r 
 
 s^. 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 VHMmm^. 
 
 
 PholDgrapnic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WfST MAIN STRUT 
 
 WltSTIR,N.Y. UStO 
 
 ( 71* ) 172-4303 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/iCIVIH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
i^^>>^.;.?'i»i 
 
 Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommagde 
 
 □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurte et/ou peliicul^e 
 
 □ Cover title missing/ 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 I I Coloured maps/ 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Cartes g^ographiques en cculeur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 ReliA avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serr6e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intArieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 11 se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouttes 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 male, lorsque cela Atait possible, ces pages n'oi.: 
 pas At6 film^es. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppi^mentaires; 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le mellleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la m6thode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquAs ci-dessous. 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 □ Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagtes 
 
 I I Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 n 
 
 Pages restaurtos et/ou pellicul6es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages dAcolortes, tachet6es ou piqu6es 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d6tach6es 
 
 I I Showthrough/ 
 
 Transparence 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 Quality in^gale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel suppl^mentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Mition disponible 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont M film^es d nouveau de fapor: A 
 obtenir la mellleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film^ au taux de reduction indiquA ci-dessous 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i>< 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 
 
 
 16X 
 
 
 
 
 20X 
 
 
 
 24X 
 
 
 
 
 28X 
 
 
 
 
 32X 
 
 
 «iaMM0g 
 
 kliliMMail 
 
 mmmm 
 
'6 
 
 6tail8 
 IS du 
 nodifier 
 ir une 
 ilmage 
 
 The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 Library of Congress 
 Photoduplication Service 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in iceeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grAce d la 
 gAn6rosit6 de: 
 
 Library of Congress 
 Photoduplication Service 
 
 Les images sulvantes ont 6t6 reproduces avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetA de l'exemplaire filmd, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or Illustrated Impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or Illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated Impression. 
 
 les 
 
 Les exemplaires orlginaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est ImprlmAe sont filmfo en commengant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernlAre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 orlginaux sont filmte en commen^ant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol ^^> (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or the symbol y (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaftra sur la 
 dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbols ^^ signlfie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols ▼ signlfie "FIN". 
 
 e 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be vilmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included In one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 filmte d des taux de reduction diffArents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul clichA, 11 est filmA A partir 
 de I'angle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mAthode. 
 
 / errata 
 id to 
 
 It 
 
 ie peiure. 
 
 QOT'i A 
 
 U 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
 mmmmmmmmiiutti 
 
 ••«HkHiHaMIM«MitM 
 
 '"""'''"' *rt)|iil 
 


 c 
 
 vvia 
 
 » .( ft" -<^'W* 
 
 ! •-.I.it^ 
 
 1^ 
 
 >f//^(/>fA Address 
 
 OF THE 
 
 President of the American Society 
 for Ps/cftical Researcfi. 
 
 JANUARY 12, 1886. 
 
 I 
 
ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT. 
 
 It might naturally be expected that in addressing you on the 
 present occasion your president should enter into an account 
 of work done and results gained. There are, however, difficul- 
 ties in the way of doing this in a satisfactory way. It has been 
 my misfortune to reside so far from the seat of the society, that 
 I have not been able to take that active part in your work 
 which would have been appropriate to my office. Moreover, so 
 far as I have followed this work, it would seem that up to the 
 present time it consists more in preliminary efforts, and prepara- 
 tions for further research, than in finished experiments leading 
 to establish conclusions. Under such circumstances, the ques- 
 tion in what direction our efforts should tend is a most impor- 
 tant one ; and I shall, therefore, ask your permission to enter 
 into a discussion of the general aspect and relations of the 
 subject. 
 
 Looking at the situation from the most general point of view, 
 the first* question to present itself would be : Why are we here? 
 what is our field of work ? We might reply in a way equally 
 general, that we are investigating^those obscure mental phe- 
 nomena which do not seem to accord with the laws of mental 
 action as ordinarily apprehended through the experience of the 
 race. We are more particularly concerned with a large class of 
 sporadic, but well-known phenomena, which seem to indicate 
 that the mind may possess certain susceptibilities outside the 
 limits which experience teaches us is commonly imposed upon 
 its powers. 
 
 We are perfectly familiar with a certain system of inter- 
 action between mind and matter. Every instance of voluntary 
 motion, and every instance of a mental effect produced by an 
 external cause, is a case of such inter-action. Taking any one 
 mind, we may consider it either as an agent producing effects 
 external to itself by the action of the will, or as an object acted 
 upon by external causes. Now, a very wide induction from 
 general experience shows us that this inter-action is, in our 
 ordinary experience, subject to the foUowirig restrictions : — 
 
 Firstly, no individual mind can be acted upon except through 
 
II 
 
 Addresn of the. Prenident, 
 
 the medium of a material organism with which it is associated. 
 The external cause, whatever it may be, must act on the organ- 
 ization itself in order that the mind may either be excited to 
 consciousness, or affected in any other way. Moreover, the 
 action of such external causes is a physical process, subject to 
 purely physical laws. 
 
 Secondly, the mind cannot act upon any thing external to 
 itself, except through the agency of its material organism ; and, 
 this organism being set iu action, the effect is subject to purely 
 physical laws. 
 
 Both of these laws are strikingly illustrated in our every- 
 day experience. For example, if a living organism is left 
 unsupported, it will fall exactly like dead matter, in spite of 
 any thing the mind can do to stop it. When supjiorted, it 
 presses upon the support with a force equal to the weight of 
 the matter composing it ; and no effort of the will can increase 
 or diminish this pressure. Two persons in each other's neigh- 
 borhood cannot be conscious of each other's existence except 
 through t^ J physical medium of light, sound, or material mo- 
 tion, produced by one and acting upon the organism of tlie 
 other. By no act of the will can we produce motion or any 
 other change in an external object unless we set in operation a 
 sufficient physical force through the medium of our organism. 
 These, I say, are hypothetical laws, and may be regarded as 
 conclusions from general experience. They are, however, like 
 all other general laws, in seeming disaccord with occasional 
 phenomena. It is these sporadic phenomena with which we are 
 mainly concerned, and which we desire to subject to some form 
 of law. If mind is not subject to the restrictions which have 
 been just defined, we have a mental actio in distav^ which is 
 variously known as '•• thought-transference," " telt^ui' 'ly," and 
 "mind-reading." Granting this apparent actio in d.stans, we 
 may either suppose it real, or attribute it to some unrecognized 
 physical agency. This question will, however, arise at a later 
 period in our researches. The main question with which we 
 are now concerned is. Can one mind influence another in any 
 other way than through the action of known physical causes 
 acting between and through their respective organisms? If 
 this question is answered in the afiinnatiye, thou a great di»- 
 
 I 
 
V 
 
 
 ',' 
 
 Addreaa of the President. 
 
 oovery is made, opening up a new field, not only of research, 
 but of philosophical speculiition and of practical application. 
 If answered in the negative, our work is not done, because we 
 then have to explain the sporadic phenomena which seem to 
 indicate thought-transference. 
 
