7 IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I ■ 50 '"^" m 2.0 1.25 i 1.4 1.8 1.6 Photographic Sciences Corporation 1 ^ // ^/ 4is . »' o i\ <^ 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716)872-4503 ^ '# >> ^' CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques ■HRl'»,-4.«*JeW«c ■liim— III! Ml Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques ^ The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, arp checked below. L'Institut a microfilm6 le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-§tre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une linage reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la m6thode normale de filmage sont indiqu6s ci-'^essous. D Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur m Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur □ Covers damaged/ Couverture endon □ Cov Cou ^ mmag^e Covers restored and/or laminated/ verture restaur^e et/ou pellicul6e Cover title missing/ v Le titre de couverture manque □ Coloured maps/ Cartes g§ographiques en couleur □ Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) □ Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur n n Pages damaged/ Pages endommag6es Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurees et/ou pellicul^es pTyl Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ y\\ Pages d6color6es, tachet6es ou piqu^es Pages detached/ Pages d^tach^es Showthrough/ Transparence Quality of print varies/ Quality in^gale de I'impression D Bound with other material/ Reli^ avec d'autres documents D Includes supplementary material/ Comprend du mat6riel supplementaire D D Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La reliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion le long de la marge int6rieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajout^es lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont pas 6t6 film^es. D D Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, etc., ont 6t6 film6es S nouveau de fapon d obtenir la meilleure image possible. D Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl6mentaires; This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est film6 au taux de r6duction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 10X 14X 18X 22X 26X SOX K i7y 16X 20X 24X^ 28X 32X tails du odifier une mage srrata to pelure, >n d n 32X The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: Library of Congress Photoduplication Service The images appearing here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in keeping with the filming contract specifications. Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed beginning with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impression. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol --^> (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol y (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: 1 2 3 L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grdce d la gAn^rositA de: Library of Congress Photoduplication Service Les images suivantes ont 6X6 reproduites avec le plus grand soin, compte tenL da la condition et de la nettet6 de l'exemplaire film6, et en conformity avec las conditions du contrat de filmage. Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en papier est imprim6e sont film6s en commen^ant par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires originaux sont filmds en commenpant par la premiere page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par la dernidre page qui comporte une telle empreinte. Un des symboles suivants apparaTtra sur la dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbole — ► signifie "A SUIVRE ", le symbols V signifie "FIN". Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre film6s d des taux de reduction diff^rents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre reproduit en un seul clich6, il est film6 d partir de Tangle supirieur gauche, de gauche d droite, et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'Images n^cessaire. Les diagrammes suivants lilustrent la mdthode. 1 2 3 4 5 6 ,,^;g^sg^aaiSi^ flai ie aw 1 aM!Ntt^.^ ^ i i ^ Ms ^ s-i^Bi^:- -vt^'sjf r ■'^ NEW VIEWS OP THE ORIGIN OF THE TRIBES AND NATIONS •* AMERICA. By BENJAMIN SMITH BARTON, M. D. i< COSRISPONDKNT-MBUBER OF TBB SOCIBTT Ot TBG ANT ((VARIIB or SCOTLAND; MKMBKR Of THB AMERICAN reiLOSOPHICAL •ociett; rELLuw or the ambkican acabem? or ARTS AND SCIENCES nr RnsrnN ; CORKESFONOlNa MEMBER ut THE MAtSACHDSBTTS HIS- TORICAL tOCIETT, AHD PROFESSOR OP MATERIA MEDICAj NATURAL HIITORT AND BOTANY, IN TBB VNIFERSirr Of PENNSrLFANIA. PKILADELPHIA: PRINTED, FOR THE AUTHOR, BY JOHN BIOREN. r~ ?T £ ■*■ X,*!^ . '•-^ Wfl^ m The Second Edition, correSied and greatly enlarged,-^ COPT - RIGHT Jecured. ,,_.,ji . '• ^ ^' t ¥ T O THOMAS JEFFERSON, L. L. D, VICE-PRESIDENT ^* • F T H 1 UNITED-STATES OF AMERICA,- . PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE j .# AND PRESIDENT OF THE MIERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY. SIR, IF the following pages were more perfeft, and of courfe more worthy of your notice, I {hould have taken additional pleafure in infcribing them to you. Even, however, in their prefent imper- fe6t ftate, I flatter myfelfthat you will receive them as a teftimony of my high fenfe of your ta- lents and virtues, andhof your eminent fcrvices to your country. The only dedications I ever wrote were to two pcrfons whom I greatly cftcemcd and •^1^ ' 1^ [ IV ] lovdr: the lad to a common friend*, whoCe vir- tues and fcicnce endeared him to his country, and whofe reraov?.! frnm among us, we fliall long have occafion to depiore. Thele pages are, with peculiar j5ropriety, in- fcribed to you. I know not that any perfon has paid fo much attention to the fubjeft which they involve : I know no one who places an higher value upon the queftion which I have ventured to difcufs. Although, in the progrefs of my inqui- ry, I have differed from you, in one or two cflen- tial points, I cannot fuppofe that on that account the inveftigation of the queftion will be the kTs "agreeable to you. I am confident, from my per- fonal acquaintance with you, tliat you are anxious for the difcuvrry of nuth, a\i\.\ indent to embrace it, in whatever form it may prefent itfelf. It is the jewel which all good and wife men are inpur- fuit of. It is the puri^iiii'i /aliens of fcience. I regret, with you, Sir, the evanifhmcnt of fo many of the tribes and nations of America. I regret, with you, the want of a zeal among our countrymen for collefting materials concerning the hifiory of thefe people. I regret the want of the neccffary endeavours to introduce among thofe of then, who have efcp.p.'d the ravages of time, [inftead oi'the vices and the mifcries of half-civi- * David Ritienhoufe. '*./'*«n' % *% "^U- % %.. • I E V ] lizcd nations] the true principles of focial order j the arts which conduce to the dignity and the happinefs of mankind, and a rational and lading fyftem of nK)rals and religion. Let it not be faid, that they are incapable of improvement. Such an aftcrtion can only fuit thofe fpeculative philo- fophers who retire to their clofcts inveloped in a thick atmofphere of prejudices, which the ftrongf ft lights of truth cannot pervade. Natu- ral Hiftory, which opens the door to fo much pre- cious knowledge concerning mankind, teaches us, that the phyfical differences between nations are but inconfidpruble, and hiftory informs us, that civilization has been conftantly preceded by bar- barity and rudenefs. It teaches us, a mortifying truth, that nations may relapfe into rudenefs a- gain ; all their proud monuments crumbled into duft, and themfclves, now favages, fubjedts of contemplation among civilized nations and philo- fophers. In the immenfe fcheme of nature, which the feeble mind of man cannot fully comprehend, it may be our lot to fall into rudenefs once more. There are good reafons for conjeduring, that the anceftors of many of the favage tribes of America are the defcendants of nations who had attained to a much higher degree of polifli than themfclves. My inquiries, at leaft, feem to render it certain, that the Americans are not, as fome writers have fuppoled, fpecifically different from the Perfians, and other improved nations of Afia. The infe- ■nu if >•. [ VI ] '. rence from tliis tlifcovery is interefting and im- * portant. \Vc learn thac the Americans arc fufccp- * tiblc of improvement. If civilization be a blefTing; if man by relin- * qui/hing the condition of the favageor barbarian, aflTumcs a more independent ftation in the range of human affairs ; if in proportion to his advance- .! ment to improvement (I fpcak not of a vicious refinement), he is even fitting himfelf for the en- joyment of higher comforts, of unmcafured hap- pinefs elfevvhcre -, it is furely worthy the attention of the good and wife to endeavour to extend the \ empire of civility and knowledge among the nu- merous nations who are fcattered over the coun- tries of America. Individuals have often laboured in this bufinefs ; but it fecms to be of fufficicnt importance to engage the attention of whole na- tions } and it is peculiarly worthy of the notice of the United-States, who have exhibited the auguft fpeftacle of a people relinquifhing their depend- ance, and moving with an unparalleled rapidity to the attainment of knowledge, and of arts. I know not. Sir, whether ever the government of our country will think the civilization of the Indians a matter of as much importance as I do : but I muft confefs, that I derive a portion of my happinefs from fuppofing that they will. Should I be difappointed, I fliall have no occafion to look -'/f/ S:lJtI^>J ir^I~ ^--^- ' -Saust"i:UiiT;ji^^ *». •> n of the as I do : ►n of my Should n to look I : IS * (. I ( PREFACE. A > I ,LL the Indian, Arctic, and European '.vords which are compared, or othcrwiil- mcntiomd^in my vocabularies, &c. are printed in two diilVrcnr. kinds of letter, viz. the Italic and t\\6 Roman. The former, which are much the moll numerous, arc taken from printed books, or have been com- municated to me by my friends, in different parts of North-America. I have, in every inftancc, except with regard to the accentuation, printed thefe words as I found them. I have frequently omitted the accents, becaufc the fame author fometimes accents his words in two or more dif- ferent ways, and becaufc the accents are entirely omitted by the authors of fome of the moll ex- tenfive of the American vocabularies. This is particularly the cafe in Mr. David Zeifberger's EJay of a Delaware- Indian mdEnpt/b Spelling- Book*. All the words printed in the Roman letter were colleaed by myfelf : the greater part of them as they were pronounced by Indians themfclves ; the remainder as they were pronounced by Indian ui- terpreters, traders, or gentlemen who have been * Printed at Philadelphia, in 1776. «. : I ( ix ) among the Indians. As the words thus collc(fled now conftitutc a confidcrable part of the whole mafs which I offer to the public, it is ncceflary that I fhould inform my readers what fyftcm I have followed in the pronunciation. The A has always the open found, as in the words farher, rather, and many others. The A A is to be found- ed long. The E is always founded as E in head, bed, &c. or like A in table, and Ay, in fay. The foft found which is often given to this letter I have reprefented by the double Ee, as in tree, bee, &c. The G is founded hard, as in God, go, &c* The J is founded as in juft, and many others j or like G in giant; The 1 has the fcveral founds of this letter *. The Oo, which {o frequently occurs in the Indian words, has a loilg found, as in the wcrd ooze. It appears to be nearly equiva- lent to the U of the Latins. The U always founds like U in us, or in the vulgar word, fufs. My mode of pronunciation will, I belicVe, L«^bvi- ous in all other inftances. But I cannot conclude this fubjeft without obferving that the frequent complaint, that the Englifh language is not ade- quate to the communicating of the founds of In* dian words, is a complaint which originates in prejudice, or in a very partial attention to the fubjeft. In this opinion I am not alone. I do not mean to aflcrt, that all the founds of Indian wofds can be fully and completely reprefented bv * It cftea found* like I, in the word in. ■I-' '^li m I mil [■il.l-iri '■ 3:, >r' i\ J, I # ( X ) the Englifti letters. Difficulties fomctimcs occur. But they occur in the writing of Indian words ia any other language. All the words (with the exception of a very few wlitre the authorities are given) printed in italics under the head of Lenni-Lcnnape, or Dclawarcs, arc taken from Zcilberger's Efay, already men- tioned, or where communicated to me by my in- duftrious and amiable friend Mr. John Hcckcwel- der (of Bethlehem), to whom this work is under many obligations. Both this gentleman and Mr. Zeifberger have adopted the German fpelling. In thefe words, the " A founds like aw in law; C before e and i like ts, before a and o like k, and before « like oo in the word room; E like ay in fay; G like the Englifh g in gay; I like eej J, in the beginning and middle of a word, like the En- > glidi i in in; U like oo, or ou in you; Y like ee; ' Z \\}!St ts; ch nearly like gh, cfpecially in the Scotch Dialeft; au like ow; uy like ooy; ai like oy; ay like oy; ei like i, and eu nearly like i*." A few of the Chippewa, and all the Munfi, words (in italics) were communicated to me by Mr. Heckewclder. The greater part of the Chippe- wa words are taken from Carver and from Long, who both adopt the Englifh fpelling. All the Mahicon words (in italics) are on the authority of • Ztifljtrjer. *- Wi 0^ % ». ♦ » P titfmmm n 'fmmmm0 a m ncs occur. n words ia a very few d in italics Delawarcs, eadjr mcn- by my in- Eicckcwel- rk is under in and Mr. pclling. In in law; G^ ike ki and L, like ay in e ee i J, in ce the En- Y like ee; ally in the 3oy; ai like ly like i*." unfi, words me by Mr. le Chippe- from Long, ;. All the authority of ( si ) Mr. Jonathan Edwards f, and Mr. Heckewelder. A few of the Shawnee words were communicated to me by Mr. Heckewelder, and by Mr. Chriftopher Greenup, lately a member of Congrefs j the great- er part of them, however, by General Gibion (of Fort-Pitt), who is well acquainted with the dialed of this tribe. The words in the lansuase of the Miamis, I mean thofe in italics, are taken from two pretty extenfive manufcript vocabularies, the firft by the late Mr. Samuel Colefworthy (of Bof- ton), a young gentleman by whofe premature death fociety has been deprived of a member, whofe exertions feemed to promifc much. Ic is evident that Mr. Colefworthy adopted the Engiilh fpclling. The ftcond of thefe vocabularies ap- pears to have been made with llbour and care by Colonel Mentges, who follows the German fpcll- ing. The few words in the di-.lcds of the Kik- k .poos and Piankafhaws were communicated to me by Mr. George Turner. In the KikJ^apoo ' words, the A is to be founded broad j and in the Piankalhaw words, the A and the I arc both pro- nounced as in French. AH the Natick words were carefully extraifled from Mr. John Elliot's tranflation of the Old and New Tcftament into t Obfervations on the Language of the Muhkekaneew Indi-, ^n$, &c, New-Haven: 1788. ( xii ) the language of thefe Indians*. There can be very little doubt that Mr. Elliot wrote thefe words as an Englilhman, The Narraganfct words, with the exception of a very few which arc printed in ro- man letter?, are taken from Roger Williams's Key. Williams, I believe, was an Englifhman. The words in the language of the Indians of Pe- nobfcot and St. John's, are taken from a M. S. vocabulary by the Reverend Mr. Little. For this vocabulary I am indebted to the friendfhip of the very rcfpedlablc Judge Sullivan of Bofton. The greater number of the Algonkin words are taken from Lahontan, who was a Frenchman : a few from Kalm t» who received thofe in his work from a Frenchman. Thofe in the language of the Acadians (perhaps the Indians now called . Mickmacks) are taken from the Novus Orbis of De Laet. I fuppofe that this writer extrafted them from fome French traveller, perhaps from •♦ Efcarbot. To De Laet, whofe work is indeed l^yery valuable one, I am alfo indebted for all *« ♦ * * Of this laborious work there have been two editions. I believe tliat \vhich I poffefs is the fecond. The title page of the Old- Teftrment is wanting: but it appears from the title page of the New Teftamcnt that it was printed at Cambridge (England ?), in 1680. f Travels into North-America, &c. vol. iii. p. 204. Eng- U(h tranflation. London: 1771. '^ A.' xin ) be very rords as with the d in ro- illiams's, ifhman. ' of Pc- aM. S. ;. For iendfhip ' Bofton. jrds are hrnan : a his work ;uage of w called Ori>is of fxtraftcd aps from s ,indec4 d for all the words in the languages of the Sankikani, and HocheJygenfcs. He mentions the latter on the authority of Quarterius, who was a Frenchman. The few woid^ in the language of the " Mon- tagnars de Canada," and thofe in the language of the " Canadians," are taken from Champiain's Voyages *. They were not, however, coiledled by Champlain, but by two French Jefuits, R. P. Mafle and R. P. Brcboeuf. f _^ All the words in the languages of the Pampti- ' coughs and Woccons are taken from Lawfon, who was, I believe, an En^iman : certainly a native of Britain. Mod of the Seneca words, in italics, were communica^d to me by my friend Major Adam Hoops. The Mohawk words-, in the fame let- ter, are principally taken from a work the joint labour of three Englifh mifllonarics among the Mohawk- Indians f; or were communicated to me by Mr. Jafpar ParriOi, of Canandaqua, in the I 3tate of New-York. The Onondago words arc i/ editions. I itle page of tn the title Cambridge 204. Eng- "'- P 4' • Lea Voyages de la Novelle France Occidentale, difte Canada, faits par le Sr de Champlain Xainftongeois, Capitaine, &. A Paris : i6j2. ^to. :•}«#■. t The Order for Morning and Evening Prayer, &c. &c. Collefted and tranflated into the MohaN\ k language under the direftion of the late Rev. Mr. William Andrews, the late Rev\ Mr. Henry Barclay, and the Rev. Mr. John Ogiivie. PnlftvH (we are not informed where) in the year 1769. 8,0. * I;-- ! ( XIV ) principally taken from a very ample M. S. voca- bulary, by Mr. David Zeifbergcr already men- tioned. A copy of this vocabulary was kindly communicated to me by Mr. Heckeweldcr. Mr. Zcilberger's mode of pronunciation has been mentionctl. All the Cayuga and Oneida words, in italics, were communicated to me by Judge Dean, of Weftmoreland, in the ftate of New- York. To this gentleman, who adopts the Englifh fpclling, I am likewife indebted for fomc of the Tufcarora words. The remainder of the words in this language are taken from the accu- rate Lawfon. All the Naudoweflie words, except a very few which I give on the authority of Father Hennepin*, arc taken from Cafver's work. Mod of the Chcerake t> and all the Chikkafah • New Difcovery, &c. London : 1698. ' -t" After the greater part of this work was pri.nted off, I re- ceived a fmall colledlion of Cheerake words, from Mr. Palifot De Beauvois, an intelligent French botanift, who has lately vifited the fouthcrn parts of our States.' 1 have not had an opportaniiy of making that ufe of thefe words which I could wi(h to have done. A few of them, however, will be found, in their proper places, in the laft pages of the Additions to the Vocabularies. Thefe words are written after the French manner, and are diftinguifhed by the letter b. Mr. Beauvois's catalogue conitrms me in the opinion which I have already advanced (5« Preliminary Difcourfe, pages Ixvii, kviii. and Appendix, p. xxi. ), that the langj||jgc "■s> ( XV ) -■:'# and Choktah, words in italics, are taken from Adair's Hiftory. Adair was a native of Ireland. Some of the Mufkohge words are taken from the fame author : others from a manufcript (by an American officer) in the office of the Secretary of war. The few words in the language of the Natchez (the word Ooka, which fignifics water, excepted) are given on the authority of Du Pratz and Boflu, who were both Frenchmen. The greater part of the Mexican words are taken from Dc Lact's Hovus Orbis ; a very few are taken from Gage, and from Clavigero j and one or two from Forfter. De Laet informs us, that he took the Mexican words from a voca'bulary printed in the city of Mexico *. I am indebted to Gage, who was an Englifhman, for all the • Novns Orbis, p, 240. . ' of the Cheerake is radically the fame as that of the Six- Nations, and their immediate brethren. According to Mr. Beauvois,the Cheerake call a houfe, Kaljotin: the Cochnev^a- goes call the fame, ^anunchfoteeh. The Cheerake call the head, ^coala ; the Wyandots, Skotau. The Cheerake call fire, Tcila: the Six^ations, Ogilla ; iit. &c. The Cheerrke call milk, Ounente: the Oneidas, Onoontauh: the Ononda»os, Onuiigiva. The Ciieerake call night, Tjimoe : the Tufcaro^as, Aucht-tseeneeah. Other inftances might be mentioned. Thus, every acccffion to the mafs of our American vocabularies in- creafts our pij^ofs, that the languages of America are not fo ^iilrent from each other as has been aflertej. :l^' *. i4' -#'- 1 ( xvi ) Poconchi words. The words in the llnguage of the Daricn-Indians are taken from Lionel Wa- fer's account of the Ifthmus of Daricn *. Wafer . was a Scotchman ? All the words in the languages V of the Jaioi, Arwaccrc, and Shebaioi, are taken from De Lacr. I do not learn from what work, or from whom, he took them f. The words in the I language of the CaraVbes arc all taki-n from Rochefort, who was a Dutchman. The Brafilian words are taken from John Lcry, who was a Frenchman %, from Marcgrave §, and from De Lact. All the Peruvian words arc taken from Gar- c^iaffo De La Vega's Royal Commentaries \ ; from . De L^et, or from Forfter. The Chilefe words * A New Voyage and Defcription of the Ifthmus of America. London : 1704. 8vo. t Moft probably, fromfome Dutch or Flemifh writer or na- vigator ; he at leaft tell j us that feme of the words in the lan- guage of the Jaioi were noted by his countrymen, " a nof- tratibus." p. 643. I See his HiftoriaNavigationis in Bra^iam, quae et America dicitur, printed in 15 S6. 8vo. § Marcgrave informs us that he received the Brafilian word* from Emanuel de Moracs/" lingur; illius peritiflimo." Trac- tatns Topographicus & Meteorologicus Brafilia: &c. p. 21. Moraes was a Portuguefe Jew. II Englifti tranflation. By Sir Paul Rycaut. London; 1688. folio. *• 4 ** I *uage of cl Wa- '. Wafer nguagcs e taken It work, Js in the v.n from Brafilian > was a from De om Gar- II ; from e words }f America. riter or na- in the Ian- n, " a nof- et America 'ilian word* 0." Trac- &c. p. 21. kdon; i68S< Nve^ ( "vii ) are taken from Margrave, and from the Abbe Molina's valuable Hiftory of Chili *. The few words in the language of the people of Green- and are taken from Crantz's intercfting Hiftory of this country f. The Efquimaux words arc taken from Kalm |, who received them from the Jefuit Saint Pie §. In the courfe of the • Spanifc tranflation. t The Hiftory of Greenland : containing a defcription of the country, and its inhabitants, &c. vol. I. Englifh tranfla- tion. London: 1767. X Vol. 3. p. 239, 440. § I am at a lofs to determine, where, in an arrangf nent of the American languages according to their affinities, I ought to place the dialefts of the Greenlanders and Efquimaux. Thefe dialeds, however, appear to have fome relation to the languages of the Poconchi, the Galibis, and the Caraibes. Thus the Poconchi call father Tat : the Greenlanders, J/taf. The Poconchi call heaven 7axaA: the Efquimaux, Taitud. The Greenlanders call land, Nuna : the Galibis, Neuo : and the Caraibes, Nemim. I fhall now endeavour to point out a few refemblances be- tween the languages of the Greenlanders and Efquimaux and certain languages of the Old- World. This, indeed, ought to Jiave been done in another place. The Efquimaux call the Hyt.Killik, or Shik: the Kouriltzi, 1^2. Sehesk, znd Seek. The Efquimaux call the car, Tchiu : the Ofetti, 79, Cie^j, The Efquimaux call the foot, Jtiiat : the Koriaki, 15;,' Katchad. The Efquimaux call an egg, Manntguk : the Tchio- ehonflci, 54, Mowa: the Eftlandians, 5;, Moontta : the Vo I ,'l!lf 1 :#" t! h t| . I! ( xviii ) Preliminary Difcourfe and Comparative Vora- bularics, I have mentioned the authors from whom the other American words are borrow- *^ am forry that it has not always been in my power to fpccify, with more certainty than I have done, the particular tribes of Indians that fpokc the languages which I have received into n y lifts. This, however, is a fault that muft be laul to the charge of others, and not to myfclf. 1 hus, under the head of Indians of Virguua, I have mentioned feveral words on the authority of the celebrated Captain John Smith. But noth.ng that this author tells us can enable me to decide, what particular tribe fpoke the language m quel tion. I fuppofe it, however, to have been the language of the nation under the dominion of the powerful and infolent Powhatan. In hke man- ner, I have made ufe of a pretty copious voca- bulary publiflicd by Mr. William Wood, as early as the year 1639*. Wood mentions dif- goulitchi, 69. Moongee: the Semoyads, 123, Ma,na: 124. Monna :\2'i, Monoo: the Kamaftfhini, 132. MoonM. The Efquimaux call the numeral two. Tigal : the Coreans (who inhabit the Corea) Tocg». The Efquimaux call the numeral three Ki: the Inguftevtzi, Ko» ; and the Toofchetti, Ko. ' •New-EnglandsProfpea, London: 1639. 4^- ( 5'i't ) /c Vora- lors from borrow- iccn in my lan I have ;hat f^joke 1 into my ,uft be laid elf. Thus, lia, I have ,rity of the ut nothing to decide, ge in qucf c been the nion of the like man- )ious voca- Wood, as cntions dif- , Maina : 1 24* MoouM. The • Coreans (who call the numeral ifchetti, Ko. . 4to, fcrcnt Indian nations inhabiting New-England, fuch as the Conneftacuts, Mowhacks, or Mow- hackes, Churchers, Tarrcntccnes, Pequants, Nar- raganfets, and Aberginians. The Conncftacuts and Mohackcs inhabited to the wcftward -, the Churchers and Tarrcntccnes to the eaft and north- eafti the Pequants and Narraganfets in the fouthern parts j and the Aberginians to the north- ward. There can be little doubt, that the words in Wood's vocabulary belonged to one or more of thefe nations. I am ftill more forry, that it has not been in my power to arrang« the various American languages and dialcfts according to their affinities, or ana- logies, to each other. This, it is obvious, (hould have been the arrangement. But it is an arrange- ment for which we are not yet prepared, bccaufc we are not yet in poflcflTion of ample vocabu- laries of the American languages. Time will enable us to make a much more complete analo- gical arrangement of thefe languages. Mean- while, I have done fomething towards fo defir^bl* an end, particularly in fome of the larger lifts. All the Afiatic and European words to which numbers are annexed arc taken from the Foca- bularia C >mparativa of Profeffor Pallas *. With i •^HBIWBIPfWIpiifW")') • W- '■ IIUPI ! i ' \ ( 3CX ) rcfpca to thcfe words, it is neccffary to oblcrvc, that the A is always to be pronounced broad, as with the Germans, and moft other nations. It has the broad found of A in certain Englifh words, fuch as all, fait &c. The W is to be pronounced as the V of the Latins, or the W of the Germans. The Z like the Zita of the Greeks, and the Z of the French. I am rather fearful that I have not been exaft as to the I common of the Latins and Germans, which I have rcprc- fcnted thus, Ee, or ee. It is neccffary, therefore, to obfervc, that the found of this is like I in hiU, bill, filh, and many others. The I long of the Latins and Germans is to be pronounced as in Latin and German, and not like the I of the Eng- lilh. This found is accurately reprefented in Englifh by the double vowels ee, as in tree. The E is founded broad as in the German ; like ay, in fay. The double vowels Oo (as in the words Pa/Off, Tockkooy which fignify hair) are to be founded like the Ou of the French and the 8 of the Greeks. Wherever in writing thcfc words from Pallas, 1 have placed the Ch (provided an S does not pre- cede the C), as in the word CbakeCy one of the Pcrfian words for earth or land, the Ch is to be pronounced like the Ch of the Germans, or the .X of the Greeks. li> all the words, the Sch is ( 3txi ) oblVrvc, broad, as tions. It I Englifh ts to be the W of c Greeks, it fearful common irc rcprc- thereforc, I in hiU, vg of the ced as in the Eng- fented in } in tree, nan ; like rds Paf09t tinded like e Greeks. Pallas, I s not pre- ne of the 1 is to be ns, or the the Sch is to be pronounced like the Ch of the French, the Sc of the Italians, and the Sch of the Germans. The harfh St/cb is the German loiind. The O* ii analogous to the Oe of the Germans and La- tins. The Th is familiar to the Fiiglilh. In a few inftances, I have found it difTcilt to convey by Englifli letters the precifc found. In thefe calea (fee the articles Mountain, I, 6cc. in the Vocabu- laries), 1 have printe i the word fiom Pallas in Roman letters, where each letter is to be found- ed agreeably to the rules which I have mentioned in fpeaking of the American words written by myfclf. I have fcldom paid any attention to the accents in the words written by Dr. Pallas. The greater part of the Afiatic and European words are taken from Pallas, and to thefe (as I have juft. faid) numbers are annexed. Some of the Afiatic words are derived from other fources, but the pronunciation of thefe will not be doubt- ful, as I have in every inilance mentioned the authority for fuch words. Thus fome of the Japanefe words are taken from a copious " Vo- cabulary of the Japanefe language" by my learn- ed friend Profcflbr Thunberg*, who being a na- tive of Sweden, doubclcfs adopts a pronunciation. • See hi« Travels in Europe, Africa, and Afia. rerformed between the yeurs 1770 and 1 77y. En2li(h traiiflatiua. Loa- lien. ( xxii ) ^tvhich in moft cafes is nearly fimilar to that of the Germans. Oclicr words in this language and in the language, of the Siamcfe, are taken from Kacmpfcr. In a work of this nacure, more than in moft others, it was necclTary to give the authoritits for my fyfte-m. This, I hope, I have now done to the fatisfaaion of my reader. If in purfuing me (and I with him to purfuc me with the cagle-cye of fcience), he often difcovcrs very ftriking af- finities between the American words which I have coUefted and the words of Afiatic and European nations, I may confidently fay, that he will dif- covcr ftill greater, and more numerous, affinities between thefe Afiatic and European languages and the American languages coUcdtcd by authors ofalmoft all the nations of Europe. But I fhall not take any pains to convince the learned, that I have uniformly laboured to be accurate j and that I have never fuffercd my attachment to fyf- tern to miQead mc from the virtuous path of truth. I have not only anxioufly fought the truth, but I fhall feel grateful to thofc who will point out the real errors of this work. « J'aime autant «« unc perfonne qui me relcve d' une crreur, «* qu'une autre qui m' apprend une verite, parce «« qu* en elFct une crreur corrigeccft unc vcnte," BUFFON. ^m. \ hat of the nd in the Cacmpfcr. in moft Dritits for done to rfuing me eagle-eye riking af- ich I have European will dif- , affinities languages t>y authors uc I fhall irned, that jrate; and ent to fyf- IS path of ; the truth, 1 point out ime autant me crreur, rite, parcc inc vcrite," ( xxiii ) In this new edition, tliprc arc many important addit'o.is to the vocabularies * Thelc will fcrve to (how, more excenfivcly, the affinities of the American hnguagcs to each other, and the affi- nities of thcfe languages to thofc of Afia and F.urope. Though the work is ftill very impcr- fccty and mud 1on<5 continue fo, unlcfs many la- bourers fhould enter the intcrcrting Hirld, or un- til fomc one labourer in this field (liall have more Icifure to devote his attention to the fubjcft, — I am pcrfuadcd, that it is much more pcrfcdk than we had any rcafoii to expert, from our want of materials, a few years ago. Let the reader, who fellows me in this inquiry, recollcdl: that the path which I tread is almoft entirely new. I may, without vanity, compare myfelf to the new fettler in the wildcrncfs of our country. I found no cultivated fpot. In the vaft foreft, my eafieft taflc was the removal of brambles and thorns. Un- equal to the opening of an extenfivc road, I have, at leaft, fucceeded in opening a path, which will ferve to direft the traveller in his pilgrimage of fcience. Unequal to the building of a (lately * Befides the additions to mod of the articles in the firll edition, the following articles appear for the firft time in this, viz. Leaf, Mountain, Hill, River, Bird, Fi(h, Bread, Bone, Horn, Houfe, Air, Light, White, Blaik, Thou, No. ( xxiv ) edifice, I have erefted an humble habitation, in which philofophers, who have laboured in re- fcarches of this kind, may rt-pofe from a portion of their toil. More ought not to be cxpeftcd of one pcrfon, who, in the prai^iice of a profefilon a« anxious as it is important, has known neither the felicities of kifure nor of wealth. But as " no book, to ufc the language of Johnfon, was ever fpared out oftcndcrnefs to the author, and" as «• the world is little folicitous to know whence proceeded the faults of that which it condemns," 1 ftiall neither complain of the difficulties which, in the condufl of this work, I have had to encoun^ icr, nor (hall 1 take up any of the reader's time in apologizing for the impcrfeftions of the work. If I were to apologize, it would be to little au- thors, who can know nothing of the labour which has been employed in this inquiry. To fuch men as the veteran Bryant, Marfden, Pallas, and other writers, I need offer no apology. They will view my labours with tcndernefs and candour, It will afford me real pleafure to find this fub- jc6t foliciting the attention of many other inqui- rers. Though I may feel the innocent pride of one who fuppofes he has made a difcovery, I (hall not be mortified to live to fee my labours, in a great meafure, forgotten in the happier la- bours of feme future invefiigator. Should I re- n^lL Mtation, in red in re- a a portion xpeftcd of rofefilon a« neither the It as " no , was ever •, and" as >w whence ondemns," ;ies which, to encoun-r adcr's time * the work. ) little au- bour which To fuch Pallas, and gy. They id candour, d this fub- >ther inqui- it pride of ifcovery, I ny labours, lappicr la- Ihould I re- f ( XXV ) linquifh this hardly half-cultivated field, it will be, like the new fettle r, to take: poflciTion of ano- ther, and perhaps a richer, foil. In an immcnfc country fuch as this whicli v/e inhabit, a country unexplored by fcience, the eye need not be dimn- ed in merely looking after objedts upon which to dwell. The fcene is various and new. The phy- fical and moral hiftory of v/hole nations are to be explored. The animal and the vegetable pro- duftions of America have never yet been ex- amined with labour or attention. In fhort, the naturalift beholds a country which, with rcfpcft to the progrefs we have liitherto made in ex- amining its riches, may with flrict propriety be called NEW-. It is not likely, that I fliall for fome time to come, trouble the public with any thing farther on the I'uhjcft of this work. I do not mean, however, to relinquifh the inquiry. It will long be to me an inquiry interefting, and even a fource of happinefs. While, therefore, I fhall not be wanting in my endeavours to increafe the mafs of our information, I fliall think myfelf favoured by the communications of fuch gentlemen as may have opportunities of coUefting vocabularies of our Indians. Whatever relates to the phyfical or moral hiftory of the Americans; whatever may tend to refleft light upon the pad or prcfent # t ( xxvi ) condition of thcfc mouldering families of mankind; whatever may tend to increafe our acquaintance with the produftions of this extenfivc country, will be gratefully received, and acknowledged. In the fervid feafon of youth, I may, perhaps, cal- culate upon labours, upon fucceflcs and exertions, to which I am unequal. This is a failing to which men much older than myfclf are liable. I have, however, the fatisfaftion of knowing, that my coUcftion of original papers refpcfting this country is already very confiderable ; and that I have adtually made much progrefs in an extenfivc work, which, even in its prefent unfinilhcd ftate, may be of effcntial fervice to the future hiftorian of America. BENJAMIN SMITH BARTON. Philadelphia, July 13th, 1793. I ( xxvii. ) lanklndi laincance ntry, will red. In ips, cal- xcrtions. Failing to re liable, /ing, that fting this md that I extcnfive hcd ftate, hiftorian RTON. N. B. The Aftcricks, which {o frequently occur in the Vocabularies, are intended to Ihow where the Indian words are wanted. A note of interrogation is annexed to many of the Ameri- can words, when I have been in doubt about the complete accuracy of the fpelling. j m > -. )-';!»' '-;* ;*- ji- 1;^- ERRATA. IN the PREFACE, page xii. (firft note) for Old Teftrment, read Old Teftament. — In the Pre- liminary Discourse, page 15, line 4, for fancy, read vanity : page 24, line 3, for Stra- lenberg, read Strahlenberg : page 40, line 5, for tribes, read tribe. In the Comparative Vocabularies, page 9, line 10, read ^ijfalt his fon : page 32, line 7, for Madoon, read Madoon: page 20, for Eetjen- Camegauteel? read Loonkquec : page 42, line 5, for Snufagh, read Ofnoongce : page 46, line 3 from the bottom, for JVauahloo, read Owauh : page 53, line 6, for EJcaltey^ read Wcighncctah, Wighneetau: page 66, line 13, for Yoeenjagh^ ( xxviii. ) read Yoo-un-jah ; line 17, for Jhungaf read Ohunjea, youghwhenjauda : page 67, line 10, for Efkimaux, read Grcenlandcrs : page 72, line 8, for Toene, read Time: line 11, for Tiiriy rtid Tiin? T'cun. V *««>^i^!-»*T»f«»*|^it^tf^*--W »^ PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. " THE Tranfmigration of Nations is, indeed, a nice and ticklifh Point to touch upon ; But certain it is, that many difficul- ties would be removed, were the Advice of Leibnitz followed, and a competent Knowledge obtained of the Languages of North-Afia; This great Philofopher being fully convinced, that by the Help of thefe, many Things concerning the Tranfmigra- tion of Nations might be clear'd up." STRAHLENBERG. THE celebrated Athanafius Kircher has ob- ferved, that the fluftuations of the ocean itfclf are not as numerous as the opinions of men concerning the origin of its faline impreg- nation *. With as little extravagance, I may ob- krve, that the opinions of writers concerning the origin, or parental countries, of the Americans ♦ Athanasii Kircherie Soc. Jefu MundusSubterraneus, &c. Lib. iii. Can. iii. p. i6i. Amftelodami, 1665. b P * i ( ii ) arc as numerous as the tribes and nations who inhabit this vaft portion of the earth. Dropping this metaphorical language, I may fafcly aflert, that few qucflions have excited more attention than that which I have juft mentioned, and am ."bout to confider. More than three centuries have now pafled away fince the difcovery of the Ameri- can iflands by Columbus. More than two cen- turies arc completed fince extenfivc colonies of Spaniards, of Portuguefe, ofEnglifli, of French, and of other European nations, had taken pof- fcflion of fome of the faireft and mod fertile por- tions of the new-world. During thcfc long periods, the origin of the Americans has conftant- ly appeared to be a fubjedt highly worthy of in- vcftigation. Hence we find that it has artraded the attention of the writers of almoft all the nations of Europe, not to mention fome American writers, who although they enjoyed greater apportuni- tics of acquiring ufcful information on the fubjeft, have not been more fuccefsful in their inquiries. Men of the moft oppofitc talents have undertaken this invcftigation, or have hazarded, in general terms, their fentiments on the' fubjedl. The libraries of ancient and of modern times have been ranfacked by men of learning and of labour : genius and imagination have lent it their aid ; eloquence has fometimes moulded the fubjcfl into ( iii ) beauty; whilft religious prejudices, which mix themfclvcs with lb many of the adions and the thoughts of men, have only tended to obfcure the queftion, by creating proofs, and by poifoning the fources of a purer information. It is' remote from my dcfign to examine, in this memoir, the various opinions of authors concerning the origin of the Americans. It would require a large volume to exhibit even a general view of what has been written on the fubjedl. It would require much time to do juftice to the learning and ingenuity, or to cxpofe the weaknefles and conceits, of thofc who have wandered in thisinte- rcfting field of inquiry. For much information on the fubjedt, Ircfer the reader to Father Charlevoix's Preliminary Dijcourje on the Origin of the Americans*. For much ingenious extravagance, enriched, how- ever, with many ufeful fafts, I refer him to Mr. Adair's Hijiory of the American Indians -f. I fliall afterwards particularly mention the opinions of fome writers on the queftion. At prefent, I fhall content myfclf with obferving, that the • A Voyage to North-America, &c, two volumes gvo. Dublin: 1766. Engliih Tranflatioi^ f London ; 1775. 410. . jf, ■■■^"' ■t--V-«- --^L-.. ■J < flifc . M ii n > fl i »' l t il Wl li )Wn''tdfliwfciiTfrniir(,Mi*fc ( VI ) wc find the author of Le Philojopbe Douceur f, the late Mr. de Voltaire, Bernard Romans :|:, and a few others, who have, indeed, examined the f Printed at Berlin, in 1774. 1 have never feen this work. t A Concife Natural Hiftoryof Eaftand Weft-Florida, &c. New-York: 1776. iimo. This author faye he does not be- lieve that the red men of America have come " from the weft- ward out of the eaft of Afia." " I am firmly of opinion, fays he, that God created an original man and woman in this part of the globe, of different fpecies from any in theotwcr parts, and if perchance in the Ruffian dominions, there are a people of fimilar make and manners, is it not more natural to think they were colonies from the numerous nations on the continent of America, than to imagine, that from the fmall compara- tive number of thofe Ruffian fubjefts, fuch a vaft country fliould have been fo numeroufly peopled," &c. p. 38, 39. without fpecial procreation of their own kind, then I fee no neceffity, why they (hould by Gods fp> c a\ appointment, be fo carefully prcferved in Noaht Ark [as they we.e] in time of the Deluge. Wherefore, feeing it is certain, that thofe ravenous Beafts of America, are the progeny of thofe of the fame kind iaJJia, and that men, as is likely, conveyed them not [to their own prejudice] from the one Continent to the other, it carryeth a great likelyhood and appearance of truth, that if they joyn not together, yet are they neer neighbours, and but little disjoyned each from other, for even to this day, in the Ifles of Cuba, Jamaica, Hifpaniola, Burichena, and all the reft, which are fo far removed from the firm land, that thefe Beafts cannot fwim from it to them, the Spaniards record, that Boneofthefe are found." Enquiries, &c. p. 117, 118, 119, uo. ;;{:, and a lined the n this work. Florida, &c. does not be- om the wcft- >pinion, fays I in this part ;otiitr parts, are a people ural to think the continent lall eompara- vail country ). 38,39. then I fee no itment, be fo a time of the lofe ravenous he fame kind hem not [to the other, it truth, that if jhbours, and this day, in I, and all the d, that thefc J record, that 18, 119,120. ( vii ) qucftion in a very fuperficial manner •. This, with rcfpca to the enquiry, is their greatcft crime. It is remarkable, as Charlevoix obferves, that thofc who have undertaken this inveftigation " fhould have negledlcd the only Means that re- • I niall here quote what Mr. de Voltaire has faid on this fubjea. " The apron, which nature has given to the Caffrcs, and whofe flabby and lank fkin falls from their naval halfway down their thighs ; the black breafts of the Samoiedes women, the beard of the males of our continent, and the beardlefi chins of the Americans, are fuch ftriking diftinftions, that it IS fcarce poffible to imagine that they are not each of them of different races. " But now, continues our lively author, if it Ihould be alk- ed, from whence came the Americans, it Ihould beaflced from whence came the inhabitants of the Terra Auftralis j and it has been already anfwered, that the fame providence which placed men in Norway, planted fome alfo in America and under the antarftic circle, in the fame manner as it planted trees and made grafs to grow there." 2lt Phihfophy 0/ Hi/- tory. p. 8 & 9. London : ,766. In another part of the fame, very lingular and incorreft work (p. 46.) he fays, " Can it ftill be afked from whence came the men who peopled Ame- rica? The fame queftion might be a&ed with regard to the Terra Auftralis. They are much farther diftant from the port which Columbus fat out from, than the Antilles. Men and bcafts have been found in all parts of the earth that are inha- bitable } Who placed them there ? We have already anfwered he that caufcd the grafs to grow in the fields ; and it is no more furprifing to find men in America, than it is to find flies there." By the way, it may be doubted whether flics, any more than bees, are natives of America. li ( viii ) mained to come at the Truth of what they were m Search of; I mean, the comparing the Languages. Ineffcft, in the Refearch in quclhon, it appears to me. continues our fcnfiblc author, that the Knowledge of the principal Languages of Ammca. and the comparing them with thofe of our Hem.f- phere, that are looked upon as primitive might pofTibly ftt us upon fome happy Dircovcry, and that Way ofafcending to the Original of nations, v,hich is the kaft equivocal, is far from being fo difficult as might be imagined. We have had, and ftill h»ve Travellers and Mifrionar.es, who have worked on the languages that arc fpoken in all the provinces of the New-World. It would onlybeneceffaryto make a Colkft.on of their Grammars and Vocabularies, and to collate them v^tth the dead and living Languagesof the Old World that pafs for Originals. Even the different Dialeas. in Spite of the alterations they have un- dergone, ftiU retain enough of the Mother- Tongue tofurnifh confiderable Lights. .. Inftead of this Method, which has been nc- gleaed. they have made Enquiries into the Man- ners, Cuftoms, Religion, and Traditions of the Mcric.^ in order to difcover their Ongina . Notwithftanding. I am perfuaded. that this D - nuifuion is only capable of producing a falfc lit, more likely to dazzle, and to make us tandr from the right Path, than to lead us with ^ ^ ^M - ; * ' " -^ '- ij^y JW ' I were in iguages. appears that the America^ • Hemif- vc might rry, and f nations, being fo have had, rics, who fpokcn in It would n of their Mate them of the Old e different y have un- Mothcr- asbecn nc- ) the Man- ions of the r Original. It this Dif- :ing a falfc to make us lead us with ( ix ) CJertainty to the Point propofed. Anciettt Tradi- tions are e/Farcd from the Minds of fuch as havd not, or who, uuring fcveral ages, have been, with- out any Helps to prcfervc them j and half the World is exaaiy in this fituation. New Events, and a new Arrangement of Things give Rife to new Traditions, which efface the former, and are themfelves effaced in their Turn. After one or two Centuries have paffcd, there no longer re- main any Marks capable of leading us to find the Traces of the firft Traditions. " The Manners very foon degenerate by Means of Commerce with Foreigners, and by the mix- ture of fcveral Nations uniting in one Body, and by a change of Empire always accoi.