IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-S) 
 
 5< 
 
 
 / 
 
 .V 
 
 
 f/. 
 
 ^"(5 
 ^ 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 ■^ ^ III 2.2 
 
 U 
 
 2.0 
 
 1.8 
 
 U IIIIII.6 
 
 V] 
 
 <^ 
 
 /] 
 
 /# 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 w 
 
 7 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 m 
 
 \ 
 
 m 
 
 ^\ 
 
 "% 
 
 V 
 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
 % 
 J 
 
 '<i 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 6^ 
 
 '% 
 
5? ..W 
 
 Zi 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 f 
 ^ 
 
 m 
 
 % 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 n 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 Couverture endommagie 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur6e et/ou peiiiculie 
 
 I I Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 I I Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure sorriu peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intirieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout6es 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, iorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 filmdes. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires supplimentalres: 
 
 The 
 to tl 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 4t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite. ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 r^odification dans la mAthode normale de filmage 
 tont indiquAs ci-dessous. 
 
 |~~| Coloured pages/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommag6es 
 
 Pages restored and/oi 
 
 Pages restaur6es et/ou pellicul6es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxe< 
 Pages ddcoiories. tacheties ou piqu^es 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages ddtachdes 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Quality in6gale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materii 
 Comprend du mat6riel suppiimentaire 
 
 I I Pages damaged/ 
 
 {~~| Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 I ~1 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 I I Pages detached/ 
 
 r~^ Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 I I Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 The 
 
 POS! 
 of tl 
 film 
 
 Orig 
 
 begi 
 
 the 
 
 sion 
 
 othe 
 
 first 
 
 sion 
 
 or il 
 
 I — I Only edition available/ 
 
 The 
 shai 
 TIN( 
 whi( 
 
 Map 
 diffe 
 entir 
 begii 
 right 
 requ 
 metl 
 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc.. have been ref limed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure. 
 etc.. ont 6t6 filmies A nouveau de fa^on i 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film^ au taux de reduction indiqui ci-dessous. 
 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 
 
 
 16X 
 
 
 
 
 20X 
 
 
 
 
 24X 
 
 
 
 
 28X 
 
 
 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 National Library of Canada 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reprodult grSce d la 
 g6n6rosit6 de: 
 
 Biblioth^que nationale du Canada 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la netteti de l'exemplaire film6, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprim6e sont filmds en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration. soit par le second 
 plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont film6s en commenpant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol -^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbole — »• signifie "A SUiVRE", le 
 symbole V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 filmds d des taux de reduction diff^rents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour §tre 
 reproduit en un seul ciichd, il est film6 d partir 
 de Tangle supdrieur gauche, de gauche d droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la m6thode. 
 
 12 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 

 THE MANITOBA QUESTION 
 
 TBBE SIDE OF 
 
 Mr, Bodwell's Fallacies Exposed, 
 
 MR. JOSEPH MARTIN AND 
 HIS METHODS. 
 
 VICTORIA, B. C. 
 
 THE COLONIST STEAM PRESSES, 
 
 1896. 
 
 LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT 
 
/ 
 
 THE MANITOBA SCHOOL CASE. 
 
 A Reply to Mr. E. V. Bodwell's argument against 
 
 the School System in operation in Manitoba 
 
 prior to 1890, by A. E. McPhillips, 
 
 Barrister-at-Law. 
 
 Having carefully perused the printed reports of Mr. E. V. 
 Bodwell's political address, delivered at the Victoria theatre on 
 Thursday evening, December 26th, and realizing that such 
 an address distributed broadcast amongst those unfamiliar 
 with the true facts and circumstances of what is now known 
 throughout the Dominion as the Manitoba School Case, must 
 create a wholly false and distorted impression of this question, 
 I venture to submit to the electors of Victoria, B. C. , the fol- 
 lowing reply thereto; and I do so, believing firmly that all fair- 
 minded and patriotic men will, in honesty of purpose, be most 
 willing to receive and consider the true facts, and therefrom form 
 an opinion for therAselves instead of being led away by those 
 who seek merely to make political capital. 
 
 A. E. McPHILLIPS. 
 
 Mr. Bodwell has Not Done Himself Justice. 
 
 Mr. Bodwell has not done himself justice. He is a man of 
 great talent and of much originality, but, in his address on the 
 Manitoba School Question, instead of relying on his own re- 
 search and ability, he has contented himself with reproducing 
 the assertions of others, and, having relied upon their accuracy, 
 has involved himself in their untruths ; untruths which in the 
 place where originally uttered have been demonstrated time and 
 again. Here in Victoria they are comparatively new. 
 
No Originality in His Arguments, 
 
 Mr. Bodwell's address has not an original argument in it. 
 It is the RE-VAMPING and re-arranging of pamphlets issued upon 
 the subject by self-serving politicians whose aims and objects 
 have been exposed over and over again. 
 
