The Church of England : 
 
 ITS CONTINUOUS ORGANIC LIFE, 
 AND ITS CATHOLIC RESTORATION. 
 
 A^ LTilCTURlil 
 
 DELIVERED 
 
 Before the CHURCH OF ENGLAND INSTITUTE, HALIFAX, 
 
 AND SUBSEQUENTLY 
 
 In MONTREAL and SHERBROOKE, Province of Quebec, 
 
 AND IN ' 
 
 WINDSOR, Nova Scotia, 
 By thr RKV. ISAAC 3ROCK:, D.D., 
 
 RCCTOR OF HORTON ANO CANON OF ST. LUKE'S CATHEDRAL, HAL{F*X. 
 
 Ecclcsia Atujlicaiut Libera Sit." 
 
 MAGNA CHARTA, A.D. UMS. 
 
 TO WHICH IS APPENDED A SERMON, 
 
 . Bv I'HE SAME Author, on 
 THE THREE-FOLD APOSTOLIC MINISTRY 
 OF THE HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH, 
 
 PRCACK^D IN ST. JAMES' CHUnCH. KENTVILLC, N. S., 
 ON SUNDAY, OCTOBER II, 1BD1. 
 
 hi'. 
 
 MORTON Si CO.. ■ 
 143 BARRINOTON STKERT. HALIFAX. 
 A. I). 1 89 1. 
 
 [Pn're 12 cefiis.^ 
 
p, 
 
 The Church orENGLSND/^ 
 
 ITS CONTINUOUS ORGANIC LIFE, 
 AND ITS CATHOLIC RESTORATION. 
 
 A. LECTURE 
 
 DELIVERED 
 
 Before the CHURCH OF ENGLAND INSTITUTE, HALIFAX, 
 
 AND SUBSEQUENTLY 
 
 In MONTREAL and SHERBROOKE, Province of Quebec, 
 
 AND IN 
 
 WINDSOR, Nova Scotia, 
 By the RKV. ISAAC BROCK:, D.D., 
 
 HECTOR OF HORTON AND CANON OF ST. LUKE'S CATHEDRAL, HALIFAX. 
 
 EccUsia AnylicaiiM Libera Sit.^' 
 
 MAGNA CHARTA, A.D. 12tS. 
 
 TO WHICH IS APPENDED A SERMON, 
 
 By the same Author, on 
 
 THE THREE-FOLD APOSTOLIC MINISTRY 
 OF THE HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH, 
 
 PRCACHEO IN ST. JAMES' CHURCH, KENTVILLC, N. •.. 
 ON •UNOAV, OCTOBER t1. laSI. 
 
 MORTON & CO.. 
 143 BARRINGTON STREET. HALIFAX. 
 
 A. D. 189 1. 
 [Fria 12 cen/s.] 
 

PREFACE. 
 
 This Lecture is published at llie request of many who heard it, and 
 who thought that it would prove helpful to those members of our Church 
 who have neither the time nor the inclination to peruse those Histories of 
 the Church of England which set forth at length the matter brought into 
 a small compass in this Lecture, If it removes from any minds an error 
 fostered by our Common School Histories, that the Church of England is 
 the child of the Reformation, its publication will not have been in vain. 
 
 The nature of the subject handled admitted only the briefest reference 
 to the Early British Church. The author refers to Lane's Illustrated 
 Notes, vol. 1., and to " Little's Reasons for Being a Churchman," for 
 further information on this interesting subject. 
 
 Reference is made in the Lecture to the beginning of schism from the 
 English branch of the Holy Catholic Church : the beginning came from 
 Rome : the Puritan schism (the parent of modern dissent from the 
 Catholic Church in England) quickly followed. t)n this subject, see 
 Lane's Illustrated Notes, vol. II. 
 
 A Sermon containing a seven-fold argument for the Three-fold Min- 
 istry of the Holy Catholic Church, recently preached in St. James' Church, 
 Kentville, is added. It is an attempt to present a somewhat difficult 
 subject in a popular form, in a form, that is, which will take hold of the 
 mind of people in general. 
 
 This Pamphlet can be had at the rate of $1.00 for ten copies, or $2,00 
 for twenty-five copies (both rates including postage), on application to the 
 author or the publishers. Any profits arising from the sale of this Pam- 
 phlet will be given to Guild of St. James' Church, Kentville. 
 
 The Rectory, Kentville, Nova Scotia, 
 October 31, 1891. 
 
DATES REFERRED TO IN THE LECTURE. 
 
 I. EARLY BHITISH PERIOD. 
 
 A. D. 304 (June 17)... Martyrdom of St. Alban. 
 
 314 Council of Aries: three British Bishops 
 
 present. 
 
 II. ANGLO-SAXON PERIOD. 
 
 A. D. 597 Mission of St. Augustine to Kent. 
 
 635 St. Aidan of lona, Bishop of Norlhumbria. 
 
 604 Synod of Whitby. 
 
 GG8-690 Episcopate of Tiieodore, 7lh Archbishop of 
 
 Canterbury. 
 G78 Division by Theodore of the Diocese ol 
 
 Northumbria. 
 Wilfrid's appeal to Rome. 
 
 090-800 The golden age of the Anglo-Saxon Church, 
 
 800 Coronation of Charlemagne at St. Peter's, 
 
 Rome. 
 871-901 Reign of Alfred the Great. 
 
 in. ANGLO-NORMAN PERIOD. 
 
 A. D. 1066 The Battle of Senlac. 
 
 1070 Lanfranc Archbishop of Canterbury. 
 
 1081 Conflict between Gregory VII. and Lanfranc. 
 
 1164 Constitutions ol Clarendon. 
 
 J215 (Jun. 15).. .The Magna Charla. 
 
 1351 The Stalrite of Provisors. 
 
 1353 The Statute of Praemunire. 
 
 1378-1417 Rival Popes, 
 
 IV. REFORMATION PERIOD. 
 
 A.D. 1534 Abolilton of Papal Supremacy in England. 
 
 1549 First Prayer-Book of Edward VI. 
 
 1552 Second " " " 
 
 1558 (Nov. 17)... Accession of Queen Elizabeth. 
 
 1559 (Doc. 17)...Consecration of Parker, 69lh Archbishop of 
 
 Canterbury. 
 1570 The Bull of Pope Pius V. commenced ther 
 
 work of schism from the Holy Catholic 
 
 Chnrcb in England. 
 1662 Final Revision, after the Savoy Conferencey 
 
 of the English Book of Common Prayer. 
 S890(.Nov. 21)...The judgment of the Archbishop of Canter- 
 
 bwry in the case of the Bishop of Lincoln, 
 
THE CHURCH OP ENGLAND: 
 
 ;■ - I. ITS CONTINUOUS AND ORGANIC LIFE: 
 
 II. AND ITS CATHOLIC RESTORATION. 
 
 My motto, which will serve to iutrorluce both divisions of my 
 subject, is found in the first and last sentences of the Magna Charta, 
 signed at Ruunymede, near Windsor, by King John and the Barons 
 of England, headed by Stepheji Langtou, Archbishop of Canterbury, 
 on June 15, llil5. 
 
 " ECCLESIA ANGLICANA LIBERA SIT." 
 
 "The Church of England shall be free." These words, I say, 
 bear on both divisions of my present subject. They witness to the 
 continuous organic life of the Church of England. For how was 
 our national Church spoken of in our national Charta 1 Was it 
 spoken of as the Holy Roman Church, or as the Church of Rome lu 
 England 1 Nay : it was then as now known to Englishmen by its 
 distinctive national name — 
 
 ECCLESIA ANGLICANA 
 
 then ; and think what a time that was ! Verily it seemed the very 
 darkest hour of England's Nation, and England's Church. 
 
 'Twas high tide at the Vatican. The forged decretals of Isidore, 
 and the gigantic genius of Hildebrand had consolidated that fabric 
 of papal despotism, which has been growing since the memorable 
 year A. D. 606, when the Emperor Phocas, a tyrant and a murderer, 
 placed on the brow of Pope Boniface III. the mitre of the universal 
 Episcopate ; the assumption of which his illustrious predecessor, 
 Gregory the Groat, had taught would be a mark of " the forerunner 
 of Anti-Christ." 
 
e 
 
 Only three years before tlie siguing of ilio Magna Charta, King 
 Jolm had surrendered his crown to Pandulpli, Legato of Vope 
 Innocent III. ; lie had become the Pope's man, \m serf; Enghmd 
 liad become a fief of the Papacy ; and England's Church seemed 
 utterly at the mercy of the foreign tyrant ; but even then, in the 
 eyes of hor patriot Archbishop and Barons, she was " Ecclesia 
 Anglicana." 
 
 And even then, when the iron heel of the foreign despot and 
 usurpfcr was crushing her to the ground, came the words twice 
 repeated in the great Charta of our national freedom : " Ecclesia 
 Anglicana libera sit;" " The Chnrch of Enj^land shall be free." 
 
 Surely they were a prophecy, unconscious no doubt, of that work 
 Catholic Restoration, would bo carried out three centuries later, 
 ■when England's Church regained her primitive and her rightful 
 freedom. 
 
 I.-First: THE CONTINUOUS ORGANIC LIFE OF THE CHURCH OF 
 
 ENGLAND. 
 
