IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) h A ,% %^ :/ 1.0 ^1^ IIM I.I !!f !^ Ilia 11-25 i 1.4 1.6 7^ vl />< ^^^V '>>' >^ •W^'W o 7 4^ A^ iV \\ ^9> V ^^^ <«^7*. '<(*S %^ <* ^' CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian institute for Historical Microreproductions Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 1980 Technical Notes / Notes techniques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Physical fe''':ures of this copy which may alter any of the inr ages in the reproduction are checked below. L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Certains ddfauts susceptibles de nuire d la quality de la reproduction sont not6s ci-dessous. n Coloured covers/ Couvertures de couleur D Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur Coloured maps/ Cartes gdographiques en couleur Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages d6color6es, tachet6es ou piquies D D Coloured plates/ Planches en couleur Show through/ Transparence D Tight binding (may cause Shadows or distortion along interior margin)/ Reliure serrd (peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion le long de la marge intdrieure) D Pages damaged/ Pages endommag^es D Additional comments/ Commentaires suppl6mentaires Bibliographic Notes / Notes bibliographiques D El Only -edition available/ Seule Edition disponible Bound with other mateHal/ Reli6 avec d'autres documents D Pagination incorrect/ Erreurs de pagination Pages missing/ Des pages manquent D D Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque Plates missing/ Des planches manquent D Maps missing/ Des cartes gdographiques manquent n Additional comments/ Commentaires suppldmentaires The images appearing here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in keeping with the filming contract specifications. Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et de la nettetd de Texempiaire filmd, et en conformity avec les conditions du contrat de filmage. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol —^-(meaning CONTINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Un des symboles suivants apparaTtra sur la der- nidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbols — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbols V signifie "FIN". The original copy was borrowed from, and filmed with, the kind consent of the following institution: Library of the Public Archives of Canada Maps or plates too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right an^l top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: L'exempiaire filmd fut reproduit grfice d la g6n6rosit6 de I'dtabiissement prdteur suivant : La bibliothdque des Archives publiques du Canada Les cartes ou les planches trop grandes pour dtre reproduites en un seul cliche sont filmdes d partir de Tangle supdrieure gauche, de gauche d droite et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images ndcessaire. Le diagramme suivant illustre la m6thode : 1 2 3 1 2 3 i e swwjHWHWBUjii iiL M' f^ ji;"gyp ' wTO>s>rr - 7 '*'' " ■ n^iiff iitAT r hiAt >.» Ju^i^^div »"i'- •<--/« . , i.'/ sttttftttifi FOURTH SESSION. FIFTH PARLIAMENT.— 49 VIC. '^" SPEECH OF HON. E^' StAKE, M.P., 0» ar*^ ••'„-j?'Hr • HOME RULE FOR IRELAND. OTTAWA, MAY 4th, 1886. .. .V- Mr. BLAKB. I rise for a moment to intercept that ques- tion, in order to bring before the House another, in which the last House showed a deep concern — I mean the Irish question. In 1880, I spoke my views upon this subject, and expressed my belief and hope that we should at no distant day see a measure of Home Ilule granted to Ireland. In the year 1882, the question was moved on the other side of this House. At that time we, on this side, heartily co-ope- rated in order to give the greatest possible weight to the proposed action. Then I spoke at length my opinions upon the whole question, which saves me from the necessily of trespasting now upon the time of this House, and since that time, to the best of my humble powc, here and elsewhere, I have aided in the advancement of that cause. Since thni a new Canadian House of Commons baa been electoa, which House has not yet spoken upon the question. Since 1b( n great events have transpired in the United Kingdom itself. The people, both of Ireland and Great Briliiin, have received for the first time a very full measure of representation in Parliament. The Irish people, under that measure of represeutution, have, by an enormous, an overwhelming majority, pronounced in favor of Home Rule, and the great statesman who leads Her Majesty's Govern- ment has recognised the vital necessity of grappling at once with the question ; and Her Majesty's Government have, as I ventured to suggest on a former occasion, seen the propriety of themselves formu- lating a plan for the settlement of that question. Now, Sir, a controversy has arisen on some of the more important details of that meaieuie. I do not, myself, admire all those details. For example, admitting the great difficulties, I should yet prefer, to