110. The defendants, merchants in Montreal, were sued lor three months' salary l,v their former clerk, whom they discharged on the (itii Movember, 1870, having made an engagement with him in Xovemher, 1874, for three years and si.\- months, so that his time would not'have exjiired until May, 1878. The question was : What interpretation (..light to he given to the terms of the engagement? The evidence of it •/ff.'I "".<'J ''',"'''■ ^"""'" I'V tlieplaintitron the dUth of October, and which the detendaiit admits to contain the conditions of the agreement •— MASTER AND SERVANT. 506 donner tonte mon attention uiix venles dans le niagasin. N.M.-ll sera loisible mix Messrs. A. 1 & Cie. de decider a (juelle saison M. (YUitiier devra voyager. lis se reservent de plus le ) or the Civil Code* .loes not appiv totliocaseofa workman .Mnplove,! by tlu- day to work n, a n.ill, and in .«„.!, case tl,i oatl 01 llu. M.asier w^ll not l,e received a.s to he tenns o( the engajren.ent or the .luention of IVC 1880. W><:"'ere, 10 it. ].. m. IX. Proof ok Engagement. nf^n'o'T'"'''""''^"'"!''"' I'y a railway compopv 01 acivd en-ineei lor the construction ol liK- J^^,wn" '\*'':" ""•'■tial ""itter, nn.) may l,e Q U 18-0 '^ ' • -^^ ^^' ^ ^* -'■ *- J- '•>^' I. Li EX o SHIPPIXi;. MATERIAL. Ship.s for, see MERCHANT MERCHANT SHIPPING. 508 MEMBERS. Kii.Ks i..nK(,n.^.ui.v Passed, AND to wh, ■ , MEM15ER.S OF PARLIAMENT- dee ELECTIOJ^v I,AW. MExMORANDUM IN WRITING— See EVIDENCE. IMATEKIAL FACT I ^ViUT y., ,ec INSURANCE, Misrepresen- MEASURE. T. Of Damages, .we DAMAGES. ■I'. Of Uil, see LNSPECIION LAW. JIEASUREMENT. I. Sale by, see SALE. MEDICINE AND SURGERY. I. Acts Concerning. The principal provi.^ions respecting Medicine and .Surgery are to l,e found in Con. Stat. Can cap^ |0, and the Quebec Acts 40 Vic. can 20 • 41 Vic. cap. 23, and 42-4;i Vic. caps. ;i7 and 38* MEETINGS. I. Adjournment. , 117. Where a meeting of creditors was ad- journed at the call of the as.«ignee— 7/eW, that thi,s wa.s e,iuivaleMt to an aP- 41 was repealed t.y .^7-38 Vic. cap. 128, sec. 3 (1874). a fill of sae byway of mortgage of a vessel regi.-tere.l 11 .del tin. former statute made after the pa.ssin- of the repeahng Act in the form usual under the former statute create.! a valid nmrtga-e. iVyr*r--]{'''J'T^''^ ^'"'-m, 1 L.N. 218, & 22L. C. J. 70, S. C. H. 1878. 119. And it was not necessary to the validity of .a mortgage on such vessefthat she should first be r(-enregi8tere.i under the Imperial Mercliants Shii)|)ing Act of 1854 lb 12() Nor need tlie form I given in the Mer- chant bliippmg Act be strictly adhered to in the case of a vessel registered under C. S. C. caj). 4 1 121. But the mortgagee of a ve.s.sel cannot prevent the seizure and sale tliereof by a ind.-- merit creditor as such sale will not purge liTs mortgage, and will only convey to the nur- ve's^^T ]V''^''''^ "'' ''"' J'"^g»>ent debtor in the 122. A vessel which has been mortgaged by t 10 ow ei in the form prescribed by the Mer- •en registered, cannot be seized and ■ •■ Hi' the consent of such niort>'aa-ee by > -tquent creditor, whetiier registered or ss an order to sell be obtaiue.l from a 190, & 23 L. C. J. 289, S. C. 1879. ■ And that though the vessel at the time -iS»v be ill the actual po.ssession of the ;j '. ■ id tiie term lor the repayment of chant v'.icl sold ■: "nv ' f -e ti;urt SHIPPLXG. 508 fip. 41 was repealed . 3 (1874), a l,ill of !i vessel regi.sterol lie after the pausing ' I'orrii usual iiinler a valiil niortga^ie. irh, 1 L. N. 218, & 509 MEKCIIANT SHIPPING. (lie niortiraj.'? debt have nnt yet elapsed. Ifoif to (,u of the Merehaiit Shi])pinf,' "A.tt" of 1854, but this .iiinsdiciion has not heen extended to tonrtsol\ ice Admiralty, and lielon.'sin Canada e.xclusively to the highest conn of original jnr- '^'!'iy^"-^^>"i'i'«ji")-e& Witrteh', 4 ii. L. K. 08, ». C 18(7. III. Law op. 126. Articles 2.%6 to 2;i82 of the Civil Code having been repealed hy theStat. C. 3G Vic. tap. UK, the law applicable to the monga.'e and livpothecalion of vessels in the I'rovuice of Qnelicc IS now the Imperial Merchant Shippin,- Act. 18;)4, as moiufied hv said statute. J^,L- " w"<' .^-.f""''"' ^ ^- -^''^n^, i2aL. c. J. aoy; 0. L. loiy. IV. LlAUILITY. ir^^Jr J^'' ^^^""■'■•' "f rev.9f/.-Action lor ^0,21,5.89, work and lahordone hy the firm now represented hy plaintitf to a barge called the iMontenac," of which the uiifeiir of the (lefcndiints was the registered owner and pro- priotnr. Ihe declaration alleged that when the barge was received lor repairs she was rotten and vorthless, and by the work done she was reiiihred seaworthy. By theevid^ncc it aimear- eii tuat the repairs were ordered by an,) the work vvas done on the responsibility of the owner in actual po.«session, wilhont the know- ledge of the registered owner, who was such merely (or the purpose of securing a debt due to liiin by the real owner.— JIM, that the re^'is. ^L^.j^rc"i^8?"^- ^'-^-•~. 128. For .nipplit's.— The action was brought recover the price of a quantity of coal IrSm he defendant. Ihe proof established that at the time of the sale of tlie coal, of which plain- tiffs claimed the price by this action, the tow- boat ' Champion," the captain of wiiich had or. (fereil and received the coal, was hired and navigated by the Ottawa and Rideau Foward- iiig Company, and the captain was the employee the company and not of the defendant, alUiongh the latter was the proprietor of the tlian.pion." The sale of the coal lield not to Have been made to the defendant but to the coinpany, whicli was then navigating the boat. • lie de prii nnr /.niil,) „r^f 1.., l.?l l °_ ■■ , riie defendant, could and action dismissed. 1879. not be held responsibJt, Murphy &Molleur,^. C. MERCHANT SHIPPING. 510 V. LiKXFOR MaTKRIAI.S FfRNISIIKI) TO VtS- SKT, IX ColItSK OF CONSTRICTIOX. 121). Qnesti(,n as to the right of a merchant, under An. 2;tS;! of Die Civih Code,* to seize a ship in the hands of a third jiartv, being a pnr- chaser m good faith in actual possession, with the ng'hts of ,1 registereil o»ner, fi.r malcrials furnished lor the ship while in course of con- struction. Ill the m.mtli of April, 1S77, the (felendant, by a written contract, umlerlook to liuild the vessel in i|Uestion for the intervening panics, under tiie superintendence ol tlieira-<.|ii'i' lor the price of X'7. 17 ti per ton ; payable flOtlu, when in frame, XHHIOwhen planked, anil the -aliince when reaily for sea. The ship was liuilt acconling to the contract, and in the month of June, 1877, the defendant, being in want of advances, and in order to secure the payment of the same, gave the intervenini; parties a mortgage on the vessel lor XHOOO, in the lorm i' ^'','l"'„'l"'''f 'Rliedule of the Act of Canada .«) Vic. Cap. 128,t The mortgage so granted was duly recorded with liie registrarofsiii|)pin2 at the pon of Quebec, whilst the vesselwaa tieing built, and alter the recording of the mort- gage so granted the plaintiffs hirnislied to the ilelendant materials (or the building and com- pleting i.f the ship to the amount of $l.Il(;.l;i, I'lr which the action i,i cpiestion was broiigiit ami the seizure of the vessel made. According' lo the contract the vessel ought to have beet" aunched on the lirst of September, 1877. The launch, however, did not take place until the 24th of that month, but from the day lust men- tioned until thedayof the seizure, 'the 17th of Oct., 1877, the intervening parties were in no.s- s'..ssion of the ship. On the 1st October the (lefendantgrantcil, in piirsuanceof the Merchant f'hippingAct of 18.J4,tlie usual builder's certiH- cate, ileclaring that the ship had liecn built (or the intervening parties, and on the same day addressed to the Registrar of shipping a lettei- accompanied by the necessary pajiers. requesticr a governor's pass for the slnp. On tlie 8th ol" October, 1877, the mortgage relerreil to was cfi.scharged, and on the following day a trovern- or s pass for the ves-el was granted to tlie inter- vening panics as owners, the pass havin^r tlie same ctlect uiiilerthe slatuteasa" Certificate of KegLstry." The intervening parties then caused tfie^siiip to be loaded, and by the evening of the tlie foirowifi," ^LbVi?" "'""' '''''''' '"' ""^ P^y^^"' «f 1995 "'" '^"^''' "' '*'''^"'''' "'"1 *'"'n according to Art. fnr'.il'J'P'r*""'."'""',?*!'^'' "'"' ''arl)or dues and peualties for tl.e ndractioii olliuvmi liartxir regulations of reiiairiiiK lattor sincMtlio Inst voya(;p. ^ *' nn i„ . i' "V"'" ''"" '"'■ "i""f">K aiid fiirnisln-Tig tlie shin rj^> r J o' "''■'"'«''' "'"' '"■■ mTCliandise sold by tl.c cap. tain for llip same purpose. * 6. Hypotliccaiionsupon tlu'ship aooordlnir to tlic rulps d|;o arc, in ,i,o ,|i,,.,i ,iiap ol t/.is tith, and in -ho t le of liottomry and Kcspondentia. voyape''.''""""" "'' '"""™"'^« "1'"° "'e ship for tlie last 8. Damagps due to froiKlifers for not delivprinir tlm ?,?;?: f„'"'l'l'"rt by tliPrn. and in reiniburspnie ntZ i'^Ku y ?f 1 ^.r,-''',''. ?"""'' ^y "'•' ''""" "'■ "'i' "'aster or crew^ If tliP slnp sold l.ave not yet made a vov8kp the seller the 'h?.^^'",«''™lf'l''\'''' "• buildinpandPomSetinp liPr.'am" 'He ft- -ons by Khiim the material., have been fnrnislied are paid by preference lo all eredilors, excet hose for debts enumerated in paragraphs 1 & 2, 2383 C O t See Sec 3. • i 5^ n- 1 i '1 .! ii i I. .'ii i vf 'I'r .1 1 1,' 811 MERCHANT SHIPPING. llUii of (),.,ol,er tUo whole of the cnr.'.. wa.s nn t""ml, l.iit h,.tw..PM thohnnrHofsixan,! mpv,.,, bo soixo, as h,.h,„j,,„,- ,o t|„. (lotoM.liuit am us •nlh.'i.- niihtorpnviK-o „„ fho ship' whilo in the possoss.oi, of their -h.htor ha,l no ri.rl,, ,o ^eizo ,t as a-amst tlio Intorvouuv^ pH,,!,-: p„ " cl.asors n, .o,,,! faith, i„ f„ll possossio, ,, w,.h,h<.n.h,sofro.is,ero,io.v„',.s'. ('„M,: I 72, S."c. S. '■ ''■ * ^''"''""'' ^ ^^ ^- "■ Vr. LiKN- yon Nkokssariks. l.HO. Wliere an aRont f,„' a f,„-oi-n vess,-! l,,,. ma.l.- a,|va,H.0H and ,hsl„uv..M.ents for |,,r sV M uc.oMi.t unh l,or o>v„Pr. an,| afror sai i ./o, l.er vova.o ,s hrou.W,. l,ack a wro.^k to thopor ' >. wh.ch she sailr,l, tho a.e„t ..annot trea '1'] '■''"','' ";, I'"- ne,T.-,vrios uri,|,T tho Vioo Vrr. J.IK.V FOR ,S,U,V,\(iK CAXXOT DK TllAXH. FKRItfl). sniW ''V""''' "'1 '^''■='>'">"'"t was ina.lo hv sahors of H sun, ,I,i,. to thorn fin- sal va.ro- 7/^'/,/, heir lion on tho ship was porsomil an.l anil that it ,h'.| not vost in tlioir MILITIA. r)i2 tliat tl inalionaliU>. assi;r,,,.,,s so astoen,il,lo tiu-ni to pro,;oo,i against v\"^T,S''""^' -V""''"««>c,5 Q. L. li- the rniporial Act aro exlondel to vessels hnll.! iM.^in(,ana.la»-hilo in ••onrso „f „„nstrnrtio, Ih,<>m,., u, re .fc lir.rlek; 4 Q. L. H, ;17, S. C.' X. Sai.k ok Vksski,. l;il. Tho jnilioial saleof a vessel, enn-asiomj M a,.,.,,n anro wiHnlH. pnivisions of tho^finper- .1. Morohaiit ShippuiirAotof isr.l, oonlor' h<'»/|f,;»r/«w/,«n.a vali,i.ithMvhn..h cannot i,o ^''l'"l "I ,|„os|,nn l.ya thin! partv who ,|o,.s .o. p.poss a n..;isloro,i title to il,,. s.uno vessH un,| <\h' a,r>n'hn,Mn- may valiiilv o, ., ][ mnro of , ho vessel n,a,lo at tho in'stan'o of 'U'liilorot the person .lolomlant in the jmlicial hsalhon,), such person n.ayslill appear tho ro^iistor to he tho roirislere,! proprietor s c ir'iwn ''■'■ ^ """'P''^' ^ ^-^^ ^^- '-^i l.'if). \uA\\wwlJ,,dir<,ta!re.oKon after a secoml . mnro of tho vos^.l in the han,|s of the sa, p ".■son, n.ay oon.ploto Ins title hv ,,hlainin.' the ^- ■rnalnro of theju. hcial olljcer who ,:on,lm.te,| the sale to the, ioeil of sale in the n,anner : <)iiiroil to olilain rej;ist ration, lb, l;)ii. And an ac()iiisition of the vessel nrele without fraud hy a person inierposed at 'the .H'dicial sale, and a donation niaile l,y the actual purchaser by nieana of such intermediary lb n . V. A.C. l.STi).' 108, of Vlir. Privii,i;oe of JFastkr and Crkw. f the Civil C..lo,t for tho wa-es of tho master and crew of a ship for tho la-t voy- aj^e does not apply to a balance of wajro- for' a reason's continuous navigation on the St Lawrence and lakes, thousrh the master and' crew SI. I, ed articles for the .season, and w,'-o IX. Rk.mkuie.s uxdkr Act. I.p. On a petition for an injunctioM to pre- vent a inorlj:a>roe from disposiii'ir ofa vessel bo- ,„IIfe"~....'",.'*" ,V''*';lvent_ estafo-//,.A/, that pin I MEUBLE^ COIlPOREL-_&e PRO- I'EIITY, Dkscku'tion of. iisin- to an iiLsolvent estafo— //,'A/. that .der sec ,S(, of the Canadian Merchant Ship- iiKj\ot,+ the remedies provided by sec. 65 of DiV, Vc.h'r""""* ^'"*''™' "' ''"• /•'•'■"'■'''ff'^. p. 1016 i )■((/(■ Ktiiim. Note. a iluncliT a temporary nampbvtlio UoBi.trar of ..liinni/ir «,.„ .Pi-' . * /^'"'^'' "'"' "^ iiiteiidcd to ho rcL'ist(.(-eil Tct ;,Ti;'.,''^'V™ \ '" ""•""••'' scl.ed.lo'-ro, hlfi f \\t " ' V"''"'"' "'" "'"!' t'> '"> I'i'ilt or l),.i ,K or V . . !*- " '"V.'i'P y""' o" " dark ground in white iiiuips, tiip number «iven li m bv tlie nroner iieiM^trMi- „f toK^iltirea.™'' "^"-'I'"""' which sL i.s intondod MILITIA. I. LlAUILlTV FOR SkKVICES OF. 137. The active militia havin.' been called on ton req.,-ition of hI.x ma^^siratos in anlici- pation of , not in tho City of M,.ntreal, but in oppos,ii,,n to the opinion and advice of tho mayor o( that city, who did not consi.lor their services necssary to .he c.ty, afterwards relh.- iiiir to p:iy—llM, that whether tiieir eerviees were necessary or not. the nni-istrates haviie'^ actaWitiiin the powers given tliem by stulute,* ,.„*,l'.y 0" atnendmeiit (40 V. c. 40) to the Militia Act £t^;'^;s'i:i;'^;l'te;r'i:;s;^-';^^iix;;!; !:;;ir;.j^;;:;;;r::ii^;:.i^.^i"'-" "-^^ -rvice^i;,^^ A. And wlierPAH ill tlio ca>e of a municipality wuhin V".'^o,^T'nV''^r^ »l„.reon,llor m^Jy^ mail!, ro convoyed, tlip conveyance of such mails miv Im obstrueted by a riot ,„■ disturhan.* of h" ncacp h vond ho nower of the civil ,ulhorili,..s to dea M^it , amf it local or provincial in lt« ori«iM • ' «lionSdh,'.,'rr''thf.w."'i^'''' ""■''"" *''"f '1,0 municipality siiouj.l Deal the wliolc expen.se of preveniinir or retiresH- inii such a not or dialurhinice of tli« xw"-,'? ' '' Ami whereas the cirouniHtancc that the wlioln of such expense must be borue by the muaicipalitj; is calcuiatod lA. 512 13 ■t Q. I.. K. ;i7, M. c! MILITIA LAW. MINORITY. a vessel, ptir(';;lsi( 'visioiH "I'llie^fiiii (' III' Is')!, noniers illc wIlK'h CIlllMOl iinl imi'ty who ,| It' 111 tllC NllMie ves.. 'M' vuliillv o|)|i.is,. •'il llic iii>tiinoe c iiiliuii in the jmlic nmy still u|i|icar 'i-'L-lereil |ico|iri(.t( upr^,(i Q. ]„ IJ. 1; IV. I )CI- 1111 lie llfH ^el, II it'll I'ltl l,y ir. ."J. ■fi.vvvn aCtoi'UHecdiiil le imii(|< of the saiiie ille liy olitaiiiii,;; the licei' will.) coihliieieij ill tho iiiminer le- 1 . 76. of the vessel niiele 11 interposeil at the I iMiiile liy the actiiiil 1 iiiteriiioiiiai'y. J/j, y^lSee PUO- U'TIOX OF. ^. •:s OP. haviiijr heen oalleij ^'islrates in aiitici. )(' iMoiitreal, Imt in iinil ailviiie of the iiiit cutisiiler their ■, iit'terwiirils fel'us- ■thei' their services iia;,'istrate9 havini; 1 Uieui by etainte,* TO to the .■Nrnilia Act lat tlic ut'tivc^ militia il 'lilt tor active kit- any case in whicii a iir ollior emei'jieiicy ml tile power ol' Ihu •iirs or iti antlclpatcil, lliiii out sliall leccive tlieir services are ro- provifio for tlie pay. ollicers and inca so tlio nmnicipalitv 'ii miiaicipnlity within ;r JIiijcsty'8 inail« aro inch mails may be ot ilie peace licyond ,0 ileal with, aiKl not liat tho municipality ireveniing or repress- e pntice : at the wlioio of such cipality is calculatod (lie citv was lialilo. Frn.s>-r & MrEorhmi v. ViUj oj Moiilnul, 2 L. N. 49, S. C. 1,S7U. IMTMTIA LAW. J. CoirnTH Maiitiai.. !•'!«. On n cniiomvi \,y whieh tlie reeoivl ami pi.i.T.;il,iij.'s of a re}:ii„entul iioiirt iMaftiul ol li i.Httery" r«ni„liaii Arlillerv are l.ioit.rht ny^iy <-ni,uniri, and the petitioner asked that tliiMMil-.iient of the saidcoiirt l.v whieh he wa~ '' '[■"""■'I (o I'oily-two days iii,,,nso,n,ient lie ., lathed-//./,/, , hiit niiliiia .,,H,:ers attached to ii Hjillery, thoii;.di holdni;; eoi,„„i>si(,„s i„ „o leCiilar or active militia corps, areco,„,,cteiit to Ht on conns martial of the said lialterv. ^ ,.',';;''7."' '"■''>'■' '' <^ J" H. 200, S, C. iHTi; , 1.1.. Jiiit men, hers ol the volunteer militia are ,j,s„_/„r/„ discliarjrn,] |,v the expiration ot the crrn o l.h<.irenf:ajrc,nent,ainl a court martial is wi liont.inrisdiction to try a man for arts done H"li."ei,neni|y tosnch expiration, and aconvic- tiun under such circumstances will ho quushed on cirliuran. lb. 110. And inati action of damajjes arisin.r o,it Ihesame case-//,./'/, that the expiratic7n of ,'!' m','i!',' ^i •'">-'»>^*''i"''" "la volunteer under tlH'Mi 1 laActpnt.s an end to his ohli'Mtions asa-ohlier, and the liict that he has coiTlinned 111 receive p.iv alter the c.v.,iration of his en-a-e- '''<■"- "i''/7, '""I »■'"' 'l"' '"l>ice ami elau-co/'u'iV^'lr?',™,:'; "?,''' yr'^""" »° i" the second » li , ,, .,iV ,1"*^^"'' ''''' tlie ofhccrs ami men ciilli',1 out ■ iirt i','"i "'" '"""i-'ipality the re„s .l,|e eo n,i""r" '»""'■■'">• """leys whic i-unii'm^vr ',,' , •;i:?'V"::iJ^-':,!i"'iii.r,,';ses,,ch s.r on shaliZ'liid^lieiLr'ir'^'''''^ '''"''« ""'^^^ beihereVl'ler •' ^'"" ^l '"'"I'l'i-'iit as soon as may ''" : Utv'L ,, i,^, '■"''■'.''' ,'" "'L' lorlieth ye.-u- of '■- .iJLstj a ic^'ii, n„(| iniitiiled, ,(„ ,./,./ i'„ „,,,,,, :';,K=;".r;c,t,r:r;,,;;;;;;.i;;;-,;5" 'iijesiy 4^ Vic. cap. 3u, sec. 2. 514 141. And hvhK also, that the Imperial Statnte Ihe Army Kniistment Act, If^d?," which makes the respo„M|,ilii_v of a soldier to last 'iiild are^'nlar and lormal ilischar-e has heei, p-anledlhem.has n,, ap|,licali,.ri lo the ('ana. 'Ji.iii.Mihlia, andallectsoniy the rc-nlar army. M2. And Ihoiijrh the rifjht to an a'Mion of diiiiiayesm such case is pnielv personal, and liehintrs only to the person who has snller,.,!, it isotherwi.-eif Ihe action has heen insntiit, ill.v mil lielorehis'leath.as h,, heir- in sncli oase liiive the ri;;ht to continue it and Miccced to the claim, lb. MINLSTKll OF KDICATIOX-Sre COALMUN SiJliuULS. MrXLSTKKS OF ];KLlGIOX->S(?e CLKJJGV. MIXOIJS. I. May 111.: Voi.i ntary OiAiiDiAX oi.' I^ro- I'KiiTV ,Ski/i,i., .s7-r t |.i,u.lo,| h',- minor, iv |,e hu,«.v. «■'/.,, 2 L. N. 51), S. C. H. IS7 tlie assistance of acinator to ilelend «i>imj o, c. It. I8rt0. III. Ll.UllMTY OF MlNoK. 117. A cai.iii-* issued against the defendant, a niiiiMr, t..r tin- price of a lioi-se sold to iiin, liv the plaiiilitf, and wiiich he was char^red ,vi,l, secreting. He petitioned to ipiasl, on llic gronnd tlijU he was a nimor— y/, ,u,y,' '^''i"" ''*"'''"''' TKAN8KER Im.MOVKAIII,k.s WITIfolT AlTHoRIZATION. 149. Kvery transfer of immoveables ma,|,. |,,. (I minor without judicial aiith,,, aiHMi obiame, accorduigto the usual (i.rn,almes, is radically 'Mil, and n,a^- beset aside.,,, ll,e demarM olaiiv IV. J.,OANs TO iMlNOllS. 148. Reap(,ndent sued app.llaiit for Jill 7'' Ihe action was based on a mturial obligalim, given lor a loan of monev wlii, ,i was to f,e all lepaid, according to the i uns of tlie loan, in IK ninths, fnterest on the loan ut the rate often percent., was payable semi-annually. I he lirst ]iayment it was understood, was tJ be made in ti.' month ol November tbllcnvinir the e.xecntion o. the obligation. It was al.so expresslv slipii- lateii ibat in case the interest was not paid as it became due that the entire debt si,oul,l become exigible. It appeared in the case that the de- leiu ants who borrowed tn ■ ,noi,ev weie minors at the ti,,,e, and the foney was borrowed liy the advice ol a family council assisted bv tlieir t'inor in order to pay otf' certain ibl /due bv the estate a>.d succession of then , .other whici, liey had epted. I'o secure ,e repavme; I ot the i,ioi.'y borrowed thev mortaged "a pi-o- perty belonging to the succession. The aiilliori- zatioii obtained from the court in the aih ;ce of a family con-,! ,.rm,tte,l them to make a loan lor tlie pur| ,e n. question, to b( repaid in 18 inontlis, and al .\s good a rate as possible. The plea to the action was that the loan should have been made at a le.ss rate than ten pe- ,t., and tliat the stipulation tliat all the del. . Iioiild be one in case the interest wm- ot nai to terms was null. After before the court two vear= had long belbre expire¥ OF. 156. Delenda, pleaded to an action on a pro- missory note for $100 : that at the time he signed It he was a minor, and incapable f con- (,...,, till,, T, ' "'".' ■■'^'•i"'""-' I uun- tiaoting. Ihere was a special answer I at the CrrlTlf ■''"'"^•""'^' J,M February, 1876, al- though It oe:ir.,- aate II, February, 187.", Tliere was uo proof of this, and the only attempt tc )mTY. SIG 617 MONKF. , limt llif action tniist !,» I'wjudk, 'J R. L. 25i, 'RAN'SPIdK ImMoVKAIII.Ks ifiiiiiovealilps ina(|i> \,y uiulidi iitiitri oliiaincil, Ibrtiiahiics, is nidically i''>n tlie (Iciiinii.l iiiiinir U>lii;„n tfe Jiiirthc L . l«7(i. Minors. ?n by a minor in not rely mihy'nt to l.c un- UlUii, l>uclii'siii S77. ielheauii, Diichesneuu, rv. i) for the price oC a lot ft minor, and liail no thai a Hiinor, n'w \( iiorily, had a ri;;i|t lo irt at any Htajje oi ijje waH incapahic ul' dc- •- ofJnsticc. He had lor t lie purpose oChis s ti'oni Merlin were ■evorsed, ivifli costs •d& Blown, --. C. It. I minor, even w :onld not institut. ,,ii t the asHistance of a '/, 10 U. 1,. 6, S. C. oinor are not radi- be annulled in ciL^^es hesiiemi, 22 L. C. .1, price of a lot ofland -Held, that a minor 311 lor the inu-poscoi' lious.siiiH, 2 L. N. : Minors. : iiiimoveables pre- •t minors even pre- er married or not. J. ;^;il, & 10 R. L. an action on a pro- t at the time lie 1 incapable f con- al answer I at the fbruary, 1870, al- lury, 187;i There e only uuempt tu prove the minority was the pro,lMction of an ex- on the nth July, 1H5(;, of a child naid to have been horn on the 2.lid A.,ril. IM.VI, and mm,' plewled to Ih,. name of Ge.ir-e 0. Nauy, un.l t Zent"". ':•"'"'"? "'""-"^ "'■ i-'^"t' V MlSAl'I'iJOJ'lMATlON. I. lNUin'.MKNT H)n, we CRIMINAL LAW. MiSUEMEANOIt. LAW^Nkw'thu.:.' ''""^■^ "'' ■''" C'^'MINAL MISm<8('I!irTlON_.S.e ?l;OCEI)- U1!E, DlCbCliU'TlON OF I'AUTIKS. MOTION. JIONTUKAL. 618 [• AyAIHIKNTSToOllAllTKIl OF. 11. ( oni'oKATloN OK Kxriri.Ki) to DiouAvn » KI-KllKNTK TO Co.M.MIS,s|ONKH.S IN Cas s ...R Da.ma.;k to I'iuvatk Puoi-kktv. '"" )v:Rv"L:;:s'or*'"'^"''^''«''°«^^'°''or- L A.MKNn.MENTS TO ClIARTKR OK. Ciu oi'm""! ^•r"''"'''"'" "• 'he elmrler of th* 'iii.-< I iin nice, 'II V le, eaii '7'J9.i')\/' iu"«.'J:;:;:;;";;"<;:Lt.,SSf';™°-*»' s„;;;~r;.r;;:;:„r ^"■"■•■■■.■''"i"' L Of.- Prui-kiitv, Ground for ViCATiKr Si.ERiFF'.s .SA..K.S, .v,r SALE, JlimcIai. MISNO.AI FIJ_,<^„, PROCEDURE I>fc:sci;iI'TR)X t)].' J'.MiTIES. r. WllKN fi,;o(NI) o,- hlxcu-TION TO Tiu- Form, see I'llOCEUlUK, K... u'tjo.ns. MISREPRESENTATION'. X ReI'OIITS and AcCdl XT.S 01 .see UUIM'ORATIU.VS. If. What i.s, 6ee INSURANCE. I. InRei'oijts and Arc(,ixT.s of Corpmp. Tiuxs, ,ee CUIM'ORATIU.VS. ^' MIS-IRIAL— ,Sfee CRIMINAL LAW. MITOYEN WALL— *S'ee SERVI. TUUES. MOBILIZATION. 1. Effect of Clausk of iNMAHHUfc- r^.. THACT, ,v.e MARHIAfM.; CONTR>tTS hT MONEY-^'ee CURRENCY li-h the amount of the dam.ve bv /neiuis of conim,s,s,nnei«, it in to,- ihenrto i^./, the ft|.po,nt,nent o( hucI. commissioners V, ,- •/ ,' jn. Borrowing Powers op Corporation .iw v/(W, that .section 04 of 14 A- 15 Vie can n^, resiricting the borrowing powers of f^ Corporation of Montreal to XlSo.'ooO, doe , i t .ppiy lo 8ubs,;ript,unH for rai.Uvav puruoses IV. Bye-Laws of. L'9 And in the same case— /AA/ that a -Y'-iau of the Corjioration of M„,tre for S:it^£;;^i^:i'srt-i';££ M-ie, :'code:n;^'";u;'^r:T"i'"'" ^;e.a;ldtown^i^:rp;:id^::pL;;!lp•L[? MORTGAGE— 6ee HYPOTHEC. SHil^lMXG."'"*" ^''''^'" *■'' ^^li^iiCHANT ]\[OTI()N-.See PROCEDURE. II ^F,HrS.^^^t-''''"r"''' ■'^'^ PROCEDURE. CIAI 1^^'"^;«K, ,SW SALE, JlDI- ^IL^ Service of, see PROCEDURE. electfuis muniii|«u.x ,'rm Hem probation du repiemeut! 49T m"c ^''^""' "•' '* ^'^^''P- ij P 1 610 MUNICIPAL COUI'ORATION.S. MOVKAllLKS. I. I,1K\ OX, II. lU>ii.i,viinK in- SAf.K OK, *.y SAI,M I. \avs on, ICO. M, wahloM wh,.,, imnlm'^o,! „m,| tuken po^HP.,.,,,,, ot ,„ >r,„„| lulfh an. IT..,, (n,,,. h' •JobK wl.H ,,.,• |,nv,l,.^r,.,| „,. „M,,rivil..^re,l, of ■ r;,v//,„/„, -, i^. J., u. 72, s, (J. IfHTl). •"""*' IV. What auk. liil- .A 111;' iiiMimnoo onllev Ih a niovpnl.l,. ,,'::'"!'""",'" '■• '^''' •'"•'' I ',x,„ <„„:.• Co., .1 L n' 410, Si 21 L. C. .). 2'Xi, S. v.. I«,so MUXicrPAL COia'OiiATIOXS. I. Action to Anni'l Mvi:-(..uvs of. II. A|'1'|:a1. FH0,M JriKiMK.ST.S ("o.\CKUNI\(i Jll. .\SSI>S.MK\TS. IV. ASSKSSMKNT Koi.l,. y. DoND.S AM) UkiikxTIUKS OP Vil. 'l)vi;-l.Aivs. STi/i':i";r,s""''' ""■' ^^''''''^'■'' "*' •'^•''""^ts, ,,,., SciH)!»| s"'^' '"' ^''^"'''*' *"'' ""^ COMMON X. (-'oNFIIIMATKiX OK Pi. AX ,,K. XI. ('m\ti:station or Ki.i:( tiox.s. All. Ol.-.MI.S.SAI, OK SlJHVAXIS OK. XIII. Ki,i:cTiox OK Coixcii.i.oiis ^XIV. Ki.KcTOKAi, i.ivr OK, ..(.(. ELECTION XV. Ivxi'iioi'itiATiox OK Land hy. Amii>l,iiiiieii1 iif Ci>iiniilsxi,„,,'rs. ' TIOX ''"■"""■^' •V'-'iN-^T. .w INJUNC- XVII. I.IAIiil.nY OK. Fill .IrriJi'ii/x. For Av/.i ((/' 0//i,ri:f. J''or Fenci'.s, For Fooljinl/i.i. For ,S'-rriiji-n iifMnnin, ,sei> MILITIA. J'or Trixj)!! .1.1. Til liiilichiiOiil. XVIII. LlKX OK KOIt Taxk.s. XIX. Local Coiu-oiiatioxs .may iik Snn hy Cor XT V (.OUI'OUATloXS. X.\. .\lAV,■■ .'{'"J""'"' I'^'itxiKsori/ Kiili's. XX v'. PoWKliS OK U'kKICIU.s. To Sir/, I Xo/i'.i. X;XVI. Pi!oii.;,^-Vi:miAix. 'N-^y."- ^.''-^Ml'K'.VMOX OK Ar,Il!;!i.Mi;X. XX \ ill. Rk.muxhiiatio.v ofCity Attoiinkt MUNICIPAL CORPOKATIONH .B20 vvl'^' "*■**"' I TK'NH OF. j^\XI,J{,,;.n.OKTor,.AU0KlXTKKK.r.., .\.\.\l!, Uiciiir OK TO Pass llvi i,»ws l>„ mHmM,^T,..SAi,K OK i.,K.„,i:i.'v,:L;, ;.;;;; .\.\.\IV. KlOMT OK TO AlTIIOIUZK .StRITT ItUI WWS TO JmsK .StIUKT I I.I- , A ,. "!';< siia.:i.:iuA,iA\.vv •'•'■•■"" '^^' '•'■ X.N.W. ItoAiM. X.X.W'l. Stiii-.kts. I. AcTio.N- TO Axxri, Hvi.:-Law,s ok. . I'i2. Aclioi. I,, nnniil ns ill,.^! „ hvi-huv ■■>' o the ( u,U. of Pr,Mv,lun.,» n,a>,nu..|, u l''v oiuuK..,! ,,, ..tl.rt that (I... Corpora., ;■'|'l'^NU,a,l.^x,.,..M.,|,„nvcr-,u.tc.oU|.rr...l ;,,' .;W.-nv.ll,Ml,Jno,,|pprivc,l,,.,,ian;,,,', , M.Jiv,l,y.. lK,orell,c.tr,l,,M,ali,!,lH.,.o av ■t^. I .-I (^orporaliuMH hy who.... a.:|s |,i. ,,-1,1 oi|.o|,..r,y loa.y l,e injunoM.sly ailcru.,!, „,• • "Inn, )a.,,,ay 1,0 ,,, a,,ywaya..rK.v,.,l ,, I • '■a,,,.., a„, lo.he mm„i. extent, 7^ he cm; ,| , a^.un.- ,,,,,v.,|,ud.nn,ler.,,n,htrcire,,,ns,a,,'.:.,' ■S C i^/^'"'^"''"'"'" <;/'Q>"!>"; 1 tj. L. K. 27,-,, II. Al'KKAl, Kao.M .IriHiMKXTS CoXCKllX ,x,i l'i:i. There is no n-ht of apju-ai ih„„ a j,,,!,,. rMe„l n.„,|e,.e,J hy the ,S,.|,e,'',r Co„r, o,,' ,v <;tv'liiiK« oonoerninj; in.lnaiipal :,ihi,i',s, „„| j' ni..' MiHlerihe ,.,-ov,..K,,,s'o,,:|,,,,,te,'l P>.J. Appeal hy plainuir and al,o„t o„e l,nn- clieJ others Iron, a deusion of a l,o,i,,| of ,h.|^- trmt's 01 the oo.inlies of Chaieaii ni • , I Hnntinplon /iM, 21st ^lay'i^^^^rZn'ul ;,'aiinj;ay;/v»-,;,,-,-,T6,'/p,.epai-e,"i hv |J. V.,>„eci,il M.l,ern, e„, e„t appu,n.e,l by' the 'c ^ I Lo„e,l o Chateauj;„ay, aiul o,',ienn,' oer t, u v.son the.so,..h hranch ol the U,ve,.7)n,anle MioUuiing a cultnig of the luek in the Ued u * li, M,o followinif caies: vi".;.)^!';;!',';':;!' ,,,'7 C"'-p"'-'"i"", i.uni.o iM„iy ,»■ i,„ard _^Cnnceri,i„g ,y«,y ,r<,rmHYoa9 in the ,,rc.coli„j{ note. ^U'OlUTUm ,fi20 I 621 MUNICIPAL OOKPORATIONS. Mhsrs C()X(i:i!Mv,; '^i-tst it F.,iir,i,'T, 3 n the im-eetliii^r note. MU.VIOIPAI, fOIll'O; TrOXS. 522 Ar'i'''r,J!;,', ,?!'';■"'""" ";';."?'" •'■" "i" ;^;..i;;v:j!:;;;!z!;;!-.:c!;i;.;:;;i;;i:;:; in. AsSKMHMKXTH. riKiiis-//,/,/, ,||.,t ,,„. |,sN,.^,s,,r-( o|- \(m,i,.,„.| r';:.' ; r;;,:",;;";;- """ • '-'■"'« proof .,uIk.s..,vu;.. is not sMlIicient: A ' ...N.M.lK.r,sa..,,Hi,.ateur,,,,l,l.c.Uio,, „( iiMilfi- tlieir oalh.M „f ulli.'i- «ii(H,.i,.„. „ pr,.fs.r.rl>al of uliich tl. ■ : '. '," " «ll|o„u'„,M„.,„^,v.,lat(l„.t.•mltlml,, ' ' cution.s Hvrcliilv 1,111,1,.. II, lili;. Am ..|,p,.||,u,t iu„l,.r Art. lOdl „! Uif .\ .nioipa (:.„|,.,t as umhmMcmI |,v .'ll) Vio- can SMjr'n ul I „. „,,,,,al. air,„u \. iLrni; n iltSI.Jeau Cluy.„slo,nc,b(i. LAi. DT.c'c S III 1^ iii,-i,,«„, III tl,,. CiHiiity ,,( CliiKciii,,,,,,,, wm. U-S..MS,, ,„r ,1... i.i.pn.v.M.u!,, r ' Biiil uaM iiiii.li. rohinial.lo on th,. I- « ' '7 ''■"--« ■//■/'/ ;cti ,;,.";;';;';;;;: ol f.v,:cj,ti„ns to th,. iWrin l,v fl„. • "■'H'lc appml lnHu.:l. .a-,., ,| not' |„. „,,,.v j ,' , mrlics i,l,„ |„.||ii,„,e,| tor tli<. iv,,.|/ {."t.l,at,n,,|./rA,r |,)70 t-t, C,^;,:^^^^^^^^^^ ftMmniMi.l..,|i,v;i:) V,v. .Ml, y' '. V' I '''. •iHiul.l t«. nan I nto „: c,r ,i, '. ■ T'" tlic/irstilayofil,.. t ", 1,^ '',,'. '''','■' '''' gun,,, u'\.. C, J. 2(4 (J. C i^? ^ '''"""'"■ AS.SK.S.S.MK.VT Hol.i,. ll.ll- '1 (r.7j/„V„„,,,,,/,l,„,,. Q r^ rir.ru,,. lit. ,,,. ... ) S"!;™S' V'l;;:;.If '.Iii™^ '"lii^t.., ,l,.|Mi lalm r. m.on . • , ?i'':;'" '"" '" coilH nu ,1,.- r,.,M,.„„.,„' am" iciJaiUr" '"■^l"'-^'"""- da ce J, ""^"'I'"'"'"'«''ProuUro commissaiiOT. luu" "as not inai I court— iTeW, 70. In an action for .school ta.xco-//,/,/ t|,„t ','"-■ ""llil.v or a nuin,r,,|,al assess,'., t-^ ''''-'-otinvolvMhennllit/oftliVii '',.,;; ;''-'' i". I- -nrsco,\!;;.Zitn .';:;;;; i: iiuit rolls |„ the .sfcretary-tn.a.suri.r ihar ""t . urm^r ono n.onth ll„.,-ealt..r n . 'J ,t ; J ;;''■'■ ''-l-^'Hono.' any M.tor,.'t.,i'," ro I I ",T ' •'"">■ i'''''^"' '>!• oini>si,„i in ,|,e '^ ^ >hull ^'ivr „o„c. olthnr coMiplauits. T e '^11 was not ,|,.,.os,„.,l i,| ,1,, ,„ , ,„/';. •'"IP. Imt n. Ai.^rust anil Sciitni, I, ,■_//,./ J '''■'' '''^'f'"ly<.|K.ctot-.i,ela,luiit;,.iu .sa.Mcy.,h,,,,ht.,i,,,.s,H.cilie,iwon!.ll,.,,l,rv ,t liei'.'ll Iron, I.eing conclnsivf against ,.rso ' lll't'llllllg thciM.si.lvi.S injiiroil l,v' l( ■ml, ;voui,llnKethor„htto^..tupS.:s, !,., f; '"■• 'iK-ir proportion of th'. Sss.ss„„.nt ' ToiMiil.s ,l„.y tuight have nr...,l np„„ u\'^^ ii'got nconii.la.Mt under .sai,| .soc. (IC ; ,!„. .. . .section hem- merely directory, the lUiliire" to Ill .111 tnin, cnn.in-into force as a ivhole, or to gender , ,„, ahMihue nulhly. CorporaNo', ^f I'-. Action was brought by appellant to r^. «over from the cty ot^Mon freal a,^ '„,u„^?t "lloged to have been collected (Von, | , ," ,r a-.-e.ssn,onts not legally due. thoa.-sess,, ^ ', [ "j'ifr wiiich the pimnent was exact" r hen f:'gcd to he a nnflity. It appeared that c ,n- "M-s,oner.s had been up,.,inteil forthe • den went roll hx:„g the anionuLsto be levied on the !).'o{.netor,s henelited. Their report, owever m h ild the 18 reversing tlie judgment of the 523 MUNICIPAL CORPOEATIONS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. 52^ Cdiii't lielow',* that coiiiiiiiHsioiifrfi alter ciiiirt was nil iilis plaiiitill wa'^ ciititlcil ('ill/ I'l Miiiili;-iil. 'i I,. N. ;M().\- A- Id H. 1„1(h;, Q. \i. 1,S7!);.V n a mil pi-oilufcil liy the the ilehiy lixeil bv tlie hue nu'liitv, amf the to reeovci'. Jhii/tis v iL. C.J. HOI, l.iiiH V. Vihj ii'l Ato.ihral, 3 J.. x\. 2x->, k 2A L. C. J. 222, Q. Jj. 173. And in hisaelioti to recover, il'llie assess- liient roll he a.iniilted by tiie plea, it is not lieite.-sary lor the jihiintill' to produce it. Ih. IV'I. lint /(.A/, also, that he is onlv entitled to iiitere t IVoin the date of the institiitioii of the ucticjii, and not Iroiii tiie date of the paviiienl of tlie iiKHiey if the del'eiidants were in frciod lai'li. II). 175. And in another ca.' , in which (he plain- till paid tlie aniuiint claimed after ih;- institution oflhe aclion in order to avoid an execuiion-- y/'Vr/, that this was not a wauer ui hisri'dit. BU.-<(>n V. Cilii .;/' Mod f real, 2 L. N. lUl, ^ 2:! L. C. J. 300, g. B. ISV'J. 17(1. On appeal to (|,e Queen's Bench— //,/,/, that an assessment mil made hy three vahiiUors, of whom only two weie lef,'allv"appointed, is mill and void. A'n/f,: it Ct"J'<>wii«,':ii) of ^■/o/,r, 3 L. N. C'J, iV 24 L. C. J. 213, O IS IHXO. 177. ^Vliere a municipality inaile an assess- ment roll iji 1S72, . mother in I.'<7.i, and afjain another in 187(i, hy wiiicli the estimated value of property was very lar>;ely increased— y/c/i/, that as the law provided only 'liir trienni;il assess- ment rolls, that the one made in l^^TtJ must he consiilered illeiral, and a sale of lands f,.rschool taxes imposed in pursuance of it was prohibited. t Monjan k Cvli; 3 L. N. 274, Q. B. ISsO. V. BOXDS AND DtDEXTlRES OK. 17s. Action airainst tlie county of Coiiip- toii. the town of Sherhrooke and llie townships of A.scot, Orford and Compton liir $3!J,IMKI, in- terest on l!)l) debentures of .«l,IHm each, being seven semi-annual payments. Plaiiitiir>declared primai'ily on thedehentiires, and then slated that a hye-law No. ,37 was passed (pvovisionallv) l>v the County Council on the I4lli .Septeniber, 1<"7(), to authorize the county to take stock in the St. Franci.s and ilegantic HaiKvav Com- pany. Tlie by-law was ap|)roved bv \.ite of the local or township miii.icipalities in the couniy on the Isth and I'Jt', of October fol- lowing, and^ was fhially pas-ed by the County Council on tiie2Stli,and approved' by the l-ieiit.- Goveriior in Council on the 2(itli December, in said year. They further alleged that the bve- law was prononnced valid by a judgment of the .Superior Court on the lOth'of'said December, upon proceedings taken by the A'toriuv Gener- al jin, rei/inii I'gain'-t the couii.v to 'have it declared null and void. Bv an Act, 34 Vic. • Viile 1 L. N., fi2. t (TrI (iK'iuiiiiKlr ji'ir ,10) T'lV. c(rp. 21, sr'r. 19.) A' X inni:* ill' ,Iiiin ct (le,Juillet (|iil siiivent l.i mise on fence (lece code cl cl:ins la suite tons \i'h trels aiis aux Iiietnes iniiiK le» estiiiiateurn do tmili' iiiiinioi)iaiiti- locale dniveiit (lie-^uer par eiix nienics hi jrar t'liie aiiire uer- Koniio ciniiloye.'S par eiix line rule d'evaliialluii iIiiih loqiiel a>ii:t esiDiu'vi. avoi", f^.in .-t ,.sr„.ti ,,,,],. („uti.s i,.,s jiRriioularit^s reyuisus par Itu dispositioiiu dece litre, ilti iVl. c cap. 30, the town of Slierbiooke and the town ships of Ascot, Ortbrd and Compton were de tached trom the coiiniy of Compton alter the passing oftlie bye.law,aiid thev we-e con-e ipiently made defendants in the caii.se with the county as being liable lor their pro|K,rtion ot the amount claimed. The five ilelendants appeared and the countv confessed jmb'iiK .t the town of Sherhrooke allowed tli'e ca-e to proceed i:rj,wti; and the other three defendants ' contested and Hied pleas of peremptorv e.xcen- iion III law. The form of the dehentiires was that the miinicipalitv had rece.ved so iniicii money " as a loan,'- and the delendaiitscontest- ingdenied tins, and declareil tliev were hmorant as to whether the coiintv i-sue,i or aulhorizd the issuing of thedebentnres, but coiitendeil that 111 any case the procee.lings were iil/fd rires and the debentures coiiM'ipientlv nwW—llctd that tlie liye-Iaw was leL'al and valid, and that debentures so issued under aiithoritv of cap 25 ol the Con. Stat. Low. Can. are negotiable .securities, and pa-s IWnn han.l to hand bv mere delivery, and the holder mav d<( lare npn'n them as promissory notes under the .Municipal Code Aoy/nii Joiciis/iipn Binik v. MuiiidpuLHii ,,/ t(;m^;/(,«, 7R. L. 447, S. C. 1871. VII. Bye-Laws. int. The nullity of a mniiicljial bve-lawim- posing a tax in aid of a railuav, and whi.di live- law has on the face of it been" re.riilarlv pa-sej aiidapjiroved by theLieiit.-Goveriior, cannot be set lip in bar of an action for the recover', of an assessment made in virtue of the bve-Iaw La Corporation of the I'arixh of'SI. Oiiniaiiniev \"'TT'!i"'L"'( ""^ '^'"""'^ of Drummowl, 7 H, fj. 721, (I. B. 18r (). 180. The provisior,s of the Municipal Code, Art. 4.»7, do not apply to cities uiid towns incor- porated by s|)ecial Act.* Mohoi, k Tlu- Oil,, <;/ Montreal, 23 L. C. J. IGl), Q. B. I87(i. 181. Theajijwllant aie, .some other butchers of St. Jean Baptiste villaire hiid ..abiisliH public market places outside the muIkc •m'rket penalty m case of violation of a line no't exceed- ing twenty dollars and imprisonment lor a term not exceeding thirty davs.— //,././, that the Vrt of the C. de on which the l.vc-hiw was based heiia' 111 part ultra c/r-.v, the bve-Iaw c.nld he ameii.kM .so as to re.«t only on that pari oftlie Art, of th,. Code which was consiiliiti,„i;t|. r»/7„/7/,. tc !:\>;P''r<>fJoiioft/ie Village of St. Jean liaplMc, 7 li. L. (iK), C. C. 187(i. 182 Avtioa to Jiecover Moiiei/ I'aiif iimkr y»e.f/(//.— Action was bidnghtlo rec(,ver iiionev exacted under an illegal bve-Iaw. The pick wa,s that the bve-Iaw should'hav,. been first set aside, and could not be attacked incidentally i(.,i "f"''^.!'"' ♦""able real es^late ot tlio municipality it i.-il)lef„r the payment .,1 »uc(, I,,,... ,,.r ,i,.!„,„i,'„.„. J^n InuiH.'ipal electers wlio are tlie |inipriet„rs o' such real estate are alonoentltled to vote in approval or dlsapprov»l of BUcU bye-law. Muii. Code, Art. 4a7 u'-ttpprut'" IPORATIONS. 524 M'bi'0(il

    ;iiiL.,t, ' alhiwwl the case to other three (lelendauts ' ' (>r |iereni|)lory e.xcep- ol the delieiitiire.s wus .ad reee.ved s(j much the deleiidantscuiitest- •ed they were ijinurant • i'^siieil iir aiiiii(iriz(.(| res, hutciiiiteiided tluu iiij;-i were iil/ni rires, -ei]iieritly null— //,./,/ i\ ami valid, and thai der aiitliDrity of cap, V. Can. are nejiotiahle hand to hand by mere miy d<( hire iipd'u theiii 'r the iMunieipal Cuilc. C, 1871. '' •' live- I whi iiwim- live- niinicijial libvay, aiii been rejiularly passed .-Governor, caniiut be 111 for the recover', of •iitne of the bve-Iaw, ■ishot'SI. GiiiUaumew ij oj' Dntinmonii, 7 K. ' the Aliinicipal CoJe, cities and towns incor- Mohiiii tt 7%; Citi, 31», Q. IJ. 1>S7(;. some other hiitehers la.u'e had < . :abiishe.,l ide the iuihi.c 'iii'.rkct to a bvelaw of the 1X7I. This in-e-lavv Dsnre lor sale of fresh inarl(et, subjert Id ,i n of a fine not e.xceeil- [irisonnient liir a term -llihl, thai the Art. i-e-law was based being lawccnld be ameiidcil iiirl ol'the An. of tlic itioii.-il. ('(irli,in,' it ■ I'fSt. Ji'iiii llfiplisic, Moiifi/ PaiiJ iiuihr ,'lil to recover nioii.'v bye-law. The ple'u Id havi' been first ,ict il lacked incidentally le of the municipality ii lesn or deDeiihiniR, tlip priiprintors <>' such rt'sl II approval or itli-approv*! It. 4S*7. r.25 MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. 526 uii.ler Art. TO.')' of the Municipal Code-//,/,/ tinti even if this article applied to the Minni' cipahty appellant, ,t could not be interpre.ed to av Ihil a bye-law m direct oppn.sitioi, to the iivvn,n,st beset aside wilhm ihree nionlhs or thuly days as provided by the statute. /.„ Corporahon uc la Vill,- ,/,.- ,sv (;,n„ain ,k /,,/«o«,s-A7 .t Ruiytut, 1 L. X. 115, Q. ){. xx-H 1-^.t. Ihe apjiellants took a bulcher's slall i'n .St. James .narket, in the City of. Montreal, there l^iiiS llien HI lorcea l,ye-law which prohibits the .sale o( meat outside of the market' without a -pecial licen.se to this end, and that no such ^10 ). ml.s ol any market. One Corbeil paid .M(IO Wo years running' tor a license, and :';;".'tlly di.l open a .stall within the lin it o •HIO yards. He never had a Ih^ense. ami the Lorpoiation lendered back Ihe !?;il)0- //,./,/ that III!', appellants had no reme.lv in daimce- piiisl Ihe Corporation for a v'i, da I ion of The sTq? "li fs7.j ''-'" '^ ^'''''' "f'^l""tn"il, 2 L. X. bSl. Where the Corporation of M.mlreal had oiithorily to make bye-laws to prohil.it the sale "I meat ouls.de the publi,' markets, and al-o bv j'"-;iln'i;eMHclinent lopermit it-//,7,/, that ihev had .sulhcient anlhorily to ap,,oint limits w.iiun « IK I It should he sold. L,-rL,„.^. The Vi,,/. ' JA.///m(/, 2L. N, ;iu(i, & :;;{ L.c.,j os.f s / ISO. And /ic!,(, also, tiial the bve-laws of a city hnn-presun,aldy made in lli.: interests „f tl.epnhhc, the courts wonhl not, wdhont jrood cause, interpose tc set them aside. lb ^■I|. And where it w^as urjre.l lliat the bye- l.i» in. question had been subimtlcd to the ^ieiiteiiaiit-(>overii(,r, within the delay pre- RTihe, -//W,/, tliat the l,ye.law must be co,'- eidered valid until disapproved of. 10. Ciip fil, did not authorize the City of Montreal to, iismiss Its servants without notice.* ])„,,- 1 "ho '^ '^ Montreal, 3 L, N. 204, Q. U. XJir. Ei.KCTioN- OF Couxcii.i.onw, I'JO. On the contestation of a municipal election-//,/,/, that the assistant secretary- X. CONFIU.MATION OF J'l.AN. 1S7. A plan Of a municipalily may be cnn- finned notwithstanaing the existence of di.s- IHited rights between it and the neigbborin- imiiiicipality. Vorpomlio,, of I',//,,,/,,/' 17/^- dun ct ^orpomtim of VilUujt „f CoU St. Pa,,/, i L. ^. d-iO, is. C. 1«71). XI. CONTESTATIO.. OF El.KTTIOXS. J1LV''' "^'''f '"'' '"»"i''i|'i'l ofiice must be con e.sted accordin- to the provisions oi; and m Ihe manner pre,soribvifti ^, '7t?ve"rL^"i":'' '^ '■""^"""■' -"'• '■««lo.n 'nt ," hu', .!»'^ treasurer has the same right to preside at the Hcctioi, meeting as the secretary him.self. .)/o/r/«- V. Ji„..ro„;, 7 R. L. MO, Mag. Ct. IH . IJI. Aim the lact that tlio,se v.dio have i:ommated Ihe candidates are not voters is not a can.se ol nullity m the election if no ohjeu- !■ iV',' ,"'n ■ ■■'f ■", """"■""'i'-^'> »'• tlH> opening yl^ the i,oll, and il the votin- has been regular^ 192. And the omissj.m of the v»„///y of the olcct,.rs m the poll t,nok i.s not a cau.se of Miillity in the election if no iniusiice results rom It, as it does not materially ellect the elec- tion. Il), ly;5. The absence of the secretary. treasurer Iroin th,. iniinici|ial bureau during the week pivcedmg the election, ami the impo.ssilolilv on that account ofthe voters i„ pav iheir ta.xes ai" obtain the right of voting, is not a cause of iiullilv in Ihe election, if the absence was un- avoidableand without fraud, and wheiv, in fact one elector only pre.seiilcl him.-elf i„ pay iii.s ta.xe- and was deprived of the right to vote in conscpience. Jt>. " 11)4. Respondent was elected council 'or at llie municipal elections of the parish of Oron.lines hy the casting vole of the president. Among lho,' tins duty upon us are in the 1st siih-seolion ol section four of the Act, and they say that the Corporation shall give notice in the manner there set forth, that it will, through its counsel, ]ireseiil, on a certain day and hour mentioned, to the Superior Court sitting in review in the District of Montreal, a jietitiou calling on tlie said court to clioaKc mid iio/niiiiilr thiee com- petent and d;siiileresled persons for the purpose ol aen, thcreloie, ohjectioiis are niade to our e.xeicising (his power so plainlv ini|iosed, tho-e otjections ou;;ht, of coiir.-e, to address tli.'iu.Md v.'s, not, as thev for the most pan would .seem to do here, to the danger of tlie misuse of the, r power hv the commissToners aller they shall have heen apjiointed, hut looiir power Ol ap.Minling at all. The controliin.r power which this court possesses over Coriiorii- tioiis, and whicii was aflv and justlv insisted upon hv the learned counsel, does not extend toemilde usto defeat a positive enaclment of the Legislature, liowever ddliciilt or unreason- ahle lis reipuremeiits. ( uder the law this court has not now to considei what will he tlie duties of the commissioners, nor how thev may uiseharge Ihein ; hut oiilv to appoint commis- sioners who will he amemihle to the law for the diieperiormance of their duties. As to the point ol interest, it certainly appeared to me at lirst to he a dilliciilty in the wav of aiijioinling coiu- mi.ss, oners at all. 'J he counsel for the ('or- poralion put it on the ground that the interest was an indirect one. I tiiink, after reflection, that the pouil of iMerrsf ,.,-„-, he disposed of on certainly used the word "disinterested," hut it has also said the choice of the court is to ho made from those wlioare assessed as proprieu.rs of real estate of the value of at least $10,0(10. It has therefore declared the interest of anv citizen, whatever it may he, is not a disc|iiniiiv. iiig iiilerest, since those who have this jilO.OlM) (|ualilication are all made eli-ihle. We think, Iherelore, that it has lieen siicces-fuliv cc.ii- teiided, on hehalf of the citv, that what llie - court is directed to do under this law i.s "to choose and nominate three comjietent and dis- interested persons out of those assesse.l at ••SlOjOdO to act as as>essors or commissi,, ners for the purpose of assessing the cost of the Imi- provements ,11 whole, orin part, as the case may he, on the properties heiielited. anil t,j tix a day on whicli they shall hejiiii their opera- tions ;" and this we proceed to do in these several cases. City Expropriation Casta in re., a. C. ii. li^80. XVn. Li.Anii.iTY Ol.'. llin. F est lait en double, chmuie tiiici' ^ " I loui. J lie swtuti liaH j doitavuirauiuohiiciuqpieUsdohirgour. 835M. C. RPORATIONS. 528 •' disinterested," Imt it ;e of tiio iMiirt is t(j be ' asseHsed as pniprictcrrs I lie of at least $1U,0(I0. i'd the interest of :ii,y ' lie, is not a (lis(|Maiiiv. wlio Imve tlii.s 4^fullv cnn- le city, iliat wiml the - under tliis law is " to ree C(im|ieteiit and ,li-- of llii'se asse.sscil at iHors or eominissiiincrs inu' the oust of tiie ini- 'r in part, as the eii.-e es beiielited. and U> t'a all l)i'j;in their opera- ■oeeed to ilo in lljcse roprialion Gases in re., Action ajrainst City (jf ahie of a horse liitally III, and for dainaws to It llie Ciirporatmn lia.l inel in Craijz ft., the 1 nut li"en .siilHcienily inch that as the plaiii- le trout wheel of his the axle was liri/|(c:i, wav injured itself so i—Jli:/(l, that theCnr- ■eliaiiilKtiiH V. Ciiii ui C. Wd. I is not liable for iliiiii- riiction of iiecessarv e a(ipears, or liir dari- oiiiission to make a no drain previninlv if Mimtreal, 3 ii. X. 1 a^'ainst tiie defciij. ia'ised liv the narrnw- I'r which the phiimiil' 'loii^'ed to and wa« at laiits— 7/«A/, that a ivsponsiliie for dam- he provisions of Art. .* Coriiiiriifiiin lU: SI. I it licn-<'ui, of titanbriit,jc, 2,'! L. C. J, ITU, Q. Ji. 2l)G. For F,>,>1pa1hs.-TUe Corporation of Montreal is liable lor dama-es caused bv the had Ptate ot one of the public footpaths in the 207. 1 he city of Montreal is liable for dam .yes caused by raising' the level of a .street, al- Ihundi aiithrirized by statute to do so. (Irenicr !;■',' I' ■V'^"'>'»'l, •'* Ii. N. 51, Q. U. isso. 2(l,S. The Corporation of Montreal is liable for damages caused by the ba.l state of the public footpaths in the city, and the Corpor- ulioii lias a recourse an f/arantic for such dam- ages against the proprietor of the premises opposite the tootpath. Gnill,mm,.'y. Cit, o/ M„n. frm k C'll;/ of Monlr,;it v. I.orose, ;) t. Nl 40li k 24 L. C. J. 258, S. C. 18M0. 201). For 7V''.s7«m.-I>laintifriiad been eiii- pioved as laborer by the road inspector of the * enilants, to open a new road in the munici- pality, and had been sued fbr trespass ind,,in,r so. Uelendants contested the case as their own by their own attorney but faile,|, and judgment was rendered against plaintifl for ,«!20 and costs, lie delendants then, in accordance with a rc- wliition passed at a special meeting, carried the ceseto review.where the judgment was reversed • liul, being carried to appeal, was restored with a COS Is against the pre.sent plaintitf, amouniing, the condemnation money, to $;i00, which plaintirt uow claimed, together with $400 duin- .'^es Uefen.lanls pleaded that plaintilf had not shown, as he was bound to do, that the acts 111 question were duly authorized ; that thev were m thein-elves illetral, ami that, moreover, '.'•'''■iidants fiad acted nitr,, rir,:s in tiikiio' part 1" (he original suit and defen.iiiii: it. Tliey iii-o ]i'-i:eo that the pr,,per recourse of plaintilf was ill warranty, and that not bavin- availed bim-idf 01 that he could not recover— //cW, that thede- fendants were liable In the amount actnalU ■silt ered by pla.ntilf, but not in special dama-es. '' /' u" ^ <'"n>"<-"ti'iii- of St. Gal,rid West, ■i h'. Iv. K. .lO. !i. (_'. If<7ll. 210. T,> fn,li,'l„,ent.— An indictment will lie against the I nrp,,nil,on of a rural municipalitv (or the non-repair of a hi-hwav, altlum..|, it is a front road of which eacdi proprietor is bound to repair his Ironiau'e. AV,//„« v. Corporation l-i {'i"'!!.':'"'' 'if ^i- ''■^"nrc'tr, S Q. L. R. 2Ki, H' I'. 18i I . 211. Ami in such ca-e where the Corporation after conviction causes the road to be repaiie.l, a mere Iv nominal fine will be imposell, and costs will not be awarded in favor of the orivate prosecutor. lb. ' XViri. LiKN- OF lOR T.V.XKS. 21 2. 'J"!ie plaintiff, a wife .v,.;,,,,-^,. ,lr i,ie„,, t,„,k an m.iunction against the ilelendant to stop an e.xecuti„n (i,r ta.xes due bv her husband on pro- perty occupied by him asaiiollice in a ilitl^rent part of the city lo where they resided, and "■ liere the delemlant.s sou..-ht "to lew. The el .;cts .seized were the furniture of the hou.se in which they lived, and had been purchase,! by P amtKi at a sheriffs sale of her hiisbami's statute (,!7 Vic. cap. 51, .sec. 88) was to levy, by warrant from the Itecnler's Court in l.5Mavs fitter ,lenian,| " from the goo.ls ami chattels of tfie person bonn,l to pay the same, or of any ^^goo,lsan,lchalt,|s in his possession, where- ^_ ever the same may be foumi within the citv, am no claim of property or privilciie there.ni ^^01 tluTcto shall be available to jirevent the ^^.sale thereof for the jiavnient of the assess- lueiiis taxes ,)rduties ,u„l costs out ,,f the pro,;ee,ls thereof."-//./,/, that th.. plaintiff, though living 111 fhesani,. house, had a posses- sion .se-purate from lier hii-band, an,l the cily .?.;", 'V^'/'-YT'"''- ^'''''•" V- <"'"/ of M.o,lrr„U 1879.' "'^' ^' ^'- '^'^' ^ - ^-^^ ' '"'^ "• XIX. LOCU. CoRl'Oli.VTlO.NS .MAV UK Si-Ei) i:v IjOUNTV toiifJUATIONS. 2i:i. Appeal from a Judgment rendered bv the .Superior Cnirt, Arlhabaska, rej-'cting » deiliand of the appellant for a writ „f prohibition. -J'lie Jietition allege.l in substance that in H7;! the jietitioners l,ad been sne,| by the respondents before he magistrates lor the county of Drum- nion, lor $1887.75, amount of an asst..ss„„.nt on the taxable propi^rfy of the parish of .Sf Cruillaume, made by the ounty of Dnimmond (iTspondoiit), 1,1 virtue ofabve-faw of the ,.,„,„,v subs,.nbing u sum ol !S5tM.lub to the Uriimmund and Anhabaska l{,ailway, and imposing on the diflereiit parisiies of tlie county a tax to m m ■ti 531 MUiNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. coyer the same. The action was based on tl\e f^aid live-law, wliicli wai passed under and liv anlhurily of cap. 2o ot tlic Con. Slat, of Lower Canada. The |)etitioners alle^-ed that thp ina^ristrato presidiiijr in the Majrislrale's Court ]iad no power and jurisdicticm to take coL'ni- zance ut sueh an action; that this (ihject"i not olnerved. Per Ciiriam ■ — iJy the 14ili and l,')th Vic. c. 128 of ls.-,i, the city has power to do many things, some oil condition of compensation to "parties aggrieved, iind .some without compensation; bv^sub-W tion of sec 10 of 2.'i Vic. of 1800 it was anlho- rized to make byedaws to widen streets or to (liter them or to discont.nue them. Under this law, and a bye-law under it, a street was discon- tinued in 18(;(; to the dam.age of Ilun. Jud^'e Drummond. Yet I held him entitled to iio compensation, as the law provided none for lii^ case In 1S(;8 the defendants had power to pit-.s the bye-law referred to in plaintirs declaralioii, and 111 18(18 and 18(19 had power to carry on all the works of lowering or changin<; ihe levels of the roadway in Little St. .lames .^tieet as tli.y ilid, and for the same reasons as led me to pni- iioiince ihat the Hon. .liidge Drummond hal no right to sue the Cor|)oration as he did Uir liis dam.ages from theshiitting u|)of St. Felix street, 1 must pronounce that the plainlitl here hud no right to money from the defendants for allcL-cil damages from those works done by them lowering and changing the level of the'roadwiiv ol Little St. .lames street. In doing what d(-- (endants did m that matter they seem to me l, have acted carefully, to have had authoriiv lo do all ihey .lid, 1 do not .see their bv-law eom- plainedofto be null or informal, a'nd tli(iiij;li some damage may have been siiflered by plain- tid, vet she has no right to compensation, for the law aiilhoriznig the works referred to doe.'f not proviile for any. Kor other case.s it has pr j- vided lor compensation ; for instance, where market pl.aces are changed, or where the levels o( lootpathfi or sidewalks are altereil, any per- son whose property is injuriously afiVH^te.i' niii.'^t get compensation. The law of' I t-1,5 Vic. in this respect wa-, at date of institution of ulain- du troi,R-,.if Hvrc. iw M. u. j tiif's action, «iiii m force, and had been, a'ppar- liPOEATIONS. ,,, I 533 MUNICIPAL COEPORATION.S. uvmClVAl. COnPOKATIONS enty.designfyJIy left in force, notwitli^tan-lin- all he clwuiKOs an, I a,!,ii(ion. that lia.l l.een ma( e n, an,! lo the CpponUion Charter Act.. At the aririiiiient l.efi.re me it wan Mate,! I,v defcMMiants c„„„se , an,! not contradi.;to,l, that plain III al,an,l„ne,l lierol.jection to the hvV-law for altennjr St. James street level. Years he- ore the l.ye-h-uv complaine,! of hv plainli,}' was naie tlerewasinlnn.e.a.Mlstiiris^ananien.l- ie t K. the Corporator, Charter Acts, viz.. the --28V.et.,c.(t)(of lHe4;,mentione,l'in,i;|.n! tit } ^' "^"^"' -''''' "'« 'l'"'^'",ianls power to open, e.vteim or wi.ien streets an,i regulales e.>:propriation8. The plaintitf ,i„es not clam, o have inui any property e.vpronn- ate,) nor ,l„e,s she complain of' the si.leu'alk alteio.l. Had she ha.l property exnn.nrii.te.i orlia. tiiP .si,leualk level i!, fr^t ^l^ie, pr 'l Derty heenatere,!, there wa.s provided lUr her by tins Act compensation, to be mea.snre.i accordinsrto the report or ju.iirment of a Tri- bunal 01 Comtnis-ioners. It shall be fi.ved and cle ermined so, say.s the Act. Here in a partie, - lar process ordered Ibr redre,s8 of hucI. .-riev- aiices; so the ordinary process bv. suit and the measiirement of the ,lania;,^es, or compen.sation (or damages (,y a.„„!ge or jiulges in the ordin- an huv court-^ IS excluded. Action dismissed.* .U(>nv.so« V. Mu,,or, &c., of Montreal, S. C. 220. To Impose Taxes.-K county mMnicipal- ity can collect a tax imposed by itself, not on a municipality but on certain individuals in wli.w interest it has opened a road which is a county roa,l, and within its exclusive jurisdii'tioii. hmiardv Con,„n,lioi, of the Coniifi, of Mont- mnrenci, 4 Q. L H. 20H, S. C. 1877. 221. But taxes imposed by the county on iofliU niuu.cipalities can be levied by suciriocal nninicipal, ties only. Taxes ordered to be levied on taxable property belon.tring to persons inter- ested or benehted by any public work are direct taxes by the county, to be levied by it only. 11). "^ 222. The city of Moi.treal, under seo. 128 of Its charter, has a right to impose a license tax on hmchers keepnip; stalls or shops in the city or the sale o( meat or HsI, clsewliere than on the public markets. MalU/.te y. CUu of Mont- real,'! h. N. 2fi3, S. C, 1879. • 22:!. To Issue Pfniihson, Notes.—Xn answer \.o& same arret en main tierce, the tiers saisi, a niunicinality, declared that it owe,! nothing. Ihe pluiutitt contesteil. It appeared liy the evidence that it had owe.l defendant previous to the seizure, but had given him a duly autho- rized promi.-sory note an.l obtained his (iiscliar.re or the amount, and this note was now in the laiids of a thiivl jiarly, to whom they were liable. Plamtilf contended that as the tiern saisiwaR not atraling corporation, and as by the Municipal Code municipaiitieH are not ■•nithorized to niiso money by notes or bills, the noteiiMinestion was radically null, and tbf debt still remained-//,/,/, that is the note was not S^yeii to raise money but to pay a debt, and as It biid passed into the hands of a third party, and plaiutdf was not in a position to otter "it l«ck, that the cittim ofdefendant was diucliarired I 53 1 not recover. le>lf„ix v. I iiud rilaintilf eonh .■i7. S C is-^'""''^""'^ "■^' -'^'''' ^"''' ^ '" ^• rri;f,w'^''" '■'''l"""'«;"t'' obtained a JMd^'i.H.nt e.ii>a,le on a promissory note signed by the iiiayor and .secrelary-lreasuivr of the C.'irour- a ion appellants. The Corporation apina,'.! „ e case bu! did not plead, and having allowed resjiondents lo lake judgment IhevapiH.al,.!, on I.eground that the mayor and VecVetarv had no authority to sign mites on behalf of the Cor- |.omt,onw.,lmut being specially authorized to I. elh.ct by a resolution of the eouncil, and no iiilthorizati.M. had been proved. Aiiieal dis. ;;H;-,onthegi,,,,,ei,|,,\n,eno,e':ii; ,: ''••j'.itlv ivgula.., and the appellant having tkil 1 . lou . c, lid nut obie.n, m appeal . Corporation t £:S'q: h. S:"'' '' ''■ ^' '^''' ^ ' XXV. PowKHs OF Officku.s. 225. To Si,,n Xotes.-TUo secretary-treasurer ol a muiiicpahty has n,, power to 'si..,, noes and ac,.^|,r drafts, ^fartin 7y. Corporation of !i":^^'!'J'! J'""' 'JJ^ L.512,& l(/jt. I,. 2;ii, XWI. Procks-\'khhai,. 22fi. LTiHler Art. Hlil of the Municipal C.de' a /))•,„■,..-««■„, can only be amended Ky another ;;/v„.Av-r,,r„,/ made in the same mannVr. JIol- tonjc Catta„lmn. i) 1{. L. (S^;-,^ q. jj. 1^75 ~~i. A proees-„ert>,tf of a municipal corpor- atinn can only |,e moditied bvanoti.er proeHs- '-M made in hke manner, and anv chan-e which a municipal council may pretend "o nuike m a pror&sverlml, by means ,,f a simpio resolution, IS ab,-olute|y without elfect and mil, . n. such nullity may le invoked at anv time Ilo/ton ct Aihns, ;5 Q. L. R. 2rt'l, Q, U HTr, -^. i he vali.iity of proe!'s-rerl>anx and acts "' ;'Pl"""-t"-> em cannot be triel incidemallv, am tiiey are cnclusive and binding iiiiid set aside l,y direct proceeding., such as furnished ami authorized by the Miim..i;,al Code. Simnrd Q. tT20H:i 'I Sfrf"- "■^' ''^'"'"'"--^ -^ XXVII. QU.M.IFICATION OF Al.DliUMKy. 229. Thequalilication of the dclendaiil, who hai lieen elected alderman of the city <^<^ Mort- real, was attacked as insullicieut. ' Tik' uro. perty quahlication re,p,i,-ed bv the statute was the pos,se.ssion in bis „wn riirht, and alter pav- mont ol all bis ju.st debts, of real estate to the * (Tfl (/u'amenrrrpnrm Vic. m/j. 29, stc 11 1 •O'utlrmod cvelail^-a■,^.ol■i;.,•, 1,, "nnj;.* -al,k. ,h<. .norti-a-o Ml,l.,„t bosn,|,v„|„|, an,i iMust bo hoM To .(),.,. ovory |,art ahlvo, in whi..h case Ins hal, onlho insMlhcent tor <,Mali(i,:at,on. L,.l,a:y ward m the city or Montreal, allefTin.; 1. (he was not a resident, lioiiseliol.ler. ai„l .liil not possess |,e necessary property ,pialili,..ai -V/.A/, that a person occnpyin^r i„.o a.liaeeiit rooms, one as an otiicean,! tliV oFher as aresi - Mice, iN.hecilyolMontroal. isaresi.lenthonso- ^o leriuthetern,sor37 Vic.cap, :,I,sec. 17, an.ltha-, with rejranl to the rearestate, which was u,a,ter partly ot'estirnale or value, tlK-il^n -i- L. (.. ,J. 280, I L. N. 002, S. C. LS78. XXVin. Rkmu.v iatiox of City Attoknky. 2;i2. Action by city atlornev of the citv ,,r ;■':"''?,' ,"■''" 'r' '"■'■";li->ni-oci in the niiiMIe ot A u.ar, tor salary tor balance of the v<.ar, lor (ee^n cases pending ai„l for compensatio, lb extra services-//./,/, ,|,at j.e was entiUcl to "« salary (or the balance of the vear an'l Mlso XXX. J{KSoI,fTIO\S OP. fintlHv;7''r ''''''"''"':' coniplaine,! that thev lia,l s re ,n, '""""' '" '^"•'^''T"'"«e of brolet s leet not beni^- opeiiei) m accordance with a resolution adopted by the council, bv which it ua,- resoK-ed to execute certain m.rks aiu t -pen certain projocted streets-ZA-/,/, that here was no en^anement between the parties o such a nature that the non.e.xecn'tion of tlepn,, .cted works could give rise to re«non sibility for damages on the part of the Corpor- ation. IheplaintiHs had not performed wdu t was incumbent on them, to permit the muni- cipal authorities to act in conlbrmitv to the «^oluion r.lerrin-r to the street in question, and the plaintiHs, having „o acquired right could not complain of being prejudiced bv the huhue to open Drolet .street.' The inde,i>n,t!y niontlis ininie,liaf..|y „rec«iiu» tln^lay o 1 f „ i, I rriH. ■..'.na hy^tate «lil,l„ tli,.«Ktd city of the valu r of ti:,n :;;^;; i;^,'!;:!^:'' ^^s^^^ f^-ne... o.- a^2' ---i-i.. _. _. -,ic, caj, t,i. SVC. i;. 036 claimed, moreover, wan not foracliial and direct 'himages occasioned by the bad stale of the roads and streets, but for remote and uncertain ;lj'm»^;-, based on hopes and chances o a ro l-maical nature of i-rolit to be derived fC, c .s>l.' m small lots of land which the plai'- tils had puivhased for speculalive purpose" A<; ion dis.nissed. ]h;u,[t .t CnriZHZZ I ilhuj,- of Cute St. Lmiis, S. C. 1 871) ^ ^■A- Where the jilaintitr asKcl to have a .•esolntion of the City Council of Mont rea set aside on the strength of anticipated action by the Legis ature-y/./,/, „o in'teiest, and d ! s!'a isso "'"" "■ ^'''y "-f ^'^"''■^'"'•^^'- ^k XXXI. KmiiT OF CoixTV Coi-n.„. to Pito- t'tKl) FOU Ta.XKS. 2;i3. The only means of collecting asse«. n.'iisd.ie to a county counc, lis bv7neaiis 'of •'6 local nmnici|,alitiesnnd (heir oHicers,* „, XXXI V. Rights of, ovKit Stukkts. 2;i(;. Where the Corporation of the Citv of Montreal jiad closed one end of a slivel- l!v which sonie ofthe ptvperty situated thereon was alleged to have depreciated in value, and action of damages was brought-//,./,/, that this wa ot such an interference with a servitude as to g ise loan action of ,lamages, nor did it coii- Mitute expropriation so as to give ri-lit to nre- limmary indemnity under the specialAct The Jj. 0. J. 1, P. C. 187G. XXXVI. Roads. concerning puldic roads homologated bv the deemlai, IS- //«/,/ t|„t only ratepayers -have arigbt to notice of .such iiroci-s-nvM. M'-Enla 70S o.' ,^V."l/'"^''"' w''^',"" authorized bv Art. T^^o^the Municipal Code.t for the conversion cipaliteTcld.'! , :;";^i„^;!,''':,''"7'"':f "•> "« a^? -""i- iiuuc muuicpallte."^ '768 M.i;. "" ''" " '''''"■° ^PORATIONS. o3tJ ot (bi-actii!il and direct till' liiKJ Hiatc of the I'CMioii' iiriil UMccrtiiiii and ithaiiccs ol' a |,ro- ilil to lie derived fioiii land wliicdi ilie iilmii- siieciilativo purposes. '/(■/ it Ciii-imi-atidu (if ', S. C. IS71). •' titr asked to liavo a iiiii(;ii of Moiilreal Net anticipated uetiuii Ijy no interest, arjil dis'. «;TY Coi-.Niii, TO Plio- of colle('(ing assess, oiincd is liy means of nd their oHicers,* as i-* no ri^rlit to (iroceed 'payers hy action ur fpiiration (ij Leci.f, 7 rKi{ Stkkkt.s. ation of ilie Ciiv of end of a street" hv sitnated thereon wiis in valne, and action Hi'h/, tliat this was ith a servitude as to luges, nor did it con- to ;;ive ri,i;lit to pre- he special Act. T/ie & Vrumiitoiid, 22 ash a prnrt!s-rifi-lial oinoloiiateil by the ly ratepayers "iiave •ea-ri'i-lKii. M>;Enla Bwjot, 7 R. L. ;iOO, authorized by Art. for tlie conversion rast>epar un coiispll de I apecialps est prelevi's 'Ur loiites ies Cdrpora- tioii de la valeiir t( tale u paiemeiit. U8S .M, C. raiion locale ciinstitue iwil till cumte d'apivs inine^ par ce cnnseil. lette e.st perfu dans la iw liwales »ur tuus los taxe sans quMl sirit « "U ordros rt c.a efl'ot. icu ilo 111 jiQrt ilo la : ipii: lui li cie imixisi-o la maiiii'ru indiquee li ^'solution ou dans un on il'iino corporation te soil ii I'avunir un la direction exclusive I ravenir un .lioniin lioration de la mniil- ! sltue uu nn'il ocparo 537 MUNrcPAL CORPOnATIONS. OT.MCPA,, COnPOnATIONS. 538 Of a cmnly road into a hiral road, and vi,;- rjrs,, need ..^y be published ac.'ordinfr to A.'t If ri the counties iuleresled. Ih 2.i.l. And a de-i^-nalion of the taxable pro- perty ,n a;.,v.,VreW.,/ by reference to the ' ,t «'fiutivPn,„nbersinthe valuation roll indk.- li,L snob property is le^al and regular. Ill -W A iMunicip;!,} council cannot Indi) it-elf toapieceof land lor the purpose of n,ai„; a road nnt, ,t h„s proceeded 'to a valuation"." tin lai ( (lie manner |>rescribed bv Art ')0';t and loilo ng of ,|,e Jrnnieipal Code. lioll',,, HI. Jn the case of a petition of ratepayers of a .numcipality dennin.liuK the acti, n "of the ;•'"""•''"'"'"; "Pl'"i'"ttH.nt^f a superinl.Mde I o .vport. on t KM.pening a,,d n,ainUM,ance of a !.'■';. t'ose who on an appeal from the deci-ion u tin board o delegates are called //,//.,.., I,v tl>e Mumcpal Co.le shouM be the petitioners named at the bottom of the petition, and not tie co,-poi;'« of the board lia;enot voted iIk^ .lecision „nist be .leclarrd irregular and null; and in such case the cm' rendei the judgment winch the board shouhi have rem ered, but sin,ply annul the decisio ■'I Icine l,e ,,arties to act according to law in I mgmg the pror!:.