IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT^3) 
 
 / 
 
 O 
 
 
 L^ 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 
 2.2 
 
 « ^ illllM 
 
 1.8 
 
 I™ 1^ 
 
 % 
 
 ^ 
 
 o-^ 
 
 m 
 
 
 e: 
 
 
 .y;^j> - 
 
 ^'j" 
 
 o 
 
 0/% 
 
 /A 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 
 ^v- 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STttEET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY. 14580 
 
 (716) 672-450S 
 
 ■^^ 
 

 ^6 
 % 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CiHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 
 4 
 
 ^ 
 
Technical ^nd Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reprod:iction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 v/ 
 
 
 n 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommagoe 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 ouverture restaurde et/ou pelliculde 
 
 n Cover title missing/ 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 □ Coloured maps/ 
 Cartes g6ographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 ere de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 □ Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Plan( 
 
 iches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli^ avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion !e long de la marge intdrieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout^es 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 film^es. 
 
 L'institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliogrdphiqun, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvont exiger une 
 modification dans la m6thode normale de filmage 
 sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. 
 
 n 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 n 
 □ 
 
 Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur ' 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 Pages restorer) and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaurdes et/ou pellicul^es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d6color6es, tachet^es ou piqu^es 
 
 Pages detached/ ' 
 
 Pages d^tachees 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 duality of print varies/ 
 Quality indgale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel supplementaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible ' 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partieltement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 film6es d nouveau de fa^on it 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 □ 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppldmentaires; 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film6 au taux de reduction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 
 
 
 16X 
 
 
 
 
 20X 
 
 
 
 
 24X 
 
 
 
 
 28X 
 
 
 
 
 32X 
 
 
ails 
 
 du 
 
 difier 
 
 Line 
 
 lage 
 
 The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 National Library of Canada 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming con';ract specifications. 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grSce d la 
 gdndrositd de: 
 
 Bibliothdque nationale du Canada 
 
 Les images suivantes ont dt6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetd de l'exemplaire filmd, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimde sont filmds en commengant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont filmds en commen^ant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol —h^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning 'END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles solvents apparaitra sur la 
 dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon te 
 cas: le symbole — »- signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbole V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratio^i. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 film6s d des taux de reduction diffdrents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre 
 reproduit en un seul clichd, il est filmd d partir 
 de Tangle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche d droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images n^cessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mdthode. 
 
 rata 
 
 lelure. 
 
 J 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
k1^ (^ 
 
 ■A 
 
 W- v , 
 
 '(?>^ 
 
 / 
 
 a?ia:E 
 
 INFERIOR MAGISTRATES; 
 
 OR, 
 
 Legal Pluralism in Ontario, 
 
 BY 
 
 R. J. WICKSTEED, 
 
 Barrister, &c. 
 
 '• The dearest issue of his practice and of his old experience ''—Shak. 
 
 I 
 
 1/ 
 
 ■)^V \ 
 
 . 7 '^^ 
 
 i 
 
\fJS 
 
THE 
 
 INFERIOR MAGISTRATES 
 
 -OR- 
 
 LEGAL PLURALISM IN ONTARIO 
 
 Previous to tli(^ '^otli Marcli, 1886, b}^ the Statute Law of 
 Ontario, no person could be a Police Magistrate, or Justice of 
 the Peace, during the time he continiuMl to practice as an 
 Attorn(\y or Solicitor, in any Court whatever : except such 
 l)ractising Attorney or SoHcitor was at tlie same time a meml)er 
 of Her Majesty's Executive Council, or a Judge of any of the 
 Supreme Courts of Law or Eipiity, or a County Judge, or Her 
 Majesty's Attorney General, or one of Her Majesty's Counsel 
 in the Law, or a Mayor, Alderman, Reeve, or Deputy-Reeve of 
 any Municipality. [R. S. O. c. 71, s. s. 5, 22 and c. 72, s. 4.] 
 
 In Tlie Laic Journal, of September 1st, 1885, appeared a 
 letter by the author, on the dis(iualifications of Police Magis- 
 trates and Justices of the Peace, followed in the succeeding 
 number byfiu'ther correspondence from other lawyers. 
 
 On the 22nd March appeared the first edition of this essay. 
 
 The Toronto Globe, of the 27th March, says, referring to 
 this open essay : — "Almost simultaneously with the appearance 
 "■ of Mr. Wicksteed's letter, the grievance, of which he justly 
 " complained, ceased in a great measure to exist. By a clause 
 " in Mr. Mowat's bill for further improving the law, passed at 
 " the late session of the Legislature, it is provided that no 
 
V 
 
 ' ' Police Magistrate, and no })artner or clerk of any Police 
 "Magistrate, shall act as Agent, Solicitor or Counsel in any 
 " cause, matter, prosecution or proceeding of a criminal nature, 
 " or in any case wliich may be investigated or tried before a 
 " Magistrate or Justice of the Peace." 
 
