^Wl 
 
 P" 
 
 ■■■■^■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i 
 
 *5^i8^< 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 
 
 !.0 Sfii^liS 
 
 22 
 
 Ml 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 V • 
 
 •HI tjk^;ii:ir 
 
 ^^^ 
 
 ^.^ 
 
 ^\<<^\ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^Sdoices 
 
 VjUlpUIClUUli 
 
 iwiltMNiiiiMr 
 
 4^ 
 
 {fVkiV%*M» 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CiHIVI/ICIVIH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 CaiMdian Imtitut* for Historical IMicroroproductions / imtitut earadion do microroproductions hittoriquos 
 
Tachnle*! and Bibliogniphic NotM/NotM taehniquM at bibliographiquM 
 
 Th« InttituM hM attsmptMl to obtain tha boat 
 original eo|iy availaMa for Aiming. Paaturaa of thia 
 copy wtiich may ba bibliograpliicaily uniqua, 
 ¥vhich may aitar any of tlM imagaa in tha 
 raproduction, or wliich may algnifioantly olianga 
 tha uauai mathod of filming, ara oliacicad balow. 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Colourad covara/ 
 Couvartura da couiaur 
 
 I I Covara damagad/ 
 
 Couvartura andommagAa 
 
 Covara rattorad and/or laminatad/ 
 Couvartura raataurAa at/ou pailicuMa 
 
 I — I Covar titia miaaing/ 
 
 La titra da couvartura manqua 
 
 Coiourad mapa/ 
 
 Cartaa g^ographiquaa an couiaur 
 
 Coiourad inic (i.a. othar than biua or blacic)/ 
 Encra da couiaur (i.a. autra qua blaua ou noira) 
 
 I I Coiourad piataa and/or iiiuatrationa/ 
 
 Pianchaa at/ou iiiuatrationa an couiaur 
 
 Bound with otiiar matariai/ 
 RaiiA avac d'a Jtraa documanta 
 
 Tight binding may cauaa ahadowa or diatortion 
 along intarior margin/ 
 
 Lareiiura sarrAa paut cauaar da i'ombra ou da la 
 diatortion la long da la marga intMaura 
 
 Blank laavaa addad during raatoration may 
 appaar within tha taxt. Whanavar poaaibla. thaaa 
 iMva baan omittad from filming/ 
 11 aa paut qua cartainaa pagaa blancliaa ajoutiaa 
 iora d'una raatauration apparaiaaant dana la taxta, 
 mala, ioraqua caia Atait poaaibla, caa pagaa n'ont 
 paa «ti fiimAaa. 
 
 Additional commanta:/ 
 Commantairaa aupplAmantairaa: 
 
 Tl 
 to 
 
 L'Inatitut a mifirofilm4 la malliaur axamplalra 
 quil lul a 4ti poaaibla da aa proourar. Laa dAtaiia 
 da eat axampMra qui aont paut-ttra unlquaa du 
 point da vua bibliographiqua. qui pauvant modifiar 
 una imago raprodulta, ou qui pauvant auigar una 
 modHloatlon dana la m4thoda normala da fllmaga 
 aont indiqute ci-daaaoua. 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 IZl 
 
 n 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 Coiourad pagaa/ 
 Pagaa da couiaur 
 
 Pagaa damagad/ 
 Pagaa andommagAaa 
 
 Pagaa raatorad and/or laminatad/ 
 Pagaa raatauriaa at/ou paiiicuMaa 
 
 Pagaa diacolourad, atainad or foxad/ 
 Pagaa dAcoiorAaa. tachatAaa ou piqu4aa 
 
 Pagaa datachad/ 
 Pagaa ditach^aa 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Tranaparanca 
 
 Quality of print variaa/ 
 QualitA inigaia da I'impraaalon 
 
 inciudaa auppiamantary matariai/ 
 Comprand du matirial auppl4mantaira 
 
 Only adMon availabia/ 
 Sauia Mition diaponibia 
 
 Pagaa wholhf or fMrtiaHy obacurad by arrata 
 allpa, tiaauaa, ate., have baan rafiimad to 
 anaura tha beat poaaibla image/ 
 Laa pagaa totalamant ou partialiement 
 obacurdaa par un faulHat d'arrata, una palura, 
 etc., ont 4t* f limAaa i nouvaau da fa9on h 
 obtanir la mailleure image poaaibla. 
 
 Tl 
 
 P< 
 of 
 fll 
 
 Oi 
 bi 
 th 
 ai4 
 ot 
 fit 
 all 
 or 
 
 iB-V- 
 
 (•■ 
 I' 
 
 Tl 
 
 ah 
 
 T« 
 wl 
 
 Ml 
 dH 
 
 an 
 b« 
 
 Hi 
 
 ■W.JMV, 
 
 m 
 
 Thia item ia filmed at the reduction ratio ctMclced below/ 
 
 Co document eat fllm4 au taux da riduction indiqu4 ol-deaaoua. 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 MX 
 
 
 
 
 itx 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 2M 
 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |x 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 3 
 
 12X 
 
 Itx 
 
 aw 
 
 a«x 
 
 'M 
 
Tlweopy 
 totiM 
 
 lit 
 
 u 
 
 liftor 
 
 h&tm hM bMn rtproduoMi thanks 
 off: 
 
 Library of tho Public 
 Arohhrot of Canada 
 
 Tho Imasaa appooHng horo aro tho boat 
 
 quollty 
 loslblllty 
 tho 
 
 of tho original oopy ond In hooping 
 filming contract apoelficatlons. 
 