-,-e,-bal before The board figain. lit, 244. Appellant was sued before a justice of te,H'ace M' $l(..lo, special assessment arll!^,!: out of the opening and maintenance of acoiintv cr;m,v''V'r"''''''''"'''^•i'''■'■^'''^^'-''•"•^^^^^ connl.\ ol Montmorency, and establishin.' com- imnication between St. Fereol and the main ruaii Appellam was cond-mne.l to pay the Mtiiwenianded and $I;U() costs, and ,,n!h'l(;lh JiiU his goods were 8ei«.,l in execution of the .ig.nent. He unmediately sne.l out a writ of prohi Mtion addresM-d to the .justice of the peace an; the bad itf charged with {he sei.nre-K ares, 'iT '"''%''" '''^''^ "^ "" prohibition to " e t the procedure taken liefore a magistrate , „ 1- ■" ""' ."'"'V'S '*'"' '"^'it't'-nancl. of a oad, It lliere has been no appeal from the Jomologation ot' the proci^..,lLl withi e a equH'edbylaw all .el r''"'"'^"'"' '","'- J"nsdiction of tl,e agist.ate by appearing beloie him and plea,' "tig to the nierits. Sumrd v. ro,-pon,ti„n\,t ihe tout Mu,""' "Vis public h i-tt aprfes iD^ihTr,"''"'? *.■"■ ™'*" "'"' formalities to be observed in the expropriatiou of property.-Eu. dTsVnvr I '"1"' "'/e'"' '? I'"-^' '''"""^''- '■"■■ liavinr. o iiK ane. Ihe declarat on alleged im- nK^:..,a use of the lane 1,^, he general mho taut f "li"'"'"-'" "'";"""-' """ ""■ '•' i^abi- ai Is (it the vdlage pas.sed bv the lane in ,|nes. n.n was insnllcient, more e;,,eciallywhe,Z iHUs appeared to mdicale tliat the lane w s a(l.ioinn g proprietors. C\,rp„ralh,H nf SI V,,,-- 24(;. One P. was the owner of a piece of land ;;"'nng one of the corners at tlu. jum. i, 1 f wo roa, s ,n He pari^h of St. Jcion e. A, h s o.i..r there had been no lence for upwa I .f hilly years, and the public had durin- iha .'""■ been in ,he habil of eui.in./ e 'a de lo^l:r;■;^,i.,;■r,t-;,--lJ'r^;;;;;:i;;- f!:f iop!^;:;;,--i-;:;;|.:i;i: .^ land. Plaintifl complained of ihis "ce a a nur^ance and sued the Corp,,rat tora t, dt? lis Ian or-.-"'." ''"•■'•'H' '■'"''" "^enclose •ndt lo, "V'""l«'^" 1"-1k'iI taken more nd an b dong,.! tohMu, an action would lie for enc'roachment, but there was „„ acti n ag'ains, the municipality lor an ,d.s, ct on of a nnisance under the Municipal Code sZ 1 247. Inscription in review of a iud-nient of ti.e .Superior Court at Arthabaska ord erin . a peremptory writ of .nandamus to is>ue com* .Mandmgihedefendanisto open and ccm.ilt'e ten, 1 /'","" '"""iH.rs eighteen an.l nine- « c II, in the tenth range of the township of Wick- hii, un.erap..,,alt,v,,foneth..usan!i.l,dla.s. nun I r "1'-'"'' '"''• ""^ P''tiiim,eran,la 11 ,be ot .,ther persons present.,] a petition o the Corporation delendalit, piaving that ey ; " . ;U the roa.l slmuld be exten.le.l as tnn.d el I, ,1 ^7'lf' •■'"^" ^-''C'll'l tl'i'.k lit. On the 11th ol (he follow,ng tnonth the netitioner I'li'l .others presentcl a petition to tl e ■ y """"^'pi'lHv, praying tliat the front road be'^ di", \n'r!''''"'^'r''^^'''''-''^^'''-'ow". Mllp ot Wi.-kham might be opene.l Iron, the leT:;,"l'"' ''•;;","; ''onnda'ry line be.we,? the townships c, W ickham an.l (irantham to C|.nne,M with the Tenth Ha,,ger.,a,l I,, eowm Mii|,ol G,.an,ham, ,n said countv. The conn v counci then appoint..! a special sitperuiten!:,^ ho ,ade a report an.l ?'.oc..-.c.W.a/, purport- on ire "Vl" 'r'"*""«""erand when ihe roa.l le ma.le. Ihe secretary-treasurer thi,d[niii(;i|',al Code.* that llip roads in <)iieslion should be eoiintv works. tMiliseqiientlv.oii the lltli ,Se|)tpiiiber fillowin.', withonl a'^sijrninjrjuiy reason lor the ehaiiL'P, thp county eoiinoil deolared the roads in question to be ]o<>al work.s within the niuineifmlilv nmv rppreseiiled by the defendants— //,/,/, "under these circunisfaneps, that the road in(|uestioii, bPin^Mi loeal mud, had not been le;:allv e>lalf- lished by the county council, and tiiat the order of the county council liiat the road in question should h". a local work was inoper- ative, for want of tlip notice and piililieafioii re- quired by law, Hathwill V. ('ori,„n,ti„n of J) '■■■ he has not coven- anted to pay them ; ami therefore the tax mi-lit ui effect fall (m the Crown ; fmt paragrapn 4. section :M of t;ie Act, which givesthein i^.wer to tax tieiiaiits, limits that power to 3 cei.i- in hedctaron the aimmnl of the rent; at..i in this ease it is udmittH the roll has levied it on th*- value of the property. Therefore the nidgnient is wrong— for there is no authority to Ipvy Ft OD the value of the property ; aiili it should be reforme.1 by giving ju,j^rn,ent to the opposaiits for Si:!.25, without costs, and rever- sing tlie rest of iit in favor of the plaintiff, with costs, larsoii.1 v. Mayor of Sortl, S. C. K. 1871). 253. Taxfifl paid under an existing bve-Iiaf cannot be recovered until the bye-law has been S^^tisn'"'^-''^'^'^"-' -^^-^ {PORATIONS. 540 iiipnt n;.miiist tlio i]p. IJt'Mcli fill- .«o:iic l*r2— PxiU'lcd I'iMin licr liiiy. Thiin proiK'i'ly wliicl, 'J'iip oxcciiiidn o( Ihi-i ■ tlic (li'li'iHliintH, who hu-jivr iiriKimil liiic io lu'c till- lirst .|(>ri,iiii(|, (iix was ( oiil('y|ci| liv 1 lliiit tlicjiiiliriiientof Cll lIlCSC llllllls ('XCIII|jt 111/ the (.hiirf—i'\i,, BfiKtIi uiiildiiliteillv liiU licloro (he lovyiiu' hiiil iihvavs I'ddiiiicif ill so, uikI whs, "as ul rates iliiposuhle hv sdiil lilts." 'I'he 11.1- rpcdi-d is that the tax '2 and '".'i, has hecn 'sees of (lie siiiil pro- t'llicfiiliie oj'ihe pro- •lit iif the rent. Not- ;0 aihiiitted hy the iiid'.'iiieiit is stated in > he, " (jtie h'.i (titfx ii/i'f rt iifi'iipatidii lies dgiiieiit luiih'r review PI to its Cull extent, is to the lUiKiiiiit ot' liy the answer, and lave l)eeii jiid^iineDt (vithoiit costs, iiM thp ahor, ele., that were as re^'ards the main are in this (ta^e al- )• wiiat the t^ieeiiV .ve no rif;ht to do at (itl'as proprietor, and he other eotirt, iioih tor anil hecausr the They then wished liv taxing the les.iec. se ; we have only the IS to wdiat it is \ li\u or on tni'iiiiii: ti,> the e are two ix'ints ok !., by the 3« sec, ic y, to say tlie leasi, Jtly laxiiifr properr- xatioii ; (or hy that rifrht to deduct all ' he has not coven- Te(ore the tax nu^ht ; hut parujrrapii 4, h piveBthein iii>wer power to .'! cen:- in ;/' the rent; atni in e roll has levieil it 'rty. Tiieretbre the re is no aiitliority to le property ; anii it ng jiidirrnent to the out costs, and rever- " the plaintitl', with of Sintl, S. C. 1{. m exiRting hye4«w le live-law has been f Mo.:' ^J, i L. ii". 541 JIUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. 251. In an action for arrears of nitinicipal ta.ves, It IS not neeessarv to produce (lie orV'i- nal collection ndl.s, and proid' of the notice required hy Art. !)«() of the Municipal Code, nndol trueahstr.. ;-oni (hi llecdon rolls, IS .siidieient. („i. , iU,n of Toirnxhi,, nf Ac- U'lik 1-ilton, 24 L. (;. J. nil, S 0. 1{, 1S79. 2:m. a person who idaiins a total exemption from taxes may, if proceeded iii;aiiist as a rate- payer, avail himself of the remedy allowed to ratepayers under Art. 970 of tl,'e Municipal Code.* Miiiili-eiil Cottm, C;. S: Coiuoratiuii of n'u" .''^ •'^'"'"''"''•y "f rtiUqificld, 'i L. N. :!!7, •lout cmitribimblo qii( est rcquLs de pnyer comme t xes munlclpBleH nu soolairei. «,,e soiiin.o ,.!,,, .leveo qii'elle lie , lev-mil etre est adinis I'l plaiiler on fait par exdiition a I'encoiitie do toute action „u iiclainalion ou 1 article 'Ml nur liieiis meiible,« ot ollet-' (Vtti. (ipposition dolt etr.. acconipadiir.o d'inio affiilavit »lJnll'!"I M y''r"»'5 'If alj,.«at,on»',,n'elle c,„uien ",r, sl^i 111,. iX I'oHicier charge do rexeeulien du man.lat (le I du district ilans les hint jour.* Kuivant.s ou devaiif la com' da, ".'.'?'■"",','"'""/'"'?'""" ♦'"""''• '■^IK"-'*' ensi.lte ente - delacoiir ™' ° ''"* "■'■«'"' °"l""'l''« "e procedure L'lipiiositlon opiTo palsio si olle c»t acconipaKni'e d'un Su r ;.'/ T '■"''! "'K"' ..car I" juffo „u par le muRistrat le e^t'rTp'portime.'" «'''"'"'" '" """^ '^^'vant la.fuelle elle WUIl MITOYEN. 542 256. DemnmJ i,f Vmjment of.—K demand of W"!''!'' tif (axes in virdie 'of Article %\\ of the Municipal Coile,' addre.sspil to a wife separ- ate as to pro|ierty, and liv her traiismilted in envelope addressed to her hushaiid, is siitKeient. torpiinill,,ii„fthe Villiii/eofJiieiiril/c v. Gil- lespie, q L. K. ;m(j, <;. C.'lSHO. . 2u7. And (he Circuit Court lias jurisdiction m such ca.ses no matter what the aii iil. Ih. it 1,1 If Commi.sxtiire.i (l',cile tie Sit ten/ v. 6'(/i- yras, >\ Q. L. H. 355, S. C. R. 1880. MUNICIPAL TAXES. I. Prkscuii'tion- of, nee PRESCRIPTION. MUR ]\IIT()YEN-;Sfee SERVI- TUDES. ul . , ."" '^"''■" '" •''•■"'""'e du paienient de toute» lex tuxes et ,s,.ninie.s lie denieis portces au role de perci'p. lion et mm encores piT^ues aiix personiies obliL'res de lea J K„l':',"J;'""',r ">'■"''"'" "" '■"'^'"" ''it-''"li"ipai;ne d'un etnt ' snapped the plaintiff was seriously injured bv tlie recoil -/A-W, reversing judgment of court below, that there was contributory ne^'li- gence on Ins part, and he could not recover n ",'2cf • ''«'■'"'« & JJompiem, 1 L. N. 5, Q. 1). lo77. NEW TRIAL-^^ee JURY. I- GROrNOH OF. r /L'^vT''-^'^,';-,'"'''^'"^"E»'EANOR,sce CRIMINAL liAW, NkW i RIAL. I. Gi;<)iiNt,s OF. ■*. Tlic defendants Iw-ing condemned in $7000 by tlie yeivlict of a special jiirv (or danui^res Huflere,! by idHintilf througl, a,, accident wliicl, occiinTd while riding on delendants raihvav applied tor anew trial, on thegrounds that, Ni. tlie evidence was against the verdict ; 2nd, miJ direction ; and ;ird, exces-ive damages.- //,/,/ '" 1 nvy Council, that the ijuestion of evidenrt' was not open to the appellants ; that the foll.,w- ing words „!■ the judge-'' Fir.st of all was there time to give notice? That of course is easily answered, there was time. Then was there a possibihiyofdoin ' il?-iliat isthe,,uestion,",li,i iiotcoiistilute mi.sdirection and that under tiie circumsiaiices* the amount awarded was nut excessive, and the new trial should liave been retu.se,!. Lumbkin & South Eastern Jiailwiii, Co.,3L. N. I(i2, P. C. 1880. •' NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS. I. What are, ,sw BILLS OF EXCHANGE AND PROMISSORY NOTES. ^^"^^^^ NEIGHBORING PROPRIETORS. I. Rights of, see TRESPASS. NON-JURIDICAL DAYS. I. Act Concebnino. Whereas it is necessary to amend article.?, 2 and ;! of the Code of Civil Procedure respecting non-juridical d.-iys and to remove certain doubts on this subject; Therefore Her Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Legislature of C^uebec, enacts as follows : ^ 1. The word " Governor" in article 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure means indiflerentlv the Governor General of Canada or the Lieut-Ouv- ernor of this Province, as the case may be. 2. The first of July, the anniversary of tlie (Jay on which the British North America Act came into force, shall in future be considered a non-juridical day, as if it had been mentioned in Art. 2of the said Code, and if the first of Julv, should happen to fall on a Sunday then the .second of July shall be considered a non-juridi- cal day. I * See Railways, Liability op. rOAL DAY'S- 511 U'KKS. I'liMSHKi), Hce i.ii;i:l iipw.-paper may "ue hig 'iTv of the nriMiiiiit dui' the ilisfrici wht'rc ilu. |iuHtci|, ami il i.s tlicre ioii arises. Xiiiirran ■ . L. 5«, C. C. 1HT7. -See JURY. lAXOR.sceCKIMLVAL ? condemned inS7nnn, :ial jury tor danm^'tn it;li iin iiceident whiuii I defeiiihints niilwiiv, tliegrouiids that, I>t, lie verdict ; 2w\, mis- ive daniai;es. -/A/,/, iiuestioii ul' evidiiicc inis ; that the luh..w- KirHt ol' all wan tli.re t of course i.s ea-ily Then was tliere a It is theijiiestion,"iii(l and tliat luuler tiie int awarded was nut al shoujil have iiccn th Eusleni Jinilwtii/ 3. •' 545 NOTARIES. NOTARIES. ^.L DAYS. to amend articles, Procedure resijecliiii; move certain du\ibts Eler Majesty by ami t of tlie Legislature ' iu article 2 of the ins indifferently the a or the Lieut-Guv- le case may be. anniversary of tlie forth America Act lire be considered a ad been mentioned .1 ifthelirstofJnly, i Sunday then the idered a non-juridi- ;t. ProeeedinRs and sales whinli have taken pla.'e on a day ol thanksgiving (-nlercd either by lb.. (Joven.or Oenerai or the Lient.Oovernor, prior to the passinj,' of this Act, shall be .leen.ed valid, as ifthey had taker, place on the day IL,|. loHiiij,' such thuuks^iving dav. 4. Artiide ;i of the said c'le applies to sales ainioiinced I,, be made by authority of justice. C'. The present Act shall, in so Lv as it shall apply, lurm part of the Act re-^pecting the inierprelatiun of the Siatutes of tiiis Provinc.., 31 Vic. cap. 7. IJ. Xothin- in Ibis Act shall apply to any ob- jections already raised belbre the cJurts in hi ease now pending. 7. The piesent Act shall .■onie into li)rce on the day of its Hinction. Q. .12-4:! Vic. cap. ]y, j NOTAItlAL DEVim—See DEEDS. 546 NOTARIES. ri!()H!vno.\''' '^' ■"'■''''"«■'' "^• ')":», see I.M- II. I'KKS .VXD ChaROKS OP. III. li.WK A KHillT TO l.K PAID Co.ST OF OltKi- IXAI.S IlKh-ultloFntMslllM, CoiMKS IV. LlAIUMTY I'Oll 1m.KS ok. A. NkKI) not UK doLVKn wAfTION TO SKT AsiijK A i)i:i.:i) OK Sai.k. acts e.xecuted ber.,re a notary are jointly and ;; severally I lalde („r his disbiirseinent.s and <',M T 1 ""■,''"';"i^l""K of copies, extracts, ^^ tille deeds ordeeds ot anv nature whatsoever, is not to be considered a presumption of iiay- ^^ meiit ot the cosis and te,s of a nolaiv, and 6n ^^ nolary is lK,i,nd to furnish copies oi" e.Uracts ot any deed to third parties, or ev^n to the ^ liarties tliemselves, if |,e is not paid the (,ri- • >{inal cost ol the minute, ifal the time piesLTio- tion has not been acquired." The liicts were admitted : the notary bad the miniile in his JMiSM'ssioi,, and the cost of it had n..ver been "lid or ollered. 1 be parly who petitioned, and «ho wanted to «et the deed, had two preten- Mons.-.l.|,.„t, he said the creditors were bound pay tor the deed ; his .second prelension wa.i I thestaiute,|,d not .speeilicallv repeal art. - 1- ... L.l . by naine.as re,|.iired by Hr. l„ter- p.etalion Act ot bsiis. i{,u ,„ „„,j-,|,^. answered that the statute only .xphm.s ,be .'■b.,h art. ot the V,„W.-Jlr/,f, reversm.r, Mua h< notary was not bound to furnish copies till l'«7U '-^^''"^ ^ L'Arrhevequc, S. C. R. II. Fi;i:s A.Ni) CuA llliKS OK. .'. Action tor the fees and disbursements of tl'M'.i^"""!. a notary l.ublic. in ilrawiiw a r,,,,. posi, i,.n deed betwejM, i...t.S. and (heir cred.turs. he plaintil Uv Ins aclion cliarjjed f,,,- ,be 'nuvin.o, the deed SiiO, and for his .serviies tie'' o'fl ", r-'V'' ",r*'""'"' "'■■""«!■ the coun- esoi ])„iehesler, lieauce and Quebec, to see he creditors and induce them to sf..,,, .■%17.; end U^r a copy ^S.-y/,,/,/, Uiat even "u.^fer Q. 31) Vic. cap. .f.i.seo. 22, which makes parties to i-'iiriai acts jointly and Heveraliy liable to the notary lor his lees and disbursement.s the par- ies to the act in quest,,,,, could not be held ^nly n^^Heverallylialdelorthesaidsmnsof III. Have A Right to hk Paid Costs ok Oiti- 'ilXAl.S IIKKOKK FlI!.VI.S|11N(J Col'lKS. G- Plaintiir.upplied to a jud.ire to compel a' "'"i'f.v fo turnish him .a ci.py uf a deed of con,. I l-)t,oi,!o„d,ichl,ewaso,,eof.heparties'H I ncht e notary relu • to .ieliver'withoiu 1, - ing pad the cost ol the ori-inal. The iud>'e ordeivd the deed to be given Cn payment jt h coHof a copy n,erely ; and the notary inscribed '" ''''^'\- i}<^ mn'^" 1 his refu.sa! bv refe,- eiiceto the Provincial .Statute 39 Vic.'C 33 actions 22 and 23, which say :-" Purtie; to IV. LlAIUMTY KOK FeKS OF. 7. There was an authority given by the court to sell some ival estate belon^'ing lo the heirs P accoriling to the h.rmaiiiies usual ,„ such case.s' ;:,',t •:V'';''-"''^''^™';ll"'^'-igl''-tothepla,ntitI ^vas llie notary named to carry out the sale. 'J'he 'i'-' I'.vthebailil, named 1,1 the order of court, and oneot ibe lots was Ibrmallv adimL....! to the 'li'l^'iidant. rheplainiilfsued'theiletVndantas spurcha.sertorecoveracHnmissionofd percent, a having I,,..,, madep.tyable to him by ihecon- Jinons ol the .sale. Tlie prur?s-i„-ri;„/ of the bai 111 showed the condition was that the 4 per cent, wii.s „, be paid to the auclioneers. Ji,,the Co,/c/ -Several points were raised, siu'i, a.s there being no ja-ivuy between the adjiidicataire '-'-' ;.1'« ";<^'ry ; but without g„i,ig into I e M'l^-tion whelherthis was a .slipulaUon bv the ven.lors with the a.ljudicatau^e lor the benefit of H "n-d pa,.ty_.„ ,,. t. .,ve to that party a right o\'tuln'\ "?• '" 7" !"*""'' "'^'■'' i-"o evidence ol the condition that is ,Uleged ; Ibr the allega- tion is ol a contract by the adjudicataire to pay • per ce,it. to the notary,a„d the p,-ooi; acconl- Mg o the;.,v,r«-ar/.„/uf the ollicer appointed by the court to sell, is that thiscmmi.s.'io,, was i>"t to ^o to the notary, but to the auctioneer : and there is nothing whatever to give it to the notary, i,nle,ss the notary can giveu to himself 1 he ariti shows that the charge is not e.vcessi Ve but the question as to whom the adjudicataire was to pay reinams the .same, and the conditions a.nced up,,,, between the ven.lors an,l the notary ';ould not bind the piu'chaser, unless they were annonnced to h„n. I limlit impossible to .say. in the lace ol the prorr.s-o.-riHi/ of the otHeer that this essential allegation of the plaintiH-,^ demand is proved, it is therefore unnecessary o notice the point whether S, who was tutor to two ol the minors, was leally a purchaser at all under the agreement between all the parties as o tue cuscs m which it was to be consi.lered that there was to be no sale. Then it is to bo observed also that this commis.sion, even if m ,"«: m m J 'in ' 'il 11 f I?' IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) ■V^ f K 1.0 I.I |50 ''"^" 11:25 ill 1.4 2.5 2.2 2.0 18 1.6 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 \ <^ L17 \ :\ ^^S'^^^ f o i/.. '^ ^ 647 NOVATION. pa.vnble to the notary himselr, waa only to be paid at the (.xecntioii oftlii' ilee.l, and none lias liwiuxccutcd, nor lias aiiv been tendered l.y tlie vendor,- to llie purcliiiser for execution, tli.nii'li i>.,onliis own liehalf, signified his imhvidmil readitiesM to execute one. Tliereliire the jud.'- ment IS to perly and remain In iwssession of it for over a year, had debarred b.imselt the riaht of de-trov inif what mi-ht have been originally a nuisance to him i and, m.twithstandiiig the subsemient iibaiidonment of the wharf and gangway, aimei- Cl 1878. ''''^' ^ ^- ^- "'•'P- ^'^'^^■ NULLITfi DE DfiCRET-&e SALE, JUDICI.\L. NULLITIES, ciii/'' ^"'^"'*"^'''* ^'^'''^' «« SALE, Jn)i. NUN'S ISLAND. INSTn'l-TIo'^NS ' '^'^''''^"''''' *«« RELIGIOUS 0. SUMMARY OF TITLES OATH ^;°; OBLIGATIONS "■' 54,, OBLIGATIONS PREJUDICIELLEs!"' crj OCCUPATION ■ rr'., OFFENCES ; g'.g OFFICERS OF COMPANIES."!*..' 553 OFFICEltS OF COURT '" 553 OFFICIAL COUNT ,.-.3 OFFICIAL NOTICE 5... OFFICIAL OATH 553 OFFICIAL PLANS AND BOOKS OF REFERENCE g-.j OIL MEASURE r.!-.'. OPINION ...;; rj, OPPOSITION.... ':: OPTION ■.■■■..■.■.■■.;.*; M3 ORANGE ASSOCIATIONS.".'.'.'." ,5(i{ ORDERS IN COUNCIL '."" r,,;. OWNERSHIP,. ""5G1 ' > ^'ERDRAPTS ■.'.'.' 6G4 ISLAND. 648 ANGE. EOT Lost by Timk, wliarf in the heil of the ioli comnmiiicatcil wiili 1" a Kiiiijrwiiy, and |ia,l tliis wImrC and its up. .wliPii i'e.s|«ini|('rit, on tlie was a pulilii; tiiiisanue, coiiiiiuinicatioii wliioli trC ami the HJiorc. A|). indanianes, ami pravci ■«1. Alter i?i«iie joi'ncii leinentary plea.allegin;; II of tile ai:tii)ii, one c! rl.Vthe wliiirl'passcl to rectcil buildiiifTs winch on €(• tiie brid^re and Jndent liaviii;; alloHd angiya.v on pudlic pr.> isesrijon of it lor over a ?ll tlie riiilit ofde^trov- norij;inally a iniLsince ■iidiiij; tlie sulisoipient rf and gangway, appd- substanlial dania/os, S. C. Hep. 570, ,Su. ;RET_^ee SALE, riES. '■, see SALE, Jcui- LAND.. iON, see RELIGIOUS Paqe D BOOKS OF S.).'! 5»;! 554 554 5(i3 fS M;i 5iU m\ 5G4 5^» OBLIGATIONS. OA'ni-See JUDICIAL OATH. L Of OmcK, .sec EVIDENCE. OBLIGATIONS. OBLIGATIONS. I. AiTKR.NATivK, see CONTRACT i . m- AIixoHs, .see MIXOIUTV " Jll- toMiiTioxAi,, .»eeC().\TI{ACTS. V !>'''''*'''■■'' '•"' *««I'AY.\[l.;Nr V. mjl.KIJATlOX OK, AwlIYl'OTiiKC .Tui.kmaJ;'''"'"'"' ^'"•"^■•^"'kkatio.v fok, ,ee SALE, VH JoixT Axi) Sevkuai,. V J II. IjKsiox. I J^'''!/l'l ( 'oii.siJemtion. lA. Novation of. l-RA I) IN AVOII.A.VK OF, .see hliW]) A tMoxKi, Mv AciKXTS, See AGENCY. All. SlIllUKJATIOX. XIII. With a Tkrm. I. Al.TKKXATlVE. L Tiie delondants atrreed uitli »iin;.,(;(r, . pa.v.hen.*1000ifti,e/wonld\nt^,r;'S,,';! i»j: press ,„ ,|H.,r pre.n.ses. and at the end x nunlh.s either pay the.n $l,5(l„ „,„,« o r e ,. n l.en. I,e press u,d,roken. I'iain.ifis" ..^ . these lenns an.l pm ,„• tin. press, and at the' . , 0. - X tnonti.s, delendants „o, Inuin. paid , ' •4,.j00,.,rretnrned thejiress, i.ronjrlir.ietion ( r [he atnonnt-//,./,/, ciisl.Mssin. ti,e c io | r there was no al.olute asreenient to pay i, ...oney.- //„« & Mulliu, 2 L. N. S^ S- C. IV. Dkfaui.t IX, 2. Wliere no S here was no a<:ceptar,ee of llie del.,' ', '' VII. JoixT AXI) Skveiial. ')■ Wiiere lonr defendant; lilainiifl, were condemned t chiidr t».7i;n..onof*io;;i;m;;^';;;>;;:'''3^^^^^^ he ndde for more than f^.ol) t^cl "e ,. ° !!"' " !'.^- <" f'^'.v more than that a mo n -V/ T/ "'"' ."'^'-v were not liai.le joinllv and evetlly' lor the costs of tiit Ins share. C'rerier HCtion, lint oniv c^ch lor V. CrcL'ier, 9 R. j,. 31;^^ V. DKl.UtJATIOX OF. ■S. Contestation of a coHocation on an a'.si- ;v"> inrtiuMvs,,p„i,,,,,H,,i,,^. ;,,,,,,, '■^Jj'-;-^^^ "vvetl,er,.hlofreleasinjr«nv por .,"0 j, f'';'l Iron, the hypothecT.t cont'est , d r 1 I? P';r arpent for tl,e portion ,|,s- I e', "■'"'"•*'l".''"".V,^oMtl,ela.,dtotht n«ulvei,t, WHO, exercising; the riglit of discliar.4 "hove mentioned, paid a sntlicient sn , o 'i^! coiinl ot the pnrclia.se money to relea I ,uf the property roo, the liypothecary c .^,1 , ol' ,0,' estant Tlie m.sol vent also o!„ao„'d ,hmi ti^.i.a,se 01 ^ame portion of the land from •Couflrmcd In Itevlow, 3 L. N. 1G8, S. C. li, 1880. S. C.I,S77. 'i. I'nilesslonal attorneys who carrv n,, 1 • I'^sunderalirn. nanlearejo^,^,^'i;:;!- lly liahle tor money.s Collecteii iJ , V 0>n^>et ^ Ben,.,;, 22 L^C^jl^.tl^rcJ'-: V Rnt iheohlijration of children la «„, . ,. "t. m.ii-rent parent is not join a 1 . e . '' ?n each child IS coiwiemned to contr I .0 " {:n.;rs';'c.=^- -^^^-^ v"t.;;:j::7 "'"1 severally liahle lb tl e k^^ • ''" ''"'^ rest, tin, therelVom, and t^hat t the caJl^'!"^ :inrhai:i''r;''it'''''"r"-^''^i''-''v';m,':".;^ aii\ iialile tor the value of i|,c „.ood cm •! > 1 ..n.,awav.^^..J,^.^,,,,,^,,,,,^--| su;!dS7hVv;::,;nSr-ft^S;,'nr:'r L.N.t;.i,.t24L.C.J.21(i,Q.'B;Ur ' ' VIII. Lksiox. and, hivwer in Pennsylvania! ailrd;.'!!!!:!? !:<:':; ;i:;:;:;p;;:i;.-;i;;:,:^-',:vas^no;vn-;:; «vu,s snddenly repor'.ed to b le'V heir "r""" estate lu Au.tralii. He enterej^nto":, «%."! w i '1 i :: 1 :, |i ^'m n ' ^ i '1 i 1 Hi 1 t H 551 OBLTGATIOXa. OBLIGATIONS. I ■ i '1; i merit widi hi-. .Mnployer (Imt tl„. latter slionM cn,,,,lvl,u„ will.,,,, ,iollar.-u wrok, ui„l uN.. ,|„„|,.,| |,i^ iiil.'iiil,..nil(. halms 1.11,1 that he vva. not on i.inul terms will, planitilf when the aL-reeineiit was jnn.le-y/, ,/ iha, ,he eonHWeraiioi, was not iiwtiil,ai„l plainliirwoiiM ,,r,lv ,re| jiMh'nient f.;r the aiiM.uhi he ha.l ,lisl,u,;e,|. L'/.odes S: IX. XoVATlOX OK. 12 I he appellant, on the Kith Septemher lH(a, heinj: in ililliciilties, ^.,,t his cnMlitors to eii;ii a eoinposilion asji-eeinent of Vls.M. in the J., pnvalile in lour instalmeiits, he .'ivin,' his l)romiss.,rv notes for siiuli iiisialiiienl's, anj H,,. iii-t o( them hem^' speciallv jrnaiaiiteeil hv four persons or (inns. This aiireeinent was cainnl oiil o„ the part o( his ere,!, tors who look Ills notes and jrave np their evidenees of hi- j'i'l''l"<"lii''-<. Ilieap|)ellant went on with his hnsiness and paid his first and second instal- iiients piinrinally. Fdliiifr on the llmrth of April Lijiay the third he was, on the 2Sih of tl.at inonlli. (bived into ins,,lveiiev l,v a new creditor, i ne fourth instalment' wa's fons... (pienlly not paid, and thereup.,,, the respondents demanded and received Irom two of the securi- ties liic iinioniit of their share o( the .seciiriiv givi'ii. J lie other two had themselves in th'e meantime trone into insolvencv. I'po,, the an- jMlants estate ihey claimed at lirstonlv lor tile jalance ol ilieir composition, hut afl.'rwards they chaiiL'ed irroiind and increaseil their claim HI as ,o cover the l.alance of the oii-inal del.l less llieir receipts on account olthe composition Jlieappelia:it.havinirreceivedfroin the assi.-nce n reconveyance of his estate in terms of a d.vd 01 compositnm and discharL'e fi i his credi- tors, conte-led the collocaiion, ,,n ih nnnd that It mi-htonly u;o lor the unpaid halai of (he old composition. The contestation turned on the following clauses in the ori-mal deed of coinposiiion : "And it is decFared ^_ and aiireeil that in the event of the said .1. A. I{. LMiii-,' into or hein;: forced into insol- veney, tliat the claims of all and cvervof the said creditors who shall have sijrned this ^_ indenture shall revive to their lull extent, liiit they, the said creililors, so sii,„l and obli.ielhrmx.lrr, ^^ III .^,ir/, cue in mrvic unullicr h„l,-i,l,ir,' i si:iiil,n- lu the. prusviit one in a// ;r.v/>/c/.s- under I llie proMsi„|,s of the Insolvent ActoflSTfi "of the Dominion of Canada "—//t-A/, dis- missim.' the contestation, that there was no novation, and that the creditors were entil led I.!. W h( i(. adonorofan inimovealile re.«ervetl ft lile ren- (o himseK, and afterwards consented to a sale of the property, ami (o (;,kn tl,,. iiileiwl 1 1 (he purcliase nioiiev instead of the 532 II. A writing signed hv a lessor, and not "'•^•■I'tpl iv the lessee, promising inl a , w ':"seshouidl«MMileredinV,afl..r,M.er,an I : 'l"l>m constitute a new contract of lease wl'; "'"'.'' ■'',pl"'"i'''l 1.1 delense to a,, a,.(i , res.ind (he original lease. L.run.ur Tt'i h>. Hilt where iIktc was a settlement hy mtes with a discount of 10 jMM- cent., the noi,.^ Iiemg coiiMdered as cash, and the note, v , "-'paid-ZAAMhatthecreddpri, I le .- , | did not renve s7;,//-.n/.V J/n>,lrr..„n &^],^ I'll,/, 2 L. N . :m, S. C. 1M7;). " l(i. A composiiion in ms.dvencv is noi ., novation of ,|,e dehts suhject to ii,' and, if,,', l"'"l."«.d.hts revive m lull. J,W/,n>d& .SV„ "";"/■ A- Smi//,, 2 L. N. .•(24, S. C. IST'J " led'Jn,;^ l"-';,"ii^-'"'y note given as an'acknow- (.Ignien ol a loan does ,njt con-tiluie nov,i- imii and alter the matu.'ity of ,he note the l*iiderhasar,dit,,fthenotehen,.lpaid,to ik' on (he loan, even if (he no(e h.. pre'crihe I Xir. SfllROU.tTIOX. IX. Where the promoters of a company paid e aun resting on property which thev an' cJ.xmI ,.rthe purposes of (he company, and "liK'li they (ransferred to the cm, .'.nv', after isoiga,„..a,ion, hut without special n.entioi.nf ih ; :'',','i' "V I ""i"""" ^"P""'--'^'/./, that no Hituogition ook),lace so as to give the com- puny ihe r.ght to rank for the amount on tho 1.. And.ve,,,/,/,., that u tacit siihi-ci -an '""'"' /I'V '"i"l<'i-ad. which .i-es.s mns discharges (he privilege wili. ,.,.ctto ireg;:;:;i'"r''""''''''^''''^^'^^"''''^'''- Xlir. With aTi-um. ^0 The plaintiif having a .iudgment against '■''•'•n.l^uit told Inn, that he would wai,i,,,(il " nvt o May is,:., ,„, the pay„,ent of the ■l';'^"l ''I"'l ,I'<'I">-P tl,esai,l date caused an atta.dinient to he placed in (he |,an,|s of (he ■n.msier ol pnhlic works. The minister of Pil'iowo,-ks ileehu-edlhatheowcl to the ,le- l< iidant a halanee on a contract hv the (!ove,-i,- MM'iil With the defendant H,r .■ertain pnhlic "oilvs. On ojiposition hy the defeialant ajiu ution. Iieniier& Carrier, I liy H lessor, mill not > proiin-'mi,' lliiii, a ||,.^^ MlliMllt.Ta ccl'lllili illitr, ■ I'lintnicl ul'lciiic wliicl,' I'li'iisf to nil a(;ii,,i| ,„ »"•'. Loraiii/cr v. r/c . II. ISTH. ' "iiH a spttlpinciK l,v I 10 [XT cent., tlic i„,i,vh "ll, lUlcl tllf IllllCS (V(.|-,. i:r!'(li( |,|-icc ofilic ;r,„,JH '/A- llri„l,rs,in it /A,/-. iHTl). 1 irjsiilvciicv is |]c)i a iilijcct I,, it,' and, if II, ,t I'llli. Jl'o//„„dil. Sr„. iH S. C. IST'J. •' c >.'ivcn as an acknow- ■^ nut I'oTi-liiiitc tiova- iiirity di' till' ncile tlic nulflu' iii>l paiil, to sue If n.ilc lie |iiTM;ril,c,|. i 5 Q. L. II. 2;i.s, s, C. lip Polp operation of Inw, wliopaysa il.'btoftlio ■ ono consort iilonc lins ' lllOniMS t- nt" to the sale . < ?^''«""""' of ^nflicent. What wa 'he ;ie b It ,I,'''P'''""''^ iH'n of the indizmenf. ' ,, p"^, "J'" "'e execu- i;-ntheexe;!,:;S:::^',i,;S4"ur;i'''ri * 1 Uig. 902-63. 5r OITOSITION. OPl'OSITION. 556 Muirin M. Daly, and IMy, ' oppooant, <;ivi' ° "■' '■■-'• ' "'iC IllW, llUt f)ol <1 iniitioii to - I'oiuh claim in the property neized. I'liilinn v. hin^u,, k (imliam, 2 L. N. 38, & 2,S L. (J. J . 32, 8. C 187«. III. AkI.V DK DlliTRAtRK. 25. Grounds oj . — An opposition to a seizure of iMipvoalileM loiiiidoil on a donation neither re- gJHtered nur of wiiicli there had lieen aiiv di-- liverv or tradition wuh (h.-iniiu-ed. C'nis.si'ii v O'll'iini &, McGix, 21 L. U. J. 103, S. C. Ici77; 8U« C. C. 2G, A person wlio had been appointol vohm- tar.v guardian of thiiigN seized under a nai.iie jf(/,i/(//c, afttrwanls, when thethingM were to he 80. il, tiled ojiposition, Oil the ground tliat he luiil purchased tliein at a previous judicial sale heid on the very day on wliich the second seizure took placi — JJild, that heiiig aware of the seiz- ure lie slioiild iiave come in hv intervention. J'oiiin- V. I'hufe k Calvi, 21' L. C. J. lO.'l. S. C.1S77. 27. And /((■/(/, also, tliat he bIioiiM iiave tiled liecojiy o\\.W' pt(n:i.s-v(iiial,on which he relied, with 111' op|iosition, and iiul liaving done so he could not allerwards produce it. lb. IV. Jiv ASSKJXKE. 2.'<. An op|)osition by an assignee under the Insolvent Act of 1^76 to a sale ol etlects seized in execution prior to tiie ussignnient in insol- veiii'V — //(/(/, liiid.no notice iiavmg been given lu plaintill 111 confoniiity with sec;. !I7. (j'ai/Knit k Sunt (jit.s Co. k J-'iilliJii, 2 Jj. N. lllii S. C. 1M7'.». 21). The opposant, who had been duly ajc poiuted assignee to the deli'iidanl's estate, iiiiide a tiir(!e opposition asking that a judgment mum- tainiiig a .vk/'.mV urifl tie set aside. The .\ui.fii; arret was served on tlie delendaiit and the tiurx saisi before the writ of iitiathniciit, but thejn.lg- | nient validating the aaisie tirrel was noi reii- i dered until sometime alterwarcls—ZA/i/, main- { taining the opposition and ordering the tii-r^ I S((/.v/ tun BK;FoitK Skcond Ukoivimt. .'11. Wiiere an opposition afin de di.itrairc wan dismis.scd on motion— //t.7(/, tliat tiie opposant could not tile u new opposition until the co-tH of the lirst were paid. Pat/on v. thiniu k Doran, 1 L. N. 220, k 22 L. C. J. 103, Ji « |{ L 372, S. C. U. 1K7H. Vlir. Kn sofs Ordki-;. .32. The res(Knident, after the sale of an im- moveable as be |..nging to one li., opposed, claim- iiig the proceeds on the ground that the iinni .vc- able belonged to him and not to ]!.,u|)on win -h appelliinl op|K)sed in .lau.s iinln:, claiming i.i he collocateil lor a hyiiuthcc winch he liaif iii,,,, the same properly. The court of first in^liinue dismissed his opposition, on thegrouml llnii |i,e iiisolvein'v of the dehior was neither allegcl ii„r provol. lint /letd, in appeal, tliat the opposiij,,,, was not governed by A.-i. 7.V! ol the Cod,. ,,r I'rocediiie,* Inn by ,\rt. 72',),hind the jiid cut was coii-ecpicntly reverscl. Rouleau k "Trnn- bi'iy, 111 H. L. 2:;:), y. u. i.sso. 3.!. Where a mortgage creilitor claimed on llie proceeds ofihf proiwrty sidii at the fidlmni lirt ol a purchaser— ///■/on — ilitd, that the oppcisiiiit who claimed to Inive a property there- in Had a light to come in liy t)pposition ai.il show It. Ctiui/iiiin V. Girouc & Giroux, 2 L. jii 69, S. C. U. 18-'J. I 1 Dig. B0i-G9. X, (iKolNDS OF. .'!'). Where an opposition was issued on the ground Inter alia of part payment of the jiiii^- meiit, and that e.xecntion had issued for inure thiin was due, tiie opposition was muintaiiinl /*/•', /„/)/„ witlnnit costs Trnddle v. Iholt.n -n L. C. .1. 171, Q. U. 1875. 3(1. riaintitlgol judgment against the delVn- dam Ibr .K'lli, iuteiest an.i costs, the anioniii of the detendant's jiromissory note. On the l.'fli of .Iniie, under a writ o"f execution, cerniin goods were seized as being in the detendaiu'* possession, and in UclohiT another writ itelii.mn issued, uiiiler which oilier etiects were seizol. ' Any cro' itor of n piTfion wlm is ontltli d tolccnllo. eiiinl, or wliois LciH^iiriaily c„li,.c.,teil u|jiii iiiui»' a eurcl, liiiK li n;;li< 1,, III.. ,1 Mili-ii|iiij.siiioii, (leiniiihiiiii! V " ''"• I'-^lii^l "I 111" I'laini ihe sinii iiccruiiiK lo i,i« ; '"'■ '"■ ' "• l'.'''l I" -'"'Il il n- 1).M lo him; lir caiiiiot, Ijiin. vcr.i'xoicis.. Hn- ri;:lii unless liis ilct/tori- IiimiIhiii Ol Ills eiiiini inrries I xeeiitioii. TM C. U. 1*. t .MUT law cos s tlioM. eliiiinioit.s must bo e.ill na ed ni I uir ixvpeetiv ■ i.ider m lioliii,! Himo rifflitof iiroiierlv Ml Ihe nmiioveii- .I'solii, aiHl hIid fttileil to sol up ih.ir iiKhtH 111 (liii. nine l,y iippo-ilion to mi ul. opposi' to wiIlKiiuw, or . iipiisiiiou to seeuie cliar^iB, hut haie (ilcd i|Ii|ioili list r puyiuoiil, niier, However, deduetiii^' sicli dchts as they iiiiu he houiiil to puv, and as liam l«.f,iiiie payahlo in ooiisi.iiii.iieo ol (lie sale of the irnmovenhle,aiid the costs iiieiiiioii(.(l in ilie )ireee(lin,r artlolo. 'I'iMC. c I' t eipposiuoiiH tor paMiieiit may he tiled with the shiiiir It hi! has lot jet mad" his return, or in tlip otiice uttlie prolhoiiutar) wliere tho reiurn i.> uiade, within six (lays Mtler tho lotuni. Alter ilils ilo ay lliey cannot be lllod wiilioiit permisnioii oil he court , and upon such cuniiii!;iiis us 11 iiuposeB. (21) C, U. 1'. )SITION. 556 657 OITOSITION. T Opposition TO ni: I'.un am. ilion nfiii de ilintrahr was ■Held, that the (ippiwant Jljpowililill until till' (;„,tj, mil. J>ii//oii V. Dnriiii it 22L. c. J. io;t, ahim,. inu:. al'ipr tiie sale of nti ini- l'Ji»ill'l!.,(,|)|)i(s(.(|,,:|i,||i,- fimiuiil ihiit the iiniii ivt- ■ iiil iiol to IJ., ii|x>n wlii-li lias (inln:, cliiiiiiiiij^ lu I,. Uvc wlncli lif liiid ii{«in lie Court of first in-^ianco ill, on ilic j;rouiiil lliai ihe r Uiw neither allef;e,| riur (_>|ii'iil, lluit tlieo|)|),,siii,in VrL T.VJ ol the Coilf uf t. "2'J,t Hiiil llie jiii|;.'ii,ciit rseil. Rouleau k Tnin- U. l.sso. :e ureiliiorchiiineij dn 11,^ .■ sold at lilt' ftille '11, /lire tiiiil as there was mi- V ol th,. |)iircliaser, ihiit sii-luineil iiM an (i|]|i,,.i. troii it, Tieinblay, 1 h, X. ir pnyineiit cannot lie iitioN of the ilela.v lixnl "lie ol J'roceiilwi| iKi.siiion, iiisulniit, I. ;r.a C. C. J'. .|lnllllt^ must bo I'./il n'.'^id liiiil nitnc right of |jro|nTty "111) failed to sel up iji.ir inn tOHii ul. opnosi'iuii 10 I'uii! clmr^'iB, but Imo'lilca r, iiuwi'ver, deduttl»«M It'll D iiiiv, mid a* ham Ux.mt ^iili'iifllie iinnioveiilik'.aml I'ciliii^. rtiticle. 'I'JHC. C. ['. lav hi' tiled with Ilic- slitrilT I mil, or ill the otllco nfilie n ir uiuile, within uix iliiya le ay they cannot bi' lllcd t ,aud upon sucti cuiidi.iiiii; S'/nrT an"/ /•'h"' ^J'T^'''''" "^ ^^^^' ""'•'" ^'n les ei'l T .,"'"' "' t"";-* oppositions were ;'','■ '" ,""•• ''''"'^1' concerns the lirsi .em ewasl,a-e,|,,,,ona.salefro,n;heii.,.tei|! ant to theoppo-ant ol the2.Sth ofAiiir„.t \m\ by whiih Ihe thi.i.s afterwards sei/ed an'j a No tl.t' l.iill <.l the crop for tliat yea,- ef ,nai e fleveial jieisons, creditors of the defendanl to the exieiit of *1 17 oO, -vhich was tl e st ,n .^te tlieoi;;,,,,) 1,.^^, ,^^.^.^_ pe,„|,„, dhout four monhs hntji,d,M,enthad,/oithe,;i,eenJi^^,^.^^^ 1 he elendant wa. examined as a Witness a, a. .1.1 led that It was concerted hetwee i, n,!" and the opposanl, to whom he owed 4i70, "t 1. should tran-ler to ho,, all iiispropertv e ' a^nlwnchan,,,i,,i,p,al,o.e,i:;r|o*;i5()o,;§l! ; orS;i ,,,. Alter he sale the delendant cea-ed to be 111. opposaiifs tenant on halves as he ha bee., betore, and hecame h,s servant a! *j^ a inonlh-thou-h noihin- showed that the lea-e had ever heen formally re.scinded. Ti on - «ant knew a I ahonl the deliMidanf- in, e le s to plaintiir. The defetidant savs t a , ^ oppo.sunt 0,1 one occasion said io 1 '' te wit te .. S:';;.",;'"'^-"^?-^.'""' !'>• ^^ aJu.,- wiintss, J' prrjtn' mejaire ,,„i„t ,„;,,if !,■ me„u:.t; allul,,,. to the sale' that h Iji,' ^en ,i,a|e; and a.,.,,,, he .aid "Laloi e fera cc ,ju d rondr,,." The whole nropert as transterte.!, not merely to the e.xten'l of In opposanfs clam,. Die contestaii hetwe, tf,e opposa,,, a,„| ,h,.,„„.,„,^,„ ,„a t „ , costs. L„iondei^ tf.«M/,..iy.„v,,v;:,;'v.'c. 8b es ,-e /ed liad heen previou.sly .sold l.vdelend ant, and the ileed of sale d,ily re.nstm ' op|>os.t,on was nuiintained will, co-ts , :i, glaiMtiti: y.'«6.7v./W/u,22L.aj.';^|;:"s' 38 An opposition ha.sed on part i.avment 'Vll be maintained w„h costs, no, with, ta^i, nodejKM was made of the ainomi, ,-e, i, t 3'J An opposition will not lie for the valm 5iiL'!''^lr!";!"'i.'"T" - .". ...ai-antee. OPPOSITION. 558 opposanf eonteiided that the eoiit,..t.,,- ;;- bueow,,,, to t,he op loiti :';';;::• i::;?:; ;!::::'Hr:;:dit;;1:n^;ti--:';-;r-^ , p rule, as It, s„„ly ,„.,„„) ,;^^„ (^ ; , ; bpanlo. the ti-ans/er^y/,/,/,,,,, ,,,,;;;! "iiiit ,1, tins respect is nnas.sail'il,',. Ti ;'l>l--an,,ur,herc.^ite„ded,ha t e iiditiyr 'be donation could only b-> tested hv," ^;. action. The c,,u,.i.,,, [;.,:: ;,,!;>, ™- a^.liii-t the opi,o-a„t. I was so h.,.i lo 1 . ;;;;;;;■ -.^1. as to e,iah,;Vi;:'co,:nt,^^i::::^- liPlneen the parties as fullv -is i„ ,' ■'" "*-^ p-eiy,,, ,,r.'.revocato;';^ ;::.,;: :-;;- I iicre was no mpi.tice m coii.irmm.r ,1 ■ ','"•'". as the preten.le,! di'ei 1 ';.'';' •""'-" '.■aiidiilentanilshoi.1,1 1* .set „ ,1 "7,": ''"1 •»2. A,,peal was had Iron, a ju.hMiient , iri ,.nJ Appellant had ohtained a iud.'miM, i n'siio,„le,„ inPM l.,.l,, ' .l""r,,.iii It a.'ainst ,40. An opjiosition afiii de. dhlraire to a eizuieot moveables .,U\ in the p„s e.^siou 01 ".P party CoiMemned will he d ..ms.e o^ molHm, ,l,heall,.^aiionsiailt,,set!u a,,; ,«°' he tale, and do not set n,, a po-sessh ■in'u', opp-isants JMnundHul. v.' /M,./o. & ) „ ; 41. Pla,n„irto,d< ine.xoc,ition,and inorder to ii tt'i'-'r;"'-."' " ""^"''>' '■■ bminalio," ag,nn-t the delendant, a piece of laii,|. The 00- posant daniHiier of the'defendaiii and livi, - with h,,,,, elainied the land as he ifo ,em undpra .lonation from l.,,,, to her o d te 5th Aii«iis., I67ti. Tne plaintiir con est I tl opiKisition, a,,d dcnan'ded the n„l , y o f 1 . donation, on the ground of fraud a,4lo!t e vreditors 01 the donor. The contestation ws maintuiucd by the court at Iherv.l e T It .vs|,o,„|e„t lora balance of princtpaland inier psi due under an olilij-ation. ' K^eei 1, , , • "^ ;;-'■•■?-!; '-t-iMiipposit!;^':,;; ,1-3 "" !"• bad not received cedii lor certan ' oipnlson account made hv him heloV. ' ■^" ^i.Pil, and that he had heen u,iallet,V,'v,l"'"' p'.y.n'-.'.^ own. to an err.,r ..-t '"-;'" badoulv recenilv discovered \i,S, ."'"^^b he aiii hisoppositioiMvasniaintained o.h, evS and a de.hictioi, ot tins sum made T; , ^ ^'^"f- l;'..t,.r.edthatdelii,-| . '' ' ' -",'.»' miy alives„f tl,«creitii„r^ I'u .c-iT vK n ..''Pieioiit- si .1 ■ m r)5u OITOSITION. OPPOSITION. 5r,o Hi. Heal pstftio vvii- soizcil u^ l.cinj; in po.'si's- Hi(Jti (it llic viiciirit CHtiitc III' M., ,|im;i'ii>('.|. 'I'lic n|l|ll'illllll, .-IStCIOriU'ClVlS.'.l. ll|l|M.-cl FlIlillL' lip tillc and |ii)8>(-si(iii under lillf— //« /r/, tlmt wliiTc a lillt" w:i- liml in Ihw aixl ni latcd and I'raiidiilcnl, and where the |iiiirliarii|irielor ainl lo lie the reputed iKis^e.-sor (»/(/;»« '/..;»/;(/. -lie e.oiild nut iimiiilain an (i|>|Mi'-ltiuii lonnded on the prelen- fion that the ,-eiziirp on the cniator to the vaeiinl cFlate was Kiijicr nnii iliiiii/nn : renounced to the commiiniiv to which tiieproperlv helon^red, shehaviii;.' heeii in ooinmuniiy with her hnshand at the lime .she purchased the properlv iVom her lirolher, whe had divested hersc It cif anv title or interest in the (i.'opcrty, and could not "claim the le;;al po.s- He.ssi.iii under the deed of purchase or \i\ pre- Hcripliun, or inainlain an opposition hecaiise the Heiziire was .iiiprr ikhi iluiniiio mid nnii imssi. (kii/e II,. ;) S. ('. Kep. l!:t:!, Sii. ("t. l,KTi». 4y. The plainliir, a workman, sei/ed tiio pro- perly o( his employer, a suh-conlraelor, lor his Wftires. The iirincipal contractor intervened and ohiaincd a judL'e'.-i order to ^let possession of the lhinj;s seized on jjivinj: seciirilv. This wa.s done, and jmljiment hiniii;; Lieeii rendered against the delendiinl a writ ol rcinlili'iiii cj- poilii.1 was issued, ami the inlervemint who had ohtained l>osse.ssioii of the thmj.'s ihould have heen dismissed. J'reros/ ,\c J,'o,/,/,rs, 24 I.. C. .1. 17^, g. li. |S71». 4'.». \ seconil opposition which is not founded on reasons suhseipieiit to the first will lie dis- missed on motion. Dcamai-lcdii v. I'epiii 2 h. N. l.Ti. \- 2.! L. C. .1. (il, .V lU K. J.. .54;! S. C. IHJ'J ; (1(11 C. C. i'. & (j. ;i.t Vic. cap. 4.t uO. Review from a judj,'inenl whicli main- tained an oppo.sition a fin lU di.ilrain; hy which tlie o|iposants claimed the property seized as projinelors umler a donation made'liy the late 1.. B. and his wile, the del'endant, and also liv the will of the .said late I., H, l,y duiialioii, the donors reservin;; to themselves and to liie sur- vivor t hi' iisul met of the whole of their properlv, real and personal, ^^ave to the oppo.sanl, except what mij^ht lie iieces-ary to piiy the debts of the • 1 lie seizure ul' imiiidveftlilos can only be made against tliejuilnnieiii ilebtur anil I. e must im or bo repiileil lobe III iMiSM!,-.s ibr rea.soiH wib,-iiiii..nt to ilio proceeiliiijjs by which the sale wa.< .>^io|i|iim in tliu lirat insiaiice and uiion a iudBo'B order. tiiA <: c. V. • ■> r, AH. i;,n „[ iliH >Bid Code (of Procedure) shall apply to executious agaiuat lUi vuabies. y. 34 Vlo. cap. 4, sec. 8. donors, who, or the nnrvivor of whom.wiw to huv.. the ri;;ht of Mclhu^r f,„. t|„i, ,,„rp,i-e The terms or the will were ,„ii/,ili.s miiliiii. th, ihf same us the donation. 'I'he plainlill' was a creditor of the donors, and held on the reiil eslale ol ih,. doimrH u morlL'a;,'e executed on iii%m ' .? :''"^'"'l'«'>-'l-'i;'.l.'rthe sum „f M>.lMI, lor llie halance of wh.cn he olituined the jnd;,'ment under winch tne propi'rlv in oiiestion wiis .seized. 'J he plainlilf contended Ihat the reserve in the donaiioii .md will e.xdnded llie properlv seized. Thai in realily the donalmn an.l w-ill conveyed only il„. properlv which should reniiiin after ihe pavmeni ..f llie debts And until this had heen e-tahli-hed hv ihesule ol sulhceni properly to pav the plaininl t|,„ o|iposant could mil claim ihe properlv or any ||'i'tol It The return of ihe sherilf was llm, Ihe dWendant was in pos-e,-ion wi.en he seized and not ihe o|iposai,l — //,/,/, thai iheie was no ilonl.i I i„t the donors miended that the plaintiir '-lioiild he paid helore iheoppo-anls enjoyed the I'loporty, and that the plainiiirmijthtciie'a.raitist UK-opposanisihenia.xim ,/i.„,nr ,t r,:l.:,7ir „t e'liit- .liidj;ineiit to ina.nlam the contestaliun and dismiss the opposiimn. IV,/,; C. C, 7h2 ' Mchriizic \. L,irii/iir,S. C. li. JSHO. ol. A .w^,/e ,/,,,),.,■/,, HMied a-ains't lefendunt, 1-ib.t. Uelendanl aliandoned the premises, unj .inl.u'inent was rendered aiiain-l him. In Ixrj llie plaintiir issued e.veciilion under the il|,jl^' ';i'''it. The haihir went to the domicile ol the deleiidani, and asked him if lie hail any move- ahles. Hosaid lie had none, and sij-ned a reliirh ot nulla Ooiia. I'lainlill men caused the iin- moveahles of defendant to he seized. Defeii. dam oppose,!, u„ the ground thai the eileol^ seized under the. sv/,Wc,/„7,-,7V ha I never heen .soM. OppiLsiiion disinis-ed on ihegroun.j tlmt deleiidant ha.l si>;ned the reliirn of /,»//,, /,„„„. Oniliuiu ii JliirtOeii, lu K. L. 22rf, S U li Iw.so. 62. The respondent iia I cause,! an execution to be i.ssued against the immoveables of aiipel- lant personally, and he opposed the Heiziii'e a,i tiitortohisson,aniinor, Ins wife being decea.seii. i liegroundK of the opposition were that the iiii- nioveahie .seized as belonging to himself person- ally lornied part of the commuiiitv which had e.xi.sled hetiveen him and his ,lccea"sed will', unJ also on the ground that wnen the seizure was made a writ of allachinei.t under the In.solvent Act ol 187J had issued aga;nsi jimi, and he was no longer in ix),s..^ession of the immoveahle- JJeld, thatopposant had no interest, and that as the writ of attachment in iiisolvencv was beiiii! contested at the time of the issue of the execu- tion, and was fiince set aside ; an.l as, moreover the wile wa,s still alive at the lime ot Ihe sei zure, that the oppo.sition was groundless and wa'' nroperly dismis-ed. LifcOvre & Tuiycon, :! L. .S. 20, y. IS. 1«80. •' II may 1)0 stipulated that a gift infer rims shall be su8|iondeil, rcvokcit or leiluccd under condniins ivliicli do not depeiiu auleiy upon tne will ol the donor, iltlie do or rt-seno to biinself tne ri^r|,t |o ,|,spo.* of or to lake back at pieasiire some object mckided in the ailt or a sun. ol money out of iiie property given, tlio irif' I'olds Kood or the rema.inb.r, bu! is von! il.^ la .),.. part rs- served, winch continuui to belong to the donor, except In gills by ooiUTtct of uiarriage. 782 C. IJ. iirvivor (if ulioiii.wftH |<, »)l I'll- llmt |inr|ni«t'. '|'|„. re miiliili.H iiniliitifli.i, t|„, II. Till' plitinlill »ni., a, I. ami lit'lil oil |||(. rual I lllcirlL'U;^!' «'XC(;illl'i| .11, Ikt, iMi.i. li.r III.' Hiiiii of ol wh.cM lie iilituint'd (lie iiic |ini|,' till' }.r..|H.riv wliicli <■ im.viiifiit ..r llif,li'l,ts. II c.-tiilpli-lic'd |py llic Miile u |iiiv liif )j|iiiiili|| tilt' tun llic |ii(i|iMily ur liny I 111 ilic Hhcnir rtiiM timi "--(■.--liill WIICIl ll,. >t.i/,,.||, -III III, I lull iliiTt' was 110 iii'ihifii thill (lie iiiuiiiiiir "■"l'l'"-'llltl .■Iij,,y,.,| tin, iiiiiiniriiii>:lil oilc iij!aiiist III iliiiiiifr ll iiiriiii- iif, ii.iiliiiii tilt' ciiiitcstiiiiuii iii'Mi, \'i,le C. C. 7ti2 • . (;. it. IsHO. ■-nt'l ii^iiiii-'l Ifli'ii.lant, luncil llic |iri'iiiisi's, aiiii ii,i;iiiii-t liiiii. Ill |h7<)| 'Olllloll lllliIlT llu'juiljv ■ ti) llu' .JiiiiiicilL' III' the III it' 111' liud liny iiiove- Jiir, iiml sijriH'il a ri'Uirri 1 llii'ii ciiii-t'd the j|,|. tu Ik- sci/i'd. Di'lWi- l'"lllld llllll IIk! ,.|I,.et(l {iii/i-rii: hill iii'ver liccii •»('i| on ilK';:n)nii,| that ' rctiini III' iiii/ln liiina It. h. tlS, .S. C. [{. 5fil OPPO.^^ITIO.V, XI. In F()k.wa P.ui-Kum. 5.r A |>laiiiliir»li„lm„„l,tai„,.d l.-ave to «i,o 8i.lli..ri.,ii,.,i, ,„ ,„„„.„ ,„ /•„„«,,„..,/'» IHHO '""'" A- /%.mi.s.s. •'**' """" "'"<"'i->"issnMo.,poslti<,n(oa ''""''■"'"'"' '•'""""■^- "-I til- LT I tl.at it had I iippos iHsiifd witli.Mii ,1 i,id.r,.\,,r,|,.,. //,,,' ,, ,- om.oHi:.,n c.,„id^,ni;i„'d.JI ';„;:,:;;: XV. I'liocKiHiu: ON. K-;ii;:,r:,;s;;;:t;;;,Si':!:i ST'c.";;';;- ''"■''■■'«''•'■""'•■"'. I «i'h" XVF. To JllMJMKXT. -nent^ -r call, diu' m 'itn L " .elTl"'" in..a,,dca,.s.danox.cu.i..nt;rs:.'':;ii|^ j line It 'If ' l) ''"''''" "ir^'l'^" <" tl... art I ' '■" '"■ ^'■■^"""J ''"'t the con- aau siihscnption hy her son wa.s null, ,u | M It heen coiit.s,,d tho action «onhl proha ' mako-M.V/'. ' "'"'■•'''e''H'l no statii.s to r.W V / '' "l'l"-iMun. Stadacona Ins,,,- « C. R l^Tfr^""" '^ ^''*"^'''"> 5 y- J^' «• ^^1, hi'rt.S,,';;"""?- "i:!;;;;'",!'' ■';r"^'"' pf-'^iinp ,viii,o„, «epar«t,' Tto ?n, '. " '" I'.'.'VT*'' = "»""» hI.o'wHou ,,„,„,,.„ ,,,•,, TlK'oi.poynntsan' tiiort- Mi):u'H of till' property .s,,|,( |,v the -henil in lH'.'r,m..d. ofnullitv .et o„( a niinilK r of ;-i'"n.ialiiU'. which I -will notatpr ! ,f, , U-aii..e the ri.l.t ol the credil!,r to p l! alter ih, sai^ ,„ ,|,,„ ,„aiii,er and lor i i» ;;"" <-l."l hy the n.lj„.liri„„h-,. Th w s njeued n« i,k, late. On the merit., „ ,„i„ t ---^ihly have prevailed; for thon.V one VH" cited at the l,ar, ther,. is p,.,,? .,, "J i*.h ai.lhonty (or .-ayin^Mhat th^.,., , /,, A/. p,<. was Kood. ( ,.,.:.., to Ih,. ca I. Jl fill, (' i{ . I.. '"'"""II', (tiijtuliiittiiire .^.;^;/ !/;,;, ^i;!n,f,;;,,::;:Voi::i;:,:^ . ;;ri:;:ra:rS;;;;;::i-;;-c:vis^ .ecision ,11 ls.-„l. „a,, .Smiii. an,! M'.n.M't! . .).. un,i the reason ^-iven ,va. ll,;„ ,h,, ,„lja,U. ."'""•c was n,>l parly to the //i.s7„„ v, and ll re- ■MVC.Mihi n,.t legally l,,.hr.H,,Oitint: I :,^^^^ •'.v ll mere nolic,.. .Vow. article 711 V V V ;Zn:;:d.^T£S'Ti::;''rt'' ''"•'-^'- -.0 the nJ":r'l;'!;;..t:!;; :;;■':;; •;;r^r My«Y,.,. where the ji, |^,,.s up,, ar lo |, re: ;i in^..na,.,,.naMdawn,. (ii'iil ,,!:;:;:..,,; I. creilii ,r her,' oppos.n- ,',in l„ |„ „„ |,h„ ' l"Mt,ni hai, the plainftr was lli,,... m tl e i::r;/;r,i'™;":,;:;^^;;„;,:i:;;'rr .|||'llrrl^lu,r^n^ llH.y ,vere called , I... ^e •l.elher ihey c.n.e.Me,!. Theref.,,,., | ,' j X iliH opposition IS ,.,',-.,||y a .U.,n„i„l,. ,-, Ll "^ '''■'■'"; ";,i'l I'liisl he t,eale,| as s,„.|, \ ' 'rli sepanit,' „« 'to' p "r VJT'-^'' '' "»""" "''e wlw-.i mmts 'im.'l';' I'lTnL'.'J "":• "l'I"«!ti,)n the opnonant XVIII. To Vkndhioxi Exponas. j;0. An opposition to« neiznre nmlfr a writ of »'///"/«, «/„„„„ cannot he maii„a,ne,l „ss a e, oi, something winch has oecn, | i .^e the tirst oppoHition was lih-d, even whei tl r« i« an onler of .s,n:s;\- .si,me,l 1,; a j d"! / ' til. On a motion to ,lismis,s an opposition to a writ .11 i-<;,ilili'i„l e.vn„„n>s~Il,l,l i . t.eopp,tioiil.ad,s,u/dwmK,nut ;' a^ tliere wa.s nothing to show'' th.^t all the • I Dig. 10,51.1024. "ntlio,il,.l,v,'<.h„ra,.|,.ro i , im I f '';'"",n-.,t,,>„ „rat i 1 J, tfM i| 4 M 1 |- ' ^ ' .t ■ , I tl 603 0I5AXn?] ASSOCIATION, nnlilu'iitidri-' mill ailvptri-PiiiPiitH r('(|nire(l \>y liiw liiiil III. I li,.,.|, iiiinle oil tlic lirsl writ iii Bironlaiuc Willi tlic (rriiiH of l| .■ CihIc oI' Civil I'ldC'lluif, Alt. (Itll/lliat lIlC 0|l|RHllil.ll WUM ri;:litl.v (l.siiii--(.,|. />, ,'/,„.//^ ,t Avmstioiui, 2 I'. N. 17:', i^ 10 U. L. ;fhJ. Ci.U. 187y. XIX. W'llKN IN CoNTKMl'T OP Uol'RT. 02. A |t'r.-()ii cmiiKit lie coiiijciiint'il to im- priM.iiiiiciii tor (oiilfiiii,! of court until ilio liicni- iif till' (ippoMtinii Imve het'ii ilcui.if.i. Vuwuon »V 0,iikii, 8 U. L. "10, Q. U. 1H77. Ol'TION. ,./;..^'"" ''•^■y'"'"''-: AND llKAKixo, see PUOCE- 11. Uk 'i'ltiAi, iiv .Iiuv, sec JURY. ORANGE ASSOCIATIONS. I. Il.l.Kd.Vl,. (i.'t. Oijinion of police magi.Mtrate on ccinmit- •tiee note top. MD mpra. OVERDRAFTS. 5(U Mie tlip ilcfcnilnnts tor trial for licloiii.'iiiif (nan illctrul HKiiit.v. mill nllciii|iliiiL' to walk in ,,ro- (■e.<.Mion, llicrcliy .■nilmi;;i.rins.' Uh' piil>li<: pfucc lifijina V. Uiiiiit, H K. L. (irhl)orinj; Kuman Catholic pari^-hes there exists a Catholic minoritv Hjwak- iDf,' a i-io^'uajre ,|,ilerent (n,m that of "the ma- jority, iiich minority or a portion of Mich minor- ity may be erected into a distinct parinli (brail temporal purposes of their religion, and pIuiII coiistitiite a Corporation under the name of congreiration of the Catiiulics of speaking the language. 2. The erection of such minority or portion of such minority into a separate parinh shall l« made in the manner detennine.l hy Chap. 18 of the Consolidatvd StatuteN lor I.ower Canada except that the freeholder shall be replace.l by' the heads of families helon-inj; to the national- itycfsuch minority; excepting, liowever, the parish of Ste. Brigide of Montreal to hIucIi the provisions of tiie Act oi' this Province ;)!) Vic. Chaps. ;!5and .%, relative to the erection of certain parishes dierein menUoned, shall apply mutatis mutandis to the said pariah con- gregations. 3. The head of the familv shall .ietermine the nalioniilily to wliich his family belongs, and no change from one parish to another sh dl be ailowe I. except when approved by the .liocesan ordinary. 4. The Roman Catholic Bishop of (he Diocese in which such congregations shall (-xist may annex thereto the parishioners of a ne.ghboring parish speaking the same language who shall demand to be thus annexed. 6. The present Act shall come into force on the day of its sanctiou. PARTICULARS. I. Hii.i- or, nee KLKCTIOK LAW. PAUTITIOX. I. Ai'Tinv Koii. III. IVXI-KIITISE INACTION OF, MAY IIK Dis. rKNSKi) WITH. IV. 1''|1I1T.S AMI l{KVl:VrKS. V. IIkih.s.not C(i\|.im.:i) t.) Actiov tv to KsTAUi.isii tiikik Rioiit.s, ,ee ACTION I'kti- VI. Not \Kri;ssAiiY to Skt off a Dkmt x'v KM'.cr roij.s. ' Vil. Ui 1>uoim;rty Hkih'eatheo. VIII. Rkjiit ro. IX, Skchktion of Estatk. I. Action for. 1. A tul.ir may sue for and obiain a partition o( the proiH'rty ol the succession on llehaK of tlie minors under liim, even when there are im- moveables comprised ,n the succession. Jkmrd V. Lf /rutin: 7 K. I.. HOI, S. C. 1,S7G. 2. And in such action it is not neces.^ary to brnifrall the heirs. Jb. ■'^ .'i. And such action may be brought before the completion of an inventorv. lb. .n1i,i^')"r'"i""':'' ,""'''"' ""■ Plrtit'tiffmavotrer to the defendant the option of paving a cVrtain partare'""/7 '" ''''*""'"' P'^'^^^'^^^^S with the in. Experti.se ijt Action of, may be Dis I'EN.sEi) H rrii. 5. In an action in licitation the court may order the sale of the immoveables without ordering the ex,H.rtise in Arls. 922 and following of (he Code of Procedure, when it is in evidence hat the immoveables cannot be divided and tl;at there are not as many lots as there are 700rQ.'B"l87(5 ^"^''"'''''' '^ J^'^'oiiche, 9 II. L. G, And any irregularities in the proce.hire flubspqueiK toti.e service are covered by the silence of the parties and (heir npgleet to in- voke then, before the iiearing oa the aierits of the demand. lb. e PARTITION. lOX OF, MAY BE DrS f)C9 PARTNKn.SIIlP. IV. Fill iTH AND Kkvknikh 7. Ill II pnrlilloti b pliiinlill i« , nlillcl to cnni. IK>iiNiin.,ii ir,.n, il,e,|,.(,.,„|,,„( |-,,r ili.^ IriiitN aiirp, whh entitlcil to a ihinl Mmrp in an inininveuhlc hc iin>:in^' lo tli,. in|.iirtil.> cciiiiniinitv, nml that llic liiirrliiis,.r(,| Hiali nlinre, lli.. .IhiiVIiI.t U'lri" Olat.'c.c(nililil,TiiBii(lnpHrtili(>ii(i('||i(. proi.orlv" traumur & MUhand, 21 L. C. J.288,Q. \i. PAKTNEnSFITP. r.To n. Action nv Partnkk ahkr Dikmoi.itiov. I.'l. Tlic pliiintiir lirotijilit nptidii tWr n .lil.t ■InetoaflnnoCxvliirlil,,. l„i,| (,<,,,„ „ p„rln..r. iiy the iltTil o(

  1. .Miliitlon it wiiH ii.'rc.d Hint '•'••.iMiHncHN „(■((„. (Irni HJimilil I,,, rrtirml „„ l.y I'laintid an,| nnotluT, wli„ lia.l Hiri.c .li.,|, nn",! uli..^,. riKlitM were roprcHcitcl i,v plHinlitl- llfKI, llial It was :iot ncceHi-arv llm't llie ,|,.,.,| of |liHHol,.linn H|.„„|,i be H;;nifiV,l i„ ilnWiilants '.■lo.-e Mill. Mill. ik...,l of ili.Hointiun ami trann. liT not lallinawilliiii lli,. ,.ul..^„rv ..f lian-lcr!. or HaleH of ,l,.|.tH „r riMl.lh of motion. «|il.h -MiM U- Hjrnil,,., |„.|i,r,. aclicr, l,r„„;rl.l npun-t tiinlpari... T„ie y . T„n„„ce el ul., IL. S. IX. Skchktion of Estate. 10. Wliere it if- proved that (Ik-ip has hern 8Pcr.. 1, n the Mivcntoiy anri the partition will lie annn l^t| ;'a.iMary |H|i7, and praying: li.r an ucconnt, .,r 111 .Man t, tor a jiid^-nient a^-ainnl dclendi.nt of *400and intercut. Delendant dcnie.l the e.\iM- tenceol a partnership. Plainlitl tiled aitidcH ol c...parliierKhip and of it- dis-chiliun. An eumiHe was held, and delendant adni.lud that '•■j-a.l retained all the assi^tn of thecnc'i. but asserled that plaintilf never was a niirlner cniKlen PARTNERSHIP. I. Action against, nee ACTIOX. II. Action dy 1'artnkr after Dissoi.rTiov Jll. Action FOR Accoint av, see ACTION EN Kkhdition. ATTinVr"'"''' ^■'"' Non-Recistration OF, ^ee Al, JJON gri TAM. V. HuKAdi OF Agreement of. VI. CoM.MEKCIAl,. VII. I)E.-ici(ii«TioN ofPartxkrs. VIII. LlAlllLITY AFTER CuANOE OF PARTNERS. I. Action against. II. Where persons are sued as partners, and a cause of action is only establishe,! against one individually the action will liedi^niis^ed (« ioto tUMnr V. Fovhes, 22 L. C. J. 2t, S. C. 1869 " 12. A firiii orijiiimlly composed of two part- ners admitted a third. The change was not re- gistereii, and the firm was sued as if composed oftlie/ir.st two partners only. Service was majle nt the place ol business of the ni^w firm— MM, that the jilaintifls were entitled to amend tlie wn; hy inserting the nam. of the new part- ners, and an exception to the form Pttackintrthe service of such amended writ becau.se made after the c.ngn,al lefurn day wa. di^uiis^eii. Easlmi Totni.hips Bank & Morrill, 1 L. N. ov, y. D. 1877. Account ordered and judgment cnmiemiiin.' delendaii to pay ov< r to phiintitf whatever liaH ance might he loiind due him on siieh account. Delendant in course of time filed an account accompanied by his own affidavit ami an affi- davit ct the professional accoiiiitaiit bv whom he a.c. 20. And, al.so, that being described as " co- partners " and not " heretofore co-partners " was sufficient, lb. 21. \Vl ere, by the deed of dissolution of a partnership, power was given to one of the partners to sign notes in the name of the firm ami one of the other partne ^ being sued on a note signed under such authority pleaded that the note was given without his' knowledge in tlie name of a terminated co-part riership_//e/,7 confirming the judgment of the court l«.|ow,' that the del-endant was liable. White et al. v. Wells, I L. N. 87, S. C. R. 1878. PAWNBROKERS-fi-ee PLEDGE, r. LiEx OF FOR Advances. II. LlAHILlTV (M\ III. Who are. I. LiE.v OF FOR Advances. « '5:, .7''".! '^P«'!' broker advanced money on a watch in the hands of an eu.ployee who had been entrusted with it to repair it- //.A/, that le was entitled to be paid the amount advance More the owner could recover. lieawlni & II. LlAHII.ITy OF, 2;{. The plaintifif pawned a walcli with ,lefen- dan , an,l delendant not being aiile to produce it sued h„„ ,0,. the value. Deten,lani pleaded that the watch with other articles to a consider- able value ijad been stolen. Tiie robbery with out any fault or negligence was proved— //tW that the theft under ^uch circumstances ^o;': .stituted a msJorhUt, such as to relieve the de- fendant from hahihty. Soulier v. Luzanis, 21 1200c c "■ ^^**^^' "*"' ^'^^'^' '^^^* III. Who ARE. . 24. I amtif sued for a penalty alleged to be incurred by delen.lant for illegally e.xercising he trade of a pawnbroker on 28th October! 187 ., by receiving and taking by way of pawn, pledge and e.xchange, from one M T. B., a gold watch. By a first plea the defendant denied tliat lie ha?ee PRO- ONS. A.GE. iVITUDES, Rioni op GEES. iRRIEliS, LiAuii.iTv UTY. lATioN OF, see AC- -See PLEDGE. ■CBS. ES. r ailvanced money on n einployee wlio liad repair it— //,,-/,/, (|,at the anion I) f advanceil •ecover. Jienitiln/ & N. 407, C. 0.1879; a watcli witli defen- ns able to proiluce it Delendai't pleailej articles to acoiisiiler- • The robliery with ! was proved— //e/(/, circmnstanceH coi>- as to relieve tlie de- itlier V. LdzavHs, 21 \ra, 1072, 1150 & pnalty alleged to be illegally exercising • on 28tli October, ng bv way of pawn, one E. T. B.,a gold le deleixlant denied fade; that the trans, was reoojiniziil by ^ing said watch he nl mnvpablp by a person )ii of lawful title. Any mst jtfuvr be:;idr.i his 'Kslon or in the tUlc of tioii. or who nniliT th* exempt from ilolugso. 573 PAYJIENT. PAYMEXT. did not exercise the trade of a pawnbroker. He also pleaiie.i a Heooriii,n de ptiiemenl. ' Roij v Dion, 4 Q. L. R. 245, S. C, K. 1878. "^ 2t). An action on a delegation of payment isa suHicient acceptance, and no formal accentance Bom-he,; y R. L. 547, S. C. K. 187:» nvfy, ^\ '*?7I'"*"^e Kv the iiypolhecary creditor „t a delegation of payment containrd in the deed of sale of the hyp„tl,ecat<.| immove- able is a mailer of consent merely behveeii the creditor and the purchaser, and mav be proved by showing that both purchaser and .■'editor a.knowledged and accepted the relalin,, of debtor and cmhtor. Trnst & Loan Co. v. (juertni, d h. X. ;iS2, S. C. H. 1880. IV. Demand ok, see Dekault. 31. Where a ,lebt is payable at the debtor'.^, 'lomicile he cannot when sued f ,r the debt Hiiiply ask the disiiiis.sal of the action on the ground that no previous demand of |,avii,eiit wa,s made at his .lotnici lo. Mallei le v.' llndon, ■4-2 I-. 0. .1. 101, S. C. 1877. .'52. A ,iebtor who wisiies to avail himself of the plea of war , demand of ),avment pri,.,- to action must .:it the amount in court. Smdlwood y. Adaii-e, 21 L. C. J. loo, s. C. :J.i. Where want of demand of payment is leaded, it must be accompanied wit), deposit of he amount m court in ordei to avail as a de- fence. MalleUe v. Iludon, 21 L. C. J. 191), S. C. 34 In an action on a promissory ,n,U-—/reld, that the demand (d pavnient made by any one without showing the note, oreveii havin.'' it in ^^tT20f::'"?^T;8^!:''-''""^^-^"''^-''-"^ .i5. Plaiiilitf purchased a note made by defen- dant immediately alter its maturity. The note was payable generally, x^-iye months lUiei- wwds he sued on it. Delendant pleaded want of presentation, an.l proved that at the time of hs maturity lie liiul the money to pay tor it— J/eld, that under art. 1152 ol'ihe ( ivil Code • I'lc; plamtitl-. 111 order to be entitled to the costs ol the action, should have presented the note for payment at the domicile of the defendant '"'",'■""//, '''■ J^'Ooie, 9 K. L. ;i82, C. C. 1877 .«. \ here a debt is payable at the otiice of he debtor, and he issued without any demand being first made there for payment, he may de- posit he amount in court, and in such case will be relieved from cost., Crbassa v. Vie dit (^hnnuideierdetiud Rsl,S K. L. 722, C. C. 37. Payment ofrent must be demanded before 9?-Y'< /'"','C-,i- ^^''!l"iens v. lieanlnme, 1 L. N. *.o4, o. L. 18(1). 38. A demand of payment of taxes addressed to a wile separate as to property, and by her sent in an envelope a.idi-essed to lier husband, ia sufficient. Corpovathm o/Jiienville v. Gilles- pie, C Q. L. K. :i40, C. C. 1880. . * Pnvmeiit must be made is the place exnreifeiJIv oi- .mil lejly .mlic^fert hy the obli,atioV,. If n,f Kf ."^ °o thln«, m.mt be made ni the |,l«ce whore tlie o.'u.wm at the time ol cont,«ctlng the obliKRtlo. I a |,'l?,^ casrs pavmeiit „„,„ be made at the dom "ilo , f Urn debl.r Kubjecl nevertheless to An, n.lo.« preii ,^l Lde? tlio titles relating to particular coutructs. lioa c c ,.- 1 H 1. -i ■ r mi^ i 67B PAYMENT. ^.^„'i I "''■'^''"l'>"t in an action on a noto pa. a, I,, on denmn,!. but of which no.lenmnd no P n' '"/''■\ '''"PO-'^i'ed the amount of the '° '' ' "'; ""V" "'^ «'-"""'i or want of present. ZrlVu ' ''";';"'I"-'-"' 'va. >lisn,isse,i. hut on the nm,le the .Jelen^lant was not in default at the t n e oi a<.t,on brought, and the plaintiff should V. iMlTTATtON- OP. res?;,,*)'''"'""'"'^' «cting as a broker, sold for the btn ' Tl ''''"'"""-^ of wheat to S. at f 1.25 per bush I. This was on the 13th July, 1«74. fhe appell.u on the 15th July render.! to S an delivere l' m1''" '"".'"^'^ ?*" '^'"'=^' ^ «'^''' «"' hm c 0,1. , 4""' "'"' °" ""^ '^"' -^"l^' ''« -^""t rec-' cu'sdnn . T '"'"' '""-"'^^ The clerk [ant L-?l ;'•''''?>■ i^''"" '"^ '•^■^"'•■'^'' ■•iPP''l- heb.;i, i ■""■■.^''-'-'^ replied that he tllought car ; ,r r' -y^f' P^"" '^'^^'^'>'" <>fresponde>7fs cargo owlu.U Appe lant replied, go back and bu o,', t ' , '? '1 ""P'"*'^ '"' •'^''t.-'ocount, I but oil account ol wheat sold S. shortly before beoii.in, ,0 ,he Ba,ik of Montreal, the ck'rk h'T •<"''' , '"!"^' ^•.°" ""- p-"' "•• •'''- g ;V, V '''V ''•''• , ^- P"' ''i'""«'' ant , r ■ ■■ ■?• "'T ■*" '•''''•^'■' '^"'' '"■' 'W"'-l- w^ , i . I "r "' r^!"""" "'^^ ""' ""Putation ,T,?., by ne debtor at the time the pay- ee k "wl "I" '• '' -''"f^' ''f'"*^' ""'^«" l^v "■"-- n t : . , /T""V""' unchanged, and could The CO ', I ■'' """ "PP'''i""t to l«y the $,S,000. n, n, ■'' "*r l'*" '■'''''"" 'o alter the judg- n I t ,1 , ,.. court below. The imputation was made by the parties ai the time, and a recei t given, and ahhough S. might have aid n1^ Hurry si,bso,,uently that he would put i ri "| , Dothnig had ,een done, .lad nent condrme ' ot^thetlfl , ? "''.'"•^'P/'"'''',""' P»v-Men. to which ^ V 'n P P';^'l^"ed, and a receipt having been coul :, "" ',"" '"\"'.'