 And ichen did the Church of England as a unit begin to have an 
 organic life? 
 
 There was a flourishing Church in ancient Britain long before it 
 got the name of England. By whom founded we do not know. 
 When founded we c£iunot certainly tell. That Chuich of ancient 
 Britain has left its mark in our Prayer Book of to-day ; for in our 
 calendar we find on June 17, the name of St, Alban, proto-martyr 
 of the British Church. That ancient Church emerges from the 
 obscurity which surrounds its origin into the clear day-light of 
 history A. D. 314, at the Council of Aries in Southern France, whose 
 decrees were signed by throe Bishops from Britain — Restitutus of 
 London, Eborius of York, and Adelphius Civitatis Colonise, which is 
 supposed to be Caerlonon-Usk in North Wales. 
 
 The Sf -von invasion drove this ancient British Church, with its 
 bishops, priests and deacons, back into the western parts of the Island, 
 Wales and Cornwall, where it lived to confer through its bishops 
 with Augustine, at the opening of the seventh century, and through 
 them to protest against his claims, and those of the bishops of Rome 
 who sent him. 
 
Memoral)lo is that first protest of the Church of nncient Britain ; 
 inetnorablo a« the fore-runner of many another protest which our 
 national Church would be constrained to enter against the unscriptural 
 and un-catholic claims of Rome in later centuries. 
 
 That protest of the British Bishops assembled at Bangor, ran on 
 this wise : 
 
 " Be it known and declared that we all individually and collec- 
 tively are in all humility prepared to ilefer to the Church of God, 
 and the Bishop of Home, and to every sincere and godly Christian, so 
 far as to love every one according to his degree in perfect charity, 
 and to assist them all by word and deed in becoming the children of 
 God. But as for any other obedience we know of none, that ho, 
 whom yon term Pope, or Bishop of Home, can demand. The defer- 
 ence we have mentioned wo are ready to pay him, as to every other 
 (christian, but in all other respects our obedience is duo to the 
 jurisdiction of the Bishop of Caerlon, who is alone, under God, tho 
 ruler to keep us right in the way of salvation." 
 
 Very modest Avere claims of Augustine, and of the illustrious 
 Gregory the Great, Bishop of Rome, who sent him to the heathens 
 of Saxon England; very modest, as compared with those of Hildebrand, 
 or Innocent III., but even these modest claims the Bishops of the 
 ancient Chuich of Britain were not prepared to admit. 
 
 •.; To proceed. 
 
 ,; There were Churches in Saxon. England in the seventh century. 
 
 There was the Church founded by St. Augustine, sent by 
 Gregory, Bishop of Rome, whose centre was Canterbury, and whoso 
 sphere of operation was south-eastern England — the Church of 
 the Italian Missions. 
 
 There was the Church founded by St. Aidan and his devoted 
 fellow missionaries from lona, sent by the Abbot of lona, whose 
 centre was Lindisfarne, and whose spheres of operation were northern 
 and central England, the great kingdoms of North urabria and 
 Mercia — the Church of the Celtic Missions.* 
 
 * Three-fifths of England WHS ovntieclizeJ by rni?si«nnrics who owned no connexion 
 whntever with the See of Rome. Tho iiuthority for this statement is the Roman Ciitholio 
 histurinn, Montiilainbert. See his " Monks of the West." The late Bishop Lightfoot. in 
 his '* Lenders in the Northern Church." uses this expression: " Augustine was the Apostle 
 of Kent, Aidan was the Apostle of England." 
 
8 
 
 And as we have already seen, there was the ancient British Church 
 in Wales and Cornwall. 
 
 Very trifling differences of ritual aiid custom, more serious 
 differences of race, kept apart these different branches of Christ's 
 Holy Catholic Church in England : but while they remained apart, 
 the national Church of England, the Church of England, as a unit in 
 the land, had not began her history ; and therefore it is too early to 
 speak of her continuous organic life. 
 
 When did that continuous organic life begin ] To leave out of 
 view for the present the British Church in Wales, which came at a 
 later period into union with the Church of England, when did the 
 Churches of the Italian and Celtic Missions begin to be fused into one 
 united Church of England 1 
 
 The first step toward that union was taken at the Synod of 
 Whitby, in Northumbria, A. D. 664. 
 
 Oswy, King of Northumbria, had been educated at lona ; but his 
 Queen, Eanfleda, daughter of Edwin and Ethelberga. had been edu- 
 cated at Canterbury. Hence on the Northumbrian throne the 
 traditions and the ritual of lona and Canterbury were represented. 
 
 That Synod decided for the observance of Easter at the time 
 decreed by the Nicene Canons, and in other matters also decided that 
 the Church of the Celtic Missions in England should conform to the 
 usages prevailing in the great Church of Western Europe. 
 
 That Synod of the Church of North umbria showed that union 
 was desired and thought desiraWe by many in authority in the 
 Church, and in the northern kingdom of the Heptarchy. 
 
 But to bring about that union as a fact in the then divided king- 
 doms of Saxon England was another matter. To effect this, the 
 Churches of Kent and Northumbria needed a man of commanding 
 genius and dominating will. 
 
 God sent the man, who was to be the second founder and the 
 real organizer of the Church of England. He came from a city 
 dear to every Christian heart, Tarsus of Cilicia, the bitth-place of St. 
 Paul. 
 
 The whole circumstances connected with the consecration of 
 Theodore of Tarsus, to be the seventh Archbishop of Canterbury, 
 indicate the over-ruling piovidence of God, who, at the right moment 
 
9 
 
 sent the lijiht man, to blend into one organized Church of England 
 the Churches of the Italian and Celtic Missions. 
 
 Theodore of Tarsus was cont-'ecrated at Rome to be Archbishop 
 of Canterbury in March, 668. He was 66 years of age at the time 
 of his consecration. Ho died Sept. 19, 690. Those twenty-two 
 years of the Episcopate of Archbishop Theodore witness the blending 
 into one Church of England under the metropolitan throne of 
 Canterbury, the scattered and isolated Missions sent from Rome and 
 lona, which had largely accomplished the evangelization of England. 
 
 Archbishop Theodore was recognized sis a public blessing by the 
 kings and people of England ; and according to Bede he was the first 
 Archbishop of Canterbury to whom all England submitted. 
 
 How this born ruler of men, with vist practical and administrative 
 ability, and with resolute will, made himself felt as the rightful 
 chief- ijastor of the several Churches and Missions of England; hc.v 
 he succeeded in moulding them 'uto unity under the metropolitan See 
 of Canterbury, it would take too long to tell. 
 
 Suffice it to say that the Church of England, as we know it to-day, 
 in its diocesan and parochial organization, was mainly the work of 
 Archbishop Theodore. 
 
 And, as Green has poiiit-c-d out in his History of the English 
 people, Theodore did unconsciously a pcUtical work for England, 
 and helped forward that unity ol the nation wlach was reached about 
 a century and a half later under Egbert. 
 
 " The single throne of the one primate at Canterbury, accustomed 
 men's minds to the thought of a single throne for their one temporal 
 over-lord. The regular subordination of priest to bishop, of bishop 
 to primate in ihe administration of the Church, supplied a mould on 
 which the civil organization of the State quietly shaped itself. Above 
 all, the councils gathered by Archbishop Theodore were the first of 
 our national gatherings for general legislation. It was at a much 
 later period that the wise men of Wessex, or Northumbria, or Mercia, 
 learned to come together in the Parliament of all England." 
 
 It would be interesting to dwell on such an era as the Episcopate 
 of Theodore forms in the history of the Church of England. But 
 time forbids. 
 
10 
 
 One question only I should like to ask and to answer beforo 
 passing on. What was the relation of the Church of England in her 
 newly organized unity to the Church of Rome, and to the l5ishop of 
 Eome t The Church of England was in full communion, no doubt, 
 with the gi'oat Church of Western Europe ; and grateful to Rome 
 England's Church must have been, not only for Augustine, but also 
 more recently for Theodore. 
 
 But did communion and gratitude imply sN?)?niss inn? That is 
 the question. Have we any means of answering this qupstion f 
 
 Providentially we have. At the request of the King and Queen of 
 Northumbria, Theodore, as Primate of all England, determined to 
 divide the extensive Diocese of Northumbria, of which the celebrated 
 Wilfrid was then Bishop. Theodore decided on this important step 
 without con.sulting Wilfrid : of course this was neither just nor con- 
 siderate. A few years beforo the saintly and humble-minded Chad, 
 Bishop of Lichfield (whose name you will find in your Prayer Book), 
 had submitted to the imperious will of Theodore, in his transference 
 from York to Ljchfield. But Wilfrid of York was a very difierent 
 man from Chad of Lichtiekl. He was not going tamely to submit to 
 the ruling of his Primate, backed though it was by the decision of 
 his Sovereign. 
 
 What did he do'? A thing unheard of before in English history : 
 he appealed to Rome. He went himself to the Eternal City and 
 laid his cause before the Bishop of Rome, who !»ummoned a council 
 of fifty bishops, who decided in Wilfrid's favour, and ordered that 
 he should be reinstated in his Diocese as it existed before its division 
 by Archbishop Theodore. 
 
