IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 MS 
 
 ta lU |22 
 £ US. 12.0 
 
 
 L25 |t_U 11.6 
 
 6" 
 
 
 ^j"' 
 <> 
 
 J? 
 
 V 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sdenoes 
 
 Corporalion 
 
 23 WiST MAIN STMET 
 
 WItSTIR.N.Y. USM 
 
 (716)«72-4S03 
 
 
Ik 
 
 % 
 
 CiHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICIVIH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical ahd Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming, f-'eatures of this 
 copy which may be bibliographicallv unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommagde 
 
 □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie et/ou peiliculde 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 I I Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes giographiques en couleur 
 
 □ Coloured ink <i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 □ Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reii6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 □ Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serr6e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge int^rieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout^es 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t4 tilmAes. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires supplAmentaires; 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de rm procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sort peut-6tre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la m6thode normale de filmage 
 sont indiqu^s ci-dessous. 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 This itenr^ is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmi au taux de reduction indiquA ci-dessous. 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restauries et/ou peiliculdes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d^colordes, tachetdes ou piqu6es 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages ddtachdes 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of print varies/ 
 Quality indgaie de I'impression 
 
 I I Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 Comprend du materiel supplsmentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont &t6 fiim^es d nouveai* de fagon d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 
 
 
 16X 
 
 
 
 
 20X 
 
 
 
 
 24X 
 
 
 
 
 28X 
 
 
 
 
 32X 
 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 Thomss Fisher Rare Book Library, 
 University of Toronto Library 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the conditior and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 L'exemplaire film* f ut reproduit grAce A la 
 ginirositi de: 
 
 Thomas Fislwr Rare Book Library, 
 University of Toronto Library 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6tA reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettet* de rexemplaire film6, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmago. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cove.' when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol -^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corniiiir, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est ImprimAe sont filmto en commen^ant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par ia 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, seSon le cas. Tous les autrea exemplaires 
 originaux sont fiim^s en commenpant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaftra sur la 
 derniire image de cheque microfiche, salon le 
 cas: le symbols — ► s>ai.!rie "A SUIVRE ", le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Les cartes, piancfes, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 filmte A des taux de reduction diff^rents. 
 Lorsque le documsnt est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en ui ^aul clich6, 11 est film* d partir 
 de Tangle sup^rfc. - jauche, de gauche A droite, 
 et de haut en bas, • prenuiit le nombre 
 d'images n6cessaire. Les diagrammee suivants 
 illustrent la m^thode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 6 
 
/0t^^t^£4^H^^^uJj(?f^ f(((, 
 
 ,{^ 
 
 '^ruW^ 
 
 
 The 
 
 Relation of Economic Study 
 
 TO 
 
 Public and Private Charity. 
 
 Inaugural Lecture, 
 
 BY 
 
 JAMES MAYOR, 
 
 Professor of Political Economy and Constitutional History, University 
 
 of Toronto. 
 
■ -^^ 
 
 H^*^i 
 
 l1 
 
 >,',;^«^ '/'I 
 
1 r. 
 
 1 1 • 
 
 i i ♦ 
 
 . .. ; .'i 
 
 THE RELATION OF ECONOMIC STUDY TO 
 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CHARITY. 
 
THE REIyATION OK ECONOMIC STUDY TO 
 PUBI^IC AND PRIVATE CHARITY.* 
 
 The purpose of this paper is the discussion of certain as- 
 pects of the study of economics, especially this question : — 
 
 Of what avail is the study of economics in the practical 
 work of dealing with the problems of poverty ? In putting 
 the question thus, I am, perhaps, making too great a con- 
 cession to those who demand from study of any sort im- 
 mediate results in hard cash or some equally obvious medium 
 of exchange. Such persons must always remain strangers 
 to the pleasur^is of the pursuit of truth for its own sake 
 rather than for the sake of the profit that it brings, and 
 strangers also to the real enjoyment derivable from the getting 
 of knowledge ostentatiously useless. 
 
 Among the numerous inconsistencies in which we are apt 
 to detect each other, there is the inconsistency of feeling 
 more interested and excited about things remote than about 
 things near ; and at the same time demanding in connection 
 with things near, that every thought about them shall pay 
 in some definite form. We expend our compassion and our 
 money in sending missionaries to the heathen of other coun- 
 tries, or in alleviating the miseries of Russian Jews, or 
 Christians of the I^ebanon, while we manifest some impa- 
 tience at the demands upon our time and our purses for the 
 service of our next-door neighbors. The closer things are 
 to our vital interests, the less they interest us. We see too 
 much of them, and have them thrust in our eyes until we 
 are weary of them. Things that are familiar bore us to 
 death, even though we may run the risk of their doing us to 
 death in some other way. The commonplace does not excite 
 
 • Inaugural i:«ecture deUvered before the University of Toronto. February 6th, 
 
 1893. 
 
 (34) 
 
Relation op Economic Study to Charity. 35 
 
 us, because it is commonplace. What excites us is the novel, 
 the uncommon, th-, unfamiliar. Now, here, perhaps, is the 
 reason for the prevalence of the notion that political economy 
 is "the dismal science." Because it deals with the common 
 place, because it has to do with the familiar, it is dismal, 
 and for no other reason.* It is true that economics opens a 
 new window through which we may, if we will, look out 
 upon life ; but the window is glar.ed with no garish colors, 
 there is no inviting label to make us aware of the treasures 
 that lie within.— There is indeed a label which is tradition- 
 ally repellent — hence the popular view which, like most pop- 
 ular views, is partly justified and partly erroneous, that eco- 
 nomics is a dull affair, that it is a study by dull people, of 
 dull people, for dull people. 
 
 In so far as economics is regarded as dismal because of its 
 relation to every-day life, there is no help for it; in so far as 
 it is dismal because it throws little or no light upon practical 
 problems, there is no excuse for it. I^et us see how far and 
 in what way the study of economics can throw light upon 
 practical affairs. But first— What is the relation between 
 practical affairs and science of any kind ? Is it not this ? The 
 region of practical affairs is the region of action— it is the 
 region of art in the widest sense. The region of science is 
 the region of thought, of action too, no doubt, in the sense 
 of experiment and observation, but still essentially the 
 region of thought, of logical continuity, of guarded progress 
 from one proof to another, of careful employment of theories 
 and hypotheses. In science we think and talk about its 
 principles and classifications. In art we have no occasion 
 to talk— we have to do it. Art like charity, is to be done, 
 not to be talked about. It were childish to discuss the oppo- 
 sition of science and art, —the opposition of theory which is 
 in the region of science to practice, which is in the region 
 of art. They are not opposed, one is the complement or the 
 fruition of the other. Two theories may be opposed as twa 
 
 • Cf. Helps " Social Pressure." p. 255. 
 
