W \t ^. IT IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) (/ ^^ '»''>> .^T^ 11.25 U< Ui2 12.2 H; !«£ 12.0 U 116 I ^ ^^^} V >" Photographic Sciences Corporation 1 m ^^ f ^, ^.'V '^'°^'^^' ^ ^^.V^ v\ 23 WEST MAIN STREIT WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 873-4503 .^ Technical and tibllographlc NotM/NotM tcchnlquM ct MbliographiquM The Inctitut* hM attamptMl to obtain tho boat original copy available for Miming. Pooturoa of thia copy which may bo bibliographieally unique, which may altar any of tho imagoo in tha raproduction, or which may significantly change the uaual method of filming, are choohed b elow. Coloured covers/ Couverturo do couleur rn Covers damaged/ D D D Couverturo endommagdo Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverturo reotaurAo at/ou pelllcuMo □ Cover title missing/ Le titre do couverturo manque □ Coloured mapa/ Cartea g4k>graphlquaa en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre do couleur (i.o. autre que Meue ou noire) □ Coloured plataa and/or illuatratlona/ Planchee et/ou illuatratlona en couleur □ Bound with other material/ RelM avoc d'autrae documents Tight binding may eauae shadowa or diatortion along interior mergin/ Lareliure serrie pout cauaar da I'ombre ou do la diatorsion ki kmg do la marge intirlouro Blank leavea added during restoration may appear within the text. Whoiuivor possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II so pout que eertainee pages blanches ajout^oa lore d'uno restauration apparalaaent dana le toxte. mala, loraque cola itait poaaible. coo pagoa n'ont pea «t« filmAos. Q Additional commonta:/ Commentairea supplAmentaires; Vsrioui psgingi. L'fnetltut a mierofllmA le molNour exemplaire qu'il lui a *tA possible do so procurer. Los dAtaiis do cot OKomploire qui sent pout-Atro uniques du point do vue bibliogrephique. qui pouvent modifier uno imege roproduivo. ou qui pouvent exiger une modifleatlon dana la mAthodo normele do filmage sont Indlqu4a cl-doaaoua. rn Coloured pagoa/ D This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ca document est filmA au taux da reduction indlquA ci-dessous. 10X 14X 18X 22X f * a gee do couleur Pagee damaged/ Pagee ondommagAoa □ Pagea reetored and/or laminated/ Pagea reatauriee et/ou polliculAos Q Pagoa discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pagea dAcolories, tachet^es ou piquAes Pagea detached/ Pagea ditachtes Showthrough/ Transparence Quality of prin Quallt* InAgalo do i'impression Includes supplementary materii Comprend du material suppl4mantaire Only edition available/ Seule Mition disponible Tho toti Tho ofti film Orig □ Pagea detached/ Pagea r~n Showthrough/ rn Quality of print varies/ |~n Includes supplementary material/ rn Only edition available/ tho aion otho firat alonJ or ill Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc.. have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Los peges totalement ou partieilement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure, etc., ortt *ti filmiea A nouveau da faqon A obtiiiir la meilleure image possible. Tho ahoM TINi whic Map diffo ontir bogh right roqui moti 26X 30X y 1 12X ItX aox 24X 28X 32X TIm oofnf fHiiMd hmm hat b««n raproduead thankt to tiM OMMTMlty of: Notlofiol Library of CaiMHto L'oxomptaira fNm4 f ut raproduh grioo i !■ fwMfooHo dot BIMIothAquo notlonolo du Canada qualHv lofllMNtv tho Tho Imagaa a p paaHwg hora ara tho poMlblo conoModng tho eondltlon of tho origliMil copy ond In hooping filming contract apoolf Icatlona. Original oopioa In printod papor eovora ara fllmod boghmtoig with tho front eovor and aiHlIng on tho loot paga wHh a printad or INuatratod Impraa* •Ion. or tho book eovor wvhon opproprlata. AN othor origlnol eoploo ora fllmod boglnnlng on tho f Iret pogo with a printad or IHuotratad Impraa- •Ion, and anding on tho loot paga wHh a printad or illuatrotod improoalon. Tho loot rooordod framo on oaoh microfloho •hoN oontoln tho oymbol — »■ (mooning "CON- TINUED"), or tho oymbol ▼ (moaning "END"), whichovor appllao. Laa Imagao aulvontoo ont 4t4 roprodultoo ovoe lo pkM grond •oin, eompto tonu do lo eondltlon ot do lo nottoti do I'oxomplolra fllm4. ot on eonf ormit* avac laa eondltlona dii eontrot do fUmaga. Laa axamplalraa orlglnoux dont la eouvortura on poplor oot Imprimdo aont fHmte on .eommon^ont por lo promlor plot ot on tormlnont aoH por lo domMra pogo qui eomporto uno omprointo d'improoolon ou dlNuotratlon. aolt par lo aoeond plot, colon lo eaa. Toua laa autrac axamplalrac orlglnoux oont fHmte an eommon^ant par la promMra pogo qui eomporto uno omprointo d'improaaion ou d'lHuctratlon ot on tormlnont par la damMra paga qui eomporto uno toNo omprointo. Un doc aymboloa auhranta apparattra cur la damlOra Image do cImkiuo mierofleho, colon io eac: lo cymbolo ^ clgnHIo "A SUIVRE". lo cymbolo ▼ cignlflo "FIN". IMapc, platac, chartc, etc.. may bo fllmod at different reduction ratloc. Thoeo too lorge to bo entirely Included in one expoeura ara filmed beginning in the upper left bond comer, loft to right and top to bottom, ae many framae aa requirad. The following diagramc iiluetrato tho method: Lea cartae. planchoc, taMeaux. etc., pouvont Atra fllmte A doc taux da rAduetlon diff Arentc. Lorcquo lo document cot trop grand pour Atra roproduH on un coui cUehd, II oct fllmA A partir da i'anglo aupAriour goucho. do gauche A droite, ot do haut en baa. en prenont lo nombre d'Imagee nAcocealra. Lee diagrammec cuivanta iiluctrent la mAthodo. 32X 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 ^. •f -^■«, ;;-^v''"^ip»» SBVERAlJ HUE PRUi RKPOBTS Hi-] 7 OF SBVERAL SKLECT COMMITTEES OF THE LEOISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE LATE rilOVlNCB OF CANADA, THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, AND THE LEOISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO. ON THE HUBON & ONTARIO SHIP CANAL TORONTO: PRINTED BY HUNTER, ROSE & COMPANY, 86 AND 88 KING ST. WEST. 1871. .ft". , m HIS THE FOLLOWING COLLECTION PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS ON THE 8VUJECT OK THE HUHON AND ONTARIO SHIP CANAL, ' BXTlUCnO CBIirLY ntOM TUI JOVHNALH or TUB LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF CANADA, or 7UZ COMMONS OF THE DOMINION, AND OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO, IS RKSPECTFULLY DEDICATED TO HIS EXCELLENCY BARON LISGAR, GOVERNOR-GENERAL, G.C.B. &0., *lC., &(.'