IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 / 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 U^|28 ||2.5 
 
 ,50 "^ li^ 
 
 Ii, 11^ 1 2.2 
 
 I.I 
 
 WUt- 
 
 
 nil 1 8 
 
 1.25 
 
 1= 
 
 1.4 1.6 
 
 — = 
 
 V] 
 
 <^ 
 
 ,%. 
 
 m 
 
 /a 
 
 
 Oy 
 
 /A 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIM STRS^T 
 
 WCBf/TER, rl.Y. 14580 
 
 V '6) 872-4 soy 
 
 ^ 
 
 i^ 
 
 ,\ 
 
 :\ 
 
 \ 
 
 ^9> 
 
 V 
 
 
 rv 
 
 o^ 
 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The 
 to tl 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommagde 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurde et/ou pelliculde 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 □ Coloured maps/ 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 □ Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 Lareliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intdrieure 
 
 Blank leaves added durii.g restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 11 se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout^es 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela dtait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 filmdes. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl^mentaires: 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6X6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mdthode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquds ci-dessous. 
 
 I I Coloured pages/ 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommag§es 
 
 Pages restored and/oi 
 
 Pages restaur^es et/ou pellicul^es 
 
 I — I Pages damaged/ 
 
 I 1 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 The 
 post 
 of tl 
 film 
 
 Orlfl 
 
 begi 
 
 the 
 
 sior 
 
 oth( 
 
 first 
 
 sion 
 
 or il 
 
 ^/ 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages ddcolordes, tachet^'js ou piquees 
 
 □ Pages detached/ 
 Pages d^tachees 
 
 \/ 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 D 
 
 Quality indgale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel supplementaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 The 
 shal 
 TINi 
 whi 
 
 Mar 
 diff< 
 enti 
 beg 
 righ 
 reqi 
 met 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 film^es d nouveau de fapon d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmd au taux de reduction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 IPX 14X 18X 22X 
 
 I I I I I I I I I I I./I I I 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 University of British Columbia Library 
 
 L'exemplaire filmi fut reproduit grdce u !a 
 g6n6rosit6 de: 
 
 University of British Columbia Library 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec l« 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la netteti de l'exemplaire filmd, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimde sont filmis en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont film6s en commen^ant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol ^^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning "END "), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbole "^^ signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbole V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 filmds d des taux de reduction diff6rents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre 
 reproduit en un seul clich6, il est film6 A partir 
 de Tangle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche d droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nicessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mdthode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 • 
 
 • 
 

 '0 
 

 " — *. 
 
 BRIE ¥ U E V 1 E W 
 
 OF lUAl SlXllO.N (>F Tin: UKfORt 
 
 Fiio.\i mis 
 
 SELECT COMMI'l'TKF, 
 
 OP THE 
 
 IlOrSK OF ASSEMBLV OF I ITKH CANADA, 
 
 APrOINTED TO 
 
 REPORT Oy THE STATE OF THE PROVJXCE, 
 
 WHICH ADyjOUTS TO TIH: RIM'OUT 
 
 OF THE EARL OF DURHAM. 
 
 ItY THE EDITOR OF " THE EXAMLWERr 
 
 J'OKO.NHJ: 
 
 rRiMi;i> .\J I'm: j:x.\.mim:h omci., 
 
 IH.'IO. 
 
TO 
 
 THE RIGHT HONOUR ABLK 
 
 THE EARL OF DURHAM, G. C. b. 
 
 &c. &c. &c 
 
 This vlndicaiion of His Lordship from tho charges brought ag inst liin. 
 on behalf of the "Family Compact" of Upper Canada, in a Ilcport of a 
 Select Committee of the House of Assembly, signed by C. A. Hagcrmaii, 
 Attorney General,— Henry Sherwood, Q. C, eon of Judgo Sherwood, and 
 nephew of Judge Jones,— W. B. Robinson, brother of Chief Justice Robin- 
 son and Superintendent of the Welland Canal,— William Chisholm, a post- 
 master, Collector of Customs & Colonel of MiHtia,— John I'rincc, a Colonel 
 of Militia and late Commandant on the Western frontier,— J. A. H. Powell, 
 Sheriff of the Bathurst District during pleasure,— R. Rollo Hunter, a Lieu- 
 tenant Colonel of Mihtia,— is, on behalf of a grateful and admiring people, 
 
 most respectfully inscribed by 
 
 His Lordship's most obedient 
 
 And very humble ;crvx.Tit, 
 
 THE AUTHOR 
 
i 
 
 R E V I E W. 
 
 if a 
 laii, 
 iiiid 
 
 jiiel 
 ,'ell, 
 ieu- 
 iple, 
 
 The favourable .iianner in which Lord Durham's masforly 
 Report has been received in all parls ofBrilish America by the 
 groat majority of the people, and the tnanifcst disinclination 
 <'vinccd by the organs of the Oligarchical Compact to enter on 
 nny discussion of the principles of government, the applica- 
 tion of which to these Ojlonics, his Lordship has su strongly 
 recommended, have hitherto lendered it unnecessary for the 
 supporters of those principles lo do more than give expression 
 fo the general admiration felt by the community. AVc feel 
 warranted in asserting that no document has ever been |)romu!- 
 gated in British America that has given such general satisfaction 
 as this Report. Copious extracts liave been published by ncarlv 
 all the journals in the Canadas. Thousands of copies have 
 been distributed iu pamphlet form, and the demand instead of 
 abating, is greater than ever. 
 
 Although public opinion has been tlius clearly manift^stod in 
 ils favour, the baneful Compact, whose misdeeds have been so 
 ililly, so ably, and so eloquently exposed, have not yielded lo 
 the force of trutli. They feci' that if Lord Durham's views 
 should be carried out by tiie Home Government, tlierc will bo 
 an end lo their influence and power, and they have accordingly 
 spared no exertions to damage the political character of IJi.i 
 Lordship and shake public confidence in his statements. 
 
 A select committee of Ib.c House of Assembly was appointed 
 '' on the State of the Province" at an early period of the late 
 Session, on the motion of some of the Compact party, consist- 
 ing with one exception, of members who have voted Vn the jiii. 
 norihj on all the leading qu(>stions which have come before Par- 
 liament. The chairman of this committee was Mr. Hagerman, 
 Attorney General, and one of the principal joints of the Family 
 Compact, and it is generally understood that the Pvcport, which 
 has been presented and of which 2000 copies were ordered to 
 be printed, was drawn out by liim, and although signed by all 
 the members of the comuatteo, we feel warrantr'd in asserting 
 that some of those gontlemon are dissatisfi d with considerable 
 poi-)i(in'5 of it. 
 
 In the first page of this IJeport, we find in largo capitals, 
 '* i;\AM.MorRj.y Annrrr.D," while the dale at the conclusion is 
 '^Commons flou^^o of Assembly" instead of "Committee 
 llnom," a piece ol' cliicanerv which if perpetrated by a Refor- 
 mer would have been the theme, and justly so, of afl the Torv 
 papers of the Province. We entertain not the slightest doubt 
 that 9 out of every 10 who read this docmnent, parlicularlv in 
 England, will suppose that it was adopled /;-/ Ihr IJou^r, insiead 
 of i)y a Sclec! Co/,invl/ee nominated by "the Compact. The 
 IIousc of Assembly has not prolited by tiie lesson, taught them 
 m the case of the (u-ievaiice Repnrt, ihat it is dangerous to or- 
 4cv a large number of copies of a document to be printed n>: 
 
tvliicii tliey do iiol a|H)i'oVi'. 'I'lit; luuri; lad ul" j.nutiii!-; ii takpu 
 ;i'i a iiiMili of nppru'talioii, and wi- sliall llntl accurJuitly that 
 thi-i KopMrt will Ix'talu'ri as iljo dclihornfo opinio,!! of ilio IIouj-h 
 of Assembly of rppci ("aii.\.'.i. 
 