 Orlglnol eoploa In printod papar covora aro fHmod 
 boglnning wMi tho front covor and anding on 
 tho hMt paga wMi a prlntad or Nhistratod Impraa* 
 sion, or tho bock oovor whon approprlato. All 
 othor orlglnol coplaa ara fNmad baglnning on tho 
 firtt pogo with a prlntad or Muatratatl Impraa- 
 •Ion. and anding on tha last paga wHh a prlntad 
 or lllustratad Impraaa l on. 
 
 Tho last racordod frama on aaeh microflcho 
 shsN contain tho symbol — ^ (moaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or tho symbol ▼ (mooning "END"), 
 wMchovor appHaa. 
 
 L'axamplaira fHmA f ut raproduit grica A la 
 g4n4ro al ti d<: 
 
 La bIbllothAquo dos Archives 
 puMiquss du Csnada 
 
 Laa Imagas suhrantaa ont iti raprodultoa avae la 
 pitia grand sdn, compto tonu do lo condition at 
 do la nattatA do l'axamplaira fllmA, at 1% 
 conformHA avac las conditions du contrat ds 
 fllmaga. 
 
 Laa axamplalraa orlglnaux dont la couvarturs an 
 paplar ast ImprimAa sont fllmAs on commonpant 
 par la pramlar plat at on tarmlnam salt psr is 
 dsmMro paga qui comporto una omprdnto 
 d'Impraaalon ou d'lilustratlon. solt par lo second 
 plat, salon lo coa. Tous Iss sutrss oxomplairss 
 orlglnoux sont fllmAs on common^snt par is 
 promMro pogo qui comporto uno omprdnts 
 d'improsslon ou d'HIustrstion ot on torminsnt psr 
 Is domlAro pogo qui comporto uno tolio 
 omprdnto. 
 
 Un dos symbolos suhrsnts sppsrsttrs sur Is 
 dsmMro imaga da chaqua microflcho, ssion is 
 ess: Is symbdo — ^ signifis "A 8UIVRE", is 
 symbolo ▼ slgnHls "FIN". 
 
 s*. 
 
 *'>*-'WvaM«4 
 
 
 Mops, plataa. charta, ate., may ba fHmad at 
 diffara nt roduc:lon rotlos. Thoso too lorgo to bo 
 entirely Inchidod In one expoouro ere filmed 
 beginning In tho upper loft hand comer, loft to 
 right and top to bottom, aa many framee aa 
 required. Tho following diagrams Illustrate the 
 trtMhod: 
 
 Los csrtes, planches, taMeeiix, etc.. pouvent Atre 
 nimAc A dee taux da rAductlon diff Arents. 
 Lorscpio lo document cot trop grond pour Atre 
 roproidult en un soul cHohA, 11 est fllmA A psrtir 
 do Tangle supAriour geuche, do gsucho A dro'te, 
 ot do haut en has, sn prenent lo nombre 
 dlmagae nAcoesolre. Loe diegremmes suivsnts 
 illustrent ie mAthode. 
 
 vets 
 
 
 
 lelura. 
 lA 
 
 1 2 3 
 
 □ 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
wmmmmmi 
 
mmmmmmm 
 
 
 A LETTER 
 
 TO TIIB 
 
 BISHOPS AND CLERGY 
 
 OF THB 
 
 1^ ' IN CANADA, 
 
 VROM 
 
 FEANCIS FULFORD, D.D., 
 
 LORD BISHOP OF MONTREAL AND METROPOLITAN. 
 
 PRINTED BY JOHN LOVBLL, ST. NICHOLAS STREET. 
 
 1862. 
 
"Eiprsedicare veritatem nihil est, si cor a hngak dissentiat ; et audire 
 Teritatem nihil est, si non auditionem fructus sequatur," 
 
 Sti. Augustini JEnarratio in PtcUmmn Ixvi. 
 
 M 
 
 '!■>■: 
 ■Vb- 
 
A LETTER. 
 
 Sm Hodsb, Momtrkbal, 
 
 April 28th, 1862. 
 
 Right Rbv. and Ret. Brbthrbn : 
 
 Early in the month of March I saw in a number of !7%e Record, Eng- 
 lish newspaper, an account of a clerical meeting held at Islington on 
 the 13th January last, at which Archdeacon Hellmuth, in the course of a 
 long speech, which he delivered on that occasion, was reported to have 
 made the following statement : — 
 