 His Quotations from Privy Council Proceedings. 
 
 Mr. Bodwell's quotation from the proceedings of the Privy 
 Council appeared in the opposition newspaper two or three 
 weeks before he used it. No lawyer would, as an argument, 
 quote those proceedings as an authority for any proposition. 
 As a lawyer, Mr. Bodwell would refer to the judgment itself for 
 anything authentic. The verbal remarks of counsel and judges 
 during the argument, made for the purpose of elucidating and 
 leading up to the judgment, form no part of the judgment. 
 They are not quotations from the judgment. Often remarks 
 interspersed during the argument, are modified or withdrawn. 
 Those who have attended our Courts here have seen instances 
 of that. Mr. Bodwell professes to give us extracts from the 
 
 proceedings in order to show that all decided was 
 "that construing the Manitoba Act technically and strictly 
 *• according to its language, the Governor-General had jurisdic- 
 "tiontohear the petitioners" — "nothing more." The Privy 
 Council saying in effect; — " You must investigate the matter, 
 " and if you find that, as statesmen, a gross injustice has been 
 " c 2, which has no other remedy, then you can, if you choose 
 * e a remedy, but you are not bound to do so." 
 
 The words quoted are Mr. Bodwell's exact language. They 
 infer, in fact, state plainly, that the Privy Council do not find 
 the minority to have any grievance, but leave the Governor- 
 General in Council to find out whether there is a grievance, and 
 if so, to say whether they will remedy it, or not. How untruth- 
 ful this statement is, is at once shown by reference, not to the 
 skirmishing conversations, but to the judgment itself, which 
 Mr. Bodwell carefully leaves out of sight. 
 
 An Accurate Quotation From the Judgment. 
 
 Lord Herchell: — 
 
 '* Contrast the position of the Roman Catholics prior to and 
 " subsequent to the Acts from which they appeal. Before these 
 " passed into law there existed denominational schools of which 
 " the control and management were in the hands of the Roman 
 "Catholics, who could select the books to be used and deter- 
 " mine the character of the religious teaching. These schools 
 " received their proportionate share of the money contributed 
 " for school purposes out of the general taxation of the Pro- 
 
3 
 
 vince, and the money raised for these purposes by local assess- 
 ment was, so far as it fell upon Catholics, applied only to 
 Catholic schools. What is the position of the Roman Catho- 
 lic minority under the Acts of 1890? The schools of their 
 own denomination, conducted according to their views, will 
 rfceive no aid from the State. They must depend entirely 
 for their support upon the contributions of the Catholic com- 
 munity, while the taxes out of which the State aid is granted 
 to the schools provided for by the Statute, fall upon Catholics 
 and Protestants. Moreover, while the Catholic inhabitants 
 remain liable to local assessment for school purposes, the pro- 
 ceeds of the assessment are no longer destined to any extent 
 for the support of the Catholic schools, but afford the means 
 of maintaining schools which they regard as no more suitable 
 for the education of Catholic children than if they were of a 
 distinctly Protes^nt character." 
 
 Suppressed by Mr. Bodwell. 
 
 By suppressing all mention of the judgment of their Lord- 
 ships, Mr. Bodwell argues that the Government were not forced 
 to act. Saying that they were not forced to act means, of 
 course, that there was no peremptory, or valid reason shown 
 why, as honest interpreters of the Constitution, they should 
 act. In a physical sense the Government were not forced to 
 act. But, in a moral sense, they were bound to act when the 
 rights of the minority were shown to be affected, and that they 
 wereaffectf"', and how deeply, is shown by the above quotation, 
 and, as if 10 emphasize it, their Lordships go on to say : — 
 
 " In view of this comparison, it does not seem possible to 
 ** SAY THAT THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES of the Roman CathoHc 
 '* minority in relation to education which existed prior to 1890 
 *' have not been affected." 
 
 Rights and privileges then having found by the highest 
 tribunal in the land to have been affected, and injuriously 
 affected, by the Legislation complained of, the law speaks with 
 no uncertain sound. Here is what it says : — 
 
 Manitoba Act Sec. 22. '* In and for the province the said 
 " Legislature may exclusively make laws in relation to edu- 
 " cation, subject and according to the following provisions : — 
 
 " (i). Nothing in any such law shall prejudicially affect 
 " any right or privilege with respect to denominational schools 
 "which any class of persons have by law or practice in the 
 *' province at the Union : — 
 
 " (2). An appeal shall lie to the Governor-General in Coun- 
 " cil from any act or decision of the Legislature of the 
 
 ''ma^'i 
 
** Province, or of any provincial authority, affecting any right 
 "or privilege of the Protestant or Roman Catholic minority of 
 ** the Queen's subjects in relation to education." 
 
