AN OPEN LETTER TO A Roman Catholic Friend ul'ranshitcb from the cVrman of CV bom ILitb, I'KdKKSSOU IN lllli Umv|:|CMTV u^ II' INN. BY THOMAS MACFARLANE. I'unLisiiKn ON 'rm: occasion of thk FoyRTii Centenhial of the bii]th of Martin Ll'thei|. • ■**». I * t I I » • * MOXTRK\L: MririiKii. iv Wii.soN, Pkimi'.ks 34^ Xorki', Damk Strek'I'. 1883. P284.07 H 18 7/>n • * • • • * « • TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE. l'"Mur Iiuiuli'cil \-car-> ;il;') M.\l;ri\ l.i I'liliK was hmu, aiul, tliirty--^r . l!1 yi'ars aflcrwards, in !iis ailclrc^s ti> the (IciMnan l'".inpL'!'()i" ami niihility. !h' set tni-th the bi-sl practical anti'lotc wc pfisscvs to tlu; iiia_L;niliccnt fallac)- which fxalt-- tlic r)i>h.<»p {>[ IvMinc as absolute' spiritual ruler and temporal delhrnner o\ei" all C'hrisle-ndi ini. " 'I'he secular power \> ol" (iod, to " ])uni''h the wicked and ])rotect tlie i^ood, and so has rule " over tho whole boily of Christian^." Tlu^e arc LiTiniK's w'oi-ds f.iuud.ed Upon \-. elld;ni iwn texts in Holy Scripture; yet in our own d.ay. koine has. more definitely and per.-^istentb than e\ei-, rorniulated its claim.-^. On ihi-, the tour hundretlth aniu'\ersa:-\- of LrT!ii:ix'."s birth, and at a time whien the autlu)r- itics of the Roman Catholic C'lun-jh seem <;u:te unrestrained in condenmin;.;" tiiose who tlo not bow to its tiecrees, it seems not ino]);)ortune to allow a \'oice to be h.eard in defence of our common I*rote.>tanlisn\. These words of Pi'ofessor \(iM Rath, one of the foretnost scientific men in luu'ope, are of \-alue, not only because the)- ex[)ose the fundamental errors of Roman Catholicism, but also for the testimony they bear aL;ainst the materialistic tendencii's (^f thi.' pi-esent a;_;e. 'I"hr transl.ator hopes th.at they may be of service in pointin;.^ out the riL;ht middK; ]).itli between sacerdotalisi'n and a^L^nosticism, and cnablinjj^ I'rc)testant Christians to ;-;i\"e, both to the super- stitious and the sceptical, "a reason concerning the ho[)e that " is in them, }-et with meekness and fear." M...M:a \r, /,-:; X,,?: rSSj. m»r^g^Of\ |ltt ©pen ^£t\Ux to a aoman Catholic icml " If vi- ahiile ill iny word ilicii arc }l truly my li-v-ipk's, and '•yc -llnll kmiw tlic'tnilli, and llic ir'iiil) ^liall make yi lire." Si. joliii '. iii. ,',l, \-- •' \\- wi'U' 1.. nij^lit \\'u!i a piici- ; 1" nni vi- ilir >la\L-M>l mi'ii. I ( "r. vii. 2.;. It would indued l)e a stran.^c tliiliL;. .iiid iiiiii li lo be .K'i>lor. d, if we two. wh(j build u[i()n the same tbundatioii. :,li()iiid he 'iiuiblc u> attain to a better understanding and to ever increasin,:: inntual cMeein. 1 cerlainlv^exitress your inmost (oiuiilinn .i-, well as nn own. when I acknowledj^e that ■• other foundation i.ui no man lav . -.h.m •'that which is laid which is Jesu> Christ" d < 'or. lii. i i ). or to ex- press this in ('hrist's own words ; •• i am the wa\. the truth, and the -life.' (St. |ohn \iv. (>). - lle.iven alid e;M-th >li.dl |.as> awa\. but "my words shall not pass awa\.' (St. M.ui. wiv. ,^5). Since we know that Ciiristianits i.> tlf result ot Chn-lS own laboiu-s. the;, llis words and teachiuLi, I li> exami.le. Hi.- lite and ol Chri.st lia\e truly a peculiar power, and are uideed \ords of e\ eriastinu- hte. .^polscu b\ the Sea of ( lalile in p.trables aiul .-ermons. ei-iueen hundred _\ears a^o. they still fill the roiuid world. eduiatiiiL;. sireniitheiim- and MaulortuiL; ; thev i-ill t" the loM. ihe\ .-ustain tin- liying. l'ro( laiined hoiii lleaxen they find an eJio m the hearts of mankind. The) are I'ull o! ihe spirit of (lod. Do you remember this s.i> mu : •• wlial is a man pro- •• hted. if he shall -ain the whole world, and lo>e his own soul, or '• what shall a man Liixe in e\chan-;e for hi> soul .^ ' iSi. .Matt. \\i. j()). l'.\erv man. who i^ not (luite entangled in the me-^he^ of error, must concede to these wcjrds of Christ the highest authorit;.. The Apostles have also said mm h that is glorious and imi'crish.able, but no other human teaching can transcend that of Christ. We trace then. ( I speak also in your name) our faith back to Clirist. Nothing that we i; bclifv •. "I* in \\lii(h \\c iia\c rMnliilciUL'. il.irc conllict y-'nh Christ's <-!