IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 k 
 
 A 
 
 O 
 
 ^ S^>^, 
 
 /. 
 
 > 
 
 <^\:%' 
 
 sr A^ W^..< 
 
 < ^^ 
 
 f/. 
 
 /.A 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 If ilM IIM 
 
 •- Ih IIIII2.2 
 
 t 1^ 
 
 2.0 
 
 1.8 
 
 
 1.25 1.4 
 
 1.6 
 
 
 ^ 6" 
 
 
 ». 
 
 p^ 
 
 <^ 
 
 /a 
 
 
 ^/^^' 
 
 >:> 
 
 '-f 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 V 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^< 
 
 v^ 
 
 V 
 
 ■^ 
 
 O 
 
 
 33 WIST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY. 14580 
 
 (716) 873-4503 
 
CIHM/eCMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHiVI/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 Thei 
 to th 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features oi^ (his 
 copy which may be bibliographicaliy unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 El 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommag^e 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie et/ou pellicul^e 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gAographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre qua bleue ou noire) 
 
 I I Coloured plates artd/or illustrations/ 
 
 D 
 
 Planches et/ou iiiidstrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 RellA avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La re liure serrie peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion !• long do la marge int^rieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans la texto, 
 mais, lorsque cela Atait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas iti film^os. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires supplAmentairas: 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'll lui a iti possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-^tre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mithode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquto ci-dessous. 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 □ Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagies 
 
 r~n Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages restaur^es et/ou pellicul^es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxe< 
 Pages ddcolordes, tacheties ou piquAes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages ditachees 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Qualiti inigale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materii 
 Comprend du materiel suppl^mentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule idition disponible 
 
 rri Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 r~~] Pages detached/ 
 
 r~n Showthrough/ 
 
 r~n Quality of print varies/ 
 
 r~~| Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 r~n Only edition available/ 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totaiement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure. 
 etc.. ont M filmies A nouveau de facon i 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 The I 
 pouJ 
 offth 
 filmii 
 
 Origl 
 
 bogii 
 
 theli 
 
 sion, 
 
 othei 
 
 first 
 
 sion, 
 
 or ill( 
 
 The I 
 shall 
 TINl 
 whic 
 
 Mapt 
 diffai 
 entin 
 begii 
 right 
 requi 
 meXh 
 
 This item is filmed at tha reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ca document est film* au taux de riduction indiqu* ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 Douglas Library 
 Queen's University 
 
 L'exemplaire film* fut reproduit grAce h la 
 gintrositA de: 
 
 Douglas Library 
 Queen's University 
 
 The Images appearing here ere the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in Icaeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or Illustrated Impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or Illustrated Impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les images sulvantes ont AtA reprodultes avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition at 
 de la nattet4 de rexemplaire film*, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est ImprimAe sont fllmAs en commen^ant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernlAre pege qui comporte une emprelnte 
 d'impresslon ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont film6s en commenpent par la 
 premlAre page qui comporte une emprelnte 
 d'impresslon ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la derniire page qui comporte une telle 
 emprelnte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol ^»> (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol y (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles sulvants apparaltra sur la 
 dernlAre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbols — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 filmte A des taux de reduction diff Arents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un ssul clichA, 11 est filmA A partir 
 da i'angle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'Images nAcesselre. Les diagrammes sulvants 
 illustrant la mAthode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 S 
 
 e 
 

 Ummml 
 
 BY FEY. W. JACKSON. 
 Kingston, Ont. 
 
 In discussing a subject like the one an- 
 nounced for to-night I shall not confine 
 myself to any particular text, the subject 
 is too wide for that. Not for exposition, 
 therefure, but as a motto, we will take 
 the eleventh verso of the. fifth chapter of 
 the Epistle to the Romans, ''And nut only 
 so Ijut we joy in God through our Lord 
 J^isus Christ, by whom we have now re- 
 ceived the Atonement." 
 
 " Put ofi' thy shoes fr«m off thy feet, 
 for the place whereon thou standest is 
 holy ground" were the words spoken to 
 Moses on a memorable occasion when 
 he stood in the immediate presence of 
 Jehovah. We stand this evsning in the 
 presence of the grandest of ail achieve- 
 ments as well && the most important of 
 all truths. The atonement is the central 
 truth of Christianity — the pivot on 
 which it turns. Considered as a doctri- 
 nal system, the atonement is to Christian- 
 ity what the key-stone is to the arch — 
 the power which binds it together in one 
 solid and symmetrical whole. Consider- 
 ed as a life, the atonement is to Chris- 
 tianity what the heart is to the human 
 body — the fountain from whence it em- 
 anates and the motive power by which 
 it acts. 
 
 Important, however, as this doctrine is, 
 accurate conceptions of its nature are less 
 frequent than we suppose. What is the 
 Atonement ? is a question easier asked 
 than answered. I see with pain that 
 dreamy sentiment is to a large degree 
 supplanting clear thought on this most 
 vital (luostioii. It is present in the 
 minds of the masses as a dogma to bt be- 
 lieved in order to salvation, but there is 
 tittle emphasis laid upon it as a doctrine 
 founded on the fitness of things, and 
 there is little effort made to grasp the 
 
 pirnciples on which it is based or the 
 methods by which it seeks its ends. 
 This is equally a matter of solicitude and 
 regret. 
 
 I am aware that when man has done 
 his best there will be much in this doc- 
 trine that he does not and cannot under- 
 stand. What, then, because we cannot 
 reach the summit of this sunlit mountain, 
 are we to remain forever in the fogs of 
 indolent credulity ? No ! we are bound 
 by the facts of our nature to aim to have 
 intelligent reasons for our convictions and 
 acts. If I am to trust my interest for 
 time and eternity to the death of Christ, 
 the question arises in my soul and I can- 
 not crush it — Why ? 
 
 I do not mean that the ratiomde of the 
 atonement is necessary in order to salva- 
 tion. That would exclude the salvation of 
 infants, of idiots, and of all who have not 
 come under the direct influence of Chris- 
 tian teaching; a conclusion equally re- 
 pulsive to man as it is derogatory to the 
 character of God. A man maybe saved 
 by a simple reliance on the fact of the 
 atonement who is in utter igo ranee of 
 the reasons on which it rests. This arises 
 from the fact that the atonement is not 
 the reason for the sinner's faith, but for 
 the exercise of God's mercy in saving. 
 Notwithstanding all this, however, any 
 man who has any care to be an intelli- 
 gent Christian will, in the spirit of rever- 
 ence and humility, try to ascertain from 
 Scripture a solution of the questions 
 which arise in his own boaoni as he con- 
 templates the death of Christ. — Why? 
 How ? Wherefore ? These questions re- 
 • luire close, consecutive, protracted 
 thought, which God will reward by a 
 good degree of clearness and certainty. 
 
 I am aware that we are often told that 
 we must not theorize on this subject, but 
 accept the fact as revealed in Scripture. 
 
 i 
 
 m 
 
 I'll 
 
 (1 
 
 \2or\o^ 
 
In one respect this is sound advice, in 
 another it is most unwise. Tlic stero- 
 typed phraseology and the marbid senti- 
 mentality which previiils so extensively 
 on this subject i - neither more nor less 
 than a refuge front intellectual difficultii^s 
 •r an excuse for the lu-j^lcct of intellectual 
 effort. Besides it is simply impossible 
 to think about the atonement without 
 building up a theory. The moment you 
 begin to think about it that moment you 
 begin to theorize. It has been remarked 
 in relation to this subject that "to specu- 
 late is perilous ; not to speculate is more 
 perilous still." The vital issues which 
 hang up»n the atonement urges us to 
 some definite thought on the subject. It 
 is no curiosity that prompts our enquiries 
 but the awful problem of eternal life or 
 death as the destiny of our souls. I want 
 to aid you if I can to some definite ideas 
 on this subject. I am not going to dog- 
 matize but suggest. 
 
