IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 4rj S' ^ //,.. ^^ 1.0 I.I U|28 |25 m^^ HIIIHH "■■ ■- 12.2 us 1^ 2.0 1.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 ^ 6" _ ► V] <^ '/ /A Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY 14580 (716) 872-4503 ^ ^U ^T7BrjSHED BY J. BELDEN AND CO. V.in WtBkte fc Wiley, PrlnMri. / n mSTHCT or KBW-VOBIE, l«. St IT RBBIBM^RBD, that oa tlie twentr-MTenth day of NoTember, in the fortieth year of the Independence of thf United states of Amerieaf J. Belden h Co> of the laid diitriot, hare depoated in thia ofllee the title of a bode, tlw right whereof they claim at proprieton, in the words following, to wit ; **Letter8on the late War betwMintho United States and Great BriUint toge> ther with other Bfiscellaneous Writings, on the same Subject. By William Cob* bett. Esq," In conformity to the act oS Congress of the United States, entitled, *' A^ a«t for the encoowgemeiit of kwn^ng^ by iMiriflg the eopi^^f maps* ehavti^ and books to the authors and imprietors of such copte«, during the times therein mentioned ;" •nd also to an act, entitled, « An act, nnpplementary to an act, entitle^ an act for the encouragement of learning, by secnrn'*- the copies of maps, charts, and books to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned, and extending the benefits thereof to the art* of designing, engratiog, and etching liisto« rical «n4 other print!." THERON RUDD, Clerk of the Southern l^triet geverelj, tmarting, writhing, as we are, under the effects of the wat with France, and considering how easily this war might, in 179:J, have been avoided without either danger or dishonour to England ; thus feeling, and thus reflecting, it is natural for IIS, when threatened with a new war, to inquire, betimes, what •re the grounds of such war ; whether it would he just ; if just, whether it would be necessary ; and, be the cause what it may, whether the consequences are likely to be good or evil. If, sir, the counsels of Mr. Fox had been listened to, in the years 1792 and 1793, the state of England, of Europe, and of the world, would have been very different indeed from what it now is. A war against opinions and principles would not have been waged ; England, instead of becoming a party in that fatal and disgraceful war, would have been a mediatress be- tween the conflicting parties, if, indeed, she had not wholly Erevented the conflict. So many governments would not have een overthrown ; such rivers of human blood would not have been shed ; reformation might and would have been produced^ because the state of things, and the temper of men's minds, de* manded it; but no where need there have been destruction ; all the states of Europe might have remained on their old foundations, and the Bourbons might at this day have been upon the thrones of France and Spain. This kingdom, too, mighi; and must have shared in the reformation ; but such reformation would have made no inroads upon rank or property ; and the nation would have avoided all those measures of coercion, all tiiose before-unheard-of laws td which tits contest gave rise } 2 10 Letters of William Cobbelt, Esq. and thoie enormous expenses, which, first producing debt anci tenfold ta&ation, led by degrees to that pauperism aotl paper money J which now form the two great and hideous features ia the state of our internal aftairs, and which no man who realiy loves the country can contemplate without (he most serious apprehensions. Such being the consequences of that war, or, rather a part of these Consequences, the far greater proportion of them being, in all probability, yet to come, it behooves those who have. power to act to consider well before they launch the country into a new war ; and it is the right of every man to express, in the way which he may think most likely to be efficient, hitr opinions upon the subject. This right I am now about to exer- cise, and if I have chosen, as the vehicle, an address to your Royal Highness, it is because that respect, which inclination as well as duty dictate upon such an occasion, will not fail to make me dismiss from my mind all partiality and prejudice, and to offer nothing unsupported by fair reasoning and undeniable facts. As to the grounds of the present dispute with the American States, they are some of them of very long standing. The conduct of this government relative to the war against those States was extremely unwise ; but its conduct since the war is, I am convinced, unparalleled in the annals of diplomatic fol- ly. The moment that war was at an end, the people of the two countries, attached to each other by all the ties which im- perious nature has provided, were ready to rush into a mutual embrace, and like children of the same common parent, whose harmony bad been disturbed by a transient quarrel, to become even more affectionate towards each other than they had been before. Not so the governments. With them ambition and resentment had something to say. But, the American Govern- ment being, from the nature of its constitution, a thing of such transient possession, it would have been impossible for any set of men long to remain in power if they had been discovered to entertain a vindictive disposition towards England ; that is to say, if the government of England had discovered no such dis- position towards America. Unhappily such a disposition was but too plainly seen Jn the whole of the conduct of our govern- ment ; and hence we have witnessed, from the end of the Ame- rican war to this day, a dispute, and an angry dispute too upon some ground or other, cons^tantly existing and in agitation be- tween the two countries, to the great injury of them both, to the great injury of the cause of freedom, and to the great ad- vantage of France as a nation, and to the cause of despotic sway all over the world. The war was at an end, but the quarrel seemed only to have begun : a seven ye^rs war, and an already eight-and-twenty years of quarrel i Letters of William Cohbett, Esq* W It was full ten years before we condescended to send a MU nisti^r to reside in America, and when we did it, the object Beeiiied to be only to recall, or to render more active, ancient animosities. A miserable dispute about old claims for detits due to English subjects on one side, and about negroes carried off at the peace on the other aide, clouded and made gloomy the dawn of this new diplomatic intercourse. This dispute was kept alive until new claims for vessels unlawfully conGscated arose on the part of the American government. The treaty of 1794, which provided for Commissioners to settle these claims would, it was hoped, produce harmony ; but it is well known that it only widened the breach. At last, however, we patched up this matter: we yielded, but it was without magnar ]]i(nity~.we gave our money ; the nation was taxed to make up for the blunders of the cabinet ; but we gave without the credit of generosity. In the meanwhile, the English creditors have remained, many of them until this day, unsatisfied, while a Board of Commissioners, who have been sitting either here or in America ever since the year 1 794, or, at least, have been paid all that time, have swallowed up in expenses to the nation, a great part of what would have sufficed to satisfy our own claimants without any application for money for that purpose to the American States. In the course of this part of the dispute there was much unfairness on the part of the American Oovera- ment; and we might have been fully justified, strictly speak- ing, in coming to a rupiure upon that ground. But, we came to neither a rupture nor a reconciliation : we asserted our claima, and then gave them up ; but we took care to choose that man-' ner of doing it, which effectually took all merit from the thing. This point was hardly patched up, when another subject of dispute arose ; to that another, and another, and another, have succeeded, the long- contested question relative to the impress- ment of American seamen running through the whole. So that, at last, there has grown together a mass of disputes and of ill-blood, which threaten us with a new war, and which war threatens us with new burdens, and, still worse, which threat- ens the world with the extinguishment of some part, at least, of its remaining liberties. The points, however, more immedi- ately at issue, are those relating to the present non-importation law and the affair between the American Frigate President, and our bloop of wary the Little Belt. As to the former pointa in dispute, the Americans were the complainants : (hey called for satisfaction, and, whether they ought to have obtained it or not, it is certain that they have not yet obtained it. Upoa these two recent points, therefore, as being thought likely to lead to war, and as being so represented by those public prints which are known to be under the infiuenee of persons in power; \ m &Utr8 of Wiiliam CohhOiy JBt^ I «haU DOW proceed most respectfully to offer to your Royal Highness such remarks as the occasion appears to me to demand«$ The ^iM'Itnportation Act, that is to say, the law which ha» been passed in America to prohibit the importation ot any thing heing the growth or manufacture of Great Britain or Ireland, and which law is now in force in America, must doubtless be regarded as a measure of a hostile, though not of a warlike nature, because the same law does not apply to the enemy with whom we are at war; and, beside this commercial pro^ hibition, our ships of war are shut out from the harbours, riverSf and waters of the United States, while our enemy's shins of war are permitted freely to enter and abide in them. These are distinctions of an unfriendly nature: they are,^ indeed, mea- ■uses of hostility ; but, then, I beg your Royal Highness te baar in mind, that they are acts of a much lower degree of hos- tility than were the acts of your Royal Father's ministem against France in the Year 1 792, though they, to this hour^ contend^ that that war was a war of t^gression on the part or Fjnmce ; and, of course, their own doctrine, if now cited against thia country, would be quite sufficient on the part of America^ But thc&ct is, that the non-importation act, and the exclusion of British ships fram the waters of America, while importlsltion w permitted from France, and while French ships have free ebtrance and abidlsmce in the waters of the Uaited States, are acts of a hostile .nature, and would, if unjustified by provocft^ tnn, fully authorize, on our part, acts of reprisal and of war. ' But, sir, these measures, on the part of America, have no# been adopted without alleged provocation, and without loud^ apd reiterated remonstrances. They have^ in fact, arisen out of certain measures adopted by us, and which measures are idleged to be in violation of the rights of America as a neutral' nation ; and, therefore, before we can justify a war in conse^ quence of the hostile measures of America, we must ascertain whether her allegations against us be true ; for, if they be, we may find, perhaps, that she is not only not blamable for what she has now done, but is entitled to praise for her forbearance and moderation* That we have violated the rights of America as a neutral state, there can be no doubt. The fact is not denied ; nor i» it pretended, that the violation would not, in itself, be sufficient to justify any degree of hostility on (he part of the offended atate. Indeed, to dispute these facts, would be to show a total disregard of tf.!th ; for, we have published, and, as far as in us lies, we have carried, and still carry into execution, an iiiter» dkt a^inst all trade on the part of America, except mch eu ne choose to license. We have said to her, that she shall not irury the produce of her soil and exchange it for the produce tditm (f WiUimm Cobhdt, Es^"^ 18 df the foH of France, Italy, or HoHand. If we meet With onw of her dafm laden with the flour of PeniMylvama, and own4*d hf ft^Peaneylvanian merchant, bound to any port of the French empire, we compel such ship to come into some one of oar pdfti, ^ikl there to unlade and dispose of her cargo, or else to patf duiy upon if, before we permit her to proceed on her voy- ^e. In short, we have issued and acted upon sntih edicts at establish an absolute control and sovereignty over the fthips of America, and all that part of the population and property of America that are employed in maritime commerce. That the rights of America are herein openly violated, all the' world knows* , Tour Royal Highness need not be reminded of the dispute, so long continued, relative to the right of sttirch; that Is to say, a right, on the part of a belligerent, to search' merchant neutral ships at sea, in order to ascertain whe- ther they had on board contraband goods of war, or goods helenging to an enemy. It was contended by those who denied' the right of search, that no belligerent had a right to search a neutral at sea, in any case ; and that, if this point was given np, the goods of an enemy, in a neutral ship, ought not to t>e seised, for that tb» neutrality of the ship protected the good)!. To this doctrine English writers and statesmen have never sub- eeribed ; they insisted, that we had a right ti search neutral i^ips upon the high seas, and if wc found contraband articles, or enemy's goods on board of them, to seize them, and, in some cases, to nibke ship, as well as cargo, lawful prize. But, no statesman, no lawyer, no writer, ever pretended, that we had a right to seize in a neutral ship the goods q/* a n^tretl party* No one ever dreamt of setting up a right like this, which, in ft^ct, is neither more nor less than making war upon the neutrals ; because we do to them the very worst that we can do, short of wanton cruelty, of which the laws and usages of war do not aUow. - In justification of the adoption of these our measures towardt America, our government asserted, that France had begun the violation of the neutral rights of America, and that our measures were in the way of rvtaliation, and that the laws of war allowed of retaliation. It is a singular species of law^ which, because a weak nation has been injured by one powerful nation, subjects it to be injured by another. If Belcher we-e to beat Mr. Per- ceval and Ijord Liverpool in the street, Crib would not, for that reason, be justified in beating them too: this would, I presume, be deemed a new and most outrageous species of retaliation ; and there is little doubt that the belligerent pugilists would soon be sent to a place where they would have leisure to study the laws of war. But it is alleged by our government, that the A»ericanB submitted to the Decrees of Napoieen ; that they Vk LeUers of fTilliam Ccbbett, Esq. Mquiesced in his violation of their rights ; and that it wat foil in U8 to treat them in the same manner that he had treated them^ because they had so submitted and acquiesced. The saiue reason would apply equally well ia justification of the above supposed retaliatory measures of Crib, who also might, with just as much truth, accuse Mr. Perceval and Lord Liverpool of submission and acquiescence with regard to Belcher ; for they could not avoid submission and acquiescence to supierior Ibrce ; they might cry out, mdeed, and they would cry out ; and so did the Americans, who, from the first day to the last of the existence of the French Decrees, ceased not to remonstrate against them, and that, too, in the strongest term^ ; and, there- fore, there appears not to have beeti the slightest ground where* on to build a justification of our measures as measures of rttO' liation. But, sir, if our measures were not justifiable upon the suppo- sition that this violation of neutral rights was bejun by the enemy, surely they must be declared to be wholly without jus- tification, if it appear that we ourselves were the beginners in this career of violation of the rights of : Amecica as a neutral state ; and that this is the fact is clearly proved by the docu- nents which have long ago been laid before the public, but )wbich I beg leave to call to the recollection of your Royal- Hig:hne8S« This rivalship in the violation of neutral rights began in a declaration, on our part, made to America through her Minister, here, that she was to consider the entrances of the Ems, the Weser, the Elbe, and the Trave, as in a state of rigorous block- ade, though it was notoriously impossible for us to maintain such blockade by actual forces. The grounds for this measure were stated to be, that the King of Prussia (and not France) had forcibly and hostilely taken possession of various parts of the Electorate of Hanover and other dominions belonging to his majesty, and had shut English ships out of the Prussian ports. This might be a very good reason tor shutting the Ems, the Weser, the Elbe, and the Trave, against Prussian ships ; but, surely it gave us no right to shut them against the ships of America, whose government had had nothing to do with the King of Prussia's hostile seizure upon the Electorate of Hano- ver ; who had neither aided him, abetted him, nor encouraged him in any manner whatever ; and, it was very hard that the people of America should be made to suffer from the result of a dispute, be it what it might, between the King of Prussia and the Elector of Hanover. The King of Prussia is closely con- nected by marriage with your Royal Highness's illustrious family : it is not, therefore, for me to dare to presume that he should have been capable of any thing unbecoming his high tetters of'WUliam Cohbettt Ssq, t5 rank ; but this I may venture to say, that, whatever his conduct might be, there could be no justice in making the people, or anj portion of the people, of America suffer for that conduct. Indeed, sir, it appears to me, that to involve, in any way what ever, England in this dispute about Hanover, was not very closely conformable to that great constitutional Act by which your Royal Highness's family was raised to the throne of this kingdom, and which Act expressly declares, that in case of the family of Brunswick succecdirig to the Throne, no war shall be undertaken by England for their German dominions, unless by consent of Parliament* If the measure of blockade above mentioned had produced war on the part of Americi., that war would have been made without consent of Parliament; and, though a measure fall short of producing war, it may be equally a violation of the Act of Settlement, if its natural tendency be to produce war, or to cause England to support warlike ex- penses, which th^s measure manifestly has done, and has, at last, led to something very nearly approaching to open war with America, though, in the mean while, Hanover itself has been wrested from the King of Prussia, and formed into a member of another kingdom. Thus, then, at any rate, this attack upon the rights of neutrals did not begin with France. If it was not begun by us, it was begun by the King of Prussia, though it is not very easy to perceive how he could violate the maritime rights of America by any act of his in the heart of Germany. The Decrees of France have grown out of our measures. They carry in them- selves the proof of this. The first (for there are but two) is- sued from Berlin, was expressly grounded upon our Orders issued in consequence of the conduct of the King of Prussia in Hanover ; and thus the Emperor Napoleon became, towards us, the avenger, as far as be was able, of that very King of Prussia, whom he had just driven from his dominions ! Alas,. sir, what a scene was here exhibited to the people of Europe ! First the King of Prussia, closely related to the family of the King of England, seizes upon the German dominions of the latter : the latter protests against this, and, by his Secretary of State, de- clares that he never will make peace without obtaining the re- storation of these dominions : while this quarrel is going on. Na- poleon marches against the king of Prussia, defeats him, drives him from his dominions, takes Hanover, the object in dispute, and bestows it on a third party ; and, from the capital of the king of Prussia's dominions, issues a decree against England, avenging the cause of the king of Prussia ! Napoleon, in this his first Decree, declares England (who had, by this time, extended Iter blockade from the Elbe to the Port of Brest) in a stale o/blockadef and prohibits all trade and all m Lettera of William CobhOtj E»q. V (i commercial communication with finglaod. But, this Decree^ which was little less practicable m all cases than our blockade^ was declared to be retaliaiorj/t and was to be repealed when* •ver England repealed her Orders in Council which had then been issued. Certainly this was not the begianit^ We had be- gan, and that, too, under the administration of those who have vkice so loudly censured the Orders in Council ; and, which must, I presume, be a subject of regret with your Royal High- ness, the state paper in which this beginnilig was announced to the American government, came from the pen of Mr. Fox, who appears to have yielded implicitly to the principles of bis new associates in politics. At any rate, this Decree of the Emperor Napoleon was not the beginning of Ihe open attacks upon neu* tral rights ; and, what is of still more importance, it was not Jiapoleon, but it was the king of PrusaiOt who committed those acts of aggression in Hanover which produced our first of that series of measures, called the Orders in Council, and which meai- aures have finally led to the exclusion of our goods and our ships from the American ports. This is a fact of great import- ance in the dispute, aiid especially if that dispute should end in war. It will be right, in that case, for us to bear in mind the real grounds of the war ; the true origin of it. And, endi^avour to cast the blame where we will, it will, at last, be found in the ag* gres8ion of the king of Prussia upon Hanover, The Berlin Decree broaght forth ne / Orders in Council from US ; and these broughr from the Emperor Napoleon the Decree issued at Milan, in December, 1 807. This ended the series of invasions of neutral rights ; for, indeed, nothing more was now left to invade. Both parties called their measures retaliatory. Crib having taken a blow upon a third party in the way of re- taliation on Belcher, Belcher takes another blow upon the same party in the way of retaliation on Crib. Both parties declared, that they were perfectly ready to repeal their Decrees ; that they regretted exceedingly the necessity of adopting them ; each explicitly promised, that, whenever the other gave up the new restrictions, he would also give them up too. Napoleon S9id his measures had been forced upon him by us : we said our measures had been forced upon us by him. The Americans, who complained of both, were told by us, that we should always be ready to revoke our Orders if the enemy would revoke hia Decrees. This was saying very little, seeii^ that his Decrees had been issued in consequence of our Orders, and, of course* be was net to be expected to •'evoke first, especially as the De- crees themselves declare that their object is to cause our Orders to be revoked. The American government, having remonstrated so long in ■Tail)) and seeing no likelihood of obtaining redrMs by the Letters of William Cohbetty Es^, ir means of diplomatic entreaties, and yet not wishing to plunge the country into a war, resort to the measure of exclusion from their porta, giving to both parties an opportunity of preventing the execution even of this measure of demi- hostility. During the session of Congress in 1809-10, a law was passed providing, that if both France and England continued in their violation of the rights of America until and after the 1 st day of November, 1810, the ships and goods of both should be prohibited from entering the ports and waters of the American States ; that if they both repealed their obnoxious Decrees and Orders, then the ships and goods of both were to have free admission ; that if one party repealed and the other did not, then the ships and goods of the repealing party were to be admitted, and the ships and goods of the non-repealing party were to be excluded* Napoleon, the Americans say, has repealed : we have not, and, accordingly, our ships and goods are excluded, while those of France are admitted into the waters and ports of tue United States* This is one source of the present ill blood against America, who is dLCcmedof partinlity^io France; but before this charge can be established, we must show that the measures she has adopted are not the natural and necessary result of an im- partial measure ; a measure in execution of an impartial law. If a pardon were tendered to Belcher and Crib upon condition that they ceased to beat the parties as above supposed, and if BeU 3 u iteUers of William Cohhetl, Esq. tioti (hey think thdre has been a change for the better. Thejr may be deceived ; bat it can be the interest of nobody to de- ceive them. Those who have the management of their pubKe iflbirs may have a wrong bias ; but they cannot commonirate it to the people ; for they halve no public money to expend ifpon a hireling press. The government and people may all be deceived ; bnt the deception cannot be the effect of any cheat practised upon either ; it cannot be the work of bribery and co^ption. If, therefore, the government and people of Arae- rica do really entertain a partiality for Napoleon, we have, oit that account, good ground for regret, but certainly none for complaint or reproach. They have a right to like and to dis* like whom they please. We, for instance, have a great attach- ment to the court and government of Sicily, and also to the courtii and ancient governments of Spain and Portugal. We should riot permit the American government or people to intei- fere with these attachments of ours ; and, I presume, it will, therefore, not be thought reasonable that we should arrogate to ourselves the right of judging whom the American people and government are to like. When we are told of the " partiality for France,'* which is a charge continually preferred against the American government, f^e should ask what acts of partiality they have been guiHy of, and that is the test by which we ought to try their conduct in the present instance. They have put their law in force ; they liave shut out our goods and our ships, while they freely admit those of France; and this is called partiality, and is made the grounds of one of those charges, by the means of which, it ap* liears to me, that the venal press in England is endeavouring to Srepare the minds of the people for a war with the American Itates. But, to make out this charge, it must be shown, that the French have done nothing that we have not done in the way of repealing the injurious Decrees. Indeed, this is what is asserted ; and, though a regular communication has been made to the American government by the French government, that the Berlin and Milan Decrees are revoked ; though they are by the American Minister here asserted to be revoked, and no longer in operation ; still it is asserted by some here, that they are not revoked. The American government, however, ii satisfied that they are revoked, and it has, accordingly, put itf exclusion law in force against ua. To settle this point of fact the Americans have not been told what sort of evidence we shall require. They present us the letter of the French minister for foreign affairs to the Ame- rican minister at Paris, telling him that the Decrees are revokedf and that the revocation is to go into effect on the 1st of Novem- ber, 1810. This We say is notbin| at all, because it is clogged LdUra of WiiXiom Cobbi^tt Btq* l» wilh this remark, " it being clearly mderatood thai the Engliah Orders in Council are to be revoked at the acme time*" Cer- tainly. This was to be naturally expected ; and England had promised that it should be so. The Decrees have actually been revoked, without this condition being complied witli on our part; but, if they had not, it was to be expected that the American government would put their exclusion law in force agunst lu at the tjme appointed ; because we ought to have declared ouf. intention at the same time, and in the same manner that tfm French declared their intention. It was in the month of August, 1810, that Mr. Pinckney, the American minister in London, communicated to our Foreign Secretary, Lord Welleskf, ihat the French decrees were revoked, and that the revocation wai to take effect from the 1st day of the then ensuing November* The answer which Mr. Pinckney expected, was, that the En- glish Orders in Council were also revoked, and that the revoca- tion would take effect from the Ist of November. That he had a right to expect this will clearly appear from the communications made to the American government by our ministers in that coun- try, who, in answer to the complaints of America upon (his score, always declared that the king, their master, was exceedingly grieved to be compelled to have recourse to such measures ; that nothing could be further from his heart, or more repugnant to his feelings, than a wish to injure or harass the commerce of neutrals ; that he had taken these odious measures in pure self defence ; that it was his ** earnest desire** (I quote one of these declarations) " to see the commerce of the world restored to that freedom which is necessary for its prosperity, and his rea- diness to abandon the system, which had been ybrced upon him, whenever the enemy should retract the principles which had rendered it necessary." When, therefore, Mr. Pinckney, who had this declaration before him, comipunicated to Lord Welles- ley the fact that the French Decrees were revoked, anJ that the revocation was to go into effect on the 1st of November, he had a full right to expect an immediate revocation of our Or- ders in Council, and an assurance that such revocation should go into effect on the same day when the French revocation was to go into effect. But, instead of this, he received for answer, that we would revoke our Orders when the revocation of tha French Decrees should have actually taken place* But there was another condition, " that whenever the repeal of the French Decrees shall have actually taken place^ and the commerce of neutral nations shall have been restored to the condition in which it stood previously to the promulgation of these DecreeSf* then the King will relinquish his present system. Here is a second condition. We do not here content ourselves with the revocation of the Decrees ; no, nor 9ven with that revocati<^ flU Letters of IVUliam Cohbell, Esq, having actually gone into effect. We call for lomelhing morei and th fore contended. We here say, that, before we revoke our Or- ders, we till have the neutral commerce restored to its old foot- ing ; that is, that we will have the *' Continental System*' aban- doned by France, with which system the Americans have no*, thing to do, and with regard to which they can have no right to say a word, it being a series of measures of internal regulation^ not trenching upon nor touching their maritime commerce. It is a matter wholly distinct from the other; it relates to the re- ception or exclusion of English goods in France and her depen- dencies ; and, if we are to make America answerable for the conduct of France in that respect, it would follow that France would have a right to make her answerable for our conduct in excluding the goods of France from the ports of England. W^e had, it appears to me, no right to require any thing of America, previously to our revocation of the obnoxious Orders, than an official and authenticated declaration that the French Decrees were revoked. And what paore could we ask for than was tendered to us, I am at a loss to conjecture. The French government officially informed the American government that the Decrees were revoked, and that the revocation was to havtt t effect on the Ist of November. This was officially communi- ' cated to us by the American government through their accre- dited minister. We were, therefore, to give credit to the fact* But no : we stop to see the Ist of November arrive. This was not the way to convince America of our readiness, our earnest desire, to see neutral commerce restored to freedom. The course to pursue, in order to give proof of such a disposition, was to revoke our Orders in Council, and to declare that the revocation would begin to be acted upon on the Ist of November. This would have been keeping pace with the French ; and, if we had found that the revocation did not go into operation in France on the 1st of November, we should have lost nothing by our re- vocation ; for we might immediately have renewed our Orders in Council, and we should then have continued them in force, having clearly thrown all the blame upon the enemy. This line of conduct would, too, have been perfectly conso- nant with our professions to the American government, to whom, in 1 808, our minister had declared, that, in order to evince the sincerity of our desire to remove the impediments to neutral commerce, we were willing to follow tlie example of France in the way of revocation, or, to proceed step for step with her in the way of relaxation. Our minister, upon the occasion here alluded to, in communicating the several Orders in Council to the American government, declared that " the king felt great regret at the nscessUy imposed upon him for such an interfe- Letters of William Cohhett, Esq. SI rence with neutral commerce, and he aasured the American government, that hit Majesty would readily follow the exampltf in case the Berlin Decree should be rescmded ; or, would pro- ceed, part poem with France, in relaxing the rigour of their measures/' Agreeablj to this declaration, we should, it clear- ly appears to me, have done exactly what France did in Au» gust, IBIO, and not evaded it by saying that we would revoke after her revocation should have been actually put into opera- tion ; that is to say, that we would condescend to b^n after France had ended. This is the view, may it please your Royal Highness, which clear and unclouded reason takes of this matter. This is the light in which it has been seen by the American government, and by the people of that country, who, though they do not wish for war, will assuredly not censure those who manage their affairs for acting as they have done upon this occasion. The measure of exclusion adopted against us by America is too advantageous to France for the latter not to act upon the revocation of her Decrees ; and, indeed, there appears now not to be the smallest doubt, that, as far as relates to America, (and she is in reality tbe only neutral,) the Decrees are, in deed as well as in word, revoked. It is notorious that our Orders are not revoked ; and, for my part, I am wholly at a loss to form an idea of the grounds upon which any complaint against America can be founded, as far as relates to this part of the dispute. In a future Letter I shall submit to your Royal Highness soihe remarks relating to the affair of the Little Beltt and shall endeavour to lay before you the real state of that case, and the consequences which would naturally arise from a rupture with America, or from a prolongation of the present quarrel. I am, &c. &c. Wm. Corbett. j?tate PruoD, Neirsate, Tliunday, 29th August, ISII. LETTER n. Sir, TO THE PRINCE REGENT. Intelligence!, received since the date of the former Let- ter which I did myself the honour to address to your Royal Highness, makes it more imperious upon us to examine well the grounds upon which we are proceeding with regard to the American States. The President has called the Congress to- gether; and there can be little doubt of his object being to pro^ I S2 Ldten of William Cohheit, Esq. poie to them, for tbeir approbation, boom measure more of a warlike character than any which be haa hitherto adopted; nor can we it aeemi to me, be at all aurprised z* this, if, as is rumour* ed, it be true that Mr. Foster, our new minister in America, has made a communication to the American government, making the revocation of our OrdeiH in Council depend upon the con- duct of Napoleon as to the Continental System. The rise and progress of the Orders in Council and of the FrtiM'h Decrees have already been noticed, and suflSciently dwt-li upon ; it has been shown, that the grounds of the present dispiitt:, namely, the flagrant violation of neutral rights, did not originate with France, but with England, or, if not with England, Willi Prussia: it has been shown, and no one will attempt to den^ the fact, that the French Decrees were passed after the issuing of our Orders in Council ; that they were passed ex- pressly in the way of retaliation ; that they were to be revoked when we revoked our Orders. It has been shown that we professed to be animated with a sincere and most earnest desire to revoke our Orders, and, indeed, that we express'^ declared that we would revoke them whenever the French would revoke their Decrees. It has been shown that the French officially informed the American government that the Decrees were revoked, and that, thereupon, the American government called upon us to fulfil our promises in revoking our Orders ; but that we did not do this ; that we evaded the fulfilment of these pro* mises, and, in short, that we have net revoked, or softened the rigour of any part of our Orders. It has, in a word, been shown, that while the French have revoked their Decrees, while thej, in fonsequence of the remonstrances of America, have ceased to violate her neutral rights, we persevere in such violation* The pretext for this was, at first, that the Emperor Napoleon, though he said he had revoked his Decrees, had not done it, and meant not to do it. This, may it please your Royal High- ness, was, it appears to me, a very strange kind of language to use towards other powers. It was treating the American go- vernment as a sort of political ideot. It was telling it that it did not understand the interests of America, and that it was un* worthy to be entrusted with power. And, it was saying to the Emperor of France, that he was to be regardeo as shut out of the pale of sovereigns ; that he was on no account to be believed ; that no faith was to be given to the official communications of his ministers, or of any persons treating in his name. Thus, then, the door against peace, against exchange of prisoners, against a softening of the rigours of war in any way, or in any degree, was forever barred ; and the termination of war was, in thct, made to depend upon the death of Napoleon* But this pretext could not last long ; for the Decrees were JLHUn rought hither ; in short, it is notorious that no article being the manufacture or produce of France is permitted to be brought into England ; and that seizure, confiscation, fine, imprisonment, and ruin attend all those who act in infraction of this our com- mercial code. This being the case, it does seem to require an uncommon portion of impudence or of self conceit for us to demand of the 24 Letteri of William Cuhbetty Eiq. I I f Americans to cause the Continental System to be abandoned ar condition upon which we are willing to cease to violate their rights. But it has been said, that Napoleon enforces hia system with so much rigour and barbarity. This does not at all alter the state of the case between us and America, who has no power, and, if she had the power, who has no right, to inter- fere with his internal regulations. Yet, sir, it is not amiss to inquire a little into the fact of this alleged barbarity of Napoleon. All rulers are content with accomplishing their object; and, in this case, it wculd not be his interest to inflict greater penalties than the accomplishing of his object required. Our own laws against smuggling are not the mildest in the world ; and we have seen them hardened, by degrees, till they answered the purpose that the government had in view. We have been told, indeed, thai Napoleon punishes offences against his commer- cial code with enormous fines, with imprisonment, and we have heard of instances where he has resorted to the puuishment of death. These severities have been made the subject of most grievous complaints against him here ; they have brought down upon him reproaches the most bitter : they have been cited as proofs indubitable of the intolerable despotism under whkh his people groan. But, sir, I have confidence enough in your justice and magnanimity to remind you, that there is nothing which hit commercial code inflicts ; that there is nothing in any of the pun- ishments that even rumour has conveyed to our ears ; no, nothing in any of these surpassing in seventy ; nay, nothing in any of them equalling in severity, the punishments provided for in the commercial code of England, having for their object, towards France, precisely that in view which the Continental System has in view towards England, namely, her embarrassment, and, finally, her overthrow. In support of this assertion I could cite many of the arcts in our statute book ; but f allude particularly to that which was passed in the month of May, 1793, at the breaking out of the war against the republicans of France. That act, which ap- pears to have been drawn up by the present Lord Chancellor, makes it high treason, and punishes with death, and also with forfeiture of estates, all those persons, residing or being in Great Britain, who shall have any hand whatever, either directly or indirectly, in selling any goods (mentioned in the said act) to the French government, or to any body residing in French terri- tories. This act punishes, in the same awful manner, any one who shall send a bank note to any one residing in the French territory, or shall have any hand, in the most distant manner, in causing such notes to be sent. It punishes in the same manner any person, residing or being in Great Britain, who shall have any hand in purchasing any real property in any country under Letlera of William CobbetU ^sq* U 4he dominion of France ; and it extends its vengeance to alt those, who, in the most distant manner, shall have any band in ■uch transaction. This act is the 27th chap, of the 33d year •f the reign of George the Third ; and I have never seen and never heard of any act or edict that dealt out death and de- struction with BO liberal a hand. It was said at the time, by the present Lord Chancellor, and by the greater part of those men who compose your Royal Highness's ministry, that this act, terrible as it was, was de- manded by the safety of the nation. This Mr. Fox denied, and he strenuously laboured to prevent the passing of an act so •evere. I shall oft'er no opinion upon this matter ; but it is cer- tain that the code of Napoleon is not, because it cannot be, more terribly severe than this act ; and this being the case, common decency ought to restrain those who justified this act from uttering reproaches against the author of the continental code. Our government then said, that the act of 17U3 was ' necessary, in order to crush the revolution that had reared its head in France, and that was extending its principles over Eu- rope. They justified the act upon the ground of its necessity. So does Napoleon his code. He says, that that code is neces- sary to protect the continent agamst the maritime despotism and the intrigues of England. His accusations against us may be false, but he is only retorting upon us our accusations against France ; and between two such powers, there is nobody to judge. In truth, our government passed its act of 1 7U3, be- cause it bad the will and the power to pass and to enforce it ; and Napoleon has established his continental system, because he also has the will and the power. It is to the judgment of the world that the matter must be left, and I beseech your Royal Highness to consider, that the world will judge of our conduct according to the evidence which it has to judge from, and that that judgment will leave wholly out of view our interests and our humours. To return, and apply what has here been said to the case on which I have the honour to address your Royal Highness, what answer would have been given to America, if she, in the year 1793, had demanded of our government the rescinding of the act of which I have just given a faint description ? In sup- , posing, even by the way of argument, America to have taken such a liberty, I do a violence to common sense, and commit an 4; outrage upon dipldmatic decorum ; and it is quite impossible to put into words an expression of that indignation which her con- duct would have excited. And yet, sir, there appears to me to be no reason whatever for our expecting America to be per- mitted to interfere with Napoleon's continental system, unless we admit that she had a right to interfere with our act of 1793; 26 Letters of IVilliam Cohbettt Esq, i The dispute between lis and America relates to the acknoir« ledged riglilB of neutral nations. These rights of America we avow that we viulate. We have hitherto said, that we were ready to cease uuch violation as soon as the French did the same ; but now-, if we are to believe the intelligence from Ame- rica, and the corresponding statements of c:;r public prints, wo have shifted our ground, and demand of America that she shall cause the continental system to be done away, or, at least, wc tell her that it shall be done away, or we wjll not cease to violate ber rights. The language of those who appear to be ready to justify a refusal, upon the ground above stated, to revoke our Orders in Council, is this : that it was natural to expect that the revoca^ tion would be made to depend upon a real and effectual aboli' tion of the French Decrees ; that the revocation is merely no- minal unless all the regulations of Napoleon, made since lii06, are also repealed ; that, when these latter are repealed, it will be right for America to call upon us for a repeal of our Orders in Council, and not before ; and, it is added, that the American President will not have the support of the people, if he attempt to act upon any other principles than these. Ho that, as your Royal Highness will clearly perceive, these persons imasine, or, at least, they would persuade the people of England, that un- less the President insist upon the admission of English manu» factures and produce into the dominions of France, he will not be supported by the people of Auierica, in a demand of En- gland, to cease to violate the known and acknowledged rights of America. The President is not asking lor any indulgence at our bands : he is merely asking for what is due to his country ; be is merely insisting upon our ceasing to violate the rights of America; and, if what the public prints tell us be true, we say in answer : " We will cease to violate your rights ; we will cease to do you wrong ; we will cease to confiscate your vessels in the teeth of the law of nations ; but not unless Napoleon will suffer the continent of Europe to purchase our manufactures and commerce." If ray neighbour complain of me for a griev- ous injnry and outrageous insult committed agamst him, am I tp answer him by saying, that I will cease to injure and insult him> when another neighbour with whom I am at variance will pur> chase his clothing and cutlery from me ? The party whom I injure and insult will naturally say, that he has nothing to do with my quarrel with a third party. We should disdain the idea of appealing to America as a mediatress, and, indeed, if nhe were to attempt to put herself forward in that capacity, in- dignation and vengeance would ring from one end of the king- dom tq tbe otiier. Yet we are, it seeqii, to look to hei( tQ cai^sf m M Ldtm of JP'tlliam Cobhetty Esq, ^t the French to do away regulations injurious to us, but wkh ivhich America has nothing at all to do. As to (he diapositirn of the people of America, your Royal Hii^hness should receive with great distrust whatever is said^ come from what quarter it may, respecting the popular feeling being against the President and his measures* The same round of deception will, doubtless, be used here as in all other case^ where a country is at war with us. It is now nearly twenty years since we drew the sword against revolutionary France ; and if ;>our Royal Highness look back, >'0U will find, thatj during the whole of that period, the people of France have been, by those who have had the power of the press in their hands in this country, represented as hostile to their govern* ment, under ail its various forms, and as wishing most earnestly for the success of its enemies. The result, however, has been^ that the people have never, in any one instance, aided those enemies ; but have made all sorts of sacrifices for the purpose of frustrating their designs. On the Contrary', the people in all the countries allied with us in the war, have been invariably represented as attached to their government, and they have^ when the hour of trial came, as invariably turned from that go- vernment, and received the French with open arms. Aflet these twenty years of such terrible experience, it is not for me to presume, that your Royal Highness can sutfer youiself to be deceived with regard to the disposition ot the American peo* pie, who clearly understand all the grounds of the present dis« piite, and of whom, your Royal Higimess may be assured, Mr* Madison, in his demands of justice at our hands, is but the echo. The Americans do not wish for war : war is a state which they dread : (here is no class amongst them who can profit from war : they have none of that description of people to whom war is a harvest : there are none of those whom to support out of the public wealth the pretext of war is necessary : they dread a standing army : they have witnessed the eifects of such establishments in other parts of the world : tney have seen how such establishments and loss of freedom go hand in band« Bui these considerations will not, I am persuaded, deter them from going far enough into hostile measures to do great injury to us, unless we shall, by our acts, prove to them that such measures are unnecessary. The public are told, and the same may reach the ear of your Royal Hitfliness, (fOr courts are not the places into which truth first makes its way,) that the American President is unpopu-' lar; that the people are on OMr side in the dispute. Guard your ear, 1 lieseech you, sir, against such reports, which are trhollv false, and which have tlieir rise partly in the ignorance^ and partly in the venality of those by whom they are propa« ■(■* '^t •U- 29 Letters qf William Cobbeitj Esq, gated. It is a fact, on which your Royal Highness may rely^ that at the Iftst election (in the autumn of 1810) the popular parry had a majority far greater than at any former period ; and it is hardly necewary tor me to say how that party stands with regard to England ; for, from some cause or other, it does so happen, that in every country where there is a description of persons professing a strong and enthusiastic attachment to public liberty, they are sure to regard England as their ene- my. We are told that these are all sham patriots ; that they are demagogues, jacobins, levellers, and men who delight in confusion and bloodshed. But, sir, the misfortune is, that these persons, in all the countries that we meddle with, do in- variably succeed in the end. Their side proves, at last, to be the strongest. They do, in fact, finally prove to form almost the whole of the people ; and, when we discover this, we gene- rally quit their country in disgust, and, since they *' will not be true to themselves,'* we even leave them to be punished by their revolutions and reforms. In America, however, it tvijl, I think, be very difficult for any one to persuade your Royal Highness that those who are opposed to us are sham patriots, and men who wish for confusion. Every man in that country; has enough to eat ; every man has something to call his own. There are no baits for sham patriots ; no fat places to scr^imble for ; no sinecures where a single lazy possessor snorts away is the course of the year the fruit of the labour of hundreds of toiling and istarving wretches ; none of those things, in short, for the sakeof gaining which it is worth while to make hypocritical professions of patriotism. As an instance of the sentiments of the people of Ame.tca with regard to political parties, I beg leave to point out to your Royal Highness the circumstance of Mr. Pickering (^who is held forth as the great champion of our cause in America) having, at the last election, been put out of the Senate of the United States, of which he had long been a member, being one of the Senators for Massachusetts, his native state. The people of the state, first elect the two Houses and the Governor of the state, and these elect the persons to serve them in the Senate of the union. Thus Mr. Pickering was, then, rejected, not merely by the people ; not merely at a popu- br election ; but by the deliberate voice of the whole legisla- ture of the state And this, too, in that part of the unioa called New-England ; in the state of Massachusetts too, which •tate, it is well known, takes the lead in the northern part of the country, and which state has always been represented as dis- posed to divide from the states of the south. If we had friends any where in America, it was in this state ; and yet, even in this state, we see the most unecj^uivocal proof of disaffection t» •ur cause. Leltera of William Cohbdly Esq, 39 It ia useless, sir, for us to reproach the people of America "ivith this disaffection. They must be left to follow their own taste. In common life, if we find any one that does not like ub» we generally endeavour, if we wish to gain his liking, to win him to it by kindness and by bene&ts of some sort or other. We go thus to work with animals of every description. In cases where we have the power, we but too often make use of that to subdue the disinclined party to our will. But, where we have not the power, we are seldom so very foolish as to deal out reproaches against those whose good will we do not take the pains to gain. It is, therefore, the height of folly in us to com- plain that the Americans do not like our government, and pre- fer to it that of Napoleon. The friends of England accuse them of giving support to a despoU They do not love despots, sir, you may be assured ; and, if they like Napoleon better than they do our government, it is because they think him less inimical to their freedom and their property. This is the ground of their judgment. They are not carried away by words : they look at the acts that affect tljiem ; and, upon such grounds, they might, under some circumstances, justly prefer the Dey of Algiers to the ruler of any other state. I am, &c. &c. Wm. Cobbbtt.- State PriioB, Newgate, Thundaj, 5th September, 1811. f LETTER IIL TO THE PRINCE REGENT : Sir, Before I enter upon the affair of the American frigate and the Little Belt, permit me to call your Royal Higliness's atten- tion, for a moment, to the servility of the English Press, and to offer you some remarks thereon. Towards the end of last week, a Council having been held, and an Order relative to American commerce having been agreed upon, it was, by those who merely knew that some or- der of this kind was about to come forth, taken for granted, tL-t it contained a prohibition against future import? Jrom the yimerican States into this country, by way of retal»tion for the American non-importation act. There needed no more. The busy slaves of the press, who endeavour even to antici- pate the acts of government, be they what they may, with their approbation, lost not a moment. This « measure of re- taliaUon,** as they called it, was then an instance of perfect 90 LetUrs of U^illiam Cobbett, t^sq. wisdom in your Royal Highnesses ministers : it was a meaatfre become absolutely necessary to our safety as well as our ho« nour ; and, indeed, if it had not been adopted, wc are told, that the ministers would have been highly criminal. Alas I it was all a mistake : there was no such measure adopted f and, oh ! most scandalous to relate ! these same writers dis- covered, all in a moment, that it would have been premature to adopt such a measure at present ! I have mentioned this fact with a view of putting your Royal Highness upon your guard against the parasites of the press, who (though it may be a bold assertion to make] are the worst of parasites, even in England. " Hang them scurvy jades, they would have done no less if Caesar had murdered their mothers," said Casca of the strumpets of Rome, who affected to weep when Caesar fainted, and who shouted when he came to again. And be your Royal Highness well assured, that these same writers would have applauded your ministers, if, instead of an Order in Council to prohibit the importation of American produce, they had issued an order to strip the skin over the ears of the Roman Catholics, or to do any other things however tyrannical, however monstrous, it might have been.' Suffer yourself not, then, sir, to be persuaded to act, in any case, from what is presented to you in the writings of Inese parasites. Reflect, sir, upon the past. During the whole of the last twenty years, these same writers have praised all the measures of the government. All these measures were, accord- ing to them, the fruit of consummate wisdom. Yet these mea- sures have, at last, produced a state of things exactly the con- trary of what was wished for and expected. All the measures which have led to the victories and conquests of France, that have led to her exaltation, that have produced all that we now behold in our own situation, the paper money not excepted ; all these measures have received, in their turn, the unqualified approbation of the parasites of the press. To know and bear in mind this fact will be, I am certain, sufficient to guard your Royal Highness against forming your opinion of measures from what may be said of them by this tribe of time-serving writers, who have been one of the principal causes of that state of things in Europe, which is, even with themselves, the burden of in- cessant and unavailing lamentation. B"'~naparte ! "The Cor- Bican Ty/ant !" The " towering despot." Buonaparte ! Alas ! sir, the fault is none of his, and all the abuse bestowed upon him should go in another direction. The fault is in those who contrived and who encouraged the war against the republicans of France ; and amongst Ihiem, there are in all the world none fo equal the parasites of the t^nglish press. In returning, now, to the afiair of the American frigate and Lellers of mUiam Cobbettt Esq. m the LltUe Belt, the first thing would be, to ascertain which vessel Jired the first shot. The comniaiiders on both bides deny huving fued first; and, if their words are thus at vari- ance, the decisions of courts of inquiry will do little in the way of settling the point. This fact, therefore, appears to me not callable of being decided. There is no court wherein to t.y it. We do not acknowledge a court in Auierica, and the Americans do not acknowledge a court here. Each govern- ment believes its own officer, or its own courts of inquiry ; and, if the belief of the A^nerican government is opposed to what ours believe, there is no decision but by an appeal to arms. But there is a much better way of settling the matter ; and that is, to say no more about it, which may be done without any stain upon the honour of either party. And this jh the most desirable, if the supjiosed attack upon the Little Bolt can pos- sibly be made, in some general settlement ot disputes, to form a set-off against the affair of the Chesapeake. Yet, may it please your Royal liij^hness, there is a view of this matter which it is very necessary for you to take, and which will never be taken by any of the political parasites in this country. We are accustomed to speak of this supposed attack upon the Little Belt, as if it had taken place out at sea, and as if there had been no alleged provocation ever given to the American ships of war. But, air, tiie Americans allege, that the Little Belt was found in their waters; that she was one of a squadron that formed a sort of blockade of their coast ; that this squadron stopped, rummaged, and insulted their mer- chantmen ; and that, in many cases, it seized and carried away their own people out of their own ships within sight of their own shores. The way for us to judge of the feelings that such acts were calculated to inspire in the bosoms of the Ame- ricans, is, to make the cause our own for a moment ; to suppose an American squadron off our coast, stopping, rummaging, and insulting our colliers, and, in many cases, taking away their sailors to serve them; to be exposed to the loss of life in that service ; and, at the very least, to be taken from their calling and their families and friends. Your Royal Elighness would, I trust, risk even your life rather than suffer this with impunity ; and you-would, I am sure, look upon your people as unworthy of existence, if they were not rea- dy to bleed in such a cause. Your Royal Highness sees, f am fully- persuaded, but one side of the question, witli regard to America. The venal prints present you with publications made by the enemies of the men at present in power in America; that is to say, by the opposifton of that country. But the fact is, that afi parties agree in their complaints against our seizure of their «eameij, with iqatances of which their public prints abound. X V I iSt Letters of William Cobbettt Ssq. This is a thing so completely without a parallel, that oM can hardly bring one's self to look upon it as a reality For an Ame- rican vessel to meet a packet between Cork and Bristol, and take out some of her sailors, and carry them away to the East or West Indies to die or be killed, is something so monstrous, that one cannot bring one's self to feel as if it were real. Yet, this it no more than what the Americans complain of; and if there be good ground, or only slight ground ; if there be any ground at all, for such complaint, the afifair between the Ame- rican frigate and the Little Belt is by no means a matter to be wondered at. I beg your Royal Highness to consider hovr many families in the American states have been made unhappy by the impressment of American seamen ; how many parents have been thus deprived of their sons, wives of their husbands, and children of their fathers ; and, when you have so consider* ed, you will not, 1 am sure, be surprised at the exultation that appears to have been felt in America at the result of the affair with the Little Belt. As a specimen of the complaints of individuals npon this score, I here insert a letter from an unfortunate impressed Ame* rican, which letter 1 take from the New- York Public Advertiser of the 3l8t July: *^ Port Royaly Jamaica^ ^thJune, 18)1. Mr. Snowden, I hope you will be so good as to publis u these few lines. I, Etiwin Bonldin, was impressed out of the barque Columbus, of Elizalteth City, Captain Traftor, and carried on board bis Britannic Majesty's brig Rhodian, in Montego Bay, commanded by Captain Mobary. He told me my protection was of no consequence, he would have me whether or not. I was born in Baltimore, and served my time with Messrs. Smith and Buchanan. 1 hope my friends will do something for me to get my clearance, for I do not like to serve any other country but my own, which I am willing to serve. I am now captain of the forecastle, and stationed captain of a gun in the waist. I am treated very ill because I will not enter. They request of me to go on board my country's ships to list men, which f refused to do, and was threatened to be punished for it.— —I remain a true citizen of the United States of America, Edwin Bouldin." -——This, may it please your Royal Highness, is merely a spe- cimen. The public prints in America abound with documents of a similar description ; and thus the resentment of the whole nation is kept alive, and wound up to a pitch hardly to be de^ scribed. Astonishment is expressed by some persons in this country that the Americans appear to like the Emperor Napoleon bet- ter than our government : but if it be considered that the Em- peror Napoleon does not give rise to complaints such as those just quoted, this astonishment will cease. Men dislike those Letters of William Cobbett, Esq. one can lu Ame* md take East or US, that , thia it if there be any e Ame- er to be Jer how inhappy parents usbanda, ".onsider- lion that he affair pon this ied Ame* dvertiaer e, 18t1. Wa these le barque rried on ;go Bay, rotection not. I '8. Smith or me to country plain of t. I am t of me refused main a lULDIN," ly a spe* Icuments whole be de* Icountry Ion bet- Ihe Em- IB those Le thoBe who do them injury, and they dislike those moat who do them roost injury. In settling the point, which is most the friend of r<«//reef/om, Napoleon or our government, there might, how- ever, be some difference of opinion in America, where the peo- ple are free to speak and write asnlgreil hm (o think, and whert there are no persons whose trade it is to publish falsehoods. But, whatever error any persons might be led into upon Ihii subject, the consequence to us would be tritlins;, were it not for the real solid grounds of compUints that are inrpHsiantly staring the Atn«rir.aM people in the face. There may be a very harsh despotism in France, for any thing that ihey know to the conJrary ; though they are not a people to be canted away by mere names. They are a people likely to sit down coolly, and cornpai-e the present state of Fiance with its state under the Bourbon*^ ; likely to compare the present situation of the great mass of the people with their former situation; and extremely likely not to think any the worse of Napoleon for his having sprung from parents as humble as those of their Jefferson or Madison. But, if they should make up their minds to a settled conviction of there being a military despotism in France, they will, though they regret its existence, dislike it less than they will any other system, from which they receive more annoy- ance ; and in this they do no more than follow the dictates of human nature, which, is spite of all the wishes of man, will still continue the same* The disposition of the American people towards England and 1 towards France is a matter of the greatest impoi tance, and fihuuld, therefore, be rightly understood by your Buyal High- ness, who has it in your power to restore between America and England that harmony, which has so long been disturbed, and which is so necessary to save the remains of freedom in the world. I here present to you, sir, some remarks of a recent date, ('25th July,) published in an American print, called the *< Baltimukb American.*' You will see, sir, that the writer deprecates a war with England ; he does not deceive himself or his readers as to its dangers ; he makes a just estimate of the relative means of the two nations; and I think your Royal Highness will allow, that he is not ignorant of //»c real situation of Fhigland. I cannot help being earnest in my wishes that your Royal Highness would be pleased to bestow some atten- tion upon these remarks. They are, as a composition, not un- ' worthy of the honour ; but, what renders them valuable is, that they do really express the sentiments of all the moderate part of the people in America; they express the sentiments which predominate in the community, and upon which, your Royal Highness may be assured, the American government will act. " God forbid that we should have war with England, or any 5 v /> I.' I'l .1' ^ ', ■' 9k Letters of William Cobbett, Esq. other nation, if we can avoid it. For I am not of the temper of that furious federalist, who would have unfurled the Ameri- can colours long ago against a less offender. 1 had rather see her starry flag floating in the serenity of a calm atmosphere, than agitated and obscured iaJ;|ie clouds, the smoke, and flashes of war. But if Britain's unchangeable jealousy of the prosperity ofotherH, her obdurate pride and enmity to us, should proceed upon pretence of retaliating upon what she has forced, to more violent and avowed attacks, I trust that your older and younger Americans will meet her with equal spirit, and give her blow for blow. I have never expected her to abstain from injury while our merchants had a ship, or our country a seaman, upon the ocean, by any sense of justice — but have trusted only to the adverse circumstances of her state, to restrain her violence and continue our peace. Heaven grant that it may be preserv- ed, and, if possible, without the distress of her own partly inno- cent people. But if her crimes will not allow it, if, urged by the malit^rdnt passions she has long indulged, and now heighten- eJ bj levenge, she throws ofi'all restraint, and loosens war in all its rage upon us, then, as she has shed blood like water, give her blood to drink in righteous judgaient. I know too well that we must suffer with her. Dreadful necessity only justifies the contest. I call you not, young Americans, to false glory, to spoil and triumph. You must lay dowo your lives, endure de- feat, loss, and captivity, as the varying fate of war ordains. But this must not appal you. Prepare for it with unsubmitting spirit ; renew the combat till your great enemy, like the whale of the deep, weakened with many wounds, yields himself up a prey to smaller foes, on his own element. This, by the order of Providence, has been the case before. When they possess- ed the sea in full secarity, our sailors issued out in a few small barks, mounted with the pieces dug from the rubbish of years, and scanty stores of ammunition, seized their trade, and bafiled their power. From such beginnings grew a numerous shipping that fearlessly braved them on their own coasts, and on every sea ; that brought plenty into the land, and at once armed and enriched it. What shall prevent this again ? Have our ene- mies grown stronger, or we become weaker ? Or has Heaven dropped its sceptre, and rules no more by justice and morcy ? We are now three times as many as in 1775, when we engaged them before. Our territory is greatly enlarged, and teems with new and useful products. Cotton, formerly known only to the domestic uses of a part of the people in two or three states, is now in sufficiency to supply clothing to all America, and from its lightness can be easi ly conveyed by land to every quarter. Wool, flax, and hemp, are furnished in increasing quantities pvery day. Machines for ever^ work, manqfactorica for every Lellers of William Cobbett, Esq. a» to the IS t uaefiil article, are invented and establishing continually. Large supplies of salt, sugar, and spirits are provided for in the west- ern countries, and can never be wanting on the sea coast* Lead, iron, powder, and arms, we have in abundance — parks of artillery for the field and fortifications — magazines and arsenals ready formed and id reasing — a suflicient force of disciplined troops and instructed officers to become the basis of larger armies — a number of ships of war, with men and officers train- ed and j}repare«l for naval enterprise — a people ready, in the spirit of independence, to rush against the enemy that wrongs and challenges them — a government formed, established, ope- rating all round, with every material for intelligence, d'rection and power — revenues, credit, confidence; — good will at home and abroad — ^^justice and necessity obliging, and Heaven, 5 hope, approving. It is a common opinion that our enemies are stron- ger ; but this appears an illusion from the fleets of other nations having been van({uished one by one, and left the ocean* Her strength has not increased in proportion. She indeed possesses a thousand ships of war, but no increase of people. Her com- merce is distressed, her manufactures pining, her finances sink- in,;; under irrecoverable debts, her gold and silver gone, her paper depreciating, her credit failing; depending upon other countries for food, for materials of manufacture, for supplies for her navy ; her wants increasing ; her means lessening. Every island and port she takes demands more from her, divides her force, increases her expense, adds to her cares, and multiplies her dangers. Her government is embarrassed, her people dis- tracted, her seamen unhappy, and ready to leave her every moment. The American commerce has been a slafi* of support, but will now become a sword to wound her. Instead of sup- plying, we shall take her colonies. Her West India posses- sions will be able to contribute nothing ; their labours turned to raise bread. Their trade stopped as it passes our coast ; obliged to make a further division of her forces, her European enemies will seize the opportunity to break upon her there* Ireland is in a ferment, and must be watched. The East Indies bode a hurricane. She is exposed to injury in a thousand places, and. has no strength equal to the extension. She may inflict some wounds on us, but they cannot go deep; while every blow she receives in such a crisis may go to her vitahi. She will encoun- ter us in despair ; we shall meet her with hope and alacrity. The first occasion that has presented, proved this fact ; though the sottishness of her Federal Republican attempted to prevent the volunteer offisring of our seamen to Decatur, as a proof of our inability to procure men. Had we impressed, as England does all her crews, what would it have proved by the same logic? ^ ««An Olp American," M il •m lMlff» of William Cobbett, Egq. Such) ilr, are (be lentimentt of (he people of America^ Great pains are taken by our venal writers to cause it to be be- lieved, (bat (be pemile are divided, and that Mr. Madison is in great disrepute. This, as I bad the honour to observe to you before, is no more than a continuation of the series of deceptions practised upon this nation for the last twenty years with such complete and such faltil success. If, indeed, the Americans were to say as much of Ireland, there might be some ju8tifica< tion for the assertion ; but there it* no fact to justify the asser- tion a»« applied to America, in the whole extent of which we hear not of a single instance of any person acting in defiance of the law ; no proclamations to prevent the people from meeting ; no calling out of troops to dtHpeise the people ; no barracki iNiilt in any part of the country ; no force to protect the govern- ment but simply (hat of the law, and none to defend the coantrj but a population of proprietors voluntarily bearins arms. There can be no division in America tor mpv leiii^th of time ; for, the moment there is a serious division, the government mnst gim nay i those who rule, rule solelj by the will of the people : they have no power which tliey ^\o not derive immediately from that source ; and. therefore, when the government of that country declares against us, the people declare against us in the same voice. The infinite pains which have been taken, in this country, to create a belief, that the American President has been rendered nnpopular by the publications of Mr. Smith, whom he had dioplaced, can hardly have failed to prot^ut e some effect upon the mind of your Royal Highnea?, especially as it is to be pre- •umed, that the same movers have bern at work in all the wayt at their command. I subjoin, for the perusal of your Royal Highness, an address to this Mr. Smith ; and, from it, you will perceive, that, by some of his countrymen at least, he is held in that contempt which his meanness and his impotent malice so richly merit. And, sir, I am persuaded, that his perfidy will meet with commendation in no country upon earth but this, and in this only amongst those who have always been ready- to receive, with open arms, any one guilty of treason against his country, be his character or conduct, in other respects, what it might. This person appears to have received no injury but what arose from the loss of a place which he was found unfit to fill, and from which he seems to have been removed in the gen« tlest possible manner. Yet, in revenge for this, he assaults the character of the President, he discloses every thing upon which he can force a misconstruction ; and, after all, after having said all he is able to aay of the conduct of the President, whose con- fidence he seems ^o have possessed for nearly eight years, he brings forth nothing worthy of blame, except it be the indiscre- Zetlera of ITilliam CobheH, Eif, 81 tton fn reposing that very conB«ience. The publicttion of Mr. Sinilb ia calculated to raiue Mr. Madison and the Aaierican government in the eyet of the world ; for, how pure, how !>•• froio all fault miist the government be, if a Secretary of Slate» who thuM throws open an eight years' history of the cabinet, can tell nothing more than this man, animated bv uialice exceeding that of a casttoff coquet, has been ab^o to tell I The praises which have, in our public pruits, been bestowed upon the attempte<< mischi'^f of this Mr. Smith, are by no means calculated ' > promote harmony with America, wber« both the government and the people will judge of our wishes by these praioes. This man ia notoriously the OHeray of the American government, and, therefore, he is praised here. This ia not the way to prove to the American government that we are its friends, and that it does wrong to prefer Napoleon to ui. That we ought to prefer the safety and honour of Kngland te all other things is certain ; and, if the American government aimed any blow at these, it would become our duty to destroy that government if we could. But, sir, I suspect that there are some persons in this country who hate the Ainerican government, because it suffers America to be the habitation of freedom. For this cause, # am satisfied, they would gladly, if they could, aiuiihila^e both government and people ; and, in my mind there is not the smallest doubt, that they hate Napoleon beyond all description less than they hate Mr. Jefferson or Mr. Madison. This description of persons are hostile to the exist- ence of liberty anywhere, and that, too, for reasons which everj one clearly understands. While any part of the earth remains untrodden by slaves, they are not at heart's ease. They hate the Emperor Napoleon because they fear him ; but, they hate him still more because they see in his conquests a tendency to a reforming result. They are the mortal enemies of freedom, in whatever part of the globe she may unfurl her banners. No matter what the people are who shout for freedom ; no matter of what nation or climate ; no matter what language they speak ; and, on the other hand, the enemy of freedom is invariably, by these persons, hailed as a friend. Pucb persons are naturally averse from any measures that tend to restore harmooy between this country and America, which they look upon as a rebel against their principles. What such persona would wish, is, that America should evciude not only from her ships, but also from her soil, all British subjects without distinction. This would exactly suit their tyrannical wishes. This would answer one of their great purposes. But this they never will see. No government in America would dare to attempt it. The very- proposition would, as it ought to do, bring universal execratioa down upon the head of the proposer. d8 Letters of William Colhelf, Esq. The charge against the Americans of entertaining fi partiality for the emperor of France is one well worthy of attention; because, if it were true, it would naturally have much weight with your Royal Highness. But, from the address to Mr. Smith, which I subjoin, you will perceive, that the same men in America, who complain the most loudly of Great Britain, condemn, in unqualiBed terms, the system of government exist- ing in France. And, which is of much more interest, Mr. Jefferson himself (supposed to be the great founder and encou- rager of the partiality for France) expresses the same sentiments, as appears from a letter of his, which I also subjom. With these papers before you, sir, it will, I think, be impos- sible for you to form a wrong judgment as to the real sentiments of the American government and people ; a/id I am persuaded that you will perceive, that every measure, tending to widen the breach between the two countries, can answer no purpose but that of favouring the views of France. Even the Order in Coun- cil, issueu on the 7th instant, will, I fear, have this tendency, while it cahiiiot possibly do ourselves any good. The impossi- bility of supplying the West India Islands with lumber and provisionB from our own North American provinces is notorioufi. The Order, therefore, will merely impose a tax upon the con- sumer, without shifting, in any degree worth notice, the source of the supply. And, indeed, the measure will serve to show^ rvhat we would do if we could. There is one point, relative to the intercourse between Ame- rica and England, of which I am the more desirous to speak, because I have heretofore mvgelf enterta'-ed and promulgated , ^erroneous notions respect; f. it : I a!!ude to the necessity of the former being supplied with wcv/lens by the latter. Whence this error arose, how it has been removed from my mind, and ■ what is the real state of the fact, your Royal Highness will gather from the preface (hereunto subjoined) to an American work on sheep and wool, which I, some time ago, republished, as the most likely means of effectually eradicating an error which I had contributed to render popular, and the duration of which might have been injurious to the country. This work, if I could hope that your Royal Highness would condescend to peruse it, would leave no doubt in your mind, that America DO longer stands in absolute need of English wool or woollens ; that, if another pound of wool, in any form, were never to be im- ported by her, it would be greatly to her advantage ; and, in short, that it comports with the plans of her most enlightened statesmen, not less than with her interests and the interests of humanity, that she should no longer be an importer of this for- merly necessary of life. This, air, is not one of the most trifling of the many recent revolutions in the affairs of the world - Letters of William Cobbettj Esq. 39 and it is one which, though wholly overlooked by such states- men as Lord SheflSeld, is well worthy of the serious considera- tion of your Royal Highness. There is no way in which America is now dependent upon us, or upon any other country. She has every thing wilhin herself that she need to have. Her soil produces all sorts of corn in abundance, and, of some sorts, two crops in the year upon the same ground. Wool and flax she produces with as much facility as we do. She supplies us with cotton. She has wine of her own production ; and it will not be long before she will have the oil of the olive. To attempt to bind such a country in the degrading bonds of the custom house is folly, and almost an outrage upon nature. In looking round the world ; in viewing its slavish state ; in looking at the miserable victims of European oppression, who does not exclaim : ** Thank God, she cannot so be bound !'* A policy, on our part, that would have prolonged her dependence would have been, doubtless^ more agreeable to her people, who, like all other people, love their ease, and prefer the comfort of the present day to the happiness of posterity. We might easily have caused Ameri- ca to be more commercial ; but of this our policy was afraid ; and our jealousy has rendered her an infinite service. By those measures of ours, which produced the former non-importation act, we taught her to have recourse to her own soil and her own hands for the supplying of her own wants ; and then, as no^r, we favoured the policy of Mr. Jefferson, whose views have been adopted and adhered to by his successor in the presiden- tial chair. The relative situation of th6 two countries is now wholly changed. Americano longer stands in absolute need of our manufactures. We are become a debtor rather than a creditor with her'; and, if the present non-importation act continue in force another year, the ties of commerce will be so completely cut asunder as never more to have much effect. In any case, they never can be any thing resembling what they formerly were ; and, if we are wise, our views and measures will change with the change in the state of things. We shall endeavour, by all honourable means, to keep well with America, and to attach her to us by new ties, the ties of common interest and unclashing pursuits. We shall anticipate those events which nature points out — the absolute independence of Mexico, and, perhaps, of most of the West India islands. We shall there ijivite her population to hoist the banners of freedom ; and, by that means, form a coun- terpoise to the powerof the emperor of Prance. This, at which I take but a mere glance, would be a work worthy of your Royal Highness, and would render your name great while you live, and dear to after ages. The times demand a great and far-seeing 40 LelUrs of William Cobhett, Esq. policy. This little islaiKl, cut off as she will be from all th this would have been impossible. A total destruction of the press, or the establishment of a licenser, would have prevent- ed the possibility of such delusion ; because, then, the people' would have judged from what they saw and what theyjelt ; they would have judged from the actual events of the war, and from the effects which the war, as it proceeded, produced upon themselves. Rut by the means ot the ,press, such as I have described it, hy the means of a succession of falsehoods, coming upon the h«^els of one another so quick as to leave little time for reflection, the people were hurried on from one stage to another of the war, till, at last, they saw no way of retreating ; and thousands, when they saw, in the end, the fatal consequen- ces of the measures they had been so zealous in supporting, continued, rather than acknowledge themselves dupes, the par* tisans of those by whom they had been deceived ; and so they'^ continue to this day. But, sir, amongst all the instances in which this prostituted press has abused the public ear, I know of no one where it his worked with more zeal, or more apparent effect, than with regard to the present dispute with the American liStafes. The grounds of complaint on the part of America have been sedu- lously kept out of sight ; her remonstrances, against what ntf" one can deny to be a violation of her rights, have been con-' stantly represented as demands made upon us io give up some of our rights ; her people have been represented as being on our side, and against their government ; and, last of all, when this prostituted press can no longer disguise the fact that the Americans are preparing for war against us, it represents the American legislature as well as the President as acting under the influence of France ; as being instruments in the hands of ll s , }. I. 'I ■i , ¥ tl i ! i^ i 44 Letters of William Cobbettt Esq. Buonaparte. And by these means it has drawn the public along, from stage to stage, in an approbation of the measures, which have now brought us to the eve of a new war, in addition to that which we Bnd sufficiently burdensome and calamitous, and to which there is no man who pretends to see the prospect of a termination. I have before taken the liberty to address your Royal High- ness upon this subj'ect ; and if I now repeat, in part, what I have already said, my excuse must be, that the state of things is now more likely, in my opinion, to excite attention to my observations. Under this persuasion, and in the hope of being yet able to contribute something towards the preven- tion of a war with the American States, I shall here again take a view of the whole of the question, and shall then oSer to your Boyal Highness such observations upon the subject as appear to me not to be unworthy of your attention. There are two great points upon which we are at issue 'vith America : The Orders in Council, and the Impressment ' American Seamm- The dispute with that country has late- ly .rned chiefly upon the former ; but it should be made known tc your Royal Highness, that the latter, as I once before had the Lnnour to observe to you, is the grievance that clings most '•>selv . ♦he hearts of the people, so many of whom have to weep s.f. If* f a husband, a brother, or a son, of whom they have been bereft by our impressments. (n proceeding to discuss the first of these points, I will first state to your Royal Highness how the Americans are affected by our Orders in Council. An American ship, though naviga- ted by American citizens, and laden with Indian corn, or any other produce of America, bound to any part of France, or her dominions, is, if she chance to be seen by one of our ships of war or privateers, brought into any one of our ports, and there she is condemned, ship and cargo, and the master and seamen ere sent adrift, to get back to America as they can, or to starve in our streets. The same takes place with regard to an Ame- rican vessel bound from France, or her dominions, to America. These captures take place on any part of the ocean, and they have often taken place at the very mouth of the American ports and rivers ; and, as great part of the crews of vessels so captur- ed are taken out by the captors to prevent a rescue, the sailors BO taken out are frequently kept at sea for a long while, and, in many cases, they have lost their lives during such, their deten- tion, which to them must necessarily be, in all cases, a most irksome and horrible captivity. That this is a great injury to America nobody can deny, and, therefore, the next point to consider is, whether we have any flight to intlict it upon her ; whether we have a right thus to Letters of William Cobbelt, Esq. 4#- seize the property of her merchants, and to expose to hardship, peril, and death, the persons of iier sailors. And here, sir, I have no hesitation in saying, that our conduct is wholly un- juHtifiable, according to all the hitherto known and settled rules of the neutral law of nations, even as recognised by ourselves. For never until since the year 1806, that is to say, till since the issuing of the Orders in Council, did England pretend to have a right to make prize of a neutral ship, even carrying enemy's goods to or from an enemy's port, contenting herself with seizing the car^o and suffering the ship to go free. And, as to the seizure of the goods of a neutral, on board a neutral ship, the very attempt to set up the pretension of a right to do that would have marked out the author as a madman. Indeed, such a pretension puts an end to all idea of neutrality ; it at once involves every maritime nation in every war that shall exist between any other maritime nations ; and is, therefore, a pre- tension so tyrannical in its principle, and so desolating in its consequences, as to be abhorred by all but those who delight m the troubles and miseries of mankind, and the waste of human life. ■ Conscious that general usage and reason are against us, we ground our justification upon a rule of war, whicli says that one belligerent may retaliate upon another. It is not, for instance, held to be right, to kill prisoners made in war ; but, if our ene* my kill the prisoners he takes from us, we may, according to this rule, kill the prisoners we take from him ; though, even in that case, not exceeding the n mber that he has killed belong- ing to us. No rule of retaliation could apply to the case before us. We were not at war with America. She had seized no ships belonging to England. She had not been guilty, and she was not charged with being guilty, of any breach of the laws of neutrality. But, if she had been guilty of no offence, France had, and the retaliation was to fall upon America. This leads me to solicit the patient attention of your Royal Highness to the History of the Orders in Council, which Or- ders we have always called retaliatory measures. The Empe- ror Napoleon issued two Decrees, the first from Berlin, and the second from Milan. These Decrees were levelled against the trade carried on between neutrals and England, or, rather, between America and England, America being, in fact, the only neutral then left. The Decrees were a gross violation of the neutral rights of America. Napoleon had not, indeed, the power of enforcing thera ; but he would have done it if he could ; and the very attempt, the very existence of the De- crees, was a violation of the heretofore acknowledged rights of neutrals. Such was the conduct of Napoleon. We issued what we called Orders in Council, the nature and eflfect of ^: m 1 46 Letters of William Cohbettt Esq. I, t which I have above described. We have contended, fhat fhese Orders were in the way of retaliation for the French Decrees. This the Americana have always treated as an outrage on every principle of justice. They have, as well they might, denied that we have a right to act with injustice towards ihem, upon the pretence, true or false, that another power has acted with injustioe towards them. They have S(ofled at such a princi* pie of action; but they bare, at the same time, observed, that, even if this monstrous principle were admitted, we should hnd 11) it no justification of our Orders, the commencement of which they trace to a date prior to that of the frst of A'opo- hotis Decrees. The first of this series of measures, of which America complains, was adopted by our government, and that, too, iknder the administration of those who are now OUT. It was a blockade of the entrances of the Ems, the Weser, the Elbe, and the Trave, in consequence of Me Icing of Prussia having taken possession of various parts of the Electorate of Hanover^ and having, as waH asserted in Mr. Fox's letter, done other things injurious to English commerce. Thus this dispute with America grew, in part at leaitt, out of the connexion With Hanover. This regulation, against which the Americans irn- DK^diately protested as being a gross viohition of their neutral rights, was dated on the 8th of April, 1 H06. Before the month «f November in that year. Napoleon had put an end to all dis« putes between us and the king of Prussia, by attacking, defeat- ing, and overthrowing the king of Prussia, and taking posses- sion of Prussia itself as well a* Hunover. Being at Berlin, he, on the 21st of November, 1806, issued that Decree before spoken of. called the Berlin Decree This measure he called a measure of retaliation for our regulations against neutrals. We followed him with more restrictions upon neutrals, or, rather, upon America, under the form of Orders in Council, and these We declared to be measures of retaliation for tfie Berlin Decree. Then came Napoleon with his Decree from Milan, as a refali' atton for these Orders. And we have followed him with Or- der upon Order since that time, calling them measures of leta- liation. America complained of both the belligerents, and was told by each that he had been compelled to deviate from the law of nations in his own defence, and that he only wished to reduce his adversary to the necessity of returning to an observance of the rules of that law. We, more especially, expressed our .sor- row at being obliged to give annoyance to neutral commerce ; and we said, we were so anxious to see this obligation at an end, that we would waive the point of pnonVy of violation, and would repeal our Orders, step by step, with the repeal ofthe Freach De* : i It Jjelters of William CobhetU Esq, # creeg; that is to say, that whenever Napoleon was ready (9 lur SOT' merce ; an end, would chDe- begin the work of repealing, we would begin too, and keep pace with hiin, until the whole masa of obnoxious l)t:crees ap our sai- ;r8, yes, , " your »he says, ors ; and >ir being I brought in any of to abide ips upon rivers,) (1 where witness, now the :er judge e ' sail, and that a are to t le griev- :essarily number corres- :hildren, try cries It be the Ike this; Iwill see id, who «rc wsing their utmost endeavours to persuade the public, that the American Congress are, in their resent In! language agaiiiit England, " stimulated by the intrigms of BiionKparte." As if the intrigues of Buonaparte were neresaury to make an assem* biy of real representatives of the American people feel for tht ruin of so many hundreds of their merchants, and for the great- er ButTerings ' of so many thousands of their seamen and of the relations of those seamen ! As if the intrigues of Buonaparte were necessary to make such an assembly feel at seeing their country, whose independence was purchased with the blood of their fathers, treated, at sea, as if it were still no more than a co- lony 1 As if to feel acutely, and to express themselves strongly upon such an occasion, it were necessary for them to be insti- gated by the intrigues of a foreign power! Having now, with as much clearness as I have been able to comUiue with brevity, submitted to your Royal Highness tht nature and extent of the complaints which America prefers against England, I next proceed to state to you what has been done by the Congress, in the way of obtaining redress for those grievances ; after which will naturally come such observatiooi as I think not unworthy of your serious attention, relative to the consequences of a war with a country which, until this moment, the prostituted press of this country has studiously treated with contempt, ' It is necessary to begin here by observing on the meant which this press has, on this subject, made use of to deceive the public. The writers to whose labours I allude, were employ- ed during the last spring and summer in representing Mr .Mar dison as a falling character : they told us that Mr. Smith's disclosures had ruined the reputation of the former ; they ex- pressed their opinion that he would never more show his face in the Congress ; and the people of America they represented as beuig decidedly against a war with England. So that the public here were led to believe, that, let our ministers do what they might with regard to America, there was no danger to be apprehended. I took the liberty, many months ago, to endea- vour to guard your Royal Highness against the adoption of opinions founded upon such statements ; and*I then expressed to you my firm conviction, that an immediate change of con- duct on our part, towards America, was necessary to prevent a war with that country. When the President's speech reached us, breathing a spirit of resentment, and suggesting the propri- ety of arming, these yelpers of the venal press, as if all set on by one and the same halloo, and as if forgetting their predic- tions about his fall, flew at him in a strain of abuse such as I h&ve seldom witnessed, except when I myself have had the ho- nour to be thought by their setters on an object worthy of then* J .... ! ■:■' m^ *> If' I I ! I' 4P Lelters of Willinm Cobhelt, Esq, ^l\ mercenary malice. They likened the style of his npeech td that of the Wabash anit Shatraneae Siivages; they called hitn a tool of Buonaparte ; they represented him as a mean, loir- minded, ignorant man ; and 1 have never beard that any one of them has been called to account for this conduct. They loon found, however, what every man of sense anticipated, that the sentiments of the President's speech were but a faint sketch of the picture to be finished by the Congress, who, therefore, next became an object of attack. But, by degrees, as the accounts of the proceedings of th Con* gresB have reached us, these deceivers of the Englisl ,)le have grown more measured in their abuse. At the arrival of every new menace from the city of Washington, they have, as is in the nature of the true-bred bully, become more and more gentle ; till, at last, they have softened down into a tone of ci- vility. They do not " now make a mockery" oP war with America ; they even hope that it may be prevented ; aid they *' trust empty punctilio will not stand in the way of reconcili* ation ;" that very reconciliation which they had done all in their power to prevent. But, still sticking to their character of deceivers, they are now employed in garbling the debates in the Congress. They are employed in suppressing the sentiments of those members who are advocates for a resistance of England, and in puffing forth the speeches of those who are on the opposite side. The speech of one gentleman in particular, Mr. Randolf hey praise beyond bounds, for which, however, they } ne reason, which they do not avow; and, which, as it is somewhat curious, I will, even at the expense of a digression, make a sub- ject of remark* In reading the speech of this gentleman, as copied into some of our newspapers, I could not help wondering that a thing so incoherent and so weak should nave called forth the praises even of these prints. I wondered that even the> should de> cribe such at once wild and vapid matter as ** full of acutmess and sarcasm.^* I had, indeed, frequently heard them bestow encomiums on the speeches of Lord Liverpool and Mr. Perce* val ; but any thing so inappropriate as this I hkd neVer heard them hazard before. When, however, I came to see the speech itself, in the American newspapers, and found that / myself had been an object of Mr. Randolph's attack, the wonder ceased. It was no longer a matter of surprise, that the mercenary tribe kud discovered in the speech of Mr. Randolph every thing characteristic of acuteness, and profundity, and public spirit. But, really, it was dealing very unfairly with their readers not to treat them to a participation in the enjoyment of these sarcas- tic passages, especially when they would not thereby have di- lUJoisheU their own ; and it is aot a little surprising, that they i Letters of William Cobbett, Esq* M Bbould, in copying the speech of (heir champion, have taken the puinH to exchide precisely these paHsages. Since, hotreveri they huve done it, I will 611 up the gap. Mr. IIanuulph bad, it seeuis, been accused of not being a republican, and of being devoted to England ; in the way of aiiHwer to which he makes the following personal remarks and allusions. '* 1 du not like this republicanism which is support- by Mr. Adams on this side the Atlantic, and by Cobbet on the other, who, if he could break jail, would assist in revolu- tionizing New England. Republicanism of John Adams, and William Cubbelt, par nobilefralrum, united now as in 1798* Formerly, Mr. Adams and Porcupine would have called me a Frenchman ; now, if worthy of notice, both would call mean EngUsliman From whom,*' says he, in another part of h\^ speech, *' come these charges ? From men escaping from jttila in Europe, and here teaching our fathers and sons their political duties." Now, in the first place, 1 have great satisfac- tion in learning from such unquestionable authority that I agree in political opinions with Mr. Adams. Mr. Adams was one of those who, at the earliest date, made a conspicuous figure ia the cause of no taxation without representation ; he was Ame- rican minister at the Hague, afterwards at Paris, afterwards in England ; he was Vice President of the F lited States all the time that General Washington was Pres .ent ; he was after' wards himself President of the United States : and having been, at the next election, supplanted by Mr. Jefferson, he has, since his retirement, had the rare virtue to acknowledge, upon further reflection, thai the system of his succecsor was the most ad- vantageous to his country ; and, upon that ground, to give that system all the support in his power. He lives now in the simplest style, at the age of about seventy-five, in his native state of Massachusetts, beloved and venerated by all around him, and without having, or being suspected of having, added to his own private means a single dollar of the public money. Such is the man whose opinions I am now charged with holding, and in company with whom I am said to have changed my for- mer opinions as to American politics ; upon which I can only say that no effort of mine shall be wanting to render myself worthy of such an honour. As to what Mr. Randolph says about my being in jail, that is a mode of answering which he must have learnt from our mercenary prints. That is the way that they.answer my arguments. But this gentleman's general accusation against those tvho liave been in jails in Europe ; big objection to their teaching politics to the people of America; these are worthy of some attention. For the present, laying my own case out of the question, I would, if I were within his hearing, ask this gentleman how long it is since the bare cir- »;■■; j'li If L?*« -n ■..mis^' aii jLdiers of William Cohbdt, Esq* comsfance of having been imprisoned in a jail has been loofted iipoD as sufficient to disqualify a man lor teaching political du- ties. It seems (o me, on the contrary ^ that the circumHtunce ought, if such man has suffered on account of his politics, to be considered as one qualification at least, seeing that it must ne* eessarily have impressed strongly upon his mind the nature and effect of the political institution under which he has sufl'ered. But, surely, Mr. Randolph cannot have been serious ; tor he boasts of being descended from the country of Hampden and Sidney, and of having imbibed his political principles from them. Indeed I Why then he should have recollected, that the for- mer, if he had not, in a glorious fight for the liberties of Eng- land, died in the field, would have perished on the scaffold ; and» that the latter, after having, lor a long while, inhabited a jail, did actually lose his life under the hands of the executioner. And if the brave Sidney, who was found guilty by a packed jury, and who, when condemned by a corrupt judge, stretched out his arm to him and bade him feel his pulse to see it he trembled ; if this undaunted advocate of freedom had escaped before f he day of execution, and arrived in America . would Mr. Randolph, had he been then living, have objected to him as a teacher of political duties merely on the ground of his havinj^ escaped from a jail? And Pri/nn, who was persecuted by the then attorney general of England, and who, by the tyrannical judges of that day, those base instruments of a corrupted court; if he, who was imprisoned, and fined, and pilloried, ami mutiiated» almost beyond mortal endurance, and who, after all, lived to bring one of his judges to the block; if Prynn, who was (riu« punished on a charge of seditious libel, had *' broke jail,*' this tery jail of Newgutef where he was at first confiqed ; if he had " broke jail," and gone to America, would Mr. Randolph's forefathers, of whom he boasts, have objected to such a teach- er of political duties? Why, though, perhaps, Mr. Randolph does not know it, William Penn was prosecuted for seditious libel, and WdS confined in this very jail of Newgate toe, though his time here was rendered short by a jury who had the seuse to know their duty, and the courage to resist the browbeating of a corrupt political judge ; and was William Penn thought an unfit teacher of political duties ? 1 am piea sure adopted, or proposed to be adopted, by the Congress, is of a very dangerous tendency, especially when we consider how large a portion of Americans and other foreigners we have on board of our ships. These measures are not, sir, to be considered as the mea- sures of a faction, whose object, in getting the nttion into a war, is to create the means of fattening themselves, and their families, and dependants, and supporters ; they are the mea- sures of the people of America, apeakmg through the lips of their real representatives, unbribed themselves, and chosen without the aid of bribery ; and they arise out of the grounds of complaint against us, which I before had the honour to lay before your Royal Highness. The pro^itituted press of liondon has, for many months past, been endeavouring 1 I ! 1 'I iji '1 ■ ■ se Ldters of William Cohhettt E»q> to make its deluded readers believe, that (he partisans of' iEngland, in America, were the most numerous ; and that, if the government engaged in war against us, the people would turn against it, and that a separation of the States would take place. I endeavoured to guard the public, an^ your Roy* al Highness, against these delusive statements ; and we now sec Chat, thi>ugb there are two parties in America, both parties hav9 united against us, with as much cordiality as the two parties is our House of Commons united against Mr. Madock'a motion of the 1 1th of May, 1K09, for an inquiry into the sale of seats is that honourable house, and, surely, an union mure cordial than that has seldom been heard of between opponents of any de- scription. Those members of the congress who have voted against the war with England are so few, and those who have Bpoken against it, are, for the most part, so notoriously contemp- tible, that the measure may be regarded as having been adopt* ed without opposition. The Congress has not been long electa •d ; they have just received the instrttctiona of their constitu- ents; and it will not be long before those constituents will agaia liave an opportunity of deciding upon their merits or demerits. None of those members hold officer of any sort ; none of them bave pensions or sinecures, and none of them can touch, in any w^iiy, a farthing of the money which may be expended in con» sequence of their votes for the creation of any office. This being the case, the voice of the Congress must be the voi4:e of the nation; and it would be delusion unexampled to believe that the people of America are not entering heartily into this war. Our prostituted press, unable any longer to keep up the de- lusi nisters in their adherence to the Orders in Council, can hardly fail to have awakened in the mind of your Royal Highness a re* collection of these my efforts, which, to the misfortune of the country, appear to have been despised by your late minister and his colleagues. Now, however, those great teachers, Expe- rience and Adversity, seem to have commanded attention ; and, in consequence of a motion of Mr. Brougham, at the close of an investigation brought forward by that gentleman, and conducted by him to the close, with spirit, perseverance, and abdity which do him infinite honour, and which have received, as they merit, that highest of honours, the thanks and applause of all the sensible and public-spirited purl of the nation ; in consequence of this motion, madeonthe 16th instant, the rainistrv appear to have yielded rather than put the question to the vote, and tn have agreed that the Orders in Council, as far as objected to by America, should be annulled. Here, then, sir, is an occasion for you to pause and to re^ fleet. And, the first thing to ask is, what new grounds presoent themselves for the annulling of these orders. There are none. They stand upon precisely the same footing that they have stood on ever since the month of November, lUlO, when your ministers were, by the American government, called upon to annul them in imitation of the revocation of the decrees of Ber- lin and Milan. I backed the application of the American mi- nister ; I told your ministers that the sooner they repealed the orders the better ; I foresaw that war must, at last, be the con- sequence of their persisting in a refusal ; I urged them to do what they ought to do of their own accord, and not to wait till they should be compelled to do it. But, sir, your minister, that minister for whose puhlic services we, the people of England, are now to pay 50,U00^ down, and 3,000/. per annum ; that minister, to whose memory we are now to erect a monument ; that minister persisted in his refusal, and tauntingly set America at defiance ; the best, and, indeed, the only excuse, for which, is, to suppose him profoundly ignorant of the temper and the means of America, and of the interests of England in respect to her transatlantic connexions. America, whose government is very properly obliged to consult the wisheu of the people at large, was slow in her move- ments towards measures of hostility. Like a truly wise man, the President not only used all the means in his power to Letters of William Cobbett, Esq, •» avoid the extremity of war ; but he also took care to prove to the woriil that he hud done bo. At last, however, the Con< gress began to make preparations fgr war, be)i;inning with fulljr •X|)laining to the people the grounds of their so doing. From one step (hey proceeded tu another, and, at every step, their proceedings became more and more a subject of mockery with all those who, in England, take to themselves (he exclusive ap- pellation of loyal men and/ri«nd8 of government. It was in ttiiHs(a^eonhc occurrences, on the IstofFebmary last, just after (he arrival of the report of the committee of Foreign Relations to the lower house of Congress, that I thought it my duty to address a fourth letter to your Koyai Highness, the chief object of which was to exhort you not to believe the representations of the hired press, which was hard at work to incidca(e a belief, that (he report in question, and all the warlike steps taken by the Congress, were mere empty noise ; mere boasting and bullying ; that all would end in smoke, and that our ministers might adhere to their Orders in Council with |ierfec( safety. I occupied no less than four pages in my earnest ende-^'ours to impress upon the mind of your Royal Highness a distrust of this hired, this base, this prostituted press, which, while it was vilifying the President and the Con- gress, while it wa«i calling them tools in the hands of France, was telling the people of England, that a war with America would be felt by them no more " than a war with the rocks of Scilly." Many were the prints that laboured to these ends; but (he print pre-eminent in this, as in almost every other im- position on the public, was the Timkb, the prostituted columns of which has, within these two years, done England more mis- chief than those of all the other prints put together. What will be said by these prints, now that they see the Orders in Council annulled even before America has struck a blow, is more a matter of curiosity than of concern ; but it must, with your Royal Highness, be a subject of deep sorrovr and mortificatiim to see your ministers now lowering their tone, taking a cowering attitude, without any new reason being afford- ed in the conduct of either France or America, and before the ink is hardly dry of that DECLARATION, wherein you were advised to proclaim to the whole world, that you would not annul the Orders in Council, till France had, by a distinct aiitt suleinn act, made an unqualified revocation of her decrees. France, so far from doing this, has, in the most distinct manner, proclaimed the contrary ; and yet, our Orders are, or are to be, aniiuiled ! After all the bold talk of your ministers; after all the j)ledjj;e3 of perseverance that they have put in your mouth ; after all their contemptuous defiance of America, here we are doing the very act which we might have done nearly two year^ i ■■:t m : -I. ■ •. ii ■ "J ; 'r "•J ■ ■ 1 64 Letters of William Cobbett, Eaq. I » ago, and might thereby have prevented much of the misery, and all the melancholy consequences of that misery, in the cen* tral counties uf England ! That we Hhould be forced to adopt this measure, or to sus- tain a war with America, might have been foreseen, and ought to have been foreseen, by your ministers from the beginning. I am warranted in asserting this, because I foresaw and fore> told it ; but, so long ugo as the month of January lattt, it l)e> came so evident to ine, that J could not refrain from reiterating a positive assurance that it would and must be the case. At the time to nhicli I here refer, >'our minister, that minister to whose memory we are now to erect - ditio»8, of which the half-horned Courier is bo sillv as to talk. It n'ill mortify somepeople, hut it mill be done. It will make those Jacobins and Levellers in America lat;{^h, and Mr. Ma- dison more, perhaps, than any body else ; but I say it will be done, Bonaparte will laugh too ; but it will be done; and, perbape, the least mortifying circumstance will not be, that it is what I recommended fifteen months w^o. How much Hatter would it have been, IF IT HAD BEEN DONE THEN, How much better in every respect ; and especially how much better for our character ! However, better late than never; on- ly, when it is done, I hope it will be done with as good a grace as possible, and that after thai, the venal prints in London will never more foretell the donnfal of Mr. Mudisont and will see the folly of venting their spleen, in words, against those who are beyond our reach ; of showing the teeth where one cannot bite." These passages, sir. were published on the 1 8/A of January last ; so that it would seem, that though shut up in one of *< His Majesty's Jails," I knew what was doing in the world better than " His Majesty's Ministers" did. " How much better would it have been, if it had been done then." These were my words five months ago, sir; and, therefore, they apply with the more force now. " How much better would it have been, if it had been done then /" How much better would it have been, Mmy opinion had been acted upon ; if vay advice, so urgently and so respectfully tendered to your Royal Highness, had been followed ! What national shame, what humiliation, what misery, what melancholy scenes, would have been avoided ! There can, I think, be no doubt in the mind of your Royal Highness, that the troubles which we have wit- nessed in the manufacturing counties have arisen chiefly from, the want of employment amongst the manufacturers, which, lowering the wages at the same time that corn was rising in price, has, in the end, produced all the scenes of misery, aJl the acts of violence, and the melancholy fate of so many of our countrymen. There can, I think, be no doubt, that the per- severance in the Orders in Council, and certain other parts of our maritime system connected with them, have been the chief cause of all these calamities ; and, when we behold the suffer- ings of the people, as proved before the House of Commons ; when we see the soldiers stationed to protect the judges in the courts of justice ; when we see the soldiers employed (as is •tated in the public prints) to guard the sheriff and his afficers ■■II •^liii* If* [ m It i M i I jfij Letters of William DobhsS, Eaqk in the pcrrortnance of their awful duty of executing the men at Cbeyter; w*ien we are now told of thirty-eight men being just committed in a body to Lancaster jail, out of which, eight peraon» have jU8t been taken to be hanged, amongst which eight, one !» stated to have been a woman, " Hannah Smith, for committing a highwai/ robbenj, by STEALING POTATOES at Bank Top, in the town of Manchester :'* when we behold all these things, sir, and scores of others that might be added to the lis), and when we reflect, that they might all have been prevent- $d if my advice iMd been followed a year and a half ago; when we thus reflect, and when we see that we have to pay 50,000{. down, and 3,0002. to the family, and have further ta be taxed to pay for a monument in honour of the minister who rejected this advice, what must be the feelings of the people T Even in December last, when the corporation of the city of London, upon the motion of Mr. Aldermfaht Wood, prayed your Royal Highness to take measures for " re-opening the usual channels of intercourse with neutral nations ;" if, even then, the Orders in Council had been annulled, the greatest part of the calamities above -mentioned might have been pre- vented. But your ministers, with the iiate Mr. Perceval at their head, advised your Royal Highness to reject this part of the prayer of the city of London, and to tell them, that *' no- tiling should be wanting on your part to contribute towards the restoration of commercial intercourse between this country and other nations to the footing on which it had been usually con- ductedy even in the midst of war" This, sir, was only repeating what your ministers h? ' before said ; but, sir, you have not been able to do this. Yv«u have not been able to make the emperor of France relax ia the smallest degree. His con- tinenUu system remains in full vigour ; and so it will remain,. ]ained of. Scarcely any body could be prevailed upon to be- ieve this ; but it is come true, it seems, after all. The anti- jacobioB will not believe me ; they despise my warnings ; and they pay for it in the end. Not only the public, but the go- vernment, in England, wholly disbelieved that the Americans would go to war. The truth is, that there are so many news- papers in England whose sole purpose is to deceive the pub- lic, that the wonder is that any truth at all ever gains general belief. There has, hoK'ever, been an extraordinary degree of obstinacy as to the real intention of America with regard to war. Nothing could induce people to believe that she would go to war. I asserted and proved, as I thought, that it was natural- ly to be expected that she would go to war, unless we did away the orders in council, and also the impressment of American seamen ; but scarcely a soul would believe. Perhaps it may be good for the cause of freedom that 1 was not believed ! But let US now quit the past, and look a little to the future. What will take place now ? The letter, or pretended letter, from Liverpool, under the date of the 1 Uth inslant, would make this cheated nation believe, that the moment the news arrives of the Leliera of ft^illiam Cohhtll, Esq. 69 repealof the orders in council, the quarrel wilh America will be at an end. It will be beet, however, to let the letter speak for itself • " I have to advise you, that a pilot boat is arrived here to-day from New- York, which she left on the 23d olt., bringing an account that the senate, after deliberating seven days, had come to the resolution of declaring war against Great Britain, 19 to 13. An express had arrived at New- York to major BloomBeld, which he read at the head of his army, for- mally announcing that the United States had declared war against Great Britain. I think it proper to add, however, that the houses in New- York which despatched (he pilot boat vith this information, for the purpose of making speculations in produce, expressly ordered, that should the orders in council be revoked, their friends here were on no account to make any purchases for them. This is a convincing proof that this de- claration of war will be short-lived, and on the arrival of the Gazette, containing the revocation of the orders in council, all matters in dispute between (he two countries will be amicably settled. The Mackerel schooner had been despatched from New- York by Mr. Foster, direct to Falmouth, the day before the pilot boat sailed. When the senate came to the resolution of declaring war, the account of Mr. Perceval's death had not reached Washington, tat was known at New-York." Thus a new falsehood is to be set on foot. We are now to believe that the declaration of war is to have no effect. Till now it has been asserted, distinctly asserted, that the senate had rejected the proposition for war. This, as the reader well knows, has been sta- ted most distinctly, with all the circumstances attending the fact. It was not only asserted that the senate had rejected the pro- position, but the number of the majority against the motion was given to this deceived, this cheated, this insulted nation. In the Courier newspaper of the I7th inst. was published the following paragraph : " We stop the press to state, that we have just learned, that on a motion made in the house of repre8enta(ives for declaring war against Great Britain, the question was carried by a large majority ; but, on being brought up to (he senate, it was rejected by a majority of two." This was published on the 1 9(h of July, and on the 20th the above letter from Liverpool. Now, upon what authority was the first statement made ? Clearly upon no authority at all. It was a fiilsehood ; a falsehood intended to deceive the people of England ; a falsehood intended to answer most base, and yet most foolish purposes ; for, on the 20tb, out comes the truth by sheer force. I have heard a gentleman say that he verily believed, that if the French wore at Dover, lialf a million strong, these same newspapers would represent vNapoleon as at the last gasp. I hardly believe that ; fi»r, by m JLetterg of William Cobbetif Msq. the time he was safely landed, they would be con&ider?tig of titt means of going over to hh side, and would, in their own mindsi be settling as to their price. But, short of a crisis like that, there is nothing that will induce them to desist from peraeve' ring in falsehood to the very moment of detection : to the very moment ! They know well, that a few weeks, days, dr hours, must expose their falsehoods to the puhiic ; but thejf know, also, that for those weeks, days, or hours, the falsehoods answer their purposes. And when one falsehood is worn out« - they hav« another. Thus it is that this nation is deceived ; it is thus that it is more deceived than any oMier nation upon earth ; and that, at last, when a calamity comes upon it, it seems to be thunderstruck at what all the rest of the world clearly foresaw. It is thus, too, more than by any other means, that the country has been brought into its present hum,- ibied and distressed state. The people have always been be> lieving pretty nearly the contrary of the truth while the event iras coming. The result has, in almost every case, been pre* cisely the opposite of what was expected ; and the world have thought the people of Bngiand mad for their silly expectations ; but if the world knew the means that are used to make the \ people of England believe falsehoods instead of truth ; if the world knew that the people of England, dtulng the pifogress of any expedition, or other warlike undertaking, for instance, hear nothing but falsehoods respecting it, the world would not be sur^ prised at the disappointment of the people of England at the result These observations apply with peculiar force to thtf dispute with America, who has been represented to the people of England as being, even now, wholly incapable of going to war, «nd whose government has been represented as acting contrary to the sense of the people in all its acts of resistance against £ngland. Now, howev«r, we are at war, if the above news be true ; and even now new falsehoods are attempted to be palmed 4ipon us. But does the reader not perceive, that if America has declared war, she is at war ? And that if she is at war, ther& must be a treaty before there can be a peace ? To make a treaty of peace will require some months, at any rate ; and does the reader suppose that the Americans, after the ex* pense of arming has been encountei'ed, will disarm till she has obtained satisfaction upon all the points at issue ? The acts of aggression (as she considers them) on our part are many ; and does the reader suppose that the mere news of the repeal of tka orders in council will satisfy her ? Besioc'<, \f there were no cause of disagreement but that of the orders in council, dees not the reader perceive that the repeal has not been full, and complete, and unqualified ; and that if it were so, America cannot bo expected to disarm without some sort of compcufa- l4eUers of tfilliam Cohbetl, Bij, n tlon ? What ! is our government to commit upon the Ameri' cans whatever acts of aggression it pleases ; and, after that, when America arms, and declares war, are we to suppose, that' to effect an instant peace, we have nothing to do but to put ft atop to our aggressions ? I do not take upon me to assert that they are aggressions ; but supposing them to be such, as I realljr think they are, does the reader suppose that our governments possesses a license to commit acts of aggression, and to put for<* ward its mere cessation of them as a ground for peace with thft offended party ? This is not the way with our government/ either abroad or at home. i It is always talking of " indemnity for the past, and security^ for the future;" and why are we to suppose that the American government will not talk in the same way ? If a man offend our government, does it say " cease to otTetid us, and there is an end of the matter !" No: this is not the language it is now mak- ing use of to the people in the Luddite counties. It punishev them, when it can catch them : and shall it lay down as a maximi^ that it is never to be made responsible for what it does ! The reader may be assured that the Americans do not consider it as exempted from the usual laws and principles by which nations regulate their conduct towards each other : and he may be fur^ ther assured, that the inquiries relative to the state of our ma- Butacturers will not, when read in America, tend to lower her tone. She is now armed ; she has got over her great reluctance to enlist soldiers and to fit out armed vessels ; and she will never lay down her arms, that is to say, she will never make peace with us, until we agree to make her ample compensation for her losses and injuries under the orders in council, and also agree to desist from impressing any persons on board her ships at sea. Are we prepared for this ? Are the associates of Perceval ready to give up these points ? Are they ready to pay for what has been captured under regulations which the Americans regard as a violation of their rights ; and are they ready to make it a crime in any English officer to seize seamen on board American ships at sea ? If they are, we shall certainly soon be at peace with Americ)> ; if they are not, my opinion is, we shall have war with her till these points are given up. The close of the pretended letter from Liverpool is curious. It observes, that " when the senate came to a resolution of declaring war, the account of Mr. Perceval's death had not reached Washington.'