^^1 
 
 ^, 
 
 ^ #^, 
 
 o^, %.^^^\% 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 €^0 
 
 €o 
 
 <i. 
 
 ts. 
 
 9/ 
 
 A 
 
 
 K*/ 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 
 M 
 1.8 
 
 • 
 
 1.25 
 
 1.4 1.6 
 
 — — 
 
 
 -< 6" 
 
 ► 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 n WEST MAiN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 

 K*/ 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may signifi'iantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ lu meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'ii lui a iti possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cat exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent oxiger une 
 modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquis ci-dessous. 
 
 I 
 it, 
 
 □ Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommag^e 
 
 □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie et/ou pelliculie 
 
 □ Coloured pages.' 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 □ Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaurdes et/ou pellicuJdes 
 
 □ Cover title missing/ 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 □ Coloured maps/ 
 Cartes giographiquas en couleur 
 
 □ Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 □ Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou iiEustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 
 □ Boun 
 Reli« 
 
 avec d'autres documents 
 
 r~^ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Iv^! Pages dicolories, tacheties ou piquees 
 
 □ Pages detached/ 
 Pages d^tachdes 
 
 r~~k^howthrough/ 
 \1l1 Transparence 
 
 □ Quality of print varies/ 
 Quality indgale de I'impression 
 
 □ includos supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel supplementaire 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La re liure serrde peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 dietorsion le long de la marge intdrieure 
 
 Blank le&ves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 U se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout^es 
 lors d'une rastauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas iti film^es. 
 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, ti&sues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6ti filmdes d nouveau de facon d 
 obtenir la meilleur? image possible. 
 
 D 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl^mentaires: 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmd au taux de reduction indiqud ci-desscus. 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 y 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed hsra has Le«n raproducad thanks 
 to tha ganarosity of: 
 
 Archives of Ontario 
 Toronto 
 
 Tha images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in iceeping with the 
 filming contract specificationa. 
 
 Criginai copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the bacx cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated imprea- 
 sion. and ending on the laat page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol —^(meaning "COIM- 
 TIIMUED"). or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever anpiies. 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc.. may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand comef . left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames aa 
 required. The following diagrama illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 L'axamplaira film^ fut reproduit grdce A la 
 qin^rosit^ da: 
 
 Archives of Ontario 
 Toronto 
 
 Lea images suivantas ont 6tA raproduites avec la 
 plus grand soin, compta tanu de la condition at 
 da la natteti de raxemplaira filmA, at an 
 conformitA avec lea conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Lea axemplairee originaux dont la couvertura en 
 papier est imprimte sont fiimis en commen^ant 
 par la premier plat at an tarminant soit par la 
 demiire page qui comporta una <«mpreinte 
 d'impresaion ou d'iilustration, soit par la second 
 plat, seion le eaa. Tous les autres sxemplaires 
 originaux sont film^s en commandant par la 
 pramiire page qui comporte une amprainte 
 dimpreasion ou d'illuatration at an tarminant par 
 la derniire page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un dee symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 dsmiire image de cheque microfiche, seion le 
 cas: le symbols — »> signifie "A SUIVRE". le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Les cartea. planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 filmte k des taux de rMuction diffdrents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre 
 reproduit en un seul cliche, il est film^ d partir 
 de Tangle sup^rieur gauche, de gauche i droite, 
 et de haut en bas. en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nicessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la m^thode. 
 
 1 2 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
•"^fe 
 
 V"-'. 
 
 I" <„ 
 
 t 
 
 (From the Canadian Monthly for Fehruartj, 1870.) 
 
 >' 
 
 A I'lJiA FOR Tllli MIIJTIA. 
 
 \1\ TWO MILITI.VMKN. 
 
 L-. 
 
 (< 
 
 <f^/^^^Ltr' 
 
 A S CaniKlians, we aro proud of our 
 --^-^ nationality. Oiiv atiun- pufrHf, 
 is not on the surface, and possilily le- 
 quires t]>e positive si'i.iulus of a 
 ' Trent Dilhculty,' or the negative in- 
 fluence of a Times article, hefore its 
 latent depths are stirred. Hut the 
 national feeling exists. We are justly 
 l)roud of our position as the' lirst 
 colony of the Empire, and of our com- 
 mercial rank among the nations of 
 the world. It is our hoast that we 
 have a commercial marine only sur- 
 passed in numhers and tonnage by 
 four of the leading nations of the 
 earth. We have a territory richer in 
 vegetable and mineral wealth, and 
 larger in area, than any of the king- 
 doms of Euro})e. We have a hardy 
 and intelligent population, and the 
 freest institutions on the face of the 
 globe. How should we maintain those 
 rights, protect our liberties, and retain 
 ouif possessions, w-ere Great Britain's 
 naval and military assistance withheld 
 or withdrawn ? We have no navy to 
 protect our ships : we have developed 
 no sufficient military organization to 
 
 Population 
 
 Area 
 
 Revenue . . 
 Expenditure 
 
 for military 
 
 purposes 
 Army 
 
 ^} 
 
 Navy 
 
 (Sliips ., 
 
 -, (ilUlS . 
 