 It lias, \vu undcistaiv.l, boon assorted in tlio Houso by one of 
 ihe monibcr.s of tlio coininiUco, that Iho words '• urianitudiisly 
 Cidoptod'' and the dato '•('oinnions House of Assonihly*' in- 
 • toad oi' " Coniiiiilleo Uooin'' womo iiisertod Iji/ inistakc. How 
 iico errors of this descriplion could be insorted by mistake m 
 dili! rent, parts of llio doeitniont ; and how l\Ir. Ilagornian who 
 v,-c luulfM'.stand corrcc/fd llw yjrow'i-.'could avoid seeing them it is 
 not lor us to deleiniine. \\\) give it us our opinion, and we 
 vhall Ix! sii[)p<)iled in il by all who nnderst.ind the character of 
 the meinbeis of tin' I'aniily t\)mpact, that there was ?jo misluLc 
 about the mailer, f'opios of tlie lleport are already on the 
 ivay to the leading jonrtmls of ICngiand, and it will be roeeived 
 ;ii^- the unanimous opinion of the JIou.se of Assembly of I'pper 
 C'oiirida. 
 
 The Report of ihe f^dt'ct Conimiltee is divided hito 
 two parts. The llrst is taken ui) with an account of i,ho various 
 incursions made into the I'rovim^.' iVom the L nilod Stattjs, lt.\r 
 whicli the Home (loverninenl is almost ordered to demand sa- 
 tisfaction from t lie American governmont ; in other wonls Mr. 
 I'higerman and his friends want to invohe the two countries in 
 •.V 11', Thi; .second part of the report is that in which the people 
 of this I'royinco ure more particularly interested, and to that 
 alone shall our attention b-^ ul present directed. It is in fact, a 
 ri'\icw of liord Durliam's Mt'[)ort. 
 
 It commences by informing us of the disappoirilment felt by 
 the loyal pojiulation of the I'vovince, i. e. the Compact, at the 
 uppointnient of Lord Durham, and tlicir further apprehensions 
 \. liL-nthey heard the names of his Chief Siicrelary and other 
 nltaches. Finding however that there was no remcfli/, the com- 
 pact determined to receive his Lordship with confidence, in the 
 liopo that he would fall into their hands, as his vain or weak 
 pV'*«l«f-essors had invariably done. We deem it unnecessary to 
 Hvitioe the censure bestowed ujjon various acts of f,i0rd Dur- 
 h.iar s adininistralion, particularly his ordinances disposing of 
 Iti;^ political prisoners, because the aitl/ior of the, Urfiort, anil 
 the leading memltors of his party ONprcsscd ihnir strpnfrcsl ron- 
 Jldence ia Lord Durham oflcrnW these acts had been conmiiltcd, 
 and we are therefore bound to believe that their present disap- 
 probation is the result of disappointtnent at finding that his 
 .'..ordship ha.'; escaped their snares and given a faithful account, 
 of the stale ol' the Province. 
 
 .Mr. Hagerman thinks thai the statements f>f TiOrd Durham 
 ."liould be received with caution because his Lordship never re- 
 ':ided in this Province, and paid only a twenty four hours visit 
 f'l Toronto. Mr, Ilagerman has perliaps forgotten that one ol' 
 Lord Durham's first acts wa.« to invite communications from all 
 parties In (he Canndn^;. TJie effect, of Ihi.s wise and statesman- 
 I'J-.o course was, that his L*?rd^liip received ;fas his R'.por^ 
 
Wi. 
 
 r.!(jai-ly prove.- ;i Dns^ of valuable! inrormatioa /'/'i-J/i //^';'.V(ji;.s' <</ 
 u/l {/(irlirs, ami as lie had tluj nifuiis jf asccrtiiitiin^ iho cliu- 
 ird'tcr (»r (jvf'i y individual wlio tid'lir.sscd liiin, I:'j rnii litllo 
 clianco ol' bring iiniiostHl upon, 
 
 'Vho. lirst oxncption wliicli "NJr. IFagorniau lakes to tlio Report 
 is tlio tlivision ol' parties in this rnninco iiilo three cliissrs. — 
 I'"ainil_\ ( 'onipaet ( 'anaih'ans, — lloforni (Janadians, — aiul I'rilisli 
 emigrants. Mr. Jlagernian should liavc recollecied that tht; 
 ve.porL divides ih.y Uritish |)arty into two classes, 'I'ory and Li- 
 beral. This is an important poinl, as a few months will prove 
 to Air. Hagernian's entire; dissaJislaclion. 
 
 In reviewing that pari of the foport wliieli treats of the par- 
 ties, Mr. Ilai^erninn most diHingeniunisIy asserts that Lord Dur- 
 ham desired the; J-'an^ly (.'ompact party to be put down to malic 
 way for the llefe-rn; party. This isiintnie. Lord [Jnrham has 
 not advocated ihe' pnttinif down of any party ; ho //rrv assert rd 
 the prineipio that the mnj(jrily ishonid induence the govennneiK, 
 a principle wlueh Mr. IJagevnian knows I'ldl well is strictly 
 Hritish and constitutional. 
 
 Mr. f fagerman says " it is somcwhnt singular to lin<l k re- 
 presented tliat til' Ilei'ormers of the Province compJaiJi of the 
 existence or inniionce of a Family Compact comp<i*je<d of per- 
 sons who are re[)resented to bo of the same origin with them- 
 selv(,'s.'' This may indeed be singular in Mr.dagerman's opinion 
 hut it required his vnparullelrd asfiurancc to deny a fact whicli 
 is assorted by live out of seven Journals in fiie city of Toronto 
 and by almost the entire press in other parts of the I'rovinc(\ 
 I'ut, says Afr. nagerman, " the diiferenccs wliich have existeti 
 in the Province h-i.ve pvoceoded from political disagreements that 
 have nnhap[)ily grown op in tlus as in every other community." 
 Does the "JJepiv.!*' d(;ny this obvious truth ? Most certaudy not. 
 it point:; out cleaily thai the compact party was devoteti to the 
 njaintenance (d' ihc l'^[)isconal Church, tlitit the niaj()riity of the 
 (M!Ople was against them, and that the lleformer.s found that 
 success at tlie eleclions insured then) lit'tle practical benefit, be- 
 cause the oOicial party not being removed when in the minority 
 continued to inHu'iice the policy of the ('Jovernmeut. 
 
 Mr. ilagerman will not lind many persons to agree witjj him 
 in the opuiion thai f.oid Durham bans designatetl "the great 
 body of 41k; peojde of the country as a coaioHCt," We are 
 p )'::iiively ama>;ed at the impudeit barefaced assertion in defiance 
 of [jublic opinion Lind of truth that the notorious "compact"' 
 lius any piotension to represent "the great body of the pco|)Ie." 
 Surely people will ask themselves this obvious question. L' 
 the " (-'ompact" repreS'Pnt the great body of the peo[)le why 
 are they afraid of responsible governmeni ? 
 
