.0^\^ 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-S) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 112 2 2 
 
 2.0 
 
 >: «. 
 
 1.8 
 
 
 1.25 1.4 
 
 1'^ 
 
 
 6" — 
 
 
 ► 
 
 V} 
 
 <9 
 
 /}. 
 
 .%' >/ 
 
 <p; 
 
 w 
 
 /,. 
 
 '/ 
 
 /A 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 

 CmM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions 
 
 Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 1980 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiquea 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a M possible de se procurer. Les dtktails 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite. ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mAtnode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquAs ci-dessoMS. 
 
 Th« 
 to 1 
 
 Th« 
 poi 
 of 
 filn 
 
 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 r~n Covers damaged/ 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Couverture endommag^e 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie et/ou pellicul6e 
 
 □ Cover title missing/ 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 r~~| Coloured maps/ 
 
 D 
 
 Cartes g^ographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured init (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bieue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serrde peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intdrieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans ie texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela dtait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas iti filmies. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppldmantaires; 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 □ Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagies 
 
 □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restauries et/ou pellicul6es 
 
 □ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages dicolor^es, tacheties ou piquiies 
 
 n Pages detached/ 
 Pages d6tach6es 
 
 □ Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 □ Quality of print varies/ 
 Quality indgale de I'impression 
 
 □ Includes supplementary material/ 
 Coinprend du materiel supptimentaire 
 
 □ Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponibie 
 
 D 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6X6 filmdes A nouveau de fa^on d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 Ori 
 be] 
 the 
 sio 
 oth 
 firfl 
 sio 
 or 
 
 Th( 
 shi 
 
 Tir 
 
 wh 
 
 Ma 
 difl 
 eni 
 be] 
 rigl 
 req 
 me 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est IWmi au taux de reduction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 J 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here hot been reproduced thenke 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 Library of the Public 
 Archives of Canada 
 
 L'exemplaire filmi fut reproduit grAce A la 
 ginArositA de: 
 
 La bibliothdque des Archives 
 publiques du Canada 
 
 The imeges appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in Iteeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Les images suivantes ont M reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition at 
 de la nettet* de rexemplaire film*, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning ith the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the bacit cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimAe sont filmis en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 derniire page qui comporte una empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont filmis en commen^ant par la 
 premiAre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernlAre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol —^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol Y (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 derniire image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbols -^ signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols y signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., pauvent dtre 
 fiimis A des taux de reduction diffirents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour 6tre 
 reproduit en un seul cliche, il est filmi A partir 
 de I'angle supArieur gauche, de gauche d droite, 
 et de haut en has, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images n6cessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mAthode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
f 
 
 , If 
 
 1> 
 
immm'mimBm 
 
 MEMORANDUM 
 
 IN RELATION TO THE 
 
 SEIZURE OF VESSELS 
 
 BELON(JING TO 
 
 J. &C. NOBLE 
 
 PRKPARED IV rONSKQUENCR 
 
 OF THE 
 
 KKFUSAL OF THE COMMISSIONER TO HEAR ARGUMENT AT 
 THE CLOSE OF THE COMMISSION FOR INVESTIGATION 
 
 OF CHARGES AGAINST THE SAID NOBLES. 
 
 McCarthy, osler, hoskin & ckeelman 
 
 COLLINOWOOD ENTERPRISE PRINT. 
 
 m 
 
mmm^':^,:^^mi 
 
 ■i f 
 
 •".' Vi ' \'^ ' ■ ■ t 
 
 ll 
 
 I'X.-' 
 
 ■ / ». '. 
 
 ■'* V 
 
 .n\ 
 
 ■kL. 
 
 .*>',-»yi.,- 
 
 &ISIi#!l^ 
 
 11 
 
 .'nJaS'-T: 
 
 * '*^' 
 
 ■<:•:-,''?' 
 
 ;■;> 
 
 ^} 
 
 ';ii?:*>.:' 
 
 ■\H5' 
 

 MEMORANDUM 
 
 l\ l{i;i,ATI()\ TfHIIK 
 
 SEIZURE OF VESSELS 
 
 l!KL(>N«ir\(; TO 
 
 J. & C. NOBLE 
 
 im{i:paki;i» in <'o\si;i/i'k\(k 
 
 OF THK 
 
 H KFUS A L O F TH K d >MM ISSIONE R TO U E A U A R( ! I : M F.NT \T 
 THK CLOSE OF THE (M)MMISSIOX FOIl INVESTH^ATIOX 
 
 OF CHAUiiES ACAINSTTHE SAID NOF.LES. 
 
 MrCAUTHY, OSLHH, HOSKIN A- ('UK ELM AN' 
 
 (•OLI.IX(J\V(»OI> KNTKRPRISK J'KINT. 
 
Memorandum 
 
 IN 
 
 KELATIO^' TO THE SEIZURE OF VESSELS BELONOINO TO .1. & 
 
 C. NOBLE. FKEPAKEl) IN CONSEgUEXCE OF THE REFUSAL 
 
 OF THE COMMISSIONER TO HEAR ARCJUMENT AT THE 
 
 CLOeE OF COMMISSION FOR INVESTKJATION OF 
 
 CHARGES AGALNSTTHE SAII> NOBLfiS. 
 
 On the 8th aiid 9th (hiys of May, 1894, four steam tu^s and a 
 number of sail boats which belonj,'e(l or were supposed to Iwlonfj to J. 
 & C. Noble, of Killarney, were seized by Fishery Overseer Elliott a( 
 Squaw Island and Hyn^ Tnlet on the (4e(»r}^ian Bay. This seizure was 
 made under instructions from the Department of Marine and Fisher- 
 ies to the F.().,in answer to a tele<jram from him advisinj? the Depart- 
 ment that the Nobles were then tishinjor without a license. 
 
 Durintj the followinjj month two ch_ar*i[es werejlaid against them for 
 fishinja: vithout a license, and they were brou«j;ht before Police Maj^is- 
 trate Burden cm or about June 24th, 1894, when tme of the charges 
 was withdrawn, and upon the other a fine of $5.00 was imposed. 
 
 The tugs and boats seized, which were of a value of several thous- 
 and dollars were not returned, the said sad boats being sold by private 
 .sale without notice to the Nobles, and the tugs Ijeing advertised for 
 sale by tender, which sale has been postp<med from time to time. 
 
