IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 // 
 ^ 
 
 tj. 
 
 ^ "4^^. 
 
 
 4L 
 
 y ^> 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 u£ mi 125 
 
 
 1.25 j|U,,. 6 
 
 ■ 
 
 •^ 
 
 6" 
 
 ► 
 
 ^. 
 
 v: 
 
 
 °^ 
 
 Hiotographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^\ 
 
 a>^ 
 
 :\ 
 
 \ 
 
 
 6^ 
 
 33 wtST auuN snsi 
 (71*) vn-*i!M 
 
 ^^%^%^ 
 
 «> <> 
 
 ^ 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHIVI/ICIVIH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Insiitut canadion de microreproductions historiques 
 
T«chnical and Bibliographic Not««/Not«s tachniiiiMS at MbliographiquM 
 
 Th 
 to 
 
 Tho IfMtituto has attomptod to obtain tha baat 
 original copy availabia for filming. Faaturaa of this 
 copy which may ba bibllographicaily unlqua. 
 which may altor any of tha imagaa In tha 
 raproduction, or which may algnlflcantly changa 
 tha uaual mathod of filming, ara chackad baiow. 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 n 
 n 
 
 Colourad covara/ 
 Couvartura da coulaur 
 
 I I Covara damagad/ 
 
 Couvartura andommagia 
 
 Covara raatorad and/or laminatad/ 
 Couvartura raatauria at/ou palliculAa 
 
 I — j Covar titia miaaing/ 
 
 D 
 
 La titra da couvartura manqua 
 
 Colourad mapa/ 
 
 Cartaa gAogr :*hiqua« an coulaur 
 
 Colourad in .a. othar than blua or blacic)/ 
 Encra da coc.^ur (i.a. autra qua blaua ou noirai 
 
 Colourad plataa and/or illustrationa/ 
 Planchaa at/ou illustrationa an coulaur 
 
 Bound with othar matarial/ 
 RaliA avac d'autras documanta 
 
 Tight binding may cauaa shadows or distortion 
 along intarior margin/ 
 
 La reliura sarrAe paut causar da I'ombra ou da la 
 distortion la long da la marga intAriaura 
 
 Blanic iaavas addad during rastoration may 
 appaar within tha taxt. Whanavar possibia, thasa 
 have baan omittad from filming/ 
 II sa paut qua cartainaa pages blanches ajoutAas 
 lors d'une restauration apparalssant dans la texte, 
 mala, lorsqua cela 4tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas *t* filmies. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires supplAmantairas: 
 
 L'incritut a microfilm^ la mallleur exemplaira 
 qu'il lui a 4tA poaaibia da aa procurer. Lea details 
 da cat exemplaira qui aont paut-Atre uniquaa du 
 point da vue bibliographiqua. qui peuvent modifier 
 una image reproduite. ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dana la mAthode normale de filmage 
 aont IndiquAa ci-daaaous. 
 
 r~n Coloured pagea/ 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pagea damaged/ 
 Pegea andommagAea 
 
 Pagea restored and/oi 
 
 Pages restaurAes et/ou peiiiculAes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxei 
 Pages dAcolorAes. tachetAes ou piquAes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages dAtachAes 
 
 Showthrough> 
 Tranaperence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Qualit* inAgale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materii 
 Comprend du matAriel supplAmentaire 
 
 I — I Pagea damaged/ 
 
 I — I Pagea restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 I — I Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 I I Pages detached/ 
 
 r~71 Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print variaa/ 
 
 |~~| Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 Th 
 po 
 of 
 fllr 
 
 Orl 
 be 
 thi 
 sic 
 oti 
 fin 
 sic 
 or 
 
 Th 
 shi 
 Til 
 wli 
 
 Ml 
 
 dif 
 eni 
 be 
 rig 
 re( 
 m« 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Mition disponible 
 
 Pagea wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissuaa, etc.. have been ref limed to 
 enaura the best possible Imege/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obacurcias per un feuillet d 'errata, une palure. 
 etc.. ont At A filmAes A nouveau de fapon A 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at tha reduction ratio checlted below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmA au taux de rAduction indiquA ci-dessoua. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 / 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 aox 
 
 aAX 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
■ilt 
 
 du 
 
 idifier 
 
 una 
 
 nag* 
 
 Tha copy filmad hara hat baan raproducad thanka 
 to tha o^naroaity of: 
 
 National Library off Canada 
 
 Tha imaga* appaaring hara ara tha baat quaiity 
 poaaibia conaidaring tha condition and lagibility 
 of tha original copy and in kaaping with tha 
 ffilming contract tpacif icationa. 
 
 Original copiaa in printad papar covara ara filmad 
 baginning with tha front covar and anding on 
 tha last paga with a printad or iliuatratad impraa- 
 sion, or tha back covar whan appropriata. All 
 othar original copiaa ara filmad baginning on tha 
 firat paga with a printad or iliuatratad impraa- 
 aion, and anding on tha iaat paga with a printad 
 or iliuatratad impraaaion. 
 
 Tha Iaat racordad frama on aach microficha 
 ahall contain tha symbol ^»> (moaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or tha symbol y (moaning "END"), 
 whichavar appiias. 
 
 IMapa. platas, charta, ate, may ba filmad at 
 diffarant raduction ratios. Thosa too larga to ba 
 antiraiy inciudad in ona axooaura ara filmad 
 baginning in tha uppar iaf , hand cornar, lafft to 
 right and top to bottom, aa many framas as 
 raquirad. Tha following diagrams illustrata tha 
 mathod: 
 
 L'axampiaira film* ffut raproduit grica A la 
 gAntroalti da: 
 
 BibliothAqua nationaia du Canada 
 
 Las imagas suivantaa ont At* raproduitaa avac la 
 plus grand soin. compta tanu da la condition at 
 da la nattat* tli» l'axampiaira film*, at an 
 conformitA avac las conditions du contrat da 
 filmaga. 
 
 Laa axamplairaa originaux dont la couvartura 9n 
 papiar ast imprlmAa sont filmAs an commandant 
 par la pramiar plat at an tarminant soit par la 
 darnlAra paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 d'impraaaion ou d'illustration. soit par la sacond 
 plat, aaion la caa. Tous laa autraa axamplairas 
 originaux sont filmAs an commandant par la 
 pramiAra paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 d'impraaaion ou d'illustration at an tarminant par 
 la darnlAra paga qui comporta una taila 
 amprainta. 
 
 Un daa symbolaa suivanta apparattra sur la 
 darnlAra imaga da chaqua microficha, salon la 
 cas: la aymbola — »> signifia "A SUIVRE", la 
 aymbola ▼ signifia "FIN". 
 
 Las cartas, pianchas, tablaaux, ate, p^^^vent Atra 
 fiimAs A das taux da rAduction diffffAre its. 
 Lorsqua la documant aat trop grand pour Atra 
 raproduit an un saul clichA, ii ast ffilmA A partir 
 da I'angla supAriaur gaucha, da gaucha A droite, 
 at da haut 9n baa, ^n pranant la nombre 
 d'imagas nAcaaaaira. Laa diagrammas suivants 
 illustrant la mAthoda. 
 
 irrata 
 to 
 
 pelura. 
 n A 
 
 n 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
CANADIAN APPEALS. 
 
 / 
 
 A COMPLETE COLLECTION OF CANADIAN CASES 
 
 TAKEN ON APPEAL TO THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY 
 
 COUNCIL. AND OF REPORTED CASES CARRIED TO THE 
 
 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, AND THE COURTS OF 
 
 APPEAL IN UPPER CANADA AND ONTARIO, 
 
 UP TO MARCH l8T, 1894, SHOWING THE 
 
 JUDICIAL HISTORY OF ALL 
 
 SUCH CASES. 
 
 BY 
 
 C. H. MASTERS, B.A. 
 
 Barrister ; 
 
 A$$Utant Reporter of tlie Supreme Court of Canada, 
 
 TORONTO : 
 
 THE CARSWELL Co. (Ltd.) LAW PUBLISHERS, Etc. 
 
 1894. 
 
M3% 
 
 Entered aooor ding to Act of the Parliament of Canada, in the year one »»»««"« 
 TgSThundred and ninetyfour. by O. H. Masters. In the office of the 
 Minister of Agriculture. 
 
 TOBOMTO : 
 PBUITBD BY THB OABSWBIiL CO. (LTD.) 
 a3,30ADBLAIDB ST. BAST. 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 THIS collection of cases is intended by the compiler to serve 
 as an aid in the study of case law by enabling the lawyer 
 or student examining any reported case to ascertain, by a single 
 reference to the proper list, whether or not such case has been 
 carried to appeal, and if it has what was the result of such appeal 
 and where it is reported. Such being the object of the compilation 
 it is hardly necessary to say that cases reported only on appeal are 
 not inserted, with the exception, however, of those taken to the 
 Privy Council as to which the collection is complete. 
 
 To gather together the materials for the preparation of this 
 little volume has called for the expenditure of no small amount of 
 time and labour, and the greatest care has been exercised to insure 
 accuracy. If it proves to be of any value to those engaged in 
 the study and practice of the law, the object of the compilation 
 will have been attained. 
 
 C. H. MASTERS. 
 Ottawa, April 2nd, 1894. 
 
ScrR 
 
 EXCH 
 
 Paov 
 
 Pbov: 
 
 Provi 
 
 Pbovi 
 
 Pbovi 
 
 Pkovi] 
 Pbovi; 
 
 North 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 ScPRBMB Court of Canada— p^u,^ 
 Appealii to Privy Council 1 
 
 EzCHEgUER COORT OF CaNAPA— 
 
 Appeals to Supreme Court 4 
 
 Province of Ontario— 
 
 Appeals to Privy Council 5 
 
 *• '* Supreme Court g 
 
 Appeals to Court of Appeal — 
 
 From Court of Chancery J4 
 
 " " Queen's Bench 20 
 
 " " " Common Pleas 26 
 
 •• Hi>{h Court of Justice 29 
 
 Provinoe of Quebec— 
 
 Appeals to Privy Council 41 
 
 " " Supreme Court 4 
 
 Province of Nova Scotia— 
 
 Appeals to Privy Council 57 
 
 " " Supreme Court 5 
 
 Province of Nkw Brunswick— 
 
 Appeals to Privy Council 64 
 
 " " Supreme Court 05 
 
 Provinob of Manitoba— 
 
 Appeals to Privy Council 69 
 
 " *' Supreme Court 69 
 
 Province of Bri-^ish Columbia — 
 
 Appeals to Supreme Court 7I 
 
 Province of Prince Edward Island— 
 
 Appeals to Privy Council •. . . . 71 
 
 " " Supreme Court , 72 
 
 North-West Territories— 
 
 Appeals to Supreme Court 72 
 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS. 
 
 [ ] A.C. 
 All. 
 
 App. Cas. 
 A.R. 
 Asp. M.S. 
 
 B.C.R. 
 B.C.L.R. 
 
 C.L.J. 
 C.P. 
 
 Can. Oaz. 
 Cook V.A. 
 
 Dor. Q.B. 
 
 E.d; A. Rep. 
 Ex. C.R. 
 
 Or. 
 
 Jur. N.S. 
 
 L.C.J. 
 
 L.C.L.J. 
 
 L.C.R. 
 
 L..T. 
 
 L.N. 
 
 L.R.P.C. 
 
 L.T. 
 
 M.L.R.Q.B. 
 M.L.R.8.C. 
 Man. L.R. 
 Moo. N.S. 
 Moo. P.C. 
 
 N.B. Dig. 
 N.B. R. 
 N.B. Rep. 
 N.S. Rep. 
 N.W.T. Rep. 
 
 Law Reports, Appeal Caaet, Present series. 
 
 Allen's Reports (New Brunswick). 
 
 Law Reports, Appeal Cases. 
 
 Ontaris Appeal Reports. 
 
 Aspinall's Maritime Cases, New series. 
 
 British Culuinbia Reports. 
 British Columbia Law Reports. 
 
 Canada Law Journal. 
 Common Pleas Reports (Upper Canada). 
 Canadian Gazette (Published in London). 
 Cook's Vice-Admiralty Reports (Lower Canada). 
 
 Dorion's Queen's Bench Reports (Lower Canada). 
 
 Error and Appeal Reports (Upper Canada). 
 Exchequer Court of Canada Reports. 
 
 Grant's Chancery Reports (Upper Canada). 
 
 Jurist, New series (English). 
 
 Lower Canada Jurist. 
 
 Lower Canada Law Journal. 
 
 Lower Canada Reports. 
 
 Law Journal, New series (fCnglish). 
 
 Legal News (Montreal). 
 
 Law Reports, Privy Council (English). 
 
 Law Times, New series (English). 
 
 Montreal Law Reports, Queen's Bench. 
 " •' •• Superior Court. 
 
 Manitoba Law Reports. 
 Moore's Privy Council Roiiorts. New series. 
 
 New Brunswick Digest (Stevens). 
 New Brunswick Reports. 
 
 Nova Scotia Reports. 
 North-West Territories Reports. 
 
List of Ahhreviationa. 
 
 Vll 
 
 O.R. 
 0.8. 
 Old. 
 
 P. <ft B. 
 P.E.I. Rep. 
 P.R. 
 Pogs. 
 
 Q.B. 
 
 Q.L.R. 
 
 g.R.Q.B. 
 
 R. .tC. 
 R. AG. 
 R.E.D. 
 R.L 
 Rev, Crit. 
 
 S.C. Dig. 
 S.C.R. 
 Stewart V. A. 
 Stu. L.C.R. 
 Stu. V.A. 
 
 Ontario Reporta. 
 
 King's Benoh Reports, Old Mriee (Upper Canada). 
 
 Oldright'a Reports (Nova Bootia). 
 
 Pagsley A Barbidge's Reports (New Brunswick). 
 Prince Edward Ibland Reports. 
 Practice Reports (Ontario). 
 Pugsley's Reports (New Brunswick). 
 
 Upper Canada Queen's Bench Reports, 
 
 Quebec Law Reports. 
 
 Quebec Reports, Queen's Bench. Present series. 
 
 Russell & Chesley's Reports (Nova Scotia). 
 Russell & Oeldert's Reports (Nova Scotia). 
 Russell's Equity Reports (Nova Scotia). 
 La Revue Legale (Lower Canada). 
 La Revue Critique (I^ower Canada). 
 
 Cassell's Digest Supreme Court Reports (1808) 
 Supreme Court of Canada Reports. 
 Rep. .Stewart's Vioe-Admiralty Reports (Nova St otia). 
 Stuart's Lower Canada Reports. 
 Stuart's Vice-Admiralty Reports (Lower Canada). 
 
 Times L.R. Times Law Reports (English). 
 
 U.C.C.P. Upper Canada Common Pleas Reports. 
 
 U.C.L.J. Upper Canada Law Journal, Old series. 
 
 U.C.Q.B. Upper Canada Queens Bench Reports. 
 
 W.R. 
 
 Weekly Reporter (English). 
 
1 1 
 
 i i 
 
 ADDENDA PT CORRIGENDA. 
 
 Page 2.— To cases from Supreme Court to Privy Council, add : McAllister v. 
 Forsyth (12 8. C. R. 1) 5 U. 4 O. 151. Nova Hcotia Dig 147. 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 Union Bank of Canada v. O'Gara (22 S. C. H. 404) 22 Can. Oaz. 5A7. 
 Leave to appeal granted ; stands for argument. 
 
 Pa<»b 4.— In Archibald v. The Queen, The Queen v. Demers, The Queen v. 
 Farwell, and S. B. Santandarino v. Vanvert, for result of appeal , 
 read: "Judgment affirmed. " 
 
 In The Queen v. Bhip Oscar & Uattie, read : "Judgment reversed." 
 
 Paoe S. — In " Act respecting Assignments and Preferences." for result of appeal, 
 read: "Judgment reversed; and for report on appeal, read: "22 
 Can. Gaz. 514.'* 
 
 In Tennant v. Union Bank, for report on appeal, read: "[1894] 
 A. C. 31.'' 
 
 Page 6.— In Beaver v. G. T. Ry. Co., for result of appeal, read: "Judgment 
 reversed." 
 
 Paob 8.— To Cases from Ontario Courts to Bupreme Court, add : Holiday v. 
 Hogan (20 A. R. 298) 22 O. R. 235. 22 8. C. R.. Judgment 
 reversed. 
 
 Page 11.— In Purcell v. Bergin, for result of api)eal; read : " Judgment reversed." 
 
 Page 12.— In Virgo v. City of Toronto, for result of appeal, read : " Judgment 
 reversed in part." 
 
 
CASES IN THE SUPKEME COURT OF CANADA 
 CAKRIED TO THE PRIVY COUNCIL. 
 
 Cams. 
 
 Krih)ht on Api'Ial. Rkhclt or Ari'iAL. 
 
 AUiater v. 
 Dig 147. 
 
 . Oftz. 5A7. 
 
 Qneen v. 
 I of appeal . 
 
 inied." 
 
 i of appeal, 
 read: "22 
 
 [1894] 
 
 udgmont 
 
 oliday v. 
 Judgment 
 
 reversed." 
 Judgment 
 
 Alexander v. Vye (10 S. C. R. 501) 28 N.Nun*". 
 
 B. K. Ml. I 
 
 Arpin v. The l^ieen (14 S. C. R. 780). |10 Can. <ia/.. 275. 
 
 I Leave to apiJeal refuM-d. 
 |l^'"v> t«) ap|wal refiu-wl. 
 
 Atty.-Gten. of BritiMh Columbia v. Atty.-14 App. CaH. 21t5: 58 L. tliidinijtmt reven««l. 
 Gen. ofCanaila(14H. C. R. S45). ■ " " 
 
 Atty.-Uen. of Canada v. City of Toronto, 
 (S. C. Diir. r>7) IH A. R. 022; 20 O. R. 19. 
 
 Barrott v. City of Winnipeg (19 8. C. 
 R. 374} 7 Mali. L R. 278 
 
 Beatty v. North Weat Trana. Co. (12 S. 
 O. R. M«) 11 A. R. 206 ; O. R. 300. 
 
 Beaudet v. North 8hore Ry. Co. (16 S. 
 
 C. R. 44). 
 Bickford v. Corporation of Chatham (10 
 
 S. C. R. 236) 14 A. R. 32 ; 10 O. R. 
 
 2.57. 
 Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. v. Cityof OtUwa 
 
 (12 S. C. R. 306) 12 A. R. m (8 O. R 
 
 183, 201). 
 Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. v. Township of 
 
 Cambridge (l.*) S. C. R. 219) 14 A. R. 
 
 29!). 
 Canada Central Ry. Ca v. Murray (8 S. C. 
 
 R. 313J 7 A. K. 040. 
 Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Robiniion (19 
 
 5 C. R. 292) ; M. L. R. Q. B. 118 ; 
 
 6 .S. C. 225. 
 
 Central Vermont Ry. Co. v. Town of St. 
 Johns (14 S. C. R. 288) 30 L. C. J. 122. 
 Chevrier v. The Queen (4 S. C. R. 1). 
 
 r np|f. v^«»n. «*rt^i «jo jj. < 
 
 J. 88 ; 00 L. T. 712 ; 
 6TimeBL. R. 386. ' 
 21 Can. Oax. 414. Leave to appe/il refuned. 
 
 A. C. 446 ; 01 L. iJudgrnient reverked. 
 ; 07 L. T. 429. I 
 12 A\n>, Can. ft89 ; 60 Judgment reversed. 
 L. .1. 102; 67 L. T. 
 
 420 ; M W. R. 047. 
 10 Can. Gaz. 4(». 
 
 14 Can. Oaz. 153. 
 
 11 Can. Goz. 394. 
 
 8 App. Cas. 674. 
 
 Leave to apiieal refused. 
 Leave Ui ap|>ual refused. 
 
 Leave Ut appeal irranted 
 in both caHes, out ap- 
 peals not prosecuted. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 [1892] A. C. 481; 01 L.i Judgment reverM<.d. 
 J. 79 ; 07 L. T. 606. | 
 
 14 App. Cas. 690 ; 59 L. Judgement affirmed. 
 J. 15 ; 01 L. T. 441. 
 
 Citizens' Ins. Co, 
 Qut-on 
 
 tens Ins. Co. v. Parsons. '\ 
 
 Dn's Ins. Co. v. Parsons (4 S. C R. I 
 215) 4 A. R. 90, 103; 43 U. C. Q. B. t 
 201. 271. j 
 
 Duggan V. London & Canadian Lrtan Co. 
 (20 S. C. R. 481) 18 .V. R. 305 ; 19 O. 
 R. 272. 
 
 Dumoulin v. Langtry (13 S. C. R. 258) 7 
 O. R. 499 044. 
 
 Dupuy v.* Ducondu (0 S. C. R. 425). 
 
 E.Ychange Bank of Canada v. La Banque 
 
 du Peuple (S. < '. Dig. 79). 
 Forsyth v. Bury {]:> S. C. U. 543). 
 
 M.I).— 1 
 
 Leave to ap|)eal refused. 
 
 7 App. Cas. 90 ; 51 L. Judgment affirmed as U 
 ' 11 ; 45 L. T. 721. 
 
 versetl 
 [1893] A. C. .500 ; 03 L.; Judgment reversed. 
 J. 14. I 
 
 validity of Ont. Insur- 
 ance Act, otherwise re- 
 
 57 L. T. 317. 
 
 {Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 9 App. Cas. l.^Oj 53 L. 'Judgment reversed. 
 
 J. 12 ; 50 L. T. 129. ! 
 9 Can. Gaz. 394. 
 
 11 Can. Gaz. 418. 
 
 Leave to appeal refuseil. 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 
I 
 
 Cases til the Siijcuvm^ Court 
 
 Cask. 
 
 RETtrtT <KC ArrzxL. Resilt of Aitkal. 
 
 F«'(lericton, City of, v. Th«> t^tiwii (3 S. Rife^iefl x. Tb«- <^tH*ii, Judgment affirmed in a 
 
 C. R. iVlft) li v. & K i:VX 7 All*. Ca*. >«♦. case from New Bnms. 
 
 raising ttame queHtion. 
 Gapnon v. Prince (7 S. C. R. :iw;) 2 D«.r. >» Ai>(». Ca*. MO. Leave to apjieal refused. 
 
 Q. H. 7». 
 (tlenKarry Electiun Case (14 .S. C. R. 4.">3i. -V) I* T. ^TS; 4 Timen Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 L.R.«6L 
 (Srand Tnmk Ry. Co. v. lUckett {lt> S.'JCitu. *i»i. X,*L 
 
 C. R. 713) V.i A. R. 174 : S O. K. •>»!. 
 Grand Tnmk Ry. Co. v. McMillan ( 16 Whe-^HT. P. C. 
 
 S. C. R. 543) 15 A. R. 14: llM). K. »*i 
 
 lo;{. 
 
 Great Western Ins. Co. v. .Ionian (14 ff. <^Caii. Gaz. 4«4. 
 
 C. R. 734) 24 N. B. R. 421. i 
 
 jLeave to appeal refused. 
 Law Leave to ap|>eal refuKed. 
 
 Leave to appeal granted 
 i but api)eal never proKe- 
 i cuted. 
 
 Halifax & Cajte Breton Coal and Ry. C«i. 11 Afi;*. Cji^ 22!>: .Vi L. Leave to appeal refused. 
 V. Gregory (S. C. Dip. 727) 4 R. & G. J- ♦»: Xi L. T. 270;, 
 436. #adl BMiH. Any. -Gen I 
 
 ni X'«ra Ssouti* v. i 
 
 lloggan V. Es<iuimault & Nanaimo Ry. Nud»^ .Stands for aigiimcnt. 
 
 Co. (20 S. C. R. 'J3.'.). 
 •lolintion V. Trustees of St. Andrew .t 3 Apfn. Cwv. 1V<: 37 L. Leave to apiieal refu^xl. 
 
 Church (1 S. C. R. 23.")) 18 L. C. F. 113 -. T. V*; 36 W. R. a*j9. 
 
 n R. L. 48. 
 Kearney v. Creelman (14 S. C. R. ;i3) ♦> ."^ Can. *rtUL 154. Leave to ap()eal r('fui-t"<l. 
 
 R. & G. S>2. 
 Lanioureux v. Molletir (S. C. Dig. 71). J* Can. Gax. l-VL Leave to apjieal lefusttl. 
 
 Lawless V. Sullivan (3 S. C. R. 117) 1 P. 6 .\pfi. Can^ 373 : .'lO L. Judgment reversed. 
 
 & B. 431. J. .« : 44 L. T. <«7 ;' 
 
 ^ W. R. yi7. ! 
 
 Les Ecclesiiistiques de St. Sul|iic»' v. Pirv 14 An- *-*«^. *Xtt- .iH L. Leave to ai>peal refused. 
 
 of .Montreal (Ki S. C. K. 3'.i:i) M. L. K. J. l""!: Cii L. T. ilVi. 
 
 4 q. li. 1 ; 2 S. C. 2»«). 
 
 Lewin v. Wilson (U S. C. R. »>37). 11 .\M«.CaiiK^ai*: SriL. .Tudgment reversed. 
 
 J. TT.; ->;. I^ T. 410; 
 2Tini»*L. K.741. 
 Liquor License Act, 1S83, In n, [S. C. »> Can « iaz. ITiii 2<'».">. .Judgment holding Act 
 Dig. fKKt). valid as to wholei-ale 
 
 licenses reversed. 
 Maritime Bank v. The (^ueen (17 S. C. ir> C*n. «i!ai. 3W4. L«rave to api>eal refused. 
 
 R. iiTu) 27 X. B. R. 3:>7. 
 Maritime Bank v. Rec.-(ien. of New Bnin:*- [l>Se" .\- f. 437 : '>1 L. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 wick (20 S. V. R. 0'.»5) 27 X. B. R. 37'.>. J. "• : C7 L, T. 12ti. 
 Martley v. Carson (20 8. C. R. •i34i. 14 Can, Gax. 270, am6 Api)eal dismissed on 
 
 ■««*. Clark V. Carson, preliminary cbjecticjns, 
 merits not decided. 
 Mercer v. The Atty.-Gen. of Ontario (.">:» Aff^^ Ca*. r«i7: •"»2 L. Judgment reversed. 
 
 S. C. R. .538) «; A. H. .'.70 : 2»; « Jr. I2»;. J. M : «• L. T. 312. i 
 Moffatt v. Merchants' Bank of Canada •> Can. <>az. l-*<3. Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 (11 S. C. R. 4«) 5 O. R. 122. 
 Moore v. Connecticut Mutual In.t. Co. d Apfk. Ca*. 644. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 (« S. C. R. 034) 3 A. R. 230 ; 41 V. C. I 
 
 «i. B. 4S)7. ! 
 
 McLaren v. Caldwell (8 S. C. R. 4;J.M 9 A^^ Ca*. 3!C : .'.3 L. Judgment reversed. 
 
 5 A. R. 3«3. J. »: T.l L. T. 370. 
 
 McQueen v. The Queen (10 S. C. R. 1). 11 Can. Ga*. 368. Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 West 
 R. 
 7 0. 
 
 William 
 , V. . 
 Windsfii 
 
 <^ie. 
 
 Xasmith v. Manning (5 S. C. R. 417) 5 Nooe. 
 A. R. 120 ; 29 C. P. 34. 
 
 'Leave to apneal gran ted , 
 • but appeal not prose- 
 I cuted. 
 
Carried to the Privy Council. 
 
 a 
 
 ITRAL. 
 
 iied in a 
 w Bnins. 
 lueHtion. 
 r refused. 
 
 1 refused. 
 
 ,1 refused. 
 
 J refused. 
 
 al granted 
 ever prtme- 
 
 al refused. 
 
 fument. 
 sal refus< <1. 
 
 eal rcfuci"*!. 
 eal refused. 
 
 krereed. 
 
 lenl refused. 
 
 versied. 
 
 lolding Act 
 [to wholesale 
 rerfed. 
 )eal refused. 
 
 irmed. 
 
 feinissed <'n 
 Vy cbiections, 
 Idecided. 
 B versed. 
 
 eal refused. 
 Ilfirmed. 
 
 Cahe. 
 
 Parker v. Montreal Citv' Paiutenger Ry. Co. 
 (S. C. Dig. 731)7 L. N.IJW. 
 
 Rrport on Appeal. 
 
 Rkhult (»K AI'PEAI.. 
 
 6 Can. «az. 174. 
 
 Pion V. North Shorw Ky. Co. (14 S. C. R 
 
 «74) 12 II L. K. 205. 
 Pontiac, County of, v. Ross (17 S. C. R.jNone. 
 
 «ineljec, City of, v. (Quebec Central Ry. Cc. None, 
 (10 S. C. K. 'H'a). 
 
 Leave to a|t|teal refused. 
 
 14 App. Cas. 012; 59 L. iJudgnient afiinned. 
 .1.25; 61L. T. 525. 
 
 Leave to api>eal r<-fnsed. 
 
 (^ueen, Tlie, v. H.lleau (7 S. C. R. 53). 
 
 Queen, The, v. D«.utre (« S. C. R. 342). 
 
 Reed V. Mcus>«*«u (Atty.-Gen. of C^uebec 
 (8 S. C. R. 4<«) 2<i L C. J. 331. 
 
 Ross V. Hurteau (18 S. C. R. 713). 
 
 Russell V. Lefranc^.is (8 S. C. R. MS) 2 
 
 Dor. t/. B. 24.'>. 
 Sewell V. British Columbia Towing Co. 
 
 (» S. C. R. 527). 
 
 Sliields V. Leacock (8. C. Dig. 694). 
 
 7 App. Cjw. 473. 
 
 Leave to ap|>eal graiit<;d, 
 but appi'ul not prose- 
 cuted. 
 
 Judgment revei-sed. 
 
 9 App. Cas. 745 ; .53 L 'Judgment affirmed. 
 J.85;.-.1L. T. 6<}9. 
 
 10 App. Cas. 141 ; 54 L. Judgment aifinned. 
 J. 12; 52 L. T. 393;! 
 
 'X\ W. R. 618, »«/.! 
 nohi. Attv.-<»en. ofj 
 t^uebec v. Reed. • 
 None. Leave to ap]ieal refused. 
 
 Smith v. (;oldie (9 S. C. R. 46) 7 A. R. 628 
 
 None. 
 None. 
 
 None. 
 
 None. 
 
 14 App. Cas. 46; 58 L. 
 
 J. 54; 60 L. T. 197; 
 
 5 Times L. R. 125. 
 6 Can. Gaz. 583. 
 
 Leave to apis-al refused. 
 
 Leave to ap|>enl grant*^!, 
 
 btit apiH'al ncvei' prosd- 
 
 cuted. 
 Leave to ap|K'iiI gnvnte{1, 
 
 but ap|)eal nut prose- 
 
 cutwl. 
 Leave to api)eal refuffed. 
 
 St. Catharines Milling Co. v. The Queen 
 
 (13 S. C. R. 577) 13 A. R. 148; 10 
 
 O. R 196. 
 St. Lawrence & Ottawa Ry. Co. v. Lett!l 
 
 (US. C.R.422)11A.R.1;10.R.545.| .| 
 
 Sweeny v. Bank of Montreal (12 S.C. R. 12 App. Cas. 617; 56 L. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 S61 ) 5 L. X. 66. I J. 79 ; 56 L. T. 897. j 
 
 Valin v. Langlois (3 8. C. R. 1) 5 Q. L. 5 App. Cas. 115; 49 L. 'Leave to ai>peal refused. 
 
 Judgment afiinued. 
 Leave to app<'al refused. 
 
 R. 1. 
 
 Wadsworth v. McCortl (12 S. C. R. 466) 
 M. L. R. 2 Q- B. 113, 
 
 West v. Corporation of Parkdale (12 S. C 
 
 R. 25f)) 12 A. R. 393 ; 8 O. R. 59 ; 
 
 7 O. R. 27<i. 
 I Williams v. Township of Raleigh (21 S 
 
 f. R. 103). 
 [Windsor & Annapolis Ry. Co. v. The 
 
 Queen (10 .S. C. H. 33.V). 
 
 J. 37; 41L. T.662. 
 14 App. Cas. 631 ; 59 L. Judgment aftiriued. 
 
 J. 7; 61 I* T. 487,; 
 
 sub nom. McMuUen 
 
 V. Wadsworth. ! 
 
 12 App. Cas. f502 ; 56 L. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 J. 6(J ; 57 L. T. 602. 
 
 [1893] A. C. 540, 63 L. Jiidgment reversed. 
 
 J. 1 ; 69 L. T. .506. I 
 .55 L. J. 41 ; .55 L. T. 274 ;' Judgment as to iiii<i,itnm 
 
 2 Times L. R. 743. , of (himages i.wi '1. 
 
 Bversed. 
 
 [peal refused. 
 
 eal granted, 
 not prose- 
 
[4] 
 
 : I 
 
 I'f! 
 
 li: 
 
 1' 
 
 CASES IN THE EXCHEQUER COURT OF CANADA 
 CARRIED TO THE SUPREME COURT. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Archibald v. The Queen (3 Ex. C. R. 251). 
 
 Atty.-Gen. of Ontario v. Atty.-Gen. of 
 
 Canada (1 Ex. C. R 184). 
 Bulmer v. The Queen (3 Hx. C. R. 184). 
 
 Burroughs v. The Queen (2 Ex. C. R. 293). 
 
 Carter v. Hamilton (3 Ex. C. R. 351). 
 
 Carter, Macy & Co. v. The Queen (2 Ex. 
 
 C. R. 126). 
 Charland v. The Queen (1 Ex. C. R 291). 
 
 RkPOKT on APPEAIi. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 730. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 420. 
 
 18 8. 
 16 S. 
 
 Clarke v. The Queen (2 Ex. C. R 141 ; 21 S. 
 3 Ex. C. R 1). 
 
 Quay V. The Queen (2 Ex, C. R 18). 
 
 Humphreys v. The Queen (2 Ex. C. R 386). 
 
 Kearney v. The Queen (2 Ex. C. R 21). 
 
 Martin v. The Queen (2 Ex. C. R 328). 
 
 Mayes v. The Queen (2 Ex. C. R. 403). 
 
 Merchants Bank of Canada v. The Queen 
 
 (1 Ex. C. R. 1). 
 Monn V. The Queen (2 Ex. C. R. 396). 
 
 McGreevy v. The (^ueen (1 Ex. C. R 321). 
 
 Paint V. The Queen (2 Ex. C. R 149). 
 
 Paradis v. The Queen (1 Ex. C R 191). 
 
 Queen, The, v. Demers (3 Ex. C. R. 210). 
 
 Queen, The, v. Farwell (3 Ex. C. H. 271). 
 
 Queen, The, v. Ship Oscar and Hattie 
 
 (3 Ex. 0. R. 24lS, 
 Queen, The, v. St John Water Commis 
 
 sioners, (2 Ex. C. R 78). 
 S. S. Santandarino v. Vanvert (3 Ex. C, 
 
 R. 378). 
 Ship Quebec »n re (3 Ex. C. T 33). 
 
 Starrs v. The Queen (1 Ex. C. R 301). 
 
 Vezina v. The Quetn (2 Ex. C. R 11). 
 
 17 S. 
 20 S. 
 
 s.c. 
 
 20 S. 
 
 S. c. 
 
 20 S. 
 
 18 S. 
 18 S. 
 16 S. 
 
 C. R 706. 
 C. R. 721. 
 C. R 656. 
 
 C. R. 30. 
 C. R 591. 
 Dig. 313. 
 C. R. 240. 
 
 Dig. 636. 
 C. R. 515. 
 C. R. 371. 
 C. R. 718. 
 C. R. 716. 
 
 19 S. 
 
 C. 
 
 R. 
 
 125 
 
 20 a. 
 
 C, 
 
 R. 
 
 472 
 
 17 S. 
 
 C. 
 
 R. 
 
 118 
 
 17 S. 
 
 c. 
 
 R. 
 
 1. 
 
 Result ok Appbal. 
 
 Stands for judgment. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Svands for judgment. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Stands for argument. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 as to questiouM reported 
 in Exchequer Court. 
 
 Judgement reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed as to 
 
 measure of damages. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Stands for argument. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Stands for judgment. 
 
 Stands for judgment. 
 
 Stands for judgment. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Stands for judgment. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Peart 
 
 1911 
 Powelll 
 
 Ratte 
 10 ( 
 
 Reg. 
 
 SimpsoJ 
 
 S. 
 I Smart 
 
 ITennani 
 
 I i oront 
 
[5] 
 
 A.NADA 
 T. 
 
 udginent. 
 
 .ffinned. 
 
 iudgtnent. 
 
 iffirmed. 
 
 B^rgument. 
 
 affirmed. 
 
 affirmed. 
 
 appeal refused 
 «tiou» reported 
 equer Court, 
 reversed. 
 
 ; affirmed. 
 
 ; reversed as to 
 J of damaffes. 
 I reversed. 
 
 argument. 
 
 reversed. 
 
 affirmed. 
 
 reversed. 
 It affirmed. 
 »t reversed, 
 or judgment, 
 or judgment, 
 or judgment, 
 nt affirmed- 
 [or judgment, 
 int affirmed, 
 jnt reversed. 
 
 nt reversed. 
 