 1. First, then, 1 want you to notice 
 that the atonement is no after-thought in 
 the Divine Government. Infidel objec 
 tors have sometimes used the doctrine of 
 atonement as taught in Scripture as un 
 argumtut against the perfection of God. 
 Tbi* may have arisen from the careless 
 use of the word expedient when applied 
 to this supject. In the ordinary sense 
 of that term the atonement is no expe- 
 dient — no after-thought of the Divine 
 Governor of the world to meet an unfore- 
 saen exigency, but part of an eternal plan. 
 The purpose of redemption was an eter- 
 nal purpose. It in no way compromises 
 the perfection of its Divin« Author. The 
 creation of a free agent like man implied 
 the possibility •( sin, the Divine pres- 
 cience saw that man in the use of his free- 
 dom would sin — saw it long before man 
 was created, and in the infinite love of 
 His hearc God provided for the sinner's 
 salvation ere a single intelligent creature 
 had been called into being. The testi 
 mony of Scripture on this point is most 
 clear and incontrovertible. ''Christ is 
 the Lamb slain from the fonndation of the 
 world." He was "verily foreordained 
 before the foundation of the world ; but 
 was manifest in these Inst times for us." 
 So that we may safely adopt the language 
 of Joseph Cook and say "the plan of re- 
 demption is no insertion into the universe 
 to correct mistakes. It is a part of the 
 perfect purpose of Him who was, and is, 
 and is to come, who, in all eternities past 
 and in all eternities future will be faith- 
 
 ful to the plan which was, aiid is, and is 
 to come." 
 
 2. I want you to observe that the abso- 
 lute oneness of Christ ^s person is a most 
 important consideration in the construc- 
 tion of any theory of the atonement. The 
 separation in our thoughts between the 
 human and the Divine nature in the per- 
 son of our Lord has been a fruitful scmrce 
 of error. The*carefnl reader of the Scrip- 
 tures will have observed that the works 
 of Christ involved the possession of at- 
 tributes which belong to the Divine na- 
 ture and others which belong to human 
 nature, but the works are uniformly 
 predicated of the mie person. Take a 
 single illustration : it was the act of a 
 human friead to weep at the grave of 
 Lazarus. It was the exercise of a Divine 
 prerogative that raised hiru to life. 
 Both these acts, however, are ascribed 
 to the one person — the same Jesus with 
 the wet of human tears on His face and 
 crying "Lazarus come forth." The cus- 
 tom of drawing a line between the Divine 
 anal human nature of Christ so prevalent 
 in modern religious thought is utterly 
 unknown to Scripture. If we desire our 
 thoughts to harmonize with the Word of 
 God we must drop this distinction. His 
 work as the Redeemer did not in any in- 
 stance belong exclusively either to the 
 human or the Divine nature, but to the one 
 Divine-human person. I am well aware 
 that to the finite intellect this must ever 
 be a fathomless mystery. But the testi- 
 mony of the Bible to it as a fact is un- 
 mistakable. 
 
 And the two natures in the one person 
 have a profound significance in the work- 
 ing out of the scheme of human redemp- 
 tion. This mysterious union of the na- 
 tures in the person of our Lord provides 
 for the adequate representation of God to 
 man, and man to God. "A mediator is 
 net of one but of both." In Jesus Christ 
 we have a representation of the Deity 
 not only in the immensity of His love, 
 but in all the peerless grandeur of His 
 incommunicable perfections ; for in "Him 
 dwelt all the fulness of the Godhead 
 bodily." In Jesus Christ we have a per- 
 fect representation of man both as he ac- 
 tually i,s and as he ought to be. The 
 de2)th of man's prusent guilt is seen in the 
 humiliation and sufi'erings of Christ ; the 
 sublime possibilities of which man is 
 capable are seen in the perfect conformity 
 of the earthly lite of Christ to the eternal 
 law of righteousness. The Hypostatie 
 
3 
 
 1 is, and is 
 
 it the abso- 
 
 is a most 
 
 ! construc- 
 
 iment. Tlie 
 
 stween the 
 
 in the per- 
 
 itful source 
 
 F the Scrip- 
 
 the works 
 
 sion of at- 
 
 Divine na- 
 
 to human 
 
 uniformly 
 
 I. Take a 
 
 he act of a 
 
 e grave of 
 
 af a Divine 
 
 L to life. 
 
 i ascribed 
 
 Fesus with 
 
 face and 
 
 The cus- 
 
 the Divine 
 
 ) prevalent 
 
 is utterly 
 
 desire our 
 
 e Word of 
 
 tion. His 
 
 in any in- 
 
 icr to the 
 
 to the one 
 
 Tell aware 
 
 must ever 
 
 the testi- 
 
 fact is un- 
 
 )ne person 
 the work- 
 n redemp- 
 of the na- 
 1 i)rovide8 
 of God to 
 tediiitor is 
 ius Christ 
 ;hc Deity 
 
 His love, 
 iur of His 
 r in "Him 
 
 Godhead 
 ive a per- 
 
 as he ac- 
 3e. Th« 
 eun in the 
 irist ; the 
 t man is 
 [)nformity 
 ic eturnttl 
 
 ypostati* 
 
 union is no mere (l<)<rniii hut one of the 
 founiiiition stones of redemption — a nec- 
 essary truth and a prime factor in the 
 economy of grace. _ 
 
 3. The views we take of the nature of sin 
 and the penalties attached thereto will great- 
 ly modify our views of the atonement. Under- 
 rate the awfully significant fact of sin and 
 you will inevitably underrate the atone- 
 ment. The history of Chri-tian doctrine 
 proves nothing more clearly than as men 
 think lightly of sin they think lightly of 
 the method of its removal. At the root of 
 every theory that under-values the media- 
 torial work of Christ you will tiud that how- 
 ever melancholy its influence on man, sin, as 
 committed against God, is regarded as a 
 light thing. 
 
 So far as you contemplate the object of 
 the atonement you have on every theory the 
 fact of sin as its foundation principle. 
 What i» sin? "The transgression of the 
 law ? " Yes : and in that brief detinition 
 there is a universe of important truths. 
 There is implied the mor".l nature of man, 
 his relation to the Lawgiver, and the sanc- 
 tions attached to the law when promulgat- 
 ed. Into these we cannot now enter, though 
 they have an intimate connection with, and 
 an important bearing on the subject now be- 
 fore us. HutiKce it to say, then, that man 
 lifted his hand in defiance of the law under 
 which he was placed by the Creator. This 
 brings us to another important observation. 
 
 4. Law cannot be violated with impunity. 
 The law under which man was placed was 
 no arbitrary appointment of the Almighty, 
 but a transcript of His own righteousness, 
 founded upon the facts of man's nature and 
 the principles of the Divine Government. If 
 man violates the law the threatened punish- 
 ment must be iutiicted. God Himself has 
 no authority to remit the penalty. Why 
 was the penalty attached to the law when 
 it was promulgated ? Was it just that it 
 should be attached to the law at first ? Then 
 not to indict it in case ef transgression 
 would be manifestly unjust. However man 
 may vacilate God cannot say one thing and 
 mean another. What is punishment ? It 
 is necessary to overall our thinking on this 
 subject, in the strictest sense of the term 
 I underHtaud punishment to be suti'ering 
 
 plain or authoritative thau this that suffer- 
 ing inevitably follows the transgression of 
 law, physical or moral. 
 
 Many say that this is too severe ; which in 
 another way of saying that man is more 
 tender and compassionate than God, a 
 statement we shall do well to ponder 
 ere we accept. There is at work in secret a 
 morbid sentiment about the love of God 
 which saps the foundation on which the 
 whole scheme of salvation rests. Men mag- 
 nify the love of God into such proportions 
 that they forget that He has other attributes, 
 and they put the perfections of the Deity 
 into conflict with each other, and contradict 
 the plainest facts in the experience of His 
 creatures. God ia love, but it is a perver- 
 sion of that grand attribute to magnify it 
 until it obscures His wrath against sin. It 
 is high time the intelligence of Christendom 
 rose in one loud and solemn protest against 
 this one-eided view of the character of God. 
 Again I affirm He is a God of love, but he is 
 a God of justice too. Nowhere is this truth 
 seen as it is in the mediatorial work of His 
 Son. It is a lens in which these two attri- 
 butes are equally focalized. It proclaims as 
 nothing else does or can to the outermost 
 limits of God's domain that law cannot be 
 violated with impunity. Before sin can be 
 forgiven God must become man and endure 
 Himself the penalty our sin had deserved. 
 The cross is at once the exhibition and 
 triumph of Diviue love and Divine law. 
 This brings us to another thought. 
 
