IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) // '^ 10 ■- I.I 1.25 IM 12.5 5 '""= 1.4 1.6 6" — <^ / <^ ^ /a Wj^ ii;C Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WcBSTER.N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4S03 ^^ \ i\ V \ ^ tlie unhappy system which Mr. Darling has espoused. Popery moulds and uses its instruments, as best suits its own purposes, and too often themselves are unconscious of the very fact. I fllTst wish to draw your attention to the general scope of the Pastoral Letter. Mr. Darling, mind you, doe^ not endeavour to prove the truth or falsity of the doctrines and practices in question by the unerring standard of God's most holy word, but strives to show that the prayer, book affords him some gi'ound for the maintenance of his views, he urges you, in the last paragraph of his letter, " to reject all teachings and, opinions which are plainly contrary to those contained in the prdyer book." Now in this he opposes the very rule of faith of ouV Church, which, according to her sixth article, is this ; " Holy Scriptuife containeth all things necessary to salvation ; so that i!.ihat- ever is tfot read therein, nor may he proved thereby, is not to be i equired of any man, that it shall be believed as an article of the faith, or bo thought requisite or necess.iry to salvation." Now, my friends, you see'the Church of England speaks very differently from Mr. Darling ; 8h^ refers you to the bible, ho to the prayer book, which, admirable Mjfo^n the whole as it is, is still the composition of poor, weak, erring, sinful, creatures like ourselves. And do remember, the Church of England nowhere leads her people to suppose her infallible (tha Popish Church does) ; she says, in the nineteenth article, "The visible Church of Christ is a congregation of faithful men, in the which the pure v«>rd of God is preached, and the sacraments are duly ministered according to Christ's ordinance, in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same. As the Church of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, have erred; so also the Church of Rx>me hath erred, not only in their Ywrnrr and manner of coronionios, but also in matters of faith.4 N6w from the sixth and nineteenth articles, already quoted, • it musUf^ evident to every one that the bible and it alone can be the ruT^^offiiith of a Chuzch of England man ; tliat is the only fountain from which we ca^i hope to derive the truth. Using the quaint lan- guage of the fir;>t ii. !nily — "Let us diligently search for the well of life in the books of the Old and New Testament, and not run to the stinking puddles of men's traditions, devised by men's imagination, for our justification and salvation. For in holy scripture is fully con- . tained vhat 2ve our/ht to do, and what to eschew, what to believe, what to love, and what to look to at God's hands at length." But as Mr. iJarling has grievously misrepresented our articles and formularies, by giving them a Popish bearing, I will meet him on his own ground; and, as T hope, confirm you in the belief that our church, nourished by tlie blood of martyred men, who died protesting against the very errors Mr. Darling is endeavouring to pervert you to, has no leaning or kindness to that erroneous and cruel church which slew those veiy men. In the first place, the letter is addressed " to the members of the Catholic Church of England." When, my friends, a man professes to writer a letter in the English language, we naturally expect that he should use only sucli words as lie knows the meaning of. Now, Mr. Darling either knows the meaning of the word " catholic," or he does not ; if he does, which I cannot doubt, he assumes on your supposed igiiorance ; and if he does not, he assumes on his own ignorance ; for the above title is sheer nonsense. The word "catholic," derived from two Greek words, kata olos, means iiniversal ; and universal means 7\ot particular, but pervading or extending over the whole world, or (belonging to something in which every man is concerned ; for exam- ple, we say the wisdom and power and goodness of God are aniversal, because in every clime, in every situation, and in every production of tiie earth we see these qualities displayed. The Church of England, I need not tell you, is the aggregate of many thousaiids of congrega- tions in England, with ofTrthoots in other places; the whole united and ()')und together by llie thirty-nine articles. Thus we see the Church of England is the