^''",io" the appropnation cul no, Ih. changed by the persons receiving t e money, and moreover such alleged change should have been special I v pjeadeil. AWshmo & A,rkp,,fnek, 22 L. C. J., alter deducing the price of the groceries, vio, rr''' i'""', ""' P'''"'' "'■ ^'""''' '■'»''■';'« Pri-- bX; ' "^'^ /opiaintiir, and then olfered him the money back, and not getting it letl the groceries PAY3IEXT. 576 vliich he had purchased in the store and sued tor the amount of the bank note.-//«// that de endant hal no right to retain the mone;. and ,)iidirment against him with cosis. Brijaiul F,h;jemhl, 4 Q. L. U. (J, C. C. H77 " * 4,t. Respon.lent had been sinetv f.r appellant gattti. Atlerwards he caused several va/«> «/TcV., to issue, on which co^ts were incurrecf Appellant having subsequently ,nade payments on account contemied that h'e had a ri-ht to have the,,, imputed first to the interest-bearbx. debt-//./,/, that they should be imputed on tl.'e whole ani'.iiiit interest and c..,'*1>^° °^ Creditors, see DONA- iiUi\, oaIjI'j, (fee. 44. This was a case, under section 89 of the Insolvent Act of lsG9, of a payment made by an insolvent to a cre.litor within' the thirty dava preceding his assignment. It wa- alleged that ->., the insolvent, made a payment on the ."iUt IJecember, and he assigned on the Slli .January tollowing. Appellant ple.aded that he received payment hiina fide, and further that he held security which he gave up in consideration of he payment The facts were tlio^e : appellant Maa made advances to the amount of $1,007 to $000 withm the thirty ,lays bef ,re S. made an assignment. Ihe court below considered that the law required, to render such a pavment in- valid, that the creditor should know," or iiave reason to know, that the party makin'th- oav- inent was insolvent. And the court Vlow did Imdthat there was evidence of the knowledc-e on the part of appellant that S. was unable o pay bis debts at the time this pavment was made.-//,./,/, that there was not ,>Mi,fioieiil evi- .ience of that (act. The only evidence consisted o the statements of appellant himself on laih el an(f/M, and appellant stated po.itivelv that lie di,i not know of the insolveiicv at the time tlie payment was ma.le. Tiiere \vas another circumstance that indicated whv S. wanted to make the payment. Appellant held a warehouse receipt for several bo.Kes of b ,ots an I shoes and this payment was made by S. to get these .'oods release,!. It was proved that appellant gave ud he securities on getting the moiiev. J t would herelore be the duty of the assignee to return lie security to the creditor b.'lore he could ^et back the money pai,!. .(„ |gm,.,H reversed. Action, lismissed. (X lirlm ^t lirowii, Q. B 1876 40 .\ction by assignee of an insolvent estate oget back troin, lei, .dants m,)iiev pai,l to them by the insolvents within ;iOdavs of ih,.ir assign- ment. Inthespringofl87(it"helirm,)f A ki U 01 MrantlonI, in Ontario, lindiiig themselves in eniharrasse,! circumstances, got an e.xtension 01 tune trom their cre,!itors, among whom the de letKlan s stood for $449, andarrange.l to pay in • . (. and !) rnonths. When the first note be,;ime 'liie, theC.s were unable to meet it, and the creditors, through their solicitors in Brantford ook measures to lorce them into liqu„lation bill were unsuccessful, the a(K 1 ■ vit not b,.in2 consMiered sutlioient by the judge. Thereupon tliey issued an ordinary action, and got paid REDIT0R3, see DONA- 577 PAYMENT. a wvH ul or»a.ds n.uJe. Tl,e evi.lei.ce wh^ not , leet I HiremMgei.ients in full, ati'l jiidgnierit Psh!i:.'''t"'r.'''"'"',''^',''''^»''"''''^ to "'** i'lsolvent , L^- ■~""' ""-' //«,v of proof was on tlie plaintilf. Tne de/e,,da,i. pleaded that in 18li7, C. wa,. tradin;,- t lU^lT'V""^ I" «"^^J cirouiii.staiiue«, and he, the deleiidaiit, hem- his uncle, heca.ne his security loHanls two merchants Ji. and K. in Mom real ; that C continued liis husiness up to he U^-,N,nn^ of February, 1877, and in the i,,- I, T , T, ""''.'•'■■■''"l' '"*^ continue i; that on lit l.tii lA.c, l.S7ti, when this nionev was paid """ ''•'■ *-■ (^''« ''-^ iihout two inonllis'beloie the assi^i.niem;, C. owed 15. SUIU, ai„l K. over $400. lor wiiicnine delendant was liable to iheni as surety, and winch he paui (o theni-the money Ml qiustK.n be.njr given to h m by C. for tbat puipuse. -I lie planiiiH Contended tliat delendant wa. nut a cred.tor of C. at the time of the pav- nient made by the latter; that he had not set- tled Willi JJ. and K. towards whom he was eeourity lor t. ; that C. was then unable to meet lis engugenients in full, and the defendant knew, or nad probahU. cause to believe in tins inability, Jiyi/ie tV»/'i!.-Tl,e quesiiun is really then, was tms a liaudulent payment by C, with' the know ledge of tlie delendant? and the insol- vent law has not changed the common law,exceijt as to tne conclusive presumption arising Iron payments witl.in the ;W days. Tlie evidence does not seen, tome to disclose anything Iron, which Irau.l could be inferred, eid.eV on The one side or the oilier. C. honestiv applwl his earn- ings as captain of a river steamer, and wnile his store was be ng carried on by I,,, employees, to pay his debts to two of his creditor,s-iJ and E It cannot allect the character of the transaction' toknow whether, technically, delendant had be- come his creditor by paying the money Ibrhun, II there \vas no belief on either side ol his insol- vency. J he payment was no less a payment to his creditors, wnethermade through defendant or made directly by himself; and as long as both he and his surety got their discharge IVom thejr common liability. I do not see U,at it makes any dillerei.ce what were the terms granteii by the two creditors to the surety Ihere is evidence that C.'s business m his store was slack ; but none, that J can see, lending to show that e,tl,er he or his surely ought to have known I.e was insolvent. I am, iheretbre, of opimou ty d,s,n,ss this action wilhco«t«. PAYMENT. 578 XI. Proof of. X. I'LAuii OF, see Ukmand op. 47. Where a person made a note en brevet pa^'uble at Ins do„,icile-/y.W, that the cmhtor us bound to make demand of payment at the place spccihed, and an applieuiion hv t!„. debtor lor an extension ol time was not a waiver of his ighi to pay ai such place. Dorion & Jienoii, 1 U N. JoU, fa. C. 1878, & 2 L. N. 171, (j. B. 1879 4,S. In an liypolliecary action for ,i!;i7, balance due iimler a notarial obligation for SVl-ZMd that pavment could |,e proved by par.de evi- dence. J/,«.v^ V. Cot^, 5 Q. L. K. 145. S. C. 1879. JJ. A deed or acle of discharge ,ou^ sdnq purr executed by a, creditor may be set ud against a notarial deed of obligaijoi, in the liamis of a transferee of such creil.lor, and tliat without special proof that the same was si.M,ed and executed at the time it purports h, nave XIII. St'HROa.iTION. 50. A person who lends a sum of money to pay acreditor of the borrower, who mentions in the acknowledgment of the loan that ihe money was lent to pay such creditor, an,l that ihe re- ceipt IS to state that Ihe payment was „,a,k. with he money borrowed for that purpose, ,s not , legally suhrogated in the rights of the ceditor I the receipt does not establish what was in- tended ,,or can the identity of the money be (ault kliuunjeauU & Giyuhe, U R. L. olS), S. . 51 Appellants were the inspectors of the insolvent estate of one li., who prior to his iii- Holvency had borrowed $20,(100 from one II. As Keciirily lor the repaymeutof this money, iJ. bad given a mortgage on certain real estau- and al.so cuutwn, ,oli,lnin:i. Only part of the amount '"g lo *0,o70.20, remaining in the bank to his credit, subject to the approval of U. On the lull ol March, 1870, the amount of the n,ort- gage ,n cap,tal and interest was settled by the r,! *','';w7'''''''''''-'''' ^,^''"g''ve their o^vn cheoue Ol !^.^U87, money borrowed Ibr that piiruose rom respondent, and llie cheque ol U. on the halance remaining in the bank, which with iii- erest amounled at thai time to $1 l,(il;i.(J7. Oa the i.^rd June, 1877, 15 n,ontiis afterwards, by 'Uedot transfer and subrogation before iiolarv. respondent was siibrogate.1 in the rights of the caui/o,,., .-,oh,lairtK against the insolveiil, includ- ing the mortgage belbre mentioned. ()„ the insolvency of the latter the respondeul hle.l for the hil ■amount-lidd, that under the L\xle, Where the payment is made by the debtor with Ixjrrowed money, the subrogation of the lender Hoes not re.pnre to be made simiiltaiieouslv wilh the payment, and that the respondent Ihere- ore under the deed of subrogation was entitled to rank by privilege for ihe full amount of the 18. It; ll,w-115U, C. C.t •Uoiilinnpii ill p. c. iMiirch, 1881. I ^vIm''"*'''"'"" ''' ""I'veiitional: I. \M,u.i tli,^ civditor .m riiwhing pavmonl from a til iril jieivon siibroKiites him in ' ' ■ * list the tait at 1. bt„i. 11,18 ..Hbr„K,ui..„ must bo exprt*^, anUiuu Ihesaii,., iliii,. asMie|ia.vm..iit .»"u'u.i .m'vi.yj'i'.'il.' '''V '''^■'"'.'■' hornuvB a 8,im fer the puiims,, of n iita .1. til, ,.re,iit..r, it 13 iiccesiiary to Hit- u.li.iiiv of the «ibroK„-:.,„ l„ tl,i« ea«e thai the act of l.,a , ,7the thi, 5 """,-«'^^»): that ill the act of loan it be declared that iM ^., i ;,a» beuu borrowed for the purpose ot pay- im a t 1 4 n m S^^l jS^^H 579 PAYMKNT. .) . Uy 110 anal, lord pa'^scl in Jamiarv, 1864, A I . an. I S. ]'. ackMnvvl(..|„a.,| ti,e,nsi"iv,.s in- d(;hir,| lo A. I,. 1,1 tlic siuii oliSIOl), and .'Hvp liiM. a Mioi-t-a.^r,. ,„ s,.,;iirit.v ,if tl,e iiavnu-nt ..f he saiiu.. Hy anotlirr.l..,.,! ,uss,.,| i„ Jannarv, lHj>, 'lif''iiiiie|,ai'li(.HackM.nvl(.,lj;,.,li|H.rn-elv;.s iiMli'i.lcil tu jilaiiililfii, ili<. sum of J!l:i(), wlncli thov iii-oriiisci I,, pv liiin a- iiiciitioiUMl in tlic di-nl, aii.l 111 vvliicl, ilii.y. di'cl-.ivvA that th.'V iK.ri-oacl Ihciiioiioy Iruii, phiiiiiiir to pay A. I/, an. a,i;rml lo siilir,i;:ai.' phiintiil rii"a|| t|„. rif.'ht-< ul A. L. Hy ,|,.,,l 01 iiimtaiice and dis Cliai-t' pas.,.,1 at tlie .saiim time A. L. ackiiow- Ic'd'.'.'. Iiaviii^r received from the,hdHors $110 in lull ut the money due him „nder the liist deed, and S.I 1 .rotated plamtitl' in all his ri-hls &(!. Ill the meantime the delitors had s„|,i il,o land liyiiolheciued to defendant, and hence ac ion in dedarali.in of hvp„thec hy the s»W/« --//,.,/, that under Art. ll.Moftlie Civii Co.le, the snhro-ation was c;ood u-ainst thi.' hcrf, ,l,/nit,„r who had acpiired the pro- perty H:loi-e tlK- suhro;.Mtioii. Ch„i>,Maine & tlucitlher, lU R. L. 687, C. C. Ls.so. XIV. Ti;ni)ku of. 5:!. A teii.jer of payment to ho valid must he of the exact sum or thin- due unconditionally ; an, Iheielore wli,.re a railway company wlii,"di Jia,leii-a-e,l a civil enjrinf ,.r at a salary to he paid m ca.hor in hon.ls ofihecompanv at 50 cents II, the ilollar was siie,l li,r a ha'lanee of Balaryaiii,iuiitiii-to*(;iO,-io, pleaded a tender,,' tliiM'c l,on,ls of the face value of .fl.oOO on con- d.lioii ol receiyin- §2lil in change, the len,i,.r was h,.l,l invalid. U-,,,,r & Lawrnliau liail- w,vi tn., ., L. \. 2:{, ,t -21 L. C. J. 1)8, Q. B. 51. Ilia dispute between the appellant and lis architect com;erniri^' .s,jnie$SI, extra pai,i or a 1,11 instva,! of a -ravel root, the appellant teii.lered the halance ,lue the architect less the *>8l. home fourteen months afterwanls ivsnoii- deul wrote lutcepliii,;/ thisoifer. ll,s acceptance not iK.ving been answere.l for nineteen ,lays he Bue,l lor the whole amount -//e/,/, thai his a,.'ceptance not liavin- |,een acle.l upon forlifieen PEREMPTION. PEACE. 580 orKi'M^'"^'** °*'' *■«'' JUSTICES OF THE PEN"ALTIES, II. In Ai'i'KAi,, aee APPEAL. III. ixc KliKI. |,v Ot'KlCKlt.^ OF CoMl.A.VIKS IV. In Oiii.Ki.viiox.s, .ice ACTION o.v. V. On- SKciMiirv Bond in Ai>ft;.vi, to tub hll'HKMK CoiUT, .stil- API'EAI;. VI. Pi.K.uiixij i.v Action Foil, , see ACTION VII. Pliooi- IN ACTI,)N PMl L'NI)|.;il E,,ko- TioNs Act, .see ICLECTION BAW LAW. """'"'''" ^"^''""^ '^'^'^ *'«'^ LICENSE PEXSION". MENtT ^'•'''■'''■'''•"'^^'*' Ciii»uiu;.v, see ALI- PENSIOXS. .whXEGUnON, E.\K.Mi'Tiox.s. 11. To ine.nhers of civil .service an,) public employees, 8.40 Vic. cap. 10, & 44, 45 Vic. cap PEREMPTION-. iriK tlHMli'ht. nml that in tlip fKquitl.ance it be declared fur„i.l„Ml l.y il„. ,„.w ,.,vdi,or C.itliat parpij 'iVis execii.Ml l„.„„, »,,,„ws,.,s 11,0 s„l,r,..,i,i„„',„k,., ,.„;,,,, aff;i"K„,n |,..,s..„sl,-„m ,i„. a:,,o ,.„lv ,.f tl„.i,- ,vk,s. tUlt,..,,. H ,1,1, 1- I,, l„. „,,.i,„. i„ ,|„, |„,,|,n,, .,,„, ,„.j.,„.,,7„„ ^;!:u:":t i^^i^'ii "^ '"^ '"^ ••- -^'-t-tK.:":i- aim wX,:;';i, .uiu;;;: """" "^ "■•' ''"' "f'"""'"" "f '"^^ 1 111 lavwroi a cnMliioi- nlio j.ajs aiiotlier crediler ht pomee ; " ^"''''''""'" '" '"" ">' "■^"">" "'' P"vilege or 2. ilii Ivorof the iniri'lias,T of iimnovciible nroniMiv Wlm,, :«a erc.d,t.>f U,Hl.,„„tl,e i,,„p..„y i, !,j.„'.;t!,'/. :i. 1„ favor of n juirty wlio pays a del.t for wliicli ho is h^K i,"' ' """""'■ '"'' "'""■'• "'"' ""'•'"' i''^ero.st i„ ,'a;' 4. Ii, linor of K bciieliciary lipir wlio pavsa debt of tlic BUcci-Moi, will, li,4 o\v„ moneys- &. When a ri'„i or ,ii, ijy o„n consort alone lins been iv,le na-d or ,,»id will. ii,o ,no„«y, ol the ca' nu„U> ,uil,»o.,.,iil,e oilier ,-o„»,„-t i^ subroK^t,:, i"i thv !-iL'!i!so ,!,■.■ rr.d.u.r Hce- i,i,„- to llie ^llal■o oI hue consort ui the community, lijc c?Q I. Costs wiikn Ghaxted. II. Intkkri'i'tion of. III. SL-til'KNDlil) BV I.VSCRIl'iION K.V FaI'.X. I. Costs whkn Uranthd. 55. A party in a cause who lias ob(aine,l per. eniMtion i.s entitle,! to cwts of the action. Gfr- main A: Lacour.iiere, :i Q. I,. R, -271, S. C. ISJT ^1). Ill cases of peremption the action will alway.s be declare,] p,riinec witl; costs, unless very special circumstances be u,i,iuced to pr». vent the comlemnatioa in co-ts. .Sinclair v. McLean, 22 L. C. J. 107, S. C. 1877. II. IXTKItRl-l'TION OF. 57. Proof by par.)]e evidence of an alle,'ed compronus,' between the partie.s cauii,)t he per- muted lor the purpose of provin.r au interi-up- louol peremption, r/uinaif v. Coc/mme, 22 L.L. .1. 10b, S. C. 1877. 58. Pourparlers lor the coinpromiRO of a case «->„.■ ■■ . ;t lilt, ,11,,., t peretuptiun, but tne prool ot tliese jiourparlers cau only be made MPTION. 580 ACE. JUSTICIW OF THE Kii Ei.KCTioN- Law, see ■ )kK1(!KU.-I of CoMl'AXIKa w Insi-kctiox ok Hooks, «« ACTION ON. >XI) IN- AlU'li.vr, To THE noM FoK, .sec ACTFON 10\ Pm CXDKIl Hi^Ec. ONJ.AW. •KNT Alt, see I.VSOL- Law, 6ee LICENSE 5 ION". CuiTURio.v, see ALI- [OXS. ExKMi'T FROM Seizure, Hl'TlON.S. vil «ervi(!c ami public . 10,&4t, Ij Vic. cap t'TION". ED. scRiPuoN EX Faux. ED. w!io lias obtaiiied per- l8 ol' the notion. G,'r- i'- H. 271, S. C. 1.S77. pliou the ciclidii will 'ic vvitl; costs, unless s be uiiiluced to pre- in coAL PLANT. PHOPERTY^'^^™, ^:- ,^f~". .es, see PLEADING. I. Amendment of, see INJUNCTION II. Axswek. ^^^^1. III. liY. C/u7d. Interrennnt. Manieil Woman, I'er.stms iSiced Jointlu. Tutor. " Wife. ly. Chose Ji'oioe. y. CoXCl.l'slox-i. VI. Declakaiiox. Ameiidtneiil of. yil Deci.ixatoky E.xception. VIII. Dkfkxse ex Fait. IX. Delays ix, see PROCEDURE A. DEMriiUKIt. v!; ^I;-^'*'' "^' Signature. \\\\ ^;l'"*'""v Exception. V ■ '^''"''■•'•'"N' T<» THE Form. AIV. I'EAIl OF TlSOfllLE. Yvf ^'V"'-'''''"-^^"''-. •"'.■e PROCEDURE AVI. I'OKM OF. >JiiiJ. vMf; ^^•^'■:'"*i' IJexial. A\ III. Ix AfTION.S. Aijainsl Church Fabriqiiea. Aj/aiiixt .School Covimhsioners lor IcHalhj, Kt ACTION (JL'i Tam For SeparulUm de Corps. For ISlauder. in '' \m 'M til rifi ? 683 PLEADING. PLEADING. 584 /'/(• S!jirriid A.incs,imeiit. or Ihiiii'iijes. XIX. In Ki.Ecriox Cask.s, see ELECTION LA W . XX. Tn' In'tkuvkxtiom. X.VI. Ix Oi'i'osiTiov, see OPPOSITION. XXII. IllKKl.KVANT i'l.K.VS. X.VIII, Liii|.|, CoxTAixKi) IX, see LIBEL. X'.\ I V. .MiSDKSCUII'TIOX. X.W. UVKllCHAKOK. XXVI. I'av.mkxt. X.W 1 1. I'llKSCUll'TlOX. X.XVIii. Hki'i.kaiikk. X.\l.\. Rkim.icatiox. X.V.X. Sl'KCMAI. AxtfWKR. X.XXI. Si'i;(;iAi, Replication. XXX 11. TiTi.K. linrx Criiiiiiiit! Prnseriition for Injuni to 7'/7-/»'/7v, .ftr CRIMrNAI. l.AW.^ -X.NXlil. To Pki'ii-ouy Action. XXNIV. rxiiKR Ixsoi.vKXT Act, see IN- S0IA'I':NCY. XXXV. U.NDKii Ei.KCTiox Laiv, see ELEC- TION' l,V\V. X'.XXVI. Waxt of Ixtkhkst. XXXVII. Want of Ji'iu.-^iticTioN'. I. Amexdmkxt of, {i2. In IV rt'iUiibitory a<'tion conocriiiiijr a horse, :ui iippliuiiticin ti'i chaiviie " win^l j/all " to "spriiij,' liiilt"' uiH //,/7. Jntifrreitaiit.— An intervening party can- not [jleiiil matters of form that are personal to the delcndant. Ilulchiiwin & Ford & Short, 22 L. C. .1. 279, S. C. 187S. US. iJa, ried Woman.— X wife suing for rent does not require to plead her authorisation, as it i,« a mere act of administration. Ihsmmteau k liailUe it I'crrautt, 3 L. N. 100. S. C. 1880. •No particular form of worils is required in any rieailiiis; ; but <'very tact ttie exibtonee or tnuli of wliicli ianiil expriTOly dciiird ,ir drrlnrod to tw uuknowu Ij huld to be udimlted. lU C. C. P. fiO. Per.in»i .'^iiedJointh/.—T oppr^ouomed injonit quality such as joint tutor tnav by one exception to the form plead matters applj.'ahle separately to one or the other defendant. Court V. C,///. 3 L. N. 349, 8. C. 1880. 70. Hi/ Tiilor.—S. tutor who sues for the minors m his charge to recover their share in a succession is not liound to set up that he has lieen authorized to accept the «ucces-ion cm he '(•?l '*i' ''"" '"'".'"''*■ ^^^>'ard V. Ldendre, 7 R, L. 71. Nor is he hound to allege in his declar- ation that the acte of iutelle liaH been rflgister- eil. //). 72. Nor even where the action concerns the shares ofthe minors in itiimoveables the tutor IS not bound to set up that he is authorized to bring the action, lb, l:i. Hi/ 'rfYc— a wife who sues with her bus. band is not bound to set up her marriaire in tlie bwlyofthe declaration if in the title of the action she is described as wife of the other [jlaintitr. ^ Birard v. Lctendre, 7 R. L. 31)1, 74. And where she sues as heir she is not bound to allege that she has been authorized by her husband to accept the succession, lb. IV. ClIOSE .Jl'OEE. 7"). Where the circumstances of (he twpcases do not perlectly correspon.l a pleaof cAasv/w./t'e will be dismissei 87, S. C. 1S80 1. 2)c.iice V. Careau, 3L.'N. V. Coxci.ivsiox.s. 7fi. A contestation wliicli attacks a ileed of sale as nnide in fraud ofcreiiitors, but dues not ask that it lie set aside and annulled, cannot he maintained. Bl.niin v. Laiii/elicr,:\ Q. L. R. 272, S. C. R. 1877. VI. Declaration. 77. Amrndmeiil of.— KcV\i\n on a promissory note which plaintilf alleged had been made by detendant to the order ofthe other defendant who endorsed it to plainlitf. In reality the note had lieen made to the co-defendant persoiKilly and not to his order. Belbre issue joined the plaintitt'm.jved t.) amend in the following terms: " Que Ic.i defendeurs doivent au dcnianden'r " cent piastres el dix.jiuit centins, pour autimi " en ari/ent prM, pour laouell,- soinny le.f dd- '•Jendeiir.i donnerent au demandeur un billet " promi.i.soire .iii/ii6 par le dit Sei/iiy et eiido.s:ii " }>ar Lemonier comme acaV'—llel'd, that such an amendment changed the nature of the ile- mand, as liy the tirst declaration the delendant was sued for a commercial debt prescriptible in five years, while by the amended declaration tlRMJefendantH would be sued for a civil debt which could only be prescribed in thirty years, and proof of whicii could only be inade liy witrie8.ses. Venner v. ISeijuy, 4 Q. L. II. 0, S. t lo78. VII. Declixatoiiy Exception and Demib- KEIt. 7.8, The defendant filed a declinatory excep- tioii, and the piaintitt' demanded pleas to the ^DING. 684 nthi. — T o por-'nii') sued joint tutor nmv by orii' tlcail iiiiUtpr.H ii|)|)li(Nilile otlicnlefcnduiit. (Jonrt C. 1880. itor who siu'-< for tlie } recover their '*lmre in 111 to Het lip tliiit he line pt the siicces-ion ,;/i.,«.s7. en dmii on th'e ground that |,luintiir had onlv a hvpothecary recourse; that he had never promised to pay hiinaiiy.letermuiate .sum of luonev, and that by the action the ojition should havi' been >Mven iimol paying thepiaiiaitfs rights in kinih and that the plaintill had not remained m the .ser- vice ol the tlelendant or hi.s antenrs until he was tweiitv-oiie years of age as he was bnund to do by the deed ol donation, ami as he had not done so his rights were completely extinguished. At cm/^Wc the delendant admitted that he had lieen present ai an interview between the donor and the plamtill at the time of the excbaio'e, at ^vliici, It w,i, aLoeed that the plaiutill's ri.'hts »hi reduced to ftOO, without saying of What the reduction was to be made, uiid whet] the.? 00 wa.s to be paid in money or not, and h endj'Mt admitted that he had'alwavs 'been ica.h opay the *4()0 to plaintilf, but "be had •einsed to accept .1-//,,/,/, t|,,„ „, „,, ,.,^.,,,,,„ he plamtill no h.nger consisted in |a>„l and kind but in the sum of SIOO, payable in n.onev, that the demurrer must be dismissed. n,.,/oni, 8;{. Appellant alleged that he was a immiher ol the I'resbytenan Church of ('•tnada in co" "'•'•tion with the Church of Scotland, d nnnster and member of re.pondent.s' boa ^ Viu cap.(,(,, "Inch statute IS still in lorce; that ■crtam mmi-ters of said church on the 1.^ •';nie, I.s,o,dis.solved their connection u.isa ;;'""•'• ['.'I'^'tresnondeiits were about t, v •"■111 their stipend out of the temporalities i „ d owhichtbey„..,uldhavebee,ienthledlad I y Mill seceded, and to allow said fund to ass iiiiier the control of a n-w board, mid tl • t ai? 1-1. nt will he personally injured ti;; '.;/:; S^^ I'layed that the assets of.-aid fund and ", roll s "lid revenues accrue.l thereon mav be deVia red o be I be excusive property of tliePresbvter . l""-<-' ;'t Ciuiada m connection with ' hiirch ol, Scotland and of the member.,, re ! i.at the members only of said clnirc wo maintain then- conneetn,,, therewith he entitled to participate m the beiielits ,,r said fi,n,l u '■""lle;l to hold and administer the n,;, ' accordance with the statute creating, t a nir the purposes therein specilicl ; that the mini, ters "I "<;-ibersol,siidch,ii,d, who have seeeed I"' ileclaied incomoetent, and not entitle ,o b'^'ticipate ,1, the (lenetits ,lerivable loi tl e pnncpaland nileres, of the said lund u, ,e leveniies accrued thereon, ami incompel', , ii 1 iiehgible to hold (M'admini-ter the .-rea„ng,|, that the deleiidants be rest, lined ;"Hl '■n.iomed from diverting the ca, it , evenu..s thereol Lxnu the objects conte la,^ h he said statute and act ol incorpor i ■ .-'aid board, and be ordered not ,o pav a ,v L on 01 ,he capital or revenues accn.ed n ! , i to the innnsters or representatives of mi, s e s p,.eviously connected with the said c re, vho have seceied therefroni, u,,d,.r p i , • ! havm, it.s members per.sonallv con.l..,, , j .viiav the same to those l.-^-allv-entit!ed er ,o° an.m,a.,hesaiddele,idaiitsand,heirsu!! '^; n < Ihce legally elected he o.-deivd and enioi,red to hold and admini.ster the ..aid fund a , rp. venues accrued ,he,,M,i solely tor the be -tor the Presbyterian Church of Cmada .'„ ,. tioM with the Church of >!;:£; ':i'-- "''•mbers thereol whouKuiitain theirco.ineet on herewi.h, m accordance with the prov, o ,s o he said statute or act of incorp,n-atio„ en Ued ;>:,'''';^';'^'''''''e-'-7t'"^^ai.l,nniito «: ci imv-Ndd, m appeal, that as appellant ad setlorth no pe.'sonal grievance a,,,l as ,. ."^ not shown that the .statute under which res, i.lenl.^ were acting was uiico„.-.li(, ' ' ' lis conclusions, if granted, iitiiiioiial, "•mi, Id he 20 dechu-atory of the law, and would ord Hpeciho thing which could be enlor uierely er no that the .;Ul ^f.,1 •.'I ■\K f-im ii 687 PL R A DING. PLEADING. 588 action wa« propcTly .lisinisse,! on .Icnnirrcr. /■""•'{.'■■ ', u",':''i'"' ''^""".'/'■''"■"C ';/ Temporali- ties J-itiiil, H li. L. ;j, g, |{. i,s7(;. ' Ki. Action lor a |,iMmlly l,_v tlie Huperintendent ol tducation a>raiii.«t tl,>- Hcjrt.tarv-trcasnrcr of tlip m'KmjI (.■oniiiiiMHioners of liie ' pari.-h of St Ualiricl ,!(. linmdon Cor rcdisal to .li'livcr iiij the iKM.k- nrui papers in lii,> cliar^e alter liein'- diKM,iss,.,| Iroin the ollirc hv resolution ol tiie tJoanl. Dcleiidiuii pl.a.ltd [,y demurrer that Here was nothin- in the declaration to Hh„w that he liad been rejrularlv ihsniisseii j tliat it (Jid iiot appear that he liad U'en served with [lolieeol liis(hsniis-al, that action wuiiM only lie lor one day's penally and nut lor several davs — y/cW, disniissni;,' the demurrer on uil these iK.inis. Ouimet v. J'kM 7 li. L. 030, S. C. lo ( 7 , K,".. A Hiiit was taken out, nccoiiipanied by capnis. J hedelendant contested the capias, and liud since pleaded to the merits. The plamtiir put in a demurrer to this plea, and also a special answer, and the oilier side moved to reject the demurrer, and also the special answer. Hutli IlK-e motions had lieeii jiraiited. On appeal— JJ'I'l, that the jiidv'meiit iniisi he reversed, as a cienuim rcoiild not he rejected on motion. Caiui- Uum Bank oj Commirce k liiowii, (j. B. lyjt!. »^ti. In an action ol damages afjamst a JHiimcipal Lorpoiation lor luiviiij; run a road Ihmn-h |)lainti(r's properly and ielt it unlenced —tltOl, that a demnirer woiiM not lie, iiotwitli- Maiiilingthe tact that it it were a front road the Corporation wonl.j not he liable. Wliitiimn & Corporalwn oJ Tou-nxhip oJ Sluiibfidije, 2;i Ijt C li . i lb, Q. u. liSJH. 87. Plamtill allejied the sale of a beach lot todeleiKlant, and that delendanl after takiii.r pos.seSMon of the lot refused to sign the deed ol' sale or to pay the price as agreed to the daime'e ol i)laintiti, who was thereby prevented lioTii Btlecimg a tavorable -ale to aiiuther; and iilain- tifl' concluded lor §525 damages, and lor the reliiiii of the lot to him in nelaiilt of delen- (lant'sexecnt.ng the deed and paving the interest Demurrer, that plamtill alleging a complete Fale to delendant cuiild not claim dama-'es lor not having been able to sell to another, im'i^ could he demand to get back the lot without fir>t obiaining a rescision ol the sale, nor deiendant tlieieloie be coiulemned to the uhernativt Held, that the general allegation of ilamiiges resulting Ironi ilefendant's relusal U) sign Uie deed was snilicieni to support the conclu-Tun lor damages, and siivh general allegation was not to be cun-ideied a.- restricted tjy the statement that deiendant s said reln>al had prev. nted a fa\ or- able saie lo another. Mulz v. J'uraili..i, 4Q L \{ 2i)l,S. C. iKTrt. H«. In a^i aetK'ii against the sureties of an ex- Fher.rt of M..iilieal a (leminrer was tiled by de- fendants lu the ileclaral.oii, alleging that im- portant ivile-aiions ol the drclaratiou ciiar'rii|,r he iielendaiiis with re- pon.-ibiliiv ariMUi' out St' hedelaultot the late siierilf. •' wantol iiaegritv, Imnesty or ti lel.t>, ur by the negligence, d°lairit' or irregularity ol the ^a id late, etc."— //eW, to be objeeiiommle, but demurrer dismissed with- out est,, wiihasug-e-tion I.; plaintiff !•. amend h'on.t V. Citizens Insurance Co., 2 L. N. Itii, 8. C. o 1 J. droit I'nu]- plaiiiiiifH tin- wliiel, Bunt w «.>. Defendant pleaded twoexceptio-is followed hv a (/,;/e«,ve en dr„it— 11,1,1, dismissin e dfjeiixe en ,ln,it, the same being pleaded "alter two other pleas, the second ,.l whicii covers ij,,. i fr\v2'Vl''s''c''iJr'r '''''''■ ^^'■■'■^'"■^- '^"'^'"' I IK). In aiioilier case the //(V«;i.»(; e/( I nieiiced l,y protesting that all the I allegations were false and nntriie, reason it Wiis dismissed as irre-'iilar Cuntu, 2 L. N. 2'Jl, S. ('. IST'J.^ ;»!. Action lor a suhscription to a liospinn 1 he declaration alleged that the defendant siil,- scrihed the sum of $200 to a hospual to he mcorjiorated, and that the incorporation Imd since been duly had. Demurivr on the ground that the action was base.l on a prmni-eof fniure donation, ami that it was not alleged that it was made m authentic lorm, or that anv a.'eepl.mce thereol was nmW-ikId, that as a donation was not alleged, and the subscription might have heen tor valualile consideration, thai the ^k- inurrer would .lot lie. Western l/„.spital v. Ou,/Jrey, .i L. N. ,{47, S. C. 1S8U. XI. Ukxiai, of Si(i.v.\ruuii. 92. Motion by defendant to be allowed to liio pleas to an action on a in>te utter lorecloMiiv. Uiie was lonieled on an allidavit charging Iniit the signalnie to a note was not ttie signalin-e uf .lelendanl-y/c/,/, that the allegation of for-eiv was not made m tne terms rcpnred by the Code and lliereloie the anplejation could not ne granted. Milloy v. Farmer, 2 L. N. 182, S. C. XII. Dilatory Exckptiox. 9.!. Where, by a deed of sale of a lot of land, the vei.ilor obliged liini.-elf to furnidi letters patent within ayear from date of deed. The de- lauli to do so 111 live years was held to he pro- perly pleaded by dilatory exception, in au>wer to an action tor instalmenis ol ine piirclia-e 'noney, tlie obligation to lurnish sucli letters patent liemg an ,djti,/(iH„n i,r,'jiidicielle to tlie I emand of the plainiiij-. lUmchard v. Thimen/e, 4y. 1.. U. 152, C. C. 1«T8. -^ XI 11. ExCtl'llON TO TIIK Foll.M. .14. Where an action is brought in tlie name ol tlie wrong per.son, it should be attacked by a exception to the lorm and not by n dr/ens,' ,n dioit. Lididie ii. Gratton, 7 K.' L. ;i25, Ma-. Ct. 1874. ° '.»o. I'laintitl; as xeque.itre of the property in dispute, broii;;lit action to set aside a pretended donation, ami 10 gel an account from deiendant. Detendant tileil an exception to llie lorm on ilie grouiKl that piuintili'. as scpieMre, had no right ol uclioii. , er tV/y/m//— 1^ tliat properlv tne siihject ol an exeeption a la Jornie! I 'think e.eany not. It says to the plamlitf: " you show no right of action in your person." Ab- sence ol right of action, if the allegations are admitted to be true, is matter of (lemurr;'r, or of fin de Win receroir; not of exception us to the lorm. Laframboise & jUamour, S- C. 187(!. vmxG. 589 588 PLEADING. lt\viM'X,;(.fiti()nn lollowcl — llilil, ilisiiiinMin^ ilje Mif licjii;; (jleadcil aftfr iMi'l 111 wliicli covers l|ji> 'li-iiit. Jieii/trv. iJfolii,, II' ili'lhi.fi- en ifrolf r,n)]\. iljiit nil ihf |iliiiiiiiir's mill Miitnif, Ini- wlinili as irrej^iiliir. haul \\ '. I.S7y ''t'ri|iliciii to a lii)M|ii|:ii. iliiil till' (IftVn.liim >iili- >lt to a hospilal In lie llip iiK'iii|)i)rati()n lia^l 't'linirnr on llif;;foiui>l I on a jiroiiii-cor liiiiirf < iiol alie^ieil thai it wa.t or lliat aiiv a''cc|i|,ui(;e , iliai as a ilonalion uai Uii;i'i|iiioii iiii^'lii liaie iilei'alioii, thai ilic .i^- Wextcrn Uo.ipilal v. ;. 1S80. lUllE. lit to bo allowpil to lilo iiiilc alter loreulo-iiri.. ulli'lavil chai'jiiiii; innt 'i-* not iiif .-ij^iialiire ul' le allei;alii)ii of loi;;crv ■< reijiiireii hy tlieCoiU", I'Jaiioii could lint he itT, 2 L. N. 182, S. C. noN, if Nile of a lot oflrtii.i, ■I'll' to fiirni-h li'tiers ilalooi'deeil. The ile- 1 wiiH held to he jiro. exception, iii aii>\ver ieiiis ol me |)iircha-e ' Inniish --iicli leltern '' I'l'jiit/icii'l/i; to llie iiiur.hurd V. Tkwierije, K FoKM. I lii-oiiglit in the name oiilil he attacked hy a i not hv a ilct'ciisi' in •h 1 K: L. ;!25, Maj;. Ve ol'ihe properly in I set aside a ()/etended euiiiit fr.jiii deleiiihiiil. on lo Ihe loriu on ihe "que.ntie, had no rif;lit -Is that properly ine I la Jonne? I 'think the plaiiiliti': " you your person." Ah- ir Ihe allejiaiions are Iter otdeiiiiirr^'r, or of I exception as to the mour, S. C. 187(!. XIV. Fkar ok Tiioriu.K. itii. Where a defendant pleads tear of tronhle or eviction he ,s not hoimd lo so |,v a dihuorv exception, I nt may do so l,v a plea U, the rits- IirayiniT that the plaint, iPh aiuion he declared' |M-einal,ire and he dismissed, unless «,|hin a tune lo lie hxed l.y Ihe court llie plainlitreilher (•an. e Ihe inorl;.'ai.'e lo he dischar-ed ,>r .-ive the .ictcnilant security to Ke-p juni harmless In.ni 21s|'s'."(ri>"lS79 '' '^ ^'"^"""' ^ ^- '- "■ XVI. FoUM OF. 07. An aclion was held to he rijjhtiv di-miss- ciently ihelled, as not showing to whom tne land, which was the siihject of the action, li'id icei, translerred, nor hy what deed nor what was the date of the deed, nor the nam,' cl the notary who received it, nor the idace S Q.' B!''l87'r'''''"'' '^'"'"'^ '■ '^''"'""' " "• ^'■ i'M;.\i)iNrr. 590 XVII. Gk.\krai- Dkxiai.. 9f«. Toan action of dainaf,'ps for the vi,,hili,iii ol a patent the delenilant pleaded a L'eneral (Icnial.— //,'/,/, that under this he conM not jirove that the patent was in use ami well known lo.i^ before the plaintitl-s was ohtained. Hard V. l>ioiint;,i L. iV. 80, S. C. 1830. XVIir. In Action. 9!). A!/ain>tt C/nirr/i Fabrifpten.—Jn an action liy p(ii-oi«si,-iis ettnliiiriuiK a-ainst the liihrioiie It IS necessary that the plamlills allege not that tiey are of a Komaii faiholiu paiish, hut that they Ihemselves are K-inan Catholics. Vnrrin- V if\ .y «' ManjuilUerx, &c., .i Q. L. li. 27, is. I. . 18il>. 100. Aijaitist Sc/ioul C'-J''^-/>'P oj Stanlnidi/r, 2.'! L. C. J. 17G, Q.IJ. XX. I.\ IXTKliVKXTION. lOr., Toan aeli(,ii against an executor three ••Mildren of ,lecpascd intervened, and alleged that bey were ol age, that they were Ihe iiniv..rsal egalees of ,h.cea,sed iiinler her will, and ihat they had an intere-t in the conservatimi of her estate, andangliitoivaich over its administra- tion. Ihey alleged also that the estate had never rec<'ived any value Ibr Ihe notes sued „„ I lie plaintill having contested this intervention " ■ grounds such as would be urge,! if the inler- fion had been a plea to the merits the inter- • ng parties filed a reponxe en droit u> \Ue cor'estation, among other grounds "because till reasons invoked in the contestation ,.,ul,l not lie pleaded against the right of the iiitei- veimii: parties to intervene in the preseni caii.se —tUtd. mainlaiiimg the r<;>on>:,' en droit, that he intervenants had still a right to plead to the instanre prinviimle. Frun.s v. Lionai.s & Lionui.s, 2 L. N. 19,5, s. c. 1879. XXII. IHRKI.KVANT Pl.KA.S. lOi; M,,tionof the plaintiff to strike out of lie (lefendunt s i.lea certain wonls as irrei'iilar- ly inserted, and in general tern.s Hndiii. "fault with plaii.tills accounts. The plainiitf was secrelary-treasnrerof the defendants and, hav- ing ceased to fill that office, brought his action to have a surety bond given bv him in favor of the society cancelled, and to llave the hypothec Which he had given on his property," as u further security ol $rOOO in the sain'e matter, removed. Ihe defendant nieaded that by the liye-lawsof the society, 2iid section of the .'isth article the plaintill, as secretary-treasurer, was ohhged to submit a complete and exact state- ment ol all the business of the society for the .year terminating the 28lh February last j tha by virtue of .3rd section of said article the said report should be certified by the majority of the auditors; that plaintiff haii failed to ■coinplv wall these rules. The defendant then went on to charge that there were grave errors ami omi.ssions in the accounts and books kept bv the plaintitl: that the cash of the society had not alw;,ys been correctly balanced, and that, importanl ditlerences and cont -adictions existed between the book.^ kept by tlie plaintiff and the depo.sit and otb - '■•.nk books of the society; and that, seein; i' said grave omissions and errors which \,\ and in his book' ••id accounts the defeiiu...i[ is well founded in k.ub- 5^1 . 'Ill 1 •*.= m ; i t'l A^" SOI rLEADINO. iiij; tli(> iliw.'lini'Ke' nf ilic Hiiivtv bond un W.ikIh ul tlic |,|,.,i <'lllir^ri,|jr jflllVf I'mWH mill (.lui^sidiis ill his iiccdiiiils >li-iu;k (lUl, on the j;i'iiiii(| (Imi ilic-c Mint Ht- arc iidt at iN-uc luiilcr llic|il(iiiliii^',,f (he parties and that tlip allcjra- lioiiH lire iiio vaL'iic and jri-ncral tor a ilrhdl.H^il,- ciiMpf,'; tliat 111.' dcli-ndant wu.s lidnnd to him- ciiy in a clear niannt'r lli oiiiij-fions in ilip lavf crrorH and 'I'Ih' cciiirl granted tlie nictuiii. Liiiii/UiiiS: Mdiiiit h'ci/itl i'ciinaiieii BuilihiKj Siicic/i/, S. C. 1H7(). X.\l\'. .MisiiKscini-riox. 107. Aeticin against a (irni. Plea tliat no part- nersliip existed. Kvidenee of a linn, Imt nut compo.-ed us allej:ed. Action di>nii'^seil, lint withciit euste, a,>« the plea Hlmiild have set up the pi-o|ier eoinposiii.m of the (irni. Morci/ v. Guheilij, •> L. X. 108, S. C. 1871). XXV. UVKIUIIAIUJK. 108. Where a nuinicipal cormration pretends that an aecoiint is overchartieil tliev must plead anil prove it in the onlinarv wav, and aresuhi- tion of u ciiinniiltce will nut avail a" evidence to that elleet. S/;/c v. C'/7y „/ Montreal, li L. N. 72, S. C. l8oU. XXVI. PAY.MKNT. 109. Where to an action for ri^rlit." of succes- ."jon theilelendant pleaded a general denial, and tiled a co|)_v of a notarial discharge— //,/(/, tiiat he should have pleadeii pavinent in order t' admit the exhibit. Cadtaix v. Cadieux, 2 L. X. l'J.l, S. C. 187U. XXVII. PUESCIUI'TIOX. 110. A conte.station of an oppo.oition for pay- ment, on the ground that the same wa.'i foundeil on a ('onstitiited rent more than 30 year.s old uilhoiit interruption of |)rescription being alleged — JJclil, bad on demurrer, because, as re" gards long jirescriptions under Art. 2b'<8 of the Civil ("ode, they must be pleaded to be taken advantage of, and the oi)posant wa.s not lioiind to allege interruption of piwcription until that prescription was pleaded to his oj)position. S(iii.v/i!7,-. which w.nibl bring (he amount to the bala'nce tendered— y/c/i/, on motion, that this could n.jt lie set up in an answer and must be set usiile Oixi-il V. Shaw, W 1,. N. 90, S. (;. 1SH(), _ 114, And /(«7r/, also, that such interlocutory .liidginent could not be revised by the court at the hearing on the merits. lb. XXXI. Sl'KClAI, RKl'I.If'ATIOV, 1 lu. A ppecia may be court. repi . ication to a special aiLswer ' filed without obtaining leave of the Carter v. Furd, :i L. N, 338, S, C. 1880, XXXII. Title. lit!. The rule in petitory actions tliat a deed not pleaded cannot be produced at iinjiii'te as part ol a ehainof tillesdoes not apply to actions lor moveables, and, on the contrary, in such actions title need not be alleged, toiiritniii .t Bom-hard, 4 Q. L. K. 213, S. C. K. 1878. 117. And a bailee of moveables cannot ques- tion the title of the person wiio placed siicli things in his care. lb. XXXIII. To Petitouy Action-, US. The defendants pleaded to a petitory action that they held only bv iirecarious title, pleaded ly bv jire and pointed out the real proprietor. Plaintitl'de- murred on the ground that this was not the subject of a plea to the merits, and that the plaintitrhad aright to contest the alleged pre- cariousnessof ihede.' ndaut's tiile— y/c/,7, rniiin- taming the demurrer. Lawlor y. tauchon, 6 Q. L. li, 13, S, C, 187G, XXXVI, Want of Interest. 119, The action was instituted by the plain- titl as cc.ssioiinaire of certain shares in the de- tendants' society to be alloweil to withdraw the amount dueon the shares under the rules oftlit .society. Plea that plaintiff was a \wreprele-nom, and that hchoMs the shares with regard to which he sued the .society as representing another party. 1 he plaiiititldemurred to Ihis.on thegnmnd that la question de droit du demandenr est indHpen- dante et etrani/ire an fait qne cite action soit exercie par lid comme prete-nom, et ne pent motiver auciine exception en droit en ripon.ie d I'action du demandenr : "~llct,t, maimaining the demurrer, Rubillard v, Sorietii Cana- 'i",""x'r ''"''""fMe de Construction de Montreal, 2L,N, 181, S,C, 1879. XXXVII. Want OP Jdbisdiction. 120. A pica wliich inyokes want of jurisdic tion ratione loci must be pleaded by declinatory 503 PLKlKiE. inj! isHiicd n^rninHt the '-flnro reni«r.I on the I 1 t- t„ lul,,. nutici. ol u jilcH ilmt the luit,. I niit iiKTcIv toKivo tluM rt un i,i,|.ro|„.,. ..jU, a, 21 I.. C. .J. hu;, s. c. Irt78. PLI<:i)GE. IV. r.lKN OK Pl.KIKJKK FOR IvXPIl.VSKS. 594 rLKDGE. I. /.I T CoNCKRNINd.* !!■ Ili:i.ivi:nv. 111. I-IAHI1,I|Y OK PaWXIIROKKHS. J\. I.IKX UK I'l.lIMJKK KdU Kxi-KNSKS \ .Mav i.K iiK D|,:,,„ ,^x„ |.|,;,„.^ „^, Action-. V ; •,';*^ J*'^''' ''"'■■' ' "'"« •^'►' A S;.i.K. VII. Ok liiiNiis .Stui.kx. VIII. I'mVII.KOKoK I'LuilUKE. i\. Uionis OK Pr.Kn(;KK. X. Wii.vf IS, sec SALE. n. l)KI.IVt;RV. 121. On the cnntpRtafion of a transfer or pll-ilpMil ,i,,i,ani,tv of lii-ick 31 ihvvs hetiire the in- ^..Ive.ievol llie ,,|e,lj;or-//,7i/, (hut thecnn n t WHS ..nil i;ir want of ,lehve,-v and' |iosses.si,in hy u'oe. Lima!/ '" n; 6 Q. L. Ii. 35, S. C. IJ. tlie |i]e( 187!). in. Ll.VBII.lTV OF Pawnbrokkr.s. 122. .\ i.invnhroker is not liahle for articles pled-cd with in, „ which liavo lieeii stolen fVoni his iimii,>es without any ne-lijrence on his Tp ,/-,""'•!' ''■ ^^i^'oitx, 22 L. C. J. 131, A-N ACI liKSPI.; .-I-INO PHK CONmACT OF Pi^KLOE. .Is.-.,;,/,-,! U, ,il,,/ 0,-r,)A,.,-, ]h7i). hi.cn.l.t,,,- wl,„ has |.«.,.|v,.(l a lUW in t i s , X^^^ tollO 111,. I,iu,l...ll i„ the IM..S088«I, tli,.- ol"3,,s^ owner « 1„.„ , h .anie. wai obtained i, «," .1 k^' ,"■;,« to\,i:s;:;.!it'^i jr:^^'" ""^'^ <" ♦"- ^'^" ^-'« "pp'y lflt'';,.i','.'r."i\l''''' "'"',"','''' ''« a commercial matter, or 14W 1( a tliiii!.; lost or stolen be boiiitlit in .rood faiih In a fair or market or at a ,,nblic .-.ale, or tVon a tr r dealing III Hi„ii|„, articles, lie euiereanno recia i[ paid".:;, j','""""'^"'*! '«> t"« imrchale; u;e"pricl"lfe"'l',a'^ jm. Acfual po^,session of a corporeal moveable bv a A^T-mv ''■;,',>;?:: ';L".™f'''' » presumption onawfiil ti-^n^ AH} iiarly elinniiiig such moveiible must prove besides h . own riKl.t the delects in ,|ie possession "in the me B 'iC^e H on nV P''"'" "' 'i"'''' '' '■""nipt iron; doiiiB ai«- . . I,,,' -..'' '^"'poroal inove^ibles takes place Ssses, I 'i'n'fi.'v :'■''„/''"'■' ('•™K'"'inK f™ni the loss ^t' wlient 11 L e"^ *" posses.sors in good tin I h (oven thel This nrs "^T*"'''''" ''"■" '^"''» "ccusioned by melll Iliis pre.scription is not, how-ver neeeasHi-v fn prevent revei.dication if the till ir have be'" 1-ouBU i mb,i,v„i,g t|,„ ,,„■ ,^,,ig,, ,„, !,„,>' «^ If tie ill ',1^;..^r'b.r"i.":",''*^"T "."'""rity'nf law' U cinnot "i; fmaudaiyi. '■'''""^'*^"'" prescribing byariiclcs 1-3. Iheres|«,i,de,it having' harked a draft oi "'•"Mil.i.-rc,allniveller.da|,p,.|lan|s. which (.|K'llantsr,.|,,„edtnacc,.pl,w'a's.,|,|j,,.,, „! iM'MitNf. lli.;lraveller,,ii,irderl,.seT-„ieli i\ Made over to hin, his samples. 'I lie appellan iav,ntrack,iowledj:c,||ii„|iah,l,tv,a,idp;ofes.s '"".sell wiihii^, u, ,,,iy respondent, sent the sat.ipleHto.Inntreal with i.rdi^s that ',hevw':,'o "'.''/"'"■ '''''vm-d to appellant luiiil the amount '/ ''7" "ml ..,me 811. incurred in i,dl„win,. If tt-audler irnm lliaimord to London, wefe pad. Appellant ret ised to pay the expen.se., -/A.A/.coiit,rn,,n-:tlie JMd.'iiient ol theconrt t'Wnw, tlial appellant was l„mii,l i„ pav the e.x- Kiises incnired hv liis rehisjui; to accept the daft as well as the draft ifseif. AV/„„/„ t V. May iiK OK Dkiit.s and Ri(;„t.s ok Actun. 124. The 13th of March, 1K7I, petitioner sold to insolvent, for $(i,nuu. pavahle in 7 vear-, wit Miteresfat.Sp.c the property at Three R,ve-s kmmn as the " Ijntisfi America Hotel." The deedol.sae conta. I an ti-reemeiit of resoli,. on indelaultot payment ,,f the iiri, e. In l,s7,T he m.-olveni gave a niorl-a.^re ,„ petitioner on Ihe same property „f Si.duo, pavahle on the .same terms as the price of .sale, aiid in, ludin.-a Hiiiiilar stipulation of resolution of the sale in Z^I*r'T'T"- /". ''-'^ ix'titioner trans- le red to the 1 rust .t Loan Co. ot Canada al h s rifrhts under the s-.id .sale and iiiorfa-e. wliich ra.Msfer was duly notified to the assi^-nee <'tthedehtor who had in the meantime fade,! anda,ss,p,ed in insolven,-y. The pefitio.ier hav- itij; demanded the resolntiun of the .-ale and the leturn of the property out of the hamls of the assifZiiee the latter pleaded the transfer to the Inst and Loan Co., when-y/t/,/. reversin.' the .|iult;mentol the court of yi,-,7«,V,//„.s-/,(/»r,"that; Mich transler vvas only a pledjie of the dehts .' Id rights o action m (question, and consent of the pledgee heing ohtained did not ..revent the pledgor, or take aw-f .- from liim the rijrlit to ,h- '«.V/i '"'/' 'r^''"''"'' "'ip"lf l <'e ■or ,11 .■ " 1 ■ . ■, " D'iftlit also siirned an obligation hy which he acknowledged to owe and pro.nised to pay to the plaintiffs in ei-hteen mouths, by instalnieuts, certain kuih.j of inuney I ni .!! 4m ■KB '' I'iil i Slj 4 '11 696 i'LED- «. POSSKSSION. 696 TliP pI«.i<»,(j(fH ajfiiiiioii tlicii' part.bv n ronnlcf »|'f'\'ii.-Tii, ackiiowlivljiiMl tliiii tliclecil ..I «iilc wt** only ni.f'eenril.v C.i' llii-ir cliiiiii-, iin.l Ikmiii t <|l»>m-»-U<^ lo ,, Mill, III,. ctlootH KM H.HI. I- tlicv »««MRi' •* piitiil. N."t Ijciii); (Miid ikM pini i-^eil, ami i(ir -irfri'lant rt>lu.>'iNt! lo ,{vv,\h, It tlicv liitii Mill (111 I,,,, ol rt'Milcrin^ tin- (iliiin- jill'H iili.-dluieK' proprui, rn of Hie clCcins, •■■.ml,- H'riiliint tipllic pliiiiilill- wliirli sliciild Im> carncl out and I'liltilli'd \>y the rctiini ol the tliiriKs at tlie expiration of the lea«c, it the ilehiH, of whii h thp thitit't pleil^ted were the gimrimlee, weic not paid iviid iliseharjied. Caniulii I'ti/iir O, v Can/. 4 Q. L. U. 32;), S, C. 1878, & 10 U. L, 501 Q. B. 187S>. Vir. Of TiiiNOH Stoi.kn. rj(i. A ch'ik pledueil in Ills own name to the phiinlill'-J pjods Htolen tVoiii hin eiiiphiver. He Mas tried aMil_ convicted of tlie thelt.'aiid the pleiifiecr* seized tiie ;;imii|.-i ph'du;ed to them, whieh aiiriiiL'the trial retiiained in the po^xessioii ol the ollicer-fof the Cnjwn. The appelluiitH inter- vened, ami c:ontested lh<. risjlit of theiiledirei t. the goodn. The evidence slioweii (!oii(diiNivelv that the clerk enjoyed consiileraliie powers as alesnian, ami was even allowed to deal for liiinseif in {loods of a similar thoiijiii not pre- cisely the same nature— y/cA/, reversing; the jiidj,'iiient of the court lielow, that notwith- slandinj: ilie words " nor in coiiiinerciul matters generally " in article 22()8 of the Civil Code, the lien of the pledj;ee for advances on stolen i^ckkIs is confined to the cases mentioned in article ]4>*'J- ami, conse,|;:tMii|y tiint the advances not iiavint; •>*''''" made to a trader dealing in similar articles, nor under the other conditions men- tioned in said article, tiie action of tlie res|)oii- dents should have lieeii dismissed. Cassil.s el al. \- Cniirfonl et al., 21 L. C. J. 1, Q. B. IHTC. 127. And .^emblt, that the words •' in coni- niercial matters j^enerally " in said articit were inteiiiied to ci ver other spe(;ie8 of conirnercial transactions, i,!.:)i as pledge, deposit, etc., and not jroods acqiined under other circumstances tliun those mentioned in article 1489. lb. VIII. Pbivileoe of Pi.edoke. 128. Where a watch had iieen given to a workman to repair and lie pawned it— //t-W, that the pawnhioker was entitled to receive the amount hniin fi;ed by iho plaintiffs to cli...e the tran-a<'ti(rii. The (.hin. litN in their demand credited the deleieh.nt with the proceeds of the secniid sale, and llio action was for the balance. The (luesthin ^^.^.^ whether this sale was re;.'ular. The ordinnrv rule with rejiard to (jitiji- i- that the endito'r cannot, in deliMilt of paynuht of the debt,,)!- IMise of the thing privately. Article I'ltlH ,,i li^ Code says that if th" pui'ciiase'- ilo not pav the price at wliich the tiling was adjiniged to'liini, iti coni:>rmity with the conditions of sale, the seller may. after liaving given reuMiimble and customary notice thereof, again expn.se the thing to sale by imction. The court knew no rule or custom which would ju-tify the creili- tor, on the very day the didit beciiine due, in disposing of tlie properly without rea-onal lo notice to the debtor, aii>l perhaps withmii ^ public sale at his /oZ/c cnr/ihr. Umler the circumstances the d'ematnl of the plaintiffs inu.-t be rejected ami the action disniisseil. ViV.va v ER. [j hAW, Abdcctiox. CUASED AT SHKilIF!-'s rOWRRS. d V((. Ok Stoi.kn (Jooi.s not Prook or irAv. I.X. What ih, X- Writ ok. IX. What i.s. 3r.:':,'K% ?";;„■:■•■•'.'' "/■""»'""'. X. WRtT OF li'iL;^' "'■>'"''<•"<«'>■« may nlitajn a writ of u^li.-^i (lie dale ot tfie adjiidieation, provided e move for ( le .anie within, lie vearu da I. irii I the ,,, l.iiien, .„ distrilmtlon. ,SV»v7/ L Knmk k La,i,jl,„s, .t Q. L. it, ^,6^y. ^. ^l Of a«ritol |,„H.es.i„n ^annol olnaiii ,l hefore ';f '"'^ I""' . • "• » t of hi,, adjndiealio I S."("'''rs7H; ""''■^'*' ""■^""''■'•' ■* ^' ''• «. i«'''." toihei;irr'i','"'^f'^'''- '"'''•^«'-" rOSSESSOIIV ACTION-^ec AC- TION. roSTPONEMEiNT. POUR PARLEKS— &e PEREMR- TION, iNTEUUUmoX OK. I'O^/RR OF ATTORXEY— .SVe AGEMl, ATTORNEY, Authouiz.v- TIUN OF. I. By Bank Okkickr, see AGENCY. II. tONVICTlOX FOR WkONOFCI, CoNVERSIOV OF RopKiiTY ixiiKR, see. CHIMIN'Al, LAW ' IV. .Mist UK tii.ti) WITH Action on av Ou- utiATio.N Jmonku by Attorxkv, scc ACTION. POWEPtS. i Or AoKXT, Kee AGENCY. T,!'...?,!''. Uf-i^'iCERfl OK Companies, p^/. f!OM- mk sJlIUOLS. ^«««'««">^--««. *«« COM- PRESCRIPTION, 698 PRACTICE— ^ec I'lfOCEDURE. I. RiiKs OK, Me KCLES OF PRACTICE. PPACTICE COURT. f. PdWKKs OK, .w COrUTS. PRAECIPE-St-e FIAT. I. In Aim'kai,, ,»<« APPEAL. PRATICIEN— .SV« EXPERTS. PRECEDENCE. COL'NSEir'''"' " ^"^'"^•' ''' 'i^'P^EN-S PREFERENTIAL PAYMENTS- &« insolvj<:ncy. PRELIMINARY OR.JECTIONS. I.I.V Elkction Cases, see ELECTION PREROGATIVE. ifl ,^\V.r.7.'?.^"^''^!"':'«N '>■■ Grant IL. vefi APPEAL TO puVv"v Co;:;;;:;^"'" '^''''"'" PRESRYTERIAN CHURCH. I. CoN.STITI'TlONAI.iiv of Act^ „„ TT... se, ACTS OF PARLIAMENT. ^"°''' PRESCRIPTION. I. AOAIN.ST Ar-SENTS. If. AiiAixsT Minors. Ilf. Interrihtiox of. v'.P^,-^""^'*"'' '"' f^ira Rent. > . Of Bii.i.s OK Notes. ^r, *?r.S!;*'*' »-<"' t'ARK OF Anxmals. V III. Of Da.mages. IX. Ok Hvi'iithkc. A. Ok lii.MOVEABLE. '■Jfi 699. PRRSCRirTION. PRESCEIPTION. COO I -i. Xr. Or IxsntANTK Ci.Aiv. A'fl. ()!■ lMi;iu;sr,,s'ce INTEREST. A'llF. Ok Loan. XI \'. Ok I'l-Hi.ic RoADn. XV Ok Kkm'. X\'l. Ok Sciinoi, TixK.s. X\'II. Ov Sthkkts. XVIH. Ok Tanks. XLV. Ok TniiKs, XX. Ok what is Paid iiy Kiuioii. XXI. Ok Wii.i.-i. X.\|[. J'llil.lL' I'OSSKSSION. I. AliAINST AllSKXTS. l.S'). Ill III) acticni in declarntinn of livpotliec the (icH'iiiliinl plfinied infi-v alii, pivscnidiuii of ten vcars wiili tiilc— //<■/,/, iluit us iho plaiiiliir liad lici'ii aliscnt all tlii' iiinc, ami tlic prc-crip- tidii invoUf was prior to tlic C.kIc, tiiat the plea iniisl he .liMiiissi'd. Il6hert v. Memml, 10 K. L. (J, S. C. l.'^TO. II. AdAIXST Mixous. l.'ii) Action in (Icclaralioii of a livpotlieo, for plainlitrs part in tlic price of laml ;ulale(l l.y the law hetore tlie Code, and hv (hat law pi-escnplion did not run a;.Mni,vt iiiinors wiiether iiiiiiTied or not. Jh-hrrf Jx, Meiianl, 10 R. L. (i, S. C. ISTO. l:!7. Ill an action en liechrn/ioii of a hy- pothec ill favor of plaintitr, to which iiiti-r (it'ia the pi-e-cription of tliirty years was pleaded //'-/(/, that under the law previous to, as under the C'«le, the minor emaiicipateil liy iiiarriaL'e could not iii-iiliite an imiiiovealile action without the assistance ol a curator, and that on the same liriiicipic prescrifitioii did not run against minors under such cireiimstances. Jlcbcrlw licllcrow, 21! L. C. .I.:i;ii, S. C. IWTti. III. Ixri:iii!i'i'Tiox OK. l:!H. The phiiiitif!', a merchant tailor, sued the defemlant for !? 7S.7."i, lialance of an account for clothes .sold ill IS.'WiJ.'). and tor wdiich tiie de- fendant on the lirst ol May, IStl", had given a ))roinissoi-y note at a month. The action was hroii^ht lioth on the account and on the note, and allt'geil a special acknowledirment made hv the delendanl ahoiit the Isi August, iMT.'i, and at several occasions thereafler iij) to the date ol the action, which was taken on the l.'iih of tiie f-aine in .nth of Angiisi. Tlie delendant pleaded prescripiion, and the plamtill delerred tlie de- cisory ciath to which the deleiiilant made no respon-e— y/r/f/, that in commercial mailers in which the ainonnl liemaiided e.-iceeds .s!,jil.a pro- mise or acknowleilgmeni sniric'ient to interrupt prescription cannot he proved hy the oath of ihe adverse parly, hut must lie jiroved hv a writim' pigiKM i.y iiim. Fuc/i^ v. Li-ywe, 3 Q. L. U. Ii; C. C. 1871). 1.1!). Action on a note niaile in ISO? for .SIS] an.l (in which payments ha endorsement of payments on a promissory note IS not an interruption of prescription, as the limitation of five years operates as a stalnle of repose which extinguishes the ileht, and iioihimr less than a new promise in writing will sntlice to louiid an action upon. Curon v. Claiilier'i Q. L. U. TM), S, C. 1877. 140. And /(('A/, also, that any endorsement of interest or part jiayment ol principal shoiiM |« written hy the dehtor, and signed hv l„uh parties. — lb. 141. A verhal ackiiowled;rment of a doctor's account miller $'>i) will snllice to interrupt iirc- scription. Jienoil it Jielain/r); C, 6. L Ii I'li C. ('. IS?:!. J > '^ '■ u. i.)o, I 12. The sending of an unsigned account accompanied hy a letter signed hy the dehtor to the creditor is siillicieiit total-" the ca-e out .if the statute cai). (17 C. S. L. 0. Ihir/h,,/ A /iroini ft al., 2\ L. U. ■/. Hi"), Sii. Oi. Is77. 14H. A tender (not accepted) of money hy an iiisiirance company in .settlement of a lo.ss i^inul an interriipiioii of theci,is,>uiicaii/t 2 L. -N. 27, S. C. 1878. 14.) Interruption of prescripiion cannot he proved hy the acknowledgment of an au'eiit who has ceased to he such. I'iiwmnmiilt k Dn- .i'n-j/ni.i, 3L. N. 20, & 24 L. C.J. 100, g. B. IV. Ok AiiuKAUs OF Likk IIkxt. 14(5. Arrears of life rent accrued since the coming into force of the Civil Code are pre- senile,! Ill live years. Lanairc v. J'lwt, 1) R L ill:!, iS. C. 1870. V. Ok lilM.S AXI) NOTKS. 1)7. The appellant sued respondent on a proinis.sorv note which had matured more ilnui five years previously, addiiii; to their deebini- lion, " and has .since Ireqiiently promised touiiv the same hill at various times within the lust five years." The evidence showed that den-n- dant had written iVe.piently diirin.' the live years, .saymg that the alliiir must he'setlled and a-kim.' I.M' delay-//,'A/, that iiotwithstandin.. Art. 22t.( t. C.» Ihat the prescription was in- terrupted. n\dkvr V. Swcc/, 21 L C. .1 '"J 148. A debt originally due under a pmini^- sorv note, and which has heen prescribed by the lapse ot live years from the makiio' of 'such note, cannot he recovereil at law, alilioiigh tlie deleiidant may have acknowledged m the prc- *ln nil tho cnsp.^ niftiitiof-t".! in .I'-tlrlns *'"''i ""iia ""i*! ami 2:ti2 ilic dchr, is lawolim.lv (.'\tin.riii'hei'i''\M'rt'".m EIPTION. COO 601 PKESCRIPTIOX to iimde in ISO? for $]S1 ts liiiil lit'fii Miailf aiiil on- „| 1S71— 7/(7,/, that the iits on a proiiiis.-iurv ndte 1 or |irt'sui'i|itiiiii, lis the I oppi-iites lis ii stiuiite of hi'.s llicdelit, iiihl iKithihj; -e in writing will KnlHue n. Canin v. Cloiith-r, 3 7. that any enilorspiiu'iit of rit ol ijrinoi|ial .-IkiuIiI |je :•, an. I tiiyni'd by hoth vvl<'.ii;iMPnt of a doctor'H f^nlliiic to intrrnipt pre- telaui/ir, (! Q. J,. 1!, i!i5^ an unsiL'iu'd iux'uunt ■ sifjned hy the dclnor to It to till-, llu- can' out C. S. L. 0. IhirliiKi ii I. i(ii», Sii. Ct. i.st;. ii^cplcd) of ni.MK'v tiv an .'ttlciiH'Mt of a Jo.ss IS not iinvonliciial prescription -ilicy. /ii;// V. Jt, II /ford . N. 100, S. C. I87,s: a hiiihler a promise to i made wilhm live vear? '/(■/,/, that iioHvitiiMand- m of live years, that the ained on prunf of snch 'lid V. J'iiisuniu'ciit//, 2 prescription canncjt he Igment of an au'ciit \v!io I'illSlllllK'Atllll ii l),.if. 'UL. C. J. lUO, Q. JJ, LiKK Rent. the ent accrued siiioe p Civil Code are pre- tiiiairc V. Vuijt, 'J R. L. )TKS. upd rospdiident on a nl matured more iliaii IdiniT to their deohira- piently promised tonav times within tlie last u;e showed tliat ijeipn- Pnlly diirinj; tlie live iiir must lie set I led and tliat notwithstaiidiii^T IP presci'iption was iii- Xwcct, 21 I.. C. .1.2'J, due iinder a proini'!- heen i)rpsc,'i|,ed hv the tlie makirii; of 'sw\\ I III hiw, alliionj;!! the lowiedged III the pre- I'lv cxliiiijiiislic'l, and 'no ' lilt" ilehiy fur pri'sci ipiioL HPn.e of a witnpBH alter prpscri|,lion nccrned 'IHU he wa.-st,il indel,ted to plamtiir i„ he amount 01 the note and liave promised to pa • tiust-Pnouncii,. thel,..,elito!,l,eprP-<:ri, ;-n Vr. Of Claim kok Cahk of Animals. 149. The claiin of a farmer liu- tlip care and food ol animals left in his char-p is prescribed Vlf. Of Ci-aim of Sick NfnsK. loO. The claim of a sick nurse for services rendered as such durin-a last illness is pre- fcnbpd undpr Art. 22112 C. C. bv the lapse^ oi one year, ami tbe dpbt bping absolutely ex- inj-'Uished allPr the lap-P of a°vear the court 'is ;"""< 10 take iK.tice of such prescription, hon.h not ,, ea, „d j j„, , y,J,„„,,/,/, ■ ( L. .N. 018, & 2,i L. C. J. U, S. C. 1.S7.S, Vlir. Of Damagls. 151. Inan actionofdaniai:p,s (or a. nnnsi ddit iM^tiiuted more than Iwo years after the wron.' con,pla,,,Pd.,| occurred-yy,7,/. that the action niisi l,e ,i,>misse(|, even in the abspnce of a Sir2i'KT'2;Xs:c;'i«:,--'''^''''^"'- lo2 In an aclion of ,ian,a-ps against thp '■■and Irunk lor conti.nious dan, i;:,. cansed by the JMI I inir n ........ //.)) .1 ., . . W PRESCRIPTION. C02 h-ipspof two ypars a.s laid down bv Arts 22G1 <;2of tl,P Civil CodP-y/e/,/, ovprrulin.'the .b eision 01 .he court below, that alth<,u J fi/e work '^"iMphiined of |,ad been done mor? than to .vpars that the damages „u,st be re.'i d as c..nt,nuous a,„,„ot subject to such | ri^cr , .^f IX. Of Hvi'otiikc. 157. A hypothec beinn- |,„, ,i,p accessory of a I;' .as no e.x,stPncP apart fro,n it, and he e "c- Ihp extinction of thP persona actio i 'v .H'scnption e.xtmguishesat the sam^ ti t e l.p bull, uig a br,dge-y/,A/, iba, the p!ai„.,ll^s couM only rp,.ovpr lur what wassulfpipll wilhin a year prpvious to thp ,iatp ,.| thp action, Cor- P-rat 11.11 „ rn,,„oick & Tin- Grmid Trunk Imihmij Co. uj Canada, 3 Q. L. R. Ill, Q. B. 153. An action of ,iamag<.s for cutting wood on ihp proppriy of another is n.,t snbipct to prc- s;-npli,,n umipr Arts 2250, 22(11 an,l 22(;m of Hip Civil Lodp. Vaiidtlic Aiissaut, I' R. L, •■,17 o. L. IS ( ;), ' 151. Action against spvpral (b>fi.ii,iants for cutting ami carrying away w i |r,,iM land lip- l""gM)g to plamtiir. I'jpa i„t,r „//„ that snch aclion un.ler Art 22(11 C. C. was prescribe,! i uo vpars - y/.A/, Allowing /;„/'„., ,v ')„. Jn-^iic, that thp article in ,p,estioii di,| n,,t apply where the action was lor the value of IH-perly actually carried awav and annro- '•'•'. Inan acti,ni ol , lama-res cause,! bv tlip coi.sirn,:tionola,!an,--//W,/,iliattl,ebuil,lin.'„f ledam being ueiilier a dr/if uov -., i/na.si ddi/ tlip claim (or daimiL'.'s was not subii'd t,, Hie Q:tiri3^;s'^i^:is7;r- ^'■"-■- <'-../.,, liX). Action against the citv of Montreal (or dainagPs cause,! l,v raising the Ipvel of a street 01 uhich p ainlill s ,,r,,per(y was siiinitpd. I'lpa M^' alia tliat tlie action was prpscribcd by the •This ram! is r.>p,irt.. *' •' i•'■'' to appellant arrJaf Hp.lscription..f.,v:;L!!:':;^:;;!;:-',:-::;;;-| -fJ;:;:iS;:;;;i:;;^-,^-';'/-'-'';:--o.^ gage crp,liior, wh,..!. ,1,,, un,loubrP,il ' loay !iavpju-l rights t,, wa-P a.'i nsi ' ' I--U^ .l;-eclain,s are n,,an:.'^''L^, ';:;;::: toapplilory aclion. She ini-ht Inv?.. • 5 'l'''V''n-;pprty,if,|eclai \.'. ^h, he'r' l'-;^l•■"^;, ^l.oul,lbea,ljndg,,.d,,, he. ibiec: to iief claims, Imt no,,,,,,-,. Tl„. ' '' f : H iiilil -;i3ir« 603 PliESCEIPTION. PRESCIIIPTIOX. 1;)0. Tlie kMo^v•lc'll^'e liv a pnrdiaspr of tlie exiHiciicf ol u liviHitlicc; in iho nature of a con- PtitiUnl rent on tin- property ac(jiiire(i, sucli liypotliec l^enifr Ibnnaliv Kel lortli In the deed of acciuisiiion, eoiistitiite.s"liim in bad lailii, and lie cannot invoke the prescription often years; and tlie po-session of iiis widow after iiis death, t le iiniiiovealije havinj; lieen acquired diirin" tlie existence of the coniimmity, ami of his son" under u deed of donation from fiie widow, are o.!i'''''"-,'", ''"','"""' 'It'l''^'-* iilttin & Vatdrin, 2,i L. C. J. n\, Q. ]{. 1H78. 1(1(1. Tliepmcliaser of an ininioveaMe wiiope title shows the existence of certain hvpotiiecs attectiin; it cannot invoke prescription. 10 R. L. 'm, S. C. 11. 18.t Kil. The plaintiff liroiifrht po.ssessory action allejiiiiir posse.ssion as proprietor for twenty Vfiu>—H(h/, that us plaintilf had admitted hy his answer that his possession from 1S47 to lH,5(i was a preearioiis one, and from the latter date to the dale of I he action was that ol iisiilructnary only, that the action was rijihtiv dinmi.ssed. Ji/iiran/ v. Chicoinp, 2 L. N. 2,-'(!, S. C. U. 18"'J. I(i2. Jn an action concerning' property which had leen sold by a ;/nri; de subslitutiim, and to which the tiiirty years' prescription was pleaded —Ihhl, that jirescription could not exist in the face of the adiniiied character of usufructuary in the testator at the time heboid. Gny& Gtti/, 2L. N. IK), S. C. IST'J. XI. Or Ix.Sl-HANCK Cl.AI.M. 111.!. Action on policy of iiiPiirance (o recoyer (or a loss on a lot ol grain which was comiii" down ironi the upper lake.s in July, ls(;;j-f y/(A/, |,rescrihed by live years. Jmu-s \. Sun Mutiuil Insiiruiwe Co., 1 li. L. 387, S. C. 1871 604 XII. Of Inteijkst. 164. Annua! interest arise.s from tlie law and not Irom the contract, and therelbre the pre- seripiinii of interest accriieii since the Co ill the hixikH of W. l3. tries of interest in con- ■; were coiiti lined from It current was rendered lialance due her at that acciMints rendered were 1 acc'iiiiiit current was relerrin;; to it, written iiiit. r. 1). dieil, and in T., her hiishiind and iver lliel$l,;)12.0f<, with her, m;i,~//M,' that lis case, hyaiioii-traiier ^ not a " coiiiiiiercial "ciniiiiiercial nature," question (;ould he |ire- |)se of six years under r hy the lapse of live of Lower Caniida, but of thirty vears. J),ir- .»2,Q. iCvn L.C.J Sii, Ct. 1K77. hedelit were of a coin- iiL' ol the account cur- Tetter referrin;^ to it, roukl take the case out script ion of five vears ■St under Aw. 22;')0 of Canada doe.s not apply n of which was com- aiiie into force, lb. heen used and enjoyed It and others for "iip- < held to he a puhiic !of LS Vic. cap. luO, V. Daitjle, 4 Q. L. K. it to recover the Hum iirs' arrears of fms el ■Kii.it it II, ■e.i) on a lot of diinii;.' tliiit piriod hv iii/ l/i,- Cinirt.—TUere is no doubt that, tiiis is the law ; in liict it is taken almost word (or word from the Code (Art. 2013),* so that we have to see what has been • l!\iil(1pr< or oilier wcirknien nnrt arcliiteet.s Imve n r((?lit ,>t jirefcrpiice over III.) vendor inid all other oiedi- I't'" ""'V "Pon the iidditional viiliie jrivon to the imiiiove able liv their works, provided that an ollioial statement, esia di.-h'iig the >tato of the premises on which the works are to Ih> iiiadi), have been ineviou-ly made liy an exiierl appoinied b.v a jud(re of the Superior Court in the ilistrict and that within lix montl's Ironi tleir completion sue'! works iHve bei'n accepted or rccoivod liv an e.xpert iip- pointed in the same manner, which ncii'ptance and ri>- ceptinn iiiuBt he eslaMi lied by another oflicial stiit-meiit eonlnining also a valuation of thi' work d(.ne; and in no CH-e docs the privilege extend beyon.t the vlni' a cer- tained by such second stat. rnent, and it is reducible to tliM amount of the additional value which the immoveable has at tl.B time of sale. In case the proceeds ar" insnili- cent to pay Iho Iniildcraiid thi> vendor, or iij ^asp.. of C0iHe.,lalioii, the iidditional value (jivei, hy f e hnildiUKS Is establi>^hed by a lelaiive valuation effueti-d in the nniii. iier preacribud in the t'odu of (Jivil I'roucdure. a013 CO done, and whether the law has been satisfied I he proceeding was a slovenlv one, no .hmht' but the second ;/)v»-f>.v-mV;f(Zlia"s lobe con irne.l tiiirly, as the learneil judge below has do ,e \\ e therefore contirm the judgment. Laiiin-i/lr k Lccouvs & Kelly & Dcsmarteau, S. C. U Ioi7. V. Of Cakrikrh. 1S3 Conservatory attncliment of a rniantitv o( lumber. In his atHilavit the plaintiff aliced that the spriiii: and siinimer previous he crm- veyeil the said lumber at his own co-ts and charges down the two branches of the River ^icolet and its triluitaries to the moiKli of that river, according to a notarial agreement made with the delendaiits. That the amount of tim- ber thiis conveyed was 'j;{,8-!;i pieces, at the rate, acc'irdiii;.- to the agreement, of five dollars pt-r 100, the whole amounting to tlie sum of ^bfiUb- 1"), which the delendaiits, by the said agreeineiif had undertaken to pay, ,«!2y0 in commencing the work and afterwards in proportion as the work proceeded less twenty-five jxr cent., which ivas not to be paid until the whole work was rinisli- ed ; liiat lie hail also done similar work on the Kiver Scott, and not included in the a<'reemeiit amounting 10 .