IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I I^i2j8 |2.5 |50 ■'^™ IIIII^H ■^ 1^ ill 2.2 !!? 1^ III 2.0 L25 ill 1.4 1.6 Photographic Sdences Corporation 33 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 072-4503 \ iV s? :\ \ ^ (moaning "CON- TINUED"), or tha aymbol V (moaning "END"), whichavar appliaa. Un daa aymbolaa aulvants apparaftra aur ia darnlAra Imaga da chaqua microficha. aalon la caa: la aymbola — »> algnlfia "A SUIVRE", la aymbola V algnlfia "FIN". IMapa. plataa. charta. ate, may ba filmad at diffarant raduction ratioa. Thoaa too larga to ba antlraly includad In ona axpoaura ara filmad baglnning in tha isppar iaft hand cornar. laft to right and top to bottom, aa many framaa aa raqulrad. Tha following diagrama illuatrata tha mathod: Laa cartaa. planchaa, tablaaux, ate, pauvant Atra filmte A daa taux da rMuctlon diff Arant*. Loraqua la documant aat trop grand pour Atra raproduit an un aaul cllchA. il aat film* A partir da I'angla aupAriaur gaucha. da gaucha k drolta, at da haut an baa, an pranant la nombra d'Imagaa nteaaaaira. Laa diagrammaa auivanta illuatrant la mAthoda. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 ,*.-..■ w''«*'-'vij ^yJ-Mif^-y^ -^ ' ■? P I I 1 'n V5 S T3 ti ii 3 c n * 'H > ^ • ta4 r r» -1 a" B, O u p* C/5 « o' 3 ?' §- »-:: SI o 3 O a s P H*i| o 3 s o c I'l-iiiliil hj J. liri>UtH, Hulmi Mieti, lldjuiiiiin;t,Loinl»». C/3 PI o / // . I .. A Sketch of proposed Regulations, concurrent with tlw *'^^->^^^ Estabhshment of a State Provision for the Roman •^ elect a .successor to the vacant Uemaii Catholic .See. "f [Note. — The mode of preparing such list is not prescribed, bnt left as a measure of intern;i! regidatiou, to be gi)vernee(|uenees: — It seems, therefore, advisable that the provision in such ease hhould he thii-< (]ualilied : vi/. * That the cause or ground of such objection should be couiniunioiited iiy the Secretary of ' Government, if rcqiiirt-d by (he i'lesidciit of election, except in those ca*n» wherein such ' communication might possibly be attended with injurious consequences to the Slate.' This head of provision must therefore necessarily involve a discuiiun «)n the jKirt of Government, which cannot be subject to specific regulation, and, at any rate, it may become a matter of ulterior consideration. Cases may be easily imagined, where the objection to the nomination of a jmrticular individual may be of a temporary nature, and not pergonal.] 4th. A clause to be introduced, conlaining the form of nn oath, to be taken by the President of election, and by him also to be adminisieied to his colleagues, to the purport that they will not give their suflrages in favour of any person but one who is known to be lirmly attached to His Majesty, and the civil constitution of the State. Also the form of an oath to be administered to the Prelate elect, in such terms as may be hereafter advised ; which oaths to be buliscribed with the signatures of the several electors, and transmitted, under the liand and seal of the J'resident of election, to the Chief SccreUny of Govern- ment, in order to be enrolled. , 5th. A clause also to declare, that no person, to whose nomination an olijcction shall bo certi- fied to the President of election by the Clii(-f Secretary of Governiuent, shall be coin|)ciciit to be elected on an actual vacancy. The objection may afterwards be removed, and in that case certified to the Roman CaUiolic Metropolitan, or Senior Prelate of the province, as no longer e.\isling.