 " Although he should be sorry to say anything which should mar in 
 the slightest degree the happy spirit which seemed to pervade that 
 meeting, yet he could not hel' observing that there was a very great 
 lack of evangelical men in those vast colonies, — not that there are not 
 godly, good, and hard-working men, but too few in number for those 
 vast regions which God in his providence has given to this country ; he 
 could not hide it, — he must speak out the truth, that evangelical men 
 are at a very great discount in those colonies generally, and that an 
 effort is being made to rear a hierarchical structure, which he feared 
 would not tend, as is supposed by some, to strengthen the cause of pure 
 Protestant and evangelical truth. The object of his mission to this 
 country was (he continued) to raise funds for the establishment of a 
 sound evangelical college, from which men are to be sent forth to pro- 
 claim the Gospel of Ohrist in all godly simplicity and fulness ; and be 
 trusted, as this is the very first effort of the kind to establish a thor- 
 oughly Protestant theological college in the colony, evangelical men 
 will effectually help this good cause." 
 
mmmm 
 
 4 
 
 On the 10th March I wrote to the Archdeacon to nsk him, if the above 
 waa a correct report of what he hail said ; and on the ISth Ajiril I 
 received an answer from him, simply directing "my attention to a gen- 
 eral statement wliich he had addressed to Thr Rvconl, as an answer to a 
 letter previously received on the suhjcct by a Presbyter of the Diocese of 
 Montreal." 
 
 Without going into the dctaib of his controversy with this Presbyter, 
 I may mention that in the early part of hia letter I find what I suppose 
 I may consider as a reply to my enquiry. IIo says, 
 
 " I would at the very outset observe, that The Record did not pro- 
 fess to report my address verbatim, and I feel therefore less responsible 
 for the very word^, or even sentiments employed in the abbreviated 
 summary printed in The Record of the above date, jit the same time I 
 am prepared to admit that the substance of my speech is given with sujjicient 
 accuracy."* , 
 
 And The Record having been thus furnished with a text, enforced the 
 S'jl'ject with an appropriate commentary. The Recoi'd of Jan. 22nd says : 
 
 " It is also to be regretted, tlmt jeveral of the Canadian dipceses are 
 deeply tainted wiih the leaven of Tractarianism ; and that the local Col- 
 leges, at which the Canadian clergy receive tlieir training, are almost 
 wholly under this baneful influence. Whilst, then, we would exhort 
 our readers to the exercise of Christian liberality towards Canadian 
 missionary operations, we must also repeat our friendly cautions as to 
 the channels through which funds are contributed. We need not say 
 that in this respect the Colonial and Continental Church Society is 
 unexceptionable. And among more special objects, we have every con- 
 fidence in the effort now making by Archdeacon Hellmuth, to raise 
 
 * The Archdeacon alterwards sayB: "I am unable now to recall tlic ipsiasima 
 verba used by luc at Islington, but I certuinly intended my remarks to apply to 
 Upper Canada, as may be conclusively gathered from the fact that I made refer- 
 ence only to Trinity College, Toronto, the teachings of which I certainly believe 
 (with my vouerable Bishop) to he dangerous in a very high degree." Whatever 
 may have been his intentions, his speech, which he admits is given with sufficient 
 accuracy, conveys no hint of any such limitation, it is the Canadian Clergy as a 
 body, the Canadian Colleges, the C.'inadiun Hierarchy, that are animadverted 
 upon, while the Trinity College (lucstion follows in detail as an apt illustration. 
 And so it is understood by The Record; and so it is left for weeks to be understood 
 by the public, while so sad a state of things in this great Province is exciting tho 
 gympathy of those whom lie expects to contribute towards the jE20,000 that ia to 
 provide the remedy. 
 
i 
 
 - <i 
 
 ^ 
 
 -J 
 
 .£20,000 for the cstahlislimcnt of a College baaeil on EvanKoliciil princi- 
 ples, aud for other iinportiiiit purpoijcs, in the diocese of Huron. The 
 proposal to found a college is well fitted to counteract the peculiar evil 
 to which wo have referred,— that of a Colonlul-born clergy, nurtured in 
 a course of collegiate instruction wiiich obscures the great trullis of the 
 Gospel. We sincerely hope that Dr. llelliuuth's timely visit to this 
 country will be tiie means of realiy.iug the Ilishop of Huron's plan." 
 
 It would no doubt be generally felt that it matters little to us what 
 are Dr. Hellmuth's private opinions ; but when such statements are 
 publicly made by an Archdeacon specially accredited in England by 
 one of the Canadian Bishops, they obtain a degree of importance that 
 could not otherwise attach to them ; and which will I hope justify tne, 
 Hit your Metropolitan, in addressing this letter on the subject to you, the 
 Bisliops and Clergy of the Canadian Church. 
 
 For some time past, as is well known, there iias been a controversy 
 agitating the Western Dioceses respecting the University of Trinity 
 College, Toronto.^ I am not sulficiently master of this subject in its 
 present state to enter into any detailed review of it; which, while it 
 might for sufTicient reasons be now inexpedient for me, is for my pres- 
 ent purpose not necessary. But \vhatever may be the difficulties that 
 now exist, I cannot but hope, that nothing will eventually prevent such 
 a solution of them, as may lead at last to the cordial co-operation of all 
 those Dioceses in the welfare of tlio University. When I met the Bishop 
 of Huron at Kingston, at the Consecration of the Bishop of Ontario, he 
 assured me ihaf in the eff'ort now making for his diocese in England, he 
 never for an instant had contemplated anything like a rival College or 
 University to Toronto, but merely a Theological Institution for his own- 
 Candidates, previous t6 their ordination ; upon the plan, as I under- 
 stood him, of the Colleges at Wells, Chichester, and elsewhere. I at 
 once told him that I thought everj' Bishop might most reasonably aim 
 at having such an institution connected with his Cathedral. Whatever 
 may be the excellence of the Universities here or in England, we may 
 well all desire, if we can accomplish it, to have our candidates for a 
 time under our own eyes ; and to test, by something better than an 
 ordinary examination, their real fitness for entering into the holy office 
 of the Ministry. But to multiply Universities and general Colleges- 
 must, in this country, be certainly most injurious, making it impossible 
 