AnnaivS of thb American Academy. 
 
 methods of practice may di£fer, but there is no such oppo- 
 sition, in reality as that which underlies the phrase " It is all 
 very well in theory but it does not work out in practice." 
 Where this phrase is employed : v will be found that there is 
 something loose in the theory, some error in the method of 
 working in the practice, or a total want of harmony between 
 the conditions presupposed in the theory and those which 
 actually accompany the practice. In any case it is a loose 
 and inaccurate phrase suggesting an opposition which has no 
 counterpart in reality. Science and art, theory and practice 
 are then not opposed, though they are diflferent. One is con- 
 cerned with executive power — with action, with the etnotions, 
 with the muscles, and the other with thought, with orderly 
 arrangement, with opinion, with criticism. 
 
 Now, though political economy is held by some to be an 
 art as well as a science, and perhaps rightly so held, we 
 must not confound the methods of the science of political 
 economy with those of the art of political economy. The 
 science of political economy is the province of the economist, 
 the art of political economy is the province of the statesman, 
 or the practical administrator in civic, national or inter- 
 national economic affairs. 
 
 The functions of the two classes of persons vary widely ; 
 the two classes may be of mutual aid, they may be of 
 mutual hindrance. The two functions require different 
 orders of mind, different aptitudes and different studies. 
 
 An excellent economist may make an indifferent states- 
 man, not because "what is all very well in theory will not 
 work out in practice," nor because the study of economics 
 is of no use to a practical statesman; but, because the qual- 
 ities which have enabled the economist readily to grasp 
 scientific principles are not those which as a statesman he is 
 called upon to exercise. Power to grasp scientific principles 
 is a valuable quality in any man ; but the statesman must 
 have other qualities beside, he must have the capacity and 
 the habit of control, he must have the magnetic power to bind 
 
Relation of Economic Study to Charity. 37 
 
 men together and to lead them his way. He must be a 
 man of action. It were as unreasonable to demand of 
 the economist administrative ability as to demand of the 
 statesman intimate knowledge and grasp of scientific prin- 
 ciples. 
 
 Yet it is of the greatest importance for the economist to 
 know, and to know exhaustively, the methods of practice, 
 however little he may share in them, as it is for the states- 
 man to know, and to know exhaustively, current theories of 
 political action, however little he may be able or desirous to 
 take a share in thinking them out. 
 
 The statesman, politician, town councilor or other rep- 
 resentative of the people who takes part in public economics 
 and who, nevertheless, passes the study of economics by on 
 the other side does so, not because there is any opposition 
 between sound theory and sound practice, but rather because 
 being a man of action he has no aptitude for abstract think- 
 ing, and no wish to trouble about it. The average man 
 does indeed confine himself to one or other sphere of 
 activity — to practical government or to the study of systems 
 of governments. 
 
 It will perhaps now be evident that objections to the econ- 
 omist because he is not practical are as valid as, and no more 
 valid than, objections to the politician because he does not 
 oflFer unbiased statements of theories of government instead 
 of party speeches. 
 
 AH this may seem rather elementary, yet, perhaps, at no 
 time has there been more need to emphasize this distinction 
 between science and art than there is now. If we are to 
 build up a science of economics we must do so with our eye 
 on, but with our minds and voices away from, the market 
 place or the hustings. We must have as little emotional 
 interest in this or that theory, or this or that policy, as we 
 should have in the examination of the evolutions of an oyster 
 feeding under a microscope or in the discussion of the 
 succession of the rocks in our neighborhood. 
 
Annaw op the American Academy. 
 
 One has often tried to get some account of a battle or of a 
 Ciimpaign from a private soldier, but always without success. 
 He knows only marchings and counter-marchings, knows 
 that one night he lay behind a hill and that the next moru' 
 ing his regiment charged over a plain. This is all. Any 
 student of history knows more of battles than the soldiers 
 who were there, who are not students o history. 
 
 Thus, in the turmoil of party politics, in the midst of the 
 struggles of Conservative and Liberal, Republican and Demo- 
 crat, N. P. and "grit," we here at least may be tranquil, 
 but observant. The onlookers see most of the game. 
 
 This then is the r61e of economic science in the study of 
 practical problems, it is to give a man that sane and all- 
 round view which our dual system of party government 
 tends to prevent him from having ; it is to show a man 
 that the result of his action is at the best uncertain, but that 
 in proportion as step by step he reasons rightly and com- 
 prehensively, he is the more likely to bring his action to 
 good issues. The study of economics makes a man modest, 
 would make even a politician modest. For it brings him 
 into the presence of the vast social and material forces with 
 which in any action on the large scale he has to reckon. It 
 makes him realize how complex are the issues of life, how 
 numerous the cross-currents, how many forces may conspire 
 to defeat his best aims. 
 
 And now, in this attitude of theoretically the most perfect 
 independence, the most absolute indiflference to the imme- 
 diate or remote results, the uttermost absence of what the 
 world calls "sentiment," let us regard the problems of 
 poverty. 
 
 The first question we must ask about poverty is — What is 
 the meaning of the word ? The dictionary does not help us 
 much, though it gives us a number of synonyms. While 
 every one has a general idea of what is meant by the expres- 
 sion, we should find considerable difference in ideas as 
 to what constitutes poverty. If our scientific method is to 
 
Relation op Economic Study to Charity. 39 
 
 avail us at all, it must first oflFer us the means of obtaining a 
 more definite idea of the range and meaning of poverty than 
 is offered to us in the language of every-day life. It must 
 provide us with some gauge for determining the degree of 
 poverty and with some method by which we may discover 
 where poverty comes in in the general scheme of things and 
 what brings it there. 
 
 Like all early inquiries, the early inquiries into poverty 
 regarded it as an isolated fact which might be considered 
 apart from the other facts of life, and described it as a disease 
 due to one or two specific causes, and capable of being dealt 
 with by one or two specific remedies. 
 
 But just as the study of physiology, — che study of 
 the normal action of the functions of the organism preceded 
 pathology, —the study of the morbid action of the 
 organs, so the scientific study of diseases of the social organ- 
 ism — social pathology we may call it — was necessarily pre- 
 ceded by study of the normal action of the economic functions. 
 It was necessary for us to have the study of the wealth of 
 nations before we could have the study of the poverty of 
 nations. 
 
