-,%. 
 
 
 '-T^..^. 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 // 
 
 
 'VA 
 
 /. 
 
 i/. 
 
 i/. 
 
 1.0 
 
 1.1 
 
 1.25 
 
 2.5 
 2.2 
 
 IA£|28 I 
 
 ■ 30 l™^ ■ 
 
 i/- IIIIIM 
 
 MUi. 
 
 U III 1.6 
 
 
 
 
 
 A" 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 Hiotograiiiic 
 
 Sdences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WIST MAIN STRUT 
 
 WUSTIR.N.Y. 14SM 
 
 (716)t72-4S03 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Tachnical and Bibliographic Notaa/Nota* tachniquaa at bibliographiquaa 
 
 Tl 
 U 
 
 Tha Instltuta has attamptad to obtain tha bast 
 original copy availabia for filming. Faaturas of this 
 copy which may ba bibliographically uniqua. 
 which may altar any of tha imagas in tha 
 raproduction, or which may significantly changa 
 tha usual mathod of filming, ara chackad balow. 
 
 G 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Colourad covers/ 
 Couvertura de coulaur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 Couverture endommag^e 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur6a et/ou pellicul6e 
 
 I I Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 I I Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographtquas en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre qua blaue ou noire) 
 
 I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Relii avec d'autras documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serrie peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intirieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within tha text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutias 
 tors d'une restauration apparaissent dans la texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pagaa n'ont 
 pas 6ti filmias. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires supplAmantairas; 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm* le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 4tA possible de se procurer. Les details 
 da cat exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modlficstinn dans la m^thoda normale de filmage 
 sont indiquis ci-dessous. 
 
 r~n Coloured pages/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagias 
 
 Pages restored and/oi 
 
 Pages restaur^es et/ou pelliculdes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxe( 
 Pages dicoior^es. tachetdes ou piqudes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages ddtachdes 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Qualiti in6gale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materii 
 Comprend du materiel supplimentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Mition disponible 
 
 I I Pages damaged/ 
 
 r~1 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 I I Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 I I Pages detached/ 
 
 r~3k Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 I I Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 I I Only edition available/ 
 
 Tl 
 
 P' 
 01 
 fil 
 
 O 
 b< 
 tt 
 si 
 01 
 fil 
 si 
 01 
 
 Tl 
 
 s^ 
 
 Tl 
 
 M 
 di 
 er 
 be 
 
 rit 
 re 
 m 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalament ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont M filmies d nouveau de fapon d 
 obtenir la meilieure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at tha reduction ratio chackad below/ 
 
 Ce document est film* au taux da reduction indiqu* ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 y 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here hen been reproduced thenkt 
 to the generoeity of: 
 
 Thomas Fishsr Rara Book Library, 
 Univarsity of Toronto Library 
 
 L'exempieire film* fut reproduit grAce A la 
 gAnirositA de: 
 
 Thomas Fishar Rara Book Library, 
 Univarsity of Toronto Library 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded frcme on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol — »> (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 IVIaps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method. - 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t4 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin. compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la netteti de I'exemplaire filmA, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimte sont filmte en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 derniAre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont filmte en commenpant par la 
 pr-omlAre page qui comporte una empreinte 
 d impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un dee symboles suivants apparaftra sur la 
 dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbols —► signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 filmAs A des taux de reduction diff6rents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul clichA, 11 est filmA A partir 
 de I'angle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite, 
 et de haut en bee, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mAthode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
"SAVING I^'AITH." 
 
By the same Author. 
 
 AN EXPOSITION OF THE NINTH CHAPTER OF PAUL'S 
 
 EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. 
 
 Demy 8vo. Out of print. 
 
 A CRITICAL EXPOSITION OP THE THIRD CHAPTER 
 
 OF PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. 
 
 Demy 8vo. Price 12s. 6d. 
 
 A COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL ACCORDING 
 
 TO MATTHEW. 
 
 DemySvo. Price Us. 
 
 A COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL ACCORDING 
 
 TO MARK. 
 DemySvo. Price 12s. 
 
 BIBLICAL HELP TOWARDS HOLINESS IN LIVING 
 
 AND HAPPINESS IN DYING. 
 
 Foolscap 8vo. Price 2s. 6d. 
 
 THE EXTENT OF THE ATONEMENT. 
 
 Foolscap Svo. Price 2s. 6d. 
 
 A COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF RUTH. 
 Royal Svo. Price 5s. 
 
ITheoV 
 
 *« CI 
 
 SAVING FAITH" 
 
 OR 
 
 THE FAITH 
 
 BY WHICH THE SINNER 
 
 IS CONSCIOUSLY UNITED TO THE SAVIOUR 
 
 PRACTICALLY CONSIDERED 
 
 BY 
 
 JAMES MORISON, D. D. 
 
 Ninth Edition 
 
 TORONTO, CANADA: 
 
 S. R. BRIGGS, 
 
 %ovonto gaillarb %xnct l^pasitarg, 
 
 COR. YONGE AND TEMPERANCE STREETS. 
 
 1886. 
 
% 
 
PREFACE TO NINTH EDITION. 
 
 The first edition of the following work 
 was published ir 1842. In the Prefa- 
 tory Note to that edition, it was said, — 
 The following pages have been written 
 at mere snatches of time saved from the 
 vast multiplicity of engagements devolv- 
 " ing upon me in thtj midst of a quid yet 
 " extensive revival of religion. When the 
 " reader reflects that the writer, in addi- 
 " tion to the usual pastoral duties of his 
 " office, has, within the last year, con- 
 " versed again and again with many 
 " hundreds of * anxious inquirers,' ear- 
 nestly seeking salvation, he will not look 
 for a perfect or a polished production. 
 " Indeed, polish has not been aimed at : 
 the point and power of plainness are 
 all that have been attempted." 
 
 « 
 
 (( 
 
 u 
 
 <( 
 
 K 
 
 « 
 
 <( 
 
fe 
 
 Yi 
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 In succeeding editions the greater part 
 of the work was rewritten, — but, as 
 far as possible, on the old model. The 
 changes introduced were not so much due 
 to creation as to growth. 
 
 It has been a heartfelt joy to the author, 
 to know that his little Work, in all its pre- 
 vious editions, has been useful. He trusts 
 that it will still have a * mission,* and do 
 * good/ 
 
 The Book, at one tijne, had been out 
 of print for more than twenty years, the 
 author not having sufficient leisure for 
 revisal. He was at length however able, 
 during a brief holiday in the country, to 
 recast what seemed to require remould- 
 ins ; and now he has the joy of sending 
 
 'o > 
 
 it forth anew on its evangelistic ministry. 
 
 Florentine Bank Housr, Glasgow, 
 Ut December, 1885. 
 
 
 tJ' 
 
 M 
 
 ;or .ii.< 
 
 :• J-: ,'' lirA ' vH.' 
 
/ 
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 Taoe. 
 
 Introductory, ^ 
 
 Saving Faith is Believing, ..11 
 
 Believing a kind of thinking, 13 
 
 Faith and Knowledge, 17 
 
 Faith and Trust, 22 
 
 The transcendent importance of the Object of 
 
 faith, 31 
 
 The Object of saving faith twofold, .... 35 
 The immediate and primary Object of saving 
 
 faith 36 
 
 The mediate and ultimate Object of saving faith, 41 
 Believing * on ' or * in ' the Saviour, . . . .45 
 
 Degrees of Faith, 49 
 
 Living Faith and Dead Faith, 64 
 
 Believing with the heart, 61 
 
 ♦ By ' faith, and * through ' faith, but not * for* 
 
 faith 64 
 
viii CONTENTS, 
 
 Paoi: 
 
 Faith the Gift of God, 65 
 
 Help mine unbelief, 69 
 
 Christ the Leader and Finisher of faith, , . 71 
 
 Faith "the substance of things hoped for," . 81 
 
 Faith *' the evidence of things not seen," . 96 
 
 No fear of believing the right thing in a 
 
 wrong way, 98 
 
 Trying to believe 102 
 
 Saving Faith the Reception of the Testimony 
 
 of God, 104 
 
 Setting to the seal that God is true, . . . 109 
 
 Faith a kind of hearing and seeing, . . . Ill 
 
 Belief of the Gospel not a peculiar kind of 
 
 believing, 116 
 
 Appropriating Faith, 123 
 
 The Life of Faith, 129 
 
 The Eflfects of Faith, 133 
 
 Is Saving Faith a possibility to heathens ? . 139 
 
 The connection between Faith and Faithful- 
 ness, 143 
 
 The word Faith in the Old Testament, . . 147 
 
 The word Faith in the New Testament, . . 148 
 
 
I 
 
 'SAVING FAITH." 
 
 INTRODUCTORY. 
 
 There are few words of greater interest 
 to beings needing salvation than the word 
 faith. The writer of the Epistle to the 
 Hebrews tells us that " without faith it 
 is impossible to please God " (xi, 6). If 
 any man is "saved," it is, says Paul, 
 " through faith." (Eph. ii. 8.) The apos- 
 tolic answer to the most important ques- 
 tion that ever was or ever will be put is 
 this, — " Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, 
 and thou shalt be saved." (Acts xvi. 31.) 
 "He that helieveth on me," says the 
 blessed Saviour himself, " hath everlasting 
 " life." (John vi, 47.) He says again, " He 
 that helieveth not is condemned already, 
 
 a2 
 
10 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 because he hath not believed in the name 
 of the only begotten Son of God." (John 
 iii, 1 8.) It must, then, be of the greatest 
 moment to be possessed of faith, — faith 
 in the Lord Jesus Christ. 
 
 What is this indispensable faith ? 
 How is it to be distinguished from other 
 mental acts or states ? 
 
 Faith, in itself considered, is simple. 
 It must Le so. It is a thing for " little 
 children." (Matt, xviii, 3.) It is for 
 "every creature." (Mark xvi, 15.) The 
 most illiterate of men, as well as the 
 wisest and most cultured, have to do with 
 it. (Eom. i, 14.) It is expected from the 
 poor jailers (Acts xvi. 31) and the "poor 
 Josephs " of the human race, as well as 
 from its Bacons and Newtons. It must 
 be a simple thin^. And if therefore any 
 reader has been perplexed on the subject, 
 as if it were some great mystery, which 
 only few could understand, we would 
 fraternally ask him to come with :^s, that 
 we may together search out " what saith 
 
 i 
 
SAVING FAITH IS BELIEVING. 11 
 
 the Lord" regarding it. Surely "the 
 way of holiness" will be opened up to 
 those who are willing to walk in it. And 
 we may reasonably hope that it will be 
 so plain, that " the wayfaring men," how- 
 ever inexperienced, need not " err therein.'* 
 (Isai. XXXV, 8.) 
 
 SAVING FAITH IS BELIEVING, 
 
 It is misleading to suppose that there 
 is some peculiar sacredness and solemnity 
 inherent in the word faith, which is not 
 inherent in the word believing. Some 
 seem to have the idea that the two terms 
 are quite distinct in their import. But 
 it is not so. There is only one word, in 
 the original language of the New Testa- 
 ment, for both faith and believing. The 
 term which is rendered faith in Ephesians 
 ii, 8, " by grace ye are saved through 
 "faith," is the same that is rendered 
 belief in 2 Thessalonians ii, 13, "God 
 
12 
 
 ** SAVING FAITH." 
 
 '' hath from the beginning chosen you to 
 " salvation, through sanctifieation of the 
 " Spirit and belief of the truth." The 
 identity of the two terms is seen too in 
 Hebrews xi, 6, " Without faith it is im- 
 ** possible to please God ; for he that 
 " Cometh to God must believe that he is, 
 " and that he is the re warder of them 
 "that diligently seek him." 
 
 Our English language is a conglomer- 
 ate tongue, embodying, in particular, a 
 remarkable intermixture of Saxon and 
 Latin ingredients. Hence it not infre- 
 quently happens that t possesses two 
 distinct terms of identical import, though 
 varying somewhat, it may be, in conven- 
 tional application. These are synonyms. 
 The word celestial, for example, is really 
 identical in import with the word heavenly/. 
 And the words terrestrial and earthly, in 
 like manner, are synonyms. They are 
 not, it is true, identically applied in ordi- 
 nary usage. They have, happily, estab- 
 lished for themselves certain specialties 
 
BELIEVING A KIND OF THINKING, 13 
 
 of application, and thus our language is 
 idiomatically enriched. But when we 
 wish to represent the really differentiat- 
 ing import of either of the terms, we find 
 it impossible to distinguish the two. The 
 one is a perfect explanation of the other. 
 The same is the case with faith and 
 "belief. The former is originally a Latin 
 word, and the latter is Saxon. But both 
 are accurate renderings of the one Greek 
 term employed in the New Testament, 
 And hence a very noticeable phenomenon, 
 — there is only the one verb to believe 
 corresponding ttD both the nouas. He 
 who has faith, therefore, is simply he who 
 believes. And a Confession of Faith is 
 simply the Confession of belief It is a 
 Creed, 
 
 in 
 
 BELIEVING A KIND OF THINKING, 
 
 ' Believing is not a kind of feeling. 
 Neither is it a kind of willing. It is a 
 kind of thinking. " The understanding/' 
 
u 
 
 tt 
 
 SAVING FAITH. 
 
 » 
 
 — as James Fraser of Brea expressed it, 
 in his Treatise concerning Justifying or 
 Saving Faith, written by him while " a 
 " prisoner for Christ in the Bass Kock," 
 — " is the proper and immediate subject 
 " of faith." (Vol. i, p. 175.) When we be- 
 lieve that there is a God, we do not feel 
 that there is. Neither do we will that 
 there shall be. We think that there is : 
 and we think that there is, because we 
 have reason for entertaining such a 
 thought. When we believe that there is 
 a land called Australia, we do not feel 
 that there is ; and we do not choose that 
 there shall be. We think that there is : 
 and we think that there is, because we 
 have evidence to satisfy us that there is 
 such a country. When we believe that 
 Abraham was the father of the Israelites, 
 we do not feel that he was. We do not 
 will or choose that he should be. We 
 think that he was: and we think that 
 he was, because we have evidence to 
 satisfy us that he was. When we take 
 
BELIEVING A KIND OF THINKING. 15 
 
 money to the bank, and lodge it for 
 a period, we have faith that we shall 
 get interest for it, and that we shall 
 get it back, whenever we may wish 
 to have it. We "believe that we shall 
 get interest ; and we believe that we 
 can get back the entire sum. What 
 is this believing or faith ? It is, as- 
 suredly, neither feeling nor \Hlling. We 
 do not feel that we shall get interest; 
 and though we choose or will to get 
 it, yet our choice or will is founded 
 on our believing or faith, and is thus 
 not the believing or faith itself. When 
 we believe that we shall get interest, 
 and both interest and capital as soon 
 as we wish to have both, we just 
 think that we shall get interest, and 
 our capital too ; and we have this thought 
 because we have evidence that satisfies us 
 that the bank is worthy of being trusted, — 
 of being entrusted with our money. The 
 bank's credit is good with us. The bank 
 commands credit in the money market. 
 
16 
 
 "SAVING FAITU:\ 
 
 h 
 
 ; 
 
 H 
 
 ■ 
 
 Believing, then, is a kind of thinking , 
 though not the same kind of thinking as 
 that by which we demonstrate a mathe- 
 matical proposition, or that by which we 
 obstrve the facts of science, or that by 
 which we weave a web of imagination. 
 It is that kind of thinking which is 
 founded upon evidence. It is a permasion 
 of the mind. 
 
 It is assuredly of great moment that 
 men should bear in mind that, when they 
 are called upon to believe in the Lord 
 Jesus Christ in order to salvation, it is 
 thinking that is needed. It is our thoughts 
 of things that ultimately rule us. It is 
 thought that rules the world. 
 
 If, then, men would believe in God, — 
 they must think, and think the right 
 thought about God. In thus thinking, 
 they do believe in God, and will become, in 
 their moral character, men of good faith. 
 Their thought about God will rule them. 
 Being right thought, it will rule them 
 rightly. And so, if men would believe 
 
FAITH AND KNOWLEDGE. 
 
 17 
 
 in the Lord Jesus Christ, they must think, 
 — and think the right thought about him. 
 They must think the Holy Spirit's thought. 
 And if they do, their thought will be not 
 simply /<xi^A, — it will be good faith, and 
 they will hence become, in their moral 
 character, persons of good faith. If they 
 be full of faith, it will be reasonably ex- 
 pected that they shall be found faithful 
 in all their relations. 
 
 FAITH AND KNOWLEDGE. 
 
 Saving Faith is a kind of knowledge. 
 This is rendered evident by what our 
 Saviour says in John xvii, 3, " This is 
 "life eternal, that they might know thee, 
 '' tJie only true God, and Jesus Christ 
 " tvhom thou hast sent." " Life eternal " 
 is the gift of God. (Kom. vi, 23.) It is 
 the gift of God to men. (1 John v, 11.) 
 It is given that men may know the only 
 trite God, and Jesiis Christ whom he has 
 
18 
 
 "SAVING FAITH," 
 
 I 
 
 sent, (John, xvii, 3.) And hence when 
 men come to this knowledge, they have 
 eternal life, and shall " never die." (John 
 xi, 26.) They may drop the body ; and 
 eyes that have fondly looked on them 
 here, may for a season see them no more. 
 Hands that have fondly pressed them 
 may touch them no more. But they 
 shall " never die." Their death will be 
 no death. It will be death without its 
 deadly element, — death without its 
 " sting." How glorious ! And all this 
 is to be attained by knowing God and 
 Christ 
 
 Hence we read in 1 Timothy ii, 4, that 
 God " will have all men to be saved, and 
 " to come unto the knowledge of the truth** 
 The last clause informs us how the first 
 is to be accomplished. Men are to be 
 saved, by coming to the knowledge of the 
 truth. As soon as any come to the know- 
 ledge of the truth, they enter into the en- 
 joyment of salvation. " They that know 
 " thy name" says the Psalmist, "• will put 
 
FAITH AND KNOWLEDGE, 
 
 19 
 
 when 
 have 
 John 
 and 
 them 
 more, 
 them 
 they 
 ill be 
 It its 
 its 
 . this 
 and 
 
 , that 
 , and 
 uthr 
 
 first 
 be 
 fthe 
 noW' 
 
 en- 
 :now 
 
 " their trust in thee." (Psalm ix, 1 0.) 
 And if any do not put their trust in God, 
 it is because they are " alienated from 
 " the life of God, through the ignorance 
 " that is in them." (Ephes. iv, 1 8.) They 
 " are destroyed for lack of knowledge" — 
 " because they have rejected knowledge." 
 (Hos. iv, 6.) " Israel doth not know," 
 says God, " my people doth not consider." 
 (Isaiah i, 3.) There are very many who 
 are " laden with sins, and led away with 
 " divers lusts," and who are " ever learn- 
 " ing" and yet " never able to come to the 
 " knowledge of the truth." (2 Tim. iii, 6, 
 7.) For this reason they remain un- 
 saved. 
 
 It is obvious, then, that saving faith is 
 a kind of knowledge. It is thinking that 
 corresponds to the reality of the thing 
 which is the glorious object of the thought. 
 He who thinks the right thought regard- 
 ing God and Christ, as God and Christ 
 stand related, in the scheme of mercy, to 
 sinners, knows the truth of truths. He 
 
20 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' I \ 
 
 is a l)eliever of the glorious Gospel, and 
 has eternal life. ' • ^ 
 
 Men often distinguish between faith 
 and knowledge ; but not always happily. 
 Tliere are indeed certain liinds of know- 
 ledge which could not be called faith. 
 AVhatsoever we know directly and intui- 
 tively, we do not believe. Friedrich H. 
 Jacobi called such knowledge faith ; ^ but 
 unhappily. We need to know that we 
 iiiay believe. Although it is also true 
 that there is a sphere of things in which 
 we need to believe that we may know. 
 But we do not believe that we exi^t. 
 We know that we do. We do not be- 
 lieve that we see, and hear, and smell, 
 and taste, and touch : we know that we 
 do. We do not believe that we are self- 
 conscious: we know that we are. We 
 do not believe that twice one is two : we 
 know that 1 + 1 is 2. But we may 
 either know by demonstration on the one 
 hand, or believe through credible testi- 
 
 ^ See, especially, his Idealismus and ReaUamua. 
 
FAITH AND KNOWLEDilE. 
 