* As much as to say, if the news of his death had reached Washington, war might not have been declared ! And this is the way in which the friends of the little dead lawyer speak of him, is it 1 They leave us clearly to infer, that the news of his death, the bare news of his death, might have prevented a war with America! And yet have these same writers the impudence to call the people of J' 11 '•iffi w JUeHers of William CohhiiU Esq. Nottinghftm and other places, monstera, because thej expressed theiir joy upon receiving the same news ! In conclusion. I beg the reader to bear in mind that I have been nearly two years endeayouring to prevent a war with America ; that very sooo after I was sentenced to be imprisoned two years in Newgate* and to pay a thousand pounds to the king, for writing about the flogging of English local militia men at the town of Ely, and about the employing of German troops upon that occasion; I beg the reader to bear in mind, that, very soon after that impri« Honment commenced, I began my most earnest endeavours to prevent this war, the most fatal 1 fear of all the many wars in which we have been engaged, since the present king mounted the throne. I was enabled to tell pretty exactly what would €ome to pass, unless we redressed the grievances of America without delay. I bad letters from America, written by persons of a little more understanding than appears to be possessed by those from whom our lawyers get their information* 1 did not know to what extent the merchants of America might submit to have their property seized ; but I was well assured, that the American people would no longer suffer their seamen to be in> pressed upon the open sea. This I was positively told uearljf^t two years ago ; and I am now particularly anxious to impress ' h upon the minds of the ministers; for they may be assured, that the American government, if it has actually declared war, will never make peace till that point is settled to the satisfaction of the American people ; till, in shwt, we agree to desist wholly from taking any person whatever out of an Ameiican ship at sea. I am aware how stinging it will be to some persons in England to yield one jot to America. I am ^ware how mucli;,. more they hate her government than they hate that of France.^^ I am aware how glad they would be to hear of the United StateSi^ bein§ swallowed up by an earthquake. Not so, however, the> people of England generally, who do not grudge any thing that IS yielded to America so much as they do what is yielded to »ther powers. They do not, besides, see very clearly the advantage they are to derive from the keeping down of the Americans by the means of the English navy. They do not see the benefit that is likely to accrue to them frora any thing,' the tendency of which is to press upon a free people in another country. Nothing, I am convinced, m\\ ever make an Ameri- can war popular in England. Wai. C0B8BTT. ^tler, July 23d, 1812. ^ « > Laters •f fFilliam Cohbetl, Esq, 73 TO THE PRINCB REQENT, Str, If I kare now to refer to the proofs of tfae correctness of those opinions which I addressed to your Royal Highness many months past, upon the subject of the dispute with America, I beg you to be assured, that I do it not in the way of triumpt^ but in the hope, that even yet my advice, most respectfttiiy offered to your Royal Highness, may have some weight wiHi you, and may, in some small degree, tend to avert that last of national evils, a war with America, a war against the chil- dren of Englishmen, a war against the seat of political and re- ligious freedom. ]n my former letters i took great pains to endeavour to la< ^uce your Royal Highness to distrust the statements in oar public prints as to the power of the English party in the Ame- rican states. I assured you, that the venal press 'in Eoglandl was engaged in promulgating a series of deceptions with regard to the opinions of the people of America. I took the liberty^ to point out to your R<»yal Highness the mischieft which must result from listening to the advice of those whose language might correspond with that of this press ; and, in short, I showec^ that if the endeavours of that pernieious, partial, and corrupt press had their intended effect, war with America must be the consequence. Sy tbis press (the vMest instrument of the vilest cojiruption that ever existed in the whole world) the people cC £dgland were induced to approve of the measures which have now produced a war with America ; or, at least, they were in- duced to wink at them. They were made to believe, that our measures of hostility against America were useful to ue, and that the American government had not the power to resent then by war; The same, I doubt not, was told to your Royal Highness verbally ; but how wretchedly have the nation and yod been deceived} The state of affairs between the two countries now standi thus : There exists a dispute on the subject of our Orderg in Council^ on that of the Impressment (y American seamen, and on the possession of the Ploridas, There are some other matters of inferior importance, but they would admit of easy^ arrangement. With regard to the Orders in Coundl, your Royal Highness was advised to issue, on the 2 1st of April last, a declaration, stating that you would not repeal the Or- ders in Council until France, officially and unconditionally, by «ome public promulgation, repealed her Berlin and Milan De- crees. France, so far from doing this, has, ia the aiost public ■y' i :4 ■k-% '1 u tetters qf William (Johheitt Esq, and solemn manner, declared, that ehe will never do what your declaration required, though, at the same time, she has re- peated (and she has done no more) what she had said to the American government in liilO, and what was (hen communi' cated to our government by the American minister in Londpn. Nevertheless, you were afterwards advised- to repeal the Orders in Council, though the renditions of the declaration before issued were not at all satisfied, but were, in fact, set at open defiance* This repeal, which took place on the 23d of June last, was, however, too late in its adoption to prevent war. The Ameri* can government, who bad been making their preparations for many months, ^nd which preparations had been the subject of mockery with the venal press in England, declared war on the 18th of June last. The intelligence of this having been re- ceived in ]Sngland, your Royal Highness was advised to issue, pn tlie 31&t of Jiily, an Order in Council for an embargo on all American vessels in our ports, and also for capturing and de* taining all American vessels at sea. This is the state of affairs between the two countries ; and the main question now appears to be, whether, when the American government hears of our repeal of the Orders in Conncil, they yivW revoke their declaration of war. .This is a question of great interest at this moment ; and I shall, therefore, proceed to lay befo|:e your Royal Highness my sentiments with respect to it. The same sort of infatuation that has prevailed here, witjh regard to American affairs, for many months past, appears still to prevail. Indeed, sir, 1 can call it no other than hisolente ; an insolent contempt of the Americans, taught by those who hate them, and who would if they could, kill them to the last man, in revenge for their having established a free government, where there are neither sinecures, jobs, or selling of seats* This insolence has induced people to talk of America as a country incapable of resenting any thing that we might du to her ; as being a wretched state, unsupported by any thing like vigonr in government ; as a sort of horde of half savages, with whom we might do what we pleased ; and, to the very last minute, the great mass of the people here, ninety>niue out of every hun- dred, firmly believed, that America would neper go to war with us. They left provocation quite out of the question. They •appeared to have got into their heads a conclusion, that let ua do what we would to America, she would not go to war with us. This way of thinking has pervaded the whole of the wri^ tings upon the subject of the dispute with America. At every eta^e in the, progress towards war, the corrupt press has assert- ed} tliat 4^merica knfw better than to go to ^ar with us. When LeUera of William Cobbdt, Ekq. 78 the Went lo far as to pass acts for raising an army and equipping a fleet, and that, too, with the avowed intention of making war against us ; still the hirelings told the people, that she dared not go to war, and that she only meant to hulli/i I could fill a large- volume with assertions from the Times newspaper alone that rve should not yield a tittlet and that America mould not dare to go to war. But the fact is too notorious to dwell upon. There is no man, and especially your Royal Highness, who can have &iled to observe the constant repetition of these assertions. At last, however, America has dared to go to war, even against that great warrior George the Thirds nearly tbree-fiftha of whose reign has been occupied in wars, exclusive of ths wars in India. He has been not only the greatest warrior, but the greatest conqueroVf of any European prince that ever lived* Napoleon is nothing to hitn as a conqueror ; and yet the Ame- ricans have dared to declare war against him. But, even now^ now that she has actually declared war, and that, too, by an act of congress, by a law passed by real representatives of the people ; by men elected by the free voice of the nation ; by an unbri> bed, unbought, unsold, unenalaved assembly, not by a set of corrupt knaves whom the president can at any time twist about by means of the people's money j even now, when she has de- clared war in this solemn manner, the hireling newspapers 'm. London would fain make us believe, that the whole thing is a mere make*belief) that it is a mere feint, and " will end in ■moke^" At the least, they tell us, that when the news of the repeal of our Orders in Council reaches America, there must be a revocation of the declaration of war* They seem to for* get, that the declaration of war in America is an act of congress, and to do away the effect of that act, another act must pass. They seem to forget that it is the people who have declared war, and that the people must be consulted before that decla- ration can be annulled or revoked. But, sir, the fact is, that these writers talk miserable nonsense. We are at war with Ame- rica ; and, before we can have peace with her again, we must have a treaty of peace. But the main question for rational men to discuss is : " will the repeal of our Orders in Council be sufficient to induce Ame- rica to make peace with us, without including the redress of her other grievances V* This is the question that we have to dis- cuss ; it is a question in which hundreds of thousands are imme- diately interested ; and it is a question which I think may be answered in the negative ; that is to say, sir, I give it as my opinion, that the repeal of our Orders in Council will not be suf- ficient to restore us to a state of peace with America ; and I now proceed respectfully to submit to your Royal Highness the rea- sons upon which this opinion is founded. In my last letter 1 had the honour to state to your Royal 1 tm LtUm of William Cohhritt Ei^ HighncM, that there was another great pohit with America ^ namelj, the ImpreMment of American eeameHf nhicb must be awtjaated tiefore harmony could be reatored between the twa countriei } and, as you meat have perceived, thia subject of complaint atanda at the head of Mr. Madiaon's atatement of the grounda of war } it atanda at the head of his manifesto againat< our govemmeDt. Hia own words wili best speak thia mean- ing: ** Without going beyond the renewal, in 1808, of the war ia which Great Britain is engaged, and omitting unrepaired wronga •f inferior magnitude, the conduct of her government presentt t series of acts hostile to the United States aa an independent And neutral nation. British cruisers have been in (he continu- ed practice of violating the American flag on the great highway of nations, and of seising and carrying off persona sailing under it ; not in the exercise of a belligerent right, founded on the law of nations against an enemy, but of a municipal prerogative over British aubjecta. British jurisdiction is thus extended to neu« tral vessels in a situation where no lawa can operate but the law of nations, and the laws of the country to which fbe vessels be<* long; and a self-redress Is assumed, which if the British subjocta were wrongfully detained, and alone concerned, ia that substitu- tbn of force for a resort to the responsible sovereign, which falhi within the definition of war. Could the seizure of Britisk ■ubjects, io such cases, be regarded as within the exercise of a belligerent right, the acknowledged laws of war, which forbid aa urticle of captured property to be adjudged without a regular inveatigation before a competent tribunal, would imperiously demand the fairest trial, where the sacred rights of persona were at issue. In place of such trial, (hese r^hts are subject- ed to the will of every petty commander. The practice, hence, is so far from affecting British subjects alone, that, under the pretext of searching for these, thousands ot American citizens under the safeguard of public laws, and of their natmnal flag, have been torn from their country, and from every tbii^ dear to them— have been dragged on board ships of war of a foreign nation, and exposed under the severities of their discipline, to be exiled to the most distant and deadly climes, to risk their lives in the battles of their oppressors, and to be the melancholy instruments of taking away those of their own brethren. Against this crying enormity, which Great Britain would be so prompt to avenge if committed against herself, the United States have in vain exhausted remonstrances and expostulations : and that no proof might be wanting of their conciliatory dispositions, and no pretext left for a continuance of the practice, the British government was formally assured of the readiness of the United States to enter into arrangements, such as could not be rejected^ Letttrt of JVilliam Cohhdt, Eaq» n If the KCOTer J of the British labjecta were the real and th# sole object. The communication passed without effect." The grievance here complained of is certainlj xatj great» and cannot be expected to oe borne by any nation capable of resistance. If England were at peace, and America at war, and the latter were to assume the right of stopping our merchant vessels at sea, and taking out of them, by force, any men whom ■ her officers might choose to consider as Americans, what should wt say to the assumption ? And would not your Royal High* ness be ashamed to exerciiife the royal authority without the power instantly to punish such an atiront to the dignity of tho crown and the honour of the country ? But degrading aa thsi impressment is to the national character of the Americans, il cuts them still deeper by the real sufferings that it inflicts ; bjr the ruin which it occasions to thousands of families; and hf the deaths which it produces in the course of every year. I. have before stated that the number of nnpressed American sea* men is very great, or at least has so been stated in America^ amounting to many thousands, constantly in a state of the most terrible bondage to them ; and, as some are daily dropping off^ while others are impressed, the extent to which the evil hat been felt in America must have been very great indeed, during BO long a war. Our corrupt newspapers, with the Times at their head, are endeavouring to misrepresent the nature of the complaint of America, and thereby to provide the ministers beforehand with a justification for war rather than aflbrd her redress. Upon the part of the President's manifesto above quoted, the Times makes these observations : . " She first complains of our impressing British seamen when found on board American vessels ; but this is a right which we now exercise under peculiar modifications and restrictions. We do not attempt to search ships of war, however inferior their force to ours : and as to searching merchantmen, we do not even do this, vaguely or indiscriminately ; but upon posi- tive and accurate information. And practically, we appre* faend, that the criminal concealment on the part of America, is a much greater nuisance to us, than a wanton search on our part is to her. Let her, however, propose * such arrange- ments' on this head as are calculated to eflfect the recoverj of British subjects, and she will find Great Britain far from averse to listen to her." This, sir, is a tissue of falsehoods and misrepresentations. The President does not complain that we impress British sea- nun ; he complains that, under pretence of taking British sea- men, we take American seamen. This is what he complains of, which is precisely the contrary of what is here stated. As ■ 'I ,-t 78 Letters of William Cobbett, Esq. 1o not taking men out of American ships of war, our govern- nient knowi well, that America has no ships of war worth ipeak« ing of, and that she has thousands of merchant ships. It is said here, we do nut search American merchantmen *' vaguely and indiscriminately ; but upon positive and accurate it[fomui- liOR." One woulil suppose it impossible for any man, capable of writing a para;;rapb, to sit down coolly and state so perfect a falsehood as this. But herein we have an instance of the length to which the hirelings of the English press will go in supporting any thing which \*hey are called on to support. It is a fact, and this writer knew it to be a fact, that any com- mander of any ship in our navy, when he meets an American merchantman at sea, does, or may, go or send on board of her, and he does, or may, take out of her any persons, who^lw his OPINION, are British subjects^ That this in a fact no one can deny : where then is the " positive and accurate information V* It is also a fact, that the Americans have frequently asserted, that our officers have thus taken out of their ships at sea many thousands of American citizens, under the pretence of their being British subjects. It is also a fact, which is proved by fhe books at our own admiralty^ that the American government, through its consul in London, baa obtained the release from our fleet, of a great number of American citizens thus impressed, seized, and carried off upon the high seas. It is also a fact, proved by the same authority, that many of the Americans, thus taken, have lost their limbs in the compulsory service of England, a service which they abhorred, it is a fact that I take upon me to vouch for, that amongst the American citi- zens thus captured and carried ofT, and forced into our service of late years, were two grand nephewn of General Washing- ioHi* and that one of the two was released from our service by the Lords of the Admiralty, in consequence of an application from the American consul, while I was in prison for writing about the flogging of the local militia in the town of Ely, and about the employment of German troops upon the occasion. And yet, sir, in the face of all these facts, has the hired writer the audacity, the cool impudence, to assert, that we ne- ver search American vessels for seamen, " but upon jjo- sUive and accurate information." With this instance of false- hood— *of wilful, shameless f\ilsehood, before them, one would imagine, that the public would never after be in danger of being deceived by the same writer ; but, alas ! sir, the cunning slave, who sells his pen for this purpose, knows well that the public, • Joho and Charles Lewi? : John was diprbarped in Febrnary, 1812, after three applications; was very badly nsed diirinn detmtion ; deserted twice, apd flogged twice. Charles was also applied for thrc«' times, and was discharced in Decenj- ber, 181 1. It was alleged in the first case that he was a native of Uoeber, and iB the other that he had voluntarily entered. IMUrs of William Cobbell, Esq, X9 sr, at leait, that that part of the public whom be wiafaes to d«< ceive, will never, till it be too late, be able to detect hiai ; he knows that his falsehood goes where the exposure seldom comes, and if it come at all, he knows that its arrival will be too late to prevent the effect to produce which is his object. He next calls upon America to propose ker arrangement upon this subject', though in the very manitesto, upon which he is commenting, the president declares that an oflTer had been made to our government to enter into an arrangement, but that " the communication passed without efiect.*' it is going verj far on the part of America to otfer to enter into any arrange- ment upon the subject ; fur wiiy should not she say, as we cer- tainly should say ; *' Take care of yonr own seamen ; keep them from us in any way that you please ; but you shall, on the seas, take nobody out of our vessels." Nevertheless, she has offered to enter into arrangements, " such," she says, '< as could not be rejected, if the " recovery of British seamen was the sole object ;" and yet this writer accuses her of the criminal concealment of our seamen ! We have rejected this otfer of an arrani^ement for the prevention of British seamen from taking shelter in American ships ; and yet this writer accuses Ameri- ca of a desire to injure us by making her ships an asylum for British deserters ! Our government say, that if we do not exercise our power of searching American ships, and taking out our own seamen, our sea service will be ruined by the desertions to those Ame- rican ships. For instance, a British ship of war is lying at Ply- mouth, and there are three or four American vessels in the same port. Numbers of the seamen get on board the Ameri- jcan ships; they get out to sea ; and, if they cannot be seized there, they go off safely to America, or to any other part of the world, and are thus lost to our navy. There is uo doubt, sir, but this might become a very serious evil, if not counteracted* But are the Americans to suffer because (for whatever reason) .our sailors desert ? And, above all, are real American citizens to be exposed to impressment, to be sent to be shot at, to be con- veyed to the West or East Indies, to be made to end their days under the discipline of an English man of war — are real Ame- rican citizens to be exposed to all this because British seamen desert, and because that desertion (a very serious crime) may become extremely dangerous to us ? I am sure your Royal Highness is too just to answer this question in the affirmative. The case must be new, because the relative situation of the two countries is a novelty in the history of nations ; but while we have an undoubted right to recover our own seamen, if we jCan do it without violating the rights of other nations, we can )iave no right, in any case, to seize American citizens. Amcri* 80 Letters of William Cobbett, Esq* <) i\ Ca says, " I do not want your seamen — I v?ouId rather not Lare them. Keep them by what means you please. Take them wherever yuu can find them in my ships : but, before you do it) produce proof of their being yours, and that, too, before » competent tribunal.'* Nothing can be fairer than this ; but this necessarily sets aside all impressments at sea, where there can be no proof given, because there can be no tribunal, or umpire, todecide upon the proofs, and we contend, that, without the pow- er of impressing at sea, our navy would be greatly injured by dvsertion, and our strength thereby materially weakened. This is the point upon which we are at issue with America— supposing the Orders in Council to remain repealed, and the dispute as to that matter to be settled — this is the point upon which, if not settled amicat)ly, we shall have war with the Ame- rican States. It is the pomt upon which the people of Ame- rica, who are something, are more sore ; and I am convinced that it is a point which they will not give up. They say, and they ti nly say, that it is a mockery for them to talk of their freedom and their independence, if the very bodies of their citizens are liable to be taken upon the high seas and forced into ihe service of a foreign sovereign, there to be treated according to the rules and regulations of that sovereign. A people sub- mitting to this cannot be called free, and their country cannot be called independent. Therefore , when the time comes for entering on a treaty of peace with America, I hope your Royal liigbness will resist ail advice tending to a pertinacious adhe» rence to the exercise of the power of itupressmtint ; for while that power is exercised we shall, in my opinion, never have real peace with America. The other point in dispute, namely, the possession of the Floridas, or, at least, that part of them which belongs to Spain, is of inferior importance ; but I am of opinion, that that f>oint will not be easily overcome, unless we are prepared to give it up. America sees the possibility of Old Spain becoming a mere puppet in the Ijands of England, and she sees the almc t certainty of its becoming a dependant upon either England oc France : and she wants neither France nor England for so near a neighbour. She has, in the adventures of Captain Henry, seen the danf^r of having a neighbour on her northern flank ; and the Fioridas are not divided by immense der^rts and lakes as Canada is. While tne Fioridas were held by the sleepy old government of Spain, America saw littJe danger ; but she will not, I am convinced, suifer either England or France to be mis- tress of those provinces. This is a point, therefore, which, in my opinion, we should be forward in (giving np, and not get into a war with America /or Ike sake of Ferdinand, as we are continuing the war with France Letters of William Cohhettj Esq. 81 the for his sake. The revolutior s going on in South America it ia the interest of the United States to encourage and assist to the utmost of their power ; and % should advise your Royal High- ness to shotv an earnest deiJire to avoid interference therein ; for if, upon the ground of supporting the authority of Ferdinand, or upon any other ground, you show a disposition to take part against the republicans of South America, that alone will be sufficient greatly to retard, if not wholly defeat, all attempts at an accommodation with America. Nay, sir, to speak freely my sentiments, i do not expect peace with America while we have an army in Spain, or, at least, while there is the smallest chance of our obtaining a settled ascendency in that kingdom; and I really think that every mile of progress that we are ma- king there puts peace with America at a greater distance. We, in this country, or the greater part of us, see no danger in the increase of atiy power, except the power of Napoleon, whose territories half envelop our coast, and whose armies are but at the distance of a few hours sail. Not so the Americans. They see danger in the increase of our power, ours being that sort of pow- er by which they are most annoyed. If they had their choice be- tween us and France, for a neighbour in South America, they would not hesitate a moment in preferring France — because hec power is not of that sort rhich would be formidable to America. What she would wish, however, is to see South America inde- pendent of Old Spain, and, of course, of the masters of Old Spain ; and she is not so blind as not to perceive, that the coa^ test in Old Spain now is, who shall have it under her control, England or France. For these reasons every victory that we gain in Spain will be an additional obstacle to peace with America, unless we set out by a frank and clear declaration, leaving South America to itself, and the Floridas to the United States. Before I conclude, I beg leave to notice that part of the speech, recently delivered by your Boyal Highness's order to the two houses of parliament, wherein mention is made of the dispute with America. The part 1 allude to is this : " His Royal High* eesb ! as commanded us to assure you, that he views with most sincere regret the hostile measures which have been recently adopted by the government of the United Statey of America to- wards tJiis country. His Royal Highness is nevertheless willing to hope, that the accustomed relations of peace and amity may yet be restored ; but if his expectations in this respect should be disappointed, by the conduct of the government of the United States, or by ihtit perseverance in any nnnarrantuble pretensions, he will most fully rciy on the support of every class of his 'ma- jesty 'a subjects, in a contest in which the honour of his majesty*^ tronn, and the best interests of his dominion^i must be inyolvee/' 11 m ■iin E 11 1. 1 I !( '■Iv m' i fit.-. ^ Letters of William Cobbetl, Es'q, I i ' m This part of the speech has been thought, with reason, to augiir xrav — for I am not aware of " any pitlensions*' of America that Bh« will not "persevere" in. If pretensions to be put forward, to be now originated, had been spoften of, there might have been more room for doubt; but in speaking of pretensions to be perse- vered in, the speech necessarily refers to pretensions already pul forward i and I repeat, sir, that I do not know of any pre- tensions that America has put forward, in which I do not believe she will persevere, to dp which the conduct of your Royal Higb- ness's ministers is eminently calculated to give her encourage- ment. A-s to support* from the people of Engkind, in a war against Ame- rica, your Royal Highness will certainly have it, if the grounds ^ of the war be clearly just ; but it would be very difiScult for your ministers to make the people perceive, or believe, that the im- pressment of American seamen, any where, and espect^ ' the very ships of America, was necessary "to the honour \> ws majesty's crown, and involved the best interests of his domi- nions.*' The people ftave now seen all the predictions of the hireling prints, with regard to America, falsitifjd ; they have been told that America could not support heriicit for a year without? ^England, and they have seen her do it for a year and a half, and ! at the end of that time dechire war. They are not now to be ^ persuaded that this gavernment can do what it pleases with .; America. It has been stated, with an air of triumph, by tile partisans of your ministers, that the opposition dsc pledged to support a wai*^ against America, unless she is satisfied with the repeal of the Orders in Council. But the people^ sir, have given no such pledge ; the manufacturers have given no such pledge ; and the war will not be a jot the more popular on account of its having the support of that set of men who are called the opposition, and for whom the people have no respect, any more than they have for their opponents^ The Orders in Council were a grievance to America j but not a greatc grievance Jhan to see her citizens dragged by force into a service which (hey abhor, on so many accounts, however pleasant and honourable it may be to our own countrymen. This grievance vas known to exist ; and, there* fore, if the opposition liave given a pledge to support a war against America, unless she be satisfied with the repeal of the Qrders in Council alone, they have given a pledge to dothat in which they will not have the support of the people. I am one of those, sir, who do not regard a great extension of trade as a benefit ; but those who do must lay their account with seeing much of our trade destroyed /or ever by a war with Ame- rica. Three or four years of war would compel her to become a manufactoring country to such an extent as never more to ^tand Wm U':i laitera of William Cobbett, Esq. ^ In need of English goods ; so that, if your Royal Highness's mi- nisters do insist upon exercising the power of seizing people on board of American ships at sea, those persons who manufacture goods for A erica must seek another market, for that is closed against thera tor ever. For many years, sir, there has existed in this country, a fac- tion perfectly desperate in their hatred of frebdom. They not only hate all free nations, but they hate the very sound of the word freedom. I am well satisOed that per«ons of this de- scription would gladly hear of the murder of every soul in Ame- rica. There is nothing that tb<;y hate so much as a man who is not a slave, and who lives out of -the reach of arbitrary power. These persons will be sorely grieved to see peace preserved be- tween the two countries on terms honourable to America; but I am, for my part, ready to confess, that with me it will be a sub- ject of joy ; I am ready to declare, that I see less reason than ever for an Englishman's wishing to see the people of America humbled or borne down; and that it will grieve me exceedingly to reflect that England is taxed, and that English blood is shed, for the purpose of enforcing the power to impress American sea- men; but this mortiBcation f shall, I trust, be spared, by the humanity ^nd wisdom of your Royal Highness. jm " .tvi TO THE PKINCK REGENT. Sir, DcRiNG the time that I was imprisoned for two years in Newgate, for writing about the flogging of the local militia in the town of Ely, and about the employment of German troops upon that occasion, I addressed to your Royal Highness several letters, the object of which was to prevent this country from being plunged into war with America. I took great pleasure in oflfering to you advice, which [ thought would be beneficial to my country ; and, of course, I have experienced great sorrow at seeing that that ad- vice has not been followed, and that, in consequence of its rejec- tion, we are now actually in a state of war with our brethren across the Atlantic. Those corruptors and blinders of the people, the hired writers, do not attempt to make (heir readers believe that we are not at war with the republic of America. They it is who have hasten- ed, if not actually produced, this war; for they it was who reviled the American president, and who caused it to be belived here that he and the congress dared not go to war. What pains, alas ! have I taken to convince your Royal Highness of the folly and falsehood of these opiuious ! Though uiy mind was bruised with ■I 04 LetUra of William Cohhett, Esq. 'i i iti ii JftVi r^' the means of raising the thousand pounds fine to pay to the king, (and which you have received from me in his behalf,) I let slip no occasion to caution you against these representations. I told you (and you might as well have believed me) that the American people were something ; that they had a say in the measures of government ; that they would not suffer themselves to be plunged into war for the gain of a set of lazy and rapacious fellows ; but that, if their country's good demanded it, they would go to war; and that such war would, in all probability, be very calamitous to England. While I was telling you this, your late minister, Perceval, was laughing at the idea of America going to war ; and his opinion was upheld by all the venal scribes in the kingdom ; that is to say, by nineteen-'twentieths, perhaps, of all those who write in newspapers, ond other political works. That we really are at war with Ameri- ca, however, the following document clearly proves. The Ame- rican congress declared war in due form; they passed an act making war against your royal sire and his people ; their govern- ment issued letters of marque and reprisal ; but, still our hirelings said that (here was no war. The following proclamation, however, issued by an American general from his head quarters in Canada, which province he has invaded, puts the fact of war beyond all doubt. ' [The proclamation of Brigadier General Hull, above alluded tOf was inserted in the Statesman of the 11th instant, to which paper we refer our readers.] He, sir, who will not believe in this, would not believe though one were to rise from the dead. This is an animating address ; and it is, at least, possible, that it may prove the forerunner of the fall of Canada, which, when once gone, will never, I believe, return to the English crown. The fact of war being now ascertained beyond all doubt, the next thing for us to think of is, the means by which we are to obtain peace with this new and most formidable enemy. The hired writers, unable any longer to keep from their readers (be fact that war has taken place, are now affecting to treat the matter lightly : to make the people of England believe, that the Americans will be driven out of Canada ; that the people of Amer'ca hate the war — and that, at any rate, (he congress will be obliged to put an end to the war, when the intelligence of the repeal of our Orders in Coun* oil shall arrive at the seat of the American government. These being the assertions now moat in vogue, and most gene- rally listened to, I will give your Royal Highness my reason for disbelieving them. First, as to the probability of the Americans being baffled in their designs upon Canada : if the contest was a contest of man to m^, upon ground wholly neutral, I should say, that the advantage ing p Letters of tVitliam Cohbetif Esq. 85 might be on our side ; but I am not sure that it would ; for the Americans have given repeated proofs of their courage. They are, indeed, known to be as brave as any people in the world. They are, too, volunteers, real volunteers, in the service they are now upon. The American army does not consist of a set of poor creatures, whom misery and vice have made soldiers ; it does not consist of the offcasts and outcasts of the country. It consists of a band of freemen, who understand things, .and who are ready to fight for what they understand ; and not of a set of half crip-^ pies, of creatures that require to be trussed up in order to pre- vent them from falling to pieces. It is the youth ; the strong, the active, the hardy, the sound youth of America, whom our army in Canada have to face ; and though I do not say that the latter will be unable to resist them« yet I must say, that I fear they will not, when I consider that the Americans can with ease pour in a force of forty or. fifty thousand men, and when I hear it stated, that we have not above fourteen or fifteen thousand men in Qana- da, exclusive of the militia, upon whom I do not know what de- gree of reliance is to be placed. After all, however, the question of success in the invasion of Canada will, as in the cases of France and Holland, depend wholly upon the people of Canada. If they have reason to fight for their present government ; if they be convinced that a change of government would make their lot worse, they will, of course, rise and fight against the invaders, and then our commander may safely set General Hull at defiance ; but if the people of Canada should have been inveigled to believe that a change of government would be for their benefit, I must con- fess that I should greatly doubt our power of resistance. It will be quite useless for us to reproach the people of Canada with their want of zeal in defence of their country. We have re- proached the Dutch and the Italians, and the Hanoverians, for the like; but, sir, it answers no purpose. Such reproaches do not tend to drive out the invaders ; nor do they (end to deter other nations from following the example of the invaded party. What a whole nation wills, must, sooner or later, take place. ,j As to the second assertion, that the people of America hate the war, I must say that 1 have seen no proof of such hatred. The Americans, being a reflecting people, and a people resolutely bent upon preserving their freedom, have a general hatred to war, as being, generally speaking, hostile to (hat freedom. But in the choice of evils, if war should appear (he least evil, they will not tail to take it — and, indeed, they have taken it — for, in America, it is really ifce people who declare war — (he congress is the real re- presen(ati\ e of the people — there are no sham elections — no buy- ing and selling of votes and of false oaths — but the members are the unbought, uncorrupted, unenslaved agents of the people, and if they cease to speak the sentiments of the people who elect them, #■ ■1.; M •Letlers of William Cobbett, Esq. f: 1 they "are put odt of the congress at the end of a very few months. It is, therefore, not only false, but stupid, to affect to believe th« war is unpopular, and the government is odious in the eyes of the people. All its members are chosen by them — and if it ceased to please them, it Tvould soon cease to exist. Nothing, therefore, can be so absurd as to suppose that a measare so important as that of war has been adopted against the will of the people. This opinion has been attempted to be sustained upon the evi- dence of a riot at Baltimore, the object of which was the silencing of a newspaper, and the end of which was bloodshed on both sides. But, t'rom this fact, the exactly contrary conclusion ought to be drawn. The newspaper in question was, as it appears, hos- tile to the warx>-and, therefore, a riot, in order to silence such pa- per, cannot be considered as a proof of unpopularity attached to the war. Though this species of attack upon the liberty of the press is far Jess injiiriotis to that liberty of the press than the base attacks dictated by despotism, and masked under the visor t)f forms dearest to freedom— slill it is an attack-*— it is answering statement and argument by violence — by something other than statement and argument. Therefore, I disapprove of the attack — but I cannot consider it as a mark of the unpopularity of the war, of the precise contrary of which it is, indeed, a very bad proof. ' Much having, in our faired newspapers, been said of this riot ; it liaving been represented as a proof of bad government in Am&> rica, and (which is more to my present purpos'^) as a sign of ap- proaching anarchy, tending to the overthrow of that government which has declared war against us, I must trespass a little further tipon this head, to beg your Royal Highness to believe nothing that the hired men say upon the subject. When the war with France began, in iTlM; that war, which appears not to promise any end ; when that war began, nsany riots took place in England, against those who were opposed to the war; many 'houses were de- fclroyed— many printing offices demoUshed — many booksellers put to flight — many men were totally ruined — and that, too, by mobs marching and killing under banners on which were inscribed *' Church and King*'* Now, as there was a general anarchy to follow these things in England, I beg your Royal Highness not to be persuaded to believe that anarchy will follow the demolish- ing of a printing office in the United States of America, where there ore more newspapers than there are in all Europe, this coim- try included. Once more, however, I express my disapprobation, and even my abhorrence, of that demolition : which was the less excusable, as the assailants had freedom, real freedom of the press, to answer any thing which the bribed printer might publish, and our king and our glorious constitution: for it appears to me, that if the world believed in the necessity of this power of impressment, it must think either that our boastings of our blessed state are untrue, or that our sailors are not the most wise or the most loyal set of men. I am for wiping off the stigma ; and without crying or faint- ing away, as Sir V icary Gibbs is reported to have done at Horse- monger lane, I am for showing the Yankees, and the whole world, that we want no terror to keep our seamen to their duty ; that we are not afraid of their skulking from our fleet to take refuge in American ships ; that we entertain not the disgraceful apprehen- sion, that those who have once had the honour to sail under the Royal flag of the house of Hanover, will ever prefbr that of the. American, or any other republic. -tm- rx Honour, sir, as well as po'acy, seem to me to dictate the giving up of this power ; and, as the giving of it up might, and, as I thinks would, cause the restoration of peace between England and Ame- rica, I will not be persuaded that such a measure does not accord with tfie wishes of your Royal Highness. As to " the exhausting the resources of America," which nom begins to be talked of by that most corrupt of newspapers, ther ' Times, I do most earnestly beseech your Royal Highness to beae» in mind how long the late Pitt promised this deluded nation thatt he would exhaust the resources of republican France! Sir, Mr.| ' Madison, though a very plain-dressed, sleek- headed ntan; though: he wears neither tails, nor bags, nor big wigs, nor robes; though^. ' he dresses in a pepper-and-salt coat, and a nice dimity waistcoat,* Icnows a great deai more of our real situation than I believe manjr* \ of your ministers know of it ; and I should not wonder if he knei^,^ almost as much of it as your Royal Highness's self does. He is a man, sir, who is not to be led by our hireling prints ; he sees our gold at above five pounds an ounce ; he has seen acts passed*' which, in effect, force the circulation of our bank notes; and, see- ing this, he does not want any body to tell him what is coming ^ seeing this, he will laugh at the idea of our exhausting the resour- ces of America, the capital of whose whole debt does not amount io a tenth part of one half year's interest upon our debt. Thi» ground of hope is, sir, more visionary than any other. Indeed, tAiey are all equally visionary. There is no hope of any thing but loss and injury to us by a war with America. ^ I have now done all that 1 am able to prevent this calamity. If the war proceeds, I shall say as little about it as circumstances LetUrB of William Cohbettf Btq. 9% will permit. I have lost no occasion of endeavouring to put aside ttiis evil ; and when the result of the contest shall be lamented— when those who now rejoice at the idea of doing mischief to free- men shall be weeping over their folly, I trust that yonr Royal Highness will jiave the justice to remember that this war had a decided opponent in your faithful servant, ya Wm. Cobbett. v«(Mb TO THE PRINCE REGENT. Sir, Whbb I closed my last letter to your Royal Highness up- on this subject, it was my intention to forbear any further remon- strance with you thereon, and to leave time to be the teacher. But the intelligence, arrived from America since the date of that letter, has made me depart from that intention, and has induced me to make one more eSbrt to convince you, that without further measures in the way of conciliation^ peace with America is not likely to be restored. The very day on which my last letter was printing, (Friday last,) was marked by the promulgation of tidings from America, that the congress had revoked the declaration of war, and that the American general in Canada had entered itUo an armistice for thirty days ; and that both these had taken place in consequence of the revocation of our Orders in Council. A few hours were suf- ficient to dissipate these falsehoods ; fabricated, no doubt, for the 5urpose of deceiving the people of this ** most thinking'* country. *he deceptbn would laat, in all human probability, for only a few days ; but, at the end of those days, a new falsehood wquld be invented, and the old one lost in th^t* This falsehood, however, does not appear to have lived even forty*eight hours ; for the very next day after its promulgation brought forth the contradic- tion ; brought forth the complete proof of a fabrication. Surely, sir, the people of America must despise us I They must despise, or, at least, pity, a nation who are made the sport of such vile lite- rary impostors ; base hirelings, who prostitute the press to all the purposes hostile to truth and freedom. ^ ^ The autheatie intelligence received from America appears to be, in substance, this : That the American government has receiv- ed intelligence of the repeal of our Orders in Council, but that it is by no means satisfied therewith, and means to demand a redress of all its alleged grievances before it lays down its arms. In con- firmation of this, the following paragraph has been quoted from a paper deemed the demi-official paper of the American govern* ment^ m ■ i ■ J; m .' ' ' j ,; ■ \ m , 1 ', ; k ,r I -iM -i'il--ih -'-»<4 -imif -.^fls A^ '% ^> IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-S) 1.0 I.I ■ 30 IIM I 40 M M 1.8 1.25 1.4 lA -* 6" — ► % ' A A VI -c*! *% ^V''^ ^'''' '^>^^;%'' ''^. /^ Photographic Sciences Corporation 73 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 872-4503 4is . /^, §^ i^ /a ii<^' LeIMfs ftfWmiam Cobbm, Etq» I 11 I > Tbe Orden in€otiBcil of the British goywmmeiit are notf n»>^ fonder a question with the United States. TLe qvestioo of peace now irequirea onty a proper and a vigorous use of the«mple meaoa which the government is posMssed of, to render it apee^jry'-deei* : aive, and glorioua. Peacoi when it comes, must bring with it inoni^» than the cot^easion of British outrage by the retraction di, i^j avowed tyranny. It is not a mere eessationio do wrong that/ can now produce a peace ; wrongs done must be redretteed ; an#« tiguarantee muet be gtvm, in the face <^the worlds for the rrsto-i' ration of our enslaved citizens, and the respect due to our flag, which, lilce the soil we inherit, must in future secure all that saib • under it. T'ie rights ei neutrals must be recognised ; and th4^ British, like the first tyrants of the Swiss, must no longer expects a free people to bow ^down and worship the sytlabds of Britnlr^ uanrpation.^' . , W Did I not tell you so^ sir, in my very last letter ? Did I not sajn^' that America would now demand "indemnitif for the patti and suuvitjffor ihefatwre /"^ 1 wished to guard your Royal Highness against droeption, and I, for that purpose, entered into an argup ment to show that we ought not to expect America to au^e peace with us upon our having barely cetutd to commit what -she u*^ sorted to be a violation of her ri^ts. I told your Royal Highness^-^ that she, for more than one reason^ must demand something moi*'': than a mere crMcrffon to do what she declared to be a wroi^^ In short, if I had been informed, when I wrote my last letter, of j what i now knon, I could not have written otherwise than I thoK did. ■' '• — • ■ •'>■ --^ rl, iderefore, have, I think, some claim to attention from your Royal Highness^ especially as I have all along told you, that the repeal of our Orders woukd not, alone, be sufficient. When the repeal took place, upon the death of Mr. Perceval, and when Mi**i Ponsonby and Mr. Brougham wero reported to be makii^ pled^Btlt to support a war against America, if that repeal did not satisfy*^ her—- at that ttme— ^t that important moment, when' conciliatioBr mig;ht have been rendered complete ; even then, without a moment's delay, I told your Royal Highness, that the repeal of the Orders wonld not, of itself, be enough, and, as will be seen by the p'*ssage taken for my motto, I most earnestly besought you to put a stop, of your own acconVitQ^ the impressment of persons on board of American ships. If thi$ had been done, sir ; if this measure,, so strongly recommended by me, had been adopted then, we should now have seen our ports crowded with American ships to take away our manufactures, instead of hearing of hundreds of Ameri* canprivateers cruising against our commerce. The Courier and Times, newspapers, two of the most corrupt in England, make certain remarks upon the paragraph which I have quoted from the American demi-official print; and as these remarks embrace asiertioiu and notions thai are false, it is neces^ LeUer9 ^ WiUUm C<^beH, £«f . 99 •arjr,or« at kas^ it ma/ be uBoful to put the mirtteraof which tb^ treat in a faix light* .-The CpurJer hat this p.aragraph: — *'Heret then, is an open avowal, that nothing wiU satisfy the American goveraroent but the (Aandimmtal of Hit right qf search^ and the acknowiedgioent of thiB principle, that free ship make free goods. Perish tlie idea ofpeactt if it is only to oe made on tuck terms. Yet this the American government calls an anxious desire to accommodate all difietences upon the mostreason^le conditions ! 1 !" The Times sajs : — " In this philippic, redress is not only claiin* edlor the supposed wro:igs inflicted by this country, but it is de« clared that the * Am<>.rican flag must «»/MlMr« secure tUl thtU atUla tmder ii'* This is adopting, in its fullest extent, the language of Buonaparte, . Uiat f free ships make free goods.' If that principle be maintained by the American governmenir, and supported by the- American legislature, we see not the slightest prospect of a speedy tesminatkm of hostilities." < Thus, then* these good hirelings are for war, rather than give u^ what they call the " riglU qf search*** They >are hardly so stupid as not to know that the Americans do not contend for oisr abandonment of the rigf/il of aearch, in the usual sense of those words; they must know that, as far as to search ships at sea (or ratli* .' to visit them) has been sanetiraed by the usage of nations^ the Americans are ready to submit to it ; but, sir, this right of search is very different indeed from that of which these good hired HKiters are speaking. There is a right of search, or of visit, acknowledged by all the nations of Europe. When a natbn is at war, she claioM the right of visiting all neutral merchant ships at sea, in order to see that they do not visit her enemy by carrying warlike stores or troops for him; and if she find them thus tiding part with her enemy ; if she find them thus transgressing the general usage of nations, she seizes them, as, indeed, she has just cause for doing, seeing that they are, in fact, engaged in the war against her. And the right of visiting them, to see whether they be thus transgressing, baa been, by us, called the right of search. We have contended for» and have, for some time past, been able to maintain, an extension nf this right to the goc 's of an enemy found in a neutral ship ; though it is to be observed, that our ally, Russia, and our ally, Sweden, as well as Denmark and Holland, in all times, have con* tended against this right. But whai have these to do with the searching of which Americans complain? They complain, not that we seize contraband of war on Iniard their vessels; not that we confiscate ships or cargoes where there are enemv'g lioopa or enemy's goods ; but that we stop their vessels upon the high seas, and that there we take out of them whatevkr pehboas wjs PLBABE. This is what they complain of; and the fact is perfect- •rH .AM f-lrlil $tMten of William Cdbbm, Esq, I. ) Ii Ijr notorious, that we have, id tfaia mty, taken many thouialMki of peraom out of American Bhipi, carryii^ on thdr trade i^tti^tlj firom one part of the world' to another. It is notofnouSi that many «f the persons thus seized frere citizens and native Americans ; that they have been taken on board uf ottr ships of war; thsit they iMve been kept there for years; that they have been talr*tn to all tarts of the world ; that many f^ them have been wounded^ many ave lost their limbs, and many killed, in a service which they ah* horred, being compelled to' fight against those with whom th^y bad no quarrel. There hmo man of any consideration, who will attempt to say tiiat this is right. It must of rieeessityt have Created a deep-irooUsa iU wiH i^inst us in America, where the seafaring people aire not a class of individuals who have neither house nor home, and whose state ki desperate. A vessel, in America, is often manned by peo- ple «ll living in the same village; and the impressment^ the' ban' ishment, the destruction of one, mustbe felt by the wholej and 1^ the whole of the neighbourhood biso. Hence~ the heart burnings hi America i^inst England. The confiscation of ships and car> goes, under the Orders in Council, ti^ether with the dreadful dia* tress to the capta:ns and crews, produced great effect i^inst us; but, great as it was, it fell short of the effect produced by tho impressment of American seamen. It has been said that, if we give up the exercise of this power of impressment, our sailors will desert to the American ships. But suppose the fact to be so: what is that to America? It is not her fault. Shedoes not force them out of our service. She does iKrt compel them to desert. If they really do like her service better tbauours, she cannot help that. We may as well complaiit of her for having such a country as our artisans and manufacturers prefer to their own, and, upon that ground, go and search her country for our deserted artisans and manufacturers, who emigrate to her shores in defiance of our laws. Really, sir, I can see no- Just cause of complaint against her because our men desert to her ships. It is for us to keep our men, if we wish them not to go into her service ; and not to complain of her for receiving them. It is a practice wholly unknown in the world before. We have never, tiat I hav? heard of, attempted to exercise such a power against any nation but America. It is true, that all our officers who may visit her ships may not conduct themselves in a maniier such as she has complained of; but it is not less true, that they are left entirely to their own discretion. They are, it is true, not authorized to take Americana out of American ships ; but, then, it is left to them, and must be wholly left to tbem, to decide who are, and who are not^ Americans. This being the esse, it is clear that every American ship's crew, who meet an English ship of war at b^a, are at the mercy of the commander of that ship of war i . Letters (^WHUm f^obbttt, Enq. n No BOCft iie«d lia said ; for no man likes to ho at the mncj of anotlior. The J&igruh captain has, in this case» tb<9 power of aei" siire« of imprisonment, cf. baonhment, and» indeed,, what power hat he not-over the American crew ? They may produce proof of be- ing natives of America, and then he is not authorissed to seizo them. Aye ! but he, alas 1 is the sole and absolute jWge fthat proof, which he may think bttdy and then it may as well not be produced. Thiais the view to take of the matter, stf. The corrupt presa of London may, and will, bewilder the minds of the people, by talking about the right of search and the like ; but the plab fact ia this: that in consequence of this authority given to our ships of war, to take persons out of American ships at sea, the crew of every American merchant ship that went to sea, or even from one port to another in Aifterica, were at the absolute meroy- of the comm&nder of the first English ship of war that hap*, pemd to meet them. Suppose the case, sir, of an Ajneri- can captain sailing out of the Delaware for the East Indies with his complement of men, being twenty, all his neighbours, met by an English sloop of war ; suppose him to have six of his men taken, in spite of all his assurances of their being nativo Americans; suppose him to pursue his voys^e with only four- teen hands ; suppose the six seized men be taken off to the West In^es ; suppose two or three die of the yellow fever ; another to be killed ; another lose an arm, and the sixth released by the inter- vention!^ the American consul at London. Suppose this case, sir, and you will suppose what may have happened. It was possible for r such cases to happen, and that was enough ; but it was a tfajng. which admitted of being rendered impossible* It is su£Bcient to say, that in consequence of this power, no American could, in a merchant ship, sail the sea in safety. He never was, for one uin- gie hour, secure against captivity and banishment. To a people so situated, war must be a rdief. The American seamen will prefer var, b'^jcause, if captured in war, the laws of war protect him and feed him as a pr?'8o?t«t'-- whereas he was before liable, not on< 'v to be seized and carried from his calling and country, but, at the same time, compelled to act as a seaman on tioard of our ships ; compelled to labour and to risk his life in our service, where it might be his lot to assist in serving others of his own countrymen as he himself had been served. Sir, when you take a dispassionate view of this matter, I am quite sure, that the justice of your mind will decide you in fovour of an abandonment, a frank abandonment, of the exercise of this power, which is, I am satisfied, without a precedent in the usage of nations, and which, under the present circumstances, can do nothing towards the safety of the country. If this pomt were once settled, it appears to me that muchdiffic -m ':\:r-i c If LeQehofWilltim Cobheti, ^aq, eulty would not remaiA. Bdt* as I had the honour to itate to yoar Roydi Higbnets, it is not to betuppoRod, that war is to cease the moment we ceaee to do wrong to America. I havs not taken upon me to say, whether our Orders in Council were a wrong or not ; but, by the repeal, we seem to have acknowledged that they were. If, then, they were a wrong, the cessation of them cannot be considered as sufficient to induce America to put up the sword at once, and without further ceremony. When I published what was called a libel, in the year 1812, that is to say, wbi^n I publish- ed an expression of my feelings at what had then been described as having taken place at the town of Ely, (where the bank has since broken,) with respect to the local militia and the Gerqaan legion ; when I made that publication, I ceastd-^A made only one of that sort ; yet, sir, was I, at the distance of a year after the publication, sentenced to be imprisoned for two years, and fo pay a thousand pounds fine to your royal sire, and which thousand poundci I have paid to you in his behalf. So you see, sir, that after one has done a thing, or has been doing a thing, it is not aN ways sufficient to cease to do it ; tie ceasing lo do that which is deemed wrong is not always regarded a» sufficient to appease, or disarm the offended party. The last part of my punishtnent, the payment of the fine to you, in behalf of your royal sire, was inflict- ed at more than three years* distance from the time of my writing about the local militia and the German legion. There may, per- haps, in the law of nations, be an exception from the general prin- ciples, in cases where a kingly government commits an offence, or alleged offence, against a republic ; but, in ray small reading, I hav<^, I must confess, never met with any such exception. Therefore, I, for my part, was not at all surprised to see the American demi-official print announce, that compensation for the past, and security for the future, would be required. " It is not," says the writer, '* a mere zessdtion to do wrong that can now produce a peace ; wrong done must be redressed^ and a guarantee must be given in the face of the world." Yes, sir, just as in my case, who, after imprisonment and fine, was compelled, before I was released, to enter into bonds, to give a guarantee, as the re- publican writer calls it. Indeed, sir, the history of the world is full of cases in support of this doctrine of the Americans. When your royal brother invaded Holland, it was not sufficient that he ceased to penetrate into the country ; for when he got back tQ the Helder, though he had then entirely ceased to be an invader) and appears to have vety properly confined his wishes to the safe bringing-otfofhis army, the republican generals BrUne (the '* prin- ter's boy of Limosin") and Daendals^ insisted upon the surrender, to France and Holland, of eight thousand of their seamen, who were then prisoners of war in England ; this they insisted upon <' as the price of permission to the British troops, with whom the iMUra qf William CohbeH, Ea^» H duke of Yprk had invaded Holland, to re'embark on board tlieir. inmpotii^tHilanU molestaiion" Tnuk.vraB a cpmpebBation for iiyury, not done, but fUtempiet^r 'I nave hiDi cracked in the brain. His Royal Highiiess knew agreatj^ deal better. He took the effectual way of giving his opponentSj,,' satisfaction, ahd thus he was enabled to bring off his army without; uibleBtatibn. :. Here, theft, sir, are two instani^es of the soundness of the Ame- rican docirine ; that a mere cessation of an offensive act is not, ai||^ a mattet of course, deeoled a satisfaction to the party offended*^! N^y, in my case, that was single ; it was committed in a moiqent ; it at onCe ceased ; there was no remonstrance ; no expostulatioii ; the single act was seized hold of, and my printer ana publisher* and one of the newsmen, though they did not attempt to defend their conduct, but confessed their crime, declared on oath that they were wholly unconscious that they were publishing a libel, and humbly sued fo^ mercy ; though they did all this, yet they were all imprisoned. Upon what principle, then, t ask, can these corrupt writers imagine, that America is to be satisfied with the mere repeal^, of bur Orders in Council ; that is to say, with the mere cea«. sation of the acts offensive to her ? Upon what ^und is it that the country, in which the proceedings against me took place, can expect this at her hands ? I do not say that we were doing hec wrong ; I do not take upon me to decide that question* If we were not doing her w'^ng, however, why did we repeal? If we were not doing her wrong, why did we yield at her menaces ? If we were not doing her wrong, we should not have given way ; and if we were doing her wrong, we should have gone further ; for, upon the principles on which I was punished, and on which the sansculotte generals insisted upon your royal brother's giving up 8000 prisoners of war then in England; upon those princi- ples, a mere cessation to do what gives offence is not considered as a sufficient atonement to the offended party. The President of the United States has seen himself ridiculed, and most grossly abused in our venal newspapers, who, amongst other qualities not more to be admired, have ascribed to him t^t of cowardice. Such language does not tend to harmony ; aad though (thank God !) Mr. Madison cannot, by his obstinacy, or to indulge any old grudge, plunge his country into a war ; yet he cer- tainly has the power to render the way to peace more difficult. I must, however, do him the justice to say, that I do not believe hioa capable of imitating, for one single moment, those detestable mis- creants, whom history has but too frequently exhibited in the act 13 'M i 'li'J ■ h ij m ■m n m 4' '*fl w^ Lifferi of William CohhelU tRsq. of rcJDderiog laillions misera'b!<) (bcithe purpose 6f gratify iog somtf stupid, some i((iot*like, some hog>like passion. But, without being under ««^ such influence, and without supposing anV very strong^ prejudice against England in the minds of the people of America, there are, 1 fear, reasons enough to induce Mr. Madison U> hh in no haste to listen to termif of peace. America has long felt the power of England ; she has long been compelled to endure that which she detested \ she is covered it'iih scars of our inflicting ; and she will not forget all this now that she has arms in her hands. 1 pave before pointed Out to your Royal Highness of what importance it is to her that we should iiave nothing to do in the affairs of Spain. The war in Spain is, in fact, more fearful tb America when it is most promising in ap- pearance to us. She will never rest contented while there is a chance of ou^ having any influence in Spanish Bouth America. Of Napoleon she is not afraid in that qua-ter. He has no fleet to endadger her commerce ; and, besides, her present exertions against us rdav, perhaps, secure her his assent to her wishes on ifaat flank of her territories. As to our internal situation, she is well aware of it. Th6 arm^ in Canada is not better known to her than the army iii the ** dts- , hirhed coimties" Mr. Madison is very well acquainted With the Causes of our disturbances ; he has read before now all the evi> dence taken at the bar of parliament ; he has seen it proved that the people of England are Suffering greatly from the non-importa- tion of their goods into America; he is well aware of the wants of our artny in Spain, Portugal, and the Mediterranean ; and he knows that a war with his country must soon plunge us into the greatest distress. It is with a knowledge of all these that Mr. Madison enters on the war ; and under such circumstances, it appears to me impos- sible that he sLjuld listen to any terms of peace not including ample indemnity for the past. The American prints seem to insist upon a guarantee for the release of the American seamen whom we have impressed. This, I i^ould hope, there would be no ob- jection to; and, indeed, I hope that your Royal Highness's minis- ters will now, at the eleventh hour, do every thing in their powec to procure us the restoration of lionourable peace j i hope that England is not doomed to wage war against every man in the world who is in the enjoyment of real liberty. 1 know, sir, that there are, in England, men who abhor the American government and people, and who would, if they had the power, exterminate them both, merely because the one guarantees, and the other enjoys freedom. Such men will never be happy while they see a freeman in the world : but their malice will not be gratified ; they will, though it blast their eye-sight, still see tb? Americans free. Such men always speak of America with disdain ; they afiect to con- sider her as nothing ; they seem to think that no ceremony is ne- LiOtrp of William Cobifett, Biq, 99 ctanry with facr ; (hal even yrhtn die Lm declared iraJ', tad hai actually begun war, the is bound to leave off* oiereljr upon our ceasing to do her wrong, if wrong it be. Such men would, of course, think it a mortification to send over to htrpa^c ourtureit which one oi them already calls suing for peace, far from yonf Royal Highness be couflsets like these! This was the language with regard to the republicans of France ; but the hauj^ty Pitt was glad, at last, to be permitted to send overtures of peace to those republicans. I hope, therefore, that we shall, in tfait case, be wise in the outset, which is far better than wisdom at the filou. . The wh I i: 1,1 » (!' 1 llJ!: IH I«e|^r 106 Lelters of William Cohbelt, Esq. iJerity of (he country ; these men care not how the people luffer* Their object is to prolong (he war, which suits the views of (hose with whgP they are connected. They assert whatever presents itself as fflnly to promote this object, and, therefore, they take n» pains to ascertain whether the building of twenty frigates iS) or is not, a matter of easy execution in America. If they did, they would find, that the Americans have the timber, the.iron, the pitch, the hemp, all of the produce of their own country i all in abun- dance ; all, of course, ehi^ap ; and as to dock-yards, |md other pla- ces (o build ships, inquiry would (each these ignorant and inso* lent men, that, in many cases, (he timber grows upon (he very spot where (he ship is to be built, and (hat to cut it down and convert it into a ship is doing a great benefit to the owner of the land. And, then, as to the pecuniary meanSt to hear the language of our hirelings, one would imagine that the people of America were all hfggars ; that (he country contained scarcely a man of pro- perty; that there were no such things as money, house goods, cattle, manufactures. They must, indeed, confess that the coun- try grows corn ; but somehow or other, (hey would have us be- lieve, (hat there are, in America, no means, no resources. Thejr cannot disguise from us the fact, that there are fine cities and towns; that there is a commercial marine not far behind our own in point of magnitude ; that the exports from the country amount annually (o more than half as much as our exports, and that they consist of articles of first necessity; that the country contains all the articles of useful manufactory, and that manufactures are ma- king great progress ; nay, that they have arrived at great perfec- tion ; that the country is stocked with sheep, (hat great source of a nation's wealth, and that to so high a degree have these animals succeeded, that many single proprietors have already flocks of more than a thousand head. These facts the hired press cannot disguise from us ; or, at least, from those amongst us, who are not wilfully blind. Upon what ground, then, sir, would they have us believe, that America is (feslitute o^ resources J* The things which I have here spoken of, are things of which national riches consist ; they form the means of making national exertions ; of sending forth fleets and armies. And we ought to bear in mind, that America, that this new enemy of ours, has a population of more than eight millions of souls, none of whom are paupers, none of whom are clad in rags i none of whom are without meat upon their table daily ; not one soul of whom would condescend to pull off his hat to any human being. And this is the nation, a nation, too, de- scended from ourselves, that the hirelings of the London press represent nn destitute of resources! Perhaps, sir, the resources of America are estimated according to tfae salariM which their public functionaries receive— cuid* mea- Laters o/ William Cobhetl, Esq, W lured by (his standard, our new enemy must, indeed* appear 'wholly unable to contend agauiat us for a single day ; for the pre*. •ident, the vice president, the secretaries of state, the treasury, war, navy, and all their clerks ^ that ia to say, the whole of the officers of the executive government, do not receive more tluin about half tke amount of Lord Arden*8 sinecure, as stated in the report to the house of commons in 1 BOO. Nay, the apothecary to our army does, according to the same report, receive, in clear profits, annually, as much as twice the amount of the salary of the President of the United States. Our chief justice, in salary and emoluments, as stated in the reports laid before parliament, re- ceives annually a great deal more than Mr. Madison, Mr. MonrdS, Mr. Gallatin, and the secretaries of the war and the navy in Ame- rica, all put together. I shall, perhaps, be told that our public functionaries ought to receive more than those of America. That is a point which I shall leave for others to dispute. I content myself with staling the tiicts; but if I am tuld, that we ought not to measure the salaries of our functionaries by the American stand- ard, I must beg leave, in my turn, to protest against measuring the expenses of war in America by the standard of war expenses in England. I must insist, too, that the resotirces of a country are not to be measured by the standard of the salaries of its public functionaries. I should take quite a ditferent standard for the measuring of the resources of America. We know that upon a population of ten millions, in Great Britain, a revenue of about eighty millions of pounds is now annualU/ raised'— and that, in these ten millions of people, we include, at least, two millions of paupers. Now, then, if they raise but a tenth part as much upon the eight millions of A nericans, who have no paupers amongst them, their eight millions will be four times as much p.s was ever yet raised in the country in any, one year ; and it is, I think, not too much to suppose, that an American will bear a tenth part as much taxes as an Englishman, in the prosecution of a war declared by the vote of representatives freely chosen by the people at large. Eight millions of pounds sterling, raised for three or four succes- sive years, would build a navy, that I should, and that I do, con- template with great uneasiness; for, as I once before had the ho- nour to state to your Royal Highness, the Americans are as good sailors as any that the world ever saw. It is notorious that the American merchant ships sail with fewer hands, in proportion to their size, than the merchant ships of any other nation ; the Ame- ricans are active in their persons ; they are enterprising ; they are brave ; and, which is of vast consequence, they are, from education and almost from constitution, sober, a virtue not at all less valuable in an army or a fleet than it is in domestic life. This, sii, is a view of the means and resources of America, very different, perhaps, from the views which some persons might B'. ■ ■m .ii: ■<'Ha m Lettm ^ Wmiam CobbtU, Esq, be dnpoied to preaent to jour Royal Highness ; and if tliiS} my view of the matter, be correct} it sorely becomea as to b6 Tery cautions how we force these resources into action, and set them in array against ua, baclced, as they will be» with the implacable hatred of the American people. If, indeed, the Aonottr of Bog<^ land required the setting of these resources at defiance ; if En^ land must either confess her disgrace ; mast basely abandon her known rights ; must knuckle down to Ame ^ca, or brave the con* ■equencea of what I have been speaking of} I should then say, to the words of the old Norman proverb, (adopted by the French in answer to the duke of Brunswick's proclamation,) ^* let honour be mauUainrdt happen p^hat rvilU* But, sir, the question : Does the honour of England require the making of this perilous experiment ? In my opinion it does not { and I now, with the most anxious hope, that, at last, they may be attended with' some effect, proceed respectfully to submit to your JRoyal Highness the reasons upon which this opinion is founded. The dispute, with regard to the Orders in Council, I look upon as being at an end ; for, though ail is not quite clear in that re- spect, an arrangement seems to be matter of little difficulty. But, as I am snre your Royal Highness will do me the honour to recol* ', lect, I took the liberty to warn the public, that the very week that the Orders in Council were done away, that that measure alone would do nothing towards preventing war with America. 1 then •aid, and in the most distinct terms, and without any hesitation, that America would never be content without a complete abandon- ment, on our part, of the practice of seizing persons on board her ships upon the high seas» I formed this opinion upon the general tone of the American prints ; upon the declaration of the congress ; and especially upon information contained in letters received from friends in America, in whose hearts, etrange as it may appear to some, my imprisonment in Newgate seems to have revived former feelings towards me. These letters, written by persons (be it ob- eerved) strongly attached to England, for no others did I ever number amongst my friends ; these letters assured me, that the people of America, not the governmmtt not ^^ a faction*' as our hirelings have called them ; that the people of America, from one end of the country to the other, cried for war in preference to lon- ger submission to the ntopping of their vessels on the high seas, and taking persons out of them, at the discretion of our officers. Upon this information, coming, in some cases, three hundred miles from the- Atlantic coasts, I could safely rely; and, therefore, I did not hesitate to pronounce, that the repeal of the Orders in Council alone could not preserve peace ; nor was I a little surprised to hear Mr. Brougham declare, that if that measure did not satisfy America, he, for one, would support a war against her. The question, then, is now reduced to this : Does the honour Leltm tf Wmiam Cohhett, £«f. m fever the lour one lion* hour of Bngland demand that the inmt upon continning the jpncttM of which America complainB, and against which ahe is noir making war ? To answer this question, we must ascertain whether the practice of which America complains be sanciioned by the mt^ea of the naiion ; whether the giving of it up would be to yield any known rigkt of ^ngland { because, in the caai»t)f the affirmative, to yield would be to make a sacrifice of our honour, rather than which, I agree that we ought to coutinue the war to the last extre- mity, it being much less disgraceful to submit to actual force, than to submit to menaces. My opiniob is, however, decidedly \a the negative ; and I will not disguise from your Royal Highness, that I never felt surprise more complete, (to give my feelings no stronger appellation,) than that which I experienced at reading the following passage in the letter of Lord Castlereagh to Mr. Russell, of the 29th August last : '* I cannot, however, refrain, on one single point, from expressing my surprise ; namely, that, as a condition, preliminary even to a suspension of hostilities, the government of the United States should have thought fit to demand, that the British government should desist from its ancient and accustomed practice of impress' ing British seamen from the merelmnt ships of a foreign statif simply on the assurance that a law shall hereafter be passed to prohttiit the employment of British seamen in the public or com- mercial service of that state. The British government now, as heretofore, is ready to receive from the government of the United States, and amicably to discuss, any proposition which professes tQ have in view either to check abuse in exercise of the practiie of impressmerU^ or to accomplisbi by means less liable to vexation, the object for which impressment has hitherto been found neces- sary ; but they cannot consent to suspend the exercise of a right upon which the naval strength of the empire mainly depends, un^ til they are fully convinced that means can be devised, and will be adopted, by which the object to be obtained by the exercise of that right can be effectually secured." Being no secretary of state for foreign afTairs, I shall, I trust, be excused, if 1 am found to understand less of the "ancient and accustomed practice of Great Britain as to this matter: but, sir, I have never before heard, except from the London newspapers, that Great Britian did ever, until now, attempt to take persons of any description out of neutral vessels sailing upon the high seas ; and very certain I am that such a practice is not warranted, nay, that it never was thought of, by any of those authors who have written upon public law. I do not recollect a single instance in which we have exercised what is here called a right ; anrl if, in the abandonment of the practice, we give up no known right of lijngland, such abandonment can be no dishonour ; unless, which '.w:\ till' 6\ y I" y'l 110 LdterB of WillUm Cohhett, tlaq* would be a monstrous proposition, it be regarded as dishonourable to cease to do any thing, because the doing of it has been the sub- ject of complaint and the object of resistance. The men who conduct the London newspapers, and whose lu^ cubrations are a sore affliction to their native country^ hav^ long been charging tbe'^rnericans with a wish to make England give up her ^* right of search." Whether this falsehood has arisen from sheer ignorance, or from that impunitj in deception, or rather en- couragement to deceive, which such writers have so*experienced in England, I will not take upon me to determine, but I know well that it is a most audacious falsehood ; I know that America has never expressed even a wish to make us give up *' the right of search ;" and if her government were to attempt to accomplish such an end by war, I am quite sure that it would soon lose the support of the people. But " the right of search*' is not, and never has been, for a moment, by any writer on public law, coa^ sidered as a right to search for persons, except indeed, military persons, and those, too, openly employed in the enemy's service, "The right of search" is a right possessed by a belligerent power to search for and to seize as good prize any articles contraband of war, such as gtins, powder, and the like, which may be on boai^ of a neutral ship going to an encmy!B port ; because, by carrying the said articles, the neutral does in fact aid the en-^my in carry- ing on the war. This right has been further ext aded to any goods belonging to an enemy, foAnd on board a neutral vessel ; because, by becoming the carrier of his goods, the neutral does, in fact, screen bis goods, as far as possible^ from capture, and does thereby also aid the enemy. This is what is called "the right, of search ;" a right, however, which, as far as relates to goods, has been often denied by neutral powers, and which we actually gave up to the threats of Russia, Sweden, and Denmark, towards the end of the la. (hat no credit, is to be given to any act of the Ameri- can government ; that our officers ou^t not to believe the pasaports and certificates produced b^ the American seamen. If this is to be the tone, and if we are to act accordingly, there is no possibili- ty of making peace with America. Peace implies treaty and con- fidence ; but what confidence are w« tp have in a nation such as •ur hirelings describe America to be ? This arrogant, this inso- l|ent tone must be dropped, or peace is impossible. The fact of our icupressing native Americans k affected to be denied, and Lord Castlereagh does not notice the propob^t'jO' to restore those whom w« have already impressed. But, sir, if the fact were not perfectly notorious, that thousands have been, released by us, the letter of Captain D^icres, of the Guerrierty re* moves all doubt upon the subject ; for, in that letter, intended to account for his defeat by the Conatitiitiont he says, that part or HIS CREW WKHB NATIVE AMERICANS, and they not choosing to fight against their country, he suifered them to be inactive spee- taturs. Now, here we have the fact clearly acknowledged, that we had Americans unwillingly serving on board. And what a la- mentable contrast do we find in the same letter, with regard to some English seamen said to have been on board the Constitu- tion; to which I beg leave to add, for your most serious moment, the fact, (if a fact it be,) that part of the crews of the victorious American ships, the JVasp and the United ,State8f wei^ English. Kay, it is stated in the Courier newspaper, upon what is asserted to be eood authority, that two thirds of the crews of the Ameri- can ships of war are English seamen. If this be true, it is ano- ther and a most cogent reason for acceding to the terms of Ameri- ca, and putting an end to the war ; for the longer the war continues, the longer will continue a connexion from which such fearful con« sequences may ensue. At any rate, it appears to me, thai our «wb safety, if the war ia to be continued, will dictate the discharging of all the impressed Americans whom w« may have on board of our ships. Fight agai.i3t their country they wUI not, unless they be forced, and who is to foresee and provide against the contagion of such an exam- ple ? Against this evil, however, and against numerous others, which 1 forbear to mention, the measure proposed by the Presi- dent would completely guard ua; and the respect which it is my duty to entertain towards your Royal Highness, bids me hopa &al that proposition will finally be accepted. WlI-UAML COBBETT. l& ' ■ >. \,^ \: 'i 3 f .,. ';| { % ' \ V f 'M • 4 1' I n4 •■IT,*' ' Mera of William CqhhtUy Esq, ABfEUICAM STATES. tUv tiro last numbers were devoted principally to (be ta«k of endeavouring to convince the Prjnce Regent, and the public, that it was neitber dangerous nor dishonourable to yield to the terms opop whicb we might have bad, and may yet have, peace with^ America ; and to my great mortificationi though, I must confess^ sot much to my surprise, | now see, from the contents of the last Gazette, wherein is his Boyal Highpess*a " dechrai^m" that alt my endeavours have been of no avail, and that war, long and ex- pensive, sanguinary war, will now take place with an enemy, wh0| above all others, is capable of inflicting deep wounds upon this al- ready- crippled, or, at least, exhausted nation. From the ^rst pub- Iwation of the letters which passed between Lord Wellingtoq imd Mr. Pinckney, soon after the French bad announced their intention to repeal the Berlin and Milan Decrees ; from the ver^ day of that publication, which took place soon after f was impri- soned in Newgate for two years, (with a fine to the Kiifo, whicti I have since paid, of a thousand pounds,) for having written and published upon the subject of flogging certain English militia men, at the town of ^ly, in England, who had been first reduced to submission by German troops ; from the very day of that publica- tion I began to fear the present sad result of the dbpute which ha4 then assumed a new and more serious character than it had eve^ before worn* With that fear in my mind, I bent all my feeblft powers towards preventing such result. I have failed i opinions lUld councils the direct opposite of mine have prevailed; and time will show who was right and who was wrong. Upon former occasions, the real grounds of war have but too often been lost sight of in the multitude and confusion of subse* quent events ; the government had the address to enlist the pas- sions of men on its side, and the voice of reason has been stifledf Put here, as I was from the first resolved it should be, there is a clear, a diptinct, an undisguised ground before our eyes ; we know well what we are at war for ; we know, and must bear in mind, that we are at war for the purpose (^ enforcing our practice of stopping American vessels upon the high seas, and taking out of than aU such persons as our naval qfficers may deem t6 he Bri- iish seamen. This is now to become the clearly defined subject of the war with America, The " dkclai^ation," which will be found below inserted at full length, does not contain any nem matter : it is a summary of what our ministers have before alleged and asserted in their correspondence with the American govern- ment and its divers agents. But there are some few passages of it which require to be particilarly noticed. The question relating A. idllitrs qf mUum Cobbettt Baq. 115 Itt the Orderl In Couocil b«s been bflfi>r6 so ampljr diicuned, in my several letlers and articlei upon the lubject, that I will not en* Cnmber my present remarks with any thing relating thereunto | but will cortfine myself to what relates to the impressment of per- •ons out of American ships on the high seas. Upon this point the « declaration" says : ** His Royal Highness can neter admit, ihAt in the exercise of the imd6ubtedt and hitherto undisputed right of starching ntutral mtr» chant Vessels in time of war^ the impressment of British seamen, when found therein, can be deemed any violatian of a neutral flag. Neither can he admit, that the taking such seamen from on board such vessels, can be considered by any neutral state as a hostile measure, or a justifiable cause of war. There is no right moro clearly established than the right which a sovereign has to the alieKiance of his subjects, more especially in time of war. Their allegiance is no optional duty^ which they can decline and resume at pleasure. It is a call which they are bound to obey : it began witk their birth, and can only terminate with their existence. If a similarity of language and manners may make the exercise of this right more liable to partial mistakes^ and occasional abuse, when practised towards the Teasels of the United States, the same circumstances make it also a right, with the exercise of Which, in regard to such vessels, it is more difficult to dispense.'* The doctrine of allegiance, aa here laid down, I adaiit, with •ome exceptions ; but as to the right of impressing British seamea on the high seas, out of neutral ships, I deny it to be founded on uny principle or maxim, laid down by any writer on public law. Indeed, the ** declaration" does not say sBAaoHino neu- tral vessels in time of war, is ** undoubted,** and has hitherto been ** undisputed*'* This is not correct ; for not only has even this right been doubted ; not only are there two opinions about it in the books on public law» but the writers on public law are, for the most part, against the said rights as we practise it, and they con- tend that we have no right to seize enemy's goods on board of merchant ships which are neutral. Nay, the contest 4ias given rise to military resistance on the part of odr now ally, Russia, Denmark^ and Sweden ; and, what is still more. Great Britain ceased, upon their threats, to exercise this, even this, right of seiz- ing enemy's goods on board of neutral ships of war. But this right of SEARCHING neutral ships ; what has it to do with the inu pressment of persons on board of such ships ? That is what the Americans object to, and are at war against. They are not at war Against our rights of search, even in our own interpretation of that right. What they object to is, the stopping of their vessels on the high seas, and taking people out of them by force: a practice which, f repeat it, is sanctiutied by no principle or maxim of an/ writer on public law, nor by any usage heretofore in the werld. ,-,';*• .;('-.^ ^'1 f I Ill [ A 1.1 Hi Lelien of William tlobheltt Egq. V Tho "DECLAnATioN** ttoci not aiiert, ai Lord CaitlerMgb (lid, in his letter to Mr. Riissell, that this practices la sanctioned bj anj former usage ; but it declares the right from the right of Hearch. It saya that, in exereining ** the right of search, that n to say, the right of search for articles eoniraband of mar, and for ^^emx^B goodst ire have a right to imnresa British seamen, if we find thetai* So that this is the new shape of the defence of the practice : we do not new assert that we have a right to stop Ame« rican veasela upon the high seas, ybr the purpose of impressing oar seamen ; but, having stopped them for the purpose of exercining our old **rigm of «cnrc/i, we have a right to avail ourselves of the opportunity to take o«t persons whom our own oflEioers, at their discretion, may }u(lge to be British seamen. This is not even plnuaibler in my opinion ; for, what right can we have to im- fress, if we hwe no right to stop for the purpose of impressing ? may enter another's house to search for a stolen coat, and if 1 find there my hat, I may seize it as well a» my coat, having due authority for the first} but, be it observed, that to steal the hat was as criminal as to steal the coat } and if I had known or •uapected that the hat was there, 1 might have had a search war' rant for the former as well as for the latter. The law of nations calls the high seas the common right of nv tioVHi. A ship there is a parcel of the state to which she belongs^ and the sovereign rights of that otate travel with her. The sole exception is, as has been before stated, the beliigerenta have a right to search neutrals for goods of the enemy, and for warlike stores and troops, carrying for the enemy's use ; because, as far aa neutrals are engaged in such a service, they are deemed to be in the service of the enemy. In all other respects a neutral ship car- ries with her, on the high seas, the rights of sovereignty apper* taining ta the state to which she belongs. Now, it is well known, that no nation haa a right to enter the territory of another to exer* cise any authority whatever, much less that of seizing persons, and carrying them away by force; and, indeed, is it not fresh in every one's memory, what complaints were made against the French for entering the territory of the elector of Baden, and aeizing the Duke of Enghein ? If we have a right to enter Ame- rican ships on the high seas, and take out of them, by force of arms, British seamen, what should hinder us from having the same right as to any seaports of America ? Nay, why should we not go and seize our numerous manufacturers, who have been (contrary to our laws) carried to America with cloths and cutlery ? Their alleging, that they went thither to avoid the effect of prosecutions for libel, or for some other of our state crimes, would be no bar to our claim upon them ; and^ in short, they could never be safe fo the last moment of their lives. Lttier^qf William Cohbelt, £«). 117 • it to laid, tfatt the leimeD on board of American fbipi are duert' tn. Be it »o. We may be aorry that thej do deiert ; but it la no crime io tiiie Americana that our Bailors go into America. la it not well known that numeroua detertera from (he Austrian nnd Prutaian armies have, at all times, deserted into the 1 ghbouring states ; and is it not equally well known, that the neighbouring atate has invariably possessed the undisputed right of giving them |.rotection, and of enlisting them in its service ?. Why, therefore, should we deem it a crime in America, whose abundance of laada and provisions, whose high price of labour, and whose happiness of the lower orders of maokmd, hold out their arms to the whole world ? And here I cannot help introducing a remark upon the proposition made by Lord Castlereagh to Mr. Russell, toat the American government should stipulate to deliver up all British seamen in the service of Americans. Mr. Russell is said to have expressed himself as having been shocked at this proposition) lyhich has afforded an abundant theme of abuse by our hireling writers. But I have no scruple to say, that I firmly believe that it was a proposition that never was before made to any inde« pendent state ; even to the most petty state of Germany. There was a plan, some years ago, in agitation amongst the states of Eu- rope, for putting in force a mutual surrender of each others sub- jects, whereupon, the Abbe Raynal remarks, that if it had gone into effect, each of the several states might have taken the motto of Dante over the entrance to his infernal regions : He who en- ters here leaves even " /tojpe behind.' He represents it as the ut- most stretch of tyranny ; a point, he says, which the world ought to perish rather than reach. And, therefore, though Lord Cas- tlereagh's proposition did not go this length ; though it was con- fined to British seamen, we have no reason to abuse Mr. Russell for his expression. It will be said, may be, that Mr. Russell was ordered to stipu* late for the surrender, on our part, of all American seamen. Aye, but the difference is, that Mr. Russell proponed those only who had been impressed by us ; whereas, we wanted to stipulate for the surrender of those British seamen who had gone into Ameri- ca of their own free ruill. We wanted to have surrendered to us men who were employed in American merchant ships ; they wanted us to surrender men whom we had seized in their ships, and forced into our men of war. But is it possible that any one can find any thing to object to in a request, that, as a preliminarily we should give up the Americans whom we had impressed into our service ? What is the slate of those men, now in service ? W^hat is their state? Has the reader reflected upon this? They must be useless on board of ships, they must not act ; they must do no seaman's duty ; or they must, according to our own doctrine, lately exemplified at Horsemonger-iane, be TRAITORS, worthy of bemg hanged, ripped np, and cat in 54 ii 1! Hit ■J, Ml .^li hi mm tU Leikts of ffi^iUiam CfobbeU, tkq. quarter!. His Rojal HighiMBs^a declaration aaye, that aUegi> anee to his father, and hki succesaor, begins with a oian'a births and end withhis death. And is it Aot the same with American citizens? Do they not owe similar allegiance to their coui^try ? Or is it about to be pretended, that none but kings can clairti this sort of allegiance ? I do not think that auy one^ even of the wri% ters of the Times and Courier, trill have the impudence to set up this doctrine ; but this they must do before they can make out any good ground of charge against the Americans for having demanded, as a preliminary, the surrender of the impressed Ame- rican seamen. Captain Dacres, in accountiAg for the loss of his frigate, expressly states, that he had many Americana on board, whom he permitted to be spectators, from a reluctance to compel them. to fight against their country. And can the reader believe that this was the only instance in which native Americans were unwillingly serving on board of British ships of war ? What, tben^ agaiii I ask, must be the state of those Americans ? And what are tre to think of those writers who abuse Mr. Russell for proposing to us their surrender, as a step preliminary to any further arrange* ment 1 The declaration compluns, that America demanded the abandonment of the practice of impressment as a preliminary t<| her passing a law to prevent British seamen from being received on board her ships. The hireling writers have treated this de- itaand as something too insolent to be for a moment listened to. The ** dkolauatior" does not trjeat it in this lofty style ; but it speaks of it in pretty strong terms, as thus : " The proposal of an armistice, and of a simultaneous repeal of the restrictive measures on both sides, subsequently made by the commanding oiBcer of his majesty's naval forces on the American coast, were received in the same hostile spirit by the government of the United States. Ot*he suspension of (be practice of impressment -was insisted upon in the correspondence which passed on that occasion, as a mceS' iary preliminary to a cessation of hostilities. Negotiation, it was stated, might take place without any suspension of the exercise of this right, and also without any armistice being concluded : but Great Britain was required previously to agree, without any know* ledge of the adequacy of the system which could be substituted! to negotiate upon the basis o( accepting the legislative regulations of a foreign state, as the sole equivalent for the exercise of a right which site has felt to be essential to tk". support of her Tnaritime power.** Well, and what then ? " a rigJU*' it is called again ; but if America denied it to be a right, as she his uniformly done, what wonder was there that she made the proposition ? Great Britain might "/ee/," though I should have chosen the word " deem," as smacking less of the boarding-achoul Miss's style, Great Britain Plight *'fe€lf*' if fesl she must, (hat the practice complained of was Letters of William Cohbeit, Saq, 11» 4Men!iaJ to the support of her maritioie power ; bat, did -it hence folio Mr that America, aod that impressed Auiericang, should like |he practice the better for thajt? We have so long called our* selves the deliverers of the world, that we, at last, have falleo in- to the habit of squariag up all our ideas to that appellation ; and seeoi surprised that there should be aoy nation in the world in^: clined to wish for the diminution of our power, The Americans, however, clearly appear to see the thing in a different light. They,, in their homespun way, call us any thing but deliverers ; and it must be confessed, that, whatever may be our general propensity,) we do not seem to have been in haste to deliver impressed Ame- rican seamen. That one nation ought not to yield a riglUt depending for comi- nensation solely upon the legislative provisions of a foreigo stale, IS very true ; but if the right be doubtful ; if it be unsupported by any law, principle, maxim, or custom, then the case is difier- fint ; and then, indeed, the offer of a legislative provision ia a proof of a sincere desire to accommodate. If my view of the matter be right, and I verily believe it is, this is the light in which that of- fer ought to be viewed ; and I most deeply lament that it was not thus viewed by the ministers. These lamentations, however, are now useless. The sound of war is gone forth; statement and reasoning are exhausted ; the sword is to decide whether England is, or is dot, to impress, at the discretion of her naval officers, per^ sons on board American merchant ships on the high seas. There is one passage more in the "deplaration,** upon which I cannot refrain from submitting a remark or two. After stating that Ame* rica has made only feeble remonstrances against the injuries she has received from France, the ** dec^ara/ton," this ''memorable document," as the Courier cdHs it, concludes thus : ** This dispo- sition of the government of the United States ; this complete sub* aervieney to the ruler of France; this hostile temper towards Great Britain ; are evident in alnnost every page of the official correspondence of the American with the French government.'* *' Against this course of conduct, the real cause of the present war, the Prince Regent solemnly protests. Whilst contending against France, in defence not only of the liberties of Great Bri- tain, BUT OF THE WORLD, his Royal Highness was entitled to /look for a far different result. From their common origin ,vfrom their common interest ; from their professed principles of free- dom and independence, the United States were the last power, in which Great Britain could have expected to Hnd a willing instru- ment, aqd abettor of French tyranny. Disappointed in this just expectation, the Prince Regent will still pursue the policy which the British government has so long and invariably maintained in repelling injustice^ and in supportinir the general rights of nations ; ■nd under the favour of providence, relying on the justice of i r 4 t. \ I li \ in ' i3 120 Letlers of William Cohbettt Esq. hii cause, and the tried loyalty and firmness of the British nation, his Royal Highness confidently looks forward to a successful issue of the contest in whicli he has thus been compelled most reluctant- ly to engage.** The last paragraph is in the old style, and will hardly fail to remind Mr. Madison of the documents of this kidd, issued about six-and-tkirty years ago. However, the style is ■one the worse for being old; though one cannot but recollect th* occasion upon which it was formerly used. I regret, however, to find, in this solemn document, a distinct charge against the American government of " subserviency to ike ruler of France ;'* because, after a very attentive perusal of all the correspondence between the American and French govern" ments, I do not find any thing which, in my opinion, justifies the charge. The truth is, that the ^* ruler of France" gave way in the most material point to the remonstrances of America; and I have never yet read a message of Mr. Madison, at the opening of a sea* sion of Congress, in which he did not complain of the conduct of France. The Americans abhor an alliance with France ; and if they form such an aUianee, it will have been occasioned by thia war with us. This charge of subserviency to Buonaparte has » thousand times been preferred against Mr. Madison, but never,' that I have seen, once proved. It is, indeed, the charge which we have been in the habit of preferring against all those powers who have been at war with us ; Spain, Holland, Prussia, Denmark, Sweden, and, though last, not least, Russia, as will be seen by a reference to Mr. Ganning*8 answer to the propositions from Til- sit. " Subserviency to the ruler of France !" We stop the Anie* rican merchantmen upon the high seas ; we take out many of their own native seamen ; we force them on board of our men of war ; we send them away to the East Indies, the West Indies, or the Mediterranean ; we expose them to all the hardships of such a life, and all the dangers of battle, in a war in which they have no con« cern : all this we do, for we do not deny it ; and when, after man v TEARS of remonstrancef the American government arms, and sends forth its soldiers and sailors to compel us to desist, we accuse that government of " subserviency to the rtder of France^* who, whatever else he may have done, has not, that I have ever heard, given the Americans reason to complain of impressments • from on board their ships. Many unjust acts he appears to have committed towards the Americans : but he has wisely abstained from impressments, which, as I have all along said, was the only ground upon which the people of America could have been pre> vailed upon to enter heartily into a war with any power : it is a popular ground : the war is the cause of the people : accordingly, we find the motto to the war is : " Liberty of the seasj and suh men's rights " a nljf »re- a Ldteri of WUiuan Cohbetiy Eaql 4r*l, tlMMfore, regret exceeding;! jt that the M deelaration" ttylet Ameriofm^a miUit^ mf^nmunt and abettor of French iynimyJ* It is a heavy charge ; 'u w one that will stick cloee to the nummj of those who support the war; it wiH tend to inflame, rather ihtm allay the angry passionB $ and) of coarse; it will tend to kill all hopes of a speedy reconciliation. As to what the ** declaration'^' i« pleased to say about the ^'common origin" of the two nation^ if of any weight, it might be urged), I suppose, with full as much propriety by the Americana against our im}^esanunts, as it ia now urged against their resistance. I remember that it was urged with great force in favour of American submission to be taied by an £ogliah parlkment ; but, as the result showed, with as little effect as it possibly can be upon this occasion. There is one thing in this " etdling cousin" as the saying is, that I do not much like. The caUmg cousin always proceeds from us. The Amerioms never remind us that we are of the same origin with them. Thit is a bad sign on our side. It is we, and not they, who tell the world of the relationship. In short, it is weU enough for a news- paper to remind them of their or^ ; but I would not .have done it in a solemn declaration; especialiy when 1 was accusing them of being the willing tnstrument and abettor of the enemy. . "€oim mon miereH :** that, indeed, was a point to dweH on ; but, thei% it was necessary to produce something, at least, in support of the proposition. The Americana will query the fact; and, iodeedi Ihey will flatly deny it. They will say* for they, have said, that \t is not for their interest that we should have more power than we now have over the sea; and that they have much more to dread from a great naval power, than from an overgrown power on. the continent of Europe. They are in no fear of the emperor Napoleon, whose fleets they are now a match for ; but they are in some fear of us ; and, therefore, they do not wbh to see ui stronger. ' It is in vain to tell them that we are fighting in defence of the " liberties of the world.