 ( Mou . . . . 
 
 stand tlic crucial tcstof war ; we have 
 no uianufiu-torics foi-warlikc mati rial, 
 and no internal resources for their iui- 
 niodiate creation; We have not even 
 arms and amniunition enough to suj)- 
 ply a single army corps in the lield 
 and to organize its reserve, should hos- 
 tilities comnu'nc(mow. Nothing could 
 be done, therefore, without iJritaui's 
 aid, save to submit peacefully to the 
 tiivst power that attempted forcible 
 annexation. 
 
 Now, is this a condition that should 
 bcawjuie.sced in by a free people, ac- 
 customed to the exercise of the fullest 
 civil and religious liberty i The mer- 
 chant who will not insure his life 
 against accident, or his proi)erty 
 against fire, is blameworthy, should 
 he suffer loss by these means. The 
 nation which declines or neglects to 
 protect its liberties in not providing 
 for its defence by all means within its 
 power, is equally reprehensible. 
 
 Contrast our position with that 
 of some of the smaller European 
 Powers : — 
 
 Dominion of 
 Canada. 
 
 Militia 
 
 3,727,000 
 
 3,580,;ilO sq.m. 
 
 ii4,5OO,000 
 
 £^00,000 
 
 none 
 
 IIDIU' 
 
 43,729 
 
 Ncther- 
 laniU. 
 
 3,«)7,263 
 
 13,fi80 .sq. ni. 
 
 i;S,U42,550 
 
 £l..''>4],!)i)!) 
 
 01,947 men 
 
 (i7 
 7o:< 
 '.»,2U0mBn 
 
 100,323 men 
 
 Switzerland. 
 
 2,66!),147 
 
 15,991 .s(i. ni. 
 
 £1,580,040 
 
 £586,237 
 
 84,369 ) 
 *50,069 i" 
 
 05,981 
 
 * Reserve. 
 
 Sweden. 
 
 Norway. 
 
 4,383,291 1,817,237 
 171,750s().m. 122,280sq.ni. 
 £4,;J40,000 £2,177,200 
 
 £925,000 
 
 7,88§ 
 fi 
 
 Mi 
 
 4,093 
 
 ( 29.1)40"" 
 
 { 94,9,")0 
 
 (13,166 
 
 12,7.50 peace 
 18,000 war 
 20 
 150 
 2,393 
 
 02,000* 
 
 3 classes. * Reserve. 
 
 Denmark. 
 
 1,910,400 
 
 15,,')04s(i.ra 
 
 £2,.'j84,000 
 
 £1,114,000 
 
 37,000 
 
 33 
 
 291 
 
 1,125 
 
 32,393 
 
 Greece. 
 
 I,457,8fl4 
 
 19,941 sq. m. 
 
 £1,380,971 
 
 ii336,757 
 
 I4,0(U 
 
 14 
 
 053 
 
 24,000 
 
 \ 
 
^^ 
 
 ^v^ 
 
 A PLEA FOR THE MILITIA. 
 
 -'^' 
 
 B'roni tlieso figures it. apiieuis that, 
 with a popuhition almost cinial, and a 
 revenue half as large as the Nether- 
 lands, we Hi)end less than one-seventh 
 as much for military and naval pur- 
 poses, and train for such services less 
 than one-fourth the number of men. 
 We have no ships of war ; she has 
 sixty-seven, some of lirst-class power ; 
 and yet her mercantile marine only 
 numbers 1,835 vessels, of 526,527 
 tonnage, while we have 6,952 vessels, 
 of 1,205,565 tons burden ! Denmark, 
 with about half our poi)ulation and 
 revenue, trains annually double the 
 number of men that we do, and has a 
 small and well appointed navy. 
 
