% 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1)40 
 
 IIM 
 IM 
 
 M 
 
 1.8 
 
 
 1-25 1.4 1.6 
 
 
 4 6" 
 
 ► 
 
 y 
 
 <^ 
 
 /}. 
 
 ^3 
 
 ■e-2 
 
 
 /. 
 
 A 
 
 W^''W 
 
 > ^ 
 
 Oy^. 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 33 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTJRN Y 14580 
 
 (7161 872-4503 
 
 f^ 
 
 ■^er 
 
 \\ 
 
 ^s-^ 
 
 U 
 
 4f,. 
 
 O 
 

 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 «■ 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notat/Notos tachniquas at bibliographiquaa 
 
 Tha Inatituta has attamptad to obtairs tha bast 
 original copy availabia for filming. Faaturas of this 
 copy which may ba bibliographically uniqua. 
 which may altar any of tha imagas in tha 
 raproduction, or which may significantly chonga 
 tha usual mathod of filming, ara chacltad balow. 
 
 I "7 Colourad covars/ 
 LkJ Couvarture da coulaur 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Covars damagad/ 
 Couvartura andommagie 
 
 Covars rastorad and/or laminated/ 
 Couvartura rastauria at/ou palliculAa 
 
 Covar titia missing/ 
 
 La titre da couvartura manqua 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gAographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (I.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 RallA avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serrie peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion la long de la marge intirieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutAes 
 lors d'une restauration appar&issent dans le texte, 
 mais, iorsque cela Atalt possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas ixi film^es. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentairfts suppl^mentaires; 
 
 L'lnstitut a microfilm* la mailleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a AtA possible de se procurer. Les details 
 da cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuwent exiger une 
 modification dans la mithoda normale de filmage 
 soRt indiquAs ci-dessous. 
 
 T 
 t( 
 
 I I Coloured pages/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagies 
 
 Pages restored and/oi 
 
 Pages restaurias et/ou peliicul6es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxec 
 Pages d^colories, tachetAes ou piqudes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages ddtachdes 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Quality inigale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materii 
 Comprend du materiel supplimentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Mition disponible 
 
 I I Pages damaged/ 
 
 I I Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 I 7 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 I j Pages detached/ 
 
 r~y Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 I I Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 I I Only edition available/ 
 
 T 
 
 P 
 o 
 fi 
 
 C 
 b 
 tl 
 
 Si 
 
 o 
 fi 
 
 si 
 o 
 
 T 
 si 
 T 
 vt 
 
 N 
 d 
 ei 
 b( 
 ri{ 
 ri 
 rr 
 
 Pages wholly or partia'ily obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refiimed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 filmies A nouveau de fa^on d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film* au taux de reduction indiquA ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 y 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 
 
 
 16X 
 
 
 
 
 20X 
 
 
 
 
 24X 
 
 
 
 
 28X 
 
 
 
 
 32X 
 
 
'e 
 
 Atails 
 IS du 
 nodifier 
 ir una 
 ilmage 
 
 The copy filmad hera has baan raproducad thanks 
 to tha ganarosity of: 
 
 National Library of Canada 
 
 Tha imagas appaarirg hara ara tha bast quality 
 possibia considaring tha condition and lagibility 
 of tha original copy and in kaaping with tha 
 filming contract spacifications. 
 
 Original copias in printad papar covars tn filmad 
 baginning with tha front covar and anding on 
 tha last paga with a printad or illustratad impras- 
 sion, or tha back covar whan approprirta. All 
 othar original copias ara filmad baginning on tha 
 first page with a printad or illustratad impras- 
 sion. and anding on tha last paga with a printad 
 or illustratad imprassion. 
 
 IS 
 
 L'axamplaira film* f ut raproduit grica A la 
 gdnArositi da: 
 
 BibliothAqua nationala du Canada 
 
 Las imagas suivantas ont M raproduitas avac la 
 plus grand soin. compta tanu da la condition at 
 da la nattatA da l'axamplaira f ilmd. at an 
 conformity avac las conditions du contrat da 
 filmaga. 
 
 Las axamplairas originaux dont la couvartura an 
 papiar est imprimAa sont filmis 9n comman9ant 
 par la pramiar plat at an tarminant soit par la 
 darniira paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 d'imprassion ou d'illustration, soit par la sacond 
 plat, salon la cas. Tous las autras axamplairas 
 originaux sont filmte an commandant par la 
 pramiAra paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 d'imprassion ou d'illustration at an tarminant par 
 la darnlAra paga qui comporta una talla 
 amprainta. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol ^^> (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or tha symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 darniAre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbole — ► signifie "A SUIVRE ". le 
 symbols y signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc.. may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 filmAs A des taux de reduction diffArents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul clichA. il est filmA A partir 
 de Tangle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nAcessaire. Las diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mAthode. 
 
 errata 
 to 
 
 pelure, 
 >n A 
 
 n 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
i4^ 
 
 n 
 
 ON MONEY 
 
 AND OTIIKU 
 
 TRADE QUESTIONS 
 
 HKIN(i A ItlCVlKW OF 
 
 MR. WALLACE'S SPEECH 
 
 ON AN INCONVKirnnLE crKKKNOY. 
 
 HY 
 
 y. L. fP. O'lUMLY, C><'il Engineer. 
 
 HH 2705 
 03 
 
 miCE, IS CElSiT'S. 
 
 
 OTTAWA. 
 I'lUMKI' HV r. W. MITCllKl.L, 1:, s AM. 10 !:i,(;l.\ .STIfKKT. 
 
 t'^ 
 
r 1 
 
 
 # 
 
 
 % 
 
 !♦ 
 
 National Library Bibliotheque nationale 
 of Canada du Canada 
 
 
 
ON MONEY 
 
 AND OTHER 
 
 TRADE QUESTIONS 
 
 BEINU A REVIEW OP 
 
 MR. WALLACE'S SPEECH 
 
 ON AN INCONVEUTJBLE Cl'llKENOY. 
 
 uv 
 
 J. L. ^. 
 
 O'HAJ^LY, Civil Engineer. 
 
 I>IIICE:. is OEISTTS. 
 
 OTTAWA; 
 PRINTED DY C. W. MITCHUM., tl, S AND 10 ELGIN STREET. 
 
03 
 
 IDS- 
 
 ^^^^^^^^i^J^^l^^^^^^ 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 e thonwnd 
 ne office of 
 
 TO THE READER : 
 
 The writer of the following pages feels, from his own ex- 
 perience, that it is impossible to understand triule questions 
 without a complete mastery of the functio?^s of money. Did 
 the masses once thoroughly understand these, political jugglers 
 <ould no longer conjure them into believing erroneous doctrines 
 on commercial questions. He can assure the reader that he 
 has no party intert^sts to subserve, no hobby to bolster 
 up. Although himself an advanced Liberal, he has no party 
 alliances, no partnership in any " machine " to hamper his 
 judgment or prejudice his opinions. His sole desire in the 
 present undertaking is to examine the machinery and working 
 of an imiDortant social problem. He impugnt. not the motives 
 of those holding opinions differing from his own, nor has he any 
 reason to doubt their sincerity. How far he has succeeded in 
 brushing away the cobwebs which lie strewn in the 
 path of the earnest inquirer after truth, he leaves to the 
 judgment of an impartial public, humbly bowing to its decision, 
 and scrupulously abiding by its verdict. He has devoted but a 
 very few days to his tr.sk, so that it goes forth with all its im- 
 perfections on its head. His sole motive is to add his mite to 
 the general stock of human happiness. He will feel amply re- 
 warded should this feeble attempt he the initiative of a dis- 
 cussion from which correct principles are evolved on a question 
 so deei^ly atiecting every member of the human family. 
 
 Ottawa, May, 1882. 
 
 The Author. 
 
)lf 
 
►5 MONEY AND OTHEK TRADE QUESTIONS 
 
 BEING A REVIEW OF MR, WALLACES SPEECH ON AN 
 INCUNVEIITIBLE CURRENCY. 
 
 ]>RKMMINAKY KKMARKH. 
 
 Before entering on a review of Mr. Wallace's argnnientHin favor of an 
 
 |inconvertible currency, it is jMUtinent to define houio expressions of frequent 
 
 [occurrence in tlie diHcussion of economic questions. Value is one of thess. 
 
 I There are two kinds of value — ralne in huh and Wf/in- in err/iaiKjC It is 
 
 in tlie latter s(miso the expression is used hy economists. A thing to havo 
 
 valui' must have cost laltor, either in appropiiating it, or in producing it, 
 
 and sometimes in prcsjTving it. A thing whicli can l»e got without lalior, 
 
 even though :imoiigst the mo.st useful of sub.stances, ccnimands no value, 
 
 Iteciiiise a peison will not give anything useful or agreeal)le, which lie 
 
 possesses, and wliicl. has eost him lalior for that which he can get without. 
 
 Tne value of a coi iiuodity is its purchasing power, or the quantity of any one 
 
 thing or of things in general, f«ir which it will exchange. lfal>arrelof 
 
 llour will excliange for a jiair of hoots, then one value of a harnd of Hour 
 
 is a piir of Itoots. The /)rice of a comiuolity is Us value in money, oi tiie 
 
 amount of mouev foi which it will excliau<»e. If a hiishel of wheat is st»l(l 
 
 for a dollar, then the price or money value of the liushel of wheat is one 
 
 dollar. 
 
 1 hav(' not in this paper attempted to cla.ssify Mr. Wallace's argu- 
 ments, as, from their iii(;olierence and inconsistency with one another, they 
 are not susct'ptil>le of an intclIigiMc classilication. Morcovei-. their crU'lities 
 and fallacies are murli more ellectually exposed by talcing them Hinintiui 
 than l)y any |»ossilile groupings. 
 
 FAPTS WHICH ARE NOT FACTS. 
 
 Says Mr. Wallace {lI,i„H<i)d, .'.',(/i April, IXS!) : — 
 
 " I submit, Sir, two i)ri)positions which I think will not be gainsaid. One 
 is, that it is a fact that tiie jieriodical panics or crii^e^ which sweep over the (wm- 
 :uei(iftl world, bringing niiii and misery in their train, arc cauaed by a defective 
 inuuctary system ; and the other fact that there is nothing without a cause." 
 
 How can iiof/iimi have a cause? His latter fact is a very loose, un- 
 scientific mode of expressing the law of causality, or the sequence of cause 
 and eti'ect. The other so-called fact is but a bald assertion, and so little a 
 
fact tliat it in univerHally (lonietl by uvery one conversant with the pheuoiu- 
 «|iun called a cnmiiiercial criHiii. 
 
 COMMoniTIRH NOT MONEY KAKNRD. 
 
 " Money is unlike anything else. There in no Huch thing among the pro. 
 (luctions of nature as money. Men cannot make money. They can earn it." 
 
 Ih theru rtiiv hucIi thinjif among th«^ proiluctions of naturo as a loaf t>f 
 luvad { or an nxv t or a ploiigii I or a Hheet (»f {wpcr . Vrrv few natural pi'o- 
 (luctH are tit for thn use of huiuuii heingH without undergoing many changes, 
 oftitu a c'()tnpl(H(> trau8formation. If men cannot make money, pray, who 
 does '( M«'U earn commodities not mom^y. The farm laborer, for example, 
 earns farm pro<luce, and he can earn nothing else, for farm produce of aomo 
 kind is the ultinuite result of his lahor. The factory hand earns a manu- 
 factured article, for that too is the ultimate result of his labor. A tacit 
 CO partnership »'xists iu'twciui the fanner and his workman. The former 
 furnishes the cnpital and the latter supplies the labor. Tlie coud>inatioii 
 of labor and capital is necessary to production. The farmer and the work- 
 man share the product among them on the teims implitMl in the deed of 
 partnei-ship. In the same way the factory hand shares with the capitalist the 
 manufactured article, which is th«' product of the labor of the one combined 
 with the capital of the other. The mint^r in the precious metals similarly 
 Hhares with the capitalist the jiroiluct of their united labor and capital, which 
 is gold or silver. 'I'he min(*r, it is seen, is the only person wlio can earn 
 money, for he earns the commodity from which money is uiiule. Tlu^ 
 farmer aiul the manufacturer insteail of giving their workmen their share 
 of the profluct, whether wheat or cloth, in these commodities, sell the ar- 
 ticles for them, and hand them their share in the form of monc^y. This i.s 
 not only a great convenience, l)ut a great gaiii to the laborers, for it saves 
 them the time which they would ncicessariiy lose in dis;)osing of th«'ir 
 shaie, while entailing no additional lo.ss on the farmer and manufacturer, 
 who ari! sellers anyhow. 
 