 5. In what respect did Christ bear the 
 penalty of man's sin ? or to state the same 
 idea in another form. What is the relation 
 of Christ, as Mediator, to the law which 
 man had broken? We afe overwhelmed at 
 the idea of the Divine-Human Christ being 
 punished for sin : but does not this arise 
 from our superficial views of sin and our im- 
 
 Eerfect conceptions of the majesty of that 
 >ivine law the sinner has broken ? If our 
 observations about law and penalty are 
 riglit there can be no forgiveness without an 
 atonement which squarely meets the penalty 
 pronounced upon the sinner . I hold that 
 Christ, our representative, has done this. 
 The penalty was death. It is declared 
 in Scripture that all men died in Him, "Be- 
 cause we thus judge if one died for all, then 
 
 
 inflicted for wrong-doing. It is not a pro- all died," not as in our own version, 
 
 ' " ' all dead. " Now, 
 
 ^ 
 
 / 
 
 cess amung at the retormation of the of- 
 fender but merited sull'ering on account of 
 transgression : neither is punLshnicnt an ex- 
 pedient to prevent future transgressions, but 
 an infliction for past sin demanded by the 
 law of righteousness : much less is it the ex- 
 pression of resentment in (k)d on account of 
 the insult offered to His person but beoause 
 of the transgressiim of tlie law of righteous- 
 ness of which He is the Administrator. No 
 fact in nature, no truth in theology is more 
 
 'Then were all dead." Now, in what 
 sense can it be said that all men died 
 in Him unless He were as truly the re- 
 presentative head of mankind as was Adam? 
 The idea of the Apostle is that Christ's death 
 in relation to the broken law was as if all 
 sinners had died. The Apostle states the 
 same idea in anotlier form in the last verse 
 of the same chapter: "He hath matle Him to 
 be sin for us who knew no sin that we might 
 be made the righteousness of God in Him." 
 
^J 
 
 / 
 
 How was Christ "made sin for ua?" Cer- 
 tainly not by actual transgression. The so- 
 lution of this question has sometimes been 
 sousht by rendering the phrase "made sin for 
 us" by "a sin-offering for us" a blessed Scrip- 
 ture truth, but it is inadmissible to attach that 
 idea to the phrase in this verse for the sim- 
 ple reason that it destroys the Apostles anti- 
 thesis. There is no sense in which you can 
 interpret this phrase in harmony with its 
 context which ao<is not regard Christ as the 
 voluntary vicarious representative of our 
 race. And as such God laid on Him the 
 awful judicial consequences of the sin of 
 mankind. Peter gives ns the same idea: 
 "Who his own self bore our sins in His own 
 body on the tree. " How did Christ bear sin? 
 He was not a sinner. He was never person- 
 ally displeasing to God, but as our represen- 
 tative he so bore the penalty of sin as to meet 
 the demands of the law on the original of- 
 fender. 
 
 There was no transfer of the sinners' guilt 
 to Christ in the sense of blameworthiness, 
 but if you use the word guilt to express a 
 liability to suffer for sin, then there was such 
 a transfer from man to Christ. This is the 
 very core of the teaching by which the work 
 of Christ was kept before the minds of the 
 Jewish Church. Under that dispensation 
 the offender was required to bring the ani- 
 mal appointed as the sacrifice for sin. His 
 appearance at the altar with the victim was 
 an acknowledgment that he was under obli- 
 gation to die for his sin. But the innocent 
 victim took the sinner's place, and its life 
 was taken instead of that of the sinner 
 himself. The animal was regarded as the re- 
 presentative of the wrong-doer. So Christ 
 as our representative bore the penal conse- 
 quences of sin instead of us. His death was 
 substituted for ours. He stood in our place 
 as transgressors of the eternal law of right- 
 eoi^sness. He represented us to God as the 
 Adininistrator of that law. His death, on 
 account of the infinite dignity of His person, 
 was accepted as answering all the claims of 
 justice, as maintaining unblemished the rec- 
 titude of the Divine government, while it 
 secured the exercise of mercy toward the 
 sinful. Christ did not die to induce God to 
 be merciful — that is a caricature of the 
 atonement and a blasphemy against God — 
 but to make the exercise of mercy consistent 
 with justice. "That He might be jmt (not 
 merciful) and the justifier of him which be- 
 lieveth in Jesus," is the Scripture way of 
 stating this truth. 
 
 Sometimes it is objected to the principle 
 that I have laid down concerning the re- 
 presentative character of Christ's sufferings 
 and death tliat it is flagrantly unjust for the 
 innocent to suffer for the guilty. This 
 objection comes from two different classes of 
 men ; those who ignore the truth of Christi- 
 anity altogether, and those who admitting 
 
 the truth of Christianity deny that the 
 sufferings and death of Christ are to be re- 
 garded as an atonement for sin. To reply to 
 the latter class first: Is it more unjust for 
 the innocent Christ to suffer instead of the 
 guilty than it is for Him to suffer as an ex- 
 ample to the guilty ? On the theory that the 
 sufferings of Christ are not to be regarded as 
 an atonement for sin — endured by "the just 
 for," or instead of "the unjust" — our faith 
 in the righteousness of God is sadly shaken. If 
 the unparalleled sufferings of the Son of God 
 were not necessary in order to hcmour the 
 law man h,'\d broken, then they were mani- 
 festly unjut.t; but if they were required of 
 Him as the sinner's representative, and He 
 assumed His representative character volun- 
 tarily, and had the right so to do, then tJie 
 injustice vanishes as the mist before tiie 
 morning's sun. And this is our answer to 
 the other class of objectors: the voluntary 
 character of the sufferings of Christ removes 
 everything like injustice. If Christ had not 
 been a voluntary victim He would never 
 have been a victim at all. There is a marvel- 
 lous difference between the imposition of the 
 penalty of the law upon an innocent bding, 
 and the voluntary aammption of that penalty 
 by the innocent party, especially when you 
 remember the absolute right Christ had to 
 dispose of his own life. It has been well re- 
 marked that "We may defy the human mind 
 to devise any other plan of jwirdon and salva- 
 tion which is not unworthy of God, nay, un- 
 worthy of man, and consequently ineffica- 
 cious and illusory." 
 
 6. But there is another aspect of the atone- 
 ment which we must consider. As the fed- 
 eral head and representative of mankintl 
 Christ met the requirements of the eternal 
 law of righteousness by enduring its penalty 
 in His own person, His own inhnite dignity 
 making His death a satisfaction for the sins 
 of all mankind. We have now to consider 
 Him as the representative of God to man. 
 Christ is as truly God as the Father. "In 
 Him dwelt all the fulness of the Godhead 
 bodily." But He took our nature into union 
 with the Divine that He might reveal the 
 Deity to humanity. A large number of texts 
 show this. "The W^ord was made flesh and 
 dwelt amongst, and we beheld His glory(the 
 glory as of the only begotten of the Father) 
 full of grace and tiuth." "No man hath 
 seen God at any time; the only begotten Son 
 which is in the bosom of the Father — He 
 hath declared him. " God does not send a 
 messenger to mankind; He comes Himself to 
 show us what He is in His relation to ua. 
 Man's heart yearned for this the wide world 
 over With the light men had concerning 
 («od before the advent of Christ they coultl 
 not be satisfied as to the dispositions the 
 Divine Being cherished towards them. 
 Philip's request, "Sliow us the Father and it 
 siifficoth us," was not a solitary instance 
 
 but 
 whi 
 tion 
 Chr 
 Byt 
 men 
 the 
 and 
 butt 
 tial, 
 here 
 of h 
 subl 
 prof 
 tion 
 a mi 
 late( 
 bnt 
 7. 
 men 
 ceiv 
 Chr 
 tary 
 beai 
 law 
 thuE 
 witl 
 the 
 feet 
 the 
 misc 
 man 
 had 
 Chri 
 God 
 augi 
 the I 
 the 
 thes 
 y, trim 
 ^// necc 
 gard 
 eoue 
 indi: 
 It i 
 
 gOV( 
 
 that 
 subj 
 it is 
 stiti 
 atot 
 8. 
 ai t 
 wht 
 An^ 
 fiiui 
 soni 
 errr 
 by: 
 are 
 cart 
 will 
 in 
 lik( 
 all 
 atri 
 
 ^l 
 
k'ere mani- 
 
 but the expressibn of a universal need 
 which is met in the mystery of the incarna- 
 tion and sacrifice of Christ. "God was in 
 Christ reconciling the world unto Himself. " 
 By this wondrous manifestation of the Deity 
 men see the unutterable love of His heart, 
 the unswerving rectitude of His government, 
 and the perfection and glory of all His attri- 
 butes. All other revelations of God are par- 
 tial, one-sided, and so far unsatisfactory ;but 
 here wg have the glory, majesty and might 
 of his nature manifested in connection with 
 sublime condescension, infinite love, and a 
 profound desire for the recovery and salva- 
 tion of a fallen race. In Christ we have such 
 a manifestation of God as is not only calcu- 
 lated to flood the understanding with light, 
 but mf^ethe heart and inspire us with hope. 
 
