IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) ^/ 4 ^ ,^^. A % % - : (■■ 1.0 I.I 1.25 ■ 50 *'^™ ^ U& i: ■ 2.5 m 2.2 2.0 1.8 U ill 1.6 <9 ^ ^r /2 ^> 5 ^ '/ /^, Hiotographic Sciences Corporation r\^ \ sj ■^ 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 873-4503 V H CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notaa/Notas tachniquaa at bibliographiquaa Tha Inatituta haa attamptad to obtain tha baat original copy availabia for filming. Faaturaa of thia copy which may ba bibliographically uniqua. which may altar any of tha imagaa in tha raproduction, or which may aignificantly changa tha uaual mathod of filming, ara chacicad balow. L'Inatitut a microf limA la mailleur exemplaira qu'ii -ji a AtA poaaibia da aa procurer. Lea dAtaiia da cat exemplaira qui aont paut-itre uniquea du point da vua bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dana la mAthode normale de f ilmage aont indiqute ci-daaaoua. Coiourad covara/ Couvertura da coulaur — Coloured pagea/ Pagea da couleur Covara damagad/ 1 — 1 Couvartura andcmmagAa f— Pagea damaged/ Pagea endommagAea Covara raatorad and/or laminatad/ 1— — 1 Couvartura raataurte at/ou paliicul6a Pagea reatored and/or laminated/ Pagea reataurAea at/ou pallicul6ea Covar titia miaaing/ 1 — 1 La titra da couvartura manque IX Pagea diacolourad, atained or foxed/ Pagea d6color«ea, tachatAea ou piquiaa Coloured mapa/ l—l Cartea gAographtquaa en couleur Pagea detached/ Pagea ditachtea Thai to th The P088 of th filmi Origi begii the I 3ion, othe first sion, or ill □ Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encra de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ IX Showthrough/ Tranaparance n n n D Planchea at/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ ReliA avec d'autres documents Tight bindiny may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La reliura serr^e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion la long de la marge intArieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certainaa pages blanches ajoutias lors d'une rastau ration apparaissent dans la texte. mais. lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont pas At6 filmAas. Additional comments:/ Commentairas suppl6m«ntaires: I I Quality of print variaa/ Quality in4gale de I'impreaaion includaa auppiamentary material/ Comprand du mat6riel aupplAmantaira Only edition evailable/ Seule Mition diaponible D Pagea wholly or partially obacurati by errata slips, tissuea. etc.. have been ref limed to enaura the beat poaaibia image/ Lea pagea totalement ou partiallement obacurciaa par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure. etc.. ont M filmAes A nouveau de fa^un k obtanir la mailleure image possible. The shall TIIMl whic Map diffe entii begi right requ metl This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est fllmi au taux de reduction indiquA ci-dessous. 10X 14X 18X 22X 26X aox y 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X The copy filmed here hes been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: National Library of Canada L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grAce A la gintrositi de: Bibliothdque nationale du Canada The Images appearing here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in keeping with the filming contract specifications. Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed beginning with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impression. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol ^^ (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: Les images suivantes ont M reproduces avec le plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et de la netteti de l'exemplaire film6, et en conformity avec les conditions du contrat de filmage. Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en papier est imprim6e sont fiimis en commenpant par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires originaux sont fiim^s en commen9ant par la premiere page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par la derniAre page qui comporte une telle empreinte. Un des symboles suivants apparaTtra sur la dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbols — ► signifie "A SUIVRE ", le symbols V signifie "FIN". Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre film6s d des taux de reduction diffdrents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre reproduit en un seul cliche, il est fiimd d partir de I'angle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche A droite, et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants illustrent la methods. t 2 3 32X 1 2 3 4 5 6 I I • POPULAR CONTROL OF THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC BY E. R. L GOULD Lecturer on Sorial Economics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University PRESS OF THK !• RIEDKN VVALD CO. BALTIMORE 189s 50727 I . ' / I Copyright by the Author, 1895. 1 H < CONTENTS. Introduction 5 Chapter I. — Legal Basis of the Scandinaviaii System, 9 CiiAi'TER II. — Results of the Scandinavian System . . 34 Chapter III. — The Company System the Best Method of Control 70 Index loi INTRODUCTION. A wise control of the liquor traffic is one of the most pressing social problems of the age. Immoderate drinking is universally recognized as a leading factor in crime, pauperism, and a host of moral evils. Its economic significance is by no means so clearly under- stood. The annual drink bill of the United Kingdom approaches $700,000,000. In the United States not far from $1,000,000,000 are spent evdy year in alco- holic indulgence. In Germany, Austria and France the consumption of both spirituous and malt beverages is progressing at a dangerous pace. Belgium to-day has a liquor-shop for every thirty-nine inhabitants — a situation almost justifying the remark of Quirini, a Venetian envoy in 1505, that there liquor replaces water as the fourth cosmic element. The danger resident in these huge national liquor bills reaches beyond misery and moral degradation. Civilization itself is menaced by the growing economic waste. If it be true — and there seems to be a general opinion to that effect — that excesses are less frequent now than formerly amongst the upper classes, the burden must be falling chiefly upon those who are rela- tively least ible to support it. Certainly the family budget of the wage-earner is not so flexible that liberal expenditures for drink may be made with impunity. So delicately adjusted is the balance that the status of a new generation is largely determined by the quan- tity of liquor the fathers consume. Let all interested IN'TRODUCTION'. in tlic wcllbciiij^ ol" democracy rcineml)cr this tunda- montal fact. In tlie course of official experience I liave had occa- sion to investigate the social condition of several thousand workint^nien's families in Europe and the United States. One result of these pbservations shows that had alcoholic drinks been entirely abjured, each family, on the average, mit»ht have added two more rooms to its habitation. Abstinence consistently fol- lowed by industrial operatives over a period of years would have created a fund sufficient to purchase a home and to appreciably elevate the standard of life. As it is, saloonkeepers, if the figures are representa- tive, receive from this element of the population in five leading countries of the world three-fifths as much as landlords. The liquor interest in recent years has grown to be a factor of considerable political importance. Espe- cially in American cities has its baneful influence been felt. Should the representatives of the traffic gain still greater prestige, as they surely will if not checked, civic life will be corrupted to the roots. Entire disso- ciation is the only safeguard. Few people will deny that the liquor traffic presents grave public dangers. Yet there is wide divergence of views regarding proper methods of control. A most exemplary body of citizens would like to see radical repression attempted by law. A still larger contingent are partisans of a liberty so broad as to be anarchic. Between these two stand the great masses of the people, not committed to any particular doc- trines, well enough disposed, perhaps, but failing to appreciate the urgency of action. They profess them- selves disgusted with fanaticism, while apprehensive INTRODUCTION. i uf the cuasL'(iiicncc.s ol present licensinj^ methods. Is not this the class whicli esi)ecially needs to l)e awak- ened, informed, and rallied in support of a rational r6i>ime? They constitute the majority — in Anj^lo- Saxon countries, at all events — and on them rests the responsibility of initiative. The writer has watched with sympathetic interest the growth of English sentiment in favor of rational temper- ance reform. It has afforded him unbounded pleasure to note the formation of the "Public-house Reform Association." Under the able leadeiship which the movement already commands, more comprehensive action than has hitherto characterized English policy should take place. The present volume has been pre- pared with the purpose of aiding the association in its campaign of education. I esteem it a privilege to help, however humbly, in this good work, and I wish to acknowledge my obligation to that indefatigable worker, the Lord Bishop ofChester, for the opportunity. I have also hoped by this volume, issued, with some verbal changes, in the United States, to further like work on this side of the ocean, which Massachusetts, under the leadership c ' public-spirited temperance reformers, is initiating. Over two years ago the United States Department of Labor sent me to Sweden and Norway, for the purpose of studying and reporting upon the methods of controlling the liquor traffic adopted by those countries. I went there absolutely without prejudice of any sort ; I came away a convert to the system. The testimony of facts and the object-lessons afforded on every hand are conclusive enough to make one feel that the Scandinavian method, as part of a local- option system, is the only really practical means 8 INTRODUCTION. of dealinj; with the liquor evil in this generation. This opinion is fortified by knowledg:e and observation of other systems, gained from nearly five years' exper- ience as an investigator of social problems in Great Britain and on the continent of Europe. It is far in advance, too, of any method which has been tried in populous centres of the United States. I do not regard the Scandinavian plan as perfect, but I do believe it to contain the " promise and the potency " of higher things. It is a measure of progressive reform, sound in principle, operating harmoniously with well-defined laws of social advance, and is easily adaptable to English and American conditions. Its trial will do more than anything else yet suggested to mitigate an intolerable social curse. POPULAR CONTROL OI' THE LIOUOR rRAFMC. CHAPTER I. I.EGAL BASIS OF THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. In Norway the right to distil is granted to citizens living in towns, and to owners and occupiers of land in the country upon which taxes are paid. In Sweden the payment of a tax on ground owned or leased con- fers this privilege. There are exceptions in both countries, which, generally speaking, cover the judi- ciary, clergy, municipal, military, police and fiscal officers. None of these may engage in the manufac- ture of spirits. Distilling apparatus in Norway must have a minimum capacity of twenty-five gallons; no kindred restriction prevails in the sister kingdom. Distilling in both countries is conducted underlicenses granted by the provincial governors, who are appointees of the crown. It may be carried on in Norway during ^nine and a half months, and in Sweden during eight ° months of the year. A tax is levied in Norway every time any distilling is done, counting fifteen days as a minimum time of operation, and 5065 gallons as the assessed production. This provision is aimed at domestic distilling, and is designed to concentrate the business in a few hands. In Sweden the minimum production for the total period of eight months is fixed 10 xIE LIOUOR TRAFFIC. at 2113 gallons. Th ordinary revenue tax is 50 cents per gallon, but a supplemental excise of 10 cents a gallon is assessed whenever the daily product is less than 132 gallons or exceeds 1320 gallons. The gen- eral object of these regulations is to make distilling an industry instead of a domestic pursuit, as it formerly was. Their effect has been to notably diminish the number of manufactories. In Norway only twenty-one distilleries are in operation at the present time. The minimum quantity which distillers may sell at one time is now fixed at 66 gallons in both Norwegian and Swedish law. A sharp distinction is drawn in both countries be- tween the sale of spirituous liquors and of wine and malt beverages. Historically there is a reason for this. When temperance agitation first began, effort was directed solely against the ?buse of spirits, and it was considered distinctly a temperance measureto advo- cate wine and beer as substitutes. Naturally, since public agitation concerned itself so much with the one, the law has been uniquely occupied therewith. Now, however, the encouragement of wine and beer drinking is iir- part of the temperance propaganda, and the ettorts of teetotalers and moderates alike are being directed to secure an effective control of the sale of fermented beverages as well. By " retail and bar trade" is meant traffic in native spirits* in quantities less than 66 gallons at one time. * The native spirit of the Scandinavians is commonly called "braendvin," generally translated into English as "brandy." When, therefore, in the succeeding pages the occasion arises to use this word, it must be understood as referring to a liquor distilled from.potatoes or corn, and containing from 40 to 50 per cent, of alcohol. Till-: SCAXniXAVIAN SYSTEM. II The alcoholic conieiit ranges from 40 to 50 per cent. In Norway the minimum for retail sales is placed at .35 of a quart, while in Sweden it is a little over a quart (1.056 quarts). The licensing system is the underlying principle of the liquor laws of Sweden and Norway, but so modi- fied that prohibition is not only made possible but actually encouraged in rural communities. For the larger municipalities also the door is left wide open to local option, as no license may be granted if the people so express their will through their chosen representa- tives.* In the country the policy is to favor prohibi- tion. So successfully has this latter been carried out that few licenses are in operation in the rural districts of either of the two countries. In Norway a country innkeeper was not obliged to keep spirits on hand, and he was expressly forbidden to sell to any person living v/ithin a radius of 3! miles from his hostelry. Proba- bly few men were thirsty enough to hitch up their horses and drive seven miles or more for the purpose of getting a drink. Under the new law the bar trade in spirits is interdicted in country communities. Rep- resentatives of foreign firms are forbidden to canvass for orders. As far as possible, complete domestic control is secured. The licensing authorities in the cities, towns and villages of both countries are the magistracy, acting with the advice of the municipal representatives or general town meeting, and with the hernial assent ot the governor. The reason why the latter functionary is made a party to the transaction is that, ex officio, he *The Norwegian law of July, 1894, establishes local option by direct vote on the question of license m each coninuinity. (Jn this question both men and women are entitled to vote. 12 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. is the chief of the police system of the province. Hence, when consenting to licensing concessions he will naturally have in mind the facilities offered for policing saloons, and knows better, perhaps, than any one else the records of the applicants. The prevailing method of public control is the so-called " company monopoly." This feature was authorized in Sweden in 1855, and in Norway in 187 1. It has so largely superseded the practice of disposal of licenses at auction that in Norway, to-day, fifty-one towns* and landing places, including all of any impor- tance, have adopted the plan. In Sweden seventy- eight towns have granted the monopoly to brandy companies; in twelve the sale by auction, 2. e. granting individual licenses for retail and bar sale of spirits to those who offered to pay an excise tax of 4 cents a quart on the highest amount of probable sales, with 798^ gallons as a minimum, is still adhered to; in ten there are privileged licenses only, /. e. licenses granted previous to 1855 by royal warrant and good for the lifetime of the holder; and in two small towns prohibi- tion prevails. Generally speaking, in the country pro- hibition, and in the towns, the company system, repre- sent normal conditions. Considering the enormous territorial extent of the two Scandinavian kingdoms and the preponderance of the agricultural population, it is not difficult to see that the majority of the people live under a regime of local prohibition. Local option is in Sweden and Norway a concomitant of the com- pany system. The licensing authorities in any community are authorized to grant a monopoly of the retail and bar *" Towns " here used to include cities and larger centres of population as distinguished from rural communities. THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 13 sale of spirituous liquors to a commercial company formed for the purpose of undertaking them, without any other financial return than a rate of interest on capital invested of 5 per cent, in Norway and 6 per cent, in Sweden. Strictly speaking, the Norwegian law does not fix the rate, the by-laws of the companies prescribing it under the sanction of the Home Depart- ment. Five per cent, has become the customary fir are. All remaining profits go either to the munici- pal treasuries (Sweden) or are applied (Norway) largely to objects of public utility, except 15 per cent, which is paid into the local treasury in lieu of the excise tax on consumption, now abolished. The fundamental idea in the minds of the inaugu- rators was to create a system where the element of private gain should be eliminated from the sale of intoxicating liquors. They meant to attack the evil directly from its economic side, and in this they acted wisely. Any plan to be effective must comprise this feature. Men engage in the hquor traffic, not deliber- ately to ruin their fellowkind, but to make money, and, as a rule, all the money they can. Remove the motive and a bulwark is erected against abuse. It is true that there will be for a time an overflow, but this represents a positive demand for consumption, and can be provided for by the company monopoly plan. Sounder education, temperance propagandism, hy- gienic ameliorations, and a host of other things will so diminish the feeding streams that ultimately the over- flow may entirely cease. Shareholders in companies are, as a rule, persons who have public interests deeply at heart. Never has the stock, as is sometimes alleged, been held for speculative purposes. Three-fourths of the shares of H THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. all the companies in Norway are now owned in hold- ings of one. In Sweden the shares often figure in the list of donations to public and philanthropic institu- tions, the original owners having so disposed of their holdings at death. During recent years, in Norway, shares have sometimes changed hands at a premium. Enemies of the system have cited this as evidence that speculation was rife. A satisfactory explanation is easily found when one understands that the posses- sion of a share has hitherto given the holder the right to vote at the annual distribution of the profits arising from the company's operations. Persons interested in particular institutions naturally sought the privilege of voting in order that due recognition might be given them. The statement that shares have changed hands for speculative purposes is positively ridiculous. In Nor- Wi^y, as I have already pointed out, three-fourths are distributed in holdings of one. The capital stock is always small, both absolutely and in proportion to business done. The Christiania company is capitalized at $42,880, and the Langesund company at $160. They are respectively the largest and smallest in Nor- way. Mr. Koren, in the report of the Massachusetts Legislative Commission, has pointed out that the largest dividends in 1892 were paid to the shareholders in the Christiania company, and they received on the average $15 each. The proportion declines until we reach the Tonsberg company, whose sharetiolders were remunerated at the rate of 13 cents. Small as the share capital of companies is, it is hardly ever fully called in. Frequently not more than cent, is paid up. Interest is receiv ■5 per only the quota paid in. Even though the rate may be TlIK SCANDINAVIAN SVSTKM. 