 CASES IN THE ONTARIO COURTS CARRIED TO 
 
 THE PRIVY COUNCIL. 
 
 CA8B. 
 
 Act respecting Assignments and Prefer- 
 ences (20 A. K. 4m). 
 
 Hiildwin v. Kingstone (18 A. R. 63) 16 O. 
 R. 341. 
 
 Bowes v. City of Toronto (6 Gr. 1) 4 Gr. 
 
 480. 
 Cameron v. Bickford (11 A. R. 52). 
 
 Canada Central Ry. Co. v.'MoLaren (8 A. 
 
 R. 564) 32 C. v. 324. 
 Counter v. Macpherson (N. R.) 
 
 De S<juza, in re. (9 O. R. 39). 
 
 Gilmour v. Supple, 5 C. P. 318. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 22 Can. Gaz. 274. 
 17 Can. Gaz. 400 
 
 11 Moo. P. C. 463. 
 6 Can. Gaz. 514. 
 3 Can. Gaz. 321, 346. 
 5 Moo. P. C. 83. 
 
 I Times U R. 597. 
 
 II Moo. P. C. 551 ; 6 
 W. R. 445. 
 
 13 App. Cas. 136. 
 
 1 lMoo.N.S.101;9Jur. 
 (7U. ^ N. S. 339;8L. T.31; 
 J 11 W. R. 444. 
 
 Grand Junction Ry. Co. v. County of 
 
 Peterboro' (13 A. R. 420). 
 Great Western Ry. Co. v. Braid. 
 Itreat Western Ry. Co. v. Fawcett i 
 
 C. L. J. 43). 
 Great Western Ry. Co. v. Commercial 3 Moo. N. S. 295 ; 13 L. 
 
 Bank of Canada (2 £. k A. 285) 22 Q. | T. 105. 
 
 B. 233. I 
 
 Greenshields v. Bamhart (3 Gr. 1) 1 Gr.l9 Moo. P. C. 18; 5 Gr. 
 
 469. I 99. 
 
 Huntington v. Attrill (18 A. R. 136) 17 O. [1893] A. C. 150 ; 62 L. 
 
 R. 245. J. 44. 
 
 International Bridge Co. v. Canada South- 8 App. Cas. 723. 
 
 em Ry. Co. (7 A. R. 226). 
 Jennings v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (15 A. 13 App. Cas. 800 ; .58 L. 
 
 R. 477). j J. 1 ; 59 L. T. 679 ; 37 
 
 W. R. 103 ; 4 Times 
 L. R. 752. 
 Lindsay Petroleum Oil Co. v. Hurd (17 L. R. 5 P. C 221; 22, 
 
 Gr. 115) 16 Gr. 147. W. R. 492. 
 
 Matthews v. Holmes (5 Gr. 1) 3 Gr. 379. 9 Moo. P. C. 413 ; 5 Gr. J 
 
 108. I 
 
 Oliver, in re. 11 Can. Gaz. 294. .Leave to ap|>eal refused. 
 
 Rbsi'lt of Appeal. 
 
 Stands for judgment. 
 
 Re-aiwument orderfd by 
 Jud. Com. whicii w*" 
 not proceeded with. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirme<]. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmetl. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Jiidgment affirmed. 
 
 Peart v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (10 A. R. Can. Gaz. 535. 
 
 191). 
 Powell V. Washburn (N. R.) 2 Moo. P. C. 199. 
 
 iJudgment affirmed. 
 
 I 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Ratte V. Booth (14 A. R. 419) 11 0. R. 491 ; 15 App. Cas. 188 ; 59 L. Judgment afllrmed. 
 
 ■" J. 41; 62 L. T. 198; 
 
 ;« W. R. 737. 
 
 10 O. R, 351. 
 Reg. V. Hodge (7 A. R. 246) 46 Q. B. 141, 
 
 Simpson v. Smythe (1 E. & A. 1,172 ; 2 O. 
 
 S. 1,129). 
 Smart v. Smart 
 
 (Tennant v. Union Bank (19 A. R. 1). 
 
 Toronto, City of, and Toronto Street Ry. 
 Co. in re (20 A. R. 125) 22 O. R. 374. 
 
 9 App. Cas. 117 ; 53 L. Judgment affirmed, 
 
 J. 1 ; 50 L. T. 301 
 7 Moo. P. C. 205. 
 
 [1892] A. C. 425 ; 61 L. 
 J. 38 ; 67 L. T. 198. 
 22 Can. Gaz. 256. 
 
 [1893] A. C. 511. 
 
 Judgpnent affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgement affirmecl. 
 
[OJ 
 
 i^M 
 
 CASES IN THE ONTARIO COURTS CARRIED TO 
 THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Report on Appeal, i Result ok Appeal. 
 
 Aljtll V. Church 26 C. P. 338. 
 
 IS. C. R. 442. 
 
 Adamscn v. Adamson (7 A. R 592) 28 Gr. 12 S. C. R. 5G3. 
 
 226. I 
 
 Archer v. Severn (8 A. R. 725). \S. C. Dig. 875. 
 
 Attv.-Gen. of Canada v. City of Toronto S. C. Dig. 57. 
 (18 A. R. 622) 20 O. R. 19. 
 
 Atty.-Gen. of Ontario v. O'Reilly (6 A. R. ."i S. C. R. 538 sub nom. 
 
 576) 26 Gr. 126. Mercer v. Atty.-Gen. 
 
 uf Ontario. 
 Attv.-Gen. v. Vaughan Road Co. 19 A. 21 S. C. R. 631. 
 
 R. 234 ; 21 O. R. .')07. 
 Badenach v. Slater (8 A. R. 402). jlO S. C. R. 296. 
 
 Ball V. CromptonCorsetCo. (12A. R. 738)138. C. R. 469. 
 
 9 O. R. 228. I 
 
 Bank of Montreal v. Haffner. "J | 
 
 Bank of Montreal v. Worswick (10 A. R. J- S. C. Dig. 526 
 
 592) 3 O. R. 183. j 
 
 Barned s Banking Co. v. Reynolds (3 A. 
 
 R. 371) 36 q. B. 256 ; 40 Q. B. 435. 
 Barton, Township of, v. City of Hamilton 
 
 (17 A. R. 346) 18 O. R. 199. I 
 
 Bate v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. (1.7 A. 18 S. C. R. 697. 
 
 R. 388) 14 O. R. 625. 1 
 
 Beatty v. Neelon (12 A. R. 50) 9 O. R 385.jl3 S. C.R.I. 
 
 Beatty v. North-West Importation Co.!l2S. C. R. 598. 
 (11 A. R. 205) 6 O. R. 300, 
 
 Beaver v. Grand Trunk R" Co. (20 A. R. 
 
 476) 22 O. R. 167. 
 Beckett v. Grand Trunk ^ . Co. (13 A. R. 
 
 174) 8 O. R. 601. 
 
 vS. C. Dig. 170. 
 20S. C. R. 173. 
 
 
 Bell V. Fraser (12 A. R. 1). 
 
 Bell V. Macklin (23 C. L. J. 299). 
 
 Bickford v. Town of Chatham (14 A. R. 
 
 32) 10 O. R. 257. 
 Billiugton v. Provincial Ins. Co. (2 A, R. 
 
 158) 24 Gr. 299. 
 Birkett v. McGuire (7 A. R. 53) 31 C. P. 
 
 430. 
 Brantford, &c., Ry. Co. v. Huffman (18 A. 
 
 R. 415). 
 Brown v. Great Western Ry. Co. (2 A. R. 
 
 64) 40 q. B. 333. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 713. 
 
 13 S. C. R. 546. 
 15 S. C. R. 576. 
 16 S. C. R. 2;J5. 
 3S. C. R. 182. 
 S. C. Dig. 598. 
 19 S. C. R. a36. 
 3S. C. R. 259. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment rever.se<l. 
 
 Judgment reversed, and 
 leave to a])i)eal to Privj' 
 Council refused. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 
 I ijeal, 8 App. Cas. 767. 
 
 'Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 13eal. 12 App. Cas. 589. 
 
 Stands for judgment. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, and 
 leave to api)eal to 
 Privy Council refused. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 I Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 ('(J6S 
 
 Cry.. 
 
 Cum 
 
 Cur 
 
 Davi 
 
 OiUo 
 
 5 
 
 Dixo 
 
 Dono 
 
 Dorh 
 
 Dov( 
 
ED TO 
 
 Appkai.. 
 
 versed. 
 
 inned. 
 
 versed. 
 
 > versed, and 
 Ileal to Privy 
 [used. 
 
 Bversed, but 
 n further ap- 
 p. Cas. 767 . 
 •versed. 
 
 ffinned. 
 
 ffirmod. 
 
 ffinned. 
 ersed. 
 ffirmetl. 
 ■eversed. 
 iffinned. 
 
 ev 
 
 reversed, but 
 >n further ap- 
 Vpn. Cas. 589. 
 juagment. 
 
 affirmed, and 
 api)eal tt> 
 mncil refused, 
 affirmed. 
 
 affirmed. 
 
 affirmed. 
 
 affirmed. 
 
 reversed. 
 
 affirmed. 
 
 affirmed. 
 
 Can's in the Ontario Coiirtx Carried to the Supreme Court. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Bull V. Imiierial Ins. Co. (15 A. R. 421) 14 
 
 O. R. 322. 
 Cameron v. Wait (3 A. R. 175) 27 C. P. 475. 
 
 Campbell v. Kingston & Bath Road Co. 
 (18 A. R. 286) 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 697. 
 S. C. Dig. 332. 
 20 S. C. R. 605. 
 
 Campbell v. McDougail (5 A. R. 503) 266 8. C. R. 502. 
 Gr. 280. 
 
 Rrsult ok Ai'I'KAI,. 
 
 Judgment affirnu'd. 
 •Tudgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affinr.ed. 
 Judgment affimu-d. 
 
 Campbell v. Roche. 
 
 McKinnon v. Roche (18 A. R. 64G). | ; son 
 
 ^ 121 a. C. R. 645 sub iMin. Judgment affimie.l. 
 r Campbell v. Patter- 
 
 Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. v. City of Ottawa 
 (12 A. R. 234) 8 O. R. 183, 201. 
 
 and Mader v 
 McKinnon. 
 12 8. C. R. 365. 
 
 Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. v. Township of|15S. C. R. 219. 
 Cambridge (14 A. R. 2J)9) 11 O. R. 392. 
 
 Cannon, in re Gates v. Cannon, 13 O. R. 
 
 70, 705. 
 Carey v. City of Toronto (11 A. R. 416) 
 
 7 O. R. 195. 
 Cliurch v. Fenton (4 A. R. 159) 28 C. P. 
 
 384. 
 Citizen's Ins. Co. and Henderson tr„ re 
 
 (13 P. R. 70). 
 
 S. C. Dig. 111. 
 US. C. R. 172. 
 5S. C. R. 239. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 Leave granted to ai>- 
 jjeal to Pr. Cinm., but 
 not j)roceeded with. 
 
 Judgment affinuKl. 
 Leave to ap|)eal t«> Pi-. 
 Coun. granted, but not 
 proceedetl witli. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affimnHl. 
 Judgment affiniit-d. 
 
 Clarke & Union Fire Ins. Co. in re (16 A. 
 
 R. 161) 10 G. R. 489 ; 13 A. R. 268 ; 
 
 14 S. C. R- 624. I 
 
 Clou.'^e v. Canada Southern Ry. Co. (11 A. 13 S. C. R. 139. 
 
 R. 287) 4 G. R. 28. 1 
 
 Conmee v. Bond (16 A. R. 398) 15 0. R.LS. C. Dig. 511. 
 
 716. 1 
 
 Connell v. Town of Pre.scott (20 A. R. 49). 22 S. C. R. 147. 
 
 Co.^^rave v. Boyle (5 A. R. 458) 45 Q. B. 32. 6 S . C . R . 165 . 
 
 Co.sgrave Brewing & Malting Co. v. Starrs!l2 S . C. R . 571 . 
 
 (11 A. R. 156) 5 O. R. 189. 
 Crysler v. McKay (2 A. R. 569). 3 S. C. R. 436. 
 
 Cumming v. Landed Banking & Loan Co. 22 S. C. R. 246. 
 
 (19 A. R. 447)20 0. R. 382 :190.R. 426.: 
 Currj- v. Curry (4 A. R. 63) 26 Gr. 1. IS. C. Dig. 778. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 338 «h// nom. Judgment affinui'tl. 
 
 Green v. Citizens'! 
 
 Ins. Co. I 
 
 17 S. C. R. 2CMsith nom. 'Judgment affirni-d. 
 
 Slioolbred v . Clarke. 
 
 Judgment rever.^i'd. 
 Judgment affininil. 
 Judgment affimi'Ml. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment rever.'^ 'il. 
 Tudgment rever. t d. 
 j Judgment reversed. 
 
 i 
 
 Davidson v. Oliver (6 A. R. 595). 
 
 lis. C. R. 166. 
 
 Dillon v. Township of Raleigh (13 A. R.J14 S. C. R. 739. 
 
 53). ! 
 
 Dixon v. Richelieu Navigation Co. (15 A.il8S. C. R. 704. 
 
 R. 647) i 
 
 Donovan v. Herbert (12 A. R. 298) 9 0.iS. C. Dig. 653. 
 
 R. 89. 
 Dorland v. Jones (12 A. R. 543) 7 G. R. 17 
 
 Dover, Township of, v. Town of Chatham 
 
 (11 A. R. 248) 5 O. R. 325. 
 Duggan V. London & Canadian Loan Co. 
 
 (18 A. R. 305) 19 O. R. 272. 
 
 14 S. C.R. 39. 
 12 S. C. R. 321. 
 
 jJndgment affinnod 
 
 by equal division. 
 
 (.Tudgment reversed. 
 
 iJudgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 481, reversed .Tudgment reversed, but 
 byP.C.[1893]A.C.506| restored on further app. 
 
8 
 
 Cases in the Ontario Courts 
 
 Cabr. 
 
 Ill 
 
 Duncan v. Rog«rb (16 A. R. 3) 15 O. R. 609. 
 
 Report on Appeal, i Result or Appeal. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 710. 
 
 22 S. C. R. 241. 
 
 13 S. C. R. 303. 
 
 5S. C. R. 170. 
 13S.C.R. 102. 
 
 Dwyer v. Town of Port Arthur (19 A. R. 
 
 565). 
 Dyment v. Thomion (12 A. R. 659) 9 O. 
 
 R. 566. 
 Klectric Despatch Co. of Toronto v. liell 20S. C. R. 83 
 
 TelephoneCo.(17A.R. 292)170. R,49o 
 Erb V. Great Western Ry. Co. (3 A. R, 
 
 446) 42 Q. B. 90. 
 Erwin v. Canada Southern Ry. Co. (11 A. 
 
 R. 306). 
 Exchange Bank v. Bamett. \ 
 
 Exchange Bank v.Springer(13 A. R. 390)J 
 
 Faulds V. Harper (9 A. R. 537) 2 O. R. 405. 
 
 FerKuaon v. Ferguson (7 A. R. 452) 39 Q. 
 
 B. 232. 
 Fitzgerald v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (4 A. 
 
 R. 601) 28 C. P. 586. 
 Forrestal v. McDonald, 29 Gr. 300. 
 
 i'rey v. Wellington Mutual Ins. Co. (4 A. 
 
 R. 293) 43 Q. B. 102. 
 Gage V. Canada Publishing Co. (11 A. R. 
 
 402) 6 O. R. 68. 
 Gemmill v. Garland (23 C. L. J. 294) 12 
 
 O. R. 139. 
 Gibbons v. McDonald (18 A. R. 159) 19 O. 
 
 R. 290. 
 Godson & City of Toronto, in re (16 A. R. 
 
 452) 16 O. R. 275. 
 Goldsmith v. City of London (23 C. L. J. 
 
 294) 11 O. R. 26. 
 Grand Junction Ry. Co. v. Bickford (23 
 
 Gr. 302). 
 Grand Junction Ry. Co. v. Town of Peter- 
 
 boro' (6 A. R. 339) 45 Q. B. 302. 
 Grant v. Peoples' Loan & Deposit Co. (17 
 
 A. R. 85). 
 Gray v. Richford (1 A. R. 112). 
 
 14 S. C. R. 716. 
 
 lis. C. R. 639. 
 2 S. C. R. 497. 
 
 58. C. R. 204. 
 
 9 S. C. R. 12. 
 
 5 8. C. R. 82. 
 
 US. C. R. 30<i. 
 
 14 8. C. R. 321. 
 
 208. C. R.587. 
 
 188. C. R. 3«i. 
 
 16 8. C. R. 231. 
 
 IS. C. R. 096. 
 
 8 8. C. R. 76. 
 
 18 8. C. R. 262. 
 
 2 8. C. R. 431. 
 
 Grip Printing & Publishing Co. v. Butter-11 S. C. K. 291. 
 
 field (11 A= R. 145). i 
 
 Halton, County of, v. Grand Trunk Ry. 21 S. C. R. 716. 
 
 Co. (19 A. R. 252). | 
 
 llately v. Merchants' Despatch Tran8pf)r-il4 8. C. R. 572. 
 
 tation Co. (12 A. R. 201) 4 O. R. 723. 1 
 Hayes v. Elmsley (19 A. R. 291) 21 O. RlNot yet reporteJ. 
 
 562. i 
 
 Henderson v. Killey (17 A. R. 456) 14 O.ilS S. C. R. 698 mb »jo//j. JudKiiient reversid 
 
 Judgment reversed 
 
 in part. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 I Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmtnl. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 .Judgment affiniiid. 
 
 I Judgment reversetl. 
 .Judgment reverst^l. 
 
 jJudgment affinneil. 
 
 , Judgment affirmed. 
 
 I 
 
 iJudginent reverstf? 
 
 Judgment affii-nud. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affinne<L 
 
 .Judgment afl?nne<]. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment revernKl. 
 
 ! Judgment affimtt-d. 
 
 Judgment affimuMl. 
 
 Judgment rever*!* <], 
 
 Judgment revt/rsed. 
 
 Judipuent affirmed. 
 
 i 
 
 Judgment affiniK d. 
 
 Judgment reverswl. 
 
 R. 137. 
 Heward v. O'Donohoe (18 A. R. 529). 
 
 Hislop v. Township of McGillivray (15 A. 
 R. 687) 12 O. R. 749. 
 
 Hobbs v. Guardian Assur. Co. 
 Hobbs V. Northern Assur. Co. (11 A 
 
 741) 7 O. R. 634 ; 8 O. R. 343. 
 Howard v. Bickford (17 C. L. J. 158) 
 
 ..} 
 
 Osborne v. Henderson 
 19 8. C. R. 341. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 479. 
 
 ■i 
 
 12 8 C. R. 631. 
 S. C. Dig. 286. 
 Howland v. Dominion Bank (15 P. R. 56). 22 S. C. R. 130. 
 
 Judgment revei»e<l. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 I 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Moore 
 A. 
 I Moore 
 652 
 
 Mo.xley 
 
Carried to the Supreme Court. 
 
 9 
 
 Case. 
 
 Rkport on Appeal. 
 
 RKHCLT or AlTEAL. 
 
 Hunter v. Carrick (10 A. R. 449) 28 Gr. 11 S. C. R. 300. 
 
 489. 
 Huson V. South Norwich (19 A. R. 343). ,21 S. C. R. 609. 
 
 Jellett V. Anderson (7 A. R. 341) 27 Gr. 9 8. t'. R. 1 
 
 411. 
 Johnson v. Western Ins. Co. (4 A. R. 281). 
 
 Johnston v. Oliver, 3 O. R. 26. 
 
 4S. C. R. 216. 
 S. C. Dig. 6.51. 
 18 S. C. R. 696. 
 
 Jones V. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (16 A. R 
 37). 
 
 Keefer v. McKay (9 A. R. 117) 29Gr. 162.J13S. C. R. aintub nom. 
 
 I Merchants' Bank v 
 I Keefer. 
 
 Kelly V. Imperial Loan Co. (11 A. R. 526). 11 JS. C. *R. 516. 
 
 Kloeffer v. Gardner (14 A. R. 60) 10 O. R, 
 
 416. 
 Langtry v. Dumoulin (7 O. R. 644) 7 O. 
 
 R. 499. 
 Lawlor v. Lawlor (0 A. R. 312). 
 
 Lemay v. McRae (16 A. R. 348) 16 O. R. 
 
 307. 
 Lett V. St. Lawrence & Ottawa Ry. Co. 
 
 (11 A. R. 1)10. R. 545. 
 
 Long V. Hancock (12 A. R. 137) 7 O. R. 
 
 154). 
 Maclennan v. Gray (16 A. R. 224) 16 (>. 
 
 R, 321. 
 Magee v. Gilinour (17 A. R. 27) 17 O. R. 
 
 620. 
 Maritime Bank v. Stewart (13 P. R. 491) 
 
 13 P. R. 86, 262. 
 Marsh v. Webb (19 A. R. 564) 21 O. R. 
 
 281 
 Marshall v. McRae (17 A. R. 139) 16 O. 
 
 R. 495. 
 Mead v. O'Kot^fe (15 A. R. 103). 
 
 Merchants' Bank v. Lucas (15 A. R. 573) 
 
 13 O. R, 520. 
 Merchants' Bank v. McKay, 12 O. R. 498. 
 
 Merchants' Bank v. Moflfatt (5 O. R. 122). 
 
 Miller v. Confederation Life Assoc. (14 A. 
 
 R. 218) 11 O. R. 120. 
 Milloy V. Kerr (3 A. R. 350) 43 Q. B. 78. 
 
 Molson's Bank v. Halter (16 A. R. 323). 
 
 Moore v. Connecticut Mutual Ins. Co. (3 
 
 A. R. 230) 41 Q. B. 497. 
 Moore v. Jackson (19 A. R. 483) 20 O. R. 
 
 652. 
 Mo.xley v. Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. (14 A. 
 
 R. 309). 
 
 15 S. C. R. 390. 
 IBS. C. R. 238. 
 10 S. C. R. 194. 
 18 S. C. R. 280. 
 lis. C. R. 422. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 532. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment as to publica- 
 tion of by-law atfinned ; 
 stands for argument on 
 Constituti'n'I riuextion. 
 
 Judgment reverned. 
 
 Judgment atfinned. 
 Judgement afliniied. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affinne<], and 
 leave to appeal to Privy 
 Council refused. 
 
 Judgment reveri*d. 
 
 188. C. R. 553 sub nom. | Judgment reversed 
 
 Gray v. Coughlin. 
 18 S. C. R. 579. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 105. 
 Not yet reported. 
 19 S. C. R. 10. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Appeal quashed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 596 «u& nom. Judgment reversed. 
 O'Keefe v. Curran. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 704. 
 15 S. C. R. 672. 
 lis. C. R. 46. 
 14 S. C. R. 330. 
 8S. C. R. 474. 
 18 S. C. R. 88. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affiruKil. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 Judgment affirnieri. 
 
 6 S. C. R. »)34, afF. byJudgment reverswl. 
 
 P. C. 6App.Ca8.644.i 
 22S. C. R. 210. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 145. 
 
 I Judgment reversed. 
 
 I 
 
 Judgment affiniioi. 
 
i ' 
 
 I ; j 
 
 1 1 :^ 
 
 if I 
 
 M 
 
 10 
 
 Cases in the Ontario Courts 
 
 Cabk. 
 
 Murphy v. Kingston & I'einbroke Ry. Co. 
 
 Rbport on Appeal. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 582. 
 
 2S. C. R. 364. 
 
 rpiiv V. Kingston i 
 
 11 O. R. 320, 5S2. 
 Murray v. Canada Central Ry. Co. (7 A.|8S. C. R. 313. 
 
 R.' 04fi). 
 MaclJunaM v. (leorgian Bay Lumber Co. 
 
 (2 A. R. 3G) 24 Gr. Ml 
 A[acD()ugall, in re (15 A. R. ViO) 13 O. R. 
 
 204. 
 
 MeCra« v. Whyte (7 A. R. 103). 
 
 Rkmi'LT ok Appeal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 203sub noni. Judgment reversed. 
 MacDougall v. Law 
 
 >ouga 
 Soc'y of 17 nper Can. 
 OS. C. R. 22. 
 
 lis. C. R. 107. 
 
 McDonald v. Crombie (10 A. R. 92) 2 O, 
 
 11. 243. 
 McDf.nald v. McCall (12 A. R. 5!)3) 9 0.13 S. C. R. 247. 
 
 R. 185. 
 Mr- 1>. maid v. McDonald (17 A. R. 192). 
 
 McDonald v. Worthington (7 A. R. 531). 
 
 218. C. R. 201. 
 OS. C. R. 327. 
 
 McGugan v. McGugan (19 A. R. 56) 21 0. 21 S. C. R. 267. 
 R. 289. 
 
 Mclntvre v. McCracken (1 A. R. 1) S/ Q. 1 S. C. R. 479. 
 
 13. 422. 
 McKenna v. McName(> (14 A. R. 339). |15 S. C. R. 311. 
 
 McKenzie v. Kittridge (27 C. P. 65) 24 C.'4 S. C. R. 368. 
 
 P. 1, 145. 
 McLaren v. Caldwell (6 A. R. 456) 5 A 
 
 R. 303. 
 McL.-an v. Garland (10 A. R. 405) 32 C 
 
 P. .-.24. 
 McMillan v. Barton (19 A. R. 602). 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Apjieal dismissed ; deci- 
 sion of Court of Ap[»eal 
 not t<i be interfenid 
 with even if appealable. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affinned . 
 
 8 S. C. R. 435 ; afF. by Judgment reversed, but 
 P. C. 9 App. Cas. 392. ; restored on further app. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 13 S. C. R. 306 
 20 S. C. R. 404. 
 
 McMillan v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (15 A.II6 S. C. R. 543. 
 R. 14) 12 O. R. 103. I 
 
 Mc<,»ueen v. Phoenix Mutual Ins. Co. (4^4 S. C. R. 660. 
 
 A. 11. 280) 29 C. P. 511. j 
 
 Nasmitli v. Manning (5 A. R. 126) 29C. 5S. C. R. 417. 
 
 P. -M. 
 
 Neil! V. Travellers' Ins. Co. (7 A. R. 570)12 8. C. R. 55. 
 
 31 C. P. .394. I 
 
 Nelles V. White, 29 Gr. 338. |ll 8. C. R. 587. 
 
 I 
 New Hamburg v. County of Waterloo (20:22 8. C. R. 296. 
 
 A. R. 1) 22 O. R. 193. 
 Nicholls V. Gumming (26 C. P. 323) 25 C.I 1 8. C. R. 395. 
 
 P. 169. i 
 
 North Ontario Election Case (Hodge. E1.J4 8. C. R. 430. 
 
 CJas. 785). 
 North York Election Case (32 C. P. 458). 8. C. Dig. 682. 
 
 Nor veil v. Canada Southern Ry. Co. (9 A. 8. C. Dig. 34. 
 
 R. 310). 
 O'Donohoe, in re (14 P. R. 317) 12 P. R. 19 S. C. R. 356 ««6. now. 
 
 612. O'Donohoe v. Beatty. 
 
 O'Meara v. City of Ottawa (15 A. R. 75)14 8. C. R. 742. 
 
 11 O. R. 603. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed, and 
 leave to appeal to Piivy 
 Council retuaed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Leave to api>eal to Pri vy 
 Council granted but not 
 l)rccedeed with. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal dismissed by con- 
 sent. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
Carried to the Supreme Court. 
 
 11 
 
 Api'kai-. 
 
 finned, 
 firmed. 
 Krme<l. 
 verHcd. 
 
 iirmed. 
 
 !inned. 
 
 [linued. 
 
 HRnned. 
 
 [finned. 
 
 lissed ; deci- 
 urt of Apf jeal 
 le interfemd 
 if appealable. 
 Bvenied. 
 
 fBrmed. 
 
 ffinned. 
 
 •eversed, but 
 ti further app. 
 verst'd. 
 
 firmed. 
 
 reversed, and 
 )peal to Privy 
 fuHcd. 
 evei'sed. 
 
 affirmed. 
 )pealtoPrivy 
 anted but not 
 with, 
 {firmed. 
 
 ifirmed. 
 
 eversed. 
 
 eversed. 
 
 eversed. 
 
 nissed by con- 
 
 •eversed. 
 
 .ffirmed. 
 
 .{firmed. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 I 
 
 Ontario Loan & Debenture Co. v. HobbajlS S. C. R. 483 
 
 (1«A. R. 2.55)15 0. R. 440. 
 O'SuUivan v. Harty (10 A. R. 7G). 
 
 O'Sullivan v. Lake (15 A. R. 711) 15 O. R. 
 544. 
 
 Pardee v. Lloyd (5 A. R. 1) 26 Gr. 375. 
 
 Page V. Austin (7 A. R. 1) 30 C. P. 108. 
 
 lis. C. R. 322. 
 16S. C. R. 636. 
 
 Rehi'lt ok Ai'I'kai.. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal C]|ua8hed, bi>ing 
 from a judgment rivj-r 
 in exercise of discretK! .. 
 S. C. Dig. 35 nuh nam. .Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Bickf ord v . Lloyd . 
 10 8. C. R. 132. 
 
 Pardons v. CitiKans' Ins. Co. (4 A. R. 96) 
 43 C^. B. 2bi. 1 I 
 
 Par.sc.ns v. Queen Ins. Co. (4 A. R. 103) 43 C 
 q. B. 271. I J 
 
 4S. C. R. 215. 
 
 Parsons v. Standard Ins. Co. (4 A. R. 320) 5 S, C. R. 233. 
 
 43 Q. B. 603. 
 Partlo V. Todd (14 A. R. 444) 120. R. 171 
 
 Peck V. Powell. 
 
 Powell V. Peck (8 A. R.498) 26 Gr. 322. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 196. 
 lis. C. R. 494. 
 
 Peek V. Shields (6 A. R. 639) 31 C. P. 112|8 S. C. R. 579. 
 
 Peterkin v. McFarlane (9 A. R. 429). 
 
 Petrie v. Guelph Lumber Co. (11 A. R. 
 
 336) 2 O. R. 218. 
 Plumb V. SteinhoiT (11 A. R. 788) 2 O. R. 
 
 614 
 Purcell V. Bergin (20 A. R. .535). 
 
 Purdom v. Nichol (15 A. R. 244). 
 
 Reg. v, Amer (42 Q. B. 391). 
 
 13 S. C. R. 677 sub nom. 
 Rose v. Peterkin. 
 
 US. C. R. 450. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 739. 
 
 15S.C. R. 610 «««,,, fwt 
 I'urdom v. Baechler. 
 2S. C. R. 592. 
 
 Reg. V. County of Wellington (17 A. R.il9S. C.R. .^IOsm?,. ?io»i. 
 421) 17 O. R. 61.5. Quirt v . The Queen . 
 
 Reg. V. Howland (14 A. R. 184) 11 O. R. 
 
 6.33. 
 Reg. V. St. Catharines' Milling Co. (13 A. 
 
 R. 148) 10 U. R. 196. 
 Reg. V. Tayh.r (36 q. B. 183, 218). 
 
 Robinson v. Harris (19 A. R. 134) 21 O. 
 
 R. 43. 
 Rose V. Hickey (3 A. R. 309). 
 
 Rosenberger v. Grand Tnmk Ry. Co. (8 
 
 A. R. 482) 32 C. P. 349. 
 Ryan v. Clarkson (16 A. R. 311). 
 
 Ryan v. Ryan (4 A. R. 563) 29 C. P. 449. 
 
 Samo v. Gore District Mutual Ins. Co. (1 
 
 A. R. 545) 26 C. P. 405. 
 Sanderson v. McKercher (13 A. R. 561). 
 
 Schroeder v. Rooney (11 A. R. 673). 
 
 Scott V. Benedict (22 C. L. J. 43) 5 O. R. 1. 
 
 Judgment affirme<l. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal, 7 App. Ca.s. 96. aH 
 to validity of Ontario 
 Insurance Act. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 .Tudgment wver-tcd in 
 Peckv. Powell. Attinn- 
 ed in Powell v. Peck. 
 
 .Judgment affinned by 
 equal division. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 .Tudgment affirmed. 
 Stands for judguicnt. 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 ApjHial quashftl. 
 Judgment affirnitd. 
 .Judgment reversi-'l. 
 
 16S.C. R. 1{)7 sttb now. 
 
 in re O'Brien . 
 13 S. C. R. .577 ; aff. by Judgment affirmt'd 
 
 P. C. 14 App. Ca.s. 46 
 IS. C. R.65 
 
 21 S. C. R. 390. 
 S.C. Dig. .534. 
 9 S. C. R. 311. 
 17 S. C. R. 251. 
 5 S. C. R. 387. 
 2 S. C. R. 411. 
 15 S. C. R. 296. 
 S. C. Dig. 403. 
 14 S. C. R. 735. 
 
 ApjK'al qua-shed. 
 .Judgment rever.-fd. 
 •Judgment affirnnil. 
 •Judgment affirmed. 
 .Judgment affinm-l. 
 Judgment rever.-t d. 
 Judgment reverswl. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirm(>d. 
 
12 
 
 Cases in ths Ontario Courts 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Scribner v. Kinloch (12 A. R. 367) 20. R. 
 
 265. 
 Seymour v. Lyncii (14 A. R. 738) 7 O. R. 
 
 471. 
 8hairp v. Lakefiela I uinber Co. (17 A. R. 
 
 322). 
 Shannon v. HaatingH Mtitual Ihh. Co. (2 
 
 A. R. 81) 2« C. P. 380. 
 •Sibbald V. Ciraml Trunk Ry. Co, 
 Trfmayne v. (trand Trunk Ry, 
 
 R. 184) 1!» (). R. 164. 
 Smart, in re (12 1*. R. 635) 12 1 
 
 Smith V. Goldie (7 A. R. 628. 
 
 Co. ^ 
 
 yr.Co.(18A. ^ 
 
 P. R. 312, 435. 
 
 Report on Appeal. Result or Appeal. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 77. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 341. 
 19 S. C. R. 657. 
 2S. C. R. 394. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 259. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 396. 
 
 OS. C. R. 46. 
 
 15 S.C. R. 69. 
 
 8 S. C. R. 512. 
 
 21 S. C. R. 305. 
 
 3 S. C. R. 641. 
 
 Smith V. Ltmdon Ins. Co. (14 A. R. 328) 
 
 11 O. R. 38. 
 Smith V. Merchants' Bank (8 A. R. 15) 28 
 
 Gr. 629. 
 Sombra, Township of, v. Township of 
 
 Chatham (18 A. R. 252). 
 South Ontario Election Case (llodg. £1. 
 
 Cas. 751), i 
 
 Stammers v. O'DohoIkk; (8 A. R. 101) 28|ll S. C. R. a58. 
 
 Gr. 207. ; 
 
 Stamlard Fire Ins. Co. in re Customs Ca8el2 S. C. R. 644. 
 
 (12 A. R. 486) 7 O. R. 20 », 448. | 
 
 Standly v. Perry (2 A. R. 195) 23 Gr. 507.|3 S. C. R. :i56. 
 
 Stephens v. Gordon (19 A. R. 176). |22 S. C. R. 61. 
 
 Stevenson v. Davis (19 A. R. 591) 21 O. JNot yet reixjrted . 
 
 R.642. / j 3^ » 
 
 Stewart v. Lees, 24 Gr. 433. IS. C. Dig. 93. 
 
 St. John V. Rykert (4 A. R. 213) 26 Gr.lO S. C. R. 278. 
 
 249. 
 Sutherland v. Cox (15 A. R. 541) 6 O. R. S. C. Dip. 9. 
 
 506. 
 Taylor v. Taylor (1 A. R. 245) 23 Gr. 496, 
 
 Judfnnent afflnned. 
 
 iJudfnnent affirmed by 
 
 equal diviHitm. 
 jJudgment affinued. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashe<l for not 
 being brought in time. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Thorold v. Neelon (18 A. R. 658) 20 O. R.|Not yet reported. 
 
 86. 
 Trust & Loan Co. v. Lawrason (6 A. R. 
 
 286) 45 Q. B. 176. 
 Trust & Loan Co. v. Ruttan (1 A. R. 26). 
 
 32 O. B 222. 
 Union Fire Ins. Co. in re (13 A. R. 268) 
 
 10 O. R. 489. 
 Victoria, County of, v. County of Peter- 
 
 boro' (15 A. R. 617) 15 O. R. 446. 
 Virgo and City of Toronto, in re (20 A. R. 
 
 435). 
 Vogel V. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. 
 Morton v. G. T. Ry. Co. (10 A. R. 162) 
 
 2 0.R.197. 
 Wallbridge v. Gaujot (14 A. R. 460) 
 
 2 S. C. R. 616 sub. nam. 'Judgment reversed. 
 Taylor v. Wallbridge. | 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 •} 
 
 10 S. C. R. 679. 
 1 S. C. R. 564. 
 14 S. C. R. 624. 
 S. C. Dig. 558. 
 
 11 S. C. R. 612. 
 
 Walmsley v. Griffith (10 A. R. 327). 
 