., • AND THE PEOPLE OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA. BY THEIR FAITHFUL SERVANT, F. C. CAPREOL. THE HURON AND ONTARIO SHIP CANAL CO. I • m • GKAMIMW n Am M lUAMWT, ID * M Vie. cir. U>; ui» t» Vw. o*r. U. CAPITAL $40,000,000. / FnEDERio C. Cai'RKOL, Eaquiro, Prosident. W. J. Macdonkix, Esquire. Honorable Donald McDonau), Senator. Thomas R Fkiuiuson, Esquire, M.P.P. Thomas Orahamk, Eaquiro, M.P.P. Adam Chocks, Emiuire, Q.C. Henky FoWLKll, Esquire. John Hawkshaw, Esquire, C.E., F.R.S., Loudon, A. M. Rrndel, Esquire, C.K, London. William Sykes, Esquire, C.E., Toronto. A. LuDERS Light, C.E, Woodstock. Messrs. Crickmoue, Boyd & Stayner. ALCO. tif. u. Tc//is Exeeiiency Baron Lisgar, Govtrnor-Gentral, G.C.U., G.C.?f,G.t &c., &c., &c. Toronto, the 31it JAnuary, 1871. My Tx)IU), In roiipmtAilly di-dlcAtlng to Your T.or(I«hip, and tho pAopIfl, tho following |mblio document^, on tho •uhj<>ot of thn Hun>n and Ontario Hliip (>«nal, I am coniitrain«d to do ' 10 from A fneling of duty I owe to ovttr 200,000 ixaitionuni, to thoHr- I rnpn^aont, and to mytcif I could Hay nin< 1' inoro, hut I havo «!nd*>uvoun>f a« tMwnihlu, Aa chiitf Kxocutivo ( irllcor of tho Huron and Ontario Ship (..'anal Company, om- powcrml hy authority ol tho board undor thn Hnal of tho OumpAriy, I am in po»> Muion of factfl, from thn opinionH of two nf tho moiit nminont engirii-««rH in tlie world, Mr. John Hawksbaw and Mr. A. M. Uondull, baaed on tho ablu report, plauH and lurvo/ of Mr. Wm. HylcPH, Hubniittcd to thorn, and I fearloNMly iwutert that tho IIURUN AND Ontario Sim* Canal ih yuiTK i>RA(mrAui.i<:. I am also in poaHesaioii of plan* which will Icmcu tho doop cutting in the ridge«, ono hundred feot, Having, in tho «)x|MtiiHt) of con«tnintion, at luaitt $4,000,000. Th« canal proper would b« but nixty mih'H. It will aUo nave, in distance, over 800 mihrn, botwtion tho uppnr lukoH and Liverpool, for vesaols of 1,200 tons bunion, via tho St. Lawrence, and a saving of timo viA the Krio Danal and Now York of 14 to 10 days, and with tho preHcnt amount of freight, an annual saving of £2,400,000 sterling, or al>out $12,000,000. The canal can bo constructed in less than fivn years, all preliminaries 1)cing arrangod, giving employment to many thou»and itersons. The Huron and Ontario Ship Canal will secure to thn Dominion of (Janiula tlin fant increasing carrying trade of the great West and the North WcRt, making Canada tho star of attraction of the world for capitaliHtH, and emigrants seeking employment. A bonus of 10,000,000 of acren of wild lands would have, and may yet, secure its construction. Opposition and difficulties I expected, as I did in the initiation of railroads in this country ; but I overcame them, ami he is a bold man who will deny that tho construction of railroads has not materially assisted in making Canada what she now is. In the newspaper reports of tho 28th June, 1848, of a public meeting held in Toronto, for the construction of the now calletl Northern Railroad, Mr. C. S. Ozowski, in his speech on that occasion, stated that plank and macadamised roads would bo suffi- cient for Canada for tho next 30 years, and that it was insanity and weakness in any ono to think of railroads. At the same meeting, although others opposed me, I sturdily and forcibly advocated railroa«ls. The result speaks for itself. Quero t If Mr. GzoAvski so erred in his jui*m>U of i» loiumn'' In'fon' nftmr lioiioitr of iiitffrviffwn (thritiiuli frii'iiilly iiiti'iHtiiiliiiiH) Mttit tS<* Ooviiriuni'titii of Fntiiri<, Kii^lniul, niitl thn lJiiit(«rStiiti"<, .11 ui'll III \i»ttt'i| tlix |triiii'i|Mtl t'omini>ri;iul citii'« in Kn^laiul aikI ihn Uniti'il Sut>'<, r.illi'.'tiiii' ntritiiiticM nntl |i<>Ai>i'<lf of ■iicli ntnrlinK inforniatiun wliirli liailH iii<< til lM'lti tliiit till' ivri'ipu III' till* iivtml will nturn a ri>miiiii^ cnititAl niimt coini*) tlint howi'vcr linlliiint the |ii'iiH|i<>t'tt niiiy In< nimlo to ii|)|M*ikr for n pnitltnlilo invi<«tmnnt, Nui'li lm«n((iiut< mont ii'liiilil(< runtroctoM in Kntfliiinl mil tlii< I iiiti'il Stati-i, ih \vi<]i n-* tli>< liMilin;; ciipiUiliHti of (iri'tit liritnin, for nrgixiiitiiij; till' fliiiiiuiitl nrraiigi'iiinit^ loi xn ;;i'i>iit nml tiiu'fiil lUi «nti'r|>riMi<. To ^iM< Voiii- K\t-(a of tlir rontiActor I liml nci-iirt'il ill Kii;{l:uiil, liii coMtractii in imliii niul <>lMM|iiir(>il Uil.DOO i iii|)Iii}oi'm hii liin monthly pay li»t, dinco whicii I li),irn that 111' ami Mr. ilawk'ilMW \m'h> M'lit fur iiy tim I'anlui of Kp;ypt to cunnnlt on n rnnal roiiiiiiiiniration with tlii> ii|ip('i- \ili>, u iliHtaiicu of 1,100 niili-M, at an I'Mtiinated coHt of X17,O0(»,()(){) HtiTliiij;. Till' ii'iiii'.si'iitativi'K i)f New lii'iiiiswii-k ami Xovft Scotia aro awaro of niy lU'itiro to Ht'i) arconipliHlu >| tlm May Vi rtn Canal. I wan alsii an lulvoralt' for tlio con.'^tnictiiin of tlio Sanlt Sto. Marin Canal, iliii'in{(, nnd Hinci>, tlio lat<> Mc^'*!'*. Lifonlaino an>l llililwin adniiniNtrntion, ami I am Ntill of opinion itji cDiiHtnu'tion (iii;;lit to ho ciiminiiu'cil iinnn'ilialf'ly, to complotn n linu of n Rhip canal, tlirunj;,li Ilritish t< rritmy, frnni the Day nf Fnmly to the hcail of Lake Superior, iiml liiiiilly on tn tho SiiHkairhi'w:in. Ami had I Iteen honoured hy living one of tlio Caiiiil CdiiitniM.'.iDiiriM, 1 ain conlideiit I cuiild have Hii^^^'e.itcd a plan for obtaining the capital ri'ipiiinl for all tlirso worh.s fur n ptTiod of yeais, without requiring the rctuni of any of the piiiu-ipal. Iloldin.;^ in yreat icHpect and ndniiiation the abilities of tlio Rev. Wm. Alorley run.sliDii, I lU'siri', befurr clo.sin;.{, to ([iiole the words of hi.<4 lotter to me, on thu canal project. "Toronto, February 12, 1870. " My Dr.Aii Siii, — I nin not aide to be present at tlio nioetini; to-nif{lit on the matter wliieli you h;ivi' mo nuuli at heart, and moreover it in not my jirovinei.' to Hpeak to tlio citizi'iiH of Toruito on purely setuliir (|iie?o an init>artl«| iuilur, whiln thu ii4tancii gkfn m« by McMrs. l&aty and iIarri«on, thn rcpr«HentativPi of Toronto, in tlir noniinion I'arlia* inent, and thn many meml>er« of tho Kc>nato and ('•minioni in biingitiif ao promimmtly before the Uovernmmt of tho Dominion the cmini iinmtion, iim wrll a« MrMrt. Lount (of Himcoc), (Jrahanip (of York), and othflr«|of tho Ontario AuMniibl^, for tli«>ir efforta in rndi^avouring to lighten my hurculcan tank to oNciconi)) tho oppn-titioii of tho Ontario Lcgislatuti'. I havo tho honour to bo, , Your ExcolI«»nry'H auil tho people'* mont obdt. and humblo ^orvant, FUKI). C. CAPUEOL EEPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE or THE LATB LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 9th JUNE, 1857. The Select Committee to which w«g referred the Petition of Rowland Burr, of the City of Toronto, on the subjedt of a Canal to connect the Georgian Bay, on Lake Haron^ with the waters of Lake Ontario, at Toronto, hare the honor to report : — That in obedience to the order of your Honourable House, and in compliance with the prayer of the Petitioner, they have had Mr. Burr before them, and have obtained from him such evidence, verbal and written, ai he was prepared to submit ; a portion of which is hereto appended. From Mr. Burr's testimony it appears that he has, with commendable zoal, and in the exercise of a liberal public spirit, and at his own cost, within the month of May last, caused a survey to be made, by a competent engineer, of so much of the country in the line of the projected Canal as lies between Lakes Simcoe and Ontario, and is above the level of the former. From this survey, which is eight miles in length, and embraces the most important difficulty to be overcome, it is found that the greatest depth of cutting to reach the level of Lake Simcoe will not exceed 175 feet, that throughout the greater part of this distance the depth will not average 40 feet, and that from the nature of the excavation, the cost will be much h'ss than in ordinary