.0 ... %^^^..% 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 Y 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 i^i2.8 
 
 no 
 
 1^ 
 
 2.5 
 2.2 
 
 SB.* 
 £ IS 110 
 
 1.8 
 
 11.25 ill 1.4 11.6 
 
 m 
 
 ffl 
 
 *;. 
 
 
 y 
 
 .!^ 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHIVI/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions 
 
 Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 1980 
 
Technical Notes / Notes techniques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Physical 
 features of this copy which may alter any of the 
 images in the reproduction are checked below. 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couvertures de couleur 
 
 L'Institut a microfilmd le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Certains 
 d^fauts susceptibles de nuire d la quality de la 
 reproduction sont not6s ci-dessous. 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured plates/ 
 Planches en couleur 
 
 1 
 f 
 
 ii 
 
 □ 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d6color6es, tachetdes ou piqu6es 
 
 Tight binding (may cause shadows or 
 distortion along interior margin)/ 
 Reliure serrd (peut causer de I'ombre ou 
 de la distortion le long de la marge 
 intdrieure) 
 
 
 
 Q 
 
 Show through/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 l\ 
 ii 
 u 
 b 
 f( 
 
 D 
 
 Additional comments/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires 
 
 Bibliographic Notes / Notes bibliographiques 
 
 n 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 □ 
 
 n 
 
 Pagination incorrect/ 
 Erreurs de pagination 
 
 Pages missing/ 
 Des pages manquent 
 
 Maps missing/ 
 
 Des cartes gdographiques manquent 
 
 D 
 
 Plates missing/ 
 
 Des planches manquent 
 
 □ 
 
 Additional comments/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires 
 
e 
 
 ins 
 I la 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall 
 contain the symbol —►(meaning COIVTIMJED"), 
 or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever 
 applies. 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin. compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettet6 de I'exemplaire f ilm«. et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la der- 
 nidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: 
 le symbols — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbole 
 V signifie "FIN". 
 
 The original copy was borrowed from, and 
 filmed with, the liind consent of the following 
 institution: 
 
 Library of the Public 
 
 Archives of Canada 
 
 Maps or plates too large to be entirely included 
 in one exposure are filmed beginning in the 
 upper left hand corner, left to right and top to 
 bottom, as muny frames as required. The 
 following diagrams illustrate the method: 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grflce d la 
 g6n6rosit6 de l'6tablissement prdteur 
 suivant : 
 
 La bibliothdque des Archivrss 
 
 pubiiques du Canada 
 
 Les cartes ou les planches trop grandes pour 6tre 
 reproduites en un seui clichd sont fiim6es d 
 partir de I'angle sup6rieure gauche, de gauche i 
 droite et de haut en bas, en prenant ie nombre 
 d'images ndcessaire. Le diagramme suivant 
 illustre la mdthode : 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 - 4- 
 
 8 
 
 6 
 
1 
 
The Writer of this Letter is 
 
 THE HON. SIR RICHARD CARTWRIGHT, 
 
 A Member of the Dominion Parliament of Canada; and who was Minister of Finance-, 
 in the Mackenzie Administration from 1S7J to i<V7<S'. 
 
 4'k 
 
 A ^^^'' 
 
 ^ 
 
 THE ECONOMIC CONDITION OF CANADA AND HER TRADE POLICY. 
 
 TO THE EDITOR OF THE ECONOMIST. 
 
 Sib, 
 
 I have observed that there has beeh a steady attempt for some coiisidenilile length of time, in 
 the coinmunicationa published in the English press as coming from Canada, lo misri'])resuiit the actual 
 economic condition of that country and also the objects of the Liberal party in Canada in pressing for free 
 trade with the United States. y ( ■■''''7 ^^^^ 
 
 As regards the first point, it is well l^nown to you and to your reaciei-s that Canada has been engaged 
 for the last thirteen years in the operation of trying to increase the collective wealth of tiie country by 
 doubling or trebling its taxation. 
 
 But it is not quite equally well known on your side of the Atlantic that it has become painiully 
 apparant for some time back, to everyone who has been at the jiains to examine the evidence which has 
 accumulated on the subject, that, even in that c(>m])aiatively short space of time, this most ill-advised 
 policy has resulted in a tremendous exodus of tlie very ciioicest portion of tlie |)opu)alion of Canada, and 
 in a very grave depreciation in tbe selling values of farm lands and of town anil village property tlirough- 
 out all the older sections of the Dominion, including Quebec, Ontario, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and 
 Prince Edward. 
 