 Elated with his success, Wilfrid returned to England in the 
 spring of A. D. 680, bearing with him a letter from the Bishop of 
 Rome, to which was attached the Bull, or leaden seal of the Pontiff, 
 which was in his eyes a banner of victory, but which in the eyes of 
 the Church of Northumbria was only a provocation and an insult. 
 
 The king of Northumbria convened a council of the clergy and 
 laity of his realm, and then, instefxd of confirnring the decree of the 
 Bishop of Rome, they decided that the action of Wilfrid in appealing 
 to Rome against the ruling of the English Primate and the North- 
 umbrian King wa» a public offence, and Wilfrid for thi.'; oflFence was, 
 
11 ■ 
 
 by the decision of tlie King and his council, thrown into prison. I 
 do not justify their action, I simply state the fact. 
 
 The papal mandate declared an everlasting anathema against any 
 one who should resist the decree, ordering the immediate ve-instate- 
 nient of Wilfrid in his original Diocese and summoning Archbishop 
 Theodore to a council at Kome. Theodore showed his independence 
 of the Bishop of Kome by obeying neither order : he did not re-in- 
 state Wilfrid in his Diocese, neither did he attend the council. 
 
 In the first century of her history then, the Church of England, 
 while in full communion with Kome and grateful to her chief Pastor, 
 was not prepared to yield submission to Rome. The supremacy of 
 the Bishop of Rome was not acknowledged by the Church of England 
 when she began her organized life as a unit under the Metropolitan 
 Throne of Canterbury. 
 
 Two centuries from the times of Theodore bring us to the reign 
 of the greatest of the Saxon kings of England — Alfred. 
 
 A few years ago an incident occurred in England which showed 
 the legal identity of the Church of England in the days of Alfred and 
 Victoria. 
 
 In the days of King Alfred the Church of England leased to the 
 Crown a property on a lease of 999 years. A few years ago that 
 lease expired, and the property reverted to the body that originally 
 gave the lease, the Church of England ; thus showing the identity, 
 the identity in law, of the Church of England in the reign of Queen 
 Victoria, with the Church of England in the reign of King Alfred : 
 and thus witnessing to the continuous organic life of the Church of 
 England through 1000 years of her history. 
 
 Archbishop Theodore died September 19, 690. We are living in 
 the yea.' of our Lord 1891. 'Tis therefore just over 1200 years since 
 the death of that seventh Ajchbishop of Canterbury, who was the 
 second founder and the real organizer of the Church of England. 
 
 During those 1200 years the Church of England, sharing the 
 fortunes of the Nation of England, has gone through many vicissi- 
 tudes. But the changes of 1200 years have not impaired her identity, 
 have not destroyed her organic life, which has continuously existed 
 
since the days whon tho Greek Theodore brouglit the Churches <ind 
 Missions of Saxon England into organic unity under the Metropolitan 
 Throne of Canterbury. 
 
 I will briefly glance atsnnie of these changes. 
 
 The 110 years following thu death of Archbishop Theodore bring 
 us to a year very memorable in European history, A. D. 800. 
 
 On Christmas Day, A. D. 800, the proudest nobles and prelates 
 of Italy and France were gathered round the high altar in the grand 
 Basilica of St. Peter's Rome. In the centre of the throng is a giant 
 figure whose dome-shaped brow and flashing eye mark a great mind 
 and heart. Clad in the long robe of a Roman patrician, he kneels 
 on the steps of the altar and bows his head in prayer ; then, as if by 
 a sudden inspiration from above. Pope Leo III. advances to the 
 kneeling King an J places on his head a golden crown : th« multitude 
 in St. Peter's, with loud acclamation.^, hail him as Cresar and 
 Augustus Pope Leo III. has revived the empire of the West, and 
 its crown is sparkling on the brow of ('harlemagne. 
 
 This incident was one, says Archbishop Trench, of profoundest 
 significance. It is not too much to affirm that it is the hinge upon 
 which the whole history of Western Christendom turned for long 
 centuries to come. 
 
 May we venture to connect that scene in St. Peter's, Rome, on 
 Christmas day, A. D. 800, with tho history of our Church in England ? 
 I think wo may. Who was the friend and adviser of that mighty 
 Emperor ? One of England's foremost scholars, Alcuin of York. 
 
 The 110 vears from the death of Theodore to the coronation of 
 Charlemagne, constitute the golden ago of the Church in Anglo- 
 Saxon England. 
 
 Then England was famous among European nations for her 
 scholars. Witness such names as Aldhehn, Bishop of Sherborne, 
 and the venerable Bede, translator of the Gospels into Anglo Saxon, 
 and the father of our ecclesiastical history ; and Egbert, Archbishop 
 of York, and his illustrious scholar, Alcuin, whom Charlemagne 
 summoned to his court, when he would revive the almost extinguished 
 literature of France. 
 
 And then, too, England's Church was preeminently a mission- 
 ary Church : witness the successful labors among the Franks and 
 
18 
 
 Teutons of Willibrord of Northnmbria, the Apostle of Frisia, and 
 Winfrul of Crediton, near Exeter, better known as St. Boniface, the 
 Apostlo of Germany. 
 
 This golden age of the Church of Anglo-Saxon England wita 
 succeeded by a long ])eriod of religious, intellectual, and political 
 darkness, caused by the successive invasions of the Danes, a heathen 
 people from Scandinavia, who ravaged the land, rjbbed and perse- 
 cuted the Church. 
 
 Alfred's brilliant reign of 30 years, from A. D, 871 to 901, 
 checked for a time the ravages of these fierce pirates of the North, 
 settled many of them permanently in England, and led their chiefs 
 and many of their followers to embrace Christianity. 
 
 I might profitably linger on the beautiful story of all that Alfred 
 •was. Green says : " Alfred was the noblest as ho was the most com- 
 plete embodiment of all that is great, and all that is loveabl* in the 
 English temper," 
 
 And I might profitably dwell on all that Alfred did for the Nation 
 and Church of England, but I must be content to refpr you to the 
 pages of the gifted historian from whom I have just quoted. 
 
 Before, however, I pass on to the eventful times of William the 
 Norman, let us take away with us, from the pages of Green, his 
 estimate of the character of the greatest and best of our Saxon kings. 
 
 " Eeligion was the ground-work of Alfred's character. His 
 temper was instinct with piety. Everywhere throughout his writings 
 that remain to us, the name of God, and the thought of God, stir him 
 to outbursts of ecstatic adoration. But he was no mere saint. He 
 felt none of that scorn of the world about him which drove the 
 nobler souls of his day to monastery or hermitage. Vexed as he 
 was by sickness and constant pain, his temper took no touch of 
 nsceticism. His rare geniality, a peculiar elasticity and mobility of 
 nature, gave color and charm to his life." 
 
 I pass now from Anglo-Saxon to Anglo-Norman times. 
 
 The battle fought at Senlac, near Hastings, on Oct. 14, 1066, 
 which gave the realm of England to William the Norman, did not 
 destroy the ancient Church of England, did not touch or impair her 
 
14 
 
 continuous organic life ; but it was the beginning of a mighty revo- 
 lution in the Church of England which for four and a half centuries 
 affected and colored her history. 
 
 Hore, in his " Eighteen Centuries of the Church in England," 
 says : — " The battle of Senlac was considered a holy battle. Nowhere 
 was the Church more submissive to the Pope than in Normandy. 
 Nowhere was the Church so independent of Rome as in England. 
 Foreign priests joined the Norman army. Odo, Bishop of Bayeux and 
 half-brother to William, being one of its most conspicuous leaders : 
 but in England the clergy did all they could to stop the invasion. 
 Alfwig, Abbot of Winchester, with twelve of his monks, fought with 
 Harold, and were killed to a man : many others among the clergy 
 shared the same fate ; the consequence was that William came to the 
 throne with no kindly feelings to the English Church. The cause 
 of the Pope in England was advanced, and England and her Church 
 for the future were brought into closer connexion with and depend- 
 ence on the See of Rome," 
 
 This is true ; and yet we should be Avrong if we regarded the four 
 and a half centuries that intervened between the battle of Senlac 
 and the abolition of the Papal Supremacy in A. I). 15.34, as a period 
 when the Nation and Church of England were totally and passively 
 submissive to the See of Rome. The submission was never total, and 
 the bondage was endured with frequent and significant indications, 
 that sooner or later the day would come when the Nation and the 
 Church would re assert and regain their primitive and rightful 
 freedom. 
 
 Even William the Norman, and his Primate, Lanfranc, an Italian, 
 who had been Abbot of Bee in Normandy, and who had been conse- 
 crated by eight of his own provincial bishops in England, Archbishop 
 of Canterbury in A. D. 1070, were not prepared to yield all that the 
 Pope asked. 
 
 The Pontiff then was Gregory VII., the powerful Ilildebrand, 
 who had humbled to his will the mightiest sovereigns of Europe. 
 Gregory, through his Legate, demanded two things of William. 
 (1) The payment of Peter's Pence, said to be in arrears; and (2) 
 Homage, as from a vassal to his suzerain. William, says Bishop 
 Coxe in his " Institutes of Christian History," perhaps did not know 
 
15 
 
 that Peter's pence, as such, had not hcen paid by former kings of 
 England. Under them the tribute had been paid for the support of 
 their own English College at Rome. Nevertheless William was 
 ready to settle the cash account without dispute. As to homage, he 
 growled out a reply worthy of the bluff Harry Tudor — 
 
 " Homage to thee I do not choose to do : I never promised it : 
 nor do I find that it was ever done by my predecessors to thine." 
 