|!3(; ; that he had furnished 200 floats and 300 crossings ainouiitins toS3(IM, and spent S2.T in conveyini.' them ; that he had sui: tered damages to the extent of $1,000, maki'i.^ in all $,3,8(i3.15 ; that thedefendants had refused to furnish the money necessary to convey tht timber, as they had agreed to do, and that the plaintiff had received onlv 52,000 alto.'ether leaving a balance of §3,81)3.15; that, further,tlie delendaiits were carrying away the timber, which was plaintitrs .sole security for his claim] and were refusing to recognize" the claim of plaintiff for the balance ; that without the benefit of a writ of .v«/.v/V; arvet simple in the nature of a conservatory writ of atlacliment to seize 111 the hands of defendants all the limber thus conveyed, and which wasstill at the month ot the River Nicolet, in order to preserve his lien and privilege thereon as n rniiniioii oiiiiir or r r>Hii)i:ur he wor.M lose his privilce and his debt and sustain damaL'e. Petition "to i|uash on a number of grouinl.s.— 7/fW, that the right of the plaintitf was the right of a ilcniitr I'liiijtcur according to the usage of the country, and that he could, according to Art. 83-1 of tiie Code of l^rocedure, seizeanddetain them lur the costs and charges of <;onvevance, but not lor damaires ; that he had also the rightof a carrier to retain ihe timber until paiil the costs oftran;reoin('iit inade lat tlie niiionnt of tim- ,«■!.') ))iecos, at the rate, enf, of five dollars per !to tlie Hum of$l,f)lu.. Ii.v thesaiil ajtreemeiit, loO in coiiiiiiencin;; ih? iroportion as the work ' \ier cent., wliicli was i'iiole work was tinish- e sitnilar work on the nled in the ajirceniont, he hail furni-hed 200 rnonntin2 loS.'iflM, ami em j that he had siil- nt of $1,000, making ielendants had refused ;e-Harv to convey the '1 to r to Art. l^;itof tiie iildelain them lor the ifeyanee, hut nut lor he riirhtofacarrierto thecosts iiftranspurt le Civil Code,* that in t to conservatorv pro- and that theatii lavit that piirpo.ie. 'rrwk C. IS7I. ? master and crew of I he last voyajre does ■.ages tor a season's iiln tlip filing tinnsport. !5U or freight of It, 1679 fiOD PRIVILEGE. contmiiou.s navigation on the St. Lawrence and lakes although the master and crew sii^ned articles lor the season, and were paid hy^the month and not liy the trip. D'Aonst v Mr- IH5. 'J'he privilege upon vessels for furr.ishim' a shm on " her last voyage" does not apiily to supplies furnished during .he whole sea.son of navigation, though the vessel be one makini' short trips on inland waters. Owens d al \ Inioii Bank; 1 L. N. 87, S. C. 1873. VII. Of Hotel Keepers. 18G. An innkeeper can exercise liis privilege for food ;;iid acconimodalion furnished to a guest upon eflects brought into the hotel liv such guest, though not his propertvand not lormitiff liart of his baggage. Fuber— .ffei(/, contirm- inj; the jndpnient of the court helow, that the proceeding was valid, and the exueplion to the liirin hied hv appellant wai properly disini-i«?(e/c. Muthew.ion v. (/Beilly, 2 L. N. 322, & 23 L. C. J. 313, S. C. 1879 ; 207 C, C. P. V. Bill of Particulars. 202. In an action of damages against a lessee for deterioration of the leased jiremises the de- fendant cannot bv motion demand a detailed statement of the damages charged, but must do so by exception to the torn), li/idaume & I'au- neion, 9 R. L. 594, Q. B. 1879, VI. Calling in Party Interested. 203. In a revendication of a piano the defen- dant pleaded that the piano still belonged to the EDURE. 612 613 rilOCEDUEE. lip court l)ploK-, that the iiiid tlie excopiidii to the I wa" properly disiiiis-ied L.N. 32, Q.'B. 1877. lainages— //)*/, that an lie peniiitted alter the ition to the I'orin. Im- R. I.. f,7H, C. C, ISSO. iiemleii declaration nuist dant before he can he Fair v. Cassils, '?i L. N. the (brm was main- idcd writ was not served Pibrc return of action, r. 238, S. C. R. 1881. itl'has ohtained perim'g- iiiended declaratinn on icasioned by the aniend- he costs as taxed by the lit to permit hitn to tile II, and a demand in re- i judge doe.f not suspend :/„„l to give notice to (.laintitt. < 'halut V. U,;y^.d„^21I..C.J.2l8.S.C.l87™ -m. Motion for conge dejml and costs on mo ois winch had been served not mad ?L"N:3^2:y'iri^r" ^-"'-^'--^ 207. Where a motion for con,,i defaiit was not n,ade until the lift), day after retun'/ no co-N 34'rTs t'."lH80. *'''"^"' ^ ^^'"■"""'^' ^ '' ^• i^^J^L-^ r'l'''^ "^'^'"'Z' '^•■'""o' ^ obtained by the delen, ant, except he returns into court the opy c, the writ and declaration served upo c. c. 18^0 ''''"■'■ ^' ^"''"'"J'''' « ^- ^- ^i- ;in, 201). And lie must at the same time pay the VIII. Consent. 210 Where the attorneys of a garnishee agreed that a petition in interventio,, tiled in c. -e be con.s,dered to have been .served upon 1 im (tno garnishee , and afterwanis revoke,! tlie consent-y/eA/, hat the revocation ha no validity until jiermitte.) by thecourt after notice IX. CoUXSEI, AT EnQUETE. ins^.'rii.eVf''''" ""/'' promissory note. Being n u il.e,| or enquetc, the parties contented them" set es Hith an adnii.ssio,, of certain facts si.r„ed by the attorneys of tlie plaintiff ,u,d tl,eco,r, se at ~, of defendants, and cuunlersigne. by th, attorneys ol the delt'ndants. The actior «^« dMiiisse.. with costs. The prothonot'n iu mg relused to i:rant a lee lor the defemlants' cuunsel at ai.jiu-l,', the delendams appealed on lie taxation of, Ik. piothoiu.aiy.aiVltliei, pieten.~.iun was mumtaiiie,!. C„rp„n>/i„i, of (Jn " " I"',''""" to annul a deed of trans- fer the part, e.s have a right u, have a counsel be ia.\e. a ^10, as n, onjmary ca.se.s. I'ifoi, ""■<■, 4Q.L.R.i|,y,s. C. 1878. filed of v'.;" 'Tl""."™'"^'' "{■'' '^""""fl at c,ic/„el, med 01 lecoid gives a right to such couu/el to i'KOCEDflJiJ.]. ,5,4 tlie fee of ten dollar-, all.med bv tb,. . umIK eilallb^lbi g''r"^r,,;:.;i!;fi::';v'- '7- ''''''i -/''^/.didn^tae. ti^ui :'/£';;:■' ^''f'- XI. Dki.ai-.s i.v. «,w f' ''^ T'''' ",'"''■'■ ""■ '-f^'f"- '"1,1 l.e-ee Art ;.■., „,,„,■,„.. ,i„. ,„•<,,„,„ „,",";•,;;,,"£ e,m„l,i, 21 |,.c. ,1,3,1, """.'>"■_ t.ir'.iT v. -il. Wliere le I eleiiilaijt ■iC,,.-. ii »f ei„i,t ,1.,, rh„„ .'",;, i!;;-M«i»ii.». =s;s;;— T„;ii:^r""-'- cj^|t. Boula-i..e v. //.6«..:2 l/N.^iJ!'^";?: of|itP:t'S,,^(:V;.S--;-ofawrit v. Bomlmrdier, 2 L N. 202 .S C Ly'V ''^ «Sia::i:Saii-s:;:irs^^^ tendants, and (biv-dos „■,.,!,, .'i ,,''*'''' j'^- closure in the ease in,,,,,: , '" '"''t "it' tore- lieddat,,ry exception was ,|,s,.„. ■ ' V", ' awiiKSt tie Hi o^- ' ;'' 1 '«, benutlt ot a default >ritlic,,.s ruio,iiM,,VH ''" '^'•';:'''"-K«l tioni llie suit him. 82 CO P^ copy of the writ eervoU upon d,;,':'?. "t-Vr-Zr""""' '^ ""'y "- intermediate otJ,ii;,^:XJ'V^'i;i,5'-'';;i,;';^v;j'-r ..v excp,,,,, I IM.ara»ce,exce(,t i„ theca" 'o ;^, V, r,' "i.'/'VT "l--' "I'- I d--'l«y>N,Mi'.' i are not tiled witlnl, til,. tl,iU ,u,v V, , "'■• '""' '' "'ev I days, ltie,,r,,ll,,,notary na\ Bra t.i, 1'"'''*-' -'"fiiiicnl cale of foreclosure, f J7 (J Vi" "'" '''''"'^"l h certia , I U 4 m MM 615 PROCEDURE. I JOCEDURE. 616 u ( 1- i 1 i 1 i j X(I. Depositions. 22.). Ill/ SU'imiiraithij.- Whore (loposiii,.ns (ire tiikfii liy II ^l|(lrl-lllull| writer without a written ... .1. 1 .. iiiiuiii, tt, \\ J iLit^n ciHiserit, l.ut liotl) parties have piirticitmted with- "' " ' liiMiiiil liy tliein. out olijccii.iii, th'ev will h(^ A'o,v.v \. McGUlimii/, 1 L. N. 77, S. C. iH77. XI ir. Dki'osit.'^. ^24. Where money Imd lieen temlered to Jiliviiitill'liy im intervening partv, and deposited inLMiirt, and plamliir ii„,ved I'o he ulhnved to witiidraw w.— 11,1,1, that he eoiihl not do so, as the tender was a conditional one /Vm' v nil/,,,, k Beard, 2 L. N. \'X,, S. C. 1879; 54;t XIV. Dkhcription (IK Pahties, sec Ex- CEl'TIONS. 22.5. An action in which the occupation or quality of tiie delendanl is nut 1,'iven will he dis- missed on exceptiini to the form, hnt without costs. Jjuol V. Chnitier, (i Q. L. K. tian names and indi- cates the others hy thcr initial letters, the action Will he dismis-ej on exce|)tion to the ioriii. a,j„tliii;- V. Cilhii/.'iKii, ;i Q. L. R. ;W4, o. (". IS77 ; 1',) C. C. P. 22,S. Wi.eiv the deliMidaiit-^, a hanking corpor- ation, were descrihed in the writ a- carrvini: on "the traile uml husiness of iKinkinir, in the citv of Montreal, in thedistrict of.Montreal an^l cise- "''";;''■ ''—ll'l'l^ -ullicient. liii,;'„,i k rini l!,titk oj li. A. AiiM-ica, 21 L. C. .1. 2iil, Q. B Isr; . 4!) C. C. P.f 229. Where a plaintiff in his writ and decliir- ation gives his chriKiian name as "Thomas" proof that he sometimes signed " Thiimas .l'-' and sometimes ' Thomas" is not sutlieieiu i,, siipiiort an exception to the form alleging' tlmt iQ:Lir3S:'Q.''i;'."i;i^r' ^^'"•"•^•'^■'"y. 2.S0. The description of the defemlant in a writol summons shonhl give the actu.il re-^i ;lpnce and not the domicile. Martd v. ,V«/ife,/ 22 I.. C. .1. 107, C. C. 1878. 2;J1. Where the initial only of defendant's cliristian name is given in an affidavit f,r ''l'/',','"' 'b" '^ ii«>;ruiind forapelition to(iiia-li //((// v. /iirnir/ioii, l Q. L. l{. 2li8, 8. C. l87,s ' 2.f2. Tlie failure to state in the writ the plain- tifls names 111 full, and the giving a wrong name to defendant, are not mere irregularities suhjn.t to amendment, but nullities, and cannot ho amended. I'areut v. Picard, 4 Q. L. U. 7;)^ 2;i:!. Plaintiff -.vas described in the lease on winch the action was ha.sed as " Henrv S .Scott " without any indication of the name' lor whu'h the "!5. stood- //,./7, on exception toihefonn, lliat he could maintain an action in ihe mune specified m the lease without any further de-i r- nation of Ins second christian name. Scott v J/m;/,/, 4 Q. L. R. 215, S. C. 1878. 2;i4. A debtor being sued by a wrong chrisiiun name, and allowing judgment to go against hiiii cannot afterwards oppose the seiy.ure of Ins things on the ground tliat he is not the ner-m against whom the judgment was rendeiri Macfianis li,mk of Cmada v. Miirnhn n L. C. J. 215,8. C. 1878. ' ' 2;i5. On exception to the fbrm— //,V/ tint the iianies " lili/.a Betil," by which the female plaintiff was known and called at the time „f her marriage, and by which she was entered in her marriage certificate, coupled wuh lier designation as the wife of the otiier plamliif wiio was projierly named, are a snflicient siale- inent of her names under Art. 49 of the Code of 1 rocedure, * altiiongh she was baptized bv the names of- Mane l...a Betil." I'ullM v. .SW„, o Q L. R. 32u, 8. C. 18/9. 2:iil Wh'M-e in an action qui fain the .Muni- ciiial Corporation to whom one-lialf of the line was due was describe,! i„ the declaration as the • Jlumcijial Corporation of "_//,,/,/ dm llie term " municipal " as used in the Miiiiieiiial Code IS a term of general description, and not |.art of I he tit e of a corporation. Gni/uim o. Monssctte, o Q. L. R. H4(J, C. C. 187'J * Monovs paid liitoconrf cannot, witliout tfieaiitlinri;'a- tinndftli.. (MMirt, ho withdrawn by tlie parlv who paid tlKMiin. t nl.s.tholeMh.ri, ,.„.,di;h,iml, the | arly to whom It i> iiiii.i,. H (MitiUed m nwio. tli,. im(iiicv< paid n winmiit piejndiciug liia claim lo ihi. reiuaiiider. 6M t The writ nuist state the names, tlie occupation or q.mlil.v a.ul tli.; domicile of the plaiMtilf, and il, ..,",„,?.' and a.dual r,.Mdeiice of tin' delenda.it. In aclion. upon v. ;l'■^'r ""'">",'", l"''""i-^'^"ry nolos (oranv otiier pri- yate wntmfjs, whelher nenoliahle ( r iioti, itis ►ullii.i'.iit to irive the iintials of the chrisliaii or Hist nanus ot the delendanl, such as tliey on' v rilteii upon s,,,.!, hill.s. notis or ,Ms,™,„.,„t<. \vi,e.> a co,-,-..,™),. l,ody i.s ",:,',„ the suit, It is Butficlem toil. sort its corporate name nuU to indicate its iirnicipal place of business. 49 C. C. l\ Act to A.MKND Aut.4!)of the Code of Civil I'UOCKDUUE. Ass,;Hleil In :n,'.Mf.h»"' ■*''"', ""•a'!v;'=>' andconsent of the iji Kisiatuie ol Qiu'liec, enacts as follows ■_ h„ . i ■'■ :'"}, ^'"'•■"'leol (;ivil I'rocedure is amended Ivonls":"*^ to the secou.l paiasrapl. thereo, the tollowhig " irthedefVndant lias no domicile or permanent r,.*i. wiil'^.l!l«' M 'hr'h"\ "■'■"'''''''''' "f '■'' »^^'"^^^^^^ rev d ,1, f ,,: '"^'Vi'"" """"' '■;"""" I"' "--^'Ttaiaed. ,.,,.■ '"■'/,','" be otherwise siillicienlly designiu,.u in the » nl, and that such writ be served npji, 1,1,.^ i^!;.;!,!,. saf.ctioir. '^*^'' "'■"" "°"° ''"" ''"'■'^'' "" "'« ''"/ of '« * ride Note. ilDUIlE. 616 G17 TROCKDURE. tr in luM writ ami docliir- iM iiaiin" as " Tiioiiiii**," IPS Hjj;ne(l "Tli.iiiiHsJ.- lUH " iH not Hiillk'ifiit til u the liiriri allet;ini; thai inicrt. Ileum k Mul„i,i/, ^77. ■■' of the defendant in a M iiive the aoHiil n-i- cilo. Martel \ . tiiiiiicuL 878. iai only of ilefeinlant'.t I'n in an allilnvit fur il lor a pet it ion ((Minasji li. H. 2(i8, S. C. 1878. ate in the writ tlieiilain- tlie giving a wronj: imnio 're irregularities suhji^t illities, anil cannot' liu I'kard, 4 Q. L. U. 7,j_ scribed in the lea'e on leiias" Henry S. Scott," of the iiiiine' l.ir whicli n exception to the form, an action in ihc name tliout any furtlicr iIi-It. istiaii name. Scott v i. C. 1878. led by awrongchri.-itiiin inent togougain.-'t him, jse the .sei'-iure of |ji.-i at he \H not tlie person igtnent was iviidercl. iiuula V. Afurji/ii/, 23 the Ibrni— //,'/./. lliat " hy which tlie li'Miiile called at the nine of lich she was entered in c, coupled Willi her of the t)ther plaiiitiiF, I, are a siillioient slate- er Art. 4!) of the Code die was baptized liv the ■til." I'oitliot V. Siiln, '■). 'in qui f(im the Muni- 'III one-half of tiie line the ileclaralidii as the of "—ILI.I, tliiU used in the Miiiiiei|ial il ilescription, and not poratioii. (ii-akiim o. i, C. C. 1S7U. I' riiK Code of Civil i:i!n. f (>'•'., 1S79. 'ndvico iinii consent of tlie ts lollows :— 'il I'roeeilure is iiirKMiileJ apli lliei-eoi the (oll.nving niloiln or iKTinuiioiit ri'.utV |,v ,|,„ „ |, o aX::;"nr''r"'''W'''^'''^'''''''i>ianmiw;s a cili/en ol ih,. 1. n,|,„| st,ues, and si ,di title was mi^ninvn^ther... Jir..U.,k L„,„„, :i I't^i^ll ns An action in whi.di the defen lain was described, as " Lisa lilanchard " was d,si i " ,1 onexceplH.i, ,,Mbi.t;,riM,,n,pn,,i(,|,it he iiu 1 (ailed Lizzie in her litrnilv. Lanntich,' \- 2.!!i. And, /„•/,/, I hut beini' an ae'tion of ibi ".ages I, wiiuld i„„ ,,„ pern.iued to e' , „ ; hiSn':.' r "'■'•'"'' ''"^'''''"'i''" '''»'•'• ''-'^ iliiUion ol the e.xcepiion to the Ibrm. Ih. PEOCKDUIIR. 018 for its rejection, citing An. 2n,-. C C P— //,/,/ coiihriiiin^-thedeciHiiiioftheciiurl below, that lie oppiiHiion was null bv iv.as,,,, ofil,,. i,',. ., u iariHe- relerrei I,,. />.,/„,i v Do,;,,, I I, H..^.-,^^22L.c.J.l(;2,sTl^l^7^' XIX. i;.\(i:i'Tiox3. XV. Dksistk.mknt, tice CO.ST.S. 240. A party may desist from an interlocu- tory ,udg,iiei,t rendered in his favor ev ter notion lor leave to appeal from such iud.'i en I"; iK'en graiite.l, .ml without the Cie of eopp,.i,epar,y; and in such case the appea Hill be dismi.ssed witii coitioner ■ v „ proved his pernio,, was entitled to a juibnnei,] on It. Fo,;l V. S/,o,'/, 21 J. C. J, 1.1)8, b. c:l,s77. XVir. KsqVKTK. in?/t't H,r'''-' ''■^'■' •'''"« for e,Hi„t'ie and hear- nig at the .sime fine will Le sustained in Ins other -ide has on the same dav inscribed lor ^i/».7.,n the ordinary way. lio.ryoui,,'^ n,^ 245 l!n„.s,rl,,Uo„jo,;„fUr D,IH>tfd.-\V\wiv M^tw,'"T/''~'^'''''"''' •''' '"otion of plain- tiff, alter Inial hearing, i,, order that they i,„..hi reopen tiieir r,/,/,/,^/,- //,/,/, that a rem en orrtei to get the case re^rnijjrjy on tlie roll />,-- Mc G,;ffi„, ■, L. X. ;,2, X 24 L, C, J, Sl.'s. C. XVIII, EinsiiiK.s AXD Notes. 24«. An opposition a/in ,!,',!;. a numb ler of eras c Contained ures and marginal notes not referred to or approved. Tlie pi 217. /),/„,//„ /.y/,..-.Apj,eaI from a iud-ment ot the .Superior Court at 'renvl,„i,„e ,••:. i, an except,,,,, to the ,;„.,„. The actloi ^i ^'^ * ( (11) damages, and was returned on the 27th ApnI. (-)n the r„l|„wii|. dav the del, ,,1.;;, ' '''■' ''^'M'lfaraiice, ,.nd 1,11 the loiirll, dilZ^^^^ ;:"l"|-ntl,edelendai,ls tiled an exce i, V. '•"•'" '^' ''^'"-l-st fmrinihe alt :, .'"on "lotion to ivject both appeaivince an evi.th, as irregi.hirlv tiled the"n,otii,„ wa '^ i , ' ' .o l'^' exception by the Superior^ ',. ' J'-'lTeb,,,,,,,., |,|,t reveived in ai,i,eal ,l f^round that there w,ts no rule ',? le .e '^ '1 urmg „ ti, be served before foi ,■ o . ', ,, , K''t.tlPl^7f^'''''''''^^^'--'^-^ 218. Deposit «!////.-[„ cases under sivtv dol- e ■,;;:;,;'''""r, '^''-'i"''"'^ -^i' p-iHi;ma;l ■./„•,•«-'"• '^ -• ''• '- -*''2. C. C. 187.S -'•'• hinee the jiiri.sdiction of the Ciivolt <^ourt 111 (Quebec and Montreal ,a. e, •esneted to .^1 01) no deposit is ivm i ed wi IMvli'iiiiiary pleas in that court. AV,, ,,,/, \ /, Aou,o„. :>, Q. I,. It. ;.-,x, C. C. 1877 •' .01). l)il„U„n.-\ dilatoiy exception, „„ ,i,^ g^|m,,d niat tlie money sued f.r was „ ,a,|v ^^'pi^^t'A ^^•^^"'"'•""'w.o./„;:':i 251 A dilatory exception will lie inimded „>, ac.i^87{;;;;',rt/^r'^^'-'^i' j'-i^-i^2, 2.32 /Vf//»,/m„-y._Fili„^, pleas p, the ,„e,.its '- "lot a waiver of a ,H'eli,;,in,u-y cmv ti ,n where there ,s a special reserva.ioi, l,v del ■ , • ,"1 ol^h. prelnnnia^ ,deas. y V.../ V. jj^t!;!: 2,5;). Exception to the forin will lie wl,e,-e a declaranon is nisniliciently liUdled. Suit Ciroii, 1) it. [,. 7i,s^ Q j}^ |-^-- '"■!/ '■V 2,,4. The name of respondent was "Thom.w .1. atid no,'-rii,„„H,s-asiuthe wit , , '^■! ''■"■atioii-//,,/,/ continuing court below ,t this was no such a misnomer as to found a, ev. 4;i! (^1!.' IS 77'"'"'" ^^"'"'" ^ ''^"'""'^' ^ ^' ^• 255. Where on & .mi.v,' ,/,i,;er!,i ,„„■ ,h.„it ,/,. .»//«tl,e«,,W.«,.,,..,.obi4a:d,l,iA|,e, s li c bed by his initials only, and il wa- ,.|. ;„ hat he had signed tlie;„v,.,^., ,,,•/>.,/ in ihatw' v thee«H.|,,,,.i^wasdismis.ed, IVil.,,,, & n^yt'/, 250, WhJre the defendants objected bv ex- ception to the lorn, to the manner in which thev were described in tl ■ ■ ■ ■ "'"ca but that the e> le w^ritaiid deid.-iruti did Hot j;ive their proiier ilex^'ipti laintitf jnoved | Dimniiuj ic Girouard, 9 !{.],. 177', q. '] ■ . /Idd, :ception was properly dismi.ssnd. ' 1877. ill -( « - i' : It I, 'I 'llil 'I'll if Id 22 61!) PllOCEDURE. PROCEDURE. 020 XX. Exiiiiina. 257. In ixn action on a foreiirii jmlirini'nt to wliicli cuiiiilH ill ftHMunipsit wt'roaililcd, till- [iri)- cffiliii^IH on Miotiiin (if ck'fcniliinl were (inlcrcil to lie >l»Vi'(l until ii .Mlaloincnt of accminl wiih lilc.l. J}(j/mc V. Cannils, 21 L. C. J. '.is, S. C. 1H77. 'i.'iH. In an action for ri^'lits of puccoffion — Jtdil, that iiiiilfi' a plea of ;;eiicial (Icnial nifre- ly llic ili'liniluiit could not (ilo a copy of a notmial qiiillunvc. C'adiettx v. Cadihix, 2 L. N. 11)1, S.C. 1S7I). 2M. Art. !();{ uftlic Code of Procedure, wliicii provides that until the cxliihits are produced and tiled the pluintitl cannot proceed with ills action. IS ineonipiitildewith the 7lh itule of I'rac- tice ot the Circuit Court, which provides for the cerviee of a detailed account with the action, and has conse(|uently aliroii.ited it. JJelaiiycr V. Vhalljoiix, U K. L. 447, C, C. 1878. XXI. E.\1'.A.HTE. 2G0. A writ of fieri facias which has been stopped by an oppo.sition to annul in a cause, the record of which has been lost by the Quebec Court House fire, is not an cxjiai'le \no- ceediii;:, even though tlu> juili;rnent was obtained expaiic, and that consei|uently theplaiiitiirean- not renew his proceedinj; under ,sec. 5 of t^. ;{7 Vic. cap. 1,5, but niiisl obtain the restoraticju (d' the record, or procure leave to proceed under section 7* of that Act. Jiuucltard v. Dawson, 4 Q. J., li. 282, S. C. 1878. XXII. Faits kt Autici.e.s. 261. A party has not tlie right to examine his aiiversarv sur J'aitH el articles belbre trial. Kiidx V. Lajlcnr, 1 L.N. 470, A; 22 L. C. ,1. 225, .S. C. 1878. 2l)2. And where the plaintiti has inscribed the case for proot and tinal hearinj;, a notice served by deltndant upon the attoriu'y of his absent adver-ary two days before the" dale li.\ed tor trial and' lor failK el articlen on tlie day of trial is m time, lb., A- 221 C. C. P. 203. Hut when (he attorney of an absent party, upon whom an order lor fail.'t cl articles has been serveil, indicates the residence of his client, and hi.s ojition to have hint examined by commission at such place, the commission will be at the dilii^'ence and expen.«o of the jiarty re- quiring the interroi:atories. Jb., At fKiii.s. 273. VVhere a party lia,! been allowe,! to plead inform,! ]t,n,t>eri.'< m th,. court below, she was allowed to inuoee,! in fonmi paiinenx in appeal without a mw ailidavit. T,Lt [i- Loan t(*. iV Quintal, 3 1.. N. 31)7, Q. H. Ls.so rROOTDURE. 622 274. A deleiida It wli,) Kecks to 'lave the 1 ■ ii" I "" "'o^n lo lave til pKiintitt H leave to plea,! in forma /rtiiiim.i ri yoked IS notertitle,! to ask lor the 'lismissal of he action. G'linanme s . Cil,, of Montreal, 3 ^\^- •*'?• '^' ^-^ ^- ^- J. ^58, S. (J. 18,-,U. 270. Jhe permissiun to pW'tiMn /ormu pan- perix includes the privil,.gc of having iJu. ,!'fei,. dai:ts depositions taken am! tiled without iiav L. N. 373, S. C. 1880. XXIX. In Intervention. 276. Where an iiitervenant having foreclosed he other parlies from plea,ling to his interven- tion, and obtained ju,lgment exiiarte without adducing any proof of the allegati,.nH of his iiilerveiit. ,11, the judgment in review was .set aside on this ground, and on the ground that, it he ,lid not intend to furnish anv further "roumis HI supp,,rt of his interveiition,"he ou^lit to have given notice to that ette,-t to iilaiiititr )/,■- Greeri/ A: Ginyras& Cute, 4 Q. L. 11. 203, S. C. H. 1870. XXX. Inschiption. 277. A case may be inscribed for enquite et mcnte without the tiling of articulations of tact and answers, when the delav for tiling these has expired belijre the date ol'the inscrirr lon. Bella!/ & Quay, 4 Q. L. R. yi, Q. i. 18(4. ^ 27,S. Am! an interlocutory jiidgment rejectiii" such inscription is a judmnent from wh'ich an appeal will lie. lb. 27y. The plaintitr had given eight davs' notice todelen,lantof his inscription lor enimeti; but had not filed the inscription within that time. On motion-//,./,/, insufTielent ami S '('• 1877 "'"' ^'""''''"•'■. 21 1-. C. .1. 39, 2-^0. Notice of-h, the Circit Court, non-a.r pealahle, where the lu^ioii has been re'urn.'d iii va,ation, the notice it inscription for proof and leann.r „„ ,|„, „ .j„ ,„„,, ,,^. .^.^,_^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^ three ,lays belorehnml. even where HU,.i, „„tice Q.T:^H,t;r(^ ,^:"'-,/v^^'-* v. ve ..4 281. /V //,•,/)•//(,/. —An inscription f,,r hear- mgcanm.tbe (il,.,| „,„i| ,|„. , p,^ |„^, ,,„,,,, lormallv ,l,.,.|are,! clos,.,l. lir,,r,i,r \. Orand ll''l''c ']"')-{' ^^''' '•'^' ^-'';"'"'"' 2 I" N'. 323, Jt 2f<2. A delcnilant f„reclo-e,| from picadin.' .■ai,n.,t ,ns,)ril,,. lor .,,y,,,Ve. llnuin, vl A'.cv, 3 ix.>. Motion lor leav ,, ajipeal from a iu.b'- meiit selling as,,],. p|,in,,iii-s inscription n.r e7i- 'IKclr. J !,(. u,.,i„„ was met bv an e.\cepti,,ii to ilielorm turning on a matter of recrd ,,nlv Ihe plaintiir.icmaiided deleinlant's pleas to the mem-, th,.,lHendant,li,! not plea.l am! wa- tore- close,! i I,,, plamtill then ins.iribed lor no,i,rte i;JCf,artb J he m,,ti,,n wast,, set asi,|(. this in,scrip':,)nhecaiise tlie preliminarv pleas sj |,1 le dispose! of belore the case on the i its It wa< also conteiide,! that the ins^ripii,,,, rx- parte was irregular as the enqnite shoiihl |,ave i'een general. Appeal alloweif. I'acand k Cor- KrB.'tt:''"'"'''^'''^-^'^''^''^'^^'-^*- XXXI. Judge's Order. 284. All ,ir,ler at the foot of a petition sh-ued Ijy a.)n,lge,lescnbe,l i,, the petition as bcinTr i,, the district will be presume,! to have been fji"*'" "1,"'"J 'ii^l'-'*;^. Hoy V. Fraxcr, tj, L. H. n-i, a, (^. 1877. XXXII. Jl'diciai, Oath. 2So. The Court of Review mav sen,! a case hack to the court below in order"that iheimli- cial „ath be referre,! to plaiiilill-. Canadian Aariyation Co. ii McConkey, I L. N. 23, Q. B. 28ii. When the juiliciarv onth is ,!eferred bv tlie court the parlies will be hear,! anew if ihe'y desire It. Syndics de St. Henri v. Carrier, 4 y. L. R. 205, S. C. 1878. ' XXXIII. Mi8 EN Cause. ♦Be ore anRwerint; a dilatory exception or any other pn'liin nar^ plea liU.,r, llieplainliir mi, ■, if I,pi „„k "tK> excuptioii i« Hl,.d solely in „rdor iJ r.ta rd tie su t require tiie defendant in writing to plea.i to tl.e ineri s and may foreclose him if kucIi , lea loti e ni./r is is i loi fllM witlm, eif:ht day. (Tom ti.e .1.^m,i,„i iliere™ ., , l.r r ".Y" '" '',''"" '*''*"' cognizance of no other 287. A person to whom leased premises have heen sublet contrary to the stipulations of the original lease may, in un action in resiliation, be ///;.v en canse by mere service and notice of the aciioti, lilteaunie & J'anneion, 9 H. L. 504 y. B. 1879. ' XXXIV, Motion. 288. Neither a demurrer nor a special answer in hiw can be tried on motion. Canadian Hank oj Commerce & Brown, 23 L. C. J. 181, (^. B. 1878. j pruoi. Zoo C C 1*. !'li 3 "I HI (}2:i i'liOCKDCUK. PROrKDIIRK. 02 1 H :, 2x:t. A writ iif NiiiiiriKiiiM in tlip niitiirp of a Jiroliil,irii)ii ciiiiimt Sc <|iiu.'77. -WW. XoTI.K. 'J.*\l. '>/■ .l00. li'c/irisciriiixftiiicfwiW not lie after jiid^r- MKiit for the purpose of e.\ccutinj,' the jml"- ment in the name of u suhidMai,.,! cre.'l.tor. Joiifs iV; Crelti(s.iu ic Cliei'ullid; U K. L. 510 .S C. Is77. ;Ull. A petition en njtrise d'iii.itniwc liavin" lieen tiled in the prothonolaiy's ollice after set" vice upon the parties, and having' remained ci^^ht ilays uncontested, the pelili,,iier al the e.\i)ii\'aion ol that time moved, iin.ler arts. l;!l) k I 10* of the Coile of Procedure, that, it he de- clared, a.lmilted and well lounded. Molioii rejected as jiiematiire, no demand of plea aii- peariiij; hy the record, lliimel &, Laliberte.W y. L. U. 212, .S. C. 1H75. ;iU2. Andajndgmeiitot tlKM;ourtdeclarin"tIie continuance well lounded is recpiisiie even where no cause is shown a^'ainst the petition. V hull iiiuHci tie & Tmi.sii/iKinl. lb. .'iU.'i. L'mler Insolvent Act, 1S75— //,'/,/, that an appellant could not demand, onthe insolvencv ol the respomlent, thai his assignee take up ih'e iii.tliiiic: MrKiiiimii ii Tlwmmort, 23 L. C .1 !)5, Q. 15. 1^7,s. 'Mi. An assignee cannot lie compellcil to take up the in.ttaiire in a suit pending agam.st the insolvent. J'le.s.ns v. Lajok, 1 l..'iV. 327, & 2;i, L. C.J. 2i;{,S.C. 1878. ■■( oiilaiiiiMl 'u iippcal i h. N. s^-j n^ ,|„„. ;„ ^^u. Ct — * 111" conhmiaiice limy lie elTi'Ctcrl n|io)i pptition filed III tlie iiriiilioiKiiiirj's , lliee iiliir lii'iii)! s.rvi'd iiiioji the ei.jiuMiL-i.aiiy. This i„.lili„n iiiiiv lie fuiiu.MeU in the ."iiiiieiiiaiiiii r lis any Biiii. 4;w ('.('. t'. Ii tlie euiilihiittiice i,i not cmilesleil Hitliiii tlie delays Iiru.^eribud 11 is held Id to iuliiiilied, :iiiU in Miidi cas ■ as also when ii is .hrli.n.d hy i|r. ...jnri t- 1,... uell luunilrd, uie ipiMjMie imiiy may oontinuc mi fium llie la.sl nio- ceeUuigs uriginally taken. UviJ.C.V. )\U\K. (12 1 625 PIIOCKDIJUE. (her lie rotili'-ti ihi. I'i,iili,,l, t Q. I,, K. ArT(m\i:v kuom Miditii; In S(\,)tliiii,l 1 1 H Ini^i'. Tllf ihiy llif ili'li'iiiliiiii iiiiii',. ii'l-, whic'li wii-i liir- 'ulU'i'. Tlicn llic .|... •|iliip|i, nri llicyronii I md lici'ti I'lirni-lM^I .ir llic i'.\i;i'|iliiiii us lilcl till' IIKltloll, llllll ill,. 1 iiiily run Iimiii iii.. lilt in. Mikltdl v. C. C. 1H8U. II),' «iil lie allnucd liirjii'il wiihdiit ihi' 11 n'liciinii;; lU'ilcicil. /'. kinul Tni.s/rc.i, I ill not lie iU'lcr jii.i;.'- ■xi'c'iiliiij; till' JuiIl- iilii'djiHlt'd crcdiiDi'. lifi; 'J H. L. jilii, S. e iViuslmicc liaviiit; ry'.t t>llii;c niter xai- 1 Imviii;,' iviniiiiicl ' Jictil inner ill tlie I'd, niidi'i- arts. l:il) ■diuc, llial it lie i\v loiiiiiieil. iliiiiun demand of plea uji- iiiicl it, Laliberti, .'{ LM;(iiindeclarin;,'tlie is requisite even tiaiiist the iietitiou. :, 1S7-)— //,.;,/, tliat idjOiitlienisulveiicv ssit!iiee take up tiie umj'tKiii, 23 L. C J. P coinpellcd to take lending ajiainsl the , 1 L.'N. ;)27, , whi.di were radically null if they fell ,iii a nmi-jurid.cal dav, fxcept in cases „f priKdaniations of ihank"- Kivili;;, etc , under Art. 2. t'/„„„jm,/,ir & Gri- veau Ji B(,i.yoli, lo U. L. 20;i, C. C. Ksso. XLI. Skrvick. 626 .!0.S. ^1/ Domirih' — Tn action of(laniaj;e.s for lilicl the writ and deidaration were served at the reHdence ol the Fremdi consul at gmdiec, "liere the defendant wasilwelling. I,, hisahsence service was made u| a servant there who opened the door to the hailiti and took the fiipies from him, and told him that deleinlant Won . tie hack in a ipiarter of an hom., that siie "(III Id put the papers on hi- tahle and give them to liim as .so,„i as he oame hack — //,■/e\vliere, is validiv K-rved hv leaviii;; the copies with the servaiit 3;i!i tfilTHn'' ''^'''"''" ^ ■'^"'""'^' ^ ^^- ^- ^^' ■W.). At rr„f/,n,i(>tun/\i Office.— U is not in- cessarythat a cipy of the .leclaration in an action of revendicalion should he served at the Jirothonotary's hy u hailifi; it is sulticieiit that a coj.v he left lit the cilice. Jf,„r/, & Rliind, Tl L. C.J. i;w, 1 L. N. 101, Q. If. is7,s ;nO. Ihiiliirs L'l,//it iu Makii.—K hailiff does not lo.se his n>ht to make a service in 'i dis- trict lor which he is appointed hv hein.- ap- pointed to anotlier and actinj; there.t C'it du ii'nT c" c''U''' ^'""''''"''''''* '■t Gauthkr,-i h. ;!1I. 0/ Ahmiilee.—kn ahsentee hav'U" pro- perty here may he sued here, thou),'h no pei- soiial service is made, and though the caii.se of "ction (lid not originate liere.t Mnnlonald v. Mnckuy k limith, 2 L. N. 301, S. C. 11. 1879. rirmi,n,',"»^7.r 'T''''^'' '*''yt''l»«,o>'Kl't to be done in purbiiinice ol IIih law is a iion-iiiridical dtiv siith tliin- Say 3 0."c. V."''"'"'''"' "'"'"-' """ ""lowing juridf- ii vi^^Val^a'^ to service la another district see Q. 42- ■11.. (>t .{,„>„d,d l(V//.-rn an action M..'ainst allrni an e.Mvption to ll,.. lorn, atlackmg the "'■''*"■'',"' " '"'••'I "rit hecan-e made afier the (•rigtnal ivliirn day was di«iiii.sed with co-ts h>i.^ rrn J,,wnM,,>i Hunk Ac M.,nitl, 1 L. \. ;{(). .11.1. (If All,,.--\X\n'r,' an atlornev W lilni, neglects to make an election of doinicile service is properly made upon him at iheiiro- IhoMotary s oili,.,,, iiul„.,h„a v. Murhm & J-iiirrn; 2 {;. .\. l,s|, s. C. 1-^71). ■'Ml. I'laintiif ohtained judgment a.'ainsi the /J'r.v.v„/.v, condemning him to pav monev, and llie assi^iu'e -erved a |K'titioii on the atloinevs of plaiiitill, praving that the fin-.i .v„/.«/ I 'der ,1 "lit I" pay the money to plainlill-//,././. that loe -ervice on the attorneys alter .ind..'n,enl di 1 ";;' ' ' ;'"', plHuHHf a- the mandate of the l.lt,,rnevs ha I ,.iided /lo,,//, v. L„.;„h-./ „/. ,t Ji„/ ,1,1,1 Si I),,,,,!,,. 'IX K. C. .). :m, ,S. C ls77 -l... O/ (:„-,),■/,■,„/,>„/ -A Corporation havin",. Its head olhce aii.l pl.ice of hnsiness in Ontario was sued as cu-partneis a ,| c<,-delendanis of ii person residing at lAingueiiil, and the onlv ser- vice was upon the latter at l-ongiieuil -Z/^/,/ „„ iiii opposition toa.iiidgiiient against hoth inriies liv deliiu I, as there was no evidence of parlner- ship II e,e was no .service upon the Corporation, and Ihe.indgnieni v/«w,/tliem wasset a-ide (Ji- In;',, V. C„„ii;n/, 2 I.. .V. ;)0(t, 8. C. I(s7!t Ml-,. Of (',„„,,„„,/. ~o,i an exception to tlie U,r,u-/M,l, that a return of service upn,, nu eiiiployeot hefeiidants at their otiice and olaee ■ d l;n;i'i('ss was sullicient. /!„,„■,/„;„ v. .ll,,,,/- '■':;'', 0/,nv„ X Occidmtal liuilwity Co., :t |,. N' l.il, S. C. Is.so. .•{17. />/;«.'rwW.v.-rii action against hinhaiid and wie jointly and .severallv a copv ol the writ and declaration must he ,s"erved iip'on each V,tii.s,;-vtt(i V. A,c/,„,i,/,i,nll, 21 L. C J 'lir' S C. I^<77;,')!),t«7 C. C. 1'. " "•""-'*• ;!1K. (}f C',r{„ii;,li„„.—Si'r\\iie upon a jire- sidenl, .secretary or a.i.'eiit mav he ma.le either personally on the olljcer or "at his doimeile. Jimtid ,,/ Ifiiiponilifie.i y. Mi,,;.,/,.,- ^ T,-,i.^/,'c.i of .y. Aii,hr,L''.'iVh„r,-h,:\ L. N.;i7i», g. li is.so . .11 J. OJ I,d,;-v,;iti„i,. -TUc service ol an intervention upon the pLiintiffs atiornoy isasuf- hcient service upon the plaiiititl'. li,,^ v Miiri/dii A- /i,iiU,',\ { y. I,. i{, isi, S. C. |s7,s. .'120. Where a petition in intervention i.s .-erve,l upon the parlies hefore allowance, it . oe,s not repute to he .served afterwards. n.,i„i„e I i/h' Miii-i,-k Linuiii. .{ L. N. 317, S. C. I.sso 321. <>/ .V«//o/(.— Motion to reject aiipeal' INoliceot motion served on a person who had heen appointed prothoiiotarv /,el,l iiiMillirient as hewas no hniger a practicing a.lvocate! .'•'/!"''',* llminl, 1 L. \. hW, q. U. 187,s 322. The defendant made a nioiion for i„;-em- tlon d iii,sl,ti,cc. Theplaintilf's attorney resided in an adjoining district, and the service was made personally upon him tliert — Jl,'l,l that this was u mjod .-ervice, though the plaiiititrs attorney had electe,] a domicile in tlie district oi Montreal where service could be made. Mc- ^■liT n {^Z"-'"""'' 1 L. N. 555, & 22 1.. C . J. :i2;i. Of I\irf„a:s afWi- lJ,:-s„l,iiiuii.—\VHere in an action against a qwimhim partnership exception to the form was filed settin" up tiiat the service was bad, inasmuch as it had been 1%: m ,1 62t PROCEDURE. PROCEDTTRE. 628 li « iiinde at thp place of business of the firm in tlie ordiniirv way, ami alwo nisileHcription in liein- de.scniieil an " partners" instead of" hereiofure co-partner.M," whereas tlie livni was prit)r to the insliliitionof the aotiim (hssoived, and notice of sucli dissolution published in a local newspaper —Hihl, that as the dissolution had not been ref;istered,and no knowledge of it proved agains plaintill's, that theservice was sutrieient. Greni- shhhls V. Wymaii d ul. 21 h. C. J. 40, S. C. 187t). '■A'li. Of liaibeay Commissioners.— The Qwe- bec Railway Coininisaioners were served with an action praying tliat they lie ordered not to pro- ceed with the expropriation of the plaintiffs pro- perly. They each tiled exception to the form, objectinjr anionfr other tilings to the service that It should have been personal and not at their office as they were not in partnershi|i— 7/,V-/, that as the office at which they were served was the office at which they transacted their busi- ness, and from which" they issued notice to plaintiff, that the service was jrooii. Bourqoin k Malhioi, H II. L. 3%, S. C. 187(i. 325. Ofnaixie gageiiepur droit de snite.—^o service of a snisie ijaijerie par droit de suite on the mis en cause is necessary where the mis en cause claims to have purchased the ■'oods Wilson & Uaftvr, 2 L. N. 211, Q. B. 1879? 32(;. Place of .—T]\h case is before the court on the merits of an exception declinatoire. The defendants, five in numlier.are all of the village of St. Andrews, in the District of Terrebonnl-. One of tiieni (John Webster) has been served personally in the City of Montreal. The others liave been served at their domiciles in Terre- bonne, Dame Ellen Walker and Isaliella and Ellen Turner have filed declinatory exceptions decliniiiK the jurisdiction of the court, on the ground that none of them being resident within the limits of the District of Montreal, the service upon John Welister in Montreal diil not give the court jurisdiction over the . ;^27. Where the defendant had left his domi- cile three weeks previously to the service there of the wvh— Belli, goi/d, as there was no proof of an actual change of domicile. Widdron & Brennan, 2 L. N. 333, & 23 L. C. J. 2G8, S. C. 328. Defendant, resident in the Citv of Ottawa, was personally served there wi"tli a summons to appear before the Sujierior Court, ill the District of Ottawa, in the Province of Quebec. The declaration alleged that delen- dani had real estate in the district in which suit was {nought.— Held, on exception diclinaloire, that the service was siifHcient, ami that delen- danl was properly sued. Vuddie v. CiissidiJ, 2 L. N. 34(1, S. C. 1879. 329. Return r;/".— Wliere a defendant is des- cril.fd in the writ a.'^ of the City of Quebec, and fervice is alleged in the return to have been made at liis domicile at Quebec, such mention is I a siiflicient indication that the City of Quebec U i intemled. Ikarn & ^folonl/, 3 Q, L. R 3!') . B. 1S77. ' 3:10. And in such ca.se the oini.ssion to stale the distance from the bailitrs residence to the place of service, ami from the court house to the dettndaiifs domicile or j)!. ice of .service, does not invaliilate the return. lb. 331. The return on a rule (or /idle enchh-e stated that the service had been made at defen- dant's domicile in Stadacona. Evidence iieiu" addiiceil on an exception to the form that Sl.idii^ cona was a village in the parish of St. Roohsde Quebec, motion was made and granted amend- ing the return accordingly— /y^A/, in appeal, that the service and return as amended were siilh- cient, and the folic enchiire was ordered. Bickell & Richard, 1 L. N. 130, Q. H. 1878. 3:12. Where a baililf omits to initial a mar- ginal note, and to state the distance from the court house to the domicile of the defendant, that IS good ground lor an exccj.tion to the form Major V. Chartrand, 21 L. C. J, 303, C C 1877. _ ' 33.3. The word immnlriadee in a bailitrs return of service following an. 78 of the Co.le of Procedure iH not sacramental. Cie. dn Cliemin defer de Laurentides v. Gauthicr'n L. C. J. 174, S. C. 18tj0. XLII. Spkciai, An.swkk. 334. A special answer may be filed to an exception to the form. O'Farrell v. Garnc'iii 4 Q. L. R. 200, S. C. 1878. XLIir. St.w of ax Accou.nt of In.soi.vknuv. i \ .3.35. Where a defendant, become insolvent, made amotion asking that proceedings be staved until the assignee bad taken up the instance, the motion was rejected.* Wilson el al. v. Brnnd 21 L.C.J. 209, 8. C. R. 1877. XLIV. SUM.MONS. 330. B;/ Advertisemcnt.-'The plaintiff in Montreal purchased a cargo of oysters from a dealer in New Brunswick, paying him therefor partly in cash and partly by abon. The oysier.s having turned out worthless, plaintiff notitied the seller, and receiving no satisfaction, brought action for danuiiies. The defendant having no domicile here, plainlitfmade afliflavit as to"the I>on, and called him in by advertisement under art. 08 C. C. P. Judginenl was taken by delault, and defendant appealed.~/ir«'W, tlia't while a bon or not<' was properly within the meaning of said article, there was" no sulHcieiit proof that it belonged to defendant at the dale of the action, and the judgment was set aside, Poiricr & Larcau, 21 L. C. J. 48, Q, B. 187(i. XLV. Unper Different Pleas. .337. Where the defendant after filing a decli- natory exception is required to plead to the tnerits, and then pleads a demurrer, the court may order that the declinatory exception be * Insolvent Act of 1875 i» now repealed. 629 PROHIBITION. PROMISSORY NOTES. 6:?0 IL'.VT OF iN.SOI.VENfV. —The plaintiff' in ) of oysters I'roin a iiiyitig him tlierct'or tihon. The oysters disposed of hefiire proccpilintr on Ihr drniurrpr. Dnchcstunj v. Larocnue, 8 L. N. 'Mi), S. C. 1880. rilOCESSIONS. I. AH0LISHEI> HY QvKllKC ACT 41-i2 VlC Cap. 9. PEOCUIJATION— &e PQWEE OF ATTORNEY. PROFANATION. I. Ok Ckmetkiues, see CEMETERIES. PROHIBITION. I. Cannot iu; Ql'a.shkd on Motion. II. (jKOI'XDS ok. III. JtlKiK MAY Al'l'KAR IN. IV. JllKil-; MAY I'l.KAI) IN. V. Kkjiit ok Ai'i'KAj, IN, see APPEAL. VI. Writ ok. I. Cannot he QrAsnED on Motion. .S.38. A writ, of summons in the nature of a prohibition cannot be quusiied on motion. O'Farrel v. Ganieau, 4 Q. L. K. 200, S. C 1878. II. Grounds of. 339. Asa fiencral rule governinp; the remedv liy prohibition it must be resorted to betweeli the commenceinent of the action complained of and final judfiment; otherwise the want of jurisdiction iTiust appear on the face of the pro- ceediiiL's in order to justify prohibition afler judgment. If the rate jiayer have abstained from urjiinj; before the Magistrate's Court liis objections lo the.jurisdiotion of the magistrate or to the sufliciency of the Municipal Acts, such objections will not afterwards be listened to if urged collaterally upon jiroceedings in prohi- bition. Siiiinrd'v. Carpuniliitn nf Ike. County of Mniitmoraici, 4 Q. L. K. 208, 8. C. 1877. .340. Action was brought in a Magistrate's Court to oust a party trom possession of a house. 'J'iiere was no exception to the juris- diction. After judgment was rendered the ,!e- fendant took a writ of prohibition to have tin- Magistrate's Court ordered not to e.xeeut'i the judgment, on the ground that it had no juri,-, dic- tion, as the value of the improvements exceeiled $50. The court below refused to maintain the writ of prohibition~y/cW, that tlie court of appeal would nut interfere unless tii^re was a defect apparent on the face of the jn'oceedings. Bertiemn v. lioukati el al., 23 L, C. J. 179, Q. B. 1878. 3H. Prohibition will not lie to arrest pro- ceedings taken before a justice of the jieace for the recovery of a sum due in virtue of a }))-(ici'.t- verhdl li)r tlie opening and iimintenanre of a municipal road if no appeal ha-j been had from tlie homologation of the /^coffts-riT/n// within the ilelay jirescribed by law, and especially if t!ie delendanl has ac(|uiesceil in the jurisdieiioii of the magistrate by appearing and pleading to the merits. Simard it ('oyporalioii of the Covnty of Montnioreiici, 8 11. L. 54tj, Q. li. 1878. in. JinGl: MAY Al'l'KAR IN. 342. The judge, who.se judgment is attacked by prohibition, may appear in answer to the ser- vice made upon him. Q. L. R. 207, Q. B. O'Farrel v. Doucet, 4 1878. IV. .Ii'Doi': Prohihitku May Pi.kad. 343. In a case of prohibition, where a convic- tion by the council of the Bar of a member of the nrofession i.s sought to be |>rohibited, with Conclusions for costs ot>ly against the i)nvate prosecutor liefore the bar, the judge nniy be allowed to plead, independently ot'thc other de- fendants to the demand lor such prob.iiiition. O'Fairel & Brassard, 4 Q. L. R. G2, S. C. 1875. VI. Writ of. 344. A writ of prohibition will lie to restrain the proceedings of the Council of the 15ar. 0'Farrel& Bro.ssard, 1 L. N. 32, Q. B. 1.S77. 345. Writ of prohil)itioii addressed to tiie school commissioners of the municipality of the village of Hochelava, to the said municipality ot[ the village of Iloclielaga, to the Corporation of the Council of Hochelaga and to the secre- tary-treasurer of the county, forbidiling these parties from proceeding to the sale of the laiida of the petitioners fitr school taxes pretended to be due to the said school commissicjuers — Held, that the writ would lie iti sucdi case.* Morqan &, Cotf, :5 L. N. 274, Q. B. 18H0 ; & Mi)ellant purchased at a liailirt's .«nlc. hflcl un.lor a wnt ol' Jicri fhrins ,/,' l>„„is for taxes Cfi'taiii moveable elleets Cniiiii.- tlie plant ol a luTWcry, tlie proprietor ..f the lire- werv not oh.|cctin,:r to the Mile, and nllowiiMr the same to rcinain on the brewerv premises on storaj;e. I he lirewcry was s„me months after- wards so, 1 under a writ ,/,- Urns, tlie plant being still thereon and ad.jud*e grounds, that the seizure u i- au absolute nullity, aud could be opposed by third parties interested or bv the debtor himself I- N. .>>, k 2.i L. C. ,;. Wl, S C. ISTH. ;i-J.S. Although the owner of a house i.s not the owner of the ground „n which it stands, it is nevertheless an imm„veable as l.,i,fr ,is i,, js uul ;l''nio ished, and is subject to the same hypothec' I'v winch It was aflecled when it formed to- gether with the ground a single property ■ ''.[":"' 't/%'". •'"> Q. I.. H. 1 11», S. C R. 1S7$' •'*'•>■ In the case of a claim asiainst, an in-iir- "iice .■ompany of Omario-;/,/,/, to be ^x mmlde inmrimrcl, and whether it were considered the property of the wife, or of the s,i<:ce.ssi,,n of the husbaml wasg„yerne,l by the law of Ontario. .i'Z"'^,'^'"''"'"'' ^ J- -N- i-i'h ^V; 2;i L. C. J . -IZ, .>. L. IMii). ■■iol). Ill a dispute about the right to a frame I hou.sc, which had been built with the materials ot one which had existed m another place and h'ul been pulled .lown, and which also had been treateil by tlieiiarfiesasaiiM.veable— y/r-A/.tolK! a moveable, an.l suliject to art. lOl'T C. C '<''.''"/"')•• 'V"ii'l»H. .-{ I.. \. k;,;, s. C. 1880 ' ■i.>l. J he iilaintitl seized am„ng other thing's oii the.ieteiidanl's railway ;!,IUIO railway sleepers ),J..O rai way lastenings, and a -p.antity of cord wood and oilier things inten.led to be consumed 111 the riimuiig of the engines— //?I';,M';''" J^^''-^"" TO Roi'NI)AHIE,H, we BO I NDARIES. •Cnsault, J., (llsscnlknte. flA KTORS. 632 >r \'\ the ili'litdrliiiiiselr, . /ii.is-iiii tt (iniliam, 2 :):;.. s. C. isTH. iViHT (if n liouso is not tin wliich it sIuiiiIm, jt ig iUile !is |(.iijT us j( is |,ui •A lutiic,-itiiK-li_vj)(itliecN I'll when it tiii-inoil to- il) 11 siii^'le pi-opertv '■ K. 1111, S. O.K. 1871). ■liiiiii aiiaiii.it ftii in.-ar- i—J/it:/, |.) he H iii,:u/jle it wt'i-i' CdiisiilcM't'd the >!' tilt- Hiux'e.s.^i,,!! oCtlie liy llic liiw of Oatiirici. N. 12,-,, A; 23 L. C. J. II liu> rifjlit to a IVarae 'iiilt witli tiie iiiatfrials I in amiilier place and III wlii(tli al.^^o iiail lii'Pii iiiuvcalilc— y/r7(/. tolie t to ai't. Uvn C. C X- Kiii.S. V. 1880. ■il ainonj; otlicr lliin^rs .'!,IKH) railway .'^It'cperc, ami a ijuaiitity ol'coni :cii(lcil lo I'econsiimeil UK'S— //(/-/, |)v all the ii.lj,'iiicnt of tfio conrt ' si'i/ed COM III not l)e le.^tinatiun undei- art. '//"// V. Lci-is .('• Kai- 21.!, S. C. iM880. ■i/.nrc oraipiantity of tliin;,'s,,f ijiat, kiiiii in and (lescrilied in tjie umruldviiicHt lie 6m- opponitiuii had been reiiaids these things, i\ oni- law smdi as Ih Vapoleon that " Le.t ''hh/hwIk !i a plaris ion lie cefonds noiU t.v " used alone in a (■alile.s and iniinove- 1 L. X. ,!22, & 22 al, .t8 K. L. 5%, pmpoi'ty within the Code (d' i'l'ocediire. J.48, y. B. 187(). ^ NEKJHHOE- ETOllS. Ill) TO JiorND.UlIKH, 633 PllOVIXCIAL LEGISLATUKE. ritOSECUTlONS. VFnV'v"^^" ^''"''^"'•^''■-^"'" ^•^■''' ■«''« INSOL- LAW '■'''"'" ''"''■■^'■'^'■' ^^<"''' «'« LICENSE PROTEST. n.i.xr^r.lV'''"" ^^^ XoTKS, «ee BILLS OF K\- TROTHONOTARY. I. LiAnii.rrY ok. II. Kl'l.K A(iAINST. I. Ll.\l)lI,ITV OF. Sou Action 8, S. C. 1877. III. Who auk. DoO. A day laborer (iir a municipal corjior- ation IS not a public otlicer so as lo be entitled to a montirs notice of act ion fur damages caused bv the work done in such capacity. Jlollon & Aikins, 3 Q. L. U. 289, Q. B. 1875. PUBLIC POSSESSION. I. So AS TO Sui'pouT PiiEscuii'TioN, see PRE- SCRIFTIUN. PUBLIC ROADS. I. I'uKSORiPTioN OK, ,«e PRESCRIPTION. II. What auk, .vee MUNICIPAL CORPOR- i^.TIONS Roads. PUBLIC WORKS. I. POWKII OF GOVKHN.MK.NT WITH ReSI'ECT TO, see INJUNCTION. »ii.fa S! t If «35 qt:rbec legislature. rUBLTC WORSHIP. QUEBEC STREEET RAILWAY. 636 PURCHASER, ^D.^n.uxcK o.. see RELIGIOUS «EIU | ^^r^Ac.o.„v..o E.kot. L....,..e LESSOR n. Rkmki)v OF, IN Case op Dkficikncv op PUXISHIIENT— .Sfes FINES, PENALTIES. Land, ,ee VENDORS AND PURCHASERS. PURCHASES-^ee SALE. Q. ;S U M M R A Y OF TITLES QUAlJFrCATION g^g QUAXTU MIXOUIS "" ,;'j5 QUAXTL-.M MERUIT "" ^'^ QUARRVMEX " g.'jg QUASI DEMT " cTj QUEHEC LEGISLATURE....".".'. g'so QUEBEC OFFICIAL GAZETTE .' m QUEBEC STREET RAILWAY.... esc, QUEEN'S RENCH ' e'jj QUEEN'S COUNSEL ^V QUI TAM ^;„ QUORUM '.' g';'g QUO._ WARRANTO .'..'. c^g it QUALIFICATION. ttI\S^', Canmpates at Ei.ECTioxri, see ELEC- llOiS LA\V QUANTO MINORIS. L Action- of, see ACTION. QUANTUM MERUIT. I. Action- for, nee ACTION. ATTORNEYS ^" ^'f'V'N'Kvs ad litem, ,vee QUARRYMEN. I. Puivii.EGK OF, see PRIVILEGE. QUASI DELIT. I. Partirs .Tointi.y and Severally Liaiile FOR, see OBLIGATIONS. crlrlv.VrP'x''''"'''"'' "^' DAMAOEa FOB, «ee PRE- bLRIPl lOX . QUEBEC LE(aSLATURE. I. Power of, see LEGISLATIVE AU- THORITY. QUEBEC OFFICIAL GAZETTE. ^■fc'vmnxTnT^*-7>'™ "^ Announcements in, se EVIDENCE, Official Notice. QUEBEC STREET RAILWAY. I. Right of, to Level Streets. 1. An Act of the old Province of Canada, 27 Vic. cup. 6I,autliorized tlie Corporation created by It to construct a street railway tiirou.'li Val- liers street to the toll gate in the Hiilmrhs of Qiiehec, on any of the roa-ls and streets of the city for which they inisht (.htain the wrniission of the Corporation of Quebec. Sec. 5 of the Act provided further that " les lh>ies du cliemin autonsi aiirnni le meme niveau que In rue et ' la vote ten-ge aura auiant que possible la •' TnSme decliinU." The Act went to say- '' La ciU de Quebec,les mimicipalitis adjacenles ou aucmie d'elles et la dite compa^tiiie soni par le present respectivement autorisies d faireet i\ " passer des arrangements ou stipnlati„ns au ; sujet de la construction du dii cheiriu de fe<- • et de tons les tramux qui s'lj rattachent et de la circulation des chars sujets aux restrictions contenues dans le present acte d passer des r^ylements," etc The railway conptructed hy virtue of these powers passed in front of the plaintiff s property, wliere the roadway was quite low and so hailly made as to L* at so e seasons almost inipasHahle. The company therefore were obliged to raise the level some two feet nine inches in the middle and two feet at the .sides. Die plaiiitiir complained of this as ot)structing the entrance to his hoxn^e-Reld, that under their Act of Incorporation the defen- »H !T EAILWAY. 636 lASER. T A Lkssee, see LESSOR !Af>R OF DEFlriKNCV OP ^ND PURCHASERS. 1— -See SALE. 637 QUEEN'S COUNSEL. ILWAY 63r, 6;i7 637 fi;!8 638 638 ilftiil.e liad a ritrlittorniso the level of tlie street, and tlie Corporation ot Qiieliec had a ri^ilil to authorize tlieni to do so; and, tiiiil in any casf tiieir reuourpe was ajiainstthe ninnioi|]alily and not (iiiainst the detendant.i. Lauzoii \ . Quebec Street liailwuy Co.,4 Q. L. R. 18, S. C. R. 1877. QUEEN'S BENCH. I. ]!ir,iiT OF, TO IssiE Ckutiouaiu, see CER- TIOJiARJ. QUEEN'S COUNSEL. 1. Appointment of. 2. Tlie Provincial Legislatures cannot author- ize the lieutenant governors df the Provinces to appoint Queen's Counsel. Lenoir & liitchie, 2 L. N. 87:), Su. Ct. lS7y. QUO WAEEANTO. 638 QUI TAM— ^fee ACTION. L Pi.KADiNr. IN Action ok, wc ACTIO NT. QUOIIUM. L Ok Harhok Commissioneuh, see HARBOR COMMISSIONERS. QUO WARRANTO. I. Power of Couut in Cases of. 3. On a petition in quo warranto against an alderman — 7/e/(/, that the court could exercise its discretion as to granting the petition even where a good ohjection was shown. Rtnj v. TkibauU, Tl L. C. J. 280, S. C. 1878. II. Right to. 4. Quo warranto will not lie to contest tlie right to a municipal oflice, which must he (lone in the manner provided hv the Muiii<'ipal Code. Fiset & Funruier, 3 Q. L.'R. 3;!4, S. C. R. 1877. ■iii tAL GAZETTE. p Announcements i.v, iL Notice. T RAILWAY. u Streets, rovince of Canada, 27 le Corporation created railway thron>:li Viil- te in the suburhs of tnJs and streets of the obtain the pt'rniission lec. Sec. 5 of the Act les Ihses du chemin niveau que la rue ci iant que possible la Act went to say — nicipalit6s adjacentes ecompuijnie soni par lutorisiesdfaircetil ' ou stipulations mi du dil cimriii defer i s'y raltac/ieut et de iijets aux restrictions it acte d passer des lilway constructed by ^sed in front of the le roadway was quite lic at so c seasons company therefore level some two feet and two feet at the plained of this as his house— /ieW, irporation the del'en- R. SUMMARY OF TITLES. RAFTS fi.-^9 RADIATION G39 RAILWAYS 6;{9 REAL ESTATE 643 RECEIPT 644 RECEIPTS 644 RKCEIVING STOLEN GOODS 644 RECONDUCTION 644 RECORDS 644 RECUSATION 645 REDHIBITOIRE 645 REFRESHMENTS 645 llEGISTRAR 645 REGISTRATION 646 REGLEMENT DE COMPTE 651 REINSCRIPTION 651 RELATIVES 651 RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS 651 RELIGIOUS SERVICES 652 REMUNERATION 652 RENT 652 RENUNCIATION 653 REPAIRS 6,'.3 REPARTITION 653 REPEAL 653 REPLICATION..,., 653 REPORT 654 REPORTS AND ACCOUiNTS 654 REPRISE D'INSTANCE 654 REPRISE MATRIMONIALES 654 RRQUETE CIVILE 654 RESCISION 655 RESERVED CASE 655 RESIDENCE 635 RESILIATION 655 RESOLUTION 655 RESOLUTIONS 655 RESOLUTION 655 RESPONDENTIA 655 RETAINER 656 RETENTION 6.5G RETURN 656 RETURNING OFFICER 656 REVENDICATION 656 REVIEW 656 'lEVISION 659 REVOCATION 659 REVOCATORY ACTION 659 REWARD 659 RIGHT OF ACTION 660 RIGHT OF WAY 660 RI PARIAN PROPRIETORS 660 RISK 661 RIVER BEACHES 661 ROADS 661 ROLLING STOCK 662 ROOFS 063 RULE 66.3 RULES '. 664 RULES OF PRACTICE 664 .i^ 01 191 639 EAILWAYS. EAFTS. lUILWAYS. G40 I. IXDICTMKNT FOB MooiUXG SO AS TO On- STUiTT A Navksable KivKii, set CUIMINAL JiAW, NnsANCE. I": J^IuoKiN'u OF, see RIPARIAN PROPRIE- IJI. Name of. III. Name op. 1. RaftH should have tho name of owner ipgibly pivniteil on a lioani to he fi.xeil on the raft. Difen.hiiits tine.l $20 tor ne.'leetini' this rule. Koi-mnndeaii & Grier, G Q. L. R. 45. Har. Com. lt!74. RADIATION. I. Of IIyi'otiikc, «te hypothec. EAILWAYS -See STEEET RAIL- WAYS. I Ai'Pi.icATioN- OF Act. IF. ExpRoi'itiATiox Fur. III. LlAHII.lTY OF. Far Arcideais. IV. MdVKAlll.K PrtOl'KRTY OF, NOT TmMOVF- Aui.K BY Dkstixation-, .w,' PROPERTY. V. POWKII OF AllBITUATOll.S IX E.'il'ttOl'RH.- TIOX FOR. VI. POWKR OF CoM1>AXV TO DlS.SOLVK. VII. RuiHT OF Execution Against Guanu Irink Railway. VIII. RifjHTs of Boxdiioldkr. IX. RuiiiTs OK Contractors foj{ Coxstruc- Tiox, see CONTR.\CT,S, Ixtkrpketatiox of. A, RiciiiTs of Shareholders. Xr. Skizire of. XII. Tickets. 1. Ai'i'Lic.iTioN op Act. 2. The Consoliilated Railway Act of 1879 (o. 42 Vic. cap. 'J') applies to t\\e Quebec, Mon- treal, Ottawa and Occidental Railway. Jo/u & Moreau, 2 L. N. 284, S. C. 1879. II. EXPROPRIATIOX FOR. 3. On action to set aside an award of arbi- tration iietween the Montreal, Ottawa and Occi- dental Railway and the (h'fendants— //j-W, that matters of expropriation for the purposes of Siiid railway were regulatetj and governed by the Fe.leral .Act ,S8 Vic. cap. GS, and not bv the local legislature. Monircal O/tawa A 'Occidental lunlicay v. Buuryuuiii, 7 R. L. 715, S. C. 1877. III. Liability of. 4. Tlie defendants, the Grand Trunk Rail- wav. Ill carrying their line through the township ol lingwick were obliged to crosa a .strc.ani in „r^'^\ ""* Railway Consolidation Act f f the Province of Quebec, see Q. 43-14 Vic. cap. 43. that township known as Trout River, over which the plainlills had eonstructcil a hrid-e some MKy leet lower d.iwn than wliere the rad- road crossed. Tlie itailwav, in conseoiience of the sandy nature of the bottom of the river, were oliliged to lay a verv heaw stone foundation which obstructed the natural flow ol the wuier to that extent that, escaping from the lirid.'e it rushed with considerable velocitv on to' tlie hridge of idaintitfs and uudernii"iied il. The plaiiitids alleged that, in consequence, thevhaj lieen obliged to lec^onstruct their bridL'e'oiice already, and that again it had been destroved. On Ilie proof the Superior Court in lirst instance" allowed $7()0,which was reduced by the Coiirtof Review, and by the Court of Al)-)eal raised a.'ain to ^m). Corporation of TiiK/wick v. Grinid I R 'l ,"''"'"■'/ (-^"»'Piii>!/, 'J R'- L. ■■«<), A: H q. T ^' f'",'^ -*«■'■"'('«'■''■.— Tlie crossing of tiie Grand Irunk R iilway at Levis is recognized as one of tlie most dangerous po.ssible. The Company in consequence kept a guardian there, butsnli.e- qnently removed him. On the 25th Januaiv, 18<4, ihe mail driver between Levis and ,St Romuald was killed by a train -niin' eastward at an unusual hour. The w .w sued lur damages, and a verdict was rendeiv.l in iier favor lor.$2000. On appeal— //,•?,/, that the company was responsible, even though thev had taken all the precautions require.l by the Railway .Vet, if thev iiad not taken the additional preeauli.ms rendereii neeessa-y bv the exceptionally dan- gerous nature of the crossing. Gra.id ' Tniiilc hailvm;/ Companij ,'uod. McDuuald v. G. T. U., S. C. R. 1871). VIII. RllillTS OF BoNUHOLDER. It). A liolder of railway bonds l)as the riglit by conservatory process to prevent rolliiij^stocit winch H hypothecated lor the payment ol' the boiiils fVoni beini,' removed from the road. U'yutl ii S -* 19. Tlie railway of an incorporated company may be seized and sold in e.xecution of a judg- ment in favor of a mortgage creditor. The Corporation of the County of Drumniond v. 'The South JJd.fteni Count ie.i Railway, 24 L. C. J . 27G, & 3 L. N. 2, Q. B. 1879. XII. TlCKKTS. 20. Railway tickets marked "good only for continuous trip within two days " cannot be used alter the expiration of such time in pay- iiienl of tare over part of the route covered by it. Liviny.stone v. The Grand Trunk Itallwuy Co., 21 L.C. J. l;i, S. C.R. 1870. EEAL ESTATE. I. Donation of, nee DONATION. II. 1'ai!Tnkr»hii'.s To Traffiu in, see PART- NERSHIP. III. Rkglstration of, see REGISTRATION. IV. .Sai.k of, .fw SAJJ'j. V. TuAiiiNii IS NOT A Commercial Matter, see PARTNERSHIP. iiV.G¥AVT—Se.e INTERIM RECEIPT. I. Mav w. Si;t Aside. II. Set Aside as Fraidui.ent. I- May he Set Aside. 21. Action for a balance (exceeding $'2,5) of rent due 1st October, 187!). The plea was tlial plaintill' had already in-titiited a previous action lor this halanceduf 1st October, 187!), and that defendant had paid the same aii.| got a receipt and discharge in full from plaintill's attorney for all rent diieuptothatdale. Plaintiff answered that the date " 1st October" in the previous action was an error, and should have been \*i August, and that the receipt was given bv error and signed by an unauthorized clerk-//e/(/, that the error could be proved by witnesses, and liiat on proof of the error the burden was on the defendant to show that all the rent sued tor had been paid. Worthinaion & Jaques, 3 L. N. 143, C. C. 1880. II. Set Aside as Fraudulent. 22. The assignee to an insolvent estate .sued for a sum of money due insolvent iiniler a deed of s, le. Plea ol payment and receipt tiled. Answer, that the receipt was simulated and frau- dulent. Proof, that payment was only by apro- missory note which had been transferreil to delendant's m'ie—Held, setting aside the receipt. MelauQun & Bessener, 2L. N. 280, S-C. 1879. RECEIPTS— 6'ee WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS. RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS. I. Indictment for, see CRIMINAL L.WV. RECONDUCTION. I. Of lease, see LEASE. RECORDS. L In Criminal Cases, , tee CRIMINAL LAW. II. Introduction of Papers Foreiun to. III. 'J'ransfer of, .see PROTHONOTARY. IV. When I.ncomplete. II. Introduction of Papers Foreign to. 23. An application was made for the court to givea certilicate thiU certain papers had been frauduleiilly inserted in the record sent to the Privy Council, and that the opinion of one of the learned juilges had been wrongly staled, and a false opinion written over the judge's name. It would perhaps be the liut.y of tbis court to make inquiry whether .so gross an irregularity had taken place, but on looking at the papers C45 EEGISTliAl ERS Foreign to. tlienipclves the court fbunu that the papers attiickfii did not forii; pint of tlie paper book whicli piii|K)i-(i-il to he thf tnin.-cript oC llie reconi, Iml wiisRiiMply lhtMirf,'iiri,cntor uouiiscl. IhiH upjicareil on the moat I'liisorv glance at the paper lioi)k, and it was inij.ua-nile to siippune fiiat tiie jii.heial coniniitlee could have heen led into errcir, or tliat anv daiiia^ie could have resultei tlierelix.tii. It was ccuniieteiit for coun- sel, il they Haw lit, to liuve drawn the uttentioii ot the judicial coiiiinitteo to it. lint this court coulil not jrive any ceni*icate that it was liil.se, hecunse, m) lUr a.s tiie jmigeH know, it was uot (aite. Ahbult & Fvuser, Q. B. 1S77. IV. Wjikx I.nco.mplete, 24. AVhere tlie affidavit on wliich a capiaii was founded was Uiissing from tiie record it was lield that the capimt could not he maintained, tlionirh llie eotile.station hv deleiidant was miini- Icst y iinlouiided. llotte v. Chirrie & McDonald &, Uorduii, 1 L. N. H'S, S. C. KS77. liECUSATION. I. Op.rnxiKs, ,9^^ JUDGES. If. Uk iM.uii.-iuATi;. IJI. PiiuCKiJiRE i.v Matters OF. II. Ov Maoistuate. 25. A district magistrate was held not to he disqualified tiMm sittiiig in and hearnig a cause between a lucal and a county cdrporation by reason of being a iiUe payei" OirporatUm of Uin.s/i of s/. Giiiltdiime v. Corjioratioii of' Couidij Dmmmond, 7 R. L. u(i2, Q. B. 1H7G. " III. PKOJEDrUE IN MaTTKK.S OF. 26. Wiiere one of the parties to a suit filed a recusation ot the jmlge belijre whom a motion was to be arjrued, and the judge answered that tliere was no gmnnd lor it— //<■/(/, i hat the recu- sation inusteulier lie withdrawn or disposed of before the case could proceed. Montreal Citif anil DMrirt Sai-ini/.i Hank \ . Gedden ei al.'2 L.Iv. 271, S. C. 1879. EEGISTRATION. I. Action dv for Kkes. G4G REDHIBITOIRE— ,§ce ACTION, liEUlIIlilTOKY. EEFEESHMENTS. I. Supplied at Elections, see ELECTION LAW, Briuery, &c. REGISTRAR. I-. Action bv, fop. Pees. II. IIITIES, &C., OF. III. LlAllILITV OF, 27. He u,.s registrar, and the ilefendant was i retuiniiig olhcer, and reijiiired fr(,in him the I election lists, which were furnislied, and the aciiun is bioi.gbi for the jirice of the work, ilie delendanld.d not plead; but submitted liiniself to the .ludgment of the conn—Jhld reversing the judgment of tlie cuurl at .loliette' that the piainiiff was entitled t.. be paid by the returning uflicer who hail re,,ueMed liin. to do tlie work, althdiigh the returning officer had iH.t received the amount from the Government. Jioc/ier V. Liprohoii, S. C. li. lS7(;. n. Duties, &i;., of. 2^. The provisions of cap. 37 of the Con. Mats, of Lower Canada, sees. 74, 75 & 76 relaluig to tiie deposit by registi'ars ,;f the official plans and buoks of reference for each regisiratKin ilivision, have lieen abro.'ated in virtue of Art. 2013 of the Civil Code? bv the express provisions on the same subject contained ,n Arts 2 1 (is, 21(;!), 2170 A 2171 of the same U>iW. Md.itizaiidiert & Jiumonlicr, 4 t> L R 235, & H It. L. 111!), y. B. 1877. 2i). Anil a registrar cannot be condemned to pay the fine imposed y the tirst-iiamed statute lor failure to keep urn day to day the index required by Art. 2171 of the Civil Code. 10. III. LlADILITY OF. 30. A registrar is responsible to the creditor or any damage cause.l by the omission of a liypoliec in Ins certilicate furnished to the slieritl,aii,I the creditor may proceed against the registrar to recover the amount witii interest wahoiil showing that the debtor and others liahle on the hypothec are insolvent. Tni.st ">■!■> if'u ^'"- ''^' '^'"'""^" & Duprus, 3 L. N. o.jij (^. ii. 1880. REGISTRATION.* I. After Action Broi-giit. n. I)i:i,Av TO Register. ^'/.x)''"''''"''-^"''^ Acceptance of Delfgatiov Hce HYl'OTHEC, Delegation-. '^'■'■^•"'O''' IV. Not EticivALE.NT to Acceptance of Al^^p'iyK.fiK^^^'-'^'-^^-^^^^HS V . Of Baili.ei'r dk Fond.s. VI. Of Constituted Rent. VII. Ok Customary Dower. VIII. Of Deaiii of Testator. IX. Of Donation, see DONATION X. Of Hypothec. Xf. Of l.M. moveables. XII. Uk MARitiA(iE Contract. XI II. Of AloRTGAGE ON AIerchant Ship- XIV. Op Rights of Succession XV'. Of Sale. XVI. Of Servitudes. XVII. Priority of. XVI If. Renewal of. *KoK AMKNniNo Acts. ,w O 42-49 v;„ „» 27; 43-44 Vic. caps. 17; ^ii-io Vie^'i'pl'iotraT.^'''"'* t fl ;i* 4 •i| K^^m "^ tm I j|B M li J li i m i.iM ■■■■■ 1 ■ 1 1 G47 TIRGISTBATION. REGISTRATION. I. Akti-:i! Aciiov IJiioniirr. 618 .'U. I he n';.'istrn!i()i) (iC a donl of snip of an iiiiiiiiivcal.lc al'ici' llie iiHtiliiiiou ofati hvpdtlu.- oary nclum against it uhiiHtm no litlc' (in the piiroliascr. [,; Sor. ilc r,„i.i/,-iir/i,,n Mrtr,,,,,,//. faiiiev. lirdiifhiiiiii) k Ihii'id'.i I^. N l.i,-) s (" n. Dkhv to Ri:i;i.-iTKii. 32. 0\ .1 cannot pica.l lliat a will wn,^ not re- KHIciTi! witlmi the dclav rcpiiiv.l l,v law if I i(Mrnj.'lils liavf Ivcii ac.|iiiiv,l -^nbsciim.nllv to n, '"'"'.','■' ."'!','' ,'"' ••'■-"-"■■"i"". U'l/irme v. Jiidiiin\ '1\ I.. C. J. 'J-<, S. (', 1S77. \ . Ok JJvii.i.Kih i)i; FoxDs. .Ti. Tlio rcLri.-itvation at anv time of a .lood of Hale ol iniiiiovcalili'.M jms.