 Another striking comparison may 
 be made in the amount paid for mili- 
 tary purpose per head of population 
 annually in different countries. For 
 example, in Great Britain the people 
 are taxed |6.8e per head per annum, 
 in France $4.50 per head, in Prussia 
 $2.20 per head, and in the United 
 States (exclusive of the cost of the 
 State Militia) $1.39 per head, while in 
 Canada we only burden ourselves with 
 the trifling tax of 14 cents per head 
 of our population for militia i)urposes. 
 Certainly no Canadian would object to 
 that tax being doubled or quadrupled. 
 
 It is not necessary to force these 
 comparisons to an application. There 
 are many circumstances which prevent 
 a comparison with the states of Eu- 
 rope. It is merely to point the fact, 
 that other nations having small popu- 
 lations and resources, do more to en- 
 sure their national rights and liberties 
 than we do. And it is beyond the 
 power of the most prophetic soul to 
 say that our rights and liberties may 
 not be invaded. 
 
 The question is, how are our means 
 of defence to be developed at the least 
 cost to a young and struggling people, 
 both in the matter of money, and of 
 time 1 There is only one way by which 
 a defensive organization can be main- 
 tained, adequately and inexpensively, 
 and that is by means of a militia. 
 But many of our fellow-citizens are 
 
 accustomed to ask the (juestion, ' Why 
 expend money to support a militia 
 that in peace is not required, and in 
 war would be inadequate as a protec- 
 tion against invasion 1 ' Let our his- 
 tory answer this (juestion. 
 
 Barely twelve yiiars after the strug- 
 gle which terminated in the cession of 
 Canada to the British, the arms of the 
 rebellious American colonies were di- 
 rected against C.mada. At that time 
 there were only about 500 British 
 troops in the colony, but General 
 Carleton embodied some 1,800 militia 
 and garrisoned Quebec, defeating the 
 attempt of the enemy to carry the 
 fortress by storm on the 30th Decem- 
 ber, 1775, and holding it until the ar- 
 rival of British reinforcements on the 
 6th May, 1776. All the country, 
 west of Quebec, had been overrun by 
 the Americans, and had not the mili- 
 tia proved loyal, in spite of the temp- 
 tations oflPered them by the various 
 proclamations of the American Gene- 
 rals, it is probable that, at the present 
 time, Canada would have been one of 
 the States cf th^' TTnion. This time, 
 therefore, the f .dy valour and loy- 
 alty of the Canadian militia, preserved 
 Canada to the British Crown. 
 
 In 1812 the Americans attacked 
 Canada with two corps, numbering 
 13,300 men. The British troops in 
 the Province were but 4,500 strong, 
 nearly 3,000 of whom were in garri- 
 son at Quebec and Montreal, only 
 1,500 being in Upper Ca^-iada. From 
 the capture of MichilimacinRC, the 
 first blow of the campaign, down to its 
 close, the militia took their share in 
 every military operation. Of the force 
 that captured Detroit with its garri- 
 son of 2,500 men, sfiarcely 300 were 
 regular troops. Brock had but 1,200 
 men to oppose 6,300 Americans on the 
 Niagai'a frontier, and more than half 
 were militia ; yet he confronted the 
 enemy, and in the gallant action in 
 which he lost his life, left an imperish- 
 able record of the steady valour with 
 which Canadians can defend their 
 country. At that time the population 
 
^T7 
 
 ■^^^^5rP 
 
 A PLEA FOR THE MILITIA 
 
 of Upper Canada, capable of bearing 
 arms, did not exceed 10,000 men, yet 
 the Province supplied ^^,\T^tt otttcei-s 
 and men as its contingent for service 
 during the war. 
 
 In 1813, Canada was menaced by 
 three separate armies, nuniliering over 
 30,000 men. The British force con- 
 sisted of 13,000 regulars, and 15,000 
 militia, scattered over a frontier a 
 thousand miles long. The Americans 
 overran Upper Canada for a while, 
 but by the end of the campaign had 
 been driven across the border. At 
 Chateauguay, Col. de Salaberry showed 
 of what stuff our militia was made. 
 The American force consisted of 7,000 
 infantry, 10 guns, and 250 cavalry. 
 The Canadian force, under de Sala- 
 berry, was about 1 ,000 .strong — nearly 
 half of whom took no part in the bat- 
 tle — and yet he totally defeated and 
 drove back a force eight times his 
 strength. Of this action, General 
 Sir James Carmichael Smyth says: 
 ' The aflfair upon the Chateauguay Eiver 
 is remarkable as having been fought, 
 on the British side, almost entirely by 
 Canadians. The Republicans were 
 repulsed by a very inferior number of 
 Canadian militia, and of troops raised 
 in Canada, thus affording a practical 
 proof of the good disposition of the 
 Canadians, and the possibility, to say 
 nothing of the policy, of improving 
 the Canadian militia, so as to be fully 
 equal in discipline and instruction to 
 any American troops that may be 
 brought against them at any future 
 opportunity.' He also says, ' Not a 
 single Canadian militiaman was known 
 to desert to the enemy, during the 
 three years the war continued.' At 
 the end of the war, the Americans had 
 gained no foothold upon Canadian 
 territory, and were forced to postpone 
 that concpiest of Canada, originally 
 undertaken as ' a militaiy promenade. ' 
 Yet at that time the entire population 
 of Canada did not exceed 300,000, 
 while that of the United States was 
 8,000,000,— an odds of 27 to 1 
 us. For the second time, 
 