 But the Globe did not tell its subscribers that the principle 
 of which I complained does still exist, and that in an aggravated 
 form,— thanks to An Act for Further Improving the Lair, 
 (1886). What I complained of was that in Ontario, while 
 generally speaking, no Attorney or Solicitor could be a Justice 
 of the Peace : yet there were exce])tions to this rule, whereas 
 there ought to be none. Now, to further improre the law on 
 this point, Mr. Mowat, expressly enacts, 49 V., c. 16, s. 18, that 
 any Attorney or Solicitor who is a Police Magistrate, shall be 
 an exception to the wholesome rule I want to make universal. 
 
 A Police Magistrate, in tlie eyes of the law is nothing but 
 two Justices of the Peace rolled into one, who is paid to see, 
 among other things, that the by-laws of his city or town are 
 kept inviolate. 
 
 Tills absurdity now exists, therefore, under the Ontario 
 Statutes, viz., that a practising Attorney or Solicitor cannot be 
 a Justice of the Peace, but he may hold the office and do the 
 duties of two Justices of the Peace. Ontario says it would be 
 inconvenient, (using the euphonious expression of an English 
 Chancellor speaking on this point) to allow a practising 
 Attorney to act as a Justice of the Peace, who, in most cases, 
 would be coupled with a layman Avho would counteract the 
 obvious inconvenience. But it is an improvement in the law to 
 appoint a practising Attorney to be a Police Magistrate, who is 
 a Corporation sole, representing and having the powers of a 
 Bench of Justices, whose inconvenient tendencies to benefit his 
 own practice at the expense of the blind goddess whose servant 
 he ought to be, are uncontrolled by partnership with a man or 
 men not so tempted. 
 
 ^^ 
 
 mt 
 
^5 
 
 mt 
 
 It is all the more important to preserve, without exception, 
 the (lolden Rule, that no practising- Attcjrney shall be a Justice 
 of tlie Peace or Police ^Magistrate, in view of " the dangerous 
 increase of summary juiisilictiou," as Samuel Warren calls it. 
 
 We ask is there any reason for these exceptions? Why 
 strongly har the gate, and yet remove some of the palings from 
 the fence c«mnected with it? Why allow a wolf to enter the fold 
 of the Juiliciary, because he can clothe himself in the sheepskin 
 of anyone of several oMces? The rule is a good one, the reason 
 for it is good ; vvliy defeat its object by exceptiinis directly 
 opposed to the law of the leading countries in the world ? 
 Why does Ontario alone retain this unjust and impolitic plu- 
 rality of employments under the guise of exceptions ? Let us 
 examine : 1st — The laws and jurisprudence of various coun- 
 tries on the subject of the (puilitications of Judges and Justices 
 of the Peace ; and 2nd — Consider the reasons whicli actuated 
 their Legislators, Judges and Jurisconsults in framing sucli 
 enactments, rendering such decisions, or holding such oi)inions. 
 
 In England or Wales no person shall be cai)[ible of Ijecom- 
 ing or being a Justice of tlie Peace for any county in which 
 he shall practice and carry on the profession or business of an 
 Attorney, Solicitor, etc. (84-35 Vict., 1871, c. 18). The same 
 disqualification for stipendiary magistrates (see 2() and 27 Vict. , 
 c. 97). It is true that by 18 Geo, 2, c. 20 (Imp.) there are per- 
 sons excepted from the general rule of 5 Geo. 2, c. 18, by which 
 latter Act Attorneys in England are incapacitated from 
 being Justices of the Peace so long as they continue in the 
 business and practice of an Attorney — but the persons are 
 either those who could not by any possibility be Attorneys, or 
 if Attorneys, could not find time or opportunity to act as Jus- 
 tices of the Peace. In Scotland, under 19 and 20 Vict., c. 48, 
 sec. 4: "Any Writer, Attorney, Procurator or Solicitor who 
 may be elected to the office of Magistrate or Dean of Guild of 
 
««;^ 
 
 I 
 
 any Burgh, tho Magistrates or Dean of (iuild of which are ex 
 offioiis Justices of tlie Peace by virtue of their election to such 
 offices, shall, so long as he liokls any such oftice. he entitled to 
 act as a Justice of the Peace, provided he intimates to the Clerk 
 of the Peace for the County, in which any such Burgh is situ- 
 ated, that he and any partner or partners in husin-'ss with him 
 cease to practise before any Justice of the Peace C'ourt in such 
 county, so long as he continues to hold such office as aforesaid ; 
 and it shall not be lawful for him or them thereafter, and 
 during his continuance in office so to practise. 
 
