,."8^.. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I 1.25 IB 1^2 6" 2.0 1.8 U llllli.6 V Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14S80 (716)872-4503 i/. % ^ CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICIVIH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de nticroreproductions historlques Technical and Bibliographic Notas/Notas tachniquaa at bibliographiquaa The institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked below. □ Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur I 1 Covers damaged/ D D D D D D D Couverture endommagie Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaurie et/ou pelliculAe □ Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque I I Coloured maps/ Cartes g6ographiques en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ ReiiA avec d'autrej documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior irargin/ La re liure serrie peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsion le long de la marge intirieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela Atait possible, ces pages n'ont pas ix6 filmAes. Additional comments:/ Commentaires supplAmentaires: L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaira qu'il lui a M possible de se procurer. Les details do cet exempleire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du pdint de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la mithode normale de filmage sont ino.quts ci-dessous. r~n Coloured pages/ D This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est filmi au taux de reduction indiqui ci-dessous. 10X 14X 18X 22X Pagea de couleur Pages damaged/ Pages endommagies Pages restored and/oi Pages restaur4es et/ou pellicui^es Pages discoloured, stained or foxei Pages dicolor^es, tachetAes ou piquAes Pages detached/ Pages d4tach6es Showthrough/ Transparence Quality of prir Qualiti inigale de I'impression Includes supplementary materii Comprend du materiel supplimentaire Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible I — I Pages damaged/ r~n Pages restored and/or laminated/ rjn Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ I I Pages detached/ rjn Showthrough/ I I Quality of print varies/ nn Includes supplementary material/ rn Only edition available/ Th< toi Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmec? to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure, etc., cnt M filmAes A nouveau de fapon & obtenir la meilleure image possible. Th< poi ofi filn Ori b«( the ■io oth lira slo ori Thi aha TIN wh Ma diff •nt befl rig» raq mei 26X 30X / 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X aire i details lues du t modifisr gar una I filmaga Th« copy filmad h«r« has b««n raproducad thanks to tha ganarosity of: Medical Library IMcGili University Montreal Tha imagaa appaaring hara ara tha baat quality posaibia conaidaring tha condition and iagibiiity of tha originai copy and in Icaaping with tha Aiming contract spacificationa. L'axampiaira fiim* fut raproduit grAca i la gAnirositA da: Medical Library McGIII University Montreal Lan imagaa suivantaa ont 4t* raproduitas avae la plua grand aoin, compta tanu da la condition at da la nattat* da l'axampiaira film*, at an conformiti avac las conditions du contrat da filmaga. idea Original copiaa in printad papar covars ara filmad baginning with tha front covar and anding on tha last paga with a printad or illuatratad impras* sion, or tha bacic covar whan appropriata. All othar original copiaa ara filmad baginning on tha first paga with a printad or illustratad impras- sion, and anding on tha laat paga with a printad or illustratad impraaaion. Laa axamplairas originaux dont la couvartura an papiar ast imprimia sont filmAs an commandant par la pramiar plat at an tarminant soit par la darniAra paga qui comporta una amprainta d'imprassion ou d'lllustration, soit par la aacond plat, salon la caa. Tous laa autras axamplairaa originaux sont fiimte an commandant par la pramlAra paga qui comporta una amprainta d'imprassion ou d'illustration at an tarminant par II darnlAra paga qui comporta una talla amprainta. Tha last racordad frama on aach microficha shall contain tha symbol -h^ (moaning "CON- TINUED"), or tha symbol V (moaning "END"), whichavar appiiaa. Un daa symbolaa suivants apparaTtra sur la damlAra imaga da chaqua microfiche, salon la cas: la symbols *»> signifia "A SUIVRE", la symbols y signifia "FIN". ire ly errata it to nt ne pelure, ipon d 32X IMapa, platas. charts, ate. may ba filmad at diffarant reduction ratioa. Thoaa too iarga to ba antiraiy Included in one expoaura ara filmad baginning in the upper left hand comer, left to right and top to bottom, aa many frames aa required. The following diagrams illuatrate the method: 1 2 3 Lea cartas, planehaa. tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 1Um4m A dee taux da rMuction diff Arents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atra raproduit en un seul ciichA, 11 eat fiPmA A partir da Tangle sup4rieur gauche, do gauche k droite, et do haut en baa, an prenant la nombre d'imagea nicaasaira. Lea diagrammea suivants illustrent la mAthode. 1 2 3 4 5 6 '^Qn ' 4-^ END TO END ANASTOMOSIS OF INTESTINES BY MEANS OF THE MURPHY BUTTON. BY JAMES BELL, M.D., Surgeon to the Royal Victoria Hospital ; Consulting Surgeon Montreal General Hospital ; Professor of Clinical Surgery, McGill University. {Reprinted from the Montreal Medical Journal, Janvvry, 1895.) END TO END ANASTOMOSIS OF INTESTINES BY MEANS OF THE MURPHY BUTTON.