V f. vl "-J. // o / /^ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I La 12.8 ■ 50 "^ |25 IM us lU lit lAO I 2.0 Lil iU 11.6 _Sciaices Corporation y- w A :/. CA ^ <- '^ V <^v \ :\ [V ^ 23 WFST MAIN STREET WE»tTER,N.Y. USSO (716) 872-4503 :■ CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHIVI/ICIVIH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques .--•» Technical and Bihiingraphic Notes/Notes techniques et bibiiographiquet The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checited below. D D D D D D Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur I I Covers damaged/ Couverture endommagie Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaurde et/ou peiiicuiie I I Cover title missing/ Le t'.tre de couverture manque I I Coloured maps/ Cartes g^ographiques en couleur □ Coloured inic (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bieue ou noire) I I Coloured plates snd/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ ReM avec d'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La re liure serrde peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion le long de la marge int^rieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ 11 se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque ceia 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont pas dt6 film6es. Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppldmentaires: 1 t L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a 6tA possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvant modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la methods normale de filmage sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. I I Coloured pages/ D Pages de couleur Pages damaged/ Pages endommagies Pages restored and/oi Pages restauries et/ou peilicuides Pages discoloured, stained or foxei Pages d^coiordes, tacheties ou piqu^es Pages detached/ Pages d6tach6es I — I Pages damaged/ I — I Pages restored and/or laminated/ I — I Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ I I Pages detached/ 1 P o f C b tl s o fi s o Showthrough/ Transparence I j Quality of print varies/ Quality inigale de I'impression Includes supplementary material/ Comprend du materiel suppl4mentaire Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible T si T v« N I b< rii re m Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refiimed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totaiement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, etc., ont 6ti filmtes d nouveau de faqon d obtenir la meilleure image possible. This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est fiimi au taux de reduction indiqu ^ ^.- "•» '^\ *%% *\ V *(■* ^'i *f* , A*-i •*■%■*« , ^ .'U.Yi » 1* * •« i*4'><*> ftt'^ i- ( I can cnl Qwi en .J Juch a '. with a pnfent at a d[ b'ts Jltw a work that he pojlcr'it Bui to the , importc in refpt we 011^ And tl when 1 enjoy ^ t Jhort ti expofe States tion an foverel^ thoufan king cc prejjion thefe Ci with h % ^f i ,.:%>. >\ .:';ai ■■■■%ii »><■ Y ^'r : ADVERTISEMENT. ^ t :i\. A^i^:\: ^ FINISHED piaiire of King George the Third can only be dra'wn by one nvho has lived near hitn^l awl enjoyed the honor of knowning him pcrfonally y fuch a writer will b» able to -enliven his narrative with a thoufand amiable anecdotes to which the prtfent author has no accefs* Living in the woods ^ at a dijlance from hooks and from literary fociety^ his ftuation is not favourable for the compofition of a work of this kind^ he is therefore very fenfible that he has not done iiiflicQ to a chara^er which . po/ttrity will revere, ^v But he is induced toprefenty it^ imperfeEl as it is^ to the inhabitants of Brit fh America for fever al important reafons. The ftuation of this Country . in refpedi to the United States is fomewhat critical ; j we ought therefore to be prepared for the worjl^) And this preparation will be more cheerfully madcy when we recollcEt what precious advantages we- enjoy y and to what evils our fubje&ion^ even for a Jhort timcy to that unprincipled government ^ would expofe us. The ruling party in the neighbourittg ' States think it Orthodox to execrate our Constitu^ tion and to vilify the character of our venerable fovereign. As fander is more aElive than truths thoufands have never heard the name of our good king coupled *with any thing but tyranny and op^ prejjion. Even the bulk of our own popidation in thefe colonies y are but very impffeElly acquainted with his true chara&ery nor have they any opportU" ■•I ' .| ' I H:| ': ) 'I !' 1 \ !J .^i' nity of acquhing the nccejfary information* H'bh tract is intended tofupply^ in fome degree^ this defi- ciency^ and it is hoped that it will enable tbcm^ in future^ to judge more correctly of our fovercign^ he^ caufe it prefents his true likencfs, "' I am alfo flattered with the hope that r'^y pam- phlet^ if carefully read^ will affijl in quieting the 'minds of my fellow fubjetls^ and difjipatc murmufs and difcontent by proving them totally unfounded. Our aged fovereign Jlatids at the head of a confti- tion which requires only to be knowft to be beloved ; its different parts are fo harmoniously combined and incorporated as to produce the greateji pojjible good ; for it not only infures the mojl extenfve civil liberty to every individual^ but preferves all the other properties of a good government^ cMf- patchy fecrecy^ energy ^ wifdom and union. If any fuppofe that Thave fpoken too harjhly of the American Government^ I have no apology to offer. It is obvious that I have chief y in view the dominant fa&ion^ among the people in general ^ there are many individuals of high refpeElability and mor- al worth ; religious^ humane^ hofpitable and friend- ly ^ men who are an honor to human nature, I know feveral of this ev^alted character ^ but the reputation of the nation is fn king, :;^:;.,'>^ / have added a number of notes ^ fome of whick. will be found interefltng, Cornwall, Upper Canada, 17 May, 1810. ' \» '■^-k 'd-- T '4f ^r !♦• /»!'•*«» t>^l4illi ,r !• Jl'l « ' f'^ ^^toyx- •ol'>l -r A DISCOURSE. ^1*' •t T,' ■1*, i»i?: •n^/'" ,;;•■ >..,^;7. ,:.^'Sii;:rP>::'i^'^»^«^ TT^HE acccflion of his prefent Majefty to the Jl^ throne was attended with many pleafing an- ticipations. He was the liift prince of the illuftri- pus houfe of Brunfwick born and educated in Eng- land. To him our language, cur manners and cuftomsj our laws and conftitution, were early fa- miliar, and it was reafonably fuppofed that he would be more attached to his native country than to his eledoral dominions. It mull not be concealed that although the Britiih nation fecured the moft ineftimable advantages by calling the elc(ftor of Kanover to the throne, fome very con- fiderable inconveniences refulted from that happy arrangement. George the Firft was a foreigner, unacquainted v/ith the genius of his new,fubje<£ts, and too far advanced in life ever to become well acquainted with their true intcrefts. His advance* ment to the fovcteignty of the Briti(h empire ap- peared fomcwhat precarious, and it was therefore, jiatural for him to retain his predlledion for his hereditary dominions. In the double capacity of' elector of Hanover and king of Great Britain, he frequently found himfelf very awkv/ardly fit- uatcd, and unable to a^St in fuch a manner as to pleafe both his Br'iilh and German fubjedts. His I si : si l'!-i| Mi n ."( ■ ' f abilities wcreinde d excellent, and he came with the beft intentions to the throne, but he had the misfortune to fall into tbe hands of a vigorous but implacable fadlion, and rather appeared for fome time the head of the Whig party than the illuf- triouschief of a united, powerful and loyal nation. George the Second, with lefs ability, was ftill more attached to his eledlorate, and during his reign, the Britifh thought that they were involved, with- out any neceifity, in every continental difpute. From being auxiliaries, tley commonly bee me the principals in different wars, and were obliged to l>ear the moft enormous burdens in order to pay nations for hghting their own battles. ,/rhefc opinions, whether corre' .; V marriage, that bond of happinefs, that golden chain which foftens and humanizes man, which expands his benevolent afFedlions, and preparcvS, for him, new and more endearing duties, is pol- hited or even tarnilhed,what terrible confequences enfue — -the feeds of perpetual difcord are engen- dered — ^families are rent in funder, the mofl im- placable animofities are produced, children are brought up in vice and infamy, and the pureft fources of felicity are dried up forever. Nor is it enough that the purity of this connexion is en- forced by revelation as well as reafon, if thofe in tjie higher walks of life are found guilty. To them it belongs, in a peculiar manner to enforce the practice of virtue, by example ; it is an im- perious duty which their fituation and intereft ef- pecially demand ; a duty performed by our be- loved fovereign in the moft perfedl manner ; he confiders his royal confort's honour and peace of mind his own, and never .<;^afes to treat her with the moft cordial love. Behold him the father of/a' numerous offspring, anxious to form their minds to virtue and religion, to make them ufeful to their country, the guardi- ans of its honour, and the terror of its enemies. Rewarded for his eagernefs to infpire them with the pureft principles of integrity, he has already feen them f^anding forward the ftead pillars of the conftitution,and the pride of th^Britifh nation. Is it credible that this beloved monarch would have poflellcd the fame influence over his people that he now enjoys, that he would have been en- fhrinrd in their hearts, and always mentioned rSfe 'V- ^ -i .: :: .' p^ 12 with the warmcft veneration, had his condu6t heen different Had the outfct of his life been mark- ed with vicious diflipation, had thofe hours which he fpent at home with his children and amiable confort been confumed in difgraceful revelry or in the arr^s of a miftrefs. No, it is impoffible — it is contrary to experience, contrary to the nature of man. Virtue poflefTes an extenfive power over the human mind ; if its diredt force cannot always be traced, it is eafy to viev/ it in the con- traft. In vain is a man endowed with the mod brilliant talents, if his morals are impure. He may fpeak eloquently of ji*ftice, of truth, and of virtue ; — he may attack exifting abufes with the moft pointed energy ; — he may profefs the moll incorruptible integrity, the moft fmcere love for his country, and the greateft anxiety to promote its profperity and glory. But he fpeaks to the winds ; his words are forgotten ; they are never felt — ^they flow from a corrupt fountain, and in his mouth good appears evil. It is this coincidence between his public and private charadler, that enables our gracious fove- reign to eftabliih his throne in the hearts of his people. They believe all his profeffions, for his adlions prove their fmcerity and truth ; and they willingly furrender their aifedions to a fovereign whofe greateft ambition is to render them happy. What is fo lovely, fo venerable and fc delightful, as the contemplation of fuch a king ? What mon- arch ever defervedfrom his people greater admi- rtation, gratitude and love ? Is it then any wonder that his authority is maintained rather by confi- one T J 3 "-'v' dence, affedlion and efteem, than by his greatncfs and power ? Perhaps the difficulties under wliich kings la- bour in acquiring a proper education, and the nu- merous temptations to which they are expofed, render tlieir virtues more confpicuous, and more worthy of veneration. This may be, and cer- tainly is the cafe with other fovereigns ; but our monarch requires no indulgences of this kir.d ; his merits reflecS infinitely more fplendour on his fit- nation than they can pofTibly receive. Penetrated with the moft ardent but rational piety, he re- gards the Supreme Being as the common Father of ail, and mankind the children, the members of one family. He is not therefore puffed up with vain glory as if he were an independent being and his fubjefts beneath his regard ; he looks up- on them as his children who turn to him for pro- tection, and to promote whofe happinefs becomes the firft of his duties ; and it is this conviction that determines him always to prefer the public to private good. No wicked king can ever deferve or poffefs the affections of his fubjeCts ; he may govern by fear, but never by love. His people may be loud and fendle in their exterior demonftrations of refpeCt, but thefe are never founded upon confidence and efteem. It is impoffible to venerate a man who degrades himfelf, and who has loft all refpeCt foi: the Supreme Being. If religion and virtue have loft their power over him, what ftiall reftrain him or what (hall prevent him from violating the moft facrcd rights and liberties of his people ? To no :i \ i ! 't : ij:' I 'W t , \ purpofe will fuch a monarch fubftitute parade and Iplendour, the tinfel of falfe glory and the glitter of unjuft conquefts for the folid virtues of the head and heart ; thefe may dazzle the people^ but can never beget their veneration. Our fovreign is better acquainted with human nature ; he knows that his ftation alone will nev* er procure the love and veneration of his fubjeds ; Thefe muft be derived from his perfonal condu^. We muft be attached to the man, we muft be convinced of his integrity and piety, before we can furrender him our affedlions, and before obe- dience to his commands becomes our honour and delight, as well as our duty. * Such, my friends, is our fbvercign in private life ; and were his fubjeds to follow his example, what confequences would enfue. The nation would be virtuous, and a virtuous nation is always powerful. Were the Britilh to imitate the con- du(St of the king, and make a point of fucceeding in that imitation, where ftiould we find a man a- mongthem unworthy of confidence, deftitute of probity, or intemperate in his living ? Juftice and integrity would cover us as a garment ; punctual in our dealings and in the performance of promif. %es : affeclionate hufbands, indulgent parents, not admitting that criminal indulgence fo fatal to chil- dren, but that regular and yet tender difcipline which becomes the foundation of future excel- lence. Pious without hypocrify, more attentive to the fpirit of religion than to idle diftindlions, yet careful to prefervc thofe exterior ordinanceg * See NoTS III. '^hich (he retains as her outworks, but without parade or oitentation. Were we to model our lives by the condudl of our fovereign, corruption and venality would hide their heads, and s}\ would be cheerfully obedient to the laws. Inftead of pride, cruehy and opprefllon, chriftian charity would reign, each would embrace his fellow fub- jedt as a brother deferving of his confidence and friendfhip. As no vicious charader ever had ac- cefs to the king, fuch would be hunted'from foci- ety, and the irreligious fpurned as the corrupters of the public happinefs. AU would be convinced that he who is falfe to God would prove fo to man ; that hatred to religion proceeds from levity or ig- norance, from a corrupted heart or a perverfe un- derftanding. The friend of man muft be the friend of religion, for religion is the moft fruitful fburce of our enjoyments. -^^ In becoming chriftians as he is a chriftian, we fhould fuffer no vice to harbour in our fouls, but be forever endeavouring to acquire fuperior wif- dom and purer morals, and to diftinguilh ourfelves by our virtues from thofe who are not chriftians. Then ftiould we love God with fervent devotion, fearing him as a good child fears his father, and cheerfully fubmitting ourfelves to his will. In all our f'^cial relations, we ftiould be diredied by jus- tice, lenity and kindnefs : careful to cultivate meeknefs, forbearance and brotherly love ; and to difcharge, with fidelity, the duties of our particu- lar ftation. Such would be the fubjeds of our beloved fovereign, were we to follow his example. He li-'l 'i the intercourfe Mrhich tlicy regulate, and experience has proved their utility, before they are publicly recognized. To feek for liberty, even in the firft ftages of fo- ciety, is to feek for a calm in tlie mid ft of a tem- peft. Are the barbarians fr^e who a61: by the ca- price of the moment, who are governed by their paflions and the cravings of their appetites ? He then \yho will take the trouble to refled, muft clearly perceive, that without fociety we cannot enjoy liberty. What I poffefs another may take away ; my freedom depends not fo much on my own reftraints as upon the reftraints of others in refped: to me. Now in a good