! 
 
 to maintain any high standard of education ; nor Is It to bo defended 
 upon the plea of making them exponents of particilar doctrines of the 
 Church. The Church of England avowedly admits, on certain subjects, 
 of some divergence of opinion ; which it may be difHcult exactly to 
 define, and vhich, when pualied to extremes on either side, becomes a 
 serious evil. But a University, of all places, and capecially if connected 
 with different dioceses, ought fairly to represent the Church ; and, by a 
 general admixture of men of different casts of thought and tempera- 
 ment, prevent those extreme exhibitions and sectional tendencies, 
 which always, as their natural result, at last produce a sensible depar- 
 ture from those principles which the Church of England has decided 
 that she ought to uphold. The great hindrance to such wholesome 
 united action, for ibe genera! purposes of a University, arises from a 
 spirit of partizansbip being allowed to gain a mastery over the spirit of 
 the Christian. In the course of my experience, now of many years, in 
 Tarious situations, and mixed up and acting with men of every shade of 
 opinion, I have learned to welcome at all times the co-optration of'the 
 sincere Christian, — to dread that of the partizan, whatever may be the 
 modification of his opinions ou those subjects, about which, as Church" 
 men, we are found at times to differ. An attempt at cxclusiveness 
 soon creates an opposition, and destroys brotherly love ; whereas those 
 who really are*influenced themselves by the Spirit of Christ, will be able 
 to find room in their hearts to love nany, whom party prejudice would 
 have taught thera to look upon as strangers. Qod grant that not only 
 in the matter of the University of Trinity College, but in all the united 
 action of the Canadian Church, we may be influenced by such a spirit ; 
 and prove " bow good and pleasant a thing it is for brethren to dwell 
 together in unity." 
 
 But granting that the object of the Bishop of Huron is a very fair one, 
 and that the official application, as authorized by him, to the Society /or 
 the Promotion of Christian Knowledge, in London, is based on very 
 reasonable grounds, yet it is certainly presented under a very different 
 aspect by Archdeacon Hellmuth, in his speeches at public meetings in 
 England. He gives out that he wants to raise £20,000, " for the estab- 
 lishment of a sound, evangelical college ;" but, certain that sucb ". simple 
 statement as the one made to the Christian Knowledge Society, would 
 
be utterly inadequate to excite uueh public sympathy aa he required, he 
 adopts quite a different tone ; and uses language which, had It been 
 uttered at the meeting of that Society, would, he knew, have led to the 
 immediate rejection of his appeal. He says : " He must speak out the 
 truth : that ovaagolical men are at a very great discount in those colo- 
 nies generally, and that an effort is being made to rear a hierarchical 
 structure, which ho feared would not tend, as is supposed by some, to 
 strengthen the cause of pure Protestant and evangelical truth. The 
 object of his mission to this country was to raise funds for the establish- 
 ment of a sound evangelical college." And The Record, urgently recom- 
 mending the appeal, follows up i;he argument by stating, that " It is to be 
 regretted that several Canadian dioceses are deeply tainted with the 
 leaven of Tractarianism ; and that the local colleges at which the 
 Ganadian clergy receive their training, are almost wholly under this 
 baneful influence." 
 
 Archdeacon Hellmuth has the reputation of being a very astute and 
 successful collector of funds, and he, no doubt, now remembereu what an 
 appeal to such feelings produced in the case of Father Ohiniquy, for 
 whom, a few years ago, he vouched, when such large sums were obtained 
 from the credulous English public, much to the astonishment of many 
 thoughtful people in Canada. Intending, on the present occasion, to 
 attempt the same line, it was n ' iral for him to make the most of the 
 Trinity College controversy. But that was not sufScient for his purpose. 
 He appeals therefore to his hearers on behalf of all Canada, and gives 
 them to understand that what he has now iu contemplation will renew 
 the whole spirit of the Church there. " This [he assures his hearers] is 
 the very first effort of the kind to establish a thoroughly Protestant 
 theological college in the colony." No wonder that The Record tells its 
 readers, the next week, " that the local colleges at which the Canadian 
 clergy receive their training, are almost wholly under the baneful 
 inflrence of Tractarianism :" a comment which is tacitly allowed to 
 pass, being useful as seconding the appeal. Now, perhaps, on the 
 present occasion, the Archdeacon might have considered the college at 
 Sabrevois, in this diocese, as hardly important enough to interfere with 
 the sweeping nature of his statements ; yet many an urgent appeal has 
 of late been grounded by himself and his friends, upon the claims of this 
 
'f 
 
 T 
 
 Tery institution (wliicli is wholly under the nmnngcmcnt of the Colonial 
 Church ami School Soiuhj), as a mcana of Hupiilyini; no cvnngulical 
 luiuistry for the eullRlitcnnicnt of some 000,000 or 700,000 of our breth- 
 ren in Canada. Hut, at any rate, tliero ia the University of ltidhoi)'i 
 College, Lcnnoxvillo, to which the Archdeacon has been under no small 
 obligations, in past years, and respecting which the Bishop of Quebec 
 has sent mo the following letter : — 
 
 BAnDFiELD, 8th April, 1862. 
 
