^ ■ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 5< /. o v^'^^ /. 2(i 1.0 :rU£ 1^ I.I ^^ 1,21; ii ® 1.25 ||U III 1.6 ^ 6" ► V] <^ /^ /. > > om w /A HiotogTdphic Sciences Corporation 33 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 ^ |\ iV \\ '"^ ^' '■V I [ 2 1 be done, with a vlow to remove impivll'oii?, which inirivnrtllMit.uioii;^ in a Pamphlet, entitled, " A S^n'c of the pycfhit Form oJ'Go^ Vi'nimcjit in the Pro-jincc of iljj.'bcc^' may have upon uninformed minds. As judges of One Court in t!uU Colony, Meflrs. Mahane, Dup.n, a;id l\;nct, might confidtr themfcdvj.s in\ '.)!\ed, in a general complaint of en-or and wive-X of rule; of iiiccrtainty ^nd irial-adii!inili:raUon of law, that v/as chanred a'-iunll the di'jtrihntim of juf'u\\ in the Pio\ luce (;f (i)vcbcc. Xwpar- cicular, tlic road \va plain, to meet", and an- fwer, ciiarges upon tiiclr conclud, and en- deavour to failain, v.ith lioaor, the places of trull: they held, hy Jheicin^ a conduct and capacity that merited Ois f.ivor of the Crown, and the confidence of its fuhjedls. In place of this, a very different conduce has been taken by thoie Ilcnorabrj Gentlemen. They appear to tlie puhllc^ and exLCUthe powers of Government, t/u-ee out of th'rty Judges, that compofj the Courts of tlie Colony, I aniplilet, ■/H of Go- V"," may Colonv, ' o I <:[cncral rule ; of of law, 'hntijn of In par- , and an- aiid cn- le places idud and (jf the vliiCi has ntlwincn. I'x it'll tree ot" tij'rty \ of tlie Colony, [ 3 ] Colony, to vilify the complainants, and by an unfair rcprcfcntatiun of the caufcb', an- nihilate the grounds of coniplaint. The ^-^ncral fcope of obfervations by the Honourable Jud^e^, are to repreknt the ll.itc of coiifufion in the C(;lony, from the pub- lihiii:^'; His Majclly's Proclamation in 1763; and to hold up the cLuira^crSf and ccufi's, of that confufiOn, unto the prefent day. A very curfory and inaccuratj fl-^?(f/{'to the channel of the National Treafury, very large fuii.s that had been dherted, by the remitter's agent, to mercantile fpeculations. And hence thofe merchants, debtors of the Crown, deeply saifieArret. ^ffcded by uucxpeded profecutlons, feizure and attachment of effeds, united in clamour againlt the laws and courts of Juilice. His icrchantrovcd the p(titiv)iis and conjpl.iinls of his MajvAs's old fihjeCls. Ami if! thiole (>Vtr..iVatIon^', the Clucfjulliec is h.ld up, as h.iving uled ewrtions oi' a teml'ricv to ni.ikj his Majellv's fuhlcviLS dil- f iti; hed wiili tlie dirpcnfatif.'n t^i jnPuce in the Colony. — And the 1 IcMiorai^ie Gentle- men draw a c^nchij'on^ that /^ //• conduct z?^ "^[iiJ.gcs is jufliRed, and woidd hifcvy that the complaints and invellljjatlon were dlf- approved, and held as nou^;ht ; ccidcnccdhf the removal of Mr. Monk, the Attorney Gencr-il, for the part he had taken in fip- po'ting the merchants he^jre tlie le„;t:luive council, and the invefii[';ation into charge s, that had been made, a^;ainfl: the pad admi- nillration of Juftice in the Colony; although the Iloiiorable judges llate and admit, (which was the fact) that Mr. Monk ap- peared at thofe boards a prhate aihoratc ibr the merchants, ufin^ thufe exertions, as fuch. ' ,4 I * [ 6 ] AiJi, by cxprcls {vnni.i'on of the Governor Gfncral, 111 uii Appendix to tlieJud-esObfervations, documents are puhiiihed, witii intent to ilren-tlien the pjoiure ofliardlliip, they have I'liileiwi, under /.v/V/V aecuLition. — To ihew that t/h-y had aceuied the Attorney General oi" havins^ reHedcd on the deeifions of his Maielly's CouiiclJ, and were not permitted to i;n Ibrward in t/jc/r aeeulation. — To re- prefent theChi^f julliee's eondud,as tendin^^- to kt afloat tlie juiliee of the country, and opprefs them. — To jullify /,6r/> condud, in publicly c/n/yi/ig the principles of deeifions, in the Court of Appeals; and holding out the law to be adminillered in their court, to be diiterent from that which prevailed in the fuperior one ! And, finally, to fhevv that the nc'iv fubjeas had oppofed, what the old had contended ior, by petitions to Parliament ; and tliat tliofe new fubjeds difavowed the dodrines let up in the Court of Appeals. It r 7 ] c C;ovcrnor bfcrvations, intent to ', they iiave — To ihcw ley General ons of his : permitted . — To re- , as tendinir )untry, and ondudt, ill deci lions, <'fig out the art, to be iled in the vv that the ic old had iirhament ; ^owed the p peals. It i ■ ; It would feem, from the pidiirc dra\\'n by the Judges of tlie Common Pleius at C^ebec, that the Province was agitated bv parties and fadions. That merchaiits had fought to defraud the Crown of its dues; and from dilloyalty, were now attempting to overturn the laws and conllitution. 'Jliat thofe three Honorable Judges, the faiil.fitl fervants of the Crown, had been onpreifed for their loyalty, in ftanding forth io feeure the revenue, -And/i/pport the true mcthes of Canadian (iovernment. — That the latent principles of thofe difaffeded fubje^'ls, were fully difcovered in tlie year 1779; an.d would iufinuate, that the Government ow^ht tc\ if it did not, aecord v/itli the opinion of thofe Honorable Judges, to pronounce all the complaints, as arihng frum the exertions of d/jhoncjl iiwA dijhyal i\.\.h]{:-3.^\, nuraired in tlie bofom of adiih-acled Colonv ! The importance of fuch charges upon, or Infinuations againjly the loyalty '/" fuhjeeh, wlio have complained, and fou-iu r'.lief, X weli Sc p. 6 '.-1 ^ "t' 1 ..-.•, (lb. !( I 8 ] well merited the deliberate cojifidcratKjii of the Kin-'s Judi^es, befbrc they were coin - mitt.-d to the ^,ublic.— To lUtribute the m^fkrs of 11 petition in i-^r^, agaliiil the (^Lbec Kill, to partifans of tlie revolted Colonies; and to a^i; ^ that the greatefl part of the committee, appoir.ted to prepare fach petilioii, A/./ openly joined the ra)cls In 1775, were f^icJrs of delenee the lud'jcs of the Common Pleas have /<:'/. jAv/, to /hew the "/#0' "^if charges' againlt their capacity, to adminifler juflice to his Majelly's fuhjeas in the Province of Qncbec *. If- * Itisfl.itcJ, " that upon the ni-nval and publication of the Quebec Aa, 5n that colony, tl;e Protcdant Icttlcrs in it I;aJ meetings, nnJ confulteJ about petitions for the repeal or " amr.uhK'nt of the art. Tliat Committees wore appoimed tv> " draw up Petitions to the Kir.a, and to each Houlc of Par- " 1; uncut, prajing for a repeal or iwiaidment of the Qu-bet " Ad." 'i^hofc Petitioners may, indeed, have oflrnded the Honori-ble Judges of the Conunon Pleas, by complaints uled in th- pe- titions : " That tlie Ids of the ilahfas Corpns ht\, and the pri- vilfjje of Trial by Junes, were their 07ily lecuritr apainft the w«.';u7v c/^;c-;rr.v/.-7w,^f.''J3utthofe complaints will be feen to have been -aifeJ, rather by th^ petitioners'/v»v, than ihitcd as c/.w^cj ihatihouid have drawn down the rcfjntmcnt of tlie Ilonorable ifidcratKjii of were coin - t tribute the agaiiiil the h_c revolted greateil part xvepare fdLh L" labels In e Jud'jcs of to fliew tlic ciipacitv^ to ^''s fiibje^lfi If- ublicr.tion of the :ttlcr,s in it I;;iJ r th'j repeal or iv appointed ta Houic of Par- of the Qu'.bet [ the Honorable uk'd in th- pc- t\, and the pri- irity againft the Us will be fcen 'V, than ihitcd I'ntincnt of tlie ilonor.'ible [ 9 ] ir tlie old fiibjec^s, refuient In Canada, who had petitioned in the year i;;:;, and continued thofe intreatles with the Crown to the year 1789, to attain the eihblilhment oi a coniHtution, laws, and government, Jlmilar to thole gmnted to tlie neiglibourinir Monorab!.^ Jirlgcs. Ilowfhr fuch/.^rr may have been realized, daiing luc^cn yc::rs cxperienc cf tJic hnvs eilabliihed, or ja:l,ce aJiiiinillcrcd under tliat ad, future enquiry niav explain. s c It IS una.Tllood that Mr. Mafercs, agent of the Petitioners, counTofp^o-' dec!..r.a, " that tholb petitions uvre approved by UrdCcvndcn t^ ^, " and S:r Gr^rge S.!vl/I,:, who received the {avac, and under- ''^'''''^''•ts of " took to prefent them to the refpedivc Iloufes of Parli:une.n." ^u''"^.- Whatever grounds the Honorable Judges may have fior their P- ^3^. " " charge upon the committees of ,774, or howe-. er they may have dc^ iated f cnn candor in tlieir afl^rtion., vet it is hoped the Honourable Judges would not mean to infinuate, nor con- clude that all the other figner. to thoil. petitions were to b. cfS;!"'