 The Nobles have not only lost the season of 1894 but their busine.ss 
 has l)een ruined, their trade has \yeen turned into the hands of a rival 
 Company and it has become known over the whole territory through 
 which their business extends that fishennen dealing with them cannot 
 -tixpect fair treatment at the hands of the F. O. The Nobles have 
 stated upon oath that the loss inflicted upon them by the action of the 
 F. O. amounts to, no less than $25,000. As soon as it became known 
 that the seizure had been made, the Nobles represented to the Depart- 
 
iiK'iit tliiil tlicy liiil Iti'i'ii trcjitfd iiiKst unjustly and unfairly by tlie V. 
 <)., tliJit \]u'.\ (lid \\i>{ intt'iid lo do unytliin,y: wrnnj;, rliiit ilicy hud sent 
 out tlu'ii" tii;,'s !ind ln>!i(s 1(1 tilt' lisliiii;; j,'f(»unds witfi tlr* t'idl t'Xprct i- 
 tit>n tluit iifcnsj's would he recfivrd in (hie I'oursr, ihal otJKM* fisluMMniMi 
 Imd done the sain.', and tluit llicir huts a;id tU'^-' li i I n-it hnMi st'i/."d, 
 altliow^h it was known tu the !•'. ( ). at the tiin«' ot'tliis si'iznip that the 
 ntlicr tui^rsand loat-i lisliin,' at the s mi'' t.ini!' and jdafi* had not vr- 
 I'civcd liL'i'nsi's : and fiiither that they liad Ii.tii led into a tiva]) hy the 
 antinn of the I*\ <)., who had concealed fmni tlieni the fact that theii' 
 licenses were not likely to he <^niMted. expressly ii order to induce 
 them to send out their tu^s and hoats in ji^ood faith in order that he 
 nii«;ht have an oj»|).»i'tuiuty of sci/ini,' them. These lepresentalioiis 
 havin;^ het?n inaije tithe |)ei>arlnient. the NoUles were met with tiie 
 answer that nuntemus complaints had hccn made a^fainst them to the 
 hepartment in former years, that it was stated and i»elie\ed to he the 
 fact that they luwl heeii convicted of violations of the Fisheries Act 
 ami He_i;ulations, and in short that theii- conduct in other years had 
 heen such as to justify tlmii" heint; treattid as outlaws, and that tliey 
 could expect no l(MUency whatever, even if it was ti'ue that they had 
 in this iiista'nce been harshly ti'eated l»y tin* 1\ (>.. and that lljeir 
 oji'euee was a merely technical one. 
 
 Tile iVohles sti'on,i,dy assrtrt.sd that th) stitrtiUHiits mide t> th' 
 Department a^^ainst them were for the most pai't j^ross slanders,that it 
 was untrue that they had, as cliai'^ed, pei'sistently vitdated the law and 
 hiuJ incited others to do the same, and that if any such charj^es had 
 l)een made, upon a |>uhhc investi;,Mtion they cnild satisfactorily dis 
 prove or explain them. 
 
 So 111) !iy and .so j^i-oss were the charjjes which had been made 
 aj,'ainst the Nobles in letter.s and reports to t!ie Depai-tnient, l>y the F. 
 (>., and perhaps by others instiijated by him and by their rivals in the 
 Hshiiij; busines.s, that the Dej)a»'tment felt justiKed in tnaking })ublic 
 by a letter (►ver the si<>;natun> of .lames ilardt^e, Ks |., AcSinj,' Deputy 
 Ministei- of Marine and Fisheries. ad(h*e.ssetl to the "Uweu Sound 
 Sun ;" a series of charf^e.s, stated in such stronj^ lan^Ljua.ife and in such 
 general terms, that they could hardly have been justified had the 
 N<>bles been convicted a dozen time's foi various ofi'ences against the 
 
 f 
 
ty the F. 
 had sent 
 
 «*X|>»*CtV- 
 
 shHrmt'ii 
 
 li MM/."<I, 
 
 th.a t\n' 
 
 not IV'- 
 
 j» liy the 
 
 Jit thcif 
 
 ) iiitluiM' 
 
 that he 
 
 ntatioiis 
 
 kith tlif 
 
 II to th<' 
 
 ,'■> he tlic 
 
 ries Act 
 
 furs had 
 
 lat tiiey 
 
 M'v had 
 
 at tlu'ii' 
 
 t> th ' 
 s,that it 
 law and 
 «;es ha,d 
 ily dis 
 
 made 
 tlie F. 
 ill the 
 jtuhhc 
 Deputy 
 Hound 
 I in such 
 jid the 
 li.^t the 
 
 '•Fishci it's Ae't an(i Ki'Xid-'itions." 
 
 In ill'' iiii'iith Ui'.Iidy, IMM, a < 'i»niinissi(i:i vvas onlcrcil t<» issin' tm 
 till' ;ii\ ('sti;,'atiiih u:'tii«' cliiiii^cs rctcncrl t-., i»iii in sjdtc dt' (>ni|nii-i('.s \>\ 
 th»' N'ohh's as lo the tinu- mid |ilait' of hraiin;;, iiotliin;,' tiirther wm>^ 
 l.rard l>y ihiiii nut il oil Scj.triiilxf L'Jnil, iSi'l, a tel»'i:iaiii was sciil 
 tioiM <)Ma\\a adNlsiiijn' ihciii that the •' t'oiiiinission tor I n\eMti<;at ion 
 would iiK'ci on ScjitcnilM'r LlJith at Kili.iiiit'y. ThcMf l)fin,i; n<» tch- 
 :;ia]ih station at Killanicy it w.'.s ,sonn' days hetoic this t.'l(>t;rani 
 K'fu'ht'd (he Nolili's, when tlu^y iniincdiat* iy iiia<h' cNcry |ios,sihi«' jnc- 
 
 Had 
 
 In'cn niailc aifainst tlieni 
 
 I 
 
 jiaralio'i to meet tiir (•li:ir;^t's t'lat 
 althon^ha hii'.yc mnnlH'i tit' uitiu'.s.s('s were ncccssai'ily una\ailal)le,l)('iniLC 
 at \aiious places on ( "•'oiyian f'ay, en^ai^ed in lishiniL;,and it was conse- 
 • [uently not jiossihle to olttain their evidcnct* within the time limited. 
 