 COININC; .V Pl'HLir (iUAUANTEE OF WEIGHT AND KIXKNK.SS. 
 
 " If ft man makes money and nuts more gold or silver into it than .shouM be 
 in the coin he in making, it is called a ctime, and he is liable to punishment." 
 
 Can anything bo more absurd ? Gold and silver became a medium of 
 exchange long before coining was thought of. Coining necessarily grew 
 out of their a ioption as money, being a contrivance to save weighing and 
 assaying at each succe.ssivs exchange. The stamp is simply a public 
 guarantee, often the only guarantee, which the receiver of the coin can 
 have of its genuineness, or that it is of the standard weight and fineness. 
 It is well known that if a gold coin is worn or clipped, its value is depre- 
 ciated in exact proi)ortion to its loss of weight, the stamp to the con- 
 trary notwitlistanding. An ounce ot gold, whether as coin or bullion, is 
 precisely of the same value, at least, it is so where the state coins without a 
 seignorage. Coining is prohibited and made penal, not because the uu- 
 
 itttbo^ 
 
 iard, 
 
 ipuric 
 
 (poveri 
 
 jmistal 
 
 fevevyl 
 
 citiz«i 
 
 ,it woi 
 
 'ceiveil 
 
 to i)r< 
 
 |)roUil 
 
 % 
 
 \ 
 
 aUi«| 
 
 J tweel 
 ' deter 
 nor l| 
 •ard< 
 
 I 
 
 iniUi 
 appv 
 
 crct 
 
 nioi 
 
 wh 
 
 tin 
 
 wi 
 
 lio 
 
 if 
 d 
 
•tlitiiephenoM,. 
 
 "'noDK the pro 
 •Mn earn it." 
 
 "'•'•'w a loaf of 
 '**' "Htui-ul i,ro- 
 "•anv clian^rHs 
 
 ♦ |o'- oxainpjp 
 
 '"•"« a inuiiu. 
 
 "k ^ '''''' 
 ^ne roniit»r 
 
 cp'nl)iu«tiou 
 "d the wojj^.. 
 ' the flwU of 
 '"/>itHlist thr 
 ""'coinl)ii„.cJ 
 "'« siniihi,.]^, 
 
 ^/"■faJ, which 
 
 ''<> oftn onvn 
 
 "i.ulo. Th,, 
 
 t''"''- sJi.tiH 
 
 «<'!! the „,• 
 
 J'- 'fiii.sis 
 
 ^0«" it SHVes 
 
 '»,!,' of th.Mr 
 lufactuici- 
 
 i»ent." 
 
 6<Hiiii] of 
 'jy grew 
 "»g Hiul 
 t piihlie 
 'oin can 
 
 flepre- 
 '^ con- 
 lion, is 
 flout a 
 ^e un. 
 
 uthorized coins contain more of the precious metals than the legal stan- 
 ard, but for preciHely the opposite reiison — to prevent the circulation of 
 purious coins. No one would lie such an idiot as to put more gold in a 
 overeign than he eoull sell it for. Hut though a man made such » clumsy 
 istake, he could Hell the coin for its full value according to weight. But 
 !every vagabond, and even Homo who would aHpiru to pass as honorable 
 citi/enH, would liko to put leHH than the standard quantity in the coin, for 
 (it would be an easy way of amuMHiug a fortune at the expense of tkkv re- 
 'ceiverH of spurious coins if Iuh nefarious conduct puHsed undetected. It is 
 to pi-event tliiH kind of fraud that coining has by common couHont bticu 
 .prohibited, and the issuers of uuauchoi'i/ed coins declared i.-riminals. 
 
 I I;hK of MONKY Tt) KA(IL1,TATK E.XCHANUE of <0MM0|)ITIE8. 
 
 i " Its use is to measure values aud facilitate theu' ^■•hauge." 
 
 ; Facilitate the exchange of what ? Of valu« . Commodities, not 
 
 15' values, ar«( those which exchanj^'c for on<* another. Value is a relation be- 
 j tween two or more connnodities, of whioh co : of p 'oduction Is the chief 
 : determiin >g element. If a bushel of wheut will excluint." tur neither more 
 ; nor less liian tive yards of cotton, then the buslie' f wheat ami the five 
 •ards of cotton are at that partculai time and piico of the same valuo. 
 
 I 
 
 SOMK KKKKCTS OF I-KCJAL TEXDER ISSl'K. 
 
 " If the Parliament of this country were to start ,1 printing jiross and create 
 millions of lej^nl tender U')tes, and yive a gram of them to any iudividual, 1 
 apprehend tha» grant would make liim rich." 
 
 There in not the least doubt of it, b\it it would be by robbing every 
 creditor, every (contractor, every annuitant, and every receiver of a Hxed 
 money payment. There is not a mortgaijor or othf.'r d(d»tor in tlu country 
 who would not purchase such notes for the express purpose of defrauiling 
 their creditors, and they would be willing to share their ill-gotten gains 
 with the privileged inlividual. J'mt for any other purpose they (the mil- 
 lions of lei^al tender notes) would be utterly worthless. 
 
 IJONDS AND DKHKNTUUKS A I.IKX OX J'ROI'KHTV. 
 
 "And if you were to start a |>rinting iiress and make bonds and debentures. 
 if they are wealth you can make men rich by giving them these bonds and 
 debentures." 
 
 Bonds and debentures, no more than any other pieces of pa|)er, can 
 nmke no one rich, except in so far as they constitute a lieu or mort^jago 
 on some property. How much richer is the man who has got a hundred, 
 thousand doUais of the bonds and debentures of a railroad company whose 
 road has no existence ? Just al)out as much as is the man who has got 
 the mortgage of a property to wliich the mortgagor has no title. 
 
 VALUE OF XIOXEV IS WHAT IT WILL EXCHANGE FOR. 
 
 "What i8 the value of money ? It is not valuable because it is made of a 
 commodity uf value ; its usefulness Is its value." 
 
8 
 
 The value of money, like all othei useful or agreeable things pi-ocured 
 bj labor, is the quantity of any one commodity or of commodities in gene- 
 ral for which it will exchange. If a $20 gold cciii wil' exchange for a 
 certain kind of stove, then one of the values of that coin is that stove. 
 There is not in nature a thing more useful than air It is absolutely 
 indisi)ensubie to animal and vegetable life. Without it the earth would 
 l)e a chaotic waste. Yet it has no value ; no one would give anything 
 for a quantity of it, because he can have as much as he wants of it for 
 nothing. 
 
 WHAT CONSTITITES VALUE. 
 
 In order that a thing may have value it is necessary that it must 
 Lave some use, satisfy some desire, answer some purpose, and that labor 
 Las been exp mded on it, either in its appropriation or production. For 
 no one would part with that which answers some purpose and which has 
 cost hiui labor in acquiring it for what he can get for nothing. 
 
 HUMAN" LAW CAN' CKKATK NO COMMODITY. 
 
 '■Then money is a commodity created by the law." 
 
 Huniiiu l;iw, no doubt, is nu^aut. Everyone knows that human law 
 cin create no commodity. You niiii;ht h^islate till Dooiiisday, and if no- 
 boily ploui;lH'(l or sowed, rea})e(l or tlimshed, ground or baked, you 
 would have no bread. 
 
 "A barrt'l of Hour that costs $10 is nu more valuable as an article of food 
 thai; it' it only cost 81." 
 
 The b.u Tcl of llour would, in the one case as in the other, be just as 
 useful foi- the suppoi't of lit\', ami so would it be to one who got a gift ot 
 it, but celt liiily noo as valualiU'. .Suppose the barrel of tlour wa.s only 
 worth a dollar, and that a miller had to exchange flour foi- a coat worth 
 .*S!in. In this cas'! one coat would be worth ten ))arivls of tlour. Suppose 
 ac:ain that the barrel of tlour was worth .*1U, then one barrel of Hour 
 would be woi ill one coat. It is needless to ask the miller which barrel of 
 Hour he considers tlie most valuable. The iiiauua ot the Israelites was 
 just as useful as if they labored to pioihict! it ; and would in their tluni 
 circuinstaiices be exceedingly valuabh' if a few of them could monopoli,.e it. 
 
 NKKDS KXr'LAINI.Nc;. 
 
 Who will explain this ? 
 
 "The ((iiantity of money rej^ulates its selling price, its marketable value, th« 
 same as any otlier roiuinudity ; but it dues not regulate its money price ?" 
 
 What is the selling price of a thing but its money price ? (/.''.,) the 
 amount of inouey for which it will exchange. If an ounce of gold in bul- 
 lion was worth more than an ounce in c )in-', the t-oins would be melted 
 int(i bullion. If, on the contrary, an ounce of gold in coins was worth 
 more than an ounce in bullion, the holders of bullion would soon present it 
 at the mint to be coined. 
 
« 
 
 9 
 
 {■ocured 
 n gene- 
 je for a 
 t stove, 
 solutely 
 li would 
 nything 
 f it for 
 
 it must 
 at labor 
 n. For 
 lich has 
 
 (iian law 
 d if ne- 
 ed, you 
 
 of food 
 
 THE CAUSE OF CHANGE IN THE PRICE OF COMMODITIES. 
 
 ** A dollar of monev that would buy twenty pounds of butter is no more val- 
 uable than a dollar that would buy ten pounds of outter." 
 
 No dollar can perform this function at one and the same time and 
 place, unless that one kind of butter is of very inferior quality, and the 
 other a very superior, or that the owner of the butter is a fool. The tem- 
 porary fluctuations of the market depend on the demand and supply of 
 commodities in that mark<it. Suppose that through an abundant harvest 
 last year, a bjvrrel of Hour sold for $4, while a yard of broadcloth sold 
 for $2. In this state of the market a barrel of flour exchanges for two 
 j'ards of cloth. Suppose that owing to vicissitudes of seasons that a barrel 
 of flour is this year worth .^12, with the cloth at its former price. A 
 barrel of Hour will now be worth six yards of cioth, or will exchange for 
 three times as much cloth as last year. Jn the plentiful year the barrel of 
 flour exclmni'ed for two yards of cloth, in the scarce vear for six. It is 
 manifest that the change in the price of Hour has not arisen from any 
 olmnge in the value ot money, but from the difference of vield between the 
 scant and bountiful harvests. In the abundant year the liushel of wheat 
 eo.-;t the fanner, say GO cents ; in the scarce season it has cost him $1.JS0. 
 In order to give liiui e<jual profit on the .same laiioi' and capital in each 
 year, he must get triple the price for the jtroduct of the scarce season that 
 he got fof that of the alniudant one, for by ihe hypothesis the yield is only 
 on(!-thircl. 
 
 just as 
 a gift ot 
 vas only 
 it worth 
 Suppose 
 
 of Hour 
 l)arrel of 
 itcs was 
 eir then 
 
 )nli/,e it. 
 
 alue, the 
 ?" 
 
 .fi.,) the 
 d in bul- 
 melted 
 as worth 
 )re8ent it 
 
 PiriCHASINC I'OWICK OK MuNEV TlIK SAMK, IH)WE\VEVKR 0HTA1XED. 
 
 "A dollar of money that takes two days labor to earn is no more valuable 
 for the payment of debt than a dollar that is earned by one day's labor," 
 
 Nor is a stolen dollar less valuable for the same purpose. No one 
 labors for dollars except the miners in the pt'ec'oiis ni'^tals : and ultimately 
 even these, like all others, generally labor for coi.^uniable eoniniodities. 
 
 Tin: LAW CANNOT CONVKRT A THIX(i OF NO VALUE INTO A TIlINd OF VALUE. 
 
 " Well, the law can take an article that is of no value, and by converting it 
 into money, can yive it a value." 
 
 This sta*^ement is ambiguous, and needs explanation. If it is meant 
 that the Governinout can by its Hat convert a thing of small into a 
 thing of great value, as a piece (yf nickel worth one cent, which, if n)ade of 
 gold, would be wortli ??l(l, Mr. WUace is entirely mistak"-n. as he 
 would find out on presenting it to the first trader. Hut, if he would say 
 to the trader, " Mr. A, if you accept thi.s nicked coin as if it were gold, . 
 assure you that whenever you or any other person present it at my counter 
 I will pay ij?10 in gold, ' the trader would accept the nickel if he had 
 sutHcient confid(rnce in the credit of the issuer to redeem it as promised. 
 