(.'ar .ill'! ili^tim t tf.u hin... 'Hk- \vi.>r( imiit In. U) us tlic liiulii -I nMiuIu'i!. in \vhi( h ium' wc vhal! In.- alt'.c ti> ('[ipD^j th(i-<-,' wIki makr iiM- "if the Icttfr of >( ri|itiiiv citliLT Air the ])ur]in^ • nf iK iid)- in,i; ' 'hfi-'tianiu , or in nnlrr ic (icpriw reason rnliii'lv of its |i(i\\xt. It i- Miu 'hat t iiri>t's \int'ui nien to ji.t >c-> xmiciliini,'' \\hi(h wi- t, •lot urasji. sonnthin.; cntir-lv in cnniiiri.'l.i.'risii.K' li i> ohIn (crtain ;nias(."^ ot' Hi-, ( haiai iri, (.■•.j't.' iall)' siu h a-, ate turufil to\wiril«> siiiVcrinL: huinaniiy, uiiii:li apiiLar iiLTlcclly disiir.'t I" >'ur coiisiiiuisiu'^-s. •• ( 'onK- unto int'. all \\- that lal)oi:r and "ari- hi.-a\y l.dm.'' (St. M itt. \:. :X». 'I'lum' ail- two t'catniv- \\lii( h I ^liould hkr to fimiha-i/r \i :\\\ as s]iL'ii.!l'\' .ui>''"i"ii-' ''1 < hri'.i '^ \\ord> and doctrinrs : du- pi-rfct; /(i'd to ((intY'r ii|a)n us. rnic low and true lih.a'i}. ihcsr .irv the t\\" aidestructihK' corni-r —tono iipon \vhi< h ( hri-t lnundcd hi> \\'orld c oni|UfriiiL; (iospcl. " i.o\e \onr •• L-nera.irs. l)le>> thcni that (.uim- you, do ^'"od to them tiia! hale \ou. "ami I'V.iV ior thi ni w lii< h despitenilly u>e you ami |.i im.i uie } oii. dial '•\'. uiae !e die < hildivn of your lallicr whieli i:i in iiia\en." (Si. Matt ■> . n- ■'5'- "I'ho'i shalt love d)y nei-hltou;- as ihxsell'.' (St. Malt. \Nii. j'l). " \\\(.\'^v not and \e shall iioi he indeed; eondtann *• uu! .aid \esh.ill not he ( iindrnnied : t'or^nxe and \e .-.hall he lor '•<;i\en.' Si. i.i'.ke \i. 57'. " .\s }e would that nieii .•-hould do to '•voa. do ye a.lso to them likewise." (St. laike\i. _; i ). 'I'luse and numerous other sayinL;s ot" Christ, uiu\ersall\- known and aee the most untirinu, lo\e. the widest toleration, and the hiuhest esteem towards our neiL;hl)Our. Nothin,L^ which is ( 'hristiaii in its chaiaeter, can coiv ni( t Willi thi.^ (lute. I'",\en the own mind." (Romans .\iv. 1-5.) So mu(di maybe said rc.i;.udinL: the (•oiiiiiuiiKliiiv.ni >>\ Ic. c. wliii h is tlicixinti' iiutst fsiK'ciallv ihr fiiiKlaincntal i.r!nci].Ic of every syslcin uf triif Cliris- limiiy. It !■■ iv't l''ss icrt.»in th.U ("iirist \vi>»liv.'i! tn iu.iIm.' m-- lU'ir, Ircc iVom ^iii. iVlx' iV'iiii >i>iiiti!al l)>in«lam.'. I lis wi'i'ds aii.' '• I'hc " truth shall make y.ni five." (St, John viii. ;,:.) Read. 1 i.ray vou. the saviiii-s ot" ( liri^i attentively, ami yua will he iilieil uiih the I oiiviitioM that this divine 'I'eaeher appeals iKJt only to the ( on-^. iem e hat to the reason of eat. .\hiit. xiii. i<;.) luriher. •' lie thai ivi l ;\ed seed •• into the LCO(xl ground is iie that heareth the word, and uniler>t.u'.deth ••it: which also he;'r"'' ♦•■'lit." (M. M:'U. xiii. .;;,.' '• I le.n- .Mid ••understand.'' (St. Nhill. \v. to.) •• .\re \e -.1 wiiii' mt iuide;-^;,uul •• inu als(.)?"' says Jesus to His disciple-. w!un ihey do nut ander.^;.nKl His parables, (,'^t. Mark vii. i S. ) He says. t'ur'Jier. to Hi- disciples, •• ['ereeive \e not vel. neither understand?" (••'i. Mark \ ii. 1 S. ) (Jin-ist's whole method ot' leaciiing is designed t(j .luaken ihouuht on the part of the listener, lur this reason he speaks in p.u-ahle:^. •.Ml " these things spake Je.-us unto the multitude in parables, and u :lliout '•a p.ir.ible spake he not unto ihem."' (>t. .Matt. \ii. ;,.j. 1 •" l'ni\e all •'thiniis; hold fast that wiuch is ^ood.'' (I ■|"hes>. \. _m . j The Apostles also insist upon the same thing. I'aii! says. •• The Lord ••give thee understanding in all things." iH 'J'im. ii. 7.) l-'urther, ■'that ye may pro\e what is that good, anci acceptable and perfe* t •• will of (lod. ' l'"urther, "Wherefore my deaa-ly l)eloved. tlee from '• idolatry. 1 speak as unto wise men : Jutlge >e wiiat I .■i.i\. '- 1 ' 'or. \. 