 ! i 
 
 Warin v. London &; Canadian Loan Co. 
 
 (12 A. R. 327) 7 O. R. 706. 
 Wamockv. Kloepfer(15A.R.324)140.R.288 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversetJ. 
 
 i 
 
 I Judgment affirmed. 
 
 i 
 
 Stands for judgment. 
 
 I 
 
 i Judgment affirmed. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 650 sub nom. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Palmer v. Wallbridge! 
 13 S. C. R. 434. ! Judgment affirmed. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 232. 
 18 S. C. R. 701. 
 
 iJudgment affinntd. 
 J Judgment affinned. 
 
Carried to the Suprenie Court. 
 
 18 
 
 f Appeal. 
 
 Sniied. 
 
 firiiie<l by 
 
 ion. 
 
 Hnued. 
 
 Krnied. 
 
 Rnned. 
 
 Iietl for not 
 ight in time, 
 versed. 
 
 Rrmed. 
 
 versed. 
 
 versed. 
 
 firmed. 
 
 Rrmed. 
 
 firmed. 
 
 firmed, 
 finned, 
 versetl. 
 
 firmed. 
 
 finned. 
 
 firmed. 
 
 sversetl. 
 
 iversed. 
 
 finned. 
 
 ! versed. 
 
 iversed. 
 
 [firmed. 
 
 idgment. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Report on Appkal. 
 
 Waterous Engine Works Co. v. Town of 21 S. C. R. 686. 
 
 Palmerston (19 A. R. 47) 20 O. R. 411. 
 Watt V. City of London (19 A. R. 676). 22 S. C, R. 300. 
 
 West v. Corporation of Parkdale. 'j 12 S, 0. R. 250 ; affirmed 
 
 Carroll v. Cor|K»ration of Parkdale (12 A. > i by P. C. 12 A«p. Cas. 
 
 R. 393) 7 <). R. 270 ; 8 O. R. 5!». J 602. 
 Wett Huron Election Case (1 O. R. 433). 8 S. C. R. 126. 
 
 West NorthumlR-rland Election Case (1 10 S. C. R. r»36. 
 
 Ont. El. Castf 32). I 
 
 Western Assur. Co. v. Ontario Coal Cf). 
 
 (19 A. R. 41) 20 O. R. 25»5 ; 19 O. R. 462. 
 Whiting V. Hovey (13 A. R. 7) 9 0. R. 
 
 314. 
 Wiley V. Smith (1 A. R. 179.) 
 
 Rkhvlt oi- Appkai.. 
 
 Wilkins v. McLean (13 A. R. 467) 10 O. 
 
 R. 68. 
 Williams v. Corby (3 A. R. 626. 
 
 Wright V. Bell (18 A. R. 25). 
 
 Wright V. London Life Assur. Co. (6 A. 
 
 R. 218) 29 0. P. 221. 
 Wright V. Synod of Huron (9 A. R. 411) 
 
 29 Gr. 348. 
 Wyld V. Liverpool, London &, Globe Ins. 
 
 Co. (23 Gr. 442) 21 Or. 468. 
 York, County of, v. Toronto Gravel Co. 
 
 (11 A. R. 765) 3 O. R. 584. 
 Young V. Midland Railway (19 A. R. 265) 
 
 16 O. R. 738. 
 
 21 S. C. R. .«3. 
 14 S. C. R. 516. 
 2 S. C. R. 1. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 22. 
 
 7 S. C. R. 470. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 880 sub nom. 
 
 Houghton v. Bell. 
 5 S. C. R. 466. 
 
 11 S. C. R. 95. 
 1 S. C. R. 604. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 517. 
 
 22 S. C. R. 190. 
 
 Judgment affinne<l. 
 Judgment affirme«l. 
 Judgment reversetl. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reverse*!. 
 
 Judgment affirnie*!. 
 
 Judgment affirme<l. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgement reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment aflSnne<i. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 bv equal division. 
 Judgment affirmeil. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 [firmed. 
 Sirmed. 
 (firmed. 
 Kinntd. 
 (finned. 
 
[I-*] 
 
 CASKS IN THE COUKT OF CHANCERY FOH 
 
 ONTAIUO CAKKIED TO THE COUKT 
 
 OF APPEAL. 
 
 Case. 
 
 AIhIIv. MflMMTKondTCJr. 23). 
 Adiuiioun V. AdiuiiMon (L'N (ir. 2*J<i). 
 Alldii V. MuTiiviHh (!.'« (ir. r,.1!l). 
 AmliTHon V. Bell (LtMJr. 4r>'J). 
 Arkrll V, Wilw.n (r. (ir. 470). 
 AnuiUl V. Mclifim (4 (Jr. 337). 
 Arniii V. Ammln'l (15 (Jr. 701). 
 
 Rei'oht on Appe.\i,. 
 
 Rksilt ov Aitkai., 
 
 18 (Jr. 437. 'Judt^iiu'iit attlrined. 
 
 7 A. R. .')!»2. nff. by Hup. •riulginciit Hftirnu-d. 
 
 ct. 12 s. c. R, :m. , 
 
 8 A. R. 440. Jiulgiiiciit reverHfd. 
 8 A. R. 531. 
 7 (ir. 270. 
 OGr. 242. 
 17 (ir. 1(13. 
 
 .Judgment nttirmed. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 •Judgment reversed. 
 
 'Judgment reversed <>ii 
 j re-hearing. 
 
 Att.v.-(;en, V. (irasset (5 (5r. 412) (GGr.itUir. 200; 8 (ir. 130. {Judgment aflirme<l in 
 4Sri). I both cases. 
 
 Atty.-den. v. Walkir (2."» Gr. 233). 3 A. R. 1»5. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Atty.-fien. *>f Ontfirio v. International (5 A . R. 537. Judgment reversed. 
 
 Bridge Co. (2S dr. Cm). 1 I 
 
 Atry. (Sen. of (Jntario v. O'Reilly (20(ir. ,0 A. R. 57(5; reversed Judgment affirmed. 
 '12(5). i hy H\i\>. Ct. xiih tioiii. , 
 
 Mercer v. Atty.-(ien. i 
 5 .S.(;.R..'>;<8; restored! 
 bv P C. 8 App. Cas.j 
 707. 
 Bank of Montreal v. llojikins (OGr. 495). 2 E. & A. 458. 
 
 Bank of Montreal v. Thomson (9 Gr. 51). 2 K. & A. 239. 
 Bank of Toronto v. Fanning (17 Gr. 514). 18 (ir. 391. 
 
 Bank of Upix-r Can.-vda \. Bcatty (9 Gr. 2 E. & A. 502. 
 
 :!21). i 
 
 Bank of Ui»iier Canada v. Thomas (9 Gr.;2 E. & A. 502. 
 
 Ml). 
 Barker v. Eccles (17 (ir. 031). 
 
 Barnhart v. Patterson (1 (ir. 459). 
 
 Beekitt v. Wragg (0 (ir. 454). 
 Bell V. Lee(28Gr. 1.50). 
 
 18 Gr. 440, 523. 
 
 3 Gr. 1, sub num. Green- 
 shields V. Patterson ; 
 affirmed by P. C. 
 
 7 Gr. 220. 
 
 8 A. R. 185. 
 
 Billington v. Provmcial Ins. Co. (24 Gr. |2A.R.159, aflf. by Sup, 
 
 299). 
 Black V, Black (9 (ir. t03) 
 
 Ct. 3 S. C. R. 182. 
 i2 E. & A. 419. 
 
 I Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment afHrmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 •Judgment reversed. 
 •Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 •Judgment reversed. 
 
 •Judgment reversed in 
 
 part. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
CtftteM in Court of Chamccry CtDTied ttt Court of Appntl. 15 
 
 r.\Hii 
 
 RiroKT ON Ai'PKAi.. I Kkhult or .\fi-n.\i.. 
 
 FOU 
 
 !■• Al'I'KAI.. 
 
 [irnii'd. 
 
 HniH'd . 
 
 verMt'd. 
 
 Hrmed. 
 
 Hnned. 
 
 versed. 
 
 jversed <'ii 
 
 finned in 
 
 Rrmed. 
 
 versed. 
 
 [irincd. 
 
 versed, 
 linncd. 
 irnied. 
 verseci. 
 tinned, 
 irmed. 
 inned. 
 
 versed, 
 versed in 
 versed, 
 versed. 
 
 Rluke V. Kirk|>atrick (27 Or. m). 
 
 fl A. R. 212. 
 
 Rtnilton V. Cliurch Hoc. Diocewi of Torc»nt«> 15 Or. 450. 
 
 {lH'.T.VZi). 
 IJown V. West (1 O. H. 287). jl E. * A. 117 
 
 Box V. Provincial Ins. Co. (15Gr. 337,562). IH Or. 2S0. 
 
 ]{n)wn V. KingMnill (1 O. S. 172). 
 
 Buchnnan v. Smith (17 (Jr. 208). 
 
 nuclinnaii v. Tiffany (1 Or. iW). 
 
 Hutler v. Church (Ifi Or. 206). 
 
 •IJiitler v. Standard Ins. Co. (20 (ir. 341). 4 A. R. IVJl 
 
 Caldwell v. Hall (i) V. C. L. J. 141). 8 U. C. L. J. 93. 
 
 Cameron v. Campbell (27 Or. 307). 
 
 Ciimeron v. Kerr (7 P. U. 2«>5). 
 
 CamplM-ll V. MtDougall ('-'« (Jr. ;feO). 
 
 IK. &A. WHguh ,um. 
 
 Hntwn V. Smart 
 18 (ir. 41. 
 
 1 Or. 257. 
 
 18 Or. 1«.M). 
 
 Il8 C. L. J. 273. 
 
 3 A. R. -M). 
 
 5 A. R. .■.():< :atr. by Sup. 
 Ct. <i S. ( ". R. rH>2. 
 Civn.'ulftFire& Marine Ins. Co. v. Western 5 A. R. 244. 
 
 \ssur. Co. CJCiir. 2t'4). 
 Carn'-n v. Toronto Com. Exchange (27 5 A. R. SOS. 
 
 (Jr. 23). 
 ( liandler v. Ford (O Or. fiO"). t? <Jr . 85. 
 
 I 
 Cliiniiolm, /« /•«• (17 Or. 403). 18 (Jr. Ii;7. 
 
 Cliisholm V. Sheldon (2 Or. 178) 1 Or. 108. 3 dr. (Ju5. 
 
 Commercial Rank v. Bank of Upper 7 Or. 423. 
 
 Canada (7 (Jr. 2.*iO). 
 Cotton V. Corby (7 Or. 50). 
 
 Craig v. Craig (24 Or. .573K 
 Crii)i.en v. Ogilvie(15 Or. 490). 
 CrcK.ks V. Torrance (6 Or. 518). 
 Curry v. Curry (2G Or. 1). 
 Davidson v. Boomer (17 Or. 509). 
 Davidson v. McOuire (27 Or. 483). 
 Denison v. Denison (17 Or. 219). 
 Dilke V. Douglas (2(; Or. 99). 
 
 8 Or. 1)8. 
 
 2 A. R. 583. 
 
 18 Or. 2.'>3. 
 
 8 Or. 220. 
 
 i4 A. R. •).•? ; aff. bv Stip. 
 1 Ct. S. ( '. Dig. 778. 
 18 Or. 475. 
 
 |7A. R. 98. 
 
 il8Gr. 41, re-hearing. 
 
 15 A. R. (iS. 
 
 Direct Cable Co. v. Dominion Telegraph 8 A. R. 41(5. 
 
 Co. (28 Or. 048). | 
 
 Dominion Loan .Soc. v. Darling (27 Or. 68). 5 A. R. 57(5. 
 
 Duff v. Canada Mutual Fire Ins. Co. (27(5 A. R. 238. 
 Or. 3!ll). ) 
 
 Judgment n'ver^fd. 
 
 Judgment uh.rmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmi-<l. 
 
 Judgment revered. 
 
 Judgment revi r.»'d. 
 
 Judgment atKniied 
 
 on re-heariiig. 
 Judgment attiniit d. 
 
 Judgment atHrmed. 
 
 Judgment afiirnii d. 
 
 Tudgment attirnu d. 
 
 Judgment attirm* •!. 
 
 Judgment aftirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversul. 
 
 Judgment affiniied. 
 
 Judgment nflirnitHl. 
 
 Judgment, n vt'r.«'<<l. 
 
 Judgment atfinned. 
 
 Judgment reverse d. 
 
 Jtidgment attiniu d. 
 
 Judgment aftirnu d. 
 
 Judgment re\ er.-ie«l. 
 
 Judgment aHirnie<l. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment affiniK <1. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Tudgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment reverse<J. 
 
 Judgment affiniie<l. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 I 
 
i 
 
 16 
 
 Gases in the Court of C/i/incery. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 1 Rar«j«T OS 
 
 Appeal. 
 
 Rbsult of Appeal. 
 
 Dumblev. Dumble (2!) Gr. 274). 
 
 .< A R 47« 
 
 
 1 Judg^menu reversed. 
 
 Dundafl, Town of, v. Hamilton & Milton 
 Road Co. (17 Gr. 31). 
 
 l^ *iT 311. 
 
 
 iJudf<inent reversed. 
 
 Earle v. Mc Alpine (27 Gr. 161). 
 
 t> A R 145. 
 
 
 Judfnnent affirmed. 
 
 Emmett v, Quinn (27 Gr. 420). 
 
 r A. R 3m 
 
 
 IJudgment reversed. 
 
 Ewart V. Steven (16 Gr. 193). 
 
 IS Gr. 35 
 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 T- _1 __ A \ 
 
 Georgian Bay Trans. Co. v. Fisher (27 -> A. R- 3SS. 
 
 (5r. 34«). 
 Gilleland v. Wadsworth (23 Gr. h^7). 1 A R. *« 
 
 Glass V. Hope (14 Gr. 484). 
 
 il6 Gr. tSt 
 
 Goyeau v. Great Western Ry. Co, (25 Gr. 3 A. R. 412. 
 
 62). 
 Grand Junction Ry. Co. v. Bickford (123 Gr. 3(e. 
 
 L. J. N. S. 180). 
 Grant v. Brown (12 Gr. 52). jl3 Gr. 256. 
 
 Gray v. Springer (5 Gr. 242). 
 Graves v. Smith (6 Gr. 306). 
 
 7 Gr. 27«. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgement reversed. 
 
 Great Western Ry. Co. v. DesjardiiM»3 E. k. A. 330. 
 
 Canal Co. (9 Gr. 503). 
 Green v. Provincial Ins. Co. (26 Gr. 3&4). 4 A R. 521. 
 
 f2E. & A. 9 twb nom. Judgment affirmed. 
 HfAJcrran v. Graves, 
 
 Greet v. Citizens' Ins. Co. ) 
 
 Greet V. Royal Ins. Co. (27 Gr. 121). / 
 
 5 A. R. sue. 
 
 Greet v. Mercantile Ins. Co. (27 Gr. 121). 5 A. R. 5(96. 
 
 Griffith V. Brown (26 Gr. 503). 
 Hart V. McQuesten (21 Gr. 242). 
 Hetnan v. Dewar (17 Gr. 638). 
 Henrihan v. Gallagher (9 Gr. 488). 
 Hill v. Rutherford (9 Gr. 207) 
 Holmes V. Matthew.s (3 Gr . 37'.>). 
 Hunter v. Carriok (28 Gr. 489). 
 
 5 A. R. 303. 
 
 •23 Gr. 133. 
 
 li Gr. 438 
 
 -» E. A A 338. 
 
 9 r. C. L. J. 172. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 jJudgment affirmed. 
 
 IJudgment reversed. 
 
 I 
 
 i 
 
 IJudgment affirmed. 
 
 i Judgment reversed. 
 
 I Judgment reversed. 
 
 IJudgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 5Gr. 1, *IL bv Pr. Coun. ; Judgment reversed. 
 
 9M«». P*C. 413. 
 li>A R- 449. aflF. by. 
 -Sop. Ct. II S. C. R 
 300. 
 International Bridge Co. v. Canada South- 7 A. R. 236. 
 ernRy. Co. (28 Gr. 114). 
 
 Jellett V. Anderson (27 Gr. 411). 
 
 7 A. R 341; rev. by 
 3«pLCt.9S. C.R 1. 
 
 Jes-Hup v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (28 Gr. 7 A. R. 128. 
 
 583). 
 Joseph V. Heaton (5 Gr. 636). 1 E. ft A. 292 ««& nom. 
 
 ; Topfkag V. Joseph. 
 Kay v. Wilson (24 Gr. 212). yS A. R. 13S. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Parkt 
 
OF Appkal. 
 
 Carried to the Court of Appeal, 
 
 17 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Rki'ort on Appeal. ! Result of Appeal. 
 
 reversed, 
 reversed. 
 
 affirmed, 
 reversed, 
 reversed, 
 reversed. 
 ; reversed. 
 ; affirmed. 
 1 reversed, 
 t affirmed, 
 t reversed, 
 t reversed, 
 t affirmed, 
 it reversed, 
 t affirmed, 
 t reversed. 
 
 affirmetl. 
 it reversed, 
 it reversed, 
 it affirmed, 
 it affirmed, 
 it affirmed, 
 it reversed, 
 it reversed. 
 
 it affirmed. 
 
 at affirmed, but 
 ?d on further ap- 
 
 nt reversed. 
 
 nt reversed. 
 
 nt affirmed. 
 
 Keefer v. McKay (29 Gr. 1G2). 
 
 Kit- ly v. Kiely (2r> Gr. 40;$). 
 Killwum v. Arnold (27 Gr. 42it). 
 Kirkpatrick v. Lyster (13 Gr. 323). 
 Lavin v. Lavin (27 Gr. .%7). 
 
 9A.R. 117 ; re v. by Sup. Judgment affirmed l>y 
 Ct. 13 S. C. R. ")1."> equal division, and iv- 
 HuhnoM. Merchants' versed on further uj)- 
 
 Hank v. Keefer. 
 3 A. R. 4;«. 
 
 f) A. R. 1:"S. 
 
 1(5 Gr. 17. 
 
 7 A. R. l'.»7. 
 
 l>eal. 
 .Tud(pnent reversetl. 
 
 .Tudgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment attimie<l. 
 
 .Tudgment affirmcnl. 
 
 Lindsay Petroleum C<>. v. Hurd (IG Gr. 17(ir. 11'); rev. by Pr. .Judgment reversed 
 
 147). I < 'oun. L. R. 5 V. C. 
 
 ' L'-Jl. 
 Livingstone v. Western As.-'ur. Co. (14 Ki (iv. 9. 
 
 (ir. 4(51). I 
 
 Living.ston v. Wofxl (27 Gr. 515). jl7 C. L. J. 1(5«. 
 
 i 
 
 Lowson v. Canada Farmers' Ins. Co. (28 G A. R. 512. 
 (ir. yiii). 
 
 Macdonell v. McKay (15 Gr. 391). 
 Martin v. Martin (12 Gr. 500). 
 Mason & Scott in re (21 Gr. 629). 
 
 18 Gr. 98. 
 15 (ir. 58ti. 
 
 22 Gr. :m. 
 
 Moffatt V. lioard of Educalionof Carleton 5 A. R. 197. 
 
 Place (2(i (;r. .590). 1 
 
 Mossop V. Ma.-Hjn (17 Gr. 360). 18 Gr. 453. 
 
 Mulholland v. Willianiwjn (12 Gr. 91). 
 
 Munro v. Smart (2»j Gr. 310). 
 
 Murray, in re. Purdom v. Murray (29 Gr. 
 
 443). 
 McDonald v. Forrestal (21> Gr. 300). 
 
 McDonald v. Geoi^ian Bay Lumber Co, 
 
 (24 Gr. 3.^5). 
 McDonald v. ilcDonald (14 Gr. 545). 
 
 McGregor v. Rapelje (17 Gr. 38). 
 
 McKenzie v. Yielding (11 Gr. 406). 
 
 MePherson v. McKay (26 Gr. 141). 
 
 Nelles V. Bank of Montreal (28 Gr. 449). \ 
 
 14 Gr. 291. 
 4 A. R. 449. 
 9 A. R. 3G9. 
 
 part, but restored t)n 
 further appeal, 
 i Judgment reversed. 
 
 ! Judgment artinned. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment attirnied. 
 Judgment rsversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment atfinr.ed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 White V. Nelles (29 Gr. 338). 
 
 Newton v. Ontario Bank (13 Gr. 652). 
 Norris v. Meadows (28 Gr. 334). 
 Pardee v. Lloyd (26 Gr. 374). 
 
 I Parke v. Riley (12 Gr. 69). 
 M.D.— 2 
 
 None ; aflF. by Sup. Ct. I Judgment affirmed. 
 
 9 S. C. R. 12. I 
 
 2 A. R. .% ; aff. by Sup. .Tudgment reversed. 
 
 Ct. 2 S. C. R. 3G4. j 
 16 Gr. 37. .Tudgment rever.sed. 
 
 18 Gr. 4t(i. iJudgment affirmed. 
 
 13 Gr. 2.59. Judgment affinned. 
 
 !4 A. R. 501. Judgment affinned. 
 
 7 A. R. 743. .Tudgment affinned. 
 
 None ; judg'ton ai^teal .r\i'lj,'!>i<'nt atfirmed. 
 
 aff. by Sup. Ct. 11 S. 
 
 C. R. .587. 
 15 Gr. 283. [Judgment affirmed. 
 
 7 A. R. 237. 
 
 IJudgment affinned. 
 
 5 A. R. 1 ; aff. by Sup. '.Tudgment reversed. 
 
 Ct. subnom, BickfordI 
 
 v.Lloyd, S.C.Dig.35i 
 3 E. & A. 215. {Judgment affirmed. 
 
 ■;'8 
 
18 
 
 CtMx in the Court of Chancer ij 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Rei'okt on Appeal. ! Kksllt or Appeal. 
 
 Parkhurst v. Koy (1:7 dr. :«*!). 
 
 Paul V, Blackwwxl (3 Gr. 3!)4). 
 
 Peck V. Powein ('X Or. &22). 
 Powell V. Peck / 
 
 Pierce v. Canavan (28 (ir. 3j<j). 
 
 Rastall V. Atty.-Gen. (17 Gr. 1)' 
 
 Read v. Smith (14 Gr. •J.'W). 
 
 Reid V. Whitehead (10 Gr. 44G). 
 
 Rieker v. Ricker (27 Gr. 570). 
 
 Sanderson v. Burdett (Ki Gr. 119). 
 
 Saykir v. Cooper (18 C. L. J. 2G2). 
 
 Silverthorn v. Hunter (2(1 Gr. 3!)0). 
 
 Sinclair v. Dewar (17 Gr. <i21). 
 
 Smiles v. Rjlforfl (23 (Jr. 5U0). 
 
 Smith V. Merchants' Bank (2S Gr. 629). 
 
 Smith V. Ratte (i;i Gr. 0%). 
 
 Stammers v. 0'Donoh<K. (28 Gr. 207). 
 
 Standly v. Perry {-Hi Gr. 507). 
 
 Staimton v. Western Assur. Co. (21 Gr. 
 
 578). 
 Stephens v. Simpson (12 Gr. 4iJ3). 
 
 St. John V. Rykert (2«i Gr. 249). 
 
 Taylor v. Taylor (23 Gr. 49(5). 
 
 Thomson v. Torrance (28 Gr. 2.53). 
 Totten V. Douglas (16 Gr. 213). 
 
 7 A. R. 614. 
 4 Gr. 550, 
 
 jJudgimnt affirnicd. 
 '.Tndgment reverM'd, 
 
 8 A. R. 498 ; rev. by .ludgnient reversed, but 
 I Sup. Ct. in Peck v. ! restored in Peck v. 
 Powell, 11 S. C. R.| Powell on further ap- 
 
 1 494, 
 7 A, R, 187, 
 I 
 
 18 (4r. 138. 
 
 16 Gr, 52. 
 
 2 E, & A. 580. 
 
 7 A, R, 282, 
 
 18 Gr, 417. 
 
 19 C, L, J, 318, 
 5 A, R, 157. 
 
 19 Gr. 59. 
 1 A. R. 436. 
 
 8 A. R. 1.5. 
 15 Gr. 473. 
 
 l)eal, 
 j.Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 .Tudgment affirmed. 
 
 ■ludgment reversed. 
 
 iJudgment reversed. 
 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 8 A,R. 161 ; aff, by Sup, Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Ct, 11 S, C, R, 358, ; 
 2 A. R, 195; aff. by Sup, .fudgment reversed. 
 
 Ct, 3 S. C, R. 356, 
 23 (ir. 81. ,. fudgment affirmed. 
 
 15 (Jr. 594. 
 
 'Judgment affirmed. 
 
 4 A, R, 213 ; aff, by Sup, iJudgment reversed. 
 
 Ct, 10 S, C, R, 278. I 
 1 A, R, 245,rev, bySup, .ludgment affirmed, but 
 
 Ct. 2 S, C, R, 616 mull reversed on further i.p- 
 
 nom. Taylor v. Wall- 
 bridge, 
 9 A. R. 1. 
 
 18 Gr. 341, 
 
 Victoria Mutual Ins. Co. v. Bethune (23 1 A, R. 398, 
 Gr, 5(58). 
 
 Walker v. Provincial Ins. Co. (7 Gr. 137). 8 Gr. 217. 
 
 Walker v. Walton (24 Gr. 209). 1 A. R. 579. 
 
 Wallace, Township of, v. CJeat Western 3 A. R. 44. 
 
 Ry. Co. (25 Gr, 8(i). 
 Washburn v. Ferris (14 Gr. 516). 16 Gr. 76. 
 
 Watson V. Lindsay (27 Gr. 2^). J6 A. R. 609. 
 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
Ari'EAt. 
 
 niH'd. 
 
 'erse<l. 
 
 versed, Imt 
 1 r.'ck V. 
 fuither ap- 
 
 irnied. 
 
 I'ert-ed. 
 
 imied. 
 
 verstd. 
 
 versed. 
 
 firmed. 
 
 firmed. 
 
 firmed. 
 
 iversed. 
 
 finned. 
 
 iversed. 
 
 tinned. 
 
 [firmed. 
 
 jversed. 
 
 IHniied. 
 
 ffinned. 
 
 e versed. 
 
 vtfirmed, Imt 
 m further i.p- 
 
 tlirmed. 
 eversetl. 
 kttirmed. 
 
 kffirmed. 
 •eversed. 
 iffirmed. 
 affirmed, 
 [iflirmed. 
 
 Carried to the Cmirt of Appeal. 
 
 19 
 
 C.\SK. 
 
 Rkport on Appeal. 
 
 Watson V. Mason (22 Gr. 180). 
 
 Watson V. Munro (6 Gr. 385) 5 Gr. 662. 
 
 Weir V. Mathieson (11 Gr. 383). 
 
 Western Assur. Co. v. Provincial Ins. Co. 
 
 (26 Gr. 561). 
 Whitby, Town of, v. Liscombe (22 Gr. 
 
 Whitehead v. BuflFalo & Lake Huron Rv. 
 
 . Co. (7 Gr. a51). ^ 
 
 Wilson V. Beatty. In re Donovan (29 Gr. 
 
 280). 
 Workman v. Robb (28 Gr. 243). I 
 
 Worswick V. Canada Fire ft Marine Ins. 
 
 Co. (25 Gr. 282). 
 AVriifht V, Morgan (24 Gr. 457). 
 
 Wright V. Synod of Huron (29 Gr. 348). 
 
 Wyld V. Liverpool, London & Globe Ins. 
 Co. (21 Gr. 458). 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 22 Gr. 574. 
 
 8 Gr. <}0. 
 
 ;3 E. & A. 123. 
 
 '5 A. R. 190. 
 
 i 
 
 123 Gr. 1. 
 
 8 Gr, 157. 
 
 9 A. R 149. 
 7 A. R. 389. 
 3 A. R. 487. 
 1 A. R. 613. 
 
 9A.R.411;afF. bySup. 
 
 Ct. 11S.C.R.95. 
 23Gr.442; aff. bySup. 
 
 Ct. 1 S. C. R. 604. 
 
 ^** 495")' ^'^**' Western Ry. Co. (24 Gr. 2 A. R. 226. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment aflSrmed. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 i I 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 tl 
 
[20] 
 
 CASES IN THE COUET OF QUEEN'S BENCH FOK 
 
 ONTARIO CARRIED TO THE COURT 
 
 OF APPEAL. 
 
 Case. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Re-svlt of Appeal. 
 
 Agricultural luvestincnt Co. v. Federal 
 
 Bank (45 q. B; 214). 
 Alexander v. Toronto & NipissingRy. Co. 
 
 (33 Q. B. 474). 
 Allan V. McTavish (41 Q. B. 507). 
 
 C A. R. 192. 
 3;5 Q. B. 453. 
 2 A. R. 278. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 Judgment affimiKl . 
 Judgment revenied. 
 
 Backus V. Smith (44 Q. B. 428). 
 
 5 A. R. 341. 
 
 Judgement reversed. 
 
 Ball V. Parker (39 Q. B. 488). 
 
 1 A. R. 503. 
 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Ballagh v. Royal Mutual Fire Ins. Co. 
 
 (44 (^ B. 70). 
 Bank of Toronto v. Nixon (43 Q. B. 447). 
 
 5 A. R. 87. 
 4 A. R. 34(3. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Barber v. Morton (45 Q. B. ;{80). 
 
 7 A. R. 114. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Barker v. Torrance (30 Q. B. 43). 
 
 31 Q. B. 501. 
 
 J udgment affirmed. 
 
 Barned's Banking Co. v. Reynolds (40 Q. 3 A. R. 371; rev. by Judgment reversed, but 
 
 Sup. Ct. S. C. Dig.: restored on further ap- 
 170. j)eal. 
 
 3 E. & A. 1, ! Judgment affirmed. 
 
 B. 435). 
 Bell V. McKindsey (23 Q. B. 102). 
 Boulton V. Smith (17 Q. B. 400). 
 
 1 18 Q. B. 458. 
 
 '.Judgment affirmed. 
 1 Judprment reversed. 
 
 Brooks & County of Haldiraand, in re (41 1 3 A. R. 73. 
 
 Q. B. 381). 
 Brown v. Great Western Ry. Co. (40 Q. 2 A. R. 04 ; aff. by Sup. Judgment affirmed 
 
 B. 333). i Ct. 3 S. C. R. i5U. 
 
 Burgess v. Bank of Montreal (42 Q. B. 212). 3 A. K. 00. 
 
 Burritt v. Hamilton (17 Q. B. 443). 1 18 Q. B. 401. 
 
 Cameron v. Todd (22 Q. B. 300). !2 E. & A. 434. 
 
 Clark V. Rose (20 Q. B. 108). |29 Q. B. 302. 
 
 C'lissold V. Machell (25 Q. B. 80). |26 Q. B. 422. 
 
 C'cnnnercial Bank v. Great Western Ry. 2 E. & A. 285; afF. by 
 
 ~ " - Pr. Coun. 3 Moo. N. 
 
 S. 205. 
 5 A. R. 458 ; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. S. C. R. 
 105. 
 5 A. R. .549. 
 
 Co. (22 il. B. 233). 
 Cosgrave v. Boyle (45 Q. B. 32). 
 
 ; 
 
 Cowling V. Dixon (45 Q. B. 94). 
 Crathern v. Bell (40 Q. B. 305). 
 Cro.is v. Currie (43 Q. B. 599). 
 
 8 A. R. 537. 
 5 A. R. 31. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 I Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 ])eal. 
 
 Judgment reversetl. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
Cases ni Court of Queen's Bench Carried to Court of Ajypenl, 21 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Result of Aiteai.. 
 
 Darling v. Hitchcock (25 q. B. 403). 
 
 Davies v. Home Ins, Co. (24 Q. B. 3G4). 
 
 Denison v. Leslie (43 Q. B. 22). 
 
 Denny v. Montreal Telegraph Co. (42 Q. 
 
 B. .577). 
 Doed. Henderson v. Westover (9Q. B. 47). 
 
 28 Q. B. 43J). 
 3 E. & A. 2C9. 
 3 A. R. 536. 
 3 A. R. 628. 
 1 E. & A. 465. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Jvulgment reverh<e>l. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment varied. 
 Judgment affinned . 
 
 Erb V. Great Western R y. Co. (42 Q. B, 90). 3 A. R. 446 ; aff . by Sup. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Ct. 5 S. C. R. 179. j 
 
 Ferguson V. Fergu.son (:'!• Q. B. 232). 1 A. R. 452; rev. by Judgment reversed, but 
 
 i JSu]). Ct. 2 8. C. R. restoretl on furtlu r ap- 
 ' 497. I peal. 
 
 Frev V. V*'ellington Mutual Ins. Co. (43 4 A. R. 29.'?, rev. by Judgment affirmed, but 
 'q. B. 102). Sup. Ct. 5 S. C. R. 82. ' reversed on further a|>- 
 
 ! i)eal. 
 Fryer v. Shielil (45 Q. B. 188). |6 A. R. 57. jJudgment reversed. 
 
 
 Gamble v. Great Western Ry. Co. (24 Q.'3 E. k A. 1G3 
 
 B. 407). I 
 
 Canton v. Size (22 Q. B. 473). |2 E. & A. 368. 
 
 Gauthier v, Waterloo Ins. Co. (44 Q. B.'c A. R. 231. 
 
 490). I 
 
 Gillson v. North Grey Ry. Co. (33 Q. B. 38 q. B. 475. 
 
 12S). I 
 
 GoHsage v. Canada Land & Emigration Co. 2 L. J. (N.S.)90. 
 
 (24 Q. B. 452). '■ 
 
 Grand Junction Ry. Co. v. County ot G A. R. 339; aflF. 
 
 Feterboro" (45 (i. B- 302). ' ' 
 
 Hall v. Hill (22 Q. B. 578). 
 Hammond v. McLay (26 Q. B. 434). 
 Harrison v. Pinkney (44 Q. B. 509). 
 Henderson v. Fortune (18 Q. B. 520). 
 
 Sup. Ct. S S. C. R. 
 2 E. k A. 569. 
 28 Q. B. 463. 
 6 A. R. 225. 
 6 U. C. L. J. 197. 
 
 Hendricksou v. t^'ieen Ins. Co. (30 Q. B. 31 Q. B. 547. 
 
 108). ! 
 
 High School B.mrd, in ■- (45 Q. B. iOO). 8 A. R. 169. 
 
 Hood V. Toronto Harbour Commissioners 37 Q. B. 72. 
 
 (34 q. B. ,S7i. 
 Horseman v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (30 q 31 q. B. 535. 
 
 B. 130). i 
 
 Hurd V. Lewis (19 Q. B. 41). 6 U. C. L. J. 197. 
 
 'Judgment 
 
 jJudgment 
 
 [Judgment 
 
 'judgment 
 
 Judgment 
 
 by Judgment 
 76. i 
 
 iJudgment 
 
 Judgment 
 
 I 
 
 Judgment 
 
 .Tudgment 
 
 Judgment 
 
 iJudgment 
 
 IJudgment 
 
 Judgment 
 
 •Tudgment 
 
 Ingram v. Taylor (46 Q. B. 52). 
 Jones V. Cowden (34 Q. B. 345). 
 
 7 A. R. 210. 
 
 I 
 
 136 Q. B. 395. 
 
 affirmed, 
 affirmed, 
 affirmed . 
 affirmed, 
 affirmed, 
 reversed. 
 
 affirmed, 
 reversed, 
 affirmed, 
 reversed, 
 affinned. 
 reversed, 
 affirmed, 
 affirmed, 
 affirmed. 
 
 Kings, Municipality of, v. Hughes (17 Q. " U. C. L. J. 43. 
 B. 253). ' i 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmetl. 
 Judgment affirmefl. 
 
22 
 
 Cases in the Court of Queen's Bench for Ontario 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Leprohon v. City of Ottawa (40 Q. B. 478). 
 Lucas V, Township of Moore (43 Q. B. 334). 
 
 Macdonnell v. MacDonald (19 Q. B. 130). 
 
 Madden v. Cox (44 Q. B. 542). 
 
 Mann v. Western Assur. Co. (19 Q. B.314). 
 
 Marrin v. Stadacona Ins. Co. (43 Q. B. 
 
 55G). 
 Martin v. Crow (22 Q. B. 485). 
 
 Mechanics' Building & Saving Soc. v. 
 
 Gore District Mutual Ins. Co. (40 Q. 
 
 B. 220). 
 Milloy V. Kerr (43 Q. B. 78). 
 
 Mink V. Jarvis (8 Q. B. 397). 
 
 Mitchell V. Goodall (44 Q. B. 398). 
 
 Moffatt V. Robertson (19 Q. B. 401). 
 
 MolHon's Bank v. McDonald (40 Q. B. 529). 
 
 Moore V. Connecticut Mutual Ins. Co. (41 
 Q. B. 497). 
 
