.^^/^. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I I 40 la 1^ mil 2.2 i.8 1.25 1.4 ill ''^ the plain n, surely ' like any -surely it Bible, if tand that leretoforc izle them fashionwl -that it is 8 of Mil- rom that mews tho lese days, spiration, g scolded 1 faith to to declare P sarcasm ery nesd- ts. DO doubt ilare what veil as in once deli- >iration of ;o a great extent latent, may bo said to pervade the soil of modern thought and modern sentiment. The tacit assumption that the super- natural must be eliminated from the religion of t .o nineteenth century, rules the method of the new criticism. And though naturalistic explanations are advanced by those who shrink from shocking others by expressing, and, it may be, shrink from shocking themselves by forming, a conviction, that belief ia the supernatural is fast becoming a superstition of the past, yet the antagonism between the two ideas in mind^ of the modern cast, is fundamental. The internecine character of the conflict is sometimes avowed— more often it is insinuated; and the faith is undermined by the prevarication of those who undertake to defend only to betray. Men will explain away the miracles of Moses, out of their desire to build Christianity upon a credible foundation! But what will they do with the superstructure? Is not Jesus a worker of miracles, or an impostor? My Brethren, artful men and able are en- gaged in this work; and we owe it to ourselves, as well as to those over whose souls we are set to watch, to be wary. The habit of mind which has been induced by nauseating the miracles of the Old Testament, will cling to us when we come to consider those of the New,— which we shall reject, because we shall come to them prepared to reject. Evidence will be of no force ; for by that time the mind will despis-; evidence, and dismiss it with a sneer. And indeed, if sneers were proofs, our most holy faith had been exploded long ago. But if we are to struggle for. our faith, why should we train ourselves for the encounter upon this debilitating diet ? Why should we allow our opponents to impose upon U8 the tactics that may happen to suit them? Every mind has a right to its own method. The sceptics have their way of dealing with miracles. We, if we are wise, shall have another. This question of miracle or no miracle is without doubt the hinge of our faith. If a miracle be an impossibility, then is the Gospel a cunningly devised fable. And our wisest course is to try this issue directly. The best thing a man can do, when he is invited to discuss minor difficulties, is to turn, before his reason has been tampered JP^P 1 'i ^ 10 with,toBomeone of the leading miracles recorded in the New Testa- ment -to the miracle for example that is the foundation upon which the whole fabric of the Gospel stands-the Resurrection of our Blessed Lord,-and settle that, once for all. It is a fact or it is a falsehood. Itiscapableofproof,oritisnot. ^^^ « J^l l>« P^/^J we need not be over anxious about lesser difficulties. If it cannot be proved, why, we need not be over anxious m that case, I suppose. They are not worth a thought. This or some simUar plan that will arm the mind for an encounter with doubt at any moment is essential ; for we are challenged at every turn ; and we shall err as widely if we attribute the modern tendency to spurn at a miracle to a particular book or two, as if we were to attribute the combustibility of tinder to the spark whioh ignites it. Ihe cause lies deeper,-in the processes to which material so quick to burn has been subjected. ^„„t,VT, I do not purpose to investigate these causes. I only mention them to guard ourselves against supposing, when a rash writer has been refuted, or the noise of a startling volume has died away, that the danger has passed. It is not wise to forget that the influences by which we are surrounded are such as engender doubt , Which may therefore be expected, when exorcised under one form, to reappear in another. I have indicated what seems to me the best method of meeting it,-the best ground upon which to give battle. It may be well, however, in view of the constant skirmishes with the sceptic to which our faith is exposed almost every time we open a newspaper or a magazine, to equip ourselves with one or two principles of defence, upon which arguments may be received and their temper tried whether they have reason and weight, or whether they be mere flourish and assertion. And with this view, when we find, as we shall find, that the opposition between science and scripture is now and again forced, with no little parade, upon our notice, we should do well to remember that the facts of science are one thing and the conjectures of scientific men another. No little perplexity, no little fallacy, I do not say sophisti^ lor the mischief Peems to arise from a real confusion of niind, no httle fallacy is introduced into a man's thoughts by neglecting to distin- -,.:_i, u.._p„„ f\.