heavy cuttings on the most important public works of this and the adjoining county. The magnitude of the obstacles to be surmounted in uniting the waters of Lakes Huron and Ontario by a direct Canal communication, seems hitherto to have deterred those most deeply interested from such a thorough investigation of the claims cf this pro- ject upon public attention as to Your Committee it appears to merit. The present outlets to the trade of the Up^er Lakes, through tiio Erie and Welland Canals, are already found inadequate, notwithstanding that trade is yet in its infancy. That sufficient iacilities can be afforded by any probable enlargement of both those works, but few at all conversant with the interior of the resources of this vast continent, drained by our unrivalled Lakes and Rivers, will assert. New channels, more direct, and less dangerous and difficult, will be sought. Speed as well as safety is necessary to successful competition with our neighbours in the carrying trade. The shortest route, and that which presents the least interruption to the progress of vessels propelled by steam, or otherwise, in passing from the safe navigation of the St. Lawrence and Lake Ontario to the equally safe navigation of Lakes Huron, Michigan and Superior, Avill be fodnd by & Canal crossing the neck of land between Toronto and Georgian Bay. The only obstacle which may at all be considered of an extraordinary character, is the ridge dividing the waters of Lake Simcoe from those of Lake Ontario. When the largest Canals did not ex- ceed the dimensions necessary for the passage of boats carrying at most one or two hun- dred tons burden, the depth of cut necessary to pass that ridge might well be considered insurmountable ; but at this day when channels are required for vessels of the largest class freighted for ocean voyages, and %vith the aid of science and »kill, reducing the la- bor of years to the eflFort of days, your Committee submit that a depth of cut not exceed- ing the greatest on this line cannot be looked upon as presenting an obstacle more formid- able than the means in hand will justify. Aside from the importance of the carrying trade of the North-western States of the Union, which your Committee believe will, of itself, fully justify the construction of the work in question, there are other and, in our view, more patriotic considerations, favoring 1 I 9 3, 1857. i Burr, of the Lake Haron, tpliance with lave obtainad a portion of zoal, and in of May last, ountry in the 1 is above the )8t important >ach the level this distance tion, the cost iblic works of ;crs of Lakes lavo deterred s of this pro- and Welland I its infancy, those works, nent, drained •ect, and less to successful ite, and that by steam, or e Ontario to found by a )nly obstacle dividing the s did not ex- or two hun- e considered ' the largest iicing the la- 1 not exceed- nore formid- States of the ction of the }ns, favoring immediate and energetic action upon this subject It is hardly necessary to say yoar Committee now allude to the extensive tract of country Ijing to tlie Nortli-wost of Iiiikes Huron and Superior, and alwavs recognized as Canadian soil, as well ns to that portion of our patrimony hitherto held hj the Hudson's Bay Company, This extensive country, rich in mineral and agricultural wealth, will, by the opening of the Toronto and Georgian Bay Canal, be at once fur more tliaii cIoiibltMl in value. In this view of tiio subject alone, your Committee respectfully submit will ha found consid- erations fully justifying the most libend effort on the part of the Govornmeut, and of your Honorable House, for tlio construction of this work. Should the system of granting public lands in aid of public works of a national char- acter be continued, your Committee respectfully submit that no work yt^t projected in Canada has cqu-al claims with the Toronto and Georgian Bay Canal, to a liberal grant. All which is respectfully submitted. Joseph Hautman, CommitteeI Room, C/Mirman. 9th June, 1857. KEPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE OF THE LATE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 3r^ MAY, 1864. The Select Committee appointed to consider the practicability and propriety of con- itinw a Ship Canal between the Georcian Bay and Lake Ontario, via Lake Simcoe, structing a Ship liavo the honour to Report : — That they have received evidence from various parties in reference to the practica- bility and necessity of constructing the proposed Ship Canal, which is herewith submitted. Your Committee also submit the evidence collected by a former Committee appointed for the same pui-pose, and would recommend that the evidence Miould be printed. The question of constructing this great public work has, for a long period, occupied the serious attention of several Municipalities and other parties in the western portion of this Province. On referring to the Journals of your Honourable House, your Committee find that on the 9th of June, 1857, the late Joseph Hartman, Esquire, M.P.P. for North York, pre- sented a Report from t Select Committee appointed to inquire and report on this pro- jected work. . From that document, your Committee quote the following recommendations :— "Aside from the importance of the carrying trade of the North-western States of the Union, which your Committee believe will of itself justify the construction of the work in question, there are other, and in our view, more patriotic considerations favoring im- mediate and energetic action on this subject. , " Should the system of granting public lands in aid of public works of a national character be continued, your Committee respectfully submit that no work yet projected m Canada has equal claims with the Toronto and Georgian Bay Canal, to a liberal grant. Agreeing with these views, your Committee consider that the construction of such a Canal is expedient on national and on Provincial grounds j they are convinced that as an adjunct to the commerce of Canada and the Great West, its value has not been over- stated, and they entertain the opinion that the engineering difficulties, which undeniably ^xist, are by no means insurmountable. , As a national work, the importance of the proposed Canal is obvious. It is a necessary complement to the plans which, at an enormous cost, have enabled 10 I'll tho Britifil) Government to promote the means of travel nnd transportation over a large part of tho Province. Tho oxLiting CnnaU, originally in advance of tho wants of the time, are now deficient. Tho progress of settlement westward, tho development of the vast mineral resources which skirt the northern shores of Huron and Superior, and the certainty that at no dis- tant day, the interests of civilization and commerce, will demand facilities for intorcouno from tlio present terminus of lake navigation to the golden shores of tho Pacific, are cir- cumstances which render tho Georgian Bay Canal a matter which tho Imperial authorities will necessarily entertain with i^avor. Over and above these consiflcrations, are others more strictly military and naval in their character, l}ut of these it is not requisite, perhaps it is not