%. ^ r.%. 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 / 
 
 O 
 
 
 V 
 
 P. 
 
 
 
 
 f/j 
 
 ^ ,*.^ 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 V^ IM {|{||2.2 
 S l£ 12.0 
 
 
 1.8 
 
 U IIII1I.6 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
^^ 
 
 L<y 
 
 C^ 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy whici may be bibllographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checited below. 
 
 L'Institut a microfiimd le meiileur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 point de vue bibiiographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent oxiger u.ie 
 modification dans la m6thode normale de filmage 
 sent indiqu6s ci-dessous. 
 
 n 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommag^e 
 
 □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur^e et/ou pellicul6e 
 
 D 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaur6es et/ou pelliculdes 
 
 □ Cover title missing/ 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d6color6es, tachetdes ou piqudes 
 
 n 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 □ Pages detached/ 
 Pages ddtach^es 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 □ Quality of print varies/ 
 Qualitd in^gale de I'impression 
 
 □ includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel supplementaire 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serr6e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intdrieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from fMming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 filmdes. 
 
 I — I Only edition available/ 
 
 D 
 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been ref limed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuiilet d'eriata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 filmdes d nouveau de fa9on d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 D 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires: 
 
 □ This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 Ce document est filmd au taux de reduction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 / 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 University of Toronto Library 
 ARCHIVES 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grdce d la 
 gdn6rosit6 de: 
 
 University of Toronto Library 
 
 ARCHIVES 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetd de l'exemplaire filmd, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol ^^- (moaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimde sont filmis en commen9ant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont film6s en commenpant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparattra sur la 
 dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbole — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbole V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 filmds d des taux de reduction diff^rents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre 
 reproduit en un seul cliche, il est film6 d partir 
 de Tangle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche d droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mdthode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
ft.'R. 
 
 CXI 
 
 "iidoru 
 
 SOME FURTHER FACTS 
 
 CONCERNING 
 
 FEDERATION 
 
 BY 
 
 NATHANAEL BURWASH, S.T.D., 
 
 Chancellor, Victoria CoUecfe. 
 
 % 
 
 [Keprinted from Methodint Magamu of February, 1890.] 
 
 
1 « 
 
Some Further Facts Concerning Federation. 
 
 BY NATHANAEL BURWASH, S.T.D., 
 
 Chancellor, Victoria University. 
 
 1 Reprinted from Methodixt Magazine of February, IfOO.] 
 
 It affords me no little pleasure to accept the opening paragraph 
 of the Rev. J. Allen's "Facts concerning Federation." I quite 
 agree with Dr. Harris, whom he quotes, that "the first and 
 greatest need " of a university " is men." " Get strong, well 
 qualified, thoroughly competent men for professors, and you have 
 your university." I quite agree with him also in his commenda- 
 tion of the method pursued so largely in Victoria for obtaining 
 those men. But in making this statement, as the foundation of 
 what he professes to be a careful and trustworthy investigation 
 of what is required to build up a university quite adequate to 
 meet all the wants of the Methodist people of Ontario, he has con- 
 demned his own work. He tells us a great deal about the cost of 
 apparatus and of libraries, and he has visited a dozen universities, 
 and travelled a couple of thousand miles, to learn that we need to 
 expend less than twenty thousand dollars on these two supple- 
 mental requisites of a university ; and he has left us without the 
 first line of information as to what it will cost to equip a fairly 
 efficient Methodist University in this Province with the necessary 
 number of " strong, well qualified, thoroughly competent men." 
 
 The expense of this fundamental part of an independent uni- 
 versity will, of course, depend upon the salaries paid and the 
 number of men to be employed. As to the salaries, I take it for 
 granted that neither Mr, Allan, nor the alumni to whom he 
 speaks, nor the Methodist Church, expect to find " strong, well 
 qualified, thoroughly competent men " who will work for less than 
 a respectable living. And he surely cannot pretend that 12,000 
 a year is an extravagant salary in a town like Cobourg ; or that 
 $2,500 is beyond the mark in the city of Toronto. If he ques- 
 tions this, I can only refer him to those of Our present staff who 
 have families to support, and let him ask them if they can live on 
 less. He need not tra,vel a thousand miles from home to ascertain 
 that fact. 
 
 The second question. How many men must we employ ? involves 
 three considerations : (1) the number of students to be taught ; (2) 
 the nature and extent of the course or courses of study ; (3) the 
 character of the colleges with which we must compete. 
 