-nl jin,,,. t,, tlic Ut'.'istra- tion Onloniiancc of Isn.Havc in tlu- case of prpscnption, has tlic I'lloct of |,r('.sei-vin" tlu> IM'iyikYc and liypotliou of the vpnd-.r as ajJJiinst a tliinl lioLliT wjio has hatered until 21st Aiij;ust, 1S74 at which dale the respondent caused a nieniorial thereol to he registered, which indicated and set forth the conveyance ol thepro|,(rtv re"is|ered without mention of any lialancc due tirereoii to the vendor of the purchase nionev. On the same day as the registration the purchaser .rave the respondent an ohlijraticn for !?li()l)0, wuh hvpo- thec on the iiiimoveahle in .piestion, which "was duk registered. It was not until 7th Septemher, lSi4, that the vemlor caused hi.s tk'M of .sale to 1.0 registered. He then di,l ,so l,v transcription at full length— y/r/,/, on a coiite.station of the collocation of the proceed.s of the projiertv, tiiat the registration of the purchaser'.s title 'hv the respondent inonler to eiiahle them to take a liypotliec on the property dii) not jireserve to the vendor ins privilege of &«///«(/• (/.-/o/;,/.*, and tiiat the mortgage of the respondent should he collocated hy preference. C/i(ifle/>oi.i A- Ln Snci- 6t6 (/e Coii.-Mlruct. Aiiiielhint contested on the g.-ound that tlu declaration of 'he ,leath ol respondent's hushand had not hee., ugistered m conloriiiily with 2(I1),S (' {.' —11,1,1 that appellant could not invoice Ih,. leui'-rcnstra' tion as, until the .ieath of respondent's hu.sl.aiid, X. Ok IIveoTiiKc. VI. Ok CoxsTiTrTicn Iti.;.VT. 35. Under an emphyteutic lea^e from a sei<'iiior the lessee IS also a seignior, and all concessions made hy him ,1 litre de ccii.s or of constituted rent are exempt from registration. McCord Montreal, 2 1.. N. 417, Q. B. 1879. Vrr, Of Ci-sTOM.\Rv Do-A-KH, see 41 15 Y Cap. lb. ic. •!(. 1 he mention in n deed ofmorf.'a.'e oftlio e.Mstence of aprevious mortga','e is not Millicieiit to give pn.u-ity to the mortgage thus mentioned 1 11 has not I.eeu regularly registered, nor will he <;onsent ol the second mortiragee he inferred Iron :,uch mention, as the most express consent only on the part of the wcond mortgagee can relieve the first moitgagee from the m-ce.ssitv of registrat ion. Jnti w,t A' La Vie de I'nf rf C'r'edit J-"i'cur<\^ /'ope, 2f !,. C. J. 2S, S. C. 1,S78. •i.'^. 1 he registration ol a hyp. .iiec within llnrty days of tlie in.solvency of the pur>oii against whose e.state it is registered i.s null. I'lnio- iii_luilire& McVurrnn, -li L. C. J. 174. .;i:». The registration of a livpofhec within f iirty day.s previous to an assignment iin.ler the insolvent Act, 1.S75, is without eitect, and especially when the iivijothec was giar.ted hv Ihedehtor while in.solvent to the kuowled.'e of the creditor receivingsuch hypothec. McGaw ran k ,S/cieart, H L. N. .12:!,"(.^ IJ. 18S0. 40. On a contestation arising out of the col location ol the j.arties on an assignee's divi.lend sheet-- //r/./, that a liyp.ithec given to the Cor- p..iation ol Three Uiver.s fur moiiey.s a Ivanced uud.'r authority of 20 Vic. cap. I'iO, does not reipiire registration in or.ler to preserve its privilege^ I'c/oquin k La ^oviele de Construe- tion fit. Jucjiien, :i L. N. 34.-:!, S. U. 1,S80. Xr. Ok I.M.MOVKAIII.ES. 41. Efect of.— The delendant was the pur- chaser Ol ail immoveahle which he caused to ho registered within thirty davsan.l t.jok posses.sion of 1 iv-vious, however, to the registration of such .sale the vendor gave a hyi«.lhec to plaintiff on the .same immoveahle, which was immediately registered in a.ivance of the delen.iant's .sale, though suh.sequently to his possession.- //t/,/, that the hypothec was preierahle to the .sale. Adam & ilandcrs, 3 L. X. 5, Q. U. 1879. XII. Of M.vrriage CoxTii.vcr. 42. Where hy a contract of marriage a piece llATroX. 648 KSTATOfl llOlliil'Ill'.s IiihIiuikI jrjvve )tu(p liriillici'siirn'-'ijori. wtitiiiioii In t'.iviir oi til,, t to H i;hiir;,'f 111' X'SOO, ^-t li)!' n-i|i()iiilcnl's liiis! .-o .-ulijna u> H Miilistj. ■ti'.HIlllihIlVII, Willi ri;r||.^ to will 111,. IWMlhlcl l.) lit, III; of ulii(;li ri'lllly IhvIIktm ilici, leaving i(imai>ii(liMit'H liiiHhanil, I'i^lit.s, BiouU/ard it 'ocil ofniort^iiij^o of tlio 'rtj;ii,;;c is nui siiiii,;i,.|,t i'l;,'aj,'flliiis iiicntiiini'il ly rcj^ixicreil, lu.r will iii'irt^'ajjee In; iiifcrrcl ' iiiDsi exprt-.s.-) con.-iciu 't'conii ijKii'tgairce van ; tiMiii llie iieccs.sitv ii.,swill »V: Jie.slrc iV /'/'tco.v/, 1 650 Kl'onnd Ihal re^'isier<'d nil the ln--inMiie( COnlesliiliMii. I vim 1 .1.1 . , . '*■ "'■^"<- « / /-t'Ci 1^. N. 1 10, ,V, lij h.c. .J. 51!, ,S. C. R. l,S7.s. XIII. Ok .Moiitiiaiji: ox .Mkiiciiant V'l-ssii «ec .MKUCll.W I' .SUJl'l'lNU ' Xill. Ok IJioiirs oi- Si'wk.ssiox. 41. Theri^dit of ,-lii!dren to Hucoee,! lo their ' '""■ ^ •-'"''■'■ '"'I'l'pi-'^IHTly of Ihe,. ninniiv a er li,.r d.^alli, ihoiiv'h i.nre;;iste,-ed, is ndt alUrleil l,y Ihe ic-iMriilioii ,,f a inort.^a",. .-iveii I'.viheir father s„l,.e,p„,,„ ,„ ,1„, death .7f h,! wile, notwilh-landui- anvlhni- coniained in article 2(1 ;s r. ('. />„//„/,• ,t fy;,,,,/, 2U C. 28u,.t2L. N. 15,g.Ji. 1.S7S; ti()7 (J. C. XI v. Of Sai.i;. lestant m ISM j a rp.^i,. „, „,„ ,,^,„, ,,^. ,,^^ _ oliaser to the deleiidaiit the lollowiii- uw, Vlie lirsi sale was re-istered in Is7(i j ,!„, ;,,,,,„„| ,„|e was never rem-iered, hilt Ih, delen.lant. in 1,>^74 >.'ave a iiiori>;ai.'e lo plainlnl, whi.di was diilv 'c-isteredatliel , and al-o aiiolherahont ih'e same fn,e.al-o, Inly re.msiered, to another of •Id l"v ,1 '""'";■'■ ""■'•"{•"" "Its con- St,, I |,y he widow ,)t the liiNi veiiih.r, vhoelaniied lor a halan.T of the huillmr de Jomh-lhl.l, that as the sec..n,l deed of sale was not iv.,-i,.,vd Ihal th.. morr..-a^res „„.,.,, Mider If ,hoi,.|irej:isler..d prior lo llaMv.-^iri - 'i"ii"llhel„.,tde,.d of sale, had no leun i ..,|,.el viiaiever. .\,i,,i,ly, Trr,„'d,>u S: h',l,i •' L \ I.', lint /»•/-/, at Ihe same tin,,., that as the I'lice ,.l the and must have lallen into the J''';iii;Mni„t.v which e.xisl,.dl,etweenherandl,er 1. isband that only a half helon.ed lo her in u.ilily ol legatee ami testamentary e.Meciitri.x. iiua ll>. S.V. I'llIOHITV OK, 45. Ill an actio . in declaration of a Iivpothec, f l'''"l^'l" I'l^'aded /»/,r «//,Mliat uUlie lime o ilamlill eluiiiie.1 he was jn op,,i and piihlic osMSMono Ihe land in .piestion as l,i., antenrs had heen helore him, and even if their title was ;i"t n-i,slered tiieir i,oss,.ss,oi, at Ihe lime of he ,v,i;ist,alion, under which plainliil claimed, . s .siilhcient to destroy plaint.lfs hvpolhec o, lie. and in miestion, her deed havin^' l,,.eii ej.'islered only in lS7ll, t.irty-threo yars alter IS exec,.tmn-/y,W, that the lv«istranoii at aiiv timeol a,le,., pass,.d before the Uej,'istrv Onion"- '>i'">,'<' ol 18-1 had the ellectof pr..serv,n./.lie Fivilej,.. o, tlie ven.lor as again.st a third lullder, IS ., ; ^'l'!'" "":' irnblic posse,ssioii. hnt wli, j has rejrislemi Ins title only after' the re-isini- ' ion "I the lir.st deed, imerl & Mtratioi, ol' his hypotiiec would nevertneless 'c collocated hv preference to a mort-ag.e who ';"' '■'"■'^'i«U''ed under the cadastre, l,i|i who.se 1 potlie.; was sul,,,,,,,,,,,, i „„., „,. ,^^ Ml ol tl„.,saul /„„/,,,„,. dejond, da uil.asai lliedaleo the insolvency the hiller's delav lo '■••new had not expired, and no renewal of r;..ri>,. ■■alioneonld have alU.cl,.d ihe lands afler ihev liad passol into the hands and po.sse.ssion of th'e assignee; and, even had such a reiU'Wal been i"a;e It would not appear by the ng,,,, ,.,.•„ c.lilicile. which III mailersofmsolvencv would only sh.iw registrations up to the dalj of the ataehment or ass,.„n,..n,, and not (as under ^ ■ JM/Iri r, ~Kl L. R. .Ml, Q. IJ. Ihth. .H. Ihe vendor ol an iminovealde iiroperty having regisiered the ,leed of sale ou the ;!Nt day Oi.ie .lay after the lliirlv ,lavs allowed bv art. 21001 of the Cvil Code) a creditor of the purcnaser obtained Iron, huii, an-l re.dstere.l "■ilhm Ihe thirty davs. a morfra-^e a.^ri-t tli.^ pruperty-yytA/, that the vendor's claim was pri- •A.- fo-n ai iimnovo,ililc< |,„v,. I,,.,,,, juliM,i„,.,i ,1,0 Blienl must precure ir,,,,, ,i,e resist,-,, -ot'iv. si, , lion dniMon ii, wliicl, em-l, in.im.ve, bl,. is Ji, .u ,i L cerllllc.te c,| tl„. liv,,„tliocB ul,ai«.-,l „|,',„, ..„ei ,1 , -,^ :il'l'' 1 iMil rcKisloioil ,1), t, the ,l,iy ..t Ule w lie -,' l lee e-tllbll^llea i,y elder uf ,1„. Mov..n,or n eoui eil "r ^^ clclr ercl,i,vfr,.s upon real estiUe. „U9 1 J-ei-oiis ceuvi.yiiig iiiiiiiovcables bv sale eift or ev. chiiMKe i,n.s,.rve „il tlieir liKbts iinU liH ^eL-ef "v re.Ms terniK ll,e ,le,.,i of alicatiui, within tin- v .[aj-s l^-o,;- u hit,., ev,.ii i,^-,„n.st p,.r,.,„H r.-^i.^-en,,;,/ ,i,Hr h', L' between lie .b.Ies ot such , .f,,,,,! „titH roK slruiioii ■ih.. iiRlit ol il.e vendor lo take b.,fk an LmmltXe Boduiihe ca,se of non-paymeiit ot ilie ir c" I.J, ",, ?£ allect rubse,ju..,it purchasers wlio have ',."'»,',. ,1 (he«is..lv™to.,Hh ught, t.nlesstlu. ,i,.e.l Iwl • t ,8 ipiilated ha.s been rexislered as in ord thi4e.SK the vendor in th is nuitler, as well iiiary cus,..-. ; never- as for aiufrT' '""' "'• •^'"'^'^•'"""K'ul'l.'lie delai-ol'thi seciirlii riy diiyn. I m m ■ Ml 23 m I p'ii' . C51 HKUGIOUS INSTITUTIONS. yilcj.'1'cl, 111,' li.v|i(illifairv crclilor's inorlL-iiifc lifiii;.' Hiihoiit cll.ct an l,.ini lis liix ilcl.1,,1'- liilc ;iNtt'ivil— y/,7(/, tliiil 111., sail' liad ini'- cci fniH' lit Ins livpotlici;, iioHviilist.in.iiii" llii- Jiiil;.'nifnt. T/ini/tr AcAiis,'lt \ .)f„ss 2 L S TCi ^^V., \. 3 L. N. 2i2, .t 24 1. (J. J. IM.S. C. k! Ini'J. 5:i. The rfiifwal of ft hypothec in virtne ol Ihe law i-lalilishiii- the .taihi-tre can onlv he made liy the imtiee jire-erilie.l hv .Vrl. 2172 of the Civil CiKle. h'nu.tsM Ai Bureau, 5 Q. L. 1{. Joy, .S. V. 11. IsT!). 51. And therefore a transfer ^:l■"'l■«^■■, ' RENT. I. Action fou. I I.''''F|?''^^" *""' """''^ LESSOR AXD JII. Kmi'iivteitic. IV. L1A1111.ITY FOB, weEXECUlluX, Ex- K.MI'TIO.NS. V. LiAUii.iTY OP Tenant who Pays in Au- VANii:, see LE.SStJR AND LESSEE. \ I. CoXSTiriTKI). I'rexcriiditiii of. VII. Life. I. Action for. a hou',, from plaintiff 57. Defendant leased for a year IVoin 1st Augu.i, rent" pavable monthly. On the 10th October he left it and took away all his things. None of the rent bad been paid. I he action -• as lor rent accrued iind lor damages equivaleiu to that to accrue— Held, that a judgment for so much Ibr rent due WHioaoevpr by threats or force unlawfully obs'.ructa or jirtvuhts, iir .-hileavors to obstruct or prevent, aiiv cloi;«ymiinor other iiiini-ter in or from celelmitiiii iliviuo service, or otbenviBu olllciatiiig in iiuv elm "li clmiiul. ineetiiiK-lKui-e, sehuoMiouse, or othe- place uid lor divine wnr.,|ii,i or in „r Iroin die iiurforni.iiii'o of bin liuiy in t !.• liiwlul liunal of tbe ileail in any chiiichyard or other burial place, or strikes or o ts any vi,.li.|.CL' to or upon any civil inocess, or, uiiiler the pretence of executing any civil prociHs arn-sts any cleroyman or u her niiiii.ster who is engUKeii in, or 10 the knowlclee 01 the olli'iiuer is uihiuI to enL-aKPiii, any of the rites Sr iluties in this Kectum alorcsaiil, or who, totheknonleii™ 01 the o lender, i^ gointf to perform the same, or returnliiu from the p,.riorniancr ifiereof, is yuilty of a ,ni,di- nieanor, aim shall be liable to be linprboiicd in nnv taol or place of oon linemen t other tlnoi a iieiiilentiurv for l'."^.}o7'; •'■''" t'""'t»" years, with or without hard labor. L. 61-ii \ 10. cap. 2iJ, ^cc, -Wi. t \Vho-in,r.er wilfully ilisturbs. interrupts ordisnuieta any a scmblace ol per .- met for reli-ious ivorship, or lor any inoraT, social 01 b-ncvolont pur|iose, bv or tano dlicoursc !>y rmie ,>r i;..i.-._..: behavior, or by iiu.i,iii^ a iioise, either within the place of such meeting or so near It as to di turb the order and solemnity of the meeliuii may b... ai .sled. a2-33 Vic. cap. 20, s J. 37. ""■'""''*' 663 RKPLICATION. : LESSOR AXD EXECUTION, Ex- am I to iH.ouine.liieivus j;o,).| williout nipniion ot .lanni|r,.H. rhn;iiijc v. lilaneliant, 2 I,. N' .«I,S. (;. |{. IH7!). OH. A Hciziirc for rout iiui yet iliie will he tmiiiitiiiii..,l, lMitii,)(;oiiilfiMimtioii L'rii!it('(| until RlliM- .he rent Iiuh hctiuhI. Joseph v. Smith, W li. N. 115, S. (J. IHHU. II. DKMAr.) OK, s,;: LESSOR AND LESSEE. 5!) Where the le.snee is in-olvent, the lensor «iint oMig,.,l to .l.'iMiiti,! luivim-nt of the rent U'lore h. M.>.'n.« an actio,,, riantt v. L'obitailU, 4 Q. L. R. 22u, S. C. 1H78, IIL Emphytei'tic. 60. The creditor of u,i ei,iphvtputic rent ],iis a rijrht ,,| ,u,,K,n in deelunitio,, ;,f |,iH hv.M.lhec where the p,„,,erty ha^ Keen s(,|,| at AwrhX\ Salesn,jeettol,,H rent, ,vlll,„nj;h „o ,„e„t,o,. i. „nde 01 ,t i„ the shenlf.. tille, a„.l ,„ snch ,M.e the sl,ent H.iile will he ,lecla,e.l foux. Ca>- pan/er Ai JJery, 8 R. L. 28;t, Q. R. 1877. Vf. CoXSTITI'lKl). a I he hie to anea,;. of /•«»/..v aml/i/,,-.,:; ,l„e >"P fo the time liie Cvil Code of l,o«er Canada came ,Mto fo,-.;e is that ot Ihir. wears, and , he pre>er,ption applicable to a,TeaVs"aoer,i..| since the Code that ol /i ve .V(.a,'.s. «,.//,„„,, ^ c/,„,/,,. 1S79. ^••^•■^■"^- ^-^^ 1-«.S.C. R. VH. LiKK. 62. Arrears of life rent accrued since the cuniing into force „f the Code a,e procrihed . 8 elm '''" ^- '''"^"""''' ■^ ^'- J- ■i''. RRQIJETK CIVILE. 054 inci'oitT. L Of Expkrts, see EXPERTS. liEI'OllTS AND ACCOUNTS. I. LiAiiii iiv KOB, nee CORPORATIOXS. ItKJ'liLSF. D'l.V.STANCE-.Si'e I'lJO- C HI) I Jit E. L Is Ai'i'KAi,, .ice APPEVL. UEI'R I ,S E MAT R I .M() \ [ ALE,^_,S\'e MAiiUlAUE CUNTltACTS. REQUETE CIVILE. RENUNCIATION. L Op j0uuM!iNT, Costs aktcr, see COSTS. REPAIRS. ping" ^''^^^^^' **« MERCHANT SIIIP- REPARTITIGN. I. Of Cotization- for EiiKcrinv of Pa«- sToNERsI^"^''**^'" FABRlyU-ES, COMMIS- REPEAL. I. Of Statutes, gee Acts of Parliamext. REPLICATION— 5ee PROCEDURE. r. Affii>avit fob. Jl. (■liOIXils OF. III. In Ai'1'|.;ai.. I. Affidavit for. C.!. Anallidavit to a petition for a nnuSte an/,'cmuu>\ he an,eM.h.d,hut the petition ,tself may heaniended, no allidavit liei,,- neces-arv to sup,,..,-, 'h petition l-oh-;,,,!, v. C.rhal/e & 1.. N. i:!0, Jt22 L. C. J.oO.S. C. If. Qroi'sk.s of. 64. In an election case-Z/cM, that a ju.Lre m chamhers cannot on petition corivct a final indgmenl in a cause an.l ,vn.lcr another .lU.lL'nienI on do.;iinientH which ueiv not in the .vc.rd at the t.n.e (he firs, j,„|..n,„.,„ was s'"c 1877 "■''""''' ^ Lanjeoin, !i IJ, L. 1 ■.!, 65. But semhlr, that a clerical error in an '"iitio,T''°76 •''"'"""'"^ "'"-" '^'" ""Tccted 0.1 W>. Whei-e, hy false statements, and,., con- sequence of the absence .jf certain receipts which had hee.i mislaid, a person obtained an onlerof fhecoiii-tfor the possession f certain jroij.ls beloiii;ing to an .nsolveiii estate, the iud.-- ine.i, uassef as„le on my«g/c' cidle. CU/.& SIcnut k nm/nrd, 21 L. C. J. 121, S C 1 ,7 U7. .1 >-r,,,„Veeii,Ue which does not on its fac-e came wi.lim iho pi-ovisions of art. 505 of .he C.Kleol 1 n>ce.l,iie t.my be rejected on motion. ^i:''c'tttQ:l??;7''''''"^"^'"''"'^'^" 68 Ajud.irment dul.v signed a-id paraphed by the jn.lge cannot be attacked by remiite CHv/e as being an incorrect copv of the mda- 210,' S. C ife^" ^^"^""^ ^ ^"'"'**' -^ ^- ^- ^• 69. Rcmiefpnimle will not lie t-, ^.^t asiiic a judgment on the ground of error in the draft II ■ i m ^ 655 RESPONDENTIA. III. In Appeal. li ■'; TO. Scmblc, tlmt a rerivSfe cirile will lie in apjjeal in certain oases. /,' 2L. N. 20(i, Q. B. Ir-'J , — ^...i^ ..... ,,v III tlampson v. Thompson, RESCISION. I. Of Contracts, see CONTRACTS. II. Ok Ukkds, .v,r DKKDS. Jll. Of Salk, nee SALE. RESERVED ..aSE. I. Canxot iiK Had WniioiT Tkiai. ok Con- viction, sec CKhMIXAl- .'iAW. RESIDENCE. I. Of Okkkxpaxt Shoii.d hkGivfn- in Whit. see PUOCHDUKE, Dksciuption of Parties. RESILIATION. I. Of Deed of Doxatiox, see DOXATIOX. RESILIATION. I. Of Sale of Moveables, see MOVEA- BLES. RESOLUTION. I. Of Sale, see SALE. RESOLUTIONS. L Ofsale ofImmoveahle, sec PRIVILEGE OF Vexdou. n. Of .MixiciPAL riiRcoiiATiox, see MUNI- CIPAL CORPORATION. REVIEW. RETAINER. I. Of Advocates, see ADVOCATES. RETENTION. I. RiiiHT OF, sec LIEN, PRIVILEGE. RETURN— .SV« I'ROCEDURE. RETURNING OFFICER, I. Liahilitv of, see REGISTRAR. 656 RESPONDENTIA— .Sfic AF- FREIG HTMENT, MERCHANT, SHIPPING. REVENDICATION. I. GitorxDs OF, .see SALE, Stoi-paoe ix Ibaxsitu. REVIEW. I. Aroimen't in. JI. As to Costs. lir. Costs ix, .we COST.S. ly. Deposit for Costs ix. \". (iiidi-xns OF !!kvisiox. \\. JIkARIXC of i'iiEI.lMlXARY ExCEI'TIOX. _ Vll. .liuLsnicriox of CouRT,.vee ,i L'RISDIC- rioN. VIII. Notice ix. IX. Of (.'lurciT Cdcrt .Ii iiu.mext. -X. PoHEU OF Court of. XI, liiiniT OF, [. Ariji-.mext in, 71. A respondent in review cannot conipol liiH udversiiry to arf:ue his appeal .sooner tliiui eijrlit 'iav.s alter llie dale of llie inscriplion Eastwood V. Corriveau, 2 L. N. 8, S, C R. IHVJ. II. A.s TO Costs. 72. Where a jndgnientwa.s rendered for plain- tiff lint with coslH ill liivor of deleii.laiit— //(7.? Ill review, reversinjr tlie iiidjinieiit as to costs! Hall V. Jhiyham, 3 L, N. 21!), S. C. R. 1880. IV. Deposit in, 7;i. The court will not order tlie prothonotary torelnnda depu.sit of $40 made hv a partv mider art. .J'.)7 C. C. P. to whom tliV ,leposit lias been reliiinjed on his siicceedinj: in review, altlioufih the jnd^'ineiit in review he rever,-ed, and the judgment reviewed he afterwards cstab-' lished 111 Its integrity in appeal. O'Favrel & Jinissurd, 4 Q. L, R, 9,), S. C, 1878. 74. A party inscribing in review is entitled to a return ol the deposit so soon a.s the jiidg- nient lias been reversed in Im favor. liousquet 657 REVIEW. REVIEW. 6^8 'liOCEDUEE. ol' tlio iiiscriplioii N. 8,S. C. li. iHTi). &Jlrmp,i, 1 L. N. 555, & 22 L. C. J. 2G0, S. C. _ 75. Tho deposit roqiiired on nn inscription in review cannot lie dispensei) witli hv consent of parties. Laperriere & Miiliial Fire [iLwr- c" R ^'87^'"^ "-^ Berthier, 24 L. C. J. 206, S. 7(). The amount of deposit in review is rp"ii- lated by the anionnt of phuntifi's deniund althou;;). tiie proceeding he in conjpiiisorv 8 .S c'r'i ^"^'""""^ '■'• C'«'''«''e«M, 3 L. N. V. Grounds of Revision. 77. A,jud};inent maintaining tlie taxation of an 8ssifrnee-s hill hv a judge in chamhers will no. be interfered with by the Court of Review except on very special' grounds. J/rtr.w» & Mawian & lirouillei, 22 L. C. J. 147, 8. C. R. io7o. VI. Hearing of Preliminary Exception. 78 In an insoription from a final jndginent wliicli referred in no way to a former 'interlocn- toryjui trment dismissing an exception to the form the question of the exception to the form cannot be entertained or reviewer niisoon- iiMca i,s not susceptible of revision. C/inrtrand et nr. cvp. & Lambert, S L. N. 77, S. C. R. 1880. 91. An inscription in review does not lie from an order of the Snperior Court authorizinj; a cnM'tor in insolvency under Insolvent Act, leio, sec. 08, to prosecute nn appeal in the name T l}"-\?r'?"f,^- , }^<'J"i'yer & Archambanlt, missin"' the action and maintaining the interven'^on" Grant & C/wren & Lavoie, S. C. 1877. RIPARIAN PROPRIETORS. C60 RIGHT OF ACTION— .See ACTION. RIGHT OF WAY. I. Use of, see STREET RAILWAY. RIPARIAN PROPRIETORS. I. Rioins OF. 93. Plamtiff- brought his action for the value of the u.seof Ins riparian rights by the defendant, who moored his raft opposite his propertv, ami obtained $10 a month tor every Rummer month 9.T. N."?i s'c.'mg."""'^" ^*''"''" * -'^""''^'•• 94. In an ..ction for damages and toobtain the deinolition ol a bridge constructed by the Corno- nuion of Quebec across the little River St Char es, on the ground that the bridge obstruc- ted the navigation of the river, and thereby aa.ised damage to the plaintiff' as proprietor of the riparian land; that another bridge existed a short distance higher up the river ; that the river w'as tida beyond the higher bridge and navie- able lor boats, floats and rafts, and that it was possible at e.xcentionally high tides to float harge.s as far as tlie higher bridge, but that the difficulties and risk which attended the naviga- tion of craft of that description were so ^reat that the river in its present .state did not a7linit of their use in a practicable and profitable manner! that the smallboats, floats and rafts could be navigated as before unobstructed by the bridge, although masted barges could not ^T^ '!■ "''^!'"""' lowering their masts; that the plaintiff 8 land was situated between the two bridge', and was used as a farm, but was not proved to have depreciated in value by reason of the bridge complained of, and the plaintiff was not proved to have sustained damage from actual interruption of traffic— i/«M, that 8. though there may be droit d'accis accordin.' to iM-ench law as It prevails in Quebec, riparian n-id IS like a house in a street whi?li, if inter- In M with, at once gives the proprietor a ri.'ht jf action, yet that right is confined to what a is expressed to be a right of «cc^,9, or the power of getting froni the water way and upon the land II. a Iree and uninterrupted manner, That such right had not, on the evidence, been violated, and that, supiKising the bridge coiii|ilained of to cause some obstruction to the navigation, the action could not be maintained in respect of it, «r! i" P''°°*' '^'' '^'^'^"''' ""'' speclr.l damage. Whether an obstruction amounts lo an interTe- rence with a riparian proprietor's accis and to his frontage, which is a private right by English us by French law, is a question of fact to be determined by the circumstances of each parti- cular case. According to French law, the test ol th navigability of a river is its possible n«» lor transport in some practicable and profitable ul'"n ^J-: , ^i^^^ ^ Corporation oj Quebec, 5 L. K. W4, r. C 1879. OPRIETORS. G60 mSee ACTION. F WAY. r RAILWAY. OPRIETOES. ^ action for the value gilts by the defendant, site his property, and every finminer month . Rehurn & Hunter, ages and to obtain the itructod by the Corpo- the little River St. It the briiige obstrnc- i river, and thereby in tiff as proprietor of ither bridge "existed a } river; that the river ir bridge and navig- ■afts, and that it was high tides to f^oat bridge, but that the attended the naviga- iption were so great t .«tate did not admit able and profitalile Us, Hoats and rafts jre unobstructed by !d barges coulil not leir masts; that the 'A between the two i farm, but was not in value by reason )f, and the plaintiff ained damage from .raffic— i/eW, that it d'accis according in Quebec, riparian eet whinh, if Jnter- B proprietor a right rnfined to wiiat it is cis, or the power of and upon the land lanner. That such ?, been violated, and complained of to he navigation, the led in respect of it, 1 spocir.l damage. luntH 10 an interfe- etor's accis and to te right by English stion of tact to be nces of each parti- •ench law, the test is its pc^sible use ible and profitable : oj Quebec, 5 L. R. 661 ROADS. RISK. ROLLING STOCK. 6(32 I. COXCEAI.MEXT OF, I.V IxSl'BANX'E, See I\SU- RANCE. RIVER RE.ACHES— fe RIPARIAN PROPJiiETORS. I. Ohstruction of. II. Rights Over. I. Obstruction of. 95. Action by respondents, proprietors of land at Lachine, against the appellants, a lum- ber firm, for having, about the Ist July, 1875, moored two large rafts optwsite their premises, on the beach of the River St. Lawrence, whore they remained, in spite of notitications to have them removed, until the middle of September, when the action was .servetl. Plaintiffs alleged that they had purchased some 67 acres of li?nd on the shore of the river, for the purpose and with the intention of dividing it .to buihling lots, but that the rafts inq'i-^ t- n bving moored opposite to it all sunune; .-w prevented (ice access to the property, R.i .hev asked that de- fendants be ordered tc ■ :■■ ve the rafts in question and pay $2000 damages. Defendants pleaded by demurrer that the St. Lawrence was a navigable river, and that they had a right to use It ; that the Harbor Commissioners had no jurisdiction over it; that they had permission to moor their rafts there, and in doing so had interfered in no way with the rights of the plain- tiffs, nor caused them aiiv damage. The proof was that the presence of the rafts there was cal- culated to diminish the value of the propur:,y obstructed by them, and that they were more or less ofa nuisance generally— i/cZ(Z,tliat the plain- tiffs had a right to demand that the rafts be removed, and a judgment coudeming the defen- danis to |30 damages and costs was confirmed. Dunning & Gimuard, 9 R. L. 177, Q. B. 1877. II. RiGilTS OVER. 96. In an action against the St. Lawrence Navigation Companv for wintering their boats in the mouth of the River St. Maurice within the limits ofa grant of water lots made to the plain- tiff by the QueliecGovernment-ZMi?, in appeal, reversing the judgment of the Superior Court, that theauthoiity of the Provincial Legislature extended to granting letters patent of the lots in question, but subject to the tacit restriction that they did nothing to injure or interfere with the requirements of trade in the use of the river. Aunnand v. La Cie. de Navigation du St. Laurent, 4 Q. L. R, I, S. C, & 5 Q. L. R. 215, & 10 R. L. 513, Q. Ij. 1879. ROADS. I. Acquired hy Prescription. II. CoMMissioNER.s OF, See TURNPIKE ROAD COMMISSIONERS. Hi, Prkscrh'tion ok. IV. LiAiiii.nY FOR, see TURNPIKE ROAD TKUSTKES. V. JjIAiUi.'TV OK Ml-N'iriPAI.ITY FOR RkPAIR OF, see MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. VI. What are, see MUNICIPAL CORPO RATIONS. I. Acquired bv Prescriptiox. 97. Where a road had been enjnved as s-ch for thirty years and upwards by the plaintiff, the defendant, and others requiri"ng to use it— Held, i\\a,l it was to be deemed a public road within the meaning of the 18 Vic. cap. 100, sec. 41. ss. 9. Parent & Dairile, 4 Q. L. R. 154, S. C. R. 1871 J So Tlieoret & Ouimet,4:Q. L. R. 250, S. C. R. 1878. 98. And every road opened and used by the public as such without contestation rjiiring the space of ten years and upwards, must be c7)iisi- dered as a public road, and to have been legally recognized as a public road within the meaning of the law. Mianerand & Lenari, 6 Q. L. rT 120, Q. B. 1879. "^ III. Prescription op. 99. The plaintiffs in their ca-jacitv of universal usufriictuaiy legatees of the late Etienne Guy, their father, claimed tlip propertv lb;niing Guy street, in the City of Montveal, from St. Joseph street .'oiith to a distance of 424 feet, and pre- teiiiled that the defemlantf:, the city, were ille gaily in possession of it. Defendants pleaded that the pnjperty had been for more than thirty years an open and public street, and that it wa.s as such in the possession of the defendants ; that the fatherof plaintiffs had himself intended the property in question as a public roail, and as the continuation of Guy street ; and that, in pur- suance of such intention, he had not transmit- ted It to his heirs with his other propertv, nor was it subject tc the partage of the property of the succession which took place in October, 1831 ; that for more than ten years before the institution of the action it was open to the pulilic as a street, and had been d>ily registered as such in the registers and archives of the city, according to the terms ofthe City Charter. By the evidence .t appeared that for more than forty years it had been appropriated to the pur- poses of a public street by the late Etienne Guy, pire, who had p'-eviously ceded to the cify that part of the said (Juy street north of St. Joseph street, and had even been regarded as such by the plaintiffs themselves. In the partage of the property referred to the property in quest'on was ilcscribed as a me projetie—Held, disn issing the action. (?»/)/ v. Le Maire, Les Ecliiiins et les Cilni/ens ile la Cit6 de Mou trial. 9 R. L. 284. S. C. 1877. ROLLING STOCK. I. Seizure of, see RAILWAY. ^1^ m k«i 663 RULE. HOOFS. I. T.iAHii.iTY von, .sw CONTHACTOUS KULE. KULES OP PRACTICE. m lUTLES. T A....S. W...S. Ko„ c ...M...., ... ''""'^ '''' rUACTICK ^'^^^^'■^''^^•-«- 1.JMm.kct,ox Casks, .«HLE CTION LAW. S. S U M IvI A ]{ Y F TITLES f. •, SATI.ORS SAISIK AHRKT SAISIKCON'SKHVATOIKH.... SAISIK GACKh'IK SA ISI K HE V HNDIC ATI ON . . . . SALAliY I'AOK . ()(>■) . (11)5 . (ili;') . (111.") . tlllj <>(ir> sen 001; COMMISSIONliKS. SCHOOL TAXE8 .' .'. SEALS SKCHETA ii Y-TKEASUUEil SKCI{ETI()N SKCUKITY SEDUCTION SEKiNlOKIAL UKiHTS SEI'ARATION I)E PATIilMOINE. SEQUESTRATION t;-),s 700 700 700 700 70(1 SEQUESTRATOR SKQUESTRE SERMENT J U Die I A RE..., SER.MENT SUPPLETOIRE SERVANTS SERVICE .';;'.'."" 700 SERVICES ' ■■ 700 SERVITUDES ■■■";■ 701 SESSIONS OF THE PEACE 704 SETTLEMENT 70;") SETTLERS " 70-, SETTING FIRE 70-, SETOFF ■■ 70-, SEWINC, MACHINES ;.'.'.'"" --O.') SHAREHOLDERS 705 SHARES 70--, SHERIFF ;.,.; 70-, SHERIFF'S REPORT SHEIUFF-S SALE SHERIFF'S TITI.I- SHIPPIN i SHORTHAND.... SICX NURSE SKiNATURE SHJNIFICATION .".' 707 sKiLi :■.;;;;; 707 SLANDER 707 700 70(; 7()(i 7oi; 700 700 70(1 :■> I SALE (;(;;i SALES 0!!:{ SALVAGE "..'.'.".■;; (I!).) (!!):i (I'll C.itl (lilf) (I;!", (IK.'j (;i).") (I'.m; OIKS PAfiK f^W»W -„7 SOClETf'. DE CONSTRUCTION 707 SOLDIKRS 7,/, SOLICITORS ;. 7,;h SOUS SEIN(J PlHVf': .'.'.'.""■ 70H SPECIAL REPLICATION ■" 7o,s SQUATTERS " 70U STAMPS STATUS, ST.ATUTES .. STEAMHOAT 708 701) 7IIS) COMPANIES 709 70!) 701) 701) 701) 701) SI'EAMIiOATS STENO(JRAPIIER '. STFN'OGRAPHERS' FEES STI';\()(iRAPIIY STOCK •... . SIOCK IN TRADE 700 STOLEN PROPERTY .' 710 stoi'pa(;e in transitu .... "" 710 ST0RA(JE 7 STRFAMS 7 ;vrREET RAILWAY 710 STREETS ;;:;:; 7 „ SUHLEASE SURPU'JNAS SUIiRO(}ATION SUBSCRIPTION SUliSTlTUTION ■ .'.' SURSTITUTIONS .'" SUCCESSION SUFFERING ". SUG(!ESTION '. SUMMARY CONVICTIONS ACT .'.■.■;."■ SUMMARY TRIAL SUMMONS SUPERINTEr.DENT OF PUlJiJciN- STRUCTION SUPPLIES SUPREME COURT...'. SURETIES ■, SURETYSHIP SUR VENANCE D' ENFANs". .". ."."" SURVEY SURVEYOR .".■;.■ SI'RVIVORSHIP SUSPENSION 711 711 711 711 71/ 7i:t 71:! 711 71.J 711 71 r, 71J 715 715 715 715 71H 71H 71H 718 7IK PRACTICE. (i64 LES. iKTiKs, sec UlJlLDlNd PK ACTIO K. , jfft liLKCTION LAW. 6G5 SALi?. SALE. G6G Pmk 707 IIUCTION 707 70H 708 ■ 708 ON 708 708 708 7011 709 NliOS 709 709 709 HI":S 709 709 709 709 710 "^ITir 710 710 710 710 710 711 711 711 711 •■ 71/ 7l;f 7i:t 714 711 DNS ACT 714 713 715 [•' PUBLIC IN- 715 715 715 715 715 \NS 71H 718 718 718 718 SA1I,()|{S. I. li.i.niKATMioNr (IK, .SVC MAIUTLMK LAW, SAISIE AliUK/i'— .S>e ATTACII- JMKNT. SALS IK CONSKIfVA r()IUE-S<;c AT- tacilmknt. SAISIE GAGKIilK -i'«?e ATTACH- MENT. I. Da.maciss Koii, wiii:n Nukdi.ks.si.y Lswricn, see DA MACES. SAISIE REVEN I )IC.\TI()N— ,SVc ArrAciLMj<;NT. SALARY. , Kcc MAS'J'l II. Of PuiiMu Oi-i-ici:us, ncc ATTACH- MENT. J. AfTioN FOR, nee MASTBIi AND SER- VANT. SALE. I. Action ij» Rksom'iion of, may iik I3Rlll'(;riT IIY TllAN.SKKItUKI.;. II. Aui'ioN to Co.mi'i.;i, Pubchasek to takk Dekd. III. HlKDINO. IV. JiY. Avr/idil. Viilli'cldf of Ciis/iimn. V. Co.siPiTi()>f Preckdent. VI. Dki.ivkky. VII. En Hi.„o. VIII. EvidTIO.V. L\. I''iiii Ci'sTums' Di'Es. X. I''0H Il.r.KIJAI, PUHI'OSKS. XL Foil Ta.\e,s. XII. KllAI'IU'I.KNT. All I. In FiiAiii OF Crkditoks. ^ May he A Itac.ked IncideiiUdly. XIV. Eiio.M HrsiiANi) TO Wife, ,' RIA(iE CONTRACTS. XV. Jl'DICJAI,. Adjnitication. Jf/r'-eiiifitf not fn Bill at. AHaiked on the (iioiind of Fraud, (jaliii'r dnH V/iiiri/fin. (Jolltication of C/'iiniK. t'oitditioiin of i-aiiiiot be Clmnijvd. Jkjirienry of tonleiUn. JJe.'.0UUHT KY 'TrANSKERREE. OF, MAY UE I. Uinlcrdic Cf'iilimu; de I'ari.1 i\\c Iniiisf'cnpe puie mill Hiiii|i!(> of a yj./.i; de reiile may I'.KfrciHc tiic notion I'll rvxoliiliiiii de rni/r (or (Iclaiill ot'paviii'Mit cithi'!' Iidal or I'.arlial. The aclidii ill rc-oliilioii ol llic nalc may al-o Im liroHjllit, fiir d'faiit de jimtalloii of a ciin- stitiilcil rent, pi'ici' of an iiniiiovcalili', cvci! liy till' seller wlic liiiM .Miicd f(ir ihi. iiavinciit of llio price. ,St. Cur & MiUHle, 3 Q. L."li. ;ii;9, S. C. K. 1877. II. Action to Comi'ei. PriiciiASER to take Deed. 2. Tiicaclion wa.s brought liy Faulciix and others to conitiel JaclcHoii to lake a d ■(•(! (jf two Idl.s of hind on the Lachinc, Canal wiiich he had lioii;,'ht at public auction. The niim- bei-M of (he IoIm as piirciiaHed were 17 aiKJ .10, and vvi^'ro B|>(.rili<.,| to be in tlie parinh of .Mor.t- I'eul. ThiH puixdiase was Miaiie on tlie ordinary conditioiiM. Jack.son rel ised to Migii. and after jyour parlern the plaintiU's decid(;d on a draft of ' \l F' ,1 if ; i M m 667 SALE. SALE. 668 dct'.l, to which they requirc^l the defemlnnt'fl si;.'imtiire. hi this (lee(J tlie lots were called 17 fiiKl 42, instead of 17 and iO—flehl, reversini' tlie jmiirnient of the court helow, that there wa.^less (lilhcultv here in maintaining the action than in -i'W/s'i'. le, 1 L. N. M,& 22 L. C. J. 229, Q. ]}. 1877 ; di Vic. cap. 6, sec. 13, 8s.4. ingfl in the cause be stayed until the plaintiff delivered to him the said patent. Plaintiff answered that the obligation to furnish letters patent within one year from the date of the deed of sale did not constitute an obliqulioii pre- jufhcielle to the demand of the plaintifV, which could be the subject of a dilatory exception— JleUt, that the exception was well founded. Bm- chaniv. Thivicrge, 4 Q. L. R. 152, C. C. 1878. VI. Delivery. V. Condition Precedent. 7. Plaintifl'sold to defendant the south-west liall of lot No. 4 ill the 7th range of the town- ship of Ihetlord, in the County of Megantic, for the sum of $yuO,$100 of which was paid at time of sale, the balance pavable in vearlv iiistal- iiienis until final ijayment. Bv the dcell of .sale the vendor obliged him.self to deliver to the pur- chaser the letters patent of the said half lot of land within one year from the date thereof, lie having acquired tlie same from the Crown tands Department. Defendant being sued (or one of the said instalments, pleaded by a di atory exceiption that the plaintiff had not (ulliiled the obligations incumbent upon him bv the .sai,! deed, vi.-., within one year from its (late to deliver to defendant the patent of the land in question, and asked that all the proceed- 8 On the 16lh of April, 1875, the defendants sold to the plamtitfaiotof land in Montreal llie deed contained the usual warranty of ven- •fors under the law. The price was paid in cash, and the deed duly registered. The purchaser on attempting to take pos.session, was met bv one It. who as,sertedan adverse title, whereupon lie notified his vendors through a notary, and required them to fulfil theircontract, protesting foral lo.ss or damage; and on their failure to oomiily, he brought action to get possession together with all damages resulting from the lue.xecntiou of their obligation, or else to get back the price and the damages. The defen- dants pleaded a defense en fait, and also an exception, setting up in substance that G was an " usiirpateur," with whom the purchaser had to settle the matter, and that they have nothing whatever to do with it, the mere mss- ingof Ihedeed having given the purchaser by law sutKcient delivery, in the dceii given by lie Corporation, that body declares it was legally seized and possessed of the saiil lot, liaving acquired it under a good and siitticient title; hut It did not say from whom. Thev urthersaid in their deed that "the said lot oY land IS marked and described on the olHcial plan and book of reference as belongim' to C (} although it wa-, at the time of the execution of' the .said plan and book of reference, the proiierty and 111 the (wssession of the Corporation." The question, apart from the danuiires which are put III issue by the(Z«/t'/).?^ en fait, was whether the vendors had fullilled the'ir legal obli^atinn under the deed— y/W(/, tliat they had not. ' " La delin-aiir. ,'st la translation de la chose reiitlue en la puix.iance ei jxi.wcssion de Vachelenr." (141)2 C. C.) How was the thing .sold here put into the puissance of the purchaser? What was It he got into his puissance' It was not the thing that h.iil been sold, forG. prevented thai • It was an obstacle that he got,— an obstacle known to the vendors, and which thev them- selves mentioned in the deed, and reiterate is an unfounded claim ; yet not only ilo they not ex- clude tlieir guarantee, but they formally give it. ' • L'obligatinu de delivrcr est remplie de la part du vendcnr, Inrsqu'ilmet I'ac/ieteur en possession actuelle de la chose vendue, oh consent qu'il en l)renne possession, tons obstacles 6taient ^cartis." (1493 C. C.) How could the vendors pretend here that " tons obstacles ^taient (cartis " « They state themselve- this obstacle of Gareau's appa- rent and recorded possession, which they treat as an unfounded one on his part; and they can- not pretend that they did not know it, or that they did not guarantee against it. The peace- able po.sso.ssioii ol the thing sold is the lirst ob- ject of the vendor's guarantee. The principle 18 the same under the old law and under the E. 668 ed until the plaintilF 111 patent. Plaiiuitf tion to t'uriiisli letters n the (late of tlie deeil e an ohlii/alioii pre- r the plainfitr, which dilatory ex<;ention— as well fbuniled. Bnu- R. 152, C.C. 1878. 1875, the defendants f land in Montreal. ual warranty of ven- rice was paid in cash, oA. The purchaser, session, was met bv erfe title, whereupon rough a notary, and r con tract, protesting 1 on their failnre to 1 to get po.ssession, resulting from the ition, or else to get mages. The defen- i fait, and also an bstance that G. wa>! hoiu the purchaser a.nd that they liave li it, the mere pass- n the purchaser by the deal given by y declares it was sed of the said lot, good and sufficient 'rom whom. Tliev lat " the said lot o'f bed on the official I belonging to C. G., of the execution of 'rence, the property Corporation." The iniiiires which are i/u conncnl qu'il en es itnieiU ^carUs." ! vendors pretend nt^curUs"^ They of Gaveau's appa- wliich they ireat irt ; and they can- t know it, or that it it. The peace- >ld is the tirst ob- e. The principle iw and under the 669 SALE. SALE. f.TO new, though the Code Napoleon puts it in better words (Art. 1G25 C. N.) ; " La i/aranlie que le vendeur doit a I'acqna-eur a deux objets : le premier est la paisihle possession de 'la chose vendue." Judgment reversed, and plaintiff al- lowed to get back the price and $112 damages, unless put in po.ssession. Cox & City of Mont- real, S. C. R. 1877. 9. The action was for the price of goods pur- chased in St. Louis by one Pierre Poulin, of Montreal, and conFigned to appellants. J. Poulin, who accepted delivery of the goods, but refused to accept a draft for tlie price or pay the amount of the purchase money. The draft was bv Pierre Poulin, renuesting them to pay the con- signors (respondents)— //eW, that bavin,' accepted the goods, they could not refuse to pay. Foulin & Williams, 22 L. C. J. 18, Q. 13. 1877. 10. In an action to set aside a deed of sale as made in fraud ofcreditors— 7/fW, that absence of debverv was only a jjresnmption of fraud, and might be rebutted bv other presumijtions equally strong. Bell & Richabu, 3 Q. L. R. 243. Q. Ij. 1877. 11. Under a covenant to sell and convey " all the estate, right, title, interest, claim or demand " that the vendors had in certain lots specified, an action tordamages cannot be maintained against the vendors for failure to deliver the whole of the lots mentioned, where they had included by mistake a lot to which they had no claim. Fulton & McDonnell, 1 L. N. 531, Q. B. 1878. 12. The respondents purchaseil bv notarial deeugh his title be posterior in date, provided, however, that bis posaossion bo lu good faith. 1U27 C. C. the cord. 1877. Lalonde Si Drolet, 1 L. N". 2!), Q. B. VIII. EVICTIOX. 14. The production of a registrar's certificate, showing that mortgages are registered against the property purchased, which mortgages do not appear to have been discharged, is sufficient to su|mort a plea of fiear of trouble under art. 1535 C. C, but in such case the balance of purchase money which the buyer has yet to pay on the property is the onlv "amount for which he can claim security. Parker & Felton, 21 L. C. J. 253, Q. B. 1877. 15. The purchaser of a piece of land who had paid a fourth of the price down was sued for in- terest on the balance, and pleaded the existence of a hypothec of a much larger amount than the balance, against which he had a right to retain not only the principal but also the interest to the amount of the fourth paid— i/cW, that, not- withstanding Hijde V. Dorion,* a purchaser under such circumstances cannot retain the interest money, not even as a set-off" of money already paid, as he has no right to recover sucii money. Hoi](rn et al. v. Bernier, 21 L. C. J. 101. S.C.&S.C.R. 1877. 16. In a deed of sale it was stipulated that the purcha.ser should have the right at any time to keep in his hands the whole or any part q\' the balance payable to the vendor, until such lime as the vendor should have furnished a regis- trar's certificate showing the property sold to' be "free and clear of all mortgages, dowers or other encumbrances whatsoever." It appeared that pait of a small island which was included in the property sold did not belong to the vendor, and there also existed a right of passage over the rest of this island, The island was of small value— ife/(/, that the purchaser was not enti- tled under the alove cited clause of the deed to retain an instalment of the purchase money sued for, there remaining unpaid anotherinstal ment which was much more than sufilicient to cover the proved value of the island and the right of passage. McDonnell & Goundru, 1 L. N. 50, & 22 L. C. 221, Q. B. 1877. 17. Where adelendanl pleaded fear of trouble or eviction, and the plaintiff' with his special answer produced deeds showing that the mort- gage complained of had been discharged before the institution of the action— i/t/(?, that as the deeds were not registered they couKl not remove the cause of fipar of eviction, "and delendant was justified in pleadimjas hedid. Noel v. Gaqnon, 5Q. L. R. 218, S. C. R. 18711. 18. And held, also, that he could do so by a plea to the merits, praying that the plaintiff's action be declared prem'alure and be dismissed, unless within a time to be fixed by the court the plaintiff' either cause the mortgage to hv dis- charged or give the delendant security to keep him harmless from such mortgage. lb. IX. For Customs Dues. 19. Where plaintilF, being indebted to the collector of customs tor customs dues, translerred .v: I 'J, l« I 1 ' 'ii 1 » Vide Dig. p, 1165, art. 84. r C71 SALE. SALE. 072 ll ;;!■ It < n qnantity of jToo,|a as security for the paviiieiit ot llip ilclit, and the delav liaviiicr expire.l the collector |m.(tep,leil to sell-//,./,/, that he hii,l a perfenl n-ht to ,lo so, aiM ,har the iihiiiuitr T }' 'J;'";,';vir to nomplaiii of. .««.«.// Sc Simp.,0,1, I L. X. 64, S. C. 1877; ;il Vic. cap. (), sees. 1,) X. For Ii.leoai, Pl'ri-oses. . 20. Action for$l 12 for liqnorsoM to (lefeii. hints in the (.oiir«e of bii-ine.ss. DpfendantM picale.l that the ii((nor was for an illeaal pnriKisp, viz., for the purpose of corrnptin;; ;lie electors of the County of Beancp, which wa.s proliiliited l)v law as contrary to piihlic order, and tiial to the know edjre of plaintiff-. The question was one of evidence. In the Superior Court (he action was disinissed without costs, hut, in appeal— ///'AZ, tliatilelciidant had failed to prove that the plain- tilts knew the piirpo-e for which the liquor was intended, and action maintained with costs Couture v. Delen/, 7 R. L. 577, Q. B. 187i;. XI. I-'OR T.iXK.S. 21. A county niunioipalitv and a villai^e niuniciiiality, defeiKhints, were parties to certam proceediiiL's resultin;; in a form of sale to the other defendant of part of two lots of land he- Jon^'ins; to plainlitf, on the j^round that munici- pal ta.'ce.s were due upon them, and that tlie owner was unknown. It appeared that there were certain lots owned hv the latherand certain lots owned hy the son, both heini? of the same name, and tlie corporation bein>; unalile to dis- cover which was which made a new roll in which the pn^prietor was described as incounu. defendants pleaded that the plaintirt' was pre- sent at the .sale and did nothing tooppose it, and there was therefore ac( 1 11 ies.jence— //«(,;, that the sale was altogether irre<^nlar and invalid, and j)laintirt'',s pre,sence at it could not atVect its valiuitv in any way. ,Smart v. Wilson, 2 L. N. 26, S. C. 1S78. XII. Fk.\udu/,knt. 22 Action t( annul a deed of sale to defen- dant by her father, who was in.solvent at the time action broufrht. The sale was made on theI8th May, l,875,and the insolvent made an assio:nment on the (Jth November, 187o. The consideration stipulated in the deed was alto- gether about $8,700. The property in 187:i was valued at S12,500, The action was taken bv the assifriiee to liie estate of the father under the Insolvent Act, l875-/ieW, duhitautr;, set- ting aside tlie sale. Ecaiisv. Pauje, 2 L. N. l.-|), \lll. Tv ri'RAui) OF Creditors. 2.!. Action by an assignee, under the provi- sions of the Insolvent Act', 1875, to recover back trom them a quantitv ofiflue obtained bv them from the insolvents frandulentlv, and in con- templation of their insolvency, "or the value of said glue. The facts as alleied in the declara- tioii, as it, i« contended, are that on tiie 1st April, 1874, the insolvents, being indelited to the deleiidants in the sum of $420, for the price of glue purchased from them, -ave the dei'...,- ilants their note for that sum, payable f,,i,p months afip,. ,laie, at the Bank of Uri'lisl, .VmiIi Ameri.a. On the 10th April. 1874, they -rave he delendaiits another note for $551 .4(;,'p''ivi ble at the same date and at the same Bank also tor glue purchased. These notps were discount- ed by the defendants at the Bank of jinii,|, .North America. On or aliout the l!)ih Mav 1874, the insolvents transferred and delivered' by way of payment of the above-mentioned iti- ilebtedness, to the delendaiits, a quantitv of -liie ol the value of $1055.42, whereupon the defen.l! ants took the notes of the insolvents, althoii.r|, thev hail been discounted, and could not hiue become due for nearly three months, out of the Bank, and hamled them back to the insolvents at the .same time -iving the insolvents their own notes for the diirerence and for the iirice of another quantity of ghie, which thev, at or ahoiit the same time, purchased or pretended to purchase from them. The sale of glue took place on the lUth May, and the assignment in iiLsolvency on the 7th .lulv. The delendunts pleaded ignorance of the position of the ins,,l vents and perfect good faith on their own part. —HM, that though the circumstances were suspicious it was not; siilKciently .so, considprin" tiip high character of the tirm, ilefen, hints, t,j c laracterize it as fraudulent. Wliiite & Mo- Arlhur, Q. B. 187G. •' 24. Plaintifl' having ajudgment against deltMi- daiit .seized three lots of land as belon.'iii.' tj him, when appellant filed opposition ''to''tiie ■seizure of one of the lots, claiming that it had been sold to him by defendant. Tiie other two lots sold. Plaintitl', after the opposition had been filed, tailal and his estate was taken possession of by an assignee. The plainiilf then .-ave security, and contested, vi\wn—H:ll, that" tlie proof being that defendant was notoriously in- solvent when he sold the land, to the knowled-'o ol the opposant, opposition dismissed. Pacmd & ffuKtou, 8 R. L. I(i9, Q. B. 1877. 25. A deed of sale cannot be annulled and set aside as made in fraud of creditors on a con- testation of an opposition, unless demanded by 2 be contestation. Blouin & Lanaelier, 3 Q. L. It. (2, S. 0. R. 1877. 26. But where the evidence establishes that the deed was made fraudulently, and is only up held on the ground of such technicality, costs Will not be ordered against the party coii'testing. 27. Action tore.scind asale by defendant to L., to hiH son-m-law, the otherdefendaiit, as maile 111 traud of the plamtitf, a creditor of L., tlie father-iii-law. Proof that the .son-in-law was in the habit of doing business for L.,and knew bi- lore the pa.s.singof the deed attacked that L., his lather-in-law, was indebted to plaintitl'; tliat, with the exception of a lew dollars' worth, he had no other property than what was sold by the deed, ami that he was, in lad, in.solv-nt. It also appeared that L., the father-in-law, had continued in possession of the property thus sold to his 8011-inlaw, not only withoul paying rent, but even without having agreed to"pay iim'—IM'l, sufficient to OMablish a pre- suniption of fraud and simulation against both delendants, especially in the absence of proof of the employtneiit of the money which 673 SALE. SALE. G74 the deed mentions as having been paid for the property nurchiised. Action nmintiiined, anil (K'cd set aside with comIh. Clarke & Lor lie , A Q. L.R. 2',):), S. C. H. 1878. 2H. Action by the uswignee of the in.=olvenl f-tule of M. C. against the sister of the in- solvent, to set aside a pretended deed of sale as executed lielween tlieni on tiie IDtli of Novem- ber, IHTr), in fraud of llie creditors. The sale «as Mot made within tiie thirty days preceding tiie instdvency.biil the proofwas tliat the vendor kncH he was hopele.-siy insolvent at the time, and mentioned in Ihedeed the object ol niaking the liaiisler. Judgment for plaii'itit}. Courts. Ciirillir.r, S. C. 18T.S. ^'i*. I'lainlitfi.btained judgment against tlelen- daiii, Ji., l(irf.s(),iiiieresf and costs, ii;alclmrge 01 li. ; and fuither in consideration ol $0(10 to be paid, of which sum 15. acknowledged to have le- ceived j;;5U0 previous to the .-ale, the other 4;:!0() to be ]iaid to plaintili' in si,\ annual pay- ments of ^50. Action to set asiile this sale as miide wiih a view to detraud B."s creditors and plaintiirin purliciiiar. Action also includ- ed tlie setting aside another sale of a mare made lielween the delendantp tor thesameolyect, the price ot the mare beitig StiO. Tiie aver- ments of the declartition were that both these sales were made lor a price much below their viilite ; that the iiurelia>er was a cuusine of 15. 's, and without apparent metiiis ; tliiit she knew of thee.xislence ofliie plaiiituf'sclaim ; that bv the (■ale the delendaiit 15. was placed in a stale of utter insolvency, to the knowledge of the other deiiiidant, the piii'cha-er, who knew that he liad no other property, which fact had also been es- labli-hed by a return ol luilla doiia to a writ ol execution issued at the instance of tiie plaintili. riaintilfasked that both sales be cancelled and set aside, as made in fraud of the creditors of H., unless the del(:'iulants paid to the plaintifl' the atiiouiit of his debt and cost- and .'$100 damages. I'rouf that IJ. had no other jiropeity but tliat sold, and that the other tiefen.dant 'must have known of his insolvency, as the judgment of the plaintili which remained unsatislied was men- tiuned in the deed between them. The iiroperty had been sold lor a price much about its value — y/t'/f/, that the sales were made in fraud of plaint ill', and must be ,sei aside as regards liim. Clement & Ciitafanl, 8 K. L. G2I, S. (J. 1878. •'50. (Jne v., an hoteikeeper, being largely in- debted to the appellant, a notarial deed of sale was passed betwfen them and duly registered, whereby F. sold to the appellant, with right of redenii)tion within three year.s, certain moveable and immoveable property, couiprismg the hotel aiiil furniture, being the "bulk of his estate, lor a certain stated valuable consideration. F. re- mained in possession of the property underlease Irom appellant, and continued to carry on hi.s busmess as usual. About ten months afterwards he became bankrupt, and respomlent was ajipointeJ his assignee. In the meantime app.ellant. had, with F.'s eoiHent, granted a lease of the tiioveables to T. and J,, in whose hands they were when respondent reveii- dicated them as part of F.'a insolvent estate. T. & J. did not contest, hut appellant intervened, and claimed the eflects under the deed of sale above mentioned. 'I'he respondent contesting prayed that the deed of sale lie annulled and set aside as having been made in fraud of F.'h crl^^itors— //f/,/, that under the circumstances, reversing judgment of Q. 15. "cient evidence to jjrove tliat the Hduijue . N: 102, .S. C. li. 1870. Iiy the insolvent some three to his insolvency, as made in fraud of tors. The property wlmdi was there was su object of the transaction was to deleat F. s creditors generally, and therefore the deeds of sale and lease of lOlh .January, 1875, were null and void under Art.s. lO.'CS, 10;S5, 1040 iV: 00:5 of the Civil Code, and sees. )st; ife h,s ,,1 Ins. Act, I8(i!l, ii ,si.c, ;(, .-.». l;! „l In^. Act, 1875. ;il. \\ here a sale is attacked as made in fraud of creditors it should be by direct action ami not by garnishnient of the purcha-er. La Ban " " ' ... 1 .'52. Action by the assignee to an insolvent estate to annul a sale ol an immoveable, made ome three months lai'viotis 111.- credi- ... very valuable was hypothecated to dillereiit persons to the amount of $t;,')00. The .-ale was to a hrother of the insolvent, and was made suljecl to the charge of jjaying not only the hypotliecs but sums due to the relatives ollhe iii.-'olvent to the amount ol !?2,501, and subject also to a riglit of reinere. The property, which was worth more than the total of these charges, remained m the actual possession of the insolvenf who, it was shown, had had repairs made, and dune other acts of proprielorsiiip since the sale— y/r/7, that the ,-ale must be presumed to have been made in conlemplatioM of insolvency and in iraiid of tlie insolvent's other credittu's. Iir((i>i ic Uu<:rtU; ;5 L. N. ;5S)8, .S. C. U. 1880. ;5:5. May be Attacked Licideiitalh/.—Ow the l.'ith November, 1,S77, one Mad. Fourmer, a debtor oi appellant, .sold a piano aiiti uliier articles to the value ol .■?128 to the respondent in payriient of a debt due by her to respon- dent. The appellant, being inlbrmed that Mad. Fotirnier was making away with her things in Iraudof hercreditors, isbiieil a. vuM'/e «;■(■(■/ in the hands of respondent who declared he had nothing. In his answer to contestation, however, he admitted that he had the piano, lint alleged that he bought it from delendaiit, and°he produced a writing sous ne.inij price liy which tlie piano and other articles were sold to respon- dent by lielendant in payment of what she owed h\\i\—llel ciirrv livpt.lhfi; ami init ivhI — //Wi/, on iiclion on tlicLond. ri'veivin;.' ilicjn(l>.'rncMt oltlii' Siipt- rioi- Court, timl s.icli Ijotid w;ii without k'j.'al corisidtTulion, aj,'aiii^t |)iililic order, ami llii' huvs i-p^'ulatinu; llic o(Iii-c the costH of tlie ihcl erfoflbi'liie viMnluiy, i>n," will not entitle ;haMiT (i)r hiicIi ucnn- nd efpeciillly ho win'ri Led by the" vemlirs. L. 0. J. ifi;{, y. H. «.■(.— Where tlie pro- rirt'olim iininoveiihle eiiviiiis ill Cull of tu' i aiiie kindolprivileyc iirH of cen.i et n-ntus )( the griiui de .luhnti- rreai'H accrued .since, ^1 pro rata lietweeii llie atnuiints ol their lion ik Christie, 21 it he Changed. — The kiire ol' an iuiuiove- ect to the condition, 111 have the riijljt to 8 a sixth of the pnr- iiig of a certain suli- ■operty. Appellant iioiint, lesH the .sixth ent, ill wliose Divor petition asking that le said sixtli of the lilt way, or, in other ■ property, and that I to jiay ft 'm—Held, lango the coiulitiona if the adjudicatdire. L. 102, Q.U. 1870. /(/.?.— Deficiency of lold by sheriir.s sale aUiire to demand a proportion to the ;s it must be shown been deceive. 1, and knowing wliat the ciiased ; and where been described by licli the purcha.ser II was dismissej. 2:U,Q. B. 1877. H property .«old at lie property did not ,s de.scribod in the iiientH, filed opposi- ticiency on liie bul- u<:C(dH in the biuids ' sale and adjiuiica- ' the contents, and I'cUetii'r V. Chasse , S. C. 1877. rty. — Under a writ in a suit wiierein G. wa.s lielendaiit, ed, advertised and the Ibilowing de- SALE. 678 roription i— " Four lots ofland or emplace- nietits situate at Coteaii St. Louis, in the ' parish L-K,tJ\,„t J,:i,i.i, heretnloie lormin,- ^1 part ol the narish of Montreal, in the di.stnc7 ol .Montreal, being known and designated in the ulhcial plan and book of relerence of the " village of Coteau St. I,uuis, in the said parish ol Montreal, under the Nos, li<, 1 '), 20 ami 21 " «J| the siibdivinioii of No. 1117 of the said " ollicial plan and book of relerence, with 4 ',', **''^'"'t''i ,'ii';''' '"" °' "tatute amending the ?h w.^ .,? r'.= provided however, that anotice indicating 1 „■ I, .""'"bers ot the pronerties desciibed in Hit titles shall havi. hB(.,i given, within six month- from Hie pa.-sin« ot the (.resent Art, to the reciatrars of sn ch t C. C. p. 638. given notice of his motion before filing bis op- position- //cA/, that, as his claim was not Iiroved III the record at the time he gave notice, his motion must he rejected with costs. Franer V. Caranf, 4 Q. L. K. 224, S. C. 187s. 48. But a hilse bi.lder is not relieved from his liability by a -ubsei|iieiit liilse bill, nllhinigli higher than the llrsi, and sntlicient to cover the Hr-t bid with interest and the costs incurred on the resale. Jilai.s A Lemmonth A; Uowen, 4 y. I.. K. 25I,S. C. R. 1878. 111. Liahiliti/ of Adjudiralaire.—Thr appel- laiit was the purchaser, al sheritfs .--al o| an immoveable whiidi hail been the subject of two acts of donation to the person in wliose hands It was seized and sold— one subject lo a stib- stituiion, and one ten years later, makin" no reference to the substitution. When the" ap- pellant purchaseil he was not aware of the existence of the snb-liitition,aiid on discovering It refused to pay tiie imrchase mnnev— _//«/lieritrs sale praying that iii- a.smuch as the property was describeil as con- taming 5U acres more or less, and upon mea- suiement proved only to contain 40 acres, the price be reduced in the proportion of such delicicncy— y/e^/, that by law the adjudicataire ol an immoveable at a sheritl's sale is without any warranty a-- to contents, and the adjudi- cataire purchase ji;e/' reiuritionem a.m\ no't per mensuram. Ih,u,,la.-i v. Domjlas ii LeSeminaire, .ly. L. R. 1!»7,S. C. 1877. 51. The case raised a question as to the validity of a sherJl's title. A writ of execution was issued Ih.tn the district of Quebec to the sherilfof the district of Montreal lo .seize lauds in the district ot St, P'rancis. It is alleged now that the sale by the slieritl' of Montreal of lands lying in the district of St. p^'ancia was Illegal and null. At the time of the seizure and sale the district of St. Francis had been duly organized, with a slier tf tor the district. 1 be Court was of opinion, tlierefore, that the sale byThe sherill ot Montreal wa.s, under the circumstances, utterly illegal ; that he had no right to seize or sell in 'the ilistrict ot St trancis. This being so, the adjudicataire re- mained without title. This qikstion had al- ready been decided by the Court of Appeal some years ago iii the case in which the writ to seize this land was issued. On that occasion the court unaiiiniously decided that tlie tille Iruni the sheritf was a perli-ct nullity. The saniejiiilgment must be reconted here. The title conferred no right up..n respondent, and he could not claim to be the proprietor of the land. Perkins & Aye. Q. B. 1876. 52. In .fune, l,s7:i, the plaintifl obtaine.1 jiide- ment for «2'J8l.48 against the defendants, and upon a writ ol renditioui exponas de ierri.'f, issued on the 20tli, 1874, lot No. 1163 of St Ann s ward ot Montreal, with buildings seized as belonging to Louis Burre, we.s .".iJMidsred ;■,•;■'■ sold to tile 'appellant. The property 'had beeii given to Louis Barre by his father by deed of gill ol the Oth April, 1857, and duly registered on the i)th March, 1851), but it was charged with ft M I ♦ i^ $ i :m 679 SALE. SALE. 680 ^i b r 1 1 ! il aNiilHtitiition in lavor of tlip (Ioucp'h chiMron bum mi,i I,. 1„. K,ri,. Wiicn the appt'lliint pur- Chuscl 111' was Motiuvurrolll.i. exiMtciicc <.l' tliin »ul.«liuiii„ri. inn (li-,-oviTci| it Mwirtlv iilliTwiirdN iiiM tlicii rfluHed to piiv tlu' piii^dia-f hk.imv an.l (H.iMplcto the Hal.'. I'hmiliir on tlie 17il, UoluhiT, |S71, pri'M.ril.'d a pciiliori lor a resale. Appelhilil cuMteste.1 thiM petiii,,),, alle),'iii.' ih" HilliMiliitii.M alM.< ■■ „iio I, an, I pU.adm.Mh^ the ^llenll's Mill ,id „ot di.se,luir;.'e llje ijnmertv hum It ; that he wa- e.Vi.o>e.l and Pahh' l,. eviJ- tiuii hy leaHuii of II ; and ha.l, (H.ii-e.pienllv, a rijihtlud.Mmiid lheva(;atin;,'.,f theadjii.Mealloii, ui.d ivu'' enlitle,! ., s,.t up Mieh ri-ht in answer tuaml haruf the phuiilill'.H appheiitiuii fur a I'esiile lor lal-e luddiii-; and pnived Ihal the.sile uiiil iidjiidiealiuh iiiiiWe U, hiin'-hunld he de- c aivd null and void, un,l he vaeiile.l, and that he sliuiiKl |„. dischar>;ed from all liahihtv hy reason oi In.s piirehase, and the plaintillVnetl- lun rejrcled-//,/,/. reversin- the jnd-ineni „( tlie Superior t'oiirl, that he was jn-lilied in de- limNdiiit; tlie nullity of the sale if he was ex- posed to Irouhle, without heln;; uhlii;e,l to prove that he was exposeii to certain eviel ion j and that ilie court, if it is ofopmiun that tlnwfrA ^«'/«v//,/,c,.hiul ju.st reasun to learlrouhle, would declare the a.lnidicalioti nn||, without |iroiioun- um;,'asiolhe validity of the cause ol troiilih. Jooni it ,S/,u/er ic Jiaire, 7 R. L. "O.j, O li O'i. On a petition ni millilii de decrel of a sheritl s .-uh— //,./,/, that, an error in liie minuies ol ,-eizure as to the cunlents of an im- liioveahle liearin^' a caduslral niinilier will not alone Mippurl a deman.l liv the purchaser to have the .-ale vacated, on the frroiind of mis- description, even where a lot only thirty leet Iruntu^e was desurihed as of f.irlv-live feel Ironta-e ; hut, wiiere a lot of land .sold"at sherilfs sale Has de.scrihed in the minutes of sfi/iire and 111 the udvertisements as liaviiij; a two- story Wooden hou.se thereon erected, while in fact the liou.se in .jiiestioii was erected partly on tiie lot Hold and partly on the adjoiniiij,' lot, and It was prove.l, moreover, that the purchaser would not have bouj,'ht if lie liad hoen aware of the error, the wale would he vacated at the suit of tlie pill chaser on the i;round of iiiisdesunption. La Vic. lie I'rcl A Cndit Fonder <& lia/ccr, 24 L._C.,J. 1.5, Q. 15. 1871). ut. iiut where tlie purchaser and adjudica- tuiri: wa.s the original vendor no co.-l-s were allowed, lb. i>5. Petition to annul a siieriir's sale. Peti- tioner was delendant, ami alleged in support of her petition that hy the jiidgnienl in tliecaii.su she liait lieen condemned to give up another lot vviihin 15 days alter service of the jiidgnieiil upon her, and in detault to jiay $1J0 interest ami Costs; that she gave up the laml within 15 duvs yet, notwithstanding, a writ ol e.vecutioii i.ssin'il, uimer winch other land No. 208 was seized and sold ; that the sale of No. 2(W was further illegal, hecaii.se petitioner never hail jiossessiun 01 It, and a [letition to annul the sale liad been tiled hyanollier, which petition was still pend- '\\\g—lldd, that as the lornialities of the sale had not been complained of, and no opposition to the sale was made betore iilteen davs pre- viou.s to the sale, that iiuliitie.s or inlbriiialities arising out of the delaitssemeiU could not be invoked under 714 V. C. P. R„hnt v. K„rth- ri.nt having made a inisiaWe and only aliendiiiTr m 11 a.m. — //(■/,/, iiisiiHicient to set aside "the s^ile. Coiiiiwrcial .Miihud Jliiildinn Soi-idi/ v .Uijnr, ;i L. N. ,157, .S. V. 1880. "^ ' 57. And /iffld, also, that the costs on such petiti.m were the same as those allowed in ordinary suits. Ih. M. Of Tcw/.v.— The sale of a meivliani vessel hy a creditor iiiuy be opposed bv any IirevioiiM registereil neirt-agee, imle-s ihe' leave ol the court lias been oblaineil. h'<,.i.s v. Smith dc Cinliii, 2 L. N. 3U2, & 23 L. C. J. :m, S. C. 1 87 J. fly. Place oj.— A sale hy the sherilfof .Mont- real at his own olhce of land siiinite m the parish of ri-hifaiil Jrsin^, a duly ererteil parish lor all civil purposes lormed out of the parish ol Montreal, was voi.l, and siicl- sale could he legally ellecti'd only at the church door of the |i;insh of rhhilaiil Je.m.s.' F,m/.:,u v. l.mii .I' Mor .ja.jK Co., 22 L. C. .F. 282, Ar 2 l>. N. 15, Q. 1 ls7,^ ,v 2 L. N. 424, i, ;i S. C. Hep. 411 tiO. And //e/r/, also, that such niillilv conld be invoked by means of a petition tiled a"lter'lie sale and served on all the interested (lariies^ or by means of an upposition tiled alter the sale and contaiiiini;all the es-eniial allegations of a petition en niilli/c dedem-l. lb. (il. /V.v.v(,'.w/oy(.