CIHM ICIVIH Microfiche Collection de Series microfiches (l\/lonographs) (monographles) Canadian Inttit Jta for Historical Microraproductiont / Inatitut Canadian da microraproductions hittoriquas Technical and Bibliographic Notes / Notes technique et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filnning. Features of this copy which may be bibiiographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming are checked below. n D D D D D D D Coloured covers / Couverture de couleur Covers damaged / Couverture endommagee Covers restored and/or laminated / Couverture restauree et/ou pelllculee Cover title missing / Le titre de couverture manque Coloured maps / Cartes geographiques en couleur Coloured Ink (I.e. other than blue or black) / Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) Coloured plates and/or illustrations / Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material / Reli^ avec d'autres documents Only edition available / Seule edition disponible Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin / La reiiure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsior^ le long de la marge interieure. Blank leaves added during restoratk>ns may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming / II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, torsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont pas 6t6 filmdes. L'Institut a microfilme le meilleur examplaire qu'il lui a ete possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exem- plaire qui sont peut-etre uniques du point de vue bibli- ographique, qui pe'ivent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modifications dens la meth- ode .lormale de filmage sont indiques ci-dessous. I I Coloured pages / Pages de couleur I I Pages damaged / Pages endommagees I I Pages restored and/or laminated / ' — ' Pages restautees et/ou pelllculees rrV Pages discoloured, stained or foxed / '-^ Pages decolorees, tachet^s ou piquees I I Pages detached / Pages detachees r^ Showthrough / Transparence D D D D Quality of print varies / Qualite inegale de I'impression Includes supplementary material / Comprend du materiel supplementaire Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image / Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, etc., ont 6te filmees a nouveau de fagon a obtenir la meilleure image possible. Opposing pages with varying colouration or discolourations are filmed twice to ensure the best possible image / Les pages s'opposant ayant des colorations variables ou des decol- orations sont filmees deux fois afin d'obtenir la meilleur image possible. D Additronal comments / Commentaires suppl^mentaires: This itwn is f ilmad at tti« raduction ratio ctiaekad btlow/ Ca documant att film4 au taux ' a rMuction mdiqui ci-dattoin. 1CX 14X itx 22X 2«X »x 7 12X ttx 20X 24X 2tx i2t Th« copy filmed h«r« has b««n raproducad thanks to tha ganarosity of: BibliotMque gintrale. University Laval, Quibec, Quibac. Tha imagas appaaring hara ara tha bast quality possibia eonsldaring tha condition and iagibility of tha original copy and in kaaping with tha filming contract apacif icationa. Original eopias in printad papar eovars ara filmad beginning with tha from covar and anding on tha last paga with a printad or illustratad impraa- sion, or tha back covar whan appropriata. All othar original eopias ara filmad beginning on tha first paga with a printad or illustratad impraa- sion. and anding on tha laat paga with a printad or illuatratad impreasion. Tha laat recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol <^ (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol ▼ (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Mapa, plates, charts, etc.. may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand comer, left to right and top to bonom. as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: L'exempiaira film* fut reproduit grice k la gAnirosit* de: BibliotMque ginirale, Univeriiti Laval, Quibec, Quebec. Les images suivantas ont «t« raproduitss avac Is plus grand soin. compta tenu de la condition at de la nattet* de l'exempiaira film«, at tn conformity avac les conditions du contrat de filmaga. Les exemplaires originaux dont la couvarturo an papier eat lmprim«a sont filmte en commen^ant per le premier plat at %n tarminant soit par la derni«re paga qui comporta une emprainte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par la aacond ptat. salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires originaux sont filmte an commandant par la premiere pege qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration at an tarminant par la derni*re pege qui comporte une telle empreinte. Un des symboles suivants apparattra sur la darnlAre image de cheque microfiche, salon la cas: la symboia «» signifia "A SUIVRE". le symbols ▼ signifie "FIN". Les cartea. planches, tableaux, etc.. peuvent «tre film«s * des taux de rMuction diff«rents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour *tra reproduit en un seul cllch*. il est film* A partir de Tangle sup«rieur gauche, de gauche * droita, at de haut en bas. en prenant la nombra d'imagea n«cassaire. Les diagrammas suivants illustrant la m«thode. 1 2 3 4 5 6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No. 2) 1.0 I.I 1*5 tii ■ 2.8 ■ 4.0 Kibu 12.5 mim 2.0 1.8 1.6 ^ /APPLIED \M/\[3E Inc ^^. 165i East Main Street rjS Rochesl-;r, Ne« York M609 USA i^S (716) 482 - 0300 - Phone SB (716) 288 - S989 - Fax \ ^be Symbol of tbe Hpoetlee. /^ THE ^ /» SYMBOL OF THE APOSTLES / A VINDICATION OF THE APOSTOLIC AUTHORSHIP \> T ^^ ^"^ CREED ON THE LINES OF r-^ CATHOLIC TRADITION. 993 BY THE VERY REV. ALEXANDER MacDONALD, D.D., Vicar-General of the Diocese of Antigonish, Nova Scotia. NEW YORK Christian Press Association Pubwshino Company, 26 barclay street 1903 fmprimatut* * JOHN CAMERON. Bishop of Antigonish. nibil Obetat. Remioius Lafort, S.T.L., Censor. fmptlmatttr. * JOANNES M. FARLEY, D.D., Archbishop of New York. August S, 1903. COPTRiaRTED, 1908. TO THE EIGHT REVEREND a^ottjBetgnor <(Bui$tabe €ontatio» FORMER RECTOR OP THE URBAN COLLEaE OF PROPAGANDA FIDE, MY SUPERIOR FOR PIVE YEARS, MY TRUE FRIEND ALWAYS, THIS LITTLE WORK IS LOVINOLY DEDICATED. •AvT^v 6k T^v oftoXoyiav r^f niareuc eJf Uaripa Kai 'Tibv Kat iyiov UvEvfia U Koiuv ypa/ifidruv ixofiei>;—ST. BASIL, Lib. de Spirit. Sanct, c. 27, n. 67. ^ 'Ettov rv Gf^- . . . ro adv, ro ayapdf, rd ava «f rov Qebv niariv, rr/v f e Apostles' Creed and the Old Roman Symbol. II. Self-explaining Additions. TTT I^^ Communion of Saints. IV. The Wora " ruthoUc." V. The Name Cathc'.ic. VI. From an Histf.rical Point of View. The Additions to the Creed. VII A Question ment. VIII. The Church One and Visible. IX. A Specious Objection. X. A Divine Organism. XI. The Roman Symbol vised. XII. The Word "Father." XIII. The Forgetful CrlMo. of Vital Mo- Unro- CHAPTER XIV. The Name Catholic. I. A Rejected Hypothesis. yi t«„ „ ^ « T ._-.L „ ^^- Jew and Oentile, II. Another Hypothesis. m. Catholic and Christian IV. A Many-Nationed Church V. Patriotlam and Religion. J"- A Crisis In the Church. VIII. The Church Catholic. IX. True Comprehensiveness. 12 Meaning op " Symbol." I. From immemorial time the Apostles' Creed has gone by the name of the Symbol, or the Sym- bol of the Apostles. This word is from the Greek ^o,Mo. .tx,ken,» i„ niilitary language, watchword," m commercial parlance, « bar- gavi or "agreement." It is made up of ^a^;. and .-, ^i,e„ce .Va>fi„„ Arcam arose. But surely this is to fly i^ the for the first three hundred years of her ex -tence ,s little else than a record of t e pel secutzons, fierce and frequent, which The Ch„st«.ns bore with such heroic eonstaney ;r 1" r P«'^«™t«'l i« Palestine, and when they themselves were crushed aJd aU but extirpated by the conquering Bomans paganism persecuted to the full extent of iS ""^* '^ ^''<'«««' "o arena but had run red 22 The Disci- pline OF THE Secret. with the blood of martyrs. If persecution Zr^! l^'^-"'''r ''="«<' -hen Stephen won h.8 crown ,n Jerusalem, and Peter in ^rely d,d there east the Discipline of the Secret from the very infancy of the Church V. What then was this Discipline of the Secret, and when was it hrst set m operation, and whv^ The name Msoiplina Aroani is relativelv recent; the system described by th nlme ^ o^d as the Catholic Church. They r2l th! IZ ^.77'"' r '''''' '""'^'^^^^^^^^ th. V « r *'""'' "^ " fi^«an,ty, to withhold the mysteries of ffif rehgaon from the profane, and'commit them o^.ly to members of the household of the fail? tinctlydecUresthaturtblmtV-^ilt INTRODUCTION. know the mystep.es of the Kingdom of God " out!^lJ^' ! """'" """'^ *'"" »» '^th- ou all things are done in parables " (Mark 4 : il)- St. Paul lays special emphasis every, where on this principle of secrecy. He sefs .n the ministers of Christ "the dUpensers of the mysteries of God " (1 Cor. 4 : 1). He would have "the wisdom of God, a wisdom which IS hidden," spoken "in a my'steryT" and only " among the perfect " (lb. 2 .• 6, 7)--the competentes of a later day. He asks the Ephe^ sians to pray for him that he may « with con- !hl ■} t. ^'i ^^*' •'•" ^'^^^^''^^^ ^''Plains hat It ,s " to the saints " of God the mystery m question is to be unfolded (Col. 1 : 26) !r " :, ' '"*"■''■' "^ ''«^™»« t''^' Aey should hold "he mystery of faith in a p4 con- science." (1 Tim. 3:9). VI. As for the things which came under the rule of secrecy, we learn that they were chieflv tli» words which make u. .hat's now knZ as 24: SacramexVts, Sacrifice, AND Symbol. INTRODUCTION. the J form of the several Sacraments, the Euchanstic service, and the Symbol, not only as enshrining the principal mysteries of religion but especially as being the Watchword given to the soldier of Christ in his warfare with the pagan world. On this head Professor Zahn extracts valuable testimony from the DldaM or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles," a work composed some time between 80 and 130 A. D. "This book," are his words, "with deliberate intention, gives only fragmentary directions with reference to baptism, as with reference to the Lord's Supper. For example, the service of Holy Communion itself is not described at aU. Only forms of prayer are ^ven which are to be used before and during the celebration. Already at the time of St. Paul s first missionary journey, that the can- didate for baptism was accustomed to offer a confession of faith when he received baptism was borne witness to by St. Paul himself— superfluously, for it is self-evident. He re- minds Timothy of the beautiful confession he once made before the assembled community when he followed the caU to eternal hfe " 2& I INTRODUCTION. that the Chmhans .„ Asia Mino. were in the aabit of holding secret meetings before dav- I'ght and that they bonnd themselves by oath not to g.ve up a " deposit," which is identified, in a later chapter of the present work, with the Confess. ,f F-ith.- It appears also from th.s letter of Pliny's that the Christians were reg.arded as members of an extensive secret society, whereof the brotherhoods (hetaeriae) were proscribed by an imperial edict.= In the Acts of the martyrdom of Pope Alexander First, ws find decisive evidence of the existence of the discipline of secrecy in sub- apostobc times. Alexander suffered for the Faith in the last year of Trajan's reign. The precise date is May 3, A. D. 117. The Acta of his martyrdom, which the BoUandists speak of f ^fncerissima," plainly genuine and free trom interpolation, were drawn up before the ^^« Tertullian testifies to the stringency of this law of secrecy m the early Church. He takes It for granted that a Christian woman who *7 Ji .\'iff-SV. 'A. j<'. '.**<:- INTRODUCTION . should marry a pagan would be strictly bound to hide the mysteries from her husband, and uses this as an argument against mixed mar- riages. " Will not your husband know " he asks one whom he supposes to have wedded a pagan, « what you taste in secret, before every other food? And if he knows of the bread, will he not believe it to be what it is said to to be ? ' I. e., bread dipped in the blood of an mtant, as the common pagan calumny of the day represented the Eucharist to be. VII. ^^^cni^"^ I .' """^ ^^^« ^^"«"s reasons for ••••: *^"s law of secrecy. The Chris- tians were subject to persecution ±rom the first, as our Lord expressly fore- told they should be. Common prudence would therefore dictate that they should not parade their religion in the open view of those who were on the alert to seize and drag them before persecuting tribunals. Again, the mys- teries of faith were precisely those pearls that ' ^d U^orem, 1. 3 ; c. 5 (Migne, torn. 1, col. 1S96). 28 INTRODUCTION. the Master bade them not cast before swine. The Fathers give yet another reason. St. Basil draws attention to the fact thut over- much familiarity with sacred things is apt to breed contempt. He points to the mystery which surrounded the Holy of Holies in the Old Law as enhancing the revp'-nce and awe with which the Israelites regarded it. <'This is the reason," he says, « why certain teachings (which he has just spoken of as having been received in a secret manner from the tradition of the Apostles), have been handed on without writing."' The same principle is strongly insisted on by St. Clement of Alexandria, Ori- gen, and Eusebius. The first-named cites Plato as counselling his disciples not to commit the deep things of God to writing, and on the words of St. Paul (1 Cor. 2 : 6, 7 ; 3 : 1, 2, 3 ) observes: "By milk is meant the catechism, the first nutriment of the soul, as it were." ^ The allusion is plain to the ancient discipline which kept the Symbol from the catechumens, » De Spir. Sanct. c. 27 ; nn. 65, 66, 67 (Migue, P. G., 2 Strom. 1, 5 ; 0. 8 (Migne, i: . G., torn. 9). 29 If INTRODUCTION. ti in while yet they were gave it only when, after careful drilling Ind a lengthened probation, they were "able to bear " the " meat " or stronger food reserved for the soul in the mysteries of the Faith. Eusebius likewise cites the words of Plato, and adds: «To the same purpose also is that salu- tary precept which we have, ' Give not that which is holy to dogs ' (Matt. 7 : 6), and again, ' The, animal man perceiveth not the things of the Spirit of God'" (1 Cor. 2: 14).' "But after those whom we admonish have advanced m virtue," are the words of Origen, "... then at length they are initiated Tn the mysi teries. For, we speak wisdom among the per- fect " (1 Cor. 2 : 6.y He, too, cites Plato, and adds: "But I make bold to affirm, . . . that the disciples of Christ, after they were imbued with the grace of God, knew far better than Plato what things were to be written and how, and what was to be made known to the people' without writing; what things were to be Prcpar. Emng. 1, 13 ; o. 7 (Migne, P. G.. torn. 21). « Contra Celsum, 1, 8 ; c. 59 (Migne, P. G., torn. 11) 30 INTRODUCTION. I spoken, and what to be kept secret.'" And ^mee more, in his homily on Lev. 5, n. 3 (Migne! torn. 12), he observes: "I know that there are other thmgs that the children of Israel, that is, laics, can come in unto ; not, however, stran- gers, unless they are already admitted to the Church of God; ^For the Egyptian in the thud generation shall enter into the assembly of the Lord' (Deut. 23:8). I take it that the third generation is said in a mystic sense, be- cause of the faith in Father, Son, and Holy Wiost m whom every one who is joined to the Church of God believes." Here is a distinc- tion drawn between those that are without and those that are within, and again, in the number ot the latter, between laymen and clerics. Ihose that are without have no part in the mysteries ; " of those that are within, laics have access to some, not to all. What they have access to are the mysteries of the faith embodied in the Symbol, " the faitli in Father Son, and Holy Ghost, in whom all who arj members of the Church believe." Origen * lb. 1,6; c. 6. 31 INTRODUCTION. seems to discern in the Egyptian children of the third generation who were admitted into the synagogue, a mystic and subtle aUusion to the three classes of catechumens, mcijnentes, proficientes, competentes, of whom only the third were initiated into the mysteries and received in the Symbjl of the Faith, the Watchword of the Army of Christ. VIII. The Precept OF THE Master. Tertullian, in the passage from which the citation is given above, traces the law of secrecy to i . > precept of the Master (Matt. 7 : 6\ which l quotes as follows: "Cast not. He says, your pearls before swine, lest haply they trample them under their feet, and turn and rend you." Christians in the first, second, and third cen- turies, who had before their eyes the spectacle of a rampant paganism, savage and ferocious to the last degree, wallowing, also, in the mire of every abomination, were keenly alive to the wisdom of this divine precept, and in no wise slow to act upon it. On every side were these 39 'A I NTRODUCTION. swine: did not the words of the Master find liere then- most pointed application ? Clement and Ongen and Basil, too, as the reader will have observed, discern in the words of our Lord and m the Scriptures both of the Old Testament and the New the origin and sanc- tion of the discipline of secrecy, which they all ot them regard, not as a thing of recent growth, but as a something that existed in full vigor from the very beginning. It is impor- tant to note this, and to lay due stress upon it. 1 he root-reason for the Discipline of the Secret, the r^ison which our Lord Himself assigns, existed mall its force and peremptoriness, in the first century as in the fourth; nay, with tenfold greater force and peremptoriness in the first century than in the fourth ; therefore the Disciphne of the Secret existed in the first century, and was enforced with tenfold greater rigor, as the need was greater. To have decked v^hristianity in its pearls while yet it lay 1.1 Its cradle, in open view of the pao-an swine that ran about on all sides, rampant and furious-this surely had been a fatuous and suicidal policy. 33 '1: INTRODUCTION. i If some of the earlier writers, such as Ire- naeus, Theophilus of Antioch, Justin, Ignatius, and Minucius Felix, make no mention of the law of secrecy, or only hint at it, this may be either because we have not to-day all their writings, in some cases, but mere frag- ments, or rather, perhaps, because they are silent of set purpose. How could they more effectually hide the mysteries than to act as if they knew not of the concealment ? " Minu- cius Felix and Arnobius," writes Newman, " in controversy with Pagans, imply a denial that then the Christians used altars ; yet Tertullian speaks expressly of the Ara Del in the Church. What can we say, but that the Apologists deny altars in the sense in which they [Pagans] ridicule them ; or that they deny that altars such as the Pagan altars were tolerated by Christians? ... It would be wrongr indeed to deny, but it was a duty to withhold, the ceremonial of Christianity ; and Apologists might be sometimes tempted to deny absolutely what at furthest could only be denied under conditions."' Some of these writers, however, 1 Development of Christian Doctrine, pp. 27, 28. 34 drop an allusion here anA fi, i> - may inf.. that X Lie of'! ^ "''"'' tave been k„„„„ t, IJ^ » IT """'* speaks of "the dea^o^s rf I " ^^"''"^ Jesus Chriat"M7C/n ^t ":^'''"''' »* to be cited .ifn W t r"jt"^''"' """^^ Confession in"the Chri t o God "^""''"° ^'^ IX. Our greatest witness to the ■ » o ascipline of the Secret is St' I cl^v" Clement of Alexandria. Heflour- ^■■■^T!'^- ■sned in the latter nart nf tl.„ i and had « t™=. S " "'"'"'"' «enturjr, ana had tieasured up memoranda ao-ai„stoid X' hr/r''"^-'''"->f. gleaned frommen who had "preserved the true tradition of"he blessed doctrine directlv frnm V^t j , and John and Paul thf h„I f ,"'"' "'"'""' receivd it ,•„' -^ "^P"'*'*'' having fX" '' '"/•"=««^™" the son from thf Chri!t^ ' ' '"'''' "'" ^^ "f ^'ecy to now 1 hold ,t a matter of religion, as it is said not to oast pearls before sle/lest plrhan, they trample them under their ieet afd tut 35 INTRODUCTION. n and tear us." * He looks forward, however, to a time when it will be no longer needful thus to guard the mysteries, where he says : " Now it is forbidden to give that which is holy to dogs, so long, that is, as they remain savage." ' " These books [the Stromata]," he writes, ^ " will contain the truth mixed up with the doctrines of philosophy, or rather concealed and covered by them, as the eatable part of a nut by the shell ; for the seeds of the truth ought to be guarded solely for the husband- men of the faith." And, towards the close, he congratulates himself on having written his work " in such a way as to render the discovery of the hol}'^ traditions no easy task for any of the uninitiated." ^ That the Symbol came within the Discipline of the Secret in Clement's day is shown below. ^ After an ex- haustive study of the matter in Clement, the editor and compiler of The Faith of Catholics f 1 Strom. I. 1, n. 12 (Migne, P. G., torn. 8). a lb. 1. 2, c. 2. « lb. 1. 1. ♦lb. 1. 7, Migne, torn. 9). « See Chap. I. 36 His doctrine but to a few 2 Th.lT ^ an oral teditiou, descending from fa h J f -.amongst thetrue gncticfc be'evef 5 fniedTr'^'r*'^^''"^°^*''-<'-«ni "nd"„t;i?::::r''-'«'^vthe gnostic an^ th. f catechumen, nor unbeliever and therefore wrote obscurely on purpose." ■ ' ^ Strom. Vol. II n no ti • take not. out of pr ^t^' It has o'e?. '"'T^^'^ ''' '' ' •»'- should be remoted in ano^lr pd;. "' ^^''^-back, which in some inatances, of sperffic ' f "' ''"^ "^^' ^« *''« ^^^k. passages cited froTC'^C^^^^^^^^ to have taken it for eranted fh!f .u translator seems by him would be acclSe to 1 T'"^' '"'''''^ "««^ a general reference to he tt,. 't/r'^^^! «°^ «f^«". after page. ^^® '®''*' ^e^ers the reader to the ]p: 87 INTRODUCTION. X. i nave, m the third and fourth centuries, a cloud of witnesses. They represent it to us, not as a custom of re- cent origin, but as coming down from Apos- tolic times, and closely bound up with the very system of Christianity. And so, indeed, it was closely bound up with Christianity until, to adopt Clement's expressive phrase, the wild pagan dog had been tamed and thoroughly domesticated. This has been already pointed out, but will bear pointing out once more, and emphasizing. "Celsus frequently calls our doctrine hidden," says Origen, who reverts again and again to tliis subject, " though the gospel of the Christians is, almost throughout the whole world, better known than the opin- ions of the philosophers. . . . But that there should be, besides the exoteric doctrines, some things which are not manifested to the crowd, is not peculiar to the doctrine of Christians only, but is common to that of the philoso- phers as well, amongst whom some discourses 38 *teJ4 INTRODUCTIO N. were exoteric, and some also esoteric." ■ And St. H,ppoIyt„s, tl.e disciple of Iren^us, after citing the words of Paul to Timothy ab.ut ffaard,„. the deposit and commending it to faithful men who should be fit to teach others also(lT™. 6:20;2Tim. 2:2),«Ifthe„ he blessed Apostle delivered with c rcumspe " ment to all, seemg m spirit that all men have notfa,th(2Thess.3:2),howm„ch "eatl danger shall we run if, without canti^ Id ndiscnmmately we commit the oracles of God to profane and unworthy men." ■ So again, a ttle later ,n the same ceutnry, St. c/pria;: And we are also ordered to keep what i. holv w.hmo.. own knowledge, and not expose t to be trodden „u by swine and dogs," 3 ,„] s^aightway cites the oft-cited precept of the Master (Matt. 7 And, to quote one more !i„s m"'' ' """'"'""^ •" '"^ "-k agamst Manes, says: "These mysteries the ■ Contr. Cek. n. 7 (Mlg„e, P. a, t„„. „ , 'Denmm. de Ohristo et Antichr- in,ll,li * . B fift rtrf n . • ^i"ni^rtr. (tialland. torn 2 n 1\ iio. ad Demelnauum, n. I (Mirrn» p r . . '' 544). ti«"giie, i*. L., torn. 4, col. 39 INTRODUCTION. ! i! Church now unfolds to thee, who art passed from the class of catechumens ; to Gentiles it is not the custom ro manifest them. For to no one amongst the Gentiles do we make known the mysteries concerning Father, Son, and Holy Ghost ; neither do we speak openly before the catechumens concerning the mysteries, but we often say many things in au occult manner, in order that the faithful, who are acquainted with the matter, may understand, whilst those who are not thus acquainted may not be injured." ' St. Augustine also, in the fifth century, speaks of the Discipline of the Secret as a " custom." It appears to have been, in his day, of imme- morial standing; it was founded u""' Apos- tolic tradition; and it had, as have luaeed all old customs that are reasonable and right, from this very fact itself, the force of law. ^^ Disp. cum Manete (Galland, torn. 3, p. 610). I have not been able to trace this reference in Migne, and so give it and one or i wo others as found in Tlie Faith of Catholics. I must add that some authorities attribute these words to St. Cyril of Jerusalem. 40 I INTRODUCTION. XI. Further Testimony. It is not necessary to cite the testimony of fourth century writ- ers, so notorious is it that the law of secrecy was still in full force then. A few citations may be given, however, by way of specimen, or as having some direct bearing on the subject of this work. Speaking of St. Cyprian's writings, Lactantius says : « Beyond the mere word, he cannot please those who are ignorant of the mystery, inasmuch as the things he has written are mystical, and purposely de- signed to be understood by the ithful only." ' Athanasius cites the Lord's precept (Matt. 7), and adds : " For the mysteries ought not to be publicly exhibited to the uninitiated, lest the Gentiles, who understand them not, scoff, and the catechumens, becoming curious, be scan- dalized." =" At this time the heathen swine could but "scoff" and, perhaps, show their fangs; they could no longer "rend." The need for reserve was slowly passing away. 1 Divin. Instit. 1, 5 ; c. 1 (Migne, P. L., torn. 6). " Apol. contra Arian. n. 11 (Migne, P. G., torn. 25). 41 i^i INTRODUCTION. " You are summoned to the mysteries," says St. Ambrose, " though you know not what they are. You learn when you come." ' And St. Cyril of Jerusalem, addressing the grade of catechumens known as competentes : " But thou art now standing on the borders ; see thou tell nothing ; not that the things spoken of are not worthy of being told, but that the ear is not worthy to receive. Thou also wast once a catechumen [of the first grade, incipi- entes, or the second, proficientes] ; I did not tell what was before thee." ' XII. In THE Heart. In the writings of the New Testament. ^ Testament, or, to be more specific, • in the Pastoral Epistles, there are numberless references to what is variously and vaguely described as an " outline of teach- ing " (Rom. 6 : 17), " this teaching " (2 Jo. : 11), < confession" (Heb. 4: 12), "pattern of sound words " (2 Tim. 1 : 13), " deposit " (1 i Dc Elia et Jejun, c. 10, n. 36 (Migne, P. L., torn. 14). a Procatech. n. 13 (Migne, P. G., torn. 23). 42 Vd M i^.yfss.n^ipc.usK', "tluflw; INTRODUCT ION. Tim. 6 : 20).' We are not now concerned to ployed by the early Fathers; but Tertullia exXX num. but the. pubhc teaching of the Church." Thus Dom C^pnetm The DubUn Review for Oct. 1888. p. 2 9 The reference he g.ve. is De Pruesc. 25. TertulH J ij tlfere combutang the vie.^. of certain heretics of hfs day who maintazned (.o/e.^ dicere) that so.ne things theT^^we e knew *^/r;"''^ *''^'"r«'^- ^^^ -tJ^no.. or.ifZy Pm I; c oo -'"»— -t« to all their disciples (Je , , ' .^" ^^- ^**^ ^'■®^*^ Afri.ran sledge-hammer of eretjcs (for such he was and still is, though he^e"ms to now absuid it is to suppose that the Aoostleq to wi,«r„ was gi..n the Spirit of truth, could havtCtnorrnt o" anytr^t,, ,,,,,,^,^ ^.^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ cc. 23.I4) Nex c. 2.) he shows that the Apostles did not wi hhoid any me neietics. This is what he means, though he does not say It in so many words ; for tliose heretics alleged thaU was precisely their distinctive tenets which wefe so t'h "0. an^JS^\:^^rre"4t:r ^""T' ' ^^- out that the deposit " m question could not have con- these many svitnesses the Church is meant it .vl I Drought forth before many witnesses " (lb.). Teitullian does not deny the existence of the law of ^cre^y i^ ho 43 '"-> Htf**'., INTRODUCTION. ascertain what this teaching was. Enough for the present to know that it was some part of the Christian Revelation ; that it had been already formulated, that is to say, couched in a definite form of words, else it could not be spoken of as an " outline of teaching " and " pattern of sound words " ; and that it was to be " guarded " and committed only to " faith- ful men " who should be " fit to teach others also" (2 Tim. 2 : 2). Search the New Testa- ment from beginning to end, and you will not find this doctrinal formulary. You will find allusions to it in plenty, fragments of it, a few phrases or sentences picked from it, perhaps, Church, to which, as we have seen, he bears witness him- self. The very words he employs to denote the Creed, " sacramentum," "tessera," "symbolura," would prove this, even were there no other proof. What he says is that of the whole doctrine of Christ none was kept back from the beginning, but all was taught opeuly coram Ec- cleaia, that is, to the faithful. He does not say nor dream of 'saying that it was all taught openly before the catechu- men and the heathen. So, too, Origen says that the " Kerygma of the Church" was taught " manifestissime," (as Ruflnus renders it) " most plainly," rather tlian " most openly." But plainly or openly, it was " to the faithful " it was delivered, not to the cateohumen, and much less to the unbeliever. INTRODUCTION. but the formulary itself-nowhere. Can clearer e"de„ce be asked for of the existence, rom called the Disciphne of the Secret ? For here mheve-yheartoftheNewTestame:-: man to pluck from it. There is i„st one kev and one only, that can unlock this TystS' -Mian. Brsirorherr/.^^^^^^^^ iTw iV,?"""" ""^ "^"^ i'-lf historical ^em wishf,. to wrest the key from the hands of then: Mother, and fling it away. XIII. Vast is the ground that has to ; "Lead.Kcd. oe gone over by the one who ■■ "Lioht," would trace the Symbol to its '' source. The way is long and devious. It lies for the most part, in a wilderncs.,, and winds at taes through tangled forest shrouded in gl! ^ P.ek your steps never so carefully, yof, stU «e hable to stumble and to fall.'' E„Lw 46 ^ INTRODUCTION. upon this difficult way, where the light of nature so often fails one and the footing is so insecure, I look to Faith for guidance, and to Cathohc Tradition to lend me a helping and sustaining hand. And all my steps I give into the keeping of Mother Church, the guardian of the Symbol, the organ of Apostolic Tra- dition, the teacher of the true Faith, unre- servedly submitting to her unerring judgment and censure whatever is written in these pages. 46 CHAPTER I. The Tra- dition. APOSTOLIC AUTHORSHIP OP THE SYMBOL. I. Ancient tradition ascribes the authorship of the primitive Creed of the Church to the Apostles. Ever since the fifteenth century this tradition has been a target for criticism at the hands mainly of men not of the household of the faith. To^ay it is freely called in question even by Catholic scholars, among whom may be mentioned the Benedictine Baumer in Ger many, the Benedictine Dom Morin in France and the Barnabite Giovanni Semeria in Italy! The last-named, in a work fresh from the hands of the printer,' regards the received ^Dogrm Gerarchia e Cdto neUa Chiesa primitiva Roma : P. Pustet. 1903. l^rimiitva. 47 I I THE SYMBOL account of the origin of the Creed as legend- ary. He sets the old tradition aside, as not of a nature to win our belief on the score either of its antiquity or its universality, and follows Harnack in fixing upon the middle of the second century as the probable date on which our most ancient Symbol of Faith was formulated. I propose, first, to review briefly the explicit testimony that we have as to the Apostolic authorship of the Creed; next, to point out how the Discipline of the Secret was rigidly enforced and religiously observed in regard to it ; and, lastly, to consider the bearing of this fact on the question of its authorship. II. Witnesses TO THE Tradition. Between the latter half of the fourth century and the middle of the fifth, several writers of excep- tional standing, in respect of their learn- ing and their critical acumen, explicitly and categorically affirm the Creed to be of Apos- tolic origin. Chief among these are St. Am- brose, St. Jerome, the Presbyter Rufinus, 48 OF THE APOSTLES. 2^r '■ h? "** ^""'^- "^^ kst-named calls th Creed the "Catholic and Apostolic Sym- bol, speaks of .t as the Rule of Faith which has come down to us with the au- thority of apostolic institution," 3 and puts those who " contradict the Svmbol instituted by the ho y Apostles " in the same category with men who deny the doctrine of the Incarnation.* The testimony of St. Ambrose is contained in these words: "Let the Symbol of the Apostles be bel eved, wluch the Roman Church ever has m Its keepmg and preserves inviolate."' St Jerome bears witness that " the Symbol of our Faith and Hope, which has been handed down to us from the Apostles, is not written with "fth:':!?.'*"^"'™''""*''^"-^*^"^'^*' 2Serm.24,c.6(Migne,tom.54). ' Serm. 62, c. 2. * Serm. 06, c. 1. 'AdSiricium (Migne, torn. 23 : ep. 42 • co! Iior,^ (Migne. torn. 23. col. 380). ^*"'''*^'- °- ^• 4 49 THE SYMBOL m. Testimony op rufinus. i The testimony of Rufinus, who writes towards the close of the fourth century or the opening of the fifth, is, though no whit clearer or more categorical, fuller and much more specific. The others make but a passing allusion to the Symbol; Rufinus has a whole treatise upon iV At the outset of his commentary (for such it is) on the Creed, he deals with its origin. " The subject of his exposition," notes Zahn,^ " is the baptismal Creed of the Church of Aquileia, in which in 370 he received Baptism, and at the same time the Creed. But he does not discuss it without casting side- glances on the baptismal confessions of other Churches. He had not lacked opportunities for becoming acquainted with them," continues the author, attesting the competency of Rufinus. " He had passed six years in Alexandria and very nearly twenty in Jerusalem and the neigh- borhood. He had also made a long stay in Rome before settling in Aquileia for the rest ' Comment, in Symbol. Apost. (Migne, torn. 21.). • Tlie Articles of the Apostles' Creed, pp. 18, 19. 60 OF THE APOSTLES. of his life. He had also read some sermons on the Creed by famous preachers of foreign Churches." ^ Rufinus tells us how the faithful in his day held it as a tradition, handed down from their forefathers in the faith, that the Apostles, after the descent of the Holy Ghost upon them, and before they dispersed to preach the Gospel throughout the world, being gathered together composed the Symbol to serve as the norm of their teaching in the after time; how they collaborated in drawing up this brief outline {indicium) or index of the truths they were about to preach, and agreed to deliver it to be- lievers as their rule or standard; also, how they gave it the name of Symbol, a name, ob- serves our author, which signifies at once a putting together or " collaborating and a dis- tinctive mark or badge, whereby the preachers of the true faith, as well as true believers, may be known. He adds the significant words : " Therefore they delivered these [truths em- bodied in the Symbol], not to be written on paper or parchment, but to be retained in the hearts of beUevers, so that it might be certain 61 THE SYMBOL that nobody had learned them from writings which are known at times to fall into the hands of unbelievers, but from the tradition of the Apostles." According to Rufinus the Apostles not only composed the Creed but gave it the name of Symbol, which it still bears. Harnack has not been able to discover any trace of the term symbol as a designation of the Creed in the writings of the first two centuries. It would seem to have been for the first time employed in this sense by St. Cyprian.^ But this should not be held to weaken the force of the testimony of Rufinus to the fact, or rather the tradition, of the Apostolic authorship, which is, after all, the only matter of im- portance. The learned presbyter of Aquileia cannot be supposed to mean that the Apostles used the very word Symbolum itself (from the Greek \ but rather the equivalent for that word in their own language; the more so that, as he expressly tells us, they did not deliver the Creed in writing, but by word of mouth. In any case, it is far from clear that ' See, however, below. Chap, vi ; sect. 3. 53 OF THE APOSTL ES. he is citing the circumstance of the name as part of the old tradition. Nor is there any- thmg m the text or context of the passage to warrant Father Semeria in imputing to Rufinus the statement that the Creed was composed by the Apostles on the very day of Pentecost.' Un the contrary, his Discessuri igitur implies It to have been the mind of Rufinus that the Creed was not drawn up by the Apostles till the eve of their dispersion. In the beginning of his exposition of the bymbol, Rufinus notes the fact that the text is not exactly the same in all the Churches. Thus the Eastern Churches profess belief in "One God the Father Almighty." In the Creed of the Roman Church, as in that of Aquileia, the word « one " is wanting. Nor does the Old Roman Creed contain the addition, "maker of heaven and earth," found, with variations, in the Creeds of the Eastern Churches. Again, the words " He descended into hell," found in the Creed of Aquileia, are wanting m the Roman as well as in the Eastern Creed. Rufinus, however, observes that the » Op. cit, p. 321. 63 «li THE SYMBOL truth expressed in these words is impKed in the words " was buried," that precede ; for as the body went down into the grave so the soul went down into the place where the souls of the faituful departed awaited the coming of the Redeemer. Belief in **the communion of Saints " is not expressed in any of the earlier forms, even in that which St. Augustine ex- pounds in his homilies.'° But this, too, is implied in the preceding article, "the holy Chinch." Finally, the words, "life everlast- ing," with which the Creed now closes, though found in some at least of the Eastern formu- laries, are only imp! . .1 in the words, "resur- rection of the flesl'- which invariably form the conclusion of tne Western Creed up to and including the time of St. Augustine. The foregoing, with some other flight dif- ferences in the wording, constitute the vari- ations in the formula of the Apostolic Faith which served as the Baptismal Creed in the Church of the fourth and fifth centuries. Variations, as they are, apparent rather than w In traditione Symboli, Serm. 213, 213, 214 (Miene torn. 38). ' 54 OF THE APOSTLES. i^V^'/^u^^"' '""'•' 'he underlying Ideas they do but witness to the uaity of the pnuufve and archetypal fo™ of the Chr st^ Coufess.On of Faith. But where, if anywh ^ was th« archetypal form preserv d ? E^ 1 /! "'f " "'*'™-^ ^^'^^''^^^ " words wZ »ffi He agrees with St. Ambrose in affirming hat the Roman Church ever kept the Symbol of the Apostles inviolate. "S fact tha no heresy ever had its origi'ther " For add.t.o„s were made elsewhere, as he pro- ceeds to pomt out-not indeed frL with'; but from w,th,n, not by way of putting f„^ ward a new truth, but by way of bringin! i„t" clearer hght the old-to meet th! fisil heresies." "s>mg sel" V Jt:?;?.rira' ^'f ^ ^^^-^-^ in" the the Apostles pubH^eTtr: ""'^ °" ''^^ ^^^'^^^^ ^^ Creeds of the Crt h !l T I ^^"' ^'^""^ ^" ^^^^^^ Roman CreerZu^h he Z "'^^ ^'"'"^^^^^P^ '" the Old thesis. See the CW/ ^ T f** ''"'^ ^ ^ ^'''•^^'"^ hypo- PP. 216-231'''* "^"""'^'-'^^'^^"'fo-Octobe;, l4 m 55 THE SYMBOL IV. TioN ^nT\ -^^ ^^^^ ^^^^® °* *^® fourth cen- theLegenv. tury, therefore, and the beginning of the fifth, the Creed delivered to the class of catechumens known as com- petentes was the self-same, in substance and meaning, throughout the whole Christian world. And of this Creed Rufinus and Je- rome and Ambrose and Leo the Great declare the Apostles to have been the authors, or at any rate declare this to have been the received tradition in their day. Whatever is to be thought of this tradition, one thing is clear, and ought to be kept clearly in view bv anyone Avho really wishes to reach the truth in this matter : the tradition in question stands upon an altoj^ether different footing, and should be kept quite separate from the legend which, in the after time, grew out of it, or rather was woven around it, to the effect that each of the Apostles contributed a distinct article to the Creed, Peter contributing the first and Mathias the twelfth and last. This incongruous ap- pendage to the old tradition is first met with 5C it:} •■-' OF THE APOSTLES . in a sermon long believed to Hve been written by St. Aug istine, but now known to be the work of some anonymous scribe at a later date Its legendary character is sufficiently attested by Its spurious origin. It is true that St. Leo the Great, in his epistle to Pulcheria (ep. 31, 4), speaks of the Symbol as being duodeclm apostolorum totidem sUjnata sententiis, but this should not be taken to mean more than it says, to wit, that the Creed is stamped with the seal of Apostolic authorship by the fact of its containing as many articles as there were mem- bers of the Apostolic College from the begin- iimg. As a matter of fact, the words vitam aeternam which constitute the article ascribed to Mathias by the author of the sermon above referred to, were not part of the Creed known to St. Augustine, aor of the Old Roman or Apostles' Creed. The legend has been relegated, and with reason, to the Hmbo of vain things fondly invented. But what of the tradition ? Must It, too, go the same way? That it must appears to be the verdiot of what many look upon to-day as the court of last resort in all 57 *;&.; THE SYMBOL questions of this kind— the school of historical criticism. Before accepting the verdict as final, it will be well to inquire whether the method by which it has been reached is such as would be likely, in this instance, to lead those who employ it into the truth. We have to con- sider whether the Symbol of Faith known as the Apostles' Creed came withiii the Discipline of the Secret, and whether, if it did come within the Discipline of the Secret, this does not log'cally bar all movement looking to the discovery of its authorship along the path trodden by historical criticism. V. The Sym- bol AND THE Disci- pline OF THE Secret The reader will have gathered from what has been said in the In- troduction why the Discipline of the Secret was inaugurated in the nascent Church, and how strictly it was en- forced. It was only after persecution ceased and the old pagan Empire of the Romans was converted and baptized in the person of Con- stantine, that the DisclpJina Arcani was grad- ually relaxed. That it extended to the Sym- 68 OF THE APOSTLES. bol, and held it fast even in the days of St Augustine, is a fact that can be established on unimpeachable testimony. We have, first of all, the witness of Augustine himself. Over and over again he repeats in his homilies that the Symbol is not given in writing. " No- body," he says, « writes the Symbol that it may be read. " When delivering it to the cate- chumens a week or two before their baptism, he warns them : "In no wise are you to write down the words of the Symbol in order to com- m,t them to memory. You are to learn them by ear (audiendo) ; and even after you have learned them, you are not to write them, but to retain them in memory and rehearse them." He goes on to say that everything which they "/)« 5ym6. ad Catech. (Migne. torn. 40. col (i'^r ) M,gnedec.de8 in favor of the genuineness of tl^homiy on .ntnns.c grounds. But in l»omiIies on the Creed Xh are unquest.onablj St. Augustine's, the " resurrection o hind H "."