"f^. .V>^, <^^> ^ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) h A <ipJb :/. /!/. f/. ^ 1.0 I.I p lis IIIIIM 11-25 i 1.4 1.6 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 iV qv ^^ ^ #> ^<b N .% Ja ;^ CIHM Microfiche (IVIonographs) ICIVIH Collection de microfiches (monographles) Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notes / Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy --'vatlable for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the Ubual method of filming, are checked below. Coloured covers/ Couverture dc: couleur Covers damaged/ Couverture endommagee Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restauree et/ou pelliculee Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque Coloured maps/ Caites geographiques en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en ccjleur □ Bound with othe. inateriai/ Relio avec d'autres documents D D Tight bindir J may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La reliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsion le long de la marge interieure Blank leaves added during restoration .nay appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout^es lurs d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela etast possible, ces pages n'ont pas ete filmees. □ Additional comments:/ Commentates supplementaires; L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a et^ possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-^tre uniques du point de vue bibiiographique, qui peuvcnt modifier une image reproduite. ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la methode normale de f ilmage son! indiques ci-dessous. □ Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur □ Pages damaged/ Pages endommagees □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurees et/ou pellicul^s Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages decolorees, tachetees ou piquees □ Pages detached/ Pages detachees I I Showthrough/ Lx^. Transparence n Quality of print varies/ Qualite inegale de I'impression Continuous pagination/ Pagination continue D D D Includes index(es)/ Comprend un (des) index Title on header taken from:/ Le titre de Tent^te provient: Title page of issue/ Page de titre de la livraison Caption o* :.>sue/ Titre de depart de la livraison Masthead/ Generique (periodiques) de la livraison This ifem is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est filme au taux de reduction mdique cidessous. ^OX 14X 18X 12X 16X 20X 22X 26 X 30X }\ 24 X 28X 32 X u'il :et de vue B tion es The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: National Library of Canada The images aippearlng here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in keeping with the filming contract specifications. Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed beginning with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrr ted impression. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol — •► (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grace d la g^n^rosit^ de; Biblioth^que nationaie du Canada Les images suivantes ont 6t6 rgproduites avec le plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et de le nettetd de l'exemplaire film6, et en conformity tvec les conditions du contrat de filmage. Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en papier est imprimde sont film6s en commongant par le premier pht et en terminant soit par la dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires origiriaux sont film6s en commandant par la oremidre page qui comporte une empreinte d'imprsssion ou d'illustration et en terminant par la dernidre page qui comporte une telle empreinte. Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbole — »- signifie "A SUIVRE ", le symbole V signifie "FIN". Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Stre filmds d des taux de reduction diffdrents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Stre reproduit en un seul clich6, il est film6 A partir de I'angle Pup6rieur gauche, de gauche d droite. et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images nScessaire. Les didgrammes suivants illustrent la mSthode. □ 22X 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 V .in i f } f-^. / PUBLIC DEBATE — ON THE — <>« utiiiitii il ilf ^1 — BETWEEN T. H. DUNN, CHRISTADE LPHIAN,) - AND — N. -WASHIlTaTOlT, M. D., (WESLBYAIT METHODIST,) HELD IN. THE VILLAGE OF WATERLOO, ONT,, ON THE ^^//, ;///, S^/i, gth and loth of July^ 18^4^ ''^'''hrs'ol''''T"^"t^'^^^^'^''^'^'^^'^^'^^ ^^1^^''^' ^^-^'-W and lose ins ovvu soul; or what sliall a man give in e.voliau,<je for his soul?" — Matt. Hi., Hi. 1874 : PRINTED AT THE "oHRONIC'LE" OKFICK, KING STREET, WATERLOO. .* ST 7^ ^ PREFACE. .„-.rri~i7^:.-:;;-.;r:~.i;:: -,;•■',-' »hc .poke k.,, „ k„/,rX' „,: ^;:r:iT;:,T>^\"'- ''"°"' each speaker again occumed half «. v, *;'^f °g*«'^ fo"" half an hour, when audience. ^ ^""^ ''^°^° ^^ ^'t'^er Cnairman or It is hoped that the perusal of these pages will exhibit fn fl ^ • a clear light, the utter groundlessness of the 1 t i ,i ttMco T"" " nature, its irreconcilabilitv w,-fh c • mattiiaJiftie theory of man's IMMOKTALITY OF THE SoUL. ^ ' "^"^ ''"'^""^ '^^ *'"-■ v/ PUBLIC DEBATE — ON THE — IMMORTALITY of the SOUL. . rcHurrection." *'*^^ unconsciousness till the Affirmative, Xeoative, ..'