IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I 1.25 llfl^ IIIIIM '" "" 1 2.2 '- •- 1 2.0 U IIIIII.6 ^c-1 ^ ^>/ ^ % #7 / / u/^ /A Photographic Sciences Corporation # ^ S5§ > a^ \ .A> a <^^ riP ^%. CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques \ Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images m tha reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked below L Institut a microfilms le meilleur exemplatre qu il lui a ete possible de se procurer Les details de cet exempiaire qui sont peot-etre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier una image reproduite. ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la m*thode normale de filmage sont indiquAs ci-dessous. m u u D D □ n Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur Covers damaged/ Couverture endommagee Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaur^e at/ou pelliculee Cover title missing/ Le titre da couverture manque Coloured maps/ Cartes gAographiquas an couleur Coloured ink lie. other than blue or black)/ Encre da couleur lie. autre que blaue ou noiral Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches at/ou illustrations an couleur Bound with other material/ RaliA avac d'autres documents Tight binding may causa shadows or distortion along interior margin/ Laraliura sarree peut causer da I'ombra ou de la distorsion la long de la marge interieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout^es lors dune restauration apparaissant aans la texte, mais. lorsque cela 6tait possible, cas pages n ont pas Hi filmdes. Additional comments:/ Commentaires supplementaires I I Coloured pages/ Pages da couleur Pages damaged/ Pages endommageas C Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurees et/ou pelliculees |~T^ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ V Pages decolorees. tachetees ou piquees □ Pages detached/ Pages detachees I /\ Showthrough/ Transparence □ Quality of print varies/ Qualite in^gale de (impression □ Includes supplementary material/ Comprend du materiel supplementaire □ Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponibU n sponible Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiallement obscurcies par un feuillet derrata. une pelure. etc., ont 6te fiimies i nouveau de facon a obtenir la meilleure image possible This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ C« document est filme au taux de reduction indiqu^ ci-dessous 10X 14X 18X J 22X 26X 30X 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X I The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: '/'. ii, :'); to a state of gralaces— Jc/n ii, :;.S ; Jds xxii, K".; A>/c.s-. v, 20. With Salvation in :; places— -l/ ; ll,f,r iii, 21. With mystical burial with Christ in two place.-— A'o//i. \i, i-4; Colu!^. ii, 12. Our Catechism dex-lares that in liaptism we are mado •uneni il\K her.'i of CJirii't (ongrafting). cJdldrni of (Jod (adoption), \ 'nilnrHor-^ of iJi. K'nie children may be sinful, rebellious and wery disobedient— yed iJioy are His children to whom His joromises are wanted gifts. mad( ilJK A who claim His blossinirs as cove liegeneration is more than an outward act. It is tho ■fclamping of an image, the iu)i)arting of the gift of the Holy ¥*J)ost. as a f^nxl sown ; but it does not follow that every seed. .sewn grows, any more than that ovary Israelite who crossed the Red Sea arrived safely into the land of promise. " Don't you Church folk believe, then, that every one you baptize is saved?" Certainly not. Putting a man into a state of salvation does not imply his remaining there till the end. In short, Ilei?eneration is birth into God's family, with all consequent privilejjes and blessings. " You don't believe, then, that an infant is converted in Holy Baptism ?" No. Conversion implies actual sin— a life of unrighteousness. About it we will teach next Sunday night, i>.F. " But I don't see any diffierence between a man who has received the sacrament of Regeneration and one who has not." I dare say you don't. Do you see any diffierence in the same man after he has been made a Freemason ? No— but there is this difference: before he had no claim upon masonic charity or privileges or recognition. After he has a covenanted interest in every priviledge belonging to that body. Let me illustrate what I mean. " A sailor, born in