THE QUESTION 
 
 OF A 
 
 DOMINION PROHIBITORY LAW, 
 
 CONSIDERED IN ITS 
 
 Financial, Moral and Religious Aspects, 
 
 BY 
 
 WAKEFIELD HARDGRAVE, A. P. 
 
 PRICE 15 CENTS. 
 
 ■ <•> ■ 
 
 ' TORONTO : 
 THE AUTHORS' PUBLISHING Co. 
 1897. 
 
j^:r:-^ '-::/.i^.''*m'^''!Ki:.i^Ji-ii^'-:' ■'- 
 
 {^'^r^iz 'i'y-rli; iV'^^^jg'rjf? 
 
y THE QUESTION 
 
 OF A 
 
 DOMINION PROHIBITORY LAW, 
 
 CONSIDERED IN ITS 
 
 Financial, Moral and Religious Aspects, 
 
 BY 
 
 WAKEFIELD HARDGRAVE, A. P. 
 
 PRICE 15 CENTS. 
 
 TORONTO : 
 
 THE AUTHORS' PUBLISHING Co. 
 
 1897. 
 
Entered according to Act of the Parliament of Canada, 
 in the year iSgy, by The Authors Publishing Co., in 
 the Office of the Minister of Agriculture. 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 As tho writor of the following pagas T <lootn it lulvisahlo to 
 hUiU\ by way of prof.iot^ tiiat, in giving tlioni to tho public, my 
 principal aim is to assist my readers in forming a true estimate of 
 the adverse manner, in which a Dominion Prohibitory Law would 
 alFect tho interests of our country generally. I may also state, 
 that r have no connection whatever with the manufacture or sale 
 of li(juor, anil that no person engaged in the licjuor tralKc, nor any 
 other person, has ever asked ujo to write one word in its behalf. I am 
 I)ersonally a firm believer in voluntary temperance — the temperance 
 of the Bible — but, at the same time, maintain, to the fullest extent 
 the principle of individual responsibility ; and decline to force my 
 neighbour, by Act of Parliament or otherwise, to eat or drink just as 
 I do. T have made a careful study of Prohibition, have been connec- 
 ted with its judicial enforcement in its Scott Act shape, and, after 
 much experience of its operations, have come to the conclusion that 
 sumptuary laws of this character do more harm than good ; and 
 confer no benefits on society to compensate it for the fierce social 
 hatreds, the contempt of the law, and the dangerous criminal 
 classes they create. Sooner or later the {)eriod of reaction 
 against them will 'iertainly make its apj)earance, and then the 
 dial-hand of true temperance is sure t<> recede instead of advanc- 
 ing.* Much calm consideration of the question has led me to 
 believe, that the moral suasion and religious teacliing which brought 
 Pagan Home into the fold of Christianity, in Apostolic times, can 
 alone form the true basis of ethicial reform in the present day. — 
 There is so much bigotry, so much intolerance, &o much self-righte- 
 ousness, so much falsehood and special pleading connected with the 
 existing advocacy of Prohibition, that an independent, honest and 
 Ciilm review of the whole (juestion, in its Financial, Moral and 
 Religious aspects, can hardly fail to do good. To this task I have 
 applieii myself, and in endeavouring to accomplish it seek only the 
 welfare of my country. 
 
 WAKKFIELD HARDGRAVE. 
 
 * Tliis view of the case has recently had ample confirmation in Maine. The 
 Prohibitionists of that State met in convention, at Waterville, on April 
 .SOth, 1896, antl one plank of their platform was as follows : 
 
 " We declare that the State of Maine presents a condition of lawlessness 
 that disgraces its civilisation, that nullification of the litjuoi law is wide- 
 spread and open, that whole communities are com[)el ed to ctinsent to a 
 shameless illegal traffic, that County Officials work the law for purposes of 
 revenue, and that long continued familiarity with illegal rumselling has 
 I egotten, in a consideraMe number of citizens, a disrespect of the authority 
 of the lav/ in general. We hold the Republican and Democratic political 
 jtarties responsible for this deplorable condition ; the olficials of these parties 
 nullify the law, and the "oters of these parties condone nullification at the 
 ballot box." — Appleton's CVloptL'd;a for 1896. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 General Review of Prohibition ftiwl tho Scot Act, page 3. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 The Financial A«p<)ot9 of Prohibition, l.'t ; How ia Prohibition to bo on* 
 forced, IQ. 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 Hiatoryof the Temperance Movement, 25 ; DiscuHsion as to Chemical pro- 
 perties of Hibhi WiiieH, 20 ; The Irish Presbyterian (yhnrch reject! nnfer- 
 mented Sacramental Wines. 27 ; Tlio Modern Wines of Palestine, 28 ; The 
 Wines of the Old Testament. .SO ; Prohibition and the New Testament, 33. 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 Some of the Protestant Chnnihes an I Prohibition, 3!); The Theism of 
 Ololdwin Smith, 42 ; Professor Workman's allejforioal and huterodoxioal 
 method of Bible exegesis. Modern Wine heresie-i, 47 ; Clerical polities in 
 Ontario, 48 ; Sir Oliver Mowat, Sir Wilfred Lauricr, and Mr. Hardy, 49. 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 Prohibition ail the world over— in England and the Continent of Europe— 
 in the United State.", oH ; The Maine Law, 57 ; Prohibition «loe<i not pnmiote 
 public prosperity, 51) ; Deatlis fnmi Alcoholism, 60 ; The Scott Act in the 
 Maritime Provinces. (W ; Conchision, 61 ; Crime in the United States, 03 ; 
 Prohibition and Politics in the United States, 04 ; Appendix, articles from 
 the Toronto Olobe and Montreal, Qazette, 65. 
 
 -4*»- 
 
 ERRATA 
 
 Page 8 in note marked * fi»r ti'^ure 3 read 5. 
 
 " 16, line 21 for pan read pay**. 
 
 •• 16, line 22, for have read han. 
 
 " 25, line 20, for it^ read their. 
 
 " 33, line 11, for but read yet. 
 
 " 53, lii»e 17, for clniwes reatl jieopte. 
 
 " 55, line 37, for But the insect plagne has, read The insect p'agne 
 has, however,. 
 
 Page 49. The statement made on this page that clergymen are not tax- 
 payers may reijuire a brief explanation In Ontario clergymen's salaries up 
 to $1,000 were formerly exempt from taxation by a special statutory clause. 
 The Assessment Act of 1892 has not however, got this clause, and the sum 
 of $700 is now the limit of salary exemption. That sum represents the 
 average clergyman's salary, but even where it exceeds that amount assessors, 
 as a rule, make no return therefor. 
 
f. ,r • p.- ■■ - ^ t. , ■.-, 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 * 
 
 GENERAL REVIEW OF PROHIBITION AND THE SCOTT ACT. 
 
 THE Dominion of Canada was thirty years of age on the first 
 day of July, 1897. During the three decades of its existence 
 it has passed through various vicissitudes of one kind or another, 
 not the least among which were the en ictment by the Federal 
 Parliament of the Canada Temperance, or Scott, Act in 1878, and 
 its adoption, by the electoral vote, in nearly the whole of the Pro- 
 vince of Ontario in 1884. Foremost among its advocates stood the 
 Methodist Church, then rendered unusually strong and influential 
 by the union of its various principal wings. Despite much opposi- 
 tion the movement was most successful. A large number of 
 electors who were not favourable to Prohibition on general princi- 
 ples, but were, nevertheless, opposed to the evils of the liquor 
 traffic in the abstract, held aloof from the agitation altogether, 
 declined to appear at the polls on election day, and, in this way, 
 permitted the act to go into active operation in their several dis- 
 tricts. They were willing to give it a full trial for three years, in 
 that fair judicial spirit so eminently characteristic of the Canadian 
 people as a whole, and if they did not like its operations at the end 
 of its first term, stood prepared to vote it out of active existence.* 
 In 1887 the people of Ontario began to grow heartily weary of 
 the Scott Act for a variety of reasons, and in the ensuing year a 
 strong agitation commenced for its repeal. They had weighed it 
 fairly in the balance for three years, and in some cases for a longer 
 period, and found it sadly deficient in many respects. They also 
 found that it had added neither to their happiness, nor their com- 
 ort, nor even to public morality ;t were much dissatisfied with the 
 
 * McMuUen's History of Canada, vol. 2, p. 436. 
 
 t In the Province of Ontario the average of convictions for all offences 
 and crimes, for the four years preceding the Scott Act period, namely, from 
 1881 to 1884, stood per 1,000 of the population, at 8.76 per annum. During 
 the four years the Scott Act waa in force, that is from 1885 to 1889, the 
 
<7V 
 
 e (lENEHAL TIEVTEW 
 
 inquiHitorial tyranny of ifcH oporations, and tlm most unsatinfactory 
 inannor of its «nforcPment ; and voto<l, as a rulw, by lftrg« maJoritioH 
 for its repeal. 
 
 Tn the UniUsd States the retail liiiuor vendor is an important 
 factor in the puliticul arena, and in numberless instances, and in 
 every part of the Union, has largely influenced legislation in his 
 own favour. In Canada, and especially in Ontario, matters in this 
 direction are altogether different, and liquor dealers exercise very 
 little influence with the general electorate. When the repeal of the 
 Scott Act was voted on, they accordingly deemed it to be their 
 best policy to remain out of sight as much as possible, and leave 
 the result entirely with the rest of the electorate. As a rule they 
 attended no public meetings of any kind, had no special advocates 
 to champion their cause, and did little or nothing otherwise to 
 influence public opinion in their own behalf ; and made no general 
 canvass of votes. A similar policy was pursued by the great mass 
 of the opponents of the act. They had made up their minds to 
 vote against it, owing to their bitter experience of its operations, 
 and declined to waste their time on what they considered as useless 
 discussion. It might well be called, so far as they were concerned, 
 a silent vote given without passion or prejudice — a vote based solely 
 on reason and honest conviction, and emphatic only in the 
 light of the large majorities it had almost everywhere in its favour. 
 It was the deep current of public opinion, educated by the force 
 of circumstances, among a free people, and swept aside everything 
 out of its course. " It was the verdict of people who were not 
 drunkards," said the Montreal Daily Gazette, " and just as it were 
 people who were not total abstainers who first put the act into 
 force." 
 
 On the other hand the supporters of the Scott Act, all over 
 Ontario, were exceedingly active, and held meetings in every direc- 
 tion, which were addressed by their ablest speakers both clerical 
 and lay ; while much of the public press, and Prohibition fly sheets 
 as well, were used without stint in their behalf. At the same time 
 they had the most perfect electioneering organization it is possible 
 to conceive. Every Methodist church in the Province might be 
 described as a committee room, and the bulk of its congregation 
 as the most active of canvassers. In many cases, also, Presbyter- 
 ian congregations were almost equally active. In addition, the 
 Prohibitionist Party had the great advantage of being strongly 
 supported by the Scott Act enforcement committees, who had con- 
 trolled, hitherto, the expenditure of large sums of money on the 
 host of spies and informers, which they had called into existence to 
 carry out their behests, and did not now hesitate to use the corrupt 
 
 convictions rose to the yearly average of 10.14. During the four years imme- 
 diately following the mneal of the Scott Act, the annual per centage of con- 
 victions, to every 1,000 of the population, decreased to 8.85. — Vide BJue 
 Book. 
 
I 
 
 OF PROHiniTTON. 7 
 
 powor they had in this way accjuirod.* And, yK, d«*Hpitfl nil these 
 fnvdurnble uircuniHtanueH, they wore utterly beaten by unorganised 
 und undirected public opinion, by the people of their own honest 
 and independent free will, and met their Waterloo with a ven- 
 geance in the great prenuer province of the Dominion. In IHHH 
 the Scott Act repeal vote was taken in eight counties of Ontario, 
 and was successful in every case ; in Home districta by majorities of 
 nearly two to one. In IHH9 the net was rejected by a vast aggre- 
 gate majority in seventeen counties, and in Uuelph and 8t. 
 Thomas. Not a single municipality in the leading province of 
 Canada, as regards population, education and prosperity, remained 
 eventually under its unbearable and un-Hritish yoke, and its people 
 once more breathed OcmI's blessed air as free men. There was 
 indeed a marvellous change ! A great and peaceful calm at once 
 succeeded to the fierce social storm which had raged so violently, 
 during the four preceding years, from one end of Ontario to the 
 other. The huge array of spies and informers whicli the Scott Act 
 had called into existence, and who had fattened upon the public so 
 long, disappeared as if by magic ; and with them also passed away 
 the perjury, the contempt of the law, the fierce personal hatreds, 
 and the man}' social disorders otherwise that had recently afflicted 
 the country. At the Hamilton Spring Assizes of 1888, Mr. 
 Justice Rose, when addressing the grand jury, alluded to the Scott 
 Act, and said he was glad it had been repealed in a number of 
 counties, because it had done so much to lower the tone of the law.f 
 
 * The Canada Temperance Act does not provide for the coat of its enforce- 
 ment by the Federal Govt^rnment, and leaves that duty to the provinces and 
 municipalities immediately concerned. In Ontario different statutes made 
 provisions for the enforcement of the act, which were finally consolidated in 
 the Liquor License Act of 1887- This act provided that where the licenses 
 paid by druggists were not sufficient to meet the expenses incurred in 
 enforcing theScott Act, one-third of the deficiimcy shou'd be borne by the 
 Province and two-thirds by the county or minor municipality. License 
 Commissioners and Inspectors were directed to enforce the act. The Prohi- 
 bitionists becoming dissatisfied, in many cases, with the manner in which the 
 act was enforced by the authorities, formed local committees to prosecute 
 offenders. A large part of tlie enforcement fund was distributed among these 
 committees, to be paid out to infoimers and secret spies, and to be otherwise 
 used to secure convictions. Serious complaints were made at the time that 
 no proper returns were ever given to the public as to how their money was 
 expended. As fines belonged to this enforcement fund, it was eventually 
 sought to increase them by prosecuting all crimes against the Scott Act as 
 first offences. The fine in this case being only ^50, was readily paid by 
 frequent offenders. Unless in some extreme cases, tb j punishments for second 
 and third offences were rarely put in force. A great source of corruption and 
 law-breaking was thus opened up. 
 
 t Toronto Olobe, April 24th, 1888. 
 
 The Royal Commission showed very plainly that the operation of the 
 Scott Act in the Maritime Provinces was not ut all conducive to the morals 
 of the people, and that the law was systematically disregarded. It was 
 carried in most counties by a minority vote of the whole electorate, and the 
 
 
8 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 On a subsequent occasion the same judge declared that while on a 
 circuit from Prescott to Sandwich, during Scott Act times, his 
 experience was that about half the criminal business before the 
 courts arose out of attempts to enforce tliat law.* Numbers of 
 clergymen had not only exerted themselves in advocating the Scott 
 Act, but also in enforcing it, and now shared the odium of its 
 oveivviielming defeat. They had abandoned moral suasion and 
 religious teaching, the only true foundations of public reformation, 
 and betook themselves to the platform of legal coercion, to pay the 
 penalty of their fatal mistake in being utterly I'outed at the polls, 
 and so weakening their influence with their flocks.f 
 
 Without designing to reflect in any way on our French-Canadian 
 brethren, we may here state that the English-speaking people of 
 Canada are, mentally and morally, a wonderfully well-balanced 
 community. The ^-^imate, in the first place, tones down in no 
 small degree the angles of Old World national character, be they 
 English, or Irish, or Scotch, and has a strong tendency to blend 
 that part of our population into one harmonious whole ; while 
 travel and a wider experience of human nature, in the second 
 place, make it more thoughtful, more intelligent and more cosmo- 
 politan. English-speaking Canadians, are, at the same time, in 
 the aggregate, a most orderly, unassuming and law-abiding people ; 
 apt to think a good deal for themselves, and naturally fond of 
 much personal liberty, but not of license. It will, therefore, be read- 
 ily understood why the repeal of the Scott Act was taken so sober- 
 ly, and conduced to no excesses. It led to no increase of drinking, 
 to no increase of crime, but on the contrary caused the decrease of 
 both, j Breweries which could not manufacture beer fast enough 
 to fill their orders during the Scott Act period, and were thus com- 
 
 * Toronto Mail, January 13th, 1894. 
 
 + McMulIen's History of Canada, vol. 2, p. 493. 
 
 The Ottawa correspondent of the Toronto Globe of September 14, 1896, 
 makes some statements which support this contention. He says that at St. 
 Andrew's (Presbyterian) Church the Rev. W. T. Herridge alluded very 
 forcibly to the decline of clerical influence. The time had gone by, he said, 
 when clerical utterances were received as oracles from heaven. 
 
 t For the facts see note to page 3. 
 
 majority of the voters not being behind it, its enforcement soon became a 
 matter of difficulty. The commissioners found that liquor was sold very 
 generally in all the hotels, and even at some of the railway stations. For 
 example, the Scott Act was carried in the County of Cape Breton on August 
 11th, 1885, by a vote of 739 to 216, out of a constituency which numbered 
 3,702 names on the voters' list, leaving nearly three-quarters of the total 
 body of electors unpolled, and who now, as the Act does not suit them, 
 decline to enforce it. The same state of things precisely prevails in various 
 other parts of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, and where, while nominally 
 under the Scott Act, the open sale of liquor is tacitly permitted. How 
 infinitely superior would a good license law be to this immoral state of 
 thing*. 
 
■,:'H'Y ...v.- -^^ .. , -:-f ) ,.i ,i ♦' :■ '.'.>^-i.'^. 
 
 OF PROHIBITION. 9 
 
 pelled to send out for consumption a fresh and comparatively 
 unwholesome article, had now ample time to permit their product 
 to ripen and become tit for use ; and while the operations of a well- 
 administered and effective license law, such as the Province of 
 Ontario possesses, almost wholly extinguished illicit liquor selling, 
 the tavern keepers' receipts^ under the new order of things, fell, in 
 the great majority of cases, to fully one-half what they were while 
 the Scott Act was in force, a fact which can be substantiated by 
 any amount of sworn testimony if necessary. But this is not all 
 that can be said to show the benefits resulting from the repeal of 
 the Scott Act. During the period of its enforcement it was well 
 known that very few private dwellings of any great pretence were 
 without a consjjant supply of liquor for domestic consumption, 
 mainly because it was the forbidden fruit for the time being, and 
 because human nature is prone to rebel against sumptuary legisla- 
 tion which interferes with personal responsibility, and full freedom 
 of action, as to what we shall eat and what we shall drink, and 
 which is wrong in theory and impossible of success. Among the 
 first fruits of the adoption of the Scott Act, arose a state of things 
 of tho most painful and demoralising character. Before it came 
 into active operation there was a general rush, especially in towns, 
 to lay in supplies of liquor of every description ; and a good many 
 avowed supporters of the act were not a whit behind its opponents 
 in this respect, a circumstance which created not a little amuse- 
 ment and a good deal of comment at the time. So great was the 
 demand for liquor that the stocks of all the local dealers were 
 speedily exhausted, and fresh purchases had to be made in order to 
 supply their customers. People who never before had liquor in 
 their houses now freely purchased the article, and soon became 
 accustomed to the use of strong drink. Domestic tippling, the 
 most dangerous of all modes of using liquor, was inaugurated on a 
 large scale. Many men who had become accustomed to the moder- 
 ate use of stimulants, but who had hitlierto carefully concealed the 
 fact from their families, now for the first time introduced liquor 
 openly into their homes, and once they had it there could not 
 churlishly deny a share to other members of their household. In 
 all the border towns lying close to the Ameiican frontier, smug- 
 gling at once received an enormous impulse when the Scott Act 
 came into full force, and a good deal of dry goods and grocery 
 business soon followed in the wake of the illicit liquor traffic. But 
 while trade drooped along the Canadian border, it flourished like a 
 bay tree in conterminous Yankeedom, Where rivers constitute the 
 international boundary line, and bibulous Canadians crossed over 
 to the land of free whiskey, to have a good time, several persons 
 were drowned when returning home in a state of intoxication. 
 Adopt Prohibition all over Canada, and this unhappy state of 
 things will be reproduced, but, as a matter of course, in a greatly 
 increased degree. When the Scott Act' came to an end, smuggling 
 bad liqnor from Yankeedom came also to an end. Supplies of the 
 
•7j-:y.rv,n^- .,;,.»^.f, , „• , V ■ .•"■■.. .-;^ 7, , ;,, jv^ 
 
 10 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 article for domsstic use were no longer laid in, as it could now be 
 purchased at tlie stores when needed, and thus matters returned to 
 their normal condition, and all temptation to secret tippling, the 
 curse of the household, was removed. And now that liquor was no 
 longer the prohibited article, numbers abandoned its use altogether, 
 and forgot all about it.* 
 
 Despite all assertions to the contrary, it is an undoubted fact 
 that the English speaking populations all over the world are a 
 much more sober people to-day than at any former period. It is 
 the bitter experience of all the great cities of the mother land that 
 poverty is now, as indeed it has always been, the strongest incen- 
 tive to intemperance, and that this vice decreases as the lower 
 order of society rises to a condition of comparative comfort and 
 prosperity. Every careful reader of English literature must be 
 aware of the great change for the better, as regards the drinking 
 habit, which has taken place among the higher classes of Great 
 Britain. The tierce drinking carousals, which constantly occurred 
 at dinner parties during the past century and the first half of the 
 present one, have wiiolly disappeared ; the drunken gentleman, so 
 common in those days, is now rarely met with, and is ostracised by 
 decent people of every rank in society. Our ancestors of a century 
 and a half ago drank three times as much beer, and eight times as 
 much spirits, as are consumed by each individual in the mother 
 country to-day. In 1750, William Maitland, F. R. S., of England, 
 and a celebrated statistician of that day, published a History of 
 London, which contains a vast amount of curious information with 
 regard to the drinking habits of its people in his time. The 
 number of public houses in the metropolis was ascertained by exact 
 survey, and the figures of consumption were derived from the cus- 
 tom house and excise returns. The population of London was then 
 726,303, living in 95,968 houses, or an average of nearly eight 
 persons to every house. Tlie quantity of liquor annually consumed 
 by this population was enormous. It embraced 70,955,604 gallons 
 of beer, 11,205,627 gallons of ardent spirits, and 30,040 tuns of 
 wine, which, at 80 gallons to the tun, would be equal to 2,403,200 
 gallons. The year's consumption per head would therefore be beer 
 97 gallons, spirits 14 gallons, and wine say 3^ gallons. The yearly 
 consumption per head in Great Britain, during the three decades 
 ending with 1894, has been beer 28.4 gallons, spirits and wine 
 together 1.48 gallons. The consumption in the United States of 
 these beverages is somewhat less per capita,! and Canada shows a 
 
 * While the Scott Act was in force in a large centre of population, the 
 manager of a new water company assured the writer that liquor was fouud iu 
 almost every cellar into which his men went to put in pipes. 
 
 t Although the population of the United States has more than douhled 
 between i8J.) and 1893, the consumption of liquor iu that country was less 
 in the latter than in the former year. In 1860 it was 90,000,000 of gallons, 
 in 1892 79,000,000 gallons. At the same time the production of malt liquor, 
 especially the almost non-intoxicating lager beer, rose from 8,380,000 barrels 
 

 OF PROHIBITION. 11 
 
 still greater improvement in this respect. According to Mr. Mait- 
 land, the addiction of the people of London to the use of spirits, 
 during his time, was so general and so great as to affect the value 
 of food ; the consumption of which so diminished in volume as to 
 cause a fall in price, to the no small loss of the landed interest. 
 Attempts were made to check the evil by legislation, but at first 
 they were too severe, then too mild, and both did more harm than 
 good. Gradually, however, the spirit traffic was reduced in extent, 
 the people, wisely at length left to themselves, turned again to beer, 
 and as time progressed intoxication became less common. When 
 one compares the state of things described by Mr. Maitland, with 
 the moral condition of the people of Canada to-day, he will 
 realise the vast dift'erence between the two. A more sober, a 
 more orderly, law-abiding people than Canadians do not exist to- 
 day on the face of God's earth, and no people need less legal 
 restraint of any kind, or can be more safely intrusted with the 
 fullest possible personal liberty as to what they shall eat or what 
 they shall drink ; and in no country in the world is prohibitory 
 legislation, with all its attendant restrictions and annoyances, less 
 required. And further, in no country in the world to-day is 
 genuine temperance sentiment making more rapid advances than in 
 Ontario. As a daily newspaper very aptly remarks, the only class 
 of people among whom intemperance seems to be on the increase is 
 the Prohibition class. They cannot for the life of them, let well 
 enough alone, and their meddling and muddling will be sure to do 
 much harm, and, as in the case of the Scott Act, retard the pro- 
 gress of true temperance instead of promoting it. " Prohibition," 
 said Professor Clark of Trinity College, Toronto,* "is a serious 
 interference with personal freedom. It is alcohol to-day, it may be 
 tobacco to-morrow, it may be something else the day after. This is 
 not the way to make men good, or true, or strong. *(= * * It 
 is sometimes terrible to see a teetotaller eat, and Sir Henry 
 Thompson (a celebrated physician) says that over-eating (gluttony) 
 does more harm physically and morally than over-d linking (drunk- 
 enness). Prohibition leads to secret drinking and the morphine 
 habit. The latter is comparatively unknown in Canada, whereas 
 it prevails extensively in the United States." f 
 
 * Professor Clark's letter to the Daily Mail, Nov. 22nd, 1893. 
 
