WfWK 4^ AN AOOOUNT OP THK Canadian Protest AQAINST THE INTROOUOTION INTO OANAOA or - Musical Examinations BY 0UT8IDI MUSICAL EXAMINING BODIES -? AN ACCOUNT OF THE (Canadian Protest AGAINST THh INTRODUCTION INFO CANADA OP Musical Examinations BY Outside Musical Examining Bodies I dilcil, tompik-d, ami published by order of The Canadian Proleslinn Conimlltee COMMITTEE: Mr. James L Hughes, Chairman F. H. Torringlon Edward Fisher W. E. Fairclough ^- ^- ^09' W. O. Forsyth W. Elliott Haslam J. D.A.Tripp J. Humfrey Anger C. L. M. Harris W. Norman Andrews E. R. Doward W. Caven Barron S. T. CHURCH, Hon. Secretary Toronto, Cnnadn, V/nn/i, i,S()<) i3 r^'''4,^^K^i^ \\\\ advent into Canada of the Associated Board of S) \y^._ ■X.M Musical Examiners of the Royal College of Music, and ."^ ' ii{j£5/'£ ll'c Royal Academy of Music, London, England, for ^ O-'^l the purpose of establishing Musical J'",xaminations has awaken- ed keen uiterest m musical circles both in England and in the Dominion. In order to place in the possession of the members of the musical fraternity throughout the Dominion an authentic account of the Associated Hoard's operations in Canada, and the vigorous protest entered by Canadian musicians against its encroach- ment this pul)lication has been authorized. A number of letters to the press of Canada as well as extracts from leading English journals are presented, as representing the most important from amongst a very largely accumulated correspondence. Correspondence between prominent Canadian and English umsicians and examining bodies, prior to the establishment of Canadian examinations in recent years, is incorporated. The |)rotest, together with the large number of signatures appended, and which has already been forwarded to distinguished personages in England is included. Extracts are also intro- duced from letters to the Canadian press showing the antagonism manlf'^sted toward the musical profession in Canada by the honorary secretary of the Associated Board. It will be seen in their determined objection to this movement, that while Canadian musicians have enlisted the sympathy and gained the respect of unprejudiced musical authorities in England, supplemented by out-spoken condemnation of the Board's Canadian exploit by a number of responsible English journals, they have at the same time incurred the displeasure of the honorary secretary of the Associated Board, Mr. Samuel Aitken, to whose manner of resentment special attention is directed. The allegation that opposition to the Associated Board in Canada, originated with and continues to be agitated by the established musical institutions here, having selfish ends in view, has been successfully refuted by the large number of names of individual musicians who have subscribed to the protest, and who are entirely independent of those schools. ._,_„__.„ __ Ul _ _ „ _ .^,___., ..:; It miylu further he said that llio imisiiians of Ontario, irres- pective of creed, nationality or musical coiuiectioii, have joined in the organization of an association, having; for its object tlic holding; of musical examinations in the Province, under University auspices, and which initiative it is anticipated will ultimately result in the formntion of a national musical examining body. The present unpleasantncs;; a< tually exists l)etween the Associated Board as represented in (Canada l)y its honorary secretary, Mr. Samuel Aitken and the musical profession here, as such. The difficulty has arisen from a determination on the part of the Associated IJoard to occupy the field on other than ecpiitaljle terms with the profession in Canada, withholding from the latter the i)rivileges and advantages of co-i)artnership, and suggesting instead the distinction of mere agency. Finding Canadian musicians opposed to its one-sided policy, and to certain features of the proposed examinations, the Associated Hoard, through its honorary secretary, has determined to impose its offices upon the country at all hazards, with the sole oliject of " reaping where it has not sown," leaving the Canadian teacher of music to bear the burden of the day in the preparation of candidates, the Associated Jioard with charac- teristic siiiij^- /iiiid, proposes to appropriate the piocceds. Under the Associated Hoard's regime in (."an.ada, the Canadian nuisician is clearly outlined and well defined as a musical " Colonist," and as such is expected to humbly subr... to the imperious dictate of the Hoard. In default of such acquiescence, Mr. Aitken has already seen fit to impugn the motives and to api)ly a variety of offensive epithets against those who, having the courage of their convictions, assert themselves in opposition to his views and his mistaken policy. A glance at the several letters which have appeared in the daily press, over the signatures of Mr. Aitken and certain of his agents in Canada, will sufifice to show the spirit actuating these gentlemen. The following compilation of undignified phraseology, selected from recent letters to the press, over the signature of the honorary secretary of the Associated Hoard, referring to members of the musical profession and the established musical institutions of the country, is given as an example of what apparently constitutes Mr. Aitken's conception of cultured and dignified expression. "Trading institutions," "no device too mean," "no untruth too gross," " no statement too spiteful," "a pitiful display of interested preju- dice and passion," "coarse personalities," "prejudiced professors," "vulgar abuse," " crass stupidity," "willful v.'ickedness," " limbo of forgotten and dishonored memories," "coarse and unmannerly," "these scribblers," "the pluck to fight," "amiable professors," "venom and poison," " fighting below the belt," "ignorance," "solemn farce," etc., etc. The above aimed ;it tlic very institiilions ami ncnllcmcn of ihe pro- fession with whom Mr. Ailineslions proffered repeatedly during a number of years l)y representative Canadian musicians, encouraging co operation on a mutual l)asis, the present slate of affairs would not have been possible. A detailetl review of the experien( e of the Associated Hoard, under the directorship of its honorary secretary, its origin and continued existence as a means of revenue to the Royal Academy of Music and Royal College of Music, its wranglings with the profession in England, its connection with the pul)lication and control of the music used in its examinations, and the severe criticism deservedly centered against it by the English [)ress as regards the Hoard's Canadian exploit, would, in addition to what has already been said and that which will appear later on m this pul)lication, constitute a volume of highly interesting reading. The foregoing, together with other good reasons which time and space will not permit mention of, make it the duly of every loyal Canadian musician to discountenance the presence, condemn the operation and emphatically refuse to entertain the proposals of the Associated Hoard, or any other outside musical examining body, except on a strictly mutual basis. This desiral)ility is conspicuously absent in the Associated Hoard's Canadian campaign. Following is the protest. It will be observed that the signatures sub- scribed thereto are representative of the musical profession in Canada as a body. A number of signatures have been n^ -eived too late for publi- cation. Copies of the protest have been forwarded to : HIS ROYAL HIG/fXESS, THE PRINCE OF WALES, President of the Associated Board of the Royal Academy of Music and the Royal College of Music, London, England. THE EARL OF APER DEES', Ex-Canadian President of the Associated Hoard of the Royal Academy of Music and the Royal College of Music, London, England. HIS EXCELLENCY, THE EARL OF MINTO, Cnrvernor-General of Canada, Canadian President of the Associated Board of the Royal Academy of Music and the Royal College of Music, Ijjnd, n, England. [Sl ANNOUiNCEMKNT j« j«^ Gourlay, Winter & Leeming UP-TO- DATE PIANOS At GorRi.AY, Wintkk it I.kk.minu's Wakkroo.ms, iSrse for its heini,'' old; but there is little new ill violin niakinj^, whilst in piani> making' there is somethinj^^ new every year. Hence the |ioint is plain— buy a piano that is up-to- date, as well as one that improves with aj^e and use. ^ife Among Pianos the GERHARD HEINTZMAN is up-to-date and improves v/ith years of use. Five, fifteen, and twenty year olil Pianos made by Cieriiard Heintzinan conunand big' prices at auction or private siile, wiiile the Ciertiard Heiiilztiiaii Piano of to-diy is pre-eminently the most perfect exponent of the Canadian Piaiiomaker's art. CALL AND EXAMINK — VOL- WILL HE MADE WELIOME. 