England, had naturalized himself in ■the United States. During one of the many insurrections in Hayti he was at Port au Prince, and was seized by the military commander and condemned to be shot as an insur- rectionest. The American consul interceded for him as a United States subject, but in vain. Entreaties and threats were used to no purpose. Early next morning he was led forth to be shot. The firing party was ready. Both English and American Consuls appeared with their flags, wrapped his body in their colors, and dared the com- mander to fire upon the colors of the two greatest nations in the world. The man was saved." He was not born in the United States but he had been naturalized there— he was " born again " there. He was tiie same man after as before his naturalization, but those papers gave him a claim upon Uie United States governmei.t. It made liim a covonscptpd child of that Republic. In the same way, by nature we are children of wrath, but by the Sacrament of Regeneration we enter into covenant with God, and He i^ermits us to be His children and to claim his protection. " What is actually necessary for the due administration of this Sacrament?" Water (Christ was baptised in fre^h y water ai^^iiinM^rfMAaUAJUMi^, as the proper element for cleansing, and the name of the Trinity. There are some people wlio claim for themselves John Baptist's Baptism. They know not what they claim. In Acts xix we find that John's baptism was not into the name of the Trinity and therefore Paul baptized again those who had not received Christian Baptism. If the material (water) and the form (in the name of the Trinity) be wanting, the baptism is de- ficient. "For whom was this Sacrament of Regeneration designed?" Who can enter into covenant with God? For whom did Christ die? To whom were the promises made? Whom did Christ order His disciples to baptize ? The sign of admission under the Old Testament dispensa- tion was circumcision for every male on the 8th day. Rev. Joseph Parker of the City Temple, London, (not an Episco- palian,) says : " Listen to the covenant : * He that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you.' What an over- sight on the part of the Lord not to observe that a child eight days old could not understand what it was about? What a waste of piety to baptize an infant of days when it cannot understand what you are doing to it? For mvself, let me say that when I baptize a child, I baptize life- human life,— life redeemed by the Son of God. Tlie infant is something more than an infant, it is humanity ; it is an 8 lioir of Clirist's immortality. If Uioro bo any who can laujih n^S^n infant and mock its woaknoss, fltty har.' )io ri(j}it to liaptiz) (tin! roust crati' if, and /jirr so iman a tJi'mg to Go'l. (Jod llims(!lf baptizes tlio i^rcat troos, duos Ho tnor baptize a daisy? IIo onriclios Lobanon and Bashan witii ram, but did IIo over ban^r tbo dew (if tb(^ niorninj^ u^wn tbo siirinkm;^ loso? . . Tbo cliild doos not amhrstaiul tlio alphabet, do not teach it; the child doos not wnUrsland language, do not teach it; tbo child does not undtrslamf tbo Lcjrd's Prayer, do not teach it. Von say tiie child will inuhr- xtaud by and by. Exactly so; that answer is good; ond % (Old hy tlir <-]idd n-'d/ uixfi rsfdtid (Jad it n'us hajdizcd in tbo Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy (ihost, throe persons in one (Jod." IJAI'TISM IS AlhMlSSION INTO COVKXANT ^VITH (iOI>. Tlio groat (question about Infant Baptism is, '' Can infants bo brought into covenant with God ?" Is not God's order plain in JJnif. xxix. vs. If), 11, IL' (?) : "You stand this day all of y(»u before ti)e I^ord ; your captains, &.V., your littlk ONES, ike, that thou shouldest enter into covenant with the Lord thy God, and into His oath." This was a covenant, not only to give them the land of Canaan, but "to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee." The man's })art was "to love the Lord, to walk in His ways, and to keep His commandments.'' The coven- ant of the Ton Commandments was also with infants. Forty years after, Moses said : "The Lord made a coven- ant with us m Horeb, even with us who are all of us hero alive this day." Jhid. v, 2, :5. Most of these were at that time infants and little children. To Abraham and those who believed, it was " a seal of the righteousness