^. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 !!! 1.1 us mm £ LS. 12.0 25 2.2 IIIIL25 i 1.4 I: I I 1.6 6" Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WiST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14SS0 (716) •72-4503 r;:e Quality of prir Qualiti inAgale de ('impression Includes supplementary materii Comprend du metiriel suppl4mentaire Only edition available/ Seuie Mition disponible r~~] Pagea damaged/ r~1 Pages restored and/or laminated/ r^ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ r~l P»v,— detached/ r~yl Showthrough/ nn Quality of print varies/ nn Includes supplementary material/ r~n Only edition available/ D Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc.. have been refiimed to ensure the best possible imege/ Les peges totaloment ou pertielloment obscurcies per un feuillet d'arrata, une peiure. etc., ont iti fiimies A nouveau da fapon i obtanir la meilleure image possible. This item is filmed at the reduction retio checked below/ Ce document est filmi au taux de rMuction indiqu* ci-dessous. 10X 14X 18X 22X 20X XX 7 12X 16X 20X a«x 28X 32X Th« copy filmad h«r« has baan raproducad thanks to tha ganareaity of: Library of ParliamMit and tha National Library of Canada. L'axamplaira fllmA fut raproduit sHtoa i la giniroait* da: La BibUothAqoa du Partomant at to BibliothlqiM nationato du Canada. Tha imagaa appaaring hara ara tha baat quality posslbia conaMarlng tha eondltion and lagibiHty of tha original eopy and In icaaping with tha filming contrast spaolfieationa. Laa imagaa auhrantaa ant 4t4 raprodultaa avac la phia grand sain, eompta tanu da la condition at da la nimat* dn I'aMmplaira fiim4, at mi conformiti wo laa eondltiona du eontrat da Original coplM in printad papar eovara ara fNmad baginning %wlth tha front eovar and anding on tho laat paga with a printad or IHuatratad impraa> sion, or tho basic covar whan a ppropr ia ta. AH othor original copiaa ara flimad baginning on tha first psga with a printad or illi.stratad Impraa- aion. and ending on tha laat paga with a printad or illustratad impraaslon. Ljs SKampl a l r aa originaux dont la couvorturo an papiar aat imprimda sont fHmcw sn common^ant par la pramlar plat at an tarmlnant salt par la damMra paga qui comporta una amprainta dimpraaalon ou dliuatration. soit par lo sacond plat, salon la eaa. Toua laa autraa asamplairaa originaux sont fttmds sn common y ant par la pr a m W ra paga qui comporto uno am pr ainta di m p r aasie n ou dlHustradon at an tarmlnant par la damMra paga qui comporto uno taUa Tha laat raeordad frama on aach mierofleha shaM contain tha symbol — i^ (moa n ing "CON- TINUED"), or tho symbol ▼ (moaning "END"), Un daa symbalaa suhmnts apparaitra sur la damMra imaga da chaqua microfioha. salon lo caa: la symboM -^slgnHIo "A SUIVRr', lo symboM ▼ signiflo "RN". plataa, charts, stc.. may ba fMmad at diff arant raductlon ratioa. Thoaa too iarga to ba antiraly includad In ana axpoaura ara fBmad baginning in tha uppar laft hand eomor. loft to right and top to bottom, aa many itamaa aa raquirad. This following diagnma IHuatrata tha mathod: ate., pauvant Atra fMnda A daa taux da rdduction diffdrant s . lAraqua la doeumoiK aat trep grand pour 4tra raproduit on un saul cHehd. H sst fUmd i partir da I'angto supdriaur gaucha. da gaucha i droito. ot da haut mt baa. an pranant la nombra dimagaa ndcasssira. Laa dlagrammaa suivants IHuatrantla mdthodo. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 ^1^^ ■«■■ /^t I L^'J (From the Proeeedinyg qfthe OayMdian Journal, iOth March, 1886). THE CAMPAIGN OF i8i5 BY R. E. KINGSFORD, M. A. %. ,-»-4»" .11 SS^fS* if' .asc ^-.M««/,K> IgV' M-IAVUOJ «iNvrt\J. s^a J 3 e 2 u H R : / d ij « (j) •=? V . \. W%vS\ /■ A': ( \x "-^vmivi'^L Ar^vvN^wwM' -gi s^>v\^nA ~^\ '-^vwsVw ^ a\ ■WvWm^^ ^^"■6^1, % THE CAMPAIGN OF 4815 BY R. E. KINSKORD, M.A. The Rebellion of the French nation against Louis XVI. was the pro- test of humanity against oppression. The French, that lively, courage- ous and industrious race, deserve the w6rld's thanks for their desperate resolution to inaugurate a new system. Their thorough- ness in carrying out the resolve brought upon them the enmity of almost all other nations, but those very nations profit this day by the Revolution, to punish which they invaded France. Even the insular English, then politically a century in advance of the Conti- nent, found that they