IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) /. fc ^ 1.0 I.I HI 2.8 .. .,. Ill 2.5 12 1.8 1^ 1^ Ml 1^ 1.25 = 1.4 III ''^ ■^ 6" - ^ V] jV ^ &.. o / Hiotographic Sciences Corporation °^^^" ^^^ 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEbSTER.N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 ^ «,*^* ^.v^^ L^ CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut canadien de microreproductions historiq ues ■^ Technical and Bibliographic Notat/Notat tachniquaa at bibllographiquaa Tha Inatltuta haa attamptad to obtain tha baat original copy availabia for filming. Faaturat of thia copy which may ba bibliographlcally unlqua, which may altar any of the imagaa In tha raproduction. or which may algnificantly changa tha usual mathod of filming, ara chackad balow. D D D D D n D Colourad covars/ Couvartura da couiaur n Covars damagad/ C( Couvartura andommagAa Covars rastorad and/or laminatad/ Couvartura rastaurAa at/ou palticulAa I I Covar titia missing/ La titra da couvartura manqua I I Colourad maps/ Cartas g4ographiquas an couiaur Colourad ink (i.a. othar than blue or black)/ Encra da couhur (i.a. autra qua blaua ou noira) I I Coloured plates and/or Illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ RailA avec d'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La rsliure serr^a peu2 causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion la Song de la marge IntArieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties lors d'line restauration apparaissant dans le texte, mais, lorsque caia Atait possible, ces pages n'ont pas 6tA fiimies. Additional comments:/ Commentairas supplAmentaires: L'Institut a microfilm^ la malllaur examplaire qu'll iui a AtA poasibia d9 se procurer. Las details da cat exempiaira qri aont paut-itra uniques du point de vua bibllographiqua, qui peuvent modifier una image raproduita, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la mithoda normala da filmage aont indiquAs cl-de«j>ous. r~n Coloured pages/ D This Item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est f'lmA au taux de reduction indlqt:A ci-dessous. Pagea de couleur Pages damaged/ Pagea endommagAas □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurAes at/ou pelliculAes Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages dAcolorAes, tachetAas ou piquAas I I Pages detached/ Pages dAtachees Showthroughy Transparence Quality of prir Quality inigaia da I'lmprassion Includes supplementary matarli Comprend du materiel supplAmentaire r^ Showthrough/ [~n Quality of print varies/ r~~| Includes supplementary material/ I — I Only edition availabia/ Seule Edition diaponibia Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc.. have been ref limed to ensure the best possible Image/ Les pages totalemont ou part!ellement obscurcies par un fa^jiiiet d'errata, une pelure, etc., ont M filmAes A nouveau de fa9on A obtenir la meilleure image possible. 10X 14X 18X 22X 26X 30X 1 1 y 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X The copy filmed here he* been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: Library of the Public Archives of Canada L'exemplaire filmt fut reproduit grAce A la ginArositA de: La biblio'hdquA des Archives pubiiques du Canada The images appearing here are the best quality possible considerinc the condition and legibility of the original copy and in keeping with the filming contract specifications. Les images suivantes ont At6 reproduites avec le plus grand soin, compte tenu de ia condition et de la nettet6 de rexemplaire film6. et en conformity avec les conditions du contrat de filmage. Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed beginnlrg with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated Impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, and onding on the last page with a printed or illustrated impression. Lee axemplairos originaux dont la couverture en papier est imprim6e sont filmis en commengant par le premier pljt et en terminant scit par la dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires originaux sont fiimds en commenpant par la premlAre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par la derni'^re page qui comporte une telle empreinte. The last recorded frame on each micrufiche shall contain the symbol — ^ (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Un des symboles suivants apparaTtra sue la dernlAre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbols -^ signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbule V signifie "FIN". Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The roliowing diagrams illustrate the method: Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre film6s A des taux de reduction diffArents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre reproduit en un seul clich6, ii est film6 A partir de I'angle sup6rieur geuche, de gauche A droite, et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images nicesaaire. Les diagrammes suivants illustrent la m6thode. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 I THE POLITICAL STANDLNG OF IRISH CATHOLICS IN CANADA ; A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ITS CAUSES, WITH SUGGESTIONS FOR ITS AMELIORATION. BY J. L. P. O'HANLY, Civil Engineer. O T T .A. "W" A.. 1872. DEDICATION To John O'Donohoe Esq., Barrister, &c., &c. President of Catholic League, Toronto. My Dear Sir : — Permit me to usher this little stranger into life under the sanction of your name ; stand sponsor for its veracity that it may gain admission to Irish hearths and access to Irish hearts. Let the lowly wayfarer be stamped with your approba- tion, and in its wanderings it cannot fail to be greeted with many a " jead rnille fallthe ; " adopt the tender nursling that the defects of the pvoteyS may be overlooked in the magnanimity of the pat- ron. Though not an offspring of, it can claim near kindred to, the " Catholic League." For it has been stimulated into being by the warmth and fervour of that thrice-blessed organization, whose wise teachings and patriotic efforts have vivified with new life and re- newed hope many a drooping spirit. The league, as sought to be represented by the enemies of Irish Catholics, is not a political organization. Its aim, as I interpret it from its constitution, is to solidify, to consolidate and concentiate into a combined whole, the great body of our people now scattered and divided, floating on an ocean of doubt and uncertainty, tossed about without guide or rudder by every wind of political doctrine. Its mission is to bring order out of chaos, to teach, to train, to in- struct, to educate its members in the fundamental principles of self-government. When that noble and philanthropic object is accomplished, its task will be fulfilled, and it will, like its Irish congener, pass fvoixi life to immortality. Then, individuals, under the influence of natura' laws, directed by reason, will gravitate to congenial parties. Then shall no longer be witnessed the de- moralizing spectacle of the union of likes and dislikes, the unholy alliance of antagonistic elements I This is as it should be, for no friend of his country can desire the perpetuation of politico^ religions societies. Nothing can palliate, much less justify, such iX IV organization?! by a majority ; and it is only in extreme cases, and for special and temj)orar3'^ purposes that a minority should resort to it. Is it surprising that the Conservatives with one accord endeav- our to disparage the league, asperse its founders and traduce its promoters ? They are wise in their generation, they comprehend the situation. They realize the fact that no change can improve their present position. They know that exchange of thought and intelligent discussion would expose their hollo wness and lay bare their subterfuges. They know that Irish Catholics are intuitively 'liberal, and have nothing in common with Toryism. They know the ties which have bound us to t^ie conservatives are weak, flim- sy, decayed, unfit to resist the least strain, and would snap asun- der at the first tug of enlightCiied and united action. Hence, and very naturally, they are putting forth every effort, straining every nerve, to discomfit the league and cru.sh its supporters. The dis- guise is too transparent to deceive any one. Have we not suffi- cient intelligence to thwart their vile machinations ? As the architect of this good edifice, as the artificer of this no- ble structure, accept this slight tribute of esteem from one who has watched your zeal, devotion and patriotism, from one who is glad to be able to bear testimony to your worth, to your abnega- tion of self, and your numerous sacrifices for the good object of promoting the amelioration of your race in this colony, and eleva- ting them to that position to which their numbers and intelligence so justly entitle them. Accept this trifling mark of regard from one whose noblest aim would be to follow in your footsteps, whose highest ambition would be to imitate your fidelity and em- ulate your virtues, whose greatest glory would be to be a disciple and participator in the good works you have initiated, and whose highest honour would be to be deemed worthy of a niche in your memory. Permit me then to offer this dedication as a token, however unworthy, of the respect and esteem in which you are held by An humble Irishman, The Writer. Ottawa, 15th June. 1872. V i m 1 "SI I ,!■'< TO THE IRISH CATHOLICS OF CANADA, PRELIMINARY REMARKS. I f[A *. Fellow-countrymen, 111 venturing to uddiess you, I am not insensible of my in-* abiHty to do ju.stice to a subject which so materiaHy affects your social 8t((tnf< and worldly prosperity ; neither am I ambitious of the notoriety which necessarily a])pertains to so grave and novel a position. I already feel tottering under the burden of my self-im- posed task. Before I have yet donned the armour, I would fain withdraw from a responsibility to which I am une(iual. Did I but consult my own feelings I would gladly shrink fiom an ordeal that can Ijiing me nauglit but visions of glory, naught but the shadows of fame. Cheerfully would I resign my pen into hands more capable of vindicating your cause : gladly would I abdicate in favour of one more com[)etent to shape, control and influence your destiny. I have waited long and patiently in the fond hope that some one, more worthy of your confidence, would step into the breach to demolish the idol at whose shrine we have been fatally worshipping, to slay the hydra that has led us captive, to break the siren spell that we have been following to our own destruc- tion ; and if, at last, I have yielded to the emergency, have plucked up courage sufficient tc approach this momentous (piestion ; if I have dared to file an appearance and grapple with the e\ il ; if I have ventured to remonstrate, to raise a warning voice, 1 do so with a consciousness that my motives will be impugned, my words misconstrued, my as])irations misrepresented — a reward by no means tempting to ambition or luring to cupidity. Being entirely unknown to fame, to many, probably, to • ost of you, I am an utter stranger, even in name, to those who k.: w me only by report, there is little that is inviting to a prolon-v^d ac- quaintance. There are, however, a few who know me intimately, and whose good opinion I value more than any earthly heritage, who will give me credit, at least, for sincerity and disinterested- ness. He who aspires to address, to admonish, to counsel half a million of his brethren, he who even in appearance assumes the ^! 6 4 mle of dictator to so large, and, wliat Hhoiild ordinarily ho, ho povror- ful a c'lasH, j)rt'sunies very far on tlujir forlioaranco, unlos.s liiHclainiH t(» a hearing ate well founded — not mere pretensionH. Thi;s consider- ation 8ugg«!.sts a hrief autohiography. Were 1 egotistical I might as- sure you that, as a civil engineer, and surveyor, 1 am sectmd to none in this Dominion. J3utyou would say such ac(juir'^ments arealways superfluous, sometimes dangerous, in a race proscril)e(l, in a class whose predestined mission isthoughtto hethe hewing of wood and drawing of water. I might point with pride or sorrow, according to the pre- dominance of the faculties thus manifested, to the heaj)S of abuse and slander that have been pilef his country. Besides the foregoing.there are two other reasons which appear to me to justify the reasonable ex- })ectation that the great divisions — national and religious elements — which characteri.se our society should be fully and fairly repre- sented in the conduct of public atiairs ; (1.) That each class ccm- tributes to the revenue more in i)roportion to numbers than any arbitrary social classification ; and (2.) that while man is imperfect and tlesh frail, individuals will, as a rule, feel more at ease when their interests are in the keeping of their brethren than in the hands of strangers, if I may use the exj)ression. The reason is (|uite obvious. Therefore I take it, the share, which any of the great divisions of our society founded on national and religious differences, has in the management of public affairs is a good cri- terion of its political status — an accurate measure of its influence in society. It is by this standard that I propose in the following jiages to gauge the position of Irish Catholics as a numerous con- stituent of th i Canadian people. It would be better such ex- traneous distinctions were merged in a Canadian nationality — a con- sunmiation devoutly to be wished for. But in redressing a griev- ance, in efi'ecting a reform, we must deal with society as we find it, and not as v'_' would wish it to be, always ho .ng that it may be gradually developed to its fullest perfection. Territorial Divisions. This inquiry shall embrace the Provinces now constituting " old" Canada, and the Dominion Capital. lor convenience of examina- tion I shall divide it into four territorial divisions, numbered res- pectively 1, 2, 3 and 4. Territorial Division No. 1 shall consist of the counties on either side bordering on the Ottawa River. J i f t ■' 10 Territorial Division No. 2 shall (!Oin|)riHo the Province *.'f On- tario. Territorial JJivision No. 