•' ''''' ''^'''''' ^" *'"•« o"«.- the otJr hand, the words •' in vitam aeternam " are cit.d as part of his DeFtde et Symholo, nor in his EncMndion de fide etc does St. Augustine cite as part of the Symbol the wonis in queation. See on this subject. Chap. IV.. Sects. 8 and 8 69 it THE SYMBOL are about to hear m the Symbol is contained in Scnpture, but that, as gathered together and reduced to a certain formula, it is not Uwful to write It («o« licet soribi). This he con- ceives to have been foreshadowed in those words of the Old Testament: "This is the covenant that I shall make with them after those days, said the Lord; I will give my law in their bowels, and in their hearts will I write ■t. ' In token of this," he adds, "the Sym- bol IS learned by ear ; nor is it written on tab- lets, or any kind of material, but in the heart. •' In another homily," when he comes to the pomt where the delivery (traditio) of the Symbol took place, he says: "These are the words that you are faithfully to learn by heart and recite from memory," that is, on the day set for their baptism. The Saint adds, within brackets, the following words, which he set down when he first put the sermon in writ- ing: (After this preface tlie whole Symbol is to be given out, no word of comment being interspersed therewith : / belieoe in God the »Serm. 213 (Migne, torn, 38 ; col. lOtO). » Serm.au (lb., col. 1060). 60 OF THE APOSTLES. put the Symbol ,„ writing, which being s^id, the foUcvmg discourse is to be added)." St Augustine thus scrupled to write the words of the Creed even ,n the manuscript of his own sermons. AH this taUies with 'the testLoi; of fLI °r ^^Tf^ 1"°'""^' "•""''« Symbol of Fa, h, "handed down from the Apostles is not wr. ten „,h ,,^ „„ ^^_^ J J^,^ truths contamed m the Creed formukted by thos whom Chr«t first sent to teach and bap^ to aU nations were not delivered to men to be wntten on paper or parchment, but to be might be known for certain that " no one had rr:^ r/""^ ^^'' "'■''='' »' «— fall nto the hands of unbelievers, but from tlie tradition of the Apostles." Other witnesses, in the West, to the law of ^crecy which guarded the Symbol, are St. l-eter Chrysologus and the author of the £x. planaHo SymboH. The former in ahnost aU 61 THE SYMBOL III his sermons on the Symbol, cautions his hearers not to put the Creed in writing, lest it should fall into the hands of the unbehever. Enough to cite from one. "The Faith," he says, " which we believe and teach, not with the pen' but with the living voice, let us consign to the' secret closet of the heart, not to paper. Let it be committed to memory, not to writing, lest the divine gift be profaned by contact with earthly things ; lest the uninitiated beholder seize upon the heavenly secret, and what is life to the be- liever prove to the unbeliever a source of spirit- ual ruin." -5 The author of the Explanatlo, reputed to be St. Ambrose, tells us that tradition forbade the writing of the Symbol, and main- tains that the living memory will conserve it better than the written page. The passage runs : "I wish you to bear in mind, since you have to recite the Symbol, that you must not write it. Let no one write it. Why ? Because such is the tradition. What, then, is to be done? It is to be held fast. But how can it be held fast, you will say to me, if it is not written. Rather can it be held fast if it be not written. How » Serm. 60. (Migne, torn. 52). 62 OF THE APOSTLES. *f .. do you mean ? Let me explain. What you write you do not set to work to bring home to yourself by thinking over it daUy; you feel so sure about it because you can read it over any time But what you don't write, you are afraid It will slip away from you, and you therefore set to work at once to rehearse it day by day " '* To know the Symbol by heart was to the early Christians a matter of life and death. In a etter « to the aged Alypius » '^ St. Augustine relates how a pagan of the name of Dioscorus had a dearly loved daughter whose life was despaired of, and how, upon his taking a vow to become a Christian, she was restored to health, bailing to keep his vow, he was struck blind. All at once he bethought him f hat his blindness was a judgment of God upo, him for havino- broken Ins vow. A second time he vows he wil perform his first vow if he recovers his sight. This he does, and is duly baptized, but he has not got the Symbol by heart, alleging as excuse that he is not able. He is now struck With paralysis, which extends to his tongue. "Migne, torn. 17; col. tl60. " Migne, torn. 33, col. 1012. 63 fi THE SYMBOL Admonished in a dream that this has happened to him because of his not having recited the Symbol from memory, he makes a confession to this effect in writing, learns the Symbol by heart, and is freed at length from all his in- firmities. Modern incredulity may smile at the childlike simplicity of him who tells the story. But the great bishop of Hippo, were he still with us, could say, as Newman said under like circumstances : Hippoclides doesn't care. VI. Testimont OF Eastern Fathers. We will now turn to the Eastern Church. Our first witness shall be St. Cyril of Jerusalem, who became Bishop of that ancient See about the middle of the fourth century. His testimony is so explicit, and so much to the purpose, that it must be given at length in his own words. He is addressing the class of cotnpetentea on the eve of their baptism : " But take thou and hold, as a learner, and in profession, that faith only which is now de- livered to thee by the Church, and is fenced 64 OF THE APOSTLES. not read the Scriptures, but some as beiuff un- learned others by business, are hindered from knowledge (of them), in order that the soul may not perish from want of instruction, we comprehend the whole doctrine of the faith in a few sentences. This I wish you to remember in the very phrase, and to rehearse it with all diligence amongst yourselves, not writing it on paper, but graving it by memory on your lesthlnr^''^^'^?"' ^"^'^ ^^ your exercise, lest haply a catechumen should overhear the things dehvered to you. This I wish you to have as a provision by the way during tlie whole period of life, and besides this nefer to receive any other."~(7«^ecA., 5 ; n. 12.'« "And I could wish to say this openly," are the words of St. Chrysostom in his fortieth homily on the First Epistle to the Corinthians '' but I dare not on account of those who are not initiated. They render the exposi- tion of the subject more difficult to us, in- asmuch as we are constrained either not to speak plainly, or to make known the mys- " Migne, P. O., torn. 83. "Migne, P.O., torn. 61. 5 65 THE SYMBOL teries to them. But I will speak, as £ar as may be, covertly and in a veiled manner. For after the recital of those mystical and dread words, and the awfid canons of doctrine that have come down from heaven, we add this also at the end, when we are to be baptized and are bidden to say, / believe in the resur- rection of the dead" St. Basil the Great witnesses for the Church in Gappadocia. " Of the dogmas and teach- ings preserved in the Church," he writes, " we have some from the doctrine committed to writing, and some we have received, transmit- ted to us in a secret manner, from the tradition of the Apostles; both these have the same force in forming religion ; and no one will gainsay either of these, no one, that is, who has the least experience of the laAvs of the Church."^" Again ; Dogma is one thing, and preaching anot. i-; for the former is guarded in silence, while preachings are openly proclaimed." That ho means by "dogma" especially the Symbol appears from the words he uses a little further on : " The very Con- » De Spirit. Sancto, c. 27 ; n. 60 (Migne, P. G., torn. 83). 66 OF THE APOSTLES. fession of Faith in t?„*l « naif of the second ceriturv W.o i? Blessed doctrine, directly from P.t„ J James, and John, and Paul the Hoi T' T'^ having received it .„ ^ Apostles, the fafher - He oallsTT' tl"" '"" vener«M« rule of tr,1v "^'^^'atedand 'he origin's the tl^e^' Tr" ^ '™'" p...^a.otheprof^cShSt:c::t:: 67 si i H nl M < THE SYMBOL i il [ i of heaven and earth " contained in the first article of the Creed. He speaks of it as knowledge " which has come down, transmitted without writing to a few by successions from the Apostles," and distinguishes between it and the apostolic doctrine contained in Scrip- ture, saying : " For as the doctrine, so also was the tradition of all the Apostles, one." Now, this "blessed tradition," which was handed down orally from the Apostles, and which, being a tradition of " doctrine," must at the least have included the Symbol, whatever else it may have included, he affirms to have been guarded as a secret. He conceives it to be "the delineation of a soul that loves, to guard the blessed tradition so that it may not escape." He says that, "Secret things, like God, are entrusted, not to writing but to oral teaching," with much more to the same purpose. Let me make an end of citation with a pass- age from the Stromata : " Some of these secret things I deliberately pass by, making a selection after reflection, 68 III t li OF THE APOSTLEfl . being afraid to commit to writing thino.« wl,' u ^«m fear U^ S '1'^;^* w-tth'"' taking them in a wrong senLmio-lT/f n-"' error, and we should tlfus belfoS t„^ '"'" :ng a, they say .h use pr«.K:wtft; to declare! and thoS hilt tr""'-?"^' ^^^ though silent to pfint o„t^ I'^Ht -fi r"* before the readers the do^L rt.,f ^ ''I '"y taught by celebrated heS an/, -m"" ""'" to them all that ought tob?'r • i' "'^^'^ interior contemplXn „f t P'^?*'' *° ""« will be procSd^n bv ''"'"''^^.ffe, which celebrate? a7d vfne abk'™)! .Tt'l V^ *" ""^ .e^.ng.omtbeorigit^ VII. There has been produced evi- i Conclusion. denee enough and to spare that about and jealoudy guarded by the Disci- 69 Li THE SYMBOL n :n: ■ I ! * t ht ^line of the Secret, that the early Christian writers religiously refrained from reproduc- ing it in their works, and even from put- ting it at all in writing. But consider how fraught with significance is this, and how effec- tually it serves to discredit the method of his- torical criticism, so-calied, as applied to the question of the authorship of the Creed. Your ingenious critic, with his vast apparatus of learning, with an industry and patience in re- search beyond all praise and worthy of all emu- lation, ransacks the writings of sub-apostolic and early times for the Symbol, and declares he cannot find it. No marvel that he cannot find it ; he seeks the living among the dead. The Creed is in the heart and on the lips of the Church of the living God ; he is looking for some fossil remains of a casket that might be thought to have enclosed it, but didn't; for, to cite once more the words of St. Jerome : " The Symbol of our Faith and Hope, handed down to us from the Apostles, is not written with ink on paper, but graved on the fleshly tablets of the heart." To the weary and sore-per- plexed critic, peering into ancient tomes, grop- 70 •:-V OF THE A roSTLES. inff in t.,e twilight of those early times, seekini, in vain the source whence came the Symbol the words of Augustine and Jerome and Rufi- nus, of Basd and Cyril and Clement, should l»ave been a-; the legend on the sign-post to ^7 ^»^«ely warning of No Thoroughfare. liut he heeded not the warning; he had no ejes or .f he would plod his way, groping ever, tilJ at length he has fetched .p .•„ a blind aUey. For this is just where it. fo^Iare to find other than an anonymous a^?^o: r.>r ; - ^reat Creed of Christendom has " cism— in a cul-de-sac. To the searcher for the f :\ uii; ^ Hterary remains of the early a^ almost say as the Angel, said \o 't inM.,'v enti- ty' '■-^- the -iiose who sought m the sepulchre the Lord of the Sym- bol -- surrexit non est hie, « He is risen- He IS not here." For those in whose minds and hearts the Symbol came from the Anos- ties down to later generations have mounted to that "house of many mansions" where Faith IS merged in Vision. "When we reach that place where we shall reign," says St Augustme,in his fifty-eighth homily, "there 71 . ii .• i i I IBfi SYMBOL 1 f will be no more need of our saying the Sym- bol ; we shall see God ; God Himself ^ill be our Vision, and the vision of God will be the reward of this oui* Faith." 72 i.i>^;T * OF THE APOSTLES. CHAPTER II. THE QUEST OF THE SYMBOL. I. True Start- ing- point. "What the living Church of God handed down from genera- tion to generation of behevers as the Symbol of the Apostles was, with slight variations affecting neither its substance nor its essential meaning, the Baptismal Creed of Christendom in the fourth and fifth centuries. St. Leo the Great, who became Pope in 440 A.D., writing to the monks of Palestine, refers to it as "the Symbol of salvation which you recited before many witnesses when you re- ceived baptism.'' And again, in a letter against Eutyches, addressed to Flavian, Pa- triarch of Constantinople, he says, speaking of that arch-heretic : " What instruction has he 1 Ep. 134 ; c. 8 (Migne, torn. 54, col. 1068). 78 w*^f^ THE SYMBOL got from the sacred pages of the New Tes- tament or the Old, when he does not understand even ,the elements of the Symbol ? Of the Symbol which is on the lips of all candidates for baptism throughout the whole world, that old man iias not yet grasped the meaning.'* ^ This period, then, in which it is matter of his- torical record that the Symbol was the Bap- tismal Creed of the Universal Church, is the true starting-point in the quest of its origin. IT. The Symbol : Before settinff out on our One • • quest, we shall do well^ to con- sider what our real objective is, and by what way we are to reach it. At the period we have taken for our starting-point, the Church of Rome has its Symbol, and the Church of Aquileia has its Symbol, and the ClPTch of Antioch has its Symbol, and the Church of Alexandria has its Symbol. In short, the prin- cipal Churches throughout the world have each its own Symbol. Are we to seek a diverse » Ad Flav. ; c. 1 (Migne, torn. 54, col. 757). 74 OF THE APOSTLES. Origin for each of these Symbols, or for all a common ong^^n ? We must find one origin for aU. And why? Beeanse, after all, i.! spite of variations m the form and wording, the Symbol IS one-one in its scope, one in its meaning, one in its structure, one in type, one 11 all Its essential elements. So little does St Leo regard these variations in the form of the Symbol as affecting its unity that he affirms it to be, not only one in all the Churches, but .".changeable as well.' From the begin- n.ng there IS "one Lord, one Faith, one Bap- tism o„e God and Father of all." The Faith of the One Fold is one from the first, there- lore IS the Symbol or Confession of the Faith one The one Church can have but one Creed -this needs not even to be pointed out to tho«, that are ot the household of the faith. As for those that are without, they have only to glance into the writing, of the early Fathers I-o".t. St Leo does but echo the words of Christian A„ti,,„ity, as we shall have occasion '*i '^''ii>i'-aau.;o.3(m„g^,u,n, 75 54, col. 986J, THE SYMBOL to point out presently, when he speaks of the one and unchangeable Confession of Faith. The conclusion thus reached on logical, theological, and historical grounds regarding the unity of the Symbol, is borne out also by analogical considerations. In living organisms unity of structure implies unity of type, and unity of t^ pe involves unity of origin. Organ- isms sprung from the same source will vary ; variation, indeed, is the very condition of their growth ; but the unity of structure and type that is discernible in them will ever attest their common origin. So it is with the formularies of the Faith in tlie fourth and fifth centuries. Despite the variations that are visible on the surface, it is but an unpractised eye that will not detect the underlying sameness of type and lineament which bespeaks their common authorship. Even those who deny the Apos- tolic origin of the Symbol realize that there is an archetype to which all variant forms must be traced, though they are at a loss to know what that is, or where they are to look for it. Dr. Kattenbusch identifies it with the Old Roman Creed j Dr. Loofs follows the lead of 76 OF THE APOSTLES . Caspari in tracing it to the Johannine circle in As.a M.nor/ Strange that none of these ent.cs has been led to trace the archetypal %mbol o the Mother Church of Jern Jem The cradle of Christianity would We been a not unlikely place to look for the aborieinal Creed of Christianity. And it might not have proved, .t should seem, a bad " working hypo- thesis, that the men whom Christ Himself commissioned in Jerusalem to " teacn all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost " had, m virtue of that commission and in ac- cordance with it drawn up the Formula of Faith winch should serve all nations for their Baptismal Creed. But the method of histo- rical criticism barred this hypothesis. Besides, It .s not pleasant for people to be made to fee as the swart Moor of Venice felt when he ex- claimed : Othello's occuration's gone. * 37*. Church quarterly Review, Oct. 1903. pp. 218-23 77 ;8 THE SYMBOL m. Method of Historical Criticism, For the one Symbol, there- fore, which, as Cassian, the dis- ciple and deacon of St. Chry- sostom, puts it, " expresses the Faith of all the Churches," ^ we shall seek one origin. The variations in its form are easily accounted for by the necessity that arose in particular Churches for a more explicit statement of the doctrines it contained. And by what way shall we pro- ceed in our quest ? Not by the way of his- torical criticism, for that way is blocked. li leads those who follow it, as has been already pointed out, into a cul-de-sac. The historical critic searches for the Symbol, or traces of the Symbol, among the remains of early Christ- ian literature, after much the same manner as the biologist seeks for a species, or traces of a species, among the fossil remains of early geo- logical epochs.* This is all well enough. But in the eagerness of his search, he overlooks a point of capital importance. Between literary re- • De Tncar. Christi, 1. 6 ; c. 3 (Migne, torn. 50, col. 145). « Dogma, Oierarchia e Culto, p. 822. 78 OF THE APOSTLES. mains and the fossa remains of plant or animal there « a radical distinction. The lat^"^ deliver their message to those who fi„d them Now, here .s where the method of historicl criti « «n «, a fault. It takes the Symbol, bv di^ If P^eomg together the scatte«,d elements of it from the wntmgs of Cyril and Ruiinus and Augnstme, and pays no, the slightest hL"o the warnmg which these ,«me ^tiZtLZ Tthe r^r .^ ^^ ^"- ^ters tr are the first to describe »« expouml the Symbol t..at they did noftrei^t-rrr:,' S/otrr-^a^:^ '-'-"- that ,s wUlmg to trust the« ^^^ „,,,„ ^^^ tell us what the articles of ti« %,„ho, „,^ "j^ the,r day. and in what ,^ 4„, „,,7 '" »nged, but will not trust .W,^ 2:^- »» how the Symbol was tr^^.^, „, '^ by their forefathers i„ the faith ■ ft, .^ of the critic to fancy that he can run wiU. e 79 i:| THE SYMBOL I hare and hunt with the hounds after this fash- ion. "I wiU accept nothing," he declares, " but what I can find documentary evidence for." AH very well. But let the whole evi- dence be taken. It wiU not do to take this because it fits in with a preconceived theory, and reject that because it doesn't. The method that picks and chooses in this way is neither critical nor historical. " The very Con- fession of Faith in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost," says St. Basil, "from what written records have we it ? " The critic may, if he likes, put this statement of St. Basil's to the test, and proceed to ransack written records for the Confession of Faith. He has a perfect right to do this. But he has no warrant, and no shadow of warrant, on failing to find it, as he was foredoomed to fail, to say that the Symbol did not then exist nt all. This is an assumption so arbitrary that it is difficult to speak of it with composure. His assumed first principle will not let the critic see that he has been looking in the wrong place for the Symbol. In our quest for the origin of the Creed, 80 la OF THE APOSTLES. then, we shall set out, not with an assumed first principle, but with a fact proved by docu- ments, and proved up to the hilt, namely, that the Creed was not transmitted in writing to the Christians of the fourth and fifth centuries, but handed on by word of mouth, and "graved on the fleshly tablets of the heart." The knowledge of this fact will be as a lamp unto our feet. In the light of it we shall not look for the Symbol itself in the writings of the earUer time, assured beforehand that it is not to be found there. We shall look only for traces of it, tokens of its existence in the minds and hearts of believers, in the mouths and on the hps of the neophyte and the martyr, and these we shall find in plenty. Of course, no comprehensive or minute search into original sources can be made here, nor shall it be attempted, nor is it, inrV^fj' needful. We shall pick up in pas.si3i<:r „r-c or two allusions to the Symbol from third Lntirv writings, and proceed straightway to tC second century, which is to-day the bar.V ground of the rival theories as to its origin. 16 81 11' h. il THE SYMBOL IV. The Creed IN THE Third Century. Eutychianus, who became Pope , *" 275, A.D., says in the course of a pastoral charge to the Ro- man clergy: "See that you teach your flocks the Symbol and the Lord's Prayer."' In hjs letter to Magnus, written before the middle of the third century, St. Cyprian de- clares that, while those who are cut off from the communion of the Catholic Church "are baptized .n the same Symbol as we are," yet they "have not the same law (interpretation) of the Symbol as we have, nor the same inter- rogatory. • I„ the time of St. Cyprian, there- fore, the Baphsmal Creed was known as the Symbol.. And the Saint draws a clear dis- tmetion between this Creed and the trina in- i7'-^Tnu *?'" '•"^"ogato.y which is in «^e m the Church to this day. It is important to note this. The Symbol goes before the in- Ep. ad Magnum, c. 7 (Migne, ton. 8, col. 1143) &,,„.,» Mj.,, i„ the work already cited , " S. Cypriano iuu.a.t'r^'rhe"^;:;::^'^"-'"^'™--'— '"^lo"!" %w ^% OF THE APOSTLES . terrogatory in Cyprian, and this is the logical order. For the triple query of the minister of baptism supposes a knowledge of the Symbol in the candidate for baptism, else he could not make an inteUigent reply. From this we may conclude that the Symbol is not derived from the interrogatory, but conversely, the interroffa- tory from the Symbol. Finally, there are dis- tinct traces of the Symbol, nearly all the ele- ments of it, indeed, to be found in a treatise on the Trinity written by Novatian, the schismati- cal anti-Pope and founder, conjointly with No- vatus, of the Novatian heresy, about 260, A.D. The opening words are : « The Rule of Truth requires that we should first of all believe in God the Father and Lord Almighty." '» The Creed IN Tertullian. V. Tertullian is a witness to the faith and traditions of the second century, his most notable works having been written in its closing years, or in the opening years of the century that ^De Trinit. c, 1 (Migne, ib., col. 885). 83 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No. 2) 1.0 1.25 ^^ III 2-8 l£ mms Ib ■ 3.2 Li y^ lis us 1^ 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 ^ /APPLIED IM/IGE Inc 3Sr. 1653 East Mo.n Street S"^ Roche-ler, Ne« York !4609 USA '.as (716) 482 - 0300 - Phone aia (716) 288 - 59B9 - r^x THE SYMBOL followed. There are in his writings refer- ences almost without number to the Creed of the Church in his day. He does not call it by the name of Symbol, though he does use hi describing it the word " tessera," which is also from the Greek and has the same meaning. To TertuUian the Creed is "the doctrine," " the tradition," and more especi- ally the " Law " or " Rule of Faith." In three several works " he gives us a more or less ex- plicit statement of its articles, with a certain slight variation in each case. These are ex- hibited below in a tabular form for purposes of comparison with one another and with the Old Roman Creed. Creed Forms in Tertullian. Old Roman De Praescript. Creed. c. 18. (1) I believe (1) I believe In Ood tlio in one God, Father Alrrighty maker of the world, Adv. Prax. c. 2. De Virg. Vel. c. 1. (1) We believe one only God, (1) Belle vinK In tho one only Ood Almighty, maker of the world, m and in Christ Jpsua His only Son, our Lord, (3) the Word called His Son, Jesus Christ, (2) and th« (2) and HIa Son and M ord Son. Jesus of one only God, Christ, called Jesus Christ, " Dc Praescript., Contra Praxeam, De Virginibua Ve- landin ; Migne, toin. 2, cols. 20, 156, 889- 84 OF THE APOSTLES. De Praescript. c. 13. Old Roman Creed the V.rgm Mary, power of God the Father made flesh lu JlHry's •w-omb, and bora or her, Adv. Prax. c. 2. De Virg. Vel. c. 1. (*) Crucified under Pontius Pilate and buried, <4) fastened to a Cross, , (i)^ Him suf- fered, dead, and buried. (i) crticifled under Pontius Pilate, from the dead ^ ' }"^'^^ to life by the Father, (6) Ascended into heaven, , (7) Sitteth at the right hand of the Father, (8) whence He shall onnie to Judge quick and dead. (7) sat at the (7) ,,>, „^ (8) will come in glory to take the good into life eter- nal, and con- demn the wicked to perpetual fire, <8» will come to judge living and dead, (5) on the third day brought to life from the dead, (6 1 received in heaven, ^7) sits now at riarlit hand of Father, <8» willcometo judge living and dead, (9) And in the Holy Ohost, _ (10) the holy Church, ' 01) remission of sins. Spirit, ' Paraclete, (10) to govern believers, (12) through resurrection of the (lush. We h.ave here in the writing, of Tertullian, all the articles of the Old Roman Creed excel, 85 ' THE SYMBOL the tenth (which is implied in one instance) and the eleventh. Are we to infer, because these two articles are wanting, that they were not to be found in the Creed that was in use in his day ? By no means. TertuUian does not pretend to cite that formulary word for word. The words given above in parallel columns are picked from their context, where they are found, in some instances, mingled with extra- neous matter. Besides, the phrases in the sev- eral columns do not tally exactly with one another, nor with the words of the Old Roman Creed. Nor is the same number of articles given in each case, nor are the same ones. Thus, tlie twelfth article is wanting in Ad- versus Fraxeam, and the ninth in De Virgin- ibus Velandls, wherein the form approaches most closely to that of the Old Roman Creed. But who can doubt that the Rule of Faith which TertuUian so often refers to, and which he declares to be "absolutely one, sole, un- changeable, and irreformable," " had its set- ting of words fixed uniform, the same for all ? « De Virg. Vel, loc. cit. 86 OF THE APOSTLES . We may surmise that Tertullian's obiect in varymg, aa he does, the words in wh h he ™nveys the doctrines of the Creed was to v^ W the uu..„t,ated the Sacred Symbol of te Faith, ,„ accordance with the prevailin. Disci- pline of the Secret. The economy of his ,n. |..age reca ,s that passage in the StromcJZ bt. Clement of Alexandria, where he says that there are some things which his writing' «wa ySoTi' "' "i",''"<'"'P^ "'"ie co,fceaHng fnd tL t''/"'' """'°''* '''<""? "> »-»fest! and though sdent to point out." One is at 1 loss otherwise to account for the c i „s ir cumstance that, in ,he three several Ice; ^viere Tertullian professes to be settin/f„rt the content of the Rule „f Faith, on^e a d onc^ony does he use exactly the 'same fom wm Iw." " ^'""^ "' "'« '^'^'^ g-en above But be this as it may, certain it is that we cannot nghtly infer a given article to hav^ Lin wanfug „. the Creed of Tertullian from he mere crcumstance of his nut making expli it menfon of ,t. I„ the very passage in ,' he professes to be giving the "one! unchanit 87 ^ 'i i^ THE SYxMBOL 1 cij "If 1^8 ' il able, irreformable " Rule of Faith, he omits the ninth article, which he nevertheless gi » in the other two places. What is more, we gatner from a passage in his Liber de Baptis7no (c. 6) that the ten... article, embodying belief in " the holy Church," was part of the Creed in his day. " Since, howevv-r," he there says, " the profes- sion of faith is made and the pledge of salva- tion given in the name of the three, mention of the Church is necessarily added. For where the three are, that is, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, there is the Church, which is their body."'^ The Baptismal Creed, therefore, included the tenth article in TertuUian's time. And if one were to infer from his not mention- ino- it in any of the three passages referred to above, that it was not included, the inference would be false and contrary to fact. Is there not the very strongest kind of presumption that a similar inference drawn from the same prem- ises with regard to the eleventh article would similarly be unwarranted ? Besides, the doc- trine of the remission of sins is expressly w Migne, torn. 1, col. 1206. 88 OF THE APOSTLES. affirmed in the treatise on Baptism (chaps. 6 and 10). t ■ VI. The Creed IN Irenaeus. Irenaeus, the disciple of that Polycarp "who had not only been trained by the Apostles, and had conversed with many of those who had seen Christ, but also had been constituted by the Apostles Bishop over Asia, in the Church of Smyrna " '^ ig ^^j. ^^^^^ authoritative witness to the existence from the beginning and the Apostolic authorship of the Creed. He speaks of it in one place as "this outline " 's ({„ the Greek, x^P'^^^^ipa) which corresponds to "sym- bol," the "tessera" of Tertullian, and the Latin "indicium" of Rufinus), but usually as the Tradition, and specifically as the Rule of Truth. With him, too, as with Tertullian, this " Rule of Truth which he received by his " Ado. Haer, Bk. 3, c. 3, § 4. I cite the English transla- tion by Keble. Of the Greek original of this great work of Irenaeus only some fragments have come down to us. The Latin version, very ancient, is the basis of all modern versions. « Bk. 2, c. 28, g 1. 89 THE SYMBOL baptism," '^ is one and the same in all the world. After setting forth the principal arti- cles of it, as exhibited in the first column of the syllabus given below, he goes on to say : " This preaching and this faith, the Church, as we said before, dispersed as she is in the whole world, keeps diligently, as though she dwelt but in one house ; and her belief herein is just as if she had only one soul, and the same heart, and she proclaims and teaches and deuvers these things harmoniously, as possess- ing one mouth. Thus while the languages of the world differ, the tenor of the tradition is one and the same. And neither have the Churches situated in the regions of Germany beheved otherwise, nor do they hold any other tradition, neither in the parts of Spain, nor among the Celts, nor in the East, nor in Egypt, nor in Libya, nor those which are situate in the middle parts of the world. . . . Nor will he who is weak in discourse abate aught of the Tradition. Yea, the Faith being one and the same, neither he that is able to speak much of it hath anything over, nor hath he that speaks but little any lack." '^ » Bk. 1, c. 9, § 4. » lb., c. 10, § 2. 90 OP THE APOSTLES. It As in Tertulliau, so in Irenaeus, we find three different forms of the Creed. They are arranged, article by article, in the follovvino- syllabus ; ^ Syllabus of Creed Forms Found in Iren^us. Book First, c. 10, 1. (1) Faith in one Ood the Father Almighty ; Book Third, e. 4, 2. (1) Who believe in Ode God the Framer of Heaven and Earth, Book Fourth, c. 33, 7. (1) His faith is entire In one God Almightv, of whom are all things ; (3) made flesh for our salvation, of a Virgin, (4) and the Passion, (5) and the Rising from the dead (6) and the bodily AscL :sion into Heaven, (T) (8) And His Coming from the Heavens ir tlie glory of the Father . . . that He may administer just judgment to them all, (3) who submit I'ed to the birth which was to be of the Virgin ; (4) who suffered al.-.o under Pontius Pilate. (3) and risen again. (6) and being re- ceived in brightness (T) (8) will come in glory as the Judge of them that are judged (9) and in the Ghost, Holy (9) (3) the Son of God become man (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 91 (9) And in the Spirit of God i\ THE SYMBOL Boc't First, c. 10, 1. (10) who declared . . . the CEoonomies, (11) such as . . . per- severed in His love, whether from the first or after penitency, (12) and to raise up all Hesh of all liumau nature. Book Third, c. 4, 2. (10) (11) (12| Book Fourth, c. 83, 7. (10) the original sys- tem of tlje Church in the whole world " (11) (12) [W^ vs. From u,ll of these forms the seventh article is wanting and the eleventh, which latter, how- ever, is very clearly implied in the words cited in the first column. We note the same peculi- arity iii these as in the forms found in Tertul- lian — a marked difference in the wording of the several articles, which one can hardly J8 To Irenteus the Church is not so much ar article of the faith as its teacher and guardian. Not tlie less was tliere mention of it in his Creed, as appears even more clearly from the summary of the Creed that he gives again in Bk. 5, c. 20 : " But those who are of the Church have a legu- lar path, encircling the whole world, the tr? 'ition thereof from the Apostles being secure ; which patli grants us to behold that all have one and the same faith, since all teach one and the same Father, believe the same Economy of the Son of God's Incarnation, and know the same gift of the Spirit, and meditate on the same precepts, and maintain the same form of government over the Church, and wait for the same coming of the Lord, and maintain the same salvation of the whole man, i. e., of the soul and body." 93 ll OF THE APOSTLE S. believe to have been accidental. One thing is plain : neither TertuUian nor Irenseus gives us the very words, the ipsissima verba, of their Rule o£ Faith. Those words were writ- ten in their memories from the day of their baptism, but as if to baffle the curiosity of the curious, they do not choose to write them out. To try, therefore, to piece together from thoir writings the fabric of the Creed just as It stood in their day, were as futile as the act of one who should essay to build upon the shifting sands. But knowing what we do and what ^^^ey tell us of the veneration iu which this Rale of Truth was held, the jeal us care with which it was guarded, the pains that were taken to grave it " on the fleshly tablets of the heart " of lettered and unlettered alike, the absolute oneness of the Faith of which it was the authorized Formula, the quality of unchangeableness that belonged and still belongs to it, we seem certainlv not to lack warrant for affirming that the Creed learned by Irenaeus from Polycarp was, article for article, if not word for word, tL same as that which was recited two centuries after in the Church 93 I; % - rl: THE SYMBOL of Smyrna ; and that the Creed in which the catechumen TertuUian professed his faith on the day of his baptism, was, in like manner, the same as that whicii St. Augustine expounds in hii homilies. This Rule of Truth, Ireuseus assures us in the passage cited above, was the same in the East as in the AVest. And it was, he further assures us, transmitted by word of mouth. " To this Rule," he says, "consent many nations of the barbarians, those I mean who believe in Christ, having salvation written by the Spirit in their hearts, without paper and ink, and diligently keeping the old Tradition, who believe in One God the Framer of Heaven and Earth and of all things that are in them, by Christ Jesus the Sen of God." After which he goes on to give the other articles that are to be found in the second column of the syl- labus. VII .^?.^?.^y!?^?.^:.: Let us here pause to consider how untenable is the position of the votaries of historical criticism. Re- 94 OF THE APOSTLES. lying mainly, if not wholly, on the testi- mony of Tertullian and Irenaeus, they affirm that the Symbol existed in the latter half of the second century. But it did not exist in the earlier half of the same century say the critics, because it is not to be found in any writings. Consequently, it must have been composed about the middle of that cen- tury. By whom, and where? Probably at Kome, by some one or other whose name has been withheld. '^ We are asked to believe that the Creed of the Christian Church, the Creed which we know on the testimony of witnesses who lived at the time, to have been, ah-eady in the second half of the century, the unvary- ing Standard of the Christian Faith in all the Churches from the West even to the farthest East, was composed about the middle of that same century by an anonymous somebody. This Creed, which all the Bishops assembled at Nice could scarce venture to change by the addition of words that did but more explicitly declare the meaning of one or two of its articles, is assumed to have been framed and imposed " Dogma, Gerarchio e Culto, p. 324. 95 THE SYMBOL upon the Christian world less than two cen- turies before by somebody or other whose very name is buried in oblivion. Credat Judaeus ! But this is not all. The very men, on whose testimony the existence of the Creed in the latter half of the second century is known to the critics, declare repeatedly, in the most ex- plicit and emphatic way, that it came down from the Apostles. This, however, as well as some other points, must be dealt with in another chapter. 96 i OF THE APOSTLES. < li] i CHAPTER III. HARNACK ON THE CREED. I. I have snid that Irenaeus is our .' Harnack's greatest witness to the Apostolic I eq^St authorship of the Symbol. The disciple of Polycarp, he is but one step re- moved from St. John the Evangelist ; hailino- from Asia Minor, Bishop in Gaul, he is the connecting link between the East and the West. Before citing his testimony, however, and that of Tertulhan, some notice must be taken of a singular opinion of Harnack's. This view of the Rule of Truth cited by Iren^us is part of Harnack's general theory regarding the origin of the Syr-bol, and cannot profitably, or indeed at all, be dealt with apart from it. Also, we must take account of the methods and mental equipment of the man. 7 97 i i ;, I :l THE SYMBOL Harnack has said his last, or rather his latest, word on the origin o£ the Symbol in an article written for the third edition of Herzog's Eedlencyclojjadle, which has been translated into English by the Rev. Stewart Means and edited by Thomas Bailey Saunders.' Splen- didly equipped, as this distinguished German writer is, in respect of mental gifts and scholar- ship, he yet lacks some qualifications that are simply indispensable to the one who would trace the origin of the Symbol. He lacks the gift of Faith, to begin with ; he lacks the con- ception of the Church of Christ as one in all nations— one Fold in which there is one Faith and one Baptism ; and he lacks the knowledge, or, at any rate, the realization of the fact that the Symbol was not first given in writing, nor handed down from one generation to another in writing, nor suffered to be put at all in writing until the DiscipUne of the Secret began to be relaxed. As a consequence of these defi- ciencies, there are some things that Harnack does not see at all ; and, in the case of the 1 The Apostles' Creed, by Adolf Haruack. London : Adam and Charles Black. 1901. 98 OF THE APOSTLES. i things that he does see, he not infrequently mapnfies what is trifling in itself, and makes little ot, or Ignores, what is important. Grop- ing m the dim liglif, of those early ages, he re- minds one of the blind man in the Gospel whose sight was being given back to him, and who at first saw "men as trees walking." In short, llarnack lacks the clearer insight which Faith gives, and he lacks the sense of perspective which would enable him to see things in their true proportions. n. Let me give a few examples of Harnack's work as a critic from the little book before me. At page 4, he says: "Indeed, the Eastern Church has at no time traced any creed to an Apostohc origin." This is a case of ignoring- positive testimony. The Fathers of the East^ ern Church will be cited later on in rebuttal. At page 27, he draws attention to the position Of remissionem peccatorum, resurrectionem carms et vitam aeternam per sanctam ecclesiam " m the Creed of the Carthaginian Church 99 Specimens of His Critical Work. illi I |ihl! IM I. i! 5 THE SYMBOL Here, being dim of vision, he mistakes the baptismal interrogatory for the Symbol. The heretics, says St. Cyprian, from whom the words are taken, "lie in the interrogatory when they say, ' Dost thou believe in the re- mission of sius . . . through the Holy Church?' since they have not the Church." ' At page 17 we read : " I cannot, however, convince°mvself that twelve divisions [of the Creed] were originally intended. No one who wanted to construct a creed with twelve articles in three main divisions would be so clumsy as to divide it into 1 + 7 + 4, or rather 2 + 6 + 4." It is pretty safe to say that twelve divisions were not dh-ectly intended; but indirectly or incidentally, they were. In building the fabric of their Creed on the lines of the Trinitarian Formula laid down for them by the Master, the Apostles found it needful to use seven explicit words in telling all that was to be told about the Word of the second article, and four more a Ep. ad Magnum (Migne, torn. 3, col. 1144). The words •' carnis resurrectionem " are not in Cyprian's formula, which occurs in this epistle, and also, with theorder of the Dhrases inverted, in Ep. 70 ad Januarium. ^ lOQ OP THE APOSTLES. to describe the Spirit of the third, His work, and His gifts to men. The result is that what was originally 1 + 1 + 1 became 1+7 + 4. Had they been guided solely by a sense of symmetry, Hke Harnack, the 1 + 1 + 1 would have issued in tetrads, thus : 4 + 4 + 4. As it is, the ApostoHc Symbol, comprising twelve articles, which the German Rationalist, looking at it from an aesthetical point of view, finds so unsymmetrical, has ever edified and rilll edifies . Faith. And Faith in its fulness has a sym- metry of its own. The Author and Finisher of it, too, who is the Architect of this our earthly dweUing, uses Faith as enshrined in the Symbol to build Himself a stately mansion --" a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens." It is not symmetry of form but adaptabiUty to a purpose that is sought in an instrument. At page 15 we read : « The Greek text [of the Old Roman Creed] must be regarded as the original, for at Rome the Symbol was for a long time used only in Greek. It was not un- til long after the Greek text was in use that the Latin text was adopted as a parallel form." 101 THE SYMBOL il i According to Harnack himself the Symbol was the Baptismal Creed o£ the Roman Church from the mi idle cf the second century, when he supposes it was drawn up. Now, while large numbers of the converts in Rome even in the days of St. Paul were Greeks, as appears from the last chapter of his Epistle to the Bornans ; and while Greek was largely used by the lettered among the Christians in the first centuries, as is shown by inscriptions found in the Roman Ca'jacombs ; the fact remains that the language of the Roman people was never any other than the Latin,^ and that many, not to eay the greater number, of the candidates for baptism were unlettered, and spoke no other tongue than the Latin. There- fore the Roman Church must haN^e used the Symbol in Latin from the first. And the Latin form must have existed from the first side by side with the Greek form. Harnack, in this case, ignores the fact that the Symbol, was not given from the first, nor transmitted, in writing. And he forgets that the catechetical and con- • Cf. Cursus Scripturae Sacrae, Auctoribus R. Comely, S.J., et al., (Editio altera), vol. I, p. 3«3. 