 Technically the study of wealth is in the departments of 
 production and distribution — the study of poverty is in the 
 department of consumption.* Poverty is unsatisfied need. 
 The need is there, the resources to satisfy it are not there. 
 
 Poverty is thus the condition of those who live at a low 
 level, whose food, clothing and shelter are relatively inade- 
 quate — relatively inadequate — for if they were absolutely 
 inadequate, those who found themselves in that condition 
 would perish — inadequate relatively to the resources and 
 consumption of those who are living at a higher level. 
 
 Poverty is simply the shady side of life, and we cannot 
 understand that unless we understand what life is and how 
 it is now being lived by the people. We must, therefore, 
 
 * While ina>lequate production or a defective system of distribution may pro* 
 duce poverty, neither will determine the depth and range of it. 
 
40 
 
 Annai^ of the American Academy. 
 
 look upon the study of poverty as bein^ part of a large whole. 
 This is the central idea of the modern study of poverty. It 
 is a part of the study of the economic life of the people as a 
 whole. 
 
 The methods that are now being employed in the study 
 of poverty are simply the methods by which other sciences 
 than economics have succeeded in enlarging the domain of 
 knowledge, viz.^ observation, induction and deduction. 
 The same order of skill with which beasts, birds, fishes and 
 insects have been classified and arranged is at last being 
 brought to bear upon mankind. It is beginning to be 
 possible to understand ourselves. 
 
 This orderly scientific method is rather the outcome of the 
 general movement than the offspring of a single investiga- 
 tor. It has, indeed, not sprung into existence in a moment ; 
 but is rather a development, many workers having been 
 devoting themselves to a close and systematic study of 
 economic life, some of them even without being aware of the 
 importance of the work they were doing. 
 
 I desire to suggest the need of adequate coordination of 
 the results of such inquiries, rather than to make a pre- 
 mature attempt at coordination. It seems essential that the 
 order of facts whose interpretation is desired should be 
 widely understood. This order of facts may perhaps be 
 most effectually gathered from an account of two diflferent 
 but parallel investigations. 
 
 One of the leaders in the new method of the study of 
 society was Frederic lyC Play, who, in 1829, began the series 
 of family monographs which has been carried on by his 
 disciples over the period of sixty-four years that has 
 elapsed since then. It is not my purpose to give an ex- 
 haustive account of the method of I^e Play. I shall en- 
 deavor merely to indicate so much of it as may sufl&ce to 
 show its place in the study of the problem of poverty. 
 
 The chief feature in the method of I^e Play is the compre- 
 hensiveness and minuteness of its view of social life. It 
 
Relation of Economic Study to Charity. 41 
 
 takes as its starting point the idea that the unit of society is 
 the family, and that the plexus of social forces can only be 
 inductively studied by means of microscopic observation of 
 a great number of these units. The family, then, must 
 be examined in detail with scrupulous care, and its en- 
 vironment, heredity and characteristics exhaustively cata- 
 logued. 
 Thus, the three chief heads under which the investigation 
 
 must be carried on are these : 
 
 1 . The external condition of the family. 
 
 2. The status of the family, with its record of heredity. 
 
 3. The means and mode of existence of the family 
 It is the business of the observer to note : 
 
 I. THE EXTERNAL CONDITION OF THE FAMILY. 
 
 The Place of Habitation, —The features of the district ; the 
 municipal government ; the provision of open spaces ; means 
 of transit ; the physical characters of the district ; climate 
 and natural resources. 
 
 The Chief Industries.— "th^ mode in which these are or- 
 ganized—domestic or capitalistic ; exportation and importa- 
 tion from the district ; mode of land ownership ; division of 
 property ; state of commercial property ; number of popula- 
 tion, and trades of these. 
 
 2. CIVIL STATE OF THE FAMILY. 
 
 Constittition of the Family —l^a.mes and places. of birth 
 and death of members of the family. 
 
 Pension and Moral A^a*//^.— Religious belief of the family 
 and of the population in general ; influence of the clergy ; 
 details of religious practices ; private observances ; domestic 
 worship ; public worship ; sacred images ; ceremonies at 
 marriage, birth and death. 
 
 Domestic r?y/«/?J.— Attachment between homes; influ- 
 ence accorded to the wife in domestic affairs ; deference 
 accorded to aged parents— measures taken to secure for them 
 
4* 
 
 Annai^ of the American Academy. 
 
 a happy old age ; remembrance of dead parents ; affection 
 to offspring — measures taken for their development, moral 
 and intellectual ; treatment of domestics and animals. 
 
 Social Virtues. — Charity ; devotion ; disposition to hospi- 
 tality ; spirit of conciliation in dispute ; politeness and 
 harmony in social relations ; guild relations, friendly societies, 
 corporations, trade unions; deference and attachment of 
 family to employer ; relations with devotees of other religions ; 
 toleration. 
 
 Moral Habits Relative to Mode of Existence. — Inclination 
 to own property in house, furniture and in clothes ; tendency 
 to simplicity ; temperance in food and drink ; inclination to 
 save ; terms of investment of saved capital ; mode of trans- 
 mission of property to the period of old age and of death ; 
 tendency to remain in place of habitation or to emigrate 
 temporarily or permanently. 
 
 Principal Traits Characterizing Intellectual Development. — 
 Knowledge communicated by primary instruction and by 
 religious instruction ; special facts relative to the education 
 of children ;• the relation of the exercise of their trade to 
 intellectual development ; use of museums in this connec- 
 tion ; attachment to tradition, or tendency to innovations in 
 methods of labor ; relation of workmen to masters ; the 
 attitude of the family to civil and political institutions. 
 
 Hygiene.— '^\\& habitual state of health of the family; 
 practices of ablution ; cleanliness or otherwise of clothes and 
 houses. 
 
 Medical Sen 'ce. — Aptitude or ignorance of head of family 
 or of the wife o administer medical relief or to act as nurse ; 
 superstitious or archaic practices or theories regarding care 
 of health ; care of health of children bj" parents ; infant in- 
 surance, bearing upon health and life of children. 
 
 Rank of Family. — Relations of family with other families 
 of employers or workmen in same locality ; conception of 
 status of family by itself; relation to strangers; sociD-bility 
 or otherwise of family. 
 
Rei«ation op Economic Study to Charity. 43 
 
 '^ 
 
 3. MBANS OF SXISTENCB OP THE FAMILY. 
 
 Property Possessed by the Family. — Immovables, movables, 
 money, investments, tools, arms, domestic animals. 
 