chui'ch of a peculiar locality. It is not the Church of France, it is not the Church of Russia, it is 7iot the Church of Hol- land ; it is therefore particular, and consequently not universal or catholic. It may be, and indeed is, part of Christ's universal churdi, but you very well know the part of a thing does not constitute the thing itself; in other words, the ^jar^ is not the lohole. Mr. Darling's letter is addressed " to tlie members of the universal particular church." Whether this phrase becomes a man who ought to be a scholar, I leave vou to judge. We see that, whatever were the peculiar gifts which Mr. Darling speaks of in page 3 of his Pastoral, as acquired at his ordination, those of writing the English language correctly, and, as we shall presently see, of quoting honestly, were not of the number. ,/«; *. In tlie letter addressed to you, the subject matter may be divided into an attack upon my principles, as he calls them, and a defence of Ills own. It would perhaps have been more consistent, in the first pl.ice, to have proved, if possible, his own views /mm theivord of Ood, before he had attempted to refute mine from the prayer hook; such at all events is the teaching of the Church of England, in her articles, homilies, and liturgy. She refers us, in all our doubts, to the Bible. ■^ > ** But anger has some claim to indulgence, and railing is usually a relief to the mind." Terbaps Mr. Darling has found relief from the experiment. However, let us pass to a review of the Pabtoral Letter in questiop and we shall hnd seventeen mis-statementa and false quotations; and so important are these latter, that they entirely alter the meaning intended to be conveyed. This is a serious cijarge; but you, yourselves, shall be the judges. That you may be enabled to do so fairly, you must, when reading this, liave Mr. Darling's letter at hand, as well as your prayer book, and, jf possible, the canons of 1603. The bible you need not heed, as that Viessed book is not, I presume, considered of any importance in doc- tfinal questions. We^are nut to seek God's teaching, but the church's ; a\j( least such I suppose is Mr. Darling's opinion, for in the whole of thiki gentleman's letter I believe there is only one quotation from it. T^rn, my friends, to the ordination service for priests, in the prayer book I the fourth <|uestion asked is, " Will you be ready, with all faithfi^ diligence, to banish and drive away all erroneous and strange doctri^s, contrary to Gocfs wordy Look to the second paragraph on the iitet page of Mr. Darling^s letter; and he says "it" (my letter to the yrotestants of Canada) "contains many erroneous and strange doctri^s, contrary to God's word and the teachings of his Church^ He thrrl'efore feels himself called upon to drive them away, according tohisT^olemn promise made at ordination. Now, Mr. Darling, nor any otw|f clergyman of the Church of England, ever made any such promise ; i^the teachings of the church is nowhere mentioned. Read the questi^^ihs over carefully, and especially the second, " Are you per- suaded tliiit the holy scriptures contain sufficiently all doctrine required of uecessi^ for eternal salvation through faith in Jesus Christ ? and are you deteflrnoined, out of the said scriptures^ to instruct the people committed to your charge., and to teach nothing as required of neces- sity to eternal" salvation hut that which you shall he persuaded may he concluded and proved hy the scriptures^ It is a pity that Mr. Darling, whose ordination vows are such a conscientious weight upon his mind, had not this-t)ne more prominently in his memory when he sat down and wrote hii^ pastoral letter ; for 1 would ask you, my friends, and I appeal to ^fe conscience of each one of you, has Mr. Darling taught you in )M letter from scripture, or has he not; and if not, has he fulfilled his ordination promise, of which he speaks so much about. Let lis pass to the first paragraph on the second page of Mr. Dar- ling's letter ; and I distinctly state that all that I subscribed to at ray ordination I can cordially and ex animo subscribe to now, and that " th<*Qoctrines (or articles) and formularies which are already in exis- ten(^, taken as a whole, are scriptul-al, and admirably adapted to the wajits and feelings of mankind." I have quoted the preceding from mfjprmer letter, as Mr. Darling frequently does so ; and as frequently, oncel^^xcepted, with an omission most important to ray meaning. Can this % any possibility