102 OF THE APOSTLES. fessional use of the Symbol antedates the liturgical. Original Text of the Old Roman Creed. III. Is it quite certain that even the Greek text of the Roman Symbol existed before the Latin? that the Roman Symbol, when first committed to writing, was written in Greek ? It is not; it is a probable or plausible con- jecture; perhaps not even that. The text of the Symbol of Marcellus of Ancyra, which Harnack points to in proof of his statement, cannot be accepted as proof, for two reasons. The first is that the original text of the Symbol of Marcellus has'' not come down to us. That which has come down to us is found in the pages of Epi- phanius,* who wrote in Greek, and of course would cite the Symbol in Greek. It is more than likely that Marcellus, had he written his Confession of Faith to Pope Julius from An- cyra, would have done so in Greek. But he * Adv. Haer., lib. 3, Haer. 73 (Migne, P. G., torn. 42). 103 I sT ! ' I ^ < i' "■{"■■ THE SYMBOL wrote in Rome, after a stay in that city, as he tells us himself,^ of one year and three months — quite long enough to enable him to present his Confession of Faith in the language of the Latin Church, if he were so minded. But there is another and more cogent reason why we cannot take the text of this Symbol of Marcellus, which would be the ear- liest known, as proof that the Greek text of the Roman Symbol was the original one. '^ tie Symbol of Marcellus is not the Roman Symbol at all. How is this shown ? It is shown by the testimony of Marcellus himself, who declares dis- tinctly in his Letter to Julias that he got his Sym- bol from his forefathers in the faith ; ^ hence not in Rome, nor in the West, but in Asia. And the Symbol itself witnesses to the truth of his testimony, for it ends with the words " C'^^jy aiuiviov^''* -which were not part of the Roman Symbol for many a long day after the time of Marcellus, but are found, in terms or equiva- lently, in the earliest Eastern Symbols. There still xcmains the text cited in the Psalter turn * Migne, P. L., torn. 8, col. 916. « Ibid. 104 OF THE APOSTLES. Athelstani. But the MS. of the Cod. Law diams, which embodies the Latin text, is earlier by well-nigh three centuries than that of the so-cj Ued Psalter of iEthelstan.' At page 80, Harnack says: "That the Roman Church after the sixth century gradually let itself be separated from and finally robbed of the symbol which it had previously guarded so faithfully, is a striking phenomenon which has not yet had its causes clearly explained." As a matter of fact, the Roman Church never for one day let itself be separated from its Symbol, and never was robbed of it. What, then, happened ? This is what happened. From about the beginning of the sixth century and for a period of some two or three hundred years, the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed took the place of the Old Roman in the Tra- ditio and Hedditio Symholi. This was owing to the spread of Arianisia in the West. But the Roman Creed still remained in use in the baptismal interrogation, in the baptism of in- fants, as Burn shows at page 232 of the work » C£. Burn, An Introduction to the Creeds, p. 199. 105 ! I THE SYMBOL already referred to, in the recitation of the Divine Office, and in private worship. When the shorter Symbol becomes once more the Baptismal Creed given to catechumens in the Roman Church, it is found to be no longer the Old Roman but the New Roman, or, as some prefer to regard it, the Gallican Symbol, which is identical with the Apostles' Creed of to-day. IV. Measuring Creeds with A Tape Line. If we are to measure Creeds with a tape line ; if we are to distinguish cue from another by the lesser or greater number of words they contain, Harnack is, to a certain extent, right. But if the true way to measure Creeds is by their meaning, by the articles of Faith which they embody, then Harnack is wrong, ridicu- lously wrong. The twelve articles of the Rule of Faith need not be of exactly the same length, like the twelve inches that make up the car- penter's rule. Faith is not reckoned in feet and inches. The second article of the Nicene Creed contains almost as many words as the 106 OF THE APOSTLES. twelve articles of the Old Roman Creed. ^ But the Fathers of Nice could have said with truth that the second article as expounded by them was no longer than before. Exposition sets forth more clearly and defines more accurately the meaning of a statement, but does not alter it, nor add one iota to it. The best way to show how lack of perspective has led Harnack astray here is to place side by side the Old Roman Creed and the Apostles' Creed as we have it to-day. The additions to the former, which are in ever} case but an explicit setting forth of what was implicit, are put in italics. Old Romax Creed. Apostles' Creed. (1) I believe in God the (1) I believe in God the Father Almighty ; Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth ; (2) And in Christ Jesus, (2) And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord, His only Son, our Lord, (3) Born of the Holy Ghost and the Virgin Mary, (3) Who was conceived of the Holy Ghost, boru of the Virgin Mary, » The Creed contains 57 words, the article 54, by actual count. 107 THE SYMBOL 1 i Apostles' Creed. (4) Sufferednnder Pontius Pilate, was crucified, d?>d, and was buried. He de- scended into hell ; (5) The third day He rose again from the dead ; (6) Ascended into heaven, (7) Sitteth at the right hand of God the Father Al- mighty, (8) whence he shall come to judge the living and the dead. (9) J believe in the Holy Ghost, (10) the holy Catholic Church, the comi union of saints, (11) tlip remission of sins, (12) the resurrection of tbo body, and the life ever- lasting. It may be remarked, in passing, that this division of the Creed into articles, being that of the Old Rompn Creed, should be regarded as the true one, although it is not the one generally given by theologians. The words added to the first article are clearly implied in 108 Old Roman Creed. (4) Crucified under Pon- tius Pilate, and buried ; (5) Rose again the third day from the dead ; (6) Ascended into heaven, (7) Sitteth at the right hand of the Father, (8) whence 'ae shall come to judge the living and the dead. (9) And in the Holy Ghost, (10) the holy Church, (11) the remission of s. as, (12) the resurrection of the flesh. OF THE APOSTLES. ;* Almighty"; "born" of the third article implies "conceived"; "crucified" of the fourth, "suffered" and "died"; "buried," the descent into " hell," seeing that the soul as well as the body is to be assigned its locus. "God Almighty" of the seventh article serves but to identify the Father at whose right hand Christ sitteth, with tlie " Father " of the first article. Expounding the tenth article, which affirmed "the holy Ohurch " merely in the Africa! eed of his day, St. Augustine adds, " Catholi of course." ^ And elsewhere, in his 'ixposition ^f this same article, he declares that " Church " is to be understood here, " not only of that which holds its pilgrim way on earth," but also of " that which in heaven ever cleaves to God."'" The words "communion of saints " have thus been inserted to indicfite that the "Church " signifies the Kingdom of God in its widest sense. Finally, the adjunct "life everlasting" defines the true meaning of " the resurrection," which is not a resurrection if I 18 ' I.J ' De Fide et Symbolo, c. 10 (Migne, torn. 40, col. 195). ^^ Enchiridion, c. 56 (lb., col. 858). 109 I THE SYMBOL unto a mortal life, but a resurrection unto a life without end. All this is very plain and simple to one who sees with the eyes of Faith. But Harnack's eyes were holden ; he could not see it. And so, having no rule but the tape Une to measure Creeds withal, he has committed himself to the unhistorlcal and astonishing statement that the Roman Church actually allowed herself to be robbed of her ancient Symbol. He marvels much how she could have done so, and seeks a solution of what is to him a puzzling prob- lem. A Catholic child could easily have solved it for him. There are other instances of inaccurate, mis- leading, and false statements in this little work of Haniack's, but the foregoing will be enough to shoNV how unsafe a guide he is in tracnig the Symbol to its origin." u There in one statement more, in a footnote at page 11, which must not go unehHllengecl. In reforenoe to the legend that each of the twelve Apostles contnbnted an article to the Creed, he observes : •' The Ronuvn Catech sm hal nevertheless retained it." The Reman Catechuin has done nothing of the kind. Tlve compilers give as an alter- uZe explanation of the nanie Symbol havmg been be- 110 OF THE APOSTLES. I V. It is now time to say a word i Harnack's about Harnack's own theory o£ • the Origin the origin of the Symbol, and to j?.'^.Tf!F.!:^?.?^?: deal with his attempt to prove that the Rule of Truth cited by Irenaeus was neither a Baptismal Cteed nor identical with TertuUian's Rule of Faith. Briefly, his theory is that the Old Roman Symbol was composed in stowed, as they take it, by the Apostles, that it was com- posed (conflata) of the combined sentiments of all (ex variis sententiis quas singuli in unum contulerunt), the other explanation being that it was to be a " tesseia " or badge of the Christian Faith. Rufinus uses words which convey the same meaning as those of the Catechism in relating, not simply how the Symbol came by its name, but how it was composed by tlie Twelve — "in unum con- ferendo quod sentiebant unusquisque." In fact the com- pilers of the Catechism are but citing once more the ancient tradition given by Rufinus as to tlie origin of the Symbol. And they do not commit themselves so definitely as he does to the statement tliat eacliof the twelve Apostles liad a hand in the composition of it. They sim|)ly say tliat tlie Apostles " drew out distinctly the most iinportant points of the Christian Faith in the twelve articles of the Creed." And yet Hurnack himself, at page 18, tells v^ that Rufinus " knows nothing about "the legend; "all tliat he knows was the common composition of the Roman symbol by the Apostles soon after Pentecost and before the separation." Ill THE SYMBOL Borne about the middle of the second century, and that it was not till the early part of the fourth century, when the Churches of the East, as he supposes, first came to know and value the Koman Symbol, that the formation of sym- bols began in the East. Before that time, the East, he maintains, had indeed an " old, flex- ible, christological rule," also " ceremonial or polemical form u1 is of belief in One God the Creator, and His Only Son Christ," but no " established baptismal confession of faith." " Now, this theory is simply pulverized by the testimony of Irenaeus, if it be but fairly inter- preted. Hence Harnack's attempt, by all the plausible arts of which he is master, to turn the edge of this testimony and save his theory from destruction. How does he set about doing this ? He starts with the assumption that no fixed baptismal Confession of Faith existed in the East in the time of Irenaeus. This he bases on the fact that none but fragmentary formulas, of a flexible character, are to be found in jhe early Christian writings of the East. u Op. cit., p. 48. 113 Affainst this we set the words of Ire- OF THE APOSTLES. it naeus that " the real Church hath one and the same Faith throughout the world,"'^ and that, while the languages of the world differ, " the tenor of the Tradition is one and the same."'* Where Faith is one and Baptism one there is but one Baptismal Creed. Why, then, those varied and fragmentat^ creeds? " For this reason," says the Anglican Blunt, " the creeds never occur . an unbroken form in the first centuries. They were committed to memory by the faithful, but never to writing, that heresy might not learn to simulate the faith."'^ It would seem that the DiscAplhia Arcani still withholds its secrets from Harnack. Nor does he appear to realize that one and th6 same for- mulary may serve now a catechetical or con- fessional purpose, now a liturgical ; be used at one time as a token of membership and com- munion, at another as a test of orthodoxy. It is this last use of the Symbol of the true Faith » Adv. Haer., Bk. i, o. 10, n. 3. " Ibid., n, 2. ** Blunt's Theological Dictionary, edited by the Rev. John Henry Blunt. Art. " Creeds." As to the reason here assigned see Introduction, pp. 17-23. 8 113 I> ■ THE SYMBOL that is brought prominently into view in the East during the second, third, and fourth centuries. As new forms of heresy arose, new adaptations of the one and unchangeable Creed of the Church were devised to meet them, and we- find St. Hilary bitterly bewailing this multiplication of " faiths " in his day. VI. Iren^us Miscon- strued. The famous German scholar and critic constructs a "confes- sional formula" out of frag- ments gathered from four or five different sources ; and, as he was " enabled to make a similar conjecture in Justin's case, so it is probable that not only in Ivenseus' time but also in Justin's " the formula so constructed "existed in the East." Now, this formula, fashioned, be it remembered, though out of pre- existing material, by Harnack himself, " Irenaeus made the foundation of his ^^'^"''^ rf;? riA,<;££«s," or Rule of Trutli. But it is probable that Irenaeus had to incorporate in his Canon, be- fore it reached its final completion, an " his- 114 OP THE APOSTLES. w m torico-christological formula of confession con- taining the sentences about the birth, suffering under Pontius Pilate," etc., becau3e this latter formula "is perhaps, or even probably, to be distinguished " from the one that was made the foundation of the Rule of Truth. '^ This bit of scientific guesswork is interest- ing, if not, very instructive. But what does Ilarnack ttike Irenseus for? Does he take him for a fool that he should make him try to re- fute the heresies of his day by the help of so crazy a piece of furniture as this patched-up formulary ? And where is there room for con- jecture when Irenaeus himself still lives in his works, and is able to speak for himself ? It is so far from being true that there is anything in the writings of Irenaeus to show " that he is com- piling" his Canon "independently out of a large number of fixed confessional formulas of the Church," '^ that the very reverse is the case. Irenseus never cites this Rule of Trutli, never appeals to this Rule of Truth but as to a something objective, a something quite in- w Op. cit., pp. G3-64. " lb. 115 THE SYMBOL dependent both of himseK and of those he is addressing, a something that existed in the Church throughout the world from the first, a something that was always and everywhere the same, a something, in fine, that had the authority of Apostolic institution. He declares that the Rule of Truth is bestowed " by Bap- tism " on every Christian, for Baptism alone gives a right to the Symbol. The description that he gives of it tallies with that which Ter- tullian gives of the Rule of Faith which the African Church followed. He tells us that the Churches throughout all the world followed this same Rule of Truth," '^ and TertuUian in Africa tells us the same thing. He distin- guishes it from " the preacliing of the Apostles, and the teaching of the Lord," as " that which is put into our mouths by the Apostles." '' He testifies that Polycarp "received from the Apostles that one and only truth, which hath been handed on by the Church," and that this " Tradition which " the Apostles " delivered to those whom they entrusted with the Churches " w Adv. Haer., Bk. 1, c. 10, n. 1. » lb., Bk. 2, c. 35, n. 4. 116 OF THE APOSTLES. is the " Rule " to which « consent many nations of the barbarians," who receive it "without letters," and who, "i£ one should tell them of the inventions of the heretics," would " by that old Tradition Apostolic . . . admit not even to a passing glance of the mind any of their monstrous sayings." - Lastly, he appeals to the " Tradition " of the Roman Church, "which it hath from the Apostles," "which Tradition proclaims One God Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth." '' If this Rule of Truth, the same in all Churches, W3s bestowed by Baptism, what be- comes of Harnack's assumption that there Avas no " established baptismal confession of faith " in the East during the second and third centuries ? Irenaeus himself lived in the East, came from the East, and ought to know better. As for the word "canon," if it does not mean an "established" rule, one would like to know what it does mean. Again, if the "Rule " of Irenaeus was an " Old Tradition Apostolic," could it have been also drawn up by himself? » Ib.,Bk. 3, c. 4, IX. 2. ^ lb., c. 3, n. 3. 117 < [ THE SYMBOL Finally, if this Rule existed in Rome, too, and in Africa, what else could it be but the Symbol of the Roman Church and TertulUan's Rule of Faith? Tertullian NOT Duly Weighed. VII. Let us leave Gaul and cross into Africa. Harnack tells us that he has "traced the old Roman symbol to the time of Tertullian." " We shall help him to trace it a good bit farther. And Tertullian is the very man who will enable us to do so. Where did Tertullian get his Rule of Faith? That sturdy champion of Christianity does not leave us one instant in doubt as to where he got it. He got it from the Church, the Church got it from the Apos- tles, the Apostles from Christ, Christ from God.^^ At any rate this is what he tells us; and we seem to catch a hint of what is passing in his mind from those words in Matthew where our Lord tells His Apostles that " all power is given " Him " in heaven and on earth," and where, in 22 Op. cit., p. 70. 28 De Praescript, c. 37 (Migne, torn. 2, col. 50). 118 OF THE APOSTLES. .iu virtue of that power, He bids them go forth to teach and baptize all nations. AVe understand Tertullian to mean that the Apostles got the Rule of Faith from Christ, in the sense that they got from Christ the Faith itself and the authority to formulate such points of it as they deemed needful to grave " on the fleshly tab- lets " of the hearts of those who were first to "believe" before they could be "baptized." If one thing more than another is clear from the writings of Tertullian, it is that there did not dwell in his mind the shadow of a shade of doubt that the Apostles themselves drew up the Rule of Faith. He regards it as " incredi- ble " that they should not " have set forth to all every clause of the Rule in order (omnem ordinem regulae)." '* He points out how im- possible it would be for " so many and so great Churches to stray into the one Faith," and that what is " one among many comes not by hap, but by tradition." '^ Hq declares that " this Rule was in use from the beginning of the Gospel, even before the earliest heresies." 26 •'■■ ., c. 27. ^ Adv. Prax., c. 8. 2fi lb., c. 28. 119 THE SYMBOL VIII. Ij I •♦ CONTESSER ARIT." But Harnack's own words shall serve to show how Tertul- lian witnesses to the Apostolic authorship of the Symbol. He tells us (p. 70) that it " is this [the Roman] symbol he [TertuUian] means when he writes de praescr. haer. 36;" and cites in part the following passage : " But if thou art near to Italy, thou hast Rome, whence we also have an authority at hand. That Church how happy, into which the Apostles poured all their doctrine with their blood ; where Peter has a like passion with the Lord ; where Paul is crowned with an end like the Baptist's ; where the Apostle John, after he is plunged into boiling oil, and has suffered nothing, is banished to an island. Let us see what she learned, what she taught, when she gave the Symbol also to the Churches of Africa. She confesses one God, the Creator of the universe, and Christ Jesus, the Son of God the Creator, born of the Virgin Mary, and the resurrection of the flesh." It is of these last words that Harnack says : " This is the symbol that he means." Just so. 130 OF THE APOSTL ES. Rut Tertullian te^jtifies that the Church of Rome got this Symbol from the Apostles, and gave it to the Churches of Africa, i.e., of pro- consular Africa and the parts adjacent. This is " what she learned " '^ from Peter and Paul, her first teachers in the Faith, and this is " what she taught, when she admitted thu Africans also into fellowship in that Faith by delivering to them its Symbol." ^^ Tertullian answers his own question, and he answers it by citing the "tessera" cr Symbol of the Faith. The words of the text are, " cum Africanis quoque ecclesiis contesserarit." This " contesserarit," a word coined by Tertullian himself, wherein to hide his Symbol, seems to have puzzled editors and translators aUke. Some of the editors have changed it into " contestatur," which is never found with a dative, which as a present tense would not follow an aorist, and which gives no meaning; others into " con- tesseratur," which is from the right verb, but ^ It is not " quae " but " quid," not " what things " but •' what thing." * Nothing short of a paraphrase can bring out the full meaning of " contesserarit." 1^ i I t; THE SYMBOL not in the rifflit mood nor tense. The trans- lator of this passage, in The Faith of Cath- olics, renders it ; " Let us see what she hath learned, what taught, what fellowship she hath had with the Churches of Africa likewise." But " didicerlt " and " docuerit " are aorists, not present perfect tenses, for it was from the Apostles the Roman Church " learned " that Faith which she afterwards " taught " the Churches of Africa. And "cum Africanis quoque ecclesiis contesserarit " does not yield the meaning " what fellowship, etc." but rather " when she gave the symbol of fellowship in Christ to the African Churches." '' Her M It would seem that the translator based his rendering on the reading of this passage given by Burn at page 49 of his work. " Videamus, quid didicerit, quid docuerit, quid cum Africanis quoque ecclesiis contesserauit" This I take to be another attempt at mending a text, which stood in need of interpretation, not mending. Of course there should be no comma after " Videamus ; " " quid " is the interrogative, and introduces a dependent question. Ob- viously, then, " contesseravit " is a mistake. There is a parallelism of construction in the " quid "clauses, and one needs not to have studied the classics at Eton or Oxford to know that a dependent question never has its verb in the indicative. But perhaps " contesseravit " is a misprint. The " cum " of this reading is a preposition ; the " cum " 123 OF THE APOSTLES. Apostolic Symbol was the incorrupt germ whence the virgin Mother Church of Rome begot her virgin daughters in Africa also. And, to vary the metaphor with the varying use of the Symbol, this was the signet ring she put upon their fingers on the day she clothed them in the white robes of their Baptism— the seal and sure token of their birthright in God, their espousals in Christ, and their fellowship in the one Faith. The word « tessera," from which Tertullian boldly coined the verb "contesse- rare " (not the first nor yet the last sample of liis work in this line), means " symbol," and we all know, or ought to know, that the symbol of fellowship among the early Christians was no other than the Apostolic Symbol. A few chapters back, in the same work, Tertullian uses the expression, « contesseratio hospitalita- of Migne's text, a conjunctive adverb ; but between tlie two readings there is no essential difference of meaning. Whether " Africanis ecclesiis," in Migne's, is a dative or an ablative we can only conjecture. The privilege of coming a new verb must carry with it the privilege of saymg what case it shall govern— saeimnt quantumvia gmmmatici. (The word contesserauit given above is so printed in Burn's book. The u of the last syllable is old Latin spelling for v.) 123 t ^ If- THE SYMBOL tis " to signify how the Symbol of their com- mon Faith served the early Christians as a token whereby they could recognize and, recognizing, give the right hand of fellowship and hospi- tality to their pilgrim brethren. The Symbol was their test of Church membership, by means of which, as the Anglican Blunt well expresses it in the work already cited, " in the first troubled years of the Church, Christians pro- ceeding from one point of the world to another were at once known and received into unre- served communion as brethren in one common Lord." IX. Conjectures. Readers of the Breviary will remember that in the Ofl&ce of St. Cecilia we are told how the Saint sent Vespasian for baptism to Pope Urban, and how "signo quod acceperat invenit sanctum Urbanum." What was this "sign" if not the Baptismal Symbol? We may conjec- ture, also, that when our Blessed Lord likens the Kingdom of Heaven to a woman who takes a little leaven and hides it in three measures 12-t ■»n OF THE APOSTLES. of meal, till the whole mass is leav :ied (Matt 13: 33; Luke 13 : 21), Hehasth • Svmbol ir His mind's eye. The woman is tij Olnrch, and the leaven is the Symbol which she takes and hides away for a space in the multitude of all nations and tribes and tongues, till the whole mass is leavened— till the power of paganism is broken, and the peoples of the earth gather, in the open day, around the stand- ard of the Cross. The (Gospel was to be preached from the housetops from the very first. But the Symbol, which was not given openly to men, nor "written with ink on paper, but graved on the fleshly tablets of the heart," was, like the leaven in the meal, secretly doing its work in all the world. So far as I have been able to see, the only one of the Fathers who notes and lays stress on the use of "hid" in the parable of the leaven is St. Clement of Alexandria, who lived at a time and in a place where the Discipline of the Secret seems to have been observed with more than ordinary strictness. " Now even also by means of the parable of the leaven," he ob- serves, " does our Lord signify the couceal- 125 • :m THE SYMBOL s t- ment (t^" ^ruxpo4'iv'^^ for He says, " The king- dom of heaven is like to leaven^ which a woman took and hid in three bushels of meal ^ until the whole was leavened." — Strom., 1. 5, n. 12. We have next to see what answer can be made to those who say that the tradition of the ApostoHc authorship of the Symbol was not only unknown in the East, but that even in the West, St. Augustine, so far from adhering to it, says expressly that the very words which compose the Symbol were taken from the Scripture. i 126 OF THE APOSTLES. m CHAPTER IV. ST. AUGUSTIT^E AND THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE SYMBOL. I. St. Augus- tine AND THE Ancient Tra- dition. It is urged that St. Augustine contradicts the ancient tradition of the Apostolic authorship of the Symbol' The passage to which appeal is made occurs in a i. . y on the Symbol, and runs as follows : « The words you have heard are scattered here and there in the Sacred Scriptures, but have thence been gathered and put into one formula." ^ Now the tradition has it that the Apostles composed the Symbol on the eve of their dispersion, which took place before the books of the New * Dogma, Oerarchia e Ciilto, p. .323 "Verba quae audistis per divinas Scripturas sparsa sunf jed indecollectaet ad unum redacta. I^Symb. aTcatech Migne, torn. 40, col. 627. ^aiecn.. 127 f t i f T HE SYMBOL Testament were written. Hence the passage in question runs counter to the tradition. One way o£ meeting this difficulty, undoubt- edly a grave difficulty because of the great authority of St. Augustine, would be to make the Saint mean by Sacred Scriptures the Old Testament only. But this would be rather an evading of the difficulty, for the expression " Sacred Scriptures " includes the New Testa- ment as well as the Old. It is more than doubtful, too, whether all the words of the Symbol are to be found in the Old Testament. The words " under Pontius Pilate," at any rate, are not. Happily there is a better way. First of all, let us see what St. Augustine says in his other sermons on the Symbol. Two of those given in the fifth volume of Migne's edition of the Saint's works, namely, 212 and 214, are unquestionably genuine. In both of these it is not the words of the Symbol but the doctrine which St. Angustiae says is contained in the Scriptures. Nor does he say or in any way imply that the doctrine was taken from the Scriptures in the first instance. " All that you are about to hear in the Symbol," he tells 1^8 «W'' OF THE APOSTLES. his catechumens, " is contained in the Scrip- tures." And again : " This, then, is the Sym- bol, with the contents of which you have been made familiar ah-eady through the Scriptures and the preaching of the Church." 3 He opens his mind even more fully in the other sermon. '^ "The truths," he there tells his heartrs, « which you are about to receive in a compendious form, to be committed to memory ana orally professed, are not new to you nor unheard. For hi the Sacred Scriptures and in sermons you have been wont to find them set forth in many ways." St. Augustine plainly does not mean here that the authors of the Symbol picked the words which compose it from various parts of the Scriptures—an utterly unlikely tiling, in any case. Nor does he even mean that they actually took the truths embodied in it from the Scripture, where, of course, they are to be found, with many other truths besides. He simply means that catechumens could learn and did learn from the Scripture, as well as from the pieach- »Serm. 212 (Migne. torn. 38, col. 1058). * Serm. 214 ad inii. (lb. col. 1068). 9 Vi") TH E SYMBOL ing of the Church, all the truths contained in the Symbol, long before the Symbol itself was given to them. The Homily TE SYMBOLO AD CaTECHU- MENOS. II. It will still be urged that, in the homily which is entitled de Symholo ad Cafechimienos, it is declared in set terms, as cited above, that the very words of the Symbol were taken from the Scriptures. Granted; but it is only so much the worse for the homily that it should affirm a thing so improbable. That homily has too long masqueraded under the great name of Augustine. The proofs of its spuriousness that I am able to put my finger on seem to me at least overwhelming. To begin with, the homily in question is tainted in its source. It was found from the first in bad company, so to say. It is one of four which, in codices dating from 800 A.D., are styled Be Symbolo Llbri Quatuor, and attributed to Augustine.^ Three of these are 8 Migne, loc. cit. 130 OF THE APOSTLES . to-day rejected as spurious on all hands. The fourth is, from the nature of the case, suspect. Possidius knew only of three s-ich discourses on the Symbol by St. Augustine, which he cites as "De Symbolo, tractatus tres." ^ Two of these are readily identified as the sermons numbered respectively 212 and 214, already cited. The third, whether it exists among the writings of St. Augustine that liave come down to us or not, is not any of the four ad Cate- chumenos. It remains to show this of the only one of them which is p^enerally admitted as genuine,^ that one, namely, which comes first in order in Migne's collection. In a footnote at page 59, it was pointed out that the author of this homily cites " in vitara aeternam " as part of the Creed, which St. Augustine never does in any of the writ- ings that are certainly his. Nor did these words form part of the Creed known to the contemporaries of Augustine in the West, «Cf. Migne's Index to the works of St. Augustine, col. 20. J Pearson, however, in his volume of critical notes on the Creed, gives the reference simply as " auctor homiliae de Symbolo ad Gat^chumenos. " 131 ! i T HE SYMBOL Rufinus, St. Jerome, and St. Ambrose, if the last-named be indeed the author o£ the Expla. natio Symboli ad Imtiandos. The author of the homily seems to have borrowed the idea, if not the very words, from Sermon 40 of St. John Chrysostom,' where we read : " And as the word ' resurrection ' is not enough to con- vey the whole truth (for many who rose again died again, as did those who rose again under the old dispensation, Lazarus, and those who rose when Christ died), we are taught to say, And in the life eve^^lasting.'* At page 2i3 of his work. Burn says : " The addition vitam aeterncm had been in use in the African Church since the third century." He means that it had been in use as part of the Symbol, and in this he is astray. The African Church got its Symbol from the Ro- man and kept it unchanged till after St. Augustine's time. How can it be mamtanied that St. Augustine, expounding the Symbol to Africans in the African Church, deUberately left out so notable a part as this would be of the Faith in which they had been baptized ? B Jiiguu, P. Q; torn. 61. 133 itL. im. OF THE A POSTLES. Immediately after his comment on « the resur rection of the flesh," in De Fide et Symholo, he says : « This is the Faith which is summed up m a few words in tlie Symbol, and given to neophytes to be kept by them." De Fide et Symholo, as the Saint himself tells us (7^./r«c^. xyii) was originally a discourse given at a Plenary Council of the African Church, and afterwards put in writing. The theory that Augustme knew of two Symbols, one learned from Ambrose at Milan when he was bapt-'zed, another which he found in possession of the African Church, breaks down completely in face of the fact that it is the Symbol of Milan and of Rome that he expounds to the African ^ishops m synod assembled and irives to his African neophytes. The only prop the critics have for this theory (doubtful or spurious ser- mons are worse than valueless, being them- selves without a prop or in need of one) is too frail to support it. They find the vitam aeter- namm the baptismal interrogatory, as cited by Cyprian. But Cyprian got his Symbol trom Tertulhan, and vitam aeternam is no part of Tertullian's Symbol, which is the Old 133 ■I m ■ i 1 M li 1^ m-\ THE SYMBOL Koman pure and simple. The presence of vitam aeternam in Cyprian's formula does but show that what is obviously implied in " carnis resurrectionem" of the Symbol was from a very early time expressed in the interrogatory. Further Proofs of its Spurious- NESS. III. There is yet more cogent proof that the homily de Symb. ad Catech. is spuriou In the Old Roman Creed, the fourth article runs: "Crucified under Pontius Pilate, and buried." So we find it cited, not only by St. Augustine, bu^ in the works of contemporary and even later writers of the same century, such as St. Maximus of Turin,^ and St. Peter Chrys- ologus.'° Nay, a full hundred years after the time of St. Augustine, and in the Church of Africa, St. Fulgentius knows of no change in the fourth article, but gives it as it stood in St. Augustine's day." On the other hand, the » De Trad. Symb., Horn. 83 (Migne, torn. 57, col. 484). 10 In Symb. Apost, Sermon 57 (Migne, torn. 52, col. 359). « Defens. Symb. contra Arianos (Migne, torn. 65, col. 825). 134 H\ OF THE APOSTLES . • author of the homily de Symb. ad Catech. cites the fourth article just as we have it to- day— « Suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried." The infer- ence is that he either was not of the African Church at all, or, if he was, that the homily was not composed till more than a hundred years after the death of St. Augustine. It may seem a trifling thing to add that the form of address employed by the author of the hoh ily is never once used in a single one of the three hundred and forty sermons to be found among the genuine writings of St. Au- gustine, nor in anv one of the thirty and three more recently u. -/ered and published as his in an appendix to the volume which contains the indtx to his works in Migne's collection." With St. Augustine it is "brethren," "dearly beloved brethren," " dearly beloved," " your charity," « your holiness." Once he has, " sons of light, brothers dearly beloved," and once in the course of a sermon ad infantes, as the neo- phytes were called, we find " my brothers, my " Of course, one naturally looks for it in the opening paragraph. pomug 135 'it THE SYMBOL sons, my daughters, my sisters," but this is not a form of address. The author of the homily, on the other hand, uses " sons " simply. Nor are there wanting other tokens of the spurious character of this homily. The author borrows freely from St. Augustine, copies his style pretty closely, essays to think his thoughts, but these are sometimes beyond him. It is here especially that he betrays the 'prentice hand. He lacks Augustine's mastery of his subject, his mental grasp, his logical exactness, his sense of proportion. To give one instance of the man's deficiency in this last particular, there is in this homily on the Symbol more than a column and a half of a digression on the patience c f Job. Speaking of God's omnip- otence, he s-iys: "Facit quidquid bene vult, quidquid juste vult ; quidquid autem male fit, non vult." Now, this is not exact. It should be: "Facit quidquid vult, et quidquid vult, bene vult, juste vult." The second part of the statement, too, needs to be supplemented by some such words as, " eo tamen bene uti novit." "For [St. Augustine himself it is who says it] as the wicked make an evil use of 136 OF THE APOSTLES. a nature which is good, that is, God's good work, God, being good, makes a good use even of their evil doings, so that His Ahnighty Will is not frustrated in aught." '3 Again the author of the homily says : " Deus non diniit- tit peceata nisi baptizatis." This is worse than inexact; it is untrue, and in open con- tradiction to the teaching of St. Augustine, where he says that not only martyrdom may supply the place of baptism, but also " faith and sincere repentance, if haply time be want- ing to administer the sacrament." '^ Even had he said « Ecclesia " instead of " Deus," his statement would have been true only of what the Church does in the tribunal of penance. An unbaptized person in good faith, who should have only attrition for his sins, would obtain the forgiveness of them by receiving Holy Communion from the hands of the Church. " Serm. 214. " De Bapt. contra Donat, lib. 4, c. 23 (Migne, torn. 43, 137 mmm:^ r*i THE SYMBOL IV. A Paradox AND ITS Elu CIDATION. It is in his treatment of the Divine Omnipotence and its rela- tion to things impossible, that the deficiency of the author of this homily is most marked. In what purports to be an instruction to persons who were novices in the deep things of the Faith, he sets out, the very first thing, with a startling paradox. " God is almighty," he says, "and because He is almighty, He cannot die, He cannot be de- ceived, He cannot lie." This is bad enough, bewildering as it must have been to the cate- chumen. The reason assigned for the puzzling statement is worse : it is trivial, not to say childish. " For," he proceeds to enlighten his hearers, " if He could die. He would not be almighty ; if He could lie, or deceive, or be deceived, or deal unjustly. He would not be almighty ; because if He could do any of these things. He would not be worthy of being almighty." As if the attribute of omnipotence were a gift bestowed upon deserving Deity ! Contrast with this imbecility the masterful wj»y 138 OF THE APOSTLES. ,i*'-l in which St. Augustine grapples with the diffi- cult point in Sermon 214 on the Symbol. He does not begin with a paradox, but feels his way cautiously along, as it were. He points out first that belief in the omnipotence of God implies belief also in there being absolutely nothing in nature which He did not create. After developing this point fully, he goes on, in the next paragraph, to show that, while the wicked do many things against God's will, this does not derogate from His omnipo'ence, nor defeat His purpose in the long run. If He were not able to make the wicked serve His good and just ends. He would not have suffered them to be born or to live ; " whom He did not make wicked, since He made them men ; for, not the sins, which are against nature, but the natures themselves He made. Prescient of the future. He could not, indeed, but know that men were going to be wicked. As He knew, however, the evil they were going to do, 80 He knew the good that He was going to bring out of this evil." He instances the good that God wrought for mankind out of the Vice of Satan, of the Jews, and of the traitor 139 u.}^ THE SYMBOL Judas. Next comes a paragraph in elucidation of the paradox referred to above, which is well worth giving word for word : " But, as I have said that the only thing the Almighty cannot do is what He does not will to do, if any one should be tempted to think me rash in saying that there is anything the Almighty cannot do, let him call to mind that the blessed Apostle says so also. If we believe not, He who contlnneth faithful cannot demj Himself (2 Tim. 2 : 13). But it is \ luse He will not that He cannot; because He even cannot will. For justice cannot will to do what is unjust, nor wisdom will to do what is foolish, nor truth will what is false. From this we gather that there are many other things, besides this that the Apostle speaks of. He cannot deny Himself which the Almighty cannot do. I say it openly, and I am em- boldened by His truth to say that which I dare not gainsay : God Almighty cannot die, cannot change, cannot be deceived, cannot but be blessed, cannot be overcome. Perish the thought that these and the like things could be predicated of Omnipotence ! And so the force of truth constrains us to believe, not only that God w, Almighty, because these things are not true of Him, but that He would not at all be 140 OF THE APOSTLES. almighty, if they were. For, whatever God is He IS as wi mg to be. He is eternal, there- tore, as willing it ; unchangeable, veracious, blessed, and unconquerable, as having a will to .