 My d£ar Lord, 
 
 It grieves me very much to hoar of the representations respecting 
 tlie Church in Oanada,attributcd to Archdeacon Hollmtith, in the account 
 of his endeavors to raise a feeling in England, whicli may bo turned to 
 account for the pecuniary brnefit of the undertaking of which he is the 
 advocate there ; representations wliich assuredly arc uusustaiaed by 
 fact, and which are most conspicuously at variance with past proceed- 
 ings of his own, as well as with the language which ho has again and 
 again held in conversations with myself. Dr. Ilellrautb, whom I 
 adopted as a theological student at Bishop's College, whom I ordained, 
 and afterwards appointed as its Hebrew professor, and for whom I 
 procured, by application to the Archbishop of Canterbury, the degree of 
 D.D., was engaged at one time in publicly soliciting aid in England for 
 that institution, which continues to this day, under the same aiMpices 
 and the same management as fiom the first ; and be has ^old me, at 
 different times, how ho has fought the battles of the College in this 
 country, affirming, and proving by reference to the prescribed course of 
 study, the soundness of its teaching, and the falsehood of imputations, 
 which some parties were seeking to cast -upon it, of Komanizing 
 tendencies. Moreover, (I mention this chiefly because I am to a certain 
 extent identified with the theological character of the Diocese), he has 
 often spoken, with much apparent warmth and emotion, of his convictions 
 respecting my own just appreciation of gospel truth, and assured me of 
 his regarding me as a spiritual father, as ho regarded Principal Nicholls 
 in the light of a brother whom be luved ; and since he' came to reside at 
 Quebec, he averred his preference for the Cathedral as a place of 
 w./rship, and engaged a pew in it accordingly, which jo still holds. 
 
 The terms of cordial friendship which have subsisted between Dr. 
 Hellmuth and myself, make it peculiarly distressing to me to comply 
 
'If 
 
 ''M 
 
 9 
 
 wtth your dcolre for informailon of ilieno particulars, of which it h 
 deaignod to wake use, but inagis antica vcritat. 
 
 lioliove mo always, 
 
 My dear lUHhop, 
 
 Very Hincoroly yours, 
 
 O. J. QUEI5E0. 
 
 P. S. — Dr. Hcllmiith, who was for a Hliort timo at CobourR, in the 
 diocoso of Toronto, before ho entered at HiHhop's College, was ortlained 
 deacon by me in May, 184(3, and priest, in tSoptomber of the same year. 
 
 O. J. Q. 
 
 But passing from those topics to the complaint of the " great want of 
 evangelical men in these colonies," and tho diaoouragcmcnt they are 
 supposed to meet with here, I would ask whether tho Archdeacon is 
 himself the type of what is to be considered as an Evangelical man ? If 
 ho is, I believe, and certainly hope he is right in stating, that they are 
 not numerous ; I confess men of such a stamp have never had any 
 encouragement from me. , 
 
 I have now before mo n copy of a letter addressed by the Montreal 
 Committee of the Cohn'ml Church and School Society to the Parent 
 Society* in London, and signed by every member of tho Committee, at 
 the timo when Dr. Hellmuth was about to be sent out as tho General 
 Superintendent of that Society for all British North America. In this 
 letter they press upon the Society the importance of arresting their de- 
 cision respecting that appointment; and state that the name of the 
 
 Lord Bishop- of Montreal is not affixed, for the reason that he was 
 obliged to leave town before the special meeting. But ho has authorized 
 us to state " that he fully coincides with the other members, in the opinion 
 they entertain of tho contemplated measure, and that ho should regret 
 the interruption of that harmony, which at present is est jlished between 
 himself and the Corresponding Committee of your Society." In con- 
 sequence of this representation. Dr. Hellmuth came out as Superintendent 
 of B. N. A., with the exception of the Diocese of Montreal. I have 
 acted now with that Society in perfect harmony for many years, and I 
 
 * Now tho Colonial and Continental Church Society. 
 
f 
 
 1] 
 
 I 
 
 f: 
 
 10 
 
 trust nothing will occur to interrupt it ; bu' if this point had not been 
 at once concr'ded, I must have withdrawn from all connection with it. 
 And it is but right, after making this statement, that I should give 70U 
 my reasons. 
 