 This has been accompanied, as is usual in such cases, by an inimense increase in the aggregate 
 indebtedness of the Dominion in the shape of large additions to its federal, provincial, and municipal 
 debts, and also to the mortgage debts incurred by private individuals and liabilities incurred for the 
 construction of railroads — by far the greater part of all which obligations are held abroad. 
 
 Briefly, in these thirteen years there has been a great displacement of wealth, caused mainly by 
 artificial legislation, but (as regards the older provinces) absolutely no increase at all of the collective 
 wealth of the community. Two or three cities, and perhaps a score of towns, have increased considerably, 
 and a few hundred individuals (who have been privileged to tax their fellows for their private advantage) 
 have grown rich by this system of legalised robbery; but the great mass of the population, and notably 
 the agricultural class, are distinctly poorer and less prosperous then they were twelve years ago. 
 
 Take the returns of the recent census. New Brunswick with a area of 30,0(X) square miles, 
 inhabited by about GO, 000 families, has added just sixty-one souls to her population from 1881 to 1891, 
 
 Nova Scotia, with a population of 440,000 souls in 1881, has done a little better, having gained 
 some 9,1)00 people in ten years — or rather less than one year's natural increase. 
 
 Ontario and Quebec, with unlimited quantities of unoccupied land, >liow an increase of perhaps 
 1 per cent, per annum, being rather less than that of England, and that in despite of an alleged immigra- 
 tion of nearly 900,000 people. 
 
 In one word, if the assertions and official statements of the present Government are to be relied on, 
 and these 900,000 immigrants did really come to Canada, as they assert, what between innuigrants who 
 came to Canada and who have quitted it, chiefly for the United States, and the loss of its own natural 
 increase which has disappeared in the same direction, the Dominion has lost not less than one million and 
 a- half of people in the last ten years. 
 
 As to the amouut of taxation, the agricultural class has been simply bled white. ' > > - 
 
 \ 
 
 *5 
 
2 
 
 Over and above the taxes actually jmid into the Dominion Treasury to bp expended f.ir so-called 
 Federal purposes, Ibey have been mulcted during all tlicse years under the jirotective system of at least an 
 equal amount, which is either totally wasted or goes into the pockets of a very small number of protected 
 manufacturers. 
 
 The exact amount levied, or, to speak more accurately, pillaged, in this way can hardly be estimated ; 
 but it is known not to be less than a sum fuUy equal to tlie entire amount credited to the Treasury, and 
 probably ranch exceeds it, ]n fact, the Canadian tariff (which has been, in the most literal manner, 
 dictated by the protected manufacturers) is so constructed that there are innumerable cases in which 
 for each single dollar paid into the Treasury, three, four, five and even ten dollars are taken out of 
 the pocket of the consumer; nay, in many instances the tax is made absolutely prohibitive, so that tlie 
 public are heavily taxed witi.'>ut any benefit to the revenue ; <?.'/., the duty on sugar is now so arranged (for 
 the advantage oF lialf-a-dozeu sugar refiners), that the Canadian consumer is obliged to pay a tax of nearly 
 two millions a year, of which only the most insignificant fraction finds its way into the public Treasury. 
 
 Tak Ml altogetlier, it is well within the mark to say that while the present nominal amount of 
 the taxation of the Dominion is about thirty-one millions of dollars, the genuine actual taxation, i.e., the 
 sum taken out of tlie pockets of the people for the benefit of tho protected manufacturers, in addition to 
 that paid into the Treasury is certainly not less, and is probably a good deal more than sixty millions 
 (^60,000,000). 
 
 As a very considerable section of the population of Canada — to wit, the French hahitans of Quebec 
 — consume a very small quantity of dutiable goods, this virtually means a taxation of £12,000,000 or 
 £13,000,000 levied from an effective tax-paying population of less than four millions, many of whom 
 are burthened with a very considerable direct taxation for municipal purposes besides. 
 
 Such an amount of taxation levied for thirteen years is a very formidable burthen for a country like 
 Canada to liear, and is undoubtedly one prime cause of the great loss of population, and of the immense 
 depreciation in Die values of town and farm property (a few special localities excepted), which has been 
 such a marked feature in tho economic condition of Canada during the last ten years. 
 