1 88 V'oNGE St. IIOXOKMil.l: JOSEril III AMUERI.A l\, Coloiii.il Sirrf/iin; l.on- i/iiii, h.iifiiiind. LORD STh'ATIK'OXA, High Commissioner Jur Cunatla, lAtmlou, Eng- I It ml, SIR M.EKASDRR McKES'/IKinid other tmiuhcrs of tin- facultv ami i>i(iiiit<;itinnf of //if Roviil Aiinlrniv olMt(sii\ l.in(ifiins are on file in the office of the Hon. Secretary of the Canadian /Protesting ( onimittee, Toronto, Canada. J. D. Dussault, organist and choirmaster, Notre Dame Cathedral, Montreal. R. O, Pelletier, organist and choirmaster, St. James Cathedral, " Wni. Hohrer, teacher of music, " Horace Reyner, Mus. Hac, A.R.C.O., '* R. R. Stevenson, Esej., " Arthur Dorey, organist Emmanuel Church, " C. E. B. Price, .V.R.C.O., organist and choirmaster, St. An- drew's Church, " W. (xould, conductor Symphony Orchestra, " P. J. Illsley, Mus. Bac, A.R.C.O., organist and choirmaster, St. George's, Herbert d. Starr, I,. Mus., organist and choirmaster, Taylor Church, Septimus Eraser, L. Mus., teacher piano, > >^ Dominique Ducharme, teacher of music, organist Jesu Church, " Arch. Fortier, composer and teacher of music, " Emery Lavigne, organist and choirmaster, Church of the Messiah, " Max Bohrer, teacher of piano, " Wm. Reed, organist American Presbyterian Church, " Marguerite Sim, teacher of pianoforte, " 18] F. H. Torrington, musical director, organist and choirmaster, Metropolitan Methodist Church, Toronto Edward Fisher, Mus. Doc; musical director, organist and choir- inasler, New St. Andrews Church, VV. O. Forsyth, musical director, teacher and composer, J. D. A. Tripp, musical director and piano virtuoso, Albert Ham, Mus. Doc, Trinity College, Dublin, F.R.C.O., organist and choirmaster, St. James Cathedral, J. Humfrey Anger, Mus. Hac Oxon., F.R.C.O., organist and choirmaster Old St. Andrews, A. S. Vogt, musical director, teacher organ and piano, organist and choirmaster, Jarvis St. Baptist Church, E. R. Doward, teacher of organ, organist and choirmaster, Broad- way Methodist Tabernacle, Rechai) Tandy, voice culture, W. Elliott Haslam, voice culture, Hugh Kennedy, voice culture, \V. E. Fairclough, F.R.C.O., teacher organ and piano, organist and choirmaster. All Saints Church, E. W. Schuch, vocal teacher, choirmaster Church Redeemer, S. T. Church, voice correction and regulation, W. E. Barclay, teacher of piano, J. \V. F. Harrison, teacher of piano and organ, organist and choir- master, St. Simon's Church, Mrs. Mallon, teacher piano. Miss M. Husl)and, teacher piano, Miss Birnie, teacher piano, ~ M. Taylor, teacher violin. Miss Mansfield, teacher of theory. Miss Tait, teacher piano, W. J. A, Carnahan, vocal teacher, W. J, McNally, piano, organist and choirmaster. West Presby- terian Church, J. Bailey, violinist and teacher, J. M. Sherlock, singing master, A. T. Cringan, Sup't. music Public Schools, Donald Herald, teacher piano, Alice Denzil, vocal teacher, '^ May Kirkpatrick, teactier piano, Carrie E. Dallas, teacher piano, Edith M.Crittenden, teacher of piano, __ J^ _ ^ „ " Maud Gordon, teacher piano, " Annie Johnston, teacher piano, «' Edmund Hardy, Mus. Bac, « CANADA'S GREATEST MOSIC HOUSE Music •■"' 1^^) IMusical Instruments OF EVERY DESCRIPTION Music Publishers and Importers, Music Engravers and Printers. Foreign Publi- cations and Theoretical Works a Specialty. EDITIONS, Peters, Breitkopf & Hartel, Schirmer Library, Litolff, Augener, Schmidt, Wood, Vienna Conservatory, and Whaley-Royce. I he Largest Stock and most complete Music and Musical Instrument Supply House in C^'Uiada. Special Terms to the Profession, Schools and Convents. Send for Catalogue mentioning goods required. ^♦« ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦^ X 11^ V* t^* %^^ V^ *^^ (^Vf^V w** Phenomenal in tbeir Development. Unapproacbed in Merit. Whaley=| n t Unapproacbed in Merit. ImOyCG e^ «^ ♦ Eggentlaily the Piano of the People Pianos ^ INSPECTION INVITED Catalogues and prices furnished on are examples of all S application. that is Latest and X Terms to suit the most modest income. Best in the realm of ^ . Piano Construction.^ 1 r . , ^ - '♦♦♦♦»»♦♦♦<♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Whaley-Royce & Co* 158 Yongc Street, TORONTO IJella M. (leddes, teacher piano, 'loroiUo Bertha I). Adamsnn, teacher violin, lsal)el Christie, teacher piano, Sara R. Bradley, teacher voice, Annie Park, teacher voice, Lena M. Hayes, teacher violin, M. B. Henrich, teacher piano, Annie Halhvorth, teacher voice, ChrisliTie 'I'. Nichols, lea':her piano, Campbell Stiiltshury, teacher voice. Amy Rol)sart [affray, teacher voice, Harriet S., Taylor, teacher piano, Peter Kennedy, teacher piano and organ, Lou Sajous, voice teacher, Roberta A. Welsh, teacher piano, VV. Caven Barron, musical director, London J. VV. Fealherston, musical director, VV. H. Hewlett, organist Dundas Methodist church, Thomas Martin, musical director, R. J. Hyttenrauch, musical director. Alma College, St. Thomas, Katharine Moore, vocal teacher, Chas. Wheeler, organist, St. Andrew's Church, Helen Patterson, A.T.C.M., Henry S. Saunders, music teacher, Nettie Barron, music feacher, Beatrice Gil)son, music tei cher, Jennie Steele, music teacher, Lottie Frances, music teacher, Roselle Pococke, violinist and teacher, VV. Norman Andrews, organist Grace Church, Brantford. A. I). Jordan, organist and choirmaster Brant Ave. Methodist Church, F. H. Burt, musical director, Listitution for the Blind, *• John H. Renwick, organist First Methodist Church, St. Thomas. VVilliam Noxon, organist Knox Church, J. L. Fisher, music teacher. Rev. L R. Warner, M.A., principal, Alma College, VV. Spencer Jones, organist, -- - BrockviUe. Margaret Jamieson, music teacher, Sarah P. Sherwood, music teacher, - - Martha E. Moore, music teacher, J. H. Fulford, violin teacher, " tii] CI It II tt II II u • I II II II II II II II ii II II II II II i( II II II II (( 11 M II II tl Cbc H^ominfon College of fllbuslc FOUNDED 1894, INCORPORATED 1895 (In affiliation with the University of Bishop's College, Lennozville.) 994 Dorchester Street, Montreal Offers a complete course of musical education in all branches of practical and theoretical music, under the best teachers in the Province. Examinations for diplomas, including those of Licentiate and Associate, are held tri-annually. For all particulars and any other information, apply to PERCIVAL J. ILLSLEY, Mus.B., Mrs. Rol)erta Harvey, organist St. (lenrge's, Kva J. Taylor, Mus. liac, organist St. James, J. Trewell, musical director, Charles R. Crowe, organist and choirmaster, Methodist Church, Jessie T. Hill, teacher [)iano, W. H. Dingle, organist and teacher of music, Etheline (1. Thomas, organist St. Andrews Church, C. M. Tripp, organist Methodist Tabernacle, Mabel G. Johnstone, teacher piano, M. Theresa Young, teacher piano. Miss Julia Campbell, organist St Thomas' Church, Percy Pa.scoe, organist Knox Church, Margaret F. Crooks, music teacher, Marion Shedden, music teacher, C. L. M. Harris, Mus. Hac, C. E. Sanders, Th.!)