 21 
 
 mony on the other, that the three angles 
 uf a triangle are equal to two riglit angles. 
 We may either know, or simply believe, 
 that the earth is round, and that the sun 
 is larger than the earth. We may either 
 know or simply believe that there is a 
 God. No man knows directly that there 
 is. He ascends to the knowledge. He 
 starts from some other knowledge, and 
 thence rises up, as on a ladder, to see. 
 He ascends, as Des Cartes beautifully 
 shows, ^ from his own consciousness. It 
 is there that he finds his first foothold. 
 Our knowledge of God is thus mediate ; 
 and hence it may be merely faith. We 
 " believe in God." " We believe that 
 " God is." (Heb. xi, 6.) But the steps 
 by which the higher i^iinds climb to this 
 conclusion are so real, — they so incontro- 
 vertibly lead to it, — that the conclusion 
 is an object of the highest possible subjec- 
 tive certainty. They * know' that God is. 
 When once we not only know that 
 
 * Discours de la M^thode. 
 
22 
 
 ** SAVING FAITH.'* 
 
 Ood is, but also know that he has re- 
 vealed himself in the volume of the Book, 
 and in the glorious Gospel of his grace — 
 us the central and all-pervading theme 
 of the volume of the Book, — then our 
 faith in the glorious object of the Gospel 
 may be most legitimately represented as 
 a kind of knowledge. Although faith in 
 some cases, may be only the certainty of 
 ignorance ; yet in other cases, and em- 
 phatically in the case before us, it may 
 be, and should be, and often is, the cer- 
 tainty of true knowledge. 
 
 FAITH AND TRUST. 
 
 There is an intimate connection be- 
 tween faith and trust. The connection 
 is so intimate that the Greek term which 
 is rendered faith and belief in the New 
 Testament, is very frequently in the 
 classics employed to denote trust. " Every 
 *' reader of Greek knows," says Julius 
 
FAITH AND TRUST. 
 
 23 
 
 Charles Hare, " that the leading idea of 
 " the Greek word is that of confidence^ of 
 " reliance, of tntst." ( Victory of Faithy }). 
 18.) Luther and Melancthon constantly 
 reproduce this import of the word. With 
 them, as with Marshall the author of tlir 
 Gospel' Mystery of Sanctification, and 
 Bishop O'Brien, and many others, faith is 
 in a great mf;asure "trust." (Fides d 
 fiducia.) 
 
 We make no question that one could 
 preach the Gospel for years, and success- 
 fully too, though merging out of view the 
 word faith or belief and substituting in 
 its room the word trust Faith would 
 always be implied, and the object or objects 
 of faith would need to be carefully ex- 
 hibited ; but the word * faith * might be 
 dispensed with. 
 
 If the sinner really trust to the Saviour, 
 or tr^ist in the Saviour, or trust the 
 Saviour, it will be well with him. 
 
 We have a lively remembrance of 
 hearing Dr. Chalmers illustrating to the 
 
•fw 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 Scottish mind, the part which the sinner 
 has to act in coming to the Saviour. " He 
 "has just to come," said the Doctor, 
 " with all his sins about him, and ' lippen * 
 " to the Saviour" If he do really lipjpen, 
 that is, if he trust, he will have peace. 
 He will have joy. He will have lively 
 hope. And his spiritual contact with the 
 great object of his trust will inspire him 
 with a spirit of admiration and adoration. 
 He will love the Lord his God with all 
 his heart and soul and mind and strength. 
 He will " follow holiness, without which 
 " no man shall see the Lord," and with 
 which every man would be meet to be 
 for ever in the glorious presence of the 
 Lord. 
 
 We have read of a father who had oc- 
 casion to be in a dark vault undr^rneath 
 his house, into which he entered by a 
 trap-door. While he was groping below, 
 his little daughter, who had been in quest 
 of him, came and called out. Father, 
 Father, wlure are ymi .^ 
 
FAITH AND TRUST. 
 
 25 
 
 " I am down here," he replied. 
 
 She leaned over the edge of the aper- 
 ture, but could not see anything. It was 
 pitchy dark. But she had heard her 
 father's voice, and she suddenly said, Let 
 iiu come dovm beside you. 
 
 Her father, looking up, saw her clearly 
 against the light, as, bending over, she 
 gazed into the darkness. He said to her, 
 Just drop down, and ' lipjpen ' to me ; I 
 will catch you in my arms. She had 
 " faith " in her father, though her father 
 did not use that term. She " believed '* 
 that her father would receive her in his 
 arms and take care that she should not 
 be injured; though he did not use the 
 word " believe." She * lippened ' to him, 
 as he had told her, and confidently let go 
 her hold of everything around her. She 
 was not disappointed. All was well ; 
 and she was gratified in getting to be 
 with her father, and looking up from his 
 side to the light. . 
 
 '\ V 
 
SAVING faith:' 
 
 
 In the Old Testament Scriptures the 
 duty of tmst is frequently inculcated, 
 while the duty of faith, as distinguished 
 from trusty is just as frequently merged 
 out of view. 
 
 But it is of moment to bear in mind 
 two things : — 
 
 Firstly, that there is a connection be- 
 tween trii'St and tnith. Trust is, as it 
 were, the counterpart of truth. When 
 we see truth in an object, the truth seen, 
 shining into our minds, naturally reflects 
 itself back in the form of timst. We re- 
 spond to the truth and to the true ; we 
 trow, and we tru^t. It is thus that we 
 can trust Christ and God. It is thus 
 that we can trust in the atonement 
 wrought out by Christ, and accepted by 
 God, on our behalf. The belief of the 
 truth is in such a case the real basis of 
 our trust. 
 
 Secondly, Trust, while really the duty 
 of the sinner, is yet by no means his 
 primary duty. He must have a reason 
 
FAITH AND TRUST. 
 
 27 
 
 for liis trust, and " a sufficient reason " 
 as Leibnitz delighted to express it, {une 
 raison suffisante). He must, in other 
 words, believe the truth as it is in Jesus, 
 In that truth he has a truly " sufficient 
 " reason " for trusting in the Saviour as 
 his Saviour, and in the Heavenly Father 
 as his propitiated and propitious God. 
 And hence when the sinner is called 
 upon, in the New Testament Scriptures, 
 to " believe in the Lord Jesus Christ," 
 that he may be saved, and when he is 
 assured that, if he do thus believe, " he 
 " shall be saved " (Acts xvi, 3 1 ; John 
 iii, 16, 18, 36), the trust of the soul is 
 not lost sight of in the call to believe. It 
 is only, by a species of sublime philosophy, 
 analysed into its indispensable substrate. 
 It is, however, as it were, the last analysis. 
 The analyst cannot proceed farther arid 
 continue to find sufficient ground on which 
 to erect the unreserved promise, " thou shalt 
 " be saved" He may easily proceed far- 
 ther, indeed, if he be not in quest of the 
 
w 
 
 28 
 
 '' SAVING faith:' 
 
 ground of that promise. There must be 
 antecedents to faith. Men must have 
 evidence ere they can rationally believe. 
 They must also willingly search and see 
 that they may be able to apprehend and 
 appreciate the evidence. But still it 
 could scarcely be said, Search into the 
 truth of the Gospel, and thou shalt he saved, 
 A man may search, and yet not search 
 sufficiently. He may take a wrong di- 
 rection in his search. He may search in 
 the dark with his torch unlighted. Or 
 he may carry his lighted torch into empty 
 vaults. 
 
 But it can be legitimately and confi- 
 dently said, " Believe in the Lord Jesus 
 " Christ, and thou shalt he saved." When 
 once the preliminary searching is com- 
 pleted, and the sinner helieves the truth as 
 it is in Jesus, then his spirit is in pre- 
 sence of those glorious realities, which, 
 when spiritually discerned, secure peace 
 and joy and hope and love and holiness. 
 We have reason to believe that God's 
 
FAITH AND TRUST. 
 
 Lst be 
 have 
 )lieve. 
 d see 
 i and 
 :ill it 
 to the 
 saved. 
 search 
 ig di- 
 rch in 
 :; Or 
 empty 
 
 confi- 
 
 Jesus 
 When 
 
 com- 
 utli as 
 1 pre- 
 which, 
 
 peace 
 )liness. 
 
 God's 
 
 own infinite purity of heart, and conse- 
 quent infinite happiness, are everlastingly 
 secured, though not necessitated, by the 
 realities which are included within the 
 infinite scope of his knowledge. And, 
 correspondingly, there are certain grand 
 realities, which are so related to men, and 
 are of such heights and depths and widths 
 of adaptation to the wants of men, that, 
 if the hitman mind he consciously in their 
 presence, its peace and purity are secured. 
 These realities are divine ; and it is be- 
 cause all the chief realities in our human 
 sphere of being, have more or less of vital 
 relation to them, that there is ground for 
 plying, with encouragement and in hope, 
 the various instrumentalities within our 
 reach for advancing and consummating 
 the moral education of the world. There 
 is something to work upon. There are 
 grand correlations of being. We need 
 not despair of humanity. If once all 
 mankind were induced to stand conscious- 
 ly, " with open face," in the August Pre- 
 
30 
 
 (( c» 
 
 SAVING faith:' 
 
 sence, so as to look upon Christ as he is, 
 and upon " God in Christ " as he is, they 
 would all be "changed into the same 
 " image from glory to glory, as by the 
 " Lord the Spirit " ; and the golden age 
 of humanity would be realized. . >. 
 Archdeacon Hare misunderstood the 
 philosophy of human thought and feeling, 
 when he imagined that belief " is not a 
 "practical principle," (Victory of Faith, 
 p. 30), and that " the understanding is 
 " powerless to jiroduce any lasting reno- 
 " vating effect on the heart and soul of 
 "man." (p. 26.) The understanding q/* 
 itself, indeed, is powerless. Its mere ab- 
 stract act can be of no moral avail. But 
 when the objectivity of the act is in cor- 
 relation with the wants of the spirit, it 
 makes all the difference conceivable. 
 Nothing is more practical in human pur- 
 suits, and in the shaping of human char- 
 acter, than belief 
 
 ,» .. 
 
IMPORTANCE OF OBJECT OF FAITH, 31 
 
 he is, 
 3, they 
 
 same 
 )y the 
 in age 
 
 3d the 
 eeling, 
 
 not a 
 
 Faith, 
 
 [ing is 
 
 reno- 
 joul of 
 ling of 
 ire ab- 
 . But 
 in cor- 
 )irit, it 
 ivable. 
 n pur- 
 1 char- 
 
 THE TRANSCENDENT IMPORTANCE 
 OF THE OBJECT OF FAITH 
 
 It is the object of faith, that is the 
 great matter, — the great great matter. 
 The act, indeed, is also indispensably- 
 necessary. Without it the object could 
 never take the least effect upon the soul. 
 It could not get access to the soul. But 
 the whole peculiarity of the moral' effect 
 is dependent on the peculiarity of the 
 object. 
 
 Compare faith to a hand, — Let us 
 suppose that the soul is indigent. It is 
 indigent. It has " wasted its substance 
 " on riotous living," and is reduced to the 
 most abject poverty. It needs to hold out 
 its hand for " an alms" That is the at- 
 titude of the convicted soul. But the 
 mere outstretching of the hand will not 
 satisfy its craving wants. And when 
 once the hand is held out, the mere fold- 
 ing of the fingers upon themselves will 
 do no good. It is the thing grasped that 
 
1 
 
 
 <( t» 
 
 SAVING FAITH." x,..\v\ 
 
 will do good. But what if it be a stone ? 
 What if it be a serpent ? What if it be 
 a counterfeit coin, or a forged bank note ? 
 What then ? No relief will be experi- 
 enced. Positive injury may be the re- 
 sult. j4ll depends on the nature of the 
 object tvhich is received by the hand. 
 
 Change the figure. The act of faith 
 may be compared to the act of eating. 
 — " Come ye, buy and eat." (Isai. Iv, 1.) 
 The soul is hungry. It is in danger of 
 perishing for want. It must eat or die. 
 But the mere act of eating will do no 
 good. It is the thing eaten, and it alone, 
 that can nourish. The thing eaten, how- 
 ever, must be of a nourishing nature. 
 Suppose that the man should eat what is 
 utterly indigestible. What then ? Sup- 
 pose that he should eat what is positively 
 poisonous. What then ? The act of 
 eating might be perfect; but could he 
 be nourished ? It is the thing eaten, or 
 the object on which the act of eating takes 
 effect, that is of transcendent importance. 
 
IMPORTANCE OF OBJECT OF FAITH. 3:i 
 
 stone ? 
 f it be 
 I note ? 
 experi- 
 3he re- 
 of the 
 
 f faith 
 eating. 
 .. \y, 1.) 
 iger of 
 or die. 
 do no 
 } alone, 
 a, how- 
 nature, 
 ivhat is 
 Sup- 
 sitively 
 act of 
 uld he 
 tten, or 
 g takes 
 )rtance. 
 
 Or consider believing under the figure 
 of looking. — " Look unto me, and be ye 
 "saved." (Isai. xlv, 22.) Look unto 
 Jesus, as he was lifted up on the accursed 
 tree. The act of looking is indispensable. 
 If the eyes are closed and nothing be 
 seen, no benefit can be received. But 
 even though the eyes should look, — that 
 is not enough. Suppose that they look, 
 not to Jesus, but to the dust of the 
 ground, or to the fiery-flying serpents in 
 the air, or to self, or to some " sow wal- 
 " lowing in the mire," — the mere act of 
 looking at such objects will utterly fail 
 to give " peace and joy and hope," — hap- 
 piness and holiness. It is the nature of 
 the object looked at that affects the mind 
 of the beholder, either with pleasure or 
 with pain, either with delight, or with 
 disgust, or with indifference. 
 
 Compare believing to coming. — " Come 
 " unto me," says Jesus, " all ye that la- 
 bour and are heavy-laden, and I will 
 give you rest." (Matt, xi, 28.) The 
 
 b2 
 
 (( 
 
 <t 
 
84 
 
 "SAVING faith:' 
 
 act of cominj^ is indispensable, but the 
 result of the act is entirely dependent on 
 the direction taken by the locomotive 
 soul, and on the nature of the object that 
 is reached. Suppose that one conies, 
 not to a friend, but to a foe ! Suppose 
 that one comes, not to a home, but into 
 the heart of an ambush. What then ? 
 Or what if he comes toward a pitfall or a 
 precipice, and then continues to advance ? 
 What then ? The act of motion may, as 
 an acty be all that could be desired ; but 
 the result of the movement would be 
 disastrous. 
 
 It is the object, then, the object, that 
 is the matter of transcendent moment. 
 The inquiry of the spirit should not so 
 much be, how am I to believe ? as what 
 am I to believe ? The attention should 
 be fixed, not on the right loay of believing^ 
 but on the right thing to be believed. 
 
OBJECT OF SAVING FAITH TWOFOLD. 35 
 
 lut the 
 lent on 
 motive 
 ct that 
 conies, 
 uppose 
 it into 
 then ? 
 all or a 
 /ance ? 
 nay, as 
 i; but 
 Lild be 
 
 t, that 
 oment. 
 not so 
 J what 
 should 
 lieving, 
 
 THE OBJECT OF SA VING FAITH 
 ■ TWOFOLD, 
 
 The object of saving faith is, in a cer- 
 tain important respect, twofold or dual. 
 It is something that has both a without 
 and a within. It is somewhat like a 
 casket enclosing a gem ; or a body con- 
 taining a soul ; or a word with a thought 
 within. That which is without is the 
 immediate, or direct, and primary object 
 of saving faith (the ohjectum quo). That 
 which is within is the mediate, or indi- 
 rect, and ultimate, object (the ohjectum 
 quod). 
 
 The immediate, direct, and primary 
 object of saving faith is the Gospel — the 
 divine Testimony — ' the * Truth — the 
 Truth as it is in Jesus. The mediate 
 indirect, and ultimate object is Jesus Him- 
 self in his living personality y doing or 
 suffering whatsoever was needed for the 
 salvation of men. 
 
m 
 
 \ J 
 
 »« c 
 
 SAViNd faith:' KVrV'A \ 
 
 THE IMMEDIATE AND PRIMARY OBJECT 
 OF SAVING FAITH, ^ , 
 
 The immediate and primary object of 
 saving faith is, we have said, the Gospel, 
 or thr Testimony which God has given 
 coiicerniny his Son, or ' the ' Truth — the 
 Truth as it is in Jesus, It is thus a 
 proposition. All truth is propositional. 
 It is, from its very nature, subjective, 
 and therefore only subjectively real. It 
 is sul)jective reality in a state of cor- 
 respondence with objective reality. It 
 is the faithful mental mirroring of what 
 is objective to the mental mirror. And 
 being thus the correct reflection of ob- 
 jective realities, it is a secondary condition 
 of things. The primary realities are not 
 truths. God, for instance, is not a Truth. 
 It is a truth that God is. But when we 
 think and say that God is, we form and 
 utter a proposition. God's attributes too 
 are not truths, — though it is true that he 
 has attributes. They are objective reali- 
 
UV'\ 
 
 PRIMARY OBJECT OF SAVING FAITH. 37 
 
 OBJECT 
 
 ject of 
 Gospel, 
 given 
 h — the. 
 thus a 
 itional. 
 jective, 
 il. It 
 )f cor- 
 
 Y' It 
 t* what 
 And 
 of ob- 
 idition 
 ire not 
 Truth, 
 len we 
 m and 
 tes too 
 hat he 
 J reali- 
 
 ties. Tune is not a truth, though it is a 
 truth that time is. In like manner, 
 though it is true that space is, it is not 
 true that space is a truth. Powers, too, 
 as powers, are not truths. And acts and 
 facts, as acts and facts, are quite dis- 
 tinguishable from truths ; although, if we 
 rise to a standpoint of observation that 
 enables us to see an intended meaning in 
 all that is being brought to pass, and in 
 all that has been brought to pass, then 
 acts and facts may be regarded as im- 
 plicit propositions. God's acts and facts 
 will be implicit truths. Men's acts and 
 facts will be either implicit truths or im- 
 plicit falsehoods. 
 
 The proposition which is the immediate 
 and primary object of saving faith is, as 
 we have said, the Gospel, or the Truth as 
 it is in Jesus. — What is this ? 
 
 Th3 angel who appeared on the plain 
 of Bethlehem will inform us. He said, 
 Fear not : for, behold, I bring you good 
 tidings of great jog, which shall be to all 
 
!( 
 
 I 
 
 ''■JBH 
 
 i( 
 
 SAVING faith:' 
 
 • i '. 
 
 V ' 
 
 people ; for unto you is horn this day, in 
 the city of Davids a Saviour, who is Christ 
 the Lord. (Luke ii, 10, 11.) The 
 " good tidings of great joy," were the 
 divine Testimony. They are " the Truth." 
 They are " to all people." They are to 
 you, sinner. Unto you was born, 
 eighteen hundred and fifty years ago, a 
 Saviour, who is Christ the Lord. 
 
 Paul the apostle declares to us ex- 
 plicitly " the Gospel." He says to the 
 Corinthians (1st Ep. yv, 1—4), "Brethren, 
 •' I declare unto you the Gospel, which I 
 " preached unto you, which also ye re- 
 " ceived, and wherein ye stand ; by 
 " which also ye are saved, if ye keep in 
 " memory (or hold fast) what I preached 
 " unto you, unless ye have believed in 
 ** vain," aTid this is impossible, unless it he 
 false that Christ rose from the dead, see 
 verse 14; "for I delivered unto you, 
 " first of all, that which I also received, 
 " how that Christ died for our sins accord- 
 " ing to the Scriptures, and that he was 
 
PRIMARY OBJECT OF SA VING FAITH. 39 
 
 " buried, and that he rose again th£ third 
 "day according to the Scriptures" The 
 Gospel, then, is this, — " Christ died /or 
 " our sins, and was buried, and rose again." 
 It was " for our sin^," mark ; that is, for 
 yours and mine. Is not that enough ? 
 
 Hear again another announcement of 
 the Gospel, coming more immediately 
 from the lips of the Saviour himself. We 
 read in John iii, 1 6, that " God so loved 
 " the world that he gave his only begotten 
 " Son, that wliosoever believeth in him, 
 " should not perish, but have everlasting 
 " life." It is " the world *' which God 
 loved and loves. And the word " world" 
 just means, sinner, every other human 
 being ' and you' How glorious ! Yon 
 are not omitted or lost sight of. And 
 then God * so * loved every other human be- 
 ing ' and you! that he gave his only begot- 
 ten 'Son * for you all ! The greatness of 
 the gift is the measure of the greatness 
 of the love. How great then must God's 
 love have been ! How great must it still 
 
40 
 
 \\ 
 
 ''SAVING FAITH,"" 
 
 kUi vi. 
 
 be ! And it is to you. Is not the reve- 
 lation of it " glad tidings " ? And then 
 the Son finished successfully and triumph- 
 antly the work which was given him by 
 the Father to do. He completed the 
 atonement for human sin. All your sins, 
 O sinner, have thus been fully atoned 
 for, — all without exception. " The blood 
 " of Jesus Christ God's Son cleanseth us 
 "from all sin" (1 John i, 7.) " Herein 
 " is love, not that we loved God, but that 
 " he loved us, and sent his Son to be the 
 " propitiation for our sins," " and ho is the 
 " propitiation not for our sins • iiy, but 
 " also for the sins of the whole ivorld," (1 
 John iv, 10 ; ii, 2.) God is well pleased 
 for his Son's righteousness' sake. Such 
 is the truth as it is in Jesus. It is by 
 pre-eminence " the " Truth, the testimony 
 of God regarding his Son, — the gloriovs 
 Gospel of the grace of God. ' '"* ''''' 
 
 -U'j 
 
 oil J o; '{ijjiiidm 
 
 -'.»,. 
 