government thefe reftraints are the laws — rand what do I lofe or fiu*- render by becoming obedient to thefe laws ? Nothing : for by them my liberty is extended and fecured. We do not ^njoy what another may take away— and what is fecure in a rude fociety ? but civil liberty cannot be taken away by any in-* dividual, for we have the ftrength of the whole fociety on our fide. The reftraints ti erefore im^ pofed by a good government are only the fove- reignty of good laws, the reftraints of fotjnd prin- cipl^ji, and the commands of duty. The word liberty has been fo much proftituted that we are in danger of lofing its true ineaning 5 m wi 20 fi' for it 18 a melancholy truth, that the fcience of good government and the principles on which it refts are much lefs known now than they were a century ago, notwithft^nding the empty declama- tions which have diflurbed the world fince tlie American revolution, about freedom and equal rights. Nothing is more ahfurd than to fuppofe a natipn free, becaufe it poflelTes a written conllitu- tion \vhich is ttftle regarded in practice. Before a people can be called free, their freedom muft have been tried. It muft have given permanent proofs of its health. It muft have braved the n^oft ter« rible ftorms — weathered the attacks of tyranny on the one hanc}, and of fadion on the other. An4 what is more, this freedom muft have become the foundation of the pyblic manners — it muft have ftamped itfclf on the people who enjoy it. And fuch is the freedom of the Britifti nation ; it has undergone all thefe trials, and it has been trium-. phant. That magnanimity, that opennefs and in- dependence of charader, by which this nation is, diftinguiftied, prove its freedom. That generofi- ty, fmcerity, bojdnefs and energy ihew that op- preflion is unknown ; and that urbanity, harmony and order, free from flavifti fear or den\ocratic barbarity, and anarchy, difcover that this freedxD.m is wifely direded. Does any perfon doubt wheth- er the Britifti be the freeft nation on earth, let him tell me where property and its rights, are fo. well proteded. This is the life and foul of liberty. What ftiall oppreffion feize. when prpperty is. fecure ? Even a tyrant will not he wicked for nothing ; but the motives and bbjeds; are zcy 21 i(* irtoved, and t!ie feed of oppreffion deflroyeJ, when property is fafc. By this, life and liberty are rendered facred. And has our gracious fovereign ever endeavour- ed to abridge this liberty or to extend his prerog- ative at th^ expence of the people ? Has he not pn the contrary proved the watchful guardian of their interefts, and holding the balance between the npbility and commons, become their common father, and demonftrated by a reign of fifty years» that a limited monarchy is the beft of govern- pients ? . But let us follow him in the exercife of the dif-. ferent branches of his prerogative. As fupreme niagiftrate his firft care is the regular adminiflra- tion of juftice. This power he delegates to the judges, and in the courts over which they prefide every thing is carried on in his name. Has he ever tried to turn this prerogative to the augmen- tation of his power ? So far from this, that we have feen him coming forward voluntarily to make the judges independent of the crown. For- merly they were during plea^fure j now they are during good behaviour. And they have become, to all intents and purpofes, the arbitrators between the king and his people, for they are independent of both. This Angle meafure is fufficient to im^ mortalize George the Third,^had he done nothing elfe, for he has rendered it impoffible for him or his fucceflbrs to have any influence over the judg- es. Neither have thefe judges any power but what is given tb^m by the laws, nor can they pafa apy lentence till the matter of fadt has been fettled r ■t :i;i 22 by men chofcn by the parties. All private feel- ings, and confeqiicntly all rcfpedl of perfons arc banifhed from the Biitilh courts of juftice. Thofc who arc accjuainted with human natr»fe are able to appreciate this concefTion of the king. In re- nouncing for himfelf and his poftcrity the power of difplacing the jadgcs at the commencement of a new reign, he put the finifhing hand to the col- ftitution, and by founding it on the pureft jullice, gave it the faircfl chance to become eternal. Such a facrifice has been rarely made. Even virtuous \ kings arc careful to preicrve their authority and influence unimpaired, and rather inclined to aug- ment than diminifh their power. In every country except Britain, to be profecut- ed by the government is to be condemned. That this is the cafe under the prefent defpotifm of France, no perfon will have the boldnefs to deny^ And in the United States, which have borrowed all that is valuable in their inftitutions from BritT ain, but which they have poifoned or deform- ed by their crudities, fadtion produces the fame ef- fedls as the eruel tyranny in France. But we Ihall he told that as the purity of Britifh juftice pflcn- tially depend* upon t!:e trial by jury, that pillar of liberty ; and as our neighbours poflefs that tri- al in its full purity, why th^n can we aflert that their adminiflration of juftice is corrupt ? We an- fwer, that in England, generally fpe^king, the peo- ple are pofTefled of moral habits ; they are trem- )t>lingly alive to every thing that can affedt their reputation, and they have a ftroug veneration fo religion. But if there be a nation where neithc religi wher deriOj falfeh princ advan the tri not n the fc caufe oppon dent, J Libert empty or is \ fadtioi Let a jury religi o will hi give it or fecn amoun fubjed reded this thi is no i make i truit w pulous ons the they 01 23 fo the, religion, virtue nor reputation are much fcgardctl, where democracy has corrupted the heart by ren- dering it famihar with deception, where political falfehoods are confidcrcd meritorious, and the principles of honour and integrity difrcgardcd to advance a friend, or ruin a rival — in fuch a nation the trial by jury has loft its advantages. And is it not notorious that in that unhappy country, hj the foolifli called free, every man confiders his caufe loft, if the jury be compofed of his political opponents? And the judges not being indepen- dent, are or may be as eafily fwayed as the juries. Lil>erty in fuch a country becomrg worfe than an empty name, a mafk for opprcflion j the law lleeps or is wrefted from its purpofe, and the reigning faction becomes irrefiftible.* Let it ever be remembered that the excellence of a jury entirely depends upon the purity of their religious principles. If a man fears not God, will his oath bind him, and will he not readily give it up to friendftiip, to intereft, to folicitation or fecret malignity ? In England the laws are par- amount, the king has never oppreflTed any of his fubjedts ; his adminiftration has always been di- reii of the national church had rendered neceffary. Many fevere laws had been ertaded againR the Catholi s, v;ho were fuppofed the friends of the banifhed family, and the DiiTcntiers, by forlaking the eftab- liOied church, deprived themfelves of many valu- able privileges which their fellow fubjeds enjoy- ed. But no foiDtier did thefe dangers diminifh, than the king cheerfully concurred in leflening the re- ftridions. From the reign of king William to that of our prefent Ibvereign, the Catholics of I England had laboured under many privations, with a filenceand patience which at ]?ength excit-j ed the attention of the nation. The parliament therefore, in conjundion with the king, removed thofe grievous penalties which had been impofed for the prefervation of the conftitution, then ftruggling into birth. That liberal fpirit of chrif- tian charity which animates our king, made him rejoice in promoting luch a meafure, and eager to repeal laws which were calculated (now thatl rnaje Ar fo rci ures wliic! 30Vd L the ^hig ticn^ Lially lad at niich irinjg Aoriy Stu- if the Many loU s, liflied eftab- valu- mjoy- ,, than he re- am to OS of itions, excit- ament noved pofed then chrif- le him eager iv that I ^■5^ . ■ '• ■ then* caufe was removed) to deftroy all focial and religious obligations, to poifon the fources of do- meftic felicity, and to exthiguifh evjry principle of honour. The favour which had been (hewa to the Catholics in 1778 was extended to theDif- fenters in 1779. Our gracious fovereign, anx~ loully difpofed to give every relief to h.^s fiihjedts, moft readily affented to the bill prefented by his parliament, for relieving this clafs of citizens from many painful reftridions. The fame chriftiart fpirit of love ftill farther extended the bounds of toleration in 1791* The Pope, fo long the terrour of the world, had now funk into weaknefs and contempt. The Catholics themfelvcs had difa-r vowtc' thofe principles which were moft obnox- ious or dangerous to Proteftant ftates, and it was no longer necefiary to enforce the laws which had been made againft them : on the contrary, the zeal and attachment which they had frequent- ly manifefted for the king and conftitution, mer- ited encouragement and reward. In 1793, the Catholics of Ireland were more favoured than even their brethren in England i and except their exclufion from fome confidential places in the executive government, and fitting in parliament, no rcftridion whatever was con- tinued. Indeed the moil generous fyftem of con- ceffion and conciliation hath charaderized his rnajefty's adminillration. Ana while we praife our virtuous fovereign for fo readily afientlng to all thofe conciliating meaf- ures which feryed to allay i>",ligious controverfi.es' which, while they left the coijTlItution fecure in D ^ ' •' tf? 46 cliurch and ftat.e. added much to the comfort and happinefs of thofe whom they relieved, we are called upon no lefs cheerfully to praife him for refifting a farther conceffion which he conceived dangerous to his government. Whatever be the opinion of fome individuals concerning the propriety of Catholic emancipa- tion, the king's firft motive for refofmg his con- currence is in the higheft degree honourable. He confidert*, and perhaps juftly, that fuch a meafure is inconfiftent with h:s coronation oath* This fcrupulous adherence to the fandity of an oath, hath fecured the gratitude and admiration, the af^ fedlion and confidence of all ranks of men, even of thofe who conceive themfelves fufFerers bv his firmnefs, and ail regret the advanced age 6f our venerable fovercign, who rifes in virtue as his^ years increafe. Here we have a facred pledge of the excellence of his moral principles and the fervour of his pi- ety ; and to fliew that he was actuated on this occafion by the pureft motives ; on being in- formed many years ago that the Catholics in Scot- land were too poor to fupport their clergy, he be-' flowed upon their priefts a fmall annual penfion, which he quadrupled to the bifhops. But the claims of the Catholics to total emanci- pation, may be refufed on the ftrongeft grounds. "While this body acknowledge the fpiritual jurif- didion of the Pope, they ad diredly in oppofi- tion to one of the fundamental dodrines of Britifh liberty, which we ratify with an oath, ** that no foreign prince, perfon, prelate, ftate or 1^ lirir- f o iath, le cr 27 >€.kr potentate, hath or ought to have any jurifdidion, power, fiipefiority, pre-eminence or authority ec- clefiaftical or civil within thel'e realms." As long as the Catholics acknowledge a foreign jurifdic- tion, their church may become as much a polit- ical as it is a religious inftitntion. How can they be depended upon in all cales as to the ftate, when their confcienccs are under the direction of a clergy who are bound by oath to obey the Pope ? And is not the prefent Pope the creature, or rather the 1 ubjed: of our public and mod inveterate enemy, who exercifes the power of difpenfmg with oaths, and of diflblving people from their allegiance ? This is a formidable objeftion to all further con- ceflions to the Catholics. The fame liberality which has been fo merito- rioufly granted to religious feds was alfo extend- ed to political relations. The kingdom of Ireland had always been governed with, a rod of iron ; the jealoufy of the Britifh parliament had impof- ed reftridions on her trade and commerce at once opprelTive, cruel and abfurd ; but durin^^ *his happy reign they have been gradually removed. lion, I In 1 778, a fmall beginning was made, but jealoufy choked it in the bud, In 1 780, good fenfe pre- Iluci- I vailed,^ a^d the trade of Ireland was placed on a liberal footing. It was no longer treated like an infant colony, and bound by unnatural reftridtions. In 1782, the Britifh parliament renounced all [power over that of Ireliund, declaring it free and lindependent ; and at the fame time the king fig- [nified his intention of furrendering many import* mt parts of his prerogative $ and this magnanim- S n. : ' m 28 l-^'r ity was received with acclamation and gratitude by that high minded nation. In 1783, thefe conceflions were farther fanc- tioned by a law exprefsly enacted for the purpofe of difclaiming forever all right in the Britifh par- liament to legiflate for Ireland. Other advantages were given to the Irifh ; but fuch was the unhap- py fituation of that people, that they could make no ufe of them. Divided among thcmfelves, and governed by a junto which was equally deaf to the vcice of the government and of the people, no folid relief could be given but by uniting the two kingdoms. This grand raeaiure, which con- folidates the empire, hap/ been at length carried into effedl, and is one of the moft glorious events of his majefty's reign. Indeed no meafure could be mere judicious or neceffary. The inhabitants of the three kingdoms are at length placed on an equal footing, and not feparated as they former- ly were by abfurd regulations. United under one legiflature, mutual jealoufies are deftroyed, and the advantages of fiee trade and commerce are open to all Our gracious king appeared determined to bury, if poffible, the laft remains of political ani- mofity ; he had already reftored the forfeited ef- tates inScotlandto the families which had loft them in the rebellion, and, in 1800, with a promptnefs in the higheft degree cordial and generous, he granted a penfion of £ 4000 per annum to Hen- ry Stuart, cardinal of York, (when reduced to ab- folute beggary by the robberies of tjie revolution- ary French) the laft branch of the illuftrious but mg unfortunate family of the Stuarts, although the cardinal had had the weaknefs to aflert his title id the throne. But the national profperity, and the comforts and happinefs diffufed by the impartial adminif.* tration of our beloved king, would have received^ a mortal ftab, had not our finances been cured of that decrepitude into which they were finking :i national bankruptcy, a moft dreadful calamity,' was ferioufly apprehended by men of experience and per tration ; numbers thought it unavoidable, f atid many had prophefied the time of its happen-* ing — ^the king therefore united his exertions with > thofe of his miniftry to find out a remedy for this impending evil. It was Mr. Pitt's good fortune to difcover a plan which difpelled the rifmg gloom, and whofe efficacy difplays in the ftrongeft light, ' the greatnefs of his genius ; it infures for him the gratitude of the nation, and clothes him with im-> mortality. By means of a fmking fund provifioii is made for gradually liquidating the former debts in a manner at oiKe iimple and efFe6tuai, and reft- ' ing upon principles certain and uniform in their operation, as has been incontrovertibly proved by an experience of twenty years. But it was not enough to remove the danger arinng from the debts of former wars ; the minifter made it im- poflible to contract a new debt, without at the fame time providing the means of difcharging it iir a moderate period. In thefe judicious arrange- ments, the king moft readily concurred ; and the ' confidence which a fyftem fo perfed has infpired, hath greatly increafed the enterprife and exertion* • i ; $ p^ f i \ J I I 3« of the people. Our national rcfourccs* being thus improved, every pcfllhle encouragement has been given to trade, navigation and manufadures, and the public ptqfpcrity hath moft wonderfully in- crcafedf Thefe and many other judicious regulatioUvS, it is true, may be afaibed to Mr. Pitt ; but the king fhares the merit for feledliug and keeping fuch a minifter. The dread of the national debt feema now tq be fubfiding, though to fome it is Hill a fubjedt of gloom and defpair : but fuch fears are not well founded ; for a ftrid: examination will prove that our enorm^.us taxes are the natural confequences of the greatnefs of our wealth. It was referved for the prefent reign to put an end to a trafBc which had long been a difgrace to the nation and to all Europe, a traffic which gave currency to the moft favage opinions, which occa- iioned the moft dreadful crimes, which put all moral law to defiance, and which fubftituted the dominion of force for that of reafon. The blood of the innocent Africans no longer cries to Heaven againft us. Commerce has been taught to refpei9£^lll lie 31 ^'^ ■ • ■ juft and neceflary wars. He was not able to in- fpire other nations with that moderation and love of order which animated his royal brcaft ; and found it neceflary to maintain the honour of the nation by repelling unjuft and unprovoked aggreffions. The firft of thefe was the Colonial or American war, the origin of which is to be found in the peace of i 763. Had our beloved Sovereign consented to rcftore Canada to France, the dates of America had fiill been colonics.