^panied with a new Form of Government. How much more Reafon is there to believe fuch a fcnfiblc Altera- tion of Genius and Manners amongft wandering nations become favage, living without Principles, Laws, Education, or civil Government, which might ferve" to bring them back to the ancient Manners. Cuftoms are ftill more eafily deftroyed. A new Way of living introduces new Cufroms^ and thofe which have been forfaken are very fooii forgotten. What Ihall I fay of the abfolutc Want of fuch Things as are moft neceOary to Life ? And of which, the Neceffity of doing without, cauTcs their Names and Ufe to perilh together. « •"iTriM~i^'*'-T-"f'iif — ' M t( ( * ) Laftly, nothing has undergone more fuddctt, frequent, or more furprifing Revolutions than Re- ligion. When once men have abandoned the only true one, they foon lofe it out of their Sight, and find themfelves entangled and bewildered in fuch a Labyrinth of incoherent Errors, Inconfift- cncy and Contradiftion being the natural Inheri- tance of Falfehood, that there remains not the fmalleft Thread to lead us back to the Truth. We have feen a very fcnfiWe Example of this in the laft Age. The Buccameers ef St. Domingo, who were Chriftians, but who had no Commerce except amongft themfelves, in lefs than thirty Years, and through the fole Want of religious Worlhip, Inftpuftion, and an Authority capable of retaining them in their Duty, had come to fuch a Pafs, as to have loft all Marks of Chriftianity, except Baptifm alone. Had thefe fubfifted only to the third Generation, their Grandchildren would have been as void of Chriftianity as the Inhabitants of Terra AnJlraliSy or New Guinea. They might poffibly have preferved fome Cere- monies, the Reafon of which they could not have accounted for, and is it not precifely in the fame manner, that fo many infidel Nations are found to have in their idolatrous Worfhip Ceremonies which appear to have been copied after ours. fudclc tt, than Rc- oned the cir Sight, ildcrcd in [nconfift- il Inhcri- 5 not the e Truth, of this in BomingOy !ommcrcc Lan thirty ' religious capable of to fuch a uiftianity, fifted only idchildren iity as the w Guinea. imc Ccrc- i not have 1 the fame e found to mics which ( xi ) - " The Cafe is not the fame with Refpcft to Languages. I allow that a living Language is fubjeft to continual Changes, and as all Languages have been fo, we may fay with Truth, that none of them have prcfcrved their original Purity. But it is no lefstrue, that in Spite of the Changes, introduced by Cuftom, they have not loft every Thing by which they are diftinguifhcd from others, which is fufficientfor our prcfcnt Purpofe; and that from the Riyulcts arifing from the prin- cipal Springs, I mean the Dialefts, we may afcend to the Mother Tongues themfclves; and that by attending to the obfcrvations of a learned Acade^ mician*, that Mother Tongues are diftinguifhed by being more nervous than thofe derived from them, bccaufe tKey are formed from Nature ; that they contain a greater Number of Words imitating the Things whereof they are the Signs ; that they are Icfs indebted to Chance or Hazard, and that that Mixture which forms the Dialers, always deprives them of fome of that Energy, which the natural Connection of their Sound with the ^Things they reprcfent always give them, ' ♦' Hence, I conclude, that if thofe charader- iftical Marks are found in the American Languages, we cannot reafonably doubt of their being truly original i and, confcquently, that the People who ♦ "M. r Abbe du Bos, his Hiftory of Paiatingand P«etry." #■' ( *» ) ' ijjcak them have paffed over into that Hcmif. phcrc, a (hort Time after the firft Difperfion of Mankind ; efpccially if they are entirely unknowB in our Continent^.'* There is fo much good fchfe m the preceding ebfervations, that I cohW have no hcfitation about the propriety of quoting them at length. I was the more willing to do this, as I felt a dcfire to fxprefs my gratitude to Father Charlevoix for having been, in fome meafurc at lead, by thefc very obfcrvations, inftrumcntal in encouraging mc ^n the inquiry which I now pflFcr to the public, But let it not be fuppofcd, that I mean to fub- fcribe to every thing our author has faid. Though language is of fo much, and of the firft, confer qucnce jn eftimating the affinities [if I may be al- lowed the exprcffion] of nations j and although where there is no affinity in language to be difco- vcred, I fhould be much inclined [without the ftrongcft phyfic^l and other proofs] to doubt whether ever two nations have been the fame, yet I am perfuaded that the phyfical circumftances of figure and complexion, the great features of reli- gious worfli'p, the mythology, and even the tra- ditions, of nations arc circumftances which defcrvc much attention in all our inquiries concerning t A Voyage to North- America, &c. vol. I. p. 40, 41, 4*, 4]« " ( ^ ) / their original, and fpread over the world. It it true, as Charlevoix obferves, that " nothing has undergone more fudden, frequent, or more fupri- fing Revolutions than Religion.'* Thefc revolu- tions are aecomplifhed in the tranfitions of man- kind from the Hates of favages or barbarians to the conditions of civilized men j in the changes of governments; in the admixture of nations j in the progrefs ofrcafon, and fcicnce, and rcfcarchj in the viciffitudes of our individual fortunes j and^ alas, in the unhappy relapfe of nations once civil- ized, or confiderably improved, to the conditioa of lavages again. Local and very narrow circum- ftances often give rife to a great difference in the religious features of a people $ whilft the hand of one man (hall crumble into duft the vaft fabric which it has required the exertions of many na- tions, through a long feries of ages, to raife and fupport. Thefe things are true: they are pro- claimed by the hiftory of mankind ; and many of the proofs of them arc to b^ collcded among the favages of America. But fome of fhe features of religious worlhip, and of fuperftition, are extremely permanent. It was a long time before the Jews could be brought to lay afide their idolatry: but at length they re-, linquifhed it, and adopted the notion of the unity gf pod, which they have rctamed, with a moft •f^ifmff^f."- 1 ->•,■ nr '•I ( »Iv ) commendable zeal and firmncfs, in the midft of all their opprefllons and misfortunes, through many centuries. Ic had long been thought that traces of the religion of the ancient Perfians could be difcovered in America. In the courfe of this inquiry, I fhall fhow that the language of the Per- fians is not unknown in this continent. Yet ma- ny ages muft have clapfed fince there fubfifted between the Perfians, or other Afiatics fpeaking their language, a connexion with the Americans. Many ages, then, have not been fuffieient to de-n ftroy the religion of fire in America. As mankind have ever been remarked for re- taining their errors, fo even the groflfeft features of their mythology arc preferved for a long time, in the midft of all the viciffitudes of fortune to which nations are expofcd. The mythology of Afia is ftilj preferved in America. We trace it with confi- dence among the favages from one end to the other of this continent. True it is, that this my- thology, as well as the religion of the people, is faft difappearing, and a few years will leave hard- ly any veftiges of it behind. But this is not fo much owing to the influence of time itfelf, as to the connexion of the Americans with the Eu- ropean^, and their defcendants. The traditions of nations are, certainly, of much confequence in all our inquiries into their ( XV ) •rigin and migrations. It is true that the traditions of a people cannot be prcfcrved long in a pure, unvitiated ftream. They are mixed with fables, which arc the children of fency, of fear, of fu- prt-ftition, all which fo ftrongly charafterize our kind, but which more efpccially charafterize nations, who are incapable of tranfmitting to their pofterity written monuments of their fucccffes or misfortunes. I fhall afterwards have occafion to fhow, that were it not for the traditions of many American nations we might for ever remain^ in doubt concerning the real origin of thefe people. The great affinity of their languages with the lan- guages of Afia and Europe is not fufficient to prove, that the Americans are emigrants from thefe portions of the world. It only proves that the Americans and many Afiatic and European nations are the fame people. It tells us not whi^ was the parent (lock. And in this inqui- ry, we aflume no theory as eftab]i(hed with ab(b- lute certainty, however it may be fanftioned by the voice of many ages. Authors have laid too much ftrefs upon the circumftance of the refemblance of cuftoms and manners among the Americans and the people of the old-world. But What I have faid of the religion and mythology of nations likewife applies to their cuftoms, and their manners. Thefe are fome> times very permanenti and ought not to be neg- p 'j ' ( xy\ ) Icftcd in an extcnfivc inquiry into the origin of i people. For fome intcrcfting information con- cerning the cuftoms which arc common to America and the north of Afia, I beg leave to refer the reader to the Jrctic Zoology of my learned and much-valued friend Mr. Pennant*. The limits of this memoir will not permit me to dwell upon the fubjcft, which, however, is extremely in- terefting. The phyfical circumftances of figure and com- plexion are worthy of much attention in all our inquiries of this kind. It muft be confcflcd that climate and food, and other phyfical caufes, are adequate to the production of great changes in the conftitution of mankind. But thefe changes are wrought only in a long courfc of time. Many cen- turies have not been able to efface the rcfemblances in figure and complexion of the Americans IlKhe Afiaticsf. Independent on language, on religions. I'll- • See Intrododlon to the Arctic Zoology, p. 260, »6i, 262. Second edition. London: 1791. f "The portrait painter, Mr. Smihert, who accompanied Dr. BtrkiUy, then Dean of Derry, and afterwards Bithop of Cloynt^ from Itdf to Amtrica in 1728, was employed by the Grand Duke of Tufcateft while at Florence, to paint two or three Si- berian Tartars, prefented to the Duke by the Czar of Rujpa, This Mr. Smitrrt, upon his landing at Harraganftt-Btg with Dr. Berktlej, inftantly recognized the Indians here to be thp fiime people at the Siberian Tartars whofe pictures he had mim'l . -*•; ( xvii ) on mythology, on traditions, on cuftoms and inan« ncrs, the naturalift, or man of obfervation, would be induced to declare, that the nations of America and many nations of Afia are the fame. So cer- tain are phyfical tefts, fincc they are confirmed by the fimilaricy of language. I now proceed to fliate the opinions of two late writers concerning the origin of the Americans. Thcfe writers are our learned and excellent coun- tryman Mr. JefFerfon, and the Abbe Clavigero. I think proper to exibit their opinions in this place, becaufc both ofthem have introduced fome oblcr- vations on the fubjedl of the American languages. I am not labouring to be methodical, otherwife I {houid introduce only a part of thefe quotations on the prcicnt occaiion. d taken." The United Statu Eltvattd to Glory and Honour. A Sermon, preached before his Excellency Jonathan Trumbull, Efq. L.L.D. iic.tfc. By Ezra Stiles, D. D. L.L.D. Prefident of Yale College, p. i6 & 17. Second edition. Worcefter« 1785. That very refpefiable traveller Mr. John Bell, of Anter- mony, obferves, " from all the accounts I have heard and read of the natives of Canada, there is no nation in the world which they fo much refemble as the Tongufians. The diftance be- tween them is not fo great as is commonly imagined." Tra- vels from St. Peterjburgh in Ruffia, to various Parts of Afia. vol i. p. 280. Edinburgh: 1788. 8vo. I ihall afterwards ihow, that the language of the Siberian Tartars and that of the Toun- goofi, or Tongufians, have an extenfive rai ^ iiii.wtiiii»ia> i j|« ii ij>jJi:jf »' <:' r < »to i i ' l i ll rll)i(» i lj, i i i l.:tt;i.llj i of ( xxi ) is a great affinity between fome of thofc langiinges> which flicws thaenhey are fprung from the fame parent, namely, the Eudeve, Opata, and Tanahuma- ra, in North-America, and the Mocobi, Tol>a, and Abipona in South-America j but there arc many others alfo, as different from ejch other as the Illyrian from the Hebrew. We can fafely affirm, that there are no living or dead languages which can differ more among each other than the lan- guages of the Mexicans, Otomies, Tarafcas, May- as, and Miztccas, five languages prevailing in dif- ferent provinces of Mexico. It would therefore be abfurd to fay, that languages fo different were , different dialefts of one original. . How is it pof- fible a nation fhould alter its primitive language to fuch a 'egrce, or multiply its diale£ls fo vari- cufly, that there Ihculd not be, even after many centuries, if not fome words common to all, at leaft an affinity between them, or fome traces left of their origin*? II. " The Americans do not derive their origin from any people now cxiiling in the ancient world, or at Icaft there is no grou: Js to affirmit. This inference is founded on the fame argument with the preceding, fmcc if the Americans defcended of any of thofe people, it would be poffible to trace their origin by fome marks in their languages in • I doubt not that were thefe languages compared, with la- bor and attention, fome affinity between them would bs difco- vercd. ■ ,i ii ii y i ^ i j_ i i i j i ,.rft' i .>^ > . i i i i. ( '"'" ) fpitc of the antiquity of thrir reparation : but any fuch traces have not been cli^co^rered hitherto, al- though many authors have fearchcd with the ut- moft attention, as appears from the work of the Dominican Garciaf. We have leifurely com- pared the Mexican and other American languages with many othci: '"hich are now living, and with thofc which are dead, but. have not been able to difcover the Icaft affinity between any of them. The refemblance between the Teotl of the Mexi- cans and the Theos of the Greeks, has induced us fomctimes to compare thofe two languages, but we have never fou.id any agreement between them. This argument is ftrong in rcfpcdt to the Ameri- cans, as they fhew great firmnefs and conftancy in retaining their languages. The Mexicans prefervc their language among the Spaniards, and the Oto- mies retain tluir difficult dialcdt among Spani- m f •• His famous treatifc on the Origin of the Americans, printed in quarto, at Valentia, in 1607, afterwards en'argcd and reprinted in Madrid, in 1729, in folio, is a work of vaft erudition, but almoll totally ufclefs, a» it gives little or no af- fiftance in difcovering truth ; the foundation for the opinions which he maintains concerning the origin of the Americans, are, for the moft part, weak conjeftures founded on the refem- blance between fome of their culloms and words, and thofe of other nations." Thefc are Clavigero's words. Th Hiftory of Mexico, vol. i. p. xxi. Charlevoix (Preliminary Difcourft, p. S J gives fome account of Garcii's work, which 1 have to regret that I have never feen. .iritiiiimiiaiii-i I but any crto, al- ii thr ut- rk of the ?ly com- angiiagcs and with n able to of them, lie Mexi- tduced us ages, but :en them, e Ameri- iftancy in ; prcferve the Oto- ig Spani- American:!, rds en'arged work of vail ttle or no af- the opinions ; Americans, jn the refcm- and thofe of Tht Hipry ary Difcourfi, ich 1 have to ( xxiii ) ards and Mexicans, after two centuries and a half of communication with both. " If, concludes our author, the Americans de- fcended from different families diljicrlcd after the confufion of tongues, as we believe, and have betii fcparated fincc then from thoic oih-rs who peo- pled the countries of the old continent, authors will labour in vain, to feek in the language or cuf- toms of the Afiatics fur the origin of the people of the new world*". My remarks on the preceding quotations from Mr. JefFcrfon and the Abbe Clavigcro are referv- ed for a later part of this work. I now proceed to give Tome acrnunt of my own labours relative to the fuhjeft of this memoir. As early as the year 1787, whilft I was a ftudcnt of medicine in the univerfity of Edinburgh, I endea- vored to difcover, whether there was any refcm- bls.icc between the American and Afutic langua- ges. But although I devoted a good deal of time to the inquiry, I met with but little fuccefi. Up- • The HiftoryofMexico.colleaed from Spaniai and Mex- ican hiftorians, &c. vol ii. p. 208. 20;., 210. EnglifhTrann^t- don. London, 1787. The whole of what Clavigero ha^ faid concerning the population of America dsferves the atten- tion of the readers of this memoir. ™i«*i ah»«*jfa»>--«ii«*fcj^'irtlbik lir>i . ^^WH^jgaa^i i ..^%#^'>^Ai^ the latter liiiry, and alenberg's es of the :Sj princi- are-ftock, perfuaded in time, n the fub- favouritc, lis, though r the qucf- 1^6, when ned friend, ".omparativa rk that has id to arrive jea. The Fered to the orrefted in :o my ftock the enfuing ^e fome ac- and nations in this me- iparativa; Au- juas Europs ct 4to. et Pars ( XXV ) moir. Remarks on their languages arc afterwards to be offered. I (hall then give fome account of the various Afiatic and European nations, whofe languages I have compared with thofe of the Ame- ricans i and Ihall conclude the memoir with fome general obfcrvations relative to the courfe of the migrations of the Americans through the conti- nent, their comparative antiquity, &c. At the head of the column of Americans, I have uniformly placed the Delawares, or as they call themfelves Lenn:-Lennape. I have followed this arrangement becaufe, I believe, we are better acquainted with the language of this tribe, than with that of any other in North- America j becaufe they are acknowledged to be of more ancient efta- blilhment in the country than many others j and becaufe their language appears to have a greater fpread than that of any of the numerous nations of this great continent. The name by which thefe Indians are beft known, that of Delawares, was impofcd upon them by the Engliih, becaufe they inhabited the waters of the river Delaware. The French writ- ers call them Loups. They, I have already ob- ferved, call themfelves Lenni-Lennape, which fignifies the Original People*. • Every thing which the Indians confider to be original is dif- tingui(hed by the addition of the word Ltnni, or Ibmething like it. I I JL I H I ll lll f ji^iiLj^ miftml^ m i imf^tu ' -: ^. . ' ( xxvi ) The Dclawares tell us that they were formerly a very powerful people, inhabiting the country to a great diftance, and fpreading along the fea-fhorc far caft and fouth, &c. 1 he great fpread of their language, which is afterwards to be attended to, feems to fliow, that this muft have been the cafe. All the Indian nations known to me on this fide of the Miflifippi call the Delawares their grand- father, if we except the Six-Nations, the Wyan- dots, Cochnewagoes, and the fouthern tribes, called Chcerake, MuHcohge, Chikkafah, Chok- tah, i^c' Thefe, it will be evident from an in- fpcftion of my vocabularies, as well as from at- tending to what is afterwards to be mentioned, fpeak languages, which though not radically dif- But this word Ukewife ftgnifies common. Thus the Delawares call the common Indian corn (ZeaMays) Lencho/jueem, or the origi- nal corn. Lenni Hittuck fignifies original or common trees. They apply uiis term to the oaks and hickory (different fpecics of the two genera Qucrcus and Juglans, excluding, I fuppofe, from the laft name, the common black-walnut and butter-nut, luglans nigra and luglans cinerea), which they fay are origi- nal, and common all over the ifland, as they call the continent ; whereas trees of other kinds, they tell us, are only to be found in different fpots and in certain places. This is an inte- refling difcrimination. Lenni M'bi is pure water. Unnat^etk, the chub-fiOi, becaufe, they tell us, this fifti is to be found in every river or brook on the continent, &c. It is not ne»ffa- ry, in tlm place, to give any other inftances in elucidation of the word Lenni. ( xxvii ) ferent from that of the Delawares, are, however, much more diftant from it than arc the lan- guages of the Chippewas, Shawnees, Miamis, Narraganfets, and feveral others, which are men- tioned in my larger lifts of American nations above the Senecas, who arc one of the Six-Nations. As far as I have been able to learn any thing on the fubjeft, the Delaware nation confifts of three tribes, viz. the Unamis, pr Wanami, the Unal- achtigo, or Wunalachtigo, and the Minfi, or Mon- fees. It is certain that there had been a fourth tribe, which was fmall, and has paflTed away, leaving not a name behind. " The Mahicanni, or Mohicans, are ?c 'ainly fprung from the Delawares,"but are not ' i 'hended by thcfc lad, as a branch in maki ., p their nation. All the Indian nations to the fouthward and weftward, &c. diftinguifli the Delawares by the name of Waj)anachki, or People towards the rijing of the Jun. "The Wyandots and the Six-Nations call them their nephews, and the Delawares ac- ledge them to be their uncles. Of all the Indian nations which formerly inha- bited, and do ftill inhabit, the countries of Ameri- ca, from the ftate of Maffachufetts down to the Mifrifippi, and between the river Ohio and the Lakes of Canada, none but the Delawares and the Five-Nations had the right to call a general « . r , .. i n «. ,W 1 1 r .II I ■l r ... giry^^^jej , ^^^ , ^^ , ,^ ,,^ j ^^ , ( xxviii ) council. The Wyandots and Hurons might call them occafionally. The Dclawares appear to have been formerly the fuperiors of the other nations of North- America that are comprehended within the limits which I have mentioned. Their tradi- tional hiftory, which is ftill extant, proves this affertion. But by the cunning of the Five- Nations, who are perhaps the greatcft politicians of all the North-American Indians, they were allured into a war with the enemies of the Five- Nations, and finally were conquered. After this ftroke of policy, for the mcannefs of policy is not confined to civilized nations, the Delawares were told, that their legs being now cut off, they muft wear the petticoat, be- come women, turn their hands to the raifing of corn, &c. and leave the higher bufinefs of warring to the conquerors. However in the year 1776, or 1777, when the Five-Nations were ufing all their endeavours to bring all the Indian nations into the war againft the United-States, a Delaware chief, relying upon the faith and promifes of our infant ftates, had the refolution to fay to fome of the chiefs of the Five- Nations, then affcmbled at Fort-Pitt, " that he well remembered, that they had formerly cut off his legs, and made a woman of him, by putting a ( xxix ) petticoat upon him, and by other degrading marks, but that now his legs were grown again -, that he had thrown away the petticoat, and had put on the breech-clout again," adding that, "the land beyond the river Alleghaney was his property." Froiu this period, the Delawares have again afTumed confidcrable authority among the Ame- rican tribes. The- Five-Nations, indeed, afpire to be the fovereigns of all the other tribes, and, for many years paft, have affumed the right of making war, and of concluding peace, according as it beft anfwered their purpofe. 'fhcy have alfo affumed the right of felling land to the Whites. They wifh to be looked upon by the other nations as their guardians, which it muft be allowed they were for many years. But of late years, matters have taken a different turn. The Weftern Nations have, at length, difcovered the intentions of the artful confederacy, and now go fo far as to threaten them with dcftruftion if they do not unite with them, or fulfill the con- dition pf the league. The Delawares are, at prefent, at the head of this league, s^nd relying upon the fidelity of the nations who are combined with them, now give (in fomc mcafure) law to the Five-Nations. The Wyandots, being the guarantees of the Delawares, are under obligation to affift them. ...i - r .,-;fi- i a ; ^ i. . - .^ .i ^ . jtw :i i ^ ...t ^,, . ^. ..^y.!.-..,,.^^ ^ \-^ [ -% \ m^f0m tk \ - ^" ' ^ N(i ( XXX ) # when they fhall become involved in war, and efpe- cially when they fhall be in danger of lofing their lands : for the Delawarcs have now no lands but what have been given to them by the Wyandots, who, at the time the gift was made, engaged to pro- teft the former in the poperty of them againft any invader*. The league of affociation between the Delawarcs and Wyandots was formed in the year 1751. t The Chippewas, who are the fecond tribe mentioned in my lift, evidently fpeak a dialed of the Delaware language. Of this nation I do not think it neceffary to fay any thing farther, as the reader will obtain ample information con- cerning them in Carver's Travels \, a work which is in the hands of almoft every pcrfon who is the Icaft ftudious of the Indian affairs of this country. • The preceding account of the Delawarcs is principally compiled from a colleftion of valnable manufcripts. which were kindly communicated to me by the author, my worthy friend, Mr. John Hcckewelder, of Bethlehem. t Three years Travels through the Interior parts of North- America, for more than five thoufand miles, &c. &c. By Captain Jonathan Carver, of the ProvincUl Troops in America. Philadelphia: 1796, oftavo. I have not an opportunity of confulting any of the London editions of this work. See alfo Voyages and Travels of an Indian Interpre- ter and Trader, defcribing the Manners and Cuftoms of the North American Indians, &c. &c. By I.Long. London: 1791. 4:0. ( XXXI ) idefpe- -ig their nds but pndots, 1 to pro- linft any between \ in the id tribe a dialc(5t on I do thcr, as on con- ic which tio is the country. princ'ipatly pts, which ny worthy ! ofNorth- c. &c. By Troops in re not an ons of this n Interpre- :oms of the '. London: I do not know the meaning of the word Chippewas, orChippeway. They are very dirty Indians. This is taken notice of by the Mahicanni, and other Indians, as well as by the Whites. The Chip- pewas formed a part of the hoftile Indians who defeated General St. Clair, on the fourth of No- vember, 1 79 1. We hav-' aufe to remember them. f The Minfi, or Monfees, called alfo the Minnifinks, I have already faid, formed a part of the Delaware nation. They are now few in number. They are much darker than the greater number of the North- American tribes. The Mahicanni, or Mahiccans,or Mohickanders as the Dutch call them, are certainly a branch of the Delaware-nation, though I have not been able to learn at what time they were united with them. I take thefe to be the people of whom De Laet fpcaks under the name of Man- kikani, and places on the caftern bank of the North-River*. "In his map of Nova Anglia^ Novum Belgium et Virginia, he calls them Mahi- cans. Mr. Charles Thomfon, the rcfpeftable fccretary of the firft American Congrefs, fpeaks • Novus Orbis feu Defcriptionis India Occidcntalis Libri xviii. Authore loanne Do Laet, Antverp. p. 73. Lugd. Ba tav. 1633. folio. ' ""- '"'.'''.' ;"'';'^' ■:^""'| .;'-"^-" :'■'-■■ ;-"''-^-^-; i-,i:'j '. -;; , i .;' ( xxxii ) of the Mohickanders and Mahiccon as two diftinft tribcsf, but this is incorrcdtly done. They are one and the fame people. The whole number of the Mahicanni nation in 1793, was not fuppofcd to exceed three hundred fouls. The greater number of them are fettled at Oneida, in the (late of New- York. '' Some of them, called the Stockbridge-In- dians, are fettled at Stockbridge, in Maffachufetts. The Shawnecs, more properly Sawwannoo*, or Sawanos:^, are a fouthern tribe. They formerly dwelt upon the river Savanna in Georgia, but mi- grated to the northward, and fettled at Pequea, in the county of Lancafter, and ftatc of Pennfylvania. ' One of their tribes, called the Pickawes, gave to this place the name of Pequea. A branch of this nation did not migrate to the northward, but is aflbciated in the confederacy of the Mulkohge, or Creeks. They are called 'the Savanucas, or Sa- vannas: 'They ftill retain the Sawwannoo language. A branch of the Sawwannoo is fettled at a place cal- led Lancelot-Gras, on the weft end of the Miffi- fippi, below the mouth of the Ohio. Thcfe Sa- wanos had been taken prifoners and were carried into Kcntuckey, in 1784. About the year 1785, or 1786, they removed to the place juft men- tioned. f See Mr. Jefferfon'g Notes on the State of Virginia, p. 349. • General Gibfon. % De Laet, p. 77. idiftinft are one :r of the pofcd to number if New- idge-In- chufetts. noo*, or formerly but mi- :quea) in fylvania. ' gave to :h of this d, but is :ohge, or i, or Sa> anguage. place cal- ;hc Mifli- rhcfe Sa- rc carried ear 1785, uft men- rinia, p. 349. P-77- ( xxxiii ) t The empire of the Sawwannoo was once very confidcrable. It extended from Kentuckey fouth- weftward to the Miflifippi. They, as well as the Dclawarcs and many other tribes, were fubdued by the Five-Nations. They are a brave people. 'The Pottawatameh, or Pouteot^jtiies, dwell ' near Sc. Jofeph's and Fort-Detroit. They are a tall and very fine race of Indians. Charlevoix does not hefitate to call them " the fineft Men of Caaada, &CC." * /■ The Miamis, or Miamies, dwell upon the Mia- mi-River, about Fort-St. Jofeph. Above One hundred years ago, they were fettled at the fouth end of the Lake Michigan, at a place called Chi- cagou. t The Ouyat^^jons, or Wiahtanah, are a branch of this nation. // The Meflifaugers, or MeflTafagucs, are a mofc dirty race oflndiafts, refiding about Lakes HuVon and Superior. The Kikkapoos, Oucahipoues, or Kicapous, in- habit the country on Lake-Michigan, and between that lake and the Miflifippi. ' They are thought to be an immediate branch of the Sawwannoo. • A Voyage, &c. vol. ii. p. 9. f Charlevoix, vol. i. P '55- f »iis,-\>Mi tmtimjmi\ ^■"^f.^V . ^^'y ! ^ 'ijii ( ||l ii Vifl'i rti T i I rj^^iwil i i i i i rn iiii ( XXXIV ) The Plankafliaws, more properly Piankifhas, dwell upon the banks of the river Wabafli, near Fort-Ouiatanon. The Algonklns, or Algonqiiins, are Co parti- cularly mentioned by Charlevoix, * Lahontan,f and other writers, that I do not think it ncceflfary to fay any thing concerning them, in this place. The vaft fprcad of iheir language in North-Ame- rica is afterwards to be examined. I fhall only obferve, that Algonkin is a kind of generic name, including a great number of different tribes or na- tions. Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's. Thefe inhabited the banks of the Penobfcot-River and that of St. John's. In the year 1795, the Penob- fcots were fuppofcd to be Icfs than three hundred in number. We are told that thefe Indians are " extremely anxious at the idea of becoming ex- tinft. They caufe their children to intermarry while they are young, they wean their infants ear- ly and do every thing within their power, the prac- tice of temperance excepted, to prefcrve their numbers; but all is vain. J" • A Voyage, See. vol. i. p. T51, 152, 153, 167, 168, &c. f New Voyages to North- America. London: 1735. J The H ftory of the Di^lrift of Maine. By James SuUi- van. p. 56. iTofton : 1795. 3vo. ( XXXV ) /icidians, according to De Laet. Thefe were the Indians ot Cadia, or Acadia, efpccially thole who liv.'d about the Portus Rcgalis. De Laet calls tlicni Souriciuofii.*'''Hc takes notice of their cuftom of plucking out their beards. f Narraganfcts, &c. Under this head, I com- prehend different tribes of New-England, but ef- pccially thofe who were called Narra^anfets, or Narraganfitts. This was once a confiderable tribe, or nation. According to Daniel Gookin, their territory " extended about thirty or forty miles from Sekunk river and Narraganfitt-bay, including Rhode-lfland and other iflands in that bay, being their caft and north bounds or bordc", and fo running wcXlcrly and fouthcrly unto a place called Wekapage, four or five miles to the eaft- ward of Pawcutuk river, which was reckoned for their fouth and weft bounder, and the eaftcrnmoft limits of the Pequots. This fachem held dominion over divers petty governours ; as part of Long- Lland, Block-lfland, Cawefitt, Niantick, and o- thers ; and had tribute from fomc of the Nip- muck Indians, that lived remote from the fca. The chief feat of this fachem was about. Narra-^ ganfitt-bay and Cannonicut-ifland. The Narra- ganfitts were reckoned, in former tinic«, able to • Novus Orbis, p. 52. 'mk. f " Barbam non niii primores alunt, cxteri radicitus evel- lunt.'' Ibid. p. 52. •mm^mmmmmmft V^" 1.;* (' xx»vl ) arm for war more than five thoufand men as anci- ent Indians fay. All do agrcr they were u great people, and oftentimes waged war with the Paw- kunnawkiuts and Maflachufctts, as well as with the Pcquots. The jurifdiftion of Rhodc-Ifland and Providence Plantations, and part of Con- ncfticut people, pnflefs their country. Thcfc In- dians are now but few comparati/ely : all that peo- ple cannot make above one thoufand able mrn.*" Of the Pampticoughs I know but little. They are mentioned by Lawfon, from whom I take the words in their language. Early in the prefcnt century, this nation (or leaft a part of them), the Tufcaroras, and the Woceons, did not live above ten leagues diftant from each other, in North- Carolina.f Lawfon fays, they had but one town, and only fifteen fighting men.;}: I conjefture that Pampticough-Sound in North-Carolina received its name from thefe Indians. Some of the old wri- ters on the fubjeft of America fpeak of a river Pcmtcgoijct ill the northern part of our continent. De Lact thinks this is the celebrated Norumb?- gua, or Agguncia, now know, by the name of • Hiftorical Colledlions of the Indians in New- England, dated 1674. I have not fcen the original work. It is printed by the Maflachufet^s Hiftorical Society, in their CclleAions, vol. i. 1792. ■f A New Voyage to Carolina; containing the exai^d^^p^ tion and natural hiftory of that country. Sec. &c. p. 231. I» ( xxxvii ) Penohfcot. He informs us that the Indians who dwelt about this river, when Champlain explored it, were of the nation of thr Eftechcmincs, and a wandering race* From a fpccimcn of the lan- guage of the Eftcchcmincs, prefcrvcd bf De Lact,f I think it is evident, that they fpake a dvaicdt alii- ed to that of the Dclawares. Tiie Pampticoughs ' of Lawfon did the fame. It " The Sankikani inhabited the wcde-rn banks of the Hudfon's River, or as it was formerly called, the Great North-River, and Manhattrs. ]Dc La- ct, from whom I take the words in tlie language of thcfc Indians, fpeaks of them as the '* infcnfifll- mi hoftes" of the Manhattan, or Manathanes, a fierce tribe, who inhabited the caftern banks of the fame river. if The Senecas, Mohawks, Ooondagos, Cayugas, and Oneidas, conllitut^ the confederacy which has « Novus Orbis, p. 55. f Ibid. p. 54. The following are the numerals of the Eilechemines, according to this au» thor. I. Bfchkvn, 2. Nich, 3. Nach, 4. lau, 5. Prentht, 6. Chachit, 7. Coniachit, 8. Eroviguen, 9. Pechcoquem. 10. Ptrock. De Lact docs not feem to have found any refemblancc 'le- twecn the language of the Eftechemines and that of the ".^'t riquofii, in Acadia. Speaking'of the former he fays, •' ha- bitu corporis, moribus atque inftitutis Soutiquofiis plane fimi- les, lingua discrepant, quod c numerorum nominiV' is, qua hie aflcribere vifum, planum fiet. 1. Bechkon, &c. Nequo dubiumeft in csteris ad eundcm modum difcrepare." J Novus Orbis, p. 72. issr ( xxxviii ) long been known by the name of the Five-Na- tions. This confederacy, or compaft, is called by the Indians themfelves the Stp.ong-House. We are not abfolutely certain when or where this confederacy was firft eftabliflied. It ?ppears to have been above two hundred years ago. Ac- cording to fome accounts, it was on the north, according to others, on the fouth, fide of Lake- Eric. From all the information I have received, I fiippofe it pretty certain that it was fomev/here in the neighbourhood of the great lakes of Canada. Three of the tribes in the confederacy are called the elder, and two the younger tribes. The for- mer are the Senecas, the Mohawks, and the Onon- dagos. The latter tribes are the Cayugas and Oneidas. The Mohawks call themfelves the old- eft branch of all. im it In the year 1608, the confederacy of the Five- Nations occupied the trail of country from tlic caft end of Lake-Erie to Lake-Champlain, and from the Kittatinney and Highlands toI>ake-On- tario and the river St. Laurence. A fhort time before this period, they had carried on a war v/ith the Adirondack, who lived beyond the lakes. In this war they were worfted, owing, no doubt, in a great meafure, to the affiftance afforded to tlie A- dirondacs by the French, who had provided them ■"i?3V"*¥ ;«'-*:'--:'.5.'^i'T •-■^■^ =?*!-:. .:i,*--is-:^p5iiKr^-.-rr ( XXXIX ) Mve-Na- is called -House. /here this jpears to go. Ac- ;he north, of Lake - received, jmewhere if Canada. are called The for- the Onon- yugas and :s the old- thc Flve- from tli£ iplain, and I>ake-On- fhort time a war with lakes. In doubt, in a 1 to tlie A- vided them with fire-arms, which the Five-Nations had never feen before. That policy which has long fo ftrikingly charac- terifed the confederacy, at length induced them to make a peace with the Adirondacs and the French. But they were incapable of continuing in peace. Thirfting after glory, and a more ex- tenfive range of country, they turned their arms againft the Lenni-Lennape, or Delawares, the Mahicanni, or Mahiccans, and other tribes, and in the end compelled them to acknowledge the Five-Nations as their fuperiors. I have already alluded to this conquefl: in fpeaking of the Dela- wares. I remarked that they do not fecm willing to continue any longer under the yoke of the con- federacy ; and it is not unlikely that the league which the Delawares have formed with the weft- crn tribes may eventually terminate the exiftence of the confederacy. Although the Five-Nations have taken to the cultivation of the ground, they are not increafing. On the contrary they are evidently dimlnifliing, in numbers. o» Since the war of 1757, the Mohawks have fe- parated. A part of the nation is fettled on the Grand- River, near Niagara, and the reft at the back of the bay of Q^jenty, or Kcnty, about forty- >l"i ■■U'^ . ( xl ) ■ eight miles above Cataraqui, which is the capital of the fettlements of the Loyalifts, on the River St. Lawrence*. /' '' The Tufcaroras, or Tufkeruro, form a fixth tribes in the confederacy, which is now fometimes called the Six-Nations. They were driven from the borders of North-Carolina by the.Chcerakc and Englifh, in the early part of the prefcnt cen- tury. They arc faid to have been received into the confederacy, " upon a fuppofition that they were originally of the fame (lock with the Five- Nations, becaufe there is fome fimilitudc between their languagesf." It is evident, from an infpec- tion of my vocabularies, that there is an affinity between the language of the Tufcaroras and that of the other nations in the confederacy. // The Cochncwagoes are a branch of the Mo- hawks. Long fay^s, they are called- the " Pray- ing Indians, from the circumftance. of their chiefs wearing crucifixes, and going through the ftrcets of Montreal with their beads, begging alms|." * Long, pi II. f The Hiftory of the Province of New-York, from the firft Difcovery to the year i73z. By William Smith, A. M. p. 47. Philadelphia: 1792. 8vo. J VoyagesandTraveU, &c.p.6. The whole of my account of the Cochnewagoes is taken from this work. The inverted commas fliow where I have copied the author's words. )Uk««^ta«kM t capital c River n a fixth metimes ren from 'heerakc cnt cen- ved into :hat they he Five- bctween 1 infpcc- n affinity and that the Mo- " Pray- eir chiefs le ftrcets alms|." rom the firft i. M. p. 47. my account 'he inverted rds. (xH ) Their villagr, called Cahnua^a, or Cocknawa- ga, nine miles above Montreal, contains about two hundred houfes : the inhabitants amount to about eight hundred, and are continually increafing. They arc in a great degree civilized and in- duftrious. Their hunting grounds arc within the limits of the United-States, « at a coniiderablc dif- tancc from the village, round Fort-George, Ti- conderago, and Crown-Point, where they kill bea- ver and deer, but not in fuch great abundance at prefcnt as they did formerly, the country being better inhabited, and the wild animals, from the prefcnt ftate of population, being obliged to feek a more diftant and fecurc retreat." Thefe Indians fow corn, " and do not depend like other nations folely upon hunting for fupportj but at the fame time, they arc not fond of laborious work, con- ceiving it only fuited to thofe who arc Icfs free, and retaining fo much of their primeval valour and independence as to annex the idea of flavery to every domeftic employment." /' The Wyandots evidently belong to the fame ftock with the Five- Nations. Thpy refide prin- cipally about Fort-St. Jofeph and Detroit. They were conquered by the confederates and compell- ed to fuc for peace, ** after they had many years wandered beyond the Lakes." Lewis Evans thinks the Wyandots arc the farpe people with the Foxes, '' m i.ii(i«K-iK--^^:Vaai; iaa»;..;r«Mv^ ;^i^;^ ^^ IK,J, mm m -Hi r ;j^^' ( xlii ) or Outagamis.* I have already obferved that they entered into a league of affociation with the De- lawares in the year 1751- T'^^y -^' l'l. g auHi piffi Ty . xt they e De- ; called V^anats. r infor- ioux of hefc In- iC coun- r in the to Lake \ by the Sipi, or Detroit ure that yandots. e. De Lact. the river •eat river y of con- De Laet flagenles. the ftock iphkal, and hiladelphia: river Hoflic- ( Xliii ) I am ncKt to fpeak of the Checrake. " Their national name, fays Adair, is derived from Cbee-ra, *' fire," which is their reputed lower heaven, and hence they call their magi, Chseni-tahge, men pof- fefTed of the divine fire."* *^a^hc country, fays the fame writer, lies in about 34 degrees north latitude, at the diftance of 340 computed miles to the north- weft of Charlcftown, 140 miles weft-fouth-weft from the Katahba nation, and almoft 200 miles to the north of the Muflcohge or Creek country. •j-'^'' The Cheerake were once a very powerful nation of Indians. About fixty years ago, they had fix-- ty-four towns and villages, which were very po- pulous. At that time, they are fuppofed to have amounted to upwards of fix thoufand fighting men. J In the year 1769, an intelligent gentleman (whofe name I do not think it prudent to mention, as he is ftill living, and has occafional intercourfe with the Indians) made an eftimate of the number of hunters in the Cheerake nation, and found them to be twenty-two hundred. In the year 1793, the fame gentleman, then in Philadelphia, fuppo- fed there were not more than fifteen hundred hun- ters. || This diminution is not fo great as might have been fuppofed. • Page 226. t Ibid. j Ibid. p. 227. II Among our favages, the term warrior is a very ambigu- ous phrafc, fur every perfon is a warrior who has taken % ( xliv ) The Checrake are divided into the Upper, or Ovcrhill, Cheerake,and theLower-Chccrake. The former call themfelves Chcelake. They do not pronounce the letter R at all. The latter call them- felves Checrake, or Cherokces, and do not (and I am told cannot) pronounce the letter L. There is about as much difference between the dialcfts of thefe two branches of the Cheerake as there is be- tween the dialefts of the Chikkafah and Choktah. The Cheerake tell us, that when they firft arri- ved in the country which they inhabit, they found it poffeffed by certain " moon-eyed-people," who could not fee in the day-time. Thefe wretches they expelled. This curious fad was communi- cated to me by Colonel Leonard Marbury, a very intelligent gentleman, who has put me in poffcffi- on of much important information concerning the fouthern Indians. Poffibly, the moon-eyed-people fcalp. The term hunter is lefs ambiguoas. It includes all thofe who are ftriaiy fpeaking hunters, or capable of fupport- ing themfelves by the labours or pleafures of the chafe : it does not inclu^ e the old men, who have ceafed to be hunters. 1 need not fay, it excludes women and children. By a mo- derate computation, it may be fuppofed, that there are three women, children, and old men to every hunter. The favages lofe great numbers of their children by worms, and other dif- eafes, which partly explains the reafon why the number of hunters compared to that of the women, &c. is eftimated fo high. Moreover, great numbers of the hunters are young fel- Jews, who are unmarried. ,■ > .., w i i r^ - dj.- ( xlv ) per, or c. The do not , thcm- : (and I 'here is lefts of e is be- loktah. rft arri- y found c," who vretches mmuni- r, a very poffcfli- ning the i-peoplc eludes all if fupport- ; chafe : it be hunters. By a mo- e are three rhe favages i other dif- number of ftimated fo ! young fel- drivcn away by the Chcerake, were the anceftors of the Albinos who inhabited the Ifthmus of Dari- en, and of whom Lionel Wafer has given us an account. Be this as it may, it is certain, that the Albino- variety of mankind is often continued for a very long time. The late Mr. M'Gilwray informed me, that the Cheerake are of more ancient eflablifliment in the country eaft of the Miflifippi than the Mulkohge. Accordingly, the former call the latter their younger brothers. The Cheerake arc of a lighter colour than the greater number of the North- American Indians that are knovfrn to me. I fliall afterwards endeavour to (how, that the language of the Cheerake is not radically different from that of the Six-Nations. The Mufkohge, Mufcokees.or Creeks, as they are moll commonly called, are a confiderable confederacy. In the time of Adair, their country extended one hundred and eighty computed miles, from north to fouth. ''' It was ficuated nearly in the centre between the Cheerake, Georgia, Eaft and Weft Florida,, and the Choktah and Chikkafah nations.* ' This confederacy is made up of many • Adair, p. 257. i.=i W4 ..h*; ( xlvi ) tribes, or remnants of conquered nations. They have, or had a few years ago, above fixty towns, in more than thirty of which the Muflcohge lan- guage is fpoken.f The Mulkohge receive their name of Cn-eks becaufe the country which they inhabit abcjunds in creeks, Tnall bays, rivulets, and fwarr.ps.-j; The Creeks are divided into Upper and Lower Creeks. The former inhabit the upper part of the territory, which is very hilly. The latter in- habit the lower country, which is level. The Lower Creeks are belt known by the name of Se- minoles. The Mufkohge, properly fo called, de- nominate the Seminoles their coufms : and the latter call the former their uncles; thus admitting that they are their fuperiors, and anceftors. 1 have feen, and read with attention, a manufcript writ- ten by an American officer, in which it is aflerted, that the Seminoles are the anceftors, or « original ftock of the Creek-Nation." This account is very different from others which I have received, and on which I place more dependance. About the year i775..the Mufkohge confede- deracy was thought to confift of about three thou- fand and five hundred men fit to bear arms*. In t On the authority of my friend Mr. Wm. Bartram. M. S.fcvesmc. X Adair, p. 257. ^ • Adair, p. 259. ^-%l3L'?^^t^**'«««'^w*»--?