_""■- T. H. DUNN, Esq. N. Washington, M.D. J^IRST NIGHT. H. F. J. Jackson, Esq., in the chair. - v-7 •'»i^^ VJUIU. bra ' *'H/'"rwr'S"^'^"*"f "mentality istCeS^^^ perfection of the sbr thatj;ilrit -*^'-'ty of _a P.o'feLorifrp:Ll'!l.'>-"e--'t -^ the tongJe tast;srthrn:;ves fLl'W^ t*'^*^- "^'''-- '^ — 4 — scripture .loos not moan .loath of tli. l.o.ly. "She that liveth in plersuro is iknd while she l.veth" " T „> soul that sinncth. it shall .lie." "In the .lay th.>u oatest thereof thou shalt surely die." A.lam's death was iinmo.liate, it was a <leath of life iii tlie 8.)iil. Because life .loes sDinetimes mean exUtmce, it docs not follow that it means nothing else ; in these i);.ssa,<.'.'s l[f,- an.l ,lnitl, cloarlv refer not to exiHtenre 'hut to opposite Matvx of a heiii;. which ontinncs to i-xU in either case lnstea.1 of showiu;,' that thought is a natur.d secretion of th.* hrain. phvsio- iogy shows that "overy yui „f the hrai.i has heeu found to he d.;str,.vcd in one instAiice or aiiothcr, wiiik; yet the in.lividuMls have not h.rn .lei.nvcd of ,„i„d or even afhictcl in their intellectual poworn." (ilallcr and Morgani.) Dr Aher- eroml.io gives a ca«e ..f a la ly who died suddouly a few hours after visitim/so,„e fnen. s, while in apparently go.,d liealth. Her l.rain, on .lisscction, ap'pcarcl healthy externally, hut when a thin section was cut away, a cavity wlis Lxpos..,l througli which a proho pas.-ied in evcTy .lircction with.iut resistance. The whole hemispheie was a great cyst full of s,)ft pultaceous matter completely .leconinosed " It cannot therefore he maintaine.l th.it the hrain is ntces.sarv to c..n..ciou.4ess or Uiougtit, liowever closely it may he connected with the manifestation of thoucht We cannot see without the eye, neither can we without the optic nerve, hut it is ■I lAv •"? "i"'^ '?'"^'' '"^''^ ■■'"'' "''■"•^■' ''^"'l tl'e «'i'»<'' <■'.!'> i"terior to the brain itself thinks an.l exists, a sep.arate entity. i>„v,-'^V*;i ^^^^' "' 'T'''^' <^""t'^»''«'l tl"it his opponent's argument that aomethiiiir behin.l the .n-ans .,f .sense was the perceiving entity pr.,ve.l to., much, for if it followed that man ha.l a sj.irit the pismire must have one too, since it also saw telt, &c. J,ut lie d.,l not conten.l against the existence of spirits, tlie angels were spirit beings. He .lidconteml that man had n.) sejiarahle spirit entity. "(Jo.l said to Hezokiah "het tuy house in or.ler, f..r thnn .shalt surely die. an.'l lu.t live''-- :."*! 'i 1 , ,,"' ""* ■'^'>'' " *''y '•"'•>' '^''■■^" ''i^'- ""'•' thou "shalt go to <dorv " or nitv •• hK' ^T' *" ;''"f •""'} ^''^'f "•' '''''" ^^•"'- '^' '''^y *''••"••«'' ^^'1 eter- nity hut t/iou Shalt surely die .an.l not live. I f Hezckiah was going to heaven he would have heen gla.l of it, hut he knew Letter. H. knew that (/,.?„ me.aut 1 ,! self, the whole man. The Dr. contended for a separate spirit entity, an immortal spirit There were a great many spirits mentione.l in scripture.' a foul spirit, a broken spirit &.C. , there were ;.! ditlerent spirits spoken ..f as being in man, which of then, di.l his opponent intend to tak as the immortal spirit r The law was that that whic smno, whetheryou ca 1 it man or soul, should .lie, yet his opponent woul.l have It that A.lam carried about with him for !).30 years a .lead spirit in a living body.- I)n. W.\.^tun-.;ton- proved by rofereiu^c to Creek .lictionary that ln,>ni,a translate.l ,s/,tr./ ha.l various meanings : 1st, primary meaning, air or breath "nd human sou , 3r.l the rational soul or reas.ming power, ^th, that whS fc'els thinks, wills or desires, oth, the temper or .lis])OMtion, (ith, the Holy (Ihost 7th' the Divine energy or inlluence, 8th, the min.l pro.luced in Christians, <Jth the Imng creature. P,uclu',^ho translated .pint, has similar ren.lerings. Hence Mr Dunn s witticisms about spirits fall pointless. Because the pri.muy meanincr of where it l.stcth-.so is every one born .d the .jHrit:' Win.l an.l spirit are both /mruma in original. Hence the opposite argument was foun.le.l ,in a mere con- founding of <liverse meaning of the same ten,,. Zachariah refer, ing to the ereation 1- eh., 1 says the Lord formed the spirit ot man which is in him " That spirit IS translated 'mind," Prov. !) 11 "A fo.d „tt.,reth all his mind," Kz. 11, o Ez --• •^-' ^.■'-ii; J.-'O. Also ren.lered "un.lerstan.ling." Hence the mi,/,/ or innlrr- ■4a,uh,i{, IS the spirit whicli (lod forme.l in man at creation. He challenged his opponent to controvert this proof that the spirit is an entity in man. 1 Cor 2 m..7" Ti "'.'".' •^"°^^etli tl'e things of man, save the spirit of man which is in ^ i' M „ .^,1^'"* ^■'"'"■' '"''^ ^^'' ''i^'"* '^ '" """1- «''i»ne chapter, 1(1 v. The spirit teacheth all things. Hence to the spirit is attributed all our mental lowers. As t.i the separability of the spirit or thinking entity from tne body, lie cited the ease I T* not kill it' •< wZZh V- T'y *^^ animal life, how ia it that mon can- own sou ■•-.Ma?t To-'o,!^ 'So^ P^^^l^ '/ ^^ «<»- the whol. world and lose'h^ whole world? ''Their9Lntiri.o,lv.f^ one «oul ,8 of more value than the God who gave ifiKcoles •* - That ^1^*" '•"'.