** They understand this matter full as well as we do, and, perha(^s, a little better. I should like to hear my lord Castlereagh, beginning with the declaration against the republicans of France, continue on the history of our hostilities to Ihe present day, taking in those of India by way of episode, and concluding with the war for the right of itnpresstnentt make it out how we have been, and are defending the liberties of the world. I dare say his lordship could make it out clear enough. I do not pretend to question the fact of his ability ; but it would be at once instructive and entertaining to hear Iwrv he would do it. " From their pr<^essed principles o( freedom ;'* From these, the "declaration** says, that his Royal Highness expected the U.nited States would have been the last power to become the willing instrument of French tyranny. Very true : of French 16 I it tm Latera qf William Cobhelt, Esq. immng*^ bUMhat did not hinder him from expecting them to'be A^ enemy t^ itnptessiwg mm from on. board iktir ships f and it «liQiild have bean shown how thii disposition proved them to be a willing instrument of French tjranny, or of an j tyraaoy atalU It is useless to reivile ; it is useless to fly off to other matter* > We itnpress onen on board of Americao ships upon the high seas ; we take out (na matter whether by mistake or otherwise) American aieamen as. well as Engiiab ; we force them to fight on board our ships ; we punish them if they disobey. And when the^» after years of complaints and remonstrances, take up arm» in the way of reaistaoee, w^ tell them tiiat they ^ow themselves the willing, instruments and abettors of French tyranny. I wish mocutAj that this passage had been omitted. '-^ . There are other parts of the "declaratioh" tint I do not Uke i but this part appears to me likely to excite a great deal of ill will ; of iasUiig, of rooted ill will. 1 do not like the word <* pro/«s8$d" as applied to the American prmcipfev offrsedom t the meaning of that word, as here applied, cannot be equivocal, and assuredly would have been better left out, especially as we never see. In any of the American documents, any expreseiott o0 the kind, applied to us and to our government. But, to take soother view of the matter, why should hn Royat Highness expect the Americans to be disinclined towards France, because they profess principles of freedom ? Wl^ should he, on UHa atomnt, expect that thisy would lean to our side in the war ? Does the declaration mean to say, that the government of France is more tyrannical than was that n^orircby, for the restoration of which a league was made iDEuro(>e is the years 1793 and 1793 ? Froift its tone, tl^ declaration may be construed to mean that our go- vernment is more /ree than that of France, and that, therefore, we might have expected the Americans, who profess principles of freedom, to be on OMr side in a contest against '* Fremh ty^ rannif" Hem 1 mtim f well, well ! We will say nothing about the matter ; but it must be clear to every one, that the Ame* ricans may have their own opinion upon the subject ; and they may express it toOf until we can get at them with an ex officio* They may have their own opinion upon the matter ; and their opinion may possibly differ from ours. They are, to be sure, at a great distance; but th-^y are a readings and an observing^ and a calctdating people ; and I'll engage, that there is not a farmer in the back states who is not able to give a pretty good account ol the blessings of " English libertj/,** Besides, leaving this quite out of the question, supposing the Americans should think us freemen, and the French slaves, why should that circumstance prevent them from leaning to the side of France ? W hat examples of the effect of such morality amongst nations have the regent's ministers to produce? How often have 1 Lttters of William Cobhetty Esq. 138 we seen cloM alliances between free and despotic states neithor ftec nor despotic ? How often have we been on the side of des- pots against free states ? England>was once in ofTensive allllAnce with France ^inst Holland $ Holland and France agairtst England ; and it ought never to be forgotten, that Eni^and, nd many jeara ago^ favoured the invasion of Holland, and the stibju- gation of the BtateaxOeneral by a Prussian army. Have pfe not formed idtiances witli Prussia, Austria, Russia, Spain, Naples, and all the pettj princes of Germany^ against the repoblic of France? Nay, have we refused, in that war, the co<«>peration of Turkey and Algiers ? And as for the old papa of Rome, <^tfae whore of Babylon^" as oar teachers call him, his alliance has been accotiiit- ed holy by us, and his person an object of our care and protec- tion. Why then are we to expect that America is te refHlin from consulting her interests, if they be favoured by a leaning towwrds France? Why is she to be shut out from the Hjberty of formi^ connexions with a despotism, supposing a despotism now to exist in France? The truth is, that in thiis respect, as in private life, it is intemt atone that guides and must guide ; andj in my niittd, it is not more reasonable to expect America to lean on our sidef on account of the nature of the government of oar enaiuy,' than it would be to expect a presbyteriaa to sell his inigar to a church- man, because the only man that bade him a higbet- prfee wStS a catholic. Here I should stop ; but an article upon the same sub- ject, in the Morning Chronich) of the 13th instant, cMIs for ob- aervation. UfMn tihe falsehoods and impudence of the Times and the Courier, that is to say, the principal prints on the side of the Wellefi- ley party, and that of the ministers, I have remarked often enough. i was anxious to hear what the whigs had to say, slid here we have it. Mr. Ponsonby and Mr; Brougham had pledged therii- selves to support the war, if America was not satisfied with the repeal of the Orders in Oouncil ; and here we have the gfomds of that support. On this account the article is interesting, and, of course, worthy of an attentive perusal. *< Notwithstanding the tedious length of the papers on both sidet, the question between the court of London and the government of the United States is simply the rigki of impressment of seamen on board trending ships ; and this is, in truth, the sole cause cf the wa.. If we were to examine the value of this cause to the two par- ties, it cannot be denied but that to the Am£ric(ins it is exceeding- ly slighty and to the British highly material. The Americans cannot regard it as an insultt because it is a right which has been at all times asserted and acquiesced in by sovereign stales re^ spectively. Then, viewed as an injury ^ what is it? That they shall go to war to prevent British subjects, who have forfeited .their ^legiance, abandoned their country, and left their families. 'il "1 m m 11 "'if 124 Letters of William Cohbett, Esq, 111 ■>" J** i il probably itarving, from being impresBed on board their mercbant vesaela } that ia to say, they claim the right to afford an aayltitn and eotfiloy to the refuse of the British navy — men withont principle, for it is only the profligate that are likely to become the objiffcta of their protection. In this view, then, the point is of lltAe-cbnae- quence to the Americans ; but it is interesting to the British to a»* aert the power inherent in every statci to reclaim its subjects ; and the time may come when the principle would b^ equally im{>ortant to America herself. But, say the American ministers, it i« not so much the right itself, as the violent and insulting mode of exircisiag it that we complain of; for we have, upon reflection, agreed on the principle of international law, that free bottoms do not make free ' goods, and therefore we have no objection to the search bf dur merqhant ships for contraband of war ; but, in that case, whenever warlike stores, &c. are found on board an American vesseh,' she is detained and carried into a port for adjudication by a competent court. Whether the acljudication be always impartial or not, is another affair, but in this respect nations are on an equal footing, and these admiralty courts, well or ill conducted, are recognised by all maritime nations. But with respect to the impressment of seamen, the act is violent because summary, and because it is' subject to no revisal-~'to no adjudication-— and because the indivi- dual seized has no means of redress. By this sort of reasoning there is a tacit admission, on the part of America, that it is not to the act itsel/ which tbey object, so nnich as to the manner of tbd act ; and, accordingly, we see various suggestions made by the Americans, for entering into an amicable discussion on the meana of getting over the outrageous way in which the right is exercised, and of giving securi- ty to both nations against the abuse in question. On the other side. Lord Castiereagh declares the readiness of the Brilnh government to receive and discuss any proposition on this subject, coming from the American government ; though he would not enter into a ne- gotiation, a preliminary to which should be the concession of this right ; and so far we think he was clearly right. But is it not mon- strous, that two people of common origin, and of almost inseparable interests, should remain at war on a point upon which there ii so little difference between them ? Surely, without any sacrifice of etiquette on either side, the expedients might be canvassed by which this mighty cause of war might be removed. Let each Earty promulgate their thoughts on the subject, and if ther6 be an ouest disposition to peace, it must follow. The agreement ought to be so drawn as to make it most dangerous to the captain of an American sbip to employ a British seaman on board ; and, on the other side, to make it equally dangerous for a British captain to seize and carry off an American seaman, under pretext of bis being a British subject. Or, in other words, it ought to be made their interest to abstain from those two causes of national offence, ' K*(!!fi III hellers of WUlunn Cobbell, Esq. 12A V^ifioaa motleahave been sugge«(ecl for this jptirpostf. The moit «ffi«ct,ual Miuloubtedly would be to ordain, by a treaty, that the »ibject8.of each power, if found on board the merchant's vesaebi ot the other, should be coffs^d^red in the nature of contraband of war, inaamuch as their natural sovereign .was thereby deprived of theh service in war, and that that should be a cause to qetain the vess^ for adjudication* By this the American captain, or his owqers, would most seriously sufier by having British seamen on board; and, on the other hand, the British captain would equally sufier, if he had all the risk and loss to incur of an improper deten- tioRt Against this, however, the arguments are strong. The American captain may have been imposed upon by f^e similarity of language, &c* , and when brought into one of our ports, where there is a competent court to adjudge, the point, a real American seamAii might find it impossible to adduce proofs of his nativity. Besides, in both events, the penalty would be inordinate. Ano- ther suggestion has been made, that the British naval ofl^cer im* pressing a seaman on board an American vessel, and vice versa, should be bound to make a certificate (or what the French call proces verbal) to the fact, one copy of which he should detivetr to the American captain, and transmit the qihec to the admiralty to be.filediand that the seaman seized should have his action for damages in the court of law, the certificate to be produced by the admiralty as proof of the trespass, if the person can prove himself to be a native of the country that he pretended to be. We coif- fess we think that this ought to satisfy both governments, for this would make officers cautious in exercising the right, which, at the same time, cannot be safely surrendered." 1!|his is poor paltry trash. But it Contains one assertion which I declare to he false* It is here asserted, that '* the right of im- Ereasment of seamen on board of , trading ships, is a right which as at all times been asserted, and acquiesced in by sovereign states respectivdy P* . I give this an unqualified denial. I say, that it is a right which no nation has before asserted, and that no nation ever acquiesced in. Let the Morning Chronicle naaie the nation that has ever done either; let him cite the instance of such a practice as we insist upon; let him name the writer, every En- glish writer, on public law, who has made even an attempt to main- tain such a doctrine ; nay, let him name the writer who has laid down any principle or maxim from which such a right can possi- bly be deduced. And if he c^n do none of these, what assurance, what a desperate devotion to faction roust it be to enable a man to make auch an assertion. The assertion of the " value of the cause" being slight to America, in comparison to what it is to us, has no better foundation. The value ! what is of value, what is of any value at all, if the liberty and lives of the people of America ^re of QQ yalue? And when we know, when no man will denj", f r, f i'.B I 126 Letters of Waiiam Cobbett, Esq. when official records of the fact exist, that hundreds of native Aoiericaus have been impressed and sent to serve on board our •hips of war ; when this is notorious ; when it neither will nor can be denied} what is of value ? As to the proposition of making Bug* lish seamen "contraband of war," it is so impudeott it is so •haineful, it is even so horrid, that I will do no more than just nam^ it, that it may not escape the reader's indignation ; indeed, there needs no more than the reading of this one article to convince the A'uericans, that all the factions in England are, in effect, of one mind upon the subject of this war ; and I am afraid that this con- viction will produce consequences which we shall have sorely to lament, though I shall, for my own part, always have the satisfac- tion to reflect, that every thing which it was in my power to do« has been done, to prevent those consequeuces* -■*■ Wm. Cobbbtt. *» if Botlej, Utb XAnuary, 1813. ^ , AMERICAN WAIL ^ — U It will be useless, perhaps, but I cannot refrain from calling thv attention of the public once more to the gross delusions practised upon it by the hired prints, with regard to this war. At first they said that there would be no war ; that war was the cry of the mere rabble ; and that though Mr. Madibon was himself cor* rupted by France, the congress were not. When the congress met, they^ however, actually declared war. Then our hirelings told us, that the people were enraged with both President and congress, and (hat, as the election of President was approaching, they would turn Mr. Madison out, and that thus the war would be put an end to. That election has now terminated ; but until the ter- mination, or, rather, the result, was known, we beard of nothing but the certain defeat of Mr. Madison. He was sure to lose his election ; and, indeed, several successive arrivals brought us the news of his having actually lost it. To which was added^ that his rival, Mr. Clinton, had pledged himself to make peace with England. At last, however, comes the news, that Mn Madison was rC'eleded ! After this, one would have supposed that the hireling press would, at least, have kept silence upon the subject ; but, no ; it had still a falsehood left ; and it is now telling the peo- Ele, the *^ thinking people" of England, that, next year, there will e a re*election of the senate, when Mr. Madison will have a ma- jority of ten against him in that body, and that, in consequence of such change, he will be compelled to make peace with us. What a people must this be to be thus deceived ! And still to listen to cucb publications; aye, and to rely upon thei^ too, as int* Leliera qf William CobbetU E8q. isr flictUf ai if tiiey had alwayi ipoken the troth ! Notfiing can, however, be more flattering to the Americana than these 8tate< raenta* which ahoir how uneaay this country is under the war with them ; how sorely we feel the effecta of it ; and how anxious we are to get out of it. There is a coxcomb, who publishes in the Times newspaper, under the signature of VBTUS, who would fain make us believe that (he people of America, or, at least, the agrioidtural part of the population, are a sort of half savages. If Vetus had to write to them, he would not find many tools enough to tolerate bis sublimated trash. He imputes their dislike to Eng* Ush politics to their ignorance. He does not know, perhaps, (hat they, to a man, (if natives,) are as well acquainted with all our laws as we are ourselves ; that they know all about our excise taxes, and custom house taxes, and assessed taxes, and property taxes, full as well as we do; and that they know all about our law of libel, our sinecures, and our paupers. If he were to go amongst them, and to have the impudence to tell them that these we proofs ofcivilisa- tiont they would, or, at least, I hope so, make him remember the assertion as long as he had life in his carcass. The Americana have always had their eyes fixed upon us ; and does this foolish man imagine, that they do not know how to set a proper value upon oilr system of government ? When they come to England, as some of them do, they sometimes reach London by the way of Blackwater, where, while they behold immense places for the edui»tion of officers of the army, they see ragged, or rather na- ked, children tumbling along the road by the side of their chaise, crying as they go, " Pray bestow your charity ; pray bestow your charily .'" The Americans know how to estimate these things. They are at no loss to draw the proper inferences from such facts ; and it ia not the trash of Yetus about civilisation that will cloud their reasoning* The American farmers are great readers. There are absolutely none of them who do-not read much. They know^ that we pay more in poor>rates opiy, than double the amount of the whole of their revenue ! That fact alone ia enough for them. With that fact before their eyes, they will be in no haste to at> tain what this fop calls a high state of civilisation. Besides, as to ihefactf all those who know America, will say that the farmers there are a class of men beyond all belief superior in understand- ing to those of England, or of any country of Europe. They have plenty; they have no dread of (be tax-gatherer ; their minds are never haunted with the fear of want ; they have, therefore, leisure to think and to read. And as to what he says about their being absorbed in the love ofgain, the fact Is the reverse. They have no motives to acquire great wealth, other (ban (be mere vuU gar love of money, seeing that no sum of money will purchase them distinctiony seeing that millions would not obtain them a bo[t! from even a negro. ' i ■ ':'. }, I.!:: ■m n I i1 .■>."»■ - I '*JtBIII§ Ldiers of William Cohhett, Eiq. Thftt it a country where (he lenrant will not pull hit hat Off io bit employer, and where no man will condescend to call another man hi« maattr. Hence it is that the American farmer makes no very great evertions to become rich. Richea bevond hii plain wants are of no use to him. They cannot elevate hiiri \ they can- not purchase him stnii ; they cannot get him ctftw ; they cantiot obtain commissions or church ben^ces for hia sons ; they can do nothing for him but add to his acres, which are already, in most cases, but too abundant. He has, from these causes, much hi- mrey and that naturally produces reading, particularly when the residence is in the country. So that the half wild man, whose picture has been drawn by Vetus, is wholly foreign from the reality of the American farmer. The American farmer does not bate England. He hates a taxing system ; but he does not want war with England. He wants to have nothing to do with her; and though he hates war, be is more afraid of a connexion #itli her than with a w i- against her. He wishes to see all those who will be comiecied with her expelled from his country ; and, there- fore, he is pleased to see the makers of knives and coats rise up in bis own country. To bring about this, io create manufactures in America, was the policy of Mr. Jefferson ; an object which h^a been now attained, through the means of our hostility and of the revolution in Spain. The continuation of the war for about three years longer will for ever put an end to English connexion ; and thus, the grand object of Mr. Jefferson's policy will have been secured during his probable lifetime. This silly fellow, Vetus, ■eems to be wholly ignorant of the subject. He knows nothing either of the character or interests of the American people. He senselessly urges on the war, without at all perceiving the conse- quences to which it leads. He does not perceive that it will ef- fectually deprive our government of the power of again taxing the coat^ or the candlestick, of t!-e American farmer. He does not perceive, that it will stop from our treasury many millions a year. When he is talking o( the folli/ of introducing manufactures into America, he does not perceive, that that is the most deadly blow that the Americans can give to our taxing system. From the empty verbiage of this writer, who has been well termed an old ballereil luickf I come to something of more importance, namely, the debate of the 18th instant in the house of commons, upon the subject of the war with America. I, perhaps, should riot call it a debate, where, as to the only point at issue, all the speakers seem to have been of one mind and sentiment. But be it what it may, it is of great importance to the liberties of mankind ; and as such, I shall notice it somewhat in detail. Lord Cabtlbreaoh (aye, that is the man, Americans!) opened the discussion in (he character of Secretary of State of Foreign Affairs. This man's name is w'ell known to the world. This is now the man who, JUtUra of William CohhtlU Esq, \%9 He on8e< ef- (he not jrear. into >k}w the \ old ,the the lall it kers at it d as after Perceval, ii to maiotain the juttice and necessity of a war against America. The papers relating to the negotiation between the two coun- tries had been laid before the huuite ; and, in consequence of this, Lord Castlereagh, on the 1 Uth, brought forward a motion for " an ad vlress to the Prince Hegeut, expressing the regret of parliaaaent for the failure of the negotiation, and pledging themselves to a Mtaloua and cordial co-operation with hia Royal Higkntu in (Kt prosecution of the war^ in support of the rights and interests of Great Britain, and honour ofHi» Majesty^ s croma.*^ Thia motion was carried with a unanimous voice, just as similar rooLoiis used' to be during the former American war, when about forty of such addresses were carried up to the king. I shall now prc*ceed to notice such parts of the speeches as seem to me worthy of parti- cular attention. Lord Castlereagh set out with relating what had Jmssed in regard to the Orders in Council, and alter baring re- erred to the time and manner of their repeal, and to the pledges of support of the war given in case that repeal should fail of pro- ducing peace with America, he said, as it is stated in the report in the Morning Herald, that "he, therefore, now flattered him- self, that government woidd meet with that support which had. hem so liberally promised. If this was really found to be the case — if every attempt had been made that justice orforbearanct could suggest to conciliate Auierica ; and if, notwithstanding, she had issued a declaration of war, and persisted in carrying it on, aft£r the concessions that had been made, where was the man that could refuse hia assent to carry on the war with vigour adequate to our means ? America would thus see the united eflbrts of the country, and the unanimity of the house, that had been called forth by the line of policy that she had pursued. If they looked at the documents that bad been published by the American govern- ment as the grounds of the war, they should look at peace as an object very distant, because the American government placed the war on such extensive grounds as could not be removed by thia country.'* It is very true, that there were people in the house of commons who promised to support the war if the repeal of the Orders in Coun- cil failed to satisfy the Americans ; but I made no such promise; and, therefore, I, though a fly amongst eagles, am at liberty Xo express my disapprobation of the war. Nay, I most distinctly laid, at the time, that the repeal of the Orders in Council would not satisfy the American people. I had, indeed, said so many months before ; and I had said it upon a knowledge of the fact. That I all along said, that unless we ceased to impress persons out of American ships upon the high seas, we should have war ; and, therefore, when the ministry were, by Mr. Brougham, reduced to the necessity of repealing the Orders in Council, I| in an address ir 1 ^ ''' ■ ^ 130 Letttrt trine ; according to our own part of the correspondence ; no coof cession made to America. The thing is shown as clear as dajr light, in two words. We ail along avowed, that, in themulvet tofuidtred, our Orders in Council wf re a violation of the neutral rights of America ; but we asserted that they were justified by the violation of thos'* "lame rig'jts committed by Napoleon, and we declared that we % /Id cease our violation the moment Franc* •eased hers. France did cease : we had, according to our own declaration^ proof that France had ceased before we made the repeal. We then ceased ; but I put it to the common sense of the reader, whether this cessation ought to be called a conceaaioth Thus, according to our own doctrine; according to our own diplomatic correspondence ; according to our own more solemn acts, the Orders themselves, and the declaration of repeal ; accord' ing to all these, we made no concession at all lo America. Why then talk about concession ? It may have an effect hare ; but assuredly it will have none in America, where the government (a government chosen by, and resting upon, the free and unbought toice of the people) have constantly protested against our Orders in Council, as an oper. and gross violation of the known and acknow* lodged rights of America, and as receiving not a shadow of just^ fication from the violent and unjust conduct of France. To talk, therefore, of concessions, seems to me to be something intolera- ble ; but to expect that the people of America would, after the solemn declaration of congress to the contrary ; to expect that they irould disarm upon our ceasing to violate one of their rights, while a still more grave subject of complaint existed ; to entertain such an expectation as this, appears unaccountable upon any other suppo- sition than that of our ministers and members of parliament bemg wholly deficient in knowledge relative to the opinions and feelings of the American people, and the means of the American govern- ment. Besides, there was another consideration connected with the repeal of the Orders in Council ; and that was, that by the repeal we merely announced our intention to cease to violate a right. We said nothing about compensation for the past. This was very material ; for it was impossible that it should be over- looked by the American government, without an abandonment of all the principles upon which it had resisted the Orders in Coun- cil. I also pointed this out at the time, for which I was treated as a fool and a friend of France by a Scotch newspaper. The manu- facturers of Paisley will, by this time, have discovered, that I was a better friend of England than their impudent countryman, and that I foresaw an obstacle to peace which had escaped the eyes of both the parties in parliaiL^jnt ; for Lord Castlereagh now tells i ,1 I : : I, i';|a J-.iEia '% i''ji W^m m W'^'^M Ml'ii'^M ISS Letters qf William Cohbeitt Esq. us, that such compensation was demanded as a preliminary to s cessation of hostilities. '* The Orders in Council," he said, " wer« now wholly out 3f the question, by the overture for an armistic* on both sides ; but even on the ground of the repeal of the Or- ders in Council, the American government had pressed the matter ■o far, and in such a temper, as to admit of no amicable arrange* ment. Mr. Russell had put in claims to have indemnity Jor all captures made by^our cruisers under the Orders in Council since 1806. He did not say that tbiu miglU not have bnn given up, but, as the question stood, it evidently appeared that Auiericft r: had shown no disposition to be satisfied with the forbearance oi this country.*' Well, if this might have been given up on our side, why not give it x\\tai firsts and see what it would do ? How- ever, the demand was made, we see, and I said it would be made. The American government could not avoid making it, without ex> posing itself to the detestation of the people, as a base abandoner of their rights ; vwM^ so long contended for, and sought to be re- dressed by meauH ol sc many and such large sacrifices. Now, our ministers, and Mr. Ponsonby , and Mr. Brougham, ought to have foreseen that this demand would be made. In not foreseeing it they showed a want of knowledge upon ihe subject, and also a waul of knowledge as to the circumstances in which America stood with regard to France, from whom she was, and still is, demand- ing indemnity upon exactly Ihe same principle that she makes the demand un us. The reader cannot be too often reminded of the- orem and naitire of the Orders in Council. They arose, as we allege, out ot the French Decrees of Berlin and Milan, the twom places at which the Emperor was ^Len be s'gned them. These * Decrees violated neutral rights on tise se ^ ; but it was declared in the preambles to them, that this violation was rendered neces- sary by certain Orders in Council of England, which enforced a ?; greater violation of neutral rights. We, upon the appearance of these Decrees, issued other Orders in Council, enforcing other violations of neutral rights. Both parties were complained of by America. Both parties call their measures retaliatory. Both parties allowed that their measures violaied neutral rights. Both parties said they regretted that the measures had been ^urceci up- on them. Each party declared, over and over again, in the most solemn manner, that the moment the other removed or relaxed his measures, he should find a joyful imitator in the party declaring. America protested against the conduct of both. She said to us that we had no right to violate her rights because they were vio- lated by France ; and to France she said, that she had no right to violate her rights because they were violated by us. At last, to put the sincerity of the two parties to the test, she passes a law, which says, that if before the 1st of November, 1810, both parties have repealed their Decrees, their commercial and frieqdiy A.: I I Letters of William Cohhett, Esq, 19S intercourse with her shall continue : that if one party does repeal, and the other does not repeal by that day, then her porta shall b« shut against the non-repealing power in February, 1811. Napo* leon, in the month of August, 1810, issued a Decree, by which hit violatitig Decrees stood repealed on the 1 st of the following Noveni> ber. This new Decree was comoiunicated to our ministers by the American minister in London, who expressed bis hope that, agreea- bly to our many solemn declarations, we should hasten to foUovr the example of France. Our ministers answered in a sort of a Tague way ; but, at any rate, they did not repenl ; and in Febru- ary, 1811, the law went into effect against us. Our goods and our vessels were shut out of the American ports, while (hose of France were admitted. We asserted that Napoleon had not re- pealed his Decrees. America asserted that he had, but we would not believe her. We insisted that she did not know the tact near 80 well as we did. In short, we continued to refuse to repeal. At last, the great distresses, and consequent complaints of the manu- facturers, led to an inquiry, at the bar of the house of commons, into the effects of the Orders in Council, when such a mass of evidence was produced by Mr. Brougham in support of the pro- position, that the non-importation law of America was the princi- pal cause of those distresses, that the ministers (Perceval being dead) gave way ; and the Orders mere repealed* This is the plain and true history of the matter ; and I particularly wish the reader to bear in mind, that our Orders had, up to the moment of Napoleon's repeal of his Decrees, always been acknowledged by us to contain a violation of the known rights of neutrals ; but, in our justification, we said, that it was forced upon us by the De- crees of the enemy. This was our language up to the moment of Napoleon's repeal. But what says Lord Castlereagh now ? So far from acknowledging that the Orders in Council enforced a vio- lation of any known neutral right, he contends (if the report of his speech be correct) that they were founded on our known pri- mitive right. The words, as they stand in the report, are these: '* The Orders in Council had been a point on which consider- able difference of opinion in this country had prevailed, but thej had been abandoned, not so much on the ground of this country not having the hiuht, as with a view to commercial expediency. He rather wished, however, to waive the renewal of that branch of the question, now that the whole proceedings of government were before the house. With respect to the main principles of that system, ministers were still unaltered in their opinion, when the conservation of the country rendered it necessary to resort to it. At the time the measure was adopted, such a system was necessary, not only as it respected France, but as connected with thi soundest policy for the general interest of the British empire. ,;m A't .1 ■•■ 134 JLetters of William Cobbdtj Btq, !! 1' .' ! \V }. T^ad it not been for the manly resistance given by that measure to the power of France, France now would have been as triumph- ant, in a commercial point of view, as she was with respect to the continent. He begged he might always be considered as an admirer of (hat ayuUmJ" Now, I state that the Orders in Coun- cil themselves, and the papers of our diplomatic agents, and the speeches of Sir William Scott, almost explicitly acknowledge, that the measure was to be justified only on the ground of its be- ing a retaliation on France ; and that, in the two former is ex- pressed his Majesty's earnest desire to imitate France in doing away these obnoxious measures. This was the language up to the moment when the repeal of the French decrees was announced to us. Our language has, indeed, since changed ; and it was during the debutes upon Mr. Brougham's motions, coolly argued, that the repeal of the Orders would make the Americans the car- Tiers of the commerce of the world. But though we have changed our language, it does not follow that America should change hers. She always contended that by the Orders in Council her rights were violated ; she always contended, that all the seizures we made under those Orders were unjust ; and, of course, she de- mands indemnity for those immense seizures. But is it really so ? can it be possible ? can the thing be that a secretary of state has asserted in open parliament, that without any reference to the conduct of France, and that though the decrees of Napoleon did not exist, we had a rigid to do what was done towards neutrals under the Orders in Council ; and that, whenever we think proper, we have a right to do the same again ? If this be so ; if this asser- tion was rnade by the minister for foreign alfairs, and if it be meant to be maintained, then, certainly, the war with America will bu long indeed. Reader, what was it that was done in virtue of these Orders in Council ? I will give you an instance. An Americas-built ship, owned by a native American, manned by native Americans, laden with flour, or any thing else, the growth of America, and boimd from America to France, or to any other country, named in the Orders in Council, was seized on the high seas by any of our vessels of war, carried into any of our ports, the ship and cargo condemned, and the master and his crew turned on shore \o beg, or starve, or live and find their way home as they could. This was done in virtue of ihe Orders in Council, and if the re- port be correct, this is what we have a right to do towards neutrals again, "whenever the conservation of ihe country* calls for it; that is to say, whenever our government thinks proper to cause it to be done ! Now, I will not waste my time and that of the reader by any discussion upon maritime and neutral rights; but I will just ask him this one cpiestion : If we have a right 4o act thus to- wai(!H America^ whenever we thiok proper, ehe hieing at peace ■\ LeU&a of William Cobhdtj Esqi 135 der will to- ertcc witk lis, what tvM she lose in the way of trade, what can she risk in changing that state of peace for a state of war ? In my next I shall discuss the other points brought forward in this debate. Wm. CoBBfiVT* AMERICAN WAR. This war, which was spoken of by the hireling ns in the country ; the one that is in possession of the distribulcu uf the public money ; the whig faction ; and the faction of tiie Wellesleys and Cannings. The two latter would join if they could ; but each aims at the possession of the power of giving places and pensions ; and, in short, at being the ministry. These two, therefore, cannot agree wholly ; but they both attack, though upon different occa- sions, and different grounds, those who are in possession of the paradise of Whitehall. Amongst other objects of attack is that of n^ligenee as to the American mar. The Chronicle and Times are equally bitter against the ministers upon this subject ; they revile them for having plunged the country into a war with America without providing a sufficient maritime force to cope with that new enemy* A sufficient force ! Why, the Times newspaper spoke of the navy of the United States as a thing not worthy of the name ; it laughed at " Mr. Madison and his navy ;" it predicted that a few months would add that navy to oUr own ; it, in short, spoke of it in a tone of contempt which I should in vain attempt to describe* And yet, it now blames the ministers for not having provided a sufficient force to cope with that contemptible navy ; that navy, which was an object of the most cruel ridicule. The defeat and capture of the Guerriere, the Frolic, and tho Macedonian, must, of course, be matter of astonishment to thos who listened to the language of these presumptuous aud foolish meni but in what respect are the ministers to blame for it any more than they were tor the evacuation of Madrid, and for all the con- sequences of the unexpected retreat of our army in the Peninsula f The ministers had a great abundance of ships, of all sizes, on the American station ; and \ Vat were they to do more ? I recollect, and so must the reader, that at the time of the ren- counter between Commodore Rodgers and Captain BingJiamt the wordB in the mouths of «|1 thenc writers were t « Let one of our i'i ii.i u 1^ ll II 130 Letters of William Cobheti, Esq, I ; r:! 5 ik^ ¥RiOATEs meet with Rodgera, and rve ask no more.*^ This wish j this challenge, was repeated a thousand times over ; the public cannot have forgotten the fact ; nay, the sentiment was universal. Upon what ground, then, are the ministers now to be blamed ? Are they to be blamed, because, upon trial, it has been found that our frigates are not a match for those of America ? Are they to ba blamed, because they did not entertain a meaner opinion of our frigates, compared with those of America, than any other man in England entertained, or, at least, dared to say that he entertained? We are told by the writers in the interest of the two out fac- tions, that the republican frigates are bigger, longer, have heavier guns, and the like, than our frigates have. <' The varlet's a tall man /" said Bobadil, when he had been cudgelled. But are these new discoveries ? Were the facts not all well known before to all :, these writers, when they so boldly challenged out the American frigates to combat with ours? When Rodgers attacked Bingham, the size of his ship was well known, and particularly described ; and yet nut one of them called for heavier ships to be sent out to the American coast. Why, then, are the ministers to be blamed for not sending out heavier ships ? Besides, they have heavier ships upon the station, and it cannot be their fault if those ships do hot i fail in with the American frigates. What are they to do with our frigates ? If ours are unable to face the American frigates, what are, I ask, the ministers to do witt them? Are they not to suffer them to go on a cruise, lest they should fall in with a tall Yankee ? In short, it is another of the tricks of faction to blame ihe ministers for these misadventures of the navy ; and the attempts made by the ministerinil prints to account for our defeats upon the ground of our inferiority of forces is another of the means made use of to deceive the people, and to encourage them in the continuation of the war. I^i When, until now, did we think of disparity of force ? When, until now, did we dream of an English ship surrendering to a ship the superiority of the force of which it required a mintUe calcula- tion to show ? When, until now, did an English captain hesitate to attack a ship of a few guns more than his own ? Instead of all the calculations that we have seen in newspapers ; instead of those swelied-out accounts of the vast force of the American frigates, we should be plainly told, that we have now an enemy to cope with, equal to ourselves as far as numbers will go. Amongst alt the calculations and computations, however, that we have heard, I have not perceived it any where taken into account, that we have experknce, which the Americans have not. Where did Isaac Hull gain his naval experience ; and where did Decatur? There are two Decaiura, the father and son. T-hey were my neighbours in the country, in Pennsylvania. They were fanners more than seamen, though the elder went occasionally to s6a as ?hen, ship cvici' sitate ad of ad of rican my to Letlen of William Cohhett, K$q. i9r oominander of a merchant ship. If it be the father who has taken the Macedonian, he must be upwards of threescore years of age ; and if it be the son, I am >8ure it is the first battle he ever was in ; for twelve years ago he was but a mere lad. The fathe.i* was a man of great probity and of excellent sense ; and I have no doubt that the son is the same ; but, I'll engage, they both have had more experience in raising Indian corn than in naval tactics. Something, therefore, in our estimates, should be allowed for our superiority in point of experience. We have no officer of the navy who has not passed a great part of his life in actual service ; we have scarcely one who has not been in numerous battles ; and, in t4ie unfortunate cases above spoken of, one of the captains ap- pears io have been of loi^g standing, even in that rank. When we are speaking of the na%'al preparations of Napoleon, we always dwell upon the difficulty of his forming naval officers-^ but here we see, in the casQ of America, that that is attended Tith no difficulty at all ; we here see gallant and consummate com- manders start up in a trice ; and in a moment is dissolved the charm which bound us in ignorance as to this important species of information. The truth is, I believe, that amongst tiie first qualities of a naval commander, are sobriety, vigilance, and consideration for his crew ; and these qualities are within the reach of every man. The American government, too, has a wide range for choice ; with it, no intrigues, commonly called " interest,'* is likely to pre- vail ; because the possession of the powers of the state depend solely upon the will of the piople; and the government, having such support, is not reduced to the necessity of seeking support from any individuals ; and, of course, is not exposed to the danger of being compelled to employ, as commanders, or as offi- cers of any rank, persons not recommended by their own good qualities. This is a very great advantage possessed by the American government; an advantage to which, perhaps, it owes those successes which we so sorely lament, and which seem to be very likely to form an era in the naval history of the world. But let what will be the final result of these transactions, I really can see no ground for accusation against the ministers on account of the misfortunes that have befallen our frigates. Blamed they may be /(m* the ^var. There, indeed, there is matter for blame ; because, if my reasoning upon the subject be correct, they might have avoided the war without any dishonour to Eng- land ; but for this they cannot be blamed by those who are seek- ing for their places ; because some of those very persons were amongst the men who adopted and adhered to the measures which produced the war, and the rest of them have pledged themselves to prosecute it upon its present ground. Mr. Canning and Lord Wellesley were, ia succession, secretaries of state for foreigo 1« ■.'•:■■' '1' i; m 138 loiters qf William Gohbett, Esq^ affairs, while the dispute was maintained against the abolition of impressment of persons oq board of American ships. Indeed* the former has expressed his dtsopjpro&ah'onof the *' concessional^ as he calls them, made to America in the repeal of our Orders in Council. Of course, he cannot complain of the ministers for going

' langUijAci of the press. We could not believe it possible thatn go '*nm the whole of the oflScers of which, president and all, did naX n.ii ' from the public so much money annually, as one of our sine jure placemen ; we could not conceive that a government who did not get more money for iiselff would be able to get money enough to carry on a war more than sufficient to last our sloops for a few months. We have now found our mis- take ; and, indeed, the premises which we had in our eye should have led to a directly different conclusion ; for would not common sense have told us, that the less of the public money was taken by the officers of government tor their own use, the less of it that was devoured by placemen and by others for no services rendered the public, the more there must be for the government to employ in the public service ? Tiiis would have been the rational con- clusion ; but to reason thus suited not those who had, and who bave the control over ninety-nine hundredth parts of the press of this country. They, therefore, represented America as a natioti destitute of warlike means, when they should have made an esti- mate of her resources upon the grounds stated in my last, number. The persons in high offices in America are hadly "paid ; but (and the fact is worth great attention) those in low rank, or no rank at all, are well paid. The former have very small salaries ; their gains are much less than those of any considerable merchant or nianufacturer, lawyer or physician ; but the common soldier and sailor are paid at a very high rate ; at such a rate as not to make him regret his change from civil life. I should not say, perhaps^ Letters of U^illiam Cobbett, Esq. 139 ihat tlie former are badly paid ; because there is something in iht honour of high office which the common man does not enjoy ; and besides, (here is something due from every man to his coun- try ; and the greater that his stake is in the country the less is his right to draw from her purse. Mr. Madison does, I dare say» expend, as president, everj shilling of the 6,000 pounds that, as president, he receives. And whj should he not ? What claim would he have to the title of patriot, if he grudged to use his ta- lents for his country ; or, which is the same thing, if he refused to* use them without being paid for their use ? If such were his dia* position, what claim would he have to the confidence of hia fellow citizens ? But, with the common soldier or sailor, or other infe- rior person employed by the government, the case is wholly di0*er- ent. He has nothing but his labour for his inheritance ; he pos- sesties no part of the country ; his time is his all ; and, of course, he is paid for that at as good a rate as if he laboured for an Indi- viduah Those who speculate upon the resources of America should not overlook these important circumstances ; but hitherto, I aok sorry to say, that we have almost wholly overlooked them. I never shall forget the obstinacy of many persons with whom 1 am acquainted ai to the intention of the American government to go to war. They persisted to the very last, that it was impossible. They called the declaration of congress " bullying" f' they said it was *' all smoke,** and so, indeed, said the hired press, that vehicle of liea^ that instrument of ill to Englanr*. They have found some fire as well as smoke ; they have found that the republicans have some- thing at their command beside words : and when it is too late, I fear that they will find that this ]s the most fatal war in which we have yet been engaged < One effect of it appears to me to be in- evitable ; and that is, the creation of a navy in America. Prayi good hired men, do not laugh at me ; for I am quite serious, when I say, that my fear is that this war will lead to the creating of a formidable navy in America. The means are all in her hands> and her successful beginning will not fail to give activity to those means. A navy, a military marine in America, is, to me, a most formi- T^able object. Twenty frigates only would cause an expense to us of millions a year, unless we resolved to yield the West'arte : and as we firmly urged the principle of no peace with Bvorapartb, so, to be consistent with ourselves, we must in like manner maintain the doctrine of NO PEACE WITH JAMES MADISON. The reasons for this are twofold, as respecting this country, and as respecting America. A very little reflection will render them sufficiently manifest. In the first place, hatred of England is the fundamental point in the policy of Mr. Madison. He is the ostensible organ of a party, all whose thoughts, feelings, and sen- timents are guided by this master key. Some of the statesmen of this school have not blushed to assert in full senate, ' that the world ought to rejoice, if Britain were sudfc in the sea ;* if, where there are now men, and wealth, and laws, and liberty, * there were no more than a sandbank for the sea«monsters to fatten on, a space for the storms of the ocean to mingle in conflict.* Such is the deep-rooted antipathy which these wicked men have to the land of their forefathers ! With such men Mr. Madisoi^ acts ; and he himself, before the accession of his party to power, expressly lieUera of William CobbtU, Esq, 143 laid it down aa a principle, (on the discuosion of Mr. Jay'a nego- liatiuii,) * that no treaty should be made with the enemy of France.' His love lor the latter country, however, wag but an adjunct of the hatred which he entertained towards us : and he hated us for the very same reason that Buonapahtb did— -be- caune we stand in the way of any state that aspires at universal doiuiniou ; for, young as is the transatlantic republic, it has al- ready indulged in something more than dreams of the most umnea* Bured ambition. We need not here detail the long history of fraud and falsehood by which he at length succeeded in deluding bit countrymen uto war. Suffice it to say, he had two objects in that war ; first, to sap the foundations of our maritime greatness, by denying the allegiance of our sailors; and, secondly, to sei'ie 0u pur colonial possessions on the main land of America, leaving it to a future occasion to lay hands on our insular settlements in the West Indies. Perhaps, when he finds himself unexpectedly deprived of the buckler under which he aimed these stabs at our vital existence— the mighty Napolkon, the protector in pelto of the Columbian Confederacy — he may be willing to draw in his hornet and sneak away from his audacious undertakings. But shall we have the extreme folly to let him off thus ? When we have wrested the dagger from the bravo's hand, shall we quietly return it to him to put up in its sheath ? No, no. Mr. Madi* BON himself, in his very last public speech, has furnished us with a most apposite rule of conduct, which he cannot blame us for adopting, since he avowedly follows it himself — namely, that we should ' not only chastise the savages into present peace, but make » lasting impression oh tlmir fears,* Hitherto we have consi- dered the Americana as identified with Mr. Madison's govern- ment ; but is this the fact? Bo much the reverse, that it has been openly proposed in some of the states to treat for peace with Grreat Britain separately ; and they would act wisely and justifi- ably in adopting thia measure. The eastern states ; the most moral, the most cultivated, the most intelligent, the best in every respect, are at this instant reduced to a complete thraldom by the soutliem ^tUeSi under the forms of a constitution which the pre- vailing faction violates at pleasure. *The small states,' says FisHEH Ames, * are now in vassalage ; they obey the nod of Virginia. The constitution sleeps with Washington, having po mourners but the virtuous, and no monument but history* Our vote and influence (those of the eastern states) avail no more than that of the Isle of Man in the politics of Great Britain." If this was true before the annexation of Louisiana, how much more strikingly so now, that that addition has quite broken down all balance between the states, and poured an irresistible stream of corrupt influence into the channel of the executive ! What is very remarkable is, that the preponderance of the southern states is '111 I 144 LeUers of William Cobbetl, Efnj> chiefly owing to the slaveg they contain ! The number of rote* Vhich each slate has in the national government, is determined by the whole population. Hence, though the slave has no politi- cal existence, he gives a weight to his master over a free man in a different state ; and by another curious, but not uncommon para- dox in human nature, the slave owner there is generally a furioui democrat, and the democrats have hitherto been the tnost servile of the tyrant's adherents. Clear, therefore, is it, that the free con- stitution of the United Slates is either incompetent in itself to af* ford an equal protection to the wisest and best parts of the union' or else that constitution has been viola'ad and overthrown by th faction of which Mr. Madiboh is the ostensible head ; and io either case, the oppressed states would act justly to themselves to separate their interests from those of the incapable and trea- cherous individual who has dragged them reluctantly into a war no less inglorious than unjust. When we speak of these and the like crimes, as perpetrated by Mr. Madison individually, we only mean to use hia name in the common way in which persons in eminent stations are generally spoken of. He stands at the head of the list, not but that Mr. Gallatin may be more artful, Mr. Clay more furious, Mr. Jeffbumon more malignant, and so on ; and besides, there is a ferocious banditti belonging to his party, of whom, perhaps, he himself stands rn awe, atnl who, as they con- •ist of Irish traitors, and fugitive bankrupts, and swindlers, from all paris of the United Kingdom, may easily t[)e<;onceived to exceed^ even the native Americans in rancour against Great Britain : b the more shameless and abandoned the individuals are who co pose this faction, the greater odium must be cast on Mr. Madibor nimself, in the eyes of the moral and reflecting part of the Ameri- can population. It is a great mistake to suppose that the United States are wholly deficient in characters of this latter description* They have had many wise and many eloquent men, whose words yet live in the hearts and in the meditations of their countrymen. Sir. Walsh, the accomplished editor of the American Review, has attained a high literary reputation even 'm this country ; and though the late Fisher Ames (the Bvrke of the western htmiS' phere) is not so much know n in this country, he deservedly en- joys a much greater popularity in America. These, and many more such writers as these, have kept alive the fire o( genuine British liberty in the United States. Whilst, on the other hand, the miserable blunders of the Dearborns, and Hopkin«*b, ard WiLKiNr-^NS, and Hamptons, and all the long list of defeated generals have thrown a ridicule on that invasion of Canada which was one of the great baits of the war. Lastly comes the fall of Mr. Madison's grand patron, attended with the execration and, scorn of all Europe. Can we doubt that a vigorous effort on our part will annihilate the power of a faction aliks hostile to Bri' />/f«r« of William Cohhetty Eaq» 145 ri' flHH ftnrf fhtal to America^ h not the time propitious for winning at least the soun^ler and better part of the Americans to a union of interests mUh the country from whence they sprung ? It \* jmpoiiible to read thii article without being convinced that there are men who seriously entertain the wish to see America recotoniud; who wish to see our Iting restored in America, ai the Bourbons have been in France ; fur Mr MADisoif is the chosen president of the union ; he does nothing of himself; it ia the president, the congress, and the people, all acting in concert. Tet he is to be put down ; no peace is to be made with him an^f :nore than with NAPOLKotr ; tne government of the states is o tyranny ; the constitution is violaiedj or is inefficient ; its exist- ence is inimical to lasting peace i the time is pronttious for tv/n- ning the sounder part of trie stntest at least, to a union of interesiB with the country from whence they sprung. These are sentiments and declarations to begin with ; but, in fact, thej go the whole length of recolonisation ; and that is the project now on foot amongst the foes of freedom, who seem to be resolved to prove to US, that those friends of liberty in America who did not wish for the extinguishment of Napoleon, despot as he was, were not with- out sound reasons for their sentiments. They saw that, though he had betrayed the republican cause, if he :re put down, there would be men ready to urge projects of the description of that ^f which we are now speaking. This language towards the United States was never made use of; sentiments like these were never hazarded while Napoleon was in power ; but the moment he ig dowut these men turn their hostile eyea towards America, the only republic left upon the face of the earth ! Our quarrel with Ame- rica ceases with the war* There being peace in Europe, the quarrel is at an end without any discussions. But this writer passes over all the subject of quarrel. The American president and govemnunt are bad. That is now, according to him, to be the ground of the war; and we are to have no peace with them. I will pass over the impudent falsehoods which this writer utters at to the conduct of Mr. Madison, and the nature and effects of the American government; and come at once to what is most interest- ing to vm now; namely, first, whether a war for the recovery of the American states as colonies would be popular in England ; and, second, whether it would be likely to succeed. As to the first, I have no hesitation in expressing my belief, that it would be, for a while at least, the mast popular war in which England was ever engaged, the reasons for which opinion I will now state. In the first place, peace, re$il and lasting peace, and a vast reduc< tion of our forces, Would be total ruin to a great number of persons and families. All these will wish for war, no matter with whom, or upon what grounds. They will be for the war for thesame reason 19 ■: i:; ' i It .1 i ■ •li'ji 146 Letters of William Cohbett, Eeq* \l^ d y m that iuideit|kera are for deaths, and wUhout being, any nore than these, chargeable with any malicious (uotive. The farmers w.iU.be for war upon much the same principles; they being of opipioDi no matter whether erroneously or not, that war makes corn, dear. Here are two very numerous classes of persona. A third is the ^land owners in generalt who believe that peace will lower their rents without lowering their taxes. The ship owners and builders fear America, who can build and sail much cheaper than they (;a% .and who, if left at quiet, would cover the sea with their shipp. The great manufacturers ever will be for a war, likely, as they thinly to , tear up, root and branch, those establishments which are not only supplying America herself, but must, in a few years, eBpecially with the emigration of artisans to America, become our rival, and supplant us all over the world. . Besides, if America were to^be recovered, we should, they think, have a monopoly of supplying h%it. Even the stockholders, though they might generally wish for peace, might probably be persuaded that the recolouization of America would afford the means of hssenmg the national debt; that America might be made to bear a share of the debt; that the lands there might be sold for our account ; and, in shori, that this might be made an immense source of income, and an infauU)le security to the paper system. Of politicians there will be two descriptions for the war: one will see in America a dangerous maritime rival ; a maritime power which grows, like her own Indian corn, almost visible to the eye. They will mix this apprehension with the feelings of mortification and revenge arising from the naval victories of America, which are not be washed away by the fall of Napoleon, nor of ftfty Napoleons at his heels. These are honour- able-minded men, loving their country, not able to endure the ide however, will l^fkve them wholly without support from the people, when that pei|)le bears that the first consequence of that fall is a proposition in t^e Enj^lish public prints to treat THI^IR government as that of liappkon has been treatedt apd upon precisely the same principle, namely, that it is a despotit^nu As I said before, I trust that our government is too wise to be led to the adoption of any such pro* ject; but if they were, what could pur friends in America say ? They have been aaserting for years paat, that ows was the cause of freedom against a despot. What will they say if we make war upon them upon the same principle, and for the same end, that we have been making war agamst Napoleon ? By Mr. Jefferson and bis party it was always concluded that there was no danger to be apprehended (rom France under any circumstances ; and that if France, if the new order of things was subdued in France, Au>e< rica would be in great danger. Therefore, they always wisheda and they acted as if they wi^ied, that France should not be defeat* ed in the result of the war. It is in our power, by making peace with them at opce, and waiving all dispute abput differences that cannot arise during peace, to show them that their fears were groundless; but will they noi, «vhen they see th^ pft^f^ of th& Times newspaper, hold it up to the teeth of their political adver- saries, and say, *' look liere /" Here is the first fruits of the fall of the man whose destruction you told us we ought to assist in pro- ducing, and to do any thing, " in the upholding of whom, you re- presented as impolitic and base." This will be the language to those adversaries who will hang their heads with shame, unless the author of the Times cap make a shift, somehow or other, to con- fteUen (^WUliam CohhtHU Etq, 1# i«r- of Iro- |re- to libe }n- Vej to them a unall portion of his impudence. I think it ii clear, then* that the people of America would, in case such a war were to be made upon them, be united in 9 spirit of resistance ; and if thej were, I have no idea that ten such armies as all that we could ■jpod, well disciplined and brave as our army iSj w<^d j^ally suc- ceed in subduing and recolonising the country. * We might make inroads from Canada ; we might demolish towns upon the coast; we might destroy manufactories ; we might lay waste the cornfields, and bum iqany of the mills} nre might destroy all the shipping; we might tear the country a good deal to pieces ; hut I do not be- lieve thgt we should, even by adding another eiglU hundred miU lioHS to our debtf secure one single cohmy in the territory now qa||ed the United States of America. Yet, it is really true, ^at the enemies of freedom, while America remains what she now is, have gained nothing. Napoleon has been put down ; but then he was an enemy of freedom. He was not owned by any friifend of freedom. France was not a republic, nor had she a represenid' tive govermoent under him. The war against him was in the fWfiie, at least, of the people. The example so hateful to the ene- mies of liberty, of a people happy and free, without distinction of ranks, without an established church, without hereditary power or privilege <^ any sort, with a press now perfectly free, with legishtr lators and chief magistrates periodically elected by the people at large ; this example still exists, and the country is yet open to all the world ; apd to put down this example would, I am of opinion, cost us more blood and more money than it has cost to put down Na^r poleon. The enemies of freedom promised us peace durable^ if we got rid of Napoleon; but scarcely is he down, when they pro- pose to us a new war, more, if possible, expensive in its nature, and probably longer in its duration. Tc'Hbe sure, America holds out an alluring bait ; it presents employment for governors of provinces, commanders, postmasters, attorneys and solicitors general, secreta- ries, counsellors of state, taxing people, paymasters, judges, and a long and nameless list of hangers-on ; but, again I say, I hope and trust that the Prince Regent and his ministers will have too much wisdom to listen to any such mad and wicked project. It is impossible, however, for the people of America not to feel some alarm, and not to make preparations accordingly. This language of our newspapers is quite enough to excite apprehensions ; antl for this, amongst the rest, we have to curse a base and degenercite press. m . aii *(.' ;■ r m * ■ I I i ido idHtrt qf William CohbeiU Eiq» '"'^^'ffilt'VfV' AMBRICA. ''Hk article ivhlcb appeared in the Timrt newipaper of WonAhf Init, roakei me regret exceeOingl v that the Regent did not aniwer that part of the city addreia which exnrestiei a hope that ^* ai period iR pui to. the mvagn ^fwat ; nnd that we may henceforth iiHrticlpate In the aivamaigt» r/ a frimdlu and uniti/ettup'f cl tnitrtwiTik with all the nationii of tnt world" I regret that hia Royal Highneii did not upeaic to and echo thin aentimentt became the article above alluded (o atatei, that there is to be a itlpAlation «V the di^nitivttreaitf of peacet by which nil the allied powera, and France, are to hind tmmelvea not to interfen in tht war Whjich £nglaiid may carrv on against the United StdtM of America, ThiR article ia publi«bed ui dated, and aa having been pub- liahed, at Vienna. It ia, doubtleai, wholly /al«r, though It la veirjr difficult to account for ita being nubliahed in the capital of the Austrian government, whnre intelligence of this aort aeema so un- likely to be fabricated. Perhapa tne TimeA newspaper, which" has cried out so loudly for no peace with James Madimn, and' baa openly proposed to detach part of the states from the con- federatitin, has fabricated the article itself, bv way of feeling the public pulse. Be tliia as it may, the idea exists, and the prothul- {lation of it must have a very bad etfect; for though it is imjios- alble to believe that the Prince Regent would propose any such stipulation, there can be no doubt but the very mention of it in our prints will tend to make the Americana more exaeperated than they were before. « The etfect of this mischievous article would have beeoj by' anticipation, completely destroyed by a sin^jlc word from the Re- •^ent echoing the wish for universal pence expressed by the city' of liondon. I am aware that his Royal Highness, by a speedy adjustment of nil difTerenccs with America, which, indeed, do theinselves away by the existence of peace in Kurope, will greatlj^' disappoint the feeders o(i war and the enemies of freedom. At to tlic former, they micht be sntisfied with proBts equal to thtf profits of war; but the latter, nothing short of the exterminatiori of ijie very nauje of rfB«6/ic will satisfy. They see, In the exist- ence of the republic of America, danger little short of what ihey aaw in the republic uf France. They see in it a receptacle foi^ I lie oppressed an«l enterprising of all nations. They see in it an example of freedom, morality, and happiness, the bare thought of which put:j them tu the torture. If they could convolidate all the people of America into one carras^^, ttiey would, having an arm ti'jflit ienlly tttrong, and an arm suiliciently long, cut their throat al a &in^.ic gash. Such men, if n^en we ought to call such mom LelUrt qf William Cobhelt, U««. ^} iteri, tftlk with delisbt qf Iht Bending qf Lord Wellingt(m*» army to th United Mutes ; they revet in the idea »f burning the citiei fttid towiM, the milU and manuractorieM of that country ; at (he very least, they talk of forchig Mr. Madinon from hit aeat, ijld nef •modelling the goveruiueiit. Thev endeavour to excite all the hoitile pai«ion« here. They are alwayii ripping up our d^eated and captured frifgateat without appearing to recollect that we, at any rate, dyeated and took one Jrii^ate from the AnU' ficana. Why then urge ui on to revenge.^ Can any revenge that we can take do away thene pages of history, any more than the ^ethronnrnent of Napoleon can do away (he history of the battles of Austerlitz, Jena, and Eylaii? At other times they tell us of the danger which, as manufacturers, we have to apprehend from America, who is now, in her turn, becoming an exporter ofwoollm and of cotton goods. And why should they not export woollens and cottons as well as we ? What rcaaon h there that they should not become a commercial nation as well as we or. the Dutch ? These latter used to have, exclusively, the making of Oodii for the Portuguese and SnaniardH } but, for my part| I see no harm that would arise from it, if the Americans, who have such abun- dance of wood, were to supply this article to all the catholic coun- tries of Europe, as doubtless there will now be a great call for it» Seeing that the pope (to the great joy of this protestant country) is now restored to his See. But in spite of the justice and reasonableness of these senti- ments, they do not, and will not, prevail amnngi«( the manufacturera in England, who will look with jealousy and hatred towards Ame- rica; and perceiving no other way of arresting her astonishing progress in the manufacturing line than that of tearing her to piecea by war, they will be for war with her at any expense and at any risk. The ship owners know well that fhcjr ^ave no chance in a fair competition wUh the ilijiericans. They know that the latter can build, sail, and carry at half the price necessary to English ships. This class, therefore, will be for war. The mercantile marine will breed ships of war. This ia an object of terror with those who look far forward, and who are unable to support the idea of England ever, at any time, becoming the second maritime nation in the world, as in twenty years' time she must, unless the growth of the American naval power can be checked. When we look back to what America was in the year 1 r84, that is, thirty years ago, and see what progress she has made, and how that progress has gone on increasing in its velocity, it is impossible not to perceive, that unless she receive some very severe check, ahe must be equal, at least, to England, in naval power, even ia the course of ten years. This opinion is general with those who reflect upon the subject ; and, therefor^^, it ia not astonishing that spme, even good men, who do not hate freedom in the abstract. I km Till tb2 Ldtera of William Cohbetl, Sstf. shonld be ankious tt> see her growth checked, eHhldr bj ing her towns, her shi^ her means of strength of all soHs, or by* dividing her attUes. There are those, too, who, looking at tW fearful magoitude of our debt, and in despair of seeing it redticed by any system of economy, have an idea that it would b^ ai well to venture upon a war of conquest with America, in order to obtain the meabs to pay off part at least of this debt. They ne in thi^ boundless country lands to sellf and a great population to tajc,* They imagine they will find means as boundless as the debt itself^' and mad as the notion of a war upon such grounds may jeem to the Americans, they may be assqred that there are numerouii' persons in England who entertain it. Then think of the delightful brospect which seventeen or eighteen provinces hold out to the hunters after places ! Such cargoes of governors, commanders in chief, staflfs, port-admirals and officers, custom house and excis46 people, attorneys and solicitors general, judges, doctors, proctors, paymasters, commissaries, and though last, not least, bishops, priests, and deacons. Only think of this, and wonder not that there are persons who wish for the recolonization of America. But as the subjects of dispute with that country cease of them- selves with the war in Europe, let us hope that all these wil4'^ notions will be soon dissipated by the Regent's ministers, Who will, doubtless, lose, now, not a moment in giving real peace to the nation. I must confess, however, that I should like to see the ugly paragraph to which I have alluded plainly contradicted by something like official authority. It appeared in the Times newspaper of the 2d of May in the following words : The treaty ofClMumont is published in the same print of the same day, from the Vienna Gazette ; and after the treaty there follows, as also taken from the Vienna paper, this paragraph : " It is affirmed, that beside the conventions which England hat concluded with the other allied powers, it has also made a secret agreement relative to ISorth America. By this agreement Eng> land has procured from all the other European powers the assu- rance, that after the re-establishment of peace in Europe, none of Hum will interfere in the disputes between his Britannic Majesty and North America^ and France is also to engage, in the peace to be coiicluded, to subscribe to the same conditions.** This, as the reader will observe well, was first published at Vi* enna on the 9th of April, and accompanied the publication of the treaty of Chaumont. If the paragraph be not a fabrication Aere, it is very strange indeed, it being well known, that at Vienna the press is under a rigid inspection and control. Why any such stipulation as this? What need was' there of any, seeing that we have now no dispute with America, the very subjects of dispute having ceased to exist with the war in Europe. The dispute re- lated tp the taking of people out of Americao ships upon the high Lettm of truiiam Cohbeit, Esqi taa seM> upon the ground of being English subjects, and also to the extent of the right of blockade and other matters tomching neu- trals during war. Peace with all nations, of course, takes away the very subject of dispute; and why, therefore, should England have made a secret agreement, in order to prevent any of the other powers, France included, from taking part in this dispute, " after the re-establishment of peace in Europe ?" If I could believe, ais I yet cannot, in the existence of such an agreement, I should begin tu fear that (he regent and his ministers were bent upon a war of reco/o»t£tng', or at least of devastation, in the United States ; that they had listened to the suggestions of those who, for the sft< veral reasons that I have stated, desire the destruction or the con- quest of these states, and that we were doomed now to be eng&ged in a most expensive and bloody war, while all the rest of Europe enjoyed profound peace ; that the time was not yet to arrive when our burdens were to be lightened, when guineas ^ere to return, and when we were, once before we died, to say that our country was living in friendship with all the world. If this war were to be resolved on by our government, (which God forbid !) it must be confessed that there would not be want- ing the ready means of carrying it on with deadly effect. Wet have more soldiers, more ships, more horses, more arms and am- munition ; more, in short, of all the instruments of war, than we know what to do with. Our army is well disciplined j abundantly supplied with good oflBicers ; brave in its natdre ; accustomed to victory ! Our navy is in the same state. The European war has ended so suddenly, and was upon so large a scale, that there are provisions and stores on hand more than sufficient, perhaps, for a year's war in America. The undertaking, therefore, would be by no means chimerical, though, in the end, I think it would fail. If such a war, and for the purpose urged in our public prints, should be entered on, it is probable that the German legion, being sub' jects of our king, might be amongst the troops sent out. ^ This la no contemptible army of itself; horse, foot, artillery, engineers; all well appointed, provided, and commanded. In short, there will be no difficulty in sending out an army of fifty or eighty thou', sand men, beside sailors and marines. To prevent their landing would be impossible ; and it is hardly necessary to say, that the whole of (he ships of the states, and all the maritime towns, must fall upon the approach of only a fourth part of such an army ; un- less the Americans should, previous to its landing, be cured of their self-confidence, and lay by the plough for a while for the U8$ of the musket. 1 trust in the justice of his Royal Highness, the regent, for the rejection of such a project — but, if it were to be adopted, I know it would be popular ; and I also see, as every man must, that the powers of Europe, if inclined to aid America, are imable to do it) 20 'ifr .t !■ ,^1 U4 Ldlers of WUliam Cohbtliy Esq. They bave, all put together, not fleets enough to face six Englisb tnenof war. The maritime strength of the whole world now cert- tres in these islands. The 'Americans, I hear, rely upon the friendship o( Rua^'ia. Alas! what have //»ey to offer the etnpe- ror of Russia in return for his friendship ? This is ^ipusense. The emperor of Russia has other objects of his attention ; and, be* sideS) if we really were to give credit to the article from Vienna, that point is settled at once. Bo that if (his war were to be re- solved on, it would soon be seen that the politics of the federal- ists, as they are called, have been wrong from the beginning ; and that Mr. Madison, so often accused of being the tool of Napoleon, tvill havd to remind his antagonists, that if America, in good ear- nest, had taken the side of France a few years ago, she would not now, in all probability, have to tremble lest the advice of the Times newspaper should be acted upon. Luckily for the power of England, and for the family of Bourbon, Mr. Madison and his party kept aloof from Napoleon for the sake of a political princi- ple, united with tite fear of being reproached with plunging their country into a war on the side of a despot and a conqueror. But it would, if the Times* project were adopted, become evident to all the world, that such policy had been the ruin of the United States'. I repeat, however, my confident hope, that the regen-t and his ministers are too jtist and too moderate in their views, to listen for one moment to any such ambitious and sanguinary pro- ject, against which ;t is my duty to endeavour to guard them, as I know that there will not be wanting numbers, through the press and otherwise, to urge its adoption. The whole world beside does not, perhaps, contain so many deadly enemies of freedom as England alone. It is here alone where we see it recommended to keep the allied armies longer in France ; it is here alone where we hear it said, and see it promulgated, that Napoleon ought to be hanged with his code of laws about his neck; it is here alone where we see publications recommending to the king of France to jnmish the late republicans ; it is here alone where the press openly expresses its dread of the king of France being too lenient. This description of persons will never be at heart's ease while the people of America are free, and while America is a receptacle for the oppressed. And, indeed, upon their principle, they are rightf If they will insist upon regarding the result of the war in Europe as valuable only on account of its having destroyed republicanism in Europe, they are perfectly consistent in urging a war against America, and even a war of recotonization ; for unless that object be accomplished ; unless the cradle of the revolution become also its grave, little or nothing has been gained over the principle of republicanism. America, now holding out her hand to manufac- turers, as well as cultivators of the soil, cannot, if she remain what she is, fail to attract prodigious numbers of Europeans, of all na- w\ Letters of William Cohhetlf Esq. 160 tions, to her prolific and happy shores. Discontent at the chan- gea which have now taken place ; despair of ever seeing that which they before had hopes of living to see ; shame to remain on the spot where their hopes have been baffled, and their endeavours frustrated ; insurmountabie hatred of power to which (hey are com- pelled to submit, and to the support of which they are compelled to contribute ; the weight of taxation ; the spirit of enterprise ; the hope of bettering their lot in all: these will, if America be at peace, and the road free and clear, carry hundreds of thousands of Europeans to her shores. Artisans, manufacturers of all de- scriptions, and especially of the most clever and most enterprising .men. The augmentation of her population will be hastened ; her maritime and all other means will increase ; and it will be not at all surprising to see her, in ten years, in a situation to send fosth fifty ships of the line, manned and commanded as well as our own* - I confess that this will be the natural consequence of leaving her tvlutt she now is, and that iji any war at ten years hence, shes will be able almost to dictate to us both the time and the conditions of peace, there being a limit to our growth of power, and none to hers. But for all this 1 am decidedly for leaving her to herself. Her states may divide of themselves. That will make her com* paratively weak ; whereas, by a war, we should unite them much closer than they now are. We may, too, fail in the object of the wttr« After expending two or three hundred millions of money, we may be compelled to make peace with her as an independent republic, having greatly weakened ourselves by the attempt to subdue her, tarnished our own military reputation, fixed her fame forever in the minds of men, and what in the eyes of some per- sons would be worse than al( the rest, established upon a rock, never to be shaken, the principles of freedom and of republican government. I have thus taken a rather extensive view of this subject ; but to those who are for a war with America, in order, as the Times calls it, to finish the good work which so happily begun in France, it might have been sufficient to observe, in very few words, that our choice lies between these two things : either to suffer America to remain the nurse of freedom, the receptacle of the oppressed of ail nations, an example of liberty, security, and happiness, enjoyed under an elective government, without heredi* tary rights, or established church ; or to continue to pay the property-tax, and to see our debt yearly increased by loans. Here, Johnny 3ull, you have your choice. Which of the two you may take, 1 really cannot pretend to say ; and so upon ihis subject I must wait patiently the resultof your profound cogitations. As to the state of opinions in America, it appears that, having heard the low state of Napoleon's afliairs, the people there were counting with confidence on an immediate peace. They had not ■m '"'1 % ■% I'll -n 166 LttUts of William Cobhdt, Etq, it M then heard of the actual dethronement of Napoleon, and of the coniequent language of our public printa, accompanied with atate* menta relative to troops immediately to be sent off to America. What effect these will produce in the minds of the people and of the government there, I know not ; but so slowly do they gene* rally move, it is not probable that the troops will meet with any- thing like an army to oppose them. The Americans have no experienced officers. They have no discipline. They will, too* I dare say, think that, because they beat England in the last war, they can do it again, and much easier, having now five times aa numerous a population. But, in the first place, they will not have to contend agamst such gi^rals as they had to contend against before, nor such officers and soldiers. They will, if our troopa really should land in their country, have to contend with those who have defeated French armies; with skill ot all sorts; expe« rience in the men as well as the officers ; with courage, discipline, and the habit of victory. All these will require something more > than the Americans have yet thought of. Then, in the last war, America had three great maritime powers on her side, and one power to send her aid io officers and men. Do they now look for assistance from the friendship o( Ferdinandif or of LouiSf or of the sovereign prince of the Netherlands ? Which of the three do they intend to apply to ? Or do they expect that the emperor of Russia, who is shortly to come on a visit to England, will, in order to preserve their liberty, send an army of Cossack« to their assistance round by the way of Kamschatka ? Verily, Jonathan, if you repose in such vain hopes you are upon your last legs, if the project of our public writers be adopt- ed by the government. It appears that you have negotiators in Europe; and, I have heard, that they have a great opinion of 1^ 158 Letters of JVilUam Cohhettt^Esq. ) , V If', Ijr and presumption ! But it is vain to talk. This is a disease or (he mind, of which nations are never cured but at the cannon's mouth; and though 1 could wish much to see you cured, I can- not bring myself to approve of the application of the remecly*/ Since writing the above, the following important declaratidn froni^ oin* admiralty has come to hand. The Americans will, 1 dare say, not think it altogether a joke. « Admiralty Office, April 30, 1814. ' *'The lords commissioners of the admiralty cannot announce to the fleet the termination of hostilities with France, without expressing to the petty officers, seamen, and royal marines of his majesty's ships, the high sense which their lordships enter* tnin of their gallant and glorious services during the late war. The patience, perseverance, and discipline ; the skill, courage,i and devotion, with which the seamen and marines have upheld ^ the best interests, and achieved the noblest triumphs of the coun- try, entitle them to the gratitude, not only of their native land, * which they have preserved inviolate, but of the other nations of Europe, of whose ultimate deliverance their successes maintain- ed the hope, and accelerated the accomplishment. Their lord- ships regret that the unjust and unprovoked aggression of th,e American government, in declaring war upon this country, after all the causes of its original complaint had been removed, doeg'^ not permit them to reduce the fleet at once to a peace establish* ^ Dient; but as the question now at issue in this war is the maintC' nance of those maritime rights ivhich are the sure foundations of oiir naval glory, their lordships look with confidence to tj^at part of the fleet which it may be still necessary to keep in commission, for a continuance of that spirit of discipline and gallantry n h'.ch has raided the British navy to its present pre-eminence. In re- ducing the fleet (o the establishment necessary for the American war, the seamen and marines will find their lordships attentive to. the claims of their respective services. The reduction will be first made in the crews of those ships which it may be found ex- pedient to pay olf, and from them the petty officers and seamen will be successively discharged, according to the length of their services ; beginning in the first instance with all those who were in his majesty's service previous to the 7th of March, 1803, and have since continued in it. When the reduction shall have beer thus made, as to the ships paid off, their lordships wi'' their attention to those which it may be found necessar .p in commission, and as soon as the circumstances of the w a ad- mit, will bring home and discharge all persons having i. same fitanding and periods of service, as those before discharged fror the ships paid off; so Ihat, in a few months the situation of indi- viduals will be equalised ; all men of a certain period of service will be at libeily to return home to their families ; and the number LtiUraof William Cobbelt, Esq* ld9 I?) J wbicb it may be still neceasarj to retain, will be compoied of those who have been (he shortest lime in the service. An arraugement in itself BO just cannot, in their lordship's opinion, fail to give uni- Teri^al satisfaction ; and they are induced (u make this communi- cation to the fleet, because they think that the exemplary good conduct of all the petty officers, seamen, and marines, entitle them to every confidence, and to this full and candid explanation of their lordship's intentions. Their lordships cannot conclude without expressing (heir hope, that the valour of his majesty's (leets and armies will speedily bring the American contest (o ii conclu- sion honourable to (he Bri(ish inieresls, and conducive to Ihe laat- ing repose of the civilized world. By couuuand of their lord- ships. J. W. CHOKER." Thus, then, we have it explicidy declared, that there is to be *f AN Ameuican wah." Now, we shall see then, whether our ministers are to be talked out of their views, whatever those vieirB may be. The grounds of the war, on the part of America, were the invasion, as they insisted, of their neutral rights. The peace in Europe, I should have thought, put an end to the dispute, it t)e- ing impossible that neutral rights should any longer be. claimed. But it seems that I was deceived ; I must confess that the cry for war with America is general in this country, now that we have DO other powers to fight with, and the resentment of no one to fear. From America we learn the most surprising fact, that a law has ac- tually been passed to prevent the importation of either woollen or cotton goods from any part of the world ! Thus are eight millions of people, who only fourteen years ago had not a coat oi a ^own that was not carried from England, able to supply themselves ; and must, of course be, in a short time, able to export those com- modities, and at a much cheaper rate than we possibly can. Even ten years ago, America did not grow a tenth part of the wool suf- ficient for making her woollens. What a wonderful increase of means ! To what must such a country arrive in another ten years, if left as she is! But my fear is, that even here will be found, by some persons, a cause to make them wish for war. AMERICAN WAR. It appears from recent ofiicial accounts, that the Americans are in a fair way of becoming masters of Upper Canada, in spite of all the skill and all the valour which our little army has opposed to them. But the military events of the war are trifling, compared with a transaction just announced to us through the channel of the newspapers. We are told that the American general (Dearborn) ■m \ I 'V' h i ^^^h^bIRi yi' ^BEll i|^H|l ' 11 ■ 1 160 Letters of William Cobbttt, Es^ has committed to close custody tweDtj-seven British subjects, Id order to retaliate upon them in the severest manner, in case we, on our side, should punish naturalised cUisens of Americat when taken in arms by us. The article containing this intelligence, I copy, as follows, from thu Courier newspaper of the 31st of Julj last. "' New-Tork papers to the 30th ultimo have been received in Dublin, and one of the Dublin papers, in announcing their arrival, says, * Their contents are extremely important, but they are too voluminous for insertion in this day's publication. It appears that general Dearborn had carried into immediate effect the orders of le secretary of war, under that act which empowered the presi* dent to have recourse to a system of retaliation, in case the natte- ralised citizens of America should be subjected, when made prisoners, to the laws of a state which had exiled them, or which they had voluntarily abandoned forever. General Dearborn had committed, in pursuance of those orders, twenty-seven British sub* jects to close custody, on whom it was provisionally determined to inflict the severest retaliation ! Those papers likewise contain the official account of the capture of Fort George. They also com- municate some official intelligence respecting the attack made on the American army, on the 6th of June, by General Vincent. They say that the American advanced guard had been surprised, and that after a severe conflict, during which their artille:y had been taken and re-taken several times, they retired to ths main bcdy at Fort George.* Important, indeed, are their contents, if tiie o. -?'*'? cf the American secretary of war V uve been carried into effect in the manner they are said to havu >een. The American government here avow their determination to abide no longer by the public law of nations, and claim the power of dissolving the allegiance which a subject owes to the government of his native country. By the chicane of naturalizing our countrymen, Mr.' Madison converts them at once into American citizens, over whom^ it P'>sms, we have no longer any rights, nor they any duties to- wards us. They may take up arms against us, and if we diake them prisoners we are to indict no punishment on them ! They have aimed a blow — they have attempted the life of their mother country, and the parricides are to have perfect impunity ! A more impudent, monstrous, unnatural principle, never was attempted to be set up. But does Mr. Madison think we shall submit to it? We said last Saturday, and repeat it to-day, that * if Mr. Madison dare to retaliate by taking away the life of one English prisoner, in revenge for a British subject, fully proved to be such, being taken in the act of voluntarily bearing arms against this country, America puts herself out of the protection of the law of nations, and must be treated as an outlaw.' An army and navy acting against her, will then be absolved from all obligation to respect LeUtrto/miUamCobbeUt Esq, 161 the usages and laws of war. Hostilities may be carried on agaimt her in any mode, until she is brought to a better sense of her rican states have encountered all the inconveniences of a change of country, as well as all the well-known dangers of the seas, for the sole purpose of making their lot in this world better than it was before. This has been the motive of almost the whole of the emigrants from every country in Europe to the American states ; a motive wholly foreign from that of committing treason or any act of hostility to their native country. >^ The situation, therefore, of all these emigrants, is very different indeed from that of a man who, for the express purpose, should go abroad and take up arms against his country. Many and many instances are upon recdrd, however, of very famous men having done even this, without being accounted traitors. A very memo* table one may be cited in prince Eugene, the companion of the duke of Marlborough in his wars against France. Prince Eugene was a subject of the king of France, and, it is related, too, that he entered into the service of Austria in revenge for some affront or neglect that he had experienced from his sovereign : yet I have never heard that prince Eugene was considered as a traitor. It is very notorious, that in all the European armies there are men of all the states upon the continent ; that the army of Prussia, in particular, was made up of men of all nations. Our army, at this time, has in it Germans, Dutchmen, Italians, and Frenchmen. But do we consider these men as traitors to the several countries in which they were born ? Yet, be it observed, that they are not Eersons who are naturalized in England ; and it is very well Bown that they did not come to our country for the purpose of carrying on trade, or of cultivating the lands ; but, generally, for the purpose of entering into our military service, at the very time that we ar-e engaged in a war against those who exercised the sove- reignty in their respective states. In such a situation of things, it appears to me that we, above all the nations that I know any thing of, ought to be cautious (and I trust our government will be very cautious) in rigidly enforcing the law of treason, on the ground of unalienable allegiance. There ia no way of judging safer than that of making the case of an adversary our own. Let us suppose, then, that during the war in the north of Europe, in which the king of Westphalia is an ally of the emperor Napoleon ; let us suppose that a corps of the German legion, who are principally Hanoverians, and whom, I am extremely happy to hear, have been shipped off to be em- ployed in thai war; let us suppose that a corps of this celebrated Letters of William Cobbettj Esq. 16.? lej^ion were to be made prisomrs in a battle against the king of Westphalia} will the reader say that the king of Westphalia, thougn now the sovereign of Hanover, would do right in consider- ing these persons as traitorSt and subjecting thepn to the punish* meat whicn cur laws provide for traitors ; namely, that of being hanged for some time, cut down before they are dead, having their heads chopped off, and their bodies cut each into four quarters, to be placed at the disposal of the king ? Will the reader say that the king of Westphalia would do right if he acted thus towards a corps of the German legion ? It will be said, I know, that the king of Westphalia is a usurper, and that the persons in the German legion owe him no cUlegiance, Let us see a little, however, how this matter stands. The king of Westphalia does not claim the sovereignty of Hanover in virtue of any right of fureditary succession ; but he claims it in right of conquest ; a right upon which we claim the sovereignty over the thirty millions of people who are said to inhabit the kingdom of Java* It is very easy for us to call Jerome, Joachim, and even Na- poleon himself, usurpers. We do this in the heat of our animosity against them ; but aa we are here talking of an appeal to the law of nations, we should consider that that law makes the right of con- quest, as applicable to the duty of allegiance, perfectly equal with the right of hereditary succession. It is indeed notorious, that from the moment any portion of territory is conquered, it imme- diately becomes subject to the will of the conqueror, and that all the people belonging to it owe him . allegiance, the sovereignty of the territory being transferred, to all intents and purposes, along with the territory itself. Upon this ground it is that we, when we make a conquest of any island or province, issue proclamations, reminding the people that they now owe allegiance to our king; we command them, in his name, to obey all edicts which our ge- nerals may choose to put forth ; and in case of conspiring with the enemy, or taking up arms against us, we threaten them with the punishment due to traitors. To say that Jerome is a usurper in Hanover, may be very well in the way of talk ; but when Mr. Peltier said the same thing of Buonaparte, Lord Elleoborough, on a trial of the former for a libel against the latter, observed to the jury, that Buonaparte was the sovereign of France in fact, and that with the question o( how he became so, we had nothing to do. This is also the language of the law of nations. Cromwell, for in* stance, was a usurper in England ; but he was in fact at the head of the sovereignty of England ; and any Englishman found in a foreign army, fighting against an English army at that time, would doubtless have been taken to be a traitor. It may perhaps be said, that though Jerome be actually in possession of the sove- reignty of Hanover, he was not the conqueror of it, and that the territory has never been ceded to him by its former sovereign. It m 1 • -■' m 41 ^ ■ f \ ■Hpf :f:5-J 'X ) ■ 'If U! U , ■■(! Idi Xjetien of Jl^illiam Cobbeit, Esq. :' m may be further said, that we have never made peace since that conquest took place, and that i, struggle is still going on for the possession of that country. Whence it may be concluded, per- haps, that he is deficient in that sort of right of sovereignty which would justify him in considering the soldiers of the German legion jBts traitors. But, unfortunately for this arguoient, our own con- duct upon a recent occasion gives to it a complete answer. The king of Sweden did not conquer the island of Ouadaloupe. It was conquered by us ; we have given it to the king of Sweden, while a war is yet going on between us and France for the pos- Beasion of that island, amongst other objects. Will any one say that the people of Ouadaloupe do not owe allegiance to the king of Sweden ? I believe that no one will attempt to say this ; and then I should be glad to hear how any one will make out a clear and satiafactory distinction between the case of the natives of Gua- daloupe and the natives of Hanover. There are some persons, perhaps, who may think that the latter do not stand in the same predicament as ,the former, because they were out of Hanover before Jerome was made sovereign of it. I am not quite certain as to the fact ; but if it were so, it would not, it seems to me, make any alteration in the case ; for if a number of the natives of Ouadaloupe were to be found in arms in an ex- pedition against that island, they would, of course, be considered as traitors against the Swedish government, though absent from the said island at the time of its conquest by us. This is, indeed, an al>8olutely necessary consequence of the ddctrine of tmalterta' hie allegiance ; for hofw can allegiance be unalienable, onless it travels downwards with the actual sovereignty ; unless it descends to the successors in the sovereignty, be those successors whom they may I Allegiance can in no other way be unalienable ; for the sovereign may die ; his family may become extinct ; the laws may introduce a new race of sovereigns. Numerous are the in- stances of this sort ; how, then, can we pretend that allegiance is unalieoable, unless we maintain that it is inseparable from the ac- tual sovereignty of the soil ? These observations, which, in this comparative view of the matter, might be carried much further, are quite sufficient, I think, to make every reasonable man hesitate before he joins with the editor of the Courier in asserting, that if America attempts retalia- tion in the way above mentioned, an army and navy acting against her will be absolved from all obligations to respect the usages and laws of war. Such a man will, at any rate, see the danger of all attempts to justify the hasty shedding of blood on either side. I have before alluded to the peculiarity of this case. Wri- ters upon the law of natrons have never had before their eyes the spectacle of a country serving as a place of refuge for the distress- ed of all the other nations in the world. If the states of Americd Laters of tVilliam Cohbettt tlsq. 161 hftd been before them, there might have been found lome modifi- cations in their doctrine of allegiance. The states of America were colonies of England : the people speak the same language ; great numbers of them are closely connected by blood. The quarrel, in its indigested state, appears to the mind of the mua of people in both countries as a sort of family quarrel. A mechaniCf or labourer, born in England, and finding himself in America, h*a entered into no reflections as to any transfer of allegiance. He takes part with the country in which be is, with no thought about committing treason any more than the inhabitants of the villages of Botley and Bishop's Waltham think about treason in their bat- tles about roads. It is very different, indeed, where Englishmen join Frenchmen, or Frenchmen join Englishmee, against tbdr na- tive countries respectively. ' The editor of the Courier speaks of British subjects in the American army as having attempted to take the life of their mo- ther country^ and calls them " parricides !" He does not consider that the far greater part of thesrj soldiers might have been mere children when they left this country. I have seen hundreds of children (I might say thousands) land in America with their emi- grant parents; and if either of these were to be found in arms in the American army, Gghting against us, would he have him hanged, his quivering bowels torn out, his head chopped off, and body hacked in quarters, for the offence ? Unjust and merciless as hire- ling scribes generally are, I hardly suppose that the man will go this length. Yet this length he must go, if, in the present case, he justifies our acting upon the abstract doctrine of unalienable allegiance. It should be considered that our own laws make exceptions as to allegiance. An American may become a British subject by marrying an English woman. From the time he so marries, the law gives him the claim to all the rights enjoyed by Englishmen ; and the same law imposes upon him all tho duties of an Englishman. This law, of which no gentleman can be ignorant, has been not long ago acted upon by our government, as I under* stand, in this way : An Asierican was iippressed in our fleet ; he was claimed by the agent of the American government, as an American, and his discharge demanded accwdingly. The answer was, that he was a ^British subject, having married an English woman ; and the demand of his discharge was refused accordingly. The law, I believe, is, in this respect, the same in America ; and, indeed, those who have been acquainted with the American women, will, I imagine, see no reason why this species o( petticoat natural- isation Should not be going on there as well as here. Indeed, the law is the same in France as to this matter ; upon the princi[de, I suppose, that, as all good husbands suffer themselves to be ruled by their wives, and as the women are, for the far greater nart, most loyal subjects, and most immovably attached to the exi ing order Uii ^'%' M % ■ '4 ■ft :| i:-^ ■$': h! m m m :i!^. .i ■i:i ...J 161 Later$ of WUlim Cohbtttf E$q. ■ I Mil, m u ii< of thingBf bt it wbst it may, a foreigner, wlien be marriei a nativCf may be fairly looked upon ai having become bone of tbe bone and fleih of the flesh of the government itself. Whatever be the reason of this amusing exception to tbe gene- ral doctrine, it ia vwy certain that it gives a furious blow to tbe doctrine itself; for here we see, that we oureelves contend that allegiance »», in this case, alienable; and how are our generals in Canada to tell whether the British subjects) of whom they make prisoners, have or h»v@ not married American wo- men? So that, before we rush on hastily to the conclusion which this impudent scribe would have us adopt; before we give our assent to th«i hanging and cutting up carcasses, upon the ground of the doctrine of unalienable allegiance; before we give our unqualified approbation to the sentiment (hat America is become an outlawt and that ropes and ripping knives, and axes and gibbets, ought to make part of our weapons in a war against her ; before we suffer ourselves to be thus steeped in the blood which this man seems so anxious to see shed, you see, reader, there are good reasons for us to hesitate and reflect* This savage man, who really seems to have dipped his pen in blood, has, in all hu- man probability, never beard of that law of our own, which sub- joins the rights and duties of allegiance to the act of marrying a native woman; and, perhaps, if he had, he would not have cared much about the hanging and quartering of native Americans, married to ^^Inglish women, and taken in arms in either service ; for you will observe, reader, that the comfort of such a man's situ- ation is, that he is a traitor, if found in ajrms on either side* If we catch him fighting against us, we hang him and cut him up, because he is the king's subject, from having married an English noman* If tbe Americans catch him fighting against them, they put him to death, (for I believts they stop here,) because he is a ffioftve of America. So that, at this rate, he who marries a foreigner must take good care that he go not to the wars. This hanging and quartering editor would, to all appearance, care but little about the fate of Americans who should fall in this way ; but I beg leave to remind him, that there are some British sub- jeds who have had the indiscretion to marry American women. Aye, and what is more, some of these are officers, and of no mean rank and estimation, in our navy and army ! At this moment a great number does not occur to me ; but there are Admiral Knightt Sir Alexander Cochrane^ and Sir Thomas Hardy ^ who, unfortunately (according to this man*s noiion) for them, have mar- ried American women. To be sure, one may rather pity than blame them ; for to go to America without a wife, and come away unmarried, argues that a man is not made of flesh and blood. Now will the reader say, that if either of these gallant officers, to whom, if I had time for inquiry and recollection, I could, I doubt not, LMert of Wiiliam CobbeH, Etq, \ 167 add a couple of icore ; will the reader lay that if either of them were made prisoner by the Americaoii theae latter would have a right to consider him as a Iraitor ? Yet if this doctrine of unalienable allegiance, as applied to the American soldiers, is to be received ' without any modificatioii» why should not these oflScers, in such case, be considered aa traitors, and treated as such ? Agaiii< as to thUArta., is there not another great exception to this law of unalienable allegiance I A son, born in a foreign country, of English parents is an JEnglMft stil^ect.'* And I beg the reader to observe that the rights and the duties of allegiance u:'e insepttrabU. Such a son, though born in America, according to this doctrine of unalienable allegiance, ia liable to be hanged and cut to pieces if found in the army of his native country fighting against us. And on the other hand, If found in our army fighting against America, is liable to be hanged as a traitor to her. How many hundreds, how many thousands, how many hundreds of thousands, of men and boys are in this pre- cise predicament ! I could name hundreds that I myself personal- ly know, nay, (and surely it is enough to make me speak feeling- ly !) the very youth who, from my dictation, is putting this iden- tical article upon the paper, would, if he were made prisoner, in fighting against the Americans, be liable to be considered a traitor to the country in which he was born, and to expiate his crime on the gibbet. Verily, then, we shall do well to pause and reflect before we give into these savage and bloody notions, the offspring, not of patriotic feelings, not of zeal for the honour of the country; but of low, base, disappointed malice, coupled with a hatred of every human being that is in the pursuit or enjoyment of freedom* I do not know what is the real state of the facts ; I do not know what number of naturalized American citizens, natives of this country, * There U a ourioai distinction mtde by our law with regard to the ehildre^, bom abroad, the parent* being lubjeots of the king. It relates to the capability of holding plaees of profit or trust, or of pensions under the crown. If the parents be eitlier Scotch ot Jriih / or if either father or mother be Scotch or Iritn, none of their children can ever, aeeordins; to law, hold any suuh place or pension ; but if the parents be EngUih, then the children may hold such places ur pensions I have often thought of availing mrself of this law, and of going and routing^ out of thesr r laces and pennons all the Scotch and Irish eoming under this de:I get a little lei- sure, after the harvest is all in, go and thrast out these illegal intfuders, of which I have not the least doubt that I shall find a pretty swarm ; for I have obseiTed that these gentlemen of equivocal allegiance are verv remarkable for their enterprising ■iNrit, whtre there is any ohanee of getting at the public money. V If! \^1 I'. % m m\\ i: IM Letters qf William Cobbett, EtqA h {if we may have taken io arms ; nor do I know that our generals have iexpressed an intention of considering them as traitors ; but if they have taken any such persons, and have expressed any such in< tention, the arguments which I have offered, are, I think, quite sufficient to induce our ministers to make these generals hold their hand, I by no means approve of that loose way of thinking, with regard to the duties of a subject or a citizen, which would dissolve all the ties of allegiance, and justify men, at their mere will and pleasure, to join the enemies of their country, and make war against her; I approve of no such wild notions, which must, iq the end, lead to the most miserable of consequences, eradicating from the mind of maa every sentiment connected with the love of country ; but in this particular case, this case of which the his> tory of the world presents us no precedent, and under all (he cirr cumstances, some of which I have mentioned above, of the organ* ication of our own army, I am decidedly of opinion, that to attempt to act towards persons taken io the American army rigidly upon the doctrine of unalienable allegiance, would be a step of which we should in a short time most sorely repent. All the world must see, at the first blush of the question, that« the Englishmen taken in the American army stand upon a very different footing from Englishmen who should be taken in a French army. It is not a question that waits for reasoning — it is one that rushes at once to the heart — which tells every man that these per- sons, though we may lament that they are there, are not deliberate traitors. The far greater part of them must, according to all pro- bability, be of nearly the same description, as to education and situation in life, and also as to degree of information, as the sol- diers of our army ; and I put it to the reader's candour to say, whether, if any of the men (I mean the common soldiers) who iiave so gallantly fought for their country in Spain, had been in America, they would have thought it treason to enter the Ame- rican service, especially after residing many years in that country ; having tbrmed entirely new connexions, and perhaps hardly recol* lecting the place they were born, in England, Ireland, oi* Scot- land ? To apply the maxims of the law of treason, grounded on the doctrines of unalienable allegiance, to men so circumstanced, bj| I am very 9^re, to stretch it farther than the common sense of mankind wilF approve of; and, therefore, I cannot refrain from again expressing an anxious wish, that our ministers will interpose their authority to put a stop to, any further prosecution of any such attempt. It is not impossible, though 1 do not think it very likely, that some few of those persons who have gone from i^his country, or who may be said to have fled from this country on account of their political opinions, may have been found in arms against their na- tive country. On their part, there would be no excuse on the Letters of William Cohhett, Esq. tea ■core of wiint o/informationt but surely, after being so frequently told by the hirelings of the day that it would be a good thing if they were to leave England — after hearing for many years among the loyal elect, the toast of " Old England~-^nd those mho do not like the country let them leave it ;** after hearing a member of parliament, in his place, exclaim, " Those who do not like the country, damn theitit let them leave it" — after having so long beard themselves thus abused, and thus bidden to go out of the country, surely, even these men must be very much surprised, at least, to find themselves accused of a failure in their duties of aU legiance. There appears to me, too, to be a good deal of impolicy in making all this fuss about traitors found in the American army or navy. If the facts have been true to the extent in which they have been stated in the newspapers, and which I do not believe, it seems that there was no great wisdom discovered in the divulging of them. I think that if I were a minister I should do every thing in my power to keep such facts from being promulgated ; for, after all, what can possibly be gained by it ? If twenty or thirty of the men thus taken were put to death, and if no retalia* tion were to take place, (as I hope it would not,) what should we gain ? We might prevent some few British-born subjects from en- tering the American service, but America has quite men enough without them ; men, too, upon whom she can as safely rely. And we should only blazon through the whole world the melancholy fact that, for some reason or other, there were Englishmen ready to take up arms against their country, and in that case, not only to encounter all the dangers inseparable from war, but in addition thereto, the risk of being hanged, ripped up, and chopped to pieces ! And would this be a desirable thing ? Would it be to our honour to cause this fact to be known in every town, in ever/ village, in every house, in every hovel throughout the civilized world? Say, for mere argument's sake, that this terrible act would be consonant with strict justice-.