prudent, for your Com- mittee to speak at any length. To tho Province tho project is scarcely loss than vital. Its geo^aphical position points at Canada as the possessor of the first commercial advantages which arc to }>e found in the interior of the American Continent. Even now the produce and minerals of the North-west demand increased facilities for reaching the seaboard, and the business men of Chicago and Oswego are of opinion that a Ship Canal from tho Georgian Bay to Ontario presents attractions of which none else can boast. Your Committee need not i 'dulge in proj^hecy to prove that all arguments, based upon previous commercial wants, are trivial indeed when placed in the balance against tho wants which will bo experienced when a few more years shall have brought out, in a greater degree, the resources of tho immense and fertile region of which this Canal will be the natural outlet. In this regard tho marvels of the past are the best index to the probabilities of the future. That there arc engiuce'rlng obstacles, it Avero folly to deny, Your Committee, how- ever, without entering into details, may be permitted to repeat, that the evidence of com- petent parties appears to demonstrate that nature presents no difiiculties along tho route surveyed which science and perseverance may not overcome at a reasonable cost. Your Committee also find that Petitions from several Municipal bodies, including tho City of Toronto, the Counties of York and Peel, the County of Simcoe, tho Town of Bar- rie and otiiers, have been presented to your Honourable House for a grant of ten millions of acres of public lands to aid in tho construction of this Canal. Your Committee, having a regard to tlie magnitude and importance of this work, venture to indulge the 4iope tliat a gi-ant of land, commensurate with the greatness of tho undertaking will be made to the Toronto and Georgian Bay Canal Company, incorporated in 1856, as one of the best means of securing the construction of tho work, your Cfommit- tee being persuaded tliat without some munificent inducement of this description, it were useless to seek tho co-operation of the capitalists of the parent country, on whom mainly the Province must rely for the practical execution of the enterprise. Your Committee have to express their thanks to L. B. Crocker, Esquire, of Oswego ; Col. R. B. Maso'i, Commissioner of the Illinois Central Railroad ; and William Bross, Esquire, of ^the Press and Tribune, Chicago, for the very important statistics and useful in- formation gratuitously imparted by them for the information of the Committee. Your Committee cannot conclude this Report without expressing thtir appreciation of the liberal spirit displayed by Mr. Kivas Tully, Civil Engineer, in presenting 1250 lithographs for the purpose of explaining the position and advantages of the Georgian Bay Route ; also, for the zeal which he has manifested in preparing the necessary statistics, which, in the opinion of your Committee, will be found valuable for future . reference, clearly demonstrating not only the propriety of improving the present channels, but also the necessity of constructing additional facilities of communication through this Province for the vast and rapidly increasing trade of the West. The whole respectfully submitted. Thojus D. McConkey, Chairman. Committee Room, No. 16, Tuesday, 31st May, 1864. ^ ' n over a large ) wants of the neral resources that at no dis- for intorcourso ^acific, aro cir- rial authorities and naval in for your €om- )hicnl position arc to 1)0 found Ied fiicilitios for f opinion thac lich nunc else jumcnts, hased )alanco against )Hj:;ht out, in a his Canal will ibiliLie.s of the )mmittoe, how- 'idence of coni- long the route ) cost. ), including tho I Town of Bar- of ten millions of this work, reatness of tho y, incorporated your Cfommit- •iption, it were . whom mainly re, of Oswego ; iVilliam Bross, and useful in- btee. r appreciation esenting 1250 I Georgian Bay sary statistics, lUre . reference, anels, but also I this Province KEY, Chamuan. ' I ._ ' SECOXID REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE 0F« THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, ON THE HURON AND ONTAIUO SHIP CANAL. Committee Room, Jiine lith, 18G9. The Selbct CoMMirrEE to whom was referred the Petition of John Gordon and twenty thousand others, of tho Province of Ontario, praying for tho construction of the "Huron and Ontario Ship Canal," M'ith power to send for persons and papers, and to re- port as to tho practicability and expediency of the worlv, have tho honor to report : That this project has, for many years, engaged a large measure of public attention. In 1855, surveys of the route were niado liy Mr. Kivas Tully, C. E , who reported favor- ably thereon, and his report was confirmed by that of Col. K B. Mason, an eminent American Engineer. In 1856, the Parliament of the late Province of Canada, incorpor- ated i». Company with powers to construct the work. In 1857, a select Committee of the Legislative Assembly of the late Province of Canada, was appointed to enquire into and report on the projected work, and on the 0th June, of that year, the Committee, through the late Joseph Hartman, Esq., M. P. P. for North York, reported strongly in favor of the enterprise, and stated that no work yet projected in Canada has equal claims with the proposed Canal to a liberal grant of land. In 18C4, a Select Committee of tho Leg- islative Assembly of the late Province of Canada, was appointed to consider the practica- bility and propriety of constructing this Canal, and on 31st May of that year, that Com- mittee, by their Chairman, Thomas D. McConkey, Esq., M. P. P., reported, approving of the report of the previous Committee, and stating that, to Canada the project is scarcely less than vital, and having regard to the magnitude and importance of tho work, the Committee Buggested that a grant of land commensurate with the importance of the un- dertaking, should be made as one of the best means of securing tho construction of the work. Your Committee have to report that thoy have had submitted to them a largo body of evidence in reference to the expediency and practicability, in an Engineering as well as a financial point of view, of the projected Canal. Your Committee have had under their consideration a full and comprehensive report of 'Mr. William Sykes, C. E., the resident Engineer of the Canal Company, on the general merits of the proposed Canal, containing a large amount of valuable commercial and other statistics bearing on the subject, and a full description of tho Engineering features of the work, and the prospects for traffic to render it remunerative. Mr. Capreol, on l)ehalf of the Canal Company, submitted the proposal of a number ^ of capitalists in the United States, to undertaks one half of the contract for the con- struction, taking in payment one half of the capital Htock of tho Company — say twenty millions of dollars — provided the remaining half bo undertaken by British or other con- tractors, and that the Company be aided by the grant of ten millions acres of land. Your Committee have had submitted to