 The l.'oinmi.ssion haviinj; l)een lead, ahiiou,:^h it was in terms stat,ed 
 to l)e a C/oinmission tor investigation <»t' the char^'es that had Ijcen 
 niatle aifainst th»' NoWh's, the Commissioner ruled that the Nohles 
 weie Mjion their deh'iic;', and tiiat in any <ase he wjis not there to in- 
 vestigate any sudi chaii^es, 1 ait that the whole seope of the Commission 
 was to enahle the \ol)les to jx'oihu'c e\ ideiice of such »'.\tenuatiti^' eir- 
 cumstuMces as they niijj;lu (hv-^ire to hiinic t<t the notice of the Depart 
 menr, with relation onlv to tlif' seizure above referred to in tlie month 
 of Mav, 1<^!)4. 
 
 It became apparent as the Commission jir»»ceeded tliat tiu* Commis- 
 sioner, hafj, hefoi'c lea\in,L; Ottawa, determined u}>on this limitation of 
 the scope of the Commission, because he had n«»t brought witii him any 
 (locuments in the possession of tlie Dej)artment bearint; an earlier date 
 than April .SOtli, lSi)i>. 
 
 Counsel for t!ie Nobles asked to be allowt-d to peruse the Commis- 
 sion, in order to see the endorsemcMit by the ^[inister of the order al- 
 lowing the fyle of the D(>partment to l)e taken away by the Commis- 
 sioner, but this was peremptorily refused, the C.)ininissioner statin;L( 
 that he would not allow the Connnission t(» be seen, but would simj)ly 
 read it aloud, which he did, but (Hd n(»t read tiie endarsenuMit. 
 
 The Nobles then })roceeded, undei' pn)test, tu give evidence under the 
 ruling of the Commissioner, of the extenuating circumstances upon 
 which they relied as shewing their offence to have been merelv a tech- 
 
liiciil 'iiH- aiid |)rn\ ill;; tiinl tlicy liiul I;('<'ii drlilicrfitt'lv led \u\t> ;i tiii;* 
 In till' !•'. ( >., ,iiii| it is tint ton iui|. Ii tnsi\ tlii'V wjiollv siU'crt'<lr<l in 
 • jiiiiii; M). 
 
 Iiii'i»l('Mt;ilIy, it also iipitiMrctl tliat maiiv of t 'w clwii'ijt's wliirli had 
 ln'fii iiiadf uiraiiist tlicni, ;!nd those tlic imosi mtIi'IIs one"., vvt-rc aliso- 
 liitcly without, fouiidatioii, iiioic ]»ail icidarU that as to their haviiiL,' 
 li( en eoiivit ted ii|iiim |pie\ ion-; occasioie-. and ]iatt ieularly in the ye;;r 
 I HO'J of having; fished with seine-; on |'>onnl\ Island. Otli'-f stale- 
 ni-nts contained in Mr. llardees letter, and v.li'eh were donbtleHs 
 Iiu.s»m1 U|i(ai It Iters reeei\ed hy the I )e|iarl nient. weri- also sh( wn l) he 
 lint iiie. and in shoi't the falsity <'f the eharu'es ai^ainst the NoUles in 
 Lfenerhl was shewn when the I''. ' ). himself, admittedly Iiostile to iIk mi. 
 s\M»i'e that if it hud not been fm a certain iMiM\ieli.iii toi' the sale of 
 fish illi'ii-ally eauLrht. ill |S!):i. he would have leeonnnen.jed in t he spring 
 of this year that tlh' lie<'nses in (|iiestioii should l)e ;;;ia:ited to them. 
 In \ lew of this statement on <»ath, of an tiiiftiendly witiie^s,it can hard 
 1y he said that apart from the particular conviction refened to.and the 
 eircnimstaiin'H .surroiMidiiijj the seizure in (piesiion, the reeoi-d of the 
 Nol)l(>s can l>e such as to just if\ the inllietion up.>n thein of a line of 
 tli(tus!iiids<»f dollar's, worth of \esxels and plant, in addition to the <'on 
 secpiential damai'^es to their hu.siness. an*l the hnmiliation and injury 
 to their I'eputat ion necessarily followii'.L; from the \ iolent attack con 
 tained in Mr. Hardee's letter, which, in view of his ojlicial position, car 
 ried with all the weiirht attachiii'^ to an acl of ihe honnnion (lovern 
 mcnt. 
 
 In view of the fact that the inllietion of this loss upon the Xohh's 
 has Ijccii attempted to he justiti(»d by their ulleiied past I'ccord as viola- 
 tor's «(f the law, it may be well to say s(»methiii,i; uj^oii that pt»int befiuc 
 statin;; the circumstances in connection with tlie sei/.ui'c in (]ucsti<in, 
 notwithstaridir);,' the fact that by the ruling' r-efcrred to. the past re- 
 cord of the Nobles lias been e.xcluded fr-om the scope of the Commis- 
 sion. 
 
 First, as to the alle<;e(l conviction in the year 1S9-5, which the F. O. 
 stated upon oath, to have been his sole !j:r'ourul for r'cfusini; to I'eeom- 
 mend the Xobles' application for- license.'-. It appeai-s that dui'inu; that 
 year- a char'fi;e was laid aijain.st tiie Nobles before the V. 0.. who lias the 
 
 |oi 
 
 '!>' 
 
 i!i.| 
 
 on 
 
 a hi 
 
 Till 
 
 lalJ 
 
ilo il tl'llj* 
 
 (•(•*'( 
 
 Ir.l 
 
 III 
 
 ■lii.'li Im'I 
 
 tTC illlHd- 
 
 •ir liaviiiL; 
 
 tlic yi'!:r 
 lli'f sl.ilc- 
 
 (litnl)t l("s> 
 
 I WM t'l It,' 
 
 Nuhirs ill 
 I' t'l Hiciii. 
 
 the sjjriiijn' 
 
 to tliriii. 
 