^'***'-» "' p^pnp ( xlvii ) • tlie year 1791 > the gentleman alluded to when I treated of the Chccrake, made an cftimatc of the numbers of the Upper-Creeks. At this time, there were. three thoufand and five hundred hun- ters. Wlicn the Scminoles were included, the number amounted to five thoufand hunters. From the year 1768, to the time jufl: mentioned, the Creeks had cncreafcd about one hundred. s*. In Bartram. P- 259- The Mu(l the number of their hun- ters did not exceed five or fix hundred. W ' ;-! From the accounts which I have colleded from the Chikkafah, I conclude that they croflcd the MilTifippi, nearly oppofitc the Chikkafah-BlufF. They aftlire me, that they arc only a fmall part of the original nation, and that the greater part of their anceftors ftill dwell beyond the Mifliflppi, towards ^'f. borders of the Pacific-Ocean. I have not learned the prccife period at which the Chik- kafah croflcd the Mifllfippi. It is certain, how- ever, that it was fome lime after the arrival of the Spaniards in Mexico. This inference is fafe- ly deduced from a well -eft ablifhed faft, viz. that they and the Choktah brought with them from the country weft of the Great-River, thofc beautiful horfes which are called the Chikkafah and Chok- tah breeds. The Seminolc-horfes, or thofe fine creatures which are brcdamongthe Lower-Creeks, are of the Andalufian ftock, and were introduced by the Spaniards of St. Auguftine. The Chikkafah are very particularly mention- ed by the hiftorians of the expedition of Fernan- • Page 352. ■*m>i ,1 MliiiiWI ( xlix ) do (le Soto into Florida. The Portugucfe au- thor of Klvas calls their town Chicafa*. Garcil- laflb de la Vega calls it Chicavaf. From the ac- counts of thcfc two authors, the firfl; of whom ap- pears to have been a faithful recorder of fafts, ic fcems pretty certain, that a part of the Chikkafah nation was fettled to the eaft of the Milllfippi, as early as the year 1541. Bernard Romans informs us, that the Chi! kafah are the only favages he has heard of, *' who make tlieir females obfcrve a feparation at the time of tht'xr Menfes (fome ancient almoft extirpated tribes to the northward only excepted, and thefc ufed to avoid their own dwelling houfes) j the women then retire into a fmall hut fet apart for that purpofc, of which there arc from two to fix round each ha- bitation, and by them called moon-houfes.J" Our author's information could not have been exten- five. I believe it is certain that [befides the Chik- kafah] the Choktah, the Cheerake and the Creek* obfcrve a fimilar feparation. Among all thefc tribes [not to mention many others], the men at • A Relation of the lavafion and Conqueft of Florida by the Spaniards, under die command of Fernando de Soto. p. 98, &c. Englifli Tranflation. London: 1686. 8 vo. t Hiftoire de la Conquete De la Floride, &c. vol. ii. p. 364, &c. ALeide: 1731. t A Concife Natural Hiftory of Eaft and Weft-Florida, p. 64. h . ^ li i M Hliiiiilffiiii<|- II .i-iwlii-intll I i-r ■■ ' '-1 ^,-jJ..^^ .-.. L^.^-*- , .. , ^^ , .-^ •»*» ..«-M W i t. 1 1 ,■'»!'. ' : I ih#H ECl 1|1 thclc limes rcfiife to have any connt-aion with the women. They will not -veii cat out of the nime fpoons the latter have made ufe of. The Choktah, or Chatkas, inhabit the country cart of the MilTifippi, to the fouthward of the Chik- kafah and Cheerakc, and weft of the Mi.flcohgc' «* Their country is pretty much in the form of an oblong fquare."* I have already faid, on the authority of Adair, that the Chikkafah, the Choktah and the'Chok- chooma '^' came together from the weft as one fa- mily." That they croflcd the Miflifippi at the fame time I think very doubtful. I believe that the Choktah came in much later. ' It is certain, hawcver, that th;e Choktah came into Florida later than the Creeks. The latter call the Choktah their younger brothers. In the year 1793, there were fuppofed to be at leaft fix thoufand hunters of the Choktah nation. )> "The Choktah are well known by the name of the Flat-Heads, becaufe they formerly compreffed the heads of their children with a bag of Hind. I believe, this praftice is now laid afide. * The Katahba were once a confiderable nation. Their country was bounded on the north and north- * Adair, p. 282. 1S|- ( li ) witli the he fame country be Chik- iifkohge.' rm of an )f Adair, le'Chok- is one fa- )pi at the lievc that s certain, )rida later Choktah [ to be at natior>. : name of ampreffcd fHind. I )le nation, and north- cafl by North- CaroHna ; on the eafl: and fouth by South - Carolina , and about Ibuth-wcfl by the na- tion of the Cht'crakc. About twenty-five years ago, their chief fcttlcnitiit was about one hundred and'forty miles from the Clicerakc, and about two iumdrcd miles diflant from Cliarlellon. In the infancy of the fettlcment of South-Caro- lina, the Kataliba could muller Hftcen hundred fighting men. About the year 1743, this nation confided of almofl: four hundred warriors, of a- bove twenty different dialefts. ■ I am informed,* that the Katahba have an an- niverfary meeting, intended to commemorate their former greatnefs. This mud, indeed, be a melancholy taflc. But nations who are fad pair- ing to defti udtion mull be contented to wrap thcm- felves up, for a time at lead, in refledions of a fe- rious kind. It is on fuch occafions t!^at they Ihould learn to know and acknowledge the cxiftencc and the power of a creator, who formed all nations, and fcatters them abroad ; who prefcrves and increaf- f s them ; who diminiflies or crumbles them to nought. Thy power, O God ! has no limits ; and are we worthy of thy prel'crving care when we * By my friend Alexander Martin, Efq. formerly Governor of North-Carolina, and at preftnt a member of the Sci;ate of the United-States. . — «■ I iiiiiHlni*Mi I ~' "''-i" 'fc ii ; i n i " b- ■'' :■■''■' h. ■<rms im- mine this jt what I the coun- ig of the ig to the the Tuf- , &cc.'% vauremau id twenty tn at pre - 58. Gottin- )r fometimes • ■"" ' iifg *' ( liii ) The Natchez defcrve more of our attention than moft of the nations whom I have mentioned. But the limits neceflarily allotted to this work will not admit of my fpeaking of them as I could wifli. I mud, therefore, content myfelfwith referring the reader, who is defirous of obtaining informa- tion concerning them, to Charlevoix*, Du Pratzf, and other writers. - ^ A number of families of the Natchez are fet- tled among the Creeks. They now fpeak the language of the Creeks;};. Some families arc fet- tled among the Chikkafah, and fpeak the Chik- kafah-languagc. The Mexicans are fo well known to us, that I do not think it neceflary to fay any thing con- cerning them in this place. The courfe of their migration to the country in which they founded their empire, will afterwards be taken notice of. I fhall alfo endeavour to fhow, that they are of very ancient eftablifliment on this continent. The Poconchi, as I call them, inhabited the country about^Guatimala and Honduras. I have * Vol. II. p. 189, &c. ' f The Hiftory of Louifiana, &c. p. 29*, &c. Englilh Tranflation. London: 1774. 8vo, X So at leaft I was informed by Mr. M'Gilwray, in 1790. But, in 1 794., an Indian interpreter affured me, that thefe Natchez ftill retain their proper language. ^ik m^ ik i> n' . ' ihtfii.|l) ^i. «ii )'n ^> i . c» t r .t r » i ii > Bri " wi8 «n Waai i a <«i^m ha w i ft j i'fe*f f'l^i ( Hv ) not learned what was their proper name. Gage, from whbm I take the Poconchi- words in my vo- cabularies, calls the language Poconchi, or Poco- man. I know nothing of this languap;e but wiuit I learn from the author juft mentioned*. The Darien-Indians inhabited the Illhmus of Darien. The Jaioi,. the Arwaccjc, and the Shebaioi in- habited the country of Guaiana, in South-Ameri- ca. De I.aet, who is my authority for the words in the languages of thefe Indians, fpeaks of the Jaioi as inhabiting a great extent of country, and of their language being extremely commonf. They perforated their noitrils and their lower lips. Brafilians. Indians of BrafiL Peruvians. Indians of Peru.- Of thefc I can fay nothing new. I have ventured to conjefture that they are the defcendants of the ToltecasJ. • A New Survey of the Weft-Indies. Being a Journal of t\\-ee thoufand and three hundred miles Avithin the main land of America. By Thomas Gage, the only Proteftant that was ever known to have travel'dthofe parts. London: i65g. 8vo. .(- " Tcdcrum gens uti latiffime patet, ita k idioma ipforum maxi.ne commune eft in illis panibus." Novus Orbis, p. 642. t Papers relative to certain American Antiquities. By Winthrop Saigent, EU]. and by Benjamin Smith Carton, p. 8. Philadelphia: 179'*. 4to. "^^r of ( Iv ) The Chilefe are the Indians of Chili, in South- America. Marcgrav fo particularly mentions their pradiice of pulling out their beards, &cc. that I cannot refrain from quoting, at length, the words of the author. " Capite ut plurimum funt gran- diufculo & facie lata, imberbes, quia illam cvel-' lunt duabus mytulorum conchis, arde connexis, & una parte firmiter ligatis, quas fecum & qui- dem ad coUum appenfas geftant : et enim non tan- tum e mento & genis, fed & pudendis partibus omnes pilos evellunt, tarn marcs quam femins, & primum cineribus calidis illos fricant, ut ita faci« liusradicitus evellant*." If this paffage had been carefully confulted by Dr. Robertfon, and many other writers, we fhould not, perhaps, have been fo frequently told, that the Americans are by na- ture deftitute of beards : a fcandalous afltrtion, which fhows the love of theory, and the deficiency of refearch. ' .; u, ' • The Caraibes, or Caribbees, are well known by thefc names. Th^j#are the natives of the Antilles. ' They are of opi-iion that they originally came ■ from fome pars of the country ofGuaiana : an opi- nion which fecms to be well founded* P'or there is a very ftriking affinity bctweea their language.' • Georgli Maicgvavii do Licbflad^ Traftatus Topuj.^;ai)h- icus & Metcorologicus Brnfilia:, cum Eclipfi lolari ; ijuibiis additi funt illius k aliorum Commcntari: De Erafilienftum Sc Chllenruim Indole & Lingua, p. 27. Amllebdaini, 16^8, Folio. -■' 'f ■ jr 1 1 ni l ri.» ii |jj i j«,«(Mj" 'ji; ■ ' —"* I , fti I It- < ", ". ' i f K. ' W ' ( Ivi ) and that of the Jaioi, one of the nations of Guaia- na. In a map publlfhed by Kircher, in his Mun- dus Subtcnaneus, the country of Guaiana is called Caribana, Rochcfort derives the Caraibes from Florida*. **' HAVING thus finilhed my account [if it de- fcrvcs that name] of the principal American tribes and nations whofe languages are compared with thofe of the Afiatics, &c. I now proceed, agree- ably to the order which I have propofcd to my- felf, to make fome remarks concerning the Ame- rican languages. Here, however, I Ihall not take up much time. The fuU difcufllon of the fubje<5t is refervcd for my Philofophical and Hijiorical In- quiry. I think, it is evident from an infpedtion of my vocabularies, that the languages of all die Ameri- can nations in iny larger lifts, beginning with the Delawares, and ending with the Acadians, Penob- fcots, Sankikani, and Pampticoughs, may, with confidence, be referred to one great ftock, which I call the language of the Lenni-Lennape, or De- kwares. It is this language which has fuch a vaft * Hiftoire Morale des lies Antilles de L'Amerique. Tome fccond. p. 158, &c. A Lyon: 1667. w >i pii^|« rmru i " ' ' ' i »wwp''rLi I mmU i ^ t • -„»'nrT?'^r"; with ( Ivii ) Iprcad in America. It had no other limits but the Atlantic-Ocean on the eaft. We trace it with confidence to the Miflifippi on the weft : on the north we find it far beyond the lakes of Canada i on the fouth in North- Carolina, as among the Pampticoughs -, and in the very extremity of the American-Union, or Georgia, among die Sawwan- noo. Future refearches will doubtlefs difcover it in the vaft countries [unknown to philofophers j travcrfed but by traders and by Jefuits] which are comprehended between the Miflifippi and the Pacific-Ocean. By the afliftance of a light, glimmering and perhaps fomcwhat illufive, a light which time Ihall render ftronger, and more fure, I trace the language of the Delawares in South-America. I fhall not be furprifed to find it among the mife- rablc and hardly human PeflPerais, in Tie/ra del Fuego. The language of the Delawares is fpoken by many other nations befides thofe whofe names oc- cur in my vocabularies. A barren lift of thefe nations could > Jord but little inftrudion to the philofophical reader : and fuch a lift is all I could attempt to give in this limited view of a fubjed lb ' extenfive. I fliall content mylelf, therefore, with obferving, that it is the dialeds of the Delaware if' III pi v?;j;i A'l: ( Iviii ) language which arc fo generally to be met with in the'relations of the early vifitors of the countries of North- America, to the northward of theChee- ,ake, and other tribes, who arc commonly called the Southern- Indians. A very refpedable American author has ima- gined, that the Indian tribes to the northward of the river Saco fpake a language very difi^rcnt from that of the tribes to the fouthward of the fame river. He informs us, that « there was not one word" of the language of the tribes of Pe- nobfcot and St. John's, who dwell to the north- ward of the Saco, in the Indian Bible of Mr. El- liot*. If this alT^rtion were well-founded, it would be a very intercfting faft; and would, in- deed, go far to prove, « that the river Saco was an important dividing line between the Savage nations of the eaft and weft parts of New-En- Mandf." But it is certain, that there is no radi- cal difference between the language of the tribes of Penobfcot and St. John's, and that which is preferved in the Indian Bible juft mentioned. It is well known that Mr. Elliot tranflated the Bible into the language of the Natics, a confider- able Indian tribe in New-England. It is certain, that .! e Ni xb fpake a di-.led of the language of . See ]*3ge Sullivan', lliftory of the Diftria of Maine. , i Ibid. p. 266. p. 265. *^ ( lix ) t with in :ountries ^e Chee- ily called has ima- ihward of ditfcrcnt rd of the e was not )CS of Pc- he north- f Mr. El- >unded, it would, in- r Saco was lie Savage New-En- is no radi- * the tribes at which is ioned. inflated the a confider- t is certain, language of \n& of Maine. 266. 1 the Delawares ; and it is evident, from my voca- bularies, that the tribes of Penobfcot and St. John's, fpeak a dialeft of the fame general ftock. Confequently, the Sacooijght not to be confidcr- cd as an important line of divifion between tribes fpeaking languages efientially different. In other rcfpefts, it may have been a line of much confe- quence:|:. ■ -4v? The vaft fpread of the language of the Dela- wares in North-America is alfo evinced by the In- dian names of many of the waters, the mountains, and the vallies of the country. It is a faft, that- from the Atlantic to the Miflifippi, a large propor- tion of the rivers and creeks, in particular, are ftill beft known by the names [or rather corruptions of the names] impofed upon them by the Dela- wares, and their brethren. I fhall fully illuftrate this aflertion in a map which is intended to be pre- fixed to my large work relative to this country. This is not the place to do it at length. I may obferve, however, that Maflachufetts, Connedri- cur, Monongahella, AUegheney, Mudcingum, Sa- vanna, and Miflifippi itfelf, are all Delaware words*. I believe, the fame may be faid of the I " When the eaftern Savages, fays Judge Sullivan, made an hoftile expedition v,oilward, they were not feen to come further northward than to Saco-River," 8cc, The Hiftoiy, &c. p. 264, 265. * I ufc the word Delaware in this and many other places not merely with a reference to the Lenni-Lennape, or Delaware$, i If if ' -l g W ' WW I**' .!'' J ■ n ■ h ■ I ( IX ) Miflburi. Ohio and Sufquchaniw arc not Dela- ware words. ■ ♦eaJ^'t^' All the more favagc na .ons of North-America were wanderers. Few of them are now found in the fame parts of the continent in which they were originally difcovered. We have fcen the Sawwannoo on the banks of the river Savanna, in Georgia, and in the neighbourhood of the Mifli- fippi. At a later period, they inhabited the coun- ty of Lancafter, where they are no Ion er fcen. They are now fcattered in very different ^ arts of the countries north and fouth of the Ohio. The Delawares have long fince relinquifhed the beau- tiful river which bore their name*. The Ma- hicanni and the Minfi have alfolhifted their feats. In fhort, it is a very rare circumftance for any tribe to continue in the fame diftrid for half a dozen years. This obfervation certainly applies to all oqr In- dians : but I believe it more intimately applies to the tribes of the Delaware ftock, than to thofe of the Huron, Cheerake, and other races. If this fufpicion be well founded, we are furnifhed with one of the reafons why the language of the Dela- properly fo called, but alfo to the Chippewas, Sawwannoo, and the other nations fpeaking dialefts of their languages. * Thefe Indians called the Delaware Lennapewi-Hittuk, which fignifiies Indian-River. ^• , «6i )t Dela- ^.merica found in ch they fcen the ^anna, in le Mifll- le coun- "cr fecn. : parts of o. The he beau- :he Ma- eir feats. for any for half a 11 ogr In- applies to D thofe of i. If this flied with iie Dela- Sawwannoo, jguagcs. lewi-Hittuk, ( Ixi ) wares has fuch an immenfe fprcad through the continent. Wanderers, from caprice or ncceflityi conquerors, in purfuit of empire and of glory, neccflarily fpread their language far. The Delaware language is faid to be deftitute of the letters F and R*. This with refpedt to the language of the Delaware-Indians, properly fo called, is moft probably the cafe. But it is an obfcrvation which by no means applies to all the dialefts of the Delaware language. The letter R occurs in the language of the Chippcwasf, the Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's^, the Sanki- kanill, and fcveral other tribes, who are, undoubt- edly, of the Delaware ftock. Moreover, this let- ter frequently occurs in the language of the Indi- ans of Pennfylvania, towards the end of the laft century j and there can be very little doubt, that the author of the vocabulary which is my autho> * Zeilberger, p. z. f The following words, from Long, will (how that the R is not wanting in the Chippewa language, viz. Marnay, many ; Mergummegat, news, or in- telligence ; Warbegum, the globe, or earth ; Pemartus, health ; Warhijhcar, white; Otarpeet, under; not to mention many others. I Thefe Indians call the hair Peerfio ; brother Neecheer, and daughter Wetdoxcr. II In the language of thefe Indians, Wye^; is head; Mytrach, hair ; Rinjkan, the fingers Promine, the thi^h ; Soukeree, rain, and ^raw, a dog. De Laet, p. 75,76. ! I 'W Itf llv ij.i 1 < ( Ixii ) rity for this aflertion, is fpcaking of the Deliwarcs thcmfclvcs^. • I do not know that the letter F is to be found in the languages of the Delaware (lock. Lahon- tan fays the EiTanapes and the Gnacfitares, who live upon a river, called the Long-River, to the weft of the Miffifippi, have ir////«, an old man ; Kitari'ut, w fe ; Aranck, ftars ; S'uckra, rain ; Mijrack, hair ; Hijrane, the tongue ; not to mention many others. See P'oca- bularium Barbaro-Virgineorum, printed in 1696. In the lan- guage of the Delawares, according to Ziclberger, Lemo is a man, and Milach, hair. In the fame language, according to Heckewe1'''T, Almk is a ftar. f New . oyages, &c vol. ii, p. 303. • Page 231. f They call God Efekecfah, and a dog Rfa. X Thefe Indians call our wild- turkey [Meleagris Gallo- pavo of Linnaeus] Fukkit, and the forehead Etefun. ia;-VV.T nifc irMJi hwares ♦ found Lahon- es, who , to the gnorant for the I them, ive met imon in d the F .kafahij:, fubjed, :er R, or CO me to words in ti old man ; raci, hair ; See f'oca- n the lan- , Lenm is a xording to grjs Gallo- un. ( Ixiii ) be a matter of lefs coniequence than is generally fuppofed. I have already obferved, that the Up- per or Overhill Chccrake make ufe of the letter L, and not of the R, whilft the Lower-Cheerakc make ufe of the R, and not of the L. Thus the former call thcmfclves Cheelake, the lattti Chec- rake. The former call fire Cheela, the latter Che<'- ra*. Above one hundred and fifty years ago Hu- ger Williams obferved the great variety ( ? dialedts and proper fpccch of the Indians of England, " within thirty or forty miles of tacii other," and exemplified it in the word yfnum, a dog. " Jnum, the Cowwefet dialed -, /lyim, the Narroganfct -, yirum, the Quunnipicuck ; Jlum, the Neepmuck. So that, fays our author, although fome pronounce not L nor R, yet it is the mod proper dialcft of other places, contrary to many reportsf." The language of the Five-Nations next claims our attention. It has long been known that all • In like manner, I have remarked, that fome of the Oneidas ufe the L, where others, in the fame village, ufe the R. Alehaul (or Alehall) and Erhar are the words for dog in the language of this tribe. f A Key into the Language of America : &c. London : 1643. I have not been able to procure the original work. My information concerning it is derived from the Colliaions of the Maffachufetts Hiftorical Society, for the year 1794, vs!. iiri. I I i I .. .Ilfflli \k:' i!^l.:i ( Ixiv ) the tribes in this confederacy fpcak dialtfts of the fame language.- The affinities of thcfc dialers will be evident from an examination of my voca- bularies. The late Sir William Johnfon remarked, that there is '• fome difference of dialed among the Six-Nations thcmfelvcs i but this is little more than what is found in all tlie European dates*." The dialcdls of the Mohawks, Oneidas, and Onondagos differ but little from each other. Thofe of the Cayugas and Senecas are more re- mote, and make, I think, a nearer approach, than the three others, to the languages of fome of the Southern tribesf . The letters M and P do not occur in the lan- guage of the confederate!, '* nor can they pro- nounce th» "" , f.v/! Sir William Johnfon, but with the utn.oft QilficultyJ." Th< ; 'ifcaroras, whp have formed a part of the confederacy ever fince 1712, fpcak a lan- guage radically the fame as that of the other tribes. There is, however, much lefs affinity between the dialcft of the Tufcaroras, and thofe of the other tribes in the confederacy, than there is between the dialedts of thofe other tribes themfelvcs. • Tranfadions of the Royal Society. Vol. 63. f See Appendix, for farther information concerning the language of the confederates. J Tranfaftions cf the Royal Society. L cftsof the fc dialcds my voca- rtmarkcd, ft among 1 is little European MclaS) and ch other, more rc- )ach,than mc of the the lan- they pro- tfon, but a part of ik a lan- ler tribes, twcen the the other between 'es. 1. 63. cerning the L / ,.-»>:,. V ^ :? ^vV V IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 ^ 12.2 13 A mill I.I 14.0 2.0 m Photographic Sciences Corporation 1.25 ||U 1.6 < 6" — >■ 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716)872-4503 R' CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical MIcroreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques I ( Ixv ) , * I have already faid, chat the Cochncwagocs were fdrmcrly a part of the Mohawks. Their lan- guage, of courfe, is that of the confederacy. I have colledled but very few words ir the lan- guage of the Wyandots. They are fufficient to fhow that their language is a dialed of that of the Six Nations. The fame remark applies to the languages of the Naudoweffies, and the Hoche- lagenfes. ^' Of the Erlgas I know but little. We are told, that they were of the fame original ftock with the confederates, and that their language partook of that of the Tufcaroras*. I have not been able to procure any words in the dialed of this tribe. I believe it is univerfally admitted, that the lan- luage of the Six-Nations and that of the Dela- warcs and their brethren are radically different. k • Lewis Evans's Geographical, Hiftorical, Political, Philo- fophical and Mechanical Eflays. The Firft, &c. p. 13. This aothor iniorms us, that the Erigas " were feated on Ohio and its Branches, from Beaver-Creek to the Mouth of th» Quiaaghtena-River. The far greater pan hare been extir- pated, fome incorporated into the Seneca^- nd the reft have retired beyond the woodlefs Plains ove' ?. Miffifipp>, and left the Confederates entire Mailers of all the Country. From the Ruins of the Eriga Towns and FortrefTes we fuppofe they were the moft numerous of any in thefe Parts of America." Ibid. V, If ~T, ( Ixvi ) This, at leaft:, Is the opinion of every writer I have confulted, and of every perfon I have converfcd with, on the fubjtft. Still, however, it apears to me, that we .^-ave grounds for aflerting, that thcfc languages are not radically different, though it muft be confefled, that, in America, the rcfcm- blance between them is extremely fmall. It is, indeed, fo fmall, that were we not able to extend our inquiries on this fubjeft beyond the limits of America, we fhould continue the common affcr- tion, that it is not pcffible to difcover any refcm- blance between the language of the confederacy and that of the Lenni-Lennapc. I recoUedt but two inftances of refemblance between them. The fe deferve to be mentioned. The Onondagos, one of the Six-Nations, call a ftar Otjchijchtenocbqua. The Narraganfets call the fame Ancckquus : the Mahicanni, Anockfuk, and the Kikkapoos, Unaaqua. In thefe inftances, there is an evident refemblance between the two laft; fyllablcs (viz. nochqud) of the Onondago word, and the names of the Narraganfets, Mahicanni, and Kikkapoos. Thefe three laft, it is certain, fpeak dialefts of the Delaware language. I have already obferved, that the Pampticoughs fpake a dialeft of the Delaware language. Now it is CO be obferved, that they call the numeral fix, Wbo-yeocy and the Tufcaroras, who fpeak the *, * A, . riter I have converfcd t apears to , that thcfe though it the rcfcm- lal]. It is, ; to extend \c limits of imon aflcr- any refcm- :onfedcracy icoUeft but een them. lions, call a fets call the :kruk, and inccs, there le two laft dago word, Mahicanni, t is certain. Se- mpticoughs age. Now ie numeral i'peak the ( ^''vii ) language of the confederacy, call the fame num- ber Houeyoc. If the reader will examine, with attention, the vo- cabularies in this memoir he *m\\ difcover, in more inftances than one, the common origin of the lan- guages of the Six-Nations and thofc of the Lenni- Lennapc in Afia. Thus, there are undoubtedly ma- ny Delaware words in the language of the Lcfghis, who inhabit the mountains of Caucafus, and \n, that of the Toungoofi, whofe fpread in Afia is fo extenfive. In the language of thefe fame Afia-r tic nations, he will difcover unequivocal traces of the dialers of the confederates in America. If thefe pofitions be well founded, we are no longer authorized to afTcrt, that the language of the Six* Nations and that of the Delawares are radically different. None of the writers that I have confulted have difcovered any affinity between the language of the Cheerake and that of the Six-Nations. Char- levoix candidly confcffes that he could pot difco- ver "to what language the Cherokees belong*.'* I believe it has been univerfally fuppofcd, that their language is radically different from that of the con> federacy. But this, I am perfuaded, is not the cafr, The Mohawks call fire, Ocheeleh. The Chee- rake call the fame Cheera, Cheela, and Cheeiah, f Voli. p. 155. * ..* «#p w - t y H- i . » ! , <»■ I MfJF ' ll ( Ixviii ) The Onondagos call a dog, Tfchierba : the Chee- rakc, Keera^ and Keethlah : the Tufcaroras Cbeetb. Other inflanccs might be mentioned. The Senccas prcfcrvc a tradition, that they migrated from the vicinity of the Muflcohge- country. This circumftance favours my opinion, that the Six-Nations and the Cheerake are the fame people. It appear", from different parts of Adair's Hijiory of the American Indians y that there are fpme words common to the language of the Cheerake and Muflcohge. I find fome affinity between the language of the Muflcohge and that of the Onondagos. The for- mer call the ear lilehuchtfko : the latter Ob&cbta. Between the languages of the Muflcohge, Chik- kafah, and Choktah, there is an evident affinity. Thus the numerals three and ten [viz. Tootcbi'na and Pokdie'l are the fame in thefe languages. The former call the numeral four Obj^a : the two latter Qofia, Some words are common to the languages of the Cheerake, Chikkafah, and Choktah*. The dialedts of the Chikkafah and Choktah * In the language pf thefe three nations, iV^m fignifies a bill. '■■ ^ ■ ■ ■ ■•p^^^-^f^afWBf-if ■JMf »»■■"''»' "^^ W " '"'Vl the Chce- )ras Cbeeth. that they Vlulkohge- ly opinion, ike are the air's Htftory bme words erake and uageof the The for- ;r Ohuchta. ige, Chik- nt affinity. . Tootcihina ages. The : two latter ages of the Choktah nni fignifies a ( Ixix ) are very fimilar. This will appear from many parts of Adair's work. Their numerals arc prc- cifely the famcf. Interpreters are not ncccffary in. the intercourfc between thefe two tribes. Du Pratz fays, that the Conchacs fpake a lan- guage almoft the fame with that of the Chikka- fah. ''•^hcfe Conchacs dwelt in Weft-Florida, to the north of the Alibamous*, The fame author informs us, that the nation of the Mobilicns^ or Movill, fpcak the Chikkafah language^. The Mobiliens were fettled to the eaft of the Miffi- fippi, in the time of Soto. '^ I have not been able to procure any words in the language of the Katahba j nor can I fay with confidence to which of the American languages, the language of this nation is moft nearly allied. I have fome grounds for conjcfturing, that the Ka- tahba fpeak a dialeft of the Chikkafah or Chok- tah language. Adair fays, their language is a " mixed" one. J I am much at a lofs to know to which of the A- merican languages, the language of the Woe cons has the greatcft affinity. Lawfon informs us that there was but one word|| common to their lan- guage and that of the Tufcarorasj and yet thefc t Adair, p. 78. • Pages yrj, 308. § Page jog. J Page aa^. || The word TJamt, cockles. ( Ixx ) two nations lived not two leagues arunder§. There is fome affinity between the language of the Woccons and that of the J aioi in Guaianaf . It is greatly to be regretted, that we (hould be fo ignorant as we are of the language of the Natchez. I can fay nothing refpcfting it. Du Pratz fays thefe Indians fpeak " the Chicafaw language*." This, however, is denied by fome Indian interpreters, with whom I *have coiiverfed Oh the fubjeft. A circumftance mentioned by Adairf, convinces me, that the aflfcrtion of the French writer wants confirmation. I am not certain that I have difcovered any af- finity between the language of the Mexicans and that of any of the other American nations. It is to be remarked, however, that my collcftion of Mexican words is very fmall. It would, there- fore, be wrong to conclude that the language of thefe people is radically different from thofe of other Americans, Nevcrthelcfs, I think it may be faid, with fome degree of fafety, that if there are in America two or more radical lan- guages, the Mexican is one of them. The Poconchi or Pocoman language appears to have but little connection with any of the North- § A new Voyage, &c. p. 231. ^ The former call the head Popfti the latter Boppt, • Page 313. f Pageaie. ( Ixxi ) arunder§. inguage of jaiana^. (hould be gc of the ig it. Du Chicafaw d by fomc coiivcrfed itioned by tion of the 'cd any af- xicans and ons. It is )llc£tion of lid, thcre- anguage of m thofc of nk it may Yt that if adical Ian- appears to the North- 9oppt. zie. American dialcdls. The letters L and R arc both found in this language. It is faid to have *' fomc connexion" with the language called CbacciguelX. There is fomc affinity between the language of the Darien-Indians and that of the Pottawatameh, and other tribes of the Delaware (lock. In the language of the Poctawataweh, Nanna is mother. Naunah is the fame in the language of the Indians of the Ifthmus. There is likewifc fomc affinity between the Poconchi and Darien languages. In the former. Tat, and in the latter Tautah, is father. I have already faid, that there is fome affinity between the language of the Jaioi, in Guaiana, and that of the Woccons, in North-Carolina*. I have alfo obfcrved, that there is a confidcrable affinity between the language of the Caraibes and that of the Jaioif . We, moreover, difcover fome traces of rclemblanre between the languages of the Jaioi and Caraibes and that of the Natchez. Thefe laft call fire Qua: the Jaioi Ouapoto ; and the Carai'bes Ouatii/u. Having but fifteen or fixteen wordo in the lan- guages of the Arwaccas and the Shebaioi, two nations of Guaiana, I cannot pretend to fay any thing concerning them. I have, in another place, hinted at the refemblance which fubfifts between t Gage, p. 466. • See page 6g. f See pages 55, 56. I ■nnK>^«>iu '•«*t!%itP»j ( Ixxii ) the language of one of thefe nations and the dia* ledbs of certain Scmoyads, Toungoofi, &c. in A- fw*. Time has not effaced every refcmblance be- tween the language of certain Brafilians and that of fome of the tribes of North-America. In the language of fome of the Indians of Brafil, the eyes are called Scefcah. The Chippewas call the fame Skefick : theSawwannoo,Ske-fick-queh. The Pottawatameh call an eye Ne-ike-Ack. Of the language of the Ptruvians, I cannot form any certain judgment. ' The language of the Chilefe bears fome affinity to thofe of fome of the tribes of North- America. I have jufl faid that the Pottawatameh call the eye Ne-lke-fick. The Chilefe calls the eyes Ne. The latter call the mouth Oun. Certain Indians in Pennfylvania call the fame Toon, The preceding remarks, and the annexed vo- cabularies, do not favour the opinion of Mr. Jcf- ferfon, that the number of radical languages in America is fo greatf . It is true that hitherto we have difcovered but very little refcmblance be- * See page 22 of the Vocabulary, in the note, f See pages 19, 20. d the dia- Scc. in A.- stance be- ts and that a. In the Jrafil, the >ewas call fick-queh. e-Ack. innot form ne affinity -America. :all the eye eyes Ne. \m Indiana nexed vo- fMr. Jcf. nguages in ithcrto wc l>lancc bc- ote. ( Ixxiii ) Jp tween fcveral of thcfc languages. But then it Ihould be remembered, that our colledtions of words are very fmall and imperfcft, and of courfc, that as yet we have not had opportunities of point- ing out all the refcmblanccs which may exift. Much may be done by the labour of future inqui-»t rers. What the Abbe Clavigero has faid concerning the great number of languages in America is by no means conclufive. The languages of the Mexicans, Otomics, Tarafcas, Mayas, and Miz- tecas, were we in poflefllon of extenfivc vocabula- ries of them, would probably be found to bear fomc affinity to each other. Our author informs us, that in a journey " made by the Spaniards, in the year 1606, from New -Mexico unto the river which they call Tizon, fix hundred miles from that province, towards the north-weft, they found there fome large edifices and met with fome Indians who fpoke the Mexican language,"* &c. With regard to the thirty-five languages which have been difcovered in Mexico, and the fifty which the Portuguefe counted in Maragnon, in the beginning of the laft century, no perfon will imagine that they are all radically diflfcrcnt. Cla- vigero himfelf admits that there is a great affinity 1 * • Vol. 11, p. 4T4. ♦ • «. ^ l. , \4 ' ( Jxxiv ) . between fome of thofc languages, " which flicws, he remarks, that ihcy arc fprung from ihc fame parent, namely, the Eudtve, Opata, and Tanahu- , imra, in North- America, and the Mocohiy 'JUa, ♦ ^ and y^iipona, in South- America*." Even thofe which, he fays, are as different from each other as the Illyrian from the Hebrew, fuch as the lan- ♦ guages of the Mexicans, Otomies, Sccf it is pro- bable will be found to bear fome, perhaps a con- fiderablc, re fern blance to each other. The affini- ties of languages arc not to be difcovered by a fuperficial view of them. Extcnfive vocabularies fhould be collcded, and thefe fhonld be examin- ed and compared with labour and with patience. In fuch an inveftigation too, it is of elll-ntial con- fequence that the inquirer fhould proceed with candour, as well as with caution. Nothing is more common than for Indian tra- / ders, interpreters, or other perfons, to aflcrt, that fuch and fuch languages bear no relation to each other: becaufe, it feems, that the perfons fpealc- ■ ing them cannot always underftand one another. When thefe very languages, however, are com- pared, their relations, or affinities, are found out. It is by fuch comparifons, that I have afcertain- - ed, that the language of the Dtlawares is the lan- guage of fuch a great number of tribes in Amc- Vol. II. p. aeS. f Ibid. ^ i, * ich flicws, the fame i TanahU' obi, Toba, vcn thofc li other as • the Ian- it is pro- ps a con- 'he affini- cred by a :abularies examin- patiencc. itial con- eed with dian tra- rert, that 1 to each is fpeak- another. ire com- und out. fcertain- the Jan- in Amc- '' " ( Ixxv ) rica. It is by fuch comparifons, that future in- quirers may difcover, that in all the vaft countries of America there is but one language : fuch inqui- ries, perhaps, will even prove, or render it highly probable, that all the languages of the earti. bear ^ Ibmc affinity to each other. I have already difco- "' vcred fome ftriking affinities between the lan- guage of the Yolofs [one of the blacked nations of Africa] and certain American tribes. What a field for inveftigation docs this lafl: mentioned cir- cumftance open ! Whilft philofophers are bufied ' in inveftigating the influence of climate and food, and other phyfical agents, in varying the figure and complexion of mankind, they fhould not negleft inquiries into the rcfcmblances of all languages. The farther we pufh our refearches of thil kind, the more we difcover the proofs, if not of the ab- folutc derivation of all mankind from one pair, at leaft of the ancient intercourfc of all the nations of the earth. I now proceed to give fome account of the dif- ferent Afiatic and European nations whofe lan- guages arc compared with thofe of the Ameri- cans*. • The reader will pleafe to obfcrve that in the following vocabularies tlie American are feparated from tjie Afiatic an4 other languages by a line thus : t ♦ % : M r,J.vS^;''*,£^i..:-: ..^-; ■» I%* •'% '?■ ( Ixxvi ) The Semoyads feem moft entitled to our firft attention, as their range in Afia is fo great, and as their language fecms to be fo unequivocally pre- ferred in an immenfe portion of America. The original Semoyads, Samojedes, or Samo- eds, commonly called by the Ruffians, Samoyedi, « inhabit the northernmoft part of Ruffia along the coafts of the Icy-Sea, from the river Petchora as far as the Lena, and are divided into the Euro- pean and Siberian Semoyadsf." Ml the Semoy- ads lead a wandering life. The Semoyads, 120, dwell in the vicinity of Petchora, near the Frozen-Sea: thofe 121, dwell in the vicinity of the town of Obdorflc, near the fame fea: 122, in Joraczkago : 123, in Man- gafea: 1 24 in Toorooganlko : 125', 126, on the river Tomfk, in Siberia: 127, near Narim on the Obe in Siberia : 128, on the river Kett ; and, 129, in the diftrift of Timlkago. The numbers affixed to the Afiatic nations are the numbers by which thefe nations are marked in the Vocabularia Compara- ' ti-va of Pallas. In a few inftances, I have riot exhibited any comparifon of the American with the Afiatic or other words. In thefe cafes, the line is not made ufe of. f The words in inverted commas are taken from a very ufe- ful work, entitled Survey cf the Ruftan Empire, Sec. p. 64. By Capt. Sergey Plefcheef. Englifti Tranflation. London : 1792. 8vo. I ihall frequently refer to uiis work in the fol- lowing pages. 'iftfe-^ our firft great, and 'ocallypre- ica. , or Samo- Samoyedi, LulTia along er Petchora o the Euro- the Semoy- 5 vicinity of thofe 121, idorflc, near 23, in Man- ia6, on the r Narim on ■ Kctt ; and, are the numbert hularia Compara- Bt exhibited any or other words. from a very ufe- tpire, &c. p. 64. ition. London : work in the fol- ( Ixxvii ) The Karafllni, 130, inhabit the kingdom of Carezem, not far from the Gihon, called Oxus by the ancients. Taweeguini, 131. Kamaftfhini, 132, dwell on the river Kama, a branch of the Volga. TheKoiballi, or Kaybalhi, 133, and the Mou- tori, 134, are of the fame race with the Semoy- ads. They are difpcrfed in different parts of Si- beria, as on the rivers Obe, Eniffcy*, Kett, Tom, die. The Mogul-Tartars, 135, arc alfo called IVlun- gals. They are principally difpcrfed in the dcferts ofGobey, and partly in the diftri6t of Selcnghinflct» The Mungals do not confider themfelves as Tartars^, The Boureti, 136, called by the Ruffians, Brats- kic, " live on the banks of the Baical, and other places in the government of Irkoutlk : they differ from the Toungoofi only by their lan- guage, which is compounded of the Mungalian : they fubfift by the breeding of cattle and hunting, and are all idolaters, governed by Shamans§." Bell, who calls them Buraty, fays their faces • Jcnifea, Jenifei, Jewca. J Strahlenberg, p. 5 1 • f Plefcheef, p. 65. § Plefcheef, p. 67. ■^' *^f4 P * -w K^f,.,^.viii?:^-.-^lu;i- »■» 4 t ( Ixxviii ) i " are not quite fo flat as thofe of the Kalmucks ; their nofes being fomewhat higher, and their countenances more open*." The Kalmuks, 137, or as they are called by the Ruffians, Kalmhyki and Kalmyki, "fpcak the Mungalian language, obferve the religion of La- ma, get their livelihood chiefly by the breeding j; of cattle, and live in large kibitki, a kind of tents. Some of them have carried their habitations in- to the circuit of Stavropol in the government of Siberia, and are Chriflriansf." The Toungoofi, Tungufi, or Tongufians, arc a very numerous people. In the time of Strahlen- bcrg, they were thought to amount to feventy or eighty thoufand men J. " They are difpcrftd ' from the river EniflTcy as far as the fea of Okhotflc, and from the Penjinflcaya Gooba, beyond the Chinefe frontier : they live by hunting and fifli- ing ; their tongue is a dialed of the Manjour. They are all idolaters, under the government of Shamans ||." Some writers are of opinion, that feme of the Toungooli came originally from Dauria§. On the authority of the Chinefe Annals, and other • Vol. I. p. 299, 300. t Plefcheef. p. 66. X Page 450. II PJefcheef, p. 67. ^ Iftrand Ides and Adam Brandt, as quoted by Strahlenberg, p, 451. «,>■**# U, ,. f I .. . -ik .^^JkaL^^.^ 1? almucks ; ind their called by fpcak the 3n of La- breeding of tents, itions in- iment of lans, are Jtrahlen- venty or iifpcrftd )khot(k, ond the md fifh- 4anjour. iment of c of the §. On d other 66. L Ides and ( Ixxix ) works, it is aflcrtcd that the anceftors of the Ton- gooii were the firft original Tartars *. They call themfelves Kalljak-Tzin, That is, "generations who have taken their fixed abode in certain places. The Toungoofi, 138, dwell near the town of NeremfK: thofe 139 on the Jenifea : ,40, in the Province of Mangafea: ,41, in Bargoozin : 142, m Upper Angerfkich : ,43. near Yakutlka : i44> near Ochotlka. The Lamuti, 145, the Chapoglrri, ,46, and the Yukaghiri, 147, dwell on the river Enifley. * , J^ll ^''l: '^'' '^" ^°"°^'' '49> the Aff.nl ^ 150, the Inbac, Z51, and the Pumpocolli, ,5., all inhabit ,n the vicmity of the Eniffey. They are now vay few in numberf. part of Kamtchatka, « in the vicinity of the Pen- Jinfkaya Gooba, and on the coaft of the Eaftcrn Ocean almoft as far as the Anadir. They are divided into the fedentary or fixed, and the wan- dering or the rein-deer Koriaki : the former fub- fift by hunting and fifhing, and the latter by rear- - «ng reindeer. Their mode of living, their man- ners, and cuftoms are very fimilar to thofe of the Kamtchadalst" Strahlenberg fays they ar^ •StrahJeaber^.p.,5,. t Palla.. t Plefche'cf. p. 6^ J_-J *''.,■ I ( Ixxx ) bcardlcfs like the Laplanders, Semoyads, andOf- tiaks: " For, in the firft Place, they have natu- rally very little hair about their mouth, and what little they have they pluck out, as do alfo the J«- kuhti, TungusU and Kalmucks*." It is hardly ne- ceffary to obferve, in this place, that the Amen- can Indians very generally pull out their beards, as well as the hair from other parts of their bodies. The'Koriaki 153. dwell in the government of Irkoutflc: 154, on the river Kolhima; and 155, on the river Tigyl. * Under this head of Koriaki, I may mention the ' * inhabitants of the iHand of Caraga, 156, which is ^ ntuated near the north-eaft coaft of Kamtchatka. Pallas fays, they fpeak the Koriaki language. The Tchouktchi, or Tchuktfchi, 157, inhabit «' the north-eaftern part of Siberia, between the ri- vers Kolhima and Anadir, and are diftinguilhcd by the names of Fixed and Rein-deer Tchuktchi : they are very rude and lavage, and inclined to fu- icide By refemblance they feem to be of the fame race with the Koriakif." I may here ob- ferve, that fuicide is the vice of our American In- dians. Is not fuicide more common among la- vage than among civilized nations ? I fliall exa- mine this queftion in another place. Pallas fays ' Strahlenberg, p. 39^- t Plefchtef, p. 7''7Z- x_.. ( Ixxxi ) s, andOf- lavc natu-- , and what fo the Ja- hardly ne- ,he Ameri- cir beards, heir bodies. ernment of 1} and 155, mention the 56, which is Lamtchatka. nguage. 157, inhabit tween the ri- inguilhcd by Tchuktchi : iclined to fu- to be of the nay here ob- American In- on among fa- ? Ifliallexa- . Pallas fays leef. p.y-zz- the language of the Tchouktfchi is nearly a dialcdl of the Koriak. The Kamtchadals are the people of Kamtchat- ka, or Jecco as ir is called by the Chinefe. They are now under the fubjeftion of the Ruffians, and have embraced the Chriftian religion. " They get their livelihood chiefly by huntir; and fifliing. In winter they live in fubterraneous yurts, or huts, and in the fummer in balagans, a kind of building raifed on pillars in the manner of a pigeon- houfe*." The Kamtchadals 158, live in the northern parts of the Peninfula, along the river Tigyl: 159, in the weftern part along the river Bol/haya: i6o, on the river Kamtchatka, towards the North-Cape. The Japonians, or Japoneefe, 161, are the people of Japan. The Kouriltzi, 162, inhabit the fouthern part of Kamtchatka, and the Kourifkie, or Kurile- Iflands, which are fituated between Kamtchatka and Japan, The Mandfhuri, or Manjouri, 163 j the Kitta- wini, 164; and the Tangutani, 165, inhabit the country, called Chincfe-Tartary. m * Plefchee'f, p. 68. fm % I ( IxxxH ) The Indoftani, i68, arc the natives of Bengal j thofe 169, are the natives of Deccan. The Malays, 183, and the Javancfe, 184, arc well known by thefc names. The Lefghis, Lefghintzi, or Lefguintfi, dwell on and near Mount Caucafus. They " are divi- ded into twcnty-feven tribes*.*' They are faid to be a reftlefs and faithlefs people, " making fre- quent incurfions into Georgia and other neigh- bouring countriesf." The Lefghis, 50, dwell on the Antzoogk : 51, on the Jawr ; 52, on the Choonzawgk j and 53, on the Deedo. TheTchiochonflci, 54 ; the Eftlandians, 55; the Carelians, 56 j the Olonetzi, 57; and the Lopari, 58, inhabit the country on both fides of the Gulph of Finland. All' thefe have a Finnic origin. The Zhiryane, 59, " are found in the govern- ment of Pcrme, and, like the Permiaki, can hard- ly be diftinguifhed from the Ruffians : fome of them have gone over to the river ObeJ." They are defcended from the Tchude, or Finns ||. The Permiaki, or Pcrmians, 60, dwell in the • Plefcheef, p. 63. I Plefcheef, p. 53. I Ibid, p. 332. |{ Ibid. p. 133. .^.^A— --——.■■— ■• ^'»*-' » ^' U ti ':l iiiJ^''X-^— •■ ( Ixxxiii ) f Bengal} 184, are itfi, dwell ■ are divi- Y are faid aking fre- ler neigh- jogk: 51, i and 53, IS, 55; the lie Lopari, the Gulph rigin. e govcrn- can hard- : fome of :." They ns||. well in the 332- I. p. 133. government of Perme, and about the northern parts of the river Obe.* The Mordva, or Morduini, 61, are divided into two tribesj viz. the Mokfhan and the Erzian. They inhabit the government of Nizncy-Novgn- rod, Kazane, Sinbirfk, Oufa, and Penza. Moil of them are Chriftiansf . Like the Tchuvalhi, they make the doors of their houfes to the fouth, " that they may offer their prayers to the Sun." They facrifice an ox to their god, whom they name JumiJhipasX. The Mokfhan 62, I have jufl mentioned as a branch of the Mordv t. The CheremifTi, 63, more properly Tchere- miffi, inhabit the governments of Kafane, Nizney- Novgorod, and Orenburg. Some of them are Chriftians, others Idolaters §. Thele people have defcended from the Finns. Their language has a great affinity with that of the Finns,but it is much mixed with that of the Ruffians and Tartars ||. The Tchuvafhi, 64, called alfoCzuwafchi,are in every refpeft like the Tcheremiffi, and live in the * I beg leave to mention, in this place, that the Permiaki call the cye,Schin (Strahlenberg). The Chikkafah-Indians call the eyes Skin. The Sankikani call the eye Schinquoy. See the Vocabularies, No. xvii. f Plefcheef, p. 51;. J Strahlenberg, p. 412, 413. \ Plefcheef, p. 54. || Strahlenberg, p. 355. ^-r^r-*"""— ^-w ( Ixxxiv ) fame places with the Mordva : they arc almoft all Chriftians*. " They offer all their firft fruits tp their god, whom they call Thory and fet before him " a certain loaf-)-." The Votiaki, or Votti, 65, inhabit the govern- ments of Kazane, and Viatka, and other neigh- bouring diftrifts. " They employ themfelves in hufbandry and breeding of cattle. Some of them are Chriftians, but the grcateft part are Idolaters, and governed by their Shamanslf ." *' The Vogoulitchi dwell in the northern part of the Oural Mountains. Part of them lead a wandering life, and fomc are fettled. They fub- • Plefcheef, p. 54. 