of Faith" ; to infants it was a seal of the covenant by which they were ■ 9 I eiv^a! "./",'•■• l>i<-l tl»o Saviour say l)a{)tizo tlireo fifths of evory nation? To whom woro ttio oromises mado? "To you and your rItiMm,:' .Ir/x ii, :]\K But infants cannot kec[) Clod's law '.' Cannot thoy ? God says tho <'hild of eight days old can broak His law (Gon. 17, 14.) Hoir wc do not know, but (loil says so. What is capr,- able of breaking is cai>ablo of keeping. The command to Baptize all nations is not fultilled by those who would ex- clude infants from being Baptized, any more than tho com- mand to destroy all the Canaanites would have been obeyed {IJiut. vii, 2, 10) if instead of taking the command literally the Israelites had argued, on independent grounds — that God must have meant (dl hut the cJuldnh. "But there is no plain command?'' Is there a com- mand for keeping Sunday holy ? Is there a command for family worship? for Sunday Schools ? for women as Com- municants? The Jews ahvai/s included little children in tho covenant with God. St. Paul in writing to the Epiiesians addres.sos not only the fathers, mothers and servants, but also the children. The same apostle in 1 Cor. vii, 14, calls the child- ren "holi/.'' Whole households (and according to Greek cus- tom, the household included dann and their chlldnn) were Baptized Artx x\i, Ki, (Lydia's) Ads xvi, 3:'>, (Jailor) Act>^ x, (Cornelius) 1 Cor. i, Ki, (Stcphonfis). Is it at all likely that in four liouseholds there would be no children. For we read "he and cdl his wore Baptized?" Among the Jews, Proselytes and thoir cbildron were Baptized. If the admission of children into God's covenant was a thing unheard of, an express command to admit thom would have been necessary, but, as itwat the rule, and Christ did not forbid it, we must believe it His will to admit the children. Did He forbid the coming of the children ? S3e Mark x, 15, 16. He bluiued those that would have kept them from Him. He sets the little cnild as a model— a pattern for them iftheywonld enter into Hi? Kingdom. Will Christ admit these made like to the pattern and exclude the pattern it- self ? If they are fit for His Kingdom above, are they not fit to be admitted into His Kingdom on earth, the Church ? Is the Christian covenant narrower than the Mosaic dispen- sation which admitted children of eight days old? Christ says : " He that helieivth and is Bapti2,ed shall be saved." ''Children cannot believe." Perhaps not. But have they not the germ of reason ? Why not the germ of Faith also? The Saviour concludes the verse that you have begun by saying : " he that believeth not, shall be damned"— will any one be foolish enough to say " a child is damned because it has not understanding faith?" "Ex- cept ye repent, ye shall likewise perish." Children cannot repent, shall they therefore perish ? "If a man will not work, neither shall he eat ?" A child cannot work, shall he there- fore not eat ? For 1500 years after Christ, Infant Baptism was practis- ed—and the most learned opponent of Infant Baptism has never yet been able to adduce a particle of credible histori- cal testimony which tells tho time and the place where this practice took its rise. " How is tl e Sacrament of Baptism to be administered ?" Has aiy particular mode been ordered ? Where no order is given liberty is p3rmitted. We acknowlelge as legitimate modes of administering the Sacrament, immergion (Rubric in Baptism for Those of Riper Years, says : " Then shall dip him or pour water upon him"), pouring or affusion and sprinkling. But we do mot Hmit the validity of the Sacra- ment to one particular mode of administering its outward sign, for we recognize the precise mode in which the outward sign is administered only as a matter of ritual, and no mere matter of ritual is binding upon all, nor can it invalidate the Regenerating Sacrament. Reference is likely made to immersion in connection with Baptism in Roman 6, 1^, and Colosians 2, 12. But we can- not believe that it is consistent with the law of Christian liberty to make the blessings of the Sacrament depend upon the meclvanical method of its administration, nor upon the quantity of water used. It certainly is not consistent with analogy that the details of the initiatory Sacrament should be legally arranged any more than those of the Sacramont of the Lord's Supper; and it is a fact that in some "swell" congregations in the neighboring republic where '' immer- sion only" obtains, that a waterproof suit or some other device permits only a small quantity of the fresh water used to touch the face of the " immersed." If Baptism be tne only means of admission into the visible Church of God, and Baptism by immersion the only valid means of of performing the Sacrament, for hundreds of years during vihich immersion ivas not practiced there could have been no visible Church of God.