 'J'lie next porliiin of Mr. Ilagerman's report is a denial of 
 the truth of fjord Durham's assertion that there is a British party 
 jealous of the Family Compact. Hero again we are astonish- 
 ed at the assurance of tin learned gentleman. The i'act is ns 
 %(;eU known to Af--. ffiiix^.'nnan as is his own existence. Tu 
 prove a negative, tjiree m"mbcr.-: of the se!'!:t eomieiilee '.d^a. 
 
 $ 
 
m 
 
 - ■■* 
 
 r, Ml-:vll',\\. 
 
 Ii;t\.; Iiilfl) emigrat.d aii.' iristiinnctl. 'I'lic- liisl is Cdl. I'riin'i'. 
 Now t;veVy one faiiiilitii' witli l'p])i<r Caimil;i pnliiios knows 
 tliat Col. Prince is actually a principal leader of the very Hii- 
 tisli party (l(;scriljc(i by LoVd Dnrluun. He is intnnati! witli Un; 
 very pur^oiis from whom Lord Durham derived his information 
 and is forward on all occasions in dennnncing the " Fani'ly 
 Comjiact.*' 'I'lio same remark applies, to a certain extent, to 
 Col. (iowan. If the iiritisli parly have made representations to 
 Lord Durham which coming from men of high standing in society 
 and nnimpcached character he Jias given credence to, and if af- 
 terwards their leader have endorsed a document denying the trulli 
 of tlic very statements which his party have fnrnisheil, not on 
 Lord Duriiam be the blame or the discredit, but on themselves. 
 J^nt we do not believe the British party will so act. Col. Prince 
 lias signed a lengt'ay docnmcnt, on the stale of the province part 
 (»f which, that unconnected with liord Durham's Report lie pro- 
 bal)lv approved, and which lie liad lU't much time to reflect on, 
 but we feel assured tliat Col. Prhice would never vote for the 
 mhj)! inn oi' the re|)0rt as a whole. 
 
 The next instance is Mr. Ilunler. ?s()W a more nnforlunale 
 .case Mr. llagerman could not have l)rought forward. Mr. 
 Hunter is member for Oxford a strong Preform County. At the 
 Jati; election very few ol' the Ueformors vot 'd, and the contest 
 was between two Tories. It turned on British and Canadian 
 interest and we are credibly informed that Mr. Hunter has 
 iiimself stated that he did not get 10 Canadian votes. Could a 
 stronger proof be brought of the truth of Lord Durham's state- 
 ment ? 
 
 The alhision of Lord Durham to British emigrants lieing 
 Ij-jated as Aliens refers evidently to the restraints on members 
 of the legal and medical professions which Mr. llagerman well 
 knows have licon louclhj complained of and to evade whi di a 
 iipccial act has been passed in favour of one of the very j.aifics 
 alluded to in the report as a reward for services rendered to the 
 Province. Now Lord Durham happened to think that such a 
 privilege was Mr.Prince's right and ought not to have been given 
 as a reward ov compliment. 
 
 The long list given of British emigrants fdling lucrative of- 
 fices is no proof of Lord Durham's being in error more parti- 
 cularly as several of the parties natni.'d are known to enlcrlain 
 the greatest jealousy of the Compact, and have wc doubt not 
 expressed it to Lord Durham. 
 
 The next branch of Mw Ilagvrman's document pnrporl=^ to 
 be "a refutation of the opinions and statements of Lord Dur- 
 ham"who it is said obtained his information by meansof''agei]ts" 
 who again acquired it from incompetcMit persons. Mr. llager- 
 man will hardly convince the people of Ujiper Canada that 
 Lord Durham was th ; simpleion he would represent. We 
 have indeed frcqurnlly heaixl expressions of astonishment at the 
 extraordinary correctness of the iofornvaliou obtained by h's 
 Lordvli'p and at the intimate knowlcdg^^ of our afiairs which 
 
KKVll'W. 
 
 ^\ u .shall jiiucud tu nolicu 
 
 .Ml 
 
 7 
 
 I lay (J 1- 
 
 •y 
 
 % 
 
 '4. 
 
 ■'1 
 
 tin' Kcjuirl iliS|il;t_\ .^ 
 iiiaii*.s rcrutiilimi. 
 
 'I'lu! finst |)(tiiil «"izc;I upon i.s a.'rtatc'iiKnil in tin.' lv(',(iit tlitit 
 Sir Fraiu'i.s llcail tlisinissc'l tlirec Mxectitive cnniicilhji's to iiiaUu 
 way l")r tlirco new ones. Tliis certainly is an inacctirdci/, hut 
 ono which in no way alll'Ct.s the urgunicnt in tliu iX'|)ort. Pre- 
 vious to Sir F. IJcad's arrival two councilhu's Archdeacon Stra- 
 chan and Chief Justice Robinson iiad withdrawn iVoni tho 
 Uoiincil and their places had ii<jt been filled up when Sir V. 
 Head arriv((l. Now Lord Durliani naturally supposed that the 
 (lovernnient had not been carried on ivitkoul a full council and 
 thus fell into the trilling mistake that Sir Francis l)ad disniiss^'d 
 part of his Council to niaki; way lor the popular nienibcrs whom 
 lie introduced. The allusion to this inaccuracy which even iUr. 
 Ilagermun lias not pretended to be ol' any conscijuence shews 
 the weakness of bis cause. 
 
 The n(!\t charge of inaccuracy in the Report is as to the mo- 
 tives of the late bvxccutivc council for resigning. Mr. Hager- 
 man on this point fulsilies Lord IJurham's argument, endea- 
 vouring to make it appear that bis Lordship stated that the 
 C^Jouncil resigned in consequence of certain appoinlments. — 
 Now Lord Durham's own language is : — " Sir Francis desired 
 " them to make a formal representation to him on the subject ; 
 *' they did so and this produced such a reply from him, as hft 
 " them no choice hut to resign." Tho origin of the dispute be- 
 tween the Council and Sir Francis is given most accurately iu 
 the " Rc[)ort," viz : " the new Council finding that their opini- 
 "on was never asked on these or other matters remonstrated,'' 
 &c. As to the accuracy of tho statement that the obnoxious 
 appointments by Sir Francis Head (Capt. Simcoc Macaulay and 
 Col. Van Koughnet, whicli are those alluded to in the Report) 
 were made (fter the appointment of the Council instead of si- 
 viultancoushi, it is a matter of no moment. The appointments 
 were obnoxious to the AssemLly, and they were disapproved of 
 by the Council, and there cannot be a doubt that they materially 
 assisted in causing the rupture. Lord Durham's account of the 
 Council difficulty is, we assert, substantially correct 
 
 The next inaccuracy charged is that relating to Mr. Hepburn's 
 case. We aie of course ignorant of the source whence Lord 
 Durham got his inlbrmation on this subject, but as the matter 
 was never brought before the public, it must Imve been I'rom 
 some of the parlies interested. Mr. Hagerman denies the truth 
 of his Lordship's statements. "We assert, on the contrary, that 
 Lord Durham's account is true and i\h'. Hagerman's false, and 
 We ch;ilIonge the latter to get I\lr. Hepburne to sustain him. — 
 Rumour tells strange talcs of the indignation justly felt by 
 Ww Hepburne at INL". Hagerman presuming to deny the truth 
 of his case without sending for him to give information. 
 