^ co^Miuered as di^oyal fl^'-jccl., the partifcns of revolting Co:omes. .Neither would the Honorable Judges fairlv argue nor concl.:!:-, that all the (l^ eral committees of ^er! cliants, from the vear 17S3 to 1785. or fuch magiUrates and oiucerscf the Crov 1, who may have con.plaincd a^airul the admm^dration of iutUce in that Colony, at any ti^e during /•ruv.v/r-/v years have been aftuated by fadlious or rebellious niotues; r.or that the merchants of London tradino- to C^nbcc nor thoh- member, of i'a-Hanent, or (crvants of^the Cro-n' |vho may errcu.'o^:/l, ha;e dil'.pp.oved .v/M- of the f^ilem of la^vs and government. .. the :;:.d.s in which thev have been >':)d are admmidercd in that Colony, are either '/^v^.cus, ill- ^ colonies [ 10 ] colonies in America, my^litfa/'rly be accufcd as fa tl ions, or irtfinuated to be cHjhlfcoU'iU from the circumilancc of liavlni?,- made pe- titions to acquire fiich object;;; the Honor- able Judges lliould rather b.ave exculed the errors of their ccndud, in a mifconllrudloii placed upon the King's Proclamation of 1763, and tlie fjveral coniequent a(5is of Government tlvat followed, to tlic year 1774, and the King's hijlrubiions to the Governor, with the C^iebec Bdi in 1775; thnii endea- vored to hold up thofe natural-born fubjedts, as men that aciled from minds d'fpofjd to become the inilrUmcnt^ <:'i rebellion. All the Honorable Judges vs^ill not admit, that an o]v,K)iition tr) the adiriiniflration of Government is an ;/// /.';///.••' 7 mark of diilov- aity*. Nor Ihould e.eiv man in an V^^.%~ Hill * Ti)e Honorable JikI.^^c M,.!.'r':'; ut.s ? w-.cx'o-zx cf v! s Council in 1766, and fingcon nfih.' g;n!iKMi of Qutl)cc. Go- vciTior Murray l.a.l l):\-n r,v:iI'cJ, and f .i--utcr.;i;'t-Gcvcrn>->r Cnrktou fiiccecded to iln; coMiriV-iad. Siicii /.'.v wr.s Mr. M.ibnnc's coiv.i'.Kl, ui oppofition to tl;c L'lcutLr.j.Pt-GovcrrGr, «i!id ^^i\\ ti.c '.i;tion tict lu cni'j..ri,;ca in, or ralfcd arid fup- r.ort;d i 1 be accufcd diJhjfioleJ^ .>■ m;uic pe- ll (J Ilvonor- :xculcd the onllrudloii mution of :nt a(!is of year 1 774, Governor, Iu!U endea- •n ful-jjedt;-;, 'ifpolld to not admit, :1 rat ion of of diiloy- O '-\ f ;■ *T O- O. . 1 i --/ » . t;^ — Hill :v:!;;bcr c.f v!.2 Qut'i)cc. Go- •r.art-Govcrnor /.',"; wr.'j Mr. LUIt-GoVCITGl', ■.'iifcd arid fup- '.-.ort;d [ '■ ] lilh government be concluded as dififfcdled, for djLndin;.;- a Cro\%;i Piof:cution, or com- pLiini;^..;-, when, J}-j^/i d/] 'r •/}, lie flioulJ pre- fiiiiie it a reafo 1 to ijek for relief. Th^ lionorable Judges of tlic Common Pleas, h'vc attempted to give an account of the Li\sS and ^o\ riiinjnt aaininiilercd in the Colony, and have d'fr/cJ, '' That the ^^■'•^^' ** convplaints againil the Court;; of Juilice " did /io/ commence, till after the year " 1775 :" And, even /Zvv/, attribute thofc compLiints to be 7'athcr a?ainft the fvflem of government, and laws cftahl'ijhed by the i^ncbcc yl:h than ac'-ainil the mifconduct and errors of the Judges. \i the hiilory of Canada, from the con- quefl: to the paffing of the Quebec A(fl, ported in the Colony, thr.t tlic L'tuicnant-Govcrnor found the Kint^'s honor ;iiy' intcicvL to require Mr. Mabane bein:^ put out of o!tici', and from amc.^ir the fitlftj of his Majelly's Coiinci', If? wxT hifpcndcd, and t!;L Commander in Chief puSn;'v.d t.) the Colony, in militarv orders that unlefs he ceaf I I'l'S f!c;'i'...is or turbulent diicourfci, he Ihouli be re- moved outof th- ijuniron ! B 2 were sil [ '= 1 were intended as cfjcntid to a defence by the Honorable Judges, tliey have 'iyt;/ impcr- fcStly fatisfied thofe v/ho wiOi to poflefs a knowledge of that Colony. But it was at all times pnfiimcd, that tlie Honorable Judges knew the many complaints againft the adminiftration of Canadian jufllce, and that they CQuU, at leafl, have referred to public documents, that held forth thofe com- plaints, long prior to the period they fix, of the ^icbcc A61', and to which alone they would now have thofe complaints attributed. Thofe public inrtruments will fliew the complai.>ts of fufferings, in the Colony of Quebec, by the adminiflration of juflice^ and hold up the remedies pointed out by the King's fervants, " in the nomination and « commifjion of men, of prfcfional knou'ledge, to toe ofjicc and trujl of adminijtering jif *' tiee^r IS^ofna/I degree of merit has been claimed by thofe Honorable Judges of the Common * See Appcndi.Vj No. I. Pleas, cnce by tlie very hnpcr- poflcfs a t it was at able Judges gainft tbe .', and that 1 to public bofe com- :hey fix, of alone they attributed. \ fliew the Colony of of jufliccj -d out by 'nation and knoii'kdgey Bering jnf^ :n claimed ; Common Pleas, [ 13 ] Picas, " for the hencjlt -.vhich thr.t Court " afforded, (under the hrs:s of Canada,) t7 " General Ualdimand, on behalf of Cio-eerK:nei.\ .| " to recover monies upon orders of his M-i^ " JoV-^ Treafury, expreffed hy letters fror,i " their Secretary:' A brief hiaory of thofe I profecutions has been entercil upon, to I (liew, that the Petitioners of i-H^ were • debtors to the Crow:-:, who clamored I againil the laws and Judges that had /cured ' the King's rights; and ti:..it General ILil- dimand profecuted thofe fuits, and obtained ' thoie benefits, contrary to, or not wiih tlie . opinion or aifi fiance of the ylttorney General. ^'"■''''"" Thefe ohfervations and claims to favor \ were made m Oclober, 1787. But, in December of that year, the Ilciorablj Judges faw thofe law fuits reprobated as illegal by the highLfc authority; and were mortified to perceive the Governor- General, Lord Dorchciler, in the year itSS, called to the liberal and juil: duty of i" ranting- ] rsleafes to the debtors of Mr. Cechrane, Or Mcills. I larky and Driiiiiiiiciid, on a trifling S- p. 8 t'. ir, Ob. lii y^ [ ^4 ] trininc compoution, for the dil^rhargc o£ I thofj debts th-c, after General HJdimand's tidv;/?(i profccutious, were llirown to the a •- count c'f the Crov/n! And the Governor Ci'cncral, in the dilcharge of that duty, at c!l tinny, aivJ Vvitjh all thofc debtors that had bt.-cn ilized, attached, or profecuted, Jiipiudihi^, at the coinpofxtion, for a rcbafi and quit claim lo free and fave General Sir Frederick ILiIdiniand, ajid all who aded under him, not even excepting the Honor- able Judges, from fuits in damage's, that might oihcrvclfe have been laid, by reafon of the illegality of i'dck " ^ucry bcnrjicial " at- tachments, upon vviiich the Honorable Judges gave judgment to a moil enormous amount ! Neither would it be didicult to (hew, that thofe rcLafes operate a quit claim to up- wards o.t cnc hundred thoiifand pounds 1 that iDould have been received by the public, or flood a clear demand upon, and to be accounted for, by the contradors " for J " fuppl)ing M'. >1 t '5 J" ciifchargc of 1 Hildiinand's wn to the a •- the Governor that duty, at debtors that r profccuted, , lor ^ rcLuifi - General Sir 1 wiio acted J the Honor- (image's, that by reafon of 'Hijicial " at- Honorable ail enormous :o Hiew, that laim to up- "^ounds ! that the public, and to be dors " for " fuppl)In!j; " fiipplylng money to pay the troops nnd " other military expences in Canada," if General lialdinvand l\:d Jolh-ivcd the advice and opinions of Mr. Monk, the Attorney General; if he ^/A/advif- the Conn7-ander in Chief not \.Q interfere with the contractois' debtors, and not to attach a:^d feize> as monies of the pi.jlic, debts that L"roli\< were the property of the contradors or their agent, and not of the Crown; and which the Honorable Judges may //ii:' difcover, the laws of Canada did not authorife; nor anv of thofe favorable decrees, on tlic fuits of General Haldimand, that v.'cre profecuted hy the Solicitor GcncraU ^^nd ?vlr. Ci!7)ict'-\ fjr the benefit, but which turned to the infinite injury , of tlie Crown: Profecutidns that, the Honorable Judges may have fre- quently heard, were not made upon the exprefs refolutions and pojiti'-oe orders ci" the Lords of his Majclliv's Treafurv. * " A French lawyer, fccrcUiy and tiar.ilator to tiic " Governor and Cour.cil." If ill [ i6 J If the King';; Miaillers flood inforinccf, aiul believed, that tlie petitions of 1783, to his Alajefly and both Houfes of Parliament, and the <^ c/c-n:ro:ir articles of complaint ngainlt tlic Jud-cs, proceeded fVom dei'raud- ing debtors to the public, a!id dif.iieded riibjclts, to the Crown, who, iVom llich motives, had " calimini.ited " tlie Kind's o Courts it is not to be v/ondered that « cbe " ^^rrcturj f ^tatc Jignijlcd to the Go':::r^ior of tL' Frov}:icc (r;^neral Haldim.nd) a ^Jcry Jlrong di^l}ipproLiUu ,f tbojc pcil^ ^>3, another ^ar follow :;iir. rcuions to riy imiilur to I but it would lat the evik complaijicd [ 17 ] complained of had //j/ been remedied; but Jiad inereafcd *, Certain Petitions, made by many of the Canadian new fubjeds, termed Counter I'etitions, are referred to: but furely the Honorable Judges do lot mean to draw an argument, that tbcir judical procwdwrs, oi* the praaicc of the King's Courts in Canada, arc approved hy thofe Petitions. No document, that we know of, has ap- peared, fandioned by a body of people, or even individuals, that refide in that Colony, or Cireat Britain, who know any thing of the laws, and juftice adminiflered by the King's Courts in the Province of Quebec, to afford the teflimony of approbation. That Inch Counter Petitions Ihould take up the p^dincal GpJuions of the Monorablo Judges for funporting the French Lav/s, ;>?;d in the entire latitude {^ranted