-— Poflefled of the navigation of the lakes, and claiming a paflage to Louifiana, the French would have kept the Americans in continual alarm, bar- railing theif frontiers and making encroachments Upon their territories. Incapable of defending themfelves againft a nation fo powerful, they would I'ave anxioufly maintained their connec- tion with their mother country, and would Have willingly contributed their fhare in the expencc neceflary for their protection. But no fooner are they relieved from impendii-g danger thaa they turn upon their protecStor and fling the hand that faved them from deftrudtioii. It is not ne- ceflliry to enter minutely into the caufe and ori- gin of the American war.* Future hiflorianswill do juftice to Great Brita'yi when the mania for undefined liberty and liccntioufners fliall have paflfed away. It is fufficient for us to remark, that they made a difmal return for tlio miUion$ fpent in their quarrels, and for the blood that bad flowed in torrents. They proved themielvcH nei- ther affedionate children, grateful c^lpnU?, nor ■■' ^ii«ii.,. t > vv :;^ii 1' 1. ! ' I lil ,1^***^^ t ! I ^ friendly allies. I rejoice however in their fepara- tion ; they had become an intolerable burthen to the Britifh nation ; they drew the attention of the government from internal improvements (of infi- nitely more utility) to the fofterinjc; of infidious colonics ; and fmce this cxcrefccnce has been cut off, the Britifli iflt s have advanced mofl: rapidly in ftrength and prolperity. No Englilhman has canfe to blufli on account of this war ;^ it was excited by faction, and became fuccefsful through treachery. But the moft unfortunate event of the prefent reign is of a more general and deftrudtive tendenr cy, and is common to England with all Europe^ The revolution in France has been the i'courge of the world fincc its commencement. This dread- ful convulfion was accelerated, if not entirely produced, by the rebellion in America. The dif- cuflions to which this fmgular conteft gave rife, and the countenance granted by Louis XVI. to fubjedls in arms againfl their lawful fovereign, erafed from the minds of a great portion of his people that reverence and devotion for royalty, with which they were formerly infpired. Thei'e imprefTions were extended and confirmed on the return of the troops which had been fent to A- merica. The gifts of freedom were painted in the moft fafcinating colours ; the flame of blind en- thufiafm w^as kindled in their brcafts, and a defire for liberty excited which nothing could extinguifh. Indeed the king of France figned his death wai*- rantf and the ruin of his race when he figned the ♦See Notes VII. and VIII. t See Note IX. ii treaty with the rebellious colonics. He fiifTci'ecl jealoufy to conquer prudence, and rejoiced in the opportunity of humbling a rival. It were eafy to allign the caufes which made the revolution of France more favage and more dangerous to other nations than that of America, but here it would be out of place. Our virtuous foVereign faw with concern the dreadful anarchy which pervaded that unhappy country, and the fhockiiig maflacres which were eVery day per- petrated, but he determined to preferve his neu- trality, having laid it down as a maxim not to interfere with the iiiternal arrangements of other nationsi But the arrogance and ambition of the Ephenieral rulers of France, foon left him noth- ing but fubmiffion or refiftanc^ ; and after they had Ithbrued their hands in the blood of their humane and pious fovereign, it was vain to ex- peO: juftice. Indeed the murder of their king roufed the tender" feelings of the whole Britilh nation ; intercourfe with France was fufpended, and the National Convention haftened to declare war. With refpedt to the policy of a war with France, a diiFerence of opinion at firft prevailed. But whoever traces the progrefs of this terrible cOrtVulfion, mull be convinced that it was impof- fible to maintain the relations of peace much longer. The rage for innovation was daily gain- ing ground and might in a ihort time have overturned our happy conftitution. The French revolution prefcnted a fpedlacle altogether new. Its fartguinary progrefs, its early attempt to over- turn the Chriftian religion. The hopes it offer-* E • i -'sU 34 cd to the (Iiraffeded in all nations, and the zeaf which it exerted to increafc them, juftified the kins: in breakincr off all communication with a country, where the revolutionary fervour carried every thing before it. At this period the Titua- tion of the Britifh' empire was in the highefl de- gree critical, and it was difficult to decide which courfe to purfue. Subfequent events have how- ever juftilied the choice that was made, by prov- ing tliat a neutrality, had it been poflible, would have been infinitely more deftrudtive than the moil: furious war. What has Spain gained by her patient alliance,her humiliations and facrifices? What the king of Pruffia for his temporifing and- infidious policy ? What the Dutch for their mean- nefs and condefcenfion ? Has Switzerland itfelf, formerly fo virtuous and free, efcapcd the rage of conqueft and revolution I And if I be aiked what WE have gained, I anfwer, we have gained fecu- rity, w^e have preferved our happy oonftitution, we have maintained the purity of the public mor- als. Yes, t'.at probity which teems on the con- tinent of Europe to be loft, ftili diftinguilhes the Britifh charader. That abhorrence of fraud and falfehood, that dignified independence which ev- ery perfon feels, who is conscious of the equal protedion of the laws— that difdain of all fawning fervility and meannefs, which the flaves of tyrants m aft put on, ftill adorn the Britifh nation. Had it not been for the war, we might have become equally, degraded with our enemies, deprived of our rights, all fccurity of perfon and property an- nihilated, and been found bowing at the feet of "N 35 one of the Corfican ul'urper's fatellites. Such a tyrant would have trampled on our laws, on our jeligion and civil policy ; he would have enforced with the moft unrelenting cruelty, the inoft arbi- trary and opprefTive meafures. Hating that love of liberty, of honour, and of virtue, implanted in our nature, he would have taken every method to debafe our minds. This would have been the exchange that we Ihould have made for the gra- cious lovereign whom we now praife. Inftead of his paternal afTedtion, his ardour to incrcafe our happinefs, his mild and faithful adminiftration of the laws, we Ihould have found ourlelves groan- ing under a government of murder, a military defpotifm covered with corruption, at war with the virtuous, and deluging the kingdom with the blood of her moft amiable children. Ruin and mifery would have overfpread the land 5 the laft afylum of liberty would have been deftroyed ; the light of the world extinguiihed, and oppreffion in her moft dreadful attire would have been fecn founding her victorious trumpet of horrour and difmay. From evils fo dreadful we have been preferved by our watchful fovereign ; and while other nations have fallen, we remain fecure, hap- py and fiee. He has conduced the vefl'el of the ftatq with a fteady hand, and he continues victo- rious, There is hov/ever one errour, which, though flowing from a generous intention, has produced much evil and perplexity. The feverity of our maritime laws is the oftenfible pretence for arming all Europe again ft us j but unwifc relaxations of 3<5 thefe are the real foiirce of our prcfcnt difRculty, III the year 1756, Lord Chatham dilbovering that France, unable to rcliil our naval prcponder- ;ince, had relaxed her colonial fyllen), and per- mitted neutrals to bring lion^e the produce of her colonies, which was done exclufively by her own Ihips in time of peace ; and perceiving that the prcfTure of the war would be thus leflened, adopt- ed a rule by which the admiralty were to guide their decifions to counterad her defign. The rule was, That a neutral has no right to deliver a belli" gerent from the prejjiire of its enemies^ bojlilities^ by trading with his'^colotiies in time of war in a way that was prohibited in time of peace J^ , The fairnefs of this rule muft be admitted by every impartial perfon ; and its obvious tendency is to accelerate the return of peace : it was aded upon by Lord Chatham, and found efficacious.. But fince his time, the clamours of felhfh neutrals have extorted a relaxation, as if the enforcement offo juft a principle were contrary to morals. The firfl: confequence has been, that the hoflile colonies have found a benefit rather than a difad- vantage in the war ; they were never more flour-- ifhing, and their produce never flowed into the mother country in fuch abundance, with fo great cheapnefs, and in fo great fecurity. The navy have heen thus deprived of their lawful prizes, the manufadlurers of the enemy find employment, his taxes arp rendered produ0.ive, and he is ena- bled to continue the conteft. But the fecond clafs of evils arifmg from this ♦Se.e Notes XIV. XV. XVJ. sr injudicious relaxation qf our maritime laws arc Hill greater. The Americans becoming the car- riers between the lioftilc countries and their colo- ;iics have riien to a height at prpfpcrity which hatli made tliem infoleat ar;d captious, and not being able to navigate their vaft fhipping, they entice our Icamen froni; the fervlcc of their coun- tiy. And fo far arc they from being fatisfied with the relaxations already made that they de- mand ftill greater, fucl^ as muft quickly under- mine our ni;val power. They detain our failors under pretence that they are American citizens — They refufe our right of fearc'i, and becaufe we are not inclined to grant their requefts, they de- bar us from their harbours and intcrdi(fl all inter- courfe. One part of the difpute with the unprin- cipled Government of that nation is happily re- moved, the colonies of our en^emies have all been conque»*ed, and it is hoped that oiir fovereign per- eeiving that his generolity has produced nothing but evil, v*4ll return to that jufl and equitable rule on which Lord Chatham adcd, and to vvhich his illaftrious fon, in his laft illnefs, declared that he was determined to revert. Firmly main.taining our maritime righta againft open enemies and fe- cret foes, we may defpife this degenerate govern- ment equally dcftitute of national honour and vir^ tue, and leave them in filent contempt to brood over their felfifh and iniquitous proceedings and to become the execration of future ages.* It is thus that the mod virtuous and generous ^ondud fometimcs produces, in this world, con-* *Sce Notes X. XlTxiI. XIII. : 1 3« -N- fequences partially grievous and which the ftrong* eft fagacity could not have forefeen. That free fyftem of colonization adopted by England fo very different froiji the feyere and rtitridiveform ufcd by other nations inflead of nourifhing grat- itude and afff ^ion, raifed difcontent, enmity and hatred. Our aged monarch from his anxiety to gratify neutrals relaxes his maritime rights. Thi$ ferves no other purpcfe but to encourage de- mands for farther relaxations. The Americans calling themfelves friends, iiveigle our feamen, and .openly prefer the moll paltry interefls to our immediate and their own eventual fafety as a nation. But the delufion is vanifhed, eon^ef-? fions are at ,an end, and the ferpent is difcovered. Such are a few of the leading points of the reign of our graciour fovereign : — To thefe, many others might have been added. The improve- ment of the jurifpri^dence in Scotland — -the great liberality exercife4 towards the French emigrants — the cordial reception given to the harra/Ted and unfouunate Louis XVIII. when all the other jkings of Europe rpfufed him an aiTylu:!^, Is if then any wonder that the profperity of the coun- try hatli increafed iq a rqoft aftoniihing degree under an adminiflration fo paternal : that agricul-^ ture has flourifhed in a manner unexampled in hif- jtory : that commerce has been extended in all its branches, and that the arts and fclenccs have ad- vanced infinitely more in Britain than in any pthcr country in Europe ? Indeed learnlg and the arts have alv/ays experienced the liberal protec- lion of the king. In 1768, he inllitutcd the .39 —re ftrong* at free land fo /e form ,g grat- ity and nety to Thi§ ge de- ericans 'eamen, efts to fety as con^efr vered. of the ;, many iprove- e great igrants fed and other Is if coun-» degree gricul- in hif- 1 all its ve ad- in any ind the protec- ^d the ! feoyal Academy of Painting, under his imnredr- ate care, fubje(^ to the direction of forty artifts of the firft rank in their feveral profefhons. Tliis refledts immortal honour on the tafte and munifi- cence of the '.ing, and proves his eagernefs to promote the progrefs of the arts. He cheerful- ly came forward to promote the cftablilhment of the Royal inftitution in liOndon for tlie purpofc of giving regular ledtures on the fciences : an inftitution which has already done much towards the difFufion and improvement of knowledge and produced a feries of difcoveries only furpaflccl by the difcoveries of Newton, and which, but for this, might have been ftill unknown. Animated by that pure patriotic flame which is the nobleft paifion that can enter the breaft, he is forever feeklng his people's good, a-nd always teaching them,, by his illuftrious example, how to procure it. Though far diftant, we are no lefs the objedls of his paternal care. To us as well as to the inhabitants around him, he is the faithful guardian and difpenfer of all the benefits flowing from the moit perfe(St form of government. Our conftitution, modelled after that of Great Britain,, partakes of all the advantages which an experience ef leveral centuries had accumulated. 1: is not, therefore, the work of a day ; it rcfts upon old and tried foundations, the lore durable, becaufe vifionary en»piricks have not been allowed to touch them. No fine fpun theories of metaphyficians, which promife much and end in mifery, have fhared in if' formation ; fuch men may deftroy» but they can never build* All the privileges ?:1 ■1 4^ which Englifhmen pofiefs are ours. In tins rel- ped:, the Britifh empire is united ; for with a gen- crofity, never before equalled, thefe liberties were extendcdjwithbvil rcferve, to the French inhabitants of Lower Canada. This portion of a once great and gallant nation, were received as fellow fub- jeds ; every mark of fubjedion was carefully re- moved ; their very prejudices have been treated with the greateft refped, and they are left in the full exercife of t^eir religion and of all their civil rights. Yes, Canadians, valuable are the advan- tages which you enjoy as Britifli fubjidds ; your ancient laws refp'eding property have been retain- ed beciaufe you defired it, and the feverity of the criminal code has been removed by the introduc- tion of the milder adtiiiniftration of the law of England; Your very feelings have been confult*- ed with a condefcenfion and delicacy highly pleaf- mg 5 your manniers and cuftoms have been cher- iflied and pro*;eded, your language retained in thd courts of juftice, in parliament and upon all pub- lic occafions. Our gracious fovereign as well as his parliametit, have manifefted no other defire than to extend your liberty atld increafe your hap- pinefs. You have received the power of corred- ing w^hat fhall appear wrong in your laws and Infiitutions, and of framing fuch new regulations as the growing intcreft and proli"werity bf the prov- ince ihall require. Enabled to changCj modify and improve the exifting laws, and pofTcfling all that is beneficial in the Brltiih Conftitution, what may be jultly expeded on your parts in return iot gifts fo precious ? Surely that you will return that i :(- ap- and ions irov- fdify all hat iifot that affection and love foi* our auguft fovereign, which he has manifefted to you. That you will teach your children the value of the benefits which you have received, and infpire them with gratitude and loyalty. Behold, you will fay, the generous treatment which we have experienced from the Britifh. Thrown into their hands by the fortune of War, we fourtd them friends inftead of ene- mies. They relieved us from the numerous op- preffions of our former government, and moft ainxioufly removed all traces cf recent victory.