55. t Strahlenberg, p. 355, 356. X Plefcheef, p. 53, 54. — The Shamans are vizards or con- jurers, who are in high eftimation among many of the idola- trous nations of Ruflia. They pretend, (and unfortunately it is believed by the miferable people among whom they refide) that they can cure difeafes, avert misfortunes, and foretel things yet locked up in the womb of time. They pretend to do much more. I cannot help obferving, in this place, that the conjurers among the American favages, are the Shamans of this country. Their very exiftenct, in both portions of the world, is a Ariking proof of the miferable and debafed condition of extenfive families of mankind. It tells us, howe- ver, what was once probably, the conditions of thofe very na- tions whom fcience and freedom now enlighten. // tells us what may again be our lot, Ihould we relapfe into times of ftupidity and error. But even the wifeft of nations arc ftill fon>cwhat under the government of Shamans. I » yt?: I ' almoH: all ft fruits to fet before e govern- icr neigh- mfelves in jc of them : Idolaters, thern part em lead a They fub- ; 355. 356. izards or con- of the idola- ifortunately it ■ n they refide) I, and foretel ;y pretend to is place, that ! the Shamans i portions of e and debafed ells us, howe- :hofe very na- n. // tells us into times of tions are flill ( Ixxxv ) fift chiefly by hunting and fifliing. Some of them are Chridians i the reft are Idolaters*." Strah- Icnbcrg fays that thefc people are defcended from the Hunsf. When the Vogoulitchi have killed fevcral bears in the woods, they offer three of them to their gods J. The Vogoulitchi 66, dwell in the government of Tobollk in Siberia : 68, near Chcndeema, and 69, near Berezov, both in the government of Tobolfk. The Oftiaks 70, dwell about Berczowa: 71, near Narim : 72, on the loganni : 73, in the dif- trift of Loompokonlk : 74, in the diftridt of Waflioguanlkawgo : 75, on the river Taz. The Perfians, 76, are well known by this name. The Curdi, 77, are the people of Curdiftan, or Gurdiftan. TheOfetti, Oflctintzi, or Ofll, 79, are fupptfed to be the ancient Uzi. They live in the middle part of the Caucafian-Mountains. The Dugorri, 80. The Turks, 88, are well known by this name. * Plefcheef, p. 55. f Page 97. j Strahlcnberg, p. 96, 97. ""W ( Ixxxvi ) The Tartars, 89, dwell in the province of Ka- zane : 90, 91, in the government of Orenburgh, in Siberia: 92, 93, on Mount- Caucafus : 94, near the town of Tobolflc : 95, in the diftrift of Tchatlkago : 96, in the diftrift of Checollimic : 97, on the Jenifca : 98, near Kooznctfkaw -, and 99, on the Baraba. The Kangatfi, 100, live in Independent Tarta- ry, in Afia. The Tcleouti,or White-Kalmuks, 101, live in villages about Kuznetfl<. The Bucharians, or Bafhkirtzi, 10a, dwell in thefouthern part of the Uralian-Mountains. The Kirghiftzi, or Kirghis-kaifaks, 104, be- tween the rivers Oural and Emba. The Yakouti, 106, dwell near the rivers Lena, Yana, &c. in Siberia. " Their outward appear- ance, language, cuftomsand fafhions, (hew that this race dcfcends from a mixture of Tartars and Mungals*." The Kartalini, 108, dwell on Caucafus. The Imeretians, 109, people oflmeretia. The Suanetti, iioj the Kabardinian Tcher- kelTi, iiii the Altckefick-Abiflinian, ii2ithe • Plefcheef, p. 60. iceof Ka- rcnburgh, afus : 94i diftria of ecoUimie : [kaw ', and ent Tarta- oi> live in ,, dwell in tains. , 104, bc- Ivers Lena, ird appcar- ew that this artars and fus. retia. ian Tcher- , 1 1 2 i the ( Ixxxvii ) * the'Kufhazlbb-Abiflinlan, 113; the Tchcchcntzi, 1 14 ; the Inguflicvtzi, 115; the Toofchctti, 1 16 ; the Kazec-Koomitlki, 117, and the Akafhini, 119, dl dwell on and near Caucafus. In my vocabularies, I have alfo given a place to the Chincfej tothe VindjE, or Vandals, who inha- bit the countries of Lufatia and Carniola ; to the native IriHi ; to the Wallachians, or people of Walachia, Moldavia, and the frontiers of Tran- fylvania ; and to the Anglo-Saxons. I have alfo mentioned the Eikimaux, who there is every rea- fon to believe are derived from Afla, as well as the other Americans*. * The foregoing notices concerning the Afiat'ic and Europe'^ an nations will, doubtlefs, be thought too brief: but neither time nor inclination would permit to enter farther on the fub- jedl at prefent. As we are now in poflefTion of excellent maps of the countries inhabited by the nations whom I have menti- oned, the reader will not find it a difficult matter to difcover, with care, the prccife places of their refidence. The beau- tiful mJips prefixed to Pennants' Ar^ic Zoology are worth confulting. I would alfo refer him to the map prefixed to Plefciicef's Survey; and to that in Strahlenberg's work, entitled an Hijiorico-Geographical Defiription of the North and Eajlern Parts of Europe and Afta, Sec. Englifli tranflation. London: 1738. 4to. This is the work which I have often alluded to in the courfe of this inveftigution. '?;< 'f" '- .. -r •i ( Ixxxviii ) THE comparative vocabularies which arc pub- liftied in this memoir, fcem to render it certain, that the nations of America and thofc of Afia have a common origin. I flatter myfclf that this point is now cftablilhed with fome degree of certainty, though I by no means fuppofc that what I have faid Ihould preclude the neccflity of farther inqui- ries on the fubjcft. On the contrary, I am per- fuaded that I have only opened a mine, in which future labourers will difcover great and many riches. But it may be faid, the origin of the Americans is not yet afcertaincd. My vocabularies only prove " that the Americans and many Afiatic and European nations are the fame people." They tell " us not which was the parent ftock." I have alrea- dy admitted thefe two pofitions, in a former part of this difcourfe*, and I am willing to admit them through the whole of this difcufllon. I have entered upon the fubjeft of this memoir uninfluenced by theoretical authorities of any kind. I was of opinion that he who undertakes the invef- tigation of any important queftion, whether it re- lates to phyfics or to morals, Ihould endeavour, as • See page 15. *i * 3 tfo > . -J ««<-«( 1 fe,-.,«M^.ai*.fc :h arc pub- it certain, f Afia have : this point ■ certainty, hat I have cher inqui- , I am per- , in which and many Americans laries only Afiatic and ' They tell have alrea- formcr part admit them his memoir of any kind. s the invcf- lether it rc- ideavQur, as ( Ixxxix ) much as pofTiblf , to diveft his mind ofcvery fpc- cies of prejudice : and what arc many authorities as wc call thtfii, but prejudices of the ftrongcft kind ? Thus influenced by an opinion of the nc- cefljty of a free and unbialTed inveftigation of the fubjcft, I concede, for the prefent, that it may be doubtful, whether the Afiatic and European na- tions, whofc languages I have compared with thofe of the Americans, gave origin to the latter, or whether the latter arc not rather the original ftock of the former. It was the opinion of Mr. Jcfferfon, that the nations of America are " of greater antiquity than thofe of Afia." Our illuftrious countryman was induced to adopt this opinion, from having, as he fnppofed, difcovered that there is a much greater number of radical languages in America than in Afia. If the pofition were eilablifhed, the infer- ence might, perhaps, be maintained. But I think I have fhown, that wc are not in pofleflion of fads to prove that there are in America many radical languages, whatever may be done, at fome future period, by a more complete inveftigation of the fubjeft. On the contrary, my inquiries fcem to render it probable, that all the languages of the countries of America may, in America, be traced to one or two great (locks. In Afia, I think, they may confidently be traced to one. For the lan- guage of the Mexicans, which is fo difi^ereat from n ) W:- ( xc ) • that of the other Americans, has fome affinity to the languages of the Lefghis and the Perfians : and I have already obfervcd, that the languages of thefe two Afiatic nations arc prefcrved among many American tribes*. I believe it is a fa(^, that in America there is frequently lefs affinity between languages which I confidcr as being radically the fame, than there is in Afia betweeri languages which are alfo taken to be radically the fame. This, however, does not, in my opinion, prove that the Americans are of greater antiquity than the Afiatics. It would fcem to prove no more than this, viz. that the Ameri- cans alluded to have been longer fcparated from each other in America, than the Afiatics of whom I fpeak have been fcparated from each other in Afia. Since, then, the affinity which fubfifts between the languages of the Americans, and thofe of the Afiatics and Europeans does not, in my opinion, incontelUbly prove, that the former are the de- fcendants of the latter, but only that they are one and the fame people, it is proper that I fhould fuow the real origin of the Americans by attend- ing to other circumftances befides that of lan- guage. This I Ihall endeavour to do, principally by examining, in a few words, two intercfting features in the hiftory of America. • See pages 14, 67. mgtmAMjjMfM^mn^u ( xci ) tie affinity : Perfians : languages '^ed among ca there is ;es which I an there is fo taken to , does not, :ans are of irould fcem he Amcri- rated from s of whom :h other in ts between iofe of the ly opinion, ire the de- ey are one : I Ihould by attend- at of lan- principally tntereiling Firft. I have already remarked, that were it not for the traditions of many American nations we might for ever remain in doubt concerning the real origin of thefc people*. The traditions of the tribes and nations of America are, indeed, entitled to much attention in an inquiry into their origin, . For notwithftanding the rude condition of moft of thefe tribes, their traditions are often prcfcrvcd for a long time in confiderable purity, as I have difcovered by much attention to their hiftory. Befides, it is certainly an eafy matter for nations, however ignorant of arts, to preferve, through a feries of feveral.generations, the great features of their hiftory. Thus what circumftances fhould prevent the poftcrity of the prcfentChikkafah from knowing that the nation originally crofled the Miflifippi ? Or is it likely that the poftcrity of the Sawwannoo will ever forget that they once inha- bited the banks of the Savanna-River ? If all, or many, of the North-American tribe* had preferved a tradition, that their anceftors for- merly dwelt towards the rifing of the fun, and that . in procefs of time, impelled by the fpirjtof con- tjueft, by urgent neceiTities, by caprice, or by the influence of a dream, they had moved towards the fetting of the fame planet, would not fuch a tra- dition be thought entitled to fome attention in an • See page 15. » ( xcii ) \' ■■.:J;,.,^ yl^ inquiry concerning the original of thefe people ? Would notfuch a tradition rather favour the opini- ons of thofe writers who have imagined, that the Norwegians, the Welfh, and other nations of Eu- rope, have been the principal peoplers of Ameri- ca ? But the nations of America have not prefcr- ved any fuch tradition as this. On the contra- ry, their traditions inform us that they came from the weft J that they crofled the Miflifippi, and that they gradually travelled towards the eaft. " When you a(k them," fays Lawfon, fpeakingof the Carolina- Indians, " whence their Fore-fathers came, that firft inhabited the country, they will point to the Weftward and fay, ff^here the Sun fleepSy our Fore-fathers came thence-\" &c. As far as my inquiries have extended, all the Indian nations on this fide of the Miflifippi aflcrc, that they paflfed from the weft, from the north- weft, or from the fouth. Many of them fpcak of their paflage acrofs the Miflifippi. The Natchez informed Du Pratz, that before they came into the country eaft of the MiflTifippi, they dwelt near- ly in the fonth-weft, " under the fun4" The Mulkohge, or Creeks, aflcrt that they crofled the Miflifippi about the time that the army of Soto rambled through Florida. || The Chikkafah have told me, that they formerly lived to the weft of the ■f A New Voyage, &c. p. 170. % The Hiftory of Louifiana, &c. p. 292. || Sec page 47. ( xciii ) 'e people ? the opini- i, that the 3ns of Eu- of Ameri- lot prefcr- ic contra- came from ilippi, and i the call, fpeakingof ore-fathers , they will re the Sun :c. led, all the fippi aflcrt, the north- m fpeak of he Natchez r came into dwelt near- n4" The croffed the ny of Soto :kafah have ! weft of the Sec rage 47. MilTifippi, and that they relinquifhed that country in obedience to a dream, in which they were advifcd to leave their weftern eftabJifliment, and to go to the country where the fun rifes. I have been aflTured, that the Six-Nations aflcrt that they travelled from the weft, or fouth-weft. The Mahicanni have told me, that they came from the weft beyond the Great-River, or Miflifippi. Ro- ger Williams informs us, that the fouth-weft, or Sawwaniu, is the great fubjeft of rhe difcourfc of the Indians of New-England. " From thence, fays our author, their traditions. There they fay, at the fouth-weft, is the court of their great God Cawtantowwit. At the fouth-weft are their fore-fathers' fouls. To the fouth-weft they go themfclves, when they die. From the fouth-weft came their corn and beans, out of the great God Cawtantowwit's field *." The aflual march of many of the American tribes ftrongly fupports their traditions. Wc have traced the Sawwannoo from the fouthf, and it is known that the Tufcaroras came from the fouth when they joined the confederacy of the Five-Na- tions. A few years ago, th-re were ftill living fome old Indians who recollcftcd when a part of the Chikkafah nation firft arrived in the neigh- bourhood of St. Auguftine, from the wciTcrn fide • A Key into the Langqage of America, &c. f See pages 32, 33, 60. ( xciv ) of the Miflifippi. I do not think it neccflary to mention other inftances. The peregrination of the Toltecas, the Mexi- cans, and other nations, ftrongly fupport the no- tion of their Afiatic origin. If we can depend up- on the teftimony of the unfortunate Boturini, the firft of thefc nations even prelerved in their Di- vine Book a reprefentation of '* their journey in Afia, their firft fettlements upon the Continent of America, tiic founding of the kingdom of Tula, and their progrefs till that time.*" It is to be re- gretted that our information concerning the Tol- tecas is fo much involved in obfcurity, and per- haps in fable. The migration of the Mexicans has much more the appearance of truth. It is faid, that until about the year 1160 of our asra, they inhabited a country, called Aztlan, which was fituated far to the north of the gulph of Cali- fornia. In their progrefs to the fouth, they crolT- ed the Rio-Colorado, or Red-River, which emp- ties itfelf into the top of the gulph, and afterwards croffed the Gila, a branch of the Colorado, where remains of a vaft edifice which they conftrufted are ftill to be fcenf. The remaining part of their rout I do not think it neceflary to purfue, as my • Clavlgero's Hiftory of Mexico^ vol. I. p. 87, f Ibid. p. 112, 113, ii4» ^^' ( xcv ) leccflary to only objcft, *at prefcnt, is to fliow that they mi- grated from the northward. , the Mexi- ort the no- depend up- loturini, the in their Di- r journey in Continent of im of Tula, is to be rc- Dg the Tol- ty, and per- le Mexicans truth. It is of our asra, :tlan, which jlph of Cali- , they crolT- which emp- id afterwards )rado, where conftrufted part of their irfue, as my 87. Secondly. When the Europeans took poffefli- on of the countries of North- America, • they found the weftern parts of the continent much more thickly fettled than the eaftern. This af- fcrtion is confirmed by the tcftimony of all the earlier vifitors of America ; and it is a fa& which, in my opinion, gives confiderable weight to the theory, that the Americans are of Afiatic origin. I (hall not attempt to conceal, that this greater degree of population of the weftern parts of America was ufcd as an argument to prove the derivation of the Americans from Afia, almoft two hundred years agof . Many monuments, which have efcaped the ra- vages of time, and will probably, for ages yet to come, folicit the attention of the antiquary and philofopher, are fo many proofs of the higher de- gree of population of the weftern over the eaftern parts of North- America. The monuments which I allude to are the large earthen fortifications or walls, the mounds, and other fimilar works, which have been difcovered in America. Thefe are to be feen in every part of the continent. But I believe, it is a faft, that they are much lefs nu- I See Brerewood's Enquiries, &c. p. 117. See alfo Gage's New Survey of the Wcft-Indies. p. 162. ^i €:.. lupMdli Ui ( xcvi ) mcrous in the countries which ftretth along the Atlantic-Ocean, and from thence to the great ranges of our mountains, than they are in the countries which are comprehended between thofc mountains and the Miffifippi. There arc good reafons for fuppofing, that thefq monuments are ftill more numerous in the vaft countries weft of ,the Miffifippi t- I NOW proceed to inquire, whether the tribes and nations of South -America have fprung from the fame parental ftocks as thofe of North-Ame- rica. But this queftion, though interefting, Ihall n ot detain me long. It does not appear to me to be a queftion difficult of folution. My opinion con- cerning it might, in fome meafure, be gathered from what I have already faid in a former part of this inquiry. It was fuppofcd by Poftel, that all the coun- tries of North-America were peopled by the Ac- lantides, inhabitants of Mauritania. This writer is faid to have been the firft " who made fuch a difference between the two Americas, by means of the Ifthmus of Panama ; that according to him, *nd thofc who have adopted his Opinions, the Inhabitants of thofe two Continents have nothing t See Papers relative to certain American Antiquities. By Winthrop Sargent, Efq. and by Benjamin Smith Barton, p. 9. [\ along the 3 the great are in the :twcen thofe re arc good kuments are ij-ics weft of )er the tribes fprung from t^orth-Ame- refting, fliall icar to me to opinion con- athered from part of this 11 the coun- d by the At- This writer made fuch a by means of ling to him, )pinions, the have nothing Antiquities. By ith Barton, p. 9. ( xcvii ) ^ ^' common in their Origin*." I have not fccn what Poftel has written on the fubjcft -, nor can I rea- dily conceive by whAt arguments he has defended an hypothcfis, fo extraordinary, and fo eafily dif- p oved. But even in our own times, an opinion iomewhat fimilar to that of Poftel has been main- tained by a writer of much learning, and of exten- five rcfcarch. " We conjefture," fays the Abbe Clavigero, the author I allude to, ** that the an- ceftors of the nations which peopled South-Ame- rica went there by the way in which the animals proper to hot countries pafied, and that the an- ceftors of thofe nations inhabiting all the coun- tries which lie between Florida and the mod northern part of America, paffcd there from the north of Europef.** If my comparative view of the languages of America with thofe of Afia and of Europe, is of any importance in afcertaining the parental coun- tries of the Americans, it muft then be admitted, that it is unfavorable to the notion, that the peo- ple of the countries of the northern and the fouth- crn continents of the new-world have a different origin. I have already pointed out the refem- blances which lubfift between the languages of feveral nations in North and feveral nations in • See Charlevoix's Preliminary Difcourfe, p. 3. f The Hiftory of Mexico, vol. II. p. 215. rm. "TV ^' ( xcviii ) ."s South-America*. Other rrfcmblanccs will be difcovcrcd by an infpeftion of the vocabularies. Thus we trace the language of the Jaioi of Guai- ana to that of the Koriaki, and other northern Afi- atics. We trace the language of the Shebaioi, another nation of Guaiana, to the languages of the Taweeguini, the Semoyads, the Toungoofi, the Yokagirri, the Kottowi, the Aflani, fecf. The language of the Caraibes, who may be called South-Americans, has a remarkable affinity with that of feveral nations in the north of Afia|. We difcover an evident affinity betwrtn the lan- guage of certain Brafilians and that of the Kulha- zibb on Mount- Caucafus, the Vogoulitchi, and the language of the Inbaci, who dwell in the vicinity of the Eniffeyll. Even in the imperfeft vocabu- lary of the Peruvians, I difcover the language of • See pages 71, 72. f See page 22 of the vocabulary, in the note. X The Caraibes call father, Baba : the Tartars on the Jenifea call it the fame. There is even fome refemblance be- tween the language of the Caraibes and that of tH^ Ci^remiifi. The former call the fun, Kachi ; the latter Kitfehe. The for- mer call a ftone, T}bou : the Lefghis, 50, call the fame, 7'eb. There is moreover fome affinity between the language of the Caraibes and that of the Eflcimaux, who are undoubtedly Afia- tict. The former call the earth, Nonum : the latter. Nana. II The Brafilians call fire, Tata. The Vogoulitchi, 67, call the fame Tat. The former call the eye's, Defa, and Dtfa. The Inbaci Dies. . , ' • .m.^^yMsimr s will be :abularies. i of Guai- thern Afi- Shebaioi, iguages of ngoofi, the xf. The be caMed Ifinity with of Afia^l:. tn the Ian- ihe Kufha- :hi> and the he vicinity ft vocabu- language of 'artars on the ifemblance be- tift C.;^remiiri. cte. the for- che Tame, 7'ei. inguage of the [oubtedly Afia- ; latter. Nana. litchi, 67, call fa, and D^/a. ( xcix ) fome of the Caucafian tribes*. The language of the Chilcfe, who inhabit the utmoft limits of my refcarches in South-America, may alfo be traced to that of the Tcherkcfli, the Zhiryanc, the Vogou- litchif, &c. I do not mean, by thefe obfcrvations, to aflert, that South-America has not received any of its inhabitants from the parallel parts of Afia or Africa. Accidents, with which we arc not ac- quainted, may have thrown both fouthern Afia- tics and Africans upon the coafts of America. But hypothefis Ihould be avoided as much as pof- fible in an inquiry fuch as this } and fimplicity in the inveftigation fhould be aimed at. From a comparifon of the languages of the South- Ame- ricans with thofe of the Afiatics, I cannot doubt that the former, as much as the Northr Americans, are the defendants of the latter. If we difcover fome refemblance between the languages of South- America and that of the Malays, &c. the fame may be faid of the languages of the North- Ame- ricans and the Malays. The only inference 1 • In the language of the Peravians, the earth it called la/la. It is Latta in the language of the Chcchengi, and Laite a.ni Lattt in that of the Ingoofhevi, or Inguflievtzi,| whQ both live in the middle of the mountains of Caucafus. t The Chilefe call the 3ye$, Ne : the Tcherkeffi, AV. The former call the cars, Piium: the Zhiryane, the Permiajc)> &c. Pei: the Vogoulitchi, P*l, Paih fcc. ^ . mfiim^'mmmm 4 ( ) think proper to deduce from fuch refcmblanccs is this, that the languages of the Americans in both continents, and the Malays, &c. retain feme fragments of the language which they have both borrowed from the more northern Afi ticsf. As to Clavigcro's notion that there was '• an ancient union between the equinoftial countries of America and thofe of Africa, and a conti- nuation of the northern countries of America with thofe of Europe or Aft:- ■ the latter for the pafTage of beafts of cold climes, the former for the paf- fage of quadrupeds and reptiles peculiar to hot climes* :" it is not, in this inquiry, entitled to much attention. Neverthclefs, I beg leave to make a few obfervations on the fubje£t. It never will be denied by philofophers, that many par:s of the world which are now widely feparated, were once much more contiguous, and even united. Thus Sicily was united to the con- tinent of Naples, and Spain is faid to have been united to Africa. There is good reafon to believe, that the continents of Afia and North-America were once united, not merely at the ftreights of Anian or Behring, but even as low as about the latitude of 52, and perhaps (till farther fouth. The chain of iflands which modern navigators t See the note p. 33. 34> 3S» 3^ o*'*'>« Vocabalarjr. • Vol. II. p. 2»p, V i^'**- fi i., r.i rr ! ■> ■ * f *i ■ii jiiiw ^ i v iii { ii | « ! ii >;»! .•jfirMt'"-i'i' "-••; ""■^-'fc"'**'';""""'*''"'* * ^'" V cmblances ericans in ctain fomc have both ticsf. : was " an 1 countries i a conti- lerica with the pafTage 3r the paf- iliar to hot entitled to g leave to }hers, that low widely guous, and :o the con- have been to believe, h-America freights of i about the thcr fouth, navigators ularjr. ( ci ) have found between the two continents, are pro- bably the fragments of the land which once ftretch- cd from one continent to the other. It is highly probable that the principal population of Ameri- ca was accomplilhed before this feparation took place ; and at the fame time many of the animals of Afia may have pafled into America, and many of thofe of America may have paffed into Afia. If there had ever been fuch an equinoftial union of America and Africa, as Clavigero conjeftures, would not many of the quadrupeds and other ani- mals of the laft of thefc countries have been dif- covered in tha countries of Chili and of Peru, and in faft in the whole of South- America ? But very few of the quadrupeds of Africa have been difco- vered in South -America, and the quadrupeds of this portion of the new-world arc, in a great mea- fure, peculiar to it. Neither the elephant, the rhinoceros, the hippopotamos, or the giraffe, have ever been difcovered in America. Again, the Chilefe horfc*, and beaverf, the pacos, the vicugna, have not been found in any part of the world but in Sputh-Amcrica. It will be faid, that thefc obfervations rather favour the opinion that although America appears to have received all its human inhabitants from * Equns blfulcus of Molina, f Caftor huidobrius of Molina* i > (." ■ ' ( cii ) ^ the old-world, it has not received its animal* from the fame quarten. I do not doubt, that America has received fcveral fpecics of quadrupeds from Afiaand from Europe j and perhaps thcfe countries have received in return fomc of the animals of America. At any rate, ij: is certain, that feveral of the quadrupeds knowrv to" naturalifts are com- mon to Afia, and to America j and fomc few arc common to thefe two continents and to Europe. But many other animals have never been found in •ny other part of the world than in America ; and thefe I am willing, at prcfent, to confider as ex- clufively appertaining to America. Every thing, in my opinion, fupports the notion, that there has been a fcparate creation in the old and in the new world. Upon any other fuppofition than this, I am unable to explain the circumftance of our continents having the raccoon, the opoflum, the monax, the bifon, the pacos, and many other ani- mals. The notions of Mr. Pennant on this fubjeA are ingenious, but I do not think that they can be fupported*. As man is endowed with the capacity of inha- biting every climate ; and as he is impelled by many imperious neceflities to extend his empire over the whole world, it does not feem to have • Introdui^ion to the Ardic Zoology, p. 265, 266, 267, 268, 269. ^ ( cili ) limalt from at America jpeds from fe countries animals of that feveral ks are com- mc few arc to Europe. ;en found in nerica; and ider as ex- Lvery thing, lat there has 1 in the new than this, I ance of our polTum, the 17 other ani- this fubjeA iat they can ity of inha- impelled by his empire em to have z6$, z66, 267, been at all ncc*flary to have created, as many wri- ters have imagined, a different fpecies of men in every quarter of the world. But with many ani- mals the cafe is very different. Their latitudes arc much more circumfcribcd, and they have not the capacity of fupporting a variety of climates. In the prefcnt conftitution of thofc animals* and in the prefcnt temperature of the globe, the mufk- deer of Thibet could not have travelled to the forefls of Mexico or Peru, and the pacos could not have reached the mountains of Caucafus. It fecmi necelTary, then, to have created different fpecies of animals in different parts of the world. This obfervation applies flill more forcibly to many fpecies of vegetables. Thefe, being defVi- tutc of loco- motive powers, could not be extend- ed over the globe but by the agency of man. Ic is true that he has done much in this way. But when we find thoufands of fpecies of vegetables limited to particular countries, «nnd fooietimes to very narrow diftrifts of fuch countries, we defi- derate the agency of man, and fceni obliged to confefs, that with refpeft to vegetables in particu- lar, there has been a dif/crent creation in difierent portions of the world. North- America, it is true, poffcffes fome of the vegetables of Afia and of Europe. But what naturalift has difcovered in any other part of the world, any of the numcrnus fpecies of vegetables which are faid to be peculiar Ma..MbuiuMta|i«lkflMMi ■%i' 4* ' '■ ( civ ) • to America? Where, for inftance, arc the Lenni- Hittuck of the Delaware-Indians ?* Having, in the progrefs of this inveftigation, afcertaincd that the Americans, whom we have had an opportunity of contemplating, derive their origin from Afia, it were a defirable circum- ftance to know at what period the new population took place. But here we cannot walk with any degree of certainty. Many circumftances, howe- ver, render it probable that the population was accompliflied at different periods, fome of which muft have been extremely remote. " We do not doubt, fays Clavigero, that the population of America has been very Ancient, and more fo than it may feem to have been by Euro- pean aiithors. i. Becaufe the Americans wanted thofe arts and inventions, fuch, for example, as thofe of wax and oil for light, which, on the one hand, being very ancient in Europe and Afia, are on the other mod ufeful, not to fay neceffary, and when once difcovered, are never forgotten. 2; Becaufe the poliflied nations of the new- world, and particularly thofe of Mexico, prefer ve in their traditions and in their paintings the memory of the Creation cff the world, the building of the tov/- • See page-26, in the note. 4* the Lenni- %■ %^ vcftigation, m we have ng, derive lie circum- population Ik with any ices, howc- ulation was le of which •o, that the mcient, and n by Euro- :ans wanted rxample, as on the one id Afia, are ceflary, and gotten. 2; new- world, :rve in their memory of of the tov/- ( cv ) er of Bablc, the confufion of languages, and the difperfion of the people, though blended with fome fables, and had no knowledge of the events which happened afterwards in Afia, in Africa, or in Europe, although many of them were fo great and remarkable, that they could not eafily have gone from their memories. 3. Becaufe neither was there among the Americans any knowledge of the people of the old continent, nor among the latter any account of the paffage of the former to the new-world. Thefe reafons, concludes our author, we prefume, give fome probability to our opinion*." Thefe arguments are not conclufive. I am willing to admit that the ignorance of the Ameri- cans concerning fome of the ufeful and leaft pe- rifhable arts is a ftrong proof of the high antiqui- ty of the nations of the new- world. I do act place as high a value upon the ftory that thevPxicans and other nations of America preferve the me- mory of the creation of the world, the confufion of languf.ges, &c. I do not mean to deny that veftiges of fuch traditions may have been prefer- ved J but I regret that there is fo much reafon to doubt a large portion of what authors, particularly the Jefuits, have faid upon the fubjeft. Clavige- ro's third argument is, perhaps, leaft of all cnti- P • Vol. II. p. 202. JV.4JU||(L]-Jl. U ! ** ; mA a ''' ' ( cvl ) tied to attention* He himfelf tells us thatBotu- rini, whom I have already mentioned, afferts, that the Toltecas had painted their journey in Afia,. and their firft fcttlement in America, &c* j and Mr. de Guigncs, in a memoir which 1 cannot now procure, affures us, that the Chincfc prcferve ill their annals, the hiftory of a voyage to America, early as the year 458 of our aera. What degree of credit may be due to Buturinis aiTcition, or to the hiftory of the Chinefc navigation, I cannot pretend to determine. If it be admitted, that the comparative view which I have exhibited uf the languages of Ame- rica with thofe of Afia and Europe, is a proof of the famenefs of the people of thefe portions of the world; and if it be admitted, that the other cir- cumftances which I have mentioned, cftablilh the der'iva^of the Americans from the old-world, it mayHn be rendered highly probable, that the periods of the eftablifliment of many American nations in their new fettlements arc extremely re- mote. Clavigero remarks, that the Americans " fhew great firmnefs and conftancy in retaining their languagest-" This, as far as my inquiries have extended, appears to be ftriftly true. The languages of many of the tribes of North- Ameri- ca have undergone lefs alteration in the term of one hundred and fifty years, than the generality of • Vol. I. p. 87. t Vol. II. p. 210. I '♦, J -n- hatBotu- ferts, that r in Afia, Sec*; and annot now ircferve ill > America, hat degree tion, or to I, I cannot rative view ;s of Ame- a proof of tions of the e other cir- rftablifti the old-world, bk, that the f American [tremely rc- i Americans in retaining my inquiries true. The arth-Ameri- the term of generality of [. p. 210. ( cvii ) the poliflied languages of Europe in the fame time. Since, then, the languages of America are fo gra- dual in their change, it will appear probable that many hundred, perhaps three or four thoufand, years have been neceffary to produce the differ- ence of dialefts which we obfcrve between ma- ny American and Afiatic nations. lam notignorantthattheconje(5lure!whichIhave hazarded concerning the remotencfs of the pe- riods at which many of the American tribes fepa- rated from their parental ftocks in the old-world, does not accord with the fentiments of feme ce- lebrated writers on the fubjedt. What Mr. de Buffon has written concerning the phyfical infan- cy of the new-world, and the recent date of its population, is known to every one*. We are of- ten charmed, we arc fomctimes conquered, by the eloquence of this writer. His fc^^H-s arc numerous. A late writer J, who uniteWWtalents of a poet and philofopher to the abilities of aphy- fician, adopts the opinion, that America has been raifed out of the ocean at a later period of time than the other three quarters of the globe. He imagines, that the proofs of this hypothefis are to be found in the greater comparative heights of the n\oun- tains of America, the greater coldnefs of its rc- • Hifloire Naturellc, Vol. VI. &c. I Dr. Erafmus Darwin. TW W ( cviii ) fpcftive climates, the Icfs fize and ftrength of its animals, and the *^ lefs progrcfs in the improve- ments of the mind of its inhabitants in refpcft to voluntary exertions§." But what arc we to fay of the vaft number of the fpecics of animals and vegetables in America, of their magnitude, &c. ? Thcfc are, furely, no proofs of the phyfical infan- cy of America. On the contrary, in this vaft portion of the world, we difcover the influence of a hand which moulded matter into forms at periods extremely remote : we have good reafons to believe as remote as in any other parts of the world. The phyfical infancy of America is one of the manydrcams of the flumbering philofophers of our times. It remains for me to fay a very few words con- ccrninj^he comparative antiquity of the feveral tribes^Bnations of America. Thefe ihall clofe this direRlne. A very learned writer has fuppofed, that the lyiexicans and Peruvians came later into the new- world than any of the other Americans. It is his opinion th-'t " the ancient Mexicans and Peruvians fcem to be defcendcd fl%m thofe nations, whom Kuhlaikhan fent to conquer Japan, and who were difperfed by a dreadful ftorm, and it is probable § Zoonomis, tec. vol. I. p. 512. London. 1796, 410. ml »th of its improve- refpcft to we to fay imals and Lide, &c. ? ical infan- i this vaft e influence } forms at od reafons irts of the ica is one lilofophers words con- the fcvcral : fhall clofe d, that the the ncw- . It is his 1 Peruvians Ota, whom 1 who were is probable ^6. 4tQ. ( cix ) that fomeofthcm were thrown on the coaft of Ame- rica, and there founded thefc two great empires*." The antiquity of the Mexicans and Peruvians may confidently be traced to a more remote pe- riod than that juft mentioned. The annals of theie people afcend much higher. But I reft their antiquity upon another circum- ftance. It is the little refemblance that is to be found between their languages and thofe of the old-world. By the fame mode of reafoning, I conclude that the Six-Nations, and iheir brethren,- the Cheerake, the Chikkafah, and Choktah, are of very ancient eftablifliment in America, though probably pofterior to the Mexicans and Peruvi- ans. On the contrary, all the nations of the De- laware-ftock feem to have taken pofleffion of the countries of America at a much later pe^/^k The Delawares themfelves appear to be a nnmPhcient people than the Chippewas,Sawwannoo, and other tribes fpeaking their languages. • Obfervations made during a voyage round the world, &c. By John Reinold Forfter, L. L. D, &c. p. 316. London: 1778. 4to. According to our author, Kublai-Khan reigned from the year 1259 to 1294 a||he Ch illian era. M END OF THE PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 11 —TW 4. • COMPARATIVE VOCABULARIES. I. G O D. Lenni-Lcnnape, or Dc- lawares. Chippewas. Minfi* Mahicanni. Shawnees. Miamis. Meflifaugers. Algonkins. Indians ofPenobfcot? and St. John's. 5 Indians of New-Eng- land. Narraganfets, &c. Naticks. Scnccas. - Kit/cbi'Matmittty Pata- mawosy Kctannotooweet. ' Kitcbi-Miinitouy Mamit- too. Pacbtamawosy Gicbtan-' nettowit. Kcelhello- meh, the maker of the foul. Mannittooh, Puhtam- mauwoas, Fottamau- woos. Manitaby Wift-Mamitto^ Weftbilliqua. j Mmoitowa? Mungo-Minnato. KitchmanUtu. Jeeneois. Ketan (wood). Manit, Manittoo. ManittoOy Manittoom. Haueneu, Howwcncah. ttrnt-IMmxa •'sr- GOD. Niyob. Nioh, Hawoniaf, Hauwcncyoo. Necyooh. Ycwauneeyooh. yiatio (r. p. brbbceuf). ff^akoa, Tongo-fTakon. Eefcekee-cefa. JJhtohooHo-Aha. Coyococop'ChiU. Coyoeofchill (bossu.) Jeotl, Teutl. Nim Ahvali " the great lord." Tupdna^ Titpa. Viracocboy Paebacamac. Kamtchadals, - 158. Kootcba. Mohawks. Qnondagos. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Canadians. Naudoweffies. Mufkohgc. Choktah. Natchez. Akanzas. Mexicans. Poconchi. Brafilians. Peruvians. Scmoyads, Tartars, Semoyads, Japanefe. Mordva, - ^59- - 160. 126, 128. 93- laj, 124. 125. 61. Kootcbaee. Koot, Norn. Ma. Nga. Ngoa. Sin, Kami berg:]:.) Paas. (thum- f Hawenio, in Iroquois, according to Lo&iel. X Sin and Cami, " ■ God, a Spirit, or Immortal Soul." Koempfer. 'vonia\, fOO, yooh. >. brbbcbuf). mgo-ff^akott. ecfa. Aha, Chill. / (bossu.) tl. /, " the great '^ttpa. Pacbacamac. mi (thum- ■) to Loflciel. Immorul Soul." II. HEAVEN. Lcnni-Lennapc. - Chippewas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. Naticks. Narraganfets, &c. Acadians. Indians of Virginia. Kikkapoos. *< Montagnars de Ca- nada." Algonkins. Indians of Penobfcot 7 and St. John's. \ Qnpqdagos. Hurons. t Chilefc. Awqffagatnme, Wclanna- toowccnink. \ Spemittkahwin. Awojacbgamme. Spummuk. Spimiki. Kefukqut. Kcsfuckt *< the he&vens." Oiiajeck. (delaet.) Q/?«, " heavens" (cap- tain smith). Kift/ekf *'J^'" Ouafcouptz (r. p.#fAS- se). Spiminkakouin. Spumpkeeg. Garocbia, Toendi (lahontan). Huenoy Huenu\. X Hoequi. Vocabularium Barbaro-Virgineornm. t See Hawonia, Hauweneypo, &c. in the preceding arti- cle. The Chilefe call the moon, 7//«. n fi'i 4 HEAVEN. Tartars, 90,91)91. Kook. jwii^ 91. Kittawini, •> 164. jTWfm • Tain, Tain. Japancfe. Ten, " Heavens, the Sky" (thvnbero). III. FATHER. Lenni-Lennape. fVetocbmend. Nmb, my father. Gmb, thy ' father. Chippewas. Notjab. Mahicanni. Weetohane. Nooh, my father. Shawnccs. Noothau, Notbtt, Ofe* p wah. Naticks. Noojh,, my father. Koofi, thy father. Pottawatameh. Nofah. Miamis. Nen/aby Ochfeemauh. - . Nochfau, NoDih, my ' father. Meflifaugers. Nofau. " Montagnars de Ca- nada." Neuta (r. p. ma«se). Algonkins. Neufce, eavensj the rHVNBERC), R. d. Nwchy my Goocbi thy "„ Nooh, my Notbtt, Ofe* father. Koo/h^ er. j>chfeemauh. 1, Noiahj my . p. ma«se). FAT U E R. 1 [ Acadians, Noucbick (uE i.aet). ^'' Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's. Meetungus. Indians of Ncw-Er ig- land. Noepow (wood). Narraganfcts, &c. OJh, Nojh'y NooHi, my ! father. Cojh, your father. Canadians. • y^j^- ; - Albanians, - 45- Mamma t Nanna. Iiau. Carclians, - 56. MooamOy Mam«. , ah. Olonetzi, - 57. Mamo. r mother. Zhiryane, 59- Mamo. Permiaki, 60. Mam. Koriakij - iS3' Memme. V. S N. 1 Lenni-Lennape. 'iVj«M|-N'q"ces,my fon nque. ^iffally lis fon. ■ Mahicanni. - Ottayooman ? Nacicks. - Tfunnaumon. « Shawnccs. - Nickethwah, Nequitha. • Miamis. - Ninquiflab. Nitfoatit my V fon. (thunberg). Mcflifaugers. . Neechaunifs, my fon. Algonkins. - NitianiSy fons. Acadians. • Nekov'is (de lait). Namun. 1 Indians of Penobfcot 7 and St. John's. y Indians of Ncw-Eng-7 NaumaunaiSy my fon land. i (wood). Canadians. - Aen (r. p. brebcbuf). Mohawks. m Ronwaye. Onondagos. - Hthawak. Mufkohge. - Choppootclie. I ^ifes, according to Lofkiel. NiJliaMHus, fon and diughter. Vocabularium Barbaro^Virgineorum. iii M' i if i jr i nt ■ •^""^'Hl'W^'W^ •iJ.'J S^g.m Choktah. Mexicans. Poconchi. SON. Galibis. Carai'bes. Brafilians. Peruvians, Chilcfe. Poolkoos-Nockcne. Tepiltzin. Acun. Vacun, my fon. • Avacurit thy fon. Racun, his fon. Ca- (un, our fon. Ava- cuntdi your fon. Ca- cuntacquBy their fon. Mourou. Imakouy Imoulou, Tamein- ri, Nirdheuy my fon. Taira. Cbutim. Botutn. MMHM-«)Sl5S8Q8!K»->-»-»'»" Semoyads, - 125. Nioma. m. 120, 121, 122. NioO. Kamaftlhini, - 13 a- ^<'^' Permiaki, - 60. Zen. VI. DAUGHTER. Lcnni-Lennape. Naticks. Shawnccs. Indians of New-Eng- land. fFdarf\. N'daun, my daughter. fFdanall, his daughter. IVuttaun. Nuttaunes, my daughter. Nelonnetha. Namais ? my daughter (wood). ^ J>anijs, on the authority of LoiucL DAUGHTER. II l*Jockcnc. tilt my Ton. thy fon. lis fon. Ca- fon. Ava- »ur fon. Ca- f, their fon. mloUf Tameitt- beuy my fon. ER. N'daun, my ;r. fVdanallt ghter. Nuttmnes, my tcr. my daughter ). ■ m Miamis, Meffifaugcrs. Indians of Pcnobfcot 7 and St. John's. \ Acadians, according \ to De Laet, p. 53. 5 Onondagos. Neejhan, Nintana, my daughter. Nectaunifs, my daughter. Weeduzer. Netoucb, or Pecenmoucb. Mufkohgc. Mexicans. Scmoyads, Echrojebdwak. Chuchhooftee, Teucbpoch. 1 26. Nieta. 127, 128. Ne. 129. Neep. VII. BROTHER. Lenni-Lennapc. Chippewas. Mahicanni. Naticks, Shawnees. Pottawatameh. Miamis. Indians of New-Eng- land. Illinois. Algonkins. Indians of Bcnobfcot and St. John's. Nimat. Kimat, thy bro- ther. Neconnis. Netahcan, Nochhcfum. Neemat. Kematy thy brother. " Negenena. Sefah. Sbeemab. Netchaw (wood). Nika, my brother (hen- neimn). Ntcanicb. Neccheer. in III Mmtitmmttfmt^mm^tmMi'Mimhii 12 BROTHER. 1 -m Acadians, according? to De Lact, p. 53. 5 Narraganfcts, &c. - Onondagos. - Tufcaroras. Hurons, according to ? Lahontan. 5 Checrakc. Woccons, Mexicans. Daricn-Indians. Skinetch. JVeemat. lattatege. Caunotka, Necautkch. Tat/tt my brother. Kcnaulch ? Tenraube. Teoquichtuicb. ,fL*opab. Semoyads, Tchiochonflci, Toungooli, Lefghls, 120. Naiooy Neka. 1 21 . Neeneka. Neenaika, Seezoee. Nokkoom. Needoo-Nokoonmee, Ooats. 122. - 54. 140. - 141. 50,51. VIII. } Lenni-Lennape. Mahicanni. Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's. Acadians, according? to De Laec, p. 53. 3 Narraganfcts, &c. Onondagos. SISTER. Cheefmust Tauweema. Neetaumpfoh. Upbomomoott. Nekkht. fVeticks. Jkzia. M-.-«-«-<)S;;«S;iS3^,>*H.»->.»- j| # ».-.'iaKL«_- SISTER. n Necautkch, rother. 7. Qonmee, I R. lauiveema. oh. ». Scmoyadsj Lefghis, Toungoofi, 1 20. Na'maioo, Nenaka, 'Nehoko. 121. Nebakoo^ Nem, Papaoo. 53. Akiejfio. 141. Nadaoo-Nokoomee^ 143. Nokoon. IX. HUSBAND. Lenni-Lennape. Chippcwas. ^ Shawnces. Miamis. Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's. Narraganfets, &c. - IVecbiatty your hufband. * Ochechee. Weewahrab. Nonnewarradeeock ? JVafick. Cheremifli, Semoyads, 62. Wat an. 120. Waeezako. X. WIFE. Lcnni-Lennape. Chippcwas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnces. Pottawatamch. Miamis. Meffifaugcrs, Wiwallt his wife. * Weewon. # Neowah. Neeweewabf my wife. -^■H-- TifTit|iBrf:.'^^jiJjjJjrj t^iy i O ' Hl.'ilr ' rC'J ' ■: ' '', n»,rrt > i;-'-fTi-i ii T i ;n' . ri- . - i -rr i -t--'"''- *- — ^■■^■*~'-^^.'-n>*.i ■.*: ,4 W I F E. Kikkapoos. # Piankafhaws. * Algonkins. • Indians of Penobfcot 7 and St. John's. 3 Neefeeweeock •/ Narraganfets, &c. fVeewOyMitt gana. Scnccas. Mohawks. m Onondagos. * Cayugas. • Oneidas. * Tufcaroras. Kateocca. Cochnewagocs. ♦ Wyandots. « Naudo we flies. * Cheerake. # Muflcohge. • Chikkafah. * Choktah. * Katahba. * Woccons. Tecauau. Natchez. * Mexicans. ♦ Poconchi. * Darien-Indians. * -.-«-<-.-4)SSS'SS©;»"»-^>-»- Morduani, - 6i. Neeza. Vogoulitchi, 66. Nfi Nairn, -; 67 Ne. :'M^. WIFE. wtmuSiJVullo- ••i^ Oftiaks, Scmoyads, Tchouktchi, Koiballi, Tartars, 70. Ne. 121. Neoo. 157. Neivegen, Newen, 133. Naiooza. 96. Koodeet. 97. Kaddi. 10 1. /Ca//. XL VIRGIN Lenni-Lennape. Chippcwas. Mtnfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. Pottawatameh. Miamis. Meflifaugers. Kikkapoos. Algonkins. Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's. Acadians, according to De Laet. Narraganfets, &c. Scnecas. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Kikochquees. Jeckwaffin, girl. Ickwee^ woman. OchqueJiSi a girl. Peefquaufoo, a girl. SquauthautbaUt a girl. Konejfwah, girl. IckoueJfenSf girl. Nun/keenoofey girl. Kihtuckquaw. # Ixhagonif Ecbro, girl. * , ^, ,. -.-.-■.-^..-..M^-.... ,. -.,.,...*.-■■>%.. MRW ■W^^-^I^IP" it VIRGIN. Oneidas. • ■ ^ Tufcaroras. M f- ■ ■ Cochnewagoes. * Wyandots. • Naudoweffies. * '■■m Chccrakc. * Mufkohgc. Hoctoccoy a girl. Chikkafah. »^='i\r'- .- „ Chokcah. Katahba. Woccons. Natchez. • Mexicans. * ■■ ' Poconchi. * Darien-Indians. Neenabt a girl. -«-*-<"«-"»-»~ Kangatfi, in Indcpcn- 7 j^^^^ dant Tartary, 100.3 Tclcouti, Scmoyads, 10 1. Kijfeetfchak. 121. Nedookoo. 123. Nieetfchoo. 124. Chajfakoo. 135. /Co(7*, Koeoekett, Okeai. Okeen. Mogul-Tartars, Bourcti and Kalmuks, Vogoulitchi, - 69. Necoy Anee. Oftiaks, - 70. Nemaiwrem, Ewa. . - 71. Ewi. - 72,73. Oeggooee, , !f'iU»iijiiiijt!J|:il|!iji(iV I BOY. rl. fff, Okeeyi. Ewa. XII. BOY. Lenni-Lennape. - Pilaivetfchitfcb. Chippcwas. • Minfl. Skabanfu. Mahicanni. * Shawnees. • Pottawatamch. • Miamis. ^ieviftab. Meffifaugcrs. • Kikkapoos. • Piankafhaws. • Algonkins. « Indians of Pcnobfcot " _ and St. John's. Skeenoofe. ■rx AcadianS) according to 1 3 Dc Laet, p. 53. Narraganfets, &c. Wujkeene. Scnccas. • Mohawks. • Onondagos. Haxbauy Utbawak, Cayugas. • Oncidas. • Tufcaroras. Wariaugh, Cochncwagoes. - ■ ' i Wyandots. • NaudowefTies. • Cheerake. * '^'i D p iiiy' * ' ii'i[.iniiiiir)ron(iit')ij-;r' >il ■ffj":'-.