 Let us begin by looking at the question from its two sides, 
 beginning with the affirmative one. If we consider the current 
 of our mental processes while sitting listlessly at our desks, we 
 may find our minds to wander in u half-unconscious way from 
 one subject to another. Vague emotions of various kinds may 
 arise without our being able to assign any reason for .iicm. 
 We may feel elated without being conscious of any agreeable 
 event to cause elation, and depressed without having heard any 
 evil tidings. The visual image of absent friends, or the thought 
 of an exciting scene which has been before us, may arise un- 
 bidden. Memories follow each other without any apparent logi- 
 cal order. Ideas come and go as if of their own accord. 
 
 That these mental impressions are all results of sufficient 
 causes, is a conclusion so instinctive that we can feel no doubt 
 of its truth, and therefore shall take it for granted. The first 
 question which arises is whether the causes are all contained, 
 consciously or unconsciously, within the organism ; or whether 
 they may operate and produce their effect through it from 
 outside, without the mediation of the organism. Considering 
 the subject apart from our general experience of the world, 
 there does not seem to be any reason, a priori, why we should 
 admit one of these hypotheses rather than the other. The 
 belief that the impressions of distant friends or relatives are in 
 some way reproduced in our minds, is one generally entertained 
 in infancy. Neither to the infant nor to the adult mind need 
 the question, how can such impressions be conveyed from mind 
 to mind, cause any more difficulty than the question how a 
 body millions of miles away can exert force upon a ball in my 
 hand. If we know by experience that the force is exerted, that 
 must satisfy us. The discovery of the medium, if any, by 
 which the effect is produced, is a different and independent 
 problem. 
 
 The mental operations alluded to may be rationally attrib- 
 uted> not only to the action of distant minds known to us, but 
 
 . 
 
AddreM of the Premlent. 
 
 to that of minds otherwise totiilly unknown. It ia not uncom- 
 niou iiniong some chisses to attribute those vurying mentul 
 states wliich they cannot otherwise account for to the action of 
 intelligences in another and invisible sphere. From a scientiiio 
 point of view, the whole question is an open one, except so far 
 as it may have been settled by observation and experiment. 
 
 The opinion that a mind can act where the organism is not 
 is one which we know to have been held in one form or another 
 by men in all ages. In it originates the belief in the possession 
 of miraculous powei-s by gifted beings. Indeed, were we asked 
 what is the distinguishing mark of the conception of a miracle, 
 as it exists ii} the mind of a believer, we might reply by saying 
 that it is the belief that certain gifted persons possess the 
 power of producing effects through the immediate agency of 
 their minds, without bringing into action any sufficient physical 
 cause. Although the belief in the possibility of such a power 
 is stronger and more general among the lower races, we cannot 
 say that men of any race or degree of intelligence are wholly 
 free from it. From his own observations the writer believes 
 that one-third of the intelligent people of his acquaintance in 
 England and America are more oi less under its influence. 
 The fact that the majority of the soundest thinkers not only do 
 not accept the opinion, but look upon it with a greater or less 
 degree of contempt, as an evidence of mental weakness, exerts 
 a repressive effect upon its free expression, and thus diminishes 
 its apparent prevalence. 
 
 The speaker distinctly remembers the development of his 
 own ideas on the subject in childhood. Remarks dropped in 
 the conversation of others, coupled with a deep feeling of the 
 wide range of possibilities involved in the universe so newly 
 opened to his mind, led him to grasp with some eagerness at 
 the idea that impressions might be conveyed from one sym- 
 pathetic mind to another at great distances. But continued 
 observation never showed the slightest connection between his 
 own mental states and those of his friends or relatives. One 
 attempt to put the supposed law to a practical use is still dis- 
 tinctly remembered. He set out for a schoolhouse where his 
 father (the teacher) usually remained a short time after school 
 to read. He was extremely desirous of reaching his father be- 
 
 
1 
 
 I 
 
 Addreaa of the Prenident, 
 
 fore the latter ahniild leave, and tlien fore exerted himself to tlia 
 utmost to concentrate his desires on the father in hucIi niiiiinttr 
 as to induce him to remain. Arrived at tlie Hchooihoiise. he 
 found him still there, hut just ahnut to leave. The hoy intpiired 
 dili^^ently of the father whetht r he had felt any unusual disposi- 
 tion to remain. 'Die reply was, that he hu<l remained only to 
 finish what he had just been reading, and that he liad felt no 
 impression whatever tending to make him stay. The natural 
 conclusion was adverse to what is now called telepathy, and it 
 may he Mupposed that the majority of thin King men reach the 
 same conclusion in much the same way. 
 
 When we look carefully into the subject, we find that the 
 general course of experience teuds in this direction. The fact 
 that many drugs stimulate in the highest degree the mental 
 processes which I have sought to describe, gives color to the 
 view that their origin is not without the organism. In our 
 common life-experience we find that one mind acts on another 
 only through the medium of physical causes emanating from one 
 organism and reaching the other. It is quite true that the con- 
 necting link may be so delicate as almost to evade recognition. 
 Shades of feeling in one mind are made known to another by 
 changes in the countenance so slight and delicate as to entirely 
 evade description. But the medium of communication is al- 
 ways present in the light, which, reflected from one face, paints 
 its image on the retina of the eye. This is shown very conclu- 
 sively by the fact, that, if the room is darkened, the one will cease 
 to be conscious of the feelings of the other. We also find that 
 it is not at all necessary to the conveyance of intelligence by 
 such connecting physical causes that the person receiving the 
 intelligence, or otherwise acted upon, should be conscious of it. 
 He may have no more conception of the mode of action than 
 the opium-eater has of the causes of his visions. 
 
 If thought-transference really exists, it has hitherto failed in 
 the case where its agency has been most urgently required by 
 society. A man on trial for murder knows well whether he has 
 or has not done the deed ; and his mind is agitated by im- 
 pressions, which, could they be conveyed to those who sur- 
 round him, would settle the question of his guilt or innocence. 
 Yet no case has yet arisen where judge or jury have been con- 
 
' I 
 
 AdiJreHH of the Prenideid. 
 