10 
 
 THE USAGES OF CIVILIZED SOCIETY COMPEL NO ONE TO PART WITH HIS PKO- 
 
 PERTY WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 
 
 "No man can be compelled to sell anything for money, whether it is made of 
 paper, gold or silver ; but, having gold, he may be compelled to take money in 
 payment." 
 
 This is as extraordinary as it is senseless. If the la\/ will compel a 
 man to sell his gold for nothing, (for it is presumed that Mr. Wallace refeva 
 to inconvertible pai)er), it can also compel another to sell his whfat for 
 nothing ; and the compulsory process would be much simi)litied in the 
 case of th" whpat, as gold, representing great value in small bulk, is much 
 easier hidden than wheat, and does not deteriorate in concealment, 
 
 AN INVARIABLE MEASURE OF ANY MATERIAL SUBSTANCE IMPOSSIBLE. 
 
 " A measure to be of any value must be a fixed quantity." 
 
 There is no denying that an invariable is much preferable to a variable 
 measui'e of any kind. But an invariable measure of anv material sub- 
 stance has no existence in nature. Tt is a mathematical conception. 
 There is an invarial)le measure of tune, the sidereal day, or the tin.e which 
 the earth takes in making one revolution on its axis. 
 
 ALL EX(IIAX(iE IS BARTER. 
 
 " If that is not money, it simply becomes barter, exchanging one commodity 
 of value fur another." 
 
 \1I exchange is barter whether money is introduced or not. What is 
 a sale followed by a purchase but barter? If A, a former, sells to B, a 
 grocer, 100 lbs. of butter at 20 cts. per lb., receiving therefor $20, and 
 B st'Us to A 40 IVks. of tea at HO cts. i)er lb., making i^20, is not that 
 barter? But if A, instead of selling his butter to B, sells it to C, a doc- 
 tor, for the same price, and buys his tea from B as l>efore, it is evident 
 that he is still bartering his butter for the tea. In tact, butter, if noiL his 
 only, is evidently his most convenient, means at the time of procuring tea. 
 But how with the doctor, is he also bartering, and wiuit has he to barter 
 against A's biitter i Not being a miner, nor a capitali*<t, his only means of 
 subsistence is his skill and lalior. He has set a limb for B, and instead of 
 taking tea to exchange with A for V>utter, he takes money, being more 
 convenient, which again returns to l), through the hands of A. Ho that all 
 exchange of commodities, disguised as it may^ is finally re.solved into 
 barter. 
 
 A CHANGE IN VALUE OF MONEY DOES NOT CHANGE THE RELATIVE VALUES OF 
 
 COMMODITIES. 
 
 " Money should have no real value ; because its increase in volume may so 
 decrease the value of other articles that they cannot be produced at the price at 
 which they would have to be exchanged into money, and the production would 
 have to stop, because they would not pay for production." 
 
 An increase or diminution in the quantity of money does not in the 
 slightest degree affect values, though it does prices. Suppose, on a 
 
11 
 
 I 
 
 in the 
 on a 
 
 particular day, that a barrel of flour sold for $6, and a yard of broadcloth 
 for $1.50. It is obvious that a barrel of flour was then worth four yarda 
 of cloth. Suppose that next day the money of the community was 
 doubled, say by a miracle, so that everyone who had a coin or a j^ote in 
 his pocket found two there the next morning. All commodities wculd 
 rise in jrice; and exactly in the proportion that the circulating niediinii 
 was ip.creased, so that the barrel of flour which yesterday sold for $G 
 would to-day sell for $12, and the yard of cloth would sell also tor !?."J. 
 It is at once seen that nothing but money has changed in value. For 
 to-day, as yesterday, a Vjarrel ot flour just exchanges for four yards of 
 cloth ; and so with everything else. All commodities have risen in money 
 price, but $1 yesterday would puichase as much connaoditie.s m $2 to-day. 
 
 HOW TIIK SOCIETY ARE AFFECTED BY CHANGES IN THE CCKRENCY. 
 
 There are other ]n'ocesses besides magic by which the circulating 
 medium may be rendered redundant. Sui)pose it is done l:»y the issue ot 
 Exchequer bills, paid out to workmen, and they reniiim in circulation. 
 The effecj on prices will be the same. All comiuodities will rise in price 
 in proportion to the addition to the currency. If the currency is iloubled 
 prices will be doubled. In both suppositious all creditors will suffer by the 
 depreciat'on, as well as ab persons receiving fixed money payments. But 
 the working classes will, in the latter case, be the gieatest sutlereis from 
 the inHatioij. For pricts rise much quicker and in gi'eater strides th<n 
 do wages, even, from day to day engagements ; and the iujustige is still 
 more severely felt under lahoi contracts. But when the ju'ecious metals 
 and convertible psiper constitute the currency inflation is checked before 
 much mischief can be done. For so soon as the liolcfei- of gold finds its 
 pui'chasing power diminishing, he will export it like any other commodity ; 
 and the exportation will cease only when the price of gold ri.ses to a level 
 with other ciuntrics. Nor could the most r^strictivt! Irgislatiou prevent 
 the exportation. JiJ converse, if the cvn-rency is scant, ihe prices of all 
 things will fall, and thac too exactly in proportion to the conn-action. 
 But as all values will b^ alike afl'ected, the change will only be felt in 
 existing contracts, and engagements to pay flxed sums of money. The 
 working classes rather proht by a oonti'action of the currency, particularly 
 those who have pre*^i0us\y entered into labor conti-at :>s, for wages seldom 
 fall as quickly as ])rices ; and therefore, while money wages is unchangeil, 
 wages in kiiul or real ^>age-t are increased, so that the very opposite ett'ects 
 on the laboring c'asst:-; are produced by changes in the currency to tho<e 
 fancied by Mr. Wallace. But if the currtncy is on a gold basis, so soon 
 as it becomes scant the purchasing power of the i)recious metals having 
 increased, it will be profitable to import them, and accordingly they will 
 be inqior ed tintil the vacuum is tilloKl up, when prices will attain their 
 normal condition. 
 
 COMMODITIES UNUSED PRODUCE NOTHING. 
 
 "If you put away $1 for one hundred years it will ouly be $1 at the end,, 
 unless the value has been changed by law." 
 
12 
 
 What if it happened to be a paper dollar that was secreted, and the 
 bank bnrst in the interval 1 The great«!r number of valuable things, if 
 p it away for that time, would leave nothins; but dust behind. Su that 
 even in the hoarding process the preciout metals have an undoubtedly 
 great advantage over commodities generally. 
 
 MONEY ALWAYS VALUABLE. 
 
 " A. man might possible [possibly] have in his pockets all the money in the 
 world, and yet it would be of no value until parted with." 
 
 Let Mr. Wallace ask the possessor of money convertible into gold if 
 this is his opiaion, and I venture to say that he would receive a decidedly 
 negative reply. Here Mr. Wallace, as usual, c mfounds use with exchange 
 value. Of what use is a warehouse full of cotton cloth to a manufacturer 
 until he parts with it. Everything which a person possesses in excess 
 of his own cousu 'Option is useless to him until he parts with it as well 
 us money, but not the less valuable. 
 
 A VALUELESS MONEY IMPOSSIBLE. 
 
 " A valuftless money is a perfect money." 
 
 There can be uo such thing as a value' !.ss money, for the instant it 
 liecomes valueless it ceases to be money. A valueless money meiins money 
 which has no value in exchange, a thing for whicli no person wOuld give 
 :iny couiniodity. Any kind of money, how much soever depreciated, to 
 o ntinue in circulation, must hfive some value. The <iUO franc Aasiyuatu, 
 which exchanged for a pound ot butter, had still some value left. 
 
 PATRIOTISM V. KACi-MGN'EV. 
 
 MO.NEV r. CAPITAL. 
 
 "If a man has .^l,()ti() in ))aj)er u.oney, the value of which exists only in the 
 couiitiy of its creation, while it may not lie worth ten cents outside that ';ountry, 
 he has an iuceiitiv-e to suiipurt its institutions, in addition to his patriotism, l)e- 
 tause he kho-.vs if the country goes down his money will he valueless. But the 
 nia)i with a .?l,i>.Mt of gold in the bank, which he knows will be taken in any 
 part of the world, ca:i readily withdraw it and leave his country if it should get 
 into difhcuhy : he is not obliged to tight its battles." 
 
 Of all till- reasons evi^r urgir I for cliiiugin:? the currency of a country, 
 this is the most extraorcliu uy and fai'-fetehed. Mr. Wallacj .seems iii- 
 c;ii).iblo of seeing the distinction between money and capitid. Very few 
 imlividu lis, even in the weathi-st countries, ha/e much of their wealth in 
 money. It is geufraily in n-claini'^d land and its improvements, ia roads, 
 iu railways, in canals, in buildings, in machinery, in materials and in 
 tinished unconsumjd products. I Ij.-jlieve I am within the mark in esti- 
 jiritiug the whole wealth of Canada at one hundred billions of dollars ; and 
 of this ther! is littl-^ over six million dolUrs in specie, or one-sixt«eu 
 thousandth part of the whole Jt is thus seen what an insignificant part 
 of th-) wealth of a community consisis of money. There i-", however, little 
 doubt that the substitution of an inconvertible for a convertibi currency 
 would kee[) capital and immigration from the country. 
 
 
13 
 
 sd, and the 
 
 e things, if 
 
 I. So that 
 
 indoubiedly 
 
 aoney in the 
 
 into gold if 
 a decidedly 
 ith exchange 
 nanufacturer 
 sea in excess 
 th it as well 
 
 he instant it 
 nieins money 
 m w6uld give 
 'preciateil, to 
 iiic Aasiyuiits, 
 left. 
 
 ists only in the 
 ethat '.ouutry, 
 patriotism, he- 
 iiess. But the 
 taken in any 
 it should get 
 
 of a country, 
 acii seems lu- 
 ll. Very lew 
 bell wealth in 
 euts, ia roads, 
 terials and in 
 
 mark in esti- 
 if dollars ; and 
 r oue-sixt«en 
 igniticaut part 
 however, little 
 •tib) currency 
 
 MONEY IS THE INSTRUMENT OF EXCHANGE. 
 
 " Money is the motor by which production and commerce is moved." 
 
 If Mr. Wallace had substituted " money is the instrument l>y which 
 products are most conveniently exchanged," his sinuh ^ould liit nearer 
 the mark, for therein consists its sole use. 
 
 THE PURCHASING POWER OF MONEY VARIES INVERSELY AS ITS i^UANTITY. 
 
 " Money, whether of gold, silver or paper, will decrease in purchasing power 
 in accordance with its inciea-sing ([uantity." 
 
 Mr. Wallace here has got a glimps*^ of the truth. The statement is 
 strictly correct with regard to an inoouvertibls currency, and would be .so 
 likewise of the jtivcious metals if it were impcssible to export or import 
 them. 
 
 MONEY WHEN EXCHANGED IS SOI.O. 
 
 '•Every time you exchange money you redeem it. If the baker pays it to 
 the miller, or the miller to the farmer, is it not redeemed ?" 
 
 Most assuredly not. When tlie baker parts with uumey for tlonr. he 
 sells it (money), and the miller purchases it, just as he does the farmer's 
 wheat. 
 
 FEATS IN FINANCIAL LEGERDEMAIN. 
 
 " It is true 1 advocate a money that wouM not be convertible in a Govern- 
 ment institution into gold ; but it is a muu-y that would l)e convertible into 
 other things, and empowered l)y the law to be convertilile into everything else, 
 though not redeemable in everything." 
 
 To call this style of reasoning sophistry would be dignifying it. It is 
 
 1| downright invincible stupidity. How can that which is not redeemable in 
 
 any given article be redeemable in every aitiele ; and as to converting 
 
 money into anything else but UKMUiy or bullion is w. logical as w»'ll as a 
 
 I physical absurdity. Xor does Mr. Wallace inform us who shall be the re- 
 
 I deemer. Assuming that he intends the Goverum»-nt. 1 present mv.self at 
 
 I the Finance Minister's bureau with a jBlO,n(H) f-hiu-plaster, for which I de- 
 
 ^; maud Hour. He will tell me that he is ueitlier a farnnr nor a miller. I 
 
 :; answer, '' lint, look here, boss, you jiromise to redeem this heie note in 
 
 I everything." " Ah I ipiite true, my dear sir, but not in any given article. 
 
 i You see flour is a given article, therefore, you are pn-eludci ly the very 
 
 ■j terms of its issue from demandinii: it ; a id so with cverv other thins;." 
 
