^ 
 
 ^^, 
 
 r2^ 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 ■ii ta 12.2 
 
 l» U2.0 
 
 US 
 
 us 
 
 i; 
 
 ii4 
 
 11-25 i 1.4 
 
 71 
 
 W 
 
 /: 
 
 
 
 V 
 
 i? 
 
 / 
 
 s 
 
 ItetDgraphic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WOST MAIN STRIET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14S8U 
 
 (716)S72-4S03 
 
\<^.4l 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICIViH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical IMicroreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 Couverture endommagie 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie et/ou pellicul6e 
 
 I I Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured Ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 ReliA avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La re liure serr6e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion ie long de la marge intirieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout6es 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte. 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 film^es. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires: : -> 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a it^ possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la methods normaie de filmage 
 sont indiquts ci-dessous. 
 
 I I Coloured pages/ 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 • 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film^ au taux de rMuction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagies 
 
 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaur^es et/ou pelliculdes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d^colordes, tachet6es ou piqudes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d6tach6es 
 
 The 
 toll 
 
 The 
 post 
 ofti 
 film 
 
 Orig 
 
 bagi 
 
 the 
 
 sion 
 
 oth( 
 
 first 
 
 sion 
 
 oril 
 
 rri Showthrough/ 
 
 Transparence .v. 
 
 Quality of print varies/ 
 Qualit^ inigale de I'improssion 
 
 includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel supplimentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponibie 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure. 
 etc., ont 6t6 film6es A nouveau de fapon A 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 The 
 shal 
 TINI 
 whi( 
 
 Mar 
 diffi 
 entii 
 begi 
 right 
 reqt 
 metl 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 
 
 
 16X 
 
 
 
 
 20X 
 
 
 
 
 24X 
 
 
 
 
 28X 
 
 
 
 
 32X 
 
 
e 
 
 itails 
 18 du 
 nodifier 
 ir une 
 ilmage 
 
 IS 
 
 The copy filmed here hee been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 Douglas Library 
 Queen's University 
 
 The Images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in Iceeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Original copies In printed peper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the bacic cover when appropriate. All 
 other originel copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first psge with a printed or Illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated Impression. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol — ^> (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol y (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 L'exempiaire filmt fut reproduit grice A la 
 ginirosit* de: 
 
 Douglas Library 
 Queen's University 
 
 Les images sulvantes ont tt€ reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetA de i'exemplaire film*, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est ImprlmAe sont filmAs en commengant 
 par le premier plat et en termlnant solt par la 
 derniire page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'lilustration, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont film6s en commenpant par la 
 premlAre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'lilustration et en terminant par 
 la derniire page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un des symboies sulvants apparaftra sur ia 
 derniAre image de cheque microfiche, selon ie 
 cas: le symbols — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely Included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many fremes as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 fiimte A des taux de reduction diff6rents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul clichA, 11 est film* A partir 
 de I'angle supArleur geuche, de gauche A droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 lllustrent la mithode. 
 
 errata 
 to 
 
 I pelure, 
 sn A 
 
 n 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 

 / 
 
 f 
 
 ti 
 
 ■(■^ ■. !r ■ rn-fr' ••'r;r;'«f 
 
 ■;-;t.- .-^•/*^..■^■ 
 
 a . .►. , .1 
 
 i-:r 
 
 r?f 
 
 UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION. 
 
 ■■*,>> 
 
 See Montreal Herald, 20th March, 1868, 
 
 IN BE. 
 
 "ST. LOUIS HYDRAtUC BILL." 
 
 N\>> 
 
 i* » — 
 
 •n 
 
 
 The St. Louis Hydraulic CoMpANf».i'^f 'his as^ciation, or its promoters, ' J 
 are, we learn, taking a step to secure thfer*^bT^S6t^"which cannot but appear ''j 
 very remarkable, and, as we suppose, is wholly unprecedented. They are cir- 
 culatiog for signature a petition praying for the passing of the bill, which is to^^ 
 give them possession of the property of a nunjber of gentlemen, who do not ^ 
 desire to sell, except on the usual terms upon which people dispose of what 
 belongs to them : viz, at the price which they fix themselves. This step to 
 
 say the least of it, is one which shows very little delicacy, when we consider 
 that the point on which the aid and stress of public opinibn is thus invoked, is'' 
 as to whether the parties to the act of incorporation shall obtain, at their own 
 desire, something to which at present they" have no right, and can hereafter 
 have no moral right whatever. If the proprietors who are to be ousted, were .j, 
 to obtain signatures to petitions intended t<x defend their just claims to pro- 
 perty now undoubtedly theirs, one could understand it. They have a plain, 
 equitable, and legal connection with the matter in dispute, such as civilized f^ 
 men everywhere recognize ; but those who sfeek to become its possessors have'* 
 at present no other connection or interest iff it, than the affection which they 
 have conceived for it — we say affection in preference to the word mentioned in 
 the tenth commandment in order to keep the discussion within the bound of 
 reason, without calling for the intervention of conscience. One would think 
 that when these gentlemen found that they could not agree with the proprietors 
 of the land they wanted, they would have abandoned their project, or would 
 have sought to obtain an accommodation by the offer of better terms ; — or 
 again, that if they were absolutely bent on manufacturing, they would have 
 found some other site for their industry, where they would be welcomed. In 
 fact, however, they do not intend manufacturing, but speculating, and the 
 speculation is on the spoliation of other people. For if there is a profit to be 
 expected from the possession of this property at its present value, who ought to 
 have that profit? Is it they to whom the land belongs, or some gentlemen 
 who riding by have been taken by the capabilities of the site ? If the place 
 selected become a great scat of industry, why is it to go out of the hands of its 
 