., choirmaster Dominion Methodist Church, Belle Christie, teacher of music, Presliyterian College, Laura Stewart, music teacher, A. F. Hoover, music teacher, Hertie McAlpin, A.T.C.M., J. J. Hare, principal Ontario Ladies' College, Jessie A. MacLeod, organist and music teacher, (iuelph. Belleville. II i( Woodstock. 11 II Hamilton. Ottawa. II Listowel. Peterborough. Petrolea. Whitl)y. Georgetown. To the profession in Montreal is: due the credit of having taken the initiative in the protest. The prominent names appearing at the head of the above list is significant of the attitude of the musical fraternity in the largest city in the Dominion, and in which is located the headtiuarters of the Associated Board in Canada. THE ASSOCIATED BOARD'S ALLEGED INVITATION TO CANADA. The principal claim advanced by the agents of the Associated Board in justification of its action in including Canada in its colonial musical examination scheme is to the effect that the Board had been invited to come here. In a letter to the Globe, Oct. 19th, 1898, Mr. J. Bayne McLean, of Montreal, Hon. (ieneral Representative of the Associated Board in Canada, in support of the above claim, quotes from certain cor- respondence alleged to have passed between the Associated Board and Messrs. F. H. Torrington and J. Humfrey Anger, Mus. Bac, Oxon., F. R.C.O., of Toronto, and Mr. Percival J. Illsley, Mus. Bac, Montreal. >3l From Mr. Illsley's correspondence of some five years ago the follow- ing is ([uoted : " There is a strong desire in Montreal for praclical examinations for pianoforte and organ pupils from some recognized Knglish institutions, in order to advance the culture of instrumental and vocal music in this city." Mr. Torrington is credited with the following, in a letter, of not very recent date, to Sir Alexander McKenzie : "I should prefer most decidedly to see our country take advantage of the opportunity for securing the nmsical endorsement of the Royal Academy and Royal College," etc., etc. Mr. Anger's correspondence of nearly three years ago is drawn upon for the following ([uotation : " Examinations under the auspices of such an important Hoard appear to me very good, and the time is now ripe for the same. ... I would suggest that the examinations lie carried out on a broader basis than that proposed in yout syllabus." In his letter Mr. McLean in no wise betrays the all-important fact that the conditions existing at die time this alleged correspondence took place no longer exist. MR. TORRINGTONS REPLY. The following letter from Mr. F. H. Torrington, appeared in the Toronto Daily Globe ^ Oct. 27th. In his reply Mr. Torrington de- fines his attitude for years past in an endeavor to bring about a union of F^nglisl; and Canadian musicians on ecpiitable terms. To the Editor of the Globe : "A letter in the Globe of Saturday, Oct. 21, 1898, over the signature of John I3ayne McLean, relative to musical examinations in Canada, begins in rather questionable form, by casting reflections on Canadian musicians, who take exception to the introduction here of musical examinations as pro- jected by the Hon. Secretary of the Associated Hoard in England — and imputing 'ignorance' or interested motives to those in this country who do not receive the scheme in the meek spirit evidently expected by the enter- prising Hon. Secretary and the honorable general representative in Mon- treal. In discussing the question at issue, I shall not adopt a similar line of argument, but simply advance what I believe to be in the direction of right and justice to Canadian musicians, and ir: the true interests of Can- adian musical development upon right and legitimate lines. With a view to show what I know was, and I believe still is, the real sentiment of FLnglish musicians towards Canadian musicians and their work, and the friendly attitude in England towards efforts that have been made here to bring about co-operation between Canada and England on a fair and equitable basis, and also to show why I cannot welcome the scheme introduced into Canada by the Hon. Secretary, whose attitude towards musicians here is not in ac- cord with that of the eminent musicians from whose letters I shall (juote, ■ ['4l withoiil violating the good faith which is su[)pnsed to obtain in connection with private personal correspondence. "Some years ago tliere was a movement on foot to l)ring al)oiit amal- gamation between the Canadian College of Organists (now held in abeyance) and the I'-nglish College of Organists, and ([iiite an extensive c()rres[)ondence was entered into with Dr. (now Sir) Alexander .Mackenzie, Dr. (now Sir) I'Yederick iiridge, Dr. rur[)in, and others. Dr. Bridge wrote Feb. 20, 1892 : 'As to your College of Organists, the subject was brought forward last night at the council meeting of the College of Organists, and everyone desired greatly to fmd some method by wliii h your college could be, as it were, joined to ours.' Dr. Mackenzie, A|)ril 7, 1892, wrote: 'Touching the ICnglish College of Organists amalgamation, I am ([uite with you. I thor- oughly believe in joining hands when schemes are honest.' Dr. 'I'urpin's communication, dated Slay 2, 1892, slated that, 'The Council of the Col- lege of Organists here decided at a recent meeting to express sympathy with your kind proposal to enter into fraternal relations with us. To this end we shall be glad to know how we can serve the Canadian ('ollege of Organists. Here are one or two ideas. Members of the two colleges might have reciprocal membership and perhaps other mutual advantages. Most important in a practical way would l)e some mutual action in con- nection with examinations. Papers might be drawn up on both sides to serve both institutions. It might be possible annually to send one of our examiners to assist your examiner. We might exchange lectures. Your members might, when in T-ondon, make our college their musical home. Financially, it would be well to keep both colleges apart, because it would not be right perhaps for distinct governing bodies to have mixed money responsibilities. We shall be glad to take prompt action now upon any proposals you may present.' " In addition to the above, when in London last, I attended a meeting, by invitation, held at the Royal College of Organists' rooms — Clarence Lucas, formerly of 'I'oronto, being with me — at which Sir John Stainer expressed the most cordial sympathy with Canadian musicians and their work in Canada, which expressions I have not failed to convey to Canadian musicians. I'ermit me to say that I never was, nor am I now, personally antagonistic to the idea of having the examination of the Royal Academy or the Royal College of Music extended to Canada, upon the lines and in the spirit of the suggestions of the eminent musicians referred to, and if I am now found in the ranks of those who protest against the scheme under discussion, it is because the Hon. Secretary, in his mode of introducing his scheme, has assumed a position directly opposed to the spirt of that mani- fested by these gentlemen, and seeks to put a sort of spider's web over musical Canada, and, although he distinctly states that the body he repre- sents 'do not