 (■ill) liiii'd 
 (•.;il.(l the 
 <1 nt* tlic 
 
 a fine (tf 
 I t he coll 
 1(1 ill j my 
 
 Ut'k COM 
 
 lion, cur 
 
 (JoVCIM 
 
 ■ Nohlcs 
 
 iis \ iohi 
 
 lit licl'oic 
 
 ||ucstioii, 
 
 Jl.'lSt 1-c- 
 
 ICoinniis- 
 
 ric F. (). 
 
 iveoiii 
 jitiLj that 
 lias tl'.c 
 
 powers ot' ,1 .lusl ice of tlic I'ciicc uiiilcr llic Ad. for Ituyinu- a Miiall 
 i|iiaiititv ot" |»icl:crcl which it was allcu;c«l tlicy knew to lia\c hccii 
 illc'^'ally caiiiilil. 'I'lic summons was ma<lc ictuiiiahlc at Little ('iirreiil 
 on .Miinitoillin Ishilld (Mi the lelnill. Messrs. Nolde aiUK'llied to 
 
 aiisuer lo il l.et'oie i he l-'ishery < )iricer. Mr. i)iiues, .1. 1'., ant! .Mr. 
 Tiiikiss. -1. ['. .Mr. I'llliott ii|i|M'arim^ a-^ |trose>'utor. olijection was 
 taken as lo his sill iiif;' upon (he liciich. ami he lliereii|Hiii ujidcrtook (o 
 .(djoiirii the inaltir tor a week, at the end ol' which time lie u^ain a)t- 
 |)»,ired with Mr. (ieorne r»iirden. Police .Ma;^ist r;ile, at theSault. Mr. 
 Ihirden declined to allow the other Mai,asl rales to sit with him on the 
 I.eiich, wheieiipon he was reminded that ManJtoulin Island wasnoi 
 within hi.s jurisdiction, and the other iiiaufiHl rates then proceeded to'liear 
 th«' case. Mr. Klliott retV.sin;; tit proceed t'liither with it het'orc iheiii, 
 ' he Mu<fist rates called upon him to do so, and dismissed the case, and a 
 I'oiiiial record ol' the discharge was haialed to ! he Nohles .\ short 
 limeat'ler thi.^- tin- I'olice Ma'iist rat c came to Killariiey, and issued ;i 
 summons in respect ot the same chari.ce, returnahle in twti or thiee 
 hours het'orc him.selt". Messrs. Nohle, w Ik'Ii serxed with the summons, 
 produced the record t>\' their dischariie, and declined to appear het'ore 
 ihirdcii, who in tlii>ir alisence undertook to intlict upon tiiem a line 
 ani(aintin;j: alto}{t'ther to s:i7t).tH). Ill'' Nohles havin«^' refu.sed to pay 
 this line, the papers were sent to the I )e|iartiiient, when it was as a 
 matter ot" course not eiit'orccd. 
 
 .Messrs. Nohle stated on oath liefore the Commissioner that in the 
 course of thirty years, during which t ime they h,id either hy them 
 selves or thr«ai,yh their cmployt'i^s activelv en<^rao;ed in the lisher\ 
 husiness, they had never heeii convicted of .an oli'ence until the occasion 
 of the sei/urt! in u^uestion, mi the Spring- of this \{'u\ with the excep 
 t ion «»f the alleLfcd conviction, the I'ircum-taiiccs of which are ahove 
 stated and in respect of which they had n<tl paid one dollar for either 
 line or costs. 
 
 The F. O. was compelled to state that he had never known of a 
 sinjL;le con\ iction au'aiiist them and that he had never even heard of 
 one, and in short, as ahove stated, swore more than once, durinij; his 
 examination, that his sole reason for refusiii;; to rei'omm'iiid thi.'m for 
 license was th<^ said alleijed conviction. 
 
Till" F. ( ). aitjicn-cW lict'orc tlic CoiniiiissioiiHi', \v;is prcsfiit when tlic 
 Xuhlcs y;i\<' ('\ idem c, l)iit did hot juil a siiit;;l(' <|\i('sti<>ii to tliciii i* - 
 .Hfiidiiii; tlif'if allcuf'd violations; of tlic law, alt!iou,i,di tlic (Joinniissioiici- 
 (']i('j)ly statt'd ill liis picsciM-c tliat he was tlicic for tlic jtuiposr (»f art- 
 iiiy- as rounscl aijainst tiu* Nohics. Moie tiiaii tliat, tlic N<»hlcs 
 d< niaiidcd. in tlic ]iicsciicc of the ('oiiiniissioMcr,that chaises shonid Ijc 
 made ayaiiist them, and juililiely challtiiiied the I''. < ). to i^o into the 
 witness lu»\, and slate anything' he knew ai^ainst them, hut he |)ositi\ely 
 iefnsedto(h» so, and it is siihmittcd that nothin*.' cm shew neie 
 elea'ly that it was out of his jiowcm- to estahlish the ehar<,'es eontained 
 in his rejioits to the l)e[)ar'tment. than tlic fact that he was eomjiclled 
 to stat<' that lait foe tlie one ehaiLre icfeiied to. their conduct was 
 such that he would liaxc teconiniciidcd tlicii- a])i)lication for licenses. 
 
 How would it lie jiossihle to justify the total luin of the husincss 
 of a liiiii of mcichants, the infliction upon them of a loss amountinirto 
 tens of thousands of dollars, hy reason of a paltry con\iction for the 
 sale <»f a few illei^ally caujiht Hsh : and it seems simply moiistr<ius that 
 such action should he tMken and attemptefl to he justified hy a con\ic- 
 tioii which could not he enfoi'ced : and, if iii addition, it is shewn hy the 
 e\i<lence taken u]>on the Conmiission, that the oflence which was sou;/ht 
 to he made the occasion of the infliction <if such a punishment was n<it 
 only a merely technical one, but was hrouuht ahout hy moans of a trap 
 deliherately laid hy the (i<tvei'niiient Officer, in orch-r to induce the tin- 
 fortunate men to commit a breach of the IJe^ulations ujion which he 
 relies, surely e\ery possible means shoulrl be taken to compensate them 
 f(»r the loss they have sufi'ered. 
 
 Not only does tlie evidence taken before: the Commissioner prove 
 that the F (). deliberately led the Nobles into a tr-ap, concealed fr»»m 
 (hem that there was any jirobability of theii" licenses l)eing i'efused,but 
 by aflida\its which were sent to the Commissioner, shortly aftei- the 
 closijiLT of the Commission, and particularly l>y the alKdavit of Mr. 
 Lon<?, which was afterwaj'ds obtained at Collingwood and forwarded to 
 the Connuissioner, it has been sliewn that even in resj>ect of tlie convic- 
 tion for tishing without a license, upon the occasion in (|uestion. the 
 unfortunated men wej-e entrapped and deceived into a jilea of <;uilty, 
 in order that a coiivicti<»n mi.^lit he rei;istereil auainst theni for the 
 
 pni 
 
 pro 
 j)ar 
 
 ) ha( 
 
 I ap 
 
when the 
 I tluMii i( - 
 itnissidiici' 
 
 iSt' of JU't- 
 
 lic Nobles 
 should Ije 
 
 :o into the 
 j)ositi\<'ly 
 
 hew in-fe 
 eontaiiHvl 
 eoiniielleil 
 
 [uhiet WiiN 
 
 lieenses. 
 