* T '' ^"'^ "'"^ *'"' ^f""* *" to (}o.l. Acts 7, 53 Steuh."; Hav« '?! ' . r' 'P'"* ''■"'' '"" '"''t"'"" ^^ •^"''t »>»* SECOND NIGHT. H. F. J. Jackson, Esq., in the chair. the earnTr T„ Vh<. " "e^e did Job s e,;o wait till the Redeemer stands upon Ce"4T. oripZr. '^'"" "" "■" »•""'? "f ""> «■'« !.=««». in the lis.r.tiv, hi. J';,;,;^;" «°'»"""'^»'' >"• -pi"' to 'he F,.th,r h. w.l.d h,„ .„ p„„,„ be absuTl %'u kn^wrmaa ZtloZ'^T^f^'^h *'^\-™P-i«"» would b. «s in.t..a «, o'.r.i'^/S™.?^!;: 'X?<,intli;;r^Str;lt& — 6— . ami spirits. In answer to Elijah's i)rayor the uhil.l's soul camo back and re^n- torc.l the Iwjly. Did it come from nonentity ? The soul nnist have hcen al)sent else It would have to be created, therefore a soul did exist separate from the body 1 u * 1 ^'*''* '" * similar discussion to the present between the Pharisees and Saaduceea, and avowed himself ii Pharisee and a son of a Pharisee. If Paul were hoi to-night, couhl there be a doubt as to which side he would espouse? t. 1 1" ''^''"'^' *^'®" appealed to to decide Jietweon tho same two sects, showed the Sailduoec 8 by a convincing argument from Moses himself that thev were wrong. ' Ood is not the God of tho dead but of the living. Were Abraham, Isaac and .Jacob dead, or were they living? If they wore nothing and nowhere, God is God of nothing, but still not God of the dca<l. Hut if they still lived in another stato of existence, us tliiH plainly implies, what liecomts of the proposition that man tails into uiicoaaciouaisess and noii exi.stenco at death? Tho proposition and the scripture evnlently cannot both be true. Mr. Dl'nn said sinil or p.-nulK' is ecpiivalent to the whole man, or the life, or IS used with the retlexive pronoun. All Hesh did not mean man when God threatened to destroy all flesh, it iuclnded man and beast. Ps. 14th. .Mans thoughts peri-sb. The dead praise not the Lord. Ho de- . nianded that these texts be met. As to the Sadducues, angels are spirits, and the other thing the S:i,ldueees denied was tho resurrection, .lesus never referred to a separate entity in nun. Paul sai.l that which is to be raised must tir.st die. If so, then unless we die, wo cannot be raised, but tlic orthodox <lo not expect •leath. tliey expect to live on continuously, how then do they hoijc for a resur- rection ? •'1 In reference to "tho God of the living." Go<l speaks of thing.s to come as though tliey Wcm'c, as lu case of his promises to Abraham, and as Abraham will live again, he speaks of liiiu as living. He lives in the future. We are absent from the body, we from owe one body, or how many we's ? Cited Parkhurst that )ii'j>lievh does not necessarily mean a soul. Job wished he hail died so as to be at rest. He speaks of sleeping in the dust, of l)eing as though he had not been, having been carne.l to the grave. This imust mean total uncon- sciousness, " being as though he had not been." P.salmist siiys like sheep we are laid m the grave. The soul is under sentence of death, and giKS to du.st Sons of men are boasts, that which befalleth the one befalleth the other, as one dieth, so dieth the other. There is no thought nor work in tlie grave. The dciul know not anything. The soul died and the dead know not .iiiything, thercfora m'ui goes into a state of unconsciousness at death. Lazarus, tho whole being who was dead cai/n' forth, not an inimortal soul coming down fiom heaven to reanimate him. All that ate in tho I'nives shall como forth, not from heaven or hell, but from the i,'ravr.s. Rut the common bellf 18 that they will come from heaven and hell, which may be liyuin-book theokx'v but is not in the Bible. ~ j cJi Dr. WAsui.NCiTON. In reply to tlie text, "The dead praise not the Lord," t.e would ask Mr. Dunn to read the rest of the text, and see whither tho dilficultv wouhl not disappear. The Psahuist goes on to s.ay, but 'V/v will praise the I ord fonvermore. But Mr. Dunn wanted to snatch a -rcat link out of the endless chain of this eyermoro, in order to get thousands of years of unconsciousness or non-existence smuggled into it. , Mr. Dunn denies that a spirit exists as an entity in man, but scripture says God formed the spint in man. What is th.it but an entity ? Tho Psalmist hopes to walk //(roH(//t the valley of death, and to be sustained in doing so. H he is unconscious, how is he to walk or to need siistenanco. When the heart and flesh fail, ttod 18 to be his strength and portion forever. The soul is redeemed, the body ?«?« be aft«r death. Man docs pass orf this teiupor.il stage like the beast, »nd he may be laid in the grave. Personal pronouns are applied to the body or to the soul, or to the whole man. j> grave If the soul has been redeemed from the power of the grave, how can the e have power over it ? The thoughts of man perish frequently in this life, — 7-. but he Bayn tl.ey will con.e ,?, u L^ W w. 1"^ '7.'" *^.^>' '^'«^ *°««t'''^' ^;.tl.er. .sue., .e the ...../it., ".to^ whlWel£c*^o7i?rCnTS |"K. It is the /.uf, that SVl^ a «« 1 t ^.^r^ r""''' ''^ '^' •""'« «» I"-' '^h^ the .sa.ntH n.,s,, l,„t ue have m, Zof t^^^^^^ ","* *»•« •"""''• «o,lie« of *^..l,.e« w.ll h,.i.,^, the H«i,.t8 w.t 1. h ,u B t he i« t '"" '''■•;1'' ^''"•'^<- ^ ''^" !'« a. J\:; i:i;',"^'r^ itte;:^:;;;;::^!;:;^^ 'i::;!^"^"^' ^' ^'^' •* '« -■•• >- «.--* cnu.e l;.oof that the spirit exi.te^. J rat fhtrthe b^^^^ T'" • '** '"'* *!'