 + " What then is to be done ? " said Professor Goldwiu Smith. " 1 must 
 answer that my faith is fixed first of all on the natural and unforced infiu- 
 ences, of which the churi;h, the school, the Christian home, the enlightened 
 community, and last, not least, the oracles of medical science, are the organs. 
 The effects wrought by these influences, unlike those wrought by legislative 
 coercion, are pui-ely good, free from all drawbacks, connected with the 
 general strengthening of the character and sure to be lasting. In the habits 
 
 to 2.50,000,000 barrels.. A similar change in popular drinking habits is also 
 seen in England, and more strikingly still in Canada. The advent of the 
 bicycle will have a very wide effect in promoting greater abstemiousness as 
 regards the use of liquor. 
 
12 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 While the people of Canada have fortunately been able to sur- 
 mount every difficulty which has beset their national existence since 
 confederation, and safely weather every storm, they have now to 
 confront a new and most formidable danger in the Prohibition 
 movement recently inaugurated. Should this movement prove a 
 success, a new state of things will arise which cannot fail to pro- 
 duce the most disastrous results. Viewing it from a financial, a 
 moral, or even a leligious, stand-point, no question of equal social 
 importance has ever before been submitted for the consideration of 
 the people of Canada, and its calm and thorough discussion cannot 
 fail to be highly beneficial to them, and materially aid them in 
 coming to a just verdict thereupon. It is for them to say whether 
 they will bend to the tyrannical yoke of a general Prohibitory Law 
 which an intemperate fanaticism now seeks to fasten upon their 
 necks, or whether they will continue, as at present, to promote the 
 best interests of true temperance by a wise adherence to the princi- 
 ple of religious and moral suasion, and to the reasonable restriction 
 of the liquor traffic by good license laws, which, without interfering 
 with personal liberty, give all due protection ^^^o ^he public. 
 
 of the wealtliy!(class in England during the last half century a marvellous 
 improvement has taken place, not only without coercive legislation, but in 
 spite of the temptation presented by unlimited command of the richest 
 liquors. Canon Farrar ii able exultingly to count his total abstainers in 
 England by the myriad, and all this is the result of freedom. Every old 
 inhabitant of this country testifies to a spontaneous reform of the same kind, 
 and says that the time was when excess was deemed a point of hospitality, 
 and the Canadian farmer often went home drunk from market, whereas now 
 our farmers are almost univen-ally temperate, and excess even in the great 
 cities is comparatively rare. If a distinction could be made between the 
 native Canadian and the emigrant. Canada's bill of moral health, it is 
 believed, would be cleaner still." — Temperance versus Prohibition. (1884) 
 page 21. 
 
CHAPTER II. 
 THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF PROHIBITION. 
 
 ON the morning of September 3rd, 1896, the Premier of the 
 Dominion, now Sir Wilfred Laurier, was waited upon at 
 Ottawa by a temperance delegation, who asked that his Govern- 
 ment should submit a Prohibition plebiscite to the electorate of 
 the Dominion. His answer to tins request was, that this plebiscite 
 was part of the Liberal programme, as adopted at the convention 
 of 1893, and would be carried into effect within the very shortest 
 possible limit.* Sir Oliver Mowat was present on that occasion, 
 and used the following language, which, although very guarded in 
 its tone, is well worthy of the careful consideration of every 
 elector : — 
 
 "If Prohibition wa^ a practicable thing it was also a right thing. He 
 dill not pretend to feel perfectly certain about iti being a practicable thing, 
 for they could not be certain that public sentiment is such that a law of that 
 kind could be enforced throughout the country. It was a very important, in 
 fact an essential, thing to have popular sentiment in such a condition that a 
 Prohibitory law could be enforced. It was also importan^; that popular 
 opinion on the question should be obtained on this question free from any- 
 thing that might distract the attention of the voter. The Government 
 wished to have that vote as early as possible They wanted to know the 
 opinion of the people, and also to know whether the people are willing to hear 
 the burdfjis implied hy the adoption of Prohibition. The object was well 
 worth the burden — (cheers) — but did our people feel that way ? Was the 
 sentiment strong enough to enable them to bear the burdens and privations, 
 if there were privations, attending such a law ? " 
 
 It will be seen from the language of Sir Oliver, that the Govern- 
 ment desired to ascertain the opinion of the people upon two 
 important points, namely, (1st) whether they were in favor of 
 Prohibition, and (2nd) whether they were prepared to bear the 
 burdens it must necessarily place upon their backs, presuming it 
 were adopted. And this is, unquestionably, the true form in which 
 this important question should be submitted to the people, unless 
 the matter of compensation to vested interests would also be con- 
 sidered. If they desired Prohibition they should honestly be pre- 
 
 ♦ See Globe of September 4th, 1896. 
 + Olobe of above date. 
 
14 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 pared to pay for all the burdens it must entail. The Toronto GloJ>e 
 realised the full force of this aspect of the question, and with the 
 view of educating its readers thereupon, the following article 
 appeared in its issue of September 14th, 189G : — 
 
 HOW WILL WE RAISE $7,089,556? 
 
 " The question of public revenue is inseparable from any discussion of the 
 prohibition of the liquor traffic. Every nation ac(niirea the habit of paying 
 its taxes through certain channels, and, although these channels may have 
 no reason for existence except habit iind use, extensive disturbances cannot 
 be made without far-reaching consequences. In the Dominion the tax col- 
 lected by the Inland Revenue Department on spirits, malt and malt liquor 
 for the year ending June 30, 1893. was $5,09(3,454. That does not include 
 $3,285 realized from seizures, nor $1'2.39() levied on methylated spirits. The 
 customs department collected on imports under the head oi "spirits" 
 $2,080,559. Omitting from this the tax on cordials, elixirs, perfumes, etc , 
 the collection on brandy, gin, rum and whiskey reached $1,993,102, making, 
 in customs and excise on such liquor as may fairly be regarded as used for 
 leverage purposes, $7,089,556. Under a prohibitory liquor law there would 
 he the necessity of making good that amount. Prohibition would do away 
 with the necessity of much legal and governmental machinery, and might, as 
 contended, lessen greatly the cost of criminal law administration. But the 
 Dominion revenue stated is by no means all the taxation collected through 
 the liquor traffic. Proviucial and municipal revenues would also be affected, 
 and there wou'd be the need of special machinery to euforce the restriction, 
 Roughly offsetting these accounts against one another, it is safe to esti- 
 mat;. tl; it the loss in Federal revenue would have to be made good by some 
 other miithod of taxation under a prohibitory system. We invite suggestions 
 as to the best methods of making good the $7,089,556 delicit in the event of 
 that tax beinp relinquished by prohibition. Taxation is the most unsettled 
 of Oovemmtald operations, and no loubt many of our readers will be able 
 to give valuable Mnts =3 to the best method of displacing and making good 
 the liquor tax." * 
 
 As will be seen from the foregoing article, the total Federal 
 revenue arising from ihe i manufacture and importation of liquors, 
 during the fiscal year ending June 30th, 1895, amounted to 
 $7,089,556. But the loss to che Dominion exchequer of this large 
 amount, although over twenty per cent of the entire revenue for 
 the same year,t is only a part of the price, and not the largest part 
 either, which the people of Canada will be called upon to pay for 
 the luxury of Prohibition. As the Globe very truly states, " pro- 
 vincial and municipal revenues would also be affecte<l ; and then 
 there would be the cost of the special machinery necessary to 
 enforce the act." Let us now look at the facts which confront us 
 in these directions. In 1896 the Province of Ontario levied a tax 
 upon liquor licenses of $268,172,and on brewer'sand distiller'slicenses 
 of $18,250, or $286,422 altogether; while the municipalities receiv- 
 ed, .as their share, of the same tax, $267,072, making a total of 
 $553,494. Quebec also derives a very large income from its liquor 
 licenses. The revenue arising from the same source in the six other 
 
 * There were quite a number of replies made to the request, but the 
 burden of most of them was that the delicit must be made good by direct 
 taxation in some shape. 
 
 tThe total revenue for that year was $33,978,129. 
 
, I'll 
 
 OF PROHIBITION. 15 
 
 provinces of the Dominion (including the Noi t!: West) will be fully 
 $200,000. The net provincial and municipal revenue <lerived from 
 licenses throughout the whole Dominion may accordingly be put at 
 about $1,400,000. It will therefore be seen that the total annual 
 loss to the public revenue, which must be caused by the adoption 
 of Prohibition, would be some eight and a half million dollars, 
 which the farmers and other property owners of the country would 
 have to make good by some sort of direct taxation. Assuming our 
 whole population to be now five millions, and the heads of families, 
 who might be called property owners, at 800,000, each elector of 
 this class would have to pay nearly eleven dollars per annum to 
 make good the deficiency in the ^ederal, provincial and municipal 
 revenues. As clergymen, who aie the prime movers in this matter, 
 arc not taxed, as a rule, upon their incomes, they would wholly 
 escape this burden, and their share of it would have to be paid by 
 the ordinary taxpayer. In this case, therefore, like the Jewish 
 clergymen of old time, they seek to place a load on the backs of 
 the laity, no part of which would be borne by themselves. 
 
 The census of 1891 showed that there were 150 brewers and 
 malsters in the Dominion, with a total capital of $8,534,953, whose 
 annual wage bill amounted to $906,681, and whose total output 
 per year was $5,955,252. Of this sum it may be safely assumed 
 that at least two hundred thousand dollars were paid to our 
 farmers for hops, and one and a half million dollars for barley. In 
 addition to the large market this industry creates for our agricul- 
 tural products, the farmers for miles around every brewery find 
 the grains, or barley residue after beer-making, of great value for 
 their stock, and especially if their grass or fodder is scarce. The 
 statistics of the liquor traflic have not changed materially since the 
 Royal Commission marie its report thereupon, based on the trans- 
 actions for the years 1890 and 1891. That report states that the 
 annual revenue of the several provinces, derived from licenses, 
 amounted to $924,358, and that received by municipalities from 
 the same source to be $429,107. It also gives the total amount 
 annually paid out by brewers and distillers as follows ; — 
 
 Products of the farm $2,382,765 
 
 Annual wages bill 1,194,046 
 
 For fuel 170,000 
 
 Freights by water and railroad 450,000 
 
 Casks, bottles and cases 206,455 
 
 Capsules, corks, etc 76,186 
 
 Printing and advertising, etc 79,897 
 
 Repairs, etc 47,005 
 
 Insurances 151,685 
 
 Gas, taxes and water supply 123,1 18 
 
 Cutting and drawing ice 36,757 
 
 Sundries not enumerated 121,995 
 
 Total $5,039,992 
 
 •7 
 
16 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 The capital invested in the liquor business, as shown by tho last 
 census, is : — 
 
 Distilleries ' $ 7,054,000 
 
 Breweries 8,311, 453 
 
 Malt houses 223,500 
 
 Cider mills 136,795 
 
 Wine presses 396,475 
 
 Total $16,122,225 
 
 The Royal Comrnis&ion rated the value of the hotels, ami other 
 buildings or places for retailing liquor in the Dominion, at $38,- 
 000,000, the depreciation in the value of which, in the event of 
 Prohibition being carried, would certainly not be less than one- 
 third, or $12,666,667, independent of the loss on fixtures, which 
 might safely be estimated at one million dollars. In the event of 
 the adoption of Prohibition, time, no doubt, would be given to dis- 
 pose of the stocks op. hand, and to export the liquors in bond. We 
 shall not, therefore, take into consideration any losses which might 
 be suffered in this direooion. The wine-making industry of Canada 
 has, in recent years, reached very large proportions; and represents 
 to-day a capital of fully half a million dollars, pay out in wages at 
 least fifty thousand dollars annually, and have a total output of 
 three hundred thousand dollars per year. Prohibition would at 
 once kill off this large, very valuable, and constantly increasing 
 industry, and bring ruin to numbers of our most intelligent 
 farmers, who have put all their surplus means into it. 
 
 Prom the foregoing figures, based upon the most accurate infor- 
 mation attainable from government blue books and other reliable 
 . sources, the value of the vast industries and interests that will be 
 destroyed by Prohibition will be seen at a glance. All these 
 industries, and all these interests, have sprung into existence by 
 the authority of the Parliaments, and therefore of the people of 
 Canada, and in good faith. The advocates of Prohibition claim 
 that they stand on high moral ground, and that they would not, 
 for a moment, entertain the idea of being guilty of any act of dis- 
 honesty, or even of a questionable character, in its support. The 
 Christian ministers who everywhere lead the Prohibition movement 
 stand up Sunday after Sunday in their pulpits, and refer you to 
 presumed Biblical teaching to justify their proceedings. In other 
 words, having first formed their Prohibition creed, they turn to the 
 Bible in order to find something there that will support it. Yet, 
 in utter contempt for the Pauline injunction, " that we must not 
 do evil that good may come,"* they wholly ignore the justice of 
 due compensation for vested interests, acquired, too, under the 
 protection and sanction of legal enactment, and unblushingly seek 
 to rob by Act of Parliament their fellow citizens of their property. 
 
 * Romans iii, S. 
 
f' 
 
 OF PIvOHIBTTION. 17 
 
 Just fancy a body of men, and women as well, who claim to be 
 strictly honest, and even, in a majority of cases, exceedingly religi- 
 ous, commencing what they assert to be a great moral movement 
 by committing acts of the grossest injustice, and most dishonest 
 spoliation. In their half.demented anxiety to get astride of the 
 backs of the people of Canada, in Sinbad's Old Man of the Sea 
 fashion, they are evidently prepared to stop at nothing, no matter 
 how illogical, how injurious, or how immoral it may be. In the 
 Mother Country, where, thank God, a true sense of British justice 
 and fair play still prevails, from the palace to the cottage, no sane 
 person would ever dream of totally destroying vast industries 
 without considering the question of compensation. Even the slave 
 owners of the West Indies, those traffickers in the bodies and souls 
 of immortal beings, were compensated by the British Parliament 
 for the loss of their human chattels ; and the same spirit of 
 honesty, of justice, of honour, should animate the people of 
 Canada. " Righteousness exalteth a nation,"* and persons engaged 
 in the manufacture and sale of wines, beer and spirits, however 
 we may dislike their occupation, should have fair and honest treat- 
 ment at the hands of all fair and honest people. A Prohibitory 
 law, like any other law, to bring any solid or enduring benefits to 
 the people of this Dominion, should be distinctly moral in all its 
 aspects, should be based upon the principles of everlasting justice, 
 and there should be no public dishonesty, no bad faith, no wrong- 
 doing of any kind connected therewith. Those people who, in 
 utter defiance of the eighth commandment, would plunder .their 
 neighbors, under the colour of legal enactment, solely because they 
 are engaged in occupations they dislike, should bear in mind that 
 '* honesty is the best policy," even from a Prohibition stand-point. 
 
 The Lord Chief Justice of England, Baron Russell, visited this 
 country a short time ago, and was accompanied by his son, Mr. 
 Charles Russell, an able lawyer, an active politician, a very 
 influential member of the English Liberal party, and a gentleman 
 who is fully competent in every way to give the best possible idea, 
 not only of the views and opinions of his own friends, but also of 
 those of the British public generally as well. In the autumn of 
 1896, Mr. Russell accorded an interview, at Montreal, to the 
 representative of the Daily Star of that city, to whom he gave 
 much interesting information as regards the temperance question 
 in England, and the recent defeat of Sir William Harcourt's local 
 option bill,* which he stated was owing to the fact that it did not 
 provide any compensation for vested interests. His (Harcourt's) 
 idea was to transfer the licensing power from the magistrates to 
 the municipal councils, with the right to issue licenses or refuse 
 them as these bodies might see fit. " You must not infer, how- 
 
 • Proverbs xiv, 34. 
 * See Montreal Star of September 3rd, 1896. 
 
,>'• 
 
 18 OENEHAL REVIEW 
 
 ever," s/iid Mr. Russoll, " that thu words local veto nioans in Eng- 
 land tho right of a inajority, in any spBoial part of th« country, to 
 refuse to allow licjuor to ha sold to the minority. The principle of 
 a majority holding its foot on the neck of a minority, is too 
 un-English to be tolerated for an instant. * * * The difficult 
 part of the whole temperance (juestion is that relating to compen- 
 sation. Suppose, continued Mr. Russell, that T ciftne to Montreal 
 now, and build a hotel, or a restaurant, or oven a saloon. I buy 
 furniture, and llttings, and advertise in the papers. Altogether I 
 spend $25,000. Six months hence the Canadian Parliament passes 
 a Prohibitory law. What are you going to do to compensate mo 
 for the loss of all the capital T have in the world ? Easy enough 
 to Hay that Parliament has the right to pass such laws us it may 
 see fit. It has the power to knock me down and pick my pocket if 
 it passes a special bill to that effect, no matter how unjust and 
 immoral such a bill would be. It may be Parliamentary not to 
 discuss compensation, but is it justice?" There cannot be the 
 slightest doubt that Mr. Russell correctly outlined British fooling 
 in this matter. Sir William Harcourt's local veto scheme, although 
 a very mild temperance measure of reform, did Jiot provide for 
 compensation, and that is the main reason why the English people 
 would have none of it. The exceedingly immoral scheme, which 
 has for its chief object to deprive a part of the Canadian people of 
 their properties, under the illusive plea of furthering the cause of 
 public morality, is based on the pernicious example of a few of the 
 adjoining states, is fostered in Canada by paid American profess- 
 ional temperance spouters, imported here to propagate their own 
 peculiar views, and should be denounced by every lover of British 
 justice and fair play. The terse and fair manner in which Mr. 
 Russell has put the justice of conapensation, merits the considera- 
 tion of every honest Canadian. 
 
 But aside from the great and direct loss which must be sustained 
 by brewers, distillers, wine-makers and farmers, in the event of 
 Prohibition, the huge gap it would cause in Dominion, provincial 
 and municipal revenues, the loss of an important home market for 
 the products of the farm, and the reduction of the working man's 
 wage bill, hotel property all over the country will be largely depre- 
 ciated in value. In the rural districts especially, the wayside and 
 village taverns, of such great usefulness to commercial and other 
 travellers, and to the farmer going to and from his market town, 
 which disappeared very generally under the Scott Act, will sustain 
 the same fate again, but necessarily to a much wider extent. All 
 oyer Ontario these useful hostelries, which have grown up with the 
 country, and have always hospitably given food and shelter to the 
 traveller at very low rates, as a result of the profit of their little 
 bars, will be either wholly blotted out of existence, or be compelled 
 to raise their tariff of charges, as under the Scott Act, to a height 
 which the farmer could not afford to pay. Many a traveller 
 will recollect what straits he was put to at times to secure 
 
v« 
 
 OF PUOHIIUTION. 19 
 
 a nijj;ht's lodjijin)? or a nioal in Hoinn Imiiilot, whom the whilom 
 hospitablit littli; inn, in which, hko Shakospcaro, hu could take his 
 ease hitherto, had closed its doors owing to the Scott Act. Were 
 it not for the kindness of private fanulies, who on many occasion'* 
 oharitahly took in the stramleil wayfarer, he would be left without 
 either food or shelter. Commercial travellers, especially, who had 
 of necessity to visit these small c(Mitres of business, were frecjuently 
 very badly cornered. American ttmrists, who every sumujer spend 
 a good deal of money in Canada, shunned, as a rule, Scott Act 
 districts, and e.\cursion steamers passing up or down our lakes and 
 rivers rarely stopped where the inhospitable law was in force. All 
 these things will be readily remembered by many of our readers, 
 and how completely the Hcott Act put the normal conditif»n of 
 things generally out of joint. Nor can it be shown, at the same 
 time, that the Scott Act ever reformed a single habitual drunkard. 
 It may, it is true, have prevented the lowest atul most degraded 
 class of drunkards, who had formerly given a good deal of employ- 
 ment to our police courts, from getting liquor as freely as under the 
 old system ; but among persons immediately above that class it 
 was notorious that it greatly stimulated intemperance. In the 
 latter case the offenders having plenty of friends to take care of 
 them, and being naturally orderly and circumspect, rarely got into 
 the clutches of the law. The good policy and justice of causing 
 vast losses to a whole country, and interfering with the full liberty 
 and personal independence of its people, in order to prevent a few 
 habitual drunkards, here and there, from obtaining liquor, may 
 indeed be very gravely questioned by all soberly-thinking persons. 
 
 HOW IS PROHIBITION TO BE ENFORCED ? 
 