 7. If my hearers have followed the state- 
 ments which have been made they will per- 
 ceive that in one aspect the atonement is 
 Christ considered as the perfect and volun- 
 tary representative of sinful man to God, 
 bearing the penalties of His own immutable 
 law instead of the race that had sinned, 
 thus making the exercise of mercy possible 
 without givmg any countenance to sin. In 
 the other aspect the Atonement is the per- 
 fect representation of God to man made in 
 the person of Jesus Clirist, correcting all the 
 misconceptions of God which had beclouded 
 man's intellect and allaying all the fears that 
 had thrilled his heart with terror In Jesus 
 Christ He is no less the inflnite and holy 
 God, but he becomes the familiar God, the 
 august but intimate friend of mankind whom 
 the humble and the trustful learn to call by 
 the name of Father. Properly understood 
 these two ideas express the Scripture doc- 
 trine of Atonement. They recognize it as a 
 necessity in the Divine attributes, they re- 
 gard it as a vindication of the law of right- 
 eousness, and they exhibit it as a motive to 
 induce men to abandon sin and turn to God. 
 It is neither the substitutionary, nor the 
 governmental, nor the moral influence theory 
 that contains the whole truth on this vital 
 subject — each is true in its own sphere — but 
 it is the union of the three in ouh which con- 
 stitutes the complete Scriptural idea of 
 atonement. 
 
 8. This representative character of Christ 
 as the substitute for sinners is the touchstone 
 wherewith to test error on this vital subject. 
 Any tlieory which lacks this element is 
 faulty and unscriptural— unscriptural in the 
 sense of defect. During the past few years 
 errors on this subject have appeared which, 
 by reason of the nomenclature in which they 
 are stated, men suppose to be new. But the 
 careful student of the history of doctrine 
 will not fail to recognize them as old errors 
 in a new dress. The phraseology is more 
 liki! tiie truth than formerly, and they are 
 all the more dangerous for that; but when 
 stripped of their new trappings they appear 
 
 in all their old defoi-mity. There are many 
 shades of expression, but they all resolve 
 themselves into two fundamental ideas, they 
 «dl regard Christ aa an example or a teacher 
 m erely. 
 
 (1) Christ's work is regarded by some as 
 that of a mere exampler, not that of a 
 substitute. Robertson in his remarkable 
 sermon entitled "Caiaphas' view of vicarious 
 sacriflce," lays emphasis upon the vicarious 
 principle, but what does he mean when he 
 applies it to Christ's work ? To use his 
 own illustration, "Christ approached the 
 whirling wheel (of the world^ evil) and was 
 torn in pieces. " Why ? why ! according to 
 Robertson it was in order that we might 
 learn how to bear the tearing ourselves ; that 
 as we study Christ's life and death we might 
 admire and imitate His example. A beauti- 
 ful theory, and in one respect a blessed 
 truth, but when we are told that this was 
 the sole aim of Christ's mission to earth we 
 are compelled to demur. If Christ only came 
 into the world to show us the proper attitude 
 we should assume toward evil. He is not the 
 Christ of the New Testament writers. In 
 what way does Christ as an example meet 
 the demands of the law man has broken ? 
 In what way does such a theory provide for 
 the pardon of past sin ? This is the central 
 and radical defect of all theories which con- 
 template Christ as a mere example, and be- 
 fore we can accept any of them we must 
 have a new Bible, for the old book declares 
 that Christ is "the propitiation for our sins, 
 and not for ours only, but also for the sins 
 of the whole world. " 
 
 (3) Others tell us that Christ came as a 
 teacher of truth, a revealer of the mind and 
 heart of God toward humanity, this in it- 
 self is also a blessed fact, but when it is 
 claimed that this was the sole object of His 
 mission it becomes a mischevous and danger- 
 ous error, even though it should emphasize 
 His death as that of a martyr for the con- 
 firmation of the truths He had taught. 
 Several objections to this theory present 
 insuperable difficulties to my mind. 
 
 (a) It is anything but clear that the heroic 
 death of a martyr proves the truth of the 
 doctrine for which he dies ; if you admit 
 that, then you admit the truth of all religions, 
 for they have all had their martyrs. All that 
 can be fairly inferred from the death of any 
 martyr is that he firmly believes the truth 
 of the doctrine for which he dies, but it is 
 not and cannot be any evidence of its truth 
 to another. If the truth of Christ's doctrine 
 depended upon this fact its foundation 
 would be uncertain, and the hope of salvation 
 would be slender indeed. 
 
 (b) Another fatal objection to this theory 
 is that the doctrine of Christ was singularly 
 incomplete at the time of His death. He 
 declared that the Apostles themselves were 
 incapable of receiving it in all the breadth^of 
 
6 
 
 its significance. Did He not say just heffre 
 the crucifixion, "I have yet many things to 
 say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. " 
 If then it is contended that Christ's denth 
 was designed as the confirmation of the 
 doctrine He bad taught. His death would 
 only be the seal of what He had taught up 
 to that time, and we should be left in doubt 
 concerning its subsequent developement 
 through the medium of His servants. 
 
 (c) If the earthly mission of Christ was 
 that of a mere teacher, then it will de diffi- 
 cult to satisfy the mind that the means were 
 not disproportionate to the end. The in- 
 carnation of the Second Person of the Trinity 
 was an act of amazing condescension and 
 must have sought the accompliahment of 
 an oljject beyond the power of any creature. 
 No creature could make atonment for ain 
 but God has often employed even man for 
 the communication of truth. In the presence 
 of this theory the conclusion forces itself 
 upon us that God could have commissioned 
 one of our race for this work, and have given 
 him such credentials of authority as would 
 have placed his deliverances beyond the 
 possibility of (question. He had done this 
 already under the Old Dispensation, He did 
 it again in the case of the Apostles. If there 
 hatl been no higher object in the incarnation 
 of the Divine Son than that of a teacher, it 
 seems to me the end was unworthy of the 
 means, for the Divine Being might have made 
 known all His will through a luunan agent. 
 
 (d) If this theory of a Divine teacher be 
 the sole end of Christ's mission, then only 
 those who come into direct contact with the 
 truths He uttered can reap any advantage 
 from His incarnation. What becomes of all 
 who die in infancy ? Do they pass into eter- 
 nity unblessed by Christ's mission and work? 
 What became of the millions who lived on 
 the earth before Christ assutniid our nature 
 and taught among men ? Wliat becomes of 
 the millions who live and die in ignorance of 
 Christ's person as well as of what He taught? 
 It is not reciuisite to this argument that I 
 should here show how the death of Christ is 
 an incalculable ailvantage to every man that 
 comes into the world. I only wish to indi- 
 cate that if this theory of Christ's mission be 
 true no man can in aw// nnui be bonelited by 
 it who <loes not apprehend the truths He 
 tauglifc. So that this tlieory places itself in 
 the most direct antagonism to one of the 
 most indisputable doctrines of Scripture, 
 jiamely: the universality of the beuelits of 
 His death ? 
 