teach,' he proposes to extract the fees from the results of Canadian musicians' work, who form the body in this country who ' do teach,' and this I consider an unjust and unfair proceeding, !n addition to which, the conditif)ns relating to musical examinations for Canada, now, are not the same as they were when the letters to which the Hon. Secretary seems to have had access were written. "Further, I believe that when the effect of the scheme of the Hon. Secretary upon the best musical interests of Canada is thoroughly under- i>5i :■' . :■ If you want a lano STUDY THE FIELD Examine the Pianos of leadinj? makers. Let tiiem point out the stron^jest points their instruments contain. Study the tone and mechanism. Look at them for beauty as you would at a picture, and when you have seen every point of merit, every feature that seems to add to the value of the instrument you have looked at, ex- amine the Mason & Risch In it you will find all that you have ad- mired in others, and additional points of merit which you have not seen. Catalogues mailed FHEH. Mason & Risch Piano Co. 32 KING ST. WEST, TORONTO stood, ami it is found that Ins acti i ,vill result in alienation, instead of binding,' Miiglisli and Canadian nuisieal effort more closely tO{;ether, it may 1)6 found that neither Hib Royal Highness the I'rince of Wales, our re- spected (fovernor-dcneral, Lord Aherdeen, nor the distinguished I'"nj;lish musicians from whose letters I have quoted, will he found to approve of the scheme now hefore the Canadian public. "In my next letter I will make clear the fact, and the nature of the proposition made to me by the Hon. Secretary. In concluding; this letter, I may say that I hope the new interest awakened in music and musical examinations will result in a more extended study of music in (Canada, and that examination certificates and titles will not he sought or awarded for merely business ends, but serve to show that real musical education, on broad lines, is the end sought for on all hands." V. H. TOKRINOTON. Toronto, October 27, 1898. MR. ANGER'S REPLY. Mr, J. Humfrey Anger, Mus. Mac, Oxon., F.R.C.O.,i.i a communication to the Globe, makes clear the conditions under which his letters had been written, and also the fact that these conditions are no longer in existence. Coming from one whose musical life and training have been developed under influences purely P^nglish, Mr. Anger's letter is significant. The following extracts are given ; — " What I said two years ago (I do not rememi)er the exact date), vix., that ' the time was ripe ' in Canada for English examinations is one thing, what I say now is that the time is over-ripe, it is too late. Permit me to ((uote from my letter which appeared in The Musical Xe^vs of August i3lh, (last August, not two or three years ago): — 'The leading musicians m Canada have studied in Europe, at London, at Berlin or I^eipzig, at Vienna or at I'aris. Some are men with English degrees and diplomas, and in my opinion they are as capable of carrying out with ability and honesty all details in connection with musical examinations as are the examiners belong- ing the institutions in England.' "This is the stumbling block to me. The board says that its exam- inations in Canada are to be ' exactly the same as in England,' but I say they are not, for the board would not dare, I repeat would not dare to offer this teacher's certificate in any provincial town in the old country. . . . "All I can say is that the opposition to these examinations includes professional musicians, that is to say, gentlemen who have devoted their whole life to the cause of the art and who do not dabble in business pursuits, and with a few exceptions here and there, this "opposition" includes all the leading musicians in Canada. And who are the gentlemen who are working in the interests of the Associated Board ? They are doubtlessly gentlemen holding high and responsible positions and respected by all, but they are not musicians. Thy do not claim to be musicians. The board distinctly states that it will not appoint musicians to be its representatives. Does it not seem odd, when you come to think of it ? If you are sick you go to a I-7I tToronto Colledc of ^usic IN AFFILIATION WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO 12-14 PEMBROKE STREET, TORONTO LiMITCO F. H. TORRINGTON. - Musical Director GEORGE GOODERHAM. • - President Special JfacillticB for highest musical educalinn provided at this institution. Students specially prepared for University examinations for Degrees in Music, the College Diploma heing accepted in lieu of ist and 2nd year University examinations. MEDALS, DIPLOMAS, TEACHERS' CERTIFICATES, ETC. MUSIC TAUGHT IN ALL ITS BRANCHES. IDocalists an& Solo Unstrumentaltsts prepared for church, Concert, Oratorio, and Opera work. Introduction to the public under the most favorable auspices. Positions found for duly-ijualified Organists and Teachers. COllCQC EraminattOnS. Two examinations are held in Toronto during the Collegiate year, the first taking place about Feb. 2olh, and the second in June. These examinations lead up to the University of Toronto examinations and are open to all. ,,^', . . Spring Term commences April 15th, 1899. I'upils may enter at any time. Write for Prospectus giving particulars. fl* fl* il* F. H. TORRINGTON. IM4 PEMBROKE ST., TORONTO medical man ; if in iloiiht on a li-^al matter you ((insult a lawyer ; if, how- ever, it is a (lUfstioii of referring ti» music then you settle it yourself. N'eriiy n little knowledge is a dangerous tinng." MR. ILLSLEY'S REPLY. The following letter from .Mr. I'erc ival J. Illslcy, Mus. Mac, Montreal, and wliK h ap|)earod in the Montreal " Ctii3f//t" serves still further to strciiKlhen the position taken hy Canadian musicians in this matter. Mr. lUsley's letter:— To the Kditorof the Citiectfc. "Sir, In your issue of to day I observe a letter from the general repre- sentative of the Asso(Malecl Moard of Musical Examiners, in which letter the writer has refored to remarks of mine in connection with this sul)je( t. "The letter ijuoted was written, now n\ore than five years ago, and at a time when the need of a good standard of musical e.Nannnations was felt in Canada, It was addressed to the secretary of the Royal Academy of Music. What was the result? Simply a reply stating that the hoard had the matter under consideration. Mut, sir, I look this to i)e a polite refusal, and five years is certainly a long time to wait, and circumstances may arise during such a space of time to warrant one to change an opinion. Now, in the year 1S97, the energetic secretary of the Associated Hoard visits Montreal. As a matter of common courtesy, and having knowledge of my recpiest or opinion five years previous, he ought to have at least invited me to confer with him. Hut he does no such thing. He adopts high handed methods and ignores the musical profession, whose sympathies he is supposed to enlist. He goes to business men, forms his centre and departs. Con- trast with this the conduct of the representative of the oldest and probably the best examining body in Kngland — Trinity College, London, who was lately here, in the person of Dr. Charles Vincent. What does he do? He sees a number of the best-known musicians of the city; he lays his plans before them, asks their advi( e, does not form his centre unless it is asked for. This he does in Toronto, as well as in Montreal, and consecjuently by his gentlemanly mann»*r and professional way of procedure, makes friends for both himself and for the college he represents. "Therefore, considering the course adopted by the Associated Moard, considering the character of their e.