present owners, and into the hands of persons, who only purpose as a condition 
 of the acquisition to subscribe a sum of money quite within the power of any 
 one of the present owners ? The proposition is this — We, mere strangers to 
 this property, except in so far as the attraction it has exercised over our ac- 
 quisitive organs establishes a sympathetic link between the dirty acres and our 
 hearts and pockets, can by investing a small sum of !noney, obtain further as- 
 sistance from capitalists, uud with this can convert your homesteads into some 
 thin^ of indefinitive value, for our benefit. We therefore propose to take these 
 homesteads. But, say, the objectors, '' we can do that ourselves ; sime of us 
 " indeed, contemplate doing it ourselves in our own way, and for our own 
 ** profit. We bought the profierty, in fact, just with this design." "No matter," 
 reply the Joint Stock gentlemen, " we will send round and get signatures to a 
 " petition from people who have as little right as ourselves and with that, and 
 " with the interest some of us have in Parliament and in the Government, we 
 " have little need to care for your very weak notions about being master of 
 " what you have paid for." Now, it does seem to us that persons who are 
 urging a measure in which they arc, so far, irere intruders, might be content 
 to leave their side of the case to rest upon what the law officers of the Crown 
 will hold to be the correct principles of eipropriation, without attempting to 
 bring to bear upon the decision influences which cannot be governed by any ap- 
 preciation of right or wrong. We think it proper, therefore, to caution those 
 who may be asked to sign this petition to think a little before they yield, as 
 persons frequently do yield, to such requests. The very same principles may 
 hereafter be applied to themselves, and they may find that when they have 
 asked a price for their property which the would-be purchaser does not choose 
 to give, such would-be purchaser will have only to apply for an Act of in- 
 corporation, associate himself with a few other persons, and get himself put 
 into possession at a valuation. At this moment there are two or three Asso- 
 ciations to whom the adoption of such a principle would be very convenient. 
 The Warehousing Company might like to obtain a number of properties of a 
 prospectively increasing value, at what abritators would conceive to be the fair 
 price of the day ; and the gentlemen who are known to have been in treaty for 
 the property of the Bank du Peuple for an Hotel, without so fur coming to 
 terms with the Bank, would have the whole matter settled by an Act of Par- 
 liament. If there were no other reason for objeoting to such a law as the one 
 now sought for, the manifest hardship and inequality of its operation should be 
 enough to condemn it. There is no man in his senses who can suppose that an 
 Act of Parliament could be put through to take a property for such limited 
 and merely private purpose, as the one in question, from any person of influence 
 in politics — say Mr. Brydges, or Mr. Ferrier, or Mr. Gait. Why then should 
 persons without this influence be made victims ? In the present case it is true 
 that all the proprietors ooncatned are men of good social position and means, 
 and able to make some resisUnoe ; but once introduce this precedent into legis- 
 lation, and what chance would there be for a single individual, perhaps, utterly 
 ignorant of the methods of conducting public business, and with no means ex- 
 cept the property whose very desirability, like the beauty of some women, 
 might constitute the chief danger of its possessor. At this moment we see the 
 question of the abaolute nghta of property discussed elsewhere on the very 
 
largest scale, by the finest iDtelleots, and under circumstances which may well 
 reduoe the value of these rights to the lowest point, or cause men to believe 
 that they must at any cost be made to yield to rights still more sacred and 
 paramount. When millions of human beings are confessedly suffering miseries, 
 unknown elsewhere, and when the whole frame-work of a great empire and 
 ft civilized society has become insecure and dangerous, the most conservative 
 of men may not unreasonably believe that the extreme pretensions of pro- 
 perty must, if necessary, give way. But even men like Mr. Mill and Mr. 
 Bright, who believe that Ireland might be regenerated by commuting the 
 tenure of land, and who, therefore, advocate that measure, do so with a full 
 consciousness of the great hazards and dangers which must attend any inter- 
 ference with the fundamental rule upon which depends the stability of all men's 
 possessions. If even to pacify a nation and to save an empire the boldest 
 shrink from, banding over to the tenant the fee simple of the lands which have 
 been fertilized by his labour at a rent to be fixed by arbitration, what shall be 
 said of an attempt on the part of half a dozen or half a scoi*e of persons who 
 are neither landlord nor tenants and who have no legitimate interest at all, to 
 break through the most ancient rules of property for the sake of creating large 
 fortunes for themselves ? 
 
 Statement of the grounds on which it is (intended that the Bill to incorporate 
 the St. Louis Hydraulic Company ^ passed hy the Parliament of the 
 Province of Quebec hut reserved for the Royal assent should not he 
 passed. 
 
 The first ground upon which it is believed, the Royal assent must be re- 
 faseu to this Bill is its unconstitutionality. One of its most important clauses, 
 gives a right to dam a navigable channel of the St. Lawrence, a river whose 
 property and right of conservancy is in the Government of the Dominion, end 
 not in that of the Province of Quebec. Even if the proposed dam were not 
 intended to obstruct a navigable channel, it would be not the less true, that 
 the water in that part of the stream is not within the domain of the Local 
 Government, because it is impossible to divide a river, and to say that the 
 navigable part belongs to one authority and the non-navigable part to another. 
 However there can be no doubt of the navigability of the channel, which it is 
 now intended to close, since before the construction of the artificial navigation 
 by the Lachine Canal, it was by that course that all the vessels bound upwards 
 used to pass the Lachine Eapids. It is believed| that there can be no doubt 
 therefore of the Bill in question being ultra vires of the Parliament of Quebec. 
 If not, it must be because the stream which is to be dammed, is held to be non- 
 navigable. But if so, the promoters of the Bill have asked, and so far as the 
 action of the Quebec Legislature is concerned, have obtained the gift of a 
 property, supposed, by them, to be of enormous value, which did not belong to 
 the public ; but to the riparian proprietors, and this without any conipensation 
 whatever to these proprietors. Since the passing of the Seigniorial Tenuie 
 Bill, there pan bo no cjuestjoij on %kU subject. The Seigniorial Tenure Couit 
 
♦ > 
 
 declared, evea bebre the passing of that act, that the water of non-Davigable 
 ntrenms, by law, belonged to the riparian nroprietors ; and the act followed that 
 decision und established the rights of such proprietors, by a most comprehen- 
 sive eniictment. Is it to be supposed that, after the country has thus deliber 
 ately determined that the individual ownership of non-navigable waters, shall 
 be in the censitaire to the utter abolition of the pretensions heretofore made by 
 the holder of the dominium directum, a body of mere strangers can, at their 
 own request, be put into possession of this property, without the smallest oo . - 
 pensation to those from whom it is usurped ? If so, one of the leading features 
 in the policy of the legislation on the Seigniorial Tenure will be utterly de- 
 stroyed, and after lirge sums of money have been expended to confirm the title 
 of the censitaire as against another ancient claimant who moreover had written 
 titles, the censitaire will find himself despoiled by persons absolutely without 
 title, except the vulgar desire of owning that which belongs to others. 
 