-8ay, for argument's sake, that all the reasons which I have urged against it, and which, ia abler hands, might have been urged with much greater force and effect — say that all these reasons are totally devoid of weight, still, tell me where is the policy of thus astounding the world into the knowledge of a circumstance so little calculated to impress mankind with a favourable opinion of our character? If it be urged that the evil is of such a magnitude as to call for the contem- plated act, even at the risk of national character, to what a la- mentable state must we have arrived ! But t contend that, be the magnitude of the evil what it may, it is impolitic to adopt the measure to which the ministers are encouraged by this malignant and savage writer ; for it is easy to perceive, I think, that such a measure must give rise to a conviction in the mind of every BiiJt^ 22 ^ni M ■■'(• .,)*'; '■t i i m 'Mi 'm r no LeHtra qf milium CobbOt^ Esq. ■ubject in America, that the only way to ensure bis safety againaC the ciaima of England, is to effect the total destructbn of thai power by which alone those claims can posaibly be enforced. AMERICAN WAR, , ,1 w Ih' if, We have now the Gazette account of the battle of Chippewa, and also the American account of that memorable and important contest. I guessed our force at about three or four thousand men; and it appears now that it did not amount to three thousand, out of which we lost in killed, wounded, missing, and prisoners, u7a! The Americans say that their force was inferior to ours. They state that they have eigMeen of our (^cera prisoners ; and their account agrees with ours as to the numbers that they took in the battle. Our Gasetle says that we took ** teveral hundreds of prisoners.''* But why have we no detail ? why no detailed list oC what we have captured ? Surely, several hundreds are soon count- ed. A thousand sheep, spread over a field, are counted in ten minutes. These omissions look suspicious. It is certain, how- ever, that the Americans did reirefU with the prisoners they had made, and that they had to contend with a most gallant enemy. Numerous as were the battles of Napoleon, and brave as were his soldiers, I do not believe that even he, the greatest warrior that ever lived, can produce from his wars an instance of a contest so well maintained, or, in proportion to the numbers engaged, so bloody f as this of Chippewa. Our own account tells us that our first in command was severely moundedt our second in command severely womidedf and taken prisotur} and when we come to see the American account, we find that their ^rsf and second in com- mand were both so severely wounded, that neither was able to write or to dictate a despatch t» the government, several days after the battle. Yet we find that this little band of ram troops, (as the Americans must be,) though really left without heads to direct them, took off the cannon and the prisoners that they had captured during the engagement. It appears from general Drum- mond*8 account, that the cannon of the two armies were run up to each others* muzzles ; that the fight was so very clos^, and the confusion so great, that the Americans, in one instance, put their horses into the limbers (or shafts) of our cannon, instead of the shafts of their own ; and that the Americans cut down our artH' krymenfrom the very sides of our guns. The MQining Chronicle expresses its great stUisfactiont that the expedition has, at last, sailed from Portsmouth to America. A few more battles like that of Chippewa would cause this organ of the wh^s to change its tone. As I said before, it does appear LeltenofWmiam ^ohbelt, Eeq^ in that fhe Atnericani, after (he battle, retired some miles ; and lo does an araiy tery often, when it has been aucceosfnl. Ho«r many victories^ good God ! did we win in Portugal and Spahi without stopping an hour on the field of battle, but retreating from h with all possible speed ? Did we not win a mwt gloriotis vutorif at Corunna ; and did we not instant! j embark, in the utmost con- fusion, leaving the town to the beaten enemy ? Did we not win a still more glorious victory at Talavera, which earned the winner a Htte ; and yet, did we not leave even our own wounded to the humanity of Napoleon's gallant army ? Now the Americans, though they retired, they retired with our second in command, and a great many other prisoners. Why, therefore, may they not, in fact, have been the victors, if we were the victors at Corunna and Talavera ? But it is of little consequence who reaHy gained the victory. The important fact is, that we have now got an enemy who fights as bravely as ourselves. For some time the .Americans cut no figure on land. They now have proved to ua, ^Hhat they only wanted time to acquire a little discipline. They *have now proved to us what they are made of; that they arc the ' aame sort of men as those "who captured whole armies under Bur- ^yne and Comwallis ; that they are neither to be frightened nor aedoced ; and that, if we should beat them at last, we cannot expect to do it without expending three or four hundred millions of money, keeping up all our present taxes, and adding to their Amount, or imposing new taxes. These are the facts that are now proved to us ; these are the natural consequences of battles such as that of Chippewa. It has tieen stated in the newspapers, that admiral Cochrane has taken Baltimore, the capital of Maryland ; that Stonington has been demolished; that we are about to attack New- London; and, therefore, says the writer, Jonathan must look sharp about hhn. Baltimore is hardly taken, and will, I dare say, never be taken, without a most bloody contest. But supposing it to be so ; for our ships of great size can go quite up to the city, unless pre- vented by batteries on shore ; suppose the fact to be true, how ' are we to maintain that position ? And if we could maintain it for ft year, how much nearer are we to our object ? Baltimore is ex- posed to our attack, from its vicinity to the sea, and from the im- mense river that opens the way to us to reach it. But what is that place, or even all the state of Maryland, when we are talking of this great republic, inhabited by free men resolved lo defend their country T From the first, it was allowed by me that we should do immense mischief; that we might burn many villages, towns, and cities, destroy mills and manufactories, and lay waste lands upon the coast, to the great loss and distress of numerous indivi- duals. But at the same time I anticipated, that these acts would opiy tend to unite the Americans, and, in the end, produce such »r' ■ M I i i V: I 172 Ldlera of miliam Cohhtlt, Esq. l|i 1 1, «■,.•. HI J L ' . I h ' ;i I a hatred against us, as would not only render final luccera impos- sible, but as would tend to shut us out from all future connexion and iatercuurse with that great and fertile region. There seemed to be Vantint; juat such a war as this to complete the separation of Enghnd from America ; and to make the latter feel that she had n(* safety against the former, but in the arms of her free citizens. We were told, as the reader will recollect, that the eastern staieM would, in case of war, separate themselves from the rest of the union, and join themselves to us. But it now appears that our first grand stroke of destruction was given in these our favourit«o states. Stonington^ we are told, is demolished; and Nerv'ttondonU is, we are told, about to share the same fate. These places lie in^i our favourite state of Connecticut, in the midst of the eastern states, who were to join us against their own republican governr ment ! This fact is, of itself, sufficient to overset all the stories about a separation of these states. These states now see what they have to expect at our hands ; and, indeed, they did not want to see their towns destroyed, in order to be convinced that their safety lay in their firm obedience to the union, and in the resolution to stand by their own government. It is, I supposdv intended to batier them into a separation ; but who is fool enough to believe that such a mode will succeed with such a people ? The demolition of Stonington will, in all probability, render the name of England so hateful in our favourite states, that no man will dare to raise his breath in defence of her conduct. If we bad confined our land war to Canada, it is possible that Mr. Madison might have found it very difficult to make the people see how they were interested in the contest ; but the moment we showed our design of carrying fire and sword along the whole coast of the United States, that moment we bound the whole of the people up like the bundle of sticks described in the fable ; especially as the manifestation of this design was accompanied, on the part of al» most the whole of our public prints, with the open declaration that it was necessary, now that we had the opportunity to subju- gate America, to counter-revolutionize her, to destroy her go-* vernment, to reduce her to her former state of dependence on us. It is of great importance that we bear in mind, not only these de- clarations, but aUo the lime when they began to be made. While the duration of the power of Napoleon was not doubted ; as long as there appeared to be no prospect of seeing him put down, a sort of ambiguous language was held as to the object of the war with America. Mr. Madison was accused with being a friend to Napoleon ; he and his countrymen were abused ; but nothing was distinctly said as to the object of the war. As the • affairs of Napoleon grew gloomy, onr prints, from time to time, grew high in their language as to the object of the American con* test; and when Napoleon was actually put down, they threw of[v^ LelUn qf miliam CobbeU, Etq. iia * ut of a e, all reierve, and in the moit diatinct termi, with an air of official authority, they informed ua that we were not to lay down our arma till we had effected in America rvhut had been effected in France, The government, we are told, waa to be done away. Mr. Madi* aon was to be deposed, as Napoleon had been. Our army, then in France, were to do in America what they had just done in ''i^rance ; that is to say, they were ** to deliver the Americana ("rom an oppressive timrpaliont and reatore them to their ybrm^r happy connexion with a paternal government." These declara- tions were, at the period i allude, daily made in the Times and the Courier. Nay, it is only a few days ago that the Times news- Saper, in expressing its regret that the sovereign prince of the Netherlands had sent an ambassador to America, observed, that if he had stopped for a few months, he might have been spared the disgrace of sending an ambassador to such people as James Madi- son and his party. Let it further be borne in mind, that soon af- ter the deposing of Napoleon, there having been a debate in the house of commons relative to the reduction of the navy, there was published in the newspapers of the next day, a paragraph, pur- porting to be the report of a speech of Sir Joseph Yorke, one of the lords of the admiralty, in which paragraph it was stated, that though Napoleon was deposed, we could not yet disarm to any great extent, seeing that there was Mr, Madison yet to dmose. The newspapers have ever since held the same language. They have, since the deposition of Napoleon, wholly left out of sight the original ground of the war. Nay, they pretend to have no ground at all; but insist that, as we now have the opportunity ; as we have a fleet afloat, and a disciplined army that we know not what to do with, we ought, while the occasion offers, to re-conmter Ame* rica, or, at least, to despoil her in such a way that she snail never again be able to show her nose upon the sea. They have pub- lished a list of the American navy ; and have observed upon it, that if America be not now cut up ; if she be not now, while France, Spain, and Holland are unable to assist her ; if she be not now crippled past recovery ; if she be now suffered to have peace ; if, in short, »he be not now destroyed, it is fearful to think of the de- gree of naval power at which she may arrive in the course of ten or a dozen years of uninterrupted prosperity, having had a proof of what her seamen are capable of performing. That I have here not overcharged, not, in the smallest degree, mIsrepreBented the language of these prints, every reader will allow ; and, indeed, I must confess they spoke very nearly the language of the whole nation. How the people ot America, from whom nothing can be kept se- cret, have received this language, I know not ; but if I were to judge of their feelings by what I know to be their character, I should suppose that it must have filled them with indignation, if, iodeed, that feeling did not give way to that of contempt. They i ■y ■I r 174 Letters of William Cobhett, Esq. iKi y\ m must, however, have seen the abaohite necessitj of union and Of exertiotty unless they were disposed to become again dependent upon England ; unless, in short, they were disposed to become again royal provinces, governed by the sons of the rtc^ility of England. The time chosen by our prints for the making of thove undisguised declarations was very suspicious. It was the flfioment when France, Spain, and Holland, were put into a state which ren- dered it impossible for them to assist America. It was the mo- ment when we were freed from all enemies ; when all the maritiaae force of Europe was in our hands. It was, in short, the first seem* ingly fair opportunity for subjugating America that had been offer* ed us since the conclusion of the 4merican mar; and this oppor- tunity the language of these prints must have led the Americans to believe was about to be takun for the purpose of executing the projects In the year 1794, or 5, a Mr. Rutledge, who was a judge in South Carolina, made a speech, in which he besought his country to join itself with the republic of France in a mortal war against England. " She will," said he, " never forgive us for our success against her, and for our having established a free con- •tifution. Let us, therefore, :^ '11 l-r^i' ''I M i w i ^ t I t 41 ue Iref^crx of William CobbetU Esq, Ihey would all, or, at least the worst of them, come tvithout it* Not to have undertaken the war, or to put a stop to it now, would havf been, and would now be, to leave the Americans in posses- sion of the naval reputation they have acquired, in possession of all the means of augmenting their naval force, and, wliat is of still more consequence, in the enjoyment of real freedom, and of hap- piness unparalleled under a republican government, at once an ex- ample and an asylum to all the disloyal of every country in £urope. Leaving her thus, she must, in the present state of men's minds, prove the destruction of ail kingly government, and of every hierarchy in the world. Therefore, even failure in the war is no objection to persevering in it, seeing that the worst that can arise out of the war must arise out of suffering this republir to enjoy peace, especially with the reputation that she ha« ^ ed on thai element, the absolute dominion of which we ao long claimed. When there is at least a possibility of destroying this republic by war, and no possibility of avoiding destruction from her without war, reason says, go on with the war V* I know that there are many that argue thus, because I have heard them argue thus. And I must confess that, if I could bring myself to their feelings as to the consequences which they dread, I should be bound to say that their arguments were unanswerable. As the matter stands, I could, I think, give a satisfactory answer ; but as every one likes to have something left to be supplied by himself, I leave the reader to give to these arguments such an answer as, after some minutes of sober reflection, his mind may suggest. Before I conclude, however, I must repeat what I have before said, as to the dilemma in which we are placed. It is very certain that America, at peace, in the enjoyment of such perfect freedom, and such great superiority, under a republican government, the very head of which does not receive above five thousand pounds a year, and having no established church, and no use for the hang- man, it is certain that A lerica, presenting this picture to the world, might and would keep alive the spirit of jacobinism in Europe ; and that spirit might, in a few years, produce very se- rious consequences. But, on the other hand, to prevent her from presenting this dangerous picture to the world, we mfist keep up all our present taxes^ and, perhaps, continue to make loans. This is the dilemma — the grand dilemma, in which we are at pre- sent placed, and out of which, I must confess, I do not sc^ how we are to get, unless we were, as the Times supposes we shall, to finish this insolent republic in the space of *' a few months,^* ■'1^1/,' Lellers of William Cobhettf Esq* m AMERICAN WAR. _ The expedition against the city of Washington^ or, rather, the result of it, has produced, in this country, the effect which might naturally have been expected : " The Yankees are done for ! Their metropolis has been taken ! They ran away at the sight of our troops ! Mr. Madison and his government have decamped ! The states are left without rulers ! The ' ill-organized association/ says the Times newspaper, ' is on l^e eve of dissolution ;* and the world is speedily to be delivered of the inischievous example of the existence of a government founded on democratic rebellion^* Thus says the Times, and thus says a vast majority of this taxeid nation. This was to be expected. The name o/mcfropo/is was enough. The people here were sure to look upon it as the London of America ; and, of course, to conclude that America was sub" dued, or very nearly subdued. This is, too, the notion held forth by the newspapers ; and, in fact, it universally prevails. Now, the truth is, that the city of Washington is no city at all, except in name. I' was begun to be built only about sixteen years ago. The congress has not jiet at it above ten or twelve years. It was built by a sort of lotte^ /, the shares of which fell, at one time, to less than 10 per cent, of their cost. The lottery was drawn ; the priises were not paid. I do not, indeed, know what may have been done since I left the country ; but at that time it was the general opinion that it never would be a place of any consideration, though the law compelled the congress to meet there. " Wherever the king is there is the court ;'* but the republican government of America, though they may have had the puerile pride of erecting a capilol and a firesident*s palace, could not make a city, which implies a numerous population, and great wealth. *» But our officers, naval as well as military, appear to have per- ceived what would hit the taste of war-loving Johnny Bull. John- ny, who has no doubt of his having conquered France, would, of course, be delighted at the prospect of conquering America, to- wards which he would necessarily look on the rapture of Wash- ington as an almost last step ; and, indeed, I heard soihe people, usually very sensible, say, upon the receipt of the news, " Thunfc God, we shall now have peace, and have the income tax taken off" What, in the eye of common sense, is the event of which we have made such a boasting ? We have, with an enormously superior naval force, ascended a very cap'acious bay in America, to the distanceof about sixty miles. We h;ive landed an army ; we have repulsed the militia of superior numbers ; (as we say ;) we have en- tered a straggling town of wooden buildings, which our own news- papers had told us the Americans themselves had acknowledged ;■ I 1 w> tMters t^WiltiamVomdt, Esq. to be defencelesH ; we have set fire to several buildings and soniie ships ; we have, thank God, burnt the president's palace, and a building on a ridiculously grand scale, called the capitol, where the legislature of the union held its sittings ; we have then retreat- ed, and regained our ships with such haste, that wi^ hav« been compelled to leave our dead, and many of our wounded officers, as well as men.io the mercy of an enemy, whom our newspapers call unprincipled, cowardly, and cruel. This is what the Morning Chronicle calls one of the most *^ gallant dashes'* of the war. This IS styled success. Tins is a victory to boast of. This is to induce the Americans to go down upon their knees, and solicit peace on any terms ! Why did our army not remain at Wash- ington ? When the French got to Berlin, Vienna, Naples, Hano- ver, Madrid, Amsterdam, they remained in them as long as they pleased. When they got to Moscow even, they remained for some weeks. But we— -we capture the metropolis of America, and we flecamp instantly. We set off in such haste, that we leave be- hind us many of those who have been wounded in the enterprise. Oh, reader ! how has Napoleon been abused for leaving behind him his sick and wounded, when he retreated from Russia ! and yet we can extot the bravery and wisdom of those who, in our own service, do the same thing ! Far am I, however, from blam- ing Mr. Ross for leaving his wounded behind him; for, in the first place, he was sure that be left them in the hands of a very humane people ; and, in the next place, by delaying his departure, he might have added a very long list to his killed and wounded. But it is impossible to find out any apology for Mr. Ross, upon this occasion, without furnishmg an apology for the so-much-repro- bated conduct of Nnpoleon. Mr. Ross assigns the best possible /eaaon for his wonderful expeditious retreat to (he ships; namely, he was afraid that if he delayed this movement, the militia might collect in stich numbers as to intercept him. The militia. What, that same sort of troops whom he had just overthrown, as it were, by merely showing his red coats ? How were they to collect in such haste ? Whence were they so speedily to cone ? Thank you, Mr. Ross, for this acknowledgment, though, perhaps, made involuntarily; because it proves clearly that you were fully con- vinced that you were not among a people on whose cowardice and whose want of patriotism you could place a moment's reliance ; because it clearly proves, in short, that if we succeed in this war, jFe have a people, an armed people, to subdue. There is one fact stated in the report of the enterprise, to which our news writers pay no attention ; but which is of very great importance. After the American troops had gone ofT, and left ours to enter the city, General Ross, our commander, had his horse shot under him, as he was going along at the head of his men, by a gun fired from the window of a private house. There Letters qf WiUium Cobhdt, Esq, m can be no doubt that the ball was intended for the rider. This might have given him, and, I dare say, did give him, a tolerable lively idea of what sort of people he was got amongst ; and it ought o convince wise Johnny Bull, that to follow the advice of rt, it was a body of the people, volontarily assembled, and acknowledging no stiperior not of their own electing: this was the sort of force against whom Sir Peter Parker marched. They were, as usualy greatly superior in num- hers ; and, as usual, they were defeated, and ran away. But, in the end. Sir Peter lost his life, and his second in command suc- ceeded mwlial^ Why, in bringing off to the ship almost all our wounded ! As to the destruction of the public buildings at the city of Washing- ton, it will give great pleasure to all those who really love republican governments. There are /?a/aces enough elsewhere. America wants none ; and it will, 1 dare say, bo very long before she will see an- other. There are very good buildings in Baltimore, Philadelphia, and many other elegant and populous cities. There wants no ^^randeur *, there wants no capitol, no palace, no metropolis, no (ourt. All these bring taxes and standing armies; and the Ame- ricans want neither. There was, the other day, an article in the Times newspaper which struck me as a remarkable instance of the force of aabit, and as a clear proof that a man may accustom him- self to slavish ideas, till be, in good earnest, regards as a reproach every matv of freedom. The article to which I allude, was a commentary on a paper published by a person to whom the de- fence of Nfw- York was coiiimitled, and who, in a very pressing manner, invites, exhorts, requests, and besecclics persons capable of bearing arms, to come forth and augment his force, &c. &6. Upon this, the editor of the Times observ es, that this officer cuts I !■ y-. ')i\\ 180 Litters of William Cohhettt Esq. i:; a moat sorry and lamentable figure; and he jests most merrity upon the tone of the poor gentleman, " who," says he, " invites^ exhorts, requests, beseeches : anything but commands." . Well! and what of that ? Are the people less happy because no one as- sumes a commanding tone towards tliem? Is their situation less enviable for that ? Is their character less dignified because they will nut suffer themselves to be commanded in any way whatever ? They do not like to be commanded by any body | and why should we quarrel with them on that account? This editor, and many others, seem astonished that Mr. Madi- son should have been two years at war without being prfinarfid for defence. But what do they mean by defence ? Three hun- * (dred — nay, twenty hundred thousand men, would not be suflScient to guard every point, where a few men can be landed for a few hours, on a coast (including bays and mouths of rivers) of three or four thousand miles in extent. Such adventures as admiral Coch- ^ rane gives an account of, might, with such a navy as ours, be per- formed on such an extent of coast in spite of two or three millions ^ of regular soldiers. The defence of America, and, indeed, of any country, does not mean the preventing of the bombardment of a village, or the burning of a city, or the carrying off" of " stock»" It means the preventing of that country from being subdued, or, so much crippled as to make a disgraceful peace. And this de- fence, in America, must be l^ to the peoj^le themselves. Mr. ^Madison could raise no regular armies. The people do not give him the means to do it. They know very well that, for want of a regular army, they are liable to have some towns knocked down, or sacked ; but they prefer this to the putting of a standing army in the hands of any man in their country. We, indeed, are of a taste widely different. We have field marshals, hundreds of ge- nerals, and colonels, and majors, and captains, and barrack-masters, and commissaries, and cadets, and soon. We have military de- pots, academies, colleges, and so on, to a long list. We have, be- dsides, great numbers of foreign officers, some of whom have had commAinds in England itself, and of counties of England. We have also great numbers of foreign soldiers in our pay. This is our taste. We like to have these people. But, then, we very cheerfully pay for all these fine things. We ar* willing to pur- Jchase our safety in this way. Now, as I never heard that the Ame- ^ricans have quarrelled with us on this account, why should we quar- rel with them for their taste ? They prefer a few towns sacked or beaten down now and then, to the paying for a standing army, for bar- racks, depots, military colleges. Their taste may be bad. They ; may prove themselves very stupid in not liking to see their streets crowded with beautiful, tall, straight gentlemen, with pretty hats and caps, with furs, and whiskers, with cloaks, and glittering ' swords, and boots, that shine Kke japan mugs. But sivepidily is no Latm of William CohbetU Esq. 181 crime ; and if they do not like these things, we, who ha?e so much more refinement amongst us, and so much more elevation of mind, should view them with pity rather than with scorn ; should f. speak of them with compassion, rather than with reproach. We might as reasonably reproach them (and the French too, by the by) for not having a taste for tythea. We like these too. Mr. Burke said so many years ago. We like to give our clergy a tenth part of our crops. But, then, have we not our churches and cathedrals, our prayers and sermons, our bells and our singing, our Lord's supper, our baptism, confirmation, churching of women, absolution of the sick, and burial of the dead. We have all these things, and a great many more, in return for the tenth of our t^rops ; and the Americans (poor fellows !) have none of them. Yet we ought not to reproach them on this account. It is, doubtless, bad taste in them ; but, as I said before, bad taste is not criminal. Another thing I wish to point out to the attention of the reader. He frequently sees, in our newspapers, extracts from American papers, all tending to degrade the government and decry its mea- sures. Out of the three or four hundred newspapers, published in America, there arc, probably, ten or twelve who proceed in this tone. These are carefully sent hither by consuls, or other persons residing there. From these only, extracts are published here ; and, be it observed, that if we possessed the papers on the ^ other side of the question, we should be exposed to utler ruin if we were to publish such extracts from them as it would be neceS' sary to publish in order to give the public a fair view of the state of men's minds in America. But the hireling prints here do one thing for us : they, by their extracts, prove to us how great is freedom in America. The Times tells us, that one paper in America expresses its opinion that the president himself bad a narrow escape from Washington : and that another expresses its regret that he was not taken by tlie etiemy. Now, reader, ima* J gine, for a moment, the case of an enemy landed in England, and some writer expressing his regret that the said enemy had not captured the king ! You tremble for the unfortunate creature. I see you tremble. Your teeth chatter in your head; I hear them chatter : and well they may. How many loyal men do 1 hear exclaim : " Send the traitor to the gallows ! rip out his bowels and throw them in his face ! Cut off his head ! Quarter his vile carcass, and put the quarters at the king's disposal !" Yet we hear the American writers wishing that their chief magistrate had been taken by the enemy ; and we do not find that any thing is either said or done to them. Their publications are suffered to take their free course. If they be true, and speak sense and reason, they will gain adherents, as they ought. If false, or foolish, they will only gain the writers hatred or contempt, which, I dare say, has been the case in the instance before us. But, reader, let us I t ■ ' ! ■ |. Letters of miliam Cobbeltt Ear/* Jl:^ > 1 1 K i I- 1 ! out, with this fact full in our eyes, be induced to believe that the Americans have nothing to 6ght for ; or that anj man who loves freedom can wish to see a change in the government ; or* at least, ui the sort of government which exists in that country. As to IVJr. Madison, against whom our hired men rail so much, he cannot be much to lilame for any thing relating to the war. It was the congress ; the representatives of the people ; (he realt not the sham representatives of the people — who declared mar. In fact, it was the people themselves, who were resolved no longer to endure that which they had so long, and so loudly com- plained oC A war in America must be the people's war. The defence of the country must be left to the people. Not only as to the fighting, but as to the time, place, and every (hiur else be* longing to the war. The people know very well the extent qf their danger. They are well apprized of every thing. They were aware beforehand that what has taken place would take place; and though many individuals must and will sutTer, that will excite no general ijliscontent against the government. Of one thing I am very certain ; and that is, that we are carrying on pre< cisely that sort of warfare which all the real friends of republican government would wish to see us carry on. It is a sort of war- fare (especially when the ground of the war is considered) which cannot fail to unite the parties, into which the people have been divided ; nor do I think it at ail improb; ble, that we may cause Mr. Madison to be president four years lor^erthan he would have been without our war against his country, and our threat to depose him. For many men will naturally say that, though they would have liked to see him, following the example of Washington and Jefferson, decline a third term as president ; yet, seeing that his so doing might be interpreted as a mark of submission to us, he ought again to be elected. -y^ The favourite idea in England appears to be, that we ought to send out a great ovemhelming force, get possession of some place in the heart of the country, and there compel the government to surrender up the republic on our own terms. I suppose that our commanders knew better than to attempt any thing of the kind. I suppose that our government knew better than to order them, or to authorize them to make any such attempt. And yet, what are we to do by such a mode of warfare as we are now car.rying on T Suppose we were to get possession of New-York, and some other maritime towns, what should we gain but an enormous expense to keep those places ? Cooped up in them, how ridiculous should we look ! No : we shall never beat that people, unless the people themselves join tis ; and as this has not been the case yet in any one instance, what reason have we to expect but that it never will be the cage, in spite of all the allurementa held out to that people in the prospect of participating in (be support of ihe army, the Letters of H^iUiam Cohhett, Esq. 183 navy, the church, the law, the nobility, and the Ananctal Byitem of the former *' molher country ?" But we must not, in this larger view of the American war, overlook particular events, and espe^ cially that just announced to us from Fort Erie. In my last I noticed the bloody battle of Chippewa. After that ' battle, it appears that the cohteat was renewed (oitr army having been reinforced) in the front of Fort Erie, into which the Yankem had retired, and where our gallant countrymen and their aasociatet seemed to have been resolutely bent to fulfil our wishes, atid to give them " a drubbing." Alas ! the *' drubbing*' fell upon oar own gallant army, who amounted to only about two thousand nen, and who r.'ere compelled to retreat with ail possible speed, leavnig 905 either dead, wounded, or prisoners ! The American general, Gaines, says, that he destroyed our people at the point of the bayonet. Our general says that the angle of a bastion was blown up with two hundred of our men on it. This last might be, and yet the case would not be much altered in our favour. Such a conflict as this I never before read of. It surpasses that of Chip- pewa ; and that surpassed, in point of proportionate destraction, any thing in modern warfare. And it ought to be observed, that a ^reat part of this army of Yankees were militia ; some of them volunteers ; and not a man of them who would suffer any one to say that he had him under bis comimmd ! It is, then, a fact be- yond all dispute, that the Yankees will sometimes Gght ; and as there is no such thing as ascertaining beforehand the precise time when the fighting fit will come on them, they beii^ such an irre- gular sort of people, and subject to no kind of discipline, I think it is the height of prudence in our commanders on the Atlantic coast not to venture too far at a time from our ships. Upon hearing of the battle of Erie, (for it cost as many men all several of the battles of Wellington,) I was, I must confess, eager to hear what the Times writer would be able to say upon the sub- ject. I had half a mind to hope that he would begin to repent of the part he had acted in the stirring up of this war; but on reflec- tion, I concluded that, like the reprobates mentioned in the good book, repentance iv s not in bis power. This conclusion Was right, as the reader will now see. " The unfortunate event which cast a partial shade over the successes of our Canadian army, is at length communicated to m in an authentic shape. We extract from the papers received yesterday from that part of the world, a copy of Sir George Pre- vost's general order, dated Montreal, 25th of August, which states the loss sustained at the attack on Fort Erie, on the 1 3th pre- ceding, at 802 killed, wounded, and missing. Compared with the whole number of General Drummond's force, this loss is no doubt very considerable ; but we are glad to see no hint given that the event is likely to occasion our troops to fall back. The misad- 4\ r i'^ ; ' t ■ ■ St! M I K m 184 11 i A LetUra of IViUiam Cobbettt Esq. venture must, no doubt, be ranked amongst those chances of war to which the bravest armiest and best-laid planSf are subject. It was preceded by a brilliant achievement, executed four daya before by captain Dobbs, of the royal navy, who, with a party of seamen and marines, most gallantly boarded and took two armed schooners, anchored close to Fort Erie. The consequence of thia capture being to deprive the enemy's position of a great part o£ its defence, Gen. Drummond resolved to follow it up by a general attack on Fort Erie and the American entrenchments. In thia daring attempt he had nearly attained complete success. The spirit of our brave soldiers surmounted every obstacle. They had ac- tually entered the fort, and had already turned part of its guns against the enemy's last point of refuge, when suddenly a tremen- dous explosion took place, which not only destroyed many valuable lives, but necessarily involved all our operations in confusion, and left no alternative but a precipitate retreat to our first approaches. It is evidentf therefore, that General Gaines's boast of having re- pulsed our men at the point of the bayonet is idle gasconades The lamentable result was, in all probability, occasioned by acci' dent ; but if the American general had any share in it, it was one which reflected more credit on hii policy than on his bravery. To spring a mine on an assailing enemy may be, in such circumstances, an allowable mode of destruction ; but whilst humanity is pained by contemplating such an event, there is no counter feeling of admiration for the heroism of those by whom the dreadful deed was executed !" Oh ! you vile hypocrite ! ** humanity^* on your lips ! on those same lips from which have proceeded so many urgent exhortations to exterminate the Americans ; and who, in this very same num- ber of your sanguinary paper, commend Sir Thomas Hardy for having bombarded, and, as you then thought, burnt to ashes the dwellings of the people of the village of Stonington ! Humani- ty ! This cant may do in a country where cant is so much iu vogue ; but be you assured that it will only excite contempt io the breast of the enemy. You can discover " no heroism,' can you, in the defenders of Fort Erie, who had lost their water-side defence before the battle began ? The three officers of colonel Scott's regiment, who came out of the battle alive and not wound- ed, would, like Job's servants, tell you a different story ; unless, indeed, like Bobadil, they were (which I am sure tney would not do) to attribute their beating to the planets^ instead of the American bayonets. For my part, 1 believe General Gaines's in preference to General Drummond's report. Not because I ques- tion the veracity of the latter, but because I know that he might be misinformed, and that General Gaines could not be misinfunued, as to the fact. But, a-d I said before, this fact oi the blowing up of the angle of a bastion does not materially affect the merits of Iquea- inight kued, k up lita ol Ldlera of Willidm Cohhett, Esq, m (he cue ; and, unless the American people be very difiereut in their natures from all other people, the event mu«t have created a wonderful sensation in the country ; and 1 am sure, that, in the eyes of any man in England whose reason is not totally deadened by prejudice, it must have excited a dread that, if we pursue that project of subjugation so strongly recommended by the writers here, we are now embarked in a war of extraordinary bloodshed, of no ordinary duration, and of an expense that will keep on all our present taxes, and occasion constant, annual loans. Sir, to THE PRINCE REGENt. DuRiifO the years 1811 and 1812, while I was imprisoned in a felon^s jail, for having written and caused to be printed and f>ubli8hed, an article on the subject of flogging of English local mi- itiamen, at the town of Ely, in England, and about the attendance of German troops at the ceremony ; whije 1 was expiating thia offence by two years imprisonment in a felon's jail, and by paying, at the close of the period, a thomand pounds jine to you, acting in the name and behalf of your Father, who, during my imprisonment, became afflicted with his present malady ; during this long period of seclusion from my home and from the wholesome air, I addressed to you several Ultera on \he dispute rvilh America ; in which let* tera I endeavoured to convince you that the dispute, if it tarmina^ ted in war, might lead to very fatal consequences to thia country. I, in these letters, stated clearly the grounds of the dispute ; I traced the causes of our ill blood with America to their origin ; I Sointed out how the dispute might be put an end to without a war ; endeavoured to show you the probable fatal consequences of a war with that nation of freemen, taking up arms voluntarily^ and upon conviction of the goodness of their cause. I spent whole days and nights in endeavours to warn you against believing (he reports of the venal wretches who were labouring to persuade this nation that we had only to go to war with Mr. Madison in order to effei t a breaking up of the American union ; and I was the more anxious on this point, as it was the general opinion, that, un- less the states could be induced to divide, we never should long be able to cope with them in a war within their territory. As the vanity naturally belonging to an author makes me con- elude that you read these letters with great attention, I will not here go into any detail on their contents. But if we now look at the state of the war in the gross, without any particular feature being taken into view, does it not appear that we should have been fortunate if my advice had been followed? We should never tlipn 24 "I !1 1 ii ■,1: :i^:i m J 'r .1 :'i: S4-. v|}. I C r. vf .r 1 B^ n Bi ;i HI ■ ■ ^*i'i] t> # is% 'V* ^. ^ w IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 7 A €<. iLs. V Ck'x A y. 1.0 i^ !■■ 2.2 ? '- ||M mil 1.8 I.I 1.25 1.4 1.6 = — ^ ^ fc" ■ ► V] c^: <^i A vj ^># ^ ^. 7 >^ Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 %2p i/.A m Letters of William Cobbett, Esif. S I ^1 ft have heard of . For the present I will confine myself to the last-mentioned bat* tie, which has excited great attention' all over Europe, and ha» called forth, on the victors, the most unqualified expressions of praise and adtnirafion fronfi our neighbours, the French, where^ b« it observed, nothing is published but with the consent of the govenn ment. *' This is a natal affair ; an affair ptirett/ naval. There appears to have been no accidental circumstance to affect it. The force on each side was as nearly equal as need be, in «rder to come at fi^ proof of ihe relative menUs of the two fleets. The battle, there- fore, will be considered of ten thousand times more importance in this light than in the light of its effects upon the campaign in Ca- nada. " But, before I proceed to the eonsequmtes of this battle, I think it best to say a word or two upon the subject of the place where the battle was foiight. Lake Champlain is partly in your father's provinces of Canada, and partly in thu territory of the re- public of America. It is, perhaps, t50 miles long, and from half a mile to 10 or 15 miles wide. 1 do not know that I can mufch better describe it than by comparing it to the SERPENTINE: BIVER in Hyde Park, which is fed out of the lakes in Ken- sington gardens. The boundary line across Lake Champlain f» very neatly and aptly represented by the embankment and bridge which separate the upper from the lower part of the Serpentine Jftiver ; and the ponds and ditches leading from that separation cown through Chelsea to the Thames, very luckily coijae to re- present the British part of Lake Champlain, which empties its overflowings into the St. Lawrence between Montreal and Quebec, and which is the only highway from the republican territory ta those two chief seats p£ the power of the house of Brunswick in that country. Whether it was this strong resemblance in the shape of Lake Champlain and that of th6 Serpentine River which led, seme few months ago, to the ingenious device of exhibiting hostile fleets in miniature on the latter, I have not been informed ; bi>^ there are few persons in this country, I believe, who do not sorely grieve to think, that in the battles upon these two waters the representation should have differed so widely from that of reality, the accounts of which have recently come to band. The battle on the Serpen* tine River, though contested for some tfme pretty stoutly by the Yankees, was at liast decided in our favour. Bt-itannia, 1 am told* (for I saw it not,) with the trident of Neptune in her Band, was teen crowning her sons with bay, while poor Tomathan, with his faok hair hanging over hjs drooping head, stood a captive under Letters of William CohheUt Esq, m liis ovn flag} which was hai^i:^ reverted under that of your royal house } thereby iodicatii^ not only a naval superiority over the Yankees, but anticipating that^ whenever they snould dare to meet us, they would be beaten and captured* There was not, I beKeve, an opportunity of exhibiting thui scene to the emperor of Hussia and Iciog of Prussia, who were thus deprived of a sight of those •igosof ecstatic delight which the people expressed, and of & hear* ittg of their heart-cbeering shouts, when they saw poor Jonathan haul down his colours, and when they heard the martial bands strike up '* Rule BrUanniaf Britannia rule the waves P* in the chorus of which they joined with their half a million of male and female voices, till the sound seemed to fill all the space between the earth and the sky. The foreign sovereigns were, for want of time, deprived of this sight. But in the harbour of Portsmouth, on the day of your arcival there in company with them, I myseU «aw, on board of some ships, the flag of poor Jonathan again re* versed, and banging under that of your Royal House. Alas, sir ! how different has been the realilif from the anticipa* ting representation ! upon Lake Champlain, that Serpentine River on a grand scale, how different has been the event from that of the representation, which drew forth the air-rending shouts of half a imliion of the people of this country! Aye, of half a million of a people, on whom it is no more than a just eulogium to say, that they are, in every respect, worthy of being the subjects of the king that reigns over them, and of the regent who acts in the name and behalf of that king ! There are some few exceptions, to be sure ; some few malecontents ; some few, whom neither king nor God can please. But, speaking of them in a mass, your facer's people are worthy of spch a sovereign, and such a sovereign is worthy of such a people. To return to the battle of Lake Champlain, I have deeply to lament that WE HAVE NOT HAD ANY OFFICIAL AC- COUNTS PUBLISHED RESPECTING IT, and yei it is now the Tth of November. It is not for me to presume to know, or even to guess, why no such account has yet been published. So far am I from attempting to Jind fault upon this occasion with men iii power, that I am not even disposied to inquire into their motives for not publish g the account in question. I am quite wiUing to allow, that they are the best possible judges of what they are about ; that they know best when to publish and when to b^ silent. But I may, and I must, lament their not publishing, because, in the meanwhile, the republican account is gone forth to the world, and which account is calculated to make a most injurious hnpres* sion upon the world, particularly with regard to the relative value of the naval characters of the repnblic of America, and of the uni* led kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. If the republican H- ■M -m ■. til ■•■ ■ 'I -^■5 188 LdUrs. of WUlumCobbettt Esq. count be true, the event was, in tb is vievr of it, the most fatal that can be imagined ; for not only were your royal father's ships aupe- rior in both mm andgtins ; not only was his majesty's fleet beaten by the republicans under such circumstances, but it ifaftiaifren, all taken, ana that, too, mUhoitt any lery great ahmg^tvi This, re- publican account is as follows; and, as you will peueive,> it is published from that very city of Washington, the public edifices of which your royal father's fleet and army so recently burnt to the ground. Washinotun, September t9. Cipn of a letter fnm Commodore Macdonough to the Secretorjf o/'the' JVa/ty, dated U, S. »hip Saratoga, off Plattsburg, Sept. \X, < ,, y .. " Sir— The Almighty has been pleased to grant ua a signal victory on Lake Champ' lain, in the cnpture of one frigate, one brig, and tivo sloops of war of the enemy. 1 have the houour to be, very respectfully, Ac. your obedient servant v-< ^<'' fSigned) T. MACDONQUOH, CoiS. #911. W. Jvnetp Secretary -^fthe JW^y. SKITISH. Gum. Men. KiUed. Wounded, <( liarge ship. 39 SIM SO 60 (t Brig, 16 IK) S!0 SO Growler, 11 40 6 10 Kagle, 13 Gun-boats, 11 40 8 10 18 S50 two probably sunk. Total, 95 1050 84 110 SeTeralof the gun-boats straok; but thesinking state of the large vessels requif* ed the assistance of the men in bur gallies, so that not being able U> take possessipQ of thent ; the^ were able to save thenuelvet byJUfht. AMBSICAV. Saratoga, ship, Eagle, brig. Ticonderoga, sohr. Prehle, sloop, 10 Gun-boats, Gnna. 86 SO 17 7 16 Total, 86 Men, 210 120 no SO S50 Killed 88 IS 6 9 S Woundid. S9 29 6 3 58 y^.^i Thus, sirt if this account be true, (for I do only spoak hypon thetically,) the royal fleet had more gum and more men than the republican fleet, and yet the royal fleet was not only beaten, but all CAPTURED! This American commodore is very laconic. He does not seem to regard such an event as worthy of any very particular detail. He does not seem to have observed any par* ticular instance of courage or skill in his officers and men. In »hort, he seems to have thought, that what had happened was no LetUriqf Williitd (Mhettj Esq. 18d po- the but lie. ivy Dar* In no more than what his country would expect, notwithstanding all that tin people of England had seen OH the Serpentine River. He tttlks of no diflSculties ; no dangers ; no resistance ; and, i^the ac- count be true, he took the whole fleet before he had killed and wounded affth part of its men, and before he had lost in killed and wounded only about an eightk part of his own mm. Mr. Ma- dison, in his account of the battle, if it may be so called, is still morepro^okingly laconic and reserved. He says, " The British squadron lately came into action with the American on Lake Champlain ; it issued in the capture of the whole of the enemy*8 ships. The best praise of Captain Macdonough and his intrepjid comrades, is the likeness of his triumph to the illustrious victory which immortalized another officer on anothr lake" Thus hint- ing to the world that such events as this are nothing new. Mr. Madreon, it was anticipated by the sages who write in the Times newsj^aper, would talk very big about this victory, and thereby blind the people with regard to their dangers. He seems to have been determined to make them false prophets. He does but just notice this victory in a transient sort of way, and dwells with great force, and with studious care, on the dangers which the people of the republic have to meet. Now, sir, this republican account is either trrte or false. I do not pretend to say that it is true, though it has not been- officially contradicted in any one particular, and though my brother jour' nalists seem, by implic.:;tion at least, to admit the truth of it, [ have not, I do not, and I will not, say that it is true, even should every other man in the kingdom s&y it. But I humbly presume that I may venture to assert that it is either true or false. If looked on AS true, it certainly must produce, and must already have produced, ft very great effect on the minds of thinking men in all those [.arts of the world to which a knowledge of it has extended. It will produce this effect : it will cause it to be believed, that a ship of the royal'navy of Great Britain is not equal to the task of com- bating a ship of equal force belonging to the republic of America, commanded by officers, and manned by men, of that republic. It ii impossible for any man, not a fool, or not blinded by some sort of passion, to be ignorant that such must be the effect of this bat- tle, if the republican account of it pass for tme* It is equally im- possible for any man to hope that it will not pass for true, until it be explicitly and officially stated to he false, and until it be proved also to be false. The world will naturally ask how it has hap- pened that the British government, who are so exact in publishing every account of our naval operations; who do not omit the cap- ture of a merchant-ship, whereof a history is sent to John Wilson Croker, Esq. ; should have been so backward upon this particular occasion ; that the people who witnessed the anticipating repre- "•..Str-V| ■:-:| ■ i / H E^ '' B ^1' l^m ',m 1 i^M i\ U \ I 1 "i j! , 1 t 1 1 1 1 i i 1 I 1 !■ : V t ^cB i 190 Letkra of mitiam Cobheltj Es^, m lentations on tho Serpentine River, and who are so eager for news from America, soouid not yet have been officially inform* ed of the battle of Lake Gfaamplain, though a mention of it has reached Europe, and even England, in the presidenl'e i^peech. The world will naturally ask horn this has happeiH «d. Tho world, sir, looks very anxiously towards the republic^ They ^ee in her a pover rising fast to a rivalship with us. They look towards her with rather more than the eyes of impartiality^ Our navy has excited great jealousy and envy in the world. That navy the world wishes to see matched, or, at least, held in checks This is not at all wonderful; but, for my part, 1 shall not state what I look upon as the true causes of it. As a proof of the sentiments prevalent upon this subject in France, I here ^uote an article from a French paper of the 39th of September : '* On ikt situtUion of the United Stales. — The capture of Washington has made a great deal of noise in Europe. It was generally believed, on the credit of the London newspapers, thaH that event would have a decisive influence on the war which rages between Great Britain and the United States. Already peo|rie were expecting to see the American government humbly soiicitinig peace, and submitting to all the conditions which it might pleast the cabinet of St. Jamea to impose upon it. Some persons, who judge of the United States from the old nations of Europe, confr- dently announce the dissolution of the American republic, and did not conceive what could exist after the every way reprehensible destruction of the capitol and other buildings of Washington. It seemed to them that that rising city was the palladium of America, and that its fall must draw along with it that of ail the states which compose this great and tine confederation. Profound alarm, it was said, had seized all the inhabitants of the United States ; every province was hastening to deprecate British vengeance, by de- taching itself from the federal union ; Boston, Philadelphia, Baiti- more, New- York, Charleston, Savannah, were on the point of open* hig their gates to the conqueror, and re-entering the colonial sys- tem of England. The better informed, however, were far from participating in this opinion. They knew that the great majority of the Americans were attached to their government, and would deem no eSbtt too painful to support their independence. There is much talk of the parties which exist in the United States ; bnt these parties are not factious : they never fail to unite when the country is in danger. In America, as in England, men dispute about the acquisition of power; but their patriotism is never shaken. Their very discussions nourish public spirit, and elevate national pride and the sacred love of liberty above every other sentiment. The strength of the United States is not in the mari* time towns ; it lies in that numerous population who cultivate the jLe/{er« of William Cobbelt, E^q, m ground, and seek subsistence in the naidst of forests. These hardy cultivators, these indefatigable hunters, form excellent troops, easily disciplined, and who brave every fatigue and danger. They are the sons of men who triumphed at Saratoga and Bunker's Hill. The recollection of these exploits still animates their courage. This inheritance of glory is a national property which they will transmit entire to their descendants* These hunters, known by the name of riflemen, are formidable enemies. They use muskets of a particular kind, and at the distance of two hundred paces they seldom miss their aim. In the war of independence they did a gceat deal of mischief to the English armies, and deprived them •f a prodigious number of, officers. It appears certain, that the expedition of the Chesapeake, under admiral Cochrane, had for its object to force the American government to recal the troops which menaced the frontiers of Upper and Lower C anada. This diver- sion would have been advantageous to the English ; but it did not succeed. While the efforts of the British army expired before BaUitnore, iheAmericans were destroying '^ht English Jieet on Lake Champlain, and beating the army qf CanadOt which retired with considerable loss in men and stores. On this occasion we have heard mention, for the first time, of those famous militia of the state of Veimont, who so gloriously distinguished themselves in the last war, under the name of Green Mountain Boys. They have lost neither theur courage nor their renown. The defeat of the English on Lake Champlain exposes the frontiers of Lower Canada. If from Plattsburgh the Americans proceeded to St. John's, a little town badly fortified at the head of the lake, they can arrive in two marches on the banks of the river St. Lawrence, opposite Montreal., and make themselves masters of the beautiful plun of Chambli, the most abundant of all Canada in pasturage and grain. It is not on the coasts that the fate of the war will be decided, but in the interior of the country, and on the banks of Lake Champlain and Ontario. The English are good soldiers ; they possess both honour and courage -y but the war they have undertaken against the United States does not depend either on a maritime expedition, or on a battle guned. Obliged to fight at a great distance from their country, they repair wiith difficulty their losses, either in men or ammunition, whilst the A.mericans easily recruit themselves. The expenfies of England are enormous, as we may judge from the pice of a single piece of cannon transported to Lake Ontario. It is estimated to have cost a thousand guineas. The British minis- try thought, no doubt, that in taking the advantage of their maiitime superiority, to insult the shores of the United States, and to menace the commercial towns with complete destruction, they would have produced in that country a powerful opposition^ which would com- l\ ,/ m ■; ',' fil ''I '' ill If if,*' " "W JTP * I ft! i\' -1<: ft, 188 JbeUers of miliam Cohbeti, Esq, ■■| I i I>9l the American government to sue for peace. 1 hia expectation, must be disappoioted ; it shows bow little America is known in Europe. The actual government does not want the support of what is called the commercial interest ; it derives all its force from the frank and generous adhesiob of the farmers, who are^tbe most enlightened men in the United States, and the most attached to their country. Besides, the burning of Washington, instead of abating their courage, has only tended to irritate them against an enemy who tramples on the principles adopted by civilized nations^ Mr. Madison, who enjoys the highest honour that can be desired— ~ that of presiding over the destiny of a free people ; Mr. Madison, I say, displays a noble character. All Americans rally at his voice ; and resolutions, full of energy and patriotism, have already) been adopted in the greater part of the towns which are most ex- posed to bombardment and to Congreve*8 rockets. The war haft become national ; and the Americans, who have fought courage^ ously, will henceforth fight with fury. It id not very difficult to foresee the issue of this sanguinary contest, too long maintained for the honour of humanity. After wasting herself in vain efibrtc^ England mill be forced to grant peace on conditions advantt^^- ous to the United StateSf and ought to think herself too happy in ? reserving her empire over Nova-Scotia and the two Canadas* expect that these reflections, intended to enlighten the numeroua readers of the Journal de Paris, upon a war more important than is generally supposed, will excite the indignation of the EnglisI^^ journalists. Those gentlemen attribute to themselves the exclusive privilege of reasoning upon events, and they are indiscreet enough to consider the Americans as rebels ; but this consideration will never prevent me from speaking the truth, and making known freely an opinion which I believe to be just. Nobody esteems the English nation more than I do ; but I confess I should be much vexed if she obtauied decisive advantages over the United States. She needs neither an increase of influence nor an eccession of territory. . Her interest imperiously commands her to respect the rights and independence of other people, and no longer to weary fortune." This, sir, is the language of the French ; these are their sen^ timents upon this war against the American republic. She has a i friend in every people in Europe, the people of this country ex- cepted. The world wishes success to the American republic, because the world envies England her power. The result of the battle of Lake Champlain has, perhaps, caused more real rejoicing than ever was caused by any battle in Europe during the last twenty years. In your speec/i of the 8th instant, an account of which I have now before me, the newspapers report jsu to have said, that " notwithstandiDg the reverse which APPEARS to have OC- . Utters <^f Williem CohbeU, E»q. tm CUARED on Lake Ghamplain, you entertain the most eonfideni expeclalions, an well from the amount as from the deicription tff force now serving in Canada, thftt the tiscendmcy of hi« mttjeilty'f arms throughout that part of North America will be effectualljr secured." From this it would seem that the " reverse'* on LiAcA Ohamplain ia not yet ascertainsd by your cabinet; t^>«t it ooly appears that there has been a " reverse.'* A reverse I bftve •!• ways understood to mean a check o/Ker a series of victoriei* Whether this be the character of the '* occurrence** in queationt I must leave for abler judges to deqide. Rut I am quite rejoiced to hear that you entertain such *^ confident expectations" of seeii^ i'ut '< ascendency" of his majesty^s arms "secured" In Canada; because I felt^ with many others^ some fear upon thii score, whan I found that an army of fourteen or fifteen thousand noeO) under tb«» commander in chief in person, had retreated in ha^te, ahd with great loss, from before a fortress containing five or six tbou- sand Americans. The republican commander asserts, that he captured a considerable part of our army, haying, by his militia and volunteerSf pursued it a considerable distance on its retreat Unless this account be false, there appears to me Still to be some little room for fear that the ascendency of his majesty's arms ill that quarter will not be maintained. You say, as the newspapers tell us, that you build your confident expectations on the amount as well as the description of the force noilr serving in Canada. But this force is exactly the same that appeared before the fort at Pittsburgh ; it is not changed since that time ; nor has there been any change in the force of the enemy. So that, to me, it does not, I miist confess, appear at all likely, that the prospect In Canada should brighten before another campaign has made some very material change in our favour. It is said that Sir George Prevost is recalled, if that could give us an advantage over the Yankees ; if that could defeat their triumphant fleets, the mea- sure would be of great value. The newspapers state that you spoke of " the brilliant and successful operations in the Chesapeake and at the City of Wash- ington.'* Having lately had the misfortune to see a couple of my barns oi) fire, I can the betteir conceive the brilliancy of the scene at Washington. But, sir, while this scene was exhibited there^ unfortunately^ the republicans were sallying from Fort Erie on the army of General Drumniond, and the fatal battle was preparing on Lake Champlain. What are the operations in the Chesapeake, when we look towards Canada ? If, indeed, we had been^able to REMAIN at Washington, the case would have been different. So far from that, our commander stated that he hastened away, leaving several of his wounded officers behind him, because be feared that the militia might collect, and cut off his retreat to the ships. Incursions like this are not much thought of in the worlds m H > \ -t i I ti ■ ' m A 'J u 1 ' k 25 ' lil at4 LHUra of WUliam Cobbett, tliq. Ml |.:^: ivhiiii men are tatkioK Of the probable temlt of watr. tt is true'^ that the character of our movementB in the Gheiapeake '* h&i produced on the miftda of the inhabitants a deep and snuible impression." But if I am to judge from the message of B|r. Ma- dison, that impression is one of the most reaolnte hostility towards England ; and from every thing that I hear from that country, I am convinced, that a disposition to yield to us, in any one point, was never so far from the breasts of the republicans as since our operations in the Chesapeake* However, we shall not now be manjf daya before we KNOW for a certainty what the American people My, and what they think, upon the subject of the war. For the congress will go into committees on the matters mentioned in the President's message. Those committees will make reports expressive of (heir opinions. Those reports will be discussed in the senate and house of representatives. When agreed to, they wiH be published. When published, they will express the senti- ments of the unbought, unsold representatives of a whole people, those representatives being chosen by the free voices of all the men in the country, who pay taxes to the amount of only a penny in a year. There can be no room for doubt in such a case. pear for tbe war nine hundred and ninety-nine out of 9ywy tbou^ aand. Tbe preii worked up the people to tbe war pitch, where it keeaa them. There are prevalent thete notion! : lit, That the republic joined Napoleon in tbe war against ua ) 2d, That we now an able to punieh iier for tbia ; Sd, That she went to war fbr the purpoae of robbing ua of maritime righia eaaential to our vary ejp* teteneei 4tb,ThM abe may now, nowtnom be crippled forover ; 6tb, That -we ought, at leaat, to continue tbe war until we have eff^acedi by vieforiea over the republican ahipa, the recollection of the ai^ iaJra of the Java, tbe Querriere, the Macedonian, the Avon, and of thoae on the lakes. The events in the Chesapeake^ and the de- acripUoo of them, have caused the nation to look upon tbe repub- licana as cowards. - This is very inconsistent with the L^.'are-men^' tioned notion ; but it prevails. So that here are all sorts bf ingre< dients necessary to make a war popular, and pc^Ular it is beyond every thing tbat ever was popular. It is quite useless for any one' to attempt to remove any of these notions, which have taken fast hold, and which it will require some years of war to shake. Jona- thant therefore, has no ground for reliance on any opposition ilk this country. The opposition in parliament will only be as to the tnode of proaecuting the war. If they censure, the burden of their censure will be, not against tbe mar, but against those who have not done enough against tbe enemy. The war, therefore, has popalarity to recommend it. This I allow, and, in so dohig, I have the mortification to confess, that all my labours against the war have [woved wholly useless. Still I think myself bound to endeavour, as occasion may offer, to give my reasons against its further continMance. I was happy to aee, in the newspaper report of your speech, thclt you bav^ " a sincere desire to brmg this war to a conclusion on just and honourable terms ;" and aa Mr. Madison expresses the same desire, let me hope that th? conclusion of the war may soon take place, without waiting till more sea battles have effaced the recollection of those which have already taken place. But, sir, what a pity it is that the war did not end with the war in Europe. What a pity it is that Mr. Madison has to complain of delays gn our part to give effect to our own proposition fo\r a direct negotia- ItHeri of WUHam OohheU, Etq, 1«7 (uw, afkr we htd rtfined the oflbr of the mediation of our omn ally, the emperor of Ruuia I A4id whet a pity it ii, that the Ame- rican people have, in our public printi, teen so much Wnm of their chiet magistrate, and ao many threats to reconqtwr their country! Since writing the above, the dfbattB on your speech have reach* ed me. With the exception of Mr. Wbltbread, and 8lr Gilbert Heathcote, all agreed that America was the aggressor in the war, and, as was anticipated, the only ftult imputed to the ministers wfts, that they had been remiss in their measures against her ; though, on the other hand, it is reported of one member who moved (he address, that be said, that ** our mtccessss against her had beeh UNVARIBD.*' The first lord of the admiralty stated, that he had not received the official account of the aflfair of Lake Champi* lah), which, besides, appeared flrom the language of the two houses to be considered as but a trifling sort of a thing, unworthy of any very particular notice. The speech of Mr. Whitbread was long, and, therefore, cannot be inserted here ; but that of Sir Gilbert Heatbcote shall have a place in this letter ; and, as you Cannot suspect him of any disloyal motive, 1 hope yon will give his words a patient attention. ** Sir GiLBBRT Hbathcotb rose and observed, that H would have been moet satisfactory to have heard from ministers that the negotiations at Ghent were going on favourably. That he could not approve of that part of the address which promised farther Support in the American war, inasmuch as the cause of the dUpule had cesued since ths g&neral pacificalian on the contin^t. When we* withdrew our Orders in Council, the Americans had rescinded their relative acts ; so that the right of searching American ships for British seamen alone remained as a subject of controversy. When peace was established throughout Europe, we could not think of exercising that right ; so that thil last point of contention fell to the ground naturally. The war must, therefore, be carried on for otMr reasons, for the sake of what might happen^ and not for my present grievance^ He thought the situation 5f the court- try did not warrant ministers in doing this. Were our finances 96 flourishing, the property tax a butthen so light and easy that it mattered not what might be the amount of the annual national ex- penditure ? There might be some pretext for''mini8ter j to keep on some of the late war taxes, after the country was placed on a peace establishment, provided there was an excess of expenditure, to make up any deficiency in balancing the accounts ; but no pre- text whatever for retaining such imposts for the prosecution of a war which appeared unnecessary. It appeared to him that tve feared the rising power (^ America^ and wished to curtail it. This was an important feature in this war, for, if persevered in, we must tfi 'Mm 1«8 Letters of William Cobbett, Esq. I jt'.i I: III be prepared to completely subjugate otir enemy, or we should be in a worse state. than we now are. We had tried to subdue America thirty years ago, and had failed, when she was uothing like so powerful as at present. We should recollect how we left France situated, whilst we were enga- ged in this contest ; she was at profound peace, recovering from her wounds, and, if the war was protracted or unprosperous, she might join America, or attack us herself. A strange policy seems to be pursued ; whilst we were waging war in America to prevent her becoming a powerful naval state, close at home, in Flanders, we were creating one. Let us recall to mind the history of the reign of Charles the Second, or, in latter times, the politics of the Dutch Cabinet previous to tLe engagement off the Dogger Bank in 1781, and the march of the Prussian army, under the late Duke of Bruns- wick, into Holland, in 1787. Would any, one having a knowledge of these transactions, believe that our ministers would, in all times to come, be able so to manage the Dutch Cabinet, as to eradicate all French influence there, as that power we are now creating may not, at no very distant time, become highly dangerous to the naval supremacy of this country. With respect to the conduct of the wur, he did not wish now to enter into it ; he was against the war altogether. In these contests we must expect the alternate vicissi- tudes of fortune. He had always understood that Sir Oeorge Prevost was both a brave and intelligent man, and, no doubt, he had good reasons for what he had done. That in a country like America, after having lost the naval support, on which depended the provisioning the army and conveyance of military stores, with the remembrance of Saratoga and York'Town, he must have been a hold man indeed who would have placed himself, by advancing into the country, in a situation to be surrounded. As to what was said in the public prints of the mortification felt by the troops which had been sent from Spain, he believed, if more confidence was placed in iheir exertions than on those of the rest of the army, we should be disappointed. In the outset of the last American war, it was boasted here that a battalion of Biitiah troops would march across the continent. The flower of our army was sent, and commanded by officers who had served with reputation in the German war under Prince Ferdinand. The result is well known ; these troops, as brave as any in the world, were compelled, at two different epochs, to lay down their arms to the new raised levies of America. He was against the continuance of the war." I agree with Sir Gilbert Heathcote in every word that he uttered. But he was almost alone. He had but one member with him. Thus, then, we are to go on with this war. A battle is to be fought now between the whole of our navy and army and those of the republic of America. She will not shy the tight. She is L^tmof l^illvm Cohhdt, Esq. 19d we ited. I him. be jhoae Ihe h ^ Madf for us. The world is iiow going to witness ihe full of the lasl r^hliCf or the decline of the naval power of England. There will be no medium after another year of war. We must , completely subjugate the Americans; or openly fall before them. We must beat them ; or they must beat us ; and the beating must last during the existence of the parties. Mr. Whitbread asked if there was now any new ground of the war. Any new object. Nobody avowed that there was. But I fear the Americans will bear in mind, that the moment Napoleon was subdued, and our alarms in Europe were at an end, our public prints, the most patronised, openly proclaimed to the nation that the object now ought to be to subdue the American republic, and to bring her back to the parent state. And, which is never to be forgotten, the whole of the London prints, in giving what they call a report of the debates in parliament, published a report of a speech, which they gave as Sir Joseph Vorke's, who was one of the lords of the admiralty, and in which reported speech it was stated that, though Napoleon was deposed, we must not yet lay aside our navy, seeing that we had another person to depose, namely, Mr. Madison. Far be it from me to assert that Sir Joseph Yorke really did utter this speech : but it is very certain that it was published as his speech in all the London newspapers ; that it was so received all over the kingdom ; and that its sentiments met with universal approbation. The language of the principal Lon- don prints has been, fiom that day to this, in perfect harmony with the tenor of this speech ; and when the news of the burning of the buildings of the city of Washington arrived, it was the com- mon notion that a viceroy was about to be sent thither to repre- sent and govern in the name of your royal father. Nay, I verily believe that, if the war ceases without our reconquering the Ame* ricans, as the chances are that it may, the people of England will be utterly astonished and confounded ! So that Jonathan must stand clear ; for we are now safely launched against him. It is, in my opinioa, idle to expect peace with America in a less space than six or seven years; for 1 am morally certain that Jonathan will not give in. lie, as Lord Melville very ji' t::nate, will urge him on to measures of prepara- tion. He is expeditious in these matters beyond all hationa upon ealrtfa. The battle will be a battle fit to engage the attention of the world. I have often been rebuked for endeavouring to draw the public attention to American affairs. I havie never been able to persuade any body that America was of any consequence/ She has now become of consequence ; and if the war goes on, as I f($ar it will, she will soon be oi most fearful impolrtance in the view of every nation in Europe. Perhaps you do not know that thep«'«"«nt injuriesi which we are! aUe to inflict on America, are the greatest of blessings in the eyei of some of her statesmen. They have always wished for some- thing that would separate her as widely as possiblt; from Great Britain. Whether wisely or not is another matter Thpy have always wished it ; and if they can see this accomplished by the . dettruction of twenty or thirty towns on the coast, tjiey ^^i^ think the acquisition wonderfully cheap. " • " When to marry or to fight," as some are^ *' both parties are equally eager; they soon come together." Both partfes are in earnest, and eager, in this case ; and they will soon reach one ano- ther, though the distance between them is so great. The battle will be a famous one. A great kingdom, the mistress of the sea, and dictatress of Europe, on the one side ; and the last of repub- lice on the other. Not only the question of maritime rights is now, to be decided ; but the question of the nature of governmenti^ Letlm qf William Cohhitt, Esq. 901 The world is now going to see whether a republici without a standing army, with half a dozen frigates, and with a chief magis- trate with a sidary of aliout fivfitkomand pounds a year, be able to contend, single-handed, against a kingdom with a thousand ships of war, an army of two hundre<^ thousand men, and with a royal fami- ly whose civil list amounts J^. more than a million pounds a year. Nothing was ever so interes^l^ as this spectacle. May the end be favourable to the honour and happiness of this country and nutn* kind in general, I am, &c. &c. Wm. Cobbbtt. w 4im m as are no- ittle sea, mb- TO A CORRESPONDENT IN AMERICA^ , On the Expenses, the Taxes, Sec* of Great Britain, eomparejit with those of America, Dear sir, Tour request would, long ago, have been attended to. It I had had more leisure for the task. For your valuable informa- tion relative to your agriculture, your flocks, and your manufac- tures, I am much obliged to you ; and if the two ccuntries were at peace, you should receive from me all the useful information which it is in my power to give you upon several heads, which I shall not touch upon in a letter passing through the press, but which, I hope, the restoration of harmony between our* two countries may, in a year or two at most, make it convenient for me to communicate to you through the ordinary channel of the post. Tou wish to know what is the amount of the annual expenses of our government ; what is the amount of the taxes paid to the government ; what is the amount of our poor redes ; what is the amount of onr tythes ; and you wish me Xo show the comparison between these and the expenses and taxes in America. You also wish to have my account of the state of the people here ; or, in {plainer terms, you wish to know how we stand as to mode of iving, and as to crimes and punishments, compared with the people of your republic. To perform this task as it ought to be performed, is, I am afraid, beyond my power. I do, indeed, know more about these matters than many of my neighbours, but I cannot hope to discharge the task to your satisfaction, who are so accurate in all your state- ments and calculations, and who, with all your indulgence in other respects, are not to be satisfied, unlets you 0nd others as 26 ;r V v«i 4-< if n m w 202^^ LeUm of miliam Cohbelt, JSvf. mr- &t SL accnrate as yourself. Neverthelesi, I will do all that t am Miv to do in return for the very valuable informat'ion which towier solely to your attentive kindness, and which servea me as a giiide through those numerous errors, with regard to your country} into #hich I see others of my countrymen continually falling* ' I am happy that you have not called upon me for opinions f that you have not called upon me for conelitsioHS^ drawn from premises that I am to state ; that you co*^ une yoUr request t6 ati account of mere Jacts ; that you have not wished to expose me to the nibrtificatioti of seeing the effort of my facts destroyed, or perverted, by the superior talents of those who might, with mer- cilesa hands, lay foul of my feeble attempts at an application of these facts to the sustaining of any political theory. It is, I per- fectly agree with you, the best and fairest way, in such a case, to- content myself with bare facts, leaving the reader, Whether public or private, to draw his own conclusions \ because the points of controversy, if any arise, can be at once decided ; and becauM that reader, who is not competent to draw just conclusions from facts clearly stated, is not worth the attention of the writer, and is of little more consequence in society than a worm or a fly. In speaking of the ]^xk>ENSE8 of ouv government, I must cdnGne myself to the annual expenses, and, in this case, to the laslt year's expenses ; that is to say, the year which ended on the 5th January, 1814. As, in the comparative part of my statement, I must speak of dollars on your side, and of pounds steHing on oMr«uie, I will, for the sake of easier assimilahon, take the dollar ntjive shillings, instead otfoUt shillings and six peticty which i« its real sterling value. But the state of our paper currency will fully justify this advance ; and, indeed, it would justify a further advance. This, hoiwever, is not material enough to induce fHpto enter into any laboured calculations on the subject ; especially, as it is contended here, by a great majority of the government ilinanciers, that our paper money has undergone no depreciation at all. To begin, then, with the expenses of om: government : In Great Britain only, for the year ending on the 5th of January, 1814, the total sum expended was 113,968,6102. 168. lO^d. I speak from documents laid before the house of commons, and, therefore, I run no risk of error or contradiction. This was the' total sum, exclusive of the expenditure belonging to Ireland. To go into a detaily as to. the several particulars, would fill five or six numbers of my Reuister; but the great heads of the expen- dilure it may be worth your while to know. These were as follow :. Ldlm of William €!obbett, Esq, 293 keat 814, )eak bre, sum, into six tpen- as ^41,897.3M 17 S 34 1,021,000 234,937 10 7 1-3 339,413 7 4 14 113,176 4 8 1-3 8 Navy, ..... 31,990,634 9 4 1-3 Ordnance, .... .8,404,537 U 11 Armv, . • ... . 29,469,530 10 3 Bemittanees to other eountries^ Hanover, Austria, Prussia, and nine other powers, • • • 15,994,833 14 1 Misoellaueoas services at home and abroad, . 4,010,349 18 4 1-2 Deduct sums for Ireland, &e. Total expenditure of Great Britain, 118,873,81.i a 1 i.' ^ Amongst other deductions from this latter sum, there was the sum of 3,504,938l> 1 U. bd. deducted from the gross receipt, or collection, for the purpose of paying the ** charges for ma- l^gement;" that is to say, for the purpose of paying the pei^ eons employed in the assessing, the supervising, the surveying, the inspecting, the collecting, the receiving, the transmitting, &c. of money paid into the treasury. Now, 3,504,938/. lis, bd,h ^ 1 4,0 1 9,7 54. So that the bare expense of the getting together of our taxes amounts, you see, to very nearly as much as the nkoh of your taxes raised upon you ; that is to say, if Mr. Madison's statement be correct* And suppose each of these persons, one witb the other, to receive 50/. or ^200 a year, here a e wages for 70,098 men constantly employed in the business c . the taxes } while, suppose you to pay your tax-gatherers at the same rate, you have only 2,504 persona constantly employed in this way. The poor rates form another item of English taxation, in addi* lion to the above ; and a very important item it is now become. If you do not know the nature of this tax, and of its application, it may be necessary to state, that this is a tax levied upon all house- holders and landholders, for the support of such persons as are too poor to support themselves. It is assessed and collected by per- sons appointed by the taxed people in each parish, called overseers of the poor ; but before they can proceed to collect any rate, they must have the approbation of a justice of the peace, who is, as they all are, appointed by the crown. In the distribution of this money, the overseers are again liable to the control of the justices of the peace ; for they may, upon the application of any pauper, order, without appeal, the overseers to relieve the said pauper, in any manner that they please. This, therefore, is a tax not paid i. £l,7«0,S18 S,16r,749 9,447,SUS .BttAi)^** Waltham In the year 1776, 1784, 1803, 670'* 1,59S| Xi is quite surprising to observe how exact are these propor^ iions i how regularly this parish kept pace, for twenty-seven ^ears, with the whole nation in the increase of its poor rates. But> m order to leave no room for cavil on this head, the subject being one of the utmost importance, we will proportion this parish accord- ing to its population: had of pattperst in 1803, there being no Recount of the nation's number of paupers previous to 1803, and there being no likelihood that we shall ever see another, ^ England and fFale». Population, . 8,879,980 Paupers, • 1,356,357 exeluuve of persoBi ia alau houses. Bhhop't Waltham. Population, - 1773 Paupers, - it36 1 Now, if you multiply the paupers by «efen, in both instancea* ^ou will find that they amount to nearly the whole of the popu- lation, making it appear that, in 1 803, there were nearly one pauper to every seven persons in the parish of Bishop's Waltham, as well as throughout England and Wales. It was said, in our news'- V I ":: > M '-^■ m '&\m 206 Letien of WUliam OohbeH, Esq, ( iii'i m papen, that the emperor pf Russia, and the king of Prvmia} ex* Sressed their surprise at seeing no poor peoph in England. If lis was true, it was clear that their uiajesties did not look in the TTiaiM pltues. We now come to the result- The poor rates in Bishop's Waltham parish, instead of the 1,696/. to which they amounted in jiSOa, amounted Uut year to 2,3652. 18«. ii\d. as I know from the pour book now lying before me, and of which sum I myaelf paid more than lOOi. or ||400. If, therefore, this crite- rion be a good one, nnd such, I think, it cannot be denied to be; if, in 1»03, Bishop's Wahham oaid 1,6»52 , while England and fVales paid 6,34U,206/., England and Wales must, /asfvear, have paid r,U96,656/., seeing that Bishop's Wullham paid, ni thesam* year, 2,366/., throwing aside the shillings, pence, and farthings. I return, then, to my former statement, that the poor rates alone of England and Wales, exclusive of Scotland, (where, however* there is something paid in support of the poor,) amounts to mor« than double the sum which was last year (a ^ear of great expense) paid by the whole of the population of America into the treaauryy in taxes of all sorts, direct and indirect. Then comes another question; namely, what is the relative pOF pulation of the two countries ? I have not the account of your last census at hand. I think it made your total population amount to between seven and eight millions. At this time I cannot sup* pose it to be less *!ian eight millions. Take, then, the 6,348,205/'. of poor rates, in 1U03, observing that then there were 1,266,357 paup rs, and you will find that we must have now upwards of 1»H00,000 paupers, provisions being at this time as cheap, if not cheaper, than they were in 1U03. Peduct, therefore, from the 8,872,980 (the population of England and Wdes) the 1,800,000 paupers, and then there are left to pay the 7,896,666/. of poor rates, only 7,072,980 persons, including women and children* The paying* population, as to poor rates, is, at any rate, smaller than the population of your republic ; and the sum paid exceeds, as I have before stated, twice the amount o(thi nhote of the taxes of every sort which you paid last year into the treasury of the United States, if Mr. Madison's statement be correct. Turning towards another view of this interestbig subject, we perceive that, if we exclude the paupers, as we rationally must, the poor rates alone amount to more than one pound ^erling, or four dollars a head, on the whole of the population of England and Wale». Our poor rates alone amounted to this on the whole of our population ; while., according to Mr. Madison's account, the whole of the taxes ol' every sort paid into the treasury of the United States, do not amount to more than two dollars a head on your population, even supposing your population to be pow little more than seven millions. Lttttrs of Wittiam Cobbau Esq, 20r the (1 OD little The tvikes form another part of our taxes. I do not hoean to Speak or them, as some moat loyal men do, as being peculiarly odious ; or, indeed, as being 6dious at all, either in their nature, or the mode of their collection, in which latter 1 have never expe« rieuced any thing severe or vexatious ; nor do I believe that, as far •8 the clergy are the owners of the tythes, (for they do not owo more than about the half of them,) their rate, or collection, is ofteil severe, or unfair, or even troublesome. Still, however, the tythet Whkch' Arthur Young, in 1792, estimated at 5,000,000/. in Eng- land and Wales, must t>e looiced upon as so much money raised upon thh land ; and certainly it would not be raised if there were no rsta- blished church, no state religion. In short, the tythes, as far r«t the clergy are the receivers, must be looked upon as so much motley received and expended by the government ; so much mo< n^y given by the government to a description of persons eminent- ly calculated to repay it in support. Nevertheless, I will not in- clude the tythes among the taxes of the nation. Lord Sheffield, indeed; he who predicted in his book, published in 1783, that you would soon wish to return to your allegiance^ which, as he made it out, would be found necessary to your very existence as a people ; that same Lord Sheffield, in a speech to a meeting of Wool-growers, lately reckoned tythes among the causes of our far- nierS*^ being unable to maintam a competition with thosie of neighbouring conntries. I do not give so much weight to tythes ; but, ^till, it must not be forgotten ; and when a report to the house of commons, made in 1 itOS, states the whole rental of the kingdom of Great Britain at twenty-eight millions, you will perceive that if we take the tythes at Mr. Arthur Young's estimate, of 1792, the tythes amount to more than a sixth of the whole rental. Indeed, tiiey must amount to a great deal more ; because the tythe con- sists of a tenth of the whole of the produce of a farm ; and, of course, it is a tenth of the rent, the labour, the taxes, the capital, the manure, and all other outgoings ; and of the profits into the bargain. So that the tylhes of the produce cannot, I should sup- pose, be less than a/ouW/t of the reutal ; and, of course, that they amoun>: to about 7,000,000^. in England and Wales, at this time; Scotland paying no tythes. But, then, it must be observed, that the €lmrch does not receive more than the half of this sum. The rest is the property of lay-persons. It is, in fact, private proper- ty, and is sold, ,or rented, as other private property is. Upon the subject of tythes, therefore, I shall not enter into any comparison between your country and ours. All the world knows that you have no tythes, and no compulsory payments, on account of religion of any description ; all the world .knows that the Episcopalians, the Quakers, the Catholics, the Presbyterians^ the Baptists, the Lutherans, the C^Ivinists, the Moravians, the Dunkards, the Swenfelders, the Seceders, the Uoitarians, the 308 LelUn qf WUliam Cobbdtt iStifm Swedenburgeri, and inAoy other deicriptioni of Chriitiini, eicb condemning iba opir.ioDi of all the otheri ; together with J«wa and Oeiita, who laugh' at the whole of them; have their asiembliee b jrour country ; and that anj one of them, or even of Atbeiiti, may Income your preiidenti vice-president, or a member of the cougreii, without any queition being ailted him with regard to hit religion ; while it i« equally well known, that no man can be a ow giitratjB, or fill any olBce of truit, in England, unieii he firat give » U»t of hit bein^ a member of the eitabliihed church, the head of which church la the king, who haa the abiolute appointment of all the biihopi and deani, and of the greater part of the beneficed prieata. Theae facta being merely mentioned, I need add no- thing further on the aubject, except that we have many peraooi puniahed in England for pubiishing worka on the aubject of reli- gion, wliile you have no auch puniahmenta ; and we have recently aeen a man imprisoned for eighteen months, and put in the pillory, for republishing a work here which had been first publianed in your country. Which system is best, and which worst, it is not my present object to inquire. My business, upon this occasion, ia merely to state facts which no one can deny, leaving it to tho reader to form opinions and draw conclusions. We will now, then, return to the tox««, which we will take in the aggregate, on both sides of the Atlantic ; and then, taking the popu^ion of each country, we shall see how much we pay per head, and how much you pay per head. There must be a little confusion here, in our part of the statement, because wo have regular poor rates, by law, in England and Wales, while Scotland has no such law, though there are collections there also for the support of the poor. This, however, cannot be accurately come at. I will, therefore, leave it wholly out, and look upon the poor rates of England and Walea as raised upon the whole of Great Britain. I. will here leave out the ahilhngs, pence, and farthings. GHS\T BRITAIN. Amount of taxM paid into the treaauty. Paid to the tax-gatherer* for oolleoUon or uanaKementi Aiaouat of poor tax0% ToUH £r4,037,8l» 3,504,938 7,890,55C £88,440.077 or, 2341,716,308 But now, iu taking the aggregate of your taxes, you will see the necessity of my including those which are raised upon the people iu the several sttttes for the support of the several state govenunentst which taxes, of course, form an addition to the taxes paid to the general government of the United States. ^ My materials for aacertaining the amount of theae state taxes la not lAtlm ^ WmUm Cobhtth Etq, fi#9 see I the the My not tifle 'w*^mA M I could whh. Y«t I have meani to do It t» the BAliafartion of any one whoae obiect it (hat of arriving at (ruth, lb I dOA, Benjamin Daviei, of Philadelphia, a man of grea( reaearch •0(1 of treat accuracy, published, io M% '* New SyHtem of Oe«^ graphy/' an account of tlkn revenues and expeniea of eight of the •tatea ; correct informatioA fW>m the other atates, on this head, not fcieipg appArendy at his cCttAnand, o: within his reach. Thii, bof ever, .is quite sotttiient for our purpose ; for no reaaonable ^an will suppose that these eight slates, and those the principat ones, do not furnish a fair criterion whereon to found an estimatt o( tbe whole. His account stands as follows, io dollars and c«nff« or hundredths of a dollar. ^iSTiLTM. Varmont. JifHMtohUMtti, ConnaoUout, mv.York, ' AlBryMnd Virginia, fund, nia, 8oatta«0ar8 Ij: .1/ — — — ,, f It appeafs from Benjamin Davies' at^couilt, (hat these tUxiei, dj^, V%ther, these resources, arise, in many cases, from the interest of llitock, of which the states are the owners, arid which make part of the public debt in America. Tn other cases, they arise IroDi the sate of lands belonging to the states. He represents "New- York state to be owner of 2,000,000 of dollars in stock, add to hold numerous shares in canals, &c. &c. But 1 shall suppose that the whole of this sum is raised in taxes upon the people, and fiaid 6at of their pocicets. It will then come to this, that each yihabitant of (he American republic pays, in this way, and on this account, 26 5-8 centSy or hundredths of a dollar. > You have also, in the great towns, some poor to assist. I am quite in the dark upon this head, except as far as observation of some yeafa ago can guide me. This item, therefore, I will take at a guess ; and, if I allow that the poor cost nearly as muck as the sUtte gavemmentSt no one on this Hide of the wa(er, at any ra(e, can complain of the estimate. I therefore take the state taxeSf including poor taxes, at 50 cents^ or half a dollar a head, Qpon the whole of yowr population. I know that you will say that this is a monstrous over-rate as to your poor taxes. But I am resolved not to be complained of ori the other side. As tb 27 I h'- *^^;1'^H :/i I i tio UlUn qf WUliam Cohhettt Etq. roadnU9»t twmp^eat wMtcking and ligMingt and pavmg and WtUermgt of citits and lofftt«, I do not notice these in eithet countrj, seeing that tbejr are for the immediate benefit of thoee who pay them. We will now return to our comparison between the distribuliooy per head, of our taxes and of youri. Our year's taxes, including poor taxes, we find amounting to 34 1 ,r 1 6,aQ8 dollars. Our population in Great Biritain, In 1 803, was as follows : England tnd Wakii, Beotland, • AriUT and navy, ConnoU in Uie hulki, Dednot arny and navy, Dednet eonvieta on board the hulki^ D^doet pauperii 409,ltt Total* 10>S1,SS8 10,483,150 1,410 10,480,r40 i.sorvxip ii,eao,74o I make no deduction for prisoners in our jails, whether for crimes or debts ; though, as I shall, with sorrow, have to state, bjr and by, these are worthy of very serious notice, even in the comparative view which we are now making. I suppose that I shall not be contradicted when I say, ths^t it is impossible, upon any rational ground, to include soldiers, sailors, convicts* and Saupers, amongst th^ payers of taxes ; and that, therefore, the eductions which I have made will be allowed to be necessary to the correctness of the comparison. But to get rid of the chance of a cavil bejng raised \ to put it out of the power of any human bein| to object to my basis, I will distribute our taxes amongst the wbo;le of the population, and will even take that population at Its amount previous to the enormous emigration of natives, and re- emigration of foreigners, which the peace on the continent of Burope has produced. Taking the whole of the population of tireat Britain, therefpre, at 10,951,338, it appears that, for each person, old and young, male and female, there were taxes paid, last year, to the amount of thirty-one dollars atid tmetdy cents ; (throwing aw«^ a fraction ;) or, in sterling money of England, ft. 16«. This, you will observe, is for every soul, whether pau- per, soldierj sailor, debtor, convict, or other criminal. On your side I will take the population, of every description, at only 7,500,000, though it is notoriously much more. xour United States* taxes, last year, amounted to |tl4>dA0,00p, whifih, ^LeHiTB of mUiam Cobhttf, Htq. 21 1 ithtribnted amongRt yodr 7,900,000 jH^pfe', impoMs upon eftcb a Nttle leaa than $2\ and if we add the taxes of the state governmeilfs, an^J (he largely estimated poor taxes as aboVe^ each person in your republic paid last year, including every spe- cies of tax, the sum of |^2 £0, or Iff. 6d. of our money, rHil^, as we have just seen, there was paid in Great Btltain, for «)vei y soul, including soldiers, sftilors, paupers, debtors, convicts and crlninala in pT*qon, the sum of $81 30 ; or 71. 6*. of our money* Really (for I must break out a little here) Mr. Mtkdison does appear to have boasted betimes of the fortitude of your people ; of the cheerfulness with which they bear the burdens which the war imposes on them j of their giving the taxes, direct and indi- reet, with promptness and alacrity ! Let him, before he talks in this way, put the people into our state of trial. Let him try the whole population, man, woman, and child, pauper, soldier, sailtftr, debtor, convict and criminal prisoner, with thirty-one dollars and twenty cents each, instead of two paltry dollars and a half; and tlun let him talk< if he likes, of their fortitude and patriotisau Our lords and gentlemen, in our honourable houses, talk, indeed, with good grounds, of our unexampled patience under our burdeM* This compliment, which parliaments in former times seldom be- stowed on our and your forefathers, and which, to acknowledge the truth, they as seldom merited, is fully due to us. But, really, Mr. Madison has begun a little too soon to compliment hii fellow- citizens on their quufity of bearing burdens. Their twelve-and- lixpenny patience will be thought very little of on this side of the water, where we bear, taking paupers, soldiers, and all, elevm times as mmh without even a whisper in the way of complaint. There was, indeed, a few years ago, a man by the name of Gartor, in Staffordshire, who published an article which was understood to contain a censure on his majesty's commissioners of property tax in that county ; but he was soon led to feel sorrow for his con- 'duct ; and, since that, the country has not been disgraced by one 'tingle soul found to follow the evil example, or to be in the like Case offending. Mr. Madison says, that bis fellow citizens will proudly bear their burdens. But can they bear them so proudly as we have borne, and still bear, ours ? Has he heard of the bon- fires, the ringing of bells, the roasting of sheep and of oxen, the feasts, the balls, and the singing parlies, which took place whilst the kings, our friends in the war, were here last summer ? Has he heard of the joy at the sight Of the exhibition in the Green Park, and that of the sham naval fight on the Serpentine River, which formed so apt a representation of Lake Champlain and its outlet ? Mr. Madison must come hither (and the Times news- paper expects to have him here) before he can form the most dis- tant idea of the extent and value o( our patience and loyalty. The sum which one good farm pays here, in the various kinds of taxes, r '1H '< • ■ i ,, -,1 II i r- •:^ i 'i > -i It 1 1 i i hi l.l'J Si- itii" Hi I; 212 Lefteri of William Cohbettf Esq. would, if attempted to be coUected in America, set a whole tow»- . ship, if not a whole count/i of your grudging republicans in mutif hy ; and compel the magistrate to call out the horse soldiers, if there were any at his command. Let us hear no more, therefore^ of Mr. Madison's twelve-and-sixpenny patience. Let us hear no more of his boasts of the fortitude of his republicans, until their fortitude makes somewhat of a nearer approach towards ours. t«i> If you will excuse this digression, into which, you will confesf^^ I was so naturally led, not to say dragged, I will now return to luy statement of tacts, proceeding next to a view of the crimes and punishments in this country. As to our criminal code^ you, who are a lawyer, know full at much about it as I do, except as far as relates to the experience in cases of libel. It h merely of the number and descriptiou of crimes and punishments that f am now about to speak : and, as ia other cases, I shall not deal in vague surmises or general obsjrva* tions, but appeal to authentic reports, and build my statements on the unerring rules of arithmetic. Sir Samuel Romilly, who has for many years been labouring to effect a softening ot' our criminal code, caused, in the year 1811, an account to be laid before par- liament of the crimes and punishments, as far as they came before the judges, for several years preceding. Owing to some cause, with which I am not acquainted, the account came no lower down than the year 1809; and it extended no further than England and Wales, leaving out Scotland, where, as I am told, there are in tact but very few crimes and punishments, though the sheriffs and other officers of justice in that country are pretty expensive, and are paid out of what is called the civil list. The summary of the account, of which I have spoken above, is as follows : Committed for trial, . . . Convicted, .... Sentenced to suffer death, <^— — — to be transported, ' to be imprisoned^ whipped, fined, &c. Aotually put to death, . . Pertana. . 275il . 1573 . 372 . 401 800 57 Beside these, you will observe, there are all the persons ]who were tried at the quarter sessions in the several counties ; that is to say, the sessions held by the jVrStices of the peace, four times in every year, where as m^ny of the justices as choose to attend form the court, having one of their own body for chairmaisi. At these sessions the offences of a less heinous nature are exau)ined into and punished. But the justices can sentence to imprisonment, whip' Ldten of Wiliiam Cobbettt Esq. 213 *|k pi^tfi^t *nd, I believe, they can transport. This is the great court for the trial of persons charged with thefts of an inferior or- der; and, I should suppose, that the number of criminals brought before these courts is twice as great as that of the criminals who are reserved for trial before the judges, who go into some counties but once in the year, and into none, except Middlesex, more thaa twice I whereas, the court of quarter sessions is held every three iQonths. However, as I cannot speak here from any authentic document, I shall leave this as a thing whereon for you to exercise your judgment. As to any comparison on this point, between our country and yours, I am wholly destitute of any authentic document, relative to America, touching crimes and punishments. I can, however, ■peak as far as my own observation went. I lived in Philadelphia about eight years, with every disposition to find fault with every thing that I saw, or heard of, that was amiss. During that time, I never heard of any person, except in one instance, being tried for his or her life ; I never heard of a murder, a highway robbery, or of a house being broken open ; I never heard of an execution of death on any person, except (the instance above alluded to) of three men hanged, on (he banks of the Delaware, for piracy and murder; these men were foreigners; and such was the horror of an execution, even in such a case, that the executioner was obliged to be disguised in such a way that it was impossible that any one should recognise either his person or features, being brought to the spot in a carriage, under an escort of constables, anti taken away in a similar manner, so as to make it almost im- possible for him to become publicly known* Philadelphia, at the time I speak of, contained about 70,000 inhabitants. ^,^. It is, as I observed before, impossible to come at any exact state- ment on this subject, in the way of comparison ; but a few facts, notorious on the two sides of the water respectively, will serve to aid you greatly in forming your opinions as to this matter. Here we have laws to guard our turnip fields from robbery, and very necessary they are ; for without them there is no man in any part of the country who could depend on having the use of hi» crop even . of that coarse and bulky article. To steal corn out of a field af- ter it is cut, is punished with death by our laws; and if we had fields of IndiiEm corn, as you have, which is a delightful food for several weeks before it is ripe, I cannot form an idea of the means that would be necessary to preserve it from being carried away. As to poultry f no man in England has the smallest expectation of being able ever to taste what he raises, except he carefully locks it up in the night, and has dogs to guard the approaches to the hen-roost. In America, at within ten or twelve miles of Philadel- phia, it is a common practice of the farmers to turn the flocks of turkeys into tltt rvaods ia the latter end of August ; there to re- • i mv 5tl4 Ldtersqf mHiam <%bbiit, fi^. maio until towards winter, when tiiey return half fat. A farmer in England would no more think of doing' thn than he would think of depositing his purse in any of the public foot-paths across his fields. In order to preserve their fences, the farmers sometimes resort to this experiment: they bore holes into the stoutest of the ■takes, which sustain their hedges; put gunpowder into those holes ; then drive in a piece of wood very tightly upon the poW' der; so that the stolen hedge, iu place of performing its office -of boiling the kettle, dashes it, and all around it, to pieces. This mode of preserving fences I first heard of at Alresford^ a town about twelve miles distance from Botley ; and though it certainly does appear, at first sight, a very cruel one, what is a man to do ? The thieves are so expert as to set detection at defiance ; and there is nothing but his fences between him and ruin. I have known a man who assured me, that, by the stealing of his hedge in the month of March, and letting into his wheat land the flocks from the commons, he lost more than 300^ in one night and part of the ensuing day. A few weeks ago 1 myself had a jire, by which I lost a couple of barns, and some other buildings. At this fire a numerous crowd was assembled, many of whom came for the pur- pose of rendering assistance ; but one man was detected, while the fire was yet raging, stealing the lead and iron work of a pumpi fulfilling the old saying, that nothing is too hot or too heavy for a thief; and it required the utmost of my resolution and exertion, aided by three sons, and a half a dozen resolute and faithful ser- vants, to preserve, during the night and next day, (which was Sunday,) the imperishable and portable part of the property from being carried away. I will just add upon this subject, as an in- stance of the baseness of our press, that the Times newspaper published, upon this occasion, a paragraph, stating that I had most ungratefully driven away " the honest rustics^* who had kindly come to my assistance. It is. very true that I ^id drive the " honest rustics" away; but I succeeded in putting a stop to their thefts, which would, I verily believe, have been nearly as inju- rious as the fire. Since the fire happened upon my premises, a gentleman, who had a similar accident some few years ago, has assured me, that almost every article of iron was stolen from his premises. It is notorious that, in London, the thieving forms a very considerable part of every such calamity. But the thing which better than any other bespeaks the nature of our situation, in this respect, is the exhibition of notices on the top of garden walls, and of other fences, menacing those who enter with the danger of death from man traps and spring guns. Peter Pindar has im- mortalized these by introducing them into a poem, where he ludi- crously represents the king as intent upon " catching his living subjects by the legs." But he must have Well known, that, with- out them, neither king nor subject could possess the produce of a m Xictfers of: FilUatn Cohhettt Esq, MS Ai.'il )m his garden. ' SoiBethnes the trapa themaelvea tan hokrfcd up upon a sort of gibbet, in the day tim(« in order to inspire greater terror ; and it is only a few months rgp that we had an account of a man being actually killed by a spring gun, in a nocturnal expedition in a garden at Mitcham. Beside these, we are infested by gangs of itinerant thieves, called gypsies. The life of these people verjp much resembles that of the savages whom I have seen on the bor* ders of the river St, Johtit in New-Brunswick; except that the latter gain their food by hunting and fishing, and the former by thieft. The gypsies have no settled home; no house, or hut, or place of dwelling. They have asses, which carry themselves, their children, their kettle, and their means of erecting tents, and which tents are precisely like those of the North American sa- vages. The nights they employ in thieving. Sheep, pigs, poul- try, a$eo, roots, fruit ; nothing comes amiss to them. What they' steal in one place, they spend in another; and thus they proceed all over the country. They commit acts of murder, and theft, and arson, innumerable. The members of this moving community are frequently hanged, or transported ; but still the troops of vaga- bonds exist; and, as far as I am able to judge, are as numerous as they were when I was a boy. But still the great evil, in this view of the subject, is the want of honesty in the labouring class, to what- soever cause that evil is to be ascribed. Those writers on rural affairs, who have urged the employing of threshing machines for cornt have counted, amongst the greatest of their advantages, that they protected the farmer against the thefts of the thresher. Va- rious are the ways in which corn is stolen by those who thresh it; but I will content myself with one, the information with regard to which I derived from a respectable neighbour. He perceived that his thresher brought a large wooden bottle with him to work every day. Being winter time, he could not conceive what should make the man so very tbirsty. He watched him : never saw him drink. At last he accosted him in his way home, and after some altercation, insisted upon examining the bottle, which he found to be full of wheat. Thus was this man taking away three gallons of wheat every week, which, at that time, was not worth less than six shillings. It was this, I believe, and this alone, which made my neighbour resolve to use a threshing machine. Such is by no means an overcharged view of our situation in this respect. Of the causes which have led to it I shall not speak ; indeed, I do not know that I am competent. That it is not owing to a want of penal laws is very certain. I am unable to say whe- ther your country, at this time, be better or worse situated as to this matter. At any rate, I shall enable you to make the com- parison ; and as such comparisons, if clearly and candidly made, might be of great use to the people of both countries, I think it is not (oo much for me to hope that you, in the public manner of ^ #11 liom CbMed, Af. 21D which I am giviag yon an example, will c^mmiinicste the compa- risoo to me. But, if you can do it, let us have mtthmtic doctc- ments. It would be perfectly easy to obtain >k>year'a account of ail the commitments, xonvictiom, and lenteiices in your <«public. I should not fear executing such a task with an expeMe of twenty dollars ; and, as the execution of it would give to tit* world a piece of the most interesting and mosi* valuable infermatiM, h will not fear that you, who have all the means in your hands^ will dteeKne to undertake it. If you do undertake it, I know that yor will execute it with a strict adherence to truth;' and, if so caeciited, it must be productive of great good. Both countries must profit from it, especially if peace should happily be restored betwemi them. .