 The next point seized upon by Mr. Hagerman, and really 
 with a gravity that would lead one to suppo.'^e that he believed 
 it of imporlance, is Lord Durham's allusion to the law pre- 
 vjiiiiug American citizens from holding land in the pro^•incc. 
 
 A 
 
A ui;ui:\v. 
 
 liord l)iir[i;iiii's ulifcct wtis to pfuvo fliut fi'? Airii ncans wvn^ 
 lorbiiltitMi to liokl land '• it is dlllie more coiiscijiitiici' tli.il llio 
 country should h'-inruh.- ns attyarlivc (is possible to ihe emigrat- 
 ing midiilo cla.^-<(•s ol'CIroat llriluin." lias IMr. Ilagormaii at- 
 fom|)ti(i to dispute tlio soimfliicss cA' liis JiOrrisliip's arguments/ 
 No! but wirli a pnerility, uttoiiy unbecoming in a statesman, 
 lio sci/es upon tbe very slight ifiaccuracy ol' bis liOrdship 
 "that a law had been passed immediately al'tcr the late war 
 forbidding AiiKM'iciui citi/cns to bold land/' Wliil.st we admit 
 the inaccuracy wo shall prove his JiOrdship to hav(^ been .sw//>- 
 Htiintially correct in bis statement. It is well Known that under 
 proclanialions iVoni (rovernors Simcoc auit (tore, Ainericans 
 were invited into this Province after its lirst setdcinent, and 
 that it is owing to the nxertions of these enter()ri:siiig men, that 
 rho present emigrants arc indebted for tlie great improvement 
 of tiic country. I'revlous to tbo time uliuded to by Jjord Dur- 
 ban!, the law, which Mr. Uagermaii infoi-ms u^, iiad always 
 existed, " preventing tbreigncrs from holding land, uidess na- 
 turalised," was virtually a dead letter, l-'oreigners bougiil 
 and sold land in the province at pleasure, and wiijiout obstruc- 
 tion. After the late v.-ar, however, at the timi' lliat Lord Dur- 
 ham thought that a bill had been passed, doubts were raised by 
 Ibc Family Compact Parly in the province as to liie right of 
 these persons to flieir lands and other privileges nhtiotigji tiiey 
 bad settled in the province on the faith of lloyal proclamation. 
 We need not enter into a history of iho long contest w hicli fol- 
 lowed on the subject of the *' Alioii IJill,'" in whicli Chief .hisl ice 
 Robinson soem'ncntly distinguished himself A bill was finally 
 j)assed in 1828, confirming to those American citizens, then in 
 the province, their titles to property, and all (ither rights and 
 privileges. To all new emigrants from the United States, the 
 law against aliens lias since remained in full force. It wdl 
 clearly appear from the above remarks that Lord Durham's 
 inaccuracy was only to this extent, — that he mistook the revival 
 or enforcement of a law, heretofore a dead letter, for a new en- 
 actment, a most natural mistake for hisLoidship to fall into, but 
 one of not the slightest consequence to his argument. 
 
 It would be unprofitable on this occasion to discuss whether 
 Lord Durham's doubts of the policy of excluding American citi- 
 zens from the province are well-founded. We cannot, liowcver, 
 forbear to notice that but a very short time has elapsed since 
 .some of the members of the very Select Committee whoso re- 
 port is under consideration, were strenuous advocates for their 
 admission. The encouragement of emigration from all quar- 
 ters seems to be lield by the Governments of all new countries, 
 to be the soundest policy, and it is paying but a poor compli- 
 ment to our system of government, that while our neighbours 
 encourage emigrants from all countries to settle on their lands 
 without any fear of their institutions being overturned, \v(; 
 lire obliged to restrict ourselves to a class of emigrants 
 whose prejudices will, we imagine, prevent Iheui from being 
 (h- Mtrfli d. (t i,.-, hoW("-\er. nil (^)<;re'Mriu-. ei'/:>; to suppONW tha? 
 
h(in<; 
 
 ui':\ji':\v w 
 
 \.]h: Atncni'.an |ni|iu|;iti<iii nrc iimn! di-^siitislkd witli irrrsjhtn- 
 siblc J''(Hui/ii ComjKirf ^oi'cnuiicnt, lluui lliu bollitirsul" lirilisli 
 uiul Irish origin. It lius Ixh.ii a very convenient wutclnvoril, 
 iid c!i|)taii(liini vulgus, lliattli(; lltjlornicrs arv (li.'siro'^s i)l"inlfu- 
 <liicing Ui'i)ublican InslituUuns and cflifting soparatijii, — Mnii- 
 grants of recent date are tooiipt tobi; deceived by liK'asscrti(iii.>i 
 of die '* Com[»aet ' and are frequently induce*.! to lend their liil 
 to sustain an oligarchy who are in reahty their bitterest ene- 
 mies. After a f(;w years residence in the country they begin 
 tv) understand its |)ohties, and to quote tlie words of Lord Dur- 
 ham '* none are more hostile to tlicni (the Family CoiiiiJaet^^ 
 than the greater part o[' that large and S|)iritcd Ihitish horn 
 popidation A:c." Were tiie princi|)le of the British Constitution 
 iairly acted upon in the government of L'pi^er Canada, not only 
 would there be n« serious political disconti-ut, but we (irndy be- 
 lieve that so far from there being a necessity to exclude Amerieai: 
 emigrants, onj)olitical grounds, to our Rcrious loss in a com- 
 mercial [)oint of view, it would o'! impossible to prevail on any 
 considerable portion of the people, unrfer any circumstances, to 
 withdraw themsches from the proteciioH of the greatest nation 
 in th(! world. We are, howevei", wamk'ring from our subjeel. 
 Ijord J)urham's ai'gumunt is not that foreign enn'gra'lu'M sljouhl 
 bo encouraged, but that while it isexcluded, the country s'hoidd 
 be made ^/* atlr<u,l i re ua possible iu llritish emigrants. 1 low- 
 can the British Immigrant read this sentiment of His Jiurdsliip, 
 without feeling indignant at his slanderer Mr llagerman, win* 
 declared a iow days sinc(j, in his place in the House of Assem- 
 i>ly, that he solemnly believed that the object of Lord J)urhaut 
 was to divert British emigration to the I'niled States { 
 
 On the subject entitled *' Policy towards the Catholics,'" Mr. 
 llagerman asserts that none are more fully aware than the (Ca- 
 tholics themselves that "no invidious pdlkjy" iias been acted 
 4q)on towards them. Now what v.-jll the public tIn'nU of iMr. 
 IJagerman when they l(;arn that he had documents in his pos- 
 session, when he penned these words, proving that the Irish 
 Catholics themsclv(;s forced upon Lord Durham's nttentioii, the 
 *' inviilioiis policy'' exercised toward.-; them. IV'r. llagerm.ni 
 would represent Lord Durham as endeavouring lo " fiiiuent dis- 
 i-;ensi()ns" by referring to the existence of Orange'isjn, allhough 
 he knows perfectly well that this subject was brought before his 
 Lordship, when in Toronto, by Bishop RlcDo-mieil and th(! lea- 
 ding lloman Catholics of the Province, and tliat as IligiiC\)m' 
 niissioner he was bound in duly to attend to the eomi)laiii!. 
 