 1. I^ay take it for granted that we should make provision for 
 
Sotnc Fid'ther Forts 
 
 two hundred students in Arts. I select this numliei' because we 
 enrol nearly that number now each year, and because it repre- 
 sents as large a number as can be efficiently provided for by a 
 single staff. A college Avith less than a hundred students can be 
 worked on a half staff, because with small numbers the classes 
 can be doubled; and more than half the colleges of the United 
 States come under this class, and are carried on with from five to 
 seven men ; they are really " one-horse " colleges, ploughing with 
 half a team. 
 
 (2) As to the nature of the course of study, I shall take for 
 granted that Mr. Allen and his friends do not propose to loAver the 
 standard either of matriculation, or of graduation, to the B. A. 
 degree. I shall, therefore, consider that three lectures a day in 
 liitcrature and Mathematics, and two, with the necessary labora- 
 tory preparation, in Science, represent full work for a professor. 
 If Mr. Allen had inquired, he would have found that this is from 
 fifty to a hundred per cent, heavier work than is performed by the 
 professors in most of the celebrated colleges he has visited. I shall 
 take it for granted that three hours a day represents a reasonable 
 amount of instruction for a pass student, and three and a half on 
 the average for an honour student. This is the almost universal 
 rule for pass-work in the United States, and has been our rule in 
 Victoria for many years. 
 
 As to the extent of the course or courses of study, the amount 
 of work done in each department, and also the number of depart- 
 ments admitted, the answer must depend upon the question of 
 options. On this question of options, Mr. Allen is pleased to in- 
 sinuate that I am just waking up to this modern question, and 
 accepting " fashions of the hour " " when the hour is past and the 
 fashions are old." If this means anything to Mr. Allen's purpose, 
 It means that w^e are going back again to the old fixed course, 
 l^othing but strange unacquaintance with the history of the uni- 
 versity movement of England and America for the last forty years 
 could make a man bold enough to venture such an assertion. Op- 
 tions and optional coui'ses have been abused, and those who have 
 been my associates in work know that I have been no advocate of 
 a " free-lunch system." But so long as the B. A. degiee continues 
 to be the common university degree, and represents the scholastic 
 training with which our best men enter upon their preparation 
 for their special calling or profession, that B. A. degree must 
 represent at least five or six optional courses. Your clergymen, 
 lawyers, and a part of the teaching profession will require Classics 
 or Philosophy. Your engineers, manufacturers, and medical men 
 will require Mathematics or Science. Your commercial men 
 
Concerning Federation. 5 
 
 your journalists, and your politicians will require Modern 
 Languages and History, or History and Civil Polity, and your 
 teachers will require at least three out of the last four. Five 
 of these parallel optional courses are fully recognized by McGill, 
 (Queen's and Victoria to-day, as well as by Toronto ; and our whole 
 system of public education in Ontario is based upon their recog- 
 nition. 
 
 This breadth of optional work will disappear only when the 
 B. A. degree disappears from our university, and the work now 
 represented by it is mostly relegated to the gymnasium or colle- 
 giate institute, as it is now in Germany, and then these prelimi- 
 nary courses may be reduced to two — a course principally literary, 
 with Science and Mathematics supplementary ; and a coui-se prin- 
 cipally scientittc and mathematical, with Languages and Litera- 
 ture supplementary. This is President Oilman's ideal. The col- 
 lege m Johns Hopkins is but a preparatory school. And his ideal 
 of the future before the denominational colleges of the United 
 States is that they should become such preparatory schools. The 
 United States has no such system of secondary education sup- 
 ported by Government as has grown up in Ontario ; and President 
 Gilman and others in the United States expect the entire mass of 
 denominational colleges to sink into a secondary position, or rather 
 to recognize the fact that they now occupy only a secondary posi- 
 tion ; and that in the university work of the future they must be 
 content to be feeders to half a dozen great national universities. 
 No one Avho is intimate with the history and resources of some of 
 these denominational colleges can expect such a result. A unifi- 
 cation of the higher education of the United States I do not expect 
 along this line. If ever it is reached it implies the extinction of 
 the denominational colleges as fountain heads of national thought. 
 They will become mere distributors of that which emanates from 
 the great centres. 
 