*« '' thc.u «oNv«st ... ,„.t .ii.ickene.l cxcei.t it , i! *i ^ ' . ?^'"- ^""" ^f*''' that which o' wheat .lie? Doe!, .,ot 1 e i' ^^ ^^ ?/ .t*^" ''"VV" *''• • ^^■''"' -'oesthogn^u k.,o-.ra th.,t. an.! the lig,,,.o isa excclkU il, "^ f i? "'''''• ^'^'-"'y f"'""''- nn.l the resurreetioi.. The l.fe it.^ot ext , a ',^. .''\1-*''*' *'"*= <Ioct.i,.e of .leath the .fe .a the ..nv,. grai... Jt Vve, .lies ^w ,n "' ','* ^'T' «V ^'''^^ ^''« «""'- Hl^e •Ml-. Dmu. had l.roiiuht ....this l,e utif , .!!' i '^ *^'' external ho.ly .loes. Sinee 4e faet,s of the .le.lth ../ the'; iy '^'f^f^Sn th^ '\'''^''T\^^^' *" '•■''>™-'>^« THIRD NIGHT. H. F. J. Jackson, Esq., iu the chair. He rel^-iSua/;.";:; pro.,r!:n,;;.^::.iv:f.,^!?* ;r'^M'l,"7 "' ^''« '"^'-•'"^ y«t. '••et. met. JJe, „„ thL contrary cl m 1 , ' ^'•'"' /'^^ n..ue ..f then, had yet t-. the ailirn.ativ... The w ','l \m.l o ' ^'''''Y*;"'"' '"" *'"^ a.-un.ents opi oi^e.l ar;;ue.mnu,.tali,y fon. the M'o rd i setf \^ V Jf "">"T', ''"'^ " ^^'''^ ""^'^i'- *<• i-iun t.H hreath. that «as wharreturne.l '' "'"''' '"•"'^'■■'^ ''>' '^^•''"«- ^^'^ -re niitS:;::;, ;'.i;:';:l= rVo/ t-rr'^ "^-^' -'-- ^'^-^ i~ 1-'; 1 Kiags. 10, -,; ^Nvses whShe V, S' it ' ^ {^^'T' ^'K'''-' ^ '^''""'^J' :^"- was restored bv foo.l or watei ^^ ^"'' *" ^''^^''^ ''^^* indivi.h.als and j.'.u^-nii:':^^^ ,Sr 'saSrf;;^ •^;;?f^'"'r ^''^v^" "°* ^^ ^^^^^'^'^ - come with hi.a. The rod whTc'h 'hmd.T'e , p/; n '^'i"' *? '-■"'"^'' """^ ^^'^"'"'fe' *•' ■K'^us. An i.an.orta,! so.il c. Id ,uit .-^L f , '7''\'", ^^"^ ''''^^^y "^ l>'-^'*th wa« A..a... wa.s J)30 ye.r.s dyi, g an , X^ t theT^^ .]..^th heeause ,t co..hl not .Ho of .mmo,jtaI souls hovering ,Jvt a X Afield ' '"'■''' '^^'^ '""^* ^*^ thou«audB a man can bask ira God's fav^or w Shout tW^ ', "'^ "^*""' "-^^ ^" 'insistent. If rectum? '*''°'^ wituout the body, where .s the use of a retur. UNN repuiliateil Voltaire as autliority, and denied having so much ns laberts. »Mr Dunn did not agruu with Voltaire. He believed in Go 1 — 8 — Dr. Wahhinoto.V quoted from lloT>ert8' Twelve Lecturet to show the actual belief of ChristailclphianH resnocting man's Htate after death. Roberts <Utin«ii life as moaning existonco, and as being the result of functional perfection of the bodily organs, and death is the opposite of life, ami is the result of the cusaa- tion of these functions. At death man goes where ho was before ho was born, he becomes mn-exutent, as though ha never hail been. This view lloberts ho d in common with Vr)ltaire, from whom, indeed, he had borrowed that and other articles of his creed. , ^ t i.. o i The Hobrotv word wplii-sh, previouiily referred to, means; Ist, breath, .iud, intalligenee, Srd, rational soul, fiut the arguments of Mr. Dunn, are based on confusion of these me;iniri:i;s. Translations of Hcripture by methods adopted by Mr. Dunn, would make unmeaning nonsense. The body can be killed, the soul cannot. I-et him come to the point an<l tell what that soul is whioh cannot bo killeil by those who can kill the body. Text •bout the value of the soul must be mot also. If bodily life is meant, the com pari.son with the whole world would be riiliculous. Moses was buried in the landofMoab, how did he appear to the Apostles if ho was nonexistent. Mr. Dunn says it was a vision. But his disciples saw it after they awoxe out of sleep, if it was a vision thoy would have seen it while they slept. This fact was fatal to Mr. Dunn's L-tborod but futile attempt to explain away so formidable a ijassage. As to r,ho roaurrootiou, Paul argues that the resurrection depended on C!hnst s resurrection. But Dunn says whether CJhrist is risen or not, we perish anyway. But ho has risen, and Paul says wo are not purinhed. Why did not Christ cor- rect his disciples in their errors about spirits, if they were wrong? The patriarchs, it seems, wore blotted out of existence, but Christ taught his hearers that they were living, which is right ? Mu. Dn read even Roberts. ».Mr Dunn aid not agr and the Bible. He holds that spirit had many meanings. ^.^ ■'■■"■ ^ He (lid not deny that man was rational. Man cannot dejtroy the life hiil with God, God can kill that, but man can kill the body. The transfiguration was a vision like Nebuchadnezzar'c vision of tlie image. It is not said that) Moses' loul UA8 there, or Elijah's. It is the resurrection of ti.e dead that is tbe hope of the C'hristian. The sleepers and dea<l in Christ were to be rewarded by his com- ing. The natural man is Hrat, afterwards the spiritual man, henuo the lirst could not be part spirit, p.irt matter. Man is wholly mort il, and m')rtal puts on im- mortality, but at the resurrection then shall death be swallowed up in victory. Then man sees Jehovah's glory. He went on to speak ot the grandeur of Christ's reign upon the earth. Rav. 1'), 15, proves that the time of the dead only comes after 7th angel sounds at jud^^'.iient. "All that aro iu the graves are to come forth to judgment.' The SadducBos took only the Pentateuch. Hence Jesus proved the resur- rection from Mosos only. He did not prove that there was an immortal soul. God spoke of his p irpose, when he called himself the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He was their God in reference to his puipose to raise them up at the last day. The iaterm..diate state is a blank in So-riptuie, God