 The Bill is farther opposed on the ground that it will if passed, consecrate 
 the worst kind of spoliation of other private and vested rights. It provides 
 that the persons to be incorporated may go upon the lands which border the 
 ohaniiol, which it is proposed to dam. and tuke all or any part of those lands, 
 at prices to be fixed by arbitrators. The Bill, in short, confers upon this Com- 
 pany all the prerogatives which belong to the State in order that (in case of 
 need), it may exercise its supreme authority by the expropriation pour cause 
 d'utiUfipubUque. It is contended that the circumstances under which this 
 Bill have been applied for, and passed by the two houses at Quebec, are not 
 such us to justify the delegation of this extraordinary prerogative of the 
 Sovereign. The expropriation pour cause d'utilitS publique is essentially op- 
 posed to any idea of private profit, or subsequent private ownership of the land 
 expropriated. In its principle it is the Prince representing the State, who 
 takes, for purposes to which the idea of profit and subsequently private owner- 
 Hliip is utterly foreign — as for the construction of citadelt<, harbours, canals, &o., 
 which have in all ages been regarded bv civilized communities as constructions 
 that should be made by the 6tate, and when made as the property of the 
 Stute. Even for such purposes the expropriation ought only to take place, ac- 
 cording to the best authorities on the subject, when the land to be taken is the 
 particular property required for the purpose, and when none other will serve, 
 or at all events none other will serve except at a very considerable diminution 
 of efficiency in the work to be constructed. Now the purposes for which it is 
 intended to acquire property under this Bill do not conform to any of these 
 conditions. 
 
 1st. The purpose is not m&inly a general one, nor one which can be described 
 as d'vtiliti publique though incidentally like all . idustrial enterprises, it will 
 if prosecuted, add to the prosperity of the country In this respect it only 
 differs in degree from any other industrial enterprise whatever, and if it be a 
 catue d'utiliti publique to construct one dam for obtaining water power it must 
 be equally so to construct any other-^or even to establish a steam engine in- 
 tended to move machinery for industrial purposes. Yet it will surely not be 
 pretended that the hundreds of men who m this Province desire to to be mill 
 owners have *i right to inroke the prerogative of expropriation which belongs 
 
-navigable 
 lowed that 
 3mpreben- 
 iis deiiber 
 ters, shall 
 e made by 
 I, at their 
 allest 00 . - 
 ig features 
 itterly de- 
 va the title 
 ad written 
 ly without 
 
 3. 
 
 consecrate 
 X provides 
 border the 
 tiose lands, 
 this Com- 
 (in case of 
 oour cause 
 which this 
 0, are not 
 ,ve of the 
 Qtially op- 
 3f the land 
 State, who 
 ate owoer- 
 mnals, &o., 
 [istructions 
 rty of the 
 place, ao- 
 iiken is the 
 will serve, 
 liminution 
 which it is 
 of these 
 
 i described 
 ies, it will 
 )ct it only 
 if it be a 
 'er it must 
 engine in- 
 jly not be 
 to be mill 
 ch belongs 
 
 to the State, in order to lave them from what they may coosider a hard 
 bargain. 
 
 2nd. In the present instance it is not in any sense the State by whom the 
 property is to be acquired and owned, and yet this is »n essential condition of 
 the just exercise of the prerogative of esepnwriaiion. It may bo said that in 
 modern times, the condition has been often departed from, and the example of 
 expropriations for railways will no doubt be relied upon as a precedent, and 
 has probably suggested the objectionable clauses in the present Bill. But that 
 supposed analogv, occurring very naturally to the minds of men who have hud 
 to deal frequently with lc<«(islation which confers the power, without having 
 had to consider the basis of it, cannot for a moment stand the test of scientifio 
 investigation. No doubt there may be cases wherp it is difiGcult to draw the 
 precise line between a public work and a private enterprize, and it is possible 
 that legislation may be cited, which, enacted by popular bodies at the request 
 of interested persons, generally ignorant, sometimes unscrupulous, and occa- 
 sionally without opposition from the proprietors who are to bo affected, has 
 overpassed tho just limit. But in general it will be found that the true rules 
 have not been infringed upon. They certainly have not been in the case of 
 railway expropriations ; for no one can doubt that it is one of the first func- 
 tions of all civilised governments to construct roads and other great communi- 
 cations according to the best scientific methods of the day. If this duty has 
 sometimes even in the case of Turnpike roads been committed to trustees, 
 empowered to borrow money, and pay interest from the tolls, or even to Com- 
 panies entitled to levy tolls for the sake of paying interest in the shape of divi- 
 dends on the capital outlay, that has been only the mode adopted of obtaining; 
 the construction and maintenance of the work at a cheaper rate than was 
 suppo&ed possible by day labour under oflBclal supervision. But the roads so 
 made are still the Ciueen's highways — the railways built by companies no le^a 
 than the Turnpikes built by the same agency. The former cannot as Lord 
 Cairns has decided be so mortgaged as to divert them from the public purpose 
 for which they were intended. Their rates of fare are limited ; and m moi<t 
 countries the State either exercises a concurrent control with the Companies, 
 or has granted Charters subject to its own right thereafter to re-acquire the 
 roads. The private property in these roads is therefore a mere incident in a 
 work essentially public, and the reason why the intervention of private propri- 
 etors was admitted is well known to te the practical difficulty or impossibility 
 of allowing the running of carriages upon them under diverse management. 
 Yet even so, many of the ablest thinkers believe that the State ought never to 
 have delegated its power, even partially, into private hands, and ought to 
 resume all such delegations. 
 
 It is submitted that these considerations show the utter impossibility of 
 reasoning from the justice of expropriation for railway purposi^s, to the expro- 
 priation ibr whi'^h authority is now asked. It surely cannot be pretended that 
 it is or over has been considered as a function or duty of the State to construct 
 water powere for manufacturing purposes in competition with other owners of 
 mill sites : nor, that under the present Bill, the State will possess any property 
 in the works to bo constructed ; nor, that a manufacturing business, upon how- 
 ever large a scale, of which thei'e are thousands throughout the country, can 
 
6 
 
 be looked upon as a matter of such geueral and public utility as to justify tho 
 intervention of one of the high prerogatives ot tho State, as against the laws 
 which ordinarily govern society. 
 
