PllQ // FACTS FOR MEGANTIC. ^ KVKRY VAjVTTOR SHOULD YOTh: ; AND VOTK ACCOHD- ING TO HIS OWN [K£h]RFj^TS.— (Phillips.) POLITICAL TRUTHS, — DRAWN FROM THE PAST, APPLICABLE IN THE PRESENT, IMPORTANT FOR THE FUTURE ! Ill a country like ours, where difFereni nations flow in, like streams into the vast Atlantic, and .tii€t:poijition of Minister of AffriciClJtit£b.'*»tiU: Ch^r enPriJCjier *>i Quebec is not in sympatny*with«ihe'*e^y atid'tft-ft'faaans that raised Hon. . / Mr. Mercier to power. No man, Liberal or Conservative, in our province, has had a purer record than Mr. Joly. If he differed from a friend upon a political issue, he differed honestly ; and although it would be most difficult to agree with his followers, yet as a man and a true gentle- man, he always commanded respect. He was and is what is called a Liberal in Lower Canadian politics ; but he never forgot, even in the midst of severe contests, and in the haze of conflict, his duty towards Canada. "When the nationl cry was raised, the cry which was antagonistic to the ideas of both Liberals and Conservatives, that cry which was but the pibroch of a certain clique or junto, he manfully stood up against it. True, it might send him into power ; yet he could not sacrifice the interests of the whole province for the sake of a few days or months of popularity and power. The Hon. H. J. Joly was an honored and respected member of the party. How to overthrow him, Mr. Mercier could not dream ; when, suddenly, the Regina incident flashed before him. In the gloomy shade of a gibbet he beheld a prospect of success. He seized the occasion, and grasping the opportunity he raised a cry ; he erected a plat- form upon which he knew the Hon. Mr. Joly could not conscientiously stand. The latter had either to become a party to national prejudices and religious bigotry, or else step down and give Mr. Mercier his place. Faithful to his principles, true to his party, and devoted to the union and peace of the country, in the following letter, Mr. Joly proclaimed his disapproval of the perni- cious principles sought to be sown in our bright land by the hand of demagogism. The following is from the last letter written by Hon. Mr. Joly, as a member of the Legis- lature, in 1885. It speaks for itself: — *' I am of opinion that the French-CanaMans have the free enjoyment of their rights. If they have not made a better use of them, they can blame no one but themselves. 1 cannot see how the formation of a new party, the National party, could better their position, but I think I can eee how it would endanger the future welfare of the Dominion. Bom and educated in France, T returned to (^anada, after leaving college, a thorough French- man In feeling. It used to be a subject of ileep a8U)nishment to me, whenever I heard my opponents in our electoral striigglea contest my right to represent French-Canadians in Parliament, on the ground that I could neither understand nor share their inmost feeling. "The day has arrived when I must admit that my opponents were not so far wrong on that point. I can neither understand nor share the feel- ings expressed with so much force by the great majority of the French- Canadians in the province and in this county. Disagreeing as I do with my constituents on such a point as this, I owe it to them to resign my seat, so as to allow the free exercise of their right to choose a ropresenta- tive who will sympathize with their feelings more fully than I can, and T send my resignation to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly. " It only remains for me to thank you, gentlemen, and all the electors of the county of Lotbini^re, for the great confidence shown me for so many years. With sincere wishes for your happiness and the welfare of otir country, " I remain, " Yours truly, "H. G. JoLV." Such were the sentiments of the once leader of the Liberal Party. With his departure from the political arena, the Liberal party ceased to exist in our Province ; it gave way to what was styled the National Party , and that faction found the exponent of its views and the mouthpiece of its principles (if principles they may be called) in the words of the present Premier of our Pro- vince, the Hon. Mr. Mercier. He not only expressed them on the Champ de Mars, he not only reiterated them throughout the whole Province, from end to end, but he even expressed them, not later than the 22nd of Novem- ber last in a most emphatic manner. In a letter addressed to Mr. U. Lemieux, se(^retary of the Club National, he said : — " I will never forget that it was in the halls of the Club Nationale, in the ii Ist of the intelligent and patriotic members of that organization, that -1 came to renew my force and courage for the electoral contests of 1882 and 1886; and that it is to tliis noble phalanx, asi well as to the National CoBservatives, rallied on the Champ de Mars in 1885, that we owe in a great degree the great victory of the 14th October, 1886, which was confirmed on the 26th of January, 1888. by the elect of the people. I^t us fiever forget tliese three memorable dates ! " First, the 22nd of November, 1885, when we all, Liberals and National Conservatives, deplored, on the