IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) II 1.1 11.25 u m Sf U£ 12.0 ^1^ 6" Photographic .Sciences Corporation 23 WIST MAIN STRilT WIBSTIR.N.Y. I4SM (716) 872-4503 '^ ■^^ « ? ji (moaning "CON- TINUED"), or tha symbol V (moaning "END"), whichavar appliaa. Mapa. platas. charts, ate. may ba filmad at diffarant raduction ratios. Thoaa too larga to ba antiraly includad in ona axposura ara filmad baginning in tha uppar laft hand comar. laft to right and top to bottom, as many framas as raquirad. Tha following diagrama lllustrata tha mathod: L axam&laira film* fut raproduit grtca A la g^nirositA da: Archival nationalat da QuMmg, Quftbac, Qu4bac. Las imagas suivantas ont *t« raproduitas avac la plus grand soin, compta tanu da la condition at da la nattat* da I'axamplaira film«. at an conformity avac laa conditions du contrst da fllmaga. Laa axamplalras orlginaux dont la couvartura w papiar ast ImprimAa sont fllm«s sn commandant par la pramiar plat at an. tarminant soit par la darniAra paga qui comporta una amprainta d'imprasslon ou d'illustration. soit par la sacond plat, salon la caa. Tous laa autras axamplairas orlginaux sont filmAs 9n commanqant par la pramiAra paga qui comporta una amprainta d'impraasion ou d'illustration at an tarminant par la darnlAra paga qui comporta una talla amprainta. Un das symbolaa suivants spparaftre sur la darnlAra imaga da c laqua microficha. salon la cas: la symbola — » signifia "A SUiVRE", la symbols V signifia "FIN". Las cartas, planchas. tablaaux. ate. pauvant «tra filmte A das taux da rMuction diff^rants. Lorsqua la documant ast trap grand pour Atra raproduit •n un saul clichA. il ast film* A partir da I'angia sup«riaur gaucha. da gaucha A droita, at da haut an baa. •t% pranant la ncmbra d'imagas nicassaira. Las diagrammas suivants illuatrant la mAthoda. D 22t 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 •( so 00 '30 ^ -yim. I .i THE BROTHERS D'A M U R S by JAMES H A N N A Y From Volume One^ f^umher One New BpumiHck Magazine 18 9 8 TUf HKSr 1R1;N\|| SKTTI.KKS on the ST. JOHN RIVhR. Mosl peoplo ill Nou- flninswiclc. when they speak of the first settlers on the River St. John refer to the l.oyalists who came here in 178^;, or to the New Knjj- land n-,.-n who settled at Mauj^-erviile and Sheffield twenty years earlier. l/ittle is ever said, because but little is Uiiown, of those Kreiich inhabitants of the Si. John river who were living- on its banks a full century before the en» of the Loyalists, and of whom we obtain very lleetinir and uncertain glimpses in the official de- spatches sent by the commandants of .A.cadia to the French j,-^overiunent. Vet these people cannot but be interesting- to us who now inhabit the land which they made their home, and if the wliole story of their trials and toils coi-ld be told we would no doubt find it as full 26 THE NEW BRUNSWICK MAGAZINE. of romance as the world has found the story of Evange- line, as related by America's greatest poet. Unfortu- ately, there is no possibility of going into such details with regard to the early French settlers of the St. John as the poet was able to evolve from his imagination with reference to the fictitious heroine of the Acadian exile. Yet, enough can be gathered from the records of that time to give us a fairly accurate idea of the manner of men who were living on this great river, amidst the vast Acadian wilderness, two hundred years ago. In 1670 Acadia, which had been seized by the Eng- lish in 1654, was restored to the French under the terms of the treaty of Breda, and the Chevalier de Grand Fontaine became governor of the colony. The English had held Acadia for sixteen years, yet they had done nothing to increase the number of its inhabitants, and »'hen their fishing establishments were broken up and their forts surrendered to the French, no traces of their occupation remained, with the exception of the fort at