 
ULTIMATE OBJECT OF SAVING FAITH. 41 
 
 THE MEDIATE AND ULTIMATE 
 OBJECT OF SAVING FAITH. 
 
 Christ Himself, in his own living per- 
 sonality, is the mediate and ultimate 
 object of saving faith. 
 
 He is the mediate ouject. Now that 
 he is on the other side of the veil, which 
 divides the unseen from the seen, the 
 human mind, which is on this side, can- 
 not reach him immediately. It can reach 
 him only by means of the testimony con- 
 cerning him, — that testimony which, in 
 consequence of its peculiar delightfulness 
 on the one hand, and of its peculiar im- 
 portance on the other, is called * the ' 
 Go^el and ' the ' Truth. This testimony 
 is the way by which the human soul 
 travels to the Saviour, and gets to be 
 consciously in his presence at the foot of 
 his cross, or on the footstool of his 
 throne. 
 
 Christ is also the ultimate object of 
 saving faith ; — ultimate relatively to the 
 
''SAVING faith:' 
 
 \^^\\.S V 
 
 I 
 
 testimony as the primary object. So far 
 as there is a necessary dualism in the 
 objectivity of saving faith, Christ is the 
 ultimate object. When the mind goes 
 beyond this dualism into an interior or 
 higher sphere of relations, it meets with 
 another dualism in which Jesus is not 
 the ultimate but the primary Object of 
 faith, not the Last but the First, not the 
 End but " the Way." The Divine Father 
 is the Ultimate Object. Jesus is the way 
 to the Father. (John xiv, 6.) He is the 
 Mediator between God and men, and is 
 thus the Medium by which erring men 
 may get back to God. The Father is the 
 end of ends, — the Final End. He is the 
 absolutely Ultimate. The Son, as Sa- 
 viour, is " subject to the Father, that God 
 "may he all in all" (1 Cor. xv, 28 ; 
 John xiv, 28.) When, in the exercise of 
 saving faith, we believe in Jesus, as " the 
 " propitiation for our sins, and not for 
 " ours only, but also for the sins of the 
 " whole world" (1 John ii, 2), we natur- 
 
ULTIMATE OBJECT OF SAVING FAITH. 43 
 
 ally ascend from the Propitiator to the 
 Propitiated. The propitiation was ren- 
 dered to the Father, and was accepted hy 
 Him. We thus believe, tdtimately, not 
 so much in the propitiation of the Son, 
 as in the propitiousness of the Father. 
 
 But relatively to the Gospel, or the 
 Testimony of the Holy Spirit, Jesus is 
 ultimate. He is beyond or within the 
 Gospel. He is on the farther or inner 
 side. We must penetrate the Gospel, to 
 get to Him. And the moment that the 
 soul does penetrate, or get through, it is 
 " with Jesus." There is nothing else in- 
 tervening. In an exceedingly sublime 
 sense, the soul is then " in Jesus." 
 
 The Gospel testimony, however, must 
 be penetrated. It will not suffice that 
 the mind be arrested on its superficies. 
 There is a dualism here too, in the testi- 
 mony itself, — a dualism with which the 
 mind has to deal, before it proceeds to the 
 interior dualism of the toord and the Word, 
 and the still grander dualism of the Son 
 
m 
 
 t( 
 
 SA VINO FAITH." Wl A VAA'A 
 
 and the Father. The testimony has an 
 outside and an inside, — a word and a 
 thought. The mind must not be arrested 
 at the outward word. It must go through 
 it to the inward thought. It is the 
 thought of the Holy Spirit of God. If 
 the mind do not go through the outward 
 word to the inward thought, then " the 
 " word may be nigh thee, in thy mouth, 
 " and in thy heart, even the word of faith, 
 " which we preach," and yet thou mayest 
 all the time be out at sea, and inconsist- 
 ently and inconsiderately saying in per- 
 plexity — " Who shall ascend into heaven, 
 " to bring Christ down from above ? or, 
 " who shall descend into the deep, to 
 " bring up Christ from beneath ? " (Rom. 
 X, 6 — 8.) The mind must go through 
 the word to the thought, and into the 
 thought, and through the thought, if it 
 would find the actual Saviour. But 
 whenever it does get to and into the 
 thought, and passes through it, it is 
 with the Saviour. It is with the Saviour 
 
BELIEVING • ON' OR 'IN' THE SAVIOUR. 46 
 
 as he was. It is with the Saviour as he 
 is. It is with Christ crucified. It is 
 with Christ glorified. It is with Christ 
 the Propitiator, — the Propitiator for all 
 human sin. It is with Christ as " the 
 " Way " to the Father. It is on " the Way" ; 
 and it ascends ly " the Way," till it is 
 with the propitiated and propitious 
 Father. It is presented by the Propi- 
 tiator, and it is therefore present with the 
 propitious Father. How is it possible 
 for it to despair, in such a Presence ? 
 How is it possible for it to fear ? How 
 is it possible for it to be ungrateful, un- 
 adoring, unholy ? 
 
 .mi:ii> 
 
 BELIEVING 'ON' OR 'IN' THE SAVIOUR, 
 
 We not only speak of Miemng, We 
 also speak of believing on, and believing 
 in. And in the Greek language there is 
 still another idiom which has not been 
 reproduced in our English tongue, be- 
 
46 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 1 A 
 
 lieving to. This phrase believing to occurs 
 very frequeiitly in the New Testament. 
 It is the phrase that occurs, for instance, 
 in John xiv, 1, " Let not your heart be 
 " troubled : believe in God, believe also in 
 " ine." In the original it is believe to 
 God, believe also to me. It is a beautifully 
 significant idiom. It represents believing 
 or faith as going out from the mind to 
 its object. " Let your believing," said 
 the Saviour to his disciples, "go out 
 *' to God ; let it go out to me." In our 
 English idiom we merge from view the 
 process of going, and fix our attention on 
 the rest or repose which is obtained at 
 the termination of the journey. Hence 
 we say Believe * on * God, believe also ' on ' 
 me ; or Believe ' in * God, believe also * in ' 
 me ; that is, Let ymir believing rest * on ' 
 God and ' in ' God ; let it also rest * on * 
 and * in ' me. Or, we might express the 
 idea thus, Have faith in God, have faith 
 also in me. 
 
 We can speak not only of believing * m 
 
BELIEVING 'ON' OB 'IN' THE SAVIOUR. 47 
 
 Jems ' and. * in God,' but also of helieving 
 * in the Gospel! The expression in Mark 
 i, 15 that is rendered in our Authorized 
 Version, believe the Gospel, is, in the 
 original, believe ' in * the Gospel, The 
 two phrases, though lying on one line of 
 import, are not absolutely identical. 
 When we speak of believing the Gospel, 
 we regard it as veraciously testifying to 
 some object beyond itself, on which our 
 believing is to terminate. When we 
 speak of believing in the Gospel, we regard 
 the Gospel for the moment as itself the 
 terminus of our faith, — the object in 
 which our believing gets repose. 
 
 There is another set of phrases that 
 occurs — believing Christ and believing in 
 or on Christ, Christ said to the Jews, 
 — " Because I tell you the truth, ye be- 
 " lieve me not " — if I say the truth, " why 
 do ye not believe me?" (John viii, 45, 
 46.) Paul, on the other hand, said to 
 the Philippian jailor, " believe on the Lord 
 " Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved." 
 
48 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 (Acts xvi, 31.) He said also to the 
 Galatians "We have believed in Jesus 
 " Christ, that we might be justified by 
 "the faith of Christ." (Gal. ii, 16.) 
 The difference between the two phrases is 
 obvious. It does not involve a difference 
 in the act of believing. It only involves 
 a difference in the objectivity of the act. 
 When we believe Christ, we regard him 
 as veracious, or as truly exhibiting a testi- 
 mony — it may be a testimony concerning 
 himself. He is " the Amen, the faithful 
 " and true witness.'* (Kev. iii, 1 4.) Our 
 faith is ready to rise and fly to the thing 
 which he testifies, or to the object which 
 he testifyingly holds out to view. But 
 when we believe * in ' him or * on' him, 
 we regard him as himself truly exhibited 
 in a testimony. Our faith is supposed 
 to alight on him, and to remain where 
 it has alighted. It folds its wings and 
 is at rest. , ii > ^ 
 
DEGREES OF FAITH. 
 
 to the 
 
 Jesus 
 led by 
 i, 16.) 
 •ases is 
 ference 
 ivolves 
 )he act. 
 rd him 
 a testi- 
 cerning 
 faithful 
 ) Our 
 e thing 
 
 which 
 But 
 
 ' him, 
 vhihited 
 pposed 
 
 where 
 gs and 
 
 vS 
 
 DEGREES OF FAITH. 
 
 
 V It arises from the very nature of faith, 
 that it is susceptible of dej^a-ees. The 
 mind in believing reaches its object, wliat- 
 ever that object may be, discursively or 
 mediately, not immediately. There is, in 
 other words, something in the middle be- 
 tween the mind and the object. This 
 something in the middle may be more or 
 less complex. It may be a pile of suc- 
 cessive complexities. At all events, and 
 whether simple or complex, it requires to 
 be interrogated and interpreted. Hence it 
 may be more or less thoroughly mastered : 
 and thus the faith thai reaches its object 
 through the intervening medium, may be 
 more or less coincident with absolute 
 knowledge on the one hand, or mere 
 opinion on the other. 
 
 In the case of the Gospel and the 
 Great Living Object exhibited in the 
 Gospel, there is scope for very varjnng 
 degrees of faith. If one's faith were 
 
 
 
no 
 
 ^'SAVING faith:' 
 
 founded on only a single passage of the 
 l^ible, it might stand indeed, but it could 
 not be exceedingly secure. If, for in- 
 stance, one's faith in the Trinity were 
 founded simply and singly on 1 John v, 
 7, " there are th: that bear record in 
 " heaven, the Fatner, the Word, and the 
 " Holy Ghost, and these three are one," 
 it would be exceedingly insecure. The 
 verse is unauthentic. It is apocryphal, 
 as has been admitted for long by all 
 competent critics. It is not found in 
 the critical editions of the New Testa- 
 ment. It was not found in the first and 
 second editions of Erasmus's text. It 
 is not found in any of the old manu- 
 scripts. It could not be found in any 
 real revision of our Authorized English 
 Version.^ It should never have been at 
 all in any copy of the Bible. But what 
 then ? Is the doctrine of the Trinity in 
 peril ? Is it rendered uncertain, when 
 this passage is withdrawn ? Not in the 
 
 ^ It is omitted in the Revised Version of 1881. 
 
 'isV.v 
 
DEGREES OF FAITH. 
 
 51 
 
 least. But if any one's faith in the doc- 
 trine rested singly and exclusively on 
 the testimony of this passage, it would 
 falter and totter and collapse as soon as 
 he found himself compelled to surrender 
 the text. 
 
 If, in like manner, any one's faith in 
 the Gospel, and in the Great Living Object 
 exhibited in the Gospel, were dependent 
 on one passage only, or on one single 
 fibre and aspect of representation in the 
 volume of the Book, it would not be 
 very secure. A new view of a word or 
 of a phrase might overturn it. A single 
 wave of public or social thought, dashing 
 against the single support of his faith, 
 might any day shake it to its base, and 
 the man's faith would stagger and might 
 altogether fail and fall. 
 
 But if one's faith in the Gospel, and 
 in the Saviour as exhibited in the 
 Gospel, be grounded on a large induc- 
 tion and aggregation of individual pas- 
 sages, carefully tested, sifted, and in- 
 
(( 
 
 SAVING FAITH,'' 
 
 terpreted; and if this grounding be 
 itself grounded on a judicious and com- 
 prehensive consideration of the entire 
 scope of the written revelation, there 
 will belong to the faith a very different 
 degree of stability and security. If there 
 be added to this, the experience in one's 
 self, and the observation in the case of 
 others, of the moral power of the object of 
 faith, — its power to give peace on the one 
 hand, and to restrain from evil on the 
 other, and to constrain to good, then there 
 will be gi'eat confirmation of the faith. 
 And if, in addition, there be haniiony 
 discerned between the history that is 
 within the Book, and the history that 
 li'js scattered about outside the Book; and 
 if there be also harmonies discerned 
 between the revelation that is written in 
 the volume, and the unwritten revelation 
 of things spiritual : and if science, too, as 
 it advances, is seen to furnish no antago- 
 nism at all to Scripture, but only to lift 
 us to loftier and still loftier standpoints 
 
DEGREES OF FAITH, 
 
 53 
 
 m ones 
 
 of observation and interpretation, — then 
 the faith becomes still more settled and 
 fast. It grows broader. It grows deeper. 
 It rises higher and higher. It feels 
 stronger. 
 
 In consistency with these views, we 
 find in Scripture a recognition of very 
 different degrees of faith. Our Saviour 
 said to his disciples, on the Sea of Galilee, 
 when they were alarmed by the rising 
 storm, " Why are ye fearful, ye of little 
 faith r' (Matt, viii, 26.) He said to 
 Peter at another time, " thou of little 
 "faith, wherefore didst thou doubt ? " 
 (Matt, xiv, 31.) He said, on the other 
 side of things, to the Syrophenician 
 woman, " O woman, great is thy faith." 
 (Matt. XV, 28.) He said too in reference 
 to the Eoman centurion at Capernaum, 
 " I have not found so great faith, no, not 
 " in Israel." (Luke vii, 9.) 
 
 There may then be little faith, and 
 there may be great faith. And hence 
 there may not only be assurance, there 
 
m 
 
 "SAVING FAITH." 
 
 1 1 
 
 may likewise be the full assw^ance of 
 faith. (Heb. x, 22.) The disciples had 
 reason to say to the Lord, " Increase our 
 "faith." (Luke xvii, 5.) And the Lord 
 had good reason to say to the disciples, 
 " If ye had faith as a grain of mustard 
 " seed, ye might say unto this sycamme 
 " tree. Be thou plucked up by the root, 
 and be thou planted in the sea ; and it 
 should obey you." (Luke xvii, 6.) 
 The least real faith will do wonder's. It 
 will effect marvellous changes. It will 
 root up and transplant. It will remove 
 even " mountains," that would otherwise 
 be immovable and obstructions for ever. 
 (Mat. xvii, 20.) 
 
 n 
 
 it 
 
 LIVING FAITH AND DEAD FAITH. 
 
 James, " the servant of God, and of the 
 "Lord Jesus Christ," says in the 2nd 
 chapter of his Epistle, verses 14-20 : — 
 " What doth it profit, my brethren, 
 
 M 
 
 % 
 
 ■^ 
 
 M 
 
LIVING FAITH AND DEAD FAITH, 55 
 
 •' though a man say he hath faith, and 
 " have not works ? Can faith save him ? 
 '* If a brother or sister he naked, and 
 " destitute of daily food, and one of you 
 " say unto them. Depart in peace, he ye 
 '* warmed and filled ; notwithstanding 
 ** ye give them not those things which are 
 " needful to the body ; what doth it 
 " profit ? Even so faith, if it hath not 
 " works, is dead, being alone. Yea, ci 
 " man may say. Thou hast faith, and I 
 " have works : show me thy faith without 
 " thy works, and I ivill shotv thee my 
 ''faith by m,y works. Thou believest that 
 " there is one God ; thou doest well. The 
 " devils also believe and tremble. But 
 **wilt thou know, vain man, that 
 ''faith without works is dead ? " 
 
 Are we to conclude from these words, 
 that there are two distinct kinds of 
 faith, or two distinct ways of believing 
 the true Gospel, a right way and a 
 wrong ? So many have imagined, — but 
 without sufficient warrant. 
 
I I 
 
 66 
 
 "SAVING faith: 
 
 
 The inspired ivriter is reprohatinf/ 
 pretended faith of the Gospel. He is 
 supposing the case, not of a man who 
 has "faith without works!' but of a 
 man who " says he has faith " while he 
 lias no works. And he proceeds to 
 show that such a person's faith is unreal. 
 It is not merely of a wrong kind ; it is 
 a " sham." He adduces, for illustration, 
 the case of a destitute brother or sister 
 coming to a professed brother in the 
 faith, who has plenty of this world's 
 good things. This professed brother 
 has a philanthropic tongue, and liberal 
 lips. He "says" Depart in peace, he 
 tvar'ined, he filled. These are admirable 
 words, kind and charitable, such as 
 might be expected from an open-hearted, 
 open-handed, generous man. But the 
 liberality, it is supposed, is only from 
 the teeth outward. "Notwithstanding 
 "he gives not those things which are 
 needful to the body." Well, "What 
 doth it profit" — ^What is the profit 
 
 <c 
 
 (( 
 
LIVING FAITH AND DEAD FAITH, 57 
 
 to the man io whom the gracious words 
 were spoken ? Manifestly, nothing. And 
 what is the profit, in the ledger-book 
 of heaven, to the man hy whom the 
 sracious words were uttered ? As 
 manifestly, nothing. "Even so," con- 
 tinue" the inspired writer, "faith, if it 
 " hath not works, is dead, being alone." 
 The person who "says he has faith,'* 
 whilst he has no corresponding works, 
 is as truly a mere prettiider to faith, as 
 the man with the liberal lips and close 
 pocket is a mere pretender to kindness 
 and generosity. His profession is mere 
 profession, without possession. It is 
 like a body without a soul. The life 
 is gone out of it, if life it ever had. 
 It is " dead." 
 
 No doubt the man who " says he has 
 " faith," while he has no " works of faith," 
 may he believing something. He may 
 even be believing something that is very 
 intimately connected with the Gospel. 
 And hence the inspired writer adds, — 
 
 c2 
 
58 
 
 *' SAVING FAITH." 
 
 " Thou believest that there is one God. 
 "Thou doest well. The devils — the 
 '* demons — also believe, and tremble." The 
 man of liberal loquacity and loquacious 
 liberality might be believing, it is ad- 
 mitted, in some sucli doctrine as the 
 unity of the Godhead, — a most important 
 truth. " Thou doest well." It was good 
 that the man had got so far as to believe 
 that. Few in the days of the apostles 
 had got that length. The whole world 
 was running after " gods many." Men 
 in general were idolaters. To the eye 
 of the world it was one of the most 
 distinguishing and extraordinary features 
 of Christians, that they denied that 
 there were any more gods than one. It 
 was universally said of them, — " These 
 " Christians say that Jupiter is no god, 
 " and that Mars and Mercury are no 
 "more gods than stocks and stones are. 
 " Did you ever hear of such profanity ? " 
 The Christians indeed were often called 
 atheists, because they denied the godhead 
 
LIVING FAITH AND DEAD FAITH, 59 
 
 of the gods of the nations. Hence the 
 idea of the unity of the Godhead was 
 regarded as one of the salient peculiarities 
 of the Christian ; and a man might be 
 apt to suppose that if he embraced that 
 idea, he would be a Christian. 
 
 It was a mistake, howeve . A man 
 might "believe that there is one God," 
 and be a bad man after all. He might 
 have no good works. The very demons 
 believe it, says the inspired writer, and 
 continue demons still. There is nothing 
 wrong, to be sure, in the way in which 
 they put forth their act of faith. It is 
 not some peculiarity in the forth-putting 
 of that act that renders their believing 
 nugatory. By no means. Their belief 
 is followed by appropriate and power- 
 ful effects. They " tremble." They know 
 that there is a God to whom they 
 are responsible. And they know too 
 that there is no second God, into whose 
 dominions they might have a chance of 
 fleeing, so as to be beyond the reach of 
 
60 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 the God whom they have offended. But 
 then this truth of the unity of the God- 
 head is not the Gospel, It is not Jesus. 
 There is thus no Gospel, there is no 
 Jesus, in the object of the faith of the 
 demons. They do not, and they cannot, 
 believe that the Son of God loved them, 
 and gave himself for them. 
 
