IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I Ui 128 1 2.5 •CM) 1^ 1^ 12.2 m 1.25 III 1.4 1.6 < 6" ► vl /a / ^^^*' ly / '/ Hiotographic Sciences Corporation 33 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. MSSO (716) 872-4503 ^>^ CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICIVIH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Inttituta for Historical IVIicroroproductions Inatitut Canadian da microraproductiona liistoriquas 1980 Technical and Bibliographic Notas/Notas tachniquas at bibliographiquas Tha Instituta has attamptad to obtain tha bast original copy availabia for filming. Faaturas of this copy which may Isa bibliographically uniqua, which may altar any of tha imagas in tha raproduction. or which may significantly changa tha ustif^i mathod of filming, ara chackad balow. D D D D D □ Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur I I Covers damaged/ Couverture endommagia Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaur6e et/ou peiliculAe I I Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque I ] Coloured maps/ Cartes gdographiques en coule'jr Coloured ink (I.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couEeur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ Reii6 avec d'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La reliure serr^e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion le long de la marge intdrieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdas iors d'une restauration apparaissant dans le taxte, mais, lorsque ceia itait possible, ces pages n'ont pas 6t6 film^es. Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl^mantairas: L'Institut a microfilm* la mailleur exemplaire qu'il lui a At* possible de se procurer. Les details da cat exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la m^thoda normale de filmage sont indiqute ci-dessous. Th( to I I Coloured pages/ D Pages de couleur Pages damaged/ Pages endommagAes □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages rastaurias et/ou pellicul6es □ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages dicolortos, tachetAes ou piquies n Pages detached/ Pages d6tach6es □ Showthrough/ Transparence □ Quality of print varies/ Quality in^gale de I'impression □ Includes supplementary material/ Comprend du materiel supplimentaire Th po of fllr Ori bei th( sic oti fin sic or I I Only edition available/ Seule Mition disponibie Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure. etc., ont M filmtes A nouveau de fa^on A obtanir la meiileure image possible. Th shi Til wr Ml dif en be rig re< m( This item is filmed at tha reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est film* au taux de rMuction indiquA ci-dessous. 10X 14X 18X 22X 26X 30X y 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X The copy filmed here has been reprodured thanks to the generosity of: National Library of Canada L'exemplaire film* fut reproduit grAce A la gtnirositA d«: BibliothAque nationalis du Canada The images appearing here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in keeping with the filming contract specifications. Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed beginnii.g with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impression. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol — *> (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Waps, -iiai-s, charts, etc., may be filmed at diffk.-. t recfuction ratios. Those too large to be entirely incluci!id in one exposure are filmed beginning in thb upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: Les images Stiivantes ont At4 reproduites avec le plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition at de la nettetti de l'exemplaire film6, et en conformity avec les conditions du contrat de filmage. Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en papier est imprimAe sont fiimAs en commen^ant par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la dernlAre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires originaux sont filmAs en commen^ant par la premiere page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par la derniire page qui comporte une telle empreinte. Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la derniire image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbole — *• signifie "A SUIVRE ". le symbols V signifie "FIN ". Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre filmis A des taux de reduction diffirents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre reproduit en un seul cliche, ii est film6 A partir de Tangle sup^rieur gauche, de gauche A droite, et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images n^cessaire. Les diagrammes suivants illustrent la m^thode. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 *> A CHARGE, UKMVEBED UT THE RIGHT REy. /. IRAIERS LEWIS, D.D.y L.L.I)., LORD BISHOP OF ONTARIO, AT THE VISITATION OF THF, CI.EKC.V OF THR PlOCESE OF i:NTARIO. HELD LV THE lilSIlUF.S CHAPEL, IX THE CITY Of 01 T J WA, OCTOliEli .i.l, 167.:. PUBLISHED AT THE KEl^EST OF THE CLERGY. OTTAWA: rHiNTEi) ;.v L J5. 