\.iminations, with the examiner to ad- judicate upon all branches of musical education, how can the Associated Board expect aught but opposition ? Take, for instance, the teachers' certificate, with its absurd title of C.T.A. M. How can one man certify to the ability of a person to teach ? It is surely the tjuality of his work that tells, not the possession of any diploma, so easily earned. A man may obtain his degree of M.D., but his nlma mater does not guarantee him to be a skillful practitioner. It is his al)ility to cope with, and successfully combat the diseases to which mankind is heir to, that is his certificate. Experentia docet, and surely, and of necessity, such must be the case with the teacher of music. " We of the profession of music are not antagonistic to the Associated Board as an examining body, so long as it confines its work in its proper channel and does not intrude upon our rights ; and certainly as leaders of the musical education we demand to have a voice in the matter. It is [>9 perfectly legitimate and right to have luisineNii men at the head of the ex- aminers, hut St. Paul said, " All things are lawful, hut all thingn are not expedient," and the (|iicsti()n naturally arisi-s . " Do Iiusmicsh men under- stand the ( Dndition of dungs musii al as well .is those who pursue the art ns their daily avocation, and who have heen educated and trained in the art ? Most certainly not. ''In iiiiulusion, I venture to think the matter may he thus lirietly sum- med up : "I. Had the Associated Hoard taken definite action five years ago, most itrohahly they would have had no opposition. "i. Had Mr. .Aiikcn, the honorary secretary, taken the inusi< ;il profes- sion into his conlideiK e and treated them as allies, most assuredly there would have heen no opposition. "3. If the .Associated Hoard wish to make their examinations a success in Canada, and which will lie for the lieiicfil of the musical edu> ation of the country, why do they not give us something hotter and loftier than what wc alrf^ady have. "4. Canadian institutions, regularly formed and irn'orporated, have, through the apathy of the Associated Moartl, heen loiiiulcd, and the men who estal)lished them are now in duly ho-iiul to uphold them, even at the expense of changing their opinions." I'KRCIVAI- J. II,I..SI.KV. FURTHER COMMENT ON MR. McLEAN'S LETTER. Toronto Saturdny Nighty in its issue of Oct. 2Hth, '98, proffers the following sententious criticism ; "Mr. John Hayne McLean, of Montreal, the 'honorary general re- presentative ' for Canada of the Associated Hoard of Kxaminers of London, Knglaiid, in a lengthy letter to last Saturday's (ilobc deals with the (juestion of the local examinations of the institution he re[)rcsents. He reproduces a iniinher of letters of very ancient date from leading Knt^lish-Canadian musicians who, hefore the syllahus of the Associated lioard, in all its heauty, had heen examined and the motives of the Hoard ilM)roughly understood, and hefore the conditions had changed, which at that time seemed to offer an opening in Canada for the higher examinations of the R. \. M. and R. C. M., had favored the estahlishment of a series of English examinations in this country, hut not hy any means the flimsy tests and the ahsurd scheme which the Associated Board now proposes to introduce here. It will he clear to all who know Messrs. Torrington, .Anger and Illsley (the gentlemen whose letters are reproduced) — and a more ardently loyal trio of Englishmen it would he impossihle to find under the sun — that there must have heen something decidedly "rotten in the state of Denmark" which would, at the risk of their i)eing misunderstood hy eminent memhers of the profession in England whose friendship they value, cause these gentlemen to now turn their hacks in disgust upon an undertaking which is throwing so much discredit u|)on the whole musical examination enterprise of the Old Land. Among other extraordinary and misleading features of Mr. McLean's epistle is the statement that "the only opposition to the Hoard comes from those interested in the three Canadian institutions which are holding examinations themselves." This statement is in keeping with the ho] general innuraiu e ilmplayed l)y Mr. M( l,c;iii ihrounhoiit his entire rcni.irk- al)lv cfl'iision. The leading nuisicians of (lanada are alniost tinaniiMously opposed t(i (lie ' pliilaiilliropy ' of llu- Assix iated Hoard, and among the Toronto ninnWors of '' o connnittci- vsliic h lias liciii appointed to take artion in preparing a protest with regard to these exaniinalioiis, are mk ii prominent mcmliers of the proltssion as Messrs. \V. Klliott Maslam, J. 1). A. Tripp ;iiid I'.dgar R. Howard, all private teachers and iiidepetidrnt of any iiuisk school. Surely Mr. ,\I( Lean miisi have gotten his information frouj Mr. Aitken, the honorary sei retary of the Asso< lated Hoard." Under no circumstances can the (orrespondence in (|UC8tion he construed as an invitation to the Associated Hoard on any such basis as is represented Wy the scheme which is now proposed to he forced upon the country. In view of the foregoing exposition of the facts in the case, the claim set up by Mr. Aitken and his Canadian agents, that the Associated Hoard had been invited to operate in Canada under conditions similar to those at present existing, fails in substantiation. INJUDICIOUS TACTICS. From the time of his first visit here in 1S97, Mr. Aiikcii, as lion. Sec. of the Ass()( iated Hoard has failed to (oiumand the ( dnfidencc of the musi- cal profession in Canada. The genuineness of his motives and the fairness of his |)oli<:y have been continuously held in (piestion by those even who enter- tain the highest regard for the eminent English musicians with whom Mr. Aitken, in his capacity as Hon. Sec. of the Associated Hoard, has the honor to associate. The following will serve to reveal Mr. Aitken's disposition towards the musical profession in C!aiiada, and also the injudicious and insulting tactics employed in his dealings with ihein. In a protracted communication to the G/obe, Feb, ^Hth, iSgy, Mr, Aitken says; "I have come from Kngland to t'anada to put this matter fairiy and S(iuarely before the Canadian pulilic. I have come to tell the truth, and, if possible, make other people tell the truth. "The Associated Hoard is not a money making concern, nor is it a dividend-distributing body. The Hoard has never visited any colony yet, except by invitation. In the case of Canada, that invitation was freely given for years past by the Canadian profession, and notably by gentlemen who are principals or proprietors (or those who represent them) of the trading institutions known as the Dominion College of Montreal, the Tor- onto College of Music and the Toronto Conservatory of Music. "Some of these gentlemen, for reasons best known to themselves, have altered their minds. That they have a perfect right to do, but they have no right to misrepresent the work and the motives of the Associated Board. No device has been too mean, no untruth too gross and no statement too spiteful to be made. It has been all along a pitiful display of interested prejudice and passion." In his reference to "trading institutions" Mr. Aitken ignores the fact that the opposition to his "philanthropic" endeavor is not by any means confined to our established musical institutions but embraces the musical profession as a whole. A glance at the signatures to the protest on pages 8, 9, 11 and 13 will suffice. It certainly would appear an ungraceful