r.> Ax. y-^.'va. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) & ^, -c 1.0 I.I 1.25 hi u 12.0 1.4 1.8 1.6 ^ //^ '/■ * i? / V Phpto^phic sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTEt),N.V. I4S80 (716) 873-4503 # V iV c « ^^ 1; '-b^ '^'h'- W &? CIHM/ICMH Microfiche CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked beiow. ./ v/ D D D D D D D Coloured covers/ Couverture de couteur '^ Covers damaged/ Couverture endommag^e Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaurde et/ou pelliculde □ Cover title missing/ Le tit itre de couverture manque □ Coloured maps/ Cartes g^ographiques en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bieue ou noire) Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other maierial/ Reiii avec d'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La re liure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsioR le long de la marge intdrieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutAes lors dune r.stauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, torsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont pas iti filmies. Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl^mentaires: L'Institut a microfilme le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a ete possible de se procursr. Les detaiis de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-^tre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite. oc qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage sont indiquds ci-dessous. □ Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur □ Pages damaged/ Pages endommag^es □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurees et/ou pelliculees Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages d^color^es, tacheties ou piquees r~~| Pages detached/ Pages ddtachses Showthrough/ Transparence Quality of prir Quality in^gale de t'impression includes supplementary materii Comprend du materiel supplementaire Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible Q I I Quality of print varies/ r~n includes supplementary material/ r~l Only edition available/ The to th The i posa of th filmii Ortgi begii the I sion, othei first sion, or illi n Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure, etc.. cnt it6 film^es A nouveau de facon a obtenir ia meilleure image possible. This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est filmd au taux Je reduction indiqu^ ci-dessous. 10X 14X 18X 22X 26X 30X y 12X 16X Thai shall TINU whic Mepi diffei enttri begir right requi meth 20X 24X 28X 32X < A y-' t Th« copy filmed h«r« has b««n r«producad thanks to tha ganarosity of: The Nova Scotia Uegislative Libraty Tha imagaa appaaring hara ara tha bast quality possibia considaring tho condition and JA^iblllty of tha original copy and In kaaping with tha filming contract spacifications. Original copias in printad pwpar covars ara fllmad beginning with tha frcnt covar and anding on tha l9st paga with a printad o" illustratad impres- sion, or tha back cover whan appropriate. All other original copies are fiin^ad beginning on the first page with a printad or illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the laat page with a printad or illuatratad impreaaion. The last racorcjed frame on each microffcha shall contain the symbol —i^( meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "gNO"). whichever applies. Maps, plates, charo. etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Thoae too large to be entirely included in one eupoaure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand comer, Imtt to right and top to bottom, as many frames aa required. The following diagrama illustrate the method: Lexeirrplaira liim^ fut reprodu^t grdce i la ginirotiti de: The Nova Scctia L«gisiative Library Las imagaa suivantea ont itt reproduites avec Is plus grand soin. compta tenu de la condition at de la nettat* de I'exemplaire fUmi. et an conformity avec tea conditiona du contrat de filmage. Lea exemplairea originaux dont la couvorture en papier eat imprim^e sont filmte an commandant par le premier plat at en terminant soit par la darnlAre page qui camporte une empreinte d'lmpreaaion ou d'lllustration, soit par le second plat, selon le eas. Tous les autres itxamplairea originaux sont filmte en commandant par la pramidlre page qui comporte une smpreinte d'Impresaion ou d'llluatration et en terminant par la derniire page qui comporte una telle empreinta. Un das symbolee suivants apparaitra sur la demiAra image de cheque microfiche, selon le cm: Io symboie — ^ signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbole V signifie "FIN". Les cartaa. planches, tableaux, etc, pauvent dtre film^a it dee taux de rMuction diff Arents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre reproduit en un seui cifch6, il est film^ i partir de Tangle sup4rieur ga jche, de gauche h droite, et da haut en baa. en f renant le nombre d'Images n^essaire. I as diagrammes suivanis illuatrent la miithoda. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 ■fF ^OVASCOTU --— i^ ^^=^«^ PROVINCE HOUSE "1 Kafe^'.-.:*^ -,i.M-^i\- mmm (h^ n IN THE SUPREME COURT, 1881. t GEORGE H. SMITH, CAUSE— ^ m /JOSEPH BELL, Plaintiff. Defendant. ^ APPEAL. 1 FROM COUIVTY COURT. FRED. J. TRBMAINE, - THOMPSON'fe GRAHAM, Appellant. Appellees. ROBEHT McCONNELL, Pkistbh, Trur.). N, 8. \ ,i5»*^-*a«- ;^^ .w^swR ■»*-■■ *' ^--^^^S" y jiptS^.' mmmmmm i-'tsumt^r- 9 Page. (Jortificate of Judge Johnston, No. 1,.. , 2 Minutes of Evidence taken at Trial No. 2, 3 Judge Johnston's Judgment, No. 3, 8 Writ and Declaration and Notice^, No. 4, Smith /?». Bell, 9 Appearance and Pleas, No. 0, do 10 Exhibit "A. J. W. J," Bill of Sale, Smith to Smith, 11 " "B. J. W. J." Memo, goods levied by Sherift', 12 •' "C. J. W- J." Deed— Young to Smith, 13 " ''A." Docket of Judgment, Morrison vh. Smith, 13 " "E." J. VV. J." Memo. Smith to Bell, 13 " "F. J. W. J." Record, Morrison vs. Smith, 14 •' '"G. J. W. J." Execution, Morrison vs. Smith, 14 " ">I. J.W.J." Account Saleh, Shand, 15 '• ''L. J.W.J." Writ and Particulars, Morrison i'-s. Smith, lo '• "M. J.W.J." Praecipe, " 16 " "N." Costs '(bill of " 17 " "O." Ptecord, Hawley r.v. Smith, 17 " '-P.'" Discharge, Guardian of G. H. Smith, IS .