* This would make Christ's words untrue, for He founded His Church ; with that Church He promised to be always ; therefore it must al^vays have been in existence. There was, is and ever will he in the world His •When Roger Willianid instituted his Society of Baptists in Rhode Island in 1639, he could not find any innner'ied person to immerse him. Bo Mr. Ezekiel Holliman (or Hollahan). nfttnminyifer, lutt limurrHi'.d, n'4 a member <>/ a Church, immersed Mr. Williams, then Mr. Williams im- mersed him. 12 visible C'luirch. Men inuy fouiul societies, doing good ^V(.i•k fijr Christ, ])ut nr always think that the Soeiety foiuuleil by Ilini must be the best, the widest— so wide that it 4'an take in tlie children of eight days old. '' But does not Baptism always mean immersion in the New Testament?" Certainly not. I can understand a man ^vh() has no ac(iuaintance with the language in which the ^'ew Testament was mainly written saying this, but I cannot understand this argument being used by the editor of a religi ous journal without sui»posing he had forgotten his (ireek Testament. Such an argument may do for those who think the New Testament was written in English but not for anyone with an unbiased mind and a little knowledge of the Greek in which the Cospels were written. If we can lind one place in which the Greek word for baptize cannot mean immerse this argument is quite overthrown. But we can find not one but//v places where the word cannr.t be rightly translate) "immerse." In St. :Mark vii, 2-:')-4, we read: "And when they saw some of His disci])le eat bread with defiled (that is to say with unwashen hands) they found fault. For the Pharisees and all tl.e Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding tiie tradition of the (dders. And T.hen thcv come from the market, except they wash (r/yv/j bai)tize) they eat not. And many other things they have receivtMl to hold, as the washing [Gr twi'lvi' or fourt'HMi feet lon.ir. If you would know what thcs ' haptisius were, and how they were p^rforine.l, you have only to turn to the IJook of Numbers, xix, 18 to end, where the whole eereniony is des>^ribed as eonsistin;z in spr'niki'nuj water upon the furniture to be cleaned with a bunch of hyssop. For this purpose families were sup[>lie I with " \vaterp:)ts containing two or three firkins apiece." Jnlm ii, (">. Another passa;j;e wher(> "baptize" cannot be translated imni 'rse is I Cor. x, 1-2 The Apostle says the (diildren of Israel were baptized in the ch^id. If we turn to Exodus xiv, 19-20, we learn the cloud changed its position from front to rear. As for immersion in this cloud, it is absurd. The only way in wdiich they could ])e bai)tized in it was by its pouring or raining upon them. Tiuis tlie baptism here spoken of was by sprinkling. St. Paul informs us they were l)aptized in the sea. Many people who do not compare Scripture with Scripture Avould at once jump to the conclusion, "Tliis certainly means immerse in salt wa^er." We know better. In Exodus xiv, 22, we read they went over on drff ground; in the 29th verse, " walked upon (hy ground in the midst of the waters." Though they were not immersed, they were baptized; those who were that day immersed, the Egyptians, werj not baptized. In these five places liaptize cannot mean immersa. The word baptize has a generic meaning, similar to our English word travel— \\Q travel, whether we journey by water, by foot, or on horseback. A short-sighted m'ln might have limited th^ blessings of the Sacrament of Regeneration to one mode of administration, but the all-knowing Sajdour could foresee that a man upon a sick bed, or perlu^ a deathbed, could not be immrml; is he not to haw3 the sign 14 of admission into the covenant with God ? The Saviour knew that ministers would sometimes suffer from