bv the Quebec Bill, may without much difficulty be accounted for; \vhcn they are 'I'z^w nro- Scu Appjr.iix, No. HI. ceecjnq: sm Ji^'i;' I [ iS ] cccJiii^ from the Ihimis and exertions of Caiuuli.in liwycrs, and praditioncrs in tlrj Courts of Common Picas, advocates who wii] not l.iy claim to much hno-.vk'tl 'c of the laws of En^dand, propofed to be introduced by tile Chief Jullices bill, as L^roumled upon Ids Majeily's Inllructioiis *. — A brief ac- count of thd cd'/Jl'Sj that led to the inveflic-a- tion Iv.is been ^^iven, by way of introdudioii to the Honorable Judges Remarks, on the oral and written teflimonv; but that ac- count we hold as partial, fallacious, and un- fatisfaclory. The rife of difeord between tlie Courts of Law, is attributed to an opi- nion delivered by the Chief Jufcice, in a cafe of Gray and Grant, and followed by a Bill brought into, and moved in, the le- giflativc Council by the Chief Ji'.iHcej and in which the Honorable Judges complain, that certain preambles to cjiadinp- claufes of the Bill rciiedlcd on the Court of Commoi^ Sec Appendix, No. IV. Pleas, xcrtions of !icr,s in the; acatcs who L-(l 'c of the introclLiccd inulcd upon L hi'vjt' ac- L* invtflic'-a- lUrodiidion l:s, on the t that ac- ts, and Lin- d between to an opi- lice, in a owed by a n, the le- :flicej and compliiin, cdaufos of ' Common Picas, 'I i I 19 ] Picas " That the Icglhilvc Coimcll njcdcd ^^: r -f ** the propof.-d Law, from a co.iviaion that""'"* '* the fiimc, ill place ofh-aHn-divinons and iMc: cnrrerenccs, as propolcd, would perpetuate i^ " dJilenlions, by elhiHi^hhig djcrcut hirs {,,x I " the inhabitants of ihc fu::^ pjovincc." I " That a di'Tcrcnt La\v ^yv/ax tii.it of " tlie Chi^f JnAiccs Pill war; propof,-d, ^ '♦ (and fupported hj f.vo Jud-;s of t^e , *' Court of Con^mon Picas) and n^.:nv ,. " of the old Til^jc^ils having petitioned to *' be heard bcfbre t!ie Lcgi(htlve C'oundl, " againfl the cnading iiich Bill into a Lau', I *' James Monk, his Maj:lly's Attorney Ge. I " J'^ral, 'lihh iKnuiiJion^ of Lis excelhicv tie \ " C^ovcrnrrQ:n:raJ, appeared as the Counf:!, : " and in beh.ilf of the petitioners, on tlie I - i-Uli of A;.-il, 1 787, to o :^r Realbns " againll the liill." A;:d tins il.ort account of the dlllord between the jud-nvmts of ^^''• the inibrior and luperior Court, and rif^ of the invcftigation, is given, to arrcft the j'^dgment, upon any rcprcfentation to be c 2 leen mJ iS of 1 A V ( 20 ) Iccii ill the pamphlet entitled •' A StcUc of *• the prcfcnt Form of Go^ccmwcnt in I be Pro- ** iv'/AV of ^^/i'/nr." W'licn the ludiies of an Kivjlilh Colony iland impeached lor ineap.ieity to admini- iler its laws, or a wilful perveiiion ofjiir- tice, it is a lerious appeal to the executive hranch of the Britiili Conilitution. That appeal has heen longjifice made, and altliough ibo/e Judges have heen fiijf'ei ed to remain on the feats of juflice, and in the dilpen- fation of law, yet it will he hii^;hly necef- lary that a true llate of fo important a con- fideration ihould foon appear. Puhlic do- cuments that have heen referred to in Ap- pendix, No. I. anil thofe Ihited in two pamphlets ■'^ puhliilied with relLrence to this fuhjeLi, mull e\ ince, ;/:;/ what the Ho- nourable Judg-es have allertcd, '* tluit the '* lil, Rc\ic\\ of tiic Cuv. ornmi-nt and Ciiicv.r.icc, ol tlic I'ro- 7.<\, Si:;»c cS t'lo Pii-Unt l'"(irm :ind Govciiiiui'nt of t'ac Province (it"t^iLhi.\-, 17^9. Drriw!. (( cr,"^i/i o [ 21 ] .-/ SUIlc' of in the Pro-' lilli Colony to udinini- lion of Jiir- ic executive ion. Tliat k1 altliough to remain the dilpen- >hlv neccf- rtiint a con- Piihlic do- to in Ap- :d in two :fereiKe to at the IIo- '* thai the nice, oftlic I'ro- % *' onghi nf the comphi'ints bad an fen cni oft ;, " and rejled on^ the ••■jnjlituthm of Ciorernweni f " ejJahiijhed hy the ^^/ehec BiH^' hut tliat tliole eon^plaints were ol aii earher date. \\ the year 177^, the Advocate (General, in his report to his Majeily, ilates, " the " Court of Common Pleas to he filled ivhb -, " !::':! I tai-y men ior Judges, and hriejh " aifejlors *; and now, ha\'ing almoll ny brought before them, *' e-vidently tend, at all times to leffen tlic *' utility and conjequenee of the Supreme *' Court." The priefls were difeontinued ; yet it has been repeatedly quellioned, as impolitic or unjulf, that the penury of CJovernment IhoulJ be offereii as a fuffeieut reafn lor retaining th(^fe military men as Jutlges ; no\v con- lidered to liave ciTedd tlie anarchy aiul dii- trt fs that appear to dillrad the Colony ol ()uebec. c;ri,;ni.'iit ot t'ac « cri'na o * Pcrlon- v(.'ir.'J in tlio F-nus, wl'.o vcport t!';" lame, r.s ap- plicable to [MiUcuIar cafes, lor infornialion ol'llic juJj;i's. 1 iu)le ! '!.: !IH| I 22 ] ThoCc IIoncml)!e Jud-cs, in dclincatJn- the grounds cf the inveftigation, could h.ive ihcv:n that, lahilquent to the Qu. bcc A.l^ the n:crc:unts in London tnidin^o Canada biidly co:nn]aincd to his M.ijcily's Secretary ''^';''-^ ^^i the year i;;S, agdnll: the laws, ii^i-I niode of adniiniilerin- juilJce. That thc.ie ccnipbints .vere rc]X'ated hy petitions '"' ;^^ ^^'^-'" -^^1 I^iillanicnt, in the years i:'33 and 178.;, and were followed in Ca- nada hy cxpreis cliarge., againft tlie difj.en- --:on of juiliee and in terms i\^^ moil ievere, hy committee of merchants, autlio-- rii::d hy the Governor and Council to report on the flate of the commerce in that Colony ^'■•. ^ '^'^ rionorahle Judges could Iiave fl^ucd '^*' ^']^^'^^j"' c?^-^clcu3 hiitru:-;.::, i],,t Lord Dorehe.Lr laid befbre tiie le-iu:uivc Conn„ -'■'V -^f-' hk, aiiival; and upon vl.ici, the Chief Juuicc's Bill ..,„ fc,,,,,. ^^ heal ctivij:: -^-Vi- ^^.ei ^.';L:vv/;av in t!i; * c, Sf? A;^pendi.v, No. V. " Colony," J [ 3 1 HI dclincatinr). j:"i, could h.ivc ■^ Quebec At:!-, ^ing to Canada ^t;/'s Secretary -inll the Ivxs, uilicc. That -i 17 petitions in the yews 'lowed in Ca- ll the difpcn- •i;^ the moil ^^nts, autiio- icil to report i"^s^' in tJiat ^i:ive flatcd •', that Lad -uivc Conn- ; and upon ■'^cas framed, -'tv.; in t!ie «' Colony," by eflabliihing t'uif diil^rcncc of laws, for tiie inhabitants of the /Vav l^rovincc, wliich the Honorable Jud/^es con- tend; that the lei: Illative C aneil, f)!j- Kings f.Tvants) were convinced would f-cr- fctuatc diffciitions; and whicli t!- TCntie- jnen of the robe, who framed or iliiv->orted the counter petitions, inlUkd could nol be luidcrdood, as ant/jcrized by tlie Onebec AlT:, to (him it the Couhcil to pafs any lav,', general OY particular, that had difivrent prin- ciples from that of the French Lav/, or in the view of flivouring any cbfe of People in the Province *. « The Honorable Judges could have flated, the Protell of the Chief Tuflice, and eio-ht Counfellors, upon rejeclicn of the Law pro- pofed, as framed on his PvLijefcy's inidruc- tions, to the laid Council; and, by doin^//t'^ an inquiry into thc» condudt of the King's Judgc\s ? and why then, after they Ihould have attempted to avoid or fhrink from a gc nerval public aecufa- tion, referring to a variety of caules, and endeavrjiir to do away tliofe^-^v/tr^;/ charges by a /^rrj^/d" and />/7r//^// inquiry, as SATISFAC- TORY to the honor of the Crown, and peace of his Majefty's fubjeds, touching the Com- plaint againft the difpenfatjon of Judice* ? And it may be further allied, isjhy thofc Ho- norable Judges, even after th public ^nd general mquiryliad been ordered, fliould wiih, or infift on a right to diredl the inveiHgation ordered by the Governor, " into clhrrges and acciif.itions " again ft the paji of ad niinif ration cf j-jftice ** in the Courts of Common Pleas fir the tivo " dijh'iEls and Court of Appeals,'' to a fubjed. of recrimination by the Honorable Judges againft the Attorney General, not referred to, nor in the cognizance of the Chief Juflice ? See Appendix, No. XT. Whatever i i|i [ 29 ] iiiry into thcj i ? and why Lttcmpted to ublic accula- cauios, and al charges by ;atisfac- v^n, and peace ig: the Com- " Juflicc * ? ^hy thofe Ho- 'c and (fcncral vvilh, or inlifl tion ordered nd acciif.itions tkn of j 11 {lice r for the two ' to a fiibjed, able Judges i:city, and integrity of the K'ufs Judges (jud eouvts in the Pro'-eince f ^J^uebee, to ihlm- nifcr the hires fthdt Colony. It is matter of ll-rious moment, that thofo compViints (b ijiqiiired into f^uid he con- fidere^'; an^l, if iounded, a remedy applied. Tiie executive goven^.ment, the judicial autliority, the intereils of the King*s fub- jedls, may ha\'e long f:cn and experienced, the deplorable llate of that Colony. We liiall not undertake to fw, what may, or what may not be expeaed from i\\ii Kiiig'y MiniftcrP, and tlie parent flate, that behold in a Eritiih Colony, the lerifitive and pell leal ^^qwqv^ of thegoverjimcnt, {^vld'y comp^ed by the King's fjrvant;;) divided into pr.rtie.sand//i7\', the in- ferior judges contending rj6'//.y/ the fuperior*. Thofe * TIic ITonoral-!e Judges would hold cut nn idea, t'iHi llv? Chief Julliccdii'icis fioni the Cuina of Convnoi) V]:w , nf i-rj' ( [ :^o ] Tholo laws of renifily to tlie evil': and coinplaiius iiuroduccd to the IroiQative council by the Clucf fuilicc, as cinhmcin^ the policy and jullicc o/7ms Majejlfs injlrw.:^ this, fubniittcd by the Governor, oppjldhy the Judges of the Common Pleas, und in the divifion of the King's Council, nycacd law prevail-, m tl^e Colony ; and liy \\oU\v.'r ,v, the laws of i:ii-hnd, >;• the i:.:>uralk.