 There is another phase of the question under consideration, 
 which is of the greatest importance, namely, how is Prohibition to 
 be enforced ? It would be a most unwise and even immoral course 
 of procedure to pass a Prohibitory Law, unless the fullest possible 
 provisions were made for its enforcement. Nor should this duty be 
 left to provincial governments or municipal bodies, [t should, on 
 the contrary, be undertaken by the Federal Government. Most of 
 us will recollect how the dual authority conflicted under the Scott 
 Act, while it was in operation in Ontario ; and that what was 
 everybody's business became in the end, to a large extent, 
 nobody's business, until finally the law developed into an utter 
 abomination to the people of the province, and was everywhere 
 repealed. When we take into consideration the vast extent of the 
 frontier line to be policed in order to prevent the smuggling of 
 liquor from the United States, it is plain that the Federal Govern- 
 ment is alone equal to the task, if it could at all be performed, 
 which is very doubtful. Owing to its peculiar geographical posi- 
 tion, Canada is the most difficult country in the world in which to 
 enforce Prohibition. Its five million of people represent a narrow 
 
▼ < 
 
 10 (lENKHAL REVIEW 
 
 ribbon of population Htn^tohnd along a vast frontier lino, wliioli 
 could only bo polioo<l at an onormouH annual outlay.* Leaving out 
 our poHSOHsiona in the Arctic Heas, our Atlantic and British 
 Columbia coast HneH are 17,181 iniles in nxtont.f In addition the 
 length of the frontier line between Canada and the United States, 
 exclusive of the Alaska boundary, is 3,000 geographical miles, 
 1,400 of which lie on water, (rivers and lakes) and 1,600 miles on 
 land. To enforce Prohibition properly, and to prevent liquor 
 smuggling from the United States, this international boundary 
 will have to be sufficiently policed both by land and water ; while 
 at the same time, a largo body of inland revenue officers will have 
 to be maintained in order to prevent illicit distillation, (which 
 otherwise will be sure to speedily assume large proportions in every 
 hole and corner of Cana<la) and to keep down the illicit sale of 
 spirits. Where there is a demand for this article, as in every other 
 case, there will be sure to be a supply ; and to furnish that supply 
 there will be everywhere organisations of un8c**upulous and desper- 
 ate men who will stop at nothing to accomplish their purpose, that 
 is to make money, and a new class of dangerous criminals will thus 
 at once spring into existence, who will have to be kept down, no 
 matter wfiat the cost may be. Unless our vast frontier line is well 
 guarded. Prohibition would merely transfer a large part of the 
 liquor trade of Canada to our American cousins over the border, 
 who in view of their McKinley and alien labour laws, and their 
 unfriendly trade policy generally, should not be permitted to make 
 money out of us at present, in any form, either illicit or otherwise. 
 We have an expensive and moat difficult task to perform just now 
 to prevent the smuggling of liquor along the lower St. Lawrence, 
 and on our Pacitic coast line. During the recent session of Parlia- 
 ment, the government asked for a grant of $5,000 for a secret 
 service fund to be used to pay informers, and to prevent smuggling 
 below Quebec. This grant was assailed by the Opposition, and 
 while defending it Sir Richard Cartwright stated, that this smug- 
 gling had become a system, with a complete organisation which 
 had its chief headcjuarters at Quebec. The loss to the revenue was 
 estimated at $800,000 a year, and worse still this evil of smuggling 
 was demoralizing the people of whole parishes. " It would be 
 impossible," said ho, ** to bring home guilt to the principals without 
 the aid of informers." J "When such a bad state of things prevails 
 
 * It ia now estimated that the coat of policing the Klondyke district alone, 
 and preserving law and order there, will cost the Dominion a quarter of a 
 million of dollars annually. 
 
 t Statistical Year Book of Canada for 1&95, p.p. 98, 100. 
 
 + The following deapatcbes to the Montreal Star, will give a ^ood idea of 
 what smuggling means along a small part only of our frontier ; and the 
 terrific state of things that a general Prohibitory law would produce from 
 one end of the Dommion to the other : — 
 
 Ottawa, July 8. 1897.— Despite the untiring efforts to stamp out smuggling 
 in the St. Lawrence, little has been effecten ; practically only one seizure 
 having been made. The authorities state that the men who carry oa this 
 
OF PllOHrniTION. 21 
 
 nUmn tho lower St. L)iwrniicM>, witli a licenso MyHttMU wliioh permita 
 mlullH to obtain, without any <lilKculty, all tlie liquor they require, 
 our HMulerH win roudily j<(iu^<' for thoinsnIveH the t«rrible dihonlom, 
 on a vuHt Hoalu, that will 8ur«>ly follow a Dominion Prohibition law, 
 and tho tiUinio nature of tht^ task which niutit b«^ undertaken in 
 order to enforce it. The coat of its enforcement, even under the 
 most favourable ciroumstuncos, will certainly be very groat, and 
 cannot fail to be a severe strain on the resources of the Domiuioa, 
 oven should they prove ecjual to it. As thingH now stand our Pro- 
 hibition friends ask us to takt; a blind leap into an unknown region 
 of great ditticulty and even danger. 
 
 If the people of Canaila desire to indulge in the very expensive 
 luxury of a Dominion Prohibition law, covering land and water 
 from the Atlantic to the Pacirtc Ocean — from the Ameri. nn boun- 
 dary line to tho Arctic regions — and two thousand miles up the 
 Yukon country, or some twenty-three thousand miles altogether, 
 (for that is the vast area which will come under its sway) they had 
 bettor first count the cost, and look into the whole matter most 
 carefully before they betake themselves to the ballot box. They 
 should not allow a comparatively few narrow minded-persons, who 
 have small interests at stake, to do the whole thinking, as weU as 
 the whole talking for them. It should not bo forgotten, too, how 
 very careless electors sometimes are about voting at all on ques- 
 tions of the character now under discussion. As regards the great 
 masses of the Canadian people there is no strong feeling, as a rule, 
 behind these questions, no political or personal ambitions to be 
 
 contraband trade become more cautious year by year, and do not carry on 
 their operations twice running in the aame locality. The long unsettled 
 coaats afford them every facility for running in and landing tfoods under 
 cover of the darkneas. Quebec is still the destination of most of the smuggl- 
 ed stuff, and the whole scheme is worked from there. The goods are almost 
 invariably transferred from the smuggling craft to another vessel off shore, 
 and in this way the chance of detection in minimized. In many cases the 
 feeling prevails that the Minister of Customs is warranted in taking the most 
 radical steps to wipe out this traffic. 
 
 Quebec, July 19, 1897. — The recent increase in the duties imposed by the 
 Canadian Government upon the importation of spirituous liquors has given a 
 fresh impetus to smuggling so extensively carried on in the Gulf of St. 
 Lawrence, as well as to the illicit manufacture o'' alcohol in the country. la 
 the very heart of this city a few days ago, a large illicit still was found in full 
 operation in the upper part of an old house, and now comes the news that a 
 group of similar stills has been seized at Stoneham, some twenty miles from 
 Quebec, away up in the mountains, where the yield of contraband whiskey 
 was so large that it meant a loss of revenue of $500 a day. 
 
 While some seizures are being made on shore, the pirates of the gulf have 
 practically everything their own way. With the steam cruiser Constance 
 constantly on the lookout for the smugglers, and with lines of telegraph 
 along both the north and south shores of the river and gulf, the government 
 is thus far quite powerless to check the evil. Some idea of the enormous 
 extent of the smugglers' operations may be gained from the fact that not- 
 withstanding the higher duties upon alcoholic liquors, and the certainty that 
 there is no decrease in their consumption, the diminution in the revenue 
 from this source amounts to several thousands of dollars a ilay. 
 
22 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 subserved, and hence indifferentism very largely prevails. It was 
 this state of things that led to the Scott Act being so generally 
 adopted in Ontario in 1884, to be subsequently voted out of sight 
 after the people had fully experienced the indignities, the tyran- 
 nies, and the moral disorders it produced. The Ontario plebiscite 
 of January 1st, 1894, was carried by the large majority of 81,730, 
 solely owing to the apathy, the indifference, of the majority of the 
 electorate, men and women — for women were also permitted to 
 vote on that occasion. The total male vote of the Province at that 
 date was 481,499, the total female vote, 42,492 ; or 523,991 alto- 
 gether. The whole number of votes polled was 303,244, so that 
 220,747 votes remained unpolled. There can be no doubt that the 
 Prohibition vote turned out on that occasion in its full strength. 
 It footed up to 192,487, leaving a vote against it, polled and 
 unpolled, of 331,504. This state of things very plainly showed 
 that if all those who were virtually opposed to Prohibition had 
 gone to the polls, it would have been defeated by an actual major- 
 ity of 139,017 votes. Past experience clearly shows, both in the 
 case of the Scott Act* and otherwise, that a Prohibitory law can 
 never be properly enforced unless where the sympathy of the 
 people is fully behind it. The prospective plebiscite therefore, to 
 be of any real value, should be sustained by a majority of the 
 whole Dominion electorate, and no Prohibition legislation should 
 be based on the vote of a minority. The plebiscite ballot, in all 
 fairness and honesty, should put three questions to be answered, 
 either yes or no, by the elector, namely : (1) Are you in favour of 
 Prohibition ? (2) Are you in favour of compensation to all legal 
 interests which may be adversely affected ? (3) Are you willing to 
 submit to direct taxation, not only as regards the losses sustained 
 by the public revenues of the country, but also as regards compen- 
 sation, and the expenses of enforcing the act ? If the people of 
 Canada desire a Prohibitory law they should be willing to pay, 
 honestly and fully, for all the needed outlay connected therewith ; 
 and in order to be in a position to do so, the levy of a direct 
 Federal tax upon the whole property of the country is the only 
 practical financial solution which presents itself. At present the 
 ordinary sources of the public revenue are scarcely adequate to 
 meet the current expenditure ; and new modes of taxation will 
 have to be devised to meet the additional requirements of a Prohi- 
 bitory law. We need scarcely s^^y, that the advocates of such a 
 law are not in favour, by any means, of submitting the whole 
 questions involved to the electorate, and seek to snatch a verdict 
 on one issue alone. And in order to snatch that verdict they 
 would like to deceive the people into the belief that they would 
 not have to make good the vast outlay involved, and that the 
 
 * The Scott Act was also carried in Ontario by a minority vote. In an 
 aggregate of counties of which the total electorate was 398,764. the total 
 number of votes cast for the Scott Act was only 123,680, more than two- 
 fifths of the electors having either voted against it or stayed at home. 
 

 OF PROHIBITION. 23 
 
 Federal government would, in some mysterious way, provide for 
 that outlay without adding to their existing burdens. Nothing 
 could be more dishonest — more practically delusive, than a course 
 of this kind. How strange is it that men who preach truth and 
 righteousness from the pulpit or the platform, deliberately lend 
 themselves to a double-dealing policy of this kind — to the acting 
 out of a practical and palpable lie. At the annual meeting of 
 the Dominion Alliance for the suppression of the liquor traffic, held 
 in Toronto on the 14th of last July, (1897) it was clearly shown by 
 the language of the principal speakers, that they were opposed to 
 have the people vote upon the whole (juestion at issue, and held 
 that a part of it only should be submitted to the electorate at the 
 coming plebiscite. We now add, for the information of our 
 readers, some extracts from the press despatch giving a synopsis of 
 the proceedings at that meeting : — 
 
 The chairman said they had met to take counsel as to the best method to 
 be pursued under the present condition of affairs. He had hoped that the 
 Dominion plebiscite bill would have been submitted to Parliament at the last 
 session, but he was not going to say anything condemnatory of the govern- 
 ment. He held that if the question of prohibition was to be submitted in 
 connection with a vote in regard to direct taxation it would be most dishon- 
 orable and unfair. The government already had sufficient information to 
 submit a Prohibitory measure to the people. The information which had 
 been obtained presented a mass sufficient to justify the prohibition legislation 
 asked for. 
 
 Rev. Dr. Lucas was firm in the belief that if, in the final proclamation 
 regarding the plebiscite, there was reference to direct taxation, the vote 
 would go against the measure, and that it would wreck the Laurier Govern- 
 ment. 
 
 Rev, Dr. Ross, Brantford, was of opinion that the government would not 
 add such a rider to the proclamation, and was not at all alarmed for the fate 
 of the measure by means of this cry. What he feared most was that a clear 
 majority of the votes of those registered might be required, as asked by the 
 liquor men, before the measure became law. This might jeopardize the 
 measure, as so many of the electorate might abstain from voting as to render 
 a clear majority of those on the lists irapossiWe. He believed that such a 
 clear majority of the voters had never been obtained by any government. 
 
 The Plebiscite Committee's report recommended that tlie Executive Com- 
 mittee urge upon Provincial Executives the perfecting of county and local 
 organization at as early a date as possible. Also that the Executive Com- 
 mittee form a platform bureau in each province with a list of speakers who 
 will be available for addressing meetings. 
 
 A short discussion took place on the last clause, occasioned by Rev. Mr. 
 StafFor' iggesting that the word " Canadian " be inserted before the word 
 " speakers, so that none but Canadian speakers be employed, they being 
 better acquainted with the conditions in Canada than those in the United 
 States. 
 
 Dr. Ross favored the suggestion, as by adopting such means professional 
 temperance speakers would be kept out. 
 
 A delegate from Quebec said that they would employ good men wherever 
 they could get them. 
 
 Others thought it would not be well to prohibit the engaging of well- 
 known temperance men from the United States. 
 
 The report was adopted without the change being made. 
 
 The language used in the Alliance meeting with regard to sub- 
 mitting only a part of the whole question at issue to the electors, 
 
24 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 has been re-echoed all over the country at every Methodist gather- 
 ing of any importance. The Prohibitionists fear to submit the 
 whole case to the great jury of the Dominion electorate, and would 
 like to hocus-pocus that jury in some way, so that a snap verdict 
 might be had on a part of it only. It will be also seen from the 
 quotations we have made, that the Rev. Dr. Lucas, a professional 
 Prohibition advocate, assumes the prophetic role, and threatens 
 that if there were any reference or allusion to direct taxation in 
 the plebiscite proclamation, it would wreck the Laurier govern- 
 ment. In other words this open threat implies, that if the Laurier 
 government were not sufficiently subservient in the matter the 
 Methodist support would be withdrawn from it. That government 
 very gallantly withstood the powerful hierarchy of the Province of 
 Quebec. It remains to be seen whether it will surrender to the 
 bullying of the Methodist clerical body in Ontario, who would 
 evidently like to rule the roost there just as absolutely as their 
 prototypes down the St. Lawrence. It is to be sincerely hoped 
 that the government of Sir Wilfred Laurier will show the same 
 manly independence of clerical rule in Ontario that it has in 
 Quebec. We are inclined to regard Dr. Lucas as simply playing 
 the role of the false prophet in a very unscrupulous sort of way, 
 for the purpose of intimidation, and to hold the insolent lash 
 of the withdrawal of Methodist political support over the heads of 
 the Federal administration, and just as it is held over the Hardy 
 government of Ontario. Let us filch for the nonce a little of Dr. 
 Lucas' prophetic afflatus. Just as sure as the Laurier government 
 submits the plebiscite without the taxation or compensation clauses 
 and simple Prohibition is carried in consequence, and the concur- 
 rent legislation goes into effect, so sure will a chaotic state of 
 things arise from che Atlantic to the Pacific that half a dozen 
 governments would go down before it. This question is one of the 
 gravest character imaginable, and the whole electorate, and not 
 the Federal government, should assume the full responsibility in 
 the premises. The government should be the agents of the people's 
 will in the matter and nothing more, and should not be embarrass- 
 ed by the creation of a condition of affairs, that must speedily ruin 
 any cabinet, no matter how strong its support might be. Assum- 
 ing, at the same time, that the plebiscite were favourable to Prohi- 
 bition, Parliament, when enacting the necessary legislation, should 
 make the most ample provision for its enforcement, so that the 
 measure might have a full and fair trial, and thus prevent cavil for 
 all time to come. If it fails, as it will be sure to fail, let it be dis- 
 tinctly on its merits, and not from any radical defect in the 
 machinery provided to enforce it. 
 
CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE TEMPERANCE MOVEMENT, 
 
 "VT/^HAT is called the Temperance movement had its origin 
 VV in the United States, some seventy-one years ago. In 
 February, 1826, " The American Temperance Society " was organ- 
 ised in the city of Boston, with the object, " to restrain and prevent 
 the use of intoxicating liquors." In 1829, " The New York State 
 Temperance Society " was formed, with the same platform as its 
 Boston predecessor ; and before the close of that year fully 
 one thousand affiliated local societies were in operation. A 
 monthly periodical, entitled the " Journal of Humanity," was 
 established to promote the new movement. News of the progress 
 of temperance in the United States soon reached the Cld World ; 
 and in August, 1829, a society was started in Ireland at New 
 Ross, in the County of Wexford, the members of which pledged 
 themselves to abstain from the use of ardent spirits, but not from 
 beer or wine. In the same year the movement spread to Belfast, 
 in the north of Ireland, and also to Scotland, where it speedily 
 acquired a large membership. In 1830 numerous total abstinence 
 societies were formed, which, however, permitted to its members 
 tlie use of ordinary small beer, and wine for sacramental purposes. 
 In the latter part of the year the movement extended to England, 
 where the first society was formed at Bradford. In 1834 were 
 formed what are termed teetotal societies, which pledged their 
 members against the use of all intoxicating liquors. In 1838 
 Father Matthew founded Ireland's " National Temperance Asso- 
 ciation," which did much to abate the excessive drinking habits of 
 the Irish people of that day. Despite the great poverty of the 
 people, the population of the little island of some 306 miles in 
 length, and averaging about 150 in breadth, much of which is bog 
 and mountain, had increased prodigiously in the three preceding 
 decades, and now numbered over eight million souls, Father 
 Matthew 'li mission did much for the Irish people for a time, but its 
 results were not of a permanent character, and the old social 
 
26 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 habits were fast re-asserting themselves when the terrible famine 
 of 1845, owing to the potato rot, burst upon the land. 
 
 The temperance movement was very soon retarded, by the fierce 
 dissensions which arose between its more moderate and extreme 
 wings. These dissensions were presently still more embittered by 
 differences of opinion in regard to the chemical properties of the 
 wines of the Bible. The extremists asserted that these wines were 
 of two kinds, one non-fermented and therefore non-intoxicating, 
 which Christ and his disciples alone used ; and the other fermented 
 and intoxicating, which should not be used even for sacramentu ' 
 purposes. The original Hebrew text was appealed to. On a 
 critical examination it was found that at least a dozen difterent 
 designations for wine* were used in the Old Testament, but that 
 the two by far the most frequent were yayin and tirush. The 
 first of these is tlie generic Hebrew term for wine, corresponding 
 to the Greek oinas and the Latin vinum, with both of which it is 
 etymologically connected ; and the extremists accordingly contend- 
 ed that yayin means the fermented product of the grape, and is 
 the word used when wine is denounced. Hence it is that yayin 
 is a mocker (Prov. xx. 1), that is not to be looked upon when it is 
 red (Prov. xxiii. 31, 32). f On the other hand when wine is praised 
 in the Old Testament tirush is the word used, and means the grape 
 in clusters or their unfermented juice The true facts of the case 
 do not, however, at all warrant this contention. The word tirosh 
 occurs about forty times in the English Bible, and is invariably 
 translated, both in the old and new versions, as wine or new wine, 
 and is frequently referred to as intoxicating, as in Hosea iv. 2, 
 where yayin is applied to wine, and tirosh to new wine. " Whore- 
 dom, and yayin and tirosh take away the understanding." The 
 great Hebrew scholar, Gesenius, and numbers of the Jewish com- 
 mentators on the Talmud, declare that tirosh means new wine, and 
 that the wine used in the Passover has at all times been fermented 
 wine. I 
 
 As this sacramental question had never before been seriously 
 
 * These names no doubt denoted different kinds of wiue, and just as in the 
 present day one kind of wine is termed champagne, another port, another 
 sherry, and so on, 
 
 + Those who desire to arrive at right conclusions on this passage should 
 read the revised version carefully. Two things are condemned particularly 
 in these verses aud their contexts, namely, tarrying long at the wine, and 
 seeking out and using mixed wine. There was a custom among ancient 
 nations, as there is at the present time in oriental countries, of mixing an 
 extract of Indian hemp, and other noxious drugs, with wine just previous to 
 use. These gave it a fiery red colour, and a moving or sparkling motion just 
 like champagne ; and rendered it much more intoxicating, and at the same 
 time more pleasant to use. No doubt strong drink, or distilled spirits, in 
 some form, was also mixed with some wines by the Jews, as is done at 
 the present day. See also Burckhardt's Travels, page 25. 
 
 J See Presbyterian Review for January, 1882, for an able article on this 
 point. 
 
; 
 
 OF PROHIBITION. 27 
 
 raiaed in any of the orthodox Protestant churches, which had from 
 the Reformation always used fermented wine for eucharistic pur- 
 poses, the new contention speedily caused the most active discus- 
 siop throughout the British non-conformist denominations.* The 
 question assumed such larjje proportions, that it presently came up 
 for discussion in the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church 
 of In land, held in the city of Londonderry on the 8th of June, 
 18.^5. On that occasion Professor Watts, of the Presbj'terian 
 College of Belfast, submitted the following overture or request 
 from the Presbytery of that city : — 
 
 " That, whereas differences of opinion exist among the members of our 
 congregations, in regard to the kmd of wine appointed by our Lord to be 
 used in the celebration of His Supper ; and whereas these differences of opin- 
 ion have greatly disturbed the peace of our churches, and led, in some 
 instances, to what many regard as grave departures from the teaching of 
 Scripture, in the observance of this most sacred ordinance, this Presbytery 
 earnestly asks the Assembly to issue a pastoral letter to all the fiock over 
 which the Holy Ghost hath made them bishops, for their information and 
 guidance, setting forth authoritatively the views of the Presbyterian Church 
 m Ireland on this question." 
 
 In conformity with this request Professor Watts moved, seconded 
 by Professor Wallace ; — 
 
 First — "That the Assembly approve the overture, and declare that, as the 
 wine used in the oblations under the Old Testament at the Passover, and by 
 the Lord Himself in the institution of the Supper, was the ordinary wine of 
 the country — that is, the fermented juice of the grape — they cannot sanction 
 the use of the unfermented juice of the grape as a symbol in the ordinance." 
 
 Second — " That the Assembly direct sessions to deal in a spirit of Chris- 
 tian charity with brethren whose consciences are troubled ; and, with this 
 view, and because we should eerve God with the purest which can be procur- 
 ed, recommend them to use a mild natural wine as most in accordance with 
 the institution of this sacrament and the general practice of the Church in 
 all ages." 
 
 Third — " That the Assembly deprecate the agitation for the introduction 
 of the unfermented juice of the grape ; affectionally exhort all the members 
 of the Church to adhere to the simple and significant usage of Scripture ; to 
 avoid minute questions and divisive courses ; to cherish brotherly kindness 
 and forbearance, and to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace ; 
 and when celebrating the dying of the Fjord Jesus Christ, to lift their 
 thoughts to the inestimable blessings which have been purchased by His 
 blood, and to seek that spiritual communion with Him, and that fellowship 
 with one another, which may be enjoyed by all who worthily partake of the 
 memorials of His sufferings." 
 
 Fourth — " That a committee be appointed, in accordance with the request 
 of the overture, to prepare a pastoral letter embodying these resolutions, as 
 setting forth authoritatively the views of the Presbyterian Church in Ireland 
 on this subject, a»d, if occasion require, to advise and assist the brethren in 
 carrying them into eCFect. " 
 
 The debate which ensued was an exceedingly able and learned 
 one as regards the fermented character of Bible wines, and ended 
 in the adoption of the motion by an almost unanimous vote. 
 Towards the close of the debate the Rev. William Wright, who 
 
 • The Church of England firmly held to the use of fermented wine, and 
 does so yet. 
 
28 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 had been the Assembly's missionary in Syria for the previous ton 
 years, made the following statement :— 
 
 Mr. Moderator and Brother Presbyters, — I find the afiscrtion iterated again 
 and again by the advocates of the wine of division, that a non-fermented 
 wine is in cotninon use in Bible lands. This assertion, by bold and constant 
 repetition, has ch.anged the wine of communion and love into the wine of 
 division and strife. The assertion has been reiterated to-night again and 
 again. I have now a statement to read which I trust will set this question 
 at rest for ever. The statement is signed only by those missionaries and 
 residents of Syria who are specially qualitied to give an opinion on this sub- 
 ject, and who are all strictly men of temperance : — 
 
 " We, the undersigned, missionaries and residents in Syria, having been 
 repeatedly requested to make a distinct statement on the subject, hereby 
 declare that, during the whole time of our residence and travelling in Syria 
 and the Holy Land, we have never seen nor heard of an unfermented wine ; 
 nor have we found among Jews, Christians, or Mahommedans, any tradition 
 of such a wine having ever existed in the country. 
 
 ••Rev. VV. M. Thomson, D.D. Rev. S. H. Calhoun. 
 
 C. V. A. Van Dycke, D.D. Rev. James Robertson. 
 
 Rev. H. Jessuv. Rev. John Woktabet, M.D. 
 
 James Black, Ksg. Mjchael Meshaka, Doctor. 
 
 Rev. John Crawfoku. R. W. Briostocke, M.D., M.R.C.S., &c. 
 Rev. William Wright, B.A. 
 "May, 1875." 
 