^ I ^*t,rrr''^W^ IN THE COUNTY COURT, 1881. H^LIIFi^X, SS. Gkougk it. SMtTii, Plaintiff CmiHii — vs. Joseph Bell, De eiidaut. The I'laiutilV heroin appeals from my jtulgment given herein tor the defendant on the 18th day of .luls', A. D., 1881, and said avpeal having been perfected to my satistaet.-n, 1 certify to the Supreme Court the appeal papers tollowmg : The order fen- appeal marked No. 1. . „ , , xt o lA Tlu mim-tes of evidence taken at the trial Marked JNo. A. lu The uidi,nnent given by me hen;in marked No. 3. , , vr , ■ b "'sviii of Sunuiions herein and notiee.s thereon nnirked No. 4. .''.J .ippearaic" niid Pleas marked No. i\ The Exiiibils put i.i jn the trial, viz = , _ , Zxui'.it - A., J. W. J.," Bill of Sale with schedule. " a, J. W. \," Memo, of goods levied by Sherilt. -I' J W J " Abstract trom deed Young *'/«/ to Smith. A.'-' Frothonotary's docket of Judgment in Morrison r.. ^uiith. Mem.x ot agreement. _ Record in Morrison -s. Smith. _ Ex<,'cntion in Morrison rs. Smith. ''I" Account Sales, J. Shand. _ ^ '* L." Writ of Summons in the suit Morr son i-a-. Snutli. '•M." Praecipe for Snmmins, Morrison f«. Smith. •' N." Bill of C )sts in Morrison r.v. Smith. ■'O." Record (abstract) Ilorley rs. Smith. " '■ P." Order for discharge, G. McKenzie. Given under mv hand this 16th day of Sept. A. D., 1881. JOHNSTON '• F." " G " No. I. coTJisTTY aajj:Rrr, issi. 30 t3:a.Tji:f'j^x:, ss. George H. Smith, Plaintiff. Cause— •{ rs. JosEi'u Bell, Defendant. On motion it is ordered. That the Plaintiff have leave to appeal ''"^l^'; ;V1'^;;;|;'^ herel^y grantecause the learned j udge improperly rejected evidence on the tnal of this cause 5t.h Because the def.>udant was allowed to go into the question ot traud m legaia tiiiS£s»ffer_-*ft.-',j^Ji i 8 ..h^Jt^t^^^ -w «Wiuw:4 liMIWWBMBMpifeiSi ' JiimpHM44*i ' iii:i^ » ■_ .'flpp^fe ^*5 \ 3. to the Rill of Siil(! put in evidence by the Plaintifl; without any plea rf tVaud bi'in.ir on the record. , . , £• • i * • 4.1 6th, BeoauHe the learned judge received and admitted evdcnceof ;i judgment in th- suit of Morrison rs. Smith, the wame not having been properly proved. 7th, Recau«e the learned Judge improperly received in evidenee an h.vecution is- sued in the Huit of Morri.^on (w Smith, said Execution being issued on a judgment which was not properlv or legally proved ,, . , . , • -i ri\ Sth Bec.use the record in the suit Morrison vm S nith, received in evidence, was 50 incomplete and improperly received, ind was not the reconl of the .)..dgment pleaded in this cause. ^ • xi r» *i Uth, IkH'iiuse the Record received in evidence and the .judgment in the i rothono- tarv's iud-'iuciit book, put in evidence by the defendant, are incousisteiu. ^ " loth, Because the execution in the suit Morrison rs Smith, received in evidence by the learned Judge, was improperly received. x- 1 , ilth, IV-cause there is no evidence that the ollicer levvmg under the execution had the writ, or warrant, in his p(*ssession at the time of Icvving. , . , And on the grounds taken and argiujd on tlu- trial, and also becau.se the said execu- tion was never returned into the said 'Jouiity Court. Dated at Halifax, this lOth day of September, A. D.. 1881. BY THE (X)UUT, On motion of Mr. Tremiune > J- PARSONS. for Plaintiff. \ ^1«'''- No. 2. July 13, 1881. Gko. II. Smith /x Joski'ii Bell. Geo. H. S.mitu. Plaintill.— Received l)ill ot smIc fromW. H. Smith of property. W. H. Smith's .-'i'-nature is to bill of sale. [ was iu possession of articles mentioned in bill of sale. Souie'of the arVicies'niontioned in bill of sale talvvn ..'it of my po.sse.ssiou by the sheriir Bell, bv Hamilton his deputy. Bill of sale teiuler-d. bill of UO Cr..sJxmNin,;I m io Jiill 0/ ^;,,'..-Bndy in my handwriting. My sister Witness to of sale 1 was present. Witness and IFilliam H. Smith, my lather and Mrs. Smith, my mother, were present at the executi..;;. I filed document myself Oth July, 1880. Bill ot side executed September, 1S71I. A — Bill of sale received. .\., J. W. J. Smith stands aside to examine Sheriir Bell. Sii<--IUKF Bfil— Hamilton mv deputv. The property I ook was on the premises that had been occupied by William H. Smith, baker. Memo. B contains the articles tiken by me and the price I got for the articles. B — B tendered and received. . , ,r • 1 1 • .1 < ro.%s cxamliHci-Kxiicnfum against Wm. H. Smith. He carried on business on the preini'ses for some vears. .Vbuut the time of getting writ of sunnnons vr execution. I heard W. II. Smith had le't the country. All my knowledge ot levy and execution is from my deputy. I received the proceeds myself. , , , .^ Geo ' H Smith, examlnaflon remnic/.-The articles taken by sheriff were 11 bill of »ale. The deputv sVierifV, iJlarence Ham" Iton. on morning ot sale in Auj 80 included in igust, 1880, came to the h..use, and when articles were oflered tbr sale, by Sbaiul, (or myself; protest- ed against sale taking place. I instructed auctioneer to proceed with sale. Deputy SheHff took them out of po.ssession of auctioneer. He interfered wnth the deb. very o the articles a'ter -roods had been s Id Time of redemption mentioned 111 bill ot sale had not 90 expired" by a month or two, at time of sale. The grantor, Wm. II Smith, consented to my making sale. Hor,se Harry produced at sale $3.