15, If).) " lirethren, be not children in uridersLuuhn,-. howbeit. •• in malice be children, but m understanding be men." (1 Cor. \iv. .'o.i It is therefore undeniably true that, according to the teaching of Christ and the Apostles, the recei)tion of the Cospel must not take place without the application and exercise of the understanding. '' V'e are bought with a j)ril. 11' a|)|'i.al> u» (uir (onscieiicc and reason, antl iloiii^ this is tlic Inundation and t onu-r-stoiu' of the (".ospcl aiul " \vhos(»c\i.T shall fall on this stone shall be hrokon." (St. Math. .\\i. 4.4) I tht'ivfort- inainiain that, if I .unto he a ('hristian, 1 must neither siUnti- un ( cinsifnc*.- n<»r stillc iu\ undcistandinj;. Hut, althis point I lu.ii \nu sa\. how is it tht-n wluMi faith and ri'.ison tonic into eon- tliii with each otluM :* wliidi of these heavenly powers is then to tiive wav ; \\hi< li U> < on(|uer the other? My reply to these (|Uestions is thi- l',\ainine tiie iJihIe and i.-when- in it will you find this t ontr.idictiiiu which our misled .i^'e looks upon as irreconcilable. It is jusi this freiiuent reference to a su])posed conflict betwixt know- iedire Mul laiih. whi( h is such a bad si^'n of our times, a certain proof that the .^spirit of true (!hristianity has departed from us, and also th.u reason has gone widely astray, l-'-very man sound in heart and lualthy in spirit, must agree with Paul when, in his l-'.pistle to the Romans (i. 20), he proves the existence of (lod " His eternal power aiul ( 1. (Ihe.i 1 fmni his works and esp'-cially iVom the Creation of tin wdild. l''-\er\ iiiH- niust admit that'th^ I'niver.se /. c. the Kos- i\h». ihe well orvlered. organized world, pre-supposes a Creator, It is ()iil\ a (juite dis(»rdereil mind that « an ' :)ok upon the world as the result of act idem ; a world which, to use the expression of the great mvesti^ator, llelmhoU/, is so constituted '"as if the wisest wisdom "had put it in order. ' Long ago Socrates taught that it is folly to assimie the evisten* e of reason in man, and not also in the great unit) (if nature. Kven in that early age. he, exactly like I'aul, dis- covered, in the c onsideration of natural things, the foundation for belief in the existent e of ( lod : of an "all governing, all guiding, omnisi lent, and just IJeing." In all this, where is the disagreement betwixt science and taith ? 1 1 is !i(i doubt the case that we believe and must believe much of wiia; we never c:^n comprehend and of what lies far beyond our reason l!ut there is an essential difference betwixt that which is s!//>r(i .nil that which is ivntrn nitionein. I remind you here of the words of .in excellent theologian of the sixteenth century (Ostorodt): " Kor it is one thini: not to comjjrehend a matter, (because we '•are ready to acknowledge that a Christian ought to believe many "things whi(h he cannot understand with his reason) and another " thing it is when (jiir reason argues, points out, proves and main- •' tains that a < ertain something cannot in any manner be or exist." No doubt we are bound to believe much that we cannot behold, and of which our minds tan f(;rm no picture. lUit nowhere are we com- n mantled to ri'nard .i> tun.' iliat .iL;.iin-i< li «nir mulcrstaiulin.u bears witness, revolts and [)rotests. Sm Ii a faith would lie deail o\ itselt" and alt(»;;ethei unworthy ol a reasonable being. It it were uur ditty to believi' that w'uc h is (ontrar} tn reason, we should no doubt llnd a roniniand to that efl'ei t in tlu' hol\ Si ripiuies. Instead of that we lind csa« tly the opposite. < luisi exait^froui u-. an luiderstanding of the < ios])el. The teaching ot t hrisi iherelort [)lainl\ i ondenuis those who de- mand tVom a believer that he should deny hnnself the use of reason. \ nuHt take up the hol\- Scripture with enlightened reason, and ap- proj)riate it ; I nuisi m.ike use ot reason in order lu judge whether that which is called Christian accords wiili. ui is in opixjsition to, the Word ofdoil. It I hear the commatui .iddres.-,epress. distim t. simple words of Christ himsell. Here there is uo choice. It is either with ( iiri-! or with Kome ! Well I remember the iii-.