 Dr. Thomson is the author of the Land and the Book, a book which I trust 
 is known by every Bible student in this assembly. It is, undoubtedly, the 
 best book, as Mr. Spurgeon said to me a few Sabbaths ago, that has ever 
 been written in illustration of Bible manners and customs. Dr. Thomson 
 has spent more than forty years in Syria and Palestine, in investigating the 
 manners and customs of the Land in order to throw light on the Book. He 
 has had full opportunity during that period to become actjuainted with every 
 minutise of the customs and inner life of the peojile of Bible lands, and yet 
 he never heard, in all that period, so much as a lingering tradition of an 
 unfermented wine. This would seeni a strong case to sensible men, but Mr. 
 Shanks, and American D. D. 's over the Atlantic, of course know better. 
 
 Mr. Calhoun is President of the Albeih Seminary, in the neighbourhood of 
 the best Vineyards in Syria. He has had opportunities of studying the uses 
 to which the grape is put for thirty- eight years, and yet he never heard even 
 a tradition of this " non-fermented wine in common use in Bible lands." 
 
 Dr. Van Dycke is the translator of the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures into 
 idiomatic and classic Arabic, and has resided for thirty-live years in Syria 
 and Palestine. He is perhaps the finest Arabic scholar in the world, and he 
 is equally at home in the'ancient Semitic languages. His perfect knowledge 
 of Arabic, and faultless use of it in the ears of the people, nearly cost him 
 his life during the massacre, when the Druses thought he was a native 
 Christian in disguise, for they said no foreigner could ever acquire the use of 
 the language as he had done. Dr. Van Dycke, it seems, though equally con- 
 versant with Greek, Hebrew, and modern Arabic, and with the customs and 
 modes of thought of the wine-growing Arabs, never heard even a tradition 
 of this Bible wine. 
 
 Mr. Robertson is an accomplished scholar in Rabbinical literature. He 
 has spent twelve years in Turkey and Syria in the close study of the Talmud 
 and cognate works. He is the author of the articles on the Talmud which 
 recently appeared in Good Words ; and he is now about to publish a volume 
 on the Talmud, from whicli I trust we shall all glean knowledge. 
 
 Dr. Jessup is the author of The Women of Syria. He is perhaps the most 
 eloquent and successful preacher in the mission field, and has resided for 
 nineteen years in Syria. 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 29 
 
 Dr. Wortabet, who is a native of Syria, received his education in Scotland, 
 and is now a Professor in the Protestant Syrian ('oUej^e, Beyrout. 
 
 Mr. Black is the friend of the missionaries, and has been for forty-ono 
 years resident in Syria. Aa a merchant he has done more than any other 
 man to raise the name of Englishmen in the Levant. 
 
 Dr. Meshaka is the Luther of Syria, and his works circulate wherever the 
 Arabic language is known. He is a Syrian, and is now far advanced in 
 years, and yet, like Dr. Wortabet, neither in his childhood nor his manhood, 
 nor yet in his old age, has he ever heard a tradition of this " wine in common 
 use m his native !and." 
 
 Mr. Crawford is the colleague of your missionaries. He has lived in Syria 
 for seventeen years, and has made a careful study of this question with a 
 view to the controversy going on in America. 
 
 Dr. Brigstocke, formerly of the British navy, has been for nine years a 
 successful doctor at Beyrout, and he is also a lecturer in the Protestant 
 Syrian College, Beyrout. He has been in the habit of spending his summers 
 in the Lebanon, in the neighbourhood of splendid vineyards, and he has had 
 ample opportunity, which he would not likely neglect, of studying the uses 
 to which the grape is put. 
 
 At the close of an explanatory letter, subsequently written on 
 the 7th July, 1875, at Ballynnskeagh, the Rev. William Wright 
 uses the following strong language, which we connnend to the con- 
 sideration of his Presbyterian bretliren in Canada : — 
 
 " The advocates of the wine of division suggest that, as a missionary, I 
 should have been neutral and silent on this question ; that is, that I should 
 assail hoary errors abroad, but spare incipient heresies at home. Now if 
 this were an abstract question, the discussion of which was likely only to 
 result in proving who had the strongest lungs, I should certainly be both 
 neutral and silent. But when the advocates and advertisers of a drink pre- 
 pared by one chemist, puffed as ' the only preparation of the kind now in 
 the Briti.sh market,' twist and pervert and wreit the Scriptures in the 
 interest of this unique preparation, and to the discredit of the holy cause of 
 temperance ; when in blindness, or blasphemously, they call in question the 
 wisdom and goodness of God, and brand as wine-bibbers Christ and His 
 followers who commune from the same cup, then I should be disloyal to Him 
 who gave the cup, and to those who have handed it down to us, did 1 permit 
 that cup to be tampered with on the strength of assertions which Providence 
 has placed me in a position to disprove. 
 
 " Might I be permitted to remind my temperance brethren that the Devil 
 tries to spoil what he cannot hinder, and that he is using their intemperate 
 advocacy to injure the cause of temperance— dear to every Irish Christian 
 and patriot. 
 
 ••WILLIAM WRIGHT.* 
 
 The foregoing extracts present the strongest testimony that can 
 be produced as to the fermented properties of Bible wines, and also 
 of the wines of Palestine at the present day. But the most 
 unlettered student can very easily learn by his own researches and 
 the aid of a good concordance, the true character of Bible wines 
 from the Bible itself, and especially from the revised translation, 
 the result of the most profound modern scholarship, both as 
 regards the Hebrew text of the Old Testament and the Greek text 
 
 • For the full text of this letter, as well as of the speeches of Professor 
 Watts and Wallace before the Assembly, see Yivjiii, or the Wine Question. 
 MuUan, Belfast, 1875. 
 
30 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 of the new. Paul tells Timothy that from his childhood ho had 
 known the sacred writings, which wore able to make him wise unto 
 Salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. " Every scripture 
 inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for 
 correction, for instruction, which is in righteouaness." (II Timothy 
 iii. 15, 16, revised version.) When Paul wrote that he had full 
 acquaintance with the Old Testament in the Septuagint, and in 
 very nearly the same foi-m in which we have it to-day. And as 
 all orthodox Christian people, no matter what church they belong 
 to, must firmly hold that everything necessary to salvation in the 
 Bible was divinely inspired, and that it contains the whole counsel 
 of Ood for the moral and religious direction and government of 
 mankind, it constitutes the true court of last appeal for the 
 removal of every doubt in the questions under discussion. We 
 shall now proceed to examine its plain teaching as to the character 
 of its wines, and the legitimate uses to be made of them. In doing 
 mt we shall use the revised version, as being in the majority of 
 cases the more critically exact, and expressing the meanings of the 
 Hebrew and (Jreek originals more clearly. 
 
 In the grandly sublime account of the creation, given to us in 
 Genesis, w find that God saw everything that he had made, and 
 behold it was very good. The vine was a part of the creation, and 
 its fruit, by the simple act of pressure of the hand, yielded a liquid 
 which had all the properties, saccharine and otherwise, of preser- 
 vation by fermentation within itself, and of becoming wine as it 
 were of its own accord. It required no process of distillation — no 
 scientific knowledge. The intelligence of the savage who was 
 competent to mould the rudest form of pottery, or to form a bag 
 from the skin of the animal slain for his sustenance, would be fully 
 equal to the production of wine. And subsequent events plainly 
 proved, without the shadow of .a doubt, that the Creator of the 
 world designed it should be so ; and that fermented wine, the only 
 legitimate product of the grape, should be one of his gifts, for the 
 use and benefit of mankind, throughout all time. Sixteen hundred 
 and fifty-seven years afterwards a notable event occurred in the 
 history of the human race, which clearly corroborates this view of 
 the case. When God determined to destroy all living flesh upon 
 the earth, because of the wickedness of mankind, the righteous 
 Noah alone found grace in his sight, and he and his family were 
 saved. What little we know of this patriarch shows him to have 
 been a man of culture, of wide information, and well versed in the 
 arts and sciences. When God directed him to build a huge ark, 
 fully equal in size to the great steamships that now plough the 
 seas, and very nearly of the same dimensions, no special instruc- 
 tions as to working details were given him — only the general plan. 
 The hewing, and squaring, and bending into shape, of all the great 
 beams of gopher wood, the forging of all the bolts and nails 
 required for the big three decker, and the making of pitch so that 
 its seams might be made water-tight, were all well within Noah's 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 31 
 
 already acquired knowledge. His well-built ship safely weathers 
 the winds and the storms, and when the deluge is all over securely 
 rests upon an Armenian mountain. He presently descends into 
 the pleasant plain below, whose natural fertility is now stimulated 
 by the rich alluvial deposit left behind by the retiring waters. 
 One of his first acts was to plant a vineyard, for which his 
 practical knowledge of viticulture, acquired long before, enabled 
 him to select the best and most prolific grape vines. His vineyard 
 in that warm and fertile region was covered with grapes the 
 second or third year. And we are told that he drank of the wine 
 which he made therefrom, and became intoxicated ; and that as 
 one consequence of his sin a curse rested upon Canaan and his 
 posterity. What a memorable series of incidents ! The antedilu- 
 vian past had disappeared, a new future had dawned upon the 
 world ! If God designed that the culture of the grape and the 
 making of wine should be forbidden to man, as sources of evil 
 to him, the true crisis for interference had now surely arisen. 
 iJut there was no Divine interference — no command to discontinue 
 the cultivation of the grape nor the making of wine. Prohibi- 
 tionists practically assail the wisdom and goodness of God, as 
 regards his creatures, and virtually maintain that he did what was 
 wrong on that memorable occasion, and so inflicted a perpetual 
 injury on mankind. What audacious presumption — what positive 
 wickedness ! 
 
 Under the Jewish dispensation the tithe (tenth part) of the 
 wine, like that of the other products of the soil, was set apart for 
 the use of the priests and Levites, and God commanded wine to 
 bo used in the sacrifices offered to himself.* The true character 
 of this wine may be gathered from the fact, that God, under the 
 penalty of death, expressly forbid the use of wine and strong drink 
 to A.aron and his sons, when they went into the tabernacle, or 
 tent of meeting, to conduct public worship, in order that they 
 might be in full possession of all their faculties, and be able to 
 instruct the people properly, f If there were any such thing as 
 unfermented or non-intoxicating wine known at. that period, this 
 command would be as unnecessary as in the case of milk or water. J 
 But the clearest possible proof that Prohibition was never destined 
 to form any part of God's moral or religious law for the guidance 
 of mankind, and that the sale or purchase of wine, (tc, is perfectly 
 lawful, may be found in Deuteronomy xiv. 22 and following 
 
 * See Exodus xx. 40, Levitifcus xxiri. 13, aiul Numbers xii. 5. t Leviticus 
 X. 9-10. 
 
 t Strong drink, that is a liquor still more intoxicating than wine, was wcl 
 known to the ancients, as appears from recent archa-ological discoveries in 
 oriental countries. Arrack was distilled in India from time immemorial, and 
 the manufacture of beer had become one of the iuduatries of Chaldea centur- 
 ies before the time of Moses. Kecords in the British museum show that 
 discoveries in Chaldea have recently been made, which prove that beer and 
 wine shops existed at the time of Amraphel and Abraham (Genesis xiv. 1.) 
 
 il 
 
32 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 verses. Moses, the grandest figure in ancient Jewish or in any 
 
 history, wlio has been engaged in finally sumniing up the whole 
 
 counsel of Go<l to his chosen people, proceeds to say : — 
 
 '22 Thou slialt truly titho all the increase of thy seed, that the Held bring- 
 eth forth year by year. 
 
 23 And thou shalt oat before the Lord tliy (Jod, in tlie place which ho 
 shall choose to place his name there, the tithe of thy corn, of thy wine, antl 
 of thine oil, and the tirstlings of thy herds and of thy Hocks ; that thou 
 mayest learn to fear the Lord thy God always. 
 
 24 And if the way be too long for thee, so that thou art not able to carry 
 it ; or if the place be too far from thee, which the Lord thy (Jod shall choose 
 to sot his name there, when the Lord thy God hath blessed tliee : 
 
 25 Tlien shalt thou turn U into money, and bind up the money in thine 
 hand, and shalt ao unto the place which the Lord thy God shall cnoose : 
 
 26 And thou shalt bestow that money for whatsoever thy soul lusteth after, 
 for oxen, or for sheep, or for wine, or for strong drink, or for whatsoever thy 
 soul desireth: and thou shalt eat there before the Lord thy God, and thou 
 shalt rejoice, thou, and thine household. 
 
 There can be no mistake, — no quibbling or explaining away of 
 this passage of scripture. Its meaning i.s so direct and uncjualified, 
 that it may at once be fully grasped by the simplest intellect, and 
 there is no casuistically getting around it, in any way, by any 
 Christian man or woman. The agnostic Prohibitionists (and there 
 are numbers of them) who quarrel so constantly with the Bible, 
 because it does not support their temperance views, will, as a 
 matter of course, ignore its authority altogether. 
 
 But while God proclaimed no general statute of total abstinence 
 or prohibition, and permits the mwlerate or temperate use of wine 
 and other intoxicants, he fully recognizes the law of personal res- 
 ponsibility — of voluntary abstinence, either collectively or individ- 
 ually. In the sixth chapter of Numbers, beginning at the first 
 verse, God directed Moses to enact a special statute, covering the 
 case of a man or woman who shall make a certain vow — the vow of 
 a Nazar.ite — and who, during the period of separation, shall drink 
 neither wine nor strong drink, nor use the product of the vine in 
 any form.* Let the reader take up any good concordance of the 
 Old Testament, and examine it carefully under the several heads of 
 wine, corn and wine, oil and wine, etc., and he will be able to 
 realise, in the fullest sense, that all its wines of whatever quality, 
 strong or weak, light or dark, no matter by what distinguishing 
 name known, were fermented wines, and that no such article as 
 unfermented wine was known to the great masses of the Jewish 
 people. Both the Greeks and Romans resorted to expensive pro- 
 cesses, by burial in the ground and otherwise, to prevent the 
 fermentation of grape juice, and preserve it at the same time. But 
 not a single quotation can be found, in either the Old or New 
 Testaments, to show that the Jews resorted to any expedient of 
 
 * See also the case of Jonadab, the son of Rechab, in Jeremiah xxxv. This 
 chapter is made a great deal of by Prohibitionists. But it will be seen that 
 the sons of Jonadao are praised, not because they abstained from wine, but 
 because in doing so they obeyed their father's commands. 
 

 OP PROHIBITION. 33 
 
 this sort. Thoir scriptures held fortli wino as ono of tho greatest 
 earthly blessings, which Ood could bestow upon his creatures ; and 
 thoy thankfully reciuved his gift without cavil or (juestion. Dur- 
 ing their occupation of its soil, while still existing as a nation, 
 Palestine supplied, just as it does to-day, the very best wine- 
 producing grapes of every variety. Vineyards covered every sunny 
 mountain and hill slope, and tho wine press was everywhere in 
 operation. But, just as to-day, different kinds of wine — the strong 
 and the weak, the white, the claret colored and the blood red, the 
 product of separate favouring localities, were known by distinctive 
 names, but wine (yayin) was still the generic term for them all. 
 Wine of one kind or another was the common table drink of 
 all the Jewish people, from the king to the peasant, in the days of 
 their national prosperity, and when of too strong or heady a 
 variety, was usually mixed with water. The abuse, but not the 
 use, of wine or strong drink is alone denounced in the Old Testa- 
 ment, wliich teaches, from beginning to end, no enforced principle 
 of abstinence, no Prohibition doctrine ; and gives no authority to 
 any person, however exalted, to make himself or his habits a rule 
 for his neighbour as to what he shall eat or what he shall drink. 
 Let the reader reverently take up his Bible, study it for himself 
 calmly and without prejudice, and he cannot fail to come to the 
 manifest conclusion that the temperance it teaches is not Prohibi- 
 tion ; and that Prohibition, as it is now understood, formed no 
 part of the counsel of God, as delivered to his servant Moses and to 
 the other ministers of his will, during the Old Testament period, as 
 regards the moral and religious government of mankind ; and that 
 those who maintain the contrary, maintain what has no real foun- 
 dation in fact. ' 
 
 PROHIBITION AND THE NEW TESTAMENT. 
 
 It would be foreign to the purpose of a necessarily brief sketch, 
 such as this pamphlet is, of the various subjects under consideration, 
 to enter upon any lengthy discussion as to the character of the wines 
 of the New Testament, or of the false or illogical deductions 
 foisted upon the public in regard to them by Prohibitionist writers. 
 We would merely say here, that as the Hebrew word yayin is the 
 generic term used for wine in the Old Testament, so also is the 
 Greek word oino8 the generic term for wine in the New Testa- 
 ment, and corresponds with the Latin vinum. it we stand upon 
 much simpler ground as regards the latter book. In the Old 
 Testament wine, as we have already seen, is called by different 
 names, but in the New Testament, out of thirty-eight places in 
 
84 OENEHAL REVIEW 
 
 which tfc iH alluded to, it \n tormod oinott in thirty-sovon, ftnd in tho 
 one othor caH<i ij/ucoufi, or Hwo<!t win«, in tho word uh«mI. lloinor, 
 whoii hfl HpealcH of wino (and he always alludcH to it as i\w fer- 
 nifintml artiol(i) invariably uhch the woni oinon, as do all tho othor 
 Orook clasHical writerH. Ft is plain, tlmroforo, that if vinon may 
 b« said to bo tho only word usod to donoto wino in tho Now Tosta- 
 mont, that thoro could bo only ono kind of wino alluded to. It 
 must bo altogether tho fcrniontcd artiolo or tlm unfcnnentod ; and 
 it must bo always roinoinbor<Hl that the juico of tho grape does not 
 become wine at all until aftc^r fermentation develops its alcoholic 
 properties. A boiled syrup made from raiBins or grape juice, 
 and destitute of alcohol, is not wine. But, as in tho case of tho 
 Old Testament, tho best way to loarn the true character of tho 
 wineg of the New Testament is from its own pages. Lot us now 
 for a brief space enquire into what they teaeh. 
 
 Tn the fulness of time God, in his wonderful mercy and love 
 towards sinful men, sent his own beloved son to bo manifest in tho 
 flesh, to live for us, to dio for us, to render in his own person full 
 satisfaction for the sins of the whole world, and then to sit down 
 forever at the right hand of tho Father, there to make, as our 
 great High Priest, perpetual intercession for his people. Mani 
 tested first to tho shepherds of Rothlehem, then, after the lapse of 
 twelve years, to the doctors of tho Temple, if they only had eyes 
 to see Him. He next is seen as the obscure and humblo worker 
 at the carpenter's bench, but still growing in stature and in favour 
 with God and man. At length he reached, unnoticed by tho world 
 at large, the full period of ripened manhood, when it became 
 necessary that his ministry should be publicly ami miraculously 
 announced. There was a we(' ling in Oana" (Jf Galilee, and as was 
 then the custom among well-to-do people in oriental countries, ami 
 is still the custom there, the relatives and friends of the bride and 
 groom, from far and near, were all bidden to the marriage. And 
 we are told that Jesus and his mother, and his disciples, were also 
 among the invited guests, who filled the spacious mansion to 
 overflowing, and presently the marriage feast began. There was a 
 ruler of the feast who saw that the guests were made as comfort- 
 able as possible, and had their wants, as regards food and drink, 
 fully supplied. He had numerous servants under him, who waited 
 on the guests. These marriage feasts among the ancient Jews 
 sometimes lasted for several days, and probably owing to the 
 number of persons at the Cana wedding, the supply of wine after 
 a time gave out. The situation which ensued may be best 
 described by the following quotation from Canon Farrar's Life of 
 Christ :— 
 
 " Whether the marriage festival lasted for seven days, as was usual among 
 those who could afford it, or only for one or two, as was the case among the 
 poorer classes, we cannot tell ; but at some period of the entertainment the 
 wine suddenly ran short. None but those who know how sacred in the East 
 ia the duty of lavish hospitality, and how passionately the obligation to 
 exercise it to the utmost is felt, can realize the gloom which this incident 
 
OP PHOHIBITION. SH 
 
 would liavo thrown over the occaiiion, or the niinory ami mortitlcation which 
 it would h»vo caiiHud to the woddxd pair. Thoy would hivo felt it to ho, an 
 ill thu Kut it would atill Im felt to hu, n hittor aud iadeliblu diiigraou." 
 
 The Mother of Josub wjih, inoHt probiihly, a iiour relative of the 
 family of the bride, and had accordingly conHiderahlo authority in 
 the household. Shn was therefore very naturally concerned al)OUt 
 the crisiH which had arisen in the feHtivities, and mentioned the 
 matter to her Divine Son, in the inspired hope, no doubt, that he 
 would remove the dif!iculty by Home notable manifestation of Iuh 
 power. And ho she told the servants, " Whatsoever he saith 
 unto you do it." And there were there, says the sacred narrative,* 
 six water pots of stone containing two or tliree firkins apiece. 
 These pots, by the direction of Jesus, were filled to the brim, so 
 that nothing could be added to detract from his miracle. (Jood 
 wine, such as was usually made from the pure juice of the grape 
 by the Jews, was the immediate result. " And Jesus thus mani- 
 fested his glory," continues the gospel narrative, " and his disciples 
 believed on him." The quantity of wine produced by this miracle 
 is variously estimated by commentators, owing to doubts as to 
 the size of the firkin. Barnes says it means the Hebrew bath, 
 containing about seven and a half gallons. This would give at 
 least fifteen gallons to each water pot, or ninety gallons 
 altogether ; a quantity which shows what a large number 
 of persons were at the feast. All commentators of 
 repute agree that the oinoa, or wine, of the miracle was the fer- 
 mented article, in common use among the Jewish people of that 
 period, but of a better quality than usual. You have kept the 
 good wine until now said the ruler of the feast. Let it be supposed 
 that the plebiscite of the Laurier Cabinet has a majority in its 
 favour, that Prohibition becomes the law of the land, one result 
 would be that if Christ were to perform that miracle again, he must 
 necessarily be prosecuted for the commission of a crime. If Christ 
 did right, Prohibition is wrong. If Prohibition is right, then 
 Christ did wrong. Which horn of the dilemma will Christian 
 Prohibitionists, who declare that they believe in the Bible as con- 
 taining the whole counsel of God for the moral and religious 
 government of mankind, elect to swing on ? How true it is that 
 history is constantly repeating itself. When the founder of 
 Christianity came upon earth, drinking to excess was a prevalent 
 sin then just as it is now, yet we never hear of Him preaching 
 Prohibition. He found the clergymen of those days teaching for 
 doctrine the commandments of men, precisely as they are doing 
 to-day. If there is anything in the Bible condemning the moderate 
 use of wine and other intoxicants, by all means let our modern 
 Pharisees give us the chapter and verse. If, however, they are 
 unable to do so, they must admit that, so far as the Bible is con- 
 cerned, the facts are wholly against them. It would require a vast 
 
 * See the (ioapel of St. John ii. 6, 
 
36 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 amount of evidence to discredit the miracle of Cana of Galilee. 
 