 Hcious of any meiitnl effect ciiused by tho trnriKfer of iinpres- 
 Hioiirt fi-oin tlie rniiul of tliu pri.sonor which couUl help thiMii to 
 deuiile thin <iue»tioii. In great cities we Me Hurrouiideil by 
 many thouHaniU of our feHow-nion in every Htuge of mental 
 excitement. Yet, if we close our eyes »ind eiirs, we are wholly 
 unuonscious of any impression which we can truce to cmaiuitions 
 proceeding from their minds. 
 
 But a conclusion thus reached is not necessarily beyond fur- 
 ther investigation. We must admit, tlmt, until the formation 
 of our parent society in England, no one ever undertook ex- 
 haustive experiments to determine whether there is or is not 
 any such action. If the action in question is weak, obscure, or 
 rare, it might well elude the rough tests which have hitherto 
 been applied. The undoubted fact that tho belief is generally 
 found in very bad company, though suspicious, is not conclu- 
 sive. The phenomena of hypnotism afford an excellent illus- 
 tration of an analagous case. It must be admitted that these 
 phenomena have always been found in very bad company. 
 From this fact alone they scarcely received any attention finu 
 investigators for nearly a century; and many rejected them as 
 spurious, or as the result of collusion between the operator and 
 his subject. But, when once taken up in a scientific spirit, a 
 hew condition of the nervous system was discovered, the re- 
 sults of which upon our knowledge we cannot yet foresee. 
 
 We must not overlook another side of the case. The theo- 
 ries which the performers presented to the public, and by which 
 they professed to explain the phenomena, were as false and as 
 spurious as any one had ever supposed them. There was oidy 
 a residuum of truth at the bottom of a great mass of fraudu- 
 lent pretension. Yet that residuum was well worth collecting. 
 
 The conclusion which an unbiassed mind should take of the 
 subject, in advance of any investigation or evidence, seems to be 
 this: Leaving out all theories founded on any supposed rela- 
 tion of the mind to the nervous system, there can be no sound 
 reason for denying the possibility of mental action at a dis- 
 tance. At the same time, the probabilities of the case are 
 against it. As it is always best to bet against any individual 
 horse winning a race, or any single number occurring at a turn 
 of the roulette table, so it is sound to consider .the probabilities 
 
Addretn of (he Preitident, 
 
 of tlie case to be agiiiiist imy Hcientilic theory of the cIush ve- 
 lerreil to. In other wonb, llie burden of proot w on the siile 
 of the affirmative. 
 
 On this side we have a mass of evidence so great that we 
 cannot deal with it in detail, unless our task is facilitated by 
 reference to those logical principles which should direct our 
 thoughts. In order to avoid employing these principles in too 
 abstract a form, I shuU borrow them directly from our common- 
 sense methods of drawing conclusiojis in every-day life. It is, 
 however, necessary to lay bare tlie frame-work which underlies 
 these methods, and in doing this I must ask your close atten- 
 tion for a few moments. 
 
 Every explanation of natural phonomena, when complete, 
 involves two elements, — a general law and a particular fact. 
 The former may, and nearly always is, taken for granted as too 
 well known to need statement. And, in fact, the ordinary 
 mind, how much soever intluenced by it, seldom comprehends 
 it with entire clearness. Yet it must exist in the intellect, 
 consciously or unconsciously. 
 
 Walking in the fields, I hear a sharp explosion. I explain it 
 by the fact that some one has fired a gun. In doing this, I 
 assume the general law that the firing of a gun causes an explo- 
 sive sound. To one unacquainted with this general fact, the 
 statement that a gun had been fired would afford no adequate 
 explanation. He would see no connection between the sound 
 he had heard, and my statement that it was caused by firing a 
 gun, until he apprehended the general law. 
 
 Sitting at your desk on a sultry aiternoon, you find the air 
 gradually growing dark. A flash of light suddenly illuminates 
 the room. The explanation which at once presents itself is 
 ti at the .darkness is caused by a thunder-cloud, and that the 
 flflsh is the result of an electric discharge in the cloud. Here 
 you have in mind the general laws, that a thunder-cloud cuts 
 off a large part of the solar light, and that an electric discharge 
 produces a brilliant flash. If you never knew that an electric 
 discharge produced a flash, the explanation would fail. But 
 the supposition of the particular fact that a cloud is passing at 
 the moment is equally necessary to the explanation. 
 
 I need not stop to point out how the general laws necessary 
 

 ni 
 
 Addreas of the President. 
 
 to the explanation of natural phenomena are inferred by induc- 
 tion. Every rational mind, in the course of its development, 
 may be said to apprehend, consciously or unconsciously, a con- 
 tinual increasing number of \a\rs of nature. Perhaps the qual- 
 ification " rational " may not here be required. It may be said 
 that all the higher animals reach a conception of such laws, 
 and that the only difference is that the irrational animals enter- 
 tain this conception unconsciously, while rational minds enter- 
 tain it consciously, and can separate it from that of the special 
 facts in which it is exhibited. 
 
 The main fact which I wish to illustrate by this digression is 
 that every mind, in the course of its development, is modifying 
 or adding to its conceptions of the laws of nature. The higher 
 order of minds continually group the laws apprehended by 
 minds of a lower order, under some mora general laws ; and it 
 is in this grouping that scientific progress consists. We may 
 say that all the laws apprehended by the common man are 
 grouped by the scientific theorizer under more general laws. 
 In the common mind, there are a great number of laws of 
 nature determining the occurrence of physical pain or pleas- 
 ure, heat, cold, blows, contact with acids, disease, injuries. 
 In the cultivated mind, this complex system of laws assumes 
 the form of a few more general and simple laws. But how 
 far soever the work of generalizing laws may be carried, they 
 can never be applied to the explanation of phenomena without 
 evoking eome special fact, or system of facts, to which they 
 
 apply. 
 
 It follows, that, when a phenomenon is presented to us which 
 we find it difficult or impossible to explain, we must conclude, 
 either that we have some new law of nature to apprehend, or 
 that some particular facts which we do not see are present to 
 modify the action of known laws. Whether our difficulties 
 arise from ignorance of the law or of the fact, is a question 
 which in some cases involves great difficulty, while in others 
 the mind settles it without question. The untutored man, who 
 for the first time sees iron in a state of fusion, learns correctly 
 the (to him) new general law that iron is melted by heat. But 
 he may infer a new law when he really has to deal only with a 
 known law, acting through facts which are concealed from him. 
 
■•— * • ■-I'. rif ll f ii .i. il Ji i , 
 
 Address of the President. 
 