15 slightly higher than current payments by sound finan- cial institutions, it amounts to nothing when we con- sider what a mere pittance individuals receive. There never was a more senseless charge against the Nor- wegian system than tha*^ .vhich intimates that liquor companies are run for the benefit ol shareholders. But what guarantee is there that the companies will entertain a loftier conception of civic responsibilities than individual liquor-sellers ? Will they not seek to exploit the business /r^ bono publico f In the first place, they are public corporations, whose by-laws receive official sanction, and wTio make, one may say, with the licensing authorities certain definite contracts. Secondly, for forgetfulness of public weal or for any breach of trust the governor has the right to withdraw the license privileges without compensation. Approval of the by-laws also being " only for the present," the government ma}'' at any time bring a faithless corpo- ration to a change in policy simply by threatening it with extinction. The control is strict, and one com- pany has been so treated. More frequent necessity has not arisen. Thirdly, the licensing periods are very short, five years in Norway and three years in Sweden, except in the smaller towns, where one year completes the term. Fourthly, the character of men, who, if not precisely from a sense of duty, at least with the certainty of no financial reward, become interested in the liquor traffic, is almost alone a guarantee that philanthropic management will prevail. An intimate relation exists between public authori- ties and the companies. In the first place, as we have already seen, the by-laws are subject to the approval of the magistracy, municipal council, and governor. Closing the public-houses in cases of emergency legally i6 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. r! takes place upon the order of the governor. The sanction of public authority is given to the price-lists. A reduction in the number of licenses may be effected arbitrarily at the end of any licensing period by popu- lar vote. In Norway the appointment of bartenders and other officers is subject to confirmation by the magistrac}'^ and municipal council. In this close alliance there reside a benefit and a danger. Every effort made to enjoin upon the com- panies a proper consideration of public interest and convenience represents the former ; but from the civic standpoint, the intimate intervention of the local gov- ernment, especially in communities where standards of political morality are not as high as they are in ihe Scandinavian peninsula, may lead to serious inconve- nience, and even danger. From these theoretical considerations in the present instance a final appeal must be made to the economic, social, and moral experiences resulting from the operation of the system. Their consideration will assuredly convince an impar- tial person that the practical benefits have far out- weighed the possible drawbacks. Indeed, very few of the latter have ever been realized. Regulations for policing public-houses and retail shops respond, on the whole, to leading requirements. Sales are forbidden to minors — that is, to persons less than fifteen years of age. The companies have volun- tarily and universally raised the limit to eighteen. Retail shops are closed on Sundays and holidays in both countries. Saloons in Norway are shut from I p. m. on Saturday until 8 a. m. on Monday, and for these same hours on days preceding and succeed- ing holidays. On other we.ekdayj? they are open from 8 a. m. to 7.30 p. m., as a rule. In some of the n I ; THE SCANDINAVIAN SVSTEM. 17 towns they close in tlie middle of the day for an hour and a half, the idea being to withdraw from the work- inginan the temptation to drink while goinji^ from his work to his home for the midday meal. In the even- ing- the hour for closing comes so early that carousing is practically an impossibility. Indeed, but little time is left after the working-day is over in which to secure drink at all. In Sweden bars are open on Sundays at mealtimes only, and sales are restricted to guests eating. On weekdays the hours prescribed are 9 a.m. to 10 p. m. in towns and villages, and till 8 p. m. in the country. As regards the morning hour, the governors have authority — and usually exercise it in the case of larger cities — to grant exceptions to this rule, so as to permit the opening of the restaurant-bars at an earlier hour. This, however, is not meant to afford extra opportunity for drinking, but to respond to the needs of unmarried male workers, who from time immemo- rial, in Swedish cities, have been accustomed to take their meals in public-houses. The practice furnishes an explanation to the Swedish law prescribing that cooked food shall be kept on hand in every bar-trade place. "^ In Norway, national customs being different, quite another policy as regards food has been adopted. No loitering whatever is permitted in public-houses; indeed, in the majority of them no seats may be found. As soon as a man has taken his drink he must leave the premises. In .both countries the sale of brandy to intoxicated persons, or in such quantities that intoxica- tion is likely to ensue, is illegal, while debts contracted for liquor are not recoverable. Business is carried "*There are scarcely any bars in Sweden such as one sees in England and the United States. Rather should we calf them "saloon-restaurants." I 1 8 THE MOU(^K 'I"KArFlC. on strictly for cash at all i)l.Aces of sale 'oelonginj^ to the companies. Early-closing is fraught with important and benefi- cent consequences. The saloon is the one social institution with which avast majority of our city popu- lations is intimately acquainted. To its hospitable counter the workingman repairs on pay-day to treat his foreman and his comrades. Before leaving, a fourth part of his weekly wages has disappeared. Enough is saved to pay the rent ; the family must get along somehow with the rest. An evening's convi- viality has to offset restricted nourishment, reduced vitahty, loss of social opportunities to the children, and an ever-widening domestic breach. The Norwe- gian practice of opening sa'oons at eightin the morn- ing on weekdays, and closing them at half past seven — excej-tt Saturdays, when they are shut up at one — is entirely commendable. The temptation to carouse is almost obliterated, for the time and opportunity are lacking. But it is manifestly impossible to insist on such early closing where ordinary licensing prevails. When financial gain plays no part it matters not how short is the period of sale ; but certainly it is not just to charge the saloonkeeper under the private profit system a good round sum for his privilege and then forbid him to ply his trade when he has the best opportunities for making money. The Scandinavian method offers other important advantages for the reformation of what one may call the "saloon habit " of workingpeople. Drinking is not the only — nor, indeed, the principal — motive. The craving for recreation, amusement, and human inter- course brings them to the saloon. The Gothenburg company rendered an important service when it can- THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. '9 didly recognized the need of popular social centres. A part of its profits are annually spent in the mainte- nance of five reading, writing, and club-rooms. Light refreshments are served, hut ministry to the gregari- ous instincts is the raison d'Hre. The attendance record of 217,207 visits in 1892 is a fair measure of appreciation. Not satisfied with this, the company has established an intermediate agency fc inducing workingmen to break away from saloons. It has opened four restaur- ants, where bountiful portions of food are provided at cost price. Cooking is made an art, and the service all that can be wished. Only a single glass of liquor is allowed (on paying for it, of course) at meals ; but so superior have become the attractions of good food that not more than one-third of the customers now think of demanding it. About $1000 annual loss results from running the eating-houses, but the policy indicated furnishes the strongest possible evidence that the company has not forgotten its philanthropic aims. As regards wine and beer, it is only necessary to say that few restrictions are enjoined upon their sale. Licenses are granted for the bar-trade upon payment of an exceedingly small sum. It has been calculated that, for most Norwegian towns, the profits derived from the sale of four bottles daily would amply indem- nify the holder for the cost of his license. Any mer- chant may dispose of beer in bottles. Those who possess brandy licenses have ipso facto the right to dispense fermented beverages. There is no excise tax on either beer or malt. One cannot wonder, there- fore, that with the spirit trade so heavily handicapped, and so large a measure of freedom accorded to fer- 20 IMK F loroK TRAI'I'IC. nientecl beveraj^cs, tlie consumpiion of the latter sliould have <;reatly increased ; still, the ratio of advance is much smaller than in many other countries — the United States, for example. To persons unacquainted with liie liquor trade it appears remarkable that tlie capital stock of tliese brandy monopolizing companies sliould be so small. Were the facts better known, surprise would not be felt, even though the annual balance shoukl frequently represent several times the amount of the capital actually invested. This is a general condition which happens to be particularly well illustrated in the case of Norway and Sweden, as the following statement will show : — Locality. Ciipital Stock. (JrojsUcceipts Net Profits. Christiania $42,880 Ber<'en 21 440 $346,235 197,280 2(58, 5;!0 643,095 860,835 $74,005 43,835 112,2(50 413,495 380,990 Gothenburg 27,470 Stockholm 43,202 Norway (as a whole) 164,210 The figui'es in the columit headed " net profits" in the above table exclude the excise paid annually to the municipality for the license monopoly. In the present instance, one might with perfect propriety include these sums. If one does so, taking Norway as an example, the credit balance would be swelled by $105,955 or to the total of $486,945 instead of $380,990. Reference to the table also shows that the ratio between sales and profits is by no means the same in the four Scandinavian cities. The net surplus is about 64 per cent, of the receipts in Stockholm and 42 per cent, in Gothenburg, while it represents 21 per cent. Till': SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 21 in Christii. iia and 22 per cent, in Bergen. There are several reasons for this, but the principal one is that the consumption per h»^ad of population is greater — indeed, more than double — in the Swedish than in the Norwegian towns. As between Stockholm and Cioth- enburg a readjustment of accounts this particular year explains tlie disparity. The different methods of sub-licensing also exert an influence. In Norway the companies reserve the monopoly of sale of higher- grade spirits, cordials, etc., whereas in Sweden this trade is largely conceded to regular wine merchants, restaurant and hotelkeepers. Interest-charges on large stocks, shrinkage and breakage, absorb consid- erable sums. Again, the Norwegian hotelkeeper has no motive to push the sale of high-grade spirits, since all pecuniary advantages belong to the companies. When Stockholm, profiting by the example of Gothenburg in giving a company the control of the liquor traffic, proposed to buy out and pension off all the publicans and retail dealers in spirits, in order to secure a complete monopoly of the business, the pro- ject met with oppi jition on the ground that to under- take such a financial risk would not only be absurd, but would bankrupt all who were hardy enough to invest their funds in the enterprise. The city perse- vered, however, and after one or two unsuccessful attempts, finally succeeded in arranging with every holder of a license for the surrender of his privilege in return for a life pension, varying, of course, in propor- tion to the value of his business. It was found at the expiration of the first year's operation that, after setting aside a fair amount for reserve and paying a dividend of 6 per cent, to shareholders, besides, of course, meeting all necessary expenses, a sufficient sum remained in f 22 TIIK [JOUOR TRAIFIC. the treasury to liquidate the pensions of all the ex-salocnkeepcrs of Stockholm for two and a half years to come. The by-laws of the various companies are, as has already been noted, subject to the approval of the magistracy, the municipal council, and the governor. Their contents deal mainly with the amount of capital stock and method ot payment for shares, the qualifica- tions and duties of shareholders and directors, the obligations of employees, and rules of internal admin- istration. In Sweden, surviving shareholders are usually given an option on the purchase of shares otfered for sale. The design is to secure a perpetua- tion of management along good lines. The contracts made with such employees of the companies as managers of bars, retail shops and eat- ing houses, show how much the public interest is con- sidered. It is specifically stipulated that all sales shall be on corporation account, the employees deriv- ing absolutely no benefit therefrom. The original practice was different, and the present one was inaug- urated as the result of experience. At Gothenburg, a certain kind of maudlin sympathy dictated the employment of ex bartenders and saloonkeepers as servants of the company. Their salaries were pro- vided for, in part, by a certain percentage on sales. The experiment resulted in abject failure, as might have been foreseen. The keystone of the new r6gime was discouragement of drinking ; and it should have been recognized as absurd to expect men of this class to ignore both the influences of habit and the stimulus of self-interest. Here is the groundwork of the charge first formulated against the Gothenburg company — of disregarding the .public interest, and of permitting THE hCAM)INA\ IAN SVSTKM. 23 pretended philanthropy to de^tjenerate into positive aggrandisement. No conij)any since, so far as I am aware, has ever attempted to pay its employees in any other fashion than a stipuhited sahiry. The conjpen- sation is liberal, conforming closely to prevailinj^'^ busi- ness stipends, and the companies have no difficulty in securing; efficient help. In Sweden where manaj^ers are compelled to keep well-cooked food, non-spirituous beverages, and cij»ars always on hand, the profits from these sales form a substantial jierquisite. They employ their own assist- ants, subject to the approval of the company. The latter allows fixed indemnities — two thirds of which are paid to the servant in cash, while l)oard and lodg- ing stand for the other third. Managers must follow the fixed tariff of prices, and serve liquors in glasses belonging to the company. They are held personally responsible for the observance of all regulations, and are forbidden to sell to minors under eighteen years of age (three years beyond the legal limit) and to intox- icated persons. They are not allowed 10 follow any other occupation whatever during their period of service. Honesty, fidelity and efficiency are the con- ditions of continued employment, as their supposed possession furnishes the sole motive for original appointment. A perfect method of control and account prevents either the giving away or fraudulent disposal of liquors by managers or any of the company's assistants. Civil service rules are applied in promotions, the chief requirement being length of service combined with good conduct. In cases where several individuals pre- sented equal merits on this point, the preference would be given io the employee whose record of sales v^as the lowest. 51 24 THE LIQUOR TKAK I'lC. Besides the nian<igers, each company has inspectors, who [TO around and see that the quahty of the hquor offered for sale is g'ood, exaniijie the control books, and see that rules and regulations are being properly observed. In addition to their salary, managers are allowed the profits resulting from the sale of mineral waters, beer, and cigars, which sale they conduct on their own account. But in Norway, (and s nee October i, 1893, ''1 Gothenburg itself,) recent regulations do not permit employees to receive profits from the sale of beer. Practically, the only other difference between the contracts made with company officials in Sweden and Norway is, that in the latter country the obliga- tion to provide cooked food is not incurred. The motive is quite clear. The habit of the Norwegian workingman is not to take his meals in drinking places, whereas in Sweden the contrary custom prevails. An habitual drunkard, in Norway, finds it increas- ingly difficult to debauch himself. Many companies furnish their bartenders with the names of persons who are sure to " get on a spree " every time they commence to drink. People so blacklisted are generally refused. The law fully justifies the conduct of the company in requiring that liquor shall not be sold to persons already intoxicated, or in such quantities that intoxication is likely to ensue. The smallest glass fires tlie appetite of the habitual drunkard into perfect uncontrollability. No loitering is allowed in Norwegian bars. A cus- tomer, after drinking, must leave the premises forth- with. Up to the present reference has only been made to thf places of bar and retail sale conducted by the co li- THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 25 pany on its own account. Hotels, restaurants, and clubs have not been considered. In this matter a radical difTerence prevails in the practices of the two Scandinavian kinodoms, and, therefore, an explanation of each must be given separately. In Norway the custom is to make the proprietor or lessee of the hotel, restaurant, or club, for the time beincT, an employee of the company. I le is conceded the privilege of selling spirituous liquors, both native and imported, but he may not derive any personal benefit from their sale. As the agent of the company he is paid a salary, but all profits go into the corpora- tion treasury. He likewise puts himself under a heavy bond for the faithful performance of his obliga- tions. This is the general practice. In certain towns, notably In Bergen, no privileges of the kind referred to are conceded. The Swedish practice is to grant sub-licenses to owners or lessees of hotels, restaurants, and bona fide clubs, whose character has been approved by the licensing authorities, for the sale of imported and high grade liquors and, sometimes also " arrac " punch. The companies reserve to themselves, however, the traffic in all spirits or potions compounded therefrom which contain, at 15° Centigrade, more than 23 to 25 per cent, of alcohol. This is uniformly reserved as the monopoly of the company. Neither do the com- panies, in sub-licensing, transfer the sole right of sell- ing the weaker spirits. They do a little of this class of business themselves. The compensation required of holders of sub-licenses is -simply the regularly assessed excise tax upon probable consumption. It is estimated in different fashions. In Stockholm it is liberally guessed at, but in Gothenburg sales' books 26 THE LIOUOR TRAKFIC, have been called for in order that a correct assessment may be made. The company monopoly presents at this point cer- tain advantages which we should do well to consider. By this method of sub-licensing it is possible to sup- press gambling and immorality, which so frequently flourish in connection with saloons. The contracts are made annually with the sub-licensees, and, as we have already seen, the friendly relations between the companies and the public authorities make it easier to interpose special stipulations to prevent any ulterior abuse. As a fact, the companies uniformly do this whenever requested by the police. They sometimes go so far as to withhold the privilege from an indi- vidual who has wilfully or obstinately transgressed the bounds of propriety in the past. An interesting case came under my own observation while in Stockholm. The lessee of a large amuse- ment cafe had, in contravention of his contract with the company and in opposition to the expressed wishes of the police department, conducted the sale of liquor in certain quarters of his premises devoted to amuse- ments. Paying no heed to official remonstrances, he was brought to his senses at the end of the year by the company refusing him a sub-license unless he conformed in every respect to the requirements of the police department. His justitication for the trans- gression was that the sum he was compelled to pay was already so high that he could not recoup himself unless he offered some special attractions with the sale of drinks. In the new contract he was obliged to accept all the conditions imposed, and, as a kind of semi-official penalty, to pay the large amount previ- ously required. THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 27 It should be remarked that the semi-public relations of these brandy companies are such that it is impossible for them to allow any gambling or immoral features in connection with the sale of drink in their own saloons or other places. If they did, considering their avow- edly high aim, public sentiment would be so aroused against them that the monopoly would be very speedily done away with and their existence ended. As regards other places, the method of sub-licensing under such hard-and-fast conditions effectually brings the third party under the control of the police authorities and systematically checks abuses. To say positively, without fear of controversion in the smallest detail, that gambling and sexual immorality have been entirely dissociated from the saloon under the Scandinavian system, is to sound no uncertain note of praise. There exists a sharpdistinction between the methods of distributing the profits of brandy companies in Sweden and Norway. In the latter, appropriations are determined by a committee, in which the share- holders and the public are usually equally represented. Shareholders elect their substitutes, while the municipal council selects the public representatives. The surplus remaining after making provision for all expenses and a 5 per cent, dividend, and after a reserve equal in amount to the capital stock has been once created, was until 1894 awarded to objects of public utility which the municipality was not by law already obliged to support. Under the r.ew law 20 per cent, is retained by the companies to be distributed as formerly, but especially for the promotion" of temperance; 15 per cent, is paid into the municipal treasury as indemnity for the abolished excise on probable consumption in lieu of license fees, and 65 per cent, goes to the general 28 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. government to constitute a special fund for old age pensions or other forms of labor insurance. An analysis of the profits distributed during the decade from 1880 to 1890 shows that the average annual amount was equal to about $320,000. 