( riptioil on the obelisk of the \'atican, " Clu ii/iis :iiicif, Ciiiistiis rfi^naty Christ u.\ iinf'cnjl.' (" Christ con- '|uers. Christ is King. < 'hrist governs.'; In full ww of the i'apal palace, these words are m their proper place. Christ will also coii- i|uer the I'ope. Thus ihe choice i^ easy : neither can it be dilticult for you. Christ ancl 11 is ( ,(l^pel ought to gosern anil penetrate the whole man. It is impossible to renounce the e.xercise of our reason if we desire to be preserved from falling into the gravest errors. And rea- •son, or sound conmion sense must be continually made use of to stir up and purify the conscience, if we are to make ,iny progress on the steep road towards piuit"icaiion and |)erfection. The .\|)Ostle writes. '• Beloved, i)elie\e not every spirit, but prove the .spirits whether they '• be of (iod. ' (I b-'hii iv. i.). Krom this we see that, even at that early time, when the remembrance of Christ and His teaching must still have been tresh and vivid, voices and views arose, against which the .Apostle felt constrained to w.irn the Church : lalse prophets who abused the name of Christ. .\ye. if He. the divine leacher, were to come again today, and were to enter into the midst of the Koman Church, He would surelv call out " Woe unto you ' Has my teach- '' ing come to this.^ Depart iVom me ! " In what way tould we i)0S- sibly ex( use ourselves ? It could not be done, because we pos.sess His words, the words of everlasting life, by which we are commanded 10 to test the spirits that aro IVmiii I liin. W'c should he unable to escape His iniuleinnation hy interposing; some one else, whose opinion we had adii|ited. (hri.-^l acknow led'^e^ no mediator hetuixi 1 1 inisdl' ami men, i'.ath indix idual iiiu^t enter imo per.->(jiial relalion>hip with llini, it' he wishes to he partaker ot His sa\ing truths. 1 am (|uite willing,' to aL;ree with vou, if \()ii sa.y with, respei't to the ('hri.avinL;s. hear interest. ;ind in no ])()«hall have more to say bye and l)\e. Here 1 take the libertv of doubtiiiL; whether your submission to Rome is comi)lete. .\i cordin:;- to the declaration of infallibility, the I'ope alone can de< ide as to which of his utterances are to be regarded as infallible rules 111 what concerns fiith and morals. 'I'his matter is no longer dependent on the subjeitixe interjjretation of the individual. It is (liiite certain thai the Pope ccjiisiders the propositions in his so ( ailed Svllabus as inf'allible rules, to wliich the faithful have humbly to siil mit themselves. On this point there is no doubt whatever amoi. consistent Romish theologians. Ry his dec laration of infallibility, the I'ope has ( aused the propositions to be regarded as truths of the highest inijjoriance, v,hit:h every Roman C'atholic is bound in con- science to believe. I'or instance, the 17th i)aragraph forliids anvone to entertain the belief that those who are not Roman Catholics can attain everlasting salvation. The Pope, the \'icar of Christ : aye, the \'icar of Cod, as the Archbishop of Cologni lately expressed it, prohibits ycui from believing that Nour departed mother can ever attain to heaven. Therefore, 1 take the liberty of contradicting your words : you cannot be an Ultramontanist. Vou cannot submit your- self to the Popes ruling. It is im[jossible for you to do it. Vou are not an IHtraniontanist and not a thorough Roman Catholic, 1 myself entertained for many )ears an aft'ectionate reverence for the Pope. I'Aen now I well remember the time when he placed himself at the head of the movement for Italian freedom. I had seen him .so often and heard his voice in chant and sermon. In the midst of 11 tilt; iVii^^lufiil worldlincss ;i:iil corniplion of llic Ruinisli Church, th-j venerable form of l'iu> the Ninth was toiichini; and urateful to lu;-. Ihit a ,L;real clKU^e has ( onie o\er him since the time \s-hen all the ftrorls toward:! j.olitu'a! and spiritual lilieriv ( omhined liieiiiselves under his name. \\'!\' -oon, indeed, the darl; shadows were j)er- reiwd in advaiii e of the e\ents whiih weu. to I'oilow. I'll'.