 'I'he remarks on Lord Uurliam's contrast between L'|>|.ei 
 ( 'anada anil (he I'nited )Slales evince ixwy thing but a disposiliuij 
 l<t place a liberal construction on the motives of his Jiordship. 
 Mis Lordship noticed tlkj contrast between the countries which 
 bas been poitited (Hit by almost every traveller, but he did so 
 with the patriotic view ol removing our disadvantages iiiid en- 
 abling us to vie successfully with our neighi)ours, 1\L'. llager- 
 man will find it hard to convince; iiis readers that because tiic 
 '' nifLd States \\\.u a population ^f I'lfttcn nul'ionr:, Ihcrfffif 
 
 ^^#^i^..^ 
 
10 iii:vii;vv. 
 
 IIk; Slulc of iMicliigan, or llliiiuis. oi- Indiaiia luis advaiitngy^.n 
 superior to us. The iiiiiirnvciuciits iillu(ii(l lo, are carried on 
 by cacli Stale independently on iti own credit, and tlie money 
 irf obtained in l<]ngland, where our debentures cannot be sold. — 
 The unlKiud.sonie allusions made by Mr. Uagermaii arc but a 
 poor return for JiOrd Durham's generous cllbrts to promote our 
 pitblic impr- vcmcnt». l*^|ually unhandsome is the allusion to 
 ib(! recomn^endation cA' New York as a port ol" entry. It is 
 >VelI known that tl«' Hon-. W. Allan, and the Hon. II. Sullivan, 
 and wc believe Mr. llagcrn^Jin him.self, joim.'d nearly all the 
 principal merchants of this city in recommending this project. 
 It was brought under Lord Darhnm-'s* notice and he is now cen- 
 .surcd for recommending, what all parties, Tories as well as Re- 
 formers concurred in demanding. Mr. Ilagcrman assumes that 
 the e/Tect of this arrangement would be to prevent our public 
 works being supported. Such would not be the case. The St. 
 Lawrence would still he the outlet for all heavy goods, and we 
 t^)lould only obtain those connnodities via New York, suited for 
 the Spring trade, and which would arrive six weeks sooner by 
 this route. The matter is only mentioned incidentally by liord 
 Durham, no argument in favour of his measures is founded on 
 if, anif he had reason to suppose that in bringing it under the 
 consideration of her Majesty's Government, he was com[)lying 
 with the wishes of the very party who now basely endeavor to 
 found on it an accusation against bin). Mow Mr. Hagerman 
 ciould deliberately make the assertion that the project v/ould not 
 ** receive, coinitciinvce frohi any quarter' after an expression 
 (rnm the lioard of Trade of Toronto, from a public meeting 
 <if the inhabitants at which were two, if not more, of the pre- 
 sent I'.xcculivc Council, and which expression has never been 
 publicly recalled, we are at a loss to imagine. 
 
 Lord Durham's allusion to the "carelessness and profusion'' 
 wliich marked the cxnenditurc on the public works, has given 
 great oflence to Mr. Ilagrvman and his friends, and has been 
 indignantly repelled as a " most unmerited and ungenei'ous 
 insinuation.'' VVc cannot be surprised at this. One of the ve- 
 ry cases alluded to liy Lord Durham was, doubtless, that of Mr. 
 \V. H. Robinson, one of ISlr. Dagerman's select committee on 
 the Report. This gentleman was a Commissioner for expend- 
 ing a large sum of money, say .CT.oOO. on the W'eHand ('anal. 
 His services were not i^ralnitcns, as Mr. Hagerman insinuates. 
 No proper account ot' the money was ever remlercd. The 
 vmiehors were scandalous, in tact eiitirely inadmissible. Crosses 
 without witnesses were produced as receipts for money. In 
 one case a receipt of a man named Shore (a cross without a 
 witness; was altererl I'roin i."** 10s. to £l>^ 10s. although the 
 order for the money was (ov XS lOs. and the entry i.i the Se- 
 cretary's book .iJ-^ 10s. Ciodit was taken on fiiis voucher, al- 
 tered as it was. for £l^ 10s. and tlic \uatter sli/i rcnuiiii.': nn- 
 (xphtincil. The report of a select crinmiittec of the House of 
 Asseml)|y. >igned liv -i\ n.( niiuTs of liie pirsciil HoU'". diar- 
 ires Mr. Ri.'l>in^"n wiihl^einfr 'hti, irul alviif X'^'CO in liir- h<- 
 
 I 
 
ricil orv 
 
 moiit'y 
 
 sold.— 
 
 c l)iit a 
 
 lotu Olll' 
 ision to 
 '. It is 
 iillivaii, 
 ' all the 
 
 project, 
 ow ccn- 
 1 as Rc- 
 mcs that 
 • public 
 
 The St. 
 
 and we 
 Liitcd for 
 oner by 
 by liOrd 
 i/ided oil 
 uler the 
 implying 
 Icavor to 
 a germ an 
 ,-oukl not 
 qircssion 
 meeting 
 the pn- 
 
 ver been 
 
 ro fusion'' 
 las given 
 has been 
 generous 
 jf the vc- 
 at of Mr. 
 mil tec on 
 expend- 
 1(1 Canal, 
 isinuales. 
 The 
 
 h^oy. I n 
 without a 
 lough the 
 n the ^'c- 
 iich.T, al- 
 iiitiiiis un- 
 lliiuse ot' 
 li^M. char- 
 
 M 
 
 KENIKW. 11 
 
 ■■■:miit, whii'ii was pi^incipally coiniKj.si.:.! >.f items fur ;vlnch he 
 liail IciLcn credit (wiff orrr. 'J'hesame rc|)ort charges Mr. Ito- 
 !)inson " trilh i;rc:tt (Icrc/iction of ilaly.'' Mr. Robinson and 
 his fricucls would have iWim] it more ibr tlio benefit of Irs cha- 
 racter, if they had periniltcd Lord Durham's remarks on this 
 subject to pass unnoticed. 
 
 ll is unnecessary to alhit'o to the subject of the disposal of 
 the political prisoners. This matter has been already amply 
 discussed, but wo positively deny the truth of Mr. Ilagcrnian's 
 statement, that the eonununity loudly demanded more nume- 
 r)us examples than those thfit were made. ^So far was this 
 from being the caso that the petitions in favour of Loinit are 
 Matthews were signed by great numbers even of the Tory 
 party. Mr, llagorman feels \ery acutely the allusion of Lord 
 Durham to the exeeuliun of these unfortunate men, fer'which 
 the learned g(;nlleman fetis that he is held by the public to bo 
 priucipally responsible. Exasperated aMhe iu)plied censure on 
 the Upper Canada governnicnt, contained in Lord Durham's re- 
 marks on tin's sLdjject, Mr. Ilagernuin iias been rash enough to 
 deny their truth. Lord Durham asserted that :the.se .unfortunate 
 iiien "engaged a great share of ])ublic sympathy; and that their 
 pardon had been solicited in petitions signed, ll U' gcncrallii ns- 
 scfled, by no levjs tlian iiO,Ot)0 of their countrymen." Mr. 
 llagerinan in reply to this observation, asserts iwailiceJij that 
 " there wore net .">,(I00 .signatures appended to the petitions 
 presented."' UntUi-! assertion we shall make a few remarks. 
 Lord Durham, it wii! be observed, mt;rely stales that " // /v 
 i'cncralh) asserted^" that the petitions were signed by urwards 
 of yO.OiiO i)cr.>ons, in coiilii'ination of which, it is oidy neces- 
 sary to refer to theiievvspapers of the day, and to common re- 
 port never htj'urc contradicted. When we saw Mr. IJagcr- 
 man's report, we commenced enquiries U|)on the sulijecf, and 
 uski'd several parlie.s who had taken an interest in i!ie petitions 
 what the numb:r of signatures was ; the answer of one was 
 10,000, iuid non(> staled less then :iO,()00. ( )ne gentknnan 
 slated, that he had seen a petitifjn measuring ;30 yards long in 
 the possession of John ISell Escp Rarristor at Law, and referred 
 us for further infornnlion to that g.-nllcman, v/ho had, he slid, 
 taken rhargeof all the pi'titions. VVe innnediately called on 
 i\]r. i'ell, and iisked hun if lie recollected the number of signa- 
 tures, :o w hieli he replied, that he thought there were abcait 
 :H,00!», hiif he could not be sure, One petition, he said, mnri- 
 bered ''.•OOO. Another gentleman niformed us, that there were 
 about 10,000 signatures to the petition fn^m the (xoro District. 
 
