IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-S) ///// ^SSf tj^ M 1.0 I.I b;|2| 12.5 ui Its S 1^ ilQ PSIIJU ,.6 ^ 6" ► ^/^'^ V %. ^ J> V f/^ 1 llUiU Sciences CorpoKitton 'i3 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. MS80 (716) 872-4SC3 i/j CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/iCMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions hlstoriques Tachnical and Bibliographic Notas/Notas tachniquas at bibiiograptiiquaa Tha Instituta has attamptad to obtain tha bast original copy available for ftlming. Faaturas of this copy which may ba bibliographically uniqua, which may alter any of tha images in tha reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked belcw. D D D n Coloured covers/ Couverture de coulaur I I Covers damaged/ Couverture endommag^ □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaurAe et/ou pellicula I I Cover title missing/ La titre de couverture manque Coloured maps/ Cartes giographiquas en couleur □ Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleua ou noire) j I Colcured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ Reli4 avac d'autras documents Tight binding may causa shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La re liure serrie peut causer de I'ombre ou do la distorsion la long da la marge int^riaure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text- Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certainas pages blanches ajouties lors d'une restauration apparaissant dans la texte. mais, torsqua cala Atait possible, ces pages n'ont pas M filmAes. The toti L'Institut a microfilm* la mailleur exemplaira qu'il !ui a itt possible de se procurer. Las details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-4tre uniques du point de vue bibliographiqua, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exigar una modification dans la mithoda normale de filmage sont indiqute ci-dassous. pn Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur Pagea damaged/ Pages endom magmas Pages restored and/oi Pages restaur6e« at/ou pallicul^es Pagea discolourad. stained or foxei Pages dicoloriies, tacheiAes ou piquies Pages detached/ Pages ditachies Showthrough/ Transparence Quality of prir Quality inigala de I'impression Includes supplementary matarit Comprend Ju materiel supplimentaire Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible r~~| Pagea damaged/ r~n Pages restored and/or laminated/ rT\ Pagea discolourad. stained or foxed/ I I Pages detached/ r~t\ Showthrough/ r~~| Quality of print varies/ rn Includes supplementary material/ |~n Only edition available/ D Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Lea pages totalement ou partiallemant obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure, etc.. ont M filmies i nouveau de facon i obtenir la meilleure image possible. The posi of tl film Oric beg the sion oth( first sior oril The shal TIN whi Mai diff( enti beg righ reqi met Additional comments:/ Commentairas supplAmentairas; Wrinkled pages may film slightly out of focus. This Item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est film* au taux da reduction indiqu* ci-dassous. 10X 14X 18X 22X 26X 30X 12X y 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanki to the generosity off: Bibllothdque nationale du Quebec L'exempiaire ffilm^ ffut reprodult grflce t la gAnArosIti de: Bibliothdque nationale du Qu6bec The images appearing here are the best quality possible considering jhe condition and legibility of the original copy and in iceeping with the filming contract specifications. Las images suivantes ont At4 reproduites avec le plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et de la netteti de rexemplaire film6, et en conformity avec les conditions du contrat de ffSimage. Original copies in printed paper cotters are filmed beginning with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated Impres- sion, or the bacic cover when appropriate. All other original copies are ffiimed beginning on the first page with a printed or Illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impression. Les exemplaires orlginaux dont la couverture en papier est ImprimAe sont fiimfo en commen^ant par ie premier plat et en terminant soit par la derni^re page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres e.xemplaires orlginaux sont f llmto en cc mmengant par la premiere page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'iiiustration et en terminant par la derniAre page qui compoite une telle empreinte. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol — ^> (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la dernlire imege de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbols -^ signifie "A SUiVRE", le symbols V signifie "FIN". Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method; Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre filmte A des taux de r6duction diff6rents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre reprodult en un seui clich6. il est film6 d partir de i'angle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche d droite, et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammas suivants iilustrent ia mithode. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 •>•■ \ ->' I A/:^3 //■ •"Sawr-SL?