 By the laws of France, the functions of a Justice of the 
 Peace are incompatible with those of a Mayor, Prefect and 
 Sub-Prefect, Councillor of the Prefecture, Councillor at the 
 Royal Court, Bailiff, any employee in the C/Ustoms. Post Office, 
 Public Accountant. Ecclesiastic, Notary, Advocate, and paid 
 Teacher. If tlie person who has been appointed a Justice of 
 the Peace is engaged in inconipatii)le enii)loyment, or duties, 
 he is obliged to give up such employment or duties within ten 
 days from notice of his appointment, under j'ain of having his 
 appointment revoked. It is true that in France these Justices 
 are salaried — but so are our Police Magistrates — and it might 
 be better to increase the fees of the Justices of the Peace if they 
 were deprived of holding incompatilde offices as they are in 
 France. (See Bioche, Dicti(jnnaire a ol. 4.)" 
 
 In the United States of America, Justices of the Peace are 
 elected by the people for four years, and they may be removed 
 in due manner by those who elected them. In this way all 
 malversations of office or other irregularities ai'e easilv cured 
 and remedied. This four years' probation in office is a very 
 useful provision, for "we must not, upon supposition only, 
 admit judges deficient in their office, for so they would never 
 do right : nor on the other side, must we admit them unerring 
 in their judgment, for so they would never do anything w^rong." 
 (See Coventry & Hughes' Digest, p. 833.) 
 
 J 
 
 \ 
 
 i 
 
«,l 
 
 I 
 
 1* 
 
 Let us now consider the reasons whicli nrtiiatecl tli»' fram- 
 ers of the forej^oin;; enactnieiit>. Why is tlie eumulalion of 
 employment forliiibU'n under iill free .i;overnuirnts V Tlie gen- 
 eral reason a<i,ainst the phirality of <>jiipl()ynients in tlic hands. 
 of a single person is thattliismono^xdy is unjust and impoHtie. 
 By heaj)in^ ujum a small number of persons the ohjeets of 
 general desire, you deprive so many individuals of a portion of 
 enjoyment, and you take away from i)ul)lic competition so 
 numy rewards whieh might bea]>[)lieahle to the encouragement 
 of true merit. Heap three j)()rtions upon a privileged favorite, 
 you do not triple the enjoyment which each i)ortion separately 
 would have given him ; and above all you are very far from 
 producing the same amount of satisfaction as if you had ad- 
 mitted three persons to a share in the division. But there aie 
 more conclusive reasons agjiinst uniting any other employment 
 with that of the Judge. 1st — The good of the public service. 
 The obligation to attend daily at the Court or Chambers is 
 incompatible with any other jmblic duty. If he is not always 
 engaged as a Judge, it is necessary that he should always be 
 ready so to act. Give him other duties, the parties Jire exposed 
 to delays, and justice to the frittering away of evidence. If 
 your Judges have ])lenty of time for other business, they are 
 too numerous or their jurisdiction is too limited ; you may 
 learn from this that your judicial establishment is on too ex- 
 travagant a scale. When the cumulation of two em[)loynients 
 is permitted, of which either is suiUcient to occupy the time of 
 a single individual, the law ought to explain and set forth 
 which of the two does it intend that the duties shall be ne- 
 glected. 2nd — The danger to uprightness or the reputation fo^* 
 uprightness. All emi)loyments entail a diversity of social 
 relations and combinations of interests ; all connections are 
 sources of partiality. It is possible that the probity of a Judge 
 might not suffer from these things, but his reputation might 
 
6* 
 
 suffer and the confidenoe in his judgments will be weakened. 
 (See Benthain, Organisation Judiciaire.) 
 
 "In Jure non debet fieri aeeeptio personam in," and "A 
 good Judge slioidd do notbing from his own arbitrary will, or 
 from the dictates of his private wishes ; but he should i)ro- 
 nounce according to law and Justice." — {Coke.) " Le devoir 
 d'lni Jugeconsis^e a rendre la Justice sans avoir egard aaucune 
 recommandation, &c/'— (Ferriere Diet. vo. Juge.) 
 
 Plato writes : — "A Judge sits in the Judgment Seat, not to 
 administer laws !)y favor, but to decide by fairness ; and he 
 has taken an oath that he will not gratify his friends, but 
 determine with a strict regard to law." 
 