19 per cent, of this was given to various educational objects, 7 per cent, was awarded to public institutions, 62 per cent, went for the creation or improvement of parks and highways, and ly^^ per cent, was bestowed in the form of subsidies upon various teetotal organizations for the purpose of aiding them in their propaganda. The Norwegian method is salutary from a triple point of view. No part of the surplus can be applied to lessen the general tax- rate, the old excise tax on prob- able consumption having been applied to the poor fund. The fact that in Sweden the local municipal treasury is the chief recipient has been understood by unin- formed or hostile persons to indicate that public cupidity had simply taken the place of private gain in the conduct of the liquor traffic. The charge is quite unfounded, unless with the rarest possible exceptions. Secondly, the sense of local civic responsibility is maintained. Thirdly, the philanthropic energies of a community are stimulated and extended. Fourthly, an universally felt social need, in European countries at least, labor insurance, is about to be provided for. In Sweden a tripartite system of distribution pre- vails. The municipality, as a rule, receives seven- tenths. Two-tenths belong to the general government and one-tenth is accredited to the agricultural society of the neighborhood. Accounts are audited by per- sons representing each of these three parties, and con- sequently there is no loophole for fraud. Stockholm receives eight-tenths, and cities of the third rank get THE SCANDINAVIAN SVSTKM. 29 otiiy five-tenths ; tlie country comnumities in the hitter case profit in,^ from the rehitively smaller share granted to llie urban. Considerations of equity dictate that a portion of the profits shall ^oto the country. Since the company plan was inauj^urated, licenses have practically disap- peared in rural districts, involvin<:^ necessarily the loss of excise. Drinking, however, has not wholly ceased; for peasants coming to town very frequently provide themselves with liquor, and, unfortunately, often take advantage of the rare opportunity to absorb too much. The country communities, therefore, claim that, having lost In two ways by the company system, they are entitled to receive a portion of the profits. Their plea has been admitted. In Sweden farming is the staple occupation and the great source of prosperity. Avji cultural societies have for their object the spread of scientific knowledge in relation to cultivation, the introduction of better breeds of stock, kinds of cereals, etc. Ilence the subsidy. The average annual profits of all Swedish brandy companies during the decade from 1880 to 1S90 were about ^1,600,000. The question of profits of brandy companies under the Scandinavian system has received a great deal of attention. Many temperance people believe that they have here found a vulnerable point. Others take the high ground that public sanction, which, according to the Swedish practice, is in a measure involved, is iniquitous; and that financial resources coming from the sale of drink should be considered a kind of " blood-money." Furthermore, they believe that distributing profits in this fashion entails a certain relief from taxation, and, consequently, the system 30 THK LIQUOR TKAKFIC. becomes fastened more surely and permanently upon the body politic. It is extremely bad morality, they say, for taxpayers to receive benefit in any way from the consumption of drink. Such arq^uments are by no means unreasonable, but in the present instance they do not represent facts. The annual profit-balance is so light in comparison with the total national tax, that the relief accorded the contributor is not much greater than the lowering of the water-line of a large reservoir whence a few buckets have been bailed. A careful investigation upon this point leads me to believe that, far from the tax-bills in any given locality having been reduced as the result of this system of distribution, the community has benefited by increased expenditures upon objects of public utility which otherwise might not have been possible. I do not think it can be suc- cessfully demonstrated that the tax-payers have been relieved by the income from brandy companies. That the companies themselves have no motives to create profits is incontestable. Shareholders can receive no pecuniary advantage beyond that which a 5 per cent, or 6 per cent, dividend upon the amount paid up on their shares confers. Owing to the lucrative character of the business, the sum necessary to pay this is easy enough to gain. The most that can be said is that the municipal purse has been made more open, and public contributions more generous, because of the proceeds received from the sale of liquor. Another purely theoretical objection is that, under the Swedish method, public cupidity simply takes the place of private. The fear is entertained that, once aroused, civic greed may go farther, and show itself more difficult to restrain. The answer to this is evi- dent enough. A community which sought to thrive I T HE SC A N I") I N A V ! A N S\ S T I', M . 31 on the misfortune of its members could not very long exist. The poor-rate and expenses for criminal and reformatory establishments would not be long in al)sorbing far more than the profits derived from the liquor trade, no matter how much the consumption of drink was encouraged. Thus a practical limit exists to the extension of public cupidity. The community if it does wrong has to bear its own burdens ; whereas under the private-profit system the private trader pockets the gains and leaves the evil consequences to the community. From the ethical point of view, it can make no dif- ference whether the beverage which debauches is served by a quasi-public corporation or an individual. But it matters considerably in the economic sense. In the one case, society bears the burden exclusively ; in the other, it is partially recouped. The Scandinavian plan was never designed to prohibit the consumption of liquor, or to eradicate all the evils to which immoderate drinking gives rise ; although attached to a local-option system, it leaves opportunity for local prohibition wherever public opinion demands and supports it. it was particularly intended to check the vice of drunkenness by lessening temptation and by reducing consumption to normal requirements. The public-house is put under such heavy bonds, so to speak, that it is more and more regarded as a reformatory institution, and shunned by self-respect- ing people. The liberty to drink, if one wants to, and has the necessary means to purchase liquor, is fully conceded, but abuse of this right is carefully and effect- ually restrained. In short, the methods employed are educational rather than repressive. The end sought is the reformation of popular habits, and it is reached 32 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. by a series of evolutionary stages, each one of which finds sanction in advancing i)nl)lic sentiment. Probably no system for distril)Uiino ilie profits of the liquor trade could be devised .vhich would be entirely free from theoretical objections or practical difificulties. Neither of the plans adopted in Sweden and Norway measures up to an ideal standard. F'inland has tried a compromise which is worthy of mention. The surplus is given, one-half to the town in whicli the brandy company is located, one fourth to the country communities of the province in proportion to popula- tion, one-eighth to the local agricultural societies, and one-eighth to the company itself. The apportionment t ) urban and rural districts, three-fourths of the entire sum, must be distributed amongst local objects of public utility, those aiming at the promotion of temperance, public health and education, and the care of the poor, having the first claim. The part given to agricultural societies is spent to further the obvious ends of these organizations. The one-eighth left to the brandy com- pany is expended in the promotion of public welfare, but it may not be given to any object or institution maintained either wholly or in part by municipal taxa- tion. The merits of the Finnish practice are apparent. Liquor money may not be used to relieve local taxa- tion, and the objects for which the major part of it is expended are specified by statute. It is undeniable that a wise disposition of revenues derived from the trade in spirits presents many per- plexing difficulties. I have elsewhere* referred to some of them in discussing the adaptation of the Scan- dinavian system to American needs. Standards of *" Atlantic Monthly," October, 1893, and "The Forum," March, 1894. THE SCANDINAVIAN SVSTICM. 33 civic morality are lower in the United States— and I believe in England, too— than in th ^ Scandinavian peninsula. Such safeguards must be devised that leakage of any kind will be impossible. Disposition of at least the major portion of profits by legal enact- ment seems highly desirable, while the strictest form of public audit is a necessity. ( CHAPTER II. RESULTS OF THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. There is but one satisfactory test of the efficacy of any method of controlling the liquor traffic, and that is the per capita consumption of drink. Even such statistics do not afford an entirely accurate judj^ment. For instance, they cannot show the abuse of liquor, since one is unable to measure the particular part which has produced intoxication. Every customer is by no means an inebriate. Indeed, in some countries such as Denmark, where the annual quantity of spirits drunk per inhabitant is larger than almost anywhere else, the people have a well-deserved reputation for sobriety. There the practice is to drink chiefly at mealtime. Neithjr can we consider consumption of spirits apart from economic conditions. A rise or fall in general prosperity is always accompanied by changes in drinking habits. Particularly when the working classes receive high or low wages will marked fluctua- tions be observed. It is well known that the British Chancellor of the Exchequer has recourse to the ** spirit barometer " in his budgetory estimates of national prosperity. Before seeking to draw inferences from the statistics of consumption of spirits in Sweden and Norway one must understand on what basis they are prepared. Smce the Government regulates the manufacture, the total quantity distilled each year is well known. The difference, too, between exports and imports is easily established ; but in calculating the consumption for any particular year allowance has to be made for a F^ I IHK SCANDINAVIAN SVSTKM. 35 considerable quantity stored away for sonic future time — a quantity which ouj^ht to be credited to the year when it is drunk. Furthermore, it is not known jusf how much alcohol is consumed in the industrial arts. The thin<r which is known absolutely is the quantity sold by the companies. Theaverageannual consumption ofspirituous liquors in Sweden by five-yar periods, beginning with 1856, has been as follows : 1856-60 . 1861-65 . 1866-70 . 1871-75 . Quarts por Inliabltaiit. . 10.03 . 11.31 . 9.40 . 12.47 1876-80 1881-85 1886-90 Quarts per luliahitaut. . 10.67 8.66 • 7.42 Part of the period from 1871-75 falls in the golden age of wage-earners ; work was then abundant and remuneration higher than it has ever been before or since. There is nothing incongruous, therefore, con- sidering what has already been said on the influence of economic conditions, in the sharp advance in alco- holic consumption during these years. After 1876 or 1878 the company system took firm root in the eastern Scandinavian kingdom, and since then there has been a notable diminution in the quantities con- sumed. The influence of the company plan on the consump- t-'on of spirits is better shown in the table given below. 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 Quarts per Iiiliabitant. . 14.2 . . 12.9 ■ . 13.1 . 11.2 . 11.0 . 9.2 . 8.5 . 9.4 . 8.4 . 7.1 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 Quarts per Inhabitant. . . 8.5 . . 8.6 . . 8.2 . . 7.3 . . 7.0 . . 6.5 . . 7.3 . , 6.7 . . 6.8 36 Till': I.IOLOU TKAl ric. In 1874, the first conii)any, tlie riothenl)urjr, re- ceived a monopoly of retail- as well as bar-trade. Beginninj; with that year and closing with 1892, the latest date for which statistics are available, we see that the per capita consumption declined more than one-half. Is not this a marvellous showinj^? If not, it is at least an exhibition which no country in the world with a different method of control can present. The ques- tion of absolute CjUantity of spirits drunk per individual is not relevant. It is improvement in drinking habits which must be considered. In 1874, with but one leading company in possession of a monopoly of retail and bar-trade within its circumscription (except five privileged licenses which have not yet been given), Sweden occupied the second place as regards per capita consumption of spirits amongst the twelve most civilized countries in the world. To-day her place is about half-way down the list. That this result has been reached against the formidable hindrances of national customs and of climate affords powerful testi- mony in favor of the system. Credit cannot h ' -^i^iven to Governmental control of manufacture, becjiuse pri- vate distilling was abolished nearly twenty years earlier, /. e. in 1855. Let it be remembered, too, that only 60 per cent, of the entire sales of spirits in Sweden (companies have no monopoly of wholesale trade) is controlled by the companies. Norway makes a still better showing. National drinking customs were not so fixed as in Sweden, but the influences of climate are the same. The low limit of monopoly, extending only to \o\ gallons at one purchase, has been a very serious handicap. Never- theless, from 1876, when the companies began really • (• li llli: SC.WDINVWIAN SVSTI'M. 37 to take root, to 1892, when they sold slightly more than lialfof all the spirits dispensed, per capita con- sumption diminished from 7 to 3,^ quarts, or, as if emulatitifj the record of the sister kingdom, more than one-half. The followinj^ table ^ivcs tlie average con- sumption per individual, and the percentage of com- panies' sales each year. Totftlcon- I'nr cont.of caloH 1 Total con- I'er cent, of salon Tears. suiiiiitlon per by <'(i!iipiinlcs of Voars. P)im|>tl(>ii per by C()ni|iaiili'8 of laliuliltuut. toliil suit's. i 1 Inliiibiliint. total salcH. (juiirts. liuiirtH. 1876 7.0 8.3 1885 3.7 31.9 1877 C.3 14.8 ■1886 8.2 41.3 1878 4.7 22.3 '1887 3.0 43.4 1879 3.4 24.5 1888 3.1: 40.1 1880 4.1 21.1 ;1889 8.4 41.8 1881 3.2 30.1 .890 8.8 49.1 1882 4.0 25.3 il891 8.8 42.9 1883 8.5 34.1 'l892 8.3 51.3 1884 3.7 34.2 Concurrently with the growth of the company system there has been a notable diminution in the per capita consumption of spirits. When the companies made one-twelfth of all the sales, the average individual drank 7 quarts, reckoned at 50 per cent, of alcohol, per annum. When they did one-half of the business the same individual consumed but 3.^ quarts. Is there not here, again, strong ground for asserting that the Norwegian method of control has caused a notable decline in consumption? The decrease has not been steady from year to year. Variations have taken place, notably between 1879 and 1880, between 1881 and 18S2, and again in more recent years. Almost uniformly, a rise in per capita con- sumption has betn accompanied by a relative decrease of business done during that year by the companies. 1^ 38 THE LIOUOR TRAFFIC. Whatever was the cause, the advance, therefore, could not have been due to any laxity on their part or to any greater drinking by their patrons. Let us note that in 1880 the companies sold but 21. i per cent, of the total quantity, whereas in 1879 they dispensed 24.5 per cent. In the meantime consumption advanced from 3.4 to 4.1 quarts per inhabitant. Again, in 1881 they monopolized 30.1 per cent, of the total trade. 'Wi^ per capita consumption was then 3.2 quarts; but in 1882, when the business declined to 25.3 per cent., consumption rose to four quarts. In 1887, when per capita consumption was the lowest, the companies* proportion of total sales reached almost the highest point it has yet attained. With that proportion abso- lutely the highest, as in 1892, individual consumption is infinitesimally near low-water mark. To-day spirit- drinking in relation to population is less current in Norway than in almost any other civilized country. Divorcing money-making from the saloon and retail spirit business — in other words, the Scandi- navian company plan — furnishes incontestably the reason why nations like Sweden and Norway, even though heavily handicapped by climate and hard- drinking customs, are nevertheless able to show a remarkable decrease in consumption, while other countries which allow private profits to be made are being slowly submerged by the alcoholic tide. Mr. John Graham Brooks, one of the Massachusetts Legis- lative Commission, has strikingly illustrated this fact in a diagram which will repay careful study. The figures cover practically the same period, except in the case of Austria, so that prevailing economic con- ditions — that powerful disturbing factor — may be adjudged fairly similar. ■* rr, C5 00 m A M H to C S5 O HI H (^ % C Shi CS Em n < if c S5 CI cs 30 I- 00 cs CO I— Ico CO 2; C 30 ,00 00 30 I- 00 Si 00 1^ CO CO 00 -3 o > o> in cj O 00 CO CO a GO >« OS a o "•"Sis-? 2S e- »n o ^1 40 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. ,1 ' Are these coincidences purely accidental ? He would be a bold man who would answer affirmatively. Prohibitionist exponents of temperance have some- times been misled into asserting that improved con- ditions in Norway and Sweden are most largely to be credited to the growth of total abstinence. The teeto- tallers are reliably estimated to number about 300,000 to 350,000 in the two countries. They constitute about 4 to 5 per cent, of the total population. If the marvellous decrease in consumption is due to them, there is no denying the fact that they must have been very hard drinkers previous to conversion. A suppo- sition of this sort only serves to show the absurdity of the plea, especially when coupled with the fact that half of their number are women and children. Total abstinence societies are growing in member- ship and are exercising a certain amount of influence. That they are not more powerful is due to the fact that few -amongst the really influential members of society are adherents. If decreased per capita consumption were due to the efforts of total abstainers, the results ought to be most evident during later times, because it is in recent years that they have grown in number and prestige. We have, on the contrary, a slight increase of liquor- drinking since 1887. It is so small as not to be worth noticing except to dispose of the claim before us. The phenomenon is undoubtedly due to improved econ- omic conditions, as the statistics of small deposits in savings banks show that the masses of the people are in a better position to indulge themselves now than formerly. The company system, in encouraging local option, in reducing temptation, in stamping drinking as a dangerous practice, and in struggling valiantly to I' i \i THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 41 reduce consumption to the lowest limits, ought rather to be considered as a factor in the extension of total abstinence. This is more just than to give an undue measure of credit for the good results accomplished to the propaganda and practice of a comparatively small number of extreme temperance reformers. One might quite as consistently argue that teetotal societies have accomplished nothing in the United States because liquor-drinking has advanced contemporaneously with their increase in membership and activity. Let us cheerfully accord to this body in Scandinavia a due meed of praise, especially where, as in some notable instances, they have worked harmoniously with officials of the local companies to reduce drinking; but let us not credit them with feats they have not accom- plished, and in the very nature of things could not accomplish. If it is teetotalism which is chiefly reducing the con- sumption of spirits, why is it that the same effect is not seen in connection with beer? Drinking malt bever- ages in Sweden and Norway has increased, notwith- standing that they are relatively dearer than spirits. An historical background, now happily passing, reveals a mistaken sentiment which urged beer-drink- ing as a temperance measure. The consequence is that beer, with some exceptions in Norway, is not yet included in the companies' monopoly, its sale is envir- oned with no restrictions worthy of mention, and it has become the responsible factor in preventing a large decrease in drunkenness. Economic conditions have not brought about decreased per capita consumption. They play a part in yearly fluctuations, but, as we have already seen, savings bank returns show that people could now I i 42 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. l! ' drink more than formerly if they would. The growth of beer-drinking, a much more expensive habit in Scandinavia, argues towards the same conclusion. To the company system belongs the almost exclu- sive credit for reduced per capita consumption. Elimi- nation of money-making, decrease in places of sale, and almost every reasonable method of regulation that could be adopted, speak for themselves. Many lead- ing firms of distillers and rectifiers of spirits in Sweden " openly state that there has been a constant and marked falling off of consumption of domestic spirits, unaccompanied by a corresponding increase of impor- tations, and attribute it exclusively to the wide adop- tion of the company system." Foreign diplomatic and consular representatives and local police and administrative officers testify with practical unanimity, and from a neutral standpoint, to the all-prevailing influence of the company plan for good. Religious sentiment, growth of education, and the develop- ment of abstinence, fill a place which in another gener- ation will be larger still. The company system Las cleared the ground and prepared the soil for them to take firmer root. Most methods of controlling the liquor traffic yet devised break down when applied to large cities. Will the Scandinavian plan stand this supreme test ? Let us see. Below are the statistics of sales by the Goth- enburg company from 1874 to 1892 : M o o a cq o p en a: K ts H o o H n o H H CO a o p O" OQ P o EH 0. CO bi O OQ W o u o a 3 « ^ 3 .5 S oa3.!