'J'avi.uu, !.".», ul il 33 KiDi At: Stkkkt A CHARGE, / duitibid bt thb RIGHT REV. J. TRAFERS LEfVIS, D.D., L.A./)., LORD BISHOP OF ONTARIO, AT TRB VISITATION Of THI OLBBOT OF THB locESE OF Ontario. HELD IN- THE BISHOPS CHAPEL, ly THE CITY OF OTTAWA, OCTOBER 22, 1872. PUBLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF THE CLERGY. OTTAWA: Printbd bt L B. Tailor, 29, 31 & 33 Kidbau Stbbxt A CHARGE. Rev'd and dear Brethren, You will remember that two years ago a large number of you presented me with a Memorial, asking me to hold a Visi- tation or Visitations of the Clergy of the Diocese. Hitherto I was unable to accede to your wishes, but I am glad that the time has come when 1 can meet you for counsel and brotherly intercourse in things Spiritual. The delay in requesting your attendance at a Visitation, was not caused by any reluctance on my part to revive such meetings, nor from any distrust of their utility ; on the contrary, time has made it clear to me, that the Diocesan Synod needed to be supplemented by Visitations. The Synod is a legal Incorporation whose powers are definitely limited, and touch almost wholly the temporalities of the Church. The atmosphere of such a body is secular ; business of Finance, Estate, Discipline and Church extension occupy the time, and our Lay Bretliren, whose presence is so necessary, are naturally anxious that the proceedings shall be as brief as is consistent with safety. The result is, that our Sessions are so hurried, that it is impossible to keep a majority of members in attendance for more than two days. We, have no time to meet for Prayer, and the discussion of such subjects as will be presented to us at this Visitation, and therefore I determined to make trial how far our meeting together for Communion and Prayer, and the interchange of opinions touch- ing the Spiritualities of the Diocese, may with God's blessing conduce to the edification of the Church ; and I feel much strengthened in my determination, by the belief that you share my views. I would add that I should not have summoned you together were it not for the request which was wholly spontaneous on your part, because I should have been very reluctant to impose on the Clergy the additional expense of travelling a second time in the same year. It will assuredly be useful to take a review of the Church work of the ten years that have passed since the Diocese was organized. It ought to fill us with gratitude and courage. Our labours for Chrifct and His Church have met often- times with opposition, yet we have to record steady progress. I have had my own share of anxiety and misiepresentation, but I hope that I am the better for it all. Our thanks arc then due in an especial manner to Almighty God our Heavenly Father for the success He has vouchsafed us, and our gratitude, if it deserves the name, should nerve us for the toils still before us. The Diocese of Ontario was at its formation far the feeblest of the three into which the old Diocese of Toronto was divided. Even now it cannot compare with the others in population or wealth, and lam not therefore surprised that many things which have since been accomplished, were at first entertained coldly, by reason of our supposed inability to effect them. But we have had a happy illustration of the strength of Unity. I trace, under God, any advancement of Church principles, or extension of Chuieh wo)k which we behold, to that union of sentiment in all matters of moment, which has characterized the Clergy of this 'Dioo'^<'z. The retrospect of the past ten years enables me to lay before you a few facts which are so encouraging as to stimulate us anew " to love and to good works." In the cause of domestic missions (a cause which has always been first in my thoughts and prayera) our means have grown from nothing to an income this j'^ear of $8,000. The Sustentation Fund which I began eight years ago, as a means of providing against any curtailment of Missionary work when the small grant made by the S. P. G. should cease, has reached the satisfactory sum of $26,048.15 of Invested Capital, besides unpaid subscriptions. Our Widows' and Orphans' Fund, and the Fund for assisting students in Divinity, though not yet as large as we desire, have hitherto sufficed to meet the demands upon them, so that no financial difficulty has arisen. The Commutation Fund, which has been a source of great anxiety to me, has at length been placed on a sure and solid basis, and no one rejoices more than myself that our younger Brethren have now a reasonable prospect of reaping advantage from that Fund, which amounts to $276,000 of Invested Capital. ide and ct often- ress. I 1, but I 1 due in r for the rves the Diocese iree into now it and I am nee been n of our a happy 3lod, any t ch work natters of lay before e us anew lissions (a i prayers) is year of tars ago, as nary work cease, has }d Capital, ans' Fund, ^h not yet e demands sen. The mxiety to md no one have now