 e business 
 
 lountinir to 
 
 m t'of the 
 
 ;trous that 
 ii eonvie- 
 wn hy tlie 
 
 ,vas souvfht 
 it Wiis not 
 of a tvaj) 
 ee the uii- 
 wliich he 
 siite them 
 
 liei- {irove 
 lied t'fdiii 
 4'used,l)Ut 
 
 liiftei' the 
 of Mr. 
 Ivurded to 
 lie couvie- 
 Ition, the 
 [f iruilty, 
 for the 
 
 pui'poses of the seizure iind conliseiition of their vessels, and that as is 
 pi-oved by tlie letter of the Poliet; Magistrate himself, the latter was a 
 party to the fraud, and while rej)!'es"ntiii,L!: to tljeni ihat the eonvietion 
 had nothing to do with the seizure;, and thit he i"e;;arded the ofTence as 
 a pun^ly teehnical one, and that he would .so report to the Department 
 in their favour in order tiiat the tu-^s and boats seized mi^ht b«' im- 
 UHHliatelv returned ; instead of so doiiiij x'ut in a mr»st malieious and 
 libellous report, based upon !ioe\iden( e whatever, and simply, so far as 
 i'.iin be learnefl, from the verbal st;iteMi!'iits of the V. (). Mr. Lonj; and 
 the Nobles had come prepaied t(» defend the case, but upon bein;jt 
 assured that the offence was reL'ar<le'l as merelv t(H'hnical, and that a 
 nominal fine would be im])osed, a^reerl to a plea of j;uilty, an<l went 
 home fully believin<:f <^hat the matter had been satisfactorily ari-an^ed 
 and that their vessels would be released in a ft!W days. The Ma<,'isti'ate 
 after pr(»misin,Lj the Nobles and .Mr. Lon;;, who apjteared in tlujir iii- 
 terests, that he would lejioit to the Department in their favour as 
 above stated, and after havin<:j actu.illy rep(trted aijainst them, was dis- 
 honest enou;j;h to wi-ite Mr. Loni,', enclosint; a copy of the formal n'cord 
 of what took place in court before him, i-eferrinj; to his malicious le- 
 port sent in by him as bavins^ doubtless inlluenced the Department in 
 favour of the Noble.s, as shewn by the fact that the sale of the ves,sels 
 .seized had been postponed. 
 
 Jiefore considerinj; the »nidence adduced before the Commi.ssioner, 
 in support of the ccmtention of the Nobles that they had been led into 
 a trap by the F.O., and that lie had acted malici»tusly and unfairly to- 
 wards them, whihf not enforcin;; the re;,'ulations in (piestion as ai,Minst 
 others, a word may be said as to the disadvantages under which the 
 N^obles labourefl in bi-inginj^ any evidence at all before the Commis- 
 sioner. 
 
 Ti; has already been pointed out that the notice j^iven to them of 
 the sittinj,' of the Connnission was entirely insutKcient to enable them 
 to j)!'epare their case or to obtain the attendance of witnesses. IJy 
 the ruling of the Commissioner, and particularly by his omission to 
 bring the file of the Department relating to the matters which were 
 within the real scope of the Commi>-sion, they were entirely taken by 
 surprise, Jtnd simply ha(l to get what evidence happened to be immedi- 
 
10 
 
 i 
 
 Jitely Hv;iiliil)I<' ill rrlatittn t<i the s'oi/u»«' of tlicir .rsu'ls. Tli<» F ( ». 
 was )tres«'iit fit the Coniinissioiis and not only had he taken no stejis 
 whatever t(»an'unj;e tor siK'li evidence as nii<;ht Inin^ facts to tlie know- 
 ledj;e of the Connnissioner, hut he had n(»t hrou^lit a single paper, and 
 his letter hor»ks, corresponchMice and other papers in his poss(.'ssion had 
 heen left at Sault Ste Marie. 
 
 Taken by surprise, in this way the Nobles iiad no alternative except 
 to call as th(>ir witness the K.O., althitu*;!) they well knew that he was 
 bitterly hostile to them, and would eadeavoui- to injure them in evei-y 
 possible way, and they accoi-din<,dy reipiested him to give evidence. 
 What followed was most extraordinarv : KLLIOTF HEFTSED 
 TO (ilVE EVIJ)ENC'K. A (iovernment Otiicer. holding a judicial 
 position, refused to testify to facts within his knowledge iiefore a(j<»v- 
 ernment C<tmmission issued for the investigation of those facts, and 
 publicly shewed his malice against men whose business is entirely at 
 his mercy, and whom he jiad by all means in his p«>wer emle ivoured 
 to I'uin. Why? Either liecause he kne a facts which would tell in 
 their favor. (»r because he had grossly slandered them in his reports t<» 
 the Government. 'I'he result shewed that he was probably actuated 
 by both mcttives. 
 
 The Conimissionei" I'efused to comjtel him to testify, although his 
 powers under the Act were expressly pointed «>ut, and he adj«»urne i 
 the Connnission until tiie following day for the exj)ress purpose «)f en- 
 abling Elliott to consider his evidence, thereby not oidy taking away 
 from the Nobles the advantage of beinir able to examine him befoi'e 
 he could consider the ett'ect of his evidence, l)ut causing them consider- 
 able additional ex[)ens«' by prolonging the sitting of the Connnission. 
 
 Even more serious obstacles were placed in the way of the Nobles, 
 in endeavouring t(» elicit facts from the P.O., by the positive refusal of 
 the Commissioner to allow them to see even those papers which he had 
 brought from the Department for the purpose of the investigation, tor 
 it will readily be seen that it was impossible properly to conduct the 
 examination without knowing what Elliott had stated in his letters t^» 
 the Department. The Connnissioner, however, after having at first 
 refused to giv(» any information as to what documents he had, finally 
 agreed that he w«»uld read such portions as he might see fit. in tlie pre- 1 
 
 s»1 
 
 N 
 
 a(i 
 
I 
 
 Tl.e F (». 
 I no stP})s 
 
 » tl«H klH)\V- 
 
 jtaptT, and 
 session had 
 
 live t'xcept 
 ,hat he was 
 ii in every 
 s evidence. 
 iEKrSED 
 
 a judicial 
 'tore a Gov- 
 
 facts, and 
 entirely at 
 nde ivoured 
 uld tell in 
 s repoi'ts to 
 actuated 
 
 iou;{h his 
 adjourne t 
 ose of en- 
 :in<; away 
 irn hefoi'e 
 n considei'- 
 niission. 
 le Nobles, 
 
 refusal of 
 ich he hud 
 ifation, for 
 nduct the 
 ! letters ti> 
 g at first 
 d, finally 
 
 n the pre- 
 
 i 
 
 n 
 
 sfhce of the witness, hefttre allowing the exaniination ttt j)roceed, and 
 all efiorts of (.Counsel to obtain further concessions were unavailing. 
 Notwithstaixling all these <lisiulvantages the K. O. was compelled to 
 admit : 
 