 Ibil we hnv'^ ('///>/«/ in f(jrmatif)n on the subject. Sir (ier.rge 
 Arthur in hi- desp-iteh to Lord (ilenelg, stat-s \\\\\\v'll kin Hires 
 (Unis jic/ilioiii fruiwiio/ lass lluin ^,000 persons had hern pr.- 
 seated, so that tli- repdi-'. drawn u;> by Mr. Ilagorman eon- 
 tains ixgrtis^^ iiiiss'aih'iKn.l for which there is no e.xciisc, a; its 
 author had e\ery opporiunity i) nsecMtain the truth. S'r Ceo, 
 Arthur's dc^p.-iteh w iil prove to overv dispn'-'sionnle cnrjuirrr 
 .that th;' uiilielunale indi\•idl!al^ alliidi d 'e, " cngagr d a pr' .tT 
 
naiiiiiiii 
 
 12 ur^v[i-:\v. 
 
 shnrn ofpulilii^ f^ympalhy,"' howovor, M maj' suit Mv. Il'agpr- 
 mnn's intiMvst to dniiy it, and tho petitions, no maltor what tlu: 
 (^xact niunhor of signatures may have been, certainly do not 
 disprove its existence. 
 
 Air. Hiigcrman has the assurance to deny that innocent per- 
 sons were thrown into prison, that lieformors were subjected 
 Jo suspicion, tliat the dominant party made use of the rebellion 
 to disable their political opponents. On this point assertion nuxy 
 go .tgainst assertion. Our belief is that Mr. ITagcrman's re- 
 port is false and Lord Durham's strictly true, and with regard 
 to the harrassing proceedings of Magistrates, wo ourselves 
 ftenrd Mr. Htigcnnnn himself, in the discussion on the militia 
 bill, admit and lament these proceedings, and yet after this ad- 
 mission he has the assurance to eall» with affected indignation, 
 «in Lord Durham for proof of the fact. Mr. Hagcrman says, 
 that he does not believe that any person of intelligence and 
 c'laractcr among Reformers will be found to snslahi Lord Dur- 
 ham in the opinions expressed by hirii on this subject, VV^c defy 
 Mr. Tlagerman to get any such Reformer to contradict his 
 liordship, meantime wc shall furnish some evidence in his sup- 
 
 Wo ha-Ve nott before irs the Ketttfn laid before- the British 
 House ofComnwns of the names of the several persons arrcsl- 
 cil in U p|)er (^anada for political olK-nccs, and wc have also an 
 oflicial account of the nwrnhov convicted either by trial or on 
 petition. AVe lind by these documents that 824 persons were 
 ■incsicd, and only 217 convietiul. In the INIidland District l^y 
 persons were arrested. The Bills against 2.'3 were ignoredhy 
 iIk! Grand .lury, •? wore tried and acquitted, — the remaindei 
 wore discharged by the magistrates or Law Oflieers. Wc 
 give those facts in support of Lord Durham's a!~scrtion without 
 nny comment, for none is required. Mr. Ilagorman will re- 
 quire all his brazen cflVontcry to sustain him under Oh:; exposure 
 Alihoughthe number ndfUitird by the government to have been 
 urrf^stcd say 824 bears a very large proportiim to the number 
 '■(ii)victcd, 217 ; yet the n\nnhcv ac/unlhj arrested was much 
 larger. The return to the Mouse of Commons is fa/se, as wo 
 are ready to prove. Wo have not had the document 24 hours 
 in our possession, and we have very limited moans of testing 
 its accuracy ; yet wc can mention the names of 3 persons all of 
 high respectability, which arc omitted. They are J. H. I'rice, 
 FiSq. So'icitor of this city; Rev. Geo. Barclay, an Elder of the 
 I'.aptist church, and a large freeholdct in Pickering; Wr. John 
 Coiner, one of the most respeclablc freeholders in the Comity of 
 Vork. The return to the House of Commons was on motion 
 of i\fr. niimc, and we hope that gentleman will notice that it is 
 n false one. What stop the government at hotnc will take un- 
 der such rirctUTistaneos we know not. 
 
 Mr. Ilageiniaii next adverts to the remarks in the Report on 
 the .'uiitiinislr.'ition of Jiixiico In T'liper Caiiadn, more partini- 
 larly Hi;-, expression «' tliore is still some in!( grity in .Juries *' 
 ♦'which efiuivocal forms are, " savs Mr. Ilagerman, "as of- 
 
 
% 
 
 ll'agrr- 
 tlml IIk: 
 do not 
 
 tent pcr- 
 lubjcctcd 
 rebellion 
 tion may 
 itin's rc- 
 h rogfiid 
 )urselvcs 
 e militin 
 r this iul- 
 ignation, 
 lan snys, 
 cnco aiul 
 ,on] Diir- 
 VVc defy 
 aflict his 
 1 iiis su}>- 
 
 1 r.nlisl! 
 IS arrcsl- 
 3 also an 
 ial or on 
 ^ons worn 
 istrict 7r> 
 '^norctl l)y 
 emaindor 
 rs. VVc 
 n without 
 1 will ro- 
 cxposnrc 
 lavc been 
 c! number 
 as much 
 sr, as wn 
 24 hours 
 )r testing 
 ;nns all ol' 
 H. I'rioe, 
 or of tho 
 Mr. John 
 County of 
 on motion 
 n that it is 
 