^\. ^^' ,*^'^"' ^® ^«^1^ *>e >^liat He does not will to be. He would not be almighty; but He is almighty ; therefore, what He wills to be He can be. And therefore what He wills not, cannot be, being called, as He is, the Almighty because He can do all that He wills. Of him the psalmist says ; All things whatsoever He (Ps 104 6 r' '^''''^ '"'* ^'"*'''* ""''^ ""'' ^""''^^ This is somewhat subtle reasoning. We shaU be able to follow it more easily if we do but keep clearly in view what the Saint is aiming to show. He assumes as being of faith that God is omnipotent, eternal, veracious, and the rest. He shows, in the first place, that what God cannot do is such that He does not and cannot will to do it ; for God is justice, and justice cannot will to do what is unjust ; God is truth, and truth cannot will what is false. He sets Himself to show, in the second place, that so far as God's not being able to do what He does not will to do from being deroga- 141 THE SYMBOL tory to His omnipotence, that if it were pos- sible for anything to be without His willing it, He would not be omnipotent at all. He points out that God's will is really one with His other attributes, and with His essence. As His will, then, is one with His eternity, with His un- changeableness, with His truth, He must needs will to be eternal, to be unchangeable, to be veracious. Now, t! :• very idea of omnipotence includes the power tc be and do whatever one wills. But, as God must needs will to be eternal, He cannot will to die ; and as He must needs will to be veracious. He cannot will to deceive or to lie. If He oould die, then, or deceive. He would not have the power of baing and doing whatever He willed, and would not, therefore be omnipotent. But He is omnip- otent; therefore, whatsoever He willeth that He is and that He doeth in heaven and on earth. All this may look like a digression from the main topic ; but really it is not. The objec- tion founded on the passage in the homily now shown to be spurious, lay right across the path of the tradition which traces back to the Apos- U2 I f OP THE APOSTLES. ties the origin of the Symbol. The only effective means of getting it out of the way was to blast the homily. And it is something to have cleared the way. It is something to have got from a great authority, who is repre- sented as unfriendly, free leave to follow our quest up to the very gates of Jerusalem and into the full light of the Apostolic Day. V. The Fallacy OF Silence. It may still be said that, at any rate, St. Augustine does not help as in our quest. His silence, too, is taken to indicate that he knows nothing of the tradition of the Apostolic authorship of the Symbol. It is never too safe to argue from the silence of an author. Two of the contemporaries of Augustine, them- selves volmninous writers, just happen to men- tion the tradition once. But their passing allusion to it ranks them amonjj our most im- portant witnesses to its existence. Is it likely that the Jisciple of St. Aml)rose and the friend cf St. Jerome could have been in ignorance of li3 THE SYMBOL a tradition so notable, the existence of which is vouched for in his day by both of them ? About a century after St. Augustine's time, and in the African Church, we find St. Ful- gentius testifying that "the Symbol of the Christian Faith was . . . drawn up by the Apostles in accordance with the rule of the Truth." '5 This famous Bishop of Carthage lived so near the times of St. Augustine, and made so close a study of his works, that he may well be styled his disciple. Again we ask. Is it likely the master was ignorant of the tradition ? There is another reason why it is unsafe to argue from silence, especially in the case of so voluminous a writer as St. Augustine. It is that one can hardly ever be quite sure of the truth of one's premise. Who can say that he has read all the works of St. Augrustine through, and noted what he says or has left unsaid ? Besides, there are two ways in which a writer may witness to a fact ; explicitly, and by implication. Now, St. Augustine certainly " In Defena. Symb. adv. Arianoa. Migne, torn. 65, col. 823. 144 OF THE APOSTLE S. does witness at least in the latter of these two ways to the traditional teaching of the Church about the origin of the Symbol. In his con- troversy with the Donatists, defending the validity of baptism conferred by heretics, he says : "This custom I believe as coming down by tradition from the Apostles. So, there are many things not found in their writings, nor in the canons of Councils of a later date, which, because they are observed by the universal Church, are believed to have derived their origin and received their sanction from no other than the Apostles."'*^ Again: «A custom which the men even of that day, look- mg farther back, did not find to have been established by those who went before them, is rightly believed to have originated with the Apostles." '7 And once more, in the form of a general proposition ; « That which the whole Church holds, and which has not been instituted by Councils, but has been always held fast, we have every reason to regard as the tra- il De Bapt. contra Donat, torn, 9. lib. 2, c. 7. n. 12 (Migne, torn. 43, col. 133). " lb., lib. 4, c. 6, n. 9 (lb., col. 159). »o 145 % THE SYMBOL dition of the Apostles." " But the whole Church held the Baptismal Creed known as the Apostolic Symbol in St. Auj,ustine's day ; it was not instituted by Councils, but had been always held fast ; therefore, according to St. Augustine, we have the very best reason to regard it as having been handed down by tra- dition from the Apostles. VI. An Impor- tant Testi MONY. St. Ausfustine's belief in the Apostolic origin of the Symbol ' is logically and necessarily im- plied in the principle he lays down with re- gard to Apostolic tradition. But we have in the following passage, or I am greatly mis- taken, if not an explicit statement of his belief, at least the very next thing to it. He is com- bating the view that baptism may be given ofEhand to anyone who makes a profession of faith in the Divine Sonship of Christ, such as the eunuch baptized by Philip made (Acts 8 : 35-38). I translate with almost literal ex- actness from the text in Migne : M lb., c. 24 (lb., col. 174). 146 OF THE APOST LES. "That eunuch, they tell us, whom Philip baptized, said no more than, ' T believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God ; ' and, on mak- ing this profession, forthwith received baptism. Are we, then, willing that men, on giving this response only, should incontinently be baptized ? that not one word should be said by the cate- chist, nothing professed by the believer, about the Holy Ghost, the holy Church, the re- mission of sins, the resurrection of the dead, in fine, about the Lord Jesus Christ Himself except that He is the Son of God;— not a word about His incarnation in the Virgin's womb, the passion, the death on the cross, the burial, the resurrection on the third day, the ascension, and the session on the right hand of the Father? For, if the eunuch, when he had made answer, Dogma, Gerarchia e Cullc, p. 326. duction to the Creeds, p. 33 and p. 43. 149 Burn, An Intro- THE SYMBOL Queen Candace," whom PhUip instructed in the Faith ? Was it a formula that contained only the second article of the Symbol j^uown to Augustine ? Nothing of the kind. It was the whole Creed, the whole Symbol— " imo vero cuncta dicere qu o sunt credenda de Christo." Tradition said nothing of what passed between Tl "ap and the eunuch. But the Apostolic oiigm of the Symbol was known « serie traditionis," and from this the inference was an easy one that the eunuch was taught all the truths contained in the Symbol. We claim, therefore, the great Bishop of Hippo as anjother witness to the tradition of the Apos- tolic authorship of the Creed. The Gospel IN A Nut- shell. VII. The Master had charged His Apostles, when he sent them out into all the world, to give bap- tism only to believers: He who believes and is baptized shall be saved. Believes what? The Gospel, of course. The whole Gospel? Yes. In extenso, as we have it in 150 OF THE AP0STLE8 . the New Testament writings ajd in Tradition ? The thing was not to be thought of for one moment. How, then, the whole Gospel ? In a compendious form, in a nutshell— in the Sym- bol, in short, universally known in the; East during the second, third, and fourth centuries as " the Faith," because it was the sum of what candidates for baptism were required to believe and make profession of. Can we con- ceive the Apostles to have been so neglectful of their plain daty as not to have drawn up this Formula ;.f Faith when the Master had charged them to exact a profession of the Faith from every soul who should seek at their hands the boon of regeneration in the waters of bap- tism ? The question of what was to be be- lieved by the candidate for baptism, and in what " form of sound words " this Faith should find expression, pressed for solution from the very first. Therefore the Apostles took no steps to solve and settle it once for all. The school of historical criticism, denying the Apostolic origin of the Symbol, must bear the burden of this incredible consequence. Wo have yet to glance at thn parallel line 16X mm THE SYMBOL o£ tradition in the East before seeking in the New Testament writings for tokens and traces of the existence of the Symbol. What we know of the secrecy observed regarding it will serve to make us content with this. It forbids us at the same time to look for more. 15S OP THE APOSTLES. CHAPTER V. THE SYBfBOL IK THE EAST. The Nicene NO New Creed. L At the close of the first quarter of the fourth century, the three hundred and eighteen Fathers as- sembled at Nice, reaffirmed, in what has ever since been known as the Nicene Creed, "the Faith once for all delivered to the saints." As set forth by the Council, this Creed ends abruptly at the ninth article. " There was question then of Anus, not of Origen," says St Jerome, "of the Son, not of the Holy Ghost. The Fathers affirmed what was denied and passed over in silence what no one called in question.'" So, too, the Anglican Blunt, at page 175 of his Theological Dictionary : coIl47r'"'^'*" " '^'""•' "^' '''"'' ^'"^*' '^'°- ^' 153 1 j 1 I i \ 1 T HE SYMBOL « The Nicene Creed as preserved to us by Euse- bius, breaks off with the words, and in the Holy Ghost, as being aU that was germane matter to the pending controversy ; but, within a few years Epiphanius supplies to us the fuller form as the Creed of the Church of Cyprus, which was reproduced almost verbatim by the Council of Constantinople." Epiphanius, in fact, {Ancoratus, 118) cites the fuller form as the Symbol " prescribed by the three hundred andt«n odd" in the Nicene Council, assiun- ing, certainly not without reason, that the Fathers neither would nor could curtaU the ancient Creed of the Church. It needs not, however, the testimony of Epiphanius or of Rufinus (who attests the agreement of the Eastern with the Western formulary in all but one or two trifling details) to assure us that the Creed of Nice is no new Creed. He who runs may read and see for himself that this is but a second edition, with explanatory notes, of the ancient formulary which St. Leo the Great commends to us as « the Catholic and Apostolic Symbol." Article for article, though not word for word, they are 164 OF THE APOSTLES. one and the same. The later Creed is but an elaborated form of the older and simpler one. The same features, cast in their primitive mould, still look out at us familiarly from their new and more ornate setting. n. Counterpart OP Old Ro- man Symbol. Now, this ancient and simple Creed, twin-sister of the Old Ro- man Symbol, nay, tho very coun- terpart and alter ego of it, exist- ed in the East from the first. The framework of it was the same Trinitarian Formula ; it com- prised twelve articles ; it was a Baptismal Creed as well as a Rule of Faith c -^d test of orthodoxy. St. Athanasius admires the fabric of it, where- in the " so great glory of the Most Holy Trinity is set forth in twelve distinct phrases," and de- clares that to "add to or take away aught from it were a sacrilege.*" Eusebius cites the « De Profess. Reg. CatlioL, ad init. This work, written in Latin aud puiporting to be a translation, is 8«t down as genuine in the edition of the works of St. Athanasius pub- lished at Paris in IT-Jd, and rtpubliaiied at Cologne sixty jrear» later. The citation given above is niade from the 155 THE SYMBOL epistle sent by the Synod of Antioch, in 2C8 A.D., to Pope Dionysius, in which Paul of Sa- later edition. Migne (P. G.) decides against its genuine- ness, and ascrihos it to Idatius. He admits, however, that in all the MSS., and in all the editions of the work (LibriS. Athanas. de Trinit. , of which De Profess. Reg. Cath. is the seventh) it is ascribed to Athanasius ; and the MSS. date from the twelfth century. Migne (P. L.) seeks to show that "Idatius" does but hide tie identity of the real author, whom he makes out to be Vigilius of Thapsus, an African by birth, who flourished in the latter half of the fifth century. Driven from his see by the Arian Vandals, he took up his abode in Constanti- nople for a season, and there wrote a book against Euty- ches. Cf. Migne, P. L., torn. 62, cols. 94 and 493. The work from which the citation is given above is in the form of a dialogue between Athanasius and an Arian heretic. Well may the author, whoever he be, speak of the Baptis- mal Creed as " setting forth the so great glory of the Most Holy Trinity in twelve distinct phrases." The Council of Nice framed no new Creed, nor did it, as we have seen, set forth all the articles of the old and unwritten Creed of the Catholic Church. This was from the first and continued to be, in the words of Leo the Great, duodecim apostolorum totidem signata aententiis — recognizable as Apostolic by its having the Apostolic number of articles. The Fathers of Nice did but declare more clearly and fully the mean- ing of the ancient Creed by way of safeguarding "the Faith once for all delivered to the saints." " And any- how," are the words of St. Athanasius (De Synod, n. 43 ; Migne, P. G., torn. 20), " the three hundred did not set down in writing ai "thing newly invented." Hence, despite the fact that the Human Church still clung to her ancient 156 OF THE APOSTLES. mosata is condemned as having « departed from the Rule of Faith and embraced a spurious doc- trine The miplication is that the Rule of i^aith was the same in the East as in the West «ie same at Antioch as at Rome. But thj Roman Church never knew of any Rule of i^aith, never recognized any Rule of Faith, other than the Apostolic Symbol. The pro' f ession of Faith presented by Arius and Euzoius to Constantine, some sixty years later, is still the ancient Symbol of the Church, with the seventh and eleventh articles left out, the second expanded somewhat, and the tenth thrown into the last place, as we find it also in a sermon (215) attributed to St. Augustine. Hk ^f ^«\^J°^^g:^ty, (2) and in Jesus Christ His Son, who was born of Him before all a^es • God the Word, by whom were made all tKs m heaven and earth ; who descended, (3) aifd 167 THE SYMBOL was made man ; (4) who suffered, (5) and rose again, (6) and ascended into heaven ; (8) and is to come again to judge the living and the dead, (9) and in the Holy Ghost, (12) the resur- rection of the flesh, and in the hfe of the world to come and in the kingdom of heaven ; (10) and in the one Catholic Church of ^od, which extends from end to end of the earth. ' Further evidence of the existence in the East, long before the time of the Nicene Coun- cil, of a Baptismal Creed held to be of Apos- tolic origin, is to be found in the Didascalia, whence Zahn has conjecturally restored it. The Didascalia, as Burn observes, was written in the third century, probably not far from Antioch. It attributes to the Twelve the com- position of the Creed. " There is no trace here of Western influence," writes Burn, after citing a passage from it, « Yet we find a Trin- itarian Creed traced back to an Apostohc Coun- cil." {An Introduction to the Creeds : Ap- pendix F.). * Socrat. Hist, 1. 1, c. 26 ; Sozom. HUt, I. 2, o. 2T. 158 OF THE APOSTLES. in. In the writings of St. Basil we i Testimony op have abundant evidence of the L?.".?^^!^;. existence in the East, from the very earliest times, of this primitive Ante- Nicene Creed. At the outset of his work against Eunomius, he says that if all upon whom the name of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ was invoked " had been content with the tradition of the Apostles and simplicity of the Faith, there would have been no need at this time of our discourse." s He cites Euno- mius as saying ; "The more simple and common Faith of all who wish to appear or to be Christians, to state It m a condensed and compendious form, 18 as follows : We believe in one God the Father Almighty, from whom are aU things ; and in one only-begotten Son of God, God the Word, our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things and m one Holy Ghost, the Paraclete." Eunomius here gives us expressly to under- stand that he is presenting but "a summary » Adv. Eunom., 1. 1, n. 4. 159 THE SYMBOL and compendium" of the primitive Creed. Plainly it was a Baptismal Creed, based upon the same Trinitarian Formula as the Old Ro- man Symbol. He appeals to it as « that pious tradition which prevailed from the first amongst the fathers as a kind of gnomon or rule.' St. Basil says that Arius " presented this same profession of Faith to Alexander, deceiving him." He does not deny, he freely admits rather, that it was the ancient Creed of the Church ; but he complains that the Arians put their own interpretation on it. " And having," he says, "set down the profession of Faith, he at once passes on to his interpretations ; for this reason among others, that the profession in question is not enough to do away with the charges under which he lies. . . • TeU me, this pious tradition of the Fathers, and, as you yourself have termed it, this rule and gnomon and safe criterion, is it now, on the contrary, proclaimed to be an instrument ot deceit and a means of deceiving? " ' Elsewhere, 6 lb n 5 " For the Old Roman Creed, as any one may easily convince himself, is neutral with regard to the op position between orthodoxy and Arianism. An Anan can *^ 160 OF THE APOSTLES. dealing with its use as a Baptismal Creed, he says ; "Shall I, then, give over that tradition which brought me to the light, which gave'me the knowledge of God, by which I became a child of God? . . . Nay, rather do I pray that it may be my good fortune to go hence to the Lord with this Confession {o.noAoria?^ ^^ lips." ' Of this Baptismal Creed he says later on(c. 27; n. 65), "The very Confession of Faith m Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, from what written records have we it ? " Now, the" Creed of the Council was a written Creed/ Creed of Jerusalem. IV. This same Confession of Faith, which he calls "the Faith" simply, St. Cyril of Jerusalem, a contemporary of St. Basil, presents to us perfectly well recite it, for he does not deny that Christ is the only Son of God, but, on the contrary, maiut.-un. it toge ^rwitlialltheotherstatements which are combined m t. reed. '-The Apostles' Creed, by Dr. A.lolf Harnaok (tranv^ted from the Oernum for Tlie Nineteenth Century, July, 1893, by Mrs. Humphry Ward). J Liber de Spintu Sancto, o. 9 ; n. 26 (Migne, P. O.. torn. n 161 -/I TH E SYMBOL in his discourses to catechumens. "The Faith " was not written by Cyril ; it is not to be found, as Migne notes, in any of the MSS. of his works ; he forbore putting it in writing, as did St. Augustine, conformably to the Dis- ciphne of the Secret. Still, it may be recon- structed from his writings, as it has been from those of St. Augustine. Migne (i e., a writer cited by that editor) has picked out of his ser- mons and pieced together the Symbol of the Mother Church of Jerusalem, which is set forth in the following table, side by side with the Old Roman Symbol : Old Roman Symbol. (1)1 believe in God the Father Almighty ; (3) And in Christ Jesus, His Only Son, our Lord ; (3) Born of the Holy Ghost and the Virgin Mary; Symbol of Jerusalem. (1) We believe in one God the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisi- ble; (2) And in one Lord Jesus Christ, only-begotten Son of God, born true God of the Father, before all ages; by whom all things were made ; (3) Who came in the flesh, and was made man of the Holy Virgin and the Holy Ghost [Catech. 4a ; n. 9] ; 16a OF THE APOSTLES. Old Roman Symbol. (4) Crucified under Pon- tius Pilate and buried, (5) Rose again the third day from the dead, (6) Ascended into heav- en. (7) Sitteth at the i !?ht hand of the Father, (8) Whence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. (9) And in the Holv Ghost ; (10) The Holy Church, (11) The remission of sins; (12) The resurrection of the flesh. Symbol of Jerusalem. (4) Crucified und buried, (5) Rose again the third day; (6) And ascended into heaven. (7) And sitteth at the right hand of the Father, (8) And is to come in glory to judge the quick and dead ; of whose kingdom there shall be no end. (0) And in one Holy Ghost, the Paraclete, who spoke by the prophets ; (10) And in one holy Cath- olic Church ; (11) And in one baptism of penance for the remission of sins ; (12) And in the resurrec- tion of the flesh, and the life everlasting. Here, then, we have fhe Baptismal Creed of the Mother Church of Jerusalem. Immedi- ately on finishing his exposition of it, St. Cyril says to his catechumens ; « We have discoursed upon the holy and Apostolic Faith (Symbol) that has been delivered to yoi, and that you 163 THE SYMBOL are to make profession of." ' The fact that this Symbol was in use in the Church of Jeru- salem in the fourth century serves to dissipate the doubt raised by Harnack, where he says : « But if the Cesarean symbol is not one framed for a particular community, then we know abso- lutely nothing of any definite, detailed, ancient communal symbols in the East of any date preceding the Nicene Creed." ' For here is a definite, detailed, ancient Eastern Symbol,^ "communal, such as the Roman," for the Church of Jerusalem formed the nucleus of a great religious community in the East, as the Church of Rome did in the West ; and demon- strably older than the Nicene Creed. It be- speaks an earUer stage of development than that Creed, as any one may see who wiU be at the pains to compare the two ; it wants sev- eral of the additions made at Nice, notably the * 6!u>o^io. roT ^arpf ; it is the simpler formulary, and therefore the older. Besides, how comes it to have been still the Baptismal Creed of 8 Cat. 17 : 33. ^ u i.u 9 The Aposllea' Creed (translated from the German by the Rev. Stewart Means), p. 43. 164 ':■! gation of the N.cene decrees, but that it already was in possession there time out of mind, and so could claim exemption, even as did the Old Koman Creed, on the score of its Apostolic A SiSTEP'S DACGHTEFf. V. ^ But what is the relationship of St. Cyril's Creed to the Old Ro- man Symbol? Harnack finds It to be "so close that Cyril's Symbol can o!;y» ' '^'^'''?^''' «r the sister of the Roman one. The sister it cannot well be : it bears about It the tokens of too ripe a growth for that Therefore, Harnack concludes that it must be the daughter. Unfortunately for this conclusion, his disjunctive is not complete, tyril s Symbol may stand in the relation of a sister s daughter to the Roman one. And this, as will now be shown, is just the relationship. Harnack s guess as to the Roman origin of St. ^yril s Creed rests on the assumption that there " lb., p. 47. 165 , %,itri! 11 TH E SYMBOL was no Baptismal Creed in the East before the Council of Nice promulgated its Creed— an assumption that has not the faintest shadow of warrant in fact. As well might he maintain that the Mother Church of Jerusalem got her Faith and Baptism from Rome as that she got her Symbol thence. And here let me say, with all the deference that is due to Harnack's un- doubted scholarship, that when he commits himself to the statement that " there was no established baptismal confession of faith in the East in the third century," he does but declare his own unfitness to give expert testimony on the question that is under discussion. Ihere never yet has been a Church within the pale of Christ's world-wide Kingdom but has had some fixed Baptismal Confession of Faith. " The Faith " in which St. Cyril baptized his cate- chumens, was not, he tells them expressly, the Faith of the East alone, or of the West alone but of the Catholic Church-the Church of all acres and of all lands, the same in Jerusalem as in Rome, the same in the first century as m the fourth. "The Catholic Church, he says, "teaches you in the Confession of Faith to 1G6 OF THE APOSTLES. believe in one Holy Spirit." " But since " bap- tism bestows the Rule of Truth," or Confession of Faith, which Irenaeus tells us it did even in the second century, then as surely as there was baptism in the East before the Council of Nice, so surely was there in the East a fixed Bap- tismal Creed. VI. Creed of Marcellus. Stripped of its additions (all of them of a strongly marked Eastern character), CyriFs Creed is the primitive Creed of the Church; the ancient Confession in which Athanasius (or is it Vigilius ?) finds the " so great glory of the Most Holy Trinity set forth in twelve dis- tinct phrases ; " the " gnomon and rule and safe criterion," based upon the Baptismal Formula, to which Eunomius and the otlier Arians of his day appeal as to " the common Faith of all who wish to appear or to be Christians ; " the Creed, in fine, which Marcellus of Ancyra brought with him from the East and presented » Catech. 17, n. 8. 1C7 THE SYMBOL to Pope Julius, some time between 337 and 341 A.D., as the Confession learned "from my [his] forefathers in God." It is true that Marcellus says he learned it also from the Scriptures; but so say many of the Fathers, among them some who say in the same breath that it was composed by the Apostles." They mean, of course, as Marcellus meant, that they found in the Scriptures every truth set forth in the Creed. There is one thing, however, that Marcellus does not say : he does not say that he learned his Creed in Rome. And yet the critics, in the very teeth of what he does say, namely, that he got his Creed from his " forefathers in God " (who were not Romans), tell us that the Creed of Marcellus is the Old Roman Creed. In this the critics are true to their method, but false to fact, or rather what they take to be the fact. It the Ohl Roman Creed was drawn up at Rome some time be- tween 100 and 150 A.D., as certain of tlie critics beUeve, then the Creed of Marcellus is « Cf. rassinnus. Tie Incarnat. 1. 6. c. 3 (Migiie. P. L., torn. 50) ; St. Cyril, Catech. 5 ; 12 ooiniMired with Caiech. 17 ; 32. 108 OF THE APOSTLES . emphatically not the Old Roman Creed If, on the other hand, the Old Roman Creed is what Hilary and Ambrose and Jerome and Leo and Rufinus say it is— the Symbol of Faith composed by the Twelve before their separation, the Creed of Mjircellus, with " Father " added to its first article, .and "life everlasting " dropped from the twelfth, is the Old Roman or Apostles' Creed. The fatal mistake made by the critics in deahng with the Creed of Marcellus is to have judged of it by the later polemical formularies whijh sprang up like mushrooms in the East after the rise of the Arian heresy. '^ The Creed of Marcellus is older than any of these for- mularies, is not a polemical Creed, and was not a written Creed till he put it in writing for the first time. Marcellus himself was one " *' Sprang up like mushrooms " is a strong exprossion, but wiJl hardly apjH'ar exaggerated ia view of what St.' Hilary, a <;ontemj»oiarv witness, tells us in .4(7 ConHtan- tium. '• For we bear witness one to another," he writes, "how that, ever since th-> Synod was convened at Nice' t^.ere.s nothing but creed- writing. . . . Yearly and monthly Creeds (faiths) are issued, those issued set aside, those set aside defended, the defenders anathematized, . . ." (lb lib. 2, n. 5.) ^ '* 169 ' !r-| TH E SYMBOL of the three hundred and eighteen Fathers who gave to the world the Nicene Symbol, and was distinguished at the Council for his cham- pionship of the Orthodox Faith. The Creed that he got from his " forefathers a God existed in the East, therefore, lon<: before Anus was born. Testimony of St. Hilaky. VII. Let me cite, in further proof of this, one or two passages from the writings of so competent a witness as St. Hilary, Bishop of Poitiers Hilary knew the East thoroughly m the first half of the fourth century, havmg striven earnestly there with the Arians, on their own ground, for " the Faith once dehvered to the Saints " An exile in the East, he writes to the Emperor Constantius. Here is the context of the passage just given in the footnote : " Recognize, excellent and most pious Em- peror, the Creed which you formerly desued to hear from the (Arian) Bishops, and did not. Fo when it was sought from them, they wrote out their own creeds, and taught not the things 170 OF THE APOSTLES. of God. They have carried their error round the everlasting globe, and with it a strife that ever returns upon itself. Man in his feeble- ness ought to have been modest, and to have kept the sacrament (mystery, symbol) of the knowledge of God in his conscience within those terms wherein he (first) made an act of taith. It behooved him not, after confessing under oath m baptism the Faith in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Moly(jrho.^t, to doubt aught, or innovate aught. iiut through presumption, or complaisance, or error, some have deceitfully confessed the unchangeable ordinance '-^ of the Apostolic doctrme ; others have boldly gone beyond it ; while the true, natural meaning of the Con- fession in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost is evaded, lest that meaning should remain which ought to be confessed in the sacrament of re- generation. . . . lb., n. 4. "A Creed, then, is sought, as if there were no Creed. The Creed must be written, as if It were not in the heart. Born again by faHh now we are taught unto Faith, as 'if tiiat second birth were without Faith. We learn Christ after baptism, as if there could bo any baptism witliout tlie Faith of Christ. . ^* " Constitutionera or " symbol." may properly lio rendered -'rulo" in THE SYMBOL As it is the safest course for those who sail the stormy sea in winter, when shipwreck threatens, to return to the port whence they set sail ; and as it behooves inexperienced young men, who have gone beyond the bounds observed by then, father, and, in keeping up the ?iome, have spent their patrimony with too F«digal a hand, nL, for fear of losing their all, to go ^ack Jo the way of their father, as the needful and only safe way ; so, amid such shipwreck of the Faith as we see around us, when the heritage of our heavenly patrimony is " J^^" dered, the safest course for us is to hold last the first and only Evangelical Creed, learned and confessed in ba.v :sm. . .. . Jhi^ ^ ^^^^«, so believed in the iiolv Spirit that I cannot now be taught any Falin beyond it concernmg ?hTLord Jesus Christ : not thei^by dissenting from the Faith of the Fathers (Nicene Creed), but following the Symbol of my second birth, and the knowledge of evangelical doctnne ^vhich are in no wise at variance with that (Creed)."— Z^-, n. 6-11. Thus does Hilary, writing to Constantius take for granted, as something known to all the existence, in the East, too, of a Baptisma Creed based upon the Trinitarian Formula; ot a Creed which antedated all written Creeds, ui- OF THE APOSTLES. eluding the Nicene. He caUs it " the first and only Evangelical Creed, learned and confessed m baptism," the " Apostohc Faith " (n. 6), i. e. Symbol, and sets forth as its content (n' 11)* approved also by Scripture, as many as seven articles of the Old Roman Creed. In short he makes it plain that he is referring to what has been ever known in the Church as the Symbol of the Apostles. He counsels to Christians in the East, under the Emperor Constantius, a return to this the Creed of their baptism. Perhaps those who sav that " there was no established baptismal confession of faith in the East in the tliird century," will tell us how there can be a return to that which never existed. •jl.. vin. Upheld by St. Hilary, and .The t^xwrit- borne, as it were, ujjon his shoul- ..'":!:.^'^.. dors, we can see far into the third century, and descry in the East the ol)ject of our quest— a counterpart and olfrr i'ijo of the 01(1 Roman Symbol But there is i'i'-i TH E SYMBOL yet another passage in the writings of St. Hilary which must be cited. It is found in the Liber de Synodls sen de Fide Orien^ talmm AVe learn from It that while the Creed was never written in the West m Hilary's time, polemical formularies, written Creeds based upon the Symbol, began to be published in the East owing to the spread ot heresy. He is addressing his brother Bishops in Germany and other parts of the West : "But blessed are ye in the Lord and full of fflory, who hold fast, in the confession ot the fonsc ence, the perfect and Apostolic Creed, and Tyet know nothing of written creeds. For you stand not in need of the letter, abound- fnJ L you do in the spirit. Nor do you want the help of a hand to write what you believe ^ h tt heart, and confess with the lips unto salvation. iNeither was it needful for you to read out to a bishop what you held (in memory when you stood at the baptismal font. But necessity has introduced the custom of settmg forth creeds in writing and «^^^«f ^b"ig to hem For where the inmost sentiment of the mind is in question, there the letter is required. And certainly there is no bar to the writing of tl at which it is salutary to confess, —lb., n. b^. 174 :'*■.■; OF THE APOSTLES. Later on, however (n. 84), he deems it need- ful to offer this justification of his having re- produced in writing the Nicene Creed : " And the Symbol itself which was at that time piously put in writing, it will not be impious in us to have inserted in this our work." From these passages we gather that the Baptismal Creed, which Hilary plainly implies to have been the same in the East as in the West, and which he speaks of as an " un- changeable ordinance," or " rule " of Apostolic doctrine, was not at all a written Creed, and is not to be confounded with any of the numer- ous polemical confessions called forth by the Arian controversy. These, indeed, were built on the foundation of the unwritten Creed, but 80 fashioned as the exigencies of each case re- quired. Hence we find the second article, about which the main controversy raged, to be abnormally developed in most of these formu- laries, while the third is often rudimentary. '^ To Hilary it appeared as if, amid this multiplic- « Writers on this subject usually refer to the ninth article with those that follow as the "third" because it introduces the last of the threw nv.in divisions of the Symbol. THE SYMBOL ity of creeds, Faith in the East had parted from her old moorings, and, tossed about on an angry sea of controversy, could escape ship- wreck only by a return to the safe anchorage of her ancient Symbol. Origen's "Plain Rule." IX. We have traced this Symbol in the East, through Basil, Hilary, and Marcellus, back to the third century. Both Hilary and Marcellus first saw the hght towards the close of that century, and " the forefathers in God," from whom the latter got the Symbol, belong to an earUer period. Among them we may reckon Origen and Clement of Alexandria. Here are the^elements of what Origen calls " the sure outline and plain rule of Apostolic teaching," as given in Of Bey innings, bli. 1, n. 4. (V) ''There is oh€ Gorl who created and ordered all thing>^ " , (2) ' this God . . • sent our L<.rd 3e^i^ Clirist." C-^ r' who . . . took a body, . . . boin of the Virgin and thr Hob Ghost " ; ( t) ' 'dfeixd truly, . . • truly died " ; (r)) '' truly rose from the dead ; 170 OF THE APOSTLES. (6) "and after His resurrection . . . was taken up." (9) "Then . . . they have handed down (the behef in) the Holy Ghost." (12) " After this, that the soul, . . . when it quits this world, will be dealt with accord- ing to its deserts ; will possess the heritage of eternal life, or be banished into everlasting fire ; . . . but also that a time will come when the dead shall rise asrain." '^ The numerals point to the corresponding articles of the Old Roman Creed. It will be noticed that mention is made of the Holy Ghost in the article on the Virgin Birth — an uncommon thing in the written creeds of the century that followed. Who can doubt that we have here the Apostolic Symbol, so far as the Discipline of the Secret admitted of its be- ing given in writing ? Origen tells us that it was " handed down from the Apostles through successive generations," and that " that alone is to be received as true which in no wise dis- agrees with the ecclesiastical and Apostolic Tradition."— /&., n. 2. li w Mlgne, P. G., torn, 11. l!l i?-; MIC«OCO«»Y RESOLUTION TEST CHART (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No. 2) 1^ ■ 2.8 l£ ■ u y. Li Li ■ 3.6 tli IIS 1h u 1 2.5 2.0 1.8 J§ jd APPLIED IIVMGE Inc 1653 East Main Street Rocheiter, Ne» York 14609 USA (716) 482 - 0300 - Phone (716) 2B8 - 5989 - Fo» THE SYMBOL X. Symbol of Alexandria. About the middle of the third century, shortly before the death of Origen, Dionysius of Alex- andria, writing to Dionysius of Rome, who afterwards became Pope, tells him that No- vatian has strayed so far from the truth as to " overturn the Confession of Faith (-:''■ '^ ««« d/ioXnytav) which preccdcs baptism." '^ Here is further evidence, not inferential, but direct and categorical, of the existence in the East, in the third century, of what Harnack has so egregiously failed to find there, " an established baptismal confession of Faith." Dionysius makes no manner of doubt that his Roman namesake will know what truths are embodied in the Baptismal Creed which he does but mention merely ; the same Faith and the same Baptism would involve the use of the same Symbol within the pale of the same Catholic and Apostolic Church. It is thio Symbol of the Church of Alexandria that Origen sum- marizes for us in the passage cited above. He " Hwt., bk. 7, ch. 8. 178 OF THE APOSTLES. got it when a boy from St. Clement, Bishop of that Church; for Eusebius tells us that Origen attended the catechetical instruction given by St. Clement.'^ We can picture to ourselves tlie precocious boy eagerly drinking in those words of the venerable old Bishop who had "been worthy to hear" men who "preserved the true tradition of the blessed doctrine, directly from Peter, and James, and John, and Paul, the holy Apostles, having re- ceived it in succession, the son from the father, though few resemble their fathers." " « Follow God," St. Clement exhorted his hearers, . . holding fast what is thine, what is good, what cannot be taken from thee, the Faith in God, the Confession in Him who suffered." - This he calls « a most precious possession," and well he may, for it is no other than that pearl of great price, the Symbol of the Apostles, which sums up in twelve arti- " lb., ch. 6. 19 Stromata. bk. 1. » Tt/v f/f rov fteov niariv, rr)v fJc rov rraftovra 6/tn?.ny',nv," Ptted. 1. 3 : c. 3. •' Eusebius and the Nirione Council." the obser- vant Pearson notes (vol. 3, p. 14) "have naUovra only in their Creeds." 179 n T HE SYMBOL culate words " the Faith once for all deUvered to the saints." In a later chapter (1. 6, c. 10.) he defines it for us as "the knowledge, in a brief and compendious form, of those things that are necessary to be known." \i M 11 ft! Justin and Ignatius. u XL Of this same Symbol we find clear traces — more we may not look for— in the writings of Justin and Ignatius, the disciple of St. John. " As many as are persuaded and believe, writes the former, " that the things we teach and declare are true, and give assurance that they are able to live accordingly, ... are then led by us where there is water, and are regenerated after the manner of regeneration whereby we also are regenerated." " The ref- erence to the catechetical instruction and pro- fession of faith which precede baptism is ex- plicit, and the renunciation of Satan, his works, and his pomps, is clearly imphed. St. « Apol. 1, n. 61 (Migne. P. O., torn. 6). Cf. also lb., nn. 21, 42, 46 ; Dial. 15, 133. 180 S:l OF THE APOSTLES. Justin adds that " they are then washed in that water, in the name of God, the Father and Lord of all things, and of our Saviour Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Ghost ; " and later on varies the mention of the Second Person, say- mg « ia the name of Jesus Christ crucified under Pontius PUate," where the addition '' under Jrontius Pilate " carries the mind back to the profession of faith in the words of the Symbol, which preceded baptism. He had already (n. 31) given, from the proplietical books of the Old Testament, a summary of what critics call " christological attributes," which plain people are familiar with as that part of the Creed that concerns the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity. In St. Ignatius' Ad TralUanos the early use of the Symbol in its recommendatory character, as a test of Church meml .nip, is not ob- scurely hinted at. The passage runs (the numbers once more refer to the articles of the Old Roman Creed) : "Close, then, your ears to any one who speaks to you apart from (2) Jesus Christ, who was of the race of David j (3) who was of 181 m II mHi I ! I 1! !l n T HE SYMBOL Mary, who was truly born, ate and drank ; {4) truly suffered persecution under Pontius Pilat was truly crucified and died, in the sight ot those who are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth ; (5) who also truly arose again from the dead, His Father having raised Him ; (12) as His Father will raise in Jesus Christ, with- out whom we have no true life, after the like- ness of Him, us also who in Him believe."— lo., c. 9. Cf. also Ad Smyr., c. 1, where with other elements of the Symbol, '' one body of His Church," is included. XII. It may be well, before going further, to cast a side-glance at the futile attempt of Katten- busch and Harnack to free thtir theory from straits. The difficulty which they had to find some way out of was this. If the Symbol originated in Rome in the second century, how came it to be the Baptismal Creed of the Eastern Church in the fourth? AVhen and where did it gain official entrance into the East? The failure of the two German writers to answer this question satisfactorily is con- 183 A Side- glance. ; ! OF THE APOSTLES. spicuous and complete. Both of them seem to regard "the period of struggles with Paul of Samosata"" as a likely one for their attempt at smug( 'ing the Old Roman Creed into the Orient. But we have given chapter and verse ot Eusebius to show that, during this very period, the East had its Rule of Faith, and that the Church of Alexandria was in peaceful pos- session of her Baptismal Creed some years be- fore the heresiarch of Samosata was deposed from the See of Antioch. We say " some years," so as to be strictly within the letter of our historical warrant. Now, Dionysius of Alexandria, Origen, and Clement got their Symbol or Baptismal Creed in the East, where they were " born again " unto God in baptism. For baptism, as Ire- naeus tells us, " bestows the Rule of Truth," which is no other than the Baptismal Creed. This 18 "the true tradition of the blessed doctrine " which came down from the Apostles tlie son receiving it from his f ither in God and And as all succession in Christ from son had its source in the East, it fol- I Apostles' Creed, p, 49. 