 Subventions. — Charitable relief; payments by friendly 
 societies or trade unions during sickness or want of employ- 
 ment ; drugs ; use of hospital, school and church, so far as 
 these are free. 
 
 Labor. — I,abor executed by the workman and his family 
 for an employer ; labor executed by the workman and his 
 family for his own behoof. 
 
 It will be seen at once that here is something larger than 
 simply an economic investigation ; it is rather a sociological 
 investigation of the most comprehensive character. It is, 
 indeed, more than that, for it involves as well, topogfraphy, 
 the study of the physical environment. While the details 
 of the investigation are not such as might be undertaken by 
 the economist in the strict rendering of the expression, every 
 one of the points has its bearing upon the economic condi- 
 tion. The economic condition is indeed the resultant of 
 these various forces and the condition cannot be understood 
 without an investigatioti into the way in which it has been 
 produced. It may seem a hard saying, yet it is true, that 
 what we know about the economic condition of the popula- 
 tions of our large cities is mere vague surmise, depending 
 upon the statements of a few persons in each city, untrained, 
 as a rule, in rigid methods of induction, who form their 
 conclusions from a field of observation, limited by their own 
 casual experience. What we do need is detailed and con- 
 tinuous investigations along the lines I have sketched, with 
 competent co-ordination of the results. 
 
 The method of I^e Play is no visionary scheme, but is now 
 being applied to the study of populations in several widely 
 separated areas. Le Play's own monographs deal with society 
 in some of the European countries and in the East, and the 
 accumulation of material for co-ordination is still being car* 
 ried on by the Le Play societies. 
 
44 
 
 Annaw op thk American Academy. 
 
 By far the most important, in point of positive results of 
 the applications of modem scientific methods of research to 
 the study of society, and specially to the problems of pover- 
 ty, is the work of Mr. Charles Booth upon London. Mr. 
 Booth has carried on his investigation, independently of the 
 Ifi Play method, and on diflFerent, though somewhat similar, 
 but less systematic, lines. He has conceived the idea of 
 making an exhaustive study of the population of London — 
 from an economic point of view. With this object he has 
 already by the aid of an army of assistants, thoroughly ex- 
 plored a great part of London. He has made a careful 
 investigation of a vast number of families and has gleaned 
 not all, but a large number of the relevant facts about them. 
 He has classified these facts and drawn certain provisional 
 conclusions from them. His work is indeed, in most ways, 
 a perfect model of what such an investigation should be. 
 The conditions of each great city are so different from those 
 of every other that not until we have before us similar in- 
 vestigations of other cities shall we be entitled to form 
 definite conclusions about the poverty in them. 
 
 Early in Mr. Booth's investigations he found it necessary 
 to devise a classification which might serve as a standard for 
 the measurement of different degrees of poverty. 
 
 The standard is as follows : — 
 
 A. The lowest class of occasional laborers, loafers and 
 semi-criminals. 
 
 B. Casual earnings — very poor. 
 
 C. Intermittent earnings, ) ^ , , „ ,. 
 , D. Small, irregular earnings, J^og^ther. the -poor." 
 
 E. Regular standard earnings — above the line of poverty. 
 
 P. Higher class labor. 
 
 G. Lower middle class. 
 
 H. Upper middle class. 
 
 These divisions are of necessity arbitrary. In different 
 places, or at different periods in the same place, they would 
 be denoted by different pecuniary amounts. Each division 
 
 1 
 
rl^ 
 
 
 Relation of Economic Study to Charity. 45 
 
 is, however, sufl&ciently permanent in its central idea for prac- 
 tical purposes. In I^ondon, in 1886-89, when these inves- 
 tigations were made, the ' ' poor, ' ' Classes C and D comprised 
 those who have an income of from $4.75 to $5. 10 (iSsto 21s) 
 per week for a moderate family ; Class B comprises those 
 who fall below this amount. * The * * poor ' ' may be described 
 as living in a state of struggle to obtain the necessaries of life; 
 while the very poor "live in a state of chronic want." 
 
 Here, then, we have a gauge by which to measure the 
 standard of comfort of the people. The gauge is readily 
 adjustable to any locality. What we need to do is by a 
 general inquiry to fix the amount of the money wages ap- 
 plicable to each class with the relative numbers in family and 
 then proceed to discover by minute inquiry what the standard 
 of comfort is in each family over the different quarters of 
 a city. This inquiry involves a vast amount of time and 
 trouble, and must be repeated at moderate intervals ; but 
 without such an inquiry our knowledge of the people, of 
 their standard of comtbrt, of what constitutes poverty, 
 and the extent of it is quite vague and indefinite. 
 
 The results of Mr. Booth's investigations into the economic 
 condition of a certain portion of the people of I^ndon re- 
 veal many interesting points. In the district chosen by 
 him for investigation in the first instance, East lyondon and 
 Hackney, comprising an area of about seven square miles 
 in the east of I^ondon, bounded on the south by the river 
 Thames, on the west by the city and on the east by the 
 P'^ :;1ar marshes, there are about 900,000 inhabitan\*'s. Of 
 these 64.8 per cent were above the line of poverty and 35.2 per 
 cent were below it. Of this 35.2 per cent, or 315,000 persons 
 below the line of poverty, only 6000 were inmates of instita- 
 tions, so tliat over 300,000 persons were living in poverty in 
 this area — one-third of the population. 
 
 But of these 300,000 persons living In poverty, 128,000, 
 or nearly one-half, were earning regular low wages; 74,000. 
 
 • C. Booth. "Life and I<abor in Bast I«ondon.'" Vol. I, P. 33. 
 
46 
 
 Annai^ of the Ambrican Academy. 
 
 or about one-fourth, were making irregular earnings; ioo,ooo» 
 or one-third, were making casual earnings; while 11,000, or 
 4 per cent of the poor, or i}{ per cent of the whole 
 population of the district, belonged to the lowest class of 
 occasional laborers, loafers and semi-criminals. 
 
 Here, then, it is clear that in studying the problems of 
 poverty we have to deal not alone with those who claim 
 public relief as paupers, or who claim private charity as 
 beggars, but with the great army from which these classes 
 are constantly recruited, the army of those who live at or 
 under the line of poverty — a great army living at a depressed 
 rate of life and tending to reduce the vitality of the whole 
 population. 
 
 But Mr. Booth has done something more than merely 
 discover the extent of poverty. He has made inquiry into 
 its causes. The causes of poverty turn out not only to be 
 numerous, but interactive. There is the principal cause 
 and the contributing cause, there is the cause and the effect 
 visible in the same person, or in two or more persons. 
 Thus the poverty of a child may not be due to any fault 
 on the part of the child, but to one or the other parent or 
 both. 
 