tliem Ictten. from Messieurs, John Hawk- shaw and A. M. Rendel, eminent engineers of London, England, expressing their confi- dence in the pngincering practicability of the work, and from Mr, Georgs Wythcs, a prominent, and reputedly wealthy English contractor, offering to undertake the remain- ing half of the contract for construction, on the basis of the proposal of the United States capitalists already mentioned. Your Committee have also hod submitted to them a number of letters from various parties, i)rominent and well informed in matters of finance, expressing confidently the opinion that, in the present state of the EngliHh i^oney market, the Stock of the Com- pany would be readily taken up, provided that a g^ant of ten millions acres of land were made to tlio Company, but, at the same time, unequivocally stating that, without such grant, the floating of the Stock wonld be impossible at present Your Committee had also important evidence from the Honourable Charles Tupper, C.B., Walter Shanly, C.E., the Honourable John Ross, and the Honourable James Skead, which is submitted herewith. Your Committee beg to report that they have no doubt as to the expediency of the proposed Canal. They are satisfied that, if constructed, it would bo of immense value to the commercial and general interests of the Province of Ontario, and of the whole Diminion of Canada. The interests of Ontario, would be greatly promoted by the local expenditure, aud the development of the extensive region of unoccupied land North and West of the Canal, and the interest of the Dominion, by the introduction into the coun- try of the large amount of capital, estimated at forty millions of dollars, required for its construction ; by the encouragement of immigration ; and by the completion of a most important link in the chain of through communication between the Great West and the Old World. The Canal, if constructed, as it would be wholly within British territory, would be a most important key to the trade of the West, and greatly conduce to the establishment and continuance of reciprocal trade between this Dominion and the United States of America. Independently of these important national, commercial and social consideration, it is obvious to your Committee that a largo accession of revenue must accrue to the Dominion Exchequer, from the construction of this work, as out of an expenditure of forty millions of dollars, chiefly for imported labor, a large amount must flow into the public chest through Customs and Excise. The testimony adduced before your Committee has satisfied them that the work is practicable in an engineering point of view, but that unless a liberal grant of land be given in aid to the Company, the work, in the opinion of your Committee, cannot be accom- plished. The following statement of comparative distances by different routes, shows the great .saving that will be effected by this Canal when constructed : — ' f CHICAGO AND QUEBEC. , Via Lake Erie, the Welland and St. Lawrence Canals 1,560 miles. Via Huron, and Ontario Ship, and St. Lawrence Canals.... 1,180 " Making a saving of 370 " CHICAGO TO NEW YORK. r/a Lake Erie and Erie Canal 1,504 « Fi'a Lake Erie, Welland Canal and Oswego 1,500 " Fta Huron and Ontario Canal and Oswego 1,225 " " |i|ii 18 met for the con- ny — say twenty •h or otlier con- s of land, rs, John Hawk- »ing their confi- nrg9 Wythes, a ke tho remain- of the Uj^itod trs from various confidently the k of the Com- 38 of land were \t, without such IJharles Tupper, lourable James )edioncy of tho immense value d of the whole ted by the local land North and 1 into the coun- required for its 3tion of a most -t West and the Iritish territory, conduce to the and the United isideration, it is o the Dominion f forty millions he public chest hat the work is if land be given nnot be accom- shows the great ) miles. ) " CIIICAUO TO LIVERPOOL. Via Missiasippi and New Orleans 6,000 miles. Via Erie Canal and New York 4,000 " Via Welland Canal and St. Lawrence 4,180 *' Via Huron and Ontario Canal and St. Lawrence 3,730 " And it is shewn, in tho Report of the Canal Company's Engineer, Mr. Sykes, that by the- saving of transhipment, a cargo of 1,000 or 1,200 tons shipped at Chicago for Liverpool Via the Huron and Ontario Canal, would, under ordinary circumstances, reach Liverpool before a similar cargo, shipped at tho same time. Via fiuflalo and £.ie Canal, could reach New York. The relations of the proposed Canal to the North-Wtwt Territory, and the develop- ment of that extensive and valuable portion of the Dominion, are also, in tho opinion uf the Committee, additional reasons for tho undertaking of the work. Tlie necessity for its use would also, it is believed, lead to an international system of Navigation Law Ixttwcon this country and the United States, which would be equally iust to both, and largely stimulate the important industrial Jirancli of ship-building in tiiis Dominion. By means of its construction the river St. Lawrence, which is the natural highway between tho Great West (now rapidly becoming the granary of the world) and the consumers of Ku- rope, would be more used than at present. The consequence would be the necessary en- largement of the St. Lawrence Canals and the acquisition to that noble river of the vast trade which nature intended it to have, but which the energy of man has hitherto, to a large extent, diverted through artificial channels in the neighbouring Republic. By means of the improvements suggested in the navigation of tlie St. Lawrence, and an im- proved system of International Navigation Law, Canada would share, to a large extent, in tho carrying trade of the world, and onr Confederacy would be enriched by the stream of trade which would pass through our territory on its way to the ocean. The which is nevertheless respectfully submitted. ' KOBT. A. Harrison, M.P., Toronto West, Ont., Chairman. The Hon. Cius. CoNNELL, M. P., Carlton, N. B, The Hon. Charles Tupper, M.P., Cumberland, N. S. The Hon. J. H. Gray, M.P., St. John, N. B. The Hon. J. G. Blanchet, M.P., Levis, P. Q. James Metcalfe, M. P., York East, Ont. - James Beaty, M.P., Toronto East, Ont. . , V. Amos Wright, M.P., York West, Ont. G. H. SiMARD, M. P., Quebec Centre, P. Q. L. H. Masson, M.P., Soulanges, P. Q. Thos. D. McConkey, M.P., Simcoe North, Ont. J. P. Wells, M.P., York North, Ont. W. C. Little, M.P., Simcoe South, Ont. George Jackson, M.P., Grey, South, Ont. Thomas R. Ferguson, M.P., Card well, Ont. House op Commons, Committee Room, No. 8, Ottowft, 15th June, 1869. « REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE OF THE I • f ' LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO, , ON THE , , HURON & ONTARIO SHIP CANAL. Wednesday, 22nd December, 1869. * Mr. LouNT, from the Select Committee to which was referred the Petition reUting to the Huron and Ontano Ship Canal, presented its Report, whicli was road, {hut not per- mitted to he moved for adoption, hij the Hon. J. Sandfield Macdonald.)