will not bring the rightijous and wicked to judgment from heaven and hell, but will wako them from sleep. David has not ascended into h..aven. David has been a long time in the shadow of death, aud in still not in heaven, but unconscious in the dust like his fatheis. Dr. WASUiNaroN said pmche is never applied to future life ; the word is zoe iu every instance. The life of the body, the animal life simply is pswke in the original, but that of the soul in reference to its future is always zoe, an entirely different word. The attempt to make a point by confounding two essentially different words and things evinced either gross ignorance or great presumption. This disposes of the attempted explanations. The lift of Jesus, he says, was committed to God's keeping ; but by the hy- pothesis this life at death is nothing, hence he commends nothing to His keeping. — — S;^SV;N,';7!t;;y::,;r'^iI,!;'''v' y^ '«"?'- »..,,„,eh...i it in. the ,.y Paul ahout tl.; k..r,u.l or'or n'^^Hif hi;;^;^!^^^^^^^^^ *'' barmonizo tho illuHtrat.on „f of J w:!:;;,!;:i;:iirLS';iS:;tt:!tri"';'^ '^^^'i^'"^ *•■" •• « turn y«. for why will v o^'^ H, t ,T ^ ^^W"^ ^""" ""' ' "''"'"" Ve. .>o r„aHona..lv oxhortoh^ tt^ inlV'l'e'; irli^'^t'^'" "'""■' ""' ""^ ^•''" "'- coivaMe. vvhon fairly h!,k;,l into ' ""* '""' '"'"'""-■'' ' ^^'^ l'yi"'tlu.Hi« i, i„cou- wholo ««ntenc... l.oc^.lL, ' t woZ s ,o hi, ''"'7, """'"^ ''« '""' ""* reml the example, comp^rin^ th^ o.nnor«l nf .r"' \\" ^T">^'' '" ''^•-•''•'^"'ia«t«''. for of matcrialisnl, I,„t they SE ,1 ro .II f*"". '"'"'*• V" ''' *'"■"'"* "t"-""*?''"''! "the Hpirit of n,nn yoot^/ ^"ni '• [r„ citir„f r'^'li^'l^'^ *^"'""*''" .listinction. who wan brought f.^om the'Sworld^'^uSo .l'^^!?? ';i ts^^r'''^ "' '"•""«•• i.ion^ ; j^i;::':S,:^S:;t th 'i:::?"'-""'^ r^''-^^- —1-% the personal the «pi?it« of just me, m dfnerl t ^ ' "'"'''^ fu"^"!' ''-^ 1"''««"8''« «I'«"king of FOURTH NIGHT. Rev. p. W. Tuehk in tlu. cl liair. comparing its value to the whole worl'l r«"<l-Te.l soul /,/, ,» the passage to the new heart and the newspiriVto L .^vp^ fn T ' T'l^ "'/,'""' *^^'« ^^f'^'^ u.to their own land. As to -souls un.W H.I.olf --If' '^''"' *''°>' '*''*^ ««*''*^'-<"' ...ood wiuoh h., h^n kiiSi a^';:c:i!:'!:;.ft ^S'theJ:^' ^^■^^'^ ^""'^ «^ «-^ -^> in the pit could not praTse tfe Lord ''"^ ""' '"'''' *" ^^''^ '"-''"•'"'^'^ tl'"^^ That^war'an^Eg^S^ide: "'S^fL??,"*"" '^'^°'^* ^^'^ pre-existence of souls. Was Solomon rlrm,i;^'i 1 «e"tlemau mean to maintain it? when'TitingThc 1 \Te? "£?, fySed' 'wT T"^ "' f," ^-.'-^tes. an,l sober upward. " He did n-.t sav thaf t LI " '"'"'''' *^* 'I^'"*^ "^ 'n'-*" that -octh came down. Sa^l di I , oL k God ornd^r* '>,"''' '* ^T'"^' '^"'"'^ "1° "»* Ood sent him he broke Ss oL I w wWl, """'^ ' ¥ P"/^'^ *° ^ ^'t'^h' ■''"'1 if imto witches should be slf^nTb^wSfi'"'"'"*"'*^'^ .*^.''^* *^««« ^^ho sought As to heathen nationrbelievin^ iS inTmolf S'»?^^''?,e^Pl'^ "ed by clairvoyan^ce. the heathen for proof Jesus brouX 1^ ^'"^^ "1".'?'^'^ ^^^ ''^^^ "^ g°'"g *" gospel. The wo^rld y wisdom kn!w JJt God"^Th'^'*^ Vl^' through "the -A^hat Saul died^ s.SaiaZu^lSt.t ^l^^^ t^^^^ 18. ll-Ft-n^S^ist^^^^^^^^ ^^«I-<^ - belief. Lute p.s£f^irK.-^r:i£S^;;--Se^s.s^tt^^ — 10 — And he looked forward to the resurrection when he should be reunited to the body. Solomon had reasoned deeply with himself on the great problems of life and death, and good and evil, but at last he cleared up his doubts in his last re- marks that when the "silver cord should be loosed, the body should return to dust and the spirit to God who gave it." Hence it was misusing Scripture to take his musings as doctrinal proof when his conclusion a little further on was exactly the reverse. If soul must be held to mean life, what does David mean when he sayo the living shall praise the Lord for evermore. He that believeth hath everlasting life. How can it be everlasting if thousands of years are to come out of it? God breathed something into man, that thing must therefore be separable from him. That it is so separable is the plain teaching of scripture, which always refer to man as coQtinuing to exie* after the body dies, Wh at prompted the heathens to believe in immortality, if there is not a principle, a longing for it implanted within them? The case of the thief's prayer on the cross and the Saviour's answer— "To- day thou shalt be with me m Paradise," showed that the dead are conscious, and their reward is immediate, in part at least. Mr. Dvnn said his opponent's gospel was that of witches. He ridiculed it as a creed of superstition and necromancy. The soul of Abel cried from under the ground or altar on which he was sacrificed. The souls under the altar do live in the future and will reign with Christ a thousand years. If the body here is the soul's house, then there is another house in the heavens, and there will be a third house at the resurrection. Dr. Washington says the soul that sinneth it sluiU die, and then that it shall not die. He quoted a number of passages where souls are said to be slain with the sword. This is the way souls died. Beasts' souls (Num. 31, 28) were slain. Facts prove that mind depends on functional perfection of bodily organs. Now matter has more power than spirit. Pressure on brain causes cessation of