183 father I THE SYMBOL lows that the Baptismal Creed, handed down in the direct Une of that succession, had in the East its origin. Baptized in the East within about a half century of the passing of St. John, IrenjBUs got the Creed there with his baptism. He brought it with him to the West, too, whither it had been brought long before his day. And he assures us that the Church of the second century, various as were the languages in which she spoke, professed her Baptismal Faith, wherever in all the world she begot children to God, in terms of one and the same Apostolic Rule of Truth. XIII. " Handed Down from TUE Apos- tles." The Church in the East, from the fifth century upward, witnes- ses, with the Church in the West, to the Apostolic authorship of the Symbol. Some of the Eastern Fathers give no more than an implicit declaration of their mind in the matter, as St. John Chrysostom, when he says : " Hence it is plain that they (the Apostles) did not deliver everything m 184 25 OF THE APOSTLES. writing, but much also without writing; and this too IS worthy of belief. Wherefore, we account also the tradition of the Church worthy of belief. It is the tradition : seek ^H>thing further." ^3 We have also explicit tes- fT^ni • J«*»"C^««'-n^diseiple and deacon ot fet. Chrysostom, bears witness that the Sym- bol was put together by the Apostles of the laith writes St. Athanasius to Serapion, « as It has been handed down to us by the Fathers." ^s In his L.ber de Splntn Sancto c. 27 (Migne P. G. torn 32), St. Basil enumerates the " Con- fess,on ^ of Faith in Father, Son, and Holy Wiost, among « tlie teachings transmitted in a secret manner from the tradition of the Ap- ostles. " May we, to the last breath of life " write St. Gregory Nazianzen, "confess with great confidence that excellent Depocit of the holy fathers who were nearest to Christ: that Confessioi; of the primitive Faith which has been familiar to us from childhood, which il%'" ^^- ' "' '''^^^«^' - ^-Ho-. IV(Mi,ne, P. G.. ** De Incar. Christi, 1. 6, c 3 « Ep. ad Serap., n. 33 (Migne. P G.. torn. 26) 185 ;i:« TH E SYMBOL we first uttered and with which may wr de- part this Wie, bearing godUness with us hence, this, if nothing else." ^' Again he refers to the Symbol as " that excellent Deposit which we received from our fathers ; adoring the Father, and the Son, and aie Holy Ghost . . . in whose name we have been cleansed in the waters of b.ptism." ^^ St. Epiphanius testii.es that the Church " received the Faith (Symbol) as a sacred trust from the Apostles ; " and, having cited the xNicene Symbol, with the ad- dition" 01 the articles omitted by the Council adds : " This Formula of Faith was handed down to us from the holy Apostles, and pres- cribed in the holy city by all the Bishops, m number, three hundred and eighteen." ^» Here Epiphanius speaks by the book, for the Fathers of Nice did not draw up the Symbol— that was the work of the Apostles. They did ^ut de- r,)v Kali/v napaKaradr/Krjv r,:,r ayluv ^a^ipi^v, r^v iyyvrlpu xpi'^rov, ml rfK rpLrm nic "> ccvrpo.vralov cvvanfl^o^v rcvro, a,v n a>M evdrev&tv ano^ep6nEvm ryv evcipeiav.-Orat 11, alias o (Migne, P. G., torn. 35, col. 832). 2T Orat, 6, n. 22 (Miprne, P. «., torn. 3o.) « Ancoratus, 118 (Migne, P. G., torn. 43). 186 i,|;|l OF THE AF --TL^S. fine the meaning of it more clearly, and re- affirm, with all the authority vested in them, the truths which it embodied. Finally, the' two hundred Bishops assembled at Ephesus in 431, in their IMation to the Emperor Theodosius, speak of "the Faith {I e. Sym- bol), o/iginally delivered (to the Church) by the Apostles, and afterwards expounded by the three hundred and eighteen Fathers in the metiopolitan city of Nice." ^^ The testimony of Irenaeus to the existence in the East as well as in the West, in his day, of a Baptismal Creed and Rule of Truth hanJed down from the Apostles, has been cited in a preceding article. At the fourth General Council of Chalce- don (A. D. 451), the Letter ot Pope Leo the Great to FlaA^ian, Patriarch of Constantinople, was read to the assembled prelates. In this' letter the Roman Symbol is cited in sections word for word, and commended as the comr-on Confession of all the baptized on earth. (C/., above, Chap. II. Sect. 1). Directly after the reading of the letter, the Greek Bishops at the " Bollandist's Acta Sanctorum, 15 Julii. 187 THE SYMBOL Council exclaimed : " This is the Faith of the Fathers. This is the Faith of the Apostles." '° " Even more than this was done at the TruUan Council, the so-called Concilinm quinisex- tiwn;' says Zahn.^' "The fathers of this coun'jil in their first canon confess * that which was delivered by the eye-witnesses and ser- vants of the Word, the Apostles of the Church chosen by God.' They then acknowledge the faith more exactly determined by the 318 fathers of Nicaea against Arius, as well as the five (Ecumenical Councils which followed. We can only understand by this that the Greeks wished to point to that confession which was in use among them as a baptismal confession before, and for a considerable time after, the Council of Nicaea, ag an inheritance from the times of the Apostles, even as a work of the Apostles." »o Hefele, Conzilien ii. 440 ff., 453 f., 547. 81 T/ie Articles of the Apostles' Creed, pp. 220, 231. 188 * OF THE APOSTLES. A Belated Witness. XIV. At page 4 of a now oft-cited work, Huriiaek tells his readers that "the Eastern Church has at no time traced any creed to an Apostolic origin, or designated any as Apostolic in ,ie strict sense of tiie word." The evidence that has now been brought forward in disproof will make it needful for Harnack to buttress his as- sertion with some more substantial prop than «ie declaration of . Greek Archbishop at Florence some fourteen hundred years after 1 aul preached the risen Christ to the men of Athens. Harnack's authority is cited in a footnote, as follows : " Cf. the testimony of Archbishop Marcus Eugenicus at the Council of Florence '^' }^f' "^f ^'"^^^ ^^ Sylvester Sguropolis,' Hist. Concil. Florent., sect. 6, c. 6, p 150 edit. Rob. Creyghton, 1660." The testimony of a fifteenth century witness, is accepted ; the testimony of fourth century witnesses, of Ba- sil, and Gregory, and Epiphanius, is ignored, ^reat is historical criticism, and great are its prerogatives. 189 THE SYMBOL We have traced the Symbol back to tho ApostoHc Age, following our quest in the East as in the West, along a trail of light, m the path of the ancient tradition. It remains to point out vestiges of it in the New Testament and decipher the allusions to it which are to be found in that inspired record. 290 0^;_THE APOSTLES. CHAPTER VI. THE SYMBOL IN THE SECOND CENTURY. I. It may be well, at this stage, i a Fumsy to take some notice of Profes- •• '^^^^»^- sor McGiffert's theory of the origin of the Symbol. On his hypothesis, the Church might still have been without her Creed had not Marcion, driven from Pontus, sought an asylum m Rome, some time after the middle of the second century, and there set himself to teach a form of heresy, which was not, however, ori- ginal with him.' McGiffert maintains that the Symbol was drawn up to meet the errors of Marcion. The work in which he essays to make good L.m contention ' shows him to be a » Cf. IrensBus. Adv. Haer, bk. 8. c. 4, n 8 ru , ^^*'^' ^''^^' by Arthur Cushman McGiffert • Charles Scribuer's Sons, 1002. '«'*^an jucuitfert : 191 TH E SYMBOL man of well-trained mind, a man who has learned to think for himself. He does not take his data at second hand, nor does he let others draw the conclusions for him. It must in fairness be granted that Pro- fessor McGiffert pleads his case with not a little skill. But, given a bad case, the clever- est of pleaders can do no more than make it plausible : he cannot make it good. The theory that the Symbol was framed to head off the heresy of Marcion, however much labor and skill may be employed in setting it up, is but a house of cards, which '. very slight putt of wind would blow down. A gust or two from North Africa will sweep it clean into the Adriatic. II. In De Praescript. 36,Tertul- lian testifies that the Roman Church got her Symbol from the Apostles Peter and Paul, and afterwards gave it to proconsular Africa (cum Africanis cmoque ecdesiis conteaserarit) He proceeds, in the very n€:.t paragraph (37), to confute, 192 Demolished BY Teetullian. OF THE APOSTLES. after his own strenuous fashion, the heretics 01 his day : If these things be so, that the truth may be adjudged to us as many as walk according to that Rule which the Church has handed down from the Apostles, the Apostles from Christ, Christ from God, the reasonableness of ou^ position IS plain, that heretics are not to be allowed to appeal to the Scriptures, seeing that we prove them without the Scriptures to have nothing to do with the Scriptures. ... To such It maybe justly said: Who are you? VV hen and ^yhence came ye ? Not being mine, what do ye m that which is mine? In short by what right dost thou, Marcion, cut down my wood ? By what license dost thou, Valen- tmus, turn the course of my waters ? By what power dost thou, Apelles, remove my land- marks ? This is my property. Why are the rest of you sowing and feeding here at your pleasure ? Mine is possession ; I possess of old ; 1 have sound title-deeds from the first owners whose property it was. As they be- queathed It to me by will, as they left it in trust, as they solemnly charged me (admra' verunt, gave under oath), so I hold it : you certainly they have ever disinherited and dis- owned as aliens, as enemies. But whence are 13 193 Mt THE SYMBOL heretics aUens and enemies to the Apostles if nTfrom the diversity o£ doctrine, which they :rtL';z^n accordLg to *f 0- -r"' or receive, in opposition to the Apostles . Thus does the man trained in the law-schools „£ Carthage conf nte " Marcion the skipper fromPontus" (IK c. 30), by the argument of prescription He founds this argument on the Tosreslon by the Roman Church of the Apo. tolic Symbol long before the " f n;P« '» question crossed the Blaek Sea. He djsalWws ?he appeal to Scripture. The ChnrcU is in the appeal r ^^ ^ ^^^^ j^. possession of the truth, ot the livered to the saints. She can F" " sound title-deeds from the first owner, whose property it was." She produces her Apostol,^ Lubol This is the "rule "and "tessera of tirorthodox Faith, which the Apostles com- inted to her. This, -.St. A^W^^:: -'--.-^*:.f-r:rti^ttew::rs nreserves inviolate. Ana iui» &theGreat,i8"aweapon so cunningly .This is the meaning of ''naucleru^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ and 8«ems to fit the context of this passage better than "ship-owner.' 194 Hii OF THE APOSTLES. forged iu the workshop of heaven that it cuts ott aU heretical opinions at one stroke "— Ad Pulch c. 4. McGiffert would make the Roman Church wait tm Marcion had come and was spreading his heresy before she cast about for a means of defending the Faith-as if there were no doctrinal error before Marcion, and no use for a Baptismal Creed but to fight heresy withal! TertuUian, skilled in the law and familiar at first hand with the facts of the case, represents the Church to us as wiser more far-seeing, and more faithful in guarding the deposit. When she finds Marcion cut- tmg down her wood, felling the trees that had been planted by the Apostles, she warns him off, she bids him begone. And her Apostolic Symbol IS, TertuUian tells us, at once the weapon with which she drives away the in- truder and the deed of trust whereby she makes good her claim to the property. 195 THE SYMBOL III. «« The Skip- per PROM PONTUS. " In Adv. Marc. v. 1, Tertul- lian, addressing directly and by name, this same " skipper from Pontus," (he was a « skipper " fyo-Po-tu^ m more than one sense) says to him: ' H thou hast never received stolen or contraband goods into thy schooners, if thou hast never appro- priated any of the cargo to thy own uses or adulterated it, thou art more careful of course, and faithful in the things of God. Tell us, then, nray, by what symbol thou hast taken the teach- ino. of the Apostle Paul on board, who stamped the label on it, who handed it over to thee, who put it on board, that thou mayest be able fear- lessly to land it." Marcion held that the God re- vealed by Christ and in Christ was not the God of the Old Testament, and mamtained taat bt. Paul was with him in holding this. Tertul- lian iatimates that "the skipper from Pontus, who, he insinuates, had been a smuggler, and had been in the habit of tatapering with the goods that he carried for others, is no more to be trusted in handling the wares of God than the handling of worldly wares. He chal- m 196 OF THE APOSTLES. lenges him, therefore, to produce his bill of lading a8 a guarantee that he has not smug- gled the doctnn, of the Apostle aboard hi 8h.p, or adulterated it. The teaehin,.s of St the Church, as the Apostle himself belonged to her. If, therefore, Marcion had these Jres r f !r nu ' f'^'P ^^ "'"'"''' •'« "We to show that the Church had put her label on them and consigned them to him. The bill of ladir... would show this; he therefore bids .im e^- Hib t .t. Need It be pointed out that the bill of ladmg (symbolum) in question is no other than the Apostolic Symbol? The passage runs thus in the original Latin. "Quamobrem, Pontice nauelere, si nunauam cepisti, 81 nullum onus avert sti vel adultei- asti, cautior utique et fidelior in Dei rebus edasvelun nobis quo symbolo susceperlsAposto lum Pau urn, quis ilium tituli charactereXl^ sent, qu.s transmiserit tibi, quis imposuerit ut possis eum constanter cxponere." ^ ^"^"'' "* It is true that the context shows it to have been the God of the Old Testament, who 197 ' Il THE SYMBOL according to TertuUian, would have to con- Tn S . Paul and hU teaching to " the skipper rn.Pont«s." But as TertuUian everywhere insists that, in controverted -;*« , appeal does not lie to Scripture, and that he cCh alone has the office of guarding he Sure, and guaranteeing it to men a. Ae Word of God, it is only through the Church I:..eOodofthe2«rof"> llrr^1ynl:^i*^Hesaule Itw. S the "Father Almighty" of the Symbol ;tthe"skipper"hadenterediutote'agre. ment " But he had tampered with the goods, rtrUngtheKpUtlesofSt^aJ^^^^^^^ Tif ritrmfofts ^agreement" or "covenant (symDoi; witii j^^^n^ «ould not venture to produce it »" " because it would bear witness against him. In Swords, he could not land the adulterated goods "constanter," that IS fearlessly. 198 OF THE APOSTLES. IV. m Trenaeus, too, bears direct testi- j The Pre- mony to the pre-Marcionite axis- i confeTsion^ tence of the Symbol, over and ' above the indirect testimony that is impUed in his witnessing to its Apostolic origin. " As for Cerdon," he writes (Bk. 3, c. 4, n. 3), "who was before Marcion, he too under Hygi- nus, who was ninth Bishop, came to the Church, made his confession, and so continued, some- times teaching privily, sometimes again doing penance, and sometimes under censure for the evil he was teaching, and separated from the assembly of the brethren. And Marcion suc- ceeding him flourished under Anicetus who occupied the tenth (eleventh) place in the Episco- pate." The form of words, " made his con- fession," does not, at least in the formal and first intention of Irenaeus, bear the sense here that it has in current Catholic use. It means to make a formal profession of Faith, and such a profession supposes a fixed formula already existing in Rome before the man from Pontus ever set foot there. 199 THE SYMBOL Si mm This is more evident from the words of the Greek original, a fragment of which fortun- ately remains at this point. '£xxA,^c«. tkOw., xal k^oiiokoyof^lisvoi, ourux} durzUaSy r.ozk iikv XaOpoSidaaxnXmv^ noT£ de xdXiv l^o/iokoym'^/ievoi. The Verb s^niioXoyllv means to " make a full confession," whether of sins, or of the Faith, or what not, is to be gathered from the context. The context here shows that Oerdon made at least a confession of the Faith. " He came to the [Roman] Church [from Syria], made his profession, and so continued, now teaching [his heresy] secretly, now making anew his profession." It is with Cerdon's doctrinal standing, not with his moral status otherwise, that ^cenaeus is con- cerned ; for his whole work, as the title itself witnesses, is directed against heresy. His TToiAtv i^ofiu/oyotyiew? is therefore to be rendered " making again a profession of the Faith," or " recanting his errors," and not simply " again doing penance," as Keble has it. Would Irenseus deem it worth while stating that Cerdon, who had come from the East to Rome, went to confession there ? And who would care to know whether he did or not ? The 200 M OF THE APOSTLES. I' I second i^o,xoh,Yo0iM,,oi ^eans what the first means, as ^a/lfv attests ; and the whole drift and purpose of Irenseus indicates that the first has to do with Faith, at least primarily. Add to this that the " confession," which Cerdon made the second time was called for by reason of his having taught his errors secretly after he had made the first. Now, the very first thing that one who had taught false doctrine would have to do, before being reconciled to the Church, would be to recant his errors and profess the true Faith. It would be interest- ing to know what Harnack would make of r,o,.aor„o,.v.„ i„ this passage. The matter of course way in which Irenaeus uses the word implies that the people of Gaul, for whom particularly he wrote, were famHiar with the 6^okoYia in question. V. In his great work, De Pre- scriptionibus Tertulh'an rests his whole case against heresy upon the prior possession by the Church of " the 201 The Oath of Allegiance. TH E SYMBOL Faith once delivered to the saints." And this prior possession he proves by her Sym- bol, which is the deed of trust she got from the Apostles. The whole argument of the book assumes the existence of the Symbol from the beginning. By the Apostohc Sym- bol men were known lu be in communion with the Church of the Apostles, which was one. And the Symbol was guarded by theDisciphne of the Secret, whence it got the name ot « sacran^entum," that is, "oath," "mystery, « secret " Le^, me cite one or two passages in point. " Thus," he writes (/&., c. ^20), " so many Churches and so great are that one primitive Church from the Apostles, whence all have sprung.. AH by one prove their unity. Between all there is the communica- tion of peace, and the greeting one another as brethren, and the interchange of hospitality through the Symbol {con 'esser alio hospitali- tatm). And no other principle governs these privileges but the one (common) tradition ot the same mystery {ejusdem sacramenti una traditio)r In military language " sacramen- turn" meant, in the olden time, "the pre- 202 OF THE APOSTLES. liminary engagement entered into by newly enlisted troops ;" also, "the military oath of allegiance." ^ No word could better express the purposes of the Symbol, which was the preUminary engagement entered into by the neophyte or newly enlisted soldier of Christ in the Church Militant, and was professed, as we have seen, in baptism with an oath of fealty to Christ and to His Church. It was also " sac- ramentum " in three of the four meanings which the w^rd bears in ecclesiastical Latin. It came within the Discipline of the Secret, and w- ';herefore a " secret." For " to hide the s. X of a king " (Tob. 12 : 7) the Vul- gate ha "sacramentum regis abscondere." It enshrineu the mysteries of the Faith, and therefore was itself, by a common figure of speech, a " mystery." " And evidently great is the mystery of godliness," says St. Paul (1 Tim. 3 : 16), where the Vulgate reads " sac- ramentum pietatis." Once more, the Symbol was the whole revelation of God in a com- pendious form, and was therefore fittingly called " the gospel revelation," which is the * Cf. Harper's Freund's Latin Dictionary. 203 'ill .Ml ! THE SYMBOL »» meaning of " sacramentum " in a passage in Prude'atir?>.5 VI. The Chris- tian Pass- word. The expression " ejusdera sac- ramenti una traditio," in the pas- sage cited above, may be ren- dered " the exchange of the same password." When the little army of Christ, sworn to make war on sin and error only, moved out from Jerusalem to subdue the world, its pass- word was the Symbol. "We are called to the warfare of the living God," says Tertullian (Ad. Marty. 3) " from the moment that we return the passwoi i {cam in sacramentl verba eMpondimus)." This password it was that ^ i^overned" the "privileges" specified by him, namely, "the communication of peace, the greeting of brethren, and the interchange of hospitality," in the early Church. The pil- grim from afar gave the Symbol, and got in return the salutation of peace, the name of brother, the privileges of the welcome guest. So we read further on that heretics " are not » Cf . the Dictionary above cited. 204 ->,"■-;#■ OF THE APOSTLES. received into peace and communion by the Churches that are In any way Apostolic [i. e. as having been founded by an Apostle or mothered by such as were so founded], pre- cisely because of the diversity of their Symbol m no wise Apostolic {oh dwersitatem sacra- menti nullo modo apostoliciy^ When heresy unfurled its banner of revolt, it corrupted the Symbol of the Faith. This is what Irenaeus implies when he teUs us that « by no Rule of » !i;It^T- °- ^V ^'^'■"'°" ^PP^^'-^ ^ have openly it nTnl "'r. "^' """'' ""' ^^'''''" ^« Tertullian puts o thfrn ^', ^" T'^ '*'"^ °"' ^»"'« Valentinus kept L *^^^,^"'-«'' « ^ar but broke it to her hopes. Irenaeus indeed, tells us as much (Adv. Haer., bk. 4 ; c. 33^1"; bl L TT'i-" '^^'' •'"'•* *'^^^ ""^«'-« «re t^o Gods (n. 2). On the other hand, those who belong to Valen- Fath«; ;nrn !.''"'' *^"^"^ they confess one God the t^t M^V . n' V"^ °^ """' "»^y nevertheless say that this Maker of all things is Himself the fruit of defection onfl!^^' r'*'°'!'^«'»*°"«'-. confessing with their ton,?ue one Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God, while yet in thdr ^ottr. ".r":" r •^''•'^^"' ^'--*'- *- *•- ^myZ got en another to the Word, one to the Christ, another to the Saviour, . their tongues alone tend toward unity But they shall be accused by a prophet of hZZ"' "'^" ''""^•••* • • "»"•- -ords^are.Vr he is hateful to me even as the gates of hell who hides one thing m hxs heart and utters another " (n. 8). 205 Z : *■ T HE SYMBOL the heretics was the Word of God made flesh" (Bk. 3 ; c. 11 ; 3). Or, if heretics kept the Symbol, they kept the letter and »» ^e ^mt of it. "When you tempt them [Ae Valen- tinians] subtly," says TertulUan Adv^ » I) "by double-tongued ambiguity they affirm the common Faith." St. Cypr«.n says of he partisans of Novatian that they had .ndeed he Lme Symbol, b„ not " the same law of the Symbol," as CathoUcs (Ep. 69. 7). Vll. ThbFcnda- HGNTAL Law. To TertuUian the Symbol is « lex fidei," the law and norm o£ ■CaUVi When we ** enter the li;- he says, and profess the Chnsfan ; ^^n the wU of its law (c m*.n«m with our lips that we have renounced the devJ, [Upomp, Ld his angels"' He can no more conceive of the Church without her Symbo :,.. he can concave ^f .vU soe^ without its fundamental law. Ana as x^n" ' De Spect. 4. S06 OF THE APOSTLES. is the Founder of the Church, which rests on Faith as her fundamental law, so, according to TertuUian, Christ, the Author and Finisher of the Faith, is the Author of the Symbol also. This does not prevent him from holding at the same time and affirming that the Apostles are the authors of the Symbol. Christ is the Founder of t^>e Church, yet the Apostles also are her f oun .rs. Christ laid the foundation, the Apostles built upon it ; " For no one can lay another foundation but that which is laid, which is Christ Jesus" (1 Cor. 3 : 11). So Christ laid the foundation of the Symbol, the Trinitarian Formula, and the Apostles built upon it. In short, we may say of the Church, her Symbol, and her Sacraments, that Christ laid the. foundations and gave specific direc- tions how the work should be done ; the Apostles did but build upon the foundations laid by Him, and faithfully carry out His directions. 807 THE SYMBOL VIII. Evidence Subjective AND Objective. Any one who keeps these dis- tinctions in view will see how Ter- tullian can say that " this Kule," i.e. the Symbol, " was instituted by Christ^" while affirming also that the Apostles were " the authors " of it.^ McGiffert (p. 64) says that in this latter passage " the word regula evidently refers, not to any def- inite creed or symbol, but to the gospel preached by both " the Twelve and St. Paul. The adverb "evidently" is used here in a purely subjective sense. The objective evi- dence is all the other way. Here is a literal translation of the passage : " Even if Marcion had brought in his Gospel in Paul's own name, the document by itself alone (sin'gularitas Instrumenti) would not be enough to win our belief, without the support * De Praesc, c. 14. Adv. Marc, iv. 2. At page 49, Burns says : " He (Ter- tuUian) traces its (the Syrabol's) origin in the teaching of Christ, without showing any acquaintance with the later legend (sic) of its composition by the apostles." This does not indicate any wide or careful reading of Tertullian on the author's part. 208 OF THE AP0STLE 8. of those going before. For there would be required the Gospel which Paul found, in which he believed, and [that] with which he presently rejoiced to find his own in agreement. And in fa3t, for this reason he went up to Jerusalem to make the acquaintance of the Apostles and to consult with them, lest perhaps he had run in vain (Gal. 2 : 1.), that is, lest his faith and his preaching should not be in accordance with theirs. In fi .. , he conferred and agreed as with its authors about the Kule of Faith ; they gave him the right hand of fellowship, and thereupon apportioned the task of preaching, they going unto the Jews and Paul going unto the Jews and Gentiles." *1 IX. The Rule OP Faith. Marcion rejected the Gospel of Matthew, of Mark, and of John. He received the Gospel of Luke, but only to mutilate it. TertuUian argues that, as St. Paul had to get the Gospel which he preached accredited by the older Apostles, much more would the Gospel written by Paul's disciple, Luke, need to be accredited by them. There are several reasons why 209 THE SYMBOL regulafidei in this passage can mean only the Symbol. (1) The context seems to exclude any other meaning. In the preceding sentence TertuUian says that St. Paul consulted with the Apostles about " his faith and his preach- ing," i. e. the Gospel that he preached. Is it at all likely that a writer who is scarce less niggard of his words than Tacitus would re- peat the same thing in the very next sen- tence? But this is just what he did if we understand regula fidci, with McGiffert, to mean " gospel." The fact seems to be that TertuUian wants Marcion (or rather his dis- ciples) to understand that St. Paul, and there- fore St. Luke, too, not only preached the same Gospel as the Twelve, but also followed the Symbol of Faith which the Twelve had de- livered to tlie Church, "every clause" of it as he says elsewhere.'" (2). The Gospel is not a Rule of Faith, and is not therefore the regulafidei spoken of by TertuUian in this passage. The Gospel is the whole revelation of God in Christ, the res ere- denda or body of truths to be believed, not w De Praeac, c. 27. 210 OF THE APOSTLE S. the lex credendi, or rule of belief. The Sym- bol, on the other hand, is a lex credendi or regulafidei, first because it embodies just such and so many Gospel truths as the law of Christ, promulgated by the Apostles, makes it obliga- tory on all Christians to believe explicitly and profess; secondly, because it serves as the "rule " or standard of orthodoxy in the Chris- tian Church. (3). McGiffert makes it abundantly evident that "regula " is not always used by Tertullian of a definite creed. In the passage that we are now dealing with, however, the expression is, not "regula," but " regula fidei." Now, I make bold to affirm two things, first, that TertuUian nowhere else speaks of the Gospel as "regula fidei ; " and second, that wherever else he uses " regula fidei" it denotes, if not the Creed (which it does in every case but one), at least a creed or formulary of faith. The proof of this latter statement involves, as is obvious, the proof of the former. The ex- pression " regula fidei " occurs twice in De Praesc. (chaps. 12 and 13), once in Ado. Prax. (c. 3), once in De Virg, Vel (c. 1), 211 THE SYMBOL once in De Monocjamia (c. 2), once in Adv. 31arcionem (IV. n. 36), once in Be Jejunio (c. 1), and lastly in the passage under consid- eration (Adv. Marc. IV. 2). If it occurs anywhere else, I at least have been unable to find it. Well, in the first six cases it stands for the Symbol ; in the seventh, for a symbol or creed. In the sixth place (Adv. Marc. IV. 36), " reward " is coupled with " rule " of the faith. But the allusion to the " Virgin " and her descent from David (whence our Lord is the " Son of David ") in the very next sen- tence, suggests at once the " Virgin" of the Creed. In the seventh place {De Jejumo), the words are, « rule of faith or hope." He says thatMontanus and Priscilla and MaximiUa do not " preach another God [as Marcion did], nor divide Jesus Christ (1 Jo. 4 : 3), nor over- turn any rule of faith or hope, but teach for- sooth that we should fast oftener than marry." (This is sarcastic ; Tertullian is by this time a Montanist, and here defends their tenets). The reference is to "a symbol" {allquam regidam, not to the Symbol. But even here « regula fidei " denotes at least a creed or f or- 312 OF THE APOSTLES. mulary of faith j it certainly does not denote the Gospel. Our conchision, therefore, stands that " regula fidei " in Ado. Marcionem IV. 2. means the Symbol, and that Tertullian as- cribes the authorship of it to the Twelve. X. Meanino of " Regula." With Tertullian " regula fidei " is the Creed. He often calls it " regula " for short. But " reg- ula " has also other meanings. Whether it signifies the Creed in a given case, therefore, is to be gathered from the text of the pas- sage and the context. There is a passage in Adv. 3Iarc. 1. 20 which Kattenbusch cites in support of his thesis that the Old Roman Creed was drawn up before Marcion's time It runs : « They [his disciples] say that Mar- cion did not so much innovate upon the Rule, by his severance of the Gospel from the Law' as restore the Rule that had been adulterated in the time going before." McGiffert takes issue with Kattenbusch here ; he has to prove the la "'s reading of the passage wrong, or the theory that he has been at so much pains 213 THE SYMBOL li to prop up collapses utterly. He succeeds, indeed, in showing that " regulam," of itself, need not mean the Symbol here, but he fails completely to find any other meaning for it that will fit. He tells us that *' an examination of the context makes it evident that he [Ter- tullian] is thinking not of a creed but rather of the Canon of Scripture." Here, again, the word " evident " has no objective value. On the con- trary, it is evident, or ra<^^er clearly demon- strable, that TeituUian is tln.iking of the Creed, not of the Canon of Scripture. The Canon of Scripture embraced, first of all, the books of the Old Testament, and these Marcion rejected every How, then, could his disciples say that one. he had not so much innovated upon this Rule as restored it to its pristine form, when all the world knew that the books of the Old Testament were in the Canon centuries before a word of the First.Gospel was witten ? On the other hand, there was, properly speaking, no Canon of the New Testament, in Teitullian's time, which could be appealed to as a " regula." Nor would Tertullian, in any case, admit the Scrip- ture, or any part of it, as his " regula." 2U H I OF THE APOSTLE S. The context bhows that "regiila," in this passage, means the Gospel. But it does not mean the Gospel as preached by the Apostles, for thus the Gospel, instead of being a " rule," is itself, as has been already pointed out, sub- ject matter of the "rule." "Faith," says Tertullian himself, " is set in a Rule— Fides . i rey ulaposiio est" » Moreover, a nde, from the nature of the case, must be something that is available for everyday use. But how could the preaching of the Apostles be made use of in this way, or ev.in be known to the faithful of the post-apostoUc age? There was only one way in which they could know it— aside from the New Testament, which Tertullian does not acknowledge as his " regula " — and that was Apostolic Tradition. Now the whole preaching of the Apostles did not come down through this channel, at least in a fixed and compact form that would serve as a Rule of Faith. But the gist of it, set forth in terms of the Apostles' own choosing, came down in the "summary of sound words" (2 Tim. 1: 13) known as the Symbol. This it is that St. " De Praesc, c 14. 215 TH E SYMBOL Clement of Alexandria describes as " the know- ledge, in a brief and compendious form, of those things that are necessary to be known " « Fo"^ this," says Irenseus, and his words are wholly to our purpose, « is the essence {^^^^ori,) of the Apostolic doctrine and of the most holy Faith which was delivered to us, which the unlettered receive, and men of small learning taught, who give not heed to endless genea- loo-ies, but rather give diligence for the amend- ment of their life, lest they, deprived of the Divine Spirit, miss of the Kingdom of Heaven.' '=^ This, then, as Kattenbusch rightly inferred, is that "regulam" which Marcion innovated upon,— the " regulam " which proclaims one " God the Father Almighty, and Christ Jesus, His only Son, our Lord." For this was the head and front of Marcion's offending agamst the Faith, that he declared Christ was not the 13 Paed. 1.6; c. 10. ^^^,t kka a« iBWorks (translation by Keble) Frag. XXXV. p. 554. Ap- ropos of e:r.Aoy>) rendered " essence," Keble says : As the verb is used of picked men, I have ventured to trans- late the noun thus, as though the very cl^oice part^ And ceitainly the " medulla Fidei," the very marrow of the Faith is contained in the Symbol. 216 OF THE APOSTLES. Son of the Father Almighty "shamelessly blaspheming," says Irenaeus," '* Him who is declared God by the Law and the Prophets ; affirming Him to be an evil-doer, and fond of wars, and inconstant also in His judgment, and contrary to Himself; and as for "jesus' that He came from that Father who is above the God who made the world, into Jud«a in the time of Pontius Pilate the Governor, Tiberius Caesar's Procurator, and was manifest m human form to the inhabitants of Judaea, to do away the Prophets and the Law and all the works of that God who made the world, ^'■iom he also calls Ruler of the world (Cos- mocratorem)." XL The Marcionites seem to have : A Guess. affirmed (aiunt) what historical criticism affirms to-day, though for a different reason, that the primitive Creed was the simplest of simple formularies, being but a profession of belief in the Father, Son, and "lb. bk. 1; c. 37; n. 2. 217 THE SYMBOL Holy Spirit, in the very words of the com- mission given by our Lord to the Apostles (Matt. 28: 28), without addition of any sort. Such a Creed would have lent itself admirably to Marcion's pui-pose, who might have maintained with some degree of plausi- bility that it was Christ's own Creed, that r.a.ro.piropa of the first article was an un- warranted addition, and therefore that he did not so much innovate upon the Rule of Faith as restore it to its simple and pristine form. This guess (it purports to be no more) is strongly supported by the context. For Ter^ tullian goes on to say that the disciples of Marcion " point to the fact that Peter and the other pillars of the Apostolate were brought to book by Paul (Gal. 2) because they did not walk the straight way of truth in the Gospel.' For Marcion, be it borne in mind, mamtamed that St. Paul was with him in severing the Gospel from the Law, and, with a view of mak- ing good his contention, mutilated Paul's Epis- ties, as Iren^us bears witness, « by taking out whatever is plainly spoken by the Apostle of the God who made the world, how that He is 218 OF THE APOSTLES. anu the Father of our Lord Jesus CL hi , ..,„. whatsoever out of the prophetic witings the Apostle hath quoted in his teaching as ^.le- dictive of the coming of the Lord." '^ Am \ CONVEIiTED INTO A Certainty. XIL TertuUian shows that the pas- sage in Gal. 2, cited by the Mar- cionites, does not bear them out. The issue between Paul and the other Apostles, he observes, turned on a point of dis- cipline merely ; "the faith in the Creator and His Christ was never in question. For, had this been in question, it would figure prom- inently in the writings of the Apostle (Paul).'"^ He then clinches his case with an argument that converts the guess with which we have started out into a certainty, and once more re- veals the firm persuasion of the Christians of that day that the Symbol had been handed down from the Apostles. Here are his words : "Bk. 1; c. 27;n. 2. " Adv. Marc. 1. 1 ; c. 21. 219 THE SYMBOL Now, if after the time of the Apostles the truth got adulterated in respect of the rule of God, then Apostolic tradition in the time of the Apostles themselves was still incorrupt touching this Rule ; and no tradition can be admitted as Apostolic save that which is set forth to-day in the Apostolic Churches. But you will find no Church of Apostolic rating that does not christen in the Creator (quae non in Creatore christianizet). Or, if the Apostolic Churches were corrupt from the beo-inning, where shall sound ones be found ? Those opposed to the Creator, forsooth ? Produce, tlien a Church of yours that is rated as Apostolic, and you will have made out youi case. [This the Marcionite could not do]. Since, then, it is in every way clear that there was no other God but the Creator in the Rule of that sacrament {in regulce sacramentiistius) from the time of Christ to the time of Mar- cion, our position is now made secure enough : we have shown that the belief in the God of the heretic [Marcion] dates from the severance [by Marcion] of the Gospel from the Law. How could it be shown that no Church of Apostohc rating, as TertuUian words it, was to be found which did not christen in the Creator ? Not by the 'f«-/"^? of the Baptis- 220 OF THE APOSTLES. mal Formula, which Marcion could interpret in his own sense, but bj the ::aripa ^a.ro.pd ropa of what Tertallian here calls the "Rule of the Sacrament," i. e. the Baptismal Creed. And this Rule Tertullian proves by the tradi- tion of the Apostolic Churches to have existed, speaking broadly, " from the time of Christ." To sum up Tertullian's argument. The Marcionites maintain (aiunt) that their founder did not lamper mth the Rule of Faith, but rather restored to its pristine form the Rule which the Twelve had tampered with. For proof they point to the passage Gal. 2. TertulHan shows that the dispute red to in this passage concerned discipHne merely, and that St. Paul preached the same doctrine as the Twelve. He next shows that this doc- trine was anti-Marcionite. How does he do this i By means of the Apostolic Symbol. All the Apostolic Churches " christen in the Creator," a fact which is attested by the Symbol or « Rule of the Sacrament," and only by the Symbol. His adversaries might still maintain, however, that "after the time of the Apostles the truth got adulterated in respect of the Rule of God." 221 :if. ii: 1 THE SYMBOL But surely not in all the Apostolic Churches, is Tertullian's answer (though not very clearly expressed), else has tlie truth perished from the face of the earth. Either the Apostolic Churches hold the true Faith, or there is no true Faith to be found anywhere. If the Marcionites could point to even one Apostolic Church which christened in God or m the Father simply, and not in the Father Almighty, Tertul- lian would be willing to grant that they had gone some way toward making out their case. « But since it is clear that there was no other God but the Creator in the Rule of the Sacra- ment from the time of Christ to the time of Marcion," he feels that the bottom has been clean knocked out of the Marcionite content- ion.'7 n When St. Justin says that the Christian ' ' received the waslg with water in the name of God the Father and lord of the universe" (Apol. 1. n. 61), he too, is citing S°e Baptismal Creed, not the Baptismal Formula and bearing witness to the truth uf Tertullian's saying that all the Apostolic Churches " christened in the Creator. 222 OF THE APOSTLES. i XIII. An Instruc- tive Par- allel. It is instructive to note how Protostants stand to-day where the Marcionites stood in the second century, and have the same watch- word. "Back to Christ ! " cried the disciples of Marcion; "Back to Christ!" is the cry that is echoed in our own day. " Marcion in- troduced no new Rule of Faith, made no in- novations," said his disciples ; " he did but re- store the Faith of Christ in its pristine purity." Put Luther for Marcion, and how strangely familiar the words sound ! Luther, forsooth, was not an innovator, but a reformer ; and the word " Reformation " is made to confer im- mortality on the unblushing falsehood. It was the Apostles themselves, according to Marcion, who perverted the truth ; according to Luther, it was the Church founded by the Apostles. But the falsehood is fundamentally the same, for is it not written, and lo lam with you always even to the consurmmtwn of tJie worW If there are to-day— and we have no less an authority than Professor Harnack 2^^3 T HE SYMBOL for saying that there are—" numerous mem- bers of the Evangelic churches who, being sincere Christians [forsooth], feel themselves oppressed in conscience by many clauses of the Apostles' Creed," '« and would fain be rid ot the formulary, this does but attest once more the tendency of history to repeat itself. So felt Marcion and his followers, " oppressed in conscience by many clauses of the Apostles Creed, and they made all haste to cast them away. But the Church of the living God still stands where she stood, still holds fast the « Symbol of our Faith and Hope," '^ still walks in the way of that Tradition which she has "received from the Apostles; which Tradi- tion proclaims one God Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth." '° 18 The Nineteenth Century, July, 1903 ; p. 154. 19 St. Jerome, Contra Joann. Hier, n. 28. ao St. Irensus, Adv., Haer., bk. 3 ; c. 3 ; n. 3. $H OF THE APOSTLES. f i^ CHAPTER VII. THE SYMBOL IN THE SUB-APOSTOLIC AGE. I. - A Passage in Pliny. Before going to the New Testa- ment for traces of the Symbol, it may be worth our while to lojk into a passage that is to be found in the pages of a pagan writer of the sub-apostolic age. Pliny the Younger, who became Governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor, in the first decade of the second century, has this to say of the Christians in a letter to the Emperor Trajan : They [the Christians] declared this to be the sum of their wrong-doing or error, that they were wont to gather before dawn on a given day and say with one another a form of words (religious formula) to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath ... not to com- mit theft, or robbery, or adultery; not to break their word, and not to deny (or give up) 15 ^25 THE SYMBOL what was committed to their keeping, when summoned (before the courts).^ Newman (Development of Christian Docr ^rme, eh. VL, sect. l,n. 18) cites "How doth this chief sorcerer mock us, skilled by his Thessalian charm {carmine) to laugh at punish- ment '- as illustrating the force of camenm this passage. Carmen also means a formula m reli-ion or in law, as, diro quodam carmine mrlre'' Liv. 10. 38. 