IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 5?5^ 1.0 m Ki2 12.2 us I.I 1.*^ H^ UULl IL25 i 1.4 1.6 '^^'/ v^ Hiotographic Sciences Corporation 33 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14S80 (716) 872-4503 '■'I ^ 37 <^ ^J^ 'S) L6> CIHM Microfiche Series (l\/lonographs) ICIMH Collection de microfiches (monographles) Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notes / Notes tee! The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked below. Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur I I Covers damaged/ Couverture endommagte restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restauree et/ou pellicula □ Covers Couver □ Cover title missing/ Le titre de couvertu couverture manque I I Coloured maps/ Caites giographiques en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. oti Encre de couleur (i.e other than blue or black)/ autre que bleue ou noire) I ~l' Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ I ^1 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur □ Bound with other material/ Relie avec d'autres documents D D Tight binding may cause shadowr. or distortion along interior margin/ La reliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsion le long de la marge interieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouttes lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela etait possible, ces pages n'ont pas ete filmees. n Additional comments:/ Commentaires supplementaires; This Item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est f ilme au taux de reduction indique cidessous. 10X 14X 18X 22' 7 12X 16X 20X i Bibliographic Notes / Notes techniques et bibliographiques L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il tui a M possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-4tre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite. ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la mithode normale de f ilitiage sont indiqu^s ci-dessous. □ Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur □ Pages damaged/ Pages endommagees □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurees et/ou pellicul^s Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages decolorees. tachetees ou piquees □ Pages detached/ Pages detachees BShowth rough/ Transparence varies/ inegale de I'impression □ Quality of print Vi Qualite inegale de □ Continuous pagination/ Pagination continue □ Includes index(es)/ Comprend un (des) index Title on header taken from:/ Le titre de l'en-t§te provient: □ Title page of issue/ Page de titre de la livraison □ Caption of issue/ Titre de depart de la depart de la livraison i/ Generique (periodiques) de la livraison I I Masthead/ 7 26 X 30X 20X 24 X 28X 32* Th« copy flim«d h«r« has bMn raproducad thanka to tha qanarosity of: University of King's College Halifax Tha imag appaaring hara ara tha baat quality possibia considaring tha condition and lagibility of tha original sopy and In Icaaping with tha filming contract spacificatlona. Original copias in printac prnpt.: eovars ara filmad baginning with tha front eovar and anding on tha laat paga with a printad er illuatrat»i Impraa- sion. or tha bacic covar whan appropriata. All othar original copiaa ara filmad baginning on tha first paga with a printad or illustratad Impraa- sion. and anding on tha last paga with a printad or liluatratad uvipraaaion. Tha laat racordad frama on aach microficha shall contain tha symbol — » (maaning "CON- TINUED"), or tha symbol V (maaning "END"), whichavar appliaa. Mapa. piataa. charts, ate., may ba filmad at diffarant raduction ratioa. Thoaa too iarga to ba antJraly inciudad in ona axpoaura ara filmad baginning in tha uppar laft hand eomar. laft to right and top to bottom, aa many framaa aa raquirad. Tha following diagrama illuatrato tha mathod: 1 2 3 1 2 4 5 ucad thanks L'«x«mplajr« filmi fut raproduit grica i la gin^rosit* da: University of King's College Halifax It quality I iagibility th tha ara filmad ling on mi impraa- ita. All irig on tha mpraa- a prtntad ficha "CON- END"). >dat ga to ba mad , laft to waa Btatha Laa imagaa suivantaa ont iti raproduitas avac la plua grand soin. compta tanu da la cundition at da la nattat* da I'axampiaira film4, at 9n conformity avac laa conditiona du contrat da filmaga. Laa axampiiiraa origina<^x dont la couvartura an papiar aat lmprim«a sont filmte an commanqant par la pramiar plat at an tarminunt soit par la darni«ra paga qui comporta una amprainta d Impraaaion ou d'iilustration, soit par la sacond plat, salon la cas. Toua l«« autras axi^mpiairas originaux sont fltmia an eommanqant par la pramiira paga qui comporta una amprainta d impraaaion ou d'iilustration a? en tarminant par la darniAra paga qui comporta una talla amprainta. Un daa symbolaa suivants apparaitra sur la domiAra imaga da chaqua microvicha, salon la caa: la symbola — ^ signifia "A SUIVRE" la symbolo V signifia "FIN". Laa cartaa. planchas. tablaaux. ate, pauvant dtra film*a A daa taux da rMuction diffirants. Loraqua la documant aat trop grand pour itra raproduit an un saul clich«. il aat film* A partir da I'angia sup4riaur gaucha, da gaucha i droita. at dKi haut tt baa, •n pranant la nombra d'^magaa n«caaaaira. Laa diagrammas suivants illuatrant la m^thoda. 1 2 3 I 5 6 6 ^^rfC 7i^^ ^<^^9 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL OK THE HOLY EUCHARIST A HRIEF F.XPOSmoX OF THE HARMONY SUnsiSTIVG liF/rWFEN THE PASSION OF CHRIST AND IT.S REPRESENTATIONS IN THE OLD AND NEW COVENANTS RV TlfF, REV. H. C. STUART, M.A INCUMBENT OK DOfRG LO.MS, .JITEBEC NEW YORK JAMES POTT & CO., PUBLISHERS MO.NTREAI, : ROWSELL & HUTCHISON Copyright, 1889, Bv JAMES rOTT & CO. Press of J. J, Little & Co, Astor Place, New York. 'Moreover they be neither dark nor dumb Ceremonies, but arc so set forth, that every man may understand what they do mean, and to what use they do serve." —Preface of English Prayer Book. Seriously considering what Christianitv is, and what the truths of the Gospel are; and earnestly beseeching Alm.gh.y God to accompany with H.s blessing every endeavour f.,r promulgating them to mankind in the clearest, plainest, most affecting, and majestic manner, for the sake of Jesus Christ our blessed Lord and Sav,our."-/VcAuv of American Prayer Book CONTENTS. I. The Memorial of the Tassion . 3 II. EUCHARISTIC RiiPRESENTA JNS . . 9 III. Key to the Eucharisiic Represen- tations J. IV. Harmony of the Passion and its Memorials .21 V. The Divine Life and its Memorials 27 VI, The Old Testament Outline of the Passion ,c VII. The Eucharistic Picture of the Passion . . . , . . .39 VIII. The Sin-Offering 43 IX. The Burnt-Offering .... 63 X. The Peace-Offering . . . .105 XI. Conclusion 120 h I I. THE PRECIOUS DEATH IS SHOWN IN THE EUCHARIST. I. THE PRECIOUS DEATH IS SHOWN IN THE EUCHARIST. The commemorative aspect of the Holy Eucharist is practically an enigma to the ma- jority of English churchmen. And yet it is so important that the Prayer Book of the Church of England sets it forth as the most important aspect of the Eucharist. For instance, every child is thus catechised : "Why was the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper ordained ? " " For the continual remembrance of the Sacri- fice of the Death of Christ, and of the benefits which we receive thereby." And the prayer of Consecration contains these words: "He hath instituted and or- dained Holy Mysteries as pledges of His love, and for a continual remembrance of His Death." "Did institute, and in His Holy 4 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL Gospel command us to continue, a perpetual 'ncmory^i,^. His Precious DeatI, untU His commg again. . . . Grant that we receiv- ■ng these Thy creatures of bread and wine Chri:?'"l r l""' '"" ""' ^-'°- Jesus' Chnst s Holy I.„„tu„-„„, ,.„ ,„,,^^J^ H,s Death and Passion, . . , Do this /„ re,ne,„irauee 01 Mo. . . . Do this, as oft .->» ye shall drink it /« rmm^r««,^ of Me " The teaching of the Church is thus seen to be ,dcnt,cal with that of our Lord, and with the declarafon of S. Paul, that "as often as ye eat th,s bread, and drink this cup, ye do sW the Lord's death till He come "0 Cor In accordance with this teaching, I here add the followmg testimony of some of the great- est among modern divines : thf/lTn''t""'-' '"'^^ ^°' °"^ "•"=) believe hat the Eucharist was instituted by our Lord for the co,«mem^an-o« of Him ; even of His Sacnfice, or, if we may so speak, for a co,n- «,emoratn:e Sacrifice, and not only for a Sacra- ment.—Zlespmsia ad Apohgiam. Bislwp Jeremy Taylor.- As it is a ecmnem. OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 5 oratmi and reprcsentment of Christ's Death, so it is a commemorative Sacrifice.— Life of Christ, Discourse xix. John Keblc: The Eucharist has two pur- poses: I. To be a continual remembrance, or memory, or memorial, before God as well as man, not a repetition or continuance of the Sacrifice of the Death of Christ. 2. To be verily and indeed taken and received by the faithful, for the strengthening and refreshing of their so\xU.~£ucharistical Adoration, p. 75. Dr. Von Dollinger : The sacrificial rite of the earthly Church represents and typifies that act of love, of which it is the appointed me- morial.—First Age of the Church. The following quotations from the writings of the most celebrated fathers may be taken as representing the teaching of the early Church on this most important view of the Holy Eucharist. 5". Cyprian : As often as we drink, we do in remembrance of the Lord the same thing which the Lord also ^^<^.— Epistle to Caecilius, sec. ii. S. Augustine: That alone we call (the Body of Christ) which, taken of the fruits of the 6 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL. earth, and consecrated with the Mystic Prayer we receive solemnly, to the salvation of our souls, in memory of our Lord's Passion for us. ~De Trinitatc, iii. 4, sec. 10. 5. Chrysostom: What then do we not offer every day? Certainly wc do ; but to make a memorial o{ His "D^zAh.- Homily, xviii. 3. It is needless to continue quotations from great divines, as those given above are more than sufficient to show that the most eminent Christian teachers have left on record their unqualified adherence to the plain statements of the Bible, that the Holy Eucharist is essen- tially a representation of Christ's Passion and Death, or as Brevint briefly states it, " a Sacra- mental Passion," and as S. Paul vigorously asserts, a ''shewing the Lord's Death." II. HOW CHRIST'S DEATH IS SHOWN IN THE EUCHARIST. 