^ in the Court of Appeals, James Kerr, Esquire, {^Plaintiff below) k APPELLANT. Joseph Hubert La Croix, Esquire, Z^^aff^ C/ni- versel of his Mother Marie De La Croix, deceased, (Defendant below) RESPONDENT. T. A J. HIS Appealio instituted from a Judgment of the Court of King's Bench of Montreal, rendered in February, 1815, dismissing the Appellant's action. The action was brought against the Respondent, representing his late Mo- ther for damages, in having previoufl to and on 30th September, 1796, represented herself and the Children of her husbani! •' .hat time deceased, to be Seigneurs of a Fief called Villerai, situated under Cape Diamond, and lor iiaving sold the Appellant, for avaluable consideration, certain arrears ni Lodsel Vcntes, pretended to be due by one John Fraser, when in truth and in fact no such Fief existed, and no Lods el Ventea were due by the said John Fraser to the widow and Heirs La Croix. The idesnondent pleaded two exceptions. Isl That as Legatee Unhersel he was notanswTable,— andSdly. That the Appellant beiiiii then a Barrister, practising in the Courts of Quebec, could not legally purchase this d'bt, being then a Droit LUis'tux • But both pleas were over-ruled by the Court below, so that the only enquiry to be (hen made was, whether the allegations made by the appellant in his declaration, were true. The facts in evidence arft these. In the year 1796 the appellant was consult- ed as to the best way of recovering a sum of near £3000, due to a Mr. John E«>hs- erof London as lidlleur de fonds of tw.) wharves, situated under Cape Dia- mond The pirchasers insisted on retainin;- the money due to Mr. Eraser till the acquittance of all Lods H i'mtes anterior to their purchase, was produced. As boUi vvlnirves had been conceded in 1772 p.nd 1773 by the Widow and ILirs LaCroixincinalityofSeigneuis of Villerai, and a Judgment had been re.-dored in the Conn of Common Pleas at Quebec, recognizir.g them as Seigneurs, the ap- pellant advised Mr liurns, then a^ent of INIr. Fraser, to obiam an acquittance tinni the Widow La Croix of Ludx ec I e.tUes due by him, as the best means to facilitate the recovery of the Money. Mr Bitcns however,^ having no authority to purchase these rights, declined to d . M) till he should hear from Mr, Fraser. Tlie appellant then intending to '-isii K.n-bn.l. proposed to Mr. BuruH to make the put clw.-*e tor Mr l, . r the f xpedienev of accenling a ti-anstVr of these Lods ct Vtnte3\J:-j, „.?.'_ ."i",,„ VI,. P.-.«*.r Ti... nnni'llviiit naid £60 in money, besides live gui- /^l^ e. as soon as the widov^ La Croix'^^ ., , neiiv ,o lie Notary and . i-gag-ed to pay thildicn i,hould conHrm the assignment £60 .4.7700 %'h The Appellant was greatly disappointed on seeing Mr. Praseriti liOndoD.fortliat Gentleman insisted that the Widow and Heirs La Croix, hud nojucli Fief as Villcisil, and of course had no right to the /,oi:rves was brought to a Judicial sate, and the Appellant claimed out of the j proceeds X'600, (he amount of his Judgment against Mr. Fraser ; and the widow ' and Heirs La Criox, advanced their pretensions for the surplus Cens and Lods et ., ' /i / ^f:n(es as Seigneurs Primilijs. The Crown again contested the opposition of La I y^ /^ ;^/^/^^Vlk? Croix and the Appellant claiming under them, and for a Mirrf time the Court of I ^y / King's Bench at Que|)ec^ decreed the Widow and Heirs La Croix to be Seigneurs of Villeray and they and the appellant were ordered to be collocated on the proceeds. From this latter Judgment the Attorney General appealed to this Court which on hearing the parties, ordered that the proceedings be remitted to the Court below for further proof of properly and possession of the Fief and in the progress of that enquiry in the Court below, Paul La Croix, Brother and Attorney of the Respondent, came into Court, produced a procuration and fyled a Retraxit of the Respondent's opposition. / m- The appellant then proceeded to produce such evidence in support of his J^\, 1809. claim as was in his power, but being thus deserted by the Respondent his claim was necessarily dismissed, and Judgment was finally entered for the Crown. This Judgment given directlyon the pointsof property and possession and goingto establish the Title to this Fief to be in the Ci own and not in the Heirs La Croix, wa^ fatal to the appellant whose rights rested entirely on their title to the Fief. Jt there- fore became no Ipn^er an object to prosecute hi s suits depending in England, and they were both dismissed. Thus the Respondent (for he has identified himself with the Widow La t-'roix, his Mother) has not only had a large sum of money from the Appellant without having rendered any equivalent but from his deceitful represen- tations overwhelmed him in an expence exceeding i' 1000. It is difficult to conceive what reasons actuated the Court below in giving the Judgment now appealed from. For (he appellant has adduced proof of every thing he has alledged. 1st. That the widow and Heirs had in 1796 held themselves out to b" Seigneurs of Villerai. 2dly. That the appellant gave a sum ol money for their pretended rights and obtained a transfer of them. 3i.l\y. I'hat the Res- pondent and the Heirs declared themselves that they \yere not the Seigneurs of (hat Fief and were adjudged finally to have no siich Fief. And 4lhly. That the appellant's •^- A ^: y ■ A: \ \ 't.t 4i dnmase exteeds £1000, independent of Uie gain lie would have realized if the La .^'* •''" Cioix s Imd been i>eigneura Primilijs. »rrh«ui, As to the defence set up that this was a Droit Lilfgieux, Potbier and other authors say that to constitute the sale of a dobt, a droit lUigiettx, it mast have been liliiidtcd at the time 0/ the assignment or there must have been reason to ap- ^'''* •^'•* prehend that it would he litigated, and furtiier that the assignment should contain a fente'N.Ii'.ssS condilion that the purchaser mubt enforce pajfmeHtof the debt at his own f'osts, ^i'^^'*'f and without warranty. Now the transfer in question does not come within they,M«."' spiritor letter of ihis definition ; for the debt was not liti^tedin 1796, nor in-aso mui h as the Judgment of the Court of Common Pleas w-»s rendered three years be- fore, could it have been foreseen that ii would have bet n litigated^ moreover tiere is no co.idition that the (!el)t was to be recovtred at th« expeiire of the appellant, and w thoul guarantee of the W '.ow and H''irs, Of course tiu-y are held by the gum ami' dc. Drcif, tu indemnify ihe appellant for the damage he ban sustained by their fraud and d'ceit. The Appellant humbly submits that in seeking a reversal of the Judgment of the Court of Kin£^-'s Bench at Montreal, and a decree for such actual damage a» he hai sustaiuedj he is supported by reason, jubtice and law. j^cTr^ ^^d ^/a (.<> ^ /-. ^^'fiy^ ^(^r^ ^^^'.'.^ ^■■-^:r^-c\A -^ S-^C <;'<: 1 ..^- ^' cy^^- ^ ^ /y I y^ X ,' / >.-^- ^■'^^^ ^* y^- ^ \ y y / • y^ /^ J< I 5 y* '-* y *'^^ ' y / , ^' ' I XyitTce.^ re ,y