IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I 1.25 m IIIIIM IIIU ■ 4 1.4 — 6" 11^ 12.2 12.0 1.8 1.6 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STRMT WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 . '' . ' ■ ' .' : ^f^ >^^^^^€/^i2S7^ BURGOYNE'S CAMPAIGN. JUNE— OCTOBER, 1777. JUSTICE TO SCHUYLER, d) The following article possesses interest at this moment, ( 1866 ) when BAMCROFT, in the ninth volume of his "History of the United States," has laid himself open to such deservedly severe attacks hy his depreciaMon of the personal character and military qualifications of Major General PHILIP SCHUYLER to whose Practical-Strategy the defeat of BURGOYNE was due. In lowering SCHUYLER, the historian not only threw a doubt upon the reliability of all his portraitures and the im- partiality of his judgment, but did great injustice to the State of New York, to whose yoemanry soldiers bred on the "Bloody Ground" — in the '-Flanders of America" — the overthrow of BURGOYNE must be chiefly attributed. Second to none — not even to WASHINGTON — in the purity of his patriotism; sacond only to WASHINGTON and to GREENE in his ac- complished generalship — one of the deepest investigators and clearest writers on our Revolutionary struggles has even claimed for SCHUYLER that he was the superior of the latter. J « j i 'l (1) fSKOROE H. MOORK, Esq, Llbmrian of the New York Historical Society, a gentleman better read in American History than nlmoBt any other in the country, remarked (26tii January, 1868) to Major WILL.VRD BULL.VRD, U. S. V., that he was not satisfied that " ANCHOR" had not written (referring to the preceding article) the best Defence of Schuyler which had yet appeared. 1'IV. 1 I ^/ To luisroprewMit SCHUYLKR is to di«honor the Empire 8tate, which in this " time that tried meiiH couls, " did more than its pi.rtinn of the duty, and bore more than its share of the burdens. No state suffered more than New York, for New York was more divided apiinst itself than any other colony. It was not only the arena of civil war, but of the bitterest fratra- eidal strife, and the horrors of Indian Warfare were sui>eradded U) those of a nominally civilized invasion which furnished, whetted, incited and subsidized the scali)inj>; knife ; this, too, not only for seven years. (1775,-81) but for over a hundred yeai-s previously. In the valley of the upper Hudson, the finest and best ap- pointed British army marshalled a«t of the American Revolution save one (Kings M..unt4.in) in prop.rtion to the luimbera engaged— and even the famous Bennington was m>t decided in Vermont, but ill the town of H..osic. in the county of Rensselaer, and StHt*! of New York, upon an affltient of tin; Hudson. lu lHti:i. the French Lieutenant Colonel M. J<)i,Y i)K. 8t. Vamer, published an •• Argumentative Hist^iry ( llistom- Rain- Hmw.v) of the Milit^.ry and I'olitieal operations of the Last War." which embraceil our llevi.lutionary Struggles, and which, when written, amounted to a prophecy. Translate his words: " In 1777 England agumented still mort' its force in America, until they numbmMl r>r.AI(MI men. This force is certainly double what was neces.sary to subjugate the whole of America in less than two years. All that was reiiuired was to .lispose thein ;,o as to be able to act advantagw.usly. This the English luiver knew how to do."' 3 These viewrt of the French dolone! cliwely corroborate those of the great German Tactical writer, von BIT LOW, traiinlated and published in the New York Hixtorlcal Magazine (ar 1865, pagcH 105, &c., 141, (see Army and Navy Journal, 111, 1865,-(>G) 302, 3d, &c. As soon as the season became favorable for the operations of the campaipless, indefatigable forgetfulness of self, and res«>lute laborioiisneKS — every thought of a first-class military mind concentrated iar the public good, regardless of private losses and pMl)lic misjiidgment of motives and actions, the heav- en-reaching, and thence force-deriving determination of an honest New-Netherland(n'. In the treatment experienced by SCHUYLER, we have a perfect type of HO()KER's at the hands of HALLECK, and his supersedure by MEADE, in July, IHGH. When GATES took the command BURGOYNE's tower was already tottering to its fall ; a comparatively slight efl'ort wius only neetled to push it over. This was what wonld havt been termed in our Great Civil War "l)u«h-wliacking" on a big scale. The shock was given and it fell in ruitn. It was tottering as the French Colonel predicted, not through the shock of arms, but through want of fiiod. The latter sapjwd its strength and undermined its efficiency. Before GATES appeared ( IDtli August) mor- ally and physically the work was done. Of all soldiei's the English most n-ipiire a full stomach, and BURGOYNE's were •7 empty. On the lOth and 1 1th of Aujrust BUROOYNE had been compelled to send off BAUM and BREYMAN to gather in food. August KUh this expedition was ntterly routed, not at Bennington, as usually stated, but at Wulloomscoick, (Sanco- iek Mills) within the State of New York. BURGOYNE now had to depend upon supplies drawn from England, by way of Que- bec and Lake Champlain. Three days aflcr Bennington, thirteen days after Oriskany, and simultaneously with the relief of Fort Stanwix (this relief due alone to SCHUYLER's firmness) GATES superseded SCHUYLER, and assumed command nominally of the Northern Army — in the latter part of Au- gust; Thatcher would lead the reader to suppose about the HOth. Arnold hud been already detached to the relief of Fort Stan- wix as soon as it« danger had become known, about the 7th. After the toils of five weeks — toils due entirely to the engi- neering ability of SCHUYLER— BURGOYNE, on the 30th September, moved forward again. Then it was GATES, act- ting under the spur of ARNOLD, presented the barrier of arms. On the 24th September the Americans had already cut BURGOYNE's lines of c ^ .'ft >'>6 ^T- • - c'fc'. * > -ys - -'.t H^~ ,C/n >#,«■ <>>■ yvfi • ^ii ./ if.".' -*/•