'i i II. HOW CHRIST'S DEATH IS SHOWN IN THE EUCHARIST. TliK Holy Eucharist from the carhest ages has shown a clear and systematical rei)rcsen- tation of our Lord's whole Life, from His Con- ception until His Ascension into Heaven, and it is professedly an imitation of His present pleading for us at the right hand of the Father. The Saviour's Life on earth is commemorated in the varying parts of the Liturgy, as the Introits, Collects, Epistles, G6spels, Sermons, Hymns, etc., used at the Great Festivals and during the Seasons of the Church's year, which professedly commemorate the whole period. It is also represented by the use of the Eccle- siastical or Liturgical Colours which are em- ployed to mark and accentuate the teaching pertaining to those Seasons. And the Saviour's Passion and Death are 10 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL. commemorated, not only by the consecration prayer and the manual acts accompanying,' it, but by the very parts of the Liturgy itself, whose nature and order owe their very existence to the commemorative aspect of the Eucharist. The rubrics explain how these parts must be employed, and with what ceremonies they niust be accompanied, to secure the representation required. And the officiating clergy and atten- dant ministers, in connection with the ancient ornaments of the Church, complete the pre- scribed means, not only for making the awful memorial, but also for making our Sacrifice of Praise and Thanksgiving an intelligible and reasonable service. It is thus seen that every part of the Liturgy, every rubrical direction, and every adjunct of the service is filled full of holy meaniwg. How sad it is to hear thoughtless people vlici .;sS cd " What mean ye by this service ? " boldly de- clare that it means nothing at all ! As if the universal practice of God's Church, from the earliest times, and the solemn enactments of holy synoH,, constitute no authority they are morally bound to respect. I (-fl^^ jiisccration panying it, urgy itself, y existence ,• Eucharist, rts must be s they niust )resentation y and atten- the ancient ;te the pre- g the awful Sacrifice of lUigible and the Liturgy, y adjunct of aniijg. How ^'ic-i r.sl-cd " boldly de- . ! As if the ch, from the nactments of rity they are xt III. FROM THE OTHER MEMORIALS OF CHRIST'S DEATH. WE LEARN THE REAL SIGNIFI- CANCE OF ITS EUCHARISTIC REPRESENTATION. I III. FROM THE OTHER MEMORIALS OF CHRIST'S DEATH, WE LEARN THE REAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ITS EUCHARISTIC REPRESENTA TION. Every Christian knows that the great Sacri- fice once made for the Redemption of mankind was the Death of Jesus Christ upon the altar of the Cross. Of this Sacrifice, which can never be repeated, the Bible teaches us there have been established by Divine authority three memorials or representations, namely, 1. The Sacrificial System of the Old Cove- nant. 2. The Holy Eucharist of the Christian Dispensation. 3- And the Worship in Heaven. Now, as three pictures of the same object drawn by three different masters, contain the i i 14 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL same features recognizable in all, so must these sacred pictures of the Passion and Death of Christ, drawn in every case by the same, and that a Divine hand, bear a remarkable likeness to one another. The comparison enables us to see here and there, in the mystical picture the Eucharist presents to us, worlds of mean- ing and wonderful resemblances that our study of the Death of Jesus, as related in the Gospel, had not revealed to us. Archdeacon Freeman remarks that the necessity for a thorough examination of the old sacrificial system, " fol- lows from a view of all such passages of the New Testament as describe the work of Christ as sacrificial. . • • In a word, the New Testament, in the matter of Christ's sacrificial and priestly operation, is throughout ivritten in cipher; «ind the key is only to be found in the old sacrificial economy."* Again, it is scarcely necessary to point out that the deep significance of the mysterious blood-sprinkling of the sin-offering, and the corresponding Con- fession and Absolution of the Christian memo- rial, and very many other fcatu^s^o f the two ^Principles of Divine Service, Vol II., part 2, p. 8. >'4 1 \ OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 15 List these Death of ame, and I likeness lables us d picture of mean- our study le Gospel, Freeman thorough tern, " fol- fes of the ; of Christ the New I sacrificial jt written : found in gain, it is t the deep -sprinkling iiding Con- ;ian memo- of the two rt 2, p. 8. Covenants, are only recognized by a careful comparison with the heavenly pattern. The three dispensations which represented the Redeemer's Death, in their solemn acts of worship, were themselves symbolized in the three parts of the ancient tabernacle, the Court, the Holy Place, and the Holy of Holies. Regarded as a whole, the tabernacle was a type of the Incarnation. This is implied in its very name, " Tabernacle of Meetin*^ " between God and man. For in the Incarnate Jesus, who " tabernacled in us " (S. John i. 14), the Divine and human natures met to- gether. Jesus claimed to be the fulfilment of all that the tabernacle foreshadowed, for He called the temple His Body, and in the Book of the Revelations we read : " I heard a great voice out of heaven, saying. Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and He will dwell with them, and they shall be His people " (Rev. xxi. 3). Here Jesus is called "the tabernacle of God," and He is also called " the temple,"— " I saw no temple therein ; for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it'' ( — i6 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL (xxi. 22). It is thus seen that the tabernacle was a symbol of God dwelling with man in Christy and it also symbolized man admitted to dwell forever with God in Him, Who is both God and man ; " I in them, and Thou in Me " (S. John xvii. 23). "That they all may be one; as Thou, Father, art in Me, and I in Thee, that they also may be one in us" (xvii. 21). The tabernacle being a symbol of Christ it follows that it must also have typified His mystical Body, the Church. Here we notice the extraordinary correspondence between them. Kurtz briefly explains their similarity. " The threefold division of the tabernacle con- tained a figurative and typical representation of the three progressive stages, by which the kingdom of God on earth arrives at its visible manifestation and ultimate completion. . . . This triple stage of approach to God, which was set forth simultaneously in space in the symbolism of the tabernacle, is realized success- ively in time through the historical develop- ment of the kingdom of God. The first stage was the Israelitish theocracy; the second is the Christian Church ; the third and last will OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 17 be the heavenly Jerusalem of the Apoca- lypse." * The court of the tabernacle with its brazen altar, its gorgeous worship, its music, its priests in their grand robes, led only into the Holy Place, as the whole Israelitish economy was but the schoolmaster to lead God's ancient peo- ple to Christ. The outer court with its bleed- ing sacrifices, its laver and brazen altar of burnt offering, fitly represented the Mosaic dispensa- tion, with its unceasing shedding of blood which could never take away sins. The Holy Place, in which no bleeding sacri fices were offered, illuminated with the seven- fold flame of the golden candlestick, with the Table of shew-bread and altar of incense, was a fit representation of the Christian Church, illuminated with the sevenfold gifts of the Holy Spirit, interceded for by the incense of the true High-priest's perpetual pleadings, and on whose altar-table ever lies the bread of the pure unbloody offering of the New Covenant (Malachi, i. 11). That the Holy of Holies was a type of Hea- * Sacramental Worship of the Old Testament, p. 44. Clark. « 2 r i8 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL. vcn we are distinctly assured by the Apostle. "Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of tJie true ; but into heaven itself' (Heb. ix. 24). In considering the threefold division of the tabernacle, and its symbolism, we must notice that the progression was from a lower to a higher stage, and that a veil in each instance guarded the entrance into each place. When the veil which barred the way was removed, it granted access to the stage above it. When . Christ died, the veil which hung between the outer court and the Holy Place was rent asun- der. His death broke down the wall of parti- tion between Jew and Gentile, that they might be one in God, dwelling together in love and peace in the holy places. And here the Church now waits in the Holy Place, patiently walking by faith, and knowing full well that after the Judgment of the last great day, the final veil, the everlasting doors, shall be broken down, and the final dispensation shall be reached, the Church at rest, triumphant in the golden city. he Apostle, holy places enures of tJie , ix. 24). ision of the must notice lower to a ch instance ace. When removed, it ; it. When )etween the s rent asun- ^all of parti- ; they might in love and IV. THE RELATION SUBSISTING BETWEEN THE TWO ME- MORIALS AND THE THINGS THEY REPRESENT. in the Holy md knowing of the last isting doors, dispensation , triumphant r I IV. THE RELATION SUBSISTING BE- TWEEN THE TWO MEMORIALS AND THE THINGS THEY REPRE- SENT. The relation which the Old Covenant bears to the New is clearly stated as follows : He- brews X. I, «« The law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things. " On the interpretation of this passage, Bishop Wordsworth writes, " According to the mind of ancient expositors, the word ffjda would best be rendered here by sketch or outline (and not shadow); and the word eiucov, by picture (not image). There are three things considered here, i. The reality of the future ^ood things— in heaven and eternity; 2. The dKo^v^ or clear picture of them, in the gospel; 3. The Gma, or dim outline of them, in the Law." " S. Paul 22 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL designates here the future life as the things themselves; and he calls the Gospel the dnovi., or picture of those things ; and he terms the Old Dispensation the amav, or sketch of the future: for the e/«aiv, or picture, exhibits the objects more clearly, but the outline delineates them more obscurely than the ^iuc^v docs."