| TnvRHVAY, Juntuirtj 7th, IS7\. . On motion of Mr. Lount, seconded by Mr, Grahaaib (York), Ordered, That the evidence taken at the lost Session of this Parliament, before the Select Committee appointed to inquire into the present position of the Huron and Ontario Ship Canal, and into the practicability and advantage of the proposed work, and also the Report of such Committee, be referred to the Committee on Printing. Wednesday, January 18lh, 1871. Mr. Scorr (Ottawa), from the Committee on Printing, presented their Third Report, which was read as follows : — ^ Your Committee recommend that the following docnmeuts be printed : — ' • Report of the Huron and Ontario Ship Canal Committee of Session 1869 (with evi- dence). — (Appendix No. 1.) Report of Registrar General of Births, &c. — {Sessional Papers No. 27.) , Resolved, That the House do concur in the Third Report of the Committee on Printing. ^ 10. REPORT OF COMMITTEE HURON AND ONTARIO SHIP CANAL THE REPORT NOT ADOPTED BY THE HOUSE. NAL. ion relating but not per- , before the md Ontario nd also the leir Third (with evi- tmittee on (The following Rtport wot nevtt ad<^ted nor toncurrtd in by the Lej/islatvrt.) To THE HONORAOLK TIIK LeOISLATIVB ASSEMBLY. ONTARIO : Th« Select Committee appointed to enquire into the present position of the Huron and Ontario Ship Canal, and also into thu practicability and advantage of the propoMHl work hare the honor to Report — That they have uzamined various witnesses and much documentary evidence, includ- ing mapr, plans, drawings and estimates connected with the project, aubmitte contract. For testimony as to the practicability and advantage of the work, your Committee have had before them th« various reports of former committees presented to fonner Legis- latures with the evidence thereto appended, as well as the oral evidence of its most energetic promoter F. C. Capreol, Esq., and that of R. A. Harrison, FiSq., Q.C., M.P., Ex- Chairman of the Select Committee of the Dominion Parliament of last Session, who veri- fied the documentary evidence then given jind now before your Committee. They hare also had the evidence of Adam Crooks, Esq., Q.C., J. A. Donaldson, Esq., Emigration Agent, Henry Graham, Merchant, and Wm. Sykes, Esq., resident Engineer of the Canal Company, and have examined his scientific and exhaustive report, replete with informa- tion and convincing proofs of the incalculable advantages to the commercial and general interests of the country arising from the construction of the Canal. Your Committee have also read letters from Messieurs John Hawkshaw, of London, England, and A. Rendell, of the same place, who rank among the most eminent Engineers of wie age, expressing their confidence in the practicability of the project, based upon said report. Also letters from Mr. Wythes, a reimledly wealthy and extensive English con- tractor, to the same effect. From the evidence documentary and otherwise, before your Committee, so thoroughly does the project seem to have been canvassed, and so sensible of its practicability and advantages do all parties appear to be, that your Committee deem it unnecessary to con- sume time in adding arguments or opinion to the foregone conclusion that the construc- tion of the canal is quite practicable, and that it would be perhaps the most advantageous vrork which could be undertaken for the Dominion. Your Committee have been most careful in the investigation of the question of means to meet the construction of so vast a work and have no hesitation in reporting that in the event of Mr. Capreol being able to effect the land grant which he seeks, there is strong evidence of his ability to provide the necessary means and skill to accomplish the work. Mr. Capreol produced to your Committee a proposal from reliable capitalists of the United Stutt**, to lutdfrtiikn oiip half thu cnnlrnct, ttoci>|itit))( in payment ont>-half the Coni|iiiiiy'» Stork nny #'2().000,000, jirovidnl n j^rant of I0.(i0(),(i0(» urn-H of land i)c obtained in uiil, au utside people, are ottered for our acce])tttnce, upon terms so easy of fulfil- ment, Your Comndttee can see no valid reason for their rejection. The fact that 840,000,000 are ol)tainable for expenditure amongst us in exchange of 10,000,000 acres of our lands, impn .xse.s Your Committee as one of the most favorable po.ssible overtures. "Were those lands a commodity, which, when paiii lor l)y a foieign people, could be re- moved and leave our country territorially less and poorer, there might then be some slight subject for debate as to their value, and as to whether or not 84,00 per acre were too small a price. Hut when the converse is the fact ; when we not only receive the moneys into the country, l)ut retain our lands, still an undetached portion of our terri- tory ; when the exi)enditurp of those moneys, opens up a vast highway of commerce, and attracts the trade and attention of nations ; when the ownership (d' the lands exchanged, establi.shes an intense intere;,! on the j)art of tlio.se proprietors, in the development and population of our cotuitry, even in the .selfish vit;w of eidiancing their own capital, by the corresponding increase in the value of these lands ; when each thus interested, will naturally wscome a voluntai y agent. ad\ ising emigration to our shoies ; when the thous- ands immigrating, even to perform the necessary labours (»f the undertaking, will be so many added to our population ; when we rctlect tiuit tiie wealth of a nation consists not in its territorial extent alone, but in the <'ulture of its soil, tlu; development of its re- sources, and the numbers of its producers and consumers ; and when we reflect that in the land, in its present state, unpopulateil and unimproved, we have at best but imagi- nary wealth and barren w„sto ; yo'ir Committee cannot divest themselves of the feeling that under the proposed arrangement, there is much to gain and nothing to be lost. That, therelty, in truth, the country would' have still its land ; would have the canal con- structed, and would have the money spent chiefly in our midst, with all' the advantages resulting therefrom. That whilst in the earlier development of our country, it mighC have been pardon- able to smile at the sincerity and ardour evinced by Mr. CapreoT, in the advocacy and orie-hHif the '>* «>> land l)c iki' thf other ;•' rncntjotied, iiiK tu undor- -itli E.