 " But, " says Mr. Bodwell," all that says is that the Govern- 
 *' ment were bound to hpar the appeal, not to grant any, and, as 
 '* matter of fact, they ought to have granted no relief, for the 
 •* schools before the Act were inefficient, and disioyalty incul- 
 " cated as one of the leading features of the separate school 
 *' system." 
 
 I will deal with the questions of inefficiency and disloyalty 
 in a moment, but first let me refer a moment to the contention 
 that with a just cause of appeal existing, the Governor in Coun- 
 cil was not forced to give effect to it. 
 
 Government not Forced to Giv^ Relief. 
 
 Such an assertion shocks every sense of morality and 
 honesty. It is the argument of the bandit and robber. 
 As well might you argue that although the law says 
 that it shall be lawful for a Court of Justice to restore to me 
 my watch which has been filched from me, and to punish the 
 marauder, yet the Court is not forced to do anything. It is only 
 lawful for them to do it, and they can do as they please, or as 
 policy dictates. That is Mr. Bodwell's argument in a nutshell. 
 But, as every honest man can see, the jurisdiction and duty of 
 hearing the appeal carries with it the imperative obligation also 
 to grant redress if the appeal is well founded, and that the 
 appeal is well founded, is declared by their Lordships in the 
 language above quoted, and by their express finding in apt 
 language, the appeal is well founded." 
 
 Then, following the decision that the rights of the minority 
 have been affected and that the appeal is well' founded ; their 
 Lordships go on to say : "It is not for this tribunal to inti- 
 *• mate the precise steps to be taken. Their general character 
 «' is sufficiently defined by the 3rd sub-section of the Manitoba 
 "Act." 
 
 Here is the 3rd sub-section which their Lordships thns 
 invoke : — 
 
 " (3.) In case any such Provincial Law, as from time to 
 *' time seems to the Governor-General in Council requisite for 
 *• the due execution of the provisions of this section is not made, 
 "or in case any decision of the Governor-General in Coun- 
 "cil on any appeal under this section is not duly executed 
 " by the proper Provincial Authority in that behalf, then, and 
 " in every such case, and as far only as the circumstances of 
 *' each case . require, the Parliament of Canada may make 
 
'• remedal laws for the due execution of the provisions of this 
 '* section, and of any decision of the Governor-General in Coun- 
 ** cil under this section." 
 
 No Occasion to Re-Enact the Statute of 1890. 
 
 Their Lordships then proceed: — ''It is certainly not 
 ESSENTIAL that the Statntes repealed by the Act of 1890 should 
 be re-enacted, or that the precise provisions of those Statutes 
 should again be made law. ■* * * ♦ ♦ ♦ 
 
 All legitimate ground for complaint would be removed if the 
 system was supplemented by provisions which would remove 
 the grievance upon which the appeal is founded, and if it 
 were modified so far as might be necessary to give effect to 
 those provisions." 
 
 Not Forced to Act. 
 
 Mr. Bod well : "Never let it be said again in the City of 
 " Victoria during this election that the Government were forced 
 "to act." (Cheers.) 
 
 Her Majesty's Judgment of the Privy Council: — "Her 
 Majesty having taken the said report in consideration was 
 pleased by and with the advice of Her Privy Council to ap- 
 prove thereof, and to order, as it is hereby ordered, that the 
 recommendations and directions therein contained be punc- 
 tually observed, obeyed and carried into effect, in each and 
 every particular — Whereof the Governor-General of the 
 Dominion of Canada for the time being, and all other persons 
 whom it may concern, are to take notice and govern them- 
 selves accordingly." 
 
 How does Mr. Bodwell's statement, and the judgment of 
 Her Majesty's Privy Council of England, agree ? 
 
 Inefficient Education. 
 
 Let us now look into the statement that it was established 
 beyond a doubt that the separate schools as means of education 
 were woefully deficient ; that the examinations set for teachers 
 were of such a character as not to require any of the peculiar 
 qualifications of a teacher, and it was also proved that the 
 characters of the teachers as students were not such as to give 
 any reasonable hope that that state of things would be remedied 
 in the future ; that a most deplorable state of illiteracy was 
 found amongst the people themselves ; that in very many cases 
 in petitions sent into the Legislature, more than half of the 
 signers were unable to write their names, and so on. 
 
 In the first place, if all this, and a great deal more, has, as 
 Mr. Bod well asserts, " been established beyond a doubt" it 
 
answers the suggestion said to have been made by the Provin- 
 cial Government but not in fact made " of a commission to 
 investigate the facts," for, apparently the investigation had 
 already been made. But, even assuming all to be as Mr. Bod- 
 well states, no reason is given for depriving. the minority of their 
 constitutional rights. If the schools were inefficient, reform 
 them, raise their standard and see it complied with. Mr. Bod- 
 well tells us that nothing short of a return to the system as it 
 existed before rSQo, would suit the Catholic minority, and that 
 the Remedial Order distinctly directs a return to that system. 
 Each of these statements is directly contrary to the fact. 
 