>. Mare i^37. I was at sale Deputy protested against sale as each artic'e w-s not up ; Horse Harry worth $40, as also the mare. mmtmvim mmmmmm" fom* [ 100 C-mM exMml»ene year. I was in Wm Foster « office; had notice in paper 2n.l yea:-, had ..ffice home till last 18 months; had desk in Treraaine's office. I pai.l no r.nt for my olfice home; it w,,8 in my bedroom^ Di^ not advertise; no sign-board. House, conu-r Agricola and Charles Streets My office at home is about two miles from Ouurt House. Had neve!- been robed in Supreme Court or Gounlv ^" urt , nevever had anv contested suit i:«. S-ipreme or (.ounty Court. 1 raecipe book contains nieiro. of all mv fees received. My business did not require an t vborate sett of books. I did some buViness on credit; did not enter it; it was small. All my income as a lawvc-r does not appear in the praecipe ami (^ash book. I was managing and 130 looking af.er my tather'« business while 1 was practising. I was carrying on business not er n^v own name ; looked after the busine.ss generally. I made purchases for the busi- ,H.s.— flour, &c. I kept mv fatl.-'.s books; lie had no book keeper but me I have at- tended shop, and sold brerul. Uread bills iMid accounts made up every night. I divided my time between baker's shoo and office ; ehecKed .lehvery o. bread every night; looked after delivery and pnrcl asing of t«our. Average of Hour received 6 or , barrels par day When he went awav he was baking up four barrels per day. No agreement as to my .ahu-y. ' ^fy work, while I was studying was an equivalent for mv bc.nl Keeol'lect when bill of .ule executed; can't .ay day of week when executed; 1 wrote bill of sale. I told m v fat ner we ought to have a settlement. I filed bill of sale 140 awayin a drawer after its execution; date written in aUime ■ execution; filed o. the day H was executed The rest of the family knew about bill Oi sale. Goods not appraised at time of execution. All property, my fathers property remained on premises after execution of bill of sale 1 eonsente I father t'hould have the use of them Father aad the same property in '80 as he had in '79 ; horse and mare ; all he had in 79. Had ex- press and bread waggon ; had harness in. '79 asid '80 ; sett harness not in bill of sale, nor f^),,,- nnllnrs. T prepared schedule; mv father made oi.t list ot articles for me. Goods I i 1 i. ij u;,» t,^ ■i,A\ Rill of sale mjuti )iiO(l at time sold by Shand under mv instruction. V^-^.^*^ ^"'"t,.';*,' v She^^/ n<.t allow g)ods goods advertized. Shaud sold everyuung. ^^^^P^^^^^fJ"" ., ,., i„ ra,ui> opposite loO ?o" e delivered. Articles bid 'in at -le by pensons -^^X^^^l^t^^ g.>od\lway arti<.le3. Shand's bookkeeper marked articles as s. d Atter sale ^^b^^^^ ^^ ,.^^ and he delivered them to the ^f^^'^^^^^ A i ne of bill of sale I estiniat- All property has been sold and did no r.Uue %Um^ At t ,^^^ ^^^ ^ ed goods in bill ot sale at ^l oW vv e ^""^P^'^ " , , . .^ the serv ce of the wr-t up able to pay Morrison's debt at time l^ ^vas demandcxl nor itter tne ^^^^ .^^ ?o execution ; not in full. At that time -/;-;f «^ '%l Z. L David.son had a debts, most of which were good; required t""« ^*^. "^\^f.^:,ii,a knowledge of Morris- claim-about S600. Debts still outstanding (S";d\ 1 hu.k I ud ui o^.^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ on and the other claims at the time consent ^^^^J^i^r. the advertisement; IfiO ^ale advertised week I think or ten d; J^ con-»t \vui b ^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^,^ can't say how long. No rm>llection w at tun. ^^^^J ^^^^,^^,,, the s300 or $400. whether goods advertised before hither \.i ^^f':^^^'J -^ bill ot sale. 1 got no 1 had paid them out ot my own f""ds *.•(). ^ ^ ;\ . .session. Kept money in receipt from 'Jhipma.i or Davi.son. I 1 ad « ''^y Go'/ n me of the money from my the house for o^.r a year, .n a box in m f ' "^^ \^^ ;' ".^vanced, between 8200 and lather. Took no obligation tr.m my a he. toi ^^^^ V;^^.>^7 ^^ , /^^^.je for my repay- S:3(JU ; it was my earnings in different ^^'=^^«;, .,^^;. 'VJ. ^ ,^ (v,ges paid every Satur- ment. I have paid tor my clothes ; -^^e no Ing m «.• ax-^ J' .1^ ,^^^^ ^ ^. dav night; Home getting ^7, 88, «9 a week n Ho mU.^^^^^^^^^^^ any book. Can't tell 170 tVom business on account o wages. ^^"^J^^^ Ji^^ ^, had settlement ; about when my wages commenced. ^^'^f^^^^^'^V/ou. He vvas paving Falconer by instal- 11th Sept., '79 subject of wages hrst ^^-^^'^^^.^^^^^^^ "Notts renewed fi4m time nients in Sept., 1879. He gave Fa conei- notes to ^^^^'^ ^,^ ^^„,,,,a. The balance to time, all paid. Several times I took note. ^ ' '^ '^^ J ^^.^.^ ^^out time Falconer's of Falconer's claim paid m ^"^^^.^j;^^"-^] ^^ on m,Jie to pay my wag^incash. claim put in hands ot lawyer as I think. J'^Wj^j e matter over and concluded to let No statement of figure., ot salary ma le ; n e ta ku tn. n ^^ statement my wages go again.t their o.ll or board ; ha a 1 at at j^^ ^^.^^^ ^ ^^^^.^^^ mide of how uu.cii a year was to get. id not ui ^^^ thing. Can't state 180 I consented to take SlOOO tor the bala"C due mu n tu ^ fe^^^^,^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^^ how uuich of S1500 1. wages. Miand .. 'f'^^^;^''^,, ,,n„wed for board. Besides lar we went back t- ^-^'n>'«^^' ^-^^•^'';' ';' - Z^^'^';!.,, i ,uonth, house and premises waues, rent of place went n> maKe ^U> «l-;'>^- ,,/ . {n* ,f sale it was thrown in. Never $260 per annum. Wages not ui ^'^'deration o bill ^ ^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^^.^^^ .