 If any man, then, has never *'trem- 
 " bled " before God, we have good reason 
 to conclude that he has never believed 
 so much as even the demons believe. 
 
 But if any man has merely "trembled** 
 before God, we have good reason to con- 
 clude that he has never believed more 
 than the demons believe.^ 
 
 If any man, however, is glad indeed, 
 and grateful to God, — if he loves God, — 
 if he loves his character and will, — he 
 has believed far more than that there is 
 
 ^ Mr. Ecking, in his day, startled many people 
 unnecessarily by maintaining that "whosoever 
 "among men believes what devils do about the 
 "Son of God, is bom of God, and shall be saved." 
 Essays on Grace, Faith, and Experience, pp. 100, 
 169. 
 
 \ 
 
BELIEVING WITH THE HEART 
 
 61 
 
 one God. He has believed " the word of 
 " reconciliation " — " the glorious Gospel 
 " of God*s gi'ace " — the glad tidings that 
 " God was in Christ reconciling the 
 " world unto himself, not imputing their 
 " trespasses unto men " (2 Cor. v, 1 9). His 
 faith is thus alive with "life eternal," 
 and is for ever shooting forth from its 
 vitality flowers of holiness and fruits of 
 good works. * 
 
 BELIEVING WITH THE HEART. 
 
 The apostle Paul expresses himself in 
 the following manner, — " If thou shalt 
 " confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, 
 " and shalt believe in thine heart that 
 " God hath raised him from the dead, 
 " thou shalt be saved. For with the 
 " heart man helleveth unto righteous- 
 " ness ; and with the mouth confession 
 " is made unto salvation." (Kom. x, 9, 
 10.) 
 
 Many theologians, founding on the 
 
62 
 
 '* SAVING faith:' 
 
 apostle's expression, have distinguished 
 between believing with the heart and 
 believing with the head. The latter they 
 represent as an insufficient kind of be- 
 lieving. The former they regard as the 
 right kind. 
 
 The distinction is pleasantly allitera- 
 tive and well meant. It proceeds, more- 
 over, on the correct assumption that if 
 the love of the heart is not stirred 
 toward God and toward goodness, no 
 amount of profession of faith will be of 
 the least avail, But it is nevertheless 
 an unhappy and unwarrantable dis- 
 tinction. 
 
 The word heart, as used by the 
 apostle, is not to be distinguished from 
 the word h^ad. There is no such dis- 
 tinction suggested by the apostle himself. 
 In using the word heart, he did not refer 
 to the seat of the emotions, as distin- 
 guished from the seat of the intelligence. 
 He did not employ the word in our 
 English conventional acceptation of the 
 
BELIEVING WITH THE HEART. 
 
 63 
 
 shed 
 and 
 
 they 
 be- 
 the 
 
 term. He employed it in its usual 
 Biblical acceptation as denoting generi- 
 cally the heart, or interior part, of our 
 complex being. The term is thus very 
 much equivalent to our word mind, or to 
 the phrase the inner rnun as distinguished 
 from the outer man. Hence it is that we 
 read of " thinking in the heart " (Matt, 
 ix, 4) ; " understanding with the heart " 
 (Matt, xiii, 15); and " reasoning in the 
 heart" (Luke v, 22). In all such cases 
 there is no distinction intended between 
 the heart and the head. And assuredly 
 there is none intended in Eomans x, 9, 
 10 ; for the apostle explicitly points out 
 the distinction which was present to his 
 mind. It is the distinction between the 
 moicth and the heart. " If thou shalt 
 " confess ivith thy mouth and believe in 
 thine heart." It is the distinction be- 
 tween external profession and internal pos- 
 session. "With the mouth "confession is 
 made unto salvation," when with the 
 heart "man believeth unto righteousness." 
 
64 
 
 "SAVING FAITUr 
 
 " There is in reality," says Kotheram, 
 " but one kind of faith." {Essay on Faith, 
 p. 50.) , 
 
 •J?F' FAITH AND * THROUGH' FAITH, BUT 
 NOT ' FOR' FAITH. 
 
 We read frequently of being justified 
 or saved hj faith, o>: through faith, but 
 never ^. (/r /ai^/i. It is important to note 
 the phrese':'Iogy. It lays an interdict on 
 the idea that it is in consideration of the 
 merit of our faith, that justification or 
 salvation is conferred. There is no such 
 merit. The merit is in the great object 
 of faith. It is in Christ. 
 
 Faith indeed is itself a work, in a 
 small way. Jesus said, "This is the, 
 " work of God, that ye believe on him 
 '* whom He hath sent." (John vi, 29.) 
 Faith is an act of the energy of the soul. 
 In that particular sense, it is a work. 
 And in so far as it is r work at all, it is 
 a good work. God has enjoined it. He 
 
FAITH THE OlFT OF OOD, 
 
 approves of it. There is a world-wide 
 difference between it, morally viewed, 
 and unbelief or rebellion. It is, more- 
 over, the mother of good works. " Faith 
 worketh." It is a working principle. 
 But still there is nothing in it of the 
 nature of an equivalent for salvation. 
 When we come with it, we do not 
 come with a price in our hand. We 
 only come to receive, in our empty handy 
 the divine alms of salvation. When we 
 stand, by means of it, upon the Eock of 
 Ages, there is nothing intervening be- 
 tween us and the Kock. We stand 
 " barefoot:' ' 
 
 FAITH THE GIFT OF GOD. 
 
 Calvin supposed that it is not faith, 
 but salvation, that is said in Ephesians 
 
 ***None are justified or saved /or believing." 
 ** The active and passive obedience of Christ is the 
 " whole and alone cause of salvation." (Benjamin 
 Ingham, Treatise on the Faith and Hope of the 
 Gospel, p. 64, ed. 1822.) Certainly the work of 
 Ohnst is the only meritorious cause of salvation. 
 
? 
 
 l\ 
 
 6A 
 
 ** SAVING FAITH.' 
 
 ii, 8, to be the gift of God. We pre- 
 sume, however, that it is to faith that 
 the Apostle parenthetically refers ; and 
 we conceive that he is drawing attention 
 to the fact that we are indebted to the 
 grace or lovingkindness of God not only 
 for the Saviour, and for the salvation 
 which he procured, but likewise for the 
 link of connection that unites us to the 
 Saviour, and thus makes us partakers of 
 the great salvation. Not that the 
 Apostle means to constrain us into the 
 conviction that we are utterly passive 
 in the matter of faith. It would be no 
 glory to God if we were merely acted on, 
 and did not act. Our responsibility 
 would be gone. We would be things, 
 not persons. It is necessary that we be 
 more than mere recipients, and cisterns. 
 We are well-springs of living activity. 
 And assuredly we act, and act voluntarily, 
 when we send out our thought believingly 
 to the Glorious Object who is revealed 
 in the glorious Gospel of God's grace. 
 
FAITH THE GIFT OF GOD. 
 
 67 
 
 There is indeed something involuntary 
 in faith. We cannot absolutely deter- 
 mine what we shall believe, and what 
 we shall not believe. Evidence is 
 sometimes overwhelming, and we must be- 
 lieve, — ^however strongly we might desire 
 to come to a different conclusion. But 
 in multitudes of cases we require to go fn 
 quest of evidence ; or, if it is brought to 
 us and spread out before us, we require 
 to direct our minds to its consideration. 
 We require to sift and measure it, and to 
 weigh detail after detail. If there be 
 apparently conflicting evidence, we re- 
 quire to consider it too. Hence the need 
 for voluntary activity. And hence it is 
 that men are accountable for their belief 
 or for their unbelief in reference to the 
 Gospel of salvation. 
 
 Faith in the Gospel is the gift of God, 
 in a sense consistent with our voluntary 
 activity and accountability. The facilities 
 for faith are from God. All the grand 
 inducements are from Him. The chief 
 
68 
 
 ^'SAVING faith:\\ 
 
 
 motives are from Him. It is He who 
 gives the light. It is He who draws the 
 heart; though he will not drag it. " No 
 man can come to me," says Jesus, " ex- 
 " cept the Father who has sent me draw 
 " him ; and I will raise him up at the 
 last day." But he immediately adds, in 
 a* way that is finely explanatory of what 
 he means by drawing, " as it is written 
 " in the prophets, and they shall be all 
 *' taught of God, Every man therefore 
 " that hath heard, and hath learned of the 
 " Father, cometh unto me." (John vi, 44, 
 45.) It is thus in the way of teaching 
 that the Father draws. He reveals real- 
 ities by his Holy Spirit, and presses them 
 home upon human attention by the same 
 divine Spirit ; so that, whenever any one 
 believes, he is ready to lift up his heart 
 adoringly and gratefully to his Heavenly 
 Father and to say, — It is through thy 
 grace that I see, and understand, and be- 
 lieve ! It is through thy grace that I am 
 what I am ! Unto thee he all the glory. 
 
HELP MINE UNBELIEF, 
 
 69 
 
 HELP MINE UNBELIEF. 
 
 The words " Lord, I believe ; help thou 
 mine unbelief!" are, in some respects, 
 intensely interesting. But it is possible 
 to make too much of them. They indi- 
 cate a struggle to be right. The battling 
 spirit makes a desperate effort. It so far 
 overcomes the intervening and opposing 
 influences as to get its hand upon the 
 edge of the much-prized object. Yet it 
 feels as if it could not get a firm hold. 
 It is distressed at its comparative failure. 
 And *n its agony it turns aloft for help, 
 and cries to God. All this is such a 
 spectacle of moral weakness on the one 
 hand, and moral earnestness on the other, 
 as is fitted to enlist the sympathies of 
 every sensitive spectator 
 
 But it should be borne in mind, at the 
 same time, that we are nowhere enjoined 
 or invited to give utterance to the cry 
 " Lord, I believe ; help thou mine un- 
 " belief!" Neither was it any of the 
 
■' 
 
 70 
 
 "SAVING FAITH.'* 
 
 representative men of revelation, such as 
 Paul or Peter or John, who uttered the 
 words. Neither was it Mary or Martha. 
 Neither is it the case that the words 
 were said vnth reference to the salvation 
 of the souL They were the words of the 
 anonymous father of the child, that was 
 " sore tried" with a dumb demon. (Mark 
 ix, 24.) This father had brought his 
 poor patient to the disciples of our Lord. 
 But they could do nothing for him. He 
 then applied to the Master, who said " 
 "faithless generation, how long shall I 
 be with you, how long shall I suffer 
 you ? Bring him unto me." When he 
 was brought, the father in a somewhat 
 despairing spirit said, " If thou canst do 
 ** anything, have compassion on us, and 
 " help us." He was not sure whether 
 Jesus cotdd do anything for them. Jesus 
 said to him, " If thou canst believe, all 
 " things are possible to him that be- 
 ** lieveth." The father stretched his 
 spirit forth, and at length attained to 
 
 « 
 
 <t 
 
CHRIST THE LEADER OF FAITH. 71 
 
 some persuasion of the ability of the 
 Lord, " and straightway cried out, and 
 " said with tears. Lord, I believe ; help 
 " thou mine unbelief !" Our Saviour did 
 not quench the smoking flax. He did 
 not break, or trample on, the bruised 
 reed. And yet he did not commend the 
 poor man's utterance. It is added by 
 the evangelist, " When Jesus saw thai 
 " the people came running together, he 
 " rebuked the foul spirit, saying unto 
 " him. Thou dumb and deaf spirit, I 
 " charge thee, come out of him, and enter 
 " no more into him." It would not be 
 advisable that any should rest contented 
 with the feeble flicker of faith that is 
 indicated in the words of the agitated 
 petitioner. 
 
 CHRIST THE LEADER 
 AND FINISHER OF FAITH, 
 
 In Hebrews xii, 2, Christ is referred 
 to as " the author and finisher of o^tr 
 
T 
 
 72 
 
 "SAVING FAITH.'' 
 
 " faith." The word our is a supplement, 
 and leads the mind astray from the 
 natural interpretation of the expression. 
 There is no specific reference to "mir 
 " faith." The reference is generic. Jesus 
 is " the author and finisher of faith" 
 
 Not only is the word 02ir a supple- 
 ment, the word author is an unhappy 
 translation. The word (ap-xriyo^) properly 
 means leader. In the only other pas- 
 sages in which it is found in the New 
 Testament, it is translated twice pnnce 
 and once captain. In the three instances 
 it is applied to Jesus. He is " a prince 
 and a Saviour." (Acts v, 31.) He is 
 " the prince of life." (Acts iii, 15.) He 
 is " the captain of our salvation." (Heb. 
 ii, 10.) He is the great • Leader of 
 sinful men, — the Guide. It is he only 
 that can lead or guide them into life 
 everlasting and eternal salvation. It is 
 he, too, who is the great " Leader and 
 " Finisher of faith." 
 
 In the matter of faith he leads the 
 
CHRIST THE LEADER OF FAITH. 73 
 
 I 
 I 
 
 way. And he brings that principle of 
 faith in which he takes the lead, to a 
 " finished " perfection. 
 
 The inspired writer, then, does not 
 mean that Jesus woi^ks within us, from 
 its beginning to its ending, the act or exercise 
 of faith. It is not " our faith " that 
 is spoken of. Neither does he mean that 
 it is Jesus who is the authm^ and finisher 
 of the object of faith, the propitiation. 
 This idea, indeed, is emphatically true, 
 and emphatically evangelical. It is the 
 essence and quintessence of the Gospel. 
 But as the word translated author means 
 leader, it is not the case that the term 
 faith ii here employed to denote the object 
 of faith. 
 
 The mind of the inspired writer was 
 looking in a different direction. He 
 was looking to Jesus as the most Illus- 
 trious of Believers. 
 
 It cannot, of course, be meant that 
 Jesus needed, like men in general, to 
 believe in a propitiation for liis sins. 
 
74 
 
 \ \ ) 
 
 HAVING faith:' 
 
 That is abundantly obvious. He was 
 the "spotioss" Lamb of God. 
 
 But there are other things that may 
 be believed in, liesides the propitiation 
 for sin. There are myriads of things on 
 earth, to which explorers, scientific in- 
 vestigators, and travellers bear testimony. 
 And there are innumerable other things 
 besides, having some connection with our 
 earth, but yet not distinctively terrestrial, 
 that may be, and that should be, the ob- 
 jects of our faith. Indeed, it is a very 
 few things comparatively which we can 
 know by personal observation and ex- 
 perience, by actual touch and taste and 
 seeing and hearing and smelling, or by 
 the inner senses of the spirit, or by 
 demonstration. All other objects, if oc- 
 cupying our minds at all, must be objects 
 of faith. 
 
 True, we are apt to associate with the 
 word believer, when we use the term re- 
 ligiously, the idea of the propitiation for 
 sin as the great object of faith. And hence 
 
CHRIST THE LEADER OF FAITH. 75 
 
 was 
 
 in- 
 
 we may feel some tlilticulty in so disin- 
 tegrating our associated ideas as to realize 
 that there is congriiity in thinking and 
 speaking about Jesus Christ as having 
 faith, and as being the Chief and Chief- 
 tain of Believers. But nevertheless, it is 
 of moment, while conceding to the pro- 
 pitiation for sin an exceedingly high and 
 towering pre-eminence to ourselves as an 
 object of faith, that we should bear in 
 mind that it is, after all, only one — though 
 resplendently conspicuous — among many 
 objects on which our faith may terminate. 
 The whole universe of spirit — the .whole 
 universe of spirits — with the small excep- 
 tion of what is made known to us concern- 
 ing ourselves in our own consciousness, is 
 brought within the sphere of our thought 
 and love and choice and appreciation by 
 the exercise of believing. It is possible, 
 then, that Jesus may have been the Chief 
 of Believers, and the great Exemplar who, 
 in respect to faith, as truly as in respect 
 to meekness and lowliness and love, " left 
 
l) 'I 
 
 r« 
 
 *' SAVING faith: 
 
 \[ 
 
 \ t 
 
 
 " us an example that we should follow 
 " His steps." 
 
 The inspired writer, in the glorious 
 preceding context, has reference to faith 
 in thi>o(js spiritual t celestial, everlasting , — 
 in things ' not seen ' hut * hojjed for.* The 
 faith of which he speaks embraced within 
 its range, past and foremost, God himself 
 — the unseen God, the grandest, the 
 most glorious, the most gladdening of 
 all Realities. We must believe " that 
 " God is." We must believe that He 
 is " the Eewarder of them who " dili- 
 " gently seek him ; " — a most gladsome 
 feature of his glorious character. We 
 must believe that it is He, our own 
 personal Father, who made, the world ; — 
 a most gladsome fact. We must believe 
 that it was he who made ourselves, and 
 made us in his own image, so that, in- 
 deed, we are " his offspring ; " — a most 
 gladsome fact. We must believe that he 
 is good in himself, infinitely good, and 
 that he is " good unto all," and that " his 
 
CHRIST THE LEADER OF FAITH. 77 
 
 " tender mercies are over all his W( >iks ; '* 
 — most gladsome and grand realities. We 
 must believe that his will is good-will, — 
 his will in relation to what he himself is 
 to do, and his will in relation to what we, 
 in our little spheres of operation, ought to 
 do. And truly it is a gladsome fact that 
 this his will is in all respects good-will. 
 We must believe, too, that lieaven is his 
 home, that it is the city that hath " the 
 " foundations," — whither, as towards oui 
 own sweet home, we should in the spirit 
 of pilgrims, be daily travelling, each day's 
 journey being "a day's march nearer home.'* 
 It was gladsome believing of this kind 
 that animated the bosoms of Abraham 
 and Isaac and Jacob, and Enoch, and 
 Noah, who all " declared plainly that they 
 " were seeking a country," who " confessed 
 " that they were strangers and pilgrims 
 " on the earth," and that their faces were 
 set Zionwards. " They desired a better 
 " country, that is, an heavenly," and they 
 saw their way into it made clear and 
 
Pf 
 
 T8 
 
 <i cy 
 
 SAVING faith:' 
 
 strai^'lit, " for tliey saw the day of Jesus 
 " afar off, and were ^dad." 
 
 " These all lived and died in faith," and 
 left lis a noble example. They have gone 
 before, and yet they are intently and in- 
 tensely interested in those who are coming 
 after. They stoop down, or bend over 
 their parapeted glory, to be witnesses of 
 our progress. They line in spirit the 
 pathway of our ascent, that in spirit they 
 may cheer us on. " Wherefore, seeing we 
 " are compassed about with so great a 
 " cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside 
 " every weight and the sin which doth 
 " so easilv beset us, and let us run with 
 " patience the race (of faith) that is set 
 " before us, looking unto Jesus, the Leader 
 " and the Finisher of Faith," — looking 
 unto Jesus, the greatest, the most per- 
 sistent, the most triumphant of all be- 
 lievers. He is the Leader of the 'whole 
 company of believers. They believe on 
 him, — they believe in him, — as the only 
 propitiation for their sins. They believe 
 
VHRIST THE LEADER OF FAITH. 
 
 79 
 
 3U« 
 
 llljr 
 
 on him and in him as their Leader, who 
 was very tar indeed from living in a 
 merely sensuous manner while on earth, 
 — who was very far indeed from seekin;^: 
 as the great object of life the thinj^s that 
 appeal to the desire of the eye, the things 
 that appeal to the desires of the flesh, the 
 things that minister to the pride and 
 pomp of terrestrial life. He rose suh- 
 lime, in the whole of his earthly career, 
 amid and above all such objects. His 
 eye was turned to things spiritual, to 
 things celestial and eternal. He lived a 
 spiritual life on earth. He lived a hea- 
 venly life. He lived a God-like life. He 
 communed from the beginning to the 
 ending of his career with things unseen, 
 things eternal, things heavenly and divine. 
 He communed, that is to say, with the 
 things of faith. Never was there such 
 faith in the reality and transcendency 
 and glory of things unseen, and eternal, 
 and divine, as was wrapt up in the spirit 
 of Jesus. Never before, never since, was 
 
' I 
 
 80 
 
 ''SAViJsu faith:' 
 
 l!i 
 
 there such persistent and unfaltering 
 realization of the spiritual side of things, 
 — the everlasting side, — the divine side. 
 Never, in simple phrase, has there been 
 such believing. Hence it is that the 
 inspired writer, after saying — " let us run 
 " with patience the race that is set before 
 " us, looking unto Jesus the Leader and 
 " Finisher of faith," adds explanatorily, 
 " who, for the joy that was set before 
 " him," — and in which he had the most 
 unw^avering faith, — " endured the cross, 
 " despising the shame, and is set down at 
 *' the right hand of the throne of God. — 
 " For consider him that endured such con- 
 " tradiction of sinners against himself," — 
 consider how he had unwavering faith in 
 the glory wherewith his endurance was 
 by and by to be crowned, — " lest ye be 
 " wearied and faint in your minds. — Ye 
 *' have not yet resisted unto blood, striv- 
 " ing against sin." 
 