 No Church Control of Schools. 
 
 At the hearing of the Appeal before the Governor-General 
 in Council, Mr. Ewart, as Counsel for the Roman Catholic min- 
 ority, in addressing the Council, said : 
 
 '•They do not ask that their church should in any 
 ♦• way control the schools. They are perfectly willing 
 "to work up to any state prescribed standard of secu- 
 
 •* LAR instruction, TO BE SUBJECTED TO INSPECTION, AND TO 
 •' USE SCHOOL BOOKS NOT AT VARIANCE WITH THEIR RELIGIOUS 
 •• DOCTRINES." 
 
 In fact, as is well known, Catholics are perfectly willing to 
 be bound by, and are anxious to co-operate in every arrange- 
 ment necessary for the secular, if thought well, the compulsory 
 education, of children in Manitoba, All that they ask is that 
 they shall have the privilege of teaching religion — not to others 
 — but to their own children. This is a matter of conscience 
 with them — are not their conscientious convictions to be respect- 
 ed, when the constitution says they shall be so ? As for the 
 statement that the Remedial Order distinctly directs a return to 
 the system in force before 1890 — it does nothing of the kind ! 
 On the contrary the judgment says distinctly : "It is certainly 
 not essential that the Statutes repealed by the Act of 1890 should 
 be re-enacted, or that the precise provisions of these Statutes 
 should again be made law." 
 
 Mr. Bodwell says : 
 
 i( 
 
 It 
 
 IS A Question of 
 a question of expediency, one 
 
 Politics." 
 
 •* It is a question of expediency, one of debate between 
 ** two classes of people that are found in every province, those 
 *' who believe in secular education in the public school, and 
 '• those who do not ; and in the ordinary course of things, and 
 •' in accordance with the universal rule that governs British law, 
 •' this is pre-eminently a question in which the majority should 
 *♦ rule." 
 
I differ with him. This \h not a question of potiticH. It is 
 a question of constitutional ri^^ht, and of Kettled law, which says, 
 not that this question, which is one of conscience, shall be 
 decided by the majority, but that : (s. aa, ss. i.) 
 
 *' Nothing in any such law sha! prejudicially affect any right 
 " or privilege with respect to denominational schools which any 
 •• class of persons have by law or practice in the Province at the 
 ** union," and further if this provision is over-ridden there shall 
 be an appeal, not to the majority, but to the power, which is 
 bound to protect the pieanest subject — the Governor-General, 
 representing the Queen, in Council. 
 
 Apply Mr. Bodwell's argument to the Province of Quebec, 
 where the majority are Catholic, but where the Protestant min- 
 ority are protected by a section in the B. N. A. Act similar to 
 section 22 of the Mahitoba Act. Suppose the question to be 
 raised there of abolishing separate Protestant schools, and of 
 having but one system of Ct'*holic public school education. 
 Apply Mr. Bodwell's argument to that state of affairs : " It is a 
 •* question of expediency. One of debate between two classes 
 •' of people, those who believe in Catholic public education and 
 '• those who do not, and in accordance with the universal rule 
 •• that governs British law, that is pre-eminently a question in 
 *• which the msjority should rule." 
 
 What an enormity it would be in Quebec, that the parents 
 of every Protestant child must submit to hi? child 
 being indoctrinated with Roman Catholicism ! What a 
 hideous tyranny, and flagrant violation of the Constitu- 
 tion ! And yet the counterpart of such tyaanny and 
 violation of constitutional rights, Mr. Bodwell's argument 
 would inflict on the Catholic child in another province. What 
 in the Province of Quebec, would the Protestant father have to 
 say to Mr. Bodwell's further point . " There is nothing against 
 any denomination establishing and supporting their own de- 
 nominational schools, but they would receive no state aid." 
 The parent would ask, and with irresistible force, why was he 
 taxed to support Roman Catholic schools to which he could not 
 conscientiously send his child, and, as for establishing his own 
 denominational schools, why he had not the money to do so, 
 and pay taxes towards state schools as well. 
 
 Mr. Bodwell, and many others, would laugh to scorn the 
 possibility of such a state of things in Quebec. Why ? 
 Because Canadians of other provinces, and British subjects 
 everywhere, would rise en masse against it, and Quebec, too 
 weak to enforce such a system, would be alone in the struggle. 
 But to the honest mind, which does not proceed upon the prin- 
 
8 
 
 ciple of mere might constituting right, there would be nothing 
 more revolting in Quebec's tyrannical attempt to control 
 conscience by an invasion of constitutional right than in the 
 case of Manitoba. The mere fact that in the one case Catholic 
 rights were encroached upon, and in the other, Protestant, 
 would be no feature in the case. How, in the Quebec case, if 
 the Dominion interfered, would such cries sound as " Hands 
 
 off 
 &c. 
 