— tleciois oIlciHliug ngaiiist these provisions, to be snlypctctl to tlie penaltifs of pb*;mi;iiirk,* or — — — , and tlie election to he void to all intents and piirjinses whatever, as to the c fr> 1 1 of con- ferring any Icujal authority on the person so elcctcil, to exercise the functions of a Ilomnn Catholic Bi!iho|) ttilhin tlir rrafni. fith. As the Deans of the Homan (-atholic communion in Ireland are elected nearly in the same manner as their Binhops, and receive institution alike l>y l?ulU from Home; it is suggested, th»^ ■ similar provision should he «'n,icicd rc-ipcrtini; the el<ii(ip< in January, 17!)U- though many of the objections which liave been urged against that tneasure are imtenable, and prt -^ed with an acrimony of discussion, very little -uited to the subject and occa- sion; the |>ropo-al, nevertheless, seems to have been made uitli 1. -s eireunupection than might have been expectetl. The presentation of the candidate to Governnu-nt, oj'ter i rannnirfil election had taken place in his favour, as proposed in I7f>f>. necessarily placed such person in a painful state of degradation. If rejected. This is obviated by tlie reijniatioii now ^iig of the See of Home, whch thiy contended were "intolerable." The &anie penalty altaclui upon duiptcrs, atlmi; : ■ ontravention of tlir Kmg'ii Con^c d'Etirt. t Hesoluli'int of (he Koman Calliolic Prelates assefibled at Dublin, .)• 1799. At a meeting of the Uonian C'atholic I'relates helil in Dublin, the tTlli, I8tli, and I'Jlh oi Janu.iry, 17li9, to dclilie- rale on a proposal tioni CJoveinnicnt, ot an indi'pendent provision fur theUo:nan <- .ilholic Clergy of Ireland, under cerlain regulations, not ineonipatible with their dot iriiies, iliseip'.ine, or ju^t inlliienci — It was admitted that a provision, through (Jcivernnienl, for the Roman Catholic Clergy ef this Knig loin, competent and secured, ourIiI to be tliankliilly accepted. 'lluit, in the appomtnient of the I'relaten of the Honian Catholic Religion to vacant Sees within the Kingdom, such interference of (Jovcriiinent, a^. may iiiabic it to he satisfied of the loyalty of the person appoiiited, kjuit and ought til In agreed to. That, to give this principle its full opcralitJii, without infringing the discipline of the Rnniaii Catliolic Church, or diiiiiiiisliiiig llie religiuus iiillueiice which I'rolates of tiiat Church ought justly to possess over their respective Hock?, the following regulations seem neceisary ; — 1st. In the vacancy of a See, the Clergv of the Dioei se to reomnieml, as usual, a candidate to the Prelates of the eccle^la^tical province «l(i> cli'it him, or any other they may think more worthy, by a m.ijority of sulVrages ; in the case of equality of tull'rages, the Metropolitan or senior I'relate to have the casting vote. !id. In the election of a Metriipolitaii, if the provinci.d I'relates do not agree within two months after the va. an y, 1 Tl.^ .'xtemlo.l numlKjr of rnndiJ u« i^ tnK-ulnt«1 to ronconl from Covrrn.u.i.f tlir i.i.livi.hw.l, on nil...... il iM.i ..l.j.vt.Ml 1,., il„. .l.oi.T ot tl.c \Au'i also a |.ls,>!i'lr iipiwintnnit Inf (i(nrrn>m>it. AgaiiiM m cli a|i|K>int. jiicnts tl.r inued to he elected to lullil the diilies ol' a hiu;h and sacred oiliee, ;^ossf»ij«g 1^1 eat uiffiiouc, as ifi/'icling Irttaiiil i-ipic\ii'l;j, mi the minds <>/ a vii^t i/;i{jorili/ of tlir petplr. The possible objection to be raised i)y (jovernincnt in the case of any individual cuiididatr, it iiav been statid, may be considered as pci mam nt or temporally. As the late Dr. llussey's iiaiuc ha* been introiliiced, of hiin also may il now be said, that il' the Miiii>lm of the Ciov'. n, who were so frieiully to hij nomiiuition, or the Calholic electors, who wtie so mueli disposed tu gratify the senior Prelate shall forlimilh invite Ihr surviving Mctriipolitani t(i the cliclioii, in which each will thru liavea vote : in the n(|U.il.ty of siiirriii.'i's, the pri'siiJini; Nb Irujionlaii tu liavu a casting vote. 3(1. Ill ihi'fiiM'Uci ions tliL' iiiajuiity ot bnllragts must bf ultra mcdietatan, as the Canons rcquirf, or must consist of (lie siitfragts of more than half tlic rlcctois. 