 It is true, then, that Christ's faith was 
 a complete and completely finislicd thing. 
 
SUBSTANCE OF THINGS HOPED FOR. 81 
 
 He finished it. It was perfect. He wafi 
 " the finisher of faith," — the great Exem- 
 plar, who, by the example of his own sub- 
 limely spiritual life, has shown us the way 
 to live by that faith which is "the sub- 
 " stance of things hoped for, the evidence 
 " of things not seen." 
 
 A* 
 
 FAITH THE " SUBSTANCE OF 
 THINGS HOPED FOB:' 
 
 " Faith is the suhstancz of things lioped 
 "for!* So says the inspired writer of the 
 Epistle to the Hebrews, in the first 
 verse of the eleventh chapter. And 
 very likely he knew well enough, while 
 penning the words, tliat he was not 
 giving a description of faith which would 
 be intelligible at a glance to every child 
 and childish mind. Very likely he 
 intended that the words should be food 
 for mature meditation. He was accus- 
 
 d2 
 
i 
 
 82 
 
 " c 
 
 SAVING FAITH.'' 
 
 \j 
 
 tomed to discriminate between ideas of 
 milk and ideas of meaty (chap. 5, 12 — 
 14) ; and most probably he would be 
 quite well aware that his words here were 
 " strong meat," which would require 
 prolonged mastication and strong diges- 
 tion, that they might be thoroughly 
 triturated, assimilated, and made their 
 own, by the minds of his readers. 
 
 While it is matter of great gratitude 
 that there is abundance of milk for babes 
 in the Kevelation of the mmd of God, 
 it is also matter of almost equal grati- 
 tude that there are other elements and 
 aspects of things that require far more 
 than an infantile apprehension to master 
 and make use of. It would have been a 
 pity if there had been nothing in " the 
 volume of the Book " to task our mental 
 powers, and to keep* us recurring, and 
 recurring, with renewed effort and energy, 
 to the invigorating engagement of adding 
 research to research, and thinking to 
 thinking, till, after overcoming every sue- 
 
 
SUBSTANCE OF THINGS HOPED FOR, 83 
 
 cessive difficulty, we at last achieve suc- 
 cess, and stand on the elevated platform 
 of view which was occupied by the in- 
 spired writers, and by the Spirit of God 
 who inspired them. It is well that in 
 the ample domain of Scripture there are 
 lofty mountains and deep ravines, as well 
 as level plains. 
 
 What, then, is it that the inspired 
 writer means, when he says that " Faith 
 " is the substance of things hoped for " ? 
 
 There is something in the statement 
 that is sufficiently obvious. Faith has 
 to do with thincfs hoped for. Not indeed 
 with these things only. It has to do 
 with multitudes of other things, as is 
 evidenced by the writer's second affirma- 
 tion, in which he says that faith is " the 
 " evidence of thinfjs not seen" That is a 
 wider sphere of things than things hoped 
 for. Faith, in so far as it can occupy 
 itself at all, must deal with "things not 
 " seen," — things that are beyond the reach 
 of sight, and hearing, smelling, tasting. 
 
 li 
 
84 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' ' ^ ^ A '. • 
 
 touclmuf. And among these things, are 
 the things that we hope for. 
 
 Besides the unseen things that we hope 
 foTy there are indeed multitudes of other 
 unseen things, with which our faith has 
 to do. For example, it has to do with 
 God. (Heb. xi, 6.) He is not seen, 
 though he is not one of the things hoped 
 for. Things hoped for are to us in the 
 future ; but God is in the past and the 
 present as well as the future. Faith, 
 again, has to do, as the inspired writer 
 reminds us (Heb. xi, 3), with the crea- 
 tion of the world. " By faith we under- 
 " stand that the worlds were framed by 
 " the word of God, so that things which 
 " are seen were not made of things which 
 " do appear." This divine creation of the 
 worlds is to us a thing unseen, but not a 
 thing hoped for. 
 
 Christian faith, also, hfs much to do 
 with Christy ns he * w.fs * cjhtii upon the 
 earth. It has to do wiJi what he then 
 taught, with what he then did, v.ith 
 
SUBSTANCE OF THINGS HOPED FOR. 85 
 
 what he then suffered. Did he teach for 
 our sake as well as for the sake of others ? 
 Christian faith has to do with that. Did 
 he live on earth for our sake as well as 
 for the sake of others ? Christian faith 
 has to do with that ? Did he think of 
 us, when he was down here ? Did he 
 look forward to us ? Did he feel for us ? 
 Did he take our sins, — yes, ours ? Did 
 he lay them on himself ? Did he bear 
 them to the cross ? Did he bear them on 
 the cross ? Did he make full propitiation 
 or satisfaction for them all ? Did he, or 
 did he not ? Faith, Christian faith, 
 saving faith, has much to do with all that. 
 And it is in such things as these — long 
 ages past — that Christian hope for the 
 future finds a firm and sure foundation 
 on which to rest. 
 
 But, while all this is the case, it is 
 equally true that faith has much to do 
 with what is future and " hoped for." It 
 has much to do with everlasting bliss 
 and glory and honour. Is there to be a 
 
''SAVING FAITH." 
 
 V^, 
 
 J 
 
 future existence ? Js it possible for this 
 future existence to be a state of glory ? 
 May cnir future existence, notwithstand- 
 ing our woful sinfulness, be a state of 
 life rjither than of death ? May it be a 
 state of blessedness ? Will it be ? Will 
 heaven be our home ? Shall we be 
 admitted to the fellowship of angels and 
 archangels ? Shall we get to a position 
 that will be within sight of the throne ? 
 Faith has to do with these (juestions. 
 Christian faith answers them all in a 
 gloriously unwavering affirmative. And 
 thus this Christian faith is "the substance 
 " of thinr/s hoped for." 
 
 Their suhsfance ! AVhat means the 
 inspired writer ? What can he 
 mean ? 
 
 We all know more or less about the 
 meaning of the word "substance." When 
 we take a piece of wood in our hand, we 
 say. This is a certain kind of mhsfa7icr. 
 It is quite a diflerent kind of thing from 
 iron. Iron, too, we denominate a svhstance. 
 
 j 
 
SUBSTANCE OF THINGS HOPED FOR. 87 
 
 the 
 he 
 
 As such, it is very different from silver 
 or j2[old. We speak of hard suhstances 
 and soft suhstances, rough suhstances and 
 smooth, malleable suhstances and brittle, 
 solid suhstances and fluid, and vapoury 
 and gaseous suhstances. Then philoso- 
 phers step in and speak of mental suh- 
 stances. They tell us that every mind is 
 a suhstancCy though a sjnritual suhstance, 
 and therefore a very different suhstance 
 from flesh, or bones, or brains, or wood, or 
 stone, or iron. Tlien, too, we are accus- 
 tomed to speak of the suhstance of a sermon, 
 or the suhstance of a poem, or of a book. 
 We speak of the suhstance of a conversa- 
 tion. And speaking of this same suh- 
 stance, we often call it the sum and 
 suhstance of the whole matter in liand. 
 We say, moreover, at other times, that 
 such and such a book, or pamphlet, or 
 sermon, or address, has little suhstance 
 in it. And reverting from these spiritual 
 or intellectual things to things material, 
 we say, perhaps of this fabric or of tliat, 
 
 
 (i! 
 
88 
 
 ** SAVING FAITH. 
 
 n 
 
 v\ 
 
 or even of this kind of food or of that, it 
 has little svhstance in it. 
 
 Now, what is the meaning of this word 
 " substance," which is so freely used in 
 reference to so many different things ? It 
 cannot mean what is hard; for though 
 iron is hard, water is not, neither is gas ; 
 and yet both of these are as really sub- 
 stances as iron. And then if it meant 
 what was hard, it could not be applied 
 to minds, and sermons, and poems, and 
 such like things. Every soft thing as 
 well as every hard thing, is a substance. 
 It is a soft substance. So every red 
 thing is a red substance. And every 
 sweet thing is a sweet substance. Every 
 tall thing is a tall substance ; and every 
 broad thing is a broad substance. 
 
 What, then, is this substance (this sub- 
 stantia, this vTroa-racrig) ? What is the 
 real meaning of the word ? It is this — 
 that lohich is standing under. That is 
 its real meaning ; and we shall never 
 fully understand the various applications 
 
SVBHTANCE OF THINGS HOPED FOR. 89 
 
 of the word, unless we carry with us the 
 idea, that a substance is something standing 
 under. When we lift a bit of iron, and 
 feel it hard and heavy, we say — That is 
 a liard and heavy substance. What do 
 we mean ? We feel hardness. We feel 
 heaviness. But there is more than hard- 
 ness and heaviness in our hand. There 
 is something standing under the hardness 
 and the heaviness. That something is 
 the substance we call iron. When we 
 lift a handful of down, we feel it to be soft 
 and light. What do we man ? We feel 
 softness and lightness, liut there is more 
 in our hand than the feeling of softness 
 and lightness. There is a thing that is 
 soft and light. There is, in other words, 
 something standing under the softness 
 and lightness which we feel. There is, 
 that is to say, a substance. The down 
 is a substance light and soft. When we 
 taste sugar, we feel sweetness, and we say, 
 there is sweetness in it. In it ? In 
 what ? In that which is under and 
 
IK) 
 
 ''SAVING FAITH." 
 
 w 
 
 standing' under the sweetness, — in the 
 substance of the sugar. In all other 
 cases, when the term is legitimately used, 
 it has the same meaning. The substance 
 of water is that which is standing under 
 the fluidity. The substance of steam is 
 that which is standing under the vapour. 
 It is, indeed, the very same substance 
 that is standing under the fluidity of 
 water, and the solidity of ice. The sub- 
 stance of every mind, also, is that which 
 is standing under its power and acts or 
 states of thinking, feeling, and willing. 
 The substance of a sermon is that which 
 is standing under all its explanations, 
 and illustrations, and argumentations. 
 The substance of a poem is that which is 
 standing under the entire superstructure 
 of its imagery and mental music. The 
 sum and substance of a speech is that 
 which gathers up all that was said into 
 its essence, and which was really stand- 
 ing under every head and particular of 
 thought. A speech without any sub- 
 
SUBSTANCE OF THING'S HOPED FOR. 91 
 
 stance, is a speech whose words aiul 
 ])lirases iind images and arguments go for 
 nothing, as really having nothing at all 
 standing under them that is wortliy of 
 consideration. And food too, without 
 suhstance, would he food that may have 
 bulk indeed, and the appearance of what 
 is nourishing, but which has really little 
 or no nourishing properties standing 
 under these appearances. 
 
 We have now before our minds what 
 a substance is. But how does this help 
 us to understand what the inspired writer 
 means when he says — " Faith is the sub- 
 '' stance of things hoped for " ? Is it the 
 case that faith is sometimes standing 
 under the heavenly things hoped for by 
 all Christian believers ? Yes, this is the 
 case. Faith is the condition of standing 
 under the heavenly things hoped for. The 
 heavenly things, as things hoped for, 
 inhere in faith. And thus faith is 
 stamiing umler them, so far as they are 
 hoped for. Is the reader puzzled ? Then, 
 

 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-S) 
 
 K<i^ 
 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 1.1 
 
 mU^ UTS 
 
 u US 
 
 I U£ 12.0 
 
 m 
 
 
 1 — ill ' ^ '-^ 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 6" 
 
 ► 
 
 '^z 
 
 
 
 '/ 
 
 I^iotographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 CorpQralion 
 
 23 WIST MAIN STRUT 
 
 WIBSTIR,N.Y. MSrM 
 
 (716)t7a-4S03 
 
 
 rr'hiMaLM^Tfaiimlr»<iirflriiiSitf5^a 
 
 :-sl««HS>;.-.3?(-»W«!fmP»T^;?T 
 

 m 
 
 \ 
 
 % 
 
 !^ 
 

 « 
 
 92 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 for a moment or two, transpose the words 
 standing under, and part of the iiispired 
 writer's idea — though of course only a 
 jpart — will become transparent. Faith 
 is the condition of under-standing the 
 heavenly things hoped for. Is not light 
 now looking in ? Faith in some of its 
 relations, is a kind of standing-imder ; 
 and such a kind of standing-under as is 
 kindred to under-standing. Christian 
 faith is, in an important sense, staTtding- 
 tender, or umler-standingy the heavenly 
 things hoped for. Whatever we under- 
 stand, that we stand-under. We not only 
 look at its surface, and on this side of it, 
 and that ; we go down to its foundation. 
 We search into its basis. We go under- 
 neath it, as it were, and stand under- 
 neath. Then we under-stand it. Do 
 we under-stand an argument, for in- 
 stance, on ojvy disputed point ? If we 
 do, then we have not only examined its 
 surface, or superficies, and gone over in 
 detail the points that strike everybody's 
 
SUBSTANCE OF THINGS HOPED FOR. 93 
 
 ords 
 
 light 
 
 view ; we go farther into our investiga- 
 tion. We go to the bottom of the sub- 
 subject. We go farther still. We wish 
 to see what it is on which it rests, what 
 it is that is underneath it altogether. 
 We must judge whether or not that 
 which is underneath it is sufficient to 
 support it. Hence we need, in our 
 search, to go down and stand under- 
 neath the whole intellectual erection. 
 When we go down in this manner, we 
 understand it. Now faith is a kind of 
 understanding. All faith is a kind of 
 under-standing: and Christian faith is a 
 kind of under-standing of the heavenly 
 things hoped for. It is, for instance, 
 understanding that they really are. It 
 is understanding that they are the gifts 
 of a Father's love. It is understanding 
 that they are given through the glorious 
 propitiation accomplished by the Son's 
 death upon the cross. It is understand- 
 ing that they are free to all, and reserved 
 in heaven for all them who joyfully anti- 
 
 '■4. 
 
 :1' 
 
 f 
 
 
 i 
 
 ; 
 
iHi 
 
 ' ' 
 
 i' 
 
 'r 
 
 i: I 
 
 ii 
 
 94 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 cipate them, and who walk, and run, and 
 live, on earth by faith that terminates on 
 them. This is Christian faith in relation 
 to heavenly things. It is at once an 
 under -standing and a standing -under. 
 He icho lias the faith stands under the 
 things hoped for, as things hoped for. 
 Heaven is above his soul, — heaven as 
 his hoped-for home. He looks up as he 
 stands under, and he understands. He 
 sees not merely the stars that stud the 
 sky, — he sees beyond the sky, into the 
 interior of the temple not made with 
 hands, and he beholds at the right hand 
 of the Majesty, Jesus his Saviour and his 
 Advocate. The things hoped for — as 
 Jwped for — dip down into, and inhere in 
 his faith. His faith is, as it were, their 
 subjective substrate, or ground.'^ 
 
 Hence it is that the word which is 
 translated substance in the text, and very 
 
 1 *' Faith gives, thus, things hoped for, and as they 
 are hoped for, a real subsistence in the minds and 
 soui<3 of them that do believe." — Owen, Exposition of 
 Hebrews, in loc. 
 
SUBSTANCE OF THINGS HOPED FOR. 95 
 
 literally and correctly so translated, is 
 rendered ground in the margin. It is 
 the rendering of Lefevre and Calvin. 
 
 It is also renderend confidence, and 
 quite properly so. This is the rendering 
 given in the versions of Luther, Tyndale, 
 and Coverdale ; and it is approved of by 
 such critics as Bohme, Bleek, de Wette, 
 Ebrard, Moses Stuart, Delitzsch, Alford. 
 He who in his soul stands-under, and 
 thus far under -stands, the heavenly 
 things hoped for, is confident in reference 
 to them. His standing under, and his 
 understanding, is confidence. He is con- 
 fident that the things really are ; that 
 they are altogether glorious; that they 
 are gloriously free, — the purchase of the 
 blood of him who shed his blood as " a 
 " ransom for all. His faith is, thus, con- 
 fidence. (Compare 2 Cor. ix, 4 ; xi, 17 ; 
 Heb. iii, 14.) But it is a departure 
 from accuracy to translate the word as 
 Grotius, Cameron, Ernesti, Rosenmuller, 
 and Kuinol do, expectation. The confi- 
 
 if 
 
 
i 
 
 
 96 
 
 II 
 
 SAVING FAITHr 
 
 dence of ' expectation ' is not identical 
 with the confidence of ' iinderstandimj! 
 It is its result. 
 
 FAITH " THE EVIDENCE 
 OF THINGS NOT SEEN'' 
 
 Faith is the evidence of things not 
 seen. This is the other and simpler part 
 of the description of faith, that is given 
 by the inspired writer of the Epistle to 
 the Hebrews (xi, 1). 
 
 He is not referring to logical evidence, 
 properly so called. Such logical evidence 
 is not itself faith, but the substrate and 
 reason of faith. The mind needs logical 
 evidence to warrant its belief. The in- 
 spired writer is referring to a species of 
 psychological evidence. He means that the 
 things not seen evidence themselves, psy- 
 chologically, by means of faith. They 
 make themselves evident to the mind by 
 means of faith, v n : < . n 
 
 uij'iio:)}! 
 
 I - 
 
EVIDENCE OF THINGS NOT SEEN. 97 
 
 The word rendered evidence may also 
 be rendered demonstration or proof. " The 
 " things hoped for " demonstrate, or show, 
 or p7we, themselves to the mind by means 
 of faith. Things visible evidence them- 
 selves to the mind by means of the eye ; 
 things tangible by means of the touch ; 
 things audible by means of the ears. 
 And so things that are beyond all 3ur 
 outer senses, things in heaven, the glorious 
 invisibilities that are there, evidence and 
 prove and demonstrate themselves to the 
 mind, by means of faith, — faith in the 
 testimony of God, written or unwritten. 
 
 The eye is the evidence we have for 
 what we see. The touch is the evidence 
 we have for what we feel. The ear is 
 the evidence we have for what we hear. 
 And, in like manner, faith — faith in the 
 sure testimony of God — is the evidence 
 we have for the heavenly invisibilities 
 which we hope for. By it we under- 
 stand them and find thera present to our 
 
 contemplation. Happy, therefore, is the 
 
 s 
 
 ft 
 
 
I 
 
 •if i: 
 
 ii 
 
 98 
 
 "SAVING faith:* 
 
 man whose life on earth is " a life of 
 "faith." He keeps the earth under his 
 feet ; and he sees heaven overarching his 
 soul. He sojourns down here as in a 
 strange country, admitting and profess- 
 ing that he is a pilgrim. He declares 
 plainly that he desires a better country 
 — an heavenly. (Heb. xi, 8 — 16.) His 
 loins are girt. His heart is elate. His 
 aims are sublime. His whole demeanour 
 is a beautiful and solemn preparation for 
 glory, honour, and immortality. 
 
 NO FEAR OF 
 BELIEVING THE EIGHT THING 
 IN A WRONG WAY, 
 
 There is really no fear of believing the 
 right thing in a wrong wo.y. 
 
 There is very great danger of turning 
 the attention of the mind to the wrong 
 thing. Or if the object contemplated be 
 the right thing in the main, there is yet 
 
BELIEVING THE RIGHT THING, 
 
 99 
 
 
 considerable danger of carrying to it, and 
 spreading over it, some wrong idea, through 
 which it is distortingly apprehended. 
 
 There is danger too of the mind be- 
 coming arrested on the superficies of mere 
 words, — though the words are in them- 
 selves the right words, and indeed the 
 very best words imaginable. It is the 
 thoughts behind the words, and the things 
 behind the thoughts, that are the all-im- 
 portant realities. It is Christ Himself, 
 or God in Christ, who is the Eeality of 
 realities. The mind must go to Him. It 
 must never rest on any stepping-stone 
 that keeps it out of sight of Him. 
 
 There is also danger of men looking to 
 their act of faith, instead of looking 
 through it to the Glorious Object. But 
 if you look to the telescope, instead of 
 through it, you will never see th6 rings of 
 Saturn or the satellites of Jupiter. 
 
 Faith is eating, as it were. " I am the 
 " living bread," says Jesus, " which came 
 " down from heaven ; if any man eat of 
 
 ■. i' 
 
 H 
 
 1 
 
 I 
 
100 
 
 ''SAVING FAITH.'' 
 