-J-ft: i it-^'"'' "'"T"'^'^""''"''''' '' "— •"" a..^■^^.^-J^^. 'IN''. :| IS BOY. Mufkohge. - Chcpaunwah. Chikkalah. * ' * Choktah. * Katahba. Woccons. • ■ ,''''■ Natchez. Mexicans. • Poconchi. Daricn-Indians. • " ^' ''* -:■"■ XIII. CHILD. Lenni-Lcnnape. Nit/cb, Nitfcbaan. Chippcwas. Bobelojhin. Minfi. • Mahicannt. • Shawnccs. Hipp'ilutha, Pottawatameh. • Miamis. - Ahpeeluftab, young child. Mcflifaugers. • Kikkapoos. « Piankafhaws. Pappooz. Algonkins. BobiloucbitiSt child, little children. , Indians of Pcnoblcot 7 « and St. John's. 5 Narraganfcts, &c. - Papoos. - Onondagos. - I^^^^^- Tufcaroras. - IVoccaneokne, i ir- ■ ■ ; , -^ ' ;"^*^"'"'r K baan. young child. , child, little f. CHILD. -'M-^M^iiSsss^is;* Scmoyads, Suanetti, Votiaki, Vogoulitchi, Kottowi, 1,23. Niitfchoo. 110. Bobfch. 65. Nooke. 6j. yieepoo, Aeehoom 149. Poop. Inhabitants of the Kou-? nlfkie-Iflands, 162.3 ^ XIV. MAN. Lcnni-Lennapc. ■ Lenm. » Chippewas. MiJJinapey Lennit, Anne, nch, Ninnee. Minfi. Lcnnowcgh. Mahicanni. Nemonnauw. Shawnces. JIlenni,Uimcc,Ileti»iyLinm, Pottawatameh. * Miamis. Ablanuab. Meflifaugcrs. * s- -' "-V- Kikkapoos. • -.,...-__... Piankalhaws. ■ • «-.-.*.,.-.. Algonkins. Aliftnape, '"'' ' Indians of Penobfcot \ Sanumbee. . . ' ' and 5t. John's. * " 5 • Narraganfctts, &c. - Nnin. Acadians, according to \ Kejfona. Pc Laet, p. 53 r > -'■*."■ ^Mt i t i l II r .c I I r - in ii n< iiM. 'r MMii.iii m r 19 MAN. Indians of New-Eng- land, according to J Purchas. Scnecas. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oncidas Tufcaroras. Cochncwagocs. Wyandocs. Naudowcfilcs. Checrakc. Mufkohgc. Chikkafah. Choktah. Katahba. Cbije, " an old man." Hogedagh ? Ratfin. • Unque. Et/ihinak, a man . Eetfen-Caunegauteel ? Entequost a man. Ijla? Iftec-Hoononwah. Nockcnch. Scmoyads, - 121. Nenetfchy Nenatfche, , 122. Ncnnetfee, 123. Enmetjche. - - 124. Ennetfcbe. 72j73»74. J^ajfee. 74. Gqjfe, - 102. Kaife. 104. Keje. 106. Keejfee, 64. Seen, 131. Chajfa. ' Oftiaks, Bucharians, Kirguiffi, Yakouti, Tchouvafhi, Tawceguini, t ? 'r. -' - \ i) II I ij i jL r tr-n ■i.niiti n.i Id man." binak, zm&n. *auteel f nan. Hoononwah. enatfche. HEAD. Ik XV. H E A D. I^nni-Lennapc. Chippewas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. MiM«HM«ri«-M*- ] Pottawatameh. Miamis. Meflifaugcrs. Kikkapoos. Piankafliaws. Algonkins. Indians of Pcnobfcot and St. John's. Acadians, according to 7 Do Laet, p. 53. \ Narraganfets, &c. ^ Sankikani. Scnecas. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oiicidas. Tufcaroras. Cochncwagocs. JFibl, H^iquajek. Oujiecouan, Nindip. Utup, Dup. IVeenftSt his hf d. Wcclckch. Wiejeh, his head. Endeeabpukabnee, Oufticouatty UJiigon^ Neetop^ tVoodtum. Menougi, Uppaquontop, JVyer. 'O wara. Ootaure^ * ■•:V'1 t I- Vf«rittiii — '■'* 'It m HE A D. Wyandots. .. ■',--'■ V '■ ■ Naudoweflies. ■ ♦'.: Clieerake. • , * Mulkohge. Ifteka, Eca. Eka,hishead, Chikkafah. Skoboch. Choktah. * Katahba. » Woccons. Poi>pe. Natchez. - * Mexicans. 4*^ 7 Tzontecontli. ,#, Poconchi. r Holonii Na. Darien-Indians. - , s-». Indians of Guaiana, cal- ' ^ , led by Dc Laet, Ja- Boppe. ■ ' ' . " . V ioi.f ^ 4 Brafilians. Acan, Peruvians. m -\ t I ought to have mentioned, under the head of Father and Mother, that thefe Indians call Father, Pape, and Mother, Immer. According to Pallas, the Koriaki, 153. call father Pepe, and other Koriaki, 155. ^/'- The inhabitants of the ifland of Karaga, near the north-eaft coaft of Kamtchatka, ,56, call Father, Papa. The Taweeguini, or Taiks, (Pal- las, 131) call Mother, Emma. The Shcbaioi, another nation of Guaiana, call Mother. Hamma. According to Pallas, the Semoyads, 129, in the diftria of Timfkago, call Mother, Amma. The Toungoofi. 143. call Mother, Amee. The YoKagirri, 147, on the lenifea, Ama : the Kottowi, 149, and the Affani, 150, both living in the vicinity of the Jenifea, in Siberia, Ama. Other Siberian tribes, 151, 15*, ^"i* a>hishead^ i.>'.i',V, ^ HEAD. 23 Chilcfc. - Lonco, Towonghen, '■ Scmoyads, 126. Old. • 127,128,129. Olio. Karafllni, - 130. Jeebada, Hollad. Kamaftlhini, - 1^2. Ooloo. Koiballi, - 133. Ooloo. Yokagirri, - I47- Monolee. Altekcfeck-Abif-7jj^^ A/t^. nnian, j Kufhazibb*. nian !ibb-Abiffi-? „3_ j^_ XVI. NOSE. >f Father and and Mother, i, call father itants of the iCamtchatka, raiks, (Pal- [lother nation ) Pallas, the call Mother, jimee. The wi, 149, and the JeniTea, 5 a, i^w. Lenni-Lennape. fVikiwon. Chippcwas. Injofh, roch, Yotch. Minfi. "Wichke, Wichkiwan. Mahicanni. Okewon. Shawnees. Ochali. ■ Pottawatatneh. Ottfchafs. Miamis. - ■> Keewahnee. Mcfiifaugcrs. • Kikkapoos. • Piankafhaws. • Algonkins. Yach. Indians of Penobfcot 7 and St. John's. 5 Keeton. ' *■' '' *- " Acadians, according to ' ; Chichkoft% Dc Lact. - 5 wi»..««fc*^w-i-. si,at*.iwUi^m h^-. r;? «4 NOSE. Indians of New-Eng- land, according to ► Peecbten, Purchas. ^ Narraganfcts, &c. • Sankikani. Akywan. . Senecas. • Mohawks. Onuhfah. Onondagos. Oniochja. Cayugas. • Oneidas. • Tufcaroras. • Cochnewagoes. • Wyandots. Yuungah. Nabdoweflics. • Cheerake. - .♦ Muflcohgc. Iftecopooh. Chikkafah. EbitchcUa. Choktah. • Katahba. • ■ -;-;. -.^^- Woccons. • Natchez. • Mexicans. * . Poconchi. • Darien-Indians. • Brafilians. Thy Ty. Carai'bes. Nicbiri. -<-«-<"<-*^^^ Zhiryane, 59. Pel. Pcrmiaki, 60. Pel. Mokfliane, 62. Peelai. Cheremiffi, 63. Peeleekfcb, Pilijcbo, Votiaki, 65. Pel. Vogoulitchi, 67,68,69. Pal, Pel, Pail. Oftiaks, 70 »72»73>74. ■? Peel, Peel, Peel. jchtfko. irs. NamiyjCzn. ■ I Ujcho, I. el, Peel, FOREHEAD. XIX. F( 0] R.EHEAD Lenni-Lcnnapc. • JVochgalau, Chippewas. - Nekatick. Minfi. - • Mahicanni. - « Shawnees. - Nefcch. Pottawatameh. • Miamis. - • Melfifaugcrs. « Kikkapoos. - * Piankafhaws. - • Algonkins. » Indians of Penobfcot I * and St. John's. Narraganfcts, &c. - # Indians of Pcnnfylvania. Hackdlu. Acfadians, according to " De Lact. Tegoeja. Sankikani. \ - Nachkaronek, Scnccas. * Mohawks. • Onondagos. Ogcenquara. Cayugas. * Oncidas. * Tufcaroras. • Cochncwagocs. * Wyandots. • •^•♦-^-♦-^XWiiiSSSK*-*"*-*-*- 49 ^ Tooflietti, Oftiaks, Loparij FOREHEAD. 1 16. Haka. 72. Taeedaga. 58. Kalloy Gallo. XX. HAIR. Lenni-Lennapc. Milacb. Chippcwas. Lifts, Liffy. Minfi. • Mahicanni. Wechauknum, hair of the head. Shawnees. Neleetbe. Pottawatameh. Winfis, hair of the head. Miamis. Neerssfab, Meffifaugers. '# Kikkapoos. '• Piankaihaws. • Algonkins. Liffisy Liffy. Indians of Pcnobfcot \ \ and St. John's. [ \ Peerfoo. Narraganfets, &c. Wejheck. Muppacuck, " a. long lock." Acadians, according to ? Monzaben. Dc Lact. S Senccas. • Mohawks. • Onondagos. Onuchquir^. Cayugas. • Oneidas. • Tufcaroras. Oowaara. Cochncwagoes. • M WW _ 1 -W. f ^»^il>J l f,W IM |W i - HAIR. 3« hair of the f the head. )pacuckf *' a Wyandots. Naudoweflics. Cheerake. Mufkohge. Chikkafah. Choktah. Katahba. Woccons. Natchez. Mexicans. Iftcka-eefc, hair of the head. Pache, Pa/e, hair of the head. Tummt. TzontU. Vindae, in Carniola7 i^/rgg^ and Lufatia, 6. 3 Mogul-Tartars, 135. Iffu Kartalini, - 108,109. Tma, Tonu. Oftiaks, - 11. Warrat. Suanetti, - no. Patco. Carelians, - 5^- 7*''**''> '^°^^^^ Olonetzi, - 57- Tookkoo. Votiaki, - 65. leerfee, Erjee. XXI. MOUTH. Lenni-Lennape. Chippcwas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. Wdoon. Meejfey. Ochtun. Otoun. l i r " r-'?tf il tf^~T- ■ ■ ■' — '-—■■■" ■•'■ ' ""I " ^ ' ^.ti.Ji.^m .-^ , I r «i "'1 -ilJ^ 3« MOUTH. Indoun, Indown. Endonee, Pottawatamch. Miamis. Mcfllfaugcrs. Kikkapoos. Piankafhaws. Algonkins. Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's. ^Dt'Tir"*'*^'-^'"! ^'^'*'' ^^^^^'^ the lips Narraganfcts, &c. >/ Pampticoughs. Sankikani. Senccao. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochncwagocs. Wyandots. Naudowcflles. Chcerakc. Mufkohgc. Chikkafah. Choktah. Katahba. Woccons. Natchez. Mexicans. Madoon. Toonne, Ixhagachr">■ Karafllnit 130. Ende. Tawccguini, 131. Oengde. Kamaftfhini, 132. Ang. Semoyads, 126. ^ngda. 124. Mepho. Toungoofi, 143. HamooK, Inhabitants of the So- 7 ^ . cicty-Ifles. 5 Inhabitants of the \ Mdtoo Friendly- Lies. 3 Inhabitants of Eaftcr- ? q^ Ifland. 5 Inhabitants of the Mar- 7 v^v/j/, qucfas. \ '^ NOTE. The words in the language of the Society-Ifles, Friendly- Ifles, Eaftcr- Ifland, and the Marquefas, are taken from Dr. Forfter's Obfervatiom, already mentioned. They are placed here to fliow, that there is fame refemblance between the langua- ges of thefe iflands and the languages of the Americans. Com- pare thefe words with Ochtun, Otoun, Melon. Vt. f orfter ob" ferves, that if we " confult the Mexican, Peruvian, and Chilefe vocabularies, and thofe of other American languages, we find not the moft diftant, or even accidenul fimilarity between any of the American languages, and thofe of the SouthSca I(le». F rrr -"■■"■■'"■"•■ , m im I II' f l vmf l 'rw,ifi i »i ■'■''•ir i? 3A N O T Iv. The colour, features, form, habit of body, and cuftoms of the Amcr ana, and thefcMllanderj, arc, he fays totally different ; as evcrv one convcif.int with the fubjeft, will calily difcovtr. Nay, the diilancei of 600, 700, 800, or even 1000 leagues between the continent of America and the Kallernmoft of thefe ides, tojctlicr with the wrctchednefj and fmall fize of their veflcls, prove, in my opinion, incontcftably, that thefe idander.i never came fiom A:ncrica." Ohfirvatiou, i^c.p. 280, I have no heiitation in Aibfcribing to Dr. Forfler's opinion, that thefe ifl.inder? arc not cniigr.ii;ts from America ; but I do not think the (lOi'lor has treated this fubjedt with his ufual learning, and nc( utcncfs. The American words, in his Compcrati'vi 7}iliJt, ate very f-"\.' in number, and arc entirely confined to the languages of thj ALxiians, the Peruvians, and Chilefe. Other American languages fhoulJ cTralnly have been noticed. The refult of tlie comparifcn would have been, that there are feme ixjortis nearly fimil.tr in the languages of certain American tribes, and in thofj of the idandcrs under confidcration. I may mention in this place, for I fliall not refume the fubjeft, that the Tufcaroras call water A-iuoo, and the Mufkohge, or Creeks, U'eixia. The inhabitants of the Society and Friendly Ifles, the Marquefas, &c. call it E-vclii ; the inhabitants of New- Caledciiia, 2'-t:vii), oee ; the inhabitants of Tanna, T-avai. Dr. I'orlU-r's aflertion, that the " colour, features, form, habit of body, and cuftoms of the Americans, and thefe iflanders, are totally di.Terent," is certainly too general. He himfelf tells us, fpcaking of the inhabitants of t'ae Socicty-Ifles, that the •* colour of their fkin is lefs tawny than that of a Spr.niard, and not fo coopery as ih-it of an American ; it is of a lighter tint than the faircfl complexion of an inhabitant of the Eall-lndian iHands; in a word, it is of a white, tiiidlured with a brownifti yellow, however not fo llrongly mixed, but that on the cheek of the f-.ireft of their women, you may cafil/ diftinguilh a fprcadin'^f blulh. From this complexion we find all the inter- medi.ue hues down to a lively brown," &c. Qhfer-vaticns, l3c. p. 229. 1 ihink that our Chcerakc-lndians are not d.^rker than NOTE. H culloms of the tally different ; calily difcovir. \ looo leagues rnmoft of thefe II fize of their it thefe iflander.i 280. I have no nion, that thefe I do not think il learning, and rativi Tablt, arc CO the languages Dther American The refult of arc feme •words rican tribes, and I may mention ibjeft, that the ge, or Creeks, •iendly Ifles, the itants of New- Tanna, T-avai . features, form, id thefe iflanders. He himfelf tells y-Ifles, that the " a Sp."niard, and )f a lighter tint " the Eall-lndian ivith a brovvnifli lat on the cheek lily diftinguilh a nd all the inter- Ohfcr-vaticns, i3c. ■■ not d.irker than a. Spaniard. I have plainly fccn the blii(h upon the fxc of Indian women. The inhabitants of the Martiucfis. "• arc in general more tawny than the farmer" [the people of the Society. lllcs] being fitualcd in the latitude of c/ 57 'South, nearer the line than the Society. IQes ' kcOf-Javatioin. Sec. p. 232. The complexion of the inhabitantj of the l-ricndly-incs " is of a darker hue, tlwn that of the comrnoniihy of the naiivcb in the Soiiety-lfles; though, in my opinion, it partakes of a lively brown, inclining fo f.ir toward., ihc red or coi)|;cr colour, as not to deferve the appellation of fwarthy." OhjWvatioiu, ^ li'c. p. 234. Thefe remarU* concerning the complexion of the people of the Socicty-inc!., l-riendly-Ifles, and Marqiicfas. will^ be futficient to rtiow the American naturalill. that the colour of thefe people and that of many American tribes ii not, as 1 r. Forller obferves, "totally diiFerent." In other phylical fea- tures, or circumftances, the difference is lefs eoniiderablc than our author fecms to fu;.pofe. But this is not the place to pur- fue the inquiry much farther. The pl.yf.cal and other relations of the Americans, and the people of other parts of the earth, will be minutely attended to in my large vork relative to this country. 1 (hall content myfelf, at prcfent, Nvith obferv- ing on this fubjeft, that the European philofophers labour under a great miftake infuppofmg, that the complexions of the Ameri- cans are fo uniform. O; nearly the fame. In many inftanccs. the different tribes, indepcn.'ently of admixture, differ very efTen- tially from each other, both in colour and in form. Thus, the Minfi, whom we commonly call Munfees. are very dark, and the Cheerake very light. Sometimes, a range of hills divides two American tribes (fpeaking the fame language) whofe com- plexions arc different. Dr. Forfter's remark that the cuftoms of the Americans and thofe of the people of the South-Sea- lllcs are totally different, is entitled to ftill lefs attention. But what, the reader will alk, is the purport of thefe obfervations ? Is it my intention to prove, or toafTert, that the people of America and thofe of the South-Sea-iHand!. .ir-e tl.r ame ? I anfwer no. I have thought it proper to corred what appeared to be an error of a NOTE. very learned man ; and I muft think it probable that the akceftors of fome of the Americans, and of the people of the Society- Illes, kc. had once fome connection with each other. This, it is probable, was ie/ore the continent of America and thofe if- lands received their prefent races of people from Afia, which feems to have been the principal founder/ of the human kind. XXII. TOOTH. I-enni-Lennape. ff^ipit. Chippewas. Tihbity Weebitt^ the teeth, Ncbetun, the teeth. Minfi. * Mahicanm. Weepeetan. Shawnees, Nippigee. Nepittallch, the teeth. Pottawatameh. Webit, teeth. Miamis. Neepeetah, Meflifaugers, * Kikkapoos. • Piankafliaws. '• Algonkins. lUity Tebit, teeth. Indians of Penobfcot \[ and St. John's. 1 1 Weebeedah. Acadians, according to ' ' De Laet. - ;i Nehidie, Narraganfets, &c. * ' Sankjkani. Wypyt. Senccas, * TOOTH. 37 It the aKcefiors Mohawks. • f the Society- Onondagos. Omtjchihjet tec her. This, it and thofe if- Cayugas. ^ - * n Afia, which Oncidas. ' ■* iman icind. Tufcaroras. _ • Cochnewagoes. • — Wyandots. .♦ H. NaudoweflTies. • Cheerake. • . Mufkohge. Iftenotech. Chikkafah. - Notch, teeth. /, the teeth, Choktah. _ • the teeth. Katahba. • Woccons. * Natchez. • epittallch, Mexicans. Tkntli. teeth. m-«-<-*mSSS5£8S:»-^-»-»- I. Lcfghis, 50,51. Zeebee. ^ 52. TJabee, Tfawei f Oftiaks, 71. Teeboo. 72. Teboo. ^ 120. Teebyeh. ^ -.1- Semoyads, teeth. 121. Teeoo^ Teebe, Indoftani, 168,169. Bahi. XXIII. TONGUE. Lenni-Lennape. Chippewas. Wilano. Outon, Ooton. ^,i^.,iu^-m / 38 TO N G U E. Minfi. • Mahicanni. Wecnannuh. Shawnees. • Pottawatameh. « Miamls. Neelahnee. Mclfifaugcrs. * Kikkapoos. • Piankafhaws. p * Algonkins. Outan^ Ooton. Indians of Penobfcot I and St. John's. fVeelauloo. Acadians, according to De Laet. I Nirnou. Narraganfets, &c. * Sankikani. Ppyeranou, Scnecas. m * Mohawks. • Onondagos. Enach/e, Hochelagenfes. OJnache. Cayugas. m Oneidas. « Tufcaroras. t Cochnewagoes. • Wyandots. • Naudowefiies. * Chcerakc. - • Mulkohgc. Ifte-tolaufwah. Chikkafah. Soolijh, Choktah. Soolijh, Katahba. • »> _-»- Vogoulitchi, 67. Neelm. Oftiaks, 70. Naileem. 73,74. Nailem. 109. Neena. Imeretians, Suanetti, no. Neen. Kartalini, 108. Ena. Koiballi, 133. Siool. Mogul-Tartars, 135. Kile^ Koele. Toungoofi, 141,142- Eemee, Boureti, 136. Kileen. Kalmuks, 137. ^(f/tfW, X^f/«». Tartars, 89. 7>^/. 90. Teel, Til. 91. r^/. 92,93. Teel. 94. 7K ?<•'/• 95,96. 7>^/ XXIV. BEAR D. Lenni-Lennape. JViittcney. Cbippcwas. Mijcbiton, Opeewye/ky il'nr^ ,ai-.T.»ito ^ 4€> BEARD. Minfi. • Mahicanni. • Shawnccs. Nitunia, Pottawatamch. • Miamis. • Meffifaugers. • Kikkapoos. • Piankafhaws. ' • Algonkins. Mi/cbiton. Indians of Pcnobfcot 7 and St. John's. 3 » Acadians, according to ? Dc Lact. X Migidion. Narraganfcts, &c. • Scnecas. • Mohawks. • Onondagos. Onujgera, Cayugas. • Oncidas. « Hochelagenfes. Hebelin. Tufcaroras. • Cochncwagocs. * Wyandots. • Naudoweffics. • Chccrake. • Mulkohge. Iftechockhcfch. Chikkafah. « Choktah. • Katahba. • ' Woccons. • I 1 BEARD. Natchez. Mexicans. Poconchi. Darlen-Indians. • • m — • 1 Chechengi, Eftlandlans, . 114. Mag, Maig, 55. Habie. Mm9 ^^ XXV. HAN D. Lcnni-Lennapc. - Nacbk, my hand. Chippewas. - - Neningcen. Indians of Pennfylvania. Ncch, Almjkm^ Olmjkm^ Laenjkatt, Lanjkan^. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnces. Pottawatameh. Miamis. Mcflifaugers. Kikkapoos. Piankalhaws. Algonkins. Indians of Pcnobfcot and St. John's. Acadians, according to Dc Laet. Narraganfets, &c. - . Oniikan. - Niligee, Ncninch. Enabkef. i OUeeheey hands. \ Niptden, I I take thefe word* from the Lutheri CatcchHmoi, and from the Nov* Sueciaefea Penfylvania in America L'efcriptio. G -llT^"' '-"'■' * . . * . 4a HA N D.*"^ ^cnccas. • Mohawks. « Onondagos. Eniage, Cayugas. • Oneidas. Snufagb. Tufcaroras. * Cochnewagocs. • Wyandots. - — * Naudowcflics. * Checrakc. • Mufkohge. Iftinkeh. Chikkafah. - Ilbock. Choktah. * Katahba. * Woccons. • Natchez. » Mexicans. Maytl. DaricR-Indians. • Poconchi. - - Cam. Akalhini, - 119. Nak. Altckefeck, - it 2. Eenape. Toungoofi, - 138. Naila. •.., I ■.!.■ - 139. Nalee. I - 142. Nala, XXVI. BELLY. Ler li-Lcnnape. Chippcwas. Wachtey. Mijhemoutt Ifquamach. Ill nillnri - BELLY. 43 Y. Tfquamach. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. Pottawatameh. Miatnis. Mefllfaugers. Kikkapoos. Pianka(haws. Algonkins. tieem^^. Omauchtci, Machty. * Mooyeeche. Mijhemout. Indians of Penobfcot 7 p,,/^,;,^,,. and St. John's. 5 Acadians, according to? ^. ^ De Lact. 5 * * Narraganfets, &c. Senecas. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas, Oneidas^^ Tufcaroras. Cochncwagocs. Wyandots, Otqucenta. « * Tchiochonlki, Carelians, Olonetzi, JC^rtalini, -54. Watjeey JVatzay IVatiza, 56. Watfcbtfcba^ Wattjcbxt. 57. Wattjcbo. - , 108. Mootzelee, • ^ ^ f 6 O t. tm XXVII. FOOT. Lenni-Lennape, Cbippewas, Nefittun. t)zAi,1botor feet. Minfi. T* • Mahicanni. }Ftbeton, his feet, Shawnees. > <» Pottawaumeh. - ^efit. Miamis. Neecabtee. Meflifaugers. > ■ . ♦ . , . _ Kikkapoos. ♦ Piankafliaws. #• Algonkins. • Mian, of IWfcot 1 ^^^^^ ^^,^^^ ^^^^ and St. John's, ^cadians, according to I « De Lae(. | Narraganfets, &c. Senecas^ r Mohawks. Oftondagos. « OJchfitm. Cayogas. ^ ♦ Qneidas. r • 'I'ufcaroras. - * • ^ Mt^tt, '}n tte language of ii» Indiau tf New>]^|aq4^ according to fwcha*. T. s^/, foot or feet, tHckf feetj. New.pm|m4r root. Cochnewagoes. Wyandots. Checrikb. Mulkohge. Chikkafah. Cara'ibei. Prafilians. Yeych. Nougouti, my foot, PI Semoyads, lai. Ngaeet Gaee, ■ 11 122. Nge* . 1 ■ -p -123. Ngo, ■ • 1247 ■^*» II - 125, l^goee, Pcrfians, - 76. Paee^ Paa, Bucharians, - 102, Paee. Tartars, - .96. jzak, ' I ' 97,100. yifak^ XXVIII. SKIN. Lenni-Lcnrl^pe. Chippewas. Onondagos, Chilefe. Lefghis, mmmmmmmmm Vogoulitchi, - Cbey, Pekkikkitt, w, Gmecbu'a,, Tciqai, 50. Cbeg. 51. Keg. - 67. TewL 66M. Twh ' i- ^^ f ii?r - 1"— — "■' ^M.-^.....\u., 46 F L : s H. 1-' . -,i- - -'-*-. XXIX. F L E S H. Lcnni-Lennape. Ojoos. Chippcwas. fVeus, meat. ff^ea/St fVi- jaas. Minfi. " -- • Mahicanni. Wecas, flcfh or meat. Shawnccs. Wiothe. Wiauthce, meat • iVijothi. Pottawatameh. * Miamis. Lananfoi, beef. Meffifaugers. • Kikkapoos. • Piankafhaws. # Algonkins. fFeafs, Oiiiasj meat. Indians of Penobfcot ^ and St. John's. 5 • Acadians, according \ to De T.aet. 3 * Narraganfets, &c. - # ' Senecas. • Mohawks. • Onondagos. Owachra. Cayugaj,. # Oneidas. JVauahloo, meat. Tufcaroras. * Chcerake. ♦ t . Vil - - FLESH. i-' . 'A- ■■- -'-*-. - Mufkohge. - • - Chilcfe. Hon. •' H. Lopari, 58. Otyeh. Semoyads> 124. Odga, Vea/s, m- 126. 71- 75- If 'f J * Oftiaks, ** ■• or meat. Toungoofi, 14a. i thee, meat. XXX. BLOOD. f, Lcnni-Lcnnape. - Moocum. Chippcwas. - Mifquyy Mijkow, Minfi. - Mochcum. Mahicanni. Pucakan. tt meat. Shawnees. Mifqueby Mufqui, Pottawatamch. - Mufquch. Miamis. • Mcflifaugcrs. - • Kikkapoos. • Piankafhaws. - • Algonkins. Mifcouey Mijkoo. Indians of Penobfcot ^ * and St. John's. 5 at Acadiansj according ;to> # al( De Lact. - Narraganfets, &c. ♦ « Sankikani. Mohoiht. tit I- ^rV'i'-'-4'^^*-*^'--''^-'"-''---^ i* ■-■- .„.-,-.L .• y ^.^ A^.'. ..u-.>^ .-.^i..,^ ■ -I'r A" ''T i f *''-| i f ■-■•-'^"-'^ - rt r- -^ i - i ^ rt fin- f i tl r^ I I win I -* tiHiV*^'^ ""- i "^"^ i- a*.-^'- ■'>«>^ B h O Q D, Senecu. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Ooeidas. Tufcaroras. Cochnewagoes. Wyandots. Naudo«fclfies. Checrake. Muflcohge. Chikkafah. Chokuh. Katahba. Woccons. Natchez. Mexicans. Brafilians. Chilefe. Tartars, Koriaki, Dugorri, • Otquicbfa. « Ingoh. • Kegore ? Chaucauh. • t. Tagul - MoUbueHy Mdihtn. c^7. Ka%an. 154. Moollyomool, 80. Toog. XXXI. HEART. I^enni-Lennape. Chippewas. JVdee. Kttey thy heart. Oathty^ MUhewab. '^Ivitt. RT. , thy heart. Ichewab. *»>..,. 7 IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. mmmmmmm CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques ■^.„. r E^«liii^^1!SiifeimimKi Ml _.«-A^ im .rt v ^ f m* f !' v^ ' ^^.\ r ^.. '* l-' ' . ' ^ Wf' - ' HEAR T. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnccs. " * Pottawatameh. Miamis. Meflifaugers. Kikkapoos. Piankafhaws. Algonkins. ■^ Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's. Acadians, according to De Laet. Narraganfets, &c. Senecas. • . Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochncwagoes. Wyandots. Naudowefllcs. Chcerake. Mufkohgc. Chikkafah, Choktah. Katahba. Natchez. Utoh, JVtcu, his heart. Oteehe? Otahehi\A^\it^xt, Entahhee. * Micheoue. F/uttahs * Aweriachfa. aga. H I m } \ vs'Ufw^f'^^^- '^^-' vV'"' so Mexicans. HEART. Tollochtli. Taweeguini, - 131. Keeet. Kamaftfhini, - 132. Mit. Toungoofi,i39,i4i,i43. Mewan. ' - 142. Mewane. Lamiui, - 145. Mewon. XXXII. LOVE. Lenni-Lennape. Chippewas. ' Onondagos. *«'*^>i'*.. Naudowcflies. Mexicans. Ahoaltoivoagan. Saukie. Zdrgay, or Zar- geytoon, ' love, to love.' Nejonrochqua. Ehwahmeah. Tlazotlaliztli. •i«»4 ••«»'<•.< 5:»">"»~>"»" Offctintzi, 79. Ooarzen, Warge, XXXIII. LIFE. Lenni-Lennape. Chippewas. Minfi. Mahicanni. NoocbmmoWf Nouchitno - win. # Pummaoofowonkan. , „ *. .*- ' «"».«r-^--*''<*^"'"T'" LIFE. E. an. gay, or Zar- ovcjtolove.' t. "Ti^to I: arge. s» Shawnces. - fVabatiJec. Pottawatameh. * Miamis. » Algonkins. Nouchimoiiin. Onondagos. lagonhechfera. XXXIV. DEATH. Lenni-Lennapc, Chippcwas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. Miamis. Algonkins, Onondagos, Neepoo, dead. * Nup, I die. Nip, *to die, 1 die." Nippigee. Nip, 'to dip, Idie." Nepua, dead,. Neepoo, Nipouin, dead. lawohejs, * XXXV. COLD, E. Lenni-Lennape. Theu. TaUf cold weather. 1 Chippewas. Geejfemar. , NouchimO' Shawnces. IVeppee, JVepi. Miamis. Neepanwayhirckee, Algonkins. Kekatch. Kikatch, < cold. wonkan. I am cold.' m i:, ^lt Mj* » M 'm-' ri M l fe iaOWtJ i a* Onondagos. Otohri. Brafilians. Roig. .4^.-»->- Lefghis, 50^52.53- Rohee. ' XXXVI. SUN. Lenni-Lennape. Gifchuch. Chippewas. Kefis, Kiffis, Kifchis, Gee- fejfey. ■ Minfi. Quifhough. Mahicanni. Keefogh. Shawnees. Kcfaughfwoh, Ki/chach-' thwab, Kifathwa. Pottawatamch. Kefis. Miamis. Kilfwoa, Keelfoi. Meflifaugers. » Kikkapoos. Kijhefsua. Piankafhaws. * Algonkins. Kifisy Keefts. Indians of Penobfcot 7 and St. John's. 5 Keezooje. Acadians, according to 7 ^;. . De Laet. - J ^'^'''^' Narraganfets, &c. Nifpawus^ Keefuckquand, Indians of New-Eng-" land, according to^ Kefus, *■ Purchas. ^} SUN. N. ', Kifchisy Gee- oh, Kifchach-' Kifathwa. ieelfoi. s. Kee/uckquand, New-England- Indians, 7 Gorges. [ , : " ■ ■ ,r, ■ - Cone^;. accord jng to A Senccas. - Gachquau, Mohawks. - * Onondagos. - Garachqua. Cayugas. - • Oneidas - Efcaltey. '- Tufcaroras. - Heita. Cochnewagocs. * Wyandots. • — Yandcfah, Naudoweffies, Paahtah. Chcerake. - Eus.seA-nan-to-g€yAnantoge. Muflcohge. - NeettaUuJhy Hafhfth. Chikkafah. - • Hafce, Hafche. Choktah. - Hafce. Katahba. T • Woccons. rf Wittapare. Natchez. r Qua- chill. Mexicans. - Tonaiiub. Poconchi. m * Darien-Indians. r Caraibcs. - K^chi, Huyeyou. Jaioi, in Guaiana. Weyo. Arwaccas, in Guaiana. Adaly, Shcbaioi, in Guaianjj. JVecoelije. ^rafilians. - Coaraci. Peruvians. Inti. Chilcfe. - Ante. t This word I quote from memory j but the fpelling may bf depended upon. c i % 54 Chcremifli, Votiaki, Vogoulitchi, SUN. 63. Ket/cbe, Keet/cb, 6^. Schoondi. - 66. KojUl. 67. Cho/al. 68. Kotaly Kotol. 69. ChodaL 70. C&«/, Naeey Talkoo, 71. Cj&o», Kooaijch, - 93. Goo». 94, 98. iCo(?«. f the Co- 7 „ 175.5''"" 152. Heecbem. 183. Mata-Haree, 184. Mataree. Oftiaks, Tartars, Inhabitants o rea, PumpocoUi, Malays, lavanefc. XXXVII. MOON. Lcnni-Lennape. Chippewas. NipahuniyNipawi Gijchuch. Ddicot, Tebickefis, Gee- X Ktjhufe, in the language of certain Indians of North-Ca- rolina, according to Lawfon : Kepow, in the language of the Indians of Fennfylvania, according to Gabriel Thomas, in the year 1698 : Kitfus, in the language of the New England- Indians, according to Purchas. MOON. cb. Talho, b. 3N. awiGifchuch. ickefis, Gee- of North-Ca- nguage of the I Thomas, in ^evr-£nglan4< Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. Quilhough ? Neepabuck. Tepechki Kifcbacbtbioa, Nipia-Kifathwa, Pottawatameh. Kefis. Miamis. . Keelfoiy Kilfwoa. Mcflifaugers. Kikkapoos. Piankalhaws. Kifhejfu. Algonkins. Indians of Penobfcot and St. John's. \ Dehikat Ikizis, Debikat Ikify. Keezoofe neehaufoo. Acadians, according to 1 De Laet. 5 Knicbkaminatt. Narraganfets, &c. - Nanepaujhatf or Muntian nock. Senccas. Mohawks. Gacbquau. * Onondagos. Garachqua, Cayugas. Oneidas. * • Tufcaroras. Heita. Cochnewagoes. - - Wyandots. - ^ Naudoweflles. ♦ ■ ■ Tefugh. Oweeb. Checrake. Mufkohge. Chikkafah. Neus-Je J-mtJ-to-ge, * NeetlaHufa, Ncethleeh HaMch. Hafchc, Hafcc, i, t''! m V M O Choktah. Katahba. Woccons. Natchez. - • Mexicans. Poconchi. Daricn-Indians. Jaioi, in Guaiana. Arwaccffi, in Guaiana. Shebaioi, in Guaiana. Caraibes. Brafilians. Peruvians. Chilefe. O N* Hafcc. JVittapare, Mtiztli. Nee. Nonmy or Noene. Cattehee. Kyrtryrre. Nonum^ Kati. laci. Cuilla. Tien. «<-<"<-<-^5SJ®J5k»">~>->"»« Karaflini, Tawecguini, Kamaflfliini, Moutori> Arii, Kottowi, Tartars, Lcfghis, Anglo-Saxons, 130. Keefteet, Keejchtait. 131. Keejchteen. 132. Kiee. 134. Keejchtait. 148. Efcbooee. 149. Schooee. 89- ♦ 94. Oee, Aee. 50. MootSy Motjch. 51,52. Moots. - 31. Mona, ithifa;iM-«i««i**ii n i ' «lM*iw'' ''* i M * !> ' **' ••^^^•■••waOT^ . MM - g ^* - I '- ' - ¥ ^ 9* - W- STAR. P XXXVIII. STAR. Lenni-Lennape; Chippewas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnecs. Pottawatameh. Miamis. * A 1 Jlank. AUanquewakt Alankwewaky ftar*. Annunk, Alani. Anockfuk. -^^^^X^ Alaqua. Alaquagii ftars. Anung. Alanqua^* Lanquakee ? AlanquakS,\ ftara. Unaaquok MefllfaugeM. Kikkapoos. iPiankafliaws. Algonkins. Indians of Penobfcot^ Wotlawvofs, ftars. and St. John s. j Acadians, according to ? K^rkooeth. '"^ "' De Laet. 3 Narraganfets, &c. Anockquus. Sankikani. - * Senecas. - - Ogechfoondau, Mohawks. - •• * Onondago:. - OtfchifchtenochquM.\ * Major Mentzcis. f Major Mentzcet. \ The Onondagoi! likewife call a ftar OjiJIeg, as 1 was informed by the late Mr. Rittenhoufc. According to Father Lafitau (Maun dn Saimagn AmriquMU, &c tome II. p. 435 ) the Iroquol* caU the ftars, O0i'f. !'•( i n >a,« Mti4m ni l I - ■ ■■ ■il^ "^^-^f' ■ w S T A R. Cayugas. • .-, , ...,.-.» •■ Oncidas. • Hochelagenfcs. • '■ .■ ' ' . Tufcaroras. Uttewirarat/e. , Erigas. ■ • Cochncwagoes. 1 • Wyandots. • .v," /. Naudoweflies. • Cheerake. • Mufltohge. Kotchdtchumpah. Chikkafah. * - Choktah. • Katahba. # Woccons. Wattapi untakeen Natchez. * Mexicans. Citlabin. Poconchi. * Darien-Indians. - • Jaioi, in Guaiana. Chirika. Caraibes. Otialoukouma. Brafilians. lacitata. Peruvians. Coyllur. Chilefe. Wangelen, ftars. -«-*•«■■< ••■'®@®@»^ *■*'*•■ Kottowi, 149. Alagdn. Affani, 150 Aldk. Kamtfchadals, 158 , Agageen. WMnHirfJMIi^wMwy^'irf 11- ■■<«»■ ■ -f U j ipi ■ <;, 1 ! ?■ '■ ■ '^'i—^i^ ■ ■-■■ lit umpah. ttakeer. na. ftars. STAR. Mordva. Votiaki, Semoyado, Taweeguini, - Mogul-Tartars, - Toungoofi, 138, Lamuti, Chapogirr Japaneefe, Altekefeck, - Kieft. * 65. Keezeelee^ Kezek 126. Kijfeenga, 127. Ki/cbeka, 128. Ki/fangka. 129. Keefeheka, 131. Keefchka. 135. Ot/o, Oiofl. 139. Ofcheekta. 140. Ofcheekta. 141. Ofcheekta, Ootamookta. 144. Otfchakat. 145. Otfcheekat. 146. Odfcheekta. 161. Phofchee. t 111. PTfl^o, FTfl^ooo. 112. Wagooa. XXXIX, RAIN. Lenni-Lennape. Chippewas. Sokelaan, it rains. Ife Kimmewan, Kimmewon, Kimmeewan. * • I infert thi. word on the imhority of the learned Strahlenberg. t i..;.*. i. -ntioned « the name oj^a ^^^by Adajr.^, ^^tS af;r b;tTt^UtleLn^fthefoutlKrutrih«^ perhap the Checrake. ■jliiiAi&'JW 9o RAIN. Mahicanni. , -^5 Sookanoun. .f, s* S Shawnees. Kemewane. 1 Kikkapoos. Algonkins. ^ ►. ift V Waptenaan. - ^ ■ Indians of New-Eng-") • ^ land, according to Pur- > Soogoran. ■ chas. 3 1 Onondagos. Ne-jit/htaronti. I Jaioi, in Guaiana. 'f^'^ Kenape, 1 .tit-:- • r- f ^ , -v:. ^. Lefghis, '^liC^ 53. Jf(«w^. -' .«,». ;-.^,. J Imeretians, 4s=v. 109. Tfcheema. « - •"-►--^ -»^ ' Akalhini, 119. KamCy Tfchanee, naTisI Boureti, 136. Kooran. Tchiochonfld, 54. Sag^. ,.,.-:3^|:f«i««|f( XL. SNOW. 1 Xenni-Lennape ,1?*, GwA^. ,; Chippewas. Ahguhn, Going. Minfi. • Ga«, GaA«. Mahicanni. - Pfaune. Shawnees. Weneeh, Coone. Pottawatamch. Guhn. Miranis. Mimtwawy Manatwoa. Kikkapoos. Hokoon. Mohawks. * Kemcwan. 'ontt. ■ ■■%■>.:. ■ W. :■[.■ 2. Coone. ly Manatwoa. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras, Cochnewagoes. Naudoiveflies. Mufkohge. Chikkafah. Choktah. I C E, dl X'-.kT Acaunque, Sinnee. ■'f*5«ii Hittot^-hotkch, " white ice.*" Dktohiah. * -^ * Oktohfah? T'-r XU ICE, Lenni-Lennape. Chippewas. Mahicanni. r Shawnees. Pottawatameb. Onondagos. Mufkohge. Kazee-Koomitfki, 117. Meek. Akalhini, - ii9' Meek Mequdrme. Mooquaumeh. Coone. Mucquam. Oiuijfa. Hittote. <» N. B. Hittote is ice, and hotkeh white. {[''■niirftr' ■■ i."- ^pi'ytK^wii?;' •*■''-: ■w 62 DAY. XLIL DAY. Lenni-Lennape. Gifchgu. Chippewas. Ogunnegat, " "Day, or • days." Shawnees. KiJJiqua. Algonkins. Okonogat, " Day, or * days." XLIII. NIGHT. Lenni-Lennape, Tpoku. Chippewas. Debbikat. Shawnees Tepechke. XLIV. MORNING. Lenni-Lennape. Woapan. Chippewas. Keejayp. Minfi. * Mahicanni. « Shawnees. Wapparuh. Piankafhaws. Wahpunki. ^Zi1Jr''""l'f'nr'-'^- ■ Onondagos. Orhangechtfcbik. liniS-ni m E V . I N G. * "Day, or Day, or T. XLV. EVENING. Lenni-Lennape. Chippewas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. - Onondagos. Oliguitheki. Twaz6dwa, Zajogar^k, XLVI. SUMMER. NG, ik. Lenni-Lennape. Chippewas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnees. Pottawatameh. Miamis. Meffifaugers. Kikkapoos. Rankalhaws. Algonkins, Indians of Penobfcot 7 and St. John's. S Nipen. Menokemegy "Summer or fprmg." Neepun, Nipen. Nipennooy Nepeneh. Echniepen. * Merockaminkt ** Sum- mer or fpring." Nebbooneey Nepotmeeab. ^., h m mmi\ 1 11 JT i fn l life. *&t.. 64 S U M M t R. Narraganfets, &c. • Neepun. '^f'-^ 56:;. •'!_■■** Senecas. ^A , * / • Mbhawks. - '■ • '■J.M. Onouclagos. Gagenhe- \- Cayugas. *' • - * Oneidas. • Tufcaroras. • -\ Cochnewagoes. - . • Wyandots. • ■ Naudoweffies. • Cheerake. Akooea, . Mufkohge. t Chikkafah. Tomepalle* Choktah. Tomepalle. Semoyads, 120. Ta, Tamoma. XLVII. WINTER. Lcnni-Lennape. Chippewas. Minfi. i!^,*ff.^A . Lo%;'an. Pepoun, Bebone. * Adair, firam whom I take thi* word, informs us that PaUt fignifiM " warm or hot." Heat in the language of the Eftlandians, s5^ '* ^"^ law, and P.itlawoct: in the language of the Carelians, ^6, it is PaUvia: in the language of the Albni, Ijo, it is Pala. ■■ y . '-^ ■ ■w-l■T ^ ■ ■* -: ' "i'? |i . *'»''* T''^l '! f ^ - ' ^ - ' * * '* - ^' WINTER. ■.i^aiil. •=::*« ER. one. It Ai//r fignifiea ans, j5. » ''''''■ 6, it is Palavia : «l Mahicanni. Hpoon. Sha-wnees. - Pepoon-Nunkee. Miamis. - • Meffifaugers. • Kikkapoos. ' - • Piankafliaws - ♦ Algonkins. I,' Pepoon, Pipoun. Indians of Penobfcot ' ' and St. John'*. j Beeboonah. Onondagbs. Gochfcbdre^ UchferaL ■■*■* t-^^t^ ^^QQf-*~*->-*- Altekefeck, 112. Ceen, Kiiihazibb^Abif- i»3- Geen. finian^ Akaihini, - 119. Ganee.* XLVIIL EARTH, or LAND. Lenni-Lennipe^ - Chippewas. Hacki t earth, ground, land. Jukwirii earth. * See the American wcwdi for fiiow. f This word occur* in the ounet of fome of our Vallic*, &c. Thu* Tulpkhocking [m we call it] in Lancafter-county, waa called by the J>eh- warea, Tulpcwehacki, which fignifiet the bud of the Tdrtmfe. K ■! »se"-i{fe--*.'ww««wsP*a^--.«: €6 EAfttH, on LAND. jichgi, the earth. Hackkeeh, Hacki. JJiJieg. Aki/kiii. Acke ctt Atikouin^ Minfi. - * Mahicanni. » ' Sha^vnees. Pottawatameh. Miamit. Meififaugers. Kikkapo<3«. « Piankafliaws. Algonkins. Indiahs ot fetibblfcftl > j^ , and St. John's. S Acadians, according to 7 Mezamimo. DeLaet. 5 * Narraganfets, &c. Senecas. Mohawks. Onondagos. - Cayogas. One'idas. Twfcarorafc Cochnewagoes. ^ Wyandotsv Naudoweilies. Checrake. Mufkohge. Chikkafah. Oibkta^. " Katahba. Auke or SanaukamtKAf earth or land. Toeenjagh? * UchttMntfchia* # Ahunga ? * * * ' Ecauiuiai^. # * «T . | i- .,— i. i . Wi H-» |Wl' . H tJ IH JIIL ' L,"" IP' , l "f * D. earth. Hacks, t^uin^ \anaukamtKk, and. na* h. EARTH, OR LAND. Wocconsi - . * Natchez. » » • Mexicans. » . Lan. Poconchi, i >^ftf/,«' earth or ground Darien-Indians. • * Brafilians. , • Ibi. Chilefe. Tue. Peruvians. LaSla. Caraibes. - - - NoHum. Jlikiwvsiu??. Nuna. y> -t^r*-*- Perfians, - 76. Ck4k(f' Curdi, in Curdiftan, 77. C^^oak. Semoyads, 126, 127,128. Tooet/cb. Kittawini, - s<54- ^0. Chechengi, r 114. Lettich, Um, Ingoofhevi, - US- ^^'"» ^^**'- Permiaki, - 60. Ma, M90. Vogoulitchi, - 69* ^^^- •^B*" XLIX. WATER. Lenni-Lennape. Chippewas. Minfi, M*t>l, Beb*. Nebbij NcbUh, MfW*. *Mbi. cert Aul>. of pJSff^Wi^W ^^ ^1*^ yowbNteMBI SfW Virgincoruni. / .^jyi^iiirTiiiMiii ■ "i":-' 68 WATER. Mahicanni. Naticks. - - Shawnees. f Pottawatameh. Nbey. Nippe,. waters*. Ncpee, Nippee, M//>;, Nippfh, Nippa. Nebee. Miamis. - - . Meffifaugers. Kikkapoos. ^ ' Piankafliaws. . * ' Nepec, Neeper. • Napi. Algonkins. jVif^i, NepeCj Mukttman, Indians of Penobfcot > Nippeeg, " waters in ^ and St. John's. 3 general. Acadians, according to > >>, , .. -. ^ DeLaet. j C*tf*tf«a», Or«i/M^. Narraganfets, &c. * Sankikani. Pampticoughs. . r Senecas. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Empye. Umpe. Onecanafe \ Oneegha and Caneega,\ Hohnekah. OchriecanoSf Ochneca. * Awoo. * I quote this word from iponory (but I can dqtcnd upoil tltf acci^ racy of the fpeUing) from Mr. Elljot'i traniUtion of the Bible iaito the language of the Natickt. f Thefe two word* on the authority of Johamies Megapolenfis, a* eaiiy a* i6ji. It will be worthy of the notice of the learnS to inquire ittt» thetaeaatag of the word Onega, which it the name of a lalle in th^ goTcrmnent of Oknctz in Rnflia. I m i ] 1 9m » ™i iiw >" rs*. pee, Nippi^ 'ppa. nni-Lennapef ^ Chippewas, Minfi. r l^ahicanni. r Shawnees. - Pottawatameh. - Miamis, - • Me0ifaguers. • Kikkapoos. - * Piankafliaws. Algonkins. Indians of Pcnobfcot and St. John's. Tendeu, Tindey. Skuddeu, Sk'^t^h, $(gr tay, Squitty. Tendeu, Twendaigh. Stauw, Stauuh. Skutteh, Skutteh, Sc0te, Scutah. ^otaweh, CoQtahwee^ ScuttJ^w*. Scute. - Skute, Scoute. Sqittab^ * Qji the authority of Mr. Andrew Ellicpt. n,. ^i i. 'iiT im I II i ijij» i nn " ■ w-m.t L . ^y^M^ . * />• idey. endaigh. luh. itteh, Sctate, 'oQtahwef^ fff Acadians, according to 7 Sucktouw^ De Laet. 3 V ■ Sankikani. - • Tmteywe. Narraganfcts, &c« ^ Parapticoughs. - # Tinda. Senecas. Mohawks4 « Onondagos. Ogejiaa. Uthfx/ia*y OcheeleU. Otfchifchtay hteckat Cayugas. - * On^idas. - Tufcaroras. - ' # • . Vtcbaf* Cochnevagoes. - Wyandots. Naudo^effies. Cheerake. • • Chceftah. JPaahtah* ' ' . , Cheera, Cheda, thtt* ■lah. Mulkohge. - Chikkalah* - Choktati. Toatca, Toutkah. - Luwock, Loowik> Loak. . AJhy ** the divineftne.*^ Katahba. Woccons. Natchez. Mexicans. • Tau. 1. Qua. TM. Poconchi. . "1 -1 ""- • On the »utlM»rUy of JohaftiKd Mggajw'wfi'' " ""'^ •» '*<^*' . f Adaif. 7« DarienJndians. Jaioi, in Guaiana. Galibis. Caraibes. • Brafilians* - • Peruvians. FIRE. • Ouapoto* . * Onato. Ouattom li Tata, *. -♦•♦M'^ Iri(h (Celts in Ire- land.) Semoyads, 1 6. Toetu, Vogoulitchi , Ofliaks, Perfiansy Turks, Tartars, - ISO' 1 24. 700. - .135. Tooee^ 126. Tiin, . 66. TaoQti 6y. Tat, - 71. 7*00^ 7a. Teogoot. 76. Aatefcby Aatafch* 88. Ody Atefcb. - 89. O0/, 0/* 90. O0/, Ot. 91,92. O0/. - 93»94- Ot. 95. O0/. 96, 97, 98. Ot. 99. 0«^ I i ■rt fa/ch^ r I R E. ^F CKinefe. Choa. * Kottowi, * 149- Chot. Inbaci, - i5i' Bok. Pumpocolli, - 152. Bootfch, LI. WOOD. , Lenni-Lennape. * Tacban. Chippewas. Mittic, Metic. Meteek^ trees or wood. Minfi. Weitcook, a tree. Mahicanni. Metooque, Mahta^ihun. Shawnecs. "* Meh-teh-kde, Ottechqua^ Meticqueh. Pottawatamch. » • * Miamis. Tawwanneet Meffifaugers. » • Kikkapoos. - • # Piankalhaws. * • Algonkins. ■• Mittick, wood for firing. Meteeky trees. Indians of Penobfcot ? and St. John's. 5 * ' - Acadians, according to 7 De Laet. 5 Kemotuh yMakia* * On the authority of Mr. Bell. m I 11 1*' i! i ' I • f4 WOOD. Narraganfets, &c. -• f Sankikani. Hitteocke. Pampticoughs. . ♦ Senecas. Cemdaugb? Mohawks, * Onondagos. - ' * Garonta. Cayugas. , * -„<.? Oneidas. - * • Tufcaroras. Ouyunkgue, Erigas. • Cochnewagoes. - * Wyandots. « Naudoweffies. Ochaw, tree. Checrake. Attah, Attoh. Mu&ohge. Etoh, Eto, a tree. Chikkafah. - Ette. Choktah. * Conchacs. # Mobilient. # Katahba. * Woccons. Tonne. Natchez. # Mexicans. ^mhuitl, a tree. Poconchi. # Daricn-Indians. - * Jaioi, in Guaiana. Weive, Veiie, a tree Arwaccae, in Guaiana. Hada, a tree. Shebaioi, in Guaiana. Ataly, a tree. ..(■i.iif f i g i .t ir'^ B gt g ' ^g- '** ;gy ^ mif j i W H « "» 1 I p n 'i ' P^ - ^ " ■ W f'i".-f ' | ? ■ jB Tt ' b? u. tree. Attoh. Ito, a tree. /, a tree. Veiiey a tree. \ tree, i tree. Galibis. Caraibes. Brafilians. Peruvians. Chilcfe. Pcfferais. Kartalini, Scmoyads, Eftlandians, Koriaki, Tartars, WOOD. 7i '*i:5S.'*o3:>f ^«^ '''^^> * tree ifi l^-jiJl Huehu'e'y a tree. • .i>JiJl /^a, a tree. ..i^JiikVaTa :iklU'J Jbquemf a tree, Maviel, wood. « - io8. Tliy Tcbe TmkL lis. Meede^ Madgee. 1 27. Matjcbe. 55. Met/a. 153. Oof too. 97. O/oo^, a tree :w*;(i-*^' LII. Lenni-Lennape. Minfi. Mahicanni. Acadians. Miamis. Indians of Virginia. L a LEAF. Wunipak. Wunipachquall, " leaves." Combacb- qually " leaves of a tree." Wanipacbqudlly leaves. Wauneepockq, Wau- nepockq. Nibir. Mifhfheepauquau. Attafskujsy " leaves, weeds, or grafs" (captain smith). -■Ilit II ittlii» liH'i »■ » ■■ *■ " i*f f'jT;i tt**^«^fg' ■| i ];^J|l» i il l ■ i J,iHHHl i| l."J ' W.i ii "- 76 ' L E A F. ^- ■* . Mufkohgc. - Ectoo-iicffee. Kacahba. ■♦ Ecapauh^ Brafilians. Ceba. ChUefc. Tapel. Curdi, - 77- Pak. Scmoyads, - 120. Wiba. Wibe. ^9^ Dewf, T/cbabe. Xfchaba. Tfcbab. Karaffini, - 130. Aflyrians, - 87. Tarpee. LIII. MOUNTAIN. Lcnni-Lennape. H^acbtjchuy Wauchchoo. Wacbtjcbuwall, moun- tains. Minfi. Weighchunk. Mahicanni. Whauchoo. Naticks. JVadcbu. Wadcbuafi), mountains. Miatnis. Atchcewee. Shawnces. - Miffivoagewee. Acadians. Pamdemour, Senecas. Onondes. I ii i i i. ii nH i ui i iin§0. \ mmj n ' um. a ll iJM ii w i wij i 1 1)111. i ;a i w* MOUNTAIN. 77 Yet. Mohawks. Omndoghharage, Onondagos. Onontes. - '* Cayugas. Kamatauta. Oneidas. Tonoondaughhalay Yoo- noontadcnooh. Tufcaroras. Yooneneeuntec. Cochnewagocs. - YoonoonteCjYenoontch. Wyandots. Onontah. Notiyooh ? i . Naudoweflies. ♦ Checrakc. Ottare, "mountainous." Mulkohge. Thlannechulweeh. Chikkafah. Uncb^a, Choktah. Uncboba. Katahba. Suck, Taro. * Woccons. - AIN. Natchez. Mexicans. • ^auhtla. (a.Wauchchoo. Poconchi. - fchuwall, moun- Darien-Indians. Galibis. Ouiboui. hunk. too. Caraibcs. . Ouebo. Brafilians, IbiHra. Tbneture, ipoun- • tains. Wadcbuafbt * • Peruvians. itainSi Chilefe. J^ahuida. ivee. M gewee. Pcffcr,ais. - - ~ our. ^ c Mordva, - 61 . Pando. 9« Mokftian, - 6? . Panda, fVanda, r u J 1! I' I iM I tiiliiljl i'ill)lii'«IW*i>95- Taoo. Katntchadals, 159. Enfcbeeda. Scmoyads, 121. Saooky a hill. Chaldeans, 83. Teeroo. Syrians, 84. Tooro. Aflyrians, 87. T6eera.-\ LIV. HILL. Lenni-Lcnnapc. Wachtjchuwiy Wacht/chu^ wigeuy hilly. Mahicanni. - Poohkaiyaak. Miatnis. EefpauttcnkJ. Senecas. - Onondcs ? \ The affinity between the(e words and the Brafilian words, Jbitira and Ybmture, muft appear very ftriking, efpecially when it is confidered that Ibi is the Brafilian name for the earth. X Some of the North- American tribes call the AUeghenCy- mouKtains, Pamotinck, I lu imif w uw i . i m ■ ' w-. i H 'y g II I L L. :re. Onnan-Oihoor, w. w. ill. L. wi, Wacbtfchur. hilly, raak. :nkj, Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oncidas. Tufcaroras. Wyandots. NaudoweHTies. Cheerake. Mulkohge. Chikkafah. Choktah. Katahba. Woccons. Natdhez. Mexicans. - Galibis. Caraibes. Brafilians. Peruvians. Chilefc. Omndoghharage. OnontHy Imontcu Yoonuntch. Onontah ? * Nanne. Eecunhulweeh. Nanne. Nanne, Nanneechauha. Sook-Taro. Tepetl, Tepee. Cajfali. Ouebo. « * Iluincul. M"V-.M-Hj§8©;;:SJSv»">-»-»- lie Brafilian words, riking, efpecially ian nvne for the dl the Allegheny/- Kouriltzi, 162. Onnan-Othoor. Scmoyads, - 121. Saook. Tartars, 92. Tepe. Turks, 88. Tepey Depe. Perfians, 76. Tel. Curdi, - 77- Tel. Hlj.^,^^ l:^.-:.... „»^^--. 8o HILL. Chaldeans, 83- Teeho. Tartars, 95- Kafch. Kalmuks, 137. ScbeeUe, LV. RIVER. Lenni-Lenn&pe. > SipOt Sipu, Seepoo, Mahicanni. •m T'fcpoo, Sepoo. Chippcwas. - Sippim, Sibit Scpec. Pottawatameh. - Secbcc. Shawnces. - Thepcc, Thipi. Miamis. - Secpccwec, Sibiwai. Senccas. T Kenondeagb ? Mohawks. - Kaighhooghhaddaddeagh, Qnondagos. - »' Geihdte, Geihuhataiie. Cayugas. Kigkbautautta. Oneidas. f Kaihhoonhadadec,iiri|/&- hoonbautaute. Tufcaroras. - Keenah, Keenen. Cochnewagocs. - Kahunhatatch ? Wyandots. - Yandxnkkeh, Yan# daunkeeah, Naudowcffies. - • Cheerake. T Amtnoi. Muflcohge. - Hotcheh, Hatcba. Chikkafah. - - Okhcnnah. Okauw, water. i , l Ul |j| | ll . . I WH » ..) "IRHI'.vt* RIVER. 8i R. u, Seepoo, Sepoo. ibit Sepec. Thipi. :c, Sibiwai. 'hf- bbaddaddeagh. Geihuhatatif. lutta. ihadadee,Jri|/&- itaute, Keenen. cateh ? kch, Yan* :eah, , Hatcha. ih. Okauw, Choktah. - Katahba. Woccons. Natchez. - Mexicans. G alibis. Cara'ibes. Brafilians. - Peruvians. •Chilefc. Tartars, Oakhenah, " the wa- tery path." Efwoa, E-fwo-a. Atoyatl. Jpoliri, Eicourou. Tona. Pelu, Mayn. Leve. iSHSStS^fy-^ >->►>"»« 92,98. Soo. 97. Soog. Kabardinian Tchcrkef- fi, - III. Ps'i- Kamtchadals, - 159- ^''^^^ Ofetti, - 79- -D^"- Toungoofi, - 144- -^f^'^^' Lamuti, - HS- ^kat. Japancfe. - - ^'»«"» (thunberc). LVI. DOG. Lenni-Lennapc. MeecanneUy Mekannet ' Jllum,A\\oomtMoc- kanneh. il^^ iijt il^ 'I m ""•■W- w Chippewas. DOG. 1 Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnccs. Pottawacamch. Miamis. Meffifaugcrs. Naticks. Algonkins. Indians of Pcnobfcot? and St. John's. 3 Indians of New-Eng- land. Narraganfets, &c. Senecas. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochncwagocs. Wyandots. Naudoweflics. - Cheerake. Jlim. Alemon, a little dog. Mum, Allam. Di.ioo, Decaooh. IViJfty Weefeh. Lamah, Aullamo. Nanne-moofh. Anum. Alim. Allomoofe. Aumm (wood). Anutnt Jyim, Arum, Alum. Cheeaah. Abgdrijoo^. r/cbierha. Sowaus, Sowaus. Erhar, Alchaul, Cheetb, Chcetht. Erhar. Neeanooh. Shungujh^. Keera, Keethlab. f On the authority of Johannes Megapolenfis, as early as 1651. X Chovga, a dog or wolf, according to Father Hennepin. 'mon, a Httk lorn. caooh. efeh. ullamo. ofh. ood). owaus. ehaul, leethc. rfblab. , as early as 165 1. er Hennepin. DOG. 83 Mufkohge. Chikkafah. Choktah. Katahba. Woccons. Natchez. Mexicans. Poconchi. Daricn-Indians. Jaioi, in Guaiana. Galibis. Brafilians. Peruvians. ChUefc. Effa, Efa, Ecfa. Ocphe, Ophc. Ophe. Tauntfce, Taunfce. Tauhhe. Chichi. TJi. * Pero. Pero. • * Tevoa. }t Semoyads, - lio- Kanangt Kokam, ..I,...-.— . - 127. Kanak. ____ - 128. Kanak, Kenak. _.,«_■— - 139. Kanak. 1 30. Kannak. III. Chha. 54. Koeera. - 55. Kooer. 56. Koeera, 57. Koeeroo. Karaffint, Tcherkefli, T'-Hiochonlki, . Eftlandiansj Carelians, 01onetzi> + Thefe have, moft probably, been adopted from the Spanifli, Pirre. _ _ M \\* ■*M«ta 84 DOG. Oftiaks, - - 75. Konaik. Pcrfuns, - 76. Kookoor, Saig, Sak, Sekee. Curdi, - - 77. Sekeet Zaee. Siamcfc. - - r/o, Tsjoo, Tgio (,KAur- fer). Pumpocolli, - 152. Tzee. Tangutani, - 165. Tfchee. Akafliini, - H9- ^^«^- LVII. BIRD. Lcnni-Lcnnapc. - T/cbokHs. TJcbclmfM, birds. Minfi. Auwehelles. Mahicanni. Tfchitfis. Miamis. Aaweffinfah. Onondagos. - TJcUigaches. Muflcohge. Epb«us-\. Katahba. • Poconchi. Tj/tquin. M«4>4 •W;S8SSfiSS&-»-»-»-»- Tchiochonlki, ■ 54. Leendgo. Eftlandians, - - 55- I^'^^' Carclians, 56. Leendoo. Chaldeans, - - 83. Oeephoo. t On the authority of Mr. William Bartram FISH. 85 Saigt Sakt tee. , Tgio (KiSwr LVIII. FISH. w -o ■* Lenni-Lennape. Mahicanni. Naticks. 1 Narraganfcts, &c. Chippcwas. *V^k Algonkins. D. Indians of Virginia TJcbclmfa(t Senecas. Us. Mohawks. s. Onondagos. nfah* Cayugas. hes. Oneidas. • Tufcaroras. - Cochnewagocs. - Wyandots. Naudoweffies. ►•>- Cheerake. • Muikohge. r! Chikkafah. • Choktah. • Katahba. - iam Bartram Namees. Namafc, Namafs. Namobsj Namohfoh. Na^ mohftfgf fiflies. Namaus. Kegonce, Kickta. KikoftSt Kickons. Noughmafs (captain smith). Kc-in-joh. Kenjeebogough ? Otfcbienta. Ojountau. Kunjoon. Kantfchccah, Ktinjunb ? Kancheeunk. Eetfoo. Nanneb. Nameb, I I 96 FISH. Woccons. - f N.uchcz. - • Mexicans. - • Poconchi. - - Car. Galibis. - Oto. Curaibcs. - m " Jutbe. Brafilians. - Pird. Peruvians. . - Challua. Chilcfc. / Challua. Pcrfians, - - 76. Maibect Mahee^ Maa- tjchte. Curdi, 77. Mazee, Maaget. Bucharians, - 102. Mahee, Mate. Malays, 183. Eekofiy Eekan. Chaldeans, - 83. Neenoo, Syrians, - - 84. Noono. Tooflietti, 116. T/charey Tfchar. Scmoyads, 123. Karre. 124. 120. Cbarre, Cbalyeh. Chale. 111. AAA* Chalitai. ^ AAA* 125. 1 16. Kole, " KoUe. KoibuMJ. " 1 AV* 133- CboUa. Vogoulitchi, 69. Chool Oftiaks, - - 70. Cbool. Mavwe^WM ^ '-t ■<"" '" BREAD. «7 LIX. B R E A D. |^nni-L«nnapc. Minfi. Mahicanni. 1 Chippewas. Mahee, Maa- Narraganfcts, &c. Meflifaugers. r taaget. Shawnees. Uee. kan. Senccas. Mohawks. . Cochncwagocs. Jcbar. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. ' J^hpoan, Auchpoan, Panef. Lochkhammen, " flour of grain." Tauquauh, Pummch. Paboujhigatiy S^etuhgan. Puttookancak. Bccquauflckun. Tuckhaan, Tuckban, Taumi. f - Mnadra, Cat^draX. Kanataiilook. lochardcbqua. * Kanautoulook. Ootocfiarey Otaunarch. + Pane. See Voctbularium Baibaro-Virgineorum.— It is unneceffary to point out the affinity between feme of thf fe American words and the words for bread in the Latin lan- guage ; and in the Italian, SpaniJh. and other modern lan- guages of Europe. J On the authority of Johannes Megapolen«:. I II m Pi ^ 18 BREAD. Wyandots. Datahrah. Naudowcflics. « Chcerakc. Kawtoo. Mufkohgc. TuckdiguSy Tucka, Chikkafah. * Choktah. • Katahba. Kooftauh. Woecons. Ikettau. Natchez. * Mexicans. - • Poconchi. Viic. Nuviic, my bread. Darien-Indians. * Galibis. Meiou, Ereha, Chilcfc. Methertf flour or meal. --»- Tartars, p4>92>99: Jfcb, Curdi, - 77- Pan, Nan., Hebrews, - 8i. Lechm. Chaldeans, - 83. Lachmoo. Lingua Andicaf, 1 1 8 . Tchan, Can. Boureti, - 136- Ootoom'ik. Yakouti, - 106. Katanach, PumpoLoUi, - 152. Koeeta. f Thu language is fpokea on Mount-Caucafus. uMin i n». "»-»~ 1 Armenians, - 107. OJkor, Wojker^ Wojkow. Bucharians, - 102. Ooftoogan. Japanefe. Fone (thunberg). Kourikzi, - 164. Pone. Carelians, - 56. Loo-00. Olonetzi, - - 57. Loo. Tchcrcmiffi, - 63. Loo. Vogoulitchi, - 69. Oftiaks, - 70- Kartalini, - 108. Loo. L60-00y Too. TJooaUe. LXI. HORN. 1 Lenni-Lennape. Shoommoo, WJchummo. Mahicanni. * Miamis. Weewcclauh. Onondagos. Onagara. Peruvians. Huacra. Arabians, - 85. Soommyeh. Japanefe. TJunno (thunbirg). •er, IVoJkoor. nberg). 