 Mc Arthur v. Egleson (43 Q. B. 406). 
 
 McCallum v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (30 Q. 
 
 B. 122). 
 McCollum V. Wilson (17 Q. B. 572). 
 
 McEwan v. McLeod (46 Q. B. 235). 
 
 MiHardy v. Township of Ellice (37 Q. B. 
 
 580). 
 Mclntyre v. McCracken (37 Q. B. 422). 
 
 Mclntyre v. National Ins. Co. of Montreal 
 
 (44 Q. B. 501). 
 McLean v. Dunn (39 Q. B. 551). 
 
 McMaster v. King (42 Q. B. 409). 
 
 Ner V, >^u^uai Life Ins. Co. (45 
 
 r , .;.i^■ .. Bitth ..i).>l Board, m re (39 Q, 
 
 ):■. rf:') a/ g,. r;. 529. 
 
 Nickie '. T A •': . Q. B. 126). 
 Norton v. Smith (20 Q. B. 213). 
 
 O'Connor v. Dunn (39 Q. B. 597). 
 Ontario Salt Co. v. Larkin (35 Q. B. 229), 
 
 2 A. R. 522. 
 
 3 A. R. 602. 
 
 2 E. & A. 341. 
 5 A. R. 473. 
 19 Q. B. 329. 
 
 4 A. R. 330. 
 
 2 E. & A. 425. 
 
 3 A. R. 151. 
 
 Rkpobt on Appeal. 
 
 Rksilt ok Appeal. 
 
 Judgmi-nt reversal. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reverw-d. 
 
 Judgment aftinned 
 
 by equal divinion. 
 
 .Judgment attinned. 
 
 Judgment affinne<l. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment revereed. 
 
 3 A. R. 350 ; aff. by Sup. .Tudgment affirme<l. 
 Ct. 8 S. C. R. 474. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 by equal division. 
 
 13 Q. B. 84 
 5 A. R. 164. 
 
 1 E. & A. 459. 
 
 2 A. R. 102. 
 
 3 A. R. 230; rev. by Sup. 
 Ct.eS.C.R. 634;and 
 by Pr. Coun. G App. 
 Cfas. 644. 
 
 3 A. R. 577. 
 
 31 Q. B. 527. 
 
 18 Q. B. 445. 
 
 9 A. R. 239. 
 
 1 A. R. C28. 
 
 1 A. R. 1 ; rev. by Sup. 
 Ct. 1 S. C. R. 479. 
 
 5 A. R. 580. 
 
 1 A. R. 153. 
 
 3 A. R. 100. 
 
 7 A. R. 171. 
 
 1 A. R. 288. 
 37 Q. B. 51. 
 
 7 U. C.L. J. 263. 
 
 2 A. R. 247. 
 36 Q. B. 486. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affimitd. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, Imt 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 •Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 jJudgment reversetl. 
 
 Judgment attimiwl. 
 
 Judgment reverse<l. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further aji- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
Ciirripd to the Court of Ajypf'ol. 
 
 23 
 
 ■ i 
 
 Case. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Result of Appeal. 
 
 Parsons v. Citizens' Ins. Co. (43 Q. B. 261. \ 
 Parsons v. Queen Ins. Co. (48 Q. B. 271. J 
 
 Parsons v. Standard Ins. Co. (iliq. B. 003). 
 
 Paterson v. Tliompson (4(5 Q. B. 7). 
 
 Queen, The, v. Frawley (4G Q. B. l.'»3). 
 Queen, The, v. Ho<!ge (46 t^. B. 141). 
 
 Reg. V. Boucher (8 P. R. 20). 
 
 Rconey v. Lyon (40 Q. B. 366). 
 
 Royal Canadian Bank v. Carrutliers (28 Q. 
 
 B. 578). 
 Royal Canadian Bank v. Miller (28 Q. B. 
 
 5i)3). 
 
 Scragg V. City of London (26 Q. B. 263). 
 
 Sexton V. Paxtoji (21 Q. B. 389). 
 
 Shannon v. (iore District mutual Ins. Co. 
 
 (40 Q. B. 188). 
 Shaw V. De Salaberry Xav. Co. (18 Q. B. 
 
 r>4i). 
 
 Sherboneau v. Beaver Mutual Ins. Co. 
 
 (30 Q. B. 472). 
 Smith V. Moffatt (27 Q. B. 195). 
 
 Sowden v. Standard Fire Ins. Co. (44 Q. 
 
 B. 95). 
 Sterling v. McEwan (17 Q. B. 361). 
 
 Superior & Savings Co. v. Lucas (44 Q. B. 
 106). 
 
 Tench v. Great Western Ry. Co. (32 Q. B. 
 
 452). 
 Toms V. Township of Whitby (35 Q. B. 
 
 195). 
 Toronto Street Ry. Co. v. Fleming (35 Q. 
 
 B. 264). 
 Trust & Loan Co. v. Lawrason (45 Q. B. 
 
 176). 
 Trust & Loan Co. v. Covert (32 Q. B. 222). 
 
 Tylee v. Hinton (42 Q. B. 228). 
 
 Ulrich V. National Ins. Co. (42 Q. B. 141). 
 
 Van Velsor v. Hughson (45 Q. B. 252). 
 
 4 A. R. 9(5 1 aff. by Sun. Judgment 
 4 A. R. 103/ Ct. 4 S. C. I reversed 
 
 R, 215, Ijut reversed j iieal. 
 
 by Pr. Coun. 7App. , 
 
 Caa. JH», except as toi 
 
 validity of Ont. Ins.j 
 
 Act. I 
 
 4 A. R^326; rey^. by Sup.;.Tudgment 
 
 restored 
 I teal. 
 
 Ct. 5 S. C. R. 233, 
 9 A.R. .-.26 
 
 aftirmod, b\it 
 on further ai)- 
 
 reversed, but 
 on further a]i- 
 
 7 A. R. 246. 
 
 Judgment reversed 
 Judgiuent 
 
 7 A. R. 216 ; aff. by Pr. 'Judgment 
 Cuun. '.I Ai>i). Cas. 117! 
 
 4 A. R. 191 xiif) Horn, /nj Judgment 
 
 re Boucher. 
 2 A. R. 53. 
 
 •li) Q. B. 283. 
 29 Q. B. 260. 
 
 28 Q. B. 457. 
 2 E. & A. 219. 
 2 A. R. :'.96. 
 6 I'. C. L. J 197. 
 33 Q. B. 1. 
 28 Q. B. 486. 
 5 A. R. 2<t0. 
 18 Q. B. 466. 
 15 A. R. 748. 
 
 33 Q. B. 8. 
 37 Q. B. lOf). 
 37 Q. B. 116. 
 
 Judgment 
 Judgment 
 Judgment 
 
 reversed, 
 reversed. 
 
 affirmed, 
 affirmed, 
 affirmed, 
 affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 6 A. R. 286; aff. bySup. Judgment reverse<l. 
 
 Ct. 10 S. C. R. 679. I 
 1 A. R. 26 ; rev. by Sup.' Judgment reversed, but 
 
 Ct. 1 S. C. R. 564. suhl restored on further ap- 
 
 iiom. T. & L. Co. V. peal. 
 
 Ruttan. 
 
 3 A. R. 53. 
 
 4 A. R. 84. 
 9 A. R. 390. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 'fl 
 
 m 
 
24 Cases in Court of Queen's Bench Carried to Court of Appeal 
 
 Case. 
 
 Rkport on ApI'KAL. 
 
 Wallace v. Swift (23 Q. B. 503). jsi Q. B. 523. 
 
 Warriner v. Kingsinill (8 Q. B, 407). 13 Q. B. 18. 
 
 Welland, County of, v. Buffalo & Lake 31 Q. B. 53!) 
 
 Huron Ry. Co. (30 Q. B. 147). 
 Whelan v. The C^ueen (2>S i.1 B. 2). 
 
 28 Q. B. 108. 
 27 Q. B. 425. 
 2 A. R. 8. 
 18 Q. B. 470. 
 
 Widder v. BufFalo & Lake Huron Ry. Co. 
 
 (24 Q. B. 520). 
 WildH V. Smith (41 Q. B. 130). 
 
 Wilson V. Kerr (17 Q. B. 168). 
 
 Wisconsin Bank v. Bank of Britixh North 2 E. & A. 282. 
 America (21 Q. B. 284). j 
 
 Yeomans v. County of Wellington (43 Q. 4 A. R. 301. 
 B. 522). 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 Judgment reverstd. 
 
 Judgment affiruKil. 
 
 Judgment aftirmtd. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 
 on Error. 
 Judgment attirmfci. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
[25] 
 
 CASES IN THE ONTAKIO COUllT OF COMMON 
 
 PLEAS CARRIED TO THE COURT 
 
 OF APPEAL. 
 
 ^ 
 
 Case. 
 
 Report on Appeal. Result ok Appeal. 
 
 Anchor Ins. Co. v. PIkl'iu.x Ins. Co. {30C.'<» A. R. 'A>7. 
 
 P. 570). i 
 
 Austin V. Dick.son (11 C. P. 5!)4), 2 E. & A. 373. 
 
 Bank of Toronto v. l-x'cles (10 C. P. 282). ;2 E. & A. .'.3. 
 
 Banque Nationale v. Sparks (27 C. P. 320). '2 A. R. 112, 
 
 i 
 Barrio, Township of, v. (Jillies (20 C. P. 21 C. P. 213. 
 
 31)!)). ! 
 
 Berlin, Municipality of, v. Grange (i) C. 1 E. & A. 27'.). 
 
 P. 211). 
 Birkett v. McGuire (31 C. P. 430), 
 
 7 A.R. 53; rev. by Sup. 
 Ct. S. C. Dig, 508, 
 
 3 A, R, 107, 
 
 8 A, R. 233, 
 6 U. C. L. .1. 182. 
 
 Jutlgiiicnt attiriufd. 
 Judgment attinued. 
 Judgment aftirnied. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 .Judgment affirmed, 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed, 
 but restored on 
 further appeal. 
 
 Judgment rever.«ied. 
 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Boice V. O'Loane (28 C. P. 50(5), 
 
 Boswell V. Sutherland (32 C. P. 131), 
 
 Boys V, Smith (!> C, P. 27). 
 
 Braid v. Great Western Ry. Co. (10 C. P.i7 U. C. L. J, 43 ; aff. by Judgment affirmed. 
 137). I Pr. Comi. 1 Moo. M, 
 
 I S. 101. 
 Bullen V. Moodie (13 C. P, 12(5). \2 E. k A. 370 suh nom 
 
 i Pcmton V. Bullen. 
 Burnham v. Waddell (28 C. P. 203). 3 A. R. 288 
 
 Camercm v. Wait (27 C. P. 475). 
 
 Cami)be11 v. Great Western Ry. Co. (20 C. 
 
 P. 345). 
 Campbell v. Hill (22 C. P. 52(5). 
 
 Carlisle v, Tait (32 C. P. 43). ^ 
 
 Church v. Eenton (28 C. P. 384). 
 
 Cockburn v. Sylvester (27 C; P. 34). 
 
 Coffey V. Quebec Bank (-^0 C. P, 110), 
 
 Coleman v, McDerniott (5 C, P, 303), 
 
 Commercial Bank of Canada v. Cotton (17 
 
 C, P, 214), 
 Contois V. Bonfield (25 C. P. 39). 
 
 Cruioksliank and Corby in re (30 C, P, 
 4G6), 
 
 3A. R. 175; aff. by Sup. 
 
 Ct. S. C. Dig, 332, 
 20 C, P, 5(53, 
 
 23 C, P, 473. 
 
 7 A. R. 10. 
 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment atKrnied. 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 'Judgment affirmed. 
 'Judgment reversed. 
 
 4 A. R. 159 ; aff. by Sup. .Judgment affirmed 
 
 Ct. 5 S. C. R. 23t). 
 1 A. R. 471. 
 
 20 C. P. 555. 
 1 E, & A. 445. 
 17 C. P. 447, 
 27 C, P, 84, 
 5 A, R, 415. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affinned 
 on equal division. 
 
hi 
 
 S6 
 
 Cases in the Ontario Court of Ci/nimon Pleas 
 
 Cahk. 
 
 % 
 
 I 
 
 Rei'ort on Ai'I'bal. 
 
 Doniuark v. McConaKliy (2'J C. P. 503). 
 
 Donly V. Holiiiwood (30 C. P. 240). 
 Doyle V. Bell (32 C. P. G32). 
 Fisher v. JamU'son (12 C. P. fiOl). 
 
 None. Ji)cl)7nient(map- 
 l)eal aff. by Sup. Ct. 
 4 S. C. R. (501). 
 
 4 A. R. 555. 
 
 11 A. R. 32«K 
 2 E. & A. 242. 
 
 FitzRerald v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (28 C. 4 A. R. 601; aff. by Sup, 
 
 P. 580). 
 Forsyth v. Gait (21 C. P. 408). 
 
 Fowler V. Vail (27 C. P. 417). 
 
 Ct. 5 S. C. R. 204. 
 22 C. P. 115. 
 
 4 A. R. 207. 
 
 » A. R. 211. 
 
 Fulton V. Ujiper Canada Furniture Co, 
 
 (32 C. P. 422). 
 Gauhan v. St. Lawrance and Ottawa Ry. i3 A. R. 3!)2, 
 
 Co. (29 C. P. 102). 
 Gildernleeve v. ]McDougall (31 C. P. 164). 
 
 Gotwalls V. Mulholland (ir. C. P. 62). 
 CJraliani v. Smith (27 C. P. 1). 
 
 6 A. R. i)53. 
 3 E. & A. 1!)4. 
 
 Result ok Aim-kai,. 
 
 Wiley V. Smith, 1 A. R. 
 170; atf. bv Sup. Ct. 
 ! 2 S. C.H.I. 
 Grant & Great Western Ry. Co. (7 C. P. 5 U. C. L. .1. 210. 
 
 4;{8). ■ ! 
 
 Haldan v. Kerr (12 C. P. (120). |2 K. & A. SiS2. 
 
 !8 A. R. 135. 
 
 I 
 
 12 E. & A. 2;!0. 
 
 Hall, in re (32 C. P. 4!)8). 
 
 Hamilton v. Holcomb (12 C. P. 38). 
 
 Hamilton v. Myles (23 C. P. 203). J24 C. P. 300. 
 
 Harold v. County of Simcoe (16 C, P. 43). IS C. P. 1. 
 
 Hedstrom v. Toronto Car Wheel Co. (31 8 A. R. 627. 
 
 C. P. 475). 
 HoiK) V. White (17 C. Y. 430). 
 
 Howell V. Alport (12 C. P. 375). 
 
 lanaon v. Paxton (22 C. P. 505). 
 Irwin V. C^ity of Bradford (22 C. P. 18). 
 Lawrence v. Ketchum (28 C. P. 406). 
 
 Mason v. Ajfricultural Assur. Assoc, of 
 
 Canada (16 C. P. 403). 
 Mason (Assignee) v. Hamilton (22 C. P. 
 
 190). 
 May V. Standard Ins. Co. (30 C. P. 51). 1 5 ^. R. 605, 
 
 19 C. P. 479. 
 
 Wiley V. Smith, 1 A. R. 
 
 179; aff. by Sup. Ct. 
 
 2 S. C. R. 1. 
 23 C. P. 439. 
 
 22 C. P. 421. 
 
 4 A. R. 92. 
 
 18 C. P. 19. 
 
 22 C. P. 411. 
 
 Merchant's Bonk v. Bostwick (28 C. P.,3A. R. 24 
 
 450). 
 Miller v. Reid (20 C. P. 576). 
 
 Mills V. Kerr (32 C. P. 68). 
 
 4 A. R. 479. 
 7 A. R. 769. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 •ludgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment revers»;d. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 I Decision overruled.. 
 
 ! 
 
 .Fudgment aftinned. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed, 
 .ludgment reverseil. 
 Judgment afiinned. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Decision overruled. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed 
 
 in part. 
 Judginent reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
CaiTU'd to the Court of Aj^iu'dl. 
 
 27 
 
 Cahr. 
 
 IfKi'OKT ON Appeal. 
 
 Rkmilt of Appeal. 
 
 Milla V. King (14 C. P. 223). 
 
 !3 K. & A. 120. 
 
 MoArthur v. Town of Southwold (2J)C. P., 3 A. R. 2!tr), 
 
 216). 
 McCrae v. Waterloo County Ins. Co. (26 
 
 C. P. 431). 
 McCulloch V. Mclntee (13 C. P. 438). 
 
 McEd wards v. Palmer (28 C. P. 132). 
 McGuffin V. Ryall (13 C. P. 115). 
 
 1 A. R. 218. 
 
 2 E. & A. 3(K). 
 2 A. R. 43«. 
 
 2 E. & A. 41.' 
 
 McKenzie v. Kittridge (24 C, P. 1, 145). 27 (\ P. 65; aff. by Sup. 
 
 Ct. 4 H. C. R. 368. 
 
 McKindsey v. Stewart (20 C. P. 295). 
 
 McLachlin v. Dix(jn (4 C. P. 71). 
 
 McLaren v. Canada Central Ry. Co. (32 
 C. P. 324). 
 
 McMaster v. Garland (31 C. P. 320). 
 
 Mc(2ueen v. Plurnix Mutual Insurance 
 Co. (2'JC. P. 511). 
 
 Neill V. Travellers' Ins. Co. (31 C. P. 394). 
 
 Niagara Election, i:i re (29 C. P. 261 ). 
 Nicholls V. Cuniniing (25 C. P. 169). 
 
 Northern Ry. Co. v. Patton (15 C. P. 332). 
 
 Northwood v. Rennie (28 C. P. 202). 
 
 O'Connor v. Beatty (27 C. P. 203). 
 
 Oliver v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (28 C. P. 
 
 143). 
 Oliver v. Newhouse (32 C. P. 90). 
 
 Page v. Austin (30 C. P. 108). 
 
 Palmer v. McLennan (22 C. P. 258). 
 
 Peek V. Shields (31 C. P. 112). 
 
 Pettigrew v. Doyle (17 C. P. 34). 
 
 Pim V. Municiiml Council of Ontario 
 
 (9 C. P. 302). 
 Potter V. Carroll (9 C. P. 442). 
 
 Provincial Insurance Co. v. Cameron (31 
 C. P. 523). 
 
 Queen, The, v. Town of Paris (12 C. P. 
 
 445). 
 
 21 C. P. 226. 
 4 C. P. 307. 
 
 A|>i>eal qua*»lie(l. 
 Judgment reverned. 
 Judgment aftirnn-d. 
 Judgment re\ rsed. 
 Judgment revejKfd. 
 Judgment reveiswl. 
 
 Judgment affinned by 
 equal division and on 
 furtlur appeal. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 8 A. R. .564; aff. by Pr. j Judgment affirmed, by 
 
 equal division and on 
 furtlier appeal. 
 
 Coun.3Can.Gaz. 346, 
 8 A. R. 1 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 4 A. R. 289; rev. by Sup. Judgment reversed, but 
 Ct. 4 S. C. R. 660. restored on further ap- 
 
 )>eal. 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 equal division and on 
 further appeal. 
 Appeal quashed. 
 
 7A. R.570;aff. bySup. 
 Ct. 12 S. C. R. 55. 
 
 4 A. R. 407. 
 
 26 C. P. 323; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. 1 S. C. R. 
 395. 
 
 2 L. J. N. S. 90. 
 
 3 A. R. 37. 
 
 2 A. R. 497. 
 
 Erb V. Grand Trunk 
 Ry. Co. 3 A. R. 446. 
 8 A. R. 122. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further aii- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affirme<l. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Decision affinned by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 7 A. R. 1; aff. by Sup. .Tudgment reversed. 
 
 Ct. 10 S. C. R.' 132. j 
 22 C. P. 565. 1 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 6 A. R. 639 ; aflf. by Sup. ! Judgment affinned. 
 
 Ct. 8 S. C. R. 579. 
 17 C. P. 459. 
 
 9 C. P. 304. 
 1 E. & A. 341. 
 
 9 A. R. 56 »ub nom. 
 
 Provincial Ins. Co. v. 
 
 Worts. 
 9 U. C. L. J. 231. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 equal division. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
H 
 
 28 Canfifi in Court of Common Plfnn Carried to Court (tf Appeal . 
 
 ■■ 
 
 Cahk. 
 
 tiniiil.m V. Uniun Kin- Iiik. Co. (31 C. V. 8 A. 11. 370, 
 
 K.%'. V. iiishop (if Iliir(-ii (8 C. P. in:\). 
 
 Kki'oiit (»n Ai'i'KAr,. 
 
 R«'f^. V. lir(.wno(:nC. 1'. JH!), 
 
 R«'K. V. limit (1(;C. P. 1 ».-.). 
 
 ll<'tr. V. Liiw S(K:it'ty (2(» C. P. AWO). 
 
 Mouiitjoy V. \\v\i. 1 K. 
 A. J{. ;iH(i, 
 17 C. P. 44;{. 
 21 '). P. 221t. 
 
 RobinH V. Victoriii IMutiml Fire Iuh. Co.'O A. If. 4L'7. 
 
 Co. (:n f. P. nti-j). 
 
 Rnuney v. Kooiify (U'.l C. P. 347). 4 A. K. 255. 
 
 Hkhji.t ok Ai'I'K.m.. 
 
 Judgment reverwil. 
 DitciHion utririiit'd. 
 Jmlgmcnt attirnu-d. 
 Jiulgnit'nt attiniu'il. 
 •Tudgini'nt affirincd. 
 Judgment aftirnied. 
 JudgiiU'iit atHrnicd. 
 JudptiH'iit iitKrinrd. 
 •rudgmcnt n'Vfiscd, 
 Tudginent aftimu'd. 
 
 R».scnl).'ivi'r V. (Inmd Trunk l{y. Co. (32 8 A. 1{. ISJ; iiff.l.vSnp. 
 
 C. \\M\)). I Ct. !t .S. C. 11. 311. 
 
 Royid (Janiidian Bank v. Kflly (20C. P.I22C. P. 27'.>. 
 
 ni'.t). I 
 
 RnHK.ll V. Cana<la Life As.siir. Co. (32C.!8 A. R. 710. 
 
 P. •.'.••(;). I j 
 
 Ryan V. liyan (2!) C i*. 44!i). 4 A.K..%3;n'v.liySuii.|.TudKni«'nt revprsed, 
 
 I Ct. 5 S. C. 11. 3M7. r»'Htortd on fnrtlnr 
 
 Sanii-i V. Inland (28 C. P. 478). i4 A. R. 118. .IiidKnicnt iilfinnt.(J. 
 
 S.ujii V. (Joro District Mntual Ina. Co. 1 A. R. 545; rev. by. Sujj. Judgment rcverst^d, 
 (2r> C. P. 405). Ct. 2S. C. R. 411. ' restored on further 
 
 .Sliannun v. Hastingn Mutual Ins. Co. (2G'2 A. R. 81 ; atf. by .S,:;/. .ludgment attirnied. 
 V. P. 3S(I). 1 Ct. 2 S. C. R. 31)4. 
 
 .Siieriif V. Holuonibo (13 C. P. 5ft0). 2 E. & A. 51(5. 
 
 Ir.it 
 ai>>i. 
 
 but 
 
 HI". 
 
 Silsby s. Village of Dunnville (31 C. P. '8 A. R. 524. 
 
 'W ). i 
 
 Stiilford, Townsbip of, v. Bell (31 C. P. (> A. R. 273. 
 
 77). I 
 
 Htavner v. Applegartli (8 C. P. 133). 5 U. C. L. J. 210. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 St. Catliarines, Town of, v. Gardner (20 21 C. P. T.'O xith »o(/;. .ludguient affirmed. 
 C. P. 107). I .St. Catliarines, eto.,! 
 
 1 Road Co. V. Gardn<'r. 
 Street v. Comity of .Siuu,... (12 C. P. 284). '2 E. k. A. 211. [.fudpiiient affirmed. 
 
 Sujiple V. (Jilinoiir (5 C. P. 31.^). 
 
 Sweenev v. President, etc;., of Port Bur- 1!) C. P. 37G. 
 
 well Il!irbour(17C. P. .")74). 
 Thome V. Torrance (l(i C. P. 445). 18 C. P. 2!». 
 
 Todd v. London, Liverpool & Globe Ins.!20C. P. .")23. 
 
 Co. (18 C. P. 1!)2). j 
 
 Turley v. Benedict (31 C. P. 417). 7 A. R. .300. 
 
 Victoria Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson 9 A. R. (i20. 
 
 (32 C. P. 470). I 
 
 Walton v. County of York (30 C. P. 217). A. R. 181. 
 
 None. Judg't on appeal .rudgment affirmed. 
 I atf. by Pr. Coun. Ill 
 Moo. P. C. 551. 
 
 Williamson v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 
 
 (25 C. P. 453). 
 Wright V. Sun Mutual Life Ins. Co. (29 
 
 C. P. 221). 
 
 26 C. P. 501. 
 
 5A.R.218;aflf.bvSnp. 
 Ct. 5S.C. R.400,.s«6 
 nom. London Life 
 Assur. Co. V. Wright, 
 
 (Judgment reversed. 
 iJudgment affirmed. 
 iJudgment rever.sed. 
 'judgment rever.sed. 
 'judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
[29] 
 
 CASES IN THE HIGH COUKT OF JUSTICE 
 
 FOR (ONTARIO CARRIED TO THE 
 
 COURT OF AFRl^LVL. 
 
 Camk. 
 
 Rki'out on AiM'KAt. ! Hksli/i" ok Aitkai- 
 
 I 
 
 Abraliaiii v. Abraham (111 O. R. 2o«). 118 A. K. 430. 
 Adunw V. Wat«..ii Mfg. Co. (15 O. R. 218). !l(i A. R. 2. 
 
 Aitcheson v. Mann ('J P. R. 253). 
 
 9 r. li. 47;<. 
 1!) A. R. 440. 
 
 iiTudgini'iit aftirnu-d. 
 Judgnii ut uffinm>d. 
 Judgnii nt atiirnicd. 
 
 Alger V. Sarnia Oil C<i., in rr. (21 0. R 
 
 '.40). 
 AU.nby and Weir, in rt (13 P. R. 403). 14 P. R. 227 
 
 Allison V. McDonald (23 (). R. 288). 
 
 120 A. R. (;!)5. 
 
 And«'rsf)n v. Canadian Paoific Ry. Co. 17 A. R. 4ftO. 
 
 (17 O. R. 747j. 
 Andtrsoi: v. Fi«li (10 O. R. 470). 17 A. R. -.8. 
 
 Arclibold v. Building & L<jan Ahhoc. (15i10 A. R. 1 
 
 (J R. 237). 
 Archer v. Severn (12 O. R. 015). 
 
 Ardill V. Citizens' Inn. Co. (22 O. R. 520). 
 
 14 A. R. 723. 
 20 A. R. 005. 
 
 Jndgnient afKrniiMl. 
 
 .iriidgnient afliruu-d. 
 
 IJudgnient revernefi. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 •hidgment affirmed. 
 
 trudgment rcverMed. 
 
 i 
 
 IJudgnient affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmwl. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Arscott V. Lilley f (11 O. R. 153). 14 A. R. 2!)7. 
 
 Ull O. R. 2S5). 14 A. R. 2S3. 
 
 Atty.-Gen. v. Niagara Palls, etc.. Tram- 18 A. R. 453. 
 
 way Co. (1!> O, R. 024). 
 Atty.-Gen. v. Vaughan Road Co. 21 O. 19 A. R. 234; rev. by i Judgment rever.-sed ; re- 
 
 R. 507. Sup.Ct.21S.C.R.037. j stored on further apiK-al. 
 
 Atty.-(ien. of Canada v. Atty.-Gen. of 19 A. R. 31; aui)eal to Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Ontario (20 O. R. 222). Sup. Ct. stands for] 
 
 judgment. i 
 
 Atty.-Gen. of Canada v. City of Toronto 18 A. R. 022; rev. by Judgment affirmed, bit 
 
 (20 O. R. 10). 
 
 Sup. Ct. S. C. Dig. .57! reversed on further ap- 
 and leave to appeal to peal. 
 Pr. Coun. refused. 
 
 R^ker v. Atkinson (11 O. R. 735). 14 A. R. 409. 
 
 Paldwin v. Kingstone (10 O. R. 341). 18 A. R. 03. 
 IJall v. Cronijiton Corset Co. (9 O. R. 228). 12 A. R. 738. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Bank of Montreal v. Haflfner (30. R. 183). 10 A. R. 592; aff. by Sup. 'Judgment affinned. 
 
 Ct. S. C. Dig. 520, suh 
 
 i 1WM. Bank of Mon- 
 
 I treal v. Worswick. 
 Barber v. Clark (20 O. R. 522). |18 A. R. 435. 
 
 I 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Barton, Township of, v. Hamilton (18 O. 17A.R. 340; aflF. by Sup. Judgment affirmed. 
 R. 199). I Ct. 20S. C.R. 173. i 
 
 .M 
 
30 
 
 Cases in the High Coiui oj JiiMiee for Ontario 
 
 Cahe. 
 
 I Report ox Xstwal. Result op Appeal. 
 
 Bate V. Canadian I'acific Ry. Co. (14 0. 15 A. R. SSS; rev. by Judgment affirmed, but 
 R. C25). I Supt Ct. Is S. C. R. reversed on further ap- 
 
 &n. peaL 
 
 Beatty v. Neelon (5) O. R. 385). 12A. R.50;aff.lr/Sap. Judtrment reversed. 
 
 ! Ct. 13 S. C iC 1. 
 Beatty v. North-West Trans. Co. (6 0. R. 11 A. R. ?5i5; n\. bv Judgment reversed. 
 3(J0). j Sup.Ct.I2.<.C.R-*i4!i8;, 
 
 rest»>if«i hv Pr. Conn, i 
 
 Beatty v. Shaw (13 O. R. 21). 
 
 14 
 
 ll> Ai>pl C*s. 5tS. 
 
 VJ. AW 
 
 A. R. 
 
 tflfL 
 
 (Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Beaver v. Grand Tnink Ry. Co. (22 O. R. 20 A. R. 47«l 
 
 067). 
 Beckett v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (S O. R. 13 A. R. 174; aff.bi. Sap. Judgment affirmed by 
 
 COl). 
 Bcemer v. Oliver (3 O. R. .^)23). 
 
 Ct. 16.S.C. R 13. 
 10 A. R. «mG. 
 
 Beemer v. Village of Grimsby (8 O. R. 98). 13 A. R. '22* 
 
 Begg v. Ellison (11 C. L. T. CD). 
 Bell v. Riddell (2 O. R. 25). 
 
 14 P. R. 3S4. 
 lOA. R..H4. 
 
 Bertram v. Massey Mfg. Co. (15 O. R.I13P. R. 1.S4. 
 
 516). j 
 
 Betts v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (12 P. R.'l2 P. R. «M. 
 
 86). 
 Betts V. Smith (15 A. R. 413). 16 A. R. 421. 
 
 Bickford v. Town of Chatham (10 O. R. 
 
 257). 
 Blackley v. Kenney (19 O. R. 169). 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 14 A. R. 32 ; aff. b^ Sup. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Ct. 16 S. C. 235l i 
 
 18 A. R. V35f. Judgment leversed. 
 
 Bleakley v. Corporation of Prescott (7 12 A. R. 637. 
 
 O. k. 261). I 
 
 Bolt & Iron Co. in re. Livingstone's Caseil6 A. R. 3J*7. 
 
 (14 0. R. 211). I 
 
 Bond v. Conmee (15 O. R. 716). 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Brady v. Sadler (10 O. R. 49). 
 Brayley v. Ellis (1 O. R. 119). 
 Brice v. Munro (7 O. R. 4:J5). 
 Brown v. Rowland (9 O. R. 48). 
 Brown v. Moyer (23 O. R. 222). 
 
 Bruce, Corporation of, v. McLay (3 O. 
 R. 23). 
 
 Bull V. North British Canadian Invest- 
 ment Co. (14 O. R. 322). 
 
 Cain v. Junkin (6 O. R. 532). 
 
 Cameron v. Cusack (18 O. R. .520). 
 
 Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. v. City of Ottawa 
 (8 O. R. 201) 8 O. R. 183. 
 
 16 A. R. 396; aff. birSap. Judgment affirmed. 
 Ct. S. C. Wg. 511- 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 17 A. R. SfioL 
 9A.R. .T^o. 
 
 12 A. R. 4J3L 
 15 A. R. 75a 
 20 A. R. .309. 
 11 A. R. 477. 
 15 A. R. 42L 
 
 13 A. R. .525. 
 17 A. R. 4891 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 12 A. R. 2M:afflbr.Suii. Judgment affirmed. 
 Ct. 12 S. C. R. 365. 
 Leave to apfiieal Ut Pr. 
 Conn, granted, but 
 not proceeded with. 
 
Cai^ied to the Court of Appeal. 
 
 .31 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Rei'okt on Appkal. 
 
 Result ok Api'kai-. 
 
 Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. v. Township of 14 A. R.2fl!);aff. by Sup. Judgment, n-vtrstd. 
 Cambridge (11 O. R. 3!)2). | Ct. 1". S. C. R. 219. 
 
 Leave to appeal 
 
 I granted, but not pro- 
 
 ! ceeded with. 
 
 Canada Cotton Co. v, Parmalee (13 P. R. 13 P. R. 308. 
 
 2(;). 
 
 Canada Land Co. v. Municipality of Dysart 12 A. R. 80. 
 
 (9 O. R. 4a>, 520). 
 Canada Temi»erance Act, in re (9 O. R. 12 A. R. 677. 
 
 1.54). 
 Canadian L<K»motive Co. v. Copeland (14 IG A. R. 322. 
 
 O. R. 170). 
 Carey v. City of Toronto (7 O. R. 194). 
 
 Carter v. Grasset (11 O. R. 331). 
 
 Central Bank of Canada, in re. Raines's 10 A. R. 237. 
 Case (10 O. R 210). 
 
 Central Bank, in re Xasmith's Case (1G18 A. R. 209 
 O. R. 2J)3). 
 
 Central Bank v. Garland (20 O. R. 142) 
 
 Ch mberlen v. Clark (1 O. R. 135). 
 
 Charles, in re Fulton v. Whatmough (1 0. 
 
 R. 362». 
 Clark and Township of Howard, in re (14 
 
 O. R. ."iOS). 
 Clarkson v. Attj'.-Gen. of Canada (15 O. 
 
 R. (j;}2). 
 Clarkson v. Sterling (14 O. R. 460). 
 
 Clayton v. McConnell (14 O. R. 608). 
 
 Clouse V. Canada Southern Ry. Co. (4 O. 
 
 R. 28). 
 
 Cochrane v. Boucher (3 O. R. 462). 
 
 Cole V. HaU (12 P. R. 584). 
 Con-ioUy v. Murrell (14 P. R. 187). 
 
 Conwav v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. (7 O. 
 
 R."673). 
 Cosgrave Brewing & Malting Co. v. Starrs 
 
 (5 O. R. 189). 
 
 Cottingham v. Cottingham (5 O. R. 704). 
 
 Court V. Walsh (1 O. R. 167). 
 
 Coyne v. Broddy (13 O. R. 173). 
 
 Crain v. Rapple (22 O. R. 519. 
 
 Ooft and Tou-n of Peterboro', in re (17 O. 
 
 R. .')22). 
 Culverwell v. Bimey (11 O. R. 265). 
 
 Judgment reversed 
 j in part. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 iJudgment affinnt<l. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 11 A. R. 416; atF. by Sup. Judgment rever.s(:-d 
 
 Ct. 14 S. C. . 172. 
 14 A. R. 685. Judgment rtverst d. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 'Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed ; re- 
 versed on further ay- 
 Vieal. 
 
 Leave to appt-al reftistd, 
 tliere being no judg- 
 nient to a]j]jeal from. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment iiffinned ; re- 
 ver.sed uw further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment attinned. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 18 A. R. 438. 
 
 9 A. R. 273. 
 
 10 A. R. 281. 
 16 A. R. 72. 
 
 16 A. R. 202. 
 15 A. R. 234. 
 15 A. R. 560. 
 
 11 A. R. 287 ; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. 13 S. C. R. 
 139. 
 
 8 A. R. 555. 
 
 13 P. R. 100. 
 
 14 P. R. 270. 
 
 12 A. R. 708. 
 
 11 A. R. 156 ; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. 12 S. C. R. 
 571. 
 
 11 A. R. f521. 
 
 9 A. R. 294. 
 
 15 A. R. 159. 
 20 A. R. 291. 
 
 17 A. R. 21. 
 14 A. R. 266. 
 
 I -i;- 
 
; : 
 
 I 32 Cases in the High Court of Justice for Ontario 
 
 1 
 
 Cask. Repobt on Appeal, 
 
 Result of Appeal. 
 
 Cumberland V, Kearns (18 0, R, 151), 17 A, R, 281. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Cumniing v. Landed Banking & Loan Co, 
 (20 0. R. 382) IJ) O, R. 42G, 
 
 Dancej' v. Grand Trunk Ry, Co. (20 0. R. 
 