 This strictly empirical investigation of Mr. Booth's reveals 
 the following causes of poverty operating as principal or 
 contributory causes : 
 
 Crime, vice, drink, laziness, pauper associations, heredity, 
 mental disease, temper, incapacity, early marriage, large 
 family, extravagance, lack of work (unemployed), trade 
 misfortune, restlessness (roving, tramp) , no relations, death 
 of husband, desertion (abandoned), death of father or 
 mother, sickness, accident, ill luck, old age. 
 
 It is difl&cult to give a fair idea of Mr. Booth's investiga- 
 tions from his voluminous tables. But, out of 1000 paupers 
 in Stepney whose cases were carefully investigated individ- 
 ually it was found that old age was the chief principal and 
 contributory cause. 
 
 
I 
 
 Relation op Economic Study to Charity. 47 
 
 26.7 par cent. 
 12.6 " 
 
 4.7 " 
 4.4 •• 
 I.I •' 
 
 17 per cent. 
 
 (( 
 
 Old age was the principal cause in 32.8 per cent of the 
 cases. 
 
 Sickness 
 
 Drink^ 
 
 Accident 
 
 Trade misfortune, 
 Pauper asiiociations and heredity, 
 As contributory causes: 
 
 Old age contributed of the cases, 
 Pauper associations and heredity contributed 
 chiefly with sickness, drink and old age as 
 principal causes of the cases, . . 17 
 Drink contributory cause, with sickness and 
 old age as pnncipal causes, accounted for 
 the pauperism of .... 12 " 
 While sickness accounted for an equal number. 
 Altogether drink is returned as responsible directly as 
 principal, or indirectly as contributory, cause for 25 per cent 
 of the cases. Mr. Booth, however, says "the proportion is 
 less than might have been expected, and it is probable that 
 closer research into the circumstances and history of these 
 people, if it could be made, might disclose a greater connec- 
 tion than here appears between pauperism and the public 
 house. It is, however, noteworthy that the results shown 
 agree on the whole with those of the two inquiries I have 
 myself previously made into apparent causes of poverty. 
 The first regarding 4000 cases of poverty known by certain 
 of the School Board visitors, gave 13 to 14 per cent as 
 one to drink, the lighter percentage being for the greater 
 degree of poverty. The second, regarding about 5000 
 people living poor and irregular lives, showed 10 and 1 1 
 per cent, dropping to only 5 per cent for about another 
 3000 who though poor were more regularly employed." 
 
 In St. Pancras workhouse, the number of cases in which 
 pauperism was due to old age as a principal cause was 23.4 
 per cent. 
 
48 
 
 Annals op thb Amsrican Academy. 
 
 i 
 
 To sickness, 
 
 To drink, 
 
 To laziness. 
 
 To mental derangement. 
 
 20.7 per cent. 
 21.9 •' 
 10.6 " 
 
 4.3 " 
 
 In St. Pancras workhouse about the same number of cases 
 were investigated but they included a smaller number of 
 permanent paupers than the Stepney house whose figures were 
 first quoted. The current cases exhibit the largest amount 
 of drunkenness. The " ins and outs," or those who go to 
 the workhouse for a while and then leave, are specially not- 
 able for drunken habits. Forty-three per cent of the ' ' ins 
 and outs " were obliged to seek refuge in the workhouse on 
 account of drink. 
 
 The details of Mr. Booth's conclusions are to be found in 
 his smaller volume on Pauperism.* His main conclusion is 
 that old age is the most frequent principal cause of pauper- 
 ism, and he suggests as a remedy for this cause a national 
 scheme of endowment of old age. Old age, then, stands 
 first, sickness next and then comes drink. 
 
 Supremely valuable as Mr. Booth's work is, it stops short 
 of a full revelation of the reason why we have this mass of 
 poverty. It discloses the immediate causes of poverty, it 
 does not disclose the remoter causes of it. For the empirical 
 investigation of these we must turn to the more comprehen- 
 sive method of Frederic I^e Play, the close study of the 
 family, each family the subject of a separate monograph nar- 
 rating its record as a family, its ethnical position, its migra- 
 tions, its industrial status, its sources of income and methods 
 of expenditure. 
 
 Study of poverty in the economic sense is thus a 
 branch of the study of economic life — a branch involving 
 special methods of research and investigation, special methods 
 of record and generalization. 
 
 Not that this can be done easily, on the contrary, even as 
 regards pauperism, a detailed investigation into the record of 
 
 • C. Booth. " Pauperism : A Picture." 
 
Relation op Economic Study to Charity. 49 
 
 any considerable number of pauper families might be almost 
 impossible. Yet su. n an investigation would probably 
 show us that poverty, especially in England is not 
 wholly a creation of to-day, but is largely a legacy from 
 the past. One cannot read the economic history of the 
 country without feeling convinced that the underpaid and 
 stunted weavers and mechanics of the beginning of the cen- 
 tury and the half-starved agricultural laborers, who sys- 
 tematically received part of their wages out of the poor rates, 
 have taken a frightful revenge — have bequeathe^ not wealth, 
 which moth and rust might corrupt, but poverty, which 
 flourishes in corruption. Neglect in the past of obvious 
 physiological laws is responsible for much of the poverty 
 of to-day. 
 
 In a very real sense the sins of the fathers are visited upon 
 the children, even unto the third and fourth generation. 
 Whole nations may suffer for some class sins of a bygone 
 age. Much of the low level of modem life is due, we can 
 hardly doubt, to causes reaching far back in the history of 
 each race — some of them not indeed so very far back, but 
 still behind the immediate range of vision. Thus much of 
 the low level of modem life is due to the existence of a 
 definite nucleus of hereditary pauperism. This hereditary 
 pauperism is due again in a large measure, no doubt, to the 
 modes of dispensing public and private charity, which have 
 endured, more or less, from the middle ages until now. And 
 the unfortunate and disagreeable fact emerges in most in- 
 quiries on the subject that not a few of the charitable agencies 
 and not a few charitable individuals are steadily adding to 
 the ranks of professional pauperism by an ill-considered sys- 
 tem of doles. It is hard to resist the moving of the bowels 
 of compassion and to refuse to give a coin to a beggar, but 
 after all the giving of the coin is an easy salve to the con- 
 science. It is much easier, for example, than taking pains 
 to discover the exact reason for the poverty of the beggar 
 and setting about to devise means at once to save the man 
 