and, which The Rectory lands question is in process of successful solution, and the improved incomes of the Rectors, which the sales as yet made have effected, is a source of great gratification. The Invested Capital of lands already sold is $76,276.17. The number of the Clergy has increased from fifty-four in 18C2 to eighty in 1872. In the same period fifty -two *new Churches, of which twenty-one have been consecrated, and twenty-three new Parsonage houses have been built, and ten Cemetries conse- crated. I have ordained thirty-five Priests and thirty-two Dea- cons, and admitted from other Dioceses forty-three Clergy. I have confiimed 9,287 persons, of whom 7,463 became Communicants on the occasion of their Confiimation, and i must allude to a remar- kable feature in these Confirmations, that 2,000 of those confirmed were adults, and about 1,500 were converts from various religious denominations. And I must take this opportunity of bearing my testimony to the marked improvement which has with few exceptions taken place in the mode of conducting Divine service, in the increased reverence of our congregations, in the heartiness of the singing, and in the general attention paid to the arrangements for public worship ; the increased zeal and accuracy with which candidates have been prepared for Confirmation, and the now almost uniform custom to partake of the Holy Communion at the time of their Confirmation,prove that you, my Brethren, have not been unfaithful in your arduous duties. But I turn from the affairs of our own Diocese to those of the Church at large. We shall have opportunities for considering the best means of promoting the spiritual welfare of those committed to our charge, during the remainder of the week. Let me occupy your attention this evening while I take a survey of some of those movements in the Church which have attracted universal atten- tion, and concerning which I have often been asked for an opinion by the Clergy of the Diocese. It has been our lot to live in a period of intense activity in * This enumeration does not include old Churches which have been superseded bv larger and more expensive ones, such as the Churches at Cornwall, Prescott, Perth Ottowa, &o., nor old Parsonagea which have been rebuilt on a larger scale. religious matters. It needed no great foresight to see that such a time must eventually come as a reaction from the unbelieving indifference of the preceding age. Now it is the natural tendency of reactions to go too far in an opposite direction. This law holds good in all movements of the human mind. A reaction against political tyranny or abuse, propels reform into revolution or Communism. The reaction against Papal tyranny and abusos hurried the Continental Reformers into the enormities of the Ana-Baptists, and culminated in England in the triumph of political Puritanism. We should not therefore be surprised that many sagacious persons dreaded the force of the reaction from irreverence and pernicious disregard of decency in public worship. Hence the excitement and bad feeling which have existod side by side with the attempts made to Re-form the mode of performing public worship, to form it back again as it once was, on its old basis. Now it is almost impossible at such a time to avoid being drawn away into partizanship. It needs the calmness of a well balanced mind to decline association with either obstructive fanatics or " Ritualistic acrobats." To intensify the difficulty, there is the prevailing sin of Individualism, or the unrestricted exercise of unfettered private judgment. The mar. who acts on the belief that what he gathers from Scripture by the exercise of his judgment (such as it is), must be the true meaning, irrespective altogether of the authority of the Church, and the man "who, through his private judgment, willingly and pur- posely doth break the tradition and ceremonies of the Church," are pupils of the same school. The English Reformation was not justified by its promoters on the plea that they were led to the changes then made by their private judgment. On the contrary, it was a principle of that Reformation, that the Church of England did not mean to deviate from the Romish Church any farther than the Roman had deviated from the Primi- tive Church. Another principle was, that Scripture was not to be interpreted so as ti be at variance with the meaning attached to it by the Primitive Doctors and the undisputed general Councils. It appears to me that these principles have been ignored \^ lat such a ibelieving I tendency law holds 3n against olution or nd abuses ies of the riumph of rised that stion from LC worship. ■jy\ side by performing on its old ivoid being }3 of a well abstractive difficulty, inrestricted who acts he exercise 3 meaning, 3h, and the • and pur- le Church," nation was jr wore led at. On the the Church ish Church the Primi- re was not le meaning ited general )een ignored in the acnmonious discussion of several prominent points of Ritual. Granting that such practises as Incense