 4 Hence Mr. Wallaces e(V'/7////t»// when analysefl means nothiinj. 
 
 m PRODUCTION CARRIED ON HV LAHOK AND CAPITAL. 
 
 I " The worst money of all is a scarce money, liecause it being scarce stops 
 
 ; commerce for the lack of a medium of exchange by which the productions of one 
 I man can be exchanged for those of another. Commerce is stopped and produc- 
 tion ceases ; this I hold is one of the causes of the depression thiough which we 
 have passed. The scarcity of money prevented the exchange of productions at 
 profitable rates, therefore production had to cease as no man couhl pay the rate 
 uf interest demanded for money." 
 
14 
 
 Production not only would not cease, but must be carried on, though 
 there was not a single coin in the wliole world ; otherwise civilized society 
 would soon be deciujated by starvation, and speedily i-elajjse to the lowest 
 degradation of savage life — nomadic huntei-s. So long as production con- 
 tinued, commerce or exchange of commodities would be carried on. The 
 wheels of commerce would not be stopped, only badly handicapped if money 
 were supei-seded altogether. The diiierence between the state of commerce 
 with and without a medium of exchange may be compared to the diiierence 
 between travelling by rail and trudging on foot through a trackless forest. 
 
 PROFIT THE EXCE.SS OF PRODUCTION OVER CONSUMPTION. 
 
 Mr. Wallace seems not to underatand the vf ry elements of his problem. 
 Profit is the excess of production over consumption. If a farmer has a 
 capital of 1,000 bushels of wheat consumed in the production of 1,?00 
 bushels, then his profit is 200 bushels, or 20 per cent, on his capital, 
 i'rotit therefore is not the '•esult oi exchange, but of production. If I 
 have a barrel of flour which has cost me ten days' Jabor, why do I 
 exchange it for a coat ? It is because the coat has also cost ten days' 
 labor. It is evident that wheat or othtr agricultural y)roduce is the only 
 capital which a farmer has, for in the division of lab r he devotes his 
 whole time and energies to tilling the soil, nor can Le have any other 
 means of profit but the excess of his production over his consumption. 
 Whatever other commodities he at any time possesses are obtained by 
 exchanging some of his own capital (farm produce) for that of some other 
 person who in like manner has produced it. If he wants shoes or coats 
 or hats, he has nothing else to give the shoemaker, the tailor or the hatter 
 lor these articles but farm produce, for all his wealth is in that form. 
 
 INCONVENIENCE OF BARTER ILLUSTRATED. 
 
 We can conceive a civilized community without a medium of exchange, 
 »nd trace a few of the inconveniences and difficulties that would attend 
 the exchange of commodities by barter. Suppose a farmer wanted a pair 
 of boots ; he would apply to a shoemaker to exchange wheat for boots. 
 The shoemaker may be supplied with wheat enough to meet, at least, his 
 immediate wants, but he may want a stove. Tiie farmer would have to 
 iind out a stove manufacturer, who may not want wheat, but may want a 
 coat. The farmer nmst next seek out n tailor, who in his turn may not 
 want wheat, but may require a hat. The farmer must still seek out a 
 hatter, who may happen to recjuire wheat to exchange with he miller for 
 flour. The farmer, who in this roundabout way having succeeded in find- 
 ing a customer for his wheat, would find that his troubles w<;re far from 
 ended. He and the hatter must ag'ee on how much wheat was wo th a 
 hat ; and having done so, the .selected hat may not be of the kind or size 
 which the tailor wanted. Assuming that he took that precaution, the 
 tailor may have no coat of the exact value of the hat ; and even supposing 
 that he had, it may not be the one that would either suit or i>lea.se the 
 stove manufacturer, who, again, may have no stove of the value of the 
 
16 
 
 d on, though 
 ilized society 
 o the lowest 
 eduction con- 
 led on. The 
 ped if money 
 of commerce 
 :he ditlerence 
 ckless forest. 
 
 'ION. 
 
 t* his problem, 
 farmer has a 
 ion of 1,?00 
 
 his capital, 
 notion. If I 
 r, why do I 
 )st ten days' 
 je is the only 
 
 devotes his 
 e any other 
 consumption, 
 obtained by 
 )f aome o'lher 
 hoes or coats 
 ar the hatter 
 at form. 
 
 of exchange, 
 voulJ attend 
 v^anted a [)air 
 at for boots. 
 
 it least, his 
 3uld have to 
 
 may want a 
 ;urn may not 
 1 seek out a 
 he miller for 
 eded in tind- 
 vcio far from 
 was wo th a 
 ■ kind or size 
 Bcaution, the 
 en supposing 
 ir please the 
 value of the 
 
 coa^, and at the same time of the value of the boots. Nor would this be 
 
 all. Every time that an exchange took place new values would have to 
 
 be agreed on. Tlie difficulties of barter would be so iuhurmountable that 
 
 civilization could make but little progress, everyone would be driven to 
 
 produce necessaries, and division of labor or complex co-operation could 
 
 scarcely exist ; and even such exchange as would take place would be 
 
 carried on in some sort of a money of account, as is practised amongst 
 
 ^ many savage triljes. Amongst customs of this kind, one prevalent amongst 
 
 I some tribee of our northern Indians in their dealings with the Hudson 
 
 |l)ay Company is peculiar. They count all their transactions in Martens. 
 
 I Every article is worth a certain number oi' martens, A blanket is worth 
 
 height or ten martens ; a pound of tobacco, two martens ; a yard of cotton, 
 
 lone marten ; a (Uy's lalVor, one marten ; and so on. The Company, in 
 
 ^converting this trathc into currency, value the marten at half a crown, or 
 
 lis. 6d. sterling (G2 cents). 
 
 IN LOANS CAPITAL TRANSFERRED. 
 
 When producers borrow, it is not money but capital they borrow ; 
 [and even when a debtor only wants money to satisfy a debt, it is capital 
 jthatis really borrowed, for the money carries with it its purchasing power. 
 
 THE LATE DEPRESSION. — ITS CONSEQUENCES. 
 
 Mr. Wallace entirely mistakes the cause and origin of the depression 
 'through which this country i)assed from 1873 to 1879, or I should rather 
 I have said, it is impossible for him ever to comprehend such phenomena 
 until he gets rid of his infantile notions of money and commerce. The 
 period from 1868 to 1873 is often, but very impi-operly, called a time of 
 .great prosperity in Canada. A glance at the obverse or dark side will give 
 a more accurate view of the true state of the social picture, oii which >'ill 
 b(.' seen unusual extravagance, rare im|)rovidence and wholesale burrowing. 
 These, I take it, are not usually taken to be the best criteria of prosperity. 
 About this time, owing, probably, to the change in our political institutions, 
 the public mind became unsettled, not unlikely expanding with our increase 
 ;o£ i)opulation and extension of territory. It is worthy of remark that in 
 framing our constitution we set out with the dangerous precedent of 
 bribing the extremities of the confederacy in joining the trunk, and that in 
 all subsequent attempts at extension this jjrecedent has loomed up like the 
 ghost in the play. Our eyi)erience in constitution mongeriug has also con- 
 firmed the well-known physical phcniouienon that the extremities of the 
 <;0nfederacy, like those of living organisms, rer,uire more care and the 
 txpenditure of more vital forces to keep them in a state of healthful 
 Lyarmth, than do the central and life-sustaining members. 
 
 iThe Federal (roveiinnent eml)ark('(l in schemes of great magnitude, 
 nvolving a verv large expenditure. Tlie grand era was undf^r the terms 
 n)i the confederation inaugurated by the construction of the Intercolonial 
 'Kailway ; and one eminent public man, now no more, said that he would 
 build six Intercolonials if the success of the scheme demanded so great a 
 
' t 
 
 16 
 
 sacrifice. He must have had a ))io|)hetic vision of the C. P. R. The 
 grand era was «ub8e((nently extended to the enlargement of the canals, to 
 the acquisition and the settlement of the North-West Territory, cul- 
 minating under further extension of the confederacy iu the still more 
 gigantic scheme of the Canadian Pacific Railway. 
 
 Nor did the grand era exhaust itself with these great efforts. It had 
 an eye in every direction for magnificence and extravagance on a great 
 scale. The buildings in which was conducted the outside civil service 
 were not in keeping with our enlarged ideas, so they must be pulled down, 
 and more commodious and elegant l)uildings occuj)y their places. So we 
 got new post ottices, new custom houses, etc. Nor were the vagabond 
 classes forgotten. Tlier too must have increased elegance and accomoda- 
 tion ill stately penitentiaries. 
 
 The Provincial magnates were not slow in catching the contagion. 
 They too embarked in hchemes, which were just as much beyond their 
 means or their necessities us the lai-ger ones of their prototyjjes. Railways 
 and other pul)lic works were largely aided or entirely constructed from the 
 provincial ext;lie(|uers Prisons and asylums were built on a scale of mag- 
 nificence and folly hitherto unknown. As might have been expected, the 
 contagion spread from the provincial governments to the nmnicipal councils. 
 The old town halls were poor and inconvenient; and wx>re soon replaced by 
 elegant and comiui'dious stiuctures, fitted up with all modern improve- 
 ments, so that nmniciiKil ottioials may wallow in luxuriousness. From the 
 municipal bodirs there was but a short step to the multitude. This step, 
 though short, engulfed the wlioU^ population in the vortex of extravagance, 
 fretting and foaming in a cauldron kept boiling by the fruits of borrowing. 
 
 The farmer no longer was satisfied with the old homestead, its j)lain 
 decorations ;. id homely fnrnisliiugs, noi' with the common spring-waggon 
 turned out by the village artizan, m which " Pliillis dear" rode to church 
 in days less ostentatious. Y\e must foisooth have a superl) mansion, with 
 surroundings a'sthetic enough to satisfy the cravings of an Oscar Wilde. 
 Elegantly polishiHl black walnut furniture, a Hteinvvay grand, and cor- 
 responding internal fittings, with a " top buj;gy " and fine equipag.i fit for 
 a " laird," suit the scale of his exalted aspirations. Following the plough 
 has become a degredation. His "boys" must adopt the learned [)rofessions, 
 «iud i)roductive labor must be consigned to menial hands 
 
 Nor did that staid, sober, educated class, the clergy, escape the epi- 
 demic. They too got dissatisfied with the old church, its fittings, its 
 ornamentation. It looked mean and shabby beside the elegant mansions 
 of the worshii)pers who weekly trod its aisles. Taking in the whole sit- 
 uation they concluded that the Lord was entitled to a share in the general 
 borrowing grab. There is not in this or any other city in the Dominion a 
 fashionable church I'earing its lofty dome and tapering spire to Heaven 
 but has deprived from fifty to one hundred laborers of the means of per- 
 manent subsistence. The Lord be praised ! Does this require proof I 
 Then here it is. Let the " fashionable " church have cost $50,000, while 
 
R. Tho- 
 le cAnals, to 
 I'ritory, cul- 
 Htill move 
 
 'ts. It had 
 on a great 
 jivil sei'vice 
 )ullecl down, 
 ices. So we 
 i<; vagaVjond 
 Id accomcda- 
 
 le contagion, 
 beyond their 
 s. Railways 
 cted from the 
 scale of mag- 
 expected, the 
 cipal council*!, 
 m rei»laced l»y 
 lei-n improve- 
 Hs. From the 
 i. This step, 
 extravagance, 
 i of borrowing. 
 
 stead, its plain 
 spring-waggon 
 ode to church 
 mansion, with 
 \ Oscar Wilde. 
 'n7id, and cor- 
 iquipagrf tit for 
 ng the plough 
 led professions, 
 
 escape the epi- 
 its fittings, its 
 gant mansions 
 I the whole sit- 
 I in the general 
 he Dominion a 
 aire to Heaven 
 means of per- 
 require proot t 
 $50,000, while 
 
 I 
 
 ■'!■. 
 
 a church worth $10,000 would answer all the purposes of the congregation. 
 Here then are $40,000 unproductively consumed. $40,000 would employ 
 for a year 100 laborere at $400 each, so that the laboring classes ure not 
 only deprived of $40,000, but they are deprived also of the annual profits 
 on $40,000 productively employed, which in a few years would exceed the 
 principal. By every such diversion of capital from productive purposes the 
 working classes are the great, the chief sufferei's. In these times labor wa» 
 relegated to menials or production had to cease. It became a popular 
 axiom that so long as people could live on borrowing it was folly ti work. 
 