 Lanfranc, though an Italian, was not more compliant than his 
 King. Lanfranc, bo it remembered, wos a personal friend of Hilde- 
 brand. I give the account of what passed at this juncture between 
 the Pope and the Primate of all England, in the words of riishop 
 Coxe in his " Institutes of Christian History." 
 
 Gregory had relied on Lanfranc to support his claim, and he now 
 reproached his friend, as forgetting the feelings he had formerly pro- 
 fessed of devotion to him and the Koman See. 
 
 If William was an English King, Lanfranc now rose to his 
 position as an English Primate, and replied, " I am ready to yield to 
 your commands in everything according to the Canons.'^ The claims 
 of Hildehrand could not even nominally be reconciled with the 
 Nicene Canons. Lanfranc further said that he had advised William 
 to do as the Pope desired, adding however, curtly and tartly, in the 
 true Anglican spirit, " The reason why he utterly rejects your 
 proposal he has already made kuowu to your legate orally, and 
 to yourself by letter." 
 
 This, however was not what the tamer of kings and superiors 
 could put up with from an Anglican Primate. Thank God, Hilde- 
 brand found in Lanfranc one who would not go to Canossa. It is 
 most important as a landmark to note the pontifical assumptions 
 and the Anglican position at this juncture. 
 
 Thus then wrote Hildehrand to Lanfranc : ** Take care to make 
 your appearance at Rome within four months from this date. Thus 
 may you make amends for a disobedience we have so long over-looked. 
 If these apostolic mandates are unheeded, know for certain, you shall 
 be severed from the grace of St. Peter, and utterly stricken by 
 his authority ; in other words you shall be wholly suspended from 
 your episcopal office." 
 
16 
 
 What happened that year of grace, 108H Deau Hook, in his 
 " Lives of the Archbishops of Canterbury," tells the whole story in 
 one line : " The Archbishop of Canterbury did not go ; and Laufranc 
 was not suspended." 
 
 A cen'ury later, in A. D. 1164, under Henry II., the first of our 
 Plantagenet kings, the Constitutions of Clarendon were enacted, which 
 forbade all appeals to Rorue without the consent of the King. 
 
 Papal aggression during these four and a half centuriee, reached 
 its climax during a reign I have already referred to : when King 
 John placed the whole realm of England at the feet of the Bishop of 
 Rome. The whole country rose against him : clergy, barons, and 
 people calling themselves " The Army of God and the Church." It 
 was the army not only of the barons against the King, but of the 
 Church of England against the Pope. 
 
 On that memorable loth day of June, A. D. 1215, says Little, in 
 his '* Reasons for being a Churchman," the barons of England forced 
 the King to sign the Magna Charta, which was the work of Stephen 
 Langton, Archbishop of Canterbury, and the first article of which 
 declares, " The Church of England shall be free, and have her rights 
 entire and her liberties uninjured." 
 
 The Bishop of Rome, of course was in a fury. He swore, " By 
 St. Peter, this outrage shall not go unpunished." He declared the 
 Charta null and void ; and commanded the Archbishop of Canterbury 
 to excommunicate the barons. This, the patriotic Churchman refused 
 to do. 
 
 The Roman usurper had stretched his power too far : it snapped : 
 and the Magna Charta remained in full force. The Archbishop 
 required the new King, Henry III. to sign it. It has since been ratified 
 thirty-two times ; and despite its Roman nullification, it has ever 
 since been a part of the fundamental law of England. 
 
Hr 
 
 From the opening years of the 13th century, I must auk you to 
 pass on to the niidiUe of the I4tli century, and to the famous Statutes 
 by which the Church of Enghmd was then legally freed from the 
 power of the usurper at Rome. The third Edward, the hero of the 
 battles of Crecy and Poictiers, sat on the English throne. In A. D. 
 1316, the " Statute of Provisors " was passed : this was followed in 
 A. D. 1353, 1365, and 1393, by the successive "Statutes of 
 Praemunire." By these Statutes the Bishop of Rome was forbidden 
 to appoint to any bishopric, or other ecclesiastical preferment in 
 England. These Statutes also prohibited the carrying of any suits 
 to the Roman court, and forbade, under penalty of confiscation of 
 property and perpetual imprisonment, any one to procure from 
 Rome, or elsewhere outside of England, any appointments, bulls, 
 excommunications, or the like. t^ff 
 
 Thus, as has been observed, in theory the Roman yoke was cast 
 off in England in the middle of the 14th century ; but practieallij 
 two things were needed to carry out the theory. 
 
 First, the removal of the popular superstition that, after all, the 
 Bishop of Rome had a sort of divine right over all the Churches of 
 Christendom. 
 
 Secondly, a King bold enough and strong enough to break with 
 the triple tyrant, to say and to act on his words : 
 
 " That no Italian priest shall tithe or toll in our dominions." 
 
 As to the first, the illusion was dispelled in the 15th century : the 
 prestige of Rome was broken by the vices and quarrels of the Bishops 
 of Rome, by the removal of the Papal Court to Avignon, where for 
 more than 70 years the Bishops of Rome were mere puppets of the 
 French king ; and by 50 years of rival Popes cursing and excommuni- 
 cating one another. The illusion was further dispelled in the latter 
 half of the 15th ceutuay by the revival of learning, and by the 
 increased study of Holy Scripture. 
 
 As to the second, it needed only a bold King to take the first 
 step. In the over ruling providence of God, who niakoth even the 
 wrath of man to praise Him, Henry VIII. was the man for the hour. 
 
 As to Henry the Eighth's character, we need not trouble ourselves : 
 it was about as bad as it could be, notwithstanding Froude's white- 
 
wash ; God, liowover, used hitn, as He frequently does bad nion, for 
 the accomplishment of His purposes. ,^ ,., , . 
 
 r 
 
 '" We stand now on the verge of the Reformation era : the prophecy 
 of the Magna Charta is about to receive its accomplishment. 
 " Ecclesia Anglicana libera sit." " The Church of England shall be 
 free." 
 
 Through the good hand of our Go:l over our beloved Church, she 
 preserved unbroken her continuous organic life through the momen- 
 tous changes which the Reformation effected. The Church of England 
 he/ore and after the Reformation was the same : the only difference 
 being that which obtains between a garden unweeded, and a garden 
 weeded : the garden is the same. 
 
 When a man has been sick and has recovered his health, is he not 
 the same man 1 
 
 When a man has been unjustly imprisoned, and has regained his 
 freedom, is he not the same man ? 
 
 When a man has been rolled in the mud and is dirty, and when 
 he has been washed in a bath and is clean again, is he not the same 
 man? 
 
 Health, freedom, cleanliness, those three great spiritual blessings 
 the Church of England regained at her Reformation ; but in regaining 
 them she did not lose her identity ; she did not forfeit her continuous 
 organic life. 
 
 Now let me ask you to fasten your thoughts for a few minutes on 
 that memorable year, A. D, 1534, when the Papal Supremacy was 
 abolished in England. 
 
 How was the extinction of the Papal supremacy effected 1 Not 
 by the tyrauDical act of a monarch, who was ready enough for 
 any deeds of tyranny : not even by an authoritative Act of Parlia- 
 ment. The question was first submitted to the proper Councils of 
 the Church, the Convocations of Canterbury and York. 
 
19 
 
 On March 31, 1534, the Upper and Lower Houses of the Con- 
 vocation of Canterbury, and on June 1, 1534, the Upper and Lower 
 Houses of the Convocation of York, adopted this resolution : 
 
 " Resolved, tliat the Bishop of Rome has no greater jurisdiction 
 conferred on him by God, in this kingdom, than any other foreign 
 bishop." 
 
 • The bishops, abbols, and representative clergy, assembled in the 
 Convocations of Canterbury and York, assented to this proposition, 
 with the single exception of Fisher, Bishop of Rochester. 
 
 This acquiescence and agreement was not the result of hasty 
 passion and indignation ; it was a deliberate conviction, arrived at 
 after a full and careful consideration of the whole question. 
 
 The Universities of Oxford and Cambridge agreed with the Con- 
 vocations of Canterbury and York, and later on in the same year the 
 Parliament and the Sovereign gave the sanction of the government to 
 the decisions of our Church's Councils. 
 
 By the abolition of the Papal Supremacy in A. D. 1634, the 
 Church of England regained the freedom which she possessed in the 
 early centuries of her history. The prophecy, if we may so regard it, 
 of the Magna Charta, was now fulfilled ; and as a result a Catholic 
 Restoration , that is, a Reformation conducted on primitive and Catholic 
 lines was now possible. This leads to the second division of my 
 present subject, which must be more briefly handled. 
 
 II.-THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND: ITS CATHOLIC RESTORATION. 
 
 There is an essential and most vital difference between what took 
 place in England in the sixteenth century, and what took place in 
 Germany, Switzerland and Scotland. 
 
 In those countries the Reformation partook more of the character 
 of a Revolution. 
 