— We w n-e eiirolkd among the number of Britifh iubj.edls,^^nd all the rights, privileges, and im- munities' of that happy people were conferred Upon us. And, my c!/.ldren, living under a king fo generous, fo benevolent and juft, a king whofe greateft joy is to fee his fubjedts happy and free,; what can we wifh for that we do not polTefs : behold comfort, wealth and grandeur flowing in upon us, and our liberty giving our country the riioft folid charms, notwithftanding its freezing, fky and piocraftinated fnows. To the freed man, iabriuj Ipfes its pain ; he may be poor, but he fee* • 'n'iielf independent, and he bows not to the prouti TiiJ the haughty, the rich or the powerful, for they dare not moleft him. Other countries itiay enjoy a warmer climate, and may produce more delicious fruits, but are thefe an equivalent for anarchy, for defpotifm and oppreflion. Cul- t^'-ate then my deareft children, your afFcdion for V.e Britifh king, government and laws, and for your Britifh fellow fubjeds. This afFedion, this loyalty will be better than mines of filver and F '■1: h gold ; it will warm your hearts and inQ)ire )'0U with the nobleft virtues. And let not this facred attachment to our king be cankered with the fpirit of difcontent : fly from thofe who endeav- our to poifon your minds with diftruft of your Brit- ifh brethren with details of grievances which under fo free and generous a government never exifted, and of oppreflions which under fo free and generous a government never durft appear. And let not the fordid paflions of the foul deter you from ftepping forward, in the hour of dan- ger, to defend 3'our country, and to preferve, unimpaired, the ' ious privileges which you have received. Tru... to your fathers who are ready, after fifty years experience of the mildr nefs, the juftice and integrity of the Britilh gov- ernment, to prove their loyalty by the moft pre- cious facrifices, and can you think that this up- right government would change its virtues for leverity and oppreilion ? No ; tde intereft of the people and the government is the fame,. Let us therefore rally round it and facrifice, with alacrity, our wealth, even life itfelf to preferve it pure : that thoufands may enjoy thofe bleflings which it is qualified to beftow, contented if we can contribute to its permanence and be entomb- ed for our exertions in the breafts of a grate- ful pofterity. Such, Canadians, ought to be your exhortations to your children : inculcating, with paternal anxiety, affeftion for your fellow fub- jed:s, proper refignation and obedience to the laws> a due deference and homage for fuperiors, and for thofe ,^ho are publicly entrufted with the 43 adminiftration of the province. To do this i« more peculiarly your duty as partakers in the benefits of a conftitution of government found- ed upon the mofc equitable, rational and excel- lent principles : a conftitution of free and equal laws, fecured on the one hand againft the arbi- trary will of the fovercign, and the liccntiouf- nefs of the people on the other : a conftitution which has become the fruitful fource of heroes, the nourilher of liberty, the promoter of learn- ing, arts and commerce : a conftitution which proted:s and fecures the life and liberty of eve- ry individual, and whofe pure adminiftration has been experienced for fifty years through a king who delights in being the guardian of freemen and the father of his people. To conclude, our gracious fovereign looks to the inhabitants of the Canadas with peculiar pleafurc : He has bound the French part of the population by gifts and privileges which form ties of the moft pleafing and lafting kind, and he well remembers the fac- rifices which many of his fubjeds in Upper- Canada, Nova-Scotia and New-Brunfwick have already made in his defence : He never forgets a kindnefs, and he has liberally rewarded them for the privations to which they have voluntarily fubmitted. So many marks of reciprocal affec- tion infure the permanence of your loyalty ; the fame ardour which you have formerly difplayed, and which, though unfuccefsful, covers you with glory, would ftill infpire you with the equal af fe€tion, and your hopes of fuccefs would be bet' founded. And you jvho are youngi remea /^^ ii ¥ i cer '\« it that as our gracious fovereign is dear to all his iubje^ts, he ouglvt alfo to be dear to you : imitate the loyalty of your parents, and as you are heirs to their poffeflions, be heirs alfo to their virtues. And you who have come into this country vol- xintarily preferring it to your own, you will per* ceive the duty of being true to the oath of alle-* giance which you have taken. You have been recognized asBritifh fubje6ls,you have been adopt* ed into our family and received as children.—* Let then obedience and fubmifiion to the law* mark your conduct, and as you receive proteQion, pur king has a juft claim to your fervice. But in fpeaking to Britiih fubjects, to men con*, fcious of enjoying liberty in its high ell perfedion, it may be fuperfluous to exhort to loyalty. They kiiow that to rife in defence of the king and con- ftitution \ ',■: ••# t I- ! 'f ..III 54 <^, for us without our confcnt. It has been faiJ that the colo- nics would have been content with ;i Umiteii reprefcntatioii in p. iliament. This fcems doubtful. They appear to have aimed at independsnce from the beginning, and it is Hfiore probable that no conccflions, no advantages ofFered them by Great Britain would have availed. Bcfidcs the fit- iiation of the colonies and their mother country was pecu- liar : They were long weak and feeble, always receiving, and giving nothing. Moreover fuppofing fuch a conceflion to have been efFedual, yet it could hardly be expe£ted from thofe violent meafuies which the colonies adopted. Even granting thaV the a£ls of parliament were inexpedient, granting that they were wrong, it was difficult, to repeal them in the face of infurredlion and defiance. As the con- teif has long ceafed, it may be thought nugatory to enter in- to the fubje£l, but let it be rememb'ired that by proving that Great Britain» in impofmg certain duties, was not actua- ted by a fpirit of opprelTion, but only with the dcfire of ren- dering her protedlion more efficacious, and if it appear prob- able that the States had determined to be fatisfied with no conceflions but to become independent ; that they thanked Providence, that they had arrived at growth and Itrength fufficient to refifl: the mother country ^ we fhall be able to repel the infidious attacks made on our country by Ameri- cans. Indeed we might proceed to fhew that the fame in- fubordination which produced the revolution hascaufed fev- cral rebellions fincc, and will finally overturn the prefent government. Great Britain might be milbkcn in her poli- cy, but America cannot prove her guilty of injuftice or op- prcffion, NOTE VII. p. 32. iHE French revolution muft be allowed by thofe who were at firrt: its Friends, to have fo notorioufly failed to produce the beneficial ofFccts which were confidently prom- ifi^d by its authors, while it has been guilty of the moft hor- rid excelfes, an' produced the moil: baneful effedls that one cannot hea;, /ithout indignation, any perfon fpeaking of it as glorious. How comes it then that a very great pro- portion of the Ameiican people Hill regard this fanguinary revolution with exultation, and after it has funk into tho moft alarming dcfpotifiu that the world ever faw, a nation pretending to the greateft freedom behold its progrefs with joy. It is that the Ameiican revolution has as certainljr jf^ ' -r ' V i failed as that of France snd is finking faft into, an aharcKy ^ which will give rife either to a general defpotifm, or to a divifioiv. Proofs are not Wanting to efti'^UOi the truth of this opinion, and a minute illuftraiion of them would be^ doing an effential fervice to mankind. Europeans and thofc who live at a diftance are mifled, and fuppofe that Amer- icans are free becaufc they have a fine conftitution written upon paper. They do not know that this conftitution is li- able to infuperablc objedions, and that it is only by infring- ing them that the government ftands. Inftead of poflefling the happieft government in the world, the United States poffefs one ofthevvorft, for who is ignorant that that un- happy country is fubjed\ to a Virginian oligarchy. For- eigners do not know nntl! it be too late that the oligarchy or governing junta do not hefitate to b^eak thofe parts of the conftitution which are in themfclvcs good, when they happen to ftand in their way. The framers of ♦ ae govern- ment of the ftates feem to ha;e thoug u that liberty vv^as ev- , ery thing, but though this be the moft material, other per- fections muft be united, o»herwife liberty itfelf will be in. danger. When a government poireftes no vigor it cannot perform the duties of its inftitution : when it cannot take fome of its meafures fecrctly accountable indeed after- , wards but not at the moment : the uifFerent parts muft be united : its meafures muft be executed with difr )tch, and its arrangements muft difplay wifdom. Nobody ^ ill be fo bold as to fay that the American governme ' [■'OiTofses any one of tliefe advantages. The framers ot r '\onftitu- tion have been called wife, but this produdliun does not prove it. Let any perfon read Lock's trcatifes on gover,..ucnt, De Lolme on the Britilh coviftitution, Blackftone, Mont^ f- quieu with a few other authors who wrote before the minds of men were agitated with fucccflrve revolutions, and com- pare them with the flimfy productions which have dehiged the world fince the American revolution, and they will be forced to confefs, that in this fubje£t, we feem to go back. The ancient authors appear to have ftudicd the fubjedl ^ with more accuracy, and faw the neceflity of uniting liberty with other eftimable qualities. The friends of true and rational liberty have to contend with anarchifts on the one hand, and the fiaves of defpotifm on the other ; and were it not for the Britifti government which is a pradl-ical proof of the propriety of their reafoning, they muft be over- whelmed. The writer is not however fo blind an admirer ■ I! ■« ) ..nil m pi I f; ; of the Britini conflirulion as not to be aware of fcveral irrt" perfeftioiis, much lefs does he think it proper to identify the minifter tor the time being with the government : He conceives a man may be a firm friend to the conftitution and hoftile to the miniller's meafures, but he thinks tiiis hoftility has limits, and fhould never be fo conduced as to raife murmurs or to transform oppofition into rebellion as it has fomcitimes done (the American war.) Conceiving the Britifh the beft practical form of government that ever exifted, thofe who underitand it beft muft love it beft, and fuch will not hefitate to defend it at the hazard of their lives. In maintaining its purity, they will oppofc any en- croachment tending to arbitrary power on the one hand, or popular authority on the other. Preferving the balance with fteady care, they will admit no changes on either fide without the greateft deliberation, NOTE VIII. p. 32. A COOD hiftory of the American war is yet a defidera* tum and cannot perhaps be written for feme time to come. The following dialogue between an American and an Eng- lifliman, throws fome light upon the fubjeft. Ji, How happens it that I never hear you praifmg the noble ftand for freedom which we made. E. Becaufe I do not think that you have gained any advantage, and I am not fatisfied of the juftlce of your caufe. J. Juftice of our caufe ! can any thing be more clear ? Our property was to be taken from us without our own confent : We refifted fo vile an attempt, and we were vidorious. E. Two wars Ivere undertaken on your account, and the mother country Called upon you for ailiftancc : You murmured, refufed, and left her to pay debts which fhe had contrafted on your account, A. But we had no reprel ntatives. E. Was the demand ever made in an amicable manner ? J. Yes, frequent- ly ; petitions, remonftranccs were often fent,but in vain. E. fiow were thefe expreifed r in language harlh and menacing. Were a perfon to come to you to afk you to do fomething for him, in language rude and harfli, holding a bludgeon behind his back ready to ftrike you on a refufal, would yon grant his requcft ? My fr' id, your countrymen liril mur- mured againft the fupprefl^n of the illicit trade which they carried on with the Spanilh colonies a'.d which gov- ernment found it necelfary to prohibit from good faith pledged in treaties, perhaps it was done in loo harfh a man- 57 ner, but this was not furcly a fufficicnt rcafon for fcpara- tion. After this you were called upon to pay fomething to defray the expences of the war : And the refiltance firit proceeded from thofe colonics which had been favoured with the freeft conlHtution by the crown. They conceived this perHaps to be the eafieit mode of getting quit of their ob- ligation. A. But is there no time when colonics may lay alide their leadiug (Irings and rife up in their place among the nations of the earth ? E. Perhaps there is : When* ever they are fo increafed in numbers and ftrength as to be fufficicnt by themfelves for all the good ends of a political union. Thefe are the fentiments of a great writer. But you were not thus adequate till the French were driven out, and then you (hould have proceeded in a very different man- ner. No general application for a limited reprefentation was ever made by the colonies. And did not Great Brit- ain gradually repeal her obnoxious lawd, and retain at la{t only a fmall pittarwre to fave her honour and maintain her authority. Were you fatisfied with thefe conceflions, did * you receive them with pleafurc and proceed in modeft petitions for the conceding of a right which was certainly doubtful ? No, you rofe in a flame l^ecaufc you did not re- ceive, at once, your whole demand. Britain willing to hu- mour her froward children, retraced her fteps, and only wilh - cd for a cover to give up the rcit ; not that flic was con- vinced of the juftice of your caufe, but fhe was averfe to bring things to extremities. When two parties difagrce about a doubtful point, mutual forbear:;nce is expected : That Britain (hewed this is certain — but which of the colo- nies ihewed it. You fpeak of being reprcfented, the peo- ple of England arc partially reprefcuted, and had your rep- refentatives been prefent in parliament, they could not have prevented the palfage of a fingle ail. The Americans, at that time, did not exceed three millions — the inhabitants of Great Britain were about eleven ; but the proportion of taxes expe«fted would not h»ve been otic nineteenth of the an* nual expenditure. It will eafily be fcen by a clofe infpec- tion of dates that while you were prefcnting petitions to the king, you were preparing vigoroufly not only for defc'i- fivc but offcnfive war, and taking every method to vilify and to oppofe the government from which you rebelled. But what gives me room to think your caufe unjuft, not one of thofe in both houfes of parliament who brought forward meafures of reconciliation, a^imitted the principles for ,,'*. '% ! which yon contended. How couhl they admit that three flioiild didate to eleven millions. The beft plan would have been to have had nothing to do with you and left you to yourfelves : But this could not be expe(Elcd : The paflions were r^ifed on both lides the atlantic, and reafon was not heard ; but no other mode would have anfvvered. I am, in fine, of this opinion concerning the American war — That it was unwife in Great Britain to adopt coercive meafures, but that the greater degree of injuftice refled with the col- onies — That no mode ot reconciliation which could have been offered would have been effedlually permanent ; a fep- aration muft have enfied, for that fpirit of democracy which now proftrates every thing virtuous and honourable in the United States had already rendered them incapable of the moft moderate fubordination. NOTE IX. ^. 