 All the gospel records very plainly show, that when our Saviour 
 at any time alluded to the product of the grape he meant the ordi- 
 nary fermented wine of the country. "John the Baptist," said he 
 to the Pharisees, "came neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and 
 ye say he hath a devil ; the Son of Man is come eating and drinking, 
 and ye say behold a gluttonous man and a wine-bibber, a friend of 
 publicans and sinners." (Luke vii. 33, 34, 35.) If the wine was not 
 fermented there could be no more cause for the censorious language 
 of the Pharisees, than in the case of water. In all the great wine- 
 making countries of ancient times, the wine bottles were made of 
 leather, and were frequently of large size, and similar to what 
 oriental water carriers use to-day. When these wine bottles, or 
 rather wine skins, were new they expanded as the liquor ferment- 
 ed, but old bottles having become dry and hard, like an old shoe, 
 had lost their property of expansion, and consequently burst. 
 Accordingly in Matthew ix. 17 the revised version reads, " Neither 
 do men put new wine into old wine-skins, else the skins burst, and 
 the wine is spilled and the skins perish ; but they put new wine 
 into fresh wine-skins, and bo.;h are preserved." See also Mark ii. 
 22 in the same version, and L';ke v. 37, 38. In verse 39 of the latter 
 chapter we find, " And no man having drunk old wine desireth 
 new, for he saith the old is good," or better, as the marginal note 
 says many authorities give it. The more we examine the gospels, 
 the more certainly does the conclusion force itself upon our minds, 
 that the wine alluded to by Christ was invariably the fermented 
 article. And there cannot, therefore, be the slightest doubt that 
 the omoj* used at the liLs*-, supper, and by Christ's command to be 
 drank forever in hi ' 'nembrance, was fermented wine, such as 
 was required for the Temple sacrifices, and sold in the wine shops 
 of Jerusalem — the fruit of the wine which he was to drink no 
 more with them until he drank it new in his Father's kingdom. 
 (Matthew xxvi. 29.) The character of new wine, the Hebrew 
 tirosh, may be further learned from Acts ii. 13 and succeeding 
 verses, where Luke states that the apostles were accused of being 
 filled with new wine, and that Peter commenced the defence of 
 himself and his brethren, by declaring that they were not drunken, 
 seeing it was but the third hour of the day (9 a.m.) In Ephesians 
 V, 18 Paul charges the Christians of Ephesus not to be drunk with 
 wine, wherein is excess, but be filled with the spirit. In Timothy 
 iii. 8 Paul commands that the deacons must be grave, not given to 
 much wine. In v. 23 he tells Timothy to be no longer a drinker 
 of water, but to use a little wine for his stomach's sake and his 
 often infirmities. In all these quotations fermented wine is alone 
 alluded to, and in the Greek text is designated by the single word 
 oinos. 
 
 But the strongest testimony, as to the true character of the 
 wines of the New Testament, will be found in the First Epistle of 
 St. Paul to the Corinthians, eleventh chapter, twentieth and 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 37 
 
 following verses. There Paul strongly rebukes the members of the 
 church at Corinth for the improper manner in which they partook 
 of the Lord's Supper, and especially for getting drunk thereat. 
 But while doing so he never tells them, that in the future they 
 must not use fermented wine at this Supper, but, on the contrary, 
 the unfermented and non-intoxicating wine, or a syrup made irom 
 dried grapes instead. He gave no command whatever upon this 
 point, evidently for either one of two i*easons, to wit, because a 
 non-intoxicating wine was not in ordinary use, or because the 
 fermented wine was that which was used at the Last Supper. The 
 Corinthians were to continue to use the same wine precisely that 
 our Lord gave to his disciples at that memorable Supper, the most 
 solemn and impressive of all his acts. And from that day forward 
 until a few years ago, when the Prohibition wine heresy set in, all 
 orthodox Christian people, have used, and should still continue to 
 use, fermented wine whenever the communion is administered in its 
 double form, as instituted by Christ. It is perfectly plain, when 
 all these facts are fully and fairly considered, that there can be no 
 valid administration of the Lord's Supper when the bread and 
 wine which he commanded to be used are not used. Little wonder 
 that the Protestant Archbishop of Rupert's Land (Machray) 
 stated at the synod of that diocese held in Winnipeg last May 
 (1897), that he would vote against Prohibition, and that a motion 
 favouring that measure was lost by a vote of 40 to 10. The 
 Church of England, which occupies the foremost place in the Pro- 
 testant world, as regards influence and profound scholarship, 
 stands firmly by the use of fermented wine at the communion 
 table, just as the Presbyterians of Great Britain do, and as all 
 Protestant churches, which claim to be orthodox Christian, should 
 do. The truth is that Prohibitionists, whether in the pulpit or 
 out of it, directly ignore the Bible and its plainest teaching on the 
 Temperance question, and are fast drifting into practical heresy, 
 and playing into the hands of infidelity. As we have clearly 
 shown neither the Old nor the New Testament prohibits the moder- 
 ate use of fermented liquor of any kind, and those who state the 
 contrary state what is untrue. Christ and his apostles form the 
 great exemplar group of the Christian world, and their teaching 
 constitutes for that world the whole counsel of God both as to 
 faith and morals. They sought to regenerate mankind by moral 
 suasion and religious teaching, and never taught that the arm of 
 [the law should be used to compel their fellow-men to think or to 
 relieve as they did. " Let no man therefore judge you in meat or 
 in drink," said the apostle Paul (Colossians ii. 16). That is what 
 Prohibitionists are seeking to do when they go to our Parliament 
 to ask for legal enactments, to compel all the people of Canada to 
 do as they do — to enable them to put their yoke upon our necks, 
 and force us to bow to the Prohibition idol which they have set up 
 — to practically cease to be a free people. Having heretically set 
 the command of the Pounder of Christianity, as regards his Last 
 
38 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 Supper, at defianco, they would, if possible, compel Anglicans and 
 other Protestants, who still hold fast to the orthodox mode • of 
 communion, to do as they do ; and would no doubt, if they had the 
 power, refuse to permit the use of true wine even for sacramental 
 purposes, and compel the use of the fraudulent article instead.* 
 The great logical difficulty of Prohibitionists very plainly presents 
 itself at this point of our argument. If Christ used fermented 
 wine at his meals, and so placed himself in a position to be des- 
 scribed by the Pharisaical Prohibitionists of t^ose days as a wine- 
 bibber, if he graciously and miraculously made good wine for the 
 use of the numerous guests at the wedding of Cana in Galilee, if 
 he used true wine at his memorable Last Supper — just the same 
 wine that the Corinthian church used, on what moral or religious 
 grounds can its lawful and temperate use be now forbidden to the 
 whole, or to any portion, of the Canadian people ? Prohibitionists, 
 clerical and lay, now vainly seek to escape from this logical diffi- 
 culty by a resort to palpable deception — by falsely endeavouring 
 to make it appear that Bible wines were of two kinds, fermented 
 and non-fermented ; that while the use of the former was denoun- 
 ced and forbidden, the use of the latter was permitted ; and that 
 our Saviour, his apostles and the early Christian churches, only 
 used non-fermented wines. 
 
 • The red colour, aymbolical of Christ's blood in the Eucharist, cannot be 
 imparted to wine without fermentation. 
 
 Some of the methods of preparing the so-called " unfermented wines " 
 might here be noted. In the majority of instances poor, thin clarets are sub- 
 jected to distillation to get rid of the alcohol, sugar is added to sweeten and 
 thicken, and elderberry to restore the colour partially destroyed by boiling. 
 In others, the juice is boiled with sugar to a sj^rup, and mUcylic acid added 
 to prevent fermentation. In not a few instances which fell under the 
 writer's own observation, cider, sweetened and coloured, has been sold under 
 the name of unfermented wine, and these samples contained a notable quan- 
 tity of alcohol. These instances will give a fair idea of the sophisticated 
 abominations that are sought to be forced upon the public under the cloak of 
 religion and philanthropy. Quite recently a feminine lecturer declared that 
 the time would come when " fermented " v/ine, " that last relic of barbarism 
 and immorality, would be swept out of the churches." And the writer is 
 credibly informed that a reverend gentleman also hoped that the time would 
 come when it would be a "criminal offence " to use fermented wines in the 
 Sacrament. Nor is this language any more extravagant than consistency 
 requires. Just so long as it is deemed necessary to use wine for the proper 
 commemoration of the Saviour's death, — and that will be while reason and 
 Bible language lasts, — so long will it be impossible to get public opinion to 
 regard moderate drinking as a sin /^erse.— Temperance versus Prohibition, 
 page 35. 
 
 
CHAPTER IV. 
 
 SOME OP THE PROTESTANT CHURCHES AND PROHIBITION. 
 
 b- 
 
 lul 
 
 Id 
 
 he 
 .er 
 .li- 
 ed 
 of 
 at 
 ita. 
 
 is 
 lUl 
 ihe 
 icy 
 per 
 md 
 
 to 
 on, 
 
 T is a remarkable fact, in ecclesiastical history, that all the 
 
 heresies and schisms of any great importance, which have 
 
 Afflicted Christianity, from the days of the apostles down to the 
 
 n-esont time, must be laid at the door of the clerical order. That 
 
 [rder is chiefly responsible for all the metaphysical hair-splittings 
 
 -all the fine logical subtleties which have disturbed the Christian 
 
 I'orld from time to time, and have so frequently set the more prac 
 
 ical but less abstruse laity by the ears. An impartial historian, 
 
 ashington Irving, tells us in his Life of Mahomet, that when 
 
 liat great Prohibitionist, and notable imposter, first appeared 
 
 jrominently on the world's stage, the Eastern churches were so 
 
 istracted by heresies and schisms— so puzzled by the subtle 
 
 jstractions, to which the Oriental intellect has always been so 
 
 rone, of one theologian after another, the simple Christianity 
 
 jiught by the apostles and their immediate successors, had almost 
 
 Eased to exist ; and had been supplanted, as regards Asia and 
 
 Lfrica at least, by gross error and superstition. And so down 
 
 ion these heretics and schismatics came Mahomet and his 
 
 [ccessors to literally sweep the.n from the face of the earth. With 
 
 le destruction of the Roman Empire, East and West, which 
 
 tbbon so eloquently tells us about, came that dark mediaeval 
 
 Iriod which so long oppressed the world, until at length the dis- 
 
 Ivery of the art of printing became the dawn of a new renaiss- 
 
 ice, which gradually ripened into the mental triumphs of modern 
 
 les. But with the return of a higher intellectual condition 
 
 irae also back disquisitions of all kinds, metaphysical hair- 
 
 ittings, and ologies of every description. The day of doubt and 
 
 cussion is again upon us, in which history is repeating itself, 
 
 d presenting us with new types of the Sadducee, the Pharisee 
 
 tlie Epicurean ; and when philosophy is propounded by a 
 
 )dern school of carping agnostics, who agree upon nothing and 
 
 jagree almost upon everything, and who essay to revive the 
 
40 
 
 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 nature religion of the Greeks and Romans, or something akin to 
 it. A day, too, when skilful sophists, like Goldwin Hmitli, who 
 without being either very original or very profound, have acquired 
 a peculiar faculty of assimilation — of clothing other people's ideas 
 in their own language, and presenting them in new forms. 
 Ignoring what the Bible has done for mankind, what Christianity 
 has done and is still doing for the betterment of the world, these 
 men of second-hand ideals would destroy both if it were in their 
 power to do so, and reduce us to their own pitiable condition, and 
 to their wretched belief that our existence, like that of the brute 
 beasts that perish, terminates with this life. Even if Christianity 
 were the mere baseless fable that the modern agnostic endeavours 
 to prove it to be, yet so long as it makes the world brighter and 
 better, and people live and die more happily, what enemies to the 
 human race must those persons be who seek to disturb with 
 malice prepense, or in mere evil wantonness, a sound and wholesome j 
 condition of things for which they have no substitute to oifer.* If 
 
 * "You have destroyed," said David Hume's mother, who had once been 
 a pious Presbyterian, to her son shortly before her death, ' ' all my faith in a j 
 blessed hereafter. Oh give me something now instead to comfort me on my 
 death-bed." With all his philosophy, and all his profound knowledge, the 
 great sceptic and historian, who is said to have been much distressed, had 
 nothing to give to his dying mother, to replace the hope he had deprived her I 
 of. 
 
 Henry Ward Beecher, while still in his best days, and before the Tilton 
 scandal had wrought him so much woe, was on one occasion invited to meet i 
 the infidel Robert IngersoU in debate. The large hall, where the meeting 
 was held, was filled to overflowing by the audience. 'OlngersoU spoke long 
 and eloquently in support of his peculiar views, but in more guarded 
 language than was usual with him. When he had finished all eyes were f 
 turned upon the great pulpit orator. Beecher slowly arose, drew himself up 
 to his full stature, and then quietly told the audience that a circumstance 
 had occurred, as he came up Broadway (New York) just before the meeting, 
 which had so disturbed him that he was not in a condition to make any very 
 lengthy reply. A poor lame man, he said, who supported himself with 
 crutches, was endeavouring to cross the crowded street just below City Hall 
 Park, when presently a great burly fellow suddenly ran against him, threw 
 him down, and without offering to assist him, disappeared among the 
 dense surrounding crowd. ' ' What an inhuman scoundrel, " exclaimed IngersoU 
 in a voice so audible as to be heard throughout the hall. Beecher turned j 
 upon him instantly. Mr. IngersoU, said he, in tones that filled the hall, 
 that man whom you term an inhuman scoundrel, did nothing worse than I 
 you have been doing here to-night. You have said and done everything in] 
 your power to dash the crutches of religious faith from the hands of the! 
 struggling Christian man and woman — to strike them to the earth, and leave! 
 them there, without extending a helping hand, utterly bereft of all hope." 
 The effect upon the audience was almost electrical in its force. IngersoU at 
 once felt his utter defeat, and presently took up his hat, and left the hall| 
 without saying a word. 
 
 Goldwin Smith, who, in vulgar phrase, has a peculiar and very foolisl 
 habit of running his head against stone walls, occupied himself during thel 
 earlier part of the present decade in writing a book called " Canada and th€| 
 Canadian Question. " It had for its main object to prove to the Canadian 
 people that their true policy was to disloyally sever their connection with 
 the Smother Country, and to cast in their fortunes with the United States.! 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 41 
 
 Christianity, teaching as it does, our future accountability for our 
 personal conduct in the present state, conduces to a higher moral as 
 well as religious life, and smooths the death-beds of many millions 
 of worthy people, how needlessly cruel is the ruthless hand that, 
 without any good object in view, would destroy our belief in the 
 immortality of the soul, and the hope of a blessed resurrection and 
 a happy hereafter. " If in this life only," said the Apostle Paul, 
 " we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. Let 
 us eat and drink for to-morrow we die." (I Corinthians xv. 19, 32.) 
 But the Bible and Christianity will as certainly survive the 
 assaults of the present schools of atheistical and theistical philoso- 
 phies, just as certainly as it survived the attacks of Voltaire, of 
 Gibbon, of Hume, and the host of lesser lights who became their 
 disciples. In Paul's day the simple yet most beautiful gospel of 
 Christ, was to the profound Greek philosopher the merest foolish- 
 
 This book was a very clever and elegantly written piece of special pleading, 
 but showed a very s'ender acquaintance with the true political idiosyncrasy 
 of the Canadian people. It wholly failed to accomplish its object, and is 
 now almost forgotten. At no former period of their history were the people 
 of this country more strongly attached to the British Empire, and more 
 determined to remain part and parcel of it, than they are now. Unsuccess- 
 ful in his persistent efforts to do a political mischief to the people among 
 whom he lives, Goldwin Smith now essays to do them a new injury, by a 
 fresh display of his want of common sense, in running his head against 
 another stone wall— the Pible and Christianity. It requires no very great 
 extent of prophetic vision to predict that both will continue to exist, and 
 just as our grand Dominion will continue to exist, when Goldwin Smith is 
 dead and gone, and all his works and idle egotisms have been buried forever 
 in the same Lethean tomb where so many of them already lie forgotten. 
 The gratification of his curiosity — the curiosity of over three score and ten — 
 to which he alludes in his recent most mischievous work, "Guesses at the 
 Riddle of Existence," is a poor excuse for seeking to injure his fellow-man, 
 by destroying his hope in a future state, and making him unhappy in this 
 world. There is certainly very little philanthropy in his composition. 
 
 The cacoethes scribtndi is evidently an irresistible disease with Goldwin 
 Smith, and must be gratified in some way, if not for good then for evil. 
 When there is no opportunity for perpetrating any other mischief, he usually 
 insults the loyalty, to their Queen and country, of the Canadian people. 
 His latest escapade in this direction, was a letter to the New York Evening 
 Post, under date of August 14th, 1897, in which he uses the following offen- 
 sive language : — 
 
 " How often has the action of the great forces, sure in the end to prevail, 
 been suspended by that of the secondary forces or by adverse accident ! 
 How often did the unification of Italy and that of Germany miscarry though 
 certainly destined at last to arrive ! Protectionism will run its course. The 
 J ubilee fever will abate. The time will come when American statesmen, 
 now so indifferent to this question, will see that if it was worth while to 
 spend all that blood and money in averting the establishment of an antago- 
 nistic power to your south, it is not less worth whi'e to bestow political 
 eff'ort in averting the establishment of an antagonistic power to your north. 
 
 " British statesmen, on the other hand, will learn the hopelessness of their 
 attempt to keep 5,000,000 of North Americans out of North America and 
 attach them to Europe. The day will come, though men of my age are not 
 likely to behold it. Already in spite of all the wrangling among tne politic- 
 ians, the two sections of our race on this continent are rapidly lucing. 
 Hardly anything now divides them but the political and fiscal line. 
 
42 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 ness, and U) the Pharisaical Jew a stumbling block. It is just tho 
 same now ! Rut, at the same time, how gratifying it is for the 
 Christian man or woman to be able to realise, in its fullest sense, 
 that however the athiest or theist may sneer at that gospel as being 
 beneath his philosophy, its sympathetic story. Divine and human, 
 will still contiime to pour its blessed sunshine into millions of 
 gentle and loving hearts, that the i-eign of the cross will still 
 remain supreme, arid that the greatest book the world has ever 
 known, and through which for countless ages men have heard the 
 voice of God proclaiuiing the eternal distinctions of right and 
 wrong, will still hold its place as the most valued treasure of 
 mankind, l^werything in nature, as well as in science, points 
 clearly to a beginning, and if there was a beginning there must be 
 some pre-existent power to cause that beginning. It could not 
 produce itself. There was nothing in existence before the begin- 
 ning, and nothing produces nothing. Herbert Spencer, after many 
 years of patient research into the abstruser sciences, with a view 
 to discredit the Bible and Christianity, finishes in doubt just as he 
 began, and winds up tiie last volume of his last work witli the, to 
 him, humiliating admission : — 
 
 " But one trutli must grow ever clearer — the truth that there is an Inscru- 
 table Existence everywhere uianii'ested. to which he can neither iinil nor 
 conceive either beginning or end. Amid the mysteries, which become more 
 mysterious the more they are thought about, there will lemain the one 
 absolute certainty that he is in the presence of an Infinite and Eternal 
 Eueigy, from which all things proceed " 
 
 Even Goldwin Smith, the latest assailant of Christianity, who 
 has sadly fallen from grace in his old age, and now seeks to dis- 
 credit what he recently believed in, admits that there is a God 
 who created this world, but who takes no interest in its affairs.* 
 How illogically absurd is the idea, that the Supreme Being who 
 formed this beautiful world out of chaos, with all its sunshine and 
 happiness, and placed everything thereon and therein to sustain 
 and benefit mankind, and made man the physical and intellectual 
 lord of his creation, would leave that man, for wh'r » he had 
 already done so much, without any chart to guide hi i way, or any 
 rules of conduct to govern his life. A position of this kind is 
 opposed to every law of reason and common sense, and every form 
 of fact ; and carries its own best refutation on its face. And, 
 thus, we naturally and logically come to the Bible, the book of all 
 books, which despite all its alleged human error and fallibility, 
 either as regards transcription or otherwise, still contains the 
 whole law of a beneficent Creator for the better government and 
 happiness of his creature — man.f 
 
 * Guesses at the Eiddle of Existence, page 223. 
 
 t The man who has no hope as regards auother life, and has no belief in a 
 future state of reward and punishment, has no restraint beyond the policemjin 
 and the law. From this class comes tlie anarchist of the present day, with 
 his belief ia a miBaioa to murder whea he sees fit. France's infidolity is 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 
 
 43 
 
 But f-he mischief done to the Bible and Christianity by their 
 open foes, is nob infrequently small in comparison to that which 
 they suffer at the hands of their supposed friends. As in primitive 
 times, the greatest injury to the welfare of mo<lern Christian 
 churches is now frequently inHicted by their own teacliers. 
 Clerical doubters everywhere abound, who have become converts to 
 a new school of Biblical exegesis, which places the uncertain teach- 
 ings of geology, and other modern ologies, in the front rank,* and 
 seek to meet adverse criticism by admitting a good deal of tiie case 
 it makes out. According to these doubters, the accounts of tlie 
 creation, the fall of man, the flood, and so forth, are mere alle- 
 gories, or a soi't of Biblical Esop's fables, but embodying some moral 
 or religious truth ; and they do not hesitate to use their pulpits to 
 impress their views upon their congregations. Dr. Lyman Abbott, 
 
 costing her heavily in tiie gross sensuality of her peop'e, and the decline of 
 liur population. To show the rottenness of its irreligious social life we 
 append the following paragraph clipped from a press despatch of May 'Jth, 
 1897 :— 
 
 There has been a veritable epidemic of suicide in Paris for some weeks 
 pa.st, the recent tropical heat adding to the number of cases. The tragediei 
 commenced with the self-de«truction on July 7th last, of four young dres> 
 makers in the Poissonniere (quarters of Paris, who suffocated themselves in a 
 small room with the fumes of a charcoal stove after dining together. 
 
 Since then, almost daily, one or more women have committed suicide, and 
 the self-murder of men has been equally numerous. The bodies of men were 
 found daily hanging to trees in the J^ois de Vincenues. 
 
 In an alley of that part alone six bodies of suicides were found during the 
 past" week, and the Morgue is so full of dead bodies found in the Kiver Seine 
 that there is no further room for them. 
 
 * To plain, sensible people, who are in tiie habit of testing theories of every 
 kind by the standard of reason and common sense, the wild guesses at times 
 of geologists, and archivologists, and other ologists, nearly half crazed by their 
 special studies, have almost come to be a matter of amusement. While many 
 scientists admit the beginning of all things by the hand of a great first cause, 
 they deny the necessarily miraculous power of that first cause. Having 
 prepared everything in his own way and according to his own will for the 
 final consummation, the great First Cause could li^ve finished the creation in 
 fix days as well as in a thousand years. Sir William Dawson has recently 
 well said : — 
 
 " I rejoice, however, in the confident belief th.at with God's blessing it 
 may be large, enthusiastic and useful in the highest sense. I rejoice also in 
 the belief that present indications warrant the hope that the clouds of an 
 agnostic and merely mechanical view of the universe, which have for some 
 time obscured the fair field of natural science are beginning to be dissipated, 
 and that Christian students of nature will be able more fully to show that 
 the history of the earth is that of the development, in many ways ami by 
 many subordinate agencies of His own appointment, of the plans of the 
 Almighty Creator, our own Heavenly Father, and Redeemer, and to bear an 
 ever increasing testimony to their own experience of divine love, as well as 
 to the congruity of belief in God with the earnest and successful pursuit of 
 science, and especially with broail and enlightened views of the system of the 
 universe, and of our own relations to it and to its Maker. 
 
 " I shall earnestly pray that the spirit of God may guide all who take 
 part in the meeting, so that the Divine blessing may fully rest upon its 
 exercises." 
 