 603). 
 Davis V. Lewis (8 O. R. 1), 
 
 19 A, R, 447 : rev, by 
 Sup, Ct, 22 S, C. R. 
 246. 
 
 19 A. R, 664, 
 
 23 C, L, J. 294. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Davies v, Gillard (21 0. R. 431). |l9 A. R. 432. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 1 Doan V. Michigan Central Ry, Co, (18 0, 
 R. 482). 
 Dobell V, Ontario Bank and John Rochestf^r 
 (3 0. R. 2'Jlt). 
 
 Donovan v. Herbert (9 O. R, 89). 
 
 Dorland v, Jones (7 O. R. 17), 
 
 Douglas V. Hutchison (6 0, R. .581), 
 
 17 A, R, 481. 
 9 A. R, 484, 
 
 12A.R.298;aff.bvSup. 
 
 Ct. S. C. Di(r. 653. 
 12A.R,543;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct, 14 S. C. R. 39, 
 12 A. R. 110, 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirui.-d as to 
 llo'^iester ; revised as 
 to Ontario Ban):. 
 
 Judgment afMin ed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Dover, Township of, v, Chatham (5 0, R. 
 ^ 325), 
 
 Duggan v, London & Canadian Loan Co, 
 •(19 0, R. 272), 
 
 Duncan v. Rogers (15 O, R, 699), 
 
 Dunlop v, Dunlop (6 O, R. 141), 
 
 llA,R,248;afr.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 12 S, C, R. 321. 
 18 A. R, 305 ; rev, by 
 
 Sup, Ct, 20 S, C, R. 
 
 481, but restored by 
 
 P,C.[1893]A.C.506. 
 16 A. R, 3 ; reversed in 
 
 part by Sup. Ct, 18 S. 
 
 C. R, 710, 
 10 A, R. 670. 
 
 Judgment affirmed bj' 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgiuent reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reveri-ed. 
 
 Duncan v. Tees (11 P, R, 66). 
 
 11 P. R. 296. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Dyment v, Thomson (9 O, R, 566), 
 
 Eastman v. Bank of Montreal (10 0, R. 
 79). 
 1 Eberts v. Brooke (10 P. R. 257), 
 
 12A.R.659;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 13 S. C. R. 303. 
 23 C. L. J. 235. 
 
 11 P. R. 296. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 ll Edgar v. Northern Ry, Co. (4 O, R, 201), 
 
 11 A. R, 452, 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Edmtmds v. Hamilton Provident & Loan 
 Soc. (19 O, R. 677). 
 
 Electric I)espateh Co. of Toronto v. Bell 
 aji Telephone Co. (17 O, R. 495). 
 11 Elliott v. Brown (2 O, R, 352), 
 
 18 A, R, 347. 
 
 17A,R,292;afr,bvSup. 
 
 Ct, 20 S, C. R, 83, 
 11 A, R, 228, 
 
 Judgment reversed in 
 
 part. 
 Judgment affinned by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 if Erdman v. Town of Walkerton (22 0. R. 
 '! 693). 
 5 Faulds v, Harjier (2 O, R. 405), 
 
 1 Finch V, Gilray (16 O, R, 393). 
 
 20 A, R, 444. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 9 A. R. 537; rev. by Sup. 
 
 Ct. 11 S. C, R. 639, 
 16 A. R. 484. 
 
 Judgment reversed ; re- 
 stored on further ai)peal. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 il Fleming, in re (11 P. R. 272). 
 
 11 P, R. 426. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 ll Fleming v. City of Toronto (20 O. R. 547). 
 
 19A. R, 318, 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 *1\ Forbes v. Michigan Central Ry. Co. (22 
 ai O, R. 568). 
 ■■ Fox V. Symington (9 0, R, 767). 
 
 20 A, R, 584, 
 13 A. R. 296. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reverhed. 
 
Carried to the Court of Appeal. 
 
 88 
 
 CA8B. 
 
 Freidrich v. Freidrich (10 P. R 308). 
 
 Friendly v. Needles (10 P. R. 267). 
 
 Gage V. Canada Pub. Co. (6 O. R 68). 
 
 Gibbons v, McDonald (19 O. R. 290). 
 
 Gibbons v. Wilson (17 O. R 290). 
 
 Godson and City of Toronto, in re (16 O. 
 . R 275). 
 Goldsmith v. City of London (11 0. R. 26). 
 
 Gooderham v. City of Toronto (21 O. R. 
 
 120). 
 Gould V. Hope (21 O. R 624). 
 
 Grant v. Camock (16 O. R. 406]. 
 
 Gray v. Town of Dundas (11 O. R. 317). 
 
 Green v. Corporation of Orford (15 O. R. 
 
 506). 
 Green v. Watson (2 O. R. 627). 
 
 Hager v. O'Neill (21 O. R. 27). 
 
 Hall V. Farquharson (13 O. R. 598). 
 
 Hall V. Hall (20 O. R. 684) 20 O. R 168. 
 
 Hall Mfg. Co. V. Hazlett (8 O. R 465). 
 
 Hamilton v. Groesbeck (19 O. R. 76). 
 
 Hamilton Provident & Loan Soc. v. Camp- 
 'lell (5 O. R 371). 
 
 Hands v. Law Society of Upper Canada 
 (17 O. R. 300) 16 O. R. 625. 
 
 Harvey v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (9 P. R. 
 80). 
 
 Harvey and Town of Parkdale, in re (16 
 O.' R. 372). 
 
 Hately v. Merchants' Despatch Transpor- 
 tation Co. (4 O. R. 723). 
 (11 P. R 9). 
 
 Hayes v. Elmsley (21 O. R. 562). 
 
 Heaslip v. Heaslip (14 P. R. 21). 
 
 Henderson v. Bank of Hamilton (23 O. R. 
 
 327). 
 Henderson v. Killey (14 O. R. 137). 
 
 Hendrie v. Neelon (3 O. R. 603). 
 
 Hilliard v. Arthur (10 P. R. 281). 
 M.D.— 3 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 10 P. R 546. 
 10 P. R 427. 
 
 llA.R403;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct.llS.C. R306. 
 18A.R.1.59;af!.bySup. 
 
 Ct.20 8. C. R587. 
 
 17 A. R 1. 
 
 16A.R452;aff.bvSup. 
 
 Ct. 18 S. C. R. "36. 
 23 C. L.J. 294; rev. by 
 
 Sup. Ct. 16 S. C. R 
 
 231. 
 
 19 A.' R 641. 
 
 20 A. R. 247. 
 16 A. R. 532. 
 
 13 A. R 588. 
 
 16 A. R 4. 
 
 10 A. R 113. 
 20 A. R 198. 
 
 15 A. R. 457. 
 19 A. R. 292. 
 
 11 A. R, 749. 
 
 18 A. R. 437. 
 
 12 A. R 2r.O. 
 
 17 A. R. 41. 
 7 A. R. 715. 
 
 16 A. R. 468. 
 
 12A.R.201;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 14 S. C. R 572. 
 12 A. R. 640. 
 
 19 A. R 291 ; rev, by 
 
 Sup. Ct. 
 
 14 P. R. 165. 
 
 20 A. R. 646. 
 
 17 A. R 466; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. 18 S. C. R. 
 698, 8uh nom. Osborne 
 V. Henderson. 
 
 12 A. R. 41. 
 
 10 P. R. 426. 
 
 Result of Appeal. 
 
 Judgment varied on 
 
 re-hearing. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 equal division ; reversed 
 on further appeal. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 •Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed!. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 
 by equal division. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 equal division, and re- 
 versed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
Mi 
 
 34 
 
 Cases in the High Court of Justice for Ontario 
 
 Case. 
 
 \: 
 
 Hislop V. Township of McGillivray (12 O. 
 
 R. 749). 
 Hobbs V. Guardian Assur. Co. (7 O. R. \ 
 
 634). 
 Hobbs V. Northern Ins. Co. (8 O. R. 343). J 
 
 Hogaboom v. Cox (15 P. R. 23). 
 
 Holliday v. Hogan (22 O. R. 235). 
 
 Hollinger v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. (21 
 
 O. R. 705). 
 Howes V. Dominion Fire & Marine Inf<. 
 
 Co. (2 O. R. 89). 
 Hugg^ns V. Law (11 O. R. 5C5). 
 
 Humphrey v. Archibald (21 O. R. 553). 
 
 Huntington v. Attrill (17 O. R. 245). 
 
 Hutchinson v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. 
 
 (17 O. R. ;«7). 
 Hyatt V. Mills (20 O. R. 351). 
 
 International Wrecking Co. v. Lobb (11 
 O. R. 408). 
 
 Jack V. Jack (10 O. R. 1). 
 
 James v. Ontario & Quebec Ry. Co. (12 O. 
 
 R. 624). 
 Jarrard, ir ■ (4 O. R. 265). 
 
 Johnston v. Oliver (3 O. R. 26). 
 
 Jordan v. Dunn (13 O. R. 267). 
 
 Kent V. Kent (20 O. R. 445). 
 Kloepfer v. Gardner (10 O. R. 415). 
 Knight V. Medora (11 O. R. 138). 
 
 Lawson v. McGeoch (22 O. R. 474). 
 
 Leach v. Grank Trunk Ry. Co. (13 P. R. 
 
 388). 
 Lee V. MacMahon (2 O. R. 654). 
 
 Leeds & Grenville v. Brockville (17 O. R. 
 
 261). 
 Leitch V. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (12 P. R. 
 
 671) 12 P. R 541. 
 Lemay v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. (18 O. 
 
 R. 314). 
 Lemay v. McRae (16 O. R. 307). 
 
 Lemesurier v. Macaulay (22 O. R. 316). 
 
 Rrpobt on Appeal. 
 
 15A.R.687;aflF.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 17 S. C. R. 479. 
 11 A. R. 741; rev. by 
 
 Sup. Ct. 12 S. C. R. 
 
 631. 
 
 15 P. R. 127. 
 
 20 A. R. 298. 
 
 20 A. R. 244. 
 
 8 A. R. 644. 
 
 14 A. R. 383. 
 
 20 A. R. 267. 
 
 18 A. R. 136 ; rev. by 
 Pr.Coun.[1893]A.C. 
 150 
 
 16 A.' R. 429. 
 
 19 A. R. 329. 
 12 P. R. 207. 
 
 12 A. R. 476. 
 15 A. R. L 
 
 20 C. L. J. 145. 
 
 None ; aff. by Sup. Ct. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 651. 
 15 A. R. 744. 
 
 119 A. R. 352. 
 
 I 
 
 14A.R.60;aflF.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 15 S. C. R. 390. 
 14 A. R. 112. 
 
 20 A. R. 464. 
 
 13 P. R. 467. 
 11 A. R. 555. 
 18 A. R. 548. 
 13 P. R. 369. 
 17 A. R. 2!)3. 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment in both cases 
 affirmed, but reversed 
 on further appeal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal quashed, being 
 deemed abandoned by 
 proceedings. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Il6 A. R. 348; aff. by Sup. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 [ Ct. 18 S. C. R. 280. I 
 
 20 A. R. 421. I Judgment affirmed. 
 
 I-' i 
 VI! 
 
Carried to the Court of Appeal. 
 
 35 
 
 ;:;i 
 
 Cask, 
 
 Rkpoht on Api'eal. 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 ! 
 
 Lett V. St. Lawrence & Ottawa Ry, Co. 11 A. R. 1; aff. by Sup. 
 
 (1 O. R. 545). 
 
 Lilley & AUin, in re (21 O. R. 424). 
 
 London & Canadian Loan Co. v. Morphy 
 
 (10 O. R. 86). 
 London Mutual Ins. Co. v. City of London 
 
 (11 O. R. 592). 
 Long V. Hancock (7 O. R. 154). 
 
 Long Point Co. v. Anderson (19 O. R. 487). 
 
 LowBon V. Canadian Farmei-s' Co. (9 P. R. 
 
 185). 
 
 Macdonnell v. Robinson (8 O. R. 53). 
 Maclennan v. Gray (16 O. R. 321). 
 
 Magee v. Gilmore (17 O. R. 620). 
 
 Magurn v. Magum (3 O. R. 570). 
 
 Maritime Bank v. Stewart (13 P. R. 262) 
 
 13 P. R. 86. 
 Marsh v. Webb (21 O. R. 281). 
 
 Marshall v. McRae (16 O. R. 495). 
 
 Martin v. Magee (19 O. R. 705). 
 
 Martin v. McAlpine (3 O. R. 499). 
 
 Martin v. McMuUen (20 O. R. 257) 19 O. 
 
 R. 230. 
 Masse v. Masse (10 P. R. 674). 
 
 Massey Mfg. Co. in re (11 O. R. 441). 
 
 Matthews v. Hamilton Powder Co. (12 O. 
 
 R. 58). 
 Marthinson v. Patterson (20 O. R. 720) 20 
 
 O. R. 125). 
 Mendellshon Co. v. Graham (19 O. R. 83) 
 
 Merchants' Bank v. Lucas (13 O. R. 520). 
 
 Midland Railway Co. v. Ontario Rolling 
 
 Mills Co. (2 b. R. 1). 
 Miller v. Brown (3 O. R. 210). 
 
 Miller v. Confederation Life Ins. Co. (11 
 
 O. R. 120). 
 Mingeaud v. Packer (21 O. R. 2G7). 
 
 Mitchell V. Gormley (9 O. R. 139). 
 
 C.11S.C.R.422, and 
 leave to appeal toPr. 
 Coun. refused. 
 19 A. R. 101. 
 
 14 A. R. 677. 
 
 15 A. R. 629. 
 
 12 A. R. 137 ; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. 12 S. C. R. 
 532. 
 
 18 A. R. 401. 
 
 8 A. R. 613. 
 
 12 A. R. 270. 
 
 16 A. R. 224 ; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct, 18 S. C. R. 
 553 suit nom. Gray v. 
 Coughlin. 
 
 17A.R.27;afiF.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 18 S. C. R. 579. 
 11 A. R. 178. 
 
 13 P. R. 491 ; appeal to 
 Sup. Ct. quashed. 
 
 19 A. R. 564 ; aff. by 
 Sup. Ct. 
 
 17 A. R. 139 ; rev. by 
 Sup.Ct. 19S.C.R.10. 
 
 18 A. R. 384. 
 
 8 A. R. 675. 
 
 18 A. R. 559. 
 11 P. R. 81. 
 
 13 A. R. 446. 
 
 14 A. R. 261. 
 
 19 A. R. 188. 
 
 17 A. R. 37H. 
 
 15A.R.573;aflf.bvSup. 
 
 Ct.l8S.C.R.704. 
 10 A. R. 677. 
 
 9 P. R. 542. 
 
 14 A. R. 218; aff. by Sup. 
 
 Ct. 14 S. C. R. 330. 
 19 A. R. 290. 
 
 14 A. R. 55. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 equal divisiun, and re- 
 versed on further api^eal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed ; 
 
 reversed on further 
 
 appeal. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Leave to apiwal refused, 
 notice not given in time. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 «>9i| 
 
 m 
 

 86 
 
 Cases in the High Court of Justice for Ontario 
 
 Case. 
 
 vr X 
 
 i* **' 
 
 It' 
 I 
 
 'I 
 
 Report on Apfeal. 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 Mitchell V. City of London Assur. Co. (12 
 O. R. 706). 
 
 Moffatt V. Scratch (8 O. R. 147) 6 O. R. 
 564. 
 
 Monteith v. Merchants' Despatch Trans- 
 portation Co. (1 O. R. 47). 
 
 Moorehouse v. Bostwick (5 O. R. 1(M). 
 
 Morton v. Hamilton Provident & Loan 
 
 Soc. (10 P. R. 636). 
 Moses V. Moses (13 P. R. 12). 
 
 Moxley v. Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. (10 P. 
 
 R. 653). 
 MacDonald v. Cronibie (2 O. R. 2-i3). 
 
 MacDonnell v. Blake (17 0. R. 104). 
 
 MacDonnell v. Robinson (8 O. R. 53). 
 
 MacDoujfall, in re (13 O. R. 204). 
 
 McArthur v. Northern & Pacific Junction 
 
 Ry. Co. (15 O. R. 733). 
 McCarthy v. Cooper (8 O. R. 316). 
 
 McCraney v. McCool (19 O. R. 470). 
 
 MacDonald v. Field (9 P. R. 220). 
 
 McDonald v. Murray (2 O. R. 573). 
 
 McDonald v. McCall (9 O. R. 185). 
 
 McGeachie v. North American Life Assur. 
 
 Co. (22 O. R. 151). 
 McGibbon v. Northern Ry. Co. (11 O. R. 
 
 307). 
 McGregor v. Norton (13 P. R. 28). 
 
 McGugan v. McGugan (21 O. R. 289), 
 
 McKay v. Magee (13 P. R. 106). 
 
 McKenzie v. Dwight (2 O. R. 366). 
 
 McLaren v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. 
 
 (7 O. R. 64). 
 McLean v. Brown (15 O. R. 313). 
 
 McLean v. Clark (21 O. R. 683). 
 
 MoMichael v. Wilkie (19 O. R. 739). 
 
 McMillan v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (12 O. 
 R. 103). 
 
 McNeeley v. Williams (9 O. R. 728). 
 
 15 A. R. 262. 
 
 12 A. R. 157. 
 
 9 A. R. 282. 
 
 11 \.. R. 76. 
 11 P. R. 82. 
 
 13 P. R. 144. 
 11 P. R. 39. 
 
 ^R. 92;aff.bySup. 
 -'^ US. C. R. 107. 
 7 R. 312. 
 
 12 A. R. 270. 
 
 I A. I . "*; rov. by 
 bup. iX IS S, 0. R. 
 203. 
 
 17 A. R. 86. 
 12 A. R. 284. 
 
 18 A. R. 217. 
 
 12 P. R. 213. 
 
 II A. R. 101. 
 
 12A.R.593;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 13 S. C. R. 247. 
 20 A. R. 187. 
 
 14 A. R. 91. 
 
 13 P. R. 223. 
 
 19A.R. 56;aflF.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 21 S. C. R. 267. 
 13 P. R. 146. 
 
 11 A. R. 381. 
 
 12 A. R. 279. 
 16 A. R. 106. 
 20 A. R. 660. 
 18 A. R. 548. 
 
 15 A. R. 14; rev. by Sup. 
 Ct. 16 S. C. R. 543, 
 and leave to appeal to 
 Pr. Coun. refused. 
 
 13 A. R. 324. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 'Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 'Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment reversed 
 
 in part. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 i'i ! 
 
Carried to the Court of Appeal. 
 
 37 
 
 Case. 
 
 mt 
 ip- 
 
 McRae and Ontario & Quebec Ry. Co., tn 
 
 re (12 P. R. 282). 
 New Hamburg v. County of Waterloo (22 
 
 O. R. 193). 
 
 Niagara Grape Co. v. Nellis (13 P. R. 179). 
 
 Oakville, Corporation of, in re (9 O. R. 
 
 274). 
 Oakwood High Schoc/l Board, in re (15 O. 
 
 R. 68G). 
 
 O'Brien v. Clarkson (2 O. R. 525). 
 O'Donohoe, in re f (12 P. R. 612). 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Result of Appeal. 
 
 c 
 
 J14 P. R. 571). 
 O'Donohoe v. Whitby (2 O. R. 424). 
 
 O'Meara v. City of Ottawa (11 O. R. 603). 
 
 Ontario & Quebec Ry. Co. v. Philbrick 
 
 (5 O. R. 674). 
 Ontario Loan & Debenture Co. v. Hobbs 
 
 (15 O. R. 440). 
 Ontario Natural Gas Co. v. Gosfield (19 O. 
 
 R. 591). 
 Ostrom and Township of Sidney, m re (15 
 
 O. R. 43). 
 Owen Sound S. S. Co. v. Canadian Pacific 
 
 Ry. Co. (17 O. R. 691). 
 Paisley v. Wills (19 O. R. 303). 
 
 Parkes v. St. George (20. R. 342). 
 
 Partlo V. Todd (120. R. 171). 
 
 12 P. R. 327. 
 
 20 A. R. 1 ; rev. by Sup. 
 Ct.22S. C.R.296. 
 
 13 P. R. 258. 
 12 A. R. 225, 
 
 16 A. R. 87 tub nom. Re 
 Oakwood and Town- 
 ship of Mariposa. 
 
 10 A. R. 603. 
 
 14P.R.317;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 19S.C. R. 356. 
 15 P. R. 93. 
 20 C. L. J. 146. 
 
 15A.R.75;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 14 S. C. R. 742. 
 None ; afF. by Sup. Ct. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 288. 
 16A.R.255;rev.bySup. 
 
 Ct.lSS. C.R. 483. 
 18 A. R. 626. 
 
 15 A. R. 372. 
 
 17 A. R. 482. 
 
 18 A. R. 210. 
 10 A. R. 496. 
 
 Peterboro' Real Estate Co. v. Patterson 
 
 (13 O. R. 142). 
 Petrie v. Guelph Lumber Co. (2 O. R. 218) 
 
 Petrie v. Hunter (2 O. R. 233). 
 
 Phipps, in re (1 O. R. 585). 
 
 Pierce v. Palmer (12 P. R. 275). 
 
 Plumb V. Steinhof! (2 O. R. 614). 
 
 Potts V. Boivine (16 O. R. 152). 
 
 Powell V. Peck ) ,.cyr^ ^ 4qo\ 
 Peck V. Powell J ^^^ "• ^- *"''*'■ 
 
 Pratt V. City of Stratford (14 O. R. 260). 
 
 Pryce and City of Toronto, in re (16 O. R. 
 
 726). 
 Ratte V. Booth (11 O. R. 491) 10 O. R. 351. 
 
 Reddick v. Saugeen Mutual Insur. Co. (14 
 O. R. 596). 
 
 14A.R.444;aflF.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 17 S. C. R. 196. 
 15 A. R. 751. 
 
 llA.R.3;i6;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. lis. C.R. 450. 
 10 A. R. 127. 
 
 19 C. 
 
 L. 
 
 J. 110. 
 
 
 12 P. 
 
 R. 
 
 308. 
 
 
 11 A.R.788;aff.bySHp. 
 
 Ct. 14 S. C. R. 739. 
 16 A. R. 191. 
 
 15 A. 
 
 R. 
 
 138. 
 
 • 
 
 16 A. 
 
 R. 
 
 5. 
 
 
 20 A. 
 
 R. 
 
 16. 
 
 
 14 A. 
 
 R. 
 
 419. 
 
 
 15 A. 
 
 R. 
 
 363. 
 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 equal division ; reversed 
 on further apiieal. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 
 bv equal division. 
 
 •Tudgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed ; re- 
 stored on further appeal. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal not entertained. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment in both 
 cases affirmed. 
 
 •Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Tudgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
38 
 
 Cases in the High Court of Justice for Ontario 
 
 Cahk. 
 
 i 
 
 '1 : 
 
 
 Reg. V. County of Wellington (17 O. R. 
 616). 
 
 Reg. V. Elborne (21 O. R. 504). 
 Reg. V. Eli (10 O. R. 727). 
 Reg. V. Hazen (23 O. R. 387). 
 Reg. V. Rowland (11 O. R. 633). 
 
 Reg. V. St. Catharines' Milling Co. (10 O. 
 R. 1%). 
 
 Reg. V. Wason (17 O. R. 58). 
 
 Reid V. Murphy (12 P. R. 246). 
 
 Ringrose v. Ringrose (10 P. R. 299). 
 
 Roberts v. Donovan (21 O. R. 535). 
 
 Robertson and North Easthope, in re (15 
 
 O. R. 423). 
 Robinson v. Harris (21 O. R. 43. 
 
 Rogers v. Wilson (12 P. R. 322). 
 
 Ross V. Edwards (14 P. R. 523). 
 
 Ryan v. Bank of Montreal (12 O. R. 39). 
 
 Ryan v. Cooley (14 O. R. 13). 
 
 Saderquist v. Ontario Bank (14 O. R. 586). 
 
 Sawyer v. Pringle (20 O. R, 111). 
 
 Saylor v. Cooper (2 O. R. 398). 
 
 Scott V. Corix)ration of Tilsonburgh (10 O. 
 
 R. 119). 
 Scott V. Crerar (11 O. R. 541). 
 
 Scott V. Niagara Navigation Co. (15 P. R. 
 
 409). 
 Scribner v. McLaren (2 O. R. 265). 
 
 Seymour v. Lynch (7 O. R 471). 
 Sheard v. Laird (15 0. R. 533). 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Result of Appeal. 
 
 Sibbald v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. 
 Tremayne v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (19 
 O. R. 164). 
 
 } 
 
 17A.R.421;aff.bySup. 
 Ct. sub nom. Quirt v. 
 The Qiieen, 19 S. C. 
 R. 610. 
 
 19 A. R. 439. 
 
 13 A. R. 520. 
 
 20 A. R. 633. 
 
 14 A. R. 184 ; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. sub nom. Re 
 0'Brien,16S.C.R. 197 
 
 13A.R.148;aflF.bySup. 
 Ct. 13 S. C. R. 577, 
 and by Pr. Coun. 14 
 App. Cas. 46. 
 
 17 A. R. 221. 
 
 12 P. R. 338. 
 
 10 P. R. 596. 
 
 30C.L. J. 33. sub nom. 
 
 Berry v. Donovan. 
 16 A. R. 214. 
 
 19A.R.1.34;rev.bySup. 
 Ct. 21 S. C. R. 390. 
 
 12 P. R. 545. 
 15 P. R. 150. 
 
 14 A. R. 533. 
 
 15 A. R. 379. 
 15 A. R. 609. 
 18 A. R. 218. 
 8 A. R. 707. 
 
 13 A. R. 233. 
 
 14 A. R. 152. 
 
 30 C. L. J. 37. 
 
 12 A. R. 367 sub mm. 
 Scribner v. Kinloch; 
 aff. by Sup. Ct. 14 S. 
 
 14A.R'.738;aflf.bySup. 
 Ct. 15 S. C. R. 341. 
 
 15 A. R. 339. 
 
 18A. R.184;aflf.bySup. 
 Ct. 20 S. C. R. 259. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Appeal quashed. 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, re- 
 versed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 equal division, but re- 
 versed on further ap- 
 ical. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 on equal division. 
 Judgment varied . 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 -Judgment affirmed. 
 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 •Judgment affirmed by 
 equal division and 
 on further apjieal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 ml 
 
Carried to the Court of Appeal. 
 
 39 
 
 Cahe. 
 
 Report on Appeal. Result of Appeal. 
 
 Sievewright v. Leys (1 O. R. 375). 
 Sinden v. Brown (17 O. R. 706). 
 Skinner, in re (13 P. R. 276). 
 Smart, in re. (12 P. R. 435) 12 P. R. 312. 
 
 Smith V. Fleming (12 P. R. 520). 
 Smith V. London Ins. Co. (11 O. R. 38). 
 Smith V. Millions (15 O. R. 453). 
 Smith V. McLellan (11 0. R. 191). 
 
 Smith V. Port Dover & Lake Huron Ry. 
 
 Co. (8 O. R. 256). 
 Standard Fire Ins. Co., in re. Barber's Case, 
 
 Copp, Clark & Co.'8 Case (7 O. R. 448). 
 Standard Fire Ins. Co. in re. Ca8t«m's Case 
 
 (7 O. R. 448). 
 Standard Fire Insurance Co. in re. Kelly's 
 
 Case (7 O. R. 204). 
 St. Denis v. Baxter (13 O. R. 41). 
 
 Stevens v. Barfoot (9 O. R. 692). 
 
 Stevenson v. Davis (21 O. R. 642). 
 
 Stillwell V. Rennie (7 O. R. 355). 
 
 St. Vincent v. Greenfield (12 O. R. 297). 
 
 Sutherland v. Cox (6 O. R. 505). 
 
 Temperance Colonization Co. v. Evans (12 
 
 P. R. 48). 
 Temperance Colonization Co. v. Fairfield 
 
 (16 O. R. 544). 
 Thames Navigation Co. v. Reid (9 O. R. 
 
 754). 
 Thompson v. Hay (22 0. R. 583). 
 
 Thompson v. Robinson (15 O. R. 662). 
 
 Thorold, Town of, v. Neelon (20 O. R. 86). 
 
 Todd v. Dun Wiman & Co, (12 O. R. 791). 
 
 Tomlinson v. Northern Ry. Co. (11 P. R. 
 
 419). 
 Toronto and Toronto Street Ry. Co., in re 
 
 (22 O. R. 374). 
 
 Travis v. Travis (8 O. R. 516). 
 Trinity College v. Hill (2 O. R. 348). 
 
 20 C. L. J. 145. 
 17 A. R. 173. 
 
 15 P. R, 447. 
 12 P. R. 636. 
 
 12 P. R. 657. 
 
 14 A. R. 328. 
 
 16 A. R. 140. 
 
 15 A. R. 738 8ub nom. 
 Smith v. Chishome. 
 
 12 A. R. 288. 
 
 12 A. R. 486. 
 12 A. R. 486. 
 
 12 A. R. 486. 
 15 A. R. 387. 
 
 13 A. R. 366. 
 
 Judgment affirmed . 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, and 
 appeal to Supreme Ct. 
 quashed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed 
 in part 
 
 Sup. Ct, 
 
 11 A. R. 724. 
 
 15 A. R. 567. 
 
 15A.R.541;aff.bySup. 
 Ct. S. C. Dig. 9. 
 
 12 P. R. 380. 
 
 17 A. R. 205. 
 
 13 A. R. 303. 
 20 A. R. 379. 
 
 16 A. R. 175. 
 
 18 A. R. 658 ; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. 22 S. C. R. 
 3!H). 
 
 5 A. R. 85. 
 
 11 P. R. 526. 
 
 20 A. R. 125; aff. by 
 Pr. Coun. [1893J A. 
 C. 511. 
 
 12 A. R. 438. 
 
 10 A. R. 99. 
 
 in part. 
 19 A. R. 591 ; rev. by Judgment affirmed, but 
 SuD. Ct. reversed on further ap- 
 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 .Judgment aflfirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed 
 
 in part. 
 Judgment reversed in 
 
 part, but restored on 
 
 further ai>iJeal. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal not entertainiKl. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 i 
 
I ' 
 
 < ■ 
 
 40 Cases in High Court of Justice carried to Court of Ai^peal. 
 
 H 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Rkpokt on Appkal. 
 
 lip 
 
 
 \m 
 
 Trust & Loan Co. v. StevenHon (21 O. R. 
 
 671). 
 
 Union Fire Ins. Co., in re (10 O. R. 489). 
 
 VanKoughnet v. Denison (1 O. R. 349). 
 Vansickle v. Vansickle (1 O. R. 107). 
 
 Vickcrs' Express Co. v. Canadian Pacific 
 
 Rjr. Co. (9 O. R. 251). 
 Victoria, County of, v. County of Peter- 
 
 boro' (1.5 O. R. 440). 
 Vogel V. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. 
 Morton v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (2 
 
 R. 197). 
 
 .,} 
 
 Waldie and Village of Burlington in re 
 
 (7 O. R. 192). 
 Warin v. London & Canadian Loan Ca 
 
 (7 O. R. 70«). 
 Warnock v. Kloepfer (14 O. R. 288). 
 
 20 A. R. 06. 
 
 13 A. R. 268 ; rev. by 
 Sup. Ct. 14 S. C. R. 
 624. 
 
 11 A. R. 699. 
 
 9 A. R. 352. 
 13 A. R. 210. 
 
 15A.R.617;af!.bySup. 
 
 Ct. S. C. Dig. 558. 
 10A.R.162;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 11 S. C. R. 612. 
 
 13 A. R. 104. 
 
 12A.R.327;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 14 8. C. R. 232. 
 15A.R.324;aff.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 18 S. C. R. 701. 
 19A.R.47;aflF.bySup. 
 
 Ct. 21 S. C. R. .556. 
 20 A. R. 528. 
 
 Rkbult of Appbal. 
 
 Waterous v. Town of Palmerston (20 O. R 
 
 411). 
 Weegar v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. 23 O. R 
 
 436). I 
 
 Wells V. Lindop (14 O. R. 275) 13 O. R.I15 A. R. 695. 
 
 434. 
 West V. Parkdale. 'k 12 A. R. 393 ; rev. by 
 
 Carroll v. Parkdale (8 O. R. 59) 7 O. R. }■ Sup. Ct. 12 S. C. R. 
 
 270. J 250. and by Pr. Coun. 
 
 12 App. Cas. 602. 
 Western Aasur. Co. v. Ontario Coal Co. 19 A. R. 41 ; aff. by Sup. 
 
 (20 O. R. .595) 19 O. R. 462. | Ct. 21 S. C. R. 383. 
 
 Western Canada Loan & {Savings Co. v. 9 P. R. 587. 
 
 Dunn (9 P. R. 490). i 
 
 White y. Township of Gosfield (2 O. R. 10 A. R. 555. 
 
 12 A. R. 119. 
 
 13 A. R. 7; aff. by Sup. 
 Ct. 14 S. C. R. 515. 
 
 13 A. R. 486. 
 
 13 A. R. 467; rev. by 
 Sup.Ct.liS.C.R.22. 
 
 11 A. R. 675; aff. by Sup. 
 
 Ct. 12 S. C. R. 517. 
 13 A. R. 129. 
 
 19 A. R. 265; aff. by Sup. 
 Ct. 22 S. C. R. 190. 
 
 20 A. R. 645. 
 
 287), 
 Whiting v. Honey (9 O. R. 314), 
 
 •{ 
 
 Wicksteed v. Munro (10 O. R. 283). 
 Wilkins v. McLean (10 O. R. 58). 
 
 York, County of, v. Toronto Gravel Co. 
 
 (3 O. R. 584). 
 Yost v. Adams (8 O. R. 411). 
 
 Young v. Midland Ry. Co. (16 O. R. 738). 
 
 Young v. Saylor (23 O. R. 513). 
 
 Zimmer v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (21 0. R. il9 A. R. 693. 
 
 628). 
 Zoological Society of Ontario, in re Cox's 16 A. R. 543. 
 
 Case (17 O. R. 331). 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment aflfirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 equal division and on 
 further appeal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgement affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Motion to qnash appeal 
 
 refused. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judg^nent affirmed 
 by equal division. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 I 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
[41] 
 
 CASES IN THE COUETS OF LOWER CANADA 
 • AND QUEBEC CARRIED TO THE 
 PRIVY COUNCIL. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 but 
 ■ ap- 
 
 Abbott V. McGibbon (28 L. C. J. 120, 7 L. 
 
 N. 170) 5 L. N. 431. 
 Allan V. Pratt (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 7). 
 
 Allan V. Queliec Warehouse Co. 
 
 Angers, Atty.-Gen. v. Murray, 3 L. N. 
 108 ; 25 L. C. J. 208. 
 
 Angers, Atty.-Gen. of Quebec v. Queen 
 Ins. Co. (1 L. N. 3) 7 R. L. 545 ; 21 L. 
 C. J. 77. 
 
 Atkinson v. Usbome. 
 
 Bank of British North America v. Cuvillier 
 (4 L. C. J. 241) 2 L. C. J. 154. 
 
 Bank of Montreal v. Simson (5 L. C. J 
 ley) 10 L. C. R. 225). 
 
 Bank of Toronto v. European Assur. Soc. 
 
 (14 L. C. J. 186) 13 L. C. J. 63. 
 Bank of Upper Canada v. Bradshaw. 
 
 Banque d'Hochelaga v. Murray. 
 
 Banque Jacques Cartier v. Banque d'Epar- 
 gne de Montreal (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 64). 
 
 Bartley v. Bartley. -! 
 
 Beaudry v. Mayor of Montreal. 
 
 Bedard, m re. 
 
 Bell V. Corporation of Quebec, 2 Q. L. R. 
 
 30.'} 
 Belleville v. Doucet (1 Q. L. R. 250). 
 
 Bellingham v. Freer. 
 
 Boston V. Lelievre (14 L. C. R. 457). 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 10 App. Cas. 653 ; 54 L. 
 
 J. 3» ; .54 L. T. 138. 
 13App. Cas. 780;.57L. 
 
 J. 104 ; 59 L. T. 674 ; 
 
 15 Q. L. R. 18 ; 32 L. 
 
 C. J. 278. 
 12 App. Cas. 101; 56 L. 
 
 J. 6 : 56 L. T. 30. 
 3 L. N. 308. 
 
 3 App. Cas. lOJH) ; 38 L. 
 T. 897; 22 L. C.J. 307. 
 
 Wheeler P. C. Law 34. 
 
 Result or Appeal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to ap|)eal refused 
 by Court of Queen's 
 Bench. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed . 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 14Moo. P. C. 187;4L. 
 
 T. 1.59. 
 14 Moo. P. C. 417 ; 5 L. 
 
 T. 70 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 
 
 246 ; 6 L. C. J. 1 ; 
 
 11 L. C. R. 377. 
 ,7 R. L. .57. 
 
 |L. R. 1. P. C. 479; 4. 
 