 First : That li<- had favouied the conijKtitors of the Nobles at their 
 expense, and that he had himself broken the regulations in onler tod<t 
 so. The witness Malcolm was on S(|uaw Island wIhmi the seizure was 
 ma<le. ('n May Htli his sail boat was tlu're fishing in charge of his 
 brother, and no li<'en.se had even been applied for. Kx[)ecting s<'i/,urp, 
 all niovejilile ai tides were taken out of the boat, but Malcolm obtained 
 a private inter\ie\v with Klliott, and it aj>pearing that he was dealing 
 not with the Nobles but with the riv.il C'om}>any, Elliott stated that 
 he could arrange it all right, that he had a licen.se in his pocket tor a 
 man named iJishop, who was' not going t(» use it, and that he would 
 ti'ansfer it t») Malcolm, which he accordingly undertook to do, by en- 
 (hiseuK'iit uj.on the license,contrary to one of the Fishery Regulations 
 most stringently insisted up<»n. 
 
 When, on the following «hiy, Elliott proceeded to Byng Inlet to seize 
 the remainder of the Nobles' Ijoats, this man Matthew Bishop was 
 there fishing an<l was not interfered with, In'cau.se, as the F. (). well 
 knew, his license had been sejit and should have Yyeeu in his possession. 
 Filliott at first attempted to deny the facts, but was finally conii)elled 
 to a<lmit fully the truth «»f Malcolm's statement, and to stat«^ the real 
 story of the transfer of this license. 
 
 It ajtpeaied that the rival cojnpany had sent in I>isho{)"s application 
 for the licen.se, expecting that he would fish for them, but, having 
 aftei'wai'ds, ipiarrelled with him, complained to the F. (). that Bishop 
 had broken faith with them, an<l was giung to fish for the Nobles, 
 wiiereupon the F. (>. undertook to take away his license and give it to 
 a man who was not dealing with the men who were .so obnoxious to 
 him. 
 
 Th'^ result wa.s, two men fished all season on one license, by this 
 a.ssumj)ti(»ti of authority «)n the part of the F. (>., which, if permitted 
 by the Department, would defeat the whole effect of the Fishery 
 Regulations, place all power in the hands of the Overseer, and render 
 any action by the De})artnjent a mere formality. 
 
12 
 
 It was alsoproved by Malcolm uiul AlhiTt Low, that at tlic tine 
 of the seizuiv, there were many bouts of the rival Company, including 
 two steam tu<j;s, without license, to the knowledge of the F. O , who 
 did not interfere with any «tf them, and l)ominick Ilosseau proved 
 that the ochei- Comi»any had no license for their boats at the time of 
 the seizure. The F. (). at Hrst contradicted the evidence of the inen, 
 but was afterwards compelled to admit tlie truth of nearly all the state- 
 ments made by them, or at least to say, that he could not contradict 
 them, and attempted to justify his failure to seize the other tuys by 
 saying that he knew the licenses were on their way, or at (Polling- 
 wood. 
 
 Owing to the fact that the F'. O. had not brought any of his books 
 and papers, the Nobles weii> compelled to call the Manager of the rival 
 Company, in order to prove the date of their ai)plication for license, 
 which was May 17th, 1804, and this witness undertook to say that In- 
 always received his license hefore starting out to fish, and had done so 
 for three years past, evidence which was contradicted by every witness 
 called, and by the F. O. himself, who stated that these regulations 
 -/ere only made for 1893, and were not enforced even in that year. 
 
 Secondly: The F. O. was compelled to admit that it was true, as 
 stated by the No]>les, that where the i-(!gulations had been allowed to 
 fall in abeyance, a year's grace was allowed, at least in one instance, to 
 a man named S. F. lleeves, to dispose of his plant. The regnlaticms 
 oidy allow one man license for five pr)und nets, whereas, lleeves had 
 for some time past, been fishing with no less than sixteen pound nets, 
 thereby destroying great quantities of fish. When the regulations 
 were enforced, Reeves nevertheless received his license for sixteen 
 pound nets, upon the understanding that they would not Vie renewed 
 for another year. It will be remembered that this fact was positively 
 denied by Mr. Hardee in his letter to the "Owen Sound Sun." 
 
 Thirdly : The fact that the seizure this Spring was the result of a 
 deliberate and malicious trap by the F. O., for the Nobles, was absol- 
 utely proved up(m his own admissions. 
 
 Owing to the omission by the Commissioner to bring Elliott's letters 
 and reports written during the winter of 189li-94, it was impossible t<» 
 get at the instructions from the Department to him, over the same 
 
li-i 
 
 ,t the tin e 
 •, including? 
 F. O, wh.» 
 eau proved 
 he time <tf 
 )t' the men, 
 11 the state - 
 contradict 
 er tu,!L,'s l)y 
 at ('oUiug- 
 
 f his books 
 
 of the rival 
 
 tor license, 
 
 say that hi- 
 
 had done so 
 
 k^ery witness 
 
 regulations 
 
 lat year. 
 
 s true, as 
 
 allowed to 
 
 instance, to 
 
 regulaticms 
 
 leev(^s hafi 
 
 |)!)und nets. 
 
 regulations 
 
 or sixteen 
 
 )e renewed 
 
 s positively 
 
 n." 
 
 esult of a 
 was absol- 
 
 ptt's letters 
 lipossible to 
 the same 
 
 period, in order to ascertain what reference was made in this corres- 
 pondence to the Nol)l<'s" licenses. Klliott. however, admitted, that at 
 some time (hirinj; tlie wintei'. he had made up his mind nctt to recom- 
 mend their ajtphcati.tn tor licenses, and he admitted that he knew it 
 was not tlie custom of the hepartmejit to grant any license which was 
 not reconunended by the 1'". O. He stated, that within his kn(»wledge, 
 no in.'-tance had ever occurred of the granting of a license by the 
 Department where the api»hcation had not been reconunended by the 
 F. ( ). 
 