 A juggler holds in front of him a dish of water filled with jelly- 
 fish. An assistant having thrown a large handkercliief over 
 the dish, the juggler rolls the handkerchief in a lump ; and ves- 
 sel, water, and fish have all disappeared. A lookerKin might 
 see in this the evidence of some new law of nature, in virtue 
 of wliich a mass of matter could become invisible ; but the bet- 
 ter informed spectator knows that something has been done 
 under the handkerchief which he did not see, and that no new 
 law of nature comes into play. He might find it impossible to 
 explain, even to his own satisfaction, how the disappearance has 
 come about : but this ignorance does not in any way diminish 
 his confidence that the phenomenon can be fully explained by 
 the presence of some particular circumstances of which he is 
 ignorant. 
 
 I hope that the main principle which I wish to enforce will 
 now be clearly apprehended. When a set of phenomena pre- 
 sents themselves to us, apparently defying explanation, we may 
 conclude either that some law of nature of which we have 
 before remained ignorant has come into play, or that the 
 result is due to known laws acting under particular circum- 
 stances of which \vh are ignorant. The whole question of the 
 reality of psychic force is of this kind. We have seen thought 
 transferred from mind to mind. The evidence of the transfer 
 in some cases is beyond doubt. 'Xhe question is. Did it take 
 place through some physical connection between two organisms 
 which eludes our scrutiny, but which, had we seen it, we should 
 have recognized as involving no new principle, or did some new 
 law of nature come into play? Is there any criterion by which 
 we can decide between these two hypotheses? The history of 
 scientific investigation shows that there is. But, before point- 
 ing it out, let us glance at the subject from a slightly different 
 standpoint. 
 
 Phenomena which we are unable to explain at the moment 
 are of almost daily occurrence. Every sound which we hear, 
 and of which we cannot state the origin, belongs to this class. 
 The course of our thoughts, and the internal physical pains 
 so familiar to humanity, frequently belong to the same class. 
 Indeed, the number of particular facts which we do not know 
 is 80 very great, that our natural impulse is always to attribute 
 
Address of the President. 
 
 any inexplicable phenomenon, not to some new law, but to 
 some unknown combination of circumstances. In many cases 
 we call phenomena tlms arising spurious, not because they are 
 unreal, but because we may suspect that circumstances which 
 give rise to them have been intentionally produced to deceive 
 us. The word would, however, bear a connotation which we 
 should avoid applying to the present case without explanation. 
 One very natural way of investigating the question whether 
 inexplicable phenomena belong to the class just mentioned is 
 that followed by our parent society. It consists in carefully 
 investigating all the attendant circumstances with a view of 
 finding whether they afford a sufficient explanation of the phe- 
 nomenon under known laws. If investigation shows the pres- 
 ence of conditions under which the phenomenon could be pro- 
 duced by such laws of nature, it is then assumed that no new 
 law comes into play ; but if the most searching investigation 
 fails to discover any such conditions, then it is to be concluded 
 that a new law of nature is established, with a greater or less 
 degree of probabilit)'. 
 
 Although this method is in perfect accord with our ordinary 
 modes of investigating phenomena involving no new law, yet I 
 must, with all due respect to those who have applied it, express 
 my dissent from its validity as a method of discovering such 
 laws. In fact, it is not in accordance with our every-day habit 
 of inference to infer a new law by this method. I think the 
 following illustration will make this habit clear. 
 
 Let us have presented to us fifty phenomena, all belonging, 
 80 far as we can see at the first glance, to one class, and all 
 apparently inexplicable without assuming some new law. We 
 proceed, however, to investigate, with a view of determining 
 whether they are not the product of circumstances not evident 
 at the moment. Suppose, to fix the ideas, that the separate 
 phenomena are fiftv in number: it matters not whether fifty 
 repetitions of the same thing, or fifty separate occurrences of 
 the same general character, all differing in their details. What 
 connects them together is some element of similarity. They may 
 be produced by one person, or they may show certain likenesses 
 in virtue of which they supposed them explainable by some one 
 new law. 
 
Address of the President. 
 
 We now proceed to investigate. A very little examination 
 shows that twenty of tlieni are tiie product of known causes 
 which we did not at first see. More careful examination, ex- 
 tended through several hours or days, explains twenty more 
 in the same way ; leaving only ten from which to infer a new 
 law. Bringing in new means of investigation, and devoting 
 increased industry to the work, we succeed in exphiiniiig five 
 more, one by one ; leaving yet five which defy our powers. Are 
 we to conclude that these five do not belong to tlie same class 
 as the others, that there cannot possibly be any circumstances 
 m.known to us which have produced them, and that some new 
 law of nature is therefore established ? I think not. I think 
 the man of well-balanced mind in such a case always reasons 
 thus: As first presented to me, these phenomena were all of the 
 same general character. All seemed to point to the existence 
 of a new law of nature. All had the character of individuals 
 claiming that they were not the product of known causes. But, 
 as I went through the investigation, I find that ninety per cent 
 of them had deceived me in various ways by being the product 
 of known causes, concealed from my sight. As some of these 
 hidden causes require little investigation for their discovery, 
 others yet more ; and as my powers of investigation are limited, 
 and I can never be sure that no unknown causes are present, — 
 I therefore conclude that the remaining ten per cent are the 
 product of circumstances which have only the common property 
 of eluding my present powers of investigation. 
 
 This is, in fact, the method of reasoning which we always 
 adopt in every-day life. * We adopt it because we know that 
 circumstances are constantly present, the discovery of which 
 eludes all our powers. No one claims the ability to explain 
 every thing he sees and hears in one day. He knows that un- 
 known causes are continually present, and is satisfied to relegate 
 inexplicable phenomena to their action. Hence, the method of 
 investigation in question can only show satisfactorily our in- 
 ability to discover the true cause, and can never justify us in 
 concluding that a new law of nature comes into play. 
 
 The true method of investigation is exemplified by the whole 
 history of physical science. The general laws of nature are per- 
 permanent : the special circumstances under which they act are 
 

 Addrean of the President. 
 
 continually varying. We see a law only in a sequence of phe- 
 nomena permanent in its character. This system is also in per- 
 fect accord with our common-sense meinod of drawing conclu- 
 sions. When the same phenomenon occurs under the same 
 conditions time after time, we infer a law of nature. Wlien we 
 cannot trace its repetition to any common set of conditions, we 
 conclude that it is due to varying circumstances, perhaps un- 
 known to us. 
 