 It would be well if this were all, but unfortunately, the economic results of the protective system 
 adopted by Canada in 1879, grievous as they are, fade almost into insignificance compared with the 
 moral and political pollution it has brought in its train. 
 
 In this, as in many other cases, the indirect or secondary consequences of the fiscal system 
 misnamed protection are even more pernicious than its direct ones. 
 
 In the first place, by deluding the people into the idea that they can enrich themselves by increasing 
 their taxation, the old, wholesome, natural repugnances to increased taxation and expenditure is entirely 
 done away with, and the Government are encouraged to enter on a career of extravagant expenditure 
 which invariably involves per se, a great amount of corruption in one form or other — as has been very 
 notably the case in Canada. 
 
 In the second place, by making it the direct personal interest of a considerable number of active 
 business men, many of whom are wealthy, and all of wljom have the control of large sums of money, to 
 support a fiovernment, which gives them a free hand to tax the rest of tho community for their special 
 benefit, you lay broad and deep the foundations of a colossal system of organised corruption, in tho face of 
 which honest government becomes an impossibility. 
 
 lu such a ease, bribery becomes a pure matter of business routine. 
 
 The Government gives the protected manufacturers the po\\er to tax the people for their own 
 purposes, and the protected manufacturers in turn, whenever called upon, assess themselves in whatever 
 amounts the Government require in order to enable it to carry the elections. 
 
 The thing is done openly and shamelessly by both parties to the transaction. Prior to the general 
 elections of 1882, of 1887 and of 1891, Sir John Macdonald and his colleagues deliberately called the 
 protected manufacturers together, and demanded and obtained from them such sums as they deemed 
 necessary for the purpose of debauching the electorate, pledging themselves in return, not to alter the tariff 
 to the detriment of the said contributors, which compact was faithfully carried out and impudently avowed. 
 
 i; 
 
 / 
 
8 
 
 \ , 
 
 ^^ 
 
 :^! 
 
 , ". 
 
 V 
 
 V. 
 
 The facts are far too notorious to be denied ; 
 the Government of Canada with the intertited 
 disgraces Canadian public life is mainly due. 
 
 and it is to this deliberate conspiracy on the part of 
 manufacturers that the intokrablo corruption which 
 
 When the Government of any country deliberately abdicates its highest functions in favour of a 
 few selfish rings, and permits its Minister of Pinanco to become, in the most literal sense, the mere 
 mouthpiece of the manufacturers' association, in returnfor the right to toll the proceeds of the robbery 
 for political pui-poses, it is idle to expect anything from a Government or a Legislature elected by such 
 means and under such auspices, except precisely the results with which every newspaper in England and 
 the United Stales wore ringing during a great part of the past year. 
 
 It is not merely the policy, but the fixed determination of the Liberal party in the Dominion of 
 Canada to over ihcw this system at all hazards ; and, after very full deliberation, (hoy have come to the 
 conclusion that Mie best and probably the only really available method which presents itself for tliat 
 purpose, lies in i'ltroducing a system of perfect continental free trade, or unrestricted reciprocity, with the 
 United States. 
 
 Theoretically, no doubt, free trade with all nations would bo preferable ; but practically, and as a 
 matter of fact, free trade with the United States is vastly more valuable to Canada than free trade with all 
 the rest of the world would be with the L^'nited States left out. Moreover, there is a fair prospect ot 
 obtaining the one, and none at all, humanly speaking, of obtaining the other — at least, within any 
 reasonable space of time. 
 
 Canaila, no doubt, had very great opportunities in the past, which Criiada very foolishly threw 
 away, of securing for lierself a fiscal system very nearly as purely free trade as that of Great Britain, and 
 also a very low rate of taxation ; but those have passed and cannot now be recovered. 
 
 In these circumstances the twofold problem which to-day confronts Canadian statesmen ^^■orthy of 
 the name, is how to restore a fair measure of material prospeiity to the great mass of their cou!itrynien, 
 and check the tremendous exodus now going on of the very choicest part of their people to the United 
 States ; and, what is even more urgent, how to put a stop to the colossal system of organised corruption 
 which is milking Canada a veritable byeword among English-speaking nations for venality and mal- 
 administration. 
 