 He was in constant cori-espondence with the Nobles during the 
 whole of that winter, and. on .January lOth, wrote to them that he 
 would n(»t reooniniend fishermen for license who did not send in a 
 ivtui'n of theii- fish for the previous season, HUT iiK Din not cive them 
 THE SLIGHT i:s'r hint that hi<: did not intend to hecommend tHeih lic- 
 enses. ( )n March I 4th, their application was sent to him, with a cheipie 
 for 82.S0, the auKtunt (sf fees for licenses applied for. Although it had 
 never been thecust(»m. in formei- years, to demand payment <»f discount 
 on che(pies, he underto;ik to return this cheipie, with the paltry excuse 
 that he would n(»t accept it without payment of iirl.Or) discount. The 
 application was for a large nund)er of separate licenses, and all that he 
 need have done was to have retained one 85 license, as against the dis- 
 count, but thei'e can be no doubt that he deliberately seized upon this 
 excuse to delay theii application, in ordei- that he might not be com- 
 pelled to notify them of the refusal of their licenses, until after they 
 had sent their boats t(j the fishing grounds. 
 
 It is submitted, that if the Nobles could urge no (»thei- extenuating 
 circumstances than this contemjytible and malicious action, on the part 
 of the F. O., that they would be entitled to a return of the property 
 seized. E\(mx if, which is certainly not the case, it was true, as is 
 sworn to by FiUiott, that the boats of the rival Company had their 
 licenses at the time (»f the seizure, he is nevertheless i-esponsible for 
 the failure to notify the Nobles in tinie, their application having been 
 sent in three days earlier, as proved by Clark, while the hesult wa.s not 
 
 MADE KNOWN TO THEM, UNTIL NEARLY THREE WEEKS AFTER FISHINt; HAD 
 
 BEEN COMMENCED by both Companies. 
 
 It was proved, beyond ({uestion, that it had always been the custom 
 
14 
 
 ill fonn^ryears for vessels to gcout ejulyin April, iis soon as the ice would 
 permit, without waiting for licenses, which freipjently did not arrive 
 forf(tur, five, or six weeks afterwai-ds, and that if they waited for their 
 licenses, they would lose one of the best and most i)roHtal)le parts of 
 tlie season. « 
 
 Elliott stated, that in 1H9.% a notification had i)eeii sent to the effect 
 that boats should not go out without a license, but that it had- not 
 been enforced. At some time duiin« March, 18!)4, a similar notice 
 was circulated, and the Nobles themselves posted a copy on their 
 wharf, and gave evidence THAT IT WAS KXi'KKssr.v in hkason of this 
 
 XOTICE THAT THEY SENT IN TIII.IK APPLICATION ON THE 14tH OK MaRCII, 
 
 eai'ly enough f(»r them to receive their licenses beft»re fishing commenced; 
 but neither this company, nor any other fishennen, sui)posed it was the 
 intention of the l)epartment to c(mipel them to lose one of the most 
 profitable portions of the season, because there was some flelay in 
 answering their applications, and, as before stated, all vessels went out 
 at the opening of navigation, expecting their licenses to arrive in due 
 coui'se. 
 
 The postincj of this he(;ulation is aiisolutelv tj k only reason 
 oivEN Hv Elliott to justify the seizure in (^estion. 
 
 The Nobles stated jxtsitively, that they had ausolutely no reason 
 
 TO EXPECT that THERE WOULD BE ANY TROUHLE ADOUT THEIR APPLICA- 
 TION FOR LICENSES, AND ElLIOTT CORROBORATED THIS STATEMENT, SO far 
 
 as his knowledge went. 
 
 As has been already stated, Elliott concealed the fact of his refusal 
 to recoriimend the application of the Nobles, gave them no hint that it 
 was possible that the Department might refuse to issue licenses to 
 them, and deliberately, by a paltry trick, delayed their a|)plication, so 
 that an answer could not be received in time, but his conduct in that 
 respect, however, was honourable and straightforward compared with 
 what followed. On the 28th and 29th of April, he met Charles Noble, 
 
 HE THEN KNEW THAT NO LICENSES WOULD BE ISSUED TO THE NOBLES. 
 He DID NOT <UVE THE SLKJHTEST HINT OF THAT FACT, BUT ASKED NoBLE 
 
 IF HIS BOATS AND VESSELS HAD ciONE OUT. The latter answered him frankly 
 and openly, without the slightest hesitation, that they had gone, and 
 thereupon, Elliott immediately telegraphed to the Department that 
 
1.") 
 
 p ice would 
 U(»t arrive 
 (I for their 
 ■ pnrts of 
 
 1 tlie eflfect 
 
 had- not 
 
 lar notice 
 
 (tn their 
 
 r OF THIS 
 
 )K March, 
 •ntnienced; 
 it was the 
 ' the most 
 delay in 
 s went out 
 ive in due 
 
 -Y RKAHON 
 
 I) HKASON 
 APPLICA- 
 
 :nt, so far 
 
 s refusal 
 nt that it 
 senses to 
 
 ation, so 
 in that 
 
 ed with 
 es Noble, 
 
 BLKS. 
 
 I) Noulk 
 n frankly 
 one, and 
 mt that 
 
 tl'.e Nohles were fishinjj; witluait a license, and askin<; instructions, 
 which were alisolutely unnecessary, «'xcei>t to pi-otect himself, as he 
 had ample )>ower to seize Ixtats ille^^ally Hshinj; without any sj«>cial 
 iiistructi(»ns. There can he no dispute upon these points, for they are 
 admitted hy Klliott himself. 
 
 KlMOTT, TIIKN, OIITAINEU TIIK IXFoHMATloN II'ON WIIK 11 
 
 MIS TKLKfiRAM WAS |«ASK1) FR<)M 
 
 NoHLK IIIMSKLF 
 
 A I' 
 
 "UK 
 
 SaULT, ALLOWKI) TIIK LATTKR TO LKAVK WITIIOi: 
 
 TIIK SI.Klir 
 
 i;sT MINT 
 
 THAT 
 
 ANV SF.IZIIRK WAS 
 
 (oNTKMPLATKI). 
 
 MOU 
 
 l)tl 
 
 <'SS 
 
 hecauf-e, as is un(|uestional)ly the case, a hint to Nohle at that time, 
 [would have spoiled the whole trap, and would, as Nohle himself swoi-e. 
 