4lh. The caiuhdatc so ek-cteil to bi- presented h) the IVsidfiit of the election to GoTernmenf, which, within one month after sii(li|)ii'>iiitatiun, wiil transiiul the name of the ^.i.d tamliilate, if lio ohjetlion he made against him, for aiipoiiilment, to llie Holy See, or rtturn the saitl name to the I'losident of the elitlicm, for such traiisniis4ion, as may be ;ijjrei'd on. 5th. If Government have any proper objiclionagaini-t such canduhitr, the Prisidintof the el.clion will be inforni.'d thrreoi williin oii>; momh al.er preM-r.taliun, :i'io, m lU casr, aill convene the elector to the eicctiun ,f amuher cumiiduie. Agreeably lo the (llscipliiic of tlir lU.nian Catholic Church, these regulations can have no .nVct «ithoul the sanation of tlie Holy See, which sanction the Roman Calholx I'rrlatcs of this Kingdom shall, as soon as niav be, u,e th.ir endeivuurs to procure. The Pa-lates arc satisfied th.it the nomination of l'ari,h Priests, with a certificate of their having taken the oath of allegiance, he ctrtiUcd to Goverimient. KK IIAKI) O'liKlI.I.V, R.C.A.a Aruugh. J. S. '1H')Y, H.C.A.H. I),, bin. LIJUAHI) IJII.ION, A.H. Tuam. 'JII0M.1> IIHAV, K.C.IJ. C.i»hel. P.J. Pl.l NKKIT, IM..I!. Mcath. J. MOM.AN, U.C.H. Cork. DAMKI, DKl.A.W, U.C.U. Kildare. tU.MlND MIK.NCH. U.C.I). El,,|,i„. JAMi;s CAti.lilJ.I), H.C H tcri.ei. JOIINCKI-ISK, R.c.H.ArdaKh. ll)f« KIiit;'i Miiiistirs in tin- initnnrr of \\\» fifttioii, liud Jin-n nwirc of \i\i roiuliict in the lutlir |mit ni lilt mission to llir I'oiirt of Miidiid, in llir yraf l7SO(tii«' tir(um'nuu(| tiiat lir wonid not have brtn ikIvuikkI to tlio S((' of Wiitcrfoifl. iNiiilicr ii if ;>ntlmli|f tliat Dr. HHIcm', wliatever tcstimuniuls Iip niii^)it liav« Itornr, iiiul ju»tly lx.cn rntitlt'd to, for liin Mpprovcd loyalty, would have' hrt n «(Mt at Killida, in l7f)H. In liotli these cuMfi (iovt-rnnunt might have hud information of tiio fact«, beforu they ruuid havr rraclifd tin- ktupwii !" (lisi|uulifyiU8; ol>j«ciioii, vuUvr fir rin(iiitnt or trmjionni/, as appliralilf lo tlic ohjcctx of thin urran^c- m( lit. IndK'l, ill thn instance of Dr. liuisiy, the notoriety of his bi iiii; the coiitidiiitial chap- lain to the Sjianislj llinhussy to London, might, in it^lf, have coaiiitiileil n sufficient grmmd of objection. It IS atsumcd that the right of the imperial Parhimicnt to ittrisiute in the spirit of the>r provi- sions will not be (|uestioned. The authority of aiiiiosi every State, of whatever established com- munion, Roman (.'atholie, (jieek, Hiformed, 8ie. &l-. ih to be adduced in support of the principle. Nor lati a rotieurdut with Kome, iiniifr the circumstanctn iui^iiesftd, he de< iiied nccusjury, even on Catholi<' principles, although the concurrence of ihe Koinan I'ontilV was eoii;>i(!ered by the Cn- tholic I'rt-lales, in MW, as an indis|>ensable sanction of the me:iiiiiies then proposed. The distir.i - tion is obvious. The pmrntalioit of the citudiUute for the approhation of (ioveriwient, bif the pru- posa/ of \7\){}, Xitn to br mint quent to a canonical tlectivn, when the usual faculties vere only want- ing from (tome fur his canonical institution. — By llic mode now Migs^ested, tiie names of certain persons are to be i:an!iinitti-d to (iovcrnmcnt merely as candidates for rieetion, unknown possibly to themselves; and the objection, if taken to any, may rcmuiti equally unknovvn: — it will restmucit with the discretion of the electors. The various poiuieiitc with several of (lis Majesty's Ministers, not published. \ The power of the temporal Sovereign is here to be understood, as not interfering with the poxxer of the keys Uricllij spiritual, but in tlic sense alone that it was ever exercised in thit reuhn, in the da\ > of our Koman CathoUc ante -Ilts. The followinjr Extract, arc inl.joined as illiisJrnlivo of ll.o Principle contended fur in the preceding Sketch of I'roviMoiial Ileguliitioni. Mx^ract <^a LciUrfrom tht En. J. \V.,fe..er (a Roman Ca,Mic Clcr^ma,,) ,o Sir J. Law.on. h.n,. publM^d r. ,„ ,,,.