44 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 for example, who now tills the pulpib of Plymouth Church, in 
 Brooklyn, where Henry Ward Ijeecher, a few years ago, preached 
 to delighted crowds of hearers, amused the greatly diminished con- 
 gregation, in the earlier part of 1897, by openly ridiculing, so as to 
 create even laughter among his hearers, the story of Jonah and the 
 whale, and to tvhich our Saviour alludes. (Matthew xii. 40.) In 
 any case Dr. Abbott's irreverence should have been restrained by 
 the reflection that the Book of Jonah, whether it be allegorical or 
 otherwise, teaches the lesson of implicit obedience to the commands 
 of God, who is perfectly able to enforce that obedience by a 
 miracle if he sees tit to«do so. The Rev. Dr. Buckley, one of the 
 foremost theologians of the Methodist church in the United States, 
 has also succumbed to the Higher Criticism and the new school of 
 scriptural exegesis, and has recently been calling attention to 
 human errors in the Bible, and denying its inspiration. The Rev. 
 S. J. Harben, another Methodist minister, at a recent clerical 
 meeting in New York, where this matter informally came tip for 
 discussion, maintained that Dr. Buckley's position is the true one ; 
 and this statement was not seriously questioned by any of his 
 brethren who were there at the time.* 
 
 While the doubting malady has badly attacked the Methodist 
 churches in the United States, both north and south, Canadian 
 Methodism has by no means escaped the disease.! The Rev. Dr. 
 Workman, recently a professor in Victoria University, Toronto, 
 the principal Methodist educational institution of the Dominion, 
 had to be removed from his position for his heterodox opinions. 
 During the present year (1897) this reverend gentleman has 
 undertaken, in a little book, entitled "The Old Testament Vindi- 
 cated," to reply to Goldwin Smith's attacks on the credibility of 
 that part of the Bible. He asserts, in substance, that these attacks 
 are based on premises which have now no existence in fact, as the 
 plenary inspiration of the Old Testament is not endorsed by 
 Christian scholars of the present day. Let us listen to him for a 
 brief space on this point : — 
 
 " Professor Smith is too profoiiuJ a stutleat, general as well as special, not 
 to know that the account of tlie Fall in Genesis, which was once explained 
 by theologians as literal history, is now explained by Christian scholars as 
 religious allegory — an allegory, like a parable, being a form of narrative 
 employed by the sacred writers to illustrate and inculcate spiritual truth. 
 ."The second and third ch-iptera of the book were constructed out of 
 traditional materials which are not only of Babylonian origin, but are also 
 stamped with a Babylonian impress, as Professor Sayce, the eminent archae- 
 ologist, has shown. Hence, in primitive timos, no doubt, some features of 
 the story were regarded as literal fact« which, at the present time, are not 
 80 regarded ; but the structure of the nvrrative indicates that the inspired 
 writer purposely clothed his descripticm of the Garden, as well as his account 
 of the Fall, in somewhat symbolic langua^d." + 
 
 * Vide New York Christian Advocate during February, 1897. 
 
 tD. D.'s are remarkably plentiful among Methodist Canadian ministers 
 now-a-days. 
 
 :^ The Old Testament Vindicated, page 24. 
 
OF PHOHIBITION. 
 
 45 
 
 From the foregoing extract it will be seen that Professor Work- 
 man virtually admits the accuracy of a good deal of Professor 
 Smith's adverse criticism, and seeks to evade its force by giving 
 up, as lawyers would say, a large part of his case, and taking 
 refuge in the allegorical method of Old Testament exegesis.* 
 He might be excusable were he content himself by seeking to 
 harmonise the six days of the creation with vast geological periods, 
 but when he coolly tells us that the second and third chapters of 
 Genesis were constructed out of Babylonian traditions, he states 
 something which neither he nor any other person can prove. The 
 descendents of Noah, who settled in that part of Asia, gradually 
 sank into polytheism, and abandoned the worship of the one true 
 God ; and their records are, accordingly, of a very uncertain char- 
 acter, and quite different from the clear and definite Biblical 
 narrative, which they can only bo regarded as corroborating and 
 not as originating. Noah, as we have stated elsewhere, was a 
 man of ability and wide information, and must therefore have 
 been familiar with the leading facts of antediluvian history and 
 chronology, and transmitted the knowledge which he possessed to 
 his children. It is in that direction we should look for the 
 basis of Babylonian tradition, which evidently was merely a 
 corruption of the true story in Genesis. The simple straight- 
 forward trutii rests with the Bible narrative, the mysticism and 
 the legend with the Babylonian fragmentary remains that have 
 been unearthed by archieologists in- recent years.f Not every 
 person now-a-days will maintain that all the books of the Old 
 Testament were inspired. St. Paul does not say so. The revised 
 version very clearly expresses his true meaning, when he tells 
 Timothy (II Timothy iii. 16) : " Every scripture inspired of (iod 
 is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for 
 instruction, which is in righteousness." Thus showing that there 
 were scriptures which were not inspired. But we must agree with 
 Dean Farrar, that the inspired portions of the Bible contain the 
 whole counsel of God as regards faith and morals, and the full 
 salvation of mankind. It is not necessary to criticise at any 
 length Dr. Workman's allegorical methods of Old Testament 
 
 * The allegorical method as applied to Old Testament exegesis was first 
 founded by the eminent Jewish philosopher, Philo. who was contemporary 
 with Christ. Although unacquainted with Hebrew, Philo. who was a native 
 of Alexandria, was a tine Greek scholar ; and in order to meet the arguments 
 of heathen philosophers, and Plato among the rest, who objected to certain 
 parts of the Old Testament (just as Goldwin Smith does to-day) adopted the 
 allegorical method of explanation, which Greek philosophy had already 
 applied to the mythological legends of its own nature religion. While Pro- 
 fessor Smith's plagiaristic ideas are nearly two thousand years old, Professor 
 Workman essays to answer him in the manner of Philo Judeeus almost 
 equally aa ancient. 
 
 t At no period in the annals of mankind was the knowledge of the one 
 true God ever obliterated. Thus in Genesis Xiv. 28 we read of Melchizedek 
 King of Salem, priest of God Most High. 
 
 I 
 
46 GENERAL IIKVTEVV 
 
 oxoj^esi.s, but in onlor to show how untcuiihlo aad ovoii heterodox 
 thoy are, we would refer our readiM-s to the fourth chapter of Dean 
 Farrar's recent work, " The Bible, its Meaning and Supremacy." 
 \V») may statn, however, that Prof. Workman's position is endorsed 
 by some of the l)urning and shining lights of the Canadian Metho- 
 dist church. In the first place his book, "The Old Testament 
 Vin<licated," is given to the public by tlnj lliiv. \Vm. liriggs, the 
 (lenerid Conference manager of the " Methodist Book Publishing 
 House," at Toronto, which has become, of late years, a great trail- 
 ing and mercantile concern, and dabbles in everything, in the book 
 and stationery line, frt)in a needle to an anclujr, after, as some 
 people might aver, a very worldly fashion. Wo cannot say whether 
 tmr reverend book and stationery brotlujr endorses the very heter- 
 odox ideas of Pr()fessor Workman, l)ut he has evidently no objec- 
 tion to make a little money out of them for tiie benoKt of the 
 church — to do evil that good may come.* How history does repeat 
 itstdf I There can be little doubt that the money changers of the 
 Temple contributed a share of their profits into the same treasury 
 where the poor widow cast in her mite. But there can be no 
 manner of doubt that Nathaniel Burwa.sh, 8. T. 1)., L. L .D., the 
 (Chancellor of Victoria University, has written a preface to Pro- 
 fessor Workman's book, in which he fully endorses all his {)i'oposi- 
 tions. The matter came up incidentally on the 14th of last June, 
 at the Toronto Conference, with its president, Dr. Carman, in the 
 chair. The chairman alluded to the fact that a high ollicial of 
 Victoria University had endorsed the opinions of Professor Work- 
 man, and that if his (Burwash's) introduction was i-ight, the 
 dismissed professor should be reinstated. Whereupon the Rev. 
 Dr. Blackstock spoke very severely, as the newspaper report states, 
 of the practice of attacking ministers from the chair, and evidently 
 had a good deal of Conference sympathy behind him in doing so.f 
 
 * In order to show the sort of mouey-inaking literature wliioli tliu Metho- 
 dist Hook Publishing House cultivates, wo give free circulation to tiie 
 following advertisement, clipped from a recent issue of the Mail and F^inpire: 
 "Agents wanted— For our new book 'The Glory of Woman,' or bove, 
 M irriage and Matrimony ; coiitainiug full information of all the marvellous 
 and complex matters pertaining to woman ; bearing, nursing, and rearing 
 children ; hereditary (lescent ; hints on courtship and marriage^; promoting 
 health and beauty ; vigour of mind and body ; together with the diseases 
 pecuUivr to the female sex ; their causes, symptoms, and treatment ; the 
 whole forming a complete medical guide for women ; embellished with nuvny 
 aupe' oloured platen, phototype and wood engravings ; send fifty cents for 
 outfit. William Briggs, Wesley buildings, Toronto." 
 
 + How the heterodox leaven has affected the Methodist body may be 
 gathered from the foUowing paragraph clipped from the Mail and Empire of 
 a recent date : — 
 
 " The talk of Chancellor Burwanh being called to task before the regents 
 of Victoria College by the genera! superintendent at the August meeting of 
 the board is quite lively in Methodist ministerial circles. Among the state- 
 ments made by Toronto Methodist preachers who belong to the "advanced 
 thought " section are that the He v. Dr. Shaw, principal of the VVesleyan Theo. 
 
OF PUOHnUTlON. 
 
 47 
 
 Hut Profossor Workiimii !iii»l tJliancellur liurvviv.sli ans not by 
 any inuans the only Methodist divinuH who can now be charged 
 with inculcating heUu-odox or oven heretical views. A very 
 largo number of Methodist niinisterK in Canada although well 
 aware that the practice of the orthodox Christian churches, for 
 «)ver eighteen hundred years, was to celebrate the Eucharist with 
 feruientod wine, now insist on giving a syrup inst(>ad ; and are 
 thus virtually guilty of tlii; heresy «)f withholding the true sacru- 
 ntental cup from the laity. In doing this tliey cannot for u 
 moment plead the example of their great founder, John Wesley ; 
 nor the teachings of their ujust able eonimontator, Dr. Clark. Tt 
 is to 1)0 much regretted that the more religiously conservative 
 Presbyterian church of Canada, is now t.avelling a good deal in 
 the same heretical direction, despite the action of the Assembly of 
 Belfast, as given elsewhere. The unsound doctrine of Christian Per- 
 f(;ction, which the MethcKlist church has added tt) the pure doctrines 
 it derived from the Church of England, tends to make it more Phar- 
 asaical than it would otherwise be — to imbue it more strongly 
 with the " I am holier than thou " idea. Saturated, accordingly, 
 with the true super-extra holiness sjtirit, it now evidently stands 
 prepared to enforce its peculiar opinions upon other denonunations. 
 And in order to justify its own heretical practice, as regards the 
 refusal of wine at the communion table, it would, if possible, pre- 
 vent the making or importation of wine for .sacramental as well as 
 any other purpose. As the Church of England, as well as the 
 niore orthodox members »jf the Presbyterian church, hold that no 
 valid administration of the La.st Supper can take place without the 
 use of true wine, and wholly ignore the bogus Methodist article, 
 the painful position in which they would be placed by Prohibition 
 will fit once become apparent. No womler that Ai-chbishop 
 Machray is opposed to Prohibition, and declares that he cannot 
 vote for it, and no wonder also that Principal Grant, the most able 
 clergyman by all odds oi. the Presbyterian church in Canada, 
 
 logical lastitute, Montreal, ia in the same category aa ChaiiceUor Burwash, 
 because, in his recent publication, he declares that Christ, when tlescril'ing 
 future torment, was speaking in a metaphorical sense. The same '• school " 
 of Methodist divines ask who among the professors at Victoria College is 
 orthodox if (Chancellor Burwash is not. It is further asserted that it will be 
 found impossible to formulate charges against Chancellor Burwash atl'ecting 
 his standing as a Methodist minister, an<l it is claimed on his behalf that 
 such should be the only question to be r.aised. 
 
 " In consequence of the foregoing statements a representative of The Mail 
 and Empire asked from an official source yesterday morning what was the 
 " Methodist Standard of Faith?" The reply was, "The tifty-two sermons 
 and notes of John Wesley." The local Methodist higher critics state that if 
 Dr. Carman presses his charge against Chancellor Burwash 's orthodoxy or 
 suitability, holding the views of a higher critic, for the principalship of the 
 Methodist university, ten times as much diflference can be established 
 between Dr. Carman's teachings and John Wesley's, as compared with the 
 divergence of the teachings of Chancellor Burwash and the founder of 
 Methodism." 
 
48 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 declared in a luttAr to the Globe, in the autuum uf 1893, that he 
 was nut in favuur uf Prohibition. 
 
 CliERICAL I'OLITICS IN ONTAItlO. 
 
 In every age and in every civilized com»try there huH always 
 existed, as regards the clerical orders, a latent desire to unduly 
 elevate themselves at the expense of the laity. The Methodist 
 church forms no exception to the general rule. For nearly a cen- 
 tury its clerical order governed their lay brethren after the most 
 despotic fashion, and refu.-ied to admit them as co-legislators into 
 conference. The English Methotlist Conference,* constituted by a 
 deed of declaration filed in the Court of Chancery in 1784, made 
 no provision for lay representation, which was only conceded, in 
 either hcmisphere,after a long,and frequently acrimonious, struggle, 
 within the last thirty years. Made exceedingly strong, wealthy 
 and influential, during the past decade, by the union of its princi- 
 pal wings, the clerical section of the Canadian Methodist church 
 has, in recent years, asserted itself as forcibly as possible, not only 
 in the religious field, but also in the political arena. In Ontario, 
 especially, it aspires to the same po.sition of power and authority 
 which the Roman Catholic hierarchy holds in the Province of 
 Quebec. It is true, that it may not so directly assert itself, and 
 has, owing to the force of circumstances, to operate on different 
 lines, and with more caution. But the latent lust to unduly 
 elevate itself nt the expense of the laity, and of other churches, is 
 (juite as apparent in one case as in the other. The only difference 
 is, that the Protestant divine is the more Jesuitical of the two. 
 Under the guise of advocating Prohibition, as a great moral and 
 even religious movement, Methodist clerics bullied and badgered 
 Sir Oliver Mowat, their political friend (they are chiefly Grits of 
 the straitest type) for several years, and so worried him that in 
 order to escape from his dictatorial and persistent persecutors, he 
 Anally surrendered the proud position of Premier of the great 
 Province of Ontario, and took lefuge in a subordinate portfolio in 
 the Laurier administration. Sir Oliver is a wise man in his day 
 and generation, and agreeing with Butler's Hudibras, 
 
 That he who tichta and runs away, 
 Will live to fight another day, 
 
 came to the conclusion that a good retreat was better than a bad 
 
 * In Great Britain there never has been a union of the various principal 
 Methodist bodies as in Canada. There the Primitive Methodists, who adhere 
 more closely to the John Wesley standard than the others, are very numer- 
 ous and influential. They have 1,113 ministers and nearly seventeen thous- 
 and lay preachers, against 2,358 Weeleyan Methodist ministers and 17,224 
 lay preachers. There are five other smaller branches of Methodism in the 
 British islands who have about nine hundred ministers altogether. 
 
OF PUOHriUTION. 
 
 49 
 
 hattle. He had tried to coriuiliato iuH MuthodiHt clcricnl frieiida 
 as far aH it wan possible for him to do (without neriouHly wounding 
 the financial int«rastH of tho Province) liy making tho liquor 
 licenxn law more and moru stringont. But ho found that nothing 
 would ploaso thorn uulesH ho went tho whole Prohibition hog. His 
 retreat was HkilfuUy accomplished, l)ut it was a retreat all the 
 same. Had Hir Oliver been a little less anxious to play the role of 
 the Christian Stnteamaii, and not ho seriouHly desirous to placate 
 these sharp clerical politicians, his later position would have been 
 much more comfortable and independent, and he would have had 
 their support into the bargain, for they dare not turn him out to 
 let in their Tory foes. His successor, Mr. Hardy, should consider 
 these facts well, and shape his course accordingly. Unquestion- 
 ably he has a hard road to travel, and will encounter a good deal 
 more thorns than roses ns he journeys onward. That he has to 
 fight his would-be masters at a disadvantage, is true in more senses 
 than one. As they are not taxpayers, and so contribute nothing 
 whatever towards the support of the commonwealth, they are not 
 moved by any personal financial considerations, and from this 
 stand point, can snap their fingers safely in his face. But while free 
 from taxation themselves, they never hesitate a moment to impose 
 the most severe additional burdens on the hacks of the tax-paying 
 laity. Their patriotism is, accordingly, a good deal like that of 
 the whilom humorist, Artemus Ward, who was quite willing to 
 sacrifice all his wife's relations, and all his cousins and his aunts, 
 into the bargain, for the good of his country, provided his own 
 personal interests were left untouched — his own skin left uninjur- 
 ed. Mr. Hardy cannot, therefore, reach them from the dollar and 
 cent direction, nor frighten them by any proposed screw as regards 
 their own pockets. The sort of treatment he may expect at their 
 hands in tlie future may be pretty accurately guaged from past 
 experience, and that not of a very remote date either. In the 
 earlier part of this year (1897) a representative Prohibition gath- 
 ering took place at Toronto, at which the Liquor License Bill, then 
 before the Ontario Legislature, came up for consideration, and was 
 condemned because it did not go sufficiently far to meet the views 
 of those present. The government as a body was roundly abused, 
 but the Minister of Education, who has been fond of posing as a 
 fierce temperance man, with a view to strengthen his political posi- 
 tion, was subjected to the hardest knocks. For example, the Rev. 
 Arthur Browning, a member of the Toronto Methodist Conference, 
 first assaulted and then battered him as follows : — 
 
 " But when he (Mr. Ross) appeared at our convention, made that temper* 
 ance speech, and now endorses that miserable, deceptive, lying, devilish Bill« 
 then I say God have mercy on that man." 
 
 The Christian Guardian, the official organ of the Methodist 
 church in Canada, is continually threatening the Ontario govern- 
 ment unless its policy suits it better. In one of its last March 
 issues it calls upon the temperance voters to turn out and defeat 
 
50 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 the Hardy government for loitering, and declared that one defeat 
 would make the politicians open their eyes. The temperance dele- 
 gates who waited upon Mr. Hardy, while the Liijuor License 
 Bill was under consideration, were so extreme, and even rude and 
 ill-mannered, in their language anc'. demeanor, that Dr. Carman, 
 general superintendent of the Methodist church, considered himself 
 bound to administer a public rebuke. On the 22nd of last March 
 he delivered a lecture in one of the London churches on " Trade 
 and Get Rich," and according to the Daily Advocate of that city, 
 used the following language : — 
 
 " No business had a right on the earth unless it, somewhere along the lino, 
 renders a fair account. There were inany occupations which wouhl scarcely 
 stand on this ground. Gamblers, "^rs, and those who dabbled in wikl 
 speculations were certainly not giviiig ine quid pro quo. With regard to the 
 liquor traffic, he thought that it could not be defended on this ground, but 
 still the men who were engaged in the traffic had a right to be heard. They 
 would generally speak like gentlemen, as they did when they waited upon 
 Mr. Hardy's government recency. On this occasion they presented their 
 claims with a dignity and firmness, which was in striking contrast to the 
 conduct of the temperance people when they waited on the government. 
 The latter deputation had conducted themselves mucli like scolding women. 
 What was wanted in such cases was a quiet dignitj' of manner, A few 
 essential points should be advanced and insisted upon. Many platforms had 
 come down with a crash because they were too bulky." 
 
 It is quite apparent that the Prohibitionists of Ontario, and 
 especially their more important Methodist section, are bound to bully 
 the Hardy government if possible, and to compel it to submit to 
 their dictation. Over-rating their influence and importance as a 
 factor in Dominion politics, the Laurier administration has already 
 made certain preliminary concessions to their demands, and prom- 
 ised them a Plebiscite, which will cost the country at least two 
 hundred thousand dollars — the first instalment of the vast sum 
 that the people will have to pay for Prohibition. But the state- 
 ment that the elector would not only be asked whether or no he 
 was in favour of Prohibition, but also whether he was willing to 
 be taxed to make good the loss which the public revenue must 
 sustain, has caused a serious storm in every direction, and in every 
 Methodist gath" Mig from one end of the I)ominion to the other. 
 In ordinary business methods — in the usual routine of every day 
 life — every honest man who undertakes to effect a purchase, or 
 build a house, or buy a fnrm, will, in the first place, make provis- 
 ion to duly meet the liability he incurs. The same straight-forward 
 course precisely should be pursued in the case of Prohibition ; and 
 if the electorate desire the measure they should provide for the 
 payment of the incidental expenditure. A Prohibition vote that 
 is not ready to pay fairly and honestly all damages, will most 
 certainly not be of much use in enforcing a Prohibitory law. The 
 agitation against the double vote is deceitful in every aspect. It 
 aims to lead the elector to support it by making him believe that 
 Prohibition would virtually cost him nothing, and that the govern- 
 ment in some way would meet the additional outlay, so that no 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 51 
 
 part of that outlay would come out of his pocket. What a palpable 
 fraud ! Nearly all the Federal revenue of the country comes out 
 of custom's duties, or other indirect modes of taxation, but the 
 people pay the bill all the same in the increased prices of the 
 articles they buy, whether they be dry goods, or clothing, or 
 groceries, or hardware, or any other commodity they may need, 
 lu this connection we had better quote the opinion of that leading 
 Liberal light, Mr. David Mills, who is regarded as a very high 
 authority on Dominion economics as well as on constitutional law. 
 He was asked, a short time ago, if he were in favour of submitting, 
 in the coming plebiscite, the single question of yes or no on Prohi- 
 bition, without any mention of meeting the deficit in the revenue, 
 and replied as follows : — 
 
 " I am not. I am very mncli opposed to it. The honest thing is to put 
 the whole matter before the people. Of course, I do not know what line of 
 action the Government and Parliament will adopt, but in my opinion the 
 measure that is required to give effect to the decision of the public, in case 
 Prohibition carries, ought to be the matter upon which the vote is taken. 
 The Ministers must decide upon how they will meet the loss of revenue that 
 will be caused by the adoption of Prohibition, and the creditors of Canada 
 are entitled to know how the $7,500,000 of revenue that will be wiped out 
 by Prohibition is to be made up. It is possible that some portion of the loss 
 can be made up by taxes upon tea and upon coffee, but the greater portion, 
 in my opinion, can be made up only by a direct tax. There should be a 
 well-considered bill prepared, and the vote should be taken upon it. The 
 question is not whether the public favour Prohibition in the abstract. It 
 is whether they are ready honestly to carry it out in the concrete. The 
 abstract proposition does not mean anything, and it will be wholly delusive 
 to submit it, because it will be no indication of the real conviction of the 
 public." 
 
 Mr. Mills is an honest man, and evidently does not feel disposed 
 to lend himself to any act of deception in order to secure the 
 success of a plebiscite vote. Hence he desires that the full issue 
 should be squarely placed before the elector. 
 
 As regards the clerical Methodist politicians of Ontario, who .so 
 hunger and thirst after increased power and influence, their seat 
 of war has, for the present, been transferred from Toronto to 
 Ottawa. All the insolent badgering and bullying possible have 
 been inflicted on the Hardy government, and no doubt the same 
 policy is to be pursued towards the Federal Cabinet, should it not 
 prove sufticiently subservient. The proposed double plebiscite 
 question to the elector is fiercely denounced, threats of every sort 
 abound, and Sir Wilfred Laurier is to be turned out without much 
 ceremony, by Methodist votes, if he does not completely surrender 
 to the new school of clerical politicians, who claim to carry these 
 votes around in the pockets of their pantaloons.* But, after all, 
 
 * The Presbyterian General Assembly, which met at Winnipeg on the 17th 
 of last June, (1897) took the proper view of the questions which should be 
 submitted to the electorate at the plebiscite, as the annexed despuuch 
 shows : — 
 
 Winnipeg, June 17. — While the special committee of the Presbyterian 
 General Assembly was out of the house, deliberating, the Assembly was 
 
52 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 there may lie a case of false pretences, to a greater or less extent, 
 as regards this claim. There can be very little doubt that 
 when the crisis comes, the ambitious clerics will find themselves 
 quietly ignored by their congregations, who will not desert their 
 party at their behest, and will secretly vote for their political 
 friends. In Ireland, where the Roman Catholic hierarchy has so 
 long ruled supreme, the people are at last freeing themselves from 
 clerical bondage, and have commenced to do their own political 
 thinking. There Mr. John Hayden, of Roscommon, has been for 
 years in direct conflict with the Bishop of Meath, who has pub- 
 lished repeated pastorals denouncing him from the altar. The 
 Bishop also forbade his flock, under the pain of mortal sin, to read 
 the Westmeath Examiner, Mi Ilayden's paper. But, in spite of 
 all this the paper flourishes, and Mr. Hayden himself has recently 
 been returned, without opposition, as member of Parliament for 
 Roscommon, the clerical party not venturing to run a candidate 
 against him. 
 