-5 to 'SO; rent was expected that I should pay rent tor " ; '^^^^'j,, "'" a.s. No agreement then for iVee. 1 was2;3 I5t:> Sept. '.9. ,^''i; ^'^^it'"^,^; ^l we had settlement in Sept., rent. NoMmig mentioned abmu exaU . ont o ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^ ^^^.^^ ^^^^^^^ '79, tlien we nu:,de up the rent at 8200. • " '^ , ^ ' ^^^.^,„i , ^^^.e and a small buihling rent at all till Sept.. '79. '^1'^' l>!-«!"^ ^ ';'^^7^\,, , .1 Use. 108 Agricola Street. 190 adjoining, and the bakery adjoining J' ; ^ ,^^^^^ , father. House completed liakerv l>usiues. carried on during tha pud ot>.a^s^.>^^^ > afterwards. I con- iu'08; groi.nd purchased m ^^ ,' "^'.^ ,^ ' 'l^, .,, ,,^ appointed to look after sidered the property only wortli *loOO J- ;\^ ^ •'^ ^j,^, s.^ttlement. My father was t,uildnu.. There was no rent ever .)aid me m al^.N-l ^i ^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^J^.^ ^^^^^ ^^^^ credited with nothing when ^^'^tleniti.t mau . anvthingfor repairs, guardian. He was a carpenter and built th.. o> ^c. Job ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^j^^ ^^^.^^^^ .^^ No-epairs were put on since ''"'Id^.u. M ; t -^^-^ > j^^,.^ ,,^il, the l,al.ery als .. bill of sale. 1 built the «tore.ix.jni~L.ur e t m^^ it ^^ agreement in writing Can't give .he figures of either V^-'^';'\'^%^,^'Z\Xt Hr.st; store-room afterwards. 200 in regard to building store house ^"'d b; ;«^\: J; House in building society ; payments Cant gi/e the dales oi buildur^; \.iiuni u v MWi '^^ 6. n.ade every month ; over £700 repaid to Building |:^:^J-„,J,,]^t^:;;Un a'i^v i.' earned the moi.ey. I made all the paymen s ^^ [ ^^^^f >^; f, ^'.nev to pay the dues atr-nces. Property in.tri Society in 6/ Got 7 nh.^^^^^^^^^ durhi- '67 .ind-'CS iarne.l some of the Building Socie y. Earned it {"^liferent wa>s n n d< ^^ ,^,^ „,oney hy teaching niusie, writing 1 did. ^ept o accou^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Aboul $320 paid Tor lot to Sir Wm. Young J, P*' f^„;^;^"'ir"f:ther wus not paving me of Building Society ; J§80 my own money I had ^y"" iVecfiii « h monev to pav the ^^^Slvdlf^^^st^'^iTh^^ writing essons besides. I l''^^/^.^' ^^^Y^ ^Z.Mt «:00 per annum a fair rental. He clkin. against n,y ''^;i^ ^J!^;^f^!;'^'::^;„,,, it ....li.ed $800. f;:::S :mo;lVi;rttt ?hun, m «-,■;. ,..„„,.. be reduced t„ .200. Plaintiff rests. M,i.THon m Suith, tendered. Signature of VVilkin,s as Judgnien B,,,A 7 p..« .^^^^^^ Ki„i „y,„,, recei>ed, objected to as irrelevant. '^''^'' W ;,15h\^)BI e -Olerk in office of the Cler. County Court. I produce record taken Waltkr. Noble. -^^^"^ . ,^ ^ ^ 'SO. in handwriting of clerk. It was from hies ot Uurt. M e o t »^;''^.:J;^/;/smH. in County Court. Record tendered, .JZ^^F q^^r^c^nrhi^Lviirnot of sa,.e Judgment as that in writ; (hearing ''''l':t^jr::t^:^'^^''^^ Augustas, year; took place i^iday Tame. f"f ' ;;"^;^J,,, before the sale ; sale al Smith's Bakery, corner Agncola and 2:ird August. L sa\. th. book »^f"»V,, ,^ Pl.,intiff ■ Plaintiflf y <>ther parties. Sheriff received t^om sale al 51.07 and l^l^'V^tlll debited with It plaintiffs authority. Objected. 250 ^--«-^': -"twilHw u^ lo I'cU ;lm >aiisheritl Amount ^f sale generally ...a^'^lSlltt^m.^^^ Something was paid to Sheritt; Can t say •"" r;;;!unt sale^ book produced. Plaintiffs signature to account sale proved. Object- el; tendered; rec.'ived subject to objeetum. A mmmf^m^mmmH ^i,.^u ,MM,jm-^myt /-( 1 \T I ,,.f W M * Smith. -18.02. TFrit praecipe, bill costs, ii came and had conversation with uie twice; one-' also. Plaintiff said - -e need not press his laMi^ week. I said it would be all right if he wouh i ■ cash. In consecpier.ee of Plaintiifs promise 1 li -i:^ in hands of iny attorney,Plaintiff came and aske.! n made. I told him that as he had deceived m . 1 Graham's hands and would make no an-aiigeinenl . thing ; he had bill of sale. I told lum bill <.l s:,le ■> I had had bill of sale I wouhl not have s , d g .-^ Cnm Examwed.-lhiye distinct recollectiou oi ■■ versation 1st week June ; at second couversat. .n h paid u« cash in his dealings. Never exanu.H 1 > ■ Ex.cution tendered and receive. -1- til .^H e_aorsemeut admitted, (executu.n marked (..) ^ Waltkk Noble recalled.--- pnn-^^^^ I Bill of cost, signed by M.l.WilkiusMe^^.. A. M tendered and received. J/arked L. M. .X ^-Sheriff BELL.-Ex.x-ution received bv -■ ^ ceive4^ m of money, S154.50 ; received i bet. c,. : 'reate, p trt frcmi my deputy, llanulton; ";'""; r ^ CrL Examh>e in T)9 or '70-bakerv built. Mv w.n-k came to *-<•■• I h-u iiothi^^K^ to do with the son in the matter; M;,: otu!e property. William Smith paid me the in. young man; studying law. B-^^';'>^M>- JX - ;' lo'tkm.w when money was pod m •• 1-h..i.1'.' 0J-e;ved;(ol>jected to) tiled 2Ut!i June Defeiidaiit rests- In rebuttal. Pla'NTIFF recalled.--My mouex Building Society. ^^^ ^_^^^^_^.^, , ,,^,„, Buildiog .S')ciety ; received it 12th ... "i-r "^Xlh'd'^ tlds adl^uH^e myself. " I think I got it through my guardian. 200 270 77; recov i AuLi;..'80; under execution I re- ,rd iiud end of Augu.st ; received iivself ; Hamilton acted for i:ie. ,it bakery, building baker's oven, 1 dill work for father, Win. Smith. ,,,) knowledge of him as the owner i>t;ilment. I sued William Smuh .. iiises ; won't swer.r as to his age; ,\ >• ; covers a. good deal of ground ; M ilaNvlev r.s' Smith tendered and re- i .,rk"d(j., J. W. J. 280 290 piid for w.ii-k oil bakery ; got an advance from D ^:;:;i;:n a.iZlt:;ra,iid wa. diseha^-.^^ VV.G.HAMn;T(.N-lvcc. eu^ol. ,1- u^ ask deputy sheriff where he got the b >ftb' case Gro.s. E^armued-l had contereue. with i^ kjio^^ i> nothiuii with the goods e.sc sell any goods. I Uul notuu. .'mY^ clerk. J/r. Tveinaine proposes to • i >iiey. I think that part of Plaintiff's .nilVs Attorney after levy. I did not pt what Tremaiue cmsented to; paper 300 It was after the sale. i-J,;Sne.l IV.