 It is a characteristic of all scientific progress, that, when we 
 ascertain any new law connecting phenomena, we are able to 
 produce them with continually increasing facility. Take the 
 case of electricity, for example. Before regular experiments 
 were made, electrical phenomena were so little known that they 
 might have been deemed entirely spurious. The early experi- 
 menters met great difficulty in reproducing them at pleasure. 
 Sometimes they appeared, and sometimes they did not. Some- 
 times electricity was conducted from one body to another, and 
 sometimes it was not. But, as investigation went on, there was 
 a regular progress, step by step, until a stage was reached at 
 which all the phenomena could be produced at pleasure, and 
 fully explained by known laws and attendant circumstances. 
 
 How does psychic research stand this test? I think we must 
 all admit, that, up to the present time, it does not stand it at all. 
 The unwelcome fact seems to be that we have absolutely no 
 general knowledge that we did not have ten years ago. We 
 have seen that there is sometimes an apparent transfer of thought, 
 and that impressions are apparently produced from time to 
 time by unknown causes. We knew* this as well before we 
 began our investigation as we do now. If any new law of 
 nature is involved, what is its character? Let us grant that 
 thought is sometimes transferred. What question will then 
 arise ? I reply, that the first question to be considered is under 
 what circurastances and conditions, and by what agencies, is it 
 transferred ? That these circumstances, conditions, or agencies 
 are exceptional, is perfectly obvious. Were they universal and 
 general, our minds would be affected by those of the thousands 
 who surround us. We know that they are not so affected. 
 The whole question, is, therefore, under what conditions are men- 
 tal impressions of any kind communicated from mind to mind 
 
 i 
 
ihe- 
 jer- 
 An- 
 iine 
 we 
 we 
 uu- 
 
 we 
 
 ( to 
 the 
 ;nts 
 hey 
 )eri- 
 ure. 
 mie- 
 aud 
 was 
 1 at 
 and 
 
 oust 
 all. 
 
 r no 
 We 
 
 ght, 
 
 B to 
 
 we 
 V of 
 that 
 then 
 iider. 
 is it 
 icies 
 and 
 ands 
 ;ted. 
 men- 
 nind 
 
 ■*^ \ 
 
 Address of the President. 
 
 without the intervention of known physical causes ? I have 
 carefully studied the proceedings of our parent societ}', as well 
 as articles in magazines describing cases of supposed thought- 
 transference, without being able to find any answer whatever 
 to this question. 
 
 Let us now look more closely into the history of the inves- 
 tigation. As our own work is in some sort a continuance of 
 that of the English society, we may begin by recalling certain 
 extremely interesting experiments of the former, which, if prop- 
 erly followed up, might be expected to lead to a definite con- 
 clusion. 
 
 In the latter part of the year 1882, some members of the 
 society learned through Mr. Douglas Blackburn, an associate, 
 that a mesmerist of Brighton, named Smith, had the power of 
 describing impressions existing in Mr. Blackburn's mind. After 
 some tests of this power, it was found that Mr. Smith could 
 copy a drawing of which it was supposed he had no knowledge, 
 except as it existed in Mr. Blackburn's memory. In copying 
 the drawings, the " percipient," Mr. Smith, sat at a tsible, blind- 
 folded, while behind him sat the "agent," Mr. Blackburn, 
 thinking intently on the form of the drawing as he had just 
 seen it. Very soon Mr. Smith began to make a copy of the 
 drawing so like the original that no doubt could exist of a 
 relation between the two. This copying of drawings was prac- 
 tised in December, 1882, in Brighton, and again for three or 
 four days during the following month in London. 
 
 It was afterwards found that two young ladies in a large 
 drapery establishment in Liverpool possessed a similar power; 
 and reports on them were made to the society by their em- 
 ployer, Mr. Malcolm Guthrie, J.P., and by Professor Lodge. 
 In some respects these trials are more complete than those 
 made with Mr. Smith, since a number of pefsons seem to have 
 acted successfully as agents. Out of a total of one hundred 
 and fifty drawings, only sixteen are given ; so that the data for 
 deducing any law bearing upon the subject are entirely wanting. 
 These copies of drawings have a great advantage over ver- 
 bal descriptions, in that the record can be made the subject .*' 
 future study. It was found that the three or fouj persons abie 
 to copy invisible drawings were also able, as we may well sup- 
 
i 
 
 AJdreftH of the President. 
 
 pose, to describe invisible objects. It is tlifncult to see how one 
 could draw an object unless be luid some conception of it in bis 
 mind, and witb tins conception he should be able to describe it. 
 There was also one interesting case of an apparently marvel- 
 lous power of naming objects thought of by others. The Rev. 
 A. M. Creery discovered that his four little girls, as well as a 
 waiting-maid in his family, possessed this power in a remarkable 
 degree. A child being sent out of the room, an object to be 
 thought of was agreed upon by the company, or a card was 
 drawn from a pack and passed around. On being called back 
 to the room, the child was very soon able to name the card or 
 object. What is yet more wonderful, the power was not con- 
 fined to merely mateiial objects, but extended to the guessing 
 of numbers and names which could convey no definite idea to 
 a child's mind. Judging from the number of reports made 
 about these children, it would seem that some definite conclu- 
 sion might have been hoped for. 
 
 The question which now arises is. Does all this prove that in 
 this case thought was transferred from one person to another 
 without the interventicm of previously recognized agencies? 
 The principles I have already enunciated will lead us to answer 
 this question in the negative. All investigation of this kind 
 should assume in advance that the phenomena which we observe 
 ^e the result of certain causes, or are associated with certain 
 conditions; and that when these causes or conditions are repro- 
 duced, the phenomenon will recur. Until these causes or con- 
 ditions are discovered, nothing can be inferred. 
 
 What science concerns itself with is not the mere recurrence 
 of the phenomena, but the nature of the relation between the 
 cause and the effect. Such isolated facts as that some particu- 
 lar man in the fifteenth century got well of a disease after a 
 priest had laid hands upon him, or that a little girl at a certain 
 time guessed a card she did not see, are in themselves of no sci- 
 entific interest or importance, however well they may be fitted 
 to excite our curiosity. What we want to discover is the 
 invariable relation by which every sick man of a definable class, 
 upon whom the right kind of a priest lays his hands, shall be 
 cured ; and to discover all the conditions under which a little 
 girl can name a card. Until these conditions can be discovered, 
 
 ijmmmmmsi... 
 
 - atinW-i 
 
AddreHM of the Prttttident. 
 