'A shall (Consist of tin; Province of Quob(!e. Territorial Division No. 4> shall inehi(l<> the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec iinder Federal authority, the Metropolis of Canada and a few reference,' to the whole Dominion. My limires shall be taken from the public records, and 1 trust that it sTiall appear that my deductions are the natural inferences, the logical conclusions from these figures. publk; emi'loyees. My classificaiion of the public fimploycfiti and of the population HhiiU be partly artifirial, partly natural — artificial as founded on reliirious differences, natural on distinctions of nationality. I shall divide the whole f)Opulation conformably with its two great reli- gious sections — Catholic and Protestant — for all other distinctions seem minor p(:rturbations, like the rip])le on a wave, and merge in these. The former I shall sub-divide into P^nglish and French- s{)eaking. The whol" '''nglish-sj>eaking sub-division I shall desig- nate Irish, as the overwhelming mnjority belong to that nation- ality, and the PVench-speaking Catholics, French. TEURITOllIAL DIVISION NO. 1. The 1st Territorial Division I shall sub-divide into the Southeni and Northern Districts. THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT shall comf)rise tlu; City of Ottawa and counties of Prescott, Russell, Carleton and Renfrew — all in the Province of Ontano. THE NOllTHEUN DISTRICT Cx)nsists of the counties of Arion of all the Officials in tlie Southern District appointed under Municipal and Cognate Authority. 1st. part, OTTAWA CITY. Catholic. Protontant. Service By whom appointed. Irish. Kn^ncli. City Clerk Municij^al Council " " 1 " Chamberlain " " " " I " Collector of Taxes ' " " " 1 " Engineer " " " " 1 of Bridges " " '• " 1 ' Clerk of works of Bridges " " " " 1 " High Bailiff " " " " 1 " Solicitor " " " " 1 " Inspector of Schools " " " " 1 12 H i"'! Cit3^ ilK K (( <( (( (( II l( If (I (I l< « l( u <( Kervlco. By whom appolnUd. Health Inspector " " Firo In8i)ector " assiHtant " Health Wardens " Assessors " Chief of Police Auditors " Overseers of street labourers " P]ngineer s man " High School Trustees " Secretary of Water Coraraissioners Engineer " " assistant " " License Inspector, Police Commissioners Detectives " " Police Sergeants '' " Clerk of Police Court, Police magistrate High School Teachers, High School Trustees " Secretary " " Treasurer Total Catholic. Prot«8Utit Iriiih. French. <( i( 1 t< 1 II i( 1 1 « 1 2 te«Unl A ttorney-General'H Departiiuuit — Chief clerk, &c. « 2 Messen^'er, &c. 1 1 Provincial Secretary's Assistant and Chief Clerk, K 2 " Retjfistrar's Chief Chirks, Messengers, &c.. J 21 Penitentiary — f'lerka Ai'i'liitcct Store-k(H^|)or and sc^hool-niaster Rockwood Asylum — Warden Art'liitects (Mork and store-keeper Superior (\)»n-t.s — Judj^es County " " " Assistants Catholic Pr<)t«tUnl. II 2 10 36 3 04 872 Total Federal (Mnployces for Ontnno Catholic to r^-oto.stant Federal employees in Province of Ontario as 1 to 14 po])ulation " " " 1 " 6 By salaries the dispr(jportion would be very largely increased. 3lll). I'AIIT— i-E(JISLATIVK. 2 2 8 24 1 60 1 4 1 1 1 i>J 5 77 5 as 1 to 15 (i 1 " 5 u 1 " 5 (( 1 " 5 39 994 64 872 House of Assembly Executive — Ministers Catholic to Protestant members in Ontario " " population " Ministers " " j)()pulati()n " Total employees Local (government of Ontario « " Federal Public service " 103 1720 Catholic to Protestant employees " a« 1 to 17 liopulation " " 1 " 5 The salaries would stand in the proportion of about 1 to 100. TERRITORIAL DISTRICT, NO. 3. The third Territorial District consists of the Province of Que- bec, formerly called Lower Canada or Canada East. The English and French-speaking Catholics and the Protestants are respectively assumed to bear the same I'atio to one another now as in 1801. POPULATION. Quebec, CathoUc Protestan'i. Total Irish French (1801—90,414 840,320 107,930 1,110,004 I 1871— 103,200 907,000 180,245 1,190,505 t 4 22 TAHI.K VII. ConcjiinH a Liat of Local arxJ Ke 1 3 3 2 1 1 Legislative Employees — Clerks of both Houses " Assistant „ Chief Office Clerks, &c. 1 11 Clerks, Writers Messengers, &c. Total EmployecB, Legislation. Quebec 4 32 4 I 7 70 5 b 3 20 2 8 4 4 7 1 ID 6 3 I 1 1 2 2 18 231 97 .( 1 1 a 2 1 1 11 4 2 10 1 1 8 1 a iT 24 m ( ')ilh<.: i..N. rr.-;t:;i.UMI««. Iri.ih. Kreiich. Totnl Fimf)loyoo.s C'ivil Sorviofv Qiiclmr LS 177 70 Adriiiiiistratioriof .)'n.Hti(;o,^c. " 18 2.SI U7 Total Einplo/ocH by Loffil Oovornincn*. " .'}'> 440 175 Irish to Fn^n(;!i to' VioioMnut " an 1 to 12J to 5 population " " " 1 " 9 " l\ 2Nr) F'AKT— AIM'OfNTMKNTS I'.Y FKDKKAL (;()ViaiNMKNT. ill I !4'' .)'M ^'ivil S(!rvi(;(', (Out.Hido) - (Jity I'o.stiiia.sicrs " A.s.si.stants Ist class ( 'I(!rkH 2r!(l " " :}n) " 4t}i " " \,(:. Letter CaJ-riofH, MosHf;!)- gers, (&(;. Morifiy-ordor Post- II WIS tors OuHtoms — ( 'oiler; tors Surv(!y(;is ]/iH(liii('' Waiters (Klerks l're.veritiv(! Oflieers Suh-(JollectorH A p [ ) ra i se I'H ji, rn 1 A ss i s tan Lh Lof;kers nud Assistaiitn Tide Survf^yors ^ Messenffers, fee. F'iXeise — CollcetorH Deputies, &r. I'iXeisernfiJi (;ierks Wateliinen, <( 4 4 1 4 1 .S 11 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 ! 2 1 (( 1 'i (1 1 I (< 4 4 tt 1 1 u '( 1 1 17 11 4 44 ^ (< 2 I ^ 25 It r Post, Of}i(;o — InHpfctorH nnd y\Hsistnrit Tot!)! I)('(JlJ(:t l\l(;,SHf!ri<^('l'H, &C. flat.bollfB. ProtMUnU Ir1«S. French. " 1 2 2 2 .'{ I I ()} l\r, 20.') !(; 22 H ■ 47 l!K} lf)7 fris}) to Fnnich and to Pn.ti-Htntit Kinijloyocs as I to 4.] U. 4i i'oi.iilat,i(.t) " I " .') " \\ AdiiiiniHtiJition of.IuHtico- (»)iit' 12 fj:} 21.") 20") Tot.'il Ktri|p|oy('CS(>rF<'d('ral(Jovciiini,(:rit.iri<^,Ufd)(!'r 0.'> 2.*)0 217 D(;(Ju(;L M<'.ss(!M<'(;rs, iV(;. hi 22 H Total, r;xcluHivc of M(;.s.scri(,'<-i-s 4't 20S 20!> Proportion of Mniployf^cs Irisli to Fr<'nf:li ;ind to l'rotcst;uit flH I t,o 4^ to H Population '^ " " as I in ff to \\ 'M\\) I'AHT — i,K(;FSFw\TIVK, Lofdslativf! (V)uri(;il ('nomiriMtod " A,SH 14 ' Cxoru ti V(5 — M i n istcr's Irish to VwnrV. to Pi-ot(;st;int Lc;^dslativc <^'oi]n''il- lorH, Qneho';, jik 1 to H lo .S Population " 1 " !> " U Mfinl)orHofAii.Hond>ly 1 " 24/, " 7 Population '•' I " !* " It TKKIlfTOUIAI, DIVFSfoN No. 4. The fourth Torjitr»rial ])ivi.sion sIimII rr)rnpiis(! the l)oniinion of (*anada, so f,'w ii.s tlie inside; ('ivipl Sc,ivir(; a,nd the Lcffi.slatur*,-. TABLK VJII. f "ontains a List of pfifleral Employees at the Dominion Capital and Leidslature. 26 iHT PART — FEDERAL EMPLOYEES. CathollL. Irish. French. ■ t:1 >;■! m I Civil Service — Department of Justice — Dej^uty-Minister " Clerks Messemjerii 2 " Militia k Defence — Deputv & Chief Clerks Adjutaiit-Ueneral. Deputy and As- sistant-Deputies, &c. Clerks, &c. 2 Messetujc/rs, d-c. 2 Secretary of State — Deputy, Chief Clerks and Heads of Branches " Cleriis, &c. '' Messengers, dx. 2 " " for Provinces — Assistant and Chief Clerks " Clerks, &c. Messengers, d'c." Receiver-Oenerars Department — Deputy & Chief Clerk Clerks 2 Messengers I " — Deputies and Chief Clerks 1 Clerks 2 Messengers, d-c. 3 - Deputy & Chief C!.rk C;crks 1 Messengers, Sc. 2 —Deputy & Chief Clerk Clerks I Messengers 2 — Deputy & Chief Clerks Clerks, iScc. 5 Messengers, c&c. 1 — Deputy & Chief Clerks Clerks, &c. 6 Messengers, dc. 2 Finance Customs Inland Revenue Public Works Post Office ProMMeont' 1 5 3 20 8 7 Am 1 2 2 5 7 1 1 i. i 3 8 <( 2 u 2 2 5 I ti n 4 I 24 (( 1 1 1 3 U li 1 n 2 a 13 2 3 11 11 2 rcte«Uuiik» 1 Governor's Privy Council 1 1st class Clerks, home 3 2nd " " " 7 3rd " " &c. " 4 Office Keepers, &c. 1 3 10 4 13 1 1 ii 2 i\ 4 1 3 «t 2 1 14 a 2 <( 2 lic. Protestant. Irish. French, 1 4 2 2 2 1 8 12 1 I) 12 6 12 15 " Kinj)loyees, Deduct Mes.sen<^ers, etc. 8 32 12 47 :5 2 20 32 (38 8 104 32 854 47 70 28 130 33 401 33 I 48 103 308 oRD PART — I.Er.ISLATURE. Senate (nominated) — Ontario Qiiebec Nova Scotia New Brunswick Manitoba British Columbia Total Senators House of Counnons (ele/tive) — Ontario Catholic. Iri.sli. French. 1 " Prot«stM»t 23 2 10 1 I* 11 1 li 11 it 1 2 u (t 4 17 57 -Ontario 3 i( 79 Quel)ec 4 42 19 New Brunswick o 1 12 Nova Scotia 4 u 15 Manitol)a a 1 2 British Columbia a U (i Total Members Privy Council — Ministers Chief Executive— ( Jovernor-Cener.al Provincial '* — Lieutenant-Cunernors 13 44 133 3 10 1 20 T have not included the employees of the nmritirae Provinces, because I am not sufficiently acquainted with the conduct of public affairs in these, to warrant me it> offering any opinion on them. THE TABLES. These tables I have compiled with the most scrupulous regard to accuracy. It is quite possible that, despite every care, some trifling errors may have inadvertently crept in. These, if any, I feel assured, will balance each other, and their combined effect would not appreciably alter the general result. I am aware that the list is far from complete, owing to no remissness of mine, but from the paucity of the documents. I regret this, for the fuller it were the more irrefutable my position. The Liberal Government. J^ Before entering into an analysis of the preceding Tables, I de- sire to call attention to the very important fact, that, since the ac- cession to power of the Conservative party in 1854, four hundred and ninety -five first-class ap})ointments, exclusive of promotions, have been made, of which the incumbents are now in possession. These appointments include Judges, Police Magistrates, Sheriffs, County Attorneys, Clerks of the Peace and Crown, Registrars, and, in Lower Canada prothonotaries and coroners, and all employees, local and federal, receiving salaries of $1200 a year and upwards. They are exclusive of the outer members of the Confeiieracy. Of these four hundred and ninety-five appoint- ments, four hundred and fifty-five have been made by the Conser- vatives, and the remaining forty by the Liberals, during the lat- ter's brief reign of twenty-two months — from May 1862 to March 1864. Of these 455 appointments by the (Jonservative party, nine have been conferred on Iri.