 Moo. N. S. 406. 
 15App. Cas.414;59L. 
 
 J. 102;63L. T. 63. 
 13 App. Cas. Ill ; 57 L. Judgment reversed. 
 
 J. 42. I 
 
 Ramsay's App. Cas. 56. iLeave to appeal granted 
 I byCt. of Qtieen's Bench. 
 Wheeler's P. C. Law 74. Judgment affirmed. 
 11 Moo. P. C. 399; 6 W.l Judgment reversed. 
 
 R. 346. 
 7 Moo. P. C. 23. Precedence refused to 
 
 jjetitioner by Court of 
 Queen's Bench granted 
 by Pr. Cfiun. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 5 App. Cas. 84 ; 49 L. 
 
 J. 1 ; 41 L. T. 451. 
 1 Q. L. R. 283. 
 
 1 Moo. P. C. 333. 
 
 L. R. 3 P. C. 157; 6 Moo. 
 N.S. 427; 39 L.J. 17; 
 L. T. 735 ; 18 W. R. 
 4.V8. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 Judgement affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
42 Canea in the Coiirtn of Lower Gtinadn and Quebec 
 
 Cahr. 
 
 11 
 
 h. 
 
 t 
 I 
 
 Jlij 1: 
 
 BoHwell V. Kilborn 
 BoHwell V. Kilbora 
 Boawell v. Kilburn 
 
 :} 
 
 BrewHter v. Lamb. 
 
 Brook V. Blonmfield (0 R. L. 633). 
 
 Brown v. Cure, ^tc, (Ih Notre Dame de 
 Montreal (17 L. C. J. 8{»). 
 
 Brown v. Gugy (11 L. C. R. 401). 
 
 Brown v. Mayor of Montreal (18 L. C. J. 
 
 146) 16 L. C. J. 1 : 4 R. L. 7. 
 Brownings v. Provincial Ins. Co. 
 
 Bryant v. Banque de People. "I Q. R. 1 S. 
 Bryant v. Quebec Bank. J C. 53. 
 
 Buntin v. Hibbard (1 L. C. L. J. 34). 
 
 Burstall v. Baptist. 
 
 Cantin v. Hochelaga Bank (32 L. C. J. 22). 
 
 Rkpout on Appkal. 
 
 12 Moo. P. C. 467. 
 
 13 Moo. P. C. 47«. 
 ISMoo. P.C. 30i);6L. 
 
 T. 79; 8.Tur.N. 8.448; 
 10 W. R. 517 ; « L. C. 
 J.H)H;12L.O.R.161. 
 3 L. N. 76. 
 
 RamHay'u A pp. Cas. 54. 
 
 Rkhult ok Api'kal. 
 
 Leave to ap|>eal granted. 
 Further Hecurity ordered. 
 Judgment reverned, and 
 new trial ordere<l. 
 
 Leave to ajipeal granted 
 by Ct. of Queen 'k Bench. 
 
 Leave toai>j>eal refuHe<l by 
 Courtof Queen 'h Bench. 
 
 Judgment rever8ed. 
 
 L. R.GP.C. 167;41L. 
 
 J. 1;31L. T. 656;23 
 
 W. R. 184; 20 L. C. 
 
 J 22H. 
 2 Moo. N. S. 341 ; 10 L. 
 
 T. 45; 10 Jur. N. 8. 
 
 525; 12 W. R. 493; 
 
 14 L. C. R. 213. 
 2App. Cm. 168; 35 L. 
 
 T. 870. 
 L. R. 5P. C.263;28L. 
 
 T. 853 ; 21 W. R. 587. 
 [189.3] A. C. 170; 9 Judgment attiniied. 
 
 TimeH L. R. 322. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 1 L. 0. L. J. 60. 
 21 W. R. 485. 
 10 Can. Gaz. 586. 
 R. L. 47. 
 
 Leave to apiieal granted 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Chapman v. Lancashire Assur. Co., 13 L. 
 C. J. »;. I 
 
 Chaudiere Gold Mining Co. v. Desbaratn L. R. 5 P. C. 277 ; 42 L. 
 (15 L. C. J. 44) 13 L. C. J. 182. i J. 73 ; 29 L. T. 377 ; 
 
 21 VV. R. 935 ; 17 L. 
 
 C.J.275;4R. L.645. 
 
 Chevrotiiro v. City of Montreal (6 L. N.il2 App. Ca8.149 ; 56L. 
 
 348). J. 1 ; 56 L. T. 3. 
 
 ConnecticutFirelns. Co. v.Kavanagh(M.|[1892] A. C. 473 ; 8 
 
 L. R. 7 Q. B. 323) M. L. R. 5 S. C. 2(52). j Times L. R 752. 
 Cure de Vercheres v. Corporation of Ver- L. R. 6 P. C. XiO ; 44 L. 
 " J. 34; 32L. T. 178; 
 
 23 W. R. 712 ; 19 L. 
 C. J. 141. 
 5 App. Cas. 409 ; 42 L. .Judgment affirmed 
 
 chores (4 R. L. 87). 
 Cushing V. Dupuy (22 L. C. J. 201). 
 
 Cuvillier v. Aylwin. 
 
 Dallimore v. Brooke. 
 
 Dansereau, Ex parte (19 L. C. J. 210). 
 
 Darling v. Templeton (19 L. C. J. 85). 
 
 DeGaspe v. Bessener. 
 
 Dobie V. Temmralitiea Boanl (3 L. N. 244, 
 250) 2 L. N. 277 ; 23 L. C. J. 71. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 T. 445; 3L. N. 171;! 
 
 24 L. C. J. 151. I 
 
 2 Knapp 72 ; Stu. L. C. Xeave to appeal refused. 
 
 R. 627. I 
 
 Ramsay's App. Cas. 54. jLeave to appeal granted 
 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Ramsay's App. Cas. 55. 
 19 L. C. J. 105. 
 
 4 App. Cas. 135 ; 48 L. 
 
 J. 1 ; 39 L. T. .5.50. 
 7 App. Cas, 136 ; 51 L. 
 
 J, 46 ; 46 L. T. 1 ; 26 
 
 L. C. J. 170. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Leava to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Q. B. judg- 
 ment not being final. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
Carried to the Privy Council. 
 
 48 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Kkpokt on Api'Eau Rkhclt or Appeal. 
 
 ied. 
 
 Dunegani v. Doneguni Stu. L. C. R. 4({0. 
 
 Dorion V. St. Snlpice. 
 
 Dufaux V. Hene (17 L. C. R. 24G). 
 
 Durooher v. Beaubien. 
 
 Eliza Keith, The (Cook V. A. R. 107). 
 
 Ennatinger v. Uiigy. 
 
 Evanturel v. Evanturel, 14 L. C. R. 161. 
 
 Evanturel t. Evanturel (16 L. C. J. 258) 
 10 L. C. R. 353. 
 
 Eraser v. Abbott, 15 L. C. J. 147. 
 
 Frechette v. Cc-mpagine Manufacturiere 
 de St. Hyacinthe (5 L. N. 187 ; 1 Dor. 
 y. B. 378). 
 
 Gibb V. Beacon Fire & Life Ins. Co. 10 L. 
 O. R. 40i 
 
 Gilmour v, ParadJH (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 449; 
 31 L. C. J. 232). 
 
 (voldriag v. Banqtie d'Hochelaga (2 L. N. 
 
 230). 
 Grant v. Etna Ins. Co. (5 L. C. J. 285 ; 
 
 11 L. C. R. 330) 11 L. C. R. 128. 
 
 Gravel v. Martin (Ramsay's App. Cas. 
 
 285). 
 Gugy V. Brown. 
 
 Herrick v. Sixby (8 L. C. J. 324). 
 
 Hibernian, The (2 Stu. V. A. 148). 
 
 Hutchinson v. Gillespie. 
 
 Hutchinson v. Gillespie. 
 
 Jette V, McNaughton (20 L. C. J. 255) 
 19 L. C. J. J.53. 
 
 3KnappG3:Stu. L. C. 
 
 K.005. 
 5 App. Cas. .S02 ; 49 L. 
 
 J. 32 ; 42 L. T. 132. 
 L. R. 4 P. C. 468; 9 
 
 Mo»i. N.S.281;42L. 
 
 J. 1 ; 21 W. R. 313 : 
 
 17 L. CI. 147. 
 Stu. L. C. R. 307. 
 
 Wheeler P. C. Law 52. 
 
 5 Moo. P. C. 1. 
 
 L. R. 2 P. C. 462; 6 
 
 Moo. N. S. 75 ; 38 L. 
 
 J. 41 ; 21 L. T. 4 ; 17 
 
 W. R. 541 ; 1 Q. L. 
 
 R. 144. 
 L. R. 6 P. C. 1 ; 43 L. 
 
 J. 58 ; 31 L. T. 105 ; 
 
 23 W. R. 32 ; 1 Q. L. 
 
 R. 74 ; 5 R. L. 60(i 
 L. R. 6 P. C. 96 ; 41 L. 
 
 J. 26 ; 31 L. T. h'.Hi ; 
 
 23 W. R. 422 ; 20 L. 
 
 C.J.1«7;6R. L. .365. 
 9 App. Cas. 170; 53 L. 
 
 J. 20 ; 50 L. T. 62 ; 
 
 28 L. C. J. 202. 
 
 1 Moo. N. S. 73 ; 7 L. 
 T. 574 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 
 185 ; 11 W. R. 194. 
 
 14 App. Cas. 645; 59 L. 
 J. 38 ; 61 L. T. 442 
 suh jiowt. Gilmour v. 
 Mauroit, 33 L. C. J. 
 
 2:n. 
 
 5 App. Cas. 371 ; 49 L. 
 J. 82. 
 
 15 Moo. P. C. 516 : 6 L. 
 T. 735 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 
 705 ; 10 VV, R. 772. 
 
 22 L. C. J. 272 ; Ram- 
 say's App. Cas. 950. 
 
 L. R. 1 P. C. 411 ; 4 
 Mot). N. S. 315;30L. 
 J. :« ; 15 W. R. 721 ; 
 11 L. C. .1. 141 ; 14 L. 
 C. R. 213. 
 
 L. R. 1 P. C. 430; 4 
 Moo. N. S. 849 ; 11 
 L. C. J. 129. 
 
 L.R. 4P. C.511;27L. 
 T.725;1Q.L.R. 319. 
 
 2 Moo. P. C. 243. 
 
 4 Moo. P. C. 378. 
 21 L. C. J. 192. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, 
 •fudgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reverved. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Order for leavt to apiieal 
 
 rescinded. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 .Judgment affiiuied. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Reference to take 
 accounts ordered. 
 Commission refused. 
 
 Security on appeal 
 proved by Ct, 
 
 peal ap- 
 of Q. B. 
 
1 
 
 w 
 
 44 Ca8e< in Is. i Courts of L&icer Canada and Quebec 
 
 » . I 
 
 n 
 
 ??i 
 
 4 i 
 
 m 
 
 q 
 
 Case. 
 
 Repokt OS Appeal. 
 
 Johnson v. Connolly. 
 Jon«s V. Lemoine. 
 
 16 L. C. J. 100. 
 
 2 L. C. L. 4. 161 : 17 L. 
 C. K. 377. 
 
 Kershaw v. Kirkpatrick. 
 
 King V. Pinsonneault. 
 
 King V. Tunstall, 14 L. C. J, 197. 
 
 Labrador Co. v. The Queen. 
 
 Jones V. atanstead, etc. Ry. Co., 17 L. C. L. R. 4 P.C.H*; 8Moo. 
 R. 81. N. «L 312: « L. J. 
 
 1!» ; 26 L. T. 4.J6 ; 20 
 W. R.417; 16 L. C. 
 J. 157. 
 3 ApiiL Ca*. 343 ; 22 L. 
 : C..F. 92. 
 
 Kierkowski v. Dorion (2 L. C. L. J. «»). L. II. 2 P. C. 2!«1 ; ."i 
 
 MfXK X. a. 3l»7 : :«< 
 L J. 12: 30 L. T. 
 170 ; 14 L C.J. 29. 
 L.R.6P.C. 24.'»:44L. 
 J. 42 : 32 L. T. 174 ; 
 33 \V. R. 576; 22 L. 
 C. J. .=». 
 L. R.6P. C. .15:31 L. 
 T. .t64:23W. R.36.=>; 
 2»)L^C. J.49:6R.L. 
 35!*. 
 [1S981 A. C. 104 ; 16 L. 
 X. 67. 
 
 Lacroix v. Moreau (1 L. C. L. J. ^i ; 15 L. j 16 L. C. R. WO. 
 C. R. 485). 
 
 Lake St^ Clair V. Underwriters (Cook. \. 2 AffpCa».3^ tvl rwm 
 
 I WiLiOD T. Ca>iada 
 I Shippn^Co.:36L.T. 
 i l.TO . 3 A*j«. X. S. 361. 
 
 A. Rep. 43). 
 Lambkin v. South-Eastern Ry. Co. 
 
 L. C. J. 21. 
 
 Lareau v. Dunn (7 L. N. 218). 
 Leclerc v. Beaudry, 10 L. C. J. 20. 
 
 1 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 New secunty on appeal 
 
 ordered. 
 Execution refused where 
 
 appeal to Pr. Coun, had 
 
 bwjn lodged. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 ■Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal from 
 interlocutory judgment 
 refused by Ct. of Q. B. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Sitecial leave granted by 
 
 Privy Council. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 21 L. C. J. 325; 1 L. 
 
 X. .». 
 5 App. Cm. 3.52 : 28 W. 
 
 R. .«tf7 : 3 L. X. 162. 
 57L. J. 10(»:32LlC. J. 
 
 227. 
 L. R. -> P. C. 362 ; 29 L. ! Judgment reversed 
 
 T. 410:21W. R.4S7;i 
 
 17L.C.J. 17S; 5R. 
 
 L.626. 
 Leduc V. Provincial Ins. Co. 14 L. C. J. L. R. 6P.C. 224: 43L. 
 
 273. 
 
 Lemoine v. Lionais, 2 L. C. L. J. 163. 
 Logan V. Le Mesurier. 
 
 J. 49 : 31 L. T. 142 ; 
 22 W. R.a29; 19 L. 
 C. J. JSl. 
 6 R. L. 1:5*. 
 
 6 MooL P. C. 116. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Loranger, Atty.-Gen. v. Colonial Building 9 Aj)|ni'a*>. I.i7: .'iSL.J.i.Tudgment reversed. 
 Assoc. 27;4ULT.7«»:7L. 
 
 X.10:2rL.C.J.295.j 
 Lord v. Elliott (27 L. C. J. 30 ; 5 L. N. 124 ; 52 L. J. 23 : «> L. T. Judgment reversed. 
 2 Dor. Q. B. ^37). .>42; Ram<ir'e App.i 
 
 Ci«. liCC. I 
 
 L'Union St. Jacmies de Montreal v. L. R. 6 P. C. 31 ; 31 L. Judgment reversed. 
 Belisle, 15 L. C. J. 212. 1 T. Ill : 22 W. R. 933-, 
 
 I 20L.C. 4.29. 
 
Carried to the Privy Council. 
 
 45 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Lussier v. Hochelaga 
 
 Macfarlane v. Leclaire. 
 
 Malo V. Migneault (14 L. C. J. 141). 
 
 Marois, in re. 
 
 Martin v. Lee (9 L. C. R. 376). 
 
 Alei'.dejohn v. Atty.-Gen. of Quebec. 
 
 Mid(lleiniK8 v. Les Seurs Dames Hospit 
 allie de St. Joseph (1 L. N. 51). 
 
 Miner v. Gilmour. 
 
 Molson V. Carter (3 L. N. 258 ; 25 L. C. J, 
 65). 
 
 Molson V. Carter (26 L. C. J. 150) 
 (6L. N. 372; 3 Dor. Q ' 
 
 Rkpokt on Appeal. Rksult of Appeal. 
 
 r. l.W). ( 
 B. 279). j 
 
 Aluntreal, City of, v. Devlin. 
 
 Montreal, Mayor, etc., of, v. Drummond 
 (18 L. C. J. 225). 
 
 Montreal. Mayor of, v. Hubert. 
 
 Montreal Assur. Co. v. McGiIlivray. 
 (2 L. C. J. 221 ; 8 L, C. R. 401). 
 
 Montreal, etc., Ry. Co. v. Bourgoin (23 L. 
 C. J. 96), 
 
 Monro v. Harris. 
 
 Morrison v. City of Montreal. 
 Motz V. Mor«au (7 L. C. R. 147). 
 
 ( 
 
 3 L. N. 209. 
 
 15Moo.P.C.181;8.Tur. 
 N. S. 267 ; 6 L. C. J. 
 370. 
 
 1 Moo. N. S. 1 ; 12 L. 
 C. li H74. 
 
 Jm R. 4 V. C. 123; 8 
 
 Moo. N. S. 347 ; 41 L. 
 
 J. 11 : 26 L. T. 329 ; 
 
 20 W. R. 527 ; 16 L. 
 
 C..T.288;3R.L.606. 
 15 Moo. P. C. 189; 8 
 
 Jur. N.S.268;10\V. 
 
 R. 326. 
 14 M(X). P. C. 142 ; 4 L. 
 
 T. 657 ; 9 W. R. 522 ; 
 
 14 L. C. R. 84. 
 
 2 Knapp. 328 ; Stu. L. 
 C. R. 581. 
 
 3 App. Cas. 1102 ; 47 L. 
 J.i!9; 38 L. T. 899; 
 22 L. C. J. 149. 
 
 12 Moo. P. C. 131 : 7 W. 
 
 R.328;9L.C.R.115. 
 Ramfay's App. Cas. 
 
 1014. 
 
 8 App. Cas. 530 ; 52 L. 
 
 J. 46 ; 49 L. T. 83. 
 10 App. Cas. 664. 
 1 L. N. 151 ; 22 L. C. 
 
 J. 136. 
 
 1 App. Cas. 384 ; 45 L. 
 
 J. 33; 35 L. T. 106; 
 
 22 L. C J. 1. 
 21 L. C. .). C5. 
 
 13 Moo. P. C. 87 ; 8 W. 
 
 R.165;9L.C.R.488. 
 13Moo. P.C. 125;9VV. 
 
 R. 370. 
 5 App. Cas. 381 : 49 L. 
 
 J. (» ; 42 L. T. 414 ; 
 
 3 L. N. 185 ; 24 L. C. 
 
 J. 193. 
 1 App. Cas. 318 ; 45 L. 
 
 J. 55; 34 L. T. 519-, 
 
 24 W. R. 887 ; 2 Q. L. 
 
 R. 147 ; 3 Asp. N. S. 
 
 173. 
 3 App. Cas. 148 ; 47 L. 
 
 J. 21. 
 13Moo. P. C. 376;8W. 
 
 R.395;10L.C.R. 84. 
 13Moo. P.C.396;9W. 
 
 R. <•?!. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Court of Queen's 
 Bench. 
 
 Motion to rescind orderfor 
 leave to api)eal refused. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 S(>ecial leave to appeal 
 granted. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Court of Queen's 
 Bench. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirrii«)d. 
 Leave to api^eal granted 
 
 by Court of Queen's 
 
 Bench. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Leave to appeal granted 
 by Court of Queen's 
 Bench after expiry of 
 time to apply. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Venire de novo ordered. 
 
 Judgment reversed 
 in part. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 A()plicatiun for re-hear- 
 ing refused. 
 
46 
 
 Cases in the Courts of Lower Canada ind Quebec 
 
 m 
 
 
 
 ■I.' i 
 
 I 
 
 Case. 
 
 Muir V. Muir (15 L. C. J. 309). 
 
 MuUin V. Ai-chambault (3 L. C. L. t/. 90). 
 
 MacLaren v. Murphy. \ 
 Connolly v. McLaren. / 
 
 McCarthy v. Judah. 
 
 McConnell v. Murphy. 
 
 McDonald v. July (2 L. N. 2 ; 10 R. L. 
 
 391) 1 L. N. 446. 
 McDonald v. Lambe (9 L. C. J. 281). 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 ( 
 
 McDougall V. McGreevy (14 Q. L. R. 30). 
 
 McGreevy v. Russell (14 R. L. 348). 
 McKay v. Rutherford. 
 McLeod V. Masham. 
 
 Nault V. Price (11 Q, L. R. 309 ; 4 Dor. q. 
 
 B. 348). 
 Norma, The (1 O L. R. 211). 
 
 Normanton, The (Cook V. A. Rep. 65; 
 
 2 Q. L. R. i;i4). 
 North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. 
 
 Lambe (M. L. R. 1 Q. B. 122) ; M. L. 
 
 R. 1 S. C. 32. 
 
 Nye V. McDonald, 2 L. C. J. 159. 
 
 *0'Farrell v. Brassard (1 L. N. 25) 3 Q. L. 
 R. 33). 
 
 Pacaud v. Gagne (17 L. C. R. 357). 
 
 Pacaud v. Queen Ins. Co. (21 L. C. J. 111). 
 Pacaud v. Riukaby (1 Q. L. R. 245). 
 Pacaud v. Roy. 
 Panet v. Hamel. 
 
 Pollok V. Bradbury. 
 
 L. R. 5 P.O. 66; 43 L. 
 
 J. 7 ; 30 L. T. 205 ; 
 
 22 W. R. 268 ; 18 L 
 
 C. .7. 96. 
 3 L. C. L. J. 117. 
 
 L. R. 4 P. C. 262; 8 Moo. 
 N. S. 1;21W. R.8. 
 
 12 Moo. P. C. 47. 
 
 L. R. 5P.C. 203;28L. 
 
 T. 713. 
 2 L. N. 104. 
 
 L. R. 1 P. C. 539; 4 
 Moo. N. S. 486; 36 
 L. J, 70 : 11 L. C. J. 
 ;«5 : 17 L. C. R. 293 ; 
 4 L. C. L. J. 8. 
 
 11 Can. Gaz.394. 
 
 13 Can. Gaz. 396. 
 56 L. T. 501. 
 
 6 Moo. P. C. 413. 
 
 4 L. N. 99. 
 
 12App.Cas.llO;56L. 
 J.29;13Q.L.R.286. 
 3 Asp. N. S. 272. 
 
 Cook, V. A. Rep. 75n. 
 
 12App. Cas. 575:56L. 
 
 J. 87 ; 57 L. T. 377 ; 
 
 13Q. L.R.196;32L. 
 
 C.J. Igiib nom. Bank 
 
 of Tore;.! to V. Lambe. 
 L. R. 3 P. C. 331 ; 7 
 
 Moo. N.S. 134;39L. 
 
 J. 34 ; 23 L. T. 220 ; 
 
 18 W. R. 1075. 
 IL. N. 115; 4Q. L. R. 
 
 214. 
 
 17 L. C. R. 375. 
 
 2 Steph. Dig. 70. 
 Ramsay's App. Cas. 54. 
 16 L. C. R. 398. 
 
 2 App. Cas. 121 ; 46 L. 
 
 J. 5 ; 35 L. T. 741 ; 
 
 3 Q. L. R. 173. 
 8 Moo. P. C. 227. 
 
 Result op Appeal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Q. B. ; appli- 
 cation too late. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Leave to apiieal granted 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench . 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Motion to rescind order 
 granting leave to ap- 
 peal refused. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal granted, 
 but appeal abandoned. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Leave to appeal in case 
 of mio warranto refused 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 byCt. of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Leave to ap{)eal granted 
 byCt. of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 y'i 
 
Carded to the Privy Council. 
 
 47 
 
 Cask 
 
 Prentice v. McDougall (28 L. C. J. 169 ; 
 
 7 L. N. 162 ; 4 Dor. 6. B. 91). 
 Prevost V. Cnmpagnie de Fives Lille (4 
 
 Dor. Q. B. 33). 
 
 Quebec, The (Cook V. A. Rep. 32). 
 
 Quebec & Richmond Ry. Co. v. Quinn 
 
 (6 L. C. R. 129, 350). 
 Quebec Fire Ins. Co. v. Anderson. / 
 
 Quebec Fire Ins. Co. v. St. Louis. 
 
 Quebec Marine Ins. Co. v. Commercial 
 Bank of Canada (13 L. C. J. 267). 
 
 Queen, The, v. Coote. 
 
 Queen, The, v. Ramsay (11 L. C. J. 152). 
 
 Redfield v. Corporation of Wickham. 
 
 Reg. V. Exr^<vnge Bank of Canada (M. L. 
 R. 1 Q. B. 302) 29 L. C. J. 117. 
 
 Renaud v, Tourangeau (13 L. C. R. 278). 
 
 Renny v. Moat (2 L. N. 97). 
 
 Reynar v. Porteous (11 Q. L. R. 297). 
 
 Rogerson v. Reid. 
 
 Rolland v. Caasidy (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 238) 
 7 L. N. 70. 
 
 Ryland v. DeLiale (12 L. C. J. 29). 
 
 Savageau v. Gauthier (1 Rev. Crit. 248). 
 
 Scott V. Pacquet (4 L. C. J. 149). 
 
 Senecal v. Hatton (M. L. R. 1 Q. B. 112) 
 6 L. N. 220. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Result of Appeal. 
 
 8 L. N. 153 ; Ramsay's 
 App. Cas. 996. 
 
 11 App. Cas. 643 ; 54 L, 
 J. 34 ; 54 L. T. 97 ; 
 8 L. N. 297 ; 29 L. C. 
 J. 268. 
 
 Wheeler P. C. Law 18. 
 
 12 Moo. P. C. 232. 
 
 7 L. C. J. 150. 
 
 13 Moo. P. C. 477. 
 
 7 Moo. P. C. 286. 
 
 L. R. 3 P. C. 234 ; 7 
 
 Moo. N. S. 1 ; 39 L. 
 
 J. .53 ; 22 L. T. 559 ; 
 
 18 W. R. 769. 
 L. R. 4 P. C. 599; 9 
 
 Moo. N. S. 4()3; 42 
 
 L. J. 45; 29 L. T. 
 
 Ill; 18L. C. J. 103. 
 L R. 3 P. C. 427; 7 
 
 Moo. N. S. 263 ; 15 
 
 L. C. J. 17. 
 13App. Cas. 467;57L. 
 
 J. 94 ; 58 L. T. 455 ; 
 
 4 Times L. R. 317 ; 11 
 
 L. N. 113; 33 L. C. 
 
 J. 170. 
 11 App. Cas. 157 ; 55 L. 
 
 J. 5 ; 54 L. T. 802 ; 
 
 2 Times L. R. 342; 
 
 30 L. C. J. 194. 
 L. R. 2P. C. 4; 5Moo. 
 
 N. S. 5; 37 L. J. 1; 
 
 17 L. C. R. 451. 
 4 L. N. 195. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 •Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to ap^al granted. 
 Order granting leave 
 
 rescinded. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 .Judgment affirmed. 
 
 13App. Cas. 120;57L. 
 
 J. 28 ; 57 L. T. 891 ; 
 
 32 L. C. J. 55. 
 1 Knapp 362 ; Stu. L. 
 
 C. R. 412. 
 13 A]ip. Cas. 770 ; 57 L. 
 
 J. 99 ; 59 L. T. 873 ;l 
 
 32 L. C. J. 169. j 
 
 L. R. 3 P. C. 17 ; 6 Moo. 'Judgment reversed 
 
 N. S. 225 ; 38 L. J. 
 
 67; 21 L. T. 325; 14 
 
 L. C. J. 12. 
 L.R. 5P.C. 494;22W. 
 
 R.667;5R. L. 602. 
 
 L. R. 1 P. C. .5.-)2; 4 
 Moo. N. S. 505 ;:36 
 L. J. a5. 
 
 8 Can. Gaz. TA. 
 
 Appeal disniissedj unless 
 petitionforspecial leave 
 Icxlged before a date 
 named, case not lieing 
 appealable as of right. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
48 Cases in Lower Can. and Que. carried to Privy Council. 
 
 Case. 
 
 'A 
 
 III, 
 
 Stnecal v. Panze (M. L. R. 5 Q. B. 461) 
 
 M. L. R. 1 S. C. 405 ; 7 L. N. 30. 
 Shaw V. Jeffrey. 
 
 Simard v. Townsenfl. 
 
 Singleton v. Knight (14 Q. L. R. 39) ; 13 
 Q. L. R. 70. 
 
 Smith V. Brown. 
 
 Smith V. St. Lawrence Tow Boat Co. 
 
 Stanton v. Home Fire Ins. Co. (2 L. N. 
 
 238) ; 21 L. C. J. 211. 
 Stephens v. Mayor of Montreal. 
 
 St. Louis V. St. Louis (Stu. L. C. R. 575). ( 
 
 Rkport on Appeal. Result op Appeal. 
 
 \ 
 
 Symes v. Cuvillier (1 L. N. 302). 
 Theberge v. Landry. 
 
 Tobin V. Murison. 
 
 Torrance v. Bank of British North America 
 (15 L. C. J. 169) ; 12 L. C. J. 325, 
 
 Trigge v. Lavallee. 
 
 Voyer v. Richer, 13 L. C. J. 213. 
 Wardle v. Bethune (12 L. C. J. 321). 
 
 Whitfield V. Macdonald (26 L. C. J. 69 ; 2 
 Dor. Q. B. 157). 
 
 Whyte V. Home Ins. Co. 
 
 Whyte V. Western Assurance Co. 
 Young V. Dental Association (2 L. N. 292). 
 
 Young V. Lambert. 
 
 14 App. Cas. 637. 
 
 13Moo. P. C.432; 3L. 
 T. 1 ; 10 L. C. R. 340. 
 6 L. C. R. 147. 
 
 13 Anp. Cas. 788 ; 57 L. 
 
 J. i06; 59L. T. 738; 
 
 14 Q. L. R. 257. 
 2 Moo. P. C. 35. 
 
 L. R. .S P. C. 308 ; 28 L. 
 T. 885 ; 21 W. R. 569. 
 
 2 L. N. 314. 
 
 3 App. Cas. 605 ; 47 L. 
 J. 67. 
 
 1 Moo. P. C. 143. 
 
 3 Moo. P. C. 398. 
 5 App. Cas. 138 ; 49 L. 
 J. 54 ; 42 L. T. 198. 
 
 2 App. Cas. 102 ; 46 L. 
 .1.1; 35L.T.640;25 
 W. R. 216 ; 3 Q. L 
 R. 202. 
 
 5 Moo. P. C. 110. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 I Leave to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused 
 by Ct. of Queen's Bench. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Motion to dismiss appeal 
 
 for delay refused. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 Judgment affinned as to 
 account 3tate<l. Venire 
 de Novo ordered as to 
 damages. 
 L. R. 5 P. C. 246 ; 29 L. Judgment affirmed. 
 
 T. 109;21W. R.529; 
 
 17 L. C. J. 185. 
 15 Moo. P. C. 27C ; 8 L. 
 
 T. 154 : 9 Jur. N. S. 
 
 261 ; 11 W. R. 404 ; 7 
 
 L. C. J. 85 ; 13 L. C. 
 
 R. 132. 
 L. R. 5 P. C. 461 ; 30 L. 
 
 T.506;22W. R.849; 
 
 5 R. L. 591. 
 L. R. 4P.C.33;8Moo, 
 
 N.S. 223; 41L..L1; 
 
 26L.T. 81; 20W. R 
 
 374 ; 16 L. C. J. 85. 
 8 App. Cas. 733 ; 52 L. 
 
 J. 70 ; 49 L. T. 446 ; 
 
 32W. R.730;6L.N. 
 
 278 ; 27 L. C. J. 165. 
 19L. C. J.196. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 .Tudgiiii-nt atllimed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 22 L. C.J. 215; 7R.L. 
 
 106. 
 2 L. N. 294. 
 
 L. R 3 P. C. 142 ; 6 
 
 Moo. N.S. 406; 39 L. 
 J. 21 ; 22 L. T. twi> ; 
 18 W. R. 197. 
 
 Motion to have appeal de- 
 clared deserted refused 
 byCt.of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Leave to appeal from 
 Courtof Review to Privy 
 Council refused by Court 
 of Queen's Bench. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
[49] 
 
 CASES IN THE QUEBEC COURTS CARRIED TO 
 THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Abbott V. Macdonald, 21 L. C. J. 311. 
 
 Accident Ins. Co. v. Young (M. L. R. 
 
 7 Q. B. 447) 6 S. C. 3. 
 ^tna Life Ins. Co. v. Brodie (20 L. C. J. 
 
 286). I 
 
 Allen V. Hanson (16 Q. L. R. 79). 18 S. C. R. 667. 
 
 3 S. C. R. 278. 
 20 S. C. R. 280. 
 5 S. C. R. 1. 
 
 Allen V. Merchants' Marine Ins. Co. (M.115 S. C. ^. 488. 
 
 L. R. 3 Q. B. 293). ! 
 
 Anglo-Continental Guano Works Co. v. 21 S. C. R. 422. 
 
 Emerald Phosphate Co. (M. L. R. 
 
 7 Q. B. 196 ; 21 R. L. 288). 
 Ayotte V. Boucher (3 Dor. Q. B. 123). 
 
 Bain v. City of Montreal (2 Dor. Q. B. 
 
 221). 
 Banque Jacques Cartier v. Giraldi (26 L. 
 
 C. J. 110). 
 Bank of Toronto v. Perkins (1 Dor. Q. B. 
 
 357). 
 Baptist V. Baptist (Q. R. 1 Q. B. 447). 
 
 Barnard v. Molson (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 348) 
 2 S. C. 143. 
 (M. L. R. 6 Q. B. 201) 5 S. C. 374 
 
 I8)f 
 
 Beaubien v. Bematchez (14 R. L. 193). 
 
 Beausoliel v. Normand (2 Dor. Q. B. 215). 
 
 Bell V. Rickaby (3 Q. L. R. 243). 
 
 Bellechasse Election Case [Deslauriers v. 
 Larue] (5 Q. L. R. 191 ; 6 Q. L. R. 100). 
 
 Bellemare v. Dansereau (18 R. L. 250). 
 
 9 S. C. R. 460. 
 
 8 S. C. R. 262. 
 
 9 S. C. R. 597. 
 
 8 S. C. R. 603. 
 21 S. C. R. 425. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 716. 
 18 S. C. R. 622. 
 S. 0. Dig. 433. 
 
 9 S. C. R. 711. 
 2 S. C. R. 560. 
 5 S. C. R. 91. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 180. 
 
 Benning v, Atlantic & N. W. Ry. Co, (M.120 S. C. R. 177. 
 
 L. R. 6 Q. B. 385) 5 S. C. 1.36. I 
 
 Bernier v. Treniblay (Q. R. 1 Q. B. 176) 21 S. C. R. 409. 
 
 17 Q. L. R. 185. 
 Berthier Election Case [Genereux v. Cuth- 1 
 
 bert] (6 L. N. 74). 
 Bigaouette v. North cihore Ry. Co. (19 R. 
 
 L. 488). 
 Black V. Walker (M. L. R. 1 Q. B. 214 ; I 
 
 8 L. N. 67) 6 L. N. 415. 
 
 Boulanger v. Grand Tnmk Ry. Co. (11 Q. 
 L. R. 254). 
 
 M.D.— 4 
 
 9 S. C. R. 102. 
 17 S. C. R. 363. 
 S. C. Dig. 768. 
 S. C. Dig. 733. 
 
 Result of Appeal. 
 
 Appeal from Court of 
 
 Review quashed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed.. 
 
 Appeal quashed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Mow ~!n to quash appeal 
 
 refused. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; judg- 
 ment not final. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; amount 
 not Biimcient. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment; reversed. 
 
 Judgment in 5 Q. L. R. 
 191 reversed; later judg- 
 ment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
50 
 
 Cases in the Quebec Court) 
 
 Case. 
 
 ;V 1: 
 
 Bcmrget v. Blanchard (9 Q. L. R. 262). 
 
 Boyce v. Phnenix Mutual Ins. Co. (M. L. 
 
 R. 2 (2. B. 323). 
 Brady v. Stewart (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 272). 
 
 Brassard v. Lan^irevin [Charlevoix Elec 
 tion] (2 Q. L. R. 323) 
 (9R. L.153). 
 
 { 
 
 Breakey v. Carter, 7 Q. L. R. 286. 
 Brown v. Leclore (Q. R. 1 Q. B. 234). 
 
 Brown v. Dominion Salvages & Wrecking 
 
 Co., 20 R. L. 557. 
 Brunet v. L'AsRociation Pharmaceutique 
 
 de Quebec (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 362) 1 S. 
 
 C. 485. 
 Bulmer v. Dufresne (1 L. N. 303) 21 L. C. 
 
 J. 98. 
 Cad well v. Shaw (M. L. R. 4 Q. B. 246). 
 
 Canada Investment & Agency Co. v. 
 
 McGregor (Q. R. 1 Q. B. 190 M. L. 
 
 R. 6 S. C. 196. 
 Canada Shipping Co. v. Hudon Cotton 
 
 Co. (2 Dor. Q. B. 356). 
 Canadian Bank of Commerce v. Stevenson 
 
 (Q. R. 1 Q. B. 371). 
 Carrier V. Bender (12 Q. L. R. 19). 
 