 Drydeu sings ; — 
 
 " My secret wishes would my clioice ilecide : 
 But open .justice bends to neither side." 
 
 Samuel Warren, in his law studies, very truly observes : — 
 " Justices of the Peace, in almost all cases, are (dothed with 
 power to hear and dc^terniine — combining in themselves the 
 several powers of a Judge, a Jury and Court of Equity : and 
 the manner in which their arduous duties are discharged, is 
 watched by the public with unfaltering vigilance — supi)lying a 
 pov/erful stimulus to a zealous and able exercise of their 
 important functions." 
 
 Would it not be well if the Provincial Government w^ere 
 to exercise more discretion in the selection of men to fill this 
 impoi'tant office, whose Jurisdiction has, in late years, been 
 extended very far beyond the bounds originally assigned to it. 
 and adhered to for centuries ? 
 
 Would it not be well also if the persons nominated to this 
 office w^ere to examine themselves, before accepting, in order 
 to ascertain if they are acquainted with the duties of a Judge, 
 and if they are prepared to carry them out in the high minded 
 manner advocated by the old Jurisconsult Pigeau in his 
 Procedure Civile ? [Vol. 1 p. 361] : — 
 
 i# 
 
f 
 
 '• The JiidgeH are the mouthi)iece8 of tlie laws : Uke theiii^ 
 they ou^lit to punish and ^)ardon, without lovin*; or hatin<^ : 
 Hke them tliey ou^lit to he inaccessihle to every feelinjz; not in 
 accord with those of rif?i<l Justice. 
 
 "Sucli are in sliort tiie <luties of Ma^ijistrates ; hut they are 
 men, and, consequently, subject to all the weaknesses of 
 humanity ; and to how many dangerous rocks do they not 
 expose themselves ? 
 
 "In order to steer clear of them, the Judge ouj^ht to consider 
 himself as formed of two persons, the Judge and the man. The 
 latter he ought to look upon as a dangerous enemy, who, hy a 
 thousand wiles, seeks to take the former by surprise, by 
 persuading him that they are but one, in that way confounding 
 his motions with those of the Judge ; and endeavouring to 
 make him see and decide through the eyes and feelings of the 
 man what ought to be seen and decided through the eyes and 
 sentiments of the law. 
 
 ''The Magistrate, convinced of the necessity for making this 
 distinction, examines, on the one side, what are his duties, 
 what ought he to do to be permeated by rule, to be indent i tied 
 with it, and to be in some sort, infallil)le as it is. He examines, 
 on the other hand, what are the frailties of man ; and con- 
 stantly kee])ing this double image before his eyes, when he 
 puts on the person of the Judge, he makes a complete subtrac- 
 tion of that of the man, or if he pays any attention to it, it is 
 only to repress by means of the consideration of the duties of 
 the former, the attempts which w^ould be made upon it by 
 the pride and corruption of the second. 
 
 "But it is not sufficient thus to know the proper bounds for 
 these two persons, and to intend to keep them within such 
 bounds ; the Magistrate will not be able to ])revent the man 
 from endeavouring to overleap them, and mingle his influence 
 with that of the law. The love of justice, knowlndge, firmness, 
 
8 
 
 nttimtion and f^reatness of KiovA, are the guards which we ouglit 
 to place between these, so conflicting, powers, in order to 
 oppose to thtit of the man a force wliich will hinder hiiu from 
 making an attack upon the domain of the law. 
 
 •' Imbued with a love of justice as well as of law, the true 
 Magistrate sees nothing but through its agency : -"•:. raits only 
 the genius of the Legir^lation ; and not only does he put aside 
 all the suggestions coming from blood relationship, interest, 
 self-love and pride, but he even makes an entire sacrifice of his 
 own o[)ini()ns when they are o])posed to this love of justice. He 
 looks ujiou justice as so nuu'h property entrusted to him. which 
 he ought in conse^pience to distrilnite to each person in the 
 proiK)»rion iudicated by the Legislator. He knows that he 
 cannot inflict upon justice the slightest injury without com- 
 mit ling sacrilege ; and it never enters his mind to c promise 
 with the rule of right, lO seek a mean l)etween vice and virtue, 
 to make an unholy alliance with this rule, and grant favors 
 when he has only the ])ower to render justice. 
 
 "'Acknowledging w ithout difficulty that the intellect of man 
 is limited, that his own ])ersonal experience, however extensive 
 it may be, is infinitely inferior to the united experience of those 
 men who have ])receded him, he consults that knowledge which 
 results from the latter. This knowledge causes him to find in 
 the spirit of the law a decision conformable to the immutable 
 rules of justice, and by this means causes him to avoid the 
 deceits of the senses, the illusions of the imagination, the error 
 of prejudice, and the seductive influence of example, all reefs 
 upon wiiich he might be dashed if he only relied u{)on himself. 
 