^wto'wt rv^Aa to the mode of living in this ooantry, compai«d«to«|lte mode of living in your republic, I cannot in this letter eomr'-lijit- to the inquiry, which would take up more room than I have tt present, and also much move time. It is, however, a most iots- restfng subject ; because it speaks, at once^ to the great object for which civil society was framed ; namely, the happiness of the pto- fU, Even now, however, I cannot refrain from giving you a no> tion of the manner in which our lahowrerB live. 1 am, strange as k may seem, enabled to appeal to parliameniartf ati^hsority here tlso. Theie is now before me a report of a committee of the bouse of commons on the subject of the corn laws. This commit- tse report the evidence of certain persons examined by them ; and, amongst the rest, of a great landholder in Wiltshire^ nam«d ]Bennett, who, upon beins: nsked how much a labourer and his fe< mily ought to have to h'-c upon, answered : *' We catcolate that every person in a labourer's family should have, per wuk, the price of a gallon loaf, and three pence over for^^din^and clothing, exclusive of house rent, sickness, and casual expenses." This report was ordered by the house of commons to be printed, oc the 26th of July last. Now, ** a gallon loaf " weighs, according to law, 8lb. lOoz, avoirdupois weight This is the allotment for seveii days for one person; but, then as you will perceive, Mr. Bennett and his neighbours allow threepence, or five cents a week more, or suppose a cent per day more, for feeding and elothing. The particulars of the feeding and clothing that Can be had for three pence per week, or thirteen shillings a year, it woufd, perhaps, be difficult to ascertain, without immediate application to Mr. Bennett; and as that is out of my power, I must leave these par* ticulars to be come at by your powers of divination ; adding, how* ever, that as far as my observation has reached, Mr. Bennett's ac* count appears to have been tolerably correct. I am, with sincere esteem, your friend, Wm. C6BBf!TT« Botley, England, Novvmber 19, 1814. Ltdan qfWillvm Cohbat, Esq* m BtATE O^ titB KATI61». Mr, Cohbett, So, sir, there is sad news from America ! We aire Udt merely repulsed with loss and slaughter, by a set of ragamuffint without red coats \ but we «lso lose our brave, our gallant, our hu- mane, and generous officers. As to the common men being killed, that is nothing ; they are only numbered, not named ; whereas our officers are always the very best of their species ; so that the Ame- ricans, in shooting them, are guilty of great presumption, beside downright murder, and a most grievous loss it is to Britain. Th6 shooting a few more o( our officers, by those plaguy smock-frock* ed riflemen^ may aisp prove a material protraction to our recolo* niziiig the continent of America. I should^ therefore^ be of opi- nbn,4bat our officers ought to disguise themselves as they did du- ring the last war { for these impudent riflemen are so accustomed to shoot their wild turkeys^^^ng', that it will be impossible for it single officer to escape, if they once recognise him. This consideration alone is sufficient to compel the ministry to leave America unconquered, and patch up a peace ; unless, indeed, our interest in the now sitting congress of the legitimate proprie- tors of the human race, be so great as to cause it to be enacted, that, henceforward, in warfare, it shall be against the law of nations to fire at, wound, or slay^ any officer bearing his Britannic majesty's commission. But while we thus compbin of the passing events abroad, let us endeavour to remedy some of the abuses at home. It is an undeniable fact, that we groan under an immense load of taxes, which scarcely leave to the many the means of procuring the necessaries of life. We exhibit to the astonished world the spectacle of a/ree nation, paying double the sum in taxes of any other country, under the most arbitrary and despotic government, and our protecting parliament loads free-born Britons with heavier burthens than all the ukases of an autocrat imposes on the servile Russian. Yet a very great proportion of these taxes go towards the support of those who govern f and without entering at present into a disquisition as to the mode or profusion in which the mem- bers of and adherents to, government are paid, me must insist that a certain indispensable duty attaches to them in return for the large salaries they receive from the public, and that to the public they are amenable, who, at the same time, are competent to judge whether that indispensable duty be neglected or inadequately performed. With the public also a power to remove, or punish, exists ; and, therefore, all endeavours to recall such sei;vants back to their 28 1;..,! J-f'll ■ing begin. The T^tH^iSnH (he CtMri^ have been endeavonring to entettain them for a long while, and until they, as well as the audience, appear exhanated. BVit is it not reasonable that the public should, in this case, as well as in *li others, put down their money preriously to the drawing up of Ihifr-eortain f In a year or two, perhaps, we shall see the drama commence in good earnest. But is it not enough to be amused with a little dancing and tumbling on the outside before we have paid our money ? ** Send I send away,*' says the eager editor of the Timea, ** send away a force to eruah them at once !" But not a word does he say about the taxes necessary to pay fbr the '•eiidiDg and keeping up of such a force. ' Our government is composed of wonderfully clever men; but 'tiiey are not clever enough to make soldiers walk upon the waters over the Atlantic, nor to enact, at a word, loaves and fishes (b sustain them after their arrival. To be able to send that "over- whelming force," of which the Times speaks, the government 'WUSt have money ; and, as irt all other cases, they must have the' money ^f9^ In short, it is unreasonable in the extreme to expect the war in America to be attended with any very signal ^fiesialt, until we have liberally paid two or three years of taxes. The assertion is again made, that the American ships are manned principally with English^ Irish^ and Scotch, I find this assertion in the Morning Chronicle of the 6th instant. If this were true, Is I hope it is not, what a pleasant and honourable fact this w^r Iroald have brought to light ? No other than this : that many of iMir seamen, our " gallant tars," the " undaunted sons of Neptune," Dot only have no dislike to the Americans, but actually have run th^ risk of being hanged, drawn and quartered, for the sake of fighting in the American service against their own country ! If the world believe these accounts, what must the world think of us ? During the long war in which France was engaged, no Frenchmen were ever found in arms against their king and coun- try. Some of them, indeed, embodied themselves under foreign banners to fight, as they pretended, at least, for their country, and against those whom they called the usurpers of its govern- ment. But, if these accounts be true, our countrymen have volun- tarily gone into the American service to fight against their coun- try, that country being under the legitimate sway of the glorious And beloved house of Brunswick ! The origin of these accounts, 'so disgraceful to the country, is, probably, the relactance which bur naval officers have to confess defeat at th? hands of those Yankees whom we were so desirous to see drubbed. To avoid tiiis painful acknowledgment, it has been asserted, that we have not been beaten by the Yankees, but by our own brave country- men. But here, again, a difiScuUy arises : for how comes it to pass that our owo brave countrymen have more success on board f ' P ' m I £22 Letters of William CobbeHt £f^M^ Yankee ibipi than on board of our own btart of oak ? How coqim it to pMi tkati the men on both i»dei being precisely of the aamtt race and education, those in the Yankee ships should beat thoss in " the wooden walls of Old England V It' has been observed* that thej fight more desperately » knowing that they fight with a halter about tluir necka. What an aspersion on ** the sons of Neptune!" As if the sons of Neptune, the gallant jack tars of Old England* wanted a halter around their necks, and the gallows and executioner's knife before their eyes, to make them do more m battle than they are ready to do for the sake of their king and country, and from a sentiment of honour ! This is, really, giving a cruel stab to the character of our sailors ; but such is the lorrj malignity of those who publish these accounts of treasonable prac- tices, that they entirely overlook these obvious inferences, in their anxiety to get rid of the supposition that any thing praiseworthy belongs to the character of the enemy. If these accouotd be true, as I hope they are not, why are not the traitorit tr^cC and executed ? Why are they suffered to re- main in the American service? Why are they suffered to go oil thus, shouting at, boarding, and taking our l^ipB, insulting our gal- lant officers, and putting our men in irons ? Why are they nor, I ask again, tried and hanged ? Why are not their warm bowels ripped out, and thrown in their traitorous faces ? Why are their bodies not cut into quarters, and those quarters placed at the kmg's disposal ? — But, I had forgotten, that before these things can b« done, we must capture the ships in which they sail ! Is there no olh^T way of coining at them ? It were well if those, whose busi* ness it is to enforce the law against state criminals, would fall upon some scheme to reach them. Cannot the parliament, which has been called omnipotent, find out some means of coming at them ? In short, these accounts are a deep disgrace to the country ; and I do hope, that the lords of the admiralty, who published that elo« quent paper, stimulating the sailors to fight againut the Americans, will fall speedily upon some means of putting an end to so great a scandal. I have not time, at present, to enter so fully into the subject of the American war as I shall in my next ; but, to the loose observations that I have made, I cannot refrain from adding a word or two on the rupture of the negotiations at Ghent, which is said to have taken place. Who, in bis senses, expected any other result ? It was manifest, from the moment that Napoleon was removed from France, that the war with America was destined to become ^ serious contest. There were all sorts of feelings at work in favour of such a war. There was not a single voice {mine only excepted) raised against it. Was it to be supposed, then, that peace would be the work of a few months ? Yet this rupture of the negotiations appears to have excited a good deal of 289 Jjtikrt qf WUlitm Gohhett, Kiq> MirpffM#, tnt wholly devMtM of a imall portkm of Blam. It expected that the Yankee commiMioBera would jump at peace on aoy terms. I'here were thousanda of penons, aod well*dretfled peraona, too, who aaid that the Yankees would not heaitate a moment to depose Mr. Madison, and aeod him to some little anin- habited island. About a f~^rtoight ago aome rifle soldiers were passing my house, ou their way from Suaaex to Plymouth, to join their corps, bonnd to America. A sergeant, who was at a little diatance behind the party, stopped at my door and asked for some beer. While the beer was drawing, I observed to him, that JonO' than must take care now what he was about. " No,'\ saiti the sergeant, " I do not think it will come to any head ; for we letrn- ed, the day before yesterday, that MadUon had run anay.** I aaked him if they had been informed nhUher he had run to, i^e replied, that be had run " out of the country." Ke further told me, that we were to have an army of 50,000 men for the conquest of America; and that, if they were not enough, Russia had 60,000 men ready to send to our assistance. From this the Ame- ricana will judge of the opinions of the people here ; for I dare say that this sergeant was no more than the %iere repeater of what he heard :n almost all the public houses, resorted to by politicians of the most numerous class— but the people are not to be blamed for this delusion. They had it given them, in the report of a speech of one of the lords of the admiralty, not -long ago, that we were about to undertake the deposing of Mr. Madison ; and who can blame them, if they believe that this deposition has taken place ? My friend the sergeant, on whom I bestowed my bene> diction, will, however, I am afraid, find, that this work of de' posing Mr. Madison will give more trouble than he appeared to expect ; my reasons for which I shall state in my next. i F 'J I. . ■■ n AMERICAN WAB. the the ding rhich any nwas led to ga at voice tosed, t this alof The following account of a battle, and of a victory on oar part, gained over the Americans, is, perhaps, the most curious of any that ever was published, even in this enlightened Lancaster-school country. Before I insert It, let me observe, that the scene of action lies in the heart of Canada, though, from the accounts that we have bad, any one, not armed against the system of de> . ception that prevails here, must have supposed that there was not a single American remaining in Canada. The victory in question is said to have been gained hear the famous falls of Niagara ; and we shall now see what sort of a victory it was, according to the ?f :ffl Leakr§ we never begin as the historians of all other countries do, bj statinf^ the strength of the armies on both sides. We are left here toguese at the force in the field. We are not told what was even our own ■trength on the occasion. If we had been furnished with this in* formation, we should have been able to judge pretty correctly of the nature of the combat, and of the merits of the two amies* When we find tliat (here has been a total loss of 878 men, include ing a vast proportion of qfficera, we must conclude ihai the « drubbing has been on the Americans only ; for the army under General Drumopond did not, in all probability, amount to more than three or four thousand men. There appears to have been only four battalions of regulars engaged^ which would hardly surpass 2000 men. What the militia might have amounted to I cannot tell; but as far as I am able to judge from the account, I should suppose that we have lost, on this occasion, one man out of every Jive ; so that this is a sort of victory that is very costly at any rate. But, except in victories of this kind, who ever heard before of siich numbers of missing and prisoners on the part of the victors ? When armies are defeated, they have generally pretty long lists of missing and prisoners ; bnt when they gain a victory, and, of course, remain masters of the spot on which the battle has taken place, how odd it is to hear that they have so ma- ny people taken and lost^ the latter of whom they can give no account of ! And, especially, how odd it is tliat so many of these taken and lost persons should be officers^ and officers of very high rank too! Never, surely, was there before a victory attended with circumetances so much resembling the usual circumstances of a drfeat. The commander severely wounded; the second in com- mand severely wounded, and made prisoner into the bargain; the aidde-camp to the commander mii.de prisoner; several colonels and lieutenant colonels wounded ; a great number of officers and men missing and oiade prisoners. If such be the marks of a victory gained over the Americans, I wonder what will be the marks of a defeat^ if, unhappily, we should chance \o experience a defeat? At any rate, taking the matter in the most favourable light, what a bloody battle this must have been ! To be sure that is a consideration of Utile weight with the enemies of freedom, who would gladly see half £ogland put to death, if they could thereby LMtnif Wmam Cohhett, £ff. ma- hAV0 theie desira of extermioatkig freedom in Anerica f^raHfied. But thin is not all. The battle baa not merely been bloody, but it has atTorUed a proof of the ddntnined courage of the American army, and leads us to believe that, if we peraevere, the con- (CHt will be long as well as bloody ; and it is the length of the contest that we have to fear. The malignant wine man, who writes ia tbe Tiiuea newspaper, expresses great sorrow that the " heroes of Toulouse'* were not arrived in Ganac'u previous to the late victory* But what could they have done more than to render the *' «Hcce«« of our arm- omflet'..^*^ And this, we are told, was the case without their ab . tance. The same writer, in the same paper, complains of the sovereign of Holland for 'enduig an ambassador to Mr. Madison; and ob- ■erves, that, if be bad waited a Jew manthe, he might have 'been spared the humiliation of sending an embassy to Madison, and Iris let. Hence, it would appear, that this wise man gives our fleets and armies but " a few months'* to conquer America. It was ihus that the same sort of men talked in the memorable times of Bur^ goyne and Cornwallis. But in those times America had not a population of two millions; she had no government ; the greater part of her seaports were in our hands ; we had a fourth part of the people for us ; and the rest were without money, and almost without clothing and arm.i. I shhll not deny that we may, by the expenditure of iwo or tUyee hundred millions of money^ do the Americans a great deal of mischief. I dare say that we shall bum some of their towns, and drive some thousands of women and children back from the coast. But in the meanwhile America will be building and sending out ships ; she will be gaining expe- rience in the art and practice of war ; she will be pushing on her domestic trade and manufactures ; she will be harassing our commerce to death ; and our taxes will be increasing"^ and annual loans must still be made. It is provoking^ to be sure ; but it really is so; that we must leave the Americans in the enjoyment ot their real liberty ; in the enjoyment of freedom which is no shum ; must be content to see their country the asylum of all those in Europe who will not brook oppression ; we must be content to see America an example to every people, who are impatient under despotism, or or, (dreadful alternative !) we must be content to pay all our present taxesy and to have new ones added to them f Nay, after having, for several years, made these new sacrifices in the cause of " regular government, social order, ai>d our holy religion,*^ it may possibly happen, at last, that America will re- main unhurt ; that, having been compelled to learn the art of war, she may become more formidable than ever ; and that, in the end, her fleets, in the space of ten years, may dispute with ours that trident which we now claim as our exclusive property* Already do we hear persons, who are so eager for giving the ** Yankees a 29 i' ''1,!^ :• 1*1; fs*^ 226 Letters of William Cobbett, Esq. hearty drubbing" ask why this is rot done ? Thej are already impatient for the conciuaion, before the beginning has well taken place. They ask why the heroes of Toulouse were not at the late victory ? How unreasonable this is ! Just as if the govern- ment could convey them in a balloon ! Besides, were those he- roes to have no time for repose.^ Were they to be set on the moment they had been taken off? The government, to do it jus- tice, have lost no time. They have sent out men as fast as they could get them ready. But it requires time to transport men, and guns, and horses, and oats, and hay^ and straw, to America ; to say nothing about bread, and beef, and pork, and butter, and pease, and rice. Nay, we see that they had to send out the timbers for ships to Canada, where, one would have supposed, there was wood enough at wny rate. If we were to get possession of New- York I should not be at all surprised to hear that the ministers were sending fprt: thither for the cooking of the men's victuals. This is very diC^erent from what was seen in Portugal, Spain, and France. We shall find no partiiians in America ; and, especially shall we find nobody to take up arms in our cause. All must go from this country* It is a war of enormous expense ;^ and we must expect to pay that expense. If it comes to a close in seven years I shall think that we have very good luck. The troops who are going out now, and who* have been held in readiness to go out for so long a time, will iiardi y be ablie to pull a trigger before next June. By that time the Americans will have half a million of men, and frge men, too, in arms ; and who is to subdue half a million of men, armed for the defeir-^ of their fr'^dom, and their liomes ? How did the people oi )^>a*; e, us long as the sound of freedom cheered their hearts, drive ba^i;, hunt, and lash their in' vaders. And have the Americans less courage, or less activity, than the French ? How silly is it, then, to expect to conquer America in " a few months!" It is a little strange that the go- vernment have published no extraordinary gazette, giving an account of the great " victori/t* of which we have been speaking. They are not, in e;eneral, backward in doing justice to our winners of victories. But it is useless to say much about it. Time will unfold the truth ; and,i, according to all appearance, we shall have time enough to learn all about the events, as well as the effects, of the war against (he republicans of America. It is strange that we have no account of the exact numbers of the prisoners that we ourselves have made. If any officers had been taken by us, would they not have been named.'' And if we have taken no officers, while (he Americans have taken so many of ours, what ipuuner of victory is this ? # ■:frV 'TfSr'*-.-^- •i)a4» '3A^*n*J.v -»w=tei WAYS AND MEANS. Letters of William Cobbetl, Esq. 227 '-■: _ ■ > '^i^ Ii7 my last, I noticed the circumstance of ministers having been BO hard pressed for money to carry on the war with America, that they bad actually found it necessary to apply to the East-India Company for an advance of dtUies on goods not yet imported ; or, if brought to this country, not Uable to payment of duty for several months to come : and for the sum thus obtained, amounting, as I am informed, to one million two hundred thousand pounds, a dis- count was allowed, though I have not heard to what extent. But this is not the only circumstance which shows that ministers can* pot go on without money, and that they have adopted the resolu- tion of raising it, at least for the present, by other methods than that of loans. %i9 Beside the demand upon the East-India Company, which, for obvious reasons, they very quietly submitted to, a requisition has been made upon the other merchants in London, and, I dare say, elsewhere, to pay their arrears of duties on bonded goods, which had not for some time been levied, in consequence of the general stagnation of commerce. These gentry, however, do not seem so well disposed as the East-India Company are, to comply with the demands of government, and have called a public meeting, for the purpose of taking " into consideration the very alarming situation in which thoy are likely to be placed by the recent determination of the lords of the treasury ;" and the Morning Chronicle, which is al'Cf ays sympathetic when any thing occurs to induS^ its sple- netic humuur against ministers, has shown its fellow-fveling for these merchants^ on this very trying, very alarming occasion, by the following sorrowful lamentation : " The scarcity of money, which has forced the chancellor of the exchequer to the harsh mea- sure of forcing payment of the duties on all goods that have been bonded above a twelvemonth, will occasion distress and inconve- nience in the city, much more grievous than would have been felt by a new loan. The measure of bonding was adopted for the pur- pose of making this country a depot for the products of diiferent climes — ^that they might be supplied as the demand arose for them ; and it was an admirable contrivance to secure to the coun- try the carrying trade, as well as to ease the merchant when the markets of the continent were shut up against us. These goods have accumulated in the warehouses for five years, and the amount of duties upon them is said to he four millions sterling. Now, to force these goods out upon the market all at once, without regard to the demand or price, is a measure of such severity as was never attempted before. Many of the original owners are gone. They :\A i! wipnT 22d LtiUra of William Cohbdt, Esq* m II it- disposed of their property, and it may have passed through save* ral hands. In many cases sums have been lent upon the security of those bonded goods ; and if they are to be brought forth, and exposed to sale, they must fail to a price ruinous to all parties* We suppose that a ver)r strong representation of all the facts will be made to the treasury against the measure, as they are ordered to clear fhem out, and pay the duties on or before Sunday the 30th inst. We suppose that the chancellor of the exchequer consider- ed that * the better day, the better deed.' If he should not suc" ceed in procuring this seasonable supply, will this be an apology for requiring a loan, or the funding of exchequer bills after all ?" Those who have been accustomed to consider the writer of thif journal the enemy of corruption, will be able to appreciate, by the above article, his pretensions to that character. When the un* expected event of the overthrow of Napoleon electrified, as it were, the good people of tliis country, and almoi^it rendered them frantic with joy, did not the Morning Chronicky on that occasion, vt0 with the prostituted hireling journals in abusing the fallen emperor ; in stigmatizing him a tyranty a despot, and a usurper ; and in givw ing ministers credit, nay, loading them with praise, for the noble efforts they had made to rid the earth of such a monster? Wai not this a direct approval of every warlike measure of ministers ? Was it not a tacit acknowledgment, that every sixpence of money they had levied had been properly dune, and met with their en- tire approbation f But, what is more : Has not this organ of a faction, while canting and whining about the miseries and cnlami- ties of war, given its hearty concurrent e to the prosecution of the war with America, and applauded every step taken by govern- ment to recolonize the United States ? Even the most servile of all the crew of corruptionista has not been able to excel this con- temptible writer in the manner he has exulted over the reverses of the Americans. Either the editor of the Morning Chronicle is sincere in wishing the Yankees a grubbing, or he is not sincere. If the latter, then does he labour in vain to be consistent, by pro- fessions of regard for peace and abhorrence of war, while he acqui« esces in, and applauds, the hostile measures pursued against Ame- rica. But if this new war is not altogether displeasing to the or- gan of the whigs; if he and his party have resolved to allow mi- nisters to prosecute it their own way, without any molestation from them, how comes it that they are endeavouring, as is evident from the above article, to paralyse the hands ot ministers ? If the war with France required money to carry it on ; if we could not put down Napoleon without increasing the national debt from two hundred and fifty nine millions to nine hdndhkd and hbventt ; if the deliverance of ^urope could nol be effected until the conn- try was burtheoed with an incalculable load of taxes; by what Letters qf William CobbeH, Efq, 229 means is it that we are to reconquer America, and to compel up* wards ot eight millions of people, who have shown no liking fur our government, to submit to its sway, and to relinquish all the blesi- ings of independence ? Is there any other way of doing it but with money .^ To say nothing of their pay, can the men we are every day sending across the Atlantic, to humble the Yankees, be coo* Yeyed thither without money ? They must have food as well as clothing. The scpmen must also have food who navigate the ves- ■els, and this not for the voyage merely, but for the whole time it 18 calculated we are to take in conquering the Americans. Thea there is the immense quantity of naval and military stores, necea* lary for such an army, to be provided for. Can this be done with* out money, or even with a little money ? No, surely ; the war with America, like every other war, can only be supported with money ; and where are ministers to look for it but into the pocketf of (hose men who called for the war, and who promised them their warmest support, if they would only give Jonathan a drubbing i who assured ministers that they would consider no sacrifice too great to obtain this desirable object ? What right, then, have these men to come forward, now that the American war has begun in real earneet, and complain of the hardships of making them fulfil their engagements ? Or where is the consistency, the respect for principle, so much talked of by the Morning Chronicle, when it tells us that it would be harsht distressing, inconvenient, grievous, severe, ruinous^ and the Lord knows what, to force these men to keep their promises ? Is it be- cause they are alarmed, because they begin to feel the conse- quences of their/o2/^, that they deserve compassion ? For my part, it gives me real satisfaction to find these bawlers for war be- ginning at last to feel uneasy for their situation. I wish sincerely they had begun to be alarmed somewhat sooner. It would have been for the interest of all Europe ; I may say, it would have been for the interest of the whole human race, if these alarmists had, twenty years ago, instead of raising a clamour against liberty ; if they had then felt some of those compunctions they now feel, about the cost of the war into which they plunged us. As it is, however, no real friend of his country will regret their present alarms. Long, too long, has the majority, the most deserving class of the community, suffered inconvenience and distress. Harsh, grievous, severe, and ruinous, to thousands, have been the measures pursued under the tedious and lengthened reigns of cor- ruption. It is high time, therefore, that the authors of these ca- lamities should themselves have a little experience of the benefits resulting from the perni ,ious system to which they have so long given countenance and support. My only fear is, that they do not feel enough ; that they are not sufficiently alarmed about theii- vituatiop j and that, notwithstanding all their sympathetic brother w .1 ■ A'- •v- !:|! 3 • S30 Letters of William Cobbett^ Esq. of the Morning Chronicle has so dolefully said in their behalf, they will jet be induced to part with their money, and to go on believing all that our lying presses tell them about our successes over the Yankees, and the great commercial advantages which these must shortly produce. The chancellor of the exchequer, ku the meanwhile, cannot but feel himself placed in a very awk> ward situation, by the restive spirit displayed by John Bull oft this occasion ; and perhaps is now regretting that he so easily de* Earted from the usual, and more palatable way of raising money y annuity. He was driven to this, I have no doubt, on account of the recent uncommonya// in the stocks, occasioned by the anti- cipation in the money market of a new loan. It was very natural, in these circumstances, to turn his attention elsewhere ; and where could he turn it, with greater propriety, than to a quarter where the war had always been most popular, and to a fund which, in truth, belonired to the country ? The money had in advance of the East-India Company, can scarcely be considered ia that light ; but, in the case now before us, it is admitted^ that there is in the hands of the London merchants no less a sum than /our millions sterling belonging (o the public, that has been accumulating (or Jive years, during which, that same public have been submitting to great privations, in order to make up the deficiencies this occasion- cd. Had the Morning Chronicle been properly alive to the in- terests of the country, it would have called for the immediate ap* plication of this money to the necessities of the state, instead of advocating the cause of a set of men who have enriched themselves by the war, and who, even had they been losers by it, have no right to complain ; because, had it not been for the support they have ail along given to the war, the nation would never have been in its present calamitous state. These loyalty men, too; these church and state men ; these haters o( jacobins and levellers ; what new proof is this (hey are giving of their /jafno/tsm .'* Do they wish the country for whom, only a few years ago, they offered to sacrifice their lives and fortunes ; do they wish us now to believe that there was no sinceiity in these professions ? Were they loyal only so long as they were relieved from the burdens of the war? I3o they regard it as no longer deserving their support than it ena« bles them, by a vast accumulation of foreign products, to keep up the price of these articles, and thus render war advantageous only to themselves? But let me not be accused of ascribing improper motives to these gentlemen. It may be that the Morning Chronicle has misconceived the object of the intended meeting, and thus in- cautiously rendered its own principles suspected, and exposed its dearest friends to the danger of being ranked amongst the disaffect- ed, the jacobins, and the levellers, who neither delight in war, nor fnigh for a participation of the public plunder. I shall not, how- ever, lose sight of the sjtbject; for those who have been the most active in promoting war, and who have derived the greatest benefit Ij war.: ; ena- Ltlters of William Cobbett, Esq* 2m from if, are among (he laat who ought to be allowed to escape with- out paying their share of the expense necessary to carry it on. The Couriery in noticing that part of the statement of the Morning Chronicle which respects the supposed hardship of levy- ing the arrears of duties on bonded goods, says : " The goods have been bonded three, four, or five years ; at last, government de- mands the duty upon them. Is it not the same as if government had given a man permission to defer the payment of his income tax for three years, and then required it to be paid ? It must be paid at last.*' From this it appears that it is seriously intended to put the loyalty of bur London merchants to the test. I hope nothing will occur to induce ministers to abandon this intention. As to what the Chronicle says about a loan, or funding exchequer bills, the Courier replies, that nothing of the kind is in contempla- tion ; the truth being, " that the ways and means already provided are sufficient to meet the expenditure to be incurred until some time after Christmas, probably the spring; and the parliament, at its next meeting, will only be called upon to extend the appropri- ation of them.'' It might be supposed from this light way of treating the subject, that the money raised and expended since the abdication of Napoleon, had been of a very trifiing nature. But the fact is, independent uf all the taxes levied previous to that event being still in existence, no less than fifty-one millions sterling was borrowed subsequent to the year 1812 ; and if to this is add- ed the advanced duties paid by the East-India Company, and what is about to be raised of arrears on bonded goods, our national expenditure, in the short period of two years, will be found to be equal, if not greater, than what it was during the most expensive period of the war with France. The sum borrowed since 1 81.2 is, in truth, only two millions short of the whole national debt at the death of George I. and more than a third of its amount at the end of the seven years' war, 1 762. These facts will appear obvious from the annexed table, and, I think, must render it sufficiently oJear, that means have not been wanling hitherto, whatever may be at present, to give energy to the established system. King VVilliam, oS glorious memory, was theya//ier of our na* tional debt. At his death, in 1703, it extended to 1714, death of queen Anne 1725, ' ■ George I. 1763, end of seven years' war 1782, " American war Millions, 46 i» 53 141 S68 259 540 £973,283,159 1792, beginning; of French wac 1802, middle of ditto 1813, month of July - - - Of this last sum there has been redeemed by the sinking fund 224,661 ,932 Leaving of unredeemed capital - • £748,621,227 But as there is interest payable on the money borrotoed to form the sinking fund, the redeemed capital cannot be deducted, with propriety, from the amount of the 1 --i •vr, 232 LaUt9 of William Cobbett, Esq, debt, until the aunuiunti of the ainking fund are paid the principal and interest pf the turns they advanced. ^ X I observe, aince the above remarks were sent to press, that the meeting of the London merchants has) taken place. The chair was tilled by that disinieresied and staunch loyalist. Sir Charles Price, (vho, poor man, has more occasion to regret the termination of the war than all the government contractors put together. Whether the knight and his brethren had taken the alarm that their loj'alty was in danger of being suspected^ if they went the length (fie Morning Chronicle had done; or whether Sir Charles had agreed to take the chair as a matter of policy, to keep down tu'ibulent spirits, who might, on this occasion, be disposed to be clamorous, it is certain the meeting was conducted in a more peaceable and orderly manner than there wa^ reason, on^he first blush of the business, to expect. The Courier report of the proceeding-i makes the loyal baronet say, " He did not think it *.*i,«j.or-y; sr for him to make many observations, as he conceived V,^ . / gentleman present must fkel how ruinou>^ it would be ^ *; c >Je of London, and what a cruel hardship it would be to many individuals, to have those duties strictly levied on so e?' ' " day as the 30th. The committee had come tp certain resciuti*. wl ' • vould be submitted to tht:m, but he should be happy to hear i^ny y ileman who wished still further to elucidate the subject.^ He hoped, however, that, in whatever observations might be made, the subject would be considered coolly^ and that no extraordinary warmth might be introduced into the discussion. They had only one object— the benefit of the trade ; and alttiough they might difi*er from the lords of the treasury on this point, ye\, so far from making any severe observations upon his majesty's government, he believed that it was the wish of every one present to support it. It was, thank God, the best government exist- ing in the world. The resolutions agreed to by the committee were tht,n proposed, and unanimously adopted. A committee was then appointed to wait upon the lords of the treasury, and point out to them the ruinous consequences, both to trade and to the individual merchants, from acting upon the notification that had been given." I am glad it is thus established, beyond dis- pute, that the merchants of London really fed the ruinoiis effects of the measures which they have so long and so stren^iously sup- ported. The extraordinary warmth, the severe observations, of which the chairman was afraid, clearly indicates, that the minds of the trading interest begin to be seriously alarmed. Had these alarms been occasioned by any other cause than individual in- terest; had they arisen from a proper conviction of the impolicy of public measures; had the ruined state ot the country, the rapid and enormous increase of our national debt, the pernicious effects Lellers of Wtlliam, CobhetU Esq* 233 rapid eflects of our paper Currency, and the insupportable burden of taxes. Had causes and considerations like these given birth to these fears and apprehensions, my satisfaction would be greater still. But no— -it is selft mere self, ^^^^ occasions these alarms. Not an atom of patriotism influences them; these terrors result only from the dread of being compelled to disgorge a part of the money which the bonding monopoly has enabled them to amass at the expense of public industry. They would willingly apply a reme- dy to the disease, but then it must cost them nothing. They have been bawling^ for more than twenty years, about the best government in the world. This only required a stock of impu- dence and good lungs. Give them reason to hope that another twenty years of clamour will be as productive as the last, and they will immediately forget the ruinouSf the cruel hardship^ of compelling them to do justice to the country, and bawl as loud aa ever. But, as already said, I am glad these corruptionists, who have so long luxuriated on public plunder, begin to feel alarmed at their situation ; first, because it is high time they should expe- rience some of those pangs that have sent thousands to their graves, and to the workhouse. Next, because, although it is not upon public grounds they now complain, something may arise out of these complaints that may open the eyes of the cre^ dulous and deluded multitude, and ultimately lead to a favourable, change. I see it stated, in all the newspapers, that the emperora of Russia otnd Austria, and the king of rrussia, have issued ordera to recall the excess oi paper curren( y, which the great exigencies of the war had occasioned, and, in other respects, are giving their subjects such relief as must convince them that the cry of peace . is not a deception, and that the benents resulting from a cessation of arms are not chimerical. But in this happy country, under the best government now existing in the world, instead of the circu- lation of paper money being lessened, instead of the public debt being reduced, instead of the war taxes being removed, they are every day increasing to a fearful amount. Everywhere, amongst all classes of society, to whatever side one turns himself, nothing is to be heard but curses on the peace. Even when walking along the public streets, it is no way uncommon to be attracted by the muriyiurs of the labourer and the mechanic, who deeply deplore an event, which, they calculated, would be to them the dawn of happiness, but which has not been accompanied with one single blessing. The plain and obvious reason of j^iis disappointment is, people are still in a state of stupid intoxication, of which corrup- tion has dexterously availed itself to plunge the country into a new war. They may complain of sufferings as much aa they please ; they may talk till doomsday about the hardships they endure ; but as long as they do not shake oS* their present lethargy ; as long 30 •^, ' ti'"! ^) i:' 2S4' Ldiers of fFilliam Cobbett, Esq. M thejr continue the tvillit^ dupes, and hug the chains of tberr oppressors, just so long are they undeserving of Gompassion> or of a tertniaatiou of their miseries. AMERICAN WAR. WHE!!r the French war was closed in a manner so satisfiictory to those who had been its most strenuous advocates, thej, never* theless, perceived the want of war with somebody or other, M being absolutely necessary to the support of that system on which they lived, and which a long war bad introduced, and, in some sort, established. It was curious to observe the effect which the peace had upon this description of persons. They moumtd in their hearts at the success of the projects of the government. They had been, for years, reviling Napoleon ; they had been cursing all those who did not join them m these revilings ; and yet they lamtrited his fall. In short, they, as I once observed, found themselves in that sort of state which our reverend divines would find themselves in if my worthy friend, Mr. Fordham, were to succeed in his strenuous, but I trust, fruitless, endeavours to persuade the good people of England that there is no such being as the devil. There were, at the close of the French war, thou> sands upon thousands who dreaded the effects of peace ; who, in fact, were likely to be almost starved, literaUy starved, by that event. To these persons, a very numerous, and very busy, and noisy and impudent class, any thing that would keep up the ex- penses of war, was bailed with joy ; and as the American war was the only source of hope, in this respect, the outcry was at once transferred from Napoleon to Mr. Madison, who now became the devil ; the man of sin, against whom it was necessary for this chosen and piom nation to wage war. Unluckily for the cause of peace, the corn in England had become cheap during the last half year of the war ; and all that numerous and powerful class who derive their incomes from the land, whether as laadlords,- te- nants, or tythe owners, began to cry out against the effects of peace. With them the American war was better than no war at all. They did not consider what burthen of taxes this war would cause. This was quite out of the question. The whole nation, with the exception of the few remaining ja^sobmst went ** ding dong** to work, ** to give the Yankees a good hearht drubbir^" Things are, however, now somewhat changed. The kings are gone ; the wiseacres have had their feastinga and rdoicings ; the drunk is over, and nothing but the noisome fumes left. The peo- ple, who appeared to exult at the peace, now seem to wonder why they did so. The nation, after the departure of the kings and Laters of William Cobbdlf flsf. 2a& M (beir generals, and after the gloriom aighia in the parka at Loor don, aeema to resemble a battered old hag, who, in the morning after a rout, sits gaping and yawning, sick of the world and of h^^rself. Every thing is dull; and all appears to be changed for the worae; the farmer cannot sell his corn at a prices proportioned to his outgoings ; the French send us ail sorts of produce, dowa even to garden stuffs, at half the price at which we can traise them. The farmer cries out at this ; the shopkeeper and tradesman re- vile the farmer and landholder ; they rejoice to see them brought down, and at the same time complain that their business falls off"; forgetting that this is the natural consequence of the briagiag down of the farmer and land owner. Those who have fixed iB- cenes, and those who carry on no business of profit, those, ia short, who are not compelled to remain in the country in order to get their livwg ; a very great portion of these have quitted the king* don, and have gone to avoid taxes, and to purchase bread and meat upon the continent. This has proved a dreadful stroke to all that part of trade which depended upon luxury ; and what is worse, the evil is daily and hourly increasing — for, one tells another, one who has lived in France a month for what would have been re- quired to suj^rt him here a weeky tells the news to his relations end friends. A quartern loaf for threepence, a poirad of beef for three halfpence, a fowl for fourpence, a turkey for two shillings, a bottle of wine for uxpence i What news for an finglishman, who 4ias a family, who lives upon what is called kiammua, and who, widi a thousaid a year, is really in a situation to envy a coachman Axc a footman ! No income tax to pay ; no exciseman to enter your house when he pleases ; no ty the of the produce of your meadow and garden, and pig-stye, and hen-house. What news for an Eng- lishman ! who, vrith the outside of a gentleman, lives in constant dread of a tax-gatherer i No poor rates to pay. Nobody who has authority to make you give part of your property to support those who, perhaps, are really less in want than you. What news for the poor Englishman, who is eternally called upon for money by the overseer and churchwarden ! In short, what an escape from ex- penses and cares i No man can tell on what day, or at what nour, be will be called upon by the government agents for a sum of money ; and it is only in certain cases that any man can guesc at the amount of the next sum that he will be compelled to p%y. What a relief to be at once out of the reach of all such demands ! This, together with the cheapness of living in F ance, cause ptio- pie to emigrate to that and the neighbouring countries ; while all foreigners, of course, have quitted England for their native coun- tries. Those which cannot emigrate have all the taxes to pay, while great part of their sources of payment are gone. Thus, that peace that overthrew Napoleon, which was to bring us a compen- sation for all our lacrifices, has already made our situatioQ worse^ ' o.'1 286 Lftlera of William Cohhettt Etq. teeing that, io this American war, we have a ground for continU' ing all the taxes, while the peace with France has taken frona - us «U the meana of paying tbem. Amongst those who wished for the overthrow of Napoleon, were those who had to pay ten per cent, out of their fixed incomes to support the war against him. Ob ! laid (hey, let him be beaten, let that cause of the war be put down, and th^n the tax on us will cease. He is put down. He has been put down many months. The tax has not ceased, and, if it cease, some other tax of equal weight must be imposed in its room, or if this be not done, the American war must cease ; and that, too, without " giving the Yankees a hearty drubbing ;" for, up to this time, they have rather been drubbing us, which is a most lamenta- ble fact to go down to posterity. To be sure we have, if report be true, given it them upon the Serpentine River, where the Bri- tish naval flag was everywhere seen flying over the American flag reversed. But, say the Yankee readers, what does this Ser* pentine River mean? What is the story of this achievement, -so glorious to old England, and her wooden walls ? I will tell them. The regent, in the name and on behalf of our ** good old king, God bless him," as they say in the toasts at the city feast ; the regent, in order at once to amuse and instruct the people of the metropolis, caused, at the epoch of the peace, fleets in miniature to be set on float on a piece of water, in a park near London, call- ed Hyde Park. The piece of water spreads, perhaps, over a «pace equal to about eight or ten acres. Here the English fleet performed wonders against the Americans, whose frigates they sometimes sunk, sometimes burnt, sometimes destroyed, and some- times captured. There were some hottish fights ; but our tara always, in the end, overcame the Yankee dogs, and, at the close of the day, the Yankee flag was seen flying reversed, under the English, in token of the defeat and disgrace of the former. But this was not the only instance in which the Yankees were beaten and disgraced. In Portsmouth harbour, a few days before the continental kings visited that port, I saw the Yankee flag flying re- Tersed under the English on board of several ships. The regent, I understood, came to Portsmouth that very night. How pleasing it must have been to his Royal Flighness to behold such a sight! The spectators were io raptures at it. They shouted amain ; «nd, for the moment, seemed to forget even the taxes. Well, then, who has any ground of complaint ? The govern* ment cannot obtain for us the reality of what was here exhibited in visioni without collecting from us the taxes necessary to support and carry on the war ; and until we petition against tht American "var, we can have no reason whatever to complain of the taxes. The question of justice or of injustice seems to have been ' wholly laid aside for some time past. The giving of the hearty drubbing to the iasoleut Yaakees has supplied the place of all Bi Leltera of William Cobbett, Esq. 837 :i ■uch topics. But I do not know how it haa happened, there are people who now begin to ask, toliy we are still at war ? I will, therefore, onne more state the grounds of the present war with 'America, in as clear a manner as I can» consistent with brevity. ' In 1810, and on to 1812, there existed two subjects of complaint on the part of the Americans against us. They complained that, I'by virtue of certain Orders in Council, issued by us, we %'iolated , their neutral rights ; and, also, that we were guilty of a gross attack •^upon their independence, by stopping their merchant vessels at stay and taking out of them persons, under pretence of their being » 'British subjects. The Orders of Council were repealed in IUI'2, and, therefore, that ground of complaint then ceased. But the other ground of complaint still existed. We continued to take persona out of their ships ; and, upon that ground, after divers remonstrances, they declared war against us. I ought here to stop to observe that a great error was adopted by the nation at 4he time when the Orders of Council were repealed. It was «aid in parliament, and believed by the nation, that, if the Orders in Council were repealed, all would be well, and that a settlement 4Df all ditferences with America would immediately follow. This assertion I contradicted at the time, knowing that it would prove to be false ; because the congress had repeatedly declared that they never would yield the point of impressment, that being the term which they gave to the forcible seizure of persons on board their ships on the high seas. The minister (Perceval) opposed the repeal of the Orders in Council as long as he could, alleging, ■as one objection to it, that it would not satisfy the Americans and :. prevent war. The advocates of the repeal insisted that it would satisfy the Americans ; and, as a proof of the sincerity of this their opinion, they pledged themselves, that in case the repeal did not satisfy America, they would siipport the war against her with nil their might. This pledge obtained, the minister had no oppo- sition to fear within doors or without; for the opposition were pledged to support the war, and their prints became, of course, pledged along with them. The people were led to believe, that It was only the Council Orders that had formed the ground of complaint with America ; and when they still found that she per- severed in the war after the repeal of those orders, they set up a charge of treachery and breach of faith against her. This error, which originated in the desire of the opposition to beat the minis- ter, has produced much mischief. It obtained favour to the war at first ; and things taking a lucky turn upon the continent, all idea of a dread of America vanished, and nothing was thought of but punishing her for her insolence. But still her great subject of complaint existed. She went to war on that ground ; and, there- fore, let us now see what that ground really was. It is well known . that, whether ia language, luauners, or person, it ia very difficult, S til i!3» Lellen of Wiliiam Cobbett, £s|. if not quite impossible, in most cases, to distinguish an Americitt from a native of England. We alleged that the American mer- chant captains sailed with English saibrs on board their shipi, some of them deserters from the English navj, and that as th« American ships were very numerous, and frequently sailed fron ports where English men-of-war lay, such harbouring of our seap men became dangerous to the Tery existence of our naval force, and, of course, put our national safety in jeopardy. Upon these grounds we adopted a remedy, which was to au» thorize the commanders of our ships of war to stop American Teasels at «ea, and to impress out of tb'im all persons appearing to tkem to be British subjects. The Americans alleged that, us virtue of this authority, our officers impressed out of their shipa tnany thousands of native Americans^ forced them on board of our ships of war, compelled them to fight against nations at peac* with America, and in a service and cause which they abhorred, look them into distant climates, exposed them to danger and to death, rumed their prospects in life, and filled America with distressed parents, wives, and children. That this was the case in nwmerout instancesy our government has never denied. Indeed, they couM not ; for a great number of persons, native Americans, so impress- ed, were at different times released by the admiralty, on the demand of the American consul in England. But it must have followed of necessity, that many borne away into battle, or into distant seas, would never find the means of obtaining their release | end, indeed, it is well known that many lost their limbs, and man; their lives, in our service, subjected to the discipline of our navj Those, who are for giving the Yankees a good hearty drubbing, will hardly be disposed to feel much for the fathers and mothen thus bereft of their sons, or for the wives und children thus bereft of tlnir fathers. But, I can assure them, as I assured the Prince Regent, in 1813, that the people of America felt very acuteCy upon the subject ; that the newspapers of that country were filled with their lamentations, and with their cries for vengeance^ The American government remonstrated with ours; it besought our government to desist from this practice, which it asserted to be » violation of the known laws of nations, an outrageous insult to Ame- rica as an inde|)endent state, and an aggression, in short, which the American nation was resolved to resent. Our government asserted that it had a right to the service of its own sailors; that the danger to our very existence was so grea* that the pf^ctiee could not be given up ; that if American citizens were taken by mistake they were sorry for it, and would give them up when demanded by their government; but that the prac- tice was of vital importance ; for that, without it, our navy would be ruined. The last argument has, indeed, always been the main one with those^bo have justified the practice of impreMmeut. The fjeUert of WUlitm CobhtUt Eiq. 289 AmericM governiuent, in aniwer to this, laid, ** We do not mini jfimr seamen ; we would rather that they were never again to aerve on board of American ships ; we want none but our own aeamen, leaving you yours. But if your seamen have so great a partiality for our service and our country, as to quit you, or, as to be disposed to quit you, in numbers so great as to endanger your very existence as a nation ; if this be really so, it is no fault of ours. IfV e cannot help their preferring our ships, and our country, to yours, any more than a pretty girl can help the young men liking her better than they like her ugly companions. Their fault ii their nant of taster perhaps; but, at any rate, the fault cannot ^« owTM, Therefore, you have no reason to complain of us } nor have you any right to interrupt our commercial pursuits, under pretence of recovering those wnom you call your subjects. There am, perhaps, some Americans who have a taste for your service. Keep them» in Ood'a name. We never do, and never will, at* tempt to impress them from on board your ships ; and, indeed, we nave no right no to do, such a practice being without a single precedent in the whole list of lirritings on public law, and in all the long history of maritime nations." This was the substance of the language of the American govern- ment. But they did not stop at asserting that we had no right to do what we did. They said further, ** Never' heless, in order to convince you of our sincere desire not to emp! / your seamen, we will do much more than strict right calls upon us to do. We think it strange that the jack tars of England, tne jolly, sincere, brave, faithful, patriotic, and loyal sons of Neptune, to whom the deity has so long delegated his trident, and who are, as we learn from alt your national sayings and singings, so tirmly attached to their be- loved king and his family ; we think it passing strange, that these admirable and single-hearted persona should be disposed to leave your glorious fleet, and to flock to oar poor Yankee service ; and we cannot but believe that some ill-minded people have calumniated your honest, jelly jack tars, when they have persuaded you to. believe that the impressment of the jolly jacks from on board of our Yankee ships is necessary to the existence of your navy. However, supposing this really to be the case, we are willing, for the sake of peace, to provide an efiectual remedy." They then made these propo«<'>ong : That whenever an American ship was in any port, no matter in what country, any person, authorized by our government, might go to any civil magistrate of the port or town, and demand to have surrendered to him any man out of the American ship, upon the allegation of his being a British sub- ject ; and that if the civil magistrate, npon hearing the parties, should determine in favour of the claimant, the man should at once be surrendered to him, though such magistrate should be one of pur own justices oftht ptttc^y eithejr in England ot in any of our *'f!^-: S4d Laten of William Cobbeit, Esq. coloniei. And, further, io order most effectually to prevent any . British subject from being even received on board an American ship as a sailor, the American government offered to pass an act imposing a very heavy pecuniary penalty (so high, I believe, as a thousand dollars) on every mister of an American ship who should engage a British subject to serve on board his ship ; so that any such person so engaged would have had nothing to do but to give informatipn, and receive, I believe, 700 dollars out of the thousand. With this regulation, and this penal enactment, it appears to me that it would have been impoasible for any number of our countrymen to have served in the American ships. Reader, can you imagine any way by which the American government could have more fully proved its sincere desire not to injure £ngland by affording a place of refuge tc English sailors ? If you caUf state it; rf you cannot, I must leave you to discover why these offers were not accepted : and why this war was not avoided. But sup- posing these offers not to have been satisfactory, why are we not at peace now ? The peace in Europe put &v end to the caui'e of disputed Our sailors could no longer desert to American ships, when they were discharged from our own. The peace in Europe put an end to the quarrel, as naturally as the cessation of a shower puts an end to the quarrel of two persons who are contending for the shelter of a pent*house. We had nothing to do but to make a treaty of peace, and say nothing more about the impressment of seamen* If the Americans were willing to do this, I am at a loss to discover how the continuance of the war is to be justified. I am aware, indeed, that it has been strongly inculcated in the Times, and other newspapers, that we ought noWt now^ noWf notv^ while all goes on so smoothly; now, while the tide is with us, to crush America for ever ; to clip her wings for a century ; to annihilate her means of forming a navy to be our rival on the ocean. Alas! if this be the project, it is not ^mmca that we are at war with ; it is Nature herself, in whose immutable decrtes it is written, that no such project shall succeed. We mustj to effect this famous project, annihilate her woods, her waters, and her lands ; and though our parliament has been called omnipotent, its omnipotence is not of that sort which is requisite for such an undertaking. It can do what it pleases with us in these islands ; but it cannot reach across the Atlantic, except by its fleets and armies ; except by means of the same sort which are opposed to it. Here it is omnipotent, because here is no power to resist it ; but tliere, a power exists in open defiance of it. Therefore, it cannot do there what it pleases. It is impossible to say what exploits our armies and navy may perform in America. 1 shall leave the military and naval opera- tions to timet the great trier of ail things. But certain it is, that y Lttten qf Williafn CobbeH, E9q, S4I; the gentry, who were so hot for the drubbing, begin to h» vety impatient. The war, in their view of the matter, appears to lan- guish. Little or no blood is drawn. We hear of no fine towns demolished ; none of those fatal thing8,,the manufactories of woollens and cottons, have been destroyed ; there are still American public ships of war afloat, and more building ; and, as to the private ships of war, they swarm even upon the coasts of the «* motlter coufUry,"* to the great venation of the Morning Chronicle, who calls them " tn- solent marauders." Oh ! insolent dogs ! come into our own chan- nel, and almost into our own ports ! Come three thousand miles to iqsult their natural mother ! 1 wonder they are not afraid of being destroyed by the *' British thunder.*' But, Mr. Perry, who makes use of inapplicable terms ? A marauder means one that goes to seek plunder unlanifuUy ; and if he be detected, he is, genej^ally, hanged — whereas theseprivateers from America come with cowi- missions onboard. They are fully authorized by the laws of their own country to do what they do ; and even if we chance to capture thecs, we can treat their crews only as prisoners of war. Perhaps Mr. Perry, or his editor, thinks that we ought to be al- lowed to destroy American towns, and to lay waste the country, without any opposition, or any act of retaliation. Is it not " tnso- lenV* in us to threaten to reduce the Americans to ^^unconditional submission.'" Is it not insolent in us to say in our public prints, and under the form of a speech in parliament by one of the lords of the admiralty, that Mr. Madison is to be deposed.'' Yet all thii? is allowable, and even praiseworthy. This, however, is not a way to put an end to the war. The dilemma in which the foes of freedom are placed is one of great difficulty. America is the very hot-bed of freedom. While the people in that country re- tain their liberties ; that is to say, while that country remains unsubdued, despotism, under whatever name she may disguise herself, is never safe ; and if peace takes place with America, not only will she instantly start, with enormous advantages, in the race of manufactures and commerce, but millions of men and money will flock to her from Europe, which her example will soon again shake to the centre. On the other hand, if the war be per- severed in against her, all our taxes must be continued, and loans must annually be made. Which our statesmen will prefer, it would be presumption in me to attempt to predict, and, therefore, I shall, for the present, leave the subject, with just observing, that those who are still for giving the Yankees a drubbing, ought to receive the tax-gatherer with open arms, and greet him with an almost holy kiss. ,,r < may pera- tbat rji Ul Letters of WiUiam Cobbettf Eaq^ mi i AMERICAN WAn. I HATE, from the first, expressed my apprehentiom ar to ihe^ end of this war. I used the utmost of my eadiavours to prevent !t. While shut up in a prison, out of which, at the end of two long yean, 1 went, with the paying of a thousand pounds to tB£ IE mo, for having h»d the indiscretion ta write about the flogging of English loea^ raiitiamen, at the town of Ely, in England, and about the presence of Hanoverian troops upon that occasion ; while so shut up, the greatest object of my efforts was to prevent this ill-fated war, the seeds of which I saw sown-, and the faiaturity of which I saw pushed on by those malignant and foul wretches, the writers of the Times and Courier ne«vspapers. This was the way in which I Employed my days and years of imprisonment: my efforts were all in vain. In vain did I show the falsehood of the state- menta and the doctrines on which the war-whoopers proceeded ; in vain did I appeal to the reason and justice, and even to the interest oi a people dehided into a sort of furor against America. At last the war took place, and the disgrace which we suffered at sea completed the madness of (he nation, who seemed to have no other feeling than that of mortification and revenge. What! should the people be suffered to live ! should they be suffered to exist in the world, who had defeated and captured a British frigate t should those who had caused the British flag to be haiUed down not be exterminated! Disappointment; astonishment; fury! The nation was mad. '* Rule Britannia," the constant call of the boasting rabble, at places of public resort, was no longer called for with such eagerness, and was heard with less rapture. The heroes in blue and buff carried their heads less lofty. Their voices seemed to become more faint, and their port less majestic. They seemed to feel as men of honour would upon such an occasion. In short, we all felt that a new era bad taken place in the naval annals of the world. Still, however, the dread of the power of Napoleon restrained many from a wish to see us embarked in a war for the conquest of America. But he was scarrc'y subdued by the combined efforts of all Europe, when this whole nation called aloud for war, a war of punishmentt against the American states. And it was openly declared, in the most popular of our newspapers, that we ought never to sheath the sword till we bad subjugated the states, or, at least, subverted their form of government. The pernicious exam- ple of the existence of a republic, founded on a revolution, was openly declared to be inconsistent with the safety of our govern- loeDt. It was, besides, distinct^ alleged that now, noWy norVf or Letters qf William f^'obheit, Esq.' $43 / strained uest of efforts , a war openly e ought 8, or, at IS exain- t, wa» govern- now, OP fuevet , was the time to prevent Aooerica from ever having & navy. The necessity of destroying her means of having a navy has since been repeatedly urged. It has bfeen stated, and restated, that our naval power must soon come to an end unless we now destroy this republic, root and branch* The defeat and capture of our fleet, ^(id the defeat of our army, on and near Lake Champlain, (of which Ilhall spea^ more particutariy hereafter,) have not at all softened the language o( the public prints. The Times newspa- per, of the 9th instant, calls it " a lamentable evil to the civi- ifiziiD woi^ld;" by which appellatiou these writers always wean ^^j^QLt 60V£RiiM£irTs. The writer then adds : " Next to tl^ annihilation of the late military i^espotism in Europe, the aubver- sio/i of that system of fraud and malignity, which constitutes the (^ w^ple policy of the Jefiersonian school, was an event to be de- Vou^ly wished by every man in either hemisphere, who regards f^jational liberty, or the honourable intercourse of nations. It was ^ an event to which we should have bent, and ye* ^nusl bend ail our > «pergies. The American government must be displaced, or it niiU, sooner or later ^ plant its poisoned dagger in the heart of the parent state.** Sooner or later you see ! The gentleman looks inio futurity. He does not even hint at any terms of peace. He plainly says, that we must displace the government of America; that is to say, change its form and nature ; subjugate the country, decolonize it, repossess it. Now mind, the opposition prints do i)ot hnd fault with this. They do not deprecate such an object of the war. They surpass even their adversaries in exulting at the burnings and plunderings. They find fault that more mischief lias not been done. Thus, then, we see what the nation regard^ as the object of the war. I say the nation^ because the Morning Chronicle, which is the organ of the opposition, is just as bitter against America, as are the Times aiid the Courier. The truth is, that the only oppositiony as to the war, will arise out of our failures. The opposition will only blame the ministers for not having burnt more ships, plundered more towns, and done more mischief- Tliere is, indeed, a sort of dread of the length of the war. People are a little disappointed that Mr. Madison is not yet deposed ; that the states have not yet separated ; that our sons of noble families are not yet wanted to go out as governors, and captains general, to Pennsylvania, New- York, Massachusetts, Virginia, &c. &.c, ; that it will require another campaign to brins the deluded Americans to their senses; that (and h^^re is the pincfay Mie income tax will be wanted another year, and that another loan must be made. But " what is one more year of expense at the end of twenty-two years of war? And then it will cive us such lasting peace and secu- rity." Thus is fear hushed ; and when, in addition, the thought of our defeated and captured frigates comes athwart the mind, the Pi U 244 Letiers of William Cobbettf Esq. income tax ia forgotten, and vengeance, war, and blood, is the cry. I nonr proceed to notice more particularly the events which have reached our knowledge since the date of my last article upon the subject. The plundering of Alexandria appears to have been the most successful of our enterprises. The American papers give ouf people great credit for their talent at the emptying of shops, and the embarkation of their contents, at which, to do our army and navy (especially the latter) but hare justice, we seem to have been uncommonly adroit. It seems, however, that the squadron, which had the plunder aboaid, had but a narrow escape in descending the Chesapeake ; but plunder there was, and a good deal of it ; and there can be little doubt that the 8nc< cess and profit of the enterprise will act as great encouragements to future undertakings of a similar description ; the only danger being, that the zeal of our commanders may push them on faster than a due regard to their safety might otherwise dictate. In an attempt against Baltimore we failed. That is to say, we met with a defeat. Not in the field; but that is nothing to the purpose. We marched and sailed against the town, with all our forces, by sea and land, and we were compelled to retreat without doing any thing against that town. The town is safe ; and if the war end as this expedition has ended, all the world will agree that Ame* rica has defeated us. We may be sure of this ; and, therefore, we must carry on the war till we have subdued America ; or, we must make up our minds to the reputation of having been defeated by that republic. A pretty serious alternative ; but it is one which must and will exist, and of this we shall become more and more sensible every day, and particularly if we attend to what foreigners say upon the subject. The expedition of our troops and fleet against Passamaquoddy and the Penobscot, is of a nature so trifling as hardly to be worthy of notice. That territory ia no more important in America than the Isle of Sky is in Great Britain. It is a conquest, and so would the Isle of Sky be by an American privateer. What a figure does this conquest make in the Gazette ! What a grand aflbir it appears to be ! But, did a thousandth part of the people of England ever hear of Passamaquoddy or Penobscot before ? It is Baltimore, Charleston, Wilmington, Norfolk, Philadelphia, New- York, Bos- ton, that they have heard of. They have been led to believe, that the city of Washington is to America what London is to England, or what Paris is to France. Nothing can be more falla- cious. There are, perhaps, two hundred towns in America, each of which is more populous and rich than Washington was, or than it was likely ever to be. Besides, we did not keep possession of Washingt(Mi, as the Germans and Russians did of Paris. We did not remain there to erect a new government. We only set fire to |! I Xjetters of William Cohbett, Esq. 245 we pears ever imore, Bos- lelieve, is to falla- each sr than ton of Ve did fire to a few buildings, and then retreated. If an American privateer was to set fire to a few fishing huts on the coast of Wales, should we look upon it as a very briiiiant affair ? Yet this Washington enterprise was, by the Morning Chronicle, deemed Ihe most gal- lant dash of the war ! In the ** demonstration,*' as Admiral Coch- rane calls it, against Baltimore, General Road was killed; and some of our papers call this foul play ! " The fellom^^ says one of them, ** took aim at the gallant Rosa from behind some brushwood''" Well, and what then ? Do not our troops shoot from behind para* pets, and walls, and works of all sorts ? And do we suppose that the Americans will not make use of a bush when it comes in their way ! If this crying tone be to be indulged in, we shall, I fear, cry our eyes out before the war be over. We hare sent our bombs, and rockets, and rifles, and all sorts of means of destruc* tion ; our writers blame our ministers for not sending the means of knocking down towns fast enough ; and shall we abuse poor Jona* than if he avail himself of a bush, and of his skill at hitting a mark ? General Ross burnt their president's house, and a, Yankee shot General Ross. These are things which naturally occur ; and, however we may lament the death of any officer, we must reflect that an invaded people will shoot at their invaders, unless the for> mer are ready to receive the latter as friends. Before I proceed to notice the late affair on and near Lake Champlain, there are some remarks to be bestowed on certain chor racleri&tic facts which have leaked out, and on certain paragraphs in our newspapers. The Americans are accused of cowardice, for having retreated before inferior numbers, and taken shelter in Baltimore. Why was this cowardice ? The main object was to defend that great and rich city. The second was io annihilate our army and naval force. To make a long ''■tand in the open country, with raw troops, agaiD<)t disciplined soldiers, was not the way to effect either of these purposes. The main object was ef* fected, and our retreat only, probably, prevented the effecting of the latter. The Times newspaper, a few days ago, remarking on the cowardice of the Americans, contrasted with the bravery of our army and navy, observed that the cause was, that they had no feelings o( patriotism ; that they cared nothing about their country. Now, what is the ground of this war ? Why, we complained that the Americans harboured deserters from our navy; and they com- plained that vre forced native Americans into our service. This fact is notorious to all the world. This fact is jrecorded in oiir own official documents. This fact makes a part of unquestionable history. Another fact has just been recorded by this same Times newspaper ; namely, that two of our seamen were hanged, on board the fleet in the Chesapeake, ^br attempting to desert to the enemy. It is also stated, in the same paper, (24lh October,) that about one himdred and fifty of our soldiers deserted on the retreat from tilt' Mm] ?^ m Lell&rs of William Cobbett, Esq. Plattsburgb* Now, let this empty boaster produce us iostaqcea like these on the side of the Americana if he can ; and if he cannot, let him acknowledge himself to be either a deluded fool or a de- luded knave. But has Jonathan shown no seal for his country ? What was that act of self-devotion which induced a man to ex- gose his property to certain, and himself to probable destruction, y shootmg at General Ross, and killing his horse under him, in the city of Washington, after the town was in possession of pur troops ? By what feeling was the man actuated wljo exposed Ibis life for the sake of killing General Ross, and who must have been almost alone, since he was hidden behind some brushwood ? To what are we to impute the capture of two hundred young men of the "best families in Baltimore,'* found in the foreground de- fence of their city ? Was greater courage, more desperate devo* tion to country, ever witnessed than at the battle of Chippewa and at Fort Erie ? How comes it ^hat during the last campaign we have lost more officers and men, out of twenty thousand employed, than we ever lost in the European war out of one hundred thousand ? From what feeling was it that Mr. Madison called, as we are told lie has, Mr. Rufus King to his councils, and from what feeling is it that Mr. Kmg has accepted of the call ? The Morning Chronicle, that chamelion of this war, now boasts that it foretold union against us. It never foretold it. It always urged on the war. It called, and it was the first to call, the burn- ing of Washington a most gallant dash. However, it is now flear that we have completely united the whole country. The bombarding of StoningioUf in Connecticut, and the plundering of Alexandria, in Virginia, have done what all the workings of goud sense and public spirit were not able to etTect. Mr. Rufus King, whom we regarded as the rival and the implacable enemy of Mr. Madison, has taken a post und^" him for the defence of his country; and we shall now see, that amongst those whom we thought our friends, we shall find the most resolute enemies. Stonington and Alexandria will be constantly before every Ame- rican's eyes. I always was opposed to the war, and to this mode of warfare especially. I knew it would produce that which it has Eroduced. I knew it would rend«r the breach too wide ever to e healed again. I knew that it would produce either the total subjugation of America, which I thought impossible^ or our final defeat in the eyes of the world, with the niterior consequence of seeing America a most formidable naval power, which the recent events on the borders of Canada seem but too manifestly to por- tend. . It is quite surprising to what an extent this nation has been, and still is deluded, with regard to America, and to the nature and effect of this war. It is only fifteen days ago that the Courier newspaper contained the following paragraph : Letters of William Cohhett, Esq, Ut 38 like cannot, r a de- antry ? to ex- uctioD* liiro, in of pur xposed 3t have iwood? ing men uod de> e devo- ewa and (re have ed, than ousand ? are told feeling is w boasts [t always the burn- it is now y. The mdering rkings of r. Bufus enemy of ce of his rhom we enemies, iry Ame- his mode ich it has e ever to the total our find :|nence of le recent ly to pot- has been, lature and Courier ' *< There were reports last night of our having attacked and ta- ken New-London, and destroyed the city of Baltimore. Both these events are probable, but there are no arrivals from America later than the last despatches from Admiral Cochrane, dated on the 3d of last month. But as the wind has been fair for some days, we hourly expect a fresh arrival. It must bring news of great importance — intelligence from Canada— 'another attack upon Fort Erie — another conflict with General Brown — perhaps a bat- tle with the American General Izard— .the further operations of Admiral Cochrane and General Ross — the result of the expedition under General Sherbrooke — the operations of the Creek Indians, who have already made their appearance upon the frontiers of South Carolina — and "last, not least, * the effect of our late attack upon the minds oj ihe American people — the steps taken by Mr. Madi- son, if he yet remains president, and the measures adopted by (hose states that were in a ferment against the government, even before the disaster, and were not indisposed to a separation from the other states. No arrival from America was ever expected with more impatience." Well, the arrival has taken place. The impatiently-expected arrival has taken place. New- London has not been attacked. The attack on Baltimore has failed. General Ross is killed^ Admiral Cochrane has arrived at Halifax for the winter, with the plunder of Alexandria. The effect upon the minds of the Ame- rican people has been such as to unite even Mr. King with Mr. Madison, who *'yet remains president." iVo new attack has been made on Fort Erie, but the army of General Izard, at Flattsburgh, has been attacked by our commander in chief, with the ** Wel- lington heroes** under him, with the "conquerors of France*' under him, ' while the American fleet was attacked by ours ; and not only have both attacks failed, but we have experienced a more complete defeat than, as far as I can recollect, we ever be- fore experienced, the notable affair of the Helder only excepted. Thinking Johnny Bull ! You, who were so eager to give the Yankees a drubbing — ^you, who were so full of fight that nothing but another war would appease you — pray, can you tell me how it is that our ministers, who have given Us such exact accounts ftbout the " gallant dashes'* at Wasbington and Alexandria, and who have published such loads of despatches and proclamations about the conquest of the Penobscot territory, not equal in popu- lation to the parish of St. Martin's in the Fields ; can you tell me how it has happened that this ministry has not received, or, at least, has not published, the account of the land and water battles at Plattsburgh and on Lake Champlain, though we have Sir George Prevost's general order, issued after the battle, and though we have numerous extracts from Canada papers, dated many days later than the date of the order ! Cannot you tell me thi%,thinking f- I 248 Lellers of Wjilliam Cobbett, Esq* Johnny Bull ! you who, when you heard of the capture of Wash- ington City, were for sending out a viceroy io the American states ? You, who called the Americans cofoardly dogSy and haiU ed the prospect of a speedy release from the income tax, and the payment of the national debt by the sale of lands, and by taxes raised in America ? Well, then, in maWing patiently for this offi- cial account, we must content ourselves with what the newMpapers tell us they have extracted from the papers of Canada. Lottera extracted from the American papers make our loss dreadful in- deed. General Macomb, the American commander, is repre- sented to have written to his father, at New-York, telling him that he had killed or taken 3,000 of our army, and that he expected to destroy one halfoi it. Our newspapers said that this viha false. They also said that it was false that we had any thing like a fri- gate on Ijake Champlain, though it now appears that we had a ship actually mounting 32 guns, and that the largest of the Ame- rican vessels was rated 28 guns, and carried, as we say, 30 guns. But let us take, for the present^ the account of the Canada papers, and look with impatience, but with becoming humility, to his ma- jesty's ministers for further information. Thus, then, speak the Canadian printers ; thus speak the bitterest enemies of America : Montrealt September 15. "You have herewith a copy of the general order of the i3th instant, to understand which, requires more than being able to read it. There never was, perhaps, such a composition ; for, without knowing the result, one might be led to think we had gained a victory. Report says that our hero, on passing some of the troops on the road, was hissed by them ; and further, and which 1 believe to be true, that when the order was given for re- treating. General Power rode up to the commander in chief, and begged the order for retreating might be recalled, as General Bri9« bane was about storming the fort, and would have possession of i(^ in a few minutes — the reply, it is said, was — " My orders must be obeyed,'' and then a general retreat took place. I do not know with any certainty, having heard no one speak on the subject, but it will not surprise me if we have lost, one way and another, in this disgraceful affair, not less than 800 men. It was a fair battle between the fleets ; the fort did not play on the ConGance and Linnet, as has been stated. Captain Pring, in the Linnet, though aground, is said to have fought his vessel for a considerable time after the Confiance had struck." Quebec, September 16. " Stories become blacker and blacker respecting our oidgrace and misforiunesat Plattsburgh. Lieutenant Drew, of the Linnet, is come in here, being paroled for fourteen days ; he stales the loss of the fleet to have been, in a great measure, owing to the land forces not storming the American fort; there were only 1,400 men Ldters of fTiHiam Cobhettf Esq, 249 io it, under General Macomb, who informed Captain Pring, of the Linnet, that every thing was prepared to surrender on the advance of the British army. Report sajs, that General Robinson is under arrest; that Generals Brisbane and Power had tendered their swords to Sir George Prevost; and (hat Colonel Williams, of the 13th, had declared he would never draw his sword again while under the command of Sir George. It is said Sir George is gone to Kingston.'' Montreal, September 17. *' My last letter to you was of date the 14(h instant, when I had the mortification to inform you of our fleet on Lake Champlaia being entirely defeated and taken by the enemy, at Plattsburgh, about seventy miles from this place, and when we had an army of 14 or 16,000 regular and brave troops, who only wished tio be allowed to storm the enemy's fort, and which every body says would easily have been accomplished, had any other person had the command than Sir George Prevost. We have siifTered more disgrace from the incapacity of this man than we will retrieve for months to come, let our exertions be ever so great. There were six of our officers killed on board of our vessels, and twenty are made prisoners ; and besides, we must have lost near 1,000 brave men io killed, wounded, and prisoners. It will not surprise me if the expedition hascost about 500,000/. Report now says that Sir George Prevost is going up to Kingston to attack Sacketl's Har« hour, but I am sure he will not be a welcome visiter in the Upper Province. The army retreated most precipitately, and are, in general, at the posts they occupied before the expedition took place, with the loss of about 150 deserters on the retreat, beside a vast loss in provisions and munitions of war. The Wellingtonian soldiers say that the hunters and the hounds are capital, but that the huntsman and the whipper-in are two fools — meaning, I con- sider, Sir George Prevost and his Adjutant General, Major £. Baynes." " We have inserted the general order relating to the proceedings of the army and flotilla at Plattsburgh. Candour must compel every one to confess, that the result of the late operations has fallen short of even " moderate expectations." The baitle lasted an hour and a half. The force of each squadron, we are informed, stands thus : British, one ship, mounting, in all, 32 guns ; one brig, in all, 20 guns; two sloops of 70 tons, each 10 guns, and ten gun-boats. American, one ship, rated 28 guns, carrying 30 ; one brig, 24; one strong schooner, 18; three sloops, each 10 guns; and twenty-four gun-boats. The crews, tonnage, and weight of metal, are estimated at one fourth superior on the side of the Americans ; and we have no reason to doubt our informa- tion. We have always considered ofiensive warfare as the best 32 I W }' ri^.if;v ih. 250 Letters of William Cohbettf Esq. mode of securing peace; and recent humiliation basi not changed; our tone. We may be called to defend points which have, hither< iOf not been thought of; and, consequently, the late retreat may not have been ill advised : the fort at Plattsburgh should, how- ever, have been stormed. That part of the labour would have cost less blood and embarrassment than was sustained in the re* treat ; a retreat that will tend to rouse the energies of the enemy. We might have taken 2,000 prisoners, a fine train of artillery> and immense stores. • " We are not military men, but we call on " every experienced officer" to support or contradict us. If we are wrong, we shall take a pride in confessing our ignorance. The scientific, brave generals, officers, and soldiers, of the duke of Wellington's army, and the others, who have before fought in our cause in the Cana- das, did every thing which depended on them to support the noble efforts of their brothers on the water. That distmguished officer, General Robinson, who has been twice wounded this year on the other continent, with part of his gallant brigade, had braved all danger in an assault. Some of the picquets of the fort were torn away, and a^few minutes more would have given up the fortification, with an immense train of artillery, into our hands, and every American must have fallen, or been made prisoner. It was thought necessary to check the ardour of the troops, and we must now instantly redouble our energies to obtain command of the lake, or with humility await our future destiny** Thus, then, according to our own accounts, the Americans had but 1,500 regulars and 6,000 militia, wherewith to make face against 1 5*000 British troops, commanded by four major generals and Sir George Prevost, a general of long experience, and of great reputation. On the lake we say that the Americans had a fourth more than we. Suppose they had ! I do not admit the fact ; but suppose (hey had. A fourth ! how long is it since we thought a fourth too much ? Every one knows, that Sir Robert Calder was disgraced for not pursuing double his force. We are become very nice calculators of force. We shall soon hear, I suppose, that we ought always to keep aloof, unless we can count the guns, and know that we have a superiority. Fifteen thousand men, seven of them from the army of '♦ the conqueror of France !" And these drew off from the presence of 7,500 Yankees, to whom they were about to give a good drubbing ! Why, it will make such a noise in the world ! It will make such a buzz ; it will astound " honest John Bull," who was, only the last market day, charging his glass, and bragging about sending out a viceroy. The whole fleet! What, all! Our little ones and all ! All at one fell swoop ! It will make Johnny Bull scratch his noddle in search of brains. The chuckling of honest John at the burning of Washington, the plundering of Alex* Letters of IVllliam Cobbettf Esq. 251 nndria, and bombardini; of Stonington, will be changed into gruni' hling, I am afraidw But come, Johnny, you must not grumble. You were for the war. It is your own war. The ministers are not to blame. You insisted upon chastising and humbling the Ame- ricans. You would have Mr. Madison deposed. You said he had sided with Napoleon. You said what was false, Johnny ; but that's no matter. You called upon the ministers to depose him. This I will always say, and can at any time prove against you. The consequences of this victory of the Americana must be very important. Sir George Prevost is blamed, and, indeed, abused, while the officers of the fleet, the defeated and captured fleet, are complimented to the skies. When will this folly cease ? When shall we cease to be so basely unjust ? What would have been said of Sir George, if he had had his army blown into the air, or cut to pieces ? If he and all his army had been captured, what would have been said of him and of that army ? Yet thia has happened to the fleet, and the fleet are complimented ! While he, who has saved a great part of his army, notwithstanding the defeat of the fleet, is censured BXidi abused; is called a fool, and almost a coward ' Sir George Prevost is neither fool nor coward. He is a man of great merit, is of long standing in the service, has served with great success; and he has shown great ability in be- ing able, with so small a force as he has hitherto had, to preserve a country generally inhabited by a people by no means zealous in their own defence, or rather that of their territory. Let any one look at the situation of Lake Champlain. It extends in length one hundred and fifty miles, perhaps, running above the state of Vermont, and entering our province of Lower Canada in a line pointing towards Quebec. It was very desirable to drive the Americans from the command of this lake, which may be called their high road to Montreal and Quebec. It is the great channel for their army, their provisions, their guns, to pass along ; and, completely the sole masters of this lake, it is not easy to conceive how they are to be kept from Quebec without a very large army from England. If the Americana had been defeated upon the l?ike, or had been compelled to retire to the Vermont end of it, then to have driven back their army also, would have been an object of vast importance ; nor would great loss in the attack, on pur part, have been an irretrievable loss, or been followed by any ex- tremely great danger. But when our fleet was not only defeated, but actually captured, auu gone off to double the force of the Ame- ricans, even the certain defeat of their army could have led to no beneficial result. We must still have abandoned Plattsburgh ; the fleet of the enemy would have speedily brought another ariuy to any point that they wished, and would have placed that army fifty or sixty miles nearer Quebec than our army would have been. . > ■* r iiii 96'4 Lettera of iViUium Cobbett, Esq. But if by any chance we had been defeated by landi after the de> feat on (be water, the loss of nU Canada would, and must have been the conie(|uence, if the Americans had chosen to conquer It* which, I dare say, they would. Therefore, it appears to me, that Sir George Frevost acted the only part which a sensible man, un* der such circumstances, could have for one moment thought of. He rittktd every thing in the attack, and if he succeeded, he gain- ed nolhing worth having. The loss of half hh army, which was the case of (be storming of Fort Erie, would have exposed him, even in case of success, to great peril. The Americans could have immediately poured an army (by means of their fleet) more numerous than his into Lower Canada ; they could have poured in, all the winter, militia and volunteers, from the populous and brave republican state of Vermont, while our governor bad, nmi could have, no hopes of receiving reinforcements until the middle &f next summer. For, supposing ua to have spare troops at Hali* fax, they could hardly sail thence before the middle of October, and before they might reach Quebec, the ice in the St. Lawrence might have scuttled or foundered their vessels. The St. Law* rence, our only channel to Canada from England or from Halifax, is full of mountains of ice till the month of June. I have seen a large mountain of ice ofT the mouth of that immense river on the 15th of June. I believe that no vessels of any considerable size ever attempt the navigation of that river much before June. Iri what a situation, then, would our governor have been placed if he had met with any serious loss in the storming of the fort at Platts* burgh ? And yet he is censured and abused for retreating, after the total capture of our cooperating fleet, while the oflBcers of that fleet arc praised to the skies. About three weeks ago, just after we heard of the burning of Washington City, I met Sir George Prevost's wagon between Portsmouth and Hayant. The carter was whistling along by the side of some nice fat horses. I could not help observing to oiy son how much happier this fellow was than his master, who had to govern Canadians and fight Ame- ricans. It is easy to talk about the " heroes of Toulouse,*' form- ing part of his army. The *' heroes of Toulouse" are said to have remonstrated against the retreat. They are said to have ex- pressed a desire to storm the fort. Sir George Prevost would, I dare say, have been of the same mind, if he bad bad reason to sup- pose that one half of the people within, were, as the peop'e «t Toulouse were, ready to join him. But he well k* <" con- trary. He knew that he bad to get into the fort t a river of blood. He had just seen the fate of our fleet ; ai knew, an " the heroes of Toulouse*' might have known, that tL nen in he fort were of the same stamp as those upon the water. Wf now find, from a detailed statement in the American papers, coming uom i , nL: httkra of WillMtn Cfobbdt, Esq* 353 con* river ew, as IP he uoa* autboritj, and accompanied by an account of killed and wounded in Ihe naval battle on (he lake, that our fleet had 93 p;^iin8 and ] ,050 men, while that of America had but B6 guns and 820 men ; our fleet was all taken but the gun-boats, carrying sixteen guna amongst them all. And yet the naval people are praiaedt while Sir George Prevost is censured. Whence arises this injustice ? Whence this security of the navy from all censure, and even from all criticism ? Do we feel that to censure any part of it is to dis- cover to the world that it is not always infallible ? Do we suppose, that in discovering our fears of its inferiority, iU point of quality, to thai of America, we shall make the world perceive the lamentable fact ? Are we fools enoiijrh to hope that the history of this battle can be hidden from France and tiie rest of Europe ? Why, then, this injustice ? Why not blame the naval part of the forces, if blame must fall somewhere ? I see no necessity for its falling any ivhere, for my part. We had eighty-four men killed and one hun- dred and ten wounded, which shows that there was some fighting. We had double the number killed and wounded that Jonathan had, which shows that Jonathan was the more able bodied and active of the two. A letter was, a little while ago, published as from one of our officers in the Chesapeake Bay, saying, that Jonathan must now look pretUj sharply about him. It appears from the result of this battle, that Jonathan does look pretty sharply about him. Now, then, let us hear what eflect this event has had upon the Times' newspaper, which, only a few weeks ago, insisted on it, that the American government must be displaced, that the Ame- ricans were cowards, that they cared nothing about their country, and that the states would soon divide, and come over, ore at a time, to the parent country. Now let us hear what this torch bearer of the war, this trumpet of five and sword, provoker to every act of violence and cruelty-^-let us hear what he now has to say ; he who has, for three years past, been urging the govern- ment on to this disastrous contest. " Halifax papers to the Cth instant, New-York to the 22d ulti- mo, and Boston to the 2.'}th, have been received. There is no dissembling that the popular outcry in Canada against Sir George Provost's conduct, on account of the late operations against Pittsburgh, is very general and very loud. We casmot pretend tp determine on the talents of this officer, or on the wisdom of his plans ; but we recur to the suggestions which we made at a very early period of the campaign, and regret exceedingly that one of our most experienced generals from Spain was not sent at once, flushed with victory, from the fields of Toulouse to ihe heart of the United States. Was it beneath the dignity of Lord Hift, or even of the dnke of Wellington ? Fatal prejudice ! To despise, to irritate, and, after all, not to snbdue our adversaries, is the w t and weakest of all policy. Now we have reduced ourselves \ 254 Letters of William Cohheit, Esq. to this dilemma, of being obliged to carry our point by main force^ or to retire from the contest ten times worse tlutn we began it, mth the mere postponement of an abstract question, which has no reference to our present state of peaco, with a fund of the bit- terest animosity laid up against m infuttiret with our flag dis- graced on the ocean and on the lakeSyand with the laurels withered at Plattsburgh, which were so hardly, but so gloriously earned, in Portugal, and Spain, and France. The spirit of the British . nation cannot stoop to the latter alternative; and, therefore, a£ whatever ri^kt at whatever expense^ we must embrace the former. The invaluable year lttl4, when the treachery of America was fresh in the minds of the European powers, is past. Already do they begin to relax in their deep and merited contempt of the servile hypocrite, Madison. Already do they turn a compas- sionating look on the smoking rafters of the would-be capitol. Presently, perhaps, the Russian cabinet may forget that the em- press Catherine* to her dying day, treated the Americans as rebels to their legal sovereign ; or the Spanish court, while it is endeavouring to rivet its yoke on Buenos Ayres, may join with the philosophers of Virginia in contending for the liberty of the seas. Such, and still greater political inconsistencies we have before now witnessed. Therefore, let time be taken by the fore- lock; let tiot another campaign be wasted in diversions and demonstrations ; let not another autumnal sun go down in dis- 6RACB ro TAB BRITISH ARMS. Commodore Macdonough's laconic note savours a little of affectation ; but we are sorry he , haft ^j favourable an opportunity for disp! :ying the brevity of his ' style to advantage. General Macomi's orders, however, are , sufficiently lengthy ; and, unfortunately, he also has some un- pleasant information to give us. He states that 14,000 British veterans have been foiled by 1,500 American regulars, and some few militia, the whole not exceeding 2,500 men. If he is correct in these estimates, it is surely high time that we should either give up teaching the Americans war, or send them some better instructors." The Jbrtner fs the bat, be assured ! Why should commodore M&cdonough be charged with affectation, because he writes a short letter ? He has no sons, or cousins, or patron's sons or cousins, or bastards, to recommend for the receipts of presents or pensions. But I have, at present, no room for further com* meat on this article. I will resume the subject in my next. / , |i| I / JLtitters of William Cobbettt Esq. 255 the •^ri*-** AMERICAN WAR. Negotiations at Ghent ; measures of the American congress/ battle near Fort Erie; Lake Ontario; despatches about the Lake Champlain battles ; British attack on Fort Mobile. — The nego- tiations at Ghent, though kept a secret from Johnny Bull, havie reached him, as most other disclosures do, through the tell-tale press of America. Oh ! that republic, and her press ! How many things the world knows through them! Is there no way of re- ducing them to silence ? Take it in hand, good people, and see if there be no means of accomplishing it. These negotiations show that Jonathan^ poor despised JonathaUt is not much less smart in the cabinet than he is in the field. Certainly nothing was ever better managed than this negotiation on the part o( Jonathan. He pricked our brains, and then would do nothing until he heard what the people of America should say. The ground of Messrs. Bay- ard, Gallatin, &c. was very reasonable ; for how could they be ex- pected to have instructions relating to matters never before matters of dispute ? The substance of the disclosure is this : we asked, as a preliminary, that the republicans should give up part of their territory, including those very lakes, and their own borders of those lakes, whereon they have defeated us, and which are their only secure barrier against us and our Indian allies. The presi- dent, of course, lost no time in laying these papers before the congress, who are said to have heard them with unanimous indig- nation ; and the Times newspaper tells us that " these papers have been made the means of uniting against us the rvJiole Ame- rican people.** Thou great ass, they were united against us be- fore. There were only a handful of " serene highnesses" and " Cossacks** in Massachusetts, the acquaintance of Mr. Henry, who were not united against us. This, I suppose, is the shift that you resort to in order to cover your disgrace, in having to an- nounce that Mr. Madison is " yet" president, and that he is not even " impeached." There is one passage in the last despatch of Mr. Monroe, worthy of great attention. He tells the plenipo- tentiaries that " there is much reason to presume that Great Bri- tain has now other objects than those for which she has hitlierto professed to contend.'* Probably he built this presumption on the language of our public prints, or on the report of a speech in parliament, attributed by those newspapers to Sir Joseph YorkCf one of the lords of the admiralty, in which report the reporters made Sir Joseph say, that we hti Mr. Madison to dbposb before we could lay down our arms. This report was published some tim? ill May or June ; and in August Mr. Monroe's despatch 256 Letltrs qf William Cobbett, Eeq, was written. However, be the ground of presumption what it would, Mr. Madison does not seem to have changed his tone on account of it ; and there can be no doubt that the people must have been greatly inflamed by such an impudent declaration. This shows what mischiefs newspapers can do. The war is, in great part, the war of the Times and the Courier, Let them, therefore, weep over the fate of our fleets and armies in Canada, and at Mobile. The measures of (he American congress seem to be of a very bold character, and 'well calculated for a war of long continuation. The president has not been afraid to lay bare all the wants of the government, and to appeal to the s6nse smd pa- triotism of the people. From every thing that I can discover, the noblesse of Massachusetts will not be able to prevent, or even im- pede, any of these measures. Johnny Bull is, in last Saturday's Gazette, treated to an account of the late bahle near Fort Erie, from which Jonathan sallied out upon General Drummond's army. According to this account, our loss was as follows : KILLED. Captainti • • • • • • 1 (ieutenantt • , » • * a Sergeants Rauk and file . . ^ • • • • 7 , • 105 .; WOUNDED. Lieutenant ootonels . • 3 Captains . ♦ 3 Lieutenantt « • 10 Enugni • ♦ 1 Sergeants • • 13 Drummers . • 1 Rank anid file . • U7 MISSING. Majors . . • 8 Captains , • 4 Lieutenants . • • 3 Ensigns . • 2 Adjutants . , I Surgeons . • , i Sergeants . . 21 Drummers , , 2 Rank and file . • 280 115 178 -S16 609 A most bloody battle ! The armies, on both sides, are hand- fuls of men. These are battles of a very different description from those of the Peninsultty as it was called. General Drum- mond complains of the overwhelming force of the enemy. How came he to besiege him then ? It was a sally^ observe, on the Kart of tbe Americans ; and it is the first time I ever heard of a saU /ing party being stronger than the army besieging them. In the teeth of fficts like these, the malignant ass of the Times newspaper has the impudence to say, with as much coolness as if he had Letlefi of tVitliam Cobbetty j&«^* 26? hand- jriplion Drum- How on the if a sal* In the spaper e had never heard of these things : " A peace between Great Britain and the United States can proper^ be made no where but in Ame- rica. The conferences should be carried on at New- York, or Philadelphia, having previously fixed at those places the head- quarters of a Picton or a Hill.