accusation on the part of Mr. Aitken against estaljlished Canadian schools of music, to class them as mere "trading concerns," when, according to his own admission, the R.A.M. and the R.C.M. have been reaping profits annually from the trivial local tests which are being exploited in Kngland and the Colonies under the name of Local Examinations. And again : "Now, what is the reason of all this opposition to the Associated Board ? I have no hesitation in saying that it resolves itself into two reasons : First, the fear of the loss of a few dollars to these trading and dividend-paying Concerns, ana, second, the fear of bad teaching being exposed. I regard the opposition as altogether insincere, and the methods which have l)een used in exploiting it as neither honest nor creditable. "I have heard of the document called the protest. I do not know whether to regard this as a piece of crass stupidity or as a piece of willful wickedness." The above reference to the professional musicians of this country and Mr. Aitken's rash criticisms of the gentlemen who constitute the Pro- testing Committee is highly cliaracteristic of the vindictive spirit so fre- quently manifested by the Hon. Secretary of the Associated Board in his communications to the Canadian press. Mr. Aitken continues : " It may interest many to know that the Dominion College of Mont- real now looks upon us with friendly eyes. Mr. Illsley, with whom I spent a day last week, has promised me to call together his committee to see whether they cannot in future make use of our examinations." At the time of writing the above Mr. Aitken appears to have been in ecstacies over the prospective affiliation of the Associated Board with at least one of these "trading and dividend-paying concerns." In a preceding paragraph in the same article Mr. Aitken, with childlike sim- plicity, refers to the Dominion College as a "trading and dividend-paying concern," ^ , . , ^ . A CONTRADICTION. Mr. Aitken's statement in the above quotation referring to the Dominion College of Music, etc., was denied by Mr. Illsley in the following telegram to Mr. S. T. Church, Hon, Secretary Protesting Committe. I23I MoNTUKAi., March 2iid, '99. " Emphatically untrue, l/oniinion College never made nor sanctioned such statement." Ii.i.si.kv, Registrar. Regarding the statements in the latter part f)f the same paiagraph, to the effect that Mr. Illsley had promised to call his committee together, Mr. Ulsley sent the following telegram to the Hon. Secretary of the Protesting Committee : MoNTRKAi,, March 9th, '99. *' Untrue. Aitken asked me to make proposition to Associated Hoard. I stated would speak to some of our men. We would stand l)y our own. Our men will have no connection. Writing." Ii.i.slev, Registrar. The following is an extract from a subsequent letter from Mr. Illsley, to Mr. Church, referring to the statements in cjuestion : '• I now find by a curious contortion he (referring to Mr. Aitken) is twisting my words to suit his own case. To make the statement that our committee would meet to discuss the (piestion of introducing these examin- ations is a very ingenious misrepresentation of the case. In other words, absolutely false. I hope you will be good enough to place the matter in its true light." REFLECTS ON MR. TORRINGTON. Mr. Aitken supplements his former attacks l)y a series of insinuations incorporated in a letter to the Toronto World, March 10th, thus reflecting upon the faculties of the Toronto College of Music and the Toronto Con- servatory of Music. Mr. Aitken asks : " Is it true that Mr. W. E. Fairclough's verdict in his e laminations at the Toronto College is revised and overruled by the director Mr. Torring- ton ? And would it be correct to say that these examinations are utider the control of the i)erson most deeply interested ? " Mr. Fairclough's straight denial : "Editor IVor/tf: Mr. .Samuel Aitken, Honorary Secretary, Associated Board, in a communication to T/ie World of yesterday's date, asks the following question : ' Is it true that Mr. W. E. Fairclough's verdict in his examinations at the Toronto College is revised and overruled by the director, Mr. Torrington ?' Permit me to say, in justice to Mr. Torrington, that it is absolutely untrue." W. E. Fairclough, F.R.C.O. Toronto, March 11, 1899. FURTHER REFLECTIONS. ■ " Again Mr. Aitken asks: " I . Is it, or '\t it not, true, that in the first week of February last, at the Toronto Conservatory, the pianoforte examiners were Dr. Fisher, Mr. Vogt l*4l and Mr. Harrison ? Is it true that these gentlemen went through the solemn farce of examining their own pupils, and awarding them certificates and diplomas ? " 2. Would it l)e true to say that at the June examinations of last year Mr. W. H. Sherwood, of Hoston, who was engaged, was personally engaged, paid, and controlled by Dr. Fisher, and does it invariably happen that Dr. Fisher's pupil secures the principal Conservatory gold medal for pianoforte playing ? "3. Would it be true to say that Signor Agramonte, who was vocal examiner last June, made a protest as to the inefficiency of the work of the candidates, proposed a more searching examination, but was overruled by Dr. Fisher, and the candidates allowed to pass ? "4. Is it true that Mr. J. Humfrey Anger, who teaches theory at the Conservatory, always sets the examination papers and examines the work of his own pupils, and is it correct that one of his pupils always takes the highest prize in harmony?" THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TORONTO CON- SERVATORY OF MUSIC REPLY. The following appeared recently in several of the daily papers. " It is a matter of regret that in the lengthy article which appeared in the issue of the World, of the loth inst., over the signature ot Samuel Aitken, Honorary Secretary, Associated Board, the writer should have gone out of his way to attack the character of the Toronto Conservatory of Music examinations. "The Conservatory Board might have passed the matter over, satisfied that the well-known standing of the Conservatory and its methods of exami- nations required no defence to such an unwarranted attack by a stranger; but they feel that coming from an agent who claims to represent such well- known gentlemen in England as those mentioned in his letter, the truth should be known for their benefit at least. "The answers to these questions are given in order: "I. The last mid-winter examinations were conducted by Dr. Fisher, Mr. Vogt and Mr. Harrison. Among the candidates was one pupil of Mr. Vogt and three of Mr. Harrison. No diplomas were awarded, the candidates being all of the Junior and Intermediate grades, the highest marks in each case being awarded to the pupils of one of our lady teachers. The professional and personal standing of the three gentlemen who com- posed this Board of examiners is such that the term <' solemn farce " as applied to their decision is wholly unwarranted. "2. Mr. W. H. Sherwood of Chicago has acted as examiner in the piano department (June examinations) since the first year of the Conservatory's existence. He is engaged l)y th° authority of the Board of Directors through the Secretary and is paid for his services by the Conservatory. Dr. Fisher exercises no control over Mr. Sherwood's examinations, as can easily be ascertained by asking Mr. Sherwood himself. It does not invari- ably happen that one of Dr. Fisher's pupils secures the gold medal in the piano department. [^5l '■:;.';■■ '■■'■.