 ''Firm as the law^ itself, he decides always as she does ; and 
 favour, tlie prejudices of fainily ties, of interest, and those 
 which spring from disposition and temperament, have no 
 influence on his soul. On account of a continual mistrust of 
 these forces, and the greatest vigilance over himself, reason 
 
 
 I 
 
 ■; 
 
 ^, 
 
I 
 
 
 ■; 
 
 ever dominates his mind and his heart. She examines such 
 promptings at their birth, unravels their nature, follows them 
 in their progress, and keeps them within their proper bounds. 
 Attentive as the law itself he gives his decision when she 
 herself would have done so ; he gives to the examination of 
 the matter that degree of attention below which it would have 
 been dangerous to have passed judgment, and beyond which 
 to defer to give justice would have been to refuse it. By her 
 assistance he sees the matter grow, follows its growth, in order 
 to cut it short when it has reached the real point of maturity ; 
 and by this course avoids presenting to the parties the prema- 
 ture and bitter fruit of a blameworthy haste, or the backward 
 and juiceless fruit of indolence. 
 
 '* It is by the practice and union of all these precautions that 
 the Magistrate opposes to the haughty and intractable spirit of 
 man, the ever sure and infallible rule of the Jaw. Strengthened 
 by these virtues, the Magistrate, like a frowning rock which 
 throws far back the waves which the irritated floods have 
 hurled against it, remains firm and immoveable in the midst of 
 the shock of passions which hem him in, and which desire to 
 bury him beneath their efforts. 
 
 ^ * ' Such is the conduct of Magistrates who are animated by a 
 sense of their duties." 
 
 See also Guyot (liepertoire vo. Juge), who thus writes : 
 *' One of the most necessary qualifications for a Judge is im- 
 partiality. Before giving an opinion in any matter whatsoever, 
 he ought to assure himself that there does not exist in the 
 recesses of his heart either passion or private affect i m for 
 either of the parties. The ancients, in representing Themis 
 with a bandage over her eyes and a balance in her hand, have 
 given us a just idea of the true character of a Judge. It is in 
 order to avoid the effects of hatred or friendship, which would 
 not fail to incline this balance, that the Act called Recusation 
 takes place. A righteous Judge will not wait until he is threap 
 
10 
 
 ened with Recusation before signifying his determination to 
 abstain from pronouncing judgment in any case whatsoever, 
 because there may be grounds for Recusation unknown to the 
 parties interested. Nobody knows as well as he does if he is in 
 his mind more disposed towards one of the parties than the 
 other — if he does not still cherish some old grudge. One is so 
 inclined to find good the cause of the person one esteems ; one 
 is so greatly disposed to believe that he is unjust or guilty for 
 whom one has an aversion, that in undertaking to judge be- 
 tween them a man often runs the risk of committing an act of 
 injustice without intending it. The Judge should, for these 
 reasons, be very cautious, and probe his heart to its depths be- 
 fore giving his opinion in a matter in which the parties are 
 known to him." 
 
 A writer in the North American Review (vol. 57), thus ably 
 expresses the same idea : " The breath of an imputation can- 
 not obscure the mirror of justice. And this immunity is 
 essential to the working of the system, and to the preservation 
 of that public confidence in the judicial tribunals, which is the 
 surest guarantee of public order. The judges must not only be, 
 but seem just. The character which they bear is a thing of 
 quite as much importance for the common weal as the intrinsic 
 equity of their proceedings. It is little for me that a man at a 
 distance, of whom I never heard before, is defrauded of his due 
 in the Courts. But it is much for me to feel the assurance, 
 that, if my person or property is ever wrongfully attacked, I 
 shall find a just and powerful protector in the Law. Such an 
 assurance conduces much to the security and happiness of life, 
 though one may never have o< jasion to invoke the aid of this 
 strong champion. We say t^ at all temptations are removed 
 as far as practicable ; for it cannot be denied that, even in this 
 independent and honorable station, an avaricious judge may, if 
 he chooses, contaminate his fingers with base bribes, and sell 
 the judgment amd his own integrity, But those who lay stress 
 
 I 
 
 1' 
 