 1 liiK-e ini- 
 
 Repoit on 
 
 2 iiartii-n- 
 II Junes 
 
 y, "a^ of- 
 
 I 
 
 n 
 
 JiKVlliW. IM 
 
 ftMi-ive as ihny arr- unjust." Wi; woulii ask Mr. lin<jf.'rmaM, 
 ulii l!i(M' our juricy at itie polilieal trials were not pucLcd ? 
 Was not the course adopted here which the government would 
 not venture to pursue in Lower Canada, of selecting juries 
 from one political party ? Do not the prisoners and thoir 
 friends assert that they did not get fair jjlay ? Did not Mr. 
 Ilagerman himself as Attorney General, vhaUcvgt '\avorfi who 
 were known to have been favourable to acqui'.tal on previous 
 trials, and tlii.s although the entire jury list had been carefidly 
 selected by the Shcrili" from one political party? VVhen these 
 questions are answered satisfactorily Mr. Ilagerman may talk 
 of the purity of the administration of justice in Upper Canada. 
 Mr. Ilagerman denies the assertion of the Rcpoft, that " the 
 late elections were carried by the unscrupulous exercise of the 
 influence of the government, and a display of violence on the 
 jjartoftho tories, &c."' Mr. Ilagerman knows that the instruc- 
 tions of Lords Glenclg and Goderich regarding Executive 
 interference at the elections were disobeyed by Sir F. Head. 
 I le knows lliat there teas violence, and if he can oiler no better 
 refutation of Lord Durham's statements tlian tho report of tho 
 committee on Dr. Duncornbe's petition, he will fail to carry con- 
 viction to the mind of any impartial person. With regard to 
 violence, we shall quote one case which prima facie would bear 
 out Lord Durham's report. An election took place for the 
 county of Leeds, held we believe at IJeverly, — two Consorva- 
 iives were returned by violence, as was alleged by their op- 
 piinents, and confirmed by a Grenvillc committee of the House 
 of Assembly. Another election \Vas held, and again the Con- 
 servatives were returned, and again did a Grenvillc committee 
 unseat them on tho ground of violence. A bill was passed to 
 bnvo f(Mir |)olling places for the next election, which being 
 hold, //ir R'i'or?n candidates were relumed bijtt large majorilii, 
 and tliore was no comi)laint of foul play on either side. 'J'his 
 was only a Cow weeks before the general election in 18:^0, and 
 tif/er the A.'-^-iombly-s quarrel with Sir F. IJeod. When tho 
 i^.Mieral election was held, the polling place was again fixed at 
 Heverly, and a violent political partizan appomted returning 
 oHicer ; and again were the Conservatives returned under pro- 
 frsl on account of violence. These facts came under the notice 
 of Lord Durham and they cannot be controverted. A majority 
 of iho freeholders of Leeds were in favour of Messrs. Buell and 
 Howard at the last election, notwithstanding which the conser- 
 %ative candiilatcs were returned. We give no Opinion our- 
 selves on this matter because we personally know nothing about 
 it, — we state facts which arc bcforj the world. Again, was 
 ihcie not violence in tliecounty Simcoe ? Did not the Reform 
 candidate, tin? unfortnnafo Samuel Lount, relire under protest. 
 IVom the hustings, owing to violence ? Mr. Ilagerman knows 
 that he did, and that his friends would inf<~,. n him that the out- 
 rages couHuilted on him at that election were tho main cau.sc 
 of his b; ing induced to take the step which ho did. Those who 
 l)ave studied tlio human rharart.-M" will bo able to judge, liow far 
 
14 lUaiKW. 
 
 such nn outrngo won!.} be likely U> inllaouco r. man to 'resort 
 v.vcn to il(;s|)cruto find unconstitutiunnl iv medics. ' ' 
 
 On tlu; cliargo agMinist^Lard J)iirl!;<ni dl" ciideavoiirini^ to dis- 
 parago and bnng discredit on the i!ir;mbci-s of tiio House of 
 Assembly \vc must say a lew words. His Lordship h^xs stntod 
 -that certain members arc " accused of violating their ^ pledges 
 at th? elections," of " showkig « disposition to acton cerlain 
 questions as for instance tho Clergy Ueserves, in direct defiance 
 of the known sentiments of a vast niaji»iity of their constitu- 
 ents,''— 'that "many of them came forward and were elected 
 ns being really Reformers who would sup|inrt Sir Francis Head 
 in those economical reforms which Ihe country desired.'' As 
 an instance of members violating pledges v/c need j,m,t go fur- 
 ther than Col. Chisholm, one of tlie iriembers of the committee 
 of censure on Lord Durham, and reprcscutativo for the county of 
 Halton. This gentleman not only voted in a former Parlia- 
 ment in favour of appropriating the Clergy Ueserves to educa- 
 tion, but pledged himsif to continue to do so previous to his la&t 
 (dection. Ho liowever violated lu-i pledge and on one occasion 
 al least, during the last scss-ion, threw out this inef.sure by his 
 vote. 
 
 We positively assert that the recent settlement of the Clergy 
 lleservc question is in ^^ direct drjiaiirc'' "(A' tlu; wishes of llio 
 ))co[)le of the province, who have by their representatives in four 
 successive ParHamenls insisted on the ap|)lication of these Re- 
 serves to the General Education of the people, 
 
 \\c shall now prove by the following (wiracts from the olec- 
 lion addresses of Sir Francis Head himself that the members ol" 
 the present House of Assembly were elected r^s Reformers. 
 
 ••It is witlj {rreat satisra<'tioii I havo obsorvcil Kubscriljeil to tlie ad- 
 flrcKs wliii'h I liavfi just received from the 'rcunsliip ol" I'ickerinff, tlio 
 names of 40 iiitlividuals who are known lo ]ii)ve /xun. violent, lirj'orntrr.-'." 
 
 " I will use all my iulhieuce with Jlcr M.'ijpsfy's yovoninipiit to make 
 Kurh alterations in tlie Land'Grr.ntinjj Department, as shall attract to 
 Upper Canada the redundant wealtli and .noj/uktitn of the inolJier 
 country." 
 
 '' I liavo been commanded by Her Majesty tonf^r cvMy rnde:ivo\ir Id 
 corroct the real grievances and to promote t'le interests ef this noble 
 I'rovince." 
 
 " \ iifled hardly assure you that I am myselfan advocate for Reform." 
 
 '• Tiipy (my instructions) desire me to correct without partiality l/ir 
 g»/«?-rt(/ft.s- of this country : and it is because the a{>ilators see J am 
 ddennincd. lodo so, that they are endeavoring to obstruct me by every 
 tirlilico in their power." 
 
 " I was sent here by her Majesty on purpose to correct the grievances 
 of tlie country." 
 " It is quite certain tiiat I can render this Province poinifn! (i.tsia'tnin.' 
 
 We need not continue our e.vtracts. Enoiijrli has been said to con- 
 firm the truth of Lord Durham's assertion t!;;t„ Ihe protigcr-; of i^r V. 
 Heal were elected as {{fforinrrs, and on a distinct understandin;,' thnt 
 '>they would endeavour to settle tlie Clergy Reserve and other proniltuvJ 
 questions to tlie satisfaction of the peo|)le. It is not surprising liowever 
 that persons who could stoop to deceive their constituents, tnid obtain 
 "seats in Parliament under false pretences, should be very sonsitivc at iiii 
 r\posuro of their conduct. 
 
 \Vq rather suspect iVIr. Hagerman has made an unfortunate 
 *ij3.pcal lo the farai.vrs of Upper Canada '.vhen he ca!!>.. on them 
 
 % 
 « 
 
 .--S 
 
) icsorl 
 - 1 
 
 g to (lis- 
 le use of 
 IS stn*.>-'(i 
 
 ■ pleitgcs 
 1 corhiiti 
 (.lc/iaiic(! 
 constitii- 
 ' elected 
 cis f irjul 
 il/' As 
 , go fiir- 
 Miimittco 
 loiintvof 
 
 ■ Parlia- 
 o cduca- 
 D his labt 
 occasion 
 c by Ills 
 
 c Clergy 
 )3 of liio 
 s in four 
 hcpc llc- 
 
 tlie elec- 
 inbcrs of 
 mrrs. 
 o tlie ad- 
 criiifr, tlio 
 for III m--'' 
 i to iiiakn 
 iiltrai't to 
 G inollior 
 
 o;ivo\ir lo 
 Iiiw jioblu 
 
 Ilefomi." 
 