at Holy Communion, and lights dui-ing the Celebration, and vestments for the Celebrant, are symbolically instructive, which maybe doubted, or legal, which they aie declared not to be, yet pnrely, it should reconcile us to theii- loss, to remember that the Primitive Church did not employ them as accessories of the Eucharist. Nay further, not one of the most ardent advocates of them regards them as absolutely essential, since what is termed Low Celebration is equally valid for all purposes of grace as High Celebration. All that I can learn to be urged in favor of these accompaniments of the Eucharist, amounts to this, that they elevate men's minds, and are impressive by reason of their symbolism. But while I admit that we cannot have too much reverence and Godly fear in the Celebration of Holy Communion, I think it possible to have a gi'eat deal too much symbolism. And the evil becomes greater when we find that the symbolism to which so much importance is attached is altogether false. They who hold theverystrongestopinionsregardingthe sacrificial nature of the Eucharist, cannot satisfactorily explain the use of Incense. There is not a particle of evidence that it was ever used in the Primitive Church, and the only thing symbolized by it, is the ascent of Prayer to the Throne of Grace. The restriction of its use to the Eucharist is therefore a clear misuse of symbolism ; and the same may be said of the use of Lights on the Altar, which may have a significance if lighted during the reading of the Gospel to symbolize that Christ is the light of the World ; but which have really no force or effect whatever as pertaining to a sacrificial rite. Again, it may be an open question whether it be desirable that the Celebrant should wear a special vestment, and since the Cope has been declared by the Judicial Committee to be the legal vestment for the Bishops when Celebrating on certain High Festivals, it may be thought becoming that the Chansable should be assigned to Priests, still, in as much as we know from the best ArchsBologists that there is no trace decemible of such a vestment in use in the Primitive Church, we should be contented with the Surplice which is the nearer^t approach to the vestment worn by the officiating Priest in Primitive times. ( i ! ! I am aware that an appeal to the discipline of the Primitive Church is distasteful in some quarters. We hear of the objection that Christ has promised to be with His Church in every age, and that therefore the Primitive Church has no claim to special authority, and that " the Cliurch hath power to decree rites and ceremonies " and " that they may be changed according to the diversities of times, countries, and men's manners." This may be all true, and yet the conviction may remain, that the appeal to Primitive antiquity is the best safe-guard against the errors of the nine- teenth century ; as it most assuredly proved itself against the errors of the sixteenth century. As a Church we should have been more blessed, if the time and energies expended upon such points of Ritual as we have been considering, had been directed to a restoration of the Godly discipline which our Commination Service tells us existed in the Primitive Church, when " they who were convicted of notorious sin were put to open penance that their souls might be saved in the day of the Lord." In consequence of the late decision of the Judicial Committee in the case of " Hibbert v. Purchas," I havo been requested by some of the Clergy to give instructions regarding the position of the Priest while consecrating the elements. My own practice for over twenty years was to read the Prayer of Consecration at the north end of the Holy Table. But when the learned Judge of the Court of Arches, Sir Robert Phillimore, giving judgment in the case of " Hibbert v. Purchas," declared that this question had been settled by the Privy Council in the case of " Martin and Machonochie," since their Lordships had ruled that the words " standing before the Table " apply to the whole sentence, I considered myself bound to conform to the Law as interpreted by the highest Ecclesiastical Court, and I consec- rated standing before the Table. The case was however carried on appeal to the Privy Council, who declared that Sir Robert PhiUimore had mis-interpreted their language. They said that the question of the position of the Celebrant had not been before the Court at all. That the point they had before them was posture or attitude, that is, whether the Consecration Prayer should be read while the Priest was standing, or whether kneeling was 5 Primitive le objection Biy age, and al authority, ceremonies " iversities of ,11 true, and 3 Primitive Df the nine- against the should have 1 upon such leen directed iUommination n " they who )enance that 1 Committee requested by e position of id the Prayer . But when rt Phillimore, las," declared ouncil in the iordships had apply to the cm to the Law md I consec- wever carried it Sir Robert ley said that )t been before m was posture