the prese: t plan for the exclusion of Ireland from the management of Imperial afifairs in which she is interested, i "c continued representa- tion for those Imperial purposes a an Iraporiul Pailia- men — I should prefer the plan, notwithstanding its great difficulty, of her retaining that share of coalrol. But it needs not to discuss this or any other mattoia of detail, because it has been expressly and authoritatively slated that none of these points are considered in any way vital to the question which is now before England ami before the world. The vital principle now at stake is that of self-government for Ireland in local aifairs. Thii^was stated by Mr. Gladstone in his reply to the criticisms on the first reading of the Bill, and he has further and authoritatively declared it by his recent manifesto, which was transmitted to ua only yesterday. In that manifesto, he thus speaks : " As for the means we take the eatablishment in Dublin of a le^Bla- tive body, empowered to make laws for Iristi, aa coatra-distinguiahed from Imperial, affairs. It is with this that we are now bnsied, and not with details and particulars ; their time will come." He adds : " We are not debating the amount of Irish contribntions to the Empire, of the composition of the legialatire bodr, or the maintenance of representative connection with Westminster. On these oaestlons and many more we may and we may not be at odds, but what we are at this moment debating is the large and far larger question which includes, and I think absorbs, them all— the quention whether yon will or will not have regard to the prayer of Ireland for the management by herself of atfai.s specifically and exclnsirely her own. This and no other is the matter which the House of Oommons has at once to de«ide. If on t*vernment, whether npon that advice or not, have acted in accordance with the spirit of that advice, and that we are no longer called upon by any sense of duty, and it is unnecessary that we should tender them any advice ; what we are called upon now to do, under th3 prjsent circumstance, is to assist them, so far as we can. by f;,iving them our moral support in furtherance of the views which thev have expressed, and in the adoption of the prin- ciple of the Bcneme now before Parliament. The answers which have been given to the communications which have been received show their helpfulness. To the Speaker of the Quebec Assembly, in response to their resolution, Mr. Glad- stone Writes : " I am deeply eratefal at the resolutlou adopted bj yoar honorable body. It is my belief that the people of Bnglaad, who hare partial r^Bponsibility for the old miadeeds of the British QoTernment, and the Eeople of Ireland who have really uone, will eonoar in the wise and beral Tiew entertained by the Quebec AasemblT-" To the Mayor of Boston, in answer to the resolution of the city, he cabled : " I teel that American opinion, allied as it is with a regard and affection for the Old Oonntry, affordii Her Majesty'i Qorernment a powerful moral sapport" Then, shall we be slack to-day ? Shall we be silent now who spoke before 7 I say, no. We are bound to speak and to speak now. Else it will be said of us : " Tou spoke ere the question was ripe, when your words embarrassed ; now that it is near, even at the doors, you withhold your help." Else it will be inferred that we have changed our minds, and that no longer does the House of Commons approve of local self-government for Ireland. Our silence to-day will be as positively hurtful as our speech to-day would be help- ful. It was but yesterday that we were, in effect, appealed to. Listen to the words of Mr. Gladstone's manifesto. He appeals, indeed, directly, in the words which I am about to read, to the masses of the population of Groat Britain ; and this is what he says : "Watching from day to '^ay the movement of the carrenta of opinion daring the present conflict, more and mote I find it vital to observe the point at which the dividing lines are drawn on the side adverse to the (Government. They are fonnd, aa I sorrowfully admit, in proftise abund- ance, in station, title, wealth, social influence and the professions, and the large majority of them in the world, spirit and power of class. These are the main body of the opposing host. Nor is this all. As knights of old had squires, so in the great army of class each enrolled ■oldler has a roll of dependents. Toe adverse host, then, consists of class and dependents of class ; but this formidable army is the bnlk of its constituents, part of the same, though now enriched at our cost, with a valuable contingent of recruits that has fought In every Govern- ment the greatest political battles of the laat sixty years, and has been defeated. We have a great aim. For us now it is to restore rour par- liamentary efficiency, by dividing and by removing obstacles to its work, to treat the Irish question with due regard to its specialties, but with the aame thoroughness of method by which we have solved colon- ial problems, tliat