-.t; 5 ja O O ^ <M '-^ CC C-l I-- 1— t 1^1 1— 05 o cc" «o CO >-< o cc C5 c: a: Cl JO CJ S'l C-1 CI (M 1— I !— I r-l r-1 OC OJ t - C O: CO CO CO I- I- I- CO ti -^ c o to CS •.- ^-i 'tiTt<C<JOil--iO'*Tj<Tf<OOCOrHi— Ii-hC1<MCOi— I CjC'IClr— It— irHi— (1-^1— (rHi— II— IrHrHi— li—lr-trH c o-a I. 3 i-l I o -i S a .• ^5 "^-tjO COr-tlOCOCOCOiOi-IO(M<MrHOOOOT-ir-t«Oi— I idcdc'^i-JcJoscioJoooocicioocdoo C0iCI:^iOC0C'1C0(Mt>.t-'«0«0O00t^iXiJ>;i-^ i-H rH (M' (M" r-H O Oi CO l--^ t^ t>^ !>•' t~^ :0 lO lO O IC <;OiO<-ir~Tt<i^coiOeOT-HOO<OOt^<MiCi:o COOClCStil^COiCiOi— iiOCOOil^l^Oi-iiO C5»ocococO'riCio?ocO'^c<ieoco «o_^ c<i co lOiXiCOCOOCOl^l^t^COOOOOOiOiOSOOO -3 1 EO »-( O 3 _c< CO 3 O 3 u 0. m <H O OJ 3 C tt-H o a 3 125 So OiOt^i^iOT-ii-^cooocDcoi-tTj^oqc^iT^r-iC^ o 1:0 CO i^ (M* i^ •'i^ CO oi ic ci t^ -rr 00 oo i-J ' rH05l0C0l--05<M05(MC0i-lOOC0I^CDC0lC rHl>.OC0(M00CiOi-lC^J05l0 0_i0 O^CO CD (M i o'^'-Ti— rt^i-rt^co'"-^co"r-rio~co'o t^TtTco^co" TfHTtioiM'fcO'^iooouS'— iioooi^iOi—ieoc^ t^OOOOl-^iO-^-^COtiiCCOCDCOCDCOt^CDlO! <f-i . i> •^rHOC0C0»-l00rHr-ITt<050i-^C0t>.C0OI>; i-l CO CO ^1^ IC W CO CO CO cc' OJ »0 CO* 05 t-^ 05 ' ■< 00 i C^IOSCO'OOO'^OlOCOOCOCOOiCOiCi— irii^; O05CDi0(M0iTffC0C0iM"*ti O^OS^i— 1 >— '_^t^ ■<:frt»cO(Mi-(w000000500i-iC<JCOr-i| • □ .It O a •^1 !S ID P3 CO CO I^ C^ (M X ''J' 05 00 ^ CO 00 r-J t^ l>- 05 ■*' c^i 1-! 16 10 co' co' CO rH r-^ t^ id i>^ ■^r^Cii^oococoi^iocO'tiiOinooosoooo lC»005t-»C0OOC0C00DCiC00;0iC<lr-iOTfi ^cccc':DccaS'(:Scccc<>Ta6't^cfi'':OiDieit-^ai 1-1 00 10 t^ 10 iC 00 10 t^ <M lO 00 Oi CJ 00 (M Oi 10 030iooi^c*::cococoi^ooooaooooi0i0oooo T-T Bar trade. 05 -^ rH 00 <M 10 r-i ■*_ M CO C^l -^ -^ 1^ OJ 10 00 Oi id rH -"iJ Ci -^ co" (M* co' rH id co' I-^ CO 06 Ci rH CONCOOrHCOCiCOOOC^COCOlOCOrHCCCDt-. lO CI CO 10 CO co^'* Oi <^^co rHcoioiococoioo o'"r-rcroo'"t^rH'"io'~id'i^ co'^id'ocTccT— r«!t<"'^^r^Qo" COrHOrHl^OCCOlOiC^-tlCOCO'+llOCOOS-ti COJ^COGOl^l^COiOiCCOCOCOCOCOiOiCiCiO as o lOCOI^OCOSOrHClCO'^lOCOt^COOlOrHCI op t^ r^ t-. i^ 00 00 00 00 CO cc CO 00 CO CO 0; 05 Oi 1 1 ( 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -riocoi-coc?50rHCico-riocct^coc3iO'-i i-i^i^i^i-i-cccocccooococooooooo050: CCCCOOCOCOOOCOXICCCOCOCOCOCOCOOOQOOO " rH T- — . rn ,-, r-i rH rH ,-, ^ 8 u o a o 0) a o OQ •a a <o u <a 9i >, 03 » m 44 THE IJOUOR TRAFFIC. Durine? the period, the total sales of spirits declined more than one-half — 29 quarts per inhabitant, to 14.3. There is a salutary diminution in all branches of the trade — bar, retail, and higher-grade spirits. Drinking in public-houses shows the lar^^est relative decrease. It has been objected that these figures do not give the total actual consumption of spirits in Gothenburg. That is true. There are five privileged license-hold- ers in the city, and statistical returns for them are needed. Mr. Koren, who was recently in Sweden in the interest of the Massachusetts Legislative Commis- sion, has prepared a table which is here incorporated with a few remarks. "As the table given below," says he, "differs some- what from those given in other publications, it is well to state how it has been made up. In order to present as accurate figures of the per capita consumption as possible, it is necessary to add to the population that of four suburbs — forming, in fact, part of the city, though formerly belonging to the country parishes — in which no sale of spirits whatever takes place. The very large floating population {^Gothenburg is the chief port 0/ Swede7i, as well as the base of supply for large country districts') has not been considered. Secondly, to the quantity of liquor sold by the company has been added that disposed of by the licensees having ' burgess' rights,* calculated according to the excise paid by them ; also the quantity sold by the twenty- three wine merchants, according to the license fees exacted from them by the company. But as these dealers estimate that at least one-half of their goods are ship':>ed to points outside of the city, only one-half enters into our figures. From this quantity, however, has been deducted the quarts of higher- grade spirits sold by the company, which are always THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 45 purchased from the wine merchants. In order not to make the estimate too low, the quantity of higher- grade liquor bought by the privileged licensees ironi the same dealers has not been entered. The results thus obtained are as follows": Consumption of LuiUOR in Gotiiknburg, 1875-1892. 1 a. V •a n-o a mate latioi •then I sub 1875 64,978 1876 06,847 1877 69,083 1878 71,749 1879 73,256 1880 75,264 1881 78,695 1882 80,117 1883 85,615 1884 89,173 1885 93,212 1886 97,392 1887 100,958 1888 104,332 1889 108,039 1890 112,264 1891 115,377 1892 117,918 Sold by a K C a o 2 O CO •r. " Quarts. [ Quarts. 1,740,110.8 28,209.8 1,844,739.1 28,209.h 1.801.056.7 30,422.0 1,721,830.6 30,422.0 1,547,276.5 34,570.6 1.401.892.5 34,570.0 1,447,927.7(34,570.6 l,358,094.2i35,953.4 1,484,126 3 35,953.4 1.553.262.6 40,102.0 1.611.915.3 40,102.0 1.655.502.1 42,268.0 1.633.007.4 40,683.0 1.670.564.8 44,909.8 1.657.070.2 14,381.4 1,714,668.8 67,628.8 1,633,688.6J50,827.3 1,523,251. 2153,891. 7 CC m ii ■A O .2 «J S'5 O «H Quarts. 323,582.7 323,582.7 282,097.7 323,582.7 298,691.7 241,304.2 241,995.6 253,063.4 280,714.5 288,011.7 284,863.0 271,035.1 219,793.6 219,793.6 215,038.5 215,038.5 214,510.1 214,510.1 Quarts. Qts. 2,269,490.1 34.9 2,380,431.6 35.6 2,269,119 6 32.8 2,288,132.8; 31.8 2,077,288.5 28.3 1.878.607.4 24.9 1.863.033.5 23.6 1.802.288.1 22.4 1.692.908.2 19.7 1,774,567.9 19.9 1,834,640.41 19.6 1.869.339.3 19.1 1.790.987.6 17.7 1.833.228.4 17.5 1,8(0,532.4 16.6 1,872,216.3 16.6 1,764,915.0 15.2 1,675,874,3 14.2 The facts in this table are even more favorable to the company than the preceding one. The decrease in spirits drunk in Gothenburg was considerably more than one-half from 1875 to 1892. But no tabular state- rnent can do exact justice to bo7ia fide inhabitants. The average citizen, in 1892, did not drink 14.2 quarts of spirits. This is easily demonstrable inferentially, though not measureable statistically. Gothenburg is a large seaport, and a prominent centre of trade and distribution. There is always a large transient popu- 40 TIIK LIQUOR TRAFFIC. if lation, the sailor and fisherman elements of which are hard drinkers. As a seaport town, provisioning of steam, sail, and fishing vessels is largely carried on, and this for our present discussion is a very important matter. Dr. Sigfrid Wieselgren, than whom there is no higher authority in Sweden, illustrates the position of Gothenburg by another striking instance : " In the province of Westmanland there are four little towns, of which the two larger are Westeras, with a population of a little more than 8000, and Sala, with about 6000 inhabitants. In both these towns there are 'brandy companies,' which, during the year 1891-92, sold respectively 350,763 and 326,130 litres — i. e. about 43 litres per head of the population in Westeras, and about 54 litres per head in Sala. Now, are we to believe that there is such an enormous consumption of spirits in these two towns ? By no means. The great sale of these companies is very easily accounted for by the fact that in the whole province there is only one license for the sale of spirits in the country. The sale of spirits in the above mentioned towns thus repre- sents the greater part of the consumption of spirits in the whole province. And the consumption per head of the population in the whole province is found to be 7.24 litres. " Now, if the method of identifying the sale of spirits in a certain place with the consumption of spirits in the same place is unreasonable with regard to Westeras and Sala, it is quite as unreasonable with regard to Gothenburg. According to the same calculation as in the former case, the consumption of spirits in the prov- ince of Gothenburg was for the year in question 8.50 litres per head." The statistics of sales by con'nanies in any town are not a fair measure of individual consumption amongst THE SC.A.NDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 47 citizens. The more important the city is as a trade centre, and the wider the area of no-hcense country districts to which it is tributary, the greater must be the allowance made. Even the small towns suffer in proportion. The advance of prohibition, or practical no-license in the country districts, has cast on them a burden, so far as published statistics of drink con- sumption is concerned, which they are not entitled to bear. Non-understanding of this fact has led to foolish statements comparing, for example, the consumption of spirits in Gothenburg with other places outside the country. Bona fide residents in Gothenburg and Stockholm, in Bergen and Christiania, in reality drink little, if any, more than their compatriots, though sta- tistically, from force of circumstances, they are made to appear less temperate. Below are statistics of sales of the Stockholm com- pany, both as regards absolute quantities and number of quarts per inhabitant, since its organization. Quantity of Liquor Sold tkr Inhabitant from October 1, 1877, to September 30, 1892. Inhabi- tants. Quarts of liquor sold. Quarts per Inhabitant. Years. At bar- trade places. At retail places. Total. 1877-78.. 1878-79.. 1879-80. . 1880-81 . . 1881-82.. 1882-83 1883-84.. 1884-85.. 1885-86 . . 1886-87.. 1887-88. 1888-89.. 1889-90.. 1890-91 . . 1891-92.. 153,528 161,722 163,040 167,868 174,702 182,358 190,842 200,781 211,139 216,807 221,549 228,118 236,350 245,317 248,051 4,308,789.60 4,082,591.47 4,104,705.20 4,145,625.09 4,072,594.04 3,913,585.51 3,710,518.19 3,947,429.19 3,788,060.87 3,775,410.36 3,645,743.65 3,574,102.90 3,722,899.61 3,643,581.12 3,573,512.13 14.61 13.88 13.47 13.82 13.10 9.82 9.01 9.04 8.02 7.79 7.51 6.99 6.86 6.68 6.49 13.46 11.36 11.71 10.88 10.21 11.64 10.43 10.62 9.92 9.62 8.94 8.68 8.88 8.18 7.91 28.07 25.24 25.18 24.70 23.31 21.46 19.44 19.66 17.94 17.41 16.45 15.67 15.74 14.86 14.40 48 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. The l)eneficial effects of the company's operations are set forth in the following statement from the annual report of the brandy company. Possessing 170 licenses to sell over the bar, in the year 1892, it made use of but 63 on its own account for the sale of native spirits, transferring 80 to other parties, to be utilized in traffic in higher-grade liquors. Twenty-seven it did not utilize at all. As regards retail licenses, possessing 90, it made use of 27, transferred 51, and made no use of 12. The sale of liquor over the bar in 1877, when the company first came into existence, was 14.61 quarts per inhabitant. Successive years mark an almost uniform decline, until in the last fiscal year low-water mark was reached at 6.49 quarts per capita. In the same way, the retail sales have declined from 13.46 quarts per inhabitant in 1877 to 7.91 quarts at the time when the last annual report was prepared. Taking these two together, we find that the total consumption per inhabitant, which in 1877 was 28.07 quarts, now amounts to but a little more than half this amount, namely, 14.40 quarts. The preceding table does not include the sales made by the sub-licensees. The fees paid by the latter vary somewhat in proportion to the business done. As the amounts received annually by the company for its con- cessions show a decrease rather than an increase, it seems reasonable to suppose that there has been no increase in the amount of liquor consumed on the premises of sub-licensees. Borrowing the table from the report of the Massa- chusetts Legislative Commission, which has been made up on a similar basis to the one already quoted for Gothenburg, slightly different figures are reached. IME SCANDINAVIAN SVSTKM. 49 The lesson is the same. There has been a marked redaction in individual consumption of spirits. The table covers only the ten-year period from 1882 to 1892. Consumption op Liquor in Stockholm, 1882-1892. YearH. Estimated popula- tion of Stock- holm and surroiiiid- iriK dis- tricts. 1882-83 240.725 1883-84 250,149 1884-85 1885-86 1886-87 261,089 271,928 279.583 1887-88 284,764 1888-89 1889-90 393,070 3011.860 1890-91 804.094 \ 1891-92 308,528 Sold by Company. Quarts. 8,913,585.51 3.710.518 19 3,947,429.19 8,788,666.87 3,775,410.30 3,045,743.65 3,574.102.90 3,722,899.61 3,043,581.12 3.573,512.13 Estimated Sales ol' I'rivato Dealers. Total. Quarts. | 1.690,720 1,090,720| 1.690,720 1,690,72'! 1,690,720 1,690,720 1,637,885 1,690,720 1,585,050' 1,585,050 Quarts. 5,604,305.51 5,401,238.19 5,638,149.19 5,479,386.87 5.466,130.36 5,336.463.65 5,211.987.90 5,413.619.01 5,228,631.12 5,158,562.13 Con- surap- tiou per InhaH itant. 23.28 21.59 21.59 20.15 19.55 18.73 17.84 17.99 17.19 16.71 These figures are far from just to the citizens of Stockholm. Only the inhabitants of the eight sur- rounding parishes have been added to those of the city proper. No account whatever has been taken of the floating population. The history of the formation of the Stockholm com- pany possesses some interest because of the successful application of the principle of compensation, a matter not under purview in America, but which from the traditional and hereditary tendencies of England, must needs be considered there. About the time that the Gothenburg company cotn- menced its operations, the authorities at Stockholm, moved by the increase of drunkenness in their midst, commenced to consi acr the question of liow far the 50 'rill'. F.I(jL(»R I K AI'I'IC. I! company system mij^ht be applied with them. Wlien the municipal council first looked into the matter they found that 367 {)ermanent licenses existed; of tliis number 135 were privileged, and most of them were founded upon " burg^ess rij^hts." None of the latter class could be taken away without the consent or the death of the possessor, and, in the case of those hold- ing^ upon " burgess rij^hts," until the decease of the wife of the one possessing* the privilege. A commis- sion was appointed to consider the legahty of the basis on which a part of the permanent licenses reposed. They reported in favor of a plan allowing life-pensions of not more than $134 annually to holders of licenses by *' burgess rights" who would surrender the privilege. Later a somewhat smaller sum, $120.60, was offered as an annuity to the holders of other permanent licenses. As might have been expected, this offer did not meet with much success, for the reason that the suggested compensation was inadequate. Furthermore, no account was taken of the value of separate businesses. All who possessed "burgess rights" did not naturally derive the same income, while as regards permanent licenses some would certainly be more favorably situ- ated than others. It is, therefore, not astonishing to find that in 1875 there still remained 146 permanent licenses, of which 77 were founded on ** burgess rights," which had not been surrendered for the annuities proposed. These, of course, were the most valuable franchises, and probably would never be surrendered unless some greater advantage were offered. Another method was now tried. Instead of waiting for the licensees to take the initiative, the commission set to work to make pri- vate arrangements with each individual holder, and with such success that in a fortnight's time they were 1' I" I IK SCANDINAVIAN S VST KM. 5' able to amioiincf that they held in their hands the ay^recments of 133 licensees to renounce their privi- leges in consideration ol life annuities — which, in the case of " burgess rights," was to be extended to the wife — varying (rotii ;^i34 to $536. The total sum thus given for the possession of these 133 licenses consti- tuted an annual charge upon the municipal treasury at the outset of $33,258.80. So quietly had the matter been arranged that no opportunity was given for com- bination in order to increase the price. The remain- ing thirteen who still held out were, therelore, speedily brought to terms on most advantageous conditions to the city. When the company began operations in October, 1877, with a complete monopoly of all licenses for the conduct of the retail and l}ar sale of spirituous liquors in the city, it seemed to be handicapped with the large annual charge upon it for compensation to the expro- priated license-holders. In fact, many wiseacres at the time predicted financial disaster, but the results of the first year, after paying all expenses and 6 per cent, dividend to the stockholders, showed sufficient surplus to provide for the compensation fund for a considerable period in advance. The annual charge on this account has diminished from year to year, as the old license- holdeis have died off, till eight only survive at the present day. Christiania, the capital of Norway, and a city now numbering about 170,000 people, possesses a brandy company which was organized in July, 1885. Previous to this there were seventy-two saloon licenses in operation, the holders of which also sold liquor to a considerable extent in bottles. Part of these privileges were held for life, and could only be taken I' 52 'J'HK LIOIOK I'K.M-FIC. under the expropriation proceedings authorized by the law of 1880, which gave a life annuity to the previous possessor equal to the average annual profit on his busi- ness durini> the three preceding years. The bar-trade licenses now held by the company number twenty- seven, and the annual charge on account of compen- ;ration to holders of life licenses amounted at the com- mencement to $5,896. It has since been reduced to $3,484, owing to the death of several to whom indem- nities had been adjudged. The company to-day pos- sesses the largest part of the bar trade of the city. It uses fifteen licenses on its own account, and concedes twelve to private hotels and restaurants, whose owners have been approved as managers in the service of the company. Twenty-nine merchants in Christiania, the majority of whom are grocers, hold licenses for retail and whole- sale trade independentl' of the company. At first it was a question of expropriating these also, in order that the company might become the sole retail licensee, but after mature consideration it was decided to leave things as they were, since it was feared that too great a financial burden might ensue. The majority of the holders of these licenses are now old men, and, in the natural course of aff-^irs, at their death their privileges will pass to the possession of the company without payment. The existence of these licenses is a serious draw- back, as are also the special bar-privileges enjoyed by a theatre, an hotel, and two clubs. As a matter of fact, the company dispenses barely 40 per cent, of the spirits sold in bottles and over the bar. Consequently, it is not remarkable that the following table giving per capita consumption of the company's wares does not THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 53 show a decline. There is, indeed, a slight advance. Whether or not more spirits are actually consumed in proportion to population now than formerly, cannot be estimated, as the figures of sale by the twenty-nine merchants, the clubs, the theatre, and the hotel for pre- ceding years are not available. Such a supposition is not at all probable. If true, it would constitute an exception to experience elsewhere. The lesson to be drawn from the table is the importance of entrusting the company with a complete monopoly. Sales from 1886 TO 1891. Quarts of spirits sold. Con- -■ - ■ - sump- Year. tion per At bar-trade At i-etail Total. inhabi- places. places. tant. Quarts. 