„!lfl.,l ,n.l re.tnrtf.1 in Hinr ..p.rati.M.s a* to pro.lu.c I,y llu-ir coinhination thr l.,.|.i..r,l rcM.lb. /f o.,..r,/., r. J/M .l/wKi/j^ «'< '/< ' 'I"'/ '.f;"/<'V''. t'" ''"" '■',',""'" " '•'"•"■'<" y^. U i» comprivd inthft.glit follouin- articles: lour of ul.ul. n'l;.te to tin- apMnimm.-nt of Mriropolitai.s. ami four to the tppointinnit of Sii(lVaif.in P.ishops. With rrnp.^i to llip f,.rmn-, it propoHfn. in llif lir.t pla.r, that, on th.- demise of a MctroiH.liian, Ins surceHsor l.c elected hy the M.rvivin- Siillhuinn. :-Sceoi..lly. iltni /Af name , Ills ;1/«;V,.(/f Pmy Oimril .— Thirdly, that whcnevrr the prrson whoM: iianir Miall he delivrrc.l in to III. MijcHly's IVuy Co.iiic.l. ,,hall be ohjectr.l U, by the saine, anolher -hall !..■ el.Tl.-d ;-.\nd loinilily, tli.it «hen the persoi. clect-d iW/ iwl be ohjecteti to by Hit Majeai/s Privy Council, application shall he made to the I'ope in ln» Ik half for e.inonical in*tiiution. With respect to the latter, it al>n propones, first, thai, on the (leiin.e of a Siiirra;{.in Ui>hop, Ins sueee.tsor be elected by the Clergy of the vncaiil iliocoe :— Sreondly, thai the name ol the person so elected hy a majority of sullra^'e• »h:ill be delivered to the Ili.-hops of the province as»enihled in council, at which the Metropolitan bhall pre.i.le : —Thirdly, that when the persen wlio-e name slijll he .Itliviied in ti> the Ihshop^ so as-eiiibled, shall be rejected by a niiijiTity of uflVa-e,, another •'hall he ileeted : — AikI tonrlhiy, tli.il, when the person elected shall be ai>provtd of hy the Iti-hop.i so assembled, hy a majoniy of suffrages he shall receifc from the Metropolitan canonical in-litutum. " The sole danger to whieh tlie f iir< of our political friends ap]iear at present to he coiifimd, or wliich even the hi[;oti-y of our pulitieal adversaries can with any Dlausihilitv all. gi- »» '!"• tf"iind of il" "■ hottility to Catholic em"ancip:ilion. is the interference 'of the Pope in the nppcintm.nt of Ci-Miohe II..!...,.. .\o\v every possible danirer whieh may he Mippoied to aris« from »neh inii'rfereiitfe, the adopiinn of the ■'. oemc which I have presumed to sui,';{eM, will ellLctnally remove. Tor in the appointment of Milropolilaiis (which is the only case in wliich the scheme admits of the interposition of the Pope), :'/ also ;irts to Ilis Mtijfsii/'t Privy C.mncil an cff^tuul rfgittive, hy the exercise oJ'kIiu-Ii ei\-ry (■'•noxiniH i>ti)cn may «/:;■ yt beeirludcd.*" EHracls from a " Ldlcr to a I'uriali Priefl," iVc ly Ih. Milncr, Timlwp of Vn telhalu, V. A. in the Midland llistnct, d.iltd ]>t .-/■y»s/, ISIIH. " I proceed to show upon what 'jmuiuls Iie-ttd my tipniion, thai the Ir.sh Prelates, in the event of a " friendly Ministry sneei rdiiij,' to pi'Uer, and of the diiaii! ipatioii beini; uraiiled, wnuld not hesitate, under " the pre»umed saneliuii of 11 is llolmcss, toadiint til' a liiuiti d pnwerof exeUMnn m the executive (iuverninent. " The first of these ^k.iiikI.s is the iiclnul i.i,i,\riit winch they (ilial is) the li.or Metriipohlans and six of the "most ancient Jlislieps, speakin^f in the name of tin uIkjIc l-;pise(.j,al Uody, have