 over 
 
 against 
 
 therefore, the efforts of the Canadian 
 militia laigrly contributed to th(^ pre- 
 servation of Canada to the Crown. 
 
 During 1837, in Upi)er Canada 
 alone, with a population of 450,000, 
 there were 40,000 militia enrolled, in 
 the expectation of a war being ]»ro- 
 voked by the action of the too active 
 sympathisers with the Rebels. Of 
 this number there were 1(! battalions 
 and 35 companies of cavalry, artillery, 
 and riHemen, placed on active service, 
 several of whom did military duty for 
 some years afterward. 
 
 In 1862, when the ' Trent dithculty ' 
 rendered a war with the United States 
 a matter of extreme probability, the 
 alacrity with which the Canadian mi- 
 litia sprung to arms, resolving to abide 
 by all consequences rather than that 
 their dearly loved flag should be in- 
 sulted with impunity, no doubt had 
 its influence in securing the submis- 
 sion and apology that was made by 
 the American Government. 
 
 In 1865, it became necessary, in 
 order to restrain tl e Southerners re- 
 sident in Canada from making our 
 territory a basis for warlike operations, 
 to place corps of observation at cer- 
 tain points on the frontier. These 
 battalions were formed from the elite 
 of our militia and they became, after 
 a few months' duty, equal to any sol- 
 diery in the world. How could we 
 at that time have sustained our Inter- 
 national obligations, had we no mili- 
 tia ? 
 
 From 1866 to 1870 came the Fenian 
 raids. How serious would these small 
 matters have become had we not had 
 our militia leady to repel such attacks ! 
 Those who now cavil at the expense, 
 and argue against the necessity of the 
 Force, were in those days the first to 
 recognize their usefulness, and to seek 
 to place the militia between them- 
 selves and the enemy. In twenty-four 
 hours fro; II the call for active service, 
 33,751 militiamen had como forward, 
 upwards of 8,000 in excess of the 
 quota allowed by the Militia Act, and 
 13,000 more than had been on the 
 
 'I 
 
mr 
 
 7T 
 
 "•— V 
 
 A PLEA FOR THE MILITIA. 
 
 strength of companies in tlie preced- 
 ing year. 
 
 In 18G9, our niilitiii took a part in 
 the exp(>(lition to Ked River, and, hy 
 their soldierlike qualities and cheerful 
 endui'ance, won sucji high considera- 
 tion from tlieii- gallant connnander 
 that in the wilds of Ashanti he; wished 
 for those two corps of Canadian mili- 
 tiamen, wIksu the picked regiments of 
 Imperial troops were at his disposal. 
 
 Since 1870, have not the (ruihord 
 riots and the 12th of July outrages in 
 Montn-al ; the Grand Trunk riot at 
 Belleville and elsewhere on the lino ; 
 the pilgrimage riots in Toronto, and 
 half a dozen other occasions in which 
 military aid has been invoked to en- 
 force the civil power, proved sulh- 
 ciently th(! imperative neces.iiity for 
 the maintenance in our mid.st of a 
 body of armed and disci[)lined mili- 
 tia, who regard their duty as soldiei-s 
 first, and their prejudices and feelings 
 last ? 
 
 Suppose that we take it for granted 
 that a militia is a m^cessary adjunct 
 to Government, even in a country 
 where the people have an hereditary 
 respect for the majesty of the law. 
 Upcn what principle, and what de- 
 tail, shall we render that constitu- 
 tional force at once iiiex}>onsive and 
 efficient 'I There are three ways af- 
 forded us by ^ ■ cedent. First, the 
 old feudal system, making the land, 
 through its owners, .vesponsible for 
 the forthcoming of a certain force. 
 This was the system in Canada prior 
 to the conquest, and which, singidarly 
 enough, was engrafted upon JBritisli 
 law by the Quebec Act. Sticond — the 
 ballof, which is the law of this coun- 
 try, though suspended in its opera- 
 tion by the pi'esent .system of volun- 
 tary enlistment. 
 