— The (idiiiilicutaire of an im- moveable sold by licilution who takes posses- sion ol the immoveable cannot be sued en com- pluiiUe by the posse.s.sor of the juoperty, espe- cially If he has been a party to the action. Hii.s V. Joseph, 7 U. L. 90, S. U. 1875, & 9 li. L. oG, Q. H. I87ti. 02. Defendant was the adjitdica/aire of a piece ol land, being part of a liirm protierty owned an.l held by plaintilf, but which had been sold by judicial licitation, plaintilf beiii" a Jiarty in the cause in which it was sold. De- lendant after the sale went and took pos.session, and plaintilf look action po.ssessory to eviol him— yA/(/, reversing ihe judgment of the court below, that delendant had no right to take possession wilhout an order of the court, even though the plaintilf was in the original action. llun & Joscp/t, 9 U. L. 50, Q. B. 1870 * Siieli sales were legalizod and conflrinod by 42-13 681 S\LR. V liobnl V. Nnrth- l.'t.l. S. C. 18M0. u xiilc iiiiiili' liv the on wliicli 111,.' |H.,i. ,0(10. Tlic |)ri)|iiTlv I'liriildire lur *J,20'o tfi'. Tlicgrdiiii.lM „(■ iirelmse waw iniiidu- ; wiii* tlic j-oii <,r 111,. "in, lliui III- hiiil no iMil (icrciiiluiit iiseil rniiii iiltfiiiliri;,' mill •r wiiiiM liuvf U'lMi j.'a<,'f ir tlic |ir((|iiTtv no. Till' fvi.|ein''t. WUH wiirlli ovi'f :00. Tlml Uic.-.iil,. IIk' |i('tilii)iii'i- ^va^^ 1101' iif llK'ir iij,'fiit I only auciiiliiigm t 1() >ct u-.h|p tlie 'hiildilltl >.,, j^ly y ;s(». the (iOStS nil HlICll lliusi! iilluweil ill le of li iiici'cliiiiit JO uppuHi'd liy liny 'f, iiiilc-s ilif leave CI I. Ii'ii.1.1 V. Siitit/t L. C. J. :{1JU, S. C. ic slicriil'uf .Miiiit- mill siiiiiite iM the inly eri'i'leil imrish (lilt (if the iiiii'i.MJi or iled after the mile al alle";ations of a lb. liimlaire of an ini- vliu taken posses- it be sued cit ami- le jiroperty, espe- y to tlie aoiioii. J. 1S75, & 9 R. L. ijmlicalaii-c of a a laini pr(i|ierty , but which had , plaiiitiU'bein^' a : was sold. Ue- 1 tool< possession, isessory to eviot iilgiiieni; of the j no riyht 10 take t' llie court, even e orijiinal action. i. 1870. confirmed by 42-13 m iu litigatiou are SALE. C83 6.1. An adjudicataire nmy obtain a writ of posHcHsion lifter the expiration of u year and a (lay Iron, the date of the adjndicution, provided lie move tor the same within the year and a (lay IroMi llie judKrnenl ,,t distribution. Snvdl r. .;"".,* '^""t/l"'", i y. I- It. IM, S. C. It. iV 2 !.. N. 202 il JJ. 1M7H. W. Hill tlie rtr.ileC„n.Metropolitaine, 2 L.N. 131, Jt 211 L. C. J.221,S. C.K. 1879. XVI. Ok rMMOVEABLK.s. £j}e<-' 1/ J^ea.ie Pending, see LEASE. XVIII. Or Lam.. *J,"Vn^'''',''''''''''''^*''"''''''"-f''«i'''''T';lni"K'(l ♦ l.ii.tiU, lialaiKjedue on a sale of hind to delind- aiit.ol which land defendant iiiid taken pus-es- .-lon. Ill the deed uf sale the prupertv .sold was describe.' .,. no acres in s,iperlicie.«, liirinine parte the I f i. lot in the 12th range u, the lowP i.ip of S.;i .ford, and setting uiu the boui la-e- of >'>\ ; 100 acres. Plea, ihal the sale vas . nh guu,.,nteeof law and fact uf the hind . <(,. .cribed ,' id situated as described. Hy a subs. i.^Mi s.; vey, however, it was estab- lished II.,, il.,. property described luiriied part olaiiothei lot and reallv belon-fcl fu the Crown and Ihal assoun as theplaintiil lisijuvired that' he t.^Kik steps to obtain the letters patent IVuni the (rovernment in his own name. Deli.ndant himseli, however, purcha.sed the properly f um the (lovernment and tiled his certiticate. Tliis was the lilt of which defendant was in posses- sion. Ihe lot No. l-t described in thed'ed be- longed to a third partv, and was nut of imo,] (luality. Deleiidant prayed that the deed to hiiii lieaniiulleil, and plaintill' be condemned to reimburse him the money which lie had paid on account of it. Plaintitl' answered thai he really was m posse.ssi(in of a lot such as des- cribediiithe deed ; that he had iiimself uecii- pied and cleared il, and made improvements upon It; that he had rented it to the delendant, who had occupied it, and that he. the delendant. knew the property well, and had declared himseir thoruiighly satislied with it. The detendant also knew that there was a nominal error in the de-cription of the lot, and that it ^^.,.s to defraud plaiiitirt'that he had obtained a ticket irom .overnnient. Action maintained in Superior Court, bill in review and app^-al dism ssed. Ro;/ V. l)i,.n, 8 R. L. 2.VJ, (J. \i. l,s,(i. 71. Wliile Action t'endin(/.—The oppo-aiits became proprietors of the undivided half of au inimoveable by deed of sale from the derendant II \^U. In October, lf<7'), tliev aeipiired the ivinaining half by deed from thedeleiidaiit. Be- fore tlie latter deed was signed the notary, at the request of one of the oppo-anls, went to the registry office and made search to ascertain if there were any encumbrances registered a.'aiiist the properly, and having reported tliai'there were none the deci was execut<;d. Sometime afterwards the j.roperly in ipiestion was seized under the plaintitfsexecntioN.andtheopposaiits then became aware tbr the lirst time That in July, 1870, the plaintiff had brought an action against the defendant for a balance due to hi n under a former deed of .sale to the auteur of Mia dotcmiaiit, and that ihe plaintitt' had obluiiied judgnient in that action in October, 1S7J two (iays belore the second deed of sale from the delendant to the oppoeants was passed. The J-i ■13 m >\\ I 6S3 SALE. i I plaintiff hail no regiftcfcil rights against the iiroperty at tiie tinie of Ilic si'Odiid 'leeii of sale. His claim was I'oiiniled upon a ileeii execntei) liefcji'e tlie caihi-^trai system uaine into force, ami no renewal (if tlie registration had at this time taken plaw — //<■/./, that, notwitlistunding his Judgment, the plaiiitill liad notille whicli conid jn-evaii airain^t I he opposants. T/iiii/rr & Aiiscll k M'liss, 2 L. N. 7.-), S. C. & 3 L. 'N. 2 42, & 24 L. C. J. 181, S. C.K. 1H79. XIX. Ok Movkaui.ks.' 72. Herniation o/'.— The respondent seized in the po>sessi(in of appellant, liy attachment in revendicatioii,a (piaiitity of wood which he hail previously sold him, an'd which he had liiiled to pay for. With tlin attachment a demand was made fur the resiliation of the sale, :ind that in case I he attachment would not hold as an attachment in revendicatiun that it serve as a sainic ciiii.scrnitDirc—Jhlii, that under article 104;-! of the Civil Code the unpaid vendor liad a right to aresiliation, even afu-r the eight days inen;iipned in article 11)'.)!), and that the attach- ment was gooil as a cimservalory process. JIfiidersoii & Tremblay, 21 L. C. J. 24, Q. B. XXI. Pay.me.n't of Pl'iich.vsl: .Monkv. 7.3. Ileal estate ofa snhstitution was sold, and the jiurehase money was ullnwed to remain in the hands of .\[., "the purchaser, until another investment should he found. .Suli-eipiently a nii'de of investing the jiurchase mnucy was duly auth.iri/ed by a tiimily council— //e/(/, that M. could not refu>e to pay over the |)nr- chase money oi. the ground (hat the proposed investment was not in strict accordani'e with the li'rms of the deed creating the siili.^titiilion. .)//////,( it Mirhoii, I L. N. til).'!, Q. J!. 1S78. * OK MdVKAIiLE.S OP SUCCKSSIOX. ACT TO OKCLAUK VA LI t) CKItTAIN S A t.liS or MOVE- AHLus iiiiLoMUNo TO seeei-:ssiuNs. ■WliiTra* ill virtiiiMifarliclcs I.Slin anil ,'J72 of tlie Code of Civil I'r.ic.'iliiiv till' Mill' of iiiiivi'Mlili's lH'liiii(!iim til a suoi-i's hiiiiiliy wlieii such Kill,, iviis hii- liouiiei-(l by puliHc notice, tloit ta to say tlifSi'Coml Tui'Silay allcr tho Sunday aloroMiiil; wheri'iis siiici' tlio imitiiu' into force of ilii> (; ill' ^rvi'ial of tlinso sales have been made on tbe seooml .■Moodiiv instead of tlic seeonil lues, day after the Sunday af iresaid, iis was the custom jire- villus to the Co.le; and whereas this irre);iibiritv ma\ be pr.jiidici.il to the inteie-ts ofalaiKe nn iiber id' Ihmilies, and that in conse.|nence it is uivm that these sah's .'hoiild b' iniiile valid ; llierelnre Her Jlaje.sty, by ami wi,h I lie Uilviee and consent ol the l.e^ishituru of Unehec, enacts »< lo lows; 1 Kv'Ty sale of moveables belonging to iccessions of wliich one of the co-heirs w is a minor ii...de since tiie coming iiilo (iiieo of the Code of ( ivi| I'roceilnre until the coming into force of this Act the spcmid .Monday in- stead of tlie second Tneiiday lollowing tbe lir-t Sunday on wbich such sale ought to have been ■'euounceil, ac- cu-iliiig to articles i;ai anil r,72 of the Ci. . if Civil I'ro- ceiluie isdechir. d valid, and shall be bo considered in law; proviileil always that all the otber formalities re- quired by law shall liavebeen obsei-veil, '1. ThiH Act shall not allect peiiiling cases. .3. The jjiesent. Vet shall come Into force on the dai of its sanction, y. 4i Vic. cap. 9. AcTiii;Bi-K( riN(;THKsAi.KOFSF,(;tTRiriKBBi:LoNni\u Tl) eKUSOSH NOT IN nil: KXKUCISKUlf TIlKIli Civil, Kii.UTB. Hei- y. Vi-ii Vic. call. M. SALE. XXII. Privilege of Vendor. 684 74. The 82nd section of the Insolvent Act of 1H75 has not taken away the right of the ven- dor to revendicate goods sold Ijy him to the in- solvent, and the price whereof has not been paid. Iliiiclieile el at. & Gooderham et ah, 21 L. C. J 105, S. C. 1S77. XXIII. PitoHiniTioNTO Alienate Contaixed In. Action in resiliation ofa deed of sale from |.)laiiitilf to the father of deleiidaiit under the lollowing circumstances : Defendant was the Soli of the vendee liy his first wile. The vendee having taken a daughter of plaintilf, the vendor, as his second wife, iilaintifl' sold him the lot of land in question tor S200, agreeing to allow $100 to remain in the hands of the vendee in anticipation of his daughter's rights in his suc- cession, while the vendee on his jiart fiound him- self to leave ihe proiierty to his ehildreii liy the second iiiarriage. riieVe were five chilllren, issue of the second marriage, who survived their parents, hut the vendee, in.-tead of leaving the property in riuestion to them, lelt it to defend- ant, one of his children by his first marriage, whom he constituted his" universal legatee. Flaintill'asked foi the resiliation ol the sale on this ground, and on otieriiig back the $100 re- ceived as pan of the purchase money. Deleiid- aiit did not contest, lint erne of hi.'J creditors intervened, and ijleaded that the stipulation was illegal and null, inasmuch as it constituted a prohibition to alienate a jiroperty sold by oner- ous title — llel'l, maintaining the intervention on this ground, and dismissing the plaintilfs action with costs. Sahtis v. Neoeu & Druid, 10 R. L. 72, S. C. 1871). XXIV. Promi.se of. 7(i. On the 28lh.luly, 1874, the appellant gave to the resnoinleiit a writing, entitled " sale from Daniel Aliinro to Mr. .M. Diifresne."' It was in effect a promise of sale, by whicii M, hound himself to sell to 1). certain immovealile I)roperly, therein designated, for the price of .'!:.')t),(100, of which , in the township of Shelford. in thedistrict of IJedlord. Deleiidaiit had been in pnssession five years and claimed under an allei.'eil promise of sale from plaintilf, through his agent. The plea alleged that one Wood was, in the month of ,lunc, isiili, and liir a long time previous, the amliorized and recognized agent of the plainlill' at Shelt'onl. and that he did in llie name and at the insiance ol' the |j|ainlill sell his lands there and in the adjoining lownsjnps and receive and collect the moneys of siudi pur- chases. That about the Sth June, ISdS, the said Wood, acting as such agent with ihe know- ledge and consent of the phiiiitiir, bargained and sold to the delendant the saul noitli ipiiirter of the said lot Xo. 17, in the tilth range of lots in the said township of Shetl'ord. fir the price of ten dollars per acre, and then and there received from di'i'iiiil.inl lor piainlil) the sum ol §12.^. That plaintiil', acting as aforesaid, then and there undertook to grant defendant a promise of Bale of the said jjarcel of land for the price mentioned, the balance of the purchase moiiev to be paid in three annual instalments with interest, and that plaintiil', iiy his agent, theie- iipon gave del"iiilaiil permission to occupy the same as if the promise of sale had been executed ; that derendant accordingly tonk imssessinn of the land, and had ever since remained in the occiiiiation thereof, and had paid mil large sums in iiiiprovements ; that plainlill' had iiviled to fullil his part of the allegrd agreement, and di- feiidant by reason of the pri'iuises claimed a right to the land in question. Plaintilf denied all these averments, and the i]iiestion that arose was as to the ageiu'y of the persmi Wood. .V large ainoiint ol' evidence was produced by de- fendant, including that of Wood '!:niseli;'wlio had since left Canada and was re •■ ling in the States. Hilt /lelil, that the promi-e of sale was nut snUii'ieiitlv proved, and )ud^ment firplaiii- tiin Sliiai-t & \y/iife, 7 K. L. 52:i. Q. B. Is",;. 7!). \ condition in a promise of sale that, althonj;li followed by possession ii should not be eipiivalent to a sale— /A/«?, valid. Xiic/ y. fj'irrrilicri' it liritixh Aiin'riri Land Co., 4 Q. 1.. R. 217, S. C. R. 1878. XX.K PritciiA Kit CAXN-(vr Dkmaxd Covi'ik- TKINnK. WIIl:UK XO Tl.lt.M tS OlVKX FOR PaY.MKXT, WITIIOI'T Oh'l'KlilXIJ TIFK PlUCK. SO. The ;!lst Novenilier, 1871',, the respondent sold to appellant two cars of oats (about 1100 bushelsj, at the rate of one cent per pound, de- liverableat iliecai-sat St. Paschal, the appeU lant iindertalving to pay also one cent lor com- mission, the whole pavalile at the time of delivery. The 27th of November following the respondent sold to appellant two other ears of oats (about 1-11)0 biishi-ls of.'ili pounds), deliver- alile at the Taclie mill and at the cars, the appi'llant binding himself to pay besides !?Ul of eommission, the whole payable at delivery. The respondent sold two cars of oats and wa-' paid liir them. .\l'lerwarils he sent to the Taclni mill another lot lormiiig the balance soM, and applied toappellanl fn' payment; appellant not being r"ady to pay re-pondi'iit earne I his oats away again. Appellant then without any otl'er of payment or any demand upon him for the oats sued out a writ of revendication in order to seize them, but the oats having liMcn carried olf and relnriied lo where thev ciiiie from he was unable to doso. However he pro- ceeded with his action, and obtained jiiiigment ordering appellant lo deliver the oats or pav damages. I'liis judgment was reversed i'ti review, aiul in appeal the jildgmeiil in revi.'w was conlirmed, on ihe ground that appellant could not demand deliverv of the oats with mt olli'ring 'he nemev. lilinjibin ifc Ldid, 5 Q. L. R. S7, (,>. I!. 1878. XXVI. PiiiciH ;::s Pi(i-;srMED to he maiiis WITH M0Xl:V OK I'i'llCUASliK. 81. Where a trader before insolvency went to England, taking with him a sum of lim own miiiiey and a sum belonging lo his wili', and purchased giiods lliere m coniieclioii with his trade — Ihhl. that in the absence of any account of the money so taken from his assets It must be assumed that the purchase of goods wae :ii 5 1 :- la 687 SALE. SALE. 688 I 1^ iiiaile with such fiiiidn. Sterens & rerkiiin, 1 L. N. 290, Q. U. 1878. XXVII. Rkoiktratiox of Titi.k. 82. Tlie plniiitirt' boiifiht an iininovpahlc on the 28th Novetiilior, 187(), uiid ref^lstered liis title on the 5th December followini;. In tlie interval, on the lidtli November, the ilelenchint having obtained jiKljrnient against llie venilur, regifitered it agauisl the immoveable in (jiies- tion as being still in possession of the vendor, the puroiiaser not having registered his title — JJehl, rever.-ing the judgment of the court below, that a sale of an immoveable witlumt registration has no eti'ect with retjard to third parties, and tlie hvpotliec must be maintained. Lef'ebvre v. Brdiirliiiinl, 1 L. N. 2:50, -bii)meiit. Tlial upon tiie faith of the invoice they had both accepted the bill, and liad sold the iron before its arrival to the Massoii Manu- tacttuiiii; Company at Oshawa, who, immediate- ly on getting it, discovered that the whole of the 4,2(iit bars were worthless and unmercliant- ab e; and the deliendants, on being made aware of it, gave notice to the vendors through their agent iiere, wlio directed that samples might be sent down Icjr inspection, which was done, and the defendants alsolhemselvesgot down a num- ber of bars to be tested, and it was all inspected and tested in the agent's [iresence, liy competeiil and skilled persons, and it was fijund that ..iii ol ten, only six bars were iiiercliantHble ; il thereupon the defendants notified the sellers that they would not accept it, but would only hold it oil their account. The evidence of plaintiffs sets up that the deleiidanls have waived the right of pleading all this by taking and accepting the tiling solil and treating it as their own, ami dis- jiosiiig ol it tiy sale to another. Tlie evidence shows that the contruet was for " Coates '' iron of ditleieiii diinensions ; that the particular lot in question was not merciiantable j that the bill was accepted before the i''on arrived, and it was sold before arrival aiid taken from the ship to tlie canal or railway without being seen by the buyei.-i ; that it was objected to and refu,«ed by the Massoii Manulacturing Co., who had bought II from the defendants, and that an inspection was had of samples which showed according to the great weight of evidence, that it WHR not at all the thing that it liad been con- tracted to sell. IJy the court— It was conteinled that this was one of those cases where the pur- chase of the whole 141 tons must be repudiated to entille the defendants to reiress. The con- trary of that proposition was clearly laid uown in Leduc v. Shaw by the Court of Appeals, even in the case of the sale of one lot of tlour, a portion of which had turned out bad, but all the authorities are clear where the thing sold is in separate lots as to size and price, which was the case here, the right to repudiate for one part only is certain. This is repeated without varia- tion in all the series of books usually referreil to. Touliier, No. 57 8; Duranton, who puts the case of a tlock of sheep where one or more shoulii turn out bad, and all the rest. It was contended also that tlie acceptance of tiii iron and the sale to others was conclusive against the delendants' right ; and the well-knowi; case of Morton v. Tibbets as to wjiat constitutes an acceptance to satisfy the st^itut^- ■•> frauds was cited, but there is a well-known and perfectly familiar distinction between such an accept nee and one that would be evidence of the fulfil- ment of all the conditions of an obligation. In inat very case ot Morton v. Tibbets, Lord Campbell used the well-known and oft-repeated words: "The acceplaiice to let in parole evidence of the contract appears to us to be a different acceptance from that which atlords conclusive evidence of the contract having been fulHIIed." Therefore I think that the defen- dants did all they were bound to do ; that the thing sold, as regarils the part in question, was not fit for the purposes tor which it was bought j and that the purchaser has the right under the law to return it and keep that part of the price. Maxwell & Cooper, 8, C. 1877. 84. The ca.i^e arose out of the sale of 500,000 feet of siilings to appellant. The action was lor the balance of price, and the '■ frauds was iwn and perfectly jcli an accept ne'e Jnce of the fulfil- an ohiigatioii. In V. Tibbeis, Lord n and oft-repeated to let in parole mrs to us to be a ut which attords tract havitig been V that the deleii- d to do ; that the t in tjiiestioii, was cli it was bought ; e right under the part of the prict. r, le sale of 500,000 'he action was lor pu'Htion was as to lit down in barges of the tirst ship- 'd 10 some e.^teiit f the quality he isre should be a he gave hit notes, ctioii to i\ .'inure ellant nnideiilijec- 1 upon, i;i conse- ir quality ot the ed the action, but plaiiititi's' preten- 'iit must be coll- ed that there was lion tliat the ap- his liability. He I tills en demeiire iii-tead of that he id the luiiiber got t wished to make would lie iiiipos- pnent confirmed. ?old to insolvent: »iii property with non payment of ts and privilegeii 689 SALE. SALE. 690 under such deed to ths Trust & Loan Omn- pany with due notice. The debtor Inning jailed, and the price not haviii;; been paid, the petitioner demanded the resolution of the sale, and the possession of tlie projier'y out of the hands of the assignee. 'I'lie assignee pleaded the transfer to the Trust and Loan Coii'pany, and also that petitioner hul tiled his claim in the hands of tiie a-^signeo, and had taken part and acquiesced in the prooet'dings of the credi- tors, and thereby (orl'eited his riglit to act under the stipulation of the deed — Held, that the transfer to the Trust & liOan Company was but a pledge, ami irkl not prevent the pledgor from exercising the rights and privileges pledged with the Consent (if the pledgee. Fanner & Bell & The Trust & Loan Co., 6 Q. L. U. 1, S. C. R. 1879. 86. Where a property had been sold prior to the C«le — lichl, that ihebaillenr conlil exercise a right of resolution, even thoiigli not stipuiatcd, and without renewal of registration. La Cie. de Pref., etc., v. Garand & Heueij, .'! L. N. 370, S.C. 1880. 87. Action in resiliation of certain lots of land wliich plaintitf had purchase i from defen hint at p'lhlic auction. At the sale it was annonneeil thai the ilefendant's title to the property was perlect and imlispulable, that the propertv was free and clear of all seigniorial claims and dues, and no mention was made of any charge or hypothec of any kind. Some time after the sale plaintiff', wdio had purchased some of tlie iOts, discovered that there was a mortgage of $200,000 on the whole property, and that he could not give a clear title to the lots he wished to resell. He asked therefore thnt the sale be cancelled, and that he get back what he had paid on account of the price, and what lie hivl paid for improvements, etc. — Held, maintaining tlie action. Brete.iter v. Grand Trunk Railwaij Co. of Canada, 3 L. N. 410, S. C. 1880. XXXL Rights of Vesdok. 88. Respondent, by his action, claimed from appellant S750. He alleged that one L , now in- solvent, and whom be rei3resenl"d on the 1st May. 1807, purcha.sed from appellant the scow (C/ialand) venant (iir $1,105 ; that the purchaser took possession of the scow and used it for three seasons ; that in Uecemlier, IHOO, he tailed, and during the winter of 1870, appellant ille- gally re-took possession of the scow and useil it for two years; that the value of tlie use ol it was $800" per year ; that at the time of tlie in- solvency there remained due of the purchase money to the appellant §730 ; that the scow was then worth $1,000; the amount claimeii by tlie action was the lialance left from tlie value of the scow and its use during two years alter deduction of what was due to ap|iellant. Ap- pellant pleaded that he had never sold the scow to L., that there was only a promise of sale of it, that the title to it haii always remained in Ills possession, and lie had retaken the scow with the consent of the piircbaser's assignee— Held, that nolwithstainling no title had passeii, that tlie defendant having delivered the scow and received payments on account could not retake possession of the vessel, and must pay the value of it after deduction of what wi. - still due to him Beaupri Sr Labelle, 7 R. L. 580. Q. B. 187(). XXXn. Simulated. 89. One N., bei.ig indebted to .appellant in the sum of.?i,'iOO,olfered as security a mortgage on three pieces of land, and a deed was accord- ingly executed, but ii being afterwanis founil that N. could not legally hypothecaie one of the three lots a deed of sale was pi.ssed by which heconveyei! t(> appellant tlie said lot for the e.xpressed price of $400, with the verbal understanding that as •^oon as the amount due was paid to appellant he would reconvey to N. the lot in --lion. Aboiu two months after N'. became in ilvent, and tied the country. The two lots mortgaged being brought to sale real- i/,ed Some $9t)0 lijr aiij'ellant, wiio then claimed the riglit to retain the third lot lor the balance due liim, whereupon respcjndent, a judgment creditor, wdiile admitt'-ig the validity of the mortgages, attacked the deod of sale as simula- ted and friu'.iiulenf, and contested appellant'.^ right to prevent a judicial sale of tiie said piece of land. — llidd, that tiie dcu of sule was si m iilated and void (or total want of consideration, and the property never having (lasscd under it the land could be brought to sale as still tiirm- ing part of N'.'s estate. I'acaud & llnsUm, 3 Q. L. R. 214, Q. H. 1877. DO. A tiiiii of brewers scM to respondent, a notary, all the inachiiierv, etc., in the brewery for one dollar in hand, and other good considera- tion, part of which was that respondent should endorse notes for the vendors from time to time as rc.iuired to the extent of ."S'iOOO. There wa.i no delivery ol tlie etl'ects sold, but respondent leased them back to the vendors forthree years at tlie rate of §100 per year. — Held, ihat the sale was simulated, and was in reaiuy a pledging of the moveables claimed to have been sold riUher than a sale. Duiniy & Cushinq, 22 L. C.,I. 201, Q. H. 1878, &3 L. N. 171', & 24 L. C. J. 151, P. C. 1880. XXXni. Stoppa'^e in Trax.situ. 91, The petitiont . , a merchant, of Leeds, Eng- land, sought by revendication to recover pos.^e.s- sion of goods sold and sent to .Montreal, wdiere they had been deposited mid were still lying in the Custom House, on tbo ground that the buyer had in the meantime become insolvent. The n-signee opposed the revendication under sec. 82 of (lie insolvent Act, — Held, mainlainiiig the petition, that tliey bad not been delivered in terms of art. 1513 of ti.j Civil Code, Thomson & Greenwood, 9 R. L. 379, S. C. 1877. XXXIV. To Avoid Sequestb.vtion. 92. Plaintitl' brought an action against the defendant, fouinled upon an iillegeil sale to him by the former, through the ageiicv of T., on the .'!Oth of May, 1875, and asked fbi' a title. The action was served on the 24th of June last; and on the 30tli of this month the plaintitl" presented a petition lor sequestration, tounded on the tact of the pendency of the action, and also ufion one other allegation only, viz., that the delen- ;:|i ■v-* 1 m I i i I 691 SALE. SALE. 692 • laiit retains posspssion i' the pro|)ortv illegally. ThiH petition was anMvert'.l by llie 'ileleu'lai'it liy an alle'ration tliat he hail siilil t, lie property to D., on tiie 21st .Iiiiie, hv deeii lielore iiotar'v on that (lay, and reiristereil'on tl;e 2:iril of .June. The piaintilt replied that this sale to I), was siinnlated and fraudnlent. T., the a>jent who sold to the p'aintiti; swore that he met 1). on two ooeasions— hrst, ahout the 5tli or Gih of June, and subsequently on the lOtli. On tiie first occasion T. told liini he hail moM this pro- jierty to plainlill'.and the only remark D. made was that it was a considerable piece of land. On the second occasion, D. tnM T. that he had purchased the property. T., asked him how that could he, seeintr what he liad told Inrn a few days helbre. The answer was that even at that time the sale had heen completed.— H'hl, that the sale was simiilaicd, ainl seipies- tration ordered. Farmer & 0'N<:n, S. C. 187G. XXXV. To Two Pi;iisoN-s. 0.3, Where a pf.rty has obl;■'■ detjtor only, and is not oilii,'6 for the payment of the debt transferred, and the cessionaire therelbre can e.xerci-'e his re- course en garantie only after discussing the property of tiie debtor and establishing his insolvency. Homier & Brosscau, 1 L. N. 02, S. C. 1877. i*8. Wiiere action was brouglit on a bon given as boot in an exchange of iiorses, and defendant plead;d a redhibitory vice in the horse lie re- ceiveif—Hetd, that his rigiit waived by tlie delay which was from 2.Sfd June to 20tli"Sept. Ver'uteau v. Foupart, 21 L. C. J. 320, S. C. 1877. 99. An action brought iiy the purchaser of a iior.se for vice red/iittitoire seventeen days after lie liad taken tlie liorse home, was Jield too late. Donilieek Murphy, 2 L. N. 94, Q. B. 1879. 100. The defendant by deed of transfer of .31st May, 1875, transferred to plaintiffs a /jc/r de rente witii guarantee. Tlie defendant on be- ing sued olijected that tlie plaintitf iiad not used diligence in discussing the principal debtor. As a matter of fact the plaintiff was not hound to discuss t e principal debtor, being exempt by tiie deed, 1 had done so— Held, tiiat in such case he c lu only be iield liable for gross negligence, i'^ tc.on maintained. Montreal Loan y one L. P., liv il, and ri'tristci'cil ll'. in conseiiiiciico, It iIk' (leeil uf'salf less tlieik'ti'iiiliint aiiotlier iiiciilion- (lis(liurf;('(l. The '/iinintie, iitul thry ' arricre (/artailii'. c was HiiiMiloil on ■ con I re taiitct cs- qui ixmrroat Ivnr iiirci; lint iliil not nil/e.—llelil, tliat could MOtdeiniind ultut'llierfiiioval erwards appeared )ertv. Talbot v. . R." 1870. '. with promise to doir is .suretv lor , and in not ohlii/i transferred, and exerc.i-^e his re- r (iiscussing the establisiiinj; his !cau, 1 L. N. 02, lit on a boil given ?», and defendant the horse he re- waived by the me to 20th Sept. Z. J. 32G, S. C. e purchaser of a teen days after he as held too late. , Q. B. 1879. 1 of transfer oi' plaintills a 2)iix (Ii'tendant on he- laintift had not principal debtor. f was not bound l)eing exempt by Id, that in such ial)le for gross Montreal Loan N. 284, S. C. returned a co?)- iin the plaintiffs pie, except one iirity tor freight that under the t to return the d one piece in for money dis- • right to do so. Q. li. 1879. lant exchanged 52 swap money. •. On the 13t"li id him unsound • hi c/ieval avail rdingly prayed ^d to take back 3 «;i0.52. The /"e in the horse he horse was souffle, and de- fendant furflier «aid that plaintifT ha(l never tendered the horse hack — Held, that as tiie vice complained of was not adejaut cac/ii, and as no express warranty was proved, that tlie action would be dismissed. Crevier v. Ohayer, .S L. N. 84, S. C. 1880. XXXVIII. What is, .nv. PLEDGE. 10.3. In a seizure of ceviain horses, harness, etc., an intervention was lileii, Ijased on a deed the material portion of which was as fullows : " El jiiiur Kiirele (hi reiiibour.scinent et paiemeiif "d'icdle .soinnie le dit D.C. dihiteur d traiis- " porli et iiiin en mains da dit C. G. les chccaiix " et harnaifi et ce dernier ponrra en Jouir u sa " disposition niaumoins en conrir anenns ri.s- " (lui'sJn'iijH'aii paiemeiif par le dit comparant " de la nomine sitscitA temps anquel le dit C. G. " reinetlra les dits oljjels en mains dii dltdebiteiir " n'a pas effectua le remboitrscmeiit de la dite " soinine le dit C. G. (/ardera pardevers lui les " dits objets el en sera et restera proprietaire." The debt «as not paid before 1st August, but at the time of the seizure (Augu it 31) tlie inter- venants were not in possession of the horses — Held, confirming judgment of court below,* that the agreement was simply a pledging of tlie horses ami not a sale. C'ot^.. v. Currie, 2 L. N. 348, Q. B. 1879. 104. Where a firm of grain brokers borrowed 25,000 bushels of corn to be returned in kind, and dejwsited a sum of money as security — Held, that the return of tlie corn, according to this arrangement, did not constitute a sale so as to give them a privilege for a balance of the money unpaid. Borrownian & Aiii/us, 2 L. N. 92,24 L. C. J.1,Q.B. 1879. SALES. I. C0.MMISS10N ON, .see AGENCY, Brokers. SALVAGE. I. Lien for, sec MERCHANT SHIPPING. II. Rkmuneration for, see BOTTOMRY AND RESPONDENTIA. SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS— /Sfee COMMON SCHOOLS. I. Liability or, oa CoNTBACTa with Teachers. 105. Tlie defendants, as scliool commissioners, engaged a school teacher for a certain section under their control, ant! afterwards, without ap- parent cause, engaged another in her place to whom they paid the salary. Action uy their successors in otHce to recover the amount of salary so paid — Held, that pleas of want of • 22 L. C. J. 34. notice and of prescription would not hold, but as the action was stated to have been liy reason of the money having been illegally paiil to the other, and without cause, whereas the payment was perfectly legal, and damages only should have been demanded, the action would be dis- missed without costs. Scliool Coiiiinissioncrs of St. Marlhe v. St. Pierre, 2 L. N. 343, S. C. 1879. SCHOOL TAXES. I. Action for. II. I).ima(;es for Illegal Seizire for, see DAMAGES. HI. Prescription of, see PRESCRIPTION. I. Action for. 10(). .School taxes cannot be sued for in the Sujicrinr Court. Corporation of Tmcnship of Acton k Felton, 24 L. C. J. 113,'S. C. R. 1879! SEALS. I. Power of Provinces to Appoint ani> Alter.* II. Re.moval of. t •I'owER OF Provinces to Appoint and Alter. Whereas doubts liav arisen «s to the power of ap- pointing and altpiino; the ((roat Seals of the I'roTiiices, other tliaii Ontario and Quebeu, and ai'O a.s to the vali- dity of inntrumentaseHleii with the soul liprotofori' nsod as the Great Seal of the Provmre of Nova Scolia, and whereas it is ri^ht that .ill the ProviuCfS should bo on the same footing with respect to their (ireat Spals, and whereas the Legislature of the Province of Nova Scotia lias passed an Act enipowuring the Lieutenant Governor in Council to alter the Great Seal, and also an Act vali- dating all instruments sealed witli the seal herotufore used as the (ireat Si>al, and whereas tlie Lcgi.-lative Council and Assembly ol Nova Scotia have passed ad- dresses praying for legislation in the Parliament of the United Kingdom to the same intent, and whereas it is expedient, so far as the Parliament of Canada may have power to act In the premises, to remove the said doubts, therefore Iter JIajesty by .and with tlui consent 1 f the Senate and House id' Commons of Canada enacts aii.t declares as follows: — The Lieutenant-Governor of each Province iu Council has tha power of appointing and of altering from time totimetheGivatSeal ol the Province. All instrnnuMils sealed with the seal heretofore used afi the Great Seal of the Province of Nova.Scotiaare hereby declared to have been and to be legal and valid notwith- standing any doubt which may exist as to euch seal being the Great Seal. tRi^MovAL of. ACT RESPErriNo the NOTII'K ation I"I:. ATTENDANCE AT THE REMOVAL OP ^SEa.. VENTOUIEH. ,ND THE AND IN- Her Majesty by and with tlie advice and consent of the Legislature of Quebec enacts as follows : 1. Whenever any of the persons entitled to !)e present at the removal of seals, or to take part in an inventory, reside outside of tlie Province, they need not be sum- moned; but ill such case a judicial procurator is named by Bjinige of tlio Superior Court, on application ol the jierson (lemanding the removal of seals or the making of an Irventory, to ri'iiresent such persons; and such jildicilll priHMirutor must I)i> nrest'iit or luive been liotitied iio be [iresent. 2. Notwithstanding the nomination of a jmlieini pro- curator to represent tlie iiersons mentioned in the pre- ceding eeotion sucb persons or any uf them may also be 4 ■A J "i 695 SEDUCIIOK. SECRET ARY-T .: EASURER. I. Ok Suhooi, C(jmmissi()n-kk.^. Acuouxt of Au.MiNiiitt.vnoN OK, ,str ACUOUNT. SECRETION. r. Ol' KsTATE OK C0-£'AUT1TI0NERS, ,9tV PAR- TITION. il. Outside the Phovince. III. WlUT IS. II. Outside the Province. 107. Socretiiiii coininitteil in Ontario inny proiuui of civpi.-iK in Quehoc, if tiie s..|u. (■!■', but was sulijecl to a substitution in liivoi-i..!' li'- ivit^ Jincl cliildrcn. The money uli.s fu-t c,< positeil in a hank in Iiis own naiiie, hut niU-cjuently tlie woi'iJs " mort):age " in tiiist tor li A.M. were added ; shortly afterwards the inuney was all witlidrawn andex|ieiKled-/A7'/,lin'.in.^titiile ^.■l•retion. Muhon Is. Cm ler, \i L. N. 258, Q. B. IS.-iO. I'J;*. Where a defendant, not being a trader, whos ■ effects were under seizure, made an assignment of tlieiii to an assignee, who sold theni to the father-in-law of the defendant, the whole tran-aetiou being evidently simulated an(! effected fV..- the purpose of defrauding the plaintiffs- //(^,, that this constituted secivtion under art. 782 C. C. P., so as to make the lielen- dint liable to coii!rainti>, par corps. JiKuptes Cirlier Ptrmaneiit liuildiiuj Socictii v. Jim/, ;i L N. 314, C.C. 1380. J J J' ■ SECURITY. I. Foil AppitOPIUATION IN Bt'II.DI.VG SOCIE- TIES, see BUILDING SOCIETIES. IL In- AiH'EAL, see APPEAL. SEDUCTION. I. Action kor. 110. An action in declaration of paternity and present ami take part, or may send a power of .'ittori to tile jiiilieiul pnieurator iir In unv olher p.'r-on alioii' ■ tlipy think tit to do so; and sui'ii appearance or apiu.iiu. ment ot nmiidiitory shall teriiiinaie tiie mandate ot tlie judiL'iul procurator 3. Soclion 4 of tlie Act 39 Vic. cap. 33 Bhall anpiv to prccci'iilnKs uiidi-r tlii^ Ait. " ' 4. Arilclea 1298 and 13i|5 of ihc Code of Civil Prociv dure Hio supplemented In tlie partioularii contained In tliisAct. y. 41 Vic cap. U. SEIGNIORIAL RIGHTS. 696 for maintenanco of tlie child niav he bron.'ht hv the UKlher in herown name. 'Kiugshorol^/k & Pownd, 4 Q. L. U. 1 1 , Q. Ji. 1S7S vr<- SEIGNIORIAL RIGHTS. I. CEX.mTAIRES II. Dki.av TO File Hi-potiiec. III. KitaoRs IN Caua.stke. IV. Lous ET Venti.s V. OiensiTioN TO Piik-i;rve Priviikoe UKR. VI. Pkopertv .\cQi'iRKn iiY Chow.v. Vfl. Kinking of Ci-u.ms von f'B.>s vr Rentes. VIII. Registration ok. IX. Reunion of Lands. I. Censitai;:es. HI. The advantages granteilto censifaires by the Statute 22 Vic. cap. 4S are iiiteii led for tiie Jienetit of the proprietors then exi -ting, and ciuinot be clainieii bv their miteurs ,(/id pre- dfeessors. Mongenaia & Rockon, 7 11. L G74 Q. B.187G. ' II. Delay to File Hv POTHEC. 112. The delay of six months prescribed by sec. 41 of cap, 40 of the Con. Stats, of L.,wer Canada for the production of hvpothe. irv oppositions in cases where the funds lor a seigniorial indemnity arc still in the iiaiids of the Government does not apply to the lei'al representatives of a personal debtor. Hart' & David, 4 Q. L. R. 88, Q. B. 1878. III. Errors in Cadastre. U.S. Plaintiffs alleged that bv error the de- fendant's properly within their seigniory was set down in the cadastre of the seigniory as con- taining JiM'j arpents 8 perches, whereas" il really contained 1,084 arpent.s ,'i5 p>erclies. They claimed §15U.20 for five years' arrears of rent oi; the excess of laud on" which iiothiii" had been paid. Plea that liie plaintiffs couTd nut claim rente for more land than was set down in the cadastre, which eonstiiiited a linal title between the parties— //eW, that under 2;)-30 Vic. cap. 80, .sec. 2, the iilaintitf was entitled to rente tor the whole amount of land, but that he should have had a survey made establishing the extent of the land before bringing the ii^ti.i* and as that was not done the action won' '' i' DeBeUe/huHe V. Pic/id, 2 L.ii. 115, &: J. ;il4, S. C. 1879. 1 14. And held, also, tliat notice of sue' «hould have been given to tli nly evidence of which was ah" 'hich was insullicicnt. lb. vey the irn, IV. Lous ET Ventes. 115. A constituted rent created for the Ivi;; tion oflod-i ei ventes, in virtue of 8 Vic. n. .*? RIGHTS. 696 ilii may be broiij»ht anie. King«boroii;ik \. U. 1H78. •' RIGHTS. iTirEO. :rve PBivn,i:(jE r:^- I nv Tuow.v. inteil to censiiaires 4S are iiiteii led for H then exi-firjn, and r anteurn .imi pre- 'ochon, 7 11. L. 674, OTHEC. )iitlis prescrilnd by on. Stnls. of li. .wer "I of liypotlie. -irv e the funds (or a ill in the Imnds of apply to the lej,'al il dehtor. Hart & 1878. at by error tlie de- _'ir neij!niory was set e seif^niory as con- s, whereas it really :i5 perches. They irs' arroiu's of rent vliich M.ithini; h*! Dlaintitfs could ;iot an was set down in luted a (inal title that under 2!)-80 itiff was entitled to if land, hut that he made establishing winding the aitii.n, I action vvoul *;',d. N. 115, &i' ' )ticp of sue! th ,.>■•■.. a b" ri; s affld for thi' B of 8 Vic. vey . the urn, 697 SEIGNIORIAL RIGHTS. sec. 2:?, is, by the Seigniorial Act of 1854 and its aiiiendinents, placed to the charfre of the pul.Hc treasury, and is nol(iiif.'erdne bv the land whii li it iiffect-i'"ree of the legal possessor of the seigni- ory at the lime of the transfer o( the indetnnity, the (ipiifle.f to a substitution are Iwund in terms of (he saiil Seigniorial Act, by themselves or by their tutors or curators, to file an opposition to the lislribntion of the money arising from the redemption of the .seigniorial rights in the seigniory within the six montlis fujlowing tlie first publication of the notice of the deposit of thecadastre; anil in case of neglect or dei'uult on their part to conform tbemsolves to the provi- sions of the Seigniorial Act in this resjiect the moneys arising from the redemption of the seigniorial rights will cease to be atl'ected tiy or subject in any way to their privilege and rights arising under the substitution, and will become a claim purely personal and independent of the grevi dn .wljstitiition who is in possession of (lie seigniory, and who will from that time be free to legallv sell or transler them. I'anet & Bois- sean & DUmne, 10 R. L. Irt3, Q. B. 1879. 117. The detault to produce within six montlis from the dejiosit of the cadastre of a seigniory the opix)sition requireil by sections 40 and 41 of tlie Seitrniorial Act, is fatal and third parties interested havethe riirhttoavail themselves of it. Panct & Brosseau, !iQ,. h. \i. ill , Q. B. 1879. VI. Property Acquihkd by Ck'jwn. IIH. The respondents, theseigneiiressesof the fief Hi. Augustin,clainied certain seigniorial dues on an immoveable in th(.' fief, which the appel- lant had acipiired from the'Provincial Govern- ment in 1874, by exchange tor other property. The appellant pleaded tliat the property had been acfjuired by the Crown (or a purpose of public utility, anr rest ivy work liiere wiHioiil till' (MniHPnt of tile otiior, or, itn Jiis r.'fiwii], witts- oiit h.TviiiR caUHi'd to be suttlcd liy ex; crls the iiccessiiry iiiiaiis to iirHvent Ilie now work i'ror . viug injurious to the rights of tlie otlier. 610 (J. C. II. Possession of not Kijiivai.ext to Ri.ois- tuatios. K!.5. In an action concerning a right of pas- sage which was granted by a deed executed some twenty-eight years previously, but which was not registered until the institution of the action — ]J>ld. that, notwithstanding piibli(! use and possession during tiiat time, that such posses- sion would not serve to establish a title to a ser- vitude on the property of another, although it might prevent the acquisition of a servitude on voiir own. Strhii/cr & Cnnrf'ord, h Q. I;. R. '^'i, S. C. 187.5, A; '1. S. C. Rep. 321, Su. Ct. III. IllfiHT OF PaHSA(!E. l.Sfi. Where the proprietor of aj'oiidn citrhifi, within the iiieaning of Article 5-10 of the Civil Coile,* had enjoyeo i-onimtintoRtioii witli ths public road, mny claim a way upon that of lii-snclBhliois for the use ol his property, subject to an indpiniiily pro- portionate to the daniiige ho may cause. 540 C. C. •703 SEllVITUDfiS. striicted a stable witliin two .>r tlirpe feet ol dio plaintiir." jjropcrty, ninl willi lonrs one iiliovn th" otlicr lix)kiiis» on to tlic iiliiiniiirH proiicrtv k.i ) ftfkinj: llial the (le('cii(liint Ik- coiiiIi'in.Hirin ro- iiiovp tlic Hprvitnilc IIuh (tpiiIP(I— //c' ,\ dial a» tlip plaintiff liail in tnrn Imilt a nLpd 'Alijoh Pto|ippil tlip viow he couM n()t <'oiii|.'a:ii of the Foi-vitiiiJc. Touchette &. Iloi/, .'t Q. I.. II. 200, S. C.R. 1877. V, Water CoriisKS. 139, Action of (liini(if»pi f^r loss sntfVr tlie PonHtrnotion of ii iliini in a Wiitcr oonrsp Trhioli croPHPd plaintifl's proncrlv— /A'A/. that the Ao.t iy-2n Vio. cup. lOt, which ppriiiits pro. priptors to build damn in wiitpr ponr.ips on their property for the use if uiiIIa, creates a IcL'al servitude on the adjoinin',' irojx'rtipson to which the water is innde torell i', in consennencp ; the proprietors of which hav only a riiilit to an in- aoninity, and canm ' dciiiaiid'tlu' demolition of the dam, except win i ■ lualilc to obtain pavmctit of such indemnitv. Jtnii v. GiiHlhier, 5 Q. L. K. 1.3^t, S. V. \l. 1H79. 110. And hehl, also, ihat as the building of the dam is neitlipr an offViice nor a qiinsi ofWnw the prescription of two ypars does -lol apply to tlie claim for daniaf;es, nor is there any solida- rity between the proprietors of the constructions wliich caused tliedanuige, each Ix'ing held only for the part to which he contnbutpd. Ih. 141. 'I'hat the sppcial means provided liv the Act referred to for establishing and determining the amount of t!i ■ indemnity do' s not take away the means proviiied by the common law, which can only bp done by an expres.^ enact- ment, lb. VI. What are. 142. The plaintiff soM a property in St, Antoine suburbs, in the city of Montreal, and in tbe deed of sale inserted a clause in the t!;l!ow- ing words: " It est encore en/eiulu que ite " bati.sKe nu'&figern le ilit acauireiir sur (, i'\t " terrain sera en liqne avec celle du (lit vendfur." The vendee having resold the property his transferee commenced to build 12 ft. 6 in. in front of the line of plaintifl"s building—//- ', that the above words created a servitude, and the new building must be demolished. Hamil- ton V. Wall, 2 L. N. 210, & 24 L. C. J. 49, Q. B. 1879. 143. On the IStli of November, 1804, the Seminary conceded to one S. a farm at Sault an Reco!let, upon the condition, among others, that he shouhl furnish from I he land conceded a quantity thereof sufficient l'"r the road in front, lietween the farm thus conceded and the domain of the Seniiiinii- that he, his heirs anil assigns, should not oi ■ furnish the requisite portion ol' land for the road, but should make it, main- tain it in goo-l repair, and keep tiu' ditches and fences on each side in thorough . .Vor was the property liberated from the servitude by appellant's possession under the sheritrs title for upwards of ten year.s without molestation, as it held good as long as the road remained I'pen and used. lb. 14(). Anil in such case it was the duty of the appellant, fheo-.vner oftlie land, lo keeji the mad in repair and to ,vaca/j< ,lo rcpond u la (Ui[v St. teii'liic lie leiir toriv." ■nl (Iml S., his lit'iM mill I'tiJDy tln' tiiriii, litiijii aiDoni; dtiicrfi. ■((ereil (in tlic .'il i ,,l' ■ivrrt prior to tln' up. ■ tho ^\\enlY-ll,'ld, •itiiiie uiiJor .\r(, HID ulini,' in Miin-dii lurl •iiiiiiiin/ nf Mtiiilriutl, P. C. 1880. luilcHtill exiHtpil iiut- siilc uf llieprdptTiv, ! prdptTi y, HH lilfd to ipd-iitiDn was Hale.; Ih. ty lilierati'il ('ri)rii the irwscssioii miiji'r the A' ten years witlnnit I as limj,' as the roiul 11). wa-i the duty ol tlje land, Id hfcp the mnj the Seminary t'roni ?vvith.§ Ih. IE PEACE. ze liiipoaed on ono real beluiigliig Co a diircruiit ilischar|;c immoveablRs IcU tliey are charged." id and keeping it in re- <> Codo wore cited ; ade at ids coU, and not ervieiit laml, unlu.w the )stsl)ll»liea tlio contrary. rheti' I'la pr >nrle'()r uf ' tb" I !■' with rnnking :erci(K» and fur tlie prn- ay always tree himself lie scrv.pi'itinirn.. tKiblcs Wliicli the servitude is a or THB COURT OK l(;E IN THK DIsrillCTS INTUKAIi. advice and consent of I as loliowa; Council may order tliat 3urt 01 (Jeneril ■isons icli of the di u letsof ly, by proclamation, liv inge the same from tiiuf le. [.liPUtenant-Oovernor in ,tioii to discontinnc tliii said terms of tin' said i reaco ill cither of the ;real, and also tiv pru- .6 if, in Ills opiitioii, the each such nictrict, r. .; Vic. Chan. 7, intituled. of termsoftlie Court uf 705 SHERIFF. SETTLEMENT. I. Ok AauiiNTH, nee ACCOUNTS. SETTLlOPuS. T. Piiivir.HGK.s OK, Uniieb Act, nee EXECU- TION, lO.XK.Ml'l IONS. 11. KidiiTS OK, i>ee SQUATTERS. SETTING FIIIE. I. Indiutmknt for, .vee CRIMINAL law, In- Dnr.MK.vr. , SET-OFF-»See CO Ml'ENSATION. SEWING MACHINES. I. Pitivir.KOK OK Lk.ssor ON', see LESSOR ANDLE.SSEI':. SIGNATURE. 706 SITAREIi. -LDERS— ,Sfw COMPA- NIES, " MiPOKATIONS, ETC. ^;' \RES. i;s ON Seci'iiity I. Bavksmav .maki; At' OK, sec BANKS. JI. TuANSKliR OF, S^'C CU. VNIICS. SHERIFF. I. Pott'lvUS OF. II. Sai.k ok Lands iiy, see SALE, .Jidicial. III. Skcuuity Given iiy. I. Powers of. 147. A sheriff has no rijihl to take from if; uiljndicataire, thdosrh a creuitor, a liond for I hi purchase money, and an action Ir .'lit on such an ohliL'ation was held bau, Ufianl dit Lepiiie k Maihieu, 21 L. C. J. 2;i4, Q. U. 1«7G. in. SiRETY Given by. 148. A surety hond given by a slieriif to Iler General Ses.innsof I'uace In the districts of Quebec and Montreal," - hereby repealed; anil sub-section 2 of section 2of , iiapter H7 ot the Consididatid Stutules for Lower Canada is amended by striking; out in tlie third hue of the faid subsection 2 of the said section the fol- '"?''"'I |i ! TOTSOCI^TliS DE CONSTRUCTION. olili|;alion in favor of L. 0., nn inralvent, niiil ri'|iri'st'iii('il liv llic pliiiiititlH, Ills aHHijfiiocH, The (Iflt'lulllllt'M plt'li \\l\t tllUt lilt' (lIlliUHlion WIIH dlirKiliilcil, luiil (}. iiHirwanlM, in IHtil , ^itvc liiin a iliM'liar;:!', anil liiicr Hiill, In April, |M7{(, (i. gave liliii IiIh note I'ur fKIDO, cunliiinin;^ a pnr iiiIm> lliut ir it vvaH mil paiil it wii.h to ucipiil Ihc oliliu'iilKin dl' IIk- lU'lfnilanl. 'I'lic uiwwi'i' j .•- ciallv ilenii'ii all this, and saiii licHiiJcs lliat if niiylliin;i ol' llic kiml was diMie it wai iloiic liv (nuiil ami coniiivaiu'f, and (}. was iiotdriourtiy iiiNoKcnt at llial (ini(>. 'i'lio plainiilt a^keil tor jud){iiu'iil upon an antluMilio arti: 'l'lii> dcl't'ii- dani prodiu'cd liio Iwo docuniciits pnrporlinu! ti) diMcliarj;i' liini ; ncillicr iiarly iiiadf any proof. I'll- Citri(im~\h>eH llio rule rccinirinifan iillidavit of llii' parly doiiyiiij; llio sif^naliiri' to he lii.i own apply licri ? I tliiiik not. If lliis were oppoied to U. liiin-^clf, IiIm atliiavii wonid lie reipiircd. Tlie te.xt ii( the law in there; Imt the reiiHon of it does not apply any more lliaii the text iIoph to any hut the party liini?;hl lo have been proved under the speitial denial thai any such nritiiis; was ever madi', and tlie fraud and connivance alle).'ed aj^ainst any such ihiiii;. Judi;meut for plainlill'. Mc- laiiQiiii ii, I'lei'ost, S. C. liSTG. SIGXIFICATIOX. I. Ok TiiANriKKii, see TllAXSFER, Notick. 8K1LL. II. Oamauk-s C.vr.sKU uy Want uv, .tee DA- MAGES. SLANDER— &e IJBEL, SNOW. I. Liability FOR AcciiiEXTsCArs.:'D by Snow Fai.mxu from Roof.s of l.vn, dings, see DA- MAGES. socii;r£s de construction— See BUILDING SOCIETIES. ST AMI'S. SOLDIKUS— .Sfe« MIMTLV. 708 SOLICITORS _,S'w A DVOCATI.s, ATTORXKVS, &c. SOUS SKIX(} I'RIVt:— Set! COX- TRACTS. SI'KCIA[> RF':i'LICATION— »SVe I'LKADINO. SQUATTERS. I. Sai.k ok Imi'iuivk.mknis liv. i/il. In 1^71 appellant sold to respomient hig riirlits mid pretentions in a certain lot ol land in West (;'liester. wliiidi he had occnpieii lor several years, and which holoiiged to one (,'. in lJpI>er (".iiiada. The sale to respoiidmit wai Inr SI.'iO,!j<'i() of which was paid iu cash, and ilie balance hy two noies ot' fM) eaiili. Alter re- hjionilent hail been in possession a year C, tliu proprietor, turned np to sell the "properly he owned there. Appellant, who occupied other lots adjoiuin;;, entered into a lease with the pro- prielor, and respomient, who was very poor, asked to have his inchided in the same lease, which was done ; and respondent continued in Ilia po>sessioii withoiii trouble or fear of tronliie. He afterwards broiijrhl action to recover Ins money troni appellant, on the j:;riiund tliat the latter had {.'iiaranleed Ids possession. In ll.e Sn|ierior Court his motion was dismissed. In review the judjrment of the Superior Conrl was reversed and respondent was jjranted his con- clu-i( IIS. but in appeal the judi.'niei)t of ilie Superior Court was lestored. JJubois&. Cruleuit, Hli. L. 21.), Q. li. I«7U. STAMPS. I. Crown P].\kmi'T from Paying on Law I'ltoCKKliiNGs, .see CROWN. II. On Kills and Notks, see BILLS AND NOTES. III. On Insluance Policies.' 152. Insurance companic are liable to rep.iy the amounts paid tor st.u.ips on insurance policies under Q. ;i!) Vic. cuii. 7. Dnfi I v. >.f^i,l„rona Insunirice Cu., 3 L. N., lis, C. C. 1880. I'S. 70S '.e MIMTIA. ADVOCATKS, VS, &.J. :vt:— .%(! COX- 'S. NATION— ,>Ve NG. -:rs. IS II V. old li> rpspoiiilciii \m oiTlaiii lilt III Inn. I ill liiiil ocoiipicil l,,p 'lonnfil to one (.'. ill ' to respoiiiliMit was ptiiil in cusli, iimi tlie !|i<')(l t'acli. AlUT fc- -riioii a year C, tliu ell till' profici'ly lie ivlio oci'iipifil iiilior a loasL' wilh tlu' |)Im- wiio wii-i very |«"jr, li ill the fiirnc Ifitsi', iiinliMit coiiliimnl ill hie or fearol'tniiililc, .•tioii to ix'covci' Imh till' unniPiil llial ihe [Vj.-^CHsidii. Ill the was ilisMiisfeil. In ■ Superior Court was vas Kraiilcil his cuii- le jiidgiiu'Dt lit' the I. hiiboij) & Uroteau, 'S. ii Paying ox Law :'s, see BILLS AND MES.' are liable to repay mips on iiisiii'iuice caj). 7. Davi I v. 3 L.N., lis, C. C. 709 STOCK IX THADK. STATUS— Sf by Subrogee, see COSTS. II. Of C.iMI>ANIKS IX lllOUTS OF PllO.VOTKUS, seeCU.MI'.WIES. III. Ok Lnsl'kers, see ACTION, I.NTEHEST i\. SUBSCEIPTION. I. DKMniHEii TO Action on, see PLEADING, Demukukk. II. To Uaii.wav hv MiNiciPAi. CoRroiiA- Tio.\s,,svr MONTREAL. III. To Stock i.\ Companies, see COM- PANIES. SUBSTITUTION. I. Alienation of Si'BSTniTEi) Property. II. CcRATOK Cannot Plrciiase Pkoi-erty OF. III. Of Attorneys, see ATTORNEYS. IV. Prohuution to Alienate. V. RiiiiiTs OF SiiisTiTuiES, See USU- FRUCT. VI. RioHTs OF Parties Under. VII. Tl'TOK TO, cannot PlltClIASE PROPERTY OF. VIIL What IS. I. Alienation of Si'hstituteu Property. 157. Grer6s de substiliitior are proprietors, and though they cannot bind the nppelds ihey can alienate the substituted property, and their acts of alienation are valid until the cjiening of the substitution. I'ouliot k Fraser, 3 Q. L. R. 349, S. C. 1877. II. Curator Cannot Purchase Property or. 159. A curator to a substitution cannot b" interposing a third por.wn purchase the im- niuvealile property of the substitution when sold by licitatiou. Benuit & Benuit, 8 R. L. 425 Q. B. 187(). IV. Prohibition to Alienate. 159. By 18 Vic. cap. 250 appellant and his brother were authorized to sell certain entailed property in consideration of a non-redeemable rent representing tlie value of the property. On 7th September, 18t)0, appellant and E, E. assigned to their brother A. 1^'. a piece of land lorninig part o*' the aliove entailed property m coiisideralioii of a rente J'onciire of si.\ p'nu'ids, payable the hrst day oi Oclu'jer of each year. The deed was registered and contained the lollowing stipulation : " But it is agreed that "the a.rsignee cannot alienate in any manner " whatsoever the said land nor any part thereof " to any person witliout the express and wriiten " consent, of the as.-igiiors under penalty of " the nullity of tiie said deed " The property wassubsequently seized by h jadgnieiit creditor of A. F., and appeliant opposed tlie .-ale and asked that the seizure be declared null, be- cause the property seized could not be .sold by rea.-on of the iitiove prohibition to alienate — held, on appeal, a!iirm,i:g the judgment of the court below, that tlie deed was made in ucuorii- ance witii the provisions of 18 Vic. cap. 250, ana being a purely onerous title on its lace tlie prohibition to alienate containeU m said deed was void. Faser la I'uuliot, 4 S. C. Re 616. Su. Ct. I87yi U70 C. U." VI. Rights of Parties Uxi>ek. 100. The plaintitr and his sister claimed under the will of their lather that two pieces of land which had liillen to the t^hare of their brother deceased in a provisional pariage of substituted properties had returned to iheni, liecause the Uecea,sed brother lelt no lejiitimate issue to take up the substitution at Ins death, and they a.sked that the delendaiits be con- demned to restore the two IiHs or their value. Jlcld, that land purchased by the yrcv^ de subMituliuii, arising out t' the redemption of a constituted rent which belongs to the substitu- tion, takes the p ace in all respects ol the con- stituted rent, so much so that the appelas lo the .substitution have a right to the land or its value, and not merely to the value of the con- stituted rent. Guy ,»; (Juy, 22 L. C. J. 213, Q. B. 1877. 1(11. And, in another case, arising out of the same properly, to v hich the thirty - ears' pre- scrijition was pleaded— i/eW, that a usulruc- tuaiy couKi confer '10 title ou which prj»criplion coulo be (bunded. (Juy ic Oiiy, 2 L. N. lUi), S. C. I87y. ltJ2. And in still another case, arising out of the same piH)perty, plaintitl' brought action to recover the t'liference between the salue of the property asfounu by the experts alte/ ihejudg- iiieni in their favor and the value ol it ai the time of the death of the brother, fiom whom • The prohibition to alienate things sold or oonvevcd by purely oueroua title .in void 870 '.C. ""^ ''"""}'"' 713 SUCCESSION. SUMMARY CONVICTIONS ACT. 714 they claiiiiPiI three yearf< previonn]^ — Held, tliat 110 suuh rijrlit existed, especially &f the pro- perty was entailed on their children, and tliev coiili) not have sold it in anv case, so that "t made no difl'erence to them Whether tlu-y got the thingthat has since ditninislieil in value, or whether they gut the now diniinislieil va'ue of the thing. Gui/ & Guy, 2 L. N. 110, S. C, 1879. VII. Tutor to, cannot Purchase Property OF. If),"?. On the merits ot'a petition ei> niiUitd d<; decrei it appeared that the defendant, Liutli per- sonally and in his quality of tntor to the substi- tution created in favor of' the minor children of wlioni the petitioner was tutor, cau-ed to be sold by voluntary licitation the land in question be- longing to the succession of wliicli his wife was one of the heirs. The deed of sale was passed to one Goyette, who the same dav signed a declaration that he liad bought the land for the account and prcfit of the defendant, one of the vendors named in said deed of sale, and that lie had only lent his name to thedefcndant in doing so. Defendant was a parly to this declaration and uiade llie (bed his own persona' alt'uir — Held, that the delendant, from his position as tutor to the substitution, could not buy the land, and that the sale was conseqiientlv' a nullitv. L'awley & Monarqiie & Quintal, 3 L. N. 114, S. C. 1880. VIII. What is. 104. Where by a will it was stijinlated that : " Pou)- ma dite 'epouyejovif ile la E.\TH. SUMMARY CONVICTIONS ACT. I. Certiorari from Conviotiok ukdkk. lee CERTIORARI. f ;■ 1 1 J "11 716 SURETYSHIP. SURETYSHIP. 716 SUMMAEY TRIAL- &e CRIMINAL LAW. I, Amending Act, nee C. 42 vie. cap. 44. SUMMONS. I. Writs of, see WRITS. SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION. I. Powers of, see COMMON SCHOOLS. SUPPLIES. T. To Vessels, Liadility for, see MER- CHANT SHIPPING. SUPREME COURT. I. Appeal to, see APPEAL. SURETIES. I. In Appeal, see Appeal. SURETYSHIP. I. Acceptance of Gtauantee. II. Action hy Sirety. III. Aoree.ment to pay Commissionto Sure- ty IS Legal. IV. Claim OF Surety on Insolvent Estate OF Debtor. V. CoNTiNi'iNfi, .see WARRANTY. VI. Delay Given to Dehtor. VII. Discharge of Screty. VIII. l>isciss[0N OF Principal. IX. Judicial Sureties, .see CAPIAS. X. Liability of Suhety. Of' Official As.fitpiee appointed by Creditors, *eei:iSC)LVKNCY'. iV/iile Appeal I'endint/, see CAPIAS. XI. Of Wife for Husband, see MARRIAGE CONTRACI'S. XII. Power of Surety. X?II. Surety Released by Fraud, see IN- SOLVENCY. I. Acceptance of Guarantee. 169. Tlie (let't'iulant wlio wa< receiving large qn iiitifie- of ItMllici- iroin uiio II., a tamu'r, ami iiileiesteil in llie succe.-s o\' liix Imsirn's,-, wrote t(i plaiiititt' tlial iC lie wniiM I'lul'.rse tur H. to tlie e.xteiit of 12,000 lie, ilflfii.liiiit, woiilii iiolil aiiv surplus fnnii (lie sale tEEN LICENSES-See LICENSE LAW. TAXATION. I ExFvrTioN FROM, see RELIGIOUS IN- STITUTIONS. II Of Bills of Costs, .tee COSi S. IIJ Power OK Fuovr-iCiAL LEOii^rATrHE to U?L, ^ee LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. TAXES— See MUNICIPAL COR- PORATIONS. I. Action for. II. Apportionment of Betwekn Tenants, see LESSOR AND LESSEE. III. Interest on, see INTEREST. IV. Prescription of, see PRESCRIPTION, V . Recovery or, when Paid in Error, see ACTION en Repetition. I. Action for. 1. A li'psor has no right toan action for taxes due umlcr the lease until he lias hitiiseiC paid to the Corporation. MailU v. liichler, 2 L. N. 414, S.C. 1879. IV. Prescription of. 2. The taxes of the City of Montreal cannot pr rihed inside thirty vears. Gnu I Normandeau, 21 L. C. J. 300, S. C ibVi. 720 721 TEMPERANCE. TESTAMENTARY EXECUTRIX. 722 n TELEGRAMS. I. Eruors in Transmission op, see INSUR- ANCE. 725 .'. 725 . ION 725 725 725 726 726 726 727 727 727 728 7.32 732 7.32 733 733 NITY 733 733 733 733 , 733 734 • MMISSIONERS. 734 .USTEES 734 734 734 NICIPAL COR. :ioNs. OF Between Tenants, sSEE. INTEREST. , see PRESCRIPTION. iKN Paid in Ebrok, set N. Tht toaii action for taxes til lie lidK iiiinseir paid 'ailli V. liichler, 2 L. N. 3ity of Montreal cannot thirty vearc. Guv t, J. 300, S. C 1»77.' TELEGEArH COMPANIES. I. Liability of, 3. A telegraph company is responaihle to the party to whom the message is directeo be of a benevolent character lor the support of widows and orphans and of sick members. The only clause which might eMcit comment as of a singular description read.- as follows! — "Ari. Xlll. "Tout membre qu'ou troll vera a creer une division parmi nous rela- tivenient a I'organizatioii d'une autre associa- tion, en opposition a celle-ci, sera denonce comnie le plus ' viliiin Gueux,' et son nom devra etre connu a tout-'s les Societes de Tail- leurs de pierre a retranger." If it be true, as is probadle, that this epithet means that the offending member is under the ban of the society everywhere, it is plain that ihe work of bencvi"). lence is not the only aim of the society. We have at any rate tins fiict, that the funds of the society wc-e used to support members in the time of a strike, and also to send its members by scores to foreign parts, at a time when work couiu tie had iierc. it is also in evidence ilint meniberfi of the society are contributing 25 cents per week to the expenses of the defendants in 1 )! 1 ' « ■ 1 i ill .ti 727 TRANSACTION. TRANSFER. 728 tliiH Miit, tlioMjili tlie witiiesH, Dulnin, who gives tliis iiituriMiitioM, adds that those only cuntri- luilfil to tlie (Icfence fiirul who pica.-eil to do so. Bill the olleriiij.'H are received hy Joseph I?er- liiiiid, the treasurer ol tiie society. On tlie 5th July it was uiianiiiiously jyreed to tiiat "tons ceiix qui out I'le tronver les avooats jioiir int'or- iiiation soit tons payes," itc. This was a few days alter the institution of plaintilf's aetion. On tlie ISth Oetolier, 187(i, it was proposed and sccoiideii thai all the superintendents enlleot the iiKiiicy due the widciws imil the cfJiilrihutioiis of tlie lawsuit. On the 'jritli Octoher it was pro- posed and seconded that the secretary notify the iiieuihers sued iinil llie witnesses, in order to imiiie a coiiiinittee to come to an iinder.-tandini.' with the lawyers a-ked hy them. There has hecn Senile ditlicnlty in extracting from witnesses all the facts which the cuiinsel lor the plaiiitilf desired to made puhlio. The witnesses were un- willing and evasive. Nevertheless a numlier of signilicant facts have hecn eslahlished, and there has hcen proved beyond a douhl the exis- tence of an association many of whose opera- tmns are unlawful in the extreme. It ])roves the existence of a nefarious and most ahomin- ahle conspiracy against the rights of every citi- zen to make such contract as he plea>es for such price as he pleases. No comhination of men can be tolerated which shall dictate to others what they shall do. Each man is free to do as he pleases so loiij' as order in a well governeil coniuiunity ia observed, and so long as the liberty of others is not violateil. I find here that Narcisse Valiii, the piaintilf, had been a member of the society, but he had olfended against its rules and was put under its ban — was " scuhhi" to use their significant but coarse expression . He certainly was deprived of work by its will and the will of its members in May, 187G, and probably a portion of June. The de- fendants were members of the society and re- spdnsible tor the damages sutl'ered by the plain- tiff, and the damages under the circumstances should be exeiii]ilar\'. The court takes into consideration the character <.if the otleiice, the unlawfulness of the acts complained of, and do- ing so, the judgment will go against the defen- dants jointly and severally lor the sum of $500 and the costs of the suit. Valin & Lebnm, S. C. 1877. TEADING. I. In Real Estate not a Com.mercial Matter, see PARTNERSHIP. TRADITION— /^>e DELIVERY. TRANSACTION. 