 There was a complete break with the historic Church, the Church 
 of the past. There was an abandonment of the historic Episcopate, 
 and a loss therefore of Apostolic Succession. There was the setting 
 up of an entirely new form of Church government, and the surrender 
 
of those three orders of the Chriatian ministry which had existed 
 continuously in the Catholic Church since the days of the inspired 
 Apostles of our Lord. There was no attonipt made to purify and adapt 
 the existing services of the Church, as found in the old Service-books, 
 parts of which may be traced back to Apostolic or post- Apostolic 
 times ; no attempt therefore to bring back the dignified and stately 
 ritual of the early Catholic Church. 
 
 The reverse of all this happened in England, In England, 
 through the good hand of our God over us, the Reformation partook 
 more of the character of a Restoration. It was essentially a con- 
 servative movement, and a return to primitive and Catholic antiquity. 
 There was no break with the Church of the past ; the Church of 
 England before and after the work of her Restoration was carried out 
 was the same ; the same, with some errors cleared away, and some 
 doctrines and rites of the primitive and purist ages of the Church 
 restored. 
 
 So that, as Flore says, in his " Eighteen Centuries of the Church 
 in England," the Church of England was not, as some people imagine, 
 founded at the Reformation. It was in its essential features not 
 Roman before and Protestant since ; it was the same Catholic Churcli 
 which had existed in ancient Britain from very early times, and 
 which had been organized into unity under the See of Canterbury, 
 by the seventh Archbishop of Canterbury, Theodore of Tarsus. 
 
 There was no abandonment of the historic Episcopate, for many 
 of the Bishops of the un-Reformed Church became Bishops of tha 
 Reformed Church, and were themselves the chief promoters of tho 
 work of Catholic Restoration. 
 
 To carry oat effectually this work of Catholic Restoration, 
 especially in matters of doctrine, it was absolutely necessary to pro- 
 test against tho errors by which tho primitive Catholic truth had been 
 over-laid and to some extent neutralized during the middle ages. 
 
 Vary vigorous, and let me add, very needful, even in our days, 
 are those protests against Roman usurpation, corrupt practices and 
 doctrinal errors, which wo find in our Articles. 
 
 As the work of Catholic Restoration in England necessarily 
 implied the full preservation of tho historic Episcopate, it also 
 
implied that our Reformers were careful to preserve that Apostolic 
 Succession, without which the Episcopate could not have been 
 transmitted. 
 
 In the history of the English Reformation, there was one most 
 critical time when the utmost care was needed, and the utmost care 
 was taken to transmit in our venerable Church that ministry of grace 
 and power which Christ ordained in His Church and gave to His 
 Apostles. 
 
 That critical time took place at the opening of the reign of Queen 
 Elizabeth. 
 
 The sixty-eighth Archbishop of Canterbury, Cardinal Pole, died 
 within a few hours of Queen Mary. So that when Elizabeth, on 
 Nov. 17, 1558, ascended the throne of England, the See of Cantor- 
 bury was vacant. 
 
 In the election, confirmation, and consecration of a successor to 
 Augustine, every precaution was taken that the sixty-ninth Arch- 
 bishop of CAnterbury should be validly and lawfully chosen, con- 
 firmed and consecrated. 
 
 The Dean and Chapter of the Metropolitan Church of Canterbury 
 petitioned the Queen to allow them to elect an Archbishop in the 
 room of Archbishop Pole lately deceased. 
 
 The Queen grantod the usual permission in a letter under her 
 hand and seal, d<tted from her palace at Westminster, July 18, 1559. 
 
 The Dean and Chapter then, according to the ancient manner and 
 laudable custom of the Church, chose the devout and scholarly 
 Matthew Parker, Priest aud Doctor of Divinity. This election took 
 place August 1st, 1559. Parker had been ordained to the Priesthood 
 according to the Latin Pontifical. 
 
 After this election orderly performed and signified according to 
 law, the Queen issued her letters patent of commission for the con- 
 firmation and consecration of Doctor Matthew Parker. 
 
 The first letters patent were issued September 9, 1559. This 
 mandate of the Queen was issued to six Bishops. The clause, *' at 
 least four of J'OU,"' being omitted, it followed that if one was absent, 
 or refused to act, the rest could not proceed to confirm or consecrate. 
 It is certain that three out of the six Bishops, named in the first letters 
 patent, refused to consecrate. 
 
22 
 
 On December 6, 15.59, the Quoeu issued other letters patent, 
 naming six Bishops, and requiring them, or at least four of them, 
 effectually to confirm and consecrate Matthew Parker, Doctor of 
 Divinity, to be Archbishop of Canterbury. Four out of the six 
 Bishops consented to act. 
 
 These letters patent the Queen submitted to divers doctors of the 
 faculties of Divinity and Law, who unanimously approved of them 
 as lawful. 
 
 On December 9, 1559, in the Church of St. Mary-le-Bow, London, 
 Doctor Parker's election was regularly confirmed, open challenge 
 being made for any one to show reason why the elect should not be 
 consecrated. No objection was made. Parker was present by his 
 appointed proxies : William May, Dean of St. Paul's, London ; and 
 Nicolas BuUingham, Doctor of Law. 
 
 All the preliminaries having been duly performed, eight days after 
 his confirmation, Doctor Matthew Parker was consecrated Archbishop 
 of Canterbury, on Sunday, December 17, 1559, in the Chapel of the 
 Archiepiscopal Palace at Lambeth, in the presence of Bishops, 
 Bishops-elect, Priests, Koyal Commissioners, Noblemen and Common- 
 ers of England. 
 
 I quote a portion of the account of this event fraught with the 
 most vital interest to the Church of England, as given by Bailey in 
 his valuable work in " Defence ot Anglican Orders." 
 
 The east end of the Chapel was adorned with tapestry, and the 
 floor was covered with red cloth, and the tabb., which was to be used 
 for the holy oC oS, was placed at the east enc. thereof, adorned with 
 a frontal ? '^'^ a cushion. 
 
 At SIX o'clock in the morning the procession entered the west 
 door of the Chapel, the Archbishop-elect vested in the scarlet gown 
 and hood of his degree, with four wax torches borne before him, 
 accompanied by the four Bishops who wer» to perform the consecration, 
 namely, William Barlow, sometime Bishop of Bath and Wells, now 
 elect of Chichester ; John Scory, sometime Bishop of Chichester, 
 now elect of Hereford; Miles Coverdale, Bishop of Exeter; and 
 John Hodgkins, Suffragan Bishop of Bedford. Of these four Bishops, 
 two hiid been consecrated according to the Latin form of the old 
 
English Ordinal, in the days of Henry VIII., and two according to 
 the English form of the Ordinal during the reign of Edward VI. 
 
 Morning Prayer is said by Andrew Pearson, Chaplain of the 
 Archbishop-el'^ct : Bishop Scory delivers a sermon from the text, 
 " The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder." 
 Preaches, as the old Lambeth register puts it, " not inelegantly." He 
 The sermon over, the Bishops withdraw to vest for the Holy Com- 
 munion, and return ; the Archbishop elect in thfl surplice of a priest ; 
 Bishop Barlow the Celebrant, with the Archdeacons of Canterbury 
 and Lincoln, who were to serve at the altar as deacon and sub-deacon, 
 in gorgeous copes of silk. 
 
 After the Gospel, the candidate is presented; the Queen's man- 
 date for consecration is read ; the oath of office is administered ; the 
 people are bidden to pray for the candidate ; Bishop Barlow sings the 
 Litany, the choir responding. After the usual questions and answers, 
 th« four Bishops lay their Apostolic hands on the head of the kneel- 
 ing priest, each one of them saying in English the words of Con- 
 secration ; ami Doctor Matthew Parker rises a Bishop in the Church 
 of God, and is vested in his Episcopal robes. 
 
 The Archbishop having been thus duly consecrated, the Queen, 
 on Dec. 31, 1559, issued her mandate to the Archdeacon of Canter- 
 bury, to enthrone the said Lord Archbishop. 
 
 On January 1st, 1560, the sixty-ninth Archbishop of Canterbury, 
 sitting in the Chair of Augustine, is enthroned in the Metropolitan 
 Cathedral of Canterbury. 
 
 The Archbishop, having thus been confirmed, consecrated, and 
 enthroned, the Queen, on March 21, 1560, issued her mandate for his 
 legal investiture with the temporalities of the See. 
 
 No event in the history of the Church of England is better certi- 
 fied than the Consecration of Archbishop Parker. I must refer you 
 to Bailey's " Defence of Anglican Orders," or to a book which every 
 Churchman should possess and carefully road, Little's " Reasons for 
 baing a Churchman," for a list of the documents which conclusively 
 prove the fact of his consecration. 
 
 In that year, 1560, Pope Pius IV. addressed a letter to Queen 
 Elizabeth, offering to acknowledge the work of the Reformation of 
 
24 
 
 the Church of England, expressing also his willingness to approve of 
 our Book of Common Prayer, including our Communion Service and 
 our Ordinal, on one condition — submission to the See of Rome. 
 