 The nearest approach to our system 
 as defined by law, is that in force in 
 Deiini irk, which is based upon the 
 liability of all able-bodied men to 
 serve, but adopts the l)allot as a prac 
 tice, 
 and results. 
 
 Let us glance at its woriang 
 
 I'^very male subj(.ct, at the age of 
 22, has to a.s.semble in his military 
 <listi'ict for the purpo.se of conscrip- 
 tion. They are then sorted for the 
 various arms — the smallest or weake.st 
 never being called ujjon for duty in 
 time of peace, and th<( physically in- 
 capable being rejected altogc^ther. 
 Aljotit to per company are selected 
 for active service, and are, to all in- 
 tents and purposes, regular soldiers 
 for sixteen months, and after that 
 time are incoi-poi-ated with those men 
 of their year, not called upon for ser- 
 vice, as a rcservr, to be called upon in 
 i-ase of need. These reserves are 
 formed into battalions, of which it 
 will be seen forty per cent are drilled 
 men. When a man has been in the 
 reserve for ten years, he goes into the 
 sacond reserve, and is not called upon for 
 duty, unless the first reserve is drained 
 b r war. Oliicers obtain connnissions 
 only upon examination, and are pro- 
 moted by seniority,— promotions in 
 the Artillery and Engineers being 
 based upon the number of marks 
 gained by those who are entitled to 
 compete, and a])pointments being 
 made to the Staff" from those who pass 
 the best examinations. In some cases, 
 however, these i)romotions are made 
 by merit. Non-commissioned officers 
 above the rank of coi-porals enlist for 
 eight years, after which time they are 
 entirely exempt from military service. 
 Corporals are selected from among the 
 recruits of the year, and are kept on 
 duty for two years, by which time the 
 new non-commissioned officers are fair- 
 ly able for duty. 
 
 The Danish army is composed of : 
 Cavalry— 1 Regiment Life Guards. 
 ]| 1 " Hus.sar.s. 
 
 ■t " Dragoons. 
 Artillery— 30 Batteries (8 guns each.) 
 Kngineers— 18 Companies. 
 Infantry— 1 Battalion Life Guai'ds. 
 22 Battalions (4 Compan 
 ies each.) 
 Or a total of 37,000 of all ranks. 
 The third system is that wherein the 
 
 
''^ T 
 
 / 
 
 A PLEA FOR THE MILITIA. 
 
 
 entire male population takes it in turn 
 to serve, as in Swit/orland, a country 
 which has for centuries pr(!sentetl the 
 edifyinj,' spectacle of a nation deter- 
 mined to be independent, butiuiver to 
 interfere with its nei;^hliours — an ex- 
 anijile it would bo well for us to fol- 
 low. 
 
 With (!xc«![)tion of the clergy and 
 certain civil functionaries, every Swiss 
 is a soldier. From the age of It) to 
 that of -1-1 he may be at any time 
 called upon for military service. But 
 practically a man passes into the re- 
 serve or Lnndwchr, at about 28 to 30, 
 serving his time in the ilitc or first 
 line, before that age. As soon as a 
 youth attains the age of 1 9 la; is at- 
 tached to a battalion in his canton and 
 there undergoes 2S days' drill for tlie 
 first year, and eight days' drill in the 
 succeeding years. If he is suitable ho 
 is ])laced in the engineers or artillery, 
 and then undergoes 42 days' training 
 for the first and 1 4 days in the suc- 
 cteding years. Kiflenien ai-e trained 
 for 35 days the first, and 14 the follow- 
 ing years. 
 
 Staff officers are obliged to pass 
 through the military school at Tiuin, 
 as are also the ollicers of engineers and 
 artillery. Regimental staff oliic(;rs 
 also ])ass examinations on promotion. 
 The nnlitary college at Tliun is self- 
 sustaining. 
 
 'Dm elite or first line, numbers 84,- 
 369 of all ranks, thi^ irsc.rce or second 
 line 50,009, of all ranks, and the 
 Landwehr or third line, 05,981 of all 
 ranks ; the first two (in roiuid num- 
 bers 140,000 men) being armed and 
 equipped. 
 