0. N. », ffjchummt. jh. hunberg). LXII. HOUSE. Lcnni-Lennapc. . mk, JViqtmmy Wec- quaum. Minfi, Wichquam. Mahicanni. Weequaum. Chippcwas. - mg-'^auwy Wickwaum. A » Miamis. Weekamech. Shawnces. Wiggcwoam. Indians of Virginia. Tebawkans, " houfes" (captain smith;. Senecas. Kanoghjhoe ? Mohawks, Kanoughfagough. Onondagos. Ganochjdje. Cayugas. - Kamooughfote f Oneidas. Kaunoughfau ? Tufcaroras. Yakkench, Tahkemen. Cochnewagocs. - Kanunchfotcch. Wyandots. - Yainohcheah. Naudoweflics. Teebee. Chccrakc. * Muflcohge. Chocoh, Choco. Chikkafah. Chookka. Choktah. - - Chinch -quoa? Katahba. Sook. Woccons. Ouke. Natchez. - * Mexicans. Calli. N M' ilD b) \ w i l ll m.l|J,Lj WWI^P- 1 It HOUSE. Poconchi. - Pat, Ocboch. Daricn-Indians. • Galibis. Amoigna, Soura, Caraibcs. Toubana^ Touhonoko. Brafilians. - Taue viri auh. Peruvians. Huaci, Chilcfc. Puca. -<'*-*-^i'Sl^'^^>->'>->->' Japanefe, - i6i. Chookootjcho, \ Lingua Andica, ii8. Akko. Vogoulitchi, - 67. Koella. fifl Kooal, Kcl. ^n 09. Kartalini, - 108. Sachlee. LXIII. A I R. Lcnni-Lcnnapc. Awontiy fog. Miamis. Awaunweeh, air or fog. Cayugas. Kauweooniafa. Oneidas. Odawalau, Tufcaroras. Hohnauts. Mulkohgc. Hoot-tallcc. Brafilians. Ara, Arre. «4-«>..K->- Kirghiftzi, - 104. Awa. Arabians, - 85. Awa^ Hewa. f Ken, houfes, according to Kxmpfer. 1 t }mi jiyjij i J ! I'l l ,"'"?" ' ! i> .» T> if niyy;yyw»wwii^w A I R. %i h. rouhonoko. tub. "•t I. :h, air or fog. 9/a. ;c. Chaldeans, - 83. Aweerot, Armenians, - 107. Hot, Ot, Yakouti, - 106. lyel. LXIV. LIGHT. Lenni-Lcnnapc. fFoachejeek. Mahicanni, Waunfacck. Naticks. Wequai. Shawnces. JVoththea. Natchez. Oua-chi/l, the fun. Chilcfe. P^/o».^/^, light of the moon. -4..-»- PumpocoUi, - 152- Cb0k. Kartalini, - 108. Natelee. LXV. WHITE. Lenni-Lennape. Woapfu. Minfi. Opeh. Mahicanni. Waupaacck, Waun- payooh. Naticks. fVampagy IVompi. Narraganfets, &c. JVompi. Chippcwas. - Waube. Shawnecs. - Opcc. Miamis. Waupcekce. Pampticoughs. Wop-pjbaumojh. I t Jjg^U I . I j pw 94 WHITE. Pottawatatnch. > Waabflcifll. Senecas. - - * Mohawks. - • Onondagos. - Ne-orhejta, Orbejiocu. Cayugas. - • Oneidas. « Owillkc. Tufcaroras. - fVare-occa, Hoowhau rcakcc. Cochnewagoes. - Kaurakau. Wyandots. - • Naudowc flics. - • Cheerake. - • Mulkohge. ^ Hotkceh, Hutca. Chikkafah. - - To-be ? Choktah. - To-be. Katahba. - * Woccons. - - Waurrawpa. Natchez. - « Mexicans. - •M Iztac. Caraibes. - Alouti, Brafilians. - Tinga. Chilefc. - Lye, -*-*-<-«-^s«s.s$5s:»-»->"»->- Votiaki, 6s. Todee. Tartars, 89—99. Ak. 96. Akak ./IKUK* Mokfhan, 62. Akjcha, Kangatfi, 100. Ak._ Teleouti, lOI. Ak. Armenians, 107. iiupeetak, Speetak, Scmoyads, - 126. Taigee. 1 1 |(fctiii,i^a(^ iiiii 1 1.' * I -gf 1*' ' •VIBHCMiHHi^PV BLACK. . H Orbejiocu. , Hoowhau- LXVI. BLACK. Hulca. )a. Speelak. Lcnni-Lcnnape. Minfi. Mahicanni. Naticks. Narraganfcts, &c. Chippewas. Shawnecs. Pottawatatneh. Miamis. Pampticoughs. Scnecas. Mohawks. Onondagos. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochncwagocs. Wyandots. Naudowcflies. Chcerakc. Mulkohge. Chikkafah. Choktah. Kaiahba. Suckeu. Suckke. N'fikkayooh. Moot. Mowi, Sucki. Kuttawaak, Markaute. Mukkooce. Sicklbh. Mackkautcwcckcch. Mow-cottowojh, Ach/ontacu ? Kauhunchchce, Caw- bunjhe. Kauhoontfchce. Che-cs-tah-ch. ♦ * Luftech Lufteftee. ^ Loofah. rM' «««f«^ipBi^ 96 BLACK. Woccons. m w Tab-teftea. Natchez. - • Mexicans. - Tliltic. Galibis. - Tibourou. Caraibes. - Ouliti. Brafilians. - Son. Peruvians. - •' Chilefe. ■> Curt. -«"«-<-<-<)ssss8s:»-»->*^'»- Semoyads 126. Saga. 127. T/age. 128. Siaige. - 129. Sage. Tartars, 89 — 99. Kara. Kangatfi, 100. Kara. Bucharians, 102. Cbara. Kirghiftzi, - 104. Kara. Yakouti, 106. Chara, LXVII. I (E GO). Lcnni-Lennape. Chippcwas. Minfi. - M, Nee. Nin aigbter, " I myfclf, or alone." Nin, nee, or nee nee, «* I, me, my." Ni. 1 mmfgm O). «' I myfclf, Nifii nee, or me, my." 1(E G O). Mahicanni. Neah, Neab^ Neeah. Naticks. Neg. Shawnces. Nclah, l^eiah, Potrawatamch. Nccnah. Miamis. Nee, Neelah, Neelah. Mcflifatigcrs. Nindoh. PiankaJhaws. Nila. Algonkins. * Indians of Penobfcot? Neeah, and St. John's. 3 • Narraganfcts, Sec. Ner. Senecas. Ee. Mohawks. Eeh. Onondagos. AjuaSy I. Cayugas. rk Oncidas. « Caneftogas. * Tufcaroras. Ee, Ee, Yec. Cochnewagocs. Ele-ee. Wyandots. Dee, Dcch. Naudowcflfies. Meohy " I, or mc." Checrake. Anowah. Mulkohge. Aneh, Aneeh. Chikkafah. • Choktah. Inno. Katihba. Derah. Woccons. * Natchez. • Mexicans. Nehuatl. fl m it ii 1 ^mfimr-^^m^mmrr^mm H Wi I " 9S I (E G O). Poconchi. - /»• Galibis, in G'.iaiana. - ^ou. Caraibcs. - * Brafilians. - - 2'xe, Che, Peruvians. - * Chilcfc. - - • -,M"i"4-*S^S5{5S3S'?-»- *">^>- Motouri, Tangutani, Lefghis, Tchiochonfki, Pcrmiaki, Jews, Chaldeans, - Syrians, Arabians, Aflyrians, Hungarians, 134. Ne. 165. Nat. 53. pee. 54. Mia. 60. Mee. Me. 82. jinee. - 83. ^mo. 84. J^ftO. 85. Ene. Oena, /^na, 87. yi»a. ■ 47. Een. LXVIII. THOU. Lenni-Lennape. Chippcwas. Minfi. Mahicanni. Ki. • » Kecah, Keab. 1 THOU. «>■ Natlcks. Ken. t Shawnces. Kelab, \ Pottawatameh. • Miatnis. Kila, Kcclah. Mcffifaugers. - • Piankalhaws. Kila. Indians of PcnobfcotV and St. John's. Kteah, MlkWyt^rtf • Narraganfets, &c. • Senecas. Ees. Mohawks. Hifs. Onondagos. « Cayugas. Ee^iT Oneidas. • Caneftogas. • Tufcaroras. Eets. • Cochnewagoes. - Eeffcc, Ecf-fcc. Wyandots. Sah, Sauh. Naudoweffies. Chee. Chcerake. • Muflcohgc. Ch6mech. Ecf-faw, he or ftic. Chikkafah. IJbna. Choktah. Ilhno. Katahba. • Woccons. • \ Natchez. • ^ r.r I •%l o I ^ihMirwyrilf.'rtiqi^iVi' 1. I L WIIW — -^ lOO THOU. i ■ Mexicans. - - Tfhuatl. Poconchi. . /fly you or thou. Galibis. jfmre, Amolo, Amoro. Caraibes. 1 • Brafilians. Ende. Peruvians. m • Chilefc. - Eimi. t M-4"*^S!!S5SSSSf»-*-»-»-*" Imcretians, 109. See. Suanetti, 110. See. Mandfhuri, 163. See. Lamuti, 145- Sai. Oftiaks, - 75- Te. Perfians, 76. Too. Curdi, - 77. Too. Inguflicvtzi, - 115. Ho. Toofchctti, . 116. Ho. Hebrews, 81. Atta. Jews, 82. Atoo. Chaldeans, - «3. Ad. Syrians, 84. Anaty At. Arabians, 85. Andyeh. LXIX. THERE. • Lenni-Lennapc. * Icka, r<»///, Neetallec. Chippcwas. - fVoity, or Awoity, lV»t Jaudehi. '''^\ ■r.^S'MAiMii^iWsm^^ci THERE. lOt r thou. nolo^ Amoro. R E. r/;, Ncctallcc. >r Awoity, If^«t' i. 1 Minfi. Mahicanni. Shawnecs. Naudowcflies. Muflcohge. lelak, Nilak. • Alico wefcfji. Dachh Eeflaw. ^^.4^-4 |«^ ii>li| Kartalini, Toungoofi) Lamuti, Yukaghiri, Lefghis, Kituwini, 108. Eeka, Etk, 139. Talai. 145. Tola. 147. Talaet. 50. Daba. 164. Na-lei. LXX. N O. Lcnni-Lcnnape. Minfi. Mahicanni. - Matifty Attay Tagu. Mack'a. Efchta, Afchta, Schtab Qnortdagos. Jdchte. ,i..4M-4-.:SSS5S55S>->-»-»">" Eftlandiansi, Lamuti, Afgani, - 55. Meette. 145. Attjcba. 78. Nee/chta. m I' '41 • ■^^;mm^'^'^j''^^ ' ^i.* ' --'^^* ■•?:'«;i' Additions to fome of the preceding ar- ticles in the Vocabularies,* FATHER. I Katahba. NenedaH. Kabardinian TcherkelH, in. I^Mfa. Tchechentzi, - 114. Da, Ingufhetvzi, - 115. Da. MOTHER. Katahba. Checheendau. Kartalini, Imeretians, 108. Dtda. 109. Dttda. BROTHER. Senecas. Mohawks. Oneidas. Cheerake. Hoghgtt ? Teototeken. Ta-aga'tatu-no-t/a-fy, (mr. »ar- RISH.) Laktfchee. Cannaulah, brother, and friend. * In i/ew inftancet, I have thought it proper to introduce fone of the Afiatic and American wordi, which have already been taken notice of in the preceding articles, into thefe additions. Wherever tbii i» the cafe, I have pointed out new affinities between the words. B R O T H E R. 103 ireceding ar- aries,* R. R. dau. E R. Teototeken. ■W'HO-da-Iy, (mr. »ar- ', brother, and friend. ' to introduce fone of -eady been taken notice . Wherever tbii i» the the words. Muflcohge. Chot-chilch-wauh. Choktah. Nockfifti. Katahba. Murraundau ? Galibis. Bamta, Heuaj, Bhu. Chilefe. Ptnu. ^MMM-^S5jS5ffiSS>---»- y '■'' Kabardinian Tcherkeffi, 111. St/che, Stfcha. Altekefick-Abiflintan, 1 1 z. Afcht. Kulhazibb-Abiflinian, 113. T/chte. Toungoofi, - 140. Akktt. Chapogirri, - - 146. Akte. SISTER. Lenni-Lennape. Nochheefmus, my fiftcr. Indians of New-England. 7'ewwoiv (wood). Shawnees. Toiemab. Senecas. Hegee. Mohawks. Ich-ha gua (MR. parrish) Oneidas. Aktfchee. Tufcaroras. Auchtchee, Ka-nee-nooh. Mulkohge. Chauwonwauh. Choktah. Nockfifti-Tike. Mexicans. Tehneltiuh. Jaioi, in Guaiana. Waryee. Chilefe. Lamotn. -..«M-.-^S5S5®S'>"-->-^ Altekefick-Abiflinian, 1 1 2. Acbfcht. Arabians, - - 85. Acht. Ofetti, - - 79- Cho, Echoo. I K it 1 ,1 j i r^i.i i ili ii ijt iii '"[" i , ii i_ti i ij_. i L ii j, » 'ii'"j ! '" " I04 HUSBAND. HUSBAND. Naticki. Wafukib. Shawnees. WtJJigte. Indians of New-England. Tommaujhew (wood). Tufcaroras. Nekets. Muikohge. Chauheh. Chokuh. Nockene. Galibis. Yon. Brafiliani. TtmirtC9. -<..4M-<«ifflSS;jSSS»>-»-^"*"'" Kalmuks. 137. Vetkut. WIFE. Shawnees. Nruiab. Pianka(haw9 i. - tfiwab. Senecas. no, Yeeo, a woman. Tufcaroras. Kateeeuke. Iroquois. SannateUa (lahontan). Cheerake. AtAjab. Akeyeuh, a woman. Maflcohge. Chauhiwauh. Chokuh. Tike. Kauhba. Eeyauh, woman. Braftlians. Tmirtct. ..> ji,i i| jiltl .s "?i>SSf- i m p , i !i i . 'iif 4J r ^e? ' 3. (wood). I T^omui* lahontan). ;yeuh, a womailt >inan. W I F E. :. 105 Toungoofi> . 138. AJthtt. V , 140. 142. 4ffti. Afchtt. • »43- 146. Afihtt, Athti. Chapogirri> Afchtt. V I R GIN. Naticks. . • PiHumpau. Cochnewaeoes. . Kauyeeahuufee. Muikohge. Choktah. Hoaktee-Manneetteh. Tike-Ameetah? -Peruvians. ■ * Nufta. CHILD. Lenni-Le 'nfir _ AmtmtHs, Amecmeiis. - Awaunfees. Naticks. Ptiffu. Miamis. - Apelochfa. Senecas. - Axaah. Mohawks. • Rakfaab. Oneidas. _ Ixhaah. Turcareras. - Kaqtilah, Ecatfah. Cochnewagoci Wyandots. Ixhahaa. Nee-cha-noo-oh. Muikohge. Chikkafah. ■ . ' . Hokofeeh. Poofltoos? Pufikoep. Choktah. - Poo&oos. .*^MvS!SaSSK»-»-^»- Koriaki, . * 155. Ntntekatfiba. Tchouktehi, 157. I^unUhtttt. j io6 MAN. M A N. i-i Minfi. Illinois. Meflifaugers. Indians of New-England. Indians of Virginia. Senecas. . - Mohawks. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochnewagoet. Cheerake. Chokuh. Galibis. Brafilians. Chilefe. Kittawini, Tchouvafhi, Kouriltzi, JapanefCf Ltnno. ///<■«»■ (father HENNEPIN). Linneeh, Smtiup (wood). Nemarough (captain smith). Haujeenoh. A-gint (mi. parrish). Hajeenah. Loonkquee. Ancehhah, Nehah. Raatzin, Oonqueeh. At-feh-ai. Nockene. Ofuiri, Oquili, Oukeli. Jba. WtHlO. 164. Jtin. 64. StIH, 162. Attnot, ■ 161. ffto, Pheett. HEAD. Lenni-Lennape. Minfi. Indians of New -England. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochncwagoes. Weel. miupcan. BtqttOfu$ (wood). Onoonjee. Otareh, Otaareh. Onoonjee. - m i n i I ] inn^i * HEAD. 107 I nbknbpin). APTAIM smith), arrish). [ehah. tqueeh. i, Oukili. ood). areh. Wyandots. - Skotau, Noatf-ehee-rah. Hochelagenfes. - Jggonxi, Choktah. - Eebuk. Galibis^ - Oupoupou, Opoupou, Ouboupou. Peruvians. - Uma. MM-«-<-4SKSS©SS\>">-»-^-»* Toungoofi, . 138. Delee. 142. »43- 124. D'il. Semoyads, jtwaret. Kazee-Koomitfki, - 117. Bet. Akafhini, 119. Bei. * NOSE. « Lenni-Lennape. - « Weckeewon. Minfi. - Wichkiwon. Indian»of New-England. Matchanne (wood). Senecas. - Kakondah. Mohawks. - Oon-jfou-fu'w {MS., farrish). Cayugas. Oneidas. _ Enuchfahke. . Onoo-oohfah, O-noo-ooh-fah. Tufcaroras. - Ache-efah, Oche-tifah, Ocheooflah. Cochnewagoes. - Oneeyoohfah. Kauhba. m Eepeefooh. • Mexic|ns. • Jacatl. Perovians. ^ ' Ctnca, the nofe or noftrils. EYE. Lenni'LennapC| Minfi* Wufhkinkuq. Wufchgink. ffu/H>gi«f[HaU,tyei. W* \ It! M io8 EYE. Mahicanni. Naticks. Mcflifaugers. Indians of New-England. Senecas. Mohaw ks. Cayugas. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochnewagoes. Wyandots. Hochelagenfes. Chokuh. Katahba. Keefkq. Wujktfuk, Mujkijuk, «yei. Wufkink. Utfiioi, eyes (waoo). Kakaa, Kegauge, Kikaukif. A tor-lor (mr. farruh). Kaukauhah. Ohkaulau. Okanreh, Okauhreh. Okaraah. Yochquiendocb. Higata, eyes. Eenifflieen. , Neetooh. «4a4«W Tartan, ^. Kos. 94, 98. Koos. 9 1 . Kotx. - 64. Kct, Koet. « 95. Kanok. 97. Karak, Kartek. Tchuvalhi, Tarurs, Kabardiniaa-Tcherkeffi, in. Ne. Suan«tti, - "O- ^'• Kalmuks, - - >37- ^«''«»» E A R. Minfi. Naticks. Miami*. -Senecas. Oneidas. Wichtanuak. Nihtauog, yrifi Tauwaukee. W^-un-tah, Kmn-taug-^, Oh-un-tah. < W W'Wl('";'M:»!ii§;»jv3:fa>jj;^?rr , j#>;>!i^»^S!ffiv%^.«s^*#«w?**':'*'i'" - — "i : t«im ' • "wwiw^igy EAR. 109 h/Ui, «yei. (w«od)« igc, Kikaukiy. Laohreh. cb. 90k. e. Tafcarerai. Cochnewagoei. Wyandots. Hochelagenfes. Choktah. Kauhba. Ohuntneh. Ohukitah, Ohoontah. Hoonuuh. Abontafion, ears. Teehockoloh. Nobkfoo. FOREHEAD. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Katahba. Okeen^ .J- Ochkeiweh. Netaup. Kabardinian-Tcherkeffi, in. iVi^*- MOUTH. Mahicanni. Naticks. Miamis. Senecas. Mohawks. Cocbnewagoes. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Wyandots. Hochclaglnfes. Ootoon. ifumm, UuttwHUt. r-tneeh, alfo the lips. Kijiugattt. Te/a-c6r-lute (mr. Ar»>»»)' Ooflquanuh. Yefaook. Yeafikaren. Ef-(kau-he-reeh. ' E/ahe. Vogoulitchi, - 67- ^«'- , Oftiaks, -, 70'7»'72'73- ^w'- IH iWi no TOO T H. TOOTH. Lenni-Lennape. Wecpeet. Minfi. IFichpit. Indians of New-England. Mepttta, teeth (woo 11). Naticks. Mtepit, Wtifit, Wttpitt, teeth. Senecas. Kanoojah, teeth. Mohawks. Ka-n«-gu-ta, teeth (MR. par mish). Cayugas. Kanoojah, teeth. Oneidas. ^ - • Onouweelah, Onouweeloot. teeth. Tufcaroras. Otoatfeh, Otohfeh, teeth. Cochnewagoet. Onouweelah, teeth. Wyandots. - Ulkoonlheeau, teeth. Hochelagenfes. - Efgongast teeth. Chikkafah. - NoeMe. Katahba. Neeaup. m4.H&S»8S:>-^>-^ Zhiryanc, 59- PeeH> Permi^i, - 60. Ptm. Votiaki, 65. PetH. Vogoulitchi, 68. Pankt, Pitng. _ 69. Wttt. T.O N CUE. Lenni-Lennape. Weeknco. Minfi. Wilanf. Mahicanni. - Neenannuh, my tongue. ■ .-•S?-?**-7BS'II/';;«-:'ei*'ii muni I ■ J i u " 'mw TONGUE. fii > (wooit). , Wttpiit, teeth. h. teeth (MR. PAR* Ch. Onouweeloot, ihfeh, teeth, teeth. , teeth, h. ny tongue. Indians of New-England. Naticl*. • • • Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochnewagoes. Wyandots. Choktah. - ' • Katahba. Galibis. Whenan (wood). Witnannut. Owinaaghfoo, Ouwennanhfuh. OuWentochreh, Auwendochfeh. Owanaachfuh. Undauchfheeau. Soonlulh. Neefoomofeh. Neurou, Enourou. Imeretians, - »09- ^'*^''^ BEARD. Minfj. Wichtoniy. Indians of New-England. - Ifattonantlftf (wOOD). Tufcaroras. Ofubkareh. Cochnewagoes. Koas-tant-har. Wyandots. O^hquieroot. Muflcohge. Iftce-chock-hces feeh. HAND. Lenni-Lennape. Woonochk. Minfi. Hacbk. Mahicanni. Nulhkq, my hand. | Knuflikq, thy hand, i M)amis. Anahkemeh. Mcflifaugers. Noch-kifs. Sankikani. Kachk, the arms. Senecas. - " - Kafchuchtah. 1 i j^t; i ;j_ "ij i j/ i ijc. i j ll wnWjWJ' IIS HAND. Mohawkt. • Ot-nmi-fatu (Ma. farrish). Oneidai. . Ofnooffah. pfnoongee, hands. Tufcarorai. • • O-acht-neh. Wyandots. • Yoreeffaw. Hochelagenfes. - Aignoafcen. Choktah. Katahba. - Ilbuk? Neckfapeeah, Neckfeepeeah, hands. Mexicans. . Maytl. Mahpilli, fingers. Peruvians. - Majui. Chilefe. m Cue. ^ >««>H»-4»< m^^-*- Akafliini, 119. Kak. Eftlandians, - 55- Kaiffei. Carelians, . s6. Kaixit, Kaxit. Lopari, . 58. Kit. Armenians. - 107^ Mat, fingers. Cardt, 77- Tetllit, fingers. Altekefick- Abiffinian, 1 1 ^^ , Matfcha, fingers. Tchechentzi, 114. , Paltek, fingers. Ingufiievtzi. 115. , Pa/*, fingers. BELLY. H Lenni-Lennape. B * Minfi. - M Mahicauni. 9 Naticks. - • - ip Indians r t New-England '!■ MefTifavgei: m'' SaikkiVani. ft $cneci« Moouih. Wacbtey. No-mauch-ui, my belly. tfetniueet. WaiMpifie (wood). Nee-moo-teh, my belly. Natbiy. Theft, ftomach. Katqueeftuh. ■f-"«i"wimp»^ nwr BELLY. 113 «R. rARRKH). noongee, handi. Neckreepeeah. (///, fingers. ti. rs. gers. !rs. 8. ui, my belly. (wood). eh, my belly. Thefi, ftomach. tab. Oncidas. ucninecnounv. Tufcarorai. Ootqueh. Wyandots. Undecrentoh. Hocheiagenfei. Efehehtnda. Muikohge. Iftee-nulch-kee. Choktah. - ^ Cheefut. Mexican*. Xilltmtli. Brafiliani. TigHt, Result. ChUefe. Put. M.4-<-<-«s5assffl;-»->->-»- TchiocbonCci, 54. ff^ai/tt. Carelians. : 56. fral/cbt/cha. Hebrews, 81. ffttM. Kouriltzi, • 162. P/t. Mordva, 61. Paikt. Mokftian, 62. Piiai. Votiaki, 6s. Ket.Peol. Taweeguini, 131. EttJt. AiTyrians, 87. Kte/a. Koriaki, 155. Kefti. Kamubadali, 158. Kalt'iet. m^Lm»« FOOT. Lenni-Lennape. Neezeet, my foot. NeeieetuI, my feet. • Mahicanni. Naticks. Neezeet, my foot. Wufeet, Seet, Muffttt. Wuf- feeta/h, his feet. ♦ Miamis. Kautceh. Sankikani. - Syt, the feet.. I '■ > »* * i lU l li^*- mmf ^ 114 FOOT. Indians of New-Kngland. Senecai. Mohawks. Oneidas. Tufcaroras. Cochnewagoes. Wyandots. HD'hehgenfes. Mufkohge. Chokuh. Kauhba. MexKans. Brafiliaas. Chilefe. Seat (wood). Sheedau, Kaujhitnu. Ot/iiiaw (MR. parruh). Ocbliieecht. Aufcekeli, Auchfcc, Auchlhce. Kallieeuh. OchHieetau. Ottchidafcon, the ftet. Iftee-lectop-pix-fce. Eeyec. Nepapeeah. Icxitl, tlie feet. Chi-pouy, my feet. Namon. ^^•*-*^'Sli^lSi< >«>..>»»«»* Akafliini, Taweegoini Japanefe, Olliaks, Seinoyads, Afgani, or Afghans, Kartalini, Perfians, Curdi, 119. Ka/ch. 131. ^fchta. Top. • 161. Afcbtt, Ahfee\. 75. Top. 127, 128, 129. Tapo. 78. Pchti. 108. Pichit, Peite. 4 76. P»ee, Paa. 77. Pa. SKIN. Lenni-Lennape. - YiMi, fFach/chadey. Minft. Chey. Chippewas. . * Pokkikkin. Mahicanni. Khi. t AJp, according to Thunberg, * ^* SKIN. »»l tau. •arrish). ifcc, Auchfljcc. e f«et. x-fee. eet. hackey. Indians of New-England. Ntttquap (wood). Shawneei. Thia, Tui'caroras. Ehnunkeh. Muflcohge. ■ Iftee-Hulthpee. Cholctah. . Horkfoop. Galibii. k Opipo, Ibippo. Cara'ibei. ' . Nora, my Ikin. BrafilUni. - Pird. -«-4-«-HHS{{affl5i55»-»-»-»-»- Lopari, $8. Nakkt. Tartars, • ^9. Ko$H. Kirghtftzi, 104. KotM, Suanetti. no. Kan, Kituwini, - » 164. P**' Mandihurif >. i63> Sookto. FLESH. Lenni-Lennape. i Weeyoos, lVijo»$. Minfi. Ojoes. Naticks. Wtyaus. Indians of New-England. Mitchin (wood). Miamis. Wee-ofe fee, Woju/e. Meffifaugers. Wiyouffah, WyyouffaH. Indians of Virginia. - Wtghjhaughtt (c apt. sMitm J. Senecas. 0-waa>ah. Mohawlcs. ., • A-»-» ^-' ;■•■■■ ■ Mogul-Tartars, 135. Maicha, Mach*. Boureti, - 136. Maithan, Maikan. i Kalmuks, 137- Machan. Oftiaks, 71. Wode. 7?' fTotte. ' *■ ' Manfliuri, 163, Take, 7t BLOOD. I Lenni-Lennape. . M'hook, Mhuk. ^ Mahicanni. . Pookakan. i - , Miamis. • Nich-pee-caun-weeh, Nici-ie- j • kan-'wai. i Indians of Virginia. Saiinuthoue {CAtTAiK smith). 1 Senccas. - Ot-quoon-fah. 1 Mohawks. - Kat/e ? Oneidas. - Oneequ6nflrah. Tufcaroras. . Kautkeh. Gochnewagocs. - Oneguonflah. Chikkafah. • IJIA- .■ Choktah. J Eeih-ee{h> £a(h-eafli. ' Kauhba. - Eet. Galibis. m Inueenoure, Ttmtnouri. * n,mm i ■ i i y^wji'. i J P MB^ J . i ,J, e »l ' _. ' H ! . BLOOD. trr ch*. aikan. M.".M.<-.S8s;5SSs;»">-»-»"»- Tartar*, 89—96. Kan. 98, 99. Kan, Kangatii, 100. Kan. Teleouti, 101. Kan. Bucharians, • 102. Choon Lefghis, 50,51.52- Bte. Akafhini. 119. E. HEART. riui. lun-weeh, Nici-it- !(CAPTAIN smith). ah. fah. ih. Ea(h-eafli. Lennl-Lennape. Whutteeh, Dti. Minfi- VchJee. Naticki. Wuttah. Indians of New-England. Nogcut (wood) Miamis. Atahhemeh. Algonkins. ,- » Vta. Oneidas. An weal. Tufcaroras. Auwercahfeh. Cochnewagoes. Auweleeh. Wyandots. Yootooihaw. Mulkohge. Eeffeekee. Katahba. Dee-hauh. BrafiUans. Nhia. Chilefe. Puiqut. M-4M-<-iSS5S;2S5S;»"»-^»"»- Perfians, - - 76- Deel. Teel. Curdi, - = 77- Teel. Inbaci, • - 'S» Hto. 1 ■I niiriirrrjjff" ifS LOVE. LOVE, Lenni-Lennape. Minfi. Chippewas. Mahicanni. Tufcaroras. Mulkohge. Dauhok£. jtcboiualtcwoagan. Saukie. Achwanndeen. Keenoorehquau, Kenoofn«, Otchaukeeh. Turks, Afgani, Lefghis, Manihuri, • 88. Snagku. 78. Chachade, - 51. OtloJo. 163. Chadzei. LIFE. Lenni-Lennape. Minfi. Naticks. . LebelUchtnjuoagan. Pommauchfoagan. ' PomoHtamoank. MMMH-«jSSS®SSSS>-»- >'*'*' Karaffini, Semoyads, - 1 30. Hetlla. 1*7. Eellek. 128. Eeleepga. DEATH. Ltnct-Lennape. - Angelleagan, Angellvwoagan, Angiln, to die. ■.^•^^^,-ij^,.:--'-r>--v*»r^-'i-~-^' - mil iMpi i ! i)jiwi i L ii iiL i . ii *i » !"m i yi!ii. i L i| . ' . ' >|L'. !|i v' an. Minfi. Tartan, DEATH. »«f jingelloivoagan, NupfuwagwU Mannihillrwoagan, Matmi' hillaan, to die. 91. Adgal. 93. Adgnl. 1, Kenoofne. SUN. jffigtllewoagMn, die. Lenni-Lenn^pe. Minfi. Mahicanni. Naticks. Indians of New-England. Miamis. - ■ Meflifaugers. Indians of Virginia. Senecas. Mohawks. r Cochnewagoes. Cayugas. Oneidas. - T Tufcarorus. Wyandots. Naudoweffies. Iflati. - : Cheerake. ibhikkafah Choktah. Kauhba. Keelhoobt Ci/chuch. Kelhough. fltpauz. Cone (wood), Keelliflwoa. Kee(hoo. Kefovwghti, '? funncs" (capt, smith). Gachquaa. Kil-au-quofw (MR. parRISH). Karachquau. Gauquau, Kauauglquaw. Weighneetah, Wighntttau f. Heghta, Hccgthteh, Heightah, Egaur, Eekaar. Yaundeefhaw. low/ (PATIIER HENNEHN). Louis (father hemmepin). Calefta. Ntttak-Hafeh. Haflic, NeetakHaJeh. NooCeeh. \\ % t la the language of the Coadagoi, f('„Mia fignife, a monilu Wnniri"^^ ';_ ' " *^'"^.'" ' ' "*""" _T!jj:«*:->t,*::s " ^^f^^i^i^tni^^a^ff^mnmi i i^^ i U |i^i"^"^^ 5S \. 110 Natchez. Indians of CoHuacani Efquimaux. Qalibis. Brifiliant. Peruvians. Cfailefc. S U N. Kottowi, Afliani, Kamtchadals, JFachil (bossu). Tonatico (peter marttr). ShikoHttk, Sakakmk. ye'iou, Hue'iou. Couaraffit Coaftr. Ynti. Antu. ••4*4 "^Mv*. ©SfiS©®^-^-*"' r 149- £# ^ 150. Oega. V 158. laatfch. ■f MO O N. Lenni-Lennape. Minfi. Mahicanni. Naticks^ Miamis^ MeiCfaugers. Indians of Virginia^ Senecas. Mohawks. Cocknewagoes^ Cayugas. Oneidas^ TuTcaroras^ Wyandots. Naudoweflies, Cheerake. Neepauee-Keefhooh. Nipahum, Nipahump. Nepahuck, Nepa\»k. Hanepaujhadtoh. Peekontah-Keelliflwoa. Lenaupe-Keeflioo^ Heptt'wvjepowghs , " moones" (captain smith). Gachquau. Kil-au-quaw (mr. parrish). Ochneetah, Aughneetah. Gauquau, Kauaughqua'w. Konwaufontcgeak? Wighnttiau, Oneetah. Hatftfc-Neahah, Hatfhe-Nya- hah, Vittg\.\i\c\i, Aii/tnhHihbau. Yaundeefliaw. Louis Bafatfcbe (father meh- nepin). Tcennoe-Nenloghe (b). I ). IK marttr) ittui. fr. % ,.[|1J.IUI.JJ - ,. I," M O O N. 'IV Iflkti. Chiklcafi«h. Chbktah. Kauhba. Indians of Collnacan. Efquimaux. Galibis. ChUefe. Louis Bafatfcht (rATHER H8«- NEPlNf Nttnnak-HaJJih. Halhe-Ncenak, Neennak-HaJJ^. Nooteeh. Tona (peter martyr). Takock. j Nouna, Noutto. \ Cuytn. Gau, the planets. ..4HM-4-4J Koriaki, 153- Gaitlgti ■«.-W S*T A R. LennULennapc. efhooh. Minfi. \ahump. Mahicanni. lepattk. Naticks. ,h. MUmis. Mcffifaugers. ** - •elliflwoa. ihoo. Indians of Virginia ughs, " moones" smith). Senecas. Mohawks. -J (mr. parrish). Cayugas. \ughneetah. Oneidas. auavghquatu. •geak? IVigbntilau, Tufcaroras. tah, Hat(he-Nya- l»teh, Aufinhnibbau. Cochnewagoes. V. Wyandots. 'che (father mew- Cfieerake. Alaanguefe, A bunguees. Alank, AUank. Anak&fs. Annokfock, ftars. Wanonk. iVanankook, ftars. Alaungua. Alaunguakeeh, ftars. Minnato-Woccon. Pummahumps, " ftarres" (Caf- TAIN SMWH). OjeefyondaK. Ojiftok, Ko-jis-taek. Ojiflbntah. Yoojiftoqua, Oojiftoquoh. Yoojiftoqualonee, ftars. ^ Nich-foon-reeh, Nich-feen- rech.Ot chis-noch queb, O- di(h-fon-dau, O-jis-tieh-fua. Ojiftoak, Ojiltoke. Teelhoo, ftars. Nthu^i, ftars (a). "■M roghe (b). .J&, r.:onmi.i~(rJ j .(Ui'-' i t :>i:„ 'l ''W:""^'^' ' ■ i.riljl I I i'"i»iil 11"! — 1 — — *i i ■ m # # 121 * STAR. » Muikohge. • • K6t-ch6t-chum-pah f . Chikkafah. ^ - i»/&«/f/t»/(. Ckoktah. w * Phitchek, Pkutchik. M^' Gtolibu. • Serica, Siricco. % mafilians. . - lafi-tata-miri, " all the foiatt ftars." Peruvians. . - Cit«/r<», the ftar Venus. iln£s. Ckilefe. . Guaglen, ftars. Gau, the ] P«/. or iJ//A«, the coMleUa- t *'■ ^ -f »-">"*'»-f5t Afani, ISO. ^/««. K*ardinian Tcherkeff i. III. jr«^», r«//f-&fl. ^ * Kittawini, . 164. £';mr.j Kourilui, - - 163. A>/«, Reekop. Permuki. - . 60. Kad. Hebrews, . - - 81. KochatUt Jews, -' - 8z. Koeecbmu. Oftiaks, 1^ • 70. Tihocs, Chos. 7*. 73. 74- 7>- »53- Kos. •'« Cboas. * Gattlgtu, the noon. Kotiaki, Careliansc * Tclnochonlkt, ♦. 54- Taigtet. Taihtit. Olonetei, • 57- Tecbtetl. * * i RAIN." 1 Lenid-Lennape. Minfi. • m Sekelaatt, Sobkoolann. Sechktlaatt. 1 t The Arabs, 85, call the t^, rfitans, Scbims, and 5<«««#. t See tUe Tufsarora wardt^^r tWSun and Mwn. ■aa^i.-ff i-pah f . \lchik, "allthefaiatt ir Venoi. j Gau, tbe plnets. w, the coftftcUar % nooB> Ikoolann. Stbanu* t _ y-^ ■ % ♦ . , % # ^ ^R A I N. * m Mahicanni. Soaknaun. Naticks. Sokanoif^Wufokanen. Miamis. ^kikani. Peeteellonwoh. Soukertt. % Unecat. Oftandeoh. Mohawks. U-ca-un-6-la (mr. parrish). ^eidas. Tofcaroras. Yoocaunour. Yookonnoal. Whauhantoot, Wantooeh, Uh- tueb. Cochnewagoej. -^f YauoongCee. Naudoweffie|j|l - If Cheerake. •- O-iuab Meneb. Maflcohge. Oaikeh. Chikkafair. - Oombah. Choktah. - , . -%« Umbah. Katahba. Ookforeh. Woccons. Tavtowa. Mexicans. ^iahuiztli. ^ Carai'bes. KonSbtui. "^ Brafilians. Amen. * * d^jfefc. - Mauu, Mmki. m ,.Leniuipe. Mahicanni. SNOW. Kooni|^ R wti'Tintf-'t:'"'' "*"•-■" ■ BJv,*3fl^l. -••?^"' '■" L Mil III pi ^W Naticki. Miami I. Sankikani. I^necas. Mohawks. Cayugas. Oneidaa. Tufcaroras. Cochnev/agoes. Wyandots. Cheerake. Chokuh. Kauhba. Woccons. Mexicans. Brafilians. Chilefe. ^ SNOW* Keen. Mannatwoa* ffyHoyvvte. mi^ Honeyahyeh, Honeyyahyeh^ U-g6'la>W (MK. PAKRIStl)* Okah. O-nee-yeant. w Oo-eatr-e-reh, Oo-ee' f-e-reh, JaunquCt Cv-^» Mocb^uammi- Ar-yot^juo-neeh? Coepol (wood) Oweefah. Yoowiffee. . Ooweefleh. Owifleh. Deefliaw. PiltHgii. 126. Poda. *% 115. Scha. 116. P/cba. D A Y. Lenni-Lcnnape. Minfi. l^ieks. g' Miamis. Onondagos. Oueidas. Cheerake. Chikkafah. » Choktah. ChUefe. Keeflifltoo. Gi/chgu. * Ukki/uk. ^ E^fpetteh. Wdtnta, li'ahttta. Wfcneea^ Ikh (b). Neetak. ^Ntetak. ^ '^Antit, Anchu. /» Kabardinian-Tcherkeffi, lU. At/chnw. 126 NIGHT. * I.enni-Lennape. Minfi. Mahicanni. Miamis. Pottawatameh. Mohawks. Onondagos. Oneidai. Tufcaroras. Naudowr "j. Iffad. Cheerake. Mufkohge. Ghikkarah. ^ Cl^kuh. Woccons. Galibis. Brafilians. Peruvians. Chilefe. 9^ NIGHT. ^ Pecflccoh. Pitjiiu, dark. Tputhcu. Tepockq, Neepauweh. Pachkoantekeeh. Pecuneah. AghfiMthta, Ach/ontha. 9 Kawoflbndeak. ^ OofottM, Autfonneah, Ancht- %'■ tfeeneeah, Yootfautheb. BafatfAi, Bafatchi. 7 Ba/at/cbi, Bm/auhi.* S . > fltttbltth, Neethleeh. Jk i eJtinHok. k •* Yantoha, "^ nt • % »^ Putuna^ ■ 4* "*. Tuta. •f* Pmn, Pautt. * - 75- ^"*- *% Scnioyads, i*i,»la.i?3. »I4" ^"' % Ofetti. - ^- ^- Achfrf^Achfiv.. Dugorri, . ' - 8o. ^f^ai^*. Oftiaks, . Ou the authority of Father Hennepin. Thi. author fometime. fpeaks of the Naudoweflie. aiJ W&U as one tribe, and at othe>t.m«,a. two tribes. , 4 ' 1^^ f ft -wr * » iiu, dark. !pauweh. h. inneah, Ancht- 'ootfautheh. itcit. 1 %tcht,* I thleeh. lak. 4 % i. NIGHT. 127 Koriaki, Semoyads, >S3- «S4- 126. 128. 127. Netg'iniA, Nitkttntei. Ntkttla. PttH, Pitl. Pun- r PtltH. MORNING. Lenni-Lennape. Naticks. Miamis. Mohawks. Ckokuh. Aallapaueh. ^ • Mmhtompan. Chaieepanweh. ' j# ,^Yorhtanjki. » • Oonl^heleh, ^ < • ' . WulS>i> WooUakob. . ^'Attaqoe^ec. . Chokuh. *- ^ d| lilh«^nn«ii^h6me. Lenni-Lennape. nRamis. tt|^- Mohawks. # « ¥ author fometime* cl at othtytiunt*,u S U M*M E B*.* Lenni-Lennape. Minfi. Il^iamis. - ^ Indians of Virginia. Scnecas. Oneidas. Mulkohge. Choktah. Ch'iefe. *- r )>Ieepun. . ^^ |^ Nichfen. ^ Nej^enwceh, Nipimvai. » Cohattayough {^avt. imitb'). Kan-guit-tik-iteh. t »KaiiJfaa-kui||icak-kee. -'., Milke, A/i/i«. ^^ Lulhpah, furgmcr. and warm. %. « ♦ ♦■ iM>>»*ia»'» t i - "I.' 'I' "* laS SUMMER. Tchiochonfki, Olonetzi, Lopari, Moklhtn, Aflkni, 54. Ktxa. ^. Kezai. 58. Keze. 150. Pala, haraiag heat, hot ther &c. wean '^W 1 N T E R+. Lenai'Lennaf e. ^- - '^^|Jlwon. Minfi. jf^» *^ 'A ^'^f* Mahipnni. ^ ■ ' - " ^o6n. Ntrraganits. .,» . #• 0|l»«F Shawne(p ;♦ «A V^K inia. ' J^cfMnweeh, Eiformiai. M. *'- I»-«%„flw (CAPTAI W^.*' ^anew (captain 8MiTH)^k^ I. . ». ■» JPofanow (< runch-neh ? Hkdi-ldklce. bas. ' Oneiclat. t W, Tufcarorai. |^- -^ j^' ChccSke. -JtM^A^ ^oV«.-^ Mulko^ge. • - - % , muffo, 7W/«>. Chikkafah. ,*- ^ - m^fira. AJbCora Coppeefah. Puqutn, 'Choktah#M| r* •% •««e the American word* iw Sun, and Moon t Thi^article 4r ^^''7 i>"P^f"^ '" 'he Ktcabuhria Cimfaratna of •^ - •• % .f •W "« ■ ""( ■ heat, hot wea^ , Bifouivai. «. , ■ . laffo, peefah. Arr/j Cimfaralima Of EARTH. OR LAND. f 129 EARTH, OR L A'N D. Lenni-Lennupe. Minfi. M*hicanni. • f Natickj. Nirraganfcts, Ac. Melfifaugers. Indians of Virgmia. Senecas. Mohawks. afcaroras. »* Cayugai Oneidas. CochnewSfbes. Chikkafah. Chokiah. Chokchoomah. Mexicans. Poconchi. Jaioi, in Goaiana Galibis. g.Brafili?.ns. Chilefe. » Whaunahquckc, the whole Hockkce, ^^i* \ Hockkec. Ohkf, Ohktit, Okiii. Juki, Sanaukamuci. J^ •# Aljpehkecwee.^hithkeewce. . • Nindoh-lIockeR' . ■* a^/y?/. (e|PTA!,N »MIT«). **' |BkQ||uiqea, Youjmihtnjaudf- .CKhoA>ieeaW ... ^ a t i ii ii' i i ji f i w- i i'ii i Ai i r I « ■'« ■ i i ■! ' i i ** " i3» EARTH, OR LAND. Bacharians/ Tangutani, Mandfhud, Semoyads, Kit^wini, Chinefe. Tchiochonfki Olonetzi, - 102. Ciiai, - i6;. Sa, 163. Na. 120, 122, 1 24. gT**, 1 26. Toattfcb. %t, 164, 7S. Ttj^ according to Bell, 57. ^a. -• ^ 166. Poo, Boo, Piiate, Epthoo, !« Lenni-LennajjjISP ^il^* "Sw^W NarfSga»fets. - ^^^^^(^oop, Mgifaifci.V - % J^ippee. l4B»> of N^^tlagfili. # ll^r(wooD). j|( ▼^ Indians of ^ir^ll^ M^ Jt Slkiabanna ^aftaih smith), Scnecas. - |^ • 'H^ |t JJeekafc^osT Oncckanoofh, l^H^^ *Oneckanu(h. * • Mohaiyks. Cayugas. ^%- ^ ^ *Onei « «- > Tufcaroral. acnn hneckanos, Oghnacaunnth. Oghnacauno, Oaknekahnoos, Hochneak. Auweah, Auwea, Auweau, Oagknekanoos. • Tfandoofteek. Cocnnewagoes. Wyand^. 4» ^terake. 'HI '^ "4|k> J^wwa, ^«i««. ^«tf (b), Mulkohge. ^ - 'O'weewauh. Chokt|>i. * • _ O'weewauh. Okah. 4 ■',.1 # * ■#. • V i^j ^nr ID. tng to Bell. foie, Eptbto. ^AFTAIK $M!TH)« 17 Oneckanoofh, lih. iS (MR. PARRIIh). II, OghnacauHHtb. , Oaknekahnoos, Ic. Luwea, Auweau« »0S. V, k. na. Ama (b). Katahba. ^ Natchez. Mexicans. Poconchi. ChUefe. WATER. 4 131 Eyau. Ooj^o (adair). , AtU AtU Aitt, Atlt. Ha. Co. •-«-4M-<-«j55ilSS5s>S^*"*' *-*'*' Kooriltzi, - - 162. Pee, Pe. Turks, - - 'a* 5ofl. ^ Tartars, 89,90,92,93,96, ' Soo. -^ 98. ,. . m * — — ^— ^7 A^^^^j Seogr; • ' ^ Zhiryane. - ■ %. Wa^ f,.M, ' * Perroiaki, - - ^feo. ^a.^ f\ * Curdi. - -^ 3i4 iH"^-^' * < J Semoyads, * - ^fm»^|^3| ^ »' Vogoulitchi, - ^ *6 jWJ^-^If'' *' ^r Showiah-laEtaguage, in Africa.^»«^i7 pr. shaw^) ^ ^ • . ~^^- . ^ * •« ^ «■ jt* Lenni-Lennape. - m , '][|kndai, Taindit *. Luneu, Mahicanni. Naticks. Narraganfets. ^tiiamis. '" - |f Kaflcafkias. Meffifaugers. Indians of Virginia. it bnau.'# Sta-»h, S^ooV»^^ Chuk-kutJcLk-koSt. K^O^eh. Ko-te-weeh. Scut-teh, Scd4t-teh. | I PaiMtwfr (^APTAIN SMVtU'}, t ■ ^ • Tainda. Vocabularium Barbaro"y|K«neiru«.| « ii J 13* FIRE. cw 111 Senecas. Mohawks. Cochnewagoes. Cayugas. Oneidas. Caneflogas. Tufcaroras. Wyandots. Naudoweffiei. Cheerake. Mufkohge. Cliikkarah. Choktah. Katahba., Woccons. N«|hez. « Shebaioi. Chilcfe. • # O-jeeft-tah, Ojeeft-tau, O- jift-tah. Oo-cher-li (mr. parrish)^ O-chee-leh. O-jees-tah, 0-lake-hau. 0-jifth-teh, Ojis-ta, Yooteck. O-jeeh-lah? Ot-chee-re, Oot-chee-reh, Ot- chift-neh, O-chift-neh, O- cliiee-ah, O-jis-neb, Yoo- necks. Tchees-tah. Pa^itah. Chura. Tcila (B.) Toat-kah, Tote-kah. Lm^, Loo-wak, Loo-wock. iioo-ak ,£pee. Yau. ^ Of- - V fTecoefye. "^ Cuthal, ... Celts, - - 13. Htn, Dar. Celts of Little- Britany, ,14. Tan. IriOi. Erfc of Scotland, - >7- llnne (COLONEL VALLANCET.) TeiNt. Welfh, Vogoulitchi, - 67.' Tan. % Taoot. Tat, Nate, Toot.. Oniaks, Kouriltzi, Kittawini, - 162. Apte, Awptt. Liho, tio. ■ ' ^ 1l. lOlL. Ijeeft-tau, O- Iparrish). t:s-ta, Yooteck. It-chee-reh, Ot- •chift-neh, O- jis-nth, Yoo- B.) ;e-kah. :, Loo-wock. I BL VALLARCET.) FIRE. The old Perfian Idiom, 170. Attref:h. Tonqainefe, in Tonquin, 182. Hoa, Looa. Gipfies, - - 166. Tag, Tak, Tag$. «33 WOOD. Lenni-Lennape. Taahon. Minfi. Chos. Mahicanni. Matook. Narraganfets. Ootcunch. Miamis. Tauwaanee. Meffifaogers. Netaukao. Acadians. Nimbeck, & foreft. Indians of Virginia. MufeSt " woods" (CAPTAXM smith). Senecas. Kauneafttau. Mohawks. Oo-yen-da (mr. parrish). Oneidas. Oeyeant, Oyeant. Tufcaroras. Orenneh, Orenhna, Ker|dihee, a tree. Cochnewagoes. SOyenteh. Wyandots. Tauhuuh. Checrake. jittn (b). Intikti, a foreft (b). Choktah. - - . Ecteh. Katahba. Eeup. Celts, - - 13. Mata, Hate. Portuguefe, - - .26. Matta. Kouriltzi, - - 162. Nit. End of the Conaparative Vocabularies. June 28th, 1798. » J I l l i H ii mw i I If ll .■..-,- .Yf— . .MOiitt^t^M^ APPENDIX, CONTAINING NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS. L [T is my intention, in this Appendix, to add a few fafts and obfervations, with the view of illuftrating and correfting- certain parts of the preceding pages, particularly certain paf- fages in the Preliminary Difcour/e. Thefe fa^s and chfcrva- tions will, I flatter myfelf, ferve, in fome meafure, to increafs the value of this little Avork ; whilft they may tend to amufe and relieve the reader in the progrefs of an inquiry, in which I regret that it has not been in my power to pay more at- tention to arrangement, and to ftyle. Page XXV. " Lenni-Lennape, which fignifies the Original People." Since the publication of the firll edition of thii woik, I have met with Lofkiel's Hijlory of the MiJ/ion of the United Brethren among the Indians in North- America f , a work which contains much ufeful information. The author fays that the meaning of Lenni-Lenape is Indian menX. Mr. Heck- ewelder is my authority for the interpretation whirji I have adopted, and I have good reafon to believe that his opinion it well founded. Page xxxi. " do not know the meaning of the word Chippewas, or Chippe\^ay." " The Delawarcs call the Chip- puwas, Schipwwe, or as I fliould write it Englifh Shepwwaj. t Ennlifli tranflation. London. \ Part I. p. a. A* 17»V *«'i« o I APPENDIX. This word is Delaware and figniiieth luhifiliHg. I think the word quite applicable to a kind of whiftling they have, in calling to one another*." Page xxxi. " The Minfi, or Monfees." They likewife call themfelves Miniffi, or the Peninfula-People, becaufe they inha- bited the Miniffink, The tradition of thefe Indians infofms us, that they originally dwelt in or under a lake, fron\ whence they have fprung. It is curious that a tradition fimilar to this prevails an">ng other American tribes. The Miamis^ fay that they fprang out of the lakes. Anio.ig the nations of South- Ameiica, t!ie Collas, according to La Vega, afTert that their firfl parents iiTued from the great lake of ') iiicaca, which they efteemed as their mother. " The Mahicanni, or Mahiccans, &c." The nation of the Mahicanni is compofed' of three clans : the Much-quauh, or Bear-tribe : the Mech-cha-ooh, or Wolf-tribe, and the Toon- pa-ooh, or Turtle-tribe. The right of chofing the fachem, or chief, refides in the Bear-tribe. There is fome, but not much, difference in the dialefts of thefe three tribes. This may not be an improper place to mention, that the nation of the Delawares formerly confided of four tribes, v/hich were called the Turtle, the Wolf, the Turkey, and the Crow tribes. The Turtle was the head of thefe tribes, be- caufe, fay thefe Indians, the Turtle is a Mannitto, who can live both upon land and in water. The Wolf-tribe was the fecond in rank, becaufe the wolf is a great hunter and can provide well. The Turkey was the third in rank, becaufe this bird feeds upon a variety of good fruits and roots, fuch as the chefnut, the whortle-berries (Vaccinium), and others. The ( . . v-tril " was the laft in rank and refpcftability. For i ■ • Mr. Heck ■■•■■■ -der. M, S. j>erui mt. m I think the they have, in y likewirecall aufe they inha- ndians infotms |e, fron\ whence n fimilar to this iamisj fay that itions of South- aflert that their :aca, which they ic nation of the Wiuch-quauh, or , and the Toon- fing the fachem, s fome, but not tribes. nention, that the 1 of four tribes, Turkey, and the thefe tribes, be- 'annitto, who can >lf-tribe was the : hunter and can in rank, becaufe 8 and roots, fuch urn), and others, peflability. For APPENDIX. $ his inferiority the Indians affign the following reafon, viz. that the crow feeds upon thofe things which are thrown away as offals, or ufolefs. While the chief uf the turtle-tribe had a right to call all the other chiefs of liis nation together to his council, and while he afled as the ])refident of this coun- cil, the chief of the crow-tribe could rsver rifd to any higher dignity, in the nation, than to that of lighting the council- fipe, and handing it to the other chiefs and councillors aflembled together. The crow-tribe has been extinft above Afty years. At prefent, the turtle-tribe having no ailing chief, the fuperiority is veiled in the wolf-tribe. I referve my fpeculations concerning this and moil of the other fubjedls of this appendix for my larger work. Page xxxii. " The Shawnees, more properly Sawwannoo, or Sawanos, are a fouthern tribe." I have lately been affured, that the Shawnees preferve a tradition, that they were driven by the Spaniards from the borders of Mexico. " I have no doubt, fays Mr. John Hcckewelder, that the Shawnefe for- merly refided on the borders of Mexico. The late Col. Geo. Croghan, agent of Indian affairs, &c. told me, twenty-feven years ago, that the Shawnefe once lived beyond the Creek -na- tion, and in Florida ; that they had been driven about con- tinually, until they at length came almolt to nothing. Their being called by the Delawares Scha-xvaitno, denoteth their ori- ginyWr to the South." Letter to me, dated March 2-jth, 179H. I think it highly probable, that it will, at fome future day, be afcertained, that this and other dialects of what I have called the Delaware language, were fpoken within the limits of the Mexican empire. Mechuacan, the name of one of the fined provinces of Mexico, appears to me to be a De'aware word. Page xxxiii. " The Potiawatameh,'' &c. Mr. Heck- pwcldi-'r fuppofes that Pattawattomis (fo he writes the word) ^ APPENDIX. means the Blawtrs, or Blowing People. " for Potaween U Delaware, and fignifieth to blow." Potawacan in this Un- guage fignifies a bellows.* Page xxxiii. " The Miamis. ^r Miamies." This is theii own or national name. They arc called by the Delaware!, Twichtwe, or Twichtwees. " The Meffifaogers, or Mcffafagues." The language of thefe Indians is, undoubtedly, very nearly allied to that of the Chippewas, Naticks. and others at the head of ny larger lifts. But it conuins words in the languages of fome of the fouthern tribes alfo. Page xxxvi, Pampticoughs. Mr. H«ckewelde. conjee tpres that the Pampticoughs are the Indians who are now called Nantikoks, or Nanticoksf. I a9» not inclined to favour this opinion. As I have not, in ihe preceding pages, Uken any notice of the Nanticoks, 1 (hall fay fomething con- cerning tkem in this place. They are a fouthern tribe. There can be no doubt that they are the Nautaquak mentioned by Captain John Smith J. He places them, in the year 1608, on the eaftern fide of the Chefapcak-Bay. In the year 1748, ten canoes of thefe Indians came up the river Sufquebanna, from Maryland §. They fettled at Shencngo or Schenenk, on the Sufquehanna. About the year 17S4. they moved, by invitation, in a body to the weftward, and fettled up the river Miami. One family of thefe Indians refides with the Chn- ftian or Moravian Indians in Upper-Canada. A few ftmihc, arc fettled in the ftate of New -York. * M. S. fcHti mc. . + M. S. pous m,. i The General Hiaoric of Virginia, fcc p, 5? $ Reverend Mr. Pyrl.-cuf. •wr • Potaween U n in this lun- This is theii :he Dela wares. e language of ied to that of d of my larger offome of the weldci conjec- i who are now not inclined to eceding pages, fomething con- fouthern tribe. iquak mentioned I the year 1608, 1 the year 1748. er Sufquehanna, ;o or Schenenk, they moved, by led up the river with the Chri- A few families A P I' E N D I X. f TheNanticok, are one of the darkeft of all the North- American tribes. They have " this fmgular cufto^x., fays Loflciel. that about three, four, or more months aft.r the funeral they open the grave, take out the bones, clean and dry them, wrap them up in new linen, and inter '!««• ag.am^ A feaft is provided for the occalion. confifting of the belt they can afford •". I have not been able to obtain any fatisfaaory information concerning the language of the Nanticoks. I have, mdeed. been informed by an Indian of the Wunaumeeh tribe, that there are fomc words comtnon to the Nanticock and Delaware laneuages. He particularly mentioned the words. Beeh. wa- terf and Kee(V.ooh. the fun. The refcmblance. however, be- tween thefe languages cannot be very great ; for Mr. Heck ewelder. who is well acquainted with the duled. of th« Lenni-Lennape. Cfuld notobfcrve any affinity between thefe J:i:;!tnd the Na'nticock ; and Mr. David ZeUb^J^-^^ underftands the dialefts of the fix nations, could find no re- femblance between thefe and the Nanticok. The follow.ng fpecimenof the language of thefe Indians (the only one on ^ lean place dependence) was ^o-d by the reverer^ Mr Pyrlxus. a German miffionary. many years ago It was Hndly o-municated to me by my friend Mr. Heckewdder. £)//, one. FUi, Two. Sa^.. Three. A'-- ^". ^- ^^ ' ^irc, Six. mil.n,o. Seven. Secki, Eight. CaIU.,o, N.ne. T.. Ten I have carefully compared thefe numerals with thofe ofthePampUcoughst. without difcovering -X affinUV b- twe. n them , nor have I been able to d.fcover any affinity be ween them,, and the numerals of the Chilefe. the Mcxuans. Dtwindians. Cheerake,Mur.ohge.Chikkafah. Choktah, 1 ;inia, &c- p, M • Parti, p. «»:• f In Lawfoa. 6 APPENDIX. Woccont, Mohawks, Onondagos, Naodowrnies, Monfccs, and other tribes. 1 find, however, a ftriking alHnifv between fome of thcfe iiumerals of the Nanticoks and th? numerals of certain Afiatic tribes. Thus, the Tchuvaflii call wight, Sakar . the Aflyrians, Sei'it : the Tartars, Scenes, Sdas : :lie Tc- leouti, Segis : the Kirghiftzi, Steiti : not to mention others. The Pcrfians t J! Ten, Da, Dei : the Curdi, Da, Tga. Page xxxvii. " The Senecas, Mohawks, Onondagoi, Cayugas, and Oneidas." Lawft>n calls the Senecas, Si»»agars. li. fome of the printed accounts, they are called the Sinicktrs. In the French accounts of our country, they are better known by the pame of y/e»«9»/efl»j. The Mohawks are fometimei called Gagnifguez, or Agniex. The Oneidas, fometimes called Onneiouts,* denominate th-.nfelves 0-»m-_>'o-/«-«« cau, or "the people of the pc.pendicular done," from a flone which they have long held in high venerationf. The hiftory of the Oneid^is commences with their e(labli(hment at the well end of the Oneida-Lake, in the ftate of New- York, not far from the prefc at refidence of the tribe. But, I think I can trace fbem in Virginia, prior to this fettlement, in the reign of qat:cri Elizabeth. The Caneftogas, who were fettled in Vir- ,'^tnic<. about the time 1 allude to, were certainly nearly allied to the Oneidas. The Onondagos, whom Hennepin calls Oiinontaguex, or the " Mountainten," are alfo fometimes called Onontagers. Their name is, undoubtedly, taken from the word Onontes, which, in their language, (igtiifies a mountain ; becaufe tlie country which they inhabited was more mountain- ous than that of the other tribes. Indeed, there were no mountains to be fccn in any part of the extenfive territories of the conftideracy except in that which was occupied by the Ononda^ The Ciyugas livtJ to the weft of the Onon- • Hennepin. f Judge DCAM. Jj NTonfccs, and init;' between lif nuni' ralg of tight, Sakar : iiuej : :lic Tc- L-ntion others. Onondagoi, cas, Sinnagari, d the Sinicim. : better known are fometimei metimes called lu cau, JF "the >ne which they hiftory of the t the well end k, not far from ik I can trace 1 the reign of fettled in Vir- ly nearly allied Hennepin calls >metimes called iiken from the es a mountain ; nore mountain- there were no ifive territories iccupied by*the of the Onon- nr" ** APPENDIX. f Jagos. They are called, by fomc wr'nen, Orongeutnt,* but are better known by the name of Cayugas, Cayogas, Cajkgu, or Cayukers. The greater p*rt of this tribe rcfides, at prefent, in Upper-Canada. A few families are fettled on the eaftern banks of the beautiful Cayuga-Lake It is well known that thcl'e five tribes, together with the Tufcarorae, arc commonly criiled by the French writers, Iroquois. They call themfelve* ^Iquanofchiini , which fignificj the Ailikd Hoi'-sk or Family. Page xxxviii. " Three of the tribes in the confctlcracy arr called the elder, and two the younger tribes. The formf the Senccns, the Mohawk >, :ind the Onondagos. The are the Cayugas and Oneidas. The Mohawks call felvesthe oldeft branch of all." In the above paflagi lowing other writers +, I have fallen into an error i conU- derable magnitude. Late inquirifs have convinced inc, that the Mohawks, the Oneidas, and the Onondagos are the oldeft branches of the confederacy, and the Cayugas and Seneca* the younger. The original propofition for the eftablifliment of this celebrated and once powerful confederacy, proceeded from the Mohawks. They afterwards received into their number the Oneidas, who were their next bretliren towards the weft ; then the Onondagos, Cayugas, and laftly theSenecas. I am in poffeflion of a very inierelling original paper concern- ing the foundation of the confederacy. It was Thannawage, an aged Indian of the Mohawk-tribe, who made the propofal to unite. The following are the names of the head-men of the five tribes who were fent as deputies to eftablilh the con- federacy : viz. Toganaiuita, of tlie Mohauks ; Otctfchichte, of the Oneidas ; Tatotarho, of the Onondagos ; Togahajon, of the Gaiuquas, or Cayugas ; and GaoKtatario and Satagaruuyes of the Senecas. The reader may, perhaps, be defirous to know, ' Hennepin. t See Mr. Jeffcrfon's Kote» on the ^Uate of Virginia, page 351. 1 I APPENDIX, in what manner thefc nations, who were ignorant of wriiing< could (hus prefcrve (he namei or their (/;/)«//>/. In order to Kcomplidi this, it wns refolved, that one chief in each of the satioai fliould for ever bear //&Wr names. The Indian who com- municated this account ofthe origin of the confederacy to Mr. Pyrlsens, was the grandfon of Togahiijon, whom I have men- tioned as one ofthe deputies fiom the Cayoga-tribe*. Page xl. " The Cochncwngoes are a branch of the Mo- hawks." They feparated from tlic Mohawks about one hun- dred years ago. At this time, tiie Mohawks were fettled on the river which ftill bears their name. Tor a confiderable time, the principal fcttlcments of the Cochnewagoes were the fpot where Fort-Hunter is built, and the place ftill called Cochncwaga, about twenty-four miles well of Schencdlady, on the north-fide ofthe Mohawk-River. My friend the Reverend Mr. Morfe, under the head of Cighnewaga, fays " It is not improbable that" the Cochnewagoes " formerly inhabited this place f." The word Cochncwaga, or Cochnewakee, fjgnifics (if my memory does not fail me) " the fwift-running ftre.im," a name in reference to the Mohawk-river, the current of whih 's ra H. Pages"! . i. Wyandols. The Dclawarcs call the Wy- andots, Z, ^.naff amies. The Wyandots are one of the na- tions whom the French writers denominate Hurons. Page xliii. TheChecrake. The Delawares call the Chee- rake, Gaitochwa, which perhaps fsgnifies the Travellers, or Travelling People, or Wanderers %. Speaking of thefe In- dians, Mr. William Bartram fays, " 1 made no inquiry con- cerning their original defccnt or migrations to thefe parts, but • M. S. communicated to me bv Mr, Heckcwcldcr. t Tlic American Gazetteer, &c Uoflcii : 17;J7. \ Mr. Heckcwcldcr. W"' lint of wriiingi In order to tn each of the |dian who com- cdcracy to Mr. I have men- Iribe*. h of the Mo- labout one hun- trcre fettled on a confiderable agocs were tho ace flill called chencftady, on d the Reverend ays " It is not lerly inhabited Cochnewakce, e fwift-running iwk-rivcr, the :s call the Wy- one of the na- irons. :5 call the Chee- Travellcrs, or ng of thefe In- no inquiry con- thefe parts, but h. Heckcwcldcr. L t**t- ^> ^^ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 4/ 4v ^ A Zi ^ 1.0 I.I 1.25 1^ us lUUu -1^ 1.8 U 111.6 «'. Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14S80 (716) 872-4503 \ iV 4 •^ \\ 9> V 6^ S' CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductlons / Instltut Canadian de micro, eproductions historiques I •f V r I APPENDIX. 