■''^' -v. TORONTO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC Cor. College St. and University Ave. DK. EDWARD FISHEK, Musicai. Director Affiliated with the UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO AND WITH TRINITY UNIVERSITY Students prepared as Teachers and Performers, also for positions in Colleges, Churches, and Concert Work. Artists' and Teachers' Graduating Courses, Scholarships, Diplomas, Certificates, Medals, etc. THE CONSERVATORY EXAMINATIONS IN TORONTO AND AT LOCAL CENTRES ARE OPEN TO ALL CANDIDATES WITHOUT RESTRICTION MANY FREE AnVANTAOES FOR STIDENTS, WHO MAY ENTER AT ANY TIME. CALENDAR r"^"""' HAILED FREE CONSERVATORY SCHOOL OF ELOCUTION Elocution, Oratory, Voice Culture, Province of Expression, Greek Art, Acting, Re- citation Orthoepy, Delsarte and Swedish Gymnastics, Literature, Etc. " 3. Signor Agramonte made no protest over the inefficieiicy of the candidates examined l)y him, and did not request that a more searching examination he made. On the contrary, the standard of marking adopted by Signor Agramonte was of a more lenient character, giving the candidates higher marks, than that to which we had been accustomed when the ex- aminers consisted of meml)ers of our own staff of teachers. This being the case there could be no proposition for Dr. Fisher to over-rule. "4. Mr. Anger certainly sets the papers for the Theory examinations, he being the principal theory teacher. In no case, however, do candidates attach their own names to their papers, they being known to the examiner only by numtiers which have been assigned by the Registrar. It frequent- ly happens that pupils of other teachers receive the highest numl)er of marks in their respective grades. In the case of candidates for the gold medal only those are eligible who have studied in the Conservatory for a period of at least one year. " In conclusion it is hardly necessary to say that the Board regrets the animus shown l)y Mr. Aitken in the above questions, and the tone and manner in which they are couched. The Conservatory examinations are such that we invite the fullest criticism into the methods employed and shall be glad to profit by any wise suggestions for their improvement. It is not too much to ask however, that criticism shall be honest and fair espec- ially as coming from one who claims to represent the best thought and feelings of the English Musical Societies. " By order of the Board of Directors of the Toronto Conservatory of Music." Hon. G. W. Allan, George J. Barclay, President. ' Secretary. AN UNANSWERED CHALLENGE. The Montrml Herald of Feb. 23rd, 1899, credits Mr. Ailketi with having made the following remarks during an interview with a reprenseta- tive of that journal regarding the manner in which some of the signatures to the protest were said to have been obtained. " I have a letter here which will, I think, rather open people's eyes to the way in which some, at any rate, of the signatures have been ol)tained. An eminent teacher of music in Canada says in this letter that I hold in my hand, that his name was appended to the protest without his consent and against his wishes." In reply to the above, Hon. Sec, S. T. Church, of the Protesting Committee, sent the following to the Toronto Globe, and also a similar communication to the Montreal Herald. " In reply to this imputation the signatures as attached to the various copies of the protest are open to inspection by the public attheofifice of the Honorary Secretary, 9 Pembroke street. I would challenge Mr. Aitken to produce the alleged testimony." [27I Ashdown's Music Store 88 YONGE STREET TORONTO E ARE prepared to attend promptly and carefully to the requirements of the musical public. We are Sole agents for the celebrated "Litolff'and "Ashdown" Editions, '^Lutc" Anthems and Part Songs, and represent in Canada the leading English and American publishers. PETERS EDITION, SCHIRMER & WOOD EDITIONS AND NOVELLO MUSIC ALWAYS IN STOCK. . . SPECIAL DEPOT FOR THE CELEBRATED COMPO- SITIONS OF MME. CHAMINADE OUR FAVORITE BOOKS Modern Pianist, (a collection of 33 pieces) price, 75c. Repertoire Moderne, (32 pieces) price $1.00 Pianist's Album, (31 pieces) price ..... $1.00 Koehler's Practical Pianoforte - Method, price 7Sc. NEW SONGS [In keys to suit ail Volcei] Beneath tlie Union Jack, (Sullivan) 60c. Little Grenadier, The (Bonheur), 60c. Ensign, The (Barri) . . . . 60c. Forging the Anchor, (Wodney) . 50c. Two Roses, (Valmore) . . . 50c. Songof the Flowers, (Vivien) . 60c. Dance and a Dream, A (Gerald Lane) .... .' . 50c. From the Red Rose, (Carmicliael) 50c. Special Rates to Teachers, Schools and Colleges. Send for Catalogues and Terms. Allhouj^h several weeks have elapsed since ihc alxne clialleiiye was given, no evidence in support of Mr. Aitken's assertion lias lieen forth- coming. PRESS COMMENTS AND CRITICISMS. Extract from London Truthy Nov. 20th, i8g8 : " When Trinity College, Toronto, attempted to ff)ist /;/ (ibxentia musical degrees upon this country, the protests of British musicians, headed l)y the University officials, were loud and strong. Nobody took a more prominent part in the agitation against the importation of these ('anadian degrees then the musical chiefs of the Associated Hoard and of Trinity College, London. For these institutions, therefore, to attempt, without proper consultation with the colonial musicians, to introduce their examin- ations for the purpose of disseminating in abwiitia British degrees and diplomas through Canada, is something very much akin to that which has Ijeen described as a pure piece of British cheek." In the same article Mr. Torrington's letter to the Globe Oct. 27th, 1898, and which appears in another column, is largely ([uoted from and also referred to as " extremely proper and moderate." Extract from a subsequent issue of London Truth : "I am now informed upon good authority (and the fact will doul)tless be interesting to the Trinity College Examiner who sends me l)y registered post a twelve-page letter, the drift of which I cannot quite gather) that Trinity College, London, recognizing the error of judgment which has been made, have resolved at once to withdraw their scheme, and, accordingly, unless they are expressly invited to Canada to examine for musical diplomas — an invitation which under present circumstances is hardly likely to be issued — they will leave Canada altogether out of their operations. I heart- ily congratulate Trinity College, London. To err is human, but to with- draw from an untenable position, though it requires more courage, is an act of wisdom which the public are quick to appreciate and applaud. The AssociatedjBoard would do well to follow this excellent example without the slightest further delay." INVITED RIDICULE. The Musical Herald, of London, Eng., says regarding Mr. Aitken's aggregation of "philanthropy," "imperial federation," "missionary ven- ture," and scholarships. "Mr. Aitken has invited ridicule l)y writing a letter to the Canadian papers in which he speaks of 'philanthropy,' 'imperial federation,' and 'missionary venture.' Canadians naturally resent this sort of thing. The fact, of course, is that the Associated Board is a highly lucrative concern for the professors, composers, and publishers engaged. Australia and South Africa seem to have caught the examination fever. It must be left to pub- h9i . ;■ ;■ lie opinion whether Canada is to do the same, and if so, whether its own universities cannoi undertake the duty of exaniiiiin^. I'he matter of ' srholar^hips,' it might be added, is not l)y any means as unselfish or phil- anthropic an enter|)rise as appears on the surface, a fact which is well under- stood hy the initiated." CONTROVERSY NOT PROVOKED BY CANADIANS. The following extract from