1886 .. .. 169,848 129.033 298,881 2.2 1887 . . . . 150.123 159.448 309.571 2.3 1888 . . . . 165.466 184.054 349,520 2 5 1889 . . . . 187.274 210,691 397,965 2.8 1890 . . . . 192,380 207,785 400,165 2.6 1891 .. .. 216.589 202,254 418.843 2.8 1892 . . . . 215,796 232,050 448,048 2.7 The increase has been chiefly in the bottle trade, and upon this the growth of Christiania as a seaport and commercial centre has undoubtedly exercised an influence. We come next to Bergen, the second city in Nor- way and its chief seaport. Statistics of the company's total sales are to be seen in the following table. In 1877, the year when opera- tions were commenced, the total sales of spirituous liquors amounted to 282, 1 28 quarts ; in 1892, to 351,695 quarts. In the meantime, however, the population had augmented one-third, so that, notwithstanding the I! 54 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. absolute increase, the conirair.pllon per inhaVjitant declined from 7 quarts in 1877 to 6.12 quarts in 1892. The decline is most noticeable in dram-drmking. Whereas in 1877 the average annual consumption under this head was 2.5 <\\i2,\\.^ pey capita^ in 1892 it was 1.7 quarts. Sales of Brandy in Bergen, 1877 to 1892. -d d Number of Quarts. S2- cc'-dS V- c ,/ ^ rt ^.2 U 5S 2 o'-o-S 2 rH 4-i 3 g s OJ 3 tH 3 OS 1877.. 40,760 103,566 166,810 11,752 5:2,128 7.0 1878.. 41,5l:> 90,962 140,689 7,933 239,584 5.8 1879.. 42,280 73,812 134,291 8,389 216,492 5.1 1880.. 43,062 68,508 136,010 8,123 212,641 4.9 1881.. 43,858 73,574 147,603 8,526 229,703 5.2 1882.. 44,669 77,509 156.654 7,025 241,248 5.4 1883.. 45,493 78,744 160;i26 7,064 245,934 5.4 1884.. 46,332 81,853 165,761 7,083 254,697 5.5 1885.. 47,995 83,719 159,820 6,091 249,630 5.2 1886.. 48,335 85,629 154,500 11,893 252,022 5.2 1887.. 49,623 86,924 146,220 21,446 254,590 5.1 1888.. 50,902 84,569 139,961 26,351 250,881 5.0 1889.. 52,252 86,2,^6 153,052 28,421 267,759 5.1 1890.. 53,686 88,844 177,652 30,894 297,390 5.5 1891.. 55,112 97,101 195,108 39,133 .^31,342 6.0 1892.. 56,513 101,406 204,825 45,464 351,695 6.2 Since 1888 the sales per inhabitant have increased. One cannot necessarily say that local consumption has risen, in view of the enormously increased tourist traffic to Norway in recent years, of which Bergen is the chief point of debarkment, the visits of the British and German fleets, and the enhanced wholesale business of the company. From 1887 to 1892 wholesale sales increased 112 per cent., and no part of them can be 1 i Till-: SCANDINAVIAN' SYSTEM. 55 credited to local consumption. There was likewise an advance of 40 per cent, during the same years in the bottle trade, a very large part of which was not at all due to local consumption, but to the tourist traffic. From 1887 to 1892 sales over the bar increased only 14 per cent., or in exactly the same proportion as the advance in population; this, too, notwithstanding the presence of at least 2500 additional foreign seamen. Mr. Koren has prepared the following table, in vv hich he has deducted one-quarter of the sales annually as extra-local, i. e. outside consumption. This estimate, in my opinion, errs on the side of conservatism, as applied to present conditions. But even if my view be incorrect, the proportion to-day is certainly much greater than it was during the first few years of the company's existence. There has really been a greater decline than the table makes evident. Consumption op LiqijOk in Bergen from 1877 to 1893. Estimated Population. si u 6 Sold in bottles at retail stores. Sold at chief warehouse at retail. Total, deduct in^ one- fourth. 1 « C+J a; j- « — *^ a'r S £ 5 S Quarts. Total average consumption per inhabi- tant. Quarts. Quarts. QviartS- Quarts. Quarts. 1877 40.760 103,566 166,810 11,752 211,596 2.58 5.19 1878 41, 'MS 90.963 140.689 7,938 179.691 2.33 4.32 1879 43.880 73,812 134.391 8,389 162.369 1.79 3.84 1880 43.063 68,508 136,010 8,128 159,480.7 1.61 3.7 1881 48,858 73,574 147.603 8,526 172,277.8 1.70 3.93 1883 44,669 77.569 156.654 7,025 180,986 1.74 4.05 1883 45.493 78,744 160,136 7,004 184,450.5 1.73 4.05 1884 46,333 81,858 165,761 7.083 191,022.7 1.76 4.13 1885 47,995 83.719 159.830 6.091 187.222.5 1.79 3.90 1886 48,335 85.629 154.300 11,893 189.010.5 1.76 3.91 1887 49,633 86,924 146.220 21.146 190.717.5 1.74 3.84 1888 50.903 84,569 139.961 26.851 188.160.7 1.65 3.69 1889 58,353 86,286 153.052 28.421 200,819.2 1.64 8.84 1890 53,686 88.844 177.653 80.894 228,042.5 1.64 4.15 1891 55,113 97.100 195.109 89.133 248,506 5 1.75 ' 4.50 1893 56.513 101,406 204,825 45,464 268.772.4 1.79 4.60 56 THE LIOUOR TRAFFIC. The late Mr. Thomas M. Wilson, of Bergen, gave in the Labour Prophetiox September, TS93, ^n interest- ing account of the operation of the company system in Christianssand, which is here reproduced. He says: " The first Norwegian controlling society was estab- lished in the town of Christianssand, and commenced to operate on January ist, 1872. The population of the town was 11,600, and the population of the rural district, which drew its supply of spirits from the town, was approximately 53,000. Both populations may be described as having been very intemperate. Only the urban population, of course, became directly subject to the society's control, while the rural population continued to have spirits in wholesale quantities des- patched into the country for home consumption as before, the society being unable to exercise control on that wholesale trade. In 1872 the entire wholesale consumption of spirits supplied by private wholesale traders was 78,897 litres, and by the society 10,263 litres: together, 89,160 litres. The total consumption of spirits in Christianssand and the rural district, whole- sale and retail, was, in 1872, 224,627 litres, while the corresponding consumption had fallen in 1892 to 133,806 litres, that is equal to a reduction of more than 40 per cent. In 1892 the consumption was unduly increased, in consequence of a very large influx of the roughest class of laborers, that followed upon the com- mencement of the construction of a railway and a con- flagration that destroyed half the town. If we com- pare the consumption of 1891 with that of 1872, and that is, under the circumstances, the truest guide, we find that the consumption in 1891 was 115,890 litres, or a reduction of a little more than 48 per cent. "The society's share capital is $11,110, but only half has been called up. The working capital is i THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 57 therefore only $5,555, and was held in 1892 by 68 shareholders. The net profit on the capital employed was, in the first year's operations, $13,410, or close upon 342 per cent. "The number of municipal spirit licenses was fixed at eight. The society acquired the monopoly of them, but only exercised five, and have since reduced the number to four. It now has three ordinary spirit bars, and one shop for sale in bottles and wholesale quantities. " The reduction in consumption that followed on the introduction of control was immediately accompanied by beneficent results in relation to crime, poor relief, savings banks, increased consumption of current domestic necessaries, etc., which all indicated great advantages derived from control. Fcr instance, the annual average of criminal cases for the five preceding years was 71, and it fell at once to 47. The annual average of police offenses connected with drunkenness was, in the five preceding years, 97, and it at once fell to 56. Cases of picking the pockets of intoxicated persons, previously a common ofiense, entirely ceased. " At first the society kept its premises open for the full number of hours permitted by the licensing law — viz., from 8 A. M. till 10 P.M., that is, 14 hours. Now it only keeps them open for 9J hours — viz., 9 A. M. till noon, and 1.30 till 8 P. M. — the retail shop being closed at 7.30 P. M. "The Christianssand Society's bar sales, which in 1872 were 41,376 litres, had fallen in 1876 to 32,387 litres, although the total sales, which in 1872 were 224,627 litres, had risen in 1876 to 269,046 litres. The times had in that quinquennial period been very flour- ishing, especially in the rural districts. There was 5« THE LIOUOK TRAFFIC. abundance of employment at previously unknown high wages ; yet it is a striking and satisfactory circumstance to note that, in spite of the increased total consump- tion, the bar sales were greatly reduced, as it is the bar sales that afford the truest guide to the effects of control. "In the 21 years the society has operated it has earned net profits to the amount of $273,620.68, which have all gone, or will yet go, to support objects of public benefit and utility which are not statutory burdens on the local taxpayers. To show the nature of the objects of ' public benefit and utility,' I will name a few : Workmen's Union Evening School ; School of Cook- ery ; Board and Lodging for Diligent Board School Children during their Holidays in the Country ; Chris- tianssand School of Industry ; Christianssand Tech- nical School ; Boys' Industrial School ; Workmen's Union Library; Cathedral S'^hool Library and Museum; Board Schools Pupils' Library; Town's Library; numerous Abstinence Societies, Good Tem- plar Lodges, and Blue Ribbonmen Societies ; Sick Nurses' Institution; Magdalene Refuge; Discharged Female Prisoners' Homes ; Prisoners' Aid Society ; Public Sea Baths for Men ; Public Sea Baths for V/omen; Quay Laborers' Waiting Rooms; Work- men's Union Sick Fund ; Industrial Society for Needy Women ; Workmen's Union Asylum ; numerous Asy- lums for Children, and a host of other similar benefi- cial objects too numerous to detail here. " The burgomaster and the superintendent of police, and the British and American consuls in Christians- sand, have been good enough to favor me quite recently with their opinions in writing of what the local con- trolling society has effected, and they unanimously report that the operations of the society have unques- 1 THE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 59 \ tionably been of immense benefit in the promotion of temperance and sobriety in the locality. " Personally, I have known this town well for 34 years, and my experience quite coincides with that of the four gentlemen nafned." The Massachusetts Legislative Commission has pub- lished a table giving a resume oi' per capita consump- tion during the differen': years. It differs somewhat in the estimate of the number of persons within the area of the company's operations. Like Mr. Wilson, Mr. Koren attributes the sharp rise in bar drinking during 1892 mainly to the influx of laborers employed in rebuilding the town after the disastrous fire. Consumption of Liquor in Ciiristianssand, 1872-92. 1 ■ ^ a.2'0 u t- AT Sold by the Company 1 i^ AS at: 0J5 02 =* 1— 1 03 at: 6 Quarts. < Quarts. Quarts. Quarts. Quarts. Qts. 1872 31,897 42,874 97,498 10,635 81,753 232,760 7.29 1873 32,225 46,103 111,742 12,808 126,040 296,693 9.20 1874 32,405 41,314 127,187 6,075 152,110 326,686 10.08 1875 32,737 38,294 137.284 11,575 123,746 310,879 9.49 1876 32,998 33,560 128,871 6,768 109,589 278,789 8.44 1877 33,316 37,965 125,977 2,763 116,502 283,207 8.50 1878 33,501 40,849 109,046 2,227 45,452 197,424 5.89 1879 33,630 37,072 88,694 2,212 49,664 177,642 5.28 1880 33,894 38,354 86,168 1,020 38,064 163,609 4.82 1881 34,164 35,099 94,143 1,689 26,090 157,621 4.61 1882 34,471 21,826.1 100,167.8 2,870 2 36,877.8 161,241.9 4.67 1883 31,684 16,439 102,413.3 3,107.8 48,859.7 170,819.8 4.92 18S4 34,992 15,415 102,493.6 2,287.8 18,611.7 138,808.2 165,144.3 3.96 1885 35,214 16,578.6 97,859.9 1,192.0 49,513.8 4.68 1886 35,262 14,715.6 96,275.9 578.0 21,869.5 133,439 3.77 1887 35,316 13.134.8 88,157.3 681.6 20,757.8 122,731.5 3.47 1888 35,516 13.202.3 86,323.9 528.4 21,899.1 121,953.7 3.43 1889 35,721 13.626 1 87,317.2 305.6 12,652.9 113,961.8 3.19 1890 35,878 14,866.6 100,580.9 696.4 12.664.5 128,788.4 3.58 1891 36,178 18,220.7 98,049.1 253.6 5,937.6 122,461 3.38 1892 37,000i 23,265.5114,917.1 675.2 2,134.5 140,982.7 3.81 i it in J' 60 THE LIQUOR TRAF-'FIC. The number of licenses exploited furnishes in a measure a criterion of the companies' efforts to reduce temptation and to restrict consumption. When the system was inaugurated in 1871 the number of saloon licenses in existence in Norwegian towns and cities was 501 ; to-day but 227 are utilized. Companies have the legal right to use nearly the original number, but they refrain from doing so in the public interest. Expressed m the form of proportion to inh^bitantj, the reduction has been from i for 591 to i for 1413 persons. In the entire country district of Norway but 25 licenses for the sale of spirits remain — i to about 8000 people. Half of these are at the fishing stations in tiie north. Statistics for Sweden are not availtble far enough back to show the full measure of improvement. In 1880 there were 692 inhabitants to one license to sell spirits (both retail and bar licenses are included) ; in 1892 there was but one license to every 1073 people. In the country districts the respective ratios during the same period were i for 13,450 and i for 22,526 persons. Following are tables for Gothenburg, Stockholm and Bergen. They speak for themselves. ft !:! 1! THE SC.'XNDlN.Wl.AN SVSTKM. GOTHENBURG. Licenses Used and Popul.vtion Compared, from October l, 1805, to September 30, 1893. 6i 1 Retail 1 icenses Licenses used for eonsump- Retail licenses used transferred o wriie nier- chants'for tioii (J n the by the the sale of Years. Popula- tion of Gothen- premises. company. higher-Kiade spirits. burg. _ __.__ 0,000 ibi- ts. ■ 0.000 lin- ts. • 0,000 I bi- ts. a 3 ^1 ^ ^ 1> c " a 3 .-1 » e 1 'Z P^-" !2: W "A 0.- 1 865-06 45,750 23 5.0 1866-67 47,332 28 5.9 __ 1867-68 47,898 30 6.3 ... 1868-69 50,438 43 8.5 — — 1869-70 52,526 42 8.0 __^ 1870-71 53,822 43 8.0 — — 1871-72 55,110 42 7.6 — 1872-73 55,986 42 7.5 — . — .— : 873-74 56,909 41 7.2 — _ ,»-. 1874-75 58,307 35 6.0 7 1.2 13 2.2 1875-76 59,986 36 6.0 7 1.2 13 2.2 1876-77 61,505 38 6.2 7 1.1 13 2.1 1877-78 63,391 38 6.0 7 1.1 15 2.4 1878-79 65,697 40 6.1 7 1.1 16 2.4 1879-80 66,844 39 5.8 7 1.0 18 2.7 1880-81 68,477 40 5.8 7 1.0 17 2.5 1881-82 71,533 40 5.6 7 1.0 19 2.7 1882-83 72,555 40 5.5 7 1.0 22 3.0 1883-84 77.653 38 4.9 7 .9 23 3.0 1884-85 80.811 39 4.8 7 .9 23 2.8 1885-86 84,450 40 4.7 7 .8 22 2.6 1886-87 88,230 40 4.5 7 .8 23 2.6 1887-88 91.396 40 4.4 7 .8 23 2.5 1888-89 94,370 40 4.2 7 .7 23 2.4 1889-90 97,677 40 4.1 7 .7 23 2.4 1890-91 101,502 40 3.9 7 23 2.3 1891-92 104.215 40 3.8 7 .7 23 2.2 1892-93 106,350 40 3.8 7 .7 23 2.2 62 TIIK LIQUOR TK.\F!-MC. Since October i, 1868, the company lias held all the licenses for consumption on the premises, with the exception of four houses which have ancient and special privilege for serving superior liquors princi- pally, and from October i, 1874. all the retail licenses have been in the hands of the company. Licenses in Stockholm, 1880 to 1802. Bar -trade. Retail. 1 Licenses vised , <i^ 09 , «3 per 1U,()0() . c a B • inhabitants. Year. d by c ers for adesp m Q CS a S i; J; a K Ilai- trade. Ketail. >> ,0 V 00 or be 3 C e2 m Vi u <L s b ^? ct^ be 3 3 H Company. -3 U u tt-l to a a 3 oa a B 1 hi 00 3 67 ao 20 170 27 ao 12 90 3.1 3 8 1 ** H 1886-87 83 51 2.4 1887-88 67 86 17 170 27 51 12 90 1888-89 66 84 20 170 27 51 12 90 ^_ ^, 1889-90 65 86 19 170 27 51 12 90 ,, , 1 , 1890-91 64 84 22 170 27 51 12 90 __ » „ 1891-92 63 80 27 170 27 51 12 90 2.5 3.2 1.1 2.1 1892-93 63 80 27 170 ""— 10 90 — TlIK SLANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. (53 LlCKNSKS IN Bkkgkn, 1877 TO 1891. CO ;52. >.u rJcicriHi's plT ^j rg, ^ 7 ^*- ^1 w 10,000 Inhubltunts. ^^Z. *:«- c a-a , Year. 1 5 c a O «8 o Ah t :,. O - of VI O 'fi fl <^2 > 2ii ^5 1— ■^ 1877.. 40,760 14 60 3.5 15.0 1878.. 41,512 14 60 .^— „„ ^ 1879.. 42.280 14 60 .— — ...^ 1880.. 43,062 13 60 _ «a^B 1881.. 43.858 13 60 — » ,_^ 1 1882.. 44,669 13 60 — 1883.. 45,493 13 58 2 — « 1884.. 46,332 13 57 3 — 1885.. 47 995 13 56 4 . 1886.. 48,335 13 56 4 — —^ 1887.. 49,623 13 56 4 — «. 1888.. 50,902 13 56 4 — 1889.. 52,252 13 56 4 — 1 1890.. 53.686 13 56 4 ., 1891.. 55.112 13 56 4 2.4 10.4 Entrance of the company upon the field of action has undoubtedly prevented the licenses granted to private individuals for the sale of wine and beer over the bar from keeping pace with the advance in popu- lation. In Christiania and in Christianssand, under the old regime, the ratio of saloon licenses to population was I to i8i6 and i to 1274. In 1892 the respective pro- portions were i to 5516 and i to 2566. Compare the figures for these five Scandinavian towns with cities of the same size in England and America and note the difference. 64 THI': I.IOUOK TKAII'IC. ■ i Only the merest tyro in statistical science would attempt to J4auj»;e the efficiency A' any method for con- troll inj^ the liquor traffic by the number of arrests for drunkenness. Especially will well-informed persons refrain from making international comparisons. Laws relating to drunkenness differ materially, and there is still greater variance of police {)ractice in dealing with offenders. In Sweden the law requires that a person showing signs of being fuddled shall be taken U{). Anglo-Saxon policy is based on the exhibition of utter helplessness or disorderly conduct. Regulations appor- tioning a part of the fines to police funds furnish an artificial incentive, while the progressive popular intol- erance of inebriety which, accompanies a reforming regime plays likewise a most important part. Pub- lished statistics of drunkenness are usually valueless, because they are rarely differentiated to show how many times the same person was arrested. Only such figures can indicate whether the actual number of per- sons drinking to excess is on the increase, or whether professional tipplers are simply indulging more freely. Furthermore, the area to which any system applies must be studied as a whole, and not individual districts alone. It is evident that, if there l)e "no-license" in the country, and " license " in the towns, the former s more jovial inhabitants will utilize occasional visits to the cities to drink to excess. Statistically, though not really, such offenses belong to the places where they are committed. Statistics of drunkenness in Nor^vay are not published for the kingdom as a whole. In Sweden the number of convictions declined from 6.7 per 1000 inhabitants in 1874 to 4.3 in 1891. The advance of prohibition in surrounding country districts has '11 1 1: StANDIN W IAN SVSri-.M. added to the l)iirden of larji»e cities, l)Ut the prime cause of increase, where such has taken place, is the uncontrolled consumption ol beer. All reliable author- ities a^ree in this estimate, and their opinions are confirmed by the statistics of beer drinkinj^^ Con- sumption of malt licjuors, which advanced in Sweden from 1 6 quarts i)er inhabitant in 1874 to 28.2 quarts in 1890, and in Norway from 16.9 quarts per inhabitant in 1 87 1 to 31.2 quarts in 1891, cannot have been with- out potent influence. Is decreased consumption of spirits, which are sold under strict reticulation, or increased consumption of beer which is dispensed without restrictions, in the nature of things more likely to account for drunkenness ? It sliould be remembered in this connection, in reply to the assc'*tion sometimes made that decreased con- sumption of topirits in Scandinavia is offset by the increased quantity of fermented drinks consumed, that the increase of the latter scarcely compares unfavorably with the same in Germany and France, but that in those countries under the private pruf.h system the £07iS7tmptio?i of spirits has 7iearly {in Gernmny^ or quite (in France') doubled, zvhile in Scandi7iavia under the Conipany system it has diminished one-half. In the United States, too, the beer consumption in the corresponding period has increased vastly more than in Scandinavia (from 20.2 quarts per capita in 1871 to 64.32 quarts in 1893), with an increase in spirit con- sumption concurrently. Returning again to the relation of drunkenness to the company system, the opinion of those in positions of admii: strative authority, where good opportunities exist for correct judgment, is that compared with pre- vious conditions, the effect of the existing r6gime has 66 THE I.IOUOR TRAFFIC. been to brin<y about a notable decline in drunkenness and a very marked improvement in general sobriety. The governors of provinces in their last quinquennial reports submitted answers to inquiries in this direction. Twenty-one of them responded that drunkenness had considerably diminished in their respective regions, one that the situation had remained unchanged, one that drunkenness had not diminished, and two that it was difficult to form an opinion. The t stimony of experience, whether from those favorably or unfavor- ably inclined to particular features of the Scandinavian system, is that it has undoubtedly effected an impor- tant reform in drinking habits, particularly of working people. Statistics of pauperism abound with even more treacherous pitfalls for the unwary. Everywhere public sense of responsibility towards the unfortunate has deepened during the last three or four decades. The logical result is chat this class is not only better cared for, but more are being helped. To find the pauper constituency advancing statistically does not necessa- rily argue deterioration of habit, growing failure of self-respect, or the application of sentimental methods in relief. The concentration of population in urban centres represents in laige degree a flocking together of the unfit. Here public institutions to care for those who fail in life's struggle exist in great variety. Methods of enumerating the poor differ in various countries and at diiferent periods. As an illustration, in Sweden during recent years, those receiving gratui- tous hospital or dispensary treatment figure in the pauper record. Take another case showing diverg- ence in systems of registration. In Gothenburg, if the head of a family is heli)ed by having his rei.t paid 'J HE SCANDINAVIAN SYSTEM. 