be unintentional ? Mr/lDarling says it is a church principle, " that there cannot be in any oke place more than one branch of the true church, and that the branchfof the true church in this land is the United Church of England and Iceland." Where does the church say so ? No where. Does the bible 4ay this ? Most assuredly not. Only substitute " Popish prin-' ciple" for "Church principle," and "Church of Rome" for "Church <^ I f I I i I i \l s of Enf^land," in the preceding, and it will bo correctly worded, accord' ing to Mr. Darling's real meaning. But only cxaniino his method of j'.roving his asr^ertion. A few words taken from this, and a few words from that, and a few words from soinowlioro else, put those together according to the writer's viev.s, and, my friends, the prayer book, or any other book, even tlio bible, can be made to say any thing or no- thing, just as a man pleases ; cou])le with this the most painful mis- statements, and false or garbled quotations; and you have at one view llie way the Church of England is made responsible for Mr. Darling's church })rinciplcs. , IJut let me not fall into tliat gentleman's error of assorting without proving ; let us examine how he endeavours to prove the assertioi^i quoted in the preceding jiaragraph. After adducing the nineteenth article, he says: "Now, according to Christ's ordinance, his saora- ments must bo ministered by lawful bisho})s, priests, and deac9ns." Let mo ask, where in tlie bible is it related that Christ mad© suclt pretended ordinance. Where does the Church of England say any huch thing. Christ, my friends, made no such ordinance. 11^ says, "Do this in remembrance of me;" and " do ye, and make discij^les of all nations, baptizing them in the name of tlie Father, Son andlloly Ghost." But, more than this, Christ makes uo mention, of bifihops, priests, and deacons. Search the word of God, my friends^ ana see if these things bo so. Mr. Darling, continuing his argumoLy says ; " But the Churcli of England says, no man is a lawful bishop priest, or deacon, unless ordained by a bishop." The Church of JEngland says no such thing; how can any man assert she does ? ^e says, in tlio preface to the ordination service, that "No man shall l)e^ccounted or taken to be a lawful bishop, priest, or deacon, in the United Church of England and Ireland, or suffered to execute any of the said func- tions, except he bo called, tried, examined and admitted thereunto, according to the form hereafter following, r.r ]iath had formerly epis- copal consecration or ordination" in other v.'^rcis. And can any thing be plainer ? The ministers of the Church of England must be epis- copally ordained ; but no opinion is given or doctrine taught respect- ing the invalidity of the orders of non-episcopal churches. (See the twenty-third article of our church.) ^Ir. D. goes on to say : " and therefore those denominations whose ministers are not ordained by bishops cannot have the sacraments ministered according to Christ's ordinance, and consequently are not — according to the articles of the Church of England — visible churches of Christ." Turn to Jtjr. Dar- ling's letter and read this tissue of nonsense carefully, for wl^ich, by the bye, if done by a boy over twelv.e years old at any public school, he would run the risk of a severe flogging ; then read, my friends,^ the nineteenth, twenty-third, thirty-fourth and thirty-sixth Articles; and then pass an honest and unbiassed judgment, whether such unchristJ^u opinions are the doctrines of the Church of England. She says, at the conclusion of the thirty-fourth article, " Every particular or ngiional church hath authority to ordain, change and abolish, ceremdi^ies or rites of the church, ordained only by man's authority, so tljiit all tl)ings be done to edifying." Mr. Darling will not surely now tell us, with this article before our eyes, that episcoj^acy, however desirable and in accordance with primitive and universal custom, is essential to the validity of a church. ■"i '? Another inac-urate quotation, so inacciirnte as entirely to alter il« original meaning, \h in the uppor part of the third page of the Pas- toral Letter, where Mr. Darling Jisks, "Again, how did it happen that, 250 years ago, such a canon as this was passed by tne synod or con- vocation of the Church of England ? " Whosoever shall hereafter affirm or maintain that there are within this realm other meetings, assemblies, or congregations of the king's born subjects, that may