<\y. o^^^ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 4 // {/ :/. % ^ t/j 1.0 I.I 1.25 i^ 1^ lllllio 1.8 1-4 IIIIII.6 ^^ <^ /a ^l '^A y >^ PhotoL Scienjces Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 872-4503 V5% CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHJNA/ICIVIH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked below. D n n Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur I I Covers damaged/ Couverture endommagie Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaurde et/ou pellicul6e Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque Coloured maps/ Cartes giographiques en couleur □ Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue oi black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) □ Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur D Bound with other material/ Reli6 avec d'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La reliure serr^e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion le long de la marge intirieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela dtait possible, ces pages n'ont pas it6 filmies. Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl^mentaires: L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a it6 possible de se procurer. Les d6tai! dthate'in. t^a Cuus'sudon; it was not even brought before v> uni.i! afirr ihefulioivuiy ir. 1 noy; "proceed to the consideration of the Co.istit.uion, &c " Surely here was a flagrant departure from '.lie terms of ihe circular, on the authority of which the djlega'.es were elected and in accordance with which we all — your I^orJship — your Clergy — and the Laity — were assembled. We were summoned "to agrei'. uvon a Coiiddaiio>\" and only to "resolve" ourselves "into the Synod" should there be "such agreement." When I rose in my place as .Senior Aichdeacon, as well as the Senior Priest in the Diocese, to protest against t lis departure from the circular of Feby. 25th, 1874, your Lordship, as Presi dent, over-ruled- me. Of course I submitted to your ruling, but I mean no discourtesy when 1 say — I could not see its justice —nor have I ever acquiesced in it. Here, then, I maintain is enough to invalidate this present "Synod." But I ask your Lordship's further attention to this circular: We were called together lo agree upon a Constitution, and if there should he Huch a(,reem<'nt. fo re.«)lve OHrselve!< into the Ircssed 5riiish Ipower bd, but fpon a :nt to Synod. On these terms, and on these terms only, were delegates elected; on these terms, and on these terms only, the Conven- tion met. Your Lordship saw fit at the last moment to invert the terms of the circular, i. e., to set aside the conditions on which the elections of 1874 were conducted, and on which the clergy re- sponded to your summons, and you called upon us first to resolve ours uves into Synod ar,d then to proceed to the con- sideration of the ('onstitution, the condition of agreement bciiig abandoned. But even admitting that you had a right thus to invert the terms of the circular of Feby. 25th, 1874, 1 do nut .see iiow you could claim a right to set aside its conditions; a; id so I ask were those conditions adhered to ? Was there ucli agreement ? DidiacUy nut. h; I'oistituiion (p.p. 25-28 of Report) contains XVI. Aruclct, of which Arts I. II. & VII. involve distinct (Jhurch ■ l^ iiicij les, and and on no o/k; of tlie.ie Arddeis was there agree- ni lit. ! he VIII which involves no principle, merely declar- iiij ih.' ma.xiinum number of delegates, was passed, it i.s true, wuho t a dis.,e.itient voice; but no one who recalls the painful .SwCiic when a detnand was made by your Lordship for a vote by oideib on that Article — when all your clergy kept their seats silent y abstaining from a conflict on such a question, and all the Liiiy urged again and again that if the vote by orders was pressed, then "oyiiod" must then and there have come to an end. No one, 1 repeat, who recalls this, can say there was agreemenl here, and I would remind your Lordship how easily I could then have brought "Synod" to a close, had i but given a solitary "Aye" in support of your demand; but I felt that while ready to contend f ir a principle to the very utmost, I could not accept a mere victory. There was then no such agreemenl as the circular of Feb, 25, 1874, laid down as the condition on which "Synod" should be called into existence. My conclusion, then, is this, —This present so-called "Synod" is not a Synod according to the true constitution of a Synod; and even supposing that no exception could be taken to the wording 8 of its constitution, yet there is that in its origin which deprives it of all claim to the name. My position is— not that I refuse to join the Synod, and to work with it—but that there is no Synod for me to join, or to work with. I hope that, after 16 years of cordial co-operalion with my Diocesan, I need not assure your Lordship of my unaltered and unalterable reverence for your Office, of my respect for you personally and my ready obedience to you as my Bishop. I remain, my dear Lord Bishop, Faithfully yours, CHARLES T. WOODS, Rector of Hcly Trinity Church, New Westminster, And Archdeaconof Columbi?. deprives [cl, and to ^in, or 10 J with my (unaltered :t for you IP ;ter, Hubia. A few words are ncccssarj' to explain why a letter written in June, 1876, is not published — if it were to be published at all, till January, 1877. I thought it well to await the jjublication of the "Report" of the piocecdingb in July. That "Report" did not reach me till the 6lh inst., and to-day 1 place tiie letter in the hands of the printer. It may be a matter of small moment to my brother clergy, or to tlie laity ol the Church of England, whcHher or no 1 lake any part in this so called "Synod." It is not a matter of small moment to me, tliat my action and the reasons for it nhould be misrepresented or misunderstood. To avoid such misunderstanding or misrepresentation, I wrote the letter. To correct them — knowing that they exist — I publish it. C. T.W. The Rectory, New Westminster, January 8, 1877.