er should be kneeling was allowable during any part of the Prayer. Or in other words, that they meant that the word btaading applied to the whole sentence, but that the words " before the Table," did not. It is a pity that their Lordships did not say plainly what thny meant, for indeed it is no reproach to Sir R. Phillimore's sagacity that he did not interpret aright their Lordships' language. The Law is, however, now explicit enough, and the legal position of the Celebrant is standing at the north end. To this Law I have myself conformed. My reasons are these : I cannot by any possibility make the subject a matter of conscience. My belief concerning the Eucharist is entirely unafFtcted by the position of the Celebrant. My views touching the nature and effect of Holy Communion were quite as decided during the many years in which I consecrated at the North end, as during the few years that I consecrated "Standing before the table." Moreover, were the position of the Celebrant left to my private judgment, which God forbid, I should stand bthind and not before the Holy Table, with my face to the people. That was, I believe, the position in the Primitive Church, and it enabled the people to see more fully one of thb most beautifully symbolical acts in the whole service, the fracture of the Bread, an act of so much significance, that in the Primitive Church the Holy Sacrament took its name from it, and was called " The breaking of Bread." Again, in matters of Ritual, there must be some limit, und I know of no other limit than Laiu, aod 1 cannot forget that when 1 was promoted to the Priesthood, I promised " to minister the Sacraments as this Church and Realm hath received the same." I am well aware that the considerations I have urged will not aT)p?ar equally forcible to all minds, while there are some curious features in the decision of the Privy Council and in its results, which must not be overlooked. In the first place, the judgment was rendered in an undefended suit. The Lord Chancellor said that " the Committee had not tlie assistance of the argument ot Counsel on behalf of the Defendant," and the fact that he attached much weight to this consideration, appears from his remarks in the recent Bennett case. His Lordship said that " The Court has 10 iti not had that assistance from the argument of Counsel in his behalf, which is especially desirable in cases like the present, where the Committee are called upon to advise Her Majesty on matters of grave importance, as a tribunal of ultimate appeal." It is there- fore just possible that the judgment in the Purchas case may be reversed on the next hearing of a similar one, should the Respon- dent employ Counsel, and different members ot the Judicial Committee be selected to form the tribunal. Whatever be the cause, there seems to be no disposition on the part of the Bishops, or even aggrieved Parishioners, to put the Law in force. It is ignored by many of the Clergy, and the Bishop of London declined to gratify two of the Canons of St. Paul's Cathedral, who declared their intention of ignoring the judg- ment, and requested a prosecution. These considerations may have served to make many hesitate before changing their position at the Holy Table, but I confess that they have little weight with me. There is, however, one point on whic.i I think we are all agreed, that the Constitution of the Tribunal ot ultimate appeal in Ecclesiastical cases, is thoroughly unsatisfactory. The amendment of the Act of Uniformity will, I am confident, prove a blessing to the Church. What we have so long needed is not change or revision ol the prayer book, hut flexibility in the nse^ot it, and I earnestly hope that the PrDvincial Synod may at its next session adopt the provisions of the amended act : — First — In legalizing the shortened order formorningand evening prayer to be used on any day except Sunday, Christmas Day, Ash Wednesday, Good Friday and Ascension Day, in lieu of the present order for Morning and Evening Service. Tho effect of this will be, I trust, the introduction of Daily Prayer in our Churches wherever it be possible. Secondly — In giving permission on any special occasion to be approved by the Ordinary, to use a special form of Service, also to bs approved by the Ordinary, so that there be not introduced into such service anything except hymns, which does not torm part of the Bible or Prayer Book. The effect of this will, I anticipate, be the adoption of more I 11 on of more efficacious and suitable Services for Mi&sion Stations, or for special Missionary operations. Thirdly — In permitting a third or additional form of Service for Sunday, under necessary restrictions. This will prove a great boon to our Missionaries who at present have often to repeat even- song, when serving at three stations on Sunday. It is also \irorth remarking that what many of us have been so long contending for, has been decided by the amended act, namely that the Order for Morning Prayer, the Litany and the Order for Holy Com- munion