 It is needless to say that neither the English Sovereign, nor the 
 English Nation, nor the English Church, could accept again that 
 badge of servitude. In the first year, almost in the first month of 
 her reign, Queen Elizabeth had publicly spoken these memorable 
 words, worthy of an English Sovereign : 
 
 " Our records show that the papal jurisdiction over this realm was 
 a usurpation. To no power whatever is my crown subject, save that 
 of Christ, the King of kings. I shall, therefore, regard as enem.es, 
 both to God and myself, all such of my subjects as shall hereafter 
 own any foreign or usurped authority within my realm " 
 
 For twelve years, the first twelve years of the reign of Elizabeth, 
 the whole body of Englishmen conformed to the national Reformed 
 Church of England. 
 
 Who broke the peace 1 Who commenced the sad work of 
 schism from the Anglican branch of Christ's Holy Catholic Church? 
 
 The Pope. Pius IV had passed away. He was succeeded by a 
 man who breathed the intolerant and persecuting spirit of a Torque- 
 piada : Pius V. 
 
 On April 27, 1570, Pius V. issued his famous Bull, entitled, 
 '^ The Damnation and Excommunication of Elizabeth ;" deposing the 
 Queen forsooth from her thione, absolving all her subjects from their 
 oath of alljegience to their Sovereign, and commanding them to with- 
 draw from their national Church. 
 
 A mere handful of Englishmen, in disloyalty to the Catholic 
 Church in England, and in treason to their lawful Sovereign, seceded 
 and formed the Roman schism in England. 
 
 The guilt of the commencement of schism in England, lies at the 
 door of Pope Pius V. He too, through the Jesuits, was the constant 
 abettor of treason against our lawful Sovereign. Yet he is a canon- 
 ized saint of the Roman Breviary ! 
 
 But I must draw this Lecture to a close. In tracing out the 
 Catholic Restoration of the Church of England, I have shown you, 
 in contradistinction with what tgok place elsewhere, that there was 
 
no break with the historic Church, the Church of England before and 
 after the Reformation, was the same. I have shown you further that 
 there was no abandonment of the historic Episcopate, and that at a 
 most critical time, the utmost possible care was taken to preserve 
 Apostolic Succession. 
 
 I would remind you further, that in the carrying out of this 
 work of Catholic Restoration, there was no setting up of a new 
 form of Church government, and no surrender therefore of the three 
 orders of the Cliristian ministry which had continuously existed from 
 the days of Christ's Apostles. The Preface to our Ordinal, I need 
 hardly remind you, contains a distinct categorical statement on this 
 subject. 
 
 And finally, I must remind you that an honest, thoughtful, and 
 to a great extent, successful attempt was made to purify and adapt 
 the forms and ceremonies of Divine worship found in the old Service- 
 Books of the Church : and the result is the Book which, next to the 
 Bible, every Churchman loves — our English Book of Common 
 Prayer. 
 
 It has passed, as you know, through various revisions ; and some 
 writer has summed up the account of the revisions in this way: The 
 Prayer Book of 1549, the first Prayer Book of Edward VI., was the 
 old casket of Catholic devotion, stript of all tawdry additions, and 
 made perfectly useful and acceptable to English Catholics : that of 
 1552, the second Prayer Book of Edward VI., and to a lesser extent 
 that of 1559, the Prayer Book of Elizabeth, was the casket robbed of 
 many of its precious gems and jewels; and that of 1662, which was 
 the result of tlie Caroline pettlemeut after the Conference of the 
 Savoy, is the original casket carefully restored and repaired, but with 
 some precious stones still missing. 
 
 Let us humbly and devoutly thank God that our beloved Church, 
 through all the changes of the past, has preserved her continuous 
 organic life. 
 
 Let us thank God for her Catholic Restoration, and for those 
 revivals in spiritual religion, in Catholic worship, and in missionary 
 zeal, which have marked her history during this nineteenth century. 
 
26 
 
 And just as we .ire enteViug on tlie closing decade of tliis eventful 
 century, may we not thank God for a judgment issuing from the 
 Metropolitan throne of Augustine, whose whole tendency is to 
 Banction in matters ot ritual, the work of Catholic Kestoratiou. Let us 
 earnestly pray that the recent judgnieut of the 92nd xirchbishop of 
 Canterbury may, above all things, promote ritual peace within the 
 borders of our beloved Zion. 
 
 And aa we look forward into the future, and the great work 
 devolving on our Church in her conflict with infidelity and lawless- 
 ness and ungodliness, and in the guarding and nurture of the sheep 
 of Christ's flock committed to her care, every earnest Churchman will 
 pray that God will abundantly bless in all her wide realm-* our 
 spiritual Zion, and every loyal Churchman will heartily reecho the 
 wish with wfekt I will close — 
 
 Floreat EccLEsiA Anglicana. 
 
Tl]6 Three- Fold Apostolic Ministry 
 
 OK THE 
 
 HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH. 
 
 A. SERMON 
 
 PREACHED ev 
 
 The rev. ISAAC BROCK, D. D., 
 
 RECTOR OF HORTON Ac. 
 
 IM ST. JAMES' CHURCH, KENTVILLE, N. S. 
 
 ON SUNDAY, OCTOBER IITM, 18SI. 
 
 " We cannot surrender for any immediate advantages the three-fold ministry which 
 we have inherited from Apostolio times, and which ia the historic backbone of the Church." 
 
 — Binhop Light/oot: " Leaders in the Northern. Ch^ireh," 
 
 MORTON & CO., 
 
 BARHINGTON STREET, HALIFAX. 
 
 A. D. 1 89 1. 
 
" Piml imd Timolheu?. the .=erviints of .Te-ius Christ, to nil the s.iints in Christ Jesus 
 Which are at Philipiii, with the bishops anddeiicons."— Phimppians I. 1. 
 
 My subject to-niglit is the Three-fold Apostolic Minis' ry of the 
 Holy C",tholic Church : Bishops. Priests, and Deacons. 
 
 Let me first call your attention to the deliberate judgment of the 
 Church of England on this point. At the end of your Prayer-Rooks 
 you will three services,— The Ordering of Deacons, The Ordering of 
 Priests, and The Consecration of Bishops. In the Preface to those 
 Services, you will find the judgment of the Church on the subject 
 before us to-night. It is given in these words with which the Preface 
 to those Services opens : 
 
 " It is evident unto all men diligently reading the Holy Scripture 
 and ancient Authors, that from the Apostles' time there have been 
 these Orders of Ministers in Christ's Church : Bishops, Priests, and 
 Deacons." 
 
 With these words before us, no Churchman can pretend that the 
 Church of England has left the question of the Threefold Ministry 
 of the Church an open question If, as our Church asserts, there 
 have been ''from the Apostles' time" these Orders of Ministers 
 in Christ's Church, — Bishops, Priests, and Deacons,— then they are 
 of Apostolic appointment, then they belong not merely to the well- 
 being of a Church, they belong to her very essence. Without the 
 Three fold Order of the Ministry, there is no such thing as an 
 Apostolic Church. 
 
 I am about to present to you to-night a seven fold argument for 
 the Threefold Ministry of the Holy Catholic Church. I pr^^sent the 
 argument in this form, because thus it may be moie easily remem- 
 bered. 
 
so 
 
 Let us theu direct our thoughts to seven periods of history. 
 
 I. First. — The times of the ancient Jewish Church. 
 
 Every detail of ritual, worship, and government connected with 
 the Church of Israel, was of Divine appointment. What, then, was 
 the nature of its Ministry ? It was a Ministry of three Orders, con- 
 sisting of a High Priest, Priests, and Levitea. Was not this a type 
 ov prophecy of the Three-fold Ministry of the Holy Catholic Church 1 
 
 There is, however, one point of ditfercnce. The Jewish Church 
 had only one High Pries- m Holy Catholic Church has many 
 Bishops. This diti'erence might have been expected. The Jewish 
 Church was for one small nation only : the Catholic Church, (as its 
 name implies) is for all nations. Therefore the one High Priest of 
 Israel is replaced by the many Bishops of the Holy Catholic Church. 
 
 II. Secondly. — The time of our Lord's personal Ministry on 
 earth. 
 
 He prepared the way for tne establishment in His Church of a 
 Three-fold Ministry. Such a Ministry existed during our Lord's 
 personal mission to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. There was 
 our Lord Himself in the first place, the twelve Apostles in tlie 
 second rank, whom He ordained, and there were the seventy 
 Disciples in the third rank, whom He sent forth to teach and to 
 preach in the cities of Israel. (See second Lesson for this evening 
 service.) Here then we discern a distinct preparation on the part of 
 our Lord for the Three-fold Ministry of that Church which He was 
 about to establish on earth. 
 
 III. Thirdly. — The opening years of the Ministry of the 
 Apostles ; from A. D. 30 to A. D. 50 ; from the Day of Pentecost to 
 the first Council of the Christian Church held at Jerusalem, recorded 
 in Acts XV. 
 
 The Holy Catholic Church starts at once with a Three-fold Min- 
 istry. There were the Apostles in the first rank, the Seventy in the 
 second rank, and the Deacons in the third rank. The appointment 
 and ordination of Deacons grew out of the growing needs of the 
 Church, and is recorded in Acts vi. 
 