 Quebec " ? 
 &c. 
 
 No coercion"? "Let Quebec alone"? 
 
 WHERE THE COERCION COMES IN. 
 
 As Mr. Helmcken, Q.C., remarked the other evening, the 
 coercion is not of Manito'^a, but bv Manitoba of a minority 
 which is supposed to be weak ; but the Constitution is the pro- 
 tection of the minority. The majority require no constitution. 
 
 "'' Inefficiency Refuted. 
 
 But what truth is there in this charge of inefficiency ? I 
 will quote from an article by Mr. Ewart, Q.C., in the Toronto 
 Mail, of 15th June last. He says: "The charges of 
 " inefficiency brought against the former Catholic schools have 
 " been answered so often and so completely that nothing but a 
 " charitable attribution to the Manitoba Government of 
 " monomania can save frcSm very serious characterization its 
 " statement that * so far as we are aware there has never been 
 " an attempt made to defend these schools on their merits.' " 
 After referring to several of the more public refutations of in- 
 efficiency, the writer goes on to say : "In fact there has not 
 " been the slightest difficulty in answering all that has been put 
 " forward as charges of inefficiency. The allegations are of 
 "three kinds: (i). Those which are perfectly true, but also 
 " utterly irrelevant, and would be just as useful to prove the 
 "inefficiency of the sun to penetrate the walls of a dungeon. 
 " (2). Those which are specific, but untrue. (3). Those which 
 "are so general that they are rather villiiication than 
 •' allegation." 
 
 "Among those which are true, but irrevelant, the principal 
 one is that very many of the French half-breeds are illiterate. 
 In the United States where there are no separate schools, the 
 illiteracy amongst the civilized Indians, Chinese, Negroes, etc., 
 is so great that a separate column is made for them in the edu- 
 cational census. Is this an argument in favor of establishing 
 separate schools in the States ? Does it prove the inefficiency 
 of their system of education ? If not, why does the partial illi- 
 teracy of halt-breeds, who during their present generation were 
 roving bands of hunters, and whose mother tongue is Cree, 
 
 

 prove anything* against the Catholic schools in Manitoba ? Let 
 the Catholics be admired for the noble work they have done as 
 missionaries, instructors and civilizers among the nomads of the 
 prairies ; and not be traduced or their work belittled by dwel- 
 ling upon the fact that every nomad is not yet a scholar." 
 
 " Amongst the charges that are specific, but are untrue, is 
 the allegation that in these Catholic schools catechism is the 
 principal subject of instruction. At the close of my recent 
 lecture in Winnipeg I produced the time-tables from five Catho- 
 lic schools and asked everyone to see for himself the baselessness 
 of this charge. Further, I gave in the name of the Catholics, a 
 cordial invitation to all to visit the schools at any time they 
 wished. It is needless, perhaps, to add that although no one 
 came, the charge is still supposed to be so true as not only to be 
 unanswered, but to be wholly incapable of answer." 
 
 '* Another specific charge is that under the old system the 
 Catholics cooked their return so as to increase their share of 
 the taxes. This charge has now become a general one, for the 
 reason that upon the only occasion upon which it was made 
 specific, it was proved to be unttue, and that in the most satis- 
 factory way possibly, namely, by the finding of the Court of 
 Queen's Bench. The charge then was specific. It was made 
 as to the city of Winnipeg. It was proved to be false. Since 
 then it has become, as I say, general, and has taken to the 
 woods. " 
 
 "Another specific charge is that the examination of teachers 
 was a farce. This has been supported by quoting one out of 
 several papers set for a teacher's examination, and then speak, 
 ing of it as Mr. Armour does, as though it had been the only 
 one required to be answered. Mr. Armour should be more 
 careful." 
 
 " The general charges are, as I have said, rather vilifications 
 than allegations. To meet them one can do little more than ask 
 for particulars, and meanwhile give flat denial. At my recent 
 lecture I did all that was possible to remove misapprehension by 
 producing upon the platform for general inspection a large ex- 
 hibit of the ordinary work of the Catholic school children by 
 asking the audience to visit the schools, and by announcing the 
 fact that in one of the Winnipeg Catholic schools there were on 
 that day no fewer than 44 Protestant scholars, whose parents 
 would rather pay for the benefits of the "inefficiency" of a 
 Catholic school than partake of the excellence of the public 
 schools for nothing." 
 