thought, derangements of functions cause lunacy. Paul Iioped for eternal life, showing that he had not got it in fact, else he would not have hoped for it. The wages of sin is death, the gift of God is eternal life, given at the last day, but not sooner, eternal life is in the Son, he that hath the son hath eternal life, that is in reversion, or the promise of it. It is Claimed that Jesus and the thief went to Paradise up in heaven some- where the same day. But the thief's prayer was that he should be remembered when He came to his kingdom, not we»t but came. When would that be? when he came into his kingdom and set uj. that kingdom on the earth. To this all who waited for his appearing looked, and for his coming they hoped. Dr. Washington. The Saviour's answer is the basis of our belief, not the thief's prayer. To-day shalt thou be with me in Paradise. The brain is the me- dium through which the mmd works, and of course if the medium is deranged, the mind's working is interfered with. He says the wages of sin is death. But there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ. Now if, as Mr. Dunn says, the death of the body is the wages of sin, then no Christian should die ; but all die, therefore the death spoken of must mean something else. (ThefoUoieing is the conclusion of Hm Dr.' a speech, verbatim.) My opponent has undertaken to^o»ethat man is unconscious between death and the resurrection. To do this he must reconcile the plain meaning of God's Word irith his theory. He calls or. mo for proof. T nae.il not prove anj'thing. My duty is simply to point out the fallacies that underlie his attempts at proof. He says that man immediately after death, is as though he had not been, is where he was before being born, is therefore non-existent, is nowhere and is nUhimj. This is his theory, in plain language, not an inference from it. but his own statement. Now will the audience hold firmly before tUeir minds this proposition of the Luke — 11 — 23T"'?PattHnKT'1f "^'°?°' ^^"« ^« °°'°P'^'-« it with scripture . • *" , "**?" ii.to ttiy tauds I commend mv sinrit " For "anir^-' !^, uent reails "life-principle. " We cive him thp Ln«fif ^f +j ° -?>?"* ^^ "PP'^' death the life principle went wher^ft w^ hpfnr t ^ ^l"' ^¥ '"°'"^"* ^^t^'' nothingness, The pWge wSd thfn Te^l < fefc !,Tf)^'l ^T^' ^^"* *° my NON-EXISTENCE, my nothing. " ' ' *° ^^^ ^*"'^'' ^ commend mean'inS nonrnse? ^fchXr ZZnf Tl'"''' "°^H ^^^^ "**^-'l «-^ - squarely with th 8 text ami fli^^f^^P^"?"* *" reconcile his theory fairly and mikes thelttempt ' ^ ^^ *^'' *"^'""'^ *" ^''^'^^ ^^^ squirm when he partet&ro*ri'e%^olK3tf^^^^ "^ *^^ -*^i"«-« of the de- come^f^rom?' ^hThfe^dpleTarnt'^P-^^^' 'T'^ ^^'^^'« '"'^ '^' ^Pi^* from nothing, nothng remained That?«; *"^V°'^ ^pv^here, if it took nothing But perhaps he createdT stSrit for tiwt ® mathematics an<l good common sense therefore nVher S " Cthe text says^HER .J rit"' '\7''^ °°' ''''''"'' «P^"*' meaning that it was there before Rnt „T. F- ' \\ *'^° ^^^^ ''ame again, »meag.m, il could not h.v. beernon.«,Ts"Dt l%e F™ Tl'' ""-WS breathing of life, butthe same soul that had departed"^ It h^f7n?*T * °''^.-°' ^:ss '}^ss^ :r teCT '^^^^i^-^""^s r n: NOTHmaNOTHmSES WifmJ™^ ^f"'''^^' «''"'^ "^^'-OUT OF life-principle come £ck into pii?fL?/'"* ^''^ * '"'^y °^ "'''^'^"'8 ^i« non-existent audL.ce t'hatZ prXos"ionSrt\:\"^ ""^' '' ''' ^ ^ ?"* '' »« t*"- gans.^l^eZrmLtTli'be int?T'^?*^ '^ *.^°"^''* "^^'^-t l^'-"- t^^-^ ^^'-^ily or- fvol^ed TriSureSvsdifft^^^^^ T'^'''^ ''''^''' ^^'^' tl'°"«ht be be killed as they were " "^ '"^°" '^'"'^ **'"'" fellow-servants should f *'th!\^"'^ completely this upsets all his hypotheses felloi-slvantsTeryetloblkSy"'^^ '^'""^^*^-' ^^ -- <>' t'^- ten SLTlCS^S' *'^' "^" ^^^^'^^ «'^^- ^^-^f"- *^- — <i they we^eVereTLX^Ltn!r '''**^' ^'^'^ resurrection, the dead are as nbW cried wThraSe" What"-' Tn^r:?^ •^"^"''^y' things crying with a loud voice ' Wh v l^! T \ 1^ "'"^-entities-a sum of no- 'urtSer. (hef are advised toZ't fo7a^lu^ re^on '^Phiff^f^ '"''"^*''"''" ^"* " lui u iiMie season. Ihink of unconscious uon- — 12 — entities resting or being told to rest, to be patient for a little while till tlie rest of tbeir brethren had joined them in the shades of non-existence. Need I point out any further "how the hypothesis of my opponent heaps one monstrous absurdity on another, till sober language fails to characterize its utter folly. But further, 1 Peter, 3, 19, 20. "Christ preached to the spirits in ('rison, which were disobedient in tl^ days of Noah." Will my opponent face tlie music and tell this audience how in accordance with his theory Christ preached to beings that had gone out of existence, that were not, over 2,000 years before. We would feel thankful for a clear exposition of this point. Turn we now to a statement of Christ himself recorded in Luke 10, 19 to 31. The beggar died, and thiit was the last of him as a conscious being, according to my opponent. But Christ says "he" — the beggar, that is — was carried by angels into Abraham's bosom. What did they carry? Was it the l)ody covered with sores? According to Dunn there was nothing else to carry, the conscious thing had been blotted out of existence, a lump of clay covered with horrid sores was left. Did they carry that? Does any sane