acute diseases which would prevent them ffom immersing any one desirous of being baptized ; are they therefore to remain unbaptized? Can we suppose that the Saviour would institute any sucli mode of admission into His spiritual Kingdom as could be enjoyed only by those who were favored with good bodily health? What has the condition of « man's mortal body to do with the salvation of his immortal spirit f Baptism is the seal of the covenant and may be applied to every creature whatever the condition of his body. Baptism with water is emblematical of the work of the Holy Spirit. Does the Scripture ever mention immersing in the Spirit? I^t us search the Scriptures and see. In St. Matthew iii, 3, our Saviour promises to baptize His Apostles with the Holy Ghoat. How was it done? In Acts ii, 1-4, we see how. In verse 16 we find St. Peter saying the Holy Spirit was " poured out" In Isaiah Iii, 15, we read : " So shall He sprinkle many nations." In Ezekiel xxxvi, 25 : " Then will I sprinkle clean \^ter upon you and ye shall be clean : from all your filthiness and from all your idols I will cleanse you." In Hebrews x, 22 : " Let us draw near with a true heart, in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water." In I St. Peter i, 2. "Elect through the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ." In Proverbs i, 23: '' 1 vfill pour out my spirit upon him." In Joel, ii, 28 : " I will pour out my spirit." In Acts ii, 17-28 : " I will pour out my spirit." In Acts x, 45 : " On Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost." I^Acts ix, 18, we do not read of Saul's going out of the house in wiiich he was when Ananias baptized him ; neither 15 I do we read 8o of Cornelius in Acts x; nor of the jailor baptized near midnight, in Acts xvi. But In Acts viii, 35-39, we read of the Enuch's g^lhg into the water. Into does not mean under. May a person not go into the water without being immersed ? Moreover the same word which is translated into in Acts viii, 38, is translated unto in both St. Matthe^v xxii, 4, and St. John xi, 31. It must be plain to every unprejudiced person that restricting to one mode or one a^e the blessings of a Sacra- ment, made " generally necess.^/y" to Salvation by Jesus Christ is "watering down" His wide, world-embracing covenant to a greater thinness than that of the Mosaic dispensation. For when God first established Bis Church on earth, he decided for reasons which it does not become us to question, that His Church should be composed of adults and infants. By His explicit command little children at the age oi eight days {Gen. xvii, 12) were to be made members of His Church {Acts vii, 38) by receiving the Seal of the Covenant. Are these things so? Search and see. To say that an unconscious child is not a fit subject for membership in the Church of the living God is to accuse the Almighty of folly. The idea of infant membership was not a mggestion of Abraham, but a command from God. It may be objected that Christ came to do away with the Mosaic dispensation and all that pertained to it. If we grant this (though He >vas to do away with it by absorption and improvement, not by annihilation), the claim of this argument is not long enougn to reach Infant Baptism, for the Church membership of infants was not Mosaic but Abrahamic, a covenant older than the birth of Moses by 300 years. Brethren, let us remember, whether our Baptism l:>e^^t or adult, by immersion or affusion, that in Baptism we are 16 .»?#- priviloized to (Mitor into covcMiant with Gol ; t)iat it i.s the beginning of a ('t>v(Miaute.I liiV \n the wilJcriu'ss of the worlil; that for that hfe^e want h('li)S l)y the way, ami wo must obtain thorn d'lih/, unlor tlie same coulitions im- pose;! r.i»on the I.sraelites Avhen they — also a covenanted peo}»l<> — wore (••mmanle;! to ,L;ath(;r their fooil day by day, wlioi: the frosliu'vss of God's dew was upon the wo aro baptized, be ascribed all miglit, majesty and udttry, now and forever. Amen. NoTK. — Some atlirin til It wiiilc the Hiptists h ul no orginized (!hurcli until the ITtli ci-ntury (W.i'J), yet indiviifiiil.^ who held li iptist sentiments were rJci'-tcred tlu-oii.;hoiit Chri-itendom in o irly :isos, known a.s \lhigensei and AValden:?e-!. 'I'ir- Waldeiine.-s were a sect whieh ai>pe ired m the Tith c?n- 'iry and h id a llii-cef