 (c) The central difficulty and the most 
 radical d«fect of this theory is precisely the 
 same as that which regards Christ as a mere 
 example: it uiakes no provision for tlio hon- 
 ouring of a broken hiw or for the pardon of 
 past sin. What permanent advantage <:aii it 
 be to a n)an to apprehend the truths Christ 
 taught, or to conform to the example Ho set 
 
 so long as there is the guilt of past sin rest- 
 ing on the soul? Tiiougli ('hrist was the 
 grandest of all teachers sent from God, if 
 you ignore His death as a propitiation for sin 
 you may accept eveiy truth He uttered, and 
 sincerely try to exhibit it in the life,and yet 
 I am bold to affirm, that truth will leave you 
 as it found you a violater of the eternal law 
 of righteousness with all its terrible penalties 
 in fml force against your soul. 
 
 9. It is sometimes asked if Christ made 
 atonement for the sins of the world how 
 comes it that somi men are never saved, and 
 how can they be piVished for sins for which 
 He made atonement ? This way of putting 
 this objection has perplexed some, but it 
 only needs a little close thought to detect 
 the fallacy hidden in its terms. We may 
 lay it down as an indisputable principle that 
 all moral agents have a period of probation. 
 Moral agency implies the power of choice. 
 The command by which Adam was tested 
 was a prohibition: "Thou shalt not eat of 
 it." His loyalty to God was tested by his 
 attitude toward that commandment. Though 
 we inherit a fallen nature in consequence of 
 our relation to Adam; yet, considered as 
 moral agents, the atoning work of Christ 
 places us in a position equal to that of Adam 
 in Eden. As moral agents we must be tried ^ 
 in some way; our loyalty to God is tested 
 by the command to "Believe on the Lord 
 Jesus Christ." Our destiny hangs xvaon our 
 obedience to this command as Adam s hung 
 upon the command not to take the fruit of 
 the tree of life. God said to our first parents 
 "Thou shalt not," and with equal authority 
 He says to us "Thou shalt," and all the tre- 
 mendous issues of life and death eternal hang 
 upon compliance in the one case as in the 
 other. Christ's atonement has made the for- 
 giveness of sin possible in the Divine econo- 
 my; but pardon cannot be forced upon any 
 man. His moral nature forbids that. Christ 
 in His representative character must be 
 chosen before the direct benefits of His me- 
 diation can be realized. If Christ's atone- 
 ment be rejected "there remaineth no more 
 sacrifice for sins;" and without a sacrifice the 
 penalty of the broken law is in full force 
 against the original offender. Nothing is 
 mor«! clearly taught in Scripture than that 
 men for whom Christ died may perish. It 
 follows, therefore, that if the atonement of 
 Christ is to be of any direct personal advan- 
 tage to us it must be believedwith the heart. 
 Tliere must be a personal acceptance of 
 Christ as our representative, or His work 
 cannot avail for us. This is the simple con- 
 dition on which infinite Wisdom and Love 
 has suspended the destiny of our race. The 
 atonement is not the payment of a debt; but 
 a scheme which makes the forgiveness of sin 
 consistent with the perfections of the Divine 
 attributes and the requirements of the law 
 of righteousness, which forgiveness is only 
 
available to the penitent aoul who turns from 
 Hin with abhorrence and with a personal 
 faith in Christ makes the benefits of the 
 atonement his own. 
 
 Thus the atonement presents us with the 
 highest possible motive for loyalty to God. 
 The man who can contemplate it without feel- 
 ing gratitude to God and fervent desire to 
 obey His commandments muut be destitute 
 of every tender sensibility which usually 
 moves a human heart. The end of all the 
 
 fathomless mystery of the incarnation and 
 sacrifice of the Son of God is to lead man 
 back in loving obedience to his rightful 
 Lord, and draw his soul into a blessed unity 
 with the Eternal Father of his spirit. So 
 that I may conclude in the forceful words of 
 Joseph Cook: "If the great things man wants 
 are riddance from the love of sin, and deliv- 
 erance from the guilt of sin, we can obtain 
 the first best, and the latter only, by looking 
 on the cross. " 
 
^ 
 
 
 T 
 
 
 (Jol. 
 
 \ 
 
 in Him 
 
 
 made 
 
 
 l)y Hin 
 
 
 ))y Hir 
 
 
 earth o 
 
 
 Nog 
 words 1 
 
 
 one of 
 
 
 fords tl 
 
 • 
 
 he was 
 
 
 powers 
 
 » 
 
 impulst 
 to olin^ 
 the doi 
 
 
 countrj 
 
 dowed 
 
 versed 
 
 . 
 
 ligiou, 
 
 
 his an 
 
 
 threate 
 
 
 fant Ch 
 
 
 man er 
 
 
 nature. 
 
 s 
 
 Beho 
 
 
 w rough 
 Ethiopi 
 
 
 ung(jvei 
 tender 
 
 
 lot iias 
 
 
 the sy 
 ]nankin 
 
 
 His V 
 
 
 eharact 
 
 
 with c 
 
 
 nient<i v 
 
 
 of lig}it 
 the hca 
 
 
 
 i:ouibin( 
 
 
 of Winn 
 
 
 wliininj. 
 nniHt he 
 
 
 tliat lie 
 
 
 of (jiod 
 
 
 or a Ch 
 
 X 
 
 The 
 
 
 from hi 
 
 
 aliUis ufi 
 
 
 impress 
 
 4 
 
 
ci 
 
 The Conservative Force of the Moral Universe. 
 
 Bv Rev. W. JACKSON. 
 
 (Jol. i. IP ''; . "It pleased the Father that 
 in Him should all fulness dwell; and having 
 made peace through the blood of His cross, 
 l)y Him to reconcile all things unto Himself; 
 )»y Him I saj', AvhetJier they be things In 
 earth or things in heaven." 
 
 No greater man than the author of these 
 words was ever born of woman. His life is 
 one of the profoundest studies history af- 
 fords the student. Before he was converted 
 lie was of a violent temper, and his depraved 
 powers were driven by a torrent of turbulent 
 impulses. His natural disposition led hini 
 to cling to the principles of the Pharisees, 
 the dominant sect of religionists among his 
 countrymen. He was cultured withal, en- 
 dowed with the gift of eloquence, and well 
 versed in the traditions of his sect. His re- 
 ligion, however, wjvs a destructive zeal, and 
 his anger-ticrceness. "He breathed out 
 threatening and slaughter" against the in- 
 fant Church of Jesus Christ. Such was this 
 man ere grace sanctilitd and directed his 
 nature. 
 
 Behold the change which grace hath 
 wrought ! The lion Las become a lamb, the 
 Ethiopian, whiter than snow. The hasty, 
 ungovernable Saul lias l)ecome the gentle and 
 tender I'aul. The harsh, cruel, fantical zea- 
 lot has become the humble disciplj of Jesus, 
 the sympathizing friend and brother of 
 mankind. 
 
 His witings are the retiection of his own 
 eharaetci. Hero we fnid severity blended 
 with c manly seriousness. Here are senti- 
 mentii v\ 'ch strike on the intellect like rays 
 of lig'tit, and aweakh of pathos which melts 
 tlie heart. Here is tlie strength of a giant 
 (MMubined with the sym^iathy and tenderness 
 of wonum, while tliore is an utter absence of 
 whining and cant, in tliese renuvrks you 
 nuist 1)ear in mind that 1 take it for granted 
 tliiit he was indebted to the grace and spirit 
 of (iod for all he was and did as an Apostle 
 Of a C'liristian. 
 
 'I'he (»«(■ thing whicli distinguished him 
 from his brethren, and tliat which best en- 
 iililes us to understand his life is the peculiar 
 impression the idea of a univorsal religion 
 
 made on his mind. This idea never so pro- 
 foundly engrossed any other human soul. In 
 his endeavours to make this idea a fact he 
 spent all bis transcendent gifts and graces. 
 Of course this idea was a revelation from 
 God, not the product of his own brain. It 
 was this idea that kindled bis enthusiasm, 
 nerved him with exhaustless energy, and 
 strengthened his fortitude and endurance. 
 This was the inspiration of all his travels, 
 sermons, and epistles. The world for Christ, 
 and Christ for the world was the ambition 
 which tired his great soul and kept it con- 
 tinually ablaze. 
 