'il.-^Ort the Declaration of Independence. Any perfon who has converfed with Americans mud have obferved the veneration in which they hold the declara- tion of independence. This paper is valued more than Diana was by the Ephefians, and becaufe Mr. JefFerfon is fuppofed to have written it, the grateful ^' es have quietly fubmitted to his ruinous policy for eight years : A policy which has placed them in the moft defpicable and ridiculous fituation. This extraordinary fpecimen of gratitude in a people fo much alive to their own interefts, raifed my cu- riofity to read and examine this declaration with greater care than I had ever done before, and not having any par- ticular refpe^t for its fuppofd author, I am willi-ng to hazard very few remarks upon its various contents. — Were I difpofed to be merry, the preamble affords me a very good opportunity. The paper begins with much af- fected folemnity — ** When in the courfe of human events, it becomes neceffary for one people to diirofve the political bands which have conncilcd them with another, and to af- fume among the powers of the earth the fpparate and eciual ftation to which the lavv:> of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent refpe^^ to the opinions of mankind requires that they fhoiild declare the caufes which iinpel them to a reparation," vVhat docs this fagc writer mean by the laws of nature and of nature's God r Are there two di(lini\ codes ? Arc the laws of nature and the laws of the God of Nature dif- ferent ? This is either nonfcnfe or tautology, or fomething ties, IS 59 worfe. Many have cndcavourctlto Hicw that this cxpreflion proved the truth of the arcufation frequently preferred againd the author that he was an athciil ; but as I con- ceive it impoflible for any man that thinks, to be an athe- ift : It is enough to fhew the clauie to be nonfcnfe, and furely fuch a fpecimen in the preamble militates very much againft the high chara£lcr of the paper. The fec- ond paragraph, taken with a few verbal alterations from Hutchifon's moral philofophy allcrts the belief of the fub- fcribers in feveral abftradl truths, and which taken abftracS- 1y, nobody is difpofed to deny. Confequently their folemn introdu greater power over property, more comfort, and more freedom. Now this life, this liberty, this happinefs is in a manner created by fociety, is rendered valuable by the performance of certain duties. To fpeak therefore of liberty and happiriefs as rights previous to the eftablish- mcnt of fociety is abfurd, and to fpeak of them at all, ••♦., .! ;' I ^\ Co m '4:- :■>« withoTU proving that they flow from the performance of duty is exceedingly incorrti^V, and leads to the moll terrible ~ " " ! mav attrihute ifeqi >nccs. To thisAvilful fej iration we may a many excelicn in tht^ late revolutions. The people were always told of their rights — never of their duties. They were locfed from all refl^aint ; tliey thought they miglit fiezc every thing and do nothing. No wonder that a doc- trine of this kind was popular, but its firft propagators who knew its fv)phi[try have had no great caufe to rejoice, for the mob have comrnbnly alVumed the dreadful right (for •what villainous exertion of power has not been called a right) i)f putting them to death. The innovators in pol- itics imitated the empirics in religion, the latter have long taught the do£lrine of unconditional grace, that their followers Ihall be faved without doing any thing. The innovators in politics perceiving how popular this was, immediately offered liberty in its utmoft perfection for nothing. The people had nothing to do but to enjoy.— After this claufc w^hich muil deceive, for few can dctedl its fophiftry, the Declaration proceeds, ** That the hijio- yy of the prefent king of Great Britain is a hifiory of n- pccled injuries and ufurpationsy all havhig in direct ohje/1 the efloblijhment of an ahjohite tyranny over the Jiates — Ta prove this let faBs be fubmittcd to a candid world. Then follow what are deemed the fa6ls, but which are, in truth, only vague affertions. The firft twenty-three aflertions relate chiefly to matters previous to the war, fome of them' inftead of being grievances may he proved to have been highly beneficial to the Itates. Others refer to the cjtertion of fuch prerogatives of the crown as it always pofTefl'ed and ftill poffeflbs. And the remainder admit of fuch an elucidation as would entirely prove the falfchood of the firft aftertion in the declaration th-'t a feparation was neceftary. To enter into a minute examination of each claufe would be too much for a note, but fuch a work would be ufeful : We ftiall content ourfelves with mentioning a few fa£ls which prove the falfehood of the laft quotation. We mentioned, in a former note, the libcralty of Parlia- ment in voting j/|^ 300,000 as a compcnfation to the colonies foon after His Majefty's acceftion. Was this oppreftion r In the peace of 1763, the interefts of the colonies were principally attended to. Was this oppreftion ? In 1764, fome rcfolutions were adopted concerning the 6i American trade ; a year's delay was given to allow them to be canvaflcd. Was this like opprelfion ? The colonial agents were even invited to petition to be heard againit ih« refolutions, but they declined. Oppreifion fhould be made offterner ilnff. In 1767, fome duties were laid upon glafs, tin, paper, and painter's colours, imported from Great Britain into America. This was a mode of taxation admitted by the colonies and their friends ; but concellion had now made them haughty, and they denied even this power in the Brit- ifh parliament. Indeed the alfembly in New York refolved to pay no regard to an ad for providing troops with neceflTa- ries in their quarters, but regul-iled the provifions according to their own fancy. Thefe lad duties having created great commotions, min- ifters engaged to repeal them, and in 1770 they were all rc- -pealed except three-pence per lb. on tea. Was this op- preflion ? In 1770, a tumult happened in Bodon b*ctween the townf- people and the foldiers, in which fome of the former were killed. The foldiers were inftantly delivered up for trial and acquitted by a jury of townf-mcn. Was this opprcf- fion r In 1773. the Boftonljns deftroyed the tea, and this occa- fioned the Borton port bill, a meafure certjiinly provoked by the condu(^ of the people of this town lor fevcral years pre- vious to this, but which was only intended to be temporary. In 1775, it was enaftcd that when any of the colonies fliould propofc according to their abilities to raife their due proportion towards the common defence, fuch proportion to be raifed under the authority of the alfembly of fuch prov- ince and to be difpofable by parliament, and when fuch col- ony (liould alfo engage to provide for the civil government and the adminiflration of jiiftice within fuch province, it fliould be proper if fuch a propofal ftiould be approved of by his M.tjefty in parliament to forbear in rcfpecl to fuch colony to levy any duties Or taxes or to impofe any further duties or taxes except fuch as should be neceifary for the regulation of trade. While the colonics were fending the mod fpecious dec- larations to the Britifh, and petitions to the king and parlia- ment, praying for a repeal of thofe acts which they confid- ered grievous; they were bufy preparing to carry the war into Canada, and they did carry it there amidd their pro- ^t I'! 02 iclTions ot loyalty. "Vlui rcpiiblicnn cant of profcflInG; one tiling and doing another was b«;gnn Uy tlu I'c fu^cs, altliongh they (lid not curry it fo far as the rulers of France. The different l The confequence was that many defertcd and from being our friends became our moft bitter foes. Thoufluids were prevented from joining when they beheld the royal generals rewarding their loyalty with infult. It was eafier to bear the oppreflion of enemies than contempt and poverty wher« they expe6tcd friendfhip and protection. It is but juftrcc to general Burgoyne to fay that in this particular he a»:ted much more honourably than general Howe, but Lord Dor- chefter, then general Carleton, was the moft attentive to llie American loyalifts and always treated them with tlic great- eft benevolence and refpeft. After all we cannot help ad- miring lord North's liberality in this particular, but le? n* ftatefman again reduce it to pradicc. »-'L' » I i ' I m ■ l! 64 NOTE XI. p. 37. • . On the Prof fur ity of Great Britain . Tub rapid incrcafe of the trade and commerce of Great Brituin, fince the American revolution, has been truly afton- ifhing, and fully juflifics the conclufion, that before that pe- riod tne attention of government was too much confined to the colonics. Since t'786» the exports and imports have more than doubled. The internal improvements have proceeded with ftill greater adlivity — roads, canals, docks, public build- ings, increafc of towns, &c. It would be cafy to make this note lung. I might mention that there is in value fix or fev- en hundred millions of infurablc property in Great Britain and Ireland ; that the very houfes are valued at more than two himdred and feventy millions ; the merchant (hipping at twenty-four millions, and the revenue excluiiveof loansat fifty eight millions, &c. — but I forbear entering into details. See an excellent fpeecli on this fubjedl by the Honourable John Richardfon in i8o8> on committing a bill for eilablifh- ing a bank in Lower Canada. NOTE XII. p. 37. On the Caufes of the French Revolution, Th£ dreadful picture drawn by profelTor Robifon in his book of mafonic confpiracies and by the Abbe Barreul of the Vait influence of the philofophids, has always appeared to me greatly exaggerated. The mafs of the people could neither read nor write, and to fuch Voltaire and his aflbci- ates wrote in vain. But though thele people could not read, they could hear, and the foldiers who had ferved in the American War did more on their return than all the philo- fophifts together. Moreover ihe Americans had been pat- ron! fed by the court : the public attention was turned to- wards them I their declarations and motives were examined, read by thofe who could read, and commented upon* It Was popular with the court to defend their caufe and it foon became popular with the nation. The literati never had the power of commanding an attention fo general as this, although they, nodoubt^ made ufe of it when it was prefentid. But fUll the '^".aggerated defcription of the hap- pinefs of America by voundtd foldier, and of the rights and privileges of its '' .c inhabitants would make a much more lively impedion than the moft finlflied harangue. — The American was therefore the chief caufe of the French revolution. Other caufes^ no doubt, concurred. The cor* \ •^-l 1 - \ y -<.»■ •»i^ /3. m < *.■< i-'-i \ ,.. v'% I 'I'll ••"•■•■■■■•"l^-lii mum mmm i '\ !:■ * 1 il '> '■■ M W^' .'« % ■ ,.,;..! V :'-^'.. :^^fi' f,Z M •■ , I l.lf # * -s-W'K •%, •■fc*'l*«*«*(i*9*9S38*(HtllBi3Js»«3I3X5f^'"4_»^ «i fuption of the court ; the oppofition of the parliament \ the mifecable (tatc of th« Hnances j the cofrMptiuo of juiUc^ and of fcUgion. The progrefs of th« Kfench levolution has been mod ex- traordinary. In 17939 the French guillotined their lawful king, Louis XVI. In iSc^, they raifed to the throne Bona- parte. It is worth the while to examine the chara6):ers of thefe two perfons, that we may be able to value the advanr tages of the change. Louis XVI. poifelTed uncommon be- nevolence an4 goodnefs of heart ; ample proofs remain of bis love for his people, and his earned defire to promote their happinefs ; no man ever (hoiie more in domeilic life, or ex- celled in the qualities which adorn a private ftation. His fentiments and directions which he addrelfed to the preceptor of his Ton, refled on his head and heart immortal honour.— Magnify (faid this amiable a¥>narch) in His eyes the virtues which conflitute a good king, and let your lelTons be adapted to his comprehenfion. Alas, he will become one day but too ftrongly tempted to imitate fuch of his ancedors as weredif- tinguiiaed only by their warlike exploits ; military glory dizzies the brain ; and what fpecies of glory is that which rolls its eye over ftreams of human blood, and defolates the univerfe I Teaeh hitA wit'u Fenelon, that pacific princes a*, lone are held by the people in religious remembrance. The iirft duty of a prince is to render his people happy ; if he knows what it is to be a king, he will always know how to defend his people and his crown. Teaqh him early to know how to pardon injuries, forget injuftice and reward laudable a«ad to encounter were too ipuch, and he funk in the con- flict. Yet the French will, one day, recal to remembrance the wrongs they have done him, and they will curfe the bar- barity of the villains who durft imbrue their facrilegious hands in the blood of fo good a prince. The prcfent empe- rour of France, the favourite and ele£t of the people, forms a comiplete contraft to the prince whom they murdered.— Louis XVI. was pui to death for his virtues, and Bonaparte jraifcd to the purple for his crI.Tie.s, This emperor was firii I 'i!;' M i« ,65 a Iteutcrianf of drtiltefy, then one of the fpies of the police i he was made a general for marrying the caft-ofF miftrefs of his patron ; poiionod his fick foldiers in Egypt ; murdered his prifoners ; perjured himfelf in nuinberltfs inftances ; fubverted the conftitution he had fwcrn to maintain ; maiTa- cred Capt> Wright, the Due Enghein, Touffai'nt, Pichcgru, Vilieneuve, and in hne, what dreadful crimes hath not this man committed ? He is the betrayer ef nations, and the fcourge of the human race In one thing he i&.s according to retributive juftice \ he governs the French people with a rod ot iron. Under his lafh of fcorpions, they will learn to •value the peaceful monarch whom they have loft. As a pub- lic charaaer, he poflefles abilities ; but they are the abilities of a demon, always employed in promoting evil. NOTE XIH. p. 37. So much has been written Goncerning the fmpreflmcnt of £riti(h feamen from the (hips of neutrals, by perfons more competent to the task, that 1 (hall content myfelf with mak-^ ing a very few general ubfervations upon this important fub- je£t. When tl is qiieHion is urgued upon the princi'* pies of the laws of nations, the difputants can find no pre- cedents, and therefore each party draws infeiences fromjef- tabli(hed rules, .rhich the other is unwilling to admit. It is therefore no wonder that by this mode of difcufliion the quef- tioD becomes more perplexed and obfcure. What is com- monly terroer) tl.c law of nations is an imperte£t coUe£lio« ofeftabliflitd ' faees, which contemplate a very few particu- lars, and which from their very natDre muft be always mul- tiplying. The mod perfect code of luws fails to comprehend every cafe, clfe there would be no necedity for the enadlment of new regulations every year. Yet if it (hould be thought nece(rary to defend the condu£l of the Britifh upon th/s ground, it might be done with fuccefs. The law of nations exprefsly condemns fending arms or military (lores by way of merchandize to either of the dates at war, as a breach of neutrality, and even common provifionsintoa place bcfieged; how much more detrimental is it to one ot the belligerent powers to be deprived of her fubje£ls, and thofe the very pcrfuris who muft defend her : What is the ufe of (hips ef war without Tailors to man them, and where (hall failors be found if a neutral ftate encourages them to defert. The B lit iih require only their own men. They have uniformly difch.jrged all foreigners when demanded, and (hall they be 67 cleprived of thofe who alone are able to defend them by a na* tion who pretends fricndihip ? But as it c innot be denied that much vexation and inconvenience are fnffered by Amer- ica from the right of fearch exercifed by the Britifli naval of* ficers, and that the pradlice is not fo beneficial to Great Brit- ain herfelf as might befuppofed, fome arrangemunt of an amicable nature might be agreed on, without diiidvantage to cither party. And the United States ougtit to be the more ready to enter into fuch an arrangemtnt, becaufe the quef- an the Britifh merchant cari well afford, the provifions equally good, and the manners and language nearly the fame ; and inuead of any preference be- ing given to natives, the preference will often be given to the Britifli failor from iiis greater experience. The general policy of America feemsto be to detain her own citizens at home, and to navigate her (hips chiefly by foreigners. Thi$ policy however proceeds not from any fuperiour wifdom in her government, but from her fituation. The melancholy wars which have agitated Europe, have increafed her trade in a mofl aftonifliing degree ; and although the natural in- creafe of her population has been prodigious, it was next to impoffible for her to meet the Remands of her increafing trade by an adequate fupply or native Teamen. Now aj} great numbers of Britifli failors have been employed in the ships of the United States during the laft and the preTent war, after they had been publicly recalled for the dcfehce of their native country ; it would have Turely been proper for the .