 Thus we see what can be accom- 
 plished in the way of defensive organi- 
 zation, by smaller nations, with lesser 
 revenues than our own. What are 
 we to do towards the same end'j No 
 hurried extension of our present sys- 
 tem is necessary or would be prudent. 
 Armies are not made in a day, nor can 
 a militarysystem be perfected in ayear. 
 But the jruiae work must be built in. time 
 of j)eac6,nj)oii such solid fomdations that 
 
 it will neither shrinJi- nor yive w<iy Jinder 
 the presnure of wur. Therefore w(! ap- 
 peal to our legislators, and to our 
 countrymen at large, to give the mat- 
 ter serious and instant consideration. 
 To have an etHcient militia, sullicient 
 funds must be provided to carry on 
 the work regularly. It M'ill not do to 
 spend two nullions in one year, and 
 half a million in I'iie next. The vote 
 should be a standing sum, and not 
 subject to legislative caprice, or chec^se- 
 paring administration. Let the coun- 
 try decide, once for all, what it can 
 afford to spend annually for defensive 
 purposes, and then hold tho.se ])ersons 
 resi)onsible for its proper exi)enditure, 
 who are also responsll)l(! for the 
 etllciency of the Force. 
 
 It is dillicult to understand on what 
 grounds the successive Governments 
 have be(!U so parsimonious in reference 
 to militia expenditure. There is no 
 item in the Public Accounts less 
 grudged l.y the uuisses of the people 
 than that devoted to the support of the 
 militia ; there is no outlay that is dis- 
 trii)uted so evenly over the country — 
 and there is little doubt but that any 
 (iovernment would be liberally su|)- 
 ported in a generous policy towards 
 tiie force. 
 
 Members of Parliament have said 
 that the country would not submit 
 to an increased expenditure for mili- 
 tia j)urpose.s. This is either found- 
 ed on ignorance of the real feelings of 
 the Canadian jieople, or is but a shal- 
 low pretence. Ha;ve we not seen year 
 after year Muni^'ipal Councils all over 
 the country voting large sums to their 
 local volunteer corps to su|)plement 
 the Government Grants'? Do not the 
 Municipalities meet the Government 
 half way and build hand.sonie drill 
 sheds, of which they pay a large por- 
 tion of the cost ? The municipal bodies 
 are not bound to expend these sums, 
 it is no part of their duty any more 
 than that theyshould give grantsto the 
 customs and the post ofHce, or for the 
 erection of light-houses. This liberal- 
 ity is the most conclusive proof that 
 
\ 
 
 6 
 
 A PLEA FOR THE MILITIA. 
 
 the people are oven more adviuictjl 
 tlian their ruhu's, and that they tVel 
 that ParliauK'iit and Government do 
 not do thoir full d.:ty in reference to 
 the dofoiisivo organization of th(^ 
 Stat(!. It is absurd for oui' legislators 
 to excuse thoniHelvos from not voting 
 sufficient ruuis t^) the militia, on the 
 ground tliut pojjular feeling in against 
 it. There is no doubt that the people 
 will stand by the Parliamtfiit in any 
 steps taken in this direction. 
 
 The drill pay given to the militia 
 finds its way into every nook of the 
 Dominion DU almost every conces- 
 sion and side line can be found one or 
 MU)re members of the force — ^whilo 
 every town and almost every village 
 is the heachpiarters of a company, in 
 which the iidiabitants take a deep in- 
 terest, of whose appearance they are 
 l)roud, and in which their finest young 
 men are enrolled. Our politicians 
 have never yet fully aj)preciated how 
 deep a hold the militia organization 
 has taken ujjon the hearts of the 
 people of this country. It is the most 
 popular organization, and it has thead- 
 vantage of being neither religious, sec- 
 tarian or iiolitical, but purely national 
 and patriotic. It is the only common 
 ground upon which all can unite — 
 where Catholic and Protestant, Con- 
 servative and Liberal, can vie with 
 each other in giving our Dominion 
 that military strength which is .so im- 
 portant an element of national great- 
 ness. 
 
 For these reasons our statesmen 
 should devote special pains to foster 
 in every way an organization which 
 tends to weld the nation together, to 
 cultivate a national and patriotic spirit, 
 and to make the whole nation defen- 
 sively warlil- '^, and confident in the 
 future of the State. 
 