10; ^' legaiionis carmen recitarer Id. 3. G4. 10. It is difficult to con- ceive of anything that fits the carmen dicere Christo quasi deo secum inmcem of I'lmy better than the recitation of the Symbol in the assemblies of the faithful as it is done, m alternate parts, to this day. No other ancient formulary has made its way down from those early days which has a place in the Christian lAdfirmabant autem banc fuisse summan vel culpee J^vPl Troris quod essent soliti stato die ante lucem !!Epi:t Silil iotirEpiTt. CPUuii Traianolmpera- a Prud. in hon. Rom. V. 404, 868. 226 ';iti OF THE AP 0gr^.E3. worship and is at the same time a distinct pro- fession of faith in Christ as God. Schaff, in his Creeds of Christendom,^ says that the Apostles' Creed is " a liturgical poem and an act of worship," and so it is, and so it has been from the first. In the fifth century Faustus speaks of it as symholi saliitare car- men'^ a.iiA again calls it ccelestis sapientiae vitale carmen, s Pliny, in his letter to Trajan, asks how he is to deal with the Christians in his jurisdic- tion. On various occasions already he has had some of them before his tribunal, and the evi- dence they gave is under his eyes, or at any rate, fresh in his mind, as he writes. It is but natural, therefore, to conclude that v hat they had to say for themselves, as set forth in the passage cited above, is given in their own words. The reader will note the expressions " fidem fallerent " and " depositum abnegar- ent." The former of the two has an obvious classical sense. But it does seem likely that "Vol. I, p. 15. *(DeSpir.,I. 1). ^Hom. 1 de Symbolo. T HE SYMBOL it bote a deeper meaning for men who were wiUing at all times, as Pliny himself bears wit- ness in this letter, to lay down their Uves rather than prove false to the " ^artb once de- Uvered to the Saints." There would have been little reason for swearing that they ''^1* ""' break their wo.-, mueh for swearing that they would be true to the Faith. n. GUARDING THE Deposit. The second of the two expres- sions is even more significant. It mio-ht seem at first that the clause « ne depositum" appellati abnegarent " is to be construed to mean no more than this, that Christians took an oath " not to refuse to give up ,vhat was committed to them in trust when caUed upon " to do so. This is ho- ■ the annotator of the edition of PUny'^ LetUrs that bes before me interprets the clause, for he comments, A frequent temptation, on account of the want ofLurities." But had this been the mean- i„.r intended, we should have "appeUanti no^ "appeUati." "Abnegare" takes a dat- !'.=i| OF THE APOSTLES. ive of the person from whom the thing is with- held, as "Rex tibi eonjugium abnegat"^ " Appellati," in the context of the passage be- fore us, can mean only « when summoned be- fore the courts," or « informed against," which comes to the same thing. Now it would be absurd for any one to swear that he would give up the thing committed to him in trust on being cited before the courts, when he could not choose but give it up, the law compeUing him. Hence the word « depositum " must bear a special meaning in the present instance. The meaning that it bears is not far to seek We have seen how St. Gregory Nazianzen re- fers to the Syml ' , « that excellent Deposit of the fathers that were nearest to Christ." We read how one of these "fathers " bids his disciple, " Guard the good deposit committed to thy trust, by the Holy Ghost who abideth in us."-2 Tim. 1 : 13. The words of the Apostle find an echo in Justin Martyr. The same word ? zat fjj 6 xupwg WijiToui Xpiaroi xai to nvsofxa to ayiov rj re niffTi^ xai ij iXnii Twv ixhxTibv,^^ where the words ^ ncaTu stand in apposition to the preceding sentence. He compares with it Jerome against John of Jerusalem (c. 28). " In symbol© fidei et spei nostrae . . . omne dogmatis christianae sacra- mentum carnis resurrectione concluditur." Then he asks whether these words do not point to the neighborhood where the Old Ro- man Creed was composed." '^ Rather do they point to the Old Roman Creed itself. For, as Irenaeus tells us, " In the time of this Clement no small tumult having arisen among the brethren which were in Corinth, the Church in Rome wrote a most ef- fective letter to the Corinthians, urging them to be at peace with one another, and renewing their faith, and [setting forth] the tradition which it had recently received from the Apos- tles, which tradition proclaims one God A\- " Op. oit. p. 64. *» " As Qod lives and the Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost, the Faith aud Hui>e of the elect." 235 TH E aiMBOL mighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth."" The ph^se'' pointing to" might -^^-^^^^S^ L the meaniag, take the pUce of " se mg forth ■• supplied by Keble. Nowhere m Clem- ent's first Epistle is " the tradition recently re- ceived from the Apostles, which tradition pro- claims one God Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth," set forth. But there « a distinct aUusion to it in the words of the oath cited above, and again (c. ^. 2) where Clement calls it the glorious and venerable rule («-;«) of our tradition (.«^««-»« al »M«»0 " «a"'ng, and adds significantly: "Let us see what is good andplfasingintheeyesofHimwhomad us ; " to wit, " the Father Almighty ot the Symbol. u Adv. Haer. 1. 3, c. 3, n. 3 (as ia Keble's translation). 236 OF THE APOSTLES. i) f I CHAPTER VIII. THE SYMBOL IN THF NEW TESTAMENT. State op the Question. " Many attempts have been made," says Burn,' to extract a formal Apostles' Creed from the New Testa- ment by comparison and combination of vari- ous passages. However ingenious, they always fail to prove more than this — that there was an outline of teaching (rurrof 3cdaxr,r could in the " deposit " which the Chris- tians of Asia Minor in his day so nobly kept at the cost of their lives, what time he ordered them to be put to death for no other crime than their" unbei d'r^' stubbornness," as he calls it, in confessing " the Faith once for all delivered to the saints." Scriptural, Allusions, VI. But historical criticism does discern in the New Testament " an outline of teaching upon which ^ apostolic preachers and writers were agreed." This is quite enough for our purpose. Even the critics will be driven by the inexorable law of logical consistency to admit that this outline can be no other than our Symbol. But first let us look into some of the allusions to the Creed, veiled indeed but unmistakable, that are to be found in the New Testament. 244 r^^-jmok. .iSMJ. ^-t;-.. ..B»jriift,yqBaj»»ngiiiaBP^E^gg:;aB«Ba> tl. •fi.aa' •% i" OF THE APOST LES. The " outline " in question it is that St. John refers to when he bids his disciples not to receive into their houses nor give greeting to the one who "bringeth not this teaching " (2 Jo. 11). « Whoso," says Polycarp, descHb- ing somewhat more fully for us ''this teach- ing " of his master, " conr\}sses not that Jesus Christ came in the flesh, he is Antichrist ; and* whoso twists the words of the Lord after his own caprices, and says that there is to be no resurrection and no judgment, he is the firstborn of Satan. Wherefore renouncing the vain conceits of the many and their false doctrines, let us return to that word which was delivered to us from the beginning." ^ This " outHne," this " word," was a summary of Apostolic teaching, the Gospel in a compen- dious and portable form, which could be " brought " and set forth by the pilgrim and the stranger, and which should serve those to whom they brought it as a test or tessera of orthodoxy. Christian Antiquity knows of no formulary that answers this description but the Symbol of the Apostles. « Cf. A. Lapide's Commentaries (in 2 Ep., 8 Job.) Iff, T HE SYMBOL « Baptism," we read in 1 Peter, 3 ; 20-22, « consisteth not in a cleansing of the impuri- ties of the flesh, but in the examination of a good conscience toward God." On this the Abb^ Fouard remarks : " The Greek com- mentators explain the word ^-^/'--J by the synonyms ^f^^"*^'^. "C^rr,^:?, and the Vulgate translates it by ' interrogation Pe Wette and Huther(in Meyer's Commentary) recognize the fact that this is an allusion to the Baptismal interrogation, and consequently to the Profes- sion of Faith— the Credo— demanded of every catechumen. It is worthy of note that three articles of the Apostles' Creed are mentioned here by St. Peter as making part of this inter- rogation of a good conscience before God, this interrogation which saveth us by the Reswrrec- lion of Jesus, Who . , . . is ascended into Heaven and sitteth at tlie right hand of God:'* One is reminded of the words of Tertullian,' "The soul is sanctified, not by the washing, but by the response ; " and again,*^ " After this 4 St Peter and the First Years of Christianity (trans- lated by a. F. X. Griffith. Longmans, 1898) p. 289, footnote. » De Resurr. Carnis. 48. • De Cor. Mil. a. 248 OF THE APOSTLES. we are thrice dipped, answering somewhat more fully than the Lord determined in the Gospel," to wit, the Faith in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. In 1 John, 5:5, 6, where Faith in Christ is the theme, Westcott, cited by Burn (p. 18), notes how the aorist points to the sing-le moment of baptism. " This is the victory that overcame {v^t'Tjffaaa'j the world, even our faith. Who is he that overcometh (' 'tSv) the world, but he that belie veth that Jesus is the Fm of God." The Pattern OP Sound Words. VII. In the Epistle to the Hebrews, St. Paul speaks of the " first elements of the oracles of God " (5 : 12) given to those who were born again by baptism, even as " milk " is given to a " babe " (v. 13). This appears to be " the confession (rr/y dfxoXojriai) " that he had referred to in a preceding chapter (4 : 12). This " outline," which suggests the ;r«/'«'f^'>« of Irenaeus and the " indicium " of Rufinus, was in the nature of a " deposit " (1 Tim. 6 : 21 ; 2 Tim. 1 : 12, 247 TH E SYMBOL U) or sacred trust to be guarded by the faith- ful • a " form " or " pattern " or « summary of « sound words " first " heard among many witnesses," and to be committed to "faithful „,en " who should be " fit to teach others also (2 Tim 2-2). On these passages ot bt. l:'aui a letters "to Timothy, the Anglican Blunt observes : " It is almost mipossible to find any other meaning for the Apostle's words if they do not refer to such a formulary as the Creed. And the Abb^ Fouard ' points out that the ^ord o^oror:..:, rendered " form " in the Enghsh version, is employed by Sextus Empiricus to denote " an abridgment of a doctrme or phil- osophy." There are further allusions to the Creed in the writings of St. Paul as weU as m the other Pastoral Epistles, but enough to have cited these. VIII. SuHMiNo UP : Let us now sum up the case THE Case : ^^^ ^^ie ApostoUc authorship of the Symbol so far as it rests on the evidence to be found in the New Testament. There f Loc. cit. 248 OF THE APOSTLES. existed in the Apostolic Church an "out- line of teaching," a "summary of sound words," a "confession," a "deposit," which was to be guarded with jealous care, which was closely bound up with the sacra- ment of baptism, which was a tessera of or- thodoxy, which was committed by the Apostles to faithful men who were charged, in their turn, to hand it on to the succeeding genera- tion of beUevers. A century glides away, and we find Irenaeus, who is brought up in the East, and Tertullian, who is brought up in the West, setting forth a "doctrine," a "tradi- tion," an "outline," a "tessera," a "Rule of Truth," a " Rule of Faith," which served as a Baptismal Confession in their day, and which we identify with the Old Roman or Apostles* Creed. Both of these witi ^sses, one of whom is the disciple of Polycarp who got the " teach, ing " and tessera of the Apostolic Faith from St. John, assure us that the Rule of Truth and Faith which baptism bestowed on them was everywhere the same within the pale of the world-wide Church, and that it was instituted by the Apostles. 249 m THE 8YMB0L Briefly, then, the case stands thus. His- torical criticism will either admit the « teach- ing" of St. John, the " deposit" and " pattern of sound words," and « outline of teachmg," spoken of by St. Paul, to be identical with Iren^us's « outline " and -Rule of Truth, with Tertullian's "tessera" and "Rule ot Faith," or it will not. If it will, then it acknowledges the Apostles to be the authors of the Symbol. If it will not, let it first settle its account with Irenseus and TertuUian, to whom it has given the lie, and then find for us, in the writings of the second century, the "teaching" of St. John, and the " deposit which Timothy was to keep himself and hand on to faithful men, as he had been solemnly charged to do by the Apostle. Its quest of this lost formulary is Uke to prove more labol^ ious and, if that were possible, even less fruit- ful than its quest of the source whence came the Symbol. 250 OP THE APOSTLES. n IX. Let me try by means oi a, '. ^ Simple simple parable to bring the matter \...^.^^.^^^^:... home to the minds and understandings of the critics, if haply those doubting Thomases can be got to believe when it has been given them to "touch and see." A writes to B to inform him that he is sending a parcel by C, who is well known to both. In due time C arrives with the parcel, and hands it to B, telling him that this is the parcel A had sent him. B jots down in his notebook the fact of his having received from A the parcel in question, and gives a description of its contents. In ordinary life, X, Y, or Z, on reading the entry in B's notebook, would never dream of doubting that it was correct — unless he had positive proof that B was a liar and deceiver. Well, A is the Apostle John, C is Polycarp, his disciple, and B is Irenaeus, who sat at the feet of Polycarp and got from him the Creed which he describes for us in his works, and describes in such a way as to enable us to identify it with Tertullian's Rule of Faith 251 ill TH E SYMBOL and the Symbol of the Roman Church. Either, then, Irenaeus is a liar, or his Baptismal Creed has the Apostles for its authors. If earUer writers of the second century, Ignatius, Polycarp, Justin, or the nameless author of the DidacM, gave us a definite "outline of teaching" or "pattern of sound words," other than the Creed of TertuUian and Irenaeus, and assured us that they got it from the Apostles, the case would be different. But either they are silent altogether, or the allu- sions they do make to a form of teaching are just such as we should expect from men who had a definite Creed but forbore, as did the Apostles before them, to set it forth in writing. X. When, therefore, Harnack, with his customary assurance, tells us that, *' There did actually exist in the East (in Asia Minor or, as the case may be, Asia Minor and Syria), as early as the beginning of the second century, inter aha a christological m"'"?^" which is most inti- mately rekted to the second article of the 253 Harnack's Guesswork. OF THE APOSTLES. Roman creed " (p. 69), he does but thrust his crude guesses upon us for historical facts. What warrant has he for the assumption of a phirality of formulas implied in his inter alia and expressed in his christological iJ^d^im re- lated to but not identical with the second article of the Roman Creed? Not the least shred of real warrant. Ignoring the so patent fact that the Symbol was not a written creed, and taking no account of the Discipline of the Secret, he mistakes for confessional formulas what are really but fragments of the Symbol. St. John has but one " teaching " for his dis- ciples to believe in, and for the stranger to "bring " to them in token of fellowship in the same Faith. St. Paul knows of but "one Lord, one Faith, one Baptism," one " outline of teaching," one " pattern of sound words," one " deposit," which his disciples are to guard and to hand on to other faithful men. St. Polycarp speaks of but one " word delivered to us from the beginning," and St. Justin of one " Confession in the Christ of God." Irenaeus has but one " Rule of Truth " which one Bap- tism bestows on believers throughout all the 253 '^ THE SYMBOL world, and Tertullian*s Tessera is " one, sole, unchangeable, and irreformable." We con- clude, then, that Harnack's alia exist only in his too exuberant imagination, and that in reality even his " christological M^'^^Ma " is but another name for the many-named Symbol. In matter o£ fact, we have it on the authority of the Emperor Justinian, in his Adv. Origenem, that, in the East, mathema and Symbol were used interchangeably to denote the Baptismal Creed. For he tells us that, in the Council of Chalcedon, the Fathers " followed in all things the aforesaid symbol or mathema;' i.e. the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, and that the Fathers at Ephesus ^* ana- thematized those who should give candidates for baptism another [i.e. a different] definition of Faith, or symbol, or mathema." ' » Migne, torn. 69, col. 246. 9U OF THE APOSTLES. CHAPTER IX. DRAWN UP B7 THE TWELVE. I. Not the least interesting chap- • The Abbe ter of a deeply interesting book I Theory.'^ is that in which the AbbeFouard discusses the origin of the Apostles' Creed.^ He traces it to an Apostolic source, but not to the traditional one. Because of variations which are « incontestable," he finds that he cannot « accept \iithout reservation the tradi- tion which credits the composition of the Symbol to the Twelve on the eve of their sep- aration " (p. 237). He says : "^he time was not one likely to produce tor, lanes. The Church, being still oriental ^St. Peter and the First Years of Christianity (tian- Slated b^ G. F. X. Griffith). Longmans, 1898. 255 :!'1 THE SYMBOL to all outward seeming, preached and medi- tated without feeling any need of dogmatizmg on her beUefs. The disciples' only anxiety was to treasure up every one of the Master's words, and thus embrace the whole body of the truth, not to compress it uito a precise form. When Rufinus credits the Apostles with so much anxiety lest they should fail to teach the one same doctrine, after their dispersion, he forgets that the Holy Spirit spoke by their mouth, and was to assist them to the very last hour of their lives. So, then, we conclude that the Creed had its origin, not in Jerusalem but at a later date, in Rome, when Peter and Paul were nearing the close of their lives." The reasons given by the learned Abbe in support of this view are more specious than solid. The ancient tradition has to be taken without reservation or not at all. In Leo the Great we have a most trustworthy exponent of it, and one who certainly would not abate by as much as a jot or tittle the prerogatives of the See of Peter. Yet he knows of no Symbol composed by SS. Peter and Paul. His is duodecirn apostolorum totidem signata sen- tentiis — the joint composition of the Twelve. 256 OF THE APOSTLES. n. The Unai,- TERED Sym- bol. Let us take the Abbess reasons in order. Variations in the form of the Symbol are by no means incontestable, in an unqualified sense. The Symbol, as has been so often observed, was not first given in writing, nor is it found in writing earher than the fourth century, though Ire- naeus and Tertullian embody the drift and meanmg of it in words of their own, and there are fragments of it scattered here and there in almost all the early writings. Rufinus is our first witness to the precise form in which it was recited by the candidates for baptism. And he tells us that, while additions, all of them in- considerable, were made « in divers Churches, yet this is not found to have been done in the Church of the city of Rome." ' Rufinus gives two reasons why the Roman Church " kept her Symbol inviolate," as St. Ambrose puts it : (1) that « heresy never had Its origin there," and (2) that " it was cus- tomary in Rome from the olden time for those • In Symh. Apoat, n. 8 (Migne, torn. ? , col. 339). 17 257 THE SYMBOL who were about to receive baptism to recite the Symbol publicly, that is, iu the hearing of the faithful ; and certainly those who went before us in the faith would not bear to hear even a single word added" to the Creed B^n questions the historical accuracy of what Ru- tinus says in the first place, and remarks that, " The comparative freedom from the assaults of heresy which the Roman Church enjoyed during the fourth century, when Rome wasthe refuo-e of Athanasius and Marcellus, tended to obscure the fact that during the second and third centuries the city was the favored resort of false teachers " (p. 58). But Rufinus does not say that heresy was not taught in Rome ; what he says is that it did not originate there. And this seems to be true, at least in the sense that those who taught heresy there were not members of the local Roman Church, but came from without. Thus Valentinus, and Cerdon, and Marcion, heresiarchs of the second cen- tury, came to Rome from the East, where they were imbued with the errors " of Simon and his sect," as Irenaeus bears witness ; ^ also {lb. n. 4), » Bk. 1 ; c. 27 ; n. 1 ; 258 OF THE AP0STLR9. where he describes them as the « disciples and successors of Simon the sorcerer of Samaria." Novatus and Novatian, in the following cen- tury, were not Romans, the one being an African, the other a Spaniard ; and i hev taught no new heresy. The false doctrines which they spread had their root in the i»Ion- tanist error. Gt. Ambrose, or whoever the author is of Explanatio SymhoU ad Initiandos, touches the fundamental reason why the Roman Church kept her Symbol unclianged when he calls attention to the singular veneration with which the See of Peter, the Apostolic See, regarded the Apostolic Symbol. "If," he says, "we may not take anything from or add anythino- to the writings of one Apostle, we certainly may not take anything from or add anything to the Symbol which we accept as having been composed and handed down to us by the (twelve) Apostles. This is the Symbol which the Roman Church possesses—the Church over which Peter, the chief of the Apostles presided, and to which he brought the common formula (of Faith) — eommunem sententiam." 259 THE SYMBOL III. But let us grant the variations i^J^J^C"* (in the form, not in the articles • of Faith embodied) in the Symbol, mcon- testable. Is not the objection which the Abb^ bases upon them a sword that cuts both ways? Is a Creed composed by the Apostles Peter and Paul, in Rome, when near- intr the close of their lives, in any essential respect less venerable or sacrosanct a formu- lary than a Creed composed by the Twelve, in Jerusalem, on the eve of their dispersion? Singularly enough, this objection, which Bum, too, urges, as we have seen, and, without being aware of it, satisfactorily solves, is solved by the Abb^ also, in the following passage, with- out being himself the wiser for it : « Nevertheless let us call to mind the fact again that it [the Symbol] was never regarded as an inspired witness, an immutable text, m the same sense as our Holy Books. It was a formula of initiation, a Profession of J^aith, hence Christians were careful in preserving ks exact terms ; but it was not a document o revelation, and hence the perfect freedom with 260 OF THE APOSTLES. Which outside of Rome, in the first centuries, moHifl-f ''''•'' v^^l '^''^^^ they proceeded to modity its primitive form."* While this disposes of the objection, it is not Itself correct in every particular. The feymbol was not regarded as an "immutable test, for the simple reason that it was not from the first a " text " at all. But it was re- garded as immutable, the truths it embodied being immutable. A -document of revela- tion It was not, it is true, but an authentic summary of the Christian revelation, an « out- line » of oral teaching, a « pattern of sound words. It was not, nor did it purport to be a new revelation, but a summing up of what had been already revealed. At the same time, there is no reason for assuming that it was not held to be an inspired witness, seeing that the authors of it were inspired and infallible— not less inspired and infallible when they delivered their message by word of mouth than when they delivered it in writing. Li point of fact the author of the Explanatio deems the Sym- * lb. 245. 2G1 ii^i bol to have greater aathorlty than the writings !f any one Apostle, as being the jomt work of of any one ^p . . j ^f p^ith given tZ though it has no greater .ntnns.c an- thority. RUFINTTS Speaks for Himself. IV. The Abb^ does Rufinus less than justice when he represents him as "crediting the Apostles ^th so much anxiety lest they f "" f ^^. -t:'r-ru/nr:;afi:rtit.: rr:; thus about to separate from one a. r:?=::>:r:--yLdg.ein different directions one sho.Udse^fortl^ those who were nivited to receive Christ somethins different from jluvt J-as se , u " TJiifinus in thinking ot tne f th by ano her ^^^^' ,^^ ^^^^^^,^ Profession oi *.iitn v>nii-i .iMt.rk 16: according to the Divine command (Mark !il!^ OF THE APOSTL ES. 16), of all those who should seek to enter the Church by baptism. Now, while there was not the least danger that the Apostles themselves would fail to teach the same doctrine, in a general way, there was grave danger that those who came after them should not. What is more, nothing short of a miracle would have made the Apostles individually embody the self-same points of faith and the same number of articles in the formulary that was to be ten- dered to the candidates for baptism, had they not collectively agreed upon it before their separation. V. A>" Addi- tional. PllOOF Here we have a fresh proof, and an irrefragable one, of the truth of the ancient tradition. In the latter half of the second century, the Baptismal Creed of all the Churches, both in the East and in the West, was, so Irenjeus and Tertullian assure us, one and the same. How came it to be one and the sauie ? If it had been composed in Rome by SS. Peter and Paul, as the Abbe Fouard supposes it to have 2G3 THE SYMBOL t been, it could not have made its vaj into the other Churches, for each Church founded by an Apostle would cling to its own Confession. If, on the other hand, its own Confession, the Confession it got from its founder, tallied ex- actly with the Roman one, this, failing a pre- existing agreement between the founders, could not be without a miracle — and miracles hold a first place in the great category of entia that are not to be multiplied without necessity. It will be said that this reasoning rests on an assumption which may be challenged, the assumption, namely, that each of the Apostolic Churches had a Baptismal Creed from the first. "The Church," we are told, "being still oriental to all outward seeming [what time the Apostles were all together in Jerusalem], preached and meditated without feeling any need of dogmatizing on her beliefs." This, rather, is the assumption, and one not recon- cilable with known facts. The Church from the Day of Pentecost onward, in obedience to the Master's injunction, did more than preach and meditate — she baptized, and, when there was question of adults, baptized only such as 2G4 OF THE APOSTLES. made a profession of faith in the truths of the Chnstian Religion. Is it not fatuity (the word IS almost a mild one) to think that the Apostles failed to realize that it was their place as the first and supreme pastors of the Church to determine, once and for all, what truths of the Christian Religion should be embodied in that profession, and in what " form of sound words ? " VI. One more citation from the Abbe, and we have done with this phase of the subject. He is setting forth the reasons which led him to con- jecture that the Symbol was composed in Kome : Primary Pur- pose op the Symbol. . ^r"l^5?'''f.P^^^^ *"^ *""e alike had changed Difficulties and divisions came to trouble the unanimous faith of the first day The doctrines of these innovators were not ;« much to be feared as their .speech, for it spread Uke a cancer, masking its inward corruption undej a profane show of new words (2 Tim. -■ 1' • lo shun these pitfalls of speech. ^05 2 • 1 7^ THE SYMBOL it behooved their leaders to arm themselves with certain fixed terms. Hitherto the Apostolic preaching had aimed solely at making Jesus better known and loved. Now the hour was come for embodying their teaching in a few essential dogmas, which all could commit to memory, and hold as a safeguard against heresy." (p. 238). This takes it for granted that the primary purpose of the Symbol was to serve as a safe- guard of the Faith and a test of truth and error, whereas its primary purpose was con- fessional and catechetical. " With the heart," says St. Paul, " we believe unto justice, but with the mouth confess^ : is made unto salva- tion."— Rom. 10 : 10. ir s pleasant to find oneself for once in accord with Harnack, who says on this point : " The purposes for which it [the Symbol] was composed can be determined with certainty from our knowledge of its uses : it sprang out of the missionizing and catechi- zing function of the Church, and was origin- ally merely the confession to be used at bap- tism (ter mergitamur, amplius aliquid respon- dentes quam Dominus in EvangeUo determina- 266 OF THE APOSTLES. vit.— TertuUian)." 3 Jt jg singular that one who was clear-sighted enough to see this should not also have seen the consequence logically involved in it. Since the missionizing and catechizing function of the Church began on a world-scale when the Apostles set themselves to " preach the Gospel to every creature," the formulary which has ever been the basis of catechetical instruction in the Church must have come into exist^^nce about the same time. Furthermore, error was to be met from the very first. The Apostles knew from the first that heresies would arise, for the Master had clearly foretold this (Matt. 7 : 15). It was needful, therefore, that, from the first, they should make provision against heresy. 'The Nineteenth Centnnj, for July, 180.3; art. " Tlie Apostles' Creed," translated from the Germau by Mary A. Ward. 26^ THE SYMBOL CHAPTER X. THE KERYGMA AND THE SYMBOL. L The Rule of Faith. The more recent writers on the Creed assume Tertullian's "Rule of Faith" and Irenaeus's "Rule of Truth," (which he, too, in one place names the " Rule of Faith ") ' to be identical with the ApostoUc Symbol. It is true that Harnack tries to show that the Rule of IrenaBus was not at all a Baptismal Creed ; that it was drawn up independently by Irenaeus himself. But this opinion of Harnack's, singular in every sense of the word, has been shown elsewhere to be untenable.' One who should read only the later works on the Creed would not even know 1 .4dtJ. Haer. bk. 1 ; c. 23 ; n. 1. » C£. Chap. III. 268 U^iW OP THE APOSTLES. that there ever has been question at any time of the « Rule of Faith " being other than the Symbol. Yet the Catholic Probst and the Anglican Swainson have maintained that the two are not identical. And Dom Gasquet, in an article contributed to The DuhUn Review for October, 1888, deems their arguments " conclusive." ^ At the same time he holds that *' the distinction between the Creed and the Rule of Faith must not be too strongly pressed." The fact that the later critics sim- ply overlook these arguments seems to imply that they attach little weight to them. Nor are they undeserving of being thus ignored. II. We are told that the Creed and the Rule of Faith "are clearly distinguished by Clement of Alexandria." Let us first of all try to get a right understanding of this matter. When It is said that the Creed and the Rule of Faith are distinct, the implication is that the latter, too, is a definite formulary. • lb. p. 279. 269 r '■; Not jl Defi- nite Formu- lary. THE SYMBOL Swainson in fact speaks of both the one and the other as " documents," ^ though all Chris- tian Antiquity attests that the Creed was not a " document " at all from the first, but an oral confession of the Faith. If by the " Rule of Faith " we understand, not a definite formu- lary, but Apostolic Tradition in general, or the teaching of the Church or the Fathers, or the exposition of the Creed given orally by those intrusted with the task of preparing candi- dates for baptism, the distinction between the Symbol and the Rule of Faith is freely granted. But then it is a perfectly futile distinction. No one would dream of identifying the Sym- bol with Apostolic Tradition, of which it is but a small, though exceedingly important part, or with the preaching of the Church and teach- ing of her doctors, of which it is but the briefest kind of summary. * The Moene and Apostles' Creed, p. 9. 270 OF THE APOSTLES. III. v 5! A Plentiful Lack of Clearness. As regards Clement of Alex- andria, the only thing that really is clear in his works touching this question of the Creed is a plentiful lack of clearness. He is vague and obscure of set purpose. Whatever else he makes a mystery of, of this he makes none. Over and over again he warns the reader that it is only " to him who is capable of receiving in secret the things traditionally delivered that that which is concealed shall be made known." s Clement shows himself ever most careful not " to com- mit to writing things which," as he says a little further on, " we are on our guard even to speak about." He does in one place, after making a distinct reference to the Baptismal Creed as ^57" ijno^oyiav njv icpn^ Tiia^ « \\^q Cou- fession that we have " — , go on to men- tion " the ecclesiastical rule, and especially that profession which is made about things of su- preme importance." ^ That " profession " » Strom. 1. 1. c. 1, « Strom. VIL c, 15 : n. 90. ■m: 271 MICROCOPY RESOIUTION TEST CHART (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No. 2) A APPLIED IM/^GE 1653 East Mam Str««i Rochtjlur, Nto York 1*609 USA (716) 482 - 0300 - Phon. (716) 288-5989 - Fo« THE SYMBOL (iiioXoyiav'^ is again the Creed. What " the ec- clesiastical rule " is we can only guess. But as he speaks in the preceding sentence of the duty of " the good man not to lie, and not to go back on what he has promised," where the context implies an allusion to the baptismal vows, we inay infer that " the ecclesiastical rule " which it is the duty of the Christian not to transgress is the whole obligation taken in baptism, which binds the neophyte, among other things, especially to keep the Confession of the Faith. For the rest, so effectually has St. Clement concealed the mysteries from the uninitiated that Harnack is in doubt whether the Saint does or " does not in one place as- sume the existence of a fixed symbol," and says that, in either case, " there is no art that can discover how this symbol ran." ' IV. St. Cyprian's gt. Cyprian is said to distin- ' guish "even more explicitly" than St. Clement between the Creed and the Rule of Faith. If it could be "> The Apo»tle»' Creed, p. 67. 272 OF THE APOSTLES. S ;i ! shown from other sources that there existed in Cyprian's time a doctrinal formulary akin to the Creed but distinct from it, Iiis " lex," in one instance, might perhaps be taken to mean this formulary. As it is, the assumption that it does mean a formulary at all is founded on nothing better than a blind guess. Cyprian says that " we and the schismatics (Novatian) have not one law of the Symbol, nor the same interrogation." « But the Symbol itself in Cyprian's time was known as the " law " and " rule " of the Faith. So TertuUian, in the earlier part of the third century, always calls it, and if any man can be said to have known TertuUian by heart, that man's name is Cy- prian. Now, what a law needs to apply it is not another law but authentic interpretation, and this seems to be the force of " symboli legem " in Cyprian. " For when they ask," he goes on to say, " Dost thou believe in the remission of sins and eternal life through the holy Church? they lie in the interrogation itself, seeing that they have not the Church."- Yet, plain it is that they had the Church, as to • Ad Magnum, o. 7. 18 273 THE SYMBOL the letter. But " holy Church " meant one thing to them and quite another thing to Catholics. In other words, they differed from Catholics, not in the letter of the Symbol, but in the interpretation of it. In the earlier part of this same paragraph, Cyprian distinguishes between " law " and " symbol," where he states the objection that " Novatian holds the same law which the Catholic Church holds, and baptizes with the same symbol that we do." But who can say for certain what " law " means here ? It may mean the whole discipline of the Church re- garding baptism and its administration, or it may mean the same as " law of the symbol " above referred to — or it may bear any one of several other possible meanings. " I conceive," are the words of Swainson, the first word ' law ' represents what Tertullian calls the rule of faith " (p. 43). Now, everybody to day takes Tertullian's Rule of Faith to be the Symbol. So much for the conjectures of historical criti- cism. When men leave the beaten path of Catholic tradition, and try to make their way by the feeble and fitful light of individual 274 OF THE APOSTLEg. reason, they do but grope about in the dark and guess at the trath. The ground to be gone over in the quest of the Symbol is very uncertain and difficult ground. AVith Faith to light one's steps, and by following the foot- prints of Tradition, one may hope to find one's way. Without such help as this, one is as apt to go astray as is the traveler who has to make his way at night and alone in a trackless wilderness. yllli ^^ V. But St. Cyril of Jerusalem • Light and and St. Isidore are said to be l^^^^!"^^].. " decisive witnesses " to the distinction in question. Of St. Cyril and his witness I am not in position to say anything. But perhaps it will not be unfair to judge his testimony by that of the Saint who is bracketed with him. Swainson cites St. Isidore " to show that early in the seventh century a distinction was made between the Symbol and a Rule of Faith," and tlien passes on to the consideration of his subject, the 275 THE SYMBOL origin of the Creed, to wit, " with the assist- ance of the light which " ' ■) said distinction " pours forth " (p. 10). Bat if the light be darkness, how great is the darkness ! It is clear from St. Isidore's words and the descrip- tion he gives of the so-called " Rule of Faith," that it is not at all a definite formulary.' In fact it is more than doubtful whether the title of the chapter in which he treats of it, " De Regula Fidei," is the Saint's own : it is more likely the editor's. St. Isidore himself speaks of what he calls " after the Symbol of the Apostles, the most certain faith which our doctors have handed on," and at the end says : " This is the Catholic tradition of the Faith in its true integrity." A glance at the con- tents of this chapter is enough to show that what St. Isidore presents is a summary of the traditional teaching of the Church as set forth by the Fathers, and especially by St. Augus- tine. Among the items of this " most certain faith " we find, " And that the origin of the soul is uncertain." St. Augustine had so » De Ecd. Offlciia, c. 24 (Migne, torn. 80, eols. 817, 818, 819, 820). 276 OF THE APOSTL ES. ruled it in his day.'<* Again, " That no one toy his own unaided power is incorporated in Christ," where we recognize once more St. Augustine's teaching against the Pelagians. In short, nothing can be plainer than that St. Isidore's " most certain faith " was not at all a definite formulary. Nor does it bear any but the remotest resemblance to the " Keryg- ma " of Origen, and the " Rule of Faith " to which TertuUian and Irenaeus so often ap- peal. It ill becomes Canon Swainson, there- fore, to rail at Pusey and Newman because of some trifling inaccuracies in translation, when he himself founds his spurious distinction be- tween the Symbol and the Rule of Faith, first of all, on what St. Isidore sets forth in this chapter. A man with half an eye, let alone a person of Swainson's perspicacity, might have seen that Isidore's " most certain faith " is but the Saint's own summary of what the Fathers teach. To have set it side by side with the MCf. Ep. 153, al. 7 (Op. Aug. torn. 2), where the Saint speaks of the origin of the soul as "involved in densest darkness " (n. 7), though he affirms the soul to be a created thing and immortal (lb.). Cf. also bis works passim. 377 THE SYMBOL Symbol as a distinct formulary and "Rule of Faith," was, if not consciously dishonest (which no one supposes), very uncritical of Swainson, very misleading, and very mis- chievous. VI. A Case of Felo de Se. We are further told that, " The Rule of Faith, as St. Irenaeus says, ( IV. 26, 4.) was committed to the Bishop* while the Creed was intended for the laity." " Turning to the passage in Irenseus to which the reference is given, we find what the Saint says to be that " those who have Church suc- cession from the Apostles . . . both guard that Faith of ours, the object of which is one God who made all things ; and increase that love which points to the Son of God, . . . and expound to us the Scriptures without any danger." If one brings to the reading of this passage a mind imbued with the preconceived idea that there is a distinction between the Creed and the Kerygma or Rule of Faith, he 11 The Dublin Review, Oct. 1888, p. 280. 378 OF THE APOSTLES. may possibly find evidence in it of the truth of the statement cited above. Otherwise he will discern in " that Faith of ours, the object of which is one God who made all things," a plain allusion to the Symbol, of which we have here the first article. But the whole matter may be cut short by a reductlo ad ahsurdum of the argument for the alleged distinction. On the preceding page '% Dom Gasquet had said ; "They— St. Irenieus, TertuUian, and Nova- tian — use a term for the Kerygma which we do not find in Scripture ; z«i"iv t/;? dAr/ .'>££'«?, < Retrula fidei' or 'veritatis.' But in comparing the passages I refer to, it will be seen that the same thing is intended by all these different phrases." Now, St. Irenaeus tells us ex- pressly that the Christian " receives by his baptism the unchangeable Rule of Faith." '^ If, then, the Symbol and Rule of Faith were not one and the same, and if it were to the Bishop only the latter was committed, it would follow that, according to Irenaeus, only Bishops were baptized in the early Church! Under- " lb. p. 279 w Bk. 1 ; c ; n. 1. 279 I THE SYMBOL stand what you will by ««'''"^ ^^i? aAij.9et'a9, it is certain, if Irenaeus is a trustwortty witness, that baptism bestowed it on believers, on lay- men, priest, md bishops. "And neither he who is altogether mighty in speeoh among those who preside in our Chu.ches, will utter anything different from this ; nor will he who is weak in discourse abate aught of the Tra- dition." '* And again. " This Taith such as have believed without letters, in our discourse indeed are barbarians, . . . but because of their faith are extremely wise, and plense God . . . And if any one should tell them of the inventions of the heretics, conversing in their language, presently they would shuo their ears, and think they could not fly far enough, not enduring so much as to he^r tne blasphemous talk. Thus by that old Tradition Apostolic, they admit not even to a passing glance of the mind any of their monstrous sayings." '^ What is this " old Tradition Apostolic " ? It is the Rule of Truth—" this rule " to which '' con- sent many nations of the barbarians, those I w Bk. 1 ; c. 10 ; n. 2. 15 Bk. 3 ; c. 4 ; n. 3. 