- Theodoret. The means of comparing these memorials with the reality is thus indicated to us. We shall obtain a truer, juster idea )' the great truths of Redemption, and we shall be able to discern in the finished picture features that would otherwise escape attention, by carefully examining the sacrificial system of the Old Covenant, and detecting therein the broad out- line of the Saviour's Death on the Cross, and then by comparing it, line by line, with the finished picture produced in the Eucharist, and finally by repeating the comparison of both with the divine reality. There are three special features of the Saviour's Death to be considered. I. He shed His precious Blood for the sins of mankind. _4^*» or THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 23 the thhigs ho BiHova, terms the ;tch of the xhibits the ; delineates ov does. — memorials :o us. We f the great I be able to atures that by carefully of the Old e broad out- e Cross, and 16, with the i Eucharist, mparison of jres of the [ for the sins 2. He offered Himself a complete sacrifice, go that nothing was lacking to its perfect con- summation. 3. He instituted the means by which He could be sacramentally joined to mankind, and mankind could be joined together in Him. These form the special features of the sac- rificial system of the Old Covenant, and they exhibit the special features also which char- acterize the Holy Eucharist. The following table will perhaps show this more clearly, and also the representative value of these features in depicting the sacrifice of Christ : THE SKETCH. THE PICTURE. THE KEALITV. The Sin Offering. 1 Sacramental Confession and Absolution. Shedding His Blood on the Cross. The Burnt Offering. The Holy Eucharist asa Sacrifice. Offering to God a life of Per- fect Obedience. The Peace Offering. The Holy Eucharist asa Communion Feast. Kceding us with His Body and Blood. 1 V. CHRIST'S LIFE AS COMMEMO- RATED IN THE TWO COVE- NANTS. CHRIST'S LIFE AS COMMEMORATED IN THE TWO COVENANTS. The Divine and human natures of our Blessed Lord are mystically represented in the Eucharist by the two altar lights. The injunc- tions of Edward VI., 1547, order the continu- ance of " two lights upon the high Altar, before the Sacrament, which for the signification that Christ is the very true light of the world, they shall suffer to remain still." The Incarnation is also mystically set forth in the ♦' mixed chalice," or the admixture of a little water with the sacramental wine. This is explained by S. Cyprian as follows: "In the water is understood the people, but in the wine is showed the blood of Christ. But when the water is mingled in the cup with wine, the people is made one with Christ, and the assem- bly of believers is associated and conjoined 28 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL with Him on whom it believes ; which associa- tion and conjunction of water and wine ^s so mingled in the Lord's cup, that that mixture cannot any more be separated. . . , Thus, therefore, in consecrating the cup of the Lord, water alone cannot be offered, even as wine alone cannot be offered. For if any one offer wine only, the blood of Christ is dissociated from us ; but if the water be alone, the people are dissociated from Christ ; but when both are mingled, and are joined with one another by a close union, there is completed a spiritual and heavenly sacrament." — Epistle Ixii., sec. 13. Vol. V. The Ante-Nicene Fathers. American Edition. In the worship of the Old Covenant, the Incarnation was mystically represented by a variety of means. I. By number. Bishop Wordsworth on S. Matt. X. 2, writes, " From an induction of par- ticulars it would appear that 3 is an arithmeti- cal symbol of what is divine, and 4 of what is created. 3 + 4 = 7 is the union of the two ; 3 X 4 = 12 is the blending and indwelling of what is divine with what is created." Twelve OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 29 speaks of a body conditioned by the very indwelling of God, and is also the number of the mystic Body of Christ. Thus there were twelve patriarchs, twelve tribes, twelve pillars at the great sacrifice at Sinai (Ex. xxiv. 4), twelve apostles, and twelve times twelve thou- sand, the number forming the Church of the redeemed (Rev. vii. 4). The number of the Incarnation is also seen in the number of loaves on the table of shew- bread, and in the jewelled breast-plate of the high-priest. 2. By Colour. The sacred colours of the tabernacle were blue, red, purple, white and gold. Blue is the symbol for what is divine, and red for what is created. The intermixture of red and blue is purple, and is therefore the colour used to symbolize the Incarnation. It appeared side by side with blue and red in the interior hangings, in the veils, and in the vest- ments of the high-priests. In one instance it is found alone ; the altar of burnt-offering, dur- ing removal, was covered with a purple -loth. 3- The Incarnation was also symbolized by the two goats of the great day of Atonement, Ij^B 30 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL i ! and by the two birds of the Purification of the leper. In Bishop Wordsworth's commentary on the Bible (Lev. xvi. 8, note), we read: " Some were of opinion that the live goat rep- resented Christ in His Divine Nature, while the goat that was slain symbolized Him in His suffering humanity." Of the birds he writes : ** In the two birds, one killed, and the other let go, ancient expositors have seen a figure of the One sacrifice for sin in His two natures, human and divine, the union of which was necessary to constitute an acceptable sacrifice for the moral leprosy of sin ; and in the living bird, dipped in the blood of the slain one, a type of the union of Christ's everliving Godhead with His Manhood " (Lev. xvi). We have already considered the whole taber- nacle as a symbol of Christ's life among men. (I.) Every Christian Church edifice is supposed • to depict the same divine life, — to do this by its threefold division of nave, choir and sacra- rium. The Church s manner of commemora- ting the Lord's life will at once recur to every reader's mind. (2.) There are the regularly- OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 31 recurring allusions to each great division of His life, made in the Introits, Processionals, and other hymns, and there are the Collects, Epistles, Gospels, Prefaces, and Sermons ; (3.) and also the Liturgical colours that have natu- rally passed on from the tabernacle and temple, into use in the Christian Church. By these means the most complete commemoration of the life of Christ is made in the regular services of the church every year. Vi. CHRIST'S DEATH AS OUTLINED IN THE WORSHIP OF THE OLD COVENANT. VI. CHRISTS DEATH AS OUTLINED IN THE WORSHIP OF THE OLD COV- ENANT. THiiRE were six distinct actions in the ritual of the ancient sacrificial system, as follows : 1. The Presentation of the offering by the offerer. 2. The Imposition of hands by the offerer. 3. The Killing of the victim by the offerer. 4. The Sprinkling of the blood by the priest. 5. The Burning of parts of the offering upon the altar by the priest. 6. The Partaking of the offering by both priest and offerer. This system represented the chief acts of the great sacrifice of Christ. I. He was offered for the Redemption of the world. 36 IHE DIVINE MEMORIAL. 2. He was accepted as a substitute for man- kind. 3. He was slain as the substitute for man- kind. 4. His Blood sprinkling means His continual mediation. 5. The Burning signified God's acceptance of the offering. 6. Both priest and offerer partake of the Sacrament of the Lord's Body and Blood. The sacrificial scheme consisted in the sacri- fice of three victims, each one of which had as its characteristic one of the special features named in the last three numbers jf the preced- ing scheme. Thus : 1. The Sin-offering had its characteristic in the sprinkling of the blood. 2. The Burnt-offering, in its being entirely consumed by fire upon the altar. 3. The Peace-offering, in its being eaten as a sacrificial meal by both priest and offerer. Christ was the Sin-offering, the Burnt-offer- ing, and the Peace-offering, and His great sac- rifice contained the special features which char- acterized them. VII. CHRIST'S DEATH AS SET FORTH IN THE EUCHARIST. VII. CHRISTS DEATH AS SET FORTH IN THE EUCHARIST. The outline, with its six sacrificial actions, agrees with the completed picture in the num- ber and signification of its parts. 1. The bringing in of the elements, and arranging them upon the Credence-Table, an- swer to the Presentatio th- victim by the offerer. 2. Confession and Absolution and all the sub- sequent parts of the Liturgy to the beginning of the Canon, or Consecration Prayer, answer to the Imposition of hands. 3. The Consecration of the Elements, and the ritual Fraction, answer to the Slaying of the victim. 4. The mediatorial element of the Eucharist answers to the Sprinkling of the blood. 5. The commixture or placing one part of the 40 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL. threefold fraction into the Chalice tor epresent the Resurrection, answers to God's acceptance of the sacrifice of the Death of Christ as a sub- stitute for mankind. " He was raised for our justification." 6. Communion is the Feast on Christ's Sac- rifice. sent ince sub- our 3ac- VIII. THE SIN-OFFERING. to of m Ol ne hu it coi sid wh coi an( offi he VIII. THE SIN-OFFERING. I. iriE SACRIFICIAL OUTLINE. The sacijiicial scheme of the Mosaic Dis- pensation consisted in three degrees of approach towards God. The first step must be the sin- offering. This was expiatory in its nature, and must therefore precede the Burnt and Peace Offerings. The righteous Abel, conscious of his need of cleansing from the defiling touch of sin, humbly brought a lamb for a sin-offering, and it was accepted. Cain, on the other liand, was conscious of no sin, his self-righteous soul con- sidered itself in no need of any expiation whatever. He considered himself ready for communion with God without any repentance, and without the formal acceptance of a burnt- offering as a substitute for himself. Therefore he appeared at the altar bringing a peace-offer- 44 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL ing; and although he was graciously informed that his offering was rejected on account of unrepented sin, he was unwilling to retrace his steps, and was angry because God could not receive him without repentance. The sin-offering differed according to the station of the offerers, (i) For the high-priest, or for the whole congregation, the sin-offering was to be " a young bullock without blemish" (Lev. iv. 3, 14) ; and (2) in the case of a common person, " a kid of the goats, a female without blemish (Lev. iv. 28), or a lamb, a female with- out blemish (ib. 32); and in the case of a ruler, " a kid of the goats, a male without blemish " (ib. 23). 1. The offerer brought the victim to the door of the tabernacle. In every case he must be a willing offerer. 