 Unfortunately our politicians look 
 at questions solely from party stand- 
 points, and are little influenced by na- 
 tional considerations ; consequently 
 when the expenditure is to be reduced 
 the first thing to suffer is the militia. 
 The reduction does not aflfect the staff 
 
 — which is maintained at tlu^ same 
 strength, although th(! force is reduce<l 
 by one-half — but the whole burden 
 falls upon the men of the force, 
 their numbers are cut down, their pay 
 reduced, their camps dispensed with, 
 and the morale of the foi'co thereby 
 greatly diminished, and the efficiency 
 seriously im])aire(.. 
 
 Is this reduction necessary ? Is it 
 advisable even upon purely financial 
 grounds ? It must not be overlooked 
 that we are contending against the 
 reduction of drill pay, etc., for the ac- 
 tive force only, for there has V)een lit- 
 tle or no reduction in the cost of tlio 
 machinery by which the force is gov- 
 erned. Now, the «lrill ])ay of oHi-tcrs 
 and men goes directly into the hands 
 of the tax-payers themselves. There 
 is scarcely a family in Canada that has 
 not some relative in the force, and. 
 the trifling sums paid in this way 
 go back into the country households, 
 and in many and many a township is 
 the only Government money ever 
 seen, and is, in fact, the only return 
 they ever seem to get for their taxes. 
 There may be a fallacy in this, but 
 they believe it, notwithstanding. 
 
 It issometimes urged that the labour 
 is lost to the country ^/hile the men 
 are at drill. This may be right in 
 theory, but it is a mistake in le- 
 ality. The drills are performed at 
 night, or in the month of June — be- 
 tween haying and harvestr — and prac- 
 tically do not cause one grain of wheat 
 less to be sown, or one bushel less to be 
 reaped, while the country has the ad- 
 ded strength of a trained and effective 
 military organization. 
 
 Some argue that the militia force is 
 not as efficient as a regular army would 
 be, and that, therefore, the money 
 spent upon the organization is wasted. 
 Granted that a regular force would be 
 more efficient, but a Canadian regular 
 army would needs be very small and 
 disproportionately costly. The Mount- 
 ed Police, 300 in number, cost for last 
 year ISO.'i.TiO.OS. The annual diill 
 pay for the whole number of militia 
 
 ^ 
 
>■• 
 
 .4 I'LEA For* THE MILITIA. 
 
 \ 
 
 trainod last yoar was i'i'l'Jl.LMu.Or), or 
 little more than a third of tho cost of 
 tbe Mounted Police. Afjain A and B 
 Batteiies Dominion Artillery, about 
 250 men, ccmt ;?101),»ii» I. ;?.'), or \\ as 
 much as the entire militia were paid 
 for drill. Will any one in his nonses 
 claim that there would he as much 
 military strength in a regular force of 
 2r)0 or ;50() men, as in a militia num- 
 bering 4r),()0() 1 
 
 It is also a mistake to consider that 
 the whole value of the present force 
 consists in the high state of drill in 
 which it is, or should be kept. If we 
 have not absolute etHciency, we have, 
 as a starting point, the organization, 
 the arms, and the equipment — the 
 olKcers fairly efficient, and the rough 
 edge taken off the men. War would 
 not probably come at a day's notice, 
 and every day after our men were 
 mobilized, they would gain in steadi- 
 ness. Had we not our present organi- 
 zation, or were it abolished for ten 
 years, six months of the greatest effoi-ta 
 would not do as much to bring the 
 force to an efficient state, as six weeks 
 would do under the present circum- 
 stances. 
 
 A great advantage is also realized 
 in the militaiy spirit created in the 
 country. A' -esent almost every 
 young man se^ /es for a longer or 
 shorter period in the ranks of the 
 militia. Many people thiiik that, be- 
 cause they leave the force before they 
 are thoroughly efficient as soldiers, 
 their service is wasted and their train- 
 ing useless. There can be no greater 
 mistake. When a lad of 18 or 20 
 has donned the uniform and shouldered 
 the lifle, and drilled even for one year, 
 a great deal has been done. The idea 
 that he is a Canadian — that he may 
 some 4ay be called upon to defend his 
 ccuntiy — has entered his mind, and as 
 long as he lives thereafter he will be a 
 better citizen. Twenty years after, if 
 war should break out, his first thought 
 would be ' My country is in danger, I 
 must shoulder my rifle again and go 
 to the front ; ' while, if he had never 
 
 b(!cn in th(^ force, h(^ would probably 
 say, ' Thi'Pi will be war, and I am 
 afraid our militia will linve more than 
 vhe ' can do to defend the country,' 
 but he will not think of enllHtiny; to 
 help them. Perhaps, like a craven, ho 
 mij,'ht say, 'The odds are too great, we 
 should not ])rovoke the enemy by re- 
 siHtanoc.' From this point of view 
 alone, the militia oiganization is of im- 
 mense service! to the country. 
 
 Canadians have the historical re- 
 putation of being defensively the most 
 warlike people in the world, and it 
 should be the ])art of our legishitors to 
 cultivate and (Micourage that feeling. 
 Like Switzerland, we will never be 
 aggressive, but who shall say that we 
 may not have to fight desperately for 
 our separate existence as a nat'on in 
 the future, as we have done in tln^ past. 
 Already the muttered thunder from the 
 East has reached our ears — why may 
 not the gathering storm reach and de- 
 vastate our shores ? Can we reconcile 
 it with our duty as loyal subjects and 
 good citi:cens, that we should neglect 
 those measures which may be necek. 
 sary in order to preserve our national 
 existence ; or are we to be ' like dumb 
 driven cattle ' instead of ' heroes in 
 the strife 1 '* When the exigency arises 
 it will be too late for precautionaiy 
 measures. It is necessary to prepare 
 for war in time of peace. 
 
 But it is to be feared that persua- 
 sions and warnings alike fall upon 
 heedless ears. Because the militia 
 force is not a political organization ; 
 because they have wisely and rightly 
 held aloof from politics, they are ig- 
 nored by our politicians. But though 
 ab.stainirg from taking an active part 
 in politics, the militia has, and can 
 exercise, an important influence in 
 elections. In 1872, Sir George Car- 
 tier, the then Minister of Militia, was 
 defeated in Montreal, because the 
 volunteers and their friends voted 
 * en masse ' against him. In tliis last 
 election the general dissatisfaction of 
 the Force was doubtless one of the 
 causes of the sti'iking defeat of the 
 
r 
 
 T 
 
 :t?x 
 
 8 
 
 I I'l.KA FOH rut: MILITIA. 
 
 Mufkcnzu! UovfiniiH'tit. I<ft us then 
 H|i|M>iil, ii|iori |iiiri>ly HoliiHli ^touiuIh, 
 for tlic iiilliiiiK (• ,'111(1 HU|>|ii)if of iiiii' 
 iiicihIkth of I'lirliaiiM'iit,, in oidfr lliii( 
 tho (JovcniiiitMit of tin- iliiv iiiny treat 
 lilinuUy tlu* most ]io|tuliir .'iihI iiillii- 
 niti:il of our national oi'vui'i^'hI ions. 
 
 'I'll tlin |»('o|ilt? \vc must also u|i|ioal, 
 to ooii(|m'r that apatliy witli wlii.li 
 they liavo vujwi'd our pa.-)fc sti U!,'jjl( h 
 for exiHtonce. Do tl- y rwnizn tliat if 
 tho prcsout Forc'P is discoiiras^t'd (o 
 (h'iith, tlic law pro' ' Ics for tlio cHtal)- 
 lishuicnt of the ballot, and that ein- 
 ployers, in.itoad of rnipioyeH, may lie 
 forond iuto the ranks ? I )() tlH>y rcalizt? 
 that each younj( inaii who <j;oes out to 
 drill, ir. "Vcry year, sacrKices from !*S 
 to 810 for their direct lieuelit, and 
 v'ithout reaping any Kpee:ti<' advan- 
 tage thorefoi- 1 ho they lealize tlio 
 ju'otectiou that the presence of the 
 Force affords their prop<;rty an J their 
 
 li\(K? VV'hnt would liave stayed the 
 liilgriuiage riots in Toronto sav<! tho 
 presence of an armed force? What 
 would have stayed tho sacking of 
 Mont rial, had no volunteers been at 
 hand on the !i>th Jidv? 
 
 Our dt'sires an; most reasonaltle. 
 We only ask that the provisions of 
 the Militia Law slioiild he slightly 
 uiiKiwhul and r'gitlly enforced, and 
 that a little i.. :e money Hhuuld bo 
 spent in tlm annual training of tliti 
 men. All that is wanted, in addition, 
 is that the Canadian people should 
 take a living interest and jjridt) in 
 their citizen soldiery ; encourage thorn 
 hy precept and exaniple. and stimu- 
 late, ratlier than retard, their efforts 
 to fulfil their duty. (Jive tho militia- 
 man tlui lOciiH stdiHili tliat he deserves 
 to have in the community, and tlie 
 community will reap the reward in 
 the hora* of danger. 
 
I