rightly chpUenge to themselves the name of true and lawful churches, let him be excommunicated ; and not restored but by the archbishop, after his repentance and public revocation of such his wicked errort^." Now, my friends, Mr. Darling asserts this to be tlie eleventh canon of t603, and urges you to examine and judge for yourselves. I entreat yqu to do this. Respond to that gentleman's invitation. For, remem- belL this is not any mere doctrinal argument between Mr. Darling andi^myself, it is much more ; it is between truth and falsehood, be- tweelk the bible and the deceitful crafty system of Ignatius Loyola, between the commandments of God and the traditions of men, between Prote86^ntism and Popery. Now, let us read this eleventh canon (having obtained the churchwarden's permission, which seems first of all to he necessary by the Pastoral Letter), and we shall find it runt; thus tf" Whosoever shall hereafter affirm or maintain that there are withinwhis realm other meetings, assemblies, or congregations of the king's ^orn subjects, than such as by the laws of this land are held and a^Qtoed, which may rightly challenge to themselves the name of true ancKlawful churches ; Lt him be excommunicated, and not res- tored but W the archbishop, after his repentance and public revocation of such hiaf wicked errors." Notice well the words Mr. Darling h^is omitted ; »r, as you see, they entirely alter the meaning intended to be given yok.^ The laws of England hold and allow the Rora^m Catholic tobe'iklavvful church, by the annual grant to Maynooth alone. The laws of England hold and allow the Presbyterians, Baptists, and Independentsy^o be true and lawful churches, by the regium, donurn^ and the annusd grant of ministers' money, as it is called. Conse- quently, I am ftiUy borne out by this canon of the Church of England in recognizing my Protestant brethren as belonging to this or that church. <^ " Anothert^'liurch (Popish) principle is, that there are three differerat orders qC^inisters in the church, and that they must be ordained by bishops' deriving their authority by unbroken succession from the apostles.V (Pastoral Letter, page 3.) Now, except the declaration that the/Church of England recdgnizes bishops, priests, and deacons, Mr. D^ing has not in his letter adduced, neither can he adduce (as he wjpl knows) one single proof from the articles, or liturgy, muclt less from the bible, to support the doctrine of individual apostolical succession. '^■But," says Mr. Norris, " the apostolical succession is a mere fi^'- mcnt.V Mr. Norris says no such thing ; he says, in page 22 of bis letter, \indiyidual apostolical succession is a figment." But he holds and mintains the doci .ine of the apostolical succession of the chrip- tian ral^iistry generally^ as a truth in accordance with scripture, and likewise acknowledged by the Church of England. But let us bp- ware, fny friends, of " setting the church and her ministers in the 3 It: if ■ ! .* placo of Chri-l,, tho hojid of tlio churcli, niiJ of aubHtituting" the meanr of grace for the spirit of gnice." At the uppor piirt of page 4 of tlie Pustornl Letter occurs another false quotation. Tlie preface to tho oidiimtion service is made to nav that, *' It is evident unto all men diligently reading holy scripture and ancient authors, that from the Apostles' time there have been these orders of ministers in Chri.st's churcli ; bishops, priests, and' deacons," " And no man shall be accounted or taken to be a lawful bishop^ \ priest, or deacon, except ho hath had episcopal consecration or ordi- . nation." Nov»r turn, my triends, to the preface in question, and youy will find it says: "And no man shall bo accounted or taken to be k lawful bishop, priest, or deacon, in the United Church of England ai%4 Ireland^ or sulFercd to execute any of the said functions, except, d^r., lie hath had episcopal ordinationJ' What a wide difference is hjlre. Mr. Darling makes the church to say, no man shall be accounted a jawful bishop, priest, or deacon, unless opiscopally ordained ; bjut the church says no such thing, as you yourselves see. She only says they liliall not be accounted bishops, priests, or deacons of the Clitirch of England. " O, popery ! how dost thou change men ; thou deBtrbyest humanity in the most humane, and conscience m the onca most conscientious." I have neither time nor inclination to wade througli such a iaass of inaccuracies and misrepresentations. Can Mr. Darling be s^far on the road to Rome