2. He then laid his hands upon the head of the victim, at the same time confessing liis sins. Outram gives the form of confession, as follows: — " I beseech Thee, O Lord ; I have sinned, I have. . . . {^Here the person specified the particular sin he had committed, and Jor which OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 45 he desired expiation\ ; but now I repent, and let this be my expiation." 3. He then killed the victim. 4. The priest now took the blood of the vic- tim, and if the offerers were of the first order mentioned above, he carried it into the Holy- Place, and sprinkled it seven times before the veil which hung over the entrance into the Holy of Holies, put some of it upon the horns of the golden altar of Incense, and then poured the blood at the bottom of the altar of burnt- ofifering. If the offerers were of the second rank, thai is, rulers or common people, the priest took the blood of the victim to the brazen altar of burnt-offering, put some of it upon the four horns of the altar and poured it out at the bottom as in the sin-offering for the first order of people. 5. The priest now burnt all the fat upon the altar. 6. If the offerers were priests or the whole congregation, the flesh of the victim was taken outside the camp, and there entirely consumed by fire. If the offerers were rulers or common people, the flesh was taken into a part of the I: 46 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL Court called a holy place, where it was eaten by the priests. In the majority of cases the blood was not taken into the sanctuary, and therefore the victims had to be eaten by the priests. The people were never permitted to partake of the sin-offering. Thus the priests were made to bear the iniquity of the congregation. See Leviticus x. 16-18. 2. THE SACRAMENTAL PiCTURE. 1. The Introit, the bringing in of the ele- ments, and placing them on the Credence Table, at the beginning of the Eucharistic Service, answer to the Presentation of the vic- tim by the Israelitish offerer. 2. The Confession and Absolution came here in the primitive form of the Liturgy. We must mark the similarity of the ancient con- fession of the English Liturgy, with the form as used in the confession of the Old Covenant. " I confess to God . . . and to you, that I have sinned exceedingly in thought, word and deed, of my fault : I pray . . . you to beseech for me." OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 47 The priest then, after giving the deacon and sub-deacon the Kiss of Peace, went to the midst of the altar, and said silently, with in- clined body and joined hands, " Let us pray. Take away from us, we beseech Thee, O Lord, all our sins, that we may be deemed worthy to enter into the Holy of Holies with pure minds. Through Jesus Christ our Lord." Then rais- ing himself, he kissed the altar and signed him- self, saying " In the Name of the Fathef, and of the Son, and of the Hcly Ghost. Amen." The deacon then put incense in the censer, and said to the priest, " Bid a blessing ; " to which the priest responded, " The Lord, in whose honour this incense shall be burnt, by Him be it blessed. In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." The deacon then gave the censer to the priest, who censed the altar, (i) in the midst, (2) then on the Epistle side, (3) and then on the Gospel side, and lastly he was himself censed by the deacon. In the modern English Lit- urgy the celebrant goes to the north side of the altar (not end) and then says aloud the Lord's Prayer, and the Collect for purity. Then came 48 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL the Kyrie. In its ancient form it was repeated as follows, which was also the form in the Lit- urgy of Edward VI. : Lord have mercy upon u^ (iij). Christ have mercy upon us (iij). Lord have mercy upon us (iij). On certain days the Kyrie had verses, that is, there were verses sung before each Kyrie. On all Doubles, except Principal Feasts, one arrangement might be used containing ten verses. This was unquestionably the origin of the present use of the ten commandments in connection with the Kyrie. After the Kyrie the Gloria in Excelsis was sung. The first Liturgy of Edward VI. con- tinued its use in the ancient place. In all sub- sequent revisions it appears as a post-commun- ion hymn. The reasons for the change were probably the following. If placed after the consecration, an additional petition would do away with the necessity of singing the Agnus Dei. Its burden of " Peace on earth," would naturally connect it with giving of the Pax, and make it an appropriate Hymn to sing after the reception of the peace-offering. From a OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 49 Liturgical and memorial view the change is much to be deplored. After the Gloria came the Collects, the Epis- tie, Gradual, Alleluia and Sequence, the Gos- pel, Creed and Offertory. As these particularly represent the Lamb of God offered a.s the sub- stitute for mankind, they will be examined when we deal with the burnt-offerin- be to Thee, O Lord " (Sarum Missal). The twenty-fourth cL.ion refers to the an- cient use of epistoler and gospeller, who al- ways read the Epistle on the south, and the Gospel on the north side of the altar, agreeably to the ancient place assigned for these lec- tions. OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 77 The canon is important as being the author- ized direction for cathedral use. "In all cathedral and collegiate churches the Holy Communion shall be adminstrated upon principal feast-days, sometimes by the Bishop, if he be present, and sometimes by the deacon, and sometimes by a canon or preben- dary, the principal minister using a decent cope, and being assisted ivith the gospeller and epistoler agreeably according to the adver- tisements published Anno 7, Elizr (Canons Ecclesiastical). The Creed. "At the end of the Gospel, the celebrant moves to the centre of the altar, to say the Creed" (Blunt's Annotated Prayer Book, p. 169). The Offertory. "And when there is a Communion, the priest shall then place upon the table so much bread and wine as he shall think sufficient" (Ru- bric of Authorized Liturgy). The manner of doing this is illustrated by the ancient rubric. The server brought to the celebrant the paten with the bread, and after- wards the chalice. In low celebrations, when 78 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL the elements had not been prepared before the reading of the Gospel, the server handed the cruets to the celebrant, who at the epistle side of the altar poured a sufficient quantity of wine into the chalice and added thereto a few drops of water. He then placed the paten with the bread upon the chalice, and raising the chaHce somewhat in both hands, said privately: "Receive, O Holy Trinity, this oblation which I, unworthy sinner, offer to Thy honour for my sins and off «i lies, for the health of the living, and for the rest of the faithful departed. In the name of iht Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, may this sacrifice be acceptable to Almighty God." There are two authorized prayers used in the Anglican rite. The former is only used at the coronation of the sovereign. The rubric preceding it, and the prayer of obla- tion are as follows : ''And first the Queen offers Bread ^«d?Wine for the Communion, which being brought out of King Edward's Chapel, and delivered ittto her Hands, the Bread upon the Paten by the Bishop that read the Gospel, are by the Archbishop re- ceived from the Queen, and reverently placed OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 79 upon the Altar, and decently covered with a fair linen Cloth, the Archbishop first saying this Prayer: 'Bless, O Lord, we beseech Thee, these Thy gifts, and sanctify them unto this holy use, that by them we may be made par- takers of the Body and Blood of Thine only- begotten Son Jesus Christ, and fed unto ever- lasting life of soul and body ' " (" Maskell's Monumenta Ritualia Ecclesiae Anglicanae," vol. ii., p. 137). The other is the brief form in the Prayer for the Church Militant: "We humbly beseech Thee most mercifully to accept our oblations." Having recited the prayer of the old rite secretly, the celebrant reverently placed the chalice upon the corporal that had been previ- ously spread upon the altar, in the midst thereof, and lifting the paten from the chalice, he placed it before the chalice, where it rested upon the one cross embroidered on the cor- poral. The paten was then covered by turning back the right corner of the corporal over it, and the chalice was covered with the left hand corner, the " pall " being unknown to ancient English use. ^%. ^. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) k A z fe fe 1.0 1.1 i£i2.8 |25 I. IL25 1 1.4 m 1.6 i Hiotographic Sciences (Jorporation V ^\^ <^ %■■"'<*. . The breast was waved backwards and forwards, and towards the right, and towards the left. R. Bechai says : " He moves it for- wards and backwards to Him whose are the four quarters of the world '• (Outram on Sacri- fice, 1. XV. 5). The heave-shoulder was moved upwards and downwards. The importance assigned to waving and heaving is shown by the fact that offerings of various kinds are themselves sometimes spoken of as zaavin^s and /u'avinj;-s{Ex. xxxv. 22, xxv. 2, xxx. 13-15. Num. xxxi. 41, etc.). •'• The fat and the choicest inward parts were laid upon the burnt-offering that was upon the altar. iii. The third part was not apparently sub- jected to any particular ritual action at this stage of the sacrificial proceedings. Subsequently these parts were disposed of in the following manner: i. The wave-breast and heave-shoulder were eaten by the priests in a holy place. io8 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL ii. The parts laid upon the burnt-offering were immediately consumed by the fire which was always burning upon the altar. iii. The remaining portion was eaten by the offerer and his household in the place ap. pointed for the sacrificial meal. 2. THE SACRAMENTAL PICTURE. The special consideration of this section be- gins with the ritual fraction, which answers to the threefold division of the peace-offering. In the ancient Liturgy of the Anglican Church, the fraction was accompanied by certain ritual acts, which are here quoted : '' Here let him un- cover the chalice and take the body, zvith an inclination, placing it over the boiul of the chal- ice, holding it between the thumb and forefingers, and let him break it into three parts, the first fraction xchilst he says, Through the same Thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord, the