 ^ I 
 
 ■■1 
 
11 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 t 
 
 
 upon this danger show that they have little knowledge of 
 human nature. The gross temptation of a bribe may not allur® 
 a man to a flagrant violation of his oath, though the secret 
 promptings of self-interest, the desire of pleasing a powerful 
 friend, the hope of obtaining a re-appointment to a lucrative 
 office, may bias his reason by insensible degrees, and finally 
 lead to a judgment as iniquitous as if it had been purchased in 
 Court. Virtue is usually sapped and mined, not taken by storm. 
 Put a man out of reach of these insidious temptations, who do 
 not call upon him to sacrifice his honor and integrity at once 
 and with a full consciousness of what he is doing, but which 
 beset and perplex the mind with the prospect of great ultimate 
 good to be obtained by trifling and gradual deviations from the 
 straight path — put him away, we say, from these cunning 
 enticements, and he will angrily repel the shameless rogue who 
 comes in the broad light of day to buy his conscience. When 
 passion, or avarice, or ambition is tugging at the heart strings 
 a man becomes a sophist to himself, and will try all the wiles 
 of casuistry in order to varnish over the crime, and give it the 
 poor semblance of virtue. Anyone can resist ApoUyon, when 
 he comes in his proper shape, with horns and hoof, or as a 
 grovelling snake ; but the cunning Devil appears as a beautiful 
 woman, or a judicious friend, and the poor dupe clasps him to 
 his bosom and is entangled in the snare. Now the practice of 
 the Courts abounds with dangers of the very class which we 
 have here described. Perplexed and difficult cases are contin- 
 ually arising, in which the rights of the respective parties are 
 separated by the difference of a hair. So evenly does the mat- 
 ter lie between them, so doubtful is the rule of law to be ap- 
 plied to such an obscure and intricate question, that all the 
 acumen of a sharp and vigorous intellect can hardly determine 
 on which side equity and legal authority incline. Let self- 
 interest, in the mind of the judge, put a feather into the bal- 
 ance, and it will turn the scale. He must be a poor sophist, in 
 
 I 
 
12 
 
 so nice a case, who cannot blind himself so far as to believe 
 that justice actually requires that decision which is most ac- 
 cordant with his own feelings and ulterior views.' 
 
 Shakespeare, tradition says from personal experience, puts 
 the following into the mouth of one of his characters ; — 
 
 *' You &re mine ener.jy, I make my challenge, — 
 You shall not be my Judge." 
 
 In "a discourse on the past history, present state, and 
 future prospects of the law," by Judge Joseph Story, it is 
 written ; — "Men, for the most part, are willing to submit to 
 the laws when faithfully and impartially administered. If 
 they are satisfied that the Judges are incorruptible, they 
 acquiesce in their decisions, even when they suspect them to 
 be erroneous, as the necessary homage by which their own 
 rights and liberties are permanently secured." 
 
 The duties of the Magistrates were laid down in no ambig- 
 uous language by the ancient Roman law : "Rationibus non 
 precibus, judices vinci debent." "Judex non debet clementior 
 esse lege." "Nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa." 
 " Ne quis in sua causa judicet, vel jus sibi dicat." " Nemo sibi 
 jus dicere debet, in re enim propria iniquum est judicare." 
 "Judex non potest injuriam sibi datam punire," etc. 
 
 Under the old English statute, 18 Edward 3, stat. 4, the 
 following was the oath of the Justices of the Peace — which it 
 would be well to revive in the present day : " Ye shall swear 
 that well and lawfully ye shall serve our lord the King and his 
 people in the office of justice ; and that ye shall do equal law 
 and execution of right to all his subjects, rich and poor, with- 
 out having regard to any person ; and that ye take not, by 
 yourself or by other, privily nor apertly, gift nor reward of 
 gold nor silver, nor of any other thing which may turn to your 
 profit, unless it be meat or drink, and that of small value, of 
 any man that shall have plea or process hanging before you, as 
 long as the same process shall be so hanging, nor after for the 
 
 '[■ 
 
 r 
 
 1 
 
f 
 
 13 
 
 t 
 
 h 
 
 same cause ; and that ye take no fee as long as ye shall be 
 justice, nor robes of any man great or small, but of the King 
 himself ; and that ye shall give none advice nor counsel to no 
 man great or small, in no case where the King % party. And 
 that ye, by yourself, nor by other, privily nor apertly, main- 
 tain any plea or quarrel hanging in the King's Court or else- 
 where in the country. And that ye deny to no man common 
 right, by the King's letters, nor none other man's, nor for none 
 other cause ; and in case any letters come to you contrary to 
 law, that ye do nothing by such letters but certify tlie King 
 thereof, and proceed to execute the law notwithstanding the 
 same letters. And that ye shall do and procure the profit of 
 the King and of his crown, with all things wlie^o ye may rea- 
 sonably do the same. And in case ye be xiom henceforth found 
 in default in any of the faults iforesaid, ye shall be at the 
 King's will of body, lands and g:oG Is, thereof to be done as shall 
 please him. As God help you end a!l saints." 
 