as to believe the end justices the means? ai^ there- fore, if he can only make you think his teaching is in accor^ktice wnth the church, your suspicions will be lulled, and your fears Jassuaged ; and that by little and little you may be led from the simjple doctrine of a crucified Saviour to embrace the whole system of popery. I hope not, but I must warn you to beware ; trust not assertiqa, test every doctrine by the word of God. Think what Uranmer, Ridley, Hooper. Litimer, and others of that noble army of martyrs, suffered for our sakes ; how they laboured that the truth might be oQts. Will you, my dear friends, have the traditions of men, in howfever modified a form, your rule of faith ; or the bible ? What is thefidoctrine of the sacrament of the Lord's supper, as explained in the I^toral Letter, but a refined transubstantiation ? What is the doctrine of the bap- tismal regeneration of infants, but making that sacramer^t, instead of faith^ the chief means of salvation ? W^hat is the doctrinotof indivi- dual apostolical succession, but leading you to think of the 'creature more than the creator ; to man, instead of to God ? Wh^t is tlie definition of the Churcli as therein asserted, but leading men "from the inward spiritual life, to place dependence on outward forms, Rites and ceremonies ? Cast away such human superadditions, which get^erate a spirit of bondage and a subjection to the rudiments of this vtorld, and believe, with St. Paul, that "By grace ye are saved through f^tlu and that not of yourselves, for it is the gift of God." O, weak^-inot the grand doctrine of Christianity, the comer stone of the Reforri^tioD, namely, the grace of God in our justification by the alone pirerits of Josus Christ, by any traditions of men. Allow not for one riy>ment the bible to be taken from you [read the sixth article of our ohurch], an^n and educated, for they ^^•cre frail fallible men, groping their way at ||rst in darkness, struggling against feelings, prejudices and assooiatiois that had grown with their growth and increased with their strength, even after light had been vouchsafed to them, some- times haltijig between two opinions, and sometimes of course erring in judgment^^pur oidy wonder is that they did so much, but the hand of God ■v^as with them, teaching, strengthening and supporting them — will ^wever Mr. Darling shew us in the Reformers later writings thelr>belief in tlie doctrine of infant hapthmal regeneration^ he can no mote do so than he could shew it you in the Bible, Re- member wljijSi* I said in my letter about the meaning of the wor church asserts their equality clearly and without hesitation. , ,(■1 of n- )« id >y I.) on At pajjjo of ihe pastoml letter Mr. HuHinji; wiya, that when I u.is vour minister, for siu'h I suppose lie nu'iins by the word " Parnon," Mul» word being wliollv inapplicable in this country, " I t&»'«jht, those • loctrinosund uphold (hose j)racticeH." Ctin anything be more untrue. I as you well know did not use the .surplice in the pulpily J did not imu my buck to you in uny part of the liturgy, J. never tKUght bap- tismal regeneration, I never taught i«(/i<'/(/Ma/ Apostolical Sut^cesnion, and this Mr. Darling must know, as soon after his taking charge of the congregation several soceeded from tlio chun-h uololy on account vf those very practices and doctrines being introduced, and cojjsidered Uy Uiom unscriptural novelties. C Mr. Darling would throw discredit upon my estimation of the ntbnber of perverts to the Church of Rome ; 1 am confident I am far'^nder the mark. The Baltimore Catholic Mirror rocrntly }»ub- liah^d til : names of one hundred and eighty-five English clergymen who Vjave fallen away since 184'2. I have also a list of over two hundred graduates of Oxford and Cambridge who have seceeded ; and wMen we remember the lay perversions at liugb}', Manchester, Glasgow, Lond«)n and other towns wore reckoned by hundreds in each ])lac% add to these the perversions lav Mid clerical in the United States* and elsewhere, I nm very cure the number will far exceed five thoua^d. Mr.