Jemseg which they had built, and which was nothing more than a post for trading with the Indians. Fort Jemseg stood on the east side of the St. John river, and just south of the entrance to Grand Uke. It was 120 feet long by 90 wide, enclosed by pickets 18 feet in height. On it were mounted four small guns, and within it was a house for the garrison 60 ft. by 30. Old Fort Utour, at the mouth of the river> was then in ruins, and in 1670 there does not appear to have been a single settler, French or English, on the banks of the St. John from the Bay of Fundy to the river's source. Rich as the territory was in every natural resource, its very vastness and the gloom of the impenetrable forest which shaded the waters of the great river seem to have deterred the humble tiller of the soil from seeking a home there. The great solitude was only broken by the passing of the canoe of the savage or the WHERE STOOD FORT LATOUR? 37 movement of the wild animals of the wooded wilder* ness. The commandant on the St. John river in 1670 was Pierre de Joibert, seigneur de Soulanges and Marson, an officer in the French army who had married a daughter of Chartier de Lotbiniere, who had been attorney general of New France. Joibert, although he lived but eight years in Acadia, for he died in 1678, has substantial claims to recognition as an historical figure for he was the father of Elizabeth Joibert, who was born in old Fort Latour in 1673, and who became the wife of the Marquis de Vaudreuil, governor general of Canada, and the mother of the second Marquis de Vaudreuil who was the last French governor of Canada. Joibert seems to have wis! ed to become an Acadian seigneur, and he was the first grantee of territory in that part of Acadia now known as New Brunswick, under the terms of the edict made by Louis XIV. on the 20th May 1676. This document authorized Count Frontenac, the governor general, to grant lands in New France, on condition that they should be cleared within six years. Such a conaition was impossible of fulfilment, for the grants were too large to be cleared within the time specified unless the grantees had been able to place a host of tenants upon them. On the 1 2th Oct. 1676, Joibert, who is described in the docu- ment as major of Pentagoet (Penobscot) and command- ant of the forts of Gemisick (Jemseg) and the river St. John, received a grant of a seignory called Nachouac, to be hereafter called Soulanges, fifteen leagues from Gemisick, tviro leagues front on each side of the St. John River, and two league -j deep inland. This grant which contained upwards or 46,000 acres of land, em- braced not only the territory occupied by Mr. Gibson's town of Marysville, but also the site of Fredericton, St. Mary's and Gibson, so that if Joibert's heirs could lay a8 THE NEW BRUNSWICK MAGAZINE. claim to it now they would be multi-millionaires. Four days after the issue of this grant, Joibert obtained a second concession granting him the house or fort of Gemisick, with a league on each side of the fort, mak- ing two leagues front on the river and two leagues in depth inland. This second grant was just one half the size of the first, yet it formed a noble domain and in- cluded a fort which might "easily have been made a formidable place of strength. When Joibert died in 1678 it doe;? not appear that he had done anything to improve or settle the valuable territory which had been granted to him by the French king. His widow and her children returned to Canada, and we hear nothing more of her in connexion with the affairs of Acadia until i6i)i, when she received a grant of land on the River St. John of four leagues in front on the river and two lea^'-ues in depth, and opposite the grant of M. de Chauffours (called Jemseck) the centre of the grant eing opposite the house at Jemseck. This document shows that the grants to Joibert had been escheated or lapsed, and that the