^erican governoient, yrhen it propofed to Great Britain, tc» .' r ill ..|: 68 '^5 ■''■■..-v.: y. K reHnquilh the right of fearch, to accompany this novel prop- olition with fuch aTrangcments as would make >»-' no loicr by its fufpenfion or relinquishment. That American mer- chant vcir'ils should be an afylum for British failors at all times, even when their own country is in the utmoft danger ftnd no nr.eans of redrefs offered, is a demand in itfelf foex- ',*eedingly unjuft, and carries in its appearance fo much of ^oftility and perverfenefs, as cannot fail to ftrike moil forci- bly every.perfon of discernment. The language of America •to Great Britain ought to have been very cotRiliating upon t^ \ fubjeft, The difTiculty of always diltinguishing indi- viduals should have be«'f) frankly acknowledged, and the THoft folemn afliiranccs (liouKl have been given that every "Bi'itifh feaman would be promptly given up on application to the neccflary authority, and that laws for this purpofe Ihould 1)e exprefsly enabled. An arrangement on thi'i fubjefl is at- tended, I am fenfible, with great difficulty ; but had it been imdertaken in the fpirit of amity, it might have been adjufted in a manner agretable to both nations. And furely America •ought to have been very delicate in requiring a favourable decifion of a queilion tnatcan hardly arife between any two •nations except the Britiih and their children. Yet fo little 'has this contefted point beendifcuiled in the fpirit of liberaU ity, that the American government demands it as a right that Britifh failors (hall not be taken from their private ihips, and they aflfert that it is their due from the eftabli shed laws of nations. To found a claim upon laws in which it Was never. contemplated, and which are completely againft it in as far as they can be applied, is not very judicious and convincing, and herefore on this ground Great Britain ver.y properly refufes itsadmiflion. After all, I do not think this queftion a fufficient caufc of hoftility ; it is not yef too late to enter into an amicable ar- rangement ; and as it ran only be a matter of difputc in time of war, this should render the negociators the more dif- pofed to come to a fettlement. I am aware that partial in- terefts enter too much into modern politics, and that in mak- ing treaties exclufive commercial advantages are more fought «fter than the folid benefits which refult from a more liberal policy. But if there ever was a time for tvi^o nations inti- , mately connected with each other, to lay afide their jealouf- ies, it is now, when a tyrant has appeared with immenfe power, who is eflentially the enemy of both. Thofe who arc acquainted with the proftitutiun of American protections, ^m-' inn- alouf- menfe who Uons, and how cheaply ihey may he obtained, will fee with roe the neceflity of new regulations in this particular, as the begin- ning of an amicable arrangement, tor it has lo»ig been noto- rious that thefe protections are procured in the moll nefari- ous manner. Not that the general government of the Uni- ted' States can always be blamed for the improper condud of its officers ; but certainly it behoves that government to rem- edy the evil by a ftritElcr enquiry into the pretenfions of thofc who demand protedlion, and never to grant them without the rlearcfl proof that the claimants are native Americans. — It this were done as a previous ftep to all arrangements on the fiibjeCl of fearch, it would evince a dtfire on the fide of the American government to meet the British halfway, and that they bad no wish to detain our fcamen, but only to ef- cape the vexation of a fearch. After taking this preliminary ftep, they might adopt other regulations, which by fecuring licr mariners to Great Britain, might induce her to concede the point in difjMiie. This might be done, ill. By a navigation a£l ; 2. By fubjedling thofe who employ British feamen to a heavy penalty, when Great Britain is at war ; 3. By readily giving up I'uch feamen as shall ftill be difcovered, on proper evidence being given that they arc British fubje£ls. '- If a general navigation a6l should be thought difadvanta- geous to fuch a new country as the United States, as might be cafily proved, the other modes ftriflly executed would be fufficient \ and what prevents thefe and fimilar or better reg- ulations from being adopted, but want of cordiality in the adminiftration of the United States? Thofe who have read -'Mr. Munroe's able defence of himfelf for figning the treaty with Great Britain, will find that an informal arrangement rcfpeCling the impreilment of feamen, was at the fanio time concluded, although there was no article refpe6ling it in the treaty itfelf ; how the American government rejtftcd that ar- rangement is not eafy to explain — certainly the Britisa min- iftry made a very liheril concefiion. I am afraid that a want of fincerity will bfc difcovered on the part of th:: American government in regard to that treaty, of which neither theirown ambaffadours nor the British minillry were aware. Tiii-y feem to have had no dcfire to fettle any thing finally, but to remain on. the watch, ready to ^ixtort concefTjons from Great Britain at every favourable moment ; tiiat is, when she ap- peared unfuccefsful, or hard prcflcd in the conteft in which 76 Kh«i i§ engaged. This is a short- figh ted policy, and is fure to engender hatred inftead of friendship. No treaty can be folid uiilefs both parties are cnually pleafed with the ftipu- lations. Wken one takes ajvantase of another to extort conditions, thefe conditions will be violated as foon as oppor- tunity fervcs. The page of hiftory exhibits no caufe of war fo abfurd, as that whicn is likely to produce a rupture he~ tween American and Great Britain. Nations commonly quarrel on account of injuries done to their own fubiedls, and not for the prote£lion of deferters, or to fay the be(f, dcfpicable wretches, who have the mean- nefs to leave their country in a crifis of extraordinary peril. Let the American psople only confider the matter fcrionfil; ; fuppofe they have ten thoufand British fcamen in their em- ploy, the detention of whom produces a war — is it not evi- dent that in a few months a zreater number than this of their own citizens may fall in the conteft ? Setting afide then the havoc that will be made of their towns, the vaft expenfes that they will incur, the lofs of lives will be infinitely more >. diftrefling, than all the advantage they can poflibly deriv<; from detaining the mariners of their enemy. Add to this, that British feamen would be dangerous to them in cafe of war. Few men can fo far divert themfelves of their am»r patria as not to have fome leaning towards the place of their birth, where their friends and thofe they love lUll remain ; they might therefore do their protcdlors ferious injury at the moft critical moment. How much better to give up thefe feamen— will it be faid by the Americans, we care lit- tle for the men, but we muft refift the fearch : it may be anfwered, that the fearch would be very rare, were it cer- tain that no British feamen could be found, ^luch may be loft and nothing gained by detainirig thefe feamen ; and the more the fubjeft is confidered, the more shall we be convin^ cedof the propriety of a liberal and fpeedy arrangement.-— The abfencc of foreigners would make no fenfible diminution in the extent of American commerce, and the fource of con- tention between Great Britain and the United States would be laid alleep. NOTE XIV. p. 36. I HA VI been frequently annoyed by an obfcrvatlon, which feems to gain ground with perfons of fenfe and dif- cernmcnt, but which I conceive to be totally without found- ation, that till Great Britain f^ll, America Is fecure. \n iiith< efted which fcene mer ^nd It oppre fure n be :ipu- jctort )por- : war e bc- done rtersy nean- periJ. wiij i ir cm- )t evi- f their e then penfes more detivQ to thisy cafe of r am9r )f their main ; ury at ive up are lit- nay be it cer- may be and the onvin-' ent.-— inution |of con- wquM vatlon, nd dif- found- re. In this aflcrtion it is taken for granted, that the indepcnJendc of the United States wiH furvive that of Great Britain^ Kow I am of a very difFcfent opinion, for I think it may be eafily proved, that the liberty of our mother country is plac- ed on a much firmer bafis than that of the American States, and that a continuation of the fame ruinous policy adopted by Mr. JefFerfon, will in four years more deftroy their con- ftitution. I begin with aiTerting that Great Britain is in no danger from the prefent war ; the time of invading her with any profpeft of fuccefs is part. Every perfon knows, that the inhabitants of the British empire are foldiers to a man ; that the regular army is numerous and well difci- ftlined, and what is an hoft in itfelf, the nation is convinced of the necciTity of the war. Had the French effeded a land- ing before the volunteer fyftem attained its perfection, they might have done much mifchief ; but even then they mufl have failed in their obje£l— Buonaparte would not find it fuch an eafy matter to bribe men ot influence in England, as he has done on the continent of Europe. The British no- bility, certainly the moft deferving in the world, have not yet teamed to barter their honour for gold ; nor does the army and navy contain a fingle officer capable ofdeferting the caufe which he has fworn to defend. In comparing Great Britain with France, people are apt to be ftruck with the great conquefts of the latter, and her numerous arnies ; they look at her trampling upon the liberties of all Europe, and they tremble for England >vithout a friend ; but they should remember that if France be ftrong on land. Great Britain is equally fo at fea ; and that her navy is more likely to maintain its fuperiority than the armies of her enemy. The more that Buonaparte extends his dominions, the weaker he becomes, unlefs we are to fuppofe that the nations he de- prives of their independence, and ruins by hi& exactions, be- come more attached to his perfon and government. It h contrary to rational logic to infer, that becaufe the French have overrun the neighbouring nations, tney will be able to keep them long in fubje6lion. Their fuCcefs has been owing hitherto more to their policy than their power, to the inter- efted views and irrefolute conduA of the governments over ■which they have triumphed ; but more efpecially to that fcene of corruption and treachery, never equalled in any for- mer age, which made their conquefts in Germany, PruHia ^nd Italy very eafy, Thcfe things will change ; repeated opprelfions will rou-fe meri of f}.urit and virtue to vindicate 11 ihe caufe of their country. How much ihefc may efFc»^ ap« pears from the example of the inhabitants of Soain. How infignifrcant the French would be, had the people a few men of condu6l and abilliics to diredl their juft indignation.-* Such men will appear ; the prcfcnt torpour that pervades tha conquered nations will not alvvays continue. The French empire therefore, in appearance (Irong, is in reality weak ; the prefent ruler may, by his fingular talents, hold the dif- cordant parts a little longer togetiier ; he may be able to prcferve it during his life, becaufe he has no rcg^ard to any right human or divine, when tlicy fecm to (land in the way of his views ; but at his death the whole fabric will crumble. On the other hand, Great Britain depends not on the life of any individual ; her power is deep rooted, and has been growing for feveral centuries. With a conftitution well de « fined, and fubjcdls willing to obey, (he governs entirely by the laws, unacquainted with the violence pradifed by her adverfary. She calls upon her people to arm, not to gratify her ambition, or a foolish pallion for empty glory, but to pro- tedf the dearell rights that men can enjoy ; to fecurc their freedom and independence. We ire indeed told by many well meaning perfons, that she i i fall becaufe her power depends 'jpon commerce ; and to confirm this pofition they eite all tiie commercial nations of antiquity. It would lead me too far from my prefent purpofe to enter minutely into the queftion, whether a nation be more independent that refts upon commerce or upon agriculture, though the refult of fuch a difcullion, " hen carefully made, would end much more in favour of commerce than is apprehended ; but in fpeakingof Great Britain, it is not necclfary to examine this cjueftion, bt caufe she is not a commercial nation in the fame fenfe with. the (tatcs of Holland in modern time, or Tyre and Carthage in ancient. Her commerce refts upon an ag- ricultural bafis ; she unites the advantages of both ; her lands arc the bei> cultivated in Europe, and fhe carries on the moft extenfive trade. In her hands commerce and agricul- ture mutually aftift one anotjicr ^ they contribute all their advantages and few of their evils. If the enemy therefore Ihould fucceed in curtailing her commerce, (he is not van- quished, and he weakens himfelt in the attempt much more than he does her. I might proceed to mention feveral other advantages which Gieat Britain poflelfes over her adverfary, and the many difficulties which a new and oppreffivc govern- ment like that of France has to encounter i but I proceed 73 \ovf men n.— • stha cnch rak i dif- le to ) any i way mble. life of s been ell cle - :ly by )y her gratify to pro- ; their many power pn they lid lead ly into nt that refult much but in ne this e fame r Tyre an ng- Ih i her on the gricul- 11 their crefore »ot van- ;h more ral other Ivcrfary, govern- proceed to shew that America is in much greater danger than Great Britain. It was neceflary to prove that Great Britain ftood at Icaft: on as firm ground as France previous to our illuitration of the danger of America. The danger of America, though uniform in its nature, will be more immediately connc6ted with the flute of things in Europe. ift. It may arife from the continuance of the pfff nr war. 2. From a peace takingplace among the belligerent powers; 3. From a new fyflem of things arifing on the continent, of which there is a great probability. 