 The victory of the Liberal party in the last Dominion general 
 election, in the Province of Quebec, despite the strenuous opposi- 
 tion of its hierarchy, and all the adverse agitation on the Manitoba 
 school question, was a most important one, as regards freedom of 
 human thought and political action ; and cannot fail to produce 
 the most beneficial results throughout the whole Dominion. The 
 Vatican has already realised the significant value of the victory, 
 and sent its special delegate, Monseigneur Merry Del Val, to 
 carry the olive branch to Canada, and to inaugurate an era of 
 peace — to abate undue clerical pretension, which, under existing 
 circumstances, could only produce fratricidal strife. It now 
 remains to be seen whether Sir Wilfred Laurier, after having done 
 so much for the people of Canada, as regards his own province ; 
 and having recently won fresh victories in the diplomatic field of 
 the Old World, will tamely bow before the clerical leaders of the 
 Methodist church of Ontario, and surrender his political life into 
 their hands, to have his head surely cut off" by hostile circumstances 1 
 Time alone can tell ! 
 
 marked by a little breeze over a resolution broagbt in, as addendum to the 
 report on Church Life and Work, which had reference to the plebiscite, to 
 be submitted by the Dominion government. 
 
 The view t-iken by a minority of the assembly was that the court should 
 leave the govcnmeufc with the promise ifc has made, to go forward untram- 
 melled by further suggestion or resolution. 
 
 The majority thought it might be helpful to the cause of temperance, and 
 to the country at large, if the added taxation c'ause bearing upon the prom- 
 ises of the government and the expectations of the country were added in 
 the pronouncement of the geixeral subject. 
 
CHAPTER V. 
 PROHIBITION ALL THE WORLD OVER. 
 
 "TTTHEN one examines, with any care, the social and economic 
 VV conditions of European nations, he will very soon become 
 sensible of the fact that Prohibition can never be adopted by any 
 of them. The promotion of temperance amongst theso nations 
 must always be restricted to moral and religious teaching. In 
 England, bread and cheese and beer form no small part of the 
 food of the working classes, who, with their inherited sturdy feel- 
 ing of independence, would promptly resent any interference with 
 their natural right to eat and drink as they please. Estimating 
 the population of the British Islands to-day at 39,000,000, the 
 annual consumption of beer at 28 gallons per head, the stated 
 average, would amount to 1,092,000,000 * The consumption of wine 
 and spirits together does not exceed over a gallon and a half per 
 head of the population. The better classes restrict themselves to 
 wine, and to a comparatively small quantity of brandy and distilled 
 spirits, and use very little beer, more than five-sixths of which are 
 consumed by the working classes. In all the great cities of Eng- 
 land extreme poverty, and the absence of good food, form the chief 
 incentives to intemperance among the lower classes, who resort to 
 drink to drown their sense of misery and want. Experience has 
 shown, that if these poor people were fairly well housed, and 
 supplied with good food, they would speedily rise to a higher social 
 plane, and become more sober and better citizens in every way. 
 But reformation must always come on voluntary lines in the 
 British Islands. The masses there will submit to no coercion, and 
 no government would dare to entertain the idea for a moment 
 of resorting to a Prohibitory law to coerce the people into becom- 
 
 • There were, at the close of 1895. 8,937 breweries in England, Scotland 
 and Ireland, whose yearly output amounted to about one thousand four 
 hundred million gallons of beer. The surplus over 28 gallons per head, of 
 the population, was exported to foreign countries. The consumption of beer 
 per head in England is greater than in Germany, solely because the masses 
 ure better off, and thus have greater purchasing power. 
 
64 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 ing more sober, or more moral otherwise. A moderately stringent 
 license law is about all the temperance coercive legislation that the 
 people will stand in any part of the Mother Country. Meanwhile 
 temperance based upon the better housing and feeding of the 
 working classes, and moral and religious teaching, is making safe 
 and solid progress there. Combined benefit and temperance 
 societies largely abound, and at the recent annual meeting of the 
 Rechabite Association it was announced that its general l>enefit 
 fund had risen to the huge sum of four million dollars. There 
 cannot be the slightest doubt that temperance benetit societies 
 would also be very successful in Canada. There is the voluntary 
 possible in this and in other sensible directions for our Canadian 
 Prohibitionists, wlio are now so eagerly and so unwisely seeking 
 for legal coercion and the impossible. Looking at the matter from 
 every standpoint, it may be very safely assumed that nr. Prohibi- 
 tory law will ever be enacted by the British Parliament-. 
 
 Let us cross the English channel from T)over to C"lais, and see 
 for ourselves what prospects there arc '' a Prohibitory law in 
 France. Here we find a quick-witted, ndustrious and money- 
 getting people. The French revolution almost entirely extinguish- 
 ed the landlord class, as regards the property of the soil, and the 
 peasant farmer straightway became the owner in fee .simple of 
 his holding. It might naturally be supposed that this condition 
 of things would supply the highest social ideal for temperance 
 progress. But Prohibition is never heard of in France. Whatever 
 temperance exists there is based solely on the voluntary principle 
 resulting from moral forces. The masses are enormous wine- 
 drinkers all the time, and yet drunkenness, although now becoming 
 more common in the cities, owing to the increased use of distilled 
 spirits, is a rare thing in the rural districts. More than thrf,e- 
 fourths of the soil of France are grape lands, and the quantity of 
 wine produced annually in France is very great. A few years ago 
 the annual output was almost two thousand million of gallons, bu t 
 the ravages of hostile insects have largely reduced the vineyards in 
 recent times, and in 1895 their total production did not much exceed 
 one-third of the former yield.* Three-fourths of all the wine pro- 
 duced in Fi'ance are consumed at home, and her exports now, 
 including champagne, are worth some forty millions of dollars 
 annually. Of cogniac and other brandies, and spirits, she exports 
 about sixteen million dollars' worth, France, accordingly, will 
 never see her Parliament pass a Prohibitory law, or preventing the 
 production and exportation of fermented liquors. Her interests 
 in the other direction are too great. 
 
 Let us next cross the Rhine into Germany, and examine the pros- 
 
 * The report of the French Minister of Agriculture for 1895, puts the wine 
 production for that year at 587,127,000 gallons. In addition to her distill- 
 eries for the manufacture of brandies, &c., France has 2,627 breweries, 
 which have an annual output of 8,867,320 hectojiters of beer. A hectoliter 
 s equal to 26.414 gallons. 
 
 /.. <^' 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 66 
 
 poets of a Prohibitory law there. Prom the Kaiser down to the 
 humblest peasant, the Germans may be safely said to be a beer- 
 loving people. They drink beer morning, noon and night, and 
 whenever they can get it — men, women and children. Their 
 passion for this national beverage is only restrained by their 
 inability, as regards the working classes, to purchase it. The 
 Englishman consequently drinks more beer on the average than 
 the German, but the Scotchinan and Irishman drink much less. 
 The latest reliable statistics show that each German consumes 
 almost as much beer as the average Englishman, and twenty-six 
 gallons per head per annum is not l)y any means too high an esti- 
 mate. Let the reader multiply for himself fifty-three millions of 
 population by twenty-six, and he will realise a prodigious total.* 
 The (rerman may submit to be dragooned by his despotic Kaiser, 
 and to be drilled to death in the huge army of father-land, but let 
 any one in authority touch his beer, and such a rebellion will at 
 once arise as must overturn every govei-nment in the country. 
 There can be no Prohibition there. 
 
 Austria-Hungary, with a population some ten millions less than 
 Germany, has 1.747 breweries within her borders, which produce 
 19,488,993 hectoliters of beer annually. Her wine production, 
 like that of Germany, has increased in rf ?ent years, and in 1895 
 reached 129,030,000 gallons. Ihere is not a shadow of Prohibition 
 sentiment in Austria, and voluntary temperance is alone possible 
 there. Italy does very little in the way of beer, and has only 113 
 breweries, with an annual output of 96,750 hectoliters, but she is 
 one of the chief wine-making countries of Europe. Like the other 
 great vine-growing countries of southern Europe, the insect pest, 
 phylloxera vastatrix, has been terribly destructive in Italy, and in 
 1895 her wine production had fallen to 469,555,000 gallons. The 
 Italian is not much of a beer drinker, and when he cannot get 
 wine takes to whiskey very readily. There is no Prohibition senti- 
 ment in his bosom. The dignified and sedate Spaniard is temper- 
 ate from nature and habit, and owns only 49 breweries, which 
 produce annually 128,375 hectoliters of beer. But Spain is a 
 great vine growing country, and a few years ago produced a vast 
 quantity of fine wines, But the insect plague has caused her 
 enormous loss, and in 1895 her wine production only reached 
 379,500,000 gallons. All the small states of Eastern Europe 
 are wine producing to a large extent ; and while Turkey has no 
 breweries, it produced nearly .sixty million gallons of wine in 1895. 
 Russia has only 1,148 breweries, with an annual output of 4,578,- 
 
 * In the German Empire there are 21,395 breweries, with a total annual 
 output of 55,243,753 hectoliters, nearly all of which may he said to be con- 
 sumed at home. The wine production of Germany has greatly increased in 
 recent years, and in 1895 rose to 80,190,000 gallons. During the last decade 
 the Germans have commenced to turn their attention to the manufacture of 
 brandy, but mostly for export. Beer continues to be their one great 
 beverage. 
 
56 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 260 hectoliters, but is fast becoming a great wine-producing 
 country. Her wino harvest in 1895 amounted to about one hun 
 dred million gallons. Her poorer classes use little beer or wine, 
 but like other natives of cold countries are addicted to the use of 
 spirits, for the manufacture of which ilistilleries everywhere 
 abound. Russia still continues to import fine French brandies and 
 rich wines for her upper classes. It is scarcely necessary to say 
 that there are no Prohibition societies throughout her broad 
 domains, and outside her Mahometan population little temper- 
 ance sentiment of any kind exists. From the brief statistics we 
 have now supplied, it will be seen that all Europe is largely given 
 up to beer and spirit making, and to the wine industry ; and that 
 no strong temperance sentiment exists anywhere among the masses 
 of its peoples outside of Great Britain. Prohibition legislation is 
 everywhere an impossibility just now, and there is not the remot- 
 est sign of any change, as regards the future, in any European 
 country. 
 
 Let us now recross the Atlantic, and take a good look at the 
 Prohibition of the United States, the principal source of all the 
 agitation that is at present disturbing our own country. The total 
 number of breweries there, at the close" of 1895, stood at 2,112, 
 and their output for that year amounted to 38,500,000 hectoliters. 
 The production of wine in the United States has increased prodi- 
 giously during the past decade, and has risen from about ten million 
 gallons in 1885 to 89,700,000 gallons in 1895. Nearly all of this 
 was absorbed by home consumption, and in addition over three 
 million gallons of champagne and other fine wines were imported 
 from Europe. The distilleries of the United States produced in 
 1894 92,153,650 gallons of spirits, of one kind or another, and the 
 total consumption of wine and spirits for that year amounted to 
 1,148,153,155 gallons, against 506,076,400 gallons in 1880, show- 
 ing that the consumption had more than doubled in fourteen years. 
 It will thus be seen that the Prohibition sentiment in the United 
 States has not afiected, from a general standpoint, the consumption 
 of liquor there, and that they are fast becoming a great wine- 
 producing, spirit-distilling, and beer-making country. Our thin 
 ribbon of population scattered along a frontier line thousands of 
 miles in extent, would, in the event of our adopting Prohibition, 
 be simply deluged with smuggled liquor at every point. We would 
 soon get all the benefit, with a vengeance, of the surplus stocks of 
 all Yankeedom, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and would be 
 merely destroying important industries of our own to benefit our 
 grasping neighbours. That result, considered by the light of all 
 the facts we have already presented to our readers, can hardly fail 
 to be regarded as a matter of undoubted certainty. 
 
 Having shown, from ofllicial statistics, how little Prohibition 
 sentiment has accomplished in the United States as a whole, it 
 remains for us to enquire what it has done for that particular 
 exemplar state, Maine, where it has been so long adopted. Here 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 57 
 
 we have at hand most valuable assistance, in a book published in 
 Boston during the earlier part of the present year (1897), termed 
 " The Liquor Problem in its Legislative Aspects." While this 
 work is written from a temperance sfeindpoint, it is so fair in its 
 presentation of tacts, and so just in its conclusions, that one can 
 accept both without the slightest hesitation. We may state, how- 
 ever, by way of explanation, that during the present decade a 
 society of eminent literary men, clerical and lay, hailing from all 
 parts of the United States, with their headquarters at New York, 
 was formed for the purpose of enquiring into leading social prob- 
 lems of the day, ancl publishing, for general information, the 
 conclusions arrived at. At a meeting of this society, held in New 
 York in October, 1893, four sub-committees were appointed to 
 investigate diiferent aspects of the drink problem — physiological, 
 legislative, economic and ethical. A considerable sum of money 
 (S6,500) was raised to pay expenses, and in April, 1894, Dr. 
 Wines, of Springfield, Illinois, and Mr. John Keren, of Boston, 
 were charged with the duty of personally investigating the work- 
 ing of the liquor legislation in eight states of the Union,where that 
 legislation has been of a special character. As the result of their 
 most impartial and straightforward investigations, " The Liquor 
 Problem in its Legislative Aspects," has been given to the public. 
 This book should be read carefully by every person who desires to 
 arrive at right conclusions, as to the true value of Prohibition in 
 the United States. 
 
 What is known as the Maine Law has been in force in that 
 state, with a short interval, since June 2nd, 1851. This measure 
 was drafted by Neal Dow. It prohibited the manufacture of 
 intoxicants, and their sale, except by agents authorized by munici- 
 palities to sell for medicinal and mechanical purposes only* ; pro- 
 vided for the punishment of first oftence by fines, subsequent 
 offences by fines and imprisonment ; declared clerks, servants and 
 agents, equally guilty with the principals, and made it the duty of 
 the authorities in townships and cities to prosecute all violators of 
 the law upon the information of competent persons. The legal 
 machin;pry which had been created for its enforcement not being 
 found sufficient, more stringent provisions were enacted in 1853. 
 Great riots followed the attempt to enforce the law, and in 1856 it 
 was repealed, and a limited license law adopted, which remained 
 in force until 1858, when a fresh and more stringent Prohibitory 
 law was enacted. Meanwhile, the law had become a mere political 
 football, as shown by the election returns.! But the Prohibition 
 
 * No importation, nor manufacture of wine for sacramental purposes was 
 permitted by this law. The religious condition of the State of Maine was 
 never at a lower point than it is to-day. Infidelity abounds there as it does 
 in all the northern New England states, and the churches are so poorly 
 supported in the rural districts that they have to be formed into groups so 
 that the minister may be paid. 
 
 t See The Liquor Problem, p. p. 25, 26. 
 
58 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 party was constantly crying for more stringent laws, and since 
 1H58 nearly fifty anieritlmonts luive been enacted ; and the most 
 strenuous efforts were made to enforce the law, especially in Port- 
 land. Nevertherless, in 1886, at least 158 liquor shops existed in 
 that city. Men who abstained did so voluntarily, and not because 
 of the law ; drinking clubs sprang up in every direction, and 
 although there were no distilleries, the supply of liquor was unfail- 
 ing, but the (juality was worse. Open bars existed on side streets, 
 and those who shunned these resorts obtained their supplies from 
 the drug stores. In 1892 great efforts were made to enforce the 
 law, and the open sale of liquor was stopped, but this only set a 
 regiment of pocket peddlers, estimated at 200, in motion, and so 
 the last state of things became worse than the first. The history 
 of Prohibition in the state of Maine fills 95 pages of The Licjuor 
 Problem, and the miserable story of political and official back- 
 slidings must be read in full there, as we have not space to even 
 sunnuarise it. We may state, however, that the report of the 
 state liquor commissioner showed that in 189;{ there were sold in 
 Maine, presumably for mechanical and medicinal purposes, 34,348,- 
 gallons of licjuor, of the value of $130,812, independent of the 
 large illicit sales by individuals. According to the special United 
 States tax payments the sale of liquor existed, in 1895, in 87 
 places in Maine, containing 407,925 of the 661,086 inhabitants of 
 the whole state, or about 61 per cent, and many liquor dealers 
 evaded the payment of this tax altogether. At every session of 
 the United States court, said the presiding judge, from eight to 
 ten cases are tried for violation of the United States revenue law 
 — that is for failure to pay the Federal special tax.* But for the 
 liquor cases the criminal docket, in Maine, would be reduced to 
 less than one-half of its present proportions.! After an exhaustive 
 review of Prohibition in that state, which occupies nearly a third 
 of the book. The Liquor Problem sums up as follows : — 
 
 "How far Prohibition has fostered sobriety in Maine must be inferred 
 from the manner of its enforcement and the extent of the illicit trathc. The 
 question is at bottom one of consumption, not whence come the supplies, and 
 how they are delivered to the customer ; but data of consumption are 
 unattainable, although positive statements relative to its amount are as 
 frequent as they are untrustworth}'. Furthermore, in measuring the benefits 
 of Prohibition, a completely unregulated traffic cannot be taken as a stand-., 
 ard of comparison. Neither can it be taken for granted that the good results 
 of a prohibitory regime in semi-rural communities are due to prohibitory 
 legislation. In Massachusetts, for instance, the number of towns outlawing 
 the saloon, previous to the enactment of the local option law, far exceeded 
 the number of towns in Maine where, at the same time. Prohibition was 
 partially enforced. And there are other considerations to be weighed 
 carefully. 
 
 * The Liquor Problem, p. 86. The United States revenue officers com- 
 pelled all litjuor dealers, whether illicit or otherwise, to pay the Federal tax, 
 but never aided in any way to enforce the state laws. That duty was invar- 
 iably left by them to the local officers. 
 
 t The Liquor Problem, p. 88. 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 59 
 
 "Tho fact that Prohibition has so long had a place on the statute books, 
 and latterly in the Constitution, has fostered a feeling of security detri- 
 mental to the cause of temperance pure and simple. Men in sympathy with 
 tiie aim of Prohibition complain that the temi)eranco work which formerly 
 reached the masses has degenerateil into meetings for political purposes, or 
 that the agitation for abstinence has become a cry for police and detective 
 methods. The identification of great teuiperance organizations with party 
 politics has crippled tlieir inHuence as popular moral agents, however much 
 it may have aided tlio election of otHcials chosen for prohibitory purposes. 
 
 " As to the relation of politics to Prohibition, it is a pertinent remark that 
 " politics have a double eH'ect in Maine, weakening the opposition to tlie law 
 itself as well as weakening its enforcement." In other words, whether to 
 win favor or because of fear, many men assume a friendly attitude toward 
 the law in which they disbelieve. The ([Uestion of enforcement depends 
 mainly upon political exigencies, which, again, depend on the state of public 
 opinion. A full-blown hypocrisy must result from tliis method of dealing 
 with Prohibition. Nowhere is it so blatant as in tlio legislative halls, where 
 men lend their votes in support of restrictive measures of which they not 
 only disapprove, but violate openly and even grossly. The corrupting 
 influence of a Large social element thriving in defiance of all law needs no 
 further elucidation ; bribery, perjury, and official dishonour follow it." 
 
 These extracts will enable our readers to form, for themselves, a 
 correct estimate of the most unsatisfactory character of the history 
 of Prohibition in the state of Maine, where it has been in opera- 
 tion for over forty years ; and that, too, under the most favourable 
 circumstances, as regards legislation and general public sentiment, 
 as told by honest friends of temperance. We shall now proceed 
 to add some further facts, in the same direction, gleaned from 
 other authentic sources. 
 
 The claim, so frequently advanced, (but never sustained by 
 satisfactory proof) tliat Prohibition promotes the healthy increase 
 of population, and general prosperity, does not appear to hold good 
 as regards the state of Maine. In 1880 it had 64,309 farm home- 
 steads, and 3,484,908 acres of land in pasture, or under crops of 
 one kind or another. In 1890 its farm homesteads had decreased 
 to 02,013, and its tillable land to 3,044,606 acres. These figures, 
 taken from the United States census returns, show a loss to 
 Maine, in a single decade, of 2,296 farm homesteads, and ^440,242 
 acres of land gone out of cultivation, and relapsing into ,a wilder- 
 ness condition. The population of the stat(!, including towns and 
 villages, which stood at 048,930 in 1880, had, in 1890, only in- 
 creased to 001,080, or 12,150 altogether, or a fraction over two 
 per cent. It should not be forgotten, at the same time, that Maine 
 is comparatively a nev/ state, and still owns a large amount of wild 
 laud. The little state of llhode Island, which has always been 
 under a license law, has a population of 34o,.")00, or somewhat over 
 half that of Maine. Let us compare a few of the health statistics 
 of these two states. In doing so, however, it should be borne in 
 mind that Rhode Island has mostly a factory population, which 
 
 * In order to make our readers more fully actpiaiuteJ with the character of 
 the information supplied by "The Liquor Problem," we copy in the appen- 
 dix editorials from the Toronto Globe and Montreal Oazeitc. 
 
60 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 should not be at all as healthy as the chiefly agricultural popula- 
 tion of Maine : — 
 
 Maine, 18%. Rhodo Island, 189G. 
 
 No. of Insane persons 1 299 .... 792 
 
 •« Idiotic " 1591 .... 488 
 
 " Deaf and dumb persons . . 627 .... 162 
 
 " Blind persons 672 :J07 
 
 4189 1749 
 
 Leaving out small fractions, these figures (taken from the last 
 state census) show 63 afflicted persons to the tliousaiid of popula- 
 tion, or about six and a quarter per cent. Rhode Island ordy 
 shows 50 persons to the thousand, in the same unfortunate condi- 
 tion, or live per cent, of the population. Ontario statistics in the 
 same direction, for the year ending September 30th, 1896, give the 
 following results : — 
 
 No. of In.sane persons in the Province 4118 
 
 " Idiotic " •' " 605 
 
 " Deaf and dumb " " 310 
 
 '• Blind " " " 141 
 
 5174* 
 Tho population of Ontario, according to the last census, was 
 2,114,821, so that we average about 25 afflicted persons to the 
 thousand, or two and a half per cent, under a license law, to the 
 63 per thousand, or six and a quarter per cent., in the Prohibition 
 State of Maine. The unusually large number of idiotic persons in 
 that state, is said to arise from the fact that its people have 
 largely betaken themselves to alcoholised patent medicines, and 
 other kinds of pernicious stimulants, as substitutes for distilled 
 and malt liquors. 
 