territory they em- braced had been regrantcd to other persons. The new grant to the widow was probably intended to compen- sate her in some measure for the loss of the land granted to her husband, but it does not appear that she ever occupied it or that she was able to sell it to a good purchaser. Land was then too easily obtained from the government to be of much value as a saleable com- modity when in private hands. The Sieur de Chauffours who was in the occupation of the Jemseg territory in 1691 v.as one of four brothers who had come to Acadia from (Quebec in 16S4, or per- haps a year or two earlier. They were sons of Mathieu d' Amours, a native oi" Brittany who emigrated to Que- bec and became a member of the Governor's Council in 1663. He was created a n\ember of the Canadian WHERE STOOD FORT LATOUR? 39 Noblesse. From his position in the Council, d'Amours was naturally an influential personage, and, like many a modern public man, he used his power to promote the fortunes of his sons. They all received large grants of land in Acadia, and they all resided on the St. John River where they had very extensive possessions. Louis d'.Amours, who assumed the territorial name of Sieur des Chauffours had a grant of the Richibucto and Buctouche Rivers, but he afterwards became pos- sessed of the Jemseg seigniory which had been granted to Joibert. Rene d'Amours, Sieur de Clignacourt, in 1684, obtained a grant of land on the River St. John from Medoctec to the Longue Sault, two leagues in depth on each side. In the same year Mathieu d'Amours, Sieur de Freneuse, was granted the land along the River St. John between Gemesick and Nach- ouc, two lejigues deep on each side of the river. In 1695 Bernard d'Amours, Sieur de Plenne received a grant of the Kennebecasis River " with a le;vrue and a half on each side of the said river, by two '.jruesin depth, and the islands and islets adjucent. " Si < years earlier the same territory had been granted to Pierre Chesnet, Sieur du Breuil, a resident of Port Royal, but this grant seems to have lapsed because the conditions as to settlement had not been complied with. At all events Bernsu-d d'Amours got the territory which du Breuil had possessed and the latter did not come to this side of the Bay of Fundy. The four brothers d'Amours may be properly re- garded as the first settlers on the River St. John who were not officers of the government. Governor Ville- bon found them here when he came to Acadia in 1690, and he appears to have conceived a strong prejudice against them. Writing to the minister in Paris in 1695 he complains of the brothers d'Amours, whom he calls sot disants genteil hammes. He "^^ys.. — " Thev are four 30 THE NEW BRUNSWICK MAGAZINE. I'n number Hvinj: on the St. John River. They nre K.ven up to licentious„cs.s and independence for tenor welve v.- .rs the, have been here. They are disobed- ient and seditious and require to be watched." |„ an- other paper i, is stated of the d'Amours that "although y have va,t ^'rants in the finest parts of the cot:nr, v ey have hardly a place to lod,. in. They carry on ,;.; t llajre. keep no rattle, but li.o in traciin^^ uith ,|k- In- dmns and debauch a.on,. then. n,akin; lar ' p o s thereby, but injuring, the public j,'ood.- \ t.l la. we find V.„ebon a.ain u,' in^ to the n.i. il^ , ' : |.m,eslrauK .MiKae.'' says he... „o more reason r^ b satisfied u-ith the Sieurs d'A.n.nus t!,.-u, , p,.vio.slv had. The one that has come from I.'ranci has no't P eased me more than the o.hcr tuc Their n,inj, ar. V ol y p,.,ed by lon^ licentiousness, and the manner^ ^ w^ r i"T"T ""?"^ "" '"'^'""' '^"^' "->■ '"-t last year.-' '' " ' '"' ''^^ '"^^"- ''' •^'^^'^' '^^^'- It would not be c,uite fair to judge of the character of he d Amours brothers bythe.se statenv.nrs, althou-W, Go ernor V. lebo., doubtless made them in good faitl. h.n>.selt. The I-rench government encouraged the for- warding of con.plaints to France, not only against priv- ate parties but against their own officials; and the French archives are full of letters written by all .so -d conditions of men .