had much to learn. An impulse was given to aspirations for freedom which was communicated to each of the Continental nations in succession, and this impulse, through impeded from time to time, has never ceased in its action. But just as, in the case of individuals, men suffer in their own persons the con- sequences of originality, so the French nation bitterly paid for its generous self-sacritice on the altar of Freedom. A saci'ed cause was defiled ; enthusiam was replaced by fanaticism ; fanaticism gave way after a struggle to charlatanism ; charlatanism supported itself by mur- der. The end was chaos. Out of chaos sprang Napoleon. A man of the sword, he smote with the sword, and he crushed the vermin who, daring to crawl on the statue of liberty, had stained it with their filth. But the statue itself he overturned, and he placed himself on the pedestal. From that eminence he was in turn struck down, but he long held the position by virtue of extraordinary genius, courage and energy. We shall see him make a supreme effort to recover him- self, almost succeed, then sink, baffled and exhausted, into a Slough of Despond, from which he was destined never to emerge. We propose to give a succinct account of the military operations of the 15th, 16th, 17th and 18th of June, 1815.. A careful examina- tion of the authorities has led us to the opinion that the popular belief of Englishmen and men of English descent with regard to this campaign requires revision, and that there are salient features which have been ignored by most English writers. ■5r Proc. Can. Inst. 3'^ Ser. SCALE JO MILES TO THE INCH. MAP OP PART OF BELGIUM T CuV2^T»A.IGN OF COPIED FROM EDGAR Q.U I N E Dx: LA CAM.PAGNE DE Vol. IV PI. II. (•Blouvain I JELGIUM TO ILLUSTRATE THE .PA.IGN OF 1815. :dgar q.uinet's mistoire DE LA LPAGNE DE 1815. -U The general English idea is that " The Duke " drubbed the French well, and that he never was in serious danger. The Prussians think, on the other hand, that the English would never have beaten the French but for their help, and that they are, equdly with the English, entitled to the credit of victory, perhaps more so. The French, again, believe that their idol would have annihilated both English and Prussians had there not been treason. They know that the Prussians were defeated and the English surprised, and why they themselves were ultimately beaten they have never understood. Examination of the facts should inform us which of the two first opinions is correct and give r ^ an explanation for the third. This examination we projjose to make briefly, but fairly and dispassionately. The story we have to tell may be called the " Drama of Waterloo." It consists of a Prologue and Four Acts. We propose to narrate it in that manner. PROLOGUE. Napoleon left Elba on the 26th February, 1815. He landed at Cannes on the 1st March. He arrived at Fontainebleau on the 20th March. That is, in three weeks he was tuaster of France. The first prominent man who joined him was General Labedoy^re. We shall meet his name again. The army and the Marshals declared for the Emperor on the 22nd of March. But the Bourbons had been in power since the preceding May. A few of the Marshals and a portion of the superior ofBcera remained true to them. In the interval, also, they had broken up the old Napoleonic organization. They had replaced the Tricouleur by the White Lilies. They had changed the designations of the various regiments, studious in every thing, Mrs. Partingtons as they were, to use their feeble broom against the tide of modem feeling. But there were with the colours on the 1st April 223,972 men, 155,000 of whom were ready to take the field. The evidence as to the condition of these men seems to Establish that they were well uniformed and armed. Napoleon claimed that ^hey were not so, but it seems that his statements were incoiTect on jbhis point. Here is afiTorded the opportunity of presenting the real obstacle in the way of forming a fair judgment of the occurrences we are about to relate. Napoleon pub]igheeror the advantages which should have been gained on the left. Ney on the left and Napoleon on the right were simultaneously engaged from about two o'clock. Napoleon defeated Bliicher. What then did Ney effect ? All that can be said is that he pre- vented Wellington from joining Bliicher. This was no small achieve- ment. Wellington, after