 It is computed that the collective indebtedness of the community, 
 private, municipal, provincial and federal, in these six years was increased 
 l)y the enormous and almost incredible sum of SI, 000,000, 000 being nearly 
 $250 per capita of our present population. It is estimated that the farmer» 
 and other borrowers on mortgage security of Ontario alone borrowed no 
 less a sum than five hundred million dollars, the interest of which at 8 per 
 cent, amounts to forty million dollars a year. With such demands on the 
 loan market, it is not surprising that even such good security as farm 
 ju'operty realized so high a rate of interest. All these improvements 
 would be highly commendable if made from savings, but most reprehen- 
 sible when etiected by borrowing. 
 
 Under this retjime a farmer, say, borrowed $10,000 at 8 per cent. ])er 
 annum. With $8,000 of this he l)uilt a residence, suitably furnished, and 
 j)rovided new eijuipage. There was left S2,000 for expending on the farm, 
 in fencing, draining, improved iniplemcnts and stock. It will be observed 
 that four-tifths of the loan has been spent unpioductivelv, and only one-tifth 
 productively. The interest of $ 1 0,000 at 8 |.er cent, is $800. But $8,000 
 having been spent unproductively yields nothing, tht?refore $2,000 
 which was spent productively nmst yield all the int(^rest ($800) which i» 
 40 per cent., so that in reality the capital productively invested is paying 
 not 8 but 40 per cent. It would be a strong camel's back that could bear 
 the tension of that load. There are numerous cases in which the whole 
 loan was unproductively consumed. 
 
 By the introduction ot so large an amount of capital distributed as wages 
 and in the i)urchase of materials, the currency was inflated, commodities of 
 all kinds, labor included, rose enoi-niously in price, importation was stim- 
 ulated to a degree hitherto unknown, while exportation almost ceased, and a 
 tit of reckless speculation seized the whole mercantile comnnmity. So long as 
 borrowing could l>e r(!sortetl to things went on swimmingly. But lx)rrowing, 
 like other human devices, must stop some time. When the lenders cried 
 " Halt !" the farmer began to realize his 40 per cent, interest. He cried 
 ruin and decay, surrendered " tlie beast for the damage," and many fled to 
 Manitoba and the neighboring Republic. A commercial depression simul- 
 taneously occurring in England and the United Stat(is aggravated the re- 
 vulsion here. Thes" coxmtries are our chief customers for lumber, our 
 staple export. Their, and our own difficulties, stopped the home and 
 foreign consumption of that article, pai-alysing that important industry. 
 
; 
 
 
 :i l 
 
 18 
 
 with millions of capital locked up in the shape of nnsaleahle lumber in our 
 mill yards, covos ami booms. These are the principal causes, and not 
 scarcity of money, wliich ltd to the commercial crisis of 1874-79. 
 
 rUEDIT. 
 
 "Scarce money lias begotten credit and usury, the two monsters, one of 
 ^'hich creates debt, which demoralizes and destroys a man, and the other eata up 
 his subsistence." 
 
 Credit means trust or confidence, i. e., in commercial parlance, the 
 confidence which A has in B, if he, A, lends IJ his capital or any part of 
 it, that B will return it to him at some stipulated time, with generally 
 some compensation for the ua^ of it. Now, in tlu; name of common sense, 
 what has such a transaction as this to do with the abundance or scarcity 
 of money 'I I ask for credit from a grocer. Why 'i Either because I 
 liave no cinital or not enough for my purpose, whether that purpose be 
 personal consumption, ])rodnctiou or commercial enterprise. Money 
 might be as jdentiful as autumnal leaves in Vallambrosa, but evidently 1 
 had nrit the wherewith to purchase it. So that it is an entire mistake to 
 suppose that credit or usury has anything to do with the ({uantity of 
 money in the hands of the comnmnity. In mercantile countries there is 
 a class of persons possessed of capitil who want either the ability or incli- 
 nation to employ it themselves. These is another class of persons without 
 capital, but with the training and kixowledge that would enable them to 
 employ capital advantageously if they had it. These two classes come 
 together a' id agree to a transference by which this ca[)ital laying idle is 
 productivf iy employed. But those who part with their capital not only 
 recjuire sci.ie guarantee that it will be returned to them at a stipulated 
 time, but also some compensation for its use, and for the risk which they 
 run in i)artiug with it. And no wonder, for it is well known that it 
 sometimes never returns to the owner. If no inducement was held out to 
 the owner of the capital, it is obvious that he would not part with it, for 
 he would be not only leaving himself no better off, but far 
 
 ]>y so doing 
 
 worse ; he would be incurring the risk of its total 
 
 r 
 
 loss. 
 
 
 CAl'ITAL, NOT CREDIT, CAIUIIES ON INDUSTRIES. 
 
 " Scarcity of money has begotten credit in this way, that there not beinj* 
 enous;h money to carry on the business of tlie country, credit takes its place, and 
 the expansion of credit carries on the industries of a country for a while, until, 
 perhaps, some man overstrains his credit and fails." 
 
 No industry can be carried on by any exf)edient but labor and capital ; 
 and the industries of every country are limited by these factors. All 
 credit does, or can do, is to transfer caj ital from one hand to anothttr; 
 and generally from hands unlit or unwilling to employ it to hands more 
 «8fhcient, by which means the wealth of the community is augmented. 
 
 CREDIT THE CAUSE OF PANICS. 
 
 -<( 
 
 I believe that a scarce, fluctuating money is the cause of panic." 
 
19 
 
 mber in our 
 ics, and not 
 
 liters, one of 
 uth'ii' eats up 
 
 pa»'lance, the 
 • any part of 
 th generally 
 oinnion sense, 
 ice or scarcity 
 ler because I 
 at purpose be 
 prise. Money 
 ut evidently 1 
 tire mistake to 
 he (luantity of 
 intries there is 
 ability or incli- 
 lersons without 
 snable them to 
 vo classes come 
 ill laying idle is 
 lapital not only 
 1 at a stipulated 
 risk wliich they 
 known that it 
 ; was held out to 
 part with it, for 
 ^tter oti; but far 
 
 The cause of a commercial panic is a great contraction of credit 
 rimmediately following its inordinate expansion, when a gambling tit of 
 speculation has seized the mercantile community ; or it is, in other words, 
 a complete loss of contidence by the poseeHSors of cajiital in those who 
 desire to borrow ; and the remedy is not increase of money, but incrtaso of 
 confidence. 
 
 INTKUKST — ITS CAUSE. 
 
 "Scarcity of money begets usurj." 
 
 Interest or usury is the compenstt'''"ion required by the owner of capital 
 for lending or giving the use of it to anothar ])er8on. Its rate depends on 
 i-<leman1 and supply. When the >imount required by the Itorrowing class 
 is less thin the amount in the hands of the lending class seeking invest- 
 inent, the competition of the lenders will reduce the rate of interest. 
 When, on the contrary, the amount required by ihti l)orrowers exceeds 
 that seiiking to be lent, the competition of the borrowing class will raise 
 the rate of interest. 
 
 LKNDINli CAPITAL AT INTEREST AS T.ECJITIMATE AND USEFUL AS 
 
 OTIIEK t ALLINC. 
 
 ANY 
 
 IF.S. 
 
 it there not being 
 takes its place, an<l 
 f for a while, until, 
 
 labor and capital ; 
 tiese factors. All 
 hand to ai.oth(!r; 
 f it to hands moro 
 is augmented. 
 
 )f panic." 
 
 " No man can deny that usury is to-day eating up more of the profits of the 
 Ijtroducer than anything else, and what does it do ? It only keeps a lot of men 
 ^'lliving in idleness, who produce nothing, but eat the subsistence of those who 
 Rework." 
 
 f The owner of lent capital is no more amenable to this communistic 
 '|charge than is he who, instead of lending, employs it himself in pro- 
 ?fluctive industry. For if borrowed for that purpose, it is quite immaterial 
 ^o the community whether A the possessor of 1,000 bushels of wheat, 
 %mploys it himself in feeding laborers and providing their necessaries, or 
 
 t'^ends it to B for a like purpose : only with this difference, that B is likely 
 3 employ it more ethciently, which is an advantage to the whole commu- 
 ity. Indeed, the caj)ilalist who will neither employ his capital himself 
 ;|ior lend it to another for that purpose is a far greater enemy to the people 
 ^t large, and to the working classes particularly, than is he who even 
 lends it at the most exorbitant rate of intenist that was ever dreamt of, 
 
 the miser who hoards is the worst enemy of the i)eople ; the miser who 
 inds is the benefactor of the working classes. For the lending or transfer 
 |f capital sets industries in motion, tind gives eni[)Ioymeut to labor, which 
 iherwise could not be carried on for want of means. It is capital that 
 always lent. When a manufacturer of shoes, for example, borrows ; it is 
 jot money, but leather and other materials and instruments and food and 
 
 fjcessaries for his workmen, that he borrows, for these are the only things 
 hich he requires to carry on his business with 
 
 ^ CONVERTIBLE CIRRENCV IS NEVER SCARCE. 
 
 M " Scarce money is always dear money, and every man knows whenever 
 fijloney is dear everything else becomes cheap." 
 
f 
 
 20 
 
 There ig no doubt but the price or money value of oommoditiei; 
 dependa on the quantity ot money in circulation or offered for sale in tho j 
 purchase of these commoditieH combined with the rapidity of the c'rcula- , 
 tion. If the currency is convertible, and that the value of the precioUH , 
 metals has in the slightest perceptible degree increased in this country, 
 the gold and silver of the mercantile world will be attracted hither for < 
 investment, because it will be profital)lo to do ho ; and this will continue < 
 to |)our in until this currency becomes of the like value with other countries. ^ 
 Just in the same manner as if Hour was higher here than in the Uhited 
 States, the flour of that country would pour in here until prices are equalised, 
 cost of carriage excepted. 
 
 WA0K8 IN KIND IMPORTANT TO THE LAHORER. * 
 
 "We have had an illustration of this in this country during the last four or 
 five yeai-s. Money was scarce and labor was low and the country was in a j 
 depressed condition," 
 
 I have explained above the jdienomenon through wi)ich this country 
 pasced during the depression, to which may be added an unusually large 
 share of tlie circulating capital of the country was converted into fixd 
 capital. This circulating capital is the wage-fund, and by whatever 
 amount reduced, by so nuich is the fund for ths sustenance of labor dimiii- 
 ished and the means of the laborers curtailed. In consequence of this 
 nsduction, the laborer and his family are unable to Hve uj> to their usual 
 standard of comfort, and each laborer's competition for a share of tlit 
 reduced fund adds to the depressed condition of the lowest strata, who an 
 often reduced to tho very verge of starvation. In illustration, suppos- 
 the circulating capital of this country, in its normal condition, i 
 $200,000,000, divided amongst 500,000 laborers, giving an average t 
 each of $400. If this fund, by tho conversion of a portion of it into fixe 
 capital, as railways, buildings, etc., is reduced to $150,000,000, while th 
 number of laborers remains the same, the average share of each laborer : 
 reduced from $400 to $300 a year. 
 
 But this has nothing to do with the anioimt of money in the counlr 
 or in existence. During the depression there was the same facility ther 
 is now for acquiring money, if there was any way of using it. The quantity ( 
 money in circulation has no efi'ect on wages. The wages of the labon 
 is the share which he receives of the product of his labor. This and nothii 
 else constitutes his remuneration. If a farm laborer gets a bushel < 
 wheat or other equivalent of farm produce, which is the only thing wlii( 
 the farmer can give him, for a day's labor, whether the bushel of wheat 
 worth one or two dollars matters not to the laborer, if the price is i 
 iluenced by the quantity of money in circulation, for all other commoditi 
 ■will be affected similarly. For example, if the quantity of the circulatii 
 medium seeking investment in the market of commodities were sudden 
 reduced one-half ; the price or money value of all things would fall oi : 
 half, — in other words, the bushel of wheat which sold yesterday for ' 
 would sell to-day for $1 ; the lb, of tea which sold yesterday for ■. 
 