-.Klith ill tlie event y direct the Hr. Tupper, lions, during lion ( Jovern- 'inplishmcnt K tu the va«t iviiter powers ling up uod ^♦'ttlement of the opinion ■eated by the to the outer AH they are the waters itages would made of the jiiilrii«Mitii iwinn nropitantl in thi* roi»> p«ny. Thf Ki'titl«'iii»"ri iii KiikI»iirt, uiitl wurw v»rjr much i)lfiM»'(l with Mr. SykfH. Tlit-y thiiilt it wmilil (»• » v <*» ^'i ''^>*' pmiticiMlity "f tlit* «i'|i)>ni(', I «hoiiUI lik« to Mk WitiiPM wliotlit-r ho hiu nnv oihir li-tti>r<4 >iiiiiiliii' to thtwc of Mr. lUwImhftw'a, thtt i« * vttry itnportniit UlH'r)> luiy imlifatioiiH iiimi thi< I'ompiuiy, thi> roiitrActing party itt KtiKlnml, to Mhow whAl kiinl of liiiiri' wnn iio iliMiUhMioii iw to wliMt iliMtnct tht> lumi WM t<> c«im« from. fyitnf.is— It wiu nil th<> north nhort' of l,»ki' Sii|H'rior nml Lake Miimii, tht< IIoIImmI MarnhnM luid th** NottiiwikMk^ii Pittrirt. A/r. /xiM'^/T - Th>*y ilo m t Niipp<>Ni< thiit tli4> ^'riiiit of ti-ii iiiilliotiM of ncru*, that i« alludfil to, iit inttiiidt'd to lii< siirvt'\ii| laiioii tlmt thr ^^niiit ol ten inillioriM of land ia iat«nd»«l to Im* a houiiM to thi< .NtorklioMoiH. Ah fat lus I liuvt) Itfttii able, (fl^iitUaicn, I bnvo nct«ly on my Ktruiglitfurwajiti- neM to carry me through. I nni nrti an unginufir, Itut ineroly a gtMitleninn <>iigiigvd ia ihr prumutiou of thiH work. Mr. J/ounl—h wiw Htatod, hy Mr. ('rook«, that tin- Co .ipony would »'X|M>ct lui luldi tioTuU grant or (iovfiiiiiient gunnuitef of hoiii*> r,niall amount of iuti-ri'Mt on a |)()rtion, My untvfuurth ttf tli<* caitital. l>o yoii know aiiytliiiig of iIuh I Mr. daprfol Xo. There i.s no nieiition of .siieh in the contract ; hut in the cvetit of tho 8t. Lawrence Ciinals being deepened or improved by the tuuiiu company, it wiui men tioned in muw convemationH, that a Ainnll .subsidy or guarantee for a numlHir of yean, might be r»'i|uirHl. Thix, however, lian no (-unnectiun with the canal grunt of land. Mr. Cruokit may have confuundi>d it with the other. Mr. LH,irK. llawkidiaw and Rendell, to turvay tho route of the canal, and if the re[)ort of Mr. S} ko.H waa found tatiafatitory, tlioy would at once proceed with the work, wa« it «o T U'ltwss — AIoHi decidedly. Mr. Lmni~'V\\v.\\ you believe that the capital of |40,UU0,00U would have Iteon raised. Wiine.vi — Certainly, preliminary arrangements were agreed upon, that the whole capital stock ishuuld be taken at a certain rate, and the proceeds invested in the uamea of three trustees, and traiLslorrud tu certain stocks ; that the invnstorH should receive a mioi- mum dividend of 3 per cent, during construction, taking their eliiim of a larger dividend when the canal was conifdeted. Mr. Lmnt — Have you any objections to name the contractors for the wholo capital stock \ WitiifM — It would not be prudent, but I do state, that were I to mention the namoa, there could be no iloubt of the party, even if the capital was 180,000,000, instead of $40,000,000, there being on the r>th January, 1808, a surplus capital in England, of over £56,000 000 Stg. seeking investment. Mr. Lounl — Your company then would require the laud as tho work proceeds, namely, as you spend a million of dollars, you n^^uire a million of acres of land, and so onl lFilness—T\\At is the condition to the extent of 10,000,000 of acres. 1 will further add that the locality ought to be determined unon, and the land vested in trustees in this country. So that there would be three ifiuancial Trustees in Enfjlaud. and three Trustees for the land in Canada. Mr. Lounl — Have you any correspondence? It is stated in your report, that you had interviews with American capitalists. Have you any letters i Witness — Produced letters from the American capitalists, and Mr. Wythes of Eng- land, contractors ; also from Messieurs Hawkshaw and Reudell, engineers, of EagUnd ; — ftUn friim arvtnU (itiHucml Anim of I.oikIoh, K.nt(lMntN>rt ; itlK», Mr. ilArtniun'it ii'|M)rt or |,«<|{iiiliitivii Aw««nil>ly, IH07 ; liUo, Mr Mr«'i>iiki7« rupnrt of LogiaUtive AtMniKly, IN)U (Higfiftl) Frkk. r. Capiiioi.. CiNMniUM Ko<»tii, aiW Ihr., IHOtf. MUHOK AND ONTARKI SHIP ('ANAI.. Thin < '(mimittM tiMa in riMtm l'\ nt !)..Vi A. M. PrDHOtit Mr. Luiint, (('likiminti) ; lion. Mr. (^trnHmn, M«*«NrN. nHv«r, Fi»rgtHir>B, Willi«m», (Ihirhatn); Swiiurtnn, (irnhiinii', (York) ; MoCall, (Norl'olk), mui liAudM. Mr. (Jruokii wm uxniniiwij iim to the |>nM'liciil»ility of tbc work. !{•• naid Mr. Hyktm liatl pn«M)i)t«rt to Mr. ilawkvliAw aiuI Mr. Hiudvll Haid hn diil not m-c how th** |ioo|)i« of Ciuiiida won* no Mind a* not to HCfi it wonhl h« to their ad vantage to ifivo AMNintiinrw to t|i)< ('itinnanv in the Hha))« ot a UnHition tm un cn^inMor. wim oiii> of tho nighent. H« wiu at that tinii) connocttMl with rxt«*nMiv«> railway oprriitionii in Knglund, Hh (Mr. (^rookii), did not iwA Mr. Ilawk*huw poraonally, hut there wun no ipieiitidn an to hit )mun the for«- nioat man in hi* pjoffMNJon at thf proHont day. II)! iiiul h.tcn conniu-tttd with a f^roat many extennivi» worku, mon' particularly nucIi uh nderred to tlii> xnifnce of hydraulicM. He waa apfMtintal to iiup«rinttMid liirgo workn in Holland, and h«> hud l>e« ii !*«>nt to initpect the Suez (!unal, on niont than ono mTanion. Tht* la.«> uiidrrtaken or not, wa>< the pm- jvcted tunnel acronK the ntraitn of Dover, which tomo Kiiricli en)(inecrs had Ixun trying; to work up for Home time. He (Mr. C,) merely mentioned iIiIm to nIiow wh.it a large authoiity Mr. Hawkshnw wan on i\\ientumH connected with en;^ineering. Mr. Ilawknhaw had given hia opinion in favor of the practicahiiity of cniistnictinK the Huron and Onla- rio Ship Canal. Now, with rcHjMM't to the prewont |»osition of thin ncheine, he wouhl nay that every thing had Iw^en nccnmplif*hed, except the huildinf; up of a financial Htnictur*. The fulleat potwihle information had lieen ohtained thni was iiece«w»ry lor any one to be infomed upon with reference to the practicability of the work, and the advantages to be derived from ita conHtrnction, and the nimple qucntioii now. v. an the one of wayn and mfMna. Mr. William Freeland, referring to this qiie.xtion, Hai'l ther«i could l>e little diffi- culty in obtaining the neceft««ry advance* from Knglish cnpitalii-lH. He !<>«i«i tlmn thnt ao lontf m lltn inillinn* of ftcrM w«r« grantril, it dul not iimttrr ti rn|> when' tliry wi ni><'i>i«iiitry for lli« rniiitl to t^ct further awlatuncit than thiit. They woiiM ri'i|utti' Monii* ^oM'itiiiiiDl ^iiiirunici' of ti fiTtAtn otiinll mnount of int<Rt on a itninll |iiitt »f tlic luintiil Day >>ui< toiittli i>|' it 'lliiii w.m ul>out the nxtant of hi* (■otivcrtntinti miiIi the K''iii>*'i>it*ri In* >«|ioki' of. lie wiu not in Kn^lnml itt tlm lima in th«* inli'D'Ht of tli<< nknul, iiml lie i-iirru'il no • iviliMitiaU from tlM< Conipnny. Ilia con VttrtAtionit on thi* titlijiri, ui-ii' niiTcly inriilfritul m* it win>ol mid tlu> <'om|mny hiul nothing to runciml, nml thny courted thn itrictaat iiivcatijjfttion. Mr. lliuriHoii. M. I'., wuMittllcd on. ||i> mu(; thtTM wum ii .S«di'rt Committee appointfld hy thi' lloii.st' of ('iiiiiinoiH at Ottiiwu. last MfuMon, to inv*'Hti^iit*' into tli*t priicticahilitjr and ««x|)fdnin (• of tln' wmk. Tin' < 'ominittic wuh loiiiposfil of ini'inlifrt from all parta of tho Dominion 'I'Idw rrpuiti'd in tiivot of th»> Nrhctntt, and wi>r«> i|iiit<> iiniiniinou* in di'claring their liflit-f in tin- |)romii4(>s made to tin- ('oni|)iitiy Ity canitaliMtM in (iiuiit iSritain and tlui Uniti'd Stall's. Tliiit' war* no att>'iiipt iiiadr to liian tiic Coininittoo l)V undue intlui^ncp, and hr did not ht'lii-vc tln'i<' wcic any of its nit'iiitu-rH who could Im) so influ enc«>d. Thu tnfiiilH'rH from the Lowj'r IVovinci'M, sn-nicd to lako a very warm internil in the scheme, and to ivptrd it aH a ^reat iiatiniial work. Tho Coniuiittee were not ap- pointed to report p'spfctinj; a land ^'laiit, l»iit ihcy ciiiisidiTed that without nuch a grant, the canal could not he con.itnicted. They believed that the wild landw of the country could not be better employed. Tln-y considered that it wouhl be an immense benefit to the