 3rd. Other and subsidiary reasons mav be urged in supfvort of the above 
 why the consent of His Ezoellency should be refused to this Bill. Among 
 these, it may be pointed out that usually the land which is required for u 
 public improvement, is of very small value compared to the work to be erected 
 upn it ; out in this case the great value of the property which the Company 
 , will own if its project should be carried out, will not consist in the works 
 which they erect, but in the power of thn water, that they are to make avail- 
 able, at an outlay which, compared to the expected results, is exceedingly 
 small. Thus the persons seeking incorporation do not propose to create the 
 major part of the value which they are to own, but to force the major part of 
 the value, which is already existing, out of the hands of the present propri- 
 etors, and merely render it available by an inconsiderable investment. In this 
 respect the actual demand, is the case of persons who should claim to be put 
 into possession of a gold or other valuable mine, worth thousands of poundhi, 
 upon the consideration that they would aid in the development of the property 
 by the erection of a winch, at the cost of a few sco*"* of dollars. 
 
 Another very important consideration arises from the last fact. Supposing 
 that in opposition to the established principles which have been developed 
 above, it should be held that the possessors of a valuable piece of natural 
 wealth ought not to be allowed to lock it up from the use of mankind, and thus 
 play the part of the " dog in the manger. It cannot be pretended that the 
 first comers who ask for it, are to have it conferred upon them, though they may 
 be wilhng to do nothing for its development, and merely mean to put it on the 
 market for other purchasers, in the shape of subscribers to a joint stock com- 
 pany. In that case the right causes of expropriation would cease to be those 
 which have been described by authors, and would hereafter consist of a penalty 
 to be exacted for the benefit of the prosecutor from owners who do not make 
 the best use of their land. But even if that is to be imported as a principle 
 into the equitable laws, of which all municipal laws should be the application 
 and interpretation, surely the actual proprietors have the first right, after due 
 warning, to be allowed to make the required amelioration, and to secure the 
 profit, in preference tc mere intruders. 
 
 The promoters of this Bill set up that they intend to construct a very im- 
 portant water power. How do they know that the proprietors whom they are 
 to eject, do not intend to do the same thing ? Yet these new claimants do not 
 pledge themselves absolutely to eflfect this work, but they demand three— or 
 practically ten — ^years, during which they shall retaiL the privilege, without 
 committing themselves to any responsibility whatever. Surely the present 
 proprietors have not by their delay to make this improvement committed so 
 grave an offence as to shut themselves out of the days of grace which are asked 
 by mere strangers, whose sok claim consists in their pretended intention to do 
 the projected work. In point of fact, some of the proprietors have just as 
 keen an appreciation of the capabilities of this site as the gentlemen who, in 
 virtue of their appreciation of them, seek to appropriate it. They desire to 
 render these capabilities available in their own time and their own way, of 
 
justify tho 
 iDSt the laws 
 
 )f the above 
 
 ill. AlUQDg 
 
 quired for a 
 :o be erected 
 he Company 
 Q the works 
 make avail- 
 exceedingly 
 o create the 
 lajor part of 
 jsent propri- 
 int. In this 
 im to be put 
 8 of poundfci, 
 the property 
 
 Supposing 
 in developed 
 i of natural 
 nd, and thus 
 led that the 
 gh they may 
 mt it on the 
 ; stock corn- 
 to be those 
 of a penalty 
 
 not make 
 a principle 
 application 
 
 t, after due 
 ) secure the 
 
 b a very im- 
 }m they are 
 kants do not 
 
 1 three — or 
 ge, without 
 the present 
 mmitted so 
 h are asked 
 ntion to do 
 ave just as 
 oen who, in 
 )y desire to 
 wn way, of 
 
 course fur their owt. benefit, but also, with as great a benefit to the public as 
 can be conferred by ani^ other plon. Why are they and their plans to be 
 superseded ? The question may be tested by another question. If the pro- 
 moters of this Bill, in virtue of a pretension — moreover an unproved preten- 
 sion — that they will make of this property better use than the present owners, 
 can usurp possensian, what will be the future value to the intrusive owners of 
 their new-fangled Parliamentary title ? Why should not some still abler or 
 more enterprising or more boastful speculators obtain the right to dispossess 
 them, in order still further to improve their improvements ? Onoe admit the 
 idea we are now discussing, and property will no longer be held by the ordi- 
 nary stable and l"gul title ; but only by the iact that the owner docs not 
 promise — truly or falsely — to do as magnificent things us some landless person, 
 possibly a mere quack, may undertake. The penalty for not conceiving and 
 working out the very highest capability of a property, will be to lose it ; but 
 afterwards the holder of the championship must, in his turn, answer all chal- 
 lengers. 
 
 In close connection with this part of the subject, is the very Small sum of 
 money, the investment of which is to authorize the persons seeking incorpora- 
 tion, to poscess themselves of the property. So soon as they have got together 
 the paltry sum of $10,000, they Hre to be able to dispossess against their will 
 the owners of land worth some hundreds of thousands of pounds in the 
 aggregate. Can any proposition be more reasonable ? — especially when there 
 is not one of the proprietors thus to be unceremoniously turned out, who could 
 not easily raise the whole of this small capital himself! The mode-it persons 
 who ask thus to be put in possession of the estates of others, on account of the 
 service they are abuut to confer upon the public, measure this service by the 
 standard of $10,000, that is to say, of £250 for each of the ten gentlemen 
 named in the bill. All the rest of the money required they are to borrow on 
 mortgage, or to raise by shares issued on the basis of land, of which to-duy 
 they do not own an inch. Why again is it asked, are the present proprietors 
 not to be allowed one hour to see whether they cannot obtain the funds 
 required to give them the control, and profit of improvements on what belongs 
 to them, while mere strangers ask for the tee simple of the land, without tliu 
 risk of forfeiture for neglect of use during a period of ten years. 
 
 In conclusion it is respectfully submitted, that if the principle of this bill 
 be adopted in our legislation, the fee simple of land will not consist of the right 
 to hold it ; but only of the right to appoint one of three valuators to fix the 
 price to be paid by the first company who wants to buy it. But as the new 
 purchaser must be subjected to the consequences of the same philosophical 
 conception of the nature of property, his holding will be as precarious as tnut 
 of his predecessor — a tenor which will introduce some novel and very startling 
 changes into the law of real estate 
 
 Copy of a Report of a Committee of the Honourable the Privy Council ^ 
 approved by Ilia Excellency the Administrator in Council, on the ISth 
 January, 1869. 
 
 On a Keport dated 11th January, 1869, from the Honourable the Minister 
 
i! 
 
 8 
 
 of Justice on a despatch of the Licuionaot-Govornor of the ProviDco of 
 Quebec, of the 28th February last, enclosing a Bill which he had reserved for 
 the assent of the Governor-Oeueral intituled : '' An Act to Incorporate the St. 
 Louis Hydraulic Company." 
 
 The Minister of Justice reports that this Cuiiipuny in proposed to be incor- 
 porated, for the purpose of creating a water-power by the erection of a daiu 
 across the river St. Lawrence, running between Isle-nu Heron and the northern 
 bank of the river. 
 
 That the Bill was reserved for the Governor-Geucrarrt assent, on the report 
 of the Attorney-General for Quebec. 
 
 That in his opinion, the second clause of the act, which authorises the 
 construction of this dam, appeared to fall within the powers of the Parliament 
 of Canada, under the 10th paragraph of the Olst section of the Union Act. 
 
 That as it is a matter of national importance to preserve the navigation of 
 the greatest river in the Dominion from being obstructed, and as it was the 
 opinion of some professional men, that the erection of the proposed dam would 
 not only injuriously affect the navigation of the river, but cause great injury 
 to property on or near its banks, he, the Minister of justice, thought it 
 expedient that a report should be obtained from the Chief Engineer of the 
 Department of Pubfio Works on the subject. That report, a copy of which 
 he submits, was, he states, received by him on the 24th ultimo. 
 
 That the whole tenor of this report shows, that Mr. Page apprehends that 
 the projoctod work would cause serious changes of a prejudicial character in 
 the navigation of the river and might be the means of injuring private property 
 to an extent which cannot now be calculated. 
 
 That after such a report, and without reference to the constitutionality of 
 the act, he is of opinion that it would not be safe, in the public interests, to 
 allow this bill to become law. 
 
 He therefore rccommenda that your Excellency's sanction be not given to it, 
 and that such decision, together with a copy of Mr. Page's report, be 
 transmitted to the Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec, for his information. 
 
 The Committee concurs in the abovt; recommendation and submits the same 
 for your Excellency's approval. 
 
 Certified, 
 
 (Signed) W. H. LEE, 
 
 C.P.C. 
 
 To the Honourable 
 
 The Secretary of State for the Provinces, Slq. 
 
 Ottawa, 7th December, 1868. 
 The Secretary of Public Works. 
 Sir, 
 
 I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter (No. 
 2864), drawing attention to certain enauiries, made by the Honourable the 
 Minister of Justice, relative to tb? probable effects of t^e works purpoied to be 
 
9 
 
 oouitruotflU by a Compaoy, at or oear the LaohiDO llapida in tbo ilivor St. 
 Lawrer- 
 
 With ^ . .c4v of placinz tho matter fully before the Departiuunt, it is deemed 
 proper first, to give a buef statement of the leading points contained in the 
 documents, which hove been submitted both for and against the scheme, 
 together with reference to other papers bearing on the subject. 
 
 It appears that a number of gentlemen, residenti of Montreal and othor parts 
 of the Province of Quebec, are desirous of being incorporated under the name 
 of the '' 8t. Louis Hydraulic Company," for the purpose of carrying on tbe 
 business of creating water power for driving of Mills and Machinery by tbe 
 v3onstruotion of dams, sluices and other mechanical appliances, and of leasing or 
 selling the same." 
 
 The place where they purpose engaging in this bubiness is at, or near, that 
 part of the River i^t. Jiuwrence known ad the Lachine Rapids and in the vicinity 
 of Montreal. 
 
 They represent Iwivin^ made an arrangement for the undivided half or 
 moiety of that certain fief, in the district of Montreal, known as Tlsle au-Ueron, 
 in the river St. Lawrence, near the St. Louis or Lachine rapids, etc. 
 
 In confirmation of this, a copy of a notarial document dated 4th December, 
 1866, is submitted from which it appears that the transfer of the undivided 
 half of risle-au-H^ron has been made conditionally, that is to say, in case the 
 company be not incorporated and ohartered» or of its failing to carry out the 
 terms of the arrangement, then re-assignment of the property is to be made to 
 the original owner or person who made the transfer. 
 
 On a memorial setting forth the objects proposed to be effected by the com- 
 pany, an act of incorporation was passed at the last session of the Legislature 
 of Quebec, authorizing a Joint-Stock Company to be formed, with power to 
 take possession of part of the bed and boaoh of the St. Lawrence, to purchase, 
 acquire and hold lands for canals, roads, ditches, &c., and construct a dam 
 between Isle-au-Hdron and the North Shore of tbe River. 
 
 The several clauses of chapter 66 of the Consolidated Statutes of Canada, 
 under the several heads of Powers, Plans and Survey Lands, and their valua- 
 tion and fences shall be incorporated with this Act, 8u!., 5bc. 
 
 The company to have a capital stock of two millions of dollars with power 
 to increase that amount, if deemed proper. The charter to be forfeited if the 
 (sompany do not go into actual operation within three years. The construction 
 of the works not to be commenced until one million of dollars of the capital 
 stock is subscribed, nor until one hundred thousand dollars shall have been 
 paid up. 
 
 This Act or Bill was however reserved for the Royal assent. 
 
 Sinoe the Bill was passed by the Lsgislature of Quebec, several memorials 
 have been presented to His Ezcellenoy the Governor-General praying for 
 various reasons therein stated, that it be disallowed, viz : — 
 
 1st. From W. J. Knox and Robert Knox (18th March, 1868), owners of 
 Mills at the Lachine Rapids, representing that, by the Bill, the St. Louis 
 Hydraulic Company would have the power of constructing works which would 
 destroy the water-power owned by them, tho memorialists. 
 
 That the Company would have the right of acquiring a large amount of 
 
] * 
 
 j 
 
 10 
 
 property that would prevent the carrying out of a scheme, which had been in 
 contemplation for the last thirty years, for the further developement of tha 
 water-powers, &c. 
 
 2nd. From F. B. Mathews (2l8t March, 1S68), owner of the undivided 
 half of Jsle-au-Heron, praying that his property may not bo taken possession 
 of, against his will, for the benefit of a private Company, &c. 
 
 3rd. From Hugh Fraser, and eighteen other proprietors of land lying on 
 the north-shore of the River St. Lawrence, between Montreal and Lachine 
 (23rd iVlarch, 1868), praying that assent to the Bill be withheld, inasmuch as 
 the passage of a law giving private individuals and speculators the right to take 
 the property of their neighbours, at their own valuation, would tend to destroy 
 the security hitherto enjoyed by the inhabitants of the country^ in their titles 
 to lands, &c. 
 
 The petitioners also state that they believe the Bill in its present shape to 
 be unconstitutional for various reasons and amongst others, those recapitulated 
 in the expose or factum hereunto annexed, and respectfully submitted, &c. 
 
 The document thus referred to is headed "Statement of the grounds on 
 which it is contended that the Bill to incorporate the St. Louis Hydraulic 
 Company, passed by the Parliament of the Province of Quebec, but reserved 
 for the Koyal assent, should not be passed." 
 
 In this paper the principal features of the Bill are discussed and reasons 
 assigned why it should be disallowed. This document seems to have been 
 ably and carefully prepared and as a whole is well worthy of consideration. 
 
 There is also a memorial (dated March, 1868,) signed by i'31 persons 
 chiefly residents of Montreal, to His Excellency the Governor General, praying 
 that the Bill may be assented to, inasmuch as the carrying out of the proposed 
 undertaking would secure to Montreal an unfailing supply of pure water, and 
 create an immense amount of invaluable water-poj?er for general use, &c. 
 
 In this connection it may be stated that an Act was passed in 1861, (24 Vic. 
 cap. 96) intituled : " An Act to incorporate the Montreal Hydraulic and 
 Dock Company." By the third section of this Act the company are em- 
 powered to make a canal and conduct water from some point on the river 8t. 
 Lawrence, within seven miles from the city of M ntreal, for the use and supply 
 of the said Docks or for Hydraulic or manufacturing purposes. 
 
 By the fifth section, the company has the power to lease or sell water-power 
 for milla, manufactories, &c., &c,, " but none of the provisions in this Act 
 " mentioned, as to taking possession of and entering upon lands, shall apply to 
 ** lands to be purchased along the canal, applying the said water-power, which 
 " land shall only be acquired by voluntary contract and agreement." 
 
 By the 45th section, the powers of the company are to cease if their works 
 are not commenced within three years, or are not finished or put in operation 
 within ten years from the passing of this Act. 
 
 Ihe Act shows that the scheme was looked upon as consisting of two distinct 
 parts ; the principal one or that connected with navigation being considered as 
 essentially a public work, whilst that relating to water-power was viewed and 
 treated as a private undertaking. 
 
 It is believed that the proposed canal was to have been supplied with water 
 
11 
 
 ied with water 
 
 from a point above the Lachine Rapids, where the river is naturally of a 
 height suited to the purposes contemplated. 
 
 It appears from the Acts passed previous to 1839 that the Public Works 
 Department had no power to acquire land as a site for water-powers, or other 
 hydraulic purposes, except in the usual manner of voluntary agreement with 
 the owners, although invested with full power to take possession of all such 
 lands as were necessary for works essentially of a public nature. 
 
 But in 1859 an Act was passed (22 Vic. cap. 3.), intituled, " An Act to 
 amend and consolidate tlie several Acts respecting the Public Works." By the 
 31st section the commissioner may at all times acquire and take possession of 
 all lands or real estate, streams, water and water-courses, the appropriation of 
 which for the use, construction and maintenance of hydraulic privileges made 
 or created, by, from or at such public works, is, in his judgment, necessary, &c. 
 
 In ''An Act respecting the Public Works of Canada," passed in 1S67 (31 
 Vic. cap. 12), the powers relating to acquirement of land are similar to those 
 described in the Act of 1859. 
 
 It therefore appears that pretious to 1859, the Department of Public 
 Works was not invested with the power of taking possession of lands for the 
 water-powers which even the construction of the Provincial Canals had created. 
 
 The exception then made in favour of the department was not however, in 
 1861, extended to the " Montreal Hydraulic and Dock Company," in so far 
 as related to that portion of their project which had for its object the forma- 
 tion ot mill privileges. 
 
 Notwithstanding the magnitude of the scheme now in consideration and its 
 great public importance, if it could be successfully carried out, its chief aim is 
 similar to that part of the Montreal Hydraulic and Dock Company's project 
 from which the power of expropriation was withheld. 
 
 It may therefore fairly be questioned whether such powers could judiciously 
 be conceded to the St. Louis Hydraulic Company. 
 
 The (231) memorialists in favour of the projected undertaking give as their 
 principal reason for supporting it, that it would have the eflFect of " perma- 
 nently securing for the City of Montreal an unfailing supply of pure and 
 wholesome water." 
 
 On examining the plan submitted by the company it appears that the water 
 above the proposed dam is intended to be raised 18 feet, and kept at a height 
 of about 30 feet over ordinary low water mark, in the harbour of Montreal, and 
 in this way it is alleged the desired object will be effected. 
 
 A memorandum, explanatory of the design, shews that during a portion of 
 last winter (1867), a natural dam of ice was actually formed across the lower 
 end of thiij channel and raised the water above it to about the level which will 
 be attained when the permanent dam is constructed, &c., &c. 
 
 A record of the water levels kept by the superintendent of the Montreal 
 Water Works shews that during the period alluded to, viz. the 16th and 18th 
 January, 1867, the water at the site of the proposed dam stood at a height of 
 30. 37 feet above datum or fully 4 inches higher than the level to which it is 
 intended to raise the water above the dam. 
 
 During the remaining portion of the month of January, it varied from 29. 
 74 to 27. 97 and averaged 28. 76 feet about datum, giving for this time a 
 
M 
 
 ih I 
 
 12 
 
 mean fall of 1. 24 feet at the site of the dam when the level above is main- 
 tained at 30 feet as proposed. 
 
 In the month of February it ranged from 28. 97, to 24. 63 feet averaging 
 26. 58 feet over datum and giving for this period a mean fall of 3. 42 feet at 
 the dam. 
 
 From the first to the 21st March, the average level was 25. 61 fi^et over 
 datum giving a mean fall at the dam of 4. 39 feet. 
 
 The general average of the daily levels from 16|h January to 21st March, 
 1867, gives a mean fall of 3. 31 feet. Although the water was backed up in 
 1867 to a greater height at this point on the St. Lawrence than is usually the 
 case, the phenomenon is more or less of annual recurrence so that in ordinary 
 seasons, during the greater part of the months of January, February and 
 March, there is not a fall of more than 4 to 6 feet, under the assumed level, 
 at the place where the dam is proposed to be built. 
 
 Any opinion given as to the probable effects which the construction of a per- 
 manent dam would have on the ice jam below, must of necessity be mere con- 
 jecture it being quite as likely that the height of the back water, hitherto 
 experienced might be augmented as that it would be diminished. In fact the 
 result is something which cannot be foreseen or calculated upon with the 
 slightest degree of certainty. 
 
 From the facts above stated it appears that for a considerable portion of 
 every winter (ice jams and back water continuing as heretofore) there would 
 practically be no available pumping power to eflFect the object for which the 
 memorialists mainly recommend the scheme, nor indeed a sufficient head 
 of water to drive ::ii£cl:iiQery suitable for manufacturing or milling purposes. 
 
 In the memoranda submitted by the company it is stated that the erection 
 of this dam will be followed by the packing back of the water to the lake 100 
 feet and the probable rising of the lake level with its tributary streams. 
 
 This view of the matter is doubtless correct, by closing up tbe north branch 
 of the river, all the water would be forced into the south channel where it 
 would have to pass in a space of much less width than at present occupied by 
 the river, which would of course cause an elevation of the surface level above. 
 
 This increased height of the surface would doubtless bear some proportion- 
 ate relation to the section of the river closed and would be such as lo give ihe 
 water a fall sufficient to produce a velocity which would carry oflf the whole 
 natural flow of the river. The height or distance up stream to which this 
 rise would be experienced it would be all but impossible under any circum- 
 stances to determine correctly in advance, but from this class of information 
 submitted on the part of the company no "data" whatever are afforded, on which 
 to base any opinion relnticg to these important points. 
 
 Indeed when the magnitude of the river, the sets of the rapids and the 
 irregularity rf the chanricl at this place is considered, it seems doubtful whether 
 such details and formula as are applicable to ordinary streams would be any 
 thing like a safe guide, in attempting to form an opinion of the results likely to 
 ensue from the construction of the proposed works. 
 
 The banks of the Birer below Laehineonthe north-side and below Caughna- 
 
13 
 
 waga on the south-siie are understood to be so high that they are unlikely to 
 be flooded to any great extent. 
 
 There is reason to apprehend that a permanent rise in the L ce St. Louis, 
 would, duriug periods of high water, result in considerable damage to several 
 low Islands on the Lake and to tracts of low lands along its shores. 
 
 The streams which now drain the surrounding country might also form 
 channels for conveying water into the interior. Thus the property of a large 
 number of persons, in no way connected with the enterprise, would in all 
 probability be injuriously affected and possibly to an extent which, when fully 
 ascertained, might prove t hi) a serious if not unexpected drain on the means 
 of the Company. 
 
 There is no doubt that if they could cause the proposed undertaking to be 
 successfully accomplished it would greatly advance the manufacturing interests 
 of Vlontreal and be a source of immense benefit to the whole community. 
 
 Nevertheless a project where so many individual interests are at stake and 
 which is open to such serious objections should not be entertained unless it can 
 be clearly shown that it is the best, if not the only way of effecting the object. 
 
 An enterprise of this kind to be really successful should be so situated that 
 the power is as little as possible liable to variation or interruption. This it 
 has been shown is unlikely to be the case with water powers found in the 
 viciuity of Isle-au-H6roo. 
 
 It is however evident that the river St. Lawrence between Montreal and 
 I^achine can supply a very large amount of " unfailing " water-power, but in 
 order to secure this, the water must be drawn from the river at a point oon- 
 sidarably higher than the place selected by the St. Louis Hydraulic Company. 
 That is to say, if from some point within a few miles of Lachine, a canal of 
 large dimensions was CDnstructcd at such a distance from the margin of the 
 river as circumstance required, an almost unlimited number of unfailing 
 water-powers might be formed. 
 
 In this way the probable extent of damages could be foreseen and provided 
 for, the risk of flooding of lands avoided and the hazardous experiment of 
 blocking up a large section of a river of such magnitude as the St. Lawrence 
 rendered unnecessary. 
 
 I have the honour to bo, 
 
 Sir, 
 
 Your cbedient servant, 
 
 (Signed,) 
 
 JOHN PAGE, 
 
 Chf. Engr. P. Works. 
 
 P. S. A copy of my letters on this subject, dated 21st September 1867, is 
 herewith appended. 
 
 All papers bearing on this matter which have been sent or obtained f:om 
 the Office of the Honourable the Minister of Justice are herewith returned. 
 
 (Signed,) 
 
 J. PAGE. 
 
14 
 
 .t 
 
 l! 
 
 
 
 Ottawa, 21st November, 1867. 
 The Secretary of Public Works* 
 Sir, 
 
 I have carefully read over the accompanying report of Mr. Sippell, and the 
 explanatory statements of Mr. Legge, but have failed to obtain from them any 
 other information bearing on the main question, than that the River-banks between 
 Lachine and the proposed dam (on the north-side) and belov? Caughnawaga on 
 the south side, are so high that thC; raising of the water would be unlikely to 
 cause much damage between these points. 
 
 The water levels are not given, except for a short distance above the site of 
 the proposed dam ; so that the effect at Lacbine cannot even be approximtaely 
 ascertained, but both Mr. Sippell and 3Ir. Legge agree that the water in Lake 
 St. Louis will be raised. Mr. Sippell states that the extent of this cannot be 
 determined until after the dam is built, and Mr. Legge remarks that the 
 precise amount of the ** pack " cannot be definitely ascertained at present 
 except at great labour and expense. We therefore propose to establish beach- 
 marks along the margin of the rivei lod lake for the purpose of ascertaining 
 the amount of damage that may be caused at a future period. Mr. Sippell 
 further remarks that although there will not be so much drowned land below 
 the villages of Lachine and Caughuawaga, there are however large tracts of 
 lowland on the shores of the lake and several large islands which would 
 probably be rendered worthless." 
 
 The works and improvements proposed are doubtless of great importance 
 and if executed would create very extensive water powers, irrespective of other 
 advantages claimed for them by the applicants. 
 
 The scheme, however, is of such a nature that a large number of land owners 
 in no way coanected with it, would in all probability be injuriously aflFected, 
 and no attempt seems to have been made to arrive even at an approximate 
 estimate of what these damages would amount to. 
 
 In this view of the matter it appears to me that the interest of the Company 
 would not be consulted, should they embark in an undertaking of such magni- 
 tude without some knowledge of the liabilities which they would be inevitably 
 called on to meet, while at the same time, it is open to question whether it 
 would be fair to place the land-owners in a position where the only compensa- 
 tion they could obtain would be from the funds of a limited liability company. 
 