^,ainst the governors, the jud" the priests and against each other. The d'Amours ^vere engaged m trading ^vith the Indians and this Ja! such conduct an infringement of the monopoly of the company which was supposed to control the trade of Acadia. But as this company did not provide a suf- ficient amount of goods and sold them at exorbitant ri u g sw « WHERE STOOD KORT LATOUR? 3' prices, tmarly every person in Aciutia was engaged in trading, or at all event.s, every person was accused ot it, even V'iHebon hinisell bcinj;' char^^cd with having' secret transactions with the Kii^'lish in tlie sale of liirs. Even the captains of tho men-of-war which arrived from France every year with supplio'; for the fort were engaffed in trade, for they brought out jfoods for the traders in Acadia who were ruiiuny' the conipany's business. Fortunately we are not without the means of cor- recting Villebon's stalenn.nt tiiat the d" Amours brothers had hardly a place to !odi,>-e in, kept nv) cattle and carried en no tillaj^c. In Au;,'usl i68i; a little English boy named John iJyles, thjn nine years old, wa;, fiikon priioner in an Indian raid a^^ainst I'otnaquid, in Maine, and carried to Acadia. He remained six years a tap- ive among the Indians of the Upper St. John, but in 1695 was sold as a slave to Louis d'Amours de Cliauf- fours, the oldest of the d'.Amours brothers, (lyles lived with this man for mure than three years, and served him so faithfully thai, at the end oi' that time, he ^jave him his freedom and sent him back to his people in New luii^land. S' < fiom having hardly a place to lodge in, Louis d'Amours at that time had quite an extensive establishment. His residence was at Jemseg on the east side ol' U:e St. John river and he seems to have lived in much comfort. Gyles, who published a narra- tive of his captivity many years afterwards, .says that he did a great trade with the Indians and kept a store of wiiich the English captive had charge while he lived there. He also possessed cattle and raised crops, and Gyles tnoulions particularly one very fine field of wheat of which the birds had made great havoc. Louis d'Amours was married to Margaret Guion, a native of Quebec, and they had two children when Gyles lived with them. This lady treated the poor English captive 3a THE NEW BRUNSWICK MA^AZ/NE - the rr.sj,.;^:z :T:;z?.:\r' '-^'^ theea«t .ide of the s7 lohn * ""*' ""*^ °" '" '695. but he ^ves us no d'^r , ' "'^'^ "* '^'^ ''«"'*« The fact that he^d Z^^^ ^.^r ''r ''''■ 'country, rather than in a pla " J "* '^''"""'^ fradin^^ would lead us to infe th«. h *^^""*"'^"» ''^r in agriculture. His Ju •"^*''/''«* f'* «"tra*fed largely the wife of Lou" dw'^T ''""''"• «-^^^^ children. Louise Gutnun I" T ^'^^ '^"^ '*— ' and for nearly teTvI ' f ^ ^''' '" '^'^^'«" '''^^^ory, -er .sent friJ^A^:^^::::':^::^ ^-^-^ - some reference to her llnfT "^ "°' '■'°'"«'n -re not always Xvu—ZtX'r T'"''^ was a sort of Acadian Cleopa^' who '"^ '^'"''"^"'^^ '"'•ning the foundations of the littl ^ "'^'' ""^^^■ mandant she ruined and 'h. P 'n °"^' ^"« ^«'"- »^«Pt in a continual state oJ f. ''''^'' *^'"°">' -- had parti^ans and Z:.t^7:j;Z''":''''' enemies, ^*" *« "nrelenting Rene d'Amours. Si^nr ,»« r-i- "PPMr lo have lived uoon it Z, uj "' ''"•^ """ m-ried Jeanne 1. BorgneTJld'T'" '""'«"• ■7'". '•<'» of scribes the 1* tbus* ■""" *""" '^"'""^ * <"- '•'enf*.. the ^e„u of ^1^^^''^' -"^"-^ i>™we::^srS^^fsnss;^ii=S!^i^^^ ] THE BROTHERS D'AMOURS. 