second fraction whilst he says, Who with Thee liveth and reiiin- eth in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God ; here let him hold the tzuo broken pieces in his left hand, and the third over the top of the chalice OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 109 in his right hand, saying aloud, World without end. Amen. i. The first part answered to the wave- breast and heave-shoulder. ii. The second to the part burned upon the altar. iii. And the third ,0 the portion set aside for the consumption of the offerer and his nouuehold. The fraction was accompanied by the follow- ing ritual actions. '■• The paten was held up by the deacon with outstretched arms and solemnly waved from side to side to the four quarters of the heavens and at the same time it was subjected to an up- ward or heaving motion. This answered to the wavmg and heaving observed in the case of the peace-offerings. Archdeacon Freeman says: "The wavin-^ or movement from side to side has been perpetu- ated m some liturgies, as, for instance, in that of Salisbury, which directed the paten to be waved from side to side to the four quarters " Of the heaving.or movement upwards and down- wards, he says: '• There is one striking action 1 10 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL more especially — anciently common, as it should seem, to all liturgies ; though it has now dis- appeared from some, and is probably miscon- ceived in all — which tends to invest the recep- tion with a very awful character, and to explain yet further the deep reverence here expressed. It is the * elevation ' already referred to. The elements, one or both, were lifted up tow- ards heaven with mysterious words, desiring that they might be received up to God's heavenly and spiritual altar. The words gener- ally used in the East, and which we find also in one Western ofifice, the Spanish, were : * The holy (things) are lifted up to the holy (places).' This desire was sometimes most distinctly ex- pressed in the 'prayer of bowing doww^ as, for example, in the Roman, ' We suppliantly be- seech Thee Almighty God, command these things to be carried up by the hands of Thy holy angel to Thy celestial altar, in the sight of Thy divine majesty ' " {Principles of DivtJie Ser- vice, vol. ii., part, i., p. 175). iii. The part that was burnt upon the burnt- offering was placed thereon in connection with the memorial of the minchah. The second part OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. Ill of the fraction, which was called the manorial, was put into the chalice with this prayer : " Let this most »{• holy union of the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ be to me and all who receive it health of mind and body, and a saving preparation for worthily attaining unto eternal life. Through Jesus Christ our Lord." The im- mission of the consecrated memorial into the chalice was called the commixture. iii. The communicants' portion, being upon the paten, was subjected to the same motion as that of the priests, signifying the royal priest- hood of the Christian laity. Finally, the three parts were reverently dis- posed of as follows : i. The priests consumed their portion. The reader is referred to the Sarum Liturgy for the beautiful prayers which accompanied the priests' reception. ii. The memorial remained in the chalice. iii. The people consumed their portion kneel- ing- During or after the communion the Agnus 112 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL Dei was sung. This ancient hymn was most wonderfully adapted to represent the conjoin- ing and blending together of the characteristics of the sin-offering, the burnt-offering and the peace-offering. *' O Lamb of God ( The Burnt-offering). That takest away the sins of the world, {The Sin-offering). Grant us Thy Peace " {The Peace-offering), 3- THE DIVINE REALITY. The ritual /r^c//^« represents the separation in death of the soul and body of Christ. " The fraction is found in ahnost ^w^xy liturgy, be- tween the consecration and the communion, '.y/;,/. bolizingthe Death and Passion" (Hammond's Liturgies, Eastern and Western, p. 380). i. The ivavingoi the paten towards the four points of the compass brings to mind the voice which cried over the dry bones in the myste- rious valley of bones: -Thus saith the Lord God ; * Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live'" (Ezekiel, xxxvii. 9). The heaving symbolized the return of the soul of Jesus from the place OF THE HOI.V KUCHARrST. 1'3 of departed spirits, which ritually was a motion upwards. ii. Tlie commixture, or placing the memorial into the chalice, represented the soul and body of Christ joined together at the resurrection." " It consists in phicing a small portion of the consecrated bread, or wafer, into the chalice, symbolizing the restoration in the rcsurrcc- Hon of the union of bod\- and soul which had been severed in death ; in a word, pointing to the Risen Life. Though probably not a primi- tive rite, it became nearly universal at an early date (Ibid. p. 378). " The mystical intention of the immission into the chalice is explained by Micrologus : ' Ad dcsignandum corporis et animac conjunctioncm in resurrect ione Christi ' ■ (cap. xvij). And to the same effect Pope Inno- cent : ' Commixtio panis et vini designat nnio- nem carnis et animae quae in resurrectione Christi deniio sunt unitac. ' " ( Maskell's A ncient Liturgy of the Church of England. Third ed. p. 199. Sec also the rubric and prayer in the Liturgy of 5. John Chrysostom.) iii. Jesus ever strengthens His earthly mem- bers by feeding them with His own body and 114 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL blood. His table is always spread, and His ser- vants arc always pressing' His people to come clothed in the wedding garb of righteousness. Three times in the yean at their great feasts, they were obliged to ofTer sacrifices in the tern- pie, and to partake of the peace-offerings : this was in addition to the voluntary offerin^rs which they might offer at any time. The sacrificial scheme outhned. as we have seen, the Passion and Death of our Saviour We have now to inquire into the manner of representing the Ascension and Mediation. The Ascension was outlined by the peculiar ceremonies observed on the day of atonement On this day. the tenth day of the seventh month, the one annual fast-day of strict obli- gation, the high-priest, having offered the daily morning sacrifice, put off his glorious high- pnestly robes, and having washed his body in water, clothed himself in linen vestments worn only on this occasion (Lev. xvi. 4). It will be convenient to deal with the ritual actions observed on this day, in the order employed in describing the sacrificial scheme. iif. The high-priest slew a bullock, as a sin- HF THK HOLY FUCriARIST. 1,5 offering for himself and his household. He then entered into the Holy of Holies, carrying a censer full of burning coals from off the altar"! and with his hands full of sweet incense, to- gether with the blood of the bullock. Bishop Pearson writes concerning this en- trance of the high-priest into the Holy of Ho- lies, as a t; pc of Christ's ascension : " The high- priest under the law was an express type of the Messias and His priestly office ; the atone- ment which He made was the representation of the propitiation in Christ for the sins of the world; for the making this atonement, the high-priest was appointed every year to enter into the Holy of Holies, and no oftener. For the Lord said unto Moses: 'Speak unto Aaron thy brother, that he come not at all times into the Holy Place within the veil, before the mercy-seat, which is upon the ark; that he die not' (Lev. xvi. 2). None entered into that Holy Place but the high-priest alone ; and he himself could enter thither but once in the year, .and thereby showed that the ' high-priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle not made with hands, was to ii6 ■JHK nrVINK MKMOKrAI, enter into the Holy Place, having obtained eternal redemption for us (Ilcb. ix. ii, 12). The Jews did all believe that the tabernacle did signify this world, and the Holy of Holies the highest heavens (Josephus, Ind. Antiq., lib. iii., c. 8.) ; wherefore, as the higii-priest did slay the sacrifice and with the blood thereof did pass through the rest of the tabernacle and with that blood enter into the Holy of Holies, so was the Messias here to offer up Himself, and, being slain, to pass through all the courts of this world below, and with His blood to enter into the highest heavens, the most glorious seat of the majesty of God. Thus Christ's ascen- sion was represented typically" {Exposition of the Creed, Article vi.). S. Luke, xxiv., contains the account of the Lord's Ascension. He appeared unto them and said : " Peace be unto you " (verse 36). This is represented by the celebrant turning to the people and pronouncing : " The peace of God which passeth all understanding." He then " /ed them out as far as to Bethany, and He lifted up His hands and blessed thcur (v. 50). This is represented by the celebrant raising his OK TllK HOLY EUClIAklST. ,,; hands and saying: "And the blessing of God Almighty, the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, be with ynu all cvenrore." " A,u/ it came to pass xvhilc He blessed them. He zvas parted from them ami earried up into heaven' (v. 5 0- In the Eucharistic Memorial the dis- appearance of Jesus is represented by the cele- brant turning to the altar, reverently consum- ing what remains of the sacrament, and takincr the ablutions. This is the literal disappearance of the sacrament, not into heaven above, it is true, but into the living tejnple of God a member of Christ, who even now by virtue of the mcarnation. sits at the right hand of God in the heavenly places. In the sacrificial system of the Old Cove- nant the ascension was outlined, wc have seen, by the disappearance of the high-priest, bearincr mto the Holy of Holies the sacrificial blood and the sweet incense. iv. This appears to be the proper place to describe not only the sprinkling of the blood on the day of atonement, but the wonderful si-r. nification of this ritual action in the threefold sacrifice. 