1. Effect of. 17. Wliere the defendants in a petitory ection in order to a settlement agreed to return and re- lease to the plaintill a portion of the land in dis- pnte, and the piaintilf accepted the arrangeinent — Ifilil, that it was binding on both parties, and where it was not carried out, owing to liiults on both siiies, the costs of an action to enforce it would be borne by each. Vliciiavd & LaJ'ond & Desroberis, (l L. U. 1)0, Q. B. 1880. II. What is. in. A deed of resiliation of a donation ob- tained by fraud and dul, and without considera- tion of the legal cpieslions involved, does not constitute a iriiiisaciinn in terms of lOlH C. C. Buutiici/ iV: Ji'ic/iunl, 'U L. C. J. ;!0, 1878. .i;xT. TRANSFER. I. ACCKI'TAXCK OF. II. Effkctof, .9« PAYMENT. III. How Attackkii wiiiox Ehaidi IV. Ix pRAtll OK CrKIIITOUS. V. LlAIIII.lTY OF TUAXSFERUEE OF StOCK IN Tit A II I.. V'l. Nature of, mc INSURANCE. VH. Notice of. VIII. Of Claims iiy Garnishee Order TAKES AWAY RUJIIT OF AoTIOX. IX. Of Immoveahi.k afteu Action Brought. X. Of Insurance, sw INSURANCE. XI. OFREcoiuis,,svf PROTHONOTARY. XII. Of Sharks, .w,j COMPANIES. XIII. Of AVakkhouse Receipt, see WARE HOCSE RECEIPT. XIV. Right of Transferree. XV. With Warranty. I. Acceptance of. 19. A transfer of bank shares by a father to his minor son, by a deeil in whici. the father appears both lor himself and his son, the donee, is void lor want of legal acceptance. Walsh v. Union Hank, 5 Q. L. R. 289, S. C. 1879. III. How Attacked when Fraudulent. 20. A transfer in fraud of creditors may he attacked on the contf^tation of the garnish«f"s declaration. Kani: & Racine, 3 L. N. 60, & 24 L. C. J. 210, Q. B. 1880. IV. In Flaud of Creditors, see DONA- TION, SALE. 21. An appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, maintaining a contestation of the declaration made bv the Hern saisis. appel- lants. Respondent liail a judgment against cue L., and was disposed to enforce it; but appel- lants, for whom L. was working, told him not to lie in a hurrv, that L. was going to receive money from them, and then he, respondent, would lie paid. Appellant did not admit that he undertook to be surety for the money. In March, L., having completed his operations at tiir vrrd'tiiivY , traiirfefi'rtl to the ^ppe:::x::is a largr part of hisettects, and became insolvent. There- upon respondent, surprised at this, took out a !R. 728 729 TEANSFER. TRANSFER. 730 1 of tlie lain) in (lis- 0(1 tlic ariniii.'ciiient 111 both piii'tieH, mill owing to liiultH on motion to I'lilbree it iriiavd & Lafond & B. 1880. of a donation ob- witliont c'lmsiilcra- iiivdlvcil, (lofH not rMiys,«ession for anv time of the bricks mentioned in the trannicc—Held, that the transfer wa« merely a pledge of the bricks, which was n*«\er completea by delivery, and wa.s therefore inoperative, null anil void, »nd must be set aside. Lemay in rt:, 6 Q. L. R. 35, S. C. R. 1879. 24. A commercial firm made a voluntary asBig- • ....ol'thcia- stock, etc., to Ueftndaiil, who took possession and paid some of the credi- tors, but not the phiintill The linn wa.s in reality insolvent, the assets being insufTicient to pay in full— //tW, tiiat deliendant was liable to all the creditors efjiially, but as be had not i '^adeil the insolvency of the estate he must |)ay s; diitil! in full, Du'guuu v. Seath,2 L. N. 108, &. C. 1879. 25. Much the same principle was laid down in another case, whicli arose, howcvei, in a different way. A quantity of timber was pledged by way of wurehouse receipt for the payment of a draft, and if the dralt was not paid the holder was to sell the wood and place the proceeds to theowner's credit. The owner, some months afterwards, became insolvent, the dralt was not jiaid, and the jdedt'ee sold the wood of which he never bud actual delivery — Jlcld, that the jiledgee could not place "the balance of the proceeds of the sale alter pay- ment of the dralt to the credit of a IbruiPr in- debtedness of the owner. Perkiii.i & Ji'oss, G Q. h. R. 05, k 10 R. L. 2G3, Q, B. 1880. 2(i. Plaintilf having a judgment against de- fendant transferred it immediately to his son, in order to avoid its being set o'lf by a judg- ment which defendant was about to get against him. Defendant obtained judgment against him. and when plaintiff proceeded to e.vecution set it up in compensation. Per Curiam.— In this C(.iiitestatioii there is brought belore the court the merits of the transfer by plaintiff to iiis son, 15th November, 1879. The son id endeavoring to levy theaniouiitof the judgment of date 7th Noveiiiber, 1879, and the defendant is setting oil against it his judgment of date 29tli November, 1879, for |250 and co.ats, in- voking the fraudulent character of transfer by plaintilf to his son. I am of opinion that this transfer should be disrewirded and set aside, as tiiade in fraud of the rights of defendant. Plain- tiff' appears to be a man without means. The attachment was wantonly made, and the pro- perty in his house does not belong to him. Opposition maintained. Watson v. Thompson & Thompson, S. C. 1880. V. Liability op Traksferree of Stock in Trade. 27. F., a merchant, transferred his stock in trade to tlie defendant, a creditor, as security, hut continued the business in his own name as lie- fore. A counter agreement was also entered into between them stipulating that the transfer would be null from the moment that F. should have paid the debt by him due to the defendant. F. afterwards purchased from the plaintiffs goods for the purposes of the busine.ss, and gave a promissory note for them, signed by himself. The note not being ^aid at maturity action was taken against the dclendanf the transferree, tor the price — Held, tiiat having profited by the transaction, although his name was not'men- tioned in it, he was liable for the debt, and that F. should be considered as his agent. Vezina & Cote, 3 Q L.R. 32, C. C. 1875. Vn. Notice of. ffi. Where a ?ebi allows judgment to be taken against him •• > i '^eon a translerred clai m, he cannot afterwui > ippeal from such judgment on the ground thai d to was no eignification of iiJ 731 TRANSFER. TREATING. 732 I t b : I the transfer. Stanley v. Ilanlon, 21 L.C. J. 75, Q. n. 187fi. 2'J. P. & Co. sold some goods to defendant, nnil P. now sued alone, alleii^inf; liiiiiself to be entitled to collect Ihedelilsdne to the firm, which liad been dissolval — Ifdil, that the action must be di'^iMissed. A suit could not be brought bv one nieniber of a linn, supported by the evid- ence of tbo other member, where no notice had been jriven. Prescoii & O'Brien, H. C. lH7fi. 30. When the ctsaionaire of a claim had accepted notice of the transfer, but no service or oilier Higiiiflcatiou had been made — Held, thai the censionaire only had the right to sue and recover tlie amount of the transfer. lier- thelot V. Theoret, 1 L. N. 3H7, S. C. R. 1875. HI. And in another case, in which an heir had sold all ills rights in the succession of his father to a third party, and had caused the deed of i-ale to be duly registered, but the transfer had not been signified — Held, reversing the judgment of the court of first in.«tance,* that a deed of sale or succession of droits de succf.i.iion , duly enrcgistered, does not require eignilication, and therefore an acte sons s6ing pr/i'^ subsequently passed between the parties, purporting to annul and set aside the deed of cession, but which acte has been neither re- gistered nor signified, does not give the ccdant a right of action. Sauv6 v. Sauvi, 1 L. N. 54fi, S. C. R. 1878. 32. Action in declaration of a hypothec for the balance of a price of sale transfer. ■•■• i ; the plaintiff. He obtained judgment, ar-'^ li'-ii'insant inscribed in review, on the ground i'^W -jh'.u ol want of notice of the transfer— 7? ''■' tin'.i as the transfer had been registered xhm in^' Rcdon was a sutficient notice of it. 1011. i i.'i*. 6. C. R. i8.t 33. Declaration ot tiers saisi in answer to the attachment was that he owed nothing. His de- claration was contested, and it was sought to be made out that he really was indebted under a building contract. It appearal, however, that the contractors, finding themselves unable to carry on the work, had made a transfer to H., who took the contract otl their hands, and tiers saisi had paid H. for the work, which he did. Tiie plaintitt'said that this could not relieve the tiers saisi, because the transfer was not signi- fied until two days after the attachment was Berved. The court, however, was against the plaintilFs pretension that the transfer was one which came under the article of the Code re- quiring signification. Seeing the declaration made \\\ the agreement by the original contrac- tors, that they were unable to go on with the work, ^/er.» sawi was justified in paying H. for the work performed bv him. Besides this, there was not sutficient evidence to establish that any money was due. The contestation, therefore, must be dismissed as not supported by evidence. Versailles V, Paquei & Waddell, T. S., S. C. 1879, IX. Op Immoveable Afteraction Brought. 34. The female opposant opposed the seizure • 1 L. N. 387 S. 0. t Title of case not reported. made of certain land abandoned by the defctid- ant. She alleged that she was proprietO! in jK)ss('Hsion on 22nd January, 1879, dale i ; llio deldissement, Ihiil on Ihe2tith .June, 1877, the defendant sold the land to opposuiit, and her deed was duly registered on the 22nd .January, WS — /A'/i/, that as the (h*ed was not registered prior to the institution of the action it conlerred no title as against the creditor bringing the actioii.* La Siieiiti de C'lmslruction Melropnlitaine v. Beauchami) & David, 3 L. N, 135, 8. C. 1880. XIV. RlOIIT.S OK TRANaFKKREE. 36. The parties, plaintifi'and defendant, were advocates, and had been en sociM as such, and had during the time they were en suciM pur- chased with the funds of the .v()c((?/^ a number of shares in the building society mis en cause. The parties had since dis.solved partnership, ;iiid defendant had transferred to plaintill, by actf of transfer, regularly notilieil to the mis en vnuse, all his interest in the said shares. Plaintiff now sued for the money arising from said shares, und asked that the building society mis en cause lie condemned to pay the money to him, with co-ts against defendant, his quondam partner. Defen- dant pleaded that plaintill owed him a consiiler- able balance, and had always kept tli' books of the partnership, and refused to render an ac- count — Htld, that he could not plead money due him by the transferree in order to defeat plaintitrs rights under the transfer. Gauthier & Roy & La iSociM de Construction Permanente de Quebec, 10 R. L. 443, Q. B. 1880. XV. With Warranty. 36. The transferree of a claim cannot sue the transferror on his ^ruarantee to Journir and /aire valoir without having first discussed the pro- perty of the debtor and established legally his complete insolvabilitv. Labelle & Sayer, 10 R. L. 545, S. C.R. 1880. 37. And such insolvability cannot be estal)- lish by means of verbal testimony. 76. TEAVAIL MITOYEN— &e TRES- PASS. TRAVELLEES. I. Rights of, see BAILMENTS, CARRIERS, HUTELKEEPEllS. TREATING. I. At Elections, see ELECTION LA W. * The AlioT*fttUni nf nn tnimnvfiahli' by the, holflpr ngHliiHt whom the liypotliecary (lotion is liroiiglil is ot no elFect against the creditor bringing the uetiiiii, unless the purchaser deposits the amount of the debt. Interest and costs due to such creditor. 2074 C . C. }. 732 783 TUGS. TUTORSHIP. 784 neil by the (Icfoml- wft't proprietor in , 1H79, date I ; the h .fuiip, 1877, the KiHunt, and licrilccil 2nil.Juniiftry, lH7iS not regiHicrcd prior jn it coiili'rrcd no rin(;i'iv;tiu> action.* Mehuivolitaiiie v. f, 135, 8. C. 1H80. HRKK. ,nd dpf'endant, wore ociiti as sucli, ami vere en socUU piir- 3 sociMi a nuinlier siety mis en caiixe. ed partnership. u«(l ])laiiitifl, by art>' of ) the iiii.t en cditiie, ures. Plaint ill now oni said fharew, uml ity WJ?,» en cause he ' to him, with costs am partner. Delen- ^ed him a conHider- < kept the books of d to render an ac- tiot plead money in order to deleat ransler. Gauthier ruction Permaneate i. 1880. aim cannot sue tlie a Journir and fiiire discnssed the pro- aliflhed legally his ')elle & Suyer, 10 y cannot he eHtah nony. lb. J— See TRES- EPtS. NTS, CARRIERS, G. CTIONLAW. ^eablo hy tlip liolder (!tioii is brouglii is of ging the actiiin, unless it of the debt, interest D74 C. C. TRESPASS. I. Of Cattle, see ACTION Qui Jam. II. What is. 38. Defendant was Bued for having gone on plaintitf's latid and dug holes in it. The holes were, it appeared, of a very trifling character and were for a travail mitmjen—lleld, no tres- pasH. Aresse v. Dubreuil, 2 L. N. 24G, S. C. R. 1879. TRIAL— See CRIMINAL LAW. TRIPARTITE MARRIAGE MUNITV. COMMUNITY— ,S«e CONTRACTS, Com- TROURLE. I. Fear of, see SALE, Eviction. TRUSTEE— See LEGATEE. I. Effect of Signing as, see AGENCY, Liability of Agent. II. Of Turnpike Roads, see TURNPIKE ROAD. TRUSTS. I. Act Concernijo, see Q. 42-43 Vic. cap. 29. II. Rights of Trv'tee. 39. B., as trnstee for H. C. & Co., deposited with D. twelve bonds of the M. C. ife S. Rail- way Company as collateral security, to be availed of only subsequent to the failnre of tlie Government to pay $10,000 subsid previously transferred to D., and obtained a rec. pt from D. that on the subsidy being paid D. would return these bonds to B. The subsidy was paid, and B. sued D. to recover the twelve bonds. H. C. & Co. did not intervene — Held, that B. being a party personally liable on the bills held by D., which the Government subsidy of $10,000 transferred, was intended to pay, and having complied with the conditions menti ned in the receipt entitled him to recover possession of the bonds as against D., the legal owner of the bonds. Drummondic, Baylis, 2 S. C. Rep. 61, Su. Ct. 1877. TUGS. I. Liability 0F,«ee MARITIME LAW, Towage TURNPIKE ROADS— See TOLL. TURNPIKE ROAD COMxMISSION- ERS. I. POWER.4 rip. 40. By order in council of IGth Jannnry, 1H8(I, the Government of the Province of Qn(dieo revoked the (Commission of the South Shore Turnpike Road Commissioners and named others. The commisHioners whose commissiona were thus revoked discharged the inspector be- fore the term of his engagemei !iad expired, and apiK)iiit«l the plaintiff in hi' :e, with a stipu- lation that he should not -tdiarged before the expiration of three yv.,,-, except lor bad conduct. The new commissioners, however, refused to recognize the engagement of the plaintiflT and re-instated the former inspector who had been tlischarged. On action hy the plaintiff for his salary— i/eW, thai the law gave to the commissioners the power to {lismiss an inspector at pleasure, and the agreement not to discharge the plaintiff lietbre three years was illegal and null, and could not bind their succes- sors in office. Hanison v. Les Stjndics des Che- mins il natriire de la Rice Sud, 6 Q. L. R. 86, C. C. 1880. TURNPIKE ROAD TRUSTEES. I. LlADILlTV OF. 41. Action of damages for an accident caused by the bad state of a temporary road con- structed by the Corporation of Montreal in con- nection with the new anueduct, to serve the place of the portion of tlie turnpike road of which the appellantsare trustees, necessarily cut off during the progress of said works.— //eW, that as the defendants had taken toll, they were bound to provide a good road. Trustees of Montreal Turnpike Roads & Daoust, 1 L. N. 506, & 23 L. C. J. 175, Q. B. 1878. TUTOR. I. To Suhstitution cannot buy Land op Substitution, see SUBSTITUTION. TUTORSHIP. I. Accounting, see ACCOUNTS. II. Accounts of. III. Action by Tutor. IV. Appointment of Tutor. V. Liability of Tutor for Costs in Action FOR Account ok, see COSTS. VI. Pleading hy Tutor, see PLEADING. Vn. Power of Tutor. Vi..!. Registration OF. IX. Rights of Tutor. f II ' 'I 1 m ■.'h IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1 // fe. m Uf -% 1.0 i.l 11.25 1^ 1^ 2.5 2,2 2.0 U 116 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 ,\ iV <^ ^ ^.\ ;\ 'O" ..^ 4i^ "^U,. ^^L # // r/. s % 735 TUTORSHIP. TUTORSHIP. 736 ■ , If. AccorsTs OP. 42. In nil notion by n minor nirniiiPt lier tutor to ncciiuiit— //./(/, (lint linxiiij; nccepted an account and npproveii of it while she was only eninnci|int(il by iiiarriiigc, was ohligeii to ask to be released t'roin it before she could get an order aL'ninst tlie tutor to render another ac- count, of bis tutorship. J)t'i/riin>ieiltirs ii lii-ii.hwu 24 L. C, J. 170, Q. H.'l877. 4;i. In nil nction agninst n tutor to account — //(.''/, tliat a tiitorwasrelieveil tnun his linbility to render nn account of liis tutorship because lie choulcl have in his hands a small sum of nioiiev wliich he has dislmrsed to the knowledjre of the 11 inoi , since bconie major, and done other acts of adniiiiistration since ratified bv the minor. Pellitier,\c I'dktier, 10 U. L. 47G/S. C. 1879. III. Action by Tdtoh. 44. Inscription from n Judgment rendered in the Circuit Court nt Terrebonne against the the (lelendanl for $85, lor the occujiation of a lot in the villnge of St. Andrews. The action was broiiglit as tutor to the minor children of W H. C. and to the minor child of C. J. C. to recover $170 ; and the occupation alleged was for the time between tlie deatlisof the parents of the minors and the subsequent purchase of the property by the defendant from the plaintiti' under authority on the 1st February, 1875. The defenilant pleade-l, 1st, a demurrer to the de- clarnliun on the grounds that it did not allege a right of action in the tutor, either under a lea.se or under any special promise. This was dismissed, the allegation of the promise by the defendant being held sufficient. The defen- dant pleaded further tlint the twoCs. to whose cliildren the plaintiti" was tutor had held the froperty in question jjdr imliris ; that in June, 8(18, C. J. became in.solvent, and made an assignment! and that the plainlili' was only entitliil to sell one-half as representing the children ofW. H., the other halflieing vesteti in the assignee of C. J. That the defendant had paid $\m, the price of the lot, to the plaintiti', and was therefore entitleil to set otl half of that Bum agnin.st this demand ; thedefendant further pretended that there had been no authority given to the plaintiti" to receive the price at all, which ought to have remained secured on the property. The judgment ninintaiiied the defen- dant's pretensions as to the ine-half. As reganls the question of compensntion raised against the ilemand for the other half, the answer was, the nlaintiffwas tutor to thechildren oftwo persons, lie held two offices ; what the defenilant sought to oppose to the demaml of W. H.'s children or to their tutor was not a debt due in his capacitv of tutor to those children, but merely a claim for money paid in error to him in the other and distinct otfice of tutor to the children of C.J, Judgment contirnied. Clunk v. Ladmiceur, S. C. R. 1877. IV. ArpOINTME.NT OP TUTOH. 4.5. The recommendation of a mnjnrity of a family council touching tlie appointment of a tutor to a minor should be homologated by the prothonotary if there be no legal inip3diment or objection to such appointment, and, other things being equal, the preference should lie given to a mtenial relative ; anil where the prothonotary followed the advice of one maternal relative of the minor in preference to that given by twelve paternal relatives, and no cause was shown why the person recommemled by the paternal rela- tives should not be appointed, his decision was overruled by the court, and the choice of the paternal relatives adopted, ^miili & Baptist & Tugycy,2'i L. C. J. 191, Q. B. 1874. VII. POWKR OF TuTon. 46. A tutrr may bring or defend an action on behalf of the minor without the authorization of a family council. Breakey v. Carter, 4 Q. L. R. 333, S. C. 1878; 304 C. ti. VIII. Registration of. 47. In nn action by a tutor for an alimentary allowance for an illegitimate cWM—IIeld, that where the tutor alleges rei»istration, and it is not especiallv denied, it will be held to be admitted. Poi'ssant & Barrette, 3 L. N. 12, Q. B, 1879. IX. Right of. 48. It is no answer to a tutor who seeks for aliments for a ward to say : " I should be tutor, and I will take care of the child." Puinsant & Barrette, 3 L. N. 12, Q. B, 1879. u. SUMMARY OF TITLES. ULTHA PETITA 737 ULTRA VIRES 737 UXDKR TENANT 737 UNDIVIDED OWNERSHIP 73} UNDUE INFLUENCE 737 UNIVERSAL LEGATEE 737 USUFRUCT 737 HIP. 738 one-half. As refianis nil raised iijraiust the thi' aiiMwer wuh, ilie ililrcii ol'two jxTHoriP, e dof'endarit soujilit to I . H.'fi cliildrt'ii (ir to Itie in Ills capacity of t merely a claim for 111 in the other and he children of C. J. lunie V. Ladiiticeur, TOR. 1 of a majority of a le appointment of a hoiiiulofiated hy the legal iiii|3dinient or 'nt, and, other things ."hould lie given to ere the prothonotnry maternal relative of that given by twelve iiiw was hIiowii why by the paternal rela- ed, his decision was id the choice of the Sviith & Bapiist & B. 1874. defend an action on the authorization of V. Carter, 4 Q. L. H. or for an alimentary imate child — Held, a rei'istratioii, and it will be held to be rrette, 3 L. N. 12, tutor who seek.? for "I should be tutor, 3hild." Foinaant & 1879. 737 737 737 737 USUFRUCT. ULTRA PETITA— .9ee JUDG- MENTS. ULTIIA VIIJES-^.'<3 LEGISLA- TURE OF QUEBEC. I. What i.s, see STREET RAILWAY. 1 Gommissionera for the civil erection of narishes— //(■/,/, to have acted ultra vires in homologating an acte o/culiza/iiui made bv the church fabriqiie. La Fubriinie dc la Parnissi; du St. Kiijnut Jesus v. I'oirier, 23 L. C. J. loo, S. C. 187'J, UNDER TENANT— &e LESSOR AND LESSEE. UNDIVIDED OWNEKSHIP- I'ARTITION. -See UNDUE INFLUENCE. I. At Elections, see ELECTION LAW. UNIVERSAL LEGATEE-&e EX- ECUTORS, LEGATEES. USUFRUCT. I. Attachmknt of. II. Donation of. III. LlAUIl.ITV OP USCFRUCTUAUY. USUFRUCT. 738 IV. Power of Usi'FRncTUARY. V. What is, see SUBSTITUTION. 1. Attachment of. 2. Theusufructol'furnitureand things which, without being actually consumed, deteriorate by usage, and which are held in usufruct, eaniiot be seized and sold bv the creditors of the usu- fructuary. Bertranil v. Pepin, G Q. L. R. 352, C. C. 1880. II. Donation of. 3. A universal donation in usufruct by con- tract of marriage is a donation causa mortis. Jludoii & I'ainchaud & liimrd, 3 L. N. 414, & 24L. C.J. 2G8,Q.B. 1880. III. LlADIMTY Oi' UsUFRCCTUARY. 4. A widow against whom judgment has been obtained as universal usufructuary of her liiis- baiid deceased i.s in the same position as a uni- lallv liable tlir the d ard. 3 L. N. 414. Jir. 24 I.. V, .1 9(W n i: 1880. versal legatee, and is personally lia.,„- i,,i uic amount of the judgtiieiii. lludon k ruiiichaud .t liirard, 3 L. N. 414, & 24 L. C. J. 208, Q. B. IV. PoWEIl OF UsUFRCCTDARY. 5. The usufructuary of a piece of land qrevi de sut/.ililulii)ii in liivor of his children sold to the defendants the right to take sand Irom the property fbr tive yea>>s. At the death of the usulriictuary, liis children, the substitueea, brought action to recover the value of the sand so taken, on the ground that the usufructuarv had no power to make such a sale— //f/i/, that the terms of art. 400 of the CivilCode include also sand beils, and the plaintitl's were, therefore, entitled to recover the value of the sand so taken, such value to be based on its value at the time the substitution opened.* Dut'resiie v. Bulmer, 21 L. C. J. 98, 1877, & 1 L. N. S. C. 303, (j. B. 1878. •Coiiarmeil iu Su. Ct. V. SU:\I]\rARY OF TITLES VACATION 739 VALUATION ".'".'.' 739 VENDITIONI EXPONAS ....'.""" 739 VENDORS AND PURCHASERS 7.39 VENUE 739 VERDICT 739 VESSELS '■" 740 VETERINA HY SURGEON '..'.".' 740 VICE REDHIBITOIRE 740 VIEWS 740 VIS MAJOR 740 VOID AND VOIDABLE ."" 740 VOL 740 VOLUNTARY SERVICES 740 VOLUNTEERS 740 VOTING 740 VOUCHERS ].„. 740 ^ . . :|JI i X. i I 739 I I I! ! VEKDICT. VACATION. I. Powers of Jcdoe ik. 1. During the long vacation a judge lias the Baiiie jwwiTH tliat he luis at any other time of tlie year willi reHpect to matters" to be done out of term. Nn/an v. Bantous, 4 Q. L. R. 33/>, 8. C. K. 1878. VALUATION. I. Of Land in Cases of Expropriation, see EXPKOPKIATION. VENDITIONI EXPONAS. I. Opposition to, see OPPOSITION. VENDORS AND PURCHASERS— See SALE. I. Delegation op Price. II. Privilege of Vendor, see PRIVILEGE. III. Rights OF Pdrciia.sek. 1. Delegation of Price. 2. The vendor of real property has a right to Bue the purchaser, notwithstaniling that by the deed of wale the price was delegated to a third party and the deed registered, so long as there is no express acceptance of the delegation. Mal- leite et al. v. Budon, 21 L. C. J. 199, S. C. 1877. III. Rights op Purchaser. 3. The remedy of a purchaser of real estate in case of deficiency of quantity in the land sold is not in damages, but to claim either a diminu- tion of the price or the revocation of the sale. • 21 L. C. J. 95, S. C Dmitney v. ]i nyere et al., 1877; 1602 C.C. VENUE— /Sfee ACTION, Right of. I. On Bills and Notes, see BILLS OF EX- CHANGE. VERDICT— fifee CRIMINAL LAW. I. Motion to Set Aside. 4. A verdict for damages for a railway acci- dent cannot be set aside because the judge in determining the questions to be submitted to the jury !iiade no reference to the contributory negligence of the person killed, the question of the in-gligcnee of the plaintiil impliedly includ ing that of contributory negligence. Grand Trunk Railway Co. & Godbout, 6 Q. L. R. 63, Q. B. 1877. VOUCHERS. VESSELS. I. Liability for Repairs CHANT SHIPPING. II. Lien on see PRIVILEGE Equipeur. to, 740 see MER- op Dernier VETERINARY SURGEON. I. Damages Caused by Acting as, see DAM- AGES. VICE REDHIBITOIRE-See SALE, Wauranty, and action, Reuhibi- TOUY. VIEWS-See SERVITUDES. VIS MAJOR— &e FORCE MA- JEURE. VOID AND VOIDABLE. I. Difference Between, see SEQUESTRA- TION, Action bySkqcestre. VOL— See LARCENY, THEFT. VOLUNTARY SERVICES. I. Right to Compensation for, see ACTION Quantum Meruit. VOLUNTEERS. I. Rights and Liabilities of, see MILITIA LAW. VOTING. I. Under Temperance Act, see TEMPER- ANCE ACT. VOUCHERS. I. With Accounts, see ACCOUNTS. 741 WAIVER. WAIVER. 742 SUMMARY OF TITLES. IE- See SALE, CION, IlEDHIBI- WAOES 741 WAIVKR 741 W AIIUKNS 743 WARHHOUSKMHM 743 WAKKHUrSE RliCEIPT 744 WAHIiANlT 744 WATER COURSES 745 WEIGHTS AND MEASUFiES 745 WflARVES 745 WIDOWS 745 WIFE 746 WILLS 745 WINTER ROADS 750 WITNESSES 750 WOMEN 761 WOOD 751 WORK AND LABOR 751 WORKMEN 751 WRIT 751 r III II r, see TEMPER- WAGES. I. Action for Wage^ Due to Minor Son BY Fatukr, .vce ACTION II. Ok Master and Crew of Vessel, see MERCHANT SHIPPING. III. Of Persons Working for the Qi'Ehec Government at so mich a day not Seizaule, see EXECUTION, Exemptions. IV. Privilege for, sm PRIVILEGE. V. Right of Action for, see ACTION. WAIVER. I. Of Conditions in Inslhance Policy, see INSURANCE. II. Of Damages fob False Arrest. III. What is. II. Of Damages for False Arrest. 1 . Where defendant having been arrested on a capias settled the matter witiiout reserve on ex- phmation, having never been imprisoned — Held, that tlie court would readilv presume a waiver of any claim for damages. liapierre& GagnonA L. N.32, Q. B. 1877. III. What la. 2. The silence of an insurance company with regard to conditions of a policy \vliich have not been adhered to after a hre, does not amount to a v^aiver of those conditions. Whyte & The Westerti Assurance Co., 22 L. C. J. 215, P. C. 1875. 3. Where secondary evidence is a. of Ijaeal, CImmbbj & Jac IiuihIm (if I'liik, Tl L. C, J. RECEirT. OP COMI'ANY. una IN I'ossKssioN. UF Co.Ml'ANV. ranted witlioiit nu- Hi-erctiuy «'• u coni- warolicmseiiH'M, are 1 L. N. 101, &22 j.s IS PossEtisioy. given by a ware- in qufflioii lire not 1 vuiii. fVifliamson \. B. 1877. rollowin;^ form is a t a mere delivery & Co., on storn)»e lu\vini» mercliandize, nu No. 1 Clyde I'ig 'fling of iiavij^ation. der of til is receipt i. (Signed), 1 L. N. 100, & 22 tlie parties signing pail! vendors of tlie I it was not a ware- lliey were not ware- der of such receipt such warehotipe re- liy endorsement aa bt contracted at the pledgee having no nut authorized to cnowleilge being ou it. lb. an obligation con- nade to cover future itedutss. lb. See SALE. )TE, see BILLS OP . IV. Ok Transfer, see SURETYSHIP. I. CoNTINl'INO. 27. An order to "give bearer wliat he wants " dofu not contain a conlinning guaranty. La- croix A Jiutviir, 21 L. C. J. ;i27, Q. U. lH77. II. Ekkkct of. 2H. A sale of timber limits contained a clause thai it was made subject to the usual condition that it was not to interlere with limit.t granted or to lie renewed in virtue of ngulationH, which stipulation was well kiiowji to the piinduiser. J"he liiiiitH did in fact interlere with anterior grant.'---//(7 and the minor are the residuary Ie;:atees of tlie testatrix, and that tlie annuitantM are all dead. The words ol the will are explicit : — ■' tlie share of each cliild to lie |iaid or Bswiijiied to him or her on his or her atlaiiiiii); tlieiifie of 21 years." What is asked for is not tiie account of the minor, hut ol t.'ie piaintitis who aie now majors. It would he unreason- alile to reiiuire the piaintitis to wait till the minor is u iiiajor. We here apply the ordinary rule which entitles each minor to his porlhui on reailiiii^' the ope of majority. An account is ordeied. Devine & Griffin, S. C. 1877. II. 1!y. .'!] . Jii.tniie Pcrson.i. — In a contest overa will — Jle/il, null, as the lestiilor was at the lime ol makiiif: it sutleriii}; from delirium tremens an(l congesi ion ol the hrain. Vhaplvan & Lhaiileuu, 1 I . N.'I73, y. U. 1«7«. III. Interpbictation ok. yi. In an action concerning a succession — Hi'ld, that the desiL'tiation of the .suhnlitii^K by the wurds, '' E>iJ'iiii/.i lU'.i <51,on the ground of Irainiulent suggestion and threats on the part of the liusband, the delendant. The delendant denied these allegations. Tlieprool wa.'j that the will was made in a curious way, that the delendant was continually urging his wiliu to make a will. The testatrix declared so herself, and havingasked lor the meansof niakinga will witnesses were got into the house on a kind of false pretence. The testatrix dictateii a will, but the witnes.ses did not sign it in her presence. Nevertheless they got a declaration in it from her that she was obsedee, tormented by her husband to make a will in his favor disinherit- ing her children. By that will she lell all her property to her children, subject only to a lite enjoyment of part ol it in lavor ol the' husband. The will attacked was made live days afterwards before notaries, and lelt the husband everything, naming him sole executor. One of the notaries deposed that alter she had executed it she ex- claimed : " Now the ra.-cals are happy." Alenaces by the husband were also proved, and there was prool also that the testatrix wislied to change the second will, but her husband put her oil', and said the next day would do. Siie died, liowever, the next morning. — Ileld, to be proved that the last will was not in accordance with the actual rolonli o\' \.\\e testatrix, and will set aside. Uorion v. Uorion, 7 H. L. 402, 6. C. 1875, & 9 it. L. 97, Q. B. V. Pkesorii'tion ok. .■!(!. Wills are not prescrilied by ten years bv t( e, but under Art. 22.W ol the Civil Code, liut by iliirly years under Art. 2242. JJorioii ct JJurion, 7 K. L. 402, S. C. 1875. VI. Reading ok. 37. PlaintifF's mother by lier will of Novem- ber, 1848, bequeathed al flier property ol every kind to iier husband, subject to the express charge and condition that lie should not diopo.-e * Ccnflrmed in Appeal Sept. 20, 1882. ;. 748 'IhIi her pro|)erty to (l('lit»< tlitiii ilione of re veUe.i : ]>iii/.i. " J cxre/i/e irpendant de cclle di.ijio.sil'ion " i/eneni/): men ierren ile La Tortne.ti/m'e.s ilan.i " la pitroisne de ,Sl. I'ltillipe el tie 67. Constant. " Jr lij/ne cex terres >l mon fil.i nlnd Cliarlr.i " Aljral. • • • J/„/.v ,„,„j y,7., ,4,j^ ,/g,.j,,j " done /aire loux ses efiirls pour conneruer celle " proprie/v, anUliorer lex diffirenlex ierre.i quelle "ren/crnte, et lex tnmmielire pins tard a sex " enfanlx. S'il n'avait pug d'enf'unts je lui " coiixeille de leyuer eelie propriety d nn dex " enfantx males de sex frires Adotphe on lier- " nanl. Sicesderniers naeaienl pas d'enf'anix " males it c/ioisirait alors par mi lex enfantx de " sex stenrx un (pirnon qull instituerait son " hiritier a la condition que ce dernier prenne " le uom de I'insonneault, qu'il lui suffise dans " le clioix (fu'ilfcra d'un hcritier de bieu rem- " plir mes intentions qui sont de conseroer pour " tou/ours intacte dans lafamille cetteproprieU WITNESSES. 780 " il laiiudle je snis atlaeliti pour les raisons ri- •' desxnx dMin^i." Hv another article it wati said :— " ,V(,/i /ih a'ln^ I'harlis Alfred parla- " ijeni I'lialimenI arer sex x(cnrx el'fri'ris ilans '• liiux mrx aiitrex bieiix ni xiix ile nia priipriiti* ' il La Tortur ipie Je lui Ih/iie punr lex ranxes " ri-dexxnx nienliiinni'es." Ijv a -econd codicil It was said :— •' // xrra loisiiile ,). monJiUatnt " C'/iarlex All) I'd de tranxiniltrc mon'dnmiiine " d La TortUf ei-ih'xxns menlioiini> drelui d,' ses " enfanlx qn'il en juijera leplux di(/ne."~/l,ld, that by thesi' claii-e's or dispositions a siib-li- liilKin was created, and the petition !iir acnnuor was granted. Drummimd exp.,:\ L. N. IM, S. C. Isi.so. WINTEI! ROADS. PUUAIIONIS, LtABII.lTV OK. WITNESSES. I. AtTOUNKVS ad LiTKM Ca.N.VOT III.' »M ATruRNKV.S AD LITHM. ' * J I. CoMI'KTKNCV OK. HI. IVVAMI.VATION OK. IV, (illl.TV OK CoNTKMfT. V Nkki. not ANswiin QuESTio.Vd Tendi.vo TO LllLMlNATK rilEM, V'l, Un.E Against. II. Co.Ml'ETENX'Y OF. .'i'J. One endorser of a note or bill is compe- tent as a witness against an .titer, the maker or another end.nvser. MeL,;„l \, Eaxlern Town- x/iips Hank, 2 L. N. 2:i'J, Q. ]{. Wi. III. EXA.VCI.VATION OK. 40. An in.solvenl i.s not bound to an.»wer a ouestion which may tend I,, criminate hini lieaadry in re. & Wilkes, 21 L. C. J. 11»G, S C lfi77. IV. Gtrii.TY OF Contempt. 41. A wiine.ss neglecting to appear b,^r)re an accountant, appointed by thecoiirt, in obedience loasiibpiena duly served on him, is guilty of contempt. Preeoxtk Gautkier,tA L. C. J, 32:! b. C. l,""!). ' V. Nkki) not Answeii Questions Tendino TO Litl.MlNATE THEM. 42. A defendant sued for penalties under ,S7 Vic cap. y IS nol obliged to answer cpiestions tending to criiiiinate him. Lanalois v. Valin G Q. L. It. 240, S. C. 1880. ' VI. Rli.e Against. 4."}. A witness who has failed to appear can- not be condemned to a tine on motion to that ellect .served upon hiui, but only on service of a I ■■! 761 WllIT. WRIT. 7B2 rule upon him.* Gondton v. Levis & Kennebec 11. li., 4 y. L. U. 382, S. C. 1H78. WOMEN. I. AcTioK AoAiNST, ,i«e ACTfON. II. ArTMoitiZATioN OK, .«cr MAlilUAOK. III. Kuniis OK, K,'e MAKKIAGli;, MAR- IlIAGE CUNTUACTS. WOOD. I. Sale ok, see SALE en bloc. WOliK AND LABOK. I. Hike ok, see IIIKE. WOKKMEN. I. Act to Secure the Payment of, see Q. 44- 45 Vic. cup. 17. II. Privii.koe ok, s«y! PRIVILEGE. III. Seizike ok Wages ok, see Q. 44-45 Vic. cup. 18. WEIT. I. Description of Parties in, see PROCE- DURE. • .Stniblf, that tlie motion for a rule must also be served, except wlieu made on the return day ot aeubpcsna. II Of Error, «e< CRIMINAL LAW. III. Ok Po.ssehsion, see possession. IV. Ok Pkoiiiiiition. V. Ok Si'm.monh. VI. Validity of. IV. Of Prohibition. 44. A writ of proliibition will lie to prevent the 8ecretury-treumirer ol u county t'nmi pro- ceeiling to u Hule of lunii lor school tuxes pre- IciKJed to be due.* Mon/an & Coli, 3 L. N. 274, (j. U, 18H0. 45. And ttlso to prevent a municipality from jiruceedini; with the opening of a street. 'Mayor .f- C'litnicil of' Iberville & Junes, 3 L. N. 277, Q. U. 1880. V. Ok Summons. 46. Dehnj.i o».— Thedelay of one intermediate day provided by the Code of Procedure t on ^erviceo^sumlnonH under tlie Lessor and Lessee Act nlu^t be of one juridical day, and therefore a service made on the 24th Decenilier of a writ returnable on the 27th, tlie two inter- mediate duys being ChristmuB and Sunday, was lield insutlicienL MetayHr dit St. Uiige v. Laricketihe, 21 L. C. J. 27, S. C. 1876. VI. Validity op. 47. An error in the date of a writ is not fatal. Nohm V. Dastotis, 4 Q. L. R. 335, S. C. R. 1878. 48. And a c|ueRtion as to whether the deputy proliionotary is or is not of age cannot be raised incidentally so as to invalidate a writ signed by liim. lb. * Affirmed In Supreme Court. t The delay upon aummous is only cue intermediate day, etc. C. C.P.sao. f! i:i ERRATA ET ADDENDA, Hlmhor Hotel Co. it- Lewis, p. 172, art. 162, eliould have been noted as reversed in Appeal (see 4 L. N. 331). I'udney & (Jliartrand, p. 24,'f, art. 54, conlirnied in Appeal. 762 iL LAW. iSKSSION. II lie to prevent utility (hiiii pro- iliooi tiixoH pre- k Vote, 3 L. N. unicipality from iiKtreet. Mnyor 8L. N. 277, Q. Dneinterinediate Proufilure t on jssor and Lessee ,y, and tlierelbre Deci'iiil>er of a the two inter- ind Sunday, was it St. Unae v. C. 1876. writ is not fatal. ;. 335, S. C. K. ?ther the deputy janiiot be raised a writ signed by one intermedlit« 768 rsed in Appeal 754 TABLE OF CASES. A Abbott I), Eraser AbUilt ('. Macdonald AbruliaiiiH r. Ke}:ina Adam I). Flande's " V. Mercier Adams i\ Hrooks " I'. Mcfiilyre Ajkenh V. Holtoii Aitkin V. National Liaurance Aikin v. Hood Aicork r. Howie Alexaniler i'. 'J'aylor Allair v. Lv>i .Syndics, etc, oiSt. Ours Allaire r. Small wood Allan I'. Belleisie " V. Cross " V. McLa^jan " V. W( Kid ward Allard V. Qiiiiitiil Alloway r. Saunders Ainhrois r. Malleval Amiot V. Tremblay Amos t). Moms Anctil v. Dedu'ne Anderson v. Brusgaard " V, Oervais " V. Sanborn Andrews i'. Holton Angers v. Trndel Angus V. Uorrowman " V. Montreal, Portland Ansell I'. Hank of Toronto Ansel! i'. Simpson " V. Thayer Antaya i\ Poiilet Aruhambault exp. " V. Beaudry " V. Belanger " V, Bourgeault PAOK 71, "(i 216,217, 220 2!)5 12 2((H 48, 534, C23, C'U Co. 402 20M 24 117 of the Parisli 154 418,574 350 144 34, 250 144, 724 4(>1 l'J!» 13!) 260, .350, 498, 050 159, 384 309 81, 20G 389 581 17, 205 143 74, 378, G07, 093 & B. Railway 194,371, 612,043 99, 248 671 651, 683 139 203, 348, 474 619 394, 659 578 I'AOK Archambaull w. Citizens Insurance Co. ,124, 325,413,519 " I'. City of Montreal 235,528 670 179, 626 411 210 68, 91, ISC, 203 .■i95 115, 426, 575 48 733 26, 351 Archer i\ " V. V. ('ompte r. Daiisereaii t'. (lalarneau !'• Pangiiian r. Westcott BoisMonauit Lortie Arciiibald c Brown Aressc V. Diibreuil Armitage v. Evans Armstrong v. Dolinelie " V. Pangborn Arpin v. Dixon " I'. Laiiioureux " I'. Poiilin Arres v. Gardner Af^till v. Hal lee " Atalava " The " Attila" The Attorney Genei-al v. City of Montreal 563 162 555 259,263,417 110, :tH2 357, 490 493 3;i7 311,484,485 Aiibert v. Dumont Audette v. Bank of .Montreal •' V. Beaudette Auge V. Mayrand Auger V. Oilnior " »", O'Meara Auld ' .'".aser Aussaii V. Vandal Aylmer v. Maher Ayotte V. Duhaine " V, Laijace 36, 62, 445 V. Cote 35, 455, 458 V. Middleniiss 16, 255 V. Montreal City Passenger Railway " 710 V. Murray 60, 72, 467 I'. Queen Ins. Co. 37, 454 677 110, 3M7 137 131 671 260 398 601 61, 421 7 84 B Babv V. Boiirget Bachand y. Bisson Bach law (7. Cooper Badeau v. McNichols Bailiie w. Uesmarteuu " t>. Provincial Insurance Co. Bain «. Regina Bain v. Whyte Baker v. Ciaves " I'. Cie.'dePret, &c. " y. Welch Baldwin V. Fair Bank of British North America v. Bureau Bank of Commerce v. Brown 585, 587, Bank of Montreal «. Audette 110, 358, 85, 488, 401, 430, 280. 205, 31, 602 613 489 307 6h:i 434 222 434 295 679 167 .•{'.IT 615 622 387 Bank of Montreal v. Geddes 103, .387 " V. McLachlan ILS " V. Thompson 171 Bank of Toronto B. Ansell 99 Bank of Toronto v. European Assurance Socie'v 248,400 " V. Girard 98, 183 " V. Hood 189 " V. Perkins .356, 497 Bannatyne v. Canada Paper Co. 133, 243 Baptist V. Smith 736 Barbeau v. Larochelle 377 Biiriieau i'. Levy 3fj5 Baird i>. Dionne 306, 589 Barlow v. O'Halloran 86, 618 755 TAIILE OV CASEH. 756 ( PAOK KiiriK's r. llnincHu JHK Hiint'ilc c. l'iiir V, Bissoiinotte 572, 5'J5 r. BrosHi-au 300 I'. Brown 343, 345 t'. Cily of Montreal 5'J, 522 V. Grant (123 V. LaHeur 401,(100 f. Lareau 178,312 V. Les Cnrp, etc., oi" Mont- real 180, 549 r. Holland 442 744 ,,.., 392 t'. Farmers Insurance Co. 207, 618 V. Les Cure, etc. ol'St. Enfant Jesus 151. V. Boiirl.aiiit 345, 512 V. Lalielle (190 Beanrejiard i'. Dufour 429 Beausol'.'il e. Buurfr: r. Meier 83 Beli-le V. I'ejjerin 561 " r. Perron 59 r. Slater 134,612 Ueliveau r. liarllie 516 " r. Dnchesneau 357, 516 " r. 'I'alliot (-92 Bell r. Burlanil-Desbarats Co. 464 " V. ''iirporalion of Qi. Farmer Bedard v. Lebrun 456,459,574 123, 313, 325 20, 356, 617 I'. Latulip lippe net v. Quesii V. (ioisvert " t). Carrier " i>. Hogan " t'. Pelletier Berthe v. Regina Berthelot v. Burroughs " I'. Thcoret Bertrand v. Chouiiiard " I'. Dee.eiles " I'. Gault " V. Gnaedinger Bertrand y. Pepin 237, 594 201,335 414,600 22, 440 692 111 204, 669 51,456 426, 621 139 350 449 599 47, 379 (100 228, 712 577, 744 137 263, 488 583, 584 675, 705 588 439, 464 246 19 289 91,550 431,629 87 205 335, 344 90 271,552 (170 239 219 614 731 612 113.386 34 3,3, 108 88, 738 ! i 756 7^7 TAni.E OF CAHEH. 58 :iigc Co. I'AOE :m 4(i, 12a, 7!6 .'iSH (;:i2 :
    .')(l, CpOI ;12(), KiO H3 59 134, 612 516 357, 516 »=92 464 660 237, 721 5'.t4 6SH 201,335 414,600 22, 440 G02 111 38, 204, 669 51,456 64, 210, 426, 021 139 350 la 449 599 47, 379 600 228, 712 577, 744 137 26:!, 488 568, 5s:i, 584 675, 706 588 439, 464 246 19 289 91,550 431,029 87 206 335, 344 90 271,552 670 239 219 614 731 612 113, :H86 34 33,108 88, 738 I>A(1K IliTlriiiil (• r l'.>iiliot Kulx-rt 4!>2, 5i; 1,621 2m:i, :i(H JJi'HHciiu'r r. Mflitiicnn 310, 014 f. |)('plH)>" 27 Del ii II 111- r. CliiirlcliiiiH 604,052 „ MrMilliiii :iio liickfll t<. Uit'liaril 02H Hi( kcrilike '. Miirriiy 45 Bii'iivfim D. K.iHU'rii TowDKliipa IiiHuruiiie riiliy r. I,c|)ftj.'(' liiNHuii r. Hiii^liuiicl " r. Citv III Montreal " I'. IMiiliciii " r. 'rriiili'iiii UiMHdiietle r. ilciiinlry " r. Morin " r. Kt'jriiiii lilack 1', Nalloiiiil IiiHiiruncc Co " I'. UIkmIi'n Uliij;iliiii r. Lflicl Kliiiklock r. Miioliill' Hliiiii r. Viiiitriii lilaiN V. (ili'iiHiiii " I'. LcHniiiintli Jllukc I'.Usi.'ll Blitiicliaril r. liiiiimrclio " I'. Liiim " r. 'I'liiToiix BlHiiuliet r. (iiiiiy " Sarjit'iiiit HIcn 1). St. Jcuii Hk'iiu 1: Ki'friiiH lilinn V. MujjiHi rules Court of County of Broiiie BlooinfieM V. BriHjke 423, 700 Blouiii I'. Boucliurd 179, 379 " V. Doiiiro 322 " t\ Laii>.'elier 209,5K4, 672 Board o( Temporalities v. Doliie, 38, 72, 208, ;57 1,375, 448, 744 13,415 .•(2 oi;t 306, 523. 744 555, 6.(1 H4 572, 51(5 205, 5.5H 210,227 416, 744 551 OH 4 lO'.l 0(f;t 705 078 227 012,017 150, 200, 430 19, 652 298 5H 5H9 217 431 Hoiicliaril r. Toiiriijny lloiiclier r. Itonnut 90, 334 HdiiL'ie r. Niiriiiandeaii 8H HdiiIi' r. l.aii^jis 75(1 Hdiik'rlHHe r. H(4iert 614 Hoiilton /•. Court Mc'.int Riiyal 100,195 Boura.xi^u r. Ucffina 310 " r. Koy 710, 717 Kourliault v. Mcaiipr^ 345, 512 IJdiir^reaii r. HinHHard 499 Bourgi'ttiiil i>. Arrliaiiibault 57H " r. Haiiiel 358,002 1'. Shaw 320 Bourgoin v. ItiMiiiHoieil 207 V. Maihiot ^ 370, 027 " V. Montreal Ottawa and Western llailway 37, 174, 194, 320, 449,481,617,020,039, 041 " I'. Plante 17 Bourbeau i>. Cartier 512 Hourk r. Seweil 597, 081 Hoiirke r. Lanj^lois 681 Bourret i\ Hoiine " V. Ilurlubuise 133 Bou.'^iiet ('.Brown 516,056 " I'. HouBf.uau 9,515,516 Bouthi'lier t). Cairns 456 " V. Hart 547 " V. Ottawa Agricultu'-al Insur- ance Co. 57 Bowdon I'. Hart 240,470 Bowen V. Rnbinson 199 Bowie ti. Whyte 391 Boyer v. l.)u|>errault 729 ■' V. Irwin 54 " V. Mclver 440, 403 Bovnton v. Grose 393 Hradlord i'. Driscoll 289 Bradley r. Logan 617 Hrais i-. Hacette 674 Hramley r. Mechanics' Bank 51 , 110 Branciiaiid v. Lel'ebvre 360, 049, 0H7 Bra.ss&rd v. Langevin 00 " V. Lepage llH V. O'l-'arrell 70, 71, 104 Brault V. Lrault 207 " V. Marsolais 245 Breakey v. Carter 78, 373, 736 Biennaii f. McAnnally 491,589 " V. VVuldron 202, 027 Brewis y. Stewart 120 Brewster v. C-. T. R. Co. 022, 088 f. Lamb 71, 72 Rriilgpwater The 4S5 Brieii v. Fausse 056 Hrigiiain v. Hall 202 Hrilloii V. (ringrfts 824 lirisbin r. Cainpeau 188,442 Brissette v. Sylvestre 288 British American Land Co. v. Cross 411 .♦ fS* 759 TABLE OF CASES. 7(50 - - t , ,1 British Aiiiprican Laml Co. r. Laverdit-re Jiroclm V. r)ii(|H('lte Broukvilleit OitawiiKaihvav Co. v. Fo.-'ter 3Ht», Brodeur v. Mavais Brodv V. ]{ei)dall Brooke v. Blooinfield Brooks V. Adaiii.s Brossard v. BtTj^eron " V. Bourgeau " t'. Langevin V. O'Farrcll BroHseau v. Beaiidry " V. Crevier " V. Homier " P. Panc't Brouillard v. Gunn " V. Laiigelicr Brown V. Arciiibald " i». Bank of Commerce " V. Beaudry " V. Bousquet " t-. Darling 160, 308, 324, 476, 600, 603, " I'. Dorion " V. Ker " V. Mayor of Montreal " V. MullJn " V. Perkins Browne v. Pinsonneault Browning '•. Vi,ssiere Brownrigg v. Tutls Bruce v. Dudevoir 423, 60, 298, 303, 630, 692, 585, 587, 343, 616, 48, 64, 201, 14 22, •A OK 6Stl 69 394 207 461 700 12 246 499 654 656 300 135 717 697 64H 471 48 622 315 656 604 42 168 328 383 ,15 467 675 730 613 PAGE 136 489 205 01, 281,282,293,302 57 18,178,417,490 650 Brnckliert r. Malier BrtiMcau c. liiirnes " ('. (lagnon " v. Mas.se " ?'. McCJaU'rey Brunelle v. Utickiey " r. Lafleiir Brunei v. Corporation of Village of Cote St. Louis 536 " V. Pinsonneault 600 " V. Sauniure 263 " V. Wilson (;^8 Brusjaard v. Anderson 81, 206 Bruyere v. Doutiiey 28, 739 Bryant i\ Fitzgerald 576 Buckley v. Brunelle 18, 178, 417, 490 Budden i'. Knight 631 Buhner «. DuCresne 647, 738 " V. Lacroix 746 Burch V. Carillon & Grenville Railway 614, 618, 633 Bureau v. Bank of B. N. A. 615 " V. Rous.sel 360, 651 Burke ii. Colfer gg Burland Desbarats Co. v. Bell 464 Burroughs v. Berthelot 614 " V. Malhiot 209 BuH'tall V. Stevenson 118 Bury e. Beique 108 " c. Hatchette 394 " V. M. 0. & 0. Railway 29 Bussei;p. ]92 Butters v. Pierce 6, 442 c li Cable V. Stewart 427, 654 Cadieux exp. i(;i " V. Cadieux 591, 619 " Canadian Mutual Fire Insurance Co. 86 Caffrey v. Hawkes 134 Cahill V. Hatcliette 500 Caiile i^ Rheaume 41)7 Cairn.s v. Bouthillier 4,'i(; Caliiwoll V. Macf'arlane 387, 391 Callahan v. Corporation of St. Gabriel West 530 " V. Gauthier 615 " V. Holton 534, 537 " v. Vincent 13, 79, IHl Calniel w City of Montreal 18,530,540 Campbell y. Chabot 122,474 "' V. FilioM (;o7 " I"- ImU'i- 174, 200 " r. Molsoii's Bank I'ji " V. H('eve.s 242 Campeau r. Brisbin 188, 442 Canada Building Sfx^icty r. Lii Banqne Nalioniile 111!), 1!)6, 260 " Copper and Snlphnr Co. r. Hall 234 " Gniirantf-e Co. r. Dunniiiun Typo Founding ('o. "434, 659 " Mutual Building Society v. O'Brien 126, 606 Canada Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. San- boken 404 " Paper Co. v. Bannatyne 133, 245 " " " V. Gary 426, 440, 595 " Shipping Co. V. Hudon Cotton Co. 46 " " " e. Leaf 144 " " V. Wilson 483 " Steel Co. I'. Chinic 171, 552 Canadian Meat and Produce Co.' v. Wise- man 69 " Mutual Insurance Co. v. Beau- soleil 403 " Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ca- dieux 86 " Mutual Insurance Co. «. Kero- ark 409 "■ Mutual Insurance Co. i'. Dono- van 406, 743 " Navigation Co. u. McConkey 143,622 Canaiiienne, The 4;j;{ Canncn «. Fournier 66, 200 Cantin v. Corporation of St. Martin 538 Cantwell v. Cforporation of Chateauguav 521, 531 " V. Madden 322 Cardinal v. Dominion Fire Insurance Co. 4,)5 Carey v. Canada Paper Co. 426, 440, 59a 7(50 I'AOE lar, 489 205 il, 281, 282, 293,302 57 18, 178,417,490 tiSO V^iilage of Cote 536 600 263 (;^8 81, 206 28, 739 576 18, 178, 417, 490 631 647, 738 746 nville Railway 614, 618, 033 615 ell 360, 651 86 464 614 209 118 108 394 29 192 6,442 nee Co. V. San- 404 latyne 133, 215 426, 440, 595 Ion Cotton Co. 40 r 144 3011 483 171, 552 i Co; ti. Wise- 69 Co. t!. Beau- 403 5 Co. V. Ca- 86 Co. y. Kero- 409 Co. V. Dono- 406, 743 IcCohkey 143, 622 4;i3 66, 200 Miirtin 538 Clmteaiignav 521, 531 322 re Insurance 405 426, 440, 69a 761 Carillon u. Caron i\ Relanger '* r. Cloutier " !'. Soucv Carj)enter r. bery V. Srnilev TABLE OP CASES. Carrenii Carrier Car.«lake Carter PAGE Grenville Railway & Burch 614, 618, 633 296 600 589,618 367, 652, 676 597, 623 201 271,552 259 199 152, 589, 622 81,310 112 78, 373, 736 69, 202, 592 426, 654 68 V. RIcGinnis V. Bcrnier V. Bducher V. Cote V. Les Cure, etc. V. Plante V. Wyatt V. IJreaky V. Ford V. Holiiie.s V. Lalanne & Moiaon v. Holmes 72, 90, 141 312, 423,425,654,695 Cartier v. Bourbeau " V. Germain " I'- National Insurance Co Ca.Ty I.. Shaw Cassant v. Catellier " V. Hoaton Cassidy V. Cuddy " V. Trust & Loan Co. Cassils V. Crawford 512 200. 614 32, 108 427, 592 84 84 33, 108 627 595 180,427,58.3, 012 24,619 35, 547, 673 84 584 467 592 72, 73, 241, 548 291 122, 474 425 V. Fair I'. Holme Catafard «. Clement Catellier v. Cassant Caty V. Court " V. Marchand Cauohon v. Lawlor Caverhilit). Robillard Canter v. Corporation of Chatliatn t^entral Vermont Railway v. Paquette Cliabot V. Campbell ^'"'' '""^'' Chadwick u. Major Cliagnon y. (Jiroux Chalifoux V. Belanger Chaloult II. Begin Chalut V. VaTade Champagne v. Belanger " V. Griveau & Boisjoli V. Lanthieux " V. Lapierre Uiante loup v. Dominion Oil Cloth Co. thapdelame w. Chevallier Chapleau v. Chapleau Chapman v. Lancashire Insurance Co ' V. Larin tiiarbonneau v. Charbonneau V. Corbeil V. Loyseau Charest Charlebois 619 632 613 180 625 30, 583 125 326 579 718 . 408 183 317 84 61,365 V. Veilieux !(;•> V. Bethiine 604, 652 V. Charlebois goy " V. La Societe de Construction 647 _, ''■ Lemaire f,ui Chartrand exp. " V. Lambert 059 '' «>• ^*/'*J'^>'- 95, 96, (i2S '■• ' '"'ney 2r! Chaste _ „.Pe||etier 28,657,676 ^.^liauHse V. Larose 251 Chauveau v. Evaiia 379 Chayeri". Crevier Chenard i\ Lalilierte Cherrier v. Torcapei Chester in re Ciievaiier i'. Chapdelaine " V. Cuvillier Clievagny v. City of Montreal Chevrier v. National Insurance Co. Chicoine 1: Khicard Chinic ('. Canada Steel Co. Choquet v. Hart Choren v. Grant Chouinard v. Bertrand " I'. Lafond " V. Begin a Cliretien v. Smith Christie r. Hamilton y. Hills Christin v. Valois Cimon y. Perratilt 1; V. Tarte w. Tlioiiipaon Cinq Mars y. Ga- Citizens Insuran - 0. v 7G2 PAGE 31,693 24, 108 613 384 573 7, 76, 329 266 172.313 17, (;()3 171, 5.-.2 430 659 612 728 227 11,487 676, 698 295 173,307,308,314, 619 279, 292 293, 295, 430 118 209, ,3S6, 466 Arcliaiiibanlt 324, 32.5, 41.!, 519 V. Grand Tnuik Railway Co. 63, 400 y. LatleiiV 404 y. Lajoie ."ig y. Paquet 404 y. Rawliiigs 47 186,401,404 V- Rolland 204 V. Ru.-^s 587 528 37,448 City E.xpropriations Ca=es in re " ofFretfericton y. The Queen '^CityofManitowac,"The City of Montreal v. Archambault " V. Attorney General 36, " « ..Bayli« "'''*" V. Beaudry V. Bisson V. Calmel V. Chevagny V. Corbeil V. Cox V. Demers V. Devlin V. Dubuc V. Diigdale t'. Forte y. Fraser V. Green " V. Grenier " V. Guillaume te 611 235, 628 18,417 59 306, 744 18, 540 266 529 669 326, 744 70,71, 635 80 506, 626 629 513 491, 530,597 249, 529, 601 2.36,529,621 y. Guy 263,313,539,605, 662 V. Joseph V. l^arose y. Leve.sque V. Luokhuret «'. Mallette y. McEachern V. Molson y. Perkins V. Itichelieu t'. itiojiel y. Slate y. Tniteau t'. Wilson 711 236, 629 525 235, 528 36, 372, 5,33 513 427. 524 36, 418, 452 525 2.36, 528 531, 591 536 417 ii ■i '1! '■« 7b'3 TAllI.K OF CASES. 7< r. I Flint .VJO f. K.'llv 'ilM,:):!!" " r, ril..;i t'.l.! r. i'..itnis ;!7. \^^, ir.>, ivii ('li\rk r. Kxcliuii);i> Hunk 171. .UIS. :!:is " I', liiirlio (iV.'l riiixlon r. M' "atlVov .'m:!, :!i;:> Cliivi's c. Hiilxor " l!S(l, 'ill.", rit'lin-nl r. Ciitafiinl 'M, .MT. i'm.'I Clciiit'iit r. (imvi'l llTi. i:!'.t r. Ileiilli :!:i(l, i:!ll r. ll.'i-onx .11, ;i.l.!, I.IS " r. LorMiii;or Hi.!, .'">.Vt r, Oiikcs :il(i,ISS Cliuilior I". Ciirou ti(ll) r. II wot (11. "> " r. Liiiiiorri' .'!- riiini(> I'. l.iiilinu'iMir WiS, ".'!'> (Vi.iilv r. l''i'asi'r (111 Ooflinino r. I'liaiuMtf 31.'!, .'■)S() (\>|i)>ini: '■ Marshall (ill r.iin.l.'l r. (iilhort SS. .'llll C.l.'brook IJolliii!; Mills r. (Mivt'i- 511, T.ls (\ili;'r c. Itiwko St! C'.illi'lti' r. Vaillaiuourt 'UK', Com. Mniiial Itiiihiing Society r.'Melver 'JO.'i. (ISO Coniniissioner.s of Q.M. O. ,t O. U. U. r. O'Neil ■:.\,:v>i " St. Louis School r. Delisle Kl.'i " ConiMioijore,'' The Is:! Cie. 'le (.'heinin ile Fer do IjanrentidcH i\ (^or|Hinitinn ot St. Lin IS'2 " " " Fere. Tiernttii ;)70 " " " For (le LaiirentitJes r. (iaiithier '.I.'), (iJ,"), G2S " V. La Corpoiatiiiii lie Si. Lin 1S2 " Siiii Fst c. Ore- l-ussa M, .111 " lie Fonilerie r. Mulliolluii.l :i'2, lOH " lies Mouliii.s lie Pierreville r. I^es Cure, etc., of St. Thomas l.'i'J " do Pret, etc. r. Haker '20.'), (iiH " •• " c. ('arand (110. (ISS " " " V. .leannotte M'.t, (ll.S roinpte I'. Archamliault HTll Connollv ('. Itoriie .'ITS V. Mnrphy .ST!). ;!!t7 " r. Provincial Insurance Co. 3L!, lO:! Consolidated Hank r- Davidaoi] '''0, iilt"). i')07 Constant r. Pacaud (iril Converse I". Provincial Insurance Co. -lOS Convev f. Henoiif .'isil " " (■ Smiley 597, (i2:i Coinvay r. (lilieaii G2G Cooev fi-p. i\ Muiiicipalitv of Hronie 117, 422, 44:i, 722 Cook r. Hart. 554 Coolcv c. Dominion liuilding Society 10!», 115,121 Cooney i\ .Mullins 2(11) Cooper r. Hachhiw 4Si) " V. Mn.vwell OSH « Cote V. R'- Co(|uereau r. Cramp Corl 'il ('. Charbonneau I'. City of Montreal 4iy 5S, .'1114 ,^4 629 I'AllH Ci)rlK>ille ('. Vilipny 1154 " r. ('orporalion of St. .lean Hiiptiste :i,5, 524 Corisline r. Montreii! Citv Passeinier Railway ' 210 Cornell v. Rhiehard 558 Corri^an r. School Commissioners of Tewkesbiirv 1(15 Corporaliiiii (f Acton c. l''eltoii 412, 442, 511, (104 " " Ai''ji'iili'iiil r. .Sauve 722 " " ;\si'(itl r. Mailin 2.!5 " Hajrol r. .MeKvila 47'.), 5:tC " Hieiivillec. Oilli'spic 4:!0, 542 574 r. .Morisetle " 112.! I'. Na.leaii (12:{ " " Hrome r. Coviv 722 " Cliambly r. Yiile 122 " " Clia(eaiij;niiv r. Cantwell 52l,5:il " " Chatham r. Center 201 " " Comploii r. Ivisli'i'ii TiuvM- ship- Hank 111, 521 '' " Cole !!|. Pan! r. ('orpor- alioii of Verdun 525 " " I)niiiimond r. Corporation of St. (iiiillaiiiiie 470, 521, 5:!1, 500, (115 " " Driimmond |i. .Soiilli Fas(- erii Counties Uaihvav ;U7, (ii;i '* " Grantham r. C iiitiirp (10, 100, 111, 10(1. .5;i4 " " Iloehelav'a r. Liissier' 72 " " Hull r. .Marlin 111.5:14 " " Levis r. (Iriiiid Trunk Railwav ;i,s, 522 " " r.Meniiier ' (12 " " '• r. Roberire 5:!(1 " Missis,|uoi r. Hart 44:1.722 " " Moiilmoreiici i\ Simanl 5:!;i, :>:u. 5:17, (i:!0 " " I'arishof St. .lerome r. S.'oll 5:(8 « " Princeville r. Piuuuid (120, (121, (!22 " " Salaberrv r. Monlieal Codon'Co. ()2. ;!2S, 5S7, 500 " " Slaiilirid;:e r. Whilinan 2:i I,5:i0 " " St. Alexandre r. Mailloiix 5:!7 " " St. Chrislophe i\ lieandelle 528 " " Sl.Ciabriel West r. Callaiian 5:!0 " " St. (iabriel West r. Holton 2(! " " St. (lermain r. Rinjruet 525 " " St. (iiiilla me r. (lorpiira- tion of Dniinniund 470, 52 1, 5:)1, 500,(115 " " St. Jean Hiiiitiste i". Corbeil ;!5, 524 " " St. Jean Haptiste v. Rien- deiiii :!5 " " St. Jean Chrysostoine v. (iiroiLx 521 '• " St. Lin ('. Cie. deCheminde Fer lie Laurenlides 182 " " St, Martin r. (':tnlii-. 5:!8 " " St. Scholastiiiue c. (Sratton 200 " " St. Sauveur e. Retina 200,5:10 " Stoke L\ llolle G2, 522, 2:!5 7(14 r.MiK (i;VI of St. .Iciiii X>, ,V2t Uilv I'lisNciigcr 210 f.r.s lunissioncrH ol' Kir. ('Il<.ii W', 1 12, r. 1 1,(1114 I i\ SiuLvi'- "22 'liirliii 2'!,') loKvilii .|7!t, 5:!6 <. (lillosnic 4:i0. rivi, r,7 1 ". M.iriscito (12:! r. Nii.li'iiii ;ii r. (Viitcr 2111 '. Ivi.^li III 'I'mvii- iik lll,r.2t 'mil r. Oi)r|ii>i'- V'cnliiii ri2.') il i: ('i)r|)()r;iliim lilliiii'iic M'.), r.2i, r.iti, r.'.to, CI,'-, I I'. Sulilli I'.iisl- liitics Itiiiiwiiv Ml 7, fii:! I r. (' iiitiirp (id, 10!), Ill, l!)l!.r.:il 1 r. Lussior' 72 111 ill ni.r>:i4 (iiiiiiil Trunk llaihvuv :;m, .'■i22 I'liiiifr (i2 MJifrL'c rilili i r. Hart ■It.'l, 722 iioi r. Siiiiiii'il r.:!;i, cm. r>M, diio t. .Ici'ipiiic r. Scdit Ct'M ' r. riu'imil 020, 021, 022 r. Montreal \>. 02, :!2S, r.S7, fiDO r. Will I limn 2IU,ri.'iO Ire V. Miiillciiix ''hil pile /'. lii'ii.iclt'llc .')2.S Wcfilr.Ciillaiiiiii .OltO West (1. Ilolton 2(i n I'. Rinsriu't .V25 ■me r. Corpiini- iiiiiiiui)il47!>, .'■)2I, .'■.;! i,.'J!)o,(;ir. laptinte r. Corlieil ;ir), r.24 JaptiHte t'. Hieii- 115 ClirvMOstome v. 521 Die. lie (^lieiiiiniU' iaurciitiiieH 1H2 v. Ciiiitin 5;'.^< . .•->HKH. I'AIJK Laniliert 2.').') (,1'HHaiil 2.0) (Jraiiil Trunk 200,0(11,040 r. Mmilieiil 02, ;t2H, r.H7,r.im 2',»2 " " TinK«ie,k . Hailvviiv " Vallev/ielil ('ollon (; " VareniieH e. .Ii>ilnin " Verdun r. ('(irporalioii ol Cote St. run! r,2r, " " Verdin r. I^ch SiniirH de Notre Dame (^fil •' Village or Cote St. LoiiiHr. Unmet 5;(0 ,, ." " WentWiekliam r. n.itlnvell r.;il) torri^ran v. Seliool CnniniiHHionerH of I or> 200, OGO, 057 . TewkeHlmry Corriveau c. KiiHtwood I'. Sjinml CorKe r. Driiinnioiid ('Orse )'. Iliidson Corwin crp. dole ej'p, •■ V. Attorney (Jeneral V. ('arrier V. .(aeoli V. MaMHo V. Moryaii V. Itoi'lion Cowan ("owell ('invie Cox Covle t'l'iiij; Criinip Cole 208 351, 71 I 'I(i4 02, 22G, l.'IO (i2 .'15, .155, 45K !!)!» ;tl7,:il(i 20, ;il4,;t54, .|;iO, 577 O.IO, 752 202 »'. Sladacona InHurance Co. ]7;i, IHIi V. Vezina f,2 7;)! I ''• \Vatx.n 37^ 443^ 4Q„; 47;, 307 ; cm I Cot noir i\ I'nretitoau Colto I). Ciirric " r. Itcfrina tjottoii (>. Ontario Hank CiMiillard I). Union Navif;ation Co JjonliliiiiHt I!. 'J'hwaitfH Couliry I!. Jiarron Conpiil (I. (ioyer Coiijial V. Tiir>.'eon Coiirchene v. fJarneau Coiireliene v, I'epjn Court )i. Ciity ' V. Ciivillier p. Kinjiey 217 00 172 49, 74 :t ;!()« 281 .'17 !> 95, .'{12 270, 497, 048, 71. ■( 5H4 07 49.! (^oiiHineai, r. Sooiele de (NiiiHlriietioii Moi liirville Coutn )•• Iliiot Couture 7'. Corporation ol'tirantlmm 00. 109, 111. lOi ('out lire r. Helerv " V. MlUlliM Coveiiey r. MnlliiiH r. Iti'iiiiljiird »'. Kennedy V. Trinlenii r. Citv oCMonlreal r. l(ii4iiirdHon »'. Mirlver r. ('o(|iiereaM r. Mayor oC Monfrea! Crawford r. CaHHillw " r. (Jreat WeMlern Kiiilwav Ci Crawford v. Si ranker CrehaHHii ". .Joiich " I). La ('ie. du Clieiiiin ile Fer Slid KhI Crelien v. IFairerty Crepeaii r. (i lover Crevier v. ItrosHcaii r. Cliayer " p. Oevier CrosH V. Allan " ti. Uritinh Co. CroHwen v. O'Hara ('roHHley v. MeKeand <"!roteau r\ DiiIioIh Crui(d Coiirleinanclie v. Mailloux 29, 152 tourville i). Najry r,](; Cousiiiuau V. IJague 496, 49^7 ('nddy ('nrrio it CiiHliinj; (( t< CiiHwon Culler I'xji. Cntlinf,' Ciivillier I'. ('awHidy V. Delormo V. Hotte V. Diicondii r. OweriH V. I)lipiiy V. lianiy 17. .Ionian V. ("Iievailier I'. (:ourt r. MricliHon I'. SymcH 82, 18, :!.■!, 108, :!2, 045, .'17, 71,452, 157, .•il5, 7. 70, " I'. liionaiH "Cylielc" Tho 766 I'.MIK 497 588 i.51| 071 184 200 4fil HH 19.3 firm 242 410 .•!04 I9.'{ fi!l5 50 7(12 024 574 .■!10 .•!8:i l:i5 (i9;t 550 144 411 ,5.55 700 708 208 027 .557 OiCt 740 450 009 5(i2 .•!I8 494 .•122 07.') 272 208 002 4H4 D Dagen ». Roy lhi)i<: V. Hart he Daii'le t'. Parent DaltiBc V. Portelanoe t'. School Cotninifsioiu'rH liouis Dallaire I'xp. " n. (iravel DaUon v. Doran V. Kin- 420 247, :!00 604, 002, 702 520 of St. 104 101, 192, .^l 7 .■)59, 495,049,714 20.'l, 208,550,601, Dan loiir r. Lafraint !r 19.! Dandiirand r. Ktliier aintioi.xe 1,!, 184, 264, 588. 099 Daiijti lou )'. MarqiiiH V. Tliibodeau ;!.'i, 88 66, 70, 520 34 DauHereau i). Arelianibault 179, G2fi " V. Doiilre 4(; 47 " r, Keller 45 Daoitst I). McDonald 507, 511, 009 " V. .Montreal Turnpike Koad 'I'mntecs 7,')5 " r. I'roiilx 14 " V. Trn«lees of Montreal Turnpike Itoad 2.'57 t". Itotnhardier(! 614 JJiuHu 100, ;i08,324, 47f Darliy Duriinii 10, M.: nivre V V. (J e. Sluli'ord 000,003,004 39, 393 208 379 tl ^1 4 767 TABLE OF CASES. 768 Divrliiifr I'. Styce Dasiousr Nolan Diiudcl ii Diivid 423, 057, 739, m . v in cxp. r. Miller !'• Diulevoir v. Hurt " (1. Smith Diiviil r. Stiuliicoiia Iiisurftnce Co. 411, Davidson i\ Conpolidiited Bunk H'JO, " (!. RiiMi'l Dawes V. Fiiltt)n 20, Dawson i". HoucliurJ " V. Det'osses " I'. NM)oiiaId " r. Ofrden 180, " V. Trestler 2:!y, De Rellefenille r. Piche 90, KiO, Deblois (!. (ilass 189, Denary r . Poirier Decelles v. Hertrand 113, Dei'lieiie v. Anctil Deenian exp. Del'oy )'. Foote 50, Del'osses V. Dawnon De Gaspe c. Bessener " V. Loraiifrer De Grosseillers v. Kiendeau 6, I)e<;iiire v. Mareliand 439, Dela Dnrantaye r. Beausoleil " V. Pose Delaney i'. Lazarus Dclaronde v. Walker Delaware & Lackawanna Western Rail- way Co. V. Healy Delbar V. Landa 117, Delery v. Couture " V. Jalliert Delinelle v. Arni.'strong Delisle t>. Conimissionere of St. John's Schools Delisle V, Fortier " V. Fournier " V. Letourneux " V. Roliert " V. Valatie Delornie v. Currie Delvecchio v. Le.>iage Denier.s v. City of Montreal 326, " V. Laniarche " V. Neilan Demoiitigny v. Giolienaky " i\ Olivier Dempi^ey v, Macdougall 26, Deiiaclia\id v. Itobilaille 476, Denault v. Morin Denis o. Poitras 312, I)eiita! Association v. Young Derouin c. Oiijudinger Derrick i\ Hegina 220, Deiy D. Carpenter 367,652, Dery v. Fabre Delery ('. Jalbert Desauteia v. La Soc. de Construction Can. 3r.7, Desbarats v. Hamilton 13, lOH, Deseve v. Du.«sault 497, " 1'. Giireau Desiletf v. Beauchemin " V. (iiiigras Desi'ets v. Martel ACE 1.S2 751 149 118 187 696 143 708 395 392 355 619 321 91 5t;3 337 696 238 3;!5 38t; 309 213 367 321 27 3.58 735 461 378 259 593 627 389 614 671 289 563 165 398 206 390 141 428 557 4li4 744 371 622 42 210 596 552 465 506 254 365 435 676 471 289 360 716 649 .'.:-! 267 248 359 Desjardins t'. Ducasse " t'. Hamilton " V. Uuimet " V. Perrault " I'. Pinsoniieault Deslauriers c. Larue Deslorge v. Jjarin DosmiiroliaiH o. lieduc Desmarteau v. Baillie •' V. Man.sfield Denmarteau r. Pepin Desroberls o. Lalbnd DesroHiers r. Guerin Destiniauville v. Tou.signant Devarenne.s v. School Couiinissioncrs of St. David 21 Devine v. GritJin 617, 748 Devlin r. Beemer 46, 123, 716 I'AGi.: 41,. 333 63 57, 69, 85,. 366 3t;o 50, Ml 280,289,298,302 613 601 488, 583 31 559 728 112,716 624 " r. lierger " ('. City of Montreal " f. M.O.&O. Uy. " V. Ryan D'Extras «. Perrault DickHon y. M. & O. Forwarding Co Dillon 1'. IJorthwick " V. Prive Dinnini' in re " V. Oirouard " V. Samson " V. Wurtele Dioii V. Fogarty " V. Roy Dionne v. Baril " V. Lortie " B. Ross Dixon V. Arpin " exp. " V. Perkins 688 70, 71 33 450, 657 208 657 46, 123 615 64, (;18, 661 57, 3H0, 571 374, 375,395, .509, 512 353, (;0'J 573, 681 306, 589 21)5 57, 59 555 449 397 Dobie V. Board of Management, etc. 3ft, 72, 208, 371, 375, 448, 744 Dolan e. Fair 184 Dominion Bldg. Soc. v. Cooley 109, 1 15, 124 Dominion Fire Ins. Co., i'. Cardinal 405 Dominion Oil Cloth Co. v. Clianteloup 326 Dominion Telegranh Co. v. Bell 237, 721 Dominion Tv 1)6 founding Co. v. Canada Guarantee Co. 434, 659 Dominion Type Founding Co. v. Lafonil 141 Dompierre v. Periou 249, 543 Doniliee v. Murphy 31, 352, ('i:'2 Donovan v. Canauian Mu. Ins. Co., 406, 743 " V. .'oseph 132 " I'. McCormick 384 Doraia v. Buudreau 12, 4.55, 459 " V. School Commissioners of War- wick 6,12,166,396 Doran p. Dalton 203, 208, 567, 561 , 617 Dorion v. Benoit 577, 744 " V. Brown 42 " tt. Dorion 605, 748, " V. Marsil 657 " I). Positive Liffi Aes. Co. 411,414 " V. Roy " ti. Seminary of Montreal 704 Dorval t). Bencher 21, .355 Doucet V. McGreevy 68 e. O'Fiifre! fi.^O " V. Pinsonneault 18S " V. St. Amand 65 Dougall V. Gilinau 434 768 PAOK 4i,;w:i (i.'i 67, 09, H5, ;!(•)(; lit flO, Ml 280,289, 2'J,H,;i()2 Gi;{ 488, 58:i .1 u 5r)9 728 112, 71(1 iniit ()2l loiiiiiiifisioni'rH of 21 G17, 748 40, in, 710 088 al 70, 71 Xi 450, 057 208 varding Co. 057 40, 12.1 015 04, 018, CCA 57, :i8(), 571 374,375,395,509,512 353. (i09 573, tiHI 300, 589 205 67, 59 555 449 397 ement, etc.38,72, 208, 371, 375, 448, 744 184 iooley 109,115,124 V, Ciirdiiial 405 V. Clianteloup 320 V. Hell 237, 721 iig Co. V. Canada □o. 434, 059 ig Co. V. Latbinl 141 249, 543 31,352, (;!'2 u. Ilia. Co., 400, 743 132 .384 12, 4,55, 459 ssioners of \Var- fi, 12, 1(;0,3% 203,208, 507,501,017 677, 744 42 005, 748, 057 iHS. Co. 411,414 ontreal 704 21, 3.55 68 fi.'iO 188 05 4.34 769 Donfiall r. Rosiiia Doii^'laH I). DiiiiKJas Douliicy i>. liriivcre ^ " IV UiclianJ Doutre v. Itluiiin " !'