-sh Catholics, if I may include therein the temjiorary appointment of Mr. Macarow as one. They are Messrs Kelly, O'Neil, Sexton, Alley n, Tims, Hayes, Quinn and Doran. This is somewhat less than one out of every fifty, while the pop- ulation is nearly one to seven. Of tiie forty appointments made by the Reform ()aruy, four M'ere Irish Catholics — Messrs. O'Gara, O'Brien, Drummond and McCoru. This is equivalent to one out of ten. To a full and thorough appreciation of their generous dealing, it must not be forgotten that a large majority of the Irish Catholics were arra3'^e(i against that Government at the polls. Nor does this cover the full extentof their liberality. It will be seen that they appointed but one Protestant to any impor- tant olTice in Lower Canada. This arose from their already en- joying more than a just and equitable jjortion. They also dis- • T' 30 missed many loadiriir Orangonieii from vory lucrative offices, of whom three recur to inernory : — Mr. Oji^Ie R. Gowan, Toronto; Mr. Francis Clemow, Post Otiice lns})octor, Ottawa ; and Mr. Alex- ander Powell, Crown Timber Agent, Barrio. Comment is unneces- sary. Be it far from me to recall the past and its errors, which should lie buried with it, for the |)ur[)ose of embi(iteringthe present. Tiie lessons o^ the past are useful in serving as beacons and finger-boards to guide us in the future. The only practi'^al way of judging parties and individuals is by a calm, unbiassed review of their antecedents. " By their works shall you know them." '■' Tlio tree is known by its fruit." Analysis of thk Tabl?:s. The foregoing taV)les are at once instructive and suggestive. Instructive, because they establisli beyond do»i})t the inferiority of our position, b(;cause they demonstrate witli mathematical pre- cision our degraded standing ; suggestive, because they imply and point out a lemedy. The first part of Tables 1, 2 and 3 res[)ectively, show the posi- tion Catholics occupy in a city where they have a numerical pre- ponderance. In the Municipal Government there is not a Catholic in the enjoyment of any office beyond the reach or ambition of an ordinary day labourer. There is one first-class appointm.ent \mder the Local Government—Police Magistrate — thanks to the Reform Government. In the city appointments under the Federal Gov- ernment, neither a 1st, 2nd, nor 8rd class appointment is held by a Catholic. Of the 89 first and second-class appointments in this city, under the Municipal, Li>cal and Federal authority, exclusive of the civil service })roper, only one (the Police Magistrate) is held by a Catliolic. Catholics in this instance have not had their ordi- nary success in obtaining a fair share even of the messengers, doorkeepers, &c , for which, one would infer, they were elegantly adapted. We contribute our share to the maintenance of the High School, yet though in a majority in this city we have not a single representative on the Board. Would it be wonderful if our children should grow up in ignorance and crime ? The converse looks indeed like the miraculous interposition of Providence. We arein the same dependent position in the Counties of Prescott, Russeli, Carleton and Renfrew. In these four Counties wo have not a ^"ngle Catholic holding any appointment, except coroner, in the .ministration of Justice, nor any 1st class appointment in the /il service. (Mr. Doran belongs to Nipissing District.) All the a^ ointments in the Southern District, except ten, have been made bv the Conservatives since 18.')4. Of these ten, four were 31 made by tlio Macdonalrl-Dorion Govoniinont, and the letiiaining '^\x were antecedent to 1854. Of thoso four, two are Irish Catho- lics. In fact, of five appointments in this district, made by the Liberal party, three were Catholics — Messrs. O'Gara and Devine and the late Dr. Riel. To the second part of my subject (Legisla- tion) properly belongs an e.K))lanation of the anomalous position of the City of Ottawa — the minority ruling the majority, aye, with A rod of iron too— a thing unj^recedented on this continent. The Northern DisiRirT. Let us now turn to the Northern District, in which Catholics form at leapt five-eighths of the population. Do we find any im- provement ? Table V. eloquently, tliough silently, answers that question. We find that of !)2 appointments, 20 are held by Cath- olics. Of these, ten are held by Irish Catholics, not one of which is first -elaKs. Of the three appointmentsmade in this district by the Liberal Government of 1803, two are Irish Catholics (Messrs. McCord and Lynch.) It may be considered that I have given imusual prominence to the first Territorial Division, and that I am unnece.ssarily prolix and exhaustive in dealing witli it. I have done so for four reasons : (1.) because I am more intimately acquainted with the entire lo- cality than any other [)oition of the Dominion, and can therefore speak from [lersonal knowledge ; (2.) because it is, if I may so express it, the home, the stronghold of Conservatism in Canada ; (8.) because of the population, a greater proportion are Irish Catholics than of an equal number in any other part of the Do- minion ; and (4.) because the Southern District has a greater pro- portion of Catholics than any other section of Ontario. It will be observed that of the twenty-one legislators sent by this Division to the Local and Federal Parliaments, one onlyis a Catholic, although there are about 91 C/atholics to 83 Protestants. Of these 21 legislators, one only h a Reformer. Ottawa city and Prescott County elected their last liberal representatives in 1851. Neither Carleton, Russell, Argenteuil nor Pontiac has ever disgi-aced itself by so injudicious a choice, and Renfrew and Ottawa counties oscillate between the two — the latter has not chosen a liberal member since 1858. The Protestant element in the municipal council of the Cit}?^ of Ottawa has, since 18.55 — a year memoi'able in our local aniials for the ascendancy of the minority over the majority— been exclusively Conservative. There- fore it is no exaggeration to call the first territorial Division the home, the stronghold of Conservatism. Here can we look at Conservatism in its normal condition. Here we can examine it in its native dignity. Here, undisturbed by extraneous causes,uninfluenced by external jn-essure, unswayed w^ 32 <«.■ P by foreign coercion, sliould wo look for exainjiles of its liberality to Catholics, by whom it luus been l.iigely and faithfully hus- tainod. Here, where it has so lonj^ reigned supreme, it can V) fairly, lionestly and impartially judged by its fiuit. What then do ve find ? We find that here, basking in the yunshino of un- disputed sway, wallowing in undisturbed supremacy, it has not^ during its long reign of sixteen years, ap|)ointed a single Catholic to any im[)ortant office in the civil service or achninistration of justice of this Division. Its nominees, instead of being Conser- vatives characterized by education, enlightenment, moderation and efficiency, have been mostly Oningemen of the violent and ignorant class. Yes, it is an incontrovertible fact that here, where Catholics are in a majority, is Orangeism, not of the mild, respect- able stamp, but that which is characterized by violence and ig- norance, the guiding spirit of the Tory party. These are our ex- periences of Toryism ; and are strictly in accord with its history in unfortunate Ireland. I wish to be distinctly understood that in any reference to Orangemen, I am speaking of the institution, and not of individual members, for I believe that Orangemen, when let alone, are like all other men— neither better nor worse. Catholics in thi; locality have lost all ccmfidence in the honest, impartial administration of justice. They feel in the law no security for the protection of their lives or properties. When the issue is between them and Orangemen, they believe that trial by jury is "a mockery, a delusion and a snare." This unfor- tunately is the universal feeling among all classes of Catholics. Such unanimity cannot be founded on prejudices or based on chi- meras. It is sustained by stubborn facts. In January, 1855, Tierney, an inoffensive old man, was mur- dered in the presence of many persons, and not one of his as- sassins was put on trial for the crime. The circumstances of this murder were of a most aggravated character. As told at the time, a number of Orangemen ware riding past a tavern, kept by a Catholic, shouting, "to hell with the Pope," and making other joyous demonstrations. The inmates returned the taunt, where- upon the Orangemen alighted from their sleighs, entered the house, demolished its contents and murdered poor Tierney, who acci- dentally happened to be there at the time. Tierney was murdered, but no coroner ever held an inquest. It took several months before a magistrate could begot with suf- ficient courage to issue a warrant for the arrest of the par- ties charged with the murder. When the warrant was finally obtained, (some time during the ensuing summer,) no effectual effort at apprehension was made, but on the morning the "fall" assizes opened, the culprits surrendered. The Crown witnesses, who swore to their identity, were not only unheed- ed, but wera sought to be intimidated by threats from the Grand 38 Jury of inclictinent for perjury. So eHCuped they without oven having l)0(;ii put on trial ! Ahoiit the same i'unv there was a failureof justice in the Cor- rij^an case in Quebec h}' the indietnicnt and accjuittal of tlie ac- cused. The j)ress of the country were justly indi<,mant at this failure of justice,and some went so far as to charge (^'athoiics as a body with being abettors of murder. But not a note, not a mur- mur of condenination of those who nmrdercd unfortunate Ticrney. These men — magistrates, jurors and murderers — are the most Conservative of C'onservativ'es. Some seven or eight years ago, another Catholic named Keogli, was, at Metcalfe Village, murdereti in broad daylight in the presence of many ))eisons. The coroner's jury founcl a verdict of wilful murder against a certain ])erson therein named. He, too, was never arrested. He followed the example of those accused of Tierney's murder, and surrendered on the opening of the assizes. There was a trial for manslaughter only on this occasion. He was acquitted. No voice was raised on account of this failure of justice. Every one concerned was a Conservative par excellence— real "true blue" Conservatives. MAGISTRATES AND VOLUNTEERS. The justices of the peace and volunteers (rank and file) are not only almost exclusively Protestant, but they are nearly all Orange men. Writing the parliamentary correspondence of the Ottawa Tribune from Quebec in 1855, I took occasion to condemn the Militia Bill, as being intended to put arras into the hands of the Orangemen of Upper Canada. The editor, the late and lamented Mr. Burke, differed from my view, but my friend lived long enough to acknowledge his error, afterwards often telling me that I waa right and he was lurorig. Shortly after the passage of that mea- sure, Orange companies were being organized on all sides. The French inhabitants of this city were also permitted to organize a company composed exclusively of that nationality. The Irish Catholics took alarm — they had not forgotten " stony Monday" — at this display of hostile armament. It was thus they viewed it. The leading supporters of the Conservatives amongst them sought the intervention of the Government for permissior» to organize a com- pany to be chiefty officered and composed of Irish Catholics. The leaders of this movement proclaimed in anticipation a successful issue. They were not only doomed to disappointment, but to the humiliation of not being treated with the common courtesy of a reply to their application. All the parties to these transactions were good,leal and sound Conservatives. Few can realise, shortof personal experience, the petty tyranny and persecution exercised by igno- rant, bigoted magistrates in the back-woods over poor, unfriended 3 n 34 settlers. Some instances of a most galling character have in my profcHsional intentourse with the oiitsk iris ot civilization come un- der my notice. The perpetrators were all sound Tories of the good old type, and brimful of the gitod old traditions. Now, reader, this is an Ottawa experience of Canadian Toryism. Com- pare it with the circle of your immediate rccjuaintance. Can it in your locality claim a fairer or better record '( TKimiTORIAL DIVISION NO. 2. Turn we now to table VI, and we find that it is but a stale and monotonous ref)etition of the preceding ones. The same pi'o.scrip- tion characterizes it, the same ostracism prevails throughout. The cloven hoof of Conservatism is everywhere visible, the same blighting inHuences on all sides apparent. But a brighter vJ«iorj/ breaks o'er Ontario's woods and Jakes. A new hojie has beamed on us. A small, brilliant speck is just visible on the Eastern hor- izon of our political tirmaineiit. Dawn is imperceptibly vanquish- ing darkness, the lowering sky indicates symptoms of returning calm, anil the sun of e(piality may shine on us yet. 1'h • Reform ])arty have succeeded to power. As Ikus ever been its wont, the first a(;t of the party was the introduction of an Irish Catholic in- to the Government. True to their ])iinciples, consistent with their teachings, faithful to their traditions they hasten to make us ])ar- takers of their power as well as what we were before, contributors, to the revenue. Had they acted otherwise, they would have dis- appointed their friends, falsified their lUHxims, aspersed their prin- ciples, and would be unworthy the contidence of those supporters;, who believe as I do. TERRITORIAL DIVISION NO. 3. Turn we now to Mew France, which imagination has invested with the mantle, attributes and associations of the old. Imbued with that historii! sympathy between Erin and Gaul— a sympathy cemented by blood at Aughrim, Fontenoy, and many another bat- tle-6eld, a syanpathy sanctitied by religious asylum, a sympathy- consecrated by the memories of Sarstield, Tone and Emmett, we turn with a feeling of relief to Quebec, as the spot of all others on this continent where an Irish Catholic may well feel at home. A glance at table VII, dispels the illusion. We find that this is not the France of yore, she is new-born France no more. LEGISLATORS. The Province of Quebec has 178 legislators, of whom 8 are Irish Catholics, and 45 Protestants. Of the 130 elective members there 35 Irish there: is not a sin^jlo constituoncy in which t]u3 Frcnnli olomont prod.nni- natos rcproHtjnted by an Irish (.'athoUc, althoufrh many such ai'e represented Ky ProtostantH. It in usual wlienever an Iiish Catholic candi(hito presents himself hefoiH; any coustibuetiey hav- ing a considerahh- French vott\ tor them to join with the I'rotos- tants for his ch^feat. In thci Quehcic (Jovei'ninent, Irish (,^itholic.S liave not a representative, while the Protestants have two. Thouj^h the party of />o(/My>/'/ n(;//)^'.s have been in power with litth; interreg- num since l.sr)4, tli<;y have oidy i)romoted one (.)ud«fe Maguire) and appointed another (Ilecorder Sexton) to tli(! administi'ation of justice, while in the same time they have appointed !) Pi'otestant judges. Of all the first-class appointments in Lower Canada enu- merated in the 1st part of Table VII, iinder local authority, there are only two Irish Catholics, (Messrs Alleynatid Sexton) a[)pointed by the Conservative paity, while there are ')(> Protestants. (Jf all the first-class appointments in the 2nd part of the name table, only one Irish ( -atholic, (Mr. Quinn) has been app(»inte(l by the (dir- tier party, while thtjy aj)j>ointe(l no less than 2.) Protestants. (!'on- trast this with the conduct of the Liberal ))arty (the lioiKjca a.s they ar(! disdainfully called), (un-ing their short term of office, and it is seen that they ap])ointed three Irish Catholics (Judge Druin- mond, and Messrs O'Brien and McCord) to most important offices, and only one Protestant. I confess that I, too, w!is for a long time, influenced by this tra- ditional leaning to Frenchmen, until n)y eyes were opened by see- ing my countrymen systematically ignored and sneered at l>y Sir George Cartier, Protestant Englishmen preferred to them and raised over thfcir heads. In my own cfinvass for the County of Russell in 1867, some of my bitterest opponents were French Canadians. They had no hesitation in preferring a Protestant. This could not have arisen from any personal enmity to me, for I was a total stranger to them, nor had I ever done aught to deserve their hos- tility. They seemed to take a |)ernicious delight in flinging " Fenian" at myself and supiWiters. Their organ in Ottawa was denouncing me in every i.ssue as a " Fenian." They were no doubt acting under instructions from their leader, Sir George — the Englishman speak i 7 l(J French, who contemptuously tells the Irish, "that he did not want them, that he would not have them." I would be the last man to take exce[)tion to legitimate party war- fare, but surely the French might leave the false and unfounded " Fenian" cry to others. There was only one way in which my name could have ])ossibly been connected with that formidable organiza- tion — on the Orange theory, that every Irish Catholic must be a " Fenian" or " Fenian sympathizer." Yet, Lower Canada is the pink of Conservatism. Her chosen chiefs are its most redoubted champions. About two-thirds of her representatives have foi years been its most devoted defenders, singularly forgiving and 30 forjTotful of its tyranny nno(ir (•on.s(»l»ition of being sliarcrs in tlw j»hni(l«>r. "St. .lean liMjttist*!" the "monkey," and "Pat" the " cMtspaw." It .scem.s manifcsl to me tlmt any one whf) Ims closely watcluul and critically analysed |iolitical events in Lowei' Caiindu for the last ei;^ditecn years, can form lnit one con- clusion as to which l>arty is the Irnc friend of Irish Catholics in that I'lovince, and that a verdict foimded on the ividence and on \mdis|)iitable facts must be unanimous in favour of the Liberal party. TKRRITOUIAL DIVISION NO. 4. Let us now retrace our steps, and take a peep at the pn-at " ung ivnm " at Dominion Head-cpiarters. Table VIM will furnish us with an index, a clue, a guide in our sc.irch for adventtires. With this in hand we enter tlie Eastern block, and inspect the fantastic pile from basement to attic. In our wanderings we encounter the germs homo in all its diversity of form, colour and tongue. We readily recognize the babbling Frenchman, the " blawsted" cockney, the Gaelic of the Highlands, the lowland ^x/^o/.v, that the genius of Burns has stamped with immortality, and its twin-sister of the " black North." We miss the congenial and familiar "brogue." But no, we found one in the basement and another in the attic — rare specimens specially imported for exhibition. Whither- soever you turn, in hall or corridor, you encounter what legendary lore tells us Dean Swift found written on the walls of Bandon, and beneath which he inscribed his celebrated epigram : — " Whoever wrote this, hvith a cruelty and barbarism unsur- passed in the blackest aged of persecution, the recital of which would make humanity shudder, and the consecjuences are singu- larly corroborative of the statement, for one went forth from the dungeon to a madhouse, and another to an untimely grave. How, after months of incarceration and unheard of severity they were let loose without a trial, without knowing with what they were charged, or the person of their accuser, but with the stain of guilt, as far as such a process could effect it, on their bi'ows, their pros- pects blighted, bankruptcy their portion, and self-expatriation their doom — and all because of their political opinions. Because in 1867 they ventured to think for themselves and act accordingly. Because it was likely that they would become honest leaders of their class, it was desirable to hunt them out of the country, and teach other delinquents a lesson that may be of service in the future. They have, however, cause to be thankful that they did not follow Whelan. Had the Government thought proper to pursue the same course towards these as they did to Whelan, as sure as " like causes pro- duce like effects," they could have procured their conviction just as surely. Nay, did the Government desire to be avenged of me for writing this pamphlet, they could indict me for the murder of McGee, and calculate with certainty on a conviction by pursu- ing the same course as they did towards Whelan, and not me only, but five hundred others, one after another indiscriminately selected, I am not discussing Whelan's guilu or innocence. Of that I am in entire ignorance, nor is it essential to my argument. But I do assert that Whelan was convicted before the Jury panel was struck. It has not been accounted for that, though at least oue-fourth of the Jurors of Carleton are Irish Catholics, thei'e were only six on a panel of sixty. The few Catholics on the panel were challenged by the " eminent " counsel for the Crown — they could not be depended on to render an honest verdict on their oaths according to the evidence. When a Protestant was on trial for the murder of Keogh, he had an exclusively Protestant Jury, and when a Catholic is arraigned for murder, he also must be tried by a Protestant Jury. One would suppose that this rule should work both ways. That if a Protestant indicted for mur- der must be tried by a Protestant Jury, in all fairness a Catholic should be tried by a Catholic Jury. I say further, that were 46 I I k Wholan any other than an Irish Catholic, the Government would not dare to execute him after /olli' out of 7ii)ie — I exchide the Ju(l<((i hetore whom the trial was conducted — on appeal declaring that Ay; skali (jet (i 'new tr'ud. It was a strictly Vl'ory victory. It is t(»o Hoon to forget how, at the " Fenian" trials in Toronto, the priest was coin'icLed and the minister acquitted, although the evidence of guilt was in inverse ratio : — another CWservative triumph. In that season of trial, when stout hearts quailed, when every har\d was raised against us, there was one man who was not afiaid to stand by us, and hurl anathema at the tyiant. That mun is the Hon. Malcolm (Jameron — one of nature's nobles. For this the good man got his reward by being dismissed from the Queen's printership at the earliest opi)ortunity. In this great man — foi' if the "good alone are great," he is truly great — Irish Catholics have no truer or better friend on this Continent. Yet, strange fatality, they signify their appreciation of it by opposing him on every occasion that he has sought their suffrages. Our Lord, on the cross of Calvaiy, prayed for those who ci'ucilied him, saying: — " Father forgive them, they know not what they do." We might re|)eat here His Divine example. The G7o/>6 was the only paj)er who had a woid of condemnation of this cruelty. No doubt it was afraid to say much, lest it, too, might be branded as a " Fenian" sympathizer. CONFEDERATION. In the "British North America Act" of 18G7, called the Con- federation Act, special constitutional privileges are secured to the Protestant minority of Quebec. Twelve constituencies are set apart, whose boundaries cannot be altered except with the con- currence of a majority of their representatives. These are what may be denominated Protestant eo unties. But as if they deter- mined to add insult to injury, the majority of the population of five of these Protestant counties res[)ectively is Catholic, some of them, as the County of Ottawa, nearly three to one. The five electoiul counties which the constitution by inference lias falsely declared to be Protestant are Ottawa, Pontiac, Sheffbrd, Megantic and Richmond, and Wolfe. Were the people of these counties thus scandalized because at the time they happened to be represented by Pi'otestant Conservative members ? Why was not Chateau- guay so treated ? Is it because it was represented by a Pro- testant Liberal ? But the most extraordinary feature of this strange transaction is that their wealth and influence with a pre- ponderance in all the other Provinces was not deemed sufHcient protection for the Protestant minority of Quebec, but must invoke 47 •y- o. lat tho con-stitution for special guarantees. How provident, what foresight, what precaution against the whims or prejudices of the majority. May we ask why some such conces.sions were not se- cured for the Catholic minority of Ontario ? The answer is evident. Because they were friendless in a Conservative Government. I will venture to say that if any one had raised the issue, they would cry shame, hUjot; why distrust the honour of the Pro- testant miijority ? But there is no shame when a Protestant doubts the honour of a Catholic majority. OTTAWA CITY. I now come to an explanation of the anomalous position of the City of Ottawa, where the minority rule the majority, aye, with a rod of iron, too, as demonstrated in Table I. — a thing unj)rece- dented fi'om Cape Horn to Behring's Straits. In IS.H the Muni- cipal Council of the Town of Bytown petitioned the Legislature to be incorporated as a city, to be called the " City of Ottawa." As is usual in such circumstances, they ])re[)ared their own Vyi^Z, sub-dividing the ])roposed city into five wards, and describing their resjiective boundaries. The Goverimient during the progress of the Bill, contrary to all precedent, changed the boundaries of the wards at the instance of their supporters, in such a maimer that the Protestant minority could control a majority of the new wards. By this arrangement the minority were assigned three wards, while the majority had (mly two ; and so dexteiously had it been managed that the majority has ever since been unable to regain its lost rights. I^ot content with robbing us they must insult us also. They denominated the Protestant wards St. George, Victoria and Wellington, and the Catholic ones, Bn and Ottaioa. This accounts for the proportion of three Protestants to two Catholics in the City Council, which has since been main- t'^ined. The first act of the new Council was to dismiss every Catholic em- ployee, even to the messenger; and have still adhered to the same intolerant spirit as exhibited in Table I. The same anhniis char- acterized them in school management, so that the majority, contrary to the spirit, if not the letter of the law, had to resort to separate schools with all their disadvantages. All the actors in these dis- reputable transactions were Conservatives of the right stripe. In the seventeen years whicl> have since elapsed I can only recall one Protestant of the Reform party holding a seat in the Council. I am reasonably hopeful that the Liberal party will hasten to do us justice, and carry out to its legitimate conclusion the great prin- ciple of " representation by population." Will the Catholics of Ontario strengthen our hands by a generous, united support at the polls ? 