* By James Bell, M.D., Surgeon to the Royal Victoria Hospital ; ConsultinK Surgeon Montreal General Hospital : Professor of Clinicir Jurgery Moflill [Iiiiversity. I am able to ivport three cases in which I liave used tlie Murphy liutton to securii end to end union of intestine at'tei- resection. In two the results were conjpletely suc- cessful and most satisfactory. In one thus made there was non-union, slouginng of the apposed ends of the bowel, escape of contents and death from peritonitis. Two of the three operations were upon the same ])atient, and it was the second operation upon this patient which proved fatal. I am, therefore, enabled to present specimens showiui^ (1) the union which had resulted from the first operation, as well as (2) the sloughing of the bowel which resulted from the second operatiori. This case is, moreover, a most interesting and puzzling one from a pathological stand- point, although I wish for the present to direct attention specially to the use of the Murphy button. The second case was one of femoral hernia, in which 39 hours of strangulation had produced complete gangrene of the extruded loop of liowel. Until very recently such cases were the hefe noir of the surgeon, and the question • Read before the Montreal Medioo-Cnirurginal Societyt November 3()th , 1894. ' " Wluit shall l»e 14th of -Ttily, vvlien ho was seized with faint- ness, and hccanie quite pah;. This condition histed all the afternoon, and the patitMit stated that he knew fi'oni his past experiences tliat he was about to have a haMuorrhaj^e, and within a few hours a lai-ge quantity of chirk clotted blood was passed per rectum. I now advised operation, to wliich lie readily consented, and on the 19th of July 1 opened the abdomen in the n»iddle line below the uiid)ilicus and directly over the part at which the mass had buen felt, although it had disappeared with the free evacution of the bowels and had not since been discoverable. Two loops of small intestine, each acutely bent upon itself, were found attached to a mass which overhung the brim of the pelvis. These were carefully separated, when it was fou'id that they both connuur.icated with a free cavity, bounded pos- teriorly by the ina.'s altov o mentioned, and in which lay a long irregular mass of inspissated f.iHcal matte)'. The ob- struction was at the upper of the two acutely bent portions of the ileum, and the bowel above this angle was three times as large as it was l)el<)W it. Over a space of two inches in length, and involving one-third of the circumfer- ence of the bow(d the wall of the gut was entirely absent. This portion was excised and the ends united by the Murphy button. At the lower attached loop the destruc- tion of the bowe) was less, being about one inch in length, and involving a narrow strip along the mesenteric border. These deficiencies in the wall of the bowel were apparently the result of a destructive ulcerative process. It was from this point that the hemorrhages had occurred, and a small artery, which was ulcerated through, bled very freely. The vessel was ligatured and the opening in the bowel closed by a continuous Lembert suture running obliquely from the mesenteric border to near the free border of the bowel. This, of course, narrowed the lumen of the gut somewhat, and gave me some, anxiety as to the possibility of tlie passage of the button, which, it will be noted, was on tlie proximal side of this suture. My only alternative, however, was another resection and end to end anastomosis, and T tlrcitlfil to Icavo it, as it wiis, as T liml still to turn niv attention to tlif i.iass ovrrlwuifjin;^ the pelvis, anil wliicli lmt'i'Hte< I upon, ('aret'nl examination of the mass hd me to the conclusion that it \v»is sim))ly cicatricial, and that it did not involve any other pai-t (»t' the intestinal canal. 'I'lu; sul»se(|uent history shows that f was wrou"^^ in till) conclusion arrived at, us to the chai'actcr of the mass, hut ri^ht as to its not tlu'ii involving,' any other portion of the bowel. The patient made an exoellent recovery, and after a week or ten days his bowels moved i-eijfularly and he pas.sed lareen located in the lowermo.st portion of tlu' sinitioiiSi he wmh perfectly ooiiit'ortalilo. AltMut 2 pni., on the I4tli, (4S lioiirs after operation) the patient was sei/,e»l with very se\ere j)ain which was jiot sensildy lelievetl Ity a nKuh'iate »|uantity of Li^f. opil sed. (hatth-y) injected hypodennically The dressinj;' was re- moved and tlie j,dass draina^'e tiihe found tilh'd with licpiid fa'cal matter. From this time lie sank rapie peritoneal cavity. The hutton remained in situ, but the approximated ends of the bowel were coniplottdy j^anj^renous in their whole circumference and had given way just beyond the border of the button. I cannot otier nny .satisfactory explanation of this unfortiuiate result. Dr. Murphy states, in a letter to me, that " this is an ex- ceptional case and has not «iccun'ed s(» far, except wdiere there was infection from without, preventiii;^' the unio:i, and wdiere the j)ost-mortem show^'d that there was no effort at union at any poi'tion of the circutnfeivnce, as well