 In more modern times we tin'l Couchot writing in the 
 following manner in his " Praticien Universel" (Paris, 1747) : 
 "When you are fully confirmed as a Judge, you must shew 
 respect unto decency in your habits, and be assiduous and ever 
 ready to render justice in the places and at the times custom- 
 ary, receive no presents, judge according to the laws, and 
 never act apart from them in order to give your private opin- 
 ion, supply the deficiences due tc' the ignorance of the attorneys 
 and the parties, and never abuse your authority, listen with 
 patience to the barristers, read their writings, and punish with 
 severity those who speak falsely." 
 
 In the Canada Law JouRNiiL, of the 15th September, 1885, 
 there appeared a letter containing the following sentence : — 
 '* If there be any evil in permitting barristers and solicitors to 
 act as police or stipendiary magi strates the general public seem 
 not to have found it out as they have not complained of it.'' 
 
14 
 
 ' 
 
 But the force of this statement and remonstrance is completely 
 deadened by the (almost) certainty that it was written by the 
 partner-in-law of a police magistrate, penned by a lawyer who 
 openly practiSfes with the " beak" in civil cases, and who, no 
 doubt, advises their clients to appeal for justice to the petty 
 criminal court over which his partner presides. Opposed to 
 this interested letter I have the honest and direct testimony of 
 many lawyers and laymen who state that the simultaneous 
 holding by one person of the two offices of lawyer and judge is 
 incompatible with decency, and they ought to be separated. 
 Besides, the general public referred to most largely consists of 
 the poor and laboring classes who have not the time or money 
 to complain, but bow in compulsory silence to the decisions of 
 Janus- Magistratus. Should this my pamphlet fail to move the 
 Provincial Government, I shall forward a petition to the Legis- 
 lature praying for what I do herein, — and I am certain that it 
 will be found to be signed, if not by the general public, at least 
 by the public in general. 
 
 It might appear that an honest magistrate was fully pro- 
 tected by the law from the violence of disappointed suitors ; 
 and that honest people were protected from the giving of 
 unrighteous judgments by partial justices of the peace. For 
 Lord Mansfield, C. J. said : " No justice of the peace ought to 
 suffer for ignorance where the heart is right : on the other 
 hand, where magistrates act from undue, corrupt or indirect 
 motives they are always punished by this court. (Queen's 
 Bench)." And Abbott C. J. declared : "In all cases of an 
 application for a criminal information against a magistrate, for 
 anything done by him in the exercise of the duties of his office, 
 the question has always been, not whether the act done might, 
 upon a full and mature investigation, be found strictly right, 
 but from what motive it had proceeded ; whether from a 
 dishonest, oppressive or corrupt motive (under which descrip- 
 tion, fear and favor may generally be included), or from mistake 
 
 
 < 
 
15 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 or error : in the former case alone theyWve become the objects 
 of punishment. To punish as a criminal a person who in the 
 gratuitous exercise of a public trust, may have fallen into error 
 or mistake, belongs only to the despotic ruler of an enslaved 
 people, and is wholly abhorrent from the jurisprudence of this 
 kingdom." 
 
 And in Fisher's Digest, Vol. 4, page 1182, we find a decision 
 that " Any direct pecuniary interest, however small, in the 
 matter of enquiry, disqualifies a magistrate." 
 
 Now the temptation to ' ' act from undue, corrupt, or indirect 
 motives " is very feeble in the case of the single-barrelled J. P. , 
 but very strong, in fact irresistible, in the case of the double- 
 barrelled magistrate. The latter is a man who is obsequious- 
 ness itself towards his neighbors when practising as a solicitor, 
 but brusque, insolent and unjust when dealing from the Bench 
 with those, or the interests of those, whose names are not in his 
 office ledger. Besides it is very hard to prove undue, corrupt, 
 or indirect motives or malice, or pecuniary yiterest,— the 
 badly-treated defendant, in most cases, is poor and wants 
 friends and assistance to prove his charge against the J. P. 
 