-n Jubjcds, Jkis ict lloat all civil rights, and crca-.cd :i-.arc!',y and con.'ufion. L'ut fuclj an aiiiT- tion ifmadc, i, initnic, and th.- ini:n'iation is Dialicious. Tiu.- judgments of the: Court (;f A^^mc;!]^;. all rc.■r^giu.e one general rule of deciiion under and upon the (^ehcc ;;;!!. " i he a>,tl:nt «' lai':s and cufioms ofC.vuuLr that h-'.s been th.e criterion l,v wJiich the judgments of the Comrron Pleas haxe been tried ; a)-,d it is in the bif.;lhknt knowledge o\ thole law.,, the ^iy.'--? ofthe judges, and the errors of their judgment can he confi.l.-icd tohnve appeared. T.he proceedings in, and report of the law roin- nittee by ihe Chief Ju!lice and Judges (,f the Conr-on V\c?a, The rcalbns ai-Ign.^J in th;- J^idgnicnts of t:;e (?oart of Apr^al.s : The repeated anem;>ts to bring under cnn.Iderati .n, and efi fl;ftuatethe King's intli artiele ofJudriiair-n, fuvv l!;- aHfi.dlry oi the Judges oi' tlie ComrK^n i'I.:a-. a;lcr:;ic.n, in th.'ir C'h:;'r\n-. t;ons(page 14) of the opinio-i iidvl a:.d hii.! dow:: aTaw, hy rh.- Chief ju.Hce. And if ever luch a- opi-,i;,n had b.^n cntert.;i led 'n.-. as .aw, It appears Uy\y Jlugulir, tiiat \n ,;, «.vc inJlance has a judgment of a court of Common I'leas be.M examined and decided !)y fu.:h rule; nor any one ji; Igm -nr in appeal been rendered on tlie prcUrned c-i!K;nce ol" tas law of l^nqland piv- vailhig; except whe-> fich lav and rule of decillorr has been Jiitrcduced by Ipecia! ordinance of the legid^ture of Quebec. *' as tiie evil'*, a lid le Irgidative IS cinhrucin^ ''<'Jlys injlruc- ^r, opp fed hy *Jcp.N, and in ncil, rcjcch'd Z \^\> the laws of i-'t .-hloat all civil iiit fiiclj an aiii!'- iiiallcious. Tlio I'iii/.c one general !!• " Ihra>,!i.:,t iv.c criciTion bv -■ been trie! ; a'-,.i , tiic iij/.''-?ort;v :onfi.l:TC'J tolmve ni- th'j law- roii]- ' C();-,i" OP. PLT.q. oart of Apr^.il.s : ciat; .n, and ^'f- uni'Llr- aMa,(i;rv ■i^ a • lau', hv rh.> \y:cn cntcitaiieJ ■ <.' iniiancc has ,-, ovamiced ami in appeal bocii M l^n^IanJ piv- c;lir;n has been ; oJ" Qi'.cbcc. • P- I (( as [ 3- ] " as the means o( pcrpctuatif.'r dilTcntlons /// ** />A/t't'of Av/Z/z/^uivirKjiis and difTcrcnccs." — '■■•"oui.iv, Protcils and projcdcd laws delivered to the puhlic, as approved by nearly one half of the legiflative council, to jullify the _L,n-ounds of proceedings, and endeavor to remedy the evils " of anarchy and animofty, that had " long fuhf'jlcd in the Coijny to it'sdfrracc and " detriment.'' — Petitions, and counter peti- tions, to the King's Reprefentative, from the fliarpened minds of liis xMa jelly's fub- jeds, contending — tlie one, to att.iin what has been conlidered, tlie gracious iiitcntion of the Sovereign, as propofed by the Chief Jujiice. The ether infiilin.g on the ri'^ht to preferve, immutable and entire, tlie laws and fundamental principles of the French jurif- prudence, as iupported by tlie Honorable Judges of the Common Pleas, — The Court of Appeals rcverfmg t'le decrees and judgments oi bothy the courts of Common Pleas — Forty out of forty- fix, that came before it durin'^ Uvo years and a half * ! And in the body ■*■ See Appendix, No. \i'<. I r '»2 1 L .^ ^ J of thelc iu(lj,inL-i\ts dillviTlng tlic rc;if(;ir, and nccrlfiU-i/y holuIn;.r up the errors of x.\w iiikrior Courts*. The Courts of Conuiion Picas publicly d^fivowlfj^ the law and prin- ciples of juflicc, held by the fupcrlor Court f: and the Judges of the Coninion Pleas iittinir even in the Court of Appeals, -.xw^X tliere, con- ienMfig ugaiiill the legal and judicial opinions of the Chief Jullicc§: each Court fteady in * The r.aw, (Oid'iance, :»; (,\'o. JH. c!iap. 4. § 4.) rc- 1,-t quires tJKit thj r f'o;- t!-c }udo;mciit oFtlic Courts of Com- iron PIo;is,a.ul alio ofappca':, fuail l)e ;lated upon the record. f Tlii- has hfcn !naniK'"cJ ii' a very f'inng and important degree, on t)ic \i: [ 37 ] ns. It has 1 the courts 1 itfclf ; and ingc of law, charge has that have, lar will and ce his con- car the ap- t, and pafs ion of " an Lich charac- dc'liroLis to :ir har/li to ■move thofe ^ the want fferent fen- udges, who ;e, avo'wing : next. When the oaths of vvitnefles are held of /;/} weight {with Judges that try the faci arid the /aw) than the word of a friend ; or private letters from an acquaintance: when pafTionand refentment; when friendlhip and regard, can he helieved to turn the balance. in the hands of an Englijh Judge, is it fur- priiing that complaint or refentment iLould follow*. The petitions to parliament have com- plained, that the morals of the people are injuredy by the modes of admin iileringjuflice in the Province of Quebec f . — Under the abfolute government of France, it was not uncommon, privately to folicit the favour of the Judge. — In Canada, where the laws appeared at the pleafure of the Judge, fuch an attempt might be expected; but under %\\ Englijh government, when it fliould have appeared in evidence to have fucceeded, tlie man fo fuccefsfully pradiccd upon, one When See Appendix, No. /\ V . t Appendix, No. III. might I <:i [ 38 ] might reafanably fuppofe, could 117 huger fujiain character, nor office, in the dilpcnili- tion of judice *. In a country where the fubjed; i.s per- mitted to eiHniate the laws, iefs powerful than the will of the Judge, the government is confideredas abfolute in the extreme. Many inilances have been offered, in fhe public examination into the pail adminiftration of juilice, to charge and induce a belief of mai- adminiflration of the laws, in the Province of Quebec, by fcveral Judges of the Courts of Common Pleas. It is depofed, thaty/W; and hnprifmrnetits have attended tliofe who incurred Mr. Judge 7^(3/^'L77/t''j-difpleafure: nor have the witnclfes relied here, they have delineated the grounds of beliefs that he was partial, and that the main fubjed: of the fuit was judged contrary to evidence and laWy to favour or prejudice a fuitor-f*. * Appendix, N"o. X\'f. f See examination of J. P. Archambauld, of Antoine I ' Roque, of Louis Loif;au, and of Joim Baptille Itiibault, ii September 1787. Invefligation papers. The M:^ .M [ 39 ] OH Id 117 iOh'Q-iT 1 the difpcnili- ubjed; is per- icp powerful I government is xtremc. Many in fhe public lininidration of 1 belief of mai- n the Province s of the Courts lofed, that y/W; ded tliofe who iifpleafure: nor ire, they have 'fy that he wa^ )jed: of the fait \ce and Icrui'y to auld, of Antoine J.:' Baptille Itnbault, ii The The dignity and Importance of the Crown, or the loyalty and happinefs of the lubje^^, are ao w lie re m'jyj confpicuoiiily fjcn, or truly confidered, iha?! in the courts and dif- penfation of juftice. It is in the wifdon and due execution of the laws, that the fubjed: values his fi tuation, and is wakeful to expe- rience and praife, the fecurity and comforts of focial life ! much may be expedied from men educated in a fcicnce, and to a poirellion, Wwvthe fearch after truth, the certainty of an inflexible rule; and the dignity refulting from " decorum, are confidered eff'ential, and found at all times attendant on the character and duties of a Judge. — In Canada, fhit ikfcct may, in fomc degree, ferve as an apology for fcencs of confufion, indecency, and fquabling, through the progrefs of a caufe, by tbt yiidgcs, AdvocateSy Attornicsy clerks of the Court: — Party's, ivitnc[j'csy cad by-ihinders'^'. But when added to thefe modes of difpenfing Sec Apncrdl-v, Xo. XVJI. inllice. IE % Sec Exi- mination ot' J. Reid, C!<:rk of the Court of Common Pleas, 2ift September 1787, ■ with parti- cular llate that exhibits 491 taufes heard aiul adjudged in ti^bt day » 1 [ 40 ] jufliice, the fubjcct is called to witnefs i/p- ivards of one hundred caufesy moved, heard, and judged in a few lioiirs of a day: his fears and diftrelles are increafed *. The rapidity Oi" thefe judgments may in- tleed, in fome degree be accounted for; but perceiving the reafon of the fid-, will not leflen the diftrefs. In caufes of default, it appears that no evidence is required of the debt, and as the fummons or mefue procefs is legally ferved, by being left at the dwell- ing houfe, or laft place of the defendant's abode. It has often liappened, that execu- tion is taken out, and levied on a defen- dant's eflatc, ^iviibout an adiual notice of de- mand, or of a fuit, or the evidence of a debt I * In the winter circuit of the year 1786, February 22, at Terrcboune, Mr. Judge Rou^llk lu-arJ and pronouiiccd>./j- mcnts, rules, and orders on one hundred and four caufes. Mr. Judge, Frafer at the fame place, on tlie 1 7th of July the like, in fevcnty-two caufes. Mr. Judge Soutboufi at Chambly, on the 26th of July the like, in fevcnty cauf.