67 from the poor rate, the whole family are inscribed as paupers. Supposing there are eight children and that both parents are alive, there would be ten recipients of relief. If rents were paid in this manner monthly, during eight months the record would show eighty paupers; if weekly, during the same period about 350. Figures which indicate that one person in every nine inhabitants of a thriving commercial city is a pauper ought to arouse suspicion in any discerning mind. Yet the totals have been accepted and quoted by adverse critics in England and the United States as evidence that somehow or other unparalleled poverty is closely connected with the company system. Crime bears a positive relation to drink, but the terms of this relation cannot be mathematically ex- pressed. There is always a tendency among the lapsed, who especially appreciate the value of symp- athy, to lay all their misfortunes to tippling. This remark is made without wishing in the least to cast doubt upon- the belief that drink is a tremendous factor in criminality. In concluding this chapter, a word may be offered on the subject of the surplus revenues arising from the sale of drink. The Norwegian method of distribution possesses one strikingly meritorious quality. Owner- ship of a share of capital stock carries with it the right to vote for representatives on the committee of man- agement, to which belongs the function of apportion- ment of the company's quota. Public interest in the operation of the company is thus widened. It is not far from axiomatic truth to say that whenever civic spirit is aroused, and the attention of that class of the community which makes philanthropy an avocation is enlisted, particular objects of scrutiny will behave circumspectly. 6S THI': LIOUOR TRVI-FIC. In the distribution of surplus revenues under the company system three principal objects should receive generous recognition. The first of these is education, not in its general but in its special phases. Part of the revenues should be appropriated to found kinder- gartens, manual training schools, and schools of indus- trial art. Kindergartens are selected because results testify unimpeachably to the useful moral efifects oi their training. What other agency can boast of a record like that of the San Francisco kindergartens? An investigation, following ten thousand children in after-life, has disclosed the astounding fact that only one kindergarten child has been arrested. Manual training institutions invite support because a boy whose eyes and hands are early trained to trans- late ideas into material objects is not likely later to become a burden to society through inability to earn a living. His mechanical aptitudes become so much capital. Industrial art schools have a claim, in order that scope may be given young women as well as young men to develop higher industrial capacities. Kindergarten and manual training have received too scanty recognition in Anglo-Saxon educational polity. The one represents the ethical, the other the industrial element in education. Neglect of home-training dur- ing the period when the character is chiefly formed, and that environment of childhood inimical to sound physical and moral development which obtains in every large city, emphasize the importance of the one, as the economic benefits of superior craftship delineate the advantages of the other. Saloons minister in two respects to the workingman. They are labor exchanges and social centres. To abolish these without providing substitutes would be THE SCAXDIXAVIAX SYSTEM. 69 .rank injustice. Therefore it becomes necessary to apportion a generous share of the profits of liquor companies for this purpose. To carry out the idea, it is only necessary to have coffee-houses and rooms for reading and entertainment, as well as for hire for social gatherings. Let as many as possible of the recreative features of a gentleman's club be introduced. The saloon should be closed promptly at 7 o'clock, so that, from this time on, the coffee-houses may be the rally- ing-grounds. Soft drinks, light refreshments, news- papers, pool and billiards, draughts and chess, smoking and conversation, should be elements in the entertain- ment. If possible, the attractiveness of the well- equipped modern saloon should be outdone. Let these privileges accompany the purchase of a soft drink or a portion of refreshment, and the American free lunch of to-day will never be regretfully recalled. There ought also to be liberal appropriations for popular evening concerts. These should be held at frequent intervals in different parts of a city, so as to be easily accessible to everybody. The admission fee should be such as the workingman and his family could readily support, and the inevitable deficit made up by subsidies from the liquor fund. Popularization of music and art is of great civilizing importance. Its sociological import, too, is of the highest. It reacts favorably upon family life, and saves male members from the unfortunate or evil associations surrounding saloon and cheap music hall entertain- ments. No class of persons stand in greater need of recreation than working-people, yet to no other is so little a\ailable. The conditions of city life need to be vastly ameliorated in this and other ways before an appreciable diminution of drinking can be brought about. CHAPTER III. THE COMPANY SYSTEM THE BEST METHOD OF CONTROL. It may not be out of place to preface this final chapter with a brief summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the Scandinavian system of control. I. The supreme advantage of the company system is the elimination of private profit from liquor-selling. Through this means, what we may regard as at best a dangerous traffic is taken from the hands of a self- seeking class of persons, frequently of a low type, and always, perhaps, endowed with an inrpcrfect sense of moral responsibility, and given to an organization representing disinterested public welfare. The busi- ness is then carried on with a view of reducing con- sumption to the lowest possible limits. Not infre- quently, as in the case of the Gothenburg company under the administration of Dr. Sigfrid Wiesel^ren, the directing authority is composed of men who abomi- nate the whole business and take charge only from a sense of public duty and in order that they may minimize the evils and ultimately extinguish them. No company can give better evidence of its philan- thropic aim than to place its direction in the hands of a sensible temperance man ; nor ought any high- minded abstainer to shrink from the task. If liquor must be sold — and few, even of the most ardent prohibitionists, will deny that it will continue to be for some time yet— is it not vastly better to take the traffic THE CUM [WW SVSTF.M. 71 from the control of the present lower element of society, representing^ but moderate intelligence and inferior moral perception, and hand it over to reputable men with no economic interest to serve ? Is it not also better to apply the vast profits of the business which now go to enrich a dangerous class, to corrupt politics and to debase social life, to objects of general public utility and towards lessening the burdens entailed by strong drink ? 2. A conspicuous merit is the complete divorcing of the liquor traffic from politics. In these countries the elimination of the liquor element as a political power is complete. The shareholders in the companies are, as a rule, prominent citizens — in Gothenburg, for example, some of the very best known — and this can be said of all the larger communities. In none of them have shares become so concentrated that any- thing like a particular interest could be created. It is true that in some of the smaller towns of Sweden minor abuses have not been effectually guarded against ; but, under the stricter regulations in Norway, pernicious methods of administration are unknown. The employees who deal directly with the practical details of the companies' business are simply paid servants, and none of them, so far as can be learned, hold any position whatever under the city or local governments or have friends or backers therein. Charges of ring " politics in connection with liquor companies may be completely discounted. Especially in Norway is the divorce absolute and complete. 3. The company monopoly has been so administered that a general reduction of the number of licenses has been brought about everywhere. This means lessen- ing of temptation to drink, llie appropriate facts 72 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. ■ir if have already been adverted to in the previous chapter and need not be reiterated. Certainly no nation in the world can show such a low ratio of licenses to population as can Sweden and Norway.. Side by side with the reduction of licenses there has been a marked improvement in the character of the saloons. The sites chosen have been, as a rule, in public places, and they are thus open to the most rigid scrutiny. In Sweden, where sub-licensing is resorted to, the police authorities uniformly avail themselves of the right afforded in the contracts made by the companies with sub-licensees, to imposeconditions which putan effectual stop to gambling or immoral practices in places uhere liquor is sold. It is an important advantage that the companies are directly amenable to public authority and public opinion for the exercise of their trust. 4. A series of efficient checks is interposed against breach of trust, supposing that under the company system there may exist an inclination to commit it. In the first place, the final decision concerning all matters in Sweden, for example, rests with the governor, who is an officer appointed by the crown, and a man of high character and wide administrative knowledge. Secondly, the licenses hold good only during the governor's pleasure. In Norway a faithless corpora- tion may be brought immediately to task simply by the threat of extinguishing it. As has been already shown, this was effectually carried out in the case of one company which was inclined to place the economic interests of the municipality above the social interests of its inhabitants. Thirdly, an efficient co-operation is established between the company and police officials. Blackmail and bribery under such circumstances become an impossibility. Fourthly, the disposition of TiiE cuMI'A^^■ system. n profits, whether under the Swedish or the Norwegian plan, is so provided for tliat fair dealing only can ensue. Fifthly, the general conduct of the business is always open to public inspection and criticism. The require- ment that printed reports of the transactions of the companies in Norway shall be published every year is a salutary measure. Sixthly, the company monopoly secures strict enforcement of legal and police regula- tions in relation to the liquor traffic. 5. The companies have in some measure gone beyond legal requirements in the line of public interest, thus emphasizing their desire to contribute to the public weal. This has been manifest particularly in raising the age of minority from fifteen, where the law puts it, to eighteen, as regards selling drink to young persons, and also in insisting upon immediate cash pay- ment for liquors sold. They have gradually advanced the price of drinks, at the same time reducing their alcoholic contents. vStringent regulations against loit- ering around the company's shops characterize Nor- wegian prescriptions. 6. Early closing under the company system has become a fixed practice. In Norway saloons are closed on Sundays ai.d at those periods of the day when the workin^man is most tempted to drink. It is impossible for him to spend his leisure moments carousing at bars and thus be almost involuntarily led to squander hard-earned wages. Nothing whatever is found in Norwegian saloons which invites to convivi- ality. Generally there are no seats, and the regula- tions, which personal observation leads me to say are strictly enforced, are all designed for the orderly con- duct of the business, and render drinking to excess a very difficult mattei. Earlier closing than the law 74 THK I.IOl'OR TKAFI'IC. required was voluntarily practised to a large extent before the passage of the act of 1894, This measure oblioes discontinuance of the sale of spirits from i P. M. on days before Sundays and holidays until 8A.M. of the week-day following. Withdrawal of the temp- tation to drink on Saturday afternoons — the almost universal pay-day — will ' e frnr!,/hj with great eco- nomic beneiit to the '."agetit porMon 0/ the community. Public authorities may al o ^ *:* v rime limit business hours still further whenever there ar<. 'nusual gather- ings of people. 7. Employees being paid fixed salaries, fiiir in amount, and civil service principles being established in promotion, there is not the same temptation to push the sale of drink ; on the contrary, it is made distinctly an object to act otherwise. 8. All taxes are paid under the company system— a merit which cannot be predicated of every licensing regime. The charge has sometimes been made that the company system has stimulated municipal cupidity. This is groundless. There is a natural and impassable limit to cupidity of this sort which, if overpassed, will bring ruin to any community. Municipal cupidity would mean stimulation of consumption, but the statistical data quoted in the last chapter show that ^^r capita consumption has notably diminished in both Sweden and Norway under the company regime. Were the municipalities anxious to make money directly out of the liquor traffic, the excise tax on the consumption — which, in Sweden, goes entirely to the municipal treasury, apart from the profits of the sale in which the municipality has only a share, and in Norway went, until 1894, to the poor fund, a municipal burden — would be more liberally estimated than it is. '1-111-. COMl'ANV SVSTr.M, 75 The revocation of the charter of the Lanj^esund com- pany furni^he-i fuiMiei refutation of this chari;e. 9. A dist'nctive merit of the Norwegian plan is that indiscri ninate sub-licensint, is unknown. Such privi- lej^zs are granted only as pubhc interest may require, and where a'^ effectual control can he exercised against abuse, in Sweden, where sub-licensing prevails, a good-sized fee is usually stipulated. In Gothenijurg about $700 per annum is the average charge exacted for a sub-license. 10. The assistance rendered financially and iL'r- wise in promoting the cause of temperance, 'm N - way a moderate sum is annually expended i^ . ubsi- dizing temperance societie:>. Under the new 1« v this will be largely increased. In several localir' vs, partic- ularly in Norway, cordial co-operation exisu tetween agencies for the spread of teetotalism and the com- panies. 11. The attitude of the temperance party is particu- larly important. Were the companies not succeeding in their avowed aim and accomplishing successfully the huge task of restricting the evils of the traffic, total abstainers would become their most e-irnest opponents. On the contrary, while they do not desire the system as a permanency, it is equally true that all of the more intelligent abstainers regard it as a salutary agency of progressive reform. There are 30 total abstainers amongst the 238 members of the Lower House of the Swedish Parliament. These, with 40 others, have voted in favor of a prohibitory regime, but they have never officially clamored for the abolition of the exist- ing system. The leader of the prohibition party in the Lower House, and probably the most pronounced temperance man in Sweden, in a letter to me, made use I 70 llll'. ','<;'.()K 'I'RAI'l'lC. I 'I of these significant words : " As to my personal view of the results of the Gothenburg system, I will merely add that with all its defects, it is vastly preferable to free trade in liquors, or to the ordinary licensing sys- tem." Dr. Wieselgren, President of the Swedish Temperance Society, is the most doughty champion of the plan. In Norway, Mr. H. E. Berner, of Chris- tiania, is not only the best authority on the company system, but also one of its most ardent exponents. He is the authority for saying that '* a great mass of abstainers have vigorously united in supporting a proposition recently formulated by a royal commis- sion, which does not advocate abolishing the compa- nies, but would grant them a complete monoply of all sales of spirits." He also says that " the regulations of the companies must be regarded as having worked successfully, and contributed greatly to restrict drunk- enness, while the profits have generally been devoted to the promotion of enlightenment, morality, and proper social spirit." Much capital has been made out of the passage of a resolution at the annual session of the Norwegian Grand Lodge of Good Templars in 1893 which was unfavorable to the company system. The fact has since transpired that this slipped through without the full knowledge of the meeting, an.:' the committee on resolutions has since refused to acknowl- edge it. Mr, Lars O. Jensen, who is one of the most promi- nent members of the order, and at present Right Worthy Grand Templar for Norway, the representa- tive of the society to the recent International Alcoholic Congress at the Hague, and the editor for Norway of the " Internationale Monatschrift," thus writes (his letter is in my possession) concerning the maiier in question: !h rni: c(jmi'anv system. 77 *' This resolution is now, I think, j^enerally considered a mistake, even among the Oood Templars tlieniselves. An old temperance man who is very much opposed to the company system sent a letter to the meeting ask- ing it to adopt the said resolution, which it did. The resolution condemned the system in that it declared that it had failed to materially decrease the consump- '■inn of alcoholic liquors. This same old gentleman wrote to the annual meetings of the Norwegian Total Abstinence Society and the Blue Ribbon Army, but at these meetings no such resolution was carried. As to the attitude of the representative temperance men, I refer you to my paper read before the International Alcoholic Congress at the Hague in 1890. I do think that they almost unanimously favor the company system as against individual licensing, and in this very year (1894) they have done their utmost to have the company system more fully carried out through the law just passed by Parliament." Mr. Sven Aarres- tad, a member of the Norwegian Parliament and editor of the official organ of the Norwegian Total Abstinence Society, has also shown his good feeling by assisting Mr. Berner in passing the new amend- ments to the Norwegian law which will enable the companies to operate more effectively. The attitude of such influential spokesmen of the temperance parties of Sweden and Norway will be deemed by any rational man as fairly conclusive test-ni'-ny. It must not be supposed that total abstaintio are completely satisfied with the plan. They believe, however, that it is the best means of progressive advance, and their eftbrts are directed to reforms in matters of detail rather than to changing the principle. They believe that the educational influence of the regime will, in the 7« Tin: f.lorOK IKAI'I'IC. I ; course of time, make prohibition a possibility. Messrs. Berner and Aarrestad, particularly, are positive in their statements that the company system is not a hin- drance, but a help to ultimate prohibition. Mr. Herner writes, " This view seems also to be acknowledged by the Norwej^ian Total Abstinence Society with its 100,000 members, for at its great annual meeting at Christiania last August the warmest thanks were officially voted to Mr. Aarrestad and mysf^lf for having done our best in passing the new law to more fully carry out the company system." The present efforts of the Scandinavian temperance parties are directed particularly towards divorcing the sale of beer from that of all other merchandise, extending the company monopoly to cover fermented as well as spirituous bev- erages, and changing the law so that after a certain number of years it will be illegal to sell any drink con- taining more than 25 percent, of alcohol. 