380 % OF THE APOSTLES, mean who believe in Christ, having salvation written by the Spirit in their hearts, without paper and ink, and diligently keeping the old Tradition : who believe in one God the Framer of Heaven and Earth and of all things that are in them, by Christ Jesus the Son of God. Who for His surpassing love's sake towards His creatures, submitted to the birth which was to be of the Virgin, Himself by Himself unit- ing Man to God; who suifered also under Pontius Pilate, and rose again, and beino- re- ceived in brightness, will come in glory as the Saviour of them that are saved, ':nd the Judge of them that are judged, ana to send into eternal fire them that counterfeit the truth and despite His Father and H^s coming." '^ These passages serve to discredit utterly the distinc- tion which critics have sought to foist into Irenaeus, between a " Rule of Faith " alleged to be " committed to the F'shop " a.one, and a " Creed intended for the laity," wherein were not contained " the strictly theological portions of the former, which were directed against heresy." .renaeus himself disowns and spurns "lb. 281 THE SY5IB0L the spurious distinction, delivering the " rule " to men who receive it " without letters " and use it to some purpose, as he makes plain to us, against heresy. VII. The Rule AND Symbol One. Justly have the later critics con- cluded that the "Rule" of Ire- nseus and Tertullian is the " Sym- bol " of Rufinus and Augustine, which the latter also calls a " Rule." In form only do they differ ; in substance and meaning they are the same. Either the " Rule of Faith " is anoth; - name for the Creed in Tertullian and Ir^naeus, or these ancient writers lay a trap for the reader into which he cannot choose but walk. If xa'^w'j or " rule " means one thing when com- mitted to the keeping of the Bishop and another when delivered to the unlettered bar- barian — well, we ought to have been warned that it does, or a different word should have been used in the one case from what is used in the other. And, then, a " canon " or '* rule " is, by its very definition, fixed and unchanging in its sense and in its wording. But if you 282 OF THE APOSTLE S. apply this test to the formularies and frag- ments of formularies set forth in Ir. ajeus ami Tertullian, you will find not one canon or rule but many canons and many rules. And yet both IrenaBus and Tertulli; . emphatically de- clare their « Rule " to be " one " and " un- changeable." There is just one way out of this tangle, but they have strayed far from that way who make confusion worse con- founded by introducing a " Kerygma " or "Rule of Faith," distinct from the Creed but so nearly related to it that the plain man can- not for the life of him see where the distinc- tion comes in. The key to the whole situation is furnished by the Discipline of the Secret. Both Irenaeus and Tertullian are kept back from giving us the Creed in the very phrase by the prohibition against putting it in writing and the obligation of secrecy in regard to it. Neither of them tells the reader so in terms, but this only serves to hide more effectually the words and structure of their Symbol. On any other hypothesis, the reticence of those writers and the studied care with which they vary the unvarying Rule of the Faith is an 283 J! THE SYMBOL 1 P insoluble conundrum to be everlastingly given up. VIII. Corrobora- tive Proof But if ^'Kerygma," "Rule of Faith," and " Rule of Truth " are but different names for the same formulary, and if that formulary is the Creed or Symbol of the Apostles, the following passage, in which the learned English Benedictine sums up the observations of Probst upon the Apostolic Kerygma, furnishes strong corroborative evi- dence of the truth of the ancient Catholic tradition : "We find in the Acts several expositions of Christian doctrine, in the sermons of St. Peter and St. Paul (Acts ii, iii, iv, x, xvii), all re- markably alike, and covering the same ground as the Creed. This similarity arose, no doubt, from the requirements the Apostles had to meet. They had to testify to the Jews the Godhead, public life, death, and resurrection of our Lord, with their consequences — the res- urrection and judgment of all mankind ; and to these doctrines when preaching to the heathen, St. Paul had to prefix that God was 284 OF THE APOSTLES. the creator of heaven and earth. The simi- larity between these discourses extends, how- ever, to the language and turn of the sentences, as will to some extent appear when I presently compare the Creed with the New Testament, and as can be more completely seen by reading them together; and this fact suggests that there must have been an agreement among the Apostles as to the form as well as the matter of their teaching — an agreement reached, of course, before their dispersion. The same conclusion follows from a study of the several descriptions of the public teaching of the Church in the New lestament and Apostolic Fathers. Perhaps the most interesting is con- nected with the word xr^pu^ and its derivatives. It was evidently adopted from the Septuagint in order to claim for Christian teachers the in- fallibility belonging to the inspired prophets of the Old Law. St. Paul significantly con- nects the act of preaching with being sent, and in his OAvn case laid the Gospel which he preached privately before the heads of the Church in Jerusalem (Rom. x. II, 15 ; Gal. ii. 2). xripo^y again, is twice used by him in a manner which implies that it had acquired a definitft connotation at the time the Pastoral Epistles were written (1 Tim. i. 7 ; 2 Tim. i. 11). There is still more evidence that the S8ff THE SYMBOL word xiooriia gradually obtained a technical sense, in St Paul and the early Christian writers, for the defined and official teaching of the Church. This is inevitably obscured in the Latin and other versions, where "prae- dicatio," " preaching " has to do duty for the act of preaching as well as for the things preached, the matter of the doctrines taught by the Apostles. Probst avoids this ambiguity by using the word " Kerygma " wherever it is possible to do so. When this is done, the significance of the word comes out in such passages as — "the foolishness of the Kerygma" (1 Cor. i. 21) ; " that through me the Keryg- ma" might be fully proclaimed (2 Tim. iv. 17) ; " the Kerygma wherewith I was in- trusted" (Tit. i. 3)." IX. A little further on Dom Gas- ! ^ Spurious quet points out that, in frag- \.^^^:.. ments from the early Christian writers pre- served by Eusebius, the word is constantly used in the same sense, the most remarkable ins*^ance being a passage in Irenaeus where the *' tradition of the Apostles" is sharply distin- guished from the "Kerygma of the truth," 286 li OF THE APOSTLES . the distinction being that which obtains be- tween the whole and its part. He also cites Origen, De Princip., sect. 2, where we find the words : " Let the Kerygnia of the Church, dehvered by the order of succession from the Apostles, be observed." In this same place Origen gives a summary of the contents of this "Kerygma," reproduced in an earlier chapter of the present work,'^ which, as far as it goes, corresponds exactly to the Symbol of the Apostles. Thus Probst and Dom Gasquet '^ trace the " Kerygma " from the Apostles, its authors, down to Origen ; so far as its con- tents are made known to us, it tallies with the Creed ; according to the ancient tradition of the Church, the Creed was composed by the " Chap, v., Sect. IX. " Original research in historical fields nearer home has won for Dom Gasquet, now the Abbot Gasquet, merited distinction. To such research the two articles on the Creed, referred to above, while they bear the imprint of his scholarship, do not pretend. He trusted too implicitly his blind leaders, Probst and Swainson, and, of course, fell with them into the same pit. There has been altogether too much trusting to blind leaders by Catholic writers on this subject. Probst, in his turn, followed some " higher " critic than himself. "They are lifted up on high that they may be broken by a heavier fall." OQrV THE SYMBOL Apostles; yet these two Catholic writers set CLside that venerable tradition, admit and up- hold the Apo :*olic authorship of a " Kerygma," shrink from affirming the Apostolic authorship of the Creed. This is one of the absurd re- finements of a spurious criticism which arro- gates to itself the name, now of " higher," now of " historical," without any valid claim to either title. 388 OF THE APOSTLES. CHAPTER XI. MEETING OBJECTIONS. L Dr. Schaff Holds a Brief. At page 23 of the firs* volume of his Creeds of Christendom^^ Dr. SchafiE sums up the case against the Apostolic authorship of the Creed. " After having first been called in question by Laurentius Valla, Erasmus, Calvin, the apos- tolic origin," he tells us, " has been so clearly disproved long since by Vossius, Rivetus, Voe- tius, Usher, Bingham, Pearson, King, Walch, and other scholars, that it ought never to be seriously asserted again." The arguments which those critics have brought forward he finds " quite conclusive." Let us review them one by one : 1 Fourth Edition Revised and Enlarged (Harper & Brothers, Publishers, 1899). 19 289 l4 i THE SYMBOL 1. The intrinsic improbability of such a mechanical composition. It has no analogy in the history of symbols; even when com- posed by committees or synods, they are mainly the production of one mind. The Apostles' Creed is no piece of mosaic, but an organic unit, an instinctive work of art in the same sense as the Gloria hi Excelsis, the Te Deum, and the classical prayers and hymns of the Church. This objection strikes at the legend which assigi:s to each of the Apostles a distinct article as his contribution to the common Creed. As against the legend it has much weight, though it is not altogether conclusive ; for, after all, highly unlikely and out of keep- ing with analogy as the thing appears, no one can say that the S-mbol could not in fart have been composed in that way. But the legend, as has been pointed out elsewhere, is one thing; the tradition is quite another. And it is not to the credit of historical critic- ism that it should have bundled the two to- gether. The legend dates from the seventh or eighth century, and finds its fitting source in a sermon falsely attributed to St. Augustine; 390 OF THE APOSTL ES. the tradition, as has been shown in the course of this work, mounts up to the apostolic age. It is quite true, as Schaff says, or rather rea- sons out from analogy, that the Creed is " mainly the production of one mind," for the Apostles had but one mind in the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, who is the real Author of the Symbol. H r. 2. The silence of the Scrip- • The Fallacy tures. Some advocates indeed i ^'^^Su.ence pretend to find allusions to the • "• Creed in Paul's " analogy " or " proportion of faith," Rom. xii. 7 ; " the first principles of the oracles of God," Heb. v. 12; "the faith once delivered to the saints," Jude, ver. 3; and " the doctrine," 2 John, ver. lO ; but these passages can easily be explained without such assumption. 3. The silence of the Apostolic Fathers and all the ante-Nicene and Nicene Fathers and synods. Even the (Ecumenical Council of Nicaea knows nothing of a symbol of strictly apostolic composition, and would not have dared to supersede it by another. 291 .J THE SYMBOL 'li: These two objections grow out of the same root. They rest on the common basis of silence. Here, too, are lumped together, in most uncritical fashion, things that should have been kept carefully separate. We must distinguish the Creed and the tradition of its origin ; agai^, in the Creed itself, the doctrine and the form of words in which it is embodied. The ante-Nicene Fathers are not si'ent about the tradition. On the contrary, they affirm it, Irenrjus and Tertullian explicitly and repeat- edly, others, such as Clemen of Alexandria, equivalently and by implication. As for the Creed itself, it is true that no writer of the second or third century sets it before us in the very phrase. But Irenaeus and Tertullian give us the contents of it, article by article, in their own words, the one supplying what the other omits. Other writers, Hke the same Clement, allude to it and " attempt, while concealing yet to declare, and though hiding to manifest, and though silent to point out." Such silence as this is an eloquent silence, eloquent of affirma- tion, not of denial. It is a silence that says Yes, while seeming to say No. Such, too, is JJ92 OF THE APOSTLES. ilil! the silence of Scripture, so far forth as Scrip- ture IS silent. It is a silence that is sugo-estive suggestive of a settled policy followed from the hrst, a pohcy that was carried out by a rio-orous enforcement of the Discipline of the Secret. But Scripture is not silent as to the existence of the Creed. The point, however, has been tully dealt with elsewhere. Finally, nothing could be truer than that the Nicene Fathers would not have dared to supersede the A -.ostoHc Symbol by another. But what of that ? The Nicene Symbol is not " another " Symbol. It is still the same ancient formulary, with such added words as bring out more clearly and fully the true meaning of it. See Chap. V. Two More Worthless Pleas. in. 4. The variety in form of the various rules of faith in the ante- Nicene churches, and of the Apos tohc Symbol itself down to the eighth cen- tury. This fact is attested even by Rufinus who mentions the points in which the Creed of Aquileia differed from that of Rome, buch variations in the form of the Creed 293 ¥ THE SYMBOL forbid the supposition of any fixed system of words, recognized and received as the com- position of the Apostles ; for no one, surely, would have felt at liberty to alter any such normal scheme of faith (Dr. Nevin). This objection, too, has been anticipated. As for the sage observation of Dr. Nevin, the value of it may be gav ged by the fact that at the very time the whole Christian world recog- nized and received the Creed as the composition of the Apostles, not one only but many, whole Churches, indeed, felt at liberty to alter the form of it, and did alter it. They knew full well it was not the words that mattered but the meaning. To alter the wording or add to it was not to add to " the normal scheme of faith." 5. The fact that the Apostles' Creed never had any general currency in the East, where the Nicene Creed occupies its place, with an almost equal claim to apostolicity as far as the substance is concerned. The alleged " fact " has been shown to be a fiction. It is of the Nicene Creed Epiphanius says, "This Formula of Faith was handed down to us by the holy Apostles, and pre- 294 OF THE APOSTLES. scribed in the holy city by all th Bishops, in number three hundred and eighteen." ^ It would seem, after all, that it is to the arguments for the Apostolic origin of the Symbol the quality of conclusiveness belongs. *Ancor., 118. See Chap. V., Sect. XIIL 295 THE SYMBOL CHAPTER Xn. THE ARTICLES OF THE CREED. The OBJEcr OF OUR Faith. " Without faith," says St. Paul, " it is impossible to please God. For he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that seek after Him." — Heb. 11 : 6. Now the Creed is a " br viarium fidei," a sum- mary of the Frith. It must contain, there- fore, and set before us in a compendious form, the teachiajr of the Faith ibout God as He is in Himself, and about God as He is the re- warder of those who seek after Him, that is, about God in relation to us. God in Himself, as the object of our Faith, is One in Three, one God in three Persons, the Father, ihe Son, and the Holy Ghost. On tl is mystery of the Holy Trinity our Creed rests as on its foun 296 :i!Ji OF THE APOSTLES. dation. All that it contains beside, all that is built on this foundation, serves to define God as He is Jn relation to us, or, more properly speaking, to define the relation in which we stand to Him, for in Him is no real relation to aught that is outside of Himself. We, on the other hand, enter into relations with the three Persons of the Blessed Trinity ; with the First Person as our Creator, with the Second Person as our Redeemer, with the Third Person as our Paraclete, as the Spirit who guides us into the truth, frees us from our sins, and comforts us in this mortal life Avith the blessed hope of a glorious resurrection. All this is set forth in the twelve articles of the Creed. n. The Object OF OUR Faith. We understand by an " article of faith " a distinct point of revealed doctrine, an item of religious be- lief complete in itself, that is, not logically included in any other, at least so far as the reason of man can discern such inclusion. Thus "crucified under Pontius Pilate and buried " of the Old Roman Creed logically im- 297 r - 'III 1.1 3 « ii THE SYMBOL plied " suffered," and " died," neither of which additions, therefore, constitutes a new article of faith. Of such points of revealed doctrine there are twelve in the Apostles' Creed. Now as in Leo the Great's day it is duodecim apos- tolorum totidem signata sententiis. And each of ihe twelve embodies a revealed truth, a truth such as the reason of man could never have learned by its own unaided light. For faith, as St. Paul defines it, is " the foundation QjnoffTaffti'j of things hoped for, the assurance (ehyxoi) ' of things not seen. — Heb. 11 : 1. The formal object of Faith as of Hope is the un- seen, " for who hopeth," says the same Apostle, "for that which he seeth?" Rom. 8 : 24. " The unseen in the things of God " says St. Thomas,' "is the object of Faith. Hence wherever we find a thing that is in a special sense unseen there we distinguish a special article." 1 i^yxoi signifies that which gives assurance or produces conviction. The function of Faith is to produce convic- tion of the trutli of things tliat lie beyond the utmost reach of reason left to itself, i. e. acting in the order of nature. s 2a 2m q. 1 ; art. 6. 298 OF THE APOSTLES. III. ii : m The Unseen Element. The mystery of the Trinity, embodied in the first, second, and ninth articles of the Creed, is unseen in the most absolute sense. Not only is it be- yond the power of unaided reason to know that God is One in Three, but it is be- yond its power to understand this truth even after it has been made known by revelation. The same is to be jaid of the mystery of the Incarnation, set forth in the third article. But what of the fourth? Was the crucifixion, was the burial, of Christ unseen ? It would appear not. The whole tragic scene on Cal- vary had many witnesses. It is a fact of his- tory that Christ was crucified, and that his body was laid in the sepulchre. It is proved by documentary evidence like any other histo- rical fact. How, then, can it be of divine faith ? how can it be an article of the Creed ? It might be said that, while the crucifixion and burial were in themselves visible facts, the fact of the One crucified and buried being the Son of God was invisible. But this would be no 299 THE SYMBOL adequate solution of the difficulty, for our faith in the invisible fact in question is already im- pUed in our faith in the mystery of the Incar- nation. If the Son of God can be born of woman, He can die on a cross j»nd be buried, just as any mere man that is born of woman can. The unseen element of this article of the Cro'd is to be sought in the idea expressed by the word " buried." For " buried," as Rufinus pointed out so long ago, in his Commentary on the Symbol f logically, or, at any rate, theo- logically includes the " descent into hell," which found a place, even at that early day, in the Creed of the Church of Aquileia.^ Now, the fact of the existence of the disembodied spirits in Limbo, and the fact that the Soul of Christ went thither after its separation from the Body are in the strictest sense, unseen facts, which we know not by reason, nor on the testimony of men, but by revelation from God. The subject of the complex predicate "was crucified and buried " is "Jesus Christ," and Jesus Christ, as we are taught in the • " Vis tamea verbi eadem videtur in eo quod sepultus dicitur." lb. n. 18 (Migne, P. L. torn. 21). 300 .i-, Mr I TT OF THE APOSTLES . ^techism, had a body and soul like ours. We are, therefore, bound to believe that the entire Christ was " buried," His Body in the sepulchre, His Soul in the Limbo of the Fathers. Our Lord Himself, in the parable of Lazarus id the rich glutton, after saying of the latter that he " died and was buried," oasses right on to say in the next sentence, "and in hell he lifted up his eyes,"^ ,vhich can be understood only of the disembodied spirit. It IS instructive to note that the same word IS used in this passage of Luke and m the Creed to signify what we express 111 English by "buried." Li Luke it is -'^r- the Creed has -,^/.ra. it i, ^Iso instructive to note that, m the Canon of the Mas which is perhaps as old as the Creed itself, the resur- rection is spoken of as being « ab inferis " that is, from « hell " or the lower world, rather ^han from the sepulchre. The words run • "Ejusdem Christi Filii tui, Domini Nostri, tam beatae passionis, nee iion et ab inferis re- ' So the passage runs in the original Greek. The Donay 301 THE SYMBOL surrectionis, sed et in caelos gloriosae ascen- sionis — Of the so sacred passion of the same Christ Thy Son, our Lord, as well as of His resurrection from the lower world, and also of his glorious ascension into Heaven." IV. ■ I Four Other j A.nd now for the other articles. '...; The Resurrection was not only unseen of men but is a something that passes comprehension. The Ascension was visible in its first stage, on the Mount of Olives, but unseen even of those who stood there gazing upward, from the time that " the cloud received " Our Lord " out of their sight." — Acts. 1:9. It was " the two men " who "stood by them in white apparel," the Angels of God, to wit, who revealed to the men of Galilee that, " this Jesus was received up from " them " into heaven " and should " so come in like manner as " they had beheld " him going into heaven." The session " on the right hand of the Father " is veiled from mortal vision, as is the coming again *' to judge 302 OF THE APOSTLES. the Kving and the dead," which is foretold in the eighth article. The ninth article completes the statement of our faith in the mystery of the Holy Trinity. V. ;h H h Holy Church. Of the three remaining articles only one offers any difficulty on this score. The remission of sins and the resurrection of the body belong to an order of truths that are far beyond the ken of un- aided reason. But (and here is where the difficulty lies) the Church is visible, " a city set upon a hill." So it is. But so was the " Man Christ Jesus " visible, and yet He it is with whom the third article of the Creed is concerned. When Ptter said to the Mau who stood before him, "Thou art Clirist, the Son of the living God," he saw one thing, as St. Gregory puts it, and believed an- other. He saw One who " was found in fashion as a man," and believed Him to be God. And 80 it is with us in the case of the Church. We see one t^'*»g, we beli^ v*^ another. Indeed d03 i«^N THE SYMBOL " the holy Church " is, in the logical order, the first article of the Creed. We see the visible society which, from its centre in Rome, branches out into all the world,— "this broad fact of Catholicism, as real," aye, and as visible, " as the continent of America or the Milky Way ; " we believe it to be " the Church of the living God, which is the pillar and ground of the truth.'* In the Church, even as in her Founder, we distinguish the human element and the divine, the visible element and the invisible. It is the former that is prominently before our minds when we say "the holy Catholic Church ; " the latter when we add, " the com- munion of saints." 11 ; 1^ 1 V: VI. Two Cita- tions IN Point. This is what was in St. Augus- tine's mind when he prayed that exquisitely touching prayer, on the death of his mother: "And inspire, Lord my God, inspire Thy servants my brethren. Thy sons my masters, whom with voice, and heart, and pen I serve, that as many as shall 304 OF THE APOSTLES. read these Confessions may at Thy Altar re- member Monica, Thy handmaid, with Patri- cms, her sometime husband, by whose bodies Thou hast brought me into this life, how I know not. May they devoutly remember my parents in this transitory life, my brethren under Thee our Father in our Catholic Mother, my fellow-citizens in the eternal Jerusalem, which Thy pilgrim people sigh after from their going forth even unto their return thither." s But you are come to Mount Sion, and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusa- lem, and to the company of many thousands of Angels, and to the Church of the first- born who are written in the heavens, and to God the judge of all, and to the spirits of the just made perfect, and to Jesus the Mediator of the New Testament, and to the sjjrinkling of blood which speaketh better than that of ofAbeL—IL^h. 12. 6 Conf. Bk. 9. 20 305 t a •I i THE SYMBOL VII. The Drama OF Redemp- tion. What has been not inappropri- ately called the " Christological sec- tion " of the Creed,' from the second to the eighth article inclusive, embodies the great drama of the Redemption. The second article is in the nature of a prologue, the eighth an epilogue, while the intervening ones constitute the drama proper. It has five acts, the In- carnation, the Death and Burial, the Resurrec- tion, the Ascension, and the Session on the right hand of the Father. Most of its scenes are familiar to us in the mysteries of the Rosary. It was presented once for all on the world's stage, at Nazareth and Bethlehem, on Calvary, on the Mount of Olives, and is ever since re- hearsed on the altars of our churches in the Holy Mass. The Word, \^ho was " with God in the beginning," leaves His home in heaven, and presently on earth " is found in fashion as a man " ; goes down into the grave and even into hell ; rises from thence again ; goes up into heaven ; and once more is with God, " sitting on the right hand of the Father"; 306 OF THE APOSTLES . for He who was " born of the Holy Ghost and the Virgin Maiy " has won for Himself this place of pre-eminence. The stupendous drama has its catabasis and its anabasis, its coming down and its going up again. And the " de- scent into hell " is part of the catabasis.-* The anabasis begins to unfold itself on the morn- ing of the resurrection. vm. Here, then, is another reason j "^he Fourth why the '< descent into hell " must •....^!!"':''.^:.. be deemed part of the fourth article. The putting it in with the fifth is clean against the canons of dramatic art. This might not be a very serious m'atter by itself. B ut it gives added weight to theological and historical considera- tions. Theologically, as has been pointed out above, the addition is needed to bring out the full meaning of the fourth article. And to the fourth it belongs also on critical and historical grounds. "The oldest interpreters," says Harnack, " make descendit equivalent to sepul- 307 i CONTENTS. tus."^ The fourth article, therefore, is : " Suf- fered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and v/as buried. He descended into hell." The Soul of Christ was in hell before His Body was in the sepulchre. IX. Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier It is one of the commonplaces of Catholic theology that a spe- cial work is appropriated to each of the three Persons of the Blessed Trinity. To the Father is appropriated the work of creation, to the Son the work of redemption, to the Holy Ghost the work of sanctification. Now, the Symbol expresses our faith in each of the three Divine Persons, and in the work appropriated to each. Our faith in the Third Person is expressed in the ninth article, and our faith in the work that He has done, is « The Apostles' Creed, p. 88. The point was a moot one in the Middle Age, as appears from a passage in The Forvmla of Concord, Art. IX. *' It hath also been dis- puted," say the authors, " whether this article [the de- scent into hell] is to be referred to the passion, or to the glorious victory and triumpli of Christ." Cf. Schaff's Creeds of Christendom, Vol. III. p. 159. 308 OF THE APOSTL ES. doing, and is to do on the last day finds ex- pression in the three articles that follow. Our faith in the Second Person is embodied in the second and third articles, while the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh tell us what He has done or is doing, and the eighth foretells what He IS yet to do. Our faith in the First Feison ve profess in the opening article. it seems strange at first sight that a separate article is not given to the work appropriated to the Father. But when we look into the mjitter a little more closely, we see the reason for this. The work of creation, though it does involve the exercise of omnipotent power, lies, after all, in the order of nature, as it is by it that nature and nature's laws came into being. It is only facts of the supernatural order that can find a special place in the Creed. Again, Faith has for its formal object the unseen! But God the Creator is not unseen, "For the invisible things of Him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity ; so that they are without excuse, because, knowing God, 309 THE SYMBOL they glorified Him not as God, nor gave thanks."— Heb. 1 : 20-21. The word " al- mighty," therefore, which stood in the Creed from the first, and the addition " Creator of heaven and earth," serve but to mark off the First Person from the other two. They em- body no new revealed truth, no truth of revela- tion at all, in fact, save by way of preamble, and so do not constitute a separate article. X. The Seventh Article. One more point, touching tt ^ division of the Creed into articles? remains to be dealt with. The session on the right hand of the Father is to- day coupled with the ascension in the sixth article. All the ancient commentators on the Symbol, Cyril, Rufinus, Augustine, Peter Chrysologus, Maximus of Turin, make the Session a separate article, putting it in the seventh place. And surely this is a distinct point of revealed doctrine, a separate item of our belief, which should therefore form a dis- tinct article. It corresponds to the second 310 -» ••■■^ ' ' i !ii OF THE APOSTLES. article, in which the Word -is revealed ag rest- ing from eternity in the bosom of the Father • for here the Word-made-flesh rests on the right hand of the Father, after the battle with sm and death has been fought and won. The two articles which relate the story of the cata- basis, or exinanition, and the corresponding two that tell of the anabasis, or exaltation, come m between. I! I The Twelfth : Aio Last. XI. It. would seem that the s^'xth and seventh articles of the Old Roman Creed were fused into one in the Apos- tles' Creed as it stands to-day, in order to get " the life everlasting " by itself into the twelfth and last place. But « the life everlasting," is not m any of the creed-forms that are to be found in TertulKan or Irenseus, nor was it in the Old Roman Creed even in the time of St Leo the Great. Yet Leo's Creed comprises twelve articles ; it is duoclecim apostolorum totidem signata sententlis. One of two things, then : either a new article has been 311 ij ''' ii, THE SYMBOL added to the Creed, or the present division of it into articles is faulty. Will any one main- tain that the Apostles' Creed contains more than twelve articles ? If not, plain it is that " the life everlasting " is not at all the twelfth article, but only a gloss on " the resurrection of the flesh," which is the real twelfth article. XII. A Legend AND ITS SOITRCE. But how account for the pres- ent division, which has behind it quite a hoary past, and would be venerable were it possible for error ever to be- come venerable ? It would seem to have had its origin in a sermon on the Symbol falsely attributed to St. Augustine. St. Augustine's word has ever carried great weight, and down to a comparatively recent date, his word was understood to be pledged for the truth of what is now known to be a purely legendary account of how the Twelve Apostles composed the Creed. I transcribe the legend from the text hi Migne, omitting the comment interspersed with the words supposed to have been contrib- uted by each Apostle. The reader will see 31 5J OF THE APOSTLES. that the divisions of li.e Cr -d correspond ex- aetly to those that we have to-day ; On the tenth day after the ascension . . . the disciples composed the Symbol. Peter said: (1) "I believe in God the Father Al' mighty creator of heaven niid earth." Andrew said : (2) « And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord Janies said : (3) " Who was con- ceived of the Holy Ghost, and born of the Virgm Mary." John said : (4) "Suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. Thomas said: (5) "He de- scended into hell. The third day He arose again from the dead." James said : (6) " He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almightv." PhTlin said : ( " Thence He shall con^ to judge the ivnig and the dead." Bartholomew said : (8) «.L firUT t'fHoly Ghost." Matthew Baid: (9) "The holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints." Simon said : ( 10) " The remission of sins." Thaddaeus said: (11) / 1 9 w. Tr^^";?,^^'"" «{ tJ»« flesh." Mathias said : U^j Ihe life everlastinjr." ' » Sermon 240 (Migne, torn. 30). ii n 313 THE SYMBOL CHAPTER XIII. THE ADDITIONS TO THE CREED. I. The Apos- tles Creed AND THE Ro- man Symbol. In the second volume of his great work on the Apostles* Creed, Dr. Kattenbusch says em- phatically that the Received Text, which includes the additions made to the Old Roman Symbol, is not to be regarded as a new form.' Critical and historical considerations led the German investigator to this conclusion. The same conclusion has been reached in these pages, mainly on theological grounds. It re- mains to discuss these additions, which distin- guish our Apostles' Creed from the Old Ro- man Symbol. They are " Creator of heaven and earth," in the first article ; " conceived," in the third ; "suffered," " died," " descended »Cf. The Church Quarterly Review, Oct., 1902 ; p. 221. 314 OF THE APOSTLES. into heU," in the fourth; "God" and "Al- mighty," in the seventh; "Catholic" and '' communion of saints," in the tenth ; " and the life everlasting," in the twelfth. Self-Ex- plaining Ad- ditions. 11. The bulk of these additions are self-explaining. The first lays stress on the exercise of that al- mighty power which is appropriated to the Father. The Nicene Creed has it, as well as the Creed of Jerusalem. In Irenseus it appears as " framer of he-^ * : and earth," and in Ter- tullian as "make. le world." These, and phrases of Hke import, we may suppose to have been the watchwords of orthodox believers in their controversy with the Marcionites, who denied that Christ was the Sen of the Creator. In the course of time they would take the one stereotyped form that we are familiar with to- day. " Conceived," of the third article, " suf- fered" and "died," of the fourth, "God" and " Almighty," of the seventh, call for no special comment. The addition, " descended into hell," which first occurs in the Creed of 315 « M THE SY3IB0L Aquileia, was dealt with in the preceding chapter. There remain, " the communion of saintb," and " the life everlasting." The latter of the two is but a gloss on the "resurrection," of the twelfth article. St. Chrysostom and the author of the homily de Symh. ad Catech. tell us expressly that the words were added to define the meaning of that article. They do not occur in any of the forms cited by Tertullian or Irenseus. But they were part of the Eastern Creed from a very early time, how early we have no means of knowing. We find them in St. Cyril's Creed, and in the Creed of Marcellus, which is much older than Cyril's Creed. In the West, or at any rate in the Church of Car- thage, they seem to have crept into the Creed from the baptismal interrogatory. III. "^ mo? or i ^^"^ " communion of saints " is Saints. : ^ much later addition. It is first f«»»d in an exposition of the Svnbol byNicetas (?400 A. D.), and in the 31G OF THE AP0STLE8. Creed Of Faustus of Hiez, who flourished -n W during the latter half of the Hf th century N-cetas uses the words ia the traditional Cathohc sense. They serve but to unfold more fully the ulea contained in "the ho'y Church of the Old Roman Creed. The Cburch which IS so often spoken of by her Divme Founder as the Kingdom of God, or the Kingdom of Hea.en, is i„ the world, but not ot It. She knows no bo.uids of space or time ; she mocks at the barriers of the tomb. She figh s s-a and error here on earth, where now :^" '•»'•'%>•" P-'P"" -ay; "she comforts w h her suffrage those who " fast in peniten- hal fires; she is comforted in turn by those Who m heaven ever cleave to God." Such «u,e Catholic conception of the communion of samts : a bond which holds together all the children of God; a bond which Jeatl. does not sever, winch stretches into the unseen, which IS transfigured in the worhl of light, and unites eternally all of Christ's flock " i„ the fold upon the everlasting hills." II! IM 317 OF THE APOSTLES. IV. The Word "Catholic." The addition "Catholic" did not find its way into any West- ern Creed till well on in the fifth century. In the East, it was taken into the Creed at a much earlier date. It is in the Creed of Jerusalem, in that of the so-called Apostolic Constitu- tions, and was finally incorporated in what is known as the Nicene Creed. Many of the Eastern Churches being of Apostolic founda- tion, got the Creed immediately from one or other of the Apostles. But none of them, it would appear, kept it in the very phrase, with- out any addition whatever, as did the Apos- tolic Church of Rome. If we could only be quite sure that Marcellus of Ancyra gives us the ij)sissima verba of the Creed which he got from his "forefathers in God," we should be able to point to at least one Eastern Creed, and that the earliest known of formal Eastern Creeds, in which the word " Catholic " does not occur. But we cannot be sure of this ; for Marcellus was mainly concerned to set forth all the articles of his Baptismal 318 I. THE SYMBOI. Creed and would not be over solicitous abont reproducing the exact words. Even if he had learned from his forefathers in God to confess his faith m " the holy Catholic Church," he would feel that there was no great need of writing the word " Catholic " down, as being something that could be taken for granted And in fact, St. Augustine, in whose Creed the word found no place, does take it for granted, saying, " the holy Church, Catholic, of course."- The Symbol had long outlived it use as the Christian Watchword when Marcel- lus came to Rome, and the precise wording of Its several clauses was therefore a matter of much less moment. This serves, too, to ac- count tor the readiness with which the Creed of Marcellus was received and approved in the i-ast, a few years after, at the Council of Sardica,3 a tact which, in its turn, confirms ' De Fide et Symbolo, c. 101. understand t.at Mareel,:';;:!.^: ^t^Z^ ^ dee„,.d,t needful." a, he phrases it hin,self (Migr " p' of hi I: *'' ''r' *''^™« *« clear himself of he c ar Je of heresy brought against him by the Eusebians ^ THE SY MBOL the traditional Catholic view of the Nicene Creed as being but an elaborated form of the ancient Symbol of the Apostles, which existed from the first in the East as well as in the West. The " descent into hell " was not as yet in the Baptismal Creed of the East in the time of Marcellus, as Kufinus bears witness ; neither had " the communion of saints " been added at the time anywhere, whether in the East or in the West. But while Marcellus does not cite " Catholic," he does cite the only other notable addition to the Apostolic Symbol, namely, " the life everlasting." Perhaps, too, he may have omitted Catholic, supposing it to have been in the Creed of his baptism, because it was not so much part of the Symbol as part of the name of the Church, which it is not always needful to give in full. " Catholic Church " means neither more nor less to the Catholic than " Church," or the " holy Church " of the Old Roman Creed. 333 OF THE APOSTLES. V. The Name Catholic, And this brings us to another point, the use of "Catholic'-' with "Church " as the distinctive and peculiar name oi the religious society founded by Jesus Christ. We have seen that it was in the East the word first made its way into the Creed, at what time we know not. It is not a little significant that it is in the East, too, the time- honored appellation " Catholic Church "jnakes Its first appearance in written records. In the New Testament the one word " Church " is the name given to that visible organization of which Christ is the rounder and chief corner- stone, and in which Peter is by Christ's own act made the foundation and the key-bearer and given, not conjointly with the other Apostles only (Matt. 18 : 18), but by himself alone supreme power to bind and to loose (lb. 16 : 19). The reader is referred to the fol- lowing chapter for an account of the way the word Catholic would appear to have first come into use as the distinctive element in the name of the Church. It "was not intended," ob- 21 was 321 i 4 i ' Ui THE SYMBOL serves on this head the keenly critical Profes- sor McGifEert, "to mark the distinction be- tween the Church at large and the individ- ual church or congregation, for the latter mio-ht he as truly ^o-^">-^^-n as the former/ but rather apparently to indicate the universal purpose or significance of the Church. The Church was universal,, not simply because it was spread everywhere, but because it was for every one, am -3 belonged to and had a mean- ing for the whoie world." ^ To St. Ignatius, in whose writings the term Cathohc ftrst occurs, "Chui'ch" and " Catholic Church " mean one and the same thing. "Let no one do any- thing pertaining to the Church," he writes, " apart from the bishop ; let that be esteemed a sure Eucharist which is administered either by the bishop or by those to whom he has committed it. Where the bishop is seen, there let the body of believers be ; even as where Christ Jesus is, there is the CatholicChurch." ^ That the word Catholic was already used in « Cf . Ignatius, Smyrn. 8 ; Mart. Polyc. 16, 19. 6 The Apostles' Creed, p. 198. 6 Smyrn. 8. 333 OF THE APOSTLES . the first half of the second century without special reference to its meaning, and simply as a proper name, appears from a passage in the Ep^leofthe Church of Smyrna w'hichi wntten on occasion of the martyrdom of Poly, caq, It ,s related there how the holy Bishop and Martyr made mention in his prlyer-of the whole Catholic Church throughout the OI.C would be pleonastic, were it descriptive and not appellative, for its meaning is full' e^d by "whole" and "throughout thi ^-"''■t.on of the Apostolic authorship of the ».