^Darling doubts whether the average income of a Colonial Bishop]^ £2000 sterling a year. The Bishop of Calcutta receives £6000, Jj[imaica, Madras, and Bombay £4000 each. Sydney, Bar- badoes, Antigua and the Leeward Islands £2,600 each. Indeed there are only tw^ bishops, namely, Ruperts Lnnd and Sierra Leone wlio nominally rpceive but £600, but tliis is nearly doubled by each hold- ing a GovernHaQnt Colonial Chaplaincy at the same time — to these iacomes allowances to a consiJerable amount are to be added. At the bottoni of page 11 of the pastoral, Mr. Darling repeatA again a false cmotation from my " letter to the Protestant* of Canada," because I thereyi state my conviction that " the doctrines (or articles) and formularifls are upon the whole Scriptural and admirably au.tpted to the wants ymd feelings of mankind." And > I deliberately repeat in my opink^ they are ; but mind, Mr. Darling in quoting my words always oiy^ one important reservation namely, " taken as a whole^ How tlij[s can happen so frequently I cannot say, it certainly must be done dflteignedly or through gross carelessness, in either case it shews that littJe dependence can be placed upon the extracts he produces from o^er authorities. ]3ecause I consider there are objectionable wor^a and phrases in the prayer book which I should gladly see remedied, and they are but few, but still they disfigure that noble conjpilation, and are a source of much , misunderstanding and some- times contention, am I for thus thinking to be considered an enemy ^of ray church and order — far from it — Mr. Darling knows well that maTiy^pf the most eminent divines of the Church of England have wishe^ these things amended, but diflBculties have always stood in the >\ay, which it is t-^ be hoped before long will be removed by tlie churchienjoying synodal action. • . • In qpnclusion I can only express ray regret that any controveroy should, have arisen between Mr. Darling and myself, but I cannot allowjfira to declare that he " teaches honestly and truly what the { w V. V V J ' . 10 Church of England holds to be true." If his teaching is in accord- ance with the doctrines and practices defended by him in his letter he has no businebs to remain a single day longer a member of the Church of England ; he has nothing in common with her, for where will ho find the doctrine of individual Apostolical Succession in the articles or prayer book ? AVbere will he find the real presence in the sacra- ment of the Lord's supper ? Where will he find his definition of the Church ? Where will ]ie find directions to turn from the people 'i Where to wear the surplice in the pulpit? Where the peculiar holi- y ness of the chancel ? Search these things my friends like the noblf'^ Bereans of old, and see if they be so. AH these doctrines and pni(<* ticos are held and practised by the Church of Rome but not by tU* Church of England. Indeed to use the words of that great and g^Bd man the present bishop of Calcutta, " The attempt to set up Catholic tradition, and the teaching of the Church, as the joint rule of ^ith, directly tends to bring in, what the Apostle terms, another GSspel.''^ (Galatians 1. 6.) / " A fearful charge this, and which I am persuaded the leaders in this new way are far from, designing ; but which appears to m^from an attentive perusal of their writings, to be the inevitable restolt of the course they are pursuing." f " The whole hangs together — it institutes another gospel — ^it*otnakes man his own Saviour — it repeata the very errors of the Gklatian churches, which drew forth St. Paul's awful denunciations-^it over- turns the grand peculiarity and centre tenet of all the^reformed churches — it is a covenant of works, not a salvation by grajbe through faith — it is a sort of mitigated law, in which sincerity, good intentions, and imperfect works, done through grace, are accepted^^y virtue of Christ's merits, in the place of perfect obedience." ^ ^.m-^i^ " JSTor is it diflScult to trace the steps of the processf in their minds. When once we get into a false way, we are never 8af(^one moment. The Spirit of God is grieved, and leaves us to an in^tuated under- standing ; and there is nothing which man may not(' then embrace and defend. So it is here." :..»