„n T,-.,,,,.!,-.. ».ne .luy o. .l,,v nlH.- sU,- by .SI.ukI *l"'«;^;"^.;'',^,'i';;,'ip.HK.,-w.» n.,., two ,1.;,- :,lt.- «K., cu.'t ,iK«k posilively. p_ S:;lrt„.or, .a. ,..■ C-v. .7., .V,.nl. eo. to c.,nt.,dict V^^m. Rule P tendered. „ , „r Court --ranted in 1800. on application of James \ *: 6ro«« ExanL',l-U. Nutting acted an deputy many .> eais. Ki-cxn tu , j Dei'endaiit verits. ^ , ^ i k,. „,l,1iiuT nlea leave and license of Attorney -General moves for leave to amend by adding pica, le.iv^. Plaintift'. . , ^ , r ,^ Bigby objects. Cause tried, fraud or no fraud. I allow the amendment. Graham for non-suit. .,,,,., -ii p oo1» Ti'vnrPRs wae"-on not covered by Property not identified with that in bill of sale, f ^Fe«« waggon bill of sale. Horses not identified ; bread waggon not identihed. debt, half of which was b.rred by Stat, of ^""J i^i^f^^.i^^^^j^; .^ ,"„ to wait, and in the contract. 5th, right would be in guardian, ^raud gettm^^^ month registering bill of sale. No conversion. Sheritt only tiein creu had procured from Shand. Tremaine. ]2() .JO'J No. 3. Smith is Bfli -Action against Sheriff for conversion. The plaintiff j:!;^'"^ jitle to the op ty under f bill ot "ale made by William H^ ^mi^'i, t - - -^ ;>^ - ^ 1-- "Sf^X y rge\L ..iiith, his -^^tednt. Sept^^ ;!;^:xre;^:;;;:ir:^i:^ or or rent, or both, but finally settled that it was tor lU years rent at 8 '^y^^^^^ im bv Us ither vhich, on a settlement they had agreed to lump at gloOO. lie 1 am- ium oy nis lainci, yin^^ became possessed of a lot ot land for tiff ola,„„ '!';>'-;;/'« ''"j\!^JUVee«ted^^^ buildings wi-l, „K,ne.v l,.„.v.,w,.,l from i tedding S-ietv m' «l,ich "rmni^e. !,i«.M,er .nrt ra,,,ily. i.-luding n,s.U, 7,''ickd on .f^u:, and 'in whiol, hi, f«tl---;-,'^ -^'^g^r'totn^lt'L ve '.ai.a I to \i.\j tnc monuu^ uu^ „„„;n^t creditors there vv-as no consideratum tor the rectnessot this story,! think ^^ '^^.fS^^*^^^^^^^ to be fraudu- bill of sale, and theretore as against them the ^^^^ *^^ ^^S, , mj j evidence of lent. Being a minor, all his -nungs belonged to his f^he • J^^^^^^^;.^^^^ ^,„^ either expressed or implied ''^;^f^2^>^^^^^,y that belonged to his father to liis «''»>«7U^-" V'''""K;v''«^^ t^X^s^nl r ght to charge the fiuher tor the use in the purchase ot property, n « S^|^ J^^ '^^ll- and we have these additional tacts : of property in tact purchased ^^'^ J^,^^? 7" "\;,";^l3es together as their c.mimou house ; that the father, son and ;;";; >;/^Xf uij^^a^ir 1^^^^^ rent from the father 350 that the guardntu ot the plaint ft "l^^^^J^^^l^^^^ ^^ .^q contracted for the building of a in the mtcM-est ot his ^vard tlmt ^^^ J^^^ /^ /^^^^ ^now the plaintiff in the matte^; U:^trf J h^rSr^i tSi^on ?ie 1 was suedlbv the balan^, ^ffered that t''\ '\;^';, ";^ V^,t ,^3ttin.v up the plea that the property oelonged to his son, judgment by detault ^^ \thout «at n "11^ ^^ ^.^ e after his coming of age . and lastly, that the plaintiff him el allowed ^^^^ ^^p^ . -fj- {^^^^^^ ^liat his monev ii#- '.iiS^l':''*Mt»----f-'- **■* express cj I'oundatioii Where th* the hiw V furnirthed same way an expres from thos of age, at iiihhes no of the ph and inarb gave liis < to re(iuir( in its ent Exc( menticne Phiintiff the fact 1 I til the good Kiles sig Sheriff ] ivmount I Tht The rec( receptio the docl' that the of ^rhic aside on the face record, shows 1 V.H. Win (B) is g for the party ti ■well as Sheriff into till a sulhc Sherifl leii'alit' Ji T-IA-X To Ar( Ilalifa Court evpre.s contract, and if lhe.v was no liahilit v t Lat cuuW ;-'-;» '^ '^ ,,,.,itors. ^ ^Sulation tor ^ ccnsideratiun that wonl 'U; -^^j .^^^ 1 ,^^t i^v^^with f.ui,arent ■ Wh.re tl.o parent goes tc, live; w.th a clnh ad 1 .n . . m ^^^^^^.^^ ^^^ „eceHHar.es the huv will '^^^^Vh'^^^V^-^'^^''^,'^}\'%X \^^^ nithorin the furnished by either parent or child The ^^\';'^''^^''^P^^^^^ tor that period without Hanie way al'ter his majority would d^;^'- ^nn IVom reccmn v^^^ ^^^ ^l^ ^^^ ^.^.^^^^^^ an express contract to that efleet. The re a lo btiwt ^^^,^^^ ^^.^ ^^^^^^^^^^ from ihose with a stranger, ^^^ services rendeedy ^ «"" "^ j.,^ ,ompensation, fur- of age, and while residing with "« /^^^her w thou any^a^^^^^^^^^^^ 3-^,, „i>shes no claim that can be enforced at law, while he ma> ad urc ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ment Plai ^^'"^ I tliink that the evidence of ilf^^}^^^';^V y'^^^.^f I"; \-l :;;;;;; i;c;ethe^^^ with the account the goods except by the consent ot the Pauntitt s ^l.^^^^J J V^'Jj ,,itli 5;l--)4.57 paid 'ales si.nied bv Plaintiff in which he ^Howcd himselt to be d luted w 1^^^^ S erill Bell affords evidence that the plaintiff consented to the bhciilt a mmnt on account of the ex^cutioiUie held Mc. n^^ - bni h ^^ ^^^.^^^ The defendant j.istified the taking ""^ «^ "" "^^' ^'^ ./.^ ,laintiiV, objected to the , The record and execution were tendered f ;:-^.;f ^>^;" '^ . Celf ami ditfered from recepti.m of the record on ^ -^ ^vounds thaU -- ^^ -^^^^^ ^,, ,,,,,tion the docket of udgvnent produced. TJie recoi W^^ ^of costs was proved, the amount that the amount .. the costs were not tilled n ^ V^,^^^^ ^^^^ ^ ^ , „,ui be loth to set 390 of which corresponded with the ^J""""^ !^^^^^^'*J " , '';4^i\ ;;e I proceedin under it, in aside on account of a mere clerical omission ""^f i^^'f/ : V Tmb-e's order to amend a Uie tace of the lact that iti-pen to either i^rtp. to obbuw.^ or- ^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^ record, and also in view ot the rule HT., 1^;^:;; ^^^^^^^ ^ But if the case of Bepy .hows that the English Courts do not ^^^^ • IpI Is t^' coim with some decisionsiu the ..s. Windham, 02, B. N.S., S 06, which I ^^^""t ^e^n^^^^^^^^ Justitication (B) is g:.od law. The production ot the writ "'t. ^^.