^' If Mr. Madison had this writer in his pay, the latter could not serve the republican cause more efiectuaily than he is now doing. On Lake Ontario, our newspa- pers now say, that we have a decided superiority of force. Very Well. Let vs bear that in mind. Let us have no new versions after a battle shall have taken place. The official accounts rela- tive to the aJQfairs at Plattsburgh and Lake Ghamplain, are the most curious, certainly, that ever were seen. They consist of a mere account of the number of killed, wounded, and missing, up to the time that our army quitted, or was about to quit, Plattsburgh, that is to say, (mind the dates !) up (o the fourteenth of September* Not a word have we about the retreat from Plattsburgh, nor about the battle on Lake Champlain, though we have an account from Sir George Prevost, dated on the fourth of October. Mark that well. The despatch is said to have been dated on the eleventh, at Plattsburgh, but it contains the account of the losses to the four- teenth ! Let us hear the apology of the Times newspaper : " The return from the sixth to the fourteenth of September being enclosed in the despatch bearing date the eleventh, is easily ac- counted for, from the circumstance of that despatch not having been made up for some time after. Although despatches have arrived of a later date from Sir George Prevost, none have been received containing ani/ account o/'Ais retreat. Private letters* however, contradict the American statements of precipitation and embarrassment in Sir George's movements on that occasion. The despatch of the eleventh, before mentioned, refers to the action on the lake, but it is not thought proper to publish this until an offi* cial account of the action reaches the admiralty." Very well, now, let U3 grant that it would not be proper to publish Sir George's account of the action on the lake, though it was such a lumping concern as to require but little nautical skill to describe it ; yet heie is no reason at all given for not publishing Sir George's ac- count of his own retreat^ other than its not having beenreceived, which is most wonderful, seeing that it is the invariable practice to enclose duplicates and triplicates of every preceding despatch, when forces are at such a distance. How came Sir George, in bis despatch of the 4th of October, not to send a duplicate of the account of his retreat, if he had sent that account before ? And, if lie had not sent it before, how came he not to send it along with his despatch of the 4th of October ? The solving of these ques- tions will be very good amusement for the winter evenings of Johnny Bull, who was so anxious " to give the Yankees a good drubbing^'* and who thinks nothing at all of the pro{«erty tax '33 %6i Letters of William Cobbelt, Esii. when compared with bo desirable an object. Reader, pray let me bring you back to the affair of Plattsburgh. It is situated ob the side of Lake Cbamplain, about twenty •&¥€ miles within the United States. There i« a fortress near it, in which Jonathan bad 1,500 regulars, and 5 or 6^00 militia. Against this fort, and force, Sir George Prevost, with 14 or 15,000 men, marched early in September, the fort being to be attacked by water by our fleet at the same time that our army attacked it by land. The attack was made, but the American fleet came up, attacked ours, beat and captured the whole of the ships. Sir George Prevost, see- ing the fate of the fleet, retreated speedily into Canada, was foK lowed, as the Americans say, by thev army, who harassed it, took 8ome cannon, a great quantity of stores, and many prisoners, and received from the British army a great number of deserters, who quitted Sir George Prevost, and went over to them. This is the most serious part of the subject ; and, therefore, as the Montreal newspapers had stated Ihat we lost 150 men by desertion^ as the Americans made them amount to a great many hundreds ; and as Mr. Whitbread, in the debate in parliament, a few days ago, gaid he had heard that they amounted to 2,000, and that, too, of Wellingtonians, the people were very anxious to see Sir George PrevosCs account of his retreat* The ministers said that Sir George Prevost had said nothing about desertion ; and that, of course, Its would have mentioned U if it had been true. But the Times newspaper now tells us that Sir George has sent no account of hiH retreat ; or, at least, that none has been received. Accord- ing to the ministers, Sir George's account has been received, and no mention is made in it of desertion. According to the Times, Sir George's account has not been received. We must believe the ministers, of course, and must set the Times down for a pro- mulgator of wilful falsehoods. But, then, there is a nib left ; if the account of the retreat is come, why not publish it ? This is another riddle, Johnny Bull, for your winter evenings' amu3e- inent« The attack of our forces on Mobile, furnishes a new feature to the war. We have berore seen the two parties engaged, fri- gate to frigate, brig to brig, sloop- to> sloops and, in two instances, fleet to fleet. We have seen them on land, alternately besieged and besieging. We now see the Americans in a fort, containing only 138 men, attacked by a combined naval and military arma- ment ; as to the result of which, after describing the scene of ac- tion, we must, for the present, take their own official account. Foint Mobile is situated on the main land, on the border of the Gnlf of Mexico, not far from the mouth of the great river Mis- sissippi. On this point is a fort, called Fort Bowyer, belonging to the republican enemy, to the attack of which our squadronpro- ceeded in September last. [Here follow the American omcia!. accounts.! -z^^ ■ f Lmefkof William Cobhetl, Esq. 25^ 1 extract these articles from the Times newspaper ; and yet, in the face of these facts, in defiance of these red-hot balls, the consummate ass woald make no peace, except at New- York or Philadelphia^ they bemg first the head-quarters of a Picton or a Hill ! This is as good a lift as this writer could have given to Mr. Madison, and as bard a blow as he could have given to the noblesse of Massachusetts, on whom he and the rest of our war-tribe had buHt, and do still build, their hopes of ultimate success. Let them look at the attitude of New- York and Philadelphia. I do not say that it is impossible to get at either of those cities, with bomb-shells or rockets ; but I am quite satisfied, that it would require a very large army to set foot in either of them, even for the purpose of Jburning and then quitting them, in safety. I will now make an observation or two with regard to public opinion as to the Ame- rican war. People are disappointed. The continuance of the property tax pmches. But would they have the luxury of war without paying for it? No, no; pay they must; or they must put up with what they have gotten, and see the stars and stripes waving in every sea. They would have war. War was (heir crj. They have it, and they must pay for it. TO THE COSSACK PRIESTHOOD OF THB STATE Or MASSACHUSETTS. Gentleman, I Perceitb that there were held, in your state, and at your instigation, and under your guidance and ministry, solemn fasts and tlianksgivings on account of the entrance of the Cossacks into Paris, and of the fail of Napoleoa. Hence, I perceive, that you are called the Chaplains of the Cossacks ; and sometimes, the Cossack Priesthood, That you, who used to be regarded as some of the best men in your republic, and the purity of whose religious motives were never even doubted, should have exposed yourself to the application of such titles, I extremely regret to hear. But it is not my business to give way to private feelings upon such an occasion. It is for me, as far as I am able, and as I dare, to make truth known to the world ;* and as you, in this rase, appear to me to have shown a more decided hostility to truth than any other set of men of whom I have heard, not ex- cepting the editors of the London newspapers, it is natural for me to address myself to you upon the subject. The religion, of which you profess to be teachers, is the Pres- byterian. I believe, that there are three or four sorts of Pres- byterian Christians. To which of these sorts you belong, or whe- ther some of you are of the one sort and some of each of the others, I know not. Nor is it material j it being well known, hat, ~t.!.r a a? il ■?ri ] 8IB0 Letters of IVilliam Cobheltt Esq. substantialli/t all these sorts ar/e the same, and that the religion yoa profess has existed, and has been the generally prevailing reli> gion in the four eastern states of the republic, where there has been born and reared up an industrious, sober, humane, gentle, kind, brave, and free people, distinguished heretofore, above all others, for their right and clear understanding of the principles of liberty, and for their zeal and undaunted resolution in her cause. Whether the people would have been as good, better, or worse, i^ithout the religion that you have taught ; whether, discarding, as is the manner of some men, all mysteries, and believing in nothing the truth of which cannot be substantiated by undeniable facts, or by incontrovertible argument, they would have been as good, bet- ter, or worse, than they are, is a question, which I will not meddle with. But you will excuse me, if I observe, that, while this can possibly be made a question amongst rational men, you, who re- ceive pat/ for your teaching of religion, ought to be very careful to excite no doubt in the minds of mankind as to the purit; of yc'ur views, or the sincerity of your faith. Your recent conduct does, however, appear to have excited such doubts in the m^nds of your countrymen. In my mind it baa done more. It has convinced me that your motives are any thing rather than pure ; and that your professions are a mere pre^ tence ; a trick to enable you to live witlioiU labour upon the earn' ings of .those who do labour, just as are the trteksof monks and friars, and of all other imposers on popular credulity, from the golden-palmed showman of the lady ,of Loretto down to the lousy- cowled consecrators of halfpenny strings of beads, and the itine- rant protcstant bawlers, whose harangues are wholly incomprehen- sible, until they come round with their hat to collect the means of recruiting the belly. All the zeal of impostors of every kind ; all their calumnies of others ; all their innumerable persecutions of those who have endeavoured to withdraw the people from their degrading influence, have had this great end in view : to extract and, secure to themselves the means of living nell, without labour, out of the earnings of those who do labour. I am very sorry to ascribe such a motive to you, whose forefathers fled to a wilderness rather than violate the dictates of their conscience ; but truth com- pels me to say, that )^ou appear to have no claim to an exemption from the general charge. Yet, I am not so unjust as to suppose, much less to hold forth to ihe world, that all the priests of Mas- sachusetts are of this description ; but, as I find no account of any protest, on the part of any of the pries(i3, against the odious and detestable celebrations and fasts before mentioned, I shall stand fully justified for not making any particular exceptions. If any of the priests of Massachusetts feel sore under the appella* tion which I have given them, they ought to direct their resentf ment against those whose conduct has brought it upon them, and LdUra of WUliam Cobbetij Esq, 991 not agfunBt me, unless they are able to show that I charge them unjustly. Had you, indeed, confined your thanksgivings to the release of certain countries of Europe from the arms of an invader, a con- queroTt an oppressoTf an ambUiotis despot,, who, instead of giving Uberty, added to the civil sufferings of some of the nations whom he overran, having first extinguished republican government, and along with it political liberty in France, where the people had put power into his hands to be used in the cause of freedom. Had you held solemn thanksgivings on account of the triumph of the Cossacks, and their associates, in the cause of the civil and poli- tical independence of nations, you would not have excited indig- nation in the breast of any reasonable man ; for, though some men would have differed with you in opinion upon that point ; though some men would have said, as some men thought,, that the con- queror could not long have held under his sway so extensive an empire as he was grasping ; that, in a few years, the several coun- tries of which it was composed, beginning with France, would, in all human probability, throw off his yoke, and form themselves into independent states, freed from all his, as well as all former shackles ; and that, thus, he would, in the end, be found to have been instru- mental in establishing liberty, civil as well as religious, in every part of Europe where it did not before exist ; though some men would have said this, and would, of course, not have joined you in your thanksgivings for the victories of the Cossacks, no just and considerate man could have censured you, so long as you con- fined your thanksgivings to the aforementioned objects. But when, in your prayers and sermons, you called the Cossacks, and others engaged on the same side, " the bulwark of your religion ;" when, with the Reverend Mr. PARISH at your head, you called Napoleon anti'Christ, and bawled out songs of praise to the Cos- sacks and their associates for pulling him down ; and especially when you maliciously threw on your political opponents the charge of being the abettors of anti-Christ; then you excited the indig- nation of all those who did not turn with disgust from your horrid ejaculations and harangues. If there was one trait, above all others, by which your ser- mons and prayers, until of late years, were characterized, it was by your zealous, your violent, not to say foul-mouthed attacks on the Romish Pontiff*, faith, and worship. You had no Escruple to represent the pope as anii-Christ, and as the scarlet w/io re of Babylon, covered with abominations. How clearly did you prove that he was the beast of the revelations ; that he had made the world drunk with his fornications ; that his seven heads were the seven hills on which Rome is situated ; his ten horns the ten prin- cipal Catholic sovereigns of Europe ; and that his colour was scarlet, because it was dyed in the blood of the saints ? Was there 'i:^ |l m 262 LetUn of fyUliam Cohbett, Esq, a €erinoD» was there a prayer, that issued from your lips, in which you did not call on the Lord for vengeance on this " man of sin** and in which you did not describe the Catholic religion as idola- trou8t bkupkemoust diabolicalf and as evidently tending to the ttemal damnation of milliom and milliona of precious sotds ? Every one who shall read what I am now writing, must acknow- ledge, that this description of your conduct, in regard to the Romish church, is far short of the mark. What, then, have you now to say in justification of your recent conduct t Where is your justification for your violent attacks on Napoleon and his family, to say nothing, at present, of your thanksgivings for the restora- tion of the ancient order of things, or, in your own language, " the ancient and venerable instittUions /"* Where is your justification for your attacks on the Buonapartes ? Others, indeed, might con- sistently attack them. Such as thought that the church of Rome and her power were good things ; or, such as regarded one religion as good as another, might consistently attack Buonaparte. But ifou! you, who professed the opinions above described ; how can you apologize to the world, and to your abused flocks, for the part which you have taken against him ? The case, with regard to you, stands thus : There was, before Buonaparte's power commenced, existing in Europe a system of religion, or, as you called it, irreligion, having at the head of it a Sovereign Pontiff, with innumerable Cardinals, Bishops, Vicars* General, Abbots, Priors, Monks, Friars, Secular Prieats, &c. &c. under him. To this body you ascribed false doctrines, tricks, frauds, and cruelties without end. You charged them with the propagation of idolatry and blasphemy ; with keeping the people in ignorance ; with nourishing superstition ; with blowing the flames of persecution ; with daily murdering, in the most horrid manner, the martyrs to the true faith. The Sovereign Pontiff himself, the corner-stone of the whole body, you constantly called anti- Christ, the Scarlet Whore, the Beast, and the Man of Sin, And you prayed most vehemently for his overthrow, insisting that the system, of which he was the foundation, manifestly tended to the eternal damnation of the souls of the far greater part of the people of Europe. Well! Napoleon arose. He hurled down the pope; he over- threw the anti-Christ, the Scarlet Whore, the Beast, the Man of Sin, and with him all the long list of persecutors of the saints. Napoleon and his associates did, in three years, what your prayers and preachings had not been able to effect in three centuries. The pope was stripped of all temporal power ; the cardinals and bishops were reduced to mere ciphers ; the monks were driven from their dens of laziness and debauchery ; the tricks and frauds were exposed; the adored images were turned into firewood; the holy relics were laughed at ; the light of truth was suffer* Litlen of William Cobbellt Esq, sea ed freely to beam upon the minds of the people ; religious perser cution was put an end to ; and all men weire not only permitted, but also encouraged, openly to profeBs, pursue, and enjoy, what- ever species of religious faith and worship they chose. Every man became eligible to offices, trusts, and honours ; and, tbruugh- cut the domains of Italy and France, where a Presbyterian would bave been tied to a stake and roasted rather than be suffered to fill an office of trust, or to preach to a congregation, religious liberty was, under Napoleon, made as perfect as in Pennsylvania^ and more perfect than in your state of Massachusetts* These are facts which none of you, not even Mr. Parish, will dare openly to deny. They are as notorious as they will be, and plight to be, memorable. Ought you not, therefore, to have rejoiced at this wonderful change in favour of religious liberty I How could you see fifty millions of souls set free without feeling it impossible to suppress an expression of your pleasure ? How could you see the fall of anti-Chriit without putting up thanksgiving to that God to whom you bad so long been praying, whom you had so long been wor- rying with»your importunities, for the accomplishment of that ob- ject ? Was not this an event calculated to call forth your grati- tude to Heaven ? Ought it not to have been expected from yoUy that you should speak very cautiously in disapprobation of Napo^ leon and the French republicans, who had effected what you had 10 long been praying for, apparently, in vain ? Ought you not, if you had spoken at all of the sins of his ambition ; if you had blamed him as an mvader, a conqueror, a destroyer of republican freedom ; to have touched him with a tender hand, considering the immense benefits which religious liberty had received in consequence of hia invasions and conquests? Ought he not to have found inyou, above all men living,, if not impartial judges, at least, mild and moderate censors ? If this was what might naturally and justly have been expected from you, what must have been the surprise and indignation of those who saw you amongst the very fiercest of Napoleon's foes ; amongst the foulest of his calumniators ; amongot the first and loudest of those who rejoiced at his fall ; who saw you holding solemn fasts and thanksgivings for his overthrow; who heard you hail with holy rapture the return of *' the ancient order of things,'* and the re-establishment of the " venerable instilutions** of Eu* rope ; who heard you joining in the hosannas of the monks, styling the Cossacks, and their associates, '^ bulwarks ef religion," " deliverers^* and " saviours ;" who heard you, in the words of Mr. PA.KISH, shifting, from the pope to Napoleon himself, the im- putation of being anti'Christ, and charging your political oppo- nents with being the abetters of that " Scarlet Whore," that " Man of Sin I" What must have been the surprise and mdigna- I! ' ■ V 'i > ■ ^ I 264 htHtn of William Cohhttl^ Esq* tlon of thoae who were the witnesses of your conduct upon this memorable occasion ? How yon may stand, at this time, in the estimation of your flocks, it is iropossibie for me to know ; but if you still preserve your former weight and consequence, I must say that you exhibit an instance of success, of which, in an en- lightened country, no former set of impostors ever had to boast. What was that " ancient order of things,** the return of which you hailed with such rapture? What were those "venerable institutions," of which you thanked the Lord for the approaching re-establishment ? The holy see of Rome was one, and the inqui- sition was another. Thousands of subaltern " venerable institu* tiouB," naturally followed in the train of these ; such as the Tir' gin Mary's house at Loretto ; the shrine of Saint Anthony ; ttie holy cross ; the exhibition of Saint Catherine's Wheel, of the Holy Thorn that penetrated Christ's cheek, of the Breeche3 of Saint Polomo, so eflicacious with barren wives, especially by a lusty monk. Hundreds and thousands of thousands of these " venerable" things, naturally followed the overthrow of him who had overthrown them. All the persecutions of the Protestants; ail the frauds, insolence, and cruelty, of the Romish priests must have been in your view. You are not ignorant men. On the contrary, you are some of the most cunning even of priests. You knew to a moral certainty that the pope, whom you had for" roerly led your flocks to believe was anti-Christ, would be re- stored. You knew that, instead of a milder sway, he would naturally be more rigid than ever in the exercise of his power* All this you knew. You knew that the toleration of all Protes- tant sects, the encouragement of them, the free use of reason on religious subjects, and the free circulation of religious opinions, which were so complete under Napoleon, would be instantly de- stroyed in the far greater part of Europe. And yet you held a solemn thanksgiving to God that Napoleon had been overthrown^ and you had the impious hypocrisy to call his enemies " the bul- warks of religion ;" you; aye, i/oii, whose fathers fled to a wilder- ness across the sea, rather than live where they were not permit* ted openly to denounce as damnable the remnants which the church of England had preserved of that very religion of which the enemies of Napoleon were the bulwark, and which you now thanked God for the prospect of seeing restored. The Holy Father, whom you formerly called the " Scarlet Whore," dyed in the blood of the saints 5 the '' Beast," as you used to call him, whose " mouth was full of blasphemies,'* re- mounted his chair even before " the Most Christian King" got upon his throfie. One of his first acts was to restore the Jesuits, that ** ancient and venerable institution," which had become so odious, on account of its wicked acts, that it bad been abolished by all the princes of Europe, and even by a former pope himself. « >v I Ldleriof WUliam Cohhettf Esq, Se5 arlet you re- got mils, le so Tbe next remarkable step was the re-establishment of the Inqui- iition in Spain, where it had been abolished by Napoleon on th« day that he took posseacion of the government of that country ; and, what is worthy of particular notice, though perfectly natural, *' Ferdinand the beloved^* in his ordinance, dated 23d July last, for the re*eatablishuient of that horrid tribunal, makes use of almost your very langtutge, in reproaching Napoleon with itt abolition, as you will see by the ordinance itself, annexed to this letter. You yourselves well know what that tribunaf was ; but, as some of the good people, whom you have deceived, may not know th« precise nature of that '* venerable institution," which Napoleon abolished, and which has been restored in consequence of the successes of your '* bulwarks of religion " I will here insert aa account of it from the last edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, referring your flocks to Mr. Pobson's greatly improved Philadel- phia edition, that they may verify the correctness of the extract, which they will find under the words " Inquisition^* and " Act of Paith" as follows : « INaUISITION.— In the church of Rome, a tribunal, ia several Roman Catholic countries, erected by the popes for the examination and punishment of heretics. This court was founded, in the twelfth century, by Father Dominic, and his followers, who were sent by Pope Innocent III., with orders to excite the Catho- lic princes and people to extirpate heretics, to search into their number and quality, and to transmit a faithful account thereof to Rome. Hence they were called inquisitors ; and this gave birth to the formidable tribunal of the inquisition, which was received in all Italy, and the dominions of Spain, except the kingdom of Naples and the Low Countries. This diabolical tribunal takes cognizance of Heresy, Judaism, Mahometanism, Sodomy, and Polygamy ; and the people stand in so much fear of it, that parents deliver up their children, husbands their wives, and masters their servants, to its officers, without daring, in the least, to murmur. The prisoners are kept for a long time, till they themselves turu their own accusers, and declare the cause of their imprisonment ; for they are neither told their crime* nor confronted with witnesses. As soon as they are imprisoned their friends go into mourning, and speak of them as dead, not daring to solicit thjeir pardon, lest they should be brought in aa accomplices. When there is no shadow of proof against the pre- tended criminal, he is discharged, after suffering the most cruel tortures, a tedious and dreadful imprisonment, and the loss of the greatest part of his effects. The sentence against the prisoners b pronounced publicly, and with the greatest solemnity. In Por- tugal, they erect a theatre capal)le of holding 3,000 persons, ia which they place a rich altar, and raise seats ea each side in the 34 ife I Ji 26d Letters of WUliam Cohhdt, Esq, i' I form of an amphitheatre. There the prisoners are placed \ an^ over against them is a high chair, whither they are called, one by by one, to hear their doom from one of the inquisitors. These unhappy people know what they are to suffer by the clothes they wear tliat day. Those who appear in their own clothes are dis- charged, upon payment of a fine ; those who have a aanio benito, or strait yellow coat without sleeves, charged with St. Andrew's cross, have Iheir lives, but forfeit all their effects ; those who have the resemblance of flames, made of red serge, sewed upon their aanlo benilo, without any cross, are pardoned, but threatened to be burnt if ever they relapse ; but those who, besides these flames, have on their aanlo benito their own picture, surrounded vrith figures of devils, are condemned to expire in the flames. The inquisitors, who are ecclesiastics, do not pronounce the sen- tence uf death ; but form and read an act, in which they say that the criminal being convicted of such a crime, by his own con* fessioii, is, with much reluctance, delivered to the secular power, to be punished according to his demerits ; and this writing they give to th« seven judges, who attend at the right side of the altar, who immediately pass sentence.'* «' ACT OF FAITH.— In the Romish church, is a solemn day, held by the inquisition for the punishment of heretics, and the absolution of the innocent accused. They usually contrive the Auto to fall on some great festival, that the execution may pass with the more awe and regard ; at least it is always on a Sunday. The Atito da Fe, or Act of Faiths may be called the last act of the inquisitorial tragedy ; it is a kind of gaol-delivery, appointed as oft as a competent number of priitoners in the inquisition are con- victed of heresy, either by their own voluntary, or extorted confes< sion, or on the evidence of certain witnesses. The process is thus : In the morning they are brought into a great hall, where they have certain habits put on, which they are to wear in the procession. The procession is led up by Dominican friars ; after which come the penitents, soc^o with san-bmitoes, and some with- out, according to the nature of the crimes ; being all in black coats without sleeves, and barefooted, with a wax candle in their hands. These are followed by the penitents who have narrowly escaped being burnt, who, over their black coats, have flames painted, with their points turned downwards, Fuego revollo. Niext come the negative and relapsed, who are to be burnt, haying flames on their habits pointing upwards. After these come such<.as profess doc- trines contrary to the faith of Rome, who, besides flames pointing upwards, have their picture painted on their breasts, with dogs> serpents, and devils, all open mouthed, about it. Each prisoner IS attended with a familiar of the inquisition ; and those to be burnt have also a Jesuit on each hand, who is continually preaching to .them to abjure. After the prisoners, come a troop of familiars on 1 LHtertqfWUliam Cohhett, Esq. 267 )'!! Iioneback, and after tbem the iaquinitorB, and other officers of (he court, on mulea ; last of all, the iiiquiaitor general, on a white horse, led by two men with black hats and green hatbands. A scaffold *i erected in the Teniero de Paca^ big enough for two or three taousand people ^ at one end of which are the prisoners, at the other the inquisitors. After a sermon, made up of encomiums of the inquisition, and invectives against heretics, a priest ascends a desk near the middle of the scaSbld, and having taken the abjura- tion of the penitents, recites the final sentence of thoue who are to be put to death ; and delivers them to the secular arm, earnestly beseeching, at the same time, the secular power not to touch their blood* or put their lives in danger. The prisoners being thus in the hands of the civil magistrate, are presently loaded with chains, and carried first to the secular gaol, aod from thence, in an hour or two, brought before the civil judge ; who, after asking in what religion thpy intend to die, pronounces sentence on such as declare ihey die in the communion of Rome, that they shall be first stran- gled, and then burnt to ashes ; on such as die in any other faith, that they be burnt alive. Both are immediately carried to the Hibera, the place of execution, where there are as many stakes set up as there are prisoners to be burnt, with a quantity u\' dry furze about them. The stakes of the profesaed, that is, such as persist in their heresy, are about four yards high, having a small Doard towards the top for the prisoner to be seated on. The ne- gative and relapsed being first strangled and burnt, the professed mount their ati^es by a ladder | and the Jesuits, after several re- peated exhortations to b« reconciled to the church, part with them, telling theni they leav« them \o the devil, who is standing at their elbuw to receive their souls and carry them with him into the flames of bell. On this a great shout is raised, and the cry is, Let iliedogs* beards be made; which is done by thrusting flaming furzes fastened to long poles against their faces, till their faces are burnt to a coal, which is accompanied with the loudest acclama- tions of joy. At last, fire is set to the furze at the bottom of the stake, over which the professed are chained so high, that the top of the flame seldom reaches higher than the board they sit on ; so that they rather seem roasted than burnt. There cannot be a lubre lamentable spectacle; the sufferers continually cry out, while they are able, misericorda per amor de Dios, * Pity for the love x)f God!' yet it is beheld by all sexes and ages with tranSf ports of jpy and satisfaction." People of Massachusetts! Sons of Englishmen, who fled to a wilderness, who sacrificed their dearest connexions to religiotts liberty! Merciful, humane, gentle, kind, and brave people of Massachusetts, though your Cossack priests can view with dry f yes and unmoved muscles this horrid spectacle, does it not chill ^ijie blood in ^ow veins ? Though Ihey, with holy impudence, caj| f,i.-f 'ii' 298 LeitMo/milmm Cobheh, Ei«j. put iip thanksgivings for the fall of hitn by ithata this <* venerable institution^' had been overthrown, and of whose fall its revival was iL natural, if not certain, consequence ; do not ifwr hearts revolt lit the impioosness, the basenest, the cruelty, of the sentiment ? People of Massachusetts, (for to jout- hardened priests will I no longer addrt^s myself,) what can have been the real cause of thii conduct oil the part of your priests ? In the people of England it was very natural and reasonable to rejoice at the fall of Napoleon. He had immense power ; he was near them ; he had threatened to invade their country } he had made preparations for so doing. It was, therefore, natural for them to rejoice at his fall ; but even here, with the exception of a few hypocrites, despised by persons of sense, oTall parties, people did not rejoice at his fall as an ene* my of religion. Had your priests not put Up thanicsgivings for the deliverance of religion, their conduct might have been passed over ; but when they made that the ground of their gratitude to the Cossacks and to Heaven, they invited the lash of censure ; they called aloud for the detestation of mankind. While, indeed, the Fiench nation seemed to have thrown aside cM rtligion whatever; while they were setting aside all the me- inorials and marks of the Christian era ; while they were appa- rently all atheists, there was some reason for your priests to wish theu: overthrow. Even in that cast, however, they would have shown more confidence in Christianity, if they had been less bitter against the French. Some men thought that their extreme aspe- rity against such writers as Paine, seemed not to say that they possessed ability to defeat him in the field of argument ; and, indeed, seemed to argue that they did not feel a sufficient degree of confi- dence in the goodness of their cause itself; for, if they had been thoroughly convinced, as they ought to have been, that the Cibrisr tian religion was built upon a rock, and that the gates of hell would never prevail against it, Paine would have been an object of their pity rather than of their perseciUion. Their anger against him was madness, unless they apprehended danger from his attemp.^ : and ii" they did apprehend danger from those attempts, they ghowbd a want of sufficient confidence in their cause itself, which want of confidence should have taught them moderation in thejf attacks on the adversary. There was a great ontcry about atheism in France ; but what was it, after all, but letting (he liuman mind loose, to range at pleasure ? When every u'an was at liberty to say what he liked, who need have been ir< fear for the cause of truth? He who was an insincere Christian; he who doiihteiof the truth of Christianity ; he who thought it false, but who pro* fessed it from interested motives, had reason to rail against the innovators ; but he who was a real believer, and whose belief was founded on the conclusions of reason, could not possibly have any ground for alarm, seeing that freedom of discussion is, and etei:- I i lAtkr» of WUlitm Cohhett, Esq* 269 /ii taily muBt bej favourable to truth ; and, of course, hostile fo itrror Atidfalathood. Those, therefore, who are opposed to free- dom of discussion, on any subject, and who make use of clamours, •landers, or force, to prevent it, may, in all cases, and acting Under whatever pretence, be safely considered as wishing to Sustain error or falsehood. But these observations do not apply to the case of the emperor Napoleon. However just the hatred of your priests against the atheists of France, there was no portion of that hatred due to him who re-opened the churches, who invited the performance of religious worship, who encouraged the people to make provt- ■ion for the maintenance of the parochial clergy, who went very regularly to hear mass himself; but who, at the same time, ef«> fectually prevented all religious persecution ; who countenanced and encouraged all religious sects ; who put tbem all upon a footing of civil and political equality ; and who, throughout his vast dominions, was speedily introducing such a system, as to re- ligion, as 'Bust, in a few years, have inevitably rooted out every Cibre of puperstitioo, and have put an end for ever to that spirit of perscicution, which had so long been filling Europe with misery and crimes. Be he, therefore, what he might, in other respects, he had been, and he was, a friend and protector of religious freedom^ This quality, one would have thought, was that which, above all others, ought to have pleaded in his behalf with your priests ; yet they rejoiced at his fall ; they hailed his enemies as the ^' bulwarks of religion ;" they put up thanksgivings for the re- storation of the *' venerable institutions" which he had pulled down ; and they even called him " anti-Christ," th^ appellation which they had formerly given to the pope. Let your priests say what they will of the French republicans, and of Napoleon, the world are witnesses to the fact, that, even though a counter-revolution has taken place in France, that coun- try has derived immense advantages from the revolution ; that she '«! now freed from numerous oppressions before endured ; that her agriculture has made astonishing progress j that she has got rid of her feudal tyrannies, her monkSf her tythes ; that her farmers are now able to undersell ours in our own markets ; that her manufactures are greatly increased ; and that, as yet, her king has not ventured to overthrow Napoleon's laws, securing to all men perfect religious liberty, and an equality as to all matters connected wi(h religious worship and the public capacities of the professors of diflerent religions. Nothing could he a greater compliment to Napoleon, than the stipulation with the king that NAPOLEON'S CODE, civil and religious, should, remain untouched. What ground, then, could »/o»{r priests have for their implacable :'> ■H 270 Letters of William Cohbett, Esq. I'd liatred of Napoleon ? Why did they put up thankagivingi for hii overthrow ? Why did they call the Cossacks nud their associates the "bulwarks of religion? * Why did they call hiui the oppressor of Spain, who had abolished the inquisition, and had driven the monks from their convents and their luxury ? What could have I>'e from their above-described conduct, unsupported by any othei iact ; if any other proof were wanted, you have that proof in their electioneering tricks of last year, when, a.'uongst their objections to the electing of a republican, or, as they termed it, democratic legislature, they complained of a former democratic legislature in these memorable words: *'They impaired the constitutional provision /or the support of a public ■juo/ship, by releasing the disaffected from contributing to tl f sup- port of permanent teachers of piety, religion, and morality.'^* • Note. All reU!!:ion8 were always tolerated in Massachusetts; but there "wcj h Jaw, before the republiciinsKO* the ir|>)ier hand, to obU^e ex>ery per ton to ecr\ir\\>\A^ m Uie tHriiiUenaiu'f; of puhtic f>fotettant -worship, to lii» oivn teachert, if ha had Ally; if lie had none of his .iwii, to the priest of t/u! parish -wherein he resided. The I'cpuliticans appear to have left every niau tree to pay to any sect, or to no «>.'(.•< at a!>, UK the just md wifo William Penn left the matter in rennsytvauia. 7'hi8 was ilic crime of tlic republicans, .ii tlic eyes of the priests of Massachusetts. XVhcther-thc fcderaiists have biucc saddled the people with a tax ou at«onut of r^- l^:jion, 1 kuow niK. W-} m.\ tiO helUts of William Cobldtt Esij, 27% That is to saj, they complained of the « democrats'* for having endeavoured to make Massachusetts, in point of religioua liberty, what William 'enn made Pennsylvania, and what Napoleon had fuade, as nearly as he possibly could, France and Italy, and all tin', countries wiiich he had conquered. Here we see the REAL ground of the hostility of your priests to the French re- publicans, to Napoleon, and to the republican party in America. They had long enjoyed the benefices of a sort of established and dominant church ; they had long been receiving compulsory pay mentsfor their tupport ; they hac 'ong felt the agreeable effects of this " venerable institution." The example of France, and the practical effect thereof in America, had shaken their hold of valdable possession ; and hence, and hence alone, their abuse of the French and Napoleon ; their dread of the continuance of his power ; their exultation at his overthrow ; and their thanksgiving!) for the restoration of those "venerable institutions" in Europe; those ecclesiastical powers and profits, which kept their own in countenance, and of which the French and Napoleon had been the determined enemies. No more rjeed be said. You, the people of Massachusetts, who possess so much good sense, who have so often exercised that good sense as to other persons and things, cannot long re« main the dupes of these hypocrites, who, while they have the desire of your welfare in the next world constantly on their lips, are manifestly inrent upon securing to themselves, in this world, ease and plenty, at the public expense. Wm. Cobbett. \i%i m C >iup- POSTSCRIPT. The following is the decree of the king of Spain, re-establish- ing the inquisition, published in a supplement to the Madrid Ga- zette, 23d July, 1814: " The King our Lord has been pleased to enact the following decree. The glorious title of Catholic, by which the kings of Spain are distinguished among the other Christian princes, because they do not tolerate in their kingdom any one rvho professes another religion than the Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman, has powerfully excited my heart to employ all the means which God has placed in my hands, in order to make myself worthy of.it. The past troubles and war which afflicted all the provinces of the kingdom, during the space of six years ; the residence therein, during that time, of foreign troops of dijfereni sects, almost all in- fected with abhorrence and hatred to the Catholic religion ; and the disorder that these evils always bring with them, together with the little care which was taken, for some time, in providing for what concerned the things of religion, gave to the wicked un- a. pMB l^u 1 n ffv ^72 Litters of WiUiam Cobhdt, Esq, limited license to live after their free will, and to introduce in this kingdom* and fix in manj persons, pernicious opinions, by the aame means with which they had been propagated in other coun< tries : Desiring, therefore, to provide a remedy ag^nst so great an evil, and preserve in my dominions the holy religion of Jesus Chrbt, which my people love, and in which they have lived and do live happily, both by the duty which the fundamental laws of the kingdom impose on the prince which shall reign over it, and I have sworn to observe and fulfil, as likewise being the most proper means to preserve my subjects from intestine dissentions, and maintain them in peace and tranquillity, I have thought it would be very convenient, in the present circumstances, that the tribunal of the Holy Office should return to the exercise of its Jurisdiction : Upon which subject wise and virtuous prelates, and many corporations and serious persons, both ecclesiastical and secular, have represented to me, that it was owing to this tribunal that Spain was not contaminated, in the sixteenth century, with the errors that caused so much affliction in other kingdoms, the nation flourishing at that time in all kinds of literature, in great men, in holiness and virtue : And that one of the principal means employed by the oppressor of Europe, in order to sow corruption and discord, from which he derived so many advan- tages, was to destroy it, under pretence that the light of the c^e could not bear its continuancf any longer; and which, t^erniardSf the self-styled general cortes, with the same pretence, and that of the constitution, which they had tumultuously framed, arinuUed, to the great sorrow of the nation. Wherefore, they have ardently requested me to re-establish that tribunal ; and, according to their requests, and the wishes of the people, who, from love to the reli* gion of their fathers, have restored, of their own accord, some of the subaltern tribunals to their functions, I have resolved, that the Council of the Inquisilionf and the other tribunals of the Holy Office, should be restored and continued in the exercise of their jurisdiction, both ecclesiastical, which, al the request if my august predecessors, the pontiffs gave to it, and the royal, which the kings granted to it, observing, in the exercise of both, the ordinances by which they were governed in 1808, and the laws and provisions, which, to avoid certain abuses, and moderate Hume privileges, it was mete to take at different times As, besides these provisions, it may, perhaps, be suitable to adopt other; and my intention being to improve this establishment, that the greatest utility may arise to my subjects from it, I wish that, as soon as the Council of the Inquisition shall meet, two of its members, with two others of my fioyal Council, both of which I shall nominate, should examine the form and mode of proceed* ing in the causes appertaining to the Holy Office^ and the method eHtablfsbed for the ceosucc and proliiliitiou of books ; and if there Letttraqf William Cobbett, Esq. 2r3 ' '0 ihotild be found any thiog in it contran to the good of my Bub- jecfs, aiid the upright administration of justice, or that ought io be altered, it shall be proposed to nie, that I may determine WhaC' shall be proper. This is communicated for your information, and ' of whom it may concern. "« Po/oce, 21s; July, 1814. «THE KING. ^ ^^*ToDonPtdrodeMacanas.** "^ ■I ■»•) : >i some , that ^ of the cise of f my which h, the laws derate A8, adopt It, that that, of its which oceed- Bnelbod f there b To the Knights, Grand Crosses, Commanders and Companions^ ^6f the Orders of the BULWARK and the HE\R[ADE,'| lately assembled in fall Chapter, at HARTFORD, in ^'ea>' ;' England, *t . • . ■ .. ■ H Mr^entlemm, '** '"^' Aa your occupation appears to have been suddenly put*^^ an end to by the peace, which our government has had the wis- * dom to make with yours, it may amuse and please you to be in- fortiied how the glorious work of deliverance proceeds in Europe. "^ I was highly delighted to perceive, that you were very careful to ' avail yourselves of the aid of the Cossack Priesthood, during^ your late deliberations. The long prayers, which it was resolved^ f those gentry should put up, two or three times a day, was not the *- least interesting part of your measures. It must glad your hearts ^ to hear, that the pope, the Jesuits, all the monks (e cept in disor- ^^ ganised France) have been not only delivered, but fully re-estab- ** lished by the efforts of the BULWARK ; and that, in Spain, * the HOLY INQUISITION has been so completely delivered - " from the " fell grasp,^^ as Mr. Randolph calls it, of Napoleon, that it is now under the paternal sway of " Ferdinand the belov- ed," in full vigour of operation for the support of " social order, and of ancient and " venerable establishments." In this opera- tion it has laid hold of — nho, think you ? Why of those men who, for several years, were fighting and writing for " Ferdinand the beloved;" that is to say, for the BULWARK, againat the de- stroyer of vener ble institutions. Some of these " patriots," as they were called, having taken refuge in our fortress of Gibraltar, have been given up by our governor to the beloved Ferdinand, whose goven^ment has sent one of them to work in the galleys for ten yearn. Ai»other of them has escaped to England, where his cause has been espoused by Mr. Whitbrbad, who, though not a BULWARK man, seems to have been applied to by this BUL- WARK Spaniard in preference to the government here, though one would have thought that he would fly to his old friends to be 35 * '"■' '"^ >• iifiiCIS I *1 '4 I % 274 ttUera of William Cohbeit, Esq* receivfld with open arms. Mr» Whitbbead has made several very eloquent speeches upon the subject; but, to saj th^ truth, tbej have produced but little eifect upon me, and this for two reasons : First, these bulwark men/ougf/t( and wrote for Fe<-di' nand ; they called every one a traitor and a miscreant, who did not wish for the restoration of the ancient family, the venerable insti- tutions. In the course of their proceedings, they levelled their riwords and their pens against the lives of all those, who wished not to be delivered ; they drew forth the sweat and blood of their country against him who had put down the monks and the inquisi- tion ; they persecuted every man who acted as if he dreaded the deliverance of Spain* In their turn they are persecuted ; they are sent to jails and galleys ; and you will please to observe, that they suffer this from those for whom tliey had fought, in whose behalf they had persecuted others, and are delivered up, too, by an English governor. I think, may it please your knighthoods, that this is as suitable, as fit, as exemplary, as any human occurrence can well be. My other reason for taking little interest in the fate of these men, is, that I feel more for persons in our English, Scotch, and Irish jails. The patriot who is sent to the galleys, was charged with the crime of LIBEL. He, it is acknowledged, wrote a letter to the beloved Ferdinand, advising him to adopt a new government in Spain ; that is to say, to consent to a revolu- tion, that horrid thing, which is so contrary to those ancient and venerable institutions, to restore which so much blood and mon^y has been expended ; and for the restoration of which you have so long and so fervently prayed through the nose, with your eyes turned up towards the ceiling. Now, while there are so many men in our jails for writing libels ; while I recollect that so many gentlemen were sent from Scotland to Botany Bay, on the charge of attempting a revol'iiion in our government ; and while I hear no word from Mr. V/hi thread in their behalf, that gentleman must excuse me, if I am very litde moved by his eloquence, great as it is, in behalf of these Spaniards. There is a Mr. LovELfi who has been in our jail of Newgate about/our i/ears and a half. His offences were cop^'ing a short paragraph from a country pa- per relative to the operation of the Fropekty Tax, and publish- ing another paragraph, or letter, relative to the conduct of the transport board towards French prisoners of war. He might be in error in both instances ; but h.s affidavits showed, that he was the autlior of neither publication ; that he copied one, inadver- tently, from a country newspaper, and that he did not examine the other with sufficient care. He was sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment for each, and was fined besides ; and he is now in jail, where he has been for a year and a half, wanting ability to pay his tines. Mr. Houston is suffering two years imprison- ment and fine for a book on religion* Away, then, with the com- ^n Lttters of William Cohbeitj Esq, 276 plaints of Don Carrea and Don Puigblanc, and all the dont in the universe, till Mr. Lovell and Mr. Houston, and othersi find some- body to feel and to speak for them. It will vex you very much to know that the French revoiution has produced remarkably be- neficial consequences to the country. It is now acknowledged, and even proclaimed, by our bulwark newspapers, that France has greatly improved in agriatliurej during what is called her state of disorganisation f though we were told by these same newspapers, and by our insipid hireling Mr. Walsh, that Na- poleon had left none but old men, women and children, to cul- tivate the land. These poor, feeble creatures have got the land into such a fine state, that we are compelled to resort to a law to protect our farmers against their corn, in which article they under- sell us in our own markets. The truth is that, in addition to this great improvement in the state of France, the bulwark war has left us a load of ta:Kes, which the land cannot pay without h^h prices. The petitions, which have been presented in favour of this law, tell us, or, rather, tell the parliament, that our farmers cannot sell so cheap as those who pay no tytheSf poor-rates, and, comparatively, very little in tttxes of any sort. What is this but attacking tythes, one of the most ancient and venerable institu- tions in the whole world ! and these are bulwark men, too, who pe- tition in these term»! In France they have not been able to restore tythes ; or, in your language, to deliver the country from the want of tythes. They have not been able to restore the gabelies, the corv^es, the feudal courts, laws and rights, nor have they yet seen a monk in France since the days of Brissot. They have put up the Bourbons ; but they have not put down the code Napoleon. At the same time 1 am reminded of an occurrence that- will give you both pleasure and pain : I mean the attempt to assassi- nate Napoleon by the hand of some hired villain. It will give you, pleasure that a villain has been found to attempt the deed, and pain to know that it has not succeeded. Your manifesto has exci- ted a great deal of anger ir ouv bulwark newspapers, one of which observes, that it was " hoped and expected, that the Hartford de- legates would have declared a separation of the union at once." On the other hand, you are held in the utmost contempt. You had courage to menace, but not enough to strike. If any of you were, however, to do here what you have actually done in Ameri- ca ; that is, to endeavour to overawe the king and parliament, you would be hanged, have your bowels ripped out and flung in your faces ; have your bodies cut in quarters, and the quarters E laced at the king's disposal. ^How foolish that would make enriade men look ! Yours to command, WirXIAM COBBETT. ^-^^lotley, 22(1 Febr*Rry, 181 5. / < a lf-'.ri ^il& tellers of William Cobbetlt Esq. TO THE EABL OF LIVERPOOL-ON THE AMERICAN WAR. 3Iy Lordf Fhom the report of your speech on the eighth instant, it ap* pears very clearly that your lordship is, by the reporter, made to entertain an opinion that the divisions amongst the American people are already such that we may rationally hope, by a coa^ tini^atioti of the war, to produce a compliance with any candUionSy or an overthrow of the unions in which union alone consists the strength and prospect of future greatness in that rising and fast- growing republic. The words, as given in the report of your speech, were these : " He (the earl of Liverpool) had seen much stronger justifications of the conduct of our forces at Washington, which had been published in America, than any that had been published even tn this country. Not only were they net more hostile to U9, but the reverse was the case. In places, even where the British arms bad been successful, the people had shown themselves in our favour, and had seemed well disposed to put themselves under our protection." Your lordship is not singular in your opinion, if it be your opinion. It is the general opinion in this country. How that opinion had been created and kept alive^ I will not now inquire. The means made use of for this purpose, the ^'.moflt thinking people" know nothing af* They have opi- nions furnished them by others^ as regularly as soldiers or sailors are served with rations. The lower class are^from their poverty, wholly without the pale of information, true or false, and appear (o know and care as little about the acts of the government, and the state of public aiQfairs, as the earth, or any other substance, on which they expend their time and their physical force. The middle class are so incessantly employed in pursuit of the means of keeping themselves from the horrors of pauperism, that they have no time for discussion or inquiry. Many persons, in this class of life, have asked me whether the Americans could speak English, . Few men in the higher ranks of life know any thing worth speak- ing of, with regard to the American republic, a nation nearly equal in population to Great Britain, and inhabited, as we now feel, by men full as enterprising and as brave as our'own soldiers and sailors. EveB the writers who have fanned the flame of this bloody war, know nothing at all about the real state of America ; for though they have no desire to promulgate truth ; though it is their tradtt to deceive and cheat the people ; they show by their statements that they are ignorant of facts, which, if they knew them, would make them able to deceive with less exposure to detection. This being the case, it is no wonder that the whole nation is in a state of Letters of William Cobbetlf Esq. 2,71 iqual » by ilors. warr lough tradi meats , . ould A.) This 'J ateof-Tf error, as to this matter of primary importance. On the day wheo the news reached the country, relative to the capture of the city of Washington, 1 happened to call, on my way homewards from Sussex, at the house of a gentleman, who was as likely to be as well informed as any other gentleman in the country, as to this or any other political mattter. The following was the dialogue, wherein I shall exhibit the gentleman and his good wife under the name of Friend : Mrs. Friend. Well, Mr. Cobbett, we shall soon get rid of the income tax [for so it is called in the country] now. Mr. Cobbett. Shall we, madam ? I am very glad to hear it. It will enable me to get a better horse for my gig. [She had just been laughing at my scurvy equipage.} But, why noWf madam? What has happened to excite such a cheering hope ? Mrs. Friend, Why, have you not heard the news ? Mt. Cobbett. No. Mr. Friend, We have taken the capital of America. Mrs. Friend. And (be cowardly dogs, to the amouut of 9,000 men, ran away before 1,500 of our soldiers. Mr. Friend. President, and all, ran away ! Nobody knows where they went to, and the people were ready to submit to us all over the country. Mrs. Friend. Cowardly dogs ! Not stand to fight a moment for their capital. They are a pretty nation to go to war with England ! Mr. Friend. They ran away like a gteat .flock of South- down sheep before a pack of hounds. Mrs. Friend. The cowardly creatures will never dare show their faces again. What can you say for these Americans noio? Mr. Cobbett. Why, I say that you appear to know no more about them than about the people said to be in the moon. Let me look at the paper. [It lay before her on tli£ table.] Mrs. Friend. No : we must tell it you. It is too long for you to sit and read to yourself. Mr. Cobbett. Well, now mind, I tell you that, instead of put* ting an end to the * "r, this event will tend to prolong it; and mind, I tell you, thai unless we give up what we contend for, the war will be of many years* duration, and will be as expensive, and more bloody, than the war in Europe has been. Mr. Friend. WE give up to such Cowards as the Americans ! Mr. Cobbett. I do not mean to give up either territory or ho- nour. 1 mean, give up the point in dispute ; or, rather, our pre- sent apparent object. The Americans, like other people, cannot meet disciplined armies until they have time to organize and disci- pline themselves. But the Americans are not cowards, madam. Their seamen have proved that; and, what I fear is, that a con- tinuance of the war will make the proof cIcareT and clearer every ■,'^'^ t.v- ■u 278 i».^ '1 LetUra of William CobbeH, Msq. Mr. Friend. Mr. Co&be<^ Mr. Friend. Mr. Cobbett. day, by land as well as by sea ; and, I am now more than evei' afraid of a long continuaCion of the war ; because, if such people •B you seriously think that we are able to conquer America, I can have no reason to hope that any part of the nation remains undeceived. But, do you not think that the states mill divide ? Certainly not. No! No. And I should be glad to know what are your reasons for believing that they will divide. If you will give me any reasons for your belief, I will give you mine for a con* trary belief. Do t/ou think, madam, that the people of America are weary of living for thirty years without an income tax ? Mr. Friend. I have no reasens of my own about the matter. We see, in all our papers, that the Americans are a very divided people. They say that they cannot long hold together. Mr. Cobbett. And do you really believe what these corrupted vagabonds put into their columns ? You believed, then, of course, that " the American navy would be swept from the face of the ocean in a month ;" for set they told you. Yet, how different has been the events ! No, no ; the Americans are not cowards, madam. Mrs. Friend, Have you had such heapb of lemons this year as you used to have ? Such was, as nearly as I can recollect, the dialogue on this occasion ; and, as I am sure that the war is continued in the hope, on the part of the nation, at least, of deriving success from a breaking up of the union in America, which, I am thoroughly persuaded, we shall not effect, or see take place, I will endea- vour to show that this, my persuasion, rests on good grounds : and, if I succeed in this endeavour, I shall not yet abandon the hope, to which my heart clings, of seeing peace speedily restored between the two countries, upon terms not injurious to the inte- rest or character of either. In turning back, now, to the reported speech of your lordship, I perceive, and I perceive it with regret, that you are, by the reporter, made to found your opinion of the American disaffection to (heir government, and of their attachment to our king, in part, upon their having treated our officers, prisoners of war, with great liberality and kindness. I noticed this in my last number. I challenged any one to show the instance in which they had ever behaved cruelly to prisoners of war. I cited the memorable case of Mr. (now Sir Charles) Asgyll, and I appealed to their uniform conduct, during the present war, including the instances of Com- modores Bainbridge and Perry. But as the conduct of the former, in this respect, has been moat basely slandered in aqme / « ■.--:(... Lettera of WUliam Cobhettt Esq, 379 of our public prints, 1 will be aomewhat more particular as to both iastances, adding that of captain Lawrence. Commodore Bainbridge captured tbe Java, off St. Salvadore, on the 29(h of December, 1812. Hii frigate, the Constitution, car< ried 44 guns, and ours 49 guns, according to the American ac- counts. Ours, he says, had upwards of 400 men on traard. The republicans killed 60 and wbiinded 170 of our officers and men, and had themselves 9 killed and 25 wounded. After the battle, at their pressing request, Commodore Bainbridge paroled them all. The Java had on board Lieutenant-General Hislop and his staflf, together with several supernumerary officers and men. The fol- lowing letter of General Hislop to Commodore Bainbridge will beat speak for the latter : " Dear Sir, " I am justly penetrated with the fullest sense of your very handsome and kind treatment, ever since the fate of war placed me in your power, and I beg once more to renew to you my sincereat acknowledgments for the same. Your acquiescence with my request in granting me my parole, with the officers of my staff, added to the obligation I had previously experienced, claims from me this additional tribute of my thanks. May I now finally flatter myself, that, in the further extension of your generous and humane feelings in the alleviation of the misfortunes of war, you will have the goodness to fulfil the only wish and request I am now most anxious to see completed, by enlarging, on their parole, (on the same conditions you have acceded to with respect to myself,) all the officers of the Java still on board your ship ; a favour I never shall cease duly to appreciate by your acquies- cence thereto. **I have the honour to subscribe myself, dear sir, your much obliged and very obedient servant." The request was instantly complied with. Men and all were released upon parole. In the case of Commodore Perry, the battle was fought on Lake Erie, on the 10th of September, 1813. With vessels car- rying, altogether, 54 guns, he not only defeated, but captured, the whole of our fleet, six vessels, carrying 65 guns, as he stated in his official report ; which report, by the by, fully justifies our admiralty as to Lake Erie. I take the following paragraph from his report to his government upon this occasion : " I also beg your instructions Respecting tbe wounded. I am satisfied, sir, that wliatever steps I might take, governed by hu- manity, would meet your approbation. Under this impreasioDj, I have taken upon myself to promise Captain Barclay, who is very dangerously wounded, that he shall be landed as near Lake On- tario as possible ; and I had no doubt you would allow me to pa- roje him. He is under the impression that nothing but leaving i^ -'t i ■ .. v^. i \> IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) LO I.I 1.25 li^lllM IIIII25 'r itt |||||22 :: I4£ 12.0 1.4 1.8 !.6 V} ^ ^> w 7 c': cr] '/ v^ >^ op Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 872-4503 4is f/j .i.- Jjfpfrs qf fmiameMfll, Esq. t)xnjMTt o( .the coantrj will gave his \\k. There are aIio a nuoiMr of Canadians atbong the prisoners, imm mho have far' ' Captain fja#r(ince, in ih6 brig Hornet, attacked and sun^ in tiffi^en minutes, out' [brig, the Feacock, killing betw^n thirty ahd fbrt^ of our mi^nj while the Hornet had dnij one man kiUed, and f wo wduhded. Thus says the Ame^riV^n report. Ours I hkyd not lit hdhd. Then comes the following letter : Sivt •< N«w.T|irk, srtb MarfbKltUl We, the surviving officers of bis Britannic Majesty sbte bHg Peacoipk, beg leave to return you our grateful ac)uiq,«ltedg- nientft for iheteind cUtetUion and hospitaliiy we ^xperijepced during the ^me we remained on board the. UoUed, Sta^i^'s stppp Horttet. So much was done to alleviate the distresoing and un- ctt^fdir^ble situation in wliich we were placed, wnen ri^ceived on boardtthe ^lobp you command, that we cannot better express our feelitt|i ]than1>y aay^^^^ to qonMd&r ourselves pri8((n- ^s'i** and'ei^e^y' ming that friendship coiild dictate wias ^clopted b^ you, and the officers qf the Hornet, ti remedy th,e ipconve- liiiej^ce i^e would otherwise have experienced from th^ unavoidable i^is of the whole of our property and clothes, by the sffitden sink- ing tyt the Peacock. Permit us then, sir, impressed, as ve acf, with a grateful sense of your kindness, for ourselves and the other officiers and ship's company, to return you and the officers of the fiiornet ouf Sincere thanks, which .we shall feel obliged if you will colttmunicate to them in our name;, and believe us to remain, aitti tk hl^ sense of the kmd offices you have rendered us, your humble servants, **F. A. Wright, First Lieutenant. *' C. Lambert, Second Lieutenant. ** Edward Lo», Master. " J. Whittaker, Surgeon. " F. Donnithrbne iJnmin, Purser. ^ James LtWMne*, Eiq. wmmander U. S. sloop Hornet" The American papers added, upon this occasion, ihe follow- '* It is a fact worthy of note, and m the highest degree honour- able to our brave tars, that, on the day succeeding the desthic- tion of his Britannic majesty's brig Peacock, the qrew of the Hornet made a s»bscription, and supplied the prisoners (who had lost almost every thing) with two shirts, a blue jacket and trow- seirs each." Now, my lord, without going into more particulars, let me ask yoii, whether you think that this conduct towards our officers was the ^ect of disaflfection towards their own government, of disap- probation of its codduct, of a hatred of the war, and of <* a dispo' tdim of n^illiam Cobbettf Esq, t8t /,<#•'■ imfe- foliow- itlion to put themselves under our protection ?** And* ifjou answer in the negative, as you must, I suppose, why do you tbinic that the humane treatment of our officers elsewti^re indi- cates such a disposition ? Does your lordship see no poitible danger in drawing such an inference ? Do you thinic that it is wholly out of all belief, that your being reported to have drawn such an inference may render the treatment of our officeri» pri- soners of war, less humane and kind in future f Seeing that a disposition in an American citizen to put himself nnder the pro- tection of our king is a disposition to commit treiuon, in the eye of the laws of his country, would it be so very surprising if, in future, the Americans should be very cautious how tney exposed themselves to the merit of such a compliment? I must, however, do your lordship the justice to observe here, that what the pro- prietors of our newspapers have published as your speech, might never have been uttered by you. I would fain hope that they have, in this case, put forth, under your name, the suggestions of their own minds. I, therefore, comment oo the thing as theirs, and not as yours* In order to show that there is no foundation for the hope, en- tertained by people here, and so often expressed by our news- Eapers, of dividing the republic of America, I must go into a istory of the parties which exist in that republic ; give an ac- count of their origin and progress, and describe their present- temper and relative force. The population is divided into two parties; the republicans and the fedbralists. The latter also claim the title of republicans, but it is, and I think we shall find, with justice, denied to them by the former. These two parties have, in fact, existed ever since the close of the revolutionary war, though their animosities have never ap- peared to be so great, nor to threaten such serious consequences as since the commencement of the French revolution, especially since the Grst presidency of Mr. Jefferson, whose exaltation to the chair was the proof of decided triumph on the part of the re- publicans, and plunged their opponents into a state of despera- tion. Thefederalisls took their name from the general government, which, hemgfederat :>e, was called/ed!era2. Some of the people, as well as some of the members of the convention who formed the constitution, were for the new general government, and some were against it. Those who were against it, and who were for a government of a still more democratkal form, were called at first, antiifederal^ts ; but, of late, they have been called republicans, in opposition to the federalists, who were for a government of an aristocratical, if not of nearly a kingly form, and who proposed, in the convention, a president and senate /or life. There was at this time a great struggle between the parties^— the opposition 36 i 'I f lil III l-e m hUUrB of William Oo&M^ Esq. af the republicans spoiled the projects of the federalists^ rinil the government was at last, of a form and nature, which was wholly pleasing to neither, but did not, on the other hand, greatlj displease either. The federalists, however, took the whole credit to themselves of having formed the government ; and as General Washington ^ who had been president of the convention, and was decidedly for a federative general government, was elected the president under the new constitution, the federalists at once assumed that they were the only persons who had any right or title to have any thing to do with that gorvernment, treating their opponents as per* sons necessarily hostile tOt &nd, of course, unfit to be entrusted with, the carrying on of the federal governments When the tirst congress met^ under the new constitutionf it was clear that the federalists endeavoured to do by degrees, that which they bad mdt been able to at^complish all at once in the convention. They proposed to address the president by the title of his serene •highness, and to introduce other forms and trappings of royalty, or, at least, of a high aristocracy. Their intention was defeated, to theit* inexpressible mortification. The people were shocked at these attempts ; and from that moment the opposite party s^em to have gained ground in the confidence of the people, who ab- horred the idea of any thing that bore a resemblance to kingly government, or that seemed to make the slightest approach to- wards hereditary or family rule. When the French revolution broke out : when that great nation declared itself a republic, and went even further than America had gone in the road of democracy, the two parties took their different sides. Heats and animosities were revived. While Oeneral Washington remained president, however, he acted with ao much cautioii and moderation, that it was difficult for any one openly to censure him. He was blamed by both parties. One wished him to take part with France, the other with England. He did neither, and^ upon the whole, he left no party any good reason to complain of him. But when Mr. Adams, who was a native of Massachusetts, ivhere the federal party was in great force, became president, he certainly did, yielding to the coun- sels of weak and violent men, push things very nearly to an offen- sive and defensive alliance with us. The violent and unjust pro- ceedings of the French government furnished a pretekt for rais- ing an army, which was, for some time, kept on foot in time of peace, in the very teeth of the constitution. A sedition hill was passed, with power of sending aliens out of the country; and many other things were done, in the heat of the moment, which Mr. Adams, had he not been surrounded by the Massachusetts f'^deralists, never would have thought of, being a republican at heart, and a real friend to the liberties of his country. Letters of William Cobbett, Esq. 283 Mr. Adams*fl presidency ended in March, 180!. He was proposed to be re-elected ; but he lost his election, and the chmce fell upon Mr. Jefferson, who had alwajs been deemed the head of the republican partj. The truth is, that the people were, re- . publicans. Evtry thing bad been tried ; threats, aiartns, religion, all sorts of sch«3uies ; but they took alarm at nothing but the at- tempts upon their liberty, and they hurled down the parly who had mQ**e those attempts. Since that time, the government has been in the bands of the republicans. Mr. Jefferson was presw*. dent for eight years, Mr> Madison for four years, and is now going on for the second four years. Your lordship knows, as well as any man upon earth, how fond people are of plcKe and power ; and that no part of any opposi- tion is so bitter and troublesome as that part which consists of men whose ambitious hopes may have been blasted by their being turned out of place. It now happened, very naturally, but rathiM^. oddly, that the federalists became the opposition to the federal government; but they still retained, and do retain their tide; th&ughf really, they oiiglU to be called the aristocrats, OT royal- ists, ^ This opposition is now, however, chiefly confined to the stale of Massachusetts, the state government of which has even talk-, td about separating from the union. Your lordship has heard of a Mr. Henry, who was, it seems, in close consultation and cor- respondence with the oersons holding the reins of government in. Massachusetts upon the subject of separation, and who pretend- ed that he was employed by sir James Craig, governor of Canada, for that purpose. Your lordship, I believe, disclaimed him and his intrigues, and, therefore, I must believe, of course, that he was not employed by our governor But the people of America have been led to believe that there must have been something in his story*. This state of Massachusetts contains a great number of :nen of talents; many rich men, become so chiefly by the purchasing, at a very low rate, of the certificates of soldiers w/;'* "srved in the late war,* and by procuring acts of cong-ress to cause the sums to be paid in full, which, indeed, was thought, and openly said, to be their main object in pressing for a federal government with large powers. I'hese men, now disappointed in all their ambi- tious hopes ; seeing no chance of becoming petty noblemen ; seeing the officers and power of the country pass into other, hands, without the smallest probability of their return to them- selves, unless they be content to abandon all their hi^ib notions of family distinction ; these men have become desperate ; and, if I am to judge from their proceedings, wojild plunge their country into a civil war, rather than yield quiet obedience to that very government which they had been so long in the practice of cen< • The revolutionary war. '« ,. '■-[ iiU^ l^fUira qf l^iUiam Cobbtitj Etqk BtsAng others for not su£Eiciently admiring. But, my 101*6, tbtfugh thtro it » majority of voices in Massacliuaetta on our iidk; for OR OCR RiDK THBV RBALLT AH£, there ii 8 thumpiDg minority on the other aide ; and what ia of great importance in the eati- mate» that minoritj conaiata of the nerves^ the bonea, and einewa of the population of the atate ; ao that the aum total of our ground of reliance, aa to a aeparation of the statea, ia the good will of the moat numerouB, but moat feeble and inefficient part of the people of the atate of Maaaachuaetta ; and even theae, I am fuljj per* Buaded, are by thia day, awed into silence by the determined at- titude of the reat of the country. The same charges, which our vile newapapera have been pre- ferring against Mr. Madiaon, have been preferred againat him by their serene h^hnfisses of Maaaachuaetta. They have accused him of a devotion to France; they have, in our newspaper style, called him the ** tool of Napoleon; they, too, have dared to assert that he made war upon ua, withoid the sligMest provQcatio»t for the purpose of aiding Napoleon in destroying England, *' the bulwark of their rel^^ion*' They have held public feasts and rejoicings at the entrance of the Cossacks into France, and at the restoration of the ancient order of things. You will bear in mind that theae people are staiich Presbyterians ; and it would amuse your lordship to read the orations, preachiti^Sf and prayers, of these people ; to witness their gratitude to Heaven for restoring the popt, whom they used to call the Scarlet Whore, the Whore of Babylon ; for the re-establishment of the Jesuits; and for the re-4>pening of the dungeons, the resharpening of the hooks, and the rekindling of the flames of the inquisUion, Their opponents, the republicans, say, we never were the friends of Napoleon, as a despot, nor even as an emperor ; we never approved of any of his acts of oppression, either in France or out of France; we always complained of bis acts of injustice towards ourselves; but he was less hurtful to our country than other powers ; and, as to mankind in general, though we regretted to see him with so much power, we feared that that power would be succeeded by some- thing worse; and we cannot now rejoice that the pope is restored, that the Jesuits are re-established, the inquisition re-invigorated ; that monkery is again overspreading the face of Europe i and that the very hope of freedom there seems to be about to tie extin* guished forever. And this, your lordship may be assured, ia the language of nineteeen-twentieths of the people of America. There are, it is to be observed, federalists in all the states, which you will easily believe, when you consider how natural it is ^or men, or at leaat, how prone men are, to wish to erect them- selves into superior classes. As soon as a man has got a great deal of money, be aims at aemething k)eyond that. He thirsts for distip(;tiQnB and titles. His oeiU object is to hand them down to Letkrs of William Cobbelt, Eiq. hnbmWy, It will require great vatchfolnesi and great retloln- tion in the Americanfl to defeat this propenaitj. You have not leisure for it, or it votild amuse you to trace the workings of this would-be iU)bility in America. They are very shame-faced about it ; but they let it peep out through the crannies of their hypocrisy* Being defeated, and totally put to the rout, in the open field, by the general good sense of the people, they have resorted te the moat contemptible devices for effecting, by degrees, that which they- were unable to carry at a push. They have established what they call ** Benevolent Societies** to which they have pre- fixed, by way of epithet, or characteristic^ the name of Washing- ton. The professed object of these societies, who have their pe* riodical orations,preachings,prayingSt mdioastings, was toaffbrd relief to any persons who might be in distress. The rkal ob- J EOT appears to have been to enlist idlers and needy person* under their political banners. These little coteries of hypocritei appear to have assembled, as it were, b;* it unanimous sentiment, or rather, by instinct, to celebrate the fall of Napoleon, and the restoration of the pope, the Jesuits, and the inquisition. But un« fortunately for this affiliation of hypocrites, they have little, or na nUiterials to work upon in America, where a man can earn a week'a subsistence m less time than he can go to apply for and obtain it without work ; and, accordingly, the affiliation seems destined ta share the fate of the serene highnesses proposition of twenty-five years ago. The fall of Napoleon, so far from weakening, will tend ta strengthen the general government in the hands of the republi-* cans. It has deprved its enemies of the grand topic of censure; the main ground of attack. The " Cossacks" as they are now sometimes called, of Massachusetts, can no longer charge the president wiih being the *< tool of Napoleon ;*' they no longer stand in need of England as " the bulwark of religion" seeing that they have the pope, the Jesuits, the Benedictines, the Franciscans, the Carthusians, the Dominicans, and, above all, ^^9 inquisitiorii to supply her place in the performance of that godly office. They will no longer, they can no longer, reproach the president for his attachment to France ; for France has now a kingi a legitimate sovereign^ who regularly bears mass. They are row, therefore, put in this dilemma: they must declare open* ly fo r England against their country ; or, by petty cavilling, must make their opposition contemptible. The former they dare not do ; and they are too full of spite not to do the latter. So that their doom, 1 imagine, is sealed ; and their fall will not be much lesB complete than that of Napoleon himself, with this great dififer- ence, however, that his name and the fame of his deeds will de- scend to the latest posterity, while the projects of ennobling them- selves, at the expense of their country's freedom and happiness, \ I n .-s m m LHiers of William Cohhdl, Esq. will be forgotten and forgiven before one half of them are eaten by worms. This is my view of the matter. Your lordship will probably think it erroneous; but, if it prove correct, how long and how bit- terly shall we have to deplore the existence of this bloody contest. I am, &c. William Cobbstt. DESPBRATE NAVAL ENGAGEMENTS. I OBSERVE it stated in the Halifax papers of the 2d instant, that the Prince of Neufcfaatel, an American armed brig, had arrived at Boston, after sustaining a gallant actbn of twenty minutes with five boats full of men belonging to our ship of war the Endymion. The account says, that one of our boats sunk during the engage- ment, " which had on board, at first, 43 men, of whom two only were saved ; and another, which had 36 men, was taken posses- sion of, after having 8 killed, and 20 wounded.*' The Endymion bsaid to have lost, in ali, 100 men killed, wounded, and prisoners ; among which, the first lieutenant and a master's mate were killed, and three lieutenants and two master's mates wounded. The Prince of Neufchatel had only "31 men at quarters, including officers, and 37 prisoners on board. Six of her men were killed, 15 severely wounded, 9 slightly, and 8 remained unhurt." It is true that nothing has been published here in an official shape respecting this naval disaster ; but this circumstance can no more invalidate the truth of the statement than the silence which has been kept up as to the fate of the Avon will lead us to doubt that that vessel was sunk bj her American opponent. The repulse and disaster attending the Endymion, is not, however, the only naval triumpL of the enemy which has been carefully concealed from the public eye. The following article appears in the Paris papers, received to the 22d instant : Extract of a letter from Mr. John B. Dabner, cQnnil for the United States of Acne- rica, dated Fayal, October 6. *' Our countrymen have had a brilliant affair. Despising the rights of nations, and violating neutral territory, three English vessels, the Plantagenet, the Rota, and the Carnation, attacked the brig General Armstrong, American privateer, of 14 guns, commanded by Captain Reid, at anchor in these roads. They succeeded, finally, in destroying her, but paid dearly for it, for they had 120 killed, and 90 of their best marines wounded, in- cluding the flower of their officers. Captain Reid, wit}) hin brave crew, consisting only of 90 men, had only seven slightly voundedf" LetUn of William CohbetU Etq, 987 ' About ten days ago I received the ?QUowiag letter from aa Bngliah genllemao at Fayal, which he transtnitted by a vesael bound for Lisboni giving (he full particulars of the above affair. It speaks volumes, and must reach conviction to the minds of those who are so far deluded to think, that it is in the power of tliis country to subdue a people who fight with so much undaunt- ed resolution as the Americans: iStV, Payal« October 15, tSl4. The American schooner privateer General Armstrong, of New York, Captain Samuel C. Reid^ uf 7 guns and 90 men, entered here on the 26th ultimo, about noon, 17 days from that place, for the purpose of obtaining water. The cjiplain, seeing nolhin^ on tfa head and stern, with four lines. The governor now sent a remon- strance to Van Lloyd, of the Plantagenet, against such pro- ceedings, and (rusted that the privateer would not be furthei* molested ; she being in the dominions of Portugal, and under the guns of the castle, was entitled to Portuguese protection. Van Lloyd's answer was, (bat he was determined to destroy the vessel, at the expense of all Fayal, and should any protection be given her by the fort, he would not leave a house standing in the vil- lage. All the inhabitants were gathered about the walls, expect- ing a renewal of the attack. At midnight, 14 launches were discovered to be coming in rotation for the purpose. When they got within clear, or gun-shot, a tremendous and effectual discharge was made from the privateer, which threwr the boats into confu- lyiVf. lifi "'mA 288 LeUera of miliam Cobbdt, Esq. II' ^;k •ion. Tbej now returned a spirited firo, but the privateer kept up 10 continual a discharge, it was almost impossible for the boats to make any progress. They finally succeeded, after immenie k)8s, to get alongside of her, and attempted to board at every quarter, cheered by the oflScers with a shout of " no quarter ! which we could distinctly hear, as well as their shrieks and crief. The termination was near about a total massacre. Three of th« boats were sunk, and but one poor solitary officer escaped death in a boat that contained fifty souls ; he was wounded. The Americans fought with great firmness, but more like blood- thirsty savages than any thing else. They rushed into the boats, sword in hand, and put every soul to death as far as came within their power. Some of the boats were left without a single man to row them { others with three and four. The most that any one returned with was about ten. Several boats floated on shore full of dead bodies. With great reluctance I state, they were manned with picked men, and commanded by the first, second, third, and fourth lieutenants of the Plantagenet; first, second, third, and fourth ditto of the frigate, and the first officers of the brig ; toge- ther with a great number of midshipmen. Our whole force ex- ceeded 400 men. But three officers escaped, two of whom are wounded. This bloody and unfortunate contest lasted about fortj minutes. After the boats gave out, nothing more was attempted till daylight the next morning, when the Carnation hauled in along- side, and engaged her. The privateer still continued to make a most gallant defence. These veterans reminded me of Law- rence's dying words of the Chesapeake, " don't give up the ship." The Carnation lost one of her topmasts, and her yards were snot away ; she was much cut up in the rigging, and received several shot in her hull. This obliged her to haul off to repair, and to cease firing. The Americans now finding their principal gun, {Long Tom,) and several others, dismounted, deemed it folly to think of saving her against so superior a force ; they therefore cut away her masts to the deck, blew a hole through her bottom, took out their small arms, clothing, &c. and went on shore. I discovered only two shot-holes in the hull of the privateer, although much cut up in '■Sging* Two boats* crews were, soon after, despatched from «ur vessels, which went on board, took out some provisions, and set her on fire. For three days after, we were employed in buryi(ig the dead that washed on shore in the surf. The number of British killed exceeds 120, and 90 wounded. The enemy, to the surprise of mankind, lost only two killed, and seven wounded. We may well say—" God deliver us from our enemieSf if tfds is the may the Americans fight." Uhm qf miUm CohbeH, £^. 289 •kept boats mente every rter r [ crief* of the 1 death ! blood- e boats, within man to uay one lore full manned lird, and ird, and g; togc- brce ex- rhom are »out forty ttempted in along* make a of Law- Le ship." ere snot several , and to kg Tom,) [of saving ler masts leir small only two :ut up in Jied from [ions, and the dead lish killed jrpriae of 7e may b the viay ^tAttarbaMrtnc the pritateeT) VanXloyd mitde a denuufd tP tKf ipNMw to denyer up the Avericabf ai fait Driaoiion, wlyich iBo Wenac reftnedi m threkfeoM 16 lend 5oO mefn on sbore» ana it iheni'by foitt. *S\m Ameflcaqi inln^edMy reliMtli wlw i^trttife, to all did Oofbhi Convent, knoeked awpy the a^i'^bi- (|rKi|bridge, and determined* to mend themielVet to thelM^ k^Y*n» howeVeri tbbuglit better th«n to send his meqi. . p* ril dMi^uidedtwo oaen, whteh, he said, deiefted fronhia toim^I ^heninAinSilca. Tb« goverttor sent lipr the men, but fQuml nota^ of the dtocHptioh Idi^ei Many booiei teeeited miieh injart bn i/hdre from Uie gam of Ib^OarMtidit. A iToman, slttibg in the fodrth stbry of htt houilc^ M her thii^ shot off, slid t toy had hli arm brdkenl ^ ^ . ' The AmtfHcaii consul M^ hM ma^e a demand ontl^e Foi^ l^ese govemmeQt for a hutfdied thousand doHfrir (bf tlie |mvaf ecj whlth odr eoasult Mr. Pirkin, thi&b, hi jiistice; wAl be paid., and thit thcTf will claim on IfinglM^. Mr.Yarklo^ M^. Edward Binric^, andbtlier iSnelish genSem^D, duajbpi'bii^e bt the pu|[rager iM dopredation commftted by ooc ressels oii ^!s occasion. Too ▼easel that wii despatched to I)d||$ladd t^l|ti i}k Wbundeit wa| x^ permitted fo take a sfaigle letter mm^ p#^ )^e^>ii. 'Being aq ejf^* wHoess to this tnmsac^n, t haVe givetar yon a correct stateinent as it occurred. With respect, I am, &c. H. K. F. William. Cohhtit, Esq* to TH& EARL dF LlVEBPOOi>-ON THIS AMEBIC /kK WaII. , Myljordf Iir the American newspapers I b«ive seen ao. article entitled ** Briiiah Bbtherationt^ in r^hich article are noticed^ in a ^nst ludicrous, but most provoking manner, all the wise obseryaUowi made in England as to the cause of our ships beings tteatea by thbie of America. At the close of the article, the i^ter stales il^at he're|tardB as the rtal cause ; but which statement I will, for my heaUh*8 sake, refrain from repeatiiu; to yow locdriiip. But if this saucy republican gave the tith of botiipnUion to our fonber ptisadhi^ upon this head, what will he say' now, when the question b become ten thousand times more embroiled t|ia|i tiert ,^- Hie speeches attributed to the opposHiont upon tl|i3,iAbjei^t, present matter worthy of public observation. Mr. Hobneh lays the blame of the failure on the lakes Erie and Champlain ; nc 3r h V 0[krs'of Iftimni Cdbhlt, ICi^' mi M BifrilHiies thofee oieniorable TtctoriM of the Aowricant fb (8e milii»hy* n« comptaint Ibat ytu and >otir colleaeitei httt tour naval coiifimaiiders Id cooterid whh a vastsumridntifofjbnt^ xb« Amerkait- officiar accbunf, in bothcaaes, makeiiflie iii)ierior>- My o^ th0 force on tmr tide j and, a» to Z<«X;|^ ClkampMfH, BIr O. Prevoat, biijasetf, gives u« a i\iperiw\ty of fipfrim guni. T am, fdr my parti; ^i^^^^ f^ diiksover the poHcj of aicribintt t^tty ^ |race to the iniiMfll^hi, and every eoccuis (o the eooimandm. Of Its flagrant JmUitice tbere can ftenodoilbt; and ft «p|leara to uie that its, folly is not much more qUeatibfiiabl^. WeIlM2fort #aB Biftde a duke for bia iuccdifi ; but, afccordfng t6 the pretlent Wajf of thinking, or of talking th<> aeeretarv of th^ wai- dibpartlh^Vit should have been m&^e a duke', dnd' WeHini^n'ri^atried wlraf Ae was ; and the lo^ds pf (be' admihiltj^ ahonlU Imvfr kkd atl tb^ tU bands, starVj,' and titles that bhi^e' beenf beito#ed 6M htfVal cooiBtan- ^ers. i£ to tibb'cplDmandera belong (be ^raiseil' of ' vidtorlfes ; to (iiem also belbng, opoQ the face o( the iMtttri tbe'blftme lif defeat. " , - '' ' ' ^ -[';'[ ;' ' "^ Much reliance appejfH to be |>[acedy6y (ftie 6p^\ikiiifpn HHe ^jlfcumstance of Captara Barclay having b\^en hbnourably acquit- ted by a court martial. For, say they, if he Was provided 'With a fofoe equal *o thnt of the Americans, he miist have tween ^ffty ; and, if he was not, the ministers are to blame. j.i^y' tal^ 'this aent,«nce of the court martial, therefore, as a proof of the guilt Of Aii^iater»k But is it not very evident that this conclusion is fiflse ? Captain Barclay might be as brave a man as ever exii^ted ; he might have acted with wisdom equal to his bravery; he might have had a superiority of guns and men ; he might have been de- feated ; yet he might be perfectly free from any blame ; and might, on the contraryi^i^rit honours and rewards; still the admiralty might deietve no censttre whatever. The American^ ddght have abler spameu ; they might, from their superior bodily strength and agility, be able to fire quicker than we; they might fight with an ii^ard-of degree of resolution and eagemeilaf they mkht be anunatedi with feelings tinknown to theitosoma of thehr advei^a* i^jS . ,What ! is it to become a maxim, that whenever one of our commanderv is defeated,, there must be a crtme ^her \t him or in tWattiuatry? Must be be puiyshed, or they condemnisd ? Must h^ be their accuser, or they be his accusers ? This would soon in* troduce a ve^y amicable sort of connexion between the comman-^ 4fi:s and the ministry. . f^jThe tru|h is, my lord, that tbere is a degree of mortification^r anu^of. ibamf^r attached to tbesd naval victories of the Americans, th^t drive!* men, and particularly naval men, who have all the mass of the peo^ with them, to all sorts of follies and inconsistencies. They do not know what to say or to do, hi order to get rid of this insupportable mortification. Sometimes Jobnny BaU says to Jo> Mere of WUHoM Cohbett, Eiq, Ml mlluait ** you have got some EiOglish uilort in fom tlUns.*'— ** Majt be 8p," nyt Jooathaa, '* but you btve got all BngHih lailori in your Bbipi." — '* Aye,** replies Jobn, *' bot yoa hiive Sot tbe best of our uilora."~^< May be lo/* lays Joaatban, ** but, ben, how cooM tbe but of your aailon to deaert from your Mr- vice, toxome into mine ?'*-^*' No, no I" rejoina John, haitily, *< I don't mean the best nun ; I mean that (hey fight more itsperateltf Aan thoae we have en board, because the rascals know that if they •re taken (hey will be hmged."—^' Oh ifie ! Johnny,** rejoins Jun»tha% <^ ido you think that Englishmen will fight better from a dread of the gallows than from a Jove of their king and their ^orious constitution!" *< No,*' says John, "/ said no such a tbiogt You have got heanier shoU and sfronger pomdery and moregunSf and more men."— i<' Indeed, Johnny," says Jonathan, '* why* I am sure you pa^enough for your Bhi|js, shot, guns, men, and powder.^ Your navy and ordnance, last year, cost you 9fi auUiqop Bterllog, which is more than tmenty times as much as ours is to cost us nexfvear, though we are building fieets and form- \^ dock-yards, beside defending, lakes and all, three thouiafld DUlesof sea coast"——" Well," says John, ready to burst with anger, ** what is that to you, what I pay ? I will pay it, if I like lo pay f'*-^" Oh dear!" says Jonathan, "don't be an^y, odd friitnd. I have not the least objection to your paying ; only, / hope I shall not hear any more of your grumbling about the prO' ptrly. tax.** — ^' You are a saucy scoundrel," says John, foaming with rage ; " you deserve a good drubbing, you Yankee dog, and you will get U ^e/— and, at any rate, if / pav taxes, I'll make you pay taxes too. If I am miserable myself, I'll make you oubappy if I can." It is to this mortification, my lord, that you have to ascribe the attacks of the newspapers on the naval administration, which jreally appears to me to have done more in Canada than could have been expected at their hands. You see that the opposition here are supported by the country, who will blame you, blame Sir George , JPrevost, blame our powder, shot, ships, gun locks ; blame any person or thing; blame and execrate all the world, father than acknowledge that the republicans are, gun to gun, and man to man, our masters upon ilu sea. Far be it from me to cen- sure a reluctance to come to such an acknowled!;ment. This re- luctance arises from a love of one of the best professions of one's country : namely, its fame in deeds of arms. But, theit, it is ma- nifeat, that this patriotic feeling, if not subjected to reason and enlightened views, may be productive of great injustice towards commanders, or ministers, or both ; and may expose the nation to great and lasting misery. Tbe opposifion are feeding this feel- ing. They ascribe every failure to you and your colleagues ', and 4hey jitjii^usly keep out of sijght Ihe r^al cause of those failures. m 'm LeUera qf WUliam Cohbett, Eiq* Tliey jiMtify the war on our part; they fan the flame; (heytxeit* falie hopes of future luccera; they aay to the people, wehav«r< failed hitherto from the feult of the ministry ; and, thereby, they icause it to be believed, that better may be done for the future, ivithout any radical change in our political and naval lyitema ; and In doing ro, they do, in my opinion, as great an injury a» they eaa, pansibly do to the countiy. '''^"^ Next to the ministry comes Sir Oeorge Prevost Mr. If oraev; did not kqpv which was to blame, the ministry or the coloiiial governor. The fleet had been beat and captured, and M^ Hor- uer was sure that it must have been owmg to something otker'tban the fleet itself^ or, at- least, its commanders. It never coidd t>e ikeir fault. Men who fought two hours and twenty minutes within a few yards of the mouths of the opposing cannon, and whose vesr* sels had not « mast or any thing standing td which a sail could be fastened, Sucb men could not be in the^u2/. They fought) most bravely. They were overpowered, liiey lost their fleet} but ungrateful is the country, and base the man, who insinuates that they ought to have done more. They could do no more. If thty had continued to fight, they must have been all blown to pieces, without the power of resistance. No ; it iTas not the fault of the officers of our fleet ; it was the fault of the Ymnkees, for being so strong in body, so agile, so dexterous, and so determined. ' Mr. Horner should have made a motion against them. Suppose he were, next time, to make a motion for proseeuiit^ them ? If we could get at them in that way, it would soon benumb theit faculties. .. :ii.&i. t.n ..^'v -'«-• • •««> u.^J>t: it> v «> << Aye," say the people about Portsmouth and Oonport, ^ it is time an inquiry was made ! It is a shame that Sir Oeoige PrO" vest is not brought home and ptmished.** 1 am assure your lord' ship, that this is their language; and they will be quite outrageous when they find that he is not to be punished ; but, on the con> trary, is i^ remain where he is. There is no one hereabouts who does not think that Sir James Yen's letter to the lords of the ad- miralty is ^finisher for Sir Qeorge. To such a pitch of folly has the nation been pushed by their notions of the invincibility of the navy, that a captain in that service is looked upon as the absolute arbiter of the fate of a lieutenant general of the army, and the governor of a province, under whose command he is 8ervi^> Sensilile men were disgusted at the arrdgance of Sir James Yeo's tetter ; but it was well suited to the capacities and tastes of those who sing, or listen to Dibdin^s nauseous trash about the fleet and the sailors. Upon the heads of those who demand these inquiries and ex- poswesy be the consequences. These consequences will be, clear proof, that our naval officers had a suf^ciency of force upon (jolh the occaaioQB alluded to, and that they were to blame, if my Ldtm of William Cohhettf Etq. M^ ixeit* hav« ,they utura* ; and if OB lorner (gonial '. Hor- er than ieihtir ritbina »■« vaar- Duld be ;htinoat tct} but tea that IfthtjF ) pieceBf It Off the beii^ ao d. Mr. DDOse lie BIU? U mb thcaf lort, « it irgePre- ^our lord' itragcous Itbe con- »uta who the ad- folly has tility of m as the le army, \nd he is, •e of Sip [ities and lb about and ex- witl be, }rce upon \tfif(^ny body If na, for their defeats. Sir George Prevoat will neve^ anffer hiiiuelf to be regarded as the cause of these calaniities and dis- graces; and I am very sure that the ministry, having the power, will not neglect the means of justifying themselves. So that all this, stir will only tend to make the mortification of the navy greater than it now is ; the prejudice* of the nation wiU only re- ceive the greater shock ; and the world will only have completer' proof of those very facta which we are so anxmus to disguise or diafigikee* I, (. T... i-.t-u.i: < !.(■■;■ ., . ivi ■*» . ,; It was dbscrved) during, the debate; that though our ships of war were quite auffici«ntly provided with the means of '< combat- ifif^^wa ordinary foe, they ought to have been fitted out in an extraordinary way to combat such a foe as the Americana !"' But suppose the admiralty not to have fitted them out In this extraordinary way ? Were they to blame for that? Was there a man hi the country who did not de«pise the American navy f Wes there a public writer beside myself, who did not doom that oavy to destruction in a mantfi? Did not all parties exceedingly relish the description, given in a very august assembly, of ** half a dozen of ^r frigates, with bite of etriped bunting at their mast- heads V* Did not the Ouerriere sail up and down the American coast, with her name written on her flag, challenging those fir fri- gates? Did not the whole nation, with one voice, exclaim at the s^ir of the LUtle BeU^ " only I(^t Rodobrs come within reach of one of out frigates ?** If, then, such was the opinion of the whole nation, of all men, of all parties; with what justice is the board of admiralty blamed for not thinking otherwise; for not sending out the means of combating an extraordinary sort of foe ; for not issuing a privilege to our frigates to run away from one of those fir-built thmgs with a bit of striped bun/ing* at its masthead? v.t n!#'.»fAs»! f5.-;«stv..:.*ji^mixi-(B ."yjir hin^an v. It has always been the misfortune of Ertglaiid that her rulers and her people have spoken, and have thought contemptuously of the Americana. Your Iwdship and I were boys, and, indeed, pot bom, or at least, I was not, when our king first was involved in a quarrel with the Americans. But almost as long as I can re- member any thing, I can remember that this contempt was ex- pressed in the songs and sayings of the clod hoppers amongst whom 1 was born and ured ; in doing which we conducted down to the earth that we delved, the sentiments of the 'squires and lords. The result of the former war, while it enlightened no- body, added to the vindictiveness of hundreds of thousands ; so that we have entered into this war with all our old stock of con* tempt, and a vastly increased stock of rancour. To think that the American republic is to be a great pofver, is insupportable. Some men, in order to keep her down, in their language, and at the same time, not use harsh expressions, observe, Aat she is opiy ■ > 294 JUttm ^ fl^Uliim €!obbett, 1%. ttHOther part 0/ wrailvts^ They wish ber to be thought, if Bat depeodept up«n us, still to he a mrt of younger child of cur f»* tuuyf coming in after Inland^ Jamaica,^c. I met a very worthf Scots gentleman, a month or two ago, who wished that loniie man of ability, would pvoposea scheme that he had, and without which, he said, wt nevfr should have peace again. " Well, sir," said I, « and ^ray what u your scheme ?" " Why," said he, '' it it very sm^le. It is to form a UNION with the Amsricaiw ■tates.'' It was raining, and I wanted to get on; so that I bad not time to ascertain what soH of union he meant. This gentle* man, however, was remarkably moderate in his views. The far grea^ter part of the nation expect absolute colonial submissiont; and if our fleets and armies should not finally succeed in bringing a property tax firom America into bis majesty's exchetpier, the far greater part of the people will be most grievously disappointed* So that this eotUtmpt of tbe Yankees has given your lordship and your colleagues a good deal to do, in order to satisfy the hopes and expectations which have been «xcited, and which, I assure you, are confidently entertained. >/ . Of the effects 0f this contempt I know nobody, however, who have so much reason to repent as the officers of his majesty's navy. If they had triumphed, it would only have been over half a dozen of fir frigates, with bits of bunting at their maat^s heads. They were sure to gain no reputation in the contest; and, if they were defeated, what was their lot ? The worst of it is, they them- selves did, in some measure, contribute to their own ill fate ; for, of all men living, none spoke of " poor Jonathan" with so much Contempt. To read their letters, or the letters which our news- paper people pretended to have received from them at the outset of the war, one would have thought that they would hardly have condescended to return a shot froi^ a btinting ship. And noiVt to see that bit of bunting flying so often over the British flag ! Oh ! it is stinging beyond expression. The people in the coun* try cannot think how it is. There are some people who are for taking the American commodores at their word, and ascribing their victories to the immediate intervention of Providence. Both Perry and M'Donough begin their despatches by saying, ** Al- mighty God has given us a victory." Some of their clergy, upon this ground alone, call them Christian heroes, and compare them to Joshua, who, by the by, was a Jew. I observe, that when any of them got beaten, they say nothing about supernatural agency ; yet there is still a vUtory on one side or tbe other ; and if they ascribe ikeir victories to such agency, why not ascribe our victories, and of course their own defeats, to this same over* ruling cause ? If Mr. Madison had told tbe congress, that " Al* mighty Ood had been pleased to enable the enemy to bnrn their Capitol,** how they would have stared at bim ? Yet, sorely, he Letters bf WtUUtm tfobhdl, JSsq, mi much jr news- outset have lid noWf flag! le coun* are for iscribing Botb "Al- ly, upoo ire tbem irhen smatural er ; and ascribe ne over* at « Al- rn their Iv. he ttiight faavie iaid that with ai much reason as Comnodore 'M*Do> nbugb ascribed his vietdry to auch interpositioii.- If Cotmnodortt Perrj, who captured oUr fleet on hike Erie, had been tmit i4 New-York with looks of perfect indifibreoce* instead ofbeiiic feasted and toasted as he was, and had been told that the cauaeoc tfait was, that he had gained no victorjT) even accordhig to hid own official account—how silly he would have looked I And jet Ive'cotild have no reason to complain. I perceive, tdiD, many other instances of thia aping propensity in the Americans. It it the ** hommrahle William Jones, Secretary of the Navy ;*' the ■< kotidnrabie the Mayor of New>York ;" *< his hwiour the Chief JuMlce;" and even the members of congress call one another "honourable gentlemen," and their ^ korwitrcble Mtndt.,'^ I wat licit, till of late, aware that this sickly tastd was become so preva- lent in America. This is^ indeed, contemptible ; and England Win have, in a few years, a much better ground of reliance fo^ success, in this change of national character in America! than in the force of our arms. When once the hankelring after titles be- comes general in that country; when once riches will havt produced that efibct, the country will become an easy prey to an old compact, and easily-wielded government like ours. When men find that they cannot obtain titles under the form of govern- ment now existing, they wil^ as soon as they havo the opportu- nity, sell the country itself to any sovereign who will gratify their base ambition. This is the slorv poison that is at work on thtt American constitution. It will proceed, unless speedily checked, to the utter destruction of that which it has assailed. Our best way is to make peace with them now, and leave this poison to work. By the time they get to " right konourables" we shall be ready to receive their allegiance. When the bit of bunting comes to be exchanged for some sort of armorial thing, the fel- lows, who now *' fight like blood thirsty savages," as our paper§ say, will become as tame and as timid as sheep. I am, &c. &c. William Gobbett. TO THE EARL OF UVEUPOOL-ON THE AMERICAN WAR. My Lordf The resolutions in the Common Council were moved by Mr. Waithman, who, in a very clear and strong manner, described the principle and practice of the property tax ; and Mr. Alder- man Wood gave a horrid instance of its operation. But it waa not till Mr. Alderman Heygate spoke that the right string waa touched. He said that the American nar waa the cause of the ;k.i,-'.-'I 296 Ldteiri of WUliam Cobbettf Esq. i^i tive measures are pursuing for detaching from the dominion of the enemy an important part of his territory. Accounts from Ber- muda to the nth ultimo inform us, that all the disposable shipping in that quarter have been sent oiF to the Mississippi. Sir Alexan- der Cochrane left Halifax at the latter end of October for the same destination ; and a large body of troops from Jamaica was ex- pected to assemble at the same point. The American government has openly manifested such extravagant views of aggrandizement, that our eyes ought to be opened to its measureless ambition ; and we ought to curb its excesses in time. It is, doubtless,- with a view to this just and necessary policy, tbat government has in- curred the expense of such extensive military and naval prepara- tions ; and it can hardly be supposed, that whilst they are so largely sacrificing the national resources with one hand, they will render the object of the sacrifice altogether null with the other. Nevertheless, policies that peace with America would be signed before the end of the current month, were yeiterday done in the Ldtert tf WilUam CohheUy Esq, «$9 ••tty 10 high M thirty guineas to retam one faiUMlred. It IKu even aNcrted, though without foundation, that the preliminaries had been ahead^ digested, and received the signatures of the com- OHisioaeFS on the 3d iostaet* We have, howevert 8om$ reeuon to belive that the speeulatioos on this subject are influenced^ in tome measure, by secret information, iasued, for the most uowof thy purposes, from the hotel af the American legation ateginning of (he new year, provided that no better terms can, ere then, be obtained. The Liverpool frigate is arrived at Ports- mouth, from the coast of America, as is his majesty's ship Pene- lope, from Halifax. By these conveyances various and contra- dictory intelligence has been received. On the one hand, it was ^reported that an armistice had taken place between the troops on both sides, in America: on the other, that General Drummond had defeated Brown and Izard with great loss, and forced them to blow up Fort Erie, and retire with the shattered remains of their forces to.Sackett's Harbour. The first of these reports is altogether unfounded ; the latter is, at least, premature. At the date of the last advices, Fort Erie continued in possession of the enemy; but General Drummond, having received additional rein- forcements, was expected soon to make an attack on the position. Commodore Chauncey*8 fleet was still blockaded in Sackett's Harbour by Sir James Yeo ; but it was not understood that any attack would be made on that place, by land or water, before the winter set in. Having mentioned our naval commander on Lake Ontario, it is but right to notice that be is to be succeeded in •command by Commodore Owen, as Sir George Prevost is, at the same time, to be by Sir George Murray. The comparatively small magnitude of our Lake squadrons, may, perhaps, atTord a reason (or at least an official argument) for not employing one of our first admirals on that service.; but why one of the first generals that we possess is not charged with the management of so ex- tremely important a land war, it is difficult to guess. The officer thus mentioned may, for aught we know, be a person of ability : certainly bis name, to those who remember Ferrol and Tarragona, cannot but be rather ominous ; but the nation at large is really indignant at the sort of apathy displayed on this occasion by ge- nerals of higher rank and celebxityj who oug^t not to have de- *1 ■ T^ 300 LeUert of William Cdhhdtf Esq. cllned the American command, meMy because It dtd notpomiie to be 10 lucrative as Rome othert. National gratitude has, berhapi, been displayed with premature liberality, if those whomvero- ceived honours and rewards for former serylces are to hold back, in proud indifference, when their country once more n!tfd» thiir prtaenet m the field of honour. The American navy ^ok;» under the pressure of a contest with the greatest naral power that ever existed / Paradoxical as this appean, it is a simple fact ; and it proves more than a thousand arguments the ahaoMe impoeeibiliig ihere m of our concluding a peace^ tU ihepnsefU mammU without rendering oumelvea the contempt of our antagoniets, and tlu ridicule of all the world beside. Shall we ALLOW the Gftier- riere to get to sea with impunity ; and to bear to evbry part of the world a visible record of our shame, in that defeat, whioii> entailed on us so many subsequent dia^^races ? The new ftigatft' of that name, mounting 64 guns, is at Philadelphia, nearly ready for sea. The Wttslnngtony akiuther new ship, carrying 90 guns, is fitting very fast for sea at Boston ; and the independence, of 00, faas been recently constructed at Portsmouth, in NeW'Hampshire. The last-mentioned vessel is considered to be more than a match for the largest man of war ever built in Bngland. She is manned with a full complement of 1,000 prime sailors ; and what is also of the utmost consequence, her weight of mdal is far superior to that of any ship in our navy, since her heaviest shot are not less than 6B>pounders. When we have received so many me/an- choly proofs of the effect produced by this superiority in weight o, mdal, and when we have had no less than two yean and a half to profit by the painful lessons, it most indicate absolute infatua- tion, if we have not adopted some measures to place our seamen on an equality with those whom they have to oppose." And new, my lord, how different is this language from that of the speeches in which the American naval force was described as consisting of <* half a dosenySr frigates, with bits of striped bunting at their mastheads!'* I always said, that this war, if con> tinued for any length of time, would create a natty, sl formidable navy, in America ; and is not this creation going on at a great rate T Yet, while this empty fool is exciting our alarms about the Yankee navy, he is crying out against peace, because Mr. Madi- son's government is on the " very verge of bankruptcy** Without stopping to observe that this is a servile imitation of the language of ^ the great statesman now no more," in the year 1704, as to the state of France, just 20 years before the war with her ended, how stupid must the man be to rely Upon the financial dif- ficulties of America, one moment, and the next, represent her as creating a great navy quicker than navy was ever before created i Pray, mark the fool, my lord. He says, that " the American navy grows under the pressure of the greatest naral power that LfiUm of WUUam CobbdU Etq, m l! merican orer niited.*' Well, add whtt ii hii remedy .^ To remore the , came? To take off that fecund presMire? No; but precisely the • contrary ; for, aayi he, the fact ** proves more than a tbouaand ar- guments the absolute imposgibUify then is iff n«^ v. But, ray lord, the description of the new Yankee ships Isjilgff and wilfully false. It comes, it is said, /rom Ho/jfox, our grt>ut naval rendezvous ; and is well calculated to provide, beforei^nd^ for the result of combats, which miy toke place, or, perhaps, nay not take place, with the JFaahingiont the Independencet und the Ouerriere. I told your lordship, that the American pa- pers said that the fVashington was launched at Portsmouth^ in New-Hampshire ; and that she was a 74. Why have these Ha- lifax correspondents swelled her up to a 90 gun ship ? I have isen, in the American papers, nothing at all about the Indepen- dence; but I know that the officii report of the secretary o£ the American navy, last year, spoke of no larger ships than 74's being on the stocks ; and if the American navy-board build 90's aodOS's, and charge the people only for 74's, the practice there is widely different from ours. How many guns the Ouerriere may carry I know not ; but I believe the deacriptidn of her to be at false as that of the other two. But, it is but too easy for the world to perceive the motive for these exaggerated descriptions of the force of the American ships; and it cannot fail to produce a very bad impression, with regard to us, amougst the people of America, whose eyes are constantly upon us, and who naturally and justly seize on all attempts of this sort, as subjects of the most poignant ridicule. As to what this foolish man says about the future command ofi our armjft why should he be so very anxious to see " one of our first fremraW* in Canada ? He, who spoke of the American army with so much contempt ? And, besides, how does he know that we have a bdter than Sir George Prevost ? In a late number of his paper, this man observed, that a more famous commander was, necessary to prevent our men from deserting. He said :•.— " Too deeply have we felt the disgrace of being beaten by land and wetter^ in the last canipaign, to tolerate the chance of similar indig- nities in the next. Besides, we daily see stronger reasons for a hot and short war, wlien we contemplate the wasting etfect of diiatoriness. Our battalions suffer much from disease, but much more from desertion* The temptatiom to this crime, which the 'i ^iji m% LtUm V WUlkm cmtih £«f • 1 111 iiitMrtcmia A0%r, »'/e loo itrtoog to Mi rciiitod hj tttmibep» of our Mldleiy. We rjiist not shut our eyes to tho/i'Mdtii/^ ^ kmmam milHrtt to tue influeneo of example, to the ttreRgth^f alluNiMnt. The fteff, th^ only imi^ to keep the eoldier to hb cobun, it to place hioi under a etfrnmander to whom he cao look tip #«^ piiMb md cinifidmee, and #bo iHH lead hint hito aetif e and eoii birdlime. The Times newspaper cheers hltn, indeed, by telling him that he is causing the Yankeu to jfay iaxa; that, though he so sorely feela himself, he does not su^er sneotfi; for that he is making others suffer tOo: To be «Ur^, this n a cmisoling reflection ; but still it is not quite sufllcient to teconcile him to the continuation of the income tax, seeing that, when called on for the money, he sometimes forgets the delight of seeiag others suffer, which he has enjoyed for his money. ^Bat DOW, my lovd, leaving wise Johnny, amiable and honest JcAnny, to his taxes and his hopes of giving the Yankees a^rob- bingu p«pmit ne to remind your lordship, briefly, of the okgitt of tkit war ; for, if I have life to the end of it, thil origin shall not be forgotten. It is necessary, at every stage, to keep It ■teadily in view; for unless we do this, we shall be whollr ** bothered*' out of it at hist, as we were in the case of thd Frencb war. .i The war agahist France was a war against principles, at flrst; it then became a war of conquest, and ended in being a war for ddtverance. We set out with accusing our enemy with being dangerous, as disorganixers of ancient governments, m6 we ended with accusbig them of being dangerous, as despots. The French were too free for us at the beginning, and too mmh en- slaved for us at the end ; and it was so Contrived as to make more than half- the world believe, that the Cossacks were the great champions of civil and political liberty. So that,' when we came to the dose, leaving the French nearly as we found them, not seeing tythes, monks, game-laws, gabelles, corvees, bastiles,or seig* newiali courts re-established, we have spent more tl.an a thOumnd miilions of pounds, in a war, of the first object of which we had wholly lost sight. We will not have it thus, niy lord, with regard to the American war. We will not suffer its first object to be lost sight of. Nobody, as to this point, shall be able to " bother'* any historian who is disposed to speak the truth. The w«r with America arose thus: We were at vrar witti France ; America was neutral. We not only exercised our known right of stopping American merchant ships at sea, to search them «( Letters qf WiUiam Cohbett, £if . M4. for eneffiy*« gfoodt, for troopa in tht mtmifs urviu^ and for goods conlrabimd of war ^ which tjiieciei of search, and of aekmro, ID case of detection, Mr. Madison did not oppose either by word or deed. This was a mmitifM rvfht, sometimes disputed by Russia, Holland, Denmark, and Sweden ; but never given up 1^ us, except for awhile, at a time of great danger. This .ght was never disputed by Mr. Madison during the French war f the exercise of it he submitted to without complaint. This was our ** right of »eareh ;" and this right wu enjoyed by us, without any complaint on his part; and this is the right which many people thmk he opposed, and upon that ground they have approved of the war. But the war had nothing to do with this right, any more than it had to do with our right of bringing coals from Newcastle to London. The war was declared by Mr. Madison sgainst us, bth cause we stopped American merchant ships upon the high seas» and impressed people out of them. We said, that we did this in order to recover our own seamen, who were frequently found serving in these American ships ; but it was notorious^ the fact was never denied, and never can be denied, that we impressed thus great numbers o( native Americans, forced them on board of our shipj of war, and compelled them to submit to our discipline, and to risk their lives in fighting for us. These are facts which can never be denied. Mr. Madison, for yoi rs, called upon us to cease this practice. We did not cease. He repeatedly threatened war, if we persevered. We did persevere ; and, after years of remon- strance, be, or, rather, the two houses of congress, the real represen* tatives of the people of America, declared war against us. Here, then, is the cause of the war ; the sole cause of the war ; war long threatened, and, at last, frankly declared, previous to any hostile act or movement on the part of Mr. Madison, or, rather, the congress. For, my lord, though Johnny Bull, wise Johnny, whose generosity would put all other i ions into his own hap- py state ; though wise and generous John talks about Mr. Madi^ son's hostility, it is, in fact, the hostility of the congress; thafc is to say, the hostility of the people ; because the congress are the real, and not the sham, representatives of the people ; and be- cause the congress who declared, and who now support the war, have been chosen during the war, ind just before ii. The mem- bers of the congress do not purchase their seats ; no seats can be bought or sold ; none of the members can get any thing for them- selves, or families, by their votes. So that, when they decide, it is, in reality, a majority of the people who decide ; and the peo^^ [rfe did decide that they would resist, by force of a rms, ^e im- pressment of their seamen. The people here generally believe what that infemous print, the Times newspaper, tells them, that the people of America nevet 39 I: .^ • n > tm Letters of William Cobbettt Esiji. I eomplttined of such impressments ; but (he truth is, that, longr l>efore, years before, the war was declared, compbints, and most bitter complaints, had rung through the country agalnKt these im- pressments. Letters from the impressed persons were published t^ithout end. Affidavits proving the facts. Representations enough to make a nation mad with resentment; enough to drive dvdn quakers to arms. None of these have our newspapers ever copied. None of these have they ever made known to their readers. They have published the harangues of Ooodlo'e Harper, H. O. Otis; poor Timothy Pickering, and other would-be tiohJeese. They have given us every thing from the free press of America, at all calculated to cause it to be believed that the war is unpo- pular there ; but not a word on the other side ; not a word to let ns see what were the real sentiments of the majority of fhe re^ public. I will now lay before your lordship som^e of the com- plaints of the impressed Americans, aa published in the American newspapers; for, I am convinced, that even yott are not acquaint- ed fully of the nature and tone of those complaints, and, r.t anj rate, the publications should, if possible, be rebutted on our part, seeing that they must produce such a hatred of us in the minds of the people of America, as will, if not by some means mollified, lead to a never ceasing hostility. Your lordship will perceive that these statements are sent forth with all the forms of judicial acts ; thkt they consist of statements made on oath ; that these statements are certified by legal magistrates, whose names are af- fixed to them; and that, of course, they are calculated to have great weight with the public. It is not a bad way to make the case onr own ; to suppose such complaints made in our papers against America, or any other nation ; and, then, to judge of the effect that those complaints would make on the people of England, recollecting that the Americans are not base and cowardly more than we are. [Here follow several depositions, copied from the newspapers^ of impressed American seamen.] Now, my lord, I do not say that these sentiments are true. In spite of all the particular details of names, dates, and places ; in spite of oaths and certificates, they may be false ; but as it is to such statements that we owe this unfortunate war, we surely ought to endeavour toprove that some, at least, of these statements are false. The republican newspapers teem, and teeradd long before the war, with publications of this sort. The blood of America was set boiling with such publications* The vote of congress, for the war, was the most popular \ote ever given by that body. Jt is, therefore, of vast importance that these publications should be counteracted if possible. They are either true or false ; if the latter, as I would fain hope, they can be easily refuted ; if true, which it would be shocking to believe, certainly we Ought to be \ I ." LHkraofmiliam Cohhm, Esq, "very ready and forward to make atonement to the Americani for wbat they have suffered. These statements have, too, produced another most sericus effect. They have filled the crews with the most implacable re- venge. To the usual motives of patriotism and glory, they have added the still more powertul motive of vengeance. Against crews, thus anima^ted, men under the influence of the mere ordina* ry motive to bravery, really cannot be expected to succeed, with^ out a great superiority of force. I leave your lordship to suppose what would be the effect of statements like these, if the case were OURS. If we were at peace with all the world, and were car- rying on oiur commerce agreeably to the laws of iuutralityf while the Americans were at war with some other power ; and if the Americans were to impress Englishmen from on board English ships,^ bringing up coals from Newcastle to London, were to force them into their ships of war, compel them to fight for America ; and, ia short, to occasion, in the English papers, statements such as I have above quoted : if this were the case, does your lord- ship think that we should be very quiet? And if such statements would be likely to set us in a flame, are we to suppose that they liave had no effect on the Americans ? I Here, my lord, as you well know, we have the real cause of that war, which, it is said, is now to engage a hundred thousand men, two hundred ships of war, and which cannot cost less than twenty millions a year. It has been asserted, that the congress declared war against us to assist Napoleon on the continent. This b so foolish, that the writers must think that they are addressing it to men little superior to brutes. It was impossible that the Americans could know where Napoleon was, when they declared war. It WPS impossible that their war should really aid him in his designs against Russia. It was against their inteiest that Russia should be crushed by any power, and especially by France. The other charge, that America, " like an assassin, attacked us in the dark," is equally false and foolish. How could an open declara- tion of war by a legislative assembly, after repeated discussion, be an act deserving such a description ? How could that be call* ed an attack in the dark, especially when it had been threatened far years, and when it was followed immediately by an offer for a tiitce, in order again to negotiate for peace ? Here we have the real origin of the war. Terminate as it will, this origin must not be forgotten, whatever efforts are made to put < it out of our heads. When the war sbali have ended, and we shall sit down to count the cost, this origin must be kept steadily before us. ^« Svr Robert Walpole used to boast. They will, thereforO; kfeep on barluog ; but, my lord, be assured, that they are wholly unable to bite. I am, &c. &c. Wm. Cobubtt. li: ■"«r- TO THE EABL OF UVERPOOL— ON THE AMERICAN WAB. ija^Lord, ^, : It has all along been my wish to see England at peace with America. My reasons for this I have often explained ; and the mode I have pursued has been this ; to endeavour to prove that the grounds of hope of success held out to us by such writers as the Waltkhs, are fallacious. The division of the slates^ the impeachment of Mr. Madison, the resistance of taxation, and the various other grounds of hope, I have endeavoured to show, were hollow, as much as was tbu expectation of sweeping the ocean of the " half a dozen of 6r frigates, with bits of striped bunt? ing at their mast heads.'