actually tjiven to the " ])ropo»ed measure in their sulemn d. hlieraiiun^, |j( Id al Dublin mi the ITlli, iMili, anil lUtli January, 1799. " In these dehbeialioiis, liaviii-.; prcinisid the Juxiicc and propriety of the inter.'ereiice of (.orernment in the " appointment of (Jdlliolie liisliops, as l.ir as it is necessary to ascerlam their loyalty, lliry resohe as follows:" —[The Hesolutionsof 1;'J9 are then tiuoten, and are considered, " by both, ai. binding' upon the llpiscpal I'.ody ;— '2dly, That the exehisivr power ilsell', or the rinlil of the "Veto, is not less ex; lieitly oller.d in them than it is menliuiifd m my iiei;oii;ition-:— idly. The necessary " checks ii|)on this Veto are not so dislmelly expressed i:i the toriner as lluv aii' m ihc huicr." A"aiii • It is scarcely llec»f,^.l. \ lo ...l.„ rve, (hat, llioiigh \\\c principle ol lie- Ki:i-N-prrn.,,:itive U adiiiilted hy Mr. Wheeler in the preceding piojiosal, it ilo.s not :,d- ipuilel^ provide agaid.t the ;.|.p .i,.U,,ciU ol a SiiJ, ,.i;un ISisUf, agaiust whom an objection mij^lit be urged, miIu f(|ual jihlK.r, hy IJin Majcil_\'s (igvi rniiniit. " In almoU fffry nnratholic country mp«n* tre prnfuUil, and ran i« taken, both Uy tho«« who h.i»^ • " rittlit lo |irp«'Ml, anil liy the Ilnly Srr lirrtrlf, lh:it no prr«»e hi* roadjiitor, until the Initcr Inn hftn itpprofd l'ivernili<'iit " of all rt( liuivc |K>wiT III I ri'«(»niin^ lo ('ntholic Prt'liHiw, if cnnfmrd to ihrt-r hin^f cwumicul electiont." lli.hop MiliHT then proceed* thu» — " Slwuld the Pn latfj rtcedefiom ihr It :,ilution», which tlifii entered iniit •* at Dublin, in 1799, I ho]* tlu-y will lie ahle to viiuiicale their priH«ed:in;it and clmrarlrr, iinainst the " iiuinrrouH and uhli' opponents of eacli commiiiiioii, who will not tad to attack them nn the lubject, nnJ " haiasH thtin for many ytai-« lo come. 1 Iioik: lln.'y uiU provide aiitwrrn, and »iich aiMWcrt ax may he " dcfi-ndt'd a);ain>l inrii oftalfiit!), to llu- followiiii; ipuMioni, uliirli will iiR-c-Aaiilly ho put tu them, iih they " have ill purl lieeii alreaiiy frequently put to mr. < 'I'lie head uf the Church hat allowi'd a direct iiiterl'erence " HiiJ p4>wcr in the appuiiiliiienl of Hmliopa throufihout the Kceatir part of the Chrixliuii l.'onliiunt, to a mm " who has apostatized to MahomcUni^im ; and shall it l><- ilefintil uninnj'uljnr "m Mamirch to interfere in thit " hti»ineiif JuU so Jar a* it is necet.uiry to usceitain the loyally of men, who are to pouess sitvh /fr eat iiifiuenee n-.i-f " his iu'jeett t The nchisnintical Sov«-rci;fii of Hus.iin, and the litTctical King of I'rusiia, have always l>een " cunsiiltcd III the choice irtd to ; and that, therefore, the candidate elected is to he presented to Gov»'rnniciit ; and " that if (•'ovcrnment nine " years u^o, and which have uniaincd with it ever since, to he acted iip< „ wlieiuver circiinisianccs tliould " permit. nplirre, and v.'hat is comparatively " cay to be done; namely, to enlighten their people, and ihoxo them ho;c j^rotyly ihey hive been imposml upon, " both as lo facts and reasoning,"* * Such wan Bishop Milner'* statement and atl»ire to the Prelates of hii comiiiiiiiion, in 1*09. In ISIO, the same learned Prelate published Ins " Instructions to llie Ctilholics of the Midland Cuuiities in England, on the Stale and Dangers of their iW/gion,"— which lie iceins then but to have just diicuvered ; and one of the Kroatcbk of wliith dangen hii coiiiidrri to be tliat secariti/, whii li h (irrnandeil of Honian Calliolics, for the " rell|'ioiin KsUlilisliiiieiit of Ilic State." —Referring to the o|iiiiiuii-. he had expressed in the preceding Kxtracts, in conjiiiii-tion willi all tlir M'-lropolilans and the six senior Dishops of lii> coiiiiiiiiiiion in Ireland, in 1799, he pro« eeds lo a rrlrnclalion, in these words :— " i hereby " publicly retract and comlcnin my aforesaid • Irtlcr to a J'urish Priest,' and all nij other Letter* and Writini;*, « whctlicrvriiited or manuTript, on the jubjrct of the feto, wluch I wrote v»liile I was under the aforetajd-delmlon; "Ihalis tos.w, from the Liltci part of .1%, till about the conclusion of A'opemifr, 1808."