 But this is a question of the future, and of the future of the 
 United States and not of Canada. Our position differs from that 
 of the United States in this, that we have laid the foundations of 
 a national system complete in itself, from the Kindergarten to the 
 Univereity. We must either find a place for the denominational 
 colleges in that system (and federation offers them such a place 
 at the fountain head of intellectual and moral influence of the 
 whole system), or else they must be content to work their way in 
 solitary independence outside the common unity of the national 
 system. If any one else can solve the problem of their incorpora- 
 tion in some more satisfactory way, I shall be quite content to 
 step aside and permit him to make the attempt. The past history 
 
6 
 
 Some Further Fact ft 
 
 of the question docs not seem to me to afford him very f^rcat en- 
 couragement. Tlie opponents of federation think this task is 
 accomplished, if they can prove that some moderately efficient 
 form of inde|)endence is possible. They forget that for the Meth- 
 odism of the future independence may not be a blessing if it 
 separates them from the common literary brotherhood of their 
 .fellow-citizens, and fosters a spirit of narrow suspicion toward 
 those with whom they must dwell in a common country. They 
 forget, too, that another independent university may be still less 
 of a blessing to the country at large, if it limits the free and full 
 growth of such a common university as our country is able to 
 8usta:n. 
 
 (3) But to return to our estimate of cost. The third considera- 
 tion in estimating the number of professors necessary is the com- 
 petition which we must meet. Now, that is a very different thing 
 to-day from what it was in the summer of 1886. At that date 
 Toronto University, including the School of Practical Science, 
 had a staff of nine professors, three tutors, and six lecturers — 
 eighteen in all. To-day, her staff embraces thirteen professors, 
 eight lecturers, and eight fellows, coverirfg fifteen distinct do 
 partments, to which are added five collateral sub-departments. 
 
 In 1886, Queen's was furnished with a staff of eight professors 
 and eight lecturers and tutors, covering ten departments. To-day, 
 she has twelve professors and eight lecturers and tutors, covering 
 thirteen departments. In 1886, Latin and Greek History and Eng- 
 lish Literature, French and German, and in one instance Mathema- 
 tics and Physics, were united in single departments, and in some 
 cases manned by a single lecturer or tutor. Now these are every- 
 where separated, in most cases with separate professors, or at least 
 with a strong lecturer in charge. The estimate which in 1886 
 would have placed us in advance of sister institutions, would be 
 entirely inadequate for that purpose to-day. The subdivision of 
 work, instead of being at the maximum in 1886, has advanced 
 by fully one-third in the last three years in Ontario at least, and 
 is scarcely at its maximum yet. The learned lecturer who has 
 travelled his thousands of miles to gather his facts in a foreign 
 land has been utterly blind to what is going on at his own doors. 
 And even in the foreign land where he discovered that options 
 have reached their maximum, he forgot to inquire, or at least 
 to tell us, what that maximum was, and how it compares with the 
 more conservative position of our Canadian universities. 
 
 The sum of all this is, that to maintain an independent univer- 
 sity to-day in our surroundings, we require the following staff: 
 A professor each in Latin, Greek, Orientals, English, French, 
 
Concerning Federation. 7 
 
 German, Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Geology and 
 Mineralogy, Metaphysics, Moral Philosophy, and History and 
 Civil Polity, fourteen professors in arts, with two in Theology, 
 giving us a staff of sixteen in all. 
 
 In estimating the amount which we now require for indepen- 
 dence, we must also take into account an increased debt, and a 
 reduced rate of interest, calling for a larger endowment than was 
 needed thice years ago. 
 
 Now about other estimates, I need not quarrel with Mr. Allen. 
 In 1886, 1 asked only $24,000 to repair the old buildings and make 
 proper additions to library and apparatus. I shall now gladly 
 accept his offer of $20,000 for apparatus and library. And as I, too, 
 have since travelled, and have seen something of the attention paid 
 in other colleges to physical health and comfort, I shall ask for 
 $50,000, a part of which I should propose to spend in finishing the 
 basement of Faraday Hall, building a wing absolutely needed for 
 a working laboraiory in Chemistry, and putting in lower ceilings 
 tc Make the comfortable and economical heating of the building 
 possible. With the other part I should add a chapel and some 
 additional commodious lecture rooms to the old building, put the 
 whole building in thorough repair, and furnish both buildings 
 with modern ventilation and heating throughout. 
 
 We are now prepared for a revised estimate of the present cost 
 of independence in Cobourg : 
 
 1. To cover debt, improvements to buildings, libraiy 
 
 and apparatus ^120,000 
 
 2. Required income, 10 professors $32,000 
 
 Library apparatus, care of buildings, la- 
 boratories, and incidentals $8,000 
 
 $40,000 
 Less fees and Educational Society 10,000 
 
 $30,000 
 At six per cent $500,000 
 
 $620,000 
 To this we have assets 146,000 
 
 Leaving to be raised $477,000 
 
 If I reckon endowment at five per cent, interest, we must add 
 
 $100,000 more. 
 