4. From the humiliation of England, which God avert. It ought to be premifed, that I argue upon the prefump- tion that the fame fyflem will be continued in America "which has dire£ted her government for thefe eight years part, 1 fhall not fpeak at prcfent of the weaknefs of t'.ie general government, theiarring intereftsof the different flates, nor the two fa£lions m which the inhabitants appear to be divi> ded. But I do not omit them as unimportant, on the con- trary they will increafe the danger of the country and accel- erate its ilTuc. The pofition ot America in refpedl to the powers at war is at prefent mofl perplexing — they are nei- ther the friends of France nor of England and juflly fufpedl- cd by both. As the French have domineered over the con- tinent of Europe, and deprived the Britilh of many commer- cial advantages, the latter will look around for new friends in more happy climates, to replace thofe they have lofl. It would have been natural for them to have looked to the U- nited States, inhabited by their children, but there they have been repulfed ; they find among them the fame oppofition that they have met with in Europe, with lefs fairnefs ; in- deed they are deprived of their leamen, the very llncws of War, by forged prote£lions and bafe coUuflons, and their (laple articles of trade refufed admittance with more feverity than they are from the ports of open enemies. It is not therefore in the States that they mufl open new fources of trade> They find nothing but enmity, where they might have expe£ted friendihip. ' The confequence of this is evi- dent. Great Britain will find it her interefl to nourifh rivals in trade to the States ; for this purpofe fhe will cheriOi the tovernment of the Brazils by every method she can dcvife. he willafTifl the. States of Spanish America to throw off their allegiance to their mother country, fhould it be con- ^, . M''; r^. % 74 WKtmnti qucrcd. Thefc immenro countries wrll leave her little iff regret for the lofs of the trade to the United State , and all this may be accomplifhcd in a Very short ti-me, even before the repeal of the intcrdiding laws, if they be continued till the caufes which arc faid to have given rife to theih arc done away. Great Britain will alfo, in all probability, acknow. ledge the independence of St. Elomingo, and fopply hcrfelf "Vvith the cotton from that island and the Brazils, which she "Was wont to take trom the fouthern States. Moreover the policy of America docs more to ruin her trade than France and England together : it will be found that the repeal of her rc(tridive laws will not renew her trade to the fame ex- tent. The British Planters difcovering, by fad experience^ ^ the ruinous confcqucnce of depending upon America for prow vifions, will in future fet apart more ground to raffc them, and the American merchant will in vain offer his flour and jpork for fale, after tlie inhabitants of the islands have learn« cd to do without them, or to be fatished with what they can procure from the Batish provinces, Brazil, and the Span* Ish main. The confequericc of thefe checks upon trade will exafpc- rate the people of the United States againft their rules, for reducing fiem by t' eir erroneous meafures into fuch a di- lemma, when the remedy is not to be procured. The coun- try willbe filled with difcontentidifcontent breeds fadion, and the realm will dwindle into feperate governments, which ■will be the more bitter enemies that they wereotice friends. II. Should a peace take place among the belligerent pow-t * erSf the danger of America will incrcafc. Ii is evident that during the ftruggles that have agitated the old continent, thia infant nation has paid no regard to any thing but its own Intereft ; its policy has ever been to derive advantage fromi \he quarrels of Europe, without mudh regard to juitlce or tionour. That fuch has been the cafe even In regard to France, appears from the St. Domingo trade, fo long per-^ lifted in after the rebellion of that Idand againft the mother country. But although individuals rtiay have given caufe of offence to France, we muft confefs that the administra^ tion has been fufticiently compliant. The Mandates of Bonaparte have been obeyed implicitly by the prefent rulers ef America ; they have indeed found it neceflary to qualify and foften their mode of expreflion, but the Spirit has ftill teen retained. It always happens, however, that when a na'- tion lofes fight of its independence and ceases to at^ on equal i-i- ittlc t^ and all before lied till re done :know- hcrfclf ich she ver the France peal of me CJE-. irience^ for pro J : thenn, our and e learn* ley can e Span* exafpc- iks, for h a di- |e coun- ion,and which 'riends, nt pow-» ont that ntinent, its own ge from it ice or gard to ng per-- mother caufe inistra^ dates of rt rulers qualify has ftill en a na- n _75 ■ ; ' terms, when It appears afraid to infii'l upon its jiift rights, and cliufes rather to give up thofe that appear tridiiig than to contend, it is foon ladc to yield all its rights, or fight af- ter its fpirlt is debafcd. This happened with America — the more she yields, the more is demanded. Does she concede one point Jo France, another kept in refervt is immediately brought forward. The conqucrour of Europe will quarrel with America, bccaufu she will not go all the length that ho wishes her. She has trampled upon her own constitution, in order to pleafe him ; but becaufo she has not declared war againfl Great Britain, a mcafurc which her ruler durft not hazard, this defpot is offended and iufults, her en- voy. To be kicked and buffeted about even to give him money for lands of an indefinite or purpofcly of an ambigu- ous extent, or to give him money without even a shadow of an equivalent, were rifks which the prelbnt administration were prepared to go, and which they ha?c afl'umed— but this is not enough. Buonaparte demands them to declare war againfl England ; ihev hefitate, he confiscates their goods ; the non importation law, the Embargo jtfclf is not enough, they mufl declare openly ; they mufl obey his fiat without a murmur or qualification, and as they have not done this, deflruftion awaits them. That France would willingly contribute to the downfall of America, cannot admit of any doubt ; it would be even good policy in her to erteck this growing republic, to prevent a navy from being formed, or a more vigorous general government : it vvould be good po- licy in her to aflilt in difmembering ftates which, united, might check her conquefts and give valuable aid to her ene- mies. But as each ot the particulars from which the dan- ger of America arifes, would fupply ipaterials for a long note, I muil be short. What motives can Great Britain have for treating A- merica with more lenity than France ? to the latter she has been compliant without acquiring her friendship, to the for- mer she has been a fnake in the grafs j ever complaining, never fuisficd. J n (lead of adopting a fincere fpirit of conciliation, she has beei> at all times taking advantage pf her diftreffes, to make new demands ; she has refufed redrefs for an infult, though offered on the faireft grounds ; she has shut her ports to British manufaftures ; she has endavoured to flarve her remaining colonies, and she has in demanding an alteration of the maritime law, virtual- ly joined herfelf ■ with the enemies of the British empi#e. .^^ h >■■ 76 IIP' S^e has even gone th*; length of rejedJng a tr aty, ad- vantagcouik to herfelf, that she might be ready to catch at every advantage, and to come in for a share of the fpoil ^^ on her iu bj;igation. Great Britain, after fuch a long train ot hoftile meafures, cannot have any ftrong motives to guarantee her independence. She can have no reafons fn.'ficiently cogent as to rifk a renewal of the war with France, should the defj^^ot wish to chaftife America ; on the contrary it will be ai much the intereft of Britain as of France, to difmeniber the government; becaufe this will render it impollible, in any future war, for a general embargo or non importation law to be ena(^ed. More- over Great Britain will have other refources and her Weft India iflands will no longer depend upon fupplies from the United States. A peace between France and England, alter America had put an end to all friendly relations with the latter, would therefore be the prelude of her deftruc- tion. She would have nothing to depend upon but the moderation and juftice of Buonaparte, virtues of which his conquells of Switzerland and Spain are terrible examples. III. From a new fyftem of things arifingon the continent. Any change on the continent of Europe muft now be for the advantage tf Great Britain, and that fome very important ch; nr^^smuft foon happen, is I think demonftrable. In that caf (jreat Britain will finish her European conteft with hon- our, or it will require lefs vigilance. She will therefore have more leifure to attend to her relations with Anerica, ^nd difcovering that she has been infulted, she may think it requifite to revenge her injuries ; nor will she be prevented \)y any European ftate — Spain is irritated againft the United States, France is jealous of their growing power. And let - no one fuppofe that becaufe Great Britain was unfuccefsful in the revolutionary war, that she muft ftill be (o. Her plans would be very different, ftie would never ieek for v.vii- queft ; she would ruin American commerce, ara prevent even a fishing-boa^ from plying along the coaft. In fine, it would appear that America had made herfelf many enomie^ but »io friends, many who defire to fee her humbled> and who look upon her profperity with ai.^ evil eye. ' V NOTE XV. p. 36. 'On the jlm^rican Government. ' The people art always in a ferment about elc<3:ions ; they have reprefefttativej?, hni the period for which thev ^tv eie^- cc ih ra crj ro(*kf With Jiis (haipe iteele, :ind ran at him amaine With open mouth, tliat leemcd to containe A full good pecke within the utmoll brim, V ' All fct with yion teeth in raengcs tw.iine, That tcrrifide his foes, and armed hir.-i I; Appealing like the mouth of Orcus gri«fly c^rim. . • And therein were a thouiand tongues empight Of fundry kindes and fundry quality ; Some were of dogs, that harkca day and rught, .ij ' And fome of cats, that wrawling Hill did ciy, ;" And (bme of bcares, that grr yn d continually, ^nd (bme of tygrcs, diat did feen-.e to gven. And fhar at all that ever pafled iiy ; P"t moft of them were tongues of morial men, , iiich fpakc reproachfuJIy, not caring 'vhere nor whe«. And them amongft were mi.iglc^d here and there The tongues of ferpents widi ihree-forked flings. That fpat out poyfon and gore, bloody gore, -, At all tliat came within his ravenings, And I'pake licentious words ai^d hatefull things Of ^ood and bad alike, of low and hie ; Ne kefars fpared he a whit nor kiugs. But eidier blotted them with infamee. Or bit them \yith his baneful! teedi of iniitry. • , . ' ^pen. Fairy ^^ucerty bonk ^fXBitto si. ft' 1 This beaft will obey his keeper who pleafcs him wjth fops and flrokes his back and fight, rob, murder, burn and (leal in his caufe. That there are many good hiws and rcg- uUtions in the IJjiited States will not be denitd, but of what •ufe are laws if not properly admjinilterecjl ? To the men who rule the ftates at pfefcnt, the following paiFage from lylr. Fox's hiftory may be very properly applied. ** The reign of Charles the Second forms pne of the mod '* fingular, as well as of the moft important periods of hiftp. ** ry. It is the era of good laws and bad goverument. The ** abolition of the court of waids, the repeal of the writ de ** herctico comburendo, the triennial parliament bill, the ef- <* tablishment of the rights of the houfe of commons in re- '* gard to impeachment, the expiration of the licenfe a£t, <* and above all, the glorious ftatute of habeas corpus, have ** therefore induced a modern writer of great eminence to fix ** the year 1679 as the period at which our conftitution had *' arrived at itsgreateft theoretical perfedion, but he owns •* in a short note on the pallage alluded to, that the times im- ** mediately following, were times of great practical oppref- ** fion. What a field for meditation does this short obfcrva- ** tion from fuch a man, furnish ! What rcfle*Slions does it, •* not fuggefl to a thinking mind, upon the inefRcacy of hu- ** man laws and the imperfection of human conftitutions ! ** We are called from the contemplation of the progrefs of ** our conftitution, and our attention is fixed with the moft ** minute accuracy to a particular point, when it is faid to ** have rifen to its utmoft perfe£lion. Here we are then at ** the bcft moment of the beft conftitution that human wif- ** dom ever framed. What follows ? A time of opprefllon *' and mifery, not arifing from external caufes, fu<:h as w?*-, ** peftilence or famine, nor even from any fuch alteration of ** the laws as might be fuppofed to impair this boa lied per- ** fe£tion, but from a corrupt and wicked adminiltration, '* which all the fo much admired check? of our conftitution *^ were not able to prevent. How vain then, how idle, how " preii.rnptiious is the opinion that lawscan do every thing | '* and huw weak and pernicious the maxim founded upon it^ *' that rciafurss, not men, are to be attended to." NOTE XVI. p. 36. -' O/,' Baring's pamphlet and neutral right i, Tkose who have written againitthe navigation Jaws, and arg'iect' for tfeeir rcUxatioii, proceed upon the principle qi ^--. ipon It, 11 fcoW calculation, and give nothing to national honour or de- fence. If trade be every thing, and national honour noth- ing, then their arguments may be admitted. But thefe re- laxations are always fure of protra£ling the War, and are the continual caule of embarrafTments. The pamphlet publish- fcd by Mr. Baring has obtained a degree of celebrity which i have no power to diminish, but the imprelfion that the perufal of it left upon my mind, was the fame a$ that which ive feel in reading that the Dutch fuppMcd Louis XIV. with tnilitary and naval ftores^ becaufe the prices he paid yielded^ enormous profits, although they were employed in conquer- ing and enflaving their country. In regard to the orders iiv council, 1 had doubts as to their expediency, but thefe doubts are shewn tc have been ill founded by the recent accounts from the enemy j indeed men of all political parlies now ddmit, that they have effected the end propofed. In con- demning the orders in council, Mr. Baring takes a much wi- der field, and deprecates, with great feverity, our policy to- wards the ftates, which he fays has originated in partial views, IS grofsly unjuft, arid highly detrimental to ourfclves. In proving thefe different pofitions, he begins with endeav- ouring to Weak^^n the llatemcuts of the patriotic authOur of War in Difguife, and brings forward feveral reafons and fa<5ls toprove that the commerce of America with the colonies of the enemy isconduded bona fide. That a writer pretending to difcufs a fubje«^ which few have an opportunity of under- fianding, or of calling in queftioii the fa£ls which he brings forward, should fometimes exaggerate and draw ftronger in- ferences from his reafons than they feem to admit, may fre-^ quently be expelled in political difputes, more efpecially when the authour is interefted in the difcuffion. But that any perfon should make fuchabroadafrertion,as that the com- merce of America with the colonics of t'le enemy is conduct- ed bona fide, requires a degree of boldricfs which few poillfs. The Americans exclaim, and Mr. Baring very generouiTy exclaims with them. What right have you to interrupt our trade with the colonies of your enemies. We are at peace with Spain, France and Holland, and P'rely we have the fame right to trade with their colonies as with themfelve^, and to convey the produce of thefe colonies to any markei that wc pleafe. Is it necelTary for us, becaufe thefe nation^ are enemies to the British, that we should alfo break up our friendship with them ? Have they not as much power to reg- ulate our communication with their colonies as with anjr of 8o t^eir OT\rn ports ? And if \vc obferve tlie llipubtions agreed upon, it becomes i lawful trade, and is the greatelt injuilict; and tyranny in the BiitKh to (top it. The friend of Great Britain d(»es not find much difficuUy In overturning thi> rtafoning. You have a right to trade as neutralsj he would fay, with our enemy toas great an extent as before the war, and to tliat extent we never diffurb you. But your trade with the colonies of the enemy is not of that defcription. It is not a mark of his friendfhip, but of our power. Were it not for our navy, you never would have obtained it, and the enemy makes ufe of you to efcape front us. By your interference, tlie proceeds of the colonies be- come an efFe6live branch of his forces. This w^e cannot fufFer. His admitting you to trade with his colonies in time of war to a much greater extent than in time of peace, is le- gal bf'twecn you and him, but between us and you it is a grofs Fraud, and out of this fraud no right can poflibiy flow. It is notorious that our enemies never open their colonies till they can no longer prote£l them, or keep a regular commu- nication with them ; to tra^e, therefore, fo as to fupply the enemy, is a fraud, bccaufe it weakens and dcitroys our belli- gerent rights* I allow all that ever was allowed till the enemy had nothing left to allow or refufe. You may fup- ply your heme confimiption by your direct tiade with thofe colonies ; you may trade with fuch as were open to you be- rnre the war : I reftrid, I abridge no legitimate right of A.'n erica n commerce. This reafoning I hold to be unanfwerable In point of juf* tice. All the means which Great Britain has to attack and fubdue her antagonift, and finally to prefcribe peace fafe and honourable, are all naval means. She has therefore a right, the facrcd right of fclf-pi-efervalion, to ufe them in time of war as t^ir as may be neccffary : for furcly (he has a better right to exirt than neutrals have to trade. The fairnefs of the rule of 1756 is allowed by Mr. Baring in the following paif age : ' ';'" * " It we had maintained and defended this do6lrine boldly ** and t lirly agairjft all nations, good arguments in favour ot '* it could not at leaft be wantiui^ : but when we have -imi- '^ forii iy relaxed it, and indeed forborne to claim it, can it '" be t;Mii!lJtoul either with magnanimity or good policy, to bring ii turward row, merely bccaufe the only remaining neutr.:! has