31 
 
 The Seventy, no doul)t, fornicd tlio nucleus of that OidGr ot 
 Elders which the Apostles ordained in every city where they planted 
 the Christian Church. Thus in the record of the first missionary 
 journey of St. Paul, recorded by St. Luke in Acts xiii, xiv, we road 
 that Paul and Pmrnahas " ordained them Elders in every Church." 
 And in the account of the Council at Jerusalem, we read of the 
 Elders of the (^hurch in conjunction with the Apostles. 
 
 Thus in the first twenty years of hor history, the Holy Catholic 
 Church had a Three-fold Ministry, consisting of Apostles, Elders, and 
 Deacons. 
 
 Before I pass to the fourth period of history, which embraces the 
 middle age of the Ministry of the Apostles, I pause for a moment to 
 ask your attention to an event which closes the third period and opens 
 the fourth — the Council at Jerusalem — held about A. I). 50. I will 
 not dwell on the circumstances connected with the calling of that 
 Council, nor on its decrees, important though these are, att'ecting as 
 they did the whole future history of the Holy Catholic Church in 
 its mission among the nations of the world, liut I call your attention 
 to one particular which has a most important bearing on the subject 
 before us. Who presided at that Councd ? Who, as the mouth- 
 piece of the Church pronounced its decree? Who would we have 
 expected to do this? 1 think we should have expected St. Peter to 
 have presided on this occasion. St. Jerome tells us that he was the 
 oldest of the Apostles. He was undoubtedly, " primus inter pares," 
 first among equals. For these ar,d other reasons, we might have 
 expected him to occupy the President's chair at the first Council of 
 the Church. 
 
 Yet he did not do so That place was occupied by St. James. 
 Why? St. liUke's Tlistory in the Acts does not supply us with the 
 answer, But Church history does. We consult the ecclesiastical 
 writers of the second and third century, and they, with singular 
 unanimity, inform us that St. James was the Apostle, or, as he would 
 be called from the opening of the second century and since, Bishop 
 of the Church at Jerusalem. 
 
 As Bishop of the Church at Jerusalem, St. James would naturally 
 preside at a Council held at Jerusalem, the first and earliest- home of 
 
82 
 
 the Cliurch of God : umler him would be the Elders .lud Deacons of 
 that Church. 
 
 So that iu A. D. 50, twenty years after Christ's Ascension to 
 to Heaven, iu the twentietli year of the Church's liistory, we see the 
 Mother Church of Christendom, governed by its Aj)03tle, or Diocesan 
 Bishop, and under hiin were the other two Orders of the Christian 
 Ministry, Elders and Deacons. 
 
 IV. I pass to the fourth period of history ; the middle years of 
 the Ministry of the Apostles, from A. D. 50 to A. D. 60 ; from the 
 Council at Jerusalem to St. Paul's embarkation at Csesaroa for Italy. 
 
 This period embraced the second and third missionary journey* 
 of St Paul. To this period belong eleven Chapters of the Acts of 
 the Apostles, Chapters xvi. to xxvi. inclusive. 
 
 During this period the conservative influence that has ever been 
 at work in the Holy Catholic Church, preserved the three Orders of 
 the sacred Ministry which were in existence during the past twenty 
 years : Apostles, Elders and Deacons. 
 
 But during this period we find another name given to the second 
 Order of the Ministers which it is important, for many reasons, to 
 take note of. Before doing so, however, I should mention that the 
 Greek word for Elders, Presbuteroi, gives the name to the second 
 Order of the Ministry, with which we are so familiar to-day, Presby- 
 ters, which is contracted or shortened into Priests ; so that the three 
 Orders of the Christian Ministry, A. D. 50, might be described aa 
 Apostles, Priests, and Deacons. 
 
 But (as I have said) during this fourth period, that is, between 
 A. D. 50 and A. I). 60, appears a new name for the second Order of 
 the Christian Ministry, which it is very important that we should take 
 careful note of. 
 
 You have this new name first in Acts xx. 28, in St. Paul's fare- 
 well address to the Elders, or Priests of the Church at Ephesus. 
 " Take heed therefore unto yourselves and to all the flock, over 
 which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers.'" The word in the 
 Greek is Episcopoi, which we generally translate, Bishops. 
 
 This is the first time that the word Episcopos, or Bishop, occurs 
 in our New Testament. It means, as its translation in our Author- 
 
33 
 
 ized Version of Acts xx. 28 shows, an Overseer, And first it was 
 undoubtedly applied to the Overseer of flocks, to Presbyters, or 
 Priests. 
 
 The word occurs only five times in our Greek Testament : four 
 times out of five it is applied to the second Order of Christian 
 Ministers. Once it is applied to our Lord in I Peter ii., who is there 
 called, " The Shepherd and Bishop of our souls." 
 
 In the Apostolic ago then, the second Order of the Christian Min- 
 istry M'ere called Presbyters, or Bishops. This second name was given 
 them because they were appointed by the Apostles and their 
 successors to be Overseers of flocks. 
 
 I admit then, and no Churchman has any hesitation in making 
 the admission, that in the Apostolic age of the Church, the names of 
 Bishop and Presbyter were used interchangeably. The question at 
 issue between us and the Presbyterians, is not a question of names, 
 but of offices. The question is, were there, or were there not, three 
 Orders of Ministers in Christ's Chuich in Apostolic times] And has 
 the office (not the name) of Apostle survived in the Christian Church ? 
 
 So far, from A. D. 30 to A. D. 60, that is, during the first thirty 
 yeais of the life of the Holy Catholic Church, we have seen that there 
 were three Orders of Ministers in Christ's Church : Apostles ; Bishops, 
 Presbyters, or Priests ; and Deacons. 
 
 V. I pass now to the fifth period of history which embraces the 
 closing years of the Ministry of all the Apostles except St. John ; 
 from A. D. 60 to A. D. 70 ; from St. Paul's first arrival at Pome, to 
 the martyrdom at Home of St. Peter and St. Paul. 
 
 The portion.s of our New Testament that boar on this period are 
 Acts xxviii., the Epistles of St. Peter, the Epistles of St. Paul to the 
 Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and his Pastoral Epistles to 
 Timothy and Titus. 
 
 The evidences for a Threefold Ministry in the Christian Church 
 during this period are very clear. We have also remarkably plain 
 proof that the Apostles intended their office to continue in the Church. 
 We see them providing for their successors. 
 
34 
 
 Look first at the language of my text : " Paul and Timotheus, 
 the servauts of Jesus Christ, to all the saints in Christ Jesus at 
 Philippi, with the Bishops and Deacons." 
 
 Here we have brought before us in one verse the whole Church, 
 together with its Three-fold Ministry. First, we have Paul and 
 Timotheus, Apostles and Rulers of the Church, then the Bishops or 
 Presbyters, then the Deacons, and also the whole body of the 
 Christian laity, " all the saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi." That 
 passage alone is able to establish the fact that the Church of Apostolic 
 days had a Three-fold Ministry. 
 
 Then look at the Epistles of St. Paul to Timothy and Titus, and 
 note carefully the position assigned by St. Paul to Timothy and 
 Titus in the Churches of Ephesus and Crete respectively. 
 
 Timothy is entrusted by St. Paul with the government of the 
 Cliurch at Ephesus. He has under him Bishops or Presbyters, and 
 Deacons. The ordering of the public prayers of the Church ; the 
 judging of tlie qualifications of Bishops or Presbyters, and Deacons ; 
 the ordaining of Ministers ; the rebuking (when necessary) of Elders, 
 or Presbyters ; in fact the whole government of tha Church at 
 Ephesus is entrusted by St. Paul to Timothy. Timothy Avas to be to 
 the Church of Ephesus what St. Paul had hitherto been, its Apostolic 
 ruler, or, as we should express it to-day, its Diocesan Bishop. 
 
 Timothy was a young man. St. Paul was advancing in years and 
 Bearing the end of his ministry. In a most important sphere of his 
 Apostolic labor, (specimen of what happened elsewhere), St. Paul 
 provides that his office shall be continued. In his Epistles to Timothy 
 we see St. Paul giving directions to one who was to be his successor 
 in the Apo.stolic government of a portion of the Holy Catholic 
 Church. 
 
 In the Epistle of St. Paul to Titua, who was set by him over all 
 the Church of Crete, we see like directions to those given to Timothy ; 
 he was to " s'^t in order the things that are wanting, and ordain 
 Elders (Presbyters) in every city." Titus, then, was to be the 
 Apostolic ruler of the Churches of Crete, having under him numerous 
 Bishops or Prosbyters, and Deacons. 
 
 During the ten closing years then of the Ministry of the Apostles, 
 from A. D. 60 to A. D 70, we have clear evidence of the existence 
 
35 
 
 of a Three-fold Miuustry in the Apostolic Church, We soo tho 
 Apostles and men like Timothy and Titus, and others, who wielded 
 Apostolic powers; Risiiops, or Presbyters, or Priests ; and Deacons ; 
 and during this period, (wheu we would naturally expect it) we havo 
 clear proof that the Apostles intended their office to continue in the 
 Church : we see them in fact making provision for and giving 
 directions to their successors.'' 
 
 VI. The sixth period brings us to the thirty closing years of tho 
 first Christian century : from A. 1). 70 to A. D, 100 : from the death 
 of St. Peter, St. Paul, and others of the Apostles, to the death of St. 
 John. 
 