 \ 
 
 we have no right to attribute the result to one cause rather 
 than to another. It is true that we have not the right to 
 demand tliat every little girl shall he able to name the eard 
 under the given conditions. There may be only one girl out 
 of a thousand, or only one out of a million, who possesses the 
 required power, just as there is only one man out of a thousand 
 who can integrate a differential equation. At the same tune, 
 tiie cases must be numerous enough to niake them a subject of 
 some kind of investigation, and to deduce from them a state- 
 ment of some kind of general law. The rarer they are, the 
 greater the attention that should be devoted to them when 
 found. 
 
 Again, in the case of the drawings, as well as in the other cases, 
 the same question arises. We have given, an " agent " A, and 
 a '* percipient " P. It is found that au impression of some sort 
 is conveyed from A to P. What we want to know is, how it 
 is conveyed. When we can answer this question, we shall be 
 able to say whether a new theory of mind is to be established. 
 To find how it is conveyed, the very first step is to determine 
 by experiment the laws «)f conveyance ; that is, the conditions 
 necessary and sufficient to the transmission. The first ques- 
 tions which would arise might be the following : — 
 
 Whether the power on the part of A diminishes with the 
 distance from P ; and, if so, according to what apparent law? 
 
 Whether at any given distance the relative position of the 
 two parties affects the result? 
 
 Whether the interventicm of a material obstacle, such as a 
 door, interferes with the transmission of the impression ? 
 
 Whether the presence of light or darkness affects the result? 
 
 Whether sight on the part of either A or P is jiecessary ? 
 
 Whether the result is any more successful when the object 
 or idea selected originates with the agent than with some other 
 person? 
 
 Whether the presence of any particular person is necessary ? 
 
 After these questions are all answered, other details without 
 number would arise. But these would come first. 
 
 It does not appear, that, up to the present time, either the 
 parent society or our own has been able to decide any of these 
 questions. When the experiments were begun, it was indeed 
 
 ►i'SVSSCTliStfWli^Mil 
 

 - *^f^«V#^..->-^.-^- n.,^^^-:!..^ , • 
 
 4AI 
 
 AddreM of the Premlent. 
 
 sought to determine whether contact between Mr. Blackburn 
 und Mr. Smith wa.s necessary. This question was decided in the 
 negative. In another case, wlune the trials were made with 
 Messrs. Bhickburn and Smith, tlie observers, after nuikiiig 
 eleven numbered experiments, placed the two men in separate 
 rooms. It was then found that the communication failed. 
 But there was no inquiry why it failed, and no statement 
 wheth-sr the door was open or shut, or whether the parties 
 were farther apart than tliey were when the experiment suc- 
 ^ceeded. 
 
 ' Whatever view we may take of this matter, it seems to me, 
 that, in the absence of any consideration or decision upon tlie 
 various questions which I have raised respecting the con<litions 
 of thought-transference, we are not entitled to conclude that 
 any causes come into play in the matter except unknown con- 
 ditions. This view is strengthened by another consideration 
 to which I shall call your attention. I have already alluded to 
 the general fact in the history of scientific investigation, that, 
 when sequences of phenomena which are rare in themselves 
 become a subject of inquiry, their reproduction and observation 
 become easier anil easier. Two centtuies ago the phenomena 
 of electricity produced by artificial excitation were extremely 
 rare and had little variety. But, as science advanced, new 
 methods of producing electrical effects were discovered, and 
 the conditions of the production of electricity became easier 
 and easier to fulfil. Now no one has any doubt or difficulty 
 about the method of producing electrical phenomena at 
 pleasure. Why this should be so is obvious. The more we 
 study a phenomenon which is the product of a law of nature 
 acting under certain conditions, the more likely we are to dis- 
 cover such conditions. The more we find out about them, the 
 easier it will be to produce them, or to determine the law of 
 their recurrence. Easier investigation is therefore the almost 
 necessary result of scientific progress. 
 
 On the other hand, if the phenomenon becomes moie rare as 
 we proceed, we reach the conclusion that it is not associated 
 with any given conditions by a law of nature, but is only the 
 result of accidental or unknown circumstances unassociated 
 with any new law. I may, perhaps, borrow an astronomical 
 
Jlistamimmimmi 
 
 Aihlreitfi of the PreniJent. 
 
 illustration of this principle. Wo know that astronomical 
 records contain many observations of dark bodies passing over 
 the disk of the sun. It has frequently been supposed that 
 these phenomena were due to the transits of unknown inter- 
 Mercurial planets. But, when we look into the history of the 
 subject, we find that such observations are nearly always made 
 by comparatively inexperienced observers, with imperfect in- 
 struments; and that as instruments are improved, and observers 
 acquire practice, they gradually disappear. These facts alone 
 have sufficed to render astronomers sceptical as to their reality. 
 The fact that the observations cannot be reconciled with each 
 other in such a way as to (how that they belong to the same 
 body is generally considered to afford nearly conclusive proof 
 of their spurious character. In fact, we may regard this charac- 
 ter as now fully established. 
 
 Guided by this analogy, let us see what we should expect the 
 history of psychical research to be, were thought-transference 
 real. An investigator w()uld have found one or more i)ei-sons 
 possessing some power of influencing the minds of others by a 
 direct transfer of ideas. It would probably nave been found 
 that some ideas were transferred more readily than others, and 
 that the transfer was better marked under some conditions than 
 under others. The discovery of these ideas and their conditions 
 would in its turn have facilitated the study of the transfer by 
 teaching how to secure it, and thus the body of knowledge 
 would have gone on increasing. This knowledge would have 
 resulted in the discovery of other laws, and in the gradual en- 
 largement of the number of people who possessed the power. 
 Finally the investigators would have been able to say: If you 
 consider this or that form of thought ; if you select a certain 
 definable class of people, and proceed in a certain way, — then 
 you will be able, when you please, to observe thought-trans- 
 ference. 
 
 Such has not been the history of the case. The most careful 
 collection of facts and observations during three years has failed 
 to show any common feature in the ideas transferred, and has 
 thrown no light on the question of the condition under which 
 the phenomena can occur. The theory cannot be reconciled on 
 any reasonable hypothesis, even that of thought-transference, 
 
it 
 
 
 AJdrenH of tlie Prendent, 
 
 with the absence of such ftction where we should most ex- 
 pect it. 
 
 When wo consider the iniportunce of the problems which 
 were presented, we cannot but feel regret that so little public 
 attention was given to the subject. If we accept the conclusion 
 of thought-triinsfeience, we liave the startling result that there 
 were and probably still are in England a number of people 
 possessed of the power of perceiving or being affected by what 
 is going on in other men's minds. Why did not Parliament 
 giant the necessary funds to enable these people to be collected, 
 supported at the public expense, and experimented upon? 
 " Practice makes perfect," says the proverb i and it might well 
 be hoped that, after a little well-<lirected practice, these people 
 could perceive the thoughts and memories in the minds of mur- 
 derers and robbers, and thus do away at one stroke with one 
 of the greatest difficulties in administering justice. Instead of 
 this, the parties and the subject have been lost sight of, so far 
 at least as appears from published I'ecords. 
 