 I 
 
50 
 
 Annaw op thb American Academy. 
 
 and prevent so far as may be future cases of the same order. 
 I need not weary you with criticisms of the results of indis- 
 criminate alms giving. These have been urged over and 
 over again by every charity organizer, from Defoe in his 
 essay " On Giving Alms no Charity," down to our own day. 
 Much of the misery is due also, no doubt, to the economic 
 changes that in many countries have tran.<iformed agricultural 
 into industrial and industrial into commercial communities. 
 What is popularly known as *' modem progress " consists in 
 changes of this sort. Some of these changes, probably most 
 of them, are due to imperious forces which will not be gain- 
 said, are due to physical changes, climatic and other, are 
 due to pressure of population, or external or internal influ- 
 ences too varied to enumerate. While the main facts of 
 these changes are probably inevitable, because they are due 
 to forces which it were useless to fight against, much may 
 be done to mitigate the severity of a change to those who 
 are victimized by it. Failure to do this by some means or 
 other, by voluntary private action or by compulsory State or 
 municipal action, inevitably results in accession to the ranks 
 of those who have gone down in the struggle with the new 
 forces. Such victims of what is called progress, where they 
 do not die, live to produce an enfeebled and deteriorated 
 generation. Successive changes of this kind have resulted 
 in the casting off, as by centrifugal force, from the round of 
 industry, ^f great numbers of men and women. Thus, 
 apart altogether from personal misconduct, which counts 
 for much, but which is often traceable to inherited tenden- 
 cies, there is in modem industrial life an excessive develop- 
 ment of this form of struggle, one of the forms of the ' ' straggle 
 for existence," which goes on on all the rungs and from top 
 to bottom of the biological ladder. It is a struggle of pro- 
 cesses as well as of men, in which the processes often victim- 
 ize the men who devise them. It may be that nothing can 
 meanwhile be done to mitigate the severity of the effects of 
 these changes iu general or on the large scale, but much 
 
Relation of Economic Study to Charity. 51 
 
 may be done— much is being done on the small scale. 
 Manufacturers to-day who introduce new machinery are, as 
 a rule, more considerate of their workers than they used to 
 be, partly, perhaps, owing to the moralization of the em- 
 ployer and partly to the combination of the workers. Thus 
 we have witnessed during the past few years many industrial 
 changes and, no doubt, much victimization, but probably 
 less serious suffering than might otherwise ha'.e bean the 
 case. 
 
 An exhaustive examination of economic life, would involve 
 inquiry as to how far what is known as the factory system 
 is associated with the development of poverty, and as to what 
 are the precise relations between the growth of towns and the 
 growth within them of a proletariat class, or landless, work- 
 less class, probably partly inheriting their inefl&ciency. 
 
 Apart from the general influence of the factory system 
 upon industrial society, there is the influence of the com- 
 mercial system. The huge circulatory system of modern 
 commerce works smoothly for a while, and then, from an 
 obscure or undiscoverable cause, is suddenly or gradually 
 constricted at some point, while the whole system, inti- 
 mately sympathetic as it is, is affected by the constriction. 
 These fluctuations in commerce produce corresponding 
 fluctuations in industry, and we have the alternate phenomena 
 of inflation and depression of trade. 
 
 Thus one of the results of the departure now going on 
 in a greater or lesser degree in most civilized countries, from 
 "the stable basis of agriculture to the fluctuating basis of 
 trade," is the irregularity of employment. Exact figures in 
 this connection are hard to get as yet, although they are being 
 more industriously collected now than ever before. By way of 
 illustration we may take the record of a period of depression 
 where, of course, this condition of irregularity is most mani- 
 fest. Of 30,000 workmen in the East of I^ondon, whose 
 cases were investigated in 1887, 14,000 or 47 per cent had 
 been working continuously for six months or more, while 
 
52 
 
 Annaus op the American Academy. 
 
 29 per cent had been working only two months in the aggre- 
 gate out of the six, and 23 per cent had been idle for various 
 periods, extending from two to ten weeks, that is that 53 per 
 cent of these 30,000 workmen belonging to thirty-four differ- 
 ent classes of occupations, and a much larger number of indi- 
 vidual occupations, were exposed to serious irregularities of 
 employment. Of these 3 per cent only were permanently 
 disabled and 3 per cent were temporarily disabled, and were, 
 therefore, not physically equal to mannel labor.* The 
 returns of trade unions illustrate the same condition. Irregu- 
 larity of employment leads directly or indirectly to 
 poverty. 
 
 The alert and shrewd among workmen reckon upon and 
 prepare for these periods of depression. They insure against 
 them by actual saving and by paying into a trade society. 
 It may be held, therefore, that in some industries wages are 
 higher than they would otherwise be were it not for these 
 fluctuations. The trade union is largely to be credited 
 with providing a compensation balance which steadies the 
 industrial system and prevents it from feeling the full eflFects 
 of the fluctuations of commerce. 
 
 Beneath the industrious and provident workman, and 
 forming a large class in the communities of the Old World 
 and in some of those of the New, there are the men who, 
 whenever the first wave of depressic n comes, find themselves 
 without employment. The unskillful, the lazy, the ill-tem- 
 pered (for this, as every careful observer knows, is quite a 
 large cause of poverty) , the dissolute, are naturally dismissed 
 first, while the skillful, active and good-tempered, steady 
 men remain till the last. 
 
 The class thus indicated form the ranks of the unem- 
 ployed whenever depression in trade causes a diminution of 
 employment. 
 
 We may now divide each of Mr. Booth's classes A, B, C 
 and D into sub-classes. In each we will find : — 
 
 * FarliameiiUry Paper. C. iatH. 1887. P. a. 
 
I 
 
 Rki^ation of Economic Study to Charity. 5J 
 
 1 . The aged. 
 
 2. The insane. 
 
 3. The sick, including (a) Those suflfering from diseases 
 due to drunkenness, {b) Those suflFering from other diseases. 
 
 4. The able-bodied unemployed. 
 
 L^t us enumerate rather than examine the methods adopted 
 in dealing with these classes. 
 
 There are three main methods of general application and 
 in general use : 
 
 These are 
 
 1. Compulsory rating for State or district relief, with ad- 
 ministration by nominated or popularly elected representa- 
 tion, as in England. 
 
 2. Voluntary Associations, as in Canada. 
 
 3. A union of these, as in the case of the poor by a State 
 church, or as in what is known as the Elberfeld system. 
 
 Private or unorganized charity cannot fairly be classed as a 
 system, although it is possible that mo:e is done, both of good 
 and of evil, by private charity than by any of the systems. Ju- 
 dicious private charity may render unnecessary the establish- 
 ment of a public system, while the establishment of a public 
 system may on the other hand tend to stamp out private charity. 
 
 If we could be quite certain that every man had a perfectly 
 alert regard to his own interest, and the most ample oppor- 
 tunity to secure his interest, together with a perfectly keen 
 sense of his responsibilities and duties, there would be theo- 
 retic justification for sternly refusing relief of any kind. 
 But we know that men do not grow that way, and that there- 
 fore, however unfortunate in many ways it may be for 
 society, society must make good the shortcomings of the 
 individual for no other reason, so far as society is concerned, 
 than the desire for self-preservation. It is true that the effect 
 of this action of society is to transfer the responsibility from 
 the individual to society. But since in the cases concerned 
 the personal responsibility is not recognized, there is a clear 
 gain in the recognition of it as a social responsibility. 
 
54 
 
 Annai^ op the Ambrican Academy. 
 
 As regards the aged, sick and insane poor, granted the 
 duty of maintaining them, the question is — How is it to be 
 done most efficiently ? By indoor maintenance in the poor- 
 house or asylum, or by outdoor relief in the shape of allow- 
 ances, pensions or otherwise. 
 
 In the cases of the insane and in the cases of those who 
 are sick from infectious diseases, there is everywhere a defi- 
 nite tendency to treat these in a hospital or asylum. While 
 the expenses of administration vary widely, there can be 
 little doubt that for the sick and insane, indoor treatment is, 
 on the whole, more efficient and less expensive than any 
 other method would be. 
 
 The establishment of asylums with farms attached, for 
 inebriates, has been carried to some extent in Germany* and 
 elsewhere, but it would be premature to express any judg- 
 ment upon the results. Ii is difficult for the authorities 
 even in Germany to keep the tiaces of those who pass 
 through the asylums and leave, and in the absence of definite 
 knowledge of this sort, conclusions would be misleading. 
 
 Taken generally, and efficient administration being 
 assumed, the evidence seems to be in favor of indoor treat- 
 ment of the sick and insane. As regards the aged, the evi- 
 dence is by no means so clearly in favor of indoor treatment. 
 The policy of the English poor law until 1834 was wholly 
 in the direction of outdoor relief ; but after the Report of 
 the Commission of that year, condemning outdoor relief on 
 account of the serious abuses which had crept into the poor 
 law administration, the policy was changed. Gradually the 
 amount expended in outdoor relief has diminished and the 
 amount expended in indoor relief has increased. 
 
 You will not expect me to discuss at this moment the de- 
 tails of so large a question, but it may fairly be concluded 
 from the evidence in England, Germany and America, that 
 the question as to which means of relief should be adopted 
 
 * As in the Salem Colony for Inebriates at Rickling, Schleswig-Holstein. 
 Report quoted above. 
 
 See 
 
 i 
 
Rbi,ation op Economic Study to Charity. 55 
 
 is one which depends rather upon the conditions, historical, 
 social and individual than upon any abstract principle. The 
 important thing is to know precisely what the conditions 
 are. 
 
 Several schemes associated more or less definitely, with the 
 question of outdoor relief, have recently been urged upon 
 public attention. 
 
 The National Insurance system of Germany, and the 
 National Pension schemes of Mr. Chamberlain and of Mr. 
 Charles Booth are really systems of outdoor relief. 
 
 The national insurance system has not had a very long 
 trial ; but it would appear that considerable difficulties are 
 being met with. Malingering is, it is understood, going far 
 to make the system unworkable without regulations of addi- 
 tional severity. While malingering applies rather to an 
 insurance scheme than to a pension scheme, and is, moreover, 
 a practical difficulty that may be coped with, a rather serious 
 theoretic objection lies against all pension schemes. Do 
 they not really amount to a rate in aid of wages ? Do not 
 pensioners now hire themselves for less than men who are 
 not pensioners can subsist upon, and so tend to diminish the 
 rate of wages of their grade of labor. 
 
 It may be that a national pension scheme would have this 
 result on a large scale, unless the age at which the pension 
 was payable were fixed beyond the age at which the average 
 man would be likely to work. There are, besides the diffi- 
 culties of dealing with the existing pension agencies, especially 
 the fiiendly societies, the difficulty of collecting a special rate 
 for the purpose from each individual, or of dispensing with a 
 special pension payment and throwing the total cost vipon 
 the national revenue as a whole. These difficulties seem 
 large ; perhaps they are not insurmountable. 
 
 The crux of the poverty question in Europe just now is 
 the treatment of the able-bodied unemployed. The numbers 
 of these to be dealt with at any moment, even in a time of 
 depression, are very indefinite. They fluctuate from day to 
 
56 
 
 Annals of the American Academy. 
 
 day, from hour to hour. At one moment the ranks of the 
 unemployed are mainly filled by industrious workmen, who 
 would work if they could get work to do, at another with 
 loafers who hang on the skirts of every relieving agency, 
 and are not only kept alive, but formed into a compact class 
 of professional dead-beats. 
 
 How is the first class to be sifted from the second ? for 
 obviously the kind of treatment they need is widely different 
 fi'om the kind of treatment which the others need. 
 
 The aspect which this part of the problem of poverty pre- 
 sents to most persons is this : Here are some thousands or 
 some hundreds of thousands of mouths to be fed ; but these 
 mouths have intimate association with twice as many hands 
 to feed them. What is wrong that the hands cannot feed the 
 mouths ? 
 
 Now this question, which might be put by a child, which 
 is indeed often put by children, involves no simple answer. 
 I have already sufl&ciently insisted upon the unity of economic 
 life to make that clear. If all these hundreds of thousands 
 of workless men were transported to another planet, or to 
 some neglected spot upon this one, and if their labors were 
 organized spontaneously or otherwise, they might work for 
 each other, and get on quite merrily ; but we may do more 
 harm than good by attempting to force the unemployed back 
 into the industrial system. If we get them to make things 
 for us which we do not want, we simply waste our money ; 
 while if we get them to make things for us that we do 
 want, we simply transfer our demand from one set of 
 workmen whom we are just now employing to those new- 
 comers who want employment. We do not make any fresh 
 demand for labor, we simply transfer our demand froni one 
 group to another, and in so far as we do so, we tend to 
 impoverish one set of men while we enrich another set. If 
 we were sure that we were distributing our demand more 
 uniformly and with greater benefit to society than before, 
 there might be something to be said for our action ; but can 
 
 r 
 
RRI.ATION OF Economic Study to Charity. 57 
 
 -we be sure that we are doing so ? Now, here we might 
 arrive at an impasse ; but there is no need for that. We 
 cannot remove our unemployed to another planet, yet we 
 may find some place on our own which is not occupied, we 
 may plant them down there, and let them produce for each 
 other. If we can get them simply to produce for each other, 
 without coming into the market with their products subsidized 
 by our charity in any way, there will be a clear gain in the 
 production. They will cease to be a charge upon society. 
 They will become producers. Nor need there necessarily be 
 any emigration. Migration from the overcrowded centres 
 to the neglected spots of the country, with efficient organi- 
 zation of labor, that is all. 
 
 Now, all this is exceedingly attractive. I will not weary 
 you by reciting a rather long list of authors within the past 
 two or three centuries, who thought that they had found 
 social salvation along these lines, nor with any detailed 
 account of the numerous experiments that have been tried. 
 The oldest modern experiment is the old English Poor I^aws ; 
 the largest modern experiment is the German Labor Colony 
 System. The old English Poor I^aw was in many ways a 
 failure ; largely, perhaps, for the reason alleged by Fielding, 
 that while the statutes prescribed what was to be done, 
 they did not tell how to do it. At any rate, the House of 
 Industry and the Parish farm, after a chequered career, 
 dis'ippeared, and it was not until the establishment of the 
 Dutch lyabor Colonies, early in the century, that the idea 
 of ' ' work, not alms, ' ' was again carried out on any con- 
 siderable scale. 
 
 What our study of poverty reveals to us in this connection 
 is this : That of those who have been bom into or who have 
 been sinking into poverty, there are some, not relatively a 
 laige number, in a new country, but even there a number 
 fluctuating with the fluctuations of trade, who are unable to 
 get any one to organize their labor for them, that is to em- 
 ploy them, and who are also unable to do so for themselves. 
 
58 
 
 Annate of the American Academy. 
 
 The question is, should society undertake this organization ; 
 should it undertake to do what the industrial system has 
 failed to do ; should it accept the responsibility of glossing 
 over what may turn out to be defects in the industrial sys- 
 tem by regimenting its failures. / 
 
 A sufl&cient number of persons in Germany have taken 
 this view of social responsibility to establish twenty-four 
 farms upon which all comers may work and be fed. No 
 work, no food ; but still to all comers work and food. Those 
 who are unable to get any one to organize their labor may 
 walk into the farm and forthwith have their labor organized 
 on subsistence terms.* 
 
 Vagrancy is strictly put down in Germany and the strict 
 observance of the law is rendered possible by the existence 
 of those institutions in which a man bufiFeted and * 'shipwrecked 
 inwardly and outwardly, ' ' as the expressive phrase of one 
 of the reports has it, may spend a few months of healthy 
 life and then return to competitive industry. 
 
 The advantages of the system appear to outweigh the dis- 
 advantages so far as Germany is concerned. A similar sys- 
 tem exists in Holland, and an experiment in the same 
 direction is being made in France. In England, General 
 Booth's farm at Hadleigh is a labor colony of the same order, 
 though it performs also the function of a place for training 
 emigrants.! How far the latter function may usefully be 
 conjoined with the other functions of the institution is very 
 doubtful. In a certain number of cases of lapse, no doubt, 
 good emigrants may be found ; but the presumption is 
 against a nation discharging upon the shores of its colonies, 
 or of other nations, the products of the sinister side of its 
 industrial and social life. 
 
 The farm colony, pure and simple, may be said to fill two 
 functions, both of them desirable up to a certain point, (i) 
 
 * For a recent account of these colonies see " Report on labour Colonies," by 
 J. Mavor, J R. Motion, J. Speir, and R. P. Wright. Glasgow, 1893. 
 
 t See Report cited atx>ve. 
 
Rei,ation op Economic Study to Charity. 59 
 
 It fills the function of a sanatorium where a man, who has 
 been broken in health on account of want of employment or 
 otherwise, may recover in the fresh air, in the wholesome 
 and regfular diet and discipline of the country colony, the 
 spring which he has lost in the city. (2) It fills the 
 function of organizers of labor for those who cannot organize 
 their own. It seems likely that these two functions will 
 have to be divided, the first to be undert?.ken by the exist- 
 ing colonies, the second by other colonies to be established 
 for permanent occupation by colonists cultivating upon a co- 
 operative or peasant proprietary basis. In any case the 
 colonies must dt good in so far as they take off from the 
 slums of the cities, year by year, crowds of men who are 
 rapidly sinking into degradation, and in so far as they make 
 men of them. They will also avoid injurious influences 
 upon the economic conditions of society, in so far as they 
 are rigidly self-contained, that is, in so far as they avoid 
 sending their subsidized products into the market for sale. 
 For the rest, farm colonies, though conceivably an efficient, 
 have proved to be a rather expensive form of poor relief. 
 
 Now, where economic students may most efficiently be of 
 service in practical problems is in thoroughly and system- 
 atically mastering the conditions. Be it ours to study, and 
 so far as we may, interpret the facts as we see them. 
 
 We hear occasionally the phrase, ' * You are disobeying the 
 laws of political economy." If by the laws of political 
 economy are meant the laws of the action of the social forces, 
 these laws are no more to be disobeyed than the law of gravi- 
 tation, or the law of expansion of gases. What ought to be 
 said is, " You are disregarding the lessons of history." It 
 is mainly from disregarding the plain lessons of history, 
 frequently firom ignorance of these, that men go wrong in 
 political action. 
 
 Wb^t we need in the study of economics to avail us in 
 practical affairs is— insight, insight, and always insight. 
 To get at the inwardness of a matter of ancient history, 
 
6|> ANNAI3 OF THE AMERICAN ACADEM/. 
 
 When aU the elements of it that have come down to 
 us through the ages, have faUen into line and when we may 
 ^ them in perspective, is fairly hard even for the most com- 
 tjetent student ; it is difficult for us, for example, to trace the 
 ^"s^gesof landholding in England or to discover the 
 real meaning of the steps by which the English laborer 
 emerged from serfdom ; but it is still more difficult for us to 
 see the real bearing of what goes on under our very eyes, to 
 see with entirely dear and disinterested vision the dir«:tion of 
 the forces that are weaving in the " roaring loom of time. 
 
 James Mayor. 
 
 Vniversity (if Toronto. . ., 
 
 f I f 
 
 ... 
 
Jit ^^ 
 
 t^S. .. .v^-^^^^,?^': JL^T^^ ^^^.