^s. And thefe judgments, if for fums under ten pounds, are without appe.-'.I ! no - % i 1 to witnefs up- moved, heard, of a day : his fed*. gments may in- unted for; but fiid-, will not ;s of default, it •cquired of the mefue procefs ft at the dwell- the defendant's ;d, that execu- ;d on a defen- il notice of de- ■lence of a debt! i6, February 22, at md pronouiiccdyWo-- id four caufes. Mr. :h of July the like, \\\ at Chambly, on the ■\nd thefc judgments, appeal ! no [ 41 ] and from many of thefe judgments there is no Appe:d * ! Neither would it f;cm, that under tliolc dirtrefsful modes of dcclarins^r the la'.v, har.ded into coercive execution, are /i/c7j fuiiors and fubjeds legally bcjhrc the Court, alone liable to judgment; for, 'if tiie Court lliould con- fider that '\fubjiautia/ jiijUce" would be ad- miniftered by a tbircl perfon fuffering, that which the defendant was profecuted to an- fwer and pay; the mere circumllances of his not being equally brought iiito fuit, and before the Court, would not prevent a de- mandant from obtaining the effedual objed of his plaint, by a decree and execution * See examination of Artliur Davidfon, Efc|. in Appendix-, No. XVI. a Pamplilet on the " Siuu^ of the Go-vcmmcnt cf i^^ek'c.'' Alfo examination of J. Wrdkcr, Efq. his ar.fwer to 25. Interrogatory, where he ftates the fa^, of having lately obtained judgment, by default, for upwards of 9000 I. on a bond of imAmnity, without e-veii alleging, jnuch Icfs proving, that plaintiff had fulbined any actual damage. Sec alfo examina- tion of J, Rcld, Clerk of the Court, and li;l by him exhibited of forty-two judgments by default, in the year 1786, amount- ^"S fo /^•z.i^oS 8s. 2d. and on aftions that principally arofe and were adjudged onfuppofed balances due on account. F againll [ 42 ] againll: Peter that on the ground of jufllce, was foUcited againfl: Paul * / When to xhi^ fcene of judiLial demearior we •:Ai.\y tliat the juftice of the Colony is at times difpenfed, from the faultcring tongue of a fudge, wliofe mind, inebriated by a de- bafed enjoyment of the bottle, is incapacita- ted to fupport either decency, reafon, or juflicc, m a Court of Common Pleas, formed by his fole prefence and power, we fhall lament the fituation of that e.xtenfive and complaining Colony -]" ! Hitherto thofe remarks have gone to the evidence offered, that concern the admini- ilration of juflice, before the inferior tribu- * See Appendix, No. XVIIT. f See depofition of James Walker, Efq. barrifter at law at iatcrrogatory 4P. Alfo of Mcfirs. Duike and Le Pailleur, clerks of the Court of Common PlceVi. Alfo J. Young and other ofRccrs of the Court. And a I'lirhtv of evidence among the in\'Ci'l'gation pan-Ts cf Mr. Dc Rou\ illos being repeatedly />/•/.■..(• on ilic bench at hearing caufes, in the Court of Com- Hion Pleas, and making judgments tluit were (and frequently "'.•i'hout a right cf appeal) executed. And of his behaving V in an arhitroy, JcnjHijs, and J:Jgr(XCi-ful manr.ey ! nals. nd of j lift Ice, ciiil tlernearior I Colony is at tcring tongue iated by a de- is incapcicita- y, rcalbn, or Picas, formed 'cr, we fhall c.xtenfive and e gone to the [ the admin i- iijfcrior tribu- . barrifler at law at e and Le Pailleur, Alfo J. Young and ' of evidence among Ics being repeatedly the Court of Com- 'cre (and frequently nd of his hehaviiui laiir.ey nah [ 43 1 nals. The fuperior Court Is compofcd of a numerous and fluduatlng body ; t lie /c ■^'7/7.7- s.v cx.mi'- ii.'.iidni (if thvc Council. It feldom happens that this ['>^ ""i^^'^'- ■^ -f I'll' VVali.iiii Court is made up of the fame members, or Hugi!' Fi..- nunibers. Ideas of French law and riuht, *^""S'= are adhered to by the Camuliau, or l^rench thecou.to! Counfellors. The Englifli Cicntlemen of this Appcmii'x, ° Xo. XIV. Court—" toadminlfterfubftantial juftlcc,"— <': :'""V-^" fomet/mes Judge by the EngUjh, and fometimes " ^)v':X'- by what they believe to be, the French law. " ^;^*--" Suitors whofe laft Appeal is to a Court com- pofcd of Gentlemen " that do not pretend to a ^^ knowledge of the Laivs," and whofe judg- ments have been fo variant, depending upon the French, or Englijh law, as the fitting mem- bers happened to prevail, of the one, or the other, birth and language, painfully feel their rights and pollcfiions, as precarious and in- valuable. On the part of the Merchant s, and com- plaining fubjects, fuch Jiave thev fcen, or experienced the admlniilratlon of Juftice to be, in the Colony of Quebec; under the Iguo- y 2 rancf 1 1' [ 4+ ] Viwcc and ivil!\ or the wifdom and jufticc of unprofejjional iVi^w. — And, the Honorable Judges of the Common Pleas may be ap- pealed to, whether it is under fuch a ftate of fa(fts that they, or their advocates ivithi?!, or tJt/bout tlie Colony, will come forward to the complainants, in the face of a Britilli Parliament ; and Jupport the d'lfpenfation of jujUcCy fince the declared eflablilhment of French laws, by the Quebec A3. ? Is it expeded by the Honorable Judges that thofe complaints, will tbere be conli- dered, " as the foul accufations of defrauding^ " df(ifc5lcdfid)je6ls\' the cruel inflruments of faction, calculated m the turpitude of difloyalty and vengeance, " to infame the minds of the " King's fabjc^Sy and deft roy all confidence in, " and rcfpcSi foTy the tribunals ofjujiice ? " A day may come, when the Honorable Judges, and all the King's fubjeds in Canada, may perceive and acknowledge ; the bell and moft gracious intentions of a Parental Sovereign, to grant to his fubjedts, every I and j Lift Ice ic Honorable may be ap- Lich a ftate of :atcs ivithi?7y le forward to of a Britilli ^ifpenfation of bliihment of a? )rable Judges ^re be conli- if dijraudingt iftruments of :of difloyalty ' miiuls of the confidence in, ^juJliceV e Honorable fubjeds in ::knovvledge ; entions of a his fubjed:s, every [ 45 ] every benefit exprcHcd in the royal procla- mation of 1763; and of which thofe fiihiec'ti. (in the liifcty and comfort, refulting from good order, and efFedive government) were in Qijlate to receive. The Honorable Judges, and the Kind's Se}"-cantSy in that Province, may hereafter perceive and acknowledge, confequcnces 7?^/ forefeen when they confidered, that the 12th se. a^. article of his Majcfty's inftrudions, and vT'^' '•'^• \\\^((t gracious intent'ionsy towards his ancient fubjeds, were not politic, to be carried into effcd. — They may at the fame time call to mind, a fubfequcnt indrudion, to hetter ,^ , , order and eftabli/Ii the courts of the Colony, for thefpeedy and cffetlual diflribiition of law andjujlice, according to the principles of the Brit if con ft hut ion-, as far as the fi?ne can he adapted, to their peculiar circiun- Jlances and ftuation:' And acknowicdo-e. that their OPINIONS were impolitic; That an oi di :ance, fuch as is dircBed by thc"jo^rn:m ... "^ ot the Lu- the Kuigsfald infru^ion would not he f^r ^'■''"'^"'^ 17 70, €( ft €t <( X\ it in i( the l-b. i7^c [ 46 ] ^ ** tbt' (7ihantti;^c of the Pro''jinct\ ur a mor,' ** lpc:dy and cffttlnal dijlribiition of jiiJUcc.'' They in;iy conliJcr that tlic above opinion, and the exertions then made, and lince con- \ tinned in the Colony, were twitbcr the niofl wife, nor the moft jull courfe, to have been taken by the Servants of the Crown, to prelerve the peace or alTedtions of the llib- jed:s in that Colony. In an hour of calm and impartial enquiry, the Honorable Jud[jcs and the King's fer- vants, may think ditFerently tlum heretofore, of thofe conftant ' warm exertions^ in the clofet, or the legiflative council, to defeat every attempt, to bring forward and effec- tuate, the objedts recommended in thofc inflrucftions '^". And however thof exertions were attended with fuccefs j and in what- ever degree foever the refentment of leading charadcrs, ivithin or ivithoiit the Colony, * * See Judges Obfcrvations, pp.gcn 7 and 8, referring to the proceedings in tlie Icgillative council for their exeruons, and condiid of tlie King's fcrvants. have [ 47 ] f.nct'y or ^ //jorr Uon of jiiJUcc.'' above opinion, and fincc con- •e ?u'ithcr the :ourfc, to have the Crown, to ns of the lub- artial enquiry, he King's I'cr- ban heretofore, tertians y in the jncil, to defeat ird and cffec- nded in thofe thof exertions and in what- lent of leading / the Colony, id 8, rrferring to the their exertions, and have have been pnuitled; or lmii hold np the ap- probation oi'his Miijelly's fervai.ts, for iheir fj/f If nl inhl'zeiilons endeavours, by- tliat happy medium, to preferve the Colony in peace : or vvliatever cruel con-jea/ed alperfions, may be conjcdlured to have proiiuccLl a r.