* The tasic of counteracting these delu- sive hopes has increased in arduousness with the progress of the war. Beaten out of one hope, these writers have resorted to others ; and, as was the case in the last American war, pride, shame, and revenge, are mustered up, to prolong a war which policy has abandoned. There is, now, a new deUision on foot. Mr. Walter, the pro- Erietor of the Tinus newspaper, who (shocking to think of!) has een a principal actcr in prtnlucing this calamitous war, is now endeavouring to persuade the public that the president of Ame- rica will be unable to raise the force voted by congress to com- plete Ihe regidar army of that great republic to 100,000 men, l)y way «fJa«o(, or wUMi»rvW«iteK.««a|i.ggS[SCBIPTION,. 910 LiiUrs 6f WUliam CohbeU, Biqi To be surej thii is a meaiare very well calculated to aitound •uch a man as Mr. Walter, who knows nothing at all about the people of America ; who receives all his information through the very worst of all possible channels ; who appears to be extremely ignorant himself; who publishes purely for gain ; who desires to flatter the follies and prejudices of his readers ; and who, finding himself the gainer by being the avowed enemy of freedom in ere* ry part of the world, has become, to say nothing of his ^feeding up, a mortal foe to the American government and people. Such a man, who had been led to suppose that the defence of a coun> try, like America, was inconsistent with freedom, naturally relied upon the overthrow of the government, the moment it attempted to raise an army to resist its invaders ; such a man would natural- ly be, as he Am been, almost smothered in the foam of his own malignity, upon seeing a measure like this coolly proposed by Mr. Monroe, (now secretary of war,) attentively considered by a committee of congress, and smoothly passing into a law, made, or to be made, by the real, and not the sham, representatives of a free people, elected by that people only a few months before, and knowing that they are agaia to be elected or rejected by that ■ame people, a few mouths afterwards. This has astounded Mr. Walter. It has, apparently, given his brain a shock too rUde for its poweri of resistance. It has upset all his calculations; and he is now crying out for a rebellion in America, as fiercely as he ever cried out for bullets, bayonets, halters, and gibbets, for the rebels in Ireland ; but, never losing sight of his old object, name- ly, to delude this nation into the hope that the measure must fail, and that, therefore, v jught to continue the mar. Despicable, therefore, as this writer may be ; contemptible as is his stock of understanding ; mean and malignant as may be his motives, his efforts merit attention, and call upon us to counteract them without loss of time. In doing this, I must first take the best account that I can find of this grand measure of the American governmfent, to which has been given the name of conscription. The following is the report of the bill, as republished by Mr. Walter himself : [Here follows an analysis of the bill reported by the military committee on Mr. Monroe's plan.] Such is the measure which, Mr. Walter assures us, cannot be carried into effevi ; but says, that if it could be carried into effect, would deprive us of Canada in a year, unless we sent out our ** great national hero ;** and, indeed, that, under the bare pos- sibility of such a measure's succeeding, <* we ought to cast aside all European politics." What a change, my lord ! This foolish gentleman used to tell us, that the Americans would be ** reduced*^ as the old phrase was, in ^'a/iTV weeks.** He has often exhausted all his powers of speech to convince his readers, that this enemy lMt$r8 qf Willmm Cobbttt, Esqjk ii» militaFy i^as too despicable to be treated with in the same sort of vny that we treat with other nations. There is no expression of conteinpt» oootained in our copious language, which he did not use towards America and her president. And this 'same foolish Mr. Walter now (ehs us, that so great is this same America, that, in order to meet her with a chance of success, we ought " to coat cuide M European poiitiea" ; il hieg your lordship, now, to have the patience to read Mr* Walter's remarks, at liifi length, upon this measure of defence ia America. The article is of consequence ; because, though com- Vig from such a source, though proceeding from a son, or sons, of Old Walter of regency memory, it is what will give thtcue to almost, all the rich people in the metropolis, and to not a few ot those in the country. After inserting this article, I will endea- vour lo show its folly and. its malice; and, were the author any other than a Walter, I should not be afraid to promise to make him hide his head for shame. <* No certain or official account of the rupture of the negotia« tioDS at Ghent has yet reached this country. Private letters, it Is true, have been received, stating that the American commis- sioner, Mr. Adams, was about to set otf for St. Petersburgb, and that Mr. Gallatin had proposed that a single individual on each side should be left at Ghent, to take advantage of any opening for renewing the negotiation; but both these statements are at variance with those contained in other letters of the latest data from Ghent, received by the French mail of yesterday, according to which, the diplomatic intercourse still continued. We repeat, that we do not think this the point to which the public attention ought to be directed. We should look, not to the fallacious terms of an artful negotiation ; but to the infallible evidence of our ene- my's mind and intentions, displayed in his conduct. The bill for a conscription of the whole American population, is a measure that cannot be mistaken. Whilst such a bill is in progress, and before it is known whether the people will submit to its being carried into execution, it would be madness to expect a peace. It would be madness to expect a peace with persons who have made up their minds to propose so desperate a measure to their countrymen ; for, either they nmst succeed, and then the into^u- cation of their pride will vender them utterly intractable ; or, (which is, indeed, more probable,) they must fail, and their failure mus. precipitate them from power, and, consequently, render treating with them impossible. <* When an American gentleman of splendid attainmentSf some years since, composed his celebrated review of the conscription code of that monster Buonaparte, he could not possibly tbresee that his own country would, in so short a time, be subjected to the same barbarous humiliatien. The prime and flower of the ':''n '■h 319 LetUhra t{f William Cobbett, Etq, ►'''■ ■>*v Anisrican citizens are to be taken by lot ! and deHvered orer to the marshals, who are to deliver them over to the officers aatho- riiad to receive them, who are to act at the discretioD, and nndtoir the arbitrary direction of the president. Thus doet Mr. Madi« Bon, from a simple repablican magistrate, suddenly tftart up a mi* lUnrif detpot of the most mnguinary character'-^ double of thtt blood-thirsty wretch at Elba. We are convinced that this suddcfn and violent shoek to ail republican feelings, to all the habifs of the people in all parts of the union, cannot \*if made with impunttp^ Certain it is that this law cannot stand alone.^ To give it the lenft chance of being put in execution, it must be accompanied with alt the other chapters of that bloody code by which Frande was disgraced, and barbarized, and demoralized. Who is to hunt down the refractory conscripts ? Who is to drag them, chained Id' gether in rows, to the head^quarters of the military division? Who is to punish them, their parents, relations, and friends ? Event Buonaparte was many years in bringing to its diabolical perfection the machinery bf his system ; and carefully as Mr. Monroe may have studied in that accursed school, it cannot be supposed that he has, at one flight, placed himself on a level with his great in^ structor. It is highly probable that many of the men who have fabonred in the details of oppression and violence, under the dia* tUrber of Europe, may have, by this time, made their way to America, where they will doubtless receive a cordial welcome from Mr. Madison, and be set to work to rivet the collar on the necks of the American citizens ; but we own that, ' with all appliances and means to boot,' the president, in our opinion, must fail. Nevertheless, it would be most dangerous to suffer such an opinion to produce the slightest relaxation in our efibrta. The British government should act as if it saw Mr. Monroe at the head of his hundred thousand regulars, well disciplined and equipped, carrying the war, as he distinctly threatens he will do, into the very heart of Canada. Late as it is, we must awake. Eight months ago, the Duke of Wellington, with his army might have fallen like a thunderbolt upon the Washington cabinet, leav« ing them no time for conscriptions, no means of collecting French officers to discipline their troops, no opportunity to intrigue for friendship and support among the continental powers of Europe. It is not yet too late for striking a decisive blow ; but that blow must be struck with all our heart, and wit' 11 our strength. Let us but conceive the proposed hundred thousand regulars embodied in *he course of the ensuing spring. Does any one believe that, without a mighty effort on our part, the Canadas could be retained another year ? Would not the exultation of seeing himself at the head of such a force, urge Mr. Madison, at all hazards, to com* plete his often-tried invasion ? Even if his scheme should but partially succeed, and he should be only able to drag on a defen* Itdtera of Willimn Cohhiil, Esq, 013 91199 war for inother twelvemonths, who knowB what alliea that period may Btir up for him, under the false pretences of regard ^H* neutral rights, and for the liberty of the seas ? On our side, to emchide a peace at the present moment, would be to confess our- •elves intimidated by the warlike preparations of the enemy. It seems, therefore, that we have but one path to folbw. What- %v*' ' was the force destined to act against America, before this DARINO BILL of Mr. Monroe's was thought of, let thatforct tMtantljf be doubled ; let U8 cast aside all European polUiea thtit cross this great and paramount object of our exertions* Let a general of commanding name be at once despatched to 'the seat of war. We have often said, and we repeat it, that America is a scene on which the Duke of Wellington's takiits might be displayed far more beneficially to his country, than they can pos- sibly be in (be courtly circles of the Tbuillieres ; but if his grace must necessarily be confined to the dull round of diplomatic bu- siness, at least, let some officer be sent, whom the general voice of the army may designate as most like in skill and enterprise to our great national hero. Fatal experience has shown us, that no effort of such an enemy is to be overlooked. When the flag of the Guerriere was struck, we saw in it that disastrous omen, which has since been but too sadly verified on the ocean, and on the lakes. The triumphs of the American navy have inspired even their privateers with remarkable audacity. The present pa<- 5ers mention the cruises of the Peacock, the Chasseur, and the iammoth, all of which were very successful, and all ventured on the coa^t of England and Ireland. The two latter, being Ame- rican built, outsailed every thing that gave them chase. This ia a circumstance requiring strict eUiention on the part of our ad" miraliy. Surely there must be some discoverable and imitable cause of a celerity in sailing, which is so important a point of na- val tactics. Mr. Fulton, of Catamaran memory, appears to have employed himself on a naval machine of singular powers. It ia described as a steam frigate, and is intended to carry red-hot shot of one hundred pounds weight. When we remember how con- trary to expectation was the tremendous effect of the batteries of the Dardanelles, we cannot entirely dismiss from our minda all apprehension of the effect of this new machine of Mr. Fulton's.*' Before I proceed to inquire into the justice of these charges against Mr. Monroe's bill, I cannot refrain from noticing, in a par- ticular manner, one phrase of this article. Mr. Walter (for, hire he whom he will to write for him, he is the author) calls the bill, " this DARING bill of Mr. Monroe's.'* Mr. Walter is no grammarian, ray lord ; nor is it necessary that he should be, to qualify him for addressing such people as the well-attired rabble of England, who are his readers. But this is not the thing that 40 #u LaUn of William Cobbdtt Esq, I! i have iu view ; / want your lordship to mark the word *' DAit* INO," as applied to thia bill : as if it were a thing which the re- 1>ublic ought not to thiqk of without our pertniHsion ; aa if it were ike tlie act of a servant taking up a sword and challmging hi* inasler ; as if it a were a trait of inaolence unbearable in a nation at war with big John Bull, to take effectual means to resist his at- tacks on their shores ; as if it were audaoUms in them to provide the means of preventing their cities, towns, and villages, from be- ing plundered or burnt. Thia Mr. Walter, only a few days ago, called Mr. Jefferson '< liar and slave.'* He has a hundred times called Mr. Madison a miscreant^ a traitor^ a liar, a villain ; and has as often insisted that no peace ought ever to be made with ^im. He has frequently insisted that Mr. Madison and his fac' tion (the majority of Congress) must be hurled from their seats, fle has called Mr. Jefferson the old serpent. In short, it is the next to impossible to think of any vile term or epithet, which thia author has not applied to the American president, and the majority of that congress which is the real representation of the Ameri- can peopl^. And yet he has the cool impudence to speak of this bill, this measure of defence j as if it were something insolent to- wards us, |\ The truth is, my lord, we have so long bad to deal wkh East Indians, and Portuguese, and Spaniards, and Italians, and Ger- mans, and Dutchmen, and Russians, and Imperialist Frenchmen, that we are quite spoiled for a dealing with the Americans. We have, at last, arrived at such a pitch, that we regard it as inso- lence in any people even to tr.lk of resistingus. Mr. Walter is, in this respect, but the mouth-piece of his readers. We must correct ourselves as to this way of thinking and talking, if the war with America continue ; or we shall be exposed to the deri* sion of the whole world. Now, then, as to Mr. Monroe's measure. Mr. Walter describes it as a conscription ; says that it will subject the people to bar- barous humiliation ; says that it makes the president a military despot of the most sanguinary character ; asks who is to chaiu the conscripts, and drag them to the head- quarters of the military division ; calls the raising of this force putting a collar on tlie necks of the American citizens. These are the charges which Mr Walter prefers against this grand measure of the republic ; and he observes, that " when an American gentleman of splendid attainmentSy some years ago, composed his celebrated review of the conscription code of that monster Buonaparte, he could not possibly foresee that his own country would so soon be subjected to the same barbarous hu- miliation." This gentleman of " splendid attainments" was a Mr. Walsh of Philadelphia, who, having been in France, came over to England, where, under the patronage of the friends of h^Uera of William Cobhell, Esq, ^mi of Inibery and corruption, he wrote uid pobl'mhed a pampUet, calculated to aid their views. This pamphlet clearly showed, that the author was one of those Americans, who, by the vain splendour that they here behold, and by the hope oC sharing in it, have been induced to apostatize from the principles of their own republican government. This young man, whose work was really a very poor performance, abounding with inoon- aistencies, and, indeed, with downright falsehoods, had his bead turned by the flatteries of the hireling writers and reviewers here ; and I should not wonder if his work acquired him the un« apeakable felicity of hearing, that evm his name was mentioned in a conversation between two lords. The great recommendation of the work, was, that it was not the work of an EnglishnutH, No : it was said to be the work of an American, who, of course, was ^ friend of the French, and not at all disposed to exa^erate in describing their misery. This was the fraudulent colour undf r which the work got into circulation. Mr. Walsh was a tool in the hands of crafty men, who dazaled him with praises. But, now, as to the resemblance between Mr. Monroe's knear sure and the conscription of Napoleon : Ist. The French conscription was decreed by an arbitrary despot, assisted by an assembly whom the people had not chosen. The levy in America, is ordered by a law, passed by the con- gress, who are the real, and not the sham., representatives of the people; who have recently been freely chosen by the people; and who, if they desire to be re-elected, must act so as to please the people ; the time of their re-election being near at hand. 2d. The French conscript was called out to fight for the sup- port and aggrandizement of a particular family, and for the sup- port also of nobles in the possession of their titles and estates. It was the honour of the crown that the Frenchmen was called on to fight for, and that, too, in distant lands. The American citizen is called out to defend no sovereign family, no cronn, no nobles, to give no security, and to ^ain no renown for them^ or any of them ; but to figlut for the safety, liberty, and honour of a country, where the>'c are no distinctions of .rank, and where, of course, every individual fights, when he does fight, in bis orvti cause as much as in the cause of the president himsekl 3d. The French conscription compelled personal service. The American levy contains no such compulsion. Every twenty* five men, between the ages of 1 8 and 45, are to furnish one man. lf.no one of .the twenty-five will serve in person, the whole twenty- five together, are, according to their properly, to pay a certain 8um of money. 4th. The French conscript, while he left, perhaps, an aged father or mother at home, living in penury, was fighting for an •emjperoj:, whose wife carried about her person, at thejaatioo's ex.' 9ie> Letim of WiUiam CohheH, Esq. penu, dtcorationa, wiiich cost a« much as would h«t« fed thou-* (Mods of familiei for a year. The Anerican levymao knowt that fail government) aH taken together, president, congrMi* judges, secretaries, clerks and all, do not cost so much in a jneat as is swallowed by an imperial family in one sii^le day. « »<' «« 6th. France was not invaded. This is a very material point* America was, and is invaded. Her village, towns, and cities^ have been plundered and burnt. A continuation of this mode of warfare has been distinctly declared by our admiral to have been resolved on. It is invasion, it is devastation, it is fire, it it the sword, it is plunder at their very doors, and in their very dwellings on the coast, that the American levy are called forth to repel, to punish, or to prevent. It is no possible, no imaginary^ no distant danger, that has called forth this measure from the con* gress : it is actual invasion ,* it is an enemy in the couBtry, thore laying waste, plundering, and killing y lawfully, if you please ; but that is no matter. If Napoleon had landed an army here, be would have been justified in so doing by the laws of war ; but when we expected bira even to make the attempt at invasion, did we confine ourselves to measures like this of Mr. Monrqe ? Did we not call upon the whole of the people to be ready to comd out under martial lam ? But I am here raticipating another part of the subject of my letter. ' • So much, then, for the veitmhiante between the French cow icription and the American levy ; and I am sure that your lord- ship will allow, that they no more resemble one another than this RuouTKR resembles the Times newspaper. What, then, becomes of Mr. Walter's bombastical trash about samfruinary despots and chained conscripts ? Yet, he will find dupes I He has found dupes for many years ; and he will continue to find them upon this ■ubject, I fear, till we shall see an American fleet on the coast of Ireland; an occurrence more probable than, at one time, was thought the capture of an English frigate by a republican thing with a hit of striped bunting at its masthead, as Mr. Canning thought proper to describe the American frigates. But, my lord, it is not with the French conscription alone that I mean to accompany the republican levy. Let us see (for that will bring the thing home to us) what is the nature of this measure of Mr. Monroe, compared with our militias. We have two or three militias ; but there are two* clearly dis^ tinguished from each other : one is called the militiOf and the other the local militia. The former consists of men called out by BAIjLOT, without ANY REGARD TO THE AMOUNT OF THEIR PROPERTY. Each man, so called im, must serve in person, or must, out of his own pocket, find a man to serve in bis stead ; and seeing that the service is, in all respects, except that of being sept over sea, the same as -that oC Letftra qf William Cobbdl, Etq, 31? regular loldMri; iceiDg that the man may be marched to anj parioC the kingdom, may be quartered in camp, in barracks, aaid M aubjeoted to all military paint and penalties, the price of sub- •titutee haa long been so high that no labourer or joameyman has, out of his own pocket, been able to procure a substitute. Noir» you see, there is a wide difference here ; for the man of small means in America has twenty-four others to assist him io paying the money necessary to engage a substitute. Twenty-five men are put into a class. It' one of them goes to serve, the others are able to make him a handsome compensation. If one of them choose to serve, the money, in lieu of the service of one man, is to b« collected from twenty-five men. And, which is the beauty of this admirable scheme, when it comes to the payment of money, each person is to pay, not the Bame sum, but o sum in proporiim io the amount of his means. In England, the names of all of cer* tain ages, in each parish, are put into a box, out of which \h9 number wanted are drawn. It happens, of course, that, of four^ one is a rich merchant, another a farmer, another a journeyman tailor, and another a labourer. Each is to serve in person, or find a substitute. The price of the substitute is as high for the poor as for the rich. The two latter, therefore, who have no property to defend, must serve, or they must rake together the means of paying for the defence of the property of the rich, and thus in* volve themselves in debt, and expose their families, if they have any, to misery. But, you see, Mr. Monroe's scheme most ef- fectually provides against this. It puts all the male population* between 18 and 45, into classes of twenty-five men. Each class is to send one man. If they agree amongst themselves who shall go^ the thik *; is done. If none of them choose to go, then the twenty-five are to pay a sum of money ; but here they are not to pay alike ; the journeyman tailor and the labourer are not to pay li^ the merchant and the farmer ; every man of the twenty-five is to pdLj in proportion to his property ; and thus does the burden ' of defence fall, with arithmetical correctness, on the thing to be defended. And this^ my lord, is what Mr. Walter calls a " conscriptions^* this he > alls a measure of " barbarous humiliation'^ to the peo* pie of /.merica ; for proposing this measure he calls Mr. Madiaon 9l *^ sanguinary despot;** this is the measure which, he says, will never be submitted to by the republicans. The foolish man will soon have to announce his astonishment at the complete suc- cess of the measure ; if he has not, I will acknowledge myself to be as great a fool as he. But, to proceed, our local militia were to serve only within their several counties, but their service has now been extended ; though, except in cases of urgency, they are to be called out only a month in the year. Here no man must get the meanq of :';, -m ■ 'ip\ 318 LtHera qf William Oobbelt, Etq. MM i W H' HiK it IIk Hil fairing t substitute from any inaurancif or citi6. He miifll make MO bargain with hia master to work out the amount of the penaltjr. He must smear that the ten pounds comes out of his own present means, or he muitt serve in person. In this case, however, we &pproach a little nearer to Mr. Monroe's excellent scheme ; for in this militia, we proportion the property ef him who refuses to aerve ; though a rich farmer stiH pays only about tnentjf pownds^ while the poorest of his labourers must pay ten pounds^ though, certainly, the property of the former may be estimated at two or three thousand times greater than the property of the latter. Now, according to Mr. Monroe's scheme, a couple of farmers would find themselves classed with twenty-three labourers am! journeymen blacksmiths, coliar*maker8, wheelwrights, &c. &c. And, of course, the two farmers would pay 24*35ths of the penalty ; or, which would be the natural result, one man, out of the twenty-five, with a handsome reward from the resi, would cheerfully take up the musket instead of the dung>uji:k, or the sledge-hammer. But the most important distinction still remains to be noticed ; (hat is to say, that we have, for twenty years, had a militia on foot, under martial law, under officers commissioned by thi king^ under the regular discipline^ lodged in camps or barracks^ marched to everj/ comer of the kingdom, without any actual miMi- sion of the country. These regiments have been kept up^ the ballotiijg has been going on, and no invaders have come to burn our villages, towns, and cities ; or to plunder them, or lay them under contribution: While, in America, we are invading and laying waste ; we are taking /lennanen/ possession of one district ; we are compelling the people to swear allru;iance to our king; we have a mighty naval force continuaUy menacing the seacoaat ; we have one artny afloat here, another there, more are out, and this Mr. Walter is calling till he is hoarse for more troops to be sent to devastate and divide the country, to overturn the vepubhcan government, and reduce the people to unconditional submission ; all this he is doing, while he is, at the same time, crying out against the ^* barbarous" scheme of calling upon the people of property to defend their country, either in their persons, or with their purses. Ay, my lord ! fool as Mr. Walter is, he perceives that Mr. Monroe's is an infallit'e scheme for raising an army in a short time, and for keeping that army complete. He, fool as he is, smells powder in every line of this scheme. But it is hi« business to misrepresent, to disfigure, to induce his well-dressed rabble of readers, and you, too, if possible, to believe, that the scheme will fall ; and that, therefore, we ought to carry on the war with ail imaginable energy. I trust, however, that you are not to be misled by him, or by any body else. I trust that you icill see the danger which thh) wise and equitable plan presents t« Laitrt of ITtlltam Cobhetly Etq. 910 M* I (ruit that you will at once abandon all hopci of extorting any conceMion from a country which ha» now ibown, that diffi- cultiet and dangers, ai they preaa upon her, only tend to increaaa her energy, to raise her spirit, and make her more formidable. 1 have respect enough for the understanding of your lordship to believe, that you have read Mr. Monroe^s letter to the chairman of the military conunittee with great attention, and not without ■ome degree of alarm. But the conclriioa of it is so very im* portant, that I cannot refrain from agam calling your attention to it. Ht. " I should," says ^':., ** insult the understanding, and wound the feelings of the committee, if I touched on the calamities inci- dent to dejfeat. Dangers which are remote, and can never be realized, excite no alarm with a gallant and generous people. But the advantagea of auccesa have a fair claim to their deliberate consideration. The effort we have already made has attracted the attention and extorted the praise of other nations. Already have most of the absurd theories and idle speculations on our ayatem of governmentf been refilled and put down. We are now felt and respected as a power ; and it ia the dread which the enemy erUerlain of our resources and growing importance^ that has in- duced him to press the war against us after ita professed olijecta ^d ceased. Success, by discomfiture of his schemes^ and the at- tainment of an honourable peace, will place the United States on hightr grounds, in the opinion of the world, than they have held at any former period. In future wars, their commerce will 6c permitted to take its lawful range unmolested. Their remon- strances to foreign governments will not again be put aside, un- heeded. Few will be presented, because there will seldom be occasion for them. Our union, founded on internal affection, will have acquired new strength by the proof it will have afforded of the important advantages attending it. Respected abroad, and happy at home, the United States will have accomplished the great objects for which they have so long contended. As a na- tion, they will have little to dread, as a people, little to desire.*' I beseech your lordship's serious attention to these important words. I allow, that peace now made on the basis of the Status Quo would be success to America. 1 have often said this before. To defend herself against us, single banded, will be most glori' otts triumph to her, and will elevate her in the eyes of all the world. But, then, my lord, to repeat once more what I have so often said, what will he the consequence of her success at the end of a ten years*, or a five years' war? How much greater would then be her triumph ? How much greater her weight in the world ? How much more proud her defiance of us? How much more powerful her navy ? How much more exasperated her people against us ? .'•i?: ■ ■If* 320 Letters of William Cobbettt Esq. I* K '*' I confesB, that, after all that has been said here about Mr. Ma* dison ; after all the threats of our press to depose him ; after all the "liarst traitors, hi/pocrites,'* &c. that the press has called him ; after all the expectatious of seeing a viceroy sent out to Washing- ton city, it would sink the heart of John Bull down into his shoes to see a peace made with this same Mr. Madison, without extort- ing something from him. But you and your colleagues ought to despise this national folly, created by the venal men, who live by misrepresentation and falsehood ; whose tables are furnished with the fruits of flattering popular prejudices. 4 I confess, too, that the friends of Captain Henry ; that the would'be noblesse of Massiichusetts ; that the federalists in ge- neral, would be put down forever by a peace with Mr. Madison, on terms honourable to America, made at this time ; and which peace would clearly have been obtained by the wisdom of his measures, and the bravery of those whom he has employed. But hang these scTvy noblesse, my i»rd ! They ai-e poor creatures. They cannot is^ist us. The' population of America is essentially republican, from one end to the other. These poor things have tried their uttoost; and they have failed. As long as they are stimulated with the hope of forcing open the offices of government by the mistortunes of their country, they will talk big about a sc paration of tlie union ,* but the moment that that hope dies with^ in them, you will see them as quiet as mice. And really, 1 do not know of any thing more likely to kill that hope than the scheme of Mr. Monroe, which will not only bring forth an efficient army now, but which will hold an efficient army always in readiness at a week's notice, while, atv.t^t- rzine time, it a ill obviate the ne- cessity of a standing" army tsd cr' a great permanent expense, and will prevent the execi!tive government from acquiring a pa- tronage inconsistent with the principles of republican governiucQt, and dangerous to pohtical and civil liberty. w. I confess, moreover, that there is another class of men, whom you would mortally oifend by making a peace that should be ho- nourable to America : 1 mean, the haters of freedom. I do not mean . . . . ••....... This moment has arrived the Courier newspaper with news of the PEAC£I. I do not not know how to express the pleasure I feel at this news, or the gratitude, which,ybr this act, 1, in common with my coun- trymen, owe to your lordship and your colleagues. Far be it from me to rejoice at what (he Times calls the disgrace of the navy of England, and the humiiialion of the crown ; but being fully convinced, the longer the war had continued the more disgrace' ful and dangerous would have been the result, I do most sincerely rejoice at this auspicious event, and certainly not the less on ac- count of its being calculated to baffle the views of that bypocriti- 1 Mr. Ma- ter all the led him; iVashiog- his shoes [it extort* ought to ) live by hed with ; that the 8t8 io ge- Madison, ad which im of his ed. But creatures. taentially iugs have they are vernment bout a «e- dies with- lily, I do ^e scheme lent army readiness te the ne- ( expense, ring a pa* rernuicat, en, whom Id be ho- I do not } moment >EACJE. this news, my coun- )e it from the navy ling fully disgrace* sincerely Bs on ac- lypoci'iti- Letters of WUliifm Colbettt Esq. m Q^^ faction, who have still th« impudence to call themBelvet whigs, I am, &c. &c* WlUilABI COBBCTT. , Bqtlejj 28th December, 1814. Hit AMEBICA. li. Mr. Hunfs motion, and Sir John Cox Hippi8ley*8 speech, r^* speding her. — The Courier* a attack on Mr. Binns, a publisher at Phuadelphia. #*■ .... ;,5j, ' *^' At a meeting of the county of Somerset, on the 9th inat. a 4^tious occurrence took place with regard to the peace with Aihe* ilea. I wiH first give the account of it from the Times nemspch per of the 16th inst. and make on it such observations as most naturally present themselves. The reader should first be inform- ed, however, tiiat the meeting was held for the purpose of discuss- ing a petition to parliament against ^e property tax, or tax upcm income, which tax ought, by law, to expire in a few months, butof which tax, it b supposed, the go\ smment means to propose the continuation or revival. The following is the report of the Times: ' '^' %" *' Or Monday last, at the meeting of the freeholders, &c. liolden at Wells, to petition parliament for the repeal of the pro^ perty tax, after the business of the day was disposed of, (an ac- count of which has already appeared in this paper,) Mr. HtviT remarked, that the meeting should not disperse without expressing its thankfulness to those by whose efforts peace had been made between us and America. He therefore read a resolution, which he submitted for their approbation : * That the thanks of this meeting are due to those by whose exertions peace with the Ame- ricans, the only remaining free people in the world, has been re- stored to this country.* Sir J. C. Hippisley could see no rea- son whatever for calling the Amei leans the only free people in the world, and should certainly divide the meeting if the motion was persisted In. It was a libel on our own country; for his part, he HATED THE AMERICANS. They were a set of slavet to the government of France, and — (some expresafions of disap- probation arose ;) when Mr. Dickensoit said, that he certainly must join in deprecating the resolution. He hoped the meeting would not consent to compliment any nation at the expense of our own, and of every other on the globe, ite had considerable rea- ,Aon for believing that the congress at Vienna was now employed 41 m m !f!l- ' i.'h \ij s. a»9r Lmm (^Witliam 0obbett, Esq- s*4 V i'^'^ 1-"' ' t;"* IB eadeaveuriag to unrivet Ute chains of Ike siffering Afrietms s ^^r engaged aa the powers of Europe were, in so sacred a cause* ha could not consent that any aspersion, direct or indirect, should be cast upon them. Mr. JEIunt then requested the sheriff to put the resolution, which, upon the show of hands, was negatived bjr a very coiwiderabh majority." Whether there be my free countri/ in the world still remaiiuag, besides the republic of America, is a question that I do jiot choose to decide, or to give my opinioii upon. But I cannot help observ- ing, that the question was decided in the negative by a meeting of the county of Sotnerset only by a ** constekrob/e majority i'*, and, I must further obseirve, that the report of this ^^cqtisiderqh dje majority** comes to us through the Times newspap^, th^t channel of skunk-like abuse of America, and all that is American, liet it be remembered^ too, that the power of deciding who had the msy«r|ty lay whpUy and absolutely with the aherll^, who i| «n officer appointed by the crown. This being the caae, tb«, words,, ^* coiuideraJble majority," will be pretty well understood to meap on^ thing but a large majority ; and, perhaps, some people may doubt whether there was any majoi^ty at all. , At any late, the county of Somerset dividitd upon the question of wh^thfir America was, or was not, the only free country left in the w6rld>i Oahuwuij at least, a qpestion for which many were in the affirma* five. It was received and put to vote without any marks of difif approbation ; while, on the other hand, he was htased who said that he hated the Americans^ and who called them ^iite slaves of the French government. And why, good Sir John, do you bats the Americans ? What have they done to you ? You say that they are the slaves of the government of France ; but you, dp not find it convenient to produce any proof of what you qay. This, Sir Jolui, is one of the old stale falsehoods, of the Tim^ fiewspaper, which you are retaitipg at secondhand, like a Grub- f treet pedler. You are, in this instance, a poor crawling imitator of a wretched grinder of paid'for paragraphs* Prove^ or attempt to prove, what you say. Attempt, at least, to prove, (hat the Americans are the slaves, or have been the slaves of tl». French or you must be content to go about saddled with the charge of having made an assertion, without being either able or wiUiugto show it to be true. I assert, that the Americans were not, in any ahape or def,ree, subservient to France. I assert, that they all along acted the port of a nation truly independentf X assert, that they, in no case, showed a partiality for the government, of Na- poleon. If any proojf were wanted of their having placed no re- liance upon Francct we have it in the fact, the &ct lo honourable, *o glorious to them, and so unfortunate for us ; I mean the fact of their continuing the contest c^er Napoleon was puH down, and still, as firmly as before, refusing to giv€ up to us one sit^le point. Letters of Willialn Cobhett, E»^ dS3 is««h« put the 1 by* laiiung, choose observ- oaeeting lorityiV, v, that aerican. rho bad who i| WW, tb« lerstood ta, some Ataay whether s woric^ aSrma* I of d\»? rho said laves of yon hats ,aj that you. do rou ^ay. TimtM Grubf imitator attempt ibat the French, barge of riUiug to . |o any they all kert»lhat of Na* id no rs- iQUrable, (act of and Btill, le pointf titongh they ttw in allied with all Europe, and though the^ Mir the whole of our momtrous force directed against them, having no other enemy to contend with. This proves that they placed no reliance upon France. When they declared war, they saw us with a powerful enemy in Europe. Upon that circumstance they^ of course, calculated, as they had a right to do; but when thai enemy, contrary to their expectation, was put down all of a sadden* end the whole of our entfrmous force was bent against America^ •he was not intimidated. Bfae still set us at deOance ; she faced UB ; she fought us ; and, at the end of a few months, instead of fcceivmg • viceroy at Washington, as we had been told she would* ■he brought us to make peace with her without her giving npto us one single point of any sort. Deny this, if you can. Sir Johni and, if you cannot, answer to the people of Somerset for th* speech which the Times has published as yours. But, Sli John, why do you HATE the Americans? You cannot, surely, bate them because they pay their President only abeut six thou* sand pounds a year, not half so much as our ApOTHBeARV Obnb* liAL receives. You, surely, cannot hale them because they do not pay in the gross amount of their taxes as much as we pay tot the mere collection and management of ours. Ybu, surely, can- not hate them because they keep m> sinecure placemen, and nil pensioners, except such as have actually rendered them servi^ ces, and to them grant pensions only by vote of their real repre* ientatives. You, surely, cannot hate them becausej in their coun^ try, the press is really free, and tntth cannot be a libel. You^ surely, cannot hate them because they have Rhown that a chee^ government is, in fact, the strongest of all governments, standing in no need of troops or of treason laws to defend it, in times even of actual invasion. You may, indeed, pity them, because they are destitute of the honour of being governed by some illustriouf family ; because they are destitute of Dukes, Royal and others, of Most Noble Marquises, of Earls, Viscounts, and Barons ; because they are destitute of Knights of the Garter, Thistle and Bath, Orand Crosses, Commanders and Companions ; because they are, in spite of the effiirts of the Massachusetts intriguers, still destitute of Il- lustrious Highnesses, Right Honourables, Honourables, and Es- quires ; because they are destitute of long robes and big wigs, and see their lawyers, of all ranks, in plain coats of gray, brown, or blue, as chance may determine ; because they are destitute of a church established by law, and oftythesyou; may, indeed, pity the repubricans on these accounts ; but, Sir John, it would be cruel to bate them. To hate is not the act of a christian, and very illy becomes a man like yourself, who has been a hero, a per- fect dragon, in combating the anti-christian principles of the French Revolution. Pity the Americans, Sir John. Forgive them. Sir John. Pray for them, Sir John. But do nqt hste them, thou m r l| M LaUri of ffUliam Cobbettt Ea^^k and fortune defender of our holy religion. Pray (hat tbey may. •peedily have a King and Royal Family, with a Commander in Chief and Field Marshals ; that they may have a Civil List and Sinecures ; that they may have Lords, Dukes, Grand Crosses, Clergy, Regular Army, and Tythes; pray for these things, in their behalf, as long as you please ; pray that the Americans may. have as good a government as we have; but, because they iiave it not, do not hate them. I was really very happy to pereetve that you were hissed for this sentiment at the county meeting. I was happy to perceive it, because it was a sign, that the people tHi England were coming to their senses upon this, the most imports wit el* all subjects. Why could you not have expressed your* self in terms less hostile \o every generous and humane Seeling ? I confess that Mr. Hunt's motion, though, if he thought it /me, he was right in making it, might fairly be objected to by any one who thought differently. But you might have reprobated the endeavour to describe England as not free^ (if you regarded her as being free,) without saying that you hated HHm Americans. Thb it was that shocked the meeting; and, accordingly, it hooted yon, as appears from the report, as published even by the Times newspaper. Every effwt ought now to be made to produce re- conciliation with America; and you appear to have done all that you were able to do to perpetuate the animosities engendered by the war. Mr. Dickenson managed his opposition to the motion more adroitly. He observed, th it (he holy war powers, now in congress at Vienna, were, <' he had conaiderable reason to be. lieve,'* engaged in an effort to unrivet the chains of the African slave ; and, therefore, he could not consent to any motion that might seem to glance against their people being free. So Mr. DicKEN^soN concluded, it seems, that, if the " sacred causes- powers should settle upon some general prohibition i^aiost the increase of slaves in the ff^est- Indies, there cannot possibly re« main any thing like slavery in Russia, Prussia, Poland, Germany, Bohemia, Transylvania, Sclavonia, Italy, Spain, or Portugal. I should like to have heard the chain of argument, through which this member for Somerset arrived at such a conclusion from such premises. I suppose that it must have been something in this way : That the " sacred cause*' powers are all perfectly sincere in their professions ; that, being so, it is impossible to be* lieve, that they would show so much anxiety for the freeing of the Africans, while they held their own subjects in slavery ; and that, thereforet it is impossible to believe, that the people of Rua* sia, Germany, and Hungary, are not all perfectly free. I dare say that Mr. Dickenson said a great deal more upon the subject, and produced/acrs as well as arguments to prove that Mr. Hvnv's motion was an unjust attack upon those powers ; and I confess that it would be a great treat to me to see thaac facts upon paper. CI h B \ ■ I a t\ I 1 i littm of mUiam CobbeU, Eiq, iPw^Ww •)■ ' AMBBICA AND ALGIEBS. re- " As the war which has now begun between the *' d&nocratic rtUer»'* of Ameriest and the '< regular government^' of AJ- giersi may lead to important consequences, it is proper to insert. here the grounds of this war, as far as we can come at them* We have the American oflScial accounts only. America has a tell-tale sort of government It has no state secrets. It blabs out the proceedings in negotiations, while the negotiators are fitiU assembled. Not so the regular government of Algiers, which is one of the << ancient and venerable inatitutiona" which the Bostonian noblesse so much admire ; one of the " gems in the crown of ancient glory," of which Mr. Chateaubriand speaks to feelingly, and so foolishly ; one of the links in the chain of the *' social system" which has recently been under the ham- mers of so many able artisans at Vienna. The regular govern- ment of Algiers does not make any prefaces to war. It observes a dignified silence tUl it has actually begun and made some prO' gress in the nar ! till it has made a good haul of the enemy's ships, before he knows that he is looked upon as an enemy. This is the practice of the regular government ; the '* ancient and venerable institution in Algiers." I shall now insert, first, an account of the grounds of war from the National Inielligen- cert published at Washington ; next, the report of congress on the subject ; and, last, the act of congress declaring war against Algiers. For the reader will observe, that, in the irregular go- vernment of America, war cannot be declared by the chief ma- gistrate, without the consent of the people's real representatives. I reserve a few remarks to follow the documents. There is one circumstance connected with this Algerine war, which I think worthy of particular notice ; and that is, this regu-' lar government began, it appears, its depredations on the Ame- ricans, just as the latter were entering upon war with US ! Som« of our modest and honourable gentlemen ; some of our most honourable men, have called America an assassin, because she made war against us while we were at war against Napoleon. What will they say now of the venerable head of this African state ? The same lionourable worthies have said, that because America went to war with us while we had to fight Napoleon, she was the slave of Napoleon. But I hope they will not apply this reasoning to the present war between America and Algiers ; I fervently hope, that no one wUI pretend, that, because Algiers went to war with America, while America had to fight with us, Algiers was the slave of Ehngland ! A« to the resUit of the war, I nF i SSMT Letters of William Cohbetty Eiq. hare no doubt that the dey will not have to rejoice mach at tH^ flucceis of his undertaking. A dry blow, instead of milliont pf dollars, are likely to be his portion. As an Englishman, I must wish that the Algerines may be beaten by those who have, unfortunately, so often beaten my own countrymen. The Tint ES newspaper has told us, that it is nispeeted ih^t the Algerine war is, with America, a PRETEXT for increaeing her navy. Indeed, doctor ! and in what civilian have you dis- covered that America is restrained from augmenting her ntlvy at her pleasure ? What need has she of pretexts ? I know, indeed, that, amongst your other follies, you did, during last summer, in- sist upon it, that, in making peace with America, she should, at least, be compelled \o stipalaienot to have any ships of war 5e- yond a certain nwmher. But (he stipulation was not obtained ; and, now, instead of big menaces, you throw out your snspectinga for the cogitations of the wise John Bull. Away, driveller ! and await a similar fate to your predictions as to the taking of Nev- O"**' ns. i\ > TTERACV FUND AND WASHINGTON BENEVOLENT SOCIETY. I HATB obarrveu that, year after year, this institution becomes mere like a common charity concern. A parcel of lords, and other men of purse, tak& the chairy and take the lead. This last meeting was, I see, presided over by the duke of Kentt in the same way as the Lancaster school meetings, and other meetings for the assistance of the poor and miserable. The consequence of this must be, that the poor deviPs politics will serve as the measure of the bounty he is to receive. The original design of this fund must be totally overlooked. The design, I believe, was, to prtivent autliors from selling their pens ; whereas, now, I should suppose the principal design to be to purchase the pens of utsthoTBj or to keep alive poor slaves whose works are well meant towards their patrons, but destitute of the talent ne(;eij8ary to make them sell. I observed, that the '^founder's** health was drank, and that the ''^ founder^* Mr. David Williams, was not named,^ Mr. David Williams wrote some excellent political tracts in support of the principles oi freedom ; he also translated some of the works of Voltaire on the subject of religion ; never did he expect that this institution would tumble into such hands as have now got hold of it. The truth is, that the scheme was a very ' * He was the author of Z«<«on« (q a Young Prince, \vluch bttre been erroneously attributed to Edmuud Buikc. i^M Ldttra of William CoblfeU, Eiq, m \\: good one. Its object and its tendency was to encourage literary nuiriij and to make authors honest and independent ; but it haa. itvir manifestly been converted into a sort of poor-list for decayed lUerary hacks. They tell the world that they do not publish the namM of the parties who receive charity. They are very wise Vf> thia. Sot the public wQuld soon see what the real object of the Alpd was, if they could see the names of the persons relieved* In sliort, this,, like almost every other "charily" as they ara called, is neither more nor less than an adjunct of ihe govern' m^ntf or, rather, of the system. What jacobin, or jacobin s wife, {unless she first betrayed her husband,) was ever relieved by any q^ these societies ? They are kept up for the purpose of Aie^tn^ the needy in good humour, or of rewarding faithful, decayed 9lq>ve*, Here the man who has paid a fortune in taxes oiten cotties, cap in hand, and receives back the means of getting a 4inner. tt k curious to observe, that the aristocratic faction in Ame- rica nave i^esorted to a trick of this sort. They set up, some few years ago, a society, which they called the *'WA8HiKOTOi«r Benbvolent Society,'* which, it appears, has branched out all over the country. The object of this trick was to collect little groupes of the most needy and mean-spirited part of the people, and, by the means of donations in money, clothes, books^ and me- dical aid, to attach them to the aspiring rich, and thus to found a iort of AFFibiAVioN t^ttinst the republican government. The name of Washingtoit was taken for the purpose ofde- ceptiont and, as a party word, opnosed to the name of Frankliit, JcfFERsov, or Madisok, who were thus to be held up as having deviated from the principles of the man to whom American grati- tude has given what, perhaps, American wisdom and justice would lunre given largely, but certainly with a less prodigal hand. , Availing themselves of this amiable weakness, these crafty enemies of their country's freedom have been working up the peo- ple^ere and titer e, by the means of these societies^ to an opposi- tion to the government. They hold their stated meetings as our " charities" do. They make speeches, compliment one another^ extol the virtues of Washington, who, though one of the fir^t of patriots, never was fool enough to bestow his money in the making ~ paupers. Shut out of the legislative assemblies by the people's c: voice, they harangue at these meetings, and thus continue to keep themselves in wind. Silly as the thing is, howeve5', in itself, J would have the Americans be upon their guard against it. I^ is aspiring aristocracy in its mo»t alluring guise ; it is imposture of the most dangerous kind. It tends to the creating oi pauperism ; to the forming of a class in the community who have no interest in supporting the rights and liberties of the nation,, and. who aie to be bought aod sold lik« cattle. These societies ought to bo si] m- m m LtUers of William Cohhdlt Esq. resolutelj attacked and exposed. A little matter would break them up amongst a sensible people. I wish I could show the people of America the effects of pauperism in England ; 1 wish I could make them see the degradation which it has brought upon the land of their forefathers — there would need nothing more. [CoiBKTT is very mueh deceiTciI, if he suppose! that this society is either r** speoted or respectable ; if he had seen it marohf on the 4th instant, with all the advantages which a festive daj could give it, when every hand was suspended firom labour, and when those who abhorred independence, and sickened at the eelebht- tion, were compelled, by the force of public sentiment, to appear pleased, while tiieir hearts grieved ; had he seen the Peter Wasliingtons un that day, where every notorious tory and the underlings of English agency looked for the only solave they tiould find in the congenial feeling of hatred to free and equal government, in that -wretched olub— Cobbett would have seen many of hi* ovn abettort, a few of those "otho torote for his Porcupine, some who, during the war, gave, as public toasts, the " iratuportahon of Madison to Klba ;" a number of poor boys in their iiunday eoais ; a few decent looking men, among whom the wreck of the world had made havock, and y/hoBt poverty, and not their tnll, placed them there, as the only mode by which cettain Kinds of business dependent en Englidi agency can be obtained. This society is perfectly harmless, in a social and a political light ; for, very fortu« nateky, it is in bamls which always have been distinguished moce for blind zeal than judgment, and whose folly renders it ndious, even among the most respectable and sedate of the federalists, who are repressed by decorum from participating in a scheme which was set out apon a suggestion of uie English minister, Jackson, com- meneed at the same point as the Hartford convention, and had in view the same ebject i which in its by-laws betrayed the cloven foot of Kngland, by pursuing the same system as Uaton procured to be set on foot in ir97— 8, and which (^obbett himself encouraged — the determination not to employ in any buaineit, nor to deal in any trmntactiong, nor to countenance in public or private, any citizen who did not recognise the Washington Benevolent Society — the mode by which England hai diridedj and distracted, and ruined many nations.] Jlurerq^. To the Earl of Liverpool — on the part which America is likelif to take in a war between England and France^ My Lord, From several parts of America I have received thanks for my letters to your lordship on the subject of the American war. The people in America think, or, at least, many of them think, that those letters had great weight in producing the peace of Ghent, than which you and your coHeagues never adopted any measure more wise, nor in better time. Yet, you have never thanked me for my advice. You, to whom the peace was much more necessary than to Mr. Madison, have never acknowledged your obligations to me — ^you have appeared to be sulky about all, though I taught yon so exactly what (o do, in order to avoid the great evils which were coming upon you from all quarters. The consequences of the American war were foretold by me nearly two years before the war began. I told you that you would have war, if you persevered in seizing men on board of American ships on the high seas. You did persevere, and you had war. I tojd you that the Americans would beat yon in fighting, if you continued the war for two years. You coatinued the war^ and Lellers of William Cobbett, Esq, 929 likelif tliey did beat you. I told you that you would never have peace if you demanded any concession from America. Tou inshted on great concessiona on her part aa a sine qtia non of peace ; and, after three months more, you made peace by giving up every thing, not excepting the sine qua non itself. In short, you ex- pended fifty millions of money, and lost, I dare say, thirty thou- nand men, in accomplishing nothing, except creating a navy in America, causing her manufactures to flourish, and implanting in the hearts of Americans, for ages, a hatred of the £ngliak government. I remind you of these things, in order to bespeak your atten- tion on the present subject. I shall here deal in prophecies again; and shall not be at nil afraid of proving, in the end, not to have been a false prophet. You appear to me now to be in a very fair way of adding another six hundred millions to our debt, and of bringing the. guinea up to forty shillings, instead of twenty-eight shillings, at which point it is now arrived. I wish to prevent this ; and if I do not succeed, I shall, at any rate, have these pages to refer to, when the mischief kas taken place, and when few beside myself will be able to say thait they did all in their power to prevent it. lam of opinion, that France alone is now, as she wasio 1793, more than a match for the coalition against her. But I am fur- ther of opinion, that, before the war against her be six months old, you mill find America taking apart in it, unless you absolutely abstain from every thing that can be construed into a violation of neutral maritime rights. War, or peace, with America, will depend upon the opinions of the peop^ in that country. The people there are really and truly represented in the congress. There are no vile sfuitn elections in the United States. That which the people wills, will be done. The Americans are a sensible people ; they all read from a press which is realli/ free ; they discuss all poli- tical matters freely ; they love peace; they would prefer peace ; they would make some sacrifices to peace ; but they will never hesitate a moment is preferring war to slavery or de- pendence. Now, then, what is likely 4o be the view which the Amerieana will take of the present scene in Europe 1 And what are likely io be their feelings with regard to what is ; that, so far from attacking us in the dark, she gave us notice, for yean beforehand, that she would repel, by force, our sei/otre of her seamen, unless we ceased that practice. What, then, could be meant by this charge of assassin-Itke conduct T Reallji, we seem to ?i 43 IHi 33& Utters oj William Cobhelt, Est^. To the Earl of Liverpool — on the political effects produced in . America by the peace of Ghent. ' Mtf Lord, .^ It was frequently observed by me, in former letters^ which I had the honour to address to your lordship, during the war with America, that if you were, at last, as I foretold you would be, compelled to make peace without humbling America, and, indeed, withi)ut subduing her, or nearly subduiiip; her, the result would be honourable to her, seeing that she would, in a war iingle*haaded against England, have succeeded in defending her- 9elf. It was clear, that when once the contest became a single combcU, to defend herself must be to her triumph, and to us de- feat. And if she came out of the war without any, even the smallest concession, her triumph over us must raise her greatly in the estimation of her own people, and of all the world. She did come out of the war in this way ; and the natural conse* quences have followed. I do not know that I have before noticed the fact in pribt, but it is now time that I should ; I mean the curious fact relative to the proclamation of peace with America. We know that peace with any power is usually proclaimed by HERALDS, who, starting at St. Jamea' Palace, go into the city, with a grand dis- play of armorial ensigns, accompanied by troops in gay at- tire, and by bands of martial music, stopping, from time to time, to read the king's proclamation of the peace. This was done at the peace of Amiens, and at the peace cf Paris, Indeed, it is the usual way in which the cessation of war is proclaimed. ^ow, then, how was the peace with America proclaimed ? There was no procession at all ; there was nothing of the usual ceremony. But the Couhier newspaper, and, I believe, that paper only, informed the public, that " peace with America was proclaimed today, by reading tlu Proclamation, iniAe USUAL WAY, at the door of the ^e at WhUehalV This was all, and I will be bound, that even the people passing in the street did not know what it was that was reading. This is what the CouRiKB calls the usual \t^y of proclaiming peace ! There was no iUuminations j no firing of guns ; no ringing of bells ; no de- monstration of joy. In short, the country which had been so eager for the war, and so unanimous for its prosecution, seemed not at all to regret that it never knew the exact period when peace returned. It felt ashamed of the result of the war, and was glad to be told nothing at all about it. But, in America ! There the full force of public feeling was made manifest. The country resounded from New-Orleans to Lelters qf WiUiam CobbeU, Esq. m (he utmost borders of the lakes ; from the orange grovei to the wheat lands buried four feet deep in snow, was heard the voice of joj, the boast of success, the shout of victorj. I, who had alT^ays felt anxious for the freedom of Aooerica; I, whose pre- didtions have been so completely fulfilled in tiM result of this contest ; even I, cannot keep down all feeling of mortification at these demonstrations of triumph, related in the American prints now before me. Even in me, the Englishman so far gets the bet< ter of ail other feelings and consideration. What, then, must be the feelings of tbone, my lord, who urged onf and who pro^f cuted that fatal war ? An American paper now before me, the Boston " Yankee" of the 9th of December last, gives an account, copied from our London papers, of our Jubilee last summer, when "oldBLu- CHB&" was so squeezed and hugged, and had his jaws so nastily licked over bj the filthy women, who were called " ladies.*' This Yankee calls it " Jolm Bull's great natiotial jubilee ;" and, I assure you, the famous victory gained by the naval force of England over the American fleet on the Serpentine River is not forgotten ! But the editor of the Yankee has made a mistake. He thought it was the Thames on which that memorable battle was fought. Not so, good Mr. Yankee. The Serpentine River, as it is called, is a little winding lake in Hyde Park, about the width of a large duck pond, and is fed by a little stream, or^ rather, gutler, and empties itself by the means of another gutter at the other end. It was this quality of lake thai' madn the scene so very apt. These are mortifying recollections, my lord ; and I do not know that they will be rendered less so to you by the addition of the reflection, that, if you had followed my advice, there never would have been any ground fur them. The political "^fTects in America of ^such ^ peace must be won- derful. Indeed, they evidently are so. The men who, in the New- England states, were forming open combinations against Mr. Madison, are, as I told you they would be, covered with that sort of disgrace, that deep disgrace, which defeated malice al- ways brings upon its head. They appear, from all I can gather, to have become the butt of ridicule, after having long been the object of serious censure. These men are suspected of treason- able views and acts. At any rate, they are chargeable with a real attempt to destroy the liberties of their country, in revenge for their rejection by the people. They were debated in their grasp at the supreme powers of the union, and they have en* deavoured to do as the baboon is said to have done with the fair lady ; that is, destroy that which they could not possess. Mr. PicKBRiNu, to whom the Times newspaner looked up as the " hangiiutn and 8n,QC£S$qr pf Mx- Madison," now tall^s lite "-sjr-v dtta Letters of fVilliam Cobbtilj Esq, a very hearty repubKcan ; but the poor gentleman ieems to know very little of what is going on here. He says, that you made peace because so tmmy petitions mere poured in agatnat eonti* Humg the war; and your lordship knuws, that not one auch peti- tion was poured in. He says, that the failure at New-Orleans will put you otU of place. Poor gentleman ! how little, how very little does he know about you ! He says, that tlte opposition have clamoured for peace. It was the opposition who urged ou the war, and only found fault with you for not doing the Yankees more mischief than you did. Yet this, this is one of them« to whom we have looked as capable of overthrowing Mr. Madison \ This is one of the men who was to *< retmite the colonies to the parent state !" It i& very true, I acknowledge, that a dangerous faction has arisen in the republic. I see very clearly, that wealth has intro- duced a taste for what are called honours. Vanity is making a desperate effort to decorate men with titles. The /an; forbids it ; but vanity is at open war with law. The germ of aristocracy, which was discovered in the New-England states, and, in a few instances, in some of the others, at the end of the war of inde- pendence, has grown out now to full view. There are squires and honourables in abundance* There are the " honourable the governor ;^' " his lionour the judge ;'* and so on. These men will soon begin to regret that they have no one to give them per- manent titles ; that they have no "fountain of honour." That which men regret the want of, they endeavour to obtain, when- ever an occasion offers. The priests of New*England appear to be working hard to procure something in the way of an estab- lishment. Hence the joy of both these at the restoration of the Bourbons, the old French Noblesse, the Pope, and the Jesuits ; and, hence, they will, I venture to predict, be as abusive of Na- poleon, Carnot, Fouche, Redoerer, and Merlin, as is our Times newspapers. In the mean while, however, the people are sound republicans ; and it will take some years to overset their government, though the manners and tastes of many may be corrupted. The follow- ing letters, which I have received from America, will show you that the war, and especially the peace^ have produced a great change in that country. They will also show you, that, long ago, I had hit upon the true nail, and that yon ought to have paid attention to me sooner than you did. The newspapers from America breathe a spirit of resentment, which it should be our object to allay, if possible ; but, really, the language of our pros- tituted press was such, that, added to the *^ character of the war,*' it is almost impossible that reconciliation should take place during an age to coiae* Ldters'of WiUiam CohheiU Esq. d4t Before I conclude, I beg leave to call your lordshipV attention to the statements in thci American papers, relative to ow treat- fnmt of the American prisoners of war ; also to call your atten- tion to certain intercepted letters of our officers, relative to pluti- der >* and further, to call your attention to their charges relative to the parole given by Oeh. Packenham, when he was about to assault, and to take, as he expected, New-Orleans. I dare not copy these* Newgate is not so pleasant as Botley. But still I dp most anxiously wish to see these papers published here, be- cause they might then be met by denial and disproof, if not true. This is a serious matter, my lord. If we dare not publish here, they dare do it in America ; and there it is that the effect will be produced injurious to us. I dare say, that long before this will reach the press, all these charges^ all these horrid narratives, mill /tave been collected in America, published in a permanent sliape, and, perhaps, translated into French* Thus will they be read by all the civilized world, the people of England ex- cepted ; but, thus have I done my duty in pointing these things ^ut to your lordship, which is all that I dare do in this case. I am, &c. &c. , William CoBBifx. BoUe7, S9th May, 1815. TO COBBESPONDBNTS IN THE U. STA.TES OF AMERICA. I have, within these few days, had tendered to me, through the post, a small parcel from America, with " newspapers" written on it. This parcel had, as appears by the post mark, been sent from Liverpool to London, and from London 1o Botley. The charge on it was nine shillings and sixpence sterling ; that is to say, however, in our paper money, being about, at this time, a dol- lar and a half. I did not take the parcel, of course, much as I wished to see its contents. From this account, it will be per- ceived, that unless parcels of newspapers, coming from America, be actually conveyed by the bearer of them, either to me, at Bot- ley, (which can seldom happen,) or to London, the object in send- ing them must be defeated ; for a file of daily papers, for only one nionth, sent me by post from any out port, would coat, at least, the price of a good fat hog. I remember one parcel which came to me, charged with nine pounds some odd shillings of postage, which is now the price of a hog of seventeen score weight. As I am very desirous to receive, frequently, papers from America ; and as the papers in that country are not, as ours are, loaded with a tax equal to more than one half of the retail price, I will pqij>t out the manner in which they niay bp sent to 342 Letters of William Cobbtitt Esq. me. The parcel should be addressed to me, by name, ♦* to the care of the publisher of CobbetVs Weekly Political Register, London." But it ought, if the vessel go to London, to be carried bj the master or mate, or by some careful person ; and if the ves- sel prrive at some out port, the parcel, with the same direction on it, should be carried to some office, whence a London coach de- parts. There it should be delivered, and the bearer should see it booked as we call it. By these means American papers will reach me with very little trouble, and at an expense of which I should think nothing. All single letters from America may be addressed to me at Bolley, near Southampton, and be put, at once, into any post office in this country. The hirelings, who conduct nine tenths of the newspapers in London, have all possi- hie facilities in receiving American newspapers. But they pub- lish from them that only which suits their purpose. Their object is to mislead the people here ; or, to keep them in the dark ; and they cull out every passage calculated to answer the end. Be- sides, there are very few papers (the National Intelligencer ex- cepted) which are sent to England, except the papers called /e- dcral. The persons who send these papers, if not English by birth, are English by connexion. Thus we see only one side of the picture ; and hence it was, that malignant and beastly as is the editor of the Times newspaper, for instance, the fellow really might be deceived himself by the cuckoo clamour of the aris- tocratical American newspapers ; but, hence, though I could get a sight of none but the same sort of papers, / mas not deceived, because I had had that experience which enabled me to put a proper value upon what I saw in these papers. It is of great con- sequence to the cause of truth and freedom, that the republican papers should come to us from America, and that other republican works should also reach us ; for it is from this island that opi- . nions and facts go forth to produce impressions on the minds of the world. Bound up as our press is, we, by one means or other, contrive to get a great deal into circulation. We are nearer the grand scenes of action than you are ; and if you wish your prin- ciples and your example to have their due and speedy effect, we must be the principal vehicle of them. Some one at Philadelphia Xiias recently sent me a parcel of American papers, received at Philadelphia from other places, from which I perceive, that my letters to Lord Liverpool have been republished in all parts of the republic, from Boston to Savannah, from Philadelphia to Pitts- burgh. Flattering as this is to my self love, it is much more gratify- ing to me as a proof of the powers of the press, and as the founda- tion of a rational hope, that the day is not distant when tyranny, wherever it may exist, will fall beneath those powers. Letter VI. to the earl of Liverpool, I wrote, I remember, in a room in a farm house, one morning when I was detained by rain. I might have Ldtm of WiUiamCobbtU, E»q, 343 thought it; but, certaiolj, I had not then the most dittaot ideK that what I was then writing would bo quickly come back to me in another print, after having beeu read on the banks of the Ohio and those of the Missiasippi. This single fact ; the sight of only one such print, is to me irore than a compensation for all that I have suffered in the cause of truth and freedom. Bat it iaof far greater importance as a stimulant to future ex« ertion, and as suggesting additional care in planning and executing* But why should not the friends of freedom co«operate? We see bow firmly bound together its enemies are ; bow they, for the fur* therance of their grand object, mutually sacrifice all their prejudi« ces, and even their petty conflicting interests. You have heard the saints of Hartford rejoice at the restoration of the pope. The Uoly Father has embraced the Dey of Algiers, who calls him a Christian dog. Why should not we aid each other ? You are better oft' than we are. You have free presses in every seaport i your seapoi'ts are numerous ; your masters of vessels have a di- rect communication with you ; you can easily come at all that we publish. While your continent, and ail its presses and literary productions, are shut from us by hundreds of obstacles of which you have no idea, our enemies have their regular correspondents, their communications always gipen ; they know here all that is pass- ing in your country; while we are wholly in the dark; while we are deprived of the use of all those powerful weapons, which your unrestrained press would put bto ouf hands. I hope that these considerations will be sufficient to. induce some one of you at least, to forward to me, in the manner above pointed out, such papers and other publications, as are likely to be of benefit to the cause of truth and freedom, and of which you can want no assu- rance of my will, at any rate, to make the best possible use. America now begins to make a great figure in the world ; but her example, which, if made universally known, would be of more weight than her military or naval prowess, is, from the causes above stated, of comparatively little service. I take this op-t portunity of expressing my best wishes to Mr. Mathew Ca- H£v, of Philadelphia, for a very excellent paoiphlet, which he has had the goodness to send me, entitled, " A Calm Address tct the People of the Eastern StateSt on the subject of the Repre- sentation of Slaves ; the. Representation in the Senate ; and tht hostility to commerce ascribed to the Southern States," — I should be obliged to some one, to send me any work or works, giving an account of the expenses of the government, and fdate guvernt mentSf oi" America; also of her shipping, commerce, debts, taxes, &c. &.C. And if Mr. Carey, or some other person equally ca- pable, would spend a few hours in giving me an account of the If H i ' i; 344 LetUrs of WUlitan, Cohbdtt ksq. 8 rices of flrovUiotu and labour, I should deem it a particular iTour. These may have changed since I left America. Wm. Godbett. P. S. Since writing the above, I have (22d May) received from some friend in Philadelphia, a small file of Auroras^ con- taining the « EXPOSITION of the CAUSES and CHA- RACTER of the War." This paper, it appears, is qffUial, nnd mn ready {or official promulgation, ju9t at the time when the news of the peace arrived. I never read so able a paper ; never one calculated to produce so great an impression. It is an invduable document for history ; a noble monument of the power ef the human mind. If our government have received this pa> per, and if they will but read it carefully, they will, I am sure, clearly see, that any attempt either to delude, subdue, or check the rise of America, must fail of success. The paper would fill about four whole Registers, perhaps. But, though I cannot iiuert itf it will be of great use to me ; and I beg the sender to accept of my best thanks. Botley, near SouUianpton, May 20, 1815. To Lord Grenvt7/e— on the Constitutions of England, Ameri- cu, and France. My Lord, In the published report of your speech of the 24th of hst month, on the subject of the war against France, we read the following passage : ** As to new constitutions, he (Lord O.) was firmly of opinion, that a good constitution could only be formed by the adoption of remedies, from time to time, under the cir- cumstances which required them. The only instance of except tion mentioned was that of America : but that did not apply. The founders of that constitution acted with great wisdom. It was framed so as to produce as little change as possible in the existing laws and manners under the altered form of government, which, though a republic, was constructed as nearly as the difference would admit, on the MONARCHICAL form of OUR OWN CONSTITUTION." This passage, my lord, owing, I dare say, to the want of ac* curacy in the reporter, is not so clear, or so correct, as one might have wished ; but its meaning evidently is, that constitutions of government cannot be well formed all at once ; that the American constitution of government bears a very near reMmblance to our own ; and (taking in the context) that the constitution of govern- ment now adopting, or settling, in France, is a bad constitution ov system. ? Letters of William Cobbett, Esq, 90 I As to the Brat of these propoailions: that a constitution cannot be well made all at once, it is of little consequence as to the ub< ject which I have in view ; for the French have been more than *25 years forming their constitution; and, however moriifving it may be to some people, the laws of France, even while the Bourbons were on the throne last year, were, for the gretUer part, laws passed by the diflferent niUional oBsemblieSf or, as B0(ue would call them, the jacobins* It is a very great mistake to suppose that Napoleon, either in his conslitution or his code, began anew. He did little more than arrange, classify, reduce to order, and provide for enforcing the l^ws, under whatever name, passed by the different assemblies ; and this was the coJe which the Bourbons promised to adhere to and support. So that the constitution of France, as it now stands, has been the work of 26 years, not only of sludyt but of experience* the alleged resemblance between the E^nglish and American governments which is the most interesting object of examination at present ; though it wilt, before I conclude, be necessary to see a little what resemblance that of France bears to each of the former governments. I take your lordship to mean, of course, that there is a very near resemblance between the English and American governments as they really are in opera* Hon, Not as they are to be found in books written about con* stitutions. What Montesquieu, and De Lolme, and Blackstone, and Paley, and a long list of grave political romance writers have published upon the subject, we will leave wholly out of the question. iTour lordship was talking, and so will f talk, of things AS THEY ARE, and not as they ought to be ; or as they are, from parrot like habit, said to be. And here, my lord, I beg leave, once for all, to state, that I am offering no opinions of my own upon this subject. Your lordship, according to the pub^ lished report, says, that there is a near resemblance between the English and American governments. This fact I deny ; but that is all. I do not say that the American government is better than ours ; nor do I say that it is worse. I only say that it does not resemble ours. Which is the best and which is the worst I leave to the decision of the reader, in whatever country he Biay live. But, before I enter on my proofe of the negative of this, your lordship's proposition, permit me to observe, for a moment, on the desire which is so often discovered in this country, to induce ether nations to adopt governments like our own. No sooner do we hear of a change of government in any country, than we- 44 >rf\\, M Md UUer$ qf William Cobbetl, Esq. begin urging the people of such country to adopt a government like ours. The newspaper people, the Walters and Perrya, and the like, are everlastingly telling (be French that they ought to come as nearly as possible \o out admirable mixed government. Those cunning loons, the Edinburgh Reviewers, chant the same litanies in every succeeding number. They despair of the French, because they reject our excellent model of government ; and they predict that the American syst^^m cannot endure long, because it has none of those bodies of nobles ur large proprie- tors, who are the best giiardians o( ihe people's rights, standing, as the latter do, between the people and the prince ! This was their talk, indeed, before your lordship and other great noblemen joined the ministers in support of the war. What these place- hunting critics will say now is a great deal more than 1 am able to guess. Thus, too, it was, that Burke ranted and rayed. The French* according to him, ought to have been -half put to death, because they despised the *' admirable** mixed govern' ment of England. How he ran on; what borabastical balderdash he published upon this subject, your lordship knows as well as I ; and you, doubtless, remember, that when answered by Paine^ instead of attempting reply, he pointed out the work of his antagonist to be replied to by the attorney general ! Now, my lord, what can be the real cause of all this anxiety to get other nations to adopt our own sort of government ? It is not the usual practice of the world to be so eager to induce others to share in one's happiness. If a man, by any accident, finds a parcel of money in a field or a wood, does he run away to bring his neighbours, or even his cousins or brothers, to enter into a search with him ? Did we ever hear of a tradesman, who had a set of good customers, en- deavour to introduce persons of the same trade to them ? Did ever handsome woman try to make any other woman look as handsome as herself, even though that other were her sister, nay, her daughter ? If an individual make a valuable discovery, so far is he from communicating it to the world, that he, if he can, will obtain a patent for it, and thereby the right of punishing who- ever attempts even to imitate his wares. What, then, can be the cause of our anxiety to make other nations partakers of the bless* ings of our government ? We take special care to keep from them all we can in the way of commerce. We have a law for cncoinfgr ment of our own navigation, to the discouragement of * lat ol all other countries. We have laws to prevent " j «ng to other countries, machines to facilitate the making c We have laws to prohibit the carrying of the | colonies to other countries, until it has been brought have lavrs to preveiif the exportation of live sheep, hh jlher countries should get our breeds. We have laws to punish itrli' ifactures. uce of our We here Letters of William Cohbettt Esq, 347 ig to tures. our We iher urli' sans and manufacturers who attempt to leave this country, and alio to punish the masters of the vessels in which thej are at- tempting to escape ; the avowed object of which laws is to pre- vent other countries from arriving at our state of perfection in manufactures and arts. How is it, then, my lord, that we are BO generous as to our political passtssions ? Generous, did I say ? Nay, obtrusive and impertinent. We are not only ten- dering them with both hands at once ; but we really ihru'd them upon the world ; and, if any nation be so resolutely delicate as to refuse to receive them, let that nation look to itself! ** Will you give me a penny V* said Dilworth's beggar fo thr Eriest. " No." " Will you, for the love of Christ, give me a alf-penny, then, to keep me fro(n starving ?*' " No.'* " Will you, then, give one farthing ?" " No." " Pray, then, since I must die with hunger, give me your blessingt reverend father." " Kneel down, my dear son, and receive it." " No," said the beggar, " for if it were worth but one single farthing you would not give it me ; so you may e'en keep your blesBing to your- self." But we greatly surpass the priest ; for while we withhold commerce, navigatioriy manufudures^ arlsy arliaanSf manufac- turers, breed of animals, &c. &c. we not only offer our bksS' ing, but we abuse those who reject it ; and there are those amongst us who scruple not to say, that the nation which has the insolence to refuse to share in our political happiness, ought to feel the force of our arms. To what, then, fairly shall I as- cribe this desire to induce other nations to adopt our sort of go- vernment? It is notorious, that men seek for companions in mi- sery and disgrace. Never was (here a bankrupt who did not wish to make his appearance in a copious gazette. 1 lie coward looks bold when he has fled amongst a crowd. The country girls, who anticipate the connubial tie, always observe, and very truly, that they are not tlie first, and shall not be the last, it is said, that persons infected with the plague feel a pleasure in communicating it to others. To ascribe to a motive like any of these our desire to extend our sort of government to other na- tions would be shocking indeed. Yet, lest we should expose our- selves to the imputation, I think it would be best for ua to be si- lent upon the subject ; or, at least, where nations decline to adopt our system, to refrain from expressing any resentment against them on that account. John Bull's may be the best governifient in the whole world ; it may be very laudable in him, very disin- terested, very humane, extraordinarily generou^, to urge other nations to partake in his blessings. He may Utment the blind- ness, or the obstinacy, or the perverseness of th^ nations who refuse to accept of his ofier. But why should he be angry with them ? Why should he be in a rage with them? Why "should he qur.rrel with them on that account ? " 348 Letters of William Cobhett, Esq, n We will now, if your lordship pleases, come to the resent-' blance between the English and (he American governments. They are both called governments^ to be sure ; and so are the kites and pheasants called birds ; but assuredly, though I pretend not to say wljich is Ihe best, or which is the worst, they resemble each other no more than do these two descriptions of the fea- thered race. To substantiate this assertion, I shall take the ma- terial points in the two cases, and state them in opposite co- lumns, that the contrast may at once strike every eye. ENGLISH GOVERNiMENT. A king, haTiiig the sovereign power settled on his family by hereditary de- ■cent. His heir may be an old man or wpman, a boy or a girl. The king s civil lists amount to more than Jour millions, of dollars annually, or 1,000,OOU of pounds sterling, beside the allowances to the royal children, queen, 8:c &c. amounting to nearly 400,000 pounda more. The Icing, luithotu the consent of any part of the legislature, makes treaties, and' even treaties uf aubsidy, «gt'eeing to par money to foreign powers, lie ap- points ambassadors, public ministers, con- •uls, judges, and aU other officers what- ever. The king can do no -wrong. His per- ■on is BacredwaA inTioUble. The king can declare -war, and make peace, without any body's consent. The king grants pensions to whom he chooses under 6,000 dollars a year. He has more thun 100,000 iiounds a year placed at his disposal frr secret services, of which no particular account is ever rendered, even to the parliament. The HOUSE OP PEERS hold their seats by Itereditary right ; but the king may mtike new peers whenever he chooses. They may be old or young, present or absent, abroad or at home. The H<)USE OF COMMONS con- sist-j of county members and city borough members. JJe the county great or small, it sends two members — and, as to the cities and boronifhs, London and West- minster, which contain about fMV.OOO persona, sends six members, while Old Saruni, Gatton, and rnauy other pUce^ AMEUICAN GOVERNMENT. The chief magistrate is a PRESI. DENT, freely elected by the people evei'y four years, and he must be 35 years of age. The president receives a compensa- tion for his services which cannot be augmented during his presidency, and this compensation is 25,000 dollars, or 6,000 pounda sterling; The president, with the consent of the senate, who are elected by the people, can make treaties, two thirds of th* sena- tors concurriag With the same consent he appoints ambassadors, public minis- tera, consuls, judges, &c. The president may be impeached, and when he is tt'ed in senate the chief justice is to preside. i I e can only be dismissed and disqua- li^dhy t'?t senate i but, beside that, he mny *"■ ..terwards, for the same ofienoe, inultti 7, tried, judged^ and punished!, aoeord.ngto law, like any other criminaL The president cannot declare war. Nor can he and the senate together do it : it is done by the congress f and is an act passed by the representatives of the people. The {>resident can give no pension, nor, even with the consent of the senate, make any grant whatever of the public money— not even to the amount of a dol- lar Every thing- of this sort is done by the congress, conipcising the whole of the rep: esentatives of the people. The SEN\TR consists of two mera* hers from each of the states in the union. They are elected by the state ki^islatur^s, who have been ilcited by the people. They servo for fotir fsix] years. The constitution positively forbids the grant- ing of any tit'e of nobility Every sena- tor is to be not under thirty yenrs of age when elected, and is to be a resident in the state for which he is elected. The HOIJSF. OF REI'liESRNTA- TIVES consists of members from the several states, a mtmber proportioned to Letters of William Cobbett, Esq* 349 SLKGLISH GOVERNMENT. AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. containing not a hundred peraona eacli, send each two members. The members Mre elected tor seven year». Tlie quaiijicutions lor county raem- hers dOVt H ytitkv in land ; and 'UMi. a year ill land for borough members. * The gualijicationa tfvotea»re too va- rious to be lialf described. In counties the fveeholderu only vote, and these do not foim a twentieth part of tlie payers of taxes. A house or a bit of freehold land worth 40 shillings a year gives a vote ; while houses and tands to the amount of thousands a year, if retaining any n amount, gives a right ovote. Of course as the president, tenate, and representatives are all ohoseii from this source, they ar« all leally the representatives of the pet- pie. It is manifestly a government car- ried on by the people, through their d«« legates. ?! m I u i- & u ** That 71 peeranominate influence 105 8S 75 163 *' Tkat 45 Commoners nominate 61 influence Qi " That 91 Commoners nominate infiuence 83 83 57 13a ••ABSTRACT. Members. " That 71 Peers and the Treasury return by nomination and in- fluence 170 '< That 9t Commoners return by nomination and influence 139 <' Total members, returned by pri- vate patronage for England and Wales, exclusive of the forty- five for Scotland. 309 " That in this manner a majority of the entire house is chosen, and are ena- bled, being a majority, to decide all ques- tions in the name of lite whole people of England and Scotland." T^/f the mMstcrs have sexts in one or the other of the houses, and a great num- ber of their secretaries nuiiclerksbeTiAe. In 1808, when an account of this raa'*er .tvas ordered to be ptiatad by the house No person holding an offiae under the governn.ent can be a member of either house : and no one can be appointed to any place, (during the time for which he uas elected,) if such place has bee« r * if! is.) E >• f ii |i In lid !!! 350 LdUrs of WUliam Chbbettt Esq. ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. of eommonti there were 76 peraons in that houie who received, amoagst them, 178,994 poundt sterling a year ot the pub- lic mooey. Wliat was received in this ■way by the peers and their families I have no means of knowing. Buti not only can members of either house enjoy the profits of places or of grants, they can receive appointments and grants while they are members. They frequently take part in voting money to themselves. But there is this aqfeguard, that, in some eases, at least, when a member receives a lucrative appointment, he vacates his Mat, and must, if he continues a mem- ber, be re-elected! It is, however, very mrely that his " constituents" refuse to re-elect him ! Oh ! la belle chose ! The king can dissolve the parliament •mhenever he pleases i and. the parliament has been dissolved, at every change of ministry, for some time past. He can, also, prorogue the house at his pleature. If the lung disapproves of a bill, he rejects it a^ once, without assigning any reasons. The king alone coins money, raises troops, and fits out navies. The privilege of habeas corpus was suspended in England for several years, duimg Pilt's administration, when there was neither rebellion nor invasion. It is treason to compass the death of the kin^ s and this may be by -writing; or talktng, and indirectly as well as ab- rectly. The crime of treason, here, is against the kinff t in America, it is against the United States; that is to say, against the people^ B^ an act ef this king's reign (to last till hta death and> a year longer) it is declared to be high treason to endeavour to overatue the kinff, or either house of parliament, into a change of measures or councils i ^nd, at one time, it was high treason to send to any person in the dominions of France a bag of flour, a flitch of bacon, or a bushel of potatoes. In England, the church establishment receives, in rents and tythes, about an eighth part of the amount of the rental of the whole kingdom. All the bishops, deans, prebends, and the greater part of the beneficed priests, are appointed by the crown. There are test laiva, which AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. created during the time he was In the legislature. The president has no power lo dissolve the congress or either of the houses, nor to adjourn their meetings, unless they disagree upon the subjeet. Nor can he call them together at any but at periods fixed by law, except on extraordinary occasions. If the president does not approve of a bill passed by the ^mo houses, he sends it back, with his objections; but if two thirds of both houses persevere, the bill becomes a law. The congress alone has power to coin money, to raise troops, to build and equip shi|)S. The privilege or writ o£ habeas corpus eannot be suspended, unless when, in case* of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it America has latelv been invaded in several parts, has had her towns burnt and plundered, her coast ravaged and devastated t and yei the habeas corpus was not suspended. Treason consists onfy in levying war against the UNITED STATES, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. " No liw shall be made by oougreis respecting an established bbli- CTO'N, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." No religious test ik required of any man to qualify him for any office. Any man may publish what he pleaseV about religion. No tythes in America. Letters of William Cobbett, Esq, 351 ENGUSH GOVBBNMENT. shut out from political and oiyil privilegea great numbers of the peopA; and men are frequently seferely puoRked, put in feloTu' jaiU, and Jinea. and pilloried into the bargain, for writing, printing, or pub< ■Ishing, their opiniont about religion. The bishoptt have seats in the house of peers. Marriages are not legal unless sanctioned by the priests of the establish- ed church. As to the liberty of SPEECH and of the PUESS, many acts have been pass- ed to abridge both ; but particularly one of the 12th of July, 1799, which suppress- ed all political societies, and all societies for debating and lecturing, except un- der lieenseo from the king's justices of the peace, or police magistrates. Even lodges of the poor childish freemasons were compelled to have a license to meet, and to be regitteredi and, even after this, the kind's justices might order any lodge to be disooniinued ; that is to say, brolken up. The king's justices, in case of disobedience of this law, might punish at once, by a fine of 20 pounds, or three months' imprisonment; or, if the of-, fenders were convicted on indictment, they were to be transported for seven years. Public-house keepers were to lose their licenses if they permittea such meetings at their houses. F^very place for lecturing, debating, or reading news- papers, where money shall be paid, is to be deemed a disorderly house, unless previously licensed. The king's justices were authorized to take the license from any publican ; that is to say, to put an end to his trade, upon receiving informa- tion that seditious or immoral publica- tions were read in his house. As to the PRESS, every printer is, by the same act, compelled to give notice to the clerk of the king's justices, that he keeps a press or presses for printing, and he is to receive a certificate of having given such notice. The justices* clerk is to transmit a copy of tlie notice to the king's secretary of state, in whose office the nameo and places of abode of all the printers, and the number of the presses* &0. &c are all nicely registered. Letter Foundera are to do the same ; and, moreover, they are to keep an account of the types and printing presses that they sell, and are to produce them, whenever required, to any justice of the peace. Then, again, the name and place of abode of the printer must be printed on every paper or book ; and any one issuing forth, dispersing after published, any paper or book, without the name and place of abode of the printer, to be punished by the forfeiture of SO pounds. AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. Marriages are settled under the eye of tlie civil magistrate, if the parties choose. No law can be passed abridging the FREEUOM Of SPEECH, or of the PRESS. 9^3 LeUef 8 of William Cobbeitf Ksq, ENGLISH GOVGUNMBN r. The printer is compelled to keep a copy tit' every thing lie prints ; he is to write 4n it the name and abode of the pi-rson vho employed him to print it, under the penalty of 20 pounds, i-'ci-sous selling or banding about papers may be seized and carried before a justice, to have it deter- mined whether they have been offending the law. Any justice may empower peace officers to search for presses and types HB tuspecta to be illegally used, and to seize them ai 1 the printed papers found As to newspapersi the proprie* tors, printers, and xiubliiihcrs, ,are all compelled to go to the stamp -office and make an affidavit of their being such, and also of their place of abode. They are compelled to deposite one copy of each paper at the offico ; and this copy, with their own affidavits, is all that is called for in proof of their being all guilty of any libel found in the paper. An act was passed on the tSth of De- cember, 179^, making it <2?a/A for any part of the people, above 50 in number, to meet for the purpose of petitioning, unless notice and authority for holding •uch meeting be given to, and obtained from the king's justices The penalty of DEATH, without benefit of clergy, oc- curs no less than nine - times in this act. This act, not to spin out its details, puts all political meetings wholly under the absolute authority of the justices, sheriffs, and other officers ; who can, in some ca- ses, prevent their taking place at all ; and in all cases, put an end to them at their sole discretion. First, a written notice, signed by seven householt goards, s^Tcral palaces, and patks at the public eipiense. People kneel, and kiss the king's hand. * This Mr. Burgo^e has just written a circular letter to his neighbours in Es- sex, calling upon them to spend their laat afdlhnff, if necessary, in a war against the Emperor of France, whom he calTs every thing but an honest man. N. B. Mr. Bur* gOTne has had this place for more than thirty years ! Will he now give it up, Seing that money is so much wanted for is just and uecessary war I ^be whole of the civil aD«en»Mnt of the United States, Prement, Congress, Ambassadors, Miniaten, do not eoit 70,0002. « year. There are no penttona, except mnted by congreia for actual and welflutowD eervices. The American government collects from the people ISt. %d each, a year In taxes, taking In the whole of the popu- lation. The president has none of thew. Nobody ever kneels to the pre«de.&ty or kisses his hand. I' ! ' ■ ; ■ fViJ I I could, my lord, proceed much further were it necessary; but from what we have seen, I think it is plain, that there is no like- oess whatever in iL^; two governmenta. As to that of France, as it is now new modelled, it appears to me to resemble the Ameri- can rather than ours. People in France vote for members of the legislature, upon the principle of representation and taxation going hand in hand. There are no feudal titles or rights in France. The peers are, in fact, no more than eminent citizens, having no great estates attached to their titles and seats. There is, and there is to be, no established religion. The two Chambers in France, like the Congress in America, are forbidden to pass any law re- specting a predominant church. Religious opinions are to be ■-■■ ': V 45 P ' up -■ 35^ haters tf William Cohhttty B»ql free. There are to be no books which may not be frieeiy com- mented on and examined into. There is to be notliing so 8acre4 that reason may not approach it. There are to be no tytkta in France, consequently no beupjices to 1)e8tov* This is a govern* ment certainly very much like that of America. , Ht^ Grattan observed that the French people had exchanged the paradise ' of the Bourbons for the " eternal damnation of a military des^ ' potisra." - May be so ; but they seem resolved not to have feudal tides and courts ; monasteries and tythcs jgabelles, corv6e8| and game laws. May be so ; but it has not been proved. , f. In conclusion^ my lord, give me leave to suggest, that it would be as wise in us not to cry up our sort of governmeiMt so much. If it be better than that of France, why want them to have one like it ? Most of my neighbours are well lenpugh. content if they are but able to get good crops themselves, without thinking much about those of other people. We are always calling the French our enemy, and representing their power as so dangerous to Europe; and why should we then fret ourselves because they will not be happier than they are ? It would certainly be wise to let them alone; for, by evincing such an everlasting anxiety about their form of government, I, am afraid that we shill give rise to a suspicion, (hat it is their form of government, and not the ambition of their chief, that we dread,^ and against whic|| we are about to make war. J am. &,c $cc. Wm. Cobbbtt. :f To Mr. Nilest Proprietor of the Weekly Register, published ell' BaUimoref in the United States of America. Sir, After thanking you for the numbers of your publication, which you have been so good as to send me, I proceed to the subject of this letter, the object of which is to give to the people of the last remaining republic some information, which they inight not be able otherwise to obtain, relative to the eflTects pro- duced, and likely to be produced, by the recent events in France ; information whic h it is very necessary for you to possess ; for the time may ndt be distant, not near so distant as you imagine, when you yourselves will feel some of the consequences of the events to which I allude. ' This second fall of Napoleon has caused wonderful joy in England, amongst the higher orders, and especially amongst the borough mongers, who have been now, a second time, delivered ; Or, at least, have obtained a respite a second time. The re- actioUf which will certainly come, may opieli^te against them. LiUera of WUliam CabbeU, Ei^ MA Rot, irr)tRf%re^fk#bile, th«y get rid of their alarms, which were, • month ago, great'.r than at any former period. ' The boaatin^ here is beyond all conception. Though the fact is notorious, that the Prusaians and the Belgians were fighting on our side against the French ; though it is notorious that we held a vast superiority of numbers and of means of all sorts, we tallc here as if the victory were wholly our onm. Two hundred Ihou- Band pounds, at the first slap, has been voted to the " great lord," as the Spaniards call him. What did you vote to Mr. Jacksoit, who won a more decided and more glorious victory at iVen;-OWeaft« .^-— Burke, with his pension in hit* pocket, calls nobility and konowo the CHEAP defence of nations ; and so they may in countries whose people do not receive money along with the honours. But this grant of money, enormous as it is« appears to be only a beginning. A proposition has been made to make a grant to the Duke of York^ as commander in chief of the army, be having, in that capacity, provided the army for the duke of Wellington to fight with. He has been paid a pretty good salary for this, to be sure ; but this, it seems, is not enough. It is, therefore, now proposed, or at least has been proposed by a member of parliament, to give him money oo account of the sue- cess of the army. You will ask, what takes place in this respect, when we get beaten ? — as in the case of Plattsburg, Lake Cbamplain, Lake Erie, New- Orleans, &c. Why, we hold our tongues. We dp not talk about the matter, 6xcept to praise the valour of our troops for a day or two. Indeed, the country people in England, and a great many of the towns people, never know any thing of such defeats. The London newspapers, which alone have any wide circulation, are employed in the spreading of falsehood and the suppressing of truth. The country newspapers, with very few exceptions, are the mere gutters, through which pass a part only of the filth of the more copious London sewers ; but it is, if pos- sible, the worst part. When the news of your grand achicve-r ment at New-Orleans arrived, it was at once asserted, that WE had gained a great victory. Details even were published. The same was repeated, with trifling variations, for a week. Thus the country papers had time to play their part. The victory was believed in from one end of the kingdom to the other. At the end of a fortnight, out slipped the account of the defeat in the middle of a Oaselte, stuffed up with advertisements and pro* motions. We could not accuse the government of not publishing it ; but, in fact, the mass of the people never either saw it, or heard of it; and, to this hour, there is not a man in the village, in which I now sit writing, who does not believe that we gave you a hearty beating at New-Orleans, In short, the mass i I It' if: I liMer» i)f tFOliam C > Duke of York fought a battle once. Ca/ats, perhaps, too. The r demolition of the basin of Cherbouig. There is no knowing ' where we are to stop. You remember the punishment that our tfious king Richard I. inflicted on his rebel subjects ' in the ' » garrisons which opposed him after his return from his crusade te the Holy Land ! That^ as being the most effectual mode of pre- •> venting the future propagation of rebels, may, perhaps, appear if to the boroughmonger writers as the mode to be adopted towards S the French people upon this occasion. . « That there will be blo(idy vengeance taken now, there is no X 4loubt. The recollection ^ the battles of Genappe, Dunkirk, Austerlitz, Marengo, Hulen^ Wagram, Eyiau, Friedland, Moskwa, i Bmolensko, the Heider, tbe capture of Rome, Naples, Turin, « Amsterdam, Madrid, Hanover, Moscow, Berlin twice, Vienna f twice; in short, the defeats, the humiliations, the shames, and the % bodily fears of a quarter of a century, and, above all, the expo- ; eures of theprieste^ are now assembling all their force to obtain t vengeance. The convention of the Heider^ and the convention I which gave Maria Louisa to the arms of Napoleon, are now to be '^ avenged. The pope has to get vengeance for bis humiliation ; and 'f^ CO they have all. But what are they to do ? They cannot kill the people of France. All Europe, with more than a million of men inarms, and w>'h fifty millions of English money i will replace Louis on the throne of France. But they cannot remain in France; and if they do not remain in France, they cannot keep him upon that throne. He is now, as hast yeavy moving along to- wards the capital under the protection of more than half a miUiorh of soldiers, who have made war, and are making war upon French* men, fighting on their own soil, and in its defence. As long as Frenchmen are kept down by the bayooel, h^ will, of course, re- r LeUtrt (^ Waiiam. CubbtUy £8f.vl a&r talua there; but) how Ideg will that be? He waf oA the threM last year : but he was not there six months after the hostile armiee had quitted France. To hear him ihrealen the French» as he did •ome time ago, with chastisement by foreign armies, 1,)JOD,000 Ml number of men, was natural enough ; but to hear him now talking of th^ir Borrow at his departure, and of their joy at his re^ tumi is calculated to fill one with admiration at the impudence of bis: advisers. He knew well, that it was under the bayonets of foreigners only that he dared advance ; that he, or any of his familyt dared show their nose in France ; and yet, even while he is following close upon the heels of those foreigners; he boasts of being the object of the love and admiration of the French peo- ple I No» no, Louis ; you are restored, as you were last year, by foreign bayonets ; and the question is yet to be decided, whether those bayonets will be able to keep you on the thront. You have yet a stormy time to pass. The battle between light and liberty on one side, and darkness and despotism on the other ; that battle which began in 1789 ia still going on. It may rage less fiercely* for a time ! but it will not be put an end to unless by the trhimph of the former. As to the conduct of Napoleon, upon the last occasion, it wai useless for him any longer to attempt to support his authority as a sovereign ; and, indeed, it would have been well if he had re- signed immediately after his retarn from Elba. This was fully- expected by many men in England ; and it appears from his last act that we have heard of, namely, his e^dication in favour of his son, that he was only restrained by his foolish attachment to the Austrian princess and her child ! After all;his glorious deeds ; after all his famous battles; after all his wise acts of legislation; all his magnanimous proceedings ; all that he had done in the cause of mankind ; after all this, how painful ia it to see him vainly han*- kering after the preserving of a crown to his family ! and, which adds to the mortification, to a son which he had by the daughter of a king; and, of an Austrian, too! It is melancholy to think of. If it had been the son of some tradesman's daughter ! But to risk the freedom and happiness of that gallant nation, who has twice carried him victorious to Berlin, and twice to Vienna; to risk the freedom and happiness of that brave people for the mke of the grandson of a king, and that king an AUSTRIAN KING, too, is horrible to think of. If, upon his return from Elba, he had frankly acknowledged his great error, namely, that of connecting himself with the old royal family, and had declared again for a re- public in name as well as in substance ; if he had done this, and had called for the convetUion, no power in Europe would have moved i^ainst France. But when men saw that the emperor was still to remain ; that they were again to have an empress to maiotaiu with all her royal progeny ; and that they were likely to I in! r ' i 368 Lettin of tfUliam CohhttU Esq, deicend in feie (Vom fkther ^ son ; when they saw this, they could not pouibly feel any portion of the old republican fire warm their hearts. Bay what they would, atill it was a battle between aa^ emperor and a king. Then the new nobility. It was impossible to anitnate a peoph in their cause. They had suffered under the nob t7t(M. before. It was difficult to see why a man should risk life orproperty for thtt^ sake of preserving to these gentry their titles. To see these old^ republicans forming a house of peerB^ and calling themseltei dukes and counts ! This was, indeed, no more than a consequence of the imperial part of the plan ; but it could not fail to fUl with apprehension all those who wished well to the republican cause, and who recollected that it was under the banners of *< liberty and eqnality" that Brunswick was chased out of Friince, an J that the coalition of kings was covered with disgrace, in the memora- ble years 1793, 4, and^5. The truthis, that to defend Fmnce' against such a coalition, all the energy of a republic was necessa- ry in those years ; and it was becom« now as necessary as evei**'* But such energy could not exist under an imperial and aristo- eralical government. The French people felt no more what (bey felt in the first years of the revolution. The proprietors ^were anxious about their land ; but that alone was not sufficient. <' Nevertheless, in spite of these errors of Napoleon, he is enti- tled to the gratitude of mankind. He pulled down the po^)e, the monks in Spain and Italy, the inquisition in those countries. H# carried light and liberal principles to dark and enslaved nationsi He formed a code of wise and just laws; or, at least, he con(irm«^ ed those which had been passed by the republicans. He was a soldier, too, fond of military glory, but, without arms he could not have effected what he did effect in favour of civil and religious liberty in distant countries. Much of what he did will now h^ undone ; but it will be impossible for all the kings and priests in the world to make men as ignorant and submissive as they were before he marched over the Alps. The enemies of freedom, the black'hearted friends of despotism, flatter themselves that now they shall see mankind as superstitious and as slavish as (hey were a quarter of a century back. Tbey will be deceived. They will never again see a touch of the *' holy thorn" sought after irt France as a cure for a cancer. The present race of perverse old women cannot live forever, and they will have no successors. The young ones do not, and will not, believe that holy water will pre- serve them from thunder and lightning ; and, unless they believe thiSy there is no fear of (heir husbands becoming slaves. The common people in England believe in an almanac, called " Moore's almanac ;" they believe that the cunning people who publish it have a knowledge of events of all sorts, and especially the H'eai- ther. Many of the farmers refer to this almanac to know when jMUff^Wmiam, CohbeU^ Esq^ 3d» lliey ought to cut their gran or to %hy their pigt. You will hardly believe thii io America ^ but I, in the faco of my coun- trymen* asaert it to be a fact. The men who sell thii book find their accounta in it. It is aold by the company of stationers* who •erve our rabble, in this respect, in the stead of priests. The people of France are far more enlightened. The pairings of St. Andrew's nails, which used to be a most precious relic, would now be used only as manure in that country. Thft breeches of Po- cooH), so wonder*working in former times, would now fetch only their worth as old rags. Napoleon (and that was his greatest fault) gave, in some sort, a sanction to falsehood, and hypocrisy, and imposture, by going to maas. He did not, indeed, couipel any body else to go to mass : but his example, in this, was of evil tendency. The act was, besides, a compromise with fraud. ; Still the world owes him much, and particularly for having, by his return to France, left no doubt in the mind of any man, that in the restoration of the old family the Frenchpeople had no share. It was always asserted that the French people longed for the re- turn of the Bourbons. Louis was called le desirS. But now it must be clear to every body, that he was, and now is, restored by. voRGiGN FORCE ALONjQ. The casc is now too plain to be confus- ed or misrepresented. It is a triumph of kings or priests over republican institutions. None doubt of the triumph ; no one can deny that ; but it is not the act of the people of France. They bad tried the ancient dynasty before ; they had tried the new or- der of things ; the ancient dynasty was restored ; and they again drove away the ancient dynasty, which is now again (by this time, I dare say) restored by the means of a combined foreign army* who have defeated the armies of France. . So sensible are the aristocrats of this, that they, even now, are almost afraid of the ultimate consequences of their success. They do not see their way clearly out of the adventure. Are the foreign armies to be kept up in France ? Is France to be dii- armed ? How long can either last? The truth is, France is too extensive and too populous to be long kept down. She is not, and cannot be, loaded with debts. The moral effects of the re- volution cannot now be eradicated. It is useless, in short, to re- store the king, unless they could also restore the breeches of St. Poeomo, and the virtues of the holy thorn. These, and divine rigkt, must rise together, or neither can stand for any length of ^•. )y The, king, who will hardly call himself le desire this time, has, in his proclamation to his " loving subjects,** denied that lie ever meant to restore the tythes or the feudal rights j and yet these are of older date than his title to the throne. At any rate, he will never long maintain his throne without them. They 9re at necessary to his political power as food is to his body ; or, i '; i ,in.ii! I 060 liHt^rf of William Cobbttt, Eiq. ^'^m Mthar, ai swordi> guns, aad powder, tre to the umy now em* plojed m his restoration. So yoii see, that a counter revolution is not a thin^ so easiljr accomplished as manj seem to imagine. Tour New-England no- blesse and priests will, I dare say, rejoice exceedingly at this triuivph of the kings and piiests in Europe ; and we, in England, bave, in some sort, good reason to boast of it ; but still, if Napo- leon were to be mardered to-day, and all the old republicans banged up to-morrow, the thing would not be more than a tenth part over. Foreign armies must femain in France^ or there is no security for the king's remaining on the throne. When, then, is this state of things to terminate ? Not, at any rate, before another hundred millions are added to the debt of England ; and even for years to conM, it will be impossible for the allies, upon tbcir principles, to disarm to any considerable extent. The whole of Europe is in a ferment. Light has gone forth, and it is impossible to put it out. Hanging and quartering will do nothing towards it. Men must again believe in the virtues of holy water. That was the main prop of the power of the Bourbons ; and with- out that, they will in vain endeavour to keep themselves long up< ou the throne wtthoat the aid of foreign armies. ' How a sensible man in France, quietly settled on his farm, muet laugh at all that is passing I He must be highly amused at seeing us taxed anew to the amount of u tenth part of our pos- sessions for the purpose of forcing him and his countrymen to endure the sway of a Bourbon ; a Bourbon desirS too ! He must laugh to see hov^ we are fretting, and fuming, and arming, and fighting, and paying away our money, to prevent him from being a republican citizen. He must wonder what we are taking all this trouble, and incurring all this expense ybr. But if he knew what borovgka were, his wonder would soon cease. If he knew what effect these have in making us so generously anxious about the regularly governing of other countries, he would soon cease to be surprised at our late zeal and our present joy. You, in America, understand this matter well. I read, with great pleasure, in many of your papers, the just descriptions which yoH gave ofour motives in thes* ware. But you may be deceived as to the ^ect of them. Nations are c^ten ruined while their governments are gaining /<»rce. We are screwed up toa war pitch, and, while we are at mart we are sti'ong. Tou saw how we were enfeebled by the last peace, short as' was itd duration ; and, I assure you, that there is now, in this country, a general dreaA of the effects of peace. Our situation is this, the taxes, on account of the debt, and the army and navy, are, and must be, so great, that England urast be the dearefit country in the world. Even this second restoration of the Bourbons wiU^ I should suppose, cost us about /our millions of taxes annually, Ldters of William Cobbett, Esq. 361 FOR EVER, which alone ia more than the whole of your rev«- Uue, As to discontents in England, think nothing of themi they are not worth your notice. But income, ingenuity, iu- duitry, will all seek cheap living ; and those who have to buv luods will go to the cheapest market. This debt and army will produce a serious change in our affairs, in a short time. We may, possibly, see the French people tolerably ill treated ; but that will not pay our taxes. By these wars against the French, we have added nearly,/!