 Not long after I came to Canada, when I was still but new to the 
 duties of my oflSce, and little acquainted with the people, Dr, Hellmuth 
 called on me, and stated that bis father in law. Gen. Evans, was anxious 
 that he should be settled near him in Montreal ; and as there was sup- 
 posed to be a want of more church-room iu this city, he, the General, 
 was Willing to build a church, at an expense of £3000, on some land of 
 his in Sherbrooke St., and the only condition he appended to tais offer 
 was, that his son-in-law, Dr. Hellmuth, should be the first incumbent. I 
 had no hesitation in replying, that s} liberal an offer deserved every 
 attention ; and if the General would give mc his proposition in writing, 
 I would, after consulting with one or two friends, return them an 
 answer in the course of a few days. Dr. Hellmuth, however, said, the 
 General would rather not have the matter talked about, and that it was 
 not necessary to put anything in writing, as the General was a great 
 invalid, and did not wish to be troubled about it ; but he would leave it 
 all to me ; I might decide everything, and have the church consecrated, 
 provided he, Dr. H., was the first incumbent. He also pressed me to 
 give him an immediate answer, as he was going out to Sherbrooke (of 
 which town he was then Rector,) the next day, and it would depend 
 upon my decision whether he should remove his family to Lennoxville, 
 and live there as Professor of the Oollege, or come in to Montreal. I 
 thought he was in an unnecessary hurry for my decision,, and wishing 
 still for something more definite in writing, I proposed to call iipon the 
 General the next morning, when I begged that i*omethiag might be 
 ready for me. I called accordingly ; and again was much pressed for 
 an immediate decision, but uould get nothing either from the General or 
 Dr. Hellmuth, except the same general statement that every thing would 
 be left to me to do as I liked ; and I was again desired not to mention ft 
 to any one at present. Dr. Hellmuth subsequently offered, if £3000 
 were not suificient, to advance £1600 more ; bat this he could only 
 lend, as, on account of his family, he should require it to be eventually 
 repaid, by tbo congregation or otherwise. I said I thought we might 
 
11 
 
 contrive to build a plain, usdful Church for the £3000, having the site 
 also ; but if we had a debt of £1600, besides being a drag upon the con- 
 gregation, we could not have it consecrated. Upon which Dr. Hellmuth 
 said, " Oh I but the General is not going to give his £3000 ; he will ad- 
 vance it on security of the Church for a time, without interest ; and let 
 you have the land, which he values at £800 an acre, at half-price." " In- 
 deed," I exclaimed, " then I have been quite undei a misapprehension 
 all this time. The General has a great deal of land in that part of the 
 city, I believe ?" " Yes," said Dr. Hellmuth, "a great number of lots." 
 I immediately saw through the whole ma.ioBuvre. For the benefit of 
 General Evans' land, and to enable his son-in-law to settle in Montreal, 
 we were to build a church for him, which was to be burdened with an 
 exceedingly heavy debt. And this proposal was made to me verbally ; 
 I could never, though I rep'^ated^y asked for it, get the least memorandum 
 of so important a matter, in writing ; and I was not to be allowed to 
 consult a single friend respecting it ; while I was urgently pressed to 
 give an immediate decision. If I had unguardedly accepted the offer 
 as first made, I r. Hellmuth would immediately have made his family 
 arrangements and entered into engagements depending upon it ; and 
 then would have considered me bound in honor afterwards to carry it 
 through ; however contrary it might have turned out to what I had been 
 led to expect. I immediately put an end to the discussion, merely say-' 
 ing that I presumed I was not at liberty to mention the matter to any 
 one ; which Dr. Hellmuth said that they desired me not to do. And I 
 did not speak of it to a single individual ; but to my surprise, very 
 shortly, I found that there was great indignation felt in certain quarters 
 because, as it was asserted, General tilvans had offered £3000 to build a 
 church on his land, and I had refused to accept the offer. And this was 
 construed into a discouragement of "an Evangelical man ;" whereas I 
 had been prepared to eater heartily into the plan, until I found that the 
 whole business was an attempt to take me in. This certainly opened 
 my eyes to Dr. Hellmuth's real character ; and however his astuteness 
 and plausible manner may havu continued to deceive others, he has 
 altogether failed, as I believe he is fully conscious, ever to blind me 
 again ; and the more I have observed his course, the less reason have I 
 had to alter my present opinions. Not that I think I am at all singular 
 
IS 
 
 II' 
 
 in such opinions, very far from it ; tliongli otliers may be unwilling to 
 avow them. But I feel thai his influence, clever and plausible as he is 
 is likely to be so injurious, and not least so, to that very Evangelical 
 caubc, in its best sense, of which he assumes to be the champion ; and I 
 consider his attack upon the Canadian Church and Canadian institu- 
 tions, so unwarranted, except for the most miserable personal and party 
 purposes, that I cannot hesitate, whatever may be the consequences, to 
 speak out plainly what I believe to be necessary for the cause of Evan- 
 gelical purity and truth, and the good of the Cl^urch. 
 
 As one very recent proof that I am not wrong in refusing to place 
 any reliance upon his testimony, I may mention that I have now before 
 me the Report, in an English newspaper, of a meeting held, on behalf of 
 the Colonial Church and School Society, last November ; at which 
 Archdeacon Hellmuth, with a view, I suppose, of exciting some special 
 interest amongst those present in the cause of the Society, tells them, 
 after speaking of Canada as a great field for the operations of the 
 
 Society, that " he knew they had an interest in the Revd. Mr. — '■ ,' 
 
 (this gentleman had formerly resided at the place where the meeting was 
 held,) " who was stationed at ■ in Upper Canada ; and he was glad 
 
 that he could speak to them about that gentleman. He was a very 
 successful laborer, and an able minister, much and deservedly beloved by 
 -bid people. He had his Bible Classes and Prayer Meetings, and God 
 had blessed his work." 
 