35 lieatro)' my cattle. I don't suppose that such aa army comes here to destroy a few inhabitants, but to take the fort above us. I have shown kindness t(> the English captives, as we were capacitatod, and have bought two, of the Indians and sent them to Boston. We have one now with us, and he shall go also when a convenient opportunity presents, and he desires it." When I had done this, madaui said to ine. " Little English," [which was the familiar name she used to call me by,] " we have shown you kindness, and now it lies in your power to serve or disserve us, as you know where our goixls are hid in the woi>ds, and tliat monsieur is not home, t could have sent you to the fort and put you under a^nfinement, but my respect to jou and your assurance of lo\t to us have disposed me to confide in you, persuaded you will not hurt us or our affairs. And, now, if ye will not run away to the English, who are coming up the river, but serve out rest. I will acquaint monsieur of it on his return trom France which will be very pleasing to him; and I now give ray word, you shall have liberty to go to Boston on the first opportunity, if you desire, it or any other lavor in my p "« world-s trouble, ffd care. P "''hT''"" ''^^'"'^' '"= ""•other who had taken L ,'^.'"' f^""""'. ">e other Nashwaak, had all be- •'" "" ""■'"« »' P"" va.io„.for'hisg„<^;: wh"f ' "^ '"' '^"S"'" '"- were seized or ^atyld 'h " V'""' ""■■—. Indian war parties thai were mil, "'t"" '°""^ "« «sh settlements of wle VhusTr"' °" "" ^''^- war brings about renri^l. JTl ™'° *™"ght by -es.ruc.ionofiifea:;?™:;:^;'' """' """•' "■■"-- frcn,Fo;.tash:rTo^;;r°" ?"■-=" "- ^-•-" the river, on the Cal,! •! '""^ «' ">= ""»•* of - ori.nall^'^-r-r-^. w.ch .^d THE BROTHERS D'AMOURS. 37 in the summer of 1700 and his successor Brouillan, who arrived at St. John in the summer of the following year, resolved to abandon the f,/t there and remove the military establishment to Port Royal. This Was immediately done, and as a consequence the settlers on the St. John were left without protection. As the war between France and England was renewed in the ijpring of 1702, these unfortunate people had no re- source but to abandon their properties on the St. John and remove to Port Royal. By this time it appears that Margaret Guion, the wife of Louis d'Amours, was dead, for her sister, Madame Freneuse, had taken charge of her children and was providing for them. These children were indeed in a bad plight and were destined soon to be doubly orphaned. Their father was made prisoner by the English in 1703 and taken to Boston where he was confined in prison for more than two years. When he was liberated, under the terms of an exchange, and returned to Port Royal he was broken in health as in fortune and soon afterwards died. We learn this fact from an entry in the register of the parish of Port Royal recording the marriage of " Pierre de Morpain, commander of the Marquis de Beaupre, on 13th August, 1709, to Mdlle. Marie d'Amour de Chauffour, daughter of the late Louis d'Amour, ecuyer, and Sieur de Chauffour, and of the late dame Marguerite Guyon ". Madame Freneuse, who had not only her own large family to look after but also the children of her sister, appears to have removed to Port Royal about the time of the transfer of the garrison to that place. In 1 70 1 she was a petitioner to the French government for a pension on the ground of the death of her husband and the losses he had suffered by the English invasion. Two of her sons were at that time cadet-soldiers of the companies in the Port Royal garrison, so Madame 38 THE NEW BRUNSWICK MAGAZINE. Freneuse must then have been nearly forty. Yet she had capt.vated the too susceptible heart of M. de Bon . Ippet That r '' " I ""'^^ °' ^^^^'•'^- N- ^o.s it appear that Governor Brouillan was insensible to her biand.shments. for he shielded her in every possibllwav and defended her fron, her enemies. ThrPrench "v rnment encouraged what may be properly describe'd Is was a .spy on some one else. In November ,702 we da cVrJu bv" M r-^'T"'' complaining, of a scan- aa caused by Madame Freneuse and Bonaventure This story was repeated by others and tho r""'^«; For. R„,., .