 
31 
 
 If oommoditiei^ 
 
 [for sale in the 
 
 of the c'rcula- 
 
 )f the precioutj 
 
 this country, 
 
 3ted hither for 
 
 18 will continue 
 
 J other countrieK. 
 
 In in the Uhited 
 
 bes are equal iHed, 
 
 ig the last four or 
 country was in a 
 
 liich this country 
 
 I unusually lavgf 
 
 ertfd into fixed 
 
 unci by whatever 
 
 ce of labor dimiii 
 
 nsequence of th^ 
 
 ^ up to their usual 
 
 »r a share of tin 
 
 est strata, who an 
 
 ustration, suppos 
 
 mal condition, i 
 
 ing an average t 
 
 ion of it into fixe 
 
 ,000,000, while tli 
 
 3 of each laborer i 
 
 uey in the countr 
 same facility ther 
 it. The quantity ( 
 vages of the labon 
 r. This and nothit 
 ;r gets a bushel * 
 le only thing wlm 
 3 bushel of wheat 
 , if the price is i 
 1 other commoditi 
 ty of the circulatii 
 lities were suddon 
 ings would fall or. 
 Id yesterday for ; 
 \ yesterday for t 
 
 irould sell to-day for 60 cents ; the coat which yesterday sold for $10 
 
 rould sell today for $5 ; the day's labor which sold yesterday for ^2 would 
 
 Bell today for .^l, unless under contract. It is, however, manifest that 
 
 [the dollar of to-day for the purchase ur transfer of commodities is as efficient 
 
 |«H the $2 of yesterday, and that nothing but ukuney has changed its 
 
 lvalue ; and that beyond existing contracts and fixed money payments no 
 
 [one is artected by the change except miners in gold and silver, who now 
 
 Kge.i a double (|uantity of all uther commodities in exchange for the only ones 
 
 .{•which they produce, and, therefore, have tj sell. 
 
 r' 
 
 MAN MAKKS HIS LIVIN<i IIY HIS LAHOR OR CAPITAL, 
 f 
 
 '' Money ianuw abundant and cheap, and men must ein])luy their money to 
 :;get allying." 
 
 j It is not money that men employ to g<;t a living. The capitalist em- 
 
 })loy8 his capital and his labor too, if lie superintends the business, to get 
 lis liviii" . I'd the workman employs his labor for a like purpose. 
 
 I'KOIM-K MANUFACTUHK MOIIK TO BIY MORK. 
 
 " The National Policy and ihe conipelliiiy of the people to maiiufacture more 
 ifand buy less, was one of ihe causes ; but one of the principal causes is the iu- 
 ,| -creased (piantity of money in circulation." 
 
 ^ People do not inamifacture more to buy less. Is not the effect the 
 
 '.^ veiy contrary ? The more you produce the more you can purchase. Every 
 fi increase of production augments the puichasing power of the society. 
 
 V 
 
 I I'MOTKCTION. — SOMK OF ITS CONSKyl'KNCES. 
 
 i' If a country has an advantage in the jirorluction of any one article 
 
 .':forniing the staple of the necessarit's of the people, if that country directed 
 Jits whole ca|)ital to the production of that oiieai-ticle, it could purchase more 
 
 jeofail other things than if its capital were diverted into a thousand difi'erent 
 ]-clmnnels. To illustrate this, I will suppose that the normal condition of 
 
 ^Canada as resfpects soil, climate and means of communication, the skill, 
 
 ■|<lexterity and industry of her inhabitants, or the efficiency of her labor, are 
 i«uch that it was indifferent to her whether she produced all her require- 
 S«nent8 directly, or only prod\iced some, with the surplus of which she sup- 
 |plied the rest through the double process of exjjortation and importation. 
 TXJnder these circumstances, I will suppose she gives a preference to pro- 
 Iducing all within herself, and, us it is called, " promote her industries." 
 I'onsequently she could neither export nor import. I will further suppose 
 llhat tho cai ital invested in all her industries, reckoned in money, is 
 1$ 100,000,000, of which one-half, or $lf)O,00t),00O, is invested in agriculture, 
 md the rest in manufacttu-es, and that the expectations of profit in all 
 I'occupations are 10 i>er cent. We will further suppose that the agricultural 
 jclass, after supplying their own wants had §25,0(10,000 of farm produce 
 to exchange with the mauufactuiers for manufactured commodities 
 
 ,^l Suppose now that while the soil of all other countries retained its 
 
 tjiormal fertility, that of Canada, say, by a miracle, is doubled, so that the 
 
i 
 
 j 
 
 ) 
 
 
 !. 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 ) 
 
 
 I 
 
 22 
 
 labor which formerly produced one bushel of wheat now produces two_ 
 This increased fertility gives Canada a groat advantage over all other 
 countries in the production of all kinds of farm pi'oduce, and the advantage 
 not being common to other occupations, she can keep to herself the whole 
 benefit, just as a i)atentee can engross the whole profits of his invention. 
 For the price of food will still continue to be regulated by the cost on the 
 least fertile lands, which the demands of the population require to be cul- 
 tivated. By the change the capital of $i)0,00(),000 invested in agriculture 
 v/ill be doubled, and the profits of the agricultural class will also be doubled 
 while the whole wealth of tiie society would be at once increased 
 from §10«,OUO,000 to )? 150,000,000, assuming no change to have 
 tak*^n place in manufactuiing pursuits. How will the change affect the 
 manufactuiing class I They will one and all be driven from their employ- 
 ments. This will be brought al)out in two ways. 1st. The agricultural 
 class will now have not .'^l^S.OOO.OOO, but .S7r),()"(;0,000 worth of farm pro- 
 duce to exchange for manufactured commodities, of which 825,000,000 will 
 he required, as before, to feed the manufacturing classes. ]>ut will the 
 farming class consent to continue to feed them wt'll on the old terms ( 
 Most assuredly not, for if they did they would he foregoing a legitimate 
 profit on the $2."), 000,000 worth of produce which was devoted to that pur- 
 ])Ose, as is evidf-nt from the following cousidci'atiori.-i : — The oreadstufts of 
 ('anada being ))roduced at ha'^ the cost of that of other countries, the people 
 will get all their imports at iiuii'-price, for the cost of the imports to the 
 importers is not the cost of ju'oductiou of the imported article, but the cost 
 of production of the exported cnmuiodity with which they were juirchased. 
 Hence the agrici Itural class will not only have three times as much as 
 before to spend on manufactured necessaries and luxuries, but they will get 
 all their commodities for one-half what they formerly cost, so they will l)e 
 enriched six-fold, lint if they traded with the houie manufacturers on the 
 old terms they would be losing a cousid"rable share, exactly one third, of 
 this advantage. It is plain that they will not do so, and conse(juently as 
 the manufact'.ners must by some means [)rocure their usual food, they will 
 be driven by the comj.etition of the importers to sell their commodities for 
 one half of the old ])rice. Here we have an illustration of that great 
 grievance, the so-called " slaughter market," about which so many crocodile 
 tears ha^■e been shed. '2nd. Another reason why nuuiufacturing would be 
 abandoned is: Capital is always flowing towards those employments which 
 promise the greatest expectations of proHt. The manufacturing capitalist 
 would not content himself with 10 per cent, profit while ihe agriculturist 
 was making: 20 per cent. Therefore he, wohld withdraw his capital from 
 the less to the more profitable employments, even if the underselling pro- 
 cess did not operate at all. It is obvious that it would be in the interest 
 of the whole community that this transfer of capital shou' I take place. 
 For with the whole capital transferred to agriculture, the wealth of the 
 country, would amount to .^200,000, 000, with a profit of 20 per cent., 
 while if manufacturing was continued, the entire wealth would be only 
 $150,000,000, with a profit of 20 per cent, on $100,000,000, and only 10 
 
 ■i:i 
 
 M 
 
33 
 
 Iduces two, 
 all other 
 h advantage 
 If the whole 
 invention, 
 cost on the 
 le to be cul- 
 aarriculture 
 be (louble'l 
 ;e increased 
 ;e to have 
 Ige affect the 
 [leir employ- 
 agricultural 
 of tHrni pro- 
 000,000 will 
 But will the 
 old teims t 
 a legitimate 
 to that pur- 
 readstuffs oi 
 es, the people 
 r.ports to the 
 , but the cost 
 re ])urcliased. 
 ■i as much as 
 : they will get 
 3 they will be 
 cturers on the 
 one third, of 
 nseijuently as 
 bod, they will 
 mmodities for 
 of that great 
 iiany crocodile 
 iring would be 
 yments which 
 ring capitalist 
 s agriculturist 
 s capital from 
 tlerselling pro- 
 in the interest 
 Id take place, 
 wealth of the 
 20 per cent., 
 vould be only 
 0, and only 10 
 
 
 
 per cent, on $50,000,000 ; or in other words the society would be poorex' 
 by $50,000,000 capital, and the profit of 10 per cent, on $100,000,000. 
 
 Suppose now that the mdnufacturers, instead of abandoning their 
 pui suits, appealed to the Legislature for piotection to their industries on 
 any one of the numerous jjatriotic and philanthropic " stock-in-trade " 
 pleas of the advocates of restrictions on importation ; and that the Legis 
 lature favorably entertained their petition, it is pertinent to in([uire what 
 amount of protection would enable them to compete with for'ugn goods ( 
 The purchasing power of the agricultural class over anil above their share 
 of farm produce foi- their own food has been sliown above to hv. equal to 
 S75,O00,000. If a tax of 100 per cent, is laid on that it reduces their pur- 
 chasing power to $37,500,000. Jiut before the increased fertility their pur- 
 chasing power was only $25,000,000, so that notwithstanding this enormous 
 tax they are still l»etter off by $12,500,000 than before the change in tht^ soil ; 
 and therefore commodities will still continue to be iinpoi'ted. At a duty of 
 150 per cent, the agricultural class will, as to their purchasing power over 
 manufactured commodities, Ije in the same position as they were in i)efore 
 the change of fertility, bat it will ho. still their interest to iuiport ; and 
 they will contimie to import, on account of their increased profits, until 
 the duty exceeds 200 per cent., after which the home nroducers vvill have 
 a monopoly of the home market. Mark the conse(iuenees. For.'ign good* 
 having been driven out of the mai'ket, importation must cease and with it 
 exportation. For the foreign customer cannot jjurchase our produce if we 
 refuse his ; there can be no exchange, he having nothing else to gi\e us 
 for our Hour or I)eef but his cloth or liurdwaie. Owing to the increased 
 fertility one-half of the land must go out of cultivation ; and one-half of 
 the agricultural ])Opulation and capital must go too, and find a refuge in 
 the only employnuait left them — manufacturing, unless the capital and 
 population migrate to some other j)lace more congei'ial to their pursuits. 
 The latter alternative would be the worst of calamities that could befall the 
 society. Assuming no emigration from the country of either labor or capital, 
 Chi-ee-foiu'ths of the capital would 1)e invested in manufactures, and only 
 one fourth in agriculture. But the profits of the agriculturists Inung still 
 20 per cent., while that of the manufacturers was only 10 ])er cent, 
 capital would still flow in until profits weie reduced to a common level. 
 8o that by the imposition of the tax the society would again Ite reduced 
 to its original condition : and the beneficent designs of I'rovidence frus- 
 trated by the perversity of an ignorant Legislature. 
 
 It will be argued that the competition of the manufacturers them- 
 selves will bring down prices and reduce profits. The manufacturers will 
 not be content with a less profit than other capitalists ; and no amount of 
 competition will reduce it below that, for rather than sul)mit to a diminu- 
 tion they would withdraw their capital from the underpaid industry, and 
 invest in some other way. 
 
 In whatever proportion a country has an advantage in the production 
 of any one commodity, by the imjwsition of a protective duty is that 
 advantage by so much annihilated, and the whole society impoverished. 
 