^^"^^'A" ;;,' "^^ oyg N E. is that the ibr thJ-Sherifl- The rule as laid down in ' J^i;!;;' j^^' 1^^ judgm^it in pleading as partv to the suit justifying under <'-«f \.P^-""'^% "^^^^^^^^^ ,vrit ; and Wasson on ^vell as the writ, but that it s enough 1%.^!'^^^^^,^, Jl'^J^^^^^^^ wr^t without enquiry Sheriff, p. 53, lays it down that the Sh.rit ^^^T^^^^^^uM and that the writ is iuu. the regularity of the proceedings ^^liereon tha. w t ^ 101 ^ ^^^ ^^^^ a suihcient justitication to the Shen t in an action ot ^; Z^^'^^;^^^ ^.^ ^^,,^i,,^ their Sheriff is a ministerial othcer m the execution ot Avut. and is leualitv. Judgment for the defendant. 400 (L. S.) No. 4. ....... Victoria, iDy the Graw of God, &c. To Arcldbahl Lawson, Ensure, a Cormier for the Couvty of Halifax, &r. : Slit -U Sll.fik'x'lwi'thSt^nlia; after the service of thi.wr.t, at the .utt of Geot-^e II. B ii wmnwtjiwpi' ■»"•«•>»«.« Smith, the the i)hiiiiti( Hh'igh, ojie two bread ' Alao, I ftat cnrt o mare, two Ami t IsHueil KuEi). .I.T oc Take at Ualilax To the lie att i Noti( days ul'tei lioevtv to 1 aec llali HI^Xj We Hal To the ] A iia-l: Th tiff's l.'>intifr» g...«l,., tlmti- to «,,,■: ''"=''.' 'vo el .hk-^., <<>m%Mh<:y ^llur.., OO-ON^TT COTJI^T, K^LIFJ^X, 18SO. SMITH r.s. BKLL. Ta.e notice o. t.i.l in the above cau. .. U. .ivst .;y .>f jj;;: --/E:';^:^;;;::- at Halifax, or m soon after as this honoraMe ^onit^ ^'I'-^H To the tk'femlaiit ur his ( ' '- " Attorney of rUtintitl. attornev. 1 ^^B .SMITH *>. liKLL. N,.tl... U ,...„, she,, .l,at ir tW ,Me,,,„|nt ,1.. - JJl^-j-'j^J^™;; t^l^^J'-^ ,l,,« ..rh.i- the period speeilied m the writ ten l i.. .> -* ai.in^ l-:-.;'; Jo ,t,.R'', ae,-,,,,!. „„a l.,«oed ,.» vo.,,.,,™.!,- ;,,.-. ^ __^ ^^ ^^ ,^, ^^^_ ^_^^^^ " ~ Attorney of Phiintill. 1 ...e,t service of this writ and acknowledge to have received a ^^;y th--K^ Halifax, Sept. IT, ^■-^^" ^" No. 5 IN THE COUNTY COURT, 1880. 430 h:.a.XjIFj?^2C, SB. We aunear hn- tiie Defendant herein. lialilUx. September U)th. IhSO. , Cause— 5 Co the Plaintitl'or his ) Attornev. ) GKoiKii: H. Smith, Plaintiff". ^ .loSKi'ii llv.iA; Defendant. Thompson & Graham. Defendant's A^'-ineys. 440 I-IA-LIIP^X, SS. IX THE t OUJiTV COIRT, 1S80. (li-.oudF. H. Smith. riaintiff. Cause— I !;^- ^ . 1 , JosKi'H Bell, Detendant. 450 tift"s declaration (first sug-estuig ^'if . ,; ^.^..j,^.,., therein alleged, or any of them. Ltiou) says, that ho didnot.auuut o^-v.mees^^^^ Uiedetbndant'.ays that before 2nd. And lor a second plea (Miggtsun^ the ullug^'tl ou« Edwa reoted to t Sheriff tin prwiiu't, li huiuhed a fees, vvhicl perMOiiiil iJ and th« « heiiij; tlie lendiiut,a mt'iitioiiei WUli'im I said, for t the alU'g< ird. the allc}^' one Kdw! reeoverei suit -, and Edward again si ' wher.'hy lauds I. V be paid i th;rtv-rt^ rtaiil wrii pLM-ty ol" writ no Sheriff being si in the ] II. Sniii purpose conver? 4tl f'aid gO( 01 plainti be \ one 'L\'. the 1> Ual t( me 1 do I: H. Sii Sched goods said ( I, the ■atftfaaWMMMK tUc ullegcl conv..«iou ana t-'^j^-^^^j;;^; ^;;,^\, Ilalili, a writ .f --';;i- ,! Ij on.' Edward Mornwm aued out ot "'« ^"""V "^...,,,.,,,.1,.. the Queen .uir.inaiuU-ilt.o s..ia t.. to the Sheriff of the Cmity ot "">'<'^^' 7'^'' J,.. vviUiam II. Smith, w.tmu h.s 4i)l) ^:ir ff th^ ^^«-«l^ ->"^^^^^^' '"'"^^ "' "i'^^i-^r r u ,^ :i^« Wward Morrison on. ^ v'itt e «h,mld ol^une to he paid and -^^ f ,,,,^^" .^ t.^tiHiy hin.seUior hi. - vn n u ed and thuty-Huvon doUars an.» -" ^^^V I ^ , t the naid Sheriff to levy on .. ie8 which.aid writ waHduy endorsed w.td^^ ^^^,^^,^,^^ ,,,„! Iuh rwn tee« ' 1 . .. .M»rtv of the ^'u d WiUiam H. >Miitli, tor uic .IclViu Uuit. as and ■o,„Uut,a. anJ LciuB »...:, Shc-nna»aU.e»ul, ^^^ 'J" , ,|,^. ,„.„|,o,tv _^1 th. »al.l William ^i-^<>"'^'''"'\'^::^^^^Z^yLM..c<.Au,^« ,„,i.,lu»«l...«"a,»h,cl ... Slid for the purpose ot le\\ing uit muuc^ the alU-ed co.iversion and trespasses. .,,..„„.,ii„.r as atoreaaid) ^^ ■ 'l'*''^* ^'^'i'^^;-' l.',hvaia Moni*.,! sMca -.ml..! *;","' I'", ,,1,.. SIutUT "'' tlw Oanitv ..1 1 allhix, „; .i.ril. »a>a William 11. «""'l'- '''''••f ;\ '/'.'^,| sWnlT tlmtof tho g....a«, chattuW, ", u . . iiieO'J.-oii cMumanav.l the aa a ?'":""■. ),„ ^l,,,,, a "luse to IS" be paid and sati.lied unto th. sud ^^^^Y" , •^' Vatj. V himself for his own l-^s, vh.eh tlr • v-s.ven dollars and two cents, and al: t. a .. ^^ ^j^^ ^^^.^.^^^, I ^3 y;.t.it'a^;ri^s'p,^iSHi^ purpose of levyu.-, the mune> so .lutcti conver>ion and trespass. .Ue defendant (su--esting as aloresa.d) sa> s, tUat ti c hc'vond the inrisdietion of this Court. TuoMl'SON & CxKAHAM, 'L\; the Phiintiff ov his ^ Atlo.ney. > I'SON Ci vxn.Aii.i..'i, Detendant's Attorneys. Exhibit <\., J- W. J. -u the County • Know all men hv these P'-^^^'^^^'f ,;.:;J2^tn cJ^^Il^O oflaw^J^n^ J!? ^^ada o Ualifa'C, master baker, in c„.-.sideration ot ^\^/^ "^ !^,^.i,ter-at-Law, the rece.pt whereot , ne id by (leor.n. 11, S.nith, ot the ^^'%^^;^;^r.,^t over unto the «ud George i aolVelo •u-knowle.lge. do grant, ^^^'^^''^i.Py .nd effects mentioned in the lL8mitb,-'aU ami slnguh.r tl- p-^^^}-^^;,^'^^?^ ^o hold all and singular the said Schedule hereunto annexed marked A ^^^'"^^^ ^^ parcel thereof uno am he goods, chattels, property and ellects, • "f ^^^^ J^.^ ^„a assigns forever, so that neithe ^aid George II. Smith, ^^ V'^'^f^^^^X^-^ >-«' ^^"^^ "^>' "'"'' '"^' "° l_^t]ic s:.id William H. Smith, nor an) otliei pti •300 I MW J" 'S wm .(^!VS,.=.%S!!^Sti* ■J.-mSL'^^^-f^-^ 12 _^_^^j, :.W ^ w U "Uu- or^e.naud at any time or tun- h. .a u too^ , ^ ^^^^^^^^^ 1l Snilth tovhia^selt- hi. executors and a.l-nuj^ ,, ,.d do... '(^r ::;<;. dln^nii-ators anil assigns, P-vjd.d t nv t'- -'^,^,,^ ,, ^^^m) with h.v- ^ liaud shall tndy pay unto ^1- -f ^ :-;(-^",,^ ' llc^ pvesents t he vo.d, othev.