-»ol. Had not the Creed been composed hU some t.me ,n the second century" the Church would have been known in it from the first by her distinctive name. And as no hypothesis can withstand the shock of even one opposing fact, it also serves to overturn Pro essor McGiffert's theory of the later oriZ of the use of "Catholic "as an appellative 'Migne,P. G.,tom. 5. col. 1041. i| if ill, 023 i: I 3 ' THE SYMBOL VI. From AN Historical Point of View. The passage in which Professor McGiffert puts this theory for- ward must be cited in full. It is of especial value. It embodies the testimony of a witness who has gone into the original sources for his facts, and who looks at the matter from a purely historical point of view. He assures us that the word " Cath- olic " has been from a very early time " simply part of a title," the formal and distinctive part of the name of the historic Church of Christ. " As time passed and false teaching began to make trouble within the church and to re- quire the exclusion of individuals and bodies of Christians, the phrase >'«'>'"'>«'? ^xxXr^ma came to mean the true Christian church — the one only orthodox church — in distinction from all heret- ical and schismatical bodies which might call themselves churches, but whi'^h in the eyes of Christians in general were not really so. This meaning appears already in the Muratorian fragment, and is common from the third cen- tury on. (Cf. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catecketics, XVIII. 26.) This true Christian church being a particular visible organized institution, dis- 334 I OF THE APOSTLES. nrrfm ■'';■" <'">?'»^t!ft'''>«^ owning the name ot Christian and more or less K;m.l„.f„ * jn character, the phrase «».w4 SlZaM might be used, as it commonly was - fter tL a|ethatit:lr„tJ^j-^^^^^ wf reflecL'*"""'^ "'"'i"^^' ^^''» *''« was reflected upon and analyzed it was con, monly interpreted to mean exfsting evIryXe and to refer to the univei-sal spread of tl ! church over againso the local chamcter of I t otruf: fr'"^^^"'"^' f» instance t tee Donair BuVtlie''"-" ^"""o™^-^' think that th:'::i:d cfthi i *::ra:;:,:rr'ti:: versaiity ot the Church [that it was a,Ido,1 t„ the ««w in order to draw atll'on t„ tl ^ r^T^'ll °* "'" ^'»"^h is the thesis main! k^^H -K '^ T' "•'•''P'^'J' " i" anj o her of "r known Not. •"""' ^^ "'"^'' *''« <=''««"' Wets. Known. JNothingf more \vn« m^o^^ i, ^ooW,. alone. To read into the word « /I ot Its own [which Zahn does, T/^Ariicksff 335 THE SYMBOL the Apostles' Creed, p. 180] is not historically justified. It is simply part of a title, just as to-day ' The Catholic Church ' is the popular title of the Roman communion." — pp. 199- 200. VII. A Question OF Vital Moment. Here comes up a question that has greatly exercised the critics, a question, too, of vital moment. What did the expression " Catholic Church " stand for in the minds of the early Christians ? Harnack, who incidentally mentions the inter- esting fact that the addition of CathoHc was abolished by the Protestant Churches in Ger- many, under Luther, and replaced by Chris- tian, contends that " Originally it meant nothing more than the universal Church, the whole Christian community called of God on earth. The idea of applying it to the concrete, visible Church was not," he alleges, " yet, i. e. in the second century, thought of." * Zahn holds that in "its original meaning the word CathoHc re- • The Apostles' Creed (Tlie Nineieenth Century, July, 1893, p. 178). OF THE APOSTLES. minds us only of an attribute of the Church which contributes essentiaUy to make her an object of faith." FoUowing the received Prot- estant theory, he makes the Church of the Creed an invisible Church. But he admits that "another use of the words CathoHc Church developed itself in the second century side by side with the original one." Out of this use "arose the opposition of the one great Catholic Church and the smaller heretical communities, which » ^ertheless called them- selves Churches also, and were even so called occasionally by their opponents." This second use, however, he deems an « unfortunate mode of speech." ' The Anglican Swete combats this view which would make of the early Catholic Church " an invisible abstraction, real- ized by a mental process, but possessing as yet no tangible form." He points out that " this is true of the Church in the same sense as it is true of every world-wide society which cannot be presented to the eye in its completeness ; but it is no less true of the later Catholic Church than of its earliest beginnings. On • 27ie Articles 0/ tJie Apostles' Creed, p. 183. THE SYMBOL the other hand the units which compose the Catholic Church were as concrete and visible in the days of Ignatius as in those of Cyprian. When Ignatius argues that the Bishop is the centre of the particular Church, as Jesus Christ is of the whole Society, he certainly means by the Catholic Church the aggregate of all the Christian congregations, which were visible and concrete bodies." '° VIII. The Church One and Visible. To enter here into this question fully would carry us too far afield. Yet something must be said. It is obvious to remark, at the outset, that the " Catholic Church " of the sub-apostolic age is identical with the "holy Church" of the Creed and the « Church " of the New Testa- ment. The Faith of the sub-apostolic age is the Faith of the apostolic R^e and of the New Testament. Now, tlie Church of the New Testament is a visible Church, and it is one. Many local churches are mentioned, but one is w Tlie Apostles' Creed, p. 76. OF THE APOSTLES. the CWh which Christ founded. I„ the prophetical wntings of the Old Testament it is outhned as (1) oup « = k- j ., , . "th. P„J r L ' Kingdom" which the God of heavon shall set up, which shaU never be destroyed" (Dan. 2: 44); as (2) v>«.ble, aye, "the mountain of the Lord' (Is. 2 : 2) Christ Himself, the Pounder, al- my Church (Matt. 16 : 18) and " th^ « Church "(lb. 18: 17), never in ^e p. Ja, He means it plainly to be a visible Church « a city set upon a hill " (Matt. 5 : 14) ' He draws a sharp line of demarcation between it and the great invisible congregation of ai! be- hevers which mounts up to the beginning of the race when He says to Peter, V»Mt> rock wtll I build my Church (Matt. 16 • 18) And this IS the conception of the Church which prevaJed, too, in the sub^postolic time. Ignatius "means by the Catholic Church the aggregate of all the Christian congregations which were visible and concrete bodies j" thii « quite true, but it is only half of the truth. These v«,ble and concrete bodies ate no mere m THE SYMBOL ^ aggregate, but one great communion, one society, held together by a close organic bond. They coalesce into what the Saint calls " one body of His Church." " The institution of the Papacy and the Holy Spirit acting in and with the Apostles solved once for all and from the beginning what has been happily described as the problem of " throwing a net- wrrk of ecclesiastical organization over" all ncu ions " without its breaking along the lines of national cleavage." As a consequence of this the member who was cut off from the com- munion of one of those " Christian congrega- tions" was, by that very fact, cut off from the communion of all— of the Catholic Church, in short. Hence we find Ignatius saying, " All that are of God, and Jesus Christ, these are with the Bishop ; and all that shall repent and turn to the unity of the Church, these also shall be of God " (Phil. 3). Hence, when Marcion is cast out of the Church, in Pontus, he seeks in vain to gain admission into the Church in Rome. Hence, too, one of those "concrete and visible units " which composed the Church " Ad Sviyr. c. 1. 330 i; i OF THE APOSTLES. of Christ in the sub-apostolic age, can describe itself as *' the Catholic Church of Smyrna," " conscious of its organic connection with " that Church which is in each several place " ; '^ conscious of seeking " the union of the Church," and of having no part with those who "sever and distract Christ's great and glorious Body, and, as far as in them lies, make away with it." '^ To Zahn, in view of " the meaning of the word (Catholic) and of" what he conceives to have been " the original use of the term, it seems an absolute contradiction in terms to speak of the Bishop of the Catholic Church of Smyrna." '5 It could not so have seemed to those men of the sub-apostolic age, else they would never have used it. The usage is at least partly accounted for by the explanation given above. We reach the full explanation when we call to mind that " Catholic Church " is used in the same document as the distinctive name and title of the one true Church of II f:|i " Cf. Martyr. Polyc. 16 and 19. " IreiiBBUs, Adv. Haer. bk. 4 ; c. 33 : n. 8. " lb. n. 7. ^ Tlie Apostles' Creed, p. 183. 331 THE SYMBOL Christ. No congregation of the Nicolaits, or of the Valentinians that might then have ex- isted in Smyrna would dare call itself the " CathoUc Church." IX. i A Specious Objection. But here an objection must be met, which shall be stated at length in the words of Zahn : " If faith is a steadfast waiting for things hoped for and a proving of things not seen (Heb. 11 : 1), then the thought of primitive Christianity expressed in the words : / believe a Holy Cliiu'ch was very important. For in her being and in her essential character the Church is invisible, however visible and tan- gible her embodiments and her manifold modes of appearing may be. Without the indwelling Holy Spirit, whom we cannot see, the Church would be a corpse ; without the Christ who is ascended into heaven she would only be a trunk ; and again without the risen Christ as the corner and the key-stone on which her faithful ones, like Him, build themselves up as living stones, she would be a house of cards. Without those generations of the faithful, who have gone before, the Church at any moment, 332 OF THE APOSTLES. even without taking into account the divisions and the equal y unnatural alliances existing at the time, would be but a fragment. And not only would she be this, but she is in fact. I onP.1. l^^^ii?^'"''^"'^^^ ^" *^« h«Pe that one day all wiU be reunited, who belong to one another but are now separated, by time and place, by the imperfection of human knowl- edge, and by death ; and that all the children •. / M? ^^""^ ^"^^^ ^^^^^' perfected and re- united, will one day appear that which Christ would have them to be. Until the fulfiment ot this hope the Church is a mystery which I either beheve or, otherwise, do not possess.- Up. cit. p. 179. '^ And at page 184 : "It cannot be an article of faith to believe the palpable fact that the local communities, whose Bishops were a Polycarp or an August! me, possessed the same confessions as the large Christian communities of other towns and lands, and were in communion with them, while the same did not hold good of the followers of a JVlarcion or an Arius," The gist of this may be put briefly thus. Belief in the holy Church, or the holy Cath- olic Church, is part of the Creed and an article 333 THE SYMBOL of Faith ; therefore the Church is invisible. We must distinguish the sense of the conclusion. The Church, so far forth as it is an article of faith, is invisible ; this we grant. The Church, so far forth us it is a Society composed of a ruling and teaching authority and the multi- tude of believers in every land who hold the same Faith, is invisible ; this must be denied. Zahn's error on this head comes of his failing to distinguish the human element in the Church from the divine, the visible from the invisible. The self-same Church is at once visible and in- visible, visible in respect of her body, invisible in respect of her soul. Zahn all unconsciously brings his Protestant preconceptions to the study of this subject. But his treatment of it throughout is so reverent that it lends an added pathos to the last words of the first cita- tion given above. And one is glad to be able to believe that he belongs to what theologians have not inaptly named the " soul " of that one, holy. Catholic, and Apostolic Church with which he plainly feels himself not to be in visible communion. 334 OP THE APOSTLES. fl X. Zahn is "near the kingdom = A Divine of God" when he says that l^^^.^:!^'':... " without the indwelling Holy Spirit, whom we cannot see, the Church would be a corpse." Therefore it is a living body, and Kvmg because the Holy Spirit gives it life. And this life is visible, in the activities of a living body, the Catholic Church. To many it is an object of sight only. To others it is an object of both sight and faith. So was Jesus Christ on earth an object of sight to all, and of both sight and faith to « those who had eyes to see." He was an object of faith, even before He became invisible. It was not flesh and blood but the Father in Heaven that enabled Peter to believe in Him as the Son of God. For the same reason it is unnecessary to suppose the Church invisible in order to make it the object of an act of faith. By sight we see that the Church is alive. By faith we be- lieve that this life is divine, proceeding from the indwelling Holy Ghost and containing all the supernatural means of truth and grace. It 335 m I THE SYMBOL is only the Protestant preconceptions of Zahn which make him argue on the hypothesis that whatever is divine in the Church is necessarily invisible and that whatever is visible is neces- sarily humaij. Applied to Orr Lord this h3rpothesis results in a denial of His divinity. Applied to the Church considered as an object of faith it results in a denial of her visibility. The Protestant doctrine of the sacraments is an instance of the tendency to separate the divine from the visible, a tendency altogether foreign to the Catholic Church of the first age or of any age. XI. The Rohan Symbol UN- revised. There is one more point, wt 1» h may as well be dealt with before concluding the present chapter The text of the Old Roman Creed, which is the Apostolic Sjrmbol in its primitive form, is assumed in these pages to have remained un- changed till at r the fifth century. That the additions made since then have in no wise changed, but only unfolded, its meaning, has been, it is hoped, clearly shown in the course 336 II OF THE APOSTLES. of this work. But certain of the critics try to make out that a word was dropped from the first article of the Roman Creed and another added, m the course of the third oentmy. Zahn 18 of opinion that the form ran, during the second century, « I believe in one God, the Almighty." It would be tedious to enter hero upon the reasons which he brings forward in support of this theory. That the Roman Lhurch omitted the word "one" from her Creed to counteract the Unitarianism of Praxeas IS, on the face of it, utterly unlikely. This would have been not so much a confession of the Faith as a confession of weakness. Cei- tamly the burden of proof rests with him who asserts that the word « one " was at first in the Roman Creed, and it is no proof to show that It occurs m the creed-forms that are to be found in Irenaeus and Tertullian. Neither of these writers cites or pretends to cite the Creed word for word. And as the oneness of God was clearly implied in the first article, they would not scruple to set forth the idea ex- plicitly m their controversy with the dualists of their day. 23 337 THE SYMBOL When Leo the Great, in his letter to Flavian of Constantinople, declared, " All the Faithful profess to believe in God the Fatacr Almighty, and in Jesus Christ His Only Son," one of the Eutychians queried, '• Why did he not say in one God the Father, and in one Jesus, accord- ing to the decree of the Council of Nice ? " To thi. Vigilius of Thapsus was able to make the following reply : " But in Rome, even be- L.e the Nicene Council met, from the time of the Apostles onward, and under Celestine of blessed memory, . . . the Symbol was so given to the faithful ; nor does the wording matter so long as the sense remains unimpaired. This profession of the Faith, too, is more in accord with the words of Jesus Christ, where He says : You believe in God, believe in Me also (John 14 ; 1). He did not say in one God the Father, and in one Christ ; for who is there but knows that God the Father is one, and that His Son Jesus Christ is one ? " '^ This seems decisive of the matter. The Apostles would use the simpler form " God " rather than ^Def. Ep. S. Leonis Papce, n. 1 (Migne, P. L., torn. 62, col. 119). 338 ^^fmi. OFTHE APOSTLES. The Word "Fathkk." one God, the more so that the M.3ter, so far as His words have been embalmed in the Crospels, never uses the expression « one God " the Old Testament (Mark, 12 : 29), and even in his lastance " one " stands in the predicative, not m the attributive, relation to « God." XII. Neither does Zahn succeed in showing that "Father" was added to the primitive Creed. On the con- trary, in his attempt to show it, he does but contradict himself. At page 56, he con- siders It "as proved that the Greed of the Galhcan Church, the Churches of Asia Minor Lmcluding of course, that of Ephesus] ai.-i Africa, and also of the Roman Church, which was the mother of the African, ran thus durin,. the second century : " I believe in one God^ the Almighty." But at page 74 he tells us hat something more may be said with toler- able certainty about the contents of Justin's baptisma confession than that it contained the names of God the Father, Jesus Christ, and 339 THE SYMBOL the Holy Ghost in this order." If this is so, then the word "Father" was in the Creed, after all, during the second century, and the statement proved in the first citation is dis- proved in the second. And indeed the place of " Father " in the Creed was as secure from the first as that of Son and Holy Ghost. For the Creed, as Zahn himself maintains, is based on the baptismal formula, which runs " in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." xm. The Fosoet- PUL CErric. Had Zahn but kept in view the fact to which he himself so unequivocally bears witness at page 43, he would have seen that the formulary which he pieces together from second century writings is, and from the naiure of the case needs must be, conjectural, at least so far as the precise wording of it goes. For if " it is true that neither Irenaeus nor Tertullian has given the exact form of the rule of truth," being " kept back by the principle maintained for hundreds of years in the Church, that this 340 OF THE AP03TLEa . confession should not be written with pen and .nk, bat should be imprinted on the hfar" and We cannot ,n every case determine what be- longs to the formuk contained in the author's Horz Xfi T '' '"^ "^ ^''•'-' -p'-- and the „pp„., ,„„ ^j the time " ; what basis of s^Me fact . left us whereon to build a ce. tamty? Singular, isn ., it? the critics ahnost everyone note the fact that the early Chrirtkn wnters either are silent about the Symb^rTr thejr own to keep the uninitiated from learning the.r Watchword ;_they note the fact, I say! and the., proceed straightway to dogmatize about the ongin of this same Symbol,^a„d to determ.ne what the exact form and wording o? was at a tame when, „„ their own show,W they have no data whence they can reach a,^ certajn co«clus.on on the subject. Verily i„ th« „ the votary of historical criticism "like unto a man beholding his natural face in a nurror; for he beholdeth himself, and goeth away, and forthwith forgetteth what manner 341 THE SYMBOL of man he was " (James, 1 : 23, 24). Another signal instance of this fatal facility in forget- ting is furnished by Zahn at page 91, where he assumes that the words " of David's seed " found a place in the Creed known to St. Igna- tius. This assumption he bases on the fact that these words occur in the summary of " christological attributes " that Ignatius sets before us. Zahn again forgot what he had written at page 43. In order to imprint his words on the heart and memory of the reader they are once more cited here, and will serve to close this chapter. " It is true that neither Irenseus nor Tertullian has given the exact form of their rule of truth. They were kept back by the principle maintained for hundreds of years in the Church, that this confession should not be written with pen and ink, but should be imprinted on the heart and memory." 342 OFTHE APOSTLES. A Rrjected Hypothesis. CHAPTER XIV. THE NAME CATHOUC. I. ^fthe name Catholic Church in the first century all that writ- ten records enable us to say is that it wa^ already in use. The mention of it by St Ignatius m a way which supposes it to have been ah.e..ly well known proves this much; but there is no positive evidence of the way theappeUation first came to be used. Inquirers have therefore to resort to hypotheses, and of these there are three which claun to account for its origin. Some suggest that as the word « Church " was used sometimes to mean the whole Church and sometimes a particular clmrch, as that of Corinth, for instance, the word "Catholic" 343 "fm. THE SYMBOL was adopted to mark the distinction. The Rev. R. E. Bartlett, late Fellow of Oxford University says : " The Catholic Church meant originally the whole congregation of Christian people scat- tered throughout the world, as opposed to the smaller congregations of Christians dwelling in separate cities or meeting in a particular house." This hypothesis is excluded by the records of antiquity. It has been shown in the pre- ceding chapter that particular Churches were also called Catholic in the sub- Apostolic age. II. Another Hypothesis. Other writers suggest that the rise of heresies was the occasion of the Church being called Catholic, to distinguish her from the sects. St. Pacian, in a well known passage, puts forth this hypothesis, not because he thought it well founded, for his own opinion was that the word had a divine origin, but as a passing con- cession to his Novatian correspondent when 344 OF THE APOSTLES. some hypothesis became necessary in his ar- gument. There is a sense in which this hypt thesis may be well fonnded. Individual mem- bers may have adopted the name of the Church for themselves in this way. For some cen- tones they caUed themselves Christians: but when heretics persisted in claiming the Christ, mn name and it was found impossible to re- fuse It to any who were baptized and who pro- Church had ,n course of time, to adopt the name of the Church and call themselves Cath- oI.cs to mark the distinction between them- selves and heretics. But the word was applied to the Church first, and was apjlicable to the members only when it came into use as the proper name of the Chuich. As an explrna- called Cahohc the second hypothesis is but an improbable guess. It supposes that the argu- ment from universality was used commonly and with much public insistence against the sects at a time when the immediate dUcipIes of the Apostles wei^ still everywhere accessible, when all the Sees founded by the Apostles were still 345 li' :^i ■4 THE SYMBOL orthodox, and when the heresies to be opposed were the very same as those abeady expressly condemned by the Apostles. A name was undoubtedly needed to distinguish the Church from the sects, even if we cannot suppose that the argument from universality was much used against heretics at the time ; but if opposition to heresy had been the occasion of selecting a new name, the Church would have been called the Apostolic Church, not the Catholic Church, and the members Apostolics, not Catholics. For many years after the introduction of the Catholic name the common argument against heretics was ApostoHc tradition. III. Cathouo and Christian. Even as late as the fourth century St. Athanasius was able to use the foUowinff argfument : Formerly, when we were all united Christ- ians both in doctrine and name, Marcion be- came a heretic and was excommunicated, and those who sided with the Bishop thai had ex- pelled him retained the name of Christians, 346 OF THE APOSTLES . ManicWu., and' sln'^fc^"-. names to those who became^Theif dTscilT Ihese were named after *!.„ ir , "'*.<"P'e8. Basilidians, Mlnfohees and r"^*'*"**"'""'' wisB the rl*, iT • ' *"'' Simonians. Like- Fhry^a ^t'l^Z"^^'.'^'^ "''«'« from tus^" ' ^vt .^ ' • Novahans from Nova- Ateand^ ^rZZ m:m"'"^T' ''^*- denominated Arians AnT" *'"'*,?'»« "ere death, those tW =1 • '"'^. Alexander's successor A fir« • '" T""""'™ '"tt h« Sps 'as heiS'"'' ^'"^.^■^.^•'e'' other same z^ ':r zz^rt^'A^" caued Christmns m contradistinction to here- fed and ir°"*'^'i° ""PP"'* *'«'* t-o •"•»- ared and fifty years before this time the Church 1,^ ^<»aw. u«n. l,p. 308 (M a.„„„ OoU,nta,. 347 »- i A Mant- Nationed Church. needed to be called other than C»n >n contradistinction toheret.calbod.es? Or th^ individual members conld have so long r^ ^Td a name different from that of the TnL if both names had reference to the ^^rlg? The second hypotes« must be aUowed to go the vray of the first. IV. Hurter, in his Compendium Theologm, bases his definition of Catholicity on the second hypo- thesis, with the result that hU treatment of the S-t is vague and unsatisfactory Billot^ 1 h abler'theologian. returns to Ae t« ^itional definition, the one given by the bate- fwm of rCouncil of Trent, and the one iur St soma^terly awayby Ucord.re-h« Confh-mces. This definition is based, not on •' :■■ ,.• t:^„ tn the different sects, but on contradistinction to tne QiuB „. ^. the inclusion of di^^opU^^^ '^'T-'ln 1 s W the 'actual diffusion ird'oirUolicity must always be OF THE APOSTLES. ^^^w" "^u-^ '"* ^"«'"* " *» People withrn WWh of these divisions was the onginal occasion of the Church being caUed Cathohc? The third hypothesis is that the Church was so caUed as being a many-nationed Church in contradistinction to the Church of the Jews which consisted of only one nation. Ihe Fathers adduce the caUing of the Gen- tiles as prophesied by Isaias in confirmation of their Idea of Catholicity, when "the wolf shall dvreU with the lamb, and the leopard shall he down ^th the kid, and the calf and the young hon and the fatling together." That is, th! Gentile nations, despite their diversities of mce and civ^^ation, their opposing interests and natural jealousies, shall abide together in one Chinch. This is the true idea of Cath" acity. Its opposite is the idea that each na- chU ' "" " "P""'" "<•«?--»-* No one pretends that the Bishops met in the Cathohc. It must have come i„,,. „,e in some Cher way. Nor would there be any difficulty at aU if It were only a questiuu of an adjective i< THE SYMBOL denoting an essential quality of the Church. The existence of the quality would sufficiently account for the origin of the word. The words "holy" and " Apostolic " came natu- rally into use in this way. But the adoption of a name is a very different matter. It is the selection of one among several possible words. How did it happen that the same name was adopted everywhere ? There must have been some event or influence of general and impres- sive importance to lead all to concur in adopt- ing the same name. V. P^'^^oTisM : At the time of the Ascension Reuoion. *^6 Apostles had not received full instruction regarding the catholicity of the Church. Their last question to the Master implies their belief that Israel was to retain a privileged position in the King- dom of God. They asked whether He would then restore the Kingdom to Israel. His reply showed, indeed, that the Kingdom was to be universal j but as to the position of 350 OF THE APOSTLES. Israel in it, it was not for them to know the toes or moments which the Father had put in His own power. This reserve was part of a merciful plan, so to say, by which salvation was offered to the Jews without sudden shock to their keen sense of nationality. The tran- sition from the Jewish to the Christian Church was thus made gradual-the Kingdom came without observation. After tJie day of Pente- cost converts were received in large numbers: Dut m their case conversion did not involve separation from the Church of the Jews. This was a divine institution, and separation from it was not yet imposed as a duty. The converts as well as the Apostles continued to worship in the Temple and observe the Law of Moses Christian children were still circumcised. For several years the Apostles preached only to the children of the circumcision. To the Gentiles the Christian Church presented the appearance of a Jewish sect, and the faithful were caUed tralileans and Nazaienes. Without further direct mtervention of God it could never have become anything else. How were the Gentiles to be brought in ? The Apostles did not 351 THE SYMBOL know. We can scarcely imagine them even raising the question whether all nations were to be on a footing of equality in the Church. Patriotism and religion were so closely inter- woven in their minds that, in the absence of revelation, they would naturally infer that the Church was to be universal by a universal ex- tension of Jewish nationality, and that the Gen- tiles would have first to become Jews by being circumcised as a necessary step to their becom- ing Christians. But whatever the Apostles may have inferred, they came to no decision. They continued to evangelize the Jews until, after twelve years, God gave them new light through Peter, their Leader and Chief. VI. Jew AND Gentile. A scene fraught with signifi- cance is set before us in the tenth chapter of the Acts. By a heavenly ritual more expressive than words, and in- comparably more impressive, St. Peter is taught that the Law of Moses has ceased to bind, and that no man is henceforth to be d5ii OF THE APOSTLES w caUed common op unclean. He is th n led to receive a Gentile family into the Clmrch by baptis7ii, and without any rite connecting the converts with the Jewish nation. On return- ing to Jerusalem he finds the brethren greatly excited over the admission of Cornelius. Why was he not fii.it circumcised "> Was this the way to restore the KinoJom to («rael > Then Peter tells them of the revr-lation he has re- ceived, and many rejoice witJi imn that « in every nation he that feareth God and worketh justice IS acceptable to Him." The solution of the great problem is now given. To the Apostles at least it is clear that the universality of the Church involves the admission of other nations on equal terms with the Jews. vn. But the national sentiment ': A Crisis m is tenacious. The Christians l!"^^^"^: of Jerusalem soon lapsed into their former state of mind. The case of Cornelius, they told themselves, was an exception, a dis- pensation granted by God ; but the general 353 THE SYMBOL rule must be circumcision, after the manner of Moses, for Gentile converts. Then there came to them one day an item of news from Antioch which disturbed them more than the case of Cornelius. They were told that many Gentiles had been received there without circumcision, and that these actually called themselves Chris- tians, not IsraeUtes or Galileans, thus empha- sizing their independence of Israel. This time they concluded that something had to be done to counteract such anti-national proceedings, and some of them hastened to A?; I'>ch, with- out any commission from the Apostles, as St. James afterwards explained. At Antioch '^ Paul and Barnabas had no small contest with them." The peace of the Church demanded an immediate and final decision, and it was agreed to refer the question to the Apostles in Jerusalem. Thus, what is called the Council of Jerusalem was convened to define the nature of the Church's catholicity. Was the Church to embra,ce all nations on a footing of equality, or was she to embrace them through one privi- leged nation ? When all were assembled St. Peter made it clear that the case of Cornelius, 354 OF THE APOSTLES. instead of being an exception, gave a divine ruling for the admission of the Gentiles. St James added arguments from the Prophets confirmmg what Peter had related, "how God first visited to take of the Gentiles a people to His name, and suggested the form of decree by which the Church was freed forever from national resta-ictions in rehgion. There must have been many a sore heart among the Jewish Christians that day. To see their nation placed on a level with other nations in religion, and excluded from a position of privilege in the Kingdom of God, after having been the chosen people for so many centuries, must have made submission to the Apostolic decree a hard trial and left the Church, while those who remained faithful long retained a degree of antipathy to other nations, and insisted on certain Jewish practices which caused much friction in social intercourse (Gal. 2; 12). 855 THE SYMBOL vm. Tib Church Cathouc. Thus gradually did the Church emerge from the conflicts of the time as a society held together by a bond of religion superior to the divisions of nationhood. This was something the world had never seen before, and great was the admiration, and great the opposition, it excited. A many-na- tioned Church was as great a novelty to the Gentile as it was to the Jew. Each nation had a religion of its own, and a particular re- ligion was included in the very notion of nationality, in much the same way as each nation was supposed to have a particular lan- guage. *' Which in other generations was not known to the sons of men," says St. Paul, re- ferring to tliis very thing, namely, '• that the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs and of the same Body and co-partners of His promise in Christ Jesus by the Gospel." This " mystery," as he calls it, had been revealed to him as to the other Apostles, and he became its prophet. He had a formula of comprehension which he repeated everywhere, with slight variations, to 356 OF THE APOSTLES. convey the new and wonderful truth that the Church of Chnst is above national divisions, that one member of it cannot call another a foreigner with respect to religion, and that all nations when admitted are fellow-heirs and co-partners within the Church. With the great dividing line of nationality he sometimes enumerates the social divisions that naturally go with It, and declares that these too find roon in one Church. "Christ is our peace, who hath made both (Jew and Gentile) one." There is no distinction of the Jew and the Greek. « I„ one Spirit were we all baptized into one Body, ..hether Jews or Gentiles, whether bond (slave) or free." "There is neither Jew nor Greek ; there is neither bond nor free ; there is neither male nor female." There is neither Gentile nor Jew, eircum- eision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian nor Scyth- ian, bond nor free; but Christ is all and in an. Ihis was not merely the teaching that man should cultivate fellow feeling with man, despite all natural differences; but rather that Christ had done some great and wonderful thing to reconcile all those differences in one 357 THE SYMBOL Body. St. Paul was stating a marvellous fact visible to all, that a mauy-nationed Institution had, through Christ, come into existence, and this Institution he calls one Body. Hitherto the people of God, however wonderful in other respects, was but a nation among other nations. The Church of the Jews was national; the Church of Christ is — what ? A new word was needed to express the contrast, and the word Catholic was soon found. The events and the circumstances of the time made this char- acteristic of the Church more prominent and more impressive than any other. The con- tinual conflicts with the Jews and the Juda- izers ; the much-talked of Council of Jerusa- lem ; the novelty of a many-nationed Church ; the frequent preaching of it as such by the Apostles and their successors ; and the never- ending conflict between duty and inclination in those who admitted and admired the duty of unity, but still felt within themselves the work- ing of the old heathen or Jewish hatred of foreigners — all these things combined to give the word Catholic proper name. the prominence c* a 358 KIZMmMT OF THE APOSTLES. IX. True Com- prehensive- ness. The early Church was all-com- prehensive in respect of national divisions and also of the social divisions within each nation. Greek and Scy- thian, master and servant, high and low, rich and poor, male and female, were admitted without distinction and worshipped at the same alter. This comprehensiveness or catho- licity of the Church has reference to the natural divisions among men. It involves the duty of being liberal in the things that are ours, whether national or social, for the sake of unity n the things that are Christ's. The Church of the Apostles was liberal in matters national and social, but conservative and exclusive in matters of faith. Those who caused divisions in doctrine were marked persons and to be avoided. It is the fashion nowadays to honor the Catholic Name. Even the i-vangehcals are following at a distance the Anglican example of respect for antiquity. A nonconformist catechism published in Eng- land has questions and muwen regarding the 869 THE SYMBOL ho]y CathoUc Church of the ApostW Creed. This revived respect for the name does not yet inc ude a realizbg sense of the stern Scriptural reahty which the name connotes. To be Uberal m national and social relations is one of the difficult duties which CathoUcism imposes. To be Kberal in the things of Christ and thus make Christian unity of smaU account is a pnvilege to which the natural man thinks he has a right. He seeks to transfer compre- hensiveness from the natural sphere, where Scripture places it, to the supernatural sphere where Scripture forbids it. * 360 ^m'^^^m:^' APPENDIX. WESTERN CREEDS. Cbmed of Cod. Laud. (Bodl. Gr. 35). Creed of the Bangor Antipftonary dominutn nostrum d11 "" ®'"' "">«"«» „V, / " ^'x «^>. natnni de Marii\ uimne nasBiim onh p^.>*- •cod. arpo lAw. *COd. cneliH. *cod. rfsurrechoni*. 361 *cod. dfertem. APPENDIX. ad dexteram Dei Patris oranipotentis, ezinde uenturus* iudicare uiuos ac mortuos. Credo et in Spiritum Sanctum, Deuna oinnipoteutem, unam habentem substantiam cum Patre et Filio ; saucCam esse ecclesiaiu^ catholicam, abre- missa" peccatorum, sanctorum communionem''. carnis res- urrectionem ; credo uitam post mortem et uitam aeternam in gloria Christi. Haec omnia credo iu Deum. Amen. Creed of the C. C. C. MS. 468 (saec. xv,). HtcTsvot elf >?cdv naripa navTOKpdropa, itoit/t^v ovpavov koI y^f* Kai 'I^aoiiv Xpiarbv v'tbv avToi) t6v fiovoytvrj rbv Kvptov ^ftav, tov avX^^^ivra en irvevftarof dyiov, yevv^devra tK Mapt'ac 8 rw » irap- ^ivov, ira'96vTa ini IlovTiov HMtov, aravpu&ivra, ^aiidtrra *", Kal Toifivra, KareXddiiTa eif rd Karurara' ry rpiri) ^/iip^ avaoTavra and Tuv vcKpuv, dvf Xi?(5vra elf roiif ovpavovf, Kadt^d/ievov iv de^KJt ^eov narpbr ■iravTofwd/MV kKcii^ev ipxdfievov Kplvai ^uirrac Kal vEKpovCt iriareuu elf to ifvevfia to ayiov, ayiav ita^oXiK^' EKKA^aiav, ayiuit Koivtjvlav, if.oiv auapTtuv, aapKcx; avaoTaatv^ ^u^v aluvcov. ifi^v, [The above in a transliteration from the Roman charac- ters.] Creed of Ntcetas. (saec. V.) Credo in Deum Patreiu omnipotentem, et in Filium eius lesum Christum, nutum ex Spiritu Sancto et ex Maria uirgine, sub Pontio Pilato passumcruciiixum etmortuum. Tertia die resurrexit uiuus a mortuis, ascendit in caelos, sedet ad dexteram Dei Patris, inde uenturus iudicare uiuos et mortuos. Et iu Spiritum Sanctum, sanotam eoclesiam catholicam, communionem sanctorum, in remissionem peo- * cod. pylato. ' cod. diMcendit. ' cod. caelU. * cod. usnturum. * coA. acccUn'am. • cod. oAremisa. ' cod, com montonem. • cod. Mop«io« vid. • cod. ■nn' vld. *' cod. tatnma Tld. 3G2 APPENDIX , oatorum, huiua oarnis resurrect ionem. et in yitam aeter- Creed of Aquileia (Rufin. in symb.). (saec. iv.) «. ?n P^ "\'^V ^^''^ omuipotente, inuisibili et impassibili ; et in Christo lesu. unico FiUo eius domino nostro. Z natu^ es de Spxntu Sanoto ex Maria uirgine crucifixus u'b C" Pilato et Bepultus descendit in inferna. tertia die resur^ rexit a mortuis. asceudit in caelos. sedet ad dexteran, Pa- tns; inde uenturus est iudicare uiuos et mortuos. et in Spintu Sancto j sanctatn ecclesiam. remissionem peccato- rum, hums carnis resurrectionera. Creed of the Prymer (cent. xiv.). (Maskell, Monumenta ritualia, ii. 177.) I bileue in god. fadir almyati, makere of heuene and of erthe: and m iesu crist the sone of him. oure lord, ooa aloone: which is conceyued of the hooli gost: born of mane maiden : suffride passioun undir pounce pilat : cruci- fied deed, and biried : he wente doun to hellis : the thridde day he roos ajen fro deede : he stei^ to heuenes : he sittith on the ri3t syde of god the fadir almy3ti : thenus he is to come for to deme the quyke and deede. I bileue in the hooh goost: feith of hooli chirohe: commuaynge of Beyntis : for3yuenesse of synnes : aSenrisyng of fleish, and euerlastynge lyf. so be it. . ' " EASTERN CREEDS. Creed of Marcellus (Epiph. haer. Lxxn. 3). ^ Xliarevu ek ^edv wavro^pAropa, Kal elc Zptarb^ >l;,„ovu rdv vidv avrov rdu ^ovoyt^ ro. Kipcov ^^uv, Tov yiwrfihra tKn^eifxarof irwvmi Mafuat m na/^//^,Tdv tTri Jlovriov IIiUtov eravpu- vtifrntixix APPENDIX. ^tvra Kol ra^hra Ea2 tj" rpir^ ^uep^ hvnar&vra kK ruu vexpuVf 'kva^&vra elf roirf ohpavoiic Kal Ka&rjuevm) iv e^ig rov Jlarpd^, 'OiJei; IpX^fai KpivEiv Cuvrag xai veKpoti^' Kal f!f rb ayinv Hvevpa, 'Ayiav kKkh/aiav, 'A^temv d/tapriuv, lapKof avaoTociv, Zu^ aluviov. The Nicene Faith. Jlurrtvofiev eJf iva ^ebv naripa navroKpAropa, irAvruv oparav re Kal aopdruv nonjifjv k^I elf eva Kvpiov 'Itjoovv Xpiardv, rdv vidv rov i?foi>, yevvT/diiira, ek rov narpbi novoyevij, Tovriartv ex t^c oiiaiac rov iTarp6{, ^ebu ek ■&eov, ^6f ek ^rdg, '9ebi> aXr/&ivbi> ek ^eov a^Jldivov, yEvvr/^evra oh iroijj&ivra, 6/ioovawv ri^ irarpi, 6i* ov ra navra iyivETO rd re iv r<^ o'vpavt^ Kal ra iv ry yy' rbv 6i' ()//4f rotif av^pi>irov( Kai Jtd r^v finEripav aur^piav narE^^dvra Kal aapKu^ivra, ivav&puiriiaavra, iraddvra, Kol avaaravra ry rpiry ^uipgi, avEM&vra eif ovpavovc, Kal ipx^fiEvov Kplvai ^ovra£ Kal vEKpoi)^. Kal e(( rd ayiov nvEv/ta. Early Creed of Jerusalem. (Collected from Cyril. TluTTE()Ofiev elf iva ^eov iraripa navTOKpdropa, noitfri^ ovpavov Kal yvc, oparuv re navruv Kal aopdruv Kal cif iva Kvpiov 'I^aoiv Xpiardv, rbv vlov roii "•Eoii rbv /lovoysv^, rbv ek roii narpbf yEvvij^- fvra ^Eov a/.r?9y"v Kftb irdfruv rcjv aluvuv, 6i ov rd irdvra iytvero' pKuv rra Kal Evav&puiT^avTa, oravpui^tira Kal raipii^ra, dvaarmtra rj" rptry fjptp^, Kal avsMov^a eif Toif ovpavoii, kuI mMoavra e« 6':^i£>v mv irarp6^, Kal ip^d/XEVov iv 66^y Kplvat fuvraf Kbx Hfdpnf oi Ttjc f>aoikEi•. '-i . of m Holy Ghost, work and gifts of, c. 3, s. 2,; c. 13, s. 9. Ignatius Martyr, tessera of, c. 5, s 11 Incarnation, third art. of Cr c 13 " iBEN^us. St., Cr. of o 2 a a .' ' X X auth. of Cr., c. 3 si ' ' ^"^^^''^ ^'*"««« ^ ^P- ISIDORE OF SEVILLE, knd Rule of Faith, c. 10, s 5 373 * * INDEX. Jerome, St., and auth. of Cr., c. 1, s. 2, ; and motiva of omissions in Nicene Cr., c. 5, s. 1. Jerusaj^m, Mother Cliurchof, c. 2, s. 2 ; Cr. of an Eastern Cr., c. 5. Judgment, general, eight art. of Cr., c. 12, s. 7. Julius, Pope, c. 5, s. 6. Justinian, Emperor, and mathema, c. 8, s. 10. Justin Martyr, and S., c. 5, s. 11. John, Ap. , " teaching " of, c. 8, s. 10. K Kattenbusch, c. 6, 8. 10, and passim. Keryoma, and S., c. 10. Laity, and the "mysteries," Introduction, s. 7. Leo I., the Great, and auth. of S., c. 1, s "" "Life everlasting," addition to Cr., c. U, s. 11; gloss on the resurrection, lb. ; not in Cr., of St. Augustine, c. 4, s. 2. LooFS, Dr., c. 2. s. 2. Luther, c. 6, s. 13. Li.'jRGiCAL use of S. not the primary, c. 3, s. 2. M " Maker of Heaven and Earth," when added to Cr., o, 13, s. 2. Marcellus of Ancyra, Cr. of. Appendix; an Eastern Cr., 0. 5, s. 6. Marcion, of Pontus, c. 6. Maximus of Turin, St., c. 4, s. 3. Means, Stewart, c. 8, s. 1. Method of Historical Criticism, c. 2, s, 3. Method op Present Wovjk, lb. 374 INDEX. Milan, Cr. of, c. 4 s 2 Moitm, Do:i, c. i, s. i. ' N Nkwman. Cardinal, on D. of S. Introd -tin o meaning of " cannen," c 7 s i *'"' '' ® ' °« Nice, Council of, c. 5, s 1 ' NiCENE Cr., lb. NiCETAS. on " communion of saints " c n «,