 Central Vermont Ry. Co. v. Town of St. 
 Johns (30 L. C. J. 122 ; M. L. R. 4 Q. 
 
 B. 466). 
 
 Chalifoux v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. (M. 
 
 L. R. 3 Q. B. 324) 2 S. C. 171. 
 Chamberlin v. Klock (31 L. C. J. 29). 
 
 Champoux v. Lapierre (3 L. N. 302). 
 
 Charlebois v. Charlebois [2 cases] (26 L. 
 
 C. J. 364, 376). 
 
 Cimon v. Perreault [Cliarlev(jix Election] 
 
 (10 R. L. 651). 
 Claude v. Weir (M. L. R. 4 Q. B. 197) 2 S. 
 
 C. 326. 
 Compagnie de Villas du Cap Gibraltar v. 
 
 Hughes (3 Dor. 9. B. 175). 
 Connolly v. Provincial Ins. Co. (1 L. N. 
 
 33) 3 Q. L. R. 6. 
 Cote V. Stadacona Ins. Co. (6 Q. L. R. 147) 
 
 5 Q. L. R. 133. 
 Cowen V. Evans, 21 R. L. 285. 
 
 Cross V. Windsor Hotel Co. (M. L. R. 2 Q. 
 
 B. 8 ; 4 Dor. Q. B. 280). 
 Cashing v. Ducondu (3 L. N. 350). 
 
 Report on Api'kal. 
 
 Result of Appeal. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 423. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 723. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 82. 
 
 1 S. C. R 115. 
 
 2 S. C. R. 319. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 463. 
 22 S. C. R. 53. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 203. 
 14 S. C. R. 738. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 873. 
 17 S. C. R. 357. 
 
 21 S. C. R. 499. 
 
 13S. C. R. 401. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 19. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 288 ; aflf. by 
 Pr. Coun. 14 App. 
 Cas. 5J)0. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 749. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 325. 
 S. C. Dig. 426. 
 S. C. Dig. 592. 
 5 S. C. R. 133. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 575. 
 
 11 S. C. R. 537. 
 
 5 S. C. R. 258. 
 
 6 S. C. R. 193. 
 22 S. C. R. 328. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 624. 
 
 6 S. C. R. 425 8uh nam. 
 Dupuy V. Ducondu; 
 rev. by Pr. Coun. 9 
 App. Cas. 150. 
 
 Leave to apjieal refused. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 JudgTiient affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Apiieal from judgment 
 on preliminary objec- 
 tion quashed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 .'Vpiieal quashed ; amount 
 
 not sufficient. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affinued. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed; amount 
 
 not sufficient. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirme<l. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal r(uashed ; amount 
 
 not sufficient. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
Carried to the Supreme Court of Canada. 
 
 51 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Rkport on Appkal. Result of Appbal. 
 
 )unt 
 
 bunt 
 
 but 
 ap- 
 
 Danjou v. Marquiw, 3 Q. L. R. 335. 
 
 Danserr-au v, Letoumeux (M. L. R. 1 Q. 
 B. 357 ; 4 Dor. Q. B. 220) 5 L. N. 33J>. 
 Darling v. Barsalou (I Dor. (2. B. 218). 
 
 Darling v. Brown (21 L. C. J. 92). 
 
 Daveluy v. La Scwiete Canadienne Fran- 
 fjaiwe de CouHtruction (M. L. R. 7 Q. 
 B. 417). 
 
 Davidson v. Lord (M. L. R. 1 Q. B. 445). 
 
 Dawson v. McDonald (10 R. L. 640). 
 Demers v. Duhaime (14 Q. L. R. 16). 
 Desilets v. Gingras (10 R. L. 276). 
 Dorion v. Crowley (30 L. C. J. 65). 
 
 Dorion v. Dorion (M. L. R. 1 Q. B. 483; 
 
 4 Dor. Q. B. 213). 
 
 (18 R. L. 645). 
 Dubuc V. Kidston, 7 Q. L. R. 43. 
 
 Dufresne v. Dixon (32 L. C. J. 80). 
 
 { 
 
 Dun V. Cossette (M. L. R. 5 Q. B. 42 ; 33 
 
 L. C. J. 94) 3 S. C. 345. 
 Dupras v. Lamoureux, 16 R. L. 243. 
 
 Dassault v. Belleau [Levis Election Case] 
 (10 Q. L. R. 247). 
 
 Exchange Bank v. Fletcher (M. L. R. 7 Q. 
 
 B. 11 ; 19 R. L. 377 ; 34 L. C. J. 130). 
 Exchange Bank v. La B:\nque du Peuple 
 
 (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 232) 1 S. C. 231. 
 
 Fairbanks v. Barlow (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 
 
 332). 
 Farwell v. Ontario Car Co. (M. L. R. 
 
 6 Q. B. 91) 3 S. C. 238. 
 Farwell v. Wallbridge (M. L. R. 6 Q. 
 
 B. 77). 
 Fauteaux v. Montreiil Loan & Mortgage 
 
 Co. (22 L. C. J. 282). 
 Fisk V. Stevens (3 Dor. q. B. 293 ; 6 L. N 
 
 329) 5 L. N. 79. 
 Eraser v. Jones (12 Q. L. R. 333). 
 
 Eraser v. Pouliot, 3 Q. L. R. 349. 
 
 Oilman v. Exchange Bank of Canada 
 
 (16 R. L. 663). 
 Oilman v. Gilbert (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 402 ; 
 
 32 L. C. J. 138). 
 Orange v. McLennan (3 Dor. Q. B. 212). 
 
 Grant v. Beaudry (2 Dor. Q. B. 197 ; 4 L. 
 N. 393) 2 L. N. 354. 
 
 3 S. C. R. 251. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 307. 
 9 S. C. R. 677. 
 
 I S. C. R. 360. 
 20 S. C. R. 449. 
 
 13 S. C. R. 166. 
 S. C. Dig. 586. 
 16 S. C. R. 366. 
 S. C. Dig. 212. 
 S. C. Dig. 709. 
 
 13 S. C. R. 193. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 430. 
 S. C. Dig. 779. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 596. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 222. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 531 sub nmn. 
 Brossard v. Dupras. 
 
 II S. C. R. 133. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 278. 
 S. C. Dig. 79. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 217. 
 18 S. C. R. 1. 
 
 3 S. C. R. 411. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 235; 8 L. N, 
 
 42. 
 13 S. C. R. 342. 
 
 4 S. C. R. 515. 
 17 S. C. R, 108. 
 16 S. C. R. 189. 
 9 S. C. R. 385. 
 S. C. Dig. 581. 
 
 Appeal from SujieriorCt. 
 in mandamus quashed. 
 Judgment aftirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed on 
 ground not taken bt'Iow. 
 
 Judgment reversed 
 in part. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed as to 
 
 damages. 
 J.udgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 
 Judgment affirmed, 
 by equal division. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment in both cases 
 attirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment varied. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Appeal quashed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Appeal affirmed. 
 
 i 
 
^1 
 
 62 
 
 Cases in the Quebec Courts 
 
 'I 
 
 Cask. 
 
 w, 
 
 Great North Western Telegraph Co. v 
 
 Montreal Telegraph Co. (M. L. R. 6 
 
 Q. B. 257) 6 S. C. 74 ; M L. C. J. 35. 
 Gregoire v. Gregoire (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 
 
 228 ; 4 Dor. Q. B. 308 ; 30 L. C. J. 
 
 286 ; 12 Q. L. R. 32). 
 Hagar v. Seath (M. L. R. 6 Q. B. 3»4) 
 
 6 S. C. 42(J. 
 Hall V. Mayor of Montreal (6 L. N. 155 ; 
 
 27 L. C. J. 120). 
 Hampson v. Vinelierg, (33 L. C. J. 185) ; 
 
 M. L. R. 3 S. C. 434. 
 Hannan v. Ros8 (M. L. R. 6 Q. B. 222). 
 
 2 S C 395 
 Hardy v. Filiatrault (17 R. L. 27). 
 
 Harrington v. Corse (20 L. C. J. 79). 
 
 Hart V. Joyce (8 R. L. 209). 
 
 Hathaway v. Chaplin (M. L. R. 7 Q. B. 21 S. C. R. 23. 
 
 317).' 
 Heffernan v. Walsh (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 482; 14 S. C. R. 738. 
 
 33 L. C. J. 40). 
 Holland v. Mitchell, 15 R. L. 214. 16 S. C. R. 687. 
 
 Johnston v. Ministers, etc., St. Andrew's!! S. C. R. 235. 
 Church, 18 L. C. J. 113 ; 5 R. L. 487. 
 
 Kane v. Wright (1 Dor. Q. B. 297; 4 L.!s. C. Dig. 596. 
 
 N. 15) 1 L. N. 482. i 
 
 Kerr v. Davis (M. L. R. 5 Q. B. 156). 17 S. C. R. 235. 
 
 Rrport on Appeal. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 170. 
 
 13 S. C. R, 319. 
 
 18S. C. R. 715. 
 12 S. C. R. 74. 
 19 S. C. R. 369. 
 19 S. C. R. 227. 
 1. S. C. R. 292. 
 9 S. C. R. 412. 
 1 S. C. R. 321. 
 
 Labelle v. Barbeau (33 L. C. J. 252). 
 
 16 S. C. R. 390. 
 
 Labelle v. City of Montreal (M. L. R. 7 Q. [14 S. C. R. 741 
 B. 408) 2 S. C. 56. 
 
 Lamarche v. L'Heureux (11 Q. L. R. 342) 12 S. C. R. 460. 
 13 Q. L. R. 129. 
 
 Langevin v. Les Commissioners d'Ecole 18 S. C. R. 599. 
 de St. Marc. (M. L. R. 7 Q. B. 390 ; 
 19 R. L. 301). 
 
 Langlois v. Valin [Montmorency Election] 
 (5Q. L. R. 1). 
 
 Lapierre v. L'Union St. Joseph do Mon- 
 treal (21 L. C. J. 332). 
 
 Lapierre v. Rodier (Q. R. 1 Q. B. 515). 
 
 Larin v . Chapman (1 L. N. 458). 
 Larue v. Kinghorn (Q. R. 2 Q. B. 263). 
 Larue v. Rattray (12 Q. L. R. 258). 
 Lasnier v. Collette, 5 L. N. 412. 
 Lassalle v. Bergeron (1 Dor. Q. B. 257). 
 Lefebvre v. Monette (32 L. C. J. 195). 
 
 Lefeuntun v. Verouneau (Q. R. 1 Q. B. 
 
 277). 
 
 3 S. C. R. 1. 
 
 4 S. C R. 164. 
 
 21 S. C. R. 69. 
 4 S. C. R. 349. 
 
 22 S. C. R. 347. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 102. 
 13 S. C. R. 563. 
 S. C. Dig. 495. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 387. 
 
 • 
 
 22 S. C. R. 203. 
 
 Result ov Appeal. 
 
 Judgment aiHrmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quasiied. 
 Judgment aHinned. 
 Appeal quashed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgnit'ut affirmed. 
 Appeal quashed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 J'ldgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed in 
 
 part. 
 Appeal qua.shed ; amount 
 
 riot Hufficieiit. ' 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Ajjpeal from interlocu- 
 tory judgment in man- 
 davius quashed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; amount 
 
 not sufficient. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; amount 
 
 not sufficient. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; amount 
 
 not sufficient. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
Carrii-l to ihe Sit/»reme Court of Canada. 
 
 68 
 
 I 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Rkpoht on Api'Kal. Result ok Appral. 
 
 Leger v. Fournier (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 124) 
 
 ISC '^60 
 Lionais V. Molsons Bank (26 L. C. J. 271). 
 
 Longueuil Navigation Co. v. City of Mon- 
 treal (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 172) 2 S. C. 18. 
 
 Loranger, Atty.-Gen. v. Reed (3 Dor. Q. 
 B. 33 ; 26 L. C. J. 331). 
 
 Low V. Gemley (M. L. R. 5 Q. B. 186) 
 
 4 3. C. 92. 
 Mackinnon v. Kerouack (15 R. L. 34). 
 
 Magnan v. Dugaa [Montcalm Election] 
 
 (12 R. L. 226). 
 Magog Textile & Frint Co. v. Price (12 
 
 Q. L. R. 200). 
 Magog Textile & Print Co. v. Dobell (12 
 
 Q. L. R. 204). 
 Mail Printing Co. v. Laflamme (M. L. R, 
 
 4 Q. B. U) 2 S. C. 146 ; 30 L. C. J. 87. 
 Martiiidale v. Powers (Q. R. 1 Q. B. 144). 
 
 Miller v. Coleman (2 Dor. Q. B. 33 ; 25 L. 
 
 C. J. 1%). 
 Mitchell V. Mitchell (M. L. R. 4 Q. B. 191) 
 
 3 S. C. 31 ; 31 L. C. J. 178. 
 Mitchell V. Trenholme (Q. R. 2 Q. B. 164). 
 
 Moffatt V. Buriand (4 Dor. Q. B. 59 ; 28 L. 
 
 C. J. 214). 
 Moir V. Village of Huntingdon (M. L. R. 
 
 7 Q. B. 281). 
 Molson V. Lambe (31 L. C. J. 59 : M. L. 
 
 R. 2 Q. B. 381) 1 S. C. 204. 
 Montreal, City of, v. Les Ecclesiastiques, 
 
 etc., de St. Sulpice (32 L. C. J. 13 ; M. 
 
 L. R. 4 Q. B. 1) 2 S. C. 265 ; 1 S. C. 4nO. 
 Montreal City Passenger Ry. Co. v. Parker 
 
 (7 L. N. 194). 
 Montreal Street Ry. Co. v. Ritchie (M. L. 
 
 11. 5 Q. B. 77) "3 S. C. 232. 
 Moodie v. Jones (M. L. R. 6 Q. B. 354). 
 
 Moreau v. Price (15 Q. L. R. 241). 
 
 Morgan v. Cote (3 L. N. 274). 
 
 Morris v. Connecticut ftPassumpsic Rivers 
 
 Ry. Co. (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 303). 
 Morrison v. McCuaig, 4 L. N. 151. 
 
 Morse v, Martin (28 L. C. J. 236) 5 L. N. 
 
 99. 
 MunnV. Berger (27 L. C. J. 349 ; 6 L. N. 
 
 363). 
 McArthur v. Brown (13 Q. L. R. 108). 
 
 14 S C. R. 314. 
 10 S. C. R. 526. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 566. 
 
 8 S. C. R. 408 sub nom. 
 Reed v. Mousseau ; 
 aff. by Pr. Coun. 10 
 App. Cas. 141. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 085. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 111. 
 
 9 S. C. R. 93. 
 14 S. C. R. 664. 
 
 junt 
 
 McBain v. Blachford (M. L. R. 6 Q. B. 
 273). 
 
 { 
 
 S. C. Dig. 493. 
 Not yet reported. 
 S. C. Dig. 301. 
 16 S. C. R. 722. 
 22 S. C. R. 331. 
 11 S. C. R. 76. 
 19 S. C. R. 363. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 2.53. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 399. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 731. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 622. 
 19 S. C. R. 266. 
 
 18 S. C. R.'303 sub nom. 
 Price v. Mercier. 
 
 7 S. C. R. 1. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 318. 
 S. C. Dig. 642. 
 S. C. Dig. 839. 
 10 S. C. R. 512. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 61.. 
 
 19 S. U. R. 42. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 269. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed. 
 
 Judgment reversed.* 
 
 Appeal for costs only not 
 
 entertained. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed ; leave 
 to api)eal to Pr. Coun. 
 refused. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Motion to quash appeal 
 
 refused. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 ^But see Porteous v. Reynar, 13 App. Cas. 120. 
 
1 
 
 ' '' I 
 
 %' 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 I 
 
 54 
 
 Ca«e« i>i the Quebec Courts 
 
 Cahr. 
 
 McCaffrey v. Ball, 34 L. C. J. 91. 
 
 McCorkill v. Knight (1 L. N. 42). 
 
 MoFarlane v. St. Cesaire (M. L. R, 2 Q. 
 
 B. 160). 
 McGreevy v. Boomer (OR. L. 587). 
 
 MoGreevy v. Leduc (10 Q. L. R. 188). 
 
 McGreevy v. McCarron (12 Q. R. L. 373 ; 
 
 14 R. L. 422). 
 MoLachlan v. Accident Inn. Co. (34 L. C.J. 
 
 43 ; M. L. R. B Q. B. 39) 4 S. C. 3«5. 
 McManamy v. City of Sherbrooke (M. L. 
 
 R. 6 Q. B. 409 ; 19 R. L. 423). 
 McMillan v. Hedge (M. L. R. 1 Q. B. 376; 
 
 4 Dor. Q. B. 269). 
 
 Nordheimer v. Alexander (33 L. C. J. 175; 
 
 M. L. R. 6 Q. B. 402) 3 S. C. 2SS. 
 North Shore Ry. Co. v. Beaiidct (U Q. L. 
 
 R. 239). 
 North Shore Ry. Co. v. McWillie (M. L. 
 
 R. 5 Q. B. 122 ; 34 L. C. J. 55). 
 Nortli Shore Ry. Co. v. Pion (4 Dor. Q. 
 
 B.258;12Q. L. R. 205). 
 
 O'Brifn v. Caron [Quebec County Elec- 
 tion] (15 R. L 697). 
 
 Ontario Bank v. Chaplin \M. L. R. 5 Q. 
 B. 407) 15 R. L. 435. 
 
 Ontario & Quebec Ry. Ca. v. Marcheterre, 
 17 R. L. 409. 
 
 Ottawa, County of, v. Montreal, etc., Ry. 
 Co. (M. L. R. 1 Q. B. 46 ; 28 L. C. J. 
 29) 26 L. C. .1. 148 ; 5 L. N. 132. 
 
 Owens V. Bedell (M. L. R. 7 Q. B. 395). 
 
 Petry v. La Caisse d'Economie de Notre 
 
 Dame, 16 Q. L. R. 193. 
 Pigeon V. Recorder's Court (M. L. R. 
 
 6 Q. B. 60 ; 33 L. C, J. 221). 
 Pinsonneault v. Hebert (7 L. N. 276). 
 
 Poulin V. Corporation of Quebec (2 Dor. 
 
 Q. B. 103 ; 7 Q. L. R. 337). 
 Prefontaine v. Dufresnel ir\ -o i r\ n qqa\ 
 Prefontaine v. Valle6. / ^^- ^- ^ Q' ^- ^^1 
 
 Prince v. Gagnon (2 Dor. Q. B. 74). 
 
 Quebec, City of, v. Quebec Gas Co. (17 
 
 Q. L. R. 150). 
 Quebec, City of, v. Quebec Street Ry. Co. 
 
 (13 Q. L. R. 205 ; 12 Q. L. R. 317). 
 Quebec Harbor Commissioners v. Peters 
 
 (16 Q. L. R. 129) 15 Q. L. R.277. 
 Quebec, Montmorenci & Charlevoix Ry. 
 
 Co. V. Mathieu, 15 Q. L. R. 300. 
 Quebec Warehouse Co. v. Town of Levis 
 
 (3 Dor. Q. B. 322) 9 Q. L, R 305. 
 
 Rkpokt on Appkal. Rehult op Appeal. 
 
 20 A. C. R. 319. 
 3 S. C. R. 233. 
 14 S. C. R. 738. 
 S. C. Dig. 139. 
 S. C. Dig. 801. 
 
 13 S. C R. 378. 
 18 S. C. R. 627. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 594. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 736. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 248. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 44. 
 17 S. C. R. 511. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 677; aff. by 
 Pr. Coun., 14 App. 
 Cas. 612. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 429, 434. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 152. 
 17 S. C. R. 141. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 193. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 137. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 713. 
 17 S. C. R. 495. 
 13 S. C. R. 450. 
 9 S. C. R. 185. 
 
 21 S. C. R. 607. 
 
 7 S. C. R. 386. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 230. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 164. 
 19 S. C. R. 686. 
 19 S. C. R. 426. 
 11 S. C. R. 666. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversetl. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; judg- 
 ment not final. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; amount 
 not sufficient. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal quashed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; judg- 
 ment not final. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Apiieal in case attacking^ 
 
 a by-law quashed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 
Cai'ried to the Supreme Court of CdiuuUi. 
 
 u 
 
 Cahk. 
 
 Rrpobt on Appbal. 
 
 Rai)ha»'l v. McFurlanti (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 
 
 27H). 
 Reeves v. Ueriken (2 L. N. 07). 
 
 Reg. V. Abralmiim (1 Dor. Q. B. 120 ; 24 
 
 L. C. .1. 325). 
 Hep. V. Dowiiie (M. L. R. A il B. ;W0). 
 
 Refe'. V. \rorin (10 (}. L. R. 300). 
 
 Reg, V. S<r()tt (21 L. C. J. 22.')). 
 
 18 H. C. R. 1«3. 
 
 lOS.C. R. 010j(«fc»ioOT. 
 Reeves v. Perreault. 
 (5 H. C. R. 10. 
 
 15 H. C. R. 2m. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 407. 
 
 2 d. C. R. 34!t. 
 
 RohiiiMon v. f'anadiiiii Pacific Ry. Co. (M.'14 S. C. R. 105. 
 L. R. 2 < ,». B. 25). ! 
 
 (M. L. \{. Q. ]i. IIH) 5 S. C. 225; 33 11» S. (\ R. 21>2 ; rev. 
 L. C. J. 145. ! l.y Pr. Coun. [181)2] 
 
 i A. C. 4«1. 
 Robs v. Holland (M. L. K. 2 Q. B. 310). 'l'.) S. C. R. 50(). 
 
 RntuLT or Appeal. 
 
 Ross V. RosH (7 L. N. 05) 5 L. N. 1«7. 
 (Q. R. 2 i-l B. 413) 10 L. N. 02. 
 
 Royal Institution of Learning v. Scottish 
 Union Ins. Co. (M. L. R. Q. B. 458). 
 
 Rtissell V. LafranQois (2 Dor. Q. B. 245). 
 
 Sangster v. Hood (M. L. R. 5 Q. B. 384 ; 
 
 18 R. L. 40). 
 Sch(x>I Commissioners of Ste. Victoire v. 
 
 Hus (M. L. R. 7 Q. B. 330). 
 Sohwersenski v. Vineberg (M. L. R. 7 Q. B. 
 
 137). 
 Shaw V. McKenzie (25 L.C.J. 40) 23 L. C. 
 
 J. .52; 2 L.N. 5. 
 Sheridan v. Ottawa Agricultural Ins. Co. 
 
 (2 L. N. 200). 
 Skelton v. Evans (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 325 ; 
 
 31 L. C. J. 307) 
 Soulanges Election Case [Cholette v. Bain] 
 
 (7 L. N. 220). 
 Stephens v. Chausse (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 270). 
 
 Stephens v, Gillespie (M. L. R. 3 Q. B. 167). 
 
 Ste. Anne, CorfK)ration of, v. Rebum (M. 
 
 L. R. 1 Q. B. 200 ; 4 Dor. Q. B. 192). 
 St. James v. Cori)oration of St. Gabriel (12 
 
 R. L. 15). 
 St. Louis V. Senecal (M. L. R. 5Q. B. 332; 
 
 33 L. C. J. 325). 
 
 St. Louis V. Shaw (2 Dor. Q. B. 374). 
 Sweeny v. Bank of Montreal, 5 L. N. 66. 
 
 Thibaudeau v. Benning (17 R. L. 173 ; 33 
 L. C. J. 30 ; M. L. R. 5 Q. B. 425) 
 2 S. C. 338. 
 
 Thompson v. Molson's Bank, 8 L. N. 363. 
 
 .S. C. Dig. 300. 
 
 18S.C. R. 615*w«/n(M«, 
 
 Barrington v. Scot, 
 
 Union. 
 8 S. C. R. 'Am ; leave to 
 
 appeal to Pr. Coun. 
 
 refused. 
 16 S. C. R. 723. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 477. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 243. 
 
 6 S. C. R. 181. 
 
 5 S. C. R. 157. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 637. 
 
 10 S. C. R. 652. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 379. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 709. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 92. 
 S. C. Dig. 147. 
 
 18 S. C.R. 587 »u6 7107/1. 
 
 St. Louis v. Dan- 
 
 sereau. 
 8 S. C. R. 385. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 661 ; aflf. by 
 Pr. Coun. 12 App. 
 Cas. 017. 
 
 20S. C. R 110«M6»iont. 
 Simpson v. Thibau- 
 deau. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 664. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed . 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment aflirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reverswl. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment reversal. 
 
 Judgment affinntii. 
 
 Judgment partly 
 reversefl. 
 
 Ap|)eal quashed ; judg- 
 ment not final. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Ap|K>al (|uashed ; amount 
 
 not suHicient. 
 Judgment affiiim-d. 
 
 Judgment atfinii(d. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 •Tudgment afBnned. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 'Fudgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
T 
 
 I 
 
 i 56 Caaett in the Qtiebec Courts Carried to Sit}^. Ct. of Canada. 
 
 ! 
 
 \ '' Cahk. 
 
 Rkpoht on Appeal. 
 
 Rkuhltok Appeal. 
 
 i ? Three Rivem, CoriMration <»f, v. Major 
 
 S. C. Dig. 422. 
 
 ApiNtal quashed ; case not 
 
 1 (2 Dor. Q. B. 84 ; 8 1^. L. R. 181 ; 11 R. L. 
 
 
 originating in Suiierior 
 
 1 :] 238). 
 
 
 Court. 
 
 ■}. Three RiverB, Curtmration of, v. Suite (6 
 
 11 S. C. R. 28. 
 
 Judgment afiinned. 
 
 f L. N. 331). 
 
 
 
 , ; Treaoey v. Ligget (3 Dor. Q. B. 247). 
 
 9 S. C. R. 441. 
 
 Judgment reverst d. 
 
 [ ] Veroheres, Coriioration of, v. Village of 
 ! Varennes (M. L. R. 7 Q. B. 308) 7 
 
 19 S. C. R. 305. 
 
 Appeal in action attack- 
 
 
 ing by-law quashed. 
 
 S. C. .3. 
 
 
 
 , ; Vezina v. N«w York Life Ins. Co. (3 L. N. 
 
 6 S. C. R. 30. 
 
 Judgment niverned. 
 
 322 ; 25 L. C. J. 232). 
 
 
 
 Vezina v. Queliec North Shore Turnpike 
 
 S. C. Dig. 758. 
 
 Judgment afliniied. 
 
 Road Trustees (3 Dor. Q. B. OT)). 
 
 
 
 Wadsworth v. McCortl (M. L. R. 2 Q. B. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 466 ; aff . by 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 113 ; 11 Q. L. R. 232). 
 
 Pr. Cdun. 14 App. 
 CftH. 631. 
 13 S. C. R. 207. 
 
 
 Western Assur. Co. V. Scanlan (15 R. L. 449). 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 i 1 Wheeler v. Black (M. L. R. 2Q. B. 139). 
 
 14 S. C. R. 242. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Wilson V. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (2 Dor. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 722. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Q. B. 131). 
 
 
 
 Wilson V. LacoHte (M. L. R. 6 Q. B. 316). 
 
 20 S. C. R. 218. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Wylie V. City of Montreal (M. L. R. 1 
 
 12 S. C. R. 384. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Q. B. 367 ; 4 Dor. Q. B. 245) 7 L. N. 26. 
 
 
 
 Yon V. Cassidy (33 L. C. J. 106). 
 
 18 S. C. R. 713. 
 
 Judgment alHrmed. 
 
 > Young V. Rattray (12 Q. L. R. 168 ; 8 
 L. N. 10). 
 
 S. 0. Dig. 149. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 i .. 
 
 If 
 1 
 
 \ 
 
 
 ' 
 
 11 
 
 
[57] 
 
 CASES IN THE COURTS OF NOVA SCOTIA 
 CARRIED TO THE PRIVY COUNCIL. 
 
 Cahk. 
 
 American, The (Stewart V. A. Rep. 286). 
 
 Bank of BritiHh North America v. Strung. 
 
 Cajw Breton, in re. 
 
 Chase, The (Young V. A. Rep. 113). 
 
 Cobequid Marine Ins. Co. v. Barteaux 
 
 Colonial Bank v. Exchange Bank of Yar 
 mouth (5 R. &. G. 125). 
 
 CoKsman v. British American Assur. Co. 
 
 (6 R. & G. 457). 
 Cossman v. West (16 R. & G. 461). 
 
 } 
 
 DesBarres v. Shey (2 N. S. D. 327). 
 
 Exchange Bank v. Blethen (5 R. & G. 533). 
 
 Fly, The (Stewart V. A. Rep. 171). 
 Furieuse, La (Stewart V. A. Rep. 177). 
 
 Geldert v. Municipality of Piotou (23 N. S. 
 Rep. 483. 
 
 Repokt on Appkal. 
 
 Rksclt or Appeal. 
 
 Stewart V. A. Rep. 
 'M2n. 
 
 I App. Cas. 307; 34 
 L. T. 627. 
 
 5 Moo. P. C. 259. 
 
 Young V. A. Rep. 125. 
 
 L. R. 6 P. C. 319 ; 32 
 L. T. 510 ; 23 W. R. 
 
 892. 
 
 II App. CaH. 84 ; (55 L, 
 J. 14 nub ni>m. Col, 
 Bank v. Bank of 
 Nova Scotia) 54 L.T, 
 256 ; 34 W. R. 417. 
 
 13 App. Cas. 160; 57 
 L. J. 17; 58 L.T. 122; 
 4 Times L. R. 65. 
 
 29 L. T. 592 ; 22 W. R. 
 273. 
 
 lOApp. Cas. 293; 53 L. 
 T. 537; ;i3W.R.801. 
 
 Stewart V. A. Rep. 
 
 173n. 
 Stewart V. A. Rep. 
 
 lS5n. 
 
 [1893] A.C. 524; 9 Times 
 L. R. 638. 
 
 Happy Couple, The (Stewart V. A. Rep.'Stewart V. A.Rep.76«. 
 
 65). 
 Hill V. Goodall. 
 
 Mott V. Tiockhart. 
 McLean \ . McKay. 
 
 McLeod V. McNab. 
 
 3Murd. Ei)it. 145. 
 
 8 App. Cas. 568 ; 52 L 
 
 J. 61. 
 L. R. 5 P. C. 327; 29 
 
 L. T. 352; 21 W. R 
 
 798. 
 [1891] A. C. 471 ; 60 L 
 
 J. 70 ; 65 L. T. 266. 
 
 By High Court of Admiralty. 
 
 Judgment reversed.* 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Petition against annex- 
 
 aticm refused. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment aflirmi>d. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed.* 
 Judgment affirmo<l.* 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
58 Cases in the Cts. of Nova Scotia Curried to the Pr. Conn. 
 
 Case. 
 
 McSweeney v. Wallace (2 Old. 332). 
 
 Nancy, The (Stewart V. A. Rep. 2»), 
 
 Parker v. Kenny (5 R. k G. 457). 
 
 Robertson v. Grant. 
 
 Snow V. Morton (2 N. S. D. 237). 
 
 Taylor v. Archibald (3 N. S. D. 233). 
 Thomas Allen, The, v. Gow. 
 
 Riporr ox Appeal. 
 
 L. R. 2 P. C. 180 ; 5 
 Mo»K X. S. 244 ; 37 
 L. J. 39 ; 16 W. R. 
 1088. 
 
 Stewart V. A. Rep. 38n. 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Whwlf-rP.C. Law, 293; Judgment affirmed. 
 6 Can Oaz. 174. 
 
 Wheeler P. C. Law, 14. 
 
 29L.T. 5M. 
 
 jWhelerP. C. Law48. 
 
 112 App. Cai 118; 56 
 L. T. 2*5. 
 
 Three Brothers, The (Stewart V. A. Rep. Stewart V, A Rep. 
 99). j lOOn. 
 
 United States, The (Stewart V. A. Rep. Stewart V. A. Rep. 
 116). j 122h. 
 
 Venus, The (Stewart V. A. Rep. 96). 'stewart V. A- Kep. i»7. 
 
 Judgment affimied. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 New trial ordered. 
 Judgment varied. 
 Judgment affirmed.* 
 
 Judgment reversed.* 
 
 Judgment affirmed.* 
 
 Wallace, in re (1 Old. 654). 
 
 L. R. 1 P. C. 283; 4 Judgment reversed. 
 I Moo. X. S. 140; 36 
 i L. J. 9; 15 W. R 
 .=>33. 
 
 Windsor & AnnajxJis Ry. Co. v. Western 7 App Ca*. 178 : 51 L. Judgment affinntd 
 Counties Ry. Co. (R. E. D. 383) 2 R.l J. 43; 46 L. T. 351. 
 
 & G. 280. 
 
 * By High Court of Adniiraltr. 
 
 Iff. 
 
 iv . 
 
[59] 
 
 CASES IN THE NOVA SCOTIA COUKTS CAKKIED 
 TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Almon V. Pn>vidence Washington Ins. Co. S. C Dig. 390. 
 
 (4 R. & G. 533). i 
 
 Annand v. Tupper (21 N. S. Rep. 11). 16 S. C. R. 718. 
 
 i 
 Atty.-Gen. of Canada v. Flint (3 R. & G. 10 S. C. R. 707. 
 
 Atty.-Gt-n. of Nova Scotia v. Axford (5 R. 13 S. C. R. 294. 
 & G. 107) Ru8s. Eq. D. 429. 
 
 Bailey v. Ocean Mutual Marine Ins. Co. 19 S. C. R. 153. 
 
 (22 N. S. Rep. 5). ! 
 
 Bank of LiveriKwl, in re (G R. & G. 531) 14 S. C. R. 050 sub nom 
 
 ; Mott V. Bank of 
 Nova Scotia. 
 (22 N. S. Rep. 97). 1 7 S. C. R. 707 suh nom. 
 j Forsytiie v. Bank of 
 I Neva Scotia. 
 Bank of Nova Scotia v. Smith (4 R. & G. 8 S. C. R. 558. 
 
 146). I 
 
 Beamish v. Kaulbach (3 R. & C. 427). 3 S. C. R. 704. 
 
 Boak V. Merchants' Marine Ins. Co. (1 R. 
 
 & C. 288). 
 Bowmanville Machine Co. v. Dempster (2 
 
 R. & C. 273). 
 Bradley v. McLean (2 R. & >3. 584). 
 
 Brown v. Brookfield (24 N. S. Rep. 476). 
 
 Bunker's Island, in ^e (3 K. k C. 307). 
 
 Burnham v. Davison (5 R. & G. 388). 
 
 1 S. C. R. 110. 
 
 2 S. C. R. 21. 
 2 S. C. R. 535. 
 22 S. C. R. 398 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 IJudgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal from Court of 
 Frobate quashed. 
 
 Appeal fmm order for 
 new trial qiiashed. 
 
 Judgment anirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed on 
 different grotinds. 
 3 S. C. R. 203 sub nom. 'Judgment affirmed. 
 Wilkins v. Geddes. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 840. 
 
 Butler v. Merchants' Marine Ins. Co. (5 S. C. Dig. 390. 
 R. & G. 301). 
 
 Caldwell v. Stadacona Ins. Co. (3 R. & G. 11 S. C. R. 212. 
 
 218). 
 Chesley v. Murd.Kih (L' R. & C. .321). i2 S. C. R. 48. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmetl. 
 
 Church Wartlens of Parrsboro' v. King 
 (2 R. & C. 383). 
 
 Clark V. Clark (21 N. S. Rej). 378). 
 
 2 S. C. R. 143 suh nom. Judgment reversed. 
 
 Rector, etc., of St. 
 
 George's Parish v. 
 
 King. 
 17 S. C. R. 376. 
 
 Cogswell v. Holland (21 N. S. Rep. 279) 
 
 21 N. S. Rep 155. 
 Corbett v. Anchor Marine Ins. Co. (2 R. :9 S. C. R. 73. 
 
 A (J. 375. I 
 
 Corbett v. Providence Washington Ins. ,9 S. C. R. 25H. 
 
 Co. 3 R. 4 G. 109). I 
 
 Judgment reverseil. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 420 suh nom. Judgment affirmeil. 
 Cogswell V. O'Brien, i 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
60 
 
 Cufies in the Nova Scotia Courts 
 
 I m 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Report on Appkal. 
 
 
 Cox V. Gunu ('J R. & C. 528). 
 Creighton v. Chittick (2 R. & G. 90). 
 Cummings v. Gladwin (4 R. & G. 16H). 
 Cunningham v. Collins (23 N. S. Rep. 350). 
 
 Dickie v. Woodworth [King's County 
 
 Election] (4 R. & G. 105). 
 
 (19 N. S. Ren. 96). 
 DouU V. Western Assur. Co. (6 R. & G. 
 
 478). 
 Duggan V, Duggan (22 N. S. Rep. 20). 
 
 Eisenhauer v. Nova Scotia Marine Ins. 
 