^e f,! interest thereon ru one ye.r t.oni thi. date, , . .-n to remain in full tb.re and e lee . thisllth day of Septemher, xbK>. As witness mv hand and seal at ll.uaax, IN Si..ned. sealed and deliverrd in presence ot > ^^.^^^ , ^y„j,_,,, H. bMlTH. oJ) Agnes G. Smith. 5 schedule A within referred to. ^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^_^^^_ stai.a, one buxs violin, one «.vu,, h«u| 1. . - ^ ' ,^„„ ,,.,„e, tw-lvo oh.o,., ..iltlotli oucstovc, oiif nig. nu.oinctmL^, lui I j, '"' ' "111 oil clo.l,. »r„.,.. o"v 1-n »<>"•« "";' l ;■,,„,,,„,„, „„o l,nv..v,.. one l>.;-;H»,one boo - (all eall,e. an.l slip.. ...^i.e. on ■"■•;■-,;-'„;,„,„, i,l,t eliah-n.; n,,. three sett. ;>•;/.■;..».— doe l—A'j.-nesT. Smith. i ci.,,! En!u.sedUtU.Iuly, 1S8». 11 oO entered and hied ■)40 1 Horse Hirry ((Jientles) 1 do Miiiv CMe( arthy) 1 Express Wiiggon ' Leahy) 1 Bread Waggon t xMoir .^(^).) ■ [ dollars 'Adams- 1 lot Rope i.MoMt) I Sett Express Harne>s (,^uUn an Exhibit B., J. W. J. llauiilton, J.B. do do do do do ilo .1 . li . J.B., J.B., J. IV, J. li., J. B., $3o.00 37.00 31.50 3000 2.80 40 7.50 §144.20 •"T* ! Ge( ^.^^ of an C! fe( or le ft ileuaett) 13 Brought iomar<1 Iluiuilton J. B., ^114.20 ■> Oi Amount paid Sherifrn54.50. , , „ .;initli > Monday, Geo.-'^e R. Young, to George H. Smith. Date, l-iOtli April, 1867. Consideration $S20.0<>. ^^ ^i^.^t certain lot, piece c-' pare . Deneription. All the B^wtheni moiety or Ml>artm^^ 'X^'';?!^^" " of land in^^oung'.divisicn of ^^^^^^^^^^^ dated Oct. l«t 18G3 and «aid division prepared by John B. ^^""p^'^-^* ^ Sch nlun i» to be recorded m the office ot Registry oi l at'ty-t'^ir teet Ironi t^^ thewest .ide line of ^^^^;}\^!^^:X^:^:iC^lt^^^ Agricola Street ..th \»1 to ^he north of the angle formed b> the V-^'^*^"',. , .„uh said Oharlw Street, U4 feet, to the place of beginnuig- . ,0 - n«.n; 40G Registered I8th June, 180*, Bo«)k lo^, page 4U0. »» Debt, Entries in the County Court, August, ISSQ { E»WARl> MoitRISON. IS.Oti ^ Tliwnpsoit ;if«* .1 • 1 V,Uv.,ril Mo. "5a<>'. and fiie said Say. «otbh,g t«tw«.n he »> ? "i net'™ doU.r. *ss... ..^^X:^=E:-^X:x Reed 1 itii Au „ , iam H. SmitA, ibr one ^^"-^'•f.jl^i^^^^ a M >u-i;on recove. Therefore, it i. considered that the ^f/^ ^^J^,, hundred and g./8« .gainst the said William H.Smitlitl..aid^^c 1^ ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^. ')*:»() Ex. I4tb Aug., "80. his casts ot suit. ^^^ I.WILKINS. tTlerk. Uth August, 1880. JuikMue nt Book 7, page 325. Exhibit^, J- W.J. .^ ,t i, u..,..,! tUa, n„ objeeuou will ''^.tok""*" '^"^ijf^^^f^^/^^^^^ ^! To firm of Suinmc partic ; 1880 Feby. ' Mar. ] 1880. Mar. 1 TheP And t that t and n Thom: HAL Debt Costi Ex^ ^! -,> ^^» 14 Exhibit F., J. W. J. On the 28th day of July, A. , ISsO. To Wit.-Edward Morrison, tradmg and doing business under the name, ^'.^ [^ '|"'|j. firm of E. Morrison & Co., by Tliompsun & Graham his attorneys, sued ..a vv Summc^^ag'^nst William a Smith,'of the City and County ot Halitax, B.k... uuU the partit 1 .innexed,as follows: 1880 Febv 25 To 30 barrels Perth Flour @ $6.85, Mar 17. " 6 " Shootly " 7.00, 1 8S0 CR- Mar."l7. By Cash 873.00, April 21, C^ash $32.50, May 20, Cash S25.00 , 010 $205.50 4:>..00 ^217.50 130.50 To interest on balance,' To amount due under Cmnmon Counts, 5^117.00 2.00 8119.00 G20 SI 11). 00 one hundred The Plaintiff also claims interest on S117.00 from the date of the Writ until ^;^l^^^^ ind the said William H. Smith hath not appeared tliereto Theretore i^.ouMducd that the said Edward Morrison recover against the said William H. femitn and nin eteen dollars, together with s for Costs ot buit.^ Thompson & Gkaham, ^ ) Attorneys of Plaintift. ^ Filed 14th August, 1880. ' 630 HALIFAX, SS [Seal.] 640 Debt, Costs, 1^; Exhibit G., J. W. J. VICrOEIA, hn the qmceofCrOD, of the United Kingdom 'f (^rn'olBntahi and Ireland, QUEEN, Defender of the faith, and of the Indvd Uturch of hmjland and Ireland, on Earth the Supreme Head.] To the Sheriff of our County of Halilax, or to any other of our Sheritl's: Whereas Edward Morrison by consideration of our Justices ot our County Court, at Halifax, on ^le 14th day of August re;^overed Judgment against iVillium H. Smith for the sum of one lunulred aiid nineteen dollars debt or damage, and the sum ot eighteen d.^lais ana two cents costs of suit, as appears to us of /Record, whe.oot ^^^^'^^^ remains to be done. We command yen theretore, that ot the Goo s Chattels Lands, or Tenements of the said William H Smith Ythin vour precinct you cause to be paid and salisHed unto the said hdw=u satisfv yourself for your own fees; and tor want .- .ods, . naueis, llini;, or Tenements of the said Willia.n H. Smith to be by him shown unto you, or found within your precinct, to the acceptance of • the siu Ed^vard Morrison to satisfy the sums aforesaid, we command vou o take the body of the said William H. Smith and commit unto on, nio.oo 18.02 §137.02 1.00 ■W^ JAM Gaol in sums al Morriso return ( date he Thomps M H. Snii Reed. 1 E. &( . Al HAL [1 I 15 Gaol in Halifax and detain in your custody withinlour said Gaol 'J^^'til he pay tlie mU sums above mentioned, with your fee., or that he be discharged .^^ ^^'^ «7^^^ ™^[,e Morrison the Creditor or otherwise, according to hvw Whereot tail "« ' ^^ make^ due return of this Writ unto our said County Court at Halifax, within sixty days tro.n the date hereof. I.«:iued this 14th day of August, A. D., 1880. Thompson & Guaham, ^ > Attorneys of Plaintiff'. S i\I. I. WILKINS, Clerk. 660 [ENDORSEMENT] G. J. W. J. 789^ L. 7, 325. §mmi^ ^m\xi, gnlilnjc, Jl^f . Morrison vs. Smith. Execution. Mr SiiERiFF,-Please levy en the personal property of the within named William H Smith for the within amount and your own fees, and tor want thereot Ui n. oiiiit.i lui rrti/AVTUsinv Xr riPAHAM Attornevs o! Reed. 14th August, 1880. xke his body. 670 U your uvvii H.