are separate Services and may be used as such. I take this opportunity of stating that I shall be glad to author- ize the use of the shortened Service for Morning and Evening Prayer, except on Sundays, and the Holidays already mentioned ; and should I be requested by any of the Clergy to authorize the use of a third or additional Service on Sundays, I shall give my sanction to that form, which has received the approval of the Bishops of London, Winchester and Rochester. Coincidently with this wise flexibility in the manner of using the Book of Common Prayer, there has arisen an agitation for the revision of the Book itself. In the Irish Church the proposed revision, happily not yet consummated, amounts to revolution. In England, the Creed, commonly called that of St. Athanasius, has been selected as the point of attack. Seven thousand persons have petitioned the Primates of the English Church that some relief should be given to the consciences of those who dislike or dis- believe that Creed. I read the reply of the Archbishops with amaze- ment. It amounts to this: that their Lordships promise to do what they canto find a solution of the difficulty, and the reason assigned for their promised exertions is that the damnatory clauses give great offence to many faithful members of the Church. They " anticipate that they shall be able to devise some plan which shall meet the wishes of that large body of persons who object to the solemn use of words which they regard as unauthorized in their most obvious sense either hi/ the letter or the spirit of the Holy Scriptures." There are, therefoie, two classes of people holding opposite opinions regarding this Creed ; the petitioners, 'ti ; i 12 amounting to 7000 Laymen, who believe that the language of the Creed in its most obvious sense to be unauthorized either by the letter or the spirit of Scripture ; and on the other side, the whole body of the Olergy of the Church of England, the Archbishopa included, who, at their Ordination solemnly accepted that Creed, and subscribed to the 8th article of religion, which says that the Creed "ought thoroughly to be received and believed, /or it may be proved by most certain warrants of Holy Scripture" or aa the Latin text has it, " Nam firmissimis Scripturarum Testimoniis probari possunt." It is to reconcile these opinions which are as widely separated as light and darkness, that the Archbishops have set themselves. " Pergunt pugnantia secum Frontibus adversis componere." But granting that relief could be given to the con- sciences of the Petitioners in some milder method than the exercise of a high-handed parliamentary interference, and the necessary- result — disruption, I would ask what is to be gained if the stumbling block which has been removed out of the path of 7,000 or 70,000 be rolled across the path of millions ? Multitudes, if this Confession of Faith be silenced, will ask the reason, why ? Is it because it is untrue ? No ; but because it gives offence. But the Cross of Christ was not only an offence but foolishness, and yet St. Paul gloried in it. There must be not only offences but heresies, that they that are approved may be made manifest amongst us, and I take it as nothing but certain fact, that more than 7,000 persons can be found in England to see an offence in any given dogma of the Catholic Church. The Petitioners may have more than ordinary intelligence in theological matters, of which, however, we have no proof, butif they have, then I suppose they take the damnatory or minatory clauses of the Creed in the same sense and with the same limitations as they take the damnatory sentences of the Holy Scripture. If Scripture gives them no offence, neither need the Creed in its condemnations. P"*^ T suspect that the damnatory clauses have very little to do ' . the great offence taken. What is at stake is dogmatic theology of any kind. It is the right belief in the Incarnation yrhich the Creed embodies, and the terms ** Person" and " Begotten" 13 and " Substance," and " Taking the manhood into God*' ,7hich are in reality the rock of offence. This is the rock on which so many heresies have been dashed to pieces, and it seems therefore desirable to remove it out of the way or relegate it to some dark spot. But how long could the Nicene survive this treatment of the Athanasian Creed ? The three Creeds must stand or fall together, for they may be one and all proved by most certain warrants of Holy Writ. The Athanasian Creed is the only one which tells us what God is. It is the noblest song to the God made known by Christianity the Church possesses, and as it has braved the battle and the tempest of heresy for 1000 years, we should contend for the faith enshrined in its words and hand it down to our children's children. A revision of the text, so as to bring it into greater harmony with the original Latin, seems necessary, and will doubtless be effected ; but it seems to me that what is still more essential is a change in the mode of repeating it. The alternate reading