a defencelefs commerce r If fuch cowardly in- juflico i^ to be ory of our refc>*irces in thefc trying tliues^ »( 'W^" recJi aicc :uHy ie as aent you. [that f our have front js be- annot I time is le- L grofs es till mmu- ly the belli- iU the y fup-^ thofe ou be- ht of of juf* k and e and right, imeof better ■lefs ot owing boldly lour ol Ami- lean it Icy, to laining Illy in- Itiiues^ *< when elevation of fentiment and of national charader is. . •* more than ever wanted, the means and Ilrength of this ** powerful empire are indeed ilrangely niifunderftood." The candid admiflion in the beginning of this paflage is a kind of fweetning to the leverity of the conclufion. Here Mr. Baring admits that good arguments in favour of the rule of 1756 could not be wanting, but he foon after condemns this rule with the name of cowardly injuftice. As foon as We attempt its application what inconfiftency ! But if the rule was ever juft in principle, no condudl of ours could alter this juftice, and although the uncommon prelTure of particu- lar leafons might force us to acquiefce in the injuftice of oth- er nations, it is furcly not inconfiftent with virtue to repel this injuftice as foon as it is in our power. The reaibn ■which tins writer alleges; for our bringing it forward merely becaufe the only remaining neutral has a defencelefs com^ ixierce, might well excufe fome indignation in reply ; but from this we fhall abftain. The partial relaxations of this rule were n^ver willingly admitted ; and the fituation of the world is now very different from what it was in any former war. Before the war which ended in 1763, Great Britain was not poiTefted of the indifputable fovereignty of the feas, while there was a fort of equilibrium, ftie had it not in her power to enforce the principles of maritime law, however juft. So long as France was able to take Britifti colonies, or to ob- ftrudf Britifh trade, or protect and convoy her own, fhe was not obliged to fell the produce of her colonies to neutrals to fo great an extent as fhe has been under the neceifuy of do- ing ever fince 179^. To France the aftiftance of neutrals is neceflary, for without thefe ftie could druvv no aid from her colonies ; befides, the prefent fituation of affairs arifes in a great meafure out of the independence of America, for thii rule here tomplained of was enforced againft the Dutch and other neutral nations before that event. While the United States were the colonies of Great Britain, and during their re olution, France had fleets to protect her own colonies, andvfhe had merchant fhips to tranfport their rich products to Europe ; but fince the independence of America circuni- fiances have changed. France has not even a {loop or fchoon- er tniployed m her colonial commerce ; llie is reduced to ab- fol' :e nullity by ^^^ Britifh navy, as to all the refourcei; which the once Ur^vr from her colonies. And is this tri- umph of the Britiih navy to h* marred by the interference ot neutrab : '•"'ill any perfon fay tnat this fervice is not an f m m fmnortant6ne,that the Britilh navy, by diHrrfling, humbling anaenfccbling her enemy docs notl.ing ^ that by putting a flop to all intercourfti between the enemy und his colonies, which may prove perhaps uliimatcly dccil'ive of the war, by its in- fluence on the comparative force of the two nations, is of no avail ; that it hurls Great Britain herfclf, and that Ihe ought to allow thtir communication to be rdtortd. When the matter is flatcd in this way, its abfurdity fully appears ; cv- ry pound received by Frunce from her colonics, would be employed againll Great Britain. Nor are we to forget that the Britilh colonics thrive efllntially by the exclufion of their rivals from the European markets, and the Britifh commerce is even augmented by the circuitous and expenfive fupplies which France ultimately receives. Having thus feen the advantage refulting to Great Britain from the pra£life of this principle, let us revcrfe the matter, and fuppofe with Mr. Baring, that file ought to extinguiQi the rule. What fol- lows ? Firlt, let us afk of what ufe or efficacy is her navy in the profecution of the war, fo far as the colonies of her ene- mies are concerned ? America now independent, full of en- terprifc and capital, with more than a million tons of (hip- ping, can buy in the illand , flore in the United States, and tranfport to neutral ports in Europe, convenient for the fup- ply of France hcrfclf, every hogfhcad of fugar and every bag of coffee th:>t can be furniflied by the plantations, on fuch terms that the French colonies fliail not feel the war. They shall not be annoyed by the British naval arms, but shall even jflouris'i the more by their fuperiority, depending folely on neutrals ; ibey shall lofe noticing by captures, becaufe hav- ing fold thtir produce, they rid; nothing \ while British pro- duce is liable to capture, and if not captured to high war premiums. The French colonift would ultimately, if not iiiimcdiately, command a price for his crops the more ad- vantageous by roafon of the cheap and faic navigation of the American velfels ; he v^ tnild profj ' - in full peace, while the Briti; h colonift would fe'l the cfFtcts of war on his prof- its. H's only market ould be England, bcaufe he would be underfcH on tf^e con'incnt. The fean\en witl.drawn trom the Fj' rich colonial Cr, imercc would 1k\ as In fa6l they arc, on board ilK-ir roen oi war nt of tt^e famous rcfolutions propofed tocongrcfsin 179:!-, by Mr. Madifon, Jlmounting, in efFed, to a difcoatinuance of commerce between Great Britain and t^e dates, in which he was aflilted by Mr. JefFerfon ; and has he never {"vqu Mr. Madifon's pamphlet on the maritime rigfUs v)t Great Brit. 'in, in which he maintains all the pre- tenfjons of the northern powers, or, in fail:, that she has no right ; that the ocean is free to all ; that neutrals may trade as they pl.afv , and in fine, that free bottoms make free goods. What period would there be to a war between France and England, were commerce plac^id upon thefe principles ? Is it not maniied that ill the difadvantages would belong to Britain, and all the benefits to her enemy ? How is she to maintain her indepLndcnce without her navy ? and how can she ufe this navy againd the tneniv, if she admit any free communication between him and his colonies, by means of neutrals? Is Mr. Baring ignorant that the ruling party in America have long endeavoured to interrupt the commerce that fubfids between them and Great Britain '■ That the prefident is pledged by his own publications, not to make peace with England until conceflions are admitted that will dcdroy her naval power r This man may \ roceed with money calculations, and he may, by figures, prove that Great Britain, with immenfe wealth and Ikill, even under every Relaxation pleaded for, would diil prefcrve her fupe» ! ,..V / B^aHfasa VjI il riority ; l>iit can he prove that she would be able to maintain it long ? Would not other nations rival her in trade, opprclT- '«! as she would nccelTarily be with maintaining her fleet and army, to fecure her independence ? Her commerce and iiianufadurcs would gradually decline, becaufc other nations would fell cheaper ; this would happen gradually, but it would not be the lefs fure, though it might not be percepti- ble at firli. But away with this mid calculation ; the quef^ tion is not about navigation profits, it concerns oip fccurity and exigence as a nation. In fpeaking of American difcontents, he wishes to prove that they have arifen from provocation on the part ot* our eoiintry, as bitter and irritable as ever was fufFcrsd by one liute from another. The provocation, he fays, was nothing Kfs than a fudden general fweeping, by the cruizers of this country, of all American velfcls that were failing to France :iik1 its dependencies, in the courfe of their a'^cuftomed al- lowed trade- in the year 1805, without any previous procla- mation or notice. Alas, poor England ! thy mofl favoured children arr.'ign thee for difcovcringa fraud and boldly pun- ishing it. The farce of landing and inftantly rcfoading the produce of the enemy, fometimts giving a bond whi.h was never afterwards paid, having been difcovercd, the fraud was itopptd. The people of America were irritated ; they were irritated by the lofs they had adually fudained, and more at tlie difcovery of their fraud. Some among them, however, adn)ittcd the jufticc of the captures, and never attempted to jultify, as JVlr. Baring has done, a fpecies of trade which every body in America knew to be in a great meafure a cloak to fend home the colonial produce to the enemy. Be- fides, the people of America are always more enraged a- j;ain(i British captures (han againfl thofe of France and iSpain, from the rule of calculation : Fiance and Spain can take very few of their ships, for they have very few crui- zers on the ocean ; the danger from thetn, therefore, cannot be very great ; but v.'hcn British ships begin to capture, they trernble tor all their ships — for where can they go that Britain cannot take them r Tins quedion is, however, laid alleep for the prefent, by the capture of all the enemy's colonies ; but I thought it ri;^ht to enter my proteft againft the foecious reafoning con- tained in Mr. Baring's pamphlet. He keeps every caufeof difpute between Great Britain and America out of fight, ex- cept the capture of their velfels i he docs not mention their 85 e a 5e- a- and can ui- not ire, :hat by it m- of ;x- leir pretenfions about feamen, fo hoflile in their nature, and fo dangerous to our independence. He does not fay that we have endeavoured to conciliate them, but in vain ; that their dvarice is infatiable ; that every thing mud give way to their intereft, or they are not to fee fatisfied. This note is already long, but mapy intierefting topics might be added. It might be shewn that as France has no Occafion to fend merchant ships to fea on account of the lindnefs of the Americans, she can employ every failor aboard her fleet, and thus her naval force is doubled. And it might be aflced, whether fuch an augmentation of naval power be of no difadvantage to Great Britain. It might alfo be proved that the fyftem of economy, a- dopted by America ; it it be beneficial to herfelf, (cf which 1 have doubts) renders her incapable of prcferving her neu- trality. To preferve peace, we muft be prepared for war. Without (hips of war, (he is obliged to fubmit to Bonapaite's decrees ; he knows that (he can do nothing, and his tyran- nical temper will not even allow her to blufter. Avarice will not fufFer her to give up trading with France, nor to equip a fquadron to maintain her refpedability, and her miferable fubmilfions are injurious to the interefts of Great Britain ; thofe injuries are therefore repelled by the latter nation, and at this America is furious. In fine the defence- lefs commerce of America, is one of th<* principal caufes of the prefent difficulties, not by inducing Great Britain to at- tack it, for no f^eet which.ftie is capable of furnifhing would be formidable to the Britiili j but bccaufe it induces Bona- parte to have recourfe to meafurcs which he would not haz- ard, could America block up his ports. . «;; Mr. Baring compares Great Britain to a Merchant, and mentions the difpute with Americans founded upon an er- roneous calculation. The comparifon may be proved in- correct, and the difpute founded not upon calculation ; but upon a matter of primary importance ; ** Whether Ameri- ca fliall be premitted to render our mofi: formidable bulwark of defence nugatory." Mr. Baring fliews himfelf an able advocate for America ; but like all partizans, he keeps eve- ry thing out of fight that makes againft him. What muft convince every impartial man that America is in the wrong, is that British adminiftrations of all p<^!itical parlies, have endeavoured to treat, but in vain — the States rejcA every condition, and will not even condefccnd to mention what they would have. To prove the great deltre wrtich the ;i 86 British Miniftry have uniformly shewn to treat wltli Amcf^ ica i I niight begin with \\}c offer of renewing Jay's treaty, and by detailing the diplomatic intcrcomfe fiiicc that time, it would appear that the prefent Government of the Vniic4 States arc determined not to treat ; not to be fatisficd— tticir rudcncfs to Mr. Jackfon, and their contemptible figure ii^ that tranfadlion is too rpccnt to require particular notice. The great talents of this ambassador, became a terror to the I*refident and his officers j findirjg themfclves uneqiial in converfation, they had recourfc to writing ; but their inferi- ority appearing ftill more confpic'uous, and dcfpairing of duping him as tney had duped his preilcccfl'or, ihey broke off all intercourfe. ! It is to be lamented that a man of Mr. Baring's talents and influence, should prove hjmfelf fo warm a partizan j had the charader of the Americans, efpecially of the domi- nant party, and their condudl fincc the French revolution been properly known In England, hjs reasonings would have had little weight. It is matter of joy that his opponents, if inferior in talents, will have the better cause ; and in con- futing him, they wiU only have to prove the juftice of pun- ishing fraud, Several of the remarks in this note arc taken from a letter of the late Mr. Fisher Ames to one of his friends. — He was a great lofer by the British captures in 1805, but his honefl heart acknowledged their jufl:ice. — I am glad of an opportu- nity of tefllfying my refpe£t for/-thfs virtuous and eloquent man, who was an honour to hiff-Cpuntry. — J shall conclude this note with a couple of quotations from writers wh will not be fufpeded of partiality to Great Britain, Extract from a letter addrejjed hy the Hon, Matthew Lyorif Member of Congrefsy to a Correfpondent hi t^ermont. In anfwer to one of the quedions you have put to me, I know of but little, if any good, Congrefs are doing by con- tinuing their Sellion. — To another, I fay, I can fee no ben- efit from the rcjedion of the treaty made by MelTrs. Munroe and Pinckney. — It might have faved us, had it been agreed to, from the embargo, which has been a curfe to the nation ever fince it was thought of. I know of no good to be ex- posed from the quarrel between our fccrc^^ary of ftate and Mr. Jackfon. I fee what I call a dangrrous prediledlion •in favour of Bonaparte ; and an unjuftifiable zeal to keep open and widen the breach with England on the part of my old friends, the republicans. rcaty, time, Jniic4 -tricir ire u\ loticc. to the u'dl in intcri- ing of oke off ialcnts tizan > ; doml- olution Id have lents, if in con- of pwn- a letter He was honed jportu- oquent onclude h. will w Lyon, ont, o me, I by con- no ben- Munroe i agreed e nation ) be ex- ate and le£lion to keep t of my «7 il Report for Ja iSo6, in the Monthly The Commerctt Magnziney contains the foliowing remarks : In a former number of our Magazine, we ftatcd the lead- ing features of the ilifputc between this country and Ameri- ca, refpe6ling the alledged unwarrantable capture of their V'liels. We tlien indcavourcd to exhibit tlic prccifc naturu of the complaint ; and though we might, in our unbiallcd opinion, have advr)catcd the principles upon which the Jx^ mcficans pretended to regulate their commerce with the belligerent powers, yet wc are aware that their pra6\ice is replete with fraud and collufion. That the Americans should have availed themfclves of any opportunity to extend their trade is not furprifing, but that our Government should fo long have tolerated this abuse, to the injury of our com- merce, is a flrong proof of the indulgence and lenity with which they have been treated, and of the unmixed defire in the British miniflry to cherish and preferve the relations of amity and good faith between the two countries. In the moral charaAcr of the American nation, however, there appears to be a radical dcfedf . Their intereft mufl: be made the primum mobile of every regulation, or they can never be pleafed. Their frauds and Itratagems have been dete£fed by Spain as well as by us, and a ferious mifunder- ftanding i$ dated to have taken place between them and that powt ; but againlt the mother country their whole ven- geance is diredled, and a long article has ^Appeared in the rJdtional Intelligencer^ the,.de mi-official paper of the exccuw tivc,^ animadverting f»n the injuries received from this country, and infinuatih. the detrrmination of the next con- grefs to retaliate on us by levying heavy prohibitory duties on our manufaftur^s imported, -ind to fufpend all intercourftf with us and our dependencies. In the a