M • 
 
 |! ' 
 
 24 
 
 Suppose that instead of the fertility of the soil being miraculously 
 increased, its natural fertility was such that it gave an advantige in 
 any proportion over the soils of other countries in the production of agri- 
 cultural prodiicts, just in that proportion would it be the interest of 
 Canada to turn her capital to agricultuml production. For by so doing 
 the collective wealth of the community would be gi'eater ; and we would 
 obtain all other commodities, in which our advantage was less, cheaper, 
 and consequontly in greater abundance. In a free, unrestricted state of 
 trade, capital would flow from the less to the more profitable employment, 
 and the whole society would be better off. Suppose that our farmers, from 
 situation or fertility of soil, had such an advantage over their brethren of the 
 United States as would enable a Canadian farmer to lay down in Liver- 
 j)ool five barrels of flour for the same labor that it would take an American 
 farmer to lay down four barrels. The Canadian exporter would have an 
 advantage of 2.") per cent, over the American, or in other words, his profit 
 on every barrel of flour would exceed that of the American by 25 per 
 cent., and i e would get all his imports 25 per cent, less than the American 
 farmer, giving a total advantage over his rival in the same market of 50 
 per cent. If a tax on impoitaticn was laid on, the foreign commodity 
 would not bo driven from the home market until the tax exceeded 50 per 
 cent. Then exportation, and with it importation, would necessarily cease, 
 and the home manufact ^rer would be in complete possession of the home 
 market. This will be at the expense to all the rest of the community of 
 50 jier cent, additional cost. To say that the manufacturers will not profit 
 to the full extenc of their privileges, and that the increased duties hurt 
 nobody, is the merest rot. If so, why stop at 30, 40 or 50 per cent 1 
 "Why not nrike it 1,000 per cent, if it makes no difierence to the con- 
 sumers ? If there is any article of production in which we have an advan- 
 tage over other countries, that commodity needs not protection, and it is 
 the one to which all our labor and capital .should be directed, and to which 
 it Hould spontaneously gravitate in a state of freedom. 
 
 Suppose, now, that Canada has not an ar'vantage over any one coun- 
 try in any aiticle of production, but that her disadvantages are in different 
 degrees. It will, nevertheless, be to her interest to cultivate those indus- 
 tries in which her disadvantages are least, by which the efficiency of her 
 labor will be the greatest, by which she shall have all her other produc- 
 tions at the least expenso of labor and capital, and therefore have the 
 gieatest amount of them, or in other words, she will be we.\lthier than if 
 |)roducing the most disadvantageous kinds, either freely or by protection. 
 
 THE NATIONAL POLICY'S DOINGS. 
 
 What, may I ask, has the National Policy done? What has been its 
 social tffect? Its advocates claim that it has brought on good times, made 
 work abundant, that prices of all conunodities are high and trade booming. 
 The evidences of reviving prospei ity are not far to seek, they are visible on all 
 sides. One of them, however, is not hiyli prices. But to claim that these 
 signs of improvement are due to the National Policy is all moonshine. In 
 
 u. 
 
25 
 
 liraculouslj 
 Ivantige in 
 ion of agri- 
 interest of 
 by so doing 
 d we would 
 !S8, cheaper, 
 •ed state of 
 mployment, 
 ivmors, from 
 ithrenofthe 
 1 in Liver- 
 n American 
 Id have an 
 Is, his profit 
 by 25 per 
 le American 
 arket of 50 
 commodity 
 •eded 50 peV 
 sarily cease, 
 >f the home 
 mm unity of 
 ill not profit 
 duties hurt 
 5 per cent ? 
 to the con- 
 •'ean advan- 
 II, and it is 
 nd to which 
 
 y one coiin- 
 in different 
 :h0se indus- 
 mcy of her 
 ier jjrodue- 
 e liave the 
 lier than if 
 protection. 
 
 as been its 
 imes, made 
 e booming, 
 siblc on all 
 that these 
 shine. In 
 
 ,^11 commercial countries revivals and depressions of trade follow one another 
 
 rith. the certaintly and almost the regularity with which day succeeds night, 
 
 )r ebb succeeds flow. Is it to the National Policy that we owe the increased 
 
 jrosperity of the lumber trade, our most important, our staple industry ? Is 
 
 lit not rather to the increased demand in England and the United States '? 
 
 fly it tf) the National Policy the farmer owes the good crops of the last three 
 
 • or four years'? Is it to the National Policy that he owes the increasd price of 
 
 flour and beef, or to the demand in the English market^ Is it to the National 
 
 gPolicy that the agriculturist owes the high price of potatoes and other root 
 
 i-crops, eggs, butter, etc., or to a scant crop and brisk demand in the United 
 
 ^ J^tates ? But to the National Policy is fairly due the increase to the work- 
 
 3"ing and farming classes of such absolute necessaries of life as light, fuel, 
 
 "iclothing, sugar, furniture, implements of husbandry and the tools of 
 
 artizans. In the working class I include farm labort-is, mechanics of all 
 
 kinds, miners, fishermen, navvies, professional men, and all others who 
 
 ; •earn their subsistence by the labors of head and hands. 
 
 Every farmer knows that with an abundant harvest, here and a scant 
 V one in Europe, raising wheat from a virgin soil is one of the most profitable 
 of industries. Every workingman knows that activity in lumbering and 
 farming is the best guarantee of steady and remunerative employment. 
 The success of these industries stinmlates all other improvements. a.s rail- 
 roads, buildings, etc., which enlarge the demand for labor for mechaniea 
 and merchants. The revival of these staple industries is quite sufficient, 
 now as of yore, to account for the increased prosperity visible all round. 
 Nor is there any room for the share of the National Policy in the revival, nor 
 ■any necessity for inventing any such contrivances. But to the National 
 Policy is fairly due the increase to the working, farming, and other classes 
 outside the protected manufacturers, in the cost of such prime necessaries of 
 life as fuel, light, clothing, bedding, sugar, furniture, implements of 
 husbandry and the tools of artizans. 
 
 Is nothing then due to the National Policv in the general revival of 
 trade 1 In so far as that policy has been instrumental in the introduction 
 of foreign capital for permanent investment in this country, which other- 
 wise would not come, by so much h s its results been beneficial ; and this 
 is all the advantage that can fairly be claimed for it. 
 
 When the advocate of ])rotection is /lors de combat in argument, he 
 l)oints to the greatness of England as a signal result of protection. He 
 takes care, in this appeal to sentiment, to exhibit only the sunny side of 
 the shield. He carefully ignores the dark side. He omits all mention of 
 the gaunt poverty, the brooding despair, the squalid misery which trace its 
 footprints on all sides, and made still more odious and intolerable by the 
 contrast with tlie immense wealth of the few. He keeps the poor-house, 
 the gin-shop, the garret and the prison out of sight. Is this a wholesome 
 example to follow 1 — 
 
 *" Where wealth accumulates and men decay." 
 It is in the abolition of protection that the best hope of English r&- 
 
I 
 
 •^ 
 
 it 
 
 26 
 
 to 
 
 generation lies, by which the evils which it has engendered may be eradicated 
 before the superstructure, raised on so treachei-ous a foundation, may topple 
 over, bringing chaos ia its tiain. 
 
 If protection in Canada should be followed by similar results as in 
 Britain, Canadians may well pray; — "From protection. Lord, deliver us." 
 
 The worst etTects of a protective policy is its tendency to mal^e the 
 rich richer and the poor poorer. Unequal distribution of wealth is the 
 great danger which threatens social institutions. It is the burning question 
 of the age. It is on the solution of this great economic problem depends 
 the success or failure of the existing social fabric. It is the duty of true 
 Conservatism, if it cannot remove, to temper the great inequalities be- 
 tween the extremes of societv, to soften those startling contrasts between 
 excessive luxury and squalid misery, which form so painful a feature of 
 modern civilization. If legislators are unable to grapple with this fcisk, 
 to tind a remedy for this gseat social scandal, then the system itself is 
 judged, and stands condenuied as a nuisance. 
 
 " THE SLAUGHTER MARKET." 
 
 A word on the "slaughter mai-ket " grievance. The interest of the 
 consumer is the public interest. The interest of the seller is always 
 antagonistic to that of the purehasei". The seller is invariably the pro- 
 ducer or distril)utor ; the purchaser is ultimately the consumer. When a 
 procbicer or dealer has a warehouse full of goods unsold, he is always 
 grumbling al)Out hard times and the scairity of money. But the secr(>t 
 burden of liis refrain is disajtpointuu'nt at the diminution of his jn-ohts. 
 If a foreign conqietitor is underselling him, he cries ruin, but what really 
 occurs is that his profits are reduced, wliile his grief is cause of rejoicing 
 to the conniiunity collectively. For what does this teii"ible lUider-SfJlnig 
 ])rocess mean \ It means, when all is told, that a i)oor man can buy his 
 necessaries cheaper than the wealthy ca}>italists would wish he could get 
 them for. Suppose that the Americans, during the slaughter excitement, 
 sent over their goods here and distributed them gratuitously amongst the 
 people, would anyone call that an evil ] Would it not l>e the most muni- 
 licent generosity '] Well, supi)ose that instead of giving them for nothing, 
 that they gave them for one-half what similar commodities could be 
 obtained from the home dealers, is that an evil to be deploi-ed ! Is it not, 
 on tlie contrary, a great blessing, differing only in degree from the first 
 supposition ; and if there is one time more than another when this is a 
 blessing to the poorer classes it is in times of depression. Suppose, coming 
 on winter, that I want an overcoat, and that owing to commercial ditti- 
 culties my means of purchasing it has been considerably reduced, so that 
 if I am compelled to buy it from the home dealers I may go without or have 
 to^take a very infeiior article. Will any one pretend to say that it wouKl 
 not be a great boon to me to get a coat of good (puvlity of foreign manu- 
 facture for the same or less price than an inferior one of home growth 
 would cost me 1 I take it to have been in some respects a most fortunate thing 
 for this country, in its last commercial crisis, that accidentally a similar 
 
 ;:.tr| 
 
 in 
 
 ■a 
 
 I 
 
 >| an 
 
 i 
 
ly be eradicated 
 ion, may tojiple 
 
 r results as in 
 rd, deliver us.'" 
 to inalje the 
 wealth is the 
 iraing question 
 obleui dojK'uil.s 
 e duty of true 
 nequalities hv- 
 rasts between 
 1 a feature of 
 ■vith this tRisk, 
 stem itself is 
 
 nterest of the 
 ler is always 
 al)ly the pro- 
 ler. When a 
 he is always 
 ut the secret 
 his profits. 
 
 what really 
 
 of rejoicing 
 'iidfr-srJllng 
 can buy his 
 lie could "et 
 
 excitement, 
 amongst the 
 
 most miini- 
 for nothing, 
 fcs coidd be 
 Is it not, 
 )m the tirst 
 'n this is a 
 >ose, coming 
 lercial dis- 
 ced, so that 
 out or have 
 at it would 
 eign manu- 
 me growth 
 Linate thine- 
 y a similar 
 
 27 
 
 rouble existed amongst our neighbors, for we were enabled to get many 
 things which we would have had to have done without, if our neighbors' 
 lecessities had not compelled them to sell their goods at such low prices ; for, 
 Sin ordinary times, we could not purchase them at such rates ; and hj 
 ; whatever the cost exceeded the selling price, V)y so much was our wealth 
 5 increased or our wants better supplied than they otherwise would have been. 
 
 CREDIT THE CHIEF CAUSE OK PANICS. 
 
 "I hold that if there were no credit there could be no panics." 
 
 ■ Ther(> is no doubt but the state of credit, and not the state of the 
 
 '^currency, is one of the chief causes of commercial revulsions. Speculative 
 
 J trading, stimulated by great facilities for obtaining credit, undue confidence 
 
 by lenders, followed l)y a sudden curtailment of ci-edit, are prime factor 
 
 in the phenomenon. But the quantity of the circidating medium has n > 
 
 share in it. 
 
 THE LOSS THE DISSIPATION OF THE CAPITAL. 
 
 " A man might lose all he had in speculation, but his loss would not create 
 -| any disturbance. It would injure him, but the money would have ]>as.sed into 
 5 the pocket of some one else. There would be no loss of money to carry on busi- 
 ness with. But you take the failure of a man who is carrying,' on business at 
 ; <redit ; his faihire hurts someone else, and thus disturbs the tr?.de, and the dis- 
 turbance creates a panic." 
 