-moval from ollice and difirace, of A:;-;? Lieutenant Ciover- nors, and tico membei's of the letrillative o Council, lit different periods ; durin^r the 'H)- vernment of Cieneral Haldimand, for their perfevering endeavors, to eifeduate (in tlieir bell judgment) .he King's gracious inten- tions: yet it will not be becoming the llo- norable Judges to alTert, that thofe removals and difgrace of the King's fervants, pro- ceeded from their condud to fupport the principles and meafures held out by the Royal inftrudions, that marked out alterations in the laws and courts of jufiee, eflabliihed by, and under the Quebec Bill. The motives that lead to the meafures of Government, operating by the prerot^ative of the Crown, are not at all times difelofed: feldom ,!;■): [ 48 ] fcldoni In the dii'mlilion of its univortfy or iniufrful Icrviints ; thou''li it Is ackiiow- lodged, that the whiipers and rumours, Howing from the exultation oF cojijidcntial favoritcsy have no Iniall ivi Ol'lcrva- t 50 ] fentment of his Miiicfly's Minlftcrs, by the dilgrace of an old and f.iithtul iliivant, for having attempted^ in his prhatc piofciTional chara(;n:er, to lay open the real or imaginary diilreiTes of the King's fuhjedls, and to fup- port the honor andintertlls oi the Crown in it's Colony of Quebec ? The Jlononiblc Iiid':;es are plcalld to alTert a right to their oinces, during good behavior, quainJju bene fc gc[jcrint. *' That " tbcy hold feats on the tribunals of jiiflice, ** from ich'icb :hcv cmi ciuy be degraded by a " lezal and cou-i'itiitlonai trial.'' The letters patent, however, that conflitute //V;;/ judges, comnumicate jig greater right, to an open charge, trial, and Judgment, as conjiitutionally elTentiai to a remowil or difgrace, than thole patents an.d offices held by every fervant of the Crov/n, tlrat has been removed in Canada, fince the Quebec Ad; and who have been difi^laced and difgraced wit.bcut fuch right, to attain any knoiieledge of tie canj'es of their reu^ovals. Complaining.; I \\:% :i niftcrs, by the Lil Icrvimt, for uitc pi'ofliTional I or Iniai'iiiary is, and to fup- " the Crown in arc nlcalld to ;, (iiuing good ^crinf. " That inals of jiiflicc, c degraded by a The letters Lte //^tv;/ judges, It, to an open s cojijiitutionaily ice, than thofe ivery fervant of 1 removed in \Si ; and who fii-raced icilbcut 'ioic/edve of tli Complainiiuj, [ 51 ] Complaining fubjeds in Canada, nor in /England, would ever difpute the reafonable- nefs, or the wifdom, or the jufllce, of caufes being avowed, for which judges, or fervants of the Crown In it's Colonies were difgraced. But will the Honorable JudGres ar^rue, and conclude y that, by the removal of the A nor- '''^■■"^'^'"- ney Genera',, their judicial capacity and conduct are ellabiiihcd ? And that all the complaints and ciiarges againft the nncer- ' tainty of the laws, or mal-adminiflration of jiifdce, m Canada, -^vq falje and malicious? In v/hatever degree, the Ilonorabie Judges may be induced to hope, a flu'orable report, by the Crown Law Officers; upon the charges and inveiligation : however it could be m their power, to impeach the evidence oitered, or to explain away the grofs abufcs of trufl, that the inveiligation hold up to view: or obtain what they may confider a mere legal, and conlHtutional mode of im-, peachment and trial : the Honorable Judges. i ^ '-^' mull [ 52 ] mufl coiifelG, that the courfe of jullice by it's ti-ibunals in. Canada, is in a ilate the mofl alarming and dijlrefsfiil to the minds, fortunes, and eftates of the King's fubjeds *. The Honorable Judges are fenfible that the interefls, the honor and juflice of the Crown, have been long, and often appealed tOj to alleviate, or remove, a ftate of anarchy and diflrefs, in the difpenfation of Canadian juilice, unparalleled in any other part of the Britilli Empire ! Se? cxa- From the operation o'i the Quebec Acl, in arniriiv>n of t}>ciion.w. iy~5 to the arrival of Lord Dorcheilcr, in Ciant, Ap- II' ' xj'v?'to''l t^^e fall 1786, the Court of Appeals, has not t;rni"st:rx. had one prrfcfjiojia! charadlcr, to puide it's «• of the * -^ '^ » 6 " nienr"of p^'ocecdings, in reviling the judgments oi un- prnfcijional mc:n, in the Courts of Common Pleas, /?rj^ for a fliort time Peter Livius, Efq. L.L.D. who was rcnioz'cd from his oflice in i77bT. * See Appendlv, No. XX. f Tvlr. Livius was put in commiJion in june, i~';"J, ^nd re- moved May I, 177S. Upon 4 1 of jullice by in a ilate the to the minds, ig's fubjeds ■*. ; fenfible that juflice of the often appealed -f a ftate of ifpenfation of in any other |uebec Acl, in )orchei1:er, in :)peals, has not to guide it's 2,ments of nn- of Common r Livius, Efq. 1 his oflice in me, 1 7 "7, r.nd rc- Upon t 53 ] upon the appointment of a Governor Ge- neral, a remedy was applied to this ddv^:, A Chief Juflice of the firll clafs of profef- fional knowledge and abilities in America, fucceeded to tlie chair, occupied by the Lieutenant Governor, Brigadier General Hope, as prefident of the Court of Errors, or Appeal in Quebec. Whatever clamor or complaint has been made againil: *' t/je Judges;' or Court of Appeals; the duties of the Chief Juflice, in revifmg the proceedings of the inferior courts, brought bi:fbre him, during two years and a half, have fufiiciently cfuibUjhcd the urgent neceffity of reform in the adminiflation of juflice in that Colony. Charges have been brought forward, in fwpport of reiterated complaints; and inquiry and inveftigation, on tliofe co:n.)laints and charges, have laid, for coniideratiun and judi:- ment, fince November, 1787. A dilierent criterion to cipacity, and the ground and juflice cffuch compl-iinls h:is Oi c W' I il.'l [ 54 ] of l.ite mofl: forcih;/ -appeared to the King',^ SLibjeZ(V', from judicial conflructions placed on the C^cbec Bill, yet that the Honorable Judges, prior to that period, have not been held in the eftimation of poifeiring thofe great abilities, they confider their long fervices entitle them to claim. See p. 12 and 5. of Judges Obferva- tions; alio Inveitigation Papers ; the Anfwer and Reply to Judges Obfer- vations, filed 3d of November, 1787/ port, 80 tc llll re- No. II. Article IV'. Of Pet it ion y 1783. 1 HAT the ancient laws and cuf- toms of the country r-s-fpedUng landed ellatcs, marriage fcttlemcnt; , inheritances. " and do\ver, be continued uritil chanc^cd u 2. or (( C( [ 6o ] or altered by tlic legillature of (^cbcc, i ivc ilhit owners niiiy alienate by will, as nruvideu by the Xth Sedt. of the (^ebec Xa." ARTICLE V. **That the commercial Laws of England may be declared to be the Laws of this Province, in matters of tnide and commerce; and that all per- Ibiial actions may be tried by the modes aud decided upon the principles of the common Law of England, until the ilune may be altered, by the legillature of C^ebcc." ARTICLE VIL '' That optiomil Juries may be granted upon all trials in Courts of original jurifdid:ion; and tliat nine members out of twelve may, in ci-'jil caufes, return vcrdidts, and be regularly ballotted for, and a pannel formed (as in England) either in the cale of an ordinary, or a fpecial Jury, at the option of the party applying for the fame." ARTICLE XII. " Your petitioners fen- libly feel, that, were the mo/i icifc and fit Jaws eliabliflied among the people, yet their w^elfare, their fecurity, and their comfort muft entirely depend^ en ajujl and " impartial iiiii ^ li of (;^cbcc, te by will, as f the (^cbec : commercial leclared to be in matters of that all per- by the modes ciples of the mtil the ilime legillature of pt'ional Juries s in Courts of nine members caufes, return ballot ted for, in England) irdinary, or a of the party titioncrs fen- no/i rcifc and ; the people, ritv, and their , en djuj} and '* impartial [ 6. ] imparf id/ execution, of fuch Laws. What- ever conflitution the fubjeds of the Crown in this Province may obtain, t be equal and true adminiftration of Jullice, mull be the bafjs of their happineisj nor is it but li'ith the iitmoji fervency y that your peti - tioners implorey that the feats of judice may be filled by men of jurifprudent learning, and whofe abilities at the fame time they are adequate to their employ- ments, may be fo rewarded as to be con- fined to their funclions of adminiftering julHce." No. III. Conclujion to Petit it 'jU of 17 84. oUCH are the Intrcaties and prayers of the loyal fubjeets of this Province, and in full confidence they truft that your Majelly will relieve them from the anarchy and confufion, which at prefent prevail m the Laws and Courts of Jullice in this Province, hy "ichich their real pro- perty is rendered infecure, trade is clogged, and th'M good faith which ought and would fubiifi: among the people, and which is " the [ 62 ] *' the life and Uipport of commerce Is totally " dcjiroyciir No. IV. Sec p. 44 of JuJg.,- " Oblcn . !'Ati;u'i from the Counter Petition ailuded to by the Ilonor.ihle Judges in llieir Ob- fv. rvatlt)ns, ilxc. " Nous nc pouvons memc imaginer " que r aclc du Parlenient, qui nous accorde " nos proprietes et ccs loix, dit oitcndu an- " toi-'fcr des alterations reiterees, qui r'.etrui- " roient leurs principes fondamentaux, ou ** meler avec ces loix, d\nifres loix, foit *' gc'./t'rdli'Sy (o'xi particulicrcs q'liont des prin- " cipcs differens, ct qui font pen convena- *' bles a cc pays, dans la vue de favorifer ** une certaine clalfc d'individus feulemcnt ; ** pdi'ccqncy du ni.'idfigc (ic il/\cr/c's loix, en un fucnir pays, il nc ptut rcfultcr quune " confjf/ionj li' (h- pinion cut re Ics fidets, et des ** incertitudes ruincnfcs (iiixj'ii'nillcs.