— In the same note, Bisliop Miliier observes, itut, " afirr all, tlut imurliinate private, though printed Letter [to a Parish Priest], was a mere piiir '• v{ mnotrig, intended fertile omsidiT.ition of the Irish Bishops, at their approaching assembly [hi September I80H], " and withlield as far as lav in my power, from l!ic inspection of others."— Wc are not disposed to controvert tin Bisliop's privilege of ilispens np with the oblii^ations apparently resulting from his own opinions, however solemnly cr formally st.ited ; but we cmnot so readily admit his power of changing the essence of facts. If the regulations ami restrictions upon the appointment of the Roman t'atholic Bishops, aa admitted by Bishop Milner, exist in the several States which he has eniMncraleil— whether of the lioman Cathnlic, Greek, or Refurmed C'luneheH— they must still exiii, independently of the learned Prelate's iW.m^s of opinion. So, if all the Metropolitans, and the six senior B.C. Prelates of Ireland, in the vear 1799, resolve that " such interference, as may enable it to be satislied of the loyalty "ofthepers»n appointed [u Bishop], is jusl and ou.nht to be agreed to;"' — w« cannot admit sutJi interference to he less just and expedient at the present hmr, altlioiii^li Bishop .Milner has thought proper to retract his ov*-n opinion in favour of it, on his discovery thai tceuriti/ was demanded of the Catholic, in favour of the Establishment in the Chiircli as well ,is ihe Slate:— ti svcunlv virtually recognised in the oatlis taken by Catholics in all parts of the United Kingdom. S,) likewise may we consider, that, whether the Homaii Catholic Prelates arc difpos'.d to accept, or reject, the " Sliite " Provision for tUcirVtergii," wrhich all the Mttropolitans and si:; senior U. C. Bishops declared, in l"91>, " ouij,ltl t > bf " tImnkfuUy uccepttd ;" it does not follow but that the State oughi .o be equally satislied of the loyalty and civil eligibdity of the person apponited to a char;j«', holding so great an inllnence, in opinion and habit, upon the minds of those within the sphere of its juri^^diclion. llavim; ailvirted to the opinions held on these points in 1790, we are naturally disposed to putthe question suggested by I'istiop Milner himself: " Is that become false and unlawful now, which was true an.l " lawful then ?" And to conclude, in the words of a Right Honourable Baronet,* — a zealous supporter of the claims o( tjie Catholics,—" the rule of right, the measure of justice, miibt be the same to-day — yesterday— and for ever." • Sir J. Ntwport'i Letter in tlie Dublin Herald, dated I8th Not. I8I'2. Tlie preceding Kxtract* are taken from the Supplementary Notes annexed to the Sub.stance of Sir J. C. Hippisley's Speech on iMr.Grattan's Motiou, a4th April, 1812.— (Uidgway, PiccaUiily.) •reiaiddelHiion; me note, bisliop AM a mere picif 'ptcniber I80n], ) controvert the :vrr solemnly or regulations and t In the sevrrai muit still rxift, ix senior U. C, 1 of tlic loyalty crfereiice lo lie ipinion in favour yiitnli as well ,is I Kjngiloni. ,Si> ret, tlie " Stiitc 9, " ouu,IU t> b: 1 civil ellgilj:lily uf those within tiirally dis|)(.so(l cli was true aiiil f the claims of )r ever." m :e of Sir J. C. illy.) '.^^^**efefcJ'"7rijyT»v-^' ,