 Free trade or absolute reciprocity with the United States, will undoubtedly do more than anything 
 else which can be devised (with any prospect of success) to restore material jjrosperity, and to enable us 
 to keep our own people in our own country — in fact, as I have said above, in our present condition it is 
 the one piacticable measure which will do so; while as to the second object, it is equally plain, that 
 absolute freedom of interchange with the United States, means a death-blow to every corrupt ring in 
 Canada; and at the same time, by reason of the fact that, \\ bile it will immensely increase the general 
 wealth of the people, it will, temporarily at any rate, diminish the revenue collected under the present 
 system, it will enforce an amount of economy on tlie Administration, which will compel them to be honest, 
 even if not so inclined, and will make it out of the question to comply with the outrageous demands for 
 fresh bribes in the shape of unprofitable and utterly uncalled for public works and additional provincial 
 subsidies, which are of continual recurrence as matters now stand. 
 
 One thing, I think ought to be clear to all intelligent Englishmen, and that is, that it is utterly 
 impossible that Canada can prosper under her present conditions — isolated, and in danger of being still 
 more completely isolated, from trade and commerce with the entire continent to which she belongs 
 geographically, losing her population at the rate of one million and a half in ten years (if the official 
 statements of the present (Government are to bo relied on), and subject at the same time, to a sjstem of 
 taxation and of organised political corruption such as you have happily been strangers to since tiie days of 
 Walpole or Charles II. 
 
 The Liberal party of Canada, and indeed, the great bulk of the people of the Dominion, wish well 
 to the mother country, and it is very far from their desire to do anything which in the long run can injure 
 her interests ; but their duty in the premises is plain. 
 
 As Canadians, they must consult the advantage of Canada first, and if it be — as it appears to them 
 it is, beyond all possible controversy — for the best moral and material interests of Canada, to form a 
 commercial treaty, which will ensure perfect free trade with the United States, you on your side must bo 
 
content to allow thorn to try tlio fxporinient. It is, and always has been, my own very stronj^ desire that 
 this measure should be so conduetea. that it luipht ultimately result in removinc all possible causea of 
 conflict between the two great division of the Ikitish ract-, and end in bringing tliem together in a firm 
 and durable alliance: and (given only a very modei'atn amount of prudent statomanshij) on the part of the 
 English (loverninent) I see every reason to hope tiiat that end may be accomplished ; but whetlier or no, I see 
 still more clearly that some very radical ehang'j in the position of affairs in Canada must ha brought about, 
 and that very speedily, or else that the Canailian Confederation must perish, rotten before it has iiad time 
 to become even half r'ne, as the result of the vice and folly with which its affairs have been administered. 
 
 I have not deemed it worth my while to dwell at length on the dishonest and dishonourable 
 pretence advanced by tlie late Sir John A. Macdonald and his fellows, to the effect that their policy 
 of corruption and oxtortion was prompted by their fervent desire to preserve the connection between 
 Canada and the mother country. 
 
 In Canada such allegations arc treated with the contempt they merit ; and in England the fact 
 that those who make them are the identical persons who in 1870 deliberately turned their backs upon 
 the fiscal system of Great Britain, and deliberately adopted the system in vogue in the United States — 
 with full knowledge of the results which would inevitably follow — ought to be answer enough to anyone 
 who pri'teiuls to believe that loyalty to England is at the bottom of a systim of protection in Canada 
 or elsewhere, 
 
 But in truth the ijueslion btH«een the two Canadian parties is in reality an economi., one, and 
 in the long run resolves itself into this — shall Canada be governed for the benefit of tlie i)('oi)le of Canada, 
 or for the profit of a few hundred protected manufacturers, backed by a subsidised press and a purchased 
 majority in the Legislature ? , 
 
 To talk of loyalty in such a connection is little short of political blasphemy, and I can only express 
 my surprise that such a shallow subterfuge should have obtained e/en a momentary credence in the mind 
 of any Englishman of even average intelligence. 
 
 ' 
 
 "nf^ 
 
 " ^ gn w "1 ^ 
 
 I have the honour to remain, 
 
 ■■ w iii t r i" "?*' 
 
 .'f 
 
 Your obedient servant, 
 
 EICHAED J. CAIiTWRIGHT. 
 
 Kingston, January, 25ih 1892. 
 
 \ / 
 
 
 i 
 
 ^ 
 
 *i 
 
4