 Now, in all this I have followed Mr. Allen's figures wherever he 
 favours us with any. In all other things I have been governed 
 by the actual facts as they exist in neighbouring institutions in 
 
 
8 Some Juirther Factn 
 
 our own country. These figures will be quite sutticient to expose 
 the utter fallacy of the last ten papres of Mr. Allen's pamphlet. The 
 estimate presented in 1886 is no guide in 1890. Had the friends 
 of independence come forward with .1300,000 in 1886, independ- 
 ence would have been fairly possible, though, like Queen's, we 
 should have been asking for another quarter of a million by this 
 time. But to say that what would do in 1886 will serve now, id 
 to reckon without the facts. Now let us turn to independence in 
 Toronto : 
 
 1. For debt, e(|uipment, and reinoval from Cobourg, siiy $100,000 
 For new buildings 250,(XKj 
 
 2. Add to annual exi)enditure 26 per cent. . .f60,(K)() 
 Less Educational Society and fees 10,000 
 
 $40,0(K) 
 Rocjuiring endowment at (> per cent 670,(X)0 
 
 $1,020,000 
 Less present assets 145,000 
 
 To be raised $865,000 
 
 Less Mr. Gooderham's beijuest 200, 0(X) 
 
 But some will be ready to say, does not the requirement for 
 federation also need revision ? It does, but very slightly. The 
 requirements of Mr, Gooderham's will may make our buildings 
 and equipment more costly, and our debt is larger, thanks in 
 part to the men who are putting us to the heavy expense of liti- 
 gation : 
 
 For debt and new buildings we may now estimate . . $350,000 
 
 Annual expenditure, 10 professors $25,000 
 
 Incidentals 5,000 
 
 $30,000 
 Less Educational Society and fees 10,000 
 
 $20,00(J 
 Recjuiring endowment at 6 per cent $340,000 
 
 — ■■ # 
 
 $690,000 
 Less present assets 145,000 
 
 $545,000 
 To which there is now subscribed and bequeathed . . 435,000 
 
 Leaving to be secured $110,000 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
Concerning Feilvration. 
 
 9 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 Now tlieae are the present facts : 
 
 We liavo yot to raifle for iiidepoiultince in Cobourg .... $477, (XK) 
 
 For indopondunce in Toronto (M}r>,()(K) 
 
 For federation 110,000 
 
 These in each case are net sums. 
 
 But all this, Mr. Allen insinuates, is based upon a perversion of 
 the system of options which the hijfher intellig-ence of the age is 
 just about to discard. And he callh our attention to the examples 
 of Johns Hopkins and Yale as the patterns of the conservative 
 type by which we should mend the perversity of our ways. Our 
 estimates are based upon the standard univereity curriculum of 
 this Province, now virtually in force in Toronto, Queen's and 
 Victoria. Has Mr. Allen taken the trouble to compare this currl 
 culum carefully with his two conservative types? I trow not. 
 Here, again, he might have learned something nearer home. 
 
 1. He has learned that Johns Hopkins provides seven parallel 
 courses, allowing the student his choice among the seven. He 
 does not seem to have learned that in each of these so-called fixed 
 courses there are subordinate options, extending in some cases to 
 one-third the course. Now let us compare this with che present 
 course of Toronto University, Avhich virtually governs our pro- 
 vincial curriculum, and is the bete noir of Mr. Allen and his friends 
 in view of federation. Toronto now offers seven distinct honour 
 courses, in each of which there is far less optional matter than is 
 found in any of the seven courses of Johns Hopkins. Our Cana- 
 dian curriculum for honour students is quite as conservative as 
 that of Johns Hopkins. For pass students it is far more rigid, 
 especially in Toronto. Victoria and Queen's allow a little more 
 latitude, but in no case do they equal the liberty allowed by the 
 seven courses of Johns Hopkins. The Canadian pass course is 
 virtually twofold ; a classical course, with Latin, Greek and He- 
 brew ; and a modern course, with Latin, French and German. The 
 variations from this are not greater than are allowed in some of 
 the seven fixed courses of the Johns Hopkins. Next, let us com- 
 pare our Canadian curriculum with that of Yale. In Yale, during 
 the firet two years, Latin, Greek, Mathematics, English for one 
 year are fixed subjects. French and German are optional, and 
 there is no Hebrew or Science. In Toronto, and Ontario generally, 
 Latin, Greek, Mathematics, Science and one year's English are 
 fixed; Greek and Hebrew, French and German are optional, 
 
 In Yale, during the third year. Physics, Astronomy, Logic and 
 Psychology are fixed. In the senior year. Psychology, Ethics and 
 
10 
 
 Some Further Facts 
 
 Theism are fixed subjects. For the balance of his work during 
 these two years each student has an option among ninety-five 
 subjects. 
 