12, The highest police and administrative officials, as well as foreign and consular diplomatic reprefcentci- tives, have almost unanimously testified in favor of the company system. The former characterize the differ- ence between the individual licensing plan of previous years and the present regime as " the ciiffereace between night and day." The one noteworthy excep- tion to the favorable views of consular officers is found in the superficial and misleading report of Mr. T. Mitchell, the British Consul-General at Christiania. This report precipitated an event which speaks vol- umes for favorable public opinion in Norway. The press teemed with protests, and Mr. Berner was requested by the Norwegian Minister for Home Affairs to prepare an official answer, which was later trans- mitted to the British Foreign Office. Mr. Berner's TIIK COMI'AW s\.sri:M. 79 reply is coiiiplt.'te, and eltcctiially (lls})()ses of tlic ^ros-s misrepresentation ot facts whicli Mr. Mitcliell's rt port contained. The Minister for Home Atfairs liimself forwarded a letter of denial to Councillor U. M. Stevenson, of Glasgow, wliicii was published in the //«?/'«/(/ of that city under the date of April 25th 1893. No further notice, 1 think, nt-ed be accorded Mr. Mitchell's misleading report, except to remark that when a document is officially repudiated directly by one government and indirectly by another, in addi- tion to being protested against by the writer's resident compatriots, it is high time that all who prize fairness and uprightness in controversy should cease quoting it. 13. An undeniably strong evidence of the efficiency of the Scandinavian method of controlling the liquor traffic is, that no single community which has ev( r fried it has afterwards abandoned it. An attempt has been made by unfriendly critics to turn this argument into an admission that the system once introduced cannot be gotten rid of or replaced by anything better. This is a gross perversion of facts. The system remains because communities have found it such a vast improvement on the old individual licensing plan. Publicly expressed approval of leading temperance reformers, indeed of all intelligent classes, as has been already shown, amply proves our contention. It is certainly a open question whether local prohibition under a locai option system as we understand it would do better in any of the larger communities of Scandi- navia, given existing views and contemporary social conditions; but the tiew law of Norway — which for th^^ first time in Scandinavia gives adults over 25 years o( age, including women, the right to vote directly on the question of license — will soon answer the hypo- thetical objection raised. <So THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. 14. Under the new Norwe^^ian law of 1894 the pen- alties for drunkenness have been increased. Hitherto there has been great diversity in local regulations dealing with the offense. At present it looks as if wiser social policy in relation to the victims of drink is about to be inaugurated in Norway than exists any- where else. A royal commission on the reform of the penal law has drafted a new general measure on intoxi- cation, features of v/hich will be compulsory isolation of habitual drunkards in special institutions, and per- mitting the appointment of administrators on their property as in the case of the insane. There are certain disadvantages, arising chiefly from defects in the law, not from maladministration. For these the companies are in nowise responsible. 1. The company mont poly does not extend far enough. In order to achieve a maximum of benefit, fern^ented beverages must also be included. As has already been pointed out in the discussion of the causes of drunkenness during recent years, one effect of restraining spirit-drinking has been greater con- sumption of beer. This is all the more serious since women drink it to a considerable extent, whereas only rarely are they consumers of spirits. Beer, too, is brewed much stronger than formerly. Lack of control over the manufacture and sale of beer is a serious drawback. Fortunately, this is so generall}' recog- nized that we may expect an early change of policy in both Sweden and Norway. 2. A second legal defect is that, at present, the bottle trade in wine and beer in tov/ns and country distri'tj is conducted in connection with general business and without special license. This privilege is bound soon to be abrogated. It is greatly to the credit of the THE COMPANY SYSTEM. 8l companies that more than half of them in Norway have acquired control of the bar trade in beer. They liave done this voluntarily and at considerable financial loss. The present law does not permit companies to monopolize more than the bar trade. 3. A serious delect in Norwegian practice until the law of 1894 was that the limit of wholesale sales was fixed far too low. Swedish policy \v this regard has been much better. Norwegian statistics show that about three-fifths of all the liquors sold in that country have been presumably for home consumption. The limit (ioJ^2 gallons) was sufficiently low to permit grocers to sell spirits to their customers at a minimum figure, and cheaper than the companies' rates. They could do this because only a general business license was required to dispose of spirits at wholesale. Spirits sold in this way were exempt from the regular muni- cipal tax of about 14 cents per gallon. Wholesale sales also represented consumption in country districts where prohibition prevails. People there clubbed together and purchased casks of ioj4 gallons. Divid- ing the contents was not illegal provided the money was collected before the liquor was bought. The law of 1894 makes many beneficent changes. The wholesale minimum is raised to 66 gallons as in vSvveden. Further concessions of wholesale privileges to distillers and to regular business firms are debarred, and those already possessing them are obliged to pay a largely enhanced and progressively advancing tax, calculated in the near future to reach double the present proportions. Disposal of spirits by grocers and other business firms is also checked. There can henceforth be no division of the contents of a barrel among several customers on the spot, because the 82 THE LIOUOR TRAI'-I'IC. whole quantity — 66 gallons as a minimum — must be delivered in one cask to a single buyer and none of it may be consumed on the premises. The size of the amount required to make the lowest wholesale pur- chase — $84 — will materially prevent evasions of the intent of the law. The new law is the outcome of the labors of a royal commission appointed in 1888. Partisans of the exist- ing system, no less than advanced temperance advo- cates, have cordially worked to secure wise modifica- tions. The potent influence exercised by the companies in favor ot reform is a significant testimony to their sense of moral guardianship of public interests. 4. Defects in the Swedish as distinguished from the Norwegian method may be summarized as follows : (a) Less perfect governmental supervision over the business of the companies than exists in Norwa> — a fact which is responsible for neglect of public interests in a few places, chiefly smaller towns. (d) Permitting the sale of beer and spirits on the same premises, .^nd in general allowing employees to reap pecuniary benefits from the former. (^) Permitting, even under existing restrictions, the sale of spirits on Sundays and holidays. 5. A drawback which rarely appears, but which fairness compels me to mention, is that in a few instances the question of profits has been made unde- niably conspicuous. These are indeed notable excep- tions to the well-nigh universal rule. Attention is called to their existence in order to make more appar- ent the contrast. The danger can be easily averted by arranging for a strong system of central supervi- sion. It is safe to say that the alertness of temperance sentiment in England and the United Stales would THE COMPANY SYSTEM. 8-. not permit of the smallest evil of this sort. A triennial referendum, as proposed in the i^.Iassachusetts bill, would keep every company up to its professions. Certain radical temperance reformers, not satisfied with evolutionary advance, express the fear that the company system may please too well and that it may become a permanency. Such people should re-read the fable of che dog- with a bone who saw his shadow in the stream. We have seen already that Messrs. Berner, Aarrestad and other temperance leaders regard the Scandinavian method as i.he precursor to something better still when society shall have been fitted to receive it.* So also do all well-informed persons, no matter of what shade of opinion, reject the notion that liquor-selling has been made more respect- able under the company regime. Individual testimony is peculiarly positive on this point, and besides, numer- ous evidences exist in support of the view. One alone need be cited, as in itself it is fairly conclusive. It refers to decline in the bar-trade. In Gothenburg the quantity of spirits sold over the bar in 1874 represented a consumption of 11.3 quarts per head of population ; in 1892 it was 5.1 quarts, considerably less than half. In Stockholm the appropriate figures are 14.61 quarts during the first year of the company's operations, and 6.49 quarts for 1892. In the Norwegian cities of Bergen and Christianssand the same phenomena are apparent. The record for the former in 1877 was 2.5 quarts per inhabitant ; in 1892 1.7 quarts. P'or the latter 1.34 quarts in 1872, and 0.63 quart twenty *See, in this connection, the Rev. D. N. Eeacli's account of an interview with Mr. IJerner in August, 1S94, given in an article, "The Norwegian System in its Home," in The Ne^u England Magazine for February, 1895. 84 Till': r.IOUOR TRAFFIC. years later. Returns from smaller towns in the two countries teach the same lesson. The late Mr. Thomas M. Wilson, whose 35 years of residence in Norway entitled him to speak authorita- tively, said, " No persons of the better class would dream of goin^^ into a company's bar, and the respect- able working class, desirous of maintaining their posi- tion, avoid them like poison. The fact that customers are subjected to control and may be refused supply at the discretion of the barkeeper, has stamped the com- pany's bars, in the opinion of all classes, as something of a reformatory nature, and they are avoided by all with any pretensions to respectability and self-respect." Dr. Wieselgren is equally positive, averring that when one meets with the assertion that the Scandinavian method has made liquor-drinking respectable, one may safely reply that " suci. has not been the case in Sweden and Norway : the possibility of it is to us an incomprehensible suggestion." The chief of the Good Templars of Norway, Mr. Lars O. Jensen, says: *' When the Gothenburg system was introduced it was feared that this system would throw an air of respect- ability about the drinking customs. This has not been so. On the contrary, it is regarded as a far greater shame to enter a company shop than to enter an ordinary drink-shop." Reduced drinking at the bar has not been accom- panied with increased consumption at home. The figures for retail sale show also a decline, though not in the iiAniC proportion. The pith ot the w hole matter resides here. In the present stag': of r.ocial developi/ent no system can be devised v^h,,'}; will conpletely eradicate the evils to which tlte d-'ink-tratific neces-sarily gives rise ; but rill-: COMPANY' s^'STI•:M. S: wherever spirits are allowed to be inanufactiired and sold, the Scandinavian method of control is the only practical one to adopt. The justice of this assertion is made clear by reference to the experience of the United States, which has been a peculiarly fertile field of experiinent. This experience I have fully related in the Forum for November, 1894, and its salient features are here reproduced. In seven American commonwealths what is known as prohibition is the prevailing form of control. This term indicates 'withdrawing the ri^ht to manufacture and sell spirituous and malt beverages from domiciled residents within the borders. In ihe sense in which it is incorporated in American practice, further regulation of individual conduct is not attempted. A man may buy liquor in another State and have k shij)ped to him, provided it is destined for his own [.rivaf^ use. StUl more, he may purchase it surreptitiously from a fellow-resident without rendering l.imself li.' ble to punishment. It is the manufacturer and the seller, not the consumer of drink, who are placed under the ban. Prohibition is now the law of seven States — ? aine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Iowa, Kansas, orth Dakota and South Dakota. Four of these— iaine, Kansas, and thetwo Dakotas — have prohibition amend- ments to their constitutions. Prohibition h - been enacted and afterward abandoned in Delaw;'' c Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Indiana, xt braska, New York, Illinois and Ohio. All the States in which prohi'/itory legislation obtains to-day are relatively sparsely populated. The largest urban community in any of them is the citv of Des Moines, Iowa, which contains 50,093 people, a. ^Jrding to the last census. But it is in large cities where the S6 TFIE LIOUOR TRAFFIC. liquor traffic is hardest to control. Therefore it seems perfectly fair to make answer to the friends of- prohibition, that the soundness of their views has not been rendered sufficiently apparent from practical experiments. Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, Illinois and Ohio are States containing- large city popu- lations, and these have abandoned legal prohibition. The chief difficulty with all Restrictive measures directed against social vices is to secure their enforce- ment — or, indeed, their moderate obj^ervance — in urban centres. People should take account of this, remembering that virtue can never be inculcated by legal enactment. Its springs are in the human heart, and before they will flow they must be struck with the rod of a quickened intelligence. Marching too far in advance of public sentiment always renders success problematical. Depositing the ballot is too often accompanied on our part by a thrill of satisfaction that duty has been done, whereas it should be understood as having been only just begun. We should reflect that a majority vote for prohibition establishes a new legal misdemeanor, and that unless there is hearty and effective co-operation to secure enforcement, dam- age is more likely to be done than good accomplished. Disrespect for law is the most dangerous of all things under a democratic form of government ; and those who assist in making laws which for one reason or another cannot be enforced, assume weighty respon- sibilities. The control of the liquor traffic is a moral and social question and has no place in the arena of politics. It is greatly to be feared that making prohibition a political issue has compelled the liquor interests to seek political means of defense. But whatever the THE COMPAXV SYSTEM. 87 cause, the result has been an alhance with the domi- nant party, or tlie lower elements of both political parties, which has dej^^raded American politics to the lowest depths,. Another favorite American method <A' dealing with the liquor traffic has been through local option. This, by many, is called prohibition in its more rational form. The advantages claimed are that the limited area to which it applies renders its introduction easier. There is not only a strong local feeling behind it, but concentration of attention upon a limited territory with a greater likelihood of rigorous enforcement. Again, the movement advances slowly, and ground once gained rarely has to be surrendered. Local option represents evolutionary advance, whereas prohibition is cataclysmic. Opponents of local option enumerate aujongst its drawbacks — 1. That drinking is made a local question, whereas it ought to be considered from a national point of view. 2. The ethical basis of the problem is lowered to that of mere expediency. 3. It has only been successful in practice in country districts, and then at the expense of adjoining neigh- borhoods. Local option has been tried in several States. Better results seem to have been achieved in Massachusetts than elsewhere. In several of the Southern States, also, a feeling of satisfaction with its operation has been expressed, though generally the areas to which it has been confined are almost exclusively country districts. The experiences of Michigan and Missouri give a reverse side to the picture. In the former common- 88 TtIF, IJOUOK TKAM-IC. wealth an important contention of critics seems to have been jnstitiecl. The ratio ot' licenses lo population in areas not uiider local option increased during the last census-period 8 per cent. Hi^h license is the method most in favor for large cities where restrictive measures have been i/ractised at all. Advocates claim that it is the only effective forn of control as demonstrated by experience. It may be applied to places where prohibition ai\d local option would both fail, and it reduces 4ie nun.ber of public-houses within measurable limits, both as to number and geographical situation. It is true that, where a really high-license fee has been charged, dram-shops have notably decreai<ed. I ci Omaha, in 1881, the license fee was raised from $100 ir ^looo. At tkat time the ratio of licenses to population was i to 267. In 1891 it was i to 600 The experience of St. Paul is almost equally signifi- cant. During the six years from 1886 to 1892, when a similar change -ok place, the ratio of licenses to population declined from i to 152 to i for 368. In Philadelphia results have been even more remarkable. Previous to the enactment of the Brooks law in 1888 there was i license to every 160 inhabitants. In 1891 the proportion was i to 600. This favorable statistical showmg, be it noted, applies to three States where the license fee is fixed at $1000. Other high-license cities require only $500, and it is undeniably true that no such conspicuously useful results have there been attained. There seems to be somewhere a normal limit of efficiency, and whenever the sum charged is below the line the useful effects of control are lessened. Perhaps the most effective form of high-license pre- vails in Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. To my mind Till' ((t.MPANV SYSTEM. 89 there are two reasons lor this. In the tirst-named State, while the number of permits is not hniited by law, complete discretion is vested in the licensinj^ com- mission, which is constituted of jud,L;;es in courts of secondary instance. Massachusetts has recoiuse to limitation, Boston bein^ allowed i license to every 500 of population, and every other city or town i license to every 1000 persons. Legal limitation of number, and especially a high-class commission of judges, are features which should accompany every high-license regime. Opponents of this plan dispute the fact that it has been much of a success anywhere. They assert that it forges more closely the alliance between liquor and politics. Licensing boards have usually a distinct political element in their composition, so that in the distribution of privileges political bummers may be properly looked after. Furthermore, it is alleged that consolidation of liquor interests more readily occurs and "tied houses" become substitutes for individual taprooms. Finally, those who take the high ground that license fees represent blood-mone}^ so to speak, contend that enhanced revenues are a salve to the con- science of the weak-kneed brother and lessen his prac- tical interest in the suppression of liquor-drinking. The latest form of experiment is that inaugurated by South Carolina under the law ot December 24, 1892. The constitutionality of this measure has recently been affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State. Private liquor-selling is abolished, and a State dispen- sary system substit'ited. At least one of these dispensa- ries is opened in e\t?ry county not under local option, and in the cities ot Charleston and Columbia more are provided for. A State bo-ird of control, composed of the go Tin: i.ioroK TKAII-IC. governor, comptroller-general, and attorney-general, is the highest business authority. A State commis- sioner, who is believed to be an abstainer, is appointed by this body, as well as county boards of control, whicli are composed of three members serving for two years, and who are likewise teetotallers. Dispensaries are opened by the county boards of control upon motion of a majority of freehold voters. The State commissioner purchases the licpiors (under a saving political clause which gives preference to manufacturers and brewers doing business in the State), and the State chemist analyses the beverages to see if they are pure. They are then done up in packages vary- ing from five gallons to one half-pint in size, shipped to the county dispensaries, and sold at prices not exceeding 50 per cent profit. Considerable formality is required in the purchase of drink. The dispenser must demand of his would-be client a written or printed request, properly dated, stating the age and residence of the signer for whose use the liquor is requested, as well as the quantity and kind required. The certificate is then attested and put on file. At first glance one would think that a law which lengthened the time between drinks would not be very popular with a South Carolina governor. The present incumbent, however, in his last annual message, urges the following claims in support of his dispensaiy system : " I. The element of personal profit is destroyed, thereb)' removing the incentive to increased sales. " 2. A pure article is guaranteed, and it is subject to chemical analysis. " 3. The consumer obtains honest measure of stand- ard streny til. THK COMPANY SVSTKM. 