 But much worse is the position of a wronged plaintiff or 
 complainant. For if, instead of convicting the defendant, the 
 justice refuse to convict him, and dismiss the case, there is no 
 mode of reviewing his decision; ' ' the court (Queen's Bench) will 
 neither grant a mandamus, requiring the magistrate to re-hear 
 the case, nor award a certiorari to bring up the proceedings." 
 I never could see why the Plaintiff should not be allowed to 
 consider himself aggrieved by the decision of the magistrate 
 and have the privilege of appeal allowed him,— but so it is. 
 Away with the present system of dual representation by Police 
 Magistrates, and spare the long suffering public the sight of a 
 P. M. adjourning a case abruptly, when numbers of un- 
 examined witnesses had made sacrifices to appear before 
 him, One of the said P. M's own cases was pending in a 
 
 1 
 
16 
 
 rnore forgotten, 
 1 the magistrate's duty was o«<f ^ ^ suffer 
 Wgher court and the m^.„j^ted. They^ j„, Mr. 
 and the terms of Ins com ,y jranc ^ ^. ^^^ 
 
 as we do and ^rri,e J»«api^~-yVir eminent 
 
 --^ ^" rXt' ^^Hthis'consummationin;^; w^^ 
 manners and customs ^^^ =^ Jj^antroduction 
 
 further quote >n j^^^consult taken ^om^ ^^ ^ 
 
 fr;t'-"S L^SoTc^ sJ^rai virtues inthe same 
 judge is the result of ^^^.^^^ ^.^^^^ 
 
 individual. ^^^ layB claim to tm k ^^^^^^j 
 
 "^n'^ rS PO sees a rectitude of h^^*^^^ fi^„ess, 
 ought not only to po ^^^1, an mimo 
 
 integrity, ^-* -;;;:;i h a universal P-^^^^^^auct which 
 ^th're'TprS:!:^ ^ahits, to pre-v- ^^^^^^^ 
 
 :Ka-^^-trre":s:^^^^-^r ri^^ctse of a 
 
 private citizen, as a me^ ^^^'^^^f !„,"ldndifferent. 
 
 ^ . ' The people ««^""' ^^e, obedience is compie 
 
 ---r'aSt--^^ r'^zir^^ -^^^^-^^^' 
 
 i ft general , ^"^ , r,-^ «nfth by earning ^° 
 
 - only --iSrUroadiaU-n^*,, ^^ .^^,,,,, 
 
 ^hich is only bestow ^^ ^^^ ^f "1 those also of the- 
 
 "^''°'' to toi qualities of the heart, thos 
 ought to jom to these q 
 
 V* 
 
 ■ i 
 
 \ 
 
1 
 
 i 
 
 intellect, in order to acquire a c<)in|)lete knowledge of everything 
 connected with his o(Hce. He ought to make use of it in per- 
 forming liis (hities, to wliicli lie cannot <levote himself witli too 
 much ardor, nor with too mucli assiduity." 
 
 I Iiave now set fortli tiie theoretical rules of conduct for 
 Magistrates and Judges, and also the legislative enactments 
 giving all the force of punitive law to jirovisions in accordance 
 with these dicta of wisdom ; forbidding certain acts and limit- 
 ing the ollices and employments of those hoLling the responsible 
 position of Judge or ^Magistrate. Space forbids my enlarging 
 further ; but I may conclude by saying that these maxims, 
 sayings and rules of wise men, these statute laws, ordinances 
 and judicial decisions are not axioms or self-evident truths. 
 They are the result of synthetic reasoning, or the conclusions 
 obtairned from experience. Nearly all laws are, in a sense, ex 
 post facto, they are remedial or made with the intention to 
 counteract and remove certain evils. 
 
 In Crreat Britain, France, and the United States, irregu- 
 larities and mischiefs were found to arise after uniting any 
 f)ther emjiloyment with that of the Magistrate and Judge. 
 Moralists and jurisconsults wrote against the union, and legis- 
 lators ado])ted theii suggestions and forbade the banns. 
 
 The Province of Ontario still permits Attorneys, Queen's 
 Counsel Iccu-ned in the law, and others, to practice their profes- 
 sions an<l engage in other pursuits, and at the same time exercise 
 the grave duties of a Police Magistrate. It is to be hoped that 
 this anomaly will cease and determine by an Act of the Legis- 
 lature doing away with all exceptions — enacting that a Police 
 Magistrate shall be a Police Magistrate and nothing more. It 
 woidd be superfluous to argue that this is a consummation 
 devoutly to be wished. Men are the same everywhere, and 
 at ail times. If abuses sprang up in Europe, and were checked 
 by a similar Act on the part of the governing bodies— by an 
 arginnentam ad honiines, without further enciuiry, Ontario 
 
18- 
 
 should have Buch a measure passed. But we all know that the 
 very abuses and immoralities practised in Europe, wherever a 
 cumulation of employments was and is permitted to the Judge, 
 exist at the present moment in Ontario. The same temptations 
 to a Justice of the Peace to deliver a wrong judgment and 
 deviate from the straight path abound, and we know that thrv 
 are not always successfully resisted. 
 
 RICHARD JOHN WICKSTEED. 
 
I 
 
 I