fifty years back were hardly, if at all, less formidable. To give heed to the voice of the people speaking in tones of moderation, by liie mouth of the vast majority of those whom we ourselves have made its constitutional representatives, and thus to str-^ngthen and consolidate the Empire on the basil of mntual benefit and hearty loyalty." I ask whether we, too, though that appeal is not a direct appeal to us, we too, a democratic people, kinsmen of those he addresses, of that very mass of the population to which Mr. Gladstone speaks, shall not echo a'ld fhrther his appeal. He describes in the same manifesto the response from the world. Thus he speaks : " Never have I known an occasion when a parliamentuy event co rang through the world as the introduction of this Bill, under the auspices of 'be British Oovernment. From public meetings and fVom the highest authorities in the OoloDies, from capitals such aa Washing- ton, OincinDati, Buaton, Quebec, and from the remotest districta lying beyond the reach ot all ordinary political excitement, 1 receive the coe- cloaive aitnrance that kindred people regard it with warm and fraternal sympathy. Our present effort is to settle, on ac adequate scale, and once for all, the long-vexed and troubled relations between England and Ireland, which exhibit to us the one and only conspicuoua failure of the political genius of our race, to confront and master a difficulty, and to obtain in a reasonable degvee the main ends of ciTillsed life." I ask, under those circumstances, and when the highest tes- timony is given to those resolutions from various quarters, and their utility, shall Canada, who was earliest in the field, be dumb to-day ? Shall her voice, so loud before, be eilent now ? Shall we not listen to that mute appeal and cause our names to be enrolled amongst those who consti- tute the forces of tfie great public opinion throughout the world, giving an added impulse to the progress of this great measure ? I dare not be silent longer. I do not ring this as a party question. I have waited till the last moment, hoping that some one on the other side of the House would move. That hope I have been obliged to abandon. I see that the Minister of Inland Bevenue has declined to move, and has cabled for himself and for the Irish representatives in Parliament the assurance of his and their adhesion to the address of 1882. I do not undervalue hia assurance. But it is not the assurance required. What is required is the assurance, not of one, but of all claBses; not of a section, but of the people; not of a Min- ister of the Crown, but of the Commons of Canada ; not of the Irish Catholic members, but of the French and English, Scotch, Irish and German, of all creeds aud of all nationalities. To substitute the hon. gentleman's assurance for our voice would be to acknowledge that we do not choose now to speak in the sense in which we spoke then, and in which he declares hisonrn readiness to speak again, I there- fore speak, bat not as a Beformer, or as a party leader ; I speak as a Canadian and citizen of the Empire to brother Canadians and fellow-citizens of the Empire. This U not a Protestant or a Catholic question ; they are enemies of their country who would make it so. It should not be, in Canada at all events, a Conservative or a Beform measure. I regard those as the enemies of their country who would try to make it so. I hope that we may, by our own action this day, show jarselves united in the redress of wrongs and in the advancement of the cause of liberty. For my pari I should feel myself nothing less than a coward and a criminal should we, without any effort of mine, stand passive today and fail to lend our help at this critical moment to the cause ot freedom and local self-government lor the Irish people. I, therefore, move to leave out all the words after " that and insert the following :— An humble addreis be presented to Her Majesty to respectfully asf are Her Majesty that the Interest and concern felt by the (Emmons ot Ganadb, and the people Whom they represent, in the condition of Ireland, a>id their desire that some means may be found of meeting the expressed wishes of so mnny of Her Majesty's Irish subjects for the grant to Ireland of a measure of local self-government still continue as warm and earnest as In the year 1882, when they were humbly signified .0 Her Majesty by an address to the terms to which thia House affirms its abiding adhesion. Humbly to infotm Her Majesty that this House hails with joy the sabmisslon by Her Majesty' sOovernment to the Parliament of the United K'ngdom of a measure recogalllng the principle of local self-govern- ment for Ireland. " And humbly to ezp.'eas to Her Majesty the earnest hope of this House that the principle of the said measure may be atlirmed, and Ihat it may form the baaia for such a settlement of this great question aa ahoil eondaoe to the peace, happinest and prosperity of the Empire. FiiBted bj MaeLean, Bogar * 0*., ParliaoMntatjr Printera, WeUingtoa BtrMK OtUwa