of the verses by Minister and people is unnatural in a Creed, and has, I believe, no other authority than that of usage. Better far would be the repeating of it as the Nicene Creed is repeated by the people after the Minister, or, better still, the chanting of it by the Choir and Congregation. Not a little of the opposition to this creed would have been avoided were it sung as a Hymn rather than read as a Creed ; indeed the intention of the Church is plain, for tho Creed is pointed for the express purpose of its being sung. But it remains for me to take notice of the charge levelled at this Creed — its want of charity. This we can by no means admit, if, as was before observed, the threats and denunciations of the Creed be taken with the same qualifications and limitations as the damnatory passages of Holy Scripture. The Creed deals out monitions and denunciations against Arianism and AppoUin- arianism, but as has been well said,* we do not on that account express any opinion on the final destiny Arius and AppoUinarius. It is against Arianism and Appollinarianism as such that we direct our words. The Law under which we are saved is laid down in • r»de Letter to Rt. Hon. W. E. Gladstone, by Eev. Mr. MacColl. n u ^ 14 the Creed, but the application of the Law to individuals is known only to Omniscience. St. Paul lays it down as an axiom of the Christian Religion that " no whoremonger nor covetous man who is an idolater hath any inheritance in the Kingdom of Christ and of God." Yet who would think of applying this axiom to any given idolater unless he knew (which is impossible), all the extenuating circumstances of each case. It is here that true charity comes in. It is a grace whose counterfeit is false liber- ality. Liberality is the fashion of the age we are living in ; it is a passing phase of public opinion in religion and politics. They who are most Conservative in religious matters love to be thought Liberal Conservatives. And it would all be well if this liberality were extended with fairness and uniformity to the supporters as well as to the despisers of the Creed. But alas ! this liberality ex- pands itself in trying to prove that all the want of Charity "which beareth all things, believeth all things and hopeth all things," is to be laid to the charge of them who believe this Creed to contain a true revelation of the nature of God. This vaunted liberalism will be proved on examination to be exhibited only towards those who run in its own groove and direction. The attention of the whole Anglican Church has been lately drawn to what is known as the Westminster Scandal, when the Dean of Westminster invited a denier of the Godhead of Christ to Holy Communion in the Abbey, with the other members of the Committee of Revision. This was an instance of the liberality I speak of But a few years ago there was another Westminster Scandal, when the same Dean who extended a cordial invitation to an Unitarian, refused the request of seventy-six Bishops who wished, before separating, it might be for ever, to receive together the Holy Communion in the same Abbey. Who' does not see that liberality in such an one is simply guided by his likings or dislikings. He liked the idea of a Revision of the Scriptures, though an Unitarian was the Reviser, and he disliked the L>».mbeth Conference. He had no other way of showing this liking for the one and disliking for the ot^.ir in any overt act but by spurious liberality to the Reviser, and genuine illiberality to the Conference. I should scarcely have felt justi- 15 uals is known I axiom of the bous man who of Christ and axiom to any isible), all the lere that true is false liber- iving in ; it is politics. They to be thought this liberality supporters as 8 liberality ex- harity "which all things," is eed to contain ited liberalism only towards de attention of what is known • Westminster Communion in bee of Revision. Jut a few years the same Dean m, refused the separating, it lion in the same n one is simply a of a Revision eviser, and he other way of le oth .^.r in any ', and genuine bave felt justi- fied in taking my illustration from a living Ecclesiastic, were it not that in the debates in Convocation the champion in the assault on the Athanasian Creed was the same Dean of West- minster. Religionists of our day besides wishing to be thought liberal, wish to be thought practical as well. The Athanasian Creed is, they say, too metaphysical and, therefore, unpractical. But although the technicalities and definitions of the Creed are not now the theme of the bitter controversies that raged in former times, yet surely we may expect that in the cycle of events they will again be subjects of discussion. And if this Creed be ex- punged or mutilated we, or our children, shall be deprived of the armour that once proved so powerful. It will be too late to fall back upon this Creed when it has lost its place in the Prayer Book. The value of the Creed now may seem small because it is said to be unpractical. But it was very practical