 " this bread, he shall live for ever." 
 (John vi, 51.) If the right bread be set 
 before men, when they are hungry, there 
 is little danger of them getting no good 
 from what they ept, hecmtse they eat it in 
 a wrong way. If you were to see two 
 men eating hungrily, each a piece of 
 bread ; and if the one were immediately 
 to sicken and die, while the other was 
 refreshed and invigorated, would you 
 naturally suspect the manner of eating, 
 and have no suspicion whatever in refer- 
 ence to the thing eaten ? Would you 
 naturally say — No dovht they hoth ate 
 what ivas very good in itself : hut unhap- 
 pily the one ate and masticated his morsel 
 in a very wrong way. Would you not 
 rather suspect that the difference of result 
 vas to be attributed to the difference of 
 what was eaten ? Would you not suspect 
 that, while in the one case the thing 
 eaten was wholesome, in the other it was 
 poisonous ? 
 
 Faith, again, is looking as it were. 
 
BELIEVING THE RIGHT THING. 101 
 
 Suppose yourself in the midst of the 
 cauip of the dying Israelites. Two men 
 are lying before you who have been bitten 
 by the fiery Hying serpents. Moses calls 
 to them both to look to the brazen serpent 
 and he healed. The one complies, and 
 turns round and looks up, and is instantly 
 healed. The other thinks it an absurdity 
 that a mortal wound can be healed by 
 looking to a piece of brass ; and he turns 
 away his eyes and looks at some other 
 object, and expires. What is the reason 
 of the difference in the two men's condi- 
 tion ? Both looked ; and so far as the 
 act of looking is concerned, they looked 
 equally well. Why then did the one die 
 while the other lived ? The one looked at 
 the right object ; the other did not. 
 
 Faith is coming, as it were. It is 
 coming to Jesus. There is no fear of 
 coming to him by a wrong road. If a 
 man only get to the right point, it matters 
 very little, in all ordinary cases, by what 
 way he arrives. The great difficulty is 
 
 1 1 
 
 % 
 
 ■%\ 
 
 ',■1 1 
 
 % 
 
t 
 
 102 
 
 "SAVING faith:' 
 
 ill getting to the right ohject, not in get- 
 ting to it by a right way. 
 
 V I 
 
 TRYING TO BELIEVE. 
 
 There is probably something wrong 
 with a man's view of the Gospel, if he 
 be tryinrj to hdieve. 
 
 If a man say, / am trying to hdieve in 
 Jesus, — / am doing luhat I can, — and 
 trying as much as ever I am able, the 
 mental attitude indicated is not likely to 
 be right. It is too much akin to the 
 attitude of him who rather asks " Hoic 
 " am I to believe ?" than " What am I to 
 believe?" 
 
 A man might try to get himself 
 warmed at a painted fire. It would be 
 in vain. Whereas if once he should 
 have a real fire before him, he would in 
 all probability get warmed immediately, 
 without any trying in the matter. 
 
 So, if a sinner be believing something 
 
TRYING TO BELIEVE. 
 
 103 
 
 lihc the tratJi as it is in Jesus, as like it 
 as a painted fire is like a real one, and 
 yet only like it, he will never feel it 
 filling liini witli spiritual sensations of 
 comfort, and warming his heart with love 
 to God and love to man. As soon, how- 
 ever, as the real truth is befoi3 his mind, 
 — the real truth revealing behind its 
 transparency the Glorious Saviour, as a 
 Saviour who gave himself for all, and 
 finished for each all that is needed for 
 his salvation, — then, unless he wilfully 
 turn away, he will feel his soul filled with 
 peace and joy and fired with gratitude 
 and love. 
 
 If a man come into a room where there 
 are only lilies, it would be in vain for 
 him to try hard to smell roses. There 
 are no roses there for him to smell. Let 
 him go, however, into a room where there 
 are roses, and only roses, and he will feel 
 their fragrance immediately, without try- 
 ing at all. In like manner, if a sinner 
 has present to his mind truths which are 
 
 
104 
 
 *' SAVING FAITH.'' 
 
 only somewhat kindred to the Gospel, it 
 will be in vain for him to try to believe 
 the truth as it is in Jesus, The truth as 
 it is in Jesus is just there to be believed. 
 But if once he have the real truth as it 
 is in Jesus, and the real Jesus in that 
 truth, fairly present to his mind, he will 
 be able to believe immediately without 
 trying at all. 
 
 ii II 
 
 H 
 
 m 
 
 SAVING FAITH THE RECEPTION OF 
 THE TESTIMONY OF GOD. 
 
 The Apostle John says, in his General 
 Epistle (v, 9 — 11), "If we receive the 
 " witness of men, the witness of God is 
 " greater ; for this is the witness of God, 
 " which he hath testified of his Son. He 
 that believeth on the Son of God hath 
 
 the witness in himself: he that believ- 
 " eth not God hath made him a liar ; 
 " because he believeth not the record that 
 " God gave of his Son. And this is the 
 
 « 
 
 (( 
 
RECEPTIOK OF GOD'S TESTIMONY. 105 
 
 " record, that God hath given to us eter- 
 " nal life, and this life is in his Son." 
 
 This is an exceedingly instructive 
 passage. The famous Scottish theolo- 
 gian Boston found it, " in his extremity," 
 to be " the sweet and comfortable prop 
 " of his soul." From that time onward, 
 he made the passage one of the chief 
 themes of his ministry. The writer's 
 father, too, found peace in its represen- 
 tations, — peace, and something in addi- 
 tion that was the principle of an entirely 
 new career of life. 
 
 1. Note the words ivitness and record. 
 It is but one term in the original which 
 receives the two translations. It is the 
 same term that is rendered testimony in 
 Johniii, 32, 33 ; v, 34 ; viii, 17 ; xxi, 24; 
 Acts xxii, 18 ; Eev. i, 2, 9 ; vi, 9 ; xi, 7; 
 xii, 11, 17; xix, 10. The whole passage 
 might have been correctly and appropri- 
 ately thus rendered, — " If we receive the 
 " testimony of men, the testimony of God 
 
 " is greater ; for this is the testimony of 
 
 £ 2 
 
 \ 
 
 f:i 
 
lOG 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 '.'■A 
 
 " (?ocl, that (on) he has testified of his 
 " Son. He that belie veth on the Son of 
 *' God hath the testimony in himself ; he 
 *' that belie veth not God hath made him 
 *' a liar ; because he belie veth not on (e/V) 
 *' the testimony that God gave of his Son. 
 *' And this is the testimony, that God hath 
 " given to us eternal life, and this life is 
 " in his Son." In the Kheims version of 
 the N"ew Testament, it is the word testi- 
 mony that is used in all the clauses. In 
 Wyclifie's version the corresponding word 
 loitnesshuie is employed throughout. 
 
 2. " The testimony that God gave of 
 " his Son," is the testimony that he gave 
 by " the Spirit, the water, and the blood " 
 (ver. 8). It is the Gospel, It is the Glad 
 Tidings of salvation for sinners. The 
 tidings are true in all their elements. 
 Spiritual, Baptismal, Sacrificial. They 
 are God's testimony, No other one but 
 Himself could inform us whether he was 
 willing and wishing to save sinners. No 
 other one could inform us whether the 
 
RECEPTION OF GOD'S TESTIMONY. 107 
 
 way was clear for us to obtain, or for him 
 to dispense, the wonderful gift of " ever- 
 " lasting life." Hence his testimony was 
 needed. Being needed, it was given. 
 
 3. God's Testimony or Record or Gospel 
 — he it remarked in passing — amounts 
 to this, — " God hath given to us eternal 
 " life, and this life is in his Son." God 
 hath made a gift to us of eternal life ; 
 and this life is in his Son. (Compare 
 Eom. vi, 23.) Such is the idea of the 
 " beloved disciple ;" and hence he adds, — 
 *• he that hath the Son hath life ; he that 
 " hath not the Son of God hath not life." 
 
 Boston and the " Marrow-men " used 
 to draw special attention to the words 
 " to us" in this testimony or record or 
 Gospel. The Gospel, they reasoned, is 
 good news to " all nations," and to all in 
 " all nations," — to " every creature ; " 
 and hence when it is testified in this 
 universal Gospel, that God has made a 
 gift " to us " of eternal life, the fulness of 
 the divine meaning, and of the divine 
 
 I 
 
 i 
 
 w 
 
108 
 
 '* SAVING faith:' 
 
 generosity, is not apprehended, unless it 
 be clearly seen that the gift is to all with- 
 out distinction or exception, or, as Boston 
 and his fellow Marrow-men used to ex- 
 press it,^o us mankind-sinners as such. The 
 gift is really to you, my reader, " whoso- 
 " ever " you are, and whatsoever you have 
 been. The message of salvation, says Dr. 
 Chalmers, harmoniously with the Marrow- 
 men, " points the eye of each, and of every 
 " man, to an open heaven, and invites him 
 " to enter thereinto. Bv such terms as 
 " all and any and every and whosoever, it 
 " brings its offers of reconciliation most 
 " specifically to bear on each unit of the 
 " human population." ^ 
 
 4. He wJw believes the record is just he 
 who receives the testimony. Hence we see 
 what it is to believe tJie Gospel. It is to 
 think the thought of God regarding what 
 is " in" his Son, Christ Jesus. Saving faith 
 is thus, most certainly, a kind of thinking. 
 
 ^ Introductory Essay to Hall's Faith and Injluence 
 of the Gospel, p. xxiv. . . , , ... . . . ^ • 
 
FAITH A SETTING TO THE SEAL. 109 
 
 5. This view of saving faith is remark- 
 ably confirmed by the solemn declaration 
 that " he who believeth not God hath 
 " made him a liar" He is acting toward 
 God as if he were a liar. He treats God*s 
 glorious Gospel as if it were an untruth. 
 God and he contradict one another. The 
 man says " No " to God. Although God 
 assures him that it is the case that there 
 is a gift of eternal life, and that the gift 
 is to him and to all, yet he does not take 
 in the idea; and thus he not only dis- 
 honours the divine Testifier, he continues 
 uninfluenced by the sublime moral power 
 of the idea. He exists indeed ; but he 
 does not really live. He has not " ever- 
 " lasting life." 
 
 
 SETTING TO THE SEAL 
 THAT GOD IS TRUE. 
 
 It is said by John the Baptist, — " He 
 *' that hath received his testimony " — 
 
110 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 ^ f s 
 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 the testimony of the Son of God — " hath 
 " set to his seal that God is true" (John 
 iii, 33.) The expression throws illustra- 
 tive light on the nature of saving faith. 
 
 Not only is it the case that the he- 
 liever receives the testimony of Christ 
 concerning the Father, and the concur- 
 rent testimony of the Father concerning 
 Christ. It is also the case that, in re- 
 ceiving this testimony, he sets to his seal 
 that God is true,wheTesiS the unbeliever acts 
 as if God were not truthful. The believer 
 holds- for-true, ps the Germans express it, ^ 
 whatever God has testified. He is satis- 
 fied with the simple asseveration of the 
 living God. 
 
 Much, indeed, is " perilled " on that 
 simple asseveration. There are great 
 interests at stake. They are great at 
 all events to the sinner, — great in their 
 bearing on his bliss for time, and his 
 prospects for eternity. But the believer 
 does not hesitate. He just takes God 
 
 V " : •' "^ Filr-wahr-halt. ? -• ifi.ii:.'- 
 
FAITH A KIND] 01 HEARING, 
 
 111 
 
 " haf/f 
 
 (John 
 
 ustra- 
 
 ith. 
 
 le be- 
 hrist 
 
 3ncur- 
 eminij 
 
 in re- 
 is seal 
 er acts 
 eliever 
 3SS it, ^ 
 5 satis- 
 of the 
 
 at his word, — a tine old-fashioned defini- 
 tion of saving faith. He could not do 
 otherwise, for he "has set to liis seal 
 " that God is true." 
 
 The act and fact of faith is thus an 
 acknowledgment of confidence in the 
 divine veracity. And hence saving faith 
 itself is that kind of thinking which re- 
 sponds unfalteringly to the evangelical 
 Testimony of God. It recognizes in the 
 divine veracity the ground of its own 
 " assurance," and of the " full assurance " 
 of that " lively hope," which is the anti- 
 cipation of " glory, honour, and inimoi tal- 
 "ity." (Heb. vi, 11.) 
 
 if 
 
 ^^i 
 
 n that 
 great 
 eat at 
 L their 
 id his 
 iliever 
 ? God 
 
 ■ ! 1 
 
 FAITH A KIND 
 OF HEARING AND SEEING. 
 
 The Apostle Paul asks the Galatians, 
 who had vacillated in their faith, the 
 following question, — " This only would I 
 " learn of you. Received yt> the Spirit by 
 
112 
 
 ** SAVING FAITH.'' 
 
 " the 'Works of the law, or hy the licaring 
 " of faith ? " (Gal. iii, 2 .) The apostle admits 
 and assumes that the Galatian believers 
 had received " the Spirit." They had 
 received all those influences that were 
 needful in their peculiar circumstances. 
 They had received the specific efflux that 
 resulted in miracles. (Chap, iii, 5.) 
 They had received the more generic 
 efflux that resulted in the inward flow 
 and glow of " love, joy, peace, longsufler- 
 " ing, gentleness, goodness, faith (or faith- 
 " fulness), meekness, temperance." (See 
 Chap. V, 22.) These, says the Apostle, 
 are " the fruit of the Spirit." They are 
 " earnests " of the glory that is yet to be. 
 They are earnests which are needful for 
 all cycles of time, and in all circum- 
 stances of outward condition. They are 
 generically needful. 
 
 The Galatian believers had thus "re- 
 "ceived the Spirit;" and the Apostle 
 asks them whether they had received 
 His gifts " by the works of the law," 
 
FAITH A KIND OF HEARING. 
 
 113 
 
 hearmg 
 admits 
 elievers 
 ey had 
 it were 
 tances. 
 IX that 
 111, 0.) 
 generic 
 rd flow 
 gsuffer- 
 r faith- 
 (See 
 A^postle, 
 bey are 
 it to be. 
 Iful for 
 nrcum- 
 bey are 
 
 IS "re- 
 Ipostle 
 3ceived 
 } law," 
 
 that is, hy ohedience to the ^ascriptions 
 of the ceremonial or moral law, " or by 
 " the hearing of faith." We know that it 
 was by " the hearing of faith." But 
 note the expression. It denotes the hear- 
 ing into which faith resolves itself, or of 
 which it consists. It thus graphically 
 represents /ai^/i as hearing. 
 
 The representation is very instructive. 
 It teaches us that, in exercising faith, 
 we do not need to turn inward to feel, 
 Neither do we need to turn inward to 
 will. We need to turn outward to 
 hear. 
 
 It is assumed that One is addressing 
 us, who may be heard, and who is 
 worthy of being heard. It is assumed 
 that he brings a message to us. It is 
 assuiiied that his message is true. It is 
 assumed that it is from God. The 
 message is divine. So is the messenger. 
 He is from God. He is God. It is God 
 the Holy Spirit wlw speaks. In Him 
 the Son speaks. In Him the Father 
 
 I 
 
 1 ? c 
 
 f ; 
 
 ■ 1 
 
 1;' 
 
 "im 
 
114 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 speaks. They unitedly speak to ns. 
 The tliree-one God speaks to all. His 
 voice is directed to men as men. He 
 "cries aloud, and spares not." He says, 
 " Unto you, men, I call ; and my voice 
 " is to the children of men ": — " hearken 
 " unto me " : — " he that heareth shall 
 " live," — he shall have peace, and joy, and 
 lively hope, and holiness, and everlasting- 
 life : — " earth, earth, earth, hear the 
 " word of the Lord and live " : — " Why 
 "wilt thou die?" 
 
 "VVe thus see the proper attitude of 
 the soul in putting forth the exercise of 
 faith. It is the attitude of a hearer in 
 oblation to a Divine Speaker, — the attitude 
 of a listener, a receiver of good news as 
 by the ear. Faith is heai^ing. 
 
 Or, if any prefer a transference to 
 another of the recipient senses, faith is 
 seeing. It is looking, — looking unto 
 Jesus. "As Moses lifted up the serpent 
 in the wilderness," that whosoever looked 
 to it might live, even so has the Son of 
 
He 
 
 FAITH A KIND OF SEEING, 
 
 115 
 
 Man been lifted up, that whosoever looks- 
 to him " mi^lit not perish but have ever- 
 lasting life." (John iii, 14, 15.) Look, 
 the sight is glorious ! " Look unto nie/' 
 He calls aloud, " and be ye saved, all the 
 ends of the earth." (Isaiah xlv, 22.) 
 Look, then, serpent-bitten sinner. 
 Look now. Lo, your sin was on the 
 Lamb of God. He bore it eighteen 
 hundred and fifty years ago. He bore it 
 away. He hore it out of the luay which 
 leads up to God and to glory. 
 
 The brave old African chief, who had 
 been led by Mr. Moffat to think of 
 heavenly things, came, in his dream, to 
 a mountain, — vast, precipitous, and insur- 
 mountable. It stretched right across the 
 pathway that led to the home of his 
 heart. What was he to do ? It was 
 the mountain of his iniquities. As he 
 looked, his spirit failed him. He gazed 
 wistfully from point to point of the vast 
 expanse, and scanned, and scanned again, 
 the whole frowning mass, to see if there 
 
no 
 
 ''SAVING FAITH." 
 
 was any trace of a possible pathway. 
 But there was none. He wept in an 
 agony of distress. What was he to do ? 
 He looked higher ; and lo, as he looked, 
 a drop of hloocl descended from heaven 
 on the mountains peak, and immediately 
 the whole tremendous mass melted away. 
 The way was clear ! The way is still 
 clear. It is clear, not by your efforts, 
 sinner, but by the grace of the great 
 Saviour. 
 
 BELIEF OF THE GOSPEL 
 NOT A PECULIAR KIND OF BELIEVING. 
 
 The words FAITH, belief, and believ- 
 ing, have the same meaning in the Bible, 
 which they have in the language of ordi- 
 nary life. They describe a certain act 
 or exercise of the mind which is one 
 and uniform whatever the object we be- 
 lieve. The phrases / believe it, I don't 
 believe it — / believe in him, I don't be- 
 lieve in him, are expressions which every 
 
NO PECULIAR KIND OF BELIEVINd. 117 
 
 person is usin^' almost every day of liis 
 life ; and in these expressions the word 
 believe describes precisely the same act or 
 exercise of mind, which it describes when 
 John the Baptist says, " He that hdievdh 
 " on the Son hath everlasting life." (Jolni 
 iii, 36.) There is no difference between 
 the two states of the mind, so far as the 
 act of hclicving is concerned. If we know 
 exactly, therefore, what the word helievc 
 means in the language of ordinary life, 
 we know exactly what it means in the 
 inexpressibly important language of the 
 Bible. 
 
 It could not well be otherwise. For 
 did not the Holy Spirit, who animated 
 the Bible- writers, and who is therefore 
 the Divine Author of the Bible, intend 
 it to be understood ? Surely it could 
 not be his design to make the Bible a 
 Mystery, or an Enigma. He meant it to 
 be a lievelation. And hence, that he 
 might speak to us intelligibly, he made 
 use, not of his own divine and infinitely 
 
118 
 
 "SAVING FAITH.'' 
 
 ii:; 
 
 H 
 
 
 ' I' 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 i! 
 
 perfect language, such as he may employ 
 in his ineffable communings with the 
 Father and the Son, but of our human 
 and imperfect phraseology. And not 
 ■only does he employ our human words, 
 he employs them, as far as the circum- 
 stances will permit, in their ordinary 
 human acceptations. Our own words 
 would not otherwise be intelligible to us. 
 The Holy Spirit employs, for instance, in 
 addition to the word believing, multitudes 
 of such words as thinlcingy rememhering, 
 loving, hating, choosing, doubting, knowing. 
 But, if, while employing these words, he 
 metamorphosed or interchanged their 
 meanings, his communications would be 
 •either unintelligible or misleading. If, for 
 example, when using the word thinking he 
 meant by it loving or hating, how perplex- 
 ing it would be. If, when he says " Thou 
 *" shalt not kill," or when he still more 
 sublimely says " Thou shalt loi^e thy 
 *' neighbour as thyself," he neither meant 
 kill on the one hand, as men in general 
 
NO PECULIAR KIND OF BELIEVING. 119 
 
 inploy 
 
 h the 
 
 mmaii 
 
 d not 
 
 words, 
 
 ircum- 
 
 dinary 
 
 words 
 
 to us. 
 
 nee, in 
 
 titudes 
 
 hering, 
 
 lowing. 
 
 rds, he 
 
 their 
 uld be 
 
 If, for 
 king he 
 erplex- 
 " Thou 
 1 more 
 ve thy 
 meant 
 general 
 
 understood the word, nor love on the 
 other, such as men in general understand 
 by the term, of what use would the 
 statutes be ? It could not be said of 
 them, " The commandment of the Lord is 
 " pure, enlightening the eyes " — " more- 
 " over, by them is thy servant warned." 
 (Psalm xix, 8-11.) Nothing seems 
 clearer than that the Holy Spirit em- 
 ploys those common words in their com- 
 mon acceptations. When he uses the 
 word standing, he does not mean by it 
 lea^huf. If he speaks of running, he 
 does not mean sitting. He uses these 
 words in their ordinary acceptation. 
 And can we suppose that when he uses 
 the word believing, he means something 
 as different from common believing, as 
 thinking is from choosing, or as choosing 
 is from knoiving ? It surely cannot be. 
 