as at the point where the perforation occurred. This condition was certaiidy sh(»wn by the post-mortem in this case, l)ut 1 cannot l)elieve that it was piimarily due to infection from without. I caniu)t believe that with such .symptoms as I have narrated in the liistory of the first forty-eight hours after operation there could have been infection from with- out. I am much more inclined to attribute it to one of two things, either (1 ) impairment of the vitality of the ends of the bowel by the use of the elastic ligature ; or (2) pressure upon the wall of the l)owel between the end of the glass drainage tube externally and the button internally, produc- ing erosion and escape of intestinal contents, and then, infection froni without. Finally, it is perhapj open to question, whether the vitality of the bowel was not already impaired by its great distension about the stricture, and also whether, considering the thickness of the wall of the bowel in this situation, the button may not have been closed too tightly. Case II. — Mrs. M., jet 49 ; strangulated femoral hernia. 9 operation in tlu' Koyal V' ictiniii Hospital, Octolicr 2()tli, 1S!)4, jit II a.ni., tliirty-iiin«' hours after onset of symptoms. The patient, a stoutly huilt woman, had always enjoyt'd o()(((l health. Ahont fifteen years ap) a hernia first ap))enre»| in the rij^lit femoral region. It luul always lu-en ri'ilneiMe and had never ^iven hei- much trouhle. She had not worn a trus.s. Symptoms of straniiii>- well witliiii the lioidcr of tlic fittacht'd iiK'SL'nk'iy, united tin; ends with the Murphy l)utt()ii, linjiturc*! tho nicst'iiteric vessels and hrought the mesenteric horders tom-ther with catunt sutures close up to the bowel. There were thus 11 inches of bowel re- moved. The hernial sac was excised, and the peritoneal wounad symptom and made an uneventi'ul recovery. A liquid motion, (with ^latus), was expelled at the end of twenty-four hours, (after adminstration of an enema). A regular move- ment occurred again next day, and on the fifth, sixth, ninth and tenth days. The Itutton was found induMlded in a well forme(l stool, which was passeil i\}. ].:]{) p.m., Octobei' .'iOth, just ten full days after opei-ation. The wound was perfectly healed and the patient allowed up on the 22nd. Healing per primam. My experience in these three eases leads me to the con- clusion that the Murphy liuttou is a valuable aid in end to end anastomosis of intestine. So nuiny artificial aids have been introduced for this |)ui'po.se, have had theii" day and have been discarded, that most suigeons are now .sceptical about anyching of this kind. It is, of coui'se, not to be assumed that union of intestine cannot be .secui'ed without such aids, for it undoubtedly can, 1»ut the o-reat desiderata, )-ai)idity of operation and accuracy and security of co-aptation, are both admirably effected i)y this instru- ment. I cannot agree with the view which has recently been pi-onuilgated, that the Murpliy liutton is useful in the hands of the tyi'o and is not neci-ssaiy to the experienced suigeon. The actual union of the intestinal ends is but one part of the operation, even if it be the culminating point, 11 and the surge(in who is not possessed of the necessary skill to unite the ends of the intestine by snhu'e, is certainly not fitted to undertake iuiy such operatic u l»y any method. In my experience the most difficult part of such opej-ations, and the part which, most re(pn'rcs surgical skill, is that which is preliminary to the intestinal co-aptation. Ajj;ain the button may be used, (as in my second operation), deep down in the pelvis where accui-ate union by suture would be almost impossible. The great want of intestinal surgery at the present time is a suitable clamp, a damp which will occlude the lumen of the bowel, without too much pressu)-e upon its delicate walls, and without exercising pressure upon the arterial supply at the mesenteric border. Dr. Murphy's ingenious contrivance to exercise a unifoi-m spring [)re,ssure gives, 1 think, a clue which may be utilized to effect this purpose, — 1 mean to produce a clamp to be locked like an ordinary artery forceps (Pean), with smooth blades capable of being armed with rubl)er tuliing, and upon a spinal spring which will make the pressure indirect ratber than direct uniform and capable of regulation. 1 know of no clamp at i)resent in use which is not open to serious objection. The u.se of rubber tubings is, perhaps open to less objection than any (jther device, but it is not l)y any means satisfactory. As it surrounds the bowel, the wall nui.st be puckered consi- derably in order to occlude the canal— especially in the large intestine — hence more pressure is reipiired than should be necessary if applied so as to evenly appose the irnier surfaces. It also cuts oft' the circulation for a time com- pletely, and the proper regulation of the degree of pressure is extremely difficult. If one could ahvays have the ideal assistant, I believe that the best clamp is the thumb and forefinger, but a serious oljection to this is, that at best, the assistant's hands are greatly in the way of the operator, and worse still, there is the constant danger that by ixdax- ing or moving his fingers the contents of the bowel may be allowed to escape and prove disastrous to the operation.