 rliality l/ir 
 
 t;co 1 mil 
 
 1)V every 
 
 l^ricvniu'cs 
 
 ^•^•/^■'«?l('^.' 
 id to coil- 
 
 oi" t^r y. 
 
 d\n<r tlinf, 
 |M-omu\f ^t 
 IT liowpvcr 
 lid ohinin 
 ilivc tit nil 
 
 rortllliatf 
 (111 them 
 
 liKVlHW. ^ 15 
 
 Jo read Lord l)i;rjiain s •• i!(gra»Iiiig account" oftlicir condition 
 and asks tiicni \vli(.:tlier llicy would led safe " In entrusting 
 '• their I'uluro iiolilical late to the dogmas of such a man," — 
 The people of L'ppnr Canada know too well that Lord Durham's 
 account is .subslantially true ; they know that property in this 
 I'rovince is depreciated almost to nothing, that every branch of 
 business is languishing, that t!i(! I'rovinco has been compared 
 to a "girdled tree/' " a land of pestilence and fam'ne,'' by 
 Mr. Ilagerman's favori!(! Sir Francis Head. Nay,- even one of 
 the members of the select conmiittec ('Col. Prince) declared 
 • inly a few days since in the House, that had he settled in Mi- 
 chigan instead of Canada, his children woukl have blessed him 
 for the act. Will then llie Farmers of Upper Canada join Mr. 
 Ifagcvman in his unciualified abuse of the generous and patrio- 
 tic nobleman who has honestly described their miserable condi- 
 tion to hor IMajesty's Government for the purpose of cflecting 
 an improvement in it? Will they, having tasted the bitter 
 fruit of family compact government, and having Ixicn ruuied 
 by it, refuse fo moLe a trial of the remedies pointed out by 
 Ijord Durham '* Most assuredly not. It is unnecessary to do 
 nxjre than allude to the base calumny on Lord Durham repre- 
 senting him as desirous of diverting emigration from oursliores 
 and directing it to those of the neighbouring Republic. Is tfiis 
 the "eward lor llu; gigantic scliemes for promoting emigration 
 and public improvement lowhii^-h his Lordship devoted i^o much 
 of his lime 1 Surely Mr. ILigerman has overshot his mark. 
 I'iVen his own party w jll not bear him out in tii's most unjustifi- 
 able attack. 
 
 It will seem strange that Mr. Ilagcrman has not ventured to 
 discuss tlip propositions contained in the Report for the future 
 government of Canada, and which, persons of common under- 
 standing would suppose, wore the very points to which the at- 
 tention of the connuiltee should liavo been principally diroct^^d. 
 It is said, and very properly, that the two points of most impor- 
 tance are " the Legislative Union of the Provinces" and "the 
 Responsibility of the oiTlcers of government to the Legislature." 
 The llrst of these has, it is said, b(jen assented to under certain 
 specified conditions. 'I'hc second, Mr. Hagerman considers 
 inconsistent with tiie dependence of Colonies on the mother 
 country. Hi- how(.:ver does not aUumpt to answer a single ono 
 of Lord Durham's uiiansv/orable argtmients in favour of this 
 long sought for change, and W(j ina\ thcrcl'orc fairly assume 
 that lie felt hiins'df uii<M|iial lo the task. 
 
 ..xi". Ilagerinan winds u]) his report in rather an extraordina- 
 ry manner, declaring the conviction of the committee that 
 some great change is about to take place in the system of gov- 
 rrnmcat in the Canadas, hut " they do not believe that it will 
 " involve any departure from llie principle^s of the I»ritish con- 
 " siitution so far as tin y can be made applicable to a colony." 
 Now Lord l^uiliam roeomineiKl^ no departure from tlie prinei- 
 I'lcs of the Jiiitish roustilulioii, neither have the Kefoni'ers of 
 this Province asked am', — Injih on the contrary have urged 
 
ir, lii'.VlKW. 
 
 tlioir npiilicaliun. Mr. llageiruaii evidently iintlurs lands 
 
 very litilo about ilic working of tlio Britisli constitution. Ho 
 has lived all his lilb under tlio despotism of an Oligarchy, and 
 ho hates and fears the people. Lord JKirluun we are gralified 
 to lind advocates principles more suited to this enlightened age. 
 Though iMr. Hagcrinan has not ventured If) enter U|)on the dis- 
 cussion of the main question, Responsible Government, he de- 
 clares that the House of Assembly has pronounced such res- 
 ponsibility inconsistent witk Colonial dependence. NVe shall 
 make a ['i^w short extracts on this subject from Lord Durham's 
 Report : — 
 
 ■ " I mhnit that \\w systom which I propose woiikl, in fiict. pl.ico fho inter' 
 nut govorntneiit of the Colony in tlii; hands of the Colonists l/icnisiircs ; »fc 
 thai WL- sihoiilil tliiis leave to them the eX''i"Ution of the laws, of u Inch we 
 have lon^ entrusted the making solely to them." Again, 
 
 " Tlic constitution of ihe form of (jovernment, — the rcguhilion of foreign 
 relations, and of trade with the mother country, tlic other IJritish colonies, 
 &, foreign nations, — and the disjjosal of the pnlilic lands, are the unli/ jwintH 
 on which i\w mothi^r country rctjuires a codtroul." 
 
 " Nor can 1 conceive that any peoph' or any consideiahle poilion of ;i peo- 
 ple will view with iliisatisfaction a change jfA/'ch iruiild mnovnt siviply tii 
 this, that the! Crown would henceforth consult the wishes of llie people in 
 the choice of its servants." 
 
 It is nut however our intention to cntt;r into a discussion of 
 this question in the absence of any attempt to rebut the unan- 
 swerable arguments contained in the " Ucpovt." We lilt con- 
 vinced that the eflbrts of the Compact would be directiul to 
 throw discredit on the statements of his Lordshi|) with a view 
 to damage his political character. Their report is however a 
 complelw failure. There is hardly even a inaccuracy to be found 
 m his Lordship's statements, and certainly none which in the 
 slightest degree bears upon the main question. 
 
 VV'o cannot conclude these remarks without earnestly im- 
 ploring people at a distance, more especially the members of 
 the Lnixnial Parliament and her iMajesty's government, not to 
 give credence to the misrepresentations of a party, who though 
 in tem[)orary ascendancy, do not in any way represent the 
 sentiments of the people of Upper Canada. We trust it will be 
 borne in mind, that the present members of the Assembly were 
 in some cases elected by violence, and in all, by the unscru[)U- 
 lous exercise of government inHuencc. If Her Majesty's g(jv^ 
 ernment be not convinced by the unanswerable arguments uf 
 Lord Durham, supported by the Nova Seofian delegates, b}' 
 the a))probation of the Canailian press ; and by the; result of the 
 Filcctiuns for CJrcnville & York riding, let thein take the proper 
 means to asccrtaiti the wishes of the people. liot I hem recal 
 Sir(ieorgc Arthur, and send a firm and impartial gcjvernor in 
 his place, who will sec fair play at the election^'. Let th(i 
 present House of Assembly be dissolved tiiid the sense of the 
 country taken on the propositions recommended by Lord Dur- 
 ham. If they take these steps they will a?certain the real 
 wishes of the people ; but we warn them of the coiise{|ucnccs of 
 believing a document framed by the very party whose iniquit- 
 ous policy and mis-government \n\^ been so faithfiilly f\\-poscd 
 by a truly imintrlial observer. 
 
 m 
 
'M 
 
 m