^ac. Ti^anvJps jiTP. thrown out bv man oi science i [ jw Testa- »on which n of our , or it is a le proved, .. If it that case, le similar bt at any i; and we to spurn attribute it. The ) quick to y mention writer has iied away, D that the ier doubt ; ' one form, to me the ich to give skirmishes every time s with one be received weight, or li this view, reea science irade, upon la of science other. No try, for the id, no little ng to distin- n of science continually, with more or less of argument to support them, and by the unthinking the crude guesses of eminent men are credited with all the authority attachic3 to their demonstrations; so that a plain man, who discusses an argument, of the validity of which he is quite competent to judge, is in danger to be set down as k sciolist, meddling with matters above his comprehension.^ Now an educated man is not to be put off or put down in this way. His knowledge may be limited, but he knows its limits, and within them he will walk at large. He knows that much that comes from men who have made science their study is not science; and, when he bears of the opposition between science and religion, his first look will be to see whether this opposing element be science or something else. I would next observe, that infidel writers are strong only when they are negative, while they are on at ground we are in- stinctively with them, for most of us, when we think, put more questions to ourselves than we are able to answer. But after all, even the most sceptical of intellects cannot live by negations. The man who will not, or cannot, believe in the truth of Christ- ianity , feels bound to account for its existence. This is reasonable. Christianity comes before us as a fact. It assumes to be true. It has been, taken to be true; and, until some more credible account of its origin and existence is furnished, the presumption iB that it is true. In dealing therefore then with those who call in question the truth of the Gospel narrative, our best plan will be to Jook into their positive teaching— not to occupy ourselves with their ques- tions, which we can put, and, over and over again, have put, for ourselves, but to consider their answers, and see if they be more ere- dible than our old-fashioned beliefs. When a man, for example, unable to accept a miracle, but unwilling to renounce the Scrip- tures, would have us believe that the miraculous narratives of the Goripel are not narratives of fact, but the embodiment of ideas, we can, without much trouble, apply this theory to some one of the record- ed miracles. It will break down at the first strain ; and we shafl see that the writers of the Gospel unquestionably intended to pass them off for true accounts of real facts, and succeeded in doing 12 BO. If not histories, the gospels must he most impudent forgeries. But we must read the Scriptures for ourselves- We must take no account of what they are, or what they say, at second hand. This is important. So long as you assume that a writer's representa- tion of Scripture is exact, the plausibility of his argument keeps pace with the ingenuity of his theory ; but so soou as you turn to the book, sift his assertions, open out his implications, and investi- gate for yourself, the thin cohesion melts beneath your eye : and, handling his argument as you grasp for substance, your fingers close upon the impalpable dust of delusion. One shall, for example, (to consider for a moment one of the late theological importations) one shall, in following the theorist as he manipulates his facts, interweaves his ideas, and draws out the staple of his discourse, one shall, as the dexterous pleader leads him on, feel stealing through the mind a disposition to acquiesce in the doctrine that the writings of the New Testament are not veritable records, but the growth of after-times— not forgeries indeed, nor even pious frauds, in their first promulgation ; but the peculiar forms in which the modesty of the times veiled the teacher's obtrusiveness by inculcating its dogmas through the personation of St. Paul and St. Peter, St. John and St. Matthew. So long as you are content to see with the eyes of your guide, all is plausible and smooth ; but if you open your own eyes and look for yourself at the writings which have been so plastic in the theorizer's hands, you are astounded at the audacity of his attempt upon your understanding. As well might he propose to convince you that the fossils in your museum, broken, enigmatical, worn by friction, pressure and time, are the constructions by which some pro- fessor, bond fide, and with no intention to deceive, would exhibi- to the best of his understanding the actual living forms of extinct organisms. The thing is incredible. Their air of genuineness is either the stamp of truth or the simulation of deceit. They may be fragments of the past, or they may be spurious imitations. They must be the one or the other. If not what they purport to be, they are the fabrications of deceivers. With these cautions then — (1) to distinguish between the accepted conclusions and the tentative crotchets of science ; (2) i4 ; forgeries, ist take no md. This •epresenta- tent keeps ou turn to tid investi- eye : and, )ur fingers jne of the le theorist draws out iader leads acquiesce it are not t forgeries ition ; but veiled the rough the Matthew. 