 To sum up : In Yale, out of the sixty hours a week of the four 
 years' pass course, twenty-five are optional. The five hours in the 
 first two yeara are defined options. The twenty hours in the 
 last two year*- as ^adefinite as in the "free-lunch" system of 
 Harvard, and embrace selections from the lectures of thirty-three 
 different professors. In Toronto, of the sixty hours a week of the 
 four years' pass course, options are allowed to the same extent of 
 twenty-five hours a week. These options are all strictly defined. 
 Twenty hours out of the twenty-five consist in a choice between 
 two Ancient and two Modem Languages ; two hours of a choice 
 between three Sciences, and the balance of an option between 
 Metaphysics and Mathematics. Our provincial course then, so far 
 as pass men are concerned, is on the whole more conservative than 
 that of Yale, and Yale is the most conservative of the leading 
 American universities. 
 
 Let us now compare the Yale course with our own on the point 
 of specialism. Specialization is a matter quite distinct from 
 options. Options, as allowed it some of the American colleges, 
 may completely destroy the character and defeat the end of a 
 university coui'se, and yet may not make a man a specialist. 
 In the ordinary course, about one-half the time of the student is 
 devoted to Languages and Literature, and by this course he is 
 brought into contact with the best models of thought and ex- 
 pression, ancient and modern, and his style of thought and 
 expression is moulded accordingly. The other half is devoted to 
 the close, deductive reiisoning of Mathematics, to the inductive 
 study of Science, and to the broad generalizations and first princi- 
 ples of Philosophy. And the object of this balanced course is the 
 development of the full intellectual manhood. It is the higher, or 
 rather the highest, education. If options are carefully guarded, 
 they need not interfere with this. For instance, considerable 
 freedom of option may be allowed as between various languages 
 and literature, though some think that the Greek literature with 
 its philosophy and its deep human sympathies is a sine qua non. 
 A choice may be allowed between four or five fundamental 
 branches of science which press for recognition ; and in both 
 Mathematics and Philosophy th3 field has now become so broad, 
 that a choice must be made either by the university or by the 
 student. This we conceive to be the rational basis and the proper 
 limit of options ; and within these limits, and on this ba^^'s, may be 
 safely used to suit the tastes or prospective wants of the student. 
 
Concerning Federation. 
 
 11 
 
 The entire scheme of university, or perhaps, I should rather call 
 it college, outfit which I have estimated in this paper, provides for 
 nothing beyond this reasonable limit. It provides for the six most 
 important languages (three ancient and three modern languages), 
 absolutely needed under our present circumstances. It provides 
 a limited course in Mathematics and Physics, and iii three impor- 
 tant branches of Science ; and it affords instruction in the two 
 great branches of Philosophy, and in History and Civil Polity. 
 There are no (fainties in this bill of fare, but simply the substantial 
 necessaries, with such variety as is absolutely demanded by our 
 present wants. But specialism looks in quite another direction 
 from that which we have been considering. Its object is not cul- 
 ture or intellectual development, but learning. A man desires 
 such a perfect knowledge of some one department as will enable 
 him to turn it to practical account as a teacher, or in some other 
 line of practical life. 
 
 Now, it is very easy to say that a college should pay no atten- 
 tion to specialties in its undergraduate course, but that these, as 
 professional in their character, should be entirely relegated to a 
 post-graduate course. This would certainly be desirable. And 
 some would consider it desirable that this post-graduate course 
 should always be taken in the Old World. But practically neither 
 the one nor the other is always or even frequently possible. Nor 
 is that latter necessary, nor perhaps even desirable. It is not 
 necessary, because if we wisely economize our forces we can do the 
 work at home. It is not desirable, because such a course, like the 
 importation of all our manufactures from abroad, would prevent 
 our ever reaching the full development of our own national man- 
 hood. Now, in attempting to make this provision for specialism in 
 our Ontario universities, we have so far been forced to attempt to 
 provide for it in the B. A. course. We have limited specialism to 
 honour men. And, as in the options of the pass course, these 
 honour courees are each carefully defined, and the attempt is 
 made to secure the breadth of true univerrity culture with the 
 special learning in some one d ^artment which will fit a man to 
 be a teacher or a practical worker in that department. Even 
 Yale, with its large resources, has not passed altogether beyond 
 this method of specialism. It also offera special honours in seven 
 departments at graduation, and students seeking these honours 
 are specially provided for in the ninety-five optional courees 
 already referred to. The practical result of this system is quite 
 in the line of our Ontario system. But no educator can regard this 
 system as sufficient in itself to provide for the special learning 
 required by the country. In so far as it does so it unduly limits 
 