 Now it will scarcely be credited, and yet it is a fact, that Archdeacon 
 Hellmuth knew, that before be left Canada last autumn, this very 
 person whom he thus eulogizes, and who is a missionary of his Society, 
 had signed a document confessing that he had spoken absolute untruth ; 
 and that consequently he. Dr. H., as Superintendent of the Society^ 
 had, after enquiry, decided that he must leave his mission, on the ground 
 that he had fallen frarz grace. How are these matters to be reconciled ? 
 Is such testimony to be received In England as reliable evidence for 
 anything ? The Record, I presume upon some such testimony as the 
 Archdeacon could furnish, asserts " that several of the Canadian Dioceses 
 are deeply tainted with the leaven of Tractarianism." And a few days 
 ago I was given an extract from a letter lately received from a person 
 in England mentioning a visit of the Archdeacon, and saying, " he has 
 
•m 
 
 13 
 
 been very successful in the work he came about. I trust they will suc- 
 ceed in getting a truly evangelical College, the one at Toronto being 
 wholly given up to Puseyisra, from whence, — as the Bishop of Calcutta 
 used to say, — they topple into Popery." 
 
 Now without wishing to shirk the question in any way, it is not 
 always very easy to meet such vague sweepiug accusations of Tracta- 
 rianism. It reminds me of the well known lines about " The Extremes 
 of Vice,"— 
 
 " Ask whore's the North? at York, 'tis on the Tweed ; 
 . Ill Scotland, at the Orcades; and there, 
 At GrooDland, Zembia, or the Lord knows where." 
 
 What is denounced as Tractarianism or Puseyism in one place would 
 not be recognised as such in another ; but in the present day it happens 
 to be a convenient cry to raise, whenever it is wished to damage a 
 clergyman, or effect some party or personal object. As I understand it, 
 however, it implies, what is considered, an over-strained attention to 
 ritual observances and symbolic teaching, and unsafe approximation to 
 Romish doctrines and practices. If this be so, I unhesitatingly deny the 
 truth of the statement, "that several Canadian Dioceses are deeply 
 tainted with the leaven of Tractarianism," nor can I believe that even 
 the College of Toronto, in particular, is so full of it as to be about to top. 
 pie over to Popery. Knowing as I do what has passed for Tractarianism 
 in England, I really believe it would be far more agreeable with truth to 
 say, that any single Diocese in that country would exhibit more evidence 
 of such tendencies than the whole of Canada put together. " Evan- 
 gelical men," as such, may not be as abundant as the Archdeacon 
 wishes ; yet he will allow they are to be found in many most important 
 places. The Cathedral at Toronto and all the churches at Kingston have 
 long been so filled ; that at London, three in Montreal, one in Quebec 
 one in Hamilton : all principal cities in the Province. But whether the 
 clergy generally come up to the mark as " Evangelical men" or not, I say 
 it is a positive misrepresentation of the fact, and can only be made either 
 through ignorance, or for some party purpose, and to create a special 
 sympathy in certain quarters, to assert that there is any general preva- 
 lence of what is termed Tractarianism. Orangeism, rather than a 
 tendency towards Rome, I should suspect to be more in favor in the 
 
™ 
 
 t: I 
 
 14 
 
 W«8t ; and any overstrained attention to ritnal obserrances is certainly 
 no charge that can be brought with justice against the Canadian Clergy i 
 Single examples of any excess in thic^ matter will be hard to find ; allow- 
 ing even to the utmost for the effects of the teachings of Trinity College, 
 upon which the Archdeacon dwelt so largely in his speech at Islington.* 
 But condemning, as he does, so sweepingly, the unevangelical tenden- 
 cies of the clergy, he rery naturally proceeds to include in his censure, 
 those who have been placed over them ; '* an effort is being made (he says) 
 to rear a hierarchical structure, which he feared, wouU not tend, as is 
 supposed by some, to strengthen the cause of pure Protestant and evangeli- 
 cal truth." Things no doubt would hare been very different had he 
 himself been a member of that hierarchy ; and I remember that just after 
 I had been notified that I was about to be appointed to this bishopric, but 
 before the appointment was made public, I saw a paragraph in a news- 
 paper, stating that the Hev. I. Hellmuth was to be the bishop. He was 
 quite a stranger to me, even by name, at the time, but I naturally 
 inquired in London what this announcement meant ; and I was informed 
 that his name had never been mentioned to the authorities who then had 
 the arrangement of this matter, and that, consequently, no such appoint- 
 ment had been contemplated. Two or three years ago, during a tempo- 
 rary illness of the Bishop of Quebec, another paragraph appeared, stating 
 that he was going to have a coadjutor, and that Dr. Hellmuth had been 
 selected for the appointment. The Bishop of Quebec, however, had 
 
 * Without entering at all into the merits of thte question, I think it must be 
 admitted that the following remark by the Bishop of Ontario, in bis address to bis 
 Synod, is a very fUr one:— 
 