 As Prohibition orators usually tell us so much now-a-days about 
 the terribly fatal effects of alcoholism on the public health, we 
 concluded that we had better ascertain how far their statements, 
 in this direction, were justified as regards our own Province. We 
 accordingly consulted the Annual Report of the Provincial Board 
 of Health, for the year 1896, in the expectation of finding there 
 the precise information needed. We regret, however, that this 
 Report is very defective, and that in a few instances only does it 
 give tables showing the causes of deaths. The report of the 
 Medical Health Officer of the city of Ottawa, which has now a 
 population of over fifty thousand, gives the total number of deaths 
 there for the year as 896. Among these was only one death from 
 alcoholism, while consumption claimed 92 deaths, and diarrhoea 
 (mostly children no doubt) 137. Nor has Ottawa ever been 
 famous for the strict temperance habits of its people. We might 
 state that the I'eturn also shows, that during the year there were 
 
 * Official Annual Report for 1896. 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 61 
 
 46 dentliH from hoarfc failure and heart disoase ; and as it in well 
 known that many d«!athH of this kind i-psuit from tho excessive use 
 of tobacco in Home shape, it is plain that the nicotine of that weed 
 kills a good many more people than alcohol, and just as gluttony 
 does also. In the city of St. Catherines the total deaths during 
 1H96, were 137, not one of which is charged to alcoholism, but ten 
 go to heart disease. In the city of Windsor there were 147 
 deaths in 1896, one only of which resulted from the use of liquor, 
 but 9 are charged to heart disease. Thus we see that out of a total 
 of 1180 deaths in these three cities, situated in the east, the west, 
 and middle of Ontario, only two are laid at the <loor of alcoholism. 
 It is a pity that the Report is not fuller in this direction, so that 
 we might pursue this interesting study at greater length. 
 
 During 1894, the last year for which we have any government 
 otKcial returns on this head, the convictions for drunkenness, in 
 the Province of Ontario, fell to the lowest point recorded, antl 
 stood at 3267, or one to every 667 of the population. It may be 
 safely assumed that the number is still less in the two succeeding 
 years. During the Scott Act years, that is from 1885 to 1889, 
 the convictions for drunkenness averaged annually 6243, or nearly 
 double the number in 1894. In 1889, the last year of the Scott 
 Act in the Province, the convictions stood at 7,059. These figures 
 sliow, beyond all cavil, that the people of Ontario are much more 
 sober and orderly under a good license law, than they were under 
 Prohibition. In the Province of Nova Scotia, 11 out of her 18 
 counties, and representing considerably over half her population, 
 are under the Scott Act. If Prohibitionist nostrums were good 
 for anything, the people down there by the sea would be much 
 more sober than those of Ontario. But, lo and behold, the total 
 convictions for drunkenness in 1894 footed, up to 1258, or one to 
 every 361 of the population. In 1884, before the Scott Act 
 became so generally in force in Nova Scotia, the convictions 
 for drunkenne.ss stood at 501, or one to every 751 of 
 the population, thus showing, in the plainest manner that the 
 Scott Act has greaoly increased, instead of diminishing intemper- 
 ance in that province. In New Brunswick, out of 14 counties, 9 
 are now under the Scott Act, and also two towns (Fredei-icton and 
 Yarmouth) representing altogether about three-fifths of the whole 
 population. In 1894 the total convictions for drunkenness in that 
 province stood at 1227 (about the usual previous average), or one 
 to every 262 of the population.* 
 • See the Dominion Statistical Year Book for 1895, pages 901 to 908. 
 
 CONCLUSION. 
 The great majority of Canadians have only a faint idea of the 
 condition of the liquor traffic in the United States, or what an 
 enormous political engine it has become, especially in the case of 
 large cities. There it is chiefly in the hands of the most danger- 
 ous and unscrupulous of the foreign population, who have little or 
 
62 (iENEHAL HEVIKW 
 
 no rolijj[ious principit! amongst thoiii, and indndd vory little princi- 
 plo of any kind. As a ruUt tlittir liconHon am obtaintMl tliroii^h tlio 
 inrtuencH ot" lotial politician.s, or ward hossos, to whom thoy pay a 
 tax in onu way or aiuitluM-, wliih^ thoy hav»> also to pay tlu^ police 
 for protection in curtain contingenciuH, and for ptirinittin^ tlitun to 
 evade the law at times witli inij)unity. A few years ago the 
 I)(Mnocratic Legislature of New York passed a Sunday closing law, 
 for the express purpos«s 'i*i it was aft(!rwards proved, of l(!vying 
 blackmail, on the li(iuor dealers of the state, for political and oth(M' 
 purposes. If timy refused to support the Democratic party by 
 contributing to its fund, and also by voting for it, the police closed 
 their bars on Sundays, and had them punished for violating tlni 
 law in any sha{)e. liut if they proved tluMuselves good Democrats 
 they were not interfenMl with. In I HOT) the llepublican party got 
 control of the Ijegislature, and of New York city as well, and 
 retaliated on their ])oliti(;al opponents, who had so long been 
 their masters, by enforcing the Democrats' Sunday closing law 
 against their saloon supporters, to their great consternation and 
 disgust.* In nearly all the largo cities the foreign element has 
 nt)W obtained complete mastery, and these cities literally seethe 
 with police and other municipal corruption, of one kind or another. 
 Evidence which has at tinuis cropped up in the courts, aiul during 
 the investigations of occasicmal commissions of eiujuiry, as well as 
 now and then exposure by independent newspapers, here ami 
 there, prove all this in the fullest manner. The writer occasion- 
 ally spends his summer vacations in lirooklyn. At one time cir- 
 cumstances rendered it necessary that he should visit various 
 public offices in New York City in seardi of special infonnation. 
 On no occasion did he meet a single genuine native American in 
 these offices. Everywhere the foreigner or his son, or some other 
 relation, held the fart. In this connection a New York journal 
 uses the following plain and true language : — 
 
 " What wo have got in this country is a colluction of the dregs of a hun> 
 dreil races, with all tlieir ignorance and passion. Anybody wlio liaa taken 
 the trouble to watch tlie course of most of the liCgisLatures of this year -or 
 even to notice the kind of persons that are now selected for (Jovornors will 
 be an unwilling witness to a progressive degeneration of public intelligence 
 in the United States. You can go down into the country or on the sea* 
 shore and yon will lind Americans yet. You will find guides for instance, 
 fishermen and woodcutters and all the great and noble race of God's gentle- 
 men that live outdoors. But around New York and in every other place 
 which has the misfortune to be a city in this country, you find this mixture 
 and crazy conglomeration of races, unblended and incapable of lieing blend- 
 ed; and Mr Hearst and Mr. Pulitzer exist for the purpose of faiuiing into a 
 hotter Hame the crude heat of these barbarians." 
 
 It may very safely be said that all municipal power, in the great 
 cities of the Union, has passed into the hands of foreigners ; and 
 that the genuine American eleinent is nowhere apparent. Little 
 wonder that it developed into Knownothingism and other secret 
 
 * See New York Tribune of July 19, 1895, and the Wiiie and 6'pirU Oazctte 
 about same date. 
 
OF IMIOHIHITION. <)3 
 
 Hoci«^tioH for its own protoction, l)ut i\w forco of nirouinNtnncoa 
 was too imicli for <w(iii tlnme. HiiiHi'tiiig uiider i\w fon'ij^ii iiiIv(m'H(« 
 iiilluciKU', whirh flopriv^ts tlio imtivi* Ain<<i'iciiri of all iiuthority in 
 lii.s owri citit'H, and cfU'ctually burs liiin out from <n'ery niuni(;iptil 
 post, from tlu) baton of the policfuniin to the chair of the Ahlcnnan 
 or the Mayor, the saloon keeper, as the foundation of all liis 
 woes, and all his civic defeats, is hated with an intensity of hatred, 
 beyond the power of language to describe, by disappointed place- 
 less politicians. Not a few of these, as a (h'lniei' resort, presently 
 dov<?lop into temperance lecturtsrs, and love t(» invade our fair 
 hominion, especially \vhenev(;r thei-e is a little money to l)e madii 
 by th(! movement, and there vent all thcur pent-up wrath, prcwluced 
 l)y tli(i vicious state of things (»n their own soil, upon such hai)les8 
 Canadian audi(Mices as ar(Mlis[)osed t<j listen to them, and to their 
 extravagant statennints which usually have v«^ry slender aj)plicu- 
 tion to tiiis country. The retail litjuor vendor in Canada is no 
 foreigner. As a rule he is a loyal subi«!ct, born and bred, of her 
 majesty C^ueen Victoria. He is neither a .socialist, nor an anar- 
 chist, nor an intidel ; but, on the contrary, is usually a (juiet and 
 unobtrusive oiti/.en, and not infi-eijuently a liberal supi)orter of 
 one church or another, lieyond the fact that he .sells li([Uor, and 
 occasionally violates the law, which he has no business to do, (for 
 he can get no corrupt police protection in Canada) there is scarcely 
 any re.semblance between him and the saloon keeper of the; United 
 States. When his t(unperance political foes there get the upper 
 hand of the latter they plunder him without mercy. Lynch- 
 law is then applie<l to every adverse interest without compunction, 
 and without even a hint as to compensation ; and no matter 
 whcitlMM' their owners are ruined or otherwise, down go breweries, 
 and distilleries, and .salo<ms in (!very direction. That is the sort* of 
 moial Lynch-law which our Prohibition cousins over the way 
 administer on their own soil, and that is the sort of moral Lynch- 
 law which their prototypes in Canada, led by Methodist 
 I). D.'s, id (/enus onaip, now seek to appiv at their will, in 
 this presumed land of Britisii law and order an- ""nuine fair play, 
 to their neighbors. In the ten years ending w i December 31st, 
 1895, there were 50,489 murders and homicides committed in tlu! 
 United States, 1,G55 of these were lynchings, which in some cases 
 were intlicteil with a devilish spirit ecjual to the worst refinements 
 of Indian cruelty. For all the.se nmrders, .scarcely equalled in 
 number by the aggregate in all the other Christian countries of the 
 world, only 1,030 of the murderers were executed.* The year 1895 
 shows the heaviest record of murders in any year in the United 
 States, the figures being H,060, of which 160 were lynchings. For 
 these murders otdy 113 paid the extreme penalty of the law. In the 
 the single state of Ohio, which lacks a full million of the population 
 of Canr.da, the number of Divorces granted by the courts in 1896 
 was 2,973, out of 7,157 cases standing for trial. Decrees were 
 * See the New York IVorkl Almanac, page 216, 
 
64 GENERAL REVIEW 
 
 refused in 1,021 cases, and 3,163 cases are still pending. *In the 
 whole of Canada, during the same year, only one Divorce case was 
 adjudicated upon. At least twenty thousand Divorce decrees 
 were made in the whole United States in 1896. With what 
 justice may it be said to the Prohibition lecturers, who come 
 from this land of murder, and spoliation, and wrong-doing, that 
 their services are required to an infinitely greater extent in their 
 own country, than in our law-abiding land, where so far there 
 have been no lynchings, few murders, and no Lynch-law plunder- 
 ing of brewers, or distillers, or wine-making agriculturists. " The 
 Liquor Problem " iterates and reiterates the fact, that Prohibition 
 in the United States is merely the football of politicians. The 
 figures of almost every elelstion, Presidental, State or Municipal, 
 are amply corroborative of this statement. In the Presidential 
 election of 1896 the total vote cast was 13,579,638, out of which 
 the vote for the Prohibition candidate was only 80,160, against 
 262,799 in 1892. In Maine, out of a total Presidential vote, in 
 1896, of 115,153, only 1,570 were cast for the Prohibition candi- 
 date. In Iowa, the exemplar Prohibition state of the south-west, 
 the total vote at the last Presidential election was 521,547. The 
 Prohibition candidate received 3,192 votes against 6,402 in 1892. 
 In Kansas, another Prohibition state, the total Presidential vote 
 was 336,124 ; the Prohibition candidate got 1,921 votes. In South 
 Carolina, where the state government seeks to promote temperance, 
 by taking the sale of liquor into its own hands under what is termed 
 the Dispensary System, the total vote cast at the Presidential elec- 
 tion of 1896 was 68,907. The great majority of this vote went to 
 Bryan and free silver, and not a single vote was polled for the 
 Prohibition candidate. In New York State, which is all under 
 tHte license system, the whole vote at the la.st Presidential election 
 was 1,423,896, out of which 16,052 were cast for the Prohibition 
 candidate. These figures show, in the most conclusive way, the 
 small amount of true temperance principle existing in the United 
 States, and how completely Prohibition is made the tool of politicians. 
 With all these incontrovertible facts and figures before us, the 
 conclusion must irresistibly force itj^cii upon the minds of every 
 thoughtful and impartial person, that Prohibition does not prohibit 
 to any beneficial extent. They also show that Prohibition does 
 not educate the masses to be more sober, or more moral otherwise ; 
 but, on the contrary, increases intemperance at every possible 
 opportunity, and is promotive of perjury and contempt for t!:e 
 law. They further show that the morality, the true temperance 
 principle, the social comfort, and the general happiness and pros- 
 perity of the people at large, are much more secure under a good 
 license law, honestly administered, than under Prohibition. What 
 supreme folly, accordingly, would the people of Canada be guilty 
 of, were they to place themselves under a yoke which must bring 
 to them infinite disaster and woe, socially, morally and financially. 
 
 * Appleton's Cyclopiedia for 1896. 
 
OF PROHIBITION. 65 
 
 A few words more ere we lay down our pen. We do not ask our 
 readers to take the facts and figures, which we have submitted for 
 their consideration, witliout a complete scrutiny on their part. Our 
 chief object is to stimulate the fullest enquiry into every branch of 
 the Prohibition question we have discussed in these pages, and to 
 help them to form their own sober conclusions thereupon. Did we 
 desire to make money, we could easily have expanded this pamph- 
 let into a good-sized volume, but as our chief object is to educate 
 the people generally upon a large and vital question, as regards 
 their future well-being, we prefer to condense our facts and argu- 
 ments into the smallest possible compass so that they might be 
 well within reach of everybody. We now leave the case we have 
 presented for consideration to the impartial verdict of the Public. 
 
 APPENDIX. 
 
 (From the Toronto Globe of March 17th, 1897.) 
 About four years ago a " Committee of Fifty," a voluntary 
 organization of public-spirited men, began a scientific investigation 
 of the liquor problem in the United States. The committee was 
 the outgrowth of an organization called the " Sociological Group," 
 which had been for about eight years investigating various problems 
 of social welfare. The liquor traffic is so entangled with com- 
 mercial interests, Governmental finances, national prejudices, social 
 usages and religious opinions, that an investigation could be 
 carried on only by the voluntary effort of men of independent mind 
 and high character. One of the principal lines of iuquiiv was the 
 result of legislative interference and regulation. It was undertaken 
 by President Eliot of Harvard University, President Low of 
 Columbia University, and Mr. James C. Carter o^' New York. In 
 1894 this committee sent out a number of trained investigators 
 who worked for two years in eight States, each of which has 
 different liquor laws. Their report has been published by Houghton. 
 Mifflin & Co., and will no doubt be studied by all who take an in 
 telligent interest in liquor legislation. The fact most strongly 
 emphasized by the investigators is the corruption everywhere 
 brought into local politics by liquor laws. The corruption is not 
 always in proportion to the severity of the laws, but often in pro- 
 portion to the complexity of the legal machinery for their enforce- 
 ment, and always in proportion to the laxity of public sentiment 
 behind the laws. Maine has the worst record in political corrup- 
 tion in communities where public sentiment has not supported the 
 prohibition amendment to the constitution. One result recorded 
 by the investigators is *' a full-blown hypocrisy," which is " no- 
 where so blatant as in the legislative halls." The law has banished 
 breweries and distilleries from the State, but the report says 
 "there is no evidence that it has diminished the consumption of 
 alcoholic drinks." Among the evil results of the prohibitory en- 
 actment are " bribes, hufeh-money and assessments for political 
 
66 • APPENDIX. 
 
 purposes," " used to corrupt the lower courts, the police aclminis- 
 tration, politicul organizations and even the electorate itself," " a 
 whole generation of habitual law-breakers, schooled in evasion and 
 shainelessness," " officers of the law double-faced and mercenary," 
 " office-holders urifaithful to pledges" and " courts ineffective 
 through fluctuations in policy, delays, perjuries, negligences." The 
 same phenomena were found in Iowa under prohibitory laws. On 
 the other hand, it is pointed out that the motives of the prohibi- 
 tionists were good, and that many benefits have resulted from 
 prohibitory enactments. 
 
 Under the State dispensary system of South Carolina another 
 kind of political evil has developed. An army of State constables 
 and storekeepers has been created, and lias naturally developed into 
 an almost invincible party machine with all the evil influences of 
 machine political elements. As is common with such legislation, 
 the results were diametrically opposite to the expectations. It was 
 thought it would restrict drinking in rural districts, though per- 
 haps not in towns ; the result was a distinct lessening of drinking 
 in towns, while intemperance increased in the country. Tiie report 
 declares that no American legislation has been effective in remov- 
 ing the motive of private gain from the traffic. Measured by 
 freedom from political corruption, the simple tax law of Ohio was 
 found the best of the eight States investigated. Under that law 
 the traffic is not licensed but simply taxed. A man's opportunity 
 for engaging in the traffic does not depend on favors bought or 
 obtained, but simply on the payment of his tax. There are few 
 chances for political corruption, and no false sentiments can creep 
 in where the revenue feature is treated with so much frankness. 
 With regard to the promotion of temperance hibits, the committee 
 has not found that " any one kind of temperance legislation has 
 been more successful than another." Different conniiunities achieve 
 success with different systems, much depending on local public 
 sentiment and sincerity in the execution of the law. It has been 
 found that in very few towns and cities has the economic limit of 
 license fees been reached. In Boston the fees were doubled, and 
 again increased within a period of Ave years, yet there was no dimin- 
 ution in the number of applicants for licenses. A wide margin 
 between the economic value of a license, due to restricting the 
 number issued, and the fees charged is a fruitful source of corrup- 
 tion. The revenue-producing capacity is enormous before the limit 
 is reached at which illicit traffic becomes a serious encroachment. — 
 The report asserts thajb attempts at prohibition^ have proved vicious 
 failures, except in small towns adjacent to great cities, and in small 
 conununities in which pi-ohibition sentiment was almost unanimous. 
 The best results have been secired by restrictive laws, which impose 
 heavy taxes and reduce the number of saloons, confining them to 
 certain localities, separating them from other lines of business and 
 imposing all possible publicity, such as the anti-screen law of 
 Massachusetts. Local enactments fully 'supported by local senti- 
 
APPENDIX. 67 
 
 mont are rogardod as the most effectual method of imposing re- 
 strictions on tlie traffic. 
 
 (From the Montrml Gazette April 17th, 1897). 
 
 In the year 1 889 a number of American students of social questions 
 began the prepai-ation of papers or essays dealing with sociological 
 subjects. There was at first fifteen thus engaged, and in order to assure 
 the accuracy and increase the value of the studies, whatever was 
 written by any member of the quindecemvirate was submitted for 
 comment and, if necessary, for revision, to all the rest. They were 
 then published in reviews or magazines for the benefit ofthe public 
 at large. Among the subjects discussed by the original group were 
 labor reform, church unity and the government of cities, and among 
 the writers were Prof. Richard T. Ely, Dr. Charles W. Shields and 
 President Seth Low. The members were all of national, state or local 
 prominence, and the subjects were all live topics that had a practical 
 interest for millions of men. This fact having been recognized by 
 the attention which the successive publications attracted, it was 
 thought advisable, four years after the primary organization, to en- 
 large the membership by the admission of 3") other students of prac- 
 tical sociology. The group, having been placed on this enlarged basis, 
 determined to concentrate all its ititellectual and moral energies on 
 the same theme, instead of dividing its forces. The first enquiry that 
 the group o^ fifty undertook was a thorough examination of the 
 liquor problem. First of all, the whole membership was consti- 
 tuted a committee. The majoi'ity consisted of residents in the 
 Eastern States, but the West was not without representation, and 
 tlie South had cor' 'buted a small but influential delegation. The 
 entire committee first met in New York on the 20th October, 1893, 
 and appointed four sub-committees on different aspects of the drink 
 problem — physiological, legislative, economic and ethical. Each of the 
 sub-committees at once set to work on j;he investigation committed to 
 it. On the lOtli of January, 1896, it was voted in committee of the 
 whole flfty, that the reports of any of the sub-committees might be 
 published, but always on the express condition that it should be 
 given to be understood that such reports were preliminary in 
 their nature and only contributory to the general discussion to 
 be undertaken afterwards by the committee in its entirety. The 
 flrst sub-committee to avail itself of this permission is that on the 
 legislative aspects of the liquor problem, the report of which has 
 just been published by Messrs. Houghton, Mifflin & Co. We are 
 told at the outset that the sub-committee, having received from the 
 committee of fifty appropriations, amounting to $6,500, engaged 
 Dr. Fred. H. Wines and Mr. John Koren to investigate the work- 
 ing of the liquor laws in several states of the Union. In the State 
 of Maine, where prohibition has existed since 1851, Mr. Koren be- 
 gan work in May, 1894, enquiring into the operation of the law 
 
68 APPENDIX. 
 
 and its results. He then studied the working of local option in 
 Massachusetts ; that of the license l;uv of Pennsylvania, and that 
 of the dispensary system in South Carolina. Then, having care- 
 fully written out his notes in four separate reports, he devoted six 
 weeks to a supplementary survey of the field in Pennnsylvania, — 
 Dr. Wines began his enquiry in August, 1894, in Missouri, mainly 
 in St. Louis, he then went to Iowa, and afterwards to Ohio, where 
 the so-called mulct law is in force, and finally gave considerable 
 attention to the operation of the liquor laws of Indiana. Altogether 
 the enquiry thus conducted by these well known experts covered 
 eight types of liquor legislation. * * 
 
 It is conceded that prohibitory legislation has failed to exclude 
 intoxicants completely even from districts where public sentiment 
 is favourable to it When public opinion is adverse to prohibition, 
 or strongly divided, the traffic in alcoholic drinks, though some- 
 times repressed or harrassed, has never been exterminated or 
 rendered unprofitable. In Maine and Iowa there have " always 
 been counties and municipalities in complete and successful re- 
 bellion against the law." As for the passion for drink, it has 
 remained unsubdued — and the resentment of interference thence 
 arising " will forever prompt resistance to all restrictive legisla- 
 tion." Nor does prohibitory legislation fail to be attended by 
 conditions that have an evil effect on public opinion by diminishing ^^^f 
 
 " respect for courts, judicial procedure, oaths, and law in general," 
 as well as for the "officers of the law, legislators and public servants." 
 The following passage is full of significance : " The^ public have 
 seen law defied, a whole generation of habitual law-breakers school- 
 ed in evasion and sharaelessness, courts ineffective through fluc- 
 tuations of policy, delays, perjuries, negligences, and other 
 miscarriages of justice, officers of the law double-faced and mercen- 
 ary, legislators timid and insincere, candidates for office hypocritical 
 and truckling, and office-holders unfaithful to pledges and to 
 reasonable public expectation. * * * The liquor traffic, being 
 very profitable, has been able, when attacked by prohibitory legis- 
 lation, to pay fines, bribes, hush-money, and assessments for political 
 purposes to large amounts. This money has tended to corrupt the 
 law courts, the police administration, political organisations, and 
 even the electorate itself." The result of yielding to these tempta- 
 tions by candidates for and holders of office is " a general degenera- 
 tion of public life," " a contempt for the public service," which is 
 thus made " less desirable for upright men." In fine, the spectacle 
 of certain conspicuous details of the operation or quasi-operation of 
 the law is " demoralizing to society at large." 
 
 But have not the " efforts at prohibition reduced the consumption 
 of intoxicants and diminished drunkenness ?" In seeking an answer 
 to these questions it was found that " opinions differ widely," and 
 that no demonstration on either of these points has been reached 
 or is now obtainable, after more than forty years of observation 
 and experience." 
 
I 
 
 /