12 
 
 Some Further Facta 
 
 the general culture. Or if the general culture is maintained, the 
 special training is too limited. Hence the necessity for the post- 
 graduate courses pi'ovided for by Yale. 
 
 But the moment we mention post-graduate courses, we are told 
 that our country is too young for post-graduate courses, and that 
 a full generation must pass by before we are in a position to do 
 anything on that line. And yet Yale, Mr. Allen's type of conser- 
 vative perfection in method of university work, has had her post- 
 graduate courses for a quarter of a century. They%ire, of couree, 
 not the post-graduate courses of (Germany, nor are they such imi- 
 tations of Germany as are g'ven in Johns Hopkins. But they 
 serve the American teacher and the practical American scientist 
 quite as well as either. There are seven of these courses, each 
 extending over three years : the first year being chiefly the honour 
 work in Yale of the corresponding department in the senior year, 
 but required of all students Avho have not taken that honour work 
 or its equivalent. The course results in the degree of Ph.D., and 
 the student who has done it justice is fairly well equipped to 
 teach his department in any intcmediate school or in the ordi- 
 nary college. 
 
 Now this is the post-graduate course which the advocates of 
 federation have before their minds for Ontario, not a mere system 
 of examination with paper degrees; but first, a remodelling of the 
 honour course, broadening and strengthening its fixed elements, 
 and reducing its special line of study in proportion ; and then add- 
 ing two years of work under able professors, for the special benefit 
 of teachers and others who require special learning in one particu- 
 lar branch of knowledge. I do not say that this is an ultimatum, 
 and that the day will not come when Ontario may furnish to her 
 own sons, and to the sons of the other younger provinces, all that 
 Germany now offers. But the full advantages for post-graduate 
 special study now offered at Yale might be furnished in Toronto 
 under federation within five years. Such provision would at 
 once add to the efficiency of our High Schools and Collegiate 
 Institutes; it would give higher power to our whole educational 
 system ; and it would furnish the Province with trained scientists 
 for the better development of our rich natural resources. 
 
 The great difficulty which has prevented such provision in the 
 past has been our divisions and sectional jealousies. But now 
 that the Province is thoroughly alive to the importance of this 
 matter, such provision will be made, and those who stand outside 
 and refuse to accept their natural share in these provisions, must 
 be content to occupy a secondary position in the intellectual life 
 of our country ; some such position as President Gilman designates 
 
 
Concerning Federation- 
 
 13 
 
 as the appropriate sphere of the denominational colleges ; or, as 
 another eminent educational authority recently pointed out, as 
 the sphere of the countrij colleges. Such a position the Christian 
 Church cannot afford to occupy. Such a position I am persuaded 
 the Methodist Church of this country will not consent to occupy. 
 Christianity must make its influence fully felt at the very foun- 
 tain head of our higher intellectual life. And, unless I um mis- 
 taken, Methodism is determined to do her full share in this great 
 work. 
 
 It has been one of the standing complaints of the opponents of 
 federation that it will reduce the field of work open to us. The 
 whole tenor of Mr. Allen's argument is to show how little is 
 needed for independence. All that we need is a little cheap 
 apparatus and a few cheap books (and he would not, I am sure, 
 think of adding a few .cheap professors), and we can have an 
 independent university. We can dispense with all our options 
 and limit ourselves to two courses, a literary and a scientific. 
 That is true. We can do that. But if we do it, our graduates 
 will be excluded from the teaching profession, we will lose our 
 students, and our position will be very speedily reduced to that 
 of a "mere theological school," and that in a little rural town. 
 No. Wherever we do our work, and under whatever policy, we 
 must provide for our sons all that can be had elsewhere. We 
 must furnish them with no cheap mediocrity, but the very best 
 that the land can afford. And it is the chief advantage of federa- 
 tion that it will enable us to do this more efficiently, more econo- 
 mically, and with a wider influence for good, both to our country 
 and to ourselves, than any other scheme.