48 NEW nilUNSWICK SCHOOL LAW. a I '"«! Jl' V',. Who that lias watched tlioir ooiuhict in t\u) hitc S(^HHi()ti with Teference to the Nt'W Brun.swick School Law can be .satisficfl with their douhlo dealing, their Hhuftling, their vacillating. Contrast their minerabh! HubUirtuges to save theii' salai'ics with the manly, straightibrward course of Miissrs. Blake and Mackenzie^ MesHrs. Dorion and Holton. Have you observed tlu^ niearf, cowardly, truckling tei'giversations of" that Catholic jxir c.ict'/lence — (dis) Hon. Hector L. Langevin, C. B. {Cnipaud lileu) — who evidtnitly much prefers his office and j)ickings to his honour and the desire to see simple justice done to his co-religionists of New lirujiswick ? For my own part J am neither surprised nor disappoint(!d at the result, for it is quite consistent with all theii- antecedents. Did they act otherwise it would be just cause for wonder. Surely the people's eyes must at last open to their treachery —sui-ely this last measure of injustice will fill their cup of ini(|uity to over- flowing. CAUSES OF INFERIORITY. Hi I think that any one who carefullv reads the foregoing tables must be convinced that Irish Catholics occupy an inferior and de- graded position in Canada, and that after a perusal of my review of these tables he cannot fail to ascribe it to Conservative supre- macy in the management of public affairs. Some may despair and say : — " We are in a hopeless minority, and how can we better ourselves ?" This is an entire mistake, we are not in a hopeless minority, and we can bette^' ourselves ; and by our own unaided effort elevate ourselves to an equality with the pry. is) ■ly rebuke her oppressors ; nnd if all this is chnnged to-day, it is pain- ful to add that truth compels us to acknowledge, that wo have ourselves in a very ijreat degree to blame for it. With an infatuation inexijlieable, in deHance of every prudent conrider- ation, setting aside the useful lessons of history, we joined hands with our hereditary foe. This nee jssion inereased its strength, power and vitality a hundred-fold. But, as opposites cannot simultaneously exist side by side without one encroaching upon, and ultimately destroying, the other, so as it grew strong, wo ^rew proportionally weak, as it giew powerful, we grew power- less. Like complementary quantities, the increjise of the one was the diminution of the other, the ultimate point or zero of the one being the infinity of the other. Elated by victory and pampered by patronage, it became a centre of attraction for every one seeking favours and preferment. It gathered recruits from all directions for it was the high road to favour. POLITICAL PRINCIPLES. to Every rational being is endowed with faculties for the discrim- ination of right from wrong, good from evil. The volition of a faculty is called an idea, and the manifestation of an idea under the conduct of the understanding is a principle. Government is the science of society. Man being essentially a social being, in the adaptation of means to an end, political principles must be in- herent in his nature. A political party is an aggregation of indi- viduals holding certain principles in common, and agreeing on a united basis of action. Difference of opinion being as natural tis difference of colour or countenance, in order to agree on a com- mon platform, each member must be ready to sink or leave in abeyance some of his own views. By no other process could a large and powerful party be organized. As political principles are intuitive and common to every social being, it is in accord with nature and philosophy that each individual should be attracted towards that party whose expressed views are most in accord with his own. The first duty, therefore, of a man before allying him- self with a party, is to examine its avowed principles in order to ascertain how far they agree with his own preconceived ideas. It is by this standard we propose to examine to which of the two great political parties Irish Catholics naturally belong. We believe that our race is eminently progressive, and constitutional. We believe that our race are sincere, fervent friends of constitu- tional liberty, human progress, and religious toleration. We be- lieve that they are opposed to class legislation and class distinc- tions — that their motto is: — All should be equal in the eye of the law, as they are in the eye of the Creator. If we are true friends of progress and reform in legislation and administration — if we 60 i r V doHire tlic haJlol, that voters inny lie nMe to cxcrciHe their fran- chise hy their own coiivictioiis rather thnii the coercion of a inort- f^'age or iiitiniichitioii (»f aU'd^cr ae(;ount, if W(3 wish to HU|»|)hint an irre.spotisihle Senate I'or ati elective one, in)ine(liately under our own control; if wo think it an outrage to have to pay out of our i>ock(^ts !!?')(),()()() a year and pickin^N to our (lovernor, whih- the 're.si(h'nt ot the United States only get.s half that .sum ; if wo ■would like to see every houHciudder a voter also; if we desire a lioniestead law to protect the country iigainst pauperism ; if *ve Avish to have the; contiol of oui- taxes in our own hands; if we desir; cheap, economical government ; if we desire purity of elec- tions instead of bnhcry and corruption ; if, I say, we desire all or any of these refoiniH, as mcII as many otliers untouched, tliere is only one mode of action by which we can reasonably expect to see them |»revail : and that is hy suj)porting the party who |)rom- ises to give them ellcct. It would he foolish in the extreme to expect success by supp(»rting a ))ers(>n avowedly hostile to these measures. Take a familiar illustration. Sup[)ose a farmer wished a cci'tain concession oi' side-road (»j»ened by the couricil. If two candidates for miuiicipal honours, one favoural)le and the other op- posed io opening this road, solicited his suj)port, if he wislied hi» project to succeed, he could have no dithi'ulty in a choice ; would lie not richly deserve diseomtiturc if he voted for him wlio was oitpc'Sed to the road ? So it is in a wider, in a more extensive sense in the legislatuie — the township et)uncillor is a member of Parliament in miniature. Hence if our principles are liberal and jn-oi/irnti'tir, there is but one rational chnice for us to make — the libei-al party. They are, they must be, our friends, our natural allies. If politics, as some able writers aver, are all expediency, what then should be our course? Obviously we should seek to discover the side or party most likely to secure us the gieatest advantages. 1 have shown, if anything has been demonstrated by this paper, that foi- eighteen years we have tried the Conservatives, and lind them wanting in every ])articular. Duty and self-interest alike ])oint out the desirability o\' giving the other side a trial. We cannot possibly lose by the change, and at the very worst there is a chance of gaining. The consciousness of having appreciated the situation would in itself be a very good guarantee of fair deal- ing, apart from considerations of natural right, equality and just- ice. " Hereditary bondsmen, know ye not. Who would be free, themselves must strike the blow." So that whether we look on the question as a matter of ])rinciple or expediency, it is clearly in our common interest to support the Liberal })arty. It is likewise, I contend, in the interest of those who think only of themselves. Suppose they 51 .vnt Homo favour, do tlioy think that tlioy will bo more likely to Huceoed by Hii|i|»licatin^ on their inarrow-horu's and clinging, witli hat in hand, besides th«! drgiiidation, tho loss of Nolf- roHjMsct, than if backed by the stuMigth and intelligence of their countryiiM'n. If they think ho, wo cannot give them credit for much a.stutennHS. Thero '\n, I gnmt, one little consideiation which iTiake.H a wonderfid rlitterence, mid it iw this, that these trafHckers in our rights, thest; who would baiter away our privileges may not bo backed by the jxtwc'r and intelligence of their countrymen. Wo should never forget the ^ood old maxim, which is as applica- bhi to parti(!s aM individuals:—" If a man docoives nio once, it is liis fault; if he deceives me twice, it is mine." I am not of those who believe; tliat to bo a Conservative is to bo corrupt, reckless, and insensible to tho public; interest. On the contrary, I believe that Conservatives from their stand point and according to their convictions, are as true, aH devoted and patiiotic as any other class of the jx'ople ; and if the |)oliti(;al JVi.crardif'i'H of society are almost excdusivtily to be found in their ranks, it is more a consequence of long contimuid jjower than itdierent evil. They h(»ncstly belii've that Irish Catholics arc disloyal, unfaithful and caniKtt be trusted, and honestly acting U}) to these convictions as i'aithl'ul, patiiotic citizens they very consistently use all their intlueiu^e to prevent the calamities wh'ch they feel must inevitably ensue from giving such ])eo|)lo a share in the management of public Ifairs. They logically conclmh; that an "ounce f»f preventinii is worth a pound of cure," and that this is best eH'ecited by keej»ing them in those ])ositi()ns wliere they would be capable (»f doing a uii nnnuTn amount of har'U. In confirm itioii of this theory it will V)e ob- served that they never njake a favouriti; of any Irish (^itholic, except one who is denounced by his brethren as a traitor and a renegade, one of the judge Keogh stamp. Then, and then only, may he have a few honours cast on him ; or as the native bard beautifully and truly expresses it — for it i.s both truth and poetry — " L'liprizcd lire her sons till thoy loam to betr.iy, I'lidistintfii'shud they live if they Hhaino not their Hires ; yiiid tho tiirch that would li(fht them to dj^fiiity'rt way, Must be eau){ht from the pile where their country expires." Tills is the reason why they tried with main and might to re- sist our right to the franchise and every other privilege which we to-day enjoy. Had they acted otherwise they would not be car- rying out their honest belief of " Irish Pa| ists." Hence instead of blaming them I respect them for it. But I do blame Irish Catholics for being so foolish, aye, so worse than foolish, suicidal — criminal as to lend their assistance in putting men with these convictions, however honest, in power and helping to keep them there. It is the old story over again of the man furnishing the " stick to break his own head." 1 T 52 OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. i If 11 I Wonderful is the power of lying and boldness. " Lie boldly," says Lord Bacon in his aphorisms, " and some is sure to stick," " Lie boldly," says an Italian," and if it is believed only for one day, it will not be without effect," The great chancellor in his essay on boldness, says : "There is in human nature more of thefool than of the wi .3; and therefore those faculties by which the foolish part of men's minds is taken are most potent. Wonderful-like is the case of boldness: vhat first? boldness: what second and third ? bold- ness. And yet boldness is a child of ignorance and baseness, far inferior to other parts ; but, neveitheless, it doth fascinate, and bind hand and foot those that are either shallow in judgment or weak in courage, which are the greater part : yea, and prevaileth with wise men at weak tiines." We have a living verification of the truth of the above in the misrepresentation of the Liberal party, particularly those formidable appendages, vulgarly denom- inated " George Brown " and the " Globe," and the falsehoods are so oft repeated that they cease to be, examined, and are, to a great extent, accepted as gospel truths. I think tliat I can lay claim to being as sensitive as most men on all questions affecting the honour, the reputation and the rights of Irishmen. j.n fact, one of the steraotyped charges against me is, that J am tco extrevie, too sensitive on Irish questions. For the last fifteen or sixteen years I have been a pretty constant reader, not only of the Globe, but of the Leader and Colonist, (while it lived) of Toronto ; of the Gazette and Advertiser of Montreal ; and an occasional reader of the Spectator of Hamilton, the Prototype of London, and Chronicle of Quebec, as well as of the reform press of these placets. While I admit and regret that during this time many things have appeared in the Globe, which, to say the least, were indiscreet, and had much better been left unsaid — as who amongst us has not said things that he would wish unsaid — I do most emphatically assert that during this same period for the one passage in the Globe at which an Irish Catholic could justly take umbrage, a dozen, a score, aye, and fifty have appeared in each of the above papers ; and if quoting such passages was relevant or material to my subject, I could fill a nice little volume with them. But I would not pollute these pages with the foul garbage. I would not exhume fi ^m i' .-> black grave the noisome carcase to cater to the vitiated tastes and dainty palates of our worst enemies. Nor can I be persuaded that those who deal with such filthy trash are the best friends of our people. Lord Bacon says : — " That which is pas^ is gone and irrecoverable, and wise men have enough to do with things present and to come." Nor should it be lost sight of that during all this time the Globe was under no obligation to Irish Catholics, while the party represented by i 53 the other papers was receiving their active support. Undue importance is too often attached to newspaper articles. A newspaper known to speak the sentiments of a Government ia watched and read with interest, because it is the mouth-piece of the administration. For example, suppose the Globe now pro- pounded a new land or timber policy for Ontario, it would at once be assumed that it was speaking on behalf of the Govern- ment, and therefore importance attached to it, which otherwise would be puerile. But no such weight or importance can or should be attached to the sayings of an independent paper, who may simply be airing the views of its editor ; and these often very shallow and worthless. Suppose that I admit for argument sake, what as a fact I most distinctly deny, that Mr. Brown and the Globe were in the past what they are represented to be by his worst enemies, what would that prove against the Reform party ? I answer unhesitat- ingly nothing — absolutely nothing. Surely a party, numbering its followers by hundreds of thousands, is not going to be judged by the acts of one man or by the writings in one newspaper. In physics what would be thought of a philosopher who sought to es- tablish a general law of nature fi'om one phenomenon or from one set of phenomena. Why his theorizing would be scouted as absurd and dangerous speculations, even though, like Kepler, his genius unaided could for an instant penetrate the vast abyss that divides finite knowledge from infinity. Such laws are founded on care- fully recorded series of obscivations under every variety of cir- cumstances and extending over considerable periods of time ; and when promulgated as great natural truths they are subjected to the most severe, rigid and critical analysis by all the world of science : every credential is closely inspected before being admitted to the temple of truth. Take ti.e astronomer in the simplest of his operations — the finding of his latitude. Though possessed of the most perfect instruments that .scientific skill can bring to his aid, will he determine it by a single observation ? Far from it. Day after day he will make a series of observations, take a mean of each day's; and by a mean oi' all Jiis means he fixes his posi- tion. In judging a party we must take ground exactly similar to the philosopher, we must not draw conclusions from single or isolated facts. We must try it by the views of all its leading men, by the authorized exposition of its doctrines by the princi- ples it inculcates and bv the whole press which circulates them. We must not s])ecially sei.^,e on yiei'iods in its history of exaspera-r tion and disturbance. Who would think his character fairly portrayed by a delineator who seized on his moments of weak- ness from ill-!mmour or excitement ? We must take a compre- hensive view, gather together all its acts, and judge it intelligently and critically by the sum total of these acts. Would it be ju.st or ii. ' 54 fair of me if in this paper I condemned the Conservative party for thj acts of one of its members or newspapers. I might, for ex- ample, say tliat they were steadily supported by the great grand and all the little grands of the Orange institution, and that such testimony was sufficient and conclusive that Irish Catholics should have nothing to do with them. I have not doiiC so, it would be neither just nor honourable. I have curefuUy collated and ex- amined their acts extending over a period of nearly twenty years ; and by these acts, and these only, have I judged them. Do like- wise, act similarly by the Liberal party , and I have no fear of the result. If they do not come forth from the ordeal jiure and of full weight, like tine gold tried in the fire, then condemn them and I will h*^artily join in the condemnation. I might appeal to facts if noces-^ary to strengtlien n)y argument, to show that Mr. Brown and the Globe do not constitute the Reform party. During the first session of 1863, the Globe was continually fault-finding with the Liberal Government, Did the Government lose one vote by the Globes grumblings ? Not one, and more singular still, Mr. Brown towards the end of the session was returned to Parliament, and when there did exactly what the Globe had been all along censuring. t t I CHANGE OF BASE. Has any of you ever asked himself how it occurred that on one particular night the Irish Catholics of Canada went to bed good and staunch liberals, and on waking the next morning found themselves fully-fledged Tories. This anomaly needs explanation. In 1854 the party since known as of bons principes coalesced with the Tories of Upper Canada — their former foe. The compact was concise, simple, expressive and intelligible. " The party of the first part covenants, bargains and agrees with the party of the second part, that if the said party of the second part will give and allow the said party of the first part their own way in the management of all matters affecting that piece, parcel or tract of land known as Lower Canada, they, the said party of the first } wiy will let, allow and consent the said party of the second part to have their own way and fling in the managementof Upper Cana- da with all the appurtenances thereunto belonging." In a subse- quent clause there was a pi-oviso that the Protestants of Lower Canada were not included in the transfer. But no saving clause for the Irish Catholics of U[)per Canada. They were handed over to the tender mercy of Orangeism. A difficulty of getting the peo- ple to ratify so shameful an abandonment of principles was fore- seen, and must be provided for. A happy expedient was hit upon. European society had just been recovering from the shocks of re- volution, anarchy and infidelity. The temporal patrimony of the f i 55 Church throughout Christendom was declared to be in danger. The eyes of the spoliator were said to be upon it. Mazzini, Gav- azzi and kindred spirits stalked abroad. / II these things made the moment opportune — a fortuitous combination of cu-cum- .stances for the success of the plot. The advanced liberals of Lower Canada were stigmatized as socialists, revolutionists and the enemies of God and man. Their youthful ardour was construed into treason, their juvenile declamations into harbingers of anar- chy. The blood of 89 and the memories of 93 were invoked. The unsuspecting bishops, in their innocence of political knpvery, became alarmed, and were inveigled into the trap so ingeniously set for them. They were made believe that if tlie Liberal party suc- ceeded to power their first acts would be the spoliation of their religious institutions after the continental fashicm ; and that the only way to prevent that dire calamity was to throw their whole support and influence to them and their new-found allies from Upper Canada. Lnpressed with the seeming danger the hierarchy of Lower Canada appealed to those of their brethren and fellow- countrymen of Upper Canada to make common cause with them against the common enemy of the Church, and to rally the " faith- ful L'ish" — her trusty defenders — under their banner. Thus were we led captive at the chariot wheels of Sir George Cartier, thus were we wheedled by the false cry of the " Church in danger" into tl J support of our hereditary and implacable foe. The subsequent agitation of the school question still further served to alienate us from our natural allies and true friends. The " Ciiurch in danorer" ■cry IS now having a second resurrection, and the effrontery of the resurrectionists eclipses Lord Bacon's ideas of lies and boldness. Whatever plausibility might formerly begiv n to such cries, Con- federation has placed that jurisdiction entire? v and excln>ively in the hands of Lower Canadians them ves, and no danger can €ver reach their religious institutions - it be throucjh the re- creancy of Lower Canadians themselves. POLITICAL INGRATITUDE. Reader, have you ever pondered on our conduct? have you ever reflected on our ingratitude? We turned our back- ii our principles, we abandoned without cause those, side by si . .- with whom we fought and struggled for civil and religious liberty, and conquered; and when in possession of the citadel, we turn 1 round and handed the key to the enemy. Never was treac' y baser, and now, forsooth, we turn up our lips because some uhe people whom we thus betrayed show some symptoms of distrust. I have often heard brainless prattlers exclaim with affected indigna- tion : " Grits are too bigoted to support any Irish Catholic." Admitting for argument's sake their correctness, which I entirely ■ '■- (? '■■'' J ii ' ! t^ 66 deny as facts, what claims have they to " Grit " support. The proofs of its falsehoods are abundant and at every one's hand. In- deed, considering all the circumstances, the conduct of the Reform party towards Irish Catholics has been more than generous, far more than could reasonably be expected at their hands, measured by the ordinary standard of human aftairs. MR. BLAKE. If there ever was a time when duty and self-interest, if not self-preservation, point to the banner of the Liberal party as the rallying point for Irish Catholics, that time is the present, when its chief standard-bearer is one of our own race — one of our own blood — one of our own kith and kin ; one too, who shall yet oc- cupy a place beside Burke and Sheridan, Grattan and O'Connell, Shiel and O'Brien. Those who basely insinuate that because of his religion he is not worthy of the confidence of Irish Catholics, know they are vilely slandering our people. Was not Wolfe Tone a Protestant ? was not Robert Emmett a Protestant ? was not Lord Edward a Protestant ? was not Smith O'Brien a Protestant ? Is not John Mitchell a Protestant ? are not Butt and Martin Pro- testants ? What names so dear, what memories so revered, what tombs so hallowed, what shrines so sanctified as are these to Irish- men ? Mr. Blake worships at the same shrine of liberal ideas as they did. He is actuatetl by the same love of justice, the same horror of oppression, which characterized thei.:.. Hap|)ily for us, we have fallen on better times, we are reaping the fruits of their martyrdom. Had Edward Blake lived in those dark days, an eye witness of, a sharer in, the tyrannies for which they ever will have an unenviable notoriety, could he control his indigna- tion or would he be carried away by the generous impulses of his nature to be engulfed in the vortex which swallowed so many brave men and true, are matters of speculation on which we need not dwell. That he is ready to do his duty by the present, is sufficient for us. It may well be our pride and boast to be led by so worthy a leader. ;li OUR POWER. Power in mechanics is the product of the weight or quantity of matter in a mass into its volume. Power in politics is somewhat analogous, for it is the product of numbers into the centripetal or adhesive foice. Do we appreciate our power ? do we sufficiently consider the influence we might wield in public affairs ? we num- ber about a half-million of souls, scattered all over the country from Halifax io Sarnia. It is this, which at firs* siiiht mitrht seem a source of weakness, is our greatest strengfcli. The elect- 67 elect- oral college of the whole Dominion consists of about 400,000, of whom we form about an eighth, scattered, as already remarked, in various proportions throughout all the constituencies. It is with- in the limits of safety to assume that we can determine in one- half of the whole Dominion, or 100 constituencies, who shall be their representfitives, and therefore the complexion and conatitu- tion of the Government, for we hold the balance of power between rival and contending parties. This should be a most favourable position to occupy. Let us then learn to employ it judiciously, let us learn to wield it advantageously, and we shall be courted and sought after, instead of being despised as in the past. We have one of the elements of success (numbers), let us emulate with one another to cultivate the ol,her. We are now like a vast hy- draulic power, going to waste for want of its application to use- ful purposes. We are the arbiters of our own destiny. This is patent to the plainest understanding. If this is so, am I not jus- tified in attributing our present lamentable position to our own apathy or mismanagement — to our own divisions and disregard of the common interest. But if in one constituency or one province our people support one political party, and in another a dilierent one, we neutralize our own strength, we thereby constitute in the political s})here a balanced force, which may be entirely removed or overlooked with- out affecting the statical equilibrium of the whole structure. There- fore to have our power felt and effectual for good, it must be thrown into one scale. I have endeavoured to show that this scale is the Libe- ral one. If you agree with me, and I am at a loss to know how you can rationally reject my conclusions : then to carry these out successfully there is but one course to pursue — to support with your vote and inffuence the avowed candidates of the Liberal party. To do this you nmst cast aside all considerations of personal likes and dislikes, j'ou must dismiss questions of personal favours and obligations, for as I have previously said, if you desire your prin- ciples to succeed, it is not done by supporting those who are op- posed to them. You should interrogate every cand'-late. His answer should be plain, intelligible, conclusive and satisfactoiy on the main question, 'luhetlier he tulll, if elected, support the Gov- ernment or the Opposition. Let there be no evasion or room for equivocation on this point, and if he is not to your entire satisfac- tion and beyond reasonable doubt with the LiVjeral party, it is your duty to reject, however much you may personally respect, him. For we should always bear in mind that it is not for the individual we vote but for the party of which he is a member. It is the veriest nonsense to say that you do net wish to see Orange- ism in power if you support its supporters. Let this be your tirst question, because it is the most vital, the most important to the amelioration of your position, to the elevation of your class. I 58 h say here, and I take my stand on that declaration, that it is more to the advantnge and interest of Irish Catholics as a class to sup- port a ProteMdiit Liberal than a Cdtliolic who supports the Con- servative Government. There is none less worthy of your sup- port than he who claims it solely on religious grounds. He should also have other passports to your favour. He should have education, he should have ability, in a word, he should have a re- cord to point to. Better, a thousand times better, to be unrepre- sented, than viisrcpresev fed. • In taking this ground I may observe that I am following theex- amj)le set by the venerable Bishop of Kingston, at the last Ontario election, when, as I have been credibly informed, he enunciated tlie liberal policy of recommending his clergy, and through them their Hocks, to vote for a Frotedunt Conserv(dive in East Peter- borough in preference to an Irish Catholic Libera/. Mr. O'Dono- hoe, whose private character is unimpeachable, and who, in my humble o[)inion, is one of the most devoted and m«)st disinterested, one of the best, j)urest and truest of Irish Catholics in this Domin- ion, and to whose character the poet's description of Grattan is justly applicable — " Ever glorious Orattan I the best of the good, So simple in heart, so sublime in the rest ! With all that Demosthenes wanted endued, And his rival or vietor in all he possessed. " Ere Tally arose in the zenith of Rome, Though unequall'd, preceded, i,he task was begun— But GraMan s|)rung up like a gud from the tomb Of age.' , the first, last, the saviour, the one ! " With the skill of an Ory)heus to soffen the brute ; With tl e fire of Prometheus to kindle mankind ; Even Tyranny, listening, sate melted or nuite, And (Jorrupiion shrunk scorch'd from the glance of his mind." BVKO!*. I say that Mr. O'Donohoe could only be opposed by that re- vered prelate on account of his political principles. For my own part I hail with pleasure this course — that every one of the bishops will support, on public grounds, that political party to whose keeping the public interests are, in his opinion, best entrusted, and I sin- cerely hope that the hierarchy will not object to the Catholic laity exercising a similar discretion, that an Irish Catholic Liberal will support a Liberal, whether he be a Catholic or Protestant, and that there shall no longer be questions of religion mixed up with politics. I have no fear but the Liberal party will give Irish Catholics a fair representation in their ranks. 1 have it from Mr. O'Dono- hoe's own lips that there was not a Protestant Liberal in East Peterborough voted against him, notwithstandi'ig the industrious circulation of " Fenian " conspiracies and other infamous false- hoods, and that he lost his election for want of time to enable him to contradict false statements circulated amongst his co-religionists 69 rith prejudicial to his character. We have Mr. Dawson triumphantly elected by the reformers of Kent, and Mr. BVaser by the reftrmers of South Grenville. How much more may we expect when we evince a desire to return to our old allegiance, when we show sym})toms of an earnest desire to come back to the ranks which in our folly we left. There shall be rejoicing in the Liberal camp when, like the prodigal, we return home. There are, I doubt not, many members supporting the Conser- vative Goveinmeut, who are individually Liberal in sentiment, free from bigotrj, and who would o.stracise no man because of the accidents of race or creed. This cla,ss of men support the Govern- ment for either or all of the following reasons: — Ist. That the whippers in of the party flatter their vanity and allay their suspic- picions by a cunningly-devised system of laudation and lip liber- ality ; 2nd. They are too unsuspecting to doubt and too lazy to examine ; and 3rd. They consider the Government so strong that all attempts at their overthrow would be futile, and for the sake of small favours for their constituents, they continue to give it support. We often hear those slii)8hod orators, who act the whi})s of the party, exclaim that the utmost harmony prevails between all " clawses," and sectaries in this country ; and take credit to their party for allaying the demon of discord. Yes, that harmony which subsists between a master and his slaves— the latter are allowed to live and toil so long as they are humble and obedient, and ready to do the master's behests. Some will say what is the use of opposing a certain candidate, he will, nevertheless, be elected ; and without effecting any tangi- ble bencitit we are converting a friend into an enemy. This is one of the misfortunes of open voting, one of the many strong arguments in favour of the ballot in preventing the disruption of social relations and friendlv intercourse between those who differ on public questions. If the franchise is to be exercised from such considerations, it would be better for the individual and the public that such was disfranci)ised. Moreover, the man who in his private relations to another would be influenced by such considerations is wholly unfit to be a representative of the people. The elector in duty, in honour and in patriotism must banish all such considera- tions from his mind, and use this solemn trust in strict accordance with his own convictions. I can do no better here than quote a few extracts, clipped from the Irish Sentinel, from a pastoral of John, the venerable and patriotic Archbishop of Tuam, so often and justly styled " the Lion of the fold of Judah," to his clergy. The Archbishop says : " We are again on the eve of one of those periods so disastrous to the interests of morality and religion that recur occasionally in Jreland. During elections the mind of many of the faithful are 60 I J: i '■•i , I SO often loosed from the ordinary restraints of duty, that it is un- fortunately looked upon as a time when bribery, perjury, drunk- enness and every species of corruption are permitted to supplant the ordinary virtues of the people. It is our duty to endeavour to check those mighty evils, filled with a just apprehension of the threat of the prophet, that if the faithful should sin lor want of seasonable warning, the Judge of the living and the dead ' shall demand their blood at our hands.' " I am well aware that an apologj' is sought for those transgres- sions in the strong temi»taiions held out by men who, as they af- fect a zeal for the morality of the people, should never hold out any inducements to sin. The dread of those who might persecute the freeholders for a faithful discharge of their duty ought to be subdued by the words of the Redeemer, telling us not to fear those who can kill the body, but rather to fear Him who can destroy both body and soul in hell. " After filling their souls with this salutary fear which the Gospel inspires, you will not fail to impress upon the people that they risk the loss of their immortal souls by the crimes of perjury and bribery to which I have alluded. Remind them of the inspired admonition, 'Speak the truth every one to his neighbuur: judge truth and judgment, love not false oaths, for these are the things I hate, saith the Lord.' Nay assure thern in the words of the same ])roplint, that ' The curse of the Lord shall come to the house of the thief, and to the house of him who sweareth falsely His name.' Let them not, therefore, give a vote, unless their conscience assures them that they have a real freehold to the en- joyment of which they have already sworn. " As for bribery, that foul crime that has done so much to cor- rupt the purity of elections, by debauching the minds of the peo- ple, your denunciations of so enormous a sin must be cogent in pro})ortion to its atrocity. The freehold is not a property to he set up for sale. It is held in trust for the benefit of the people^ and no man can have a right to traffic upon that which is not solely his own, and by such a vile bargain to inflict injury upon the community. There can be no compromise of this truth; let, therefore, the people be ])ersuaded that whoever receives a bribe directly or indirectly for his vote is to be excluded from the bene- fits of the sacraments until he makes restitution of the money, which might be called the price of happiness of the poor, the widow and orphan. No matter through what medium the bribe may be received, no matter under what specious contracts the traffic may be disguised, the Catholic Church detests all such pre- varications and evasions ; and therefore the saying of St. Augus- tine is applicable to all such cases ; ' Until restitution is made, the sin is not forgiven.' Let those who receive a bribe as the price of their country's happiness, entertain no hope of absolution until 61 they atone for their crime by restitution of ill-gotten treasures. When the film with which bribery covers the eyes of the electors is once removed, they will more easily perceive the straight path which duty points out of giving their suHrage to those who shall best promote the interests of religion and the happiness of their country ; for the Scripture assures us that ' presents and gifts blind the eyes of judges, and make them dumb in the mouth, so that they cannot correct.' When, therefore, that obstruction is once removed, it will be an easy task to convince the freeholders of their duty. In short, when once the hope of bribery on the one hand and the fear of unchristian oppression on the other are taken away, the people will come to the hustings as reasonable, intelligent and free agents ought to come, with a consciousness that they are not the serfs of any man, but the trustees of religion and nationality, and that they owe no account, but to God alone, for the use they make of the elective franchise." ONTARIO. t) cor- peo- nt in to he eofUy is not upon ; let, bribe bene- loney, n-, the bribe Its the h pre- lugus- ie, the price until In view of all the circumstances, the Catholics of Ontario have but one rational choice. "There are in round numbers about 180,000 electors in this province, of these 25,000 are Catholics. Of the remaining 155,000 Protestant electors, 90,000 belong to the Liberal party, and the balance of 65,000 are composed of Conservatives and camp followers. No one conversant with the political history of this province for the l^vst tifteen years can affirm that I have exaggerated the strength of the Liberal party, nay, I believe it is under-estimated. For many parlia- ments preceding Confederation the reformers though in opposition with all its disadvantages, carried a majority of the con.stituencies, and in 1803 when in power they carried over two to one; and if they lost ground in the general election of 1807, it was owing to the coalition — the treachery of a i^vf leading men. During these times probably four-fifths of the Catholics were arrayed against them. The result of last year's election corroborates this view. Parties have stood thus : Liberals— Protestant, 90,000 Catholics, 5,000 95,000 Tories — Protestant, 65,000 " Catholics, 20,000 85,000 Majority for Liberals 10,000 We see then that the reform party have an undisputed majority in Upper Canada, and are destined to rule in that province, at least. Entirely apart from sentiment, is it not our interest to join in strengthening that party, and thereby establish our claim to a h i. 62 fair share in the management of jiuhlic aflairs in that section of the Dominion. Reverse the disposition of the Catholic vote, and then note the difference in onr favour. Parties would then stand. Liberals— Protestants, <)(),()()() Catholics iO.OOO 110,000 Tories— Protestants, 05,000 Catliolics, 5,000 70,000 Mnjority for Liberals 40,000 By this means our cUiims to a fair distribution would be in- creased fourfold. I doubt not but tliis would secure sixty out of the eighty -eiglit seats to the Rofoini Jiarty, out of wliich the Cath- olics coidd fairly claim ton. Would not this be a new and happy })hase in our colonial histoiy. Yet it is (juite feasible, and of easy realization if we do our duty. For our support of five thousand we have received in return a Minister of the (^rown and two or three members of parliament, if we (juadru})le that su])port it is a question of Him))le proportion to calculate our gain by secuiing us ten niembcrs. This projtortion is not unfair, for the most san- guine claimed only 42 out of 82 members for the Liberal party. At last election our support was one to nineteen, so that we fared wonderfully well. 