 To suppose that the society has made no effort to utilize the 
 knowledge acquired during its existence, by discovering other 
 persons possessed of the powers in question, would be too 
 severe a reflection upon its eminent membership for any one to 
 indulge in. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we are 
 \o presume that a very careful search has been kept up. But, 
 if this is BO, not only have no new discoveries been made, but 
 the old ones, if we can call the conclusions by that name, have 
 not been confirmed. 
 
 I feel it a great misfortune that I have not been able to take 
 an active part in the work of this society, and am not fully 
 acquainted with its latest details. So far, however, as I have 
 learned, we have been less successful than the parent society in 
 finding satisfactory subjects of investigation. We might almost 
 say that careful search has failed to bring us subjects to be ex- 
 perimented upon. An exception to this is found in the case of 
 one of our most eminent members, who has been experimenting 
 upon mesmerized pei-sons. His work having not yet been com- 
 municated to the society, I must speak of it with much reserve, 
 and may possibly be out of strict order in alluding to it at all. 
 I cannot, however, refrain from citing one result which he has 
 
Adilreta qf (he Preaident. 
 
 ) 
 
 verbally communicutetl to me. It in well known thnt mesmer- 
 ized jierHona are tiiuHu Hiipposed to l>u nioMt MUHCcptiMe to the 
 reception of agencieH exerted by other niindrt without phyMical 
 communication. I U>arn, however, that our fellow-experimenter 
 has not been able to find any cases in which any mental impreH- 
 »ion could be conveyed to, or any nervous effect produced upon, 
 a mesmerized subject, without a sufficient physical cause being 
 found. Isolate the agent and the subject from each other, and 
 no impression or action whatever can pass from one to the 
 other. 
 
 If the investigation of thought-transference is to be still fur- 
 ther pursued by us, it may be useful to point out the condi- 
 tions under which we should expect it to be found. One of 
 these must be found in the case of the man who is surrounded 
 by a crowd watching a pyrotechnic display. Within a few 
 yards of him there are a hundred people who simultaneously 
 receive upon their minds the startling impression of a brilliant 
 rocket. If there is such a thing as telepathy, then, a person 
 standing in the middle of the crowd, with his eyes closed and his 
 ears filled with wax, ought to know just when the rocket appears, 
 by a mental tremor of some kind, not traceable to any physical 
 agency. I suggest this as one very simple experiment on the 
 subject. 
 
 Let U3 take another case. West of the Mississippi River 
 there are probably several hundred thousaind persons whose 
 chief amusement is the playing of a game of cards, in which a 
 knowledge of the cards which another person right in front of 
 him is looking at, or even the power to make a probable guess 
 on the subject, would lead rapidly to success and fortune. Yet 
 not a case has ever been known to arise in which a player could 
 get the slighest inkling of what sort of a hand his opponent held 
 by any process of mind-reading. Is it not worth our while to 
 institute an investigation among the players of this game ? 
 
 The question may arise whether the non-occurrence of the 
 phenomenon under those circumstances where we should most 
 suspect it is not due to the rarity of some special power. This 
 hypothesis is however negatived by the observations of our 
 parent society, already mentioned. We have seen that three 
 or four children and a waiting-maid were found in a single 
 
AddreuM qf the Pretident. 
 
 family, till of whom cnul.l mime cards which other persons hnd 
 Himply Umked at, aiul c(»ul«l even jfiiess a mimiier whii^li aiiotht-r 
 person tiiouglit of. Now, if tliu pow.ir w«re really rare, what is 
 tlie probability that four pei^^ons pi)«8esMiiu it would be found 
 in a single family? W should ii, vf to wander among the in- 
 finities to investigate it. I'onsibly it might be suggested that 
 heredity would result in one possessing the same powers iliat 
 others did. Hut heredity could not extend to the wuiting-niaid 
 of the family, uidess we introtluce some such new biological 
 hypothesis as t\\i absorption of one person's powers by another. 
 Not oidy were four or five of the persons found in one family, 
 but in other cases two or more were found at work in the same 
 factory. Now, adopt what theory we may, this curious group- 
 ing of i^ersons endowed with the power prevents us from re- 
 garding it as sporadic. We must form the hypothesis, that, 
 when one individual possesses it, there is & certain chance of its 
 passing to another individual who chances to be an inmate of 
 the same family. But, if we adopt this hypothesis, how shall 
 we prevent it from spreading through the whole community ? 
 In fine, what rational hypothesis can we form to explain every 
 thing? If we grant that thought-transference is a fact, just 
 how are we to limit it? How explain its apparent absence 
 under circumstances where we shcmld most suspect it? What 
 prevents any one person from being influenced by the thoughts 
 and feelings of the whole thousand milli«m of other people who 
 live in the world? In the absence of any answer by the 
 Psychical Society, I shall suggest one : The intensity of the 
 effect diminishes very rapidly with the distance. 
 
 If this be the case, it should increase very rapidly as the dis- 
 tance diminishes ; and of this no evidence has been found. Nor 
 is the hypothesis of dependence upon distance supported by all 
 the facts. In some of the most striking cases on record, the 
 parties were separated by miles ; I am not sure but continents 
 or oceans have occasionally intervened. 
 
 It appeai-8, therefore, that not only has no theory of thought- 
 transference been constructed, but it does not seem possible 
 even to imagine any one simple theory, or set of general laws, 
 which will explain all thg phenomena. I beg leave to say once 
 more, that what we want is a statement of general laws, like 
 
 I' 
 
i 
 
 Addremt of the Pre»uieu(. 
 
 tho«e which we find in bo(»k« on meohunicH, olpotricity, ningnet- 
 iHUj, or phyniology, setting forth tho coiiditionH nnilor which 
 tlioiigliUrunrtference can he brought tibout. That no Hii'h 
 work has appeared, or been attempted, can, it Heeina to inc, be 
 acc(;unted for only by the fact jiwt brougiit out, that no one «et 
 •)f principle* cau bo formuUted that will cover all the »ui»iKmed 
 
 lactH. ^ e \ V 
 
 When, some two years ago, the early experiments of the Eng- 
 lish psychical society were made known, it seemed to me that 
 a stnuig case was made out for a new law of nature governing 
 the transnussion of thought, or some form of mental intluence 
 from perso)i to person. The state of the case I suppose to be 
 that a number of members found themselves permanently able 
 to copy drawings without other guidance than the thoughts of 
 other members not in physical contact with them. Under the 
 influence of this possibility, I encouraged the formation of our 
 own society, and accepted membership in it. 
 