^' " We cannot even imagine that, the Act of *' Farlia'iient which has granted to us, our '* properties, and our laws, can he under jlood to *' autborifcy [ 63 ] ercc is totally Ion anudcd to II ibcir Ob- ;mc imaginer nous accordc '/ ciitcndu ait- s, qui r'.ctrui- iientaux, ou YJ- loix, iS\\. ont dcs prin- Dcu convena- i. \ dc favoriicr is fculcment ; fcs loix, en UH fuhcr quune 'sjhjets, ct dcs Hit's.' ' lat, the A3, of \\\ to us, our V uniicr/hod to *' autborlfcy " author I fc, reiterated altcraiions, that iliall " dcftroy the fundamental principles ofthofc " laws, or hlcnd with them, other laws, " whether pyiicral, ov particular, that have " different principles • and that are hut little '* adapted to this country, with a I'iczo to *' favour a certain clafs of individuals only ; *' hecaufe, from the mixture of different laws, " in the fame country, there could only ref]ilt " confufion, divijion among his Majeflys f'uh- ** jetls, and ruinous incertainty to families. '' The Canadian or New fuhjee'ts have not merely flated a right to retain their ancient Laws immutahlc, but have complained in petitions, of changes made in thofe Laws, by the Kings Council, to favor particular inte- refls. And in other petitions, have praved an intercclhon with Parliament, for tlie re- cftablifhment of their Laws, and to prevent all alterations m future. Seepage -j'j to 8i, of a pamphlet en- titled, " State of the Government of the Province o/'^^/ebec." No. (( ti i: n « « <( «( (I « ', is neverthelci.s to the laft degree dangerous in a country of mixed nations, habits, and languages, where the name of the party, if the contejlsy refpe^s tl^c fubjlantial inte^ rejl of the Croivn and Nation, ivill he changed into the ferious Difcrimination of loyal and diililfeded." 2()th Marcby 1787, <( i< No, X, " Protefl. Art. VI," IjE CAUSE ivitbout fome regulations to quiet the Murmurs againji the courfe of adminijlering fujHce "which has obtained here for Years paft, exprejjed in the Reports on our table, from the Magi ft rates and Merchants of the Province, and the com- plaints to the King's Minifters, by the Merchants of London, the Commerce and Settlement of the Colony, cannot advance, in " the [ n ^ « (( <( (( if tl «( f/jc Ccurfe Ncceffary to give it Jtrength, for its c^j:n kcurity, and to cover the two other Provinces, fortunately to all of them, commit led to tnc wifdom and vi- gilance of the noble Lora, who is io well difpofed, and qualilied, to raife them to fafety and profperity, if their cheerful co- operation fhall not be wantin^^." 26th March, 1787. No. XL Extradt of Heads of the Argument or gene- ral Charges brought by the Commerce before the Legiilative Council, on the 14th oi April, 1787. 1 HxAT the legal and judicial con- flrudion given in this Province upon the Quebec act was, that it fully introduced the general EdicHwA ordinancies oi France, and the Cuflom of Paris, as ufed and exer- cifed during the French Government, as the only rule in His Majeily's Courts for *' deciding civil rights between all His Ma- " jeily's (C n <( « il « [ 7S ] ^' jefty's SubjedLs old and new." " That ere Mr. C'lr's St. Bill. *' the Judgments of the faid Courts ** not maile iiponfuch Rule of prevailing Law, " cither in ?<';/'//irw/(y admitting, or rejeding, " the Edicts, or Ordinances ; or the Articles ** of the Cullom of Paris ; and did at times, admit either, and at times rejed: both, and adopt the Eiiglijh, Statute and Common Law, as the Law to adminifler fubjlan- tial Jujiiee.'' " That this uncertainty in the judicial pro- cecdingG and '^Judgments of Laic, and in the excrcife of a judicial authority, ?iot founded in the Law of the Province, that legally ought to prevail, and thereby Legif- lating\w\\\ {land proved, upon enquiry in- to the f'vera! Cafes ftated at the Bar of the Council, ■Ani\ others, which your Pe- titioners are ready to adduce." " That thofe evils were maniieit and rui- nous to the King's oubjedts ; that they re- ** fultedfrom the Caufs, which the propofed " Bill would not only continue, but infinite- " ly increaf'.'' In fuppcrt of the reafons offered by the Commerce again/l the Bill of Mr. S. Ours, iind for that of the Chief Juftice's, twenty- three <( tc ti ong the articles of which it is dated, " as a further " proof that the eftabliftment of the civil '' <-ourts. requires immediate ammendme.it, 't appears that a deep wound has been L 2 « givca [ H ] " given to the Proteflant religion, by the |iidges of the Court ofConitnoii Picas <-?/ ^cln'c, fitting as yudgcs cf the pi-cro^^^aiivc Court', tlicy, having by tlicir judgnicnt con- figned ovjr, to Roman dubollc guard'uvi>\ to be educated in that religion, jhc Pro- tellant infants, duly baptized and received inlo the eftablilhed Church of Ewjldud, the Children of ^//'/ /l;/^-////!) Protefcant, ijy one ot his Majefty's new Subjecls, v/Iiofc dif- taiit relations and friends, exceeded far in nuiFiber the grandfather and paternal uncle ^ the fponfors at the haptijin of the childreny therefore the rii^hts thefe lattery contended for, to fup::rintend th." education of the " laid children, -as they were bound to do, " could noty or ivould not, be admitted by thofe Judges. But if ever a difcretionary pou'er could be exercifed, or the juftice *' of a caufe received, this ftriking intereft- ing occafion, required it. Therefore by by a like rule of deciiion, the children of the paternal uncle above cited, who has "y/Tvfons bvan Englilh Proteflant, i^'W^/, in *' call; of th.e death of their parents, by the ** interpoiition of the fame perp.nsy be fub- ** ]cO. to be educated in the religion of the z *' Church (< tt (I a (( tt n (( it <( K it l< t< (C it tt [ 85 ] t( Church of Rome: and f'omfuch decree Sy no appeal is ejhihlijhed by La'iv F' See P rot eft 6th of Marchy 1780, /;; proceedings of the legiftative Council. The Cafe alluded to was, Acklam Bond- field, Merchant, who had married M. Boiirouac a Canadian, foon after the efl:a- blilhment of Civil Government in Canada; and died cfter the Quebec Bill took effed in 1776. In a matter of Tythes, one Jean Pain in the year 1783, renounced the Roman Ca- tholic faith, and was admitted a member of the Church of England. The Roman Ca- tholic Priefl of the parifli, where Pain re- fided, neverthelefs inlifted on his payment of Tythes, and upon refufal, a profecution en- fued, before a B.o?nan Catholic yudgc of the Court of Common Pleas, who gave judg- ment, that Pain tliough ?20t of the Roman Catholic Church was ftill fubjcd: to Tythes. A judgment, held up as contrary to Law, and as contrary to policy, or juilice; and of ferious political confequence in the Colony. No. XIV. r S6 ] No. XIV. In the Court of Common Pleas at Mon- treal, the bankrupt Law of France was con- ^iJered as the I.,aw of Quebec, from March ^779 to the year 1781, and perfons dif- charged under the title of Se^^y/ce de cefjion (dehvery of EfFeds) ; after that period, fuch d.fcharge was refufed, without any Law to ^iter the rule of dccijmi that had i^revailcd tor years. *Sc. cxa^nlnation of J. IValker, Efq. at In^ tcr rogatory 21, and examination of A. David- fon,^Efq. Interrogatory 22, alfo Appendix to " State of the Government of^iebecf xVo. 15 and 17, the latter a judgment in the Court of Appeals (21ft of February, 1778) avowing the fid of record, oUdmiJJion, and rejeaion, of the Code Marchand, or Bank- rupt Law of France, by the federal Courts in the Province. See Fn- vcrtigation Papers. No. V. XV. Testimony of Llenderfo on is offered in \\\q: Cafe Hart, that the Plaintiffs council [ 87 ] council infifled on proceeding to trial, and ad- ducing proof. That Mr. Judge Frafcr then produced a private letter of informationy from his friend and acquaintance (who was aUb interefted in the caufe though not named in thefuit) that fet forth explanations to his s.e Exa- fricnd the Judge, and denied the fac5ts ftated w."t:cii; in the declaration and demand. And that J^etgll" upon this ftatement the Honorable Judge vidfni^/E/C declared from the Bench, that he -ivould pay j'"waiic2; viore credit to the letter in his hand, than any ^^^ evidence the Plaintiffs counfel could pro- duce ! The Judge was fatisfied. The evi- dence refufed to be heard: and the Caufe difmiffed with Cofls ! In the Cafes Perkins, i\ Bolton, and Dobie, V, Grant the lame Court ordered prcof to be made of value given for pro- miffory notes. In the Cafe of Colonel Campbell, v, James M'Gill, Mr. Judge Frafer, firft Juflice of the fame court — refufed that thofe rules would apply, alledging " that he had known " Colonel Campbell for many years, and " that his honor and character weip-hed \\'ith O " him much, nor could he ever believe that " Colonel 5V \^ *\' IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) // >, ^ .