9T (( 4. Treatinii^^ is stopped, as the bottles are not opened on the premises. " 5. It is sold only in the daytime. "6. The concomitants of ice, sut^ar, lemons, etc., being removed, there is not the same inclination to drink remaining. The closing ot* the pul)lic house, especially at night, and the prohibition of sale by the drink, destroy the inducements and seductions which have caused so many men and boys to be led astray and enter on the downward course. "7. It is sold only for cash, and there is no longer chalking up for daily drinks against pay-day. The workingman buys his bottle of whiskey on Saturday night, and carries the rest of his wages home. " 8. The local whiskey-rings, which have been a curse to every municipality in the State, and have always controlled municipal elections, have been torn up root and branch, and the influence of the barkeeper as a political manipulator is absolutely destroyed. The police, removed from the control of this debauch- ing element, will enforce the law against evildoing with more vigor, and a higher tone and greater purity in all governmental affairs must result." Were the history of this unique measure not so well known, the contentions of Governor Tillman might be more generally accepted. It is a fact that the plan had its origin in an effort to raise revenue, not in a virtu- ous desire to reduce the consumption of drink. Pro- hibitionists were cajoled into its support by promises that the coming enactment would be a stepping-stone to their ideal. It is much to be feared that the local whiskey-rings which the governor denounces ma\ give place to a State politico-liquor machine. The claim that the consumer will obtain an honest measure of IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) /. ^ ,^% ^ 1.0 1.1 ■^ |I2.8 no ■25 12.2 I U^ 12.0 m 1.25 1.4 U4 ^ 6" - ► /,. s: //, '/ Hiotographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. I4S80 (716) 872-4503 l\ ^<^ •sj \ \ V ^ '^ 92 THE LIQUOR TKArFIC. Ci i li di'nk, standard in strength and quality, may have local grounds for favor, but one can hardly accept it as possessing great moral weight. Taking away from the tippler his ice, his lemons and his sugar may be a hardship ; but it is not a positively reformatory measure — the shadow departs, but the substance remains. But selling only in the daytime and for cash, the abolition of treating, weeding-out gambling-dens and other immoral concomitants of the saloon, are undoubted advantages. In the minds of many people there has been an absurd confounding of this South Carolina experiment with the Scandinavian system of controlling the liquor traffic. Points of similarity do exist, but modes of operation and effects are quite different. The cardinal principle of the South Carolina plan is State monopoly of all sale of drink ; that of the Norwegian is local con- trol through commercial companies, organized often by the best and most patriotic citizens, who renounce all profits and take merely the ordinary rate of interest on the small amount of capital invested. Wherein both of the plans agree, and where both, in my judg- ment, strike at the root of the whole matter, is in eliminating private profit from liquor-selling. But here the parallel almost ceases. The local companies in Norway engage in the traffic in order that they may control it and restrict it until such time as municipalities may do away with 1 icensing for liquor-selling altogether. So well has their aim succeeded that the vast majority of the inhabitants of the Scandinavian peninsula are today under a " no-license" regime. In South Caro- lina the profits go to the State, and the very concep- tion of the measure reposes on the idea of relief to taxpayers. Indeed, Governor Tillman apologetically THE COMPANY SYSTEM. 93 remarks that the revenues are not yet as high as they will be. A State monopoly makes liquor-selling a part of the machinery of the government, and there- fore gives to it a more or less permanent existence. The essence of the other plan is liberty to abolish the traffic whenever a community is ready, but, in the meantime, to regulate it so that the least possible damage may be done. Another most significant dif- ference between the two systems is that State dispen- saries involve regulation of the traffic by political appointees. In Norway every vestige and semblance ot political influence is eliminated. Indeed, to my mind the absolute separation which has been practi- cally efTected between liquor and politics is a conspi- cuous merit. Again, Scandinavian control brings about progressive reform by educating public opinion. The South Carolina plan, being nearly prohibitive in character, is a measure too far in advance of public opinion to be accepted and enforced to-day. The minor points of similarity represent borrowings from Scandinavian practice. They include reduction in the number of places of sale, early closing, selling only for cash, and furnishing pure liquor. Presumably, also, gambling and immorality are divorced from dis- pensaries, as they are in every instance from the com- pany's liquor-shops in Sweden and Norway. The South Carolina plan ofifers avenues of political inter- ference and possibilities of corrupt exploitation. Revenue and partisan convenience may easily become dominant motives. In these vital features it must be distinguished from the Scandinavian system, from which it is often popularly and erroneously supposed to have borrowed its main features. Notwithstanding the variety of American experi- ments in controlling the drink traffic, results show in a 94 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. l'- 1! general way that practically nothing has been accom- plished. In 1850 the consumption of all kinds of liquor averaged 4.08 gallons per inhabitant ; in 1892 it was 17.04 gallons, considerably more than a fourfold increase. During this period the consumption of spirits diminished, it is true, from 2J to li gallons jt7(f;- capUa, but beer-drinking shows an advance from 1.58 to 15.10 gallons per head of population. Wine-drink- ing increased only slightly, viz., from 0.27 to 0.44 gallon per capita. Taking the year 1874 — chosen because at that time the oldest Swedish company, ihe Gothenburg, secured the licenses for the retail sales of spirits in addition to the bar trade, which was conceded it in 1865 — and making a comparison with the present, the consumption of spirits and wines in the United States has remained stationary, but beer-drinking has very much more than doubled. It is true that during the last half-century the United States has received large accessions of populations from countries where beer is the national beverage, and doubtless it will be said that since spirit-drinking has not advanced it is unfair to assume deterioration in habits. It must be conceded, however, that no progress has been made. There is another significant fact. Returns of the prison population in the United States show an increase of 358 persons per million inhabitants during the last census-period. The advance has been greatest in the North Atlantic division, which contains the largest city populations. Exactly what proportion of criminality springs from drink is a question which, so far, has not been accurately determined. The best studies, how- ever, go to show that tippling is a prolific source of wrongdoing ; indeed, probably the most potent factor in petty crime. THE COiMPANY SYSTEM. 95 Here, then, is a summary of the situation. Prohibi- tion, local option, State monopoly, high-license and low-license, have been tried, and most of them during long periods and in many parts of the country. The consumption of liquor has increased and the prison population is rapidly advancing. The proportion of licenses to inhabitants in large cities often now attains disgraceful proportions. In the 257 largest cities the ratio of saloon licenses to inhabitants is i to 250. The alliance between liquor and politics is being drawn closer and closer. There remain three leading alternatives in future action. 1. Hopelessly to give up the struggle, at least for the present, and allow the evil to become unendurable, trusting to a great wave of moral enthusiasm to sweep it entirely away. Municipalities exercise this method to free themselves from political corruption, but it is generally noticed that spasms of virtue come at longer intervals, while relapses follow more speedily and are more severe. Generally speaking, the last condition of the patient is worse than the first. Such doctrines are dangerous in the extreme. They cannot for one moment be admitted in dealing with grave moral issues, because ere long recuperative virtue would be baucbed and silenced. 2. Great numbers of people, while candidly admit- ting that present conditions are not satisfactory, are so wedded to preconceived motions, or attached to a narrow system, that they will not hear of moving out- side of regulation methods. They are partisans of a faith-cure such as prohibition at this time is, when applied to large cities. More, perhaps, believe .1 M M 1. 96 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. in very mild homoeopathic treatment, and so recom- mend high-license, forgetting that a consolidation of liquor interests and the exercise of political favoritism are necessary incidents thereto. Instead of removing it, the impulse of private gain is stimulated by success being rendered uncertain unless business is pushed and resorts made seductive. No-license — or local option, as it is usually called — cannot be successfully enforced in the case of large municipalities unless there is some adjacent community nearby upon which to unload the burden. I doubt very much if Cambridge could have shown such good results did not a bridge span the stretch of water between it and Boston. 3. The third alternative is to study impartially the liquor problem from all points of view, and adopt those methods which have been proven most efficient in practice as measures of progressive, if not ideal, reform. There has been formed recently, with headquarters in the city of New York, a national Committee of Fifty on the study of the liquor problem. Distin- guished men in clerical, professional, academic and business stations, representing all shades of opinion, are banded together with the sound determination to probe the matter rationally and thoroughly. The very names of Presidents Seth Low, Eliot, Oilman, and Andrews; Doctors Billings, Welch, Bowditch, and Chittenden ; Bishops Potter and Vincent, Fathers Doyle and Conaty, and the Reverend Doctors Mun- ger, Peabody, and Felix Adler; Francis A.Walker, Carroll D. Wright, William E. Dodge, W. Byard Cutting, and Robert Treat Paine, are a guarantee of sincere purpose and determined aim. When such men as these and twenty-nine others scarcely less THE COMPANY SYSTEM. 97 distinguished surrender time and attention and con- tribute money and effort to the work, it does not seem unreasonable to hope for good results. Gauj^ing tlie attitude of fellow-members by a personal standard, no question could be approached with greater earnest- ness. Four leading sub-committees will investigate the physiological and pathological effects of alcohol upon the human system, the legislative status of the drink traffic and the success attending various forms of control, economic phases with relation to crime, pauperism, industrial efficiency, and finally, ethical aspects in their broadest extensions. When results are reached and published, the American people will have data for judgment which have never existed before. To my mind, one reason why so little solid advance has hitherto been made is that the liquor problem has been largely dealt with from the stand- point of sentiment. Sentiment is undoubtedly a tre- mendous force, '^ut, like other motive- powers, unless usefully directed, no progress can be made. A loco- motive with furnace blazing and lever drawn may remain at a complete standstill. It must have a track upon which to run if ground is to be traversed and a goal reached. Now, this national Committee of Fifty, if it does nothing else, will certainly lay a track. In the meantime, thoughtful people in the United States are turning to the Scandinavii'n method as the best and safest means of control. The publication in 1893 of the official report which the writer had the honor to make to the United States Department ot Labor struck a responsive chord. The first edition, numbering several thousand, v\as speedily exhausted. The distribution record of this public document dis- closed the gratifying fact that a very huge propor- tion of applicants belonged to the Christian ministry. 98 THE LIQUOR TRAFFIC. A little over a year ago, Massachusetts, which has always taken the lead amongst American States in industrial ;.nd social reform, began lo evince signs of particular interest. A committee of propaganda com- posed of many of the most influential citizens was formed. In this body clergymen of various denomi- nations were liberally represented. Indeed, a p .' ,- lished list of one hundred of the most prominent expo- nents shows more than one-fourth to be ministers. The governor appointed a strong legislative commis- sion to study the question and report a bill. The measure was discussed in the Legislature last spring, but was finally defeated, principally because of the liquor interest, in combination with a few misguided prohibitionists, by one vote. Considering the brief time a measure of such great public importance had to become known and properly understood, it is felt that a great moral victory has been achieved and that final ""ocess ac an early date is reasonably certain. An encouraging feature of the Massachusetts agita- tion is that the hearty co-operation of many of the more intelligent prohibitionists has been enlisted. The chairman of the State prohibition committee and their candidate for Governor in 1890, declared publicly that it seemed to him *' wiser to encourage than to antagonize the movement." Mrs. Mary A. Livermore, the world-renowned champion of woman's progress and a consistent temperance advocate, wrc'., " First, last, and always, I am a prohibitionist, and I favor the Norwegian bill because, if righteously administered, its tendency will be towards prohibition, and if our good temperance people would carefully study the bill I thinly their objections would disappear. I hope the bill will pass." THE COMI'ANV SVSTF.M. 99 Such unqualified endorsements — many more might be quoted— from great leaders in the radical temperance party ought to canst persons of similar views eveiy- where to hesitate before assuming a hostile attitude. Absolutely no sacrifice of principle is demanded The end is the same ; the way of reaching it, if longer, is surer and safer to travel. The liquor interest is bound to fight the Scandina- vian plan to the last, for with them it is a struggle of life and death. Promoters of public weal will favor it. The prohibitionists, if they do not positively hold the balance of power, are at least a potent factor in the con- test. There are numerous instances in the past where this high-minded, self-sacrificing element of the com- munity have been found in alliance with rumsellers to defeat conservative measures of control. While such an attitude involves censure, abuse should be spared. The error has been in judgment, not in motive. What organized bodies of abstainers will do for or against the introduction of the Scandinavian plan is a most important question. Will they help the liquor interest to defeat the scheme and then retire to the hilltop to invoke the judgment of Heaven on all concerned in the traffic ; or will they conceive the truer mission of responsibility for the wisest practicable management of this weighty social matter? Helping along the company system is wise policy as well as a humanitarian act. He must be very obtuse who cannot understand that one or two generations passed with restricted consumption, diminished drunk- enness, fewer temptations to drink, and a wholesome offsetting of the impulses to indulgence by the crea- tion of better social centres for the poor, the best of all vantage-grounds for ultimate annihilation of abuse will l> TFlr. T.IQUOR TRAFFIC. be reached. Countries are jjroanin^ under the liquor curse. Does it not behoove all well-disposed people to cast aside prejudice in order to ^ain substantial betterment? Let not the attitude of abstainers in relation to controlling^ the " unholy thin^ " any longer savor of the conduct of the priest and tht Levite — passinc^ by on the other side. It is no part of m> present purpose to find fault. I wish only to appeal. This volume has been written in the hope of contributing^ to public enlightenment, and so furthering the laudable ends which the Bishop of Chester and his distinguished associates have in view for England ; and likewise in the hope that aid might be given similar workers in Massachusetts, whose public- spirited undertaking will accomplish great good not only for their own State, but also for the whole country. Personally, I believe profoundly in the sys- tem, because it operates educationally, and not solely by force of law. I grant it is not an ideal to those who look upon every sort of alcoholic drinking as unfortu- nate or wrong, but it furnishes the surest path of progress. The true ideal is as far ueyond this system as it is beyond prohibition maintriined by police power : an ideal which cannot be attained until the moral nature of man shall have been so renovated that he will instinctively or rationally shun all resort to evil, and make wise use of everything with which he comes in contact. As a means of education towards so lofty a standard, the Scandinavian plan presents superior advantages. Powerful object-lessons awaken the intel- ligence and move the heart. Best of all, it offers a common meeting-ground where radical and conserva- tive exponents of temperance may join hands with simple wellwishers of the race, to advance momentous human interests. INDKX. Alcdholic content of spirits, lo, 55, 73- American experience, ^5-95. Audit of accounts, 38, 32. l:.ir-tra<le, 10. liars, 16-17. Heer, Sale of, lo, 19, 23, 4!, 78, 80. nerpen — t'apital stock, ao. Company's sales, 54. Ljicnses, 63, Net surplus profits, 20. Total consumption of spirits, 55. I'onus to nianaRers, -.'3. I'y-laws of companies, 15, 22; in advance of law, 16, 23, 73. Capital stock, 14, 20, 56. Cliccks on companies, 15, 73. Christiania — Capital stock, 14, 20. ( 'ompany's sales, 53. (Compensation, 51-52. Licenses in private hands, 52. Net surplus prolits, 20. Shareholders, 13 Cliristianssand, 56-59. Civi<: greed, 28, 30, 74-75. Clubs, 25. Consumption of beer, 20, 41, 65, 94, Consumpt )n of spirits — Decrf se of, 34-42, 83, Extra .oral, 45-46. at Christimssand, 56, 57, 59. " Bergen, 54, 55. " Gothenljiirg, 43, 45. " Stockholm, 47, 48, 49. in Norway, 36-39. " Sweden, 35-36. ('rime, 67, 94. Dispensary system — Advantages claimed for, 90-91. Not to be confounded with Scan- dinavian system, 92-93. Origin of, 91. South Carolina, 89. Distilling, 9, 10, 36. Drunkenness, Arrests for, 64. Decrease of, 65-66. Resulting froin beer-drinking, 65. Early closing, 17-18, 73. Kating-houRcs, 17, ly, (q. Education, 68. Employees ol companies, a-.;-23, 7.). Entert.iinnient of the people, 18-19, 69. Excise, I,aw of, la. Extent of system, la. Extra local consumption, 44-46, 55 50. Food, Provision of, 17, 23. ("lambliiip, 36, 37, 72, i)2. (lOod T<:mpl;irs, 76-77. CotlHMiburg — Capital stock, -O. Decreased consumption, 45. Licenses, 61. Surplus i)rofits, 20. Table of company's sales, 43. Habitual drunkards, 24, 80. High license, 88. Home consumption of spirits, 8(. Hotels, 25. Hours of Ijusiness, 16, 17, 18, 57, 74. Immorality, a6, 27, 72, 92. Inspectors, 24, Interest to shareholders, 13. Kindergartens, 68. Legal defects of system, 80-81. Licenses — Disposal of, II 13. to sell beer, 19, 63. Ratio to population- Hergen, 0^ > Christians'and, 63; Christi- ania, 63; Ciotlrenburg, 61; Stockholm, T.a ; Norway, 60; Sweden, 60; United States, 95. Reduction of, 16, 71-72. Licensing atithorities, 11. " periods, 15, Local option, 87. Man.ngers' salaries, 22, 23. Massachusetts — elTort to introduce Norwegian system, 100. Minors, Sale> to, 123, 73. 6, Mitchell, Report of Consul, 78. Monopoly of trade essential to suc- cess, 53. 102 INDEX. Norway — Capital stock of companies, 30. I)ecr';av;il congiunption of spir- its, 36-39. Net surplus profits, ao. Pauperism, 66-67, I'olitics and litiuor trafTur, 71, 86, 89. I'ricf lists, 16, Priviite profit, Eliiiiination of, 13,38, 39. 70' Profits, Amount of, ao, a8, 39. Profits, l^istrihiition of— Kinlatid, 33. Norway, 13,37-28, 67, 83. Sweden, 27-39, Prohibition, 11, 12, 85 87, Piohihitionisfs, 95, 9^-100. Public authorities and companies, 15-16, a6. Public opinion cfTectivc, 37. Rational reform, 96. Ueadinu rooms, 19. Ready-money payments, 17. Rc' rt-ation of the people, 69. •* Respertable" dr.nking, 83-84. Kcstaurants, 25. Retail trade, 10. ^3, 47, 53. 54. Kural districts, 11, 12, 38, 33. w. spir Saloons, Uses of, 68-69, Shares, 13-13. Shareholders, 13-15. South Carolina Dispensary La 89 93. Stockholm — Capital stock, 20, Compeiisatio' 31, 49-51. Decreased consumption of its, 49. Number of licenses, 63. Sales by company, 47, Surplus profits, 20, Sul)-licensiiiK, 21, 2a, 25, 36, 75, Sunday-clos'HK, 73. Sweden, Consumption of liquor in, 35-36. 'I'echniciil schools, 68. Temperance party , Attitude of, 75-78, 83. "The trade," Attitude of, '^g. Total abstinenre bodies, 40-41, 75-83. United Slates, Consumption of li()nor in, 94. Wholesale trade, 10, 81. Wine, Sale of, 10, 19, 80-81. Illf