 "Another consideration which held me back fW>m giving too ready credence to 
 the charges laid against the Frorost, was the fiust that all the Divinity students who 
 applied for Holy Orders were examined and approved by the Bev. H. Grasett, u 
 gentleman of views I believe identical with those bold by the opponents of Trinity 
 College. I never could for a moment endure the supposition (which was the only 
 alternative) that the examining Chaplain was dissatisfied with Iiis candidates for 
 Holy Orders, and yet presented them, at the most solemn occasion of their lives, as 
 ' apt and meet for their learning and godly conversation to exercise the office of 
 Priest duly to the honour of God and the edification of His Church.' The suppo- 
 sition is so odious that my apology for alluding to it is the fact that the Hev. Mr. 
 Grasett, being examining Chaplain, inspired me with confidence that extreme 
 views in a Bomish direction were not apparent in the Divinity students, and this 
 helped to make me snspicioue of the truth of the charges against the Divinity 
 Professor." 
 
 i .1 
 
10 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 never heard that any snch plan had been in contemplation. Anxious, 
 therefore, as some parties may have been, to obtain f>uch a correction for 
 the existing evils of the present Canadian " hierarchical structure," it 
 has hitherto been without success. For myself, as one of that body, I 
 can only hope, as I do most sincerely, that I shall not, either by my 
 neglect of duty, or maladministration of my office, do injury to " the 
 cause of pure Protestant and evangelical truth." I may not, perhaps, 
 set to work exactly after the spirit of the Archdeacon ; and God knows 
 how truly conscious I am, that " in many things I offend daily ;" and 
 how much we all need, whether so-called " evangelical men," or others 
 who may not be allowed to be so classed — how much we all need to be 
 ever seeking a larger measure of God's grace, to enable us to give 
 ourselves more heartily and effectually to the great work whereunto we 
 have been called. When we consider the trust committed to us, and 
 look round and " see the fields everywhere white already to harvest," 
 we may do well to listen now and then to some such stirring appeals as 
 the following: "Tet thou art alive, and they alive ; yet thou hast a 
 tongue, and they have ears : the final sentence hath not cut off their 
 hopes. Preach, therefore ; and preach with all thy might. Exhort them 
 privately and personally, with all the seriousness thou canst : quickly, 
 cr it will be too late ; prudently, or Satan will overreach thee ; fervently, 
 or thy words are like to be disregarded. Remember, when thou lookest 
 them in the face — when thou beholdest the assemblies, that they must 
 be converted, or condemned ; sanctified on earth, or tormented in hell ; 
 And that this is the day : it must be now, or never." * 
 
 But I feel sure that we shall best promote our work, instead of in. 
 creasing divisions and widening separations, " by striving together for 
 the faith of the Gospel :" and certainly many divisions often are origin- 
 ated for very insufficient reasons. " It is not impossible that this desire 
 of unity may have produced some unwilling error of love ; but certainly 
 I am most free from the wilful love of error. In questions of an inferior 
 nature, Christ regards a charitable intention much more than a right 
 opinion."! 
 
 In my own Diocese, in our general work, in the meetings of our Synod 
 
 * B. Baxter, Disooftree, Ecol. iz. 10. 
 t Arohbp. Bramhall. 
 
16 
 
 1" I 
 
 and elsewhere, I am thankful to say, we know no division of party ; we 
 have some that will be owned as amongst the leading " Evangelical men" 
 in Canada ; and large as is the field of labor before us, I have been too 
 glad to welcome amongst us any good and faithful servants of Ghriet, 
 without distinction of party ; only impres. .ng upon them, whatever side 
 they might be. inclined to take, that I could not encourage any attempt 
 to carry on the work of this Diocese through perpetual strife and con- 
 troversy. " I have often thought that the chief occasions of men's dif- 
 fering so much in their opinions were, either their not understanding 
 each other ; or else, that instead of ingenuously searching after truth, 
 they have made it their business to find out arguments for the proof of 
 what they have once asserted."* 
 
 This is very true : when men get heated by a controversy, it is very 
 difficult to arrive at any amicable solution of a quarrel ; their consis- 
 tency becomes pledged to go on with their party, and to give support to 
 foregone conclusions. 
 
 may God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, our only Saviour, 
 the Prince of Peace, give us grace seriously to lay to heart the great 
 dangers we are in by our unhappy divisions. May He take away all 
 hatred and prejudice, and whatever else may hinder us from godly 
 union and concord ; that as there is but one Body, and one Spirit, and 
 one Hope of our Calling, one Lord, one Faith, one Baptism, one God 
 and Father of us all, so we may henceforth be all of one heart and one 
 soul, united in one holy bond of Truth and Peace, of Faith and Charity, 
 and may with one mind and one mouth glorify Him, through Jesus 
 Christ our Lord.f 
 
 I remain. 
 
 Ever your &ithful Brother in Christ, 
 
 F. MONTREAL. 
 
 i 
 
 * Bp. Butler, Correspondence with Dr. Samuel Clarke, letter 2. 
 t Prayer for Unity, in the Book of Common Prayer. 
 
 ' I 
 
,ilv 
 
 i 
 
 4