-^Z ^^ av.s of Pnf^land; but in common, [have *' ;:'/.-' been able, exndly to afceitain on ichat " J.ii.i^ they have been founded. I have " Ivuown Cafes judged hy ilifj'crcnt rides of " L(rii'\ the greater mnnber of Judgments *' pronounced in Caufes in v/hich J have *' b':en concerned, / conjider lo have ])een " decided rather on the Judges fe-if' of " i'(iuity, [ 9i ] ** Equity, and moral rectitude, than am' ** known principle of Law." " I have licaril Juilgc Southoiiic declare ** upon the hcncl'j that he had no ocai/ion f'o)- ** a knoi.i'lcd'^c oi' the French La-Li\ contained ** in the books, then on the table in Court, *' (!s his co}iJcience li'ns the Lcm, \vhich guided " his yudi^ments. Examination of IF. D. Poi.e//, Fj>j. " I have heard the Coutume de Paris ad^ " mitted to be Law, and not to be Lav/, or " at leaft have found it not to he followed^ or " oblerved as luch, by al/j or any of the Judges of the faid Court, except Mr. judge Southon/e, whom I have aiways found conjijient in his declarations, that it " was no Law to govern him." Examination of Arthur Daiid/ln, F./q. (( «( «( No. XVIL J'AI quelque fois vu moi meme (et " j'ai entendu dire qu'il arrive fouvent) dans " la Cour de Plaidoycrs Communs a Mon- ** treah [ 96 ] tr. al; piiiu'lj\ilcmcut lorfqiic Ics procc-* durt's nc ioAt point ccritcs *, /es Avocuts ri'jpcciij's ties piirlii's, siiitcvr'jWprc niutucllc-' n::'Hff i'i' I': c'jUp: la parollc^ h Jin d'cmpccbcr Jh pr.riii' dJccrfc D'i;TA!ii,iR fcs prcuvcs et dc dcduii\' fcs i;i'y;c;is : ct aii milieu dc la Ca- cophoiiic qui cii rclliltoit : roiry Ics yiigcs, Ics Crcf/icrSf Ics pariicsy Ics avocats non conccrncSf ititcrvciiir corifufcmmcnt ; par des 'railleries, ihs /iircajh;s, et dc reclamations i chacun a fa mode \ ct Ic Jiigenient fortir i/timediatementy du rcfultat de ccs fcenes grotcfqucs et indecent es, que nulle exprej'-' Jion nc peut reprcfenter ! •* J'ai iouveiit cntendii Ics Avocats, et Ics parties Ic plaindre, que par une telle pra- tique, lev.rs affairs ctoicnt yngees, fans avoir^ pufaire Connoitre les faits, les circonjlances, ni les me rites de lenrs Caufes /" ^ee Examination of Jos, Papineau, Not aire a Montreal. Jjrcejligation Papers i^tb Scptcmacr, 17H7. * In ill! Caufes urn'.;';- C- 10 flcrling, .ind wlicrc no appeal is alloweJ by t'ac orJinancci of che Governor and Council. " I haver « ft €f « « [ 97 ] •* I have foinetiines myfclf ll-cn, (lukI I ** have heard that it often happened) in the " Court of Common Pleas, at Montreal; " principally when the proceedings in the Caufes were not reduced to writing *, die refpeahe advocates of the parties mutually interrupt each other, in order to prevent " the advcrfc party from eftabUjhing his proofs, " and deducing his reafons ^ a^nd in the midjl of the Cacophony that attended thefe proceedings, I have feen the Judges, the " Rt'gi/lers of the Court, the Parties, the Ad^ locates not employed i?i the Caufs, con- fufedly interpofe, %vith railleries, farcafms, and reclaimings, each in his way; and the Judgfnent immediately ijj'ue from the refult of /A/' grotefque and indecent/vm, that no expreflion can reorefent ! " I have often heard the advocates, and the " Parties complain, that hy fuch a prav^ice, " their interejls and rights were adjudged, " ^vithout their being able to exhibit the *' facts, the circumjlances, or the merits of " their Caufs /" • In all Caufes under X;.io ftcrling, and wlicrc no appeal is allowed by the ordinances of tlie Governor and Council. ({ <( (< « « (( (( N See [ 93 ] Sec alfo cxiiminatlon of Jiimcs Walker, Kfq. at Interrogatories 27 and 48, of the Judges quarreling on the bench, and quiting the feat of Jullicc, that on fuch occafions funk into inaction, ordifgrace, by the want of concord, or competency ; in the divifion, or intemperance of a dirtradted Court ! See alfo examination of A. Davidfon and J. Walker, Efq. Advocates that teftify to the fcenes above defcribcd by Jofeph .Papineau, and to the overbearing and arbitrary condudt of the Judges at Montreal. J. W. at Interrogatories 46 and 48. A. D. at ditto, 43 and 50. No. XVIII. i.voeo.iii. A. Was profecuted on a penal Statute, fxam'.ofw! for felling liquors without licence, and B D. Powell, . , ^,. 7 /• 7 Eiq. at In- called as a witnels. 1 he defendant was ac- aifo'j."wai- quitted, and the ivitncfs injlantly condemned, kcr, at 24. M ^1 r • rT- § ,^^ § -^ O O ;iJ jj J^J ^ ir > ^ > > *• ^vfjj O OJ U (J ;^ '^•V U Ui U, Ih U ■^ N^ OJ 5; t^ MM l|^,^ o ^ ^ O o» o y »:i -^ 3 C-! - rj ^ cq ^ .- ^ S»-H I- C/5 u '-0 o • • :: =3 3 3 w- Q o o ^ o t. h^.Ch ^ <> J d, <; -a ^ H ^ O ,r3 -Q O G ^ r-* r^ ^^ -J ^~^ _« i^ C ^ ri • -H r74 C/) t— ( CO fc, ^ »— ^ M O M (A Q { o o oo -d -a ^ > > • o o c ha o •t-t • >-« . o 2 o o •*-> 4^ iZ ^ ^ "Z O 4 4 • 4 oo CJ 1-1 cl <:SoQ 4-» c •— • o w Q< «-<"■ o u O 4-1 O > ^ -a -73 u C O 1 n3 -rJ T3 -d 1 •73 13 "13 -73 1 (U f ^ ■i! n3 O 3 ^ ,^ 'i^ 0:} <^ 'ii ^ '3, ^i{ u V^ ^ Pt^ u "u u u u> u v^ • i-H u< HH J- ij D (U CJ > ^"c > CJ CJ > > CJ CJ > > 1-^ aj < > OJ u U. U C3 4-i ^:i Ul u u u u u u u 1 (L> Oh < O u 1 1 1 1 1 ' 4-1 G u G O a- O cJ .2^ t: rG 4-« G -H U J? l-i CJ 3 rt G G CJ _ 'G .ti »> f^ O O-'d .2 -U5 PQ ^ O .CJ rj ^ ^ r"^ 3 .2- ^"^ O O G r- C3 --T3 G «-< OJ o S-i d UJ G Due Kay Harr W3 o G Will Edw o G 8- j^ 2 o CO CJ CJ 4- 3 to 4-1 G J2 'a; a, Oh < [:^L _p_ ^?> fi ?> ^ t'^^ ^ p> C-i ? ^ ta ^ CJ jG 4_) o CJ O o G o u< Ui 'o -73 fl> 4..I Ui 3 1) G G 4.) N u c 'd G >^ CJ < 3^ CJ O X Q G O • 4-) 3 -73 -73 O H o c« CT3 TS -G .O G rt 03 CO ^ 'id G ^ > ;g j3 G CJ a -i O-G U v3i^ ^.':i j:: % O •— > 5 /-^ ^^ o •—J •— > O . O CO *^ Oh > u O - a IX C • H-4 ^ o 4-» p O O O O O o O O o 4-» Q • ^ ...« ..H .^ c. .^ .t;; .t; G Q Q G ACa Q q QQCOQ a* 0-, < • IX oc ) O O Lo O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'T3 1 1 g ^ u Ui . 'TS ^G 3 Revc firmed 12 > - 'r "r '^ "^ - '^ '^ ."3 >>>>>> > 'T3 > > > Ul *- udgment; Con rt (U 1 Oh < OJ 1 *-> a < \Z ^ Vj G O 4^ • CO *-> G 3 13 b Jordan erland an t and oth iife and o I Brallier dlbn and • ^ -^ o s /3 Se5 o 4-1 C/3 G CO 1 he Same Charles Stev The Same Campbell H .• 3J O 4-1 • • • J^ ?i fi ?^ ^* r^ • • • • • t^ iJ ?> C-» C T3 u> ■4-« s:^ i-H G Oh C/3 ^ • ^ G u •« ^ ^ • 'tj y >^ c/; ppellan u, CO and Co lomons Cerre ickwoo Sicard and oth unro Lindfa c c rG u. c/) rt :> 53 (D H a O o Barclay Levy So Gabriel 5John Bl; Amable Ferlanc John Ml William • ojames G The Sair Sir Thon The Sam WUliam N CO o » 4-* -x: 'X2 J^ *-> -t-i c C4 CO p-t t3 C Go -a 3 3 O O 4-1 4-1 O O 3 « .t! .t; > > • »H U lU u Vs I-. u. i^i ^ s 1 •2 n 3 o o o ^ so -TS -a > ^ S o TS TS g O ,^ (U V V" 4J > OJ OJ > -2 ^ > u u ^ ,r>, '^ ^ c *^ '-; *j 4-1 tj 4-> c a C o c o o 3 ^ *i fi fi ^ C-' ?> ?> tJ c-> 3 u f^ 3 3 Oh VO M !U Pi £ CO ^c '«-• r-i C o > > f-< r-i fcJO rt o > ^0^ 2 0^ I I C/5 CJ O o I —> _j ^ --1 n"< h-* ij l-; r-« »— ,-' ■'^ %-< y:^*::: s-i^ t ^ d G '- .S "^ M ^ ^ >, O ^ •^i ^ J- 1* f == o ;r o ^ ^- i^ . [ io6 ] No. XX. It appears that in the month of No- vember laft. Complaints and Petitions were reiterated to the Governor General, expref- five of the anarchy and confufion in the Co- lony of Quebec ; from the luant of certainty in the haius and Courfe of adminiilering Juf- tice. A Petition prefented to the Governor General iVom the Committee of Merchants and others, w^ith a prayer that the fame might be conveyed to his Majefty's Minif- ters, contiiins the following declaration: " That your Memorialifts have .^ceived information from Adam Lymburner, Efq. their Agent in London, that the confide- ration of the affairs of this Province, have, from unforefeen obllacles, been poftponed by the Kings Minifters, 'till the next Sef- iTons of Parliament, ivbilji your Memo- ** rialiils regret the occafions which have " retarded the difcufTion of their Petition, " for a reform in the conftitution of this Province, they beg leave to Hate to your Lordfhip, that the grienjances which ori- ginally gave rife to their Petition and com- " plaints. t( *i €i It It « << (( tt '> O ii t( it ft *t • t( tl n [ 107 j p/riwts, do 7?/// cxi/l; ancltJiat the /;.,//-. cacy and uncerta'mty of the Lawsj and the contraditlory decifilons, in the Courts of Jurticc thereon ; and the confufion which prevails in the ^orm^ oi 'Judicial procc^d- nigs, have become more and more nianifell and dcjiruaive to the interefts of His Ma- jclly's Subjects." November y 1789. FINIS.