118 tup: divink mkmokiai. When the hif,di-pricst entered into the Holy of Holies, he carried with him '• a censer full of burning coals of fire from off the altar before the Lord, and his hands full of sweet incense beaten small, and " he brought it " within the veil. And he shall put the incense upon the fire before the Lord, that the cloud of the in- cense may cover the mercy-seat that is upon the testimony, that he die not ; and he shall take of the blood of the bullock, and sprinkle it with his finger upon the mercy-seat eastward ; and before the mercy-seat shall he sprinkle of the blood with his finger seven times" (Lev. xvi. 12, 14). Here we have the description of the type of the work of our Saviour in the highest heaven. The type is the sprinkling of the blood and the use of incense. They constituted the great function of the day of atonement and they typify what Jesus, our great high-priest, is now doing in heaven. We must have a clear idea of His work, and how it corresponds with its sac- rificial type. The Creed explains it as a session, "He sit- teth on the right hand of God the Father OF TUL HOLY LUCHAKIST. 119 Almi^rhty." S. Mark says : " So then after the Lord had spoken unto them. He was received up into heaven, and sat on the ri<,rht hand of God" (xvi. 19), and in Hebrews, i. 3, it is declared that Jesus, "when Hehad by Himself pur^rcd our sins, sat down on the ri<,rht hand of the Majesty on hi-h." (Sec also S. Matt, xxxvii. 64; S. Mark xiv. 62; S. Luke xxii. 69; Psalm xvi. 11, etc.) The//rtr^' signifies the absolute power of Jesus in heaven, the honour and glory He has obtained there, after all the labors and sorro.vs of this world, when He rested above in unspeakable joy and everlasting felicity. Bishop Pearson writes as to the "sitting" of our Lord: -We must not look upon it as determining any posture of His body in the heavens, correspondent to the inclination and curvation of our limbs; for we read in the Scriptures a more general term, which signifies only His being in heaven, without any expres- sion of the particular manner of His presence. So S. Paul : 'Who is even at the right hand of God • (Rom. viii. 34) ; and S. Peter : ' Who is gone into heaven, and is at the right hand of God ' " (i Peter iii. 22). Besides, we find Him W I20 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL expressed in another position than that of ses- sion: for 'Stephen looking steadfastly into heaven, saw the glory of God, and Jesus stand- ing on the right hand of God.' ... He appeared standing unto Stephen, whom we ex- press sitting in our Creed ; but this is rather a difference of the occasion, than a diversity of position. He appeared standing to Stephen, as ready to assist him, as ready to plead for him, as ready to receive him " {Exposition of the Creed, Art. vi.). The work of Jesus in the heavenly Holy of Holies is, as far as we are concerned, mediatorial. ''This man, because He continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood. Wherefore He is able to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by Him, seeing He ever liveth to make intercession for them " (Hebrews vii. 24, 25). " Now when these things were thus or- dained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God. But into the second went the high-priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people. . . . But Christ being come an OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST 121 high-priest of good things to come neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by His own blood He entered in once into the Holy Place. . . . For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer, sprink- ling the unclean, sanctifieth . . . how much more shall the blood of Christ, who, through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, purge your conscience ? . . . And for tills cause He is the Mediator of the New Testament." . . (Ibid. ix. 6, 14). If any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous "(i S.John ii. i). '* He IS able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by Him, seeing He ever liveth to make intercession for them " ( Heb. vii. 25). " There is one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus " (i Tim. ii. 5). These passages show conclusively that Jesus' intercession and mediation for us were typified by the blood-sprinkling, and by the burning of incense by the high-priest, in the Holy of Holies, on the day of atonement. JVow the form of the Mediation is altogether sacrificial. S. John sees in a vision of the hea- 122 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL vcn of heavens, in the midst of the throne, and of the four Hving creatures, and of the elders, a- " Lamb standing as it had been slain," and as sacrificially slain, glorified by the heavenly hosts. " Thou wast slain and hast redeemed us unto God by Thy blood." " Worthy is the Lamb that was slain " (Rev. v. 6, 9, 11). The type of Jesus' intercession represents, of course, the divine reality. The high-priest offers the sacrificial blood, and Jesus, the true high-priest, entered into the true Holy of Holies, " not without blood," which He offers, and pleads our acceptance of God by its great virtue. In- deed His sitting, at the right hand of God is contrasted by S. Paul with the standing of the priest of the Old Covenant before the altar executing the duties of his sacrificial calling. Every priest standcth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices which can never take away sins ; but this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins, forever sat down on the right hand of God " (Heb. x. II, 12). On this passage Bishop Wordsworth writes : " Observe the contrast between k'arrjnB (stands), said of the Jewish priests, v. ii, and f tl OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST, 123 the aorist, etiadiae (sat down), said of Christ, and declaring His dignity and continuance, sovereignty and judicature " (Theophyl., (Ecu- men). Bishop Pearson says on the session of Christ : " The bcHef of Christ's glorious session is most necessary in respect of the immediate conseguenee, lohich is His most gracious interces- sion. Our Saviour is ascended as the true Mel- chisedec, not only as the 'King of Salem,' the Prince of Peace, but also as the ' Priest of the Most High God ' (Heb. vii. i), and ivhereas every ' priest,' according to the law of Moses, 'stood daily ministering and offering often- times the same sacrifices, which could never take away sins, this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins, forever sat down on the right hand of God ' (Heb. x. 11,12). And now Christ being set down in that power and maj- esty, though the sacrifice be but once ofTercd, yet the virtue of it is perpetually advanced by His session which was founded on His passion; for He is ' entered into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us ' " (Heb. ix. 24, Exposition of the Creed, Article vi.). The Mediation of Christ in heaven is thus 124 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL seen to be a sacrificial action, and it was an- ciently typified by the presentation of the blood. Without tliis offering or presenting of the blood it was not a sacrifice to God ; therefore this presenting of the blood included, so to speak, the previous death of the victim, and may itself be properly called the sacrifice. This is also true of the sacrifice of Christ. His eternal presentation of Himself was His sacri- licc, so that He should be the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. His presentation of Hi,-, own blood is in the truest sense of the word sacrificial. " As His sufferings were per- fect ni His foreknowledge, so now do they exist perfectly in His mind or memory. So that this presentation of His Passion is far beyond the outward exhibition of the marks of suffer- ing yet retained on the glorified body of the * Lamb standing as slain.' His atoning pains, yet perfectly present in the mind of His Un- changeable Godhead, are by Him now set forth before the mind of His Father just as vividly as the outward signs of them arc now set forth before the hosts of heaven. And so when He offers Himself as the Lamb slain, the mystery OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 125 is not a figure, but a Divine Reality ; but being unspeakable we call it a mystery. If the death of the Jewish victim existed and was included under the presentation of its blood, much more does the Death of the all-atoning Victim ex- ist in the presentation now going on on the throne of God " (Sadler's One Offering, p. 90). The Eucharist is the counterpart of this mys- terious presentation in heaven, because Christ instituted it as such at the very time which iden- tified it with His sacrifice. For when at that Passover He broke the bread and said, " This is my body," He sacramentally identified the bread with the body of the sacrifice, and He then and there said and did what necessitated His sacrifice on the cross the following day, and so in- His divine intention He included His own sacrifice in the eucharistic action. Again, when He ordained the Eucharist He ordained it to be a perpetual memory of His death on earth, and He was then about to make a memory of that death in heaven. Therefore the highest act of earthly worship should correspond with the highest act of I 126 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL. heavenly worship, thus showing the great truth that the Incarnation and Death of Christ have united earth and heaven in the presentation of the one eternal sacrifice once offered on Calvary, and continually presented and pleaded before God for the sins of mankind. May the Church on earth strive to carry out effectually the Lord's will and command in her chiefest act of worship! "Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven." XI. CONCLUSION. I. THE OLD COVENANT IN CONNECTION WITH CERTAIN QUESTIONS OF THE DAY. It was assumed at the begriming that the Church of God is one from the beginning to the end of the world, and that it is one with the Church in heaven. There was one great pattern given for the worship of God's Church, and this pattern was most carefully made after a heavenly model. Later on we get glimpses of the wor- ship in heaven, enough to enable us to see clearly that the lawgiver did indeed form his work in close imitation of the pattern shown him in the mount. The pattern given in the Old Covenant was the only pattern ever given by God for the celebration of public worship, and to that pat- 9 I30 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL tern wc must look for the principal features of .