 It is presumed that the general government has the control of all main 
 navigable rivers and can proceed with such undertakings as may be fairly con- 
 sidered of national importance, by allowing reasonable compensation to all 
 parties suffering damage by the construction of the works. 
 
 Semewhat analogors powers are given to Railway Companies, but the amount 
 of land required for their purposes is usually determined beforehand with 
 suflBcient accuracy, and the extent to which they will interfere with the rights 
 of private parties is generally foreseen and provided for. It does not however 
 follow that powers of a similar nature could with equal propriety be granted to 
 the St. Louis Hydraulic Company, inasmuch as the extent of the damage for 
 which they may be liable is not stated and when asoortaiued might prove to 
 be of such magnitude as to be wholly beyond their means. Besides in the ab- 
 
67. 
 
 16 
 
 sence of the necessary information, oonfidence in the scheme would doubtle3S 
 be lessened by those likely to sustain damage from it. 
 
 It must aho be borne in mind, that the effect of shutting off so large a sectional 
 area of the river would not be confined merely to throwing into the south-chan- 
 nel, the volume of water, which has hitherto flowed through the north-channel ; 
 but will establish a permanent rise at all stages on the normal levels of the 
 river above the dam, and this rise will be proportionally greater during periods 
 Of high water. 
 
 In the absence of proper data, it is impossible to even approximately esti- 
 mate what the rise of the water would bo ; but it is probable that it would not 
 be only the low-lands on the margin of the lake Sc. Louis or its Islands that 
 would be affected, but it will also back up into the rivulets and streams which 
 drain the surrounding country. It therefore appears to me that, although this 
 undertaking would doubtless be greatly beneficial to the manufacturing interests 
 of the community, it would at the same time, be likely to affect injuriously 
 those of a large number of individual land-owners in the Province of Qaebec, 
 which might eventually lead to serious complications. If this view of the case 
 be correct, it would be scarcely judicious for the Department to treat the ap- 
 plication of St. Louis Hydraulic Company as cjming within the scope of the 
 general Act respecting Joint-Stock Companies. 
 
 I have, etc., 
 
 (Signed,) J. PAGE, 
 
 Chief Eng. Pub. Works. 
 
 The powers thus sought by the projectors of this Bill, under the several 
 clauses of Chapter 66 of the Consolidated Statutes of Canada, under the 
 several heads of powers, &c., &c., which should be applicable only to Public 
 Companies in case of disagreement between proprietors aud petitioners, is to be 
 settled as stated in the Act by the Arbitrator, of course to be named by the 
 petitioners, who is empowered to name what he considers a fair compensation 
 for the land, damages, &c., &c., It is then provided by the ninth clause of 
 the Act, That, 
 
 " If within ten days after the service of such notice, or within one month after 
 the first publication thereof as aforesaid, tlie opposite party does not notify to 
 the Company his acceptance of the sum offered by them, or notify to them the 
 name of a person whom he appoints as Arbitrator, then the Judge shall, on the 
 application of the Company, appoint a Sworn Suveyor for Upper or Lower 
 Canada, as the case may be, to be sole Arbitrator for determining the compensa- 
 tion to be paid as aforesaid." 
 
 And although provision is made for the appointment of an arbitrator by the 
 oppoiing party, and the appointment of a tni'.d by the arbitrators, or a judge 
 on the application of the Company, no provision is made for the water privil- 
 eges connected with the several properties, the Company would be empowered 
 to wrench from the proprietors or the "prix d'affection" their undoubted right. 
 There is not a farm at any point along the entire line this Company would in- 
 clude in their Charter, upon which a " Mill privilege" does not exist, and that 
 
16 
 
 I I 
 
 l^ 
 
 
 might not be utilized at comparatively small outlay. The grant of such a 
 Charter, therefore, would no doubt enrich a few '' PRIVATE " speculators at the 
 expense of the proprietary— the extent of land, too, the Company seek thn 
 right to take on the banks' of the proposed ''Hydraulic ^Yorks," would render 
 the remainder of the farms useless for agricultural purposes, if not totally de- 
 stroyed by inundations, as in all probability they would be. The idea of the 
 Company paying indemnity in such cases would be preposterous. The Govern- 
 ment and the people of Canada have already experienced, but triflingly, the 
 damages arising from the ''Beauharnois Canal." The damming of the "Great 
 ^t. Lawrence" at the point indicated, would sooner or later destroy millions 
 worth of valuable property. The natural obstruction of the waters at this 
 particular point — " isle-au Heron" — but three years ago, caused the river to 
 rise higher than ever known in that locality, in so much that the ire shoved 
 over the north bank of the river on the high road. 
 
 Apart from various reasons above set forth, there can be no doubt the bed ot 
 the River St. Lawrence is a part of the Public Domain, and out of the juris- 
 diction of the Legislature of the Province of Quebec, as conclusively shewn by 
 the "Factum " above, and as coincided in by the following editorial which ap- 
 peared in the '• Montreal Telegraph " of the 27th February, LS69. 
 
 '•The Minister of Justice probably thought that he had adopted a conciliatory 
 course towards tho Quebec Legislature in disallowing the bill to incorporate 
 the 6t. Louis Hydraulic Company on the ground of the '• public interests," 
 and '' without reference to the constitutionality of the act." The Quebec 
 Legislature is determined to be guided by no such ideas of moderation. It will 
 have all or nothing, and the Minister of Justice will find out before he has 
 done with the question that our note of warning, that the constitution whs in 
 danger, merited a little more serious consideration than it received. On the 
 23th, Mr. JJeaubien, sccouded by Mr. He.mming, moved the suspension of 
 the 51st Rule of the House — that is the rule requiring regular notice for tho 
 introduction of every private bill, m order to introduce the selfsame law the 
 Governor General has disallowed. This motion was carried without a dissent- 
 ing word. VVliat. then, is intended ? Does the Local Legislature mean to 
 try and force the Governor General to declare that the act cannot bo sanctioned 
 because it is unconstitutional, or does it hope to compel the Federal Ministry 
 to neglect "the public interests" in obedience to the vote of a majority of a local 
 legislature ? Sir J-^hn Macdonald may try to avoid bringing these ques- 
 tions to an issue ; bu. they have to be decided, and until a federal court is 
 established, the Federal Ministry will have to decide the constitutionality as 
 well as the adv'sability of every local measure." 
 
 ^^■^i ^: ■!). 
 
 
 -jA..' .:-a:^