-CB, tiiiu iw. "i..../ - . •/ THOMl'SON & GiiAHAM, Attorneys of Plaintitt. Exhibit J., J. ^^^. J. Account sales, Bakers effects, sold by Jam.-sShand, for acct. of Geo. H. Smith, Esq. Gross amount of sale Ohakges. To commission 5 percent, " A(ivortiMng, 2 s(i., ") ins., 2 pa. '■ Labor at sale and delivery. Dr. To paid Slierift''s bill, "■ Teaming, McLean, $14.08 8. ^154.57 1.00 §281.52 24.08 $257.44 155.57 680 E. & 0. E. Aug. 30, 1880. Aug. 30, 1 880. $101.87 JAMES SHAND. Endorsed received payment, ,„,^„ GEO. H. SMITH. 690 No. 7897. Exhibits J. NV. J. HALIFAX SS. VICTORIA, /»/ 1l>e (hare of GOD, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Q UEEN, Dejender of the Faith, etc. To the Sheriff" of Halifax or any other of our Sheri^ls : FT S 1 We command vou to Summon William H. Smith, of the City and ^ ' Cou my otHdifax,' Baker, herein after called the defendant, to appear n U^ (Jounty CouA. at Halifax, within ten days after the service ot tlus W It the -Ldt of Edward Morrison, trading and doing bus-ss under the ivin.e style and iirm of E. J/ornson & Co., hereinaiter called tlie Phi S who av-s that the said Defendant is indebted to him for money Jlalfi.; the said Deiendant to tl. said Pla^^^ delivered by the Plaintiff to the Detendant al his '"eq"^^^- "a"\'~\ worK done and materials provided ly the Plaintiff for the Defendant at --. •aa*- ■■.-«s*'riksyriS£i^ .'/a^^' &W':''f^i^^^^^ 1880. 1880. his request. And for money received by the Defendant for the uae of the Plaintiff. And for money found to be due from the Defendant to the Phiintift, on an Accimnt stated be- tween them. And for interest upon money of the Phiir.tilV lield by the Detendeut ana forborne to him by the Plaintitl for a long time now ehipsed. And he claims Two Hundred Dollars. Issued this 28th day of July, A. D., 1880. Thompson & Gkaham, i M. I. NMLKlJNb, 1880. Attorneys of Plaint ift". 5 Clerk. 710 The following are the particulars of the Plain tiff^s claim : — Feby. 25. To 30 bbls. " Perth " Flour, @ $6.85, Mar. 17. " 6 " " ShooUy" " " 7.00. 1880. Cu. Mar. 17. By Cash 873, April 21, Cash $32, Cash 825, To Interest on balance, Jj^205.50 42.00 $247.50 130.50 117.00 720 2.00 8119.00 8119.00 To amount due under Common Counts, Default 14 April, 1H80. SHERIFF'S RETURN. I served a copy of this Writ on the within named defendant on the 28th day oi •^"'>^' ^^^^- JOSEPH BELL, Sheriff. 730 Exhibit M., J. W. J. its mmu ©oiffiiJi: co^hhif, mm. Praecipe for summons for Edward Morrison trading and doing business under the name, style and Hrm of E. Morri.son & Co., against William H. Smith, of the Oity and County of Halifax, Baker. Writ issued 27th day ot July, A. D., 1880. Returnable ten days. Particuhirs $119.00. -.q ^*''"" '■^^^" TiioMi'SON & Graham, Plaintiff's Attorneys. ■BHMWWWIiW MORR SMITI 5( 5( 2( ] HorU 1872. that built that do all work was 1 didr the > raaki DesI Bule MORRISON va. SMITH. ( 17 Exhibit N. 12>r COTJIsTT"^ 00"OI^T. Plain tifl"»Cu8ta on defiiuU. iZetainer and lettor, Warrant and p'pe., 50 Writ and (.'opifs. 50 Declar. and (lopicM, 25 Notice lo appear and (Copies, 25 " of trial and 20 Particiilairt and (Jopie«, Br'et and Copy, Term lee, Record and Eng. Bill of Costs, Sheriff's fees, Prothoiiotarv'rf fees.j .liirv fet!, liibrary Stamp, (Jrier. Postage, 00 2.50 25 25 27 25 Allowed. 750 |3.00 .60 2.00 2.00 1.25 1.25 80 1.50 l.OU 1.00 1.00 $15.40 760 4.3? 110.72 1.70 $18.02 M. I. WILKINS, Clerk. 770 Exhibit O. rABSTRACT.) Record of a Judgment in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia. Suit, Frederick W. Horley, Plaintiff, wcrv/w William H. Smith, Baker, Defendant. Writ isau i 2nd xMarch, 1872. Action on the couxmon counts. Pleas— 1st, never indebted ; 2nd, payment; 3rd, that Plaintiff agreed witli Defendant to construct an oven for Defendant for Jj}200, to be built of the best tile, and best brick, and flue to be carried to proper height for dratt ; that Plaintiff also agreed to furnish a boiler to be built in at the side of the oven and to do all necessary iron work in connection therewith, and tv remove any unsatisfactory work or materials . that the oven and work were unsatisfactory and useless, and Plaintiff was notified to remove and rebuild bu^ had neglected and refused to do so; that Plaintiff did not perform his agreement and used bad workmanship and materials which rendered the work usele.ss and put Defendant to expense. 4th, plea of set-oft. Order to amend by making the suit a Declarution cause. Rule of reference, 4th November, 1873, to L. W. DesBarres. Award by DesBarres, 15th December, 1873, in lavor di Plaintiff for $7o.05. Bule nisi to set aside award and rule discharging such rule nm. Exhibit P. 700 HA-LUPA-X, SS. - In the matter of the Estate of George H. Smith. On reading the rule nisi granted herein to a\\o\v the account rendered by George McKenzie, the Trustee in the said Estate, and to dischargo i,u« said George McKenzie from the trust in the said estate and the report of tiie Master of this Court, made on the said account of the Trustee,— It is ordered that the said account as reported and aniended by the said Master be allowed and passed, and that the said George McKenzie be dis- charged from his trust in the said Estate. It is also ordered that the balance of twenty- eight dollars and fifty-two cents, reported by the Master as due to the said George Mc- Kenzie, be paid to him out of the estate of the said George H. Smith, together ^ith his costs herein to be taxed. Dated 25th April, A. D., 1869. BY THE COURT. J. W. NUTTING, Prothonotary. 800