-icceptablc worship. The great test that should be applied to everything in the system of the Christian Church, if this view be a correct one, is this,-does everything con- nected with the Church's system correspond with the prescribed worship and order of the Old Dispensation? For ^ve have, by God's own appointment, a rule of worsh-p to which the worship of the Church in all ages must be referred as an authorized standard. In the foregoing pages an effort has been made to trace the connection which subsist, between the worship of the Old and New Cove nants. There are also some features, which have a peculiar mterest at the present time and on which this comparison throws a strong light. From many questions thus brou-ht prominently to the front, I shall say a few words on certain subjects which appear to me to receive a remarkable accession of light from this method of treatment. I. Under the old Covenant, sacrifice, which prefigured Christ's death, was offered daily. It cannot be soundly argued that in the New OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 131 Covenant, winch specially sets forth the Lord's l^cath m a nearer and truer manner, anythin.^ less than a daily celebration of the Holy Eucnarist can satisfy the ideal of worship held up before us by God Himself in the Mosaic law. It must be with sorrow that the devout fol- lower of Christ views the desolate condition of the majority of our altars. In unloving days the daily oblation was taken away, and iVs rcC toration to its rightful position is making but slow progress, a condition of things which is almost inexcusable in these days when euchar- isfc truth and ritual are everywhere receiving an amount of consideration as marked as it is gratifying. 2. The worship of the Old CovenajU has .n important bearing on what is commonly known as - non-communicating attendance," or what may more properly be termed the " withdrawal of the laity from the Eucharist." This very important subject will be briefly considered from four points of view : i. Its correspondence with the Old Cove- nant. 132 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL ii. Its correspondence with the Death and Passion of Christ. iii. Its relation towards the Eucharistic Me- morial. iv. Its historical authority. (i.) With the Israelites, the attendance of those for whom the sacrifice was offered was imperative. They presented the victim, laid their hands upon its head, confessed their sins over it, and then with their own hands took away its life. After that they witnessed the burning of the burnt-offering, and partook of the peace-offerings. The sacrificial scheme be- ing a type or outline of the one offering of Christ, demanded the presence of the offerer throughout. We cannot imagine such a law- less proceeding as an offerer solemnly present- ing his offering to Almighty God, and then coolly turning his back upon it, going away from the temple, and leaving all the rest to be done by others. The presence of the offerer was compulsory throughout. His withdrawal would be nothing else than a direct insult to the majesty of God. He who refused to accept ni- TUI.; ifoi.Y EUCHARIST. ^35 imperfect offcrin^js at their hands, could „ot receive from them a maimed service, a pro- fessedly crippled memorial. (ii.) There is an unintentional symbolism in the withdrawal of the laity at the offertory It answers to one <,f the darkest passages in the Passion of our Lord, the desertion of His friends, the defection and denial of Peter " I hey all forsook Him and ncd." " Could ye not watch with Me one hour ? " « Will yc also go away?" If the view always main, tamed in the Church that the Eucharist is a solemn memorial of the Death and Passion of Christ, be a true one, then the remarkable co- inc.dence between the withdrawal of the laity from the Divine Mysteries, and the cruel dc. scrtion of His friends, is so startling that the custom should find no one bold enough to de- fend It for a single moment. (iii.) In its relation towards the Eucharistic Memorial the custom complained of can be called nothing less than an unhappy innovation. Mr. Keblesays that the Eucharist '< has two purposes: i. To be a continual remembrance or memory, or memorial, before God as well as 134 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL man, not a repetition or continuance of the sacrifice of the Death of Christ ; 2. To be verily and indeed taken and received by the faithful for the strengthening," etc. {Eucharistical Ad- oration, p. 75). Every member of Christ is in duty bound to make the solemn memorial, and this is the very thing he avoids by leaving the Church at the offertory. If hq be unable from various causes to communicate, let him remember that reception is not the sole object of the Euchar- ist. Several things may hinder his receiving the Divine Mysteries, but nothing can excuse him for neglecting to complete the memorial of the Lord's Death. It is indeed a strange excuse to plead in extenuation of such neg- lect, that non-reception warrants a mutilated memorial / Want of preparation owing to insufficient notice, having received at an earlier celebra- tion, and other similar reasons are sufficient to justify the presence of a communicant at the celebration of the mysteries, although he does not communicate. The blessing attendant on those who press near to touch even the hem of , OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. ,35 His garment, should be sought and lovingly appreciated by the disciples of Jesus. (iv.) Jesus said: " This do in remembrance of me." AH were to make the Divine Memorial. The earliest canons of the ancient Church, which have come down to us, made presence at the Holy Eucharist obligatory on all who were entitled to be present at all. Those who were ineligible were dismissed before the offertory. The earliest evidence of all is that which is contained in one of the very ancient " Apos- tolical Canons." Bishop Beveridge considered that they were made up of decrees enacted by synods in the second century, or at latest, early in the third century, and at once accepted as authoritative rulings. The ninth canon is as follows : "All who enter church and hear the Scrip, tures, but do not remain for the prayer and the Holy Communion, must be excommunicated, as occasioning disorder in the Church." The eighth canon declares that any clergyman who does not partake when the oblation takes place, is to be excommunicated, unless he can suffi- ciently explain his action. We must notice 136 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL that these canons state most positively that the clergyman was commanded to partake of the mysteries, and the layman was to remain "for the prayer and the Holy Communion." The distinction between " partake " and '' re- main," in the earliest evidence on the subject, must be carefully considered. The next item of canonical evidence is con- tained in the Second Canon of Antioch in 341, which is as follows : *' All who attend God's Church and hear the Holy Scriptures, but who do not communicate in the prayer along with the congregation, or turn away from the communion of the Euchar- ist in any disorderly way, are to be cast out of the Church, until, having made confession and shown fruits of repentance, and made en- treaty, they may be able to receive pardon." Theodore Balsamon, the most eminent of Greek canonists, says that this canon does not apply to obstinate defamers and enemies of the sacrament, nor yet to such as from mo- tives of humility and piety do not venture to communicate, but only to such as contemptu- ously go out of church before the time of Com- OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 13; munion, and will not wait to sec it. Bishop Beveridge cites another ancient gloss on these canons : " To say that we all, the faithful laity, the clergy who do not-ona given occasion-touch the sacrament, are bound every day to receive or else be excommunicated, is not enacted by the canon, nor is it pr cticable. And, there- fore, the ninth can .,• ,..ys that the faithful who do not remain are l^ be punished; it does not add those who do not communicate. Thus in- terpret the canon consistently with the Second Canon of the Council of Antioch." Eusebius of Alexandria, about 415, says • " Be early in church. . . . Abide during the Divme and Holy Eucharistic Service, by no means leaving before the dismissal. ... If thou hast thy conscience clear, approach and communicate, . . . but if thy conscience condemn thee, . . . decline the Communion till thou have amended by repentance. But continue during the prayer and go not out of church till thou be dismissed. Remember the traitor Judas; for the beginning of his destruc- tion was his not abiding with them all in the 138 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL prayer. ... If thou goest out before the dismissal, thou imitatest Judas. Wouldst thou be condemned with Judas rather than stay one short hour? It will not hurt thee to remain in church. . . . All that is wanted is patience for a short while, that thy prayer may be completed." A witness in the English Church appears in 668, in a canon ^ of S. Theodore of Tarsus, Archbishop of Canterbury: " When the people come to celebrate Mass in the name of the Lord, they may not de- part from the church till Mass is ended, and the Deacon cries : * //r, mtssa est: " (See the foregoing historical evidence in the Chjirch Times of July 20,27, 1888.) From the fifth and sixth centuries there are numerous enactments on the subject, and at the ti.ne of the Reformation such a proceeding as the withdrawal of the laity was never heard of. The ancient practice was continued after the translation of the Liturgy into English, and there is not one word or scrap of authority con- tained in the Prayer Book which can be pro- duced as evidence that the ancient custom of OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 139 the Church in this respect was to be changed. In the face of the plain declaration in the cate- chism that the Holy Communion was insti- tuted for the " continual remembrance of the sacrifice of the Death of Christ," such a cus- torn is not only contradictory, but it is inca- pable of intelligent explanation. The time has arrived when Catholics must boldly assert the ancient truth as to the necessity of assisting as lay priests at the commemorative sacrifice of the Holy Eucharist. The Catholic position must be maintained : (I.) That the Holy Eucharist was instituted to be a memorial sacrifice of our Lord's Passion and Death, at which memorial all Catholics, not under censure, should assist, at least on Sundays and Holy Days. (2.) That the Holy Eucharist was by divine appointment to be received frequently by the.