„■... V .,.., " I. The traditions of men having gone on working, ac I have pre- viously described, till they brought in a detrimental 4«ligion ; the descent to another gospel was gradual and not easity obsiwred. It sprang naturally from the darkness of the human mind aniff an in- creasing neglect of the one inspired rule of faith — the bible — the inevitable result of the whole scheme." V " II. The settlement of our church at the blessed Reformatio^ would not long stand in the way. A perverted taste soon learned to under- value the Reformers, to disown the name of Protestant, and to a^ow a preference for the imperfectly purified formularies of Henry VlII.' All this has accordingly been done, and don*^ openly." ^ " III. Charitable concessions to the apostate Church of Rom^^ fol- lowed; and as many as possible of her tenets ^nd practiceafWere commended and restored, notwithstanding that oui' Reformeri had swept them away as fond and superstitious." / " IV. The result, as to the charitable and affectionate regar(f which our first Reformers entertained for their sister churches on the continent, may be anticipated. Rome, and not the Reformed Churches, is the object of veneration. Episcopacy is accounted, in the teeth fef our 2 tt / articles (nineteenth nnd twenty-second), to be absolutely, and under all circumstances, essential to the very existence of a church, and the vali- dity of the sacrainonts. A great stress is laid upon a visible and unbroken material succession to the apostolic ofice, on which kind of succession our articles are silent ; whilst succession to the apostolic doctrines^ on which <]octnnes they largely insist, is taken for granted, without proof, to bo uniformly maintained. It follows that all the Reformed Churches and communities of Christians, though embraced^ and intended to bo embraced within the limits of the articles to which I have alluded ; yet if, from whatever causes, they have not retained the exact episcopal polity, are treated not with the consideration of our great Reformers, but in the exclusive and condemnatory temper of ^ later age. Charily and the communion of the saints are thus aa muc^ violated, as the fundamental truths and simple worship and ordef-pf the gospel of Christ." "V^One obstacle remained: our noble thirty-nine articles of reli- gion, dJ^wn up on purpose to oppose and condemn the chief errors in (loctrin* and practice of the Romish Church. Porte.: tous as is the fact, , they have been openly assailed by one of the most dishonorable efforts, of sophistry which, I must say, has ever been witnessed in the- ological discussions ; and which forms a melancholy proof of what a learned^nd e.vrnest and able writer is capable, when under the baneful influen(i<5 ^^ ^ Iheory." (Ordination Sermon, 1841.) This ii^a lon.g extract, but I cannot forbear inserting it ; and when I assure you the present Archbishops of Canterbury, York and Armagh, with the Bishops of Manchester, Hereford, and many others, use language precisely to the same effect, I leave it with you, my friends, to thtpk whether I or Mr. Darling, to use his words at page 9 of the Pastoral Letter, " have counted so largely upon what he must suppose your ignorance, that he would persuade you that these i e the doctrines and practices of the Church of England." We have here a fearful and melancholy proof liow false doctrines and the desire to support a favc^-ito tlieory will lead a man astray. Never, I assure you, and you hAve the means to judge for yourselves, has it been my lot to review £V document so full of erroneous statements and garbled quotations ; but I wish to say ns little as possible on the subject — it is too painful. The prayer book is in the hands of you all ; judge prayerfully', calmly and dispassionately. It is n^t iny intention to notice any further attacks on my pamph- let ; but if Mr. Darling, or any other person properly qualified, shall desire it^I am willing to meet such person in public discussion in any part of Uppei' Canada, for one qf more days, to prove — First, That the doctrines ;nid practices mentioned by Mr. Darling are not those of the Church of England, — Secondly, That they are all maintained by the Church of Rome, — and Thirdly, That they receive no support from the bible, but are all opposed to it. I deeply regret to say that in my opinion Mr. Darling is one of the number of those "rash teachers who seem to think it enough, here and there to protest against certain popish con-uptions ; but they love to lead tlieir disciples to the very confines of that treacherous ground — fellowsl^'p with Rome — they encourage a taste and liking for the pros- pect — tqcy Biiidy to make its boundaries less distinct and perceptible, and they^secm intent upon smoothing the w ay and affording facilities .w fl 1;. 12 for passing on from our own side to tho other. If this be not dan- gerous to the purity of our church, and of the faith which has been established among us by the blood of martyrs, it is hard to say what is ; and if it be reconcilable with that allegiance to which all her min- isters have over and over pledged themselves, then have we cleanse