9 I underftooJ that tiney came from the weft, or funfetth.g." * Some of the Cheerake aflert, that the country which they now inhabit W.1S their firft foil. Every circumllance feems to fa- vour the opinion, that tlicfe indians have long been eftabhihed in the country eaft of the Miffifippi. Paoe vlv. " The Mufltohge, Mufcokees, or Creeks." The Delawares call thefe Indians, Mafjuachki. " The worl is quite plain, and meancth/tv^w/;/ land, wherefore they might be called the Sr^amplandcrs:^ \ I cannot help conjeaunng, that it wii; be found, that the Creeks arc nearly related to the Tlafcallans, fo celebrated in the hiftory of the conqueft of Mexico. I have not an opportunity of examini g any fpeci- men of the Tlafcallan language, in order to afcertain this point, with fome degree of certaint/. Page liii. " The Natchez." 1 am not certain that I know the meaning of the word Natchez. In the year 1791, an In- dian interpreter informed me, that the word Natchee (as he pronounced it) fignifies " light-wood," or a kind of pine from which tar is procured. As thefe Indians had fo remark- ably preferved the religion of fire, it is not improbable that the word had fome relation to their fyftcm. Perhaps, the fire was principally kept np by pine- wood. The fame inter- preter faid, it is certain that the Natchez came from the weft fide of the Miffifippi. I take this to be the nation fo fre- quently called Naguatez by GarciUaffo de la Vega, and by the anonymous Portuguefe writer. Pa■ M^^ 'C-cans. not founa in me icugJ^^ge^ 01 i.-c i-cid.._. .-, .v-e.., » '-I. S penes mc. t •'f''- H ckeweMtr. 5.% ,o APPENDIX. Chippewas and Meflifaugers. It is clofely allied to the Narraganfet-dialeft preferved by Roger Williams. Indeed, it feems probable, that Williams often blended the Natick with the Narraganfet. Page Ix. " Ohio and Sufquehanna are not Delaware words." Notwithftanding what I have here faid, it is certain, that Sufquehanna is a Delaware word. The Wunaumeeh. one of the families of the Lcnni-Lennape, call this river, Secs-koo-haun-neak, which fignifies the muddy ftream, or river. In this language, Seelkoo is mud, and Ilanria, or Haun- neak, a river. " All the more favage nations of North-America were wanucrers." Speaking of the fouthern Indians, Lawfon fays, " Ana to this day, they are a fliifting. wandering people ; for 1 know fome Inaian nations, that have changed their fet- tlemeni?, many hundred miles ; fometimes no !efs than a thou- fand, as is proved by the Savanna Indians, who formerly lived on the banks of the MefT.ifippi, and removed thence to the head of one of the rivers of Soaih-Carolina s fince which, (for fome diflike) mod of them are removed to live in the quarters of the Ircquois or Sinnagars, which are on tke heads of the rivers that difgorge themfelves into the Bay of Chffa- feaif." It would be eafy to f.:ow, by many other inftan- ces, the extexifive wanderings of our Indians, through the continent. It is not ncceflary to inquire, in this place, into the various circumllances which have impelled them to tra- verfe fuch immenfe portions of territory. Caprice fometimes, but much more frequently tlie neceflities of their condition, have led mankind to migrate. Perhaps, the ravages of tyrants, more than any other individual tircumftance, have difpcrfed nations over the earth. Thus the Gipfiesare fujipofed to have been impelled out of Indoftan, by the arms of Tamcrl.me. J lerfuaded, that iiuny of the northern tribes of America f A new Voyage to Camlina, &c.p . i;o a:ij i/I . r allied to the ,ms. Indeed, it le Natick with not Delaware lid, it is certain, he Wunaumeeh, call this river, iddy ftream, or Hanm, or Haun- h- America were IS, Lawfon fays, idering people ; langed their fet- !efs than a thou- :, who formerly moved thence to a s fince which, d to live in the are on tke heads le Bay of Chefa- ny other inftan- ins, through the this place, into led them to tra- fiprice fomctimes, ■ their condition, avages of tyrants, ;, have difpcrfed fujipofed to have ,s of Tamerlane, ribcs of America APPENDIX. were driven from the borders of Mexico, by the fuccelTes of Cortez. We are. I think, about to contemplate an immenfe change in the geographical lituation of our tribes. They feem incapable of profpering in the neighbourhood of the whites, efpecially of the enterprifmg Anglo-Americans. They will leave the territories of the United-States, and retire, per- haps to begin new confederacies of war, '.nd conqueU, to the vail countries beyond the Miflilippi. This is an event which will, perhaps, take place at no very remote period of time. I forbear to fpeculate upon its confequences. They will be interefting. It is not likely that they will have any great effedl upon the growing nations eaft of the Miffif.pp. ; but they will materially affeA the favage nations beyond the great ri- ver and they may afFeft the fettlements of Europeans in that quarter of our continent. 1 have conjeftured, that the nations of the Delaware ftock were more remarkable for their wan- derings than «' thofe of the Huron, Cheerake, »nd other races " I could adduce many fafts that would not a little favour this idea. Though the Iroquois (I mean the Five- Nations) carried their fuccefsful arms through trads of country of many hundred miles in extent, they neverthelefs, for a great length of time, continued their improvements nearly in the fame diftrias of the continent. The Oneidas, who gloried in diftur'ing the repofe of the fouthern tribes, and who ap- pear to have been principally inllrumental in bringing the Tufcaroras to their neighbourhood, (liU d. ell witn.n a few n,iles of the very fpot where their imperfed ftory firft be- gins. It is not twenty years fince the greater part of the Cayuga-nation moved from the vicinity of the C.yuga-Lake, ,.here they were firft difcovered. A great part of the Senecas ftill occupy their ancient territories. With , refpeft to the Cheerake, though the Delawares feem to have called them the » Wanderers," they have long refided in the fame di Iridof ■ country. The fame may be faid of the Creeks, Chikkafab, h I I ( *. • 3 and 171. ,2 APPENDIX, and Choktah. But few of the Delaware nations have been fta- tionary, and wherever we pu(h our inquiries, we difcover traces of thefe nations and their languages. A nation called the Monfinie,, and another called the Mattafms are fald to re- fide in the vicinity of Hudfon's Bay. Both of thefe nations are doubtlefs Delaware. Monfonies are the nation, or a part of them, whom we call Monfees ; and the word Mattajfm fig- nifies in the language of the Monfees. a tobacco-pipe, or per- haps rather the bowl of the pipe. In a letter to me, dated February the 26th of the prefent year, Mr. Heckewelder fays, " laft fummer while at Mulkingum, an Indian who vi- fited us, told us, that fome of the nation (Delawares) which had travelled, not long fmce. far up the Miffouri-River, met with real Delawares. wno fpoke their lansruage," I believe, the Aflinipoils, or Afliniboih, who refide beyond Lake Supe- rior, fpeak a dialed of the Delaware language. The word Aftnmpoil is certainly a Delaware -ord. It fignifies they?««3 have been fta- wc difcover nation called ire fald to re- F thefe nations n, or a part of Mattajfin fig- j-pipe, or per- to me, dated , Heckewelder ndian who vi- iwares) which iri-River, met ;," I believe, nd Lake Supe- ge. The word ;nifies the Jlanii- ;s, it fliould be (lock have not the Oiher races '. be completely IS have a much any other. etter F is to be ." This letter, e of our tribes if the true Dela- f certain Indians Vlivimis, Farnnfiti be deftitute of \ Mr. Colcfworthy. the V. But I find this letter in the language of the Acadtans. who call the lips. A.*..^ and the bark of \^^^^'f' ^^ ll. Aninfpeaion of ti. vocabularies w I read y- vince the re.der. that the Acadians fpeak a d,aleft of the Ian guage of the Lenni Lcnnape. Page Ixiv. According to Sir WiHi.un Jo^'f-'/^^^;^":"!! and P do not occur in the language of the -"federates cm th-v fays this gentleman, pronounce then, bu wUh the l^rdlillty". 'The M occur, very frequently .n m.^of the dialeas of the Delaware flock. Should U n° ^e foun . in -inv inlhnce. in the dlalcfts of the confederates, it would ;rtot :tanefl.ntialdi.ercncebetween thefe langua^ {^th feof the Delawares. But I have ^l-dy rem. ed that the prefence or the abfencc of any letter in a language ppe nfe to be a matt.r of Ids confequence than . conv m'mgined. The Wyandots. whofe language ..un- Lbtcd, radically the fame as that of the S.x-nauons, make ufe of the letter M. Thus, Mintah i. red in the.r anguag ,t alfo occurs in the language of the Hochclagenfes. the affiuuy of which to that of the confederates will b. obvrous from an infpedUon of my vocabularies. In this language. A^ueh^ » man. It occurs in the languajes of the Naudow.ffies. Chee- rake, Mufkohge, Ivatahba, and many other tr.bes. Wuh tef- pea to the letter P, I mutt obferve that it often occurs .u the language of the Naudoweffies. who are nearly related to the Confederates. In this language, P^.W- is the fun. and .re ; and Ha^^a^na^, young. It occurs in the language of the Canellogas, who fpeak a dialeft of the Cunda ; rn u.at of tnc ^.uikohte. who(. lans.u,e i-ertainl, ra icaUy the la. that of the Tufcaroras, a:ui o; courie radtca.ly the fame a, t...t of the confederates ; and in that of the Ch.crak.. wh.ca u not • Pc l.att. i4- ,4 APT E N D 1 X. fodifFerent from the dialers of the Six-Nations as has been commonly imagined. In addition to thefc oircumftances, which perhaps tend to (how, that authors have laid toe much ftrefs upon the prefence and abfencc of particular letters, I may obferve, that both the M, and the P, often occur in fomc ofthofe very Afiatic languages of which we Uifcover uncqui- voc.il veIHges in the di ledh of the confederates. Thus, they both occur in the languages of the Pirfians, the Kouriltzi, the Kittawini, &c. Mr. Pyrlsus fays that (bcfidcs the M and the P) the language of the I-ivc-Nations is deftitute of the letters F, and V. But the F is certainly found in fome of the dialec'ts of the confederacy. It occurs in that of the Mohawks, who call waver Auf-na-ca-nus. I have already remarked, that this letter is common in the language of the Mufkohge, Chikkafah, and other tribes. From the affinity of thefe to the Tufcarora, and from the affinity of this to the other dialcds of the confederacy, it is not probable that the F is warning in the language of the Five-nations. I do not find the V in any of thefe dialefts. But the W, fo finiilar to it, is common in the dialefts of the Oneidas, Cayugas, Tufcaroras, &c. The language of the Senecas is thought to be more fono- rous and more majeftic than that of any other tribe in the con- federacy. It is alfo, 1 think, lefs guttural. The Mohawk dialeft appears to be the moft poliflied. The dialeft of the Oneidas is faid to be the fofteft ; " becaufe, fays one writer, thev have more vowels, and often fupply the place of harfti letters with liquids^*". This, I believe, is partly true; but this wi iter falls into a midake in afferiing, that inftead of R, the Oneidas •' always" ufc L. I h:ive fliown the contrary in a former part of this work f. Tr.=' Mohawks, as well as the Oneidas, make frequent ufe of the L. • The Reverend Mr Si)eiicer, in SmUh's Miftory of the I'covincc of New- York, p. 5.5- t See rreiiminary Difcourft, p, Uiii. 5 as hns been oircumftances, : laid toe much ular letters, I I occur in fome cover unequi- s. Thus, they : Kouriltzi, the i the M and the te of the letters : of the dialed? lawks, who call that this lettef :hikkafah, and Tufcarora, and he confederacy, mguage of the ' thefe dialefts. s dialefts of the be more fono- ribe in the con- Thc Mohawk le dialeft of the ays one writer, l)!ace of harlh ar:ly true; but at inftead of R, the contrary in s, as well as the of the I'covinrc of N J) I X. Of all the American languages that arc known to me, that of tin- TuCcaroras fceins to be the mod barbarous, and the moll diffic.ih of acquilition. I have, at leall. found it m.rc dilliculc to write this language than any of tl e others. It is extremely guttural and nafal. Clavi- gero's charafter of the language of the Otomies, one of the mod ancient rations of tl.c Mexican empire, applies intimately to that of ihe Tufcaroras. •' Their language, fays thi^ author, i. very uiiii.ult and full of afpirations. which tl>ey make partly in the throat, p.rtly in the nofe ; but other- wile ic ii fufficicntly copioas and expreffive*." l'.;rhaps, u is rckrvcd for fom*; future inquirer to difcover, that the language of the Tufcaroras is nearly allied to that of tlic Oto- mic°. "it !ias ben faid, that " except the Tufcarora-, all the Six-Nations fpcak a language radically the fanief." The moil faperfidal exii'iiinaiion of my ':omparutlve Vocubularia w-"l convince the reader, that the languigc of the Tufiaiora;; is radically the fame as that of the oiiier brandies of the con- federacy. I inull remark, howsver, that it feems very proba- ble, tha fiiite tlicii- eml;;r.'tion from Carolina tlie Tufcaroras have borrowed from tiie language of the Five-nations, parti- cularly from thediikck uf the Oiitidab, with whom they have had the moll conueflion. 1 have been of opinion, that it is eafier to acquire a know- ledgeof theDjlawar.-l.inguage.andof the dialedls moll nearly related to it, fuch as that of the Mahicanni, Miamis, &:c. than it is to acquire a knowledge of the dialeds of Mie Six-Na- tions. I advanced this opinion in the former c i.'on of this work, and 1 do not yet find fufacient reafcn to rcl uiuilh it. The contrary opiuijn, however, has been advanced by foine • The Hidory of M-^xico, vnl.i. p. lo). t The Rtvcrcnd M.-. PiKiKcr, in S.uith'-i Hifiory of t!ic .'Vovlnce of New-York, p. 52. 1 ,6 A I' P !•- N D I X. perfons who have liad p erhaps, much belter opportunities of in- quiring into the matter, than myfclf. " The hnguagc of ths Iroquois, fays Lofkid, appears more e.ify to be learned, than ih.Jtoftl.c DcUwarcs*." The fame remark was made to me by the Reverend Mr. jolin Sergeant, the prcfent worthy milhonary amon^ the SiockbriJge-lndians in the vicinity of Ontiaa. 1 believe, it as certain, that the dialcds of the Iro- quois arc more reducible to the rules of grammar than the dia- kds of the Dclawares. Rut this does not, I think, prove that the former are more eafy of acquifuion th.m the latter. The mifs of mankind IcarnKinguagcs without paying any attention to their grammaticaHlruaure. Indeed, languages the moll ir- regular iaihcir llrudure arc fometimes learned with peculiar facility. -. rage I.VV. " Of the Erigas I ki.ow but little." Gar- cillallb de la Vega mentions JJirrga. or Hirrihigua, as a province in llorida, and obfcrves that the capital of the pro- vince and the cacique bore the fame namcj . In the map an- nexed to the Trench tranllation of the work, the province of 1-Iirriga is pl.aced in the Pcninfula of Eaft-Florida. This may polViWy have been the nation of the Erigas. Be this as it may, 1 have long bjcn pcrfuaded. that feveral of the northern American tribes migrated from the countries of Florida, &c. Lewis Evans fays, that fome of the Erigas have been " ;ncor- poratedinto th. Senccas." I do not doubt that Evans was well informed as to this (".■.cl. But none of the northern Indians whom I have examined on the fubjed could give me any in- formation confer. .ing this tribe. " There is, f.iys Sir William Johnfon, fo remarkable a dif- ference in the h.nguagc of the Six Nations from all others, as affordj ground for enquiring into their dinind origin. The nations "North of the St. Laurence, thofe Weil of the great ♦ Pirt I. p. i\- t Hiftoirt dc la Co\'.'\\',i^c Cx. ial'orlilc, &c. torn I. p. 42, srtuniticsof in- ;ingu;igc of th-' e learned, than as made to me ircfcnt worthy the vicinity of :ds of the Iro- \r than the dia- ink, prove that he latter. The g any attention iges the moll ir- 1 with peculiar It little." Gar- Jirrihigua, as a ital of the pro- In the map an- he province of •ida. This may le this as it may, af the northern ofl'lorida, &C. re been " !ncor- that Evans was northern Indians give me any in- cmarkable a dif- jm all others, as lil origin. The Veil of the great om 1. p. 42. A I' P E N D I X. 17 ,.kes. with f,e few who inhabit the fca coads of New-F.ng- ' and thofe again wha live about the Ohio, notw.thiland^ n7therefpcaivediaancc, between them, ipc.k a language e„ one another: while the Six Nations who hve tl c m cfthem. arc incapable of convey.ng a fingk tdea to the.r neighbours, nor can they pronounce a word ot '-^ -'J^f^ with correancfs.- h i. true, that the languag u the Six-Nation, is widdy diflcrent from the duleihof the l.ela- ware,, Chi;,,cwa., and other nation,, whom (»- J-;^-;- fake) I have called nations of the " Delaware- llock. \ cr- haps, it i, not eafy to point out any language, wh.ch are more difvant from each other than thefe. We are capable, however, of difcovering affinities between them ; in the lame manner a. Profeffor Pallas finds fome affinity between the languages that arefpokenon Mount Cauc.tfus and the dialeds ot the bemo ' The annexed table is intended to point out fome of the af- finities of the Dclaw.ares and Six Nawoiw. . Tranfaaions of the Royal Society, vol. 63 l-on^icl fays " the Dcla- Uwarc language bear, no rcrc.nl.:ancc to .he ho.uo... ' 1 art 1. p. .8. t The LiBgux Cau.jl., as i'alla, call, .hcn.. ar. .ylvc in nu.l.r, ,„; arc ali nic-cUin the c.-rieof n,y worW. They are aC.na.ca by U>c Tu^bcrs from ,0. 'o ... iaclu.we. " Qu.uun.v.s fays the profcfTor Iakin« of thde .an,ua8.,a rcliquia o.nnibu. bngu. dueri. v.deB.ur, Sla .amen hinc inde a.r.,.i.a. haru.n ae.ue ae l.efy.cnl.um a....eaorun, Z S.™,W;c. lingua occur,!., o,.. cuam in.ermon.,cola. jug, nuer .■ . .e- namctMoo£oliamUm.roi.hieum«iguadevia..onefapere,i. /-,c«.r«« „cpleafed.ofind-.he.a„,u.gcs, at lead fragn.cn., of .he lansuage. of .hcfe Caucaf.an .nbcs in bo.h Nor.h and Soutn-AnurK-a. Of all .he Cancafian tribe-. I .hinU there is n. one vvho^. langua ,e appear. ,0 be moreftrikinglyprefervcd in Amcrici, tl.a.i that of the K.rtai.n . )• A P P F, N D 1 X. In this tabic, under the general head of Delaware- (lock, I h.-.ve introduced the words of the Dclawares properly fo called, and ofthcChippcwas, F'ottawatamch, and other tribes who unequivocally fpeak dialefts of the Delaware language. By referring to the comparative vocaiularUs, it will always be eafy to difcovcr by what tribe each word is fpokcn ; for all the words in this table occur in the vocabularies. The reader will readily obferve, that thefc aflinities are nei- ther numerous nor very ftriking. But let it be rccolledled. that in order todifcover the affinities of languages very ample vo- cabularies of them (liould be carefully examined. To fuch vo- cabularies, 1 have not always had actefs ; and moreover, my leifure has not been fuch as to admit of my devoting as much of my time to the fubjeft as I could wilh. 1 am perfuaded, however, that the refult of an cxtenfive inquiry will be, that there are many affinities between the languages in queftion. After all, I muft confefs, that at prefent. my principal argument in favour of the notion, that the lan- guages of the Six-Nations, and thofe of the tribes of the De- lawarc-Ilock, are derived from a common origin is deduced from an inveftigation of the(e languages in Afia, and in Eu- rope, particularly in Afia. Examining the queftion in this point of light, there vill, I think, remain no doubt on the fubjeft. Thus, to illuftrate my pofuion by a few examples : we find theCurdi* words for leaf, bread, earth or land, and many others, in the dialefts of the Delawares ; and we find the Iroquois words for wife, &c. in the language of the fame « When I lay that we find the Curdi or any other Afiitic word» for any particular objcas, *cc. in the languages of America, I do not mean to in- finuatr, that thcfe words arc preciftly the fame. I mean, that the re- femWanccs between them arc fo great, that there can be no doubt, that the words of the one have fpruiig from thofe of the other. . ,^, ,, p P E N D I X. »9 clawareftock, I operly fo called, ithcr tribes who language. By will always be jlccn ; for all the aflinitics arc nei- ! recolle£led,that s very ample vo- •d. To fuch vo- id moreover, my levoting as much I am perfuaded, inquiry will be, \e languages in at prefent, my in, that the Ian- tribes of the De- rigin is deduced ^fia, and in Eu- queftion in this 1 no doubt on the a few examples : arth or land, and 3; and we find the iiage of the fame Afiatic nation. We find the Tounguf.an words for ilar, in the dialers of the Mohawks, Onondagos. and other nations of the confederacy. There are many words of this Afiat.c nation .n the l.nnguages of the Delaware tribes. See the articles water. Sec I (hall not. at prefent, purfue this fuhjcft any farther. Hy a careful infpettion of the vocabularies, the reader w.ll find no difficulty in difcovering, that in Afu tl.c languages of the con- federate, and the languages of the tribes of the Delaware- lock may be all traced to one common scource. Nordo H.mU thisobfervaiiontothe languages of the American tribes juft mentioned. It will be eafy to trace the languages of the Chee- rake. Mufkohge. Chikkafah, Choktah. and even thofe of the Mexicans, the Peruvians, the Chilefe, and many other nations, both in North and in South- America, to the fame fources from whence have fprung the languages of the confederates and De- lawares. The inference from thcfe fafts and obfervat.ons .s obviousand interefting: that hitherto, we have not DISCOVERED MORE THAN ONE RADICAL I. A . O U AOE . N T H K TWO AMERICAS: OR. .N OrHER WORDS, THAT HITHERTO WE HAVE NOT DISCOVERED IN AMERICA ANY TWO, OR MORE. U.NOUAOES BETWEEN WHICH WE ARE INCAPABLE OP DE- TECT.NO AFFINITIES (AND THOSE OFTEN VERY STRIK.No) UJTHER IN AMERICA, OR IN THE OLDWORLO*. • See the Preliminary Dlfcourfe, page*. >""'»> "<=■ j;; Afinttc words for auy , I do not mean toin- Imean, that the rf- an be no doubt, that other. .' ,„ . , / „ I so APPENDIX. i 'A ■•J 2 1 -s P- (J - *j rj , ^, H «J C JJ c 1 u cr .*•_■ n •' = o u J^ « . C -^ •>- < w + Kes-nuch-fa-keh, in the dialed of the Cochnewagoes. \\ The Wyandott call the Sun and Moon, Yaundecfliaw, and the Stars, Teefhoo. , y -Si S ??; S -^ U! UJ II Mo r: s c OO w 1 en § "S u ^ .r: o JS 5 5^ a " .a o 1 s| - . o ■§ .I* — J3 9 o 1 r :=, t. CO w 4 'If 1 rl --• "^ 1 an 55 &• § § e u CO ° ^ . O O u oo .a rt 1 M "-J 2 1- s S 1? 1 Si q! C k C -3 . ^ ■ < < -* t,, 2 -^ « o iM. 1^ c .i? sH x c^ 51 u: ►- ■JH. 13 a si" •^ 2 If APPENDIX. »« Pagelxvu. .'None of the writers that I have confuW uJ difcovcrcd any affinity between the anguage of Lcheerake and that of the Six-Nauons." Loflc.e fays. .. the Cherokeeo fpeak a compound of the Shawanofe. Iro- quois. Huron, and others*." My fpecimen of the language of the Cheerake is by no means extenfive. It js. however, fufficientlycxtenfive to convince me, that the Ch.erake lan- guage is not radically dtfF.rent from that of the S-xNatjons Low find many words common to the languages o the Muf- kohge or Creeks and the Cheerake. We (hall immed.ately fee that the affinities between the Creek and Tufcarora language are very ftriking. fo that in this way. independently of others .c fhow that the Cheerake language is not radically different from that of the Six-Nations. ,^ . n .;w v. . " 'r Paeelxviii "I find fome affinity between the language of the Muflcohge and that of the Onondagos. The former call the ear Iftehuchtiko : the latter Olnub,a." Other re em- blances may be pointed out. The Onondagos call fled., O..- ,hra: the Mufkohge, Aupiff.auh. Purfu.ng tlm fubjeO^ t ^^iUl think appear obvious, that the language of the Muf- kohge is not Radically diu.rent from that of the ^-Nat.ons, It is almoa univerfally allowed, that the language ofthe Fufca- ,oras is radicallv the fame as that of the other mbes m the con- federacy. Now 1 (lull be able to fhow, that the Tu(caroras fpeak a language radically the fame as that of the Creeks, Ch.kkalah. and Choktah. The Creeks call the moon, Neethleeh.Ha(hfeh: the Tufcaroras, H.tlbe-Neahah, or Hatffie-Nyahah ; and the Choktah, Halhe-Ncenak. The Creeks call water. O'wee- wauh, and IVa^'.-a : the Tufcaroras, vi-xvoo, Auweah, Auweau. &c. The former call fleili, Aupiffwauh ; the latter. Owau- ghreh. The Tufcaroras call a River, Kcenah. and Keenen : the Chikkafah, Okhennah ; the Choktah, Oakhenah. The common origin of the language of the Tufcaroras and that of • Ii;;lory t'f the Million uf the United Brethren, part i. i-. 20. ill' I — sa APPENDIX. the Creeks may even he difcovered in Afia. The firft of thefe nations call the foot, Aufcekeh, and Auchfee. I do not find that the Creeks have any word fimilar to this : but the Ta- weeguini call the foot by two names, viz. Top, and Afchta. The firft is a part of the Creek name, and the fecond is the Tufcarora name. Neither is it difficult to point out affinities between the languages of other branches of the confederacy and the languages of thefe fouthern tribes. The Onondago word for mother is Ifcfjte*. The Choktah word is Iflceh, or IJhke. The Cayugas call fnow, Okah : the Choktah, Oketeh. The Senecas call a river Kenondeah, and a creek Keneah. The Chikkafah and Chok'ah words, which are allied to thefe, have juft been mentioned. " It appears from different parts of Adair's Hijiory of the American Indians, that there are fome words common to the language of the Cheerake and Muflcohge." Moft of the per- fons whom 1 have confultcd with refpeft to the languages of thefe tribes are of opinion, that they are radically different from each other. But this is not the cafe. The Cheerake call water, Aiv-wa : the Creeks, O'weewauh and ffeeiva. The farmer call wood, /itioh and Attah : the latter Etoh. The former call a wife, If'ivjah : the latter Chauhiwauh. Page Ixix. While this edition was in theprefs, the arrival of two Katahha Indians in Philadelphia afforded me an oppor- tunity of collet^tinga fmall fpecimen of their language. This language is, certainly, radically the fame as the Delaware (fee the words, Weeyoos and Weedee-youh for flefli ; Wunipaky Miftiflieepauquau and Eeapauh, for leaf; ZJ^s and Dee-hauh for heart, &c.) But the Katahba is related to other American languages, viz. to the Woccon (fee the words for water, dog, &c.): to the Cheerake (fee the words for bread, wife or wo- man) ; and to the Muflcohge : fee the words for nofe. Its affinity * Fvrl.Tiiii. i».- A'- A P P E N D I X. rhefirftofthefe I do not find s: but the Ta- !>/>, and Afchta. e fecond is the int out affinities the confederacy The Onondago ord is Iflceh, or loktah, Oketeh. creek Keneah. E allied to thefe, 's Jlijlory of the common to the kloft of the per- he languages of licaily different le Cheerake call Weevja. The :ter Etoh. The iwauh. fs, the arrival of 1 mc an oppor- mguage. This le Delaware (fee flelh ; Wunipak, ? and Dee-hauh other American for water, dog, ad, wife or wo- nofe. Its affinity to other / irrican languages will be difcovered by an tnfpec- tionof ^ cabularies. I muft not omit, however, to remark, that the ...^hba and Mexican ^vords f^or the hair of the head havefomeaffinitytoeachother. In the language of the former. u is Nee-fkonfee ; in that of the latter it is l^ontli. Adair fays «' iJ/ is the favourite period." of the Katahba • I have not obferved this in the fpecimen which I have colleded. Ri. Ree. and Reeh. are the terminations of many words m the language of the Tufcaroras. Paee Ixix. " I am much at a lofs to know to which of the American languages, the language of the Woccons has the tit ft affinity." 1 now find, that there is an evident affinity £ "en the language of this tribe and thatof the Tufcaroras notwithftanding Lawfon's alTertion that there is but one word common to the two languages. In the language of the Woc- cons. IVaurraupa; and in the language of the Tufcaroras. tVare- ,cca is white. The former call the numeral nine. Jfahen;±c latter. Pyearah. There is alfo an evident, and perhap. greater, affinity between the language of the Woccons and That of the Creeks. In the former. Tauta, and in the lat- ter. Chauda, is red. In the former. 2W...A«. and m the latter Luftcftee is black. There is fome affinity between t e dialeas of the Woccons and Cheerake. The former call bread. Ik.ttau, the latter Ka. too. There is certainly a. I have iuft obferved, an affinity between the language of the Woccons and Katahba. The former call a dog. luuhhe, the latter Taunifee : the former call water £>«. the latter £yau. Page Ixx " It is greatly to be regretted, that wefhould be fo ignorant as we are of the language of the Natchez.'' My friend Mr. William Bartram informs me, that he was told, V > • Page SS- " \ »4 APPENDIX. by the traders, thit tlie language of the Natchez is nearly al. lied to the dialefts of the MufKohge, Chikkafah, and Chok- tah. Late inquiries have led me to believe that this is the taie. Adair feems to fiy, that the Natchez word for water is Ooka.* This isalmoll exaftly the word (according to the fame author) in the language of the Chikkafah. The Choktah call water, Okah. . , «' I am not certain that I have difcovered any affinity be- tween the language of the Mexicans .and that of any of ihc other American nations." The words for father in the lan- guages of the Mexicans, Poconchi, and Darien-lndi.ins. (how that there is fome atfinity betweei thefe languages. See the yocahularies. There is fome affinity between the languages of tl:e Six-Nations and Hurons and that of the Mexicans. Bro- ther, in the dialedl of the Senccas, is Tcototeken. In the Mexican language it is 2Ioj«/V/^/«/V-&. The Naudoweffies call the ears, Nookah; and the Mexicans Nacaztti. The words for daughter (Netouch and Teuchpoch) in the languages of the Acadians and Mexicans ; and the words for hair (Nee-flconfee and Tzoniii) in the language of the Katahba and Mexicans, feem to fhow that there are affinities between them. After all, the refemblances between thefe languages, as far as 1 have hitherto had an opportunity of examining them, are very in- confiderable ; and I ftill think, " it may be faid, with fome degree of fafety, that if there are in America two or more ra- dical languages, the Mexican is one of them." That the Mexican language, however, is not radically different from the languages of many other American trib-s is, I think, a point which may be demonllrated in a very fatisfadory man- ner: I mean by an examination of the fources of thefe lan- guages in Afia. We (hall here find, that the language of Montezuma may be traced to the languages of thePerfians, the • Page 1 73, in the note. chez is nearly al. afah, and Cholt- at this is the taie. r water is Qoku.* the fame author) )iitah call water, i any affinity be.- hat of any of ihe "ather in the lan- ien-lndians, (how guages. See the the languages of Mexicans. Bro- ototehcn. In the NaudoweiTies call . The words for anguages of the hair (Nee-flconfee a and Mexicans, them. After all, , as far as 1 have lem, are very in- faid, with fome a two or more ra- lem." That the ly different from ics is, I think, a fatisfadory man- irces of thefe lan- the language of )f thePerfians, the A P P E N D I X. 2S - • u T'.^for. tlie VoTOuHtchi, and other r,^^•A\ the Arabs, the Tartars, tne v o^^uuii . ^:;,fom whence .« derived conMerablc p»uons of ^e ?r«lsof- >»8»'8 ,he Af,..ic,. The Mexican, cal. a m, T.f. and /^ • jhe Ta„a,., 9». T.f,. and .he Tnrk. («ho - J"" >>' ^^ and D.„ : .he Pcrf.ans a,.d .he Cn.di, T.h .he A. .... M- tX .«.. are ver, ariUing, -m '-^>.^;^^„^- ,W.he m,«;. of .he Mexicans i. compounded of the I'f J-" i , .hTx .k.and Ta,.ar,. .he 71/of.heF.,fi.n.andC.r. d^ and .he T.,! of .he Arab.. Again. *= Me"-' - „;.„. .,/. in .h. iangnage "f'^^J j;;^;'f go'.ii^ht Arel. The Mexicans call a houfe. Led.,, tne vog ioKol- 67. Koella; and 68. W- Tne Mexxcans cdl le'mo n I W' •• the Lefghis, 50. ,U,z,Moou: the kuf- themoon, JW«*"' ^ The Mexicans call the hand, ha.ibb-Abiffinian.U3.A^. ^^j^^j; ,,^,,3, Mau ^.c. Maytl: the Armenians, 107, call the g i .»,P Altekefick-Abiffinian, 112, -nM^'''«- ^ "^ and the AlteKcuv.^ ^ , „. , r„rA\ n-i 7k ee: the cans call the fingers. M^V^^^^^^ and Pelga/ch. Ihe ^^ ^^^ Kabardinian- Mexicans .s Ce^ m he g Z ^^^ ^^^^^ ^^.^. .^^ Tcherkeffi, U » Ze I coul P ^^ ^.^ ^^^^^ Thefe will be ^°'^^^'''\'['Zli ClL^ro. which has 1 ui» oflVrfion of the learneu v-iavigtjw, the remarkable ^'f""°^;* , ^,^ ,if,,,ery of more ftr-k- already been taken "°"" "f. ^f .h^ Mexican, and ing affinities between the language M See Preliminary Cifcourfe, p. »»>>• i '• O i I lif 26 APPENDIX. the languages of the Afiatics than we are capable of difcovcring betvveea the language of the Mexicans and many American tribes, is a circumftancc extremely in- tcreaing, and difficult to account for. I will not haz- ar-l a conjeaure on the fubjeft. 1 will, however, obferve again (for the remark has already been made*), that there feem to be good grounds for afferting, that many of the lan- guages of America, which can be (hewn to be radically the fame, have loft more of their parental refemblances than the Aflatic languages, that are radically the fame, have done. This remark, at leaft, applies to thofe Afiatic languages from which the languages of America appear to be more efpccially derived. Pages lxx,lxxi. " The Poconchi or Pocoman language appears to have but little conneftion with any of the North- American dialefts." There is fome affinity between this lan- guage and that of the Katahba. In the former, a dog is cal- led Tfi: in the latter, Taun-fee, or Taun-tfee. There is alfo fome affinity between this Poconchi word, and the word for the fame objeft in the language of the Onondagos, viz. Tfchierha\. See likewife the words for bird in thefe lan- guages. There is fome affinity be> ween the I'oconchi and the Choktah. In the former. In, and in the latter, Inno is the pronoun I, myfelf. Page Ixxii. " Time has not effaced every refemblance be- tween the language of certain Brafilians and that of fome of the tribes of North-America." " The language of the Chilefe bears fomeaffinity to thofe of fome of the tribes of North- Ame- rica." It would be eafy to conftruft a large table of the affini- i • Preliminary DIfcourfe, p. ic. ■« •t This is, doubt icfs, a compounded word. The laft fillable, tria.U ■early the fame as the Cntida »nd Ccchntwago word* for dog, viz. Irhar- A P P E N D I X. re capable of Vlexkans and extremely in- will not haz- vevcr, observe :*), that there ny of the lan- e radically the lances than the le, have done, languages from more efpccialljr 3man language of the North- itween this lan- r, a dog is cal- Thers is alfo I the word for londagos, viz. d in thefe lan- Dconchi and the ter, Inno is the refemblance be- lt of fome of the ! of the Chilefe of North- Ame- ble of the afiini- ift tillable, er!ia,'\* ord» for dog, viz. L 1 ,„p nf the tribes of North and thcfe of ties between the language, ot the triocs • , a. , , . ThUl (balK'o at fome future period. At South-America. 1 hib 1 Ihali .o -ru. Civ u^as call prcfent. 1 fhall mention a few of them. 1 he Cay... s c Trun and moon. Gau-.uau : ^^^'^ ^^^^'I^M^-'^-g " '^°- H„a) call the plane., C... The N-dowcfl,c. c.^ a " OW. AW..- the Chilei.-. M-«, and Mao,.. The kau >ba call a hill. SooU-Taro: .h. BraniianscaU a mounta. «^ Certain Indians of New-England (according to Wood) .1 he head. Be,.,.o. and the Woccons of Carolina. Popp.:^ Jaioi, 4.- the Galibis, O.p.,ou. S.C. In the J-S-ge of the Creeks, .^^ is the Tea. a lake, or a great nvcr fhe fe- ^uvian name for a river is P.!.. U mull be confe.fed. however. ■ that the differences between the North and South American languages are very great. This circumftance leads me tocon- eale' tlut an inimenfe length of ti.ehas elapf.d fince there fubfUled any extcnfiveintercourfe between tne tribes of thefe two portions of the new-world. either in America, or mthe countries of the old-world. Pagelxxii. " Of the language of the Peruvians. I cannot form any certain judgment." I ha.e difcovered very Hriking affinities between the Peruvian language and the languages of difFerenttribesoftheold-world.Befidestheintereftingaftinities which will be feen in the vocabularies, under the heads of tifti. and Bone, I may here mention fome others One of the Pe- ruvian names for God was V.ra-Coc/.a. KooUha, Kcouhaee..^ Koot are the words for God. in the language of the people of Kamtchatka. In arranging the Afiatic l-g^^S" ^""^'^"S^" their affinities. Profeffor Pallas has placed the dialedls of the Kamtchadals immediately above the language of the Japanefe Now there are fome very ftriking refemblanccs between the Uplefe and Peruvian languages. In the fir il ot thefe lan- guages. Cann is the name for God. &c. P../..-C...C was L Peruvian name. In the Peruvian. Wv fignifics valiant. 2S APPENDIX. In the Japancfe, 5//; is a God, an !mmort;ii foul, &c. T Peruvians call a year, liuata : the Olliaks, 71, Hoei. The former call the ftar Venus, Chu/cn : the fame OlUaks call a liar, C/jccf. Here, I muft obfervu, tiiat it h between the Olliak and Peruvian words for bcnv-, that the greucft rcicmbljnces are to be found. I (hull couciuJe t.us fubjeftby re a.irliing, that notwithftanding thefuperior eultivatioa of tm; Peruviuns, wc have no reafonto fuppofc, that they ha*^^ had a different origin from many other tribes and nations in America. ♦ Pagelxxxi. " The Japonians, or Jiiponeefe." 1 have no hefuationin confidering the Japancfe as one of the nations >vho have contributed to the peopleing of America. My principal argument for this notion is deduced from the affinities which I have difcovered between the language of thjfe p >ple, and the languages of feveral American tribes, particularly the Mufkohge or Creeks, the Chikkafah, the Choktah, the Tuf- caroras, the Brafilians, and the Peruvians. Thus, the Japa- ncfe call a bone, Fone: the Creeks, Eefoonee. The Japancfe call a houfe, Chookoot/cho : the Chikkafah, Chookka. The Japancfe call a ftar, Phofchee and Fofi: the Choktah, Phitchek, and Phutchik. The Japancfe call the foot, /Ifchee, Akfet, and AJi : the Tufcaroras, Auchfee and Aufeekeh. Tlie Japancfe call rain. Ante : the Brafilians, /Imen. The Japancfe and Peru- vian affinities have juft been mentioned. Of all the North-Ame- rican tribes, the Creeks and the Tufcaroras feem to me to be the moft nearly allied to the Japancfe, not only by their lan- guage, but by their cuftoms, &c. Page Ixxxii. The Tfcegani, or Gipfies, 166, ought to have been mentioned among the number of the Afiatic tribes of whofe lan- guages we difcover veftigcs in America. See the article fire in the Vocabularies. Mr. Pallas and other writers have re- marked the great affinity of the language of the Gipfies to the dialeas of India. Gipfies are found in almoft every part of Huffia. " They have no fixed refidence, but wander con- 1 j1, &c. T , Hoet. The aks call a liar, ;n the Oiliak rci'cmbljnces ly rea.irliing, III! Pciuvi;ins, d a different icrica. ." 1 have no >e nations >vho My priOkiipal inities which I ; priple, and Tticularly the tah, the Tuf- »us, the Japa- The Japanefe . The Japanefe Phitchek, and Ikfee, and ^ ; Japanefe call lefe and Pe ru- le North-Ame- em to me to be y by their lan- ;ht to have been s of whofe lan- the article fire Titers have re- : Gipfies to the every part of t wander con- APPENDIX. n Unually fro. one place to another, and esercife the trade, of blackfmiths and farriers, and ho.fe-dealers. wh.ch lad hey generally doby exchanging inftcad of fcHins thcr horfcs. PUfchiif. p. 3^2- S« P^S*^ " °^J'''' Appendix. Page Ixxxv. After the D^gorri, I n^ould have placed the Hebrew,.8.;theJews.8.;theChaldean.83;;;^'^«y"-J 84; the Arabians. 85 •. and the .^nyruns. 87. ^-^^^^''f veftiges of the languages of all th.fe nations, ^o celebrate m the ancient annals of mankind ; fointereding to 'he hUlou n of the revolutions and fortunes of his fpecies. are to be found in the languages both of North and South- Amenca ! I Page Kxxvi. After the Yakouti. \ thould have named the Armenians, or people of Arme„ia. ,07. Coth in the voca- buiarie. and in tnis Appendix. I have mentioned fome Qr U ing refemblances bet. een the language of thefe people and the languages of certain Americans. p -re xclii " The Mahicanni have told me, that they cam. from 'ihe weft beyond the Great- River, or Miffif.ppi." From a circumllancelately communicated to me by C.juam lund^ rick a very intelligent Indian of the M.hican nation, u wou.d feem extremely probable, that thefe Indians in their m.gra- tion from the weft, after crofting theMiffif.ppi. had uniformly kept at a confiderable diftance from the fliores of the Atlantic Their tradition informs us, that in the whole of their progrefs thev had never feen the phenomenon of the ebbing and flowing of the tide, until they came to the North or Hudlon River. ;o which they gave the name of Mohunnuek, aname exprcJ.v. of the phenotnenon. Some of the northern tribes even prefcrve a tradition that they came from tl>e borders of tlie weftern fea. Chanevoix was informed, that both the Illinois and the M.amu came •« from the bordersof a feavery diftant to the weft.'"* , • \ Voyage, fiC. vol. ii. p. 170 ' , 30 APPENDIX. u r n r I' « -1' Page cvi. •• Mr. de Guignes," &c. Mr. de Guignes' me- moir is inferteJ in the twenty eighth volume of the Academy of Infcriptions and Bflles Lettrcs, for the year 1757, and is en- titled Recherches fur Ui Na-vigationi des Chinois, du ceti di f Ama-iqiie, k^ far quelques PeupUt fttuvi a /' ixt remit e Orient ale de /' jI/H. " From the concurrent teflimony of feveral an- rient Chincfe writers, he proves that their early navigators, af- ter having followed the Afiatic coaft towards the north as far as Kamt/ihaika, which they called Taban, crofltd the ocean in an eallerly dircAion, and at the diltance of 20,000 lis, or about 2000 miles, arrived nearly under the fame parallel at a country whicii they named Fou/ang; bding, according to thfm, the land where the fun rifes. This, continues Dr. Maty, from wliom the word-, in inverted commas are taken, muft have been the coaft difcovcred by tlie Kufil ins in 1741 ; and, from the new difcovcries, it may be inferred, that the Chinefe were direcled in that tra>n, by following the tourfe of the iflands." Jn account of the Nciv Northern Archipelago, lately difco'vered /y thu Rnjfians in the feus of Kamtfchatka and Anadir. By Mr. J. Von Stxhlin, &c. Preface, p. xiv. Englilh tranllation. London: 1774. Itis a circumftance which dcferves to be re- membered, that the Chinefe, according to Mr. de Guignes, made their voyage to America in the year 458 cf the vulgar era. I'he annals of the American nations do not afcend to ai remote a period as this. But the Toltecas, who are faid to have been the moft cultivated of all the tribes of the new-world, began their journey from the kingdom of Tollan, in the nor- thern parts of America, in the year 596. It is poflible that the Toltecas may have been the defcendants of the Chinefe men- tioned by the French writer. But this is, at beft, a very dif- tant conjeilure. We know very little of the Toltecas. Even their exiftence might be called in queftion by an hidorian fcru- puloufly attentive to matters of faft. Clavigero fays, that the Toltecas fpake the Mexican language. If fo, I think it ex- tremely improbible, tiut they (not doubting of their ex- iftence) were a Chinefe colony ; for the language of the Mexi- 1 A P p E N O I X- 81 de Guignes' me- of the Academy tr 1757, and is en- iHoii , du cete dt /* ttremite Orientate ny of feveral an- ly navigators, af- s the north as far oHi'd the ocean in of 20,000 lis, or ame parallel at a cording to thfm, s Dr. Maty, from ikcn, mud have 1741 ; and, from the ChintTe were ; of the ifliinds." I lately difcovered dnadir. By Mr. gli(h tranflation. Icferves to be re- Jr. de Guignes, ;8 cf the vulgar not afcend to as vho are faid to f the new-world, Man, in the nor- > poflible that the he Chinefc men- )eft, a very dif- Toltecas. Even in hidorian fcru- ro fays, that the , I think it ex- g of their ex- age of the Mexi- u can, appear, to h.ve very lUtle anini-.y .0 that of the Chinefc. I am rather inclined to believe, that the Toltccas were a colony from Japan. I think, however, that we are in poffcffion of a fufficient number of farts to make it probable, that the Chinefe have con- tributed to the peopling of America. Speaking of the b.oux. Charlevoix fays, " I have feen fome people who are pcrfuaded that thefe Savages had a Chinefe accent^•• Capta.n Carver vvhom I wi(h I could always quote with imphc.t confidence. fays."ManywotdsalfoareufedbothbytheChinefcandInd.ans. which have a refemblance to each other, not only m theu found but their fignification. The Chinefe call a flave. Jhnngo; and the Naudoweffic Indians, whofe language, from the.r lutle in- tercourfe with the Europeans, is the leaft corrupted, term a dog, Jhungujh. The former denominate one fpec.es of their tea.fhoufong; the latter call their tobacco, (houfaffau Many other of the words ufed by the Indian, contain the fyllable, che.chaw.andchu.afterthedialedof theChinefet." " The liatche, Indians, fays Boffu, had a temple, and a kind offer- vice ; in their language intelligent people have found Clunele wordsj." Our author does not inform ui what are the words. I (hall here mention fome of the affinities between the ChU nefe and certain American languages. Mr. Bell fays the Cht- nefe •' worihip one God. whom they call Tien, the Heaven or the higheft Lord."§ &c. The Kittawini, 164, call Heaven, Tain In our continent, the Hurons call Heaven. lo-nd,. TheChilefe call the moon. Tien, the very word which the Chinefe apply to Ged. &c. The Natchez call fire, Oua : the Chinefe Choa. The Chinefe call the earth, T,ye: the kitta- wini 164, To. The Chilefe, Tue. The Jaioi, who ref.de in * Vol. i.p- 150. f Travels, ^c. p. i^fi- ^ Travels through that part of North- Aracr,c», f.-rnierly railed Loui- fiiina. vol. i. p. »82. Engimi tranlUion. Luna.m : I77t. % Travels, vol. ii. p. 14*^ 1 VBtniH^- M ' ' f. '■ i» A p r E N D I ?:. Gua'una, %i'. Thcfc afiinitics arc rcrtainly firiking. Others niiglii be pointed out. ^ 'I'lie phvfual rcfemblanccs between the Chincfc and many of the American tribes, are very prominent. Dut I do not think they arc more fo than the refemblances which fubfift between the Tame Americans and many other tribes of Afia, befiJes tiic Chinele. Haython of Armenia, and other writers mention the fparfu beard of the Chinefe. Though the Ame- riains have beards, contrary to the wild afl'crtion* of Dr. Ro- bertfon, and many other writers, I think it certain that they have Icfs beard than the nations of Europe, and their imme- diatc defcendauts in America. The Japanefc and many other nations of ACvi have but little beards as well as the Chinefe. There is one circumilance in which the Chinefe and Americans feem to difF.-r very eflentially. It is the general aflemblage of features in forming what may be called the fpirit, or mental cx- preflIon,of thecountenance. I'erfons who haverefided in China, and have had opportunities of attentively examining the inhabi- tants of that country, are forcibly ftruck. upon their arrival among our Indians, with the peculiar freedom or ferocity of their countenance. But this difference is lefs confiderable than may, at firft fight, appear. The features of individuals, and of courfe the features of whole nations, receive an artificial tone or expreflion from the mode of life, the ftate offocicty, and many other circumdances. I doubt not that the wild and in- depen^ient Tartars, from whom the Chinefe feem to have ftjrung, have is much freedom and ferocity in their countenance as the independent and favage tribes of America ; and it is not improbable, that the Peruvian, who lived in a happy climate, and under a government which was more attentive to the pro- grefs of the arts than to the fpread of arms, was as remarkable for the mild and j)lacid countenance as is the native of China in the comh^ercial towns, where he has been moft carefully con- templated by pliilofophers. TH£ END. i ^ jBiWftliliiillii' III j » r w.iiiil. rt «t^ iriifliiiliiiiiMlitiiii 209 •V' ALLC VE Philadelp origin of I jamin Sm; feffor der Uotanik mebrerer fchafteii 1 CIX, 133 Diefe zwey wenig t deffen an fu Eit'er unfers der Erd - ur zwar nicht ei crfchienenen Theil diefer Scltrift hier Freunde der nicht genug < rifchen The fchon einma in deffen nic( fern Tbeile r guiftifche Tl den; wir fin fie zu geben. Die (f. hereichnetev trile ■.