- faithful, as the only appointed means of sus- taining the life of Christ in the individual soul. (3-) That the object of the Eucharist is (i) a commemoration or representation of Christ's Passion and Death, and His powerful Media- tion for us sinners and all the worid, and (ii) 140 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL for the receiving of the body and blood of Christ by the faithful communicant. It is never celebrated, therefore, in order to have a visible object for worship, z.'s. slanderers declare. Such a course would be an abuse abhorred by Catholics, as it would be directly contrary to the objects Christ had in view in instituting the heavenly sacrament. Still, Catholics wor- ship Christ present in the Holy Eucharist, and deem it one of the holiest privileges ace rded to them, a position maintained by the Church in enjoining kneeling at the reception. 3. The sacrificial system of the Old Cove- nant has also an important bearing on what is known as the eastward position of the cele- brant. The Holy Place and Holy of Holies were situated in the westward part of the tem- ple, and the worshipper entered at a gate at the eastward, seeing before him towards the west the brazen altar for burnt-offerings, beyond which hung the first veil which shut out from view the interior of the Holy Place. The sym- bolism of this has been thought to militate against the eastward position of the celebrant. OF THE lOLV EUCHARIST. 141 and also against the Catholic custom of having the chancels of churches built at the cast end, and of erecting the altars there. The fact is, there w-as an elaborate symbolism connected with the principle of light, the light of day as contrasted with the true Light of the world. Dr. Edersheim tells us in his exhaustive work- on " The Temple, its Ministry and Services " (p. 1 32, note), that the sacrifices were always offered against the sun, that is, looking towards the sun. The morning sacrifice in the temple was offered by the priest facing towards the east. As the Holy Eucharist is always offered in the morning, the eastward position is sim- ply a survival of the ancient sacrificial posi- tion, which was given without doubt by divine authority. Hence also the orientation of the altar. 4. There are many people who have no sympathy with inquiry into the connection be- tween the Worship of the Old and the New Covenants. In their impatience they grandly exclaim : " What have we to do with these beggarly elements? All those things are past ages ago. We will not submit to a yoke 142 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL which neither wc nor our fathers were able to bear." If the ancient sacrificial system consisted of type and outhnc only, then certainly the objec- tion would be a sound one, they would be in- finitely worse than mere beggarly elements; but as leading to a better understanding of Christian principles, they are most valuable guides, as the Apostle has shown once for all in the Epistle to the Hebrews. That they have no teaching value is a posi- tion which goes too far. For this view con- demns the intelligent reading of the Holy Scriptures, which are largely composed of terms which only a careful study of the sacrificial system of the Old Testament can make intelli- gible. If the Scriptures were written " for our learning," no excuse can be urgeu for the sys- tematic neglect of the great study of sacrifice, a subject referred to in every page of the sacred volume, a subject of such importance and of such far-reaching effects, that it has eternally filled the mind of the eternal God, and which enters into all His dealings with our sinful race. OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 143 2. ATTEMPTS TO DIVORCE TRUTH FRC M SYMBOLS. The Bible teaches us that God has ever en- shrined the most vital truths in a system of symbohsm. Men have ever resisted the divine method. Their opposition takes two well- defined h'nes, which are strongly opposed to each other, but which nevertheless agree in the attempt to divorce necessary doctrines from the symbols which represent them. i- In the ranks of Christ's followers are found many, especially in reformed bodies of Christians, who stoutly maintain the truth of Catholic doctrine, but who as stoutly resist the symbols which the Church has ever employed to represent that doctrine. The position thus taken up distinguishes be- tween the media which transmit impressions to the mind, holding the sense of sight to be sin- fully employed if called upon to convey vital truths to the understanding, but strongly main- taining that the sense of hearing is the only legitimate channel through which essential doc- trines are apprehended. This position at once condemns the divinely-instituted worship of 144 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL the Old Covenant, and the glorious ritual al- ways observed in t'he worship of heaven itself. During the past three hundred years tin Church of England has suffered from this persistent effort to separate what God has decreed shall be joined together. Especially in the latter part of this century has there been kept up an intolerant faction determined to " stamp out " every vestige of synjbolism from the worship of Almighty God. In future ages, when the student of church history shall read in the annals of the Victorian days, that iron doors opened and closed upon faithful priests, who languished for montns within prison walls, sep- arated from their flocks, and that even bish- ops were haled before earthly tribunals, and threatened with expulsion from their sees, simply and solely because they persisted in maintaining the principles of divine worship as always observed in the Catholic Church, and specially enjoined in our Liturgy, — when they read of these things, how can they do other- wise than question the candour of these mod- ern persecutors ? Catholics maintain the true principles of ritual, then, because it symbolizes OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 145 the great central truth of Christ's sacrifice for us sinners, and because it was once enjoined upon men by divine authority and expressly declared to be of perpetual obligation to the end of time. ii. The other way by which men seek to sep- arate doctrines from their symbols in worship is even more evil and deadly than the first. There are people who admit the plea for a rev- erent ritual, but who, alas ! content themselves with the outward forms of worship, and care very little for the deep truths they enshrine. In the olden days this abuse was severely reprimanded by the prophets, and when our Saviour came this spirit of formalism, which had then become almost part and parcel of the degenerate Jewish race, brought forth His keenest rebukes and elicited His severest de- nunciations. Then, later on, this spirit proved one of the greatest obstacles to the spread of true religion. East and West alike at times were permeated with it. And in our own days we meet it only too often. One piece of ritual after another is adopted with no higher object than because it is beautiful, or because it is 10 146 TIIK DIVINE MEMORIAL esthetic, or poetical or ancient. They love the ritual for its own sake; they care nothing for the deep truths it enshrines. They talk much about the beauty of symbols, but seldom or never about the beauty of unselfishness, the pure gold of sympathy, or the divine gift of sin- cerity. They say much about correctness of rit- ual, but little or nothing of the purity of heart without which no one can see God. ' But this special danger is not confined to the Catholic Church. What are the vaunted shibboleths of Protestants but the clearest evidence of a dry formalism, as destructive of the true principles of divine worship as the asstheticism of the dilettanteritualist, or the deep selfishness of the Pharisee? So long as human nature is what it is, there will be this great danger of exalting one or other of the elements of divine worship and ig- noring the other ; there will be the temptation to separate them, to divide asunder what God has in His wisdom joined together, and which cannot be severed without bringing the great- est injury to them both. The true Catholic, whilst using and valuing OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. J4; all legitimate symbolism and ritual, feels that the doctrines they teach are of far more impor- tancc than their mere outward expression, that the doctrines are as superior to ther ,:t tal ex- pression as the soul is superior to , he body He admits most fully the paramount .mjvortanca of the divine truths which must enter .: upiy into the hearts and lives of Christ's followers. But he employs a reverent ritual because it is of divine appointment, and consequently of im- mense value in building up his own spiritual life. Because it is of divine appointment he dare not neglect it. On the other hand, the Protestant, whilst believing in the necessity of divine truth, is un- willing to admit the divine authority of any ritual or system of symbolism. It has been the humble endeavour of the writer to show in the preceding pages the unsoundness of this view. Instead of hating forms of worship, and denouncing those who advocate them, the Dible everywhere teaches us that God insti- tuted these outward forms by which He ' chooses to be worshipped, and He severely re- bukes all who either neglect them, or permit 148 THE DIVINE MEMORIAL them to degenerate into mere formalism. The popular Protestantism of the day is unwilling to meet Catholicism half way. It talks loudly and truly of the necessity of unity, but unfor- tunately its unity means nothing less than the abandonment of the whole Catholic position. A careful study of this whole subject will probably lead one to these results : I. The Catholic position as to teaching vital truths by means of ritual is in close accord with the divine commandments. Protestants have no right to disregard the divine command- ments as to the essentials of public worship and set up a standard of their own. If there is to be unity, either Catholics must abandon the divine commandments as to the essentials of public worship, or else Protestants must forego some of the cherished practices their fond hearts have established. II. What a pity to see so much time and labour wasted in profitless jangling, with ene- mies at our very heels who believe neither in God nor any of the doctrines which Catholics and Protestants hold in common. Infidels laugh at the quarrels of Christians, and under a OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. 149 safe cover their sun always shines, and nothing hinders them from making hay to their hearts' content. If we were only united, if our dis- sensions were only healed, the Church of God could move on in her appointed way, overcom- ing everything that opposed her triumphant march through the length and breadth of this wide world, until the command of the Great Bridegroom should be obeyed, till the king- doms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ.