SMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) m f/ / {< (/J fA 1.0 I.I 1.25 IIIM 12.5 1^ .^ 1^ 12 1.4 1.6 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 872-4503 ^ ^•v t.'^ i\ \ "% V ■^■fl' ^^\ a> n.^..^«. ^-i^ C^ Q, CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian institute for Historical Microreproductions Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 1980, Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked below. D Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur I I Covers damaged/ Couverture endommagde □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaurde et/ou pellicul6e □ Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque □ Coloured maps/ Cartes g^ographiques en couleur D Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Ehcre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ D D D Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ Relid avec d'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ L3 reliure serr^e peut causer de I'ombre ou do la distortion le long de la marge intdrieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont pas 6t6 film^es. Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl6mentaires: L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la mdthode normale de fiimage sont indiquds ci-dessous. □ Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur I I Pages damaged/ H' Pages endommagdes Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaur^es et/ou pellicul6es r~^ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ I — I Pages d6color6es, tachetdes ou piqu^es □Pages detached/ Pages ddtachdes Showthrough/ Transparence □ Quality of print varies/ Quality in^gale de I'impression □ Includes supplementary material/ Comprend du materiel supplementaire □ Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponibie □ Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure tho best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, e*r., ont M6 filmdes d nouvoau de fagon d obtenir la meilleure image possible. rrr This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ LjIJ Ce document est filmd au taux de reduction indiqud ci-dessous. IPX 14X 18X 22X I I I I I I I I I I I I Iv I 26X 30X 12X 16X 20X 24X 23X 32X The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: Library of the Public Archives of Canada The images appearing here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in l i a 4 a 1 1 13S Post- French. 11 8 9 14 1 5 1 1 Percentage. 27 i* 90 74 50 55 50 M >^/y/ T The first column of the table skives the townships. In the second is given the number of viilaj^c sites so far recorded in each township. The third contains the number of village sites at which French relics have been found, and the relative percentage which these bear to the whole number recorded is carried out into the f(jurth. This is done for the purpose of comparing one township wiih another. The fifth, sixth, and seventh contain similar statistics relating to the ossuaries. The townships arc arranged in the table, beginning at Georgian Bay and descending .southward. Hearing this fact in mind and glanc- ing down the fourth column, it will be observed how rapidly the percentage of villages whore French relics have been found falls off" after leaving the first few townships in the remote north beside Georgian liAy. This was the district occupied by the Hurons in the time of the Jesuit missionaries of the seventeenth century. If we draw a line from east to west through Kempenfeldt Hay on Lake Simcoe, it will be .seen that of all villages south of this line less than twenty per cent, have yielded French reiics. The difference in the geographical distribution of these relics on the two sides of this line is made apparent by contrasting one representative township from each part, say Mcdonte and Innisfil. In Medonte 41 village sites have been entered in the catalogue, of which no less than 33 (or 80 per cent, of them) have yielded French relics ; while of 30 village sites in Innisfil, only 5 (or 17 per cent.) have yielded French relics, and merely one or two i.solated tomahawks in most of these five cases. There is a wide difference here — viz., between 80 per cent, and 17 per cent., and this difference of geographical distribution can only be accounted for by supposing that the larger part of the villages ot Innisfil, as well as of the others south of the line just drawn, were occupied by Hurons before the arrival of the French traders. In York and Ontario counties theie is but one case in each, so far as the wricer has ascertained, of European relics having been found at Huron village sites, and in neither of these ca.ses is the evidence very conclusive. Many European relics have been found at Algonquin sites in these two counties, and the two cases in question may be of relics lost by later Mississagas on the ground previously oc- cupied by the Huron lodges. Independent evidence of a similar character is furnished by the ossuaries There is no proof of any Frencn relics having been found in the ossuaries south of the line through Kempenfeldt Hay, that is in South Simcoe, York, and Ontario. Hut in North Simcoe the percent- age runs as high as 74. The classification affords us a means of arriving approximately at the date of Huron occupation of these parts cf Central Ontario under consideration. The beginning of French intercourse with the Hurons may be said to have taken place in 1615, when Champlain made his celebrated journey to their country. From that year onward traffic between the French and Hurons was established. So that speaking in a general way, this date, 161 5, is the dividing line between post-French and ante-French villages. Wherever French relics are found, in most cases it may be concluded that the village dates after 161 5. The table therefore shows that the sites in N. Simcoe, near Georgian Hay, were mostly post-French, while the more southerly ones — those in S. Simcoe, York and Ontario — were chiefly ante-French. The former statement might readily have been inferred from our historical data of the first half of the seventeenth century, without the assistance of arch;Eology ; but little of an historical nature has been known with rc^'ard to the numerous Huron sites of S. Simcoc, York and Ontario. It would appear from the tabic that they chiefly belong to a period precedmg the sites of N. Sim<.oc There are references in the early French writers to an increase of population in the Huron tract (now Noith Simcoe) from which we may infer that what mi^'ht he called a migration took place. Champlain and Le Caron in 1615 reckoned 17 or 18 villages in the Huron penin- sula, with 10,000 persons. Brebeuf. in 1635 — 20 years later — found 20 villages, and about 30,000 souls. [Rehitwns (Canadian edition) 1635, P- 33 ; 1536, p. 138.] Here is evidence of a rapid influx from .some (juarter into the sheltered peninsula of N. Simcoe, between the years 1615 and 1635. The aborigines of any country arc always found at the corner op- posite to the point of entry of their invaders. This was the ca^e with the early Celts of Britain, the Lapps of North Europe, the Ra.sques of Southern France, and indeed' with every race of conquered people known to history. It mighl therefore be expected that the Hurons would remove as far as possible from their enemies, the Iroquois ; and it was in this po.sition— against the northerly limit of land adapted to agricultural pursuits — that they were found by the early French. These inferences from historical considerations have been fully confirmed bv the table of .sites given, from which it is evident that a removal from the sites of Ontario, York and S. Simcoe took place about the time the French first came. In conclusion, it may be .stated that there is another important feature of the N. Simcoc sites, not indicated in the table, and which though highly important, will be merely alluded to in this paper. The largest Huron village sites in the country are found there, and they are likewise post-French. It would appear from this that as danger from the invading Iroquois grew greater, the population became amas.sed into larger villages for saiety. 300— fr-a-'ya. i ^i