 In Mr. Ewart's lecture, to which he refers, (given in the 
 Congregational Church of the City of Winnipeg), he remarks: — 
 
10 
 
 / 
 
 Perhaps the best means of ascertaining whether' the separate 
 schools system is injurious, is to ascertain how it works in 
 Ontario. There the supporters of both systems are much the 
 same, and the conditions are identical. How does it operate 
 there ? Are the separate schools there illiterate ? If you will 
 turn to the Canadian Statistical Year Book for 1894, at page 
 851, you will find the statement: ' The average attendances at 
 the separate schools were better than at the public schools, 
 being 57 per cent, of the total number of pupils, while the 
 average cost of a pupil, both on total attendance and on 
 average attendance, was less than the public schools.' " 
 
 Further Testimony Refuting Inefficiency. 
 
 Now, let me give another testimony, that of Capt. W. 
 Clarke, who, at the time he wrote the letter given below, was 
 the Manitoba representative at the Colonial and Indian Exhibi- 
 tion. Mr. Clarke is not a Catholic, nor has he any tendencies 
 toward Rome, but, through his daughters he acquired some 
 knowledge of a Catholic school in Manitoba, and so was pre- 
 pared to acknowledge without surprise the merit of their ex- 
 hibit. Read his testimony : — 
 
 London, 27th July, 1886. 
 
 '* Dear Sir, — I can speak with experience with reference to 
 ** the excellence of your section, two of my daughters having 
 '* been for a long time with the good sisters of St. Boniface, 
 '* where their progress was as satisfactory to me as it was plea- 
 ** sant to me," 
 
 " I am, sir, 
 
 " Your obedient servant, 
 
 " William Clarke." 
 
 "7'. A. Berm'er, jasg.^ Sup/, of Education.^' 
 
 Read also the testimony of Canada's Hlt;h Commissioner 
 in the same year (1886), long before the questions which now 
 rend society had arisen : 
 
 "Colonial and Indian Exhibition, i886. 
 "Canadian Section, 
 
 '• London, 29th June, 1896. 
 " To T. H. Bemier, Esq.: 
 
 "My Dear Sir, — I duly received your letter of the 3rd 
 " inst., and have to thank you for the memorandum which you 
 " have prepared on behalf of your section of the Manitoba 
 " Educational Exhibit. I shall be pleased to receive a thousand 
 
II 
 
 " copies of the memorandum and to see that they are carefully 
 " distributed. The exhibit which you have taken such pains to 
 " collect has already attracted considerable attention, and I do 
 " not doubt it will add to the success of the Dominion at the 
 *' Exhibition. 
 
 •♦ I remain, Yours faithfully, 
 
 " Charles TuppER. " 
 
 If you are not satisfied with such testimonies, listen to the 
 following remarks published in the "Canadian Gazette" of 
 London, on the 4th November, 1886 : 
 
 " It is generally believed that of all the sister provinces, 
 ** that of Manitoba is the least advanced towards civilizadon. 
 *' We already know, that in many respects, such is not the 
 *' case, but if we consider the excellent scholastic exhibition 
 **of that province, we see in what degree that impression is 
 *' erroneous, especially in the matter of education. 
 
 "The collection contains samples of books, exercises, 
 scholastic material, etc., etc, coming from the Catholic 
 SCHOOLS as well as from the Protestant schools of the 
 province. 
 
 '* The excellency of the work, and especially of the geogra- 
 phical charts is incontestible. This is the more pleasing, if 
 we consider the fact that many exhibits are dated from the 
 year 1884, and the beginning of the year 1885. It is evident 
 the exhibit is composed of the ordinary duties of the schools 
 in all parts of the province, and not of work specially pre- 
 pared for the occasion. 
 
 " No pretention has been made to eclipse the school exhib- 
 its of the other provinces, but the collection that is under our 
 eyes denotes that in one of the most recently ' organized ' 
 provinces of the Confederation, there exists a school 
 system, which although respecting the faith and religious 
 convictions of the population, offers to everyone an edu- 
 cation capable of fitting for the highest rank in the 
 society, thu child who is placed under its care." 
 
 What Patriotism Dictates. 
 
 Mr. Bodwell goes on to tell us of the purely anti-British 
 tendency of the teaching in the former Manitoba separate 
 schools. English not taught, and children ignorant of British 
 history and traditions and teaching being anti-British in every 
 sense of the word, and Mr. Bodwell closes with the following 
 peroration : — 
 
 <i 
 
 4( 
 
 4« 
 H 
 «« 
 << 
 II 
 II 
 
 II 
 II 
 II 
 II 
 «l 
 41 
 *t 
 
la 
 
 t4 
 l< 
 
 <i 
 i< 
 <( 
 (( 
 (( 
 i< 
 4t 
 <i 
 (» 
 (I 
 t< 
 << 
 l< 
 
 , Mr. Bodwell's Peoration. 
 