 If a master were to command his ser- 
 vant to 7'un, and were then to reprove 
 him because he did not stand, what would 
 we think of him ? And if God were to 
 
 I 
 
il ■ 
 
 V 
 
 f 
 
 120 
 
 "SAVING FAITH." 
 
 command men to helieve, and were then 
 to punish them for not doing something 
 as different from believing as standing is 
 from running, would he not be acting iu 
 an utterly inexplicable way ? 
 
 If there had been, indeed, an Inspired 
 Preface to the Bible, in which we were 
 instructed to understand all other words, 
 descriptive of the well-known objects of 
 human consciousness, in their ordinary 
 acceptations, but to beware of under- 
 standing the term believing in its usual 
 sense, and defining plainly the peculiar 
 sense which was to be attributed to it, 
 then we could easily have supposed that 
 the Holy Spirit had given to it some 
 extraordinary signification. But as there 
 is no such Prefatory Note, we seem to be 
 shut up to understand the term in its 
 common acceptation. 
 
 Moreover, it is an undenied and un- 
 deniable fact that the word believing is 
 frequently used, in the Bible, in its ordi- 
 nary acceptation. See, for instance. Acts 
 
NO PECULIAR KIND OF BELIEVING. 121 
 
 then 
 thing 
 Ing is 
 
 ng m 
 
 spired 
 were 
 words, 
 5cts of 
 linary 
 Linder- 
 usual 
 iculiar 
 to it, 
 d that 
 some 
 s there 
 to be 
 in its 
 
 id un- 
 ving is 
 ;s ordi- 
 e. Acts 
 
 ix, 26, where it is said, " When Saul was 
 " come to Jerusalem, he assayed to join 
 " himself to the disciples ; but they were 
 " afraid of him, and believed not that he 
 " was a disciple." Here the word helieved 
 is admitted on all hands to have its ordi- 
 nary meaning. See too Acts xxvii, 11, 
 where it is said, " Nevertheless, the cen- 
 " turion helieved the master and the owner 
 " of the ship more than those things that 
 " were spoken by Paul." Here also the 
 word is used undeniably in its ordinary 
 acceptation. Dr. John Erskine, — the 
 venerable correspondent of Jonathan 
 Edwards,— after referring to some similar 
 passages, remarks, — " I may venture to 
 " say. If Christians had consulted systems 
 " less, and Scripture and their own ex- 
 " perience more, they would not have 
 " affixed to believing in other passages a 
 " sense entirely different from what it 
 " bears in these." ^ See also Exod. iv, 
 
 ^ Dissertation on the Nature of Chrintian Faith, 
 §1. 
 
ii 
 
 i 
 
 I ( I 
 
 122 
 
 SAVING faith:' 
 
 1, 5 ; Jer. xii, G ; Matt, xxiv, 23 ; John 
 iv, 21 ; Acts xxiv, 14 ; xxvii, 25 ; xxviii, 
 24 ; Horn, xiv, 2, etc. In all these 
 passages the word is admittedly employed 
 in its ordinary acceptation. How ex- 
 tremely perplexing, then, it would be, if, 
 in multitudes of other passages, and more 
 especially in those that come home most 
 closely to our bosoms and our most im- 
 portant interests, the term were, without 
 any note or warning, used in a totally 
 different and altogether unexplained ac- 
 ceptation ! If the Bible were constructed 
 on such a principle, a man might guess, 
 indeed, at its meaning, but he could 
 scarcely be ever sure that he understood 
 it. He might accidentally alight upon 
 its true import, as some men draw prizes 
 out of a lottery, but it would be utterly 
 beyond his power to engage in a rational 
 and sober interpretation of " the words 
 which the Holy Ghost teacheth." " I 
 humbly apprehend," says Archibald Hall, 
 " that the act of hdieving is the same. 
 
 n 
 
 tt 
 
APPROPRIATING FAITH. 
 
 123 
 
 ; John 
 xxviii, 
 these 
 iployed 
 )\v ex- 
 l be, if, 
 d more 
 le most 
 ost im- 
 vithout 
 totally 
 16(1 ac- 
 tructecl 
 i guess, 
 I could 
 erstood 
 t upon 
 T prizes 
 utterly 
 rational 
 1 words 
 I." " I 
 Id Hall, 
 } same. 
 
 " whether Christ, or the creation of the 
 " world, or the birth of Isaac, or the de- 
 " parture of Israel out of Egypt, or the 
 " falling down of the walls of Jeiicho, be 
 
 *' the thing believed. 
 
 »» 1 
 
 APPROPRIATING FAITH. 
 
 Some of our older theologians — inclu- 
 sive of many of " the Marrow-men " — 
 
 spoke much of the appropriating act of 
 faith. It was this act which they sup- 
 posed to be saving. " In the direct act 
 " of saving faith," says Anderson, " a 
 " person appropriates Christ crucified to 
 " himself, saying with the heart, / am 
 " verily persuaded that Christ is mine" 
 This idea was partly right and partly 
 
 wrong. 
 
 ^ Treatise on the Faith and Influence of the Gospelt 
 Part I, Chap, ii, § 1. 
 
 ^Scripture Doctrine of the Appropriation which 
 is in the Nature of Saving Faith, p. 76. 
 
124 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 I 
 
 ■' i I '■ 
 
 i I 
 
 
 It was right in so far as it assumed 
 that it is indispensable on the part of the 
 sinner that he should realize Ms ovm 
 * proper ' interest in the grace of God and 
 the work of Christ. We think rightly, 
 when we think that it is not enough for 
 the sinner's peace that he believes that 
 God is gracious. He must believe that 
 God is gracious ' to him J It is not enough 
 that he believes that Christ made atone- 
 ment for sins. He must believe that 
 Christ made atonement for * his sins! He 
 must find the word me in the bosom of 
 the word world. The language of his 
 faith must be, — God so loved * me' that he 
 gave his only begotten Son that '/,' believing 
 in him, should not perish but have everlast- 
 ing life. — The Son of God loved * me ' and 
 gave himself for ' me.* The believer thus 
 realizes his property, or, as it was often 
 called, his " right of propriety** in the 
 grace of the Great Father, and the aton- 
 ing work of the Great Saviour. He 
 appropriates to himself what God is, and 
 
APPROPRIATING FAITH. 
 
 125 
 
 isumecl 
 of the 
 IS oum 
 ocl and 
 iglitly, 
 igli for 
 !S that 
 e that 
 jnough 
 atone- 
 i that 
 I.' He 
 som of 
 of his 
 that he 
 dieving 
 verlast- 
 le ' and 
 er thus 
 s often 
 in the 
 3 aton- 
 . He 
 is, and 
 
 did, and does, in so far as he is exhibited 
 in the Gospel, — in so far as he is the 
 Father of mercies. He appropriates to 
 himself what Christ did, and does, and is, 
 in so far as he too is exhibited in the 
 Gospel, — in so far as he is a merciful 
 High Priest and Saviour. It is at once 
 the privilege and the duty of the sinner 
 to "ply diligently," as Luther used to 
 express it, " the first personal pronoun," 
 and say me, me. All this is right. It is 
 of great practical moment. It is indis- 
 pensable in order to personal peace, and 
 personal joy, and personal hope of glory, 
 and the personal experience of the con- 
 straining power of the love of God and of 
 Christ, — the constraining power which 
 sweetly urges and impels the believer to 
 a life of reciprocative love and holy 
 devotedness. 
 
 "What avails to believe that God is 
 " a Father," asks John Eogers reasonably, 
 " if I believe him not to he mine ?" What 
 avails to believe " that Christ is a perfect 
 
 ; \ 
 
I 
 
 126 
 
 <( 
 
 SAVING FAITH." 
 
 » 
 
 \ 
 
 
 " Saviour, who died for man's sins, and 
 ** rose again for his righteousness, except 
 "I believe that he did these for meV 
 What avails to believe in " the forgive- 
 #* ness of sins, and the resurrection to 
 "- eternal life, exee'pt I believe they belong 
 " to me ? '* (Doctrine of Faith, p. 2 7, ed. 
 1632.) 
 
 But the idea of appropriation, as advo- 
 cated by the theologians named, and 
 many others, was partly wrong as well 
 as partly right. They combined with it 
 the doctrine that the grace of God was 
 restricted in its outflow, and that the 
 atonement of Christ was confined in its 
 compass, to a few of mankind — the un- 
 conditionally elected. They did not be- 
 lieve " that God so loved the (whole great) 
 " world," that he sent his only begotten 
 Son to be " a propitiation for the sins of 
 " the whole world." (John iii, 1 6 ; 1 John 
 ii, 2.) They did not believe that Christ 
 " gave himself a ransom for all," and that 
 "he tasted death" literally "for every 
 
 I 
 
ins, and 
 3, except 
 ')r me ? " 
 
 forgive- 
 ction to 
 y helong 
 
 27, ed. 
 
 as advo- 
 ed, and 
 
 as well 
 
 with it 
 jrod was 
 that the 
 3d in its 
 -the un- 
 
 not be- 
 ile great) 
 begotten 
 e sins of 
 
 1 John 
 it Christ 
 and that 
 or every 
 
 APPROPRIATING FAITH. 
 
 m 
 
 ^^manr (1 Tiin. ii, 6 ; Heb. ii, 9.) They 
 thought only of God's love to the wlwle 
 elect world, and of Christ's ransom for 
 ronie of nil classes of men, and of his 
 death for every one of the many sons ivJiom 
 he hrinys to glory. They believed that 
 outside the number of these favoured 
 ones there is an immense world of the 
 unconditionally reprobated, whom God 
 never loved, and for whom Christ never 
 tasted death or gave himself a ransom. 
 They conceived that if Christ had shed 
 his blood for any who are finally lost, it 
 would have been a waste of suffering. 
 The idea that our Saviour's death should 
 be " in vain " in relation to any, appeared 
 to them a glaring incongTuity. They 
 could not reconcile themselves to the 
 notion that One, who saw the end from 
 the beginning, would buy with his blood 
 the souls of those who would " bring upon 
 " themselves swift destruction." Hence 
 they required to devise a theory of faith 
 which would supplement what was de- 
 
 Hi- 
 
 ill 
 
 :^i 
 
 If 
 
128 
 
 ** SAVING faith:' 
 
 i 
 
 1 i 
 
 ! 
 
 ficieiit in their theory of the atonement. 
 In their doctrine of the atonement, and 
 of the grace of the Great Father, there 
 was nothing that enabled them to say to 
 sinners, without distinction or exception, 
 God loves 'you* Christ died for ' yoit! 
 And yet, as they saw clearly that the 
 sinner's conscience would not be satisfied, 
 nor his heart pacified, until he could say, 
 God loves ' mCy Christ died for * me, they 
 invented a doctrine of faith which enabled 
 the sinner to bring out of the Gospel what 
 the Holy Spirit, according to their theory, 
 had never put into it. It was an un- 
 warrantable doctrine. The appropriation 
 of antecedent non-existencies is an im- 
 possibility. The imagination of such an 
 fippropriation is a delusion. Faith cannot 
 make a fact of its own object. The notion 
 of Marshall, the author of 21ie Gospel 
 Mystery of Sanctiflcation, that the object 
 of saving faith " hecometh a certain truth 
 " when we believe it" (p. 142, ed. 1836), 
 is a manifest inversion of thought. To 
 
THE LIFE OF FAITH. 
 
 120 
 
 have faitli is one tlnn<,' ; to have a fancy is 
 another. But happily, it was no fancy 
 that God loves all, and that Christ died 
 for all. It was only the limitarian creed 
 of the theologians referred to which was 
 at fault. It was it which was the fancv. 
 The Holy Spirit has, as a matter of fact, 
 put into the Gospel all that the worthy 
 preachers sought, by means of appropriaf- 
 iTig faithj to bring out of it. It is ac- 
 tually the case that the grace of God is 
 to all, and that the atonement of Christ 
 was for all ; and hence, when any appro- 
 priated to themselves their full share of 
 the universal grace and universal atone- 
 ment, they only took, though they knew 
 it not, what had been provided for their 
 use. 
 
 
 M 
 
 I: 
 
 J* 
 
 'I 
 
 \\ 
 
 ■ * 
 
 
 THE LIFE OF FAITH, 
 
 " The life which I now live in the 
 " flesh," says the Apostle Paul, " I live 
 " by the faith of the Son of God, who 
 
 f2 
 
 II 
 
 ■■» 9 
 
 ' i 
 
lao 
 
 l< C» 
 
 SAVING FAITH.'* 
 
 *' loved me, and jL^ave hiinselt' for lue." 
 (dal. ii, 20.) The Apostle, when pennin^jj 
 these words, realized that he was still 
 " in the flesh." He had not yet risen u]) 
 into the more ethereal regions of the life 
 that is everlasting. He was " here," 
 down here, " in the hody pent," cooped 
 np in his little earthly and earthy taber- 
 nacle-house. (2 Cor. V, 1.) Hence he 
 was not yet, in the highest sense of the 
 <3xpression, " present with the Lord," the 
 Lord Jesus. (2 Cor. v, G-8.) He was 
 not present " face to face." He did not 
 really " see " the Lord. He could only 
 see his reflection, as in a mirror. And 
 as the mirror which he possessed was far 
 from being unclouded, he could only "see 
 ^' darkly." He hoped for more than he 
 possessed. He " walked by faith, not by 
 " sight." (2 Cor. v, 7.) He " lived by 
 '" the faith of the Son of God, who loved 
 *' him, and gave himself for him." 
 
 The expression " the faith of the Son 
 "* of God " has by some been supposed to 
 
 
THE LIFE OF FAITH. 
 
 LSI 
 
 lilO." 
 
 still 
 
 jj 
 
 mean " the faith which was Huhjedurif/ 
 " character ifitic of the Sov of God " while 
 he was down here on the earth. It is 
 far more likely, however, that the phrase 
 is to be understood ohjectiveJy, as denot- 
 ing " the faith which terminateel on the 
 " Son of God." There need be no 
 difficulty with the genitive expression 
 " of the Son of God." The phrase " the 
 " love of God " may either mean, subjec- 
 tively, the love ivhich emanates from 
 God, or, objectively, the love ivhich 
 terminates on God. And so the phrase 
 " the faith of the Son of God," may, as 
 a phrase, mean either " the faith of 
 " which Christ is the subject," or " the 
 " faith of which Christ is the object." 
 The preceding and succeeding context 
 of the phrase seems to make it evi- 
 dent that the Apostle is thinking 
 not so much of Christ our Exemplar 
 as of Christ our Substitute and Sa- 
 viour. 
 
 We live in the flesh by the faith of 
 
 
132 
 
 '* SAVING FAITH.'* 
 
 the ^on of God, when we draw the in- 
 spiration of our terrestrial life from what 
 our faith realizes in the Son of God. 
 We live hy the faith of the Smi of God, 
 when " the love of Christ " consciously 
 " constrains us/' — constrains us " to live 
 " not unto ourselves, but unto him who 
 " died for us, and rose again." (2 Cor. 
 V, 14, 15.) We live hy the faith of the 
 Son of God, when we live as Moses lived, 
 " as seeing him who is mvisible." (Heb. 
 xi, 27.) Faith is in the place of sight. 
 Jt is a kind of sight. We speak natur- 
 ally and finely of " the eye of faith." By 
 means of it, the veil which conceals the 
 spiritual side of the universe is partially 
 penetratec^, so that the purest and loftiest 
 of the motives, that can play on the 
 springs of human action, get access to 
 the soul. The life on earth, which is the 
 product of these motives, is the most 
 beautiful kind of life, the most useful, 
 the most Christ-like, the most satisfying, 
 the most holy. 
 
. THE EFFECTS OF FAITH, 
 
 There are many consequences of the 
 greatest moment conditioned on faith. 
 There are consequences that are realized 
 beyond and above the sphere of the human 
 consciousness ; and there are conse- 
 quences that are realized in the conscious 
 experience of believers. 
 
 When man acts, God acts. Some of 
 the old theoretical thinkers found a 
 speculative difficulty in receiving such 
 an idea. It seemed to them to be incon- 
 sistent with the absolute supremacy and 
 independence of God. They had no diffi- 
 culty in seeing that human action was 
 conditioned on divine action. But they 
 were unable to understand the law of 
 reciprocal action, or of action and re- 
 action, in the inter-relationship of the 
 creature and the Creator. 
 
 There is no real difficulty, however. 
 It would be almost an infinite imperfec- 
 tion in God, were he not, in his own 
 
 
 f 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 % ■ 
 
 1 1 
 
 I 
 
 
 n] 
 
' i 
 
 134 
 
 i( V 
 
 SAVING faith:' 
 
 conscious subjectivity, to feel and act 
 according to the reality of everythirig 
 that is, and of everything that becomes. 
 Were he merely to see everything that is 
 beyond the spht^re of his own self- 
 consciousness, and within the spheres of 
 the self-consciousness of other agents, 
 and to pass no judgement, and to experience 
 no feeling, in reference to what he sees, 
 would not his eye be unaccountably dis- 
 proportioned to his Judgement and his 
 Heart ? If there be a divine Eye, there 
 must also be a divine iTidgement, and a 
 divine Heart, even as ^]t 'le must also be 
 a divine Hand. And it will be no more 
 inconsistent with infinite supremacy and 
 independency, for the Judgement to judge, 
 and the Heart to feel, than for the Eye to 
 see, and the Hand to work. 
 
 When a man, then, acts in faith, God 
 acts too, and acts on the highest principle 
 of correspondency or harmony. He botli 
 feels and acts. He approves in his heart 
 of the act of faith. He smiles down- 
 
THE EFFECTS OF FAITH. 
 
 135 
 
 I act 
 
 jomes. 
 hat is 
 self- 
 res of 
 Lgents, 
 erieowe 
 e sirs, 
 [j dis- 
 id his 
 , there 
 and a 
 tlso be 
 ) more 
 y and 
 judge, 
 Eye to 
 
 h, God 
 inciple 
 e both 
 s heart 
 down- 
 
 ward. He beholds the believer " with 
 ** a pleasant countenance." He judges 
 justifyingly. Pie justifies. And thus 
 the believer is ** justified by faith." (Acts 
 xiii, o9 ; Eom. iii, 26 ; v, 1 ; Gal. ii, 16.) 
 He is not only forgiveii (Acts xiii, 38 ; 
 E[)h. i, 7) ; he is recognized as having in 
 the hand of his faith the true title-deed 
 to the inheritance that is full of glory. 
 He is judged to be in possession of the 
 righteousness that entitles to eV'erlastinL>' 
 life. It is " the righteousness of God," 
 — the righteousness provided by God, 
 the rija:hteousness which was wrou<jht 
 out by " Jesus Christ the righteous." 
 The believer is thus enrolled as " an 
 " heir of God," and " a joint- heir with 
 " Christ." 
 
 All this takes place above and beyond 
 the consciousness of the believer. It 
 takes place in the consciousness of God. 
 It is the action of God within the sphere 
 of his own self-consciousness. 
 
 But there are other and correspondent 
 
 
 fi 
 
I 
 
 f 
 
 ■l i 
 
 l:^C 
 
 ''SAVING faith:' 
 
 consequences within the sphere of the hu- 
 man consciousness, — consequences which 
 are the counterparts of the divine thoughts 
 and feelings. The judgement of God re- 
 flects itself, as iar as the intermediacies 
 that bridge divine and human thought 
 will permit, into the mind of the believer. 
 The believer gets to know about the 
 favourable feelings of God. They have 
 been telegraphed. They have been testi- 
 fied. They are involved within the pro- 
 mise which is enfolded within the glori- 
 ous object of faith, — the atonement. 
 They lie there, ready to be evolved into 
 the consciousness of the believer. And 
 hence the believer, as soon as he believes 
 in the Great Object revealed in the good 
 news, experiences ^eace with God. (Eom. 
 V, 1.) It is something like the 'peace of 
 Christ himself. (John xiv, 27.) It is 
 " peace that passeth all understanding." 
 (Phil, iv, 7.) 
 