■">»"■ VVeprafiden L. Z. 1^09. Zweyter Band» einer Umfchreibung in eine andere Pronunciation ift Liiiunderung unvermeidljch ; und wir wifleii nacii je« nen Angaben heftimmter, was jedes fagen foil. iJer zweyte Abfchnitt ift der, dem 'Fitel entfprechemle ei- gentlicheHauptabfchnitt, worinUnteifuchiingen Uber den IJrfprung der amerikanifchen Volkerftamme an- geftcllt und geprUft werden ; aber unter dem befchei- denen Titel: preliminary discourfe. Der dritte Ab- fchnitt enthalt: vergleichende VVdrterfammlungen,und der vierte ilt ein Anhang mit Bemerkufigen und £r- lauterungen, niimlirh neuen Zufatzen noch zu den herrj^chen Bereicherungen der zweyten Ausgabe — fo unermUdlich bemOht ift der Vf. , uns alles zu ge« ben, was ihm fein Eifer und feine gOnftige Lage fort- dauernd Uber diefen wichtigen Gegenftand verfchafft. Der erjle und zweyte Abfchnitt find keines Aus- zugs fahig. Uer dritte beginnt mit einem Motto aut Strahlenbffg : wie vi;ile AulfchlUffe und AufUlarun- Sen Uber die Wanderungen der Viilker erwarret wer* en dUrfen, wenn man/,^Jftwi/2r^wxAnweifung befolgt. und eine zureichende Kenntnifs der Spracnen von Nord - Afien dabey vorleuchtct ; welrhe feit der Zeit hundertfach bewahrte Maxime bald hernach auch durch Charlevoix's Urtheil unterftUtzt wird: dafs Ge- farauche, Religion und Traditionen viel ver^'nderli- cher und dem Einfluffe Fremder viel mehr au.sgefetzt find, als die Sprachen der Volker von Amerika, de> ren Unterfuchung und deren Vergleichung mit den Sprachen der alten Welt alfo vorzUglich betrieben wer- den mUffe. Diefen Weg verfolgt der Vf., und fo ha- ben auch alle feine Unterfuchungen Uber den Ur- fprung der Amerikanifchen Volker Jinguiftifche Data zur hauptfachlichen Bafis. Der Vf. hat hierin offen- bar die richtige Bahn betreten , um fo mehr, da er die BerUckfichtigung anderer wichtiger und zuverlaffi* ger Thatfachen nicnt auslchJiefst. Es iftauoh voJikom* men. wahr, dafs der Vf., wie er fagt, bey jenemS»re- ben , den Urfprung vieler Nord - Amerikanifchen V6l> ker und ihren Zufammenhang mit Afien zu erOrtern, fich einen neuen Weg gebahnt habe. Der Vf. ift fich bewufst, dafs feine Sammlung von Original- Papieren Uber die Nord • Amerikanifchen Sprachen fchon fehr anfehnlich ift, und dafs er fchon betrachtliche Fort- fchritte zu dem fich gefteckten Ziele gemacht hat, und er kann mit Fug und Recht die Erwartung hegen, dafs fein VVerk, auch, wie er befcheiden hinzufetzt. In feiner noch unvollkommenen Geftalt, dem kunfti- gen Gefchichtfchreiber von Amerika wefenfliche Dienfte leiften werde. Er glaubt die Verwandtfchaft Dd der /./i 911 ALLG. LITERATUR - 2EITUN0 312 der Amerikanifchen Sprachcn mit Afiatifchen, und foinit jener Viilker mit tliefen voUig dargethan zu haben. V/ir werden hernach prafen, in wie weit jhm diefs gelnngen ift; jetzt folgen wir dem Gange feiner Unterfuchungen. Der Vf. beginrit mit der Angabe einer bedeuten- den Anzahl von Schrififtellern iiber die Abkunft der Amerikaner aus der alten Welt, und der Meinungen einigor anderer, dafs fie in Amerika felbft entftanden feyeu, von weicbeii letzteren aber fehr oberflachlich iiber die Sache geurtlieilt worden fey, belbnilers von Voltaire, deffen EinwUrfe gegen die erfte iMeinung (S. Vll.) ausgezogen find. Der Vf., welcher das Gcwicht der verfchiedenen Entfclieidunijsgrnnde iiber den Urfprung und die ge- genfeitigen Verhaltniffe dieferVolker pritft, bemerkt mit Keclit, dafs in Betreff der Nationen felbft und ih- rer Lebensweife noch vie! zu wenig unterfucht fey. Am beften ilberzeugt da'von die I'arallele, welcne man am natiiriichften zwifchen diefen Amerikanifchen zum Theil kleinen und zerftreuten Vdlkerfchaften und den Viilkerfchaften des nordoftlichen Afiens zieht. So fchiitzbare, ja vortreffliche Reifebef^rei- bungen wir rtber jene von /»w/a^, Bartram, f^otneyu.a. haben: fo find doch die Nachrichlen und Refultate, welche z. B. felbft cin fo grofser, ni6{i,lichft tief for- fchemier, und fcharfblickender Volker Beobachter, W'e Folnetfy zu jjeben vermoclue, gar nicht in Ver- gleichung zu fteJIen mit den [Nachrichten und Reful- taten, welche die Sorgfait der ruffifchen Regierunz fUr Wiffenfchaft unttn* Katharina II. y befonders auch durcb den ehrwiirdigen Pallas bey Unterthanen fam- meln laffen konnte, und die wir in G^or^i \y Befchrei bung aller Nationen des ruffifchen Keichs zufammen- geftolit vor uns haben. So fehr der Blick unfers Vfs. auf diefe afiatifchen Nationen gerichtet ift, und fo be* merkenswerthe Facta flher die Idenlirat des Ausfe- hens der Nord -Amerikanifchen Wilden und der 0ft- Afiaten er zunachft anfiihrt : fo hat er doch jener voliftandigen Nachricht entbehrt, und die feinigen auch ^. Bell's travels from S. Petersburgh to various pat*ts of Afia Edinb. 1788- und der Survey of the Ruffian empire by Capt. Sergey Plefchiif Engl. Ueber- fetzung Lond. 1792. entlehnen mHffen. Manche von den Angaben Qber die afiatifchen Volkerfchaften, de- ren Worter fich in dcm Petersburger vergleichenden G'offarium aufgeftellt finden, und deren iNamen daher Hr. B. als Vorbcreitung zu feinen nachmaligen liogui- ftifchen Vergleichungen (S. LXXVl bis LXXXVll.) erkliirt, find entweder zu diirftig oder nicht ganz richtig, z. B. wenn er Nr. 130. Karafinskoe am Je- nifei ini Turufchanskifchen oder Mangafeifchen Ge- bipte gent)mmpn hat fUr „Karaffini die Bt'wolmer des Konigreichs Carezem, unfern des Gihon, des Oxus der Alten." Auch den Werth der Traditionen der amerikani- fchen Volker wQrdigt der Vf., und furht zu zeigen, dafs man ohne fie Ober den wahren Urfprung derfel- ben ill Zweifel bleiben wUrde Er hat befonders aus Adair's hiflory of America die dortigen Nachrichten von Volkern benutzt, welche alle fagen, dafs fie einft von der Weftfeite'des Miffifippi herUber gekommen feyen. Der Vf. hat in diefer Hinficht vieles Inter- effantegefammelt, und wie wichtig und willkommen mttffen folchen Forfcherii die mancherley iirchivali- fchen Nachrichten feyn, welche, wie wir aus Briefen wiffen, die amerlkanifch^ Regierung durch die Be- fitznahme von Louifiana ganz neuerlich erhalten hat. Neue Quellen offnen fich dem Elhnographen , wenn jn folchen, den unbekannten Landern nahen Gegen- den Manner wie Pallas, ^'ejferfon, Volney, Humboldt lund unfer Vf. fammeln. Freylich ift bey der far diefe Zwecke wiederum hochft forderlichen Entfernung von Europa dem Vf. nicht alles zuganglich gewefen, was Europa's reiche Literatur darbietet, und roaa darf es ihm nicht zum Vorwurf anrechnen, wenn ihm fo auch tnanche folche Tradition entgeht, z. B. die hey Mackenzie (S. 133. der deutfchen Ueberfetzung von 2Swwfrman«), dafs die Chepewyan nach ihrer Tra- dition urfprunglich aus einem andern Lande, das von einem fehr verdorbenen Volke bewohnt wurde, ge- konuncn find, und zwar tiber einen fehr grofsen See, der fchmal, feicht und voller Infeln war, wo fie, da immer Winter mit Eis und tiefem Schnee berrfchte, grofses Elend ausitanden ; und dafs fie zuerft bey dem Ivupfer- Minenfluffegelandet feyen. — Sowemg alle lolche Traditionen fUr Erwerb f«r die Gefchichte zu halten find : (o bleibt es doch fehr moglich, dafs darin fcinzelne Kdrner fur diefe erhalten feyen, befonders bev Nationen, wo nicht neueEreicniffe von einem, ihr iicnickfal umwendenden, Einflulfe das Andenken an fruhere verdrangten; und es ware zu viel, wenig- ftens zu allgemein behauptet, was der berOhmte Vot- ney in feinen vortrefflichen Eclairciffemens iiber die amerikanifchen Wilden fagt, dafs keine Tradition diefer amerikanifchen Volker Ober 100 Jahre hinauS reiche, wenn er nicht dazu fetzte aucun fouvenir rt- gulier, aucune tradition exacte. Aber ganz vorzOg- lich und hauptfSchlichft die amerikanifchen Sprachen geben unferm Vf. fein Refiiltat : dafs ihre Verwandt- fchaft unter fich und mit Afiatifchen zeige, dafs fie alle Ein Volk feyen, aber dafs fie oicht zureiche, um auszumitteln, dafs die Amerikaner aus Oft - 2i/>^n aus- gewandert, und welches der Urftamm fey. "* Vor der Ausfahrung diefer Anficht geht Hr. B, zu ^ejferfon's und Clavigero's Meinungen , jene ift in rien Notes on the ftate of Virginia Lend. 1787- angege- ien , diefe in der bekannteren Storia di Meffico. Jene geht dahin: fo unvollkommen unfere Kenntnifs von imerikanifchen Sprachen fey, und fo viele amerikani* Iche Volkerftamme fchon vertilgt find, ohne dafs ihre Sprache erhalten worden : fo ergebe fich doch fchon aus der Vergleichung des Bekannt-gewordenen, das merkwiirdige Factum: wenn man die Sprachen in Amerika und die in Afien nach ihrer wahrfcheinli- chen Abftammung ordne: fo finde man zwanzig in Amerika fQr Eine in Afien , d. i. folche die alle Aehn- lichkeit unter einander verloren haben. In wenigen Jahrhunderten kdnnen fich Dialecte von einander ion- deroj aber ein ungeheures Zeitmafs fey erforderlich, wenn m wenn ren ih len. anderi weife Afiatil denhe zeugt Mexi( Eefun< den derts I 912 dafs fie einfk ' gekommea vieJes Inter- wjlJkommea ey i'rchivali* aus Briefen Liich die Be. fhalten hat. >hen, wena ahen Gegen. y, Humboldt der fiir diefe Entfernung ich gewefen, und maa men, virenn tgeht, 2. B. Jeberfetzung h ihrer Tra- de, das voa wurde, ge- grofsen See, wo fie, da e herrfchte, xft bey dem lowenig aile efchichte zu ), dafs daria befonders I ejnem, ihr ndenken aa iel , wenig- rahmte Fol- s iiber die 5 Tradition ihre hinaus fouvenir re- 3nz vorzflg- n Sprachen Verwandt- e, dafs fie reiche, um ■ iJypn aus- • ;eht Hr. B. jeiie ift io 17. angege- fftco. Jene intnifs voa amerikani- e dafs ihre iocb fchon enen, das >rachen ia hrfcheinli- wanzig in alieAehn- t wenigen ander ion- orderlich, ' wcijn ■*' Num. 148* MAY 1809. / f ! wenn zwey Dialccte fich ganz trennen, und alleSpu- rcn ihres gemeinfcliaftlichen Urfprungs verlieren lol- len. Aus der grofsern Anzahl dieier radicalen Ver- anderungen, die in Amerika offcnbar erfoigt find, er- weife fich das hiihere Alterthum diefer VolKer als der Afiatifchen, {o^ejferfon. Clavigero hgt: dieVerfchie- denheit der Sprachen in Amerika ift fehr grofs, und zeugt deutJicn fiir die Verfchiedenheit der Voiker; in Mexico felbft haben wir fUnf und dretfjlig Sprachen gefunden, in Slid- Amerika lind noch mehrere gefun- den worden. Am Anfange des fiebzehnten Janrhun- derts fanden die Portugiefen Aeren funfzig am Marag- non im nordlichen Braiilien. (Hr. i^., der nur die englifche Ueberfetzung vt)n Clavigero vor fich hatte, die wir nicht kennen, fchreibt: 50, im Originale fteht: hundert und funfzig, allenlings eine ungeheure Zahl, wobey ohne Zweifel aile kleinen Nuancen der Dialekte, die fich bey folchen unverbundenen Viilkern fcharfer als aiifsentem unterfcheiden, mit berechnet find.) Es fey wahr, es finde fich zwifchen manchen amerikanifchen Sprachen eine grofse Aehnlichkeit, z. B. zwifchen der Endeve, Opata und Tanahumara in Nord - Amerika (namlich: in Neu-Mexiko) und zwi- fchen der Mocohi, Toba und yJbipona in Sudamerika (namlich in I'araguay). Aber viele andere feven eben fo verfchieden von einaiider als das Illyrifche vom He- braifchen: Man konne beftimmt behaupten, dafs es keine lebendeii oder ausgefrorbenen Spacher giebt, die von einanderverfchiedener waren, als das Mexika- nifche, Otomittfche, Taraskijche, Mayifche und Mixteki- fche, filnf Sprachen verfchiedener ProvinzenMexikos. Es wQrde abfurd feyn , zu fagen , dafs diefs verfchie- dene Dialekte Einer Stammfprache ' feyen. Wenn, fchliefb't Clavigero, die AmeriKaner von Familien, die bey der Spracnverwirrung zu Babel fich zerftreuten, die Afiaten von andern folchen Familien abftammen, fo werde man vergeblich bey diefen inSitten undSpra- chen den Urfprung jener fuchen. — Clavigero ^ aus Mexiko gebiittig, und Sammler feiner Nachrichten aus dortigen Quellen, hat eine wichtige Stimme, wenn er die Unterfchiede der Sprachen feines Vater- landes aufftellt, ds$ er fo genau beobachtete. Aber wir, nach umfaffendererrnStucuum der amerikanifchen Spra- chen , als Amerika oder Europa noch genutzt iiat, konnen deutlichen Sprachen • Zufammenhang itn Siiden ^ und imNorden von Amerika imGrofsen zeigen, oicht j blofs Aehnlichkeiten einzeloer WSrter, wie Hr. Bar- \ton; nur gerade das ehemaJige Reich Mexiko giebt i ein fchwer zu lofendes Problem, wie dort fo radicale \ Sprachenverfchiedenheit war und b.Ueb. Hr. B. ver- webt die EinwQrfe gegen die angegebenen Meinungen in feine unterrichtenden und zum Theil ganz neuen, aus feinen ISachforfchungen in Philadelphia « dem Mit- telpunkteder vereinigtenStaaten, gefchopften Bemer- kungen aber die befonders Nord- Amerikanifchen Voiker, von denen wir das Intereflantefte ausheben, und zueleich die zerftreuten Notizen des Appendix einfchahen. Die Delawaren fcheinen altere Sitze im Lande ge- habt zu haben , als andere Voiker, und waren nacb 214 ihrer Tradition ehemals ein grofses, flber dieoftliche und liidlicheMeereskufteausgebreitetes Volk ; fie be- ftehen aus dreyStammen, den fl^anhmi, IFunalachtiga und MiHfi, und die Mohikans feyen gewifs auch einZweig. H». B. hat hier noch bemerkt, dafs die Delawaren von alien Volkern auf der Oftfeite desMiffifippi, die ih« bekanntwurden, VSter genanntwerden; dafsdagegen die fogenannten fechs Nationen fie ihre Neveus nennen, und von den Delawaren als Oncles anerkannt vverJen. So fchatzbar alie foJche Notizen aber eine fo feme Welt lind , bey welcher jft folche Spuren verfolgt werden maffen, fo erhellet doch aus dem zweyten Beyfpiele, dafs folche Namen nicht immer Abftammung, fondern auch Reipects - Verhiiltniffe bezeichnen folJen. Denn die fechs iNationen und die Delawaren find offcnbar ganz verfchiedenenStammes. Letztrenennen fichl^HHl- Lennape. Hr. 5. fahrt LoskieVs Deutung diefes Na- mens : Indianifche Manner und die von Heckewelder: ur- fprunglicli, an. So belegt letztere durch die angefuhr- ten Beyfpiele ift: fo konnen wir doch, Ubrigens gar nicht tar erzwungene Vereinigungen geftimmt, hier nicht umhin,diei\ahederBegriffe: Eingeborner.und: Mann , zu zeigen ; dafs lemo aber in diefem ganzen Stamme: Mann, bedeutet, fahrt nicht nur Hr. B. im Wortregifter felbft an, fondern auch Volney hat es be- fttttigt. Hr. B. fahrt fort: Unter alien ISationen zwi- fciieii Mafiachulet und demMiffifippi babe nur die De- la warifche und die der 6 Nationen das Recht, allge- meine Verfammlungen zufammen zu rufen. Die Dela- waren und andere benachbarte Stamme unterlagen den 5 Nationen , diefe .betrugen fich als die Herren jener and als Befitzer des Bodens : aber als fetztere bev ih- ler Anhanghchkeit an England in dem amerikanifchen Revolutionskriege viel verloren , bekamen die andern Stamme wieder freyere Hande, und die Delawaren wiederAutoritat; fie batten zuletzt zunachft unter den Wyandotsgeitanden:— Die iWi»f/ioderAfo«/^M,nennen ichMniJ/i, fo wie die Halbinfel , die fie bewohnen: Mntjjink (minis bedeutetim Chippewayifchen : Infel). — Die Chippeway, deren Sprache oUenbar ein Dialect der Delawarifchen ley, heiisen bey den D&la waren : Sh)pit- uiBy welches nach Hn. Heckewelder's Mittheilung auf Delawarifch fo viel bedeute als : whijiling , fbilans. — Die Shawnees, belfer Sawwaitnoo oder Sawanos, wohn- ten ehemals Ober den Fiuffe Savanna in Georgien. Ein Theil blieb in jenen Gegenden , und ift in dem Bunde der Creeks, fie haben dort ihren alten Namen und alte Sprache. Ein anderer Theil zog nordlich nsch Penfyl- vanien , wozu befonders der Stamm der Pickcmes ge- horte. Das Gebiet der Sawwanoo war fonft fehr be- Iracbthch, und erftreckte fich von Kentuckey fadweft- lich bis zum Miffifippi ; auch fie mufsten fich den funf Nationen unterwerfen. Die Kikkapoos , zwifchen dem Michigan -See und dem Miffifippi halte man fUr einen unmittelbaren Zweig der Sawwannoo. — Die Miamis nennen fich fo, bey d^n Delawaren beifsen fie : Twicktwe oder Twichtwees. Auch ihreSprache zieht Hr. 27. zu dem Delawarifchen Stamme; das Gegentheil bat wait tnehr Grund, wie Folney nach den Ausfagen eines genauen Keoaers diefer Sprache verfichert, deffen fchiitzbare Samai- A. Ih Z. Num. X48. MAY 1809. ^15 Sammlung MiamifcVier Wiirter auch manche Bemer- kungenilbergranimatifcheKormen enthalt, f. ainEnde des Tableau d» Climat etdufoldes Etas - unis d' Amtrimt. Die Wahrheit liegt in der Milte. Nicht blofs Aehn- lichkeit derW6rter,fonHern auchAehnlichkeit cevvif- fer Formen fpricht fUr Verwandtfchaft mit Dialecten des, wie Hr. B. ihn nennt, Delawarifchen Stammes; aber Hiefes Zufammentreffen ift nicht fo hauHg, und wechfelt zu fehr mit Verfchiedenheit ab, als dafs eine grof'ie INaha der Abftammung angenommen werden diuite. iJJe Wiahtanak feyen ein Zweig der Miamis. — Die JlleffiJ augers oder JVIeffafagues ein fehr fleifsiees Volk am iluronen • und oberen See, haben eine Spracne, die ohne Zweifel niit der der Chiopeisayer una batiks naheverhunden fey, aber auch Worter einiger fUdli- chen Stamme enthalte. — Der Penobfiots fofien 1795. weniger als 300 gewefen feyn. — DasGebiet deriVar- niqanfets erltrecktefich im lyten Jahrhunderteim Nor- den und Often 30 — 40 (Engl.) Meilen vom Sekunkfluffe und der Narraganfetbay, und fchlofs Khodeisiand und andere Infein diefer Bay ein, weftlich und fiidlich reichte es bis zu dem Platze Wekapage, 4— 5 Meilen vom Pawcutukfluffe, welcher als Sad - und VVefteriinze angefehen wurde und die oftliche Griinze der Pequots war. — Von der Befchaffenheit der Sprache der Pe- quots, diefer fonftmachtigen Nation, haben wir vergeb- lich einige Aufklarungen oder Winke gefucht. — Uie 5 Nationen, (die zufammen genommen von den Franzo- fen den Namen Iroquois, daher Irokefen, fo wie von den Hollandern von dem einen Stamme den Namen MiquHs, erhielten, von den Englandern nach eben demfelben zuwcilen Qberhaupt Mokawsk genannt wer- den, fich aber Aquanufchionig oder Konunizi Oniga d. i. Bundesvolker nennen) find die Senekas^' Mohawks, welche fich den alteften Zweig nennen, Onondagos, Cayttgas, Onetdas, Ihr Bund beifsl bey denEingebornen: die fejle Hand ; erfcheint ungefabrVor etwas Ober 200 Jahre und zwar in der Nahe der grofsen Canadifchen Seen, nach einigen im Norden,nachandern im Sitden des EriefeeszuStande gekomroen zu feyn ; die drey erftern Vdlker heifsen die alteren, diezwey letztern die jiln- geren, Aber im erftenTheile des igten Jahrh, wurden noch die Tuscaroras oder Tuskerura, als die fechste Na- tion in den Bund aufgenofnmcn, welche von den Chee- raken und Englandern von den Kuften yon Nordkaro* lina vertrieben, nordwarts gezogen waren. Sie feyen, fo wie die IFouotis, Theile von den FampticoHghs , in Nordkarolina, vondenendort derPampticough Sund >/nhi feinen Namen erhaiten habe. piefer Bund nahm 1608. den Strich von dem oftlichen Ende des Eriefecs bis zum Ghamplainfee, und von den Kittatinney und liighlands bis zum Ontariofee und dem Lorenzfluffe ein. [Siamlich als fie kurz vor diefer Zeit mit den Adi. rovditos, iiber den See, Krieg gebabt hatten, und letzte- ren, hefonders weil diefe von den Franzufen mit Schiefs- gswehr unterftQtzt wurden, das jenen damals noch aii unbekannt war, unteriagen : fo bracbtee* ihrePolitik, durch die fie fich unter alien amerikanifchen Volker- fchaften auszeichnen, dahin, dafs fie zu rechter Zeit mit jenen und den Franzofen Frieden machten. Aber Frieden konnten fie nicht halten* begierig nach Ruhm und Ervweiterung ihres Gebiets kebrten fie in der an- eegcbenen Zeit ib re Wnffen gegen die Delawaren, Ma- hicanns und andere ci^rtige Stamme, und zwaneen diefe, ibreOberherrfcbaft anzuerkennen. Die Cockne- uiagoes leyen ein Zweig der Mohawks. Auch die fi/yandots, befonders um Fort Jofeph und Detroit, feyen ein Zweig jenesBundes, und von demfelben ge- jaothigt worden , um Friede zu bitten , wie L. Evans iCage, der fie far Ein Volk mit den Toxfs und Outaga- mis halt. — Von den Nadoweffiern ^ den Sioux der Franzofen , bemerkt Hr. B. , fie batten ebemals das i^aud um Detroit bewohnt. In derNiihe diefes Platzes fey ein breiter Flufs, der fich in die VVeftfeite des Sees St. Clair ergiefse, und der bey den Ghippewayern und audern amerikanifchen Volkerfchaften : Nadowti Sipi d. i. iNadoweffier- Flufs beifse; das Volk von IJe- troit neiine ibn Hurunenftufs. Die Nadoweffier feyen ein Zweig der W'yundots, welche letztere von den Ghippewayern; Nottawejfet genannt werden. (Abge- feheu von dem Gewicht diefes Grundes wOrde ja aber daraus eben fo gut der umgekehrte Fall fnlgen, und die vVyaodots ein Zweig der Nadoweffier feyn konnen, die in Verbindung mit den fechs Nationen getretea» und dadurch zu manchen ibrer Worter geKommen feyn konnten.) — Ueber dieCAwra*^, imSOden und Sfldweften der Nord- Amerikanifchen Staat^in, er- fuhr Hr. B. voft Hn. M'Gilwray, dafs fie langer als die Muskohge auf der Oftfeite des Milfifippi feven, indem letztere von erfteren: ihre jflngeren Brii'der, genannt wUrden, und Hr.iS. fand dieFarbe deK^hee- rake lichter, als bey dem grofsten Theil der ihm be- kannten amerikaniichen Vdikerfchaften. DerUeber- eang der Muskohge ilber den Mit'filippi fcheine in die Zeit zu fallen, wo die Spanier unter Ferd. de Suto zuerft in Florida landeton. Sie haben nach Hn. M'Gilwray's Mittheilung eine Tradition, dafs, wah- rend ihre Vorfahren abwarts zogen, fie Nachricht bekamen von Leuien, welche andere Farbe;, als fie, }laare (Iber den ganzen Kdrper, und Donner und Blitz in den Handen batten. ~ Die Chikkafah feyen wahrfcheinlicb nabe bey Gbikkafah - Bluff Qber den IViiffifippi gegangen; diefs milffe einige Zeit nach der Ankunft der Spanier in iMexiko gewefen feyn, weil fie und die Choktah fchon aus der wef'lichen Gegend die fchonen Chikkafah' und Choktah- Pferde mitee- bracht, die von Andalufifcher Raffe feyen. Die Chik- kafah werden ausdrOcklicb in der Expedition des Ferd. de Soto nach Florida erwilhnt. Sie geben von fich an , dafs fie ein kleiner Theil ibrer Nation fey»a, und dafs ihre Vorfahren noch jenfeits des Miffifippi pach den Kiiften des ftillea Meeres zu wohnen. ai7 {Die Fortfetpung fitlgt.) 9li itirePolitik, hen VoJker- rechter Zeit bten. Aber nach Ruhm e in der an- war en, Ma- id zwaneen Die Cockne. Auch die ind IJetroit, smfelbcn ge- 'ie L. Evans und Outaga- 1 Sioux der »hemals das efes Platzes ^eftfeite de« ippewavera n; Nadou/ei oik von IJe- 'effier feyen re von dea en. (Abge- rcie )a aber olgen, und yn konrien, n getretea, gekommea Sflden und taatf'n , er- ianger als ippi feyen, en Briitler, e deK^hee- ler ihm be. Der Ueber- ;ine in die d. de Suto nach Hn. lafs, wah- Nachricht >e, als fie, unner und j/aA feyen Uber dea t nach der eyn, weil sn Gegend rde mitge- Die Cltik- lition des ;eben voa ion feyRn, Miffifippi en. 217 Num. I4Q. .,-... — jL lll i w ii II '•i H U MhM-uJti' lis ALLGEMEINE LITERATUR - ZEITUNG Sonnabends, den i-j. May 1809. WISSENSCHAFTLICHE WERKE. " VERMISCHTE SCHRIFTEN. JPhiladelphia , gedr. b. Bioren : Neto views of the origin of the tribes and nations of America by B. S. Barton, etc. (Fortfitzung der in Num. 148. abgebrochenen Recen/ion.) Die Katahba waren eine betrachtlicbe Nation , und ihr Land in Norden und Nord-Often begranzt von Nord- Karolina, in Often und SUden von Sild- Karolina , im Siid-Weften von den Cheerakes. Vor 95 Jahren war ilir Hauptfitz i4oMeiJen von den Chee- rakes und 200 Meilen von Gharlestown. Nach Hn. At. Martin, fonft Gouverneurs von Nord-Karolina, hal- ten fie eine Jabresverfammlung. Sie geben den Kd- pfen ihreri(inder eine kttnftliche Form durch ftarke Zufammendriingung; doch fcheine diefer Gcbrauch abgekommen zu fcyn, indem man bey dem jUngern Theile der Nation keine fiachen zttfammengcdrangten Kopfe finde, ein Umftand, der fich ntiit unfers be- rOhtnten BlumenbacKs Annahme der Fortdauer alfo zufammengedrttckter Formen nicht vertrage. 'Von den Natchez theilt M' Gilwray mit, dafs ihre Ueber- bleibfel i7«>o unter den Creeks deren Sprache fpre- chen, aber ein Dollmetfchcr verficherte 17941 dafs fie ihre eigene Sprache beybehalten ; welche auch du Pratz eriernt hatte, aber nicht mittheilt, weil Kennt- nifs einer folchen ausgeftorbenen Sprache ohne Inter- effe fey , (namlich far den Handelsmann, far den vie- le Sammlungen Worter fremder Sprachen zunachft berechnet find, ftatt dafs man das Intereffe des Ethno- sraphen und Linguiften hatte immer recht lebhaftauf- faffen foUen.) Die abrigen Beinerkungen aber die fadlichen Vdlker find bey den genannten aus dem, 'wegen feiner fonderbaren Hauptanficht unter uns bey weitem nicht genug genOtzten Adair, bey andern aus gewdhnlichen Halfsmittein gefchopft. Bey allem £)ank far Hn. Bs. Beytrage zur Kenntnifs von Nord- Amerika, mUffen wir hier noch die frohe Hoffnung ausfprechen , dafs wir nun bald durch unfers jgrofsen Topographen und einzigen Kenners von NorcT-Ame- rika, unfers verehrten Ebeting's Fortfetzung feines claffifchen Werks recht reich an Aufklarungen der Kunde und Gefchicnte diefes Landes werden. Die Haupttendenz von Hn, B's intereffantem Werke ift, wie wir unfern Lefern fchon fagtcn, Ungnijlifch. Wir baben von der ethnographifchen zuerft gehandelt, vnd gehcn nun zu diefer aber. Wir haben zuorft ttber die Bereicherungen luiferer linguiftifcheo Kennt> niffe, die wir Hn. Es fchatzbarenWorterfammlungen verdanken, und Hn. B's Verdienften dabey, fodann von den Grundfatzen der Vergleichun'g der verfchie- denen Sprachon, welche cr bcfulgt, und zulctzt von den iinguiftifchcn und cthnographifchen Refultaten zu handeln, welche unfer Vf. durch feiue Uuterfu- chungen findet. Aufrichtiger Dank Jedem, der in fernen Gcgen- den uns Wdrtcr fremder Sprachen fammelt, fie genau und mit aberlegender Vorficht darftellt: vielracher Dank Hn. J3., der uns fo viole Wtirtcr fo vieler Spra- chen fammelte. Er hat in der erften Ausgabe 52, in der zweyten 70 Begriffe aufgeftellt, (die fich fammt- lich aucn unter den, von der Kaiferin Katharina zum Behuf des grofsen vergleichenden VVorterbuchs auf- gcftellten Wortern finden, und einezwcckmafsige Aus- wahl aus denfelben find) und hat von fo viek>n ame- rikanifchen Sprachen, als ihm durch frUhere oder ei- gene Nachforfchungen mehr oder weniger zugSnglich waren, die WSrter derfelben fUr diefe Begriffe ge- fammelt. Die grofse Menge von WOitern, welche uns Hr. B. zuerft bekannt macht, find durch andere Schrift von den, au*; fchon gedruckten Quellen unter- fchieden; diefe Quellen fincf genau nachgewiefen , fo wie auch die in jeder derfelben herrfchende Art der Ausfprache. Mehrere derfelben find aus kleinen, aufser Amerikakaumgel^^mmenenSchriftenentlehntunduns infofern auch neu. Wie genau Hr. B. dabey zu Werke gegangen, erhellet vorziiglich daraus, dafs erlich wird, diirch Ben. tzung diefer und vieler andern Hiilfsmittel, des vor uns Jie- gpnden Ituchs und dor von dam beriihmten Rcifenden ^tex. von Humboldt aus Sud-Amerika und Mexiko mitgebrachten HiUfsmitteln von mehr alsdreyjlig ame- rikanifchen Sprachen und Mundarten eine mehr oder ■weniger volIitancUge, grammatifche UeberJicht und von beynahe Imndert amenkauifchen Sprachen und Wundarten fehr oder einigermafsen reichh -Itige Wor- terbUcher oder wenigftens SammJungen mehrerer W 6r- ter zu haben. Selbf uber Anierika alfo (ausgenom- men von. den nordUchen Volkern, von dem Ausl^ufs des iVlifGfippi an, mit denen Hr. B. in naheren Ver- hiiltniffen ftand,) find wir jetzt um fehr vicles reicher, als er, und vermogen, von alien von Hn. ^. aufgeftell- ten Begriffen, die Mexikanilchen, Peruanifchen Be- zeirhnun en uud viele von VoJkern anzufuhren, de- ren Namen felbfi Hn. E. kaurn bekannt geworden zu feyn fiheinen. AlJerdines ift auch der Titel des Biichs etwas zu weit . eufst, wenn man nicht ein Nifsverhaltnifs zwifchen den Nachrichten aber die eben genannien Gegenden und die i\brigen Theile Ame- rika linden foil. Demnachft Jiegt dem tiefforfchen- den Linguiften und Kthnographen der Wunfch recht nahe, dk($ es Hn. B. geuillen haben mochte, auch auf einige grammatifche Formen der Volker, deren Wortt-r er uns fo forgfSltig giebt,*feine Aufmerkfam- keit zu richten. Es kdpnte undankbar fcheinen, wenn man fo viel Schatzbares von einem wackeren Gelehr- ten erhalt, wie wir von Hn. B., noch mehr zu ver- langen ; wenn nicht auf der einen Seite das Intereffe der Wiffenfchaft e>- forderte, und wenn nicht auf der andern Seite die Gelegenheit, folche gelehrte und *>r- fchfnde Sammler in einem bleibenden Aufenthalte in einem fo giinftigen Local zu erblicken, fo feJten wa- re, dar man fie gem fo viel brauchen mochte, als es ohne Verdacht des Mifsbrauchesmoglich ift. Auch find wir fern davon, dem Vf. es anzure' hnen, dafs ■wir au£eben find, und 16 fehlen; oder Gage's Angaben von der Spraclie der Poconchi, wo man taxabriim- mel, vinaf Mann, t>o(Frau, cAi Mund , cfs bald zwifchen der ynd jener Sprache, bald zwifchen andern, fonder belVandiger zwifchen ebendenfelben, Statt Bnden, wenn ein Refultat tiber den Zufamnienhang der Sprache und VOlker darauf gegriindet werden foil. Hr. B. fchrei- tet offenbar viel zu fcbnell zu der Annahme eines fol- chen Zufaminenhanges fort, und fieht zu leicht Aehn- lichkeiten. VVienoch viel leichter wilrden fich i'olche Aehnlichkeiten haben finden laffen, wenn Hn. B. die zweite, nicht ins Publikuni ausgegebene Bearbeitung des Pallas'fchcn VVorterbuchs zu Geticht gekommeu wSre, wo alle Worter aller verfchiedener Sprachen canz nach der alphab.etifchen Ordnung zufammenge- Itellt find, und alfo dabey blofs die Gleichheit der Laute, nicht die der Abftammung ins Auge gefafst ift. Wir wollen Beyfpiele der Vergleichungen aushe- ben, die wenigftens noch einjgen Schein fiir fich ha- ben. Haar ift bey den Chippeways: liffts oder lijfy^ bey den Wenden in der Launtz (Hr. B, nat aus einer in Amerika fehr verzeihlichen Verwechjelung: Win- den in Carntbea und der Laufitz): lojfee ; und bey den Woccons : tumme^ bey den Kartalinshi auf dem Kaukafus: toma; ^aitc/t bey den Delawaren: wach- tey, Un Olonetzifchen : u/atifcUo; und bey den (Jhile- fen: pue, bey den VVotiaken: ooot';.Fufl, im Brafili- fehen pi, im Perfifchen una Bucharifchen : paee;. Stern im Delawarifchen , Chippewayifchen , Algou- kifchen: alafik, im Kotowskifchen und Affauskilchen : atagdn, atak ; und im Chilefil'chen : wangeUn, im Tfcher- kanfchen (aus einem bey einer folchen Menge von au- fserft genau copirten fremden Wortern recht verzeih- lichen Schreibefehler ift ftatt hier Tfchtrkaff. zu fetzen, unter dem vorhergehenden : Japan eefe ein Strich, gleich als ob das eben anzugel)ende Wort auch Japanifch ware:) wago; fchwarz im Delawarfchen : /Md«i, im Samojedifchen : Sage, und im Chilefifchen: «»«, im Tatarifchen : kara; nicht, im Delawarifchen matta, im £fthnifchen meette und im Mahiccanifchen : efchta und afchta-, im Lamutifchen: atffcha; L'tckt im Delawarifchen: wocliejeek im Pumpocolskifchen (hey enem Oftiakenftamme in der rechtenSeitedes Jcnifei):' ehok; ich im Delawarifchen hi, im Muskohgifchen: aneh oder ani ( und eben fo, wie wir hiiizufetzen kon- nen, in der Sprache der Pimas, der verbreitetften in Soncira auf beiden Seiten der Flilife Gila und Colora- do ;) im IVloturi fehen, bey dem mit dem Samojedun verwandten Stamme am FluffeTuba: ne , im Tangu- tifchen nai, im Perniifchen : me, im ilebriiifchen : hho- chi, im Jildifcheni: anee. (Oafs der Vf. diefe Semiti- fchen Sprachen aiis eigner Kenntnif-^ aufftellen follte, ware von dem Ichatzbaren Naturforfcher und Ar/te zu viel verlangt , U Hfichtigkeit ift in diefer Hinficht auch im Folgenden.) Du '\m Poconchifehen: at, ira Hebraifchen: atta, im (^haldailchen : aa' oder ant, im Syrifchen: anat oder at, im Arabifchen: audyeh , im Oftiakifchen te; dafetbfl \m Delawarifchen ika, im Karlalinskifchen: eeka; Bein\m Tusca'Orifchen: oh. fkirel% im ArmenifchpnojKtor; S/irtibey den Indianern in Penfylvanien hackatu bey den Tufchetski haka, bef den Karahba tictaup, bey den Tfcherkaffiern ulHii. Doch wir diirfen unfre Lefer nicht durch mehrere Beyfpiele diefer Vergleichungen, die wir, ohne blofs wirklichfehrahnlictie oder blofs wenigabnliche Laute auszufuchen, hier ausgehoben haben, ermiiden. Sie find alle von der Art bald ein Wort aus dem fOdlich- ften Amerika, bald aus dem nordlichen, bald mit Wortern von der Nord-OftkQfte von Aficn, bald mit Wortern vom weftlichen Kaukafus, bald mit wenig- ftens anfprechendem Zufammentreffen des Lauts, bala fehr gezwungen vergJichen. Wir fchranken uns nur noch auf ein paar Semerkungen (iber diefe Verglei- chungen felbft ein. F.rftens: Man begreift leicht, dafs Hr. B. feine Worter nach der Englifchen Ausfprache gelefen haben will. Aber bey der Uebertragung der Ruffifcben Buchftaben in dieielbe ift er, ungeachtct der Genauigkeit, die fichtber iiberali obwaltet, doch zuweilen entweder undeutlich geworden oder ange- ftofsen; z. B. wenn das Brafilifcbe roig Kalte, mit dem Lesghifchen rohee verglichen wird , im Pallas- fchen Worterbuche fleht porn; bey dem Olonetzki- fchen techtee Stern, wird man ch Englifch ausiprechen, im Ruffifchen fteht tkxth, es ift mit dem Tuscaro- rifchenA^f^t^/f/i verglichen; das 9 ift durch oe aus^e- driickt , aber & ware beffer gewefen , weil man z. B. bey koeera im Oionetzkifchen : Hund, welches mit demCheerakifchen keera verglichen wird, nicht weifs, ob jenes: koera oder ko- ira feynfolJ, wie ftn Ruffifchen fteht KoHP/x. Am auffallenditen ift aber der Einflufs der Englifchen Ausfprache bey dem Delawarifdhen • CA«y Fell, welches mit dem Lesghifchen Cheg fchein- bar paffend verglichen wird, wo aber ckey Englifch auceefprocben mit dem XEF-, wie im Originale fteht, hocnft wenig Aehnlichkeit hat. Zweytcns: Mehr- roals haben die Anfange der WSrter mit den Buch- i aben n zum Vergleichungspuncte gedicnt. Nun ift aber diefer Laut nicht blols in dem Stamme, welchen Hr. fl. den Delawarifchen nennt, fondern auch in an- dern Amerikanifchen eine grammatifclie Form , wel- I - n^ 333 che vor die Subfttntive vorgefetzt wird, um das Pro- nominal -Adjectiv: iKerfetzung der Niebe- lungen Liedes mitthe'ihe y zuin Ober -Appellations -Rath ernannt, halt fich aber bis zurBeendigung einiger ihm ubertragenen, bey dcv Auflcifimg des Ober- Juftiz-Ge- rlcbts nicht voUendeten, Gefchiifte noch In Ulm auf. J E^ 'm: I -f ■- "r^— !^-*rwr*- ""» ^M.f WJ I sa4 wenn nicht vie oft bey zigenBuch- :ommt, dafs lie Subftan- (ocler Pof- lafs man al- moin , dein ib zu neh- e Sprachea iben. len kSrper- uncl wenix eine Schul- '•eideji, und latifclier Iii- chemifclier chulgeld in oo Gulden be fiir Kin- 5bis3oGuI- iiber 40 bis s 15 Jahren geld geben. liichen Un- it folcende iit hte/tge jii' ie folcktr Sr. t vfurde utid ben mitOe- ^ommiffarii nds del* Ju- am Mayn, nzlal-Ober- Ein Ober- s audi der n der neua feinex- der n, und be- machendo n Bearbei- I dtr Nitbem tiuns-Rath iniger ihm Juftiz - Ge> Ulm auf. i i2S Num. 150. 22G ALLGEMEINE LITERATUR - ZEITUNG Montags, den 29. Maij 1809. >).> * WISSENSGHAFTLICriE WERKE. VERMISCHTE SCHRIFTEN. PHTtADELPHTA , gedr. b. Bioren : A^ew views of the origin of the tribes and nations of America , by B. S. Barton , etc. {Be/chluft der in Num. 149. abgehroohenen Recen/ton.) Es ift fcliwer, fefte Grundfatze bey Vergleichung der Wtjrter ganz verfchiedener Sprachen zu er- greifen, wobey e.s darauf abgefehen ift, daJurch die Art ihres Zufammenhanges zu beftimmcn; und man tadele ja nicht zu ftreng'Gelehrte, die nach den intth- famften und gewiffenhafteften Forfchungen eine ge- wiffe Vorliebe far die Aehnlichkeiten einnimmt, wel- che fie gefunden zu haben glauben. Hat doch felbft den nflcnternen Votney die Aehnlichkeit des Miami- fchen VVortes: Helaniah (Mann), und des Delawari- fchen: Lenni, mit den Hellemn in Alt - Griechenland (a. a. O. S. 526.) zu einer ernfthaften Vergleichung diefer Namen, und felbft des der Alanen, verleitet, weil er fo fcharffinnig die alteften Griechen und die amerikanifchen VVilden vergleicht, ob er wohl aus- drticklich feine Mil'sbilligung vieler von den Reful- taten unfers Vfs. bezeugt. Manche folche Aehnlich- keit ift blofser Zufall. Der Vf. hat Molina's Sag- giafuUa floria naturale de Chili gekannt, und alfo aucn feine Zufammenftellung nicht weniger, wirklich fehr ahnlichen Worter im Chilefifchen (oder Araucani- fchen), und im Griechifchen und Lateinifchen , die Molina fur nichts mehr als /ufall halt, und aucb Hr. B. nicht in Anfchlag gebi acht hat. Wir konn- ten Hn» B. noch eine Menge von Fallen eines eben folchen Zufammentreffens aus fild - americanifchen Sprachen nachweifen, z. B. des Aymarifohon Hafa und hancco, mit nafus und blancco ocfer brancco; des candrou in der Sprache der Caribifchen Frauen nait dem gleichbedeutenden canard; des Mexikanifchen tech\iad des Deutfchen dich; des taito, Nacht, und caplhe, Haare, in der Sprache der Lule im Weften von Paraguay, mit VS und capilli; des topa in der Sprache Omagua im'Ktinigreich Quito, mit dem gleichbedeutenden ronoi, des Chilefifchen leuvu mit fleuve; des Aruwakifchen mautia mit matin ; desGhip- pewayifchen malatatt, ganz fchlecht, mit malus; des Nadoweffifcben opiniaiiare, wovon man eine hohe Meinung hat, was man bewundert, mit opinion; des. catte , faUen , htimafoi , Menfch , amaicii , lieben , jenes in der Yarura-, letztere in der Betoi - Sprache am Ga- r^narp. nhpfhalb des Orinoco, mit: cadere, honio^ amare; des anu, Weib, in der Sapibocona -Sprache in einem Theile von Peru, mit anus. Aber wenn. folches Zufammentreffen Statt findet bey Sprachen von Volkern, die faft unmoglich jemals in einem fol- chen Zufammenhange des-Verkehrs oder der Abftam- mung aeftanden haoen, dafs jenes Zufammentreffen daher kommen konnle, und mehr als Zufall ware: wie foil anderwiirts der Beweis diefes Verkehrs oder wohl gar der Abftammung daraus gefiihrt werden, dafs, wie Hr. 5. zeigt, drey oder vier Wtirter der ei- nen N'ation inSUd- Amcrika mit einer andern in Nord- Amerika, oder inNord- oder Weft- Afien mehr oder weniger zufammentreffen? Hatte ein folches Argu- ment Beweiskraft: fo wOrde es offenbar zu viel be^ weifen. Man ift zu weit geeangen, wenn man neuer- dings gefordeft hat, die Vergleichung verfchiedeiicr Sprachen milfste fich auf den ganzen ileichthum der- felben erftrecken : aber es ift voile Wahrheit, dafs diefe Vergleichung immer unvollkommen Iileiben wird, weno man nicht beide Sprachen in ihrem gan- zen Umfange genau kennt Am wenigften wird man in das ganze innereVerhaltnifs zvvcyer Sprachen ohne jene Kenntnii's einzugehen, und zu beftimmen vermu- gen, ob Verkehr zwifchen zwey Nationen in der ei- nen oder gegenfeitig Worter eingefiihrt hat, oder ob die Sprachen mit folchen Worten von einerley Stamm find. Um wieder aus amerikanifchen Sprachen Bey- fpiele zu entlehnen: fo ift die Plural -Fndung jini in der Yarura -Sprache der benachbarten Betoifchen^ana offenbar zu ahnlich, als dafs nicht eine von der an- dern angenommen feyn foUte; obwohl die Sprachen Cbricens verfchieden find. Und offenbar ift das Wort der Huafteker auf der Nord-Oftf«ite des ehemaligen Raiehps Mexif^o; ixal., Weib, angenooimen, und daffelbe ixal in der Sprache der Maya's in Yucatan (der Sprache, durch welche Donna Marina des Ero- berers Cortes DoUmetfcherin wurde), urfprunglich, weil hier a/, Sohn, ift, und ix bedeutet: einen, der etwas hat, fo wie ixoc in der benachbarten und fehr verwandten Poconchifchen Sprache vielleicht eben fo mit acun^ Sohn, zufammenhanet. Sichtbar ift der Zufammenhang zwifchen dem reyerlichen Gefangs- worte : Akluja , und dem den Gefang befchliefsenden Ton: ht, \e, bey den Chikkafah in Sttden nach y^rf^ir, der aus jeilem die Abftammung der Amerikaner von den Ifraelittn mit folgert, und ganz eben fo im nord- lichen Norc\- Amerika bey den Sonriquois noch Efcar. hot, den jener nicht gekannt zu haben fcheint: aber wer vermagdie Art diefes Zufammenhanes diefer Viil- " ^ t ^ ' 22J AT.LO. LITERATUR . ZHITUNO 338 339 ker zu beftimmenV So fchwer cs nun auch bey in ih- r«Mii gjnzeri Unifaiiue beUannten Sprachen, /.. B. bey der I'olnifchen unci Ueutfchen, wird, in «len einzeinen Wortern zii beftimmen, ob fie in jener aiis diefcr blofs angenommen, uJer urrprilnglich ahniich find; fo (Inppelt fchwer diefs bey halb odor wenig bekann- ton Spiarhfn ift; fo wichtig es ift, fo viele VVorter als ni6glich , bcfundcrs aber ihren grammatifchen Bau zu vergleirhcn : fo wenig darf man doch abyrtheilea gegen die Vergleirhung von Sprachen, von welchen uns niir ein paar Diitzend W6rter zu (ieh«Ue ftelin. Eine grofse Aehnlichkeit derfelben mit Andern giebt ofr einen fo bedeutenden, fo nUtzlichen V\ink, dafs man allmahlig dem grofsen '/iele iiaher riickt, zu ei- ner linguilch- ethnographifchen Ueberficht auch ent- fernter Welttheile zu gelangenj und wenn z. B. Gitij nachweift, dafs bey den Maipuri, Guipunavi, Caveri Tabak jema, dem a /cema Berg yapa ^apa yciapa heifst: fo ift folche Gleichheit mit regelmafsiger Ab- weichung fchon bey einer kleinen Anzahl von Wor- tern doppelt charakteriftifch. Nur die JVlethode ift zu unbefriedigend , wenn Hr. B. auF das Zufammen- treffen von clrey oder vier Wortern in >prachen an dem einen und andern Ende von Amerika oder Aficn die Behauptung baut, dafs diefe W6rter wegen diefer Aehnlichkeit aus Einer Quelle gefloffen, und dieVol- ker, die diefe Sprachen redeten, urfprilnglich Ein Volk mit Einer Urfprache gewefen ieyen. Und fomit kommen wir eijdlich ganz zu den Re- fultaten nber die Abftammung der amerikanifcben Volkerfchaften, welche Hr.B. gezogen hat. Erfucht tiberall urfpriingliche Verbindung zwifchen alien ame- rikanifcben Volkern; man fieht, wie forgfaltig er die Tradition von dem Zuge der freyen Vtilker auf der Oftfeite von Nord - Amerika und Weften fam- melte; er ftellt dieMeinung auf, dafs manche Vdlker- fchaften in Nord- Amerika, befonder^ die fudlichen, aus dem ehemaligen mexikanifchen Relche bey der Erolierung derfelben durch die Spanier nordoftlich bis zuletzt in ihrem jetzigen Sitze heraufgezogen feyn mochten. Aber immer ift die Haupt .{jatos allcr feiner beftimmten Refultate die bemeikte Aehnlichkeit man- cher Worter der einen und der andern Sprache. Und fo fahrt er uns nach Afien an < erNord- undOftkofte iiinher bis nach dem Kauksfus, wo er forgfam eben fo ein paar Aehnlichkeiten gefammelt hat. Aber ift denn Afien nicht ein ungeheures Land? und wQrde die Vorftellung, dafs die amerikanifcben mit den afiati- fchen Sprachen zufammenhingen, nicht ehen fo vag bleiben, als wenn man ehemals wohl von der ameri- kanifcben Sprache gefprocben, oder wenigftens den Ziifammenhang der paar Sprachen, deren Namen man kannte, ftillfchweinend vorausgefetzt hat? UnferVf. ift, fo mtihlam und umfiiffend fpine Sprachforfrhun- gen gewefen find, doch fo befrheideo, das R»'fiil«at, das er gefunden zu haben glaubt^ nuoilich die Ver- bindung aller amerikanifcbpn und afiatirchen Viilker und Sprachen zu Einem Stamme, dahin zu helchriin- ken, dafs die Grflnde derfelhen „ nicht zureiclien, urei auszuinitteln, dafs die Amerikaner aus Oft- Afien ausgeivanilert, und welchfs der Urflamm fey," wie fcbon im Kiiigange diefer Recenfion erwahnt wonlen ift. Natiirlich ftimmen wir letzterem voliko ■ men bey, und wir find auch fern davon, den Ziifammen- hang anjerikanifi;her Spraclien unter fich zu laugnen, o ler auf die wenigenFalle zu hefchranken, (WcClavi- gero angegeben hat. Wir wenien ihn fowohl in Nord- als ill SiM- Amerika im Grofsen zeigen kSnnen; aber wir werden ihn theils beflimmt nur von den V5li<.ern beliaupten, wo er fich wirklich zeigt, theils nur auf fefte Bafen des grammatifchen Baues der Sprachen begrilnden. Von intereifanten Aehnlichkeiten diefes Baues zwifchen inanchen einzelnen Sprachen kdnn- ten wir eine Meiige von Beyfpielen anfiihren; hier niir ein paar Momente nber gewiffe merkwUrdige Aehnlichkeiten diefer vielun, ilhrigens fehr verfchie- denen, Sprachen im Ganzen. Faft durchaus alle* die wir graininatifch kennen, driJcken unfere Pronomi- nal • Adjective f lurch Anhange, die meiften vorn vor den Subftantiven , einige am Ende derfelben aus. Eben fo die t'ronominal - Accufative: mich, dieh u. f. w. Hoclift auffallend ift in den, durch ungeheure Entfernungen von einander gotrennten, Sprachen das gleiche Beftreben, diefes tranfitive Verhaltnifs der Verba durch eine Menge von Formen auszudrllcken. Von dem Mexikanifchen iit diefs im j^rchiv fUr Etk. ttographie und TAnguiflik Bd. I. St. 1. S. 345- gezeiat. Aber noch auffallender ift die Hichtung des Sprach- baus, die wir in keiner andern Sprache der Welt ge- funden haben, durch eine ganz unglaiibliche, alle nicht ganz eifrige Sprachrorfcher abfchreckende, Menge von Endformen, nach welchen das Verbum flectirt wird, um in jeder Perfon auf mannichfaltig verfchiedene W^eife diefe Pronominal - Accufative aus- zudrQcken, wie diefs eben fo im Sflden in Chili und Peru, in Mittel - Amerika in Totonaka, einer nord- 5fflichen Provinz des Reichs Mexiko, als bey den Natiks an der Oftkiifte von Nord- Amerika, und im aufserften Nurden bey den GrSnlandern der Fall ift. Bey Sprachen fowohl von gleicher Einrichtung, als auch wirklicher Gleichheit der Formeo, ift die Vorausfetzung Einer Quelle gewifs viel begrandeter, als bey blofsem Zufammentreffen abnlicherSfammlaute mit oft nur ahnlichen Bedeutungen , und beides ver- bunden ift ungemein gewichtvoll. Freyiich fiihrte fonft dasdogmatifcneSyftem alle Sprachen nach Babel, und es ift ein ahnlicher Gang der, Urfachen fucbenden, Veriiuiift, wenn man die Spuren des Hsbraifcben, als der Sprache des Paradiefes, in alien Sprachen der Welt fuchen zu konnen glaubte, oder wenn man um- ;*»kebr' aus der, freyiich oft ttberrafchenden , Aehn- ichkeit, die ein oder einzelne Worter fehr verfchie- dener Sprachen haben, f'gleich Eine Urquelle diefer Sprachen fucht, wie uni'er Vf. Wenige Sprachen wird es gebeu. zwifchen wplrhen fi^h n.oK* «sr, — ^ fi 238 en Vtilker belchran- piolien, um Oft - Afien ley," wie lit vvorden jollko ' men Ziifammen- hu laugnen« , flic Clavi- hi in Nord- neii; a her II V6\kern iiJs nur auf r Sprarhen eiten diefes :lien kdnn- hren ; hier srkwUrdige ir verfchie- us aiie« die e Pronomi- eiften vorn felben aus. ich, dich u. 1 uneeheure >rac1ien das laltnifs der zudrttcken, mv/Hr Eth. 45. gezeigt. des Sprach- Bf Weit ge- iliche, alle hreckende, IS Verbum innichfaJtJg Lifative aus- n Chili und iner nord« Is bey den a> und itn FaU ift. nrichtung, »a, ift die grandeter, tamnyaute aides ver- Ihrtefonft abel, und uchenden, braifcheo, ichen der man um- n, Aehn- verfchie- 'lle diefer Sprachnn 399 Num. 150. MAY iRog. 330 folclie B«»rf»hranjf*'n finden lafffn , und fo wie V6lker, die fich nit* hi'riituten, oft eiueriey Laut iiiit verl'cliie- dener Bedeutung ergriffen haben; wariiin konnten fio nicht aurh einmul ihn zulallig niit einerley Boilen- timg ergreifen? Uel'len uiigeachtet aber ift, aufser dein, d fs uns Hr. B. die fcliiirzbarl'ten Materialien liefert, audi fchon dadurcli rccht viel filr Wahrheit Sewonnen, wenn man mit einem eifrigen Forlcher en VVeg zu einem wichtigen Ziele, wie hier mit Hn B., gphen, und fich tladurch I'tberzeuiien kann, was auf diefem Wege erreicht werdea Kunne. , . NEUERE SPR\CHKUNDE. Lemgo, in d. Mijyer. Buchh. : VoHUcindifre Syntax der franz'djifchen Sprache ; oder Anweifung /.u ei- nem echt rraiizunrchen Stile, durch eine Menge zweckmafsiger und inhaitsreicher Beyfpieie aus altern und neiiern franzolifchenSchriftltellern er- lautert von ^ohann Chrifloph Quedenfdd, Con- rector der Schule zu Goslar. ihoj. XX u. 674 S. gr. 8. (2 Rthir. 4 gr.) • Der Vf. glaubt den Auffchlufs liber das oft fo ieichte StuiUum der Sprachen in den „abgerifrencn, eehaltlofen Phrafen , in den halben, trivialen Gedan- Ken, in den nichtsfagenden Hoflichkeit^mpfoh!enen Autoritaten hie und da zur T nff faiUn. Schade nur, dafs diefe glUckliche Idee nicht durchaus feft gehalten wurde, da es doch dem Vf. an Stoff hiezu fUr jedr Hegel nicht felilen koiinte. Uabey nUiffen wir aber zugieich bemerken, liafs das Ziel, wurauf der Vf auslchliefslich feiii Aut^enmerk eerichtet hat, fch-verlicli ganz erreicht wenien diirfte. Uer ' lerwilJe jiinger Leute vor Grainmatiken hat ohne /^.^eifel einerley Urfprung mit »lem Kkel, wel- cher felbft manchen Lelirer von tlieler Lectilre zu- rilckhalt, — und kuniite es etwas Anders feyn, als der geiffigtodte und alio aurh geiftigtiidtende Gang der Regein, ihre froftige, die Vernunft gewaltldin zurOckitofsende Form, die als das eiiizige Hiiidernifs betrachtet werden mnis, warum Sprachen immec noch nicht ihren W'erth als intenfivc Bilduiigsiiiittel Sufsern und beliaupten konneii, j