™„^,r„, n,!;, ; ; ',*;„r.:r;° the inf.nf , '703 Madame Freneu.se had a child, but the mfant was sp.nted away and kept at the residence Broudlan the governor, was. however, aware of 'the affa r, and so was one of the priests for the child IZ bapt.ed by the name of Antoine on the 7th Sept. ,70 he d h^ K '"/""--tmg: an humble and contrite spirit two most mfluentml men in the colony, the Governor and Bonaventure. made it uncomfortable for any ZZ who d d ,„ ^^^. ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^ ^^ y o letters m our archives is one from Pnntif «= veml '„ ' "" •■= "'"' ^=«'>'<' f«"" Bona, d L,T ° rr""' °' ""'"'"« ''^'— • Even M 1, : ^ ""«""" "' P"" Royl. and the Drin c pal man .n .h. colony, wa, ^ade.oUlize .he J„" of cfrend,„g a Wend of Bonaventu,., for in a letter to THE BROTHERS D'AMOURS. 39 the Minister he protests against his interdiction and at- tributes it to the fact that neither he nor his wife had visited Madame Freneuse. In the autumn of 1704, Madame Freneuse was sent by Governor Brourillan to the River St. John, but she soon returned, alleging that she could not live there because the place was deserted. Brouillan had been ordered to send her to Quebec, but he excused himself on the ground that he had no opportunity of doing so. A journey from Port Royal to Quebec was a serious matter in those days. For nearly a year the cause of all this trouble lived up the river, at a distance from Port Royal, at the house of an inhabitant, but in the autumn of 1705 she went to France. She did not remain there very long, for she was again at Port Royal in the summer of 1706, and was the subject of much correspondence. Subercase, who hud succeeded Brouillan as Governor, required iier to live at a distance from Port Royal, but she seems to have returned to it occasioniUly. It was not until the summer of 1708 that the instructions of the French government with regard to this remarkable woman were carried out and she was sent to Quebec. It might be supposed that this would be the last heard of Madame Freneuse in Acadia, for Quebec was a place which no person could leave without the con- sent of the Governor General. But this Acadian widow was quite irrepressible, and it would almost seem as if she had become as influential with the Quebec authori- ties as she was with the leading personages in Acadia. After the capture of Port Royal by the English in 1710 she turned up as an emissary of the French govern- ment, and the attempt which was made in the summer of 171 1 by the French inhabitants and Indians to re- capture that place was thought to be due to instructions she had brought from Canada. Major Paul Mascerene, n officer of the Annapolis garrison who afterwards 4» THE NE'.V BRUNSWICK MAGAZINE f« the fono,lVX„l'r m""? "" ' "• *""''P'"'»- Ah„ ..u. ^ reterence to Madame Freneuse *.".e. . certain woman by „^, • Mal'^p '"^•.°' '" "''-''-' *' '»"' — of ,he Bay of F„„jy ;„ \ g.^; J^"'^"' Pj*"-"-. "-^n.e from .he o.her ,id„ her «,„-;„ the CoId«.t part ^WnT' ^L °"" '" '•"'»" '"'« » '--^ ^ad. Reason to believe wa. Sent by Onlr, '''« ^he- occasion shouUl offeror endeavourin^t? ^"■' *" '^""' "^ °"' ^c-cret,. till indeed She .„ but too ..cty .ho.he cl"" ": ""' "' '""^ '^''""''>- '" ^" '^'^ -id that want of ,1. manner If nt^; ha;"'" T"'' '"'^^ " «"'• '^^ venturing all_for all to cross the B^r .k ""' ""^ '" '*"= E«'«'n.t> of that the rndians o, penobsco. -^e^/j^ ' t' """— ^'-^ 'i.ne of the year- come to try whether she could be aliu^ r f " ''"' ""' "''^ ^^ f^- ^ '" upon thi« received Very Kindl b S Ch ' H T. "^ ''^'"■"'"' *''« -» <^'red granted to her. ' ' *^'"*'- "°'"'y-and had the Liberty she archives of a! h "' , ""■ ^''•' ""= ''"'•'■ments in ,he ■ possession and more thn,f ^' * '^'■'"'•''' .o pass a.a, C^ .t"« ^Erarslr ^J''^ :?r;ro:;rratr, z ^-^^^^^ their oriaVnarhlr i^ ""' '''="'"""' '" Quebec, ve.:iri„.,,irwHr-rnr„^rr:;r."r'