man say they carried that into Abra- ham's bosom? They carried h'wi, and whatever the ego of Lazarus was, that was what they took. But the rich man aiso died, and to avoid all disputes about his body, we are told he v/as buried. He too became non-existent of course, and that ought to be the last of him till after the resurrection. But no — -'in hell he lifted up his eyes." What 1 a non-entity lifted up his eyes, "being in torments," and yet un- conscious of them, existence gone, the whole being blotted out, the rich man was where he had been before he was bom, and yet he lifted up his eyes in torment ! ! "And he cried smd said^Ara these the acts of the unconscious dead, "cri/ing and Kar/ing,'' "Father Ahraham." What a simpleton this rich man must have been. Did he not know that Father Abraham was not in being for th? last 2,000 years, and yet he cried to him, but I suppose being a non-entity himself, the rich man could not be expected to know anything. We are told that the dead know not anything, and it seems this dead man did not know much of the gospel according to Dunn. " Have mercy on me," that is, let Abraham who is nothing have mercy on me who am nothing! "and send Lazarus," here comes the other non-enfittj. "I am tormented in this flame." Dunn wanted an instance of the conscious ego, the I, conscious after death and before resurrection. Is he satisfied with this specimen? Can non-existence be tormented? Can unconsciousness suffer pain?. But further on memori/ and reason are ascribed to this dead man, who had been buried. Son remember, and Lazarus is comforted. How is be comforted if he is unconscious cr non-existent? Will Mr. Dunn explain? Will he be kind enough to show this audiance how this conversation between a brace of non-entities is even conceivable, on his hypothesis? "I have five brethren," here is the very personal identity of the rich man established. I'he ego is clear here, the same individual whost; five l)rethren yet live in wickedness on earth is pleading that a messenger be sent to them from the dead. Why ask such a thing, if there were no consciousness in the dead ? How should a messenger from unconsciousness re'-'^al anything ? If the interme- diate state be a blank, the very request of the rich maH is conceived in unutter- able folly. But Father Abraham dois wit toli him so, which he naturally would have done, if he had been a good Christadjlphian, he pleaded that Moses and the pro- phets were sufficient, "if they hear not them, neithei will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead." And so I say, if the citations I have given from Moses and the prophets, from Christ and the Apostles, are not sufficient to overturn in the mind of every think- ing person lU ihisaudieuue the iiutiun of uuuousciousuess between death mud the resurrection, "neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead." Now let my opponent come up to the work and square his doctrine with these passages if he dare. — 1.3 — FIFTH NIGHT. H. F. J. Jackson, Esq., in the chair. him.'b;t ?o'Ts e^fitS '&*: werJ^JuutiS'. 'Y' '^'"'"^ ^^ '^^^ ^'^^^ ^-» are they when they go out If aEw- "'''' ^"'^""« '"*" '"''"• "«'t^>er it is parabolical, an.l if ?a nart of thf n ^""^ '^P'-^nt^ f'i« New Jerusalem, ''VVithoutapamfrspake^hJnot.ijH''**'^^^ t P'"*^»'i'=»>. «o is the whole of being in doctrine aEractice an I„S?"'. f^T. "'T''^ *^« Pharisee, of do™. a|d n.^ions are"!^^^^^^^^^^ I« Parables. king- the Judean kingdom He triop.l ih^ Kiat '^^ uaniel ^, 41. The rich man is departure from Eg^pt to the tfme of Chri«T °J ,'K '^"'^r.° '^"W''"™' ^'•«'° t^e whole house of Israel is renrese^ed a« , l?,' '^ "''T':!'^ ^l""^ ^^^^''^^ *'"** t^e wastt'a'f?;^he?veVVh?ao&^ »--»>- had ovei the Greek Srich min WrI fK V *u' 7*' *^^ advantage the Jew was the Gentiles! the aliens thprln),^ *^ •*^'i*^, of everything. The poor maa die as he receiv"; Chril Ta?;oTr^^^ ^r^ ««»*''« *>"« *° first. -^uopoor manniecl first, because he received dhrist peop?s'uSeSeItTv '"whS '"' ^"^^ ■J^rnn.lem was destroyed, and the .WtheHaltorRuSa, SriarnVp"utra'"The''r:nn" '^^'^ ''"^ P'^^^^^ apostles and messengers nto Al r»i„l' i 7,. ^^"t'lea were carried by preached unto them^ Abrahams bosom, that is, when the Gospel wai the h^lrT^tKTws'^•^ThVthl^^^^^^^ Tl' "'•';•*'' ^""T ^" "PP«"-* t»>'«>"gh point, but it iiXrnrdiffer«no« i.^ ^^^*«'n.«nt '8 a parable o. not is a disputed pothesis. ThTSch man U saw ;« bav'" rT ',' !^"u*"T ^^**' *'» ^»»« «??"««*« ^y- Ut merely in oJ^tivTty Our S-Jvio,?r t '^' ^'* *»^1 J«^i«»^ P««Ple is not dead, intermediate staL le cSnc^erprecLri^Tth"ir" ""'" ^^'^ ''^.^^"^ '" *« poor man is carried where ^TtdiSt' v^lSd ^^intTpaVadise"^ *'^" '""^ gr.vr!}>;£!,2^S:rsf sa hi.^=;?£;:^^,. and by 99 per cent, of hfslolhiVe' ' e^'v^ n^e t m^n tSiTht?'",'' '^ ''^^'^• ous. Paul says, "For me to Hvp i« Pi.^foT !' *".™.^*" that the dead are consci- depart and be'with Chnst whS ^L f!vr bettt ' " " '"'"' ""'' ^'''''' ""^ "'» enio, oSl'n aSrseteT^The'^i*' '""'^ How could anything unconsciou. departure tl at haYd "He dfd not?,^'.*?^"' ndi.ulmis. "The time of my Christ. "The sSts of iust men n,aT * *? ^f^^'^ '"*? unconsciousness, but Z anything be perfected bv bWH.