 *' Will Col. Prior force on the people of Manitoba a system 
 which will leave a large part of the population ignorant of the 
 glories and achievements of British arms in the past. To 
 whom the names of Waterloo and Balaclava will be unmean- 
 ing terms ; who will never hear of the relief of Lucknow, or 
 the glorious day of Alma. Whose pulses will never be stirred 
 by the heroism of Wolfe, or the reckless daring of Brock. 
 How, step by step, under the growth of British institutions, 
 often amid tears of privation and bloodshed, the divine right 
 of kings was made' subordinate to the greater rights of the 
 people. Of the United Empire Loyalists, of their struggles 
 and adherence to the British Crown, and how, out of the 
 ilames and ashes of that bitter martyrdom there has arisen in 
 this Canada of ours a system of constitutional rights, or edu- 
 cational privileges, of freedom of thought, and liberty of con- 
 science, which is to-day the admiration of the world." 
 
 All this highly inflammatory material from a gentleman 
 who assures us "we make no appeals to passion," demon- 
 strates to the intelligent listener, who has just heard this display 
 of fireworks, that an endeavor to appeal to the passions of the 
 uninformed is exactly what the speaker is attempting. The 
 reference to constitutional rights and educational privileges from 
 one who is appealing to the blind passions and prejudices of his 
 hearers to ride roughshod over these very constitutional rights 
 and educational privileges, is a sad commentary on the con- 
 sistency of the human mind. This gentleman must have im- 
 bibed the principles of Mr. Templeman, when in a moment of 
 disappointment at losing his election five years ago, he an- 
 nounced his opinion that the public were no longer to be swayed 
 by reason, but practiced only only by the methods of the bunco 
 steerer. Are these the methods now to be employed in this 
 campaign, in the absence of legitimate subjects for appeals to 
 reason ? Why is it that all the broad principles of Liberalism, 
 " Free trade as they have it in England." " Tariff for revenue 
 only," and so on, are almost entirely given the go-by in this con- 
 test, and all efforts centred on a cry which can only have the 
 effect of sowing religious hate and bigotry ? 
 
 What is the use of this outcry for Provincial rights, and 
 against French domination, when, in reference to the Jesuits 
 Estates Act, these people, with Dalton McCarthy at their head, 
 were prepared to over-ride every Provincial right ; and, in the 
 Riel case, headed by Laurier, were prepared to rend the Do- 
 minion in shreds, so as to gain sympat|iy and support from a 
 horde who objected to the righteous punishment of a French 
 Rebel ? 
 
13 
 
 Disloyalty in Teaching. 
 
 Now, as to " Disloyalty in Teaching," and neglect of Eng- 
 lish History, the obvious answer is, that given to the charge of 
 inefficiency. If it exists, let the Government remedy it ; they 
 are responsible for the proper conduct of the schools, whether 
 denominational or secular. As pointed out before, the Church 
 does not ask to control the schools, and the Catholics are per- 
 fectly willing to work up to any State prescribed standard of 
 instruction, to be subject to inspection, and to use school books 
 not at variance with their religious doctrines. 
 
 What more can be asked than this, even if all Mr. Bodwell's 
 appeal to prejudice and passion is true. But that it is not true, 
 but wholly false, is demonstrated by the fact that no proof of 
 anything of the kind was offered by the Manitoba Government 
 during the four days when their case was argued before the 
 Dominion Government by Dalton McCarthy, nor has th^re been 
 any proof offered since then by the government, or by any one 
 else. There is not the remotest truth in it. 
 
 THE BILL OF RIGHTS. 
 
 Mr. Bodwell says that in the original Bill of Rights which 
 preceded Confederation no mention is made of separate schools, 
 and therefore, he argues. Catholics are not entitled to them. 
 
 But Mr. BOdwell's premises do not warrant his conclusion . 
 Regarding the Bill of Rights he tells us that a "great public 
 " meeting was held and delegates appointed to draw up a Bill 
 " of Rights, which was afterwards sent to Ottawa, and which 
 •' formed the foundation of the compact by which Manitoba 
 *' afterwards came into Confederation. In that Bill of Rights, 
 '* from beginning to end, there was no mention of separate 
 "schools." 
 
 Assuming what Mr. Bodwell says to be the fact, what has 
 it to do with the case ? The so-called " Bill of Rights " was 
 but a preliminary draft of what afterwards was formulated as 
 the "Manitoba Act," and it is idle to speculate on what may, 
 or may not have been 'eft out of the draft. The thing which 
 speaks is the Act of Parliament, finally assented to by all 
 parties: Confirmed by the British Parliament: Worked under for 
 20 years, and unques*^ioned in any way until now. The Manitoba 
 Act is perfectly clear on the subject of denominationol schools, 
 clearer even than the British North America Act which applies 
 to Ontario and Quebec, and which protects separate schools 
 
 ONLY WHEN ESTABLISHED BY LAW BEFORE OR SINCE THE UnION, 
 
 whereas the Manitoba Act recognizes those established either 
 by law OR practice. 
 