 The same confusion [ttrvades all Mr. Wallace's reasoning on this 
 important branch of political economy. He cannot distinguisli between 
 the extinction of capital and the ti'ansfer of the medium of exchange. 
 Suppose a cai)italist undertakes the eonstiMietion of some work of public 
 or private utility, and that after spending all his capital the work is aban- 
 doned in an unfinished state, like the celebrateil C/if(t>t Canal, does that 
 hurt nobody but the owner \ 
 
 The ciipital is dissipated, gone for ever, except whatever portion may 
 happen to be saved by the laborers who received it, or by the producers of 
 materials as profits. A person cannot both eat his cake and be able to 
 transfer it to another, 'riie capital lost in speculation, no matter whether 
 owned by the speculator himself or lent him by another, is gone, dissipated, 
 lost for evei'; and the loss of the community is the same, whether the dissi- 
 pated capital is owned by the spendthrift himself or borrowed. According 
 to Mr. Wallace's reasoning, the capital — as champagne, oystei-s, etc., con- 
 sumed at a vice-regal dinner — instead of being dissipattxl, would be only 
 transferred, and be so much added to the wealth of the community. From 
 this doctrine necessarily follows the coroUai'y : — The greattr the extrava- 
 ganee the greater the prosjierity. 
 
 EXCHANtiE MAY BE CARRIED ON BY CHEQUES. 
 
 It is easy to conceive a condition of society by which its industries 
 might be carried on without the intervention — nay, the existence — ot a 
 single coin or its representative paper. Suppose that we had one banking 
 
28 
 
 
 ':^'f.^;"i:r^^ 
 
 institution, say a Government department, with a branch in every city, 
 town, village and hamlet throughout the country, and that eaeh capitalist, 
 trader and laborer of the community had an account in it, and that all 
 })t.yments were made by cheques, there need be no money in existence as 
 far as that society was concerned, nor would the machinery for carrying it 
 out be either impracticable or cumbrous. There would be some devia- 
 tions from existing bank routine. For public convenience it would, like 
 the post office, have to be kept open from 7 a.nj. to 8 p.m. each day to 
 facilitate the convenience of work-people to do all their banking transac- 
 tions after their ordinary working hours. Deposits and cheques could lie 
 entered each day, and to prevent frauds it might be a sater rule to require 
 that all cheques be marked ^' good," and payable to the order of the 
 drawer himself. The telegraph and telephone would enable persons 
 having deposits in one bi'anch to draw at another. In country districts 
 the branch could be managed in connection with the post office, if the tele- 
 graph and telephone also were conducted by the public. By this method 
 all transactions, great and small, could be managed by a transfer of 
 accounts in the books of the bank. 
 
 A PORTION OF THE NATIONAL WEALTH DLSSIPATED. 
 
 "It was not because there was less wealth in the country, not because the 
 productions of men were less required, because there wer". as many men to feed, 
 clothe and house as in previous years, but they could not get anything to eat, 
 ■comparatively speaking." 
 
 Without stopping to enquire what kind of eating is comparative eating, 
 a beggar, no less than a prince, stands in need of food, clothing and shelter, 
 though he has often to go without for the want of means to procure them. 
 There is not the least doubt but a very appreciable amount of the nation-.J 
 wealth was dissipated during the late depression, besides what w^as con- 
 verted into fixed capital. 
 
 A NOVEL METHOD TO PREVENT PANICS. 
 
 " I hold that the way to prevent these panics is to make money iipon them." 
 
 And, pray, how can that be done 1 This, surely, is the most novel 
 Avay yet ot making money — upon panics. But Mr. Wallace knows how, 
 as his context shows. He continues : — 
 
 "I say by the Government making it, for the Govpinment can alone make 
 it, and paying it out for the public works we carry ok, and for the services ren- 
 dered to the Government, and the supplies furnished to the Government, making 
 it a public duty to pay for value received (?) until money is as it ought to be, the 
 ^iheapest thing in the country, until a man could not live by loaning money, but 
 would have to go to work and earn his money as the toilers do." 
 
 As I said above, no one V»ut the miners work to produce money or its 
 constituent, everybody works to produce jonsumable commodities. As 
 before remarked, there is no such class in a civilized society as money- 
 lenders, and therefore no man can make a living by lending money. It is 
 •capital, not money, which is lent. Suppose the Government issued notes. 
 
29 
 
 ^nch in every city, 
 hi^t eaeh capitalist, 
 in it, and that all 
 ney in exiatence as 
 lery for carrying it 
 Id be some devia- 
 ence it would, like 
 5 p.m. each day to 
 ir banking transac- 
 1 cheques could be 
 iter rule to require 
 
 the order of the 
 
 lid enable ])ersons 
 
 'n country districts 
 
 3t office, if the tele- 
 
 By this method 
 
 by a transfer of 
 
 [ PATED. 
 
 ntry, not because the 
 
 s many men to feed, 
 
 get anything to eat, 
 
 comparative eating, 
 othing and slielter, 
 s to procure them, 
 int of the natiomil 
 es what was con- 
 
 noney iipon them." 
 
 is the most novel 
 illace kno\vs how, 
 
 it can alone make 
 or the services ren- 
 overnment, making 
 it ought to be, the 
 caning money, but 
 o." 
 
 duce money or its 
 commodities*. As 
 ociety as money- 
 ing money. It is 
 lent issued notes. 
 
 which ic, no doubt, the hind of money referred to by Mr. Wallace, of any 
 denomination you please, as fast as a printing press could strike them oil", 
 and distributed them indiserimately to all classes, until they became so 
 abundant that every hou8ew7fe in the land could each morning light her 
 hre with a handful of $1,000 bills, it would not have the slightest eft'ect 
 on the rate of recompense paid a capitalist for the use of his capital. 
 Withoutcompensation he would not part with it, and to prevent that compen- 
 sation being given by penal legislation or other restrictions would be the most 
 direct and fatal blow that could be aimed at the prosperity and develop- 
 ment of any country under existing social relations. Tf capital is being 
 rapidly accumulated and abundant, the rate of interest or compensation will 
 be small, if it is scarce or the security doubtful, the rate of interest will be 
 proportionately high. 
 
 GOVERNMENT BONDS A LIEN ON THE COMMUNITY'S WEALTH. 
 
 "I think -» .it the Government of this country can save the people of this 
 country on ^ he $32,000,000 of bank circulation. There ib no money afloat by 
 paying out for the services rendered to their circulating notes that the people 
 want to do business with, and sa', j the interest that ia ]iaid on the $32,000,000 of 
 bank notes tnat are put in circulation, that are necessary for carrying on the 
 business of the country. When the Government go to Great Britain to borrow 
 money, what do they take ? They take paper, they take the bonds of this 
 country, over there and get money for it." 
 
 When a borrower, A, receives capital from a lender, B, A usually 
 transfers to Bin return a share in his (A's) interest in jn-operty owned by him 
 on certam conditions set down in a piece of paper called a mortgage. Every- 
 one knows that the paper is worthless, except as an abstract of the con- 
 ditions of contract, so with the Government bonds. They constitute a lien 
 on the entire wealth of the state, which the sheriffs, in their respective 
 bailiwicks, would collect under the direction of the Judiciary, if not other- 
 wise provided for. 
 
 GOVERNMENT LOANS WOULD RAISE INTEREST. 
 
 If this Gove.inmen". proposed to raise its loans at home, it would so 
 greatly raise the rate of interest against all other borrowers that every in- 
 dustry would stand in danger of being paralysed, if additional supplies did 
 not pour in from other countries. 1 presume that the reason the Govern- 
 ment go to London to float their loans is in expectation that they can bor« 
 row cheaper there than here. If they did not go there, it is probable that 
 some of the London capital seeking investment would, on hearing of a 
 Canadian loan, be sent hither for that purpose, but as the amount would be 
 much less than in the London market, causing the competition of tlie 
 lenders to be proportionally less active, the rate of interest would be higher. 
 Therefore, it is not only in the interest of the taxpayers generally, 1>ut of 
 borrowers, i.e., all producers, pai'ticularly, that the Government should con- 
 tract their loans in the cheapest market, because (1st) the taxes will be 
 less, and (2nd) the productions of the country increased. In so far as 
 the interest of the loan is so much abstracted from the annual income of 
 
80 
 
 the society, that would he so whether the capital w^as sent here for inveat- 
 ment or the Governiiicnt went where it was, with this difterenc6, that 
 the efttux would be greater if borrowed at home. 
 
 Mr. Wallace, [(erliapa, means that the retjuired loan should be borrowed 
 from our own capitalists without the introduction of foreign capital. Such 
 a policy is impossible, and it attempted could not fail to be a most 
 <lisastrous experijieut in financiering. There is not capital to spare in this 
 country ; if there was we would not l)e borrowing in foreign nmrkets. 
 
 Suppose that the (4overnment floated -i loan in the home market for 
 $10,000,000 for the pui'chase and «M(uipment of a navy, and the competition 
 was limited to home capitalists. It is obvious that this large sum must be 
 withdrawn from existing employments, for we have no capital to spare, no 
 hoards, no unemployed oaj)ital to fall back upon. This would greatly 
 depress labor if foreign capital did not flow in to fill up the vacuum, or 
 if a proportional number of laborers did not join the marines. Mr. Wallace 
 ■will answer the capital has only changed hands, the money is only trans- 
 ferred from one hand to another, and still i-emains in the country. This is 
 looking at one side only of the picture. It is true that the capital is still 
 in the country in the form of ships, machinery, tackle, etc. It has been 
 withdrawn from the wage fund and consumed unproductively. 
 
 THE GOVEKNMENT MAY ISSUE THE CURRENCY. 
 
 There is no doubt but the Government might legitimately take to 
 itbelf the issue of the whole circulating medium, without detriment to the 
 society, nor yet without any very signal advantage. The public benefit 
 would consist in saving the interest on the gold or other securities held as 
 bank i'eserves,if tlie (xovernment were absolved from that necessity. Or the 
 Government might charge two or three per cent, on all bank issues above 
 their reserves and other securities. It is also practicable for the Govern- 
 ment to issue legal tender or inconvertil)le notes without endangering their 
 depreciation, but this subterfuge would confer no other advantage than the 
 interest on the gold reserves for the redemption of convertiV)le currency. 
 
 MISTAKEN NOTIONS AUOIT WEALTH. 
 
 " Again, why is it that we who have more wealth in this country than Eng- 
 land have, however, to go to England to borrow money ? Do not all our fertile 
 lands, our forests, our minerals, constitute wealth ? " 
 
 Had not the aborigines these same fertile lands, forests and minerals 1 
 yet they have never been accounted a very wealthy community. Were they 
 not, and are they not still, in the midst of all this so-called wealth the 
 most wretched of the human race ? 
 
 USE ALONE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE VALUE. 
 
 " A man would give all the gold in the world, if he had it, for a loaf of bread 
 •when he was starving, or a drink of water when he was a thirsting." 
 
 To which Mr. Wallace might have added, and for a mouthful of air 
 if confined in a dungeon from which the air was excluded, or if drowning. 
 
no 
 
 take to 
 
 it to tlie 
 
 benefit 
 
 held as 
 
 Or the 
 
 above 
 
 Jov'ern- 
 
 ig their 
 
 In Eng- 
 fertile 
 
 lierals 1 
 they 
 bh the 
 
 bread 
 
 31 
 
 But would that lessen the value of the gold in the hands of the new pos- 
 sessor ] We all know that the finding of a treasure of gold would be of 
 no use except for ornamentation to a tribe of savages until they held com- 
 munication with a civilized community. But the instant that happened 
 their treasure would be of great use and value to them, and might be the 
 means of bringing them into a high state of prosperity and civilization, 
 though not invariably. 
 
 CONCLUSION, 
 
 The Finance Minister while repudiating the bantling, eulogizes its 
 sponsor, thus : — 
 
 "Sir LEONARD TILLEY. The hon. mover of this resolution spoke at 
 the close of his remarks of the imperfect manner, as he was pleased to say, in 
 which he had presented his case. Now, it is perhaps doubtful if there is any 
 other gentleman in the Dominion of Canada who has given this subject more 
 consideration, who undei-atands the subject better, or who could present it in a 
 more forcible manner than the hon. gentleman himself.'" 
 
 Such soft-solder is not only nauseating, but mischievous. If Mr. 
 Wallace has given the subject much or any consideration, all that can be 
 «aid is that it has been expended to little purpose ; and as for understanding 
 it, he does about as much as a "monkey " does Sanscrit. 
 
 TIIK END. 
 
 jf air 
 fniug.