an article ap[)earing in the lj>mhn Musical Ilcnildy and dealing with a report of the first meeting of Canadian musicians held in Toronto to protest against the invasion of the Dominion by outside musical examining bodies, makes clear the fact that Canadians did not pro- voke the present controversy, "The meeting was almost, hut not entirely, unanimous against the Associated Moard scheme for Canada. Trinity College, London, has sent out Dr. Charles X'incent to view the land, and the Toronto Su/iin/tiv Xi^ht says that he will favor the withdrawal of Trinity College from Canada, But it must be admitted that the controversy was provoked from this side. Canada is an old colony, much less in touch with '''nglish ways than Aus- tralasia and the Cape, ('anadian musicians are certamly entitled to work out their own problems in their own way." Loudon Truth thus refers to the "mulish obstinacy" of the Associated Board : " The Associated Hoard, together with the Hoard of Trinity College, London, started some time ago the idea of holding musical examinations in Canada. So strong was the prejudice in the Dominion against the imported diplomas, that Trinity College, London, very properly withdrew their scheme. The Associated Hoard, however, have, with mulish obstinacy, persisted in their scheme, though it has i)een perfectly obvious from the outset that the Canadians have boycotted the ex uninations, and are likely to continue to do so. Why, therefore, the Hoard do not withdraw as wisely and as grace- fully as Trinity College, London, have done, is a matter for surprise. The heads of the Associated Board objected to the importation of examinations and diplomas from Trinity College, Toronto, and they have no right what- ever to attempt to force their own examinations and diplomas upon the Canadians." A CORNER IN MUSIC. The Associated Board's Canadian sheet music traffic and its coercive policy in order to control the trade here, is dwelt upon in Toronto Saturday Night, Mar, nth, 1899 : " Local music dealers express themselves as highly amused at the explanation offered by the Associated Board regarding that enterprising concern's 'corner' in its Canadian sheet music traffic. One dealer has explained that the Board's efforts to coerce and control the trade are due to the fact that, in anticipation of a tremendous rush for its music, a very large stock of the same was imported from England upon which duty and [30] expressa^e have hecn paid, and as this in all prfihahilily figures as an asset, Mr. Aitie officials of tlje Asiociatcd Hoard have reason to l»e heartily ashamed of it : ' DiAK Siks.-'i'he Asso< iated Hoard intend conlrollinn in Canada the sale ol the piano music for its examinations next year, and no piano music will be ohtainahle except lhrou(;h the Moard. I'-ach list of music in the syllahus \ and M will be l»ound in a se|>aiate book, and will be sold by the Hoard to music sellers for thirty cents per copy. I shall be ^lad to know if you are inclined to give an order for this music, and how niany copies.' "Candidates for the Hoard's examinations and dealers will have to buy the Hoard's examination piano music through the Hoard, "Small wonder that the Canadians refuse to believe the Associated Hoard ol the Royal Academy and Royal College of .Music to be actuated by 'art' motives, or by any other motives than those of the huckster. I won- der, by the way, what Sir .Arthur Sullivan, who is a member of the Hoard, thinks of the recent exposes." NO DISLOYALTY. Editorial, New York Mnsutil Courier, Dec, yth, 1898 : "In this protest there is no disloyalty. Canadian musicians are thoroughly educated, and they are progressive, capable and independent. By resisting such things as, in their belief, would lend to lower their ideals and lessen their aml)itions ; by developing the best in self and country, and thus preserving individuality and originality ; by illustrating that the greatest Hritish colony has a musical heritage of its own, they do the belter prove their loyalty. "Concerning the whole matter there is only one statement which this paper need make : iMiglish examinations are not needed in Canada." MR. AITKEN'S MODUS OPERANDI. The following reference to the honorary secretary of the Associated Board appeared in the Canadian corres|)ondence of the Miisiail Courier, March 22nd, 1899. "Since his arrival in Canada (about the middle of last month), Mr. Aitken's modus operuufli has been one of various indiscreet blunders, attacks l33l • Ill tlie iiuiHii al iinircHHi'iii, apnIo^icH, Hii|i|>li( atKiiu, luKe Ntatviiiciits, iiu iiiiciuioeN, iiisiniintiiMis, and vitiiperoiiH (ensure, nil of whirl) have been met liy the prDtcstinK Musicians, m ihi- press and otherwise, in a fair lint emphatic manner." A FRENCH-CANADIAN VIEW. Just liDW deeply iiii|iresse(l ihe Irem h C.inailians are with the " phil- anthropic " aspect of till- Asso( i.ited Hoard's mission to C'anada, may lie estnnated hy the followitij< extract (rom an artit le ni a recent iuiml)er of /.(/ /'»■///«• A'fviw, Montreal : " Do they lei^;n make us heliese that Mr. |. Itayne M( f.ean, however Hallant a colonel he may lie, has his fmyer in the |)ie f( iated Hoard ioinewhat sharply, roiiu's iii for vulvar aluise. And of < onrsi- Mr. ^()rril)^■ Ion IN the ((cnerni simid^c of inii|inty with whu h this odviitii e a^cnt eii- dcavofN to cover the desiKnt of hin employers." MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE. HIS EXCELLENCY'S OPINION. 'I'lic opiniiiii of Ills Ivxccllcin y the (lovcrimr (lencral of(-'aiiaiUi regard- in^ the l^roU'st is expressed in the following extract from a letter received by Hon. Sec, S. T. I'hurch, of the I'rotestiiin Connnittce, from His Kxceilency's Sec'y, Major L. Ci. Drummond ; " His ICxiellcni y icgrets that he cannot accejit the views expressed in the protest. The repiii.ilion a. Kxtinits from Letter to 07oA<>, Ocl. 19lli, from Mr. J. R. McLean 18 Mr. K. II. Ti>rrin){li)ir't Reply 14 .Mr. J. lluinlVey Aiigi-i s Ui-pjy , 17 Mr. Percival J. IlUley's Ktpiy 19 Further Comments on .Mr. Mrl.can's Lrtlor 20 iNjiimioi s Taiius. KxtractN from Letter to Toronio n Mr. 'i'>irrin)(ton 24 Mr. W. v.. Kairulough's DtMiial 24 I'urllier UeHection on Toronio CoiiMervalory of Musio 24 Mo.'iril of Directors of Toronto Conservatory of .Musii' Reply 25 An Unanswered ChalleiiKt* 27 Prkss Commknis anp Criihisms. Extracts from London Tiuth, .Nov. auih, 18'JH 29 KxtracI from London Musical Ilernid : " Invited Ridicule." 29 Extract from London iV;/.«/V(// //fz-rt/rf: "Controversy not Provoked by Canadians !J(» Toronto Sulimlav Xiglil, .Mar. I lili, 189!> : " Corner in Music." ... 80 London Truth, Feb. '2nd : " Board's Control of Piano Music." 88 New York Afii.tini/ Couru-r, Dec. 7lli, 1898 : " .No Disloyalty." 88 New N'ork Musutii Courier, Mar. 2'2nd, 1899: "Mr. Aitken's Modus Operandi. " 88 ■ Extract from /.« I'etite Re-vut : " A French-Canadian View." 84 Winnipeg Daily Tribune : " Runs ' .Amtick ' with Mis Pen." .... 84 MiSC'HI.I.ANKOIS CllRRKSl'ONDENC'K, His Excellency's t^pinion 86 X'arious Comments on His Kxcellency's Letter to Hon. Sec. S. T. Church. . . .4,') A Pungent Reply to Mr. Aitken's " Sneering Allusion ",.... 87 From an Australian Musician 89 A Comprehensive Resolution 89 Sound Advice 40 The Guinea Registration Muddle 4h Dr. Vincent Decidedly linpre'.-.i I 41 Advised to " Stand Out Boldly " 41 Dr. Harris Suggests Provincial Examinations 41 " United We Stand, Divided We Fall. " Letter from Mr. J. E. P. Aldous. . . 48 The Stronger Protest 43 Associated Musicians of Ontario 44 Mr. Aitken's Continied Onslaught 44 Brief Review 46