 The letters he addressed to the churches 
 his energies had founded are monuments 
 alike of his greatnei s of intellect and heart. 
 Many of his wordo wing us away into the 
 mysteries of the Deity or sink us in the 
 depths of His unmeasurealde love. Some of 
 them take us back to the verge of creation, or 
 carry us down the cycles of the unseen and 
 unending future. This text we have to-night 
 is one of the profoundest utterances that 
 ever fell from his lips or leaped from his 
 pen. In its grasp of redemption, in its in- 
 fluence on the destiny of men and angels it 
 stands alone ; like the highest peak in a vast 
 range of mountains, its base is on the eartli, 
 its top is lost in the clouds of heaven. "Hav- 
 ing made peace through the blood of His 
 cross, by him to reconcile all things unto 
 liimself ; by him, I say, whether they bo 
 things in earth, or things in heaven." 
 
 These words contain much doctrinal instrue - 
 tion it will be impossible for us to consider 
 inasingledisjourse. For instance, underlying 
 these words - the very base on ^hich they 
 rest is the doctrine of the Incarnation. "A 
 doctrine which in its whole amount," as 
 Bishop Horsloy ronuirks, "is this : tliat one 
 of tlie three persons of the (iodhead was 
 was united to a man, that is, to a hunuvn 
 body and a human soul, in the person of 
 .Icsus, in order to expiate tlie gudt of the 
 whole hiumin race, bv the deatii of the man 
 so united to the IJoclhead. " Christ did not 
 cease to be what He before was, (iod with 
 Cod ; but ho became what Ho before was 
 
not, man with men. Jesus Christ was not 
 humanity tleitied, neither was He Deity 
 humanized ; but the Divine and the human 
 nature united to make ore person, as body 
 and soul are united to make one man. This 
 is a profound mystery we cannot fathom or 
 comprehend, }»ut the first truth in the econ- 
 omy of grace. 
 
 We have, also, a oomprehensivo statement 
 of the doctrine of atonement in this text. 
 This is the grandest work of God, revealing 
 Go<l to man, and man to himself as they are 
 revealed nov/here else. In the atonement 
 every attribute of the Deity combines to shed 
 a brightness overthe Divine character, which 
 exceeds all the glory of former manifesta- 
 tions as the light of the sun exceeds the 
 light of the glow-worm. It sheds the rays 
 of heaven upon the questions of sin and 
 misery, and throws over the darkness of 
 human destiny a flood of light. It shows us 
 how the Divine-human Christ — the incar- 
 nate God — became the sinners' substitute, 
 and by His death reconciled God to man 
 and man to (iod. .Upon the general doc- 
 trine of Atonement I spoke to you two 
 weeks ago, and I am not going to enlarge 
 upon that ^- ^ct of the question again to- 
 night. 
 
 The tex'. our attention to an aspect 
 
 of this suLj c ' 'lio^' is seldom discussed. 
 Christ is hero levea^eu to us not only as the 
 Incarnate Word i.nd Redeemer of man, but 
 also as the conservator of the moral uni- 
 verse. "And havin\| made peace through 
 the blood of the cross, by Him to reconcile 
 all things to Himself, by Him, I say, whether 
 theij he (hhiffs III eitrtli or fhhiijn in heareii." 
 Here j'ou perceive that the redemption of 
 man by Christ is predicated with being a 
 means of gocxl to the angels in heaven. 
 What is called "tlie moral influence" theory 
 of the atonement is a one-sided half-truth 
 when applied to fallen man; Init it is a bles- 
 sed whole-truth when applied to the unfallen 
 intelligences who surround God's thnme in 
 the heavenly world. 'IMiis I conceive to be 
 the drift of the AiKJstle's meaning when he 
 speaks of Christ's death reeoncilini,' the hea- 
 venly hosts to the Eternal Father. Recon- 
 ciling, not in the sense in which that term 
 is applied to man; but the bringing and 
 binding toj^'ethor in eternal harmony of these 
 holy intelligences by tlie study of this W(m- 
 drouH schemC; and tlie Divine cliaractcr as 
 seen therein. 
 
 Some may lui led to roganl these stato- 
 inent," as the hi)i;( uliitions of tli(! ])roa('hor 
 rather than tlie voice of (J'ld. To the law 
 and the testimony, if it be not the voice of 
 revelation rej-ct it at once. Tlicre is just 
 this I'emark to be made, we are indebted 
 solely to I'aul for what lijL,'lit we possess on 
 tliis subjt'ot. He alone was conmiissioned to 
 publish it to till' world. With the single 
 exception of the text, all lie lias given us on 
 
 this subject is found in the Epistle to the 
 Ephesians. Turii, then, to the first chapter 
 of that epistle and read with me beginning 
 at the seventh verse : "In whom we have 
 redemption through His blood the forgive- 
 ness of sins, according to the riches of Hi.s 
 grace; wherein hath abounded toward us in 
 all wisdom and prudence; having made 
 known unto us the mystery oL His will, ac- 
 cording to His good pleasure which He hath 
 purposed in Himself ; that in the dispensa- 
 tion of the fulness of times He might gather 
 together in one all things in Christ, both 
 which are in heaven and in earth, even in 
 Him." I cannot, as some, regard the Apos- 
 tles here as spejvking of the gathering of the 
 Jews and Gentiles into one Church. By "the 
 dispensation of the fulness of times," Paul 
 evidently means the outcome of all the dis- 
 pensation; and by "the things in heaven and 
 earth" he evidently means the different or- 
 ders of intelligent beings. 
 
 Turn now, if you will, to the third chap- 
 ter of the same epistle and begin to read at 
 the eighth verse : "Unto me who am less 
 than the least of all saints is this grace 
 given, that I should preach among the (J en- 
 tiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; afid 
 to make all men see whatds the felloM'ship 
 (or "dispensation," as it ought to be render- 
 ed) of the mystery, which from the begin- 
 ning of the world hath been hid in God, who 
 created all things by tiesus Christ; to the 
 intent that now unto the principalities and 
 powers in heavenly places, might be known 
 by the Church the manifold wisdom of (ilod, 
 according to the eternal purpose which He 
 purposed in Christ Jesus the Lord. "From 
 this passage it is evident that it was part of 
 the Divine plan in the redemT)tion of man 
 by Jesus Christ to impress tho minds of 
 angels with the excellency His character, 
 and in this way ensure their allegiance for 
 ever. 
 
 Look again at the text : "It pleased the 
 Father that in Him should all fulness dwell; 
 and having made peace through the blood of 
 His cross, by Him to reconcile all things 
 unto Himself ; by Him, I say, whether they 
 be things in earth or things in heavoii. 
 Piciigel regards this verse as though it refer- 
 red to the reconciliation of angels to men by 
 the death of Christ, aiigois Iteing (iod's 
 friends, were men s emiiiiies while he was 
 hostile to God. Hut tlie reconciliation of 
 which Vaul speaks is not of angels to man, 
 nor of man to angels; but ■of lioth to (iod. 
 As Alford remarks, "Sinful creatnui is re- 
 conciled to <i(id strii'tly /i// (^'hrist; sinless 
 creation is recoiiciled to God; liy a nearer 
 relation, and a liigher ulorilicatinn of Him" 
 -by the law ol' syin|iatliy ami love. 
 
 These are .ill the ]ia><sagi'S of Scripture 
 which treat of this swliject, and they teach 
 us just thin niucli: wiiile the angels, as lioly 
 beings, did not need the death of Christ as 
 
istle to the 
 irst chapter 
 e beginning 
 m we have 
 the forgive- 
 ;he8 of His 
 •ward us in 
 ving matle 
 [is will, ac- 
 ich He hath 
 ic ilispensa- 
 light gather 
 Jhrist, both 
 •th. even in 
 (l the Apos- 
 jring of the 
 A. By "the 
 imes," Paul 
 all the dis- 
 1 heaven and 
 different or- 
 
 third chap- 
 n to read at 
 ivho am less 
 1 this grace 
 ng the (len- 
 Christ; aftd 
 e fellowship 
 be render- 
 ti the begin- 
 in God, who 
 irist; to tlie 
 alities and 
 it be known 
 om of (lod, 
 which He 
 d. "From 
 was part of 
 ion of man 
 minds of 
 character, 
 legiance for 
 
 pleased the 
 
 !iies8 dwell; 
 
 tlio blood of 
 
 all tilings 
 
 licthor they 
 
 in lioavoii. 
 
 gli it refor- 
 
 s to uivn by 
 
 tciiig iiod'rt 
 
 lili) lie was 
 
 illation of 
 
 H to man, 
 
 th to <i(id, 
 
 ition iH vv- 
 
 rist; siidcsH 
 
 )V a nearer 
 
 lii of Him" 
 
 •vc. 
 
 f Scriptnri' 
 Ihcy teach 
 ^(•ln, as lioly 
 )f I'hriMt a« 
 
 an atonement for sin; nevertheless, the 
 fruits of His redemption tend to their bene- 
 fit. Gofl will, in the "dispensations of the 
 fulness of times," by the death of Christ, 
 gather into union and harmony all holij 
 beings whether angels or men, with Christ 
 as their Head and Lord. 
 