3ur guide, eyes and stic in the lis attempt convince 1, worn by L some pro- Id exhibi- of extinct lineness is They may imitations, purport to tween the ence; (2) 18 to accept no statements rtipocting Scripture, till we have verified them by personal investigation ; (3) to examine calmly whether the Catholic belief touching the Christian religion,or that which the sceptic proposes to substitute for it, be the more credible ; (4) to discuss the question of jairacles not upon minor occasions, but in relation to some one of the cardinal facts of the Gospel —with these cautions we may pass through the pelting shower of modern infidelity, and find much of it innocuous. Their obser- vance will burnish into brightness that shield of faith wherewith we shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. Thus much I have thought it necessary to say respecting those matters in relation to which recent action of our own connects itself with painful proceedings in the church elsewhere, I will now turn to questions not indeed more immediately concerning, but of which the interest is more restricted to ourselves. And herein our thanks are due to Almighty God for that, among us, the church prospers. . . Twelve months ago there were four vacant missions and little prospect of fiUing them. I now see my way to the filling of them aU andfilling them well; I have admitted three to the order of the Priesthood and ordained two to be Deacons ; and four Laymen I have licensed as Readers to assist certain missionaries; I have consecrated three churches ; I have held confirmations m almost aU the missions of the Diocese, with the exception of those in the Gulf The number of those . confirmed amounts to 987. These figures I am not able to compare with those of previous years, but I believe that, in most cases, the numbers have increased: a fact which is matter of thankfulness for two reasons; first, for the sake of the young themselves, confirmation being found, I believe in the experience of earnest ministers, to be a seed time of the Spirit,-and secondly, for the sake of the church-confir- mations being, emphatically, tokens of the future. We cannot see into the hearts of our little ones; but at any rate we can see how many are indisposed to turn their backs upon the covenant of their baptism. We can see in the number of candidates for confirmation, whether the church, in each locality, advances, or retrogrades. And a mag may judge, too, in a measure, of his own Il- work. A matter in which it U possihle to be deceived. We enter upon the fruit of our predecessor's labours. This is a con- dition of life. The congregation,, to whom we minister, our elders, or our equals in age, these are not the work of our hands- We must look on a few years, till these drop off, and the new generation takes their place; then will be seen the fruit of our labour, if fruit it have. In the mean time, if we really feel that we watch for souls as those that must give account, we cannot fail earnestly to consider this most significant prognostic of our success or failure. Other things, however, arc significant in our confirma- tions besides numbers. The manifest seriousness and devout feeling with which the candidates generally have come to renew their dedication to God's service, could not fail to strike the observer, and to fill those concerned in the administration of the rite with the liveliest hope; which hope has been strengthened by the farther evidence that many of the candidates have given of their earnest- ness of purpose by coming to taste the fulness of Christian joy m Holy Communion. And now my Reverend Brethren, whilst I am discussing the evidences of efficiency in our calling, it will be ap well, perhaps, to enter a little into the causes which contribute to that efficiency. In so doing I shall mention but a few, and even these we shall only be able to sketch, without fully depicting. I will confine myself then to three elements of ministerial efficiency, and consider the clergyman's : 1. Habit of Study ; 2. His Power op Prbaohing, and 3. The Spirituality op his Character. These are essential; for the Priest's lips must keep knowledge; the minister of the gospel must be apt to teach; and if he have not the Spirit of Christ, he can be none of His. The clergyman should be a man given to reading. To teach is his calling ; and when a man ceases to learn, he is no longer fit to teach. Time was when it was esteemed that the study was the clergyman's workshop, in which he becomingly spent the greater part of his working hours. No doubt this was carried a little too sf?r 1 d. We 18 a oon- iter, our r bandB' the new b of our feel i^at nnot fail r suooess spnfirma- it feeling ew their Dbserver, rite with le farther ■ earncst- istian joy ssing the irhaps, to iffioiency. shall only le myself isider the Qowledge ; f he have ?o teach is nger fit to ly was tlie be greater a little too 15 ^ ?n waotice • and the active duties of a olergy- for in opinion and m practice , f^^J^ . ^^^ j ^^ ^ery ^anwere in those days too "'^f °^^;^°^^^^^^^^ far in the ^uch mistaken the pendiduin ^^J^^^^^^ l^^^,^,,, ,,ould opposite ^--^Xlfte Xretll^ in the clerical character, ohoke the gy-f ?^^^^;;^;^^^^^^^^^ can be neglected without In truth --" J^J^^,, ao not go to his people, they wiU loss of power If the ^^^^^ „ot enriched by reading, and not come to him; and if h s mind ne ^, ^^ ^^le cultivated by ^^^flf^^^ZZ:^, 71 o^ly accomplish and wearisome; or, it he aim ai v j, ^ p„^. by — s i^:^:xi^ ^: L tporU tohor into to »«^^^ 7'Xn the Bubjeot ,U1 be mtroduoed t„Vakfor . few m.™.e» »F»J^-^;S^'^,^,.