once and may, and will be so again, as old heresies recur, and any one can see with how much greater force it can be appealed to as an honored document holding its present place in our Liturgy, than if it be referred to a^ a symbol which the Anglican Church deliberately expunged or retained simply as an interesting historical relic. If the rubric ordering Daily Prayer and the Offertory and public Baptism had been tampered with when these things were disused because considered unpractical, it would have been much more difficult than it has been to revive them when they came to be thought practical. For these reasons let not any inaction on our part aid in robbing us of that glorious symbol of the Faith which is our heritage, and not ours only, but that of the Catholic Church. It has come to my knowledge that some of the Clergy have refrained from using the new Lectionary until I had called upon them to do so. It is true that I did not make known my wishes on the subject, because I thought it unnecessary, the Provincial Synod having by resoluion adopted the new Table of Lessons. I Permit me now, however, to request that the new Lectionary ' be used in all the Churches of this Diocese. We are of course 16 /M all bound by the action of the Provincial Synod, but nevertheless, it will be of use to dwell for a short time on the advantages ';* expected from the change. In the first place, we are at last re- lieved from the insensate practice of reading Chapters simply because they are Chapters, and as if the Bible had been Chaptered with any tolerable regard to the sense. Cardinal Hugo is said to have been the first publisher of the whole Scriptures in Chapters, and Robert Stephens the arbitrary inventor of our present verses, A. D. 1550. This arbitrary distribution of the Sacred text was adopted for the purpose of facilitating reference Irom concordances I which Hugo and Stephens were then engaged in perfecting, but without the smallest intention of assisting the reader to understand the sense. It is as absurd to suppose the chaptering and versification of the Scriptures to be an aid to the hearer or reader, as it would be to imagine that the division of the Country into Concessions and Lots was made to facilitate travelling and not for convenience of ownership and description. In the public reading of God's word we are now free from this tyranny which often compelled us to read at the end of a Chapter, a genealogy or episode which had nothing to do with the main narrative, and which was thrown into the Chapter because no other place could be found for it. There are many other advantages in the new Lectionary. The old was drawn up on the supposition that the Congregations attended the Daily Service, but in as much as they do not, systematic instruction was lost. The new is drawn up chiefly with a view to the edification of those who do not go to Church ftx'ce^ t oil Sunday. Again it is a great gain that the Gospels are now read during a portion of the year in the Evening, and the Epistles in the Morning. A large proportion of those who attend Churchin the Evening only, especially in towns and cities are much more likely to be edihed by lessons derived from the life and teach- ing of our Lord, than by having their religous instruction confined to the abstruse theology of the Epistles. Many books of the Old Testament are now for the first time read for Sunday Lessons, such as five of the minor Prophets, and Job, Ecclesiastes and the Revela- 17 at nevertheless, the advantages arc at last re- simply because )een Chaptered Hugo is said to res in Chapters, [• present verses, acred text was )m concordances perfecting, but er to understand chaptering and learer or reader, he Country into filing and not for le public reading ny which often a genealogy or I narrative, and other place could icctionary. The B Congregations as they do not, Irawn up chiefly Dt go to Church b the Gospels are vening, and the ;hose who attend i cities are much le life and teach- 1 iruction confined books of the Old lay Lessons, such i and the Bevela- tion of St. John. "•The new Table is more comprehensive, more historical more biogrophical, more doctrinal, more Messianic and Evangelical." What 'is also very important, we have the intro- ductij'i of a great number of passages referred to in the New Testament, often quoted in sermons, and familiar to the readers of devotional books, but seldom heard in their original context in the Old Testament, as for example "Comfort yo, Comfort ye, my People," which will now be heard in full and with its proper surroundings. Now, for the first time, will be read on Sundays the opening vision of the Apocalypse, Alpha and Omega, the Seven Cliurches and " the song of the Lamb." Another gain is the the provision made for three Sunday Services, giving a choice of Lessons and the j>awer of varying them from year to year where there is but ono afternoon Ser- vice. But I think that I have said enough to show some of the improvements manifest in the New Lectionary, an