 The arguments for the universal restora- 
 tion of men to the favour of God based on 
 these passages are ruled out by the empha- 
 tic phraseology of each of the texts. It is 
 only of "things in heaven" and "things in 
 earth" of which the Apostle speaks. There 
 is no mention of hell here. True, Christ is 
 f^ord of all worlds; but when Scripture 
 speaks of His general kingship there is men- 
 tion made of the world of woe. True, that 
 "At the name of <lesus every knee shall bow, 
 of things in heaven, and things in earth,n7H/ 
 thhKjs under the earth." But there is a mar- 
 vellous difference between the mere acknow- 
 ledgment of Christ's universal sovereignty, 
 and loving sympathy with His person and 
 loyalty to His laws. This is just the differ- 
 ence between all holy intelligences, and the 
 rebellious part of God's creation. The 
 question of Universalism. in any of its var- 
 ied forms of development, finds no counten- 
 ance from these texts; and must, therefore, 
 be decided witWout any reference to these 
 particular Scriptures. What then, are the 
 lessons to be learned from this subject ? 
 
 1. First. That all moral heitn/n .stand in 
 peril Jram which the atonement of Christ, bfi 
 means of its eonxervatire forve will effectual- 
 hj protect all who hare /lasned their proha- 
 tionarji period in the lore if virtue and loi/al- 
 ty to (fOil. 
 
 We have two striking illustrations of the 
 fallability and peril of pure moral beings in 
 the case of angels and men. Among the 
 myriads of beings who surrounded the 
 heavenly throne, a, vast multitude were un- 
 faithful to their powers and privileges. For 
 these there is no redemption. (Will you 
 pardon me if I turn aside here for a moment. 
 I li.ave asked myself as no doubt you have 
 done "How is it that man was redeemed 
 while the angels wlio sinned wore not ?" I 
 have thought it might be because tlic angels 
 were each a .separate creation, while man- 
 kind sprang from a federal head.and tlu race 
 to which wo belong must therefore stand in 
 a somewhat different relation (!od and His 
 law to what the fallen angels do. Whetlier 
 this be the solution of the (luoation or not, 
 the fact itself is indisputable, and, from 
 what wo know of tlio character of God, we 
 are bound to cimcludc there was some just 
 and good reason for the differciu'o though at 
 present wo are not able to discern it. lint to 
 return.) The angels sinned against siicli 
 light and love, there is, for thcni, no possi- 
 bility of rccov(!ry. Their great gifts in- 
 creased tlieir resp(insil)iiity and their peril; 
 and now, in misery commensurate with 
 
 their crime, they await ' 'the vengeance of 
 eternal tire. " Adam the federal head and 
 representative of the human race fell from 
 the high position and the holy estate in 
 which his Mak«r placed him. 
 
 Absolute freedom from liability to fall be- 
 longs alone to God. Freedom of will is es- 
 sential, inherent in the nature of all moral 
 agents. To say that an agent is free is to 
 admit the fiombility of failure. Well has it 
 been said that "In finite beings freedom to 
 do right involves freedom to do wrong al- 
 ways and everywhere. " Do I then believe 
 that saints or angels in heaven may fall into 
 sin. I believe that they retain the /wxcvr to 
 sin, but sin is not so much a question of 
 ability as of will. What I think this sub- 
 ject teaches is this: Such will be the in- 
 fluence of redemption on the minds of the 
 angels and saved men that they will have no 
 will to sin. "The pure spirits who shall 
 have, through a sufficient probation, main- 
 tained their integrity and entered upon their 
 reward in the very ])resence of God, with all 
 about them and all within them mightily 
 tending to strengthen all goodness, shall be, 
 though not naturally, nor absolutely, yet in 
 fact and in effect, incapable of transgrcs- 
 8' " This leads us to another thought 
 suggested by this subject; 
 
 2. To areomplish this end the atonement (f 
 Christ contemphdes the ijatherin;/ tojether 
 into one kimjdom all holy intelliijences, 
 "Whether they be things in earth or things 
 in heaven. 
 
 All pure moral beuiga retain their freedom 
 in heaven, but the conservative intluence of 
 the death of Christ renders it not only pro- 
 bable but rertvin — that thej" will never exer- 
 cise it in the guilt and fidly of rebellion. 
 The angels are represented as diligent stu- 
 dents of the mystei'ies of redemption. They 
 have been Christ's chosen instruments in 
 working out His purposes in reference to 
 man. They are to be the companions of 
 redeemed men through the unending years. 
 Tlieir interest and service in connection 
 with human redemption acts with a gracious 
 redox iuHuence on their own destiny. 
 
 There aro two ways of jireventing the 
 comm asion of evil. I wisli, for instanci*, t<» 
 prevent a child learning to swear ; 1 cutout 
 liis tongue, or I destroy his power of hear 
 ing ; that is one way : or I instruct the child 
 in the folly and sin of such conduct, and set 
 b !f(U'e him tho example of my own life un 
 til this sin becomes an abomination unto 
 him. In other words I may pi'ivcnt sin liy 
 lessening tho power of a moral agsnt, or I 
 may do it by strengthening tlu! powers lie 
 has and fortifying his motiv(\s and 'ove of 
 virtiK!, tliat is aiiotlu'r and a bclttir way of 
 attaining tho same end. Tlirougliout etcr 
 nity good men and angels will retain all tho 
 powers they now [lossess, but such will be 
 the inlluonce of redemption on their niinils, 
 
4 
 
 as they sec it in all its depths and heights, 
 that sin will not only be distasteful but ut- 
 terly abhored. 
 
 Sin sent a shock through all the heavenly 
 intelligences working rum and death. The 
 transgression of the hierarchies of heaven 
 struck the first note of discord in the creation 
 of God. The obedient host stood in mute 
 amaze as they beheld their former compan- 
 ions hurled from heaven's height into the 
 dark abyss. When man the best and noblest 
 of all God's intelligent creatures followed in 
 the wake of "Wicked spirits in high places," 
 there was additional cause for alarm, as the 
 howl of sin's discordant notes reached the 
 battlements of heaven. 
 
 More strange to angels still would seem 
 the assumption of human nature by the Se- 
 cond Person of the (iodhead for the redemp- 
 tion of a guilty, rebel race. But when the 
 fulntsss of all the dispensations shall have 
 come ; when angels and men shall have been 
 drawn together by the magnetic power of the 
 cross; wlion ledemptini shall have fused all 
 God's obedient creatures into a white heat of 
 gratitude and love ; when all the depths of 
 the wisdom and goodness of God, as seen in 
 the (iospel, shall liave welded angels and men 
 togetiier in one h.armonious and happy 
 whole : such will he the views of God's char- 
 acter it will inspire that eternity will be 
 spent in tlie adoration of a Being so wise and 
 glorious, so just and good. 
 
 .'{. A thinl lesson suggested by this subject 
 is tliiit it Is ii, (jrcof rrlicf to unr reuMoii to he 
 able to scr that the liicamnttoH of the Son of 
 God tiiid till' iiiifdtJiomahlc mi/xtfi'if of the Di- 
 vhic Stirrifiri' had a, wiiln' hcojw than this lit- 
 t(<- iforftf and its t'rw inhahitants. 
 