 Co. (24 N. S. Rep, 205). 
 EUh v. Bhick (19 N. S. Rep. 222). 
 
 Esson V. Wood (4 R. & G. 276). 
 
 Fairbanks v. Kuhn (2 R. & G. 147). 
 
 Fielding v. Mott (6 R. & G. 339). 
 
 Fisher v. Anderson (1 R. & G. 177). 
 
 Fitzrandolph v. Mutual Relief Soc. (21 N. 
 
 S. Rep. 274). 
 Foot V. Foot (20 N. S. Rep. 71). 
 
 Eraser v. Wallace (2 R. & C. 337). 
 
 Eraser, Simon, in re (1 R. & G. 354). 
 
 Fuller V. Pearson (23 N. S. Rep. 263). 
 
 Gallagher v. Taylor (1 R. & G. 279). 
 (iiites V. Davidson (5 R. & G. 431). 
 Grant v. Cameron (2:} N. S. Rep. 50). 
 
 3 S. C. R. 296. 
 
 7 S. C. R. 348. 
 S. C. Dig. 426. 
 21 S. C. R. 139. 
 
 8 S. C. R. 192. 
 
 14S. C. R. 734. 
 12 S. C. R. 446. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 343. 
 
 None. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 740. 
 
 9 S. C. R. 239. 
 
 S. C. Dig, 845 sub nom. 
 Creighton v, Kuhn. 
 
 14 S, C, R. 254. 
 
 4 S, C. R. 406. 
 17 S, C. R, 333. 
 
 15 S. C, R, 699. 
 
 2 S. C. R. 522. 
 
 iS. C. Dig, 421 sub nom. 
 I Fraser v, Tupper. 
 1 21 S. C. R. 337 sub nma. 
 1 Chandlb! E" ;tricCo. 
 '< v. Fuller. 
 j5 S. C. R. 3(i8. 
 
 :S. C, Dig. 847. 
 
 !18 S. C. R. 716. 
 
 Gregory v. Halifax & Oar>e Breton Coal & S. C Dig. 727. 
 
 Ry. Co. (1 R. & G. 43(5). ; 
 
 (Juildford V. Anglo-French. S. S. Co. (2 R. !) S. C. R. 303. 
 
 & G, 54). 
 
 Halifax Banking Co. v. Creighton (22 N. 
 
 S. Hep. 321). 
 Hannon v. McLean (3 R. & C. 101). 
 
 18 S. C, R, 140. 
 
 3 S. C. R. 706. 
 
 7 S. C. R. 512. 
 
 Hart v. Troop (2 R. & G, 351), 
 
 Harvey v. Pictou Bank (19 N. S. Rep. 196). |l4 S. C. R. 617. 
 
 Hospital for insane, in re (2 R. ft C. 501). |3 S. C. R. 332 Kub iwvi. 
 
 Kearney v, Kean, 
 Howard v, Lancashire Ins, Co, (5 R, & G.ll S. C. R. 92, 
 
 172). i 
 
 Result op Appeal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed in 
 
 part. 
 Appeal quashed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affiimed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal in habeas corpus 
 case not entertained. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed . 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed, 
 .^"dgment affirmed. 
 
Carried to the Supreme Court of Canada. 
 
 61 
 
 Case. 
 
 Hubley v. Archibald (22 N. S. Rep. 27). 
 
 International Coal Co. v. County of Cape 
 Breton (24 N. S. Rep. 496). 
 
 Johnson, G. R. , in re (7 R. & G. 51). 
 
 Jones V. Jolins (20 N. S. Rep. 378). 
 
 Rkpoht on Afpxal. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 116. 
 22 S. C. R. 305. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 329. 
 
 15S.C.R. 398 sutnom. 
 Shorey v, Jones. 
 Joyce V. Halifax Street Ry. Co. (21 N. 8.117 S. C. R. 709. 
 Rep. 531). 
 (24 N. S. Rep. 113). 
 
 Kearney v. Creel man (6 R. & G. 92). 
 
 Kearnev v. Dickson (6 R. & G. 65). 
 
 (20 N. S. Rep. 95). 
 
 Kearney v. Oakes (20 N. S. Reps. 30). 
 
 22 S. C. R. 258. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 33. 
 
 S. C. Dip. 431. 
 14 S. C. R. 743. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 148. 
 
 Keith V. Anchor Marine Ins. Co. (3 R. ( i. 9 S. C. R. 483. 
 
 402). I 
 
 Kenney v. Chisholm (7 R. & G. 497). 
 
 Kenny v. City of Halifax (1 R. & G. 39). 
 King V. Seeton (21 N. S. Rep. 20). 
 Kinney v. Jones (5 R. & G. 244). 
 Lane v. McDonald (2 R. & G. 37). 
 
 S. C. Dig. 539. 
 3 S. C. R. 497. 
 18 S. C. R. 712. 
 11 S. C. R. 708. 
 7 S. C. R. 462. 
 
 Law V. British American Assur. Co. (23 21 S. C. R. 325, 
 
 N. a. Reji. 537). 
 Lawrence v. Anderson (21 N. S. Rep. 466). 
 
 Lecain v. Ilosterman (2 R. & C. 229). 
 
 17 S. C. R. 349. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 827. 
 
 13 S. C. R. 270. 
 
 Logan V. Commercial Union Ins. Co. (6 R 
 
 & G. 309). I 
 
 Lordly v. City of Halifax (24 N. S. Rep. 1). 20 S. C. R. .■)05 
 
 Merchant's Bank of Halifax v. Whidden!l9 S. C. R. 53. 
 (22 N. S. Rej). 200). ! 
 
 " 21 S. C. R. 33. 
 
 Miller v. Duggan (22 N. S. Rep. 140). 
 Moir V. Sovereign Ins. Co. (6 R. & G. 502). 
 Mooney v. Mcintosh (19 N. S. Rep. 419). 
 Morrison v. Kandick (2 R. & C. 148). 
 
 Moss V. E«ireka Woollen Mills Co. (6 R. 
 
 & G. 274). 
 McAllister v. Forsyth (.) R. & G. 1.51). 
 
 McDonald v. Doiill (3 R. & C. 276). 
 
 McDonald v. McMaster (5 R. & G, 438). 
 
 Mcllreith v. Doull (19 N. S. Rep. 311). 
 
 14 S. C. R. 612. 
 14 S. C. R. 740. 
 2 S. C. R. 12. 
 
 11 S. C. R. 91. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 1. 
 S. C. Dig. 384. 
 a. C. Dig. 246. 
 14 S. C. R. 739. 
 
 Result ok Appeal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment in hnhens 
 
 corpus case affirmed. 
 Judgment attirmed. 
 
 Appeal from oi-der for 
 
 new trial quashed. 
 Judgment aiiirmed. 
 
 Judgment aiiinned. 
 
 Judgment afiirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affiiined. 
 
 Judgment afiirmed. 
 
 Judgment afiirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment afiinned. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reverted. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal from judgment 
 setting aside demurrer 
 quaslied. 
 
 •Tudgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
p 
 
 m 
 
 62 
 
 Cases in the Nova Scotia Courts 
 
 Case. 
 
 Rkpoht on Appral. 
 
 11 
 
 .ill 
 
 Ik .'« 
 
 1 
 
 ,^'i 
 
 '!i| 
 M^^ 
 
 1 
 
 PI 
 I ' 
 
 McKay v. Municipality of Cape Breton 
 
 (2i N, S. Rej). 402). 
 McKenzie v, Corbfctt (4 R. & G. 50). 
 
 McPherson v. McDonald (6 R, & G. 242), 
 
 North American Life Assiir. Co. v. Cr»i- 
 
 Ken (() R. & G, 440). 
 Nova Scotia Central Ry. Co. v. Halifax 
 
 Banking Co. (23 N. S, Rep. 172). 
 
 Oakes v. City of Halifax (1 R. & G. 98). 
 
 18 S. C. R. 639. 
 S. C. Dig. 384. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 416. 
 
 13 S. C. R. 278. 
 21 S. C. R. 536. 
 
 4 S. C. R. 6 to. 
 
 O'Connor v. Merchant s Marine Ins. Co. 16 S. C. R. 331 
 
 (20 N. S. Rep. ru'l). 
 0'C*)nnor v. Nt)va Scotia Telephone Co. 122 S. C. R. 276, 
 
 (23 N. S. Rep. 509). 
 O'Donnell v. Confederation Life Assoc. 
 
 (2 R. & C. .570). 
 
 (2 R. & G. 231). 
 
 (21 N. S. Rep. 169). 
 
 O'Toole V. Wallace (4 R. & G. 357). 
 P.vtch V. Pitman (19 N. S. Rep. 298). 
 Piers V. Elliott (23 N. S. Rep. 276). 
 
 S. C. Dig. 370. 
 
 10 S. C. R. 92. 
 16 S. C. R. 717. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 713. 
 S. C. Dig. 389. 
 21 S. C. R. 19. 
 
 Peoples' Bank of Halifax v. Johnson (23 20 S. C. R. 541. 
 
 N. S. Rep. 302). j ^ 
 
 Pictou Railway Damages, in re (1 R. & G. S. C. Dig. 423 sub. nom. 
 
 448). I Hockin v. Halifax & 
 
 C. B. Ry. & Coal Co. 
 Power V. Meagher (21 N. S. Rep. 184). |l7 S. C. R. 287. 
 
 I 
 Precedence of Ritchie, Q.C., in re (2 R. & 3 S. C. R. 575 sub nom. 
 
 C. 4.">0). Lenoir v. Ritchie. 
 
 Putnam v. Hardman (22 N. S. Rep. 456). 18 S. C. R. 714. 
 
 Queen. The v. Chesley (6 R. & G. 313). 16 S. C. R. 306. 
 
 Queen, The, v. Cunningham (0 R. & G. S. C. Dig. 194. 
 
 31). ! 
 
 Queen, The, v. Preeper (22 N. S. R. 174). 15 S. C. R. 401. 
 
 Queen, The, v. Town Council of Dart- 9 S. C. R. 509. 
 mouth (1 R. & G. 402). 
 
 (5 R. & G. 311). 
 
 Read v. bounty of Cape Breton (19 N. S. 
 
 2li0). 
 
 Ritchie v. Diocesan Synod of Nova Scotia 
 
 (21 N. S. Rep. 30!M. 
 Robertson v. Pugh (20 N. S. Rep. 15). 
 
 Ross V. Hunter (2 R. & G. 44). 
 
 Royal Canadian Ins. Co. v. Smith (5 R. & 
 
 G. 322). 
 Rumsey v. Merchants' Marine Ins. Co. 
 
 (4 R. & G. 220). 
 
 S. C. Dig. 51.5. 
 
 li S. C. R. 8 sub nom. 
 
 Crewe-Read v. Cape 
 
 Breton. 
 18 S. C. R. 705. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 706. 
 
 7 S. C. R. 289. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 385. 
 
 9 S. C. R. 577. 
 
 Rksult ok Appkal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 •ludgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; judg- 
 ment n(>t final. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment rever.**rd. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment that demarrer 
 
 would lie attirmed. 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
Carried to the Supreme Court of Canada. 
 
 63 
 
 CA8E. 
 
 Seaman v. West (5 R. & G. 207). 
 Shanly v, Fitzrandolph (2 R. & G. 199). 
 
 Shelbiirne, Municipality of, v. Marshall 
 
 (19N. S. Kep. 171). 
 Silver v. Dominion Telegraph Co. (2 R. & 
 
 G. 17). 
 Smith V. McLean (24 N. S. Rep. 127). 
 
 Smyth V. McDougall (1 R. & C. 371). 
 
 Rkpout on ArPKAii. Rksclt ok Appeal. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 388. 
 S. C. Dig. 279. 
 14 S. C. R. 737. 
 10 S. C. R. 238. 
 21 S. C. R. 355. 
 1 S. C. R. 114. 
 
 Souther v. Wallace (2 R. & C. 548). 2 S. C. R. 598. 
 
 (20 N. S. Rep. 509). |1(5 S. C. R. 717. 
 Spinney v. Ocean Mutual Marine Ins. Co. 17 S. C. R. 326, 
 
 (21 N, S. Rep. 244). 
 Steel Co. of Canada, in re (5 R. & G. 17, 10 S. C. R. 312 .lub nom, 
 
 49, 141). 
 
 Stuart V. Mott (23 N. S. Rep. 524). 
 
 (24 N. S. Rep. 520). 
 Sword V. Sydney & Louisburg Coal & Ry. 
 
 Ca (23 N. S. Rep. 214). 
 
 Tracey v. Young (5 R. & G 381). 
 
 Troop V. Merchants' Marine Insurance Co. 
 
 (6 R. & G. 323). 
 Trustees of School Section 10, in re (2 R. 
 
 & C. 328). 
 
 Union Bank of Halifax v. Whitman (20 
 N. S. Rep. 194). 
 
 Walker v. The City of Halifax (4 R. & G. 
 
 371). 
 Wallace v. Bossom (2 R. & C. 419). 
 
 Watson V. Municipality of Colchester (6 
 
 R. & G. 519). 
 Webber v. Cogswell (2 R. & C. 47). 
 
 Webster v. Mutual Relief Soc. of Nova 
 
 Scotia (20 N. S. Rep. 347). 
 Willistoii V. Lawson (22 N. S. Rep. 521). 
 
 Woodworth v. Troop (2 R & C. 84). 
 
 Wyman y. Imperial Ins. Co. (20 N. S. 
 Rep, 487). 
 
 York V. Canada Atlantic S. S. Co. (24 N. 
 S. Rej). 430). 
 
 Merchants' Bank of 
 Halifax v. Gillespie, 
 14 S. C. R. 734. 
 
 21 S. C. R. 152. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 147. 
 13 S. C. R. 500. 
 
 2 S. C. R. 690 sub nom. 
 Pictou School Trus- 
 tees V. Cameron. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 410. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 175. 
 2 S. C. R. 488. 
 S. C. Dig. 175. 
 2 S. C. R. 15. 
 16 S. C. R. 718. 
 19 S. C. R. 073. 
 
 2 S. C. R. ir.S mh nom. 
 
 Landers v. Woods- 
 
 wortli. 
 16 S. C.R. 71.-). 
 
 22 S. C. R. 167. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment aff med. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment aflirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Stands for judgment. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 .Judgment aflirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 •Judgment affirmed . 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 

 [64] 
 
 Is, -J 
 
 I!' 
 
 1 } 
 
 m 
 
 
 ii 
 
 i'k 
 
 m 
 
 CASES IN THE COUETS OF NEW BEUNSWICK 
 CAKKIED TO THE PRIVY COUNCIL. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Arklow, The. Emery v. Cichero. 
 
 Brookfield v. St. Andrews & Quebec Ry, 
 
 Co. (N. B. Dig. 1231). 
 Bank of New Brunswick v. McLeod. 
 
 Dow V. Black. 
 
 McKay v. Commercial Bank (1 Pugs. 1). 
 
 Renaud, Ex parte (1 Pugs. 273). 
 Ruggles V. Greene. 
 Russell V. The Queen. 
 
 Wickham v. New Brunswick & Canada 
 Ry. Co. (6 All. 175. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Result op Appeal. 
 
 9 App. Cas. 13(5, 53 L. Judgment reversed. 
 J. 9 ; 50 L, T. 305. 
 
 13 Moo. P. C. 510. 
 
 Beauchamp Dig. P. C. 
 Cases 104. 
 
 L. R. 6 P. C. 272 ; 44 
 
 L. J. 52 ; 32 L. T. 
 
 274; 23 W. R. 637. 
 L. R. 5 P. C. 394 ; 43 L. 
 
 J. 31 ; 30 L. T. 180 ; 
 
 22 W. R. 473. 
 None. 
 
 21 Can. Gaz. 415. 
 
 7 App. Cas. 829 ; 51 L. 
 J. 77 ; 40 L. T. 89J). 
 
 L.R. IP. C.64;3Moo 
 N. 8. 416; 35 L. J. 6; 
 12.1ur.N.S.34;14L. 
 T. 311;14W.R.251. 
 
 Judgment varied. 
 Leave to appeal refused. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment aiBrmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 
[65] 
 
 CASES IN THE NEW BEUNSWICK COUKTS 
 
 CARRIED TO THE SUPREME COURT 
 
 OF CANADA. 
 
 Case. 
 
 Report on Appeal. 
 
 Result of Aiteal. 
 
 Albert Mining Co. v. Spurr (22 N. B. ,9 S. C. R. 35. 
 
 Rep. 34r.). I 
 
 Almon V. Lewin (4 P. & B. 284). 15 S. C. R. 514. 
 
 Anderson v. Fawcett (24 N. B. Rep. 313) S. C. Dig. 8. 
 
 3 P. & B. 34. i 
 
 Ayr American Plough Co. v. Wallace (30,21 S. C. R. 256. 
 
 N. B. Rep. 42t>). 
 
 Baird, Ex parte. In re Ellis (27 N. E. IC S. C. R. 147 
 
 Rep. J«)). 
 BarsH V. Merchants' Marine Ins. Co. (20 
 
 N. B. Rep. 3.3i)). 
 Burns v. Cassels (2G N. B. Rep. 20) 25 N. 
 
 B. Rej). 13. 
 Busby V. Winchester (27 N. B. Rep. 231). IG S. C. R. 336. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 185. 
 14 S. C. R. 256. 
 
 Byrne v. Arnold (24 N. B. Rep. 161). S. C. Dig. 107. 
 
 ! 
 
 Cameron v. Domville (1 P. & B. 647). S. C. Dig. 421, 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed as being 
 
 l)remature. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgi' jnt affirmed. 
 
 Appeal from rule for now 
 
 trial quashed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Chapman v. Delaware Mutual Ins. Co. (23 S. C. Dig. 387. 
 
 N. B. Rep. 121). 
 Chajnnan v. Providence Washington Ina. S. C. Dig. 386. 
 
 l^o. (23 N. B. Rep. 105). 
 Christie v. Citv of St. John (30 N. B. Rep. 21 S. C. R. 1. 
 
 4i)2) 2i) N.'B. Rep. 311. ' 
 
 Clarke v. Scottish Imperial Ins. Co. (2 P. 4 S. C. R. 192. 
 
 & B. 240). 
 Cleveland, in re, (29 N. B. Rep. 70). 19 S. C. R. 78 sub mm. Judf^ment affirmed 
 
 I Lamb v. Cleveland. ; 
 Close v. Temple (4 P. &; B. 234). S. C. Dig. 765. Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judi,'ment affirmed. 
 
 iJudgmeni affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Collins V. Everitt (2 P. Sf. B. 469). 
 
 S. C. Dig. 210. 
 
 Commeau v. Burns [Gloucester Election] 8 S. C. R. 204. 
 
 (22 N. B. Rei). 573). 
 Connely v. Guardian Assur. Co. (30 N. B. 20 S. C. R. 208. 
 
 Rep. 316). 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Appeal quashed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Danaher, Ex parte, (27 N. B. Rep. .554). 17 S. C. R. 44 sub nom. Judgment affirmed 
 
 I Djinaher v. Peters 
 Driscoll V. Millville Mutual Ins. Co. (23 11 S. C. R. 183. 
 N. B. Rep. 160). I 
 
 Edwards v. Mayor, etc., of St. John (22 S. C. Dig. 48. 
 N. B. Rep. 297). i 
 
 M.D.— 5 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 iJudgment reversed. 
 

 66 
 
 Cases in the New Brunswick Courts. 
 
 m 
 
 ic. 
 
 4 
 
 n 
 
 Cask. 
 
 Elliott V. Flanaprau (25 N, B. Rep. 154). 
 Ellis V. Power (4 P. & B. 40). 
 
 Fairweather, Exparte, (30N.B. Rep. 531), 
 
 Ferguson v. Trooi> (28 N. B. Rep. 301) 25 
 N. B. liep. 440). 
 
 Gerow v. Providence Washington Ins. Co. 
 
 (28 N. B. Rep. 435). 
 Gerow v. Koyal Canadian Ins. Co. (27 N. 
 
 B. Rep. 513). 
 Gilbert v. McDonald (28 N. B. Rep. 102). 
 
 Gilchrist v. Dominion Telegraph Co. (4 P. 
 
 &B. 241)3 P. &B. rwX 
 Gleeson v. Domville (:{ P. & B. 77. 
 
 Griffiths V. Town of Portland (23 N. B. 
 Rep. 559). 
 
 Halifax Banking Co. v. Smith (29 N. B. 
 
 Rep. 4()2). 
 Hall V. McFadden (21 N. B. Rep. 586) 3 
 
 P. & B. 340. 
 Harris v. Greene (25 N. B. Rep. 451. 
 
 Hutchinson v. Trustees of St. John Y. M. 
 
 C. A. (2 P. & B. 523). 
 
 Jonas V. Gilbert (4 P. & P. 61, 64). 
 
 Jones V. DeW(»lf (23 N. B. Rep. a56). 
 
 Jones V. Tuck (23 N. B. Rep. 447). 
 
 Jordan v. Great Western Ins. Co. (24 N. B. 
 Rep. 421). 
 
 Lawless, Ex parte, (2 P. & B. 520). 
 
 Rkpoht on Appkal. 
 
 12 S. C. R. 435. 
 6 S. C. R. 1. 
 
 Peters v. City of St. 
 John, 21 S. 0. R. 674. 
 17 S. C. R. 527. 
 
 Lewin, Ex parte, (23 N. B. Rep. 591). 
 
 Lockhart, Executor, etc., v. Ray (4 P. & 
 B. 129). 
 
 Maritime Bank, in re Troop's Case (27 N. 
 
 B. Rep. 295). 
 Moran v. Taylor (24 N. B. Rep. 39). 
 
 McDonald v. Mayor, etc., of St. John (25 
 
 N. B. Rep. 318) 24 N. B. Rep. 370. 
 MoFee v. jSIowat (3 P. & B. 252). 
 
 McGhee v. Phoenix Ins. Co. (28 N. B. 
 
 Rep. 45). 
 McKean v. Jones (29 N. B. Rep. 340). 
 
 17 S. C. R. 387. 
 16 S. C. R. 524. 
 16 S. C. R. 700. 
 S. C. Dig. 844. 
 S. C. Dig. 343. 
 11 S. C. R. 333. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 710. 
 S. C. Dig. 723. 
 16 S. C. R. 714. 
 S. C. Dig. 210. 
 
 5 S. C. R. 356. 
 S. C. Dig. 767. 
 11 S. C. R. 197. 
 14 S. C. R. 734. 
 
 3 S. C. R. 117 suhtwm. 
 
 Lawless v. Sullivan ; 
 
 rev. by Pr. Coun. 
 
 App. Gas. 373. 
 11 S. C. R. 484. 
 
 6 S. C. R. 308 sub nom. 
 Ray V. Annual Con- 
 ference of N. B. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 453. 
 
 11 S. C. R. 347. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 1. 
 
 5 S. C. R. 66. 
 
 18 S. C. R. 61. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 489. 
 
 Result ok Appkal. 
 
 Judgment affi lined 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 •Fudgment reversed. 
 
 Judgitient affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. . 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed, but 
 reversed on further ap- 
 peal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 New trial ordered. 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
Carried to the Supreme Court of Canada. 
 
 67 
 
 Cask. 
 
 but 
 rap- 
 
 McLellan v. North British & Mercantile 
 Ins. Co. (30 N. B. Rep. 2(53). 
 
 McMilhiii V. South-Weat Boom Co. (1 P. 
 & ]i. 715). 
 
 McMillan v. Walker (21 N. B. Rep. 31). 
 
 McSarley v. Mayor, etc., of St. John (4 P. 
 & B. 47S>). 
 
 New Brunswick Ry. Co. v. McLeod (1 P. 
 
 & B. 257). 
 Nicholson v. Temple (4 P. & B. 248). 
 
 O'Brien v. O'Brien (27 N. B. Rep. 145. 
 
 Parker v. White (27 N. B. Rep. 442). 
 
 Pattison v. Mayor, etc., of St. John (2 P. 
 
 & B. «;{()). 
 People'is National Bank of Charleston v. 
 
 Stewart (3 P. & B. 268). 
 Peters v. Hamilton (3 V. & B. 284). 
 
 Prcvincial Government of N. B. v. Mari- 
 time Bank (27 N. B. Rep. 379), 
 
 Queen, The, v. Ellis. £x parte Baird (28 
 
 N. B. Rep. 497). 
 Queen, The, v. Maritime Bank, (27 N. B. 
 
 Rep. 357). 
 Queen, The, v. Mayor, etc., of Frederic 
 
 ton (3 P. & B. ]"39). 
 Queen, The, v. McFarlance (27 N. B. Rep. 
 
 529). 
 Queen, The, v. Theal (21 N. B. Rep. 449). 
 
 Rand, Ex parte (24 N. B. Rep. 374). 
 
 Richardson v. Vaughan (28 N. B. Rep. ( 
 364) 24 N. B. Rep. 75. ^ 
 
 Ring V. Pugsley (2 P. & B. 303). 
 
 Ritchie v. Snowball (26 N. B. Rep. 258). 
 
 Robinson v. New Brunswick Ry. Co. (23 
 N. B. Rep. 323t. 
 
 Scammell v. James (28 N. B. Rep. 278). 
 
 Sohofield V. Carvill (21 N. B. Rep. 558). 
 
 Shireflf v. Muirhead (25 N. B. Rep. 196). 
 
 Simonds v. Chesley (30 N. B. Rep. 303). 
 
 Steadman v. Venning (22 N. B. Rep. 639). 
 
 Stephenson v. Fraser (24 N. B. Rep. 482). 
 
 Stephenson v. Miller (27 N. B. Rep. 42). 
 
 Rkpoht on Appkal. 
 
 21 S. C. R. 288. 
 3 S. C. R. 700. 
 6 S. C. R. 241. 
 
 6 S. C. R. 531. 
 
 5 S. C. R. 281. 
 S. C. Dig. 114. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 297. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 699. 
 S. C. Dig. 173. 
 S. C. Dig. 81. 
 S. C. Dig. 763. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 695 ; aff. by 
 Pr. Coun. [1892] A 
 C. 437. 
 
 22 S. C. R. 7. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 657. 
 3 S. C. R. 505. 
 16 S. C. R. 393. 
 
 7 S. C. R. 397. 
 
 US. C. R. 312 8M/;?iow. 
 
 Chapman v. Rand. 
 17S.C. R. 703. 
 
 21 S. C. R. 359. 
 S. C. Dig. 241. 
 
 14 S. C. R. 741. 
 
 11 S. C. R. 688. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 593. 
 9 S. C. R. 370. 
 14 S. C. R. 735. 
 20 S. C. R. 174. 
 9 S. C. R. 206. 
 S. C. Dig. 575. 
 16 S. C. R. 722. 
 
 Result of Appeai,. 
 
 Judgment afKrmed. 
 Judgment aflirmed. 
 Judgment aflirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed by 
 
 equal division. 
 Judgment aflirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmtd. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; no cause 
 
 before Cc'Urt. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed in 
 part. 
 
 Appeal in criminal case 
 
 quashed. 
 Judgment reversed in 
 
 part. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment aflirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal c[uashed for want 
 
 of notice. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; proijer 
 parties not before Court. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
68 Cases in the iV. B. Gts. Carried to the Sup. Ct. of Can. 
 
 Cahk. 
 
 Stewart v. Snowball (3 P. & B. 597). 
 
 St. John, Mayor, etc., of v. Sears (28 N. 
 
 B. Rep. i). 
 Swim V. ShcTiff (4 P. & B. 25). 
 
 Swinny v. Rodburn (27 N. B. Rep. 175). 
 
 Tufts V. Chapman (22 N. B. Rep. 195). 
 
 Vanwart v. New Brunswick Ry. Co. (27 
 
 N. B. Rep. .59). 
 Vaughan v. Roberts (23 N. B. Rep. 343). 
 
 Vernon v. Oliver (23 N. B. Rep. 392). 
 
 Vye V. Alexander (28 N. B. Rep. 89). 
 
 Waterbury v. Dewe (3 P. & B. 225). 
 
 Rkpokt on Appeal. Rkhult ok Appral. 
 
 S. C. Dig. 570. 
 18 S. C. R. 702. 
 8. C. Dig. 142. 
 
 16 S. C. R. 297. 
 8 S. C. R. 543. 
 
 17 S. C. R. 35. 
 11 8. C. R. 273. 
 11 S. C. R. 150. 
 16 a. C. R. 501. 
 6 S. C. R. 143. 
 
 Waterous Co, v. Morrow (2 P. & B. 11). S. C, Dig. 138. 
 
 \YvWni V. Vaughan (2 P. & B. 70). 
 White V. Miller (27 N. B. Rep. 143). 
 
 5 S. C. R. 35. 
 
 I 
 
 Il6 S. C. R. 445. 
 
 Williams v. City of Portland (29 N. B. 19 S. C. R. 159. 
 
 Rep. 1). 
 Wood V. Viuigluin (28 N. B. Rep. 472). 18 S. C. R. 703. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment aifinned. 
 Tudgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 '.Judgment reversed. 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 '.Judgment affinned. 
 .Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 I 
 
 -Tudgment reversed. 
 
 •Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
[69] 
 
 CASES FROM THE COURTS OF MANFrOBA 
 CARRIED TO THE PRIVY COUNCIL. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 RKI'OKT ON Al'PKAL. RESULT OK Al'l'EAL. 
 
 I 
 Logan V. City of Winnipeg (8 Man. [18!I21 A. C. 445 ; (U L. 
 L. R. 3). 1 J. :.« ; t>7 L. T. 4Uy. 
 
 The Queen v, Riel (2 Man. L. R. 321) 2 10 App. CaH. 07.t ; 5.t L. 
 Man. L. R. .102). t ..o ^ , t m „n,. 
 
 Winnipeg Street Ry. Co. v. Winnipeg 
 Kiec. Ky. Co. 
 
 J. 28 ; 54 L. T. 33!). 
 22 Can. Gaz. 584. 
 
 Judgment affiniied. 
 
 I<eave to appeal refuued. 
 
 Stands for Judgment, 
 
 CASES FROM THE MANITOBA COURTS CARRIED 
 TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 
 
 Cask. 
 
 REPOKT on Al'PKAL. 
 
 Ashdown v. Manitoba Free Press Co. (G 
 
 Man. L. R. 578). 
 Atty.-Gen. Canada v. Fonseca (5 Man. L. 
 
 R. 173). 
 Barrett v. City of Winnipeg (7 Man. L. R. 
 
 273). 
 
 Bernardine v. Municii)ality of North Duf- 
 ferin(GMan.L. R. 88). 
 
 Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Municipality 
 of Cornwallis (7 Man. L. R. 1). 
 
 Dederick v. Ashdown (4 Man. L. R. 139). 
 
 Federal Bank of Canada v. Canadian Bank 
 of Commerce (2 Man. L. R. 257). 
 
 Hutchinson v. Calder (1 Man. L. R. 46) 1 
 Man. L. R. 17. 
 
 20 S. C. R. 43. 
 17 S. C. R. 012. 
 
 IDS. C. R. 371; rev. 
 
 Pr. Coun. [1892] 
 
 C. 445. 
 19 S. C. R. 581. 
 
 19 S. C. R. 702. 
 
 15 S. C. R. 227. 
 13 S. C. R. 384, 
 
 S. C. Dig. 785. 
 
 by 
 A. 
 
 Result op Appeal. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed, but 
 restored on further ap- 
 l)eal. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affinned. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
TO Casen from the Manitoba Ct». Carried to Siqh Ct. of Canada. 
 
 Cahk. 
 
 m 
 
 m 
 
 LiHgar Kleotion ('use [CuIUiih v. Rdhh] (7 
 Man. L. R. 5HI). 
 
 London 9c, Canadian Loan Co. v. Munici- 
 pality of MorriH (7 Man. L. K. 128). 
 
 IfKroHT ON Api'KAL. 
 
 •JO H. C. R. 1. 
 1» S. C. R. 434. 
 
 Martin v. Manitoba Free I'reHS Co. (8 Man. 21 S. O. R. 518. 
 
 L. R. 50) 7 Man. L. R. 413. 
 Morden v. Municipality South Dufferin 10 S. C. R. 204. 
 
 «5 Man. L. R. 515). I 
 
 McMillan v. Byers (4 Man. L. R. 7«) 3 15 S. C. R. 104, 
 
 Man. L. R. 34;i. i 
 
 Ontario Bank v. McMicken (7 Man. L. R. 20 S. C. R. 548. 
 
 203). ! 
 
 Reg. V. Nevins (5 Man. L. R. 153). ,S. C. Dig. 427. 
 
 Rolston V. Red River Bridge Co. (1 Man. S. C. Dig. 664 
 
 L. R. 235). 
 Ryan v. Wlielan (6 Man. L. R. 565). 
 
 Shaw V. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. (6 Man. 
 
 L. R. 334) 5 Man. L. U. 108. 
 Stephen's v. MoArthur (« Man. L. R. 406). 
 
 Union Bank v. Bulmer, 2 Man. L. R. 380. 
 
 Wright V. City of \Vinnii)eg(4 Man. L. R. 
 46). 
 
 20 S. C. R. 65. 
 16 S. C. R. 703. 
 10 S. C. R. 446. 
 S. C. Dig. 88. 
 13 S. C. R. 441. 
 
 RK8UI.T OK API'EAI., 
 
 Judgment revenied in 
 l>art. 
 
 Ap|ieal quashed ; judg- 
 ment not final. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Appeal quashed ; case not 
 originating in Sujwrior 
 Court. 
 
 {Judgment affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 ApiJeal from judgment on 
 
 demurrer quashed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 Leave to extend time to 
 appeal refused. 
 
 ! 
 
[71] 
 
 CASES FROM THE COURTS OF BRITISH COLUM 
 
 BIA CARRIED TO THE SUPREME 
 
 COURT OF CANADA. 
 
 Cahr. 
 
 Edmonds v. Tiernan (2 B. C. R. 82). 
 Foley V. Webster (2 B. C. R. 137). 
 Harper v. Harper (2 B. C. R. 15), 
 Sea V. McLean (2 B. C. L. R. 67). 
 
 Rki'okt OS Af'i'EAr,. 
 
 Rksult ok Appeal. 
 
 21 S. C. R. im. 
 
 21 H. 0. R. 580. 
 
 21S. C.R. 273 ««fc now. 
 Cameron v. Harper. 
 14 S. C. K. ()32. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment afflnned. 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
 CASES FROM THE COURTS OF PRINCE EDWARD 
 
 ISLAND CARRIED TO THE PRIVY 
 
 COUNCIL. 
 
 Caue. 
 
 Cambridge, in re. 
 Monkton, in re. 
 
 Repokt on Appeal. Result of Appeal. 
 
 3 Moo. P. C. 175. 
 
 1 Moo. P. C. 4.55. 
 
 Leave to apiieal refused ; 
 a|ii.eal lay only from 
 Executive Council. 
 
 Judgment reversed. 
 
[72] 
 
 CASES IN THE COURTS OF PEINCE EDWARD 
 
 ISLAND CARRIED TO THE SUPREME 
 
 COURT OF CANADA. 
 
 Case. 
 
 Rkpi>kt OS Appeal. Result ok Ai'I'Kai., 
 
 Holman v. Green (2 P. K. I. Rep. 320). f, S. C. R. 707. 
 
 I 
 
 Kelly V. Siilivan (2 T. E. I. Rep. 34). !l S. C. R. 1. 
 
 jJudgmont affirm"!. 
 
 1 
 
 'Judgment rfersti!. 
 
 CASES IN THE COURTS OF THE NORTH-WEST 
 
 TERRITORIES CARRIED TO THE SUPREME 
 
 COURT OF CANADA. 
 
 Case. 
 
 Report ox Appeal. Result of Appeal. 
 
 
 m 
 
 AngUH V. Calt^'vrv School Board (X.-W. T.W S. C. R. 716. 
 Rop. [Pt.'l.jW). ; 
 
 Emerson v. Pannennan (I N.-W. T.'lO S. C. R. 1. 
 Rop. [Pt. TI.] 3.5). < 
 
 Ferguson v. Fairchild (IN.-W, T. Rpp.!21 S. 'J. R. 484. 
 [Pt. III.] 41). I 
 
 Moore v. Martin (1 N.-W. T. Rep. [Pt. IT]. 'iS S. C. R. 6M. 
 
 48). I 
 
 Quirk V. Thompson (1 N.-W. T. Rep. ! 18 S. C. R. 696. 
 
 [Pt. I.] 88). i 
 
 Appeal quiished ; ease not 
 originating ••:-■ .Siii)erior 
 Court. 
 
 .ludgroent affirmed. 
 
 Judgment affii'nied. 
 
 Api)eal riua^hed ; judg- 
 ment nfit final. 
 
 Judgment affirmed. 
 
 ^!i 
 
;VARD 
 
 1.1'I'EAI.. 
 
 nwl. 
 
 JE 
 
 IM'EAI,. 
 
 ; ease not 
 Superior 
 
 led. 
 
 led. , 
 I ; judg- 
 ed.