'J\) give ethct to this object T would respectfully suggest to the Chairman and Executive Committee of the Cathoiie League — the oidy rej)resentative organization of the Catholic laity of Ontario, — to call by circular or otherwise a meeting of leading Catholics from the various sections of the ])rovinc(i, to deliberate on thisim- j)ortant subject, to select, from amongst them, gentlemen qualified tu be put forward as candidates and to appoint a committee to confer with a like number of the leaders of the Reform })arty for the purpose of giving effect to this ])roposition, and determining the constituencies where Catholic candidates may be run. CONCH'SION. In bringing to a conclusion this trespass on your time, this^ trial on your ])atience, ])ermit me to assure you that I have been actuated but by one motive — the public good in general, and your good in particular. I shall now consign the matter to your arbi- trament ; I shall shift the responsibility to your own shoulders, and only add that if this paper shall, even in a remote degree, be instrumental in elevating our political status or ameliorating the condition of our people in this country, it will have answered a useful purpose, and I shall feel amply repaid for the time and la- bour its production has cost me, njy greatest regret being my in- competency to do the subject that justice, which should be expect- i f G3 ed from an exponent of the views of so numerous a elnsa of the peopUi. I hIijiII finish by recalling to your memory the fable of the "Swallow and other birds." "A swallow observing a farmer employed in sowing" hemp, called tlie little birds together, infornuul them what ho was about,, telling tluun that hemp was tho material from whicli tlu; nets so fatal to the feathered tribe were made, and advised them t<» join unanimously in picking it up before the seeds had taken too deep root. The birds heard his warning, but paid no atttuition to hia advice, bi a short time the hemj) appeared above ground. The friendly swallow again addressed himself to the little birds, and told them it wiusnotyet too late, if they immediately set about the work. But they still neglecting his advice, he forsook their society, reppirod for safety to towns and cities, and there built his haV)itation and kept his residence. One day as he was skim- ming along the street, he saw a number of the.se v(!ry birds im- prisoned in a cage on the shoulders of a bird-catcher. ' Unhappy wretches,' said he, 'you now sufl'er the punishment of your former neglect. Had }()U taken my advice and j)icked up the hemp seeds, you would now be free to cleave on freedom's wing your native air instead of prisoners in that cage. But tlioxe lulio, fuiv- iiKj no fort sight of their oiva, denpise the icJio/rsome admonitions at their friendn, deserve the mischiefs which tJieir neglect or their obstlivict/ brings upon their heads." Fellow-countrymen, I ha'/e the honor to subscribe myself Your sincere, devoted, and faithful servant, J. L. P. O'HANLY. Ottawa, 1st June, 1872. this^ 64 APPENDIX. Tho late D'Arry MoQoo'h opinion of the Toronto Freeman, and its oditor, Mr. J. G. Moylan. "THE TORONTO FREEMAN." A CIRCULAR LKTTER FROM MR. M'(1EK, M. P. P. " My Dkar Sir : — As I was InHtrumontal in enlisting tho sup- port of .several friends in your neiglihourhood for the Toronto Freeman, I take this niean.s of informing yon of facts which have lately transpired, in reference to that new.spaper, and which, in the interests of public justice, you are at liberty to comniunicato to any one you plea.se, on my authority. " When th«! types and subKcrij)tion list of the Catholic Citizen were purcha.sed, in 1858, it was in order to suppress that mo.st objectionable ]>«pcr, which had used the clonk of religion for all the conjmoncst purj)o.ses of partizan warfare. The funds by which this purchase wjih made were, in part, contributed by some per- sonal friends of nnne, and the prospectus of the new paper, the Freeman, was drafted by a Committee, of which I was one. When question arose as to the Editor, T suggested the name of Mr. J. G. Moylan, Teacher, of Guelph, and at my suggestion he was sent for. When the arrangements for transferring the bonus to the new Editor and Publisher were far enough advanced for action, it was proposed to bind the Editor under some penalty, to adhere faith- fully to the non-partizan clause, and other conditions of the Pros- pectus ; but I resi.sted any such stipulation being imposed, because I contended that with the example of the late Citizen before his eyes, our best guarantee for the new Editor's independence would be found in his own interest. " At two subsequent periods, I again interposed, as you know, to obtain aid for the journal, without which I was assured it could not possibly go on ; once when Mr. Mallon, the original partner of Mr. Moylan, was bought out, and his share transferred to the latter gentleman, and again under the threatened criminal prosecution of the Orange Grand Master, Mr. Hillyard Cameron. " I refer to these facts, simply and solely to show that I had some right to ask from the Freeman the insertion of any letter of rea- sonable length, written over my own signature, and forever}' sen- tence of which I, and not the Editor, would be necessarily responsible. During the past two months, once before and once since the gene- ral election, I made such a request. In the former case, my letter to Mr. Macarow, of Kingston, was withheld three weeks under one pretext or another, and more recently, a temperate and measured 0.5 diHclaiiiior of any participatioji in t]u* rmwut oU\cX'un\()*'r\n<^ taetioi of tho FrnenidJi was, aftc-r a f()rtMij,'lit's dt'tciition, nstiirnotl to mo, with a note, as Mtan(MH)t' tlio coinnMinicritioii, tlms siipprcsscd, is all that f will troiildo you with, in '!< (if flu' Toronto Fr^'nium" and would have filhid a cohunn imd a half, peihapM, of that Journal. It contained just .six paragraphs. The /irs/ hrietly alluded to my well known puhlio interest in the Fireman ; the nfcoml referred to the policy of ccn- ciHatioti towards the refonu party of which I had heen an advo- cate in the [fouso of AsscMnhlv, and tin? Fi'('('ni(in,onv. of the orj^ans in the Pre.ss ; th(^ t/iird deprivated in mild hut explicit laiij^uago the sudden desertion of that |)olicy, without sufUcient puhlic (latiso n/iown, (»n tlu! innneiliate eve of the latt^ j^eneral election ; the fonrtli. nx\d fif/h illustrate(| the folly and dan^(;r of fickleness and diHre<^aiy personal gratitude to those (V)nununities of our friiMids such m Lanark, Victoria, Haldiniand and Perth, which honourahly adher- ed to the conciliation policy of the last four years, and to promi- nent individuals who had preserved the same consistent course. This wius the whole sum aiidsul)stan(M3 of the ct>mm>inication which Mr. Moylan refused to ju^init me to puldish over my own name, through the medium of those types of which, but for my friends and myself, he never wo»dd have heen the master. " The personal wrong, howf^ver, is hut a small jmrt of the far greater pul)lic wrong done by the FreeniatiH perversion. That paper was not a private chattel, of which the gentleman in charge could say : " I have a right to do as I like with my own." It was foumled and sustained chiefly hy the contributions of Catholic electors in Upj)er and Lower Canada. It had a representative character and a rej)reseiitative responsibility. The Toronto ( 'on- ference, immediately preceding the Banquet of the2l)th of Septem- ber, 1859, composed of hxvally influential men, Reeves, Councillors, Aldermen, Presidents of Societies, and Chairmen of numerous Meetings, had given it that character, in a series of resolutions', explicit and unenjuivocal. That Conference was held more than twelve months after the Brown- Dorion crisis of July, 18.')S, and no new facts have since been publicly elicited, so far as I know, which would justify a total abandonment of the understanding then , entered into — an uiidcr-itanding cordially accepted by the Editor (to u.se his own words at the subsequent Bancpiet), " for weal and for woe," — words which for more than a year afterwards, up to the very day of the late general election — were never once at- tempted to be explained away, still less withdrawn or retracted, or denied, as they now are. " If there (tre good and sufflcient /);y6/ic nvij^ons for such a sum- 66 h ^ ■ t :t 'i I • I I merHault being performed, they have not been stated in the Freeman's apology, s(» far. The pretext tliat it was to })unish Mr. Brown,[)erson- ally, is inconsistent with th^' facts whi(;h liave come to light. The offences of Mr. Brown were before the Editor's eyes in 1858 and 1859, as fully jus in 1801, but then he contended for giving him, in tlie spirit of conciliation, "a fair trial." It could not be "to punish Mr Bn, n, ' tlult Dr. Connor, one of the early benefactor., of the paper, was malignantly attacked ; it need not be to punish Mr. Bro^vn, that the liberal and upright Adam Wilson was opjios- ed ; it need not be to punish Mr. Brown, that the "come weal, come M'oe," Mr. Moylan, of 185!), presented himself side by 3ide with Mr. Allen, the Jaihn", to glorify the alliance of "Orange and Green," from the balcony of the veteran head of the family ' jm- pact, Chief Justice Robinson. Whatever motives have led to thi.s perversion of the })aper from the purposes to which its Prospectus, and the resolutions of September, 1859, bound it in honour to ad- here, tliose motives, so far, are of a private character, and have never been, aS; [)erha|)s, they cannot afford ro be, made public. "The guilt of the Freeman then, is this : that publicly its con- ductor gave his adhesion to a Lne of policy, from its inception to the very eve of a general election, which line of policy he sudden- ly abandoned, without any sufficient public justification for so do- ing. That in order to niislea'1 others to take the same course he returned to old outworn controversies dating so far back as 1851, controversies which had been, in our own interest, decreed to be closed forever, when the policy of conciliation was inaugurated, on the suf)pression of the Catholic Citizen. That being uound to in- dependence as betvveen Canadian partizans, his attacks, [mblic and personal, ware all delivered on one side of politics, and i)is advo- cacy a.U on the other side. That he used, in this way, the author rity, and abused the confidence placed in him by many zealous friends and supporters, who, he right veil knew, utterly disap- proved of his making a Mirror or 2\ue Witness of himself and the paper. That, moreover, he concealed his proposed change io so far advanced an hour, that these consistent friends and sup- porters were unable to counteract the mischief done by his deser- tion of his indepeiident post, until the contest was past, and the mischief in some instances beyond repair, for the present ; in other words, the guilt of ingratitude, deception, and insincerity, are clearly fastened by his own acts upon this gentleman, whom you ana 1, and many others, have for the past three years exerted every effort to sustain in his position, so abused, and so dishonoured. His new friends may, perhaps, do more for him that way than his old ones, but they cannot do it more freely, or with better hearts. " These are the facts, my dear sir, which in the interests of public justice, I feel bound to communicate to you, in the present circular. I cannot conclude without the expression of a hope that we shall I 07 have, ere long, u, jjress governed by higher nioti'eH than have gwjiyed our former friend from his allegiance to his principles and his su])port>rs. As to him, all that needs to be said, is told in the proverb : • If a man deceives me once, it is his f}..ilt; if /u'/<;/^ it 18 my own.' " ! have the honom- to subscribe myself, Yours very tr\dy, THOS. D'AROY M'GKK. " Montreal, Aug. oth, ISOl. " *^* 1 may be obliged, from time to time, to send circulars to you on this and similar subjects, in whidi you will be good enough to exin.se the printed form adopted." w^