Champ de Mars of Montreal, the martyr- dom of a French Metis sacrificed to the hate of the Oraogemen. "Second, the 14th of October, 1886, the day on which an indignant people chased from power those who had constituted themselves the valets of the executioners. '« Third, the 26th of January, 1887, the day on which the elect of a pa- triotic jieople ratified the verdict and created the National Government." Is that a sufficiently plain statement or not ? Do you require anything further to prove that Mr. Mercier, and his party, seek to carry the Province, to retain power, to hood-wink Megantic, to hoist their subservient henchmau upon an independent county, all for the sake of personal ambition and aggrandizement, at the expense of the electors and in despite of their principle ? It was on the 22nd November last that these lines were written. Has Mr. Mercier deviated from his recent record ? Look back to the same date, the 22nd November 1886, and read the following, carried amidst fanatical cheers, on the Champ de Mars : " Resolved, that it is desirable that all French " Canadians and those who sympathize with them should " unite in order to form a powerful party that will secure " for us respect and the free enjoyment of our rights." From that day till the present, the leader of the Quebec government has sought to create, throughout our Province, what he calls a National feeling, but which is truly the most anti-national conceivable. Our true nationality con- sists in the union of races and creeds upon our soil ; while he seeks to isolate one people and to place them in antagonism with the others. He and his followers care not how they may injure the future of their own people, care not how they may destroy their prospects, provided that the ruin of their race and the abolition of their creed, should serve as stepping-stones to elevate them to power. Why should we attack each other on account of religious or national differences ? Is a man to blame if he be born a Hindoo, an Irishman, a Chinee, an Englishman, an African or a Frenchman ? If we desire that others should respect the tenets of our creed, let us grant them the same concession ! Is that the course followed by the semi- patriotic, quasi-national clique that holds the reins of power in Quebec to-day. Mark these words of the Hon. Mr. Mercier, in his grand speech, delivered on the 10th April last, at the banquet given by the Club National at Windsor Hotel, Montreal : " I will add that a question of .4 ** religion, race, or education, aiFecting or likely to effect " the rights of the French or Catholic minority, would be " more justly regulated at London, even by a Tory Min- " ister, than at Ottawa by a Government of Orangemen." Shall we quote any more of Mr. Mercier's words — his appeals to fanatical prejudices, his efforts to rouse up the latent animosities of his own people ? Page after page might be cited ; but time presses, space forbids —however, read these words, spoken at Beauport, in the County of Quebec, during the last Federal election contest between Sir Adolphe Caron, Minister of Militia, and Mr. Martin, by Mr. Mercier, the leader of the Provincial Grovernment, and the patron of Col. Rhodes to-day : " This Railway (the C. C. P.) was built by Orangemen and for Orangemen." It is evident that these expressions are rank nonsense, yet they shew the feeling that exists in the mind of the Premier. These sentiments have not been expressed on any single occasion, nor does their expression bear the marks of a " slip of the tongue ;" even last October, during the recent contest in Montreai East, when Mr. Poirier, the inveterate enemy of Mr. Chapleau. and Mr. Lepine, the labor candidate, met on the political arena — Mr. Mercier cast his weight in the balance for Mr. Poirier, and there and then, going directly against his professed desire to aid the laborer, he fought Mr. Lepine with all his energy and might. He t^ven went so far as to state in the St. James Hall, that the struggle was between French and English, and warned the French-Canadians that tiie fate of their nationality depended upon the result of the election. The election terminated, the result was the election of Mr. Lepine, and yet the nationality (French-Canadian) has by no means suffered. In fact, it has a stronger and more effective advocats to-day, than had Montreal East listened to the appeale of Mr. Mercier, and returned the partizan of rabid nationalism. Not only did Mr. Mercier, personally strive to stir up this wrong and anti-Canadian feeling, but the National press of Montreal and Quebec, strove, with all the power of vituperation that can bespatter the colums of a paper, to reiterate and promulgate those perni(;iou8 sentiments* During that very same election in Montreal East, La Patrie, the organ of Mr. Mercnor and the Liberal party, published the following, and let the ele(;tors of Megantic pay atten- tion and learn the It^sson it teach«>6 : — " There \b no reaHon to be surprised that tliose Kni^li/sh should have changed facte towards tlie Liberal party since the Kiel ai^itatlon. Never do they participate in our opinions or. sentiments. They were our aUies, but not our brothers nor on r frt