arriving at Quatre Bras at half-past eleven, rode over to Bliicher and promised him that by three or so in the afternoon the English army would join the Prussians. A vain pro- mise never kept. The Duke found Ney in his road and the way was barred. Could Ney have done more than he did? It has been shewn that he could, had he acted on his orders more promptly. But it has been shewn further that the Marshal's whole force engaged was never more than 22,000 men, and that he made no use of D'Erlon's Corps of 20,000 men. This episode is the most inscrutable in the whole campaign. The absence of these twenty thousand men alone prevented Ney from inflicting a decisive defeat upon Wellington at Quatre Bras. Siborne, ^ who is the Duke's most uncompromising admirer, explicitly admits this fact. How did it happen 1 It seems impossible to give a satisfactory answer. But the facts seem to be as follows : When Ney got his orders from Napoleon at half-past ten o'clock in the morning to advance, D'Erlon was at Jumet. (See map.) He was ordered b> Ney, as part of the geneml movement, to advance as far as Frasne, detaching one division to Marbais. At twelve o'clock he commenced his march. Hearing the action going on in front, he left his column and rode on in advance to Frasne. He drew rein there, and while conversing with some of the superior officers was joined by General Labedoy^re, who had come from Napoleon. That genei*al showed D'Erlon a i)encil note which he was taking to Ney, and which ordered the Marshal to detach D'Erlon's Corps towards Ligny. He added that he (Labe-' doydre) had already lyfiven the order for the change of direction of D'Erlon's column, and pointed out to D'Erlon himself the direction in which to go to join it. 17 Nf>y, in a letter dated the 26tli June, 1815, complains that Napo- leon had taken away D'Erlon's Corps without notifying him (Ney), and having, therefore, to act without D'Erlon, the battle of Quatre Bras was lost. D'Erlon's account of the matter seems to contradict Ney's statement. Col. Heymes, Ney's Chief of Staff, confirms D'Erlon's account, but says that Col. Laurent, not General Labe- doy^re, was the aide who carried the message. As D'Erlon was put in niotiori by Ney about eleven o'clock, in obedience to Napoleon's letter and second despatch, and as the distance from Jumet to Frasne is a little over nine miles, and as D'Erlon galloped on in advance of his column, he must have met General Labedoydre in about an hour and a half, or two hours, after eleven o'clock — say one o'clock. Now any order sent from I^apoleon to Ney by the hand of General Labedo- y^re, and which reached Frasne by one o'clock, must have left Charle- roi very shortly after half-past ten, as Cha,rleroi is about ten miles from Frasne — if sent from Fleurus it would be eight miles. The order which Labedoydre is said to have cai'ried, and to have shewn to D'Erlon, was contradictory of Napolepn's third despatch, and not • only of that despatch, but of the whole of the previous second des- patch. What had happened so early in the day to induce Napoleon to take away the first corps from Ney] The only reason which ap]>ears at all satisfactory is, that Napoleon, as he descended from his carriage at Fleurus, at twelve o'clock, saw that there was urgent need in that part for D'Erlon just then. Instaad of having only a part of the Prussian array, he found three-fourths of it in front of him. And yet this explanation is not quite satisfactory, because later on in the day, namely at two o'clock and three o'clock, Napo- leon sent two more despatches to Ney. The first repeated the order to attack, and informed Ney of the arrangements for Grouchy'si attack at half-past two on Ligny, and stated that there was a corps of troops (not an army) to attack. The second informed Ney that the action was at its height, and ordered him to manoeuvre towards the emperor. Neither of these despatches says one word about D'Erlon, or intimates in any way that he had been withdrawn from Ney. It could not be either of these which Labedoy^re shewed D'Erlon, because the first says nothing about D'Erlon's moving toward lagny, and the second was sent too late to have reached D'Erlon at the hour he and his division were on the road to Frasne. Again, in a despatch written by Napoleon to Ney the next day 2 18 (the 17th), Napoleon complains that the marshal had not unite