-;, once su mild and beneficent, fell a pre)' to the must terrible iniluences. .\e\er did there live a Pope who has so often and so continuously been occupied in cursing ami c(jiidemnii"i.;'. " IWes.-, tiio^e w1k)i in>e " yoti.' .says (.'!n-isi.. In >[iiie of all this, 1. still conlinued to entertain a certain amount o\ reverence lor the vener.ible old man. .\t la>t, I wo years at'ter the Italians had taken [)v>s^e-^sion i;f Rome. 1 read the well auihenticated wor(l> to which I'ius L;a\ e lUterance when describing the condition of Rome aher ilie occupation. In caie of the great audiences held by him, the I'oi)e used these wards: '• in ■■ this liol\ city houses o( ill-fame ha\e arisen, and what is slill wcjrse, ■• I'rotcstant ( lunches." In this way did J'ius e\;iress him.^elf re- garding the places of worship of my co-religionists. 1 will not dwell upon this be' anse my imnosl soul n'\-olls indig.'ianliy to hear duis described, tiie o^uiet. modest <'hui''hes oi I'.vangehi al (.'hristians and of the so perseciUed and niart}'red W'aldensians uf Italv. who were thrown down from high towers and preci|/itous rocks al the command of the Romish imiuisilors. I know the>e unembelished houses of worship, and can testify that true Chrisianitx- is taught in them. Chris- tianity strictly in accordance with the New Testament. Dear triend, you call yourself an ultramontanist, and yet, as 1 belie\'e, y(ni were never on the other side of the mountains, and do not know the con- dition of the Romish ("hurch in Italy from personal obser\ation. With your deep religious feelings, your love of truth .ind faithfulness to convicdon, who can say that you would call yourself an ultramon- tanist if you actually knew, by autopsy, the Romish Church in Italy, and the jjitiable and even desperate condition of the people ? When you walk into the celebrated church Ara Cceli at the Capitol, there you read the inscription " By every mass said at this altar a soul is freed from purgatory." The altar ten stei)s distant will not do this, and of course the fee at the first altar is four or five times as high. This is the way in which the Pope localizes the power of the Divine grace and pity. Who, but the Roman Catholic Church, l)ears the essential part of the blame for the pitiable religious condition of the Italian people ? Catholic Christians like yourself are not to be found in Italy; the n people i\o not understand why we Germans have such interest ir> religion as the highest good of man. How you would be astonished and indeed most painfully affected, if you were to hear (as I have heard (|uite generally in Italy), cultivated men, worthy of all respect in other particulars, express absolutely irreligious views I I have still a lively recollection of the terrible way in which celebrated and learned men in Italy expressed either anger or contempt when the conversa- tion turned upon the Church and its officials. A man like X — , in Rome, for whom I entertain the greatest respect, a man much visited by misfortune, was unable tc find words to express the way in which he from his deepest soul abhorred the Papal rule. You would be horrified if I were to repeat to you the opinions which I have heard generally expressed by the cultivated men of Italy regarding eccle- siastical institutions. Perhaps the most frightful result of the religious condition of Italy is the manner in which family life is poisoned and destroyed, and that, too, in a certain respect by these very institutions. W'hile the wife cannot give up the church, the husband relapses into irreligion. " My wife may go to church if she cannot leave it alone, but I will " never put my foot there, and no priest shall dare to cross my thres- "hold." Such and similar expressions on the part of the men are fi-equenily heard in Italy. The priest |)OSsesses the heart of the wife, the husband only her outward form. Man and wife sit together at the same table but are inwardly separated. The Romish Church has ex- ercised the most withering influence on the religious conciousness of the Italian people. In my minds' eye I place opposite to, and com- pare with each other, Roman Catholic Calabria and Evangelical Nor- way, Catholic Sicily in its horrible social and moral degradation, with Protestant Iceland and its virtuous population. I might elaborate such comparisons, but my letter would be endless. The Church, bears, although not exclusively, yet principally, the blame. How has the religious life of the Romanic nations, the noblest and most gifted of the globe, been developed under the rule of the Romish Church ? The Church, which should bind men together as brothers, does the opposite among Roman Catholic nations. It separates the cultivated from the uncultivated. The latter relapse into superstition and fanaticism, while the cultivated part of the population turns aside from the Church and religion and too often embraces materialism. Look at the ecclesiastical pageants in the Komish churches, or the pilgrimages in France and then remember the words of Christ, " God is a Spirit, and they that worship Him "must worship Him in spirit and in truth." (St. John iv. 24.) If you do this then will you become aware of the wide difference be- tween the teaching of Christ and that of the Pai)al Church. To *' worship in truth" ! the touchstone of a church, the educator of the human race is truth and truthfulness. Well, what is the character of the utterances of the highest authorities of the Romish Church ? Not lies certainly, nor truth either, but ambiguousness. This Komish art of speaking begets cLceitfulness, and undermines veracity among the faithful. We frequently hear the view expressed that the Romish Church, with its form of worship, captivating the heart and feelings, is more adapted to the peculiarities of the Romanic peoples than the simpler worship of the Evangelical Church. But no opinion could be more erroneous and unjust. I^ook at the glorious beginning which the Reformation had in Italy, France and even Sjjain. In France alone, millions of men embraced the new faith, and, three hundred years ago, liberty of conscience and the exercise of their religion were con- ceded to them. How ver) different would have been the develop- ment of the Christian church if the Reformation among the Romanic nations had not been suppressed with fire and crushed in blood I Many stupendous deeds of wickedness stain the histor) of hu- manity, liut it describes nothing more terrilile than those deeds by which the Romish Church and the governments under its influence rooted out our co-religionists from the earth in those fair southern countries. Do you remember the deed of horror by which, on St. Bartholomew's night (1575), five thousand Protestants were sacrificed in Paris. In Rome a Te Deiim was celebrated when the news arrived of the consummation of this terrible crime. Have you perliaps heard of the Cevennes war in which thousands of Protestants, who had taken refuge in the Cevennes mountains in order to preserve their faith, were hunted and killed like wild beasts ? In France the Protestants were opposed in great wars, which cost the kingdop ver a million of its best citizens, but in Spain the new faith did not rise to such power. There the Reformation was not suppressed by massacres, great sieges (such as that of La Rochelle in 1528), or by hunting human beings. In Spain the Incjuisition did its awful work in silence. Over thirty thousand of the best and most innoc t persons were burnt alive in Spain alone, and probably nearl} .1 hundred thousand in the Spanish and Portuguese lands on this and the other side of the ocean. Not less is the number of those whose mouldering bones were disinterred and publicly burnt, in 14 order that their heresy, discovered after death, might be expiated. 'I'he Court graced with lis presence these exeiiitions, to witness whidi was considered a good work. At that time, there were tlnis pro- duced in Spain a numerous class of persons dishonoured, destitute of rights and outlawed, who M'ere correctly des* riberl in the language of the officials as the ".-.ons ot the burned"' {//ijos t/os gucinados). Does it appear wrong in "\e thus to remind you of those frightful deeds, which we would fain wipe out of hum:in history with our tears? Js ii wrong to !)ear wiuiess .igainst the Romish Church, which claims to be al)!e to make disposition of the treasure of mercy betjueathed by Christ? Xo I No ! 'I'lie memory of these martyrs '~f the Christian faith must not be allowed to die. 'rorcjuemada .V. s approved l)y the Romish Pope as chief judge in matters of faith in Castile, l.eon, \'alencia, and Arragon. He performed his duties in such a fearful manner, that during his fifteen years activity (1483- r498) eight thousand eight hundred human beings, the images of their Creator, were burnt alive l)y his orders. I beg you to reflect a moment on what it means to burn a human being alive. If there is really a devil, he could not contrive anything more devilish than this. At the thought of it the genius of humanity covers his face. Just as in Spain and Portugal, the reaction raged in a similar way in Italy. Thus were the Latin nations filled with fear and horror, their religious life poisoned and annihilated, and that which we mourn to day, fanaticism among the masses, and indifference among the educated, is the harvest from that terrible seed of blood and fire, sown by the Romish Church in the i6th and 17th centuries. A milder age has replaced those centuries of woe. The State stretches out a protecting hand over tortured humanity. But still the infallible Pojie Pius in one of the paragraphs of his Syllabus con- demns anew the opinion that physical inmishment ought not to be inflicted on heretics. ^Vell I know, that you mourn and deplore with me all the inno- cent blood of pious christians thus shed and which still cries to heaven. Ikit I hear you say " That is only the frail human exterior of the "Catholic Church which you have described, subject to all the " changes of the times, ^^'e cannot make the Church responsible for " all the crimes which have been committed in its name ; it is the " evane.scent exterior which so frequently occasions prejudice and " deep misunderstanding." But you must remember that you are not allowed to form a subjective opinion as to what is suiierficial and what es.sential to the Romish Church j in that matter the only judge 15 is llic Ivomisii 1 upo. llic inriillihlc I'opc, Ik- who ( ;iiioiii/cd the S[)nnish in([ui.sil()r I'ctcr Arhiics, another uf those wlio were concernt'cl in hurninj; tlieir fellnwiiKn. It ai)[)cars ihcrcforc that the Roman Calhuhc (Church reveres as a saint, a man. a »le\il in the shaj^e uf a man, who burnt to ashes man)- of tlie hest nt! nmsi iiUKxenl hi. !ny>,. Tliis saint is regarded as ])ossessing works of supererogation, and as an intercessor with the ali-mercii'ul (iod. Exercising his infalHI)le autliority, Pius the ninth pronounc ed the canonization of this saint. The same Pope conferreti the same honor on a king whose only title to saintsiiip consisted in his haxing. witli his own hands, hiid a billet of wood upon the i)ile at the slake where it was intended lo burn a man oii account of his f.iith. And this same Pius, he wno so uninterruptedly hurls iiis ana- themas against those of other religions persuasions and es[)ecially against those who do not believe in him, is to-''av, bv the silent con- sent of more than a hundred million persons, regarded as the \'icar of (Iod and Christ! of Ilim who says "Come unto me, all ye that '■ labour and are heavy laden, an.d 1 will gi\e you rest. Take my " yoke ujjon you, and learn (jf me, for 1 am meek and lowl}- in heart, '•and ye shall fmd rest unto your souls. l''or my yoke is e.i.sy, and ''my burden is light." (St. Matt. \i. 28-30.) With deep emotion and from the dejith of my conscience, I must express to you, dear friend, my (onviction that among the mys- terious things which God has permitted in this world, the develo[)- ment of the Roman Catholic Church ai)pears to be the most incom- prehensible. If anything could shake my faith in Providence and in the Divine (Government of tile world, it would l)e the existence and activity of this church. Allow me now to say a w^ord regarding the dogma of infallibility in which, according to your belief, the Catholic faith has found its most pregnant expression. Inse])arably connected with it is the doc- trine of the Universal Episcopate regarding which Poi)e Cregory the Great (A.D. 590-604) pronounced the following judgment ; lie said it was "born of vanity: a scandal in the Church; a wicked undertak " ing against the commandment of (iod, against the Gospel, against " the laws of the Church, against the Church constitution, against "the di'-nity oi the bishops : an injury to the Church as a whole and "a llasphemy." These are the \ -ords of the Great Po^jc Gregon. 0//i/,y riij/:um in sc' Hlvlsiim dcsolabitiir. (l-lvery kingdom divided against itself shall fall.) The history of the Vatican Coimcil lies wide open before the ■eyes of every searcher .ifter truth. All the n'rciinistnnces connected with it are well known. There, the most ( elebrated bishops in the world, the representatives of the largest dicjceses solemnly protes- ted a.^ninst the i)roceedings of the Council "in order," as they wrote, "that we may in this manner, before men as well as before (lod's ••judgment seat, disavow the responsibility for its disastrous con- •• .M.i|uenres. Of this the ])reseni writing shall be an everlasting proof." TniK a certain school of thought in the Roman Catholic Church has found its expression and conipletion in the new dogma, but its renun- ciation of true Christianity is also complete. In view of such pro- Hcedings and ads on the part ot the Roman Catholic Chinch, the e\angelical Christian remembers that at the Reformation certain |)arts of the Apocalypse. — I will not quote them — were interpreted as having reference to '-'(jme and the Pojjes. Nevertheless, it i^ the case that besides the fiital influences which have gained the mastery under I'ius, and which threaten to divide and destroy our dear regenerated Fatherland, there exists another and miU'.er current of thought which is truly Ca'holic without occasioning the frighthil conse(iuences, which, bringing ruin on the Church, came lo light in 1S70. 1 am utterly unable to persuade myself thar the tJatholic Church is identical with the Papal Church in the form which the latter has assumed before our eyes. Is it possible that so many ]>i()us and enlightened men and ecclesiastics (suffice it to mention one of them. Bishop Diepenbrock) should have been completely in error, when the\ looked upon themselves as faithful and obedient servants anil i)atrotic citizens of a State in which religious eipiality ])revailed, without, on that account, doing violence to their religious convic- tions? No.no, they were and are good Catholics, faithful and (jbedient officials and honoured citizens. They certainly held the o]jinion that the State is obliged to acknowledge the equality of the ^ari()^s confessions, and they did not give up the hope that even their evangelical and hcbrew fellow-citizens might be saved. But anyone who now acknowledges the Romi-^h Poi)e as supreme judge in mat- ters of faith and morals, and is conseipiently ])reijared, in obedience to orders, to sacrifice to him his leason and even his very conscience, such a man must consider tne principle of religious equality as "• madness," and look upon his fellow citizens of other persuasions as doomed to eternal perdition. At the same time I cannot under- stand how a man, entertaining such convictions, can be a good ser- vant and citizen of any State in which religious eut he nt)t ye called Rahhi, for one is your master even Christ, and all ye are brethren.'" (St. .Matt, xxiii. 9.) These words of Christ pronounce an annihilating judgment nut Christian freedom of belief will become greater in the same degree as we give room to Christian love " to the love of Cod shed abroad in our hearts "' (Romans v. 5.) (i. V(;.M RATH. IJONN, F.asler, .'S'jb.