 He also experiences joy unspeakable 
 and full of glory. (1 Pet. i, 8.) It is 
 

 THE EFFECTS OF FAITH, 
 
 137 
 
 "joy in the Holy Ghost/' (1 Thes. i, 6.) 
 It is "joy in God." (Eom. v, 11.) It is 
 the most joyful of joys. 
 
 He has also experience of peculiarly 
 lively hopCy (1 Pet. i, 3) ; — of hope the 
 most enlivening and animating. It is 
 the hope of the glory — the heavenly glory 
 — of God. (Eom. v, 2.) 
 
 And, hest of all, he has experience of 
 holiness. God " purifies his heart through 
 " faith," so that he longs to become per- 
 fectly good, and does become good. He 
 heartily loves goodness. He loves God. 
 He loves man. He loves both God and 
 man unselfishly. He loves God su- 
 premely, — " with his heart and soul and 
 " strength and mind," — with *' all his 
 " heart, and all his soul, and all his 
 " strength, and all his mind." Such at 
 least is the constant aim with which he 
 wings his flight in love. He loves his 
 neighbour too as he loves himself, — sovu- 
 what as. And more, and more, and still 
 more, does he aim thus to love his neigh- 
 
 f I 
 
• i 
 
 1 
 
 il 
 
 138 
 
 *' SAVING FAITH." 
 
 bour, until he loves him with a love that 
 is entirely like the love which he bears to 
 himself, — a love that is " like " to the 
 love wLich he bears to God (see Matt, 
 xxii, 39), and that is in miniature, like 
 the love which God bears to him. (1 
 John iv, 11.) It is his continual aim, as 
 he moves along through the world, to 
 make himself, in meekness and in modesty, 
 a Living Blessing to his fellow-men. 
 Such love is at once " the fulfilling of the 
 " law " (Eom. xiii, 10), and the fulfilling 
 of the Gospel. When it is " full to the 
 " brim," it is goodness in the superlative 
 degree. It is godliness. It is godlike- 
 ness. 
 
 Thus is the believer sanctified, as well 
 as justified, — and all " through faith," 
 through faith in Jesus, who is " made of 
 " God unto him sanctification." (1 Cor. 
 i, 30.) He seeks to " purify himself even 
 *' as Jesus is pure." (1 John iii, 3.) He 
 is a new creature, in respect of character. 
 (2 Cor. V, 17.) He is divinely recon- 
 
)) 
 
 A POSSIBILITY TO HEATHENS? 13^^ 
 
 structed in the tissue of his life. " Old 
 " things are passed away ; behold, all 
 " things are become new." (2 Cor. v, 
 17.) He is a new man in his mode of 
 living, and in the motives of his life. 
 He sees differently. He feels differently. 
 He acts differently. And observing men 
 "take knowledge of him, that he has 
 " been with Jesus." (Acts iv, 13.) He 
 has power to resist the temptations that 
 continually assail him. He " can do all 
 *' things through Christ who strengtheneth 
 " him." (Phil, iv, 13.) He is panoplied 
 in " the armour of God." (Eph. vi, 13.) 
 And all along his way, to its end, and at 
 its end, " this is the victory that over- 
 "cometh the world, EVEN HIS faith." 
 (1 John V, 4.) 
 
 i 
 
 "I 
 
 IS SAVING FAITH 
 A POSSIBILITY TO HEATHENS? 
 
 We should feel sad indeed, were we 
 
 I 
 
140 
 
 ** SAVING FAITH." 
 
 constrained to think that any individual 
 of the human race is absolutely shut out 
 from the possibility of salvation. " God 
 " is good unto all. His tender mercies 
 " are over all his works. He has not 
 " left himself luithout witness in any 
 " nation. The Gentiles^ which have not 
 " the law, are a law unto themselves. 
 " They shew the ivor'k of the law written 
 ** in their hearts." (Ps. cxlv, 9 ; Acts xiv, 
 17 ; Rom. ii, 14, 15.) There is a Revela- 
 tion of God to all men, — a Revelation 
 not only of what he is in his relation to 
 men as men, but also of what he is in his 
 relation to men as sinners. God is not 
 dealing with any members of the human 
 race simply as they deserve. He is deal- 
 ing graciously. In wrath deserved he is 
 remembering mercy. 
 
 But if it be true that salvation is a 
 possibility to all men, it must also be 
 true that the mental state, which is on 
 man's part the means of attaining salva- 
 tion, will be a possibility. Faith will be 
 
A POSSIBILITY TO HEATHENS? 141 
 
 a possibility, — for " without faith it is 
 " impossible to please God." 
 
 The great Object of faith cannot 
 indeed be known by heathens under 
 all the phases and phrases which are 
 familiar to students of the written Word. 
 But such knowledge, however desirable 
 and precious, and indeed inestimable, is 
 not absolutely indispensable. It w^as 
 unattainable even by prophets, priests, 
 and kings, in Old Testament times. 
 Abraham " saw afar off." It was a fact 
 that he " saw " : yet many things which 
 are sufficiently familiar to the simplest- 
 minded of modern believers, and even to 
 the little children of our Christian house- 
 holds, would be quite beyond the round 
 of the great patriarch's horizon. Other 
 things would be but dimly apprehended 
 by him as specks in the great distance. 
 He could not know the incidents of the 
 life and death of our Lord. They could 
 be only partially anticipated, even by 
 those who were furnished with the most 
 
142 
 
 "SAVING FAITH.'' 
 
 powerful telescopes of prevision or pro- 
 pi lecy. Yet he knew what was suffi- 
 cient for salvation. And we may easily 
 conceive that an area of knowledge, still 
 more and much more circumscribed than 
 that of Abraham, may suffice. If there 
 be such an amount of knowledge as to 
 quicken into activity penitence for sin, 
 find trust in the propitiousness of God, 
 and love for true goodness, may we not 
 hope that it will suffice ? A minutely 
 elaborated theology, a voluminously de- 
 fined " Confession of Faith," cannot be 
 absolutely essential. And the infinitely 
 microscopic as well as telescopic eye of 
 God will be quick to detect the very 
 primal germs of genuine faith. 
 
 We may confidently leave the poor 
 heathen abroad, and the poorer heathen 
 at home, in His hands. We have made 
 reference to the possibilities of their con- 
 dition, not so much to satisfy the inqui- 
 sitiveness that is natural to sympathy, as 
 to bring into view the incomplexity of 
 
FAITH AND FAITHFULNESS. 
 
 143 
 
 that spiritual and evangelical truth that 
 is indispensable to salvation. 
 
 THE CONNECTION BETWEEN 
 FAITH AND FAITHFULNESS, 
 
 It is noteworthy that there is an 
 intimate connection between the words 
 faith and faithfulness. The word faith, 
 as is obvious at once to the ear and to 
 the eye, is part and parcel of the word 
 /(XtY/ifulness. Faith is in faithfulness, be- 
 cause faithfulness is supposed to be the 
 quality of a person's character who is 
 faithful, that i^ faith-full or full of faith. 
 It is assumed in the connection of the 
 words, and it was assumed at the time 
 when the connection of the words was 
 established, that when a man was theo- 
 logically full of faith, he was, on that 
 account, morally faithful or characterized 
 hj faithfulness. It was assumed, in other 
 words, that when a man had faith and 
 
 !! 
 
 11 
 
144 
 
 *' SAVING FAITH/ 
 
 ii 
 
 i 
 
 f 
 
 ; 
 
 was full of faith, he would be a man who 
 could be depended on, — a man who might 
 be trusted in all circumstances, and with 
 whatsoever might be committed to his 
 charge. This relationship of faith to 
 faithfulness is a ^st interesting connec- 
 tion. It is a relationship which still 
 continues, and will continue while the 
 world lasts — and a great deal longer. In 
 whomsoever there is genuine faith in 
 relation to the Gospel and the God of the 
 Gospel, there will be true faithfulness. 
 And in whomsoever, on the other hand, 
 there is true faithfulness in relation to 
 God and the Gospel, there will, sooner or 
 later, be genuine faith, at least in germ. 
 Faithfulness and faith, when we go to 
 the ultimates of things, imply one another. 
 
 It is interesting to note, in connection 
 
 with the relationship between faith and 
 
 faithfulness, two expressions, contrary to 
 
 one another, which are still in common 
 
 use in our e very-day language, good faith 
 
FAITH AND FAITHFULNESS. 
 
 145 
 
 and had faith. We speak of a man acting 
 in [food faith, or in had faith. A man 
 who acts in had faith acts dishonestly. 
 He deceives you. He cheats, or tries to 
 cheat you. A man, aj]fain, who acts in 
 good faith, is a man who acts conscien- 
 tiously, uprightly, honourably, faithfully. 
 The expressions have an instructive his- 
 tory. They belong to tliat peculiar 
 phraseological group to which the word 
 miscreant belongs. This word miscreant 
 is a Norman or French word, meaning 
 mis-heliever, and its present meaning of 
 scoundrel points back to a time when it 
 was assumed, on the one hand, that no 
 true believer could be a scoundrel, and, 
 on the other, that if a man was not a 
 believer in God, as the God of the Gospel, 
 there was no security that he would not 
 turn out to be a scoundrel. It is thus 
 assumed that if faith in God were lost in 
 society, men would speedily degenerate 
 into a mob of scoundrels. And just as 
 faith is thus of immense moral moment, so 
 
11) 
 
 146 
 
 'savijvg faith:' 
 
 is it of the greatest consequence that this 
 faith be fixed on the true God and the 
 true Gospel. Faith in a false God would 
 be had faith, and would ultimately exert 
 such a moral influence, that the man 
 would be apt to become, morally, a man 
 of had faith — a man not to be trusted — 
 a man who would not care to keep his 
 word to you if he could break it to his 
 own secular advantage. A man's worship 
 determines in the end his worthship. A 
 man of good faith is a man who is sup- 
 posed to have right faith — faith, that is 
 to say, in a right object — faith in the 
 true God and in the true Gospel. It is 
 expected that such a man will be trust- 
 worthy to the core. If he be not, his 
 faith is really bad, whatever his profes- 
 sion may be. It is either hypocritical, 
 or based on a mis-apprehension of the 
 grand realities of Revelation. "The 
 " word faith" as Dr. Samuel Clarke re- 
 marks, " always contains in it the notion 
 " of faithfvlnfi^s or jidvUiifr (Sirnums, 
 xxvi.) 
 
fi THE WORD FAITH , 
 
 r.. IN THE OLD TESTAMENT, , ; 
 
 The word faith does not occur fre- 
 quently in the Old Testament. The 
 thing represented by the word would 
 no doubt be a common enough experi- 
 ence m those ancient times. There were 
 many Old Testament worthies, — of whom 
 the world was not worthy, — whose 
 prominent characteristic sprang from 
 faith. They lived and died in faith. In 
 the eleventh chapter of the Epistle to the 
 Hebrews we have an illuminated roll of 
 some of these Old Testament believers. 
 Enoch was one. Abraham was one. 
 Moses was one. And yet in the Old 
 Testament Scriptures themselves, the 
 word faith occurs only twice ; and in one 
 of the passages where it occurs, it means 
 what we call faithfuhuss, rather than 
 what is called, in the New Testament, 
 faith. 
 
 The two passages are Deuteronomy 
 
 . -. , • .,,,,. . ^ Cf ■. ■ . , • . . , . , . 
 
 \Jt ml 
 
 i ! 
 
 ( 
 
 I' 
 
 ! 
 
148 
 
 SAVING faith:' 
 
 xxxii, 20, and Habakkuk ii, 4. In Deiit- 
 eronom/ xxxii, 20, the people of Israel 
 are spoken of as " a very froward genera- 
 " tion, children in whom is no faith" that 
 is, " children in whom is v^o faithfulness.'' 
 In the other passage, Habakkuk ii, 4, we 
 read, " the just shall live by faith" that 
 is, " the just by faith — the righteous by 
 faith — he who has righteousness by faith 
 — shall live." He shall have true life. 
 Here the word has, we should suppose, 
 its common New Testament acceptation. 
 Indeed, the wonderful apophthegm of 
 the prophet, in which it occurs, is the 
 fountain or well-spring of the most 
 peculiar and glorious element in the 
 teaching of the Apostle Paul. (Rom. i, 
 16, 17.) 
 
 THE WORD FAITH 
 IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. 
 
 In the New Testament the word faith 
 occurs frequently ; but not always with 
 
FAITH'' IN NEW TESTAMENT. 141) 
 
 the same signification. It has two signi- 
 fications, — the same two which it has in 
 its Old Testament usage. In some few 
 cases, it means fccithfulrtess. For instance, 
 we read in Komans iii, 3 — " For what if 
 " some did not believe ? Shall their un- 
 " belief make the faith of God of none 
 " effect ?" Faith is here ascribed to God. 
 But it is impossible for us to suppose that 
 God is capable of exercising that hind of 
 faith which distinguished the Old Testa- 
 ment believers, and which luis rendered 
 illustrious so many of their New Testa- 
 ment . successors. God cannot be a 
 believer, in the ordinary acceptation of the 
 word. Belief is too imperfect an act or 
 state, having to do with its object medi- 
 ately rather than iynnudiatelyy to be rever- 
 ently ascribed to God. God's faith there- 
 fore is his faithfuhvess. There are some 
 few other passages, in which the term 
 seems to have this same signification ; and 
 indeed it is rendered fidelity y that is, 
 fa'ithfulnesiSy in Titus i1, 10, where servants 
 
 ■J , 
 
150 
 
 ''SAVjNff faith:' 
 
 are exhorted not to purloin, " shewing all 
 " good fidelity" or faithfuhuss, or faith. 
 The word is here TQ\\([eYQ(\. faithfidness in 
 Tyndale's version, and Coverdale's, and 
 the Geneva. It is rendered faith in 
 AYyeliffe's version and the Rheims. 
 
 THE END. 
 
 : 
 
 tiLASOOW : PKINTEP AT THE UNIVRRSITY PRRSg, 
 BY ROBERT MACLEHOSE, 
 
I I 
 
 ,^^<vA i 
 
 •I! ■■■• 
 
 Hi ^ ■^''' 
 
 New Books 
 
 AND 
 
 New Editions. 
 
 »;•: -JTi 
 
. J *' - » ' i. '- ■' 
 
 ;uA*u>' 
 
 
New Books and New Editions. 
 
 THE RELIGIOUS ANECDOTES OF SCOTLAND. 
 
 Edited by William Adamson, D.D. Price 5s. 
 
 BIBLICAL HELP TOW i JDS HOLINESS IN 
 LIVING AND HAPPINESS IN DYING. By James Morison, 
 D.D. Price 2s 6d. 
 
 THE EXTENT OF THE ATONEMENT. By 
 
 James Morisou, D.D. Price 28 6d. 
 
 A CRITICAL EXPOSITION OF THE THIRD 
 CHAPTER OF PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. By James 
 Morison, D.D. Price 128 6d. 
 
 A COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF RUTH. 
 
 By James Morison, D.D. Price Ss. 
 
 SA VING FAITH: or the Faith by which the Sinner 
 is consciously United to the Saviour Practically Considered. 
 By James Morison, D.D. Price Is. 6d. 
 
 AN EVANGELICAL CATECHISM, tor the Use of 
 
 Sunday Schools and Parents. By James Morison, D. D. Price 2d. 
 
 THE BARDS OF THE BIBLE. By the Rev. 
 
 George Gilfillan. Price 8s 6d. 
 
 DAVID: KING OF ISRAEL. His Life and its 
 Lessons. By William M. Taylor, D.D. Price 2s 6d. 
 
 THE GOSPEL MIRACLES IN THEIR RELA- 
 TION TO CHRIST AND CHRISTIANITY. By William M. 
 Taylor, D.D. Price 2». 
 
«> 
 
 NEW BOOKS AND NEW EDITIONS. 
 
 PEACE WITH GOD. A Treatise Designed Princi- 
 pally for Inquirers. By Fergus Ferguson, D.D. Price Is 6d. 
 
 HOLINESS : or What We Should Be and What We 
 Should Do. By Fergus Fergiison, D.D. Price Is Cd. 
 
 THE SICK CHAMBER. A Book for the Sick and 
 SiilTering. By Fergus Ferguson, D.D. Price 28 Od. 
 
 PASSING EVENTS IMPROVED. By Fergus 
 Ferguson, D.D. Price 2s Cd. • ,. 
 
 SACRED SCENES: Notes of Travel in Egypt and 
 the Holy Land. By Fergus Ferguson, D.D. Price 5s. 
 
 THINGS NEW AND OLD. A Volume of Dis- 
 courses. By Fergus Ferguson, D.D. Price 2s 6d. 
 
 THE PARABLE OF THE PRODIGAL SON. A 
 Homiletic Exposition. By Fergus Ferguson, D.D. Price 
 2s 6d. 
 
 A HISTORY OF THE EVANGELICAL UNION 
 OF SCOTLAND. By Fergus Ferguson, D.D. Price Cs 6d. 
 
 A POPULAR LIFE OF CHRIST. By Fergus 
 Ferguson, D.D. Price 10s 6d. * 
 
 THE PA TRIARCHS : Their Lives and Lessons. By 
 Fergus Ferguson, D.D. Price 7s 6d. 
 
 THE BOOK OF FAMILY AND PRIVATE 
 
 DEVOTION. Being Morning and Evening Prayers for Three 
 Months. By Twenty-three Clergymen. Edited by Fergus 
 Ferguson, D.D. Price Cs 6d. 
 
 NOT FOUND WANTING. A Temperance Tale. 
 By^Fergus Ferguson, D.D. Price Is fid. 
 
NEW BOOKS AND NEW EDITIONS. 
 
 3 
 
 THE PHYSICAL CAUSE OF THE DEATH OF 
 CHRIST. By William Stroud, M.D. Price 38 Gd. 
 
 THE PR A YER MEETING AND ITS IMPRO VE- 
 MENT. By the Rev. Lewis O. Thompson. Price 4s 6d. 
 
 riX; \ 
 
 Evangelical Doctrinal Series, 
 
 I.—REOENERA TION. Its Condition and Methods. 
 By the Rev. Robert Craig, M.A. 
 
 II.— THE FATHERHOOD OF GOD. By the Rev. 
 
 Robert Mitchell. 
 
 III.— THE HOLY SPIRITS WORK: Its Nature 
 and Extent. By the Rev. George Cron. 
 
 IV.— THE NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 
 By William Adamson, D.D. 
 
 v.— THE DOCTRINES OF PREDESTINATION, 
 
 REPROBATION, AND ELECTION. By the Rev. Robert 
 Wallace. 
 
 VI.— THE DOCTRINE OF SIN. By the Rev. 
 Alexander Brown. 
 
 VII.— THE FREEDOM OF THE WILL. By the 
 Rev. Professor Taylor. 
 
 VIIL—THE CHARACTER OF GOD, By Fergus 
 Ferguson, D.D. 
 
 IX,— THE EXTENT OF THE A TON EM EN T. By 
 
 James Morison, D.D. 
 
 Friot 2« M piv Voluriu, or CotapUte Htl, lt>.s. 
 
4 NEW BOOKS AND NEW EDITIONS. 
 
 THE DESTINY OF THE WICKED. By the Bev. 
 A. M. Wilson. Price 28. 
 
 THE WORTHIES OF THE EVANGELICAL 
 
 UNION. Their Lives and Labours. By various writers. 
 Price 8s 6d. 
 
 THE WINES OF THE BIBLE. By the Rev. A. 
 
 M. Wilson. Price 6s. 
 
 JESUS IN THE MIDST, By the Rev. George 
 
 Cron. Price 2s 6d. 
 
 THE RIGHTEO USNESS OF 00 D : Viewed in Its 
 Various Aspects. By William Adamson, D.D. Price 28. 
 
 A PRACTICAL BIBLE TEMPERANCE COM- 
 MENTARY. By the Rev. Alexander Stewart, M.D. Price 
 38 6d. 
 
 THE PjEDOBAPTISTS GUIDE: On Mode and 
 Subject and Baptismal Regeneration. By John Guthrie, D.D. 
 Price 28. 
 
 CHRIST A \D MAN: or, God's Answer to Our Chief 
 Questions. By William Bathgate, D.D. Price 6s. 
 
 THE DEEP THINGS OF GOD. By William 
 Bathgate, D.D. Price 58. 
 
 Glasgow: Thomas D. Morison. 
 
 London : Hamilton, Apams ^ Co. 
 
Rev. 
 
 VAL 
 
 riters. 
 
 r. A. 
 
 eorge 
 
 D Its 
 
 'OM- 
 Price 
 
 I and 
 , D.D. 
 
 :hief 
 
 iliam 
 
 ^