„„a^^^^^ J^' *c S t;:rnoTru»erou. ;-b«t I donot «e be more effective it tney w^^ic exaction of many a>atwe can n>.ke the» 1----J ^^'S.Zit «rebe J sermons is too impenonstobemthstooa. "« j. i, people ;f*37J -';„lt:olf:p:^»^e^ A- you n.ay readUy suppo^, f^I ^^n^y mi^e t B„t preaching, that I speak thus, f"' J ""^^^ ^„ amt onr quality is before quantity. And mtb a ™w to ^ preaching be effeetiye «f^f P»7'\'' ^J^" I po«th the gospel were not e-et^*™' *;^^ 'iZe W-d. «"Pl-'J rf::^Lzrct^:^'--roftheK™seu^^ 11^ 16 School came not only an accession of fervour, but a keener perception of the value of doctrine. When earnest men are possessed of a truth which is not appreciated, they press it home. The greater the resistance— the more vital the truth, the greater is the danger of its being exaggerated, the more likely are we to lose of the sym- metry of truin. And so penetrated were these men with the momentous importance of the doctrines of the atonement, of grace, of justification by faith, that all else sank into comparative insig- nifiance. The extreme results of such preaching are the neglecting to look for the fruit of belief in the life of the believer, and the passing by as inconsiderable trifles, the neceasities of order. In reaction from this state of things, rose what may be called the ecclesiasticalstyle,t)rotesting against the exaltation of doctrine over morality, and insisting upon the efficacy of the Sacraments and the authority of the Church. My Brethren, we can dispense with none of these, which have been perhaps each in their day, too exclusively the topics of preaching. Certainly we can dispense neither with doctrinal statement, nor with the enforcement of duty. Fur- ther, we must propound these in their relation to each other, and always doubt the soundness of our doctrine if it do not produce holiness of life. And again, he who is ashamed, or afraid, upon fitting occasions, and in due proportion, to preach the Church, is her unworthy minister. Our people ought to be at least as well instructed in our principles as those who dissent from us are in theirs. Dissenters always know what it is they object to in our system. They know why they dissent; and we ought to know why we do not. There seems a strange misapprehension on this point in many men's minds. What is only fair and legitimate in others is bigotry in us. We must not fear this. If we are in the right, let us know it ; if we are in the wrong, let us know that; and let us put into the mouths of our people an answer to this question, "Why are you a Churchman ?" One who is not a Churchman would be very much affronted if you supposed he had no answer to the question, '* Why are you a Baptist?" " Why are you a Methodist ?" or " Why are you an Universalist ?" We only claim for ourselves what all others claim for themselves. Well then we me. IT cannot dispense with any of these elements, of duty, of doctrine, or of Church principles, from our teaching ; but, my Brethren, we shall make a fearful mistake if we substitute any, or all of them for Christ. He must be the Sun of our system. The light from His Person must irradiate all our teaching. Its warmth must be felt in all our discourses. Neither sacrament nor dogma must be suffered to obscure its rays. They are lamps to hold the light. Woe be to us if we fall down and worship them as though they were the light. Christ is the Light : Christ is the Life. To lead the soul to him, is the final cause of Church, and Sacrament, and Dogma : worthless, worse than worthless, are aU these, if by stopping short of, they keep the soul from Him; or, rather, worth- less are we, if we so misuse and pervert them. Now, the use of sermons being mainly to awaken, or to edify, they must in the former case address themselves mainly to the feelings, in the latter case to the understanding; or, by another treatment of the feelings, win to the practice of, whilst they point out the way to attain, the Christian graces. The former kind are undoubtedly the most popular with an uneducated people; the latter are apt to be dull, at least if the instruction be sufficiently elementary to be useful to those who most need it. Not that I admit the justice of the common cry against the dulness of sermons. The common fallacy on this point is to compare the ordinary clergyman with the brilliant barrister, and in this way, of course, a pretty strong contrast can be attained. But I have not been able to perceive so striking a difference when the men were fairly matched. Of the few emi- nently eloquent men of an age, the fair proportion, it seems to me, are, and have been, ecclesiastics. And I have seen nothing tending to show that if all the occupants of the ba«k benches of the court-house were required to produce two original compositions, upon a limited range of subjects, for the same audience, for the rest of their natural lives, I have seen nothing tending to show that these productions, viewed as literary performances, would be any way superior to the sermons now usually delivered. But there is a cause of the dulness of sermons which it becomes us to look fairly in the face. Systematic instruction is always tiresome to B df**^ H- 18 thoBe who have no eager desire to learn. By Bystematio inBtmc- tion I do not here mean doctrinal argumeut,— whioh has always been popular when popularly handled,-nor do I mean exposition, which is also