 Being thus interested in the work, my first act was very natu- 
 rally to enter upon a more critical and careful study of the work 
 of the parent society. I soon noticed that in its essential fea- 
 tures it differed remarkably from what I had supposed. It lost 
 the character of generality which I had attributed to it. As 
 the result of the circumstances which I have already considered, 
 I may say that the work of the society seems to me to have 
 almost entirely removed any ground which might have existed 
 for believing thought-transference to be a reality. I have seen 
 nothing in our own work to change that conclusion. Every 
 wide consideration which occurs to me leads in the same direc- 
 tion. We are not dealing primarily with a question of quantity 
 and degree, but with one of yes or no. Considered in ad- 
 vance of experience, it may be an open question whether thought 
 in its very nature is or is not transferrable. Whether we regard 
 thought as simply the working of our own organism, or regard 
 our minds as inhabiting our nervous systems, it may be true 
 in either case that our minds are absolutely incapable of exert- 
 ing an actio in distans. Now, if this bg true as an essential qual- 
 ity of mind, then the very expression *♦ thought-transference " 
 involves an impossibility. But granting that it is true, and that 
 thought may be transferred, then reflect upon the number of 
 
.^v« 
 
 Address of the President. 
 
 people who surround us, and the infinity of the conditions undei* 
 which thought might be transferred. How is it that with such 
 ample opportunities of experiment extending througli centuries, 
 and such industry as has been devoted to the subject here and 
 in England through the last two years, no living person knows 
 any more about the conditions of transference to-day than men 
 did a thousand years ago ? 
 
 The question suggests itself whether the search for the 
 phenomena under present circumstances is not much that of 
 looking for a kind of gold which shall differ in density from 
 ordinary gold, or for a smbstance of unheard-of specific gravity. 
 We may advertise for specimens of such things, and execute 
 many weighings, with a view of testing claimants to our atten- 
 tion. Yet I am persuaded that, should we undertake this., the 
 unanimous views of chemists would be that we were wasting 
 our labor. The negative evidence that no gold has been found 
 differing much in specific gravity from that which we carry in 
 our pockets is conclusive against its existence. 
 
 Whether we should take the same view of thought-transfer- 
 ence is a question on which I refrain from expressing a decided 
 opinion, for the reason that no such opinion is necessary. Even 
 if there is no real thought-transference, we have cases of appar- 
 ent thought-transference to investigate and explain, which may 
 lead us to the discovery of new laws of mental action. 
 
 An illustration of the line of research here indicated may not 
 be out of place. The largest collection of facts made by our 
 parent society comprises occurrences of the following general 
 character. A person, generally one not subject to hallucina- 
 tions, suddenly receives an impression the cause of which he 
 cannot define. Commonly it is the visual image of some absent 
 friend or relative in a state of suffering, or the voice of a speaker 
 calling aloud, or the impression a pain not associated with any 
 physical cause. After a few hours, days, or weeks, news is 
 received from the friend that something had happened to him 
 at the very moment the impression had been received, bearing 
 too close relation to the impression for a mere accidental co-in- 
 cidence. Very often the case is one of the death of the friend. 
 Sometimes he cried aloud in pain, and used the very words 
 which the other heard. 
 
 I 
 
 r'.ia';g6'Sr;- ii ar H g - " . - ■ 
 
Address of the President. 
 
 I 
 
 ^ 
 
 Such is the order of events as commonly described ; Imt, if 
 described as they actually come to knowledge, tliey would ap- 
 pear ill a different form. The experience of the observer would 
 be : I heard that my friend was dead, or that lie had met with 
 an accident and cried aloud. After inquiring when the death 
 or accident occurred, I remembered that about that time I heard 
 this very exclamation, or saw his image before my eyes. 
 
 Now, we have two theories on which this may be explained. 
 It may be that there was a real transfer from the friend to the 
 liercipient ; or the whole recollection may have been the work 
 of the percipient's mind at the time,— -a mere illusion of the 
 memory. My own experience leads me to believe that these 
 illusions are more common and more difficult to distinguish 
 from the reality than generally supposed. I have no reason to 
 consider myself in any unusual degree the victim of illusions; 
 yet I frequently find vague impressions in my mind the reality 
 of which I am unable either to deny or affirm. They may have 
 been dreams, and they may have been occurrences. I fre- 
 quently have a dream which I forget all about until a day or 
 two afterwards, when perhaps some impression produced in the 
 dream is brought to mind. Having totally forgotten that I 
 had any dream at all, I am often at a loss to say whether the 
 impression is that of something which I really saw, or some- 
 thing which I dreamed of. I do not remember ever to have 
 had an hallucination in my waking hours, but dream hallHci- 
 nations I find not at all uncommon. It may not be out of 
 place if I relate one, which, after the lapse of more than a year, 
 I am still unable to classify with certainty as a reality or illu- 
 sion. * 
 
 I dined with friends at a hotel, later and more generously 
 than was my custom, and retired without the post-prandial air- 
 ing necessary in my case to sound sleep. The window of my 
 room in the hotel was directly above the kitchen, and I was 
 much disturbed by noise coming from that quarter. Some time 
 in the night, I cannot tell when, I heard, or thought I heard, 
 a window opened above my room, and the (roice of a guest call- 
 ing in a loud voice to the servants below, " If you don't stop 
 that racket, I will get up and leave the hotel." The whole im- 
 pression was so vivid that I have ever since been in doubt 
 

 Address of the President. 
 
 whether it was a dream or a reality, with perhaps slight proba- 
 bilities in favor of its being a dream. 
 
 I believe that our dream life and our imaginative powers are 
 more potent factors in the production of supiwsed extraordi- 
 nary phenomena than is commoiily supi^sed. Whatever may 
 be the fate of the theory of thought-transference, the phenom- 
 ena of hypnotisms, as well as of dreams, illusions, and faults 
 of memory, are ah before us. They form a field of whicli the 
 cultivation has only commenced, and which ought to prove 
 attractive to all. I even venture to say, that, if thought-trans- 
 ference is real, we shall establish its reality more speedily by 
 leaving it out of consideration, and collecting facts for study, 
 than by directing our attention especially to it. 
 
 ti, ' » 
 
ba- 
 
 are 
 rdi- 
 lay 
 :nn- 
 ilts 
 the 
 ove 
 tns- 
 
 by 
 
miimmmm