^ teen millions a year to our peace taxes. And what have we got which we might not have had, if we had remained at peace f The French had then a king ; they then had abolished feudal rights ; they then had abolished tythes. And have they not done so now ? But the noblesse are now to have their titles. The fools might have had their chateaux and their lands, if they bad not run away to join the foreign armies ; and now these art •old away from them. What, then, have we gained for our fifty millions of taxes to be paid annually in peace ? Ask your New- England right honourables this, and they will tell you that we have ^ot a great deal ; for, that we have got " regular govern* ment and social order.*' I amyoura, &c. William Cobbett. Botlej, near Southampton, 6th Jalj, 1815. TO Gentlemen^ I BEG you to connmunicate my thanks to the Republican Citizens of Albany, and to assure them that I think myself high- ly honoured by their present, especially when I take into view the grounds on which it has been presented, and the enlightened state of the public mind, in the country whence it has traversed the ocean to find me in this obscure village. Certainly, if my advice had been followed by the statesmen of England, the late war with America would never have taken Elace. But I am far from certain that, seeing the result, the war as not been, or, at least, will not prove, in the end, beneficial to mankind; and that is to say, beneficial to the real representa- tive, or, self'government. For, without freedom, what is man better than the beasts of the field. These have an abundance to eat and drink, to wear, and whereon to repose ; and, therefore, are not in any wise surpassed in happiness or in dignity by the sub* jects of despots, w|iatever names or forms the despots or des- potism may assume. And, without real representative govern- ment, freedom cannot exist. There are only two states in civil society : one, in which the governed give their assent to the laws; the other, io which laws are made without their assent* The 46 •I \m ' i>. i n n $^ Ldlers of fVilliam Cobbdt^ Eaq. \ ■ \ 1 " fif-st is a B/ate of freedom ; the other a state of slavery. In the ane case the people submit to rules agreed on by themselves ; io the other they submit (u a master. The suit of clothes which you have sent me, prqyes very clearly that you can make as fine and as beautiful broadcloth as any in the world. Those to whom I have shown it, say it is the very finest they ever saw. But though I rejoice exceedingly at your astonishing piogress in this and other branches) of manufac- turftj which, for the reasons given by me in my preface to a re- publication of Mr. Livingston's work on sheep, 1 look upon as a change in the aflfaird of the world, singularly favourable to the happiness of all people, and as unfavourable to (he cause of des- {X)ti:imj still the war has been more beneficial to mankind in an- other way, the events and the terminalion of it having clearly prov- ed, that, to defend a country against the most powerful, and active, and best disciplined enemies, there need be neither standing armies, privileged orders, titles, decorations, nor expensive government, provided the people be the uiakers of their own laws, the choosers of their chiefs, and be, at the same time, enlightened in their minds. This is the great, the important, the most useful fact, wfai<{h the Sate war has established beyond all dispute. T'je pensioned Bukkb talked of titles and privileges as the cheap defence of nations ; as if he had forgotten the immense sums of money with which these are always accompanied. You will see that nearly a million of dollars have been voted to one of our commanders for one victory, beside nearly two tnillions before for other military services. These sums would make a deep cut into the whole of your country's revenue for a year- But, while this is going on, it has been stated in parliament that Uie county jails are tilled with debtor farmers^ and (he country swarms with paupers. If, indeed, the pensioned Buuke had seen you, with aPftusiUKNT, costing 25 thousand dollars a year, and with generals and commodores, unpensioned, untitled, urged c." solely by the love of 'Veedora and a sense of duty, not only He- fending the sacred soil of their country, but performing deeds c- heroism without a parallel in the annals of Eiiropean nations, with all their titles, decorations, and pecuniary rewards ; if he had lived to see this; if he had seen the war wound up by a village lawyer at New-Orleans, with a band of raw militia, whose officers even were ?carcely in uniform^ by defeating, and puCing to Alight, after an iramense slaughter, superior numbers' of the best disciplined, arid^bravest, and best commanded invaderti thai Ilurope ever had to boast cf j ir he had lived to see this, and to see your brave coun- tryman. Jack sow, without litle or petuniary reward, return, per- kaps, again lo his occupation at the bar — then, indeed, the pen- sioueu BuEivi: might well have exciaimed, behold^ herct the cheap defmce of nations, ••. .._i ,/» „ „ ^. ■ V .•»!.■'> Letters of miliam Cohbett, Etq,'^ 363 It is by establishing, and m. icing known throughoat this yf ot\A, facts like the*ip r, it la by aflfurding Hiicb lesaons and such examplea to mankind, that the late war haa done a good which far outweigha all the temporary misery which it occasioned. Tiiose lessons, and those examples, mast, in the end, produce their due degree of effect. But give me leave to avail myself of this opportunity to express my anxious hope that it will be the constant object, the never-ceasing care of the people of A.inerica, to guard, as they would guard the apple of their eye, those principles of their con- stitution which forbid the creating of privileged orders, l^o you the introduction of titles wouM be the death of freedom. The very first step towards that fatid measure would be followed by a corruption of manners and every evil of civil society. Whene- ver men in such a state as yours begin to wish to place themselves and families above the mass of their fellow citizens, they start without restraint in the career of all sort, of baseness. The ap- peliaHons and epithets of Squire, and Excellency, and Honour^ and Honourable, given amongst you, milhoui tkought^ in general, faave a mischievous tendency. What have you to do with these old bridges of the feudal times, or these modern inventions of Eu- ropean courts ? The president, the governor, the members of con- gress, the secretary, the ambassador, the commodore, the general, the judge, the sheriOT, the mayon, the justice, the doctor, the priest, if you have one, are sufficieuliy de-iigiialed and sufficiently ho- noured when they are called by (he naiue of their office. Any thing further smacks of aristocracy — which, wherever great riches are accumulated, requires to be watclied as narrowly as those weeds, which, if not checked in time, would completely overtop, aubdue, and destroy the crops destined for the food of man. The happiness of America arises chiefly, not from the great learning possessed l>y any part of her citizens, but from (lie en- lightened 8ta(e of the minds of f/te /i;/io/ey>op?(/'i^Jo/i. TJiis has arisen from the means of education which «// possess. These means arise, not so much from (he superior hi>afely be cheap, because it is strong in the good sense, the infurmatioo, freedom, Sind happiness of (he people. Next \o your enlightened 8ta(e of mind comes, as a cause of yelir happiness, that inoderok' tion in the desire to amass wealth, which is the natural conse- quence of an absence of titles and family distinctions. Al! (he money of Peru would not place either of your sons above (he Bonof your poorest neighbour. Since, therefore, no great end is to be obtained by the possession of wealth, men are less likely to use unjustiiiable means in obtaining it, as well as less likely to ap- ply it to a corrupt use, or to heap it on one child (o the ruin of all the rest. Hence that equal distribution of property ; hence that 'i^ r 864 Letters of William Cohbettf Esq A IM :' '■'•)■ : si 5 I ttubborn spirit which makes the labourer refuse to call his tm* plo/er master; hence that consciousneaa of self worth, which makes meannees and crimes so rare ; and hence* in (he Americana, that fidelity to their country and their colours, and that contempt for their enemies, which naturally must produce, and which aU ready have produced, such wonderful effects. Introduce family distirictiona and primogenitureship, and all these blessings vanish at once. It would not take ten yeafs after that to fill your country with sinecure placemen and pensioners, political spies and informers, hired writers, fraudulent and servile domestics and labourers, and paupers too base to be numbered amongst them.^ If you want on instance of the lengths to which a thirst after titles and family distinctions will lead men, look of Napoleon. See that wonderful man ; that matchless soldipf " wise lavrgiver ; the brave, the generous, the acute, thr ced Napoleon; see him, even to the very last moment ot Lih pow- er ; and when he knew that that power was just departing, in all human probability forever from his grasp, still clinging to his un- fortunate desire to have royal dtscendants. There can be no question that it was this desire, and the acts which it produced^ that finally have led the kings and their subsidized armies to Paris. When the French people had been used to an emperor for 8ora«» years, they were no longer ashamed to think of receiving a kin;^; The emperor, by moulding the republic jnto an empire, prepared it to become a kingdom. This he manifestly did for the sake of family! from that accursed motive of vanity^ which has ruined the reputation of so many really great men, and has plimged so m^ny nations into misery. Guard against the indulgence of it in your country,^ I beseech you. You are, happily, free from titles and family distinctions. Make it a rule to look upon every one as an enemy of the country, who makes the smallest attempt to introduce them ; and thus will you keep the scourge from amongst you. ', Another evil for you to guard against, is, any increase in the power of the priesthood. If you look at Europe, you will see the amount of the evils which this power has produced. The struggle now in France is, in fact, between the priesthood and freedom of thought. If the enemies of France do not restore the power of the priesthood, they will do nothing at all, at least to- wards the accomplishment of their great object: that is, the era- dicating of what they call the jacobin system : whenever the priesthood have power, that power is sure to be employed on the side of what is called " regular government ;'* that is, the keep- ing of men in order by coercive means. It is very odd, but the fact is so, that even you find priests of all denominations pull together in this way, (hough (hey are daily and hourly accusing each other of teachifig false doctrine. Each tells you that it is 1?^ fil LtUvta of William Cobbeit, Esq, 36# fiinfiil not to believe in what he teaches, while be tella you th^ ail other sorta of priests are to be liatened to also, though all (hoiMi others tell you that he is ia the wrong. How can you account ' for the wonder I zeal of the protestant clergy of Europe to re« store the pope and catholic religion f Dues not this zeal put thc^ subject in a light so clear as to make it impoasibie longer to misun* derstand it ? Does it not show, (bat priests of all denominations, though they pronounce the creed of each other to be damnable, make common cause as towards the people? Does it not show, that they are all on the side of " strong government .•'** There- fore, take care to give them no ireans of possessing an influence io your political affairs. By the same conveyance, I received a printed copy of propO" tials for republishing, in an octavo volume, by Messrs. BsLDi^jr and Co. of Nkw-York, my Letters on the late War. This also^ bas, as may be supposed, given me great pleasure. It is another striking instance of the great power of Me press; and it is & proof to me, that my labours are not thrown away. It is another motive to industry. When, after long tugging against wind and tide, the almost exhausted and despairing mariner sees his little bark h&gi- ning to make ahead, courage returns to his heart, and Rtrenglh to his arms; he makes new and greater exertions ; and,' finally, he overcomes all obstacles. So, I hope, it will be with me. I now see that I have forced threat and valuable truths amongst the millions of freemen who inhabit America, as well as amongst my own countrymen. I feel pride, which I cannot, and which I do not wish to disguise, when I reflect, that what I Write in this little village, is, in a few weeks afterwards, read by many mil* lions of people here, and in another hemisphere, and those, too, the most enlightened of mankind. I must be, and I am, proud to see these essays of mine, written, somctimei^ in the space of a day, and amidst cares innumerable, and pursuits that demand and receive my attention from daylight to dark, thought worthy of being moulded into pamphlets and books. And this gives me the greater pleasure, when I reflect, that no adverlisements, no puffs nor reviews, that no extraneous aid of any sort, has ever been resorted to by me ; but that my essays, unsupported, and unprotected^ have been sent forth to find their way throughout the world. In conclusion, gentlemen, I shall announce, through this chan* nel, my intention to put into execution, a measure which I have long had in view, which I am certain would be greatly beneficial to the people of America, which I had actually begun while in prison, and which was laid aside on account of the war. I have perceived, from several American writings on agriculture, and es- pecially from Mr. Livingstones work on sheep ; and, indeed, I Koow the fact froo: my own observation, that your long winttn m- Letters of William CobbOt, £«r/. tnd late springs are a great impeciiment to the keeping of bo large numbers of all sorts of animals which atford sustenance to man, and especially of sheep, as might otherwise be reared and maintained. I am of opinion that it is in my power to leach yon, speaking always from ray own knowledge and actual experience, how to remedy the defect of a want of abundance of suitable food for all such animals during these seasons. I mean to say, that if any farmer, who now farms in the old way, as E saw it in Pennsylvania, will follow my instructions, he will be enabled, with scarcely any additional capital or expense, to duuole the quantity of live stock upon his farm. A book, having this object in view, is now preparing by my eldest son, ami will be sent to be pub* lisfied in Philadelphia, in the month of November next. I mean the manuscript will go hence, in, or before that month With these views, gentlemen, and not with the views of our agricultural socieliesy whose minds seem, in general, to partake essentially of the earth, whence they take their appellation, I propose to communicate the intended instructions on the culiure and prfseruation ofrvinter and spring food /or cattle and sheep f and if the commnnicaiion should be attended with success, it will always be a gratification to me to reflect, ih^it it will be justly thought to have arisen, in some degree, or, at least, to have been accelerated by the gratitude which has been excited by your obliging and public spirited letter. I cannot, even here, conclude, without congratulating you most cordially on the defeat oftlie Algerines by the gallatit Decatur and his no hm gallant coinpanionis. Even in this your republic has given a blow to tyrants in general. Even in this your ex- ample is of great weight. JB^ven in this does the world see a proof of those sound and just principles, which are the basis of your political institutions. To free the captive from the lash of bar- barians ; to restrain them from future cruelties ; to punish them for past torments inflicted on the innocent ; to make the sea the gafe highway of nations; to avenge the insults and the violences committed aininst freemen, these are motives of war worthy of A terir.a. A Louis, king of France, acquired the title of SAINT Louis, because, at the instigation of the pope and the priests, he fought against these isame Algerines to make them change their religion. Your ground of war is very diflferent : it is that of a free and enlightened people, drawing the swot J in the cause of unequivocal justice and humanity. Our newspapers, and so will it be with the reviews and magazines, (except the Monthly Ma^asine,) are very d"^y and shj/ upon this subject. They notice the account of your victory, but they do it in a way nbicb clearly shows that they are very sorry for it They do not say this in so fnany words; but that this is their feeling is manifest. Ttie truth is, they feel it to be a blow against tyranny Letters of William Cohbelt, Esq. mi generally ; and they also smell danger, though distantt in the encouragement which it wilt certainly give tu Hie growth of your navy^ which, to them and their supporters, is the must htdeoiia of all ideas. They think, and, indeed, they say, that France wiU now be crippled for a century ; and I shall not be at all surprised, if they soon begin to inculcate the necessity of crippling you (or a like season. I will take care to convey to you an account of their proceedings ; and, once for all, let me beseech you most earnestly TO READ THIS ACCOUNT WITH ATTEN- TION. Be you -united, however, and you have nothing to fear. No compromise with traitors; no compromise with men who clearly aim at the subversion of your freedom; but tnoderation towards all who honestly differ in opinion. Mutual concession there must be among those who honestly differ, or your couptry will be divided and enslaved. Let not a consciousness of your valour lull you into a false security. You are all armed, can all sbootf are all willing to fight ; but there wants organization. You want adopted, and that, too, directly, the plan of Major Cart» mriglit, detailed ina little work called "Evoland's iEois;" that is, the means of effectually defending the country without a standing army. I wish this work was in the hands of your governors and president. Once organized according to the plan of that work, you might set all the world at defiance ; without such organization the time may come when your country will be in imminent danger. The duty of every free man, and his very first duty, is to prepare himself for the defence of bis freedom. To say that he is always ready to fight in that defence to his iast breath is not enough. Actually to be ready to do this is still short of tha mark. He should not only be ready and willing so to fight, but he should be able to fight, to exert his courage and patriotism ta t!:e greatest possible advantage. And this is not to be accom-* plished without organ /sah'on; mlhout constant a tleni ion to thitt great duty ; without cheerful submission to regulations agreed on ; without an ever-active vigilance ; without, in short, makin;:; all private concerns give way to this paramount consideration. Thi» is the way to preclude the necessity of a standing army, with alL- its accompaniments of heavy taxes, dissolute manners, and in- sidious distinctions ; this is the way to live, in safety, at peace with all the world ; this is the way, and the only way, to preserve inviolate your political institutions, to prevent the prodigious iin crease o< yoav population and your wealth from endangering your liberties, and to hand down to posterity that happiness and freedom, that ease and plenty, which you have received from the hands of your wise and gallant fathers. I! sJ I' i i a-: ' ■; I! 36U Lethra of William Cobbett, Esq, With' these reflections deeply impreBsed upon my mindl ;'with an anxious desire that they may awaken attention in your country; with sincere wishes for the happiness of your country in general, and of yourselves in particular, I am, gentlemen, your most obedient servant, WlUilAM COBBBTT. , Botley, July 16, i815. ~\ TYTHES. Trg article which I have given below with this title, taken from the Cork Chronicle, I hope my friends in America will read with attention. It shows them what they are to expect if their Cos- i^ack Friesthood should succeed in their attempts to establish a dominant church. Not only will they exact a tenth of their corn, and their cattle, which grow and are fed in the fields, but their fruit, their apples, their pears, their plumbs, and all those choice and delicious products which constitute the kitchen garden, and are so consoling to the heart of man, will be tythed by these rapa- cious fiends, who, as was the case in France before the revolution, had the impudence there to assert, that the earth and its fulness is their heritage, and that the people, over which they had assum- ed a sway, were created merelj to be fleeced by them. It is for this, and this only, that t)ie priesthood in America are exerting themselves to overthrow the republican government They feel, that under a frugal government, which is careful to teach every 0ian his duty in society, without calling in the aid of spiritual teachers, there is no chance of their being able to establish an em- pire over the mind. This, the foundation of all their power, being unattainable, their grand object is to bring into discredit that sys- tem which presents so formidable a barrier to their encroach- ments. From the Cork Chronicle. Bishop of Cloyne's Court. — Our readers may recollect that S we called their attention some time since to the subject of certain ^ citations issued from this court at the suit of the Rev. Thomas Carson, Rector of Kilmahon, for the recovery of tythe of green clover, apples, pears, plumbs, and che' ries, which grew in a kit- < chen garden. On Tuesday last, the court was crowded to excess, principally a very respectable number of gentlemen, assembled to ' witness the proceedings. However, upon reading the citation, it was discovered that it was erroneously filled, so that the claim of the Rev. Pastor was dismissed, after going through part o{ th' r-^ Lftteri (/ WUHam Cobhett, Esq, 36d •videncfB. We kave been iMforDiecl that the vicar geneni took this opporttmitjof ceiMuring, in very strong and energetic language, Bueh novel modes of proceeding as the present, and expressed his hope that this would be the last t^ime he should witness claiofui of this nature brought into bis court. However, we have been informed, that the Rev. Mr. Carson declared in open court hia in* tention of recommencing the mit» It was brought against Wm. Abbott, Esq. of Ballymalee, a young gentleman connected with the most respectable families of the society of friends, throughout the country, and from whose welt-cultivated farm, of 133 acres, the Rev. Pastor requires a considerable yearly income in tythe. This gentleman has been remarkable for his very kuid Attention to a widowed mother, and a number of brothers and sisters, who were left a burthen upon him at a very early period of life. The same Rev* Gentleman was dismissed upon two other citations on the same dayr one of which was for the tythe of a small quantity of flax which grew in a head land of a cornfield, the tythe of which ha^ been duly paid. ' To the people of all parties in the United States of America-— on 'ihe necessity of their being prepared for the defence of their couniry. Before this reaches you, you will hfive heard of the great events which have taken place in Europe. Those events, if you se« riousiy look at them, will convince you that it is high time for you to betake yourselves to the means of making your country a dwor' bk aB)'lum for the oppressed of all nations \ a safe abode of free» dom. This is in no way to be done, but by arming yourselves ; by keeping yourselves constantly armed ; by being, at all times, ready to enter the field of battle ; and this state of preparation is to be efiected only by wise organisation. If you look into our newspapers of a fortnight past, you will see, that they have now openly and unreservedly promulgated princi' pies, according to which your country might be laudably invaded, your cities laid in ashes, your women violated, yourselves robbed and murdered, even in the hour of peace. You will see, that they recommend the perpetual imprisonment, or themwrdcr of Napo- LKON, who has given faimseltup as h prisoner of war, whose victo- ries were never stained by cruelty or insult to the captive, and to whose cleuiency so many old reigning families owe tne preserva- tion ot that power, under the combination of which he has, at last, fallen. You will see, that they recommend the murder of every man who has distinguished himself by his exertions against the 47 370 Letters of ITilliatn Cohhtit, Esq, M ii'i -v ''):■ horrible feudal and ecclesiastical tjrannj formerly existipg io France. You will see, that tbey alu oat literally thirst for the blood of every man in France, who has done, or who is suspected of widhins to do, any thing to preserve the liberties of the French nation. You wjIUee that, now that Napoleon isiwboUy unable to act against the kings of Europe, these men are directing their ma- lice against all that they think likely to oppose their views of mu*. vernal . oppression. You will see that,, as the kmg of France does not appear disposed to shed blood, < and to strip the people almost of their very skins, these men are urging the allies to take the work into their own hands. You will see, in short, that they have now undisguisedly avowed, that England and Europe can never be safey while one particle of freedom is left in France, while any thing but misery and slavery are left in that popubua and extensive country. We are not to believe it possible that these savage, these mur- derous recommendations, will be followed ; nor, if followed, are,we to believe, that the wishes of these fiends in humau shape would be accomplished. We are not to believe it possible, that any king^ or any minister, will entertain the wish, much less attempt the deed, of making neighbouring, or rival, nations wretched "/or a century^* test their growth and prosperity should endanger his power ^nd meaqs of ^ving in spjendour. We are not to believe it possible, for instance, that any king, ov minister, of England, will ever entertain the horrid wish of " putting you back for a centu^, ry" that you may ni[^,be able to cope with him* But, while you actually see that thei^e are public write, s, even in this country, who not only openly avow such wishes, and that, too, with respect to America, as well as with respect to France, ought you not to think it possible, that, in some part or other of the world, sooner, or later, the principles of these men may possess the minds of those who may be able to endeavour, at least, to put them into execution? These writers are men of great weight in the wprld. You have seen the numerous instances in which they appear to have been the dictators of faction in mighty affairs. Their writings are never to be despised. They are always to be altended lo} and I beseech you to attend to them. They hate you mortally, chiefly because you are really frecy and because you exhibit to the world the great example of order, tranquillity, prosperity un- paralleled, under a government of such mildness and cheapness* They are men of excellent memories: revenge is never extin- guished in their breasts; from the same motive that they now re^ commend the murder of the great and generous conqueror of the continent of Europe, they would, if they had the power, tear your, tjQdies to pieces. Be you assured, that these men will die withr' out having felt one single moment of solid satisfaction, unless tbey .#.>, Jjdters of William Cobbett, Esq. 371 wl^f^'jb^f ^litical institution! deitroy^cl, jour country made a hemp of ruioi, and /ourselves reduced to the most degrading ala* very. While you know tliat such paasions are existing in the world ; while you see that the human mind may be so brutalized, so cor* rupted, and so hardened against the feelings which nature inspirea, it oecomes you to guard your liberties and your lives } to begin hietimes to prepare for their protection against the acts to which such passions may 6nnlly lead. And let not any party amongHt you suppose, that these mart, if they could stir up an enemy against yoit, would make any exceptions in favour of that parly. Until they saw half a million of the allies in France (hey were applauding the royalists, and urging them on to cut the throats of their re- publican countrymen. But now they make no distinction. It is now France that is to be punished, it is now, not Napoleon, not the jacobins; it is France that is to be "piit back for a century.** Only think, for a moment, of the means that must be used to ac- complish such a purpose. Only think of the pillaging, the mur- ders, the acts of devastatbn, which are necessary even to afford a chance of effecting such an end. Only think of the rancour, the bloody mindedness, that must have engendered such an idea. These men now applaud the federalists, whom they call the " sound part of the people.'* But if they could urge any power to invade you, the federalists would soon find, as the royalists in France now do, that it is against the whole country, against the prosperity and happiness of the whole ^nation, that their hatred is directed. Now and then, when thrown off their guard by some particular cause of exasperation, they confound, in their abuse, both parlies under the name of " the Americans ;*' and I have been not a little amused at reading, in a Boston federal paper, se- rious, but very plaintive, remonstrances upon this score, stating, *' that it is unjust in these, our writers, to cotifoitnd the different descriptions of Americans thus ; that they ought to discriminate ; that they are right in venting their hatred against the democrats i but that they should recollect that the federalists are a very good and respectable sort of people, lovers of order and religion, and that, besi'-r ^ , they actually 6ght the battles of these writers in America." Let these malignant men only be able to stir up the means of doing you mischief, and the authors of these humble waitings will soon see that their hatred, like the bullet, is no re> specter uf parties or persons. Before the allies were in France, they told us that all the " sound part of the community'' (keep this phrase in mind) were decidedly in favour of the king, and es- pecially thf, "good and respectable Bourgoisie" But non; they announce to us, with delight, the sums of money and the masses of food and drink which, as they tell us, the allies are compelling the " iOund*\ as well as unsound ta pay. They tell iis, with par; ,i. I iij I? i:> I." El* m ^1 sr2 hellkra tfW(Uwm CohbeUt £«9> f' f " ^ ;; i'H- .1 ? :r If tioito ntiifacHonv that the ** faonett old lAaNhal BluelMr" i» quarteriog liia aoldiera upon the people of Parn t that ia, upon the *^good and respectable Bourgoisiei'* who-were so hearty and faith* f lit in the cause of the kio^. This is the treiitnenl thejr approve of as to the royalists in France ; this is the ir«y in which the j turn round upon their friends there. And irould they not do the lame towards their /nnids in America ? I wiU here insert a passage fr<»m the Timss newspaper, uA. one from the Couhibr, under the date of the 28th July, 1816, in order to give you a specimen of the views of our leading pub- lio prints. Aild, again and again, I beseech you to mark well their conduct: for I tell you, as, indeed, you niist know, that they are not smgtdar in (heir way of thinking. We will first iiiear the OouRiun : ' ^ " We have been given to understand that the conditions which the allied sovereigna think it necessary to dictate to France in her twice captured capital, will be made known in a few days. One ri the French papers on Monday announces that the treaty of Paris is to be maintained ; that of course the territory of France remains untouched ; that there are to be contribotions imposed for the expenses of the war, all participation in which, it is Under- fttood, have been renounced by two of the powers ; (we trust we are not one ;) that the allied troops will soon retire, except about 160^000 Russians, who will evacuate the country by 25,000 at a time, in proportion as the French army becomes reorganized ; that the emperor of Austria has declared, that wishing to avoid all cause of jealousy or umbra^, he will not leave a single Aus- trian corps lin France. The Journalist then concludes, with com- pliments to the magnanimity of the allied powers. Magnanimity ! call it rather folly ; but we do not, and cannot believe them to be capable of thromng away, in this manmer, the adtantagea they liave gained^ and of sacrificing their duty to their subjects, lieave the French territory as it was ! and thus leave her the power to disttn'b again the repose of Europe ! Endanger Belgium ! For wMl any man say she can be secure whilst France keeps her northeni fortresses? The paragraph, therefore, in the Paris Journal cannot be correct. The following arrangement, we hear, 1^111 be found to be nearer the truth. The immediate disbanding of the army of the Loire hy the king; an ordinance to that effect fnay be expected in a day or two. Why not extend the decree ■to the other armies of France ? The raising another army com- prised of men who have proved their fidelity to the king. The After calling upon the government to murder Napoleon ; after assertmg, that, if he be not publicly put to death, Despard was murderedf he proceeds thus : r. ^* Is it considered what effect the knowledge of his being in i«xistence must necessarily have on the disaSected in every part of Europe ? They will think, and think with truth, that the al- lied sovereigns are afraid to touch the life of a man who has so »fnany adherents and admirers. This, of course, will increase the number of his adherents, and the fervour of their admiration. If in the depth of his degradation, their idol can inspire respect ; if the cultivators of religion, and virtue, and loyalty, are forced flo bow down before the splendour of his crimes, even when un"* der eclipse, what munt they do at the happy moment, when he bursts forth again from behind the cloud ; a moment towards z'' -. I ti IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I 1.25 j5 !: 1^ M 2.2 i*o III 2.0 1.8 1-4 llilli.6 Vi <^ /}. O A 'c>^- %, # % N,^ ^> / w Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 d \ iV O # Cv 6^ >> ri>^ r^^N 3r4 iidiiiNioc# to dw «rtHi#iitil|f #>^«*^^«f ;« iiiii'lMi ll^ltM^li «»tlle Movt fbtfUMMito^^f fan Hiftv^i liiid^eU^ iriHi^Hi^lsipPMi tto «stri«MfMH(]F ««<^Mi ^Meib^tfaliilliMi liMlMI AiMt!^' df Jwtktii w»%«iU e«feiililbd (^ irldMl^or ^itttMlfi^til He troMvltistiwM^to tlioieirbodk hif kM moft inf^rtd^^^' Dlttli^f bravttd^lhv fttrj «f ^ the m^i* <#'■*• the l!iri!«%«mrt*^HMi^ tkrou^^fierV^rnntatfie i rni^ olir foll)r{ our ce#Mr^e>, <#filc!( the oirtcleof^lt ttifotj! « A« 4ob^ at htf Ktm} tbifitffc^lMi attd MfceHkitt WMt ' toarWiNirbeie^ at wotk; ^ Iffl 4i(mii^, r«lea8«/lllf»H«|lpeav«lict-'^tM>btf«lilM(iri^^^^ or an kifaiiMtir «friiitia9l, 1i^'ir}K>%e «M«id^iwd '^^^invfi' fminee, Mjustljr >hept iftfom >«hetaiiybrai«tf/lr)aliiil nieak pi^itdn^ '\%nt not > a humn>7fMl, that mimf Wht'i of ih^ Mngliah nifficer* art pergonal 'Admirers of NapoltmyBUom^ ^orle/AfQst of these young gentlea^en (for it is df the yduiigdii^ eevt that I speci'i) have no better reading thlln tfMr ilf<#nitl^ CkfO' imie,or the Edinlmrgh Rniiknn or tvttne othif w«t-thlelis pfM^ dnefion* m which this monster is titmAfy i^c^ts& %s the' fli«tt>f Iwfoes, the great captun of the 1^4 &o. it is no wonder that suebstutHcs should daassle their ionghiatfon, and-ic 99 fMgkti'NiCipohon Bwmaparie h've«, this very aeriotu evil <«i'Mpi MtimchdiAaig," , •^itilowiMma you sq^se that a aimister lifccr^ this wrfti f^^h^^ would commit a deli^^rate oininderhi revenue on ttmtnjbr biting an cbj4^ of admiration, woold not, if he could, gladly cut Ml ^^otir throats, men, women, and children? The fears that the wretch feeia and describes are a proof of' the ftisehoods of htlT accusation ; for if Napoleon's deeds were such M he asserts tfaetli tohave been, what reason can there ^be to teke away his life, lest ■o large a jpal't of mankind should stilt feel an interest in hi« fate? H^ wosld have Ni^ieon murdered, not because he has d^ne that which has made him an object i^ hatred and contemptf but be- cause he has done that which has made hisa «n object of love and admiration* Having thus dispoaed of Napoleon, he comes to the French army, the whole of whom alsi» heHeemrtonvish to «ee disposed of w the lame bloody way^ u..-;.. , \ .. . ' ■.:■.. •.;■'. ; . ■.: ■; . _ . . Lmiibidj^^mm^iMti m^' wm^ lie migtttorf, fo, tint tlnr dHiif ^pf^«I^UI{rH vfi^Mfe^Ml^^ b« % leniM;^ »lifc&vt|fii;' do^ tkeit "(Mif^HrtAftiM; %tl«feioui^ikllrM bM^ witl^be^everleekM', bat shobfti ttf»j^ bbitiniitibl/fiiie^^ete i%^lliiir jUftliiMil «dittdyct^ #e eikhipb^g^ Ihitr th^y ll A fet i N t l i ' «Wi lMi4l^.#|lk4^li^ro^ Wfflbe-^fil Mii^l^tle fffBilorlJitipi^ ihto^ftefierd/faMifaere deftest^, ifa«uld ^q|c iteixiieibre ^t'lt «mi ceeslktWHIi ' anjr tegolir attd 1^- g^Vf rBvent, w Joer^ibie^ Our gir^at d^tabt ai to tbe'i^ecM eaMoilieti* of tfalt a^{cIe,te«ilt»fM>tt1hetbaraeter anc^iiabite of Urn ^men ^ th^ ai« Jbttiefljr imtMvt Aomes, ioinred onl/ to catlipR, lirriaoiie, battles nd fatt^Har with ho other topea thAn ^tc^im oe iocideot to tfaote (bonnet of life, tailohd^,' advancfeoient^ #• HlMt ttMur t^nrt'i^^ i iQ that It ii t^m id impdi^lt ifmMif mm 9kmM iN«r ' fkant to limit ikents^ytt to the h>6^f eaMi^ec£dK ao thaf^ K^heatf iii^il mtf atteMpf to^prevent tfa^^bittliite and' eiitk« conquest of ihdr cdtintrf » Iber a^noCtoca!^^ tOf livdi^ being Innged ! and) if tbej laj dom> their arma, and are iHlfing t^ diaperae, they ** have no komt9i** and it is iDpoasiUft, dr nejtt !#• im|K>SBibMt Ihet they ^honid ever Yetora toi IranM^njii^' S^^ toce n#(m and hffcicntef He Ictt6w« well thif if th^ arttkf^ Oenid be coo&pleteljr aniiihilated, France would have' no cfaanei^ oC aalvatien. But let me beaeeell you to recollect wbat tbeie men /ormerfjf said about the persons composing thiasami aiinjr.^ While Napoleon waa leadmg this army to lictoryi wMfe thii army was Mlowb^ him over Europe, these writers bmuHed Uiitii^ fate. They were tlien poor, unhappy youths, dragged from fen firesides of their fond and respectable parents, tied band and foot, ^ "^ ' * •' • " • Ohlhow that they J and they DOW cail tLese same personr rob&«rs. They say they are "tvith^ ovthomee^** and recommend the massacre of them, it being next to impossible that they nhodd return to tranquil life. And do your federatiah imagioe, that they would be put in jpossession of power, if these men could stir up a conquering ene- n)y against you npon their principle ? if once they uliw your country overrun, your government p^ to the rout, they would that very moment talk of the whole of you in a himp. They would call everything /o%, « triminal weakness,** short of the utter riiin of your country. Jlay, have you not already had a n I is i'i -I m^ |«q%l9«l~|i«|E, Iter ilw^yt tn^qf." tb» inip4 put" # f«ii. Ifff«piviri{|i7fi|i.. TItfgr mid. fkiilbe *f'MQm4^f^^.4kmpk^ 3IPH fmmmb^r tint Hny Ihta wid that n^ jimm iwiiU^,b%4fiwt» lht4ii*M •? Bo jr9 ]Did«,pllK J^^ lioB»M„bf«o sul^ffledr luMiiymirciyUiiiid^HJwtl iMtJiwI ])itil^m«i«^i, ftB«»i44oiV J)«d bMD 4p woi4itk|^t)M!BF ijkeii Mjr arnvrt tlie couim part of thf «9q|i|P^^ qo| al wofd «|M|llt>tllMsd«n|/ii(t•^ «|i0t;ii^ f^ ^ .ea»tfliii atataa i'r npt a., inpd aUfnt> Sir* Oti» or iba lOtJMf IfiatAML wbom they ^ »MM iw e <» < ** 9C yotu «0* , |^ win Iba ^ miaT caie?oiii|iV ¥if va of the waUer, ^ deoMffiratic J»beli." What maQiH theiw i;qMld; they Jsxvm to aiipiioae^ that they »ece» hy these writarft^iito^ded t«ba«p|M any ,aMNr« than the reet <»^ thei peo]^ ? , Jq al^ t||ieir praiaea of ** the foiiruli^rt of the paopley'V they were afituajted ^y^the de* liire of obtaining the aid of tne federaliata in rendering your imiiii mgre certain and more complete, ^ -TwomMtba have not pitied over onr h«ida lince tbeie.vri' 4en were applauding the aendiog of arma and anwnnHioii, to^ the Moyalista of La Fendc«t whom theyxaUed brapft faiU^l^ nli" giowf, and whom th(^ urged on to eiterminale the^ocd^i a* jthey called thein, who were oppoaed to the BoarhtHW* Now, be- Caiub the Vendeana do not seem to relish the total conquest, the dismemberment, and utter ruin of their country .by ipreign armieit, they caufound them with the army of .Marshal -Davousti they Jump them along with the crther partiea ; and even accuse them i>f iugratUvde ! They are called to^ru/^ to JSngtatidt b«r f.ause they do not appear inclined to aid in the despoiling even ^«f« ^ wmmOfthM* m- :m M€9krs4 U|[!9ir(||i|[;ipt apnl •^lpl,llnidM Btt^wiuit istbijiinorflitb^ Jijl^y chi^jBM withof'HgM ; U|»jr cheered tbtoa on ; .'t|if j jiqp- 4^fWkM the ;pon4u«l'cif the proaMteri* Bvt wh^^ tli^ con^eB- i|^,|Nrok« fm .f^ p!}pe^, #J^ a^^Ait AIil4 ? We ^pected a ^^vwton o/(ibe wiion^ be ^ijc/^ifiecl crt oitce ; ^ at Ifaii^, the iqafMachme^t « yjervf "WMr w« ^p«>«ted ti(e 4fmtralUy 9fthANc|W-£qgli^idB^^9j9^ declared. .; ^a .things Dpw Stiwidy .these ptai^ ought no^,lo^^9^v,to, experienqe qur for- Jktflrfifi^ feeiii94he,itigra- jpiitl itto^ what womldhaye beeodisgrao^uli atle^t, to Ibeir .wiHglr^jin ordfij U^^, th^^rmb^ «n4> i^^ :tf»e«ip»e»?fe», upop ^V^i^t and ^ wfSjvtosay the;leastof it, carryjpgfparlj^spi- KUtofiQ^wanrafitafc^e^l^gtb., Therpisfl^tdoubtin my mini},nqr in tiuU^^ any,^Q^tJybma|ipD^ihat I hf^vp,^ conversed with th« wAtiectyJ^liifjfis theienq^H^ag^^mpnt held out hy the con- Ict pf p^ Jn the eiiste|:n states, which prolonged th® war after _ le^peace of Facisi.and^ipd^ed^r-tt waSrthat encouragement which, ■Iflpttt than any thing eke, |Mro4t cleBHr shown thk they- have those ititiha, Bdr tlir» caa8e«{Vpeiirs tc?be-thi8i tlief sde/'tfaey^f, ttttt tbe freight^ tfaiet^x^fl in Enplndi'lbineji! to othe^ «nnes, luinit, if the'#ibrM >b idft in qdiM For yeitrs, pr^d^e vif^i d%«« of 4ec)h^e hi (Ith cdunti'y. Thhih tben hsV#, for ntsnj :f«a)rt^' teien btwtd'v for #Mi^. Thej notr 1«|j 1ig tteit fBe^*^ fem be<Mi^tt^riiiftf, trtily igtobmjT. They saw that our own peopt^ fldiiked to Fntince for c<)ttif6ftabte liTihg; Thej saw^nterprisrng-trftdeamcfnr' add manufltdt^ers fldickih| to ArtijfeHta. - They saw thellotfiteB hi and near Lodldtm uhtenantJMli. They ev^i^ywhiere heard of the decay 'df iratfe; aia of miilea Ikrtnfert. ^^^hey aawtbat vrithtftita Itfw'tb rais^'fi^prfcetf eot'it^fKci 'tftiHl«i' cMld^tlot Ifte' paidty ehhk^ hihd^ K^d dr'lehafft. They %Mw;iH short; that th^'wM bad cretted the dlW of Impossibilh/ to'Hv^Inf- peace ; while ^Fttince on one sfd^, M6 AiliM^ica on the other", held forth the teAi|)t^tion^ M libert^ and abundance. And they saw, which, olMierVef, wM' liiqt the smallest obj«Ct «^ their ti^ttr, that the laHdUtrds' and t^ifaiH^, in jrimoStcvfery^partof-theconntry, complaiif^ll «rf'' the hflfiHl^h}{i of hfihei', khd )$o!nted dirt -fh^' eteiiihpUbf Pf&iKi\'wHeire iglkei had been Molded. Th4y kno#' Ihat we h^^e ^^^nMoiftfi^^ daff. 'iidtitW l^uhds, or ISfUhUiions of rfoWanji'a YBAHv to pay m ■tkteifot emr\ being ^he interest of the' debt, instead of the mttt idiniom df pounds, 0^96 nlilKbns of dollars^ which we'hiid ta'^j[r^ tm thi^ yfc^nf he^tV thelifxt. They se^, that ib coi^qusn^e of th*mfci«aae:6f mdnstry ^^roduced b l^ahce by the tevolntlQii, iUnd oP6hrbiii^[ientiiiit«tecea^ ar^ ab# to «ell hi^^i>fna^kets'at lAdch'^ldis tbim half the t>rfe^ that^« tniat self atibrmut leave tfr6 faxi^s^aid. Thiiy^%^(6^«iH th^«t1ihigv. ^^vfmwyed #ith^a pBxAi} mti'Oie ^HJhmtk ism^* tviH hedomt as desert ati Aiat 6n #tik;h'GAptAilir-IiA^ii put'the poi^ fellow Jeff'f4eitiVh& Wa^^ilMd^by t^ Kii^ii^s of one of yotit- countryn^n ; and,itt>the'i%p,'hiBp{ired by their forebodings, th($y would, if they fciiuid, i«fide^ e^^^y :tfriertditn#^ too miserablefor tnan to liv^ in/ Tht^y dtr nWt fecon^mehd therediicing-of thb ttrinyto i^OiHt was bofor^^tbe war.' Th^ know that thfe wonld 'l^ot answer their purpose. They might re(:d#n)end the tedttction of the- Virt*y ; burthen, you stare" them in tl^.face* Tht ciiyH list is indispensable. Tfaey would recommend to wipe off the debt; but, then, the whcfb system crumbles toatoms. Their last riesonrce is, the hope, by their writing, to stir op the means of making other nations gtiU more mtetehed. ' '^''■ The state of this country, as regards the meatis of enjoying hap- pin^s, may be pretty eor^etly estimated bv this one fact ; name- ,lmei9 iff Wmim CloMeK, Et^, 8W lf\, tbftt ft noU^fhu been given, in ihe hwue of>coninqai, Urn; % v^etmrf^ wiU bfi proposed, eerlj in the n«xt sesaion, to it^ ixes is now so great, that- all but i/tm immenii^ fortunes are sinking und«r the weight ; and that^ too, with arpipidity that is quite astonishing. The necessities of the feyernntent require so large apart of every man's income and farniogfl, that nambers are seeking the means of escaping from the 4pQl>»a]Qpe, haye increased to thirty thotuand 1 Equal to njear- 1^ half the whole- population of iPhiladelphia, vhen I lived la. It. Thic fact appears to have been stated by Oeor^fr Rose, no iotroiluctory;to a measure for pHtiing a stop to the ev%L But how ? Would he send the- beggars to the country? We ftre overstocked already* Observe, > trifling as is this village, scarcely a day passes without bringijg one, and .generally more, beggars to my door. The vagrant act warrants us in taking them before a jostice, and having them punished. Biit whp will take the trouble, even if he wishes to do it I Thus «re they left to wander about. They swarm over the country like the vermin upon their own bodies'; and are produced by causes ciarly simip lar> '[ have here stated two striking facts ; my authority is the parliament itself. I state them /tere, ia the face of the country, and I thus invite contradiction if that be possiblet Let me, in this pl^ce, observe, however, that I do not look upon myself aa bound to refrain from making use of tlte press of AmericOf when J shall thfnk that I ought to state truths which I dare not stale h&'e ; but I never will send to that press, any thing, which ^even a federalist will not say, that I ought to be permitted to pub- lish infe ;, aifd^IT I<^ fixHiKn^, iMeit ^niafriiioat^ pkim* tiiiiY p^naltietvlo cdh'^hf iheth thrdiigh the pHeti«r df f Mi edUMry, M tlker# any rea-' 8on why I siidiiiiyildr'^dnve^ tMita tliroi^gh ther pretM^f A coutftr^^ where Hi6 ^roHikril! wbtMs publMbed at the Ha^e^ at Afn'sterBafhi At O^hei/tt, or elie^b^nre abftmd,' wiife neV^- regaifdi^ff ad gailty of foM ptdy ; btit, ^'t^^ttn^rj^j were, by mity I6v*r of frufB, a^^fetided for the a!*al #Mth urg- ed th^hi to HioH to iMh infi^hod of bvercomiingHib obdtadda i# itsj&rdtaui^atibd. * v .4 To rettirq now to the edtise o ' the Da'alicidtls ^ffdftir of Ibis i^ri* ters of ^hoitt I hav^ ^o ofTehf sbdk^h; attd to dri# yotir ftttentidif to which ^^flfbrts, » the ^itiiH^j^al dbje^t df thi# adrnsi|tibti from ^e work of Mr. CaHwright, I remun your friend, William Cobbett. P. 9. Binte writing ttie abov^ the peace between America and the AlgCrine dey has been aniiouiiced as a report. Perhaps your commodore had authority to make peace* Certainly, with Bbbb a poirer, cannon balls are the best negotiatora. Whether the pirates will abide by the treaty or not, if it has been made, your government has done itself great honour in the affair. This evient will not, however, give satis.^action till over the norld, Algiers was a sort of cur to be set on as occasion may require. HowcHvet, you hare broken his jaws, and made him retire to his den for the present. Thlp is truly a nol>le use to make of naval power L ItciBnol faU(li> enhance, jo *jr iwmef to give' pktMire lo your frieoda, udto edd to .the morliCUmtioo end vkidietiveiMM oC yonreneihiit. I I do ttot believe the newt, but if true, here is smiber thing. whioh Mr. Madiaon baa acconpllihed prevbuarto bia beii« ^'^d^pattV Betfej, aMb Joly, Ills. S<» Mr. John xkuflfmrighit theimplaeabh pumy qftyramyr-^. onfhtptiucebetwun England atiflAnurwi* DearSwy _^:| #Kroinp I proceed tpi the proposed subject of this letter, I tnuMcU right juat to notic^i ^hat I have, in addr^ng yq«i ooir, omitted the; addition of J^s^^, at, the end of your.na^ne. ,,lt ia Wouie high liaa^for us, k^ all t^oae w^a thinic aa ,ve.d(H -MK partake, io no tlegre.e whatever, in this sor^ of foolerji .ejipeciallys when we are writiqg, or. spe^kjqg ^pon the subject xiif. a. peafe* which has been' made with a, natiiqn^ whose Chief M^f^tiate {le^ve?, pretend^, to any title abov|B tljiat pf, "/e/ioiv cUisf^y* ^,hU|) i^\ fhares in ^>moion with ,ail the; peoj^e, qC the fiee< iaof 9|iir orators caUed the Americans, as he had before called the Eeforai^ crs, " a low and ,4^vaded crewt** having amongst, them " no' honourable. di^(incuotj^ j'* and he expressed his pleasure^ thai they were, f« he ^aid^ fighting on the side of our c;nemy* Theirr were, m hUi ey«M« so contemptible, that l;e was gladjwe hoil them for enemies^ and especially, as, in their chastisement, re- pvblicauism would be humbled in the dn^jt},^ BQt wholly d«* Btroyed. iitheri offmim Cohhtitf B^ ms Ba«h iiH^tfie lentiments of th#gitat«^^tH of the mXMtt at the time Wbon the Kinpi uid Pot^|etei Df Gerannjr piid m a Visit, and trh^n the '< hits of stt^d bmtins^* w^ Men M» tened ikndpr the royal flag on the Btrpmtint River, llkere ht^ . indeed, occurred, beGodi^ that tinD^ events, which, one #oifidliav« hoped, would have ch'ibcked this conttemptUoUt "wi^ «f tUnking* The defeat apd capture of the C/u^rHere, the Macedoninth }^ JdWt the Peacock, and divera Other imaller ships of war, by that re|>ublic, whose very name we aOTected to despise, might have been expected t fusion was kept up for two years, until the incdrsion hi the Chesapeake seemed to have closed the scene ; 'arid, you '%ill beair in mind, that, at that time, it waa tiie almost uniwrfcalopittioi^ thst our Regent would soon send out 'bjs Vkeroy t6 WAilhln|jtOB Olty. It was even at this very monient, however, that' the ?iAe iMgati to turn. The gallant^litttift army of repUblioami on the' Niagara frontier, had before pi^Ved» at Oiippen^a, that they were made of the same atuff that coniposed thcir anceitdrs ; and» at ^rt ErU, they now gave A second most signal proof ^of the same kind . While these never>surpassed acts of deittWion to country weire 'performing on the borders of^ Lakes Ontario and IBri^i Lake CbaflEt* plain exhibited a spectacle, 'which striiCk tith^tfififder allthe coii- tinent of Europe, and which, in ^ct, astounded every mav of sense here, who had before clamonred for the war. It is tr«e, that • this was only a rep^Uion of the! scenes exhibited the y«ar before on Lake JSrte, where, with an inferior number of men ^nd guns, the republican Commodore Perry had beaten and actilKUy Aip/tf red, the whole of our fleet under Gombiodore Barclay ; thft iill eyes #ere at that time fiji^d on thd' continent of Europe. The (expected fail of Napoleon, and the' real victories over him, made \lhe loss on Lake Erie (a loss of iminense importance, as is rtow ceen) to be thought nothing of. Our great object thett* was Na- iioleon. He once subdued, the republic, it was thoukht, would i« done for in a trice. To suppose that she would be able to itand against tis, for any length of time, appeared, tomost men, perfectly ridiculous. A far greater part of the nation thought that it was our army who bad put down Napoleon. Indeed, the commander of them was called, " the conqueror of France ;** and, it was said^ that a part < of the conquerors of France, sent to America, would, in a few tnonths, " rec^ucc" the country. A pMt of ^ii^,W«f«* arcordingl^, lent thUher ; f^d «ow we •rtfpifig ta vjtw tlwir^f ploiti f^oflt the i;epubUciuuf w.^^n bur- 4«n of JLi^ X^liMopUio*' TV governor general oi; .pfi^ftdtt, $|r i)«orge Pfevpvt, haviog rf ceivisd V>f reinfqrcqwanlp fiw», I'raqce, invaded ttie^l^public at tbe h^ad of 14,0(li(>. iiien» if UHj^te major g4r>«rai« wdfr ^Vn, Cpur trore« and 6>0P0 volunteep iwd militia frofn th^ ^la^^ of Veripont ind New- York) under the qqmoiand of ay/ery gatlafft ^a accom- pUabed citi^n, jiwed Jlffocomd, a brig^^ji^ geffjeral inj;he rjcpubli- IMU servicie. WJLiile $ir George rreiyost atta^kfjcl 4^9 lort by land Xoniiinodore |>owbjr WMeri^i^qotjl^'* iffU8tia|!9d. yBfit.op.the prater Mdei th« i;f pul^lipfui jConNnodpre Mf^f^onoug^y though ^ia 'tfopce mup}feriQr to ^,ura, and ji^^ ^en,y^> stqted.ifi Ih^- official jiefpaUh of ^r Ckotige Pre^o4i,/o»M^//,,npt oply 4#<^ge|#!rg|,i seeing the fjkte of the jfleet, •l(nowin(&!(h«t^ t^ivag <^ X\». fort after that W4)vild only Md jo a rJipee^y /^t^iiWiiSrffm i^apd^fpa^ing the copaequeoces of an attack \QQihia Wiiy .b»«kf1o Canada, ri^ised the siege, uqd hastened ji^^ck 'lof^rd? Montreal with atllinaginable speed, pursued ibyt ikP. liUlfe jrepMbticaftannyfc^p^leavUig behind ^ioi>iiiB the.nepublicaos fitfitie, ;9e quapiilies of stores^ ^ntmmiition, &c. beside, great nmn- ijers of pr i3on9rs and f|eB«rf«ra* Thu the duration of the mar. 49 ^ LetUiri of WilUtMl Cbhhia, tJii^. In (Be meanwhile, the nditiiBters, /> rifitoidtto to their knowledge of Ifre IbtUeB o^ ChippiBwa, Fort £lrie, l^lattsburgh, Lake Chanpiain, nod Jlort Mobile, bad put forward, at Ohent, very high preten* •jom. Hiey had taroposed, ag a SINE dUA NON, the ex- palsiDnoJf Ibe republicihs frdd^ a ccHisiderable pariidA nf theUr terrilori/i in behalf of fh^ s&vageB in alliance with m ; they had demanded, though not as a sine tflta nbUf the nwrendtr of tM jLakesio our King, ev^h t^ith the prohibition to the Amerieatisto erect fortificationa on thie borders which woald remain to them ; they had demanded a line pf communication between Quebec and our territories east of the Penobscot, through the territories of the Hepuhtic. Thfe American negotiators declined any dier> cussion of ^besc condifidn's, until they should receive insttifctiomf from their goveminetit ; alleging, and vttf joetly, that this wiis the Jirst time (bat any such grounds of Wii^, or depute, had been meiMioned by ua. These demands having l>6eh transmitted to the president, he, instead of listening to them, laid them before the congress, with an ^""[pressibn of fafs ihdignatkin at them ; and in this feeKng he appeared bn^ to haV^ anticipated hiii fallow citizens throughout the codntry, with the exception of a handful of aristocraticSl in- triguers in the state of . Massachusetts. New and vigorous hieasures were adopted for prosecuting the w^r. The congress hastened on bills for raising and payhig soldiers and saifors ; for making the militia more efficient; for expediting the buihiing of ships ; erecting forfific^tions ; providing floating batteries. In jshprt, it was liow cleaVly sieen, that the govfernmebt of die re- public wa:s equal to a time of War as well as to a time 6( peace ; that we Lad to carry on a contest, at 3,000 miles distance, against a l^rave,free, and gr^at Aatidn ; and that the aristocratical faction, d|) wbom 8om6 men h&d depended for aid, were sneaking offhit^ pitiiut subterfu^B, afraid any longer to shotr a hankerinig after our jcaube. , In thi^ state of tbings; with this prospect bef^fe them, the ministers wisely resdl^'ed to dbandon their demandsl and to make peace, leaving things as they stood before the mairi The oppo^ silion, who had pledged themselves to the suppot't of the war upon the old ground, that is to say, upon the ^ound of impress- mien t, began to protest again^ it upon the ground of con^ue^^ ; and if f^ war had cdntitiued, there is no doubt thiit they would )iave greatly emb(it'rass6d the midistry ifpon this subject, espe- jbiatly as the cdntiUiuation of the war was the only riemaining ex« cuse for The conllnnation of the ivar taxesy against which petitions were preparing in eVery part of the kingdom. Here we cannot *help observing ho\nr wis6 it was in Mr. Madison to make public our demands. If these hsid been kept secret till aCter the close of the war, ho# long might not that war have drawled oihT The J utters of William Cobbetft Eiq. 387 ^em^nds would nevery perhapsi have been knowp. How wise ia |it> then, in the Americana to have framed their government ii^ sucli M. way 9a to prevent miachievoua state secrets frqm existing ! How wise to have mad^ all their rulers reitlly respcnaible for their acta! How wise to secure, upon all important ppint^, d;)} op- peal to themselves ! The President was very coarsely fre9ted here by some persons, who ought to have icnown better, for hav- ing exposed the coiiferences. It was said to be an act unprecedented in a civilijied nation. "Civilised nationut* you vFUl perceiye', mean nations governed by kings and other hereditary sovereign9: and, in that sense, the Americans cer^inly are not a civilised nation. 3ut why should such papers be kept secret ? Of, at least, why shou^ they not be made, public, if the government chooses to make them public f When ouce a governo^qt had despatches in its hands, there is no law that deprives it of the liberty to make what use of them it pleases. P^uthing could be more fair than Mr. Madison's mode of proceeding. The aris* tocratical faction, whom we called our fiiends, were crying out for peace ; the whole of the Amorican people were represented^ in our newspapers, as disapproving of the w^r, and as wishing for peace on our terms. What, then, could Mr. Madison do more just and more candid than publish to the people the whole of those terms ? *' There they are,**, said he, '* decide upon them. Say, will you have peace upon these terms ? I am, myself, ready to perish, rather than make such a peace. Now, let me hear what j/ou have to say.'* A nation of free men agreed with him, that they would perish rather than yjeld (o such terms ; and, in- deed, rather than yield to us " one single point," though of ever so little importance. The result has been, that peace jias been made, and not one sinfjrle point has been yielded to us. We now come to the most important and most interesting part of our subject ; namely, THE CONSEdUENCES of this peace, made at such a time, and under such circumstances. Con- sidejred as to its probable and almost necessary consequences, it is, in my opinion, an event of infinitely greater importance to the world than any that has taken place since the discovery of the Art of Printing. Qut I will not enter further into the subject, till 1 have laid before you, or, rather, put upon record, for the sake of reference, some of the overflowings of gall, which this event has brought from the throats of th« sworn enemies of freedom. You have observed, that those public prints in England, which were the most bitter against Napoleon, have been also the most bitter against the American president ; a fact which ought to make people reflect a little before they give way to such outrageous abuse of the former, though ne must always regard him as a trai* tor to the cause of liberty, having married a king's daughter, made himself an emperor, and propped up and created kings, for the SftS Litters qf WUlMm Cohbetl, Esq, Ml^e of bra aod his family's aggrandizement. Still, it is clear, that the writers, whom I have now in ray eye, thought him man favimrable to freedom than those who have succeeded him ; be- cause, no sooner was he down, than they set upon the, American president with the lame degree of fury with which they had at- tacked Napoleon ; and they recomm^nded the deposing of him^ upon " the sams principle^''* they said, ithat (hey had recommend- ed the deposing of Napoleon* You wil) not fail to have observ- ed this, and to have traced it to ihi true source ; but I am afraid that it has passed unobserved by but too large a portion of the nation. There are several of our public prints, indeed, a very great majoiity of them, in country as well as in town, which have urged the justice and necessity of extinguishing the American government ; that ^* ill-organised association ;*' that " mischie- vous example of the existence of a government, founded on de- moeratical rebellion," This peal was rung from one end of the country to the other. But the print, which led the van in this new crusade against liberty, was that vile newspaper, the Times, to which paper we and the world owe no small portion of thos^ con- sequences which will result from the peace of Ghent, foHowed by such a war. This print was, upon this occasion, the trumps of all the haters of freedom ; all those who look with Satanic e^^es on the happiness of the free people of America; all thotie who bave been hatched in, and yet are kept alive by, bribery and corruption. To judge of the feelings excited in the bosoms of this malignant swarm by the peace of Ghent; to enjoy the spec- tacle of their .disappointment and mortification; of their alternate rage and despondency ; of the hell that burns in their bosoms : tp enjoy this spectacle, a spectacle which we ought to enjoy, af- ter having endured the insolence of their triumph for so many years ; to enjoj this spectacle we must again look into this same print ; hear their fvailing, view the gnashing of their teeth, see now the foam of revenge, and then the drivel of despair, issue from their mouths, teeming with execrations. With the help of the ministerSi we have, for once, beat the sons and" daughters of corruption; and if we bear our success with moderation, let us, at any rate, hear and laugh at the cries of our always cruelf and, until now, insolent enemy. It is right, too, that the repub- licans themselves should know what these wretches fiow have to say ; these wretches, whom nothing would satisfy short of the subversion of the republican government ; short of destroying that " mischievous example, the existence of a government, founded on democrutical rebellion." As far as I have been able to do it openly through the press, I have, during the war, as you will have perceived, made known the denunciations of these wretches against the liberties of America ; and it may not be less Letters of William Cobhett, Esq, 389 useful to make known their wailings, their feara, their derpair at the peace ; and the republicans of Amerioa ought always to bear in mind, that these same wretches, who are ready to gnaw theu* own flesh at seeing their hopes of destroying liberty in America blasted ; they ought always to bear in mind, that these same wretches it was, who praised, and who still praise, the condrjct of Governor Strong, Mr. Otis, Mr. Pickering, .Mr. Goodloe Harper, Mr. Walsh the reviewer, and their associates. The FA^DfiaALiBTS, too, amongst whom there are many worthy men, isSjk steadily at these facts ; and consider how it must stand wikH their reputation, when it is notorious, that all those in Enghnd who praise, or give the preference to them, i^<\ve beeti using their utmost endeavoiirs to urge this nation on to fight against America, juntil they saw " the world delivered of the mischievovs exam- ple of the existmce of a government, founded on the principles of democratical rebellion.** It is for the worthy part of the FeD£HALisTS to consider if these notorious facts square with their reputation, whether as republicans, as freemen, as faithful to their country^ or, even, as honest men. As to the Strongs, the Otises, the Goodloe Harpers, the Walshes, they have, in this way, nothing to lose. Every sound mind is made up with regard to them, and others like them ', but, I should think, that the praises of the Times newspaper must make the great body of the federalists look about them. We will now reperuse the articles, to which I have so often alluded. I will insert them, without interruption, one after ano- ther, according tu their dates, reserving my remarks, if any should be necessary, for the close ; and requesting you to pay particular attention to the passages printed in Italics, or ... CAPITALS. 29lh Dec. 1814 — " Without entering at present into the details of the treaty, ^on which we have much to observe hereafter,) we confess that we look anxiously to its non ratification ; because we hope an opportunity will be afforded to our brave seamen to retire from the contest, not, as Ihey now are, beaten and disgraced; not with the loss of -that tridentf which Nelson, when dying, placed in his country's grasp ; not leaving the marine laurel on the unworthy brows of a Kodgers ; bat with an ample and full revenge for the captures of the Gu^rriere, the Macedonian, the Java, and the numerous other ships that have been surrendered on the ocean, besides the wJwhJtotiUas destroyed on lake Erie and lake Champlain. Let us not deceive ourselves. These victories have given birth to a spirit, which, if not checked, will, in a few years, create an American navy truly formidable. They have excited in other nations, who foolishly envy our ma- ' ritime preponderance, an undisscmbled joy, at beholding our 'i course 80 powerfully arrested. Perhaps it would not be asserting a a^ Ldters pinion of our strength by seat tu thi victories of Wellington have enhinced that of our strength by land." 30th Dec. 1814.— <* The state of the funds may b^ said to af- ford a most strikiag comment oo the text of (hose who have the front to caU the treaty of Ohent ' honourable* to (his cgiuntry. "What ? An honourable peace wi,ih the last of our adversaries, with a populous and commercial nation, and yet a depression in the public funds ! The thing is impossible. There is a moral inconsistency in the facts. But the truth, unhappily, peeps out in the course of the eulogy bestowed on this famous specimen of diplomatic Ingenuity. The peace is, like (hat of Amiens, a peace o( necessity; and upon what grounds?' 'A leaning to certain points,* it seems, has been ' hinted' at the congress of Vienna. Noir, IcKia put this mysterious language info plain JEInglisb. It can bear no other construction than this, that Rub* flia, or Austria, or Prussia, has avowed an inclination to support the innovations on public hw, which Mr. Madison asseHs. Might DOt thi^ have been foretold ? Was it not foretold In this paper above six months ago ? Was it not the very argnment we urged, (br pushing the war in America with the utmost vigour, whilst yet the field was open, and our adversary without allies f And is it not a motive for the same conduct, even at this late period ? If any of the powers who have received our subsidies, or have been rescued from destruction by our courage and exam- ple, have had the baseness to turn against us ; it is qiorally cer*. tain, that the treaty of Ghent will confirm them in their resolu- ttbn. They will reflect that we have attempted to force our prin- ciples on America, and have failed. Nay, that we have retired from the combat with the stripes yet bleeding on our backs ; with the recent defeats at Plattsburgh, and on lake Champlain unavenged. To make peace at such a moment, they will think, betrays a deadness to the feelings of honour, and shows a timidity <^ disposition, inviting further insult. IF we could have pointed to America overthrown, we should surely have stood on much higher ground at Vienna, and everywhere else, than we possibly can do now. Even yet, however, IF we could but close the war with soiru great naval triumph, the reputation of our mari- time greatness might be partially restored; but to say, that it has not hitherto suffered in the estimation of all Europe, and, what is worse, of America herself, is to belie common sense and wiiversal experience. *■ Two or three of our ships have struck to a force vastly slJpe^ior !' No, not two or three, but many, on the ocean, and whole squadrons on the lakes : and their numbers are to be viewed with relation to the comparative magnitude of the two navies. Scarcely is then: one American ship of war which has not to boast a victory over the British flag ; scarcely one LdUTB of miliam Cobbett, Esq. ^k^ British ship in thirty or fortify that has beaten an Amerlean. Our seamen, it is urged, have, on ail occasions, fouji;h( bravetj* , Who denies it? Our cotnplaint is, that with (he bravest seOmerkj and th« most powerful Davy in tiie world, we retire from this contest when the balance of defeeA is so heavily against us. Be it acciAent, or be it misconduct, we inquire not now into tlM^ cause ; the certain, the inevitable consequencta are what tpre look to, and these may be summed up in a few words : the speedy growth of an American navy, and the recurrence of a new and mttch more formidable American war. From that fatal moment when the fla^ of the Ouerriere was strucic, there has been quite a rage for building ships of war in the United States. Their na- vy has been nearly doubled, and their vessels are of extraordU nary magnitude. The people, naturally vain, boastful, and inso' lent, have been filled with an absolute contempt of our maritime power^ and a furious eagerness to beat down our maritime preten- sions. Those passions, which have been in^amed by success, could only have been cooled by what, in vulgar, but emphatic Im- guage, has been termed * a soiuxd flogging ;* but, unfortunately^ our Christian ateekness has induced us rather to kiss the rcni, than to retaliate its exercise. Suc^false and feeble humanity is not calculated for the guidance of nations. War is, indeed, a tremendous engine of justice ; but when justice wields the sword> she must be itijlexible. Looking neither to the right nor to the left, she must pursue her bipw, until the evil is clean rooted out. This is not blind rage, or blinder revenge ; but it is a discrimi- nating, 9 calm, and even a tender calculation of consequencei)« Better is it, that we should grapple with the young lion, when he is first fleshed with the taste of our flocks, than wait until, io the maturity of his strength, he bears away at once both sheep and shepherd. The Chathani, of r4 guns, (built in memory oi the Walcheren expedition,) is ordered to be manned, and will, it is supposed, be sent to America, to strengthen the preparation* for that extended system of warfare, which must take place if the president should delay the ratification of the treaty. We are well convinced, that every ship, and every soldier, employed in main- taining the vital contest for our maritime ascendency, farfroDi di- minishing, will add a proportional weight to our infiuen(|e at Vi- enna ; but in, truth, Vienna, and all its fetes^ and all its kegotia- tions, are infinitely insignificant to us NOW, compared with the growth of an American navy, and the probable loss of our transatlantic provinces." ^ '^ 2d Jamiaryy I«15.— >*' The year which Is just concloded will r*ok among the most remarkable in history. It has seen the downfal of the most formidable despotism that ever threatened the security of the civilized world. It has witnessed the resto* ration of a PATBRNAIi GOVERNMENT to the country \ 3p •1 LeUera of William CobbelU E»q. which had for 0ve-aod- twenty jears passed through the greatest variety of afflicting revolutioos. It has beheld all the sovereigna of Europe aaseoibled personally, or by their representatives, i» peace^ to lay the foundations of permanent tranquillity, and to con- struct anew the social ediGce, by the proportions of equity and napderation. ONE WORTHLESS, FAITHLESiS HORDE ALONE PERSEYEREO in those alronous plans, which they had undertaken, in concert with the fallen despot, for their own selfish aggrandisement. Punishment hung over the guiUy heads of these men, bankruptcy had swallowed up their resources, de- ^air stared them in the face. It was hoped 'that some signal itistance of vengeance would have been hurled against them,' and that the year would have closed with the triumph o( justice and of Britain. ALAS ! We have been compelled to witness not only the fruetratbnof this hope, but the elevation of our calurani- ators and aSf'assins to the height of insolent exultation, on the ruins of our maritime greatness. THE NAVY OF BRI- TAIN IS DISGRACED FOR EVER: and, oh! shame! the f^me of the immortal Nelson is eclipsed by the vaunts of the vui< gar braggart Rodgers. A Sunday paper asserts, that the ratifica- tion of the degrading treaty of Ohent, by an iltustriouo personage, ▼as a duty MOST RELUCTANTLY PERFORMED We doubt it not. The truly English feeli gs which prompted so zealous an adherence to the cause of patriotism in Spain^ and to that of loyalty in France, must have been tortured beyond the power of words to express, by the fatal necessity (if necessity it was) which compelled the signing away the honour and future, safety of THIS ONCE NOBLE COUNTRY ! May the pre- sent year elapse without producing a confirmation of our sad forebodings ! Our firmest hope lies, in the present instance, as it did during the negotiations of Chatillon, in the arrogant insanity of our adversary. In mulish obstinacy, Mr. Madison is not a whit behind his great ally. In vanity and self-confidence, the FisKS, and Clays, and Smilies, and Wrights of the congreM cannot be overmatched. It is, therefore, the firm persuasion of those who best understand American politics, that the treaty will not be ratified. For this event, we repeat, i^overnment ought to be fully oprepared. The nation, too, ought to be satisfied, that a powerful army, and a general of the highest reputation, are ready en the SfiQt, either to compel the enemy to ratify the treaty, or to punish its non ratification. The officers of the class just specified have, moreover, a right to have their characters placed in a fair light before their countrymen ; for in all companies, for some time past, have been heard murmurs, not loud but deep, at their appa- rent backwardness to appeal in the field, where their services have been, a^l still are so much needed. If, contrary to our hopes and e3ipectatiofiS> thejreaty should be ratified, the coajiequeuces are /. i- ■:. :<. UtUrt •/ William Cfobheitt K$^ S03 «uy of development. The AmericaiM, vain of what fbej will eooilder u their demomtrated auperiority over uh by land aafl sea, will dream only of more audacious pretensions,' and new plana . 0f conquest. Their regular armjr will oe auemented, and pfatied en the Canadian frontier. 7%etr heavy metalled ahipst and new 9team balteriest will he multiplied mUh the utmost celerity. Thetr intrigues to stir up rebellion in Canada will be redoubled, and, anhappily, with a far greater chance than ever of success, inasmuch as the Canadians will be but too apt to conceive their interests sacrificed by the present treaty. All this while WfS SHALL BE BOUJ5D OVER TO OUR GOOD BEHAVIOUR IN EUROPE; for the moment we embark in mar here, the redoubt- able Captain Portbr will again hoist the tlag of FREE TRADE AND SAILORS' RIGHTS, and this wilt furnish at once a pre- fence and a signal for driving the hated English from Canada. How long the West-Indies will remain to us, after the loss of our I^orth- American provinces, we leave to the sagacious calculations of tboiie who can contrive a cheap and easy method of supplying our island? with flour, staves, and lumber, from other quarters ; or who will secure to us the Newfoundland Sahety, when we are ex- pelled from the whole American continent. Little has been added to what the public already know of the treaty. Indeed, we hava been assured, that what was 'circulated as the first slight iketcfa of Its contents, gave rather too favourable an idea.of it in two very material points, the Newfoundland fisheries, and the East-India trade. It was generally understood, we believe, that the Ameri- cans were specifically excluded both from the one and the other of these advantages ; but the truth is, (says our informant,) *' that neither of these points is mentioned in tiAa impolitic treaty." 7th Jan, 1815. — «Our correspondent (at Paris) states, thatsinc« the unexpected news from Ghent, the Americans at Paris have been every where TREATED WITH THE MOST MARK- ED RESPECT. They have, in general, assumed, at all pub- lic places, their national cockade, both as a means of attracting to themselves those attentions, and also to prevent their being mista- ken for English, and exposed as such to the affronts which of latf have been openly shown to our countrymen." ^ Thus have we before us the waitings of the sons and daughtera of corruption. There is, you perceive, one reigning fallacy in all these attacks on the peace ; that is, it is all along presumed, and ta^ea for granted, that our situation, with regard to America, would havt become every day better and better, if the war had been continued. Now, so far from this being any thing like certain, it was not even probable, and was barely possible. The chances were all on tht other side ; the republicans had not only resisted, but bad repulsed, the onset ; they had followed up their blows with astonishing rapidity ; and even at the moment when the «onctasion of tht 50 394 LeUert of William Cohhett, EBg» |)eace was announced, intelligencis came to hand that they bad just driven our army and fleet from Pensacola, a main hold, whence our next attack was intended to have been made. " If," says this trumpet of corruption, " our navy bad struck some great blow ; IF we had done'* this, and done that, and done the other ^ (ben we might have made peace. But IF we could do none of these ; IF we had failed in all our attempts ; IF wa had lost still more frigates and fleets, what would THEN have been our situation ? The malignant wretches are senseless with rage. They are savage at the loss of their prey. You, who are an old hunter of wild beasts, may have seen something in the con- duct of disappointed bears or wolves resembling tliat of these foes of freedom, who are now looking towards America, foaming with rage and roaring for revenge. It is impossible not (o feel great satisfaction at seeing the mur« deroua wishes of these men disappointed. But our satislactioa ought by no means to rest here. The great question with regard to the excellence of really free government has now been decided in a way that most inevitably produce conviction throughout the whole world. The fate of the republic of France had excited great doubts in the minds of men disposed to cherish liberty, as to the capability of tbataort of government to be carried ru in practif? for any length of time, especially if if had to contend with the difficulties and dangers of war. The enemies of liberty de- lighted in representing real freedom as incompatible with national defence and independence. When reminded of the government of America, they smiled, and observed, that it might do very well as long as Americc^remained at peace; but that her first year of war would crumble it into dust, and expose to the mockery of the world the vain theorists who had extolled it. In short, this Was the point always laboured at :—~TlMtfor a nation to be able to de- fend itself in time of war against a formidable enemyt it must have an almost despotic government, and a standing army, with all their ritinue. How sincerely will you, who have so long, so zealously, and so ably maintained the contrary, rejoice to see that this position, so degrading to mankind, has now been fully disproved ! You, in ^ur excellent publications, and Sir Francis Burdett, in his speech- es, have uniformly insisted, that the safe defence, and the only 6afe defence, of a nation against a formidable enemy, was to be found in the arnih of free men ; that, in order to induce a people to fight in defence of their country, they must feel that they have something to fight for; that the strength of a government, in the bctiir of real danger, consists solely of the attachment of tlie peo- ple ; that a nation, enjoying real freedom, informed by a press really free, and all having a voice in the choice of their represen- Letters of mtlinm Cobbitt, Esq. 393 ialives, nev^ jet was, and never would be, subdued by an inra- ding enemy. The rise, progress, and result of the American mars (I mean both of them) have now put the truth of these, your favourite uoc* trines, beyond all doubt. Where are now the knaves wb.< hava aO long scoffed at you as if visionary, and who have had the pro- fii£;acy to assert, that bribery and corruption were e8F>ential to tfficient government ? Where are now those who apf rehended annrehtf from universal stiff rage.' Where are now the sticklers for injlmnce and virtual representation ? In America every man who pays a tax, of any sort, however small, ha> a ^ote. He au- sists m electing,' not only the members of the state legislatont, and those of the congress, but al^o the governors of the stated^ and the president himself. No man has any authority, no man has any voice in making laws, who has not himself been elected, and in the election of whom every man paying a tax has a voice. Yet the world NOW SEES, that a government thus formed^ and a people thus governed, are a match for the most formidable power at this day in existence. The world now sees, that a nation thus governing itself, and fully sensible of its freedom, is not only active in its defence, but is capable of deeds of valour, such as were never before recorded by the pen of the historian of any country or any age. Let the advocates for (he buying and sell* ing of seats do away, if they can, the effect oTthis glorious example. The writer, whom I have above quoted, and who was so anxious to see " the world delivered of the mischievous example" of the existence of the American government, says, that our navy has been defeated ; that it has been beaten upon the ocean and on the lakes ; that we have been beaten by land and by sea ; that we have been disgraced for ever; that we have retired from the contest with the stripes on our backs; that we Lave had the tri» ^ent snatclied from us ; that we are scoffed at upon the /continent of Europe. Now, then, if this be true, who ia it that has thus humbled us ? Wi'.al mighty potentate has been able to accom- plish all this ? It is a reptibllc ; a nation whose chief magistrate receives only about 6,000/. a year, and the whole of whose or- dinary revenue docs not amount to so much as we, in England alone, p%y /or co/^cchn^ our taxes; a nation without a standing army ; a nation with a press through Which any man may publish any thing respecting any public person or measure, or any opi- nion on the subject of religion ^ a nation witbout dukes, or lords* or knights, or esquires ; and without any distinction of rank of any sort being known to the law ; a nation witbout an established church, without tythes, or any compulsory payment to the priests of any worship ; a nation where bribery and corruption are ub' known ; where no man calls another man *' master ;" and where 396 Ltllta of H^iUiam Cobbett, Esf, i handui'i of gold woukh not purchaie from the Ubouring nan \h€ pulling off his hat even to hia employers. The conttqwiMM of trutha M striking, and now so notorious, are much more pleasing to anticipate than they would, I imagine, be safe to describe. There are some who pretend, that the ropublic bM gained nothing by the war ; and those hireling gentlemen, who write ia <' the Quarterly Review^' tell their readera« that she has made peace ** without accomplishing any one of the objects for which she went to war." These hired critics are either wholly ignorant of the matter, or they are endeavouring to mislead their readera. At any rate, I will once more state the case, and then we shaH see which party has been baffled in its attempts. America declared war against our King, because be would not cease to impress persons (not being soldiers or sailors in the enemy's service) from on board her ships on the high seas. This was the ground of her declaration of war. A treaty of peace hat been made, and that treaty says not a TVord about the impressing of persons on board of American ships. Therefore, say these wise reviewers, she has not gained her object. Poor slaves ! they dare not look at the truth ; which is this : America went to war with us, while we were at war with Franiie, and while America was neutral. Our king having made peace with the French, there ceased to be any pretext for impressment ; and that being the cas^ America was willing to make peace immediately, without any stipulation about impressment, because the war io Europe having ceased, her character of neutral would have ceased, and our impressments would also have ceased. She wanted no stipur lation to protect her against what she always asserted to be a wrong, and which wrong she had resisted by arms, until it ceased. Accordingly, we find Mr. Monroe instructing the republican negotiators not to bring forward the subject, it being quite nn" necessary, seeing that America had resisted our pretjended right of impressment by nntr, and would, of course, resort to the same mode of resistance, if the execution of the pretended right should be revived^ You will observe, too, tbsrt it was our King*s negotiators, who brought forward the subject at Ghent. There- fore, if there was any defeat of object here, the defeat was on bis side. We went to war to assert our right of impressment. We have made peace without obtaining any stipulation with re- gard to that right, real or pretended. If we revive the exercise of this right, at any future time, Mr« Monroe, in his published despatches, says, that America is ready again to resist it by force of arms. ' The disappointed, malignant man, whom I have so largely quoted above, exclaims, that we are *' now bound to our good behaviour in Europe;" for, that the moment we dare to go to wup weabalihave Capt. Porter sally out upon us with '^freedom LeUer» ^ miliam Cobbttt, Kiq. 397 o/ commerce and eailora* rights** inicribed on hh flag. Nothing it more probable. Indeed, it ia quite certain, that the >* bita of atriped bunting" will bear thia motto, if our king revives hia or* dera of impresBment. But the likely thing ia, that his Majesty Will no/ revive those orders ; and then we shall have the happjioesa to see ourselves living in peace and friendship with the people of America, and shall 1^ grateful to hia Majesty for the bleuing. But has the republic gained nothing by the war ? Haa aht gained no English ships ? Has she gained no renown ? Have the afiairs of the Guerriere, the Macedonian, the Java, the Peacock, the Avon, those of Lakes Erie and Champlain, and Mobile and Pensacola, and Fort Erie and Fort Moreau ; have these memora* bie actioni, and many others, yielded her nothing in point of reputation in the world? Is it nothing to have been able, with her infant navy, to have reiiated with success the maritime power of England single handed ? Is it nothing to have called forth the admiratbn of the world by acts of bravery like that of the General Armstrong privateer at Fayal ? Is it nothing to have made her implacable enemies in England express their mortifica- tion at seeing her citizens in Europe complimented wherever they go, in consequence of her success against auch a mighty power? Is it nothing to have proved to the world, that, let who will attack her, ahe stands in need of no foreign aid ; no hired fightera of ether countries ; but that her own citizens are equal, not only to hjBr defence, but to the carrying of her " bits of striped bunting*' in triumph into every sea^ against even a superior force ? Is it nothing to have shown, that, in the midst of such a war, which most people thought put her very existence in jeopardy, she has doubled; nay, quadrupled, her naval force, including her numerous important captures from us ; and that she has steadily proceeded in the extension of her naval plans, buildings, and arsenals ? Is it nothing to have proved, that her government, though free as air, is perfectly adequate to the moat peiilous of wars ? Is it nothing to have thus entitled herself to the confidence of other ncMons, and made her friendship an object to be sedulously sought after by every power of Europe ; and to have done this, too, in a war in which it was published that all these powers had, by a secret article in the treaty of Paris, bound themselves not to interfere ? Is it nothing to have shown, that she wanted the interference of none of them; that she was able, single handed, to fight her own battles, and to come out of the contest, not only unmutiiated, but covered with glory ? Is it nothing for her chief magistrate ; for that very Mr. Madison, whom our malignant and insolent writers, and others, marked out to be DEPOSED ; ia it nothing for Ameri- cans to have seen this their pkiin fellow citizen, with a salary of less than 6,000 pounds a year, with no heralds, guards, or gilded tfoaches, conducting her affairs, through this trying season, with 388 Letten qf fVUlinm CobbetU Esq, Ro much abilitjr* lo much firmneai, and, at the aaroe time, witk tucb lemlernesa for liberty, aa to refrain from a retort even to th« mild law of hia country againat those who have made uae of that fiber ty for purpoaea of the blackest and basest treason ? la thii nothing, you venal English writers? Is tbia nothing? Is it nothing to hear the chief magistrate of a country say : *' let my calumniators alone ; let the traitors to freedom and America pro* ceed ; I rely on the good sense and the virtue of the people ; the cauae ia the people'a, and they will be my defendera V* It tkitf too, nothing gained ? Yea, it ia a gain, not only to America, but to mankind ; for who will now be impudent enough to assert, that politicitl freedom, that religious freedom, (hat a press wholly uncontrolled, are t»- €ompatible rvith national safety in limes of i»ar ? Who, Qpoo the ground of a probability of invasion, will call for a suapen- •ion of the laws made for the security of nien*s liberty and liveSf when the world baa now seen the republic of America declared in a atate of rigorous blockade, mighty fleets and armies at the moutha of her harbours and rivers, her soil invaded at several pointa, her towns and villages bombarded or plundered, and her capital itself in flames, without producing the suspension, even for an hour, of any law, and without arresting or diverting the ordinary and gentle course of justice for a siugle moment ? I need aay no more. Here is the object on which the friend of freedom will rivet hia eyes. Here is a dagger to the heart of tyranny ; and, as such, it is worthy of being presented to you. ' The total overthrow of the aristocratical faction in America ; an ^ immense emigration to that country ; her consequently rapid increase of population and power ; the creation of a great maritim* force in the republic ; the independence of South America. These are amongst the consequences to be expected | but that consequence which I copsider of more importance than rH the rest, is, the benefit which the cause of freedom will receive from |he example of America, now become so conspicuous a nation* Away, now^ with all their trumpery about Poland, and Saxony, •od Belgium, and the Congress of Vienna ! Let them do what they like with the Germans, and the Cossacks, and the Dutch ; let them divide them and subdivide them in any manner that they please ; let them whisker them or knight them according to their uncy. We can now look to growing millions of free and en- lightened citizens, descended from the same ancestors, and speak* Ing the same language, with our&elves, inhabiting an extensive and fertile country, tendering food and freedom to the miserable and oppressed of every other clime, and a PRESS for the promulgation of those truths iwhich these unfortunate beings have Ho long been compelled to suppress. LeiUrB (if William Cobhett, Btq. 39d * i. uh, with the gre^iteat regard and reapect, your faUbful and moat obedient aervant. li William Cobbbtt. [Thii letter hai nerer before appeared in priut, as far aa ve can diioovtr. W« l^eeivcd it, in maniiioript, aliout the ihidc time that we learnt our propotala fo^ publishbg Cubbell't l^ettera had been received in Bngland. Th* reaaona for lup* pretaing thia letter in the Kcgiiter, we oannnt nnderatand. We received it ia ■ mutilated statei and there wei-e about twenty iinei wliicli we were utterly unable ta Ajeipher. It was addruaaed to the Pabliihera of Cobbett'a Lettera« in an envelope irith4»at a line Meonpanjriug it] .« TO THE EA8L OF UVBRPOOL. ' ■; My Lord, WiTHiif the last week I have received a bundle of Anie> fican newspapers, for which I am indebted to a gentleman of that country, who left them with my publisher, with the remark, that he did not wish to see me ; that I was personally unknown to him, but that he presumed I would turn them to good account. I really did not know what better account I could put them to, than to peruse them instantly, and inform your Jordship of thei^ contents. ^ > The first paper I laid my hands on, was, what they call lo 'America, a country paper, and ia published twice a week : it wat headed, in large capitals, GLORIOUS NBWS! UNPA- RALLELED VICTORY ! obtained by the AMERICAN ARMS, under GENERAL JACKSON, at NmOrltam, This, naturally euough, caught my attention, and without dis- turbing another of them, I sat down to read it, thinking that you might like to hear what kind of a story Jonathan told of this battle ; very little of which, as regards matter of fact, has as yet come to the ears or understandings of the enlightened people of this island. Should I tell you that it was with astonishment that 1 read of this unexampled defeat and carnage of the forces, under MajorGeneral Pakenhara, the brother-in-law of our own immor- talized living general, the Duke of Wellington and Marquis of Talavera ; should I so say, I, who have so often told you, so often forewarned you of what would be the fate of all the armies you should send to America, should I own to you my astonish- ment at their being beaten and driven off the' field by a Yankee general, what would your lordship think ? You certainly could not suppose, that in thia hour of your mortification I would at- tempt to insult your feelings, by presuming to flattei' you ; or* that I would give you credit for plans and operations which have met every disaster, by saying that they merited otherwise. No, indeed, it is from no insulting motive of flattery, against which, I 40d Lelimv of William Cobbdt, Esq. know your deadly antipathy, but from real downright froth that I ROW declare to you, that when I read this disastrouB account, astoniahment is but a weak word to express my feelings. My lord, I was amazed ! I was under the agony of an ague, and the very highest paroxysm of fever. I, who have ever said, from the day of the sailing of the 44th and 85th regiments, under Ge< iieral Ross, that they only went to meet disgrace ; and which has proved as sure, as many other things which I have told you. I, who have ever and anon, been repeating to you, that your sap- pers, your miners, and your rocketmen, were nothing at all in comparison to a Kentucky rifle, iu the hands of a back'Woods- man ; shall I again own it, even I was amazed. I will not im- pose upon you, by saying, that I did not most religiously calcu- late, that the whole army under General Pakenham would be beaten, had they been,twice the number : and you must recoffect» my lord, that I deprecated the cruelty of sending men from th.e continent to America, who were but just panting from their fights and fatigues in Spmn and in France ; yet, although I calculated on their being beaten, I did not expect to see them shot down, one hundred men, rank and file, for one of the enemy. No, thi? would indeed be arrogance, should I say it ; it would be assutoin^ a foresight for disaster, of which, I assure you, I have no pre- tensions ; and had I ventured to predict it, I should have merited a strait waistcoat. But as I said, I really expected all your forces would be beaten. I expected to hear of hard fight- ing, and a bloody business on both sides, but I candidly confess that I never dreamed of hearing of a slaughter of five thousand British troops, and that in all this havock, the enemy in killed and wounded, should not exceed twenty-three solitary militiamen. This account, if it was not corroborated by such testimony as would silence the moat sceptical, I would put behind the fire. It trould be a pleasure to me if I doubted it ; but I assure you it looks to be too true ! Such a havock as this, was never before made in a British army. The American papers state the force landed, as being only between nine and ten thousand men, one half of which was killed. We had the opinion here, that this force amo;inted to sixteen thousand men ; had it been thirty thou- sand, it would have shared the same fate. This military miracle, for I can call it nothing else, leally pla- ces all Buonaparte's former victories in the shade ; they bear no comparison ; in a word, it has not its parallel any where. The strongest fortress that ever was besieged, Gibraltar itself ; refer to history my lord, I beg of you, Tor three hundred years, and see if you find any thing like it. Gracious God ! It is too shocking for animadversion. Half a dozen more such expeditions, and I fear we should have scarcely men left to walk the parade at St. James's, or to change duty at the Horse Guards. Leliers of William CohheUf Esq* m ^ And now, are you not satisfied that I hjtve not been your ene> iny, as many of your particular friends and advisers would have you think me ? You must not cast blame upon me, because I did not tell you that this dreadful unprecedented catastrophe %ould be the result of your expedition to the southern cojist of America. You mus^ acknowledge you never informed me of its destination, or what was expected from it ; indeed, if you had so far condescended, although 1 should, without doubt, have fore- warned you that it would have met defeat, I never would have gone so far as to say, that the whole army, or the greater part of it, would be killed, without scratching their enemy c And here, I must not omit mentioning the reward which the American congress bestowed upon their gallant officer, General Jackson. GaUant, I am forced to call him, although he has been our severest enemy. I find in the paper before me, of the 6th of February, (the latest I have,) that Mr. Troup, a deputy from Georgia, recommended the adoption of a resolution, that the thanks of congress be presented to General Jackson, and, through him, to the brave officers and men under his command ; and that the president be requested to cause a gold medal to be struck and presented to him. This resolution was twice read, and referret} to the committee of the whole house, and I regret that I have not the papers which confirm it, although I have no doubt but that it met a unanimous adoption^ This is the reward which the American government are in the habit of showing to bravery ; and the bravest man in it neither looks for, nor expects, a greater remu* neration. Had General Jacksbn been less skilful, yet, had he &hown perseverance, bravery, and patriotism, he would have re- ceived the approbation of his countrymen and his conscience, though, perh'ips, not the thanks of congress. But alter the posi- tion, and let us suppose that Sir Edward Pakenham had been suc- cessful ; what would you and the British parliament have done for Sir Edward? \yould a dukedom have been too much for him had he gained possession of the embouchure of the Mississippi, that great key to ail the commerce of the western states, even to the heart of Pennsylvania ? Would the dukedom of Orleans, in reversion, with a grant of as many thousand pounds sterling as there are stars in the firmament, been too much, in your imagina- tion, for the man who would have possessed himself of this magi- cal padlock and key, which opened or closed at pleasure, the gates of all the commerce of a country seven times as large in exiont as England and Scotland together ? And yet, ray lord, the American general who defended this all-important passe par tout, more important than that of j'our secret cabinet, and who, in defending it, gave such a lesson of military self defence as never army of the earth received before, is, doubtless, well contented, satisfied, and grateful, with the thanks tf his countrymen ; and I 51 402 L^ers qf WUI^iam CobbtU, Esq, wouU wager that he tsIucs the little gold medal, io weight not abore a doubloon, full as much, or more than you or your generals vrould Talue the dukedom and the estate. This is neither more nor less than the effect of education and habit. The AiQerican oflScer, or private, when he takes the field to d?f<9nd his country, has but oue object in view — to do his duty. Aggrandijsement, military or civil honours never trouble his imagination : he has enlisted to 6ght, and fight he will ; if honours accompany his exertions, so much the better. Pensions, places, and pecuniary recompenses, are, as yet, unknown amongst this people ; and I should not be sur- prised, on the disbandment of the army, if General Jackson him* self should return to the ranks of private life, without one six- pence more pay than that which his commission entitled him to. There are various excuses to be made for yout^lordshjp in this late warfare, as well as for Don Quixotte .when he fought the windmills — ^you had both mistaken your adversaries ; but there is one excuse, to wit, that of taking wholesome advice, which you cannot lay claim to. Had the Knight of the Rueful Visage lis- tened to Sancho, he had not been unhorsed ; and had you listened to me, you had not been prostrated with the Prince Regent's Speech in your hand, promising to close the war with glory tp thd arms of England. My lord, there are men who will not take ad- vice from those who are able to give it them ; among the number *' I reckon," as they say in America, yourself. Had you known these people whom you dreamed you could flog into submission but half as well as I do ; had you known their thorough contempt . for pomp, for grandeur, for titles, and for many other things which your lordship's generals, as well as your lordship, prize above all other considerations, you never would have been led into the error of thinking, that by threats, by rods, or by bribes, you could suc- ceed in subduing them. I reassert it, my lord ; they are a won- derful people, and such you must admit you have found them. There is not such a people in the world beside : and the reason . ; they are such a people, is, as I have oftentimes said before, that fach man feels his independence ; he has not in this world a superior, whom he regards or looks up to with awe. Not that this Eeople do not do justice to talents and virtue ; they respect and onour them, but they worship them not ; indeed, they rather watch them, knowing that superior talents, if misapplied, may mislead and do much injury. They regard with reverence and awe, nothing less than the Dkinity, or his image upon earth ; and if they have a weak side, on which they can be assailed without suspicion, it. is this one. The clergy, and the clerical officers, are held, throughout this extended region, in more respect than the established clergy of ous country are in England. The rea- son is obvious : with them they have hitherto been the pastors aiid protectors, th^ advisers JiiiGl the (risodf |^aod| iiader t^ mach *. -,,>- ■*^- iMUrs of William Cobbett, Esq, tie of the lacred order, thej have bouad the will ai well m the duty. With n it ii different : the abaaeii of religion are more apokenof amuag m tbao its benefits. Hence it is, that if these people have a weak point, it is here you must look for it ; and I Lave already observed and remarked on it in the state of Massa- chusetts, in different letters I have written, which, I trust, may do good in opening the eyes ###**#•#•♦ {About ten lines defaced.) * »# * * the poorest man in (his country cherishes the - idea that hb son has as fair a chance for the highest offices as the richest man's son in the land ; and General Jackson himself, who has certainly achieved a greater land victory than any your lordship can cite from all the numerous bulletins of slaughter, in the archives of ♦♦•**•>, never was educated for a military life, nor did bis father before him ever dream that his son should im- mortalize himself at the cannon's mouth, or in the deadly breach. These acts, and this spirit, which display themselves among thb people, are^ momentary ; what their dJration may be, hencefor- ward, will depend much upon the policy of England : they are now approximating to a military people ; if you fan that flame, my lord, I will not answer where the conflagration shall cease. I never get into America, but my subject runs away with me ; I am obliged to return to my starting post. Here lays the map of this surprising country, and its extensive environs, which Sir £d< ward Pakenham was to have subdued. I trace with my finger the meandering* of the Ohio, from its junction with the Monongahela and waters of the Alleghany at Pittsburgh, down to -— -, its falling into th£ Mississippi stream, nearly a distance of 3,000 miles. Here, indeed, I must own you made a bold move, to say the least of it, when you directed the attack against NeW'Orleans. What, my lord, are you doubtful of the boldness of this measure ? Of the grandeur of tFais conquest? Next to your taking posses- sion of the mountains, valleys, and level land, in our sister planef, by a squadron of balloons under Garnerin, it certainly would have proved the most entertaining circumstance, and the most produce tive of astonishing events, that has enlightened us within the century. 1 have said, that General Jackson was not educated for a mili- tary life ; 1 made the assertion, which is uncommon with me, without br;ing positive as to the fact; but taking it for granted, that affairs, a? regarded military minutiae, on the breaking out of the war, weri; pretty nearly as I left them in that country, I consi- dered that I did not hazard much in saying so ; however, in pe- rusing mj newspapers, (and I write as I read, with the view of jiding information,) I met with an account of this said General iackaon'a career, and it confirms what I have before said. The account 1 have read is taken from a paper printed in Virginia, 404 Xjellers of William Cobbett, Eaif. 11 m called the Jlichmonil Inquirer: It ttAtes that be was born in North Carolina, and educated for (he bar ; that he was amemtmr of the Tennessee convention; then» a uieaaber of assembly; and, afterwards, a senator of the United States ; since that, a judge of the supreme court i^ that after having filled this station with honour, he turned his attention to military life, and soon rose to be a major general of militia. The account speaks highl)( of his private character and disposition, and states that be is about fifty 'five years of age. f* '^ This is the way, my lord, that these people make their gene- rals ; or, rather, I should say, this is the manner they have hitherto made them. We have our black gowns, and wigs With three tails, our counsellors, our barristers, and judges, but we rarely see any of them turn out, and take the tented field. As regards wigs, no man in America, that has hairs enough to keep his head warm, whether he belong to the bar or the pulpit, ever thinks of trou- bling a periwig*maker's shop; with us, we cbll them perfumers. Yet, althuugh>they don't wear wigs, they are not without wits ; and I assure yoq, that they esteem the inside of the head as of much more value than the out, I have repeatedly mentioned, whether I am believed or not, I can't say, that you can scarcely find a man in that country who cannot read and write ; «nd that th^ village blacksmith is frequently seen to put down the Gazette, to shoe a traveller's horse. Thus it is (hat General Jackson, after having been a member of a convention, a member of assembly, a senator, and a judge, commences, in what we would call the de- cline of life, the ** duous profession of arms ; and this, with mo- tives very different from pecuniary ones ; for his private fortun is said to be independent. Now, I believe I might assert, that Buch 9n instance is not found among us once in fifty years, and I am inclined to believe, they would be scarce, even in the alarm of French invasion. It really would be ludicrous to see some of those non-descripts we meet with at Doctor's Commons, perform- ing the manual under a drill sergeant. My lord, history has hitherto confined herself to the Maid of Orleans, and the exploits she performed against our Henry's ge- nerals, Talbot and Salisbury. Hereafter, it will speak of the Man of Orleans, and it is as well we should know who he was ; and although rot, like the maid, inspired by a religious phrensy, he was certainly inspired to do us more mischief in one fatal hour than a twelvemonth can repair. Whatever idea you niay have pf my heart, I assure you, in the language of sincerity, it aches on this occasion. Would to God, I had not to record it ! This battle has cost me some agonies, in common with many others of his majesty V subjects. The British troops, on that day, immortalized themselves for their bravery ; never was more heroic SAllantry displayed by ujen. The Americans themselves attest it ; Letlera bf William Cohhdt, Esq* 405 «i< and there were brave spirits who fell on that field, deserving of a better memorial than the temper of the times can now afford them, whose valour should live in marble and in brass. : Mj lord, we have met dreadful humiliations in this contest the supreoiacy of the British flag has been destroyed in the eyes of all £urope, and, what is still worse, in our own. All our de- monstrations by land, have met with disaster upon disaster, not to say disgrace, except in one solitary instance — I mean the attack upon the capitol of Washington ; and here we displayed a fero- city in setting fire to the president's house, and burning a library, for which the Americans pretend to apcuse us of Vandalism. Notwithstanding all the injuries at home and abroad, which this unnecessary war has inflicted on us, the Times paper, when it heard that peace had been concluded at Ghent, instead of rejoic* ing, was the first to throw a firebrand in its face. ** Let us'* says the Times, " yet see one of our first generals sent out. Let us behold a British force in America, capable of intimidating Madi- son and his congress. Let us hope to see the war concluded with one blow, that may not only chastise the savages into present peace, but make a lasting impression on their fears." This is the language held out to deceive, and to irritate passions which should be assuaged. What would the Times want ? What kind of ge- nerals I What kind of armies would he send out to subdue that country, which he considers as easily intimidated as the island of Jersey or Guernsey ? Have we not had generals of the first talents, and the best of veteran troops employed T What a Drnmmond, a Ross, a Pakenham, and a Gibbs, could not perform with a hundred thousand men, who could ? Had the Duke of Wellington been at Orleans, what would have prevented his sha- ring the fate of Pakenham ? He has no more claim to invulnera- bility than another man, and a Kentucky rifle would no more have missed fire, if directed against him, than against another — ^its mark it never misses. The American papers state, that the watchword and counter- sign of the English army was, booty and beauty ; for the honour of English officers, I doubt this statement. If one brave man was alive, who fell on that field, I could ascertain the fact ; and if I found the statement false, I would desire the Americans to con- tradict it, which I am convinced they would do upon a refutation properly authenticated. These people are generous as well as brav e ; they have displayed their generosity in many instances, which must have made an impression even upon yourself: they would use their best endeavours to take the life of their enemy ; but they would no more strip him of his honour than they <"ouId a wounded soldier of his shirt This assertion of the American newspapers is a stigma on all the military of the kingdom. As you, my lord, can easily ascertain the fact, I beg of you, if found. S ■^f^ Lelt&$ &f WiUiam CohhtttyEH^, «i I btlieve if, • aritstefoment, liiat yoa wflr, feir armfy coDtradict it And noir, before I cloie this letter, which I intended AoiiM iM lire yoo, being written on i lotnect which I entered ubon withptin. • • * * * ♦ *• * * * »♦♦' {Men tmtlve Imef , and upmnrds, ar§ entirdy defaced, ani 'm^ «Nf emjf connHtionme ready*--^ cormpted majority denationaliaei 4 itate, and weakena ita energiei. {Another break of about evt imti.} Fortune has apparently been propitioui-^what wa hav4 loat by one oonteit we have guaed by another. Let na not Iota tlua abo. I adjure you to reflect oo what ground it ia We ptand— 4( few miiateps, and we might find oandven phinged intomiieriei, agaiMt which there ia no combath^, and no retreat. AboTie all, let me impreas upon you, to be tjncere in this paqi- ficatbn with Atnerica; endeavour to forget that the evefhad^Deen a colony to Great Britain. This is the most pernicibuB recollec- tion we have among as ; and I know that among nrany of your counsellors and bosom intimates, and even by many members of the royal family, this ridiculous recollection is still mamtainad^ and the idea stHl cherished, that she might become so again. It. is an illusi ', ani unthf matiooaliaiNl f aboia iU It wi have OB BOt loM teptand— 4 [tomiMriM, in this paci* Bi^ half Wa in recoUee* ny of your nembera of maintained^ again. It loin atamp. hich I fore- ritain #irer igb-minded 'petty offi- an authoro in making li hold the liBaatera of lieve that a }r the bet- bnclnsion ; my lord, lad better Botiey i« mfineraent pK caution you not to drive the people of America to become s manufacturing nation ; should you do this, you lose a third of ▼our strength. You may consider this as a preposterous idea ; but I assure you I see symptoms of their becoming one mifch earlier than I ever inu«ined. This has been one of the many serious evils resulting from the misunderstanding with America; I view it as one of the greatest; and should you have any doubts on this bead, you may easily satisfy them, my lord, by engaging an able linguist in all our various vemacul^ tongues, and travelling through the different manu{]^cturing towns in England and Scot- land, when, I engine, you shall find my fears are not without foundation. I am, my lord, yours respectfully, Wm. CojiUBTT. ■!%■ F I IT I B. man who >re truths an liviDg, le wishes commer- f)g. The can pre- ord, need d, but it ted. Let