 There can be no doubt that during this period, the second and 
 third Orders of the Christian Ministry continued in the Church. 
 What evidence, ^additional to that ailbrded by the Pastoral Epistles) 
 have we of the continuan'e of the first and highest Order of tho 
 Christian Ministry ? 
 
 We have the testimony of the last surviving Apostle, St. John. 
 In the Book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ, (A. J). 95), he is 
 directed to write to the seven Churches of Lesser Asia, 'i'o whom, 
 by Christ's own order does he address these Epistles? To a Board 
 of Presbyters ? a Synod ? a General Assembly or Conference? No: 
 but to an individual whom he call.'^ "The Angel" of the Church. 
 An Angel means one sent with a message. These Angels (in Rev. 
 i., ii., iii.,) evidently occupy an official or responsible position. 
 Moreover, our Lord holds each Angel answerable for the good 
 government of the Church under him. 
 
 Who, then, could these Angels be? Who but the Apostolic 
 Rulers of their respective Churches ?f Church History tells us wo 
 are right in this conclusion : more, Church History gives us the very 
 names of the Angels, or IJishops, o*" the seven Churches of Lesser 
 Asia. 
 
 • See explanatory note at tho end of the Sermon on I. Tim. iv., 14. 
 
 t Archbishop Trench, in his Commentary on the Epistles to the Seven Churches of 
 Asia, after showing that the Angel could only bo a Bishop, u Bishop, too, with the pre- 
 rogatives which we apply to such, on the use of the term Angel, in this Book, remarks : 
 '* There is a certain mystcriousness and remoteness from tho common language of man, in 
 the adoption of this term, and such there is intended to be. It belongs to the enigmatic, 
 symbolic character of the Book, elevated to its language throughout above the level of 
 daily life." 
 
At the close of the first .Christian cuntury, then we behold the 
 Holy Catholic Church witli its Three-fold Ministry : Apostles or 
 Angels, Presbyters, and Deacons. 
 
 VII. I pass to the seventh and last period ; the opening decade 
 of the second Christian century, from A. I). 100 to A. D. 110. 
 
 At the opening of the second century, St Ignatius, a disciple of 
 St. John, was IJishop of Antioch. By the orders of Emperor Trajan, 
 St. Ignatius, because he confessed himself a (Christian, was taken 
 from Antiocli to I'onie, and there in the Coliseum in the presence of 
 tens of thousands of spectators, thrown to tlie wild beasts, so receiving 
 the crown of martyrdom. 
 
 On his journey from Antioch to K'onie he composed seven letters, 
 mostly to the Churches of Lesser Asia ; in six out of them he makes 
 distinct mention of the three Orders of the (Christian Ministry, and by 
 their present names : Hishop-^, Priests and Deacons. In his Epistle 
 to the Trallians, alter mentioning the names of the three Orders of 
 the Ministry, lie says : " Without them there is no Church." 
 
 The first Order of the Christian Ministry from the days of St. 
 Ignatius was called not Apostles, but Bishops. TertuUian gives the 
 reason. The successors of the Apostles did not consider themselves 
 worthy to be called Apostles, therefore they took a name which 
 hitherto had been with Presbyter, an alternate name of the second 
 Order of the Ministry. From the commencement of the second cen- 
 tury, therefore, the word P]piscopos, or Bishop, denoted no longer the 
 Overseer of a flock, but the Overseer of the pastors of the flocks. 
 
 I need not pursue the matter any further. From the second 
 century, what TertuUian says, " Nulla Ecclesia sine Episcopo ;" — 
 "No Church without a Bishop;" — has been a fact as well as a 
 maxim. 
 
 Since the time of Christ's Apostles then, these three Ordeis of 
 Ministers have existed in every Christian Church ; Bishops, Priests, 
 and Deacons : and they continued so to exist till the sixteenth 
 century, till Calvin in Switzerland and Knox in Scotland inaugurated 
 the Presbyterian form of government. 
 
 Hooker's challenge to the Puritans at the end of the sixteenth 
 century has never been answered. He challenged the Puritans of 
 
37 
 
 liis (lay to sliow during the sixteen centuries preceding tlie Reforma- 
 tion, one (Church which had been ordered by their regimen, or one 
 Church which had not been ordered by the Episcopal regimen since " 
 the time that the blessed Apostles were conversant here on earth. 
 
 It was the apprehension of this fact, the continuous existence of a 
 Three-fold Ministry in the Church, and the limitation of the power of 
 Ordination to the first and highest Order that led to the conversion 
 from Congregationalism to the Church of England of a well-known 
 clergyman in London, who died a few years ago. I allude to the 
 Ivev. Dr. Gibson, for many year Rector of Bethnal Green, London. 
 I asked him, on one occasion, what led him to join the Church of 
 England He detailed to me at some length, the reasons that led him 
 to be dissatisfied with the Congregational system in which he had 
 been educated, and of which he was a Minister : and at last, he said, 
 I sat do'»n to read the whole history of the Church from the begin- 
 ning ; and when I came on this startling fact meeting me on every 
 page of Church History, from the first to the sixteenth century, that 
 during all those centuries no one had ever dared to minister at the 
 Church's altars without receiving E])iscopal Ordination, I made up 
 my mind that I would never again minister till I had received 
 Episcopal Ordination. He then applied to the Bishop of Exeter, in 
 whose Diocese he had been exercising his duties as a Congregational 
 Minister, and in due cour83 ho was ordained a Deacon, and then a 
 Priest of the Church of God. 
 
 To conclude. 
 
 You should pray for God's Ministers, that by their preaching and 
 living they may set forth God's Holy Word. 
 
 And you should [."ray for yourselves, that you may profit by the 
 ministry of God's Holy Word, which you enjoy. 
 
 The Collect for St. Peter's Day is a suitable one to use : " 
 Almighty God, who by Thy Son Jesus Christ didst give to Thy 
 Apostle St. Peter many excellent gifts, and commandost him earnestly 
 to feed Thy flock : make, we beseech Thee, all Bishops and Pastors 
 diligently to preach Thy Holy Word, and the people obediently to 
 follow the same, that they may receive the crown of everlasting glory ; 
 through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen." 
 
38 
 
 EXPLANATORY NOTE ON I. TIM. iv. 14. 
 
 " Neglect not the gift that is in tliee, which was given thee by prophecy^, 
 with the laying on of the hands of Ihf Presbytery." — This passage is relied 
 on by Presbyterians as proving that Timothy received ordination at the 
 hands of a body of Presbyters, that Timothy's ordination was in fact 
 Presbyterian ordination. In another passage, however, 8t. Paul claims 
 that Timothy's ordination was performed by himself. II. Tim. i. G. : " Stir 
 up the gift ol God which is in thee, by the putting on of my hands." 
 
 How are these two passages to be reconciled ? Does not the mode of 
 the Ordination of a Presbyter in the Church of England, followed in other 
 branches of the Church Catholic, supply the reconciliation ? In the service 
 for " The Ordering of Priests," before the act of Oi-dination, we have this 
 Rubric. " When this prayer is done, the Bishop with the Priests present, 
 shall lay their hands severally upon the head of every one that receiveth 
 the Order of Priesthood : the Receivers humbly kneeling upon their knees, 
 and the Bishop saying, ' Receive the Holy Ghost for the Office and Work 
 of a Priest in the Church of God, now committed unto thee by the Imposition 
 of our hands, Ac' '" The Bishop ordains with the concurrence of the 
 Presbyters present ; they signify their concurrence by uniting with the 
 Bishop in the laying on of hands. Might not this have been the mode of 
 Timothy's Ordination ? 
 
 It is to be noted that two dilferent prepositions in the Greek, indicate the 
 share respectively of the Ordaining Apostle and the consenting Presbyters. 
 Timothy was ordained, St. Paul said, "By (dia) the putting on of my 
 hands;"' and, " With (meta) the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery." 
 Dr. Macknight, a Presbyterian commentator, when discussing I. Tim. iv. 
 14, says: " Since it appears from II. Tim. i. 6, that the Apostle, by the 
 imposition of his own hands, conferred on Timothy ihe spiritual gift here 
 mentioned, we must suppose that the Eldership at Lyslra laid their hands 
 on him only to show their concurrence with the Apostle in sotting Timothy 
 apart to the ministry by prayer." 
 
 For a further discussion of the subject briefly handled in this Sermon, 
 see Little's " Reasons for being a Churchman," Chapters IX. to XIII. 
 
"MORTON &C0,,,. 
 
 Promncmt Book Store, 
 
 BIBLES. PRAYER and y 
 
 ^ HYMN BOOKS, : , 
 
 M "CHURCH " LITERATURE. 
 ■:^ ''■ . . COLLEGE AND 
 > ' ,' SCHOOL BOOKS. 
 
 PARISH & SUNDAY SCHOOL 
 ■.-...:... REQUISITES. V. ,...-. 
 
 S. S. Libraries and Gift Bool(s, 
 
 - STATIONERK OP ALL KINDS. ^ . 
 
 I rlntlno of every description. 
 
 AT THE LOWEST PRICES. 
 
 5®^ Orders prornptly filled cind satis- 
 faction guaranteed. 
 
 S. p. e. K. DEPOSITORY. 
 
 Provinoial Book Store,