14 
 
 As a matter of fact there were pour bills of rights for 
 MANITOBA, formulated before the Manitoba Act. The point of 
 genuineness turns only upon the fourth Bill of Rights, which, 
 even if it could be proved a forgery, would not alter the case. 
 At least, the second and third Bills of Rights contained distinct 
 protection of the rights and privileges of the people in regard 
 to schools before Confederation. 
 
 So, even without the fourth bill over which dispute as to 
 genuineness has arisen, it is perfectly clear that all existing edu- 
 cational rights and privileges were to be respected. But as 
 pointed out before, the question is not, what was contained in 
 in either of the Bill of Rights, which have all, long since passed 
 out of existence, but what is contained now, in the constitution, 
 "The Manitoba Act," 
 
 " Hands off Manitoba. What is Manitoba's case to- 
 -day MAY BE British Columbia's case to-morrow." 
 
 This loud sounding, but hollow cry, was not made use of 
 by Mr. Bodwell, but is a favorite one with some other speakers. 
 It is utterly misleading. 
 
 The constitution and circumstances applicable to British Co- 
 lumbia are entirely different from Manitoba. The Manitoba Act 
 does not apply to us. With us, the only Constitutional pro- 
 vision in relation to denominational or separate schools, is sec- 
 tion 93 of the British North America Act. 
 
 93. In and for the province the Legislature may exclusively 
 make laws in relation to education, subject and according to the 
 following provisions : 
 
 (i). Nothing in any such law shall prejudically affect any 
 right or privilege which any class of persons have by law in 
 
 THE province AT THE UNION. 
 
 {3). Where in any province a system of separate or dissen- 
 tient schools exists by law at the union, or is thereafter 
 
 ESTABLISHED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE PROVINCE, an appeal 
 
 shall lie to the Governor-General in Council from any act or 
 decision of any provincial authority affecting any right or privi- 
 lege of the Protestant or Roman J^Catholic minority of the 
 Queen's subjects, in relation to education. 
 
 The Union consummated by the B. N. A. Act wasjonly of 
 Upper and Lower Canada, now known as Ontario and Quebec, 
 and of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, and the only privileges 
 in respect of separate schools to be respected, were "those 
 " EXISTING BY LAW AT THE UNION, or thereafter established by 
 " the legislature of the province." 
 
>5 
 
 Can be no Separate Scho'^i.s in British Columbia. 
 
 Some five or six years after the Union, the question arose 
 in New Brunswick, whether the Catholics were entitled to 
 separate schools, and the question was litigated, first in the 
 Supreme Court of the province, and afterwards in the Privy 
 Council in Enp-land, and both tribuuals arrived at the same 
 conclusion, wuich was that no such right existed under the 
 sections of the British North American Act above quoted. The 
 Catholics in vain pointed to the separate schools which had "by 
 practice " existed in New Brunswick before Confederation. 
 The Courts said, " That will not do. You must have them not 
 *• 'by practice' but by law," and in order to have them by law, 
 they must exist by " positive legal enactement ;" 
 
 And, as there was no "positive legal enactment" at the 
 Union, or by the Local Legislature since the Union, establish- 
 ing separate schools, the Catholics lost their case and were held 
 to be entitled to no privilege of separate schools. New Bruns- 
 wick's CASE is precisely THAT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. 
 
 British Columbia had no separate schools or denominational 
 privileges whatever before Confederation. It has established 
 none itself since, and hence no question whatever of Dominion 
 Legislation or interference, upon the subject, can possibly arise. 
 And, as for separate schools in other Provinces, in which they 
 are established by law, or which have adopted them voluntarily, 
 that is none of British Columbia's concern, and there is no reason 
 whatever why any such mischievous, venomous question shouH 
 be imported into polilics here, where we have hitherto been free 
 of It, and ALL creeds and denominations live happily 
 together. 
 
 They get along together also in Ontario and Quebec where 
 they have separate schools, giving a system of education second 
 to none in the world, and so they would in Manitoba, if it were 
 not that the busy-bodies set people by the ears. Don't let them 
 do the same thing in British Columbia. Mr. Martin told the 
 people at New Westminster the other day that the issue of this 
 election is not whether British Columbia or Victoria was to 
 have Cabinet representation, but whether separate schools are 
 to be re-establislicd in Manitoba. There is no such issue 
 
 here. 
 
 LET MR. MARTIN KNOW IT. 
 
 A. E. McPhillips.