. DaiiHcrcau " ('• liaiiriti " ". Sic. Marie " V. Walker Downie i\ Jiurrie lh>yer r. Walsii Doyoii i>. I)ny. Beliveau Duclos V. Duiiainel " !'. Tliihadeau Ducondu V. CuHhitig Dudevoir v. Uruje Dudevoir r. David Dul'aux V. Kobillard TABLE OP CASES. PA(JK 214 078 28, 739 270, 728 322 40, 47 409 47 174, .381 60, 35.3 134 209, 68(i 08 13.3, 134 382 322 289 28, 187, 070 751 734 351,714 4, 550, (ii)9 234, .5.30 149 18, 708 311 20, 204, 354, 355 733 29 148 80 297 41,3.33 84 495 Co. 744 290 685, 029 357, 51 (i 557 7li; 74(i 013 l87 22H Dnfour V. Ueaugrand Dufri'sne v. JJuhner " V. Oulwd " V- DuMJcsHis " 0. liafonde " I'. Mfclianics Bank " V. Munro Dugal V. Keg ilia pngdale v. Cily of Montreal Diiggan IK HeiiderHon Duguay V. Seath Diiliaii.e V. Ayulte Inihaniel o. OucIoh Dulmiiiel V. I'liyette Uucharnie v. Mutual Ins. Co, DuiiiaH I'. (Juiinond Duinont o. Auliert " V. GeliniiH puinontier o. Moutizambert Duncan exj>. Dunkerly u. Lord Diipaw exp. JJiiperrauli v. IJoyer DuplessiN V. DiUie.sne iJupran c. TriLst and Loan Co Diiprew V. >SynieH iJnpuis V. Haciiie L*upuy V. ik-aulieu " V. Uenani " V. CiiHliing " P. McCianaglian " V. Itullaiid Dnqiietie v. iiruulm Diiiand V. Lioni DurocluT t'xj). UuMwiull 0. Deweve " V. llenaud DuMlii! V. llouhelaga Mutual unce Co. Duval V. Northern AMUuraiice " V. Trudel Ditvernay y. Irvine Dwyer v. I-'abre iiytiVH V. Falardeau 770 I'AllC 429, 744 047, 738 20, 204, 354, 355 178 251, 308 21,2,59 (184 ■ 2;i2 605, 520 138 7,30 7 .557 .384 , etc. 412 43, 250, 315 077 89, 90, 334 046 443 254 150 729 118 357, i;40 251 oyi 392 47, 379 37,71,452, (iii'j 458 397, 020, IJT7 09 320 ;(47 497, 049 13 Fire insur- 405 410 32, 429, 409, 171 359, 3d 7, OIS 11 Co., Eastern Townships Bankan.lCorporat ofCoMiptcn V. McLcod 1 Eastern Townships Mutual Fire*Ins. Co , Bienvenu Mstwood I'. Corriveau onn Eds(jn V. Ross ^""' •'Edward Harrow," The, m' re Egan r. U,_v. Datnes Ursulines E "Cloral Lists of Jjerthier ,. Uolston Eect<,ralLiHtsofKan,ouraska° re " Eliza KeiUi" in re Elliott r. National Insurance Co. I) I'llllCPilf Eniond v. Gauthier Enipey r. Court & Mathews ii.nuis D. Godiu E ion 114 624 13, 313 751 609 020 . V. 33 416 650, 057 590 433 90, 312 95, 334 290, 300 482, 483 414 581 746 492 241, 470 Erichson u. Cuvillier Ethier v. Dandurand Eticnne v. Ditcliarine " V. I'errault European Assurance of Toronto Evans v. Arinitage " V. Cliaiiveau " V. (Jenereiix " V. Hodson " V. Hiidon " V. liaraiiiue " V. Lionais " t'. Jjortie ;; V. MeLea V. Paige Society Exchange Hank w V. V. Clark Masse Napper 272 .33, .88 495 351,492,009 V. Bank 400 20, 361 379 391 405 .36, .SIS, 454, 034 480, 021 590 383 48, 240 071 174, 308, 3.38 674 612 771 TABIiE OP CASES. F 772 i i t i :1 PAOG PAGE Fabvro i'. Perrault 394 Fletcher V. Smith 322 Fitbre f. Deny 471 Fleury V. Bergeron 19 " r. Dwyer 359 , 387, 648 Fiigiirty V. Dion 35.3, 609 Fair i: Bafdwin 397 Foley 1'. Martin 203 " !'. Cassils 180, 427 5S3, 612 Fontaine exp. r. Hooney :!84 " (-. Dolan ^ " i: SiMitli 184, 187 390 (C I'. Moiitri'al Loan and Co. Mortgage 620 Falardeau v. Dvnes " L\ Miirootte Falarileau v. Smith Falkner v. Lapointe 11 115, 574 114, 117 Forbes Ford i\ Vermette V. Fletcher 1'. Carter 69, 364 669 202, 592 67, 207 (( I'. Hiitchisjon 421, 583 " V. Kej;iiia Farmer v. Hcckliam V. Hell " V. Millov V. UWeil " i\ Stewart Farmer's Insurance Co. v. Beaul Gram 123 icu 216 31.3, 325 594, 6S8 114,588 77, 690 9, 377 207, 618 a (( Forget (( P'onieret Forte r. Ledger V. Short ti. Matliieu V. llegiiia V. Lavallee V. Det'uy u. Cily of Montreal 132 385,617 241, 470 293 24 56, 367 529 " " V. Farqiihar v. Fuller nion 414 23. 69 Fortin V. Defi.sle ti. Robert 398 203, 557 Farrell r. Uitrliie Fauclier c. Painchaud 123, 170, 172 22 « V. Say 308, 620 Faiisse i'. Urien 118 Foster V. BrockviUe and Ottawa Rail- Fttuteux L\ Dubois 311 way Co. 389, 394 " V. Fi.-ber 392 (t V. Meigs 189 " v. Gault 387 i( V. Thompson II " V. Hird 389 a V. Wright 69 " V. .lackson 615, 667 Fournicr V. Cannon 66, 200 " V. Leclairo 388 (( V. Delisle 206 " f. Montreal Loan and Mortg age <( V. Fiset 115,520 ,601 638, 658 Co. 676, 680 (C V. Tlieberge 31 " «. Parent 591 fi V. Union Bank 101 Felton t>. Corporation of Acton 432, 442, Fourquii V. McGreevy 312 541,694 Fox V, Miller 57 " V. Parker 670 Frmlet t'. Guay 77 Fevre i'. Uejiina 222 Fruiicoeur y. Barrow 209 Fergu.xon y. Roliland 456 tC t\ Mathicu 492, 493 Ferlaiid c. Frechette 201 «( V. Michaud 490, 569 F^ilibien v. Moir 461 Frank in re 229 F^iliatrault v. Laro.^e 491 Fraser I'. Abbott 645 Filion 0. Campbell 607 a V. Auld 398 " I). Guenette 500 u V. Coody 613 " V. Leciaire 20, 202, 355 t( V. Gagnon 26 Findlay v. McWilliain 30, 342 4( r. Garant 678 Firla v. Hamel 67 <( 1). Larue 667 Fiset exp. 148, 431 (( V. City of Montreal 513 " f. Fournier 115,520,601, 638, 658 (C V. Poll Hot 698, 711, 712 " v. Lepine 25 <( V. Roy 431, 622,625 Fisher v. Fauteux 392 (C V. Siiiiard 57 " V. Malo 389 (C !'. 'i'upper .349 " v. McKnight 24, 593 Frechette c. Ferland 201 Fitzgerald v. Bryant 576 Fuchs V. Legaro 309, 599 " V. Maluney Flanagan v. Mitchell 90 Fuller 1'. Fanjuhar 25, 69 624 a r. Smith 322 Flanders v. Adam 648 Fulton V. Dawes 20, 355 Fletcher v. Forbes 569 (( I'. Leiebvre 391 V. Mutual Fire Insurance Co. ft V. McDonnell 28, 182 ,240, 609, 691 434, 633 ti V. McNamee 307 G Gagne v. McGreevy " V. Stuart Gagnier v, Hamel Gagnon v. Bruneau 620 Gagnon i\ Fraser 697 a V. Hamel 626 t< V. Lapierre 205 1( V. Levi 26 67 242, 743 246 ntreal 772 I'AUK 822 I'J SS."!, Gd'J 203 lOan and Mortgage 620 5Gi) 69, 202, 51)2 421, o,s:i i:i2 38;j, 017 241, 470 21)3 24 56, 367 52'J 31)8 203, 557 308, 620 and Ottawa Rail- 389, 394 189 11 69 66, 200 206 115,520,601,638, tiM 31 k 101 312 57 77 209 492, 493 490,569 229 645 398 613 26 678 667 513 698, 711, 712 431, 622,625 57 349 201 309, 599 25,69 322 20, 355 391 28, 182, 240, 669, 691 307 26 67 242, 743 246 treal 773 Gaf^iion TABLE OF CASES. Gnhcrty Ouilluiix Oalariit'HU t Giilipiit (larand Guiiiiit Gurceau Jfuriii N,«.| Ituhiiaille 'Soi-cl (ias Co. 'Stiidauuim lii.snrance Co, Svlva Alotvy ]M\ Ai-cliamiiaiilt I'A(;k 531 589, 670 573 555 561 10, 515 10, 5!) 1 201,3,35 411 Gardner Gureau Garon Co. ('. Arres V. CiiKj Mars f. Gareaii V. Pfrkin.s I'. Coiirclieiie V- U'lMiriel V' GlolicM.-ky " . V. Ticinlilay Garrigan o. Garrjgari Gates exp. v. Stewart Gandner o. Aires Gaudry v. McDonnell Guult V. lieitrand "^ I'. Faiiteux ' V. Koliertaon win t liter exp. '' t'. IJei-govin V. Caliugliun Miiiiml l-'iie Insurance Co ol S.aMHtead •{4.4,5 tiedel'ret,etu. 610, 6s.s b filler • y.j^ Niagara Mutual Insurance 406, 743 357 209, 386, 466 5K4 188, 340 176, :wi 95,312 623, 628, 029 113, ;i,S2 359, 55(i 480 149, 614, 652 400 670 34 387 137, 6;)5 347,366 280 615 Germain v. Lacoursiere (Jervais c. AnderHon ., " f. Hey wood Gilib I', T(tii Gilili.s i: Wheeler (idieaii V. Conway (iil).soii i: Itegina Gilbert V. CoMidet i'. Lionai.s p'i'i ''■ 'IV ^'"""ick's Hall Association Gi lannie r. City of Moiilrral r,-, Gillespie V. Corporation of JJienville 4:!(). f;il.„„., .. T^ ,, 542, 57 774 PAOK 580 389 208, 307 316, 702 74, 2s;i 223, 256 88, ;m(; 176 124 621 Gilinan Gilinor Giiigrus V. Donga., i". Anger B. Wrillon V. De.silfts i'. Gingras '". ileOreevy t. ouiooi Cotnnnssioners of 8d- 574 4.34 571 324 248 5s I 421,460,621 Giraldi G I raid i V. Cie (if Clieniin de Fer de Lau- renti,le.s " 95^ ^■.^-^ y^„ '' V. Couiit.|„am.i,e V. Eiiiond V. ,Jean 0. Laloiide e. Latour V. Lepiiie V. Picard '* 0. Prevost „ " V. Hoy Gauvreau exp. V. tjongobardi i>. iSiiiuiair V. Hank of Montreal Gear Geddes 562 746 MO, 601, 703 557 622 319 113 181, 506, 751 733 348,366 344 387 103, 170 430, 5^2 320, 553 718 98, 183 140 619 160, 571 64, 618, 661 262, 378, 45''! 108 23, 108, 101) J55 V. La iJanque Jacques CartierloV, 475 V. Montreal City and District Gelinas v. Drew 0. Duiiioiit u A' ."• ^ei'in'e "Gen. Hircii," The Geiidron v. Ja.smiu Genereux v. livaii.s V. Gordon ^" V. lluwiey ". V. Spniitrle Georgian liuy Lm^^r Co. .. Macdonald Gerard v. Len.ire ,a '3 f^'l Menken ..Grannis Ji^' ^/J ^^ 645 382 89, 96, 334 18 484 377 301 360, 682 365, 431 19 . K: leeves Ger "■ lienihun main v. Cartier V. Girouaid 356 13,191,246,480 206, bl4 262, 378, 452 lery «. Vezina t;- New Citv Gas Co. v. lUiiik of Toronto " V. llenev " r. Morgan " I'. Irndel Girouaid c. Dinnintr " .. r' '^ "• ueriiiain t'. Gnindon " r. Hudon Giroux 0. Ciingiion V. Corporation olSt. Jean Chrysos- lonie •' ..,, Gla^sr. Dehlois ,^,, -.I'l Gleason c. iJlair ''' ^^"^ " t;. Van Courtland .-.^ 'U^ Glen f. Mackay o,s,^.s4 Globe Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sun Mn- "^'^ PI I , 'I'"' Insurance Co. SO 167 '•'06 Globen.sky v. Garon ' ^"'' - .1' " V. Deinontigny ,'., Glover v. Crepeau r ,, .r., Gnaedinger y. Ijertrand "^.V liw V. Derouiii ' .,,.- Goad V. Macdonald r,, Gulbout 0. Grand Trunk Railway 65 640 "in Godlrey v. Western Hospital ^ ' ^^' r,^^. Godin V. Ennis ,,11 .-.^ Ovtiv. Grand Trunk Railway ,t ' t^ Goldruig V. Hochelaga Bank 71 I35 vu I li. Goodhouy «. McGratl. ' n^' H^ Goodenough y. Csgood u' ■u'l Gooderhani t'. Haichette tj '{'J. Goodson I- Leys and Kennebec Railway 752 Gordon c. Genereux ^Wi !-J, " 0. Hudson •^''"' ^^^ "v. Scroggy „ Gosselt c. Stoiiuart ?? Govino, Tlie 3* Goyer y. Conpal *^* Graltis V. Sleeper .. Graham v. Hurlbert ,^n " --^i-'sette 30, 531, S M ullin Grammon „. Fanners' In.,,, „,„ Grand Irunk Railway Co c. it Grand Trunk Rail isnrance Cu 469 414 irewster 622, 688 , aiice Co way V. Citizens Jiisu 63, 400 775 TABLE OP OASES. PAGE Gnind Trunk Railway Co. v. Corporation .. "[^'^'■''' ^ „ :i8, GOl Kiiihvav Co. V. Corporation „ of'J'iii^'wick 2:iG " KiiiKvay Co. v. Oodbout „ ^ 65, 640, 740 ' *'. Kellert ]4,{ V. Livingstone i< ,, 145, fi43 " «'. McDonald (14,{ 2:in 41!) 2:^, 240 i;i, 2M 640 Lovett iianisay Kuel Kue.«t Tingwiok Wilson ■ 2;)(), 54.3, (i46 y7, 3la, 363 623 6.")!» 205, 613 564 386, 387 207 OreensliieldH e. Wyman GrwiHvocHl V. Thompson Ui-enier v. Lyron.x «. Muyor of Montreal ^ ." V. Pothier Wrier u.N'orinandeau (irilKn V. Di'vine (iriditli V. Page (irivean v. (^luimpaLMie GroHeo. Boyiiioii , !Ci:;r:;.'r,if,^l:^:: ""-^ Trustees 90. 334, 62.^ 776 PAnE 418, 571.627 HH, 25.!, 600 271,667 2,S5, 520. IIOl 116.314 63a 617, 748 ' 449 625 303 Grannis v. Geriken Grant i\ JJeaudry '■ V. Chuieii " V. Lavoie " V. Kegina ^ " V. Watson Gi-apliicCo. u. Prentice Grattun v. Curjxjratiun of St. Scholastlque ''00 Gravel .:•(]£;;; ^^' ^-> ^ '' ::!;:£: 359,495,649,71:; „ " «. Martin ;"',' Grayy. Quebec liank 17,: ',i\ " V. Vanalstvne lip jifj Gray H Creek Dairy Co. v. Mullin ' Great Western KajKvay Co. v. Crawford 6( Greeny. City of Montreal 491 530 -io" Grotlie 0. Langevin Gnay c. Bellay V. Ulanchet " V. Fnidet " 0. Mailette " V. Mercier Gueiiettey. Filion Guerin y. De^rosiers Guertin v. Nolan " V. Pii(|uette '' V. Patenaude " V. Trust and Loan Co. liuest V. Macplierson Guevreniont v. Tunslall Guilbaulii). Larocoue OniHianlt 0. Michaud UiiiliMotte i\ Lafieur Guiinont v. Metliot Guindon i\ Girouard (iunn p. Hrouillard Gunner i\ Helaiiger Guy D. City ol Montreal " V. Guy " V Norniandeau 370 64, 209,426,621 208 77 468 239 500 112 244, 317 489 567 4,574 248 289 379 460 468 57 108 648 97, 352 263,313,5;)9, 605,662 603,712,713 606, 721 f! H H. v.T. Hache v. McOauvran Hadrill v. Kerr Hagerty v. Crelien Haggerty v. Morris Hale V. liobertson Hall V. iirigham " I'. Canada Copper " V. McLaren •' V. Price " V. Hegina " V. liobertson " V. Zernichon Bailee v. Astill " v. Hallee Haniel v. iiourget " V. Fiola " V. Gagnier V. Gagnon V. Laliberte r. Marchildon V. Panet Hamilton v. Beauchene " V. Christie " V. Desbarats " t'. Desjardins V. Roy V. Wall it f( 236, .582 457 459, 717 316 68, 569 134 202, tid^ and Sulphur Co. 234, 506 89 207,460 349, 657 379 132,616 I 493 344 358, 602 67 626 67 624 345, 346 367, 497 201, 279, 300, 302, 303 676, 698 13, 108, 716 63 385 703 Haniing 0. Turcotte Hanipson r. Tliomp.son Haiids v. Jlav Hanlan 0. StiiiiJey Harbor Coniinis,„i-jner8 of Montreal v Clanaghan ^b " Conimi,ssioners of Montreal v. St Lawrence Steam Elevatin 64, 600, 64, Mc- 257, 320 655 714 731 623 Co. Hardy v. Scott Harni burger !•. Hillyard „ " ^ V. McDoiigall Hart V. Beard " f. Boutliillier " V. Bowdon " • V. Choquet ''^ V. Cook " ^- Goriwation of Missisouoi ' V. David " f. Hart " V, Jovce " V. Sniith " V. Therien Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Bell Hartlauby. Siege.-t tfarwood v. McCallum HatclK'tte V. Bury 11 V. Cahill V. Gooderhaoi 194, 425, 240, 16, 25, 433, 370 616 377 457 253 547 470 430 654 443 696 620 701 547 409 414 613 626 394 500 684 776 PAOE 418, 571. 027 271, f;(;7 2,S5, .02!!, tlOI iiG. ;ti4 CM G17, 748 ' 449 625 c Koad Trustees 90, 334, (i24 » .171) 64, 209, 426, (121 ' 298 77 468 239 600 112 244, 317 489 557 4, 574 24.S 289 379 460 468 57 108 (i48 97, 352 263,313,539, 605, (i(i2 603, 712, 713 605, 721 layman Ufiipson of Montreal lagiie te jde ml Loan Co n istall lie id r 'eal un 320 64, 655 500, 714 H 731 •s ol Montreal v. Mo- *" , „ 257, 623 •a of Montreal v. St. e Steum Elevatinj; 194, 370 rd gall Missisquoi e Co. V. Bell 425, 616 377 457 253 547 240, 470 430 654 443 696 16, 620 25, 433, 701 647 469 414 613 626 394 500 88, 684 779 Hiitcliotte r. Roliertson llation i: Niitionul Insurance Co. MiiwUcs r. Cutlery lliiy r. Iliuiils llayvcrii r. Uitchot Head r. Miiriav llcak TABLE OP CASES. 38;) 170,625,715 616, 618, 625, (;2S 45(; 460 , 4:i0 84 5i)l» 614 390 calcy I'xi). ' ' c. Delaware, l^ackawannn and Wes" tern Uailwav Iloarlp 1-. Kliiiid llcarn r. Maiuiiev " ('. Mitiolifrick " V. V'cziiia Heath r. Clement Ileaton c. Cossant Heliert r. Hellorose " ('. Houlerisse " v. Menard 3, 416, 418, 516, 599, w I T. 603,647 Henderson r. Dn^'gan " i>. Henderson " I'. Morin v. St. Michel Road Co. " V. Stallurd " '•. Treinblay Heney r. Oirani " ('. Ireland Hennessey r. Sheridan Herald l*rintin;u' Co. n. Workman Heritable Securities i\ Kaciiio PAGK 394 167 134 500, 714 9 45 .348, 349 Holland Holme Holmes i'. Drumniond Holton „ " " I'. Wriiiht Heron i\ Sonliere Heroux c. Clement Heyneman r. Smith Heywodd r. Gervais Hibbard v. Baylis Hick son i: Hegina Hills r. Christie Hilyard v. Harm burger Hird i>. Fauteux Hochelaga Bank i\ GoldrinL' Hodson Hoe Hogan Hogne Mutual Fire Du.stin i\ Kelly V. Mas.se V. Evans V. Mullins V. Bernier V. Cousineau 619 138 208 90, 391 454, 725 552 86, (Ih:) 140 4(12 133, 110 290 385, 423, 583, 658, 699 5(11 202 41, 333, 43S 59, 1.(4 20rt, 397 193 217,221,472 295 377 388 71,135, 1.38,426 I'. v. r. r. V. Hume !'. " Fire Homier r. r. i: Cassils Carter Sean Ian Aikens Andrews Callaghan Ctirjiuration West Cunnolly Insurance Co. v. Stanton Ibdsseuu Morin Henuud r. Aikin r. liank ol'Toronto r. Harsaiiju r. Western Assurance Co. c. Rejiina ('. ('urrie c. Ciirijoration of Quebec I'. Yule v. Alcock . i: Generenx Hubert r. Barthe " i: Mayor of Montreal c. McLennan Hood Horner Hotte Hdii^rh ILiward Iluwie llowlev 780 PAOB 4, 550, 699 24,619 426 234, 458, 459 48, 534, (i23, t;:!4 17, 2(15 5,34, 537 of St. Gabriel 26 378 71, 11)5 692, 717 6>i, (19 497, 198 203 b Insurance Co. v. 405 407, 413, 745 404 465 549 670 496, 498 189 386 409 451, 173 82, 132,615 1 18 208 24 365, 431 122, 187 67, 423 r, „ - S8, 213,633 tottun to. i: Canada Shippin" V<, AC, "■ J''^""'< 36, 31,-S 454, t;:i4 V. (urouard 23, 108, 109 V. Mallette 673, 574, 739 r. .liarceau 4,v;y '■• ••i'l'ichaud 84, 269, 738 ('• .^clioiil CominissionersofHoche- r 'Tm S23 '"■ ^ "•"ilelle 203, .321,556 " V. Corse Hughes i\ Recs Hunt c. Corporation of Quebec Huntingdiin i\ White Huut i: Cloutier " ('. Coutu " ('. Hoy Hurlbnrt r- iiraliam Hnrteau c. Pelletier Hiirtubuise i\ Buurret Hus V. Joseph " V. xMillet Huston l\ Pacaud Hutchinson c. Ford Ibbotson ('. Ouimet Ireland v. Heney Irvine v. Duvernay 691 4ii2 32, 429,469, 471 Irwin Ivers r. Boy.>r V. Lemieux 464 54, 622 520 58 615 588 29. 78, 314 660 192, 502 133 15, 680 56 396, 672, 090 421, 583 54 266 Jackson v. Fauteiix 615, 667 " V. Lighthall 41,4.38 " V. Midiiiemiss 4, 549 " V. I'revost 34,618, 744 Jacob V. Cote 317, 346 27 Jacques Cartier Permanent Societv i'. Roy Jaeger i\ Sauve. Jalbert v. Delery Jameson c. Steele Building 21, 465 '.• 9 'I A.M' 781 Jftnea JucjiioH Jasmin TABLE OF OASES. Jciui Jcdc tluliill Jidoin ifuliiison Joly Sun Mutual Insurance Co. Wurtliinj'tou (ii'ridron Tllihodc'im Giuitliier Jeaiiiiotte c. Sucit'te ile Foucier r. MuN'iiuglitou r. Itfgina i\ Shuter r. Vuri-nnee I'. IjiMigtin V. 8coti ^^ iMacilonaid V. Moreau I'AUE 644 Join's ex]). v. Cri'liassa r. Mayor of Iberville V. MuNuniee :n7 550, r.07, 703 Pret ct Crt'dii 359, G48 678,679 61,3H-) 97, 159, 307, 3ir) no, 4,sM 65, 71, 369,371,374 (i39 213 62 1 38, 630, 753 135, 308 Jones V. Montreal Cotton Co. (1 i>. Pearson i( V, Powell V cc r. Uart Jul>iiivil e f. Mulcair Judali ('. Mason (( V. Iticliler 782 PAOK 172 2U8 6 226 341 Co. 414, 603 6.S1 208 157, 315, 494 711 132 15, 680 4(i4 464, 652 546 25. 433, 701 183, 24t/, 460 238 472, 474 K Kane it Kaulbach Keaiie Kearns Kearney Keller (( Kellert Kelly Kemp Kennedy Kennedy 11, 84, 650, 674, 18.3, Racine Wright Beamish Muoi'e O -Re illy Logan J'ansereau Watson (irand Trunk Railway lielaiiger City ol Quebec Hoclielaga Mutual Insurance 729 570 76 .SI 7 181 383 45 50, 90, 334 143 43(i 539 4.31, 234, Co Short Synions Smith Cowell McKinnon MolsoQS Bank 407,413, 745 489 262 508 694 200, 206, 618 101 Kerouack o. Canada Fire In.suranoe Co. Kerr V. UlOWII V. Hadrill V. Kegina V. Les Siuurs de L'Asile, etc, t'. Kirkpatrick D. Dakon " V. Piiisonnault Kingsborougii v. Pownd Kirkpatrick v. Kershaw Quebec Bank Budden Kerry Kershaw Km" Knapp Knight Knijiht Knox Krana Kyte 409 48, 168 469,717 214, 223 196, 726 575 18,493 42 14, 16, 362, 696 675 386 631 La RaiKjue Nationals 383 McCorkill Ross Latleur - . Sabine V. Reynolds 496, 559 390 203,619 367 111 La Banque Jacques Cartier v. Beau,9oleil r d" XT ". . " ^'- Oeddes 102, La Banque Nationale !\ Knight " " V. Leniieux " " , V. Societe de Con- struction 109. I9(i. La Banque Ville Marie is Lp.nrin ' 4''2 V. M.^Lciin " " V. Prmieau V. Wil>un 101, Laliatt La belle Laberge Labonte LaciTte (< V. Trester V. Beau pre r. Gratton U, 29, I'. Le Clercs de St. Viateur V. Sayer 315 t'. Leduc V. ijainesse r. I.HJoie V. Pliilibert 396 475 383 545 260 ti2i; 23 109 417 726 690 688 194 7., 3 635 249 298 299 Lacey v. Drapeau 68 Lachapellew. Beaudoin 490 La Congregation de la Croix v. Metiviur 78 Lacoursiere v. Germain 5,so V. Terreau 397 V. Booth 89, 626 ('. Buhner 740 V. Thompson 141 V. Curne 648, 736 " V. Morasse 182 La Fabrique de St. Enfant Jesus v. Poirier 153, 154, 430, 737 " " Jesus V. Pigeon 154 V. Nouveaii Monde 31,544 V. Provost 204 V. Dubrule 29 V. Owens 488, 561 V. Prendergast 1 9, 333, 724 V. SomerviUe 285, 286, 292 Lacroix Ladouceur Laferriere ti Latlaninie 782 PAOI Cotton Co. 172 au8 6 226 ;mi 1 In*4 464, 652 lie 546 25, 433, 701 183, 240, 460 238 472, 474 re Insurance Co. 409 48, 168 45y, 717 214, 223 JeL'Asile, etc. 1%, 726 t 575 18,4'J3 t 42 14, 16, 362, 6U6 i\v 676 : Bank 385 1 631 que Nationale 383 all 496, 559 3U0 203, 619 367 la 111 roix V. Metivier 68 490 78 680 397 89, 626 746 Q 141 648, 736 182 it Ji'sus I'. Poirier 153, 154,430, 737 Jesue c. Pigeon 154 Monde iSt 31,544 204 29 488, 561 19,333, 724 285, 286, 292 783 TABLB OP CASKS. 784 Laflpur It (I (( i< Lafoni) V. Heauilrv V. Unitielle I'AdE 461,609 650 404 468 203, 619 728 V. CitizciiH Insurance Co I'. Ouilmette V. Knox ('. Clioiiiimni " V. DcsrobertH , '' , . I'- I'oniinion Type Foiimlry 141 Lafraniboise v. Damour 13, 184, 264, 588, 699 LafraiiiDoise (!. l^ajoie 4,s9 ". w. Winilsor Hotel Co. 173 Lafreniere r. Marier 507 >'■ Iticliflieu & Ontario Naviga- PAOE Lanpis i>. Boulo 750 Lan;i:loiM v. Hourke ggi " I'. Nornmrid 243, 3t;4 " V. Valin 36, 41, 71, 279, 282, 2s5. „ , , „^ 287, 296, 306, , 333, 451, 752 Lnnfishaw," The 4^2, 4^3 Un.mettf r. I..•^ Cure, etc. of St. Paul 160 l^an tiller v. Chiuii|iHj;ne 30, 5h:i 22, 415 84 192 64 29 249 470 608 3H5 59 298 4.S9 115,674 57, 142 393, 624 745 31 484 483 526 68 225, 432 24, 108 624 61- 214 16 tion Co. Lagacp n, Ayotte Ijatrj^ett exiK Lalmie v. Ucauchene " V. MuMartin Lainesse v. Lulionte " V. Lavergne Laiiievillc i\ Lecours Lajoif (1. Hi'lair Lajoiei'. Citizens Insurance Co. " V. Laoerte " V. LaframlMiise " V. Miirneault " r. Mullin " D. Piffisis " V. Uolicptson " V. Woods " Lake Ciiamplain," The " Lake St. Clair," Tlie Lalanceite v. Lizotte Lalanne v. Carter " I'. Retina Laliberte i>. CJienard V. Haniel " I'. Paris " «'. Uegina " ''• 'ii'elle iDi LaLiKte P]lec(oral of Bertliierw. Ralt^ton 95, 334 Lalonde v. HHimger r,50, 601 .. ''■ H''".'«' 28, 187, 670 V. I ulresne 251, .368 I'. (lautliier c-,7 " V. MoGlinn ssj " V. St. Denis . 266 Laniarche i\ Blancliard 612, 617 " c. Deiners ' H'] Lnniartelliere v. Seers 147 Liiiiil) r. Hicwuter 71 79 LaiMbt-rt r. Cliartrand Qyj '' . !'■ (^"I'ponu ion of Three Rivers 235 Latnbkin y. South Eastern Railway Co ^ ^ . 63,70,236,427,544,641 Lamoureux c. Arpm 259,263,417 Laniy r. Cusson 5,;2 Lancaj^hire Ins. Co. v. Chapman 408 1.. A Iv. Rv. c. Wusou Mnfg. Co. Landa r. Dejlmr " V. Pduleur Landry v. Theherge Lane r. Blanchard " V. Board of Temporalities Langelier v. Blouin " V. Brousseau " i\ Laroolie " »'. Perrault Langevin i\ Broasard 395 057 125 32 743 Laperriere (■. Miirlinrau " V. Mu. Fire Ins. Co. Lapierre i'. Cliaiii|)oux " V. Cioutier " V. Oagnoii 242, V. London & Lancashire Ins. Co. -♦"0.411 i>. L'Union .St. Joseph " V. Pelletier " r. Tessier Laplante i-. Laplante Lapoiiite e. Faulkner LapriHe «. Methot " V. Reginu Laramee v. Evans L'Archeveque v. .loutfray Lareau v. Beaudry V. Poirier Larlcheliere i». Metayer Larinif'e v. Boca^e Larin v. ('hapnia'n " V. Deslorges Laroche r. Langelier " V. JIalte Larochelley. Barbeau V. RcUi Larocque r. Duuhesnay " V. (juibault " 1). Roval liis. Co. " IK Wi'llett Larose v. Chausse " f. City ofMo.itreal " t'. Filiatrault " .~ Midland " t\ Rousseau Larouche v. Regina Larue v. Dealaurieis " ('. Eraser "v. Loranger La Sisseraye v. McMahon 59, 106, 482 456 85 199 67, ■">7 24, >H5 215 486, 621 546 178, 312 338, 628, ti.)2 614, 7,')4 240 183 613 124 441, 569 377 57, 207 685, 629 379 406, 743 246 251 236, 529 491 489 506 225 280, 289, 298, 302 667 42, 333 .')58 V. Grotli6 64.3 117,614 174, 247 70 150, 260, 430 372, 427, 587 209, 584, 672 47. 124 302 6«, 298, 303, 654 379 La Soc. d' Agriculture c. Robert 717 ^'' " de Construction v. Beaiichanip 647, 732 " " " V. Cliarlebois G47 " I". Desautels sgo " " " Can,y.LaBa..,]ue „ „ , ^ Rationale 109, 1%, 260 rie Construction v. Robillard 4 ;j92 La Soc. Per. de la Biiie do Febvre t'. Parent 425 " " " de Construction n. Leonard SSK ' " " " " Jacques Car- tier V. Pose " " " de Construction Montarville ('. Cou-ineau " " " deCcJii-iniction St. Jacques y ,c „ » ''';',"'l""' . 359,649 (If t instruction V. Prevost n*; ae&t.Loui8t>. Villeneiive 477 de Construction v. Wilson 173, 315 Latoiioiie 5gg 174, 200 622 259 4*97 Lator.oiie v. Latour v. Campbell " V. Gautliier i 786 TABr-B OF OAfi&a. 786 I-nMilinpe r. Mermfird FADE 206 ' J/iilirt'iil r. |t ,ur,rp l.uuiciitiiiii lU IT- t'fjiste l.'iO, 315, r»n7, flTO Laiiriii I". ntiiit(ii«« Vi'" Mnrie 422, ti2(l " V, Doiitre liiiii/.nii c. Qiiclicc Street liy, J^iiviillce i: Koiiieret Lavioletle ejii, r. Truiiel " /•. Hvan Lavenliei'e r. It. N. A. Land Co. ].,av( rjine c. IjiiiiieMJe l..avij;iie t: McKeii/k' Liivoie r. ('niii'knlmiik " r. (iniiit " ('. KlK.'illC Law lor r. Cuiulion La/.iinis r. Delaiicy " r. Sdiilier Ijearc. Chiiii la Sliii)i)iiij; Co. " r. .IdliMSoii LeartiKiiiili r. Illuis Leliel I". lilaLT'l'iii " II. I'liriiihl lieiilaiic r. Lelilano Ja' lii'iitillicr r. Mury:n,\\ Lelirii r. liedarii " r. Valiii Lecaviiiiter r. Uuhillard Lecliiiie I'. Fiiiiieux Leulaii' I'. Filion " r. .Icis('|ili Leouurp r. jjaiiieville Ledou.x I". Picutle Lediic ('. Desmaixliais " V. Jackson " ('. I.aher;.'e " r. Woieiii Assurance Co. Let'elivre v. Hraiutliiiiid CI, 4(1» 21, ;i.iH (i:tti 21 147, 148,204,4:11 21(1 (ihd .170 fiOO 20S 205, til, •! 27M ;■)'.) 2 i')',):! Cu2 III (hS i;x I flit i)r)(i i:^4, ir.ii, ")14 20, 3o5, (>l 7 72S 280, 282, 2',);t ;iss 20, 202, :t,-.,-. 4(14 MiH 110. -).i4 Dill .'):7(l 41! 360, G49, ()H7 :!!»1 4til (Ull ;i5li 24.3, 3i;4 iS(l, 5(i(t 17.'<. 4SS 24li 21, r. Fulton " c. Flanicinilon " r. I'roiil.x " i,-. Quintal " r. Steam Navigation Co " r. 'I'urgeoi. LeI'elivre r. Xv/Aim Leluiilnn r. Holduu 24(1,480 Le^rare c. Fuclis WJ, i')'J'J " I'. Mignaiilt 002 " (.'. K.Jl-H (i()(i Lejiendre r. Plaiite lo J.eger i'. Funl ' l:)2 Legge i: Laureiitian Railwaj' 159, 315, 507, 571) •' r. Le.L'L'e Ki, 228 Leniaire I'. Ciiarlelioiti (i,-i4 " V. Payment 600, 652 Leniay //( Jfi 5'J3, 730 Leiiiieux c. Jver.i 2(U) " V. La Banque Nttio; -i 545 " V. Leonard 40, 7!;- " r. Rei;ina z'^^i Leiuire r. Gelimis 18 " V. (lenereux " t). Gerard L, 1P9, 257 Leiiioine f. Lionai.s 201 Leonard r. La Soc. de Conatriiction 356 " r. Leniieux 440, 718 " /:. liegina 216, 22i Lenoir v. llallette 66, 67 l!eau( it Marg ■audry irnuillierf I'AOE 37, 73, 454, 637 32 118 3fi2 320, ()32 469 26 319 477 646 271,667 411 464 194 V, ■al liPiioir I,'. Uitnhie Lejittjje ('. Hdly " r. MrnHHard " iv l'il-/n " r. Witt^rt " r. Wyfo»' Iie|»ine »'. Fiwt e. (iautliier r. Matliieu Lepruluin c. U-se lie St. En- fant JeKUM r. Poirier 163 " Cure, etc., ol St. Enlant .le-u.^ r. Roy 154 " " it MarjrudlierrH of St. llyuuiiitiio i: Renaud 146 " " it Marj;uilliernof St. Paul c. La- nonette 160 " " etc., of St. Tlioiuas r. I,a Cie. de Moulin de Pierreville 152 Lei- ReiigieuseH, et( ., v. MclJord 647, 698 Les Rev. Dames |{^ieuse,«, et(!. r. School Couiinisbioner.suf Riviere du Loup 163, 605 Lesuard r. Corp. of Three River,s 235 l-e>nor r. Misell 247 Les SuMirs de L'Asile, etc., I- Kerry 196,726 " "' " Notre Dame i;. Corpn of Ver- dun 651 Lex Syndic.' de St. Ourn ;•. Allair 154 " " etc., y. Samson 734 Letendre v. Berard 568, 583, 584 Letdiirneux i\ Delisic ,'iyo Leveille exp. 447, 474 Leves(iue i\ City of Montreal 525 " c. Mc'Cready 120 Levi i\ Gagnon 246 " i\ Reed -,i; Levi)* A: Kennebec Ry. v. Goodson Co. Lewis v. Wason Manufacturing V. VVyatt Ry 657 Levy r. Barbeau Lewi.'. II. Levi..* & K " c. McGinley " V. Windsor Hotel Co. L'lleureux 0. Belaud " I'. Martineau " I'. May L'llostie V. Wagner Lightliall p. Jackson Lim ' • Western Assurance Co. Liiij^ I . Regina Lionais «. Cuvillier " V. Evans " V. Gilbert " y. Jjemoiiie " V. Molsons Bank 63:i 385 657 209 172 165 81 316 23, 106 41, 438 413 219 602 590 176 201 86, 749 ^ IC fll8. Co 786 PAnK 37, 73, 45 J, f.37 32 118 362 320, (132 469 2S 319 477 U16 271, (!li7 411 464 rj4 i\ Liihfllc M (ie Mull I r- '111 /'. 1H6, 549 1 lie Montreal e. 152, 589 iiii'iitile IJennliiir- iliird 7, 15(1,321,480 . ISii'dii^sc lie St. iM r. BwiiiliHii 153 iniisKc do St. Kn- . I'uiricT 153 iuit ,)c-ii.-< r. Roy 154 ot St. llyuciiithe r St. Paul c. La- 146 IGO lias r. La Cip. de 'icrrt'ville 152 IcC'unI 647, 61*8 ■I'S, etc. r. Scliool itrs of lii V iere !Htoiu' r. Grand Trunk Uv. II.) Lizottc (/. Lalaneette Logan II. Uradlcy " r. Kfariicy London y. Laiicaslnre I iCe Lis. Co, r. Lapicrre Lon^' i: Hiaiudiaid 150, Lonnuliardi r. (Jinivreau L(inj;|ii'o r. PatI munle Loii^^tiii (!. .fnliiiM.Mi 97, 159, " V. Moiiii llny\] i'ermanent Bui inj; Society Luranger r. f'lcnient 4,39, " ('. i ifGa^pa " ('. I.arue Lord ('. OiinUerly " V. Morin PAriu 320 ;t.''in 1(173 , (W;! 526 617 3H3 4110,411 260, 430 344 89 .307, 316 591 463, ■)52 .•i,-)8 42, 3:i:i 2,Vl 398 Loriie r. Arelirr " r. Clark " r. Didiine " ('. HvaiiM " r. Ituuleai) Lottiiivillc r. McGreevy l.oui.i I'. Kocliptte Luvctt r. Grand Trunk Railway liUVHcau )\ Cliarlioniicau Lozeau v. Cliarlioiincau l.iU'kliurHt r. City of Mimtreal Luke V. Wicklitli- L'l'niun St. .lacijiieH r. ItidiiHle " St. Jiiseph (1. LapierreSO, 106, LuHignaii p. Medard Lu-• 65,71,369,371,374 " ;'. Mm-kay 3, 9, .32, 625 Macdongall t\ l)i'iii|i^iey 26, 596 " y. Moil I real Warehousing Co. 169, 417, 418, 453 " tJ. Union Navigation Co. 170, ,, , 172,448,6.54 Macdnfl' r. Bluiklock Kjy Macfiiilane c. (Caldwell 387, 391 •' V. Niagara District Insurance „ , t;o. 206 Mackay v. Glen 284 "• Ifoiith 3, 9, 32, 85, 625 " t'. St. Lawrence Salmon Co. 61,378 Mackenzie r. Wliite 61, 281 Maclean i\ Banijne Ville Marie Macpher.~ioii i\ Guest Madden r. Ciiiitweli Magi,stra ea Court lb' Co. of Brome v •1 ".luni (». Magnan , , .'.larnan Maguire v. Rackett Maher v. Ayliner " V. B'ruckhart Mahony B. Beaudet Maille o. Richler 23 248 322 431 657 131 51 l;!6 58, 675 19,464,721 Maillou.x i\ Corporation of St. Alexandre ' 537 V. Cotirtenianche " V. Trudeau Major V. Boucher " V. Cliadwick " I'. Chartraiid Malliiot I'. Bonrgoiii Biirrunghs . Citv ot'Montreal r. Gravel /•■ Omuv r. Hud'on " V. Lei.oir Malleval v. AmLrois V. Mallettei 29, 155 614 96 425 95, 96, 628 370, 627 20,; 36, 372, 53.'. 206 4t;.s 573, 574, 739 66,67 139 Malo I). Fisher " I). Melaiifion Maloney c. Hearii Maiislield r. Dcsniarteau Marais r. Hrodeur " ('. Couture Maiceau i\ Hndon " V. Ross Marchand r. (July " r. DciTuire V. Wilkes Marchildon c. Haniel Marcott V. Roliitaille Marcutte e. Falardeau ('. Noel " V- Paquin Marier v. Lai'reniere Marion 0. Morin Marleau 0. Martineau Miirler v- Molsons Bank Marlow r. Rohertson " V. Stewart Marois «. Bolduc Marquis exp. " V. Danjou " V. Vancourllandt Mar.son v. Magnan " r. Siniard " ('. Tessier Marshall v. Coifing .Miirsil I', Dorion Marsolais v. Braiilt Martel Martin V. Beaudet V. Desiietfl V. Roclieleau V. Seneca! exp. r Bayard (■• Ci jioration of .Ascot r. Corporation of Hull I'. V'Ai-y V. Gravel !' PerkiiLS V. Quebec Permanent Society 889 189 616, 618, 625, 627 34 207 184 489 625 467 439, 461 21, 110 345, 346 439 115,574 748 291 607 148 91 103, IKS 90,626 HI 243, 364 443 65, 76, 620 6,3, 425 657 13, 80, 191, 240, .365 665 66 657 246 601 359 292, 293, 294, 298 616 348 200 234 111,534 203 724 573 Building 681 7S9 TABLE OP CASS8. 790 Martin v. Regina Maitiiieau v. Lnpiirripro " V. L'Henreiix ('. .Marleiui V, •hidiili i\ Cute V. Hoclielaga ance Co. Mason M as.so Mnssue V. RoLillarcl V. linint'aii " V. J'riiiicHU Mut'iu'wson V. O'Kfilly Mutl PAOE 22;? 81 !)! 28H 20, m-i, 354, 430, 578 Mutual Iii8ui'- 404 V. Lu Uunque d'Ecl]anpe 85, (;74 295, 3!:),424 61,281,282, 2!Kf, 302 3G 210, (il2 705 241,470 41)2, 41)3 477, (175 441,5(!U (i8,S 31(! I'lia'iiix Life Insurance Co. 403 . r. Rcjiina 215 jVlavoi- ot Iberville r. Jones 38,030, 753 " «kt'. of Montreal c. Uronn G4, 32H Cramp Druimnond Grenier Huliert Mol.-on Morrison Stephens Parsons lieu Watte Maxuell May Mayl'Mry Maviiard V. lie rant V. Forj;et V. Francwur V. Lepine t'. Lamclie v. Cooper r. l/Heureux " Sorel Mayrand f. Aujre Mi'Aiinally v. Brennan McArthur v. MuUiolland I'. Kiddell i>. Whyte McAiiley i\ Seniple JlcCalirey exp. " r. Bruiieau " )'. C lax ton McCalhini v. Harwood MeCani bridge co-w. McClanaglian c. l)u V ipuy 1!)3 234 234 67, 423 372, 51 10,518 327 640 131 491,58") 391, 577 67, 201; 672 373 349, 366 67 343, 3(15 626 14H 458 Harbor Conunissioners of Montreal 257, 623 " V. St. Aiin',s Mutual Biiild- ., „ , '»« Society 37, 125, 205, 450 McLonkey v. Canadian Navigation Co. 143, 622 V. Les Religieuees, &c. McCord McCorkilJ exp " V. Knigiit Mc('(irinick i\ Donovan McCready McDonald McDonnell (( McDoiigall JI( Kacliern Jli'I'lvila McGauvran (( M 'iibbou McOiiiivi-ay MctJinley McUinnis 647, 698 11, 714 496, 569 3S4 120 507, 511,609 Daw.son ',)i Grand Trunk Railway 64.3 Seiiez 113, 3H(i Fiillon 28, 182, 240,669.691 (iaiidry (170 Harniliurger 457 City of Jlontreal 513 Corporation of Ragot 479, 5.!() '•• Ilaclie ' 457 ('• Stewart 392, 64H I'- Moise .|(^(j .". Ro.^.M (;|;-, ('. Lewis 209 1". Carreau 20I i i: I.evesque V. Di..yiiHt 1'. V. r. i\ V. V, i\ r Mcfjlinn v. Lalonde McCioldrick v. Hearn Mcfirail r. Merchants Bank McGrath v. Goodbotly McGreevy i\ Roomer " I'. Doiicet " r. Foiirquin " V. Gagne " I'. Gingras " V. Lottinville V. Vanasse re V. Vezina V. Royer V. Commercial Mutual Bu ing Society V. Adam.s Mcldibe in Melnnes Mclver Mclntyre (( McKeand McKenzie it McKinnon I'. Darling Cro.'-'sley l.avigne Shaw Kennedy Thompson Trndel Fisher Rank of Montreal Allan McKiiight McLachlan r McLagan v Mclaughlin exj). Mcliareu i'. Drew V. Hall V. Ostell McLea v. Evans McLean v. Sinclair McLennan v. Hubert " V. Trenhohne McLeod V. Eastern Townships PAGE .353 456 97 176, 441 187 68 312' 620 421,460,621 427, 658 313 4.16 692, 744 440, 463 Id- 205, 680 208 39, 393 21, 700 560 1.39, 241 200, 20(1, 618 64,67,207,624, 726 342, 390, 428 24, 593 113 34, 250 147, 204 322 89 688 48, 240 680 88, 243, 633 47, 123,314 Rank 113,313,751 68 6S8 29 253, 269 132,135 .316 179 135 McLynn v, O'Rrien McMahan v. Lasisseraye McMartin v. Lahaie McMaster i'. ^.xureau " r. Robertson McMillan v. Bethune MeMinn v. Molsons Bank McNaniee exp. " V. Fulton " V. Jones McNanghton v. Jette Mi'Neely v. Stainforth M(.'Nicli"ol8 V. Badeau McQueen v. Phienix Insurance Co, Me Williams exp. McWilliam v. Findlay Mechanics Rank v. Rramlev " " V. Dufresne " " U.St. Jean 61,62,98,99 378 Meier y. Reling Meigs V. Foster Melanijon c. Ressemer tv Malo 136 180 307 308 06 691 85. 307 406 474 30, .342 61,110 21, 259 310, Mel les Menard I'revost .Swales Hebert Menzies r. Rell Meichanta Bank «. McGniil " " V. Murphy " " V. Sams(>n " V. Whitfield 420 83 189 644 189 251,578,707 207 3, 416,418,516, 599, 603, (147, 649 22, 440 97 658, (il6 380, 382 63 790 PAGE ie 353 456 ants I3a nk 97 i(xly 176,441 er 187 t 68 uin 312' 620 B 421,4(10,621 nlle 427 , 658 se 313 436 1 692 44t ,744 ,463 Brcial M itiial IS Uilli- jiety 20c 39 ,680 208 , 393 f > 21 139 , 700 560 ,241 y 2n( , 20(; ,618 ■1011 C4, C7 •-'07 , (124 , 726 ;i4: , 390 24 ,428 , 593 Montreal 113 34 ,250 147 ,204 322 89 688 48 ,240 580 88 , 243 633 le 47 ,123 314 Towns lipf B ank 113 ,313 751 68 ye 253, 668 29 269 1 132 135 346 Bank 179, 135, 85, 136 180 3err6 51,31.'! " " r. Syiue.s ' 49 " Building ■ Society v. Bean- champ 647, 732 " Hnilding Society r. Konian Catholic School Coiiimis- FACE Leroux 411 295 239 420 64,65, l;i8 614, 754 57 24, 585 Moiiirean r. Lnrooijne Moiijreriais c. Roidioii iMi'iilehamps c. I'erra."! Montizaiiilpei't i\ Dnmoiitier Muntrail r. WillmniM FAGE 379 696 187, 315, 118, 603 646 199,591 Meiinier Meyer.s Midland Miclion 439, 457 62 214 490, 5(19 460 489 5:i5 17 20, 355 (I8;i 16, 255 4,550 697 6(12 118 67 56 18, 666 114,588 378, 396 6(17 63 176,381 115,574 Hioners ' 0. Corporation of Levis i'. Ke;:ina 1 I'. Fninciciir V. Guillianit V. Lai'o,«e V. Uiilland V. Vezina i\ Morency I). Mnllin Middleniiss i\ Attorney General " •('. Jackson' " i: Nuns of L'Hotel Dieii Mijrnerand c. Lej,'are Millar p. Daiidelin Miller V. Fo.x Millet v. Hns Millette (1. St, Cyr Ml Hoy V. Farmer " V. O'Brien " i'. Kooney Mills V. Weare Miner v. Shaw Mineauli «. Lajoie Mini.'^ter of St. Andrew's v. Board of Tem- poralities 58, 91, 197, 626 Ali.sell 0. Lessor 247 Mitchell i\ Flanagan (i'jt Moat V. .\Iaison (;,si " «. Renny 71,578 Moffat i). St. Amour ■ 4nl Moher y. linickert i;-{^ Moir v. Fllibien 4(;i Moisan v. Moat f,xi ," I'. Roche 88,346 Moi.se r. Mi'Gilihon 4si) Mollenr v. Murphy 509 Moloney v. Fitzgerald yy Molson V. Carter 72, 90, 141,312,423,425, 614,695 " r. City of Montreal 427,524 " V. Ivemiedy 1(|| " I'. Mayor of Montreal 372,518 " V. O'Brien i8;j, ,)07 Molsons Bank ii. Caniphell L'jl " " i'. Kennedy l()[ " " ''■ Lionais 86, 749 " " «. Marler 103, 188 " «. McMinn l,i6 " " t'. Railway and New.spaper AlvertisingCo. 101,173 " " n, Seymour II4 I Monarquc i\ Rawley 71;^ Mdtidelet I'. Regina 213 Mondou i\ Quintal 632, 691 Montreal Cenlre Election, in re 286 " City and District Savings Bunk r. Geildes G45 " City Passenger Railway c. At- tiirney (Jeiieral " 710 " City Passenger Railway i\ Cor- restine 240 " Cotton Co. v. Corporation of Sala- lierry 62,67,541 Cotton Co. !'. Jones 17;) " V. Parliam 5u;^ " and Ottawa Forwarding Co. c. Dicksdii c-,7 " Loan and Mortgage Co. v. Bell 692 V. Fun- , teiix 67(1, 680 " Loan and Mortgage Co. v. Fon- taine 020 Ottawa and Occidental Railwav i\ Bourgoin37, 174, 194. 32(1. 449, 481,617,(126, (l:i9. 641 " Ottawa and Occidental Kailwav V. Devlin " 33 " Ottawa and Occidental Railway I'. Tienian 180 " Ottawa and Western Railwav (;. Bury " 29 Permanent Building Society v. Desautels ;J57 " Portland and Boston Railwav v. Ansrera 194, 371,' 612, 643 " Turnnike Road v. Daoust 735 " VVareliousing Co. v. Macdongall 169,417,418, 450 " V. Roval Cana- dian Insurance Co. 169, 418, 4.53 Moore i". Keane Morasse i\ Ladouceur Moreau c. July " V. McMaster Alorency v. Miclion " ('. Morency Morey v. Gaherty Morgan, in re. "■ V. Baillie " V. Cote " t'. Girard " V. Lehuutillier " V. Rees Morin '■• Wiggins Bissonnelte Denault 'ragnon Henderson Homier Lord Morin Marion 317 182 639 253, 269 20, 355 2(19 10,591 395 626 6.36, 752 619 134, 159, 514 421,422,612 18, 493 265, 558 465 531 90. 391 M, 69 398 261 148 (123 Morisette v. Corporation of Bienville " ('. Graliam 30, 531, 616 Morrieri'. Rascony 526 M-rrill v. Har-iern Townships Bank 569, 626. Morris V. Haggerty fjs, ."xii) Morrison^ «. Mayor of Montreal 10, 51s,' ;-):i:{ Moss V. Amoa 159, 384 793 TABLE OF CASES. 794 JIos,« r. Haftor ilotz c. Pitrailis Mount Royal I'oriiiancnt liuildingSociel' PAOK Ml 0.S7 ('. lioiijrtiii MiiU'air r. Juliinvilie Jhiliiolland i\ Vw ,U- Foiulerie r. MoArtlair Mnllai'ky i: IMiuiit'ur Miilliii c. Ui-owii " r. (Jraliain " r. Gray Creek Dairy Co. " r. I^ajoie " r. Jliclioii iVJI iH.'i, 240, 400 32, 108 31)1, 577 133 201, 3s:i 4(1!) 14 57, 13G, 142 083 Mul r. Xiajrara District Fire Insurance to. 200 ins t\ Cooney 200 " r. lloe 5|y Munioipality ol Rronie c. Covcv 37, 422, 443 " Mile End y. Picotte 110,' 534 Mniiro r. Dnfipsno .Mnr|,iliy c. Coiinnily /•. I'diiihce" " v. Mcrcliaritu Bank " i<. Mdlieiir " r. Siadaconn Bunk " v. Thon)as " ('. Windsor Hotel Co. Murray i\ Attorney General " I'. Rickerdike " r. Head " r. Stewart Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v ijaperriere PAOB 084 379, 3!)7 ' 31, 352, 092 558, Olti 509 391 28, 070 - 171 00, 72, 407 45 46 382 Diilinrnie 412,744 V. Flelclier 434,033 of Siaiistfud i\ Gal i put 34,415 ofStanstead y, 657 N Nadeau v. BoufTard " J». Corporation of Bienville " V. Pacaud Nasiy v. Courville Napper c. Kxcliange Bank Mai'lionne cjy. National In.surance Co. i'. Aitken " V. Black <« (C « " ('. Cartier " i\ Chevrier " r. Elliott '■■ 1). Hatton Paijre St. Cyr 56 150, 407, 32, 172. 414, 33, 43.117. 425, Ncault i'. St. Cyr Neil an v. Deniers Neild I'. Sail Nelson c. Siuivvdon Neveii c. Salois New City Gas Co. i>. Gir.ildi v" x" , ," T ''-^'''v"« 190,194, iNew lork Lite Insurance Co. r. Parent " V. Talhct ' i\ V ezma Niagara Mutual Insurance Co. i\ Garceau 406, " " " " V. Maclar- lane 14 623 117 517 012 349 4(i2 744 108 313 410 107 107 308 299 622 602 579 084 718 239 412 412 409 743 200 Niagara District Fire Insurance Co- «. Mullin Niagara District Fire Insurance Co. v. Perry Niagara District Fire Insurance Co. v. Quintal Nit.sch r. Osborne Nivin V. Lynn Noad 0. Noad Noel V. Gagnon " ('. Liiverdiere " V. Marcoite Noiseux I). Vigneux Nolaii r. Dastous " V. Guertin Norniand f. Langlois " V. Sliortis " I'. St. Lawrence Navigation C< 454 Normandeau i\ Bougie V. Orier " V. Guv " Nornianton," The Northern Assurance Co. t'. Duval " V. Robert Nouveau Monde v. Laferriere Nowell r. Reeves Xnns of Hotel Dieu y. Middleinisa Nye V. Perkins 52, 437, 442, 700, 589, 150, 23.3, 423, 057, 7.39, 244, 243, 65, 259, 605, 484, 31, 206 407 169 11 316 749 070 686 748 468 754 317 304 556 661 88 039 721 485 410 080 544 381 097 678 Giikes )• O'Brien c rienients 316,488 Coiiiniercial Mutual Building Society (". Faii.vsn V. McLynii I'. Milluv ;j78 Olson ih;j V. Prescott r. Kegiim r. Thomas 251, 307 I'. \V eaver 170 120 68 390 307 7.31 22.' O'ltna Life Insurance Co. v. Rookliih'e 0"Farrel y. Brassard 70, 71, 104, " V. Doucet " V. Garneau 023, " y. Reciprocity Mining Co. Osrden y. Dawson O'Halloran i\ Barlow " y. Boucher 4, O'Hara r. Cnissen 253, Oliver y. Colehrook Roiling Mills' " V. Darling 717 030, 056 030 628, 029 90, 334 180, 503 8.5, 018 .5.^10. .^74 209. 555 511,518 208 794 PAGE fiS4 ;n9, ;ii)7 55H, cm 509 81»1 28, CTC' 171 00, 72, 107 45 46 382 V. Diiliarnip 412, 744 V. Fletcher 4:i4,(i33 of SdlliSteiul IK r;iili|iiit 34,415 oi'Stanstcad v. 657 Bank iihk el Co, leral Co nsurance Co • V. 20G nsurance Co . V. 407 nsuranne Co . 0. 169 11 52 ,316 437, 442 700 749 589 670 086 748 ir.(), 2;!3, 468 423, 057, 7:!i) 754 244 317 24:i, 304 65, 259, 556 s Navigation Co. 451, 661 88 (539 fi05, 721 484, 485 . Duval 410 080 iere 31, 544 3Sl ddlernisa 097 678 I', RookliilL'e 717 70, 71, 104,030, (150 030 623, (!2S, (i29 iniiig Co. 90, 334 180, 503 85, 018 4, 550. ;m 4 253, 209, 555 lolling Mills 511,518 208 795 A.- nwiW ..i;>ai(&tjy "■ te "-' w^irv' TABLE OF CASES. Olivier v. Demontignv Omalley v. S,.,,tiis|, Commercial Impu nince Co. 32.414 Uiiieara v. Aii^rer 260 Oi)a.-l{enerat cjrji^ 213 I'- C(Mi)nii8sioner*' ol'Q. JI. & O. AGE , 210 ' Ostell Ottawa O'lNeil Kaihvftv J". I'iiriiier Ontario Bank v. Cotton " i'. J>ioi)ai.s O'Reilly Osborne O.sgooil Ostell i: Union Bank . KearnH Matlieweon Xit,-cli (■ooihioiii'h . Ulake 31 , .327 77, 090 66 320 114, .339 IKl 210,012 81 16. 303 227 Onellette Oiiiinct t'. MoLaren Agricnltiirnl Sheriiliin Ottawa Agriciiliural Tourigiiy V. Kcgiiia V. lierirevin (.'. Dc.-janlins I', lliliotfon V. .Merino i\ Piclie r. Tlieoret ('. Cnsliing ('. Ijufinninie V. Union Bank Insurance Insurance Ow ens 79G VAC, E 688 \). V. "3.410 o. r. 4. 11)9. 415 15S. 220 91. -,50 09, 85, 3(;(; 091 ■120 002, 702 450 -188. 501 609 651 Pacaiid V. Con.«tant V. Corporation of Princeville T. 620,621,022 V. Drapeau i;rj i'{4 '■'• ""'•'''o'l 390, oVV, 090 ''• liCtiel gq V. Naileau gg ]]^ '' ('. Queen Insurance Co. 70, 400 V. J li.eroux 89, 90, 334 y. Grithth ' '4J9 t). Tellier g^g V. hvans ,;^i '' r. National Insurance Co. 33, 107 V. I'onton ik; •jn,. Pamcliaud y. Fancher ^^^'.j.^ !; {IP.:\T ^4> 2C9, 738 V. W ad ley 209 V. Metacomet National Bank „ . 04, 05, 138 V. Brais !;• {^j'-^'^^'-au G97 V. Haniel 0(57 4(1- Pangborn ('. Arm.'-trong . ""'?,''.', langnian w. Arcliainbault 2U) i'anneion v. Kheanme 237, 249,438 405 Papin..,. 612,022 i. aquet v. Citizen.s Insurance Co. 4(i.'i V. Versailles 7. M t'. wati.s ;;-. Paquette v. Central Vermont Railway 230. 040 V. Guertin ^j^,, 215,217,221,220 Page it Paige Paine Panct Paquin Paradis Pare Parent V. Kegina V. Marcotte om V. Aiotz i;l V. Scottish Imperial Insurance Co. 410 ''■ ^'S'e m, 002, 702 V. I'auteux ^yj V. La Sociote de la Bale de J. Thibadeau Perron I'.Belisle Perry i?. Niagara District Ini=. Co. " V. I'ell " V. Ro;:iiia Peters r. iScnecal Petit Clerc v. IJcnoit Piiaiient'c. Ciiciiraiie " f. Kllintt " t\ .Mill larky Philibert r. Lacerte Pliilion (I. Bisson Plio-iiix Life Ins. Co. v. Maylmry TABLE OP CASES. 79H I'. McQueen Pioarii r. Gatitliier " ('. Parent " r. Vallee Piche c. DelK-llefeuille " f. Oulniet Picotte I'. Ijeijoiix Pierce v. BuKers Pigeon ('. Faliriqne lie St. Paul Pin.sonnault r. Brown " t\ Brniiet " r. Desjardins " r. Doiiuet i: King Pi ton in re. " i\ Corporation of Quebec " r. Lepage Planiondon r. Lefebvre Plante c. Bonrgoin " c. Carrier " c. [jegPhdre " V. UorMtailie Ples.sis i\ Belair " i*. Lajoie Plouffe i\ I'oirier Poirier v. Deeary " u. LaFalirique de St. Enfant Jesus 154, 480, 7.37 " V. Lareati 338, (!2S, (132 " V. PlontFe S.-iu, (i7,j Poiasant v. Burrette 54, 3(12 Poitraa i'. Bercer 439, \M " v. Clialoner 200 " 11. Citv of Quebec 37, 443, 449, 473 " V. Denis 312, 50ti PA(iK 4H7 498 59 407 83, 208, 213 225 427, 5(14 137 313, 5H0 581 133 299 555, fi.'ii 403 40(1 713 (11(1 209, (15« 96, 130, 69(1 5.>^7 110,534 (1, 442 154, 155 22. 4(17 (100 50, 314, 600 188 42 382,394,613 6L3 352 461 17 81,310 15 463, 652 490 393, 624 555, 675 335 PACE Pinilbriant r. '''^igneux 318 I'onton r. Paige 116,306 I'orielance v. Dalbec 526 Pose ('. La Soc. de Con. Jaeq u 's Cart er 259 Positive ]j'fe Assurance Co. t\ Donon 411,414 I'othier r. Orenier 116,314 Poiilet n. Antaya 139 " ('. Launiere 135 " V. Kesrina 219 Pouleur 0. Lamia 174, 247 Poulin /'. Arpin 110, .382 " V. WilliaiTis 4, 669 Pouliot r. Berli-aiid 492 , 661, 623 " V. Frasfr 6;8 , 711,712 " r. Solo 616 Ponpart v. Veronceau 692 Powell r. Jone.o 6 " V. Palter.-on 244 " r. Rolib 670 " iv Walkers 472 Pownd r. Kiiij:sborong]i 14, 16, 362, 696 I'rendergas; r. Latlainnif 19, 333, 724 Prentice r. The (irapliic Co. 207 PrescMilt r. O'Brien 731 l^reston c. Paxton 623 Prevost r. Bell 111 " i\ Gantliier 180, 506, 751 " (,". Jackson 34, 618, 744 " r. Laferriere 204 " r. La S,,c Can. F ran. d e Cons de Montreal 125 " V MeIar,(;on 251, 578, 707 " i'. Rodgers 559 " V. Wil.son & Roilgers 610 Price r. Hall 207, 460 Prime v. Perkins 88, 322 Primeaii r. B.mijue Ville Marie 109 " r. Massue 36 " w Trudeau 83 « Prince-s Royal," The 484 Prive 11. Dilloii 615 I'roiilx V. Daoust 14 " ('. Leiehvre 602 Provincial Insurance Co. V. Bai lie 401,434 « li i> c. Connolly 313, 403 « 11 « v. Converse 408 li n a V. Roy 50, 400 Pudney v. Chartrand 243 'I Q "Quebec," The Quebec Bank r. Gray " " ('. Knapp " M. 0. k 0. Raihv.ay v. Sims " Pernument Building Society v. Martin lload Trustees v. Grosleau 90, 334, " " (1. Walsh " Street Railway i\ Lauzon Queen Insurance Co. i\ Attorney General It 485, 486 Queen In su ranee Co. t\ Pacnnd 70 406 176 323 a (( <6 r. Parsons 448 385 a 'J Trunk Railwar "Ranger," The Rasconi v. Morrier Rascony v. Union Navigation Co. Kawley tJ. Monarque ,.^ ,., Rawlings V. Citizens Insurance Co. 47, 180,' 401 liayniond fi. Valin 094 Reay v. Riddel 175 Reciprocity i\Iining Co. v. O'Farrel 90, 334 390 95, 334 419 4H3 520 172 712. 713 Reed Rees V. Levi »'. Hughes Morgan Reeves v. Cunipbell " 11. 'reriken " V. Nowell Regina d. Ahraliams V. Bain " V. Barthe " !). Bissonnette V. Bleau " p. Boucher " V. Bourassa " V. Chouinard " I'. City of Fredericton " V. Coote 54, 022 421,422,612 242 350 381 215,217, 220 222 2/9 216, 227 216 218 316 227 37, 448 449 ■I'gina I'. O'Brien !' Onellctte r. Paqiiet i\ Perry r. I'oulVt c. Queen Insurance Co. i: Scott i\ Severn V. Sir Francis Hincks " V. Smith " V. Sprutigli V. Taylor " V. Warner V. Wood V. Wyllie Regnier v. Turcotte Keid V. Larochelle V. Smith Reniillard v. Cowan Kenahan v. Geriken Renaud v. Dassault I'. Hotiiier 800 FACE 225 158,220 21.5,217, 221.220 225 219 37 220 447 98,101, 217,223, 477 218 217 432 221 206 215,311 140, 57, V. Les Cure, etc., of St, Hyacin- 429 207 441 401 240, 4,«0 13 497, 498 V. Corporation of St. Sauvsur 200, 530 V. Cotte i\ Derrick ». Dougall V. Dugal V. Falkner I'. Fevre V. Forget V. Gibson V. Glass r. Grant V. Hall V. Hickson V. Horner V. Jobin I', Jones V. Kerr V. Lalanne V. Laliberte V. Laprise V. Larouche V. Leinieux »', Leonard i'. Ling «', liynch V. Martin V. Maynard I'. Meyers V. Mondelet 217 220, 435 214 214, 222 10 222 293 223, 250 225 504 .349, 057 217, 221, 472 461, J 73 39 226 214, 223 225 214, 432 215 225 220 216,224 219 216 223, 224 215 214 213 Rena Kendall Kenny Rhicard Rhichard (( Rhind it Khotles tt (( Rice <( Richard Richler St Kickaby Kicker Ki.ldell r, 146 1.36, 337 389 401 71, 578 272 90, 312 111 497 17,603 658 270, 728 170, 625, 745 617, 745 .651 133 197 603 the V. Vandusen V. Convey V. Brody V. Moat V. Workman Rev. Daniet Ursulines v. Egan Reynolds v. Kyte Rheaume v. Caille " V. Panneton 237, 249, 43E, 40.5, „, . 612,622 V, Chicoine »'. Cornell V. Dontney V. Hearle V. Williamson i". Black V. Robinson V. Starnes v. Boscovitz V. Stadacona Insurance Co. 168, .384 I'. Biekell (;.>y " V. Wiirtele yii Richardson v. Covie 24'' Richelieu v. City of Montreal 505 " and UnttiriO Navigation Co. i\ I,iafreniere 22, 415 "••'udah 472^474 i'-Mttjll6 19,464,721 '■■/,^,e'l 38,201,669 «•• Simon 25, 147, 251 V. Davidson ■j9<) " i*. jVcArtiiur 67,206 '•■He.iy 175 Kiendeau i\ Cor[)oi-alioi- of Village of St. Jean Baptisle ° .35 1', Degrosseillerg fi 7')-, "V, 13^ 191 i\ Corfwration of St, Germain 525 V- City ol Montreal 236, 528 Rinalian Kingiiet Riopel 801 TABLE OF CASES. 802 Rioux Ritchie Kitchot R<>l>l> Kiilicit v. Turcot (e f. Fiin-cil )'. liCiioir V. V. r L\ V' V. f . Mavvorii . I'cnvcl! (jiirpomtioii of Levis Hi'iiriind IVIisle Fort in !,ii Socioto (I'AgricuUure c Xnrtlifjiraves r. V. r. Robertson i V V. RoliilJard Kcberl Trust iuiil Loan Co. Vautriu , Gauil Hall Hatcliette Ijajtiie r. .Marlow v- McMaster r. Suiitli i\ Stevenson r. Caverliill !'. Duliiux ('. Leoavallier PACE 241, :!(IS I2:i, 17(1, 172 37, 7.{,lat,(l;!7 y 283, ;i01 ui 203, ,5r)7 717 OHO 7.S OS 570 137, 0!)5 134, 379 3;)4 743 90. 020 132, 135 385, 392 132 72, 73, 211, 54S 22ti 280, 2«2, 293 I'. Les Cure, etc., of Beau lianmis 7,150,321,480 " r. Masse 295,315,424 " I'. S(}cie(e Can. Fran, de Con- struction 592 Robinson v. Bowen 109 " r. La Societe Per. de Construction 4 V. llliodca i;!;i 320, 403 470, 552 573 439 403, 052 88, 340 292, 293, 294, 29.8 Robitailie r llliodca . Bolduo Deneciiaud " i\ (lagnon " v. Marootte r. Plante Roche V. Moisan Rocheleau v. .\[arte] " V. Sinclair Roidiette r. J.,ouis Rocher ('. fieproiion Roclion i\ Cole " V. Mongeuais Rockett r. Maj^tiire Rod;;ers (>. I'revost Rcidriirne ej->>. Rohlaiid r. Ferguson Rolle /•. Coi'|)oration of Stoke Rolland r. Beaudry " ('. Citizens Lisurance Co. " V. Dupuy " V. Ferguson 30, 39, 41 ; Holland ('. Michaud " r. Sivniour " ('. Til'lin " V. Villeneuve Rooklidge i\ /Ktna Life Insurance Co itoonie r. Ward Roonev i\ Fair " " V. Milloy Ross I'. Citizens Insurance Co. " r. Dionnc " i: Fdson " c. Knight " r. licgare " r. Marceau " r. .McGillivray " r. Perkins " c. Sniiih " !'. Tetu " r. Torrance " V. Webster Rouleau V. Bergevin " I". Lortie " i\ Treniblay Rou=seau v. Bousqiiet " t'. l^arose Roussel I'. Bureau Knuth c. Mackay Riiy i\ Belanger " V. Bourassa " r. Dagen " y. Dion " r. Dorion " ('. Fraser " r. (Jauthier " ('. Hamilton " y. Iluot " ('. Jaoiues Cartier Per. Building Sucietv 305,"G95 " ('. Les Cure, etc-, of St. Knfant Jesus 154, 1.55 " V. Provincial Lisurance Co. 50, 400 " c. Tliiliault 535,038 " ('. Tciiiclietie 703 Royal Caiiailian lasuraiice Co., c. Mont- real Warehousing Co. 109, 418, 453 " Institution )'- Simpson .'is.', " Insurance Co. i\ Laroci]ue 400, 743 Rue! r. Grand Trunk Railway 23, 240 Kiielle ('. Laliberte [(Ji Riiest I', (inuid Trunk Railway 13, 239 Ryan k. Devlin " .j;,^ i;^^ " v. Laviolette 'J Hi Ryder v. Vaughan n PAOB 5, 33 381 , 553 390, 403 200 717 1.35, .338 187 007 587 67, 59 590 390 006 025 015 170,730 509. (■>80 490 418,420,452 377 431, 029 00 550 9,515, 510 500 300, 051 3, 9, 85 320, 400 710, 717 420 573, 081 320, 400 431,(;22, 025 7.33 385 29. 78, 314 Sabine r- Krans Salt ('. Nield Salois i\ Xeveii Sal-as ('. New City Gas Co. Sainson r. Dinning " I'. Les Syndics " V. Merchants Bank V. Watson 307 425, 502 084 190, 191,239 57, 3>;o, 571 7.; I 380, 382 180, :!95 Sanboken v. Can. Mutual Insurance Co. 404 Sanliorn v. Anderaon Sa ex}). 347 Sanachagrin i'. Sauvageau .Saiisfa<;on Saucy Sauriiure Saumiers Sauvageau Saiivu V. Boucher V. Caron V. Brunei /'. Alloway V. Joseph V. Shuter V. Saiis(!lia;rrin i\ Corporation Argenleuil of the Co. of V. Ja eger 591 455 203 199 404 407 591 722 21,405 m-y •'.' y? ■. 802 PAliK 6, 35 381 , 553 8'J(), 4r.3 2(;o iisurancf Co. 717 l.'ij, .338 187 Gfi7 e Co. 587 57, 59 596 .390 cm fi25 G15 17fi, 730 5ui). (WO 496 39,41 7, 418,420,4.52 377 431, 629 66 r^r>n 9,515, 516 51)6 .360, 651 ,3, 9, K5 320, 460 716, 717 426 573,681 320, 460 431,(;22, 625 733 385 29, 78,314 ■•.Bull ling Siicit'lv 365,"695 >t. Kill lilt JvsilH 154, 155 ce Go. 50, 400 535, 638 703 Co., i\ Mont- ig Co. 169,418,453 )n 3S5 occiue 406, 743 way 23, 2 10 161 lihviiy 13,239 450, 657 2 16 11 of tlic Co. of 591 455 263 199 464 467 591 722 21,465 803 .Sauv L' l\ Sll r. V Say i'.F(,i-| live (■roiiiicnu Sea III .Vi'i- r. i.al.clli. 11 oIlllCH 'iiii r. .St. i'icri Suttii Sdiuol Cull TABLE PAOfc 731 307, .■ilis 30H, 020 315, 7.33 2.34, 45H, 459 OF CASES. SI icndaii I'. Ottaw Sliort ( aiicc Co !i Agriciiltural Insiir 80i I'.\(iK iniissioiiers of IIool SI 110,4S9 I SI r. K( iii'ij >ai'Kalim iflajru 0. lorli.s r. Noi iiiaiid uiiiiiii.-siDiier.s of Ilochi'l 163 Slnilcr /•.,! Olllll t iliiil loll lara V. "MiiiiiHsioiiersofMoMtroalc.M, l!i iiiciitijr .Soou'iv 523 ! S S V. .Saunders ■'ii'iiciN(,fi{iv"j,.,.eij !9, 417 C Da 11 li(iiii) 1110, etc 11 OllllMI-KIUIlUl-dOf Uoxloii ('. Ji( 605 Ion -uniiiiissioiier.s of Sillerv y. ( 2.58, 314 C jrras ■"■•'iiiiisHi„n<.rsofSt,.Colui,il,an';'. iJiUTello C'oniiMi.v-ioiieivsofSt. David i-. D, vareiiiieH ^'oiiiiiiis.sioiiers ol'St. Ji iiiiiard r. ]■ laser 7.3, 416 385, (;i7 22S, -isu 65, 259, .556 32 678, 679 467 49 G13 r. Cor|jui'alioii of M ontiiiorpiioi 53.3, Mnri ■an 531, 537, 630 minims r '•I- 'SI. O. &0. Uail l:i,80, lyi 240 ■'iriion r. lieaiii'lieii way 4.30, 542 164, 24,- St. J iides c. I), •oimiiissiuiierH of St. I. Dall ICO aii- lOiiLs i: oniiin.-s.(,iier,sof St.Marl 163 164 Si Kic.k(_ inpsoii c. Jtuyal Institution c. An-iell fuill SInooiines McNanirliton biindair i\ V. Pe! .312 1 9, 504 25, 147, 251 671 -'•'iO, 667, 715 Koi'lielcan .can Pierre ic r. St. oomiiiissKmers of Tewl 10, 237, .5,s9, 694 " C, Scott v.C, " r. 11 turnjian Miiiiii,--ii,,iior8 of W Doiais kc-iiiirv i\ iirwic Sioiil r. Diirand Sir Friiiicis Ilineksc. Re Slater r. l{eli,«le " '■• Penan It eioqiiin 'gina 98,217, 223 4H3 :im 209 580 320 l(i5 I ."^Iccjicr r. (iniftis Sr iiarl (■ WiU A I ■on lairo 101,477 134,612 4.S7 61 418,574 i'|'"i'atiun of Parish of St. ,) 6, 12, 166,396 l ^""'''.v ''■ Convey 671 ■43 " r. il Scotti.sh C •loiiiison ■'avclte nmercial Insurance C U'iMal' 01 Scriver I lev :o. r. nnicrial I V. .8 1 "5uro;:j.'y r. (lord i|)lcioii Seatli Se 'er.s (' Se. \ )iiKiiay Ion ciiiartclliere iiiiier Hillary o( Montreal c. Dor Sciiipl Seiiecal <.i: lu-aiilay croiiic 53H I 425, (ilO i lll),4ss i 325, .326 220 I 32. 414 I i^urance Co. c. Pare 410 22 59 730 300 53 147 5s f ■ion 7,,., 5V.3 Siiiitli" r. I) lljltLKt r. (,'liicli r. David 'aianleau •"letcher Miller Hv art neiiian r. .lost'pli )' Kciii|) '". Lcelain r. kc^rina r. Keid c. U(il,ert; U W ■on i: .Miirtei I'ctcr.s vatt ■^nowdoii r. Xi,. 102 i ''^"1" '■• Pnllliot' 616 rate C: iciiiical Cc r. W Sen Scrjreant r. lilai il cDon; Scrro i\ Mcii-o Severn r. R I'poiitan Bank c''ina ~iewel Sev '•■ lioiirk nioiir (• Sha ■■'Oils Bank land 428, 564 11.3, .3S6 5sl 61, 313 447 597, 6.SI •line /■. StunelioMse aw p. Boiir.'el .381, C asey 114 552 i20 Soiiier\ille i\ Lat\ Sorel (ias Co. c. C Stnicv r. ("ai-on lazuriis nicy r. C Soulier r. I Soniicre r. I. Soiitii Eastern C iiniiie jai'iion icrfiii "itipany's ] poration oi D taiKvavr. Co II iiilwav Co. r. I I'nniiiioiid 597, 623 736 I1,4H7 M3 114, 117 322 322 .547 59,1.34 464, 652 508 464 218 ■440 ^■^r,, ;ii)2 509, 680 285 1.37 579 616 199 ^^i, 286, 292 555 589, 618 672 202 , 643 31 'im Ilk in 6.3 V. AleKenzi I'. AI Her V- St. Loui Slie.i r, ,r Shearer r Sheridan v, 11 P irent eun essey -127, 592 139, 242 176, 3.SI 123. .340 341 409, 632 133, 140 Sprinkle r. Cencreiix Spronle r. Corriveau Sprung licjr ina St. Ainaini r. Doiicct St. Anioiir f. Jlollat St. AniiM Mutual Building Soc C St. Auhin V. St. A anaghan ubin '0,236,427,544,641 19 208 217 65 . , 4«1 iPfv r. Mo- ^^^ 125, 205,-450 6, 492 806 TABLE OF CASKS. 806 St. Cyr V. Millette " V. National Insurance Co. " r. Noaiilt St. Oavic) I'. Devarennes St. Denis ('. Liilondo St. Jean v, IS lea PAOB 18, CM 43, 117, :!0H 2".I'J 2> 2fi(; 5Hy V. Mechanics Bank 61 , 62, 98, 99, 378, 420 St. Lawrence Navigation Co. i'. Borlasc 144, 2;i8, 70'J " " " V. Nor- niaiid 454, GGl St. Lawrence Salmon Fishing Co. v. Mac- kay 61,378 St. Lawrence Steam Elevating Co. v. Har- bor CoMiniissiuaers 194, 370 St. Lniiis i.. Shaw 123,340 Ste. Marie i\ Doutre 47 r. Wood 554 St. Michel K lad Co. v. Henderson 454, 725 St. Patrick's Hall Association v. Gilbert 124 St. Pierre v. llainville 390 " r. Soantlin 110, 489 " I'. School Commissioners of St. Marthe 10, 237, 589, 694 Stadacona Bank r. Miirnliy 391 " " i<. Walker 184 " Insurance Co. v. Cote 173, 183 " y. David 411,708 " V. Oagnon 561 " V. Lymburner 412 " « " V. Uice 168, 3S4 " " " V. Trudel 168, 583 Stafford ('.Darling 379 " V. Henderson 552 Stainforth r. MoNeely 691 Stanley v. Davidson 390, 395 " I'. Han Ian 64, 731 Stanton y. Home Fire Insurance C^^. 71,405 K (( Stapleton c. Scriver Starnes v. Rtuxies Stale ('. City of Montreal Steam Navigation Co. v. Lel'ebvro PAOK 22 197 531,591 243, 364 Steele I', .(amieson 457 Stephens V. Mayor of Montreal 327 Stevens ti. Perkins 687 Stevenson V. Burstall 118 a V- Robertson 132 Stewart ». Bayard 427 tt 11. Brewis 120 V. Cable V. Court 427, 654 49 tt V. Farmer 9, 377 1 1 t'. McGauvrnn 392, 648 (( t'. Marler 111 X V. Murray 382 Stoddart ii. Uossett 44 Stonehouse v. Sonne 199 Strange r. Thompson 13, 249, 351,513 Stringer V. Crawford 702 Stuart V. Gagne 697 (( V. White 52, 686 Stvce V. Darling 182, 2.33 Suite V. Bell ti. Boudreau 51,456 65 Sun Mutual Insurance Go V. Gloi)C Mutual Insurance Co 89, 167, 206 i< (( tt tt V. Janes 414, 603 Swales V. Melles 207 Sweet V. Walker 115, 600 Sylva V. Gagnon 10, 515 Sylvestre V. Brissette 288 .Sytnes V. Cuvillier V. Dupr^s 268 251 it V. Metrojxilitan Bank 49 u V. Voligny 203 Synions V. Kelly 262 Svndics de St. Henri v. Carrier 622 T Talbot 1). Belivean 692 ii V. New York Life Insu ranee Co. 412 Tarte i\ Cimon 293, 295, 430 Tate V. Torrance 509, 570 Taylor V. Alexander 117 t'c V. Hegina 432 Terrcau V. Laooursiere 397 Tellier V. Page 619 Tessier V. Lapierre 85 Cl V. Marsan 555 Tetu V. Gibb 316, 702 ii V. Rose 496 TImver Tlit'berge V. An sell 651, 683 V. Fournier 31 a 1'. Latidry 70 Theoret V. Berthelot 731 ii V. Ouimet 662, 702 Theriault )). Ducharme 290 Therien V. Beausoleil 577 (i I'. Hart 469 Theroux V. ]51anchard 19,652 (( V. Pacaud 89, 96, 334 Thibadeau u. Beai'doin 381, 383 tc e. Danjou 34 « V. Duclos 716 Thibadeau v. Jasmin " 1'. Perrault Thibault r. Rov Thifbiult V. Vaillet Tliivierge i'. Bouchard Thomas c. Murphy " V. U'Brien Thompson v. Bank of Montreal " r. Beard " V. Cimon 377 498 535, 638 623 588, 618, 668 28, 676 251, 307 171 384 118 Thomson Thwaites Thy mens Tiernan Tiiiiii Torcapel txp. 148, 149, 150, 205, 348, 349,364,513 11 88, 253, 690 64, 655 141 64, 67, 207, 342, 390, 624, 726 13, 249, ,351,513 35,244,506, 731,744 49, 743 456, 459, 574 180, 370 300, 463 613 V. Foster V. Greenwood I'. Hanipson V. Lacroix i\ Mackiiinon t). Strange V. Wat.son V. Coulthurat I'. Beautranc V. Cie. de Chemin de Fer V. Roiland V. Cherrier r-i itreftl jt'febvro ontreal 806 PAOK 22 197 5:U,5'Jl 243, :ilit 457 327 118 m 427 120 427, 054 49 9, 377 > 392, 1)48 111 382 44 199 13,249,351,513 702 697 52, G86 182, 233 51,456 65 ).». Globe Miitiml X 89, 107, 20G V. Janes 414, 603 207 115, 600 10, 515 288 268 251 I Bank 49 203 262 irrier 622 jtreal 377 498 535, 638 623 588, 618, 668 28,676 251, 307 171 384 118 3, 150, 205, 348, 349,364,513 11 88, 253, 690 64, 655 141 64, 67, 207, 342, 390.624,726 13, 249, 351,513 35,244,606, 731,744 49, 743 456, 459, 574 lin de Fer 180, 370 390, 403 613 ■. ■t»t*.-U"iJ' '^ 807 Torrnnce <( Toiitlictte Toiii-icrtiy TABLE OF CASES. 3fi,39,4I7,418, Tol|si;;iiail( 'J'liilmti Tri'iiiMuy Treiiipe Tifiilioliiie Riiss Tato Uny Umiciinrd Uiiawa Agricultural Tn ;i21. l]it'|iaM!iii'r exjK mncv C I'. l>'Kstiinaiivi r. Triiilcl V- Aiiii(jt I', 'iaron >'. llftidcrson V. i{(]Mli'au ''■ I'crkiiiH i". McLennan 'J'reM ler Ti'('.«ier Tnuleau Trudel (', Dawson 0. Laliatt Beau(;iieniin Bisi^on Cowie Maillonx I'l'iiiK'au A ntrors PAOK 420, 452 509, 570 703 592 sn- 409,415 ' 621 86, (108 260, 350, 4!»,H, 650 369, 55(; 8(;, 6,H;i 556 215 47,123,314 34 S 239, 3.17 726 247 K4 193 614 83 143 Trudel Trust and Trustees Truteau Tut'ts Tnustall i upper TurooKe 808 PAOB t'. Huval 32 "■V,'"V'' 160,571 "■•;'"','"" 203,321,556 r. .Siailacona Insurance Co. 16.S, 5^<3 V. MiKinniin ■i\ 'I'raljau lioan Co. (!. CasHiily " /•. Dupras " r. (inertin " i: J„neH " " V. Quintal " " r. Ruliort ol Montreal Turnpike Road v llaoust '•• <;ii.y of Montreal i\ Browrirji'i' r. (Juevrernont 428 86, 60M 6.) 7 .357,6 16 4, 574 6,sl 621 68 Turgeon Franer IlHinin;; litfinier Itioux Cdupul lieleLvro 237 636 730 2f.9 349 320 140, 429 241, 308 379 21, .386, 560 u 483 101 " Undorvvriter," The Union Bardf c. Kournier Union Bank of Lower Canada i: Ontario Bank 114, 339 „ ,, I'- Owcn.s 609 " t'. Walsh 5, 104, 729 Uni, nion Naviijation Co. v. ChriHtin " >'■ Couiliard " V. Macdouijall ,, ," , " t'. Rascony !3t. Joseph V. Lajtierre 17.3,314 172 170, 172,448,(154 172 69, lot), 482 173, Vailiancourt t). Collette Vajade v. Bellehumeur V. Chalut V. Delisle V. LangJois 36, 41, 71 2-<5, 287, 296, 306, V. Lebrun V. Raymond V. Dii'buc V. Picard V . Christin Vanaistyne v. Gray Vanasse v. McGreevy Vancourtland v. (ileaso'n V. Manjuis V. Auasant V. Renaud V. Jones V. Joluil! ''. 'Sliupe i'. Rvdcr I'. Bfaiu ." I'. Robert yeillet V. Thitn-auit Veillfuxy. Charest Vaiin ti Vallee « Valois Vandal Vandu8en Vanvleit Varennes Vasey Vauglmii Vantrin 203 139 613 428 , 279, 282, 333, 451, 752 728 294 297 209, 6,08 307, 308, (;2() 392,610 313 58, 84 6.3, 425 601 136, 337 208 32 11 603 676 623 162 Ventier v. Seguy Venlini v. Wan! Vcrniette v. Fontaine Vermilion v. Bergevin Veroneau v. Poupart " V. Sauve Versailles v. Paquet Vezina i\ Cole V. Oingras " V. Hearn " V. Lcfcbvre " V. Mclnries " t'. Midland V. New York Co. i". Sicotte V. Noiseaux " I'. Pontbriant Villeneuve v. La Societe de Cons V. Rolland V. Berioit V. Callaljan V. Browning t\ Corbeillu V. Symea Vien Vigneux Vincent Viasiere Voligny Life Insurance 158, 233 263, 13, 79, 584 135, .•i;)8 364 87 692 308 732 731 553 460 178, 4H8 692, 744 17 30, 307, 52, 320, 409 49 4(;8 318 477 260 488 , 191 676 664 203 809 TABLE OP CAHES. 810 w » ! Waillpiirli Wait vip. WiiMnm Walker Wall Walsli Ward Wariior WaHoii Maniilactiirin Watnoll ('. Ciilo " r. Grant " V. Ki'ller '' i\ Sam-icMi )>. Painchaiul V. Ij'lKistie r. M;i'iiiiaii c. Dflai-oMile r. l».>iitre V. I'owcll r. Sta(|;ic()iia Bank r. Swci't '. lI'iiiiiltDii Dovi'r r. Qiu'Ir'O lload TniPtees r. I'liiijM Bank r. l{iivini' r. V't'iitini ". ItcL'ina Co. 0. r I'AIJK 201) 23, Hlii ISO '2G2, r> 35,241, 50(1, 731, 744 5U; 320, (i:i2 113 17(1 377 31, l(i7 571 58, yi, 180. 203 Wlieeler White (iillllS Bain Hood Lediio l.itner Wh.vte GodlVe}' WliitHel I'. Huntingdon V. .Mackenzie (•• Well.s r. Merchants Bank 401) 411 413 402, 40(1, 743 58M 74, 283 430, 434 58 61,281 571 fi3 Whitman r. Corporation ot .Stanbridire 2.'U, 52'J, 587, 590 Whyte V- Bowie ;{<)1 " r. McArthur 072 Stuart 52, 680 Western Assurance Co., 402, 40G, 743 Wieklilfe r. Luke WiL'^ins t\ Morgan VVirke.-f I'. Beaudry " (', Marchaml Willet r. Larociiue " WilliamH,"The AVillianis r. Montrait " i: I'oulin Williftni.«on r. Kliind Wilson I'.VOK 430,459 18, 403 387,301, 751 24, no- 216 48(i 190, 591 4, (it'iO 617, 745 '". Brunei 628 " ('. Carnida Shippini; Co. 48;( " V. City ol' Montreal 417 " r. La 'Bamiue Ville Marie 417 " V. (Irand Trunk Uailwav 23(1,513,640 " V. La Sociole de Construction de Soulaiige.s 173,315 " V. Prevost OlO " t>. Rafter 88, 018, 02/ i\ Smart 671, 743 Windsor Hotel Co, c. Lat'ramhoiso 173 " r. Lewis 172 " y. Murphv 171 W;n,i;ale Chemical Co. r. Smith l:{7 Wiseman r. Canada Meat, etc., Co. 00 Wood c. Jlegina 200 _" r. Ste. .Marie 554 Woods r. Lajoie :\[ Woodwaril r. Allan I |4, 724 Workman r. Beattie 5, 715 " r. I'elo(|uin 242 " ('. Remiy 272 t'. 'i'he Herald Printing Co. 2'JO Worms cxp. Wdrthinf^ton v. .Faques Wright c. F.ister " 0. Heritalile .Sec " V Kane Wurlele r. Dinning r. Richard Wyatt r. Carslake " V. Levis it Kennebec Railway " r. Senecal WylJ ('. Jjiverpool cfe London it Globe In- surance Co. 7.'t Wylie ('. Lepage 4)19 " I'. Regina 215, lill Wyman i\ Greenshields 418,571, 627 320, 330, ;i;iO 044 00 ri'.ies 501 18:i, 570 374, 375, 395, 509. 512 Oil 112 o:i2 80 Young i\ Dental Association 254 " «. Smith 285 Yuile V. Simpson 230, 667, 745 Yule Corporation of Chambly Howard 122 208 Zernichon y. Hall z 132,616 I Zink exp. 328, 329 810 I'AOB 4:i!t, 4r)9 IH, 4!C 387, ;i!»l, -,-.1 21, 110- 2(0 4H(i 1!)SI, i)!)l 4, tiC!) 617, 71.-) (;28 >liippiii)» Co. 4S,( [oiitiviil 417 iieV ilk' Marie 417 Trunk Hailwav 2;ii;,oi:}, C40 e tie CoiiHtructioii ges 17,!, 315 i;i() 88, (ils, tit I 071, 743 train ljoii?e 'wi.s iirpliv '. Siiiitli It, etc., Co 173 172 171 137 (i!) U06 /$54 31 1 14, 724 G, 715 242 272 I Pi-iiiting Co. 2U0 321), 330, .339 044 OU ur.ic'fl 501 l.'*3, 570 374, 375, 395, 501). 512 Oil 112 lebcc Uaiiway 032 8ii mlon it Globe Iii- >. 73 469 215,311 418,571, 027 f Chambly 122 208 328, 329