 This earth is but a speck in creation. 
 Myriads of worlds lie hidden from our gaze 
 in tile depths of space. Reasoning from 
 anology, we may suppose that they are as 
 densely populated as our own. At any rate 
 wo have tlie authority of revelation for be- 
 lieving in the existence of a countless multi- 
 tude of angels. Now there are thoughtful 
 men who aie staggered by the amazing con- 
 descension of God in the redemption of our 
 world by tlie death of His Son,— at Heaven 
 emptying itself for such as ourselves. Of- 
 fered principally for man, as an atonement 
 only for man, the death of Christ is much 
 furtlior reaching in its results. By a reflex 
 inliuence it reaches all worWs, and is yet to 
 1)cc( me the ))ond and unifying power of all 
 holy intelligunoes. The Sim ot Righteous- 
 ncHH wliidi lias arisen on us with such heal- 
 ing in his wing, is to reach and lu-ighten 
 other worlds, and conserve and intensify the 
 happincHS and worsiiip of the sinless hosts of 
 heaven. 
 
 'I'lu! stray light which the text, and its 
 parallelH in tlm Kpistlo to the Ephesians, 
 throws on the results of Christ's mediation 
 reveals a i)readth and heigiit of glory trans- 
 
 VI 
 
 cending all our conceptions. We are apt to 
 look at all things in the light of our own 
 narrow sphere, and limit all results by the 
 bound of our own vision. Here we see that 
 the redemption of man by Jesus Christ is 
 only a part of a vast and glorious scheme 
 which shall ultimately reach and bless all 
 the obedient in (iod's cre.-ition. 
 
 These indirect l)eneHt8 of the atonement, 
 though they are but very imperfectly under- 
 stood are fitted, not only to enlarge our 
 minds, but to beneKt our hearts. Wliatever 
 draws us out of self, or the immediate sphere! 
 in which we move, helps to expand our con- 
 ceptions of (>od and widen our sympathy 
 with the other races His hands have made. 
 This subject presents the moral governments 
 of God as vast and complicated ; but at the 
 same time, Viy redemption. His purpose is to 
 reduce it to <me unitjuc and harmonious 
 whole, including "All things in heaven and 
 in earth." 
 
 All this is part of jm eternal place which 
 the Deity has been working out since first 
 His power was dis])layed in the creation of 
 intelligent creatures, namely : the conserva- 
 tion and unification of all holy things. The, 
 scheme of redempticni is the instrumentality 
 God employs in working out this benilicent 
 end. While the immediate and direct sub- 
 jects of redeeming grace are sinful men, it' 
 has a comprehensive though indirect bearing 
 on the whole universe. 
 
 It is designed to reconcile all things to 
 God and bring all holy intelligence under one 
 system of perfect order, harmony, and love. 
 When the years of old time shall have ex- 
 hausted themselves, and the cycles of eter- 
 nity shall begin, what a jubilee awaits the 
 sons of God ? Then .all sin shall be subdued, 
 and all incorrigable and impenitent sinners 
 shall be shut up where they can no longer 
 contaminate others with their vileness or 
 hatred of God. ThiniaW the great and true 
 from every age and every rank in creation 
 shall be gathered into one, and Christ shall 
 be "All in all to the glory of God the 
 Father." 
 
 4. Yet once more: This nnhjcrt u/x'ns oid 
 to onr I'icn' nonic Hatisfactonj notion <f what 
 till' saved arr to do in cti'mili/. 
 
 The popular notions of heaven are ex- 
 ceedingly defective, and e(iually unsatisfac- 
 tory. Who can persuade himself that intel- 
 ligent redeemed men can find eternal enjoy- 
 ment in the popular notions. of "crowns, " and 
 "palms," and "Hongs." Mind I do not un- 
 dervalue tlicHc Scripture terms. They have 
 a significance dear to the heart of every good 
 man. They stand for realities which ought 
 to make the soul tlirill with rapture. But 
 tliOHO figures do not by any means express 
 the whole of the heavoidy life or even the 
 chief part of it. 
 
 In one of the passsages (piotcd from the 
 Kpistlo to the Kphesians there is an cxpres- 
 
 / 
 
e are apt to 
 of our own 
 suits by tlie 
 ! we see tliat 
 lus Christ is 
 ious schemci 
 and liless all 
 
 e atonement, 
 
 fectly undev- 
 
 enlarge our 
 
 1. Whatever 
 
 ediate aphcr(! 
 
 >and our con - 
 
 mr aympatliy 
 
 a have made. 
 
 governments 
 
 ; but at tlie 
 
 purpose ia to 
 
 I harmonious 
 
 n heaven and 
 
 1 place which 
 )ut since first 
 tie creation of 
 the conserva- 
 things. Tlie 
 istrumentality 
 ;hia beniiiccut 
 id direct sub-_ 
 sinful men, it 
 direct bearing 
 
 sion which may help us to form some intel- 
 ligent idea on this subject. "To the intent 
 that now unto the principaUtka and power» In 
 /ifitrenlij plaren migh be known bp the Church 
 the manifold wisdom of God, accordimj to the 
 eternal purpose ivh'irh He hath purposed in 
 Christ Jeitutt our Lord." Here you parceive 
 that the redeemed Church is to be the eter- 
 nal manifestation and unfolding, to the heav- 
 enly host, of the wisdom of the Divine pur- 
 poses in the redemption ot man by Jesus 
 Christ. 
 
 1 have epokeu of the shock to the angels 
 caused by the introduction of sin into the 
 creation. Reasoning from what we know of 
 man, is it too much to say that the permis- 
 sion of evil was a sid)ject unfathomable even 
 to angel's minds, and if this is true of the 
 introduction of sin, what shall we sa}' of the 
 recf>very of man by the incarnation and death 
 of tlie Son of tiocl ? Remember the angels 
 witnessed the downfall of their companions 
 unfoUowed by the appointment of a redeem- 
 er, therefore, when they saw Heaven empty 
 itself for the redemption of man, is it too 
 much to affirm that it was matter of wonder 
 and amazement — had depths and heights 
 they could neither fathom nor scale. But 
 when "the fulness of the dispensation of 
 times shall come," when they shall behold 
 the outcome of the mediatorial scheme in the 
 glorified churcli; when they look back upon 
 
 the methods, and look around them at the 
 results they will be overwhelmed alike at the 
 wisdom and the love of God. 
 
 The multitudes of redeemed men are re- 
 
 f)re8ented in Scripture as "crying with a 
 oud voice, saying, Salvation unto our God 
 which sitteth npou the throne and unto the 
 Lamb. " The angels are represented as wit- 
 nes.sed of this and moved at the sight in res- 
 ponse they cry "Amen ; blessing, and glory, 
 and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, 
 and power, and might, be unto our God tor 
 ever and ever. Amen." Taking these 
 Scriptures as the basis are we not warranted 
 in affirming that the cliief employment of 
 heaven will consist in the study of the 
 Divine character as exhibited in redeemed 
 sinners. 
 
 Thus the redemption of man by Christ 
 secures the highest destiny of the creature, 
 the love and adorement of the Creator. 
 ' 'Unto the praise of the glory of His grace" 
 is to be the final outcome of the mediatorship 
 of Christ. The ultimate aim of human re- 
 demption is to tune the lips of angels and 
 sanctified men to the praise of God, — to till 
 every heart with love, and make the universe 
 echo with hallelujahs to Him who died on 
 the tree. May we be ready to participate in 
 the joy of that triumphant hour, by a hearty 
 acceptance of the benefits of Christ's media- 
 torial work. Amen. 
 
 all things to 
 nee under one 
 my, and love, 
 ihall have cx- 
 ycles of cter- 
 ee awaits the 
 1 be aubdued, 
 nitcnt ainnera 
 can no longer 
 vilenesa or 
 ;reat and true 
 in creation 
 Christ shall 
 of (lod the 
 
 K 
 
 jeet ojtens out 
 \otlun of ii'hnt 
 
 eaven are ex- 
 ly unaatisfac- 
 self that intel- 
 •tornal enjoy- 
 crown8,"and 
 I do not un- 
 They have 
 tf every good 
 which ought 
 rapture. Hut 
 means expn'ss 
 or even the 
 
 ;« 
 
 oted tVom the 
 ia an exprua-