^ made perfect, " must have been entities, could whW^heEhekieCwtsi^ F^^^ •=°"''^ not 'decide could be either in or outTf the bod v p ^ ^' ""•* "^ *^^ '^"'^y- Therefore a man ^^-^^^^rnent.1.^'^^^^^^ times in th. not/nraiTifn:: tni^rx^^^^^^^ or blot again out of existent! f^I. ' ■ , ^'^^ J"<*8« *°*1 ^rown with glory anriihiIatldbeT„;«.*Tll%*^:4™ deeds and the cnmi d? spirit to God. "' n - npture aays rco Dody leturus to dust and th« -pint" Te T^eS^d'lJo thVS *" ?'V^ '""VJ'^ » '^ «P'"'' °"^ °>"«t be . ■ buried, but 1483 years aftenvaT^-.: Z«"^Phath'8 son. Moses died and was to harmonize that^S WsTj^oth;. ^^^'"''^ '«'""• ^' '=^*"«"««'l »»" «PP°°e°» — U — Me. Dunn wanted to know how much more power it would take to recrpa+* an n.telJ,ge,.ce than to create it the tiret tin.e? God can preserve the i'LS and recreate It. He summed up the argument. Man is ^a u'Jty not dup x^ The e s but one man. my opponent ciamis two men, a body n-an "n 1 a sS' ^.ni^l'iv! "^ that man wr. 8 mortal, not part mortal and part sp ritual ^ He denied having said that man is nowhere. Th<- spirit is not man s but rn,P« t'\"T'y, ", '^f\^ °?.* \Y ?y "^l^"''^''* '^y' God^cannot raise he lead ^'The wicked shall not be " If the rational soul be immortal it couM not become in! sane the mind is therefore not immortal. The dead know not anythinT The m ml 18 subject to the laws of matter. The intermediate state is entirely mnored All reward 8 are referred to the resurrection. The oppo.site iLtrS punisies and rewards man before the Assize, according to Josephus, but S; accord nfto the scriptures. Eternal life is the gift of GoS. The |ift cloes not belong to^th: old Souls could be torn in pieces, eaten by lions, Ac. If the inteimediate state be a hnahty, how could Jesus speak to the spirit; in prison? My rponent £« mort'Ll tv TcSl'S "S*^" f'^'-^T T''"'' ^^'^ ^'^ ^' will fnveTwIth im mortality. I challenge him to make choice. Had cited numerous instances of spirit coming into persons after being refreshed with water, *c He denied being a Materialist, believed that those who put on Christ will receve immortal ity when Christ returns to the earth. He then enlarged uponThrTst'nocond coming when he w. uld reign as a personal monarch "upon the earth and ex- pounded at some length ihe views of the Christadelphians upon this point f ■ Dr. Washington disputed thataHa?«o means to return it means tn H^narf or separate from. But on the hypothesis of the essentialun'ity of mai there notuing to separate. Referred to Greek Lexicon for proof. If man is a unitv and anything is superadded there is something more than unity Tthereh no entity in man, how does the spirit know the thines of man f n rir.nr.if ,o \- the Dr. referred to the follo^i^ng texts which hXudSd and appffduS the discussion most 01 which are noticed in our report. Gen. 1 26^ 27 Gen 2 7. "breath of hves" (Heb.) 1 Kings 17, 21, 22; 2 Kings, 2. T; utSs^: ^'"- ^' .n ^^l^' ^J''''''' ^'-I^^a*'^ ,of Moses and hfs appearance on Mt. Tabor 1483 vears after; Matt, xyii, 1 to 9 inclusive, also Mark ixf 1 to 8, Luke ix, 27^38 ar+ If^^'^''^' ''''''"'' ,^\-^"nging up Samuel after being dead 6 years bv the art of necromancy Job xiv. 22, xix, 26. Psalms xxx. 3, 31. 3. 23, 4 Ixxiif 24 • 25.126. cxvii, 16 xhx, 8. 1£. David on the loss of hisxhil 1, 2 Samuel x i' tt' I w. 1 go to him but he will not return to me. Then the chil must be some where not annihilated. Prov. xii, 28 xvi, 18, xvi, 32, Eccles. viii, 8, iii, 21 "r? Is' "•nAT£".™f*^*''®'P'"*o^Jnan within him." Is xiii 5 Matt x 28 ni^ C^at'^i 198 years, still God W.1S their God, as will bo found n S us iifwhrre God spoke to Moses out of the burning bush. Luke xvi 19 to thp VnH Z^u ffixxiv'^ae^ri'ctf '-^t:!' ""'A' ''' 55-''^n7her''s?ir.?:ame'a°iiS^ liUKe xxiv, rfb, jy. Acts vii. 59, read the context Dr Hpinan.u.i *v,„t u- ° nent should illustrate his signification of dSrwh.ch'is Sate f tot imcoTroT ousness with the following passages, 1 Cor. ii, 10, 11. John xii, 24 2 (or iv 16 n. 1 to 9 inclusive, 2 Cor. xii. 1 to 4 inclusive, Phil, i, 21 to 25 inclusive 2 Tim' |y' ?8 l5 'ST7' ?:\ ^'' 2^' ^"' 22. 23, James ii, 26, Peter iK, 14 'l Peter 111, 18. 19, 20. Jude 14, Rev. v., 9. 10. 11. Rev. vii. 9 to 17, Rev! xiv, 13. This closed the discussion. During the latter two evenin<rs es^ciallv thp Dr. was repeatedly and .htnusiastially applauded by the greater par^of th^ au dience, who seemed unable to restrain their satisfacticn at llTll , m ,1 rnd ofm Plate exposure with which he met the plausible sophistries of his adversary Votes of th.anks to the speakers uiul Chairman were moved bv meml.prq of PRESENTATION. Company. On his arrival. Jere^^r flLho^ P ^"*"'' "^'^ ^""^-«« Mr. Earle w.« appointed SecZ' ^To ^^1 '''Z' '" *^« *'^- oalled upon, presented to Dr WasLilon T" 7^ ""* ^''^ ' ''•^- ^^-« wal^ing-cane. as a «nto of t Jdtraard aTotZ; tStr f ''''' for h.m by the people of the village. I„ his sueech Dr R . ^'S^*''"^ '''' generous spirit of self-sacrifice which h^ T ' ^^°«h»°» referred to the .ng in lea4 his ho Jlfp^t toln'^l^rttis'V'^ ^^^^ '' ''' --" thatitwouldbeproductiveoflastin^ Jh 1 discussion, and trusted -de a suitable and feelin;^ ; .^n^s^^^^^^^^^^^^^ T'^"'^'*^- ""'■ ""^^^^^^ man and Rev. C. Cookman W M M" f T ^''' '^'^^ ^^ *^« ^^air- N. „, . Presented to ^ ASHINGTON, M.D at the Close of the debate ou the Jmmortality of the Soul. July 11,1874.