whole Dominion, from the introduction of labour and capital, anil the improved means of communication with tin West. Uy the term Western country, was meant not only the Western States nf the mii^hboiirinf; liepuldic, but also the Red River Territory. It was believed that without additional security, the canal could not be constructed. There were othe'ouMi^ts for the produce of the Wesi, but they were not hO short or other- wise so well titled, i.s this piojected canal would be. It wa.s found that the grain wan injured in passinj,' through the Krie Canal. I>y the warm waters in that channel, but this difficulty would l)e obviated in tin- (ieoijiian Hay Canal, for the waters fr»)m Lake Huron would always bo cool. It was i iiisidercd l!:at the deepening of the St. Lawrence Canals, would greatly benefit the Huron .iiid Ontario Can I, and without that, seagoing vessels could not reach Lake Ontario. There was no evidence of mariners taken. His opinion was that a grant of five millions of acres to the Company, with certain checks, could not be better employed. What he meant by checks, was to grant the land as the canal advanced. Mr. (apieol said it was not the intention of the Company to make the de- mand for ten millions of acres without checks. They proposed to receive one million of acres for every million of dollars expended. He me.int by that that the Company would expect to receive one million of acres on the north shore of Lake Superior, as soon as they should have expended a million of doUara, and so on, till the ^10,000,000 were expended. Mr. Harrison said, taking the experience of the United States — and they had been most successful in the construction of their public works — the best way to build the canal, was to grant the laud to the Cumpauy, and allow them to settle it themselvea. r AiTM w«r« II w«nt I tUnrn thtn II umuunt i)f lit tlir nxUlit I At rlin tim* y Ilia flon e «itu»t«e A|)|H)iiiteH pructicabilitjr ntni ull part* inaiiitnuuii in iifut iirituiii to«i hv iiniluf 1 Ih) do in flu m iiitereil in worn not »p- Ruch A grant, tho country isfl benefit to Ik' improved nfl meant not er Territory. constructed, lort or other- iio grnin wan iiiol, but this Lake Huron lence Canals, i?()ing vessels His opinion ks, could not as the canal make the de- ne niilliun of iipany would T, as soon a.s •00,000 were ley had been to build the b themselvM. Tb« Comniitti^ wi*rp iinnnimoiia in »>xflfiMain(( ihia virw Thrre was i>vii?rne« laid b«for« th'mio kht'w ihui It wtiiilil bf A jnooa comrnvrv-inl uivraimrnt Thi' ( oniniiltrn did nut CO into thi* i|uralii>n of jurixlittion, «).* that L ' M not lay whrthrr thi* Itoniinion or Ontario, ahoiild Krniit th«« Ini I Hon Mr ('anu'ron aaketl if th«>r« wa« . < biimpsKtic ii«i*d to n itluonci* th«« Com* mitt«*r in I'avor of the ■rhenie ( Mr. Hurriaoii aaid no chiiiiiptigrKf w\* ua«>d in thf foom. Mr Cnprcol invited lita frirnda to dlink with lillii at otlM'.' timea; Mit he wna the kame ?' all tiniea The I'acili tits for trana|Hirt fntiii the Nnitli Wiat, wnc no iiiore thnii aiilticient to loiet the require- ments of the preaent day, uiid nut one letitli of the North Weat wiw yet aetthd Tho Huron Canal, if conatriicted, wouhl an\e 37(> mileit Wtw^iP Chicago and l^ueber, and would be much ohorter than the Krie route. The Cnniniittee examined H<>n Mr. Kkead, who waa Hot in favor of thi< Mihenn, Imt the lino geiillituaii declared aa hia opiniuD, that the Ottawa route wax impnutmilile ax a xhip i» Canal would viiintintge eiui^^ration, aii of lulMjuiera loiild be ob- tained to buihl the canal. The bulk of the emigranta who ariive here, buloiigetl lu a data which would not be lit to work on farma ; but wmdd be well voilcd for canal labourera, and their prelimiiiaiy training on >tui b a work a/t the pro|Miii'd canal, would tit them to aettle the wild laiuU of the country. He believed the aiiiKiuin enw tit that public works Were about to be ninNttiicted, xuiinilated iniiiiigiation more than the oiler of free grants. Of cnurae, it would be better to tdlVr both iiidiicemeiitH. S<> far ax we know, public (opinion waa atrongly in favour of theHilienu', and be had heard *'iit one expression on the aubject of the ten million grant, that it ahouM be given to the ronipany. [t wouhl be the meana of developiuK laiida w hiih are now U'veleaa, ami would bring a Urge amount of capital and UNeful labour lo the country. Mr. FurgUNon Huggefttod thai i|Ui'stionh of Huch importance shonid be -.ubmitted and answered in writing, The Chairman and Mr. Lauib-r aiiio concurred. The auggeatiou \«ai adoptid, and the Committee adjourned at lO.bi A M.. till half past nine o'clock tomorrow morning. When Mr. Sykcs will be examim d. I'KOCEKniNfiS IN Co.MMITTKK. Tlie Select Committee *nppoiiiteiniiiitTcc tli.tt. wImii in lioudon, Mr. Eastman, a merchant, had iiifurmed biiu ilial tli<' inouey wa.- n aily tor ihiri tanal. They only wanted a grant of land. As a merchant of this City, Mr, (Jiabam wa*, sure the canal would do a {ileal deal of ;,'0(hI, and ibat the t'celin.a was generally in favor of the work. Mr. Kastman, of LoikIom. was a ui.in of lar;."' wealtb and couucctiuim. He assured him (Mr. (iraham) that the nmney wa.s Ivini.' idl'' in the \aults. and that they w;ere only waiting for a grant to go on at once with the \vork,-<. Tin y did riot enter into a diHciiHsion as to the amount of money that was in the vault.-*. .Mr. Kantinan was extensively engaged in business, but he ha.s n<'>w retired, lb' i> a partner in the house of Uothchild. Mr. Eastman was satisfied it would be a good .■e and Asia, leighbouring ith that Ke- mineral and migrants and s, and what e amounts of I of Chicago, a Ste. Marie, Iff. What in the date to which you have brought this estimate t Antu'tr — The year 1866 in most instances, in some only to the your 1866, in tumb«r and staves through Buffalo only to the year 1862. 16. What was the population and proportionate area of land undor cultivation for the districts which you took into account t AntKer—'l\\e area of land which I estimate as tributary to this canal in the United Statt amonntH to 614,548 square miles, say 394,310,720 acres. The population of which area in IHOO amounted to 4,132,827, and tlio amount of land under cultivation attl at time was 24,983,680 acres, being less than seven ])er cent, jf the total area. In addition to this vast extent of country, there is our own North-West Territery, which is estimfw .. at a much krger extent of valuable mineral and agricultural lands. 17. Have you estimated the comparative costs of fi-eight between this route ond others now in existence t Answer — I have. 18. What do you consider will be the advantage derived from the construction of this canal 1 Answer — A reduction of 50 per cent, in freight, and a saving of time in the trans- port of freight to nearly the same extent. 19. In estimating the cost of constructing this work, on what data have you pro- ceeded ) Answer—By first preparing plans and specifications of what works I conceived would be adequate for the reiiuiremonts of this canal, then carefully calculating the quantitie* of the same, aud bringing out the results at what I believed to be goo