popular, and might be introduced into our preaching with advantage,-but that connected statement, and agam and acrain repeated inculcation of first principles, which we call ground- bar And yet systematic instruction such as this cannot be dispensed with. I believe we sufer both from its introduction to and its omission from our sermons. There are many, it must be recollected, whose religious knowledge is confined to what they hear in Church. And though children should certainly be -rounded in the Mik at home and in school, yet many are not' and he whose office it is to preach the Gospel to all, must contrive somehow to suit his public ministrations to the capacities and attainments of all. ^ The state of he case seems to be, that the confcinuoua formal address which we call a sermon, is, in these days, though a power- ful yet but an imperfect preaching of the Gospel. The problem before us then is to find the proper complement of the sermon. And he I think, will have made the nearest approach to a solution of the problem who has made the best use of catechetical instruc- tion For thoroughness there is no teaching like catechetical teaching, (save the employment of the pen, which may in some cases be very well combined with it). As a lever of emoti^ it is not comparable indeed to a continuous address ; but for windmg into a subject,-for indoctrinating a man, forgiving him^a fim grasp of first principles,-for elucidating the intricacies of details, -for adaptation of doctrine by expansion and contraction to the variety and peculiarities of mental calibre,-there never yet was a method so efficacious as the method of instniction by question and answer It imports into teaching the advantages without the attendant disadvantages of discussion. Difficulties^ axe ckaxed objections answered, the whole matter is sifted-looked at .dl round; and what a man learns in this way he knows well^ and remembers long. . , . j j xi With children there is 'of course no difficulty m, and mdeed there is an universally felt necessity for, using this mode of mstruction. I lii } iDatruc- as always sposiition, preaohiiig again and 11 groand- eannot be iuction to r, it muBt I to what certainly many are > all, must I copooities )U9 formal 5I1 a power- he problem lie sermon. > a solution oal iostruc- catechetioal lay in some ' emotion it for winding him a firm !s o£ details, iction to the er yet was a luestioQ and without the axe cleaxed, Doked at all ws welV and indeed there f instruction. .19 And where children can bo catechized in the presence of their elders these latter may loam a great deal which it is good for them to know. Still in a country mission, where there is usually but one service, this is often impossible, and indeed, where attainable, it is, so far as adults are concerned, but a make-shift, poorly sup- plying the lackmg elements in modern preaching. Happily, how- ever, it is possible to approach the adult understanding, directly, with systematic teaching. Bible classes are fortunately interesting. If a clergyman will take a portion of Scripture, and preparing himself by careful study, go through it verse by verse, avoiding no difficulty, questioning his class, encouraging them to state their difficulties, and tender their explanations, he will find them willing enough to learn. And when he has once inaugurated the practice he may vary the application of the method, eo as to convey what- ever instruction he may think needful. Instead of a book, for instance, he may take a subject; and, by a judicious arrangement of his questions and references, lead his class through it. He may exhibit a doctrine, or trace the growth of an institution. And over and above the greater fulness, clearness, and accuracy of knowledge which the method will impart, there will be this advan tage, that his hearers will be in a condition to follow with interest sermons of a more solid description than he could otherwise ven- ture to oflfer them. His discourses may become If «»™ inir our souls seared as with a hot iron. And yet the inevitable tendenoy of constant repetition is to pro dut this unconscious and mechanical performance of onr most llduties. The tendency is ineviUblo. ^^"noi^yj^^^^ result i»-6od forbid. I suppose that your experience wil give vrVnowlcdgo enough of the tendency of spiritual exere.se, todo- ^ La.« into forms. And I know ^ "-at your experience wd^ WU bow this deplorable issue may be averted ; *»» J™ ""J^^j^J secret prayer, and by aU the unuttored thoughts of the life whwh Z hid with Christ in Gcd, to replenish your lamps wifl. the "Uf gI^s Holy Spiri^wLioh alone can feed the flame of true dtolion. That we may assist one -f^-'^rtrautis « principal cause of our presonoo here. And I do '™ ^^^-'j^ few daysfellowship, maybe lifelong,-ayeeternal-m '*» '^"^ Lt there may be an outpouring of the Spirit upon "' i ^""•y^^ overflow the flame of the divine life may pass with lambent h„M Zm L* soul, and thatwe may be all one by «— -^ ^ ■miritual dft»-knit together in one communion and fellowship m rryli^rBody of Christ our Lord-that with brot^er^^v „d quickened spirituality, we may walk worthy »f '^^ ™^'^^^ wherLth we are eallcd-that we as a church may en^r mto he jo, of the Prophet's benediction : " Arise, shine, for thy i.igM » come, and the glory of the Lord is risen upon thee.