 11 
 
 lave rcsu 
 
 I ted 
 
 HI an imme 
 
 diate (trder hv him to their vessels to cease 
 
 |fishin<;. Elliott merely waited for his instructions to make the seizure. 
 [an<l pi'(miptly carried them into ertect, thereby causing enoi-mous loss 
 [to the Nohles. ridiculously out of pi'opoi-tion to the ort'ence charged, 
 and absolutely with no other justification than the Notice sent anumd 
 via few months before, which, as above stated, no tisjicfuian on the 
 iGeoi'jL^ian Hay expected to be enforced, any m(»re than in former years, 
 iif the licenses did not airive in time. 
 
 Not oidy was the Department, at the time of the seizure, in possess- 
 ion of the sum of !?-S0, paid by the Nobles foi- theii- licenses, which 
 was not returned until long afterwards, but, even now. all the money 
 paid by the Nobles for licenses for boats which have been seized, con- 
 fiscated and actually sold, has not been returned, for, as was proved 
 before the Commissioner, the sum of i?L'.") was paid thnnij^h Overseei- 
 Jackson, in respect of some of the boats seized by Elliott, and this 
 money is now in the possession of the Department, unless, as may be 
 the case, it has been embezzled by «»ne of their officers, a fact which 
 can nuike no difference to the Nobles' lisrhts. 
 
 Tt was also proved, and this fact alone should entitle the Nobles to 
 a return of their vessels and a renewal of their licenses, that at the 
 very time of the seizure the boats weie proceedinj; to lift the nets. 
 ■'^ in order to cease fishing, as the Nobles had ordered them to do by 
 f telegram, immediately upon learning the actual j)osition of the mattei-. 
 Disastrous as this action of the F. O. has been to the Nobles, it has 
 borne, perhaps, even more hardly ui)on the unfortunate fishermen, whose 
 
1« 
 
 JipplieutionN wcic refused hikI lioiits sei/cd, for no dtluM- reason than 
 that Ixicause their applications were forwar'ded throiiji^h the Nohles. 
 Klliott, b(!cause they were dealinjj witli the ohn;»xious firm, involved 
 them in th«' ruin he was i)lunnin<i for the latter. Kvidenee in the form 
 of depositions of liolu'it J^oyter, David ^leCoy, .Josepii Bernard, I). 
 Mcdillivi-ay and Charles Tillson, witnesses who eould not he brouj^ht 
 in jierson l)efoi'e the Commissioner, wa.« handed in, |)rovin;,' in the Hist 
 place that Klliott had publicly stated his intentions of luining the 
 Nobles, and although he chose to deny this, there is no reason to suj>- 
 pose that these men had any object in swearing' to a di lil)ei'ate false- 
 IkmkI; particularly when it would brinj,' down u|)on them the malice of 
 the I"'. ()., who had such extensive p(»weis over them. 
 
 In the second place, these men say that they have lost their seasons 
 tishinu, that they have l(»st their ijoats, and that they have never been 
 convipted of violatin<^ any <»f the Fishery Laws ; that their ruin has 
 been s(» complete, that they did nttt know how they could ^et through 
 the following winter, and that when they complained to PjUiott, he 
 stated that their boats had been seized, because he thougiit they were 
 working for the Nobles, and he suj)itosed that their boats and rigs 
 belonged to t!iem, although Iw was, in thi.s, as is shewn, entiiely mis- 
 taken. 
 
 All ok TMIi STATKMKNTS IN THKSK AFFIDAVITS WERK ADMITTED BY 
 
 Elliott in his evidence to be absolutely thue. 
 
 The i-esult is, that when challenged. Elliott was not only not able to 
 establish the charges previously made against the Nobles, upon which 
 the Depai'tment supjuKsed that the seizure or confiscation would be 
 justified, l)Ut admitted that his sole reason for preventing them from 
 getting their licenses was the conviction of 18S>.'i, which, was in fact, 
 n(» conviction at all ; that the whole conviction and seizure in question, 
 was the result of a delibeiate trap. It is not too much to sfiy, in view 
 of the evidence, that this trap was dishonestly and fraudulently set for 
 them by the F. ()., and that even when it came to the formal charge 
 before the Magistrate, the Nobles were deceived into abandoning their 
 idea of defending it upon all the grounds above indicated; and that by 
 the conduct of the F. O., a man who tmght to hold a judicial and 
 impartial position, not only have the Nobles been practically I'uined, 
 
17 
 
 'casoii than 
 tln' Nobles. 
 n, involved 
 in the form 
 iernai'd, I). 
 be l)roii<,'ht 
 ; in the Hist 
 luinin*; the 
 ,son to suj»- 
 ei-ate false- 
 le malice of 
 
 leii' season's 
 nevei' been 
 
 ir ruin has 
 
 Lfet through 
 Elliott, he 
 they were 
 
 ts and rigs 
 itirely mis- 
 
 iMiTTEi) nv 
 
 not able to 
 Ipon which 
 
 would be 
 [hem fi'om 
 Is in fact, 
 |i question, 
 liy, in view 
 [tly set for 
 lial charge 
 )ning theii- 
 [id that by 
 
 licial and 
 ruined. 
 
 ^ 
 
 if 
 
 but unf«»rtunate lishermen liave, througli his mistake, been brought to 
 the verge of starvation ; and it is submitte<l, that had the past record 
 of the Nobles been all tliat it su|)|»o.sed to have Immmi by the Depart- 
 ment, it would yet be impossible t(» uphold tin* cordi^cation brought 
 about bv such dishonest and frau(hdent means. How much more tht>n 
 should justice Im;' <lone to the Nobles, in y'ww of the fact that Klliott s 
 i-eports to the |)epartm<iit have now In^en shewn to be a tissue of 
 slanders and falsehotKJ, which he has not e\en attempted to justify 
 befoi-e the Comnnssioner appointed to inxestigate them. As if it were 
 not sutHcient for a merely technical oH'ence against tlie Kishery Hegu- 
 lati<»ns, brttught about by a fraudulent trap, to iidlict a loss of !*25.000 
 upon a business linn, the decision arri\ed at before tin* recent investi- 
 gation, apjiears to lia\e been that im» license should be issiie<l to the 
 Nobles in future, thereby insuring their total ruin l>y renilering Nalue- 
 less any property that the V. ( ). had been unabh* to sci/e. 
 
 This would be iiuthing less than